Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-10-25 Info Packetj r 1 City Council Information Packet rrrrmw October 25, 2018 CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org IP1. Council Tentative Meeting Schedule Miscellaneous IP2. Email from Council Member Teague with articles: Potential public health and transit program P3. Copy of article from Council Member Thomas: The Neighborhood Is the Unit of Change IP4. Memorandum from City Manager: Sunday Transit Service IP5. Copy of article from City Manager: Take the bus for free on Election Day in Iowa City IP6. Copy of article from City Manager: When Many College Students Live Off Campus, Poverty Rate Goes Up IP7. Memorandum from City Clerk: Proposed Council Meeting Schedule, January - April 2019 IP8. Memorandum from City Clerk: KXIC Radio Show IP9. Memorandum from Neighborhood Services Coordinator: Aid to Agencies - Emerging Agencies Audit Policy IP10. Quarterly Investment Report: July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018 IP11. Email from Agnieszka Gaertner to Streets/Traffic Engineering Superintendent: Sidewalk IP12. Civil Service Entrance Examination: Maintenance Worker I I - Transportation Services IP13. Civil Service Entrance Examination: Mass Transit Operator IP14. Invitation: Johnson County Affordable Housing Coalition Community Meeting - October 26 P15. Invitation: Talk on Public Banking - October 26 Draft Minutes IP16. Airport Commission: September 26 P17. Public Art Advisory Committee: October 4 October 25, 2018 City of Iowa City Page 1 Item Number: 1. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Council Tentative Meeting Schedule ATTACHMENTS: Description Tentative MeeLing Schedule r WAN CITY CITY OF IOWA CITY Date City Council Tentative Meeting Schedule Subject to change Time Meetina October 25, 2018 Location Tuesday, November 6, 2018 4:00 PM 7:00 PM Work Session Formal Meeting Emma J. Harvat Hall Tuesday, November 20, 2018 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall Monday, January 14, 2019 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Jo. County Admin Bldg. Tuesday, December 4, 2018 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall Tuesday, January 22, 2019 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Emma J. Harvat Hall Tuesday, December 18, 2018 5:00 PM Work Session ww Emma J.HarvatwHall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Saturday, January 5, 2019 8:00 AM Budget Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall Tuesday, January 8, 2019 5:00 PM 7:00 PM Work Session Formal Meeting Emma J. Harvat Hall Monday, January 14, 2019 4:00 PM 4:30 PM Reception Joint Entities Meeting Jo. County Admin Bldg. Wednesday, January 16, 2019 1:00 PM Budget Work Session (CIP) Emma J. Harvat Hall Tuesday, January 22, 2019 5:00 PM 7:00 PM Work Session Formal Meeting Emma J. Harvat Hall Item Number: 2. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Email from Council Member Teague with articles: Potential public health and transit program ATTACHMENTS: Description Email from Council Member Teague and articles Julie Voparil From: Bruce Teague Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 1:12 PM To: Geoff Fruin <Geoff-Fruin@iowa-city.org> Subject: Fwd: Potential public health and transit program Someone shared the information with me below. I stated to David I would share with other council members. Looking for your thoughts on how to share this information. Bruce Teague Begin forwarded message: From: David Arch <davidcarch92@gmail.com> Date: October 5, 2018 at 1:22:17 PM CDT To: bruce-teague@iowa-city.org Subject: RE: Potential public health and transit program Dear Mr. Teague, Thank you for taking the time to speak with me about this potential program. Here are a few links with information about the idea being implemented in other places: https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewbender/2013/11/14/moscow-subway-station-lets-passengers-pay-fa re- in-sg uats/#36f53108bOd8 https://www.theguardian.com/society/shortcuts/2015/ian/27/mexico-beat-obesity-make-commuters-do- sg uats-fo r-free-su bway-tickets Obviously the system would have to be tailored to fit Iowa City's needs, but it would be very viable, I believe. In addition to promoting public health, this idea could also serve as a very good opportunity to increase public awareness of public transit opportunities in the area, as well as potentially positively impacting ridership numbers and interest in the system. Thank you for your time, David Arch Moscow Subway Station Lets Passengers Pay Fare In Squats 64,577 views I Nov 14, 2013, 01:03pm Moscow Subway Station Lets Passengers Pay Fare In Squats 0) Andrew Bender contributor Q I delve into the business of business tz•avel, cvzd often the fun too. The Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, Russia are still nearly three months away, but the competition is already heating up in one Moscow subway station. Passengers can vie to pay their fare in exercise. The exercise in question is squats, that Page 1 of 8 strength -training essential that helps build the muscles of the thighs, hips, buttocks, quads and hamstrings, as well as strengthen the core. To get the free ticket: 1. Go to Vystavochaya Station and find the ticket machine with the special squat sensor. 