Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-12-04 Bd Comm minutesMINUTES IOWA CITY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION NOVEMBER 19, '1973 The Iowa City, Human Relations Commission met in regular session on'November"19, 1973 at 7:30 p.m. in .the Civic Center Conference Room. MEMBERS PRESENT: Donald Hoy Richard Braverman Paul Neuhauser Mori Costantino Sally Smith Celia Roberts_ John Balmer MEMBERS ABSENT: Phil Jones s E. J. ,Means STAFF PRESENT:Kay Maune Nancy',Vollertsen Nick 'Smeed 'Phe first -item of business was the approval of minutes. The minutes of October 15,' 1973 were unanimously approved as presented. Chairman Hoy then introduced the two new members', Sally Smith and Celia Roberts, to therHuman`Relations ,Commission. Correspondence to the Commission— 'Pile Commission received a letter from Ms. Beverly Woods, Department Manager, K -Mart Department Store, asking for assistance in finding membersofminority groups to apply for and possibly work in her department. The Commission recommended that Ms. Woods be sent a list of the advertising agencies the City used when posting jobs.' A member of the audience suggested that the woman also be referred to the Ebony Sisterhood, bare of Silvia Johnson on Highland Avenue. The Commission received a letter.from his. Valentina J. Jackson, Office of Research, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, D. C. This letter indicated that the EEOC had fully executed the data- ,sharing agreement between the City of Iowa City and EEOC. This agreement' entitled the City of Iowa City to receive upon request data from'EEOC's reporting system., The third item of correspondence was from the Department of Housing • and Urban Development, Marjorie E. Lenox, Equal Opportunity Specialist, affirmative action for preconstruction concerning program guidelines and;prebid conferences. The Commission asked for a report as to the page 2 • Human Relations Commission Minutes November 19, 1973 City's Position with subcontractors and their affirmative action programs. Next, Costantino referred to a notice that she had read in the paper concerning a Secretarial Conference entitled "Today's Secretary" which was to be presented by the University of Iowa. She requested a report advising who in the City would be attending this conference. Maune reported that secretaries working for the City had been advised of the conference and were urged to attend if Possible. At the next commission meeting a report would be ready as to who had attended the conference and what they felt they had benefited from the meeting. Costantino"also informed the Commission of a training session which was being presented for all City employees for the City of Cedar Rapids on Equal Employment Opportunity Guidelines. The Cedar Rapids Civil Rights Commission and Iowa Civil Rights' Commission were presenting this program ii jointly. As the training session was the.next day, Tuesday, November 20, neither Commission members or"City staff would be able,to attend due to short notice. Discussion with Director of Employee Relations on Affirmative Action Paul Ne6hauser first posed the question,t6 Smee�d as to whether or not he was acting as an EEO officer. Discussion again ensued as to whether or not:there might not be.a possible conflict of interest if the EEO officer and the Personnel officer were one person. Neuhauser indicated that the,Affirmative Action Policy passed by the City Council specified that a person be designated as an EEO officer. Don Hoy indicated that the Human Relations Commission should ask the City Council to inquire as to who had been formally designated as the City of Iowa City EEO officer. A member of the audience, Clara Olesen, offered the information that Madison, Wisconsin had a full time EEO officer for affirmative action as provided by their Affirma- tive Action Ordinance. Costantino moved that the'Commission write for a copy of Madison's Ordinance. Smeed indicated that the size of the city may make some difference as to the applicability of Madison's Ordinance to Iowa City. Hoy indicated.that we should write for a copy in any case. Smeed was question as to,whether or not his Position as acting EEO officer included the duty of monitoring Federal sub -contractors. The Chairman requested,a report on the monitoring of Federal contractors and subcontractors from individual city departments. Discussion of the EEOC Affirmative Action Report began with questions about the p art -time data. Neuhauser wanted to know why 33% of 'the black applicants for part-time positions had been hired and 60% of the white applicants had been hired. Smeed indicated that part- time record keeping had never been in existence in the City and 116 • was now in the process of extending 'the �record-keeping system for Part-time employees and applicants as well. Once more accurate data is being kept, a more accurate reflection of the City's hiring practices should emerge. Hoy indicated that the important thing to consider now was how to eliminate apparent disparity in hiring A1:1 .11 It, page, 3 • Human