HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-06-17 Correspondencethe and r rgaed residents o'.
tile St: 9^.n Prairiedu Chien are-,
- ` 3We,
with Gary, Y.line-alter
and his Sinbad, and feel -that the
are :acquainted
are
-'
no nroiilems ,,^,atsoever in
the neighborhoo . ?:e --does not run
ao causag
leo,: :iLiLout st.?_.vsion, nor cocicl,lie
he considered nean.-
aware that Leonard
,'egry has been unreasonable and
We are, els:)
L,rationai i.n his : ealings s;itr,, othar
neighborhood' dog-o:,nars, and orzr-
i nt of '109g tear
reacts at the g� anY
his property or in the area, e•len i
ttie ,+cy_ is urd;,r supervL:iion.
-
Name
Address
CN
4.
6
7.
,.
rte,
1 fT /12.
rl-
20
_ -
1 �! i Fl
,1`(: i l!
-.3 lr r -'r04 ��s
-June 17, 1975
Members of the City Council:
Re: Vacation of Streets _
The major component in the urban renewal plan is.the university mall. To
determine street vacations In the area prior, to the finalization of design for
the mall parking facility could restrict designpossibilities and result In
something lessthan the best.
1 therefore rise to support the recommendation of Planning and Zoning that
Dubuque and Capitol not be vacated at this time.
I favor not vacating Capitol and Dubuque until the design of the mall parking''
facility and traffic network has been finalized.
In addition, allow me to.call your attention to a couple of other factors. If _
the design of Plaza One is as It has been represented to me, it does not con
Lain the type of service area projected in the urban renewal' plan to afford
public turn -around space for the businesses served by the alley in block 81
(bounded by Washington, Dubuque, College and Clinton). Therefore, access
by way of Dubuque may be Imperative. -
I am also convinced that a restrictive design of Dubuque is;,compatable with
the mall concept of the super block based upon personal observation of the
Nicolette Mall In Minneapolis.
I am also convinced that restrictive design of Dubuque as contrasted to the
vacation of Dubuque would help to make the entire area more accessible to the
elderly and handicapped and would provide for greater :public :safety, ''not only
In terms of fire and ambulance service but in terms of police patrol If Dubuque
Is closed, I believe you may need to go to foot patrols 1n the downtown area. ;
In closing, let me assure you that it is my understanding that the urban renewal
contract does mean -that If you do not vacate College between Clinton and''Capi-
tol that Old Capitol Associates could cancel their contract with the city. This
Is not true, however, for the other streetvacations before you. You are free
to make a choice that you bel leve at this point in history, is in the best interest
of the community. You need to make decisions and acce_ pt the responsibility
for those decisions.
1, therefore, suggest .that after due consideration of the facts presented at this
public hearing you consider at this time taking action only to vacate College
between: Clinton and Capitol, thus maintaining maximum flexibility In design
` for the university mall and parking facility.
- Sincerely,
RLW:rew Robert L. Welsh
iurse 17, 1975
Members of the City Council:
My remarks are divided into three sections:
I . Timing - --
2. Design
3. Suggestions
I'believe that the Washington Street Project should be delayed until a design
for the university mall parking facility, has been; finalized.
One of the most important aspects of the urban renewal redevelopment is the
develoonent of the university mall. Until a design for this facility has been
developed, it is premature to finalize street design.
Unknown, for example, is the number of entrances and exits _that are needed
for the major parkingfacility and in turn the street network that will be needed.
Known is that Burlington Street will be presented with serious problems if all
traffic to the parking facility needs to enter or exit by way of Burlington.
-----I.cannot over emphasize the importance of finalizing the plans for the parking-
facility and an over-all-traffic and parking pattern prior to finalizing thedesignof 'Washington Street.
I
at me give you two recent examales.
The city proceeded with the design and construction oil Dubuque and Clinton
between Burlington and Court. Already, the developer, in presenting plans for
the Elderly Housing Project, hassuggested that some -change :will need to b
made on Dubuque since one of the islands is located where they plan to have
-- their main entrance. If the urban renewal planischanged and the projected "
use for the Clinton Street lot is altered from townhouses with occasional first
floor professional office use to permit a drive-in bank on Clinton and Burlington,
part of the Clinton Street project just completed will'-need to be ripped up and
redone,
1 would suggest that you learn from the past that street design' should follow,
not preceed, o.her planning•
The urban renewal contract Itself-acknowledges this fact. 14, calls fcr the
dei ign of the mall :prior to the design of Washington..
As you know, I attend many council meetings. In listening to the statements
madeit,is clear .to,me-that to delay the final design of Washington is'the most
lr�dlcal, the mont rao3on<yble cour e of potion.
1 trust that you on ha council who have said that you need A
tO pCOCeed_nON / aa�Y�'
because you think the% this is best and the next_ council might not agree are
indicating'a lack of trust in the governmental` process. Even if you proceed
at this time, I trust you will alter the design. _.
