HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-06-26 Bd Comm minutesgqg
MINUTES
Iowa City CATV Committee
• June 12, 1973
MEMBERS PRESENT: Blum, Ehninger, Eskin, Hubbard, Russell,
and Welsh
MEMBERS ABSENT Cordier, Kril, and Prediger
Stan Rosenstein was also present.
Rev. Welsh called the meeting to order at 7:40 P.M.
Thero os
ed a
P P Benda for the meeting.
was as
follows.
1. Approval of the June 5, 1973 minutes'
2.' PublicY! discussion
3.Report ,from Cable' Television Information Center
4. Unfinished Business
5 Ordinance Provisions
r.
Dick Blum motioned, seconded by Flo Beth Ehninger that the
June 5, 1973 minutes be accepted with the following ammend
ment: 'That, the last 'sentence of the fifth, paragraph on page
four "Attached to the minutes are copies of, the determination
made at the meeting." be eliminated. The motion carried.
Dick Blum suggested that the 'Ordinance Provisions be submitted
to the committee members only as 'a ;working document.
Rev. Welsh then called for public discussion. :There was a
member of the Iowa State Education Association Task Force
on 'Cable Television present'.' She participated in discussion
with Red. Welsh, and other members of the committee concerning
the Des,Moines Cable:Televison Ordinance, the rights', of the
public with'a Cable Television Franchise,' and the avenues of
investigation taken by the ISEA Task Force on Cable Televi
sion. The ISEA representative informed Dave Russell that the
ISEA would have documented materials on their various studies
on'Cable 'Television completed b the 'end of June available
ilable
upon request.. _
There was committee discussion concerning travel arrangements
for several; of the committee m
• embers to attend the Cable
Television Workshop in Des Moines June 14 and 15. It was
stated that the City would 'cover travel costs.
There then followed lenghty„discussion on the reliability
of figures provided by the computer,run by the Cable
Television Information tion Ce
nter.
Iowa City CATV Committee
June 12; 19 7.3
Page 2
• Dick Blum expressed a distrust of the computer figures. He
felt that the medianiincome;figure was askewed by extremes
at the top and the bottom of the, income range. Blum also
expressed a belief that the
than can penetration factorsaremuch higher
be expected; therefore, {the end result, figures are
not realistic.
Bill Hubbard also stated that he distrusted the figures.
Rev. Welsh then quoted the following projected penetration
percentages, based upon the fact that 6081 of the system
would be installed 'during the first year and the entire
system installed at the end of the second; year: YEAR PENETRATION YEAR
PENETRATION
12.9 9 61.9
2 145.6
3 47-9 11 10 64.1
4 50 _66.2
.`3
5 52.6 12 67.7
6 55:0 13 69.3
7 57.3 14 70.7
8 59.6 15 72.1
The committee felt that it should
'determine the percentages
and othervariables to be fed to the computer. It was t
general consensushe
of
the committee ettee that the following vari-
ables'
be used 4
n the next computer run:
1." Penetration of 358 and 408 at year two.
2.Color. set penetration Of 51% and 56%.
3. Inclusion of'University lHeights.
4. Inclusion of'Coralville.
Several members of the committee recognized the bargaining
Position held by the University as to regulations on Cable
Television on University property. P P y. Sand El
that the committee work with someone from theUniversity.
There was some discussion concerning the extension of service
• as outlined in the Ordinance Provisions. Rev. ,Welsh stated'
that Coralville would be interested in Cable Television only
if it was an underground system.'
MINUTES
Iowa City Charter Committee
• June 5,'1973
MEMBERS PRESENT: Meardon, Cain, DeCounter,'Baldus,
Corrigan, Ringgenberg,,Knight
MEMBERS ABSENT: Welt, Davidsen
STAFF PRESENT: Rosenstein
Chaiman Meardon called the meetin
g to order at 8:00 p.m.
Mr. Meardon stated that he discussed with the City Council the
process*ok submitting the Charter and requested a meeting; between
the City Council and the Charter Committee for''the presentation.
He; stated, that he made it clear that the purpose of the meeting
was not to negotiate on the Charter, but, rather to discuss back and
forth the thinking that went into the proposal. Mr. 'Meardon 'stated
that the meeting, was scheduled for 4:00 p.m. Wednesday,, June 13,
1973 and, that the Charter Committee should meet', today and tomorrow
to finalize the Charter, and then ,present 'it to Council so they, can
review it in detail before the June 13 meeting. He further stated.
that the Committee should present a copy to the City Attorney to see
if he felt there'were,any legal 'problems lwith the Charter. Mr.
Meardon continued, stating that after the meeting with the City Council
the Committee should formally present the Charter to Council. Mr.
Meardon concluded that he has discussed with the City; Council Chapter
49.11 of the Code of Iowa which provides that when precincts ,are
changed 'there must be three 'weeks of publication and then a thirty
day period before the election, but that,.this_did not'have anything
to, do with the Charter Committee because if the Committee finishes
the Charter and submits it, to the City Council, it then becomes
City Council's; choice as to when the Charter is submitted to the
voters. Mr. Bal'dus stated that the Committee would not be able to
get- the legal opinion from Mr. Martineau until Monday, June 11 1973
and that the Charter should not be 'submitted to
the City Council
before that time. Mr.' Baldus continued that he did not ywant sto get'
another 'legal,opinion on the 'Charter before the Charter consultant's
. opinion, was in. Mr. Meardon stated that; it would not be fair, to the
City Council to have them come to the meeting without having been able
to study ',the Charter. Mr. Meardon stated that he has talked"with ,the
City Attorney several 'times and there have been no legal objections
voiced yet." Mr. Meardon stated that it was important to get something
to
Council il,as soon asP ossible.
I
page 2
Charter, Minutes
June 5, 1973
•Mr. ,Ringgenberg'stated that at theCitizens for a Better Iowa City
meeting the group expressed concern about initiative and referendum.
Mr.`Meardon responded that a lot of the concern -about the processes
was because people 'do not understandthem. Mrs.` Cain' stated she
has talked with people who were.concerned about.the processes
who understand' them.
The Committee next went over ':the draft of the Charter in detail
making numerous minor changes.
Mr. Corrigan moved that the phase "and chief executive officer"
be removed from the section on the Mayor. Mrs.' Cain 'seconded
and the ''Committee agreed to the change.
The Committee agreedlthat it would not be necessary: to 'list the
powers ofsthe 'Mayor protem because they would be the :same as the
Mayor's when the Mayor is absent.
Mrs. Cain 'moved 'to delete Section 4.03 which provided methods of
appointing theracting City Manager.:, Mr.'Ringgenberg',seconded and;
the motion carried six for..and two against with "Mea
Meardonand Knight
voting against. Mr.'Baldus moved that Section 4.03, Absence;
disability,of City Manager read, "to perform his or her duties
during a,temporary .absence or disability, the City Manager may
designate a qualified City employee as :acting City Manager. If
t-he`'„City Manager fails to make such designation, the Council may
appoint a qualified City employee,to perform the duties of the
City Manager until he or she returns.” Mr. Ringgenberg seconded
and'Ithe motion carried'six for and two against'w,ith Meardon and
Knight voting g against.' Discussion was next held on the Article
on 'initiative and referendum.
Mrs;. Cain stated that the declaration of 'power should say that the
qualified voters.have the process of initiative'and referendum since
they are the ones who will be voting on the questions.
Mrs. Cain moved to eliminate the allowance of initiative that repeals
ordinances. Mr.' Ringgenberg'seconded. Mrs. Cain stated that if the
Committee wanted negative'initiative; it should just remove 'the ,time
limit on when a referendum petition could be filed, thus adhering to
the traditional legal interpretation that' initiative is'a positive''
•' proposal and referendum is a proposal to repeal. Mr. Baldus stated
that part of the concept of ',referendum was that it was a prompt 'vote
on the subject. He further stated that allowing initiative to
repeal eliminates litigation on whether a substitute law is 'a repealing
law. Mr. Meardon stated 'that removing initiative that repeals an
ordinance would kill the use of initiative because it would be unusual
page 3
Charter Minutes
June 5, 1973
to have an initiative which does not in effect repeal something.
• Mr. Baldus stated that'he would accept the idea of not having an
initiative with the purpose to repeal an 'ordinance if the time limit
on referendum was removed and if there coul& be.a referendum on a:
whole or a part of anlordinance. The question was called and the motion
passed,four for 'and 'three againstwith Cain,' Corrigan, Ringgenberg,
and Baldus voting for, and Knight, Meardon, and DeCounter'voting
against. The Committee agreed to drop, the limit for filing a
- referendum petition and to allow referendum to seek repeal of an
ordinance in whole or:in part.
Discussion was Next held on what could be subject to initiative and
referendum. Mr. Corrigan stated that if;,zoning was allowed to be
subject to referendum much of the Charter's:support.would be lost.
Mr. Baldus stated that zoning law traditionally has.been allowed as a
subject for referendum. Mr. 'Baldus further stated ;that if a.Council
can't sell its positions to the public and gain support for ',them,
then the; Council should re=evaluate their decisions. 'Mr. Baldus
moved that the,
following definition of,what' is subject to initiative
and referendum be adopted. "Within thislarticle, 'ordinance' means
all measures of.a legislative nature, however 'designated, which (a)
are of a permanent rather than temporary character and (b),include 'a
proposition enacting,`,amending,.or repealing a new or existing law,
policy or plan, ;as opposed to one providing for the execution of
a ',law,, policy or plan already enacted by,Council." .Mr. Corrigan
seconded. Mr. Rosenstein stated 'that :this was an extremely broad
definition, especially with the inclusion of the word "amending."
He stated that this would make a project subject to numerous
referendums because most projects arer,amended many times. 1Mr. Baldus
stated' that nothing in the Charter except for initiative and referendum
deals with the responsiveness of government.'' The question was called
and the motion carried five for,: none against and two',abstaining,'
Knight and Ringgenberg.
Mrs. Cain moved 'that'Section 8.02, Charter Review Commission read that
_ the Council may's,ubmit recommended amendments of the Charter Review
Commission'to.the voters, rather than, requiring ,the Council'' to submit"
them.Mr.'DeCounter seconded, Mr. 'Rosenstein 'stated 'that it was
important to periodically review a. Charter' because traditionally..',
Charters are amended in a piecemeal fashion. Mr'. Baldus stated that
a Charter Review Commission, should, be legally independent' from Council..
The question was called and the motion was defeated one for and ,five
against, with Mrs. Cain voting for and Mr. Corrigan being absent.
MINUTES
IOWA CITY CHARTER COMMITTEE
JUNE 7, ,1973
MP.MBERS PRESENT: Meardon, Baldus, Knight, Ringgenberg, DCCounter.,
Cain.
MEMBERS ABSENT:Corrigan', Davidsen, Welt
STAFF PRESENT: Rosenstein!-
'The Committee went through Article VII, Initiative and Referendum
in detail making the necessary grammatical chances.
Discussion was held on whether to prohibit a Council from passing
an ordinance after it is repealed by a referendum election. Presently
the Charter prohibits ,the Council from doing so for two years after
defeat of the ordinance. Mrs. Cainlstated.that 'this prohibition
should not be in the Charter,, because a Council may be forward thinking
and this provision could hinder progressive action by, the City.
She further stated that poIitically',it'would be ''difficult for a Council
to ignore '.the negative outcome of a'referendum,'but if the 'Council
feels strongly enough about an issue and wants,to take the risks of
passing it again, they should'have this option. -;Mr. Baldus stated
'that- this article has gone to'reat`trouble t
4 o4
revent aures
from
p
being played, and this 'provision prevents the Council from playing
games. Mr. Baldus stated that if a'Council felt 'an issue important;
it could put it up to a vote of .the people and.then,try to sell the
issue. Mr. B'aldus'further 'stated that recent history has shown
that when the Parking Ramp was voted down in a':referendum the.Council
went ahead with it anyway. Mrs. 'Cain moved that the
provision
prohibited a P ion ere
Council from passing an ordinance defeated in a,referendum
for, two years be deleted from the Charter. Mr. Ringgenberg seconded,
and the Committee tied on the motion' to delete three to three with
Cain, Ringgenberg, and DeCounter votina,for and Meardon, Baldus, and
Knight voting against._ The Chairman ruled that this provisionwould
remain in the Charter for the time being since there was a tie on the
motion to delete.'
Mr. Baldus moved that all of Article VII be adopted as written! Mr.
Knight seconded. Mr. Ringgenberg stated that he was, concerned''about
the definition of ordinance since it was broad and covered so many
things. Mr. Ringgenberg stated that there should be:a limitpplaced on
ordinance so, its meaning was the same as State law's. Mr. Baldus
stated that the Charter would be worse off if it rel ed on
'., Y the ;Codes
definition of ordinance, since it was a law of a; general or permanent
,• nature, and the Courts would end up formulating what that means, Mr.
