HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-09-23 CorrespondenceIOWA RIVER CORRIDOR STUDY
• -
PHASE TWO - THE RIVER PLAN
-
PRELIMINARY DRAFT REPORT
Table of Contents
Page
INTRODUCTION . .
PART ONE"- CRITERIA FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT • • • • • `• • •
• • • . 1
Goals and Objectives• • •
1
10
Potentials.
14
Critical Problems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .':
19
Secondary Concerns.
20
Institutional =Capabilities . .`. . . .' . • • • • • • • • •
..
Legal Capabilities. . . ,, . . . . . . .
:- ... . 20
Organizational Capabilities . . . . .. • • .. • •
, • . . 21
22
FinancialCapabilities.
Desire and Awareness -
25
•
PART TWO - THE RIVER PLAN
26
Plan of Desired Achievements:,. . . . . . . .. . .
. . 27
Northern Corridor -Unit . .
27
Urban/University Unit •' -'• •-
29----
9Southern_Corridor_Unit.
Southern-Corridor Unit . . .' • . • •- • • •
• • • 32
'34
Management/Implementation Plan. . . . . .
•
-34
Management Tools. . . . . .. . .. . .
`_ 34
Acquisition. .:.
38
River Corridor Overlay_ District. . . . . . . . . .
. . . .<
47
Public/Private Cooperation". .' . . . .`. . .
. . . .
Voluntary Protection
50
Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
'
. . . . 52
53
Management Structure. . . _. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . .
55 -
, Considerations . . . . .`.. . . . . . . . .
60
Special Problems or Proposals .'.
. . .
60
Gravel Extraction Proposal
61
Shore] ine'Erosion.
62
Limestone Extraction Operation
`,Parkway '•
62
River Corridor .. . . .. . .-. . .
. . . .
62
Boating Use of the River . . . ... . . . . . .
. . . ..
Figures
•
Number
Title
3t*
Plan of Desired llchievements -'Northern Corridor Unit
4
Plan of Desired Achievements - Urban/University Unit
5
Plan of Desired Achievements - Southern Corridor Unit
Northern Corridor - Implementation
Urban/University Corridor - Implementation -,
g
Southern Corridor_ - Implementation
`Figures
l and 2, Potentials and Critical Problems are not reproduced at this
-'time but
can be found as figures la and lbinthe Phase One Report.
•
1. Goals. -
• To protect and preserve the Iowa River as a natural
drainageray and source of water.
• To promote and 'develop -the use of- land along the river for
overall, -compatibility.:
•< To make the most of the scenicpotentialand aesthetic values
of the Iowa River and the flood plain -adjoining it.
• -To develop to the fullest the recreational capacity of the
river and flood plain.:
• To heighten awareness of the Iowa River as a part of the
'heritage of this community. `
• To ensure that use of the river can be enjoyed by all in
the safest possible way.
2. objectives:
• To develop land use policies that will guide the appropriate
development and redevelopment of the Iowa River area and
environment.
• Preserve and increasen ..open spaces and greeareas along both
banks of the river and acquire scenic wooded sites to conserve
them.
• Identify and preserve unique or outstanding topographical
or geological_ features of the river._
e Develop scenic areas and outlooks. -.
0 Expand opportunities for aquatic activities such as boating
and fishing.;
•
2
•
•
In conjunction with other parties, public or private, acquire
riverfront and flood plain property ,for public use and
enjoyment.
•
Provide; greenway linkages between riverfront activities so
as to furnish uninterrupted walking and cycling along the
river and flood plain.
•
Improve public access along the river and flood plain.
•
Reduce all forms of pollution to the lowest possible level.
•
Preserve and interpret,, historic landmarks and sites' along
the river.
•
Emphasize safe water practices and conduct on the part of
-
all users.
•
To increase cooperation and participation of 'all interested
wparties;
public and private alike, in the management and
development of the Iowa River and flood plain.
B. Coralville - Coralville Planning Commission: Coralville has not
adopted
specific goals and objectives relating to riverfront develop-
ment,- however, statements from their comprehensive plan of 1965 and
the 1970
update indicate concern for the wise utilization of the
natural
resources.
•
Skilful land planning will be -required -to -assure that
developments in these areas (steeply sloping; hillsides)
-
are designed to fit the terrain in an attractive manner.
However, with careful planning disadvantages can be turned
to advantages.' For example, a few of the numerous drainage-
•
3
-
•
• Provide a system of walking, cyclin
g, and equcstrlan
trails, connecting points of historic, scenic, recreational,
architectural, cultural, natural, or landscape interest.
• Provide a system of greenways in new neighborhoods which
connect neighborhoods to schools and open spaces, and
implement a similar pattern where possible in existing
neighborhoods.
• 'Preserve and improve open space, wooded areas and public
accesspoints along Old Man's Creek, _-Clear C reek, Ralston
Creek, Snyder Creek, _Rapid Creek, Muddy Creek, and Mill
Creek watersheds.
• Provide a continuous green area on both sides of the Iowa
River in Johnson County, with additional public access to,
and utilization of the river in order to preserve and
enhance its natural beauty.
• Provide community and/or neighborhood recreational
"
facilities within easy access ,walking tand cycling for all .-
age 'groups.
• ,Provide a system of regional parks, primarily to the east,
west, and south of Iowa City to alleviate user pressure on -
-Lake MacBride and Coralville Reservoir Facilities.
• --Encourage developers to dedicate appropriate areas to
provide neighborhood open space for each new residential
area in the 'reg ion.
• Establish a program to identify and preserve woodland areas,
scenic vistas, and historic sites throughout the region.
G
•
•,provide
for a vigorous program of land acquisition in prepara-
_tion for the establishment of land bank to create open spaces
in advance of the development of urban areas and to direct
-
developmentina more flexible and advantageous manner.
•
Investigate alternative methods of acquisition, including
but not limited to -negotiated -purchase -or condemnation of
access or scenic easements;. purchase of developmentrights;
dedication; and; joint ownership by different, agencies.
'
•
"Employ a variety of techniques to ensure protection of
unique topographical and geological features -such as
ravines, wooded area, streams, and river banks.
•
Investigate -the full range of financial resources available`
to implement the plan and determine priorities for _acquisi-
tion and development.-
3.- Residential
Goals:
•
Provide a variety of housing types, styles, costs, and
densities, in a. pattern of convenient, -well-planned, and
aesthetically pleasing_. surroundings, respecting the
natural environment. `
4. Residential
Objectives:
e
-Preserve and utilize natural features of the landscape by
careful and imaginative site design and development.
•
Discourage the proliferation of poorly planned.develop-
ment on the rural land and high densities on the periphery
of the urban area.
•
"Planned
• Require Unit Development" and site review approaches
for residential development-redevelopment.-
• Plan patterns of single and multiple family; homes,:-schools,
- -- parks, and other community facilities connected by convenient
and attractive open space systems and non-vehicular access-
ways.
