HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-07-08 Bd Comm minutes;.representatives COUia re UUlV u.
the program with a local housing director responsible for
mplementing,the program.- The material covered follows.
A. Amendments or_chan es to Section -23 Annua.l Contributions
Contracts ACC). Iowa City has requested that Contract C-765
be `amen--3ed to increase the tote]. dollar amount or: to red,
the nu: oar of unitsandmaintain the current dollar comn-:
A_budget was presented assuming ,209 units would 13C maintained.
Therewas a projected deficit of $27,790 for the 'fiscal `year-
Implemr_nting:inst.ructions-for conversion.to Section 8 will
be in the field -by June 16, 1975, (a copy was provided) and
will state:
1) The ACC amount authorized in -a Section 23 ACC
shall not be -increased, except 'as required to satisfy legal
rights of owners. --(This exception will probably not apply
to Iowa City.-)
2) No leases for additional units shall be entered
into, even -.f she "otal;number of units authorized -is not
iii�der
-
lease. P:e-have 201=units_=under=lease or a commitment
has.be,�,n made fou -"that -number.. This means -eight;units can
=z-
va and tt?E Ct_r^-.al Rl`.iCj
]. C a �ii.1t UnC:Cr lev.se IJ c^.-COiP.eS r pied by
3) is not
to be rc o_cu,
Lcrm is G0 'd'ys • or less , lc unit
r c: d under. cion ?.3 _
Tt cin, ,to:levcr, be
a slI ly a S S -. r• ion 3 vtu_I,_
cot✓^rtcd to a o.,�L
::nd c;ci:ensiuns nay continue to be
rt) T,Cas renes.=els but thE.term of renewal
aranced for occup'-ed units only,
cannot e mead b y
ond.June 30, ].,78__
ease in rEn"cs a^-d/or operaving costs r:-ust
5) ny but not
be _undsd by the �lilaination of units cLLtnOrlleU
under lease.
project
5) tinl�ss and until all units in a Section -2 J
to have t:-10 sc- grace
accessary l i e_, Separate
arc converted it:til�y+]`Q3:inistered SapaZar_e_y, »ninistrativE
CC-s erd,e�ch
Aust lil.l be an -4-
b„ngets, account-iP_g, and so
-,budgets
This
ti. �_
nicht
are, but I see no all-ernaclvc at
closed on
. S ction 23 , as
j) The door is not conpl rely gilding on the
•r1p;•1-aG�11t115i-Cred herE 7.R
"I O''1a city Dc"p CC CCCi' In
i t a - the, deLici L pro?
rer3uc'd because e•1e can only na'ie 201 un,ts
results of ac -C-1 discussed later,
be phi
d by HUD
our n�tdg F_ .,111_ be Tills deficit -
tynt under` Section 23- onl Lor oae �•ear-
x1-. s y but Y
:r1"th an- OP -Crating ubsi_d
;Wile conversion ,s noc b i')g
o ;acCi �n, 2 ;:e should start our
B-. CanvE.rsio__ _ , - ',ac _,oar
':'ac sc, at ie b� .r .r_d i
nanc'atedear- Costs co;lclnue of
con, —Lon t_t';c. PEY_t f1SCd�. Z CC'tUce'the nL'-]+�Cr Oi units
�_ ::E llil.l. f1:Vr' �o r -,�prs� on
: and.resUl•- l El nr• '-
i naPclal b SFt.R)
_o sr..1, ncaln e�...1 1lshcd
i 11r T'-,.1 �E,- r7r.S
,nc_c_. LAG i. c. rcquircl;.rn, _ 'and 1, a�.]_ n�ce� aly
f f ,
cam! be con I,r-c,. _ Itrya7.a be i_n
;.ust be ire rc,iac d _ ' `l, lncrc<��c in Lilt 1 r ?