Relations Commission Minutes November 19, 1973 in the future so that the 60%-33% dichotomy would no longer exist. Mori Co : stantino requested that religion and creed be added to the applicant survey card. Paul Neuhauser indicated that the classification still listed things such -as Street Maintenance Man. Smeed indicated that the Classification formally read as such but, on the personnel transaction forms the names are changed. The Personnel Office is in the process of changing these classification titles. Paul Neuhauser requested a breakdown,by classification for both male and female in future reports. Mori Costantino inquired as to Police and ;Fire examinations and why no women were in the Fire Department.' Smeed indicated that 'recruitment for Police and Fire Departments began in April as tests were given once a yearand that they would be actively recruiting , women at that time. John Balmer questioned a section'of the report entitled "Features of the Iowa City Community in terms of Affirmative Action'.." Speci- fically, the part of the section which he,was most concerned about read, "Generally, a non -college oriented minority individual would not feel comfortable entering the Iowa City area for fear of further alienation." After discussion of this,nsection, Don Hoy asked whetherthe City and the Human Relations commission could find some : way to work with the minority population concerning recruitment for employment. Celia Roberts questioned Sme'ed as to his reasons for making'such a statement.After discussion she agreed with the statement. Part of the problem, she felt; was that attitudes were developed at the elementary school level. Although she realized that part of it comes from the home environment, the school system is very much a creator of attitudes such as this. I Don Hoy indicated mbers of the commission to was difficult at times for me that :it realize that such a statement could actually be true, for most of the City and members of the'Commission were quite content in Iowa couldn't understand why anyone would not want to move here. Consequent. ly, the Human Relations Commission felt that they should be concerned , with this overall problem, and until this problem is resolved, the City will continue to have,problems with Affirmative Action based on the attitudes of the Iowa City community. Concerning goals and timetables and affirmative action for women, a member of the audience asked some questions about the report. the Essentially the question facing both the city of Iowa City and Human Relations Commission is what evaluation standards shall be used -- should the City have proportiona1 representationin their representation employment in total, or should they have proportional of the community in each category of employment. ■I page.4 • HumanRelations Commission Minutes November '19,,1973,' The Commission then discussed 'both philosophical and technical aspects of goals and timetables and ,the :usefulness of such. Paul Neuhauser asked what jobs tests were being given for. Smeed indicated that pre-employment questioning or interviewing was -a form of testing that needed to be validated. He also ,indicated that he was now setting the machinery in motion for validation, first one has to have, statistics before tests can be validated.' Written tests are actually given in the clerical area, both a typing test and.a clerical aptitude test. Other than Civil Service testing this is all that the City did in the form.of formal written tests. Again, he indicated anything used in the selection' process' must be validated. Dick Braverman inquired whether the Human have some type of input into this reRelations Commission could port before it is sent to the EEOC in'.Kansas City. Costantino felt that the Commission' could better understand the report if it indicated more comprehensive data - such data would include breakdowns by pay classifications, minority status, male and female. A member of.the audience asked if the Commission, would be receptive to the idea of a public.meeting.or a public forum to discuss the question of',Iowa City community,recep - tivity to minorities and also affirmative action for women., The Commission agreed that such an open forum would probably; be -bene- ficial for them in trying to decide what can be done in these two areas.'' On a straw vote it was decided that they 'should have two separate special meetings to discuss these two 'items. Sunday, * December 2,, at 7:00 p.m, is the date for an open public meeting on affirmative' action' for women in the City government. 