2. Squat away. Complete at least 30 squats within two minutes, and you get a free ticket, much personal satisfaction and perhaps a few cheers from bystanders. No word as to whether you get a seat on the metro for your weary legs. 3. Fewer than 3o reps: squat fail. Pay 3o rubles for a ticket (about USD$o.91), and do the walk of shame to your train with the hundreds of other hapless losers. According to the Russian Olympic Committee, no count has been taken of the number of free tickets issued, but interest is "very strong enthusiastic." https://www.forbes.com/siteslandrewbender/2013/ l l /l4lmoscow-subway-station-lets-pas... 10/24/2018 Moscow Subway Station Lets Passengers Pay Fare In Squats Page 2 of 8 Ultimately, Olympic officials say, it's about bringing sports to the people. "We wanted to show that the Olympic Games are not just an international competition most people watch on TV every two years," said Alexander Zhukov, president of the Russian Olympic Committee. "They are also about involving everyone in the sporting way of life." YOU MAY ALSO LIKE Los Angeles -based personal trainer Josh Hoover says that squats are a good call for this venue, "one of those foundational exercises that everybody should be doing." Squats build core strength, burn calories and, done properly, work out the entire body. "They're an excellent way to get a little exercise into your day." The squat -to -ride ticket machine will be operating until December 3, 2013. Here's some video of people working hard for their fares: More on Forbes: Gallery: Fun Facts About Olympic Sponsorship https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewbender/2013/11 /14/moscow-subway-station-lets-pas... 10/24/2018 Mexico's latest way to beat the obesity epidemic: make commuters do squats for free sub... Pagel of 3 Gdar,ianed I :1 Z :bfLAa n ij Mexico's latest way to beat the obesity epidemic: make commuters do squats for free subway tickets The country is one of the world's fattest nations, but can making people do to squats in exchange for a metro ride be anything more than a gimmick? Kate Carter Tue 27 Jan 201512.55 EST n 2013, Mexico squeezed past the United States to become one of the fattest nations on the planet - with 32.8% of the population classified as obese, according to a UN report. In response, its government announced a hefty tax on sugary drinks. Now, though, it is getting a bit more creative, and installing 30 motion - sensitive machines at subway stations that will dispense a free ticket to anyone who completes 10 squats. Incentive -driven approaches to fighting obesity - essentially paying people to lose weight - are not new, though anyone hoping to profit on their new year diet might want https://www.theguardian.com/society/shortcuts/2015/j anl271mexico-beat-obesity-make-c... 10/24/2018 Mexico's latest way to beat the obesity epidemic: make commuters do squats for free sub... Page 2 of 3 to move to Dubai, where, in 2013, the government offered its citizens 1 gram of gold for every lkg (2.2lbs) they lost. More importantly, such incentives appear to work - studies have shown that financial rewards are an effective motivation for weight loss. So combining a spot of exercise with saving money on that universal grind, the daily commute, is perhaps less gimmicky than it appears. But will it really make any difference? A basic squat involves moving into a crouching position, sticking the bottom out, heels down, weight centred over your feet, and up again. It's perhaps not the most dignified move to make in a crowded station, but a brilliant exercise for the legs and core. There are endless variations on the humble squat, from jump squats to lumping huge weights on your back - officials in Mexico City should definitely consider giving an upgrade to anyone who can manage those squats with a suitcase on each arm. Mexicans are lucky: Russians had to do 30 squats for a free ticket on Moscow's metro in a scheme in 2013. Photograph: Yuri Kadobnov/AFP/Getty Images Ten squats a day, however, is a fairly low baseline and unlikely to burn more than a handful of calories. What it might do - and this, you imagine, is the government's hope - is start a virtuous circle. If you have knocked off your 10 squats, you might opt for the stairs over the lift, or walk a little further than usual on the way home. One Russian station tried a similar idea before the Sochi Winter Olympics - though the exchange rate there was a less favourable 30 squats per ride. Obesity rates in the