Ringgenberg stated that ordinance under Iowa law would not include an
plan. Mr. Meardon stated that it was important to include the coverage
of policies and plans. Mr. Rosenstein stated that the inclusion of
amendments to policies or plans would mean that most projects would
be subject to referendum six or seven times',since most projects are
• '' • � is v
-2-
amended that often. Mr. Baldus stated that only the amendment, and
not the whole policy or plan, would be, subject to a referendum.
Mr. Meardon stated that if someone showed him something that would
create problems unless it was • excluded, he would be for excluding it from referendum.'- Mr. Meardon stated that he has grave feelings
about protecting the people from themselves. Mr. Meardon stated that
a vote for this motion would be afirmlcommittment to''Initiative and
Referendum, although some sections might still change. The question
was called and the motion' passed four for, none against, and one
abstention, with Mr.' Ringginberg abstaining. Mr. Riggenberg.;st'ated
he favored initiativeandreferendum but opposed this version:,',
The Chairman called a meeting, for Monday night June 11, 1973 at
8:30. This 'meeting was scheduled for approval of the Tentative
Draft. The Chairman and Mr.:I Rosenstein'. will distribute the tentative
draft to'the -City -Council, City Manager,' City Attorney, and City
Clerk on June 8,'1973.
The 'minutes of May 23;26,29,30, and June.2, 1973, were approved,as
corrected. These minutes are to be submitted to Council on Friday,
June '8,',1973.
Mr. Baldus moved the final adoption of the map dividing the City
into, precincts and Council districts„as'corrected, 'and .,the submission
of ,this Map to ,Council along with, but separate ,from, 'the Charter
Mr. DeCounter seconded and the motion carried unanimously. (Mrs'.
Cain was absent at this: time.) Several” minor. corrections were made
to Articles I`through VI.- Mr. Baldus moved that Section 8.02 ',allow
the Charter Review Commission to decide in what formthe amendments
should be submitted. Mr. DeCounter seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
The meeting was adjourned.
•
s
�
IOWA CITY HOUSING COMMISSION
MINUTES
•
June 6, 1973
MEMBERS
PRESENT: Litton, White, Bosserman, Hamer
MEMBERS
ABSENT: Frimml, Duncan, Mikelson
STAFF PRESENT: Seydel, Schierbrock
1. The
i
meeting was called to order by Vice -Chairperson Litton.
The
minutes of the previous meeting were approved as writ-
ten;
motion was made by White, Bosserman seconded and
the
motion,passed with all in favor.;
2: 'Coordinator's Report
a.
At the present time, there are 3 leases empty and 3
',theend of 'the
subleases empty that will be filled by ,
of 1-1 bedroom 'and
month. The open subleases consist
2 -2 b edroom.units. Also,there have been 2 abandon -
ments included in the above figures.
One of the tenants, in an ''attempt to make the unit look
-
s rease
clean and fresh; painted';over dirt, Pots grease
and sealed lshut 'window sashes,,besides using, improper
paint.'' Improper, pain ting caused damage to the unit
and re-
making it necessary to strip the entire unit
photographs',for all types
paint.' White suggested using
Seydel responded that photos have
of inspections.
been used in the past but many items do not show up on ,
the photograph.
Litton asked, who is expected and responsible for inter-
ior>!painting? Seydel responded that ,the lease states
that tenants shall do no painting without the permis-
tenant
sion of the owner. In, the above situation, the
Litton suggested that per-
did not receive permission.
the Commissioners should review the lease, to
haps
possibly improve, tenant -landlord relations. White agreed.
-landlord relations
•
Bosserman thought the problem of tenant
the enforcement of the terms, of the lease.
was based on
She suggested the use of';ref erences on the applications.
Seydel pointed out that the people should be given a
chance to prove 'their treatment to units rather than
rely on ,references. Litton agreed. It was the consensus
review the effectiveness
of the Commissioners, however," to
of ,the lease terms used by the LHP.
I f
�.
2-
i
present there are 10 new applications that
B. -At thep '
need Commission approval. Seydel gave'a report on the
application waiting'
list: (approximate)
# Applications Unit Size
• 31 1 bedroom
29 2 bedroom
3 3 bedroom
4 4 bedroom
Many of these applications are close to a year old,
but ;'each 'will be contacted in regard to openings in
the program.
C. Newspaper Articles-- Daily Iowan 6-4-73
PAT: :Book Will Answer Questions About Landlord -Tenant
Confilcts, to be published in mid-August., The Commission'
will request a copy. --Times-Democrat 6-5-73
Meyers Unveils 'Plan for,Elderly Housing. Clippings'
are on file at the Leased Housing office.
3. Old Business
A. Letter to Progressive Housing will be.studied and sug-
gestions given at next meeting. The; Commissioners
questioned the progress of the Special Use Permits for
the required rezoning of<the proposed housing forthe
elderly, site.
'B. Election of Officers -- Chairperson elected was Jack
B. 'White; motion made by,`Bosserman- with 'Hamer seconding ;
and carried with all in favor.' Vice -Chairperson _ elected
was Helen Hamer;motion from Bosserman, White seconded
the 'motion. Motion' carried' with all in favor.
Chairperson White now presiding.
4.
New Business
A.' A joint meeting with the City Council's to discuss the
ordinance
will ,be attempted
proposed Tenant -Lan
during a noon work session. The Commissioners will
be notified concerning time and date.`
B. White suggested the Agenda order be'changedlto benefit
those people who wish to bring something before the
Commission. It would,possibly:be more encouraging for
ems to the Commission.
people to bring it
• C. Due to a schedule conflict, Duncan had to resign as
representative on the JCRP Housing Committee. Hamer
accepted as his replacement.
D. Litton reminded the Commissioners of unfinished business
concerning the selected subcommittee for,,investigating
the housing:problems of Iowa City.
E. The Commissioners discussed
ways to add `,financial
acquire larger sized
support to the LHP in order to
four bedroom units that
units. Presently, three and
financially feasible for the program are at lied
supp
are
premium. Litton suggested
that.'if the City
costs„ the money left
• funding for the administrative
HUD appropriations
would provide funds for
from the
Seydel-answered
that it was possible
program expansion.,'
from HUD standpoint.
F. Chairperson White reminded
Commissioners of the next
1973. The meeting
meeting to be held on June
20,
was 'adjourned.
APPROV
�. 1.
Ja k''B. White, Chairman
•
/''i ERNMENTS • •
0 o
REGIONAL ,PLANNMG .COWISSION
0
I /
2
�i -855
C
S ` IOWA QTY IOWA 52240 - 315 351
22X SOUTH DUBUQUE STREET I )
i
MINUTES
Special Meetinfor
.
'
Regional Planning Commission
May 2, 1973 7:30 P.M.
Kirkwood Elementary_ School,
Coralville, Iowa
Members Present: Jacobs, Vestal,, Madsen, ,Dole,,White, :Wells' Connell,
Czarnecki, S oemaker,Kattchee, Bellamy,! Bartel, 'Patrick, ;Dane,
Gibson, Smith, Knowler,IKoser, Zaiser, Davidsen`
Members Absent:, Brandt, WaLl,.Cilek, Goetz,.Sheets, Small,.;i•lashaw,
Staab,,. Hill, Salton ,Kirchner; YeggyWieland;Ulmstead, Cisar, 'Nalley,
,
ReyhonsGardner !" i
Others Present:) Michael Bonfiglio, Alan l4idiss,Pran Bullard,
CaroliaerL'mbreeg-Dennis Kraft'% Richard ).uMeyer',,Dennis.Saeugling
Staff Present: 'Robert Hilgenberg Barry Hokanson, Phil McGuire
�tic]iael Kattchee,`Chairperson, called the, special meeting to'order.
D1r.lKattcheelreported that•,theipurpose of the.;special,meeting was o
continue discussion of the Metropolitan Landl,Use Plan,.which.is. a
;por,tioniof the.Area-:Transportation Study.
Mr. Hokanson.presented four, proposed:motionsl, for consideration by
the Commission', dealing with procedural steps available for approving
the:planas a !!preliminary-plan" and,. concurrently; ref erring, the, plan
and related matters to various committees for futher study. He
described a flow chart pertaining, to the relationship between metro-
politanand;non=metropolitan portions of: a county-wide,la.nd.use plan.
He explained, that the metropolitan plan, as developed in conjunction
i-rith committees, was,characterized,by four major features:
1.` The land needs were basecl on realistic estimates of
population growth:,
l 2 The concept of efficiency in land use patterns and acti-
vity centers was stressed.
• 3. The plan recognizes, the presont'rcentral focus of the
urban' area, and proposes to preserve''and complement that
focus by discouraging unnecessary peripheral development.
4:` The plan emphasizes contiguous !urban growth as opposecl
to scattered' development.
ldr,. White said 'he felt .that the purpose of the. land use plan is to
providcra,spatial distributionof ,the .pr,esent,and future activities of
the urban area. He ;said the assumption. is I that the plan i's `most',effi-
cient and. best ',serves the, metropolitan area if `it is not ,spread out,
and does, not use more land than., is necessary. ,This was the basic''Lssump,..`,..
tion underlying the Policy Commi.t;tee's proposal not to include the
• most distant part of the Coralville area. tie said that if,a,compromise
;;as possible, one that -:does not have significant transpotation impli-
cations and can allow the Commission to move along with, tile transporta-
tion plan, pending the land use committee reviell, he felt it would be
important that such a document be accepted and: continued to :be worked
on after,',preli:minary adoption. It was Mr. White's further suggestion
that the Policy and Technical Committees: meet with the Coralwille City
Council and Planning and Zoning: Comm issi.on prior tothe next regular
meeting 'of the Commission in order to work out a workable compromise,
and presentedito the Commission on May 16th.'
Mr. Wells noted that since the members of t}ie Commission should sub-
sequently adopt the plan, ,there should be reasonable land.uses pro-
posed by the member bodies. Mr. Kattchee noted that the present zoning
in:the rCoralville section was annexed as such.
`dr.Richard Meyer, a member ,of the,Coralville'City Council, requested
information as to the affects or the present boundary line and -the
resulting federal funding for;,pirojeets,,outside the boundary:
a elide land,
use. plan in 'rocess is,
Dr. Eonfioliof noted that there. is a county 1?- -P
and those areas outside the proposed boundaries sliould be covered by
the county plan, and,thus would not be prohibited from federal funding.
Caroline Embree, representing the Citizens' Advisory' Committee of the
Transportation .Study, ',said 'she felt that the existing zoning pattern in
Coralville could be improved upon, and that the present sewer and
utility. l services and ;general development are costly because of the
, en discourages sound develop-
lielter-scelterand in the ru
mens.
Mr. White' noted that the origin of the problem was in a past period
when Coralville and Iowa city city councils were not communicating
effectively and annex,ations:,were made,luirriddly and zoning was not
always ltaken into ,consideration. , Ms. Embree, noted that Cgr.alville
should make every,attempt to rectify the problem and rezone the 'lands
!in ,question.
idr. Y}idiss, representing the Citizens' Advisory Committee for the
Transportation Study, noted that the Commission is in an excellent
;position to control future development in the metropol.itanarea; dis-
coiirage inefficient development patterns,,tighten present zoning
• regulations, and be aware of future gas shortages which will directly
affect the community and its transportation system in a long-range plan:
?!s: Dole moved that the Commission adopt Motion 81 as suggested by the
staff.' Mr. Kattchee noted that 'tile ,commission may not want to vote on
any of the proposed motions, at this meeting. The motion dies for lack
of:'second. Mr. Kattchee suggested the Commission direct 'the Istiff to
schedule 'la meeting with the Coralville City Council and Planning and
Zoning Commission with the Policy and Technical Committees prior to the
May 16th Commission meeting, in order that a compromise can be met on
4,110 present Coralville situation.
I
/. �R,SMENTS
C0.
Zi
REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIOI\11'
V
0
,YSO', GQJ= 22X SOUTH DUBUQUE srnccT IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (3191 351.0556
MINUTES
Special.Meeting
,
Regional Planning Commission
May 2,'1973 7:30 P.M.
