HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-12-18 CorrespondenceDecember 21, 1972
Mr. ,Robert L. Welsh
Chairman,'CDIC"
2526 Mayfield Road
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Deur ;Sr. Walsh:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18, 1972
meeting officially received and placed on file your letter
concerning urban renewal'.
Thank you for bringing your views to the attention of
the City, Council.
Very truly yours,
nay S. wells
City Manager
lw{'i : Al
My name is - Richard W. Burger - President of the Iowa City Chamber of
Commerce - and I wish again to address the City Council for support of the
010 Capital Corporation Dian for the renewal of the downtown of Iowa City.
About a year ago, the lowa City City Council sought to have a local
group of people submit a plan for the re -development of downtown Iowa City.',
All information on this bid package was offered to all concerned, whether
local or not. However; the only bid package submitted was that of the Old'
Capital Development Group. There is a', lot of time, effort and money invested
in this bid package, and a group of around 90 local people are involved. I'
do believe that the Old Capital Group has fulfilled their commitment, but II
do not feel that the Iowa City City Council has fulfilled theirs by the lack,
to date, of a positive intent. All we ask is 'a general approval - or die -
approval - cin this proposal - and we ask for that answer here today!
1
Richard H. Burger
Pres.
I. C. Chamber of Commerce
December 24, 1973
Richard h. Burger
Presidaut
Iowa City Chamber of Commerce
P. 0. Box 673
Iowa City, Sona 5:3240
Dear Mr. Burger:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18, 1372
meeting officially received and placed on file your letter
concerning urban renewal.
Thank you for bringing your views to the attention of
the ,City Council,
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Wells
City Manager
;USW: alo
Tim Brandt
Mayor City of Iowa City
Civic Center
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
I Dear Tim:
The Iowa City Jaycees have announced their support of the (Old
api o Company s Urban. Renewal Proposal.) The combinationballot
and poll of our membership yielded, an overwhelming support for the
Old Capitol plan. The vote was 119 in favor -'13 opposed.
The Jaycees..urge,you to grant preliminary approval of the Project
and move ahead on workingout
necessary compromises or modifications.
We feel this is in the best interests of Iowa City.
The following is the Resolution as adopted:
WHEREAS, the successful reconstruction of
downtown Iowa City', is an expression of
vision and confidence in ,the future of Iowa City.
WHEREAS, the further delay of reconstruction
in 1973 will only add to the mounting costs
to be absorbed by the community in 'general.
WHEREAS, the Old Capitol Business Center Company
has made a viable proposal of urban' reconstruction
for down town Iowa City.
WHEREAS, the swift acceptance of said proposal
as stated, or in modified form, will speed the
economic growth of' Iowa City.,
THEREFORE, be it resolved the Iowa City
Jaycees do support the Old Capitol, project.
HOME. OF.THE-UNIVERSITY OF IOWA
December 24, 1973
Mr. Robert Ii. Walton, President
Iowa City Jaycees
P. O. Box 673
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Uoar Mr. Walton:
The Iowa City City 'Council at its December 18, 1973
meeting officially received and placed on file your letter
concerning urban renewal.
Thank you for bringing your views to the attention "of
the City Council.
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Wells
City Diana,^er
RSW:alo
DECEMBER 17, 1973
TO THE CITY COUNCIL:
I URGE YOU, TO DEFER ACTION ON THE DOWNTOWN
REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY OLD CAPITOL BUSINESS
CENTER CO.
TO 'TAKE ACTION ON THIS PORPOSALP PRIOR TO PUBLIC
DISCUSSION OF THE STAFF REPORT BY, THE COUN,IL AND THE
COMMUNITY WOULD VIOLATE 'THE PUBLIC TRUST BEHOLDEN TO YOU.
AM AWARE OF THE DECEMBER 18 DEADLINE, AND MAKE
THIS OBSERVATION: IF OLD CAPITOL US UNWILLING TO
NEGOTIATE AN EXTENSION OF THE 'DECEMBER 18 DEADLINES WHAT
GUARENTEE:_�OES'THE CITY HAVE THAT THIS ORGANIZATION WOULD
BE ANY MORE COOPERATIVE WHEN THE TIME COMES TO DO THE
NEGOTIATIONS NECESSARY TO CREATE BUILDINGS AND PLAZAS
OUT OF MODELS AND DIAGRAMS? THIS SEEMS PARTICULARLY
IMPORTANT SINCE ALL DISCUSSION OF ANY "LETTER OF 'INTENT"
COULD ONLY INDICATE COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE "CONCEPT"
OF THE PROPOSALS BUT TEMPERED WITH'A RECOGNITION
OF THE NECESSITY OF NEGOTIATING MANY SPECIFIC ITEMS.
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DICTATES THAT A COUNCIL DECISION
ON OLD CAPITOLS' PROPOSAL BE DELAYED.
THANK YOUR
I"LIG� QG�%�Cui'
liecember 4, 1973
Mr. Hick Lnrew
218 Woolf Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Ltr. Larow:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18, 1973
meeting officially received and placed on'file your letter
concerning nrban renewal.
Tir' nil you for bringing your views to the attention) of
the City Council.
Very truly yours,
Rav S. Wells
City 6ianager
RSW:ale
3'L To the members of the CitY
Council Of Iowa City • /J
I wish to present an objection frau the Executive Council of Neighborhoods
United to the passage at this time of a resolution or of other action indicating
acceptance of the Urban Renewal proposal from the Old Capitol Development Com-
pany. The Neighborhoods United zxecutive Council believes an action to accept
the proposal from Old Capitol at this time is ill advised for the following
eight reasons:
contract which Drill cost the City of `Iowa
1) The proposal is a business
City millions and will provide a'substantial profit to the investors
of old Capitol,'
2) The returns to the City of Iowa City from this contract in the form of
Ttt
an
greater shopping co enienee as well as more
a better quality of life
buciness for a group of businessmen must be evaluated against the cost
to the City of the contract,
3) The City Council of. Iowa City is the soleSrotector o: the fundamental in-
terests of the City and its citizens in these contract negotiations and
must act ht every step of the negotiations to preserve and icsu those
interests,
4) The City Staff as the agents of the City Council did not provide at the
expected early datead..quate review of even the most conspicuous part of
i the propuaal, cne underground parking `acility: when the e-::luation
was presented Chia Lwneh, Ila Council 're'jected this parkjnr feature of
tj,,a original proposalat its Dec. 7 meeting,
tion of the underground parking ramp, the
5) As a result of the rejec
original proposal is no longer before the council. Therefore, serious
consideration can be given to desired alternative, to other features
of the original proposal; such consideration both by the council and
the public requires time. A resolution or letter of intent to
accept the proposal now would remove from the city much of its power
to achieve such further modifications.
6) while the underground parking ramp has been the : only serious weakness
in the old Capitol proposal noted by the City staff, concerned
citizens of Iowa City have noted many other questionable features.
A failure to integrate closely the shopping facilities and the
City and University bus systems is one weakness:. A!failure to deal
withjthe transportation problem so as to preserve the neighborhoods
and to reduce the dependence on the automobile is another. An
indication now by the Council of acceptance even in principle of
theOld Capitol proposal could force upon the City 'features wanted
:
i :.bnl*y by the businesscz of Io-aa City.
7) in the negotiation of a contract with Old Cr-pit ! ol or any other contrdetor,
11 1 t citizens from
s United further suggests the City safeguard its Neighborhood r g e
possible failure of the contractor by arranging for an incremental transfer
of property conditional at each step upon specified prior accomplishments
by the contractor, and
8) Thzxe should be a public discussion of the comparative strengths and
weaknesses of the Old capitol proposal; to date we have had only a a ! up-
portive presentation I of this proposal largely by layor Brandt and by
members of the City Staff. A public discussion would consider alternatives
of the type rejected as inappropriate at the public presentations. Such
.st. Neighborhoods United suggests that a comparison Of
alternatives aci
such alternatives with the old capitol proposal is necessary to properly
evaluaLu —at proponal. in this process the motto of Neighborhoods
United canlp- a useful guide: Think small; Better, not bigger; Quality,
not quant"S!'--Y-
V
December 2=, 1973
Harold P. Bechtoldt
1132 Last Court Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Bochtoldt:
At its Gecomber 18; 1973 Council meeting the Iowa
City City Council received and 'placed on file your
corrospondonce regarding urban renewal.
Thank you for bringing your views to the attention
of the City Council.
Very truly ,yours,
Ray S. Molls
City Manager
RSR:alo
Old Capitol Business Center Company ,,GENE: ro�T RS
wilfroda Hieronymus, President
Route 4; Dox 279,:Iowa City, 1,,, 52240 INVESTMENT INC,
Jay Oehler, President -
December 17, 1973
Mr. John B. Klaus, Director
Department of Urban Renewal
332 'East Washington Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Re: Offer to Purchase Land
Disposition'Parcel(s)
City -University Urban Renewal Project 1
Project No. Iowa R-14
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Klaus
The offer to purchase submitted by the undersigned on
October 1S, 1973, stated in Exhibit 1 thereof that Old Capitol
Business Center Company intended to,form -a joint venture devel-
opment team with Meadow Link', Incorporated (an Indiana corporation)
a subsidiary of ;Link Programs Incorporated and with the approval
Of the City this new entity would be substituted for. Old Capitol
Business Center.'Company as the Redeveloper. On October 31, 1973,
you were notified that ;although ,it was still our intention to 'form
the joint venture this, would not be completed by November 1, 1973.
The joint venture is now ready to be formed -between Old Capitol.
Business Center Company, and Meadow Link,Incorporated and the
request is hereby formally made for authority to substitute the
joint venture under the name "Old Capitol Associates" as the
Redeveloper in place of Old Capitol Business Center Company. If
the change is authorized, a new Redeveloper's Statement for Public
Disclosure and a new Redeveloper's Statement of Qualifications and
Financial Responsibility will be filed.
i(S n Respectfully Submitted,
U DEOLD CAPITOL, BUSINESS CENTER COMPANY
Route 4, Box 279
('U j Iowa City, Iowa' 52240
an Iowa limited partnership
13y Ili Cron. Inc. (un Iowa By Investments Incorporated (an
corporation) Iowa. corporation)
I Q_>> lr a Ilieronymus sl dent Ty (.. ler, President
A, general partner A general -partner
".'
Old Capitol BusinessCentep Company • GENERAL PARTNERS
NIERON CORPORATION.
Wilfreda Hieronymus, Pruaident
'Route 4, .BOX 279, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 INVESTMENT INC.
Jay Oehler, President
December 13,"1973
Mr. John B. Klaus, Director
Department of Urban Renewal
332 East Washington,Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Re Offer to Purchase Land
Disposition Parcel(s)
City -University Urban Renewal Project 1
Project Number Iowa 014
Iowa City,'Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Klaus`:
It is agreed that the Offer to Purchase'submitted by the
undersigned on October 18, 1973, shall remain open for an
additional period of thirty ,days until 5:00 p.m. (local time)
on January -17, 1974 and shall remain in force thereafter
until withdrawn by the -Offeror in writing. This extension of
time -.is granted with theunderstanding, that the City will
immediately enter 'intw good faith negotiations with the
Offeror.in order to produce the 'formal agreeptent'between the
parties within the thiity-day period.
It is requested that the City furbish the Offeror a 007
table 'showing the dates by Which the City expects to meet the
various"legal requirements which must be satisfied before the
agreement- can be signed.
Respectfully submitted,
OLD CAPITOL BUSINESS CENTER COMPANY
Route 4, 'Box 279:'
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
An Iowa limited partnership.
By Hieron, Inc. (an Iowa By Investments Incorporated
corporation) (an Iowa corporation)
11�' da }iieronymus,s resident lay 0 Iler, Presi.c eni� t
A genill,partner A general partner
�p Company m g
GENERAL PARTNERS
Old Capitol Business Centel p y HIERON CORPORATION
Wilfreda Hieronymus, President
Iowa Cit Iona 52240 INVESTMENT INC.
I.. - Route 4, Box' 79, y. Jay Oehler, President.
December 17, 1973
Mr. John B..Klaus, Director
Department of Urban Renewal''
332 East Washington Street''
Towal City, Iowa 52240
Re: Offer to Purchase, Land
Disposition Parcel(s)
City-UniversityUrban Renewal Project,l
- Project No. Iowa R-14
Iowa', City, Iowa 52240
Dear Dlr. Klaus
The offer to purchase submitted by the undersigned on
October 13, 1973, stated in Exhibit 1 thereof that Old Capitol
Business Center Company intended to forma joint venture.devel-
opmenf'team with Meadow Link, Incorporated (an Indiana corporation)
a subsidiary of Link Programs Incorporated and with the approval
of the City this new entity, would be substituted for Old Capitol
Business' Center Company as the Redeveloper. On October 31, 1973,'
you were notified that although it was Still our intention to form
the joint venture this would not be completed by November 1, 1973.
The joint venture is now ready to be formed between Old, Capitol
Business Center Company and hleadowiLink, Incorporated and the
request is hereby formally made.for authority to substitute the
joint venture underthename "Old Capitol Associates" as the
Redeveloper in place of Old Capitol Business Center Company. If
the 'change is authorized,,a new: Redevelopers Statement for Public
Disclosure and a new Redeveloper's Statement of Qualifications and
Financial Responsibility will be filed.
U r Respectfully Submitted,
OLD CAPITOL BUSINESS CENTER COMPANY
C'CC - Route 4, Box 279
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
U an Iowa limited partnership
CifY <LER, K
By Hieron Inc. (an Iowa By Investments Incorporated (an
corporation) Iowa corporation)
BYl�e1�/��
{resi aent T ..eiler,,Presi President
A general partner A general partner
F.
•
16 0
T H E UNIVERSITY OF IOWA
.,IOWA CITY, IOWA 52242 s1=
Office of ilia President December 18, 1973
The Honorable Mayor and
!City Council Members
City of Iowa City
Civic:Center
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
t
leter setting forth the University
Oil November 21, 1973, sent 't10 you a 4
D -po3al submitted by the Old1 Pro
reactions to the Urban Renewal evelopmen I
Capitol Business Center Company as they affect the University.
You are now in the process of considering modifications to that proposal
and I believe it appropriate that I again comment on the plan because of the
changes you are considering which affect the University. my comments are
limited to impressions received from a copy of the staff -prepared document
"Review of Offer to Purchase and Redevelop Land" and the most recent public
discussions by the Council of this document.
Our impression is that the general.theme of chaiiges proposed for the Old
Capitol Business Center proposal have to do with parking. Specifically,
they, are directed at providing approximately 500 parking spaces that cannot
ended in the developers' proposal. The
be provided in structures recommended to be to place that parking
staff's proposed solution to this dilemma appears
on the streets of downtown Iowa City. This position, if adopted, will have
ntinually
a severe negative impact on the University as it affects our co
stated objective of a'pedestrian-oriented campus.
As a specific result of this proposed sol ution, the City Staff has questioned
whether Madison Street -between Iowa Avenue and Burlington Street can be
closed. On page 38 of the Staff review it is stated:
As a result of the proposal : for on -street parking, it is desir-
able to keep Madison Street open to general traffic between Burlington
and Market. it would be desirable to consider the construction of
pedestrian overpasses across Madison at the University Library as well
as the Memorial Union if Madison Is left open to traffic.
The Honorable Mayor and
City Council Members
December 18, 1973
Page 2
This statement is diametrically opposed to the repeated requests of the
Universityregarding Madison Street, and would constitute the desecration
of the Pentacrest,' long a'cplace of great public beauty and one of the unique
features of this community. I have made these points about Madison and the
neod for a pedestrian campus at virtually every City-University meeting,)
have attended during my tenure as president.
Other portions of the review, point up the need to keep downtown streets', open
to two-way traffic with curb parking. A statement on page 16, point 4,
questions whether the plan for closing the intersection of Dubuque and Col-
lege Streets for the purpose of constructing 'a mall can be carried out.