UK are the highest in Europe, so might London Transport consider the same approach? The press office, alas, gives short shrift to the idea. "Errr, no," says a spokesman. Then again, Mexico City's subway tickets cost five pesos (22p), the equivalent of two squats per peso. A peak zone 1 -only ticket with an Oyster card in London is currently £2.30 - around 50 pesos. So that's 100 squats, 200 for a return, or a whopping 515 squats for an £11.70 zone 1-6 travelcard. And you probably wouldn't even get a seat either. Since you're here... http s://www.theguardian. comisociety/shortcuts/2015 /j anl271mexico-beat-obesity-make-c... 10/24/2018 Mexico's latest way to beat the obesity epidemic: make commuters do squats for free sub... Page 3 of 3 ... we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading The Guardian's independent, investigative journalism than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven't put up a paywall - we want to keep our reporting as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to the voiceless, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It's what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical. If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure. For as little as $1, you can support the Guardian - and it only takes a minute. Thank you. Support The Guardian 'VISA Topics ■ Obesity • Shortcuts • City transport • Mexico • Americas • Health & wellbeing • features PoyPd https://www.theguardian.comisocietylshortcuts/2015/j anl271mexico-beat-obesity-make-c... 10/24/2018 Item Number: 3. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Copy of article from Council Member Thomas: The Neighborhood Is the Unit of Change ATTACHMENTS: Description Article from Council Member Thomas Opinion I The Neighborhood Is the Unit of Change - The New York Times Pagel of 3 From Council member Thomas Wbe Ntiv Rork Mimeo The Neighborhood Is the Unit of Change No, starfish are not saved one by one. Y _1 By David Brooks Opinion Columnist Oct. 18, 2018 You've probably heard the starfish story. There's a boy on the beach who finds thousands of starfish washed ashore, dying. He picks one up and throws it back into the ocean. A passer-by asks him what's the point of that. All these thousands of other starfish are still going to die. "Well," the boy responds, "I saved that one." Many of our social programs are based on that theory of social change. We try to save people one at a time. We pick a promising kid in a neighborhood and give her a scholarship. Social programs and philanthropic efforts cream skim in a thousand ways. Or they mentor one at a time, assuming that the individual is the most important unit of social change. Obviously it's possible to do good that way. But you're not really changing the structures and systems that shape lives. Maybe the pool story is a better metaphor than the starfish story. As a friend of mine puts it, you can't clean only the part of the pool you're swimming in. It could be that the neighborhood, not the individual, is the essential unit of social change. If you're trying to improve lives, maybe you have to think about changing many elements of a single neighborhood, in a systematic way, at a steady pace. One of the signature facts of the internet age is that distance is not dead. Place matters as much as ever, and much more than we ever knew. You have 4 free articles remaining. https://www.nytimes.coml20l 8l10/ 18lopinionlneighborhood-social-infrastructure-commu... 10/22/2018 Opinion I The Neighborhood Is the Unit of Change - The New York Times Page 2 of 3 Subscribe to The Times The typical American adult lives 18 miles from his or her mother. The typical college student enrolls in a college 13 miles from home. A study of Facebook friends nationwide found that 63 percent of the people we friend live within 100 miles. Americans move less these days, not more. Work by the economist Raj Chetty and others shows that children who grow up in one neighborhood can have drastically different life outcomes than people who grow up in demographically similar neighborhoods nearby. Just take two findings to illustrate a rash of them: On April 1, 2010,44 percent of low-income black men from the Watts neighborhood of central Los Angeles were incarcerated. But just 6.2 percent of the men who grew up with similar incomes in central Compton were incarcerated on that day. Central Compton is 2.3 miles from Watts. Low-income children who moved at birth from the low upward -mobility area of Seattle's Central District to the high upward -mobility area of Shoreline earned, at age 35, $9,000 a year more than those who had made this move in their 20s. Shoreline is 10 miles from the Central District. In a classic study, the sociologist Eric Klinenberg showed just how important neighborhood is in determining who survives in a crisis. Klinenberg compared deaths in two Chicago neighborhoods during a