Kirkwood Elementary School
Coralville Iowa
Members Present: Jacobs, Vestal, Madsen, Dole: White, .Wells', Connell,
Czarnecki, oemaker; Kattchee, Bellamy,, Bartel,Tatrick, Dane,
Gibson, Smith, Knowler, Koser, Zaiser, Davidsen
Members Absent: Brandt, hall, Cilek, Goetz ,•Sheets,,-- Small ,.'Mashaw,
Staab, Aiill, Saxton, ,.Kirchner, Yeggy,.Wieland,,,Ulmstead, Cisar,;Nalley,
Reyhons Gardner.is
Others Present: Michael Bonfiglio, Alan',Widiss; Fran Bullard,
Carolinc;Em ree,.'Dennis Kraft, Richard .Er. Meyer,.Dennis Saeugling
Staff Present: Robert Iiilgenberg,,Barry, Ilokanson, Phil McGuire
)lichael Kattchee, Chairperson !!called the special meeting to order.
Mr. Kattchee'reported that thelpurpose of the special.meeting,was to
continue. discussion of the::Metropolitan Land, Use Plan,,which,is;,a
portion of the Area Transportation Study.
Ir. liokanson presented four proposed motions; for consideration by
the Commission, dealing with: procedural steps available for approving
the plan as a'"preliminar'y plan" and concurrently referring theplan
and related matters ';to.various,committees for futher study;, Fie
ed a
low
pertaining to
ationship
lesexplainedrthatcthetmetropolitan plane asldeveloped intween conjunctio-
poli,tan and non -metropolitan portions of a county -wide land use plan.
p tion
with. committees, was characterized by four major features:
1. The land needs.were based on realistic estimates of
population 'growth.
2. The concept of efficiency in land use patterns and acti-
vity centers was stressed.
• 3. The,plan recognizes the, present central focus of the
urban area, and proposes to preserve, and complement that
focus by discouraging unnecessary peripheral development.:
4. The plan emphasizes contiguous urban' growth a.s opposed
to scattered development.
i
-2- ---;i
Nlr. Hgkanson explained the committee action on the plan, indicating
that there was general conc'urrance;, during the 'Policy, 'Technical,
aid—Citizens' Committees about "the; proposals:ofithe..plan. ',Fiersaiil:'.'
I the Citiicns' Committee preferred alternative uses along pighway fid
f near the Airport, specifically "research and office uses" with a
holding arca at the southeast quadrant of the interchange'vith,pioposed
Freeway 515. He presented maps of the Co'ialvi:lle area, describing
i the alternatives shown by present zoning districts, the earlier i
1 Coralville General Plan (1701' plan), and a compromise previously
discussed with the Coralville City Council and the Coralville Planning 'r
and Zoning Commission He discussed the concept of the black line
` i,�hich indicates theproposed limit of urban development for the,plan-
ning period, to the year 1995.
Ile 'said the primary concern of the Coralyille representatives was the
fact that the black: line (limit of urbandevelopment) did not encompass
i
All the municipal territory, of Coralville. -Mr. Hokanson added that two
I a're'as'within `Iowa Cityy werel proposed for ,the'same- designation with a
I clashed line to,' indicate "urban reserve" or an'area Vor further study.
Mr. Kattchee stated that the map showing,,''compromise" in the Coralville
'porntion was in'SAN,,compromise among e_
the. CoralvillCity.Council ,and
fl Planing,'and Zoning Commission. Te, said thorpreferred that,tli°e black
line encircle the whole Coralville area as well as,those now excluded
parts of Iowa 'City.
Mr,i Vestal stated•that perhaps'thle Coralville City-Council,mistakenly
j annexed portions of Coralville, and thaQthe Commission does not have
to"accept those.mistakes;'and'that this may welllbe true of portions
however, ifythe}lblackelinle istlextended5etheeCommissionreouot absolute,
of,..Iowa Cit
t� ld need to
consider the proper zoning of n these& areas now excludef from the present '
iplan. Mr. Vestal noted that if the'noithwest area�of-Coralville were
included in, the plan,'!, -the land uses there have.to be:fuhher; cons idered.
He added that the City Council in'Coralvillelcan legally,ehange:.the
zoning, "since landowner has no vested right in the zoninf as long as
i the 'land has 'not 'yet .been used for -the zoned purpose.
Mr Aellamy stated that unless the plan;'does incorporate the total
Coralville area, it will have no value to the City of Coralville.
Dr; Bihfiglio, Chairman of 'the Transportation Policy Committee, said
r; lie felt the purpose of the Land Use Plan is mostly i.n';relationship;to
the Transportation Stidykand may not necessarily preclude land uses
outside the proposed development limit line. He said the transportation
study';is designed to recognize and reflect those areas within the urban
complex that are the largest traffic generators.
Mr. Bartel questioned ;what ,delays 'would be Involved if future uses
of the Coralville area were included in the study. Mr. Ilokahson state'
thni the Iowa Highway Commission has had!the data based on the present
p1nn's:ince Jure 1972, and that any major change in the plan may require
delay in the transportation plan.
` i
Ir. White saidfpurpose
he clt: hat the
of the land use lam is
..P to "
pr.ovidei;a spatial distribution of the present. and future activitics of
the ,urban area lie said the assumption ,is that the plan is most'e£fi-
tient and best serves the metropolitan area if 'it is not spi•ecd out,
and does, not ,use more land ;than is necessary., This was thc.basic assump-
tion underlying the Policy Committee's proposal not to include the
most distant part of' the Coralville area.: Ile said that if a compromise
i• Jcas possible, one that does not have significant transpotation :impli-
cations and can allow the Commission to move along with the transports -
tion plan, pending the ].incl use committee review, lie 'felt it would be
important that such a document be accepted and,continued'.to be worked
on-after:pre.liminary adoption. -It: was Mr. White's further suggestion
that the, Policy and Technical Committees meet with ,the Coralville'-City
Council and Planning and;Zoning Commission prior to the next regular
meeting of the Commission in order to work out :a workable compromise,
and presented to the Commission on May 16th.
Mr. Wells noted that sincethemembers of the Commission should sub-
sequently-adopt,,the plan, there should be reasonable land uses pro-
posed by the member, boMr rKattchee noted "that the present 'zoning
in the! Coralville section was annexed as such.
Mr. Richard Meyer, a member.of the Cor,l ille.City Council,'` requested
information as to the'! affectsof the,;present boundary, line and :the
resulting federal funding for projects outside the ,boundary,
Dr". Bonfiglio noted that,there is a county-udde'land 'use . plan in 'process;)
and those areas outside the proposed boundaries should be covered, by
the countyplan,. and thus would not be prohibited from federal funding.
Caroline Bmbree, representing the Citizens' Advisory', Committeeof the
Transportation Study,, said she felt that the existing zoning pattern in
Coralville could be improv,ed,.upon,;and that the present sewer and
utility services and general development are costly because of!'the
lielter-scelter zoning; and in the long run discourages sound develop-
ment.
Mr. White noted that the origin of the problem was in a past period
when Coralville and rlowa City, city,, councils were not 'commun' icating
effectively, and annexations were made hurriedly and zoning: was not
always taken into consideration. Ms. Embree,,noted that Coralville
should make every attempt to rectify the problem and 'rezone the lands
in question.
Mr. Widiss, representing the Citizens' Advisory Committee for the
Transportation Study, noted that the. Commission is in in excellent
uosition to control future development in the metropolitan area; di
inefficient development patterns, tighten present zoning
• regulations, and be aware of future gas,, shortages wh cli will directly
affect the community ;and, its ,transportation system in a long-range plan.
Ms. Dole moved that the Commission' adopt' Motion #I as suggested by the
staff'. Mr. Kattchee noted that the Commission may not want'to -vote on
any of the proposed' motions at this meeting. The motioal'dies f:or'lack
of second. Mr. Kattchee-suggested the Commission di.rectIthe' staff to,
schedule a meeting with the Coralville City Council ,and Planning and
Zoning Commission with the. Policy',;ind Technical, Committees' prior to the
May 16th Commission meeting, in 'order ,that a compromise can'be met on
the present Coralville situation..
I i .
Mr. Bartel moved 'to: decide 'if .the Commissioniiants to consider o'ting
om the boundary ling 'at this meeting. Mr. Gibson seconded the motion-
on
motion carried. 'Mr. Dane moved that the black line be 'extended to
include "the total Coralville territory;i ,Robert Jie1'lamy seconded' the
motion:'' Jerry Zai.ser moved to table the motion to consider the black
fire; bls." Davi.dsen seconded the motion; ''the motion carried with trio
votes against. •
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Mr. Ilokanson explained that- within the goals''and objectives, in some
instances tile` Committees were unable to come to an agreement,'and have
left the decision to the Commission. Mr. Kattchee-.'suggested that these
specific', disagreements should bedealt with first, with a 'vote on each'
one individually.
Parks, Recreation, and Open Spacei
Goal rli Mr. White moved 'the adoption of the compromise proposal;
;•tr Barte! seconded.the motion; the motion carried.
Goal -#4: Mr. 'Dane moved the adoption of the PC/TC version; Ns. Dole
s:
econded:,
the motion;.ithe motion carried.
Ohjectivo k5: Mr. White moved the adoption of'the compromise proposal;
Ir, Vestal seconded 'the motion; the motion l carried.
Objective =11: IMr. Shoemaker moved the adoption of the PC/TC version;
Mr. Connell seconded the motion; the motion carried.
Objective #13: Mr. Koser moved the' adoption ofl the PC/'PC version
,•ir. Shoemake
r seconded the motion; !the motion carried.
Objective n15:' Mr. 'White moved the adoption of', the compromise proposal;
Mr'. Madsen seconded the motion; the motion carried.
Residential:
Goal ;2: Mr..Hadsen moved the adoption of the compromise proposal;
Mr: Dane 'seconded the motion; the motion, "
Mr. Bartel moved to ask the staff to 'give a brief discri.ption of the
differences in each case being voted on; Roberta Patrick seconded the
motion; the motion carried.
Coal #3: Ms. Davidson moved the adoption of the PC/TC version; Mr.
Connell seconded the motion the motion carried.
Goal nil': Mr. Gibson moved the adoption
'of the compromise proposal;
•'S
Mr. Vestal seconded the,,.motion; the _motion carried.
0bjective'•"•lgi 'Mr. '''Danc'moved the adoption of the compromise proposal;
h
. Koser seconded the ;motion; the motion carried.
Objective k2b: Mr. Madsen moved the adoption of the compromise pro-
posal; Mr. Connell seconded the motion; the motion carried.
•i,
I
I i
rd
..�+.
-5-
Obiect:ive`k2k: Air. vestal moved the 'adoption of the CACT'version;
Mr-.! Bartel seconded 'tho motion; the motion carried. -
i::
Objective'.r3c:.:Mr. Vestal moved that the CACT version be`adopted
striking the word "progressive"; Ms. Davidsen seconded the ,motion;
• the motion carried.
Objective k3g: Bir. White moved the adoption of the CACT version;
Ms. Patricki'secondedthe motion;',, the motion carried.
Industrial:
Goal 11*1: Mr Bellamy moved the adoption, of the PC/TC version; Mr. Dane
seconded the motion; the motion carried.
Objective kl: Mr. Wells moved the deletion of `Objective kl; Mr. Bellamy'
seconded the motion; the motion carried.'
Ms. Jacobs moved that the Motion #3 suggested by the staff be included
in the Objectives; the motion (lied lack of a'second. ;Mr. Kattchee'
suggested that this motion be taken up at a later date, prefer,rably
May: 16th.
I
Commercial:
Objective N :'' Mr. liVestal moved the adoption of the CACI version;
Mr. Czarnecki seconded the motion; the motion carried.
Objective k10:' Mr. White moved the adoption of the compromise pro-
posai.; Mr. Madsen seconded the motion; the motion carried.
Objective kll:- Mr. Bellamy moved the deletion of Objective kll;
Mr.Shoemaker seconded the motion. Alr. Madsen moved,to delete only
the words "to those"; Mr. Dane seconded the motion,; the motion carred.
Mr. Bellamy withdrew'the first motion.
Objective k13: Mr. Vestal moved the adoption of the ',CACT',version;
Ms. Patrick seconded the motion;' the motion failed. Objective R13
was deleted.
Mr. Gibson moved that the'deletion of this Objective in no way indicates
Commission displeasure with the Farmer's Market; Mr. Bellamy seconded
tile motion; the motion carried.
Miscellaneous:
Mr. Vestal moved that Objectives kla through klh be amended to road
• !'encourage" rather than "locate" all the way through :to be consistent;
Alr. ]dadsen seconded the motion; the motion carried.
