HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-12-17 CorrespondenceE
�J
0
Definition of Terms:
1. Supervisor and coordinator are synonyms.
The title "ASERP Coordinator"
can be used in this reference however, the title "Recreation Supervisor"
is used in City personnel guidelines.
2. Recreation Leader is the title used for the persons hired to lead or
instruct the activities at each location.
3. Permanent Staff refers to those City positions hired on a year-round
basis and in most all cases full time.
A. Current Plan (4 schools): $800-$900
This plan was in use this fall and last spring and called for an eight week
program two days per week at each school. Personnel and material costs
were approximately:
1. Supervision (no part-time supervisor in spring of 1974) included 8 weeks
program and 2 weeks of post season work $300-$360. Should have had the
supervisor on stream at least 2 weeks (12 weeks total time) prior to
program start for necessary preparation.
12 hrs X 10 wks @ $3.00/hr
2. We had 4 leaders at 4 schools for 8 weeks.
=$360
4 schools X 4 leaders X 8 wks X 1 1/2 hrs @ $2.50/hr=$480
3. Materials estimated cost about $50-$75.
4. Permanent staff time not charged but calculated with information avail-
able: Superintendent -25 hours, one Recreation Program Supervisor -20 hours,
one Naturalist -50 hours, clerical time not counted. (Assistant Superin-
tendent also did sane preliminary work which we would guess at 20 hours
conservatively since he contacted each school principal at least once,
0
11
prepared some written materials, interviewed and hired some staff).
5. Total cost estimated at $806-$891.
The fee charged was $3 per activity participant with a maximum of 15 children
per group. Our experience and consultation with staff indicated this to be
an optimum number ofchildren per group for the caliber of activity leaders.
This change was not sufficient to cover the costs of the program excluding
permanent staff.
B. Proposed Plan (13 schools) : $6110
In calculating costs for the future, we made the following recceimendations
based on past experience and the proposed guidelines established by the
ASERP Committee:
1. Planning and Organizing -to begin at least six weeks prior to first
activity.
a. One person, called the Coordinator or Supervisor with staff support
(clerical and administrative) will work full time to prepare the
work for 13 schools.
40 hrs X 6 wks X $3.00/hr
=$720
2. Supervision by Coordinator -supervising the actual project for 8 weeks.
a. The Coordinator of Supervisor will work on a full-time basis for
8 weeks. Two part-time supervisors will be required for 10 weeks.
Scme full-time staff support will be required and will increase pro-
portionately to the number of schools used. Permanent staff function:
1. Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent for hiring 000rdin-
ator/supervisor, consultation on general plans and problems,
administrative advice.
2. Three program supervisors serving as specialists for consultation
and supervision of specific activities much as school special
is
u
3. Office secretaries to type and prepare printed materials such
as schedules, class lists, program items, evaluations, reports, etc.
b.. 40 hrs X 8 wks @ $3.00/hr (Coordinator) =$960
2 X 10 hrs X 10 wks @ $2.50/hr (Asst. Coordinators)=$500
3. Evaluation by Coordinator -evaluating the program could be done by
coordinator/supervisor in change in one weeks time @ $3.00/tr=$120.
SUPERVISORY COSTS =$2300
4. Recreation Leaders (52) should receive a minimnan of $2.50 per hour
and should be employed for at least 2 hours per day to allow for
sane preparation and clean-up time. Using this scale of $5 per
activity day, numerous caabinations are figured.
a. One 2 -hour activity once per week for 8 weeks plus 8 hours
preliminary meetings, school conferences, lesson plan prepar-
ation (24 hours per leader).
52 leaders X 24 hrs/ldr @ $2.50/hr
=$3120
5. Supplies -we do not have accurate records on supplies since many of
the items used were frim stock.
school, we arrive at $650.
Using our present key of $50 per
TOTAL FOR 13 SCHOOLS=$6070
13 schools X 4 activities X 15 kids/class=780 children
SUPERVISION $2300
LEADERS 3120
SUPPLIES 650
T6-0-70
A
I
. �p?1 pCOI ON7!I l"' M �MNN 1���pp1 H�,� i� yNy� '/, 1�•l1 O tr � H.
pO ttAa. o1.H tlf N V `a U M IO N M h1 M N f1
S ['1 a ►1 : Oyu 1.1 77 M
U
M^f O f1 H yN
t7 N M.t' < .0 iH a hl H �fl mi N
r .ra zaY N H / Ns• YUy V
�C y4 ;t�i;jl 4f 7 7
j �.t�•u 1M
k�r�1�ca•�e
x o
n 0 0
�
l D �
td
fi
>
P W A J Y U Y[ 1
yU p� W N r V V W p 1 P N U N .O W P• W? `� •' 1
a AV WM 1 co O W 0 I W
III I L Iw Li %DO V Y O N O W OP w 00
r O
. N N U U A O P •D
ww PAO.D A W N WUAA
•� P V V. o r = O I. I W O YON v I a W O w %0 N
�1 't NW lJ V r AU
D UVt� W O V N v P4
e U V CD O V V Y IC
I � o DIY-• r rArn N
rn NW
r� 4
u r �
%1
P w N V �D PP V W Oo CD w OD W w O N W .O OD V H
oov WM oD r W FOOPMOv N W w•O PU W r CC
•� ^ PO AY I A 0r.Om V P W Nr.O V rAUU N Y>
Cnl-.NP Y U NUY OUNOD V N ONU Oo ODN
N NNPV ID U V.O .OU O PO PONU.0 ADD P
U 4tj n�
P P V N
N 0 c UIDN co Pi co
A N N r
� rl A.D
U N P Y IO V N
� J V
N N
r r r >
N N N NPN P W N N A U O N P r C)
v W N u Ow Am cow" rU U.nUU 00 v
V PV La LA co 01 co N M 0 co NAN 0 0 V NOW b
V NIM V O V D) NON W NPU W Co A O W v V W
O W %0 00 V W .0 W Y• O A N m W r U Y r Kl Y• 0 .O
� �OOA P N N.Or NYOU OU.D IO ID Co W �
0 <m
1'1 W W W M N N A U
O W U N N U p v N N
A I o V P W O Y F P
Y
o r rPOY
A N
CIO,
N
tH N co O
V) M
1M
N I V N w 00 A 0o W N A U V N W W N
(Q
co W N P VP Y U A A O p N W O D O P M r H
h) O PMP / P Y M U v 00 N W
/ NAV W V V U IO P J
V O
P. A Y V Ip N A P .010 U N U W P W N P P W
O VM01 W v V Y V P A w N V 1 NCe Oo V W
P W 00 0 M O V co co .O A C b W •O N Y b o�
V W W U N Y P U
'
:4p V V U U
Y ID O Y
*00 W aD P
Y
O P m c v P
� TI N
N N
r Y
N W W O N O7
AW P V AA.D rC
pp W +I PwrONtO
C)
Wo
AOAtnrO i• o�r�.�.-•N mP mAo_vloo• �+n
T M
V U P W W O O .. O r Oo �O N N A V O VI V N W ID H
O V O A w O 1 O �• N W O V .o N U I/I C` R P U
C O V 0V IO"
H ooP N ID ca o rU
� H
O U .p A P O•
A � 19 No Io P.Or N
■
E
Recreation Program and Services
FY 76
* These activities were included in the January - June listing evaluated by Gommision
in early fall. The attendance estimate in most cases has been updated to reflect the
full year of 1973.
Account 01611.0 General Supervision
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Several services are performed by the office staff which are more than just the
normal administrative routine. This work is currently done by the full time super-
intendent, assistant superintendent and secretary, the permanent part-time clerk,
the part-time evening receptionist and the part-time summer clerk. The tasks
in-
clude registering people for activities such as classes, travel trips,leagues,
tournaments and other events; scheduling the use of the meeting rooms, the dark room,
handball court, ceramics workshop, tennis courts, ball diamonds and picnic shelters;
reserving and handing out sports and games equipment, santa suits,
and
a the recng reation
items; making change; caring for lost and found items (a big job);and
who use the Center with numerous requests from furnishing3to an answering service to
audio-visual equipment. To better these service needs and
dtopert rm the
peveonnein-
creasing clerical work load -brought on with expanding programs
forms and record keeping I am -recommending that the permanent 3/4 time clerical
position be made full time. This would enable the office to be open at 8 a.m. rather
than 9 a.m. if so desired.
* GROUP USE OF CE MR
Many public groups use'the Center for meetings, parties, rehearsals,
programa, etc. Groups affiliated with the Park and Recreation Department
(Aero Hawke, Community Theatre, Do -Si -Do Club, Family Campers, Old Capitol
Chorus, Iowa City Swim Club,Whitetail Bowmen, Babe Ruth Parents, Iowa -Coral
Belles) are not charged. Most others are charged a rental fee as per
Council resolution. Full and part time staff are involved as needed for
maintenance, scheduling, etc. Groups set up their own rooms. Attendance
estimate: 19,305
FIELD SUPERVISION
A service provided for department sponsored
and
softOrganiball
ed pleagues at s incl
Happy Hollow and Mercer Park from mid May m, Mon - Fri - June & July
Babe Ruth baseball - 190 boys age 13-15, 6 - 10 p.
Mens softball - 500 men - 6 - 10 p.m. Mon. - Fr1.May - July
Womens softball - 150 women - 6 - 8 P.M. Mon - Fri May - July
Senior Boys softball - 60 boys:- 6
- 8 p.m. Mon & Wed June & July
A part-time supervisor is hired for each area and the person at Mercer also does
considerable diamond maintenance in preparation for play.
Maintenance work is also
performed for other groups using the general area for ball such as the girls softball
league. Base and line equipment and material:is furnished.
Attendance estimate: 7,858.
Account 111612.2 Social Activities
*GOLDEN AGE CLUB
This program is not really a "club" but a social recreation program for
Henior citizens meeting regularly on Tuesday and Thursday afternoon in the
Social hall with an occasional special event and trip at other times. There
is no participant charge although a "Kitty" contribution raises a small amount
for coffee and refreshments. The group is directed by a volunteer with paid
assistance from staff. Attendance estimate: 4,239
*TEEN DANCES
This activity is not too popular at this time but in anticipation of
revival staff remains alert to trends and desires of youth. Dances have
been planned inside and out for several years with no or minimum charge to
participants. The social hall in the Canter and the Mercer parking lot have
been used. Planned by staff with paid part time supervision. Inside dances
require 2 uniformed police. Greatest expense is for the band.
Attendance estimate 553.
Account 111612.3 Arts and Craftsp Drama. Hobbies
*ARTS b CRAFTS CLASSES
Organized group instruction is offered to youth and adults in a variety
of subjects popular at any one point in time and limited by apace and equip-
ment. A full time recreation program supervisor devotes considerable time
to this activity with a 10 week session in the fall and another in the spring
as well as a summer series. Classes meet once per week during the school
year either in the afternoon or evening utilizing the craft room and the
meeting rooms as needed. Some classes will meet outside occasionally. A
proffessional trained instructor is hired for each class paid for by the
participants. Participants also purchase their own supplies and most hand
tools. An exhibit of work is held every spring. Attendance estimate: 2,125
11
•
* CRAFT 6 PHo'rO ROOM USE
The craft and photo rooms are made available to the adult public for a
minlmum charge for supplies and special services during the hours when the
Center Is open to the public and a class is not in session. Staff is
encouraging this type of use as being part of our primary function.
Attendance estimate: 727.
W *FOOTLITERS
A children's drama program which has not been too well received.
Two different age groups of children from lower and upper elementary
met one afternoon per week and finished with an original production for
the public. A well qualified drama instructor was employed and parents
were asked to help with costuming. A different approach should be
studied for this program to be meaningful and progressive. No charge was
made to participants. Attendance estimafe: 764.
Account 01612.4
*ARCHERY
Physical Activities - Recreation Center
The rifle range in the Center has been
use by the public. On Monday and Wednesday
year supervision is employed to assist youth
instruction is provided withoutcharge on an
times when the Center is open to the public
for archery. Attendance estimate: 1,209.
* RIFLE
adapted to permit archery
evening during the school
and adults. Equipment and
informal basis. At other
arrangements can be made
The rifle range is open during public use hours of the Center. On
Tuesday and Thursday evening during the school year a qualified supervisor
is employed to assist youth and adults at no cost. Minors using the range
must be accompanied by an adult except when supervisor is present and all
minors must have a release signed by parents. Shells and targets may
be purchased at cost and rifles are on loan at no cost.
Attendance estimate: 1,166.
*GYM 6 GAME ROOM -PUBLIC USE
The use of the gym and game room and the exercise room as well as the
rifle range is a major part of the service of the Recreation Division. Dur-
ing the school year these facilities are open to the public and supervised
about 75 hours per week. The hours with some group restrictions are
generally from 11 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday - Thursday; 11 a.m. to 12 midnight
on Friday; 1 p.m. to 10 p.m. Saturday and Sunday. Part time staff is
employed in varied capacities to assist the full time staff in the super-
vision of the facility use. Evening and weekend staffs are usually 3 or
4 people to dispense equipment, teach as needed, discipline as needed,
encourage participation, make change, handle first aid, perform janitorial
tasks, answer questions and be, as -helpful to the public as time and duties
4
permit. One of our front lines of Public Relations. Activities possible are
numerous but those generally taking place are: table tennis, pocket billiards,
bumper pool, table games, TV viewing, cards, basketball, volleyball, roller skating,
Jogging, exercising, tumbling and punching bag. These facilies are open to adults
and youth 5th grade and older and younger children when accompanied by an adult.
During June, July and August the Center hours are abbrieviated by closing on
weekends. Hours are Monday - Friday from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. and 7 - 10 p.m. The
Center is also budgeted to close after the second week in August allowing time for
major cleaning operations. The staff is limited to one 40 hour a week part-time
person and one 30 hour part-time person. These people work quite independantly of
the full time staff who are more than occupied with the responsibilities of the
summer programs.
Summer attendance estimate: 10,426
Full year attendance estimate: 65,407.
* HANDBALL
The public uses,the handball court for both handball and paddleball
from 9 a.m. to closing on week days and from 1 to 10 p.m. on week ends.
There is no participant charge and they must furnish their own racquets.
The facility is scheduled a day at a time with a one hour limit.
Attendance estimate: 49676
® # A VOLLEYBALL FOR WOMEN
The gym is opened for women to play volleyball on an informal basis
Wednesday and Friday morning during the school year. No particular staff
time is involved. A baby care service is provided during this time.
Attendance estimate: 656
*BASKETBALL - SENIOR BOYS
Sixty to eighty high school boys register without charge and are
drafted by volunteer coaches on teams to play a schedule of games on
Monday evening at the Center. Referees and score keepers are hired to
officiate and the league program is organized and supervised by full
time staff. Coaches schedule practice sessions throughout the season
from late November thru February. Attendance estimate: 267.
*BASKETBALL - SENIOR GIRLS
Last year (73-74 season) probably because of the school varsity
competition there were an insufficient number of girls registered to
have a league. Funds are budgeted for this activity the same as for the
boys. It is quite possible that as the interest grows in the city that
the program will be revived.
® *BASKETBALL - MEN
About 220 men play in two leagues at the Center on Monday and Wednesday
evening November - February. Sponsored teams pay an entry fee to cover the
cost of officials and trophies. The leagues are organized and supervised
by full time staff. Attendance estimates 1696.
U
E
E
Two leagues open to all adult males playing at the Center on Thursday
night November - April. Sponsored teams pay an entry fee to cover the
coat of officials hired and supervised by.full time staff who also organize
the league. Last season 160 men participated. Attendance estimate: 1446.
*FITNESS - WOMENS CLASS
A registered class including physical conditioning exercises and
activities open to all adult women and meeting in the gym on Tuesday
and Thursday morning January - March. A fee was charged to pay for a
part time"instructor who was hired and supervised by full time staff.
Women could attend either one or both days. Attendance estimate: 786
A6 4(PRE-SCHOOL GYM
During the winter months the gym is open on mornings before 11 a.m.
when activities are not in session for parents and organized groups to
bring pre school age children to run and play in the gym. No particular
staff involvement; equipment furnished by City. Attendance estimate: 262.
71 :UABY CARE
A service provided in the social hall to anyone using the Center
during the morning hours Tuesday - Friday. A charge of 50c per child
is assesed to pay for sitters hired and supervised by full time staff.
Playthings are provided by City. Attendance estimate: 748.
*PADDLEBALL CLASS
Open to all adult wewonwho paid a fee for instruction. Instructor
hired and supervised by full time staff. Attendance estimate: 32.
a1E*HUFFLEBOARD
Open to all senior citizens on Monday a.m. in the gym during the winter
months at no cost to participants. Supervised by full time staff as needed.
Attendance estimate: 60.
SPECIAL EVENTS
Several special events are held by the Department during the year. Some are
annual and some are not. Those conducted by full and part-time staff were: pool
tournaments, family table tennis tournament, garden clinic, arts and crafts exhibit
in cooperation with Iowa City Craft Guild`, synchronized swimming show, photo exhibit,
Halloween costume parade, playground swim fest, playground track meet, playground
pint size carnival, children's drama performance, playground field day, playground
talent show, summer cultural arts series in City Park and a free throw shooting
contest.
Attendance estimate: 2179
*PLAY DAY
This is a varied activity program open to all children in grades 1 - 6
on Saturday morning and public school vacation days October - April in the
Center. Activities include crafts, table games, quiet games, active games,
basketball, tumbling, apparatus play, roller skating, archery, air rifle
target shooting and others. Part time leaders and supervisors art hired,
trained and supervised by full time staff.
Attendance estimate: 6748
Account 11613.1 Babe Ruth Baseball
BABE RUTH BASEBALL
A baseball league for boys 13 - 15 years. Jointly sponsored by the City
and a parents organization which is affiliated with the Parks and Recreation
Department and a national organization. The City provides the playing fields,
supervision, umpires and liaison with parents board. Parks & Recreation Department
staff prepares schedule, issues equipment and other misc. administration and clerical
duties. The parents board provides uniforms, coaches, insurance and equipment
® (City provided equipment before 1974) The parents board raises money by donations,
entry fee and concession stand. Fourteen teams with 190 boys play 98 games
Mon. - Fri. evening at Mercer Park during June and July.
Attendance estimate: 2,185
Account 61613.3 Winter Sports
*ICE SKATING
Open skating without charge to all citizens during season at City
and Mercer Parks. Ice is maintained and snow removed by Park Division.
Part time supervision is hired and supervised by Recreation Division during
evenings, week ends and holidays. Warming houses are maintained and
available during supervised.hours. Maintenance costs are not available
and not reflected in program costs. Attendance estimate: 3337.
*SKI TRIPS
Open to general public who paid expenses for bus and skiing at
Chestnut Mountain, Galena, I11. Part time and full time staff supervised.
18 Two trips. Attendance estimate: 124.
An organized baseball program for boys 8 - 12 years operated entirely by a
private, non-profit organization not affiliated with the Parks and Recreation
Department. Games played at City Park in early evening during late May, June,
July and early August. Fields maintained by Parks Division and City provides
funds originally committed by Council for umpires.
Attendance estimate: 7,000
Account 111613.5 Softball League Play
-)K * GIRUS aFrBAt_
SENIOR BOYS
A league activity for boys in grades 9 - 12 playing in the early evening at
Mercer - Southeast area. Four to six teams, 60 - 80 boys supervised by part-time
and organized full time staff. No fee charged and all equipment except personal
furnished by City.
Attendance estimate: 281
MEN
Three - 8 team leagues with 500 men playing slow pitch -ball at Mercer Park
and Happy Hollow during May, June and July both twilight and night ball. The program
® is organized by full time staff and supervised by part-time. City also provides
lights and most equipment except personal. Team sponsors pay for officials and
trophies. All teams must have at least 51% Iowa City residents.
Attendance estimate: 4,371
WOMEN
A six team league of 120 women playing fast pitch ball at Mercer Park in the
early evening during June and July. The program is organized by full time staff
and supervised by part-time staff. City provides most equipment. Team sponsors
pay for officials and trophies.
Attendance estimate: 912
Account #1613.6 Tennis
TENNIS CLASSES
Lessons are conducted for adults in the spring and for adults and youth in
3rd grade or older in two different summer sessions. All spring classes are held
at City Park and summer classes are held at both City Park and City High. Classes
are usually filled and the demand for adult classes is greater than we can meet
during the evening hours. Instruction is limited to two of the six courts in order
to allow space for public play. In 1973-471.oeople registered for the 10 lessons
courses. The program is organized and supervised by the full time staff who hire
part-time instructors. A fee is charged to pay for the instruction.
® Attendance estimate: 2,989.
Account 111613.7 Football
FOOTBALL
A flag football program for fifth and sixth grade boys and girls playing on
Saturday morning at 7 different locations with 14 teams. Organized and supervised
by full time staff with part-time leadership for each group. A low key program to
teach skills, sportsmanship and to enjoy the game.
Attendance estimate: 1,683
Account 111613.8 Playgrounds
;K * PLAYGROUNDS
A long standing summer program conducted in the various neighborhoods in the
afternoons for 8 weeks. (This program was cut in 1974 by eliminating evening activities
and some leadership.) A variety of activities are planned for 12-14 different
areas using school grounds, parks and playgrounds. All activities are supervised
® by trained part-time leaders and include crafts, games, drama, stories, music,
sports and special events. The program is geared to children in K - 12 grades
but mostly appeals to,lower elementary. In 1973 - 1567 children registered.
Part-time staff of 35 - 40 are hired, trained and supervised by full time staff
who also do a great deal with program planning., Considerable equipment and supplies
are needed to conduct this activity. Playgrounds open Monday - Friday.
Attendance estimate: 24,419
Account #1614.1 City Park Pool & 1614.2 Mercer Park Pool
PUBLIC SWIMMING
These two outdoor pools are open from the close of school in early June until
school re -opens in late August. The hours of operation for the public are from
1 until 9:30 p.m. although City Park was forced to close early in 1974 because
floodlighting was not available. The pools are supervised by the full time staff
and operated by a large part-time staff consisting of a manager, assistant, life
guards, attendants, cashier and maintenance personnel.
Attendance estimate: 113,379
SWIMMING INSTRUCTION (see #1614.3)
COMPETITION (see 111614.3)
r
n
LJ
11
Account #1614.3 Recreation Center Pool
PUBLIC SWIMMING - Summer
The Center pool is open to adults Mon. -Fri. from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. and to the
general public daily from 2 - 9 p.m. This schedule starts at the close of school
in early June and continues until late.Auguat when school opens. The pool is
supervised by full time staff and operated by part-time life guards.
Attendance estimate: 21,454.
*PUBLIC SWIMMING - School Year.
The Center swimming pool is open to the public for a fee seven days
a week at varying times. The hours are Monday — Friday 9 a.m. - 2 p.m.
and 7 - 9 p.m., Saturday 9 - 11 a.m. and l - 5 p.m. (except when closed
at 3 p.m. for scrim meets), Sunday l - 9 p.m. Part time life guards
and managers are employed and supervised by the full time staff. Consider-
able day time adult use is for lap'swimming. Many families use.the pool
in the evenings and weak ends as well as mothers with pre school children
in the daytime hours. Attendanceestimate: 38,541
*SWIMMING
Group lessons are open to the public for a small fee to pay for
instruction. Free instruction is available for low economic persons.
Classes are offered during the week in the morning, afternoon and evening
for pre-school children thru adult in all ability levels including life
saving and synchronized. Qualified American iced Crone Water Safety Instructors
are hired on -a part time basis and supervised by full time staff. Attendance
estimate: 23,083
COMPETITION - SUMMER
The pool is used by our affiliate the
November - March; school teams from Regina
High Schools; P.E. classes from Central Jr.
use the pool from 6 - 8 a.m. and 3-- 5 p.m.
Part time staff is only provided for masts
afternoon. Attendance estimate: 8494.
Iowa City Swim Club 5 - 7 p.m.
(girls only), City and West
'Hi. and Regina. School teams
Monday - Friday November - Feb.
on Thursday evening and Saturday
COMPETITION & PHYSICAL EDUCATION - SCHOOL YEAR
Swim Club uses the Center pool from 6 - 8 a.m. and City Park pool from 8:30 -
11 a.m. Monday - Saturday. High School girl's teams use City Park pool and Mercer
pool is used by Regina in late Augusut. In August and September Mercer Pool is
used by P.E. classes from Southeast. Some use is also made of the Center pool by
P.E. and special education programs from Central and Regina.
Attendance estimate: 15,404
40
E
10
•
Account 111615.1 Misc. Outside Activities
GOLF
A men's golf league is organized and supervised by full time staff for about
30 men. Matches are played during the summer at Finkbine course. Men pay an entry
fee used for purchasing trophies and they also pay their own green fees.
Attendance estimate: 200
TRIPS
Numerous trips are conducted for the general public during the year such as
canoeing, ball games, museum, caveing, horseback ride, etc. Organized by full
time staff and led by part-time staff. Participants pay all costs.
Attendance estimate: 172
FARMERS MARKET
A farmers market is opened on Saturday mornings from July - September under
the College Street bridge. Supervised by full time staff. No City expenditure.
Attendance estimate: 4,575.
Account 111615.2 School Centers
*ASERP (After School Elementary Recreation Program)
Four elementary schools scheduled for different activities for grades
1 - 6 for 8 weeks meeting after school. Activities include physical, arts
and crafts and interpretive. Part time program directors are hired and
supervised by full time staff. A fee is charged to pay for staff and
materials used. Schools provide facilities without charge; City provides
equipment. Attendance estimate: 1426.
Expansion of the program is recommended to include all City elementary schools
with 4 activities per week. Some full time staff administration and supervision.
A 40 hour week part-time person needed to plan and supervise the program with
assistance from 2 supervisors and a number of leaders. Fee charged to cover leader-
ship and materials.
*WEEKEND GYMS
All elementary school gyms open on Saturday morning and afternoon
for all elementary children to use for physical activities without charge.
Southeast Jr. Hi. gym open on Sunday afternoon for all adults, Junior and
Senior High youth without charge. Activities directed and supervised by
part time staff. Full time staff hires and supervises. .City provides
equipment. Open Jan. to April. Attendance estimate: 6103.
n
LJ
* CFIRTSTMAS GYMS
Four elementary schools and Central Junior High school gyms are open
morning and afternoon for elementary, Junior and Senior High youth during
Christmas vacation period for physical activities. No charge to participants.
City provides equipment and part time program director. Full time staff
supervisor. Attendance estimate: 441.
*BASKETBALL LEAGUE - WOMEN
A league open to all adult women who form their own teams and play on
Monday evening at Southeast Jr. High School November - February. Sponsors
fee pays for part time officials. Organized and supervised by full time
staff. Attendance estimate: 312.
*BASKETBALL LEAGUE - MEN
A fast break league open to all adult males playing in teams on
Monday and Wednesday evening.at West High School November - February.
Sponsors fee pays for part time officials. Organized and supervised by
full time staff. Attendance estimate: 514.
* VOLLEYBALL LEAGUE - WOMEN
® A new program open to all adult women playing league games on Wednesday
evening at Southeast Jr. Hi. School. Sponsors will pay an entry fee to
cover the cost of the officials. Organized and supervised by full time
staff. Attendance estimate: 720.
� �' �v�
NHOSEOT
TEMS RELATED APPL!QANTOURINCE THIS IS .APPLICATION(S)CAREPTOHBE SF LLED PLICPLE SET YPEOOR PRINT
NAME OF APPLICANT: ADDRESS: 33SN1
Charles R. Walden 730.E. Bloomington St. 33 97
NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: AqA—SoZfE an acre PRESENT RIA
ZONING
SjREETSADj?1R� ?RePfl9,P ffTY LOCATION: ZONINGMl
OWNER ADDRESS:. PHONE:
Charles R, Walden 710 E Bloomington St. 338-1297
ATTORNEY: ADDRESS PHONE:
ENGINEER: ADDRESS: PHONE:
i
OTHER: ADDRESS PHONE:
UM
TYPE OF APPLICATION
✓ PLEASE CHECK 1, ,Six copies of preliminary plat
REZONING FROWR� <rs >>< ".>'Y 2. Six copies of final plan
TO: Ml
3. Reproducible & 5 copies of final plan
>'> SUBDIVISION "' f>>,y: >:v 4. Location Map
PRELIMINARY PLAN '
' SUBDIVISION " `{ `f<.