heat wave in 1995. More than six times as many people died in North Lawndale as in South Lawndale, even though the two places are demographically comparable. The fact is that human behavior happens in contagious, networked ways. Suicide, obesity and decreasing social mobility spread as contagions. When you think in neighborhood terms rather than in individual terms you see things previously rendered invisible. For example, Klinenberg found that fewer people died in South Lawndale in great part because there was more social connection there. Klinenberg's new book, "Palaces for the People," emphasizes the importance of "social infrastructure," physical places like libraries where people can gather. What do libraries have to do with deaths in a heat wave? It turns out quite a lot. Libraries nurture relationships among people who check in on one another when crises hit. https://www.nytimes.coml20l 8l10/ 18lopinionlneighborhood-social-infrastructure-commu... 10/22/2018 Opinion I The Neighborhood Is the Unit of Change - The New York Times Page 3 of 3 Some people say that we have to promote both kinds of change, individual and neighborhood. Of course that's true, but it's also what people say when they don't know how to think in geographic terms and don't know how to adjust their work to neighborhood realities. Thinking in neighborhood terms requires a radical realignment in how you see power structures. Does the neighborhood control its own networks of care, or are there service providers coming down from above? Do the local norms of interaction need to be changed? For example, do people feel it's normal to knock on a neighbor's door and visit, or would that be considered a dangerous invasion of privacy? Are there forums where the neighborhood can tell its collective story? Thinking in neighborhood terms means radical transformation in how change is done. It means escaping the tyranny of randomized controlled experiments in which one donor funds one program that tries to isolate one leverage point to have "impact." It means adjusting the structures of the state so that the neighborhood is an important structure of self-government, rather than imposing blanket programs willy-nilly across neighborhood lines. The good news is that there are more neighborhood -based programs than there used to be, like the Resident Association of Greater Englewood in Chicago. But we haven't even begun to sort out the implications of what comes next now that we understand the utter centrality of place. Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTopinion), and sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter. David Brooks has been a columnist with The Times since 2003. He is the author of "The Road to Character" and the forthcoming book "The Committed Life: When You Give Yourself Away." A version of this article appears in print on Oct. 18, 2018, on Page A35 of the New York edition with the headline: Neighborhoods Are the Units Of Change READ 289 COMMENTS https : //www. nytimes. com/2018/ 10/ 18lopinionlneighborhood-social-infrastructure-commu... 10/22/2018 Item Number: 4. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Memorandum from City Manager: Sunday Transit Service ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo from City Manager: Sunday Transit Service CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 22, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Re: Sunday Transit Service At the last City Council work session, there was a brief discussion about the feasibility of adding Sunday service prior to the completion of the transit study. During our last budget review in January staff developed a rough estimate of around $800,000 annually. That cost includes new staff and accounts for required paratransit service. The estimate assumes that the Sunday service would mirror current Saturday service levels. If any additional information is required at this time please let me know. Item Number: 5. + r , • yyrrmr�� CITY 0E 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Copy of article from City Manager: Take the bus for free on Election Day in Iowa City ATTACHMENTS: Description Article from City Manager Bus free Election Day Kellie Fruehling From: Geoff Fruin Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:54 AM d To: Kellie Fruehling Subject: FW: Take the bus for free on Election Day in Iowa City For the IP. Thanks— Geoff From: City of Iowa City<Cityoflowa City@ pu bl ic.govde live ry.co m> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 9:31 AM To: Geoff Fruin <Geoff- Fru in@iowa-city.org> Subject: Take the bus for free on Election Day in Iowa City (10 SHARE Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page. �ty°,IOWA CITY FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: 10/23/2018 Contact: Darian Nagle -Damm, Transportation Services Director Phone: 319-356-5156 Take the bus for free on Election