'Sunday, December 9, at 7:00 p.m. is the date for an open meeting on the Openness of the Iowa City community to minorities. Celia Roberts indicated ,that Trinity Episcopal Church has a social hall which. Might be available for the Commission's use to have these meetings'. (It has been confirmed that;the Trinity' Episcopal'Church'will allow the Human Relations Commission to use their lounge on both these dates at 7:00 p.m. for the 'meetings.) The Commission will also be looking into the possibility of child care facilities during these two meetings. Since the City Council was receiving this 'same information the next day, Tuesday November 20, 1973, Don Hoy indicated that the City Council may ,wish `to have a joint meeting with the Human Relations Commission to discuss affirmative action for the, City of Iowa City. -VAS UL' Kea TO Co so; - --- The School liason committee had no report as they had not yet met With th'e Superintendent of Schools or the School Board. The chairman also announced that Phil Jones would be doing the WMT "Its Your Turn" program as Dtimeon Hoy would be out of, town at the Zelenthewasteryiew wasoscheduled. btain a He also announced that Julie on November 29, the chairman wouldybeponhtheaDotty Ray Show onpe of the show. nKXIC. Paul Neuhauser indicated that he would like to have both John Hayek and Jay Honohan attend the next regular meeting of the Human Relations Commission, which would be December 17, 1973. It was moved by Paul Neuhauser and seconded by Dick Braverman to,'go into closed session for consideration of cases now in conciliation. Upon a'role call vote - Hoy, Braverman, Neuhauser, Costantino, Smith, Roberts, and Balmer voted yes. U . G . .N 11. Agenda • Planning & Zoning Commission Iowa City, Iowa November 29, 1973 4:00 p.m. Council Chambers - Civic Center A. Call to Order by Chairman B. " Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes of Preceding Meeting 1. Minutes of November 8, 1973 meeting D. Zoning Item 1. Z-7315. ',Southgate Development Company. Request for rezoning tract of land (R3B to C2) located ,on south- east corner of,Hollywood,Blvd. and Broadway. Date filed: 11/7/73: 45 -day limitation:12/22/73. E. Vacatings Requests 1. V=7308. Request for vacation of the east 10 feet of south 120 feet of Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road. Request made by Milton_ Rosenbaum and referred. to P & Z by City 'Council. Date filed: 10/30/73. 2. V-7309.' Lower West Branch Road between Rochester Avenue and Amhurst Street. Referred to P & Z by, City; Council on October 30, 1973. 3. V-7310. Vacation of portion of Macbride Road presently platted in Macbride Addition, Part 1. Request made by Macbride Addition, Inc.' Date filed: 11/13/73. F. Council Referrals 1. C-7311. Petition by residents of Kathlin Drive to change name of Mair Avenue to Kathlin Drive. Petition filed: 11/8/73. 2. Petition concerning a neighborhood park for Hollywood Manor area. Filed by William J. Schnute. Date filed: 11/5/73. 3. Petition requesting, amendment to Subdivision Code to include provision for open space for 'use .as neighbor- hood park in all new residential subdivisions. Date filed: 11/5/73. • G. Adjoprnment. STAFF REPORT Planning & Zoning Commission November, 29, 1973 SUBJECT: Z-7315. Rezoning request of Southgate Development Co. from R3B to C2 (vic. south of Hollywood Boulevard and east of Broadway Street). Date filed: 11/7/73. 45 -day limitation: 12/22/73. EXISTING The subject property consisting CONDITIONS: of part of Lot 1, Block 2 of Braverman Center Addition, is bounded on the north and east by Hollywood Boulevard and U.S. Highway 6, on the west by a Proposed office complex located in a C2 zone, and on the south by the Colony Apartments located in anR3B zone (see location map). Farther to the west,is located the K-Mart'department store and east of Hollywood Boulevard are duplexes located in an R2 zone. STAFF Zoning is probably the single ANALYSIS: most important legal device available to stabilize and preserve property values. Conversely, without 'zoning or other legal restraints there can be no assurance that land uses will not be located in such a manner as to have a deleterious effect upon incompatible land uses. Provisions for transitional uses are, therefore, needed to protect certain commercial and industrial uses from others and particularly from residential areas. Office districts are perhaps best suited to provide a transition from general business districts to residential districts because of the limited activity, hours of operation, and outdoor adver- tising associated with 'such enterprises.: Because the subject tract is located directly adjacent to a multi -family complex, it is important that the property retain its present status as an office use and that such retail businesses and personal service establishments as are permitted in the C2 zone be discouraged. It is equally important that a logical transition of homogeneous uses be established to discourage the "hodge podge" type of development. Although land lying directly to the west and contiguous to the subject parcel is zoned C2, it is be' ing developed for office use. For this reason also, it is more desirable if the subject parcel is retained in an office type district. ": Wuht`NWKVIUN: dation that the requested rezoning to C2 be denied. COMMENTS: The erroneous position taken by many cities is the attitude that residential apartments should be used to -buffer undesirable uses from singlefamily homes." Although in some cases, if properly done, apartments and, for that matter, single' family homes can be ,located