5.Legal Description
' FINAL PLAN `,,, k<�' <` 6. Dedication of land for public use
}`> LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL ' " , 7. Resolution for approval by Council
PRELIMINARY $. Legal papers consisting of:
' LARGE SCALE RESIDENTIAL ''.:: a. Attorneys opinion
FINAL; b. Encumbrance bond certificate
LGE. SCALE NON-RESIDENTIAL' "'"' C. Statement of County Treasurer
PRELIMINARY. �f.. �, s «
d. Statement of Clerk of Court
`LGE. SCALE FINAL NON-RESIDENTiAL
@. Statement of County Recorder
!•:..i�1fi f o
q' PLANNPRELIMINARYOPMENT:.r<2%/>r,
f f. Statement of Owner & spouse
</ ,
v g. Waiver of paving
;n'« PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT , h• Certificate concerning improve-
... ?
FINAL r$;r ,:::Y ments
#4> PLANNED COMMERCIAL ""'-'~''t'' 3%''`' 9• Existing site plan
ZONE 10. Development site plan
A.}
N?; 11. Statement of intent by developer
VACATINGS 12. petition to pave abutting streets
.� 13 Report on economic feasibility
ANNEXATIONROM,
14. Report on effect of PC on surrounding
44 sib 7:s,, property
:�•15• Report on impact of traffic by PC on
surrounding streets
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 16. seven additional copies of plat are
desired but not required
FILE NUMBER: Z - j ,2
FEE PAID: AMOUNT DATE
wnm THIS IS AN APPLICATION
APPLICjgION ACCEPTED BY.: D th FORM ONLY. A LISTING
NAME DATEC) OF OTHER SUBMISSION
0 C I MATERIALS MAY
BE
OBTAINED FROM THE
"�f';:•f,-:?%f:7:%/::•fi:: ''��,•/ter-.: >:
/,f:��!fi'�fG'%/��/f,,fl ;'�. %�:{;mof/i�' i,/✓;ft,f`f%� l°/":�f...'.?�ii:f:f,.�t<r>Yvf�i:,�%�l//`f"'f.:/•..''/�l..• :�.��},,y'!�Y,�i„i.f`Ff•S�if:'/>:r��k.:•f:.y�f•:b. ;%f/f.'r,�• /.f•�f%'f/.fYfl� :a � F�,a � R..S T O
`
U S PLANNING DIVISION.
CITY CLERK
M�NN
l V
BLUE:APPLICANT
FiVID
G'yu'
�1
ALA,-- -- If FULL
PREPARED By .
I-vact coya, � � p
Of jolq soNi COITI�TT�', fl�VA
�.bSLratt of ?,�tjQ to the following described premises, situated iu Johnson County, Iowa, to Wit-:
Be -ginning at a point 512.5 feet west of the southeast
corner of Section 21, `township 79 North, Range b hest of the 5th
42 min. east 124.5 feet to the point of
P.M., thence north 3 deg.
'beginning of the tract here to be described; From said point of
beginning, thence north 3 deg. 42 min. east 125.66 -feet, thence
w-sterly along the southerly line of Lot Ass shown on plat of
survey of land in the southeast quarter of Section ganaed6t�est he
of
northeast quarter of Section 28,1orrnship 79 North, g
the 5th P.M. according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book
1F, page 344, Plat Records_ of Johnson County, Iowa, _160._859 feet to
the public road, thence south 49 deg. 13 min. west 113.feet
thence south 11 deg. 31 min. west 15 feet, thence easterly to the
point of beginning. , 1-
part of COagresaloaal Town.
Johnson County, Iowa, is situated is the south East
Johnson Pam of Iowa and cotzs;sts of a p
ship 77 anau o ess 5—&7 Snd 8 West of h Fifth established
Merid n which 1s eemblishad moutht m the m uth Of the
Ar;causaa, -
Arlrausaa Iitv,t.
A SECTION OF LAND --W. ACRES
;A rod i3 16?=- feet.
A chain is 66 feet or 4 rods or 100 links.
A link is 7.02 inches.
A mile is 320 rods, 80 chains, or 5,280 feet.
A square rod is 272% square feet.
An acre contains 43,560 square feet.
An acre contains 160 square rods.
An acre is nbout 208% feet square.
An acre is 8 rods wide by 20 rods long or
any two numbers (of rods) whose product
is 160.
25,cI25 feet equals .0717 of an acre.
CEDE
Sectional DUP
of a
Township
t
With Adjoining Sections
A SECTION OF LAND --W. ACRES
;A rod i3 16?=- feet.
A chain is 66 feet or 4 rods or 100 links.
A link is 7.02 inches.
A mile is 320 rods, 80 chains, or 5,280 feet.
A square rod is 272% square feet.
An acre contains 43,560 square feet.
An acre contains 160 square rods.
An acre is nbout 208% feet square.
An acre is 8 rods wide by 20 rods long or
any two numbers (of rods) whose product
is 160.
25,cI25 feet equals .0717 of an acre.
CEDE
Sectional DUP
of a
Township
With Adjoining Sections
3G
31 333
34
35 36 31
1
6 5 14
13
2 I l l
6
12
17 I 8
I 0
110
111 112 17
t•
13I
is 17I16I15I14I13
x
aee :, t
o
1S
24
10 20
12l
122
123 12.1
19
25
30 120
12S
127
12f, 125
30
32
I'33
13-t
1 35 1 36 1
31
1
6 5
4
13
2 I 1
G
&0 rods
80 acres
20 chsiry
OF
SECTION
le chains
330 it.
t-
5 acres t
r acr"
''
TO rix.s
ch.
20 acres
t•
.. io
x
aee :, t
o
` 10
ex. • t
660 feet
40
ncr a
V
�1
Y
1.520
feet
�k se<tiw
Corner
100 scree
do chnias. 150 reds or 2.$40 fc,t
SEi7ItITY ABSTRACT COiY MANY, IO :VA CITY. Ifl rVA
•: R�•k�j..+;� L �iyCi�t� f. r 2
- 2` r � �.1�xY` � S y Y + ✓
� ' 'y .!s
. of
Plat of a survey for J. S. Charles, �:pril 4, 1873_
Recorded April 11, 1873, 3ook 36,pGoe 322.
Survey of E- SE Sec,21 & Nr NEz Sec.28 and Lots
Sac,22
and Lot 8, Sec.27, all in Twp, 79 111.9 R.6 :
... .. ..�...___..__-•.�.,,n..o-,�...--__ �._r•��- •^. .-s�� a '^"^� _+� —�.— — — _
� l�
�l
.J L. i /> C> �' 7 S CC GD"r r+p
Plat Book 4, page 344.
1y
T
y
Y
C
LW
Sits' f S F Cu_ 25"m ; I
%S'- C.
z
0
3
n
m
O
OZA:
n
•
mm
0
ro
n
O
O
m
z
0
�/E y5cc.z8-�y-6
I.,.ES 1gr-. "
14
J
-- �7
7o.140
FCC,
7o.140
7?!- C •
.Y
se
11
Y
1 y�
-ts.- z 7 7.4 2 �,
onfi 3s�—
�o70L/ s4rc2a7�6�
1.4
I-
0
0
`2
y
X
f
ii
;f
Plat Book
4, gage
344.
�/E y5cc.z8-�y-6
I.,.ES 1gr-. "
14
J
-- �7
7o.140
FCC,
7o.140
7?!- C •
.Y
se
11
Y
1 y�
-ts.- z 7 7.4 2 �,
onfi 3s�—
�o70L/ s4rc2a7�6�
1.4
I-
0
0
`2
y
X
ii
;f
Plat Book
4, gage
344.
- _ r. '3 y�..t_ t �--.S..r �—�-�c'.M'Tw�•�Tr.�rvif-F.•. �...—._i._ r ��� fi>..
'_f 3 -
'- •
� ! -•_
_
?� z to
-
�. .a r _': -.i s:
_
-u
.1«�
PERSONAL STATEMLMTS FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS
A1_chough I consider all three proposals for the Low Income
housing Project to be more than acceptable, I believe the
Old Capitol Proposal is more closely aligned with the ideas
I have in mind for the project. Therefore, I recommend that
we urge the Council to accept their proposal.
I wholeheartedly support Mrs. Branson in her endeavors to
make Iowa City a better place in which to live, through her
very capable handling of the position of chairperson of
the Housing Commission.
0. -
Mildred Bosserman
Member
Su,T�rested Criteria to Employ in the Evaluation of Proposod
Senior Citizen Low -Rent Housing
The r..ommcni;s lwhich I am about to make are my own and have not;
been endorsed. by the entire Housinz Commission, nor. have I s0ug�h t
i_' -s =indorsement or the endorsement of any indi_v_idual and/or. any
: 1'Oup.
I find it necessary -to slake this statement in order -to brinJ;
Ct f•or•,� -the public the real issues which the housing Commi ;;;1.011
h; s failed to deal with and ,yet which have had a si.-nifi.cant iiii-pnet
on the process of evaluation for the three proposed senior citizen
I
ousing projects.
( 1) In-1d..-quacy of criteria employed for evalua.t:i.on
Although we have available to us -the LHA checklist, which
you have seen -today, this .form is totally inadequate as a basis
for ;Selecting- the best proposal. It is a process -oriented form
containin- at least 10 questions (out of approximately 30) wllicll
request cc 'tification of the fact that certain documents have
been subini l -ted. This type of question and most of the questions
on the LHA checklist do little -to get at the :real issue - HOW
ArPROPRIAT11 ARF 1'Hi;SE UNITS AS A HOIrIE FOR SENIOR AND
H:?NDICAPPl D? I t is this point for which wC, have no suhs-tan4.i.rtl
cr'i teria. The only assistanceoffered us by the nous;-11� Ili rector
wh
as se sur;gest:l on that we conform ourselves of the cOn"te"ts of 1:11(,
r,?gill l'?11?11ts contained in the fV'ini mum Property Vii: 11 _r d;_ and 'tho
ti..on2
Housing Assistance PaymentsI'ro�7r�m -_ i�nw _onsi:ruCi:i on
_ro:-ram :i�lndbook. Of course these documents are helpful, but 0111\1
t0 <? Ct>rt3ill el'tent. The 1'+T'rS are building and physiCa.11_\r Or; ni:i'd
it:i:Ont address.ino- itself -to the human factors.
I thin'.c th-t an evaluation process based 011-1-Y on these
ca i.`eri.a is entirely too narrow and provincial. Granted, the
not been revised thus far, but HUD as of .last Au--ust,
_ _o " 1i ed the i-moortance of goin`r, beyond a mere eval.ua.tion of
''':3 cuilding -to look at the prorram and services -to be COnt,3ln��(l
n r x oi�osed hou:; in;- developments. As stated in the l:7r5, these
rc lair r�enia are only minimal and -there is nothing which shnu)d
restrain the LHA from setting_;- higher goals for itself. Therefore
i.y Point is that -the Housing Commission should have set hirfher
st:lnd gds fur itself instead of beim; discourag-ed to do this 1-1
't iousill Director erd :-ome Housinz= Commis -ion -aeml,er. s. C
t,C `il-it !Iie Cit.v `.'ouncil r,--pond6 t0 '�.I1e 1,'O,i�^r trio.. nI h01:: ;1,_
t.il t1 a 1•,uil��'in, but •,.; a hone and a s,,t of se- ;•io,^, mrd
a71 :,'.ace There poo --,le live! not die.
-21
n
-.,'r-��,r 1 U.L- e vaiva-tl on
Al.t.hou,-h the Housing Director and the Housing Commission
i'oll.o; ed the straight and, narrow path in this evalua.ti_on prose:::
i leave tried to look at this in a broader context and therei'nrc ,
:r^ considered 5 factors to be of trtntos t i.r:portance in i:en t, i;i vc.7 ,
'--Olec tin,; a developer.
('r-) Financial feasibility
1v r. eason for starting here is because the proposal mist hi
� .10 -to r.;,ke it financially if 1ow-income eeni.or citizens jnd
h �ndic<api�ed persons are going; to be assured of -the ava.ila.bi_li ty
o tl!C-e units. The usual procedure is that a complete fi nand ci. t
.is not required it this point, a.nd therefore tha t
mesal ilou-ing Authorities rarely consider the herefore hat
o=' pror,oaals before them. It is
common kno:led,c -that itsy ride throu h the typical IHA and, why not,when .i ibni
very l.itt:1C
information is required. and when commission members led
ar councils are inexperienced in housing_;_ matters. All three
d0velopels havecommentedon the scope of our questions and al.l
i that they have never before had to submit so much de-thij
t',:is early in the process. I think this accounts for
Old C :iii t;tl's
Llure -to submit a complete financial statement even when 2.•c-
cluested by the LHA (because they don't have to) and for the
al:Iles scs contained in -the Knutson statement; (because u: vaIly
-hc GHA .and the developer do not consider it -to be a'serious'
-:nd realistic s1:a.te7nent at this early date).
After explaining the developer's point of view, i{ ; s tic�ee,:,,try
to e ,plain t;i13i I think should be the point of view of the }-lou:>i nr:
C07MIssi.on and the 1JHA. Althourrh, supposedly, it is not our
r^'>[:onsi.bi.lity at the local level to dertl seriously with this matter -1
l cannot liel.p thinking how absolutely fool i h altar is. There:t'orc,
T >u,r�;est that the folloviinC items be .t:hou711-tfully considered
fortirardincr our tentative selection to ;-IUD.
1, Compare the cost per unit and the cost per square ioo-i:
for each dwelling unit with the cont0nts of each
N•:ith special reference to land costs, siteTlYi. r. �rovrt cnt:
pe O1 building proposed, building ,•race and
i 1 cl.ud-.ns- provi-ion for service areas, unit. space nd
-Floor t�1 ns, design and architectural trea-':m91,t, reT1+1
P ld THS; SUiTABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL FOR SEiI:LOR
tD H_NDICAPPf�D PERSONS.
$"pat will be "the impact (n the Knutson proposal -if i_-L-
i,"clud.es air conditioning ; what ;vill be the impact on
{'� Old Capital- proposal if it Ccr.�n?lies ;:,ith reque: `s
nlarFe the units, rearranzl;e a kitchen t,:all, provi ?o
--other laundry room , more storac-e ;ease, and mor(? oj'
Mix of bathtubs and shot:,ers, and t^hat Will be the
P::i dstates' proposal i -,-it complies ;vith requests -to
r'0 :mane~e a kitchen wall. and ,rolkri.de a mix of bathtui ti
(.:l,ich need -to be made more accessible) and
There are g ring discrepancies anion;" cost fit ures 1yhir_h
require careful attention. The Housing -Commission has not been
provided with any expert` advice= o1i. this .issue. We have been" moi,r.
::illinc- to speculate and gossip about the 'financial feasibility
of the proposals rather than seek or request hard corcjfaci:s from
'he "experts"'. I hope the City Council will. not feel 'threatened
b,r not h -wing immediate knowledge on -this point, but ]:rll do i t
I- to seek -t:he requisite assistance in order to make -an objective
valuation.
(b) Unit plans
Since last July when Iowa City received tiJord of the a.l Loco ti i>n
of 62 units Of low -rent hou:<ing, "the Housing Director. has
tliore ::ar; little the Housing; Commission would need tc coral i.dei i n
evaluating; -the proposals except -to certify their conformance with
r!ini.n?um HUD requirements and special THA requ:i.rem�nts. He frenuontl.v
rar_inded the Commission and the elderly that no one ,,:as go- to
bu'ld lu:rury apartments, that only low -rent housing 1a;oinr to
F- built. He further reminded the Commission and those i.n att:encinncc
2.1, Commission meetings that there ]:rare few alternatives available
U-) be considered in the quality of desiLn, both interior and exterior.
r!_s sur,rresti_on was to f;o down to the library and look -t}.rou^'h a
i �_-a b -sic floor plans because they were all alike. This
LO me tli it low -rent housing must be plain with a minimum number
Or fea.ture:s and most disgusting, that poor seniorci.-ti
..cr.s and.
`inc'.4aned do not e deserya bet -o
1•• r.
^^t 'iCn
a.t they
:•ccently a Housing Commission mrr;l'• r, ':O t my-, l.f,
-t-hat he thought one of the most imuor- LI -lit -Lhin_-s •::e should
conider In our evaluation is the layout arad interior aIIl:l
or each unit. I find it saran e that in the 1 •
t i.7s been down -played and an implicit denial b,y ^op;e Con77 :;i.on
^ 'rib•ert as having little significant bearin:_; on 011r eva_lual;ion.
Keening in mind that my base line for evaluation has 1 -eon
i opp,nPRIATE ARE: THESE UNITS AS A HOI,'_'E FOR SENIOR, CI7.'IZi_?NS !LINT)
1:__ HANDICAPPED, I think the floor plans do have sig-nificart
b::a ring on the evaluation. Therefore I su`-;est that Co1;nCil
11Ci;1oers c^n` ider the following factors when lookin:- at 't.).e
a :)u rtr•,ents :
1. 'otal apartment floor space (net or gross) .
2. Furniture to be contained with in, the apartmen-ts -
ow does older furniture of most seni.vr citizens
with furniture sizes shown on floor pl^r1s (I'UD's minirnl.m
sized furniture)? Ifthe furniture is lair -e and bull:v
how, will this effect convenient and com>>or-table accc :;:;
and mobil. ; t::- with in the unit by a person •;hose m1�' c r unci
: �nsory functions may be impr.i^etz'?
3. ccess -to kitchen and bathroom -
Ts there comfortable and convenient access, includin,- t• 7'n
:round space for wheelchairs? Hei ,-ht of kitchen
roes a person in a �:heelchair have convenient acce:;-: 1,
the sink, facilitated by open space beneath? 7„11at
?bout access to medicine cabinet and other stora,e -
above shoulders when seated or at shoulder level? }'c�1,•
accessible are tubs and showers, lavatories, .-.rid toi It tc:?
corm. nors : -; wnaT are -the
and within;`.them?.
y located. in bathrooms -.and
sizes of doors into apartments,
z�. Flexibility of dwelling space over -t:.i_me -
What happens -to the person who is mobi..l.e c.;ho?� triki.n« c;n
residence in one of the=se units, but then temporaril.,y
or permanently needs vialking assistance or a l:,lcelch;cir?
Will. -t-he lack of .f.lexibility within the uni-1; (deli. :natc,d
only Por mobile persons or handicapped persons vs, c•np:ac. i'ty
to provide comfortable and convenient access i.n -,)I
for senior citizens and -the handicapped) force
to move? (Studies indicate that moving by .Den.ior ci.It;i.scns
considerably shortens their lifespan..) Or
flexibility within units by movable walls r. eli eve
-the monotonous uniformity of the apartments, thereby
promoting individuality in a multi-residcnti.al. at;mo:,t ilern,
as well as meet the needs of the elderly w;iich char. -e
over tame.
5. Amount and location of storage and knick knack :3pc3.CL-
available wit:lin -the auartmentq.
6. Location of windows and
view while se. ted - tvhai:
floor? Are they easy to
from beneath the window
a sittins- position'?
capability for provi.di.n ; ,13.
are heights of windows from the
open? Does anything: protrude
thereby impairing. -t-he view from
7. Attention f�ri.veri to li �Thting and sound conditions -
'Uhat h-.� s been done to reduce glace from r:iruiocs <znd 0 -'LI -ter
surfaces (in order to red.__ce falls) and to reduce :?udi.t.ory
distractions?
(c) i''anagcment - tenant relationship
Perhaps the most difficult factor -to evoLlua t:e ,!t this t,oi.nt.
ye the most crucial, I think, is assurinf, a hi_^;h o jtc>. ; i ty li vi n'-
e„vi.ronment is *the attitude of the manacxoment; toward -thc tcn,lr-t.
I s,_igc;est that -the City Council_ read each mana,_;ement: l,lan .in nr;ic�r
to ^et a feel for management attitude, A proposal can 11`lv:l 1_111
the .fine features it %-rants, but ulti m-1.tely i t: is the r elat i (n;:ll.i-,)
between management and tenant which crakes a project: a hone. A
recent article in the Journal of Property A3rag;er.;c:nt i.ldi.c;lt:�:; thli;
.0is pore than preventative maintenance merit?res emi)loycd, but.
the quali t:y of management's response to tenants' in-n-ter.ance nes cis;
arld the attitude of -the manager and staff of the deve)_o-,nre;lt
';ri,icil fIoster a Supportive environment,
I rc.co,-nize ��.hat the
Trl :.naC.ement of any real estate is a business, yet: the
sense of responsibility -toward his apartment, respect
residents, and promptness of rental payment are a func-tion of the
r�narement's attitude, I hope that Whichever proposal i - ., -ti�-cln_v
<1elected, fila t the n?a;la cement �ril.1 not deal in a paternal_i.;:i:i c
with the residents, but rather that it respects the tenants
JK _
(d) Services
The fourth factor that I looked at in eval.uatinr these
proposals wr is -the services proposed -to be located in or as:_ ociatod
%J,th each development, or "the potentiality :for the nrovi.sion of
services. liorr much Space is allocated for service functions and
r:lha."l. Id-nds of services will or could be available? Where are
the spaces located within the structure? Are they centralized
as i.n t}le -t.yDical downtown/residential relationship, or are they
ilenentral.izcri, similar "to a ne p;hborhood concept of urban life?
'..hat.trn-)act noes -this allocation and location of services have on
tho qualit_ of life 1•r.itliin each proposal? ', ho i%,ill have ultirnate
rest on:-ibility .for the _furnishi-ngfs, staffin- .^.nd coordi-nation of
hhr e �.c ti, ri-tries'? !:71a i planninf (d i.rect contnct cri.l:h senior
no Ci ,-Jtac t) lhaS One into pros l.dii Or
i.Ce3 rrhi_c}l 1-,(,. t t:heneeds orf the handicapped .and : reni.or citizen?
01 determined. what -the needs of these people were in the f ii:-st
Place - n%rchi tects, enginc,ers or prospective residents -1_111emselves?
The City Council_ Is very aware, I knob., of the importance of
hrvi n- clients speak fo.r thowselves rather than havin,; the decision -
r -slicer. n s::,urs n ':o ki;ow what tho e needs are,
(e) Attention to plannin,r for senior citizens and the handicarped
The la -,-t f .ctor rhi.ch I considered to be important -in this,
evaluation is related to the previous factor ,just discussed.
?l. attention h -s been . iven thus -far to pllnnihhF for the See-cial
ne,3C: Of the handl.c2?lhled nlhd our senior cit=z�cns? _I have been
esi-ccially 1i pi-cssed ,kd th one developer's trea.l:ment. of 'tills factor
bcc�,.u-e it was something offered which was not required nor %,,-U l it
be reouired in later steps of evaluation by HUD or by the .LEA.
Plarnin in the residential setting based on user -need studies is
a ccnrli_nr thin-. It's been discussed in a theoretical context
fpr ac, a t: n decade, but ho.s sel.domly been applied. A--ai-=-Inc' thnt
al.til
n-i.nkles can be ironed out, here i_s an opportunity for "the
C0,11 ci.l not only "to do something `to remedy the phy:-;ica.l,
re.-i.dential environment and foster a hi lh quality of life for
7_crI income c101U(T_ citizen= of Iowa City, but also -to place Ioloa Cite
in :he ran}ts of pro ;ressive, •'lction-oriented, and foin-Ja'd-l.00kin-
'_'his concludes my sv�---,est ions f:-�r which criteria to utilize
in ._: lluatillr t -he housing proposals Before Aou. My final concern
is ':rich the barj-ainin,7 t}iat Ij feel Should be conc'ucted, with the
ci.l:V Pt:orn(,Y,s Colina;,I, T�ric'r to forwardlnfr the tontative select;loll
to iiJD. I tins inlable, -to convince a major-ity of the Hollsin�
Conml.Ssi on lnt`iiil,erS of this Ur= ency of this poin-t, blit 11921l.eve that
if illi Col7mir;;ion members Thad read t=hrough al.l -the m:lt. ri-al sub-
1^itted b.,r t1ho developers, they might be more wil.lino_ to join
mr' i.n this ur'F S"t1011, Once tale LH l slg-nS anything, i_ts levera�_'-e
-is C -l-c .ely 5• onkened. It. is clear, I hope, t=hat all tiroposal.S
.re
71n F�tisfa(-,--tr or as i:>, but that with some alterations, l:e -:ould
all '.)e -ble to rest easier knowing that we have c=one file best
lve c:?ulrl,
t'lla,.k ou for consi_derinf this letter.
'.lderl.y Hoiising Project
Because of a sudden illness in my family, I was unable to attowd the
isi:;S Commission's 5aturday work session -,..,here Sections A throno-hlb o_'
e LEA checklist were voted upon. I would, t'nerefore, like to enu1,16 S e
those items where my vote would have differed from the mn jority:
Old Capital Associates
2.c. Recommend inferior. Unit plans for the handicapped were
not shown.
2..d. Recommend adequate
3.b. Recommend NO
Knutson Construction
2.d. Rcco,Timend superior. The Knu-son Company has spent a great
deal of time considering architectural xrangements as
they effect the mobility of the tenants, as well as, anile
of sunlight, exterior appearance, vier from windows, and
the tenants psychological environment.
J-dstates
2.c. i4ecom:rend inferior. Unit plans for the Inandicaaned
not shown.
Anon reviow, of the scores received by each sponsor from the L:HA check-
list,Midst.-;tes' were lower than eith :r Old Capital cr Knutson's ;•:hich ;sere
re]attvely '.he same except that rents in the Knutson project are br-low the
-naxi.ni-.im figure published in the Invitation for Proposnls. Section F; covered
c?ur:in� the Sunday work session (for which I was present) was rn a'_'-.e-Iot to
rurt.i,er distir.l-uish the three proposals. I am somewhat disanrointed ::nd
frustrated at the fact that the Commission was not able to est.ablish critoria
for c ,;Tulation which inight be more useful to the Council in meki.n; t?'ei.r
d,=c In i on.
In the final recommendation I voted for the Knutson Co:aoany ;;reject.
While I was very impressed with the design of the project and the effort
out forth by Knutson architects I frankly feel that all three projects fall
short of tho Con;.7lission's ex .:ctations prior to the Invitation for Proposnls.
1 •;m oarticulnrly disappointed that the sponsors of the Knutson project ;:ere
nit : hle to extricate t"e:tselves from apparent political comrlicat _c -'s 1:1 ; r'0r
to provide :pore than 64 units. This, however, is a personal preference. i
voted for tine Knutson project precisely because a sizeable number of elderly
neopie asked ne to vote for it and the following is an explanation of tliFlir
reasoning.
The elderly- w! -o contacted me, although reluctant to speak in large
have been followin:E U planning and review process sinco its bei-.innin�s.
The have e�-nressed a ,reference for the Knutson project because;
1) the lc,cat.ian is preferable to Old Capitals. They prefer to betan-
town, ho,. -ever find even Piidstates location and proposal preferable to
that offered by Old Capital Associates;
2) all. unitsin the Knutson plan are accessible to handicapped and/or
tc.:eporarily disabled people;
3) 11a11w.zys are not long nor "institutionallf
4) more units contain showers than the others ;•:hich is vitally important
tho oldor the tenant becomes and consequently the less mobile he bec(mes;
5) there are several extra rooms tahich can be usod for other a.cti..=ities,
_.^., library, greenhouse;
5) the rooms are much larger than any of the other plans;
7) extra parking for handicapped is provided;
S) they consider it.a plus to have a building c•rith just ctder-].y people
in it even if all the elderly are on subsidy;
?) window boxf`s are favorable and air condi.ti ming is not an i. sue.
in addition, although there is some feelingthat Project Graven does not
want Chauncey S;•:an Plaza destroyed, the elderly. persons .rho contacted me did
not. consider this a valid d.eterant to the project for two reasons; i) to their
kno:•rled;e Froject. Green has not issued a motion or recommendation to that
Effect and 20 the 1-andscave plans for the Knutson project seem to ti!c,M to
en:
St -.cement by: Fredine Branson, Chairperson
Io.,m. City Housing; Commission
On behr?.lf of the Housing Commission, I would li..e to
th n'_l- �.11 three of the developers for their title r.nd ex�menne
involved in the orepa.ration of proposals -to construct ^rid
the 62 subsidized units for the elderly mad irn.nd:i_c".npcd.