If the latter-O scussed changes are carried out; it is difficult to follow
Under the developers'
the reasoning which prompts the comment on Madison:Street.
pi)posal, which contemplated the closure to private vehicles of Madison
Street, Dubuque Street and Capitol Street were also to have been closed and
Clinton Street was to be reduced in functional capacity. With the'modifi-
cations proposedby the Staff, it would seem that the necessity for Madison
Street is lessened rather ,than increased, when compared with the developers'
proposals.
Other aspects of the response on perking would seem to force continued use
of South Capitol, College between Capitol and Madison and Washington between
Clinton and Madison for both traffic and parking.
We cannot overemphasize our position that we find these proposals to be
imate interests of the University,' and we
completely at odds with the legit
cannot concur in these changes.' Their net effect is to "solve" a central
business district problem at the expense of the University.
At this point it may be appropriate for me.to call to the attention of the
Council three statements from the list of objectives that have been adopted
as a part oC the Urban Renewal Program. They are shown in Appendix l of
-the review document. They are:
g. To provide a safe, efficient and attractive circulation system which
miniinizes conflicts between different forms of traffic such as
pedestrians, automobiles, transit and service vehicles.
I. To provide for off-street parking facilities;in locations easily
accessible from major thoroughfares and central area destinations
alike, including long-term parking facilities, on the periphery of
the central area.
k. To aid the University of Iowa to expand in an orderly way, so the
University ana the Business District can each: perform its own
function with minimum' conflict and mutual benefit.
The Honorable May and
City Council Members
December 18, 1973
Page 3
Vhilr. the Staff has recognized the apparent need to reconsider objective
i, -the other two objectives have been lost in the efforts to accommodate
the developers' proposal and requirements as we'understand them.
I would be remiss in my responsibility *not to suggest other alternatives
to the apparent direction of the Council, policy on the parking matter., One
obvious possibility, which seems not ;to have been addressed publicly,is to
cut back the parking to be provided to the point where on -street parking is
not a continuednecessity. -Would the 500'spaces make that much difference?
Could they not be provided later in structures if the need really develops?
Has the developer been approached with this alternative? This suggestion
seems appropriate, particularly in light of the energy crisis.
The Council stands today on the brink of,a momentous decision ,that will,
for good o'r bad, affect the future of the Community and inescapably the
University for many years to come., I urge you, in the strongest teimseparable
sible, not to sacrifice the interests o the University,
ich from the interests of the Community„ as you reach this decision.
Sine iy yours,
lii'lard L oy`
December 2.1, 1973
Willard L. Floyd
Office of the President'
The university of Iowa
101 Jessup Hall
Iowa City, Iowa 52.1.40
Dear President Loyd:
The Iowa City City', Council at its December 18, 1973
meeting officially received and placed on file your letter
concerning urban renewal in Iowa City.
hank you for bringing your comments to the attention
of the City Council.
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Molls
City ,,manager
11211: alo
i
December 24, 1973
Mr. David Baldus
127 Grand Avenue Court
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Baldus:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18, 1973
moeting officially received and placed on file your letter
concerning urban renewal:
Thank you for bringing your views to the attention of
the City Council:
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Wells
City Manager
RSW:alo
i
December 24, 1973
Mrs. Robert T. Soper,
50J Melrose Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa 53220
Dear firs. Soper:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 16, 1972
meeting officially received and placed on file your letter
concerning urban renewal.
Thank you for bringing your views to the attention of
the City C6uncil.
Very truly yours,
Ray S. 1ie11:
To: Members of the Iowa City Council I
I am very disturbed to see that the City Council is reacting so
hastily and, I believe, so unwisely to the virtual ultimatum given by the
Old Capitol Business Center Co. I attended on the the Council -sponsored
neighborhood meetings in which the proponents of this Old Capitol plan,
attempted to convince the public of the merits of the plan.Neither at
this meeting, nor at other meetings from which -I receive reports from
friends who had attended; was there manifested any uncritical and enthusi-
astic support for this plan. One of the most frequent criticisms was,
that it is a plan suitable for the past, not the future. It is a, plan,.
presupposing unlimited automobile traffic and unlimited energy resources.
Automobile traffic is actually' encouraged to the downtown area from
greater Iowa City, Coralville, and more distant areas, by the widening of
roads, the presence of a conference center, and the greatly expanded park-
ing facilities:
Surely it must be obvious to the Council that, in a decades time
(the period over which' this development will be built), this country will
no longer be able to maintain the life style which is so wasteful of energy
resources. Nowhere in the list of conditions for acceptance, did I read of:
building requirements designed so that energy resources
would not be wasted;
integration, of an expanded mass transit system and
= limitation on the cost borne by the city, and thus
the taxpayers, for the support of private investors.
I believe that the City Council, in its haste to appease business
interests, is about to buy a "pig in a poke". This is a heavy future burden
to place on the backs of the taxpayers of this city, I support downtown
redevelopment, but the City Council must seriouslv consider its responsibilities
i
December 29, 1973
Ms. Anne P. Autor',
Pall
421 Melrose Avenue
Iowa City; IoNva 52'1246
Dour Ms. Autor:
The Iowa City
City Council
at its
December 18, 1972
meeting officially
rec&&ved and
placed
on file your letter
concerning urban ronewal.
Thank you for
brir.."ing your
views
to the attention of
the City Council.
Very
truly yours,
Ray S. (Sells
City
Manager
RSV7 : alo
November 28, 1973
Mr. R. El. Jeter
Plamor Lanes
1555 - 1st Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Jeter:
The policy of the Iowa City Council for new establish,
ments opeiing & adding Sunday beer sales, is to request,'
after three months, a statementwhich supports their appli-
cation statement that the sale of goods & services other'
than alcoholic' liquor or beer does constitute 50% or more
of the gross receipts from the licensed premises.
May we have your statement covering the previous three
months, so we can make a report to the Council that your
establishment still qualifies for the Sunday permit.
Yours Very Truly,
Abbie Stolfus
City Clerk
R,
TBLEPHOM. N 293-7300
(AREA conE 202).
MAYORS
OF
UNITED STATES CONFERENCE 0-c
1 6 2 0 EYE STREET, NORTHWEST
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006
December 7, 1973
JqEPH LA�M i
M.mThe Honorable C. L. Brandt
Mayor', of Iowa City
City Hall
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
JAIR M %I'VELE"'
Dear Mayor:
T C_ B - M.I., P.M. :,We are enclosing a statement for the dues of. your city for
the year 1974.
K111M. A. DIMS
NLi'o.% ... 1 1 1973 has not been an easy year for those working to improve
�S K G. I... :It has been impossible
the operation of our governmental system.
-to focusthe attention of Federal officials either in the adminis-
RIOoi, G. mtct,'. ms and opportunities for urban
W", tration or in the congress on problems
America.
.Much of the promise of New Federalism, whereby the national
government, the states, and the cities do those things at each of
e
their levels that they are best capable of doing, is still inth--w
concept form. As originally articulated by the President, the Ne
U, Am'.D.E conc,
M"olh— the reordering of national
BE% K�' Federalism promised progress toward
M'Paw.h
R..C.TB 11111,E.111. priorities. But t this promise has been lost in the details, and Uie
30.1.4 J. Rum" congress has refused to move until the administration more clearly
)LIM a %�' M..
commits itself on this priorities question.
In 1974 we will see another year of drift if not worse unless
Be.T..L. F. GULVIwin the discussions
e in the cities become a str6ng3r participant
MOT. 5, and debates:which must be stimulated. To this end the officers of
W, 4 N' the Conference have pledged our total resources.
Penrscr Lm..
IILM 11 Iron
M" 4 R.�' UI invite your active participation.
1, I have pledged myself
R,Emo G. L.;. to make this a Conference of Mayors not only representative of
en medium size cities, but of all cities over
large cities or even
30,000. The staff, operating under, my direct orders, has taken
LI -11C M1. steps to assure that all of our efforts take into accounts the
R,, n11. P,.. needs and views of a11 of our members. We need your help.
Sincerely,
IIAIX�'. TAWLF& I&
m.,
IY5
IJ, TuLL1. .
G UIL_.A�
Wb' 0 �„k Roy B. Martin,
TtD C WILLI President
Conservation
se
ry
1
Co
n
t
f
Soil me'
n
0
- Depart..:
Grimes State Office Building I Des Moines, Iowa 50319
•! Telephone: (515) 281;5851
William H. Greiner, Director
December 10, 1973
Mr. C. L. Brandt, 'Mayor
City Hall
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Mr. R.1 J. Brannaman,Chairman
Johnson County S.C.D.
510 Highland Avenue
Iowa City,, Iowa 52240
Gentlemen:,
I am happy to inform you that the members of the State
Soil Conservation Committee at their regular monthly meeting
on December 6, 1973, approved the Ralston Creek Watershed
Application for Assistance in Planning and Carrying Out Works
of ,Improvement under the Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention tion Act,Pub11c
Law 566.
The members of 'the committee were very much impressed with,
the work accomplished in the watershed as well as the cooperation
that exists between the city of 'Iowa City and the Johnson County_
Soil Conservation District. They noted with Interest that;, the
district has devoted 30 percent of its _state 'soil conservation
cost -;sharing, funds_ to the Ralston Creek Watershed area.
I am -also happy to inform you the committee took action to
request the 'Soil Conservation Service to begin planning this
watershed' immediately. In other words, a planning priority was
given to the watershed the same day it was approved. The
committee has never, taken this:kind of action on any watershed
in the state, and there have been over one hundred applications
submitted thus far: They felt, however, the urgency of this
Situation dictated that such action be taken.
We are sending a copy of the watershed application to the
Johnson County Soil Conservation District. This is the distri'ct's
_copy and has been signed,by Donald Johnson, chairman, State Soil
Conservation Committee. -If the city would like a copy for its
files, >we'would be happy to Xerox a copy and send it or, perhaps,
this 'could be done locally.
State Soil Conservation Commillec'.Memben
`.Donald Johnson, Fairfield,!). Thomas Kenny, Akron ' George Annan,. Clarinda Walter Hagen, Waterville --Gerald Norland, Cylinder
Chairman Vice Chairman Sherry R. Fisher,. Des Moines Carroll). Hobson, Eldora Robert R, Welp, Ft. Dodge
I
Dir, William 11. Greiner
Director'
Department of Soil Conservation
Grimes State Office Building
Des Moines, Iowa 50310
Dear 1dr. Greiuer
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18, 1073
L:eeting officially received and placed on 'file your
correspondence informing the Council that the State Soil
Conservation Coraittee had approved the Ralston Creek
Watershed application for assistance in planning and
carrying out works of improvement.The Council appreciates
the planning priority which was given to the watershed the
same day it was approved.
Thank you for bringing this encouraging news to the
attention of the City Council_
itsW: alo
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Wells
City Manager
.k T
I^ i
�• CIVIC CENTER. 410 E WASHINGTON ST.
• IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240
319.754.1000
December 13, 1973
The mayor and City Council
Civic Center
City of Iowa City
Iowa City, Iowa, 52240
Dear Councilmembers:,
At our regular Commission meeting last evening, December 12, a
subcommittee report on, procedures for clarifying Parks and
Recreation Commission - City Council relationshipdrafdt is
attached.
action was
presented. A copy of'the preliminary
attached.
was taken, the Commission feels it
Although no official action
be made prior to your December 18
imperative that some input
ittee of the Council will make its
meeting when the Rules Comm
report to the Council.
This preliminary draft will provide the framework for a revised
set of by-laws
whichlpresented Commission
t our
Januarmeetg.Itemsto beconsiderred includespecific aduties
of Commission
with regard to budget recommendations and
and review, internal proceduralmethods and the management,needs
of the Commission':
Respectfully yours,
me R eegiers; C irman
owa City Parks & Recreation Com.
JR:alo
Attachment
SUB-64-MMIT-TEE REPORT ON:
PROCEDURES FOR CLARIFYING PARKS AND RECREATION
Cr;MMISSInN-CITY COUNCIL INTERACTION
These by-laws I are an attempt to alleviate these current
confusions:
1. haphazard scheduling of Council consideration of
Commission recommendations
2.Ao clear procedures for Commission to present its thinking
directiv to Council and to rebut Staff if there's disagreement
3. not hearing Staff's thinkingif they disagree and kill a
Commission recommendation
ie.Swartzendruber request for a
neighborhood basketball court
A) July 11,1973 - Commission recommiended
that way (possibly through leasing)
be found to set up this project
B) August 8,1973,Commission Agenda - "Council
Actions: Swartzendruber request to staff"
C) ()ctober 10, 1973 Commission Agenda
YCouncil Action: Rejected Swartzendruber use
of South Lucas lot for basketball." We were
never informed of Staff's thinking which
might be applicable in future requests.
BY-LAWS
I. Current confusion seems to exist about certain provisions
(especially budget considerations) in the City Code description
of Parks and Recreation Commission duties as ,stated in
Duties. This should be clarified.
Chapter 3.34 -Section l; #D,
II. Procedures 'for handling Commission recommendations:.
1. All motions made by Commission to Council,
must be voted upon by Council.
2. Councilmust' give consideration to or vote on,
When necessary,, each Commission motion within 3 weeks from
when it is made.
3. If Council refers a Commission motion back to
_Staff, without a vote, and Staff disagrees with the motion,
'Staff is to bring the matter ;back to Commission for further
discussion. Commission can change its original motion or be
Prepared to rebut the Staff position when the matter is brought,
back to the Council for final voting.
Commission's enabling machinery:
a) Tentative Council agendas to be sent immediately
to Commission Chairman.
b) A permanent time slot in the formal Council
meetings to be established for consideration of Commission'
business.
c) Commission .Chairman to have a representative at
Council meetings, whenever we have business before the, Council
;procedure to be established by Chairman ie. monthly rotation
or by interest)
III.', Procedures for Commission's' Budget input:
According to City Code, Chapter 3.34 -Section 1, $D, "Commission
shall recommend and, review... budgets relating to parks, playgrounds,
recreational centers and cultural functions of the City of Iowa City,
Iowa,. and make such reports to the City Council as the Commission'
deems in the Public Interest."
Commission's enabling machinery:
a) Ample notice of budget' preparation by the Staff
is to be given to Commission.
b) Commission Chairman and/or a designated sub -committee
will have the right to review all background data and figures
pertaining to the Parks and Recreation budgets.
BY-LAWS cont.pg.'3
c) Commission or sub-committee to meet with City Manager
and City Finance Director in anticipation of all budget presentations..
IV. Management of Commission business:
l.Commission to be assigned a top levelsecretary (ie. Arletta Ctelup)
2. Commission minutes to be 'dispersed to council and Commission
within a week of each meeting.
3. Secretarial help including copying to be available to
Chairman and designated sub-committees,
4, Minutes of Commission and reports from sub-committees to
include estimates of time spent discussing each subject.
5. Commission members to be given separate` copies of a
reasonably sized, up-to-date City map with parks designated.
Periodic 'on-site visits to be 'available.
Sub-committee report prepared by,
June Davis - Chairman
Sarah FoX
Orrin Marx
December 104, 197:,
James Roe'giers, Chairman'
Iowa City Parks & Recreation
Com.
2309 Tudor Drive
IOWA City, IOWa.J22 40''
Dear Mr, Roegiers:
The Iowa City City Council at
its December 18,1973
meeting officially received
and placed on file your
correspondence concerning procedures
for clarifying
couunission and Council relationships.
Thank you for bringing your
views to the attentien
ofboth the City Council and
the Council's Rules
Committee.
Very truly yours,
'I
Ray S. 17ells
City Manager
RSW:alo
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
December 13, 1973
To: Mayor of Iowa City
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Subject: Notice of Revisions to Gas Rate Schedules
Notice is hereby given that on November 29,
1973; we filed with the Iowa State Commerce Commission
proposed increases in gas rates, scheduled to become
effective January 26, 1974.