near a'commercial center,, there is no reason to assume that apartment dwellers „ though they may be renters', are any less worthy of the same protection from the undesirable effects of, commercial activity as are residents of single family homes. Furtherly, as is generally the case, there are more people exposed to such conditions because of a higher permitted density of "development There is presently under construction 'a proposed office complex west of Broadway Street and south of Hollywood Boulevard. Further consideration should perhaps be given to.the establish- ment of an.Office/Transitional Zone primarily for office use as a buffer between residential and commercial uses. Such a district would logically be'located`along the west side of Broadway Street and include the subject parcel. ,, lVerOF z'!_ evGi' 2 i STAFF REPORT Planning &'Zoning Commission • November 29, 1973 SUBJECT: V-7308.- Vacation of the east 10 feet of the south 120 feet of Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road. Date filed: 10/31/73. 45 -day limitation: 12/15/73. REASON FOR Attached herewith is a letter REQUESTING submitted by Mr. William F. VACATION Sueppel on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Milton Rosenbaum, who reside on Lot 5 of ,Block J in Black's Park Addition to the City of Iowa City, requesting the vacation of the east 10 feet of the south 120 feet of Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road (see attached plat). As stated in said letter, an addition to their residence encroaches upon the platted right-of-way of Hutchinson Avenue approximately seven feet creating problems in any future sale or financing of their, property., STAFF Although there is a platted ANALYSIS: 60 foot right-of-way width dedicatedfor future access into Black's Park Addition, Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road is virtually non-existent serving merely as a common means of access to residences located at the northeast and northwest corner of`,the intersection. Since according to the Subdivision Code, ;local streets are required to have a minimum width of only 50 feet; the vacating of 10 feet would appear to be in order. Unfortunately, the right-of-way of Hutchinson Avenue south of Park Road is offset easterly 20 feet from the right-of-way north of Park Road (see cross 'section detail); the subject vacation would create an 'additional offset of five feet. Jogs at street intersections of less than 125 feet 'should 'be avoided to eliminate traffic hazards caused as a result of turning movements negotiated in crossing the intersection. Hutchinson Avenue south of Park Road presently consists of a 20 to 22 foot asphaltic paved surface. Should it be desirous to improve the street in accordance with City specifications, it is recommended as a''suitable alternative to the problem that it be constructed at a width of 22 feet back-to-back of the curb and a reverse curve be constructed near the approach to the inter- section as illustrated in the cross section detail. If and when Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road is improved, it should be located as far east in the right-of-way as practicable which would then afford a near congruous pavement alignment with Hutchinson Avenue',south of Park Drive. • It may', be noted that the petitioners are requesting vacation of the south 120, feet of Hutchinson Avenue although their property is 150 feet in depth. As was 'mentioned in the letter of -2 - request, Doctor and Mrs. Charles A. Skaugstad own the property immediately north and east of the Rosenbaum's property. 'Should they 'decide to develop 'their property; their interest is to replat Black's Park Addition and, curve Hutchinson Avenue northeasterly to avoid severe, topographical limitations (see cross section detail). To do so would necessitate the retention of the extra width right-of-way. Finally, it is suggested that if and when Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road is improved, that it be'constructed 'at a width of, 22 feet back-to-back of ',curb in order to ,provide more green space from the paved surface to the residence at the northwest corner of the intersection which has 'little or no frontyardsetback and to permit.grading adequate side slopes. For the latter reason, it is important that a construction easement be - maintained over the 10 foot by 120 foot vacated right-of-way to avoid the probable construction of small retaining walls a sizable expense: STAFF It is the Staff's recommendation RLCOMDiENDATION: that the east 10 feet.of the south 120 feet of Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road be vacated but that a construction easement be maintained over that portion of the vacated right-of- way which.is not built, upon. ` City Yof Iowa Cit MEMORANDV M DATE: October 31, 1973 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: City Council RE: Referral At the October 30th meeting of the City Council, the letter from Atty.Sueppel,requesting vacation of portion of Hutchinson Avenue was received and filed and referred to the Planning and Zoning Commission for report and recommendation. A copy of the letter is attached. W11 I IAM I. MtAllilON W11.1 IAM 1. lilt I -l -F I fill"?m N't"?WNPR JAMF M 11. 