Objective i and j: Mr. Madsen moved to have the Objective road: "To
require placement of underground wirinl; in 11011 subdivisions as well as
where underground wiring is replaced; hh•. zai.ser seconded the: motion;
the motion carried.
i
VRNMEN�S • • 8�/
C'0 01,
REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
ay
'S, 01V CON 22x soUTri DUBUQUE 'STREET IOWA CITY. iowA,5z246 (519( 351.8556
,,Regional planning iCommission
_'
„4Regularrng
,MontlyMeeii
may 16, 1973. 7.1.30 P:M'.
ltirst'Christian Church
-'17 Iowa Avenue; Iowa City
itembers.Pieserit Jacobs; btadsen',,_Dole,-'White, Wells;,Connell;
aarnec i,,, oemaker, .Kattchee,'.'Bellamy', {Val_1, Bartel, Sma11, Dane,
,-:Gibson; Smith', KnowIe'r Iiser,;,Saxton, Gardner
Members Absent: Vestal, Brandt."Cilek,'Goeti;''Sheets, Mashaw,
t,Patricki..Staa'F, Hill,jKoser, Kirchner,',Yeggy,, Wieland,rUlmstead,
;rCisar,-:;Nalley, Reyhons,.Davi.dsen, ,
Others Present: Don Alberhasky`,'°B`ruce'G1'asgow;"Paf Harding ,`'Press
Staff.°Present: Hilgenberg, Hokanson,iHolst
APPROVAL OF MINUTES,,.
Mr. Bartelrmoved5the app
rovalfof the minutes of„the, April; l8, 1973
meeting;.Mr.:,Shoemaker seconded';the motion; the motion carried.
FINANCIAL REPORT
Roland';`Smith'reported"that on 'May"16th`'there"was'a checking account
balance of $2',224:06 and a savings account balance of $37;849.59.
t
REPORT'`Or :COMMITTEES
Transportation Study: Preliminary"Land Use Pian
Mr. Kattchee, Chairperson, noted that'this.item had been continued
from;the meeting of May, 2, 1973; at which time a motion had, been
made,, by Mr'..Dane'to'extend,the urban `development line on, the plan
to'include all of the Coralville territory,,but,,that the motion
. had'been tabled and'not acted upon: "Mr. Dane, moved 'to remove the
motion from'the table and'thus bring it forward for discussion.
Mr,,Bellamy`seconded the motion. ..Mr. Hilgenberg suggested a proce-
dure;in'which the;;Commission would first discuss the Goals and
Objectives,;' the Narrative:'and then the 'Land Use Plan itself." After
a general discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission to vote
on the motion made by hir.'Dane. Mr. Kattchee called for a vote;
the motion 'carried with four against. Mr. Kattchee noted that the
original motion was then; on the 'floor and called for discussion.
f Mr. Hokanson:stated that at the previous meeting, all apparent items
of disagreement within the proposed Goals and Objectives were
resolved, but that any new items of discussion concerning ,the Goals
` and Objective "
7 s could'be brought out meeting.
Concerning the motion on the extension of the urban development',to
include all of the land within the Coralville City limits;'Mr. Hokanson'.
reported that at the Policy -Technical Committees meeting,;members of
the Coralville City Council and their'planning and Zoning"Commission
were present to discuss that question. 'He said the -vote ,of 'the;
Committees, afterdiscussion, was to include the total Coralville
area but to define undeveloped land West of -Highway 218 and that
North of Holiday Road as "holding areas." :Mr: Hokanson read the
definition of a holding area!:as suggested by ,the Policy -Technical
Committees. 11s.,Dole questioned]why the area around the 'Ramada Inn
was not des,ignated-;as a holding '`area. Mr. Hokanson explained that
the area surrounding th"'RImada Inn is :the'ofily area' in,`that vicinity
with `.service's:-:presently,available.
.�. �r,a .ti 1 .l
"Mr."Flokanson,read a draft:motionl„by which the Commission could
accept ,the preliminary land use -plan and concurrently refer the plan
to various committees for; further study.
q n
p motion to extend the urban
develo ment line to include all on thelville. Mr Kattch'ee cal {
Mr. Bartel called fora uestion
of Cora
fora -vote; the•mot-ion-carried.
M1tr. Dane suggested that in order! to be: con si5tant,`all area'within
Ithe corporate ,boundaries ':of Iowa'ICity should be included withinl,,the
urban:'devel;opment''line Mr. Dane made', motion•that theline of
proposed"urb'an` de'vel'opment be extended to' include, those'add'itional
!areas:in the south and southwest'portions of Iowa.City as "holding
,areas':; seconded by Mr. Bartel. Mr:' White 'noted that the' :additional
Corlayille area had;, been proposedas'{holding•areas',', but that the
Iowa,
'J, repre'sentatives''were satisfied with the'"urban reserve
designation for the Iowa'City areas`now under discussion."'M1ir. Dane
stated'; that' he ,would amend his motion to specify ,!!urban ..reserve" :?
indstead of "holding areas." Mr.'Bar tel seconded the amendment;
the motion carried,with tW06 votes against.
Goals and Objectives
f
Mr. Wells moved to adopt the Land Use ,Goals and Objectives as amended
by thc,Commission at the•meeting'of'May Z, ,'1973; Mr: Connell seconded
the motion. 'Mr.'Bartel;.,pointed"out that under the Miscellaneous
section Objective lh, it is emphasized'' that government agencies "
should'be located in the CBD, noting that this should be; stressed • "1
at this time since it is"pe'rtinent'to',the'present: situation concerning j
office space'for,the County government'. 'The,motion carried unanimously;.
I
'I
i
I
1 , i
-3-
Lan
Us
e'
at
ive
d Nar r '
Mr Ilokanson.generallyiexplained the purpose of, the Land .Use Narrative,
•
Stating that- the narrative,, should ;be, sent to ,the various committees
of ,the, ,Commission; for their, r'eview'and'`comment? over, a; six toy eight
inonth�`pe'riod Mr ;:1}lokan'son'; n"o,ted.''that the. Committees. should pay
special attention"to the 'referen'c'es 'to'ithe' central core area, . since
there are five separate studies now underway in this'arth an obvious
present;time,,all dealing with physical. planning,
meed for 'consideration.'
Mr Hilgenber.g:repor.ted,that Mayor Braned
dt of Cita Councilahadkconsidered'
h'im' to', convey :the message' that the iIowa''City, , Y
the entire p.'ro,posal,';for the; Preliminary; Land Use,, 'Plan and', IllId
,'the general theory and 'concept o'f the ietropol;itan''lan ,, use, p
}le said`.;Atr, Brandt stated';that the City:,Council had foundan'landuno
meet's with~ th'e general use ori space allocations in' the p ,,,,, ;,
" `arg'ument's with'' the liolding ,area's,;, an (further` ;that ;the Council was
of the opinion that ithe density�rprovi'sons'were generally appropriate.
"}ie said Mr. Brandt had indicated'; some specificiconcer. regarding
Density. 1': "'the ec'o'nomic 'feasibility tof'tlthe':peripheral density
proposal of 1'0�1'4'of
units pe'r acre'; 2 th'e overall impact io`f'such a
proposal oni,housing costs,; 3. the possible )impact of� this, tos`sible
nd ro rams, and 4' the,p
densit.y� proposal on;federally fh. 1 :1.1 `.,for th'e' A er,ly Dir:'Hilgenberg
''impact,)f"thi's p�roposahnon' pthe • g., ,,
states liar ',the staffs recommended„that these, concerns be},included in
the continuing study"of the Preliminar a
nd Use Plan prior to
'adoption as a'final,plan
"Mad
1 nell''seconded
Mr. Madsen moved to adopt ;the land use
narrative, be ,accompanied
by a''c'ontinuing''study of the land' use, o
the motion. 'Mr -III
'White 'noted that tlie:.'descripti,oil of a holding area
'`was' not' "yet, included in ,the motion Mr ` Bar,tel moved to amend the
motion concerning`the`lari3 use narrative to 'include the definition
of "holding, area” as proposed at the meeting'of the'Pol'icy-Te'c'hnical
Committees; on May, 7th, lir;., Bellamy seconded the motion; the motion
carried with; on'e vote against. ;,
1
''Kaftchee'called for a' vote°on the ,motion to adopt the land use
Mr. 1
narrative `as amended; the; motion carried.
Land Use Map
slier'motion had extended the prop
osed
that
an
e
a
stated tl desi -
iattchee st reviously g
Mr. ;ureas.
urban development line to include all
".those P
• nated by, a, des and the
otted' line. Mr1.. Hokanson reported on the areas of disagree
meet on tte
he,""map;betwe'en ahe Policy-Technica,l,ComHetsa'd the first
Citiiens''Advisory, Committee''(Transportation). where the
area 'was in'the area of the Iowa City airport and ,Highway H1, _
Policy Technical Committees suggested that,the Iorfier as area be designated
Indrch
ustrial'„with a`small'area atsthatwthe larger areaebeadesig-
ariificei, while;'ihe'CACT suggested
eared as'Research'and Office and the smallarea,at the sowthwest
corner as holding,' area After a general discussion, Mr. White
i q:d?.
Ir
-
4, -
noted that the -Iowa City City;Council",was satisfied with; the Policy -
Technical Committees' suggestion.
btr " Ciaineck} moved that the plan be amendedy,''as recommended by the
CACT' seconded by,Ms."'.Jac,obs. Mr Whi',te noted;that'the Narrative •
'ust,adopted;,deals.;with this matter, ;and ,that the,suggested,change
by't}ie'CACT'woulVbe inconsistent with "the Narrative. T}ie motion
was defeated':
Dfr. Hokanson reported the next item' of`disagreemeni:concerned'pro
-
posed Freeway 518. He said ,the CACI-suggested'that Freeway 518: not
be shown on, the.. map; and secondly that !a buffer ,strip should,„be
proposed "for;.hn,'area one;,'quar,t`er ofi a;.mite 'in width (on either; side
of any' freeway and, that adjacent ;land 'uses' b.e designated, 'as second
priority until, such time''asit 'could, b:e” demonstrated that' there
would;not be:'adver,se impacts "of 'a fr`e'eway 'on; adja"cent, land uses.
;',Dtr �1G� bson'mowed ;.to re)dclt the, CACT19"recommendation onr proposed
Freeway 518 and' other' freeways,'Mr Bellamy seconded the .motion; the
motion carred with one vote against,.
;
,.d g,a
Mr ,i tVhiJte moped 'the adoption of'the Preliminary Land Use :Plan as
origianlly, shown, Mr,. Madsen secondedthe motion., ,
•' r..,.r (1y1 .::I: Ci{l.. I ,, r IJ .. ,,r , ... ' .. �. �:�i r. Ci '.'. ,,'�-. .(.
Mr Kattchee c,alle'd for "comments from the floor.,Don 'Alb;erhasky
t.' identified;„himself, as an`,owneri'of, l'a'nd' in ,the ar d,::south ;of; the.
L-8 l, j*uque Street interchange,'I.,Iand'; he quer- -1.ed''.. I this area
J1.A designated a. holding; area Dir Kattchee explained that thi's
area ,Ts' diff icult;'"to develop -and would ,be studied in fur,ther''detail.
Mr.Kattchee' added' that' the presentaiap” should not be confused with
a (zoningf map'. "_Mr,_ Bruce,:Glasgow stated .his ,concerns, about the pre-
sent"'`demand ,for office and industrial Il'space,,but'side "of `the "central
area.;;. He "said, he,;felt ;that an inadequate, amount of ..land';was.
designated ,`on the "plan °fo'r this use. ,'Mr..Glasgow,suggested ,that
areasinthe"wicin'ity of'.frberconsidered
eewa'y inte"rchange's should,
for 'thispurpose.
In reference' to 'his motion on the floor, Mr.', White noted'it`d:id not
specifically include the holding areas "and urban reserve,areas recently'
added .to the„map. Dir. Bartel ;moved to amend'Mr. White's motions to
add the proposed "holding areas!', in northern and northw'e's,tern por-
tions of Coralville and -the "urban reserve”"areas in so'uthern''and
southwestern 'portions ,of Iowa City. Mr. Dane seconded the motion
to
ovon"
amend; themoticarried with one vote against-. Mr. Kattchee!
' ''
the amended motion to adopt the Preliminary
Land`.UsePlan; themotion carried. � '
Mr. ,White said. he would,like to: propose,a motion which would forwar�
y t was moved by `
the:Pxeliminar Plan to various Committees. I
Mr:. White:,
"That the Commission request that the Preliminary Land
Use Plan, which hasbeen adopted, be reviewed''and adjust-
ments'be recommended as appropriate by the various"
_5_
committees ,for later discussion and adoption,as a
final plan by the Commission;
Thatthe Regional Planning; Commission refer -the Preli-`
•
urinary Land Use'Plan-,to••the respective -committees }for -
rtheir,review.:'and comment,;.specifically-tothe Land Use-
Water:)Resource':'Committee:for special ,attention.to'the'
;`desnity.:question; to Jholding areas sand:?to •the=feasibi= `
ility-.of "down zoning"'or changing zoning; and�to'+alter-
snative,c:public,policies,.dealing with items to be included
in the 'urban reserve areas;
That:the �plan:,be ,referred;to the (Parks; Recreation; and
open r,Space(Comm ittee for gstudy,nwith:_speciil=!attention
'the'plan.s'zdevelopment "
to -•thea:relationship::between !