Very truly yours,
D. R. Stichnoth
Vice President and
Secretary
DRS:nb
POST OFFICE, BOX 4350, 206 EAST SECOND STREET, DAVENPORT, IOWA 52808 319.3264100
1
December 13, 1973
To: Mayor of',Iowa City
IowaCity, Iowan' 52240
Subject: Notice of Revisions to Electric Rate Schedules
Notice is hereby given that on November 29,
1973, we filed with the 'Iowa State Commerce Commission
proposed increases'in electric rates, scheduled to',
become effective January 26, 1974.
Very truly yours,
D. R. Stichnoth
Vice President and
Secretary
POST OFFICE BOX. 4350, 206 EAST SECOND STREET, DAVENPORT, f IO%VA 520DO 319.326.7100 -
December 24, 1973
'sir. D. It. Stichnoth
Vice President p. Secretary
Iowa -Illinois Gas & Electric Company
p. G. Fox A350
Davenport,,Iowa 52808
Lear Mr. Stichnoth:
At its December 15, 1973 Council ujoeting the Iowa
City City Council officially received and placed on file
the correspondence givint; notice of revisions to both
the gas rate schedules anis the electric rate shhodules.
Thank you for bringing this matter to the attention
of the City Council.
Very truly yours,
nay S. siclls
City Manager
G..)lne,Vl4i 11uub lbnl:lJ. ,. .., .. ........_ •---_ - - -. ,. -..... - "r
specified :in the Old Capitol proposal and'has nlread✓ informally re�nctcd at least.
thi�t--part:,of•.the:contrxt, offering the,alternativc instead of,,providingparking
sp pp University Mall; also on the ground adjoining.
nces,on,,u or leveln of the
Additional'-time is needed:to renegociato>'this'part of'the'pioposal alone
3.`.Sincethe Old Capitol Company,proposal' was, submitted; an intornation'al enorpy
crisis 'hns suddenly _become the U S. national prooccunation. As ,a result,
s . • i;
(a) gasoline and oil' consumption must be curtailed drnstiCally, with motor '
vehicle and airplane use;'; reduced; r
As laesently conceived, the University Mall would be patronized principally
by automobil.i:-driven cusLomers,.and iL would be'serviecd-by trucks . This was"
of'c'urso the rationalization for'the Purlington Street widening, and,the
nett,at:ep will be!to•onlarge the arLerinl streets such a.•Aielrono, Benton, Muzeatine,
Park,Rond; and Co' SLs., L� improvo access to the downtown shop
;in-
Once hazing t;oLton the cars downtown, they then insist:on parking space
in the Mall itself, not even across the streo'. on Burlington, nInce they, want
tlt1L packae:: of land for%condominicns selling for an Average of $37,500."
_ (110 .ponder ho'� choice..that. package of land will: be with all the trurks hvrl;lir>g " 1,
UP and down Burl.ingLon!
)
Apparent
11 U.D.; in Omahas, has receivod no revised regulations'yet
pertaining to restricted ;iutomobils and energyuse, but they cautioned our.
�, two weck�hegotirainsL�'3rBo elopmont of parking facilities.
InlL•hisisamo�veip--, while pp rd recently uphold the legality,
of the proposed financing of parking ramps, th=,,y advised the Council to go slow
on parking ramps: We, should not commit tho' City to additional future ramps.
(b) electricity and natural gas must to censor✓ed,' with reductions in heating,
air-condiL-ioning, lighting, nnd' ndvstri, usaalo
h'e.fnvor enthusiastically the const;rsction of the University Mall at the
ptopooed'locaition, but the proposed revered mall will reyviro,much more energy
for treating, air-conditioning, and ventilating than an-.uaicovered large rectangle
with protective overhangs and an open court. it:will also require more time and
more construction materials Lo build. We need to negotiate with Old Capitol
on this'.also.
(c) There is Alrendy talk of at least a mild recession with necompanying
unemployment.,) It would make sense to plan a,:less expensive; leas
i
December 24, 1073
Dorothy E. Bachtoldt
1152 East Court Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear ids. Beebtoldt:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18,• 1973
meeting officially reci'eved and placed on file your letter
concerning urban renewal.
Thank you for bringing your views to the attention of
the City Council:
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Wells
City Manager
RSW: ILlo
r
16 December 1973
City Council
Iowa City
Iowa
Dear Members of City Council,
I a , m writing to express my cr,ncernl about the City Council's
I
deliberations over the Old Capitol Business Centar Company's
proposed redevelopment of our downtown urban renewal area.
I was disappointed to 'Learn of the unreasonably: expensive under—
ground Dari-ing facility proposed by the Old Capitol group, but I'
am,alarmed to read of their refusal to consider, the Clinton Street
U
site as a parking area and most of all their refusal to hold open
their redevelopment proposal past Tuesday, December 18. Such
pressure is surely not in the best interests of Iowa City.
I recognize that the city Council is in a tight` situation, but I
'fee'L that',the parking facilities are too important a matter to be
rushed, especially considering current enery shortageb and their
impact on future transportation possibilities and needs.
D6spite Old Capitol's ultimatums I urge you City leaders to find
a way to put off the parking facilities decision until adequate
and thorough review of proposals and alternatives can be made.
Good luck.
Sincerely
i> LXJ'� CIIA-1
Susan'J Shawhan
1147 East Court
Iowa City
December 21, 1973
Susan J. Shawhan
1142 Bast Court
Iowa City, Iowa 82240
Dear Ms. Shawhan:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18, 1973
meeting officially received and placed on file your ',letter
concerning urban renewal.
Thank you for bringing your views to the attontion of
the City Council.
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Wells
City Manager
11815: alo
December 24, 173
Ms. Fran Bullard
110' s. Dubuque Street
4
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear :ds. Bullard:
The IoNva City City Council
at its
December 13, 1973
meeting officially reciwed and
placed
on file your letter
concerning urban renewal.
Thank you for bringiuo your
views
to the attention of
the City Council.
Very
truly yours,
itay S. 1Yells
City
Manager
ASW:alo
December 24, 1970
Ms. Susan M. Jaeeques
1106 north Dubuque
Iowa City, Iowa 522210
Dear Lis. Jaecques:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 1973
ineetinS officially received and placed on file your corres-
pondence concerning urban renewal.
Thank you for bringing your views !to the attention
of the City ,Council.
Very truly yours,
Ray S. Wells
City Managor
' 11S1i : alo
December 21, 1973
ILr. Toll Mikelson
Unitarian Universalist Society
lU South Gilbert at Iowa Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa'52240
Dear Mr. Mikelson:
The Iowa City City Council at its December 18, 1973
meeting officially received and 'placed on file your cor-
respondence relating your resignation from the housing
Commission. The City Council regretfully accepts your
resignation from the Housing Commission and thanks you
for the time you have ded&cated thus far:
Very truly your;;,
Ray S. Wells
City Manager
RSN:alo
YEK & HAYEK AREA CODE m9
HA
HAYEK, 337.9606
ATTORNEYS AT LAWILW
IIO EAST WASHINGTON STREET
joH .
J. HA CITY.
'OHN'W; HAY EK IOWA 52240 -IOWA '.
C. PETER HAYEK 973
1
December 13, O JJ
City Council of low City
Iowa City Civic Center
Iowa 52240
Iowa City,
Re: Conflict of Interest Questions in Connection with Urban Renewal
Disposition
Honorable Mayor and Council Nlembers: Special
Counsel
You have requested an opinion from rnY
office as Sp
ect to questions which have been submitted
conflicts of interest between certain
for Urban Renewalavith resotential Capitol Business Center
to the Council concerningyOwn an interest in Old
persons who own'or may give you
the results of my
Compat1Y and who arhisllet erTis intended t ogi e Y nches of the Iowa
City government. 'r
review of this question.
Following my receipt of your request for review of these issues
the identities of persons who own
I requested further inform! concernangarifi.cation from Old
o Io pa. City. in
Business Center Comp Y', and who also serve t1973,t1 received a
an interest iri That companyty On November 5,an in response to my
some governmental cap our more
letter from Old Capitol Business Center Company
letter
f r A copy of that letter is attached hereto for y
req
convenient reference. per
who have
V, are a great number of p
As you can see, er who also serve o Ho`yever,
rospective redevelop of Iowa City.
ani interest in the p Mr Tom Wegman who is
boards, commissions and the like of the City
specific q Review Committee ;anNusser
question the
has been raised concerning
a member of the Urban Renewal Design Review Committee.
Urban Renewal Project Area COMM"
Designs William G.
who is a member of the Urban
eview Committee were formally ce on
A check of the City records indicates that neither the Project
Alt into
Area Committee nor the Design Council in order that the input of citizens
established by ordinance or resolution but were broug
a more in basis by the City
-2- December emb
er
13
1973
City >Council of Iowa City
in the community into the Urban Renewal process could be obtained. It
should also perhaps be noted that the role of ,the Project Area Committee
is somewhat different from that of the Design Review Committee in that
the Project Area Committee was specifically intended, as far as I can
determine, to serve as a mechanism by which persons directly affected by
urban Renewal could have an influence on the planning and execution of the
project. The Design Review Committee was intended in a more advisory
capacity to review redevelopment proposals and make recommendations
to the ',Council from a design, planning, and aesthetic point of view.
Chapter 403 of the 1973 Code of Iowa is the provision of the Iowa
Code dealing with Urban Renewal. Section 403.16 of the Code of Iowa is
the statute which deals specifically with the questions of conflict of
interest by public officials in connection with the execution of Urban
Renewal projects. Under that section no official of: thty oincluded Cito
who owns an interest as defined in the statute in any property.
to be included in the project shall participate in "any action" by the muni-
cipality, or board or commission thereof, affecting such property.;. Sub
tes that ownership of less than 5% of the
section 5 of that section indica
outstanding stock of a corporation having an interest in Urban Renewal
propel;ty shall not be deemed to constitute an ownership interest under
"Theword 'action' shall
this statute. Subsection 6 provides as follows, '
not be deemed to include resolutions advisory to the local governing
body or, agency by any citizens' group, board, body, or commission
designated to serve a purely advisory approving or recommending function
mxlc, this chapter."
In my opinion both the Design Review Committee and the Project
Area Committee serve a purely advisory or recommending function and
tees is excl:aded by the provision of Sub -
membership in those commitsection 6 of Section 403. 16 quoted above and hence doe not constitute a
conflict of interest. Thereforei I do ..ot ')elieve that the fact that Mr.
4Vegman and A4r. Nusser own small interests in the redeveloper, in both
cases substantially less than a 516 interest, would serve to disqualify them
from membership on these two committees.
It is, however, true that Section 403. 16 of the Code of Iowa does
uestions involved because the Iowa Supreme
not completely answer the q
Court has consistently held that there are certain general common law
principles against, conflicts of interest by public officials which are
apparently in addition to the specific statutory principles set down in
Stiction 403. 16. See Wilson v. Iowa City,' 165 N. W. 2d 813, 822 (Iowa,
1969). While the status of. Mr. Nusser and Air. Wegman under these more
I � �
City Council of Iowa City
3 December 13, 1973
ber
general commay disquaaliflif
on law principles is less clear I do not think that the mem
ship of these gentlemen on these two committees would in any wy
any action taken by the City Council with respect to this development
proposal., The functions of the Project Area Committee and Design Review
n nature and neither
Coniniittee are, as discussed above, purely' advisory i
Mr. Nusser nor Mr. Wegman are in a position to take any definitive action
s redevelopment proposal: Of course also the City
with respect to thi
Council, which must itself make the final decision with respect to the.
is now informed concerning the membership of
redevelopment proposal,
these two committees.
also been raised concerning the adequacy of the
A question has
disclosure statements, filed by the Old Capitol Business Center Company
with its proposal. It would appear tothe disclosure me that the letter November
1973, supplies sufficient additional information to make t
comply with Federal regulations. It appears to me that any failure to
disclose these names in the original disclosure statement a an a result of
the disclosure
a good faith difference of interpretation of certain language -
form rather than anything else.
To summarize; my opinion is as follows:
1. MemUership by Mr. Tom Wegman and Mr. William G.
Nurser on the 'Design Review Committee and Project Area
Committee does not constitute a violation of Section 403. 16 of the
1973 Code of Iowa and does not constitute a conflict of interest as
defined by that statute.
2. The question of common lawlrules concerning conflict
of interest is less clear, but in my opinion the membership of
Mr. Wegman and Mr. Nusser on these committees does not
constitute such a conflict of interest as would disqualify the actions
taken by these committees which are purely in the form of recom-
mendations to the. City Council.
3. Full disclosure by the redeveloper has now been made
and the City Council may receive the recommendations of the
Project Area Committee and the Design Review Commlroet iate.
and
give those recoinmendations such weight as seems app p'
Respectfully submitted,
Jol W. ayek
I W I-I:vU
Enclosure
• GENERAL PARTNERS
HIERON CORPORATION
old Capitol Business CenterCompaqv Wilfr . ads Hieronymus, President
INVESTMENT INC.
ja Oehler, President
Route 4, Box 279, Iowa City, Iowa 1 52240 Y
November 5, 1973
Mr. John W. Hayek
Ha�ek, Hayek & Hayek
Attorneys at Law
110 East Washington street
Iowa City, Iowa : 52240 Capitol Business Center companficy
Re: Old C� ement of Qualiations
Redeveloper's Stat
and Financial Responsibility,
Dear Mr. Hayek:
-response to your request
written in
This letter is, being pitol Business
for more information ormation about the investors in old Ca I ed
Each of your,requests for information is stat
Center company.
below,
followed by our responses:3 1 The names of any persons who have any interest,
in the redeveloper who occupy any
or indirect, ff-icial of the City Of
direct e or public 0 A informal'
position as employe M
City, including boards and commissions an
Iowa C lie City Council,
specifically,
cojmittees,establislied by t Project Area Committee and
ing the Urban Renewal Pm
includ 1 Design Review Board.
the Urban Renewa position
Name
Commission
Member, Airport COMM's
David Hartwig Commission
Summerwill Member, Airport Committee
11. R. Member, Area Social Concerns
Lloyd F. Burger Member, Board of Housing Appeals
Max D. Selzer Member, Board of Review
James w.' Pearson 'Review
Member) Board of Re)
Gene A. Schlaegel Civil Service Commission
jqilliam G. Nusser Member,ber, Civil Service Commission
Mem
Mark J. Thompson Housing Commission
Member,
Donald Duncan Member, Housing Commission,
ission
Clement Frimml Member, Human Relations COMM
John Balmer Chairmaliuman Relations Commission
Donald He)' Member, Library Board
Ronald Farber
Dir. John Wi Hayek
November S, 1973
Page 2'
Name
Position
James Sangster
Member, Parks and Recreation. Commission
James Galiher
Member, Planning $ Zoning Commission
Nancy Sciberling
Member, Project Green 'Fund 'Commission
Earl Murphy
Member, Riverfront Commission
Tom Wegman
Member, Urban Renewal Design Review
Committee
William G. Nusser
Member, Urban Renewal Design Review
Committee
Thomas Wegman,'
Member, Project Area 'Committee ;
John Dane
Member, Johnson County Regional
Planning Commission
Roland Smith
Member, Johnson County Regional
Planning Commission
2. The names of
any such persons whose immediate
Family, and by immediate
family I mean spouse, and children,
own any interest in the
redeveloper.
Name
Position
MTS. Joyce Summerwill
Member, Urban Renewal Design Review
(W.'R.)
Committee
Richard Pedderson
Member, Project Area Committee
(Ann)
Claude Peterson
Member, Airport Commission
(Joanne)
Mrs. Linda Bywater
Member, Library Board
(Willis)
Mrs. Vivian Buchan
Member, Library Board
(Warren),
Mrs. Virginia Hebert
Member, Parks and Recreation Commission
(lion)
Mrs. Joan Buxton
Member, Parks and, Recreation Commission
(Richard)
Les Moore (James S.)
_Member, Project Area Committee
William Gauger
Member, Board of Examiners :for
(Carole G.)
Plumbers
3. - The names: of
any such persons as defined in Para-
graph 1'above who own
a controlling interest in any corpora-
tion or partnership
having any interest in tile redeveloper.
For the purposes of
this question controlling intel•est
should he taken to mean
>a 5010 or greater ownership interest.