Industrial Goals:
- •Plan so that all industries will be responsible members of
the Johnson County regional community and enhance the
quality of life.
6. Industrial Objectives: -
•- Establish criteria for the selection of land for new
•
industrial development so as to minimize the detrimental
effect on the environment.
• ;Provide development ordinances that establish industrial
performance standards for the protection of the environment;
and to periodically revise such ordinances so as to reflect
technological advances which result in greater protection
to the community.
•' Encourage the development of ordinances which will regulate
the design and ,location of new industrial areas.
7. Commercial Goals:
• - Locate commercial areas which shall be convenient and access-
ible to their trade areas and in proper functional and
aesthetic relationship to adjacent-land-uses and the >circula-
tion system.
•
• Develop and maintain attractive facilities exhibiting
high "standards of architectural design, site development
and graphic identification.
8. Commercial_ Objectives:
• ` Revise ordinances to incorporate the highest design and,
development standards to assure that existing and future
commercial areas are 'developed and redeveloped in a"manner
whichcompliments the community as an attractive and
convenient environment.
• Require all commercial developments'' to provide landscape
plantings and pedestrian amenities; :and to encourage pro-
vision for facilities -for -community activities.
•- Encourage the adoption of Planned Commercial District
regulations to guide and control all commercial development
and redevelopment.
9. Miscellaneous Goals:
• Encourage and request that University planning and projects
on housing, transportation, parking, and other areawide
concerns be coordinated with overall areawide plans; and be -_
responsive to needs of the -students, faculty, staff, and
the community..
• Encourage and request the University to develop, adopt, and
- implement a long-range comprehensive development plan, subject
to periodic review.
•
10. Miscellaneous Objectives:
• Encourage the location of new elementary schools as part of
an open space network of park facilities and pedestrian/
bicycle pathways to serve,a surrounding residential area.
• Encourage the location of new secondary schools so as°to
maximize safe and convenient access to pedestrians,
bicycles, and transit; and where possible to complement
other public open space.
• Encourage planning for the potentialjointuse of parking
facilities by neighboring activities such as churches/
schools, churches/shopping centers, schools/parks, etc.
II. Potentials
•
The following is a description of the most positive factors identified
::-in-the-inventory upon which a development plan can be structured. The
-factors.-are illustrated on Figure 1.0)
A. significant areas with natural scenic qualities worth, preservation. -
Within the study area, the Iowa River Corridor exhibits many
of the river landscape qualities characteristic of the Iowa and
I
Midwest landscape. Natural scenic features include wooded 'bluffs,
hillsides, flood plains, and rolling agricultural lands. Considerable
quantities of rock outcroppings--occur-on-these-wooded-bluffs--and
(i)This figure is not reproduced at this time but can be found in The Phase
One Report, Figure la. The figure will be -reproduced for the Final Plan.
10
•
hillsides. Where little or no 'development has occurred, these
areas provide desirable wildlife habi-tat. The largest concentration
of naturalscenicareas lie north of the County W66 (Butler)bridge n
Johnson County. However, a significant amount of undisturbed natural
beauty exists within Iowa City at a location known locally as the
"peninsula." There are pressures for development in portions of
these areas. The development pressures for the "peninsula" will
increase with the advent of:_the'Iowa River -Corridor Trunk Sewer
'
scheduled for construction (approximately 1977) from an area :south
to Taft Speedway.
Although not initially considered naturally scenic, further
investigations of the McCallister Estate (Shower's property):reveal
areas of natural beauty. The undeveloped portions 'of this river-
-:-
front exhibit undisturbed areas of typical flood plain vegetation.
In addition to being valuable wildlife habitat, these areas have
considerable potential for nature study.
B. Quality topography and tree cover unspoiled by urban development.
-Overlapping areas of natural scenic qualities are those areas
which exhibit especially scenic and unspoiled' topography and ''tree
cover. The combination of topography and tree cover create the most
natural and obvious -definition -of -the river corridor; the walls of _
the corridor. With its tendency to erode under exposure, the steep
topography presents serious limitations for urban development and
- is therefore most valued for its scenic quality. The tree canopy
-found on these teep_sJopes is`generally hardwood deciduous trees
•
lI
•
such as oak, maple, and hickory as well as the softwood-, linden.
Understory (small) trees include dogwood, serv_iceberry, and redbud. .-
This combination of plant material prevent erosion and runoff while`
contributing a'wide variety of; color, form, and .texture to.the
scenery of the riverfront.
?,
C. Significant historical heritage: -_-
Both Iowa City and Johnson County, are rich in history,
initially as a settlement for the Poweshik and Wapashiek Indians,
then as the seat of government for the state of Iowa, a center for
trade and commerce, and finally as an educational and --industrial
community. All;: have given this area and -specifically -the river
corridor, a vast heritage to recognize and build upon. Some of
the features which could be utilized include: the Capitol grounds, '
•
the Terrill Mill site, the Napoleon toimsite, Indian villages, ferry,
crossings, and the first stage route and road. These historical
sites should be preserved and interpreted for greater' awareness of
our past. -
D. -Scattered major land holdings still undeveloped..
Several large land holdings exist along the river which have
not yet been developed. These lands constitute more than 75 percent
of_all_remainIng undeveloped shorelands within, the study area. This
fact will facilitate future acquisitions as proposed in the.plan.
Additionally these large tracts can be more effectively planned
and developed by private interests than can small parcels.
• -
12;.
' •
car bodies, and other debris). This -dump ng of rubble has prevented
and/or destroyed essential streamside vegetation. Uses which have
been particularly detrimental to the natural qualities of the river
landscape include industrial and commercial uses -such ascement
and asplant plants, industrial storage yards, car washes, auto
repair shops, and mineral extraction operations. In some cases,
residential uses have had a detrimental affect_on the quality of
the riverfront. Generally, the closer the homes arp to the river,
the more adverse is the impact: Public uses including sewage -
treatment plants and public works facilities have also had a
detrimental affect.
g, Flooding of 1. developed property and flood plain land use controls
which do not restrict development, but allows the development to
•
be raised above flood levels.
Although Coralville Reservoir reduces peak river flows,
flooding remains a serious problem in the study area. This,
in part, is due to the uncontrolled watersheds of Rapid, Muddy,
Clear, Ralston, and willow Creeks. Residential uses directly
south of the Coralville Reservoir, in Coralville, and along
Taft Speedway in Iowa City are most seriously affected.
Recreational land in Iowa City and Coralville also are inundated.
Flooding problems can be caused either indirectly by resultant
flood conditions such as seepage, sanitary sewer, or septic
tank backup, erosion, siltation, and water pollution or directly,
•
15
•
by inundation and the force of surging waters.` Problems
associated with flooding will -increase .as the watershed areas
continue to urbanize. As development -occurs, the ani:)unt of-
f
water
water falling on impervious surfaces and runoff increases.
Flood ,storage capacities do not generally exhibit corresponding
increases, and frequently decrease as development is permitted
to occur in the flood plain.