1lAV9 R I 11.1 AIR 1. HAMILTON JAM[§ O.WCARRAGW90 1110MAD J,CILCA MARK T. HAMICR Mayor Tim Brandt Civic.Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Mayor Brandt: This will be to advise you that I represent Mr. and Mrs. Milton Rosenbaum who are the owners of the following described property: Lot Five (5) in Block "J" in Black's Park Addition, Iowa City, Iowa according to the recorded plat thereof. The above described property is located on the east side of Hutchinson Avenue, north of Park Road. At one time, apparently over 20 years ago, an extension was made on the residence located on this property and apparently a portion of this extension Is located within. the 60 foot right-of-oway of Hutchinson Avenue. This matter obviously creates problems as far as the Rosenbaum's are concerned in any future sale or financing of this property. The purpose of this letter is to ask that the east 10 feet of the south 120 feet of Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road be vacated. This will leave available right-of-way, of 50 feet for the first 120 feet and for 60 feet thereafter to the north. Doctor and Mrs. Charles A. Skaugstand own the property Im- medlately north and east of our property and there is a tract • of this land which could bocomo a subdivision with accoss on to Hutchinson Avenue. i i •, Mayor Tim Brandt Page Two October 12. 1973 This letter will be to advise you that Doctor and Mrs. Skaugstad Join in this application to the City Council for a vacation of the east 10 feet of, the south 120 feet of Hutchinson Avenue north of Park Road provided that they receivewritten assurance from the planning and zoning commission and the City Council of Iowa City that any future application for a proposed subdivision of their tract of property would not be denied on the basis that the south 120 feet of the Hutchinson Avenue right-of-way is only 50 feet wide. Mr. Philip A. Leff is the attorney for Doctor and Mrs Skaugstad and Phil and I will cooperate with the City Attorney, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council in order to'expedite 'this matter. The legal description of the Skaugstad tract is as jol- lows: .Commencing 120 feet oast of the S.W. corner of Black's Park Addition to Iowa City, Iowa, according to the recorded ,plat {�reof, thence N. 170 feet, W. 120 fee as 0 feet, South 380 feet, and then' West 270 feet to the point of beginning. Also commencing 60 feet N. and 60 feet W. of the N.W. corner of Block J of said Black's Park Addition, thence E. 571 feet, thence N. 90 feet, thence W.'571'feet, thence S 90 feet to the point of beginning all being In Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa. Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, (�O William F. Sueppel s WFS:tmp 0 IF IVAIN• /, e® i :Of •;� i Yl��s 7. pWrp,"7 _ CROSS SECTION DETAIL STAFF REPORT Planning & Zoning Commission November 29, 1973 SUBJECT: V-7309. Vacation of Lower West Branch Road between Rochester Avenue and Amhurst Street. Date filed: October 30, 1973. STAFF With ,the complete reconstruction ANALYSIS: of Rochester Avenue to meet arterial street standards, the City is considering the vacation' of Lower West Branch Road between Amhurst Street and Rochester Avenue to eliminate the hazardous intersection of Lower Branch Road with Rochester Avenue. It is the City's further consideration to directly connect Amhurst Street, designed and constructed to secondary arterial street standards with a 66 foot right-of-way width and a paved surface width of 36 feet back-to-back of curb, to Rochester'Avenue and terminate Lower West 'Branch 'Road at Amhurst Street (see development plan). According to the Principles and -:Practice of Urban Planning edited by William I. Goodman and, Eric C. Freund, Professors of Planning at the University of Illinois';, streets are divided into four categories as follows: Local (residential) streets perform the function of providing access from residences to,secondary'arterial 'or collector streets which then ,feed into major arterial streets. Their secondary function is the movement of traffic as opposed to major streets. Collector and secondary arterial streetslfilter traffic from local'streets before their capacity is exceeded and then conduct it to, arterial streets. Land access should be a secondary function of a collector, and its design "and operation should reflect this fact. Local streets should not cross the collector directly nor should collectors form a continuous, system,, since there may be a tendency for traffic to use the collector as an arterial, thus violating one of the basic principles of 'residential planning to keep through traffic out. Arterial streets are designed primarily to move large volumes of traffic rather thanrovide a means of access to abutting ng property. For this reason, it is important that limited access along,such streets be encouraged; every access onto an arterial