David Hartwig
Lloyd P. Burger
Max D. Selzer
Roland Smith
Mr. John W. Hayek
November 5 1973
Page 3
4. The nature and extent of the ownership of
Mr. William Nusser and Mr. Thomas Wegman in the
redeveloper.
(a) William G. Nusser owns; 600 sharos of the
"common `stock 'of Ile the People, Inc. There are 52,200
shares of Ile the People,: Inc. stock issued anu out-
standing. ,The 600 'shares owned by Willi -in G.'Nusser
represents 1/87 interest in We the People, Inc. Ile
the People, Inc. as a limited partner owns 9,1a of Old
Capitol Business CenterCompany.; The ownership of
William G. Nusser in Old Capitol Business Center
Company ,'is less than 11/100 of one percen,.'
Thomas Ile man owns 600 shares of>the common
stock (of Ile the People, Inc. The 600 shares of Ile the
People;, Inc. stock owned by Thomas'Wegman represents a
1/87' interest in Ile the People, Inc. The ,ownership of
Thomas'':Wegman in Old Capitol Business Center Company
is less than 11/100 of one percent.
Responses we have made herein are true and correct to the
best of our knowledge and belief.
Old Capitol Business Center Company
Route 4;' Box 279
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
An Iowa:limited partnership
By Hieron Inc. (an. Iowa corporation)
A111
r a Hieronymus, Pr ai e
A General Partner.
By Investments Incorporated (an Iowa'
corporation)
By
ayOeilfiler, President
A General Partner
v I n
• yy y
}�1
i"t e3 (3I2) ,922.3200
r�
O icago, Bock island and Pacific Railroad 901Pp19nY
1]9 WEST VAN. SUREN STREET L< CHICAGO. ILLINOIS e0005
CRELLER CHICAGO - December 179 1973
'GC. W
• IC[M9 M[lR
File 102053-4
cc 102053-42
pM SORANDUa
Delivery of materials, including signal devices it the
1st Avenue of April.
z,�ll delay start of the work until the latter P the
grade crossing project
However, the delay until. April in starting the or
crossing work is in no way
fault of the Rock Island.
The Rock Island can well understand the disappointment of those who use 1st
Avenue, and it regrets that the,City Attorney did not send the Railroad Timely advice
ro ressed its plans for relocating .lst lete itseessentiaHad h advances been dplanning
as -the City p- S,
would have been possible for the F.aimuchd a comp
work and ordering of materials at a much earlier date. information
The following outlines the difficulty Rock Island has had getting
and documents from the City: Y^�
ti. _ tw 1St %, — .... .. — ....
would be in 1973; J -
17 that
(b) ,d rL
hock Island had to remind Iowar it c ossintzr locr on ationtznd eaten?tofaeasement
ceived
b
no official notification concerning g „ould require
desired by City, and City was also advise? City estlestimates whichnCityd-before
Railroad engineers could be assigned to draw up
with formal Agreement;
(n)
but no legal drs crap -
City's re location,pla-)s received in Chicago on August 21,
tion of easement was included; but no legal description
(d) Or. October 8, City, Resolution received by Rock Island,
of easement was included;'
(e) On October 24,,Rock Island draw up and forward illissiOn
zd to Iowa woval byce mCon^ission;
proposed plans, for changes in signals at crossing for necessary P
(f) On October 3l, City Attorney was remindedby
letter. to send '.Legaldescr'..ption
of easement desired by City for inclusion in Agreement;
(g) On Nove>yer 30, ro reply having been received from City, Attorney to requests
of Aug thoug'r.t was de,i•r`ad by City in respect
August 17 and October 31 requesting legal description or easement desi_ed,
Island drafted Agreemant
containing what
with cost estimate for crossing project;
of casement and fo)rc•rarded Agreement tcg
(l)) On December 17, `a new Agreement, revised w remove an arbiguily in Article II,
was sent to City Attorney of Iowa City.
(Continued on page 2)
December 18, 1973
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE IOWA CITY COUNCIL:
Through forward-looking legislation in recent years, the Iowa
City Council has adapted:to many new community needs and realities
of the times. The Council has been far more responsive to citizen
.interests than some of its critics would have people believe, and
I think a comparison of the composite records of all the city, councils
in Iowa would prove it.
As one citizen, I urge the Council not to over -react to the or-
ganized pressures you willi continue to beer.
In a democratic community, it is inevitable that a very small
percentage of the Populace will wield the greatest influence over
the city council. Those citizens not only care about the policies
they favor, but they make policy -change their extra -curricular busi-
ness. Further, they understand practical Politics. They know how
to make s.wheel scueek
in order that the Council is persuaded to
apply grease. Along with',so many other endowments, Iowa City is rich
in its increment of wheel-'squeekers;and they,8re getting better or-
ganiz6d all the time. Now"adays,they are joining forces in pursuit
of their various community interests. They have come to represent a
solid core of continuing criticism of the Iowa City Council and the
city staff.
I'm convinced that alicity council cannot satisfy its critics.
At best, it can only exchange one brand Of criticism for another.
The Council can set its formal meeting times at any hour of the day
or night and I'm quite sure that critics will find it possible'to
attend. I doubt, that, many others will be in attendance, other than
�the petitioners of, the - moment.,
But the Council represents al those other people, too -_ those
thousands upon thousands Of Iowa Citians who heven't,been criticizing
the City Council. They represent the overwhelminp, majority,of,the
citizens of Iowa City. They pay the overwhelming share of the, local
taxes we've been budgeting and spending. They elect councilmen to
represent their citizen interests, and 3 don't think they went to feel
that they have to get down to City Hall on a weekly basis, to keep the
I I
Council aware of its obligations to them. To a considerable degree!
they are apathetic about Iowa City government and about the Council's
problems, and that is unfortunate. but somehow, they also retain a!
great measure of faith in a system in which th- policy-mnkers are named
in free elections, to legislate for the whole community. I think the
classic obligation of any city council is not to undermine the faith
in local government which still is displayed by the creat body of our
citizens.
The next Council will reflect some new thrusts and some stronger
emphases in city Policy-making. I do not resist that reality in the
slightest. It is as it should be. The transition in Council philosophy
.y) ji :: ✓ l r iIC" tt 1.�r7l,
J:
• • -2-
has occurred grauuslly, over three city elections. The trend has been
consistent and unmistakable. The new Council consensus can be ,very
good for Iowa City, so lonq�_as no counci
this city out of darkness.l member is bemused by the:
inference that he or she was named personally to deed the people of
'
New directions for a complex community have to evolve. They cannot
be instituted in a single day, or year. In the light of which a council
has to have'a great deal more patience than its constituents are apt to
have about new priorities and broadened programs.
to reflect that patience. I urge the Council
YOU face. It will be the most difficult continuing task
There is an exhileration __ I have experienced it __ in savoring the
fact that 3,600, or 4,200, or 4,500 voters pulled the lever over your
tionaln the lest election. But there's a sobering influence in _the add'
tional fact that only 25% of the city's registered voters went to the
polls in that election, and the total voterscwho cast ballots represen
ted only 159 of the city's population. Who represents the other 8595 in
government et the local level, if every member of the council does,not
do so?
As you face a new year end a new appr
take the long view -- of yourselvesoach, I urge the Council to
, and of this city.
Times do indeed change - I can tell You how quickly. y
my earll
years on the Council, some very vocal critics castigated me In In a wild-
eyed liberal, bent on abandoning some of the most sacred,precepts of
Americanism, even to the Point of condemning one man's property for the
Ultimate use and benefit, of another. In'these later years, I've been
Pigeon -holed among the most moss -backed of conservatives, intent on pre-
serving social anachronisms at any cost„ even to the point of assuming
that some manner of four -wheeled vehicle which travels about on streets
and roadways will survive the fossil -fuels crisis.
If you serve on the Council long enough, the same kind of thing can
happen to you. Which suggests that any city council ought to be wary of
those who cite immediate and contemporary conditions as justification for
the actions they urge you to take. Their honesty is not in question: But
they may be extremely narrow in their perspective of this cgs, and of this
city.
Many of the same people who urge you to act only in the light of,a
long-range plan will be among those who will urge you to abandon this or
that element of the same plan,'once it is before you. (I think this will
be especially true of that celebrated area_ transportation study, if indeed
it ever reaches you at all; and I can only hope that it will'not even men -
term the term "arterial street," for the sake of the Council's collective
sanity.)
A long -ranee plan is useless 'unless its central goals are achieved
in a timely way, whatever modifications may have to be made along the way.
During the past twenty years, the student body of the University has grown
from 7,000 to, 20,000, with corresponding growth in the faculty and staff.
In that time span, more than $120 million in University capital Construc-
tion has accommodated the growing programs and chanced the face of the
41 r"I", .....
• -3-
campus. Has that overall dcvc.1cp.-..cnt bean good for Iowa City? I think
so.r Admittedly, if the growth had been stymied by effective opposi-
tion, many of the Council's present critics probably would not now be
living in this community. But in the broader view, without the Uni-
versity's recent growth, there would be no lows Center for the Arts
in Iowa City, nor would the current prospect exist for the stature:
of the University's west campus as a major regional medical and
health services center.
The point is that a cood many long-range plans have been carried
out on the campus, over many years and by succeeding administrations,
despite the obstacles of opposition. I suggest.the City Council take'
a leaf from the University's book in the area of long-range pl,
them anning.I
of preserving the central goals of plans, and of seeing through � 1
with solid and continuing support at the top level. Only in that way,
I think, Asn the Council justify this city's faith in its own future.
It is the City Council which must be the firatt reflection of the city's
faith.
Of other pieces of gratuitous advice I might offer you, I give you
only one more: get out and stay out of the business of administering
various city programs, no matter how bard some citizens may try to push
you into administration. Make whatever policies a consensus of the
Council will support, but leave their implementation -- without inter-
minable second-guessing -- to the manager end the most competent staff
of city department heads and employees I think this city ever has had'!
You will have a gres't'deal more time for your own important work by`I
confining your labors,to policy-making. if the Council's policies are
sound, and if you authorize the indispensible administrative budget
support, the manager and staff will make the Council look,good. In,
the last analysis, in the present and in the forthcoming new charter
form of government, it takes an able and dedicated:staff'to make a
council look good. The Iowa City manager and staff deserve far more
credit, far more defense, and far more support from the City Council
then they've received in recent years.
Yours sincere y,
Loren Hickerson
618 Brown Street
December 18, 1973
10 THE MEMBERS OF THE IO1dA CITY COUNCIL:
Through forward-looking legislation in recent year::, the Iowa
City 'Council hen 'adopted to many new community needs and realities
of the times. The Council has been far- more responsive to citizen
interests than some of its critics would have peoole'believe, and
I',think a comparison of the composite records of all the city councils
in Iowa would prove it.
As one citizen, I -urge the 'Council not to over -react to the or-
ganized pressures you will continue to b-ar.
In a democratic community, it is inevitable that a very small
percentage of the populace will wield the greatest influence over,
the city council.- Those citizens not only care about the policies
they.fevor, out'they make policy -change 'their extra -curricular busi-
ness. Further, l they understand practical politics. They know how'
to make a wheel';scueek', in order that the Council is persuaded to
apply grease. Along with so many other endowments, Iowa City is rich
in its increment of wheel-sque'ekers;and`they are getting better or-
ganized all the,time. °Nowadays .they, ,are joining forces in pursuit
of their various community interests., They have come to represent a
solid core of continuing criticism of the Iowa City Council and the
city staff.
I'm convinced that a city 'council cannot satisfy its critics.
At best„ it can only exchance one brand of criticism for another.
The 'Council can set its formal meeting times at any hour of the day'
or night and I'm quite sure that critics will find it 'possible to
attend. I doubt that many others will be in attendance, other than
the petitioners of the moment.
But the Council represents.allthose other people, too -- those
thousands anon thousands of Icwe'C ltier.s who haven't been criticizing
the City Council'. They represent the overwhelming majority of the
citizens of'lows',City. They p3y,the overwhelming share of the local',
taxes we've been,budceting and spending. They elect'councilmen to
reoresent their citizen interests, and I don't think they ,want to feel
that they havetoget down to City Hall on a weekly, basis,to keep the
Council aware of its obligations to them. To a considerable degree
they are apathetic about lIowa 'City government and about the Council's
problems, and that is unfortunate, but somehow, they also retain o
"great measure of faith in a system in which the policy -makers are named
in free elections, to legislateforthe whole community. 1 think the
classic obligation of any city council is not to undermine the faith'
in local government which still is displayed by the great body of our
citizens.
The next Council will reflect some new thrusts and some stronger
emphases in city policy-making. I do not resist that reality in the
slightest. It is as it should be. The transition in Council philosophy
has occurred gradually, over three city elections The trend hes been
consistent and unmistakable. Tho new Council consensus can be very
good for Ionia City, so long as no council member is bemused by the
amed personally to load the people of
inference that he or she was n
this city out of darkness.
Net: directions for a complex'eommunity have to evolve. They cannot
be instituted in a single day, or year. In the light of ,which e council
has to hove c greet deal more patiencethen its constituents arc apt to
have about now priorities and broadened programs. 111rce the Council
to reflect that patience. It will be the most difficult continuing task
you f ace .
There is an exhileration -- I have experienced it -- in savoring the
fact that 3,600, or 4,2.00, or 4,500 voters pulled the lever over your
name in the last election.- But there's a sob._ring',influcace,in the addi-
tional fact that only 25% of the city's registe edvoters went to the
polls in that ',election, and the total voters who cost ballots represen-
tcd only 15y of the city's population.' Who represents the other 85;x, in
government et'the local level, if; every 'member of the council does not
do so?
As you face a new year and anew approach, I urge the Council to
take the long view -- of yourselves, end of this, city.
Times do indeed change -- Lean tell you how quickly. In my early
tics castigated me
years on the Council, some very,'property
f
vocal Cr'crice a wild-
eyed liberal; bent on abandoning some of the most sacreforthe
Americanism, even to the, point of condemning one man's p p y
ultimate use and benefit of another. In these later years,,Iive been
pigeon.-holed among the most moss-backed of conservatives, intent on pre-
serving social ,anachronisms ;at any COS-,, even to the point of assuming
.four-wheeled vehicle which travels about on streets
that some manner of
and roadways .will survive the fossil-fuels crisis.
If you serve on the Council long enough, the ame kind of thing can
happen to you. Which suggests that any cit. council ought to be wary of
those who cite immediate and contemporary conditions as justification question. for
the 'actions they urge you to take. Their honesty is not in question. But
they may be-extremely narrow in their perspective of this age, and of this
city.
Many of the same jeople who urge you to act only in the ;light of a
long-range plan will be among those who will urge you to abandon this
that element of the same plan, once it is before you. (I chink this will
be especially true of that celebrated area-transportation study, if indeed
it ever reaches you at all; and !,con only hope that it will not even men-
tion the term "arterial street," for the sake of the Council's collective
sanity.)
- A lone,-range elan is useless unless its central gook arc achieved
along the way.
in e(timely way, whatever modifications may have to be mode
Dux^_ag the past twenty years, the student body of the University has grown
from;7,000 to 20,000, with corresponding growth in the faculty and staff.
In that time span, more than $120 million in University capital construe-
tion has accommodated the growing programs and changed the, face of the
us.
coml-jHas that overall: development been, good for lowo City? I think
SO. Admittedly, if the growth had been stymied by effective,opposi-
tion, many of the Council's present critics probably would not now be
living in this community.: But in the broader view, without the Uni-
versity's recent growth, there would be,'no Iowa Center for the Arts
in Iowa City, nor would the current! prospect exist for the stature
of the University's west cam pus as I a major Jor regional medical and
health services center.
The point is that a cood many long-range plans have been carried
out on the campus, over mciny years and by succeeding administrations,
despite tho obstacles of opposition. I suggest the City Council take
a leaf from the University's book in the area of long-range planning,
of preserving the central goals of plans, and of seeing them through
with solid and continuing support at the top level. only in that way,
I think, can the Council justify this city's faith in its own future.