'
proposals and>the'jadopted 1970 open space plan,l
on Committees should continue
That 1the three Trans oul
to study the Plan to identify needs for'needs'for
ta'dlustments, 17!4ii1
:,,...
!the Citizens'- Advisory Committee study:the tPlanr ""
.,That
with?'sp:ecial attention'to'+itsa-effectsilonathe general
'coirimun ty' and'dts;compatibility with;>general ,community i.
,•,r
objectives,
I �
� �!1 `li !Cf •Er ' � ,'a �� e.'. "!I; !f(� I I; t,!"]'.. li 11. f +I •; ..
Commissionjrecognize�the "
That•the.Regional Planning
significance of a regional policy on population growth'
and economic development;'
sionsr.ecognize Sthe r ''
That the t.Reg ional-:Planning:Commi
importance of.a coordinated planning+process�;for-the
central part•'of=•the metropolitan area;! and•recognizel
the 'variouslstudies and plans now''being'-prepared,• ands
direct'' the Executive Board to meet with the :agencies
concerned with such planning to achieve a"pl;anning''
process which will implement the goals of the
iPreliminary'LandrUse Plan.
• 1 ,.I ;
,", 17 ' �:'. � 1... ;. iis
Dir. Ba the '.motion; the motion carried unanimously.
LandlUse-Water°Resource Committee
Mr. 1iilgenberg:reported'that the Land Use -{Vater Resource.Committee „
made 'a motion at its last meeting supporting the proposed moratorium
on!the county zoningland subdivision activities,^'Wand that the
Board
-Board is now discussing this matter with the of
Executive`
I
Supervisors.
�! r
=6
Human Resources .,.,L , ��,, ;;,C, „ ,0,1)u,8r,r
Mr. Kattchee'noted ,minutes for the various committees have been
distributed.-T-'Mr:'Hilgenberg reported in•;relationshiprito the Jusitce
and oHuman.jRelations t.Committm,lthat theiArea Ten,ICrime .Commis sion •
will meet in-sTipton;,;Iowa-,at.•1:30;)P,:M.,i.Fr,iday 'x-iMr:r;George Davis',l
Chairperson'j,of•,JHR,'?reported•.oniithe;:functions„ofsl'the,Committee;
which,;;jincludedtahe,{;steer,ng:.,committee of,>theuYouthSeru,ice Bureau;
the sLawnEnfor.cement Feasibility:i Study,, and `j oint;;facilities and ,the
1financing;;involved ',,Mr. Hilgenberg added'.that,;he:ran& Mr. ;Vestal
had discussed this matter with sGeorge"rOrr;' Iowa ,Crimer,Commission,
and the 'staff is in the process of preparing ..a revised application
for. FiscaloYear, 1972.,Reversionary�Funds„foirr.ih6�ientire'I'study.
Mr.iDaviss;added that,�i the Committee is;also,_.discussingda'drug,abuse
”and'alcoholism-Jpr'g
ogram,'.concerning!:iexistin for new'facilities.
Mr. Davis;;noted ,the Committee hasJalso;'been;,workinggon.;the Work
•,Program/Budget in'a joint:effort with 'the thre6-other Human,Re'source,.?
Committees:rr.I wu, r..`r
" -�nr„iii➢�i.'J(1�, bll ,i tri r,
Mr. Shoemaker suggested that a comment''from"the.,Commission concerning
ItheY� :temporar zoning 'moratorium ,would,be in,order since the:Land Use-
Water IiResourceAoimmittee has gone':on record;; n support';of,':;such 'an
Act ion'ir �Mr: Shoemaker•"�added this As action
and y.not,;the;.recommendation).oft;the,jfu1.1 ;Commission :!u Mr:, Kattchee
stated the; Executive Board has met with theBoard7of�Supervisors
and they will.discuss in`'further, 'Meetings the RuralLand Use” Plan.
II
Mr. Kattchee:apointed'outr.;the Commission!has;,not itakeni'a-stand on
thisrmatter:
gmo
Pat llarding,;landowner east. of River Heights," stated he was concerned
aboutiithe:possible"i,moratorium. ;Mr.Kattchee�sugge'sted he attend
the upcoming;-meetingawith';the'Board-iofiSuperwisors!since it is'a
publicrmeeting :. Mr..':Zaiser noted:thatita'moratorium;would possibly
Includel'Inew s
ub visionsiI,
EXECUTIVEI,,BOARD REPORT
Mr. Kattchee reported on the multi-county,,.organizational meetings
and stated there will be 'another meeting on May 24th, in Iowa County.
iMraiiKattahee;added 1;there'isia:preliminary°.document''which`was: ten
ts-
tively agreed upon'at the: last meeting. Mr. IWhite stated that
the consensus of the four counties attending the last meeting was
that a multi-county agency wou13' be mdde "up `of three "repres"e'ntatives .'.
n,from,;each. county; adding the: Executive!-Board f .r.equesting ,support
from;the Commission on this format of;membershi �Ms.,Dole,.
P
requested ,clarificationconcerning the staffing of;,the,agency.°
Mr..,Kattchee;reported that a Getter;from OPP` clarifies -'the•-require- •(„
ments;indicating.there must be an 'Executive Director is-ssome capa-
city., It was the consensus of the Commission to support the Executive:..'!
Board in their efforts. There was a general discussion concerning
the financing of a multi-county agency.
-7-
Mr. Hokanson reported
on the Long Range Mass Transit Study', and
referred to a recommendation
made by the Executive Board;to authorize
the Board to'iapprove a-final
study design for the:Long Range Transit
`•
Study and to execute a
grant contract., Mr.' Bartel ,moved the adoption'.:;
of the Executive Board
recommendation; Mr. Zaiser seconded the motion „,
the motioncarried.
BILLS FOR:APPROVAL
Mr. Bellamy moved the
approval of the bills as submitted; Mr. Saxton
,seconded the motion; the
motionccarried. r
DIRECTORS,REPORT
Mr. Hilgenberg stated
that the Work-Program/Budget would be pre-
sented to the:Commission
in the month of June and 'that :theie was,
a possibility two
meetin s'would be re uired t ete this
g q tocompT_ .
matter.,that
Mr. Bartel moved the meeting
be, adjourned; Mr. Shoemaker seconded
the motion; the motion
carried.' Meeting adjourned at 10,00 P.M%
6/11/73
73
/sb
ATTEST:
Robert Hilgenberg, ecreta l
Regional; Planning CommissionxY
iI
f
MINUTES
I'
The regular meeting of the' Board 'of Trustees of the Iowa
City Public Library was held Thursday, May 31; 1973 at
9 p.m. in the Director's Office.
President Downer presiding.
MEMBERS PRESENT:' Braverman, Buchan, Canter, Downer
Richerson, Summy.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Trumpp
'STAFF PRESENT: Hurkett, Kelley, Mascher, Neafie
OTHERS PRESENT: Mary Pat 'Conway, League of Women
Voters,observer
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the regular meeting 2
of April i 6 1
P 973 were
,,
approved. Moved -and seconded by'Canter-and Summy.
FINANCIAL REPORT
The Director expressed appreciation of being able to attend
the "Management Concepts:for Librarians" seminar at'Washing-
ton University (St.'Louis, 'MO) and commented that the sessions
were ver ''worthwhile.
Y ,
Therewas no current activity in either the and
,Gifts
Bequests or the Brubaker Fund, so the balance remained the
same as, lastmonth's. The ,financial report was approved.
Moved and seconded by Canter and Summy.
LIBRARY BILLS
Correction of: payroll from '$271,110.59 to $12,100.80', plus
$865.13 for insurance.
Approval of bills subject to correction of payroll figure.
(Summy, Canter). Revised total of expenditures for month
,
is $20,251.87.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT
The unusually;1, high turnover in personnel was'rerr•un, t
the Board. Connie Martin is replacing 'Peri Pass as
tary,rand Dianne Seelman is replacing Ginny C;1air: r Ik,
summer. Also, terminating' was Chris Lee.
_li_
-MEMO FROM NELLE NEAFIE, 7R CONSULTANT
Reminder: Workshop for Trustees this fall.
OLD BUSINESS
•
.
The Personnel Policy,as reviewed b y President Downer and
the Director is not complete enough to be brought before
the Board.
COMMUNICATIONS
1. The Director read a representative letter from a school
librarian praising Hazel>Westgate's craft, workshop (many
iiother
such letters have been received).'
2. President Downer asked for a special Board meeting
on capital improvements and revenue sharing funds made
available to the library. 'Discussion
is needed to clarify
our position.', The Iowa City Council will review
meet'to
irevenue.sharing funds on June 12"
3. 'The 'President of the Board recommended reviving the
Friends of the`Library suggested
and that the Committee
of Personal Relations meetto discuss the
"
ways and-means
of reactivating the organizations
4. The 'Nominating Committee for change of officers in
July was appointed. Appointees are: Chairman--Summy,
Bywater,and Canter:
The meeting was adjourned.'
Secretary Approved
i.
i
-3-
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING, June 7, 1973
Members present:. 13 uchan (presiding), Rihggenberg.,
Cantert Summy, Richerson (acting
secretary), Downer, Bywater
Members absent: Trumpp:, Braverman
Staff present: Hurkett, Eggers
The meeting was called t!
a o discuss the library capitalt
Improvements request from the City Council.
Mr. Hurkett presented several pressing needs I in the
library,
ranking them in:priority order. They are as
follows:
I. Building
A. Building consultant to determine new
library, building space and design needs
levaltiate
to ,the present facilities and o' w
best to improve them
5,000
B. Replacement ofa bulrnt-out air conditione:r
unit
1,000
:II. Shelving
A; Adult
2,000�
B. Children
3,000
Deteptionsystem to eliminate loss of books
and materials
14,000:�
IV. Additional miscellaneous equipment
8`000
$33,000�
Canter moved,:Bywater seconded that the library� board
ask the City Council for funds to cover costs. Motion
carried and the meeting was adjourned.
kill
SEVEN RIVERS CONSULTANT'S S REPORT
Nelle Neaf.ie
•
I. Visits, to Members
er
Belle Plaine (2)
Blairstown-
Center Point
Clarence
Fairfax
Hiawatha
a ath a
Keystone
Mechanicsville
Shellsburg
Stanwood
Tipton
II. Special Events
Evaluation--Vinton
Met with Marion'
Met Camanche Board
Meeting concerning Men's Reformatory'.
Chelsea--4 trips', 1 day cataloging
(working to establish a'-library
to 'open in June.)
is
-8-
,
i
SERVICE I
CE C 0 NT RA C TS
I: Number of borrowers
registering duringMay
Y 1973
Johnson County
Lone
Tree
e
Adult
99
North
Liberty
uve
Juvenile nle
14
6
1
e
—
7
Total
113
7
II. Number of registered
borrowers'to date
15
Johnson County
Lone Tree
Ad ult
868
North
Liberty
Juvenile
46
147
87
i Total
914.
2
14
~
i III• Number of items circulated during May
149
101
1973
Johnson County
1972 1973
Lone
Tree
North Liberty
Adult
1972
1973
. 1972
1973
Juvenile
1,282 2,098'
9101,282 '
133
88
166
64
100
88
106
251• '
Total
2,192 3,380
IV. Number ofitems circualted January - May
197
188
254
357
,'1973
Johnson County
1972 1973
Lone
Tree
North Liberty
Adult
7,966 9,807
1972
1973
1972
1973
Juvenile
5,881 4,241
641
561
999
846
366
259
687
641
Total
13,847 14,048
1,007
820
1,636
1,487
AWIMIA CITY
P1JBLIC LIBRARY
REPORT FOR
MAY 1973
USE OF COLLECTIONS
I. Circulation
1971
1972
1973
A. Adult Department
Books
13,709
15,908
16,893
Records
1,304
1,699
1,777
Art Reproductions
72 '.,
107
199
8mm Films
140
188
118
16mm f ms of viewers
_
TOTAL ADULT
15,225
17'-,976
19,062
B. Children's Department
17,118
18,662
20,716'
C. ^TOTAL CTRCULATION
32,343
36,638
39,778'
II..Interlibrary Loan
A. Borrowed
40
54
40
B. 'Loaned
180
208
376
C, Reference services to ILL.