The design as already submitted for bids does not, I suggest to you, contain
adequate provisions fcr loading or unloading, it presents a safety problem
for-children, elderly and handicapped persons, requiring to be _dropped off,
'
in front-of hal: of the business; needing to open the , Ir car doors into a lane
oi-traffic or requiring-the shopper to cross two lanes of t,afficr
The present design does not provide an adequate number of parking spaces. `
It does not reflect the desire of the citizens for parking adjacent to businesses
nor does it take' into account the dependence of many businesses unon the
need fordrop-in business.
The present design is based on a one-way street system that will increase
-the load onBurlington and on Linn. In -addition, thus far 1 have heard no
consideration given to the problems that this-one-way street system will
have on the College Street parking lot.
The present design is one that merchants have questioned and thus they have'
ask= d if you persist to at least build, in flexibility. I have heard that the da
sign isnot flexible -,that I" it does not work and the street needs to be widened
It will mean ripping up the entire street and starting over again.
In light of the evidence, this seems 'to be a costly risk.
I --could, therefore, suggest that you, after due consideration; negotiate a
change-in the urban renewal contract and delay the-'.yashington Street_project
until the design for the university mall parking facillty is finalized.
Second, I suggest that you provide diagonal parking on both sides of Wash-
ington.
Third, I suggest that you also experiment with the one-way traffic system
that you are considering to ascertain it's advantages and disadvantages.
In summary, let me urge you to delay ,the 'Nashington Street project until
the university mail parking facility has been finalized. - I sincerely believe
that
this action is in the best interest of the total-community
Sincerely,
"Robert L. MI(Ash
Y / � •� �.�.Afa�pLrS'° Sar'Lif4.,.�15
2400 Tf venue South,lblinneapolts,�n esota .r .
I-
A_ dministration and Theatre School ti74 W0
Ticket Off", 374 04U11 {
C1 -I1 John C. Donahue, Director
LDREN'S
THEATRE
COMRANT
of The i.linn_i:polis Society of Fine Arts
Ila ,l2
Y -, 1975
Your name has been brought to my a
in ttentioas someone who may be interested
'bringin r13 live -theatre for children to your cottatunity. It is t•�ilh this
in mind that I contact you.
Cur Company, the Children
'^ Theatre Coapany of the Minneapolis Society of
Fine eirts, is anon -profit, p.-ofessional theatre.compaay of'-over-£iet theatre
artists, tingcraftheatre
and teachers. The Children's Theatre f over- i- dedicated
to presenting theatre for children of the highest possible quality, based on -
Spire and a -belief that fine theatre eeperiences, as well as being entertaining, in
tenth season,thetChild_ehe n's Theat. and humanity of young People. -Now-in our
Children's Theatre Ccmpany has established itself a
-
'he Finest, if rot the fines E, theatre for Young
otn home theatre this r one of
season, we will 3 5 People -in the country. In
Of over 125000 present 250 perfortlances for an audience
People, We have also toured the state of ilinnesota with a
Children's play each fall since 1969, perfortaing to audiences of over 20,000,
(I have enclosed printed material giving back round
Theatre Cc.�any) g information on the Children's
Last December, The'IIpper Midwest Regional Arts Council
a region wide program, The result was a approached w^ to develop
production for Young children, Live state tour Of Mother Goose a
TOcLRAC. will_dable su_aported_in part by a.$25,000.00� from
The grant different
enable us to present ten; performances °f Mother _
in at least five different location„ in each
effort on the part of the state - h state, (M-RAC-is"a collective
Minnesota ate arts agencies of North and South Dakota
, and Wisconsin to develop, implement, and support , Iowa,
graining throughout the region) PPort major arts pro
-
The
Company will create original, fully mounted
7-----_ ur between September 15th and November 30 production
contact with sponsprino 1975. -We will
ions -- individuals or organizations e.
,_schools, churches) to present the la (- g• local arts orgaaizat-
the production and Play their community.., We will prt7vide
and still be responsiblePromotional materials. -,Tito sponsor will provide the Facility
ticket -ales. epon or will local arrangements, including promotion and
The sponsor will -pay the Children's Theatre C
basted on the number of performances. The sponsor keeps all the ticket receipts'
o cpany a set fee,
to help defray the costs. ( I haveencloseda sheet entitled e beer Goose pts
Infor..ation" which Providesmoredetail about the arrangementsTour
and specifications on the facility) _
including costs
May 12, 1975
1zoS• 017W
v
- ISPIP,G
SUBJECT PosiCion
paner•on
of IOqa City;_"; Pronosed solid waste collection ordinance, the„City
LPRFPARID BY David Callen, local board
DATC .hI7,°1975 ff.
me stadirector. -
;' Tllr COIRICII lIAS BE FORE IT PPrSMITLY
A PROPOSEp.ORDIIIA`iCr FOR SOLID
iIASTL COLLi ('TION, T7E , HAVE"BEE?( TOLD P,OTII THAT TIIE
OP,DINA ICC IS BASED 0?I
i1 SO CALI LD IfODPL
ORDINe1tICP, AND TTIAT T.TS RECoiofr IDrp PRACTILT•,S 'ARE
CONViiNTIO1JAL
ONESIl[ BCLIrV7 NEITHER
OF T!Ii SE PACTS cOTISTITIITES. A RE C014fi3tIpATIO,1
FOR .