Ey vote of 5 to 2 the Housing Commission h,, -.s endorsed the
-»,o_")os^l of Old Capitol.
I nerson^lly supported Old Capitol's nro•)osal nr=i_mr.ri.ly
bcCn.ttr;e it :-rent beyond the 62 units r.nd pr.•o'io: ecI to build
^.n a('.dition^.l 38 non -subsidized unite to b^ rented -A. the
-P.ir ri:-.r'•_et price to the elderly and hn.ndicam)cd. Also, I
^.m comm tied to long-term plamaing for, down -lo\•. -n Iov::-. Cite
-.nd �- ou1d not litre to see the previous ,ilnns for clef e1o;�i 1
the i'_rec-bloc': novcrnmcnt^1 --)lnzn. reversed.
U- CIVIC CENTER. 410 E. WASHINGTON ST.
`!����� `'// `�/�(�� • /!�'C� IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240
319-354.1800
December 16, 1974
The Honorable Mayor
and City Council Members
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Council Members:
The Design Review Committee endorsed the Old Capitol
Plan by a vote of 7-0 at a meeting on December 16, 1974.
We do this because we wish to keep the Chauncey Swan
Plaza as an open space as related to the historic plan
of Iowa City designating this area as Farmers Market.
We will qualify our 7-0 vote with the following state-
ments:
The building to be built should fit the Iowa City
area with suitable and varied materials with a richness
Of color and texture. The scale and color should be
related to St. Patricks Church and the new Post Office
which are red and dark brick, respectively. There should
be an aesthetic approach to the outdoor space to fit
into the neighborhood with greenery and planting.
scale and design of the building should be compaThe
tible
with St. Patricks Church and the U. SPost
ing which are adjacent to this proje. Office Build -
should be built to conserve energy which will be more
scarce in the future.
We also wish to work with the Old Capitol builders
as to the interior design. Specifically the size of
each apartment, as we would like to see the apartments
larger even if this means fewer of them. In relation to
the community rooms, we think these should be designated
as to their size and use.
Very truly yours,
7 :�4fl -7 AiiZ
Tom Wegman �/
Chairman
TW/nh
Branson
Bosserman
Old
Capitol
Associates
Claypool
Old Capitol
Associates
Fountain
Knutson
Old
Construction
Capitol
Associates
Retish
Sheets
Old
Capitol
Associates
White
Knutson Construction
Old
Capitol
Associates
It was agreed to call this a qualified vote of 5-2 since
no one in the majority was completely satisfied with any
one proposal.
STAFF SUMMARY
in an effort to summarize the many items that were considered and
evaluated for each; proposal and to facilitate reaching a decision
the following major items are discussed.
A. Site. The location of the Midstates Project is such as not
to meet the requirements in the invitation. Both Knutson and
Old Capitol satisfy this requirement from a distance point of view.
From an accessibility point of view both sites have major barriers
separating them from the downtown area. Old Capitol has Burlington
Street, Knutson has. Gilbert Street and the hill mass. Old Capitol's
building is removed from Burlington Street by approximately 130 feet
with a earth berm and planting screen. Knutson's is bounded on
the West by Gilbert and on the North by Washington with no
possibility of screening to reduce traffic noise. The staff rates
the sites in the following order:
First - Old Capitol Associates
Second - Knutson Construction
Third - Midstates Development
B. Building on the site. The building proposed by Midstates
does not meet the invitation for proposals -- that is it is
Type V construction versus type I. IIorrevcr, it is appealing in
that it is not stacked housing. Old capitol's building is seven
stories in height and will to some extent stand out in the area.
It is just across the alley from Et. Patricks Church and across
the street from the new Federal Building which will reduce this
factor. The Knutson building is nine stories in height and will
stand out. Surrounding buildings are considerable lower and it
is believed the`.sheer height of this building will cause it to
stand out and perhaps not be appealing from this viewpoint.
The staff rates the building/site combination in this order.
First - old Capitol Associates
Second - Knutson Construction
Third - Midstates Development
C. Habitability and amenities. There is little doubt that the
Knutson proposal contains more space within the units and much
consideration was given to the design from the ,-menities stand-
point. However, space is not the only factor f -c consideration.
The view from ones window, the air temperature, and physical
layout must also be considered. The amenities to be provided
are important, however, it should be remembered that this
-2 -
building is to be considered as home for these occupants and
not an institution for the infirm. Visits from the nurse,
:.social worker, or social advisor/counselor can be accomplished
in the persons home without the need to visit a central area.
Sound and surrounding activity are important. With these
thoughts in mind the staff rates the proposals as follows.
First - Old Capitol Associates
Second - Knutson Construction
Third - Midstates Development
D. Viability of Program, the proposals chance of approval by
HUD and eventual construction. The Midstates proposal is an
excellent proposal in many respects. However, unless major
waivers are granted by the local housing Authority it is felt
that HUD would state the proposal was not rest-)onsive to the
invitation, i.e., Type V construction versus Type I and its
failure to be in close proximity to normal shopping and social
recreational activities. Further there are some financial concerns
that can only be resolved by HUD. It appears that the small
amount of capitol to be invested by the developer may not support
the loan he is requesting.
Knutson's proposal does contain more than the required space.
However, caution is expressed here that the housing Authority is
attempting to provide too much space. This has two prongs -
first the housing dollar is to be for housing and IIUD could
conceivably reject the proposal for this reason. The second
prong is a feeling that through subsidy these units will be
providing more than a medium income person could obtain without
subsidy. The amount of investment by the developer is small
compared to the size of loan. If interum financing is obtained
with a permanent plan to be arranged later the financial structure
may change. And finally the cost of construction appears to be
low to the point of concern. The letter received from Knutson
after the verbal presentation indicates that if selected this
entire area of total expense will be reviewed and the necessary
adjustments made. The site will require rezoning which could
cause problems. If rezoning fails then the proposal fails
and time may prohibit selecting another developer.
The Old Capitol proposal while providing only the minimum unit
space does have a more realistic approach to the financing of
the project. The project appears to offer all that is required of
public assisted housing. The staff recommends the proposals be
rated as follows.
I
m
>
M
T�
i
o
E5
O
tk .
D
�1
v
Z
-2 -
building is to be considered as home for these occupants and
not an institution for the infirm. Visits from the nurse,
social worker, or social advisor/counselor can be accomplished
in the persons home without the need to visit- a central area.
sound and surrounding activity are important. with these
thoughts in mind the staff rates the proposals as follows.
First - Old Capitol Associates
Second Knutson Construction
Third - Midstates Development
D. Viability of Program, the proposals chance of approval by
HUD and eventual construction. The Midstates proposal is an
excellent proposal in many respects. However, unless major
waivers are granted by ,the local Housing Authority it is felt
that HUD would state the proposal was not responsive to the
invitation, i.e., Type V construction versus Type I and its
failure to be in close proximity to normal shopping and social
recreational activities. Further there are some financial concerns
that can only be resolved by HUD. It appears that the small
amount of capitol to be invested by the developer may not support
the loan he is requesting.
Knutson's proposal does contain more than the required space.
However, caution is expressed here that the Housing Authority is
attempting to provide too much space. This has two prongs -
first the housing dollar is to be for housing and HUD could
conceivably reject the proposal for this reason. The second
prong is a feeling that through subsidy these units will be
providing more than a medium income person could obtain without
subsidy. The amount of investment by the developer is small
compared to the size of loan. If interum financing is obtained
with a permanent plan to be arranged later the financial structure
may change. And finally the cost of construction appears to be
low to the point of concern. The letter received from Knutson
after the verbal presentation indicates that if selected this
entire area of total expense will be reviewed and the necessary
adjustments made. The site will require rezoning which could
cause problems. If rezoning fails then the proposal fails
and time may prohibit selecting another developer.
The Old Capitol proposal while providing only the minimum unit
space does have a more realistic approach to the financing of
the project. The project appears to offer all that is required of
public assisted housing. The staff recommends the proposals be
rated as follows.
First - Old Capitol Associates
Second - Knutson Construction
Third- Midstates Development
The overall recommendation from the staff is that Old Capitol
Associates be tentatively selected at this time.
SECTION A EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
1. SITE.
a. Recommend YES.
b. Recommend YES.
C. Recommend Inferior. This recommendation is made with much
reluctance however a reasonable and rational analysis supports
the recommendation.
(1) It is inferior to another -site proposed.
(2) The proposal to place this building on this site is
contrary to an existing planned use of the site, i.e.,
this site is a portion of a plan for the development of a
civic, governmental complex composed of three blocks.
(3) The site is currently not zoned properly and a zoning
change would be required. The proposal does acknowledge
this requirement. It is believed that the rezoning would
be controversial to say the least. Should it fail to be
rezoned the city is running the risk of losing the federal
support for 62 units of elderly housing. The approval of
this allocation from HUD specifies that the authority must
enter.into an agreement to enter into a housing assistance
payment contract with the developer within five months,
that is February -.25, 1975. If zoning fails the authority
-may not have time to select another developer.
(4) The slope of the ground mass between the site and the
available shopping is such to discourage walking and may
prohibit navigability with a wheelchair or walker.
(5) The traffic on Gilbert and Washington would cause
noise problems. The building would only have the normal
set back from these streets with little or no possibility
of screening.
(6) The location just across
police stations would subject
caused by the sirens of fire,
vehicles.
the street from fire and
tenants to numerous disturbances
police, and emergency rescue
-2-
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION.
a. Recommend NO.
(1) Paragraph 3f states all community/recreational area and
administrative space shall be air conditioned and carpeted
except for kitchen, toilet and maintenance area. The
proposal provides carpeting for apartments, hallways and
clinical suite only.
(2) Paragraph q of the invitation for proposals requires
submission of certain documents if the project is to be
financed with HUD/FHA Insured Mortgage. The proposal
response indicated this item is not applicable at this
time yet the FHA form 2013 application - Project Mortgage
Insurance was completed and submitted. Entries on this form
will be dealt with later in this addendum.
(3) Paragraph 3x requires air conditioning in all units
to be assisted. Air conditioning in the units is not
provided. Through the wall sleeves for future installation of
1 or 1-� ton individual units is proposed. No indication at
whose.expense. If this item was provided as in the invitation
it would affect cost and also operating costs. This is
considered a major deviation from the invitation for proposals
and acceptance of any changes at this time would be considered
a change in the overall proposal.
(4) Paragraph 6 1 requires "The gross rents required by unit
size with the portion of such rents attributable to each
utility." The portion attributable to each utility was
provided late. The Form 2013 does list an operating cost
figure which appears extremely low considering the
structure. If the electricity was added to this cost for
the air conditioning it would certainly increase operating
costs and in turn have some effect on rent requirements.
(5) Paragraph 6b of _the invitation requires submission of
documents which show site control. The proposal shows the
First Christian Church has an option to purchase the
land and -has assigned the right to submit a proposal to
Knutson Construction. If this proposal is selected
additional documentation may be required prior to submission
to HUD.
(6) Paragraph 6c - requires a neighborhood mar showing
location of the site and the racial composition of the
neighborhood. This proposal does not give the racial
composition of the neighborhood. While this is not big
problem in Iowa City another developer has met this
criteria. This could be inserted if this proposal was
tentatively selected without materially changing the proposal.
(7) Water pressure on the top floors could be a problem.
The proposal does not address how this will be handled.
This could materially effect cost of the structure.
b. Recommend adequate. Density of development appears quite high.
It equates to 72 units per acre. However, this
density is not unreasonable considering the projected
occupancy, parking spaces required and its proximity'to
the central business district.
Land use intensity appears to be acceptable.
C. Recommend adequate.
(1) The space provided in the units is without a doubt
more than the other proposal received. The cost of construction
is questionable, but at this point in time commendable.
This specific item could mean rejection by HUD and the
local populace as providing more space than is required
in public housing. A backlash effect may arise from
those persons in the income group not eligible to participate
in -the program but cannot afford a comparable offering
on the open market.
(2) The opening between apartments at a first glance
may appear excellent. However, it does effectively
degrade privacy, fire attenuation and sound transmission.
d. Recommend adequate.
e. Recommend adequate.
3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS.
a. Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation
for Proposals. While the asking rents are below the maximum
contained in the invitation serious questions are raised
concerning several items on the HUD Form 2013. These would
__
effect rent. A few specifics are: Administrative cost -
$8,400 - it is doubtful a manager could be hired for the
project at this fee. What about the other employees and
administrative costs? Operating costs - $19,090 - utility
costs will without a doubt exceed this amount. what about
other costs? Taxes - $20,800 - extremely low. In fact
a building of this nature should produce taxes nearly double
this figure.
b. Recommend YES. Reservations are outlined in the previous
item.
C. Recommend YES. However, when the air conditioning is added
it is only reasonable to assume the utility cost will go up.
4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER
a. Recommend YES. See previous experience statement. This
firm is the general contractor for Cedar River Towers, a 25
story, 156 unit apartment building. Information from one of
the owners indicates the construction has gone well to this
point. It is closed in and ready for interior finishing.
b. Recommend YES. See previous experience statement.
C. Recommend YES. See above.
d. Recommend YES. See above.
e. Recommend acceptable.
f. Recommend YES. There is no identity of interest between
Knutson and the LHA.
SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY
1. Recommend YES.
2. Recommend YES.
3. Recommend YES. The Knutson Construction Firm is a reliable and
established firm. It is in business and has been successful,
therefore the experience and qualifications can be assumed to be
present.
4. Recommend YES. Material submitted indicates that Knutson would
select a qualified agent with necessary capabilities to carry out
the management of this project.
5. Not applicable.
6. Recommend YES. No agent identified but it can be assumed there
would be no identity of interest with the LHA. -
SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
1. Recommend YES.
2. Recommend YES.
3. Recommend adequate.
SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION.OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS
AND BUSINESSES
PERSONSARESIDINGROWNED IN IN THE PROJECTT AL PART BY
AREA
1. Recommend NO. Knutson not in Iowa City.
2. Recommend NO. There are no indications from*Knutson that
local subcontractors or suppliers would be utilized. However,
the firm has been active iri this city - Post office Building
and University hospital as general contractor.
3. Recommend NO. Proposal does provide a positive affirmative action
program for Minneapolis projects, however, does not relate or
project anticipated goals for this project. It can be assumed that
this could be negotiated if this proposal was tentatively selected.
4. Recommend adequate.
SECTION E - OTHER
1. Recommend YES.
2. Not applicable.
3. Other factors having a bearing.
(1) The site is bounded on two sides by heavily traveled
streets. As urban renewalproceeds the traffic on both of these
streets can be expected to increase.
(2) The site is not considered as good as that contained in
another proposal.
(3) The application for Project_ Mortgage reveals some serious
shortcomings from a financial stability standpoint. Building
cost $958,339 plus land cost of $113,400=$1,071,739. This probably
will not justify a loan of $1,336,300. The cash equity from the
sponsor versus the amount to be mortgaged is not realistic and
tends to present a very questionable financial structure for
this project. It appears that Knutson is acquiring interim
financing outside HUD/FHA until permanent financing can be
arranged. If this is to be a HUD/FHA plan there is a risk
that the rental rates as determined by the HUD/FHA mortgage
insurance program will not be as high as the fair market
rent established for this area, and the financial structure
would change after construction has begun. This change
could only be increased unlessthereare sacrifices in
quality of construction. We need not take this risk.
(4) Final and/or eventual ownership is not clearly stated.
This may effect the financial picture. If it is to be a
nonprofit organization exempt from all or some taxation the
picture is then different. If this is the case then the
rents are not in line with the fair market rents established
for this area.
i
:W CHECKL
ONSTRUCT
BION 23: I
LS
INSTRUCTIONS: Check oil applicable boxes and provide all information requested, even if the proposal is
found unacceptable on the basis of any single item or factor.
NAME OF LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT NUMBER
Tnwa Ci tv I IA 22-2
LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Chauncey Swan Plaza
I. SITE (S).
2r 1974
TOTAL NO. OF UNITS IN PROJECT
64
TOTAL NUMBER TO BE ASSISTED
62
SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
a. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the special requirements (if any) contained in
the LHA's Invitation for Proposals and/or Developer's Packet.
YES
.� NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (F.spluin)
b. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements contained in paragraph 2-9 of
the Section 23 New Construction Handbook.
I_ YES
NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
c. Site desirability is:
L� SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE C] INFERIOR
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. (if the proposal, including the Preliminary Drawings and
Specifications, is not sufficient to verify compliance with design and construction quality requirements.
additional information which does not alter the scope of the proposal may be requested.)
a. The design and quality of construction are in accordance with LHA and HUD requirements specified in
the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
b. In relation to the other proposals received, the land use planning and treatment of the proposed site is:
�J SUPERIOR �.�] ADEQUATE [_� INFERIOR
c. In relation to the other proposals received, the building layout and unit plans are:
Q SUPERIOR - Q ADEQUATE u INFERIOR
d. In relation to the other proposals received, the architectural treatment of structures is:
Q SUPERIOR - [D ADEQUATE E] INFERIOR
■
3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS.
a. The per unit gross rents are:
EQUA
and materials is: '
Q: INFERIOR
Q Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals
MEquaI to such maximum gross rents
QAbove such maximum gross rents — proposal unacceptable
b. The proposed rents to owner are reasonable in relation to the quality, location, amenities and manage-
ment and maintenance services of the proposed project.
Q YES _
Q No (Explain)
c. The estimated utility allowances for tenant -purchased utilities are reasonable.
Q YES
Q NO (Explain)
4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER.
a. The developer, builder, and/or owner have acceptable experience in the development and/or construction
of housing, or in related fields.
Q YES (Explain)
ED No (Explain)
b. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in developing housing for lower) income persons.
YES (Explain)
NO
c. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the type of construction proposed.
YES (Explain)
O NO
d. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the development and/or construction of projects
at' a scale comparable to that of the proposed project.
0 YES (Explain)
No (Explain)
e. The ability of the developer, builder, and/or owner as demonstrated by past performance is:
Q VERY 0000
a ACCEPTABLE
f. There is no identity of interest between the owner and the LHA.
Q YES
Q NO - PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
MUD -52500A (3-74)
—2—
r.:
Q NOT ACCEPTABLE
1. The proposal conforms to the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New
Construction Handbook in regard to owner responsibilities for management, maintenance, taxes, insurance,
and utilities.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. The management submission contained in the proposal meets all requirements of Appendix V of the Section 23
New Construction Handbook.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
3. The owner has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance
activities.
Q YES (Explain)
Q No (Explain)
4. If the owner proposes to contract with a management agent to carry out management and maintenance responsi-
bilities, such agent has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out such responsibilities.
Q YES (Explain)
Q No (Explain)
S. If the owner proposes to contract with the LHA for management, maintenance, or operation of the project,
complete the following.
a: The owner has satisfactorily demonstrated that no other competent management agent is available.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
b. The proposed contract -to be entered into with the LHA is acceptable.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
6. There is no identity of interest between the LHA and the management agent.
C] YES
Q NO — MANAGEMENT SUBMISSION IS UNACCEPTABLE
SECTION C — COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
1. The owner has submitted an Affirmative Farr Housing Marketing Plan.
YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. The required Title VI Assurance and any required Executive Order 11246 certifications have been submitted.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
3. The potential of the proposal for achieving equal opportunity objectives, relative to all other proposals
submitted, is:
Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE Q INFERIOR
HUD -52500A (3-74)
e
—3—
1. The developer's, builder's and/or owner's firm is located in,.or owned in substantial part by persons residing
in, the project area.
YES
Q NO
2. An affirmative action plan for utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons
residing in the project area has been submitted.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
3. The proposal includes information with regard to the number of trainee and employee positions to be filled
by lower income project area residents as required by regulations issued pursuant to Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968.
Q YES
No (Explain)
4: In relation to other development proposals received, the developer's, builder's, and/or owner's plan has the
following potential for effectuating the purposes of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968:
Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE = INFERIOR
SECTION E — OTHER
1. The proposal meets all other requirements of the Invitation for Proposals, Developer's Packet, and the Sec-
tion 23 New Construction Handbook.
Q YES - -
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. (Complete if proposed project will involve displacement of site occupants.)
a. The estimate of relocation costs submitted with the proposal is accepted.
O YES
No (Explain)
b. If the answer to a above is "No," the amount of relocation costs as calculated by the LHA
is S
c. The proposal indicate that the developer, builder, and/or owner is/are fully cognizant of HUD relocation
requirements under the, Uniform Relocation Assistance and* Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
and will meet those requirements.
O YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
d. Full funding of all relocation costs involved will be provided:
(1) By the developer, builder, and/or owner.
Q YES -
r-1 NO
(2) By other commitments satisfactory to HUD:
(� YES (Specify)
0 No (Specify)
HUD-52SOOA (3-74)
—4—
(Date)
HUD -52500A (3-74)
—5—
(Signature of LHA Official)
(Title)
an
- n u r Sal.`
on- evalwtion of the
(Date)
HUD -52500A (3-74)
—5—
(Signature of LHA Official)
(Title)
an
HOUSING COMMISSION
ADDENDUM HUD 52500A
LHA REVIEW CHECKLIST
KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION
SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
1. SITE.
a. Recommend YES. 4-0.
b. Recommend YES. 4-0. The site in this proposal is not totally
free from adverse environmental conditions such as excessive noise
(fire and police station across street) or vehicular traffic.
Simulated traffic counts with Dubuque and Madison street closings
for Gilbert Street between Burlington Street and Iowa Avenue
range from 17,300 in the Recreation Center block, 16,200 in the
block of the proposed building and 14,000 in the block just north
of -the site.
C. Recommend adequate. 4•-0.
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION.
a. Recommend YES. 4-0. This proposal does not provide air
conditioning in the dwelling units. However, by letter the developer
has indicated this could be provided and a review of the rental
structure would be necessary.
b. Recommend adequate. 4-0.
C. Recommend superior. 4-0. The space provided both within
the dwelling units and outside the units but within the building
is so arranged as to facilitate and encourage interaction
between tenants and comfortable and convenient access and mobility.
d. Recommend adequate 3. Recommend superior 1.
e. Recommend adequate. 5-0.
3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS.
a. Recommend Below the maximum gross rents published in the
Invitation for Proposals. 5-0. While this proposal does indicate
a lower rent, air conditioning was not included within the units.
The developer has indicated this could be added and the rental
structure reviewed.
b. Recommend YES. 5-0: In evaluating this item for this proposal
the planning for amenities and space provided is more than the other
proposals. This could- be viewed as a balance for the lack of
air conditioning.
C. No tenant provided utilities.
4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER.
a. Recommend YES. 5-0. The previous participation certificate
indicates this firm has acceptable experience in the development
and construction of buildings of this magnitude.
b. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above comments.
C. Recommend YES. 5-0. See above.
d.
Recommend
YES. 5-0.
See above.
e.
Recommend
acceptable.
5-0.
f. Recommend YES. 5-0.
SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY
1. Recommend YES. 6-0.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0. There is a factual error in the plan.
Tenants are certified and re -certified as eligible to participate
by the Housing Authority not the owner.
3. Recommend YES. 6-0. The information submitted with the proposal
contained in exhibit Q, Behavorial. Program and Planning Quide indicate
this firm has reviewed and considered the elderly and handicapped not
only in designing the building but in the management of the project.
4. No agent identified.
5. Not applicable.
6. Recommend YES. 6-0.
SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
1. Recommend YES. 6-0.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0.
3. Recommend adequate. 6-0.
L
SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS
AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN OR OWNED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY
PERSONS RESIDING IN THE PROJECT AREA
1. Recommend NO. 6-0.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0.
3. Recommend NO. 6-0. This proposal does provide a breakout of
employees in the home office area, but not for this project. It
appears that it is much too early in the processing schedule to ask
for this type detail.
4. Recommend adequate. 6-0.
SECTION E - OTHER
1. Recommend YES.
a. Does not meet parking requirement .for the zone to date, but
developer has indicated that an adjustment will be sought.
2. Not applicable.
3. Other factors having a bearing upon the evaluation.
a. This proposal listed an "in sink garbage disposal unit."
It is unclear if this is provided in each unit or just in the
community kitchen.
b. This proposal included two laundry areas.
C. Has provided several lounge areas with window views.
d. Proposal contains showers in each unit with a tub room
available on every other floor. The specifications on the showers
list 48" x 32 Floor plan indicates showers are 5' square.
Showers for handicapped must be minimum of 48" x 48".
e. Garbage shutes available on each floor to a central compactor.
f. No specific references were provided pertaining to special
attention for sound attenuation other than the carpeting on the
floor and acoustical tile.
g. This proposal indicates a window height from the floor of
28 inches.
h. Did not include air conditioning but has indicated their
willingness to do so with a rent review to follow. If individual
units are installed through the wall in each room they will protrude
either on the inside or the outside.
i. Interior decorating scheme was not detailed. It is hoped
there will be some latitude for individual choice within the
apartment.
j. This proposal provides 36" doors in all apartments and an
additional 2' space beside the door to facilitate opening and
closing.
k. A designated and planned arts and crafts center is provided.
HUt`-52500A
(3-7a)
s
INSTRUCTIONS: Check all applicable boxes and provide all information requested, even if the proposal is
found unacceptable on the basis of any single item or factor.
NAME OF LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECT NUMBER
Iowa City IA 22-2
FIRM NAME
Midstates Develo
LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
West Benton Street
1. SITE(S)•
t, Inc.
December 2, 1974
TOTAL NO. OF UNITS IN PROJECT
62
UI AL NUMBER TO BE ASSISTED
62
SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
a. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the special requirements (if any) contained in
the LHA's Invitation for Proposals and/or Developer's Packet.
YES
NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
b. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements contained in paragraph 2--9 of
the Section 23 New Construction Handbook.
YES
. NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
C. Site desirability is:
[-I SUPERIOR
ADEQUATE
I INFERIOR
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. (/f the proposal, including the Preliminary Drawings and
.Specifications, is not sufficient to verify compliance with design and construction quality requirements,
additional information which does not alter the scope of the proposal may be requested.)
a. The design and quality of construction are in accordance with LHA and HUD requirements specified in
the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
b. In relation to the other proposals received, the land use planning and treatment of the proposed site is:
O SUPERIOR 0 ADEQUATE L-1 INFERIOR
c. In relation to the other proposals received, the building layout and unit plans are:
Q SUPERIOR - Q ADEQUATE
LJ INFERIOR
d. In relation to the other proposals received, the architectural treatment of structures is:
EJ SUPERIOR O ADEQUATE F-1 INFERIOR
Q Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals
QEqual to such maximum gross rents
QAbove such maximum gross rents — proposal unacceptable
b. The proposed rents to owner are reasonable in relation to the quality, location, amenities and manage-
ment and maintenance services of the proposed project.
Q YES
Q NO (Explain)
c. The estimated utility allowances for tenant -purchased utilities are reasonable.
Q YES
0 No (Explain)
9. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/Olt OWNER.
a. The developer, builder, and/or owner have acceptable experience in the development and/or construction
of housing, or in related fields.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO (Explain)
b. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in developing housing for low(er) income persons.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO
c. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the type of construction proposed.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO
d. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the development and/or construction of projects
at'a scale comparable to that of the proposed project.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO (Explain)
e. The ability of the developer, builder, and/or owner.as demonstrated by past performance is:
Q VERY 0000
Q ACCEPTABLE
f. There is no identity of interest between the owner and the LHA.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
HUD -52500A (3-74)
—2—
Q NOT ACCEPTABLE
(If the owner's management
below, the LHA may require the owner ?o submit additional information.) - _ - �..r. I IoR',
1.