It is the City Council which must be the first reflection of1the city's
faith.
Of other pieces of gratuitous�odvice I might offer you, 1 give you
only one more; . get out and stay out of the business: of e6iinistaring
various city programs, no matter how herd some citizens may try to push
you into ndministration. ?4ske whatever policies a consensus of the
Council will support, but.leave their implementation -- without inter-
minable second -guessing: --'to the monager and the:most'compotent staff
of city department heads and employees :I think this city ever has had.
You will have a great deal more time for y0 ur own important work by
:
confining your labors to policy -making.. -If
the Council's policies are
sound, and if you authorize the indispensible administrative budget
support, the manager and staff willmvkc the Council I..)ok good. In
the last analysis, in the present and in the forthcoming new charter
forn',of governmenti it takes an able and dedicated staff to make a.
council look good. The Iowa City manager and staff deserve for more
credit, for more defense, and far more support from the City Council
than they've received in recent years.
Yours sincerely,
Loren Hickerson
618 Brown Street
FEDERAL INFORMATION
EXCHANGE SYSTEM
COUNTY SUMMARIES -'AGENCY OPERATIONS
..
F4ul"
Ann
P104UkTON
IT TIN
(UNIT
DPhil
CON
ONW
FOREST PROTECTION & UTILIZATION FS .... a
ITLL9
'.
OEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVCLO►WNT
NATIONAL WOO( ACI PAYMENTS... ....
.. -_-
170,4)7
$19,70
INIwmO m 1101141 AcmmitS•
MORTGAGE INSURANCE ......... -- (5$7,0001
RESEAL STORAGE ................................. ..........:.......
RIVER BASIN SURVEYS AND INVESTIGATIONS ........ ---
SIMS
HOME
INSURANCE FOR PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT LOANS ._....... _. _ 1317,0001
RURAL (NVIRONMENIAE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.... ---_-
___
S67,2I5
$69,573'
,DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
SB E. ASCS..........
S 6 f, RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ADM.................... ............ .... -_
$25,77 ,
DNML HINDS _ - .315.001
GRANTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE - -
SOIL AND WAI[R CONSERVATION.. •• • ---
SOLI SURVEY PROGRAM .... ....••..•••• ,_
$79.;91
515.97)
AGENCY TOTAL . FIDIRAL FUNDS ........ ..._._..
LI5,001
STORAGE FACILITY LOANS ............. ....i.
PREVENTION OPERATIONS -
6 FLOODPLANNING
U17,517
$1.677
- --
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -
WATERSHED
WATERSHED PIANHING ••••••••
HNIM IUNOt$14367
,570,719
'- AGENCY TOTAL FEDIRAL FUNDS ......... ..
$f,/71,111
htOlA-INSTIIUIIONAI (RAINING •••. "' '
PLACEMENT SERVICES -ADMINISTRATION...... ---
.-__
$16.759
1FInwNc1 a 1101IAamnls
OF COMMODITIES TO SCHOOLS (SEC 6) °
1677&1!
UNEMPEOYMENI INSURANCE. ................................_...:_......
f01,71L -.
DONATION
FARM OPERATING LOANS ......••• _
. AGENCY IOTA( . FEDERAL FUNDS ............. ..............:.....
FARM OWNERSHIP LOANS............ .... ._
($S7.770)
EPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT
FOOD DISTRIBUTION TO INSTITUTIONS 11 _
($7,141
1360.1761
nHUL FUNDS
GUARD MARINE. HARBOR 6 SHORE SVC • ---
5576'
FOOD DISTRIBUTION TO SCHOOLS. to_
LOW 10 MODERATE INCOME HOUSING LOANS ..-.--
117&.6901
COAST
HIGHWAY PLANNING ANDCONSTRUCTION.......................... __
$57,251 ,,..
RURAL ELECTRIC LOANS............... ........: + --
($981,755)
I$40E001
' ,AGENCY TOTAL . FEDERAL FUNDS ..............__..............
$57,790. ',
RURAL TELEPHONE LOANS ......... ......... ••...... ---
.. .
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
DEPARTMENT OF COMMEECE
"-
nmm IUMOS
TILL PUBLIC DEBT &'SAVINGS BOND ON ---
$776
FIDFWI FUNDS ..
-CENSUS AND STATISTICAL REPORTS -
-
$1,261 '..
SM
ADM
FISCAL ASSISTANCE TO STATE &LOCAL GOVTS -- -
$732367
$847,836
ACADEMY --
'
INTEREST ON IIiF PUBLIC DEBT .:................. . Is--• '.
AGENCY TOTAL - FEDERAL FUNDS.................................51.6T7
AGENCY TOTAL - FIDIRAL IUNDS...._....... .... •. $1,(77.949
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ",.
'•'
FINIAL FUNDS '� S._•','
CIVIL FUNCTIONS PRIME CONTRACTS
5163.0.7) -,
nNul FUNDS
.ANNUITIES UNDER SPECIAL ACTS, CSC.......: +__
$17
$197,1$5
CIVILIAN PAY............................• l+ __
n._
$216.000
$•148.CCO
CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT 6 DISABILITY FUND .._._.. ...... 1._
8$7,157 '
MILITARY ACTIVE DOTY PAY ..:::..........
PRIME ROTE CONTRACTS •• +.--
$438(tl
.._......._. ...
AGLNCI TOTAL- FEDERAL FUNDS....... ..
., MILITARY + -.
MILITARY PRIME SERVICE CONTRACTS ••
$438 (w
$53 DLO
GENERAL SERVICES ADAUNISTEATION
MILITARY PRIME SUPPLY CONTRACTS..... .. + _
MILITARY RESERVE AND NATIONAL GUARD PAY .••.0 _ _
3635.0.3
nNuL IUNDf
BUILDINGS MANAGEMENT FUND....... .. ••••
5705
-.MILITARY RETIRED PAY a--
$135.(0)
$7,($7,000
". AGENCY TOTAL- FIDIRAL FUNDS.L...:..:.:.. ....
'.305
- AGENCY Tot • FEDERAL FUNDS.................................
POSTAL SERVICE -:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
.
nNUl1UN01
SHF POSTAI IUND...............................................•• ---
$575.770
FINIAL FUNDS ..
AGIHG•SPECIAI SUPPORT PROTECTS
$9.778
$2tl1,9W
". AGINCr TOTAL • Ilo[RAl FUNDS..... •--• ........
$515,730'.
ALLERGY b INFECT F-SRE IAL IM GRANTS::..... ---•
HEALTH PROF -SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT GRA ._-._
5117.557
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD I.
ALLIED
ALLIED FILTH PROFESS SPECIAL PROTECT GRANTS •• ---
$60.M
$49.555
-
ALLIED HLIH PROFESS IRAINEESHIP.GRANtSADV _
,
379.600
'
FINIAL
SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR RR WORKERS ............ n._
5165.818'
.........................
ANIMAL RESOURCES ...... "'_
--
-
' $179.278
AGENCY TOTAL • SIGMAS FUNDS ............... .«.__.......:d
!165,94
ARTHRITIS 6 METAB OISFASFF(ILOWSFUPS.....
6 METAB DISEASE.GRAD TRAIN GRANT ........
$(55.690
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
ARTHRITIS
ARTHRITIS 6 METAB DISEAS6RESEARQI GRANTS ................. --
$770,580
519,078
nmul FUNDS
510,079
BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES SUPPORT GRANTS...:.... -"
$16,220
IENNFSSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FUND ..... -•-
BIOTECHNOLOGY RESOURCES .:........................: --
.
$57.612 r
AGENCY IOl7l .F[ DFRAI &NOS.:.......:. .. ......
S10,N9
r �_
CANCER NINO...:.......................:
'
S4$1,940
CANCERRESEARCH GRANTS..... •••• --
RESEARCH GR
579.611
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
CHILD HEAT FORCE .......:.:..... ....
&5$6.736
rtwullU IC
DEP[ND[NCY A INDEMNITY 6 DEATH COMPENSATIO............. n..__
$$4477
CHILD HEALTH 6 HUMAN OEVEL EVIL -TRAINING GRANTS ..._.
61 $79
.
SONS, DAUGHTERS. WIVES 6 WIDOWS EDUCATION........ u -
n
72. 0'1
372.751
CHILD WELFARE SERVICES.:.... •••-• " .
TEACHER GRADUATE FELLOWSHIPS... .. .$761,625
.VETERANS DEATH PENSION ...... _............_.......
VETERANS DISABILITYCOMPENSATION ........................... n -
$118.700
COLLEGE ••.
COMP PUBLIC HIiH SERVICES FORMULA GRANTS -._..
$197.900
VETERANS DISABILITY PENSION .............. a
$115.5m
344,873CRIPPLED
- COMPREHENSIVE SOC REIIAB.TRAINING .. .-..._
n
$758,779
$1,1$9.010
..
VETERANS INSURANCE AND INDEMNITIES . u._--
IS—
$1$7.745'
,•„
.• ....
59.000
VETERANS READJUSTMENT TRAINING ..................:
PMT........: 11
55,908DENTAL
CUBAN EDUCATION $ UDENIELOANS
ISIHPSGINNI3...••..
$540.110
VETS BURIAL AWARDS 6 OTHER ,VSISC BENEF
$27.815
VETS. R[IIAO; TRAINING FOR DISABLED VETS ........................ U.__
:56,14$
f607,175.
_
O[NTAI R[ [IARC Id LIFO
........
•
$$51.907
AGENCY TOTAL -11DIRAL FUNDS._ ..............................
DENIAL RESEARCII GRANTS.:. ....
R[SCARCI6IRAIN114G GRANTS .....
.. 351.075
INF1UINCIN nNul 1t11VDllf __--
'VETERANS GUARANTEED AND INSUR(O LOANS .......... -
(56).7.10)
DENIAL
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABIL-DEMOHSIN {ACIL &IRA _
DISABLED -BASIC SUPPORT
-.. _, f$355822
-
COUNTY TOTAL • 1IDIRAl FUNDS.. ...:...........:
514,195.751
DEVELOPMENTAIEY
DISEASE C014TROL•RESEARCH GRANTS.......... --
-375000
$2.100
1'
.
COUNTY -JOHNSON
... -_
DRUG EPR( EDUCATION ..:...............AGENCTES.' --
[DUC DEPRIVED
SIt0,578
S78247
'
NERAL E (P OJITS CT) RESEARCH
[DUC R 8 D- GENERAL [D (PROJECT) RESEARCII ---
5211.741
DEPARTMENT Of AGRICULTURE
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANTS ....................
_.._
$7500(1
'"Nut LANDS'
^^• ••••
FOOD STRAW BONUS COUPONS '
'5629'881
375.872
EYE RESEARCIIT[LLOWSHIPS
CYE R[SEARCII$6FARC11 GRANTS
-.
- 1114.078
$90.1:0
NONFOOD ASSISTANCE 10 SCHOOLS PROGRAM.........' a - .
$27,274
EYE R[SFARCICIRAINING GRANAS
$717.751
PAYMENTS 10 STATES FOR SCHOOL MILK ..................... a
$12$,521
GRANTS ••.••••.•
(ARCIII
_
$57.706
SCIIOOI IUNCII PROGRAM (CASA PAYMENTS) ....................... u �
u.'
110,7$1
GRANTSNG
FOOD R(RFAMILY .......•••'•,••••••••:•, -.,-
.......................... _._._ 55285
SPECIAL FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM TOR CHILDREN........
U'
$7,716
FOOD RESEARCH 1RAIIUNG GRANTS
$576.917
ADM, A OPER, E%P., FCD: CROP INS, CORP ...................
AGRICULTURAL A RURAL ECONOMIC RESEARCH [RS .:.. a
$
GENERAL CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTERS...............................
GENERAL MCD SCIENCESd(LLDWSHIPS.................................
GRANTS.........................---
$79S
$1,349.4A4
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH - BASIC 9 APPLIED ....
-.
$27.606'
GENERA( MED SCIENCES -RESEARCH
- $287,516
COMMODITYINVENTORYOPERATIONS..
$(,089,490
- GENERAL MED SCICN(ESiRAINING GRANTS
•..-
$167,776
COMMODITY LOANS :i ...................:.:....: .:..
$27,675
" GENERAL RESEARCH SUPPORT GRANTS . ...
": $181.549
•
COOPERATIVE f%TENSION SERVICE, AGRICULTURE +F
CROP INSURANCE INDEMNITY PAYMENTS FCIC ' 1+ _
$1698],
HANDICAPPED TEACHER EDUCATION •:
HEALTH FACILITIES CONSTRUCTION GRANTS
-- $551.46)
241,595
'.. CROPLAND ADJUSTMENT PROGRAM ....... :........_......... .... _•..
$200/7
$3.108.619
HEALTH INSUR FOR AGFDIHOS%TAT INSURANCE........
_• $1
FEED GRAINS PRODUCTION STABIIIZA110N.................: ..... _.._
44
FEDERAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE SYSTEM
L
COUN `S1 SUMMARMS - AGENCY OPERATIONS
FRM
CON
OUIRAY
com
OUTIAT
i,IAITH INSUR FOR AGED-SUPPIAM MID INSURANC .............. . .....
$337.971
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ................................................ .. . ....
563.268
AMIN MANPOWER ..................................... . ...................... ........ .
$744.486
AGINCY TOTAL - HDERAL FUNDS................. ................
$164,S26
:4ALTH MANPOWER EDUCATION INITIATIVE AWARD ............
$706,128
6666
:4ALTH PROFESSIONS CAPITATION GRANTS...._ ....................
$2,035.361
DEPARTMENT Of STATE
AAtTH PROFESSIONS SCHOLARSHIPS .................................... .....
$109.3115
HNIAL FUNDS
:4ANTH PROFESSIONS STUDENT LOANS ................... .............. .. ......
$516.435
INTERNATIONAL CONFIRCINCIS & CONTINGENCIES. ...... N.
$1.842
,,(ALTH PROFESSIONS-SPICIAt PROJECTS....:.................... .... .......
$577.757
MUTUAL ED. & CULTURAL EXCHANGE ACTIVITIES ................. . .....
$61.337
4ALTH SERV RESEARCH & DIV GRANTS & CONTRA
S22.0013
.............
[ART & LUNG DESCH FELLOWSHIPS ............•• . .. ......
$80.595
AGENCYTOTAL - FIDIRAL FUNDS .................................
$63,179
HART & LUNG RESCH GRAU TRAINING GRANTS ..................
$252,187
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
HART & LUNG PESCH RESEARCH GRANTS..:. :....
5871.195
I
FINVUL FUNDS
4AR1 & LUNG 0.ESCH-SPECIAtI2[D RESEARCH CN ........... ---
$678.138
COAST GUARD MARINE, HARBOR & SHORE SVC.... ................ .. . .....
$2013
AGHER ED ACADEMIC FACIL CONSTR-INTEREST ..................... ----
$6.856
HIGHWAY PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION ............................
$374.413
NGHER ED PERS DEViL-INSI,SHORT-IERM TRAIN .............
$30.000
...
MGHER EDUCATION ... ........................................ . .. .............
SI.9114
AGENCY TOTAL - FFOIRAL FUNDS ........ .........................
$374,621
HCHER EDUCATION PERSONNEL FELLOWSHIPS ........ .............
$58.500
TREASURY DEPARTMENT
HGHER EDUCATION WORK-STUDY ................. . ...... .... . ....
$.417.149
FINIAL FUNDS
JOHN I FOGARTY CENTER ADV STUDY IILTH SCI .... .............
$10.000
i ADM THE PUBLIC DEBI & SAVINGS BOND DIV
$2.851
.MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH SERVICES ......... . ........ .............
$-117.776
. ..................... ........
FISCAL ASSISTANCE TO STATE & LOCAL GOUTS....
$1.295.045
MATERNAL & CHILD HfAtTH MINING ......... . . ....................
4105481
1 ................
INTEREST ON THE PUBLIC DEBT I .
$3,774.250
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM .... ..................................