street' becomes a point of conflict with traffic movement which increases' almost geometrically with the increase in the volume of traffic. Rochester Avenue as well as Scott Boulevard are logically intended to function as major arterial streets effectuating a delineation of neighborhoods. Lower West Branch Road presently is in conflict with the above street classifications because of its function as a local, collector and arterial street -- it serves as a means, of access to adjoining residential property, collects, -2- traffic from Amhurst Street and Oberlin Street, and provides a shortcut for northwesterly bound traffic on Scott Boulevard which encourages through trafficviolating, as mentioned above, a basic principle to keep through traffic out of the neighbor- hood. By terminating West 'Branch Road at Amhurst Street, through traffic is partially discouraged from using it as an arterial street function. Amhurst Street, on the other hand, is, as ;mentioned above, designed to function as''a,collector street and should connect directly with Rochester'Avenue as the street classification system wouldindicate. Lower West Branch Road intersects with Rochester Avenue at an extremely acute angle of less than 20 degrees.' Such inter- sections should in all cases be avoided. Requiring the driver approaching the intersection on Lower West Branch Road to actually look back to view oncoming vehicles on Rochester Avenue is a definite safety hazard as, past accident reports world indicate. As the area becomes more urbanized and the volume of traffic on .Rochester Avenue'. increases, "'a traffic light, a sizable expense to the City,; would, in all probability, be needed to 'eliminate traffic accidents. Finally, the vacation of Lower West Branch Road would permit a more suitable development of, the undeveloped quadrant at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Amhurst Street as the attached layout would suggest. Basically, the layout emphasizes: limited access to Rochester Avenue by terminating local streets with turn-a-rounds creating more 'desirable lots and feeders to Amhurst Street via T-intersections. STAFF Based on the foregoing con RECOMMENDATION: elusions, it is the Staff's recommendation that Lower West Branch Road be vacated between Amhurst Street and Rochester Avenue. rt •:0 TO: City Council City of Iowa City, Iowa We,,the undersigned, residents of Iowa City, Iowa, object to the vacation of Lower West Branch Road connecting Rochester Avenue and Amherst Street in Iowa City, Iowa, and submit this ,petition herewith. SgYLE CW. (,MILLER COMPANY, INC. PHONE (319) 337.5226 • 335 KIRKWOOD AVE. • IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240 MACBRIDE ADDITION, Inc. 335 Kirkwood Avenue Iowa City, Iowa 52240 November 12, 1973 Honorable Mayor and City Council of Iowa City, Iowa Civic Center Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Gentlemen: We are developers of Macbrid'e Addition Part I and are presently working on a final plat of Part II for presentation for your approval'at a later date. To develop Part II.as proposed, it Is necessary to achieve a relocation of a portion of Macbride Road presently platted in Part 1. This relocation involves a vacation for street purposes of a small portion of existing park area in Part 1. Jay Honohan is aware of the problem and'ean explain it to your satisfaction. We respeotfully request the Council consider this vacation at your earliest convenience. Macbride Additionj Inc. will provide legal descriptions of the traots involved as soon as available,from our engineering firm. Sincerely yours, RIDE A DITIDN, Inc. W. Miller 111131-13 V- Ism r yti � I i : 1• y4 �: 1 � I a.1 ,�4 iv_ I. ri � J .. � �cr ,_r.• �: 1� J.; lf� ' � �. �:Ar< Q4Q0 �_ W !Z^ h eC r � — _ .._ r <%• � i��' :r: L'L�� i � ' 1 17 U t.1T'(. iGSEMENT\ IF NOT -W- 8i: C'U Ri a"—L`(r jam.. _�IIQ�\:I FUiZ Ifs .:e�' _ j. UZS 6U61h\V%ea%.L e.3 •'I ' 1 - '--- � -- :1 t7: Jr. 1 '• � f :.tr r�Et �1r •�' 1 �/ `: c _. ���FIAQEO p.pr f'/� =a �T�'.. G Cr: —•� �!Y.:N y' i i.. '' ,•': �11't•Q.JY �•l.,.y Wyi�-e?.�•Rhj^'15 1.� V�1/ \ >• sa \a c.LM -rJr . '.•r r .,Lti 1 11 1 � 1. J, •'.• , iV\ � /1 • � f � _ \ /: .�I �i 1. i � r— � 0 _ C f iev nyt.0 n•, rq i 1�.1:£.eC4:J Lt� � r '1 rJ . �1 I1 _Z/5 �j �, J1 I 1 �C.�•BMENT �°1.1cW►.rj �^SJ fJ , . � _ J 1 � 1 r1 ta. •' � . e � , •. �; � _ o :>� -.� 73 �;�� ,�i ,Jl.i1V'1����� �k\,.a. J� , '�Of•r,,Fl>r LEU4� 1' JJJ FROM: Iowa City City Council RE: Referral of petition.from residents of Kathlln Drive and request concerning Macbride Addition. At their meeting on November 13th; the Council officially received the petition from,, residents of Kathlin Drive to change the name of Mair Avenue to''Kathlin Drive. ^ The motion was adopted to refer the, petition to Planning and Zoning Commission for report back to the Council. Also, the letter from Lyle Miller for Macbride Addition concerning relocation of a portion of Macbride Road was referred to Planning and Zoning Commission for recommendation and report. Copies of the letter, the 'plat and the petition are attached. G% 1:I`I