Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-07-29 CorrespondenceADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSED FEDERAL -AID HIGHWAY ACT OF -1975 has ed major revisions in the federal highway program The Ford Administration PropoG'1 he bill in legislation it submitted to Congress on July 7. ll is expected to generate a great deal of controversy in Congress and among highwa y interestswhichpreferanexten- Sion of the existing program. BACKGROUND. The Highway Trust Fund, _which was created by the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1956, is tober 1,'1977. 'Phe Trust Fund receives the revenues from the scheduled to expire on Oc four cent federal gasoline tax, the diesel fuel tax, and a variety of other user taxes. These cent fed es_are used to fund the more than thirty federal categorical grant highway programs. The authorizations for these programs, which were most recently revised in the'1973 Highway Act, will expire on June 30, 1976. -- THE ADMINISTRATION BILL (H. R. 8430) Key Provisions: The Administration's proposed four-yearprogram (fiscal years 1977 e -In through 1980) has three key elements: (1) increased emphasis on completion of the-lnter- state Highway System; (2) a restructuring of the Highway Trust Fund with its use limited to financing the interstate System; and (3) a consolidation of the other categorical programs' into four broad programs funded from general revenues. Interstate Highway System - Under the President's plan, federal attention will focus on the completion, improvement, and System, which is 85 percent complete. rehabilitation of the 42,500 -mile Inter oned among the states The bill would revise the way Interstate authorizations are apporti to place' highest priority on expediting the completion of routes of national significance and essential to the connectivity of the System. A lower priority would be placed on routes of primarily local benefit. The _result would be that states which have few -routes of nationaLsignificance remaining to be completed would have their annual Interstate appor- tionment levels- reduced, while states with extensive essential mileage to be completed would have their apportionments increased. s for nonessen The new billeretainsthe 1973 provisions which allow local areas to transfer ratate seg encs [o nonhighway public mass transit projects involing the construc- tial local Int tion of fixed rail factl oral flexibilior ty in h the use of transfeurcbase of rred funds by permitting heir use for any project - to proposes to increase- 'Phis would allow a wider variety of public transit and authorized under Title 23 (I lighways). transit -related projects. Transferred funds could also be used for local street construction and safety projects. anized areas A related change would requirein __ transferred funds he used e amounthe t of m money_ transferred from which the, Interstate segment was withdrawn. Finally,, ADMINISTRATION'S PROPOSED FEDERAL -AID HIGHWAY ACT OF 1975 TheFord Administration has proposed major revisions in the federal highway program in leIgislatton It submitted to Congress on July 7. The bill"is expected to generate a great deal of controversy in Congress and among highway interests which prefer an exten- sion of the existing program. BACKGROUND The Highway Trust Fund, which was created by the Federal -Aid Highway Act of ]956, -is scheduled to expire on October 1,= 1977. The Trust Fund receives the revenues from the four cent federal gasoline tax, the diesel -fuel tax, and a variety of other user -taxes. These revenues are used to fund the more than thirty federal categorical grant highway programs:The authorizations for these programs; which were most recently revised in the 1973 Highway; Act, will expire on June. 30,:19.76..- THE ADMINISTRATION BILL (H. R. 8430) Key Provisions: "Ihc Administration's proposed four-year program (fiscal years 1977 through 1980) has_three key elements: (1) increased. emphasis on completion, of the Inter- state Highway System; (2) a restructuring of the Highway -Trust Fund with its use limited to financing the Interstate System; and (3);a.consolidation of the other_ categorical programs into four broad programs funded from. -genera - I revenues. Interstate Ilighway_System Under the President's plan, federal attention will focus on the completion, improvement, and rehabilitation of the 42,500 -mile interstate System, which is 85 percent complete. The bill would revise the way interstate authorizations are apportioned among the states to place highest priority on expediting the completion of routes of national significance and essential to the connectivity__of.the System. A lower priority would be placed on routes of primarily local benefit.' The result would be that states which have few routes of national significance remaining to; be completed would have _their annual Interstate appor- es with extensive essential mileage to be.completed tionment levels reduced, while stat would have their apportionments increased. e new bill retains the 1973 provisions which allow local areas to transfer fimds for nonessen- Thsegmentstononhighwaypublic mass trans it projects! nvolvingthe construc t]aLlocallnterstate-: tion of fixed rail facilities or the purchase of rail. cars orb uses. The'Administrationpropoaes to increase local flexibility in the use of transferred funds by permitting their use forany project authorized under Title 23 (Highways). This would allow a wider variety of public transit and funds could also be used for local street construction transit -related projects. Transferred and safety projects. would require t A related change what. trrttinferrcti fund,, he iiritrd In the, urbanized areas from which the Interstate segment was withdrawn. Finally, the amount of money tranuferred 4- into four broad programs care orical grant programs ro ram The consolidation of over thirty g .ri1e Urban Transportation Aspsistcc�s a Well should allow for greater use flexibility• would continue to P local areas wouldhave increased eater the flexibility [o use Urban for mass transit projects as street and highway Projects. In the latter era her than just on a Federal-Aid System. to fund projects on' any public road, local governments is flexibility and project approval The extent to which the multimodal flexibility in the tf lnd'ingy still limited, however, by [he p processes. nce Program, the Administration's bill Trans ortation Assistalocal control. The proposal continues In establishing the Urban P royal of programs does not address this key concern men tort urban funds and the Ac shows that the states the role of the states in the app ro ram. The and projects. The experience of imPtttn nta'dmin administering the urban program. have often_ ignored_ local needs and priorities 1974 National:Trans� ondents support direct local funding of nation Report reflects the cities' dissatisfaction with such a system in reporting hat almost all local government resp transportation programs, apportionment of funds Che Administration's proposal actually takes a step backward in the ulation by requiring 00 pe of the funds attributable to those areas* uiri that states make available to urbanized areas of 200,000 and above pop only 75 percent, rather than 1 p 1. 1 billion a year is authorized for urban Another item of concern to cities Undei carrentlawu$horization_level for the Urban Transpor- tation Assistance Program. 300 million for Urban Extensions of programs ($800 million for the Urban System and $ and Secondary Systems). The Administration would combine these two pro- the Primary ear for all urban programs, grams,_ but only authorize %800 million 11 a y annual au[horization.of $1.05- billionnor the s am urban and des moreaareasaand absorbs esents The an- a significant cut-back of funds since the which are currently funded separa some programstely. LEGISLATIVI3 ACTION II s simple two-year extension of the exist- The Surface Transportation Subco wh tt is nasicai y a Public Works Z1[e Committee ommittee has bill ed -- bill (11.R. 8235), ories. its own highway ro ram through 1988. It does not tackle the ing program with increased funding levels for all major ca e would also extend the Interstate high ay Fund. question of the future of the llfghway Trust erseY , began hearings Congressman James The Subcommittee, chaired by Howard o[ New J Julq; which will continue through September' on highway legislation on J Y chaired by Senator Lloyd Bentsen Transportation" ul to review specific topics-affecting The Senate Public Works Subcommittee on rings i Subcommitteeexpects to draft of Texas, hasscheduled several days of hearings gral July The the highway program ind trnnnpnrt:nlion In I, tion during the August Reccss• highway legisla C 1 w\.. M,-..ZO.•4:]Ki- - O./elf, (0+. 52411 I :. w.s.• of '-.,��14at l..7 - (Mi) a 37.i - low.\ Cl ry i.». 510 G „ ;)ou5e of �12pr��?ntatibe5 0") 316 o..2 210r.e.. GC]v=a?Nx-rvT OSE?A:IONS .. - 11) 2J�15 a22z_,.,a. June 30, 1975 Penny Davidsen 12 Bella Vista -Place Iocta City, Iowa 52240- -Dear Penny, As you know, I'm a r-ertber'of the InterCovernmental'P.elations and Human Resources Subcommittee of the House Government Operations Comctittee.- This subcommittee has been given the responsiblity-.of initiatin,:tine 1975'.General .Revenue Sharing, -' leislation in the House As a prelude to our fall. hear-Lngs on—specific—legislative - -- i provL s Lons for re -eWal, we'll. begin by looking at the basic fiscal problems f c:nc;state and local govacnaents. Hear 411- 's , have been sch2ei11_d to ',,.gin on July 9. Testimony will cover prr,jectioas of grocath''and financial needs; analysis of state- local, fcd ral-state, and federal -local relations; sources for revenue; and bud'g-ta—' requiraaents. , Hopefully, this wi.LL providea good foundation for thu fall le-Lslative hearings and promote a greater understanding in I _ the Congress of the massive --probl.ems-confronti.ng;state and-- -- localofficials. d:tlly. (welcome your Lnput as these hearinus pro_ced -and will personally -make certain that the--d'ifficultics -.- - - uniqua to oc:r arel are b ought -to the--=attenti.on of my colleagues - on the Subcommittee. = Pt_rnaps then we'll. be able to enact � Lationtient acclrrataLy reflects and responds to our io+a concerns. ` "Please [seep me alcrtee, on yourownsituation: Lest regards. I - 6dcaaY-rinsky - I f -THIS STATKON _r. r r'a.I,avea 0,11 e;.as x,nao= wlTt, ascvcL n FI9=_as -_, TN 4 DATrs July 22, 19.715 TO: Parks and Recreation Co!!cmission , FROr',1: Rules ,Co^mittee of the City Council 1 Rc: Proposed 9 "Uy-Laws - 4 i BY-Ln l$ fj Ioga City Park and Recreation Commission 1 _ ARTICLE I _ MEETING - - Section 1. Regular M2etin s. P.egular;meetings of this Commission snali beheld on the second Wednesday of each month. Section 2. Special Meetings. Special meeting of the _members may ii 111 be called by the Chair and shall be called by the Chair and Vice-Chair at the request of three members of the Ca-mi ss io1i. Section 3., Place of ideetings. Regular meetings shall he in'a place, accessible to the handicapped. ! Section Notice of-Meetinus. Notice of regular me=_tings_=shall not _4. be required; special meetings may be called upon notice by telephone not less than six (6) hours before the Meetings,. and twenty-four--(24) hours if a_,written notice__ of a special meeting is given. The news media shall he notified by staff in a similar fashion. iSection 5. Quorum. A majority of the members of the Commission shall constitute;a quorum at any; meeting and the majority of 1 "votes cast at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be decisive of any motion or election. Section 6. Proxies. There shall be no vote by proxy. Section 7. Public Discussion. Time shall be made available during all relular me-:tings for open public discussion. ARTICLE II 1 , ,kc,"i3ERSNIP - - - r :>c lion l O.ail( I ri,ian;. Th Parks and Recreation Commission shall j 1.con i— �i lith l l) �,r_mbec, Eight � in ;hill be appoint- ed by thy! City Co,.rci1. The Iowa `City School shall 1 - Parks andrC rea=ion C,.=mission - pate: July 2-2,197 CoTmit e' o tie City Council FroT: ?ul^_� -Page: : 2 (Article II, Section 1-:(Cont'd)) subject to the approval of the designate one of its members, a meAblrmembers rhzsion City Council, who shall ,serve as of of m_mb_rship• Iowa with full privileges the City of be aualified elector of Co ::�ission_ shall City Ic -1- but Section Z ( private Comoansailon. Memberscshall iserexpenseou(eccm,tnsaor may b_ use, or whenPublicmasse texpense511 11inocurred automobile available), child care, and/or oth_r exp which does not require relating to official City business, Requests for reimbursement for travel outside the City. outside exp--n5eionncurred r tratto the Citydttanager�d submitted Cosi m busi nessomust be 3. Orienta:"ion for Mew tlembersointm nt,Prior tn�lmembers shallthe first be Szctien meting r""allowing their aPP ertinent.portions::of the City copies of the p- _. provided with on B Laws, and other documentation Parks and Retreat` J -in coclz; that %-Iould be useful"' OCOm 's n . en members also CIOMMIssio their duties. They Y Ccuncibe-the-City staff', this - by members of the City C - be deem- appropriate - and others as may Corranission Three consecutive unexplained absences of a to the"City Council Section 4. ibsenc's. r^ember sh:�ll result in a recoTm�ndation .:ember and appoint a <tnm the Co,��mission to discharge said nevi Commission member. death, 5.-'Jacancizs. Any `%acancy on the',Cow-mission because of _. disqualification or removal Section r�,ignation, long -tern illness; Council after at-leactnc� days s all be filled by the City to the by announcement o, said Council.- notice _has been -given 6.in the minutes o1 the City media and recorded ARTIC_ LF III• C=FICERS- - - be elected The officers of this CorrJnission shall be a Ceded Section T. i:umber. , each of `whom shall and lice-Chairp_erson - person by the members of the Co;mission- r« and Term of Office. The o:,:cers of this Commission in each year; Section 7..• -election --� at the January meeting snail 5e el cc ted annually __ C to • Par:<s and "recreation Cermission - Oate: ; iluly_72, 1975_ - From: Pules Cor',Iittee of the City Council - = page:" (,1t icle LiI, Section 3 - (Cont'd)) s haif the elstth election ichallsbel_.lid asI notesoonheldthereafat ter as meeting, he is convenient. of ff Section 3. canciation,AremovalY disqual1 c—ationcorsotheracause shall be filled by the members for the unexpired portion of term. reside at all point committees, call special Section �l. Chair. The -Chair shall, -when present, P meetings of she members, appoint mee7Cngsfand Cin generaand sushrotheradutieslas may �benprescri�bed off by the members from time; to time, or in the event of inabilit or refusal to act, the Vice -Chair shall Section 5.Vice-Chair. Inythe absence of the Ctair, death, Chair So perform the dstiesa f thebe subJeCtato all nthe restrgictions have all P upon the -Chair. - ARTICLE _ DUTIES - - - _ Section 1. Genera in CThe haptesrt3�33�4noFhthe Iowaall City tyuCitych UCode.ties aSThe fo Commission ulationsshall o dinancesonandnbudgets}_relatingstorparks, - reg playgrounds, recreational services, and cultural functions of the `.City of Iowa City and make such reports to the City, Council as is entitled to in deceiveeems nsuch the staffcassistance and Corm in`the performance of its duties. information as .necessary The Commission shall annually transmit to the City Council a report of its activities and recommendations for the developmentand culturaltionfacilitof Vies and rprograms, eational centers, playgrounds,rior Each year at least 30 days p Section 2. to thelstart ofmtheScIIPd get review process 6y the City ts Council, the Commissionitallimprovementsl submit to trelativelto�parks, recommendations for cap playgrounds, recreation centers and cultural functions and facilities-sch ecor7ne` �o fissishall be on shall rank orecommender at leastd fine year period. i Year . ?arks <r^• ran rOn ::arrmi,si°n Ua_ ; City of Iowa C�/ CITY OF UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS t, 104 Sunset.Stree *!payor July 14, 1975 1 °+;r• Neal G. Berlin, City "tanager Civic -Center, 410 East washing St. Iowa -City, Iowa 52240 Dear yr. Berlin- suggin Thank YOU for our recent conversation in which T inks of that you commufiicate with usnlettergdidenot rarrive rent huntilgafter Iowa City- Unfortunately, Your our Council_ meeting July,, 8th. In order he expedite f University - our am duplicati.nz,-your letter to me and :the Council of Universimy ty Heiahts and sending them copies of that letter together with n well in advance present letter so they can have this informthe°second Tuesdayof of our next meeting. We meet at 7:45 P•m each month. If you or soCity could meet me delegate from Iowa with us, you would _be welcome. We felt our visit to your Council meeting some time ago was informative - Be assured that we will consider your letter at our next meeting,and respond as rapidly on erninble• There have been differences of interpretation concerning=charges and responsibilities in our contractual arranrements. Hopefully these can be resolved in a'mutually satisfactorymanner• We in the many discussions een your financial that have taken place betwofficers and our Finance olic chairman and clerk in efforts to come to an agreement. Perhaps it will be necessary for the two councils:to settle certain p Y` cement. tfeanwhiae, we will give your present about a workable arrang categories of budget items to bring matters and interpretations of letter careful consideration. Sincerely yours, David Belgum, Mayor, cc: University Heights Council Iowa City Council Ionia City Attorney Iowa City Finance llirector University Heights Attorney Gniversity Heights= Engineer M }+ �•� ems• �S:.rb 520`$ Governor St. — Iowa -City, Iowa RECEIVED JIII, ? 519,75 t - • August 11, 1975 T� ti I John Kobes S. Governor 652240 i5.0 Iowa City, _ r. Kob: i Dear Mes r „ _ ... of Jul 29: 1975..the �G ' y " Atthe regular Council meeting our>letterconcern on file y " 'City, Council received and placed The Council is lntsroftinteresttanditourist ing your grotto., An' some Possible future formation regarding histo , attractions-in Iowa City _ to include The Director, :.invests-` will be brochure,ahichae tiionse tis Julie Zelenka, will of Community-ssibiions of the suggestion. j gating the po :the-- the attention of the -the — f Thank you for bringing this to Council. "Sincerely yours. r y NealG. •Berlin Y - Ci ty' Manager _ EJGB/nh i