$276,870
j ............................................. ......
YINTAL HEALTH .... .......
.... **"'* .... . . ....
$157.792
AGENCY TOTAL - FEDERAL FUNDS ....... ..........................
SS,072,146 p
MENTAL HEALIH-FtEia�EW&iAwiS
$285.298
ACTION
MENIAL HLIH TRAINING GRANTS .... * ...
$467.351
NATIONAL CANCER INSIITUII.� ................ ..........
$I.Om
RETIRE
NATIONAL HEART AND IUNG INSTITUTE ......... . .....................
S303
RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM ... 6 .................... 6 ....... . ....... .
$16.574
NAIL DEFENSE STUDENT LOAN CANCELIATIONS-....; ...
$20.620
AGENCY TOTAL - FIGURAL FUNDS ................... 44 ...........
116,524
NAIL DEFENSE STUDENT LOANS ...... .......... --..; .............
$1.559.541
NfURCI DISEASE & SIROKE-IELLOWSIIIPS664.4 . . . . ...............
SN6250
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
NEURO DISEASE & SIROKE-GRAD TRAINING GRANT ............. 4.
$3501903
HDINAL FUNDS
NIURO DISEASE & STROKE RESEARCH GRANTS .....................
$1.486.555
CONTROLLED THERMONUCLEAR RESEARCH ....... . .... 66 .............
$50.000
NURSING OCCUPATIONS GRANTS ............. 4 ... 6 . ............ 4� ......
$167220
1 PHYSICAL RESEARCH PROGRAM6.6.6.66 ................... 6 .... ............ ...
$50.ODO
::
NURSING RESEARCH PROJECT GRANTS....::_.. ...................... .
$228:423
AGENCY TOTAL'- FIDERAL FUNDS .................................
S I DO,000
NURSING SCHOLARSHIPS ............................ 6 ........ . �;6 ..........
$31863
NURSING STUDENT LOANS ................ 6 ................. . . ; ............
$79:530
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
PROFESSIONAL NURSE IIAINIIIHIPS .........
$87.1 1 9
'"N-1 I UNIT
PROFESSIONAL PUB HEALTH PERSONNEL-TRAINTES ..............
S3,797
ANNUITIES UNDER SPECIAL ACTS, CSC ............6..... .... r. _..
$61
PUBLIC ASSIST-MAINT[NANCt ASSIST (STATE Al- ........ 6..;..::
$139.184
CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT & DISABILITY FUND ..................
$9115,725
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE -SOCIAL SERVICES..........' ........ .............. Is---
$125.876
AGENCY TOTAL - FEDERAL FUNDS .............................
5913.786
PUBLIC ASSISIANCI-STATF & LOCAL TRAINING ...... ......... ...
$7,082
1
RIGIONAt MID FROG OPERATIONAL & PLAN GRANT ............ :
$477.219
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYr.
tFKAB SERVICES & FACILITIES BASIC SUPPORT .... 6 ................
$59,787
limut FUNDS
RESCH&DEV CONTRACIS-D(NIAt RESEARCH. . ...................
$42.000
ABATEMENT AND COUTROL. EPA... ............................. 6 .........
WS4,500
RISCH&DEV CONTRACTS HEART 1. LUNG INSTITUTE .... 6 ...... 6.:
$520,000
OPERATIONS. RISEk:CH. & FACILITIES, EPA ......... 6.6 .. ............ . .......
$13.643
RESCH&DEV CONTRACTS NAIL CANCER INSTITUTE ....... 6 ......
$110.287
SOLID WASTE TRAINING GRANTS..........................................
$15,000
RISCH&DEV CONTR.CIS-NAIt FYI INSTITUTE .......................
$55,706
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL TRAINING GRANTS ...................
$54,947,
SCHOOL ASSIST III TED AF1fCTEO AREAS-MAINI& .................
$143,193
AGENCY TOTAL: rimAt FUNDS
$338,090
SERVICE & SUPPLY FUND, NIH ..... 44.6 ...... 4 ....... ...................... ---
$652
.................................
SOCIAL SECURITY-DISABRITY INSURANCE..::. 6 .......................
$7146011
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
SOCIAL SECURITY-RETIRIMEnt INSURANCE ...::........6...6......4.4
$7,560.208
FIDIRAL FUNDS
SOCIAL SECURITY -SURVIVORS INSURA14CE ..... _6 ................ 4 ... ....
$2.165,508
BUILDINGS MANAGEMENT FUND... 4 ...................................... ... ....
$31.675
SCHOOL ASSIST IN Fit) AFFECTED AREAS MAINT& .................
$71,3113
FEDERAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FUND .......... 4 ........ 6 ............. 666-_
$57,077
SPECIAL BENEFITS FOR DISABLED COAL MINERS ....................
$3,223
GENERAL SUPPLY FUND ........ 4 .......... 6 .................................... .......
$2.487
STUDENT LOAN INSURANCE FUND ....................... 6 .................
$876
SITES & EXPENSES. PUBLIC BUIIDINGS PROJ, .............. 6.6 ........
$795,508
TAUNT SEARCH ............................. 6.6 ... 4 ... 6 .............. 6 ............
TEACHER CORPS OPERATIONS & TRAIP41NG ............................
$11.000
$71,692
AGENCY TOTAL . FIDERAL FUNDS .................................
$811,742
UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY SIRVZRANTS TO STATES ..............
$105,484
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
UPWARD BOUND .... 4 .... ..............................4.
$85,000
VOC Fr[OAS SFRV, SOC SEC DISABIL BFNFFICIAR
$3,715
FINIAL FUNDS
...... 64 .........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, NASA....... ........ 66 ...........
$3.380,767
AGENCY TOTAL . FINIAL IUND$6 ............. ..................
536.741,986
AGENCY TOTAL . FIDERAL FUNDS ....... ............ 6 .............
$3,380,767
NIUINCI Or RETIRE ACIIVITIIS•
NIGHER ED ACT INSURED IOANS ............................. 6 .............
($31,664)
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON ARTS AND HUMANITIES
I
DEPARTMENT Of HOU SING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Holut FUNDS
GRANTS FOR PROGRESS IN THE HUMANITIES..
$287.599
RD41AI FUNDS
GRANTS FOR PROGRESS ON 111F ARTS ................. .................
$74,950
OP[N SPACE LAND-UNDEVEIOP[D ................ 4 ...................
14.000
...........
PAYMENTS FOR PROGRESS ON THE ARTS.......................:..... .... ..
$16.000
�; AGE14CY TOTAL -
PAYMENTS FOR PROGRESS Till HUMANITIES..............$40.50)
ocl of rim"t ACIvalli
MPROVEMFNi
IRDS .......................59,1149IEFMfOSURANW.000)INSURANCE
ROPILOANS ................
($24. 000)
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
MPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
HIMILU FUNDS
5 A, I, NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION ...............................
1 1 756
$ .36 .
RNU, FUNDS
C101 -MIN. & WIR. RIS. INVEST. A. TOPO, MAP .....
$420,846
AGENCY TOTAL - FEDERAL FUNDS .................................
$1,361.756
OUTDOOR RECREATION ASSISTANCE ......................
$247.260
OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
SAIINE WATER CONVERSION
$50.000
.................................................6666._
AMER RESOURCES RESEARCH .............................................. -----
$124,097 7
2
Ilm"t FUNDS
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM ....................... 4 ............. ......
$To
AGENCY TOTAL. Flow FUNDS......... ..........
1 $342,203
AGENCY TOTAL - FIDERAL FUNDS .................................
SID
• ttFARTMENf OF JUSTICE
I MAt FUNDS
POSTAL SERVICE
CkANTS FOR LAW [NFOkCiMlNI ASSISTANCE ..................
$51475
IIDIRAL FUNDS
III[ POSTAL FUND .............................. ................................. ... ........
$2,776,437
AGENCY TOTAL - FIDIRAL FUNDS......... ........................
$SI:473
AGENCY TOTAL . FIDERAt FUNDS ..................... ............
$2,276,432
b(FARTMENT OF LABOR
• qxut FUNDS
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
'IDIRAI EMPLOY[[ INJURY COMPENSATION
$30 M
IINRAL FUNDS
.........................
YDIA-INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING .... .
$73:6'9
SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR RR:WORKFRS ................. . .....
$255.270
......
'LAC1191,11 SERVICES
SSIJOD
AG[HCY TOTAL. FIDIRAL FUNDS ......................
$255,270
45
FEDERAL INFORMATION
EXCHANGE SYSTEM
COUNTY SUMMARIES - AGENCY OPERATIONS
9Du1gN
IF
noulpll
'.. IT 1913
(ODI
WUI
S. cox
olnuT
EDUC DEPRIVED CHILD LOCAL ED AGENCIES .....: -
$137,917
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
HEALTH UJSUN EOR AGED HOSPITAL INSURANCE... -
3 ,943:
Haut FUNDS ',;,
$74.729.
HEALTH INSUR FOR AGEOSUPPLfM MED INSURANC••• :.,,•••,•. n.-.-
$170,19S
5 h F: SE I CC FIVE SERVICE SYSTEM ..............I. u_._
$24,729
MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. ......•
ASSIS J.MAI H I E NANCE ASSIST (ST AII AT i -
$20AD1%
- AGENCY TOTAL - FEDERAL FUNDS........ ...4....».
PUBLIC
ASSISIANCC•SOCIAL SERVICES '- .•
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION................PUBLIC
PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE -STATE 6 LOCAL IRAIHING'..,u
L
S
Caul rull0s
-"_-..
'. $47,750:
REHAB SERVICES 6 FACILITIES BASIC SUPPORT...: n
SECURITY DISABILITY INSURANCE............
UK f•
'.. DIN+SIIR LOANS .....:E. ••
AGINCt TOTAL • F[0[RAL FUNDS .............................'
S42,250
SOCIAL
SOCIAL SfClIRI1Y�REITUMENI INSURANCE ........: ....... .. .
SfCURIIKSURVIVOR51N5UMNCC .... --"
$3.131 C;;
11.707,116
INnaNna nauuluvnut'
10 STATE S LOCAL DCVEIOP. COMPANIES.......-^
1$315,0001' - -
SOCIAL
STUDENT IOAN INSURANCE FUND ••••
SOC SCC DISABIL BENEFICIAR: --
�'�
.. $3,54
LOANS IS 'a
SMALI BUSINESS FINANCIAL AS PROGRAM ••••• . —
VOC REHAB SERV: '., ...
AGENCY TOTAL • 110[200 FUNDS :.......
36,216,605
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
1NnU(%CI DI llaul A[11V1111f' -
(S56,6111
-Pf"Al 1UN01
R LU ACI INSURED LOANS......... •••.• ••••
TENNESSEEVALLEYAUTHORITY FUND..._ ............. ... ___.-
$177
5172
IIEPARTMLNI OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
AGENCY TOTAL • FEDERAL IUNDS............ ....••
'
INHUNMI01 TGAGE ACTIVITIEINSURANCE
(1177.0001
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION '
.....••. _
HOME MORTGAGE INSURANCE.:.... •••••• --
HOPE
CONY FUNDS
OF HOSPITAL 6 DOMICILIARY FAC --
19
DEPARTMENT OF THE IMERIOR.
CONSTRUCTION
DEPENDENCY JS INDEMNITY h DEATH COM PENSATIO 'I —
_
$1$6 166
nOut FUNDS
OUTDOOR RECREATION ASSISTANCE -•
$14,817
GENERAL NST FUND' ..............».................................. -"S11.0
ADMIN: BMISC. OPERATING EXP .................:....' ___-.
'�,.
NCO TOTAL • 110(201 LANDS .. ... ... .....».
$16,617
MEDICAL
MEDICAL AND PROSTHETIC RESEARCH .............................. . _-_
31,215,134
$19.731
DEPARTMENT OF LIBOR '
ME
j -SONS, DAUGHTERS, WIVES 6 WIDOWS EDUCATION ... %1—
..
'$320.201
Caul FUNDS _ �.
14,407.
VETERANS DEATH PENSION .... :1I__
$786,882
"JOB OPPORTUNITIES IN PRIVATE BUST SECTOR --
$72.642
VETERANS DISABILITY COMPENSATION..... D
3205.732
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE -
VCI[RANS DISABILITY PENSION - u -.
314,295,531
AGENCY TOTAL*. FEDERAL LANDS....... ....
327111
VETERANS HOSPITALIZATION......: ... _ _^'
;,3191,336
VETERANS INSURANCE AND INOFhINIi IES. . n__
7680
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
VETERANS READJUSTMENT TRAINING...... -• U._.
BURIAL AWARDS 6 OTHER NUSC BLNEF PMT ......... n.__
$76005 ',
CauT b 5110..E SVC ......... ____
MARINE.
S513
VETS
VETS. REHAB. TRAINING FOR DISABLED VETS .............. n_:_
$27,047
GLIA
COAST GUARD
30703 • 1[DFRAL NMDS
FEDERAL
$Sx
AGENCY TOTAL. FEDERAL FUNDS .................................
$19,217,790
AGENCY
TREASURDEPARTMENT
1NRaMl a Raul •rnmns •
IN URED LOANS •• ---
VETERANS GUARANIFCD AND INS
GUARANTEED
ANTESTOTAL
131,305.689)
' FTWUL .__•_
naullURDS V, .
PUBLICDEBT 6 SAVINGS BOND DI
$960
'NS
COUNTY FEDERAL LANDS:.: ...... .. ......
337,012.509
IE
FISCAL ASSISTANCE 70 STATE 6 LOCAL GOVT$ ---
$454.34
' 51,043.787
INTEREST ON THE PUBLIC DEBT ••••••• ••••••••• •• 1A--
COUNTY -JONES
AGENCY TOTAL. IEDIRAL TUNDS .....:,;, .........
,$1,/91,311
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
CIVIL SERVICE. COMMISSION
Caul IVMa +
D
SASSISTANCEOUPONS:_........._
$202.760
b558
HOItALFUNDs t ___ . $17
ANNUITIES UNDER SPECIAL ACTS, CSC ..................................
$776,003
SIA
' TO SCHOOLS PROGRAM �a _'
NON
' $17377
CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT & DISABILITY FUND I_.
$276,010
PAYhMENT1 TO STATES FOR SCHOOL MILK ...........
b$1,319
ALFNCY TOTAL • ([0[203 FUNDS .....:... ......_..
SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM (CASH PAYMENTS) ................ .. le_-
$9.589
SPECIAL FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN .... U
$9,509
POSTAI SERVICE ..
ADM. A OP[R f%P.. FED. CROP INS CORP .... 4
$17,007
1101"tFUNDS.... - -
"
__ $646560
- COMMODITY OPERATIONS ..•
$538.031
TIFF POSTAL FUND •...••..•
$8/1,360
LOANSINVENTORY
COhlh10DITY LOANS ............... ..._..:......
EXTENSION SERVICE, AGRICULTURE......... 11.-_
.. $$1�5. 5
AGENCY TOTAL FEDERAL IUNDS......... .....
., COOPERATIVE
.. (ROP INSURANCE INDEMNITY PAYMENTS. FCIC •-•
$36304
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD
CROPLAND ADJUSTMENT PROGRAM..... •-•
ADJUSTMENT PROGRA -PUBLIC ACCESS »:......... :--
-
Haul IUNDS
SOCIAL INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR RR WORKERS ......... H._
$90764
CROPLAND ... _�
' EMERGENCY CONSERVATION MEASURES ....:...:............:.
$7085
.' 57,005
$3.800
AGENCY IOTAI-• FEDERAL FUNDS .:................. .............
491,761
' FARM OPERATING ....TABI.:.. ATI ••• .
••• -
S7 •217.506
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
'
UCTIONOANS
FEED OR PRODUCTION STABILIZATION
FOREST PROI[CTION B UTILIZATION, FS $709
- ..... It_-_„: $15,017
INIIaMi a naul A011ItIll
BUSINESS FINANCIAL ASST. PROGRAM ......••• •-•--
IU7161D1
• ..•....•.