III. Reference.Questions (Adult Department)
A. Interlibrary' Loam questions
46 '
72
77**
B. In person reference questions
_'454
479
610**
C.!:Mail Reference questions
36
D. !Telephone reference questions
293
55
692**
Total reference questions,
793
1,13
IV. Registered Borrowers
,
A. 'Adult. Department
14,301
16,962
8,203**
B. !Children's Department.
6,178
5,934
5,928
' • C. TOTAL HEGISTFRED BORROWERS
20,479
22,896
14,131
* statistics not kept until May 1972.
** statistics of reference services
*** these figures also
to ILL::;not kept
as such until 1/1/73.
are reflective
**** statistics reflect new policy RE
of Ii (c).
issuance
of new
the re -registration to obtain such cards;,' policy,
non -expiring
effective
cards and
.l/1/73.
-14-
-15-
•;h:owTH OF UOLLEC7I
!M.,
A.
Hooks
1971
1972
1973
1. Adult and Young Adul%
Fiction
16,683
._........ __...... _
17 531
17 599
Non -Fiction
34,129
40,338
44,223
Periodical Volumes
2,876
21876
2,876
TOTAL
53,688
60,745
64,698
2. Children's
'
Fict:ion _�
10,453
10,790
11,385
Non-fiction _ -
-
17,384
18,523
21,618
TOTAL
27,837 ','
29,313
33;b03
3. Total Books,Adult rind fhiL; er,'
81,525
90,058
97,701
B.
Recordings
*1,267
1,881
2,186
Tape recorTings--,---- - --
--Zb
C.
'Art Reproductions _
283
81
336
80
393
D,
8mm Films (Number of reel ;, __�
214
322
380
_ —
Microfilm
568
720 :
817
" Number
of albums; previous years„;:umeer'of in:ividual
recor
s.
FIiIAldCE: FINES ANL
FEES
1.
Fines Collected
Col _
_ -
' 6_ 13.85
$
—.00
$962.63:
$930.10
' • 2.
Non -Resident Fees Y
00
00
Other: telephone commission, -tax receipts
.00
11.90
8.76 .'
-15-
Carter:
I
May 31
- Ma or's Y
Y outh E m to me
p y nt Committee meeting
Carter
& Kelley: '
• May 31
-Book talk to two Central Jr. High reading
classes
Spaziani:
May 1
10
- ILA Legislative Committeemeeting, Des Moines
- United
Way Planning Division meeting;,
22
- United Way Information Referral Committee
meeting
Westgate.
May 7 -
Appreciation tea at Nelson School
9 -
Mobile/stabile' workshop
14 -
Stor time
Y and:,talk k on book care at P1 ayschool
May 8 -"Dimming
the>Lights on !the Public's Right to
Know"
This librar y joined other libraries across the
country in a,public relations effort designed
to bring to public attention the effects that
cuts in federal funding would have on library
services.
V. Tours
Sixth Grade Tours
Ma 14 -
Y
.,;
Penn: School '(45 students) '
May 14 -
norn School '(49 students)
May 15 -
Iowa City Catholic'(32 students)'-
May 21 &
24 - Lucas School (60 students) r
May 2
Y 3
Wood (45 students)'
VI. Gifts
25 Adult
non-fiction
1 Adult
fiction
8 disc recordings
I,
-18-
Library. Bills
�r}
4nea1973,;
Personal Scrv(cas
a. I'ayrul I
1
;. �'r� 't' t ..,�.ti•r
Ma
'.:i�`cl' y
$ 13,959.22
If
r
h..
I::
Commodities'
Crescent Ele ctric
Rosheks
4
Electrical Supplies
Misc..Operating Supplies
$61.44
2.00
Hach 'Brothers Co.
General Office; Supplies
Electrical
18.00
Quill Corporation
Supp lies
General OfficeSupplies
70.69
Doctors Supply
Frahs'ein,Su `1
Misc. ,Operating 'Supplies
48.90
Churchill Chemical Co.
General OfficeSupplies
5.25
55.55
+ -
I'
Lenoch &'Cilek
Industrial Supplies`
62.15
Mist, p Aerating Supplies
2777- 0.64
'
$344:62
Services and.Charges��
Cre scnet •
Electric
'Building Maintenance
D & J Laundry,
Woodburn
Laundry ,Service;!
$. 14.90
Sound Service
General Pest
Repairs,,to E ui
q pment
41:80
Control
3"P G.Industries
Building Maintenance
15:95
15:00
Northwestern "Bell
Buildin Ma
g ,ntenance
42.85
Northvestern;.Bell
Telephone Service
Distribution
10.40
North"
western'Bel 1
''
Wats': Service'..
4`•'04
Che no wet h -Kern Eleva for
Jeane[t
e
Buildin Main
g tenance
21. 86
e Carte r
Iowa Minois,Gas & Electric
Travel Expense
23.00
9.84
:Gas &'Electricity
Mennen=Ex Termite Coal
816.12
Eastman Kodak
Building Maintenance
37:08
Microfilming Service
—.48
$1;545.32
1
Library Gift and Bequest
Audio Brandon'
Rentals
Raymond &Raymond Inc.
ork
New fGraphic
Additional Equipment
$ 10.00
163:25
gociet•
>
Frame H s,
Additional Equipment
43:
Other11
Services
fig 2.41
$ 908.77
GRAND TOTAL
$16,757.93
i
iIi
r
i
s
is
p
i
4
.1
r
i
,
I l
Library Bills
June '1973
Persona I Services
•
1'ayrull
May
$
13,959.22
Commodities
Crescent Electriclett
E rica 1 Supplies pp
$
61.44
Rosheks
Misc.'Operating Supplies
2.00
T. 11. M.
General Office'' Supplies
18.00
Mach Brothers Co.
Electrical Supplies
70:69
Quill Corporation
General'Office-Supplies
48.90
Doctors Supply
Misc. 'Operating 'Supplies '
5.25
Frohwein Supply Co.
General'Office 'Supplies
55.55
Churchill Chemical Co.
Industrial Supplies
62.15
Lenoch'& Cilek
Misc. Operating Supplies'
20.64
$344.62
Services andh r
a
C es
B
Crescnet. Electric
Building Maintenance Ms
ce
I$
14.190
1) & J. Laundry i
Laundry Service
41.80
Woodburn Sound Service
Repairs to Equipment
Pm
15.95
GeneraU Pest Control i
Building'Maintenance
15.00
P.P.C., Industries
Building Maintenance
42.85
Northwestern Bell
Telephone Service
10,40
Northwestern Bell
Distribution
4.04
Northwestern Bell
Wats Service
21.86
Chenoweth -Kern Elevator
BuildingMaintenance
23.00
.Jeanette Carter
Travel Expense
9.84
Iowa Illinois Gas & Electric
Gas &.Electricity
816.12
Mennen -Ex Termite Co."
Building' Maintenance
37.08
Eastman Kodak
Microfilming service
492.48
$1,545.32
Library Gift and Bequest
Audio Brandon-
Rentals
$ '
10,00
Raymond & Raymond Inc.
Additional Equipment
163.25
•New
York Graphic Society
Additional Equipment`
43.11
Frame House
Other Services
692.41
$ 908.77
GRAND
TOTAL
$16,757.93
E
.1
It.
141
P Ti
✓
STAFF REPORT"
Planning l & Zoning Commission
June. 28, 1973'
SUBJECT: Z-7312. Rezoning request for
Bryn.Mawr Heights,I'Part v`'
(vic. east 'and west of a
southward extension of 'Sunset
Street) from R1A 'to R1B. ' 'I
ill
Filed: 6%18/73.
I 45-day,llimitation: ',8/2/73`.
STAFF " This rezoning request is
ANALYSIS: submitted in conjunction`,with
a subdivision'' plat, S-7309,
for the subject property.
The proposed rezoning is for 13.48 acres'" and is'adjacent to
Bryn Mawr Heights, Part III 'on the north', and Bryn Mawr Heights,
Part II on the',east,'both of which lare zoned.'R1B. This rezoning
would retain the single''family character.'of.the Area
Land use in, the.area'consists.of single family development on,;,,,.
beth the north.and the east; and vacant>lind on the '.south and west:.
The
proposed R1B use would be a logical extension of,the existng
11 i'
development inthe;area. "The rezoning_request::of 13.48 acres
would contain42 lots, in addition to thei.platted street right-,
I
of -way. !i The minimum,lot size for the proposed^accompanying;
subdivision is'9 000 's quare feet,aubstantially larger thanrthe
•
min imum',6;000square`'feet allowedcunder R B
1 z i
on ng but slightly
smaller than the 10, 000 square feet under Rl.A'zoning.
;
STAFF The Staff recommends approvall
RECOMMENDATION:
of the�rezoning`request;from
R1A to' R1B. 1
I
I,
01
1
I
STAFF,, REPORT
Planningo&'Zoning.Commission
rr
June 1128; 1973
SUBJECT:
5-7303. Andover Garden
Apartments','Preliminary Planned
Area Development (Vic. along
Haywood Drive west.of Laura
Drive). Preliminary'PAD'filed:
3/23/73. Latest submission
filed: 6/21%73. 45 day
limitation: 'waived:'
STAFF
A partial submission for -a
ANALYSIS:
revised plan..for,,the Andover
Garden" Apartments Preliminary
Planned Area.Mevelopment has
been submitted for
review by Planning and Zoning"Commission
and Staff., A copy
of that submission is'attached with this.
brief report. In
that the::submission is' -partial and;,has been
submitted at such'.4
late date,: the Stafflhas been unable to,
pr ovide>a complete
anal ysis:;,and review,at this`:time. .Additional
-comments,'and:review:.will be,forthcoming'iat the Planning and:
Zoning Commission
meeting of 'June%28, 1973.1
� 1
s
I
-;i
I
FYI
t
I
ti
1
!lf
f
I
Y:
al
s�I
r
I 1
I I
I u I
STAFF REPORTL;
,I
Planning&Zoning Commission
June ,28, 1973
I
SUBJECT:
5-7309. Preliminary plat:for"
I
B ni:Mawr:Heights,'P
rl'art'V " vic '
�
'i'
east 'and west of a 'southward
-
extension ofl'Sunset Street)":
Date .filed: ,,5/14/73.
45-day limitation: 6/28/73.
STAFF
ANALYSIS:
The'Staff Report of June 14, 1973
is reference for, details
concerning the preliminary
I"
I
plat for'Bryn Mawi,Heights,
noted that the only.problem'.remaining.onl
Part V. At that time it was
thel',plat was "that', the
`
lots were too small to conform totthecurrent 'zoning)"of;`R1A`.
On June 18, 1973 a rezonin ,filed
g;reques
Subjectproperty
was to rezone the.
Approval for this,`subdivision.
plattheniscontingentlupon
.
he�"r ezoning approval for the
Far
I
STAFF
The Staff recommends approval pproval
of, the;prelima
inry;subdiv,ision
'plat contingent upon approval
'
of. rezoning of `the area cfiom
I
,p I
i
I
RlA to R1B.
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
i
IL,
I` i
'"
STAFF REPORT ,
ry
Planning &'Zoning Commission
e
June,28 1973,
SUBJECT: S-7311': "Braverman -West Large
Scale:j`Residential Development "
Plan ;,(southwest of ahe "in'tersect
' ion
Of Mormon Trek Blvd.. and, Benton:'
St.). Filed 6/21/73.
`45 -day. limitation: $8/5/73.
STAFF. Attached 4s:.acopy of .the:'
ANALYSI i
S: submission forL the Large';Scale
Residential'Development Plan.
It Js the intent of the
":.
developer that, this be considered 'as"a Preliminary Planned Area
rl.
Development plan that would replace the;one originally approved
"•
by the Planning & Zoning Commission earlier this year. ,Due to
the-,.latenessof the submission, ahe Staff has :been unable to
provide a proper review and analysis for.the Commission as,of,
this time. "Further, comments ,will ',be forthc6ming" atAhel.Planning,;
&;Zoning CommissionImeeting.of June"28, 1973. "
e`.
r
i ;
r
h
I
i'
i
a
r
,t
n
WEI
'I _ ...-..
�...
--..., -_..
' I ;,
I 'rte
^^2::
i• -:.'-.e �..: I:..
-e = r k � i
�-.
;
�
�
4
)
I
l
aLL
Y` r
'
.tea
I
I-
r'r
f-s°/{kN�
STAFF REPORT`.
Planning &Zoning Commission
'June 28 1973
SUBJECT:: V-7302'..,Alley vacation between
Pleasant'Street ands Reno;St.
Filed:.' 5/29%73. 'No AS -day
limitation.
STAFF A petition for the vacation of
ANALYSIS: an alley between Reno and
Pleasant Streets has.bee'n-
submitted: ,by;`the�adjoining
property owners as listed on the attached copy.of the petition.