Day in Iowa City Iowa City Transit will offer free rides on Election Day, Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018. Polls open at 7 a.m. and close at 9 p.m. "Our goal is to remove transportation as a barrier, and help people get to the polls and exercise their right to vote," Transportation Services Director Darian Nagle-Gamm said. "We never want transportation to be a reason why someone didn't vote." Rides will be free to everyone all day. No proof of voter registration or destination is required to ride for free. The Johnson County Auditor's Office oversees the election process, and provides polling place information, sample ballots, absentee ballot request forms, and election day registration information. Transit riders are encouraged to locate their polling place before boarding the bus. Riders who need help determining the best route to take are encouraged to use Google Transit to plan their trip, or call Iowa City Transit at 319-356-5151. Note, Iowa City Transit does not directly serve Terry Trueblood Recreation Area, the location of precinct 10. Voters assigned to this polling place are encouraged to call a cab company or ride share service. Early Voting Early voting is underway with many satellite locations available throughout the community. View the schedule online on the Johnson County Auditor's website. Meet the Candidates City Channel 4, the government access station for the City of Iowa City, provides local candidates an opportunity to visit the studio and record a statement of five minutes or less to introduce themselves and share their positions on issues. View statements and candidate forums at citychannel4.com/mtc.html. More information For election information call the Johnson County Auditor at 319-356-356-6004. For Transit questions, call 319-356-5151, or visit icgov.ore/Transit. STAY CONNECTED: Ma IN IMV SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Preferences I Unsubscribe I Help This email was sent to geoff-fruin(a)iowa-citv.org using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: City of Iowa City .410 E Washington Street - Iowa City, IA 52240 Item Number: 6. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Copy of article from City Manager: When Many College Students Live Off Campus, Poverty Rate Goes Up ATTACHMENTS: Description Article from Uty Manager College Students From City Manager Fruin Census.gov /America Counts: Stories Behind the Numbers / When Many College Students Live Off Campus, Poverty Rate Goes Up When Many College Students Live Off Campus, Poverty Rate Goes Up Small and Large College Towns See Higher Poverty Rates Craig Benson and Alemayehu Bishaw October 22, 2018 Both in small counties with a large university and in large counties with multiple universities, the presence of college students who live off campus raises the community's poverty rate. Previous research showed smaller communities were more likely to have poverty rates affected by students who live off campus. But new findings show a similar impact in some of the largest counties in the United States that are home to multiple colleges and universities. Using updated American Community Survey 2012-2016 estimates, Census Bureau researchers found that in a number of areas, the inclusion of off -campus students had a statistically significant effect on local poverty rates, in some cases increasing the rate by 10 or more percentage points. poverty rates. The list of all counties and places with more than 10,000 residents where the presence of off -campus students significantly impacts poverty rates can be found in two tables here. Students living on campus are not included in the poverty universe and therefore do not impact poverty rates. Off -Campus Students Push Poverty Rate Up in 211 Counties Of the 2,437 counties in the United States with populations above 10,000, 211 counties (8.7 percent) had statistically significant decreases in their poverty rate when off - campus college students are excluded. None of the counties saw their poverty rates increase in that scenario. The research clearly shows that large counties feel the impact. In fact, 87 of the 100 largest colleges and universities based on on-site enrollment are located within these 211 counties. Census.gov /America Counts: Stories Behind the Numbers / When Many College Students Live Off Campus, Poverty Rate Goes Up Mapping Counties Where Off -Campus College Students Affect Poverty Rates Counties With Populations of 10,000 or More and Statistically Significant Differences in Poverty Rates With Exclusion of Off -Campus College Students. 2012-2016 U 0,. I G:' e t,3 4, W rJ :� NDk CA-CamNustdk�geBkWEr/tlife defrreamsluaernswnaweenroneuin C010gCand IMG wnPH-campoa hgu5ing we n4 ir.WCOfamlly Wr CrS Sada e US ce+lsus euneau. 2016 American Colnmunlly Survey 5 -year eshm aces Fol more rrtoma" see Census qmrac s Fwcantag* paint decline 10-11 urmote 54-99