NATIONAL \NODI ACT PAYMENTS
117,879
SMALL -
RESEAL STORAGE.......... .....................».
t
''
$98.658
A
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
RURAL ELECTRIC IBAN5:. •••••• •••••••••••^ •^^""' ,__ $08,077
RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM....:.... $77,00
nwul ruNot
DS 6INDFMNitt 6 0[Ail1 COMP(NSAl10......... . u
.._ W.970
5 h E. ASCS................................................ ................ I $25.767
'..
DEPENDENCY
SONS, DAUGI11fR5: WIVES 6 WIDOWS [DUCAiION...........•
:.... $6906
$101,989
SOLI AND WATER CONSERVATION ......................................
.1477,364
VETERANS DEATH PENSION. • 11
_..._
STORAGE FACILITY LOANS...... ....................................
$S' 288,679
O ...
VETERANS DIRECTSAITY .... u.
-
750.630
..._ $750.631
' " AGENCY TOTAL • F[D[Ml FUNDS .................................
...
COM
VETERANS DISABILITY COMPENSATION
$167.854
110tuIM1 a Caul Acnvnns •n
OF COMMODITIES TO SCHOOLS ISE C 6)...... ..... M �-�. ($7.995)
VETERANS DISABILITY PENSION......................................11
VETERANS INSURANCE AND INDEMNITIES...
11
$67,864
$701,96
DONATION
EMERGENCY LOANSOA.
1152.767)
($102,100)
VETERANS READJUSTMENT TRAINING........,
BURIAL AWARDS A OR MISE GENES PMI IF
_
$8•713
............'•'••"""'
FARM OPERAIUIG LOANS ::... ........................
`. 15139 150)
VETS
DI
VETS. RCHAO.TRAINING EORALFUNDSSABLED VETS
$8 ,613
LOANS..........:.ONS.............................. 114 ^.� ($78,717)
FARM DISTRIBUTION
FOOD DISI RIDUIION TO INSTITUTIONS .:......................
AGENCY TOTAL • FEDERAL IUNDS.:.... ••••••••••••
$9x,111
FOOD OISIRIBUIION TO SCHOOLS ............................... "-.
IlD MODERATE INCOME HOUSING LOANS............ --_-
_.: (y430'7J0)
INRUIMI a Raul �nrvnns•.
GUARANTEED AND INSURED l0AN5 ......
._.._ 13773.797)
LOW
RURAL(1ECiRIC IOANS' •-••••••••......••••""""'^• t----_
($735,971)
VETERANS
COUNTY TOTAL . FEDI:.•...•.•••
- ML FUNDS......
.. $13,011,101
DEPARTMENT Of DEFENSE
17011"u11.0% tl
$45,000
COUNTY KEOKUK
M1111ARY RETIRED PAY
AGENCY TOTAL FEDERAL FUNDS .................................
$IS,D00
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
_
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
HIRR.II FUNDS 1
FOOD STAMP BONUS COUPONS - .......
_— $104757
$42a5
FINIAL IUPDf n
SUPPORT PROJECTS...
___ $8,851
PAYMENIS 10 STATES FOR SCHOOL MILK. to
SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM (CASA PAYMENTS) 1' . $$6.660
56.961
AGING.SPFC1Al ....• It•--- $3,330
ADM. A OPER. EXP., FED. CROP INS. ••••• ••
CHILD WELFARE S1•TVICES-_. ... CROP INS. CORPC R.....-----
36'»'
I+--
$89599
,
CRIPPLED CHILDRENS SERVICES......... •^"'""" 1°---
COMMODITY INVENT ORY '
DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLEPBASIC SUPPORT ...........:..........
.$2,467
i
is
46 -
DRK:sc
No.A 2053
SERVICE REQUEST CITY OF IOWA CITY
IOWA CITY. IOWA }
AM
11:00
Dat December 11, 1973 Tlma_---?xx
How Received: Phone m Letter ❑ In Person ❑ Dear Resident: Thank you for calling this matter
Receivrd by
e DaV d Seri 'r`- to our attention. Please call 354.1800 if you i
Mrg 'TDbn T RPPcbp =Phone
'R3A-5898 have any questions. We welcome your inquiries
Nam, 'and are always at your service.
Address ?11 3 Tf)d!2r Dri ve
P.eques Comolaint'about stray and unto p,ed ':docs running loose i.nof her
y ard. ,Would like to see a more vigorous enforcement of the.
.... ..rr
iJ Disposition
Referred to _ _ �. ,�• �0 _
��VA DA Milo
� <r� ��. A:•� ' Dy ,Cf_!� ;+,I to r �:�'�Y �t.'.�. '
E-�7%.c,ct{/ le. yx
Personal Visit ❑
Citizen o r a ron None This
This Form F1'� Phone fvl 'Letter (3
Date P 8y Signature and Tile)
IDEPARTMENT HEAD
f, J
A GENERAL CONTRACT FOR THE j
DEVELOPMENT OF A PEDESTRIAN PASSAGEWAY
SYSTEM IN DOFINTO(JN SIOUX CITY, IOWA
DIVISION -I
DEFINITIONS
As used herein the term "pedestrian passageway" is inclusive and in-
cludes: (1) "public concourse corridors" which are pedestrian passageways
open and available to the public but located wholly within privately developed
structures; (2) "private concourse corridors" are pedestrian passageways
constructed without Agency participation by a Redeveloper within his structure
and which are not an essential link of the public passageway system, access
to which is controlled by the Redeveloper; (3) "skyways" which are
enclosed environmentally controlled bridges open and available to the
public spanning private and/or I public property linking one building structure
with another; (4) "pedestrian vertical access facilities" which are
facilities -connecting pedestrian passageways with the public streets or
other public property; (5) "nodes" which are enlarged portions of pedestrian—
passageways where-either-concourse
edestrianpassagewayswhere-either-concourse corridors sky and/or vertical access
facilities intersect; (6) "concourse lobbies" which are enlarged areas within,
the pedestrian passageway system built by the Redeveloper without Agency`
participation to serve a particularpurpose' unique to the; Redeveloper.
As used herein, "Agency" means the City of Sioux City, -'Iowa, acting as
the Local Public Agency itself .Lnd exercising all of the rights, powers,
and privileges granted by Chapter -403 of the 1973 Code 6f -Iowa. The term
"Redeveloper" refers to a private party participating with Agency in the
development of a pedestrian passageway system within the _downtown area.
DIVISION II
STATEMENT OF INTERPRETATION AND OBJECTIVES
A. Interpretation.
The parties hereto agree that this document shall be interpreted
broadly_, to effegtuate_the objectives set forth below. By so doing, it is the
i
intention of the parties that this Agreement may be modified from time to
time by mutual consent, which cannot be withheld unreasonably, to accommodate -
either the Redeveloper and his construction or the Agency and its construction -
and also to overcome any unique or unforeseen circumstance that may arise
in the construction, operation or maintenance of the pedestrian passageway
system.
B. " Objectives.
The primary purpose of.the_pedestrian passageway system is to
accommodate pedestrians away from the ground level sidewalks and the elements,
enabling pedestrian traffic to move within an environmentally controlled.
pedestrian passageway developed aboveground level so pedestrians are
protected from adverse weather and from vehicles. The pedestrian passageway
system is expected to significantly_ reduce_ pedestrian -vehicle conflicts at
- street level, particularly during periods of peak traffic, thereby permitting
a smoother flow of vehicular traffic and greater safety for the pedestrian. -
This separation of pedestrian and vehicles has permitted the City to reduce
- --- -roadway widths to a minimum, thereby leaving a maximum amount -of -land avail-
able for redevelopment.
Another important benefit of the pedestrian passageway system is the
opportunity affordedredevelopersto provide shop and office space abutting
the concourse corridors. In the use of such shop space, the public will.
be unhindered by adverse weather conditions and traffic, thereby promoting
-the desirability of shopping and doing business in the buildings connected by
skyways and enhancing the economic strength of downtown Sioux City. The
pedestrian passageway system, at the expense of the Redeveloper, subject`
to the consent of Agency,, also may contain sculpture, water displays, -art-
work, and other elements contributing to the esthetic and cultural enrichment
of the citizens of the City, thereby becoming the focus of activity in the
downtown area.
The pedestrian passageway system will be developed at Agency's expense
provided they are built on public property or contained within public
easementsgranted-by_the-Redeveloper and the redevelopment planshaving -been ---'
reviewed by the Agency in accordance with the terms of Division VIII of this
Contract. The Redeveloper will be responsible for the construction of the
Public concourse corridor, within his structure, ,and with the approval of the
Agency may construct private concourse corridors or concourse lobbies at his
i
I own expense which will not be reimbursable by the Agency. The location of
the pedestrian,passageway -system, including concourse corridors, nodes,
vertical access facilities and skyways to be mutually developed by the
Agency and Redeveloper are shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A"
which must be compatible with the entire system of pedestrian passageways
in the downtown area of Sioux City, Iowa.
The pedestrian passageway system will be entirely enclosed and shall be
heated and/or cooled to maintain a temperature range between 600 F and 800 F
to assure pedestrian comfort. The term "enclosed" shall mean protected from
the weather, though the area of the pedestrian passageway system need not
necessarily be confined by its own walls.- The concourse corridors and sky-
ways to be developed by the Agency and/or Redeveloper will be constructed to
a'reimbursable width equal to the inside width of the skyway connecting to
the structure with a larger area to be developed at nodes.
DIVISION IIS
CONSTRUCTION RESPONSIBILITY. DESIGN-AND COSTS
A. Responsibility,
The Agency will be responsible for the construction of the skyways
(including mid-span support systems), pedestrian vertical access facilities,
nd nodes which are located outside Redevelopers property. Redeveloper will
e responsible for construction of all concourse corridors, both public and
rivate,'located within his property and all nodes located within his property.
edeveloper will also be responsible for the additional support in his
improvements necessary-to support the skyways where; they -abut his-structure
t the concourse corridor level. Skyways will be constructed to provide a
inimum clearance of 161 between thelowestpart of the skyway and the street
rade.
Skyways constructed across boundary streets of the CBD-East Project
rea by the Redeveloper will be eligible for Agency participation only upon
pecific approval and authorization of Agency. In any event construction
hereof must meet the requirements contained herein.
- 3
B. ; Design.
The design of the; public pedestrian concourse corridors must meet
the specifications established by the Agency set forth below for the puipose
of distinguishing public areas from private areas. Redeveloper agrees
not to copy or imitate the design identity of the Agency in such a manner
as to confuse or mislead the public from identifying those areas publicly
provided. Therefore, private concourse corridors and concourse lobbies
must be clearly and readily distinguishable from public areas.
C. Coate.
1. Concourse Corridors.
The Redeveloper's actual separate square foot costs of`con—
structing-the
on—struttingthe public concourse corridors will be paid by the Agency in
accordance with the provisions of DIVISION VI below up to a maximum of
$21.00 per square foot as adjusted. However,no private concourse corridor
shall be eligible for reimbursement from the Agency.
2. Nodes
The Agency recognizes that in certain instances nodes will be
necessary and/or desirable within a Redeveloper's' structure. 'However, loca—
tion, design and construction shall always be subject to_Agency's approval.
The Agency will be responsible for paying for the actual
" separate square foot costs of constructing such nodes up to a maximum of
$21.00 per square foot, as adjusted. Such nodes must clearly possess ,a
design identity and 'character separating them from abutting private areas and,
in the sole determination of -the Agency, must be primarily oriented to the
public purpose of accommodating pedestrian travel in the concourse system,
including orientation, direction changes, and congregation, or vertical
movement to street-level.--Nodeslor concourse corridor segments that are
solely or primarily integral to the use of abutting private building areas
will not be eligible for Agency financial participation.
3. Pedestrian Vertical Access Facility.
A pedestrian vertical access facility constructed by the
Redeveloper within his structure connecting, the private ground level floor of
Redeveloper's structure with thepublicconcourse corridors contained within
his structurewillnot.be eligible for Agency participation.
4
MEMORA N D.0 N
Iowa,City, Iowa
December 18 1973
To; The City Council of Iowa City
From; David Baldus(�(.6
Re; Formal Expressions of the Council's
Intent on the Old Cap Offer
I appreciate your concern about further `delay ,of the urban renewal
project. However, from a business standpoint:I do not believe that a
reasonable negotiator would either insist upon or agree to the demand that
the Councilmanifest today some form of intent to accept Old Caps offer.
If your expression of intent is legally binding,' you expose the City
to possible legal action. And, whether binding or not, such an expression
will seriously weaken the City's leverage in fixture negotiations. It
already appears that Old Cap is in control of the discussions. A vote of
intent today, no matter how it is conditioned, will greatly strengthen
that impression.
Thus far the City has shown good ,faith and has acted reasonably
in the negotiations. Under these circumstances, I believe, a prudent
businessperson in the City's position would continue to bargain In good
faith and would agree formally to nothing until all outstanding issues
were settled. The citizen -investors of Iowa City whom you represent are
entitled to the same level of prudence.
DB Es
A pedestrianvertical access facility connecting public property
with the pedestrian passageway will be eligible for Agency, participation if
approved by the Agency prior to construction. -
DIVISION IV
EASEMENTS
Prior to public concourse corridors being eligible for reimbursement
f by the Agency, the Redeveloper must grant to the Agency all necessary
easements for, public use of the concourse corridors and connections therewith
to the skyways to be constructed by Agency.
Such easements shall be coterminous with the designated areas of -
concourse corridors and nodes, vertical access facilities, and -skyways and shal
also extend on the ground floor from the foot of vertical access facilities
to a public sidewalk or other public property giving access to a public, side-
walk. Such easements shall be required for both those pedestrian passageway
system elements for which the Agency is financially responsible and those
elements constituting a link in the basic system for which private parties
-
may be responsible. An example of the latter instancewouldbe_a privately
developed concourse in property-outside•of.the Urban Renewal.area which
connects two skyways built by the Agency or which become property of the Agency.
The easements must -be -in a form satisfactory, to the Agency and will be
limited to the life of the improvements constituting the concourse system.
The easements will grant to the public the`right of use of the concourse
!'
system for purposes of ingress and egress and pedestrian transit without.
•
•j
limitaticnr
DIVISION V
E
UTILITIES AND COST SHARING, AGREEMENTS
— —
j
A. - Utilities:
i
,
The Agency will be responsible for the construction of all skyways
and will provide necessary interior lighting fixtures and wiring, air condi-
+
tioning ducts, heat distribution facilities within the skyway, and any
s
`
other necessary mechanical ani.. electrical facilities. The Redeveloper
will connect the mechanical and electrical; systems of its building to the
skyways and supply to the skyway, facilities the necessary heat, cooled air,
-5— _
l;,
and electrical power from the mechanical and electrical systems of its building
B. Cost Sharing Agreements.
Where a skyway connects the improvements of. Redeveloper with that
of another redeveloper or building owner, each party so connected will be
responsible for sharing the cost of providing the required mechanical services
to the skyway. A'cost-sharing agreement must be reached by the affected
parties and submitted to the Agency for its approval prior to the commencement
of skyway construction.
DIVISION VI
COST DETERMINATION METHODS
In order to determine the actual concourse costs for which the Agency
will be responsible, the Redeveloper mall submit to the Agency actual con-
struction cost data inthefollowing manner:
1. The cost per square foot of providing the basic building shell`
for the building in which the public concourse corridor is located shall be
determined. This cost may include such items as excavation, foundation,
structural frame, floor and ceiling..structure, etc. It may not include
mechanical systems which in part serve the, public concourse corridor. It may --
not include site improvements, interior par titions:and.finishes, land -costs,
architect's -or other; fees, orothercosts not integral to the basic building
shell.
2. The cost per square foot for the interiorfinishes which comprise
and delineate the public concourse corridor area shall be determined. Such
costs for finishes may include floor and ceiling covering, lighting fixtures
and other components actually within the area of the public concourse -corridor."
Where partitions delineate the public concourse corridor from abutting
private building areas, the cost of the partition shall be the sole responsi-
bility of the Redeveloper.