The Planning, Staff, has reviewed the petition and the site and
finds that the conditions are essentially as `presented by the
petitioner. The portion of `.the alley that is requested to; be
vacated is presently unused as an,alley,and is not needed,by
"
the City.
The Engineering Division is currently checking for sewer and
waterlines' and will':h'ave a°,report at•the Planning'and Zoning '
Commission meeting June'281973. ;Assuming ;that.there is
,of,
no' problem with with in thelalley right-of-way, the Planning!
Staff'sees no' -reason :why; the vacationlof these alleys should not
be recommendedito City Council.
STAFF The Staff will give a recommen-'
RECOMMENDATION: dation at `the Planning"and
Zoning Comm ission''meetingiof
June, ',.28, ,1973 based on,I,the
Engineering .,review and
recommendation.
r
I
IL
i
I
9
rs W 9s es . es
.e} j .0 /
ns n IRS
e
G 7
sn' : .f. • f. s S� 42.5
3
z
/:o
`
3
4e
B7
bo'
o
ce'
OAX L&W-0 '
• �. .
o
L
NO w
P AQk
to'
to,
to
ca
60
y
/4
aro
7.�
o
/3
'�I
2
9
4
sti
cc,
ca"
to'
to,
^
REQUEST
m
STREET •°
�
•°
0 •
33S
/o �
,,AREA
9
rs W 9s es . es
.e} j .0 /
ns n IRS
e
G 7
sn' : .f. • f. s S� 42.5
3
z
/:o
`
3
4e
B7
bo'
ce'
9
rs W 9s es . es
.e} j .0 /
ns n IRS
e
G 7
sn' : .f. • f. s S� 42.5
dI' d0 40
3io04 5'
BEET � � �17 ► QUA/ �
3
z
/:o
`
3
4e
B7
dI' d0 40
3io04 5'
BEET � � �17 ► QUA/ �
irr�
V M
h y zZ R/ Xe /9 /B /7 /G /s %' /3 b � � �Lj N 2f'
f•
.12
3
,Z
/ V
irr�
V M
h y zZ R/ Xe /9 /B /7 /G /s %' /3 b � � �Lj N 2f'
City; of IOWA, Cl*
AL
N" DUM
MIEM A%
11
DATE May 24, 1973
TO: Ray S. wells
FROM: Dennis R. Kraft'
REa Conditional'Per tted Uses
Attached please find the draft copy of the ,Conditional
Permitted Uees.propoaed;to
be allowed in the R3 and
zones. 'Specifically I would like
to draw your
attention ,to Section 5 which relates`to clubs and
lodge$•.
I believe the comments contained in this'
Section are fairly self-explanatory."'
A1.s of this time we have not yet had an.opportunity to
look into the of
question whether non-conforming;and/or
existing church buildings could be "changed to these
uses in any particular zone.
to
�s
UI►UUIMU 61
- —
t.
DISTRICTS R3,'
,R3A
Conditionally
Permitted Uses j
1. Fraternity and sorority houses
Parking:
Minimum of� one -off-street parking space per two
occupants,.-)
Maximum,
Floor. Area Ratio: 0.3
•, Maximum ,Ground
Coverage Ratio: 0.15
Minimum
Yard Requirements: Side Yards - 15 feet
Rear Yards - 25 feet
Front Yard - Average, of.the setbacks
=of, the';neighboring,dwellings.
2• Hospitals and
Institutions (except animal; criminal and mental
hospitals)
Parkingi
Hospitals, one and one half off-street parking °
spaces per, bed. (2,)
Iaetitutions, based on planning revieM.(3)
Maximum
Floor Area Ratio: 0.3
Maximum
Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.15
Minimum
Yard Requirements: Side & Rear Yards,'two feet of
depth,forevery one foot! of
building height measured at w
the nearest point'of the build*
In no case may'a hospital or institution be
so located as to create large volumes of
is
through traffic upon a collector or lower'classifi- ;
cation street upon which it is located if said
collector street;is the primary means of access
to 'abutting dwellings.
�1
3. Clinics '(except
animal)
parking:
:One off-street parking space per 100 square
feet of Gross Floor Area. (4)1
Maximum
Floor Area Ratio: 0.3
Maximum
Ground Coverag a Ratio: 0.15
Minimum
Yard Requirements: Side yards, ,.15 feet' I
Front yard, 20 feet
I
Rear yard, 25 feat
In no case
may a clinic possess access to a local street
I
if such
access.would create large volumes'oE through I
I
traffic
on said`local'and said local street is the primary
�.
means of
access to abutting dwellings.
4• Nursing and Custodial,,
1
Homes.
Parking:
One off-street parking apace per three beds. (5)
Maximum
Floor Area .Ratio: 0.3
Maximum
Ground Covera a Ratio:.0.15 1
I, I i
Minim um
Yard Requirements: :Side Yards il15 feet!
eq
I
_
Front Ya 0 feet'
ro rd 2
Rear Yard, 25 feet
r
I
sass access to >;
e o s
In no ossa may a nursin or custodial home Y ..B p
a local
street if such access would create large volumes of
through
I'.
traffic! on said local and said local street in the
primary
means of access to abutting dwellings.
I Si
iI
,,
M.
-3,
5 Clubs and Lodges
Parking:' One off-street space per four seats,
3arking
or ' 1 space per 0 0 . scjua3Ee feet of floor area,
w ich6 'M
whichever i a: gFeater.
Maximum:Floor Area Ratio: 0.3,
Maximum Ground Coverage I Ratio: 0.15
MinimumYard Requirements: Side :Yards, 30 feet
Rear Ya rds 50 feet
Front Yard Average of the set-
backs of the' neighboring dwellings
or 30 fest,-whicheverlia greater.
All clubs or:lodges shall have frontage on 'oa street of,arterial
,
service level classification. No club or lodge shall be so
located an to.:create'la;ge volumes of 'traffic on, anPcolle6tor
ii
or. local sery'ice'level street which.piovegi,'the,primary,meansI I
ofaccess to dwellings thereon.
Off-itreetiparking areas. shall'be fully screened from!,: he'il'':
street and adJacentland uses by.a green belt planting:; strip. .
7 1 1
consisting of��evergreen ground cover with hardy' shrubs.Such
planting stip shall be of sufficient width and density to
provide an effective screening with shrubs:not less than 6,
feet in height, within two years of being planted. In'lieu
at construction ok'p nting rips, a 6 foot fence`of shall
be allowed. This planting strip shall be maintained in a!
suitable condition.
(1)" Zoning; Parking and Traffic, David,K. Witheford;and George
E., Kannan, ENO':Foundation for Transportation, Saugatuck,
Conn.�, 1972, P. 86.
(2) Ibid, p. 87.
(3) Ibid.
(4) Ibid.
(5) Ibid.
6) 1bid', p
... L �. .i
i
f0: MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
The following is a brief narrative description 'of each
of the;
expenditures herein proposed. Allocations have been
made for each of the first three entitlement periods on a',
priority basis. The balance of available funds are proposed
to be allocated to
,financing of projects to be considered' in
the Capital Improvements Program of 1973.
OPERATION 'AND MAINTENANCE
1.` Transportation ---
Providefor the purchase of two new transit coaches
and additional bus accessories as previously dis-
cussed.
Public SafctY - --
To'purch'ase additional equipment and provide for
the improvement'ofitIe police records information
system. Funds would also be'used in 1973. ($36,',000)
to:hire six (6)'additional police' personnel, the
cost of which willibe''assumed by the operating bud-
get in futureLyears.
3.`, Financial Administration - --
To'support the initial costs involvedin-establish-
ing a central procurement capabi.lity with the 'Depart -
meet of Finance. including salaries for the bal'an'ce
''These
of, 1973. costs would 'be absorbed the'
,into
operating'budget in future years.'
4.' Code Enforcement --'-
In, 1973additional equipment would be purchased; for
the purpose of dispatching.insPectors in the field.
Additional costs represent funds.to intensify, local
building code enforcement
activities by hiring
personnel. This burden will be folly supported
F
by'general revenue sharing ,funds for a period of five
(5) years.,,'
5. Social Services_
--
This allocation represents an estimate of the City's
.
contribution to area -wide social services. Itt is
intended that this be an annualcontribution 'to one
'
agency ,that will exercise administrative 'control and
supervision on 'a County -wide -basis with reporting
responsibility to the City
Council for funds advanced.
6. Librar y---
To provide for the purchase of additional equipment
as requested by, the 'Library Board and also to:make
structural improvements in the Library building as
a result of a recent _safety inspection. The improve-
ments would include a secondary means of egress from
I
I,
6.
Library---(cont'd)
both the third -floor area and the auditorium.
CAPITAL
OUTLAY
1.
Civic Center Remodeling ---
To provide for the renovation and remodeling of the
Civic Center as previously discussed by`the'City
Council:'
2.
Ralstonr
C eek Study ---
This expenditure would provide funds for consul-
tation services for the improvement of the Ralston
Creek watershed. This report would serve as the
basis for long range capital improvements antici-
I
pated in'the'Capital Improvements Program of 1973.
;
3.
Central Equipment Facility---
To provide funds for ,the preparation of plans and
specifications prior t6 final 'consideration by; the
City Council land voter approval of`the=project':
4.
Animal Shelter---
To provide funds for the preparation of, plans and,
Specifications ;prior 'to final consideration by'the
`
City Council and voter approval of`the project.
=�
v:
5.
Public Safety Headquarters-
To'provide funds for the preparat'i'on of plans and
,specific'ations'prior;to final consideration:by'the
City Council'and voter approval of the project.
6.
Other Capital Improvements Funds---'
These amounts ;will be allocated in the Capital,'
Improvements Programs to finance expenditures`
which, as of :this time, are unidentified'. Specific
allocation of, these funds to capital; projectswill
be made'rprior,'to Council discussion of the 1973
Capital Improvements Program on June 19, 1973.
f
n r ri
-2_
PROPOSED
REVENUE SHARING`EXP ENDITURES
j
JUNE 12,
1973
1
ENTITLEMENT PERIOD: 1/72-6/72
2
7/72-12/72
3
1/73-6/73
4
7/73-6/74
5 6
7/74-6/75 7/75-6/76
7
7/76-12/76
TOTAL
Amount
Estimated $
214,000
$ 205;000
$ 254,000
$ 490,000
$ 502,000 $
514,000
$ 2701000
$2,449,006
EXPENDITURESPROPOSED:
(Operation and Maintenance)
Transportation
' Public Safety,
96,500
70,000
$ .' 96,500 -.
Financial Administration
15,000
70,000:,;
',
' Code Enforcement
Social Services'
7,500
15,000
15,000
15,000
7,500
15,000
G0,000
Library I35,000
35,000
75;000
75,000
75,000
35,000
295,000;
SUBTOTAL $
,(Capital Outlay,)
189,000
-
90,000
42500
35,000;7
571,500
70,000
90;000
90,000
Civic 'Center Remodeling
200,000
200,000
Ralston Creek Study
Central Equipment Facility
25,000
5,000
60,000=
90,000 ,
Animal Shelter
50,000
7,500
50,000`•:
Public Safety Headquarters
60,000
7,500
SUBTOTAL 2$ 5,000
205,000
.1171500
60,000
60,000;;
$ ,
407 500;:?.!
AVAILABLE FOR OTHER CIP PROJECTS -
-
$ ,66,500
$ 340,000
$ '412,000 $
424,000
$ 227,500
$1,'470,000 ;!
TOTAL $
214,000
$ 205,000
$ 254,000:
$74 10 _,000
$x,502,000 $
514,000
$ 270,000
$2;449;000j'
6:
Ir
a�
r
TO:,,': MEMBERS OF THE'CITY:COUNCIL
Presented herewith for your consideration'and'approval is the'revisod
Capital Improvements Program 1973=1977. ,Consideration in this recommends=
tion has been given 'to the':many discussions between the Council and staff
on,the -fiscal policy, general revenue sharing, and capital improvements
needs since April 10, 1973, and to comments received by the Council at its
public meeting of May 17,.1973.
In determining the scheduling -of programs for' -completion within the
next five years, it was necessary to concentrate on the financial resource
limitations that have been established by;'law and by Council <action, 'i'.e.,
the Pew,ly,1 adopted fiscal; policy. In each'of the years of.this,first program
we have limited as,much as'Lpossible the; general; obligation bond': debt',to an
increase qf'approximately 1,000,000 per year except for those non-recurring
ma or ro'ects which are funded over and above this limitation. 'In addition,
anamountlbeginning at $250,000 in 1973 and increasing to'$300,600 in 1977
has`_been earmarked from Road Use Tax funds for use in new street construction
projects, leaving a;: sufficient amount of -these -,funds -available on;an annual-r.t
'
basis for major maintenance' and repair projects as;.necessar Water Sewer
and Parking:.Expenditures'have
been''indicated as self-supporting from -revenues
either on an annual`outlay,;basis.or through revenue bond 'debt.