The proposal conforms to the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New
Construction Handbook in regard to owner responsibilities for management, maintenance, taxes, insurance,
and utilities.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. The management submission contained in the proposal meets all requirements of Appendix V of the Section 23
New Construction Handbook.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
3. The owner has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance
activities.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO (Explain)
4. If the owner proposes to contract with a management agent to carry out management and maintenance responsi-
bilities, such agent has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out such responsibilities.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO (Explain)
S. If the owner proposes to contract with the LHA for management, maintenance, or operation of the project,
complete the following.
a: The owner has satisfactorily demonstrated that no.other competent management agent is available.
Q YES
Q NO (Explain)
b. The proposed contract to be entered into with the LHA is acceptable.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
6. There is no identity of interest between the LHA and the management agent.
Q YES -.
Q NO — MANAGEMENT SUBMISSION IS UNACCEPTABLE
SECTION C — COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
I. The owner has submitted an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan.
YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. The required Title VI Assurance and any required Executive Order 11246 certifications have been submitted.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
3. The potential of the proposal for achieving equal opportunity objectives, relative to all other proposals
submitted, is:
Q SUPERIOR
HUD -52500A (3-74)
Q ADEQUATE
—3—
Q INFERIOR
i r':,
SECTION D LOYMENT W. TILIZATION, ,OF ,INCOME RESIDENTS
AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN. OR OWNED`IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY
:•: PERSONS RESIDING:INTHE'PROJECT AREA., _.
1. The developer's, builder's and/or owner's firm is located in, or owned in substantial part by persons residing
in, the project area.
Q YES
Q NO
2. An affirmative action plan for utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons
residing in the project area has been submitted.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
3. The proposal includes information with regard to the number of trainee and employee positions to be filled
by lower income project area residents as required by regulations issued pursuant to Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968. -
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
4: In relation to other development proposals received, the developer's, builder's, and/or owner's plan has the
following potential for effectuating the purposes of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968:
Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE Q INFERIOR
SECTION E — OTHER
1. The proposal meets all other requirements of the Invitation for Proposals, Developer's Packet, and the Sec-
tion 23 New Construction Handbook.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. (Complete if proposed project will involve displacement of site occupants.)
a. The estimate of relocation costs submitted with the proposal is accepted.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
b. If the answer to a above is "No," the amount of relocation costs as calculated by the LHA
is S
c. The proposal indicate_ that the developer, builder, and/or owner is/are fully cognizant of HUD relocation
requirements under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and'Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
and will meet those requirements.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
d. Full funding of all relocation costs involved will be provided:
(1) By the developer, builder, and/or owner.'
Q YES
Q NO
(2) By other commitments satisfactory to HUD:
Q YES (Specify)
Q No (Specify)
HUD -52500A (3-71) —4—
(Date)
(Signature of LHA Official)
(Title)
HUD -52500A (3-74)
— 5 —
HOUSING
ADDENDUM IiUD 525OOA
LIIA REVIEW CIIECKLIST
MIDSTATES DEVELOPMENT
1. SITE.
SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
a. Recommend NO. 4-0. This site does not meet the requirements
specified in the invitation for proposals. Paragraph 3i states
"Other locations may be considered provided they are within easy
walking distance (3 blocks) of social, recreational, commercial,
municipal facilities and services, health facilities, etc."
b. Recommend YES. 4-0. This site is in alignment with airport
traffic which may cause some minor noise factors. It is highly
dependent on private auto or mass transit which does stop immediately
in front of the site.
C. Recommend inferior 3. Adequate 1. All three sites could be
considered adequate, however, each has its drawbacks as indicated
in the above items. The issue of site location is really a value
judgement as no systematic user -need study has been conducted to
determine the preferences of the potential residents. In relationship
to the other sites and the requirements spelled out in'the invitation
this site is inferior.
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION.
a. Recommend NO. 4-0. The design of th
proposal is appealing in that the two sto
more acceptable than a highrise building.
provided will meet the required building
area and the fire saftey requirements for
it does not meet the type I construction
b. Recommend adequate. 4-0.
e building in this
ry structure may be
The type V construction
code requirements for this
this fire zone. However,
specified in the invitation.
C. Recommend adequate. 4-0. The minimum 10% of the living units
to be designated for the handicapped is not shown. These units
must have a 4' x 4' shower or a tub that is accessible on one side
for the entire length of the tub. The. kitchens do not provide
turn around space for those in wheelchairs.
d. Recommend adequate. 4-0.
e. Recommend inferior 4. Adequate 1. For this rating only materials
were'considered.- The quality•of'construction could not be evaluated.
3.
4.
1.
PER UNIT GROSS RENTS.
a. Recommend Equal to such maximum gross rents. 5-0.
b. Recommend NO. 5-0. Land costs are leas, less expensive material
costs, and a two story building should be less costly to construct.
The quality of the building and amenities provided and the location
would not appear to support this high a rental scale.
C. No tenant purchased utilities.
CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER.
a. Recommend YES. 5-0. This developer has acceptable experience
in the development and construction of housing. The projects
listed on the required HUD form which spells out previous participation
would indicate this developer has and would continue to perform
in a satisfactory manner.
b. Recommend YES. 5-0.
C. Recommend YES. 5-0.
d. Recommend YES. 5-0.
e. Recommend acceptable.
f. Recommend YES. 5-0.
See above comments.
See above.
See above.
5-0.
SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY
Recommend YES. 6-0.
2. Recommend NO. 6-0. While the proposal does contain a management
plan it does not contain the detail required by Appendix v of the
HUD Handbook. The developer, in his verbal presentation to the
Commission did indicate to our satisfaction that these requirements
would be met.
3. Recommend YES. 6-0. This firm has been in the residential construction
business as shown in the proposal. Sufficient evidence is available
to indicate the experience and qualifications are present to carry
out the management and maintenance functions.
4. No agents identified.
5. Not applicable.
6. Recommend YES. 6-0.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0.
3. Recommend adequate. 6-0.
SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOVER INCOME RESIDENTS
AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN OR OWNED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY
PERSONS RESIDING IN THE PROJECT AREA
1. Recommend NO. 6-0.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0.
3. Recommend YES. 6-0. While this proposal does not specify the
detail concerning number of trainees and employees it is believed the
firm could fulfill all requirements of this section. At this stage
of processing it appears to be an unrealistic evaluation.
4. Recommend adequate. 6-0.
SECTION E - OTHER
1. Recommend NO.
a. The entire length of the bathtubisnot accessible to the
bather.
b. Kitchen does not provide a 5' turning radius on required
10% of units.
C. Does not meet parking requirement for the zone to date, but
developer has indicated that an adjustment will be sought.
d. Proposal does not indicate that a 24 hour emergency call service
would be provided. The developer did indicate in his presentation
that it would be provided.
e. Did not include T.V. antenna as required, however, in the
verbal presentation the developer indicated this would be included.
2. Not applicable.
3. Other factors having a bearing upon the evaluation.
a. h horsepower garbage disposal units are listed in the outline
specifications. It is unclear if these are in community kitchen
only or are also included in the individual unit kitchens.
b. This proposal included two laundry areas.
C. The general floor plan indicates the lobby area has no
windows.
d. Provides for 62 tubs with hand showers.
e. Compactors not provided, however, in presentation the
developer indicated there would be facilities for a pick-up
arrangement on each floor.
f. No specific attention has been given to sound attenuation
other than the carpeting on the floor and acoustical tile.
g. Window heights from floor was not specified.
h. Includes air conditioning.
i. No details were provided concerning the interior decorating
scheme. It is hoped that there may be latitude for individual
choices within the apartments.
j. Door widths to bathrooms appear to be 30" and 32" as required.
k. A designated space has not been indicated for arts and
crafts although it could be included in the community room.
ADDENDUM TO HUD -52500A
1,11A REVIEW CHECKLIST
MIDSTATES DEVELOPMENT, INC.
1. SITE.
a. Recommend NO. Paragraph 3i of the invitation states
"....other locations may be considered
y provided they are
within easy walking distance (3 blocks) of social,
recreational commercial, municipal facilities and services,
health facilities, etc. as provided in the preferred area...".
This site does not provide this ready access. While a public
transportation capability is available to the site, the
nearest shopping is in excess of six blocks. The steep incline
on West Benton Street would probably discourage occupants
from walking in that direction which would be necessary to
reach shopping, therefore the occupants would be dependant
on public or private means of transportation.
b. Recommend YES.
C. Inferior. The site is remote from the type service and
shopping requirements normally utilized by the occupants
that will be served by this program.
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION.
a. Recommend NO. Paragraph 3b of the invitation specifies
Type I construction. Uniform Building Code (UBC) defines
"The structural elements in type I buildings shall be of
steel, iron, concrete or masonry." This proposal is type V
construction, UBC definition -"Type V building may be of
any materials allowed by this code. Type V, one-hour
buildings shall be of one-hour fire resistive construction
throughout". This proposal is not responsive to the invitation
even though the developer has indicated it will meet all the
requirements of the fire zone in which it is located. Because
it is type V construction it does not have the durability
of type I.
b. Recommend adequate. The site layout is well planned.
C. Recommend adequate., -The building layout and unit plans
are adequate in comparison to the other proposals received.
3
d. Recommend adequate.
e. Recommend inferior.
in the other proposals.
PER UNIT GROSS RENTS.
Type V in comparison to Type I
a. Equal to such maximum gross rents. Fair market rents
for an elevator type building established by HUD is $266
for a one bedroom unit and $338 for a two bedroom unit.
b. Recommend NO. These rents are not comparable to other
proposals received. Land cost is less, construction cost
should be considerably less therefore rents should be less.
In comparing to similar type construction in this city
built within the last year the rents requested in this proposal
are considered to be extremely high. Several buildings
similar in construction rent for $170-185 plus electricity
for a one bedroom and $225 for two bedroom. Another building
more sturdy in construction than this proposal , one bedroom
with 830 sq. ft. rents for $230 plus electricity, two
bedroom, one bath, 1116 sq. ft. $300 plus electricity. These
apartments would be considered plush compared to this proposal.
c. No tenant purchased utilities. Recommend YES.
4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER.
a. Recommend YES. The Midstated Development, Inc. has
experience in the development and construction of housing.
See previous participation certificate.
b. Recommend YES. The development at Charles City is for
low income elderly. It is a well planned and constructed
complex.
C. Recommend YES. Same as above.
d. Recommend YES. Same as above.
e. Recommend acceptable.
f. Recommend YES.
-3 -
SECTION B -MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY
1. Recommend YES. Statement included in proposal.
2. Recommend NO. Proposal does not include items contained
in paragraph 2b, C appendix V, i.e., contact person responsible
for management and the list of projects previously owned and/or
managed. While the description of the management philosophy
is present and indicates what the management plan will be the
presentation does not handle.specifics as required by appendix V.
Example - eviction procedures;.what maintenance and services
will be provided. The 24 hour emergency call service which is
required by the invitation is not included. In view of the above
there is no reason to believe that this item could not be
negotiated to successful completion if this proposal was tentatively
selected.
3. Recommend YES. The established reputation of the firm by
past experience would indicate they do have the experience and
qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance.
4. Recommend YES. Developer/owner has
local manager would be hired and would
established by the firm.
5. Not applicable.
6. Not applicable.
indicated an on site
perform under quidelines
SECTION C -COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS•
1. Recommend YES. HUD form 935.2 included in proposal. Also
touched upon in the management submission.
2. Recommend YES. HUD form 41901 included.
3. Recommend adequate.
1. No.
2. Recommend YES. Stated intent to utilize local labor, materials
and subcontractors to the fullest potential.
3. Recommend NO. Statement is made that site employment
will conform with local, state and federal guidelines. The
proposal does indicate that the sponsors affirmative action program
is on file in the Omaha Area Office. Based on the fact that this
firm has developed and constructed public housing it is reasonable
to assume these plans are adequate. This could be obtained if
this proposal was selected.
4. Recommend adequate.
SECTION E - OTHER
1. Recommend NO.
a. Type V when I was designated.
b. Parking spaces not adequate for zone. Both owner and
developer have indicated additional spaces could be added.
This would have an effect on total cost and would probably
alter the cost.
C. Management plan marginal.
d. No landscape plans submitted, required by paragraph 6
of invitation.
e. No neighborhood map showing minority concentration.
Required by paragraph 6C. This could be negotiated or
added if this proposal was selected.
2. Not applicable.
3. Other factors
(1) Accessible by only one street.
(2) Availability of othersites more suitably located dictates
that this proposal not be tentatively selected.
(3) The proposal is not responsive in two major areas, i.e.,
type of construction and location.
(4) The request for a loan in principal amount of $1,150,000 vs.
total investment to be made does not appear realistic.
Example, $860,000 estimated building cost & $87,500 land
cost = $947,500 this would not support a loan as requested.
Example, estimated assessed value for taxes is $800,000 it
is believed this would not support a loan of this magnitude.
(5) This site would be subject to airport noises. while this
may be minimal the site is in the normal ta'.ce-off and landing
pattern for our small municipal airport.
INSTRUCTIONS: Check all applicable boxes and provide all information requested, even if the proposal is
found unacceptable on the basis of any single item or factor.
NAME OF LOCAL HOUSING AUTHORITY PROJECt NUMBER
Iowa City Housing Authority IA 22-2
Old Capitol Associates
LOCATION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Corner of Dubuque and Court Streets
1. SPPF.(S).
December 2, 1974
TOTAL NO. OF UNITS IN PROJECT
100
OTAL NUMBER TO BE ASSISTED
62
SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
a. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the special requirements (if any) contained in
the LHA's Invitation for Proposals and/or Developer's Packet.
I YES
NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
b. The site of the proposed project is in conformance with the requirements contained in paragraph 2--9 of
the Section 23 New Construction Handbook.
I I YES
I J NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
c. Site desirability is:
U SUPERIOR
0 ADEQUATE
U INFERIOR
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION. (If the proposal, including the Preliminary Drawings and
Specifications, is not sufficient to verify compliance with design and construction quality requirements.
additional information which does not alter the scope of the proposal may be requested.)
a. The design and quality of construction are in accordance with LHA and HUD requirements specified in
the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New Construction Handbook.
I-7 YES
NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
b. In relation to the other proposals received, the land use planning and treatment of the proposed site is:
EJ SUPERIOR
I--] ADEQUATE
C] INFERIOR
c. In relation to the other proposals received, the building layout and unit plans are:
Q SUPERIOR
u ADEQUATE
INFERIOR
d. In relation to the other proposals received, the architectural treatment of structures is:
0 SUPERIOR 0 ADEQUATE 0 INFERIOR
e. The per unit gross rents are:
Q Below the maximum gross rents published in the Invitation for Proposals
Q Equal to such maximum gross rents
Q Above such maximum gross rents — proposal unacceptable
b. The proposed rents to owner are reasonable in relation to the quality, location, amenities and manage-
ment and maintenance services of the proposed project.
Q YES
Q NO (Explain)
c. The estimated utility allowances for tenant -purchased utilities are reasonable.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER.
a. The developer, builder, and/or owner have acceptable experience in the development and/or construction
of housing, or in related fields.
Q YES (Explain)
Q No (Explain)
b. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in developing housing for low(er) income persons.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO
c. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the type of construction proposed.
Q YES (Explain)
Q NO
d. The developer, builder, and/or owner have experience in the development and/or construction of projects
at: a scale comparable to that of the proposed project.
Q YES (Explain)
Q No (Explain)
e. The ability of the developer, builder, and/or owner as demonstrated by past performance is:
Q VERY GOOD
Q ACCEPTABLE
f. There is no identity of interest between the owner and the LHA.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
MUD -52500A (3-74)
—2—
Q NOT ACCEPTABLE
1
® SECTION 11 = MANAGEMENT. CAP, ITY
(If the owner's management submission ns insufflclent:,to enable -the LHA to.odequately evaluate, any items_
below, the LHA may require the owner to submit -additional Inlormation.)
I. The proposal conforms to the Invitation for Proposals, the Developer's Packet, and the Section 23 New
Construction Handbook in regard to: owner responsibilities for management, maintenance, taxes, insurance,
and utilities.
Q YES
E:] NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. The management submission contained in the proposal meets all requirements of Appendix V of the Section 23
New Construction Handbook.
[] YES
(] NO (Explain)
3. The owner has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out project management and maintenance
activities.
I] YES (Explain)
0 NO (Explain)
4. If the owner proposes to contract with a management agent to carry out management and maintenance responsi-
bilities, such agent has the necessary experience and/or qualifications to carry out such responsibilities.
[] YES (Explain)
Q NO (ExpWn)
S. If the owner proposes to contract with the LHA for management, maintenance, or operation of the project,
complete the following.
a: The owner has satisfactorily demonstrated that no other competent management agent is available.
Q YES
E-1 NO (Explain)
b. The proposed contract to be entered into with.the LHA is acceptable.
Q YES
(] No (Explain)
6. There is no identity of interest between the LHA and the management agent.
YES -.
0 NO — MANAGEMENT SUBMISSION IS UNACCEPTABLE
SECTION C — COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
1. The owner has submitted an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan.
YES
[] NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. The required Title VI Assurance and any required Executive Order 11246 certifications have been submitted.
YES
No (Explain)
3. The potential of the proposal for achieving equal opportunity objectives, relative to all other proposals
submitted, is:
M SUPERIOR
HUD -52500A (3-74)
Q ADEQUATE
—3—
Cj INFERIOR
SECTION
AND BUSINI
AA.INCOME RESIDENTS
UBSTANTIAL PART BY
PERSONS RESIDING JN. .THE: PROJECT. AREA
1. The developer's, builder's and/or owner's firm is located in,.or owned in substantial part by persons residing
in, the project area.
Q YES
Q NO
2. An affirmative action plan for utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons
residing in the project area has been submitted.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
3. The proposal includes information with regard to the number of trainee and employee positions to be filled
by lower income project area residents as required by regulations issued pursuant to Section 3 of the
Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968.
Q YES
Q No (Explain)
4: In relation to other development proposals received, the developer's, builder's, and/or owner's plan has the
following potential foreffectuating the purposes of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of
1968:
Q SUPERIOR Q ADEQUATE Q INFERIOR
SECTION E - OTHER
1. The proposal meets all other requirements of the Invitation for Proposals, Developer's Packet, and the Sec-
tion 23 New Construction Handbook.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
2. (Complete if proposed project will involve displacement of site occupants.)
a. The estimate of relocation costs submitted with the proposal is accepted.
Q YES
Q NO (Explain)
b. If the answer to a above is "No," the amount of relocation costs as calculated by the LHA
is S
c. The proposal indicate- that the developer, builder, and/or owner is/are fully cognizant of HUD relocation
requirements under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and•Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
and will meet those requirements.
Q YES
Q NO — PROPOSAL UNACCEPTABLE (Explain)
d. Full funding of all relocation costs involved will be provided:
(1) By the developer, builder, and/or owner.
Q YES
�] NO
(2) By other commitments satisfactory to HUD:
Q Yes (Specify)
Q NO (SPeeijy)
HUD -52500A (3-71)
EM -M
0
(Dote)
HUD -52500A (3-74)
-5-
(Signature of LHA Official)
(Title)
i
ADDENDUM HUD 52500A
LHA REVIEW CHECKLIST
OLD CAPITOL ASSOCIATES
SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
1. SITE.
a. Recommend YES.
b. Recommend YES.
C. Recommend adequate.
(1) It is recognized that Burlington Street may be considered
a barrier between this site and the downtown area. However,
it should be considered that this area is now under
construction, the stop lights are on order and there is
a planned light on Burlington and Dubuque. There does
exist the possibility of an overpass but this too is a
barrier. Dubuque Street North of Burlington will be
closed, therefore it can be reasonably expected that the
traffic on Dubuque Street past the site will have little
traffic.
2. DESIGN AND QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION.
a. Recommend YES.
b. Recommend Adequate. The density of this development is
high. It will equate to 97 units per acre. This density may
be acceptable considering the projected occupancy, parking
spaces provided and its proximity to the central business
district. Land use intensity is acceptable.
C. Recommend adequate. The building layout is good for this
site with the surrounding buildings and activities. It is
believed the unit plans will provide the minimum acceptable
amount of floor space when using the furnishability technique
contained in the HUD manual. If this proposal is tentatively
selected consideration should be given to negotiating increased
floor space in the one bedroom units at no increase in rent.
This could probably be accomplished by reducing the number
of units on each floor. This would have an effect on the
rental income and would change the financial base.
d. Recommend adequate.
e. Recommend adequate:
-2-
3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS.
a. Recommend equal to such maximum gross rents.
b. Recommend YES.
C. Recommend YES.
4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER.
a. Recommend YES. While Old Capitol Associates is a new
organization, the architects, Hansen, Lind, Meyer, has
participated in other housing projects as the inspecting
architect for Keokuk's-7 story 200 unit project and have
designed private elderly housing, example, Oaknoll, Iowa
City. Link Inc. and affiliates have extensive experience
building and managing residential property. While this is
not shown in the proposal it could be added if this proposal
is tentatively selected.
b. Recommend YES. See above.
C.
Recommend
YES.
See
above.
d.
Recommend
YES.
See
above.
e. Recommend acceptable.
f. Recommend YES.
SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY
1. R ecommend YES.
2. Recommend YES.
3. Recommend YES. Old Capitol Associates is a new organization.
Members of the association have considerable knowledge and experience
in building, owning and managing real estate to include residential.
4. Recommend YES. While an agent is not identified at this time
the plan submitted indicates building management, maintenance
and supervision will be adequately provided.
5. Not applicable.
6. Recommend YES.
SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
1. Recommend YES.
2. Recommend YES.
3. Recommend adequate.
SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS
AND BUSINESSES LOCATED IN OR OWNED IN SUBSTANTIAL PART BY
PERSONS RESIDING IN THE PROJECT AREA
1. Recommend YES. It is important to consider that this proposal
is the only one received that will be locally owned in substantial
part by residents of this community.
2. Recommend YES.
3. Recommend NO. Proposal does contain an adequate affirmative
action plan. At this step of the processing, work force, etc.
cannot be provided. It can be assumed that this requirement can
be met if this proposal is tentatively selected.
4. Recommend adequate.
SECTION E - OTHER
1. Recommend YES.
2. Not applicable.
3. Other factors.
(1) This proposal provides for 100 units. 62 to be provided
rental assistance and 38 other units. This should be considered
as a strong positive factor in this community with a limited
if not short housing supply.
(2) The proposal is in conformity with the development of the
central city. It will augment the urban renewal plan and
enhance the overall picture of federal financial support this
city has received.
(3) There are no zoning stumbling blocks.
(4) Provision of the $650,000 cash investment, which is
nearly 258 of the total investmentr makes this proposal more
financially feasible than the other proposals.
(5) The principles Of Old Capitol Associates and the architect
are local and will be available almost daily to observe their
development. It is believed this will further insure an excellent
project well conceived, constructed, maintained and managed.
ROUSING COMMISSION
ADDENDUM HUD 52500A
LHA REVIEW CHECKLIST
OI.D CAPITOL ASSOCIATES
SECTION A - EVALUATION OF SELECTION FACTORS
1. SITE.
a. Recommend YES. 4-0.
b. Recommend YES. 4-0. The site in this proposal is not totally
free from adverse environmental conditions, such as smoke and
dust -smoke from the University of Iowa physical plant and dust from
the construction planned to begin in 1975 in the urban renewal
area. This is taken from a point of reference of the individual.
Someone from New York would not consider this as pollution or
an environmental drawback. The simulated traffic counts with
Dubuque and Madison Street closed for Burlington Street between
Gilbert and Clinton range from 28,713 to 21,334 at the intersection
of Burlinqton and Dubuque. This would probably be the Burlington
Street crossing point for the residents of this building.
C. Recommend adequate. 4-0.
2. DESIGN AND QUALTIY OF CONSTRUCTION.
a. Recommend YES. 4-0. The requirements as contained in the
HUD publications are the minimum acceptable. The living area
within the units contained in this proposal are minimal. The
bathrooms in all units are not accessible to a wheelchair occupant.
There is some question on the wood siding proposed. This
siding if added must be made fire resistant to some degree.
b. Recommend adequate. 4-0.
C. Recommend adequate. 4-0. One undesirable feature of this
proposal in relationship to Knutson's building is the long
corridor and the smaller space provided. The kitchen does not
provide turnaround space for those in wheelchairs.
d. Recommend superior 3. Adequate 1. The attempt to reduce the
overpowering effect of size the architect suggests a wood shingle
siding to soften the appearance. The change in color and texture
will help this cause.
e. Recommend adequate. 5-0. Could not evaluate quality of
construction, therefore only materials are evaluated.
3. PER UNIT GROSS RENTS
a. Recommend Equal to such maximum gross rents. 5-0.
b. Recommend YES. 4-1. This proposal includes air conditioning
within the units but has less space than the other two proposals.
The same amount of planning for providing amenities, etc. is
not apparent in this proposal as is in the Knutson proposal.
C. No tenant purchased utilities in subsidized units.
4. CREDENTIALS OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER AND/OR OWNER
a. Recommend YES. 5-0. It is recognized the Old Capitol Associates
is a relatively new firm. However, Hanson, Lind, and Meyer,
the architect, and Link incorporated and affiliate of Old Capitol
have experience in the development and construction of housing.
If this is the tentatively selected proposal previous participation
certificates could be obtained and added to the proposal.
b. Recommend NO. 5-0. See above. As indicated in the verbal
presentation, Link Inc. stated most of their experience in housing,
both construction and management,is in the middle income grouping.
C.
Recommend
YES. 5-0.
See above.
d.
Recommend
YES. 5-0.
See above.
e.
Recommend
acceptable.
5-0.
f. Recommend YES-. 5-0.
SECTION B - MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY
1. Recommend YES. 6-0.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0.
3. Recommend YES. 6-0. The experience and qualifications
of the firm to carry out project management and maintenance is
identified in the management plan.
4.
5.
No agent identified.
Not applicable.
6. Recommend YES. 6-0.
SECTION C - COMPLIANCE WITIi EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS
1. Recommend YES. 6-0.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0.
3. Recommend adequate. 6-0.
SECTION D - EMPLOYMENT AND UTILIZATION OF LOWER INCOME RESIDENTS
AND I3USI14ESSES LOCATED IN OR OWN1 D IN SU13STANTIAL PART BY
PERSONS RESIDING IN TIIE*PROJECT AREA
1. Recommend YES. 6-0. Old Capitol is an Iowa City based firm.
2. Recommend YES. 6-0.
3. Recommend NO., 6•-0. The Section 3 requirements are not spelled
out in the propo�;al. At this point in processing the proposal
this detail is not known.
4. Recommend adequate. 6-0.
SECTION E - OTHER
1. Recommend YES.
a. Kitchen does not provide a 5' turning radius on required
10% of units.
b. Does _not meet parking requirement for the zone to date, but
developer has indicated that an adjustment will be sought.
2. Not applicable.
3. Other factors having a bearing upon the evaluation.
a. Specifications state garbage disposal units to be furnished
and installed by contractor. It was not clear if this was for
each unit or the community kitchen.
b. Laundry facilities are provided, however, only one
facility is available. If this proposal is selected the developer
would be encouraged to add on additional laundry facilities.
C. Several lounge areas are provided.
L
d. Tubs are provided in the single occupancy, one bedroom
units with hand shower aparatus. Showers are provided in the
units for handicapped.
e. Garbage chutes available on each floor to a central compactor.
f. No specific references were provided pertaining to special
attention for sound attenuation other than the carpeting on the
floor and acoustical tile.
g. Distance of window from floor not provided. The heating -
air conditioning unit mounted under the windows will protrude into
the roomwhich appears to be uncomfortable for one sitting next
to the window.
h. Includes air conditioning.
i. Interior decorating scheme not detailed. It is hoped there will
be some latitude for individual choice within the unit.
j. Door widths to bathrooms appear to meet minimum requirement.
K. A designated space has not been indicated for arts and crafts
although it could be included in the community room.