The total of these two cost -per -square -foot determinations shall be
the amount for which the Agency will be responsible for each square foot of
public concourse corridor area, up to a maximum of`$21.00-per square foot,
as adjusted. i
3. The Agency reserves the right to exclude, from the determination of
the cost reimbursable by the Agency, any item not properly part of the basic
building shell or interior finishes.
4. The maximum Agencyexpenditure of $21.00 persquarefoot for
public concourse corridors shall be adjusted quarterly using the "Engineering
- News Record" Building Cost Index for the Sioux City, Iowa, area as of
June 1973, as the base figure. The date upon which the Redeveloper
enters into a construction contract for all or a part of the pedestrian
passageway system shall be used in determining the Building Cost Index
in effect and the applicable maximum limits shall be adjusted accordingly.
DIVISION VII
- DESIGN AND MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
In order to achieve the design identity, continuity, and ease of orien-
tation necessary so the public concourse corridor system can function
effectively, the Agency has established --certain design and materials ,require-
ments. The design of the public concourse corridor system within Redeveloper's
structure shall adhere to or exceed the following requirements; providing
however, any additional costs incurred by better quality materials
shall be borne by the Redeveloper.
A. Ceilings.
1. The general type of ceiling material to be used shall be
acoustical units 12"_x 12" x 5/8" in minimum non-combustible,, non -directional-
fissured mineral tile with a washable vinyl or acrylic' factory applied finish.
Exposed edges shall be slightly beveled. Light reflectance' shall be
.75 or more, NRC shall be .65 or more and units 'shall meet or exceed class
25 of federal spec. SS -S-1182. An example is Johns -Manville "Temper -Toned"
360.
2. Necessary diffusers in the ceiling system shall be of the linear
type_ continuous, and shall be similar to.anemostat linear diffuser stad-F.
3. The 12" deep by 9" wide pocket which is a part of the ceiling
space 3n the skyways, located at the ceiling at both sides shall be a
continuous feature throughout all portions of the pedestrian passageway system,
_ 7
and will consist of a continuous recess flouresent'light fixture similar to
"ALKCO" catalog no. RS-704-D.W/l-F40/CWX lamp. This will be the general
pedestrian passageway lighting in portions `of -the system which are 12'.- 0"
or less in width, and will; be used to wash the walls in all areas of the
system. In portions of the pedestrian passageway system, where additional
general area lighting is required because of the size or configuration of
the space,_ the perimeter lighting is to be supplemented with recessed can
type lighting.
4. Skyway ceilings will have a minimum interior height of 8 feet.
B. Walls.
1.- Exterior walls in the skyways shall consist of solar bronze glass
and steel frame window units with baked enamel All exterior and interior
window frames and door frames and miscellaneous metal items installed in the
- public concourse corridors within privately developed structures -shall be
painted steel, or anodized aluminum. -Aluminum finish shall -be equal -to
"ALCOA DURONODIC 3135"_dark -bronze, satin finish.Steel shall be painted to
match the aluminum finish above.
2. All interior walls in the pedestrian passageway system which
are solid walls shall have a vinyl applied surface to the wall as the base
material, and shall be COME Surface 1 318 -SO off white.
3.' All spaces within the skyway system which require supplemental
heating at the base shall be covered with an anodized aluminum or baked
enamel steel cover similar to "Hofco" aluminum cover. The configuration
and location of the supplemental heating at the base is to be compatible to
the configuration and location as indicated in the drawings for that portion
I
of the skyway between Hilton Hotel and Sioux City Plaza (such configuration
and location will be subject to the approval of the Agency).
C. Floors.
All portions of the skyway system shall receive carpet which shall -
be #5554 buckskin as manufactured_ by Carpet Systems Commercial Carpet
Corporation TXR-10. The carpet is to be applied directly to the surface
with adhesive. The base shall be 4" dark brown vinyl base.
D. Symbols, Graphics and Equipment.
1. Pedestrian Passageway System Symbol:
8
The Agency has developed a graphic symbol ,for the pedestrian
passageway system. Such symbollshall be used only as and where approved and
indicated by the Agency. The symbol shall be used at the exterior of all
grade -level building entrances that provide direct access to the system. It
shall also be used as approved by the Agency, in other building areas, to-
gether with arrows or other directional indicators, to indicate the location
of the public concourse corridor system.
2, Concourse System Graphics:
Graphis will play a vital role in orientation in the concourse
corridor system and, through consistency of design and placement, will also
constitute a vital element in achieving concourse corridor system identity.
The Agency will be responsible forthedesign of all concourse system graphics.
Such graphite shall be used only as and where approved and indicated
by the Agency. -
All directional and informational graphics in the skyway system
shall be applied to the wall and glass surfaces and shall incorporate the
use of international symbols where appropriate. The letter type shall be
"Helvetica-Medium" large and small case. The graphics applied shall be
vinyl and of large-scale. only graphics for general direction and information
shall be incorporated and specific direction or information pertaining to
the functions adjacent shall not be incorporated. For instance,
graphics which indicates the direction to Redeveloper's structure is allowable,
but graphics indicating the direction to a department or -tenant in
Redeveloper's structure will not be allowed. Any: specific information or
direction may beincorporatedwithin private areas which are adjacent to the
public pedestrian passageway system. -
3. CostsandAuthority to Install.
Original installation of all symbols and graphics to be placed
in skyways or public concourse corridors shall be the responsibility of the
Agency. The costs of these symbols and graphics installed by the Agency shall
be borne by the Agency. The Redeveloper may request additional symbols or
graphics to the original numbers of such symbols or graphics installed by
the Agency; however, the total cost of such additional symbols or graphics
permitted by the Agency shall be borne by the Redeveloper.
9
i
The relocation,'maintenance, and/or removal of all public con- j.
course corridor symbols or graphics will be the responsibility of the
Redeveloper. Relocations or removals of such symbols or graphics shall be
imade only with specific approval by the Agency.
Only symbols or graphics approved by the Agency will be -
allowed in the public pedestrian concourse corridor or skyway; all non -
approved symbols or ,graphics shall be removed by the Redeveloper at the -
Redeveloper's expense without regard to who may have installed the said
symbols or graphics.
s
4. ;Equipment.
The Redeveloper, at his expense and with the approval of Agency,
may install or provide items of equipment for location in nodes area of
sufficient size, such as sculpture, decorative fountains,public telephones,
drinking fountains, kiosks for display of material of public or historical
interest, trash recepticals, ash trays, benches, and chairs. The placement
of any type of equipment in or on the public concourse corridor or skyway
_ shall be subject to Agency's approval.
The placement of furniture in areas other than nodes or the -
placement of advertising material in the public pedestrian passageway system
by the Redeveloper or his tenants shall not be permitted. The policing of
this requirement is the obligation of the Redeveloper with respect to con-
course corridors within and skyways abutting his structure.
DIVISION VIII
METHOD OF AGENCY PAYMENT
As a prior condition to the reimbursement by, the Agency for pedestrian
passageway system construction undertaken by developer, preliminary plans and
cost estimates therefor will be submitted to the Agency for approval and in
no event shall the Agency provide monies under the provisions of this docu-
ment for improvements which are not clearly identifiable as part of the
pedestrian' concourse system. Plans submitted by the Redeveloper for approval
by the Agency shall indicate all materials and finishes used in the concourse
system, and shall clearly indicate the architectural manner in which the
10 _
concourse corridor
_system 1s clearly_ separated from abutting private building
areas where the concourse corridors occur within the Redeveloper's building.
The Agency reserves the right to make certain additions to such drawings,
including signs and other graphics, furniture, and other elements consistent
with achieving identity and design continuity for each segment of the
pedestrian passageway system. The cost estimates provided by the Redeveloper
at this time will include the estimated square foot cost of the building shell
and the estimated square foot coats of all finishes integral to the area
-- of the concourse corridor, as set forth in DIVISION VI above. The Agency
will review such drawings.and cost data, and upon Agency approval, such
drawings and data will be submitted by the Agency to the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (DHUD) for concurrence as to the eligibility
for non-cash grant-in-aid credit for the subject segment of the pedestrian
passageway system within Redeveloper's property. No construction of the
pedestrian system within Redeveloper's structures shall be reimbursable without
DHUD concurrence. -
DIVISION IX
PEDESTRIAN PASSAGE[JAY OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The Redeveloper assumes the full responsibility and liability for the
operation,' security, maintenance, cleaning (cleaning includes the removal of
prohibited symbols, graphics and advertising materials), repair and replacement
for all segments of the pedestrian passageway system located within his
property, and for skyways over public property abutting his 'property, and
-all public vertical access facilities on, adjacent tc, or abutting Redeveloper'
property, and shallcarryout such operation, security, maintenance, cleaning,'
repair and replacement at its own expense without cost to the Agency. All re
placements of signs, symbols, graphics, equipment, or structural parts shall
beofa quality equal to or greater than that originally; provided. In the
event _that _the Redeveloper fails to operate, keep secure, maintain, repair or `
replace the pedestrian passageway system or any part thereof to a reasonable
standard, the Redeveloper consents to the City performing such operations and
assessing all costs incurred in so doing against the Redeveloper in accordance f;
with the procedures established for the..Abatement of Nuisances as prescribed
by the Municipal Code of Sioux City, Iowa.
I
i
- 11 -
Where skyways connect the property of the Redeveloper with that of
another, the Redevelopers may share equally, or on whatever other basis
as mutually agreeable to both, in the operation, `security, `'maintenance,
cleaning, repair and replacement costa. Such agreement must be submitted
to the Agency for approval prior tocommencementof skyway construction.
In the event; the Redevelopers are unable to reach an agreement, each
shall be responsible for the obligations imposed -herein -for that area
from the Redeveloper's private structure to the centerline of the skyway.
The concourse corridors and 'abutting skyways within Redeveloper's structure
will be open on a 24-hour basis each day of the year.
DIVISION X
LIABILITY
The Redeveloper shall be liable fon all damages, caused by his negligence
failure of his building structure, or lack of proper maintenance,' to persons
or their property lawfully using the pedestrian passageway system -located,_-,
within his property and within the skyways over streets abutting his
property. .The Redeveloper shall be liable for all damages caused by
failure of the Redeveloper's structure at the point where the skyways abuts
the Redeveloper's improvement at the concourse corridor floor level.
DIVISION XZ
DURATION
This agreement shall be in full force and effect from and after its
execution for the life of the structures -to which it applies or until such
time as the parties mutually agree to an earlier termination.
This agreement and all modifications thereto will be recorded documents,
and the privileges, rights, and duties thereof, and, each and every of them,
shall inure to the .benefit of-and'be binding upon the successors and assigns
of the Redeveloper. Redeveloper shall comply with all applicable federal
and state laws and regulations governing any transfer of property covered-
by this contract and Redeveloper agrees to notify the Agency 30 days in
advance of his intent to assign or transfer his property governed by this
contract and a statement to the effect that the Redeveloper has advised his
successor or assign of the existence of this agreement.
- 12 -
DIVISION XII
CITY ORDINANCES
Redeveloper.agrees to abide by all applicable City Ordinances, present
and future which apply to sidewalks and pedestrian passageways. -Wherever
there is a'conflict between a City Ordinance and -this -agreement, theCity
Ordinance shall prevail,
DIVISION XIII
INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
-- - - Redeveloper shall furnish and maintain; and pay ;all premiums and other
expenses for public liability and casualty insurance coverage with a duly
licensed insurance company, wherein the Agency shall be designated as co-
insured, said insurance containing the following minimum coverages:- for
personal injuries, including death $1,000,000 per person; $1,000,000 in any
single accident. The casualty insurance shall..have all _risk of physical'
loss coverage in the amount of the full replacement cost of the skyway.
The Redeveloper shall furnish to the Agency proper certificates executed
by representatives of the insurance company or companies:evidencing that
the insurance provided above has been issued. The insurance carrier or
carriers shall also certify to the Agency that written notice ohall-be
given to the Agency at least thirty (30) days prior to cancellation of any
coverage set forth in said certificate.
The Redeveloper agrees to. indemnify and save harmless and defend the
Agency, its officers, employees, and agents from and against all loss or,
expenses (including costs and attorneys' fees) by reason of liabilityimposed
by law upon the -Agency, its officers,, employees or agents, for damages because
Of bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom sustained by
any person or ,persons or on account of damage to property, including loss
of use thereof, arising out of or in consequence of any construction, duties
or obligations set forth in this contract, whether such injuries to persons
or damage to property is due or claimed to be due to the negligence of
Redeveloper, his contractors or tenants, the Agency, its officers, employees
13
AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT AND
OPERATION OF A PEDESTRIAN PASSAGEWAY
- SYSTEM
This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Sioux
City, Iowa, a Municipal Corporation organized and existing pursuant -
to the Laws of the State of Iowa and exercising all of the rights, powers
and privileges itself granted by virtue of Chapter 403 of the 1973 Code
of Iowa (hereinafter referred to as "Local Public `_Agency")'and Woodbury
Development Corporation, an Iowa Corporation (hereinafter referred to as
Redeveloper").
This Agreement shall govern the development and operation-of a
Pedestrian Passageway System pursuantto the terms and conditions of that
instrument entitled "A General Contract for the Development of a
Pedestrian Passageway System in Downtown-Sioux City, Iowa" which is
attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by,reference`incorporated herein
as though fully set forth.
-_ DIVISION L
ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT
The parties hereto mutually accept and agree to all terms, conditions
and respective rights, duties and obligations contained and set forth within
i
attached "Exhibit A" except as hereinafter specifically excluded,
DIVISION II
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
That the property subject to this Agreement and attached "Exhibit A" are
as follows:
Disposition Parcels No. 1 and 3, Block 55; Disposition Parcel No.
.I
- 5, Block 69; Disposition Parcel No. 7, Block 56; that property
lying between Disposition Parcel No. 5 and 7, Block 69 and
S
;.
56 respectively; that property lying between Disposition Parcel
No. 7 and 3, Blocks 56 and 55 respectively and that property
identified as "public open space" all of which is described herein
as set forth and as described under a "Contract for Sale of Land
for Private Redevelopment" executed by and between the City of
3
Sioux City, Iowa, a Municipal Corporation and Woodbury Development
Corporation, dated May 26, 1969, filed January 29, 1970, Book 1237,
_ 2 _
Page 1 of the records of the Woodbury County Recorder and
as subsequently amended together, with all future additions or
extensions to the Pedestrian Passageway System within and from
Disposition Parcel No. 3, Block 55,_across 'the 4th Street Mall
to Block 70, CBD -West.
DIVISION III.
EXCLUSION
The parties hereto mutually agree that Redeveloper,:shall not be
required pursuant to Division VIII ,of "Exhibit A" as a precondition to
eligibility for reimbursement by _the Local Public Agency for Pedestrian
Passageway System construction to submit to Local Public Agency preliminary
plans and cost estimates for approval as such requirement pertains to
Disposition Parcel No, 5. Redeveloper must submit contract plans and
- actual cost information in accordance with other remaining provisions of
"Exhibit A" to be eligible for reimbursement as to Disposition Parcel No. 5.
It is expressly agreed the exclusion contained within this Division
shall only apply ,to -Disposition Parcel No. 5 and shall not except, alter'
or vary the remaining rights, duties 'or obligations of the parties
hereto as to the remaining terminology-contained_within'Division VIII of
said "Exhibit A" or to any property subject to the Agreement other than -
DispositionParcelNo. 5.
_Signed by Redeveloper on the 12th day of -November 1973, at
St. Paul . Minnesota
Signed by the Local Public Agency on the 3rd day of December ,
1973, pursuant to the authority of Resolution No. s- 23936 passed by
the City Council of Sioux City, Iowa, on the 3rd day of December 1973.
i
CITY OF SIOUX CITY, IOWA
Attest: S
'EARL AA.; ; CITY CLERK PAUL A. BERGS ,,MAYOR
WOODBURY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION t
Attest:,
y: w
Secretary ANDREWS, ALLEN,PRESIDENT
r.