C. Encroachment by highway and rail transport upon the river corridor.
_ Both highways and rAil lines crowd the river's edge at several
locations in the corridor. :These featureshavehad both an
indirect and direct _adverse affect on the river. Indirectly,
these transportation facilities have generated development which
has no relationship with the river and, therefore, have abused
--it. By locating immediately._adjacent`the-r-iver,their-.impact,
has been to directly block physical access and, in the case of
train storage areas, block visual access to the river. Dubuque
Street north-of`Park- Road -exists within the flood plain and..; --
has on occasion been closedbecause` of°flooding. Having_;highways
located close to the river has significantly increased surface
runoff. Future transportation facilities will have to give more
serious' consideration to these adverse impacts on the river.
-
corridor.
16_
• :
D. Significant to severe shoreline erosion.
Shoreline erosion is a- continual_ problem along all rivers.
The construction of-CoralviIle Reservoir may -`have increased :the
severity of this problem, however, due to the increased saturation
of the river banks resulting from longer, higher river flows.
Considering the serious effect of the shore line erosion and
the complexity of determining the cause and effect relationships,
it is recommended that -the Riverfront Commission request the
Corps of Engineers to -evaluate the, problem in detail and _
recommend alternate solutions to the problem. Certainly, "the
development of structures and the clearing of vegetation near
the river's edge contributes significantly to the 'problem and
the degree of impact.__
•
E. Land use intensification beyond the capabilities of the soils to
support development. -_
Although detailed soils information for -the study area is
not presently available, it can be concluded from -a knowledge
of the general soils contained in the corridor that many areas
are,severaly limited in their capability to _support urban
development. These areas._include all of the land within the
100 -year floodplain and all _slopes over 18 percent. Clearly
if development is to occur in these -areas -in the future, detailed
soils analysis should accompany each development proposal.
17
•
F. Mineral extraction sites past and present which have _done irrepairabie
damage to the landscape.
Sand, gravel, and limestone resources exist within the
river corridor. The past extraction of these minerals has
resulted in the despoilation of -numerous -acres. The 1968
reclamation act requires reclaimation procedures be undertaken
for all extraction operations after 1968. With regard to .future
extraction operations, three questions need to be answered:':
1) Is the operationjustified in light of the demand for
the resources, 2) what impact: will it have on the river and
surrounding environment, and.3) will. beneficial land uses be
possible after the extraction has ceased?
•
G. Present land development patterns which are developing to the
detriment of the river corridor.
In addition to the, problems previously discussed which
imply undesirable development patterns, additional development
has taken place which if continued, will have 'an adverse impact
on the corridor. These developments can generally be classified
as "urban sprawl" and are essentially residential developments
which are consuming or encroaching upon areas of unique
scenic beauty. if permitted :to=continue unchecked, the scenic
qualities of the river landscape will become so diluted that
at best, it"will 'be just another niceurban residential area.
18
•
Both municipal agencies and the county -have similar authority to
purchase property thru negotiation or condemnation and to receive
gifts or dedications. They have the authority and responsibility
to operate and maintain lands so acquired for public benefit. Thru
the use of zoning ordinances, special use permits and development and
building regulations these agencies can regulate private-development--,,-
rivate development:for
forpublic health, safety and welfare. Some of these techniques are
not presently being utilized to -their -fullest potential, particularly
specialusepermits and planned unit development concept.
B. Organizational capabilities
All of the local agencies involved have .the staffing capabilities
to acquire, operate and maintain Iands. -with In the Corridor. Except_
for utility and street' projects a majority of anticipated municipal-
•
and
acquisition could be handled as functions of the local park
recreation department/commission. The County Conservation Board has
a similar capacity on the county level. Any new acquisitions could`
could require additional staff under the existing structure _(e.q.,
new park maintenance employees).
Regarding resource definition and management, both the -Iowa City
Department of Community Development staff and the Johnson County
Regional Planning Commission staff have professional` background
necessary for such a task. Any additional resource definition
necessary could be supplied by -state and federal agencies-(e.q., United
States Geological Survey, USGS; Soil Conservation Service, SCS;
Iowa Natural Resources Council, INRC; and others). Depending on
work load, etc. additional staff might be anticipated.
•
21
•
C. Financial
capabilities
Eachofthe local agencies: -have implied legal powers for, the
financing of acquisition or development projects within the -
corridor as well as the operating and maintenance of such projects.
For illustration purposes potential financial sources for Iowa City
are shorn below. It can be anticipated that the other agencies have
similar and different potential iources.
-
1. Operating Revenues
'
- Primary source of funds for "operating -revenues comes from
_ property taxes. The present general operating budget for Iowa
City requires a tax levy of 30 mills, the imposed limit under
state law. According to projections made by the city finance
•
office this situation requiring the maximum levy limit will
continue until approximately 1980. After 1980, tax benefits
from urban renewal 'will become apparent thus making it possible -
to allocate funds from this source for riverfront improvement;
acquisition, -development, or operation and maintenance.
2. General Obligation .-Bonds
--- -- General :._obligation -bonds -are -bonds sold under .voter authoriza--
tion t 11 o finance projects which have either an "essential corporate
purpose" (e.g., the construction ofbridges, streets, etc. and
the equipping of fire, police, sanitation, street,`and civil
defense departments)ora "general corporate purpose" (e.g.
construction of civic buildings, acquisition/construction' o`
•
-
J7
•
civic buildings, acquisition/construction of parks, etc.).
The fiscal policy for Ions City places the two following
maximum limitations on general obligation bonds: -
1) Debt limit: Debt pledged as a general obligation of the
city of Iowa City shallnotexceed 5 percent of the market
value of the taxable property within the corporate limits
as established by the city assessor (state law requirement).-
2) Borrowing reserve: A Minimum of 20 percent borrowing-
reserve, or debt margin shall be maintained to meet '-
emergencies.
General obligation bonds already authorized and those
anticipatedunder the approved 1976-1980-capital improvement
program will.,approach the maximum debt limit capacity until
the late 1970's at which time the 24 million dollar urban
renewal, central business-district-development coupled with
the normal city growth willl-permit authorization of new bonds.