VIE ORllI?'.1'CE, LOR ITS PiMA,]ENTAL ASS IR(PTIO,I"
t F
filo ,l(AiL GET ;DECENT, ADEQUATC
IER�FICE AND ilM-
SIIALI tiOT, IS IRlSOU?iD PIED UITABLE, A*iD OB irCTIO?IABI,E
7170TtIIRDS=OF IO1iA CITY,!-, COLUCTION-SYSTEi( IS
TEz-,
PINAICP,D BY
=YPPLIED,` AND GEiIERAIIY
P:1ID, PROPEP.TY TAXES; A;7OTIIEP, Oiir SI.XC}I OF ITS SUPPORT
Cn1(ES IROPI (r*7EPv1ILY rIII,Y?iCL'D GrNr RAL RPVCtUIE
Si1AP,iNG rums. ITIPLICITI v
(F
U!t EXPLICITLY;P,VI Ir PAYS I,POPERT.Y TAXES Rlit]TER
g'iIr AS �IPLL AS,TiIE
O•1-'7ER-OCCJPA?IT, TIU COtC(ERCIAL Tr!IANT AS WELL AS
TUE P,ESIDF,tlTIAL TENAINT.
YET UtmFR: SFCTION.3 1 7D TI III PROPOSAL, OILY
P.rSInr?iTAIL PPOPbRT.7rS UITII
IQUR UNITS OR -'LE. SS 111a,RhCrIVr-ANY REAL SP,P.VICH
AT ALL-_ALL'OTIIERS
iTILI HAVE, TO PAY Ti7ICE TO HAVE'
-i -. THEIR GAP,BAGF,
ILYUIrD._ONCE'TO SOPPORT.TIIE
2ITl SYSTf (f TT(POUC(I PPOPEP.TY TA3T5 AND O;iCE
110RET11P.OTIC(I IIIGIIER4 RENTALS
1
_
OR rXPENSFS TO IIZP,L PPIpA'Cr COLI,Ef'TTON PEP.V7Cr5,
: tlOitrOVT'R, CAUSF OP:;
TIiE__ITDRRA7 tNCO'IE TA; ST[2UCTURr -
UtIDER IRIIell TRi
OPERATE Arlb TRIICII UE
PIUST PSCOG?7rZr AS RELEVANT, THOSE (,BIO "RENT UILL
+
PAY AN ApDITIOtIAL FI:E .?
-
_
,INCE OUIiERS i3UT ?i0� RT:NTrRS, NAY prpTICT PROPERTY TA): PAY( tPt]TS
-
C. =_- 7II
)tLPUTZNG,TAXABLE INconc
-r
TIIE ISSUP IIEItP IS tiOT TRIET1irP, THE CITY SHALL ACQUIRI ADDITIONAL
.
CQUIPIirNT•TO
SERVICE CO?RBiP,CIAT, TENANTS AND LAPGr APART1Q;iIT-'COIiPI,CXi S,
c+OR IS TIIE ISSUE OtiE OF PP,IVATIi Ti VFPSUS
FINALLY,>-
IS`TNE'ISSUI ONF, orItiCO'fE- DITRTPIITIOY
POR 7E DO NOT BP iiPV] T
q
9 South Mt. Vernon Drive
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
June 6, -1975 _
Mr. Edgar R. Czarnecki
Mayor of Iowa City
Civic Center
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mayor Czarnecki:
We as owners of the property described below call to your attention
a storm water drainage problem which exists at 9 South -_Mt. Vernon
Drive. Said address was developed as Lor 106, Part 4, Washington
Park Addition to the City of Iowa City, Iowa by Frank Boyd of Iowa
City, Iowa.
A 48 inch diameter corrugated steel pipe storm sewer serving a
portion of the Washington Park Addition terminates in -the N.W.
quadrant of Lot 106. Refer to the attached sketch which shows
the approximate location of this termination. Due to the excessive
difference in elevation between the invert of the storm sewer line
at its termination and channel bottom of the open drainage 'ditch
downstream of this termination, excessive erosion and ponding of
water occurs at thestormsewer outlet. Not only does this con-
dition present a safety hazard to children in the area,, it also
- violates easement boundaries and "Protective Covenants; and Restric-
tions" established `by -the -developer as well as presenting a main-
tenance problem for theCityof Iowa City.'
A review of the storm sewer design and the topography of original
drainage area as well as discussions with adjoining property owners
reveal the following causes of this problem:
1. Inadequate design of storm sewer system.
2. Improper alterations of naturalwaterway by the developer.
3. Storm sewer system not constructed in accordancewith
design drawings.
4., Acceptance of the storm sewer system by the City of Iowa
City. -
We request. the city to Investigate this p
action to resolve same. rob]em and to take immediate
urs trulyI
A.
mmel \ cc: Mr. George Bonnett
tet. City Engineer
RuSchemmel z�
Attachment