'
General revenue sharingJunds have been allocated to capital outlays as
r
indicated on the report to Council:of June `12 -,19731 -No reserve; a
, h s been`pro-
vided for 'operation maintenance
and expenditures this procedure can
.however'
be amended as additional revenue sharing and CIP plans are formulated'during1.
the 'next few, years,'
All of ,the above assumes that the ongoing annual operational expenditures
for general government can,be provided under the ,30 mill tax limitation imposed
by State -Law:, As, annual. work programs are'developed to'carry out't}ie overall
direction of facility improvements and service levels outlined in this plan,
constant evaluation will be necessary to control the use of available funds
between capital outlays and operating costs. ;
An indication of this plan's impact on the City's debt structure is demon-
strated by 'the following table which illustrates ,a'proposed authorization sched-
ule for those `general obligation bond issues requiring voter approval and 'a
schedule of bond sales. Alliof the issues projected will;,comply with the recent-'
'
ly adopted fiscal policy an'd a detailed projection -`of the'debt'structure will be
presented after agreement on this program. Bond issue amounts have been rounded
for
illustration purposes. '-
i
1
I
I
I
TABLE LE I
G•,'; O.BOND
AUTHORIZATION ATI
ON' SCHEDULE
SCHEDULE:
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
`Animal Shelter
X
—
Central, Equipment Facility
X
Recreation, Center%Addition
P
PublicSafety, Facility
g
X
Library Building
X
BONDS SOLD:'!
1
Voter Approved
Other Proposed•
$ -
$2,600,000
$,;1250,000
$2,050,000
;$
TOTAL.00
24-51000
?,000
1 400 000
'0 pa
1,200 000
1,
860 000
2,910
(.1'720;000
'
'I
i
I.
:.
I
1 ,720,,000
Ic
I
1
Avera
L- ge,$1,086,000 per
,year
1
't
1
1
1
I-
i
I
119
CITY OF IOWA,CITY,
:SUKMIARYOF.,1973-77
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGM
BYSOURCE OF
FUNDS
TOTAL
1973
1974
1975
1976
OTHER THAN CITY FUNDS
Federal Aid
10,138�500
915,900
1,766,300,
�'?,741;10 0
3,040 2W
1,675,000
State -Aid
Special Assessments
25,000
952.500
25,000
412,500 �
95 000;
so 000
�95.000,
200 000
SUBTOTAL
—1111-6-,000
1 3 S3, 400,
1 861,3UO
2,891,100
,3;135, 2001
CITY FUNDS
Operating Revenue
4,529,270 v
1,210,000
971;100
829,280
677,390
641,500
General:Obligation
Bonds13.880%
572,260
3,983,570
1,447,750
2,890,300
1,720,000
"
Revenue Bonds
5,,i4V';000,
787"500
3,4651,000
�1AB500
7
10-0,00-0
20,683,150 ,
782,260.
5,742 170
5,742,030
4,95S,l 90
2,461,500
GRAND TOTAL
31i7991,156:�
3,135 660
7 603 P470
8,633'ilM
3
8,090;390
_336,500
14,
1 N
"
Y✓htlIQJS the City Of IOWA C_t1 .6
(CIIY, County or State Aponcy)
1
/wva, by rtlsolution duly passed hcrtltolorfi,' has resolved that It will provide during tlio calendar year of 1973 '
cash funds for the following lotva Crime Commission projactst
Brie. Oolcription Amount of Funat
of Project - Doing Provided
1. YABtropolitan InvestigativeUnit 0-
2.; (00-702-25-001-000-72)
G
7.
We lurther resolve that wo will provide in-kind match during tho calendar year of ' 1973 /or the following projects:
Brief Omariotion - Typo of In-kind — '.Valualion of
of Project '. (Salary, Soaeo• ete.1 In•kina Provided
Yatrot�.olitan Investigative,,Unit Salary $ 2,061:00
2 a Personal Benefits 2,533:00'
'
s n n: ; '. 11 Office'Sttc�lies 25!00
r r
5 $ 4,619:00
7.
Passed d)is 19 day of jt1ne 197 3
r
•
Sipnaturo
(Cnairmon, Mayor ane/or Director of state Ayoncy)
•
•; •� "..
(Member)
(Auditor • City Clark) (Momber)
t
.I
f
C1:
a
i r , I
2
ii
e. Recreation,
f Libraries
g. social services for the'poor or aged.
h. Financial administration; and
2 0 : rdinary.and necessary capital expenditures authorized by, law.
Regulations on the use, of funds proposed by the Department, of. the
Treasury were
published at 38 Federal Register 4918 on February
220 1913' The
proposed,regulations set forth.g—eneral:linformati
on anddefinition of terms;:'prescribe
reports and report publicity required
1 1
by the,Department; contain rules regarding the computation allocation,
I
and. adjustmenti of entitlements; describelprohibitions a r
on thie.use 'restrictions
of revenue sharingnd!
funds, and, Specify the.fiscal procedures
and auditing
requirements, as well
a itih . as;SPPcial.fiscal procedures and:,
ud r6quriemeints, where
a recipient'government has failed to
comply with the regulations., in addition the Director,of the
Revenue-
Sharing, Off i6erecently announced that the first Planned U
Se reports
will be sentto state and local governmen s by,April '9 1973: Each
recipient': 3en
government must indicate on!this
.'form ithe!amount of
revenuesharingfunds to spendin
eachof thePiiority'categ6ries
specified. in the�law.jhese:;pl 't " 1
ans,,mus also
o f7general local .circulation;for public information
, and comment,'
andreturntolthe .Revenue,Sharing Office within :Sixty days, or June 91973. .
�The.first,report required bylaw`indicating-the wareach
recipient
.governm government
.1s 1s actually!spending the ' revenue,s harin9, funds will
by September 1973.
I!,
;:be:required
GENERAL COMMENTS ION ,ALLOCATIONS
The passage of general revenue sharing legislation,,and the sub -
Sequent allocation of those funds to local
municipal -g6vernme governments has
started to fulfi e of t
11 the:promis he'!Federalladministiati to
on return
the process of local Se'lf-determinati6n to local government. There
:to
appears be little disagreement. amonglocal of ficials and citizens:;
that sufficient
community needs exist for the.'use of he funds.
'SomedIsagreementmay
exist on exactly what' the needs are, but: itis
a pparent',that:the amount of r6venueisharing funds
will not
forbe enough
any city to meet of the needs 'Which can beidentified'.- There: -
fore, , There-
priori ties must beset.
In the past Federal categorical.grants were announced by'
Washington and
accompanied by.guidelines and regulations that'�specified
the'pro:cess
by whichany federal fun4migfit be obtained and used.
Federafrevenue
sharing guidelines 'only;indicate general areas where
•:funds,may be
ti
spent. This leaves the process� ofdeveloping thepriori
ties f6i:expenditures to the local
governing bodies. The general:
revenue sharing id!
gu elines are simple to the point that they do
illustrate
not -
to local governing,agencies the very practical problem roblem of
theprocdss�of
how to decide at the local level the
j�
i
' -3-
e affect the physical and human needs of the
prior es as they
community.`,
It is''to the process of determining the priorities for the use of
'suggested
.followin guidelines are proposed
revenue funds that the 4
of establishing a framework in
to the City Council for the purpose
to develop financial data as it may apply
which the staff may proceed e factors
b the City.'Council. The following ar
,identified
to 'each areay
to be considered.:
1. Future financial integrity.
The present genera l' revenue sharing measure will provide
funds to state and local governments for.a five year
the actual amount of
period:Within that fivelyears,
fluctuate to reflect the relative
money shared,could
shifts of tax efforts and population/income be
would
various states and localities. Sound management wo
should weigh proposed.
,indicate
that ;the local government
the.,potent al long term!
expend tures.;against
such expenditures may create. if ,revenue sharing concludes
at the ,end of.five years, will the project or'prod'do
does
"carry,'ts own weight? Within the five year period
of the activity"permit or
the short or long ,term nature
maximum 'flexibility in terms 'of alternative'use of
inhikt
'. the funds? !Will the expenditure enhance the overall fiscal
position of ;;the local government?
iI
2. Lack of other available resources
re venue`,sharing funds should only,
Under most circumstances
be used where no other funding source exists. It is
consideration
important to remember that this management
p alternative funding be
works 'both ways. Not only should
sought for, proposed activities, ,but tkie security of; the.
existing funding for on-going activities should be con-
sidered as well.
Revenue sharing funds, though not intended as replacement
federal'program may;
funding for ;budgetary cuts in other
be:relied on for these purposes. For
nevertheless' have to
example, it `should be noted that the ,same bill which
brought us- revenue sharing also', placed an appropriations
the:Social Security
limit 'on the social service sections of
the;ourtailment of
Act. "In many states this could require
at the local level', unless
certain social service porgrams
the state makes up'the.-loss with its revenue sharing funds..
Loc al; government '(particularly ,,county) revenue sharing funds
may also have to be used for this purpose..
-;
B. Generates' or causes savings of'revlenue,
Does the project either generafei.new revenue or increase
efficiency so that,costs .'are .reduced? ,.You will recill:that
�'we claim that would accrue .to,local''
one ,of theattributes
governments given flexible financial 'assistance would be our
efforts to generate new,and,ibetterways of accomplishing -given
objectives. Possible candidate "activities which would rate!:
'high here- would be'ones which would provide some sort of.
reli.ef,for I a special capital improveient fund.which could,`
then be used to increase:bonding 6apacitylorito assume the
debt service for such capital endeavors as public building,
construction in order'to-free the bondable capital for use
in a similar endeav6r'elsewher6.
9. Buy iinto other programs
;By funding projects in this area does the city exert
influence over programs ,"that ''it heed's- in -order: to impi6vd
thebverall level of services?, s , Forexamp e, if law,en-
forcerrtent�iis a problem with ,:.city .poli6e,. county. srheriff,'
,
coorporating being imperative for the solution, (could
operation by,cieaiingJoint recordsradio
.,
require cc j,,
'�)Ithen_the,Jund
,-
and idispatch, operation funding of�suchopera
tions should take on high priority.
•
10. Speed of implementation
'The.interim regulations require thatithe revenue sharing
funds from ' each entitlement period should be put to the ' ir�
. 'thin;24.+monthsrfr6mdate the
'a0propirate.,uselwithin , I
0
receipt of'each :check. : While it,is,possiblet obtain a
Treasury Department extension ofthisitime requirement it
stands to reason"t tactivities which show'thepromise':
of 1 quicker actionshould, receive some 'priority,considera'-
tions.
T i
It does appear that! specif ic attention should be paid to not.
allocating general revenue.sharingito:
displacing any of the, on-going level of tax effort
t6,cieate severe tax fluxuations.
relievecurrent operatingexp enditures without sufficient
planning for !replacement.revenue beyond the five year
A.
period.
fill!
create obligations to programs which wouldnot be a reason-
able responsibility of local government in:'the future.
any activity whichis not under the direct jurisdiction
or contractural obligation of the City Counci.
Y:'W
POSSIBLE"EXPENDITURE AREAS
I, public'Safety menu'
'Modernization.of,Equi P
$ 40,000
350,000
A.
B. `Manpower Requirements
70;000
C. 'Code Enforcement
II. Environmental Protection
p. Solid Waste Programs
including recycling personnel
$ 150,000
Cap, Improvements)
B. Sanitary Sewer Improvements
III; Public Transportation
$ 90,000
A. Additional Vehicles
850;00 0.
B. 'operating Subsidy
400;000
C, Traffic Signalization,
Street.Lighting-Sidewalks
IV. Area Social Services
3S o;eoo
A. Health, Public Housing, ograms
Social Service Pr
$ 600,000
1..
Manpower,
V. Recreation
$ 330,000
A. Fee Subsidy Program
I. L ib'r ariesl
V E ui ment
'le P
q
$, —30-; 000-
'.
A. .Mobs
VII, Financial Administration
A. Central Purchasing
$ 1351000
Data Proces,
VIII. Capital Improvements
$ 175,000
A. Civic Center
240,000
B.', ParkAcquisition
100,000
Cl.< Animal Shelter
1,300,000
, Public Safety Facility
2,500,000
E.' Central Equipment Facility
2,500',000
F. East-West; Trunk Sewers.
TOTAL ESTIMATED GENERAL REVENUE SHARING
$ 2j 312000
�__�
r
ro 0 se a
the.. P
NOTE priority in P
identified are
1. Most items high
Pr o r a
Capital Improvement.,, g_
for one-
to five -y ear proje ct s.
2. ',Dollar amounts are estimates
,
,