3. Housing and Community Development-Act Funds
The Housing and Community Development Act went into effect
in 1974. This Act consolidated the previous federal programs
for urban renewal,` housing and open space. Under the act the
city of Iowa City.:was entitled to $2,061,000 in 1975 and ;a
total of 58,2441000 during the 5 year life of the`act. Although -
Iowa City is entitled to these monies, specific projects which
meet 'federal guide lines must be submitted to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) before funds are actually
approved for use by the city. Projects requiring; the full
•.
amount at the first year entitlement were suVAOtted, W hl'iw
�3
•
favorable impact
and approved contingent to a environmental
assessment.- Among the approved projects was 5200,000 for
riverfront acquisition. To retain use of the $200,000 the city
must reach an agreement with a property owner or institute
condemnation procedures within -fiscal 1975• Additional `river -
front acquisition thru 1979_%ould also be eligible for HCDA
funds
4`. Federal Revenue Sharing-Funds-
haringFundsFederal
Federalrevenue sharing funds available to Iowa City-thru
1976 -have been tentatively committed for projects other than
riverfront acquisition. However, if Congress extends the
Revenue Sharing Program beyond 1976 some of,these-additional
funds could be utilized for acquisition and development within
•
the river corridor. I
5. Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, Land and Water ConservationFunds
The Iowa State Conservation Commission' administers_ the Land
and Water Conservation Fund (LAWCON) for the Bureau of Outdoor
-- Recreation (BOR). The annual LAWCON Fund, apportionment for
local` entities within the State of _Iowa is_$750,000. Grants to
local entities amount to 50 percent of project costs for acquisi—
tion or development. Each eligible project is evaluated; against
every; other eligible project in the state based, on a numerical rating
system established by the State Conservation Commission Screening
Committee. Acquisition and development of riverfront lands are '
eligible for LAWCON Funds pending -the -approval of an updated
•
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan.
24 ''
25
•
1) West side of -the river preferred from Coralville Reservoir
to W-66 county bridge (Butler Bridge), east side of river
W-66 bridge to Interstate 80.
2) Trail system should :have the flexibility to move close
to the river where shorelines not endangered and away
from the river for variety and scenic considerations.
3) Trail should minimize, as -much as possible, conflict
between residential and public use.
c.
A river and trail access park should be provided neac'W-66
bridge.
1) Park to have access from county road W-66'.
2) Should have picnicking, parking, docking and eventually
restroom facilities.
• :
3) Size recommended: 3 to 7 acres. '-
d.
A primitive camping area in the vicinity of Rapid Creek.
1) Access to the area to be by boat or trail only. -
2) Size recommended: 10-15 acres.
e.
Undeveloped river walls (steep slopes).
f.
Undeveloped flood prone areas.
Maintenance of ravines as natural drainage ways.
h.
A major northern corridor picnic park in the -area of the
homes existing'; in the floodway south of Coralville Reservoir.
is
A visual buffer from existing limestone extraction operations
and a lessening in noise generated from the operation.
•
24
Zz
•
j. A neighborhood park for the property across from the lime-
stoneextraction operations (if the area were developed
as residential).
1) Ideally, should be located adjacent to river trail
system. - -
2) Include picnic and play facilities.
3) Recommended size: 5-7 acres.
k. Parkway; type road from County W-66 and the access road to
the Coralville Reservoir.
-_
1. Visually desirable intersections of major traffic ".lanes
and the river.
M. Private development thought to be most compatible is'agri-
cultural and residential. However, urbanization of the northern
•
should
corridor be delayed until adequate provision for
public utilities can-be made.-
ade.
B.
B. Urban/University Unit - Interstate 80 to U.S.- No. 6.
The Urban/University corridor is the most heavily developed
corridor'.unit. However a significant area of=undeveloped land
exists within the so called "peninsula". in Iowa City. The basic
development concept for this unit is to provide and/or maintain a
visuallypleasingpleasing riverfront that has both passive and active
riverfront uses. < Disturbances` to the riverfront should be
minimized in undeveloped areas particularly those ofuniquenatural
beauty. Major construction should be avoided in areas exhibiting
-
29
•
natural limitations of steep wooded slopes, unstable soils, and
flooding hazards. Development or-redevelopment-in-areas already
heavily developed (Park Road to U.S..-No.-_-6)_ must recognize the -
river as the areas most significant: natural: resource. Plans for
public and private improvement here should include the enhancement
of the riverfront and public, access via walkways,;-viewing plazas,
landscaping,,etc. Development of the riverfront between Park Road
and U.S. No. 6 should allow construction ofretaining walls, walkways,
planters, and riverfront plazas to the rivers edge. Although the
character of the river at this location should be very much urban,
the river must continue to be the dominantelement.' The desired
achievements for this unit are outlined below and are illustrated
on Figure 4.
-
-l. Desired Achievements: -
a. River access for the launching and landing of small water
craft. Areas to be provided at all existing and proposed
riverfront parks.
b. Linear trail/walkway system along east side of the river
from Interstate 80 to Park Road and along both Sides from-
Park Road to U.S. No. 6.
c. Access to the linear trail system from Coralville via a
pedestrian bridge over the old Coralville power dam.
d. A riverfront community park across from the old Coralville
power dam within the "peninsula" on the Iowa -City side of
the river.
30
1) To provide a safe means for boating bypass of old
•
Coralville power dam.
2) To provide park facilities including play fields,
play areas, picnic_areas, restrooms, access, and, parking.
j) To serve as access and rest stop for linear trail system.
11) Size recommended. 15-20 acres.
e. A neighborhood park in the vicinity -of Taft Speedway.
1) To provide play area, ball fields, picnic facilities,
restrooms', access, and parking.`
2) To provide access to and from linear trail system.
3) Recommended size:. 5-7 acres.
f. Preservation of the scenic river wall (steep wooded slopes)
in the vicinity of "Lovers Leap.,,
•
g. Maintain vegetative riverfront and undeveloped flood prone
areas.
h. Provide and maintainactive and passive development within
the University District.
i-;- More compatible riverfront use in the old power dam area of
Coralville. _Suggest -either---park and open space, residential
or special commercial (i.e., restaurants, miotel, spec ialty
shops, recreation oriented retail shops, or other uses which
would emphasize and/or need the river).
j. Within existing residential areas not subject to flooding,
maintain uncluttered, neat, vegetated riverfront.
•
�1
32
•,
k. The removal of residential dwellings'from flood prone areas.
River _visabi,l_ity from Public' horoughfares.
m. Compatible commercialdevelopment-between-Burl ingtonStreet
and U.S. No. 6 with increased public access and use areas.
n. Parkway designation for the following segments of existing-
streets:
• Dubuque Street;_Interstate 80 to Park Road
- • Park Road; Dubuque Street to Riverside Drive
• Riverside Drive; Park Road to junction of U.S. No. 6
and U.S. No. 218
• 'U.S. No. `6;'from U.S.` No. 218 to Sand Road
C. Southern Corridor Unit - U.S. No. 6 to Southern Project Boundary. -
•
The southern corridor provides opportunities to reestablish
the river as the focal point for future development and redevelopment.
Buildings must be kept away from the very easily erodable riverbanks.
New development needs to respond to function 'of the natural systems =
'
particularly the wetlands and woodlands. As the southern gateway
'- to the loo -a City metropolitan community, proposed development
should enhance the visual a --
ppeal of the area. Figure 5 illustrates
the desired achievements. -listed below. -
1. Desired Achievements
a. A major multiple -use, south end, community park.
1) Provide active and passive -uses including: sports
fields, tennis courts, ice skating ponds, picnic
facilities,' bridal trails, nature study areas, nature
•
trains, day camp area, restrooms, access, and parking.