re ;hose for quire so .c 'L ne of
to-sunpoct a This will re t a -
to (Jurat 13)- na be ner ormoa -
the nail � >' _� - rad -this survey , Y _ _
7aiLitln
iMnre o111'be re?u?red-
sui�rcy- Ir- is ,]clic,. t;taif asses n_cLe
,- Adclittonal subaltssi.on of a r t s _
ore nor tit spa---- 1 survey and Sect -3.0"'
[a .r'r c0-tOleci On Of.: ;:11' ,.. .1O _tO- _
r "UD a rcoueSC fo'aliz a t nst-
3
It ;s visa 11zed Lh2'in'tial rca_ue
or c ;gig �o of s a ,eel -
;., ted 1 tine 'r- lea -
F U 5
Sri,, b lnl not no: , J i le SBCond ha'
< the eight i.alts aurll_c
,c
W be.., Or hat Will tErnln ate- _. n _ p_, t_n•',,c�-d On
t?:1r-ber Of t"'b Ll?llc5 % (L SC arC._np : bBir-cJ
cal )
.1 l j 7
fiscal Y�- r- 5
Of ;:hC
19-16 ( lc•, C Lv_D I I CS t , L) Lon FiJLl lrl
e.�.. L, s e O _ ., - , 101
._ �},,Dsc Unl L-� Gh. Qti:r- , It -i.al rC y
�� 3 sect, sL or �II 4331; oral
-
to_al• This r*(Ii 1s t�� n
}l Ol iii b� by
LD_^-il .-! SCI- .L i. :1 Pn'. I O . nGl +�7 J"O'J]-
I�i11.L inr,r,.-1,1.111. .J_i7111 - 111 i. 9' TP tt2rC
i. l i 1'.ti J l. 1 ._y L I I
-1i!?11 t;illrf ��� 1 , In:•!; C.:: \ir 111.-1 ,1 (7111-.
• -3-
starting fiscal year .1.977 (June S0, 1976).
•
1.57 units under. Section 23. Existing (these to be
converted_prior. to June 30, 1977)
1.00 unit, undor ,tcti.on B. I xi.:at i.ng.
S -
62 units under Section 23. New Construc*ion. (See below).
This will increase to total dollar commitment for housing
assistance and increase the number of units.
C,
conversion of the elderly pr.oje�t IA 22-7_ to Section 8.
_r _..______r-
A'revised=Secti.on 23-pro]ect for which-, rted-upon-request.
selected and approved by [IUD may be statement from request.
This request must include a written statement from,che
- �irvc.loper that he concurs in the conversionandindicating
lits proposed Section 8 contract 'rents. If the rents are
higher Lhan-those approved;`under;-t23 program, the
he Section `
developer must provide justification that the higher
are necessary to make the project feasibJ.e. Higher
are availa-bindrr Section 8 than under Section 23. This
12 uspay,enhance the project by improving the cash f -hat and
mortgage viability by conv_erti.ng- to a ;program Lhat j
is ongoing
_rather-Lhan-kecping_it in a program that is being terminated.
aierefore,:it IS
Eventual conversion will be necessary, rarcfort this time.
suggested that conversion be considered
D. Additionsl-'uni.ts, New -Constr.iicl:ion under SecLi.on 8. ;The
_ _
---- an adTttional ].00 units
lIousing Assistance Plan pro�ectcd
ruction under the Section 8 -program. HUD will soon
new const.s in this area for proposal
of the state (within
be advertising cati
six months). The advertisement may be for more or less than
its. _Now is the time for the Council to consider
the 100 un
and decide Ls. her or-not__they wish tobethe owner/developerwhe-
of thr'se- 111111.5. The program could take the following form.
The -City sell bonds (IYPc_.to be,det-ermined-by legal and
finance staff-) for the deveJ.opment and ownership of the proic
The Council as the Housing Authority enter ;into an ACC with
HUD
Council
e,_ion 8 and pledge theACC amount and other _rental
The bonds
i.nc - c toy:>ards repayment of the bonds -�rould be
te:{ exempt 'and ;iould provide low cost money' for -construction,
and permanent financing. The property would be -City owned,.
- - and poore tax exempt. -_ Administered- by the _housing staff' in =
therefore with_o-ber`p.rograms,--thereby reducing_ operating
costs. We cannot w:,it until HUD advertise
s.
startrI thinking
and -planning this type operation. II'is recorrcrenodedai iti woe
legal staff determine the leaalil-y of: -this typ p-
i.ncl+idc orbit type bonds could. be uti:li.•red. Finance should..
determine the impart of such a bond issue on othec
d and type ofonstruction-
p.lnnning staff >should determine 'nee
re(-13 i t ed .
"•
or architectural significance "-id that
provisions
these sites
be incorporated into
once they are
the City Code to protect and preserve
-
identified.
The meeting adjourned.
onald
S eiser for
Jane",
obsen, Secretary
•
Minutes.,
'Page 2
June 26, 1975
'flowing discussion,<there was a concensus that Commission should meet
GREEN, the Johnson
in informal session with various groups such as Project
Johnson County Board of;Super-
County Planning and Zoning Commission, the
Conservation Commission,_ and the Johnson County
visors ,;,the Johnson County
hunt suggested that as many Cour-
Use and Water Resources committee.
Land sl
a short sl
attend these meetings should present slide
mission members as could
followed by liscussion. -He commented that he would try to
-presentation
to technical backup information.
attend such meetings provide
There .:as then discussion of the attached set of goals and objectives as
was decided to discuss these goals
preparedyby-Stanley Consultants. it
be held at 7:30 p.m. on
and objectives further at a special meeting to
Tuesday, July 1.
Hunt commented that the river corridor could be divided into three.prrtions:
corridor. The
[he`nnrthern corridor, the urban corridor, and the southern
-whichhe suggested shouldbe
-:northern corridor. holds fine scenic"resources.
such as hiking,biking,e
preserved for passive recreation activities
or �re
Theta urban corridore more spoiuitntloff
and nature observation. all
beingwouldthe focal
active.types of recreation, -
-that the southern corridor was>an area which
activities.. Hunt commented
but which could be suitable for mixed
had been abused by development,
there should be a concentrated
recreational activities. Hepointedout that
the corridor to resolver
effort -Io work with the developers in this are, of
•
problems that exist.
brief presentation regarding the potential development of
and
_,Hunt then gave a
He outlined potentials for bikeways11
the river corridor.specifically
oedestrianway s along the corridor.
further business, the meeting was adjourned -at 5:35 p.m.
-There being no
Respectfully submitted,
Ellen R. Flowers
-- Secretary-,
IIIE RIVERFR011T PLAID
•
BASIS FOR PLAN OEVELOPMEIIT
Overall
Goals
1.
To preserve the integrity of
the Iowa River Corridor. _
2.
io maximize the scenic and
recreational potential of the
river and flood plain.
3.
To promote appropriate/compatible
riverfront land use.
4.
To provide realistic management and utilization -of the
-
natural resources.-
5.
To promote an awareness of
the history of the area.
6.
To protect and preserve the
Iowa River as a natural
drainage way and source of
water.
Overall
Plan Objectives
Benefits
1.
Preservation/creation of
1. Erosion Control, maintenance
a continuous greenway
of scenic qualities,gives
along the river (both
sense of edge to urban develop -
sides).
ment and structure to city,
maintains potential for
recreational u:ce, contributes
to desirable fish and wild- =_
life habitat.
2.
Creation of a pedestrian-
2. Partially satisfies the need
way/bikeway along at
for walking and biking trails,
least one side of the
provides for alternate/no.l--
river with access from
polluting circulation within
-
both sides.°
metropolitan area, connects
different -sections -of the '-
--
-
city and links major parks
andopen spaces. Gives
public a greater 'sense of
aware-iess of the river re-`
_,,
source.
Overall
Plan Objectives-
Benefits
3.
Expansion of opportunities
3.
Partially satisfies the need
for water-based activities
for water -oriented' -recreational
including boating and
activity.
fishing.
4.
Acquisition of'riverfront
4.
Best use of flood plain, _con -
and/or flood plain for
tributes to ` --preservation of
park facilities.- Particular
river integrity, satisfies
- -
-needs-include: shaded_
defined park needs'.
picnic sites, ball fields,`
nature study, hiking trails,
and river access points.
-
5.
Acquisition of scenic wooded
5:
Maintains for posterity sone
-
slopes immediately adjacent
of the natural scenic qualities
the river.
of the river, prevents ,possib-
ilities -for future erosion due
to development, maintains
"
(contributes) to wildlife-
habitat.
6.
Acquisition of developed and
6.
Eliminates continued public
undeveloped property subject
and private expense due to`
to frequent inundation and
regular flooding contributes
property damage.
additional.land for possible
�•
recreational potential.
7.
Preservation of -views from major-'
7.
Gives public "a 'greater sense
arterials and highways. ;.
of awareness of river resource.
-8.
Promote land uses compatible
8
Eliminates conflicting land
wi'h the river _through
use, provides greater develop -
zoning, acquisition, and land - -
ment controls and contributes
banking techniques.
toward maintenance/re-establish-
ment of river as ,focal point.
9.
Coordination of extraction
9. -Protects
future land use
operations with existing and
functions, provides for visual
future land uses.
-
control of operations, pro-
-- -
tects.adjacent land uses, ,and
ensures realistic supply of
needed resources.
-3-
7/2/75
3)
Recommended Welton -Becket check on
louvered
Bathel
fixture design.
4)
Questions the use of luminiare standards in
regard
to cost andaesthetics
5)
Recommendation that before a-final
decision
is_made -
on:landscaping,,_the DRC the Design
Review_ Committee
will be contacted.
6)
Favoring Nusser-Larew sidewalks to`_remainif
at all
possible
7)
Question any alteration to Washington Street
side-
walks at the cost. of $21,000
ADJOURNMENT
n