TY7:
Fi d,,•. r. •.I
DaUt rt.,, nJ .1:00: d
•_-_.-- .unl Jo• I'Inlal ll. IIUI?I\1: CU\1\Ih�hl\I II
T :..• ..... •h.•rt•l.y n•.pw,l+ I In.,n in It.,- ptiu, ipal .uunnut .d 1- ------ _. ._.. ... .__ o. L,• irr+n r,•.1 "n.i.I Ihr !,rua r+6111. „1 Srrlir�n
Ill.. Sad,v11I Ilon1ing \• 1, +.lid 1,.10 1•, W- .anu,••I Ina fir+1 nl..r it, h, r. in,dlrl d.vrr ih,•d.
In .nr:mry of o, hifnrra during v.m+hurt into In. j_., i+ "el ilinnal (� Finn
'1')I^ ..1 \Lnl/•.ryn•r, ( I'\I �_. L11 _. ILS NV I'. r,n.fin 'lot \h.,!: ,. 10. 1, '1 It m,
A. I (it 11(711 Ann Pl •.Cltll' I Inti OF 11110P CRTY: _
1.' ...1 •r.r.. 2. 54e••1 r. \Ian,. Il•••hry 1 T,U..,1•y.` � a. r•a..•.ly n. .'!l.r• ..n., : IP l'.•.b
'ai rurnec Ceur' f. Dubnquc lata City i)J$ linum 40 JOhn::on Ttwa 52240
). r),.. ..r rr..l..It !" n. 911. vr.0 11 i.. .L.•. •r.r Ino l•r.ra rl....;
-7 1 •. �n -1 Fn11 fall iul Craarl Inn coral .11 ..n
�.]Ilrr.. (T.IIJ �.(11,•Lv ln•d ( ]Srmi-IL•ln,.h„'! -'). -- '`(d�•.,ar ]-lh+mt...f h.mt. �_]:_h.r,_• .A.�lel_
\u+.•'.t . / I'Wlry I1 Yu I71G a• IJ. t.nl A1:1..•q Ill.ir. •. .n.l Arr• IJ. • Loll R, 11..,1111 1`11111111. wn-I A,r.
-11.1.•,111_ \,.n-li.•v.
'�11•nq,.+.! , Court Yard Uuts idc 951`0 SF
;,_1 F.i:.linc 100 I -0- - 1 lone Cynmgnity 711_ttlo� ',1.'6 SF _
SITE INFOIi IaATtON _ tIl11LnING INFONMATION
Ii. nlexn.lan.r--_._--__�___—__ if.. 1'.. Ildn lIw•. C�\Lrul Lr. Inn•.I llansing _.—'— `_](',•nvrntinuali).
y ft. ur 45,000.•1. it. Ncv I i 11vhd.•. ('li'..mp.•n••nl•
300 ft. I. 150 11,1111
--
. t rp•.�n.r,tr•t •..t.wrt wvrJ.nrr)�-- In. L. ..Iar PLd.!r I:. S,.n, r„A .,+!.,e 1-.v Yi..., .,.,n �.. u...rt:.,: n:c
st-e Attachedansnnr RO.InC. One Hay Re TIC'
,
y 1'llru hn 11
a. Elf-ORNAIION CONCERNING LAND OR PROPCRTYI
21. J.
(T,r ,.,��- :!.n --_—.___ _LL -___ ._ Rr'Lltivn+hip-Ilu+inr•o:. Prr-
IT.nr Id.lithmal 'T—ft
oms bold, Anr,n.,] 1111+t,nding +,•nal or lhhrr Il.lorrn
.Irlpri rrJ I..,. h.r.•.• Ptire_ P_lirlor Averga•d t:n\cp!I toil- I',.t,d I:n_t .-31al Wtic— `.•1111 m,l llu)rr
18 Oct. 73 $121,500 $8,500 See ttached
11 Oct_: 7.3 s _54 000
-_-- f _ — s 1:34,000--
75. 111III!11,- i_.d•Ile f-umm,ml,L DL!nn.•• )n. Un..0+l Sit. Y1.rnra•.-
IG,trrXJ LI !l.t__S?te_ [A Colo. ❑ VIIIA Ft Iln.•: R•mer6nnn �] F:ln.ivn �g] \.,ne
.•'.•w. In r
AL_r] Poor Iirainap.• �._] Ilil:h ltnd•r Tnrlc ]� Ile!a:ning Rnlln
v7 I 1 5Ct.P__
�:.- .
\,,, ..I I.e, h -•Llv in- C. la•.1
F.nnily I.pr 1 nit ._ (}.I: I:1. ._.
.I2 445
14 537
12 I- 445
if.
TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY UNITS r 27,164.00
-
T
- - - -- --
_]n ft Silr
• I.npr.ry rttlrn It
Open Spaces
50♦ __
50± f Vim_ Q_�•-.per "10"III
•. -) -.e
Inil li.•n1
'Intal 111,111.1 llrnt
_._ _.. _ 1'o•nl•n+i 1_11__111,6+_ ._ .__..
I•rt 11_n•h
1`•n Il,il l' -pe _
119,1414.00
1 Bedroom -- Single Oce.
(t
2GG
(... •,1.....16•, .•I 1 tn} ...._• - � - -. 1 ..,
:,I l.ro ,•1 I i_,1 in Pr••ir.l
None N/A I
1 H40
e,J. VI.
1 Bedroom -- Double Occ.
664.00
296
I. 4,1!14.00
Sq. F'1.
t s �. _ per ..t. G. in,,.
1
t
]
u
Ila rid trapped
1 Bedroom -�
”
266-
2,926.00-j
Single-Qcc.-�-
TOTAL ESTIMATED. GROSS PROJECT
�;, IL6 ia. 'r:.r1 ..r 11,..., "� Uirhnn!,lu•r.
'
(-
2 Bedroom
I
338
I 676.00
x kit. h-” 11h.w+r I'.ln ; ITr1 L.y
r,•:l-,
a •• F ;:( llr 1•.,11111 111111th
111,,,1
X I.. l.n :r? F In10 i••. ' OCT..r rv) r tJ11
TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY UNITS r 27,164.00
J1.
-
T
- - - -- --
�,l ltrrolyd
Open Spaces
50♦ __
50± f Vim_ Q_�•-.per "10"III
•. -) -.e
-0 i
—_ —�
X • S. If V.nk
- Cuvrrvd Cp.l !elf
_ Q1.:•r month
-0-
-1140
J"• - NON-AEVENUL Fr0V1V !NG sl•ACL
_
____. ,.`pr .,f l nndm rr \,.. Ilnt� _-.
(... •,1.....16•, .•I 1 tn} ...._• - � - -. 1 ..,
:,I l.ro ,•1 I i_,1 in Pr••ir.l
None N/A I
1 H40
e,J. VI.
r t fill. 583 pi•r .1, fl.. n,a.
-
664.00
OlNer L.-Aelal- — 0 -._
Sq. F'1.
t s �. _ per ..t. G. in,,.
1
t
Nont?
__. _... __
•1. I'.. !1a 11.11
x 111nq G.I. of 1.1,:.1 .-1 nt.pn_.11
G \St (' Ilea ; ;C - Ilol ttme,
TOTAL ESTIMATED. GROSS PROJECT
�;, IL6 ia. 'r:.r1 ..r 11,..., "� Uirhnn!,lu•r.
'
INCOMC AT -101': OCCUFANCY
: 27,828.00
J1.
-
T
- - - -- --
10TAL AWWAL RENT h, :, a 11 - v•.a. 1s 333,1111:.00
--- - i--.-
J).f.-...Ji.
<.,
11.1V1J. g s•....1 .\,•1 ♦.r 1•...•.11'
.. ..1 Ae.._
72,142 -- V1- FI.
-
LG,=:'0 +. ! 1
1140
J"• - NON-AEVENUL Fr0V1V !NG sl•ACL
_
____. ,.`pr .,f l nndm rr \,.. Ilnt� _-.
(... •,1.....16•, .•I 1 tn} ...._• - � - -. 1 ..,
:,I l.ro ,•1 I i_,1 in Pr••ir.l
None N/A I
N/A
... _-
N/A- --
D. FQII;PuCNT A1.D SERVICCS 114CLUDEV IN RCNTI 't"'.•.: If,-, y v.r: ,' i:. 1.7.
•.
.r. F1J1 II'\II-\1'
11 1O
1. TF_nl'S
Nont?
__. _... __
•1. I'.. !1a 11.11
x 111nq G.I. of 1.1,:.1 .-1 nt.pn_.11
G \St (' Ilea ; ;C - Ilol ttme,
'--' \••11•!'1••1,••••,!•1,•
�;, IL6 ia. 'r:.r1 ..r 11,..., "� Uirhnn!,lu•r.
'
\41.•,..1 is 6.,, 111,
1• I`nn. 11.11
x; \il I•....•L.f•.;..,p, N!r., x: rmIn.,
Ft.Ct:.:IT•.,1
x
1.111„• s.-••--
x kit. h-” 11h.w+r I'.ln ; ITr1 L.y
r,•:l-,
a •• F ;:( llr 1•.,11111 111111th
111,,,1
X I.. l.n :r? F In10 i••. ' OCT..r rv) r tJ11
- \ 1 1 1 I r I Y•„ In l nil
i„ Va.• i t
Dt 71+pry Rudd -
(11111 II I I 1 1 . 1V `110 It. it 11'.1 11111
•1. !1.•,1, a t
Ornp•v in-Con•Inulity'SpacL ._,.
.•;;-.slimt)I11111 -...
1i'• ___ ._1..11.
I r+
C. ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL CXrENSCt
LSTIAIATI°U III 1'L Ai. 1. MINT COS TI
1
\D\IDIS rII \'1'I\�F:--
-
A aha. 1'nunral 1: m I I'•.pr„• nu•mv - - - f
1. bherli-ing • .. • .... _ _ _ . S _..
.__
A 31d•. tlllu•r l..uo) In.ln....•srnlw
-' _ . _ • _ _ _ . _ _
A 31.4 l'm,.l {cool I,.,I...a..•. u,. ....I.
_..._. ..
.I. IWI r........ • • • • • • • - •
slim 1 I I ills
�I.
TO TAI. AUVINIS f RA I IVE • • !
A .1:. Il..in IlullJinl:.... _ . S
nrl Itl,,r._
A Jn. .7.,,. ...... ,_--
-------•-•._--_.-_-.
6. FI -4I Ue.aing On.l
A 111, .111 ,•t Ler 16.11.16. p........ _ .
11 ....... .lir llnl ttm,-I)..... ..__
A 11. TOTAL $1 RUC rURC1-•-•---... S___
7. 1.1; Wing S Ili.[. Pen er -. _ .
A 1!. Cenrr..l 11 •••lu in'Ouyav ........ ........ S-
It.Rater............. ..
FG'S_ ---- _
•O. G.,. ................. --'-
4 L1, It n il•Irr'n 1:, n. O.erhead
I0. C.rl,. A Tra,11 IGmo..tl - - - - - -
' .... -
II•P.gn,ll
A {t. Oni Me,.. 1'r.4a
oI---_ ________________
-1 a ......... --_-_-
11. TOrA(. OPERATING - - - - -- 5
A I.I. At. 1.. Fee 11.••.il•n
1 I.U....... zing ------------- It --
A 16. .ln•h. ......
pa;rn............... _.__ .. ._
+_-_.-__•___ __•__ ._.-__--
16.I:.I,rn.•mat inK - --_..---•-
A I: . 11,.nd Ill, ml ... l..__._ ..._ - -
17.1:-I.,net•----••--• ---
A In. 011ier lee, ..............
Iil. f.rean•I Eli ... Ise - • • • . • -- ----•-
A 11). TOTAL I I.1:5
-
:U.TOT. let .dI Inyn... l.. ILinr. ane, 1t• 12 d 19) S
20 TOTAL uAIN TENANCE----;
SI. Cn.t Per Cw. S.I. 1'1. S
21. llrl:l.rrrinellt ncnrrv0 LgOI)J t Inlnl for•
t.l
.._, E!IIn..1 r.1 (P1Nir1.'1 l.•II 1 -lone - • • - . - • . - - - _ \lonlhe
C \IIIITI\1:1'll \Itl:l • S 11\ \\( I\('-
.
..tructmry Line •11)__ ______________t
-_ __....- -. _._._..
A, 51. Int.- -\I••..i .
22. TOTAL r:XMISE ••-•S
OnS_
TA S I:S_
23-111".0 Fnl.11e: 1,::1..1.•:e..rd
A 55. In.nran:.• ......... _ . _ --
iV.I.
S _-�-'- a
A 56. 1'11.1 \hg. Inv. 1`re.---
>
S --.- pet tIn00-. S ----' -.
A 57, FII.\ Klan'. Fee
21. Prl-oral Prop. F.t. ,1+.c.eeJ
A 5A. FII \ In.pre. Fee 11.3I _
Vol. S .._.____ ._-:�
A So. Fin.meing Fee
'
$ -----. per sntoo _._.- . -__--
A 411. ,\\trD I :J
}
2;•Fmpl. vn,rnn r ... --..•..•_ .� - ---. _
Aril. F\V l'I:S\I\ rrr I ':1
--
2n.Other ---- ---- - - --•.
A62. 1-;IIrA ❑reerd9,,,. -. - -. -
-!T.Odu•r-•••__...._.____
63. TOTAL CARR',INGCI;C-S.tFINANCING--S
23. TOTAL TAXES -••-•----• e
LFf. U. .ISIS 11It1: 1\1:\[111\- -
(
'!q. TOTAL EXPENSE & TAXES . = ....... -.. t
A it 1. 1eg.11........... .
A I.S. Ott-Ill.-Mi.,ri _ ... .. S
F. INCOME COMPO (ATIONSt
-
-----t-�•. ---
--
nf••TOIAI LEGAL \NP OI't,ANI'ATION• - • . .J_
+l
30•E.-timmed Project
A n:. Snpidrrortnal \:a•t.,,.,.,.•rt I'nn,l...... _ . - •S -
't
Cro.v Ineome (lJne 09 1'.tge 1) • - - - . " •
A an, Cru.ullan/ Fee ..... . ... . .... . . . .. $
31. Cie.'„ im"my (Forte Project)
69. 11n1lder .111.1 Spen<et Pr, fit A n1.L • . ...... i
I`rrrenlagc_ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_-
.0. COntingene1 11.• .rr........... _ _ ......S_
72•F:ff.•.'li.r Gro., In.ome(I.Nr30: 11)------ S
:L.TOTAL EST. OLVCI.OPbtENT COST fr..e!. of
(
33. Toed I't-ject I:ya•n.ev (6inr 20) -- _
'"•"• S^---_-_
LanJ or Off-site Cush(:? Ii on 10: 4 os r 60 +.
34. Net Income l0 Project (Line J.' - Line 33)--- 5 �
7 -2. -LAND W,t. Market Price Of Site)
31. E.p„uv Matin (Llnr 29 + Line 32)....... • --'--,_-
•r
4%000 5 J,9 3�500 00
-�
H. TOTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SETTLEMENTt
73• TOTAL ESTIMATCO RCrLACCMENT
;•
l.Dl:\F:1.pi'\IF:\1'CU$rs (L{nr :L---------5
i-~--
-COST OF PROJECT( Id!: J .......5
2. LAND ISIIFIITIJISUSS (Or I:anh required
---
_ Sewer .•f C.IJ. to -m r1 IL_ vl I:f,l:rnl
- _
ImoInl
f•,r lanJ argni.i6mil---------------- S
3. suit torm. (Linc 11_) -------------- s___
---...-__ _._ ._-.---_----
S
1
I.Mmigage Amount ---------- S-
'-
S. Fvc, PaiJb)'Other Th.,nC.I.h -S
-_ ---_
S
6. Line 1 ILine 5 -.--___._•__-_---_-t
-
;. C.1S11 IS TI:e1111'\1'nl:Ql'In FD (Line 3 -6) • S
__. _. .__...--_. -'-- - - - -- ---•-
t----
0.1NI'IIA1.0PFit 1'II%G It I'I*R:I1----- - - - - -- S
9.ANI Will rIT:1)1IM:11'X-7 -------------
-----•----•
1
I I.OIf-cite Cnn,unrri.v, C.•.t. . ....... . .... 3
-. - __. _
12.TOTAL ESTIMATED CASH REQUIREMENT
Il.ine. 7 1 J1 1 •1 t 10 1- 111 .... _ _ .. _ r
TOTAL
t
I. ATTACHMENTS: _ tRegv;red E.h:bils) `1----
.._ __. ..
n,
n
!.11 i•ne:lnl..l •1..:. ,. :,1
_ _ _-_.._-._.. _.
f• I ,.ralinn lJ,.p
-'
ht.
I'.•n: n.d I Ilnc.. ..,I X 1'r. !,t �t.,t..:,: n1 .•1 • n.,ar __
2. 1 )A1.11ft" Uf Site (Ar.INI Wj,::On Or Pnr•:lwi ci an.I L.'l'..I
I I.
I ..ra. ,.ql J•M1•, i.m_ i'. il'...... 1'•yll l.. D
Drnrrl II.,n Of PI.• rri♦
- _ {' {'
---..
I:. A
_ .. .. .-'._ .- -
Y,nm :.i ::: l en1r... ..... ,r..i .,r l!...I-.:.•r'. •t',.. r..�;....d.i,. on
J-
_ _ _Form 2010 E,pt.d 1'v,plau•a•n{ 01,prrt,mity Certife-ati.,n
I.T. A
lrlteleclnr.a 1 Jn1•1.. )l.ile•inm' '
.._.....
FOtm Jt33 Fai i1•ilit�aw \.. L-1'rJit COrpyr.rti•.n
It.A
_.
S• L.idrine Of 1_ut 1rm.•L.•n�th'h.m.aelinn Pri.r
..-
13.A
Ser .... ..... 111\1.• \,•,; I.; ------ -----------�
_ - ... _.._._ .._ ..
6. Clelrh flan Of Siler•
ln.A�.ia..n...
e� \:.!nt.I .\ tl I', -....ere 1'.....r.,:.•
'
_
. _ \L.n.l g, m•nl I'la.l1-.•1n
_ _
n
-_ 1 /ri•n. .ai.r lla.:,,•I.nC I'Lnl � •,
I I A
� - ---
\l.r,,r,. n. ,,t \e .. •,1
_ . . _ . .-_. _ --
2. Gsacral (},N rat ort
4 Mot Selcctcd
1. \O Litvrt
a Ilanecn l.1nd Heyr•r, 116 S. Linn, Town (:(ty, Town 52240 319/338-1555
L Jay C, Ouhler, 300 SivingR 6 Ltlan Pulltl(ng, Ttn;a City, Itun 57260 719/133-7511
K. CEit 111'II:A )ION:
l'ir nota •.ipn+l, a+ the vin. .ion,..r of Ihr pn•p.......I I..ort);a For. celliff... Ihm he i. I.uu.I iar ,nth tlo• pr i •i.•n •. of the lt. e•b .r...1
It.,. Fe4cral It nm. itq• Conuni„i....... n 1 4 1 r Ibr ah... I. nIcaliliv.l i4r, tion ..I the \.tti..aal Il••n.inp 1, h .....I II'M to fife i•r,l el hi, ln.... i 1, _
li.•1 it ..... ag.n h.....nsplie.l, ur ,.ill hr able In r.noply. otilt all u( the fe.1alfca roe. Ihn.•ol olu. h hue pr. trgv,-ile to :u,vr an, v .d the ..,.I-
... kA,r
"n-
atb!rr purh $ertion.
rhe na.lerafgtad fnnher e.rt if i••+ it,.,[ in Ih,• F.•+t of Id•. leo.. ledge and belief in, iuf.v m.,t iiia .a 1A.t .. nlain.'.1 liefoin r.r in On.. ,hil.;1, or
•na, I ........ t, li.tr.! hen•in .uc in ,Fla ....y Like ,.t "n wl.•. t and that tha•) ..n• It'll)d.•,.. ipu., .•! On. I.roje, 1 ..r loop, fly nbirh i, intended as III,-
my
hrrti ly lot the prupo,ed murtgap• incl that he p.op..,r.l ..n.•.0 n?I i.m hill uo1 . Wan. ...n ur:.•,.I... .... I, ... .r:.t n.'ticn, vl r,, .-td.
'I'Ite undrtsigned agrccs pith Ih, re-le,.d Ilomi:ryl :\.lod..i,2,af ion that inn :.na nt to Ih.•.... u!.. u'nt.. .d 11,.• 1'11.1 :t, nul.d i.n,•., (t) neither It,
IMF anyone nuthadzed to art Nr him will deeline In aril, n of rr ofhuloi.a. .:lAc a.,. ilaldr ..:q of Ihr p.ep n) ur hou:.ing it, Ibe a.e lliLonily p oj-
ut to a ptospcctive purchaser or tenant becanve of his rare, roha, ndii:b.n or nal nal of u.; lit) he Bill remply nith Iednel, IA I. and le. A
b., ordinances prohibiting di.+crimination; and (.:) hi,, lai)nle .v 111,1-1 to r ..... ply unh the t..p.hean•nt.. I tither (e) or b) ..hall he .t ;rn.prr
basis for the Coutn4s,ioner to reje. t rcyuc,.t.+ for fano, hu.ine,s oilh ahkh the >pnn,or is Ah"d'lird at lFl tale my W IL ",areI we a"0, he
may deem necessity. By, ilt:alltnJ 1 kt Iltcor OV., to
O.ae Noyp:nficr 20r- `il:ne'l BY
-ri _ t"71�
---- Donald A Sealena r..n...ri
REQUEST rOR CO:JDITIONAL COMMITMENT
Il): FEDERAL IIOrH\G (. 0)11,11silOSF.)t.•
PFlr-Inant to the pInvi•.inn+ of the Section of the Xatitmal Ilousinp .\et Welitified in the (hire going api•I;r Ilie.. and Ill \ Ile f:ol..tie u•.: I pl.. a•
14,.. .rete, 1..ynrst i, hr.rhy made fat the ia.umire of a conditional ramn.itmeni la in•ute a u.arl,L.p• ro. er in,; the laopen)'.Ir....ib.•,I al..•. r•.
\Iter r.amin.an a of Ila• appli,-atiuu and the ptnl...... ..I orit,. Ihr and. r-ifne.l : un<i.i.v, the pap., t to 1.r.lr,it.d.l e..nd ;,,I.l e_t.
j. ..t In Ow t• oaln'...f .h fit... emn .... it nu•nI I.) I' It \. In u..A;ng a I...... in Ila• Ininvipal .an ...... I rl !
•.L61, ,.If L.•ar iulcl,• t It . o.11 n•p2i..• ny... ...t el I.. in. .pal o.er a pear•) 1 .._ . month.. .n•:tdn.l; 20 ..'I .0 oath. d..0
pI"m to he agreed neon.
lnt aranre of a.lt'anren during comas. -tin, ( i•. , i, nol dr•.in•.I,
It is undemand that the financing • •p,n-%in the .un•,um A S -- i _aLp•, t to adjo_n..: Flt ,o III,- ..- Iciai ,..Il n: t
as eed _i. of the aoututtt of )Our commit mean.
Ilrrc%ith is ehrrl for S _ , ohich i. in p.t,mcnl of fit,- .q.pinalien Ire require.) by said FII \ llrgoh.tien,.
... ... -__________•__-.
' (f npcenl lfer.�a jrr/
REQIJEST 1 OR FIRM COMMITMENT
102 FFUI:IIAL 11111 SING 1.0\1\1 I SUO\ F: II:
Pur.uanl to the irovishns of thr Srclion of the S.htirn.d lleu%in Ael Went ifieA in the G vexing app!6 A :ell and FILA Rrgnlation, np O .I
blr tl.rreto, regnest Is herrhy made lur the isr.uanrc of a is. rev,Immrnl to in -we a rqo y,ge re.cmy the r2.•p ay drsotibe.I A r•
Vter e,.mtin.tlon of the applirution anJ the rrepe,ed .ccutll,, lite nn.lelli):n... I con -1.1191 Ill" project t.. Fr de,!tahle nm! i, iul.vr,tea in
making a loan in Ihr ptincil..d ano uut of 5 ., , nn hieh •• til 1•.vt inlet -,i ..t _,_- ..•til to -lade lc'.11-
mcnt of principal Flier a period of mono" a: e..M 14 n, ar.ottir.ule. plan to Iv acu•r.l apart.
In,urance of a-lvaures during cnn,trnelien j _ k. ie flat dvsue•I.
it is an.lct,tu...I that lite fin.nchir. e,pensr in the amotml of S -_-_..___._-_ i, ,ulj ret to adjn-t,::ent ,a that the
total hill net r,crr.l of lite anmunt of NeFlt • eln-na.nr a1.
Herr.tdh A ehrrl for S - -_.-.. .. ._—______- . ohi.6 i. in pal... Flt of fnr api-lie anon .tui ..r :....:.d::- Flt Ire n -pi -11A
by .,rid Fit.\ llegol.atiou+.
Sipei.._..._ .. - .. ...___ ..... --_._
?£3,500.00 represonts tares pro .raLi cost of
tcse�rch, Legal, auclit and inisccl.lanc,ous
carry.i.ng expenses fol: site 103-3.
a
i
t
III
I i'r..tecl Nnme
Section 23 -Low Income Elderly - ;Iowa City IA 22-2
TO: Mr. Chas. Conner -- FHA tlu tii-an ! ly Rep.
Thr undt-r.,t:nrd ht-irh re, ur%t, a loan in Ihr ,rinei ,al ainuunt a r1 to bre ,Minn•. ..( �rrti,
Y ) I I I : _l_a.l_.2.O�.QsL�O� in�nrrd undrt Ihr pn•
illr National linoninp, A, 1, aid Inan to he %I-, 111-.1 by ,t MINI nn,rig.tge ,at it,,. prnla•tir hen•in.rft,-I .! •., librd.
In•n•.na. ill a6%intr•. during Iim,frnrlion X IN, ( ! IN 11411 dreamed ;X' FeaniltiIiIY ('..n.1iiinn,.I F'ilnl
1 :ia .•1 '•: rl;:.•;,•,r: ! 1'\I I.il Il -S NI' Vellum.. Ill V.-fig.n:,• Ill[. d 111118
A. LOC- ATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTYt _
t — .-- J. hh:nlc ry•nl,Iv J. Cru eua 1'ra.l t, C._
Sa ::Ldr ural 711 l•..�1.
Benton Street Iowa City _ _ C:cdar �o���` Iowa
_ _ _1-- _ __ 1. �- �_
7. 1'y{.r .J 1•ralecl; 1 ". 1 nbl..t 11111.Ivor:
r hacvnlnr 1Cnikull •'•I.III on 4111 - 1"1rIial I:r,ncl - hn a Intal r -,blah
hr. r: ('tali.) X1 hr•lathrd f-1 �ctni-nrturhr,lb 1611,
'Gr, dr 7L)�
1 I
t—J - I , i ❑1 .Ini. L In�n,l. �,.I r,•
1 _i151 �iD.L- Ii. No. lliky. IJ. 4Nt ACC-/FV,I• II:Jt, 4. „III Area 11,1, n Lf/1 Fr. n•utl.•n Fnc,li,lr1 .,.. ..
}(;Propn�c,I It,•o--11118 Nun -Irv.
-ll:♦i tin l[ 62 2 _
SITE INFORMATION
DIrr.r :i ntel
_325 _ !'�!.e 268.7 rL nr 87,500
la. ::�.n l:,,.: (!r r,. r.r. rly •7.,rr[o,L u,l.. �rll .11'181811 ct•)
_ R3A
0. .':t uR_I_tAT10N CONCERNING LAND OR PROF
\rLliutntal co
--\„� irrd Punhnsrhlirr 1':ddorAct to
rl.
ERTY
T%
UUI1 DING IN7:H6I ATI ON
16. Yr. 11,1111in.n —., \Iall11Lr. Irltrd nnrl>.1111: �X11'nit%`ill -
Ai I I - 1 ol:yr„ll '1114 /1 114111
Ib. I:aterlor Irinlah 17. ?ina ,t.I.,I yyNrm 17.o Ftarr ::t .r.•m le Ile olio:-- \•t' --
.I,,,
+food & Brick Wood Jood & Conc Electric
.e711141- 2.1.0
Annual
n.I III, 'I'ol.rl
10-8-74 _ s 87,500.00 s_—^ FIs 107,500.00
. VI. 1:. irn - 14 Ole Communlix Distance :6. Onluual Site realure/-
, ._..� ,: 11:11 vire -
1 !.I•
0111F,talillini;
,87,500.00
r AlCJ 0 [J Cuts Ilor•k i',nlnnlianv
J rw r�� _O___ Poor Drainage � � Ilii;h Amer 'fable
Lil
C. ESTIMATE OF INCOMEI
77% \a• of Earh _Living Area
Fat.il}
60 490
990
I9. Na, Parking Spaces—
X; C,.!f
pneee-X'Sr:f Park
\rea-Ground Level
Other Levris
N
i 11. 4r,.• Fluor Are,_
Ll other (lire, rn•,
I');,!
)IhrIlu�i.L•a•., 14•
mal or r Ih•ti era
laid litlN.'r
NONE
X.
FI Ilriainint; R.,II•,
I litl( I'i to
I Iill ItI"\"ntl•nI.
I nil 11,'111- ! oi.11 \L nlhl, lirt.l
1 utupu.iNnn of I nil, I1rr \Lni:h I er I nit ki•,-
1 BR x266.00 .15,960.00
2 BR is 338.00 676.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY KNITS
16,636. 00
open spaces 31 t _ !,rr n..•n:S f f
Catered spares
Sq.
Pet ..I. It.. n,o.
per "1• It.. aro.
TOTAL ESTIMATED GROSS PROJECT INCOME AT 1001 OCCUPANCY [, 16,636.00
45,868 Sq. FI.
No. Itms;
TOTAL A`INUAL RCNT IIr: n. Jl . I_ r., .... I —L- 1991632.00�
N. Net Relatable Ica -,.Irnt,al Area— Jd• Net Nn.l..l•ir I. ....• I. I. lal
Arra_
319200
NON -REVENUE PRODUCING SPACE
Conipo, ilnm rl Vnit
I.�•r.41 toll . rill lit 1`t.•j,�•1---- - -
D. EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES INCLUDED IN RENT: tl'h,.d
i la:rr l:rat,r
Y'• L912 T_\_11: _\T
NFli\ 11
1 `
--
-
X or F.Yrr.l
Disposal
y 11 . fr:g_ full, or 1. (.•r.l
X i Nit C,,;t.l,
i_X
I.
f_.�Dinh,ea�ht'r
C its.
neat
('1•,d,init
il. t R nrrt
til i eniat.•nu:
fT.)I,ip. O,„)
A h, !:r It F:xhtntr•t
Car t
'
GLEE.: X;
IIr.t1
•x'
It'll
1'1111
• I• t ,n k Y 1'nriliti's
I., J Drap,”'
X'
i',•,.I ink
X'
A tt Coad it ian.nl:
l :; Otht•.ISp,.,.���1
X.
I it let.. I
I In 1
air
-- --- —
_ —y
o'CIIIAI I I l
l.: l
ural
Hot
----------------
IN err it
l t�;1'11811
■
ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL EXPENSE:`
unn\f•t 1t \ I t\ E.--
I. \d�rrli�illl---........
-firYOU�Vt V _
:IY
•�• \!.•,,,, lis tut. lit .. . . . .. . . . .
-.-----_-----.---
1,000.00
1. TOTAL ADOMNISTRATIVE
- g
I INC_
I.!••,,It,., \I., n. E.•,,. _ . - _ . _
r -1,_000i.00
Furl I fh-at t,g and
10X500.00
rn•t•,. •I„ u:a n.t!, t+.....
5 000.00
------------- --
_19,000 -.100 -
ti, (rah -----------------
1 000.00
�1QQG_VV
---------------
-
- )III -r ----•--------•--
TOTAL OPERATING .... • .
\I\I\ FI %. I\( I__
I), D+, r.,ItnF.............
.:-3000.00
11.1. 6l.---------------
J,0(L_00-
IS.
-
300.00
;16. 1,\t. ,link - - - - - - - - - -
I-.In..:.t,,.r--------------
-3,000.00--
i III.Gn,uO•I ---------
---
------------------2I)
----------------
21)TOTAL MAINTENANCE---- _
21, 111111.1• rn,cnl Ile:.,•,\•• I.IIUr,q t
Inial for
'ttll, IUrt•. Lint. 11) - - - •
- _ .......... r
'^_. TOTAL EXPENSE .....
15,000.
19,500
'r\\I
34.90- pvr ; Ioiiu_ ; 29,300.00
1. I'.•I.onal Proh, i'.t. \s.r�.wl
---- - rv't < I n,lo- -3,00n on
r-Upi. I,.%%Ion •r.,. - - - - - - - --560_00__
2u. Other ----------------
-
27.Other -•--------- ----- ------
21). TOTAL TAXES - - - - - - -- d -
n_9. TOTAL EXPENSE & TAXES • . • • ' • • . • • 3
8,300.0
59000.01
X7.800.0
k
0.'ESTIMATED REPLACE-hirNT COSTt rs:
A 16n. t'tlunutll land In,plp.,•„11.111 , - _ - 145;0010.00
A 101,, 01111•1 I.,Ind 1U,pro\-c•nu•lit 4 ..__ . 125,000.00
Twal 1.11,.1 Iny n„'enu nt. • .. • .. _ ..... 70,000 0t.
xrul ("rl nl:�... 860,000.00
A:17. Main Itl,il,lms.__-----------
♦ all, Itnlldinf,
A'11), Garap-•_________________
♦ II). \11w1wtnnildilign--•------ ..... ._...- 860,OGO.00
A 11. TOTAL STRUCTURCS...........
♦ 12. C,•1,1•tal __•- �O, Gl ax
FFF_.S- (950,000.00)
11. Iluil,l,•r'. C.n. 0\orh.,1.1 _2
....19,000.00 ._
Y
A I1. It,t!1,11•r's 1',.•f,l -
3{- ; _ 30,000.00
.14 . . . -•----..-_.....10,000_00
A 17. Ilnl,a Prt.l:,ntt1, .. _ .. _ _ ... _ .__. 3 , 000.00
♦ nt. OtI„•rrr............. 1,000;00
A19. TOTAL FEES ...............
_h3 OOO.00
'd).TOT. for all Impnnl%. (Liriv% 4t+. 11. 1: 1 t'll ;1,013,000.0
r,I. (:111 I'rf (:tU•.w \,I, 1.1---------------- ? _ 22._00_
5^_. f:�limat,•d 1'on_trut t ion I'iuu• - - - - - - - - • - - _,14•_ __ 16•ath�
C \1111)1\(. l II \II(1 � \ I I\ \\i I\(. -
,♦ iia. Inl. -
1850, 600 a - 35000.00
t'.Lt..------------- -560.-00
•----------- 1,000.00
♦ 56, Fii \ \R g. Ill-. Pre. (it. V.) 5,500:•10
♦ 57. I'll\ L..,rn. I-. ,• ,0. V.1 3,300.00 q
♦sit. Fn \ In••pt-t . 1 u). , ,) 5, 500.00 ! ;
i 23,000-.00
'
♦ 3t.). I udnt�in,: I.t l2 '. 1 f
A All- .\\IVO I r.) _.. --- ---'
A61.1'\\L\,'(.\\L1 I'rt• 11.5!
A62. Thir S Itet ordinR • ...... 1.5Q1�Q4_
63. TOTAL CARRYING CHCS. & FINANCING- • S 141.1800,00
10 LEG 161. AND ORC \X17. \'I'In\- f
•
_ s 2 , 000_._00 '
64. Leglll..... -.......
. �.,
•CVV.UV 5.
65- DfgJlliY.111,,11 . _ _ _ _ _ .. _ $
F. INCOME COMPUTATIONS: 66, TOTAL LEGAL AND ORGANIZATION • • . • .S__. -_2'`00.0C"
30.I:+iinurird Project r•• A67..Supplen„ental \lanagentrut Fund .......... S f'
i Gros Int t,mr (Lin. ('12 huge 1) - - - - - - - S �63L-r_' Q 60. Con:-ultam E're - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - -t -1���IIc
i 11.
(Ile, nit,lu.t (E:ntirr Proj.rtl 69. Nuildi•r .utd Sponsor Profit !C R1,tk - - • - • • - - $-- t $l'
{ Irn-enl-Igr- -------------------- _', a;[
' �_93.� ;Il. Cootin••rnry IL•::rrer- - - -S
?. Cf6•, tilt- Cro.+ Inr.•n1. (Lint- 30 x 31)- - - - - - S _ ..186, W- - 0 'I, TOTAL EST. DEVELOPMENT COST (f\r!. rt.
f
� . a , 272,000.00 p
S 11, rnlul Projt•c t E:�pon-rslf.:nr 29) - - - - - - - _ ___-8.0�6�r,�:. 0 La,:.l .r 11f( -o -if• (.os.,) (.nr #-:•.• i Fn 4 6: 1 (07 (1 • .. ._
11. Sr, In, en,r to 1't ojt•t t 11. i•tr 33 - Line 331• - - i 10_Q006.&s 0 LAM) ILst, Martot Vtirr ,f ?ilr•l
1.00 , 87,500.00
i 11. Eti•rne natio (Lint- .'9 -• Line 32)-------- 43- ` 87,500 .g, ft. ,. S _. per ^q.
i H. TOTAL REQUIRE FOR SETTLEMENT: C1. TOTAL ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT 1 359 500 ri
+
I. DE:\F.LOP\IF1'C CUS'IS t(.ine 71 --------- 5 1,2729000. 0 COST OF PROJECT 11.1.1 :1 t :..';• - • - - • • S -' -_
2. LAND IXUE:13'fBDX CSS (t r Cosh required t �ourev of Cn,li to meet Rt•, nin•1:,,•nt s: \_:.loot
for lan:l ac gnisil i.,n) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S __$1X500. 0
3.r•,'n'1'O'r.\I.(Line I+"_) •-----7-C-------$_1_359,500.
0- ------•-_._._._---
i •I•. Mortgage Amount " - - _ - - " - _ - � i L. OQQO- .00
1111 i. Fres Pu id 1 00 cr'1'han C 1a h .v
- S - Debt-Debty.r, ).--•-
6. Line 4 f Line 5 --------------------T 1.150,000. 00
7.CANIIIX\r.S'r\IL\'r111:1,11IItI'D (Line 3 2099500-30------
,a. I.NI I'IAL OPERATING
09,500. 0---- -
,a.IXII'IALOPE:RATING DIA WIT ---- - - - - --
S
9. ANTIC IPA 1I-1) 1)ISC011\'1' . - -3x1 _ - _ - - - - -
0. 11orRing -.1P• (2- of \11,;1. \mount) - - - - - - - - S 27;'OOU-30
I.Off-siteConstruction Cc.l%------------- S ---- --
•).TOTAL ESTIMATED CASH REQUIREMENT
(Linra7+11+9 E to f Irl ........ g 266,000. 0
TOTAL
ATTACHMENTS: (Roguirrd Exhibits) !•�- -_ _. 'rV - I'n\irol,n:,nt.d ?t d,t, al
1.00nt{on Siap -itis 1't non II I ut.m , 11 S ll it �Wt. •,, : , ..I moi•. + r . i •:,
Fc , ence of Site ('o tlo - o - _ _-
. I I � n I lOptiun of l urchus,) .unl Legal it. F, nn _:_d I nY,i u 1 a: 11 ,i ,!, n 1Ii,f'. , '
1-I.-C,
Description of I'mpetty 1 ♦ E ona : # u .•:,11,11 I. t . , Id .r '1, t . I
Eurm -010 F ual E:m to -mcnt irlity Certllic ntion- -�- 11. ♦ `\t.11_1__t till"I I
i Form 31331aiEibilit),uv\on-C!ofitCorporation _ II••
E:cidcnl a of Lam Arms -Length Ttans, tion Pnto JUA 1 ll ti F.1.•t \ . )
I-- ----S-i--' _ _-__ - -_-' ---- (1 . ♦. `I »r.l. :,t , t \t•!,ilr� t 1_ \ 11 I, +:r __ .. ___--. _-__ j
r Sketch Plun of ro
•
rntl'Iun ♦ 1I.•I \ o
t. l„1, t \ vl
i \lunngtnn- t ...,.. „1.1' .,--.._.----
i \ffimlati c 1lnrk rtin 1'Itln I!!. ♦
nUURCSSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS OF THE FOLLO:rINGe,—•_,—,.,_-,---,-_—_____..__.__..._—_._—_..
T Ls_DE.VELOPMENT,—INC. -- -- - -- —' -- -
1 _ _____�.1.2_P_rillS1n�e•1_S.tr_eet—____�iQux--�.i.tY•>,—Iona 5110.2,_—.____ . _._.__— ------
r,.•urrel f.untrartor '
l
CEF2T11:ICATIQN: --_.
r -I'l.e un,Lr-.i;nc,l, as the ptinelpal upon -,or of the- prof -tied moritial:tfr, certdirs Owl he is fauliliat uilh file pr n,i�l.at. ,•I tit,• II,IEI1L`ltI'ntl l,r•-
h^ ; ,• ta) Ihnr•ing f.omml<.tnner under the above identified St•c1ion o the National ll ll,in • \, t .116.1 111.11 t.o tit, I1 1 1uf 6i. l:u,•., rr g
the rnc:y ag.,r h•1:\ complied, or „ill he able to ronytly, wilh all 111 lilt n•q itr1•ntent� Ihrn•, f ,!u, 11 an• pu•n•qui•. ilr Iu in w.ut, , 1d fhr. rrorl-
na 1cr ,r: }. '•r•t Iiia.
ti I hrrrin or u1 lite rvbibits or
further certiflca that to the hent of his kno„Ic 1pe and belief uu ittfaruuat e.n 1n J.tu ,r rnnt.linr,
hr.rr n + li•1t1• I heroin vc in any l,ay false or ineorrert and Ilial lite) are Italy descriptio" .,f the• I•r"iecu or prnp••ll) 1,hi, h i,. ;n:cmled as the
for fhr 1`r, jn••r..l mart age and that the proposed ronstrut,iiott pill not violate zania� or Immi, r•• ar rr.tri, un,n.
,•( r,•, ord.
"Ile till 1. t'itti-1 sr.rces v.,ill the Federal Ilousing r\thninislrtrllon 111,11 pur:tuanl to lite teauin•cn'ul� u( tile 1••II,\ Ilrt:ul,llion:., (a) neither he
tp;r anyone an:hvriced to art for him will decline to sell, rent or otherwise -make available any of the property or hou-in_ in the tmiltifanlily proj-
ylocal
tct u. a prn,pr.eligion or nationic
:.t(,e purchaser or tenant because of hi Iris (uilus facerrc orrrrfa.nl to camplyhith the ttrgnirrmelntsrofteither ltka)l(it (h) shall be proper
'ani nr,!ir•ancc:, prohibiting dtsFFrimin?v ,
IJd6id for till' (•r araidelpaer to rt ject'�cquesis for future business with which the sponsor it, idatd,fir,l or to take any oilier co;rc, ti\r action he
t!
Pate! !..��(S port o 1
C_i
f'F_•7UGST FOR CONDITIONAL COMMITMENT —'
'TO: F•EOERAL. liOt SISf, CO\I\IISSIONrRt
t4 pursuant to the plovislons of the Section of the National ltousiag Act Identified in thelotegoing aig,licatu,o •11,11 I'll N Ii: ;;ul.vi,m. upplirt
v thereto, request (s hereby mode for the Issunae- of a conditional cummiUucnt to insure a atortpage eo,c•ring lilt- property 11— ril, d :ll,nve.
liter examination of fhr upplicntlmt and the proposed s,ruriq•, the undersigned consider. the prujrrl u, hr drsitaldr-unl i� intrrr-<ted,—snb-
�jr.ct'to lite it.,u.tnce of a (inn c mun6tmrnt by FIIA. In making eaann inthe principal rnuonnt n( !—_—_-------- '
vhirh will bear interest lot %, ,till require repayment of p iuclpul o,t•r it period of oavttlt- Ai" ot.l,nl: u., ,u,
j plan to be agrerd upon.
I Inaur4:e of advoncet, during construction [-_t Is, E, fY not dr Ind.
It i., undermoml that the (inntcing v%ficn•tr,irithe amount of S
is :.nt•jort to adjuxuurou .,• that rhe t,aal •till not
t weed �'F el rile .amount of your cl aunftmrnl.
t lirrewith is ch•-ck (or S — „ which Is in liniment of the appliealion Ire rrquttr,l by .aid I'll \'It ';tl,ut,l,n�.
I
f
REQUEST FOR FIRM COMMITMENT "
TO: Ff"IiICR.\I. IIOI.SIXG COMMISSIONF;R:
Prnuant to the provisions of the Section of the National Housing Act identified In the f•ltegoinµ appliratt,n,and F•IIA Regulations applica
sIe thereto, request is hereby made for the Issuance of a firm commitment to insure o mortgage co\rring the property dr..'ribrd .11love.
repay -
lifter rumination of the npplitulion and Ilio proposed t rcurity, the• undersigned conaidrr the Iuojrct 10 hr dr.urothhr and ll require rd a
ranking a loan in lac principal amount of S —
\\hirh will hr.0 intt•rr t at . ,ill regain repay
Ment of ,rirripal over u period of months,acconling ht aouotut: atiou plan to be nFrrrd
insurance of advtnresduring construction ice, t. u.. t dr.irr,l. --
t.othat t
i� .ul.j.•rt t,..1,1t,1-tm, ur he
U is understood that the (financing expense in the amount o) $ —
Iwil) not er rr,l _—� rs of the amount of your crmuoiun.•nt.
Ilt•r,:with is check for S _. , „hirh i. in pa);nrnl ,11 tileappl;..ut.,n an.l .v c,,nunilnu•ttI fro rrquit
�!
by sold FI(\ Regulation.m.
Slgnn,i
r.,(,aa •r (engage, i
Of 11.1
i
Ate Rice.
:r"unt--
a1•
1 hedute _ _
FOR FILA USEONLY
r
S
•:IA i'ORA NO. 2013 FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION
�i4e,. 8/72
APPLICATION PROJECT MORTGAGE INSURANCE
,'•oJ+ct N•t rn+
f0: _Knll.i;. rnn. _MO r_tg_age & Financial CO r RrIa ti ion - ----- :t:t.l tht• 1:1-.1w.1i 1. Ilnf sm, COM\n�>lu\I-: 1.
I'lt•• n.:dr r•:i}al,•,I IL•IvIly rets It tt:t (t loan in Iltr prinripitl xmiuul ar $ -- - to be in.un•d urolrr fho pro. i::ion+ of St -,:tion
shr \, ational Il u'Ivlll' \M, ::alt1 111.10 to :, l' SCl•IIMtI l)y' it (If�l I'I,t r::I ;(• an lhl• ,r •' 1
----- - - r? t • ( I h,'rty hrn•in.lRrr d,•xt•ri.,r.l.
Inr:nr:nu: ill ;ni::+ncr±.!uria•t con�inlr:ion is, _.. 1. n„t dr..in•d X I'ra.ibility 1._..i Cunditi,nwl
I'cl••• a: \:.,rt;pt.;or: (_� P\I i � L.0 .1 � li-� -.. \1' Prruana•ut \Iorlgt,;,: Inh•n•:•t Ii;it r
\. I.r7CATi0tI .1,�ID OrSCRIPTION OF PP.UPERiYt
$,rc+t Yoa. ^ Street
`.tunlal`•rI ([Y
1. Cennua Tract [, C,'„uuty
cornerof_Gilbert St &1�lash,
-'1'y,
lo\t)a CitJohnson
_
JT
low_a_
a a( V: uj •t: tx1 F.IOvillUi -! 1Tul ktl (3 \• \,..Swrin: y• F,; u:.tmlan: l t u u 13.,..•:nent F1c.•n -^
_ y_ ,.-• �(--`�\�:Ib nn Ian 1 •- I ,.tl-1(:r.ttel ,ltractutll
� 1 I�If:amt. L._.�It�mt. L._l>pacc ,L
� Ilm. (•1'-I1.) {-, Detached=JS'•:ni-I)oluchcd .9 tJ\Jtiradr _)Slab `„-{�:nld,•
't
-i,- -�•~ --� ' I iunl•cr of ilnit+ 12: No. ULIg,, le. Lut .\.•en,•ory Ultlga. end Area 1.1, a Lia R�•.�t. �tlun Pncilitlr •, mid ,ora -.--
(lrvcnuc �
iiIT, n,w,:d lrn•.
r -- Cra('ts room 650 s,f,
Ci:.ting_- 64 • • 1, none _�___• ' ___ _ Will t_i purpose dining,
-
517E INFORMATIONUUII_UING
•11FOOs
INf-OR\tA PION Patio 15 00 --ST
-..------SITE
;- sCe SU�m( 1. 1,:ed Arc ....
th. vr. uuttt
Ir..i (-�\t nnnr.u•tnr�•-1 �iou>dnf; -- �C1(:nn,•en ti,.n Lilly
It. LY schemb•t=''res s�t• f1•
� 1975. ]
\lodulen Conyu,nt•nts !toil[ .
3• (!f r••ecntfy eh rnQerC m,tar,lt ovldr•nen)
10. Exterior l+Inl,h
l:. Struatur. 5,••!.•-1
17.., Fln,.r Sy stem
IS. itea:In,t-r\�4:
youreci` color
post
Being finalized
Brick
& slabs
ten. con
hotwater
9. INFORMATION CONCERNING LAND OR PROPERTY:
,
Acl:LLionshipp-I)ttsinr.s�, I'cr-
Scnal or Other licn.r.•u '
r n,
Datc
20.
zt. --_
:\dditionnl Co+l+
22. ItLcuyt
hold ':\noun!
23.n
23.1,
llnt:q.nulinx
_:1c1uircd
"Ivria:rePricc
Ynidor,lrcnlcd
Cn,,;n,t 1(y�pt
T_oi•1( CU ,d
\tr (..:: 1. /
4rlfur:�d Huy-rr
O �tlOn
-!_,t`•d_,,
Il.t
11..:.
-
ro_m_ c�
s113,40-0-
s .00
s .00
s 1 13 400
s 11 3., IF00
-
.. Utilities- Pu:,:Ic Community Dletanc•
-_-- --
25. Unusual Site Fcnturoe
From Site
Witter � � -
�Cuia '1�F
F'il(n L1 Ilo(•k I�onnation:, n I•:ro pion i ��\oac
Srwerts ❑ (_� OPonr llrninngo � Ili;.;h ll',Itrr "l'.tblc [--� RctaininK R';dls'
C jOPtcr jC�cefly) i (liF Site
Impn,v••mcntn
C. ESTIMATE OF: INCOME:
27, No, of Ench Living Area --- ------
Farnily Type I'nit (Sq. Ft.)
60
Attended
_>( St -II Park
compo.-itiau of Unit.
_LR -DR K, 1Bir B_-�-�.
LR -DR : K, 2:•.Br, B__ --
Unit Ilent
Total lloulllly- Aunt
Crr )Iwith
For Vitit Typ-
260- _
x_15,600___
319_ -
SPACE
- 1 ,_320 --
1 Lc.l l••:.�r
\.•. {f 5.-.
TOTAL ESTIMATED RENTALS FOR ALL FAMILY UNITS 5 16,920 1
Opcn Space.4 50z "- _ per month
Covrred Spaccn : per month
-`°• `°m'"••r`'''
Laundry -vending @ $2.00 PU --- -�-�---_-•-1 28
:\na-G;onnd Level --- F.(. Ft. Z ,:----.--_--- Per .q. It. 'III,,. .
Other Lvvel.A - Sq. Ft. P ; - -- per xq. I:. Ino, !..
Ji
TOTAL ESTIMATED GROSS PROJECT INCOME AT IWOCCUPANCY-L j 7 .0 01}8 I
a
TOTAL ANNUAL RENT fiM:v 11 1 1-' ,•:.•::f1,a) !Z204 L;7!
13. Net I:rn'.i:,l•• 1�.•ri.l,•n1,.,1 .\q•a - -r i-. \ .-�� v,t ,^,_.. e:,•:..•r. ,I An•w-.1�_ -
1 ...,: i.•n of I. :��.. ::_ 1'. •�. , t -.. .. ..._
.1
' I',.•p.,1al lr
It..i..
NLIN•REVENUE
rRODUCING
SPACE
1 Lc.l l••:.�r
\.•. {f 5.-.
1 nE ..,-it i.•It of I 11.1
U. EO_tlPOUrl I' ANO SERVIC:S WCLUDEeD IN RENT: ' ': .'1 Ipt. '
------. ---
. It ,y: ...,: ..
t,y,.,'„
It,•.i•.t-•ai
. t. \ �; it,.lt
\tr (..:: 1. /
r);.!, 3
't ,,•1,..�
' It• ,�4
VI 1 IILL
Il.t
11..:.
,
1 ...,: i.•n of I. :��.. ::_ 1'. •�. , t -.. .. ..._
.1
' I',.•p.,1al lr
It..i..
C. ESi'IMA1'E Or ANNUAL EXPENSEt
I.Alkerli..l'------'---' a
n, \Lrttaxt•ul.•nt - - - - - - - - - - - -
3.0111•r..................
I. TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE
+ �,. I:Ir,ntur thin. I•:xp. - • - - - - t
L. Pur•I ( 11v lin; and
Itonlc-.tir FI„t \\':Iter) -----
7.
---_7. IA;:lltirte S \fisc. 11mver--
II.11ittrr --------
-----------------
X
______ -----------------g Tr,r•h lionlovnl- - - _ -
{ I!.PoyfolI ---------------
:I"-.Ofher -----------------
TOTAL OPERATING ------ S
I I.Devoraiiii-- -_ - --
Is.Re!•:lir.---------------
16.
--------------16• F, x t ern l i r l a t i n..- - - - - - - - - - - _
17. Insurance - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-_
•• III.Ground F:xpeno-e---------
19. Oth,!r
-------_19.Oth,.r ---------------- -
2t) TOTAL MAINTE'4ANCE - - - - g _
21. Rrplircn,rrnt fleseree (.0060 x total for
stnleturvs Line •11)-- --.--_-_--,__-
8. Iwo
Ell
ro
22• TOTAL EXPENSE ----- S 2 240
23• Real F.-t:lt(-: 1•:+t. Asse:•scd
Val. _
1 r.
S -_-_--_ per.41000- S ,
„ ^ I. Por.onal Prop. Est. A,;sassed v
Val. ---
S ---�- her. -1000-
, ?S. F:mpl. 1'.n roll Tax - - - - - - _ _ _
26. Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
27. Other - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
,i •'0• TOTAL TAXES ------ - - S 20,800_
20• TOTAL EXPENSE & TAXES -------------
F.-INCOME
--------- -.F_INCOME COMPUTATIONS:
' 30. Estinl.t:ed \'Inject
_ Gro,::. )nvolile (Line C32 Pubo 1) - - - - - - -
3!•Occtil'•Inc,' (Kat ice Project)
33. Effeel(, a Glass Income (Line 30 x 31)- - - - - -
'13. TotalPr+j.••9 I:xprnr:es(Line 29) - - - - - - _ -
:I1. Set Inr•o:ao to Proj.-.•t (Line 32 - Lina 33)-
35. Exprtt.e Il.tt io (/,inr 99 ;- kine 321- - - - - - -
3 LU! -!_r
S 19k,"
r�
H. TOTAL_ R_E_QUIREi4EN_TS FOR SETTLEMENT: _
I. DEVELOPMENT COSTS (Line 71--------
2.
-- --_'. LAND I.XDKI1TED..XF,SS (or Cash te4luired
for Lunl acgr.isition) - -r - - - - -- - - - - - S , �1� 1 3 2 400
3. SUBTO.1•.11.(Lille 1 F2) -------------- 5+84; 68
4.ah,rtgage \nieunt---------- ,1__,336300
;. Fcc:: ['.I id by Oih^r"TlutuC.o=h - S _ 1 24,0
j'6.Line •1 i% Line 5 -------------- S146029-70
1J 7. C.:1Sit n\ F:�)'.AIEN'rRF:QI!IIlED (Lille 3 6) - S - ''23: 798
! III INITIAL OPIALITING DErICIT ---------- $- -, t�--r-�._
9.:\\"1'ICII`\•It:U DIeCOIINT-----5� --=-- S 66_- 8_l /5
111.'.Torlini:
I I. Off-site Cnn:.triwtina Coon _ - - - - - _ - - - - g _
12. TOTAL ESTIMATED CASH REQUIREMENT
jjjj (Lina 7 it 1-1)+I(I F In --------- 117,
117,339
ATr:,CHbtE`irs: (Rc.uire -
a --' ---_ l d Eshi hits) _..-
__ li
E,idcarr 4lite Cuatrol (Option er 1'nn hasr) and Lr.i.al -
�•- I)e.•r.pti•n,ofPri(•r•rty I:
-t Tin `t)In 111:_1 F r:plo,n:rat 011portt,nity Certific.a.rin
-!-I ,t•: it."i 1 !i;,iinittv.t. Xa:r-I'n.(it C urfwc.ltiuu • - - - - 1
I F:•.i.i•-n ..( L.+•.!:\Ints.Lr•a th 1•raa..trti..tt Pntt
G. ESTIMATED REpLACEMENf COST:
A 3fht. L'uu�u+tl Land lay)rov(.Iaert:t - - -
A 36b. Olhur I..trul [III l•tO%I-Itelit ,4 20 OOO
_1 36c. J'ot,ll f.,:t]td hnprotrna nIs .. -.S.z.� 000
.. ' f. -STII.
A 3-- Jlain Iluildings - - - - - - - - - - -
A JH- ;Accessory Ihtilding%
A 39. Garage - - - - - - - - - • -------
_-----
A •10- All other Huildiuea - - - - - _ _ - -
a •11. TOTAL STRUCTURES------- s958�339
A 12. General Requirvinents _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ S 29 350
FRGS_ $ ,007,6.8T
A •13. 13uilder•:1 Gan. O,rllu•,ul `
2 ------------- 20 154
A i•1. I7uildcr's Profit '
e ------------- BSPRA
A 45. Arch. Fee-Dcsign --
------ -------33,254
A I(;. Arch. Fee�Supe'r.
T 1--111.085
A •17.. 13ontl Premium _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - 8 , 000
A •IH. Other Fees - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-E�,7000-
A•19. TOTAL FEES ----- --- 5 8O- ,493
.-TOT.-for all Imprints. (Unes 36c, .11, 12 t 19) J,0881 182
.'+l. Cost- Per Gross Sq. Ft. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ s
52'. Estimated Construction Time - - = - - - _ _ _ _ _ 1 2 \loath.
CAIIIIYI\C CIIARGRS R FI\.\X(_ING.
-A.Ti3.Ino � �• �_'_ 1
A51.I'll xas-------------- 1-,.590
► 35. Insurance -- - - - - - - - - _ _ S" -Q 00
A G: FIIA Nltg.Ins. I'rt•.(0.5'e)�,_�8.
A 57. FILA Exam. Fee (0.370)
P, 58. FILA Inspcc. Vve (().51") -
4 59: Financing Fee ( q;) ?b-, 26 _
.A (30. AMPO ' • ( !�) _
A 61. FNdIA/CN.IIA Fie 77,
2 00 t�044
A 62. Title & Recording- - - - - _ _ _ tf , LIUO
63. TOTAL. CARRYING CIIGS. & FINANCING- - S 145 . 116
LEGAL AND 011CANIZATION-
A6d.Legal ---------- - - - - -
g
A 65. Organization- - - - - - - - - - -.g 5.000
66. TOTAL=LEGAL AND ORGANIZATION- - - - -S 77000.
A 67. Supplemental Manai;em.•Ill Fund - - - - - - _ - - -S b 00
S
A6i. Conanitunl Fcr---------------
- - - • -
69. 11.1ildrr and Sponsor Profit & Rink- - - - - - - - SU , 6 70
70. Contingency llt:ervc_________________g
71• TOTAL EST. DEVELOPMENT COST (E.ccl.of
Land orOff--site. Cost)(SO Fti:3}rib+6: F15d+6!) F:OiS �-.371 ;u8
12. LAND (Est. Market Price or Site)
sq. it. o $ per sq. rt. S_ 1 1 1=00
73. TOTAL ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT
COST OF'PROJECT (Idd .•1 t 72): _ .. _ , _ S) -1-4 84 7l:•s
$,,,.tree of Cash to mr•e•1 Rnnnirn m.•wr-. ,
Cash Sponsor
Credit Sponsor _
1-26.0726
i
TOTAL ' 117,339
- _
1 ntir+nmutt d <ta'�• t,•tit-�.-�--
Pirsnatl Fatul,ial_\
t:�_•_li� �t.i',,.a,.�: .,Tti:.:.,.r,-.__... _.
F w : CIS. U I'rr, 1 , t \'.Irl
._._.._.-- - .-
1, 1( t ioa l :r•.1:';
FIV. t ^-,i_2i (:arlt t t„1'..tt,l
n
ur \IortC;.,.: •:'. ( r•; - �•
_\t`hrtt_rtur.d ! .hi!•if-.-I'trli�r.n.::y
_ _ .-
\n•hi:c:htra! I ,!u!•It•..
! i.:.tl -._._ _- - _
`•:,tet• .tad 1'11 \ I' o
\, , • I •; _ ._. ...-.-.
tt l•iti r n! \ '•.t. 1
I It I -t sur.-,,. ._. _
i
D�� f'-ni tion
zz
it
-OR OF CObIMUN-±TY DEVEhOpMENT
Under ad,ninistrative direction, to plan, supervise and coordinate
the Planning, development and redevelopment activities of the
Cit,•; to administer the zoning regulations of the City; to
oversee the Building Inspection and Housing Division activities
of the City; and to do related work as required.
Examples of Duties
Plans, organizes and manages the community development and redevelop-
ment activities of the department; directs the maintenance and
revision of a comprehensive plan; serves as technical consultant
to the Planning and zoning Commission and directs the preparation
and presentation of reports and recommendations to that body;
serves as advisor to other assigned commissions and committees;
administers zoning. regulations to include recommendations on zoning
variance applications; advises the City Manager on planning and`
development matters; directs the redevelopment- and renewal activities
of the City;. oversees and reviews the work of building and zoning
inspection, enforcing state and city building laws and ordinances,
and issuing building permits; reviews and investigates violations
o,_ building, housing and zoning laws; directs Housing Division
activities; directs the coordination of the activities and programs
Of various other agencies with City plans; prepares an annual
budget; prepares and presents oral• and written reports; supervises
the training of subordinate personnel; interviews and recommends
the hiring of subordinate personnel.
Employment Standards
Education and E:tiuerience: An-
y
frs;, college w•ri to a degree in city oraregionaliPlanni nito graduation
ng
related field and five years of increasingly responsibleor a professional
planning experience, including two years in a superviso caaciy.
supervisory capacity.
Knowledges and Abilities: Knowledge of the principles, objectives
and procedures of municipal planning and development control;
knowledge of the techniques used in the development and maintenance
Off comprehensive glans; knowledge of the state laws relating to
subdivision, annexation, zoning and land use; ability to collect
and analyze data; ability to prepare clear and concise reports;
ab4:lity to supervise employees; ability to establish and maintain
e:Ere-ctive relationships with City officials, employees and the
public; ability to speak effectively before groups.
Definition
Cinder general direction, to assist in planning, supervising and
coordinating planning, development, and redevelopment activities
of the City; to assist in the administration of the zoning regu-
lations, the building inspection and housing division activities
of the Citv; and to do related work as required.
Examples of Duties
Plans, organizes, supervises and reviews the -work of planning
division professional and technical employees in the preparation
of studies, reports, and plans related to comprehensive planning
and current planning; coordinates urban redevelopment and renewal
activities; assists in the planning, supervising and coordinating
of the Community Development activities of the Department; super-
vises the maintenance and revision of the comprehensive plan;
provides technical assistance to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and other commissions and committees as required, and supervises
the preparation and presentation of reports and recommendations
to said bodies; assists in the planning, coordination, and super-
vision of building and zoning inspection and housing division
activities; assists in coordinating the preparation of an annual
budget; attends meetings and conferences; acts for the director
in the absence or at the request of the director.
Employment Standards
Education and Experience: Any combination equivalent to graduation
_-om college with a degree in city or regional planning or a
related field and three years of increasingly responsible professional
planning experience, including one year in a supervisory capacity_
Knowledges and Abilities: Knowledge of the principles, objectives
and procedures of municipal planning and development control;
knowledge of the techniques used in the development and maintenance
o� comprehensive plans; knowledge of the state laws relati*ig to
subdivision, annexation, zoning and land use; ability to collect
and analyze data; ability to prepare clear and concise reports;
ability to supervise employees; ability to establish and maintain
effective relationships with City officials, employees and the
aublic; ability to speak effectively before groups.
Under direction,
ada,inistration of
and to do related
to supervise, review, and participate in the
current and/or advance planning activities;
work as required.
Z__amples of Duties
;_ssigns and coordinates work assignments and reviews plans,
designs, estimates, and research studies; provides technical
direction to the professional and.technical staff and participates
in -the compilation of data used in the analysis and development.
of the �tiiaster Plan and in various community projects; supervises
the review of subdividers' tentative and final maps, on zoning
variances and all other zoning matters; consults with officials
and the public on planning and zoning problems; prepares recOmmen-
dations for and attends public meetings of and presents plans
on recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission and
public groups; designs and prepares final maps.
Employment Standards
Education and Experience: Any combination equivalent to graduation
from college in planningt architecture, or a related field and
three years of professional planning experience.
K nowledges and Abilities: Knowledge of community planning principles
and the Tactors affecting community development; knowledge of and
ability to apply research and statistical methods related to the
collecting, compiling and analysis of basic planning data; knowledge
Of the techniques involved in drafting and graphic presentations;
knowledge of state and local laws related to planning; knowledge
of engineering drawing and topographic mapping; ability to collect,
analyze, and interpret data pertaining to planning and zoning
situations; ability to supervise -and review the work of others;
ability to establish and maintain effective relationships with
others.
Dz2finition.
Undar direction, to perform a variety of technical planning -
rcesaarch and analysis work; to make investigations and to
participate in the day-to-day administration of zoning regu-
lations; to supervise the collection, analysis and compilation
Of basic planning data; and to do related work as required.'
E:camples of Duties
Supervises and assists in the design and development of advance
plans in community development and redevelopment; directs the
preparation of base maps and graphic presentations; assists
subdividers in planning subdivisions as to design and confor-
mance with planning and zoning regulations; supervises and
participates in making planning studies, surveys, maps and -plans;
supervises the collecting, tabulating, and analyzing of data
related to planning; supervises and participates in the preparation
oL land use, transportation, recreation, redevelopment, social
and human resource and other planning programs; makes studies
and investigations of rezoning applications, and of land use
problems, and makes recommendations; administers zoning regulations
and advises the public and City officials regarding zoning regu-
lations; prepares correspondence and special and periodic reports
on planning and zoning matters; attends Planning and Zoning
Cormission and other meetings.
Employment Standards
Education and Emperience_ Any combination equivalent to graduation
from college with a degree in planning or a related field, and
two years of professional planning experience.
Knowledaes and Abilities: Knowledge of community planning principles
and the factors affecting community development and operation;
knowledge of and ability to apply research and statistical methods
related to the collection, compiling and analysis of basic planning
data; knowledge of the techniques involved in drafting and -graphic
presentations; knowledge of state and local planning and zoning
lags; ability to supervise the work of planning assistants; ability
to establish and maintain effective relationships with other
employees, officials, and the public.
, ,,,"', , - , ,i, , , f
, �, �; � `,- -,�., - _,,t,,-,-, �� ,., , , ,,_
, I K , � ,,�,�-,�,�-.�,I,t�;,� . , � I., . - I I - I ,_ . -,
- , � � I � ,.�i� q - � ., .,.,-'I:-- �, �L �. J �11- , ,�� - - � � � , _ � ,� , �� .: - , - 1.1". I ,;, � � -, I -1,
_ , . , ,-, ", ,. , , -, o - - , -,- -t�� -- - -1 ". . - . , : .. - , ,
__ - , - %�, - , .. . � ', �, . , - , , - �, , . � . .� , �, ,.. , ,
lk� �� - , , � -1 . � . � .. - I . �z-, , " - ; - , 4.;:,,,__ �.I�, ��-� zj�,N, ,,� h . _Ai�,, ,,,,� ;�: � � - � � , 47 - - r ,*. - 11� . � ., I ,. . -, , .. �;,,, -
� - - - - - - � - - � , .t. --- , , I - �.
- . , .. - �.7-.4j� ,,--.,� � - 1�1 - I ��.
r -, �,. " - - , ;i - - 3,,�� _�. -
1, . �.,, . 'af, " , �1 I �
v,I -, , ,. 7p�,�, 1� _*� . , I., , 4 , . ..
, - � , I ,. -.j � - -- 3�?, , , , " ."'. . � . ,,_ . ,,, 1, . �, I � - -. , . � I ,.. 3 4� � f. .. - .- ,
" , 1� �, -�f - - I " , ��V, , .1 g,��;, 1. - .- , - "'.. - 11 .— : ,., ��
- a I , . , , , -, , , - - - . - _111�i P�,_,, �,-; . '-.I- ,-�, .. .., I -, , , v
,; . � ----- -- � - �;O, I �,
_� - 5�, , " -1, - �4,�-�_
-, .. . 11
�v -, 4�j , � - $,:,I, ,-. �,-. . , . , � , � -, - I 11 I I . It . .-4
I - - -1. Y_ " , , - � , .
e-. - - - . , 1 -r �_,,,�,,, , � - 4 �, _� , - � I -, - ��
, ** - - , - --, " - ! , -
� , % 1� - ----- ; . U - ,-, � h:f-,�N%w-�!�,Ir,,.1, ."
�,� � � ,�_ � ,,I�
., - I ,— f - , -,� �;� . ..... � � , ,,_,,v�,,_.�,,, -,I� _4�- .,'
;_ - -_ � ', . . . 1. . .
, I � , - -� . .-, , L, I . . - , �;
. 4, , .1,
-,-'T . , � - '�,-- - -- ,
,� - � �
- � - � -
�'L 'O ', ' - ' � , ., , -1 � I .
i -N,, - _ _ I . , � � .. � -
J,4! I I � � I :. - . , I � , I
�
I , - - -, , A..
� Iy;i.,,w , .-.7f - .�, i
. � � . - � _ I - I -1 - I , - 1-1-%': .- - �� .. - - I � I- , - - ,� ., - - , : i - ' ' ' - I - �� - - '
-1 -1 � - 4 - , �_. .x�c "I - 1 23 ,-1974-1. :� ,. _� - :1. � �
�. 1. �,, .- �11 F, I- , . 11- , .,.:. I ,
-,� ;- - -,-� - - - f -i,-.- � ; . . - . I
. � .- � . -1 - ,
� , I 'I. I .1:
- ', ,-,�.,j,�,,-I ,Z� - �
,� ,. - . - -1 . -
_j, -,_� - - ,. , .. ,
- -,-- , ': -, --"�- -.--- �_,W`_,_.I i:a: . d '.f,'.'_. .� ", ..�. . x - .
, I I - �,. - � ,� , �� .1.11 ,.
- I. I - * "I. , �,- Z� . ,
_7 , . - . I � -- , --I -i , ,", - - " �� - 4 , -, .11 -- I , - - , -, I ,.;n,
I., I � � , , --..-" 1". . : - � -
- _�: i -I 11 ; - , � _,,. 1, �,- I. .; __. I., � ---: � d I � . I
:11 If - I - I - - z - -j- . I - -, -,- -,'� � I .
.01 � . . - � . ,. �4111 N , � ,.-.I �- -;, � , �� , ,� �, � . � ". _. � . . -.,. ,�!,
, , - . -o_ ,� � ___ .. - ., "" � ,- _. 1. �,
- . . I .1 ,� _� * -1 , - - . .., -
. z . � . ,�_ . ,, . 1, , ,-. , . - � �,,..: . I .
- - , , , !� � � , f; � ., . , _�, -) -_
I . . _ _ 1: . 1, I- -- ,.
- • - � - - _ . � 1�
., 1. �, � - " _V, ..�., __j,_ ., , _ .
_f4 - - - � -1 , - , ,. ,� ,.,,�,�. - I - -1 I . , __ - �_
11 , - I %, - , - - -�� - _;�,, _,__, I , - -1. _ __. , -,
� :, - - . . ;Z-1, _;
- - .7� -.1 lkf,�,__ f, I _.: , , � .
.. - - " .111 I - 1. . , ,�,
I . ,. , I � , I .. . , , . 11 ,; � f7�_. ,_., - z .. I Ai� � 4 � _. I - . I �
�� , : , I I I - - � I � � - z �:, . ,.
. :. - . � .. . . - , � ,
, . � � -� - .1 - . .. -
,. I � .1� , . �.,; , ��7 , �, , . . �
. - . " I - , 1- . O , .t - �., 'i .- -
L
-, - - � - I I - -, I :1 � :.7,
- - ,r_.
, .� � _�. . ,
,'s• .- ,.I. I -
,� - - �� , - 1� ,41. - � � , I. ,_ . 1 ,%
, �W ,jgr � �� . , , - . �_, I.- I .. - . . , , ,-. , ��, � I , - - �f '
�-, �- -, , � ,� , ; .1 , . ,,�, ,4,_ -.,, , � � � !:I, ,_� * , - �� .1 - - , .., ,. . I .. 1-1,
� ..... . , . � . I ,� . - , - . I ,,o :_-� , , 'I." !,
� . I I . - __ � ., . " -, __ � , - - -�� ,: � ,� 'i" -'-',,. � ,�2i�z! � . I .
, � � .. ,: .,� - ;, , ,� , , ,
, , � ��_ LI . � _,,. - , , 2�.,:". , I - ..., ' I ,
, v ,,j::;_� . _�� - ; �,. , , , , :., * .;
,��.�.-- . . .- �. . ,--
I
:4, ;,,' -,.,S��Iv;,.,,O, �,.i, .
... ,
�, " , , �% , , " - �S, . .. � ..- ."jf, ,4 F; . - - � ,
- . I 1. �: . � . .. -;�, - ,
. i .: Q . , I- ,A ,.. .I - J� zv,�,,-,. -. ', , � , . . � . - - �
— --- - , . - - -.-I. . - -, - - - � . ,., �� , , - .3, - -,.,-,. � . 1. I" �
2�.,, - e � . I - � - - I . � �rl " - I V. - �.
� - ' x..1;.11 I. -, .�,j�' :, , , -. �'7-- ' - ,,'- - " *
- , ,
, _-,--, , .� ,--- - L , , , ,.�, 1� ,_ � - �, A.�,.. , " �, , ;, �-
. - � " , , I �, �� �, , , � , -� ��,._ - ; -
I . � .-- --�_S- - , - , ,. ,-, ` - -,.,7 -, - � .
�.. I � I I , �� . , ,.-,, -,. - � '. - -
- , � � ,,-, - � . � , " � , , - � , - -� , , .,._I,I - , � - I ��_ , _;��, : I . -
-
- - -
,L- 4 .,- I - ,
- � �. � -. .-- � w
- I lr . _9 -Y "I ,� - �
- *_ �I -4 . � stem;, lder,-�, 4� �.
, I , , - �,�, ".
, I Z, , _ . ... .. �, -�j. ," , I., , , �,", ..".1. , f ;
t7l - . , - 11,,� I I .-_--,� ,,. �,,! � __ . � � -�, -,�,
. - �,. 1. ..I., - �r_ - * - �, -, , _. , ,, �. �. I. -1,1�. ,
f'. I I ........ A -,,,, '... - ... ,
� _. ,!� __ __, � I .
-, -.N-*�-�RLi�m�idii'Drive-��:-;'k--.--,,��., " -- -11 I,- __ , , -, I � ,_ ,
I i" I 1.
44T ,- � �_,_,,.��, t%,,,� -�. - ;,' ., � �, : �-,,, - , ., I 1. I � .1 -
. I - - - . � , I
_,,, -, �- " - " . I . _vfr" , .. . 0 -
� ,_ w , -,,,-, - ". " ," - � . I
I I - -.,- -;,z- -_� - � ,-,-. , ,. ,...
�,- ,- - �V�_ �, ,, , � . -
I .
- � - - .. -, I ,,- - 11
�
. . . , v , -- , � ,_ � , ., - � -, _,j . ,!� .,
,
Apart ••,{ .H304,,� - 1, ,�,,,- � � I-' - '�jl'*21 4
1. I - . , 1 .. I I � 1. . - , ,-,
- ,, ,"'. - , I I .� I -
I � , . , ,-...- I , 4, I ,., �
'� " I" . - - - - -, �,` I L.-.-�'..., . .. � , 1. . �� - I � ;'� -
,Lf. __� 4 _ .
- . I ,
Xmwa:� `-��S2240 - - - - - -, -, -o- "'A'. I -,!,e!- . . ,. . ; � ":, I �- 11. � ", ; .
L 0;;g 1, I z , �P.�,, I I . , ,. � .. � , - �
. � - ,. , , _
- P �,-i I -1 -
-
.._-,: , .. _ 1, - " fAf - � _� ,��,,.. �! � _,� - ,7!� " _., - .i ,�,_ , , �_ _�, - � - , - -,. I , ��
- -� - J%4,Z� . I . . . '. -1 . . I
- �,:, �, q!�� - , -,- ...;.- " -1 �, - . , , - .
, �, � ,;�,. _, , - -
. �, i
: �
., , A -
I,� �,,1-11 - -
* I 'fV di ., , ", -- , -, , - I - . I �� ". ,�. � - . , ,-. I
� , : � - I- I , - � m � �_ ,.� � . , , " . ,_". � �, ._'I �-;_;,�Z,i .'I' -, - ' ,;�- �- , . 4 - . . . I I � r � � � . I
, I I - -�,_,,,, , ,f ., .,- -, ,� ,,� '_ , " _ .:, - I -1 � I - L' .
- - - ,,� - -1 . I . .,,� � . ,., " . " A, . �
. _�I� L .' ' , . .. , � . I .
"I _
_ 1:,,I, I .. fib.
,,,.,�,�. -, ", , ,-,- - , , ,� - .5� .1. ,�, , , ; .,
. - - - �,♦ , - � � . -- , - - -, -,-
, 4 1 ,, ,-,,;- , , - �11 . ��_. ,. . ; .- ,.� �f?,:� �, , I . . , , I - .
. . ,�, - ,a,��t - ,��j . . , � - .
-��.
,.
_. - ,
- ., . I� .. �� -�- I _-
��.- ,� I '.11 � ' - - -
I
,-I,-,-� -�� - � - -, � Z, - at �� ftii-,�, riga],-, � 0 �:_ �11 0 i --,,1974 i';. thd -, Mty�,: CouncU',- ' � 1, I,-:,^ - ,
. , , ,� � X� , ,-, - ,,, �, ,�:3;._, - - - . ,I;_,.�'t - �,, � ,-�, ,. , , � . -... � I., ,�, � ; _� � , "
- � I - , " , - - , - , . �� . �� - ,� �� , � -, ,,�, -I" - iq-" 11 t ',�, -, - e - " `t . . 0 ,__ - . .1 ., .�,. �� - I I _ � � , -
.1, , �_ - � _: ,� _% -, - , , �., , 1, .__ � . . _. . 1. I -1 . I ,11 - . , . I I- .. I .- I . �
- 1. � I . .. �' .44]. 6f7- - - � � _,, �- ,. - - I -
-1 , jV4, I, �� I ,
_., I I ,, -7 � -- . �; , offic addi'Oh 5: Me ..'your? letter cm- I
_ � � I I ZO�?_ , , I . 11 � Y� subsequent
. . , 1, -,
- z L- , � .� .1 I , _ ,.,�. 1, 1. 1,
- I -.,,I_ ", , i __i, , , I ,. 1- . I I
__ :1 . , �, ,�,_ _ ,�_-,� , ilibi� "I-,,-,,. � .11 7 .�- ". �.;._ - - . I � .
'
11 ,I -1 �
" ,� � I � 11 I . � � - - - . - 4 - ��_?;,,,
, ,
- .�_ II. -f. � .1 �, -^� _� xaz � . � ,. I. equenty,letter, coriectii-ig'.
j � � �� k ft -, 4W ii�: ,
- , "
� . ,_ . � I � -1 " �,�,. .►11, .�5�_.1 .,- , - 1, ..;--.;
I - - �
I , I . - � ..., � ,,, -
4.% 11 . . - , .. - - ., . I ,.�
the - �'
�the,.� WqJdan', 4 I had z4lsd',�. be en ,mcedved , by, the � Council 0 � f, , �
. �, , .
- �,. " ". � >>-7{., - - I
, � , , ,_, . L" ,� --,,, , ,-- ,- . I �.
- ,_ P�� ... ,' �, - � '., -- - -,"', , -i�m ,,-,� , . - . I . ,_;,. - 11-1 '�T_
,-� - 111��., . _ � -,- ,. -,x I I. .: , ._�.,� _ , " -
- - ,-'- , _., I �.,, -, � . , "I' -Y I..,.. , fz -,,,�z -,� �,I r ,�:, . _ �; '.,� � - � _.. , I
I- , - , . - .,��,_ " - - -.., --- , ,�f X-- - � � - , I . - . I.:
� i�, , _.., ., �6�:,, ,t , , 11 � I
. - - � - 9. I_� .. 11 I
.�, 1-1 'Ir,fl�, I M ,�",.�� . I - I- ,
� - - ,_, ,%,.�,,.�' ', 'I,?t0,,%7Ko,,-,. �..!. ,,,;�� �, -, - - - . �
,,,�-;� ,�, - - --z,�?M.,-,:e, 51t �`-,w �;.1111�' ', - �,
---M�,.��- Z, �_ff� - J. .� .." , -_ �.-, , - � �
.,,- _-, � , . �_..
� . 1-111. - � - � " � , � . 1. ", .�., � � ".
,., . - - __ . - 1� 'Z- 11 ,, -, 'I," � .1 - 1. , - -
--'.hd6,, b600i,,,drafted�'*obii- ij6ht*,�,to--.GovQrnbr - the
�_. :)��, f .:,
,-..,-A',�letb9r,_ 1. , I
- I . . _ _ - � , . . �
.t- has A- - ,, 4�aj.-, - ,,,;,-,�_"m .. ,
� r,-� i , �_, -1 - I - .
City:
. -r I .�Aw�tlicwstat*.,-;,�
- ;a.il ". �� , �
=400=1=q'i ��Y, trhhbit: � .�, .".
-,� - ,. �
I-„ . - - , .- f� -•� -11� . -
. X�,�� - - _ � .. , .
I.,l. rl,�� ... I 11� , 4� ,, � �
,,,;o� F- f, , ,I , - -, __ - IX.I.--.11� I u -1 - 11 f f,- 1, ; - 1_1 -, ., - I -
_” ' _�..�-_�C�' "r '��� -�'.-.�,4L'�-"I;.:�'l-",,�-1"� �,`A ....... � `,; ,
!, �� -----� , - �j. �,-,. - ,;� �-, -,- , ��;,',tq_ , " , __ � ;'�_ r L '
I I _ - I t;! ,,,,� _' : - . I..
- .�
,1,11�_ Z, I .1. .4.1, ,,� -
,__ -1. 1, - - r. I � �
. Ir 1 4 )� -, � Z _,,!�.�,-,_.,,,.� - � ., , : , �-
- . . I 'i - - I I . � "
. I. . I I . - , 1. I , . � � 0;1. . 1. I - , . , .1 1. I � - I -� 7 ,
". , � ��, ,- -
-, I . the - , . . � � I 1. �
ThaAktirou' f6r'brirAginq.-;�thi ��vAtter-z,to,,,.tha,-'attentiion of e - .1, .. I - ..,
. - � _ I - - . I I. I.% , .
, - �� " - 1� - I-, , , � - ,;,
1� , ,,.�.J�. :,- �, -r - I I I M�.�.
I,i, ,�' - ,
. , - a - . - �, , - . __;
_d�� �,.�-t�-r-'e��-X".,:�'�-', , 4-- - �-:, , ''. V f, , *� � , _
. 4, i.N:i�j��,-���",-.Z�IZ,"�;4�;.;,�-",;;��,�Z4.."�i.�-'*��**- . � .. . :,� q, �� ,,�
�!, .�, I -,� . . ,.. � � _ _
- , , ; -, r •�� - _ , r , - . ,.. .., . �
." ,w ". ��-,_ ,�,�*- , I tea - � - -:
� - - . - �W -., W _ , : P
, ,-_.,,-,
-f __ - �:� -, - Y - - - 1 - .&, , . , � , , _.,4;r
,�,., .- " ,� c , z , ., � , . " , , .I- �'_ , I' � .-I �Iz-;:i6 , ,�,-, 7n,�. , �.��,_ -, -
4��,i,,_rtk*
7, � I ,:,
. I
f
� , ,��!:-&,., ,.:7:g_very,-trul , urs*
,. I
, _-, - "'
- I .z , �, " -7, __," _,'t�� '� - ,�, , - _ ,-
-1 - _ I ��-,- - 5 ,•' V_ �. - - ,Z� ..- . I c',11-1-1.0
''I I , � , --,-I, " ,� 1. , I, -, I.- Y f ,_ ..,
- . - , ��
- - . -,' , v -,� " I I , . , I
� 0, , v, ,;, �Lr, . I , ,_t� X, ,", Y_ _0� - "A .
� . , .''.. I - - _��,� �.,__ I— ,7 �., - - 1. � . I .
- � �; _- I - . I I I
-,, , " , ,�, - 1.-', , I..., - ,_�. I. - I .111f.. --1 - � .. I . . - . I
�_ . 1 11 1- I 11 I I . " � � , . I �
� - �:: . - I ,.-, . . . � . . ''I
- - - - , . 0 . , -,,.. ,4, , --,-z � - .,.- - ,,! �_
� � _- 11 "I - ,� 7 ,- 6 �, �;� �It - �,,,�F., - , 1. ,. * ,
. ,�� , 1- __ " - ",- , ,� - - .1 .1 f,, ." A"': _, .1, -1. 4 - : .1-1 -, 1, N., ,i_ .-."
X,f�! " 4 - - _ 'f" -_� I �'_'� "' �'� - �'I '
. � -
- - - , . -r-,��� "', ,,-
,� ; �,N_, . -, , - ., , . - , - - � , _,� -. _� � . � .,- - �: -11 -:,
- - ,- %; I , , _� !� : -14 --f;, - ,;,, , - , - - �
I - 4 � - .1 �� ;�,:,_ ,,,, � ,*Q&,
, ,�-- � " ", - ,;" - _', . 1� -I -A , , ,I-. � T, - - , - : .
, , ,-r� .,t.,-�, � . - -T�" ��,--�- .., - .. ,
_�7!?�,_ - , I I � ..;. - .11 -, . - , .., . . � c, 1 4- . '.,k., . , .�
. , - � �,4t, -, , ,� . -.1 - ,-�� � - . - ...",
; fc� - ,. , , . . .
-,-- I -- . 11� ,_,,� .1,,,_,_,: I . 1- � ��,,�j,z -- I , " - �
"V " 1. . 1. . , , - . � , . , ..
, . - I - , I- -,
4. , -1 , _,-, , .- I- , -,-.. �i��;, Z,, _-,-r , ,_�_., ,�,- , � -, 11 . - VA.
�,, , � - . , --; �, � �,-:N-- ,�A .1 , _ , , , - - .., . . I . I
-- ,- , - - � - , , , , , ,
� , - - .�.,,.�;�-,�__'��?'I�z'�,�
- , � , � - _- Nl .- - -_ - . . ,�Im-i��-- - -, . ', -
, , � . - ,. , - -� - 11 - ". � - .-�, , ,. - ,L:- "' "
- . - ,4 ,ct . , . , , � .;' _-,,,,� . , , I 11 - ��. ., I �,_ , - � .. -11't - - z . � �- - -j", .
I - I . , 1. - �,r --,.-, ,,�,",..i._
�_ ; - . �4�rl _;,-,-,,, I ", ,!�,�4,-, ---,.��,.,,,_,, K, ,. ,
- � . - � � . . I I - .,. . ,,;.C' .. " � , �
� , , , 1, - . - ,p, , f;. .
.- . I �� , , - I
, . ; �,�.-,,, , ��_ �_ - j- I , . , -_ I"It
- . , 5 ,.. 1, � , ." I -. . � , ,.,- ",,A- ;,,�,�!.%1-1 I I , � �
� , ,,� , " . , - -,: � � ,, . .1� � , Z ��.-, , i , A . - I . - ;�, , , , k-, - -� - I � I � - , .1,
. � fzll _�4i�_ -'.,,- , - .- -,.!, I. - ,�-4, �, � _T- * .
,f, , .. I beAnis , R.�Z, irhft�, � I . ..�.,. . I. -,
. ��,, , "" , , , - _. � r, . � - 1: -; - � F-Z:q�_ - Y,'. � I_. ,,�_ _7, -
. � -1 11 I I .1• .,-11� .� . 1, , ".
- -I �,� .. . - -ill- .Ar,: I - . -1 _. _ - -,.- �, I , , . I , 'I � I,
,,� . - 11, -1, I _'- ;j ..., � .1 I . , , , . - I - - � 1� . - -,
,1, *F I
:�,-�-, �P , ,.�, " 1. � I .
-11 . I .�- f �. ,- . ,,� � 1 4 't. , I �" -
- , � -of", ". I � , _., _ ,
, A I_. . - i�.,A,-�. ,.-.- �,n ,,, ., �,-� r, �, -� . ,.6� � .1 .1,
_;,� - ,, ,�, ', �_ _` ..-,-. , -�,: 47,,�
,. -4. �,�, * - c; _,t��, - ,,- - -j;- .,,--.-.-,. -,,,Xotjjig,Cit*-Mmager - �.. * , ..., _ �:. -_. ,
I ' , � _,� t-, , .' -
, - , 1.1, ,. � '� ., g :4sf� .-,.V.- � � ,.-. , ,- - - , I.,.. I .11. L' . .�_
, ... �t. -..-"Ti .,�, - � - 1 -:0W:-,,�1- " ,---, I , i , ,._'. - -1
��. I I ,,� % �� - - , ��*�� - -v , ��X* -1, � � P '. �, . c. . �:� -�,
- , - - f,,A,.j��,'__', le .1 I. ,_�,4,,� I 1111r," - . ,,,W�,-,--v,-- . :. , z
,- .1. _ �
,e�, ,,I,, ,-- -At I ,�__ - I I . - I!, 1, - - . , �
I :,,Z, ',------ - , q1-. ,,,,, --, . - ",--, �, 11,�,..il
,. ., �!V;,I I � " - 1. - . I
.�, � .,, - . - I � ,,_,. - v,�.,, -, .- , -, . . � , � I
. ,_,� ., .1,1,�...,� �,� , ... � � , - .,q. ,. , - 4, .
. L �� , _ - . , - � ' &- . �,. ,I, 0_:,,� L; ;!�jfr'_,; ,,� ',. ,� � - � - 1. I 'o .11.
- -, .�,, "I , .. � , ,w -, , , � ..f.,,T- .. _ _., � �,l-,".
0 . : �.�,,. .,., I-, -, _��.,..� .."; � ...if , , � ,� ", _-. ��
� I - I- .1 . - - . , ,: . -1 ,. � .. _� ., , "r. I - -1 . � ". - � . I'
T - - ". . _ --11 . , IV - , - ,
- , . - -_,�i�A -�A 'r 3", -,. . .. v , � , �- � , -11�, . . ,
- .� � I - , �., " , -1- 17, � - , �
I . -0 �, � i�W.� � , �, -.: ,�_ ... . . - " ,. ,�
. - ,, ,. V_ . �,�-,V. � - , - 0, , , .
� -� - - = 3 iuw *�-- , - � l�� �; ., ". _ - _� I ".
- � , � .:� --,- A, _� _- ,�7�,j , � 'D V r�n*-D�; �,�,,, �. ,�, - e,L: - ,
-
_ Z L . - - ;r:,i � . ` I' - ,�� .r� i!t�,f��, - .-I . - ,--.. , I "I " ". v_fL_ -
. 1 " .. ,_ - - - I x., . ,-,.. -.,-. _�. - , - . ,
- , ; -,�� -� �,� , , *� '-. ,_ .- -, �j,k�,.,�,- , . . ". � ��, ,_
_�
,�
.,
I , " �, i, ..7i � - . -4 " I V. � � � -,
,. -* 1, � �k�, � ,,, ��, I.- t",- �,- -, _%,.. ".;,.. , - - , � , I _- 'f,. : f. ". . I � ... . .. � Z�, �
, -- -� -- - -- ---- �:,. , , , -, ,,,,, _-, ,�,. ., � �_� I ��, _ - " - L -1 ,-J, I, . , �' 0 .k, -,, . _ �., � .�,-_�,,
��, - , `-�,.. -1 �, �, -..S;f, ". ,_ �, .- .
;;,.. � � - . , .. I-
r, - - �, - 11 -:: ,��Z�, , � -- 7,-v -� "..,-, , �.T,, - . I - -_,,i,, ,
, A ,�y � I -1 .. ,-�;.111. -1. 1. I _ry I . :
.. ..... � - . " I - , " - , - -_- - i, 1 , ,r, -1
. - , - * , - - " , , - 1 , � _
.. `;,-Lz��,� - T� ','7 _$I- ., �j - - - ,,.,�
. ,I I - . . � . I I -1-11
I - -,'§r� " " - - , , -1 1,, '��, ,� , ,. , I , - �
-1 , . ,..�, 1 �,, � .., .11 . .
,� -.� ,;.,,. " �__ 7.','7 77.� I I.-KII, , .- - . - - - � �. I .
. ,, 11. . 4ftll� 11-:1 ,,, . , 11 .. .. "
, - �, �. - - .-i"- .;, - - I --,- -1 --�i-_-i -:- - � .1
��---,�, ', , 4r � , .,. 1, , , .11 ,
� ",I L �' "' -,.I, �
� _, .'�f.l.Z., � '� 1.1-:�,,., -, � L ".-, - 11 � . . ,
,_. . �' .Lf.1 ". , !L , 4 1 �� � � . .,� , . - .. I - I , �, � �, - ', . , , ,. .1 I � :
- . � - - I .. , ,
�--- -, � - . . .
:--', � - - '... .�, �� . , , �,% ,.., I .'L - - - t
��!,ff�� -f�P,�.:� � , � � ,P� . ,. - - .' , , , - I I I - I . . � I - ,�
-_-, � �.--% , . , , ,,_
C,r� , � ".
�, , ,:. ; I � , . , ., . #L�
,� � �;), f, , , ,��-,�- _�t
-
- � k � 4, v,�r,jt �,, ,� ,�;�I;��
- . -1
--
�
_
-
.,. " I �� * , , ,?-.m'.
. , �L , - I I �
11 I ... �� . x . . I - I . ". � c
. , �� , - . 4 I - ., - - j, '..,
-
- , - - , ,
V� " .
n . � . - � . __ ," r , . . - � _11, ", ., �: -, , :�: , - - . ,,-' � - ", Z , �- - - - I I . . I � I I - - I
� �.,�; _. , , . , ., � , � .
- . .1 , -, -- - ,'� . ;', � . , � - .
�; �- -, a_- . , � �. , _ - -1. - � ".4 � -
- . K�-J�-�- 1; . . - - - � ... . "I . ,. .. - �
" - . - � ,
I_rj I , - , . , , , � I - 't , •- , , I . � . - - ., � , .h '� . - .�. - . I I
t , .� � - . . � _ , L ,. ,_,��,'I,,�, 7� -� ,? �, - � �� , , __ � "I . , - ., _-- - � � ,
� .- . , - _� , - __ �.�'
11 I . . - I I . � . .�; , _1j�-
, - � -
I -
_'r
� .
, �, � �,.�L, � - ,,, ,W� I I ,.��
.1. . - . ,. - , �, - W� � I
.11 " �. -., � , � -_�, . - - � - .- . " I
- I - � � � .. _- "-' - .,,." � ��. �.'.. '. �- _' I I . . " -
� ., i _� , , , ,. . . ,� .-
� I � - -'�� ! �.' � � . ' I, ' - 11 � I , I -, I I I _. .,
.. - I - �_ , ,,.,r:, �-,,- - � , , . , ', I . , - � � � I I
14 , , , �,if " �,�V �, '_�' .' -1 -1 � .-i'.' - ; ., - " _� ,. - I - . . � . - - ,-- f�
-, : "' -L' ' _�' ; �I V "' � � - - T, . I : . I - I . . I . i- ,
I - , , . ,, . ,
,,�
-r-.
. - v - .
I , , I., -1
. , � _,� , , v ;, 1. ,1�
, �!, ;� - A - _ , ,a I -, ,.. .r . I �:: , 4. � ,
- � , I ra. _.; . '- � - L_r �,,' '- �� 1. I - .- , ,, , . , - � I I., . I � . I . ,; �
-- '-,,, .,,-- . , 1� - ,., � - �
I ., . , -- , - �
.
�_,
�
�
�
I
I
�
"arant"
�A_O �
1,
-
.:
I
.�
- ;
I
.,:�,
,
,. , - - � ��
" ,��r, - ,4 - - -_,�- -, . � � -.
. � . , ;I ., - �� "', , , I�V, , ,
I �:� "; --z ,_3 ., - �.,- ,-- � �,,-,��,-� , ., ,I i4,,; -, , ..,., . _ .
.� , , ., ;
- . I - I
, - - � I , - I � � - - . � � , .;
- - , - -
I !,--�W',
T.�, � , -, - -..,I.-,--,- . � �. ', �'i;
�� % I . ,-7,0 �, : :,-.' - . . - I �I . - .1 ... - ,-. `� 1,
- . !;:Zj ,., -�, , �- - ., - I 1, � -'-- .1 .I- f, - . � .,. e .
: - I- � � I , - . � 1, � .. ,,- , . . , , , . I . ,�� . __' - ',r' I � , -1
, , , , . - . - " , ,�% � - - � I _- , ., . . . r. , � I
, - �z % �, � - , I ,-' � iS I - -� � � . , I 1� I � _ I I, ` I .1
; - w, - ,-- I - �. 1�
- � ; . �. , I � , 11 I I L"' � � - - I .'-' -,
- � I' , - , * , -, �0,!r, ;�tk� - �,,%- t,� �,.,,,%�� "I �., , �,,� - v�, , % � I , . . � . - - - -
. -1 - . I , �, 4 -v '� -
; ,
- . � � ,
I , :
��!_`� , I I , - -- ";c� -��_ . - I , �. .
,. < .,, , . , � , �;
I - -. , -, � , 'I; ;C, -,.I �,S. -1 �1_1 � � I , , - , .�,- , ,� -, - . _. ,- � I 1� , .� -1 -.1
,f, . - I . , ,� . ��, i, � .��;� ,� L , -., , -, , , � - � ,f � . .7 .
-1 ; , -,',-, , , ?�. ,; , � I- , 1� , � - �- - - . � � - � , . � .
� � � � � . -�, , , .- , .. �, - ,Z - , � .. . , . . .
. - . � I �, - - - � . - , - ��, .,:.t,
�n , �- � � I 11 - _, �,�, 7 , � - :L '-, ,` � __ - �' ' ' t '.�,L � , .' . _ , " ' --
, ;I . - ,�. - . � � - 1. . ,. -, 1-1. " �, . I
�-1 . , -
. - , I - -r.__
,
, � -
_Ii,
11-*- � -
�,-', -., Z_�14 � I t zgj.�-,. , - - ,
, il, I - -� i . . �,_, � , ", � �
` . ,
__ ,I 3, ,-, , � , - ,�, -,,_z �- ,� - �, I , i , - ,� - v - x . -1, - 11 . . I I � . ,, t�. �- - � I � .. �., �
;?Ilnif, `_ , -, � �. ;� �� -j- - � 0,;�,�-��-n-�Ydi, .;.i1rt,_,FI,__If� - - - v 4. 1 - �_,�, � , � .% � . ..,�,."s,.. -1 -
m, _ 1- Lz�,, ]: 4--, .. ;��: .. ., 1 -�_4 4�,;,al .. , - � f;_f,, , _-, __��t - e �z:- - � .. . I-.,.% �, I.. � j,"
- .. � � ,
CHARLES A. BARKER
R. SCOTT BARKER
December 17, 1974
The Honorable Mayor
and City Council
City of Iowa City
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Attention: City Clerk
Re: Approval final plat - Oak Woods 6B
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
AREA CODE 319
TELEPHONE 351-8181
Due to some administrative difficulties with the
legal papers it is necessary for me to request that this
matter be removed from the agenda for your meeting on
December 17, 1974. When the documents are in order, I will
deliver them to the 'City Clerk in final form with signatures
and will, at that time, request that the matter be again
placed on your agenda. Thank you�for your consideration
in this matter.
RSB/km
F
Ve y� truly yours ,
1
Scott Barker
a
arc!
DES MOINES REGIONAL OFFICE
/ P.O. Box 1848 11017 Walnut Street I Phone (515) 245-41411 Des Moines, Iowa 50306
Hayek, Hayek & Hayek, Attorneys
110 East Washington Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Attention:
Dear John:
John W. Hayek
December 10, 1974
RE: Claim No.
Insured:
Claimant:
D/L:
2-270669
City of Iowa City
Lawrence R. Short
1-24-74
This will confirm our phone conversation of November 26th, regarding the
two actions that have been submitted to us for review and possible defense.
I refer specifically to the Civil Action, File No. 74-283-1 in the United
States District Court, Southern District, Central Division and the other
suit, Law No. 42541 in the District Court of Iowa for Johnson County. In
both these cases we face very knotty coverage problems as I mentioned to
you on the phone. Probably the first and most significant problem is that
it is difficult to determine from the two actions exactly what should be
used for date of loss.
The notice and petitions referred to were just received in this office in
November, 1974. Both cases seem to originate from a situation which began
to develop in December of 1965. Because of the late notice and the multitude
of other coverages problems which are involved we will accept these matters
only under a strict reservation of rights, reserving all rights of this Company
relative to the coverage for you in the matter.
The intent of the agreement, of course, is to permit an impartial and full
investigation relating to the said accident and the liability, if any, without
incurring an admission of liability and to preserve without estoppel, waiver
or forfeiture any of the rights to any of the parties hereto. To further
complicate things, we call once again to your attention the fact that you are
only to well aware of, that being that the law suit against the defendants in
both instances are in excess of the applicable limits of the policies involved.
I am sure under the circumstances that you will give consideration to employing
council of your own choosing and this at your own expense, to protect your
interest in the defense of these actions which are over and above the limits of
protection afforded in your policy.
The basic policy HCC9-03907, provides
$100,000 property damage limits, both
aggragate basis. .
for $300,000 bodily injury limits and
on an occurrence basis and both on an
The ESP policy identified as ESP2-505285, provides for a $1,000,000 limit of
4�+Aua't41: ecNiH1Y Yi1�NIN Qi�Hq�hNlar
L
■
-2-
12-10-74
liability per occurrence and also $1,000,000 limit of liability in the
aggregate for each annual period with respects to products hazard and
completed operations hazard, however.
We are referring the files to the Whitfield, Musgrave, Selvy, Kelly and Eddy
firm, here in Des Moines and to the porsonal-attention,of"Attorney Roger Witke.
We are asking that this firm review the petition and then will be in touch with
you as quickly as possible.
Since you have filed an appearance in the action which is filed in Johnson County
and further since you have asked, and have received, an extension in the case
filed in Federal Court here -in Des Moines, we will not actively become engaged
in defense of the case until we review the coverage situation.
Rest assured we will handle this with dispatch and do appreciate your cooper-
ation to date. Should any questions arise, or any other problems are encount-
ered which we are not aware of at this time, I would appreciate hearing from
you, preferrably by telephone.
`. Very truly yours,
'n'
C ;
Morgan
------ Don- Morgan
Regional Claims Manage
--r
DM:dw
cc to HO
cc to Roger Witke 1
cc to Russ Mishak Agency F Q L� in] DEC 1 3 :974
ABBIE STOLFUS
CITY CLERK
STATE OF IONVA
OFFICE OF AUDITOR OF STATE
Des Nfoines
LLOYD R- SMITH
•-:.To2 of srATE
December 17, 1974
Ms. Abbie Stolfus
City Clerk
410 East Washington
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Tis. Stolfus:
Enclosed please find the schedule of the audit of your County,
for the year ending December 31, 1973, which shows the amount of
property tax paid to the various cities and towns of your County.
The complete audit is on file in the Court House and are public
records. If you have any questions or problems concerning audits or
city government, please feel free to contact this office, as we have
a motto to assist as well as audit.
I will be happy t
House.
LRS:cc
Enc.
Cities and Tourns
Coralvi ile
T_o;aa City
Lone Tree
North liberty
Oxford
Solon
Sw=sizer
Tiffin
Gniversity Heights
S"nueyvil le
Total
Corpora--ion_Funds
Receipts and Disbursements - 1973
Treasurer's
balance
Jan .'.. 1973
$ 6,206.04
31.97
Current and
delinquent
taxes
549,294.23
22,167.89
Orders
paid to
Corporations
540,205.50
21,774.65
Balance due
Corporations
Dec 31, 1973
15,294.77
425.21
63,007.19 3,154,098.80 3,1762644.59 40,461.40
242.26
776.84
422.75
113.51
62.21
4S1.90
1,762.47
357.53
$ 73,404.67
103 -
36,540.50
44, 155.52
23,234.54
44,257.42
23,829.11
11,519.08
81,052.23
36,380.20
43,860.24
28,067.71
43,062.02
23,191.09
1.1,425.63
81,940.04
2.656.03 22884.54
3,9972805.35 4,009,436.21
402.56
1,012.12
589.58
1,308.91
700.23
575.35
874.66
129 .02
61,77;.81
CITY ASSESSI•H-INT EXPENSE FUND
1974 1975 -1st Half Total 18 mo's 1975-76
City Assessor
189990
99495
28,485
202000
Deputy Assessor
159200
7,600
22,800
16,110
1st Assistant
13,600
6,800
201400
14,400
2nd Assistant
13,600
61800
20,400
14,400
Clerk
12,400
69200
18,600
139900
Extra Help
4,000
2.000
6,000
4,000
Total Salaries
77 7Q
AR ROG
,,c 5:2
1- ,.,,.
Office Expenditures
Supplies
1,500
500
2,000
29500
Board of Review
39000
39000
6,000
3,600
Car Allowance
500
200
700
500
Exam Board
50
25
75
60
Assessor's School
12000
400
1,400
17200
Court Costs
1,500
500
21000
39600
Telephone
19000
500
19500
19100
Group Life Insurance
29000
19000
39000
2,400
Blue Cross
1,200
600
1 800
2 400,
Total
11,750
6.725
18,475
17,360
Total Budget
89,540
459620
1359160
1009270
'stimated Balance
6 000
5 000
Raised $y Taxation 129,160 95j270
Social Security 41800 21400 71200 61000
IPERS 4,000 2.000 6,000 4,500
Total: Social Security & IPERS
8,800 4,400 13,200 10,500
Tort Liability 19000 500 1,500 1,000
Total Budget 999340 50,520 1499860 1119770
Estimated Balance 6,000 5,000
Raised By Taxation 143,860 106,770
CITY ASSESSOR'S SPECIAL APPRAISAL FUND
i
1974 1975 -1st Half Total 18 mo's
1975-76
Salaries & Extra Help
Supplies & Commercial Appraisers
60,000
10,000
Total
60,000
10,000
�,`stimated Balance
25,000
10 000
Raised By Taxation
35,000
None
Grand Total Of Budget
209,860
121,770
Estimated Balance
31,000
159000
Raised By 'Taxation
1782860
106,770
i
TO:
City
Council
of Iowa City
FROM:
John
Hayek,
City Attorney
RE: Section 23 Housing Proposals
DUM
DATE: December 17, 1974
Upon the request of a member of the Council made at our meeting
of December 16, 1974, I visited with Mr. Nate Ruben and Mr. Bill Van
Vleet of HUD's Des Moines office about certain questions that arose at
yesterday's meeting about the Section 23 proposals, These officials were
most helpful in their responses to the questions asked.
The first question was whether or not we could forward more than
one proposal to HUD for review concurrently with our own review in order
to secure additional time to evaluate proposals, Mr. Ruben and Mr. Van
Vleet expressed considerable reluctance to have that procedure followed.
Principally, I believe their reluctance was based upon a desire not to have
cities and towns in Iowa flood the HUD office with multiple applications for
review. Also, the officials indicated it was HUD's desire in this particular
program to keep federal involvement to a minimum in the selection process.
They emphasized the necessity for the city itself to make the selection.
I indicated that we felt considerable time pressure in properly
reviewing the three proposals that we had received. Mr. Ruben and Mr.
Van Vleet indicated that they would be willing to be flexible on extending
the submission deadlines if that would assist us in our review process.
They suggested that if we need additional time, we should send them a letter
requesting such additional time and implied that the request would be given
favorable consideration.
I also visited with them about the stance of HUD with respect to
negotiating with developers after a tentative selection has been made. They
indicated that they could see the need for negotiating with developers and
recognized that regardless of which developer is selected a certain amount
of adjustment prior to entering into the rental agreement will be necessary.
However, they also pointed out that negotiations which substantially alter
the proposal to the extent that it could be considered to giving unfair advan-
tage to one developer over another would not be proper. Although these
proposals are not submitted as competitive bids as such, we should be
7
City Council of Iowa City - 2 --
sensitive
-sensitive to that issue especially in light of the language of the HUD
regulations cited in a previous memorandum to you.
onHae
JWH:vb
cc: Mr. Dennis Kraft
Mr. Lyle Seydel
Members of Iowa City Housing Commission
Mr. Nate Ruben
■
Kel
FROM:
DATE: December 13, 1974
Fredine Branson, Chairperson, Iowa City Housing Commission
John Hayek, City Attorney
RE: Section 23, Housing Assistance Payments Program
This memorandum is to confirm the content of our telephone
conversation of December 13, 1974, reference questions that have arisen
over the proposals submitted to the City for the Section 23 Housing Program.
Specifically, you asked the question as to air conditioning of the units
proposed by.the Knutson Company. It is my understanding that the Knutson
proposal does not include air conditioning for the apartment units themselves.
You also asked whether or not Old Capitol Associates could revise the floor
plan of their apartment units.
I indicated to you that in my opinion HUD regulations require that the
City consider and evaluate the proposals as submitted without alteration of
any substance. Paragraph 2-11(b) of the HUD Section 23 Handbook (7431. 1)
states, "For purposes of determination of acceptability, no changes in
proposals shall be considered after the deadline date for receipt of proposals,
except that the LHA may request clarification of individual items or additional
information which does not alter the scope of the proposal. " Because of this
regulation I believe that the City should evaluate the proposals as they actually
were submitted.
I understand .that Knutson has given the Commission a letter in writing
indicating a willingness to supply air conditioning and also that Old Capitol
has indicated a willingness to revise their floor plans. While certainly the
willingness of the developers to remain flexible and provide needed facilities
is laudable, it does seem to me that the official evaluation should take place
on the basis of the actual proposals as already submitted. It may be that HUD
would permit some further negotiation with a developer after that developer's
proposal has been tentatively approved and accepted by the City and by HUD.
The extent of our freedom to operate in that area would depend on HUD.
o n ye
JWH:vb
cc: Members of the City Council
Lyle Seydel, Housing Coordinator
IF
L E
DEC 1 3 174
ABBIE STOLFUzz),
CITY CLERK