32
•
2) North end of `park would recall the 'historically
significant Napoleon townsite.
3) Park could be linked via footbridge to the Mesquckie
Landfill Park on the west. -Side of ,the river.
4) Recommended size: 200-300 acres.
`
b. Openvisualawareness of the river from U.S. No. 6 and
No. 218.
A linear trail system that utilizes parkways somewhat away
C.
from the river. Existing streets/road which should receive -
pa rkway:..designation are:
Sand -Road: from U.S. No. 6 south Riverside Drive
from U.S. No. 6 to 11 Mesquakie`Park.
d. An undisturbed or restored natural vegetated shoreline.
• '
Development which respects and is in harmony with fragile
e.
resources of the river :corridor. Development could include
residential, commercial, or industrial uses.
- 33
•
I1. Management/Implementation Plan
The Management/Implementation Plan is -divided -into four sections to
describe the methods involved in obtaining the desired achievements for
the river corridor, Section One discusses the management tools that will
be utilized to implement the Plan.- A management structure is recommended
in Section Two and priority_.considerations for public action are -discussed
in Section Three. The final section discusses special considerations,
problems, or
p proposals relating to corridor development.
A. Section One - Management Tools.
Management tools -that will -be utilized to obtain the desired
achievements of the Plan are:
• Acquisitionoflands for public use.
•
• Adoption of a special'River Corridor Overlay_ District that
establishes Principles and -Standards as criteria for all
future development and redevelopment.
- • Cooperation between Public Agency and Private Developer. -
•, Voluntary commitment by land owners who plan no new
development.
These management tools are examined in the following discussion.'
Figures 6, 7 and 8 illustratehowthese tools.will be utilized for
each of the_three corridor units.
1., Acquisition - Perhaps the most effective management tool is
acquisition of lands for parks, open space, water, sewage,
other utility and transportation facilities.
•
34
•
a. Lands for parks, open space and historic purposes:
Public agencies have the responsibility to acquire land
for"parks,'open space and 'historic preservation. The
river corridor provides opportunities to acquire park
lands that fulfill multiple functions. Parks recommended
in the Plan; of Desired Achievements fulfill various
combinations of the following objectives and therefore
should be acquired.
• 'Provides needed or anticipated recreational
opportunity.
• Provides access for river activities.
• Preserves historic'site(s).
• Projects -'unique natural scenery and desirable
•
scenic views.
• Protects steep hills subject to erosion.
• Provides educational opportunities.
• Maintainsflood storage capacity.
Acquisition of -these -parks must necessarily be in
fee simple.
A continuous linear 'trail system is proposed in the
Plan of Desired Achievements. It anticipated that
portions of -the trail system will have to be acquired
while other portions may be obtained thru dedication of
land for open space. Dedication is recommended in areas
subject to development in the near future. "Cooperation
between Public Agency and Private Developer" page 47
•
35
discusses the dedication concept. Acquisition is proposed
_.
for those areas not subject to development in the near
future.
To ensure the preservation of the unique scenic
qualities of the Northern Corridor Unit north'of W-66
bridge,, land across from the proposed linear trail should
be acquired. Here possibilities for dedication, scenic
easement or development easement (i.e.. purchase of
development rights should be investigated with
property
owners. However,.purchase of less than fee simple title
often results in costs approaching outright acquisition
without the flexibility of future public use. Acquisition
•
- of lands through condemnation should be considered
as the
final a)ternative:
b. Acquisition of land for water, sewage, other utility,
facilities.
To the extent possible, land obtained to be utilized
for utilities or transportation within -the corridor
should also be available for open space or recreational-
ecreationsl=uses
uses(e.g., bicycle and hiking trails). For that reason
utility extension in the corridor should be coordinated
with The Riverfront Plan and new development proposals.
Items relating -to -utility dedication are mentioned under,
- "Cooperation between Public Agency and Private Developer."
36 -
•
c. River crossings.
No new river crossings are presently planned for .the
corridor although some future crossings have been investi—
gated and may be anticipated. :Therefore the following
general policies should be adopted regarding river crossings.
• Bridge crossings should be minimized and constructed_
only if they fulfill a recognized transportation
need. (Regional Transportation Plan).
• Bridge location should consider the natural`
-
features of the area; slope, flooding, soils,
drainage, geology, and vegetation.
• Crossing where theriverchanges direction
•
should be avoided.
• Bridges should not be -located -in areas exhibiting
unique natural features'.
-
• Bridge design should harmonize with the desirable
qualities of the river landscape. -Consideration
should be given to form, color, material, and
landscaping.
• Bridges should frame rather than block river
vistas. _
• Bridges should allow views up and down the river.
• .Bridges should be designed to permit pedestrian'
crossing with maximum safety and ease. To the
extent possible, separate pedestrian and vehicular
•
- activities. -
37
•
d. A priority schedule for public acquisition is discussed
in the Third Section of this Management/Implementation
Plan.
2. Establishment of a Special River Corridor Overlay District
with adopted -Principles and Standards serving as criteria
for development and redevelopment.
By its nature, the River Corridor contains lands
which are sensitive to urban development. -These lands
can be classified as; water courses, wetlands, hillsides,
and woodlands. Improper use of the'sensitive areas result
in losses of both intrinsic environmental values and losses
to the economic and social welfare of an area. Destruction
•
or disturbance of these areas can result in creating hazards
such as flooding and landslides, or destroying water quality
and thus public water supplies. The direct cost of not
protecting these areas can be high.In the private sector,
costs may include the reduction of property value.or the
actual destruction of property; in_ -the public sector, they
- include providing expensive flood protection systems,
- finding alternative water sources or insta_1_ling expensive
water purification systems. ,To protect these sensitive
areas -and thus -the -public and private investment in develop-
ment it is recommended that a special River Corridor Overlay
District be established. In order .to ensure the proper
fitting of urban development within the -River Corridor
•
38
•
District, principles and standards are recommended which _
will serve as criteria for development. This system will
permit flexibility in development while ensuring the
realization of desired achievements and the protection of
natural systems.
a. Principles and Standards:
In order to fit urban development into a highly
- aesthetic and sensitive river corridor_landscape,
-
principles and standards will address two major concerns;
-
1) Natural Systems and 2) Visual/Land Use Relation-
-__ ,---
-
ships. _
Natural _System - Principles and standards recommended
the protection of the natural systems have three
•--for
-: basic; objectives: - -
a.)- Control of erosion, runoff -end -sedimentation
- - to prevent=land destruction and promote voter
-.
- quality.
b.) Maintenance of river, _capacity as a major
natural drainage system. -
c.) Preservation of plant resources and habitat
(fish, animal and human).
- Natural System Principles
• Plans for development should be fitted to the
topography, soils, and vegetative cover to
create the least erosion potential_. possible.
•
39
•
• Development within the corridor shall not
detrimentally affect or destroy natural
features such as wetlands, steep hillsides,
or %-,00ded areas, but will preserve and
incorporate such features into -the "develop-
ments site 'design.
• There shall be no indiscriminate removal of
trees or other natural vegetation.
•` When land is exposed -during development,
exposure should be kept to the shortest
- possible time.
• The smallest practical area of land should`
-
be exposed at any one time during development.
•
0 Critical areas exposed during construction '
should be protected with temporary vegetation
- and/or --mulching.
• Where inadequate vegetation exists,; adequate
temporary or permanent vegetation should be
established.
• The speed and direction of runoff water should
be controlled and released safely to`down-
stream areas.
• Provisions shall be made to effectively
accommodate the increased runoff caused by
-
changed ;.soil and surface conditions during
and after development.
•
40
•
Sediment basins (debris basins, desiltong
basins,•;or silt traps), should -be-installed-
einstalledand-maintained
and maintainewhere needed to remove sedi-
men C from runoff waters and from land under-
going development.7-
•`'Permanentprotective
vegetation should be
installed as soon as possibleduring develop-
ment. "
•
An undeveloped buffer zone preserving
vegetation shall be maintained adjacent to
the river.
•
Structures susceptible to flood damage should
not be permitted in the flood plain.
• -
•
No development should be permitted if unstable
-
soil conditions exist.
•
Development should be discouraged in the
flood plain by granting special consideration
`
for density transfer.
Natural Systems Standards
•
All development plans shall include provisions
for the control of sediment and runoff during
construction.
- •All
development plans 'shall require proof that
the soil is suitable for the intended develop-
.
-,Ment.
•
• All developmentplans shall show existing
topography and proposed grading changes. -
• All cut and fill operations involving an. -
area -greater than 8,000 square feet shall
require a grading permit.
• Grading permits shall `be -required for all
cut and fill_ operations in the flood plain.
• All development plans shall show existing
- - vegetation -(including -brief description of
- kind and size) -and proposed clearance
patterns.
• ` Clearance permits shall be required when =-
- total clearance is to exceed 30 percent of
• :
the proposed development site.or an area
greater than 2'acres.
• Clearance permits shall be required for all
tree cutting operations in the fIood' plain. '
- • - Roots of remaining trees shall not be
covered with more than 6 inches of - fill unless
specific provisions for the supply of air and
water are taken.
• Precautionary' methods -shall -be used to pro-
tect against, root damage due -to paving, site
alteration, -and cut -and fill operations.
h2
•
Visual/Land Use Principles'
•, Land use within the corridor'-ust respond
to the needs of the entire metropolitan area.
• Land use permitted within the corridor should
not have a level of activity, noise, smelI,l_
vibration, etc., that would be considered
-
excess, in an institutional or residential
situation. :
• Land uses must respect the sensitive nature
of -the river environment.
G. Land uses shall be permitted which will not
degrade water ;quality.-
-
• Land uses shall be permitted which heighten
•
an awareness of and 'increase public exposure
to the river.
• Land uses that destroy_or significantly reduce
potential for future desirable land uses shall
not be permitted.
• Existing noncompatible uses should be modified
to conform the above principles or, should be
replaced.
• _To help ensure the preservation of water quality
and retain the unique and scenic nature of the
corridor, developments should be fitted to the
natural features of the land. .`Structures
•
44 -
•
should be clustered or concentrated in those
areas of the "site most suitable for develop-
ment, with areas less suitable being utilized
for low density activity or left as natural
open 'space.
• Buildings shall harmonize rather than overpower
the landscape, (i.e., they shall not be so
obtrusive as to detract from their surroundings).
• Locate no structures where damage could result
from flooding.
• Locate structures so as to provide adequate
open space for view, air circulation, and
movement.
•
• Location
of structures shall maintain the
visual aspect of the corridor (i.e.,- the
-- ground form of the corridor should not be
lost because of structural development).
•, Locatebuildings topreservetrees and other
vegetation that stabilize and-enrich-soil, -
moderate effect of winds and storms, absorb
Pollution, and provide shade tand relief from
hot weather.
-
• Locate on the rivers edge only those buildings
which .specifically require that location.
-
145
.
Visual/Land Use standards
•
- Existing public utilities and facilities
shall -be of adequate capacity:to meet the -
requirements of the `proposed development,
or firm plans to bring them up to the
required capacity -shall have been approved
by local governments prior to granting -
approval of the development.
-
- •
Site design shall incorporateopportunitiesfor
access to and 'along `the river.
•
Buildingsshall not cover more than one-third -
of the -lot area.
•
Buildings shall be arranged -.to provide visual
• -_
penetration to and from the river.
•
To the extent possible parking, storage lots,
and other similar uses shall' be oriented away ;
from the river.
•
Mounding, landscaping, and/or architectural
treatments shall be utilized -to buffer and
- --
-screen undesirable -elements from from view. =.
•
-Extraction operations shall require a permit.
-
•
_Proposed developments fronting on the river
- -
- --will
be required -to -dedicate a minimum 100
foot wide natural buffer as public open
space.
•
46
•
between the administering public agencies and the
private developers is still necessary.
The planned unit-development-(P.U.D.) or planned
areadevelopment(P.A.D.) is potentially the most
important tool to realize wise private development
ofthecorridor. This concept envisions maximum -
cooperation betweenprivate developer and public "
agency. A P.U.D. is intended to encourage ingenuity -
ngenuityand:.innovation
and Innovationin site planning and design. By
utilizing -this -concept it is possible to fit develop-
ment -to the natural terrain and landscape, which is
frequently not possible under the lot -by -lot
he-
development. This is especially important in the -
river corridor
river"corridor where a high premium is placed on
both -preservation of 'water quality and the retention
of a unique and scenic environment.._ Planned unit
developments are=refinements-of the- -'-zoning concept.
Under, this process a large tract of land is; treated
as a'unit. Land useanddensity are regulated for.
the entire parcel rather than any single part of it.
P.U.D.'s can encompass any or all of the following:
cooperative concepts:
: • Density, transfer systems - These are the most
elementary forms of the planned unit develop-
ment technique. Minimum lot sizes and yard
48 -
-_
requirements are reduced, but permitted
•
building types and overall densities do not ,
change.- This approach leads' -to the clustering
technique with its emphasis on common open
space. ::_It is an included feature of the
following three approaches.
• 'Mixed residential types, no densityincrease -
these forms of density transfer allow the
developer some flexibility in deciding upon a
--
- mix of single family and multi -family housing
types.._
-
• -Mixed residential types, density increases
allowed,- these" permit both a:varietyof
•
residential types and an increase in overall
density of the area to be developed. .Density,
-increase-features can either be tied to specified
and quantifiable conditions, suchas; the amount
of open-space,`or-can be tied to a bonus system `
which considers such judgemental features as
site patterns, designandlandscaping, but which
may be open to _legal challenge
• Mixed use projects - these cover the widest
range of possibilities `including commercial and
-- possibly even, -industrial uses.` Residential
_ density -increases may or ma not be allowed. - -_
•
19
Another kind of public/private cooperation is
•involved
in "land banking" procedures. Land banking
involves the "purchase of land by a public agency
for the future resale to private developers. The
land may be either developed or undeveloped. In
the case of developed land, --existing structures are
cleared and sites made ready for new development.,
The public agency would place limitations on the
kind of land use and other development requirements.
In the river corridor these development requirements
would include provisions for public access to and
along the river. Provisions for this public access
could be provided through a cooperative effort by the
:
public agency and the private developer.
•
y. Voluntary; Protection
Public acquisition, -regulation -of -private
development and public/private cooperation can
yield the necessary riverfront access and activity
areas. There are areas along the river corridor,
however, which do not require public access or acti-
vity. These are primarily areas of existing compatible
land use or areas where no significant new development
is anticipated in the near future.
50 -
•
These areas must be maintained or improved to
thebenefit of the river corridor. In order to ,
accomplish this objective.the;_following guidelines
are presented.
• Buffer or screen -visually -undesirable '-
elements with landscape or architectural
matterials.
• Maintain as much native riverside plantings
as possible.
• Do not locate storage areas within view of
the riverfront.
• Do`everything-possible to harmonize
structures with surroundings.
•
• Limit clearing sous not to change river
views, create erosion problems or
contribute to additional runoff.
To help realize a well maintained riverfront-
the -agencies involved should be prepared to
provide assistance and advice to land owners who
desire to manage their property to the benefit of
the river environment. Phase Three of the Iowa
River Corridor Study will also address possible
design solutions to typical riverfront problems
faced by`the 'private land owner.
51
- 181`
•
B.- Section Two - Management Structure.
- The -Iowa River Corridor is the -most significant natural
resource within the Johnson County, Iowa City metropolitan area.
The effects of this natural system go beyond jurisdictional
boundaries. For example; pollutants dumped into the river in
Johnson County affect the treatment necessary by Iowa City and
the University of Iowa, fill or development within the flood
plain within Iowa City affect the flooding frequency and hydraulic
characteristics in Coralville, development of undeveloped areas
in the northern corridor increase runoff and erosion thus raising
the flood frequency and lowering water quality for all areas to
the south; and finally the recreational and scenic potential for
-
each unit of the river offers`a unique variety of experiences
•
for all people living within the region. This interrelationship
s 1. uggests a coordinated, unified approach to the management struc-
ture. Investigations have failed to reveal an existing structure
capable of dealing with acquisition, operation and maintenance,
and regulationofthe corridor resources. Therefore, it is`re-
commended that ;local agencies form a -contractual agreement for
the joint exercise of governmental powers as authorized under
Chapter 28 E'of the Code of Iowa. This contractual agreement
would ensure the maximum utilization of acquisitionpowersand
Uniform regulating controls. In essence, however, each agency
would act within its own jurisdiction to fulfill ;its
•
5z
toward realization of desired achievements. In addition, -it is
•
recommended that a River Corridor Commission be established as
part of this agreement to act as a catalyst, to maintain momentum
and to coordinate the implementation of recommendations. This
Commission would also work to achieve private donations that would
aid in realizing desired achievements. The>Commission would also
initiate bond issues or budget request for acquisi":ion and develop-
ment projects. Professional staff with expertise in site planning,
architecture, or landscape architecture should be available to
assist the Commission in its evaluation of development proposals.
It can be anticipated that a contractual agreement of this
nature will take time to establish. In the interim, it is suggested
that local jurisdictions proceed to implement recommendations on
their own.
54
•
•
C. Section Three - Priority Considerations for Public Actions.
Priority considerations are concerned with short-range action
(1975-1980) and long-rangeaction (1980-2000). These actions
concern the implementation of legal procedures, acquisition of
public lands, and development. The -actions outlined below
involve recommendations for only Iowa City. As other juris-
dictions express a„desire-to participate in a river corridor
program, additional priority considerations could -be outlined.
1. Short -Range Actions`- 1975-1980
a. Legislative or planning actions:
1.)' Adoption of the River Corridor Plan.
-
- 2.) Adoption -of RiverCorridor Overlay District
incorporating principles and standards as
•
guidelines and criteria for development and
-- redevelopment.
3.) Adoption of a new:more definitive Planned Unit
Development ordinance.
4.) Establishment of a contractural agreement
- be [ween all corridor jurisdictions for the
- joint exercise of governmental powers in the
corridor.
b. Acquisition:
1.) Purchase of park sites:
a.) Acquire park sites; estimated acreage,
230-327.
55
•
2.) Anticipate expenditure of $1501000-$250,000
during first five-year period.
d.
Summary - Initiate legislative and planning action
to "get the ba .11 rolling" on _a -local level while
working toward -total joint cooperation. Over pro-
gramming and planningwill be necessary to maintain'
flexibility in utilizing committed HCDA_funds if
condemnation is, to be avoided. Although $1,240,000-
$1,700,000 is recommended for expenditure during the
-
first five years anticipate an actual expenditure of
51,000,000-$1,250,000 as a result of over programming.
2. Long
-Range Actions -, 1980-2000
a.
_Legislative or planning actions:
•
1.)
Review and`update'Corridor Plan to incorporate
-_
new legislative, technological, and planning
capabilities.
2.) Introduce bond issue for the completion of
acquisition and development.
b.
Acquisition: -
lr) Complete purchase of park sites:
- a.) Estimated acreage: 20-30 (this would be
acreage which was not able to.be purchased
-
-
1975-1980).
b.) Estimated present day cost $150,000-
$225,000.
• -
57
—
2.)
Complete
purchase of land banking proposal:
•
a,)
Continue acquisition of developed property
on both sides of river between Burlington
Street and U.S. 96.
b,)
Estimated acquisition costs for the + 45 acres:
$3,500,000-
c.)
Property to be resold to developers during ;
this period.
3,)
Purchase of housing in floodprone.areas:
a,)
Purchase homes as they go on market.
b.)
Estimated present day market value
$600,000-$700,000
- 4,)
Development of river corridor parks:
a,)
Of the 300-350 acres of river corridor
•-
parks, figure 100-125 acres developed
moderately heavy (i.e. ballfields,-tennis
courts, picnic, roads, parking, etc.). For
this -figure,; -$12,000 per acre construction
costs resulting in $1,200,000-$1,500,000
estimated expenditure. Figure 200-250
acres low level development (nature areas,
trails, res trooms,`etc.),,figure $2,000 per
resulting in $400,000-$500,000 esti-
acre
mated expenditure.
_
58
•
•_
b.)' Tota lestimated expenditure for park
development -$1,600,000-$2,000,000.__ -
_
5.)
Development of linear trail system:
a.)- Anticipated length of trail to be developed:
+ 8 miles.
-
b.) Trail surface -to vary, from crushed compacted
stone in northern end to paved walks from
University -area 'south.
c.)- Estimate construction costs; $95,000-$120,000.
6.)
Summary of_`1980-2000 estimated expenditures.*
•'Acquisi_tion** $4,100,000 S4, 200,000
• Development Parks 1,600,000 2,000,000
• Develo ment Trails 95,000 120,000
p
•
TOTAL 1980-2000 $5,795,000 -$6,320,000
*Costs do not
include any estimate for erosion protection.
**Costs do not
include park acquisition becuase these are
included in
first five -,year program.
•
59
•
D. Section Four - Special -Problems -or Proposals.-
I. Proposed -sand -and gravel extraction operation immediately
south of Iowa City: - -
In the past mineral extraction operations have contributed
to the degradation of economic and scenic values of the river
corridor. The Reclamation Act of 1968 attempts to solve one
of the problems associated with such operations; reclamation
of the land. This act, however,_does not address other problems
associated with extraction operations, namely the visual and
physical impacts on adjacent land uses and the river. There-
fore, if mineral extraction is to be permitted within the
corridor, it should be done on a'special `or conditional use,
permit basis. To be eligible for a special permit, the
•
extractioncompany should fulfill the fol lowing`requirements: --
• Extraction operation shall comply with all the
principles and standard previously described for the
River Corridor Overlay District.
• Provide proof of need.
• Provide plans illustrating' possible future uses based -
on anticipated extraction.
• Provide plans showing the functional layout for the
operation and techniques to be utilized for buffering
and screening. Included as a part of this plan will
be the location of storage and stockpile areas, location
60
•
of machinery and equipment areas, building
location(s) and transportation and circulation
movements. The plan shall also discussmeasures
to be taken to minimize traffic:problems. Final
permit shall be subject ,to the approval of plans
by -local -governmental agency.
If properly- planned, the proposed extraction operation
could contribute additionalpotential to the southern corridor
unit. Future land usealternativesinclude:
•."Park and ;recreation as an addition or supple-
ment to proposed south end park.
• Residential. - -
• Office park.
•
However, the "burden of proof and justification must be
the developers. The operation should be permitted only after
- the developer has agreed to the conditions imposed by the
local agency.
2. Shoreline Erosion:
Shoreline erosion is a continual problem associa11 ted with
all midwestern rivers. The causes and solution(s) to.the
erosion problem are beyond the scope of this study. It is
recommended, therefore, that the local jurisdictions request
the Army Corps of Engineers prepare an indepth study of the
problem which would result in recommendations of alternate
solutions.
61
3, Existing Limestone Extraction Operation.
•
Recommend negotiations with River Products for a
50-75 foot landscape easement. Suggest River Products
consider dedication of such an easement with public
responsible for restoring bank and slope and
agencies
- - providing necessary maintenance.
4. Proposed River Corridor Parkway.
Parkway would be continuous from the northern to
the southern end of -the project. Parkway would be
appropriately landscaped and would provide for the
vehicular inspection of the landscapes typical to the
Speed limits on the Parkway should be
river corridor.
reduced to allow for more casual viewing of river
corridor scenery. Southern portions of the Parkway
significant and would incorporate
would be historically
for bicycling and walking. Design considerations
walkways
for the Parkway drive will 'be examined in Phase Three.
-5, Boating Use of the River.
The Iowa River` -is a narrow river with shorelines subject
erosion. Because of the associated threat to
to serious
riverbank stability and boating safety, power boating
conditions should be prohibited. All other
creating wake
of slower speed boating such as canoes, row boats,
types
be encouraged by providing
rafts, paddleboats, etc. should
additional river access at all park sites.
G2
In
_. 1
�H
r
«
ti s
y
_. 1
_�. �. {;
��* .A s.� r, t
j
,�;
��=-
��
�a ''_'.
�� ���'`
,,:_,.:
`9:�++"✓
� -
a
i'.'
I`
S
,�.
_. _::-_:
ti
��
T � z
�;
C � Z �� 2,
r�rF
.
�_ -
T5i
-�
,..
_�. �. {;
��* .A s.� r, t
j
,�;
��=-
��
�a ''_'.
�� ���'`
,,:_,.:
`9:�++"✓
� -
a
i'.'
I`
S
,�.
_. _::-_:
ti
��
T � z
3 �1 �l
�. p
7 F�'' .� k
1
- Y � �
�
[ 6 -r
Y�..
.7 ,..n
��
: s �'. :
- i
T�_ S .J _.
t�-.__
�1 CJ
• • CFTC
Yl
City High school
JI
Iowa City Iowa
5220
L
-1
City Council
Iowa City civic center
Washington Street
Iowa City, ;Iowa
Dear Sirs; the
attention that theriashacans1in
St has come to our the cityrrostnumber.
city., There. are 35 _
o£ trash cans in the
area between Burlington and Iowa and Clinton
which are in the downtown
deficiency of_cana. In one block on
and Linn. In this area there is no
Washington and College there are ix trash cans.
Clinton _street between
side of Clinton you will .not £ind`a
only, in ct
If you cross the street to the south
n ar
limited to tareasY.nWewbelieve
single can. The trash cans are that trashea
surrounding
there are no trash cans in the
Good laces to start would,.
through thecity. p
cans should be spread out
If trash cans are there people will use
be in areas such as Towncrest.
them and we believe this will be a step fcrwarWei were told by thecity
made is this; citfor
One more point that should be
20 dollars. If youcan spend S12,500
that each trash can costs about
each eras, willing to keep this city clean by adding
two you should be
-
a few trash cans.
_ _ _ Signed,
j
1
• _
OFFICES
•
_ `LAW
r
HAWKEYE LEGAL AID SOCIETY -
E
-
_ 114 East Prentiss - T[LEPMOM[
114
.:, _ ,. (312) :351-8370 .:
---THOM" H. MCMUPRAY.-DIPCCTOR
�- _ IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240
- - -
JOHN M. C"MMAM
.. -: snvsA A. Lards-
JOMM M. MAKER.
September 12, 1975
Ms. Abbie Stolfus _
City -=Clerk of Iowa City_ --
Civic Center-
Washington Street
Iowa -City, Iowa 52240
RE: Suspension of taxes for Jan
A Slavik
Dear Ms. StOlfus:
This office is assisting Jan A. Slavik of 930
Iowa Avenue in seeking.`a_suspension-of his property
taxes. -_
-
Enclosed with this letter is a petition for
suspension and an additional information form signed
by Mr. Slavik. -
It is my understanding that according to the
provisions of Section 427.8"of-the Iowa Code, this
- -petition-first
needs to.be acted upon by the City
Council -and then `forwarded 'to the County Auditors'
Office for presentation to the Board of Supervisors
for final approval.
-
Is is customary or.advisable for Mr. Slavik-or
a representative of this office to personally make
any, presentation to the City; Council? Please let
me know if 'there- is any -,,,additional information you
need. Thank you.
-.Sincerely yours, -
�• ���
H. McMur
Thomas
Enclosures
TMsw,—
cc: Jan A.>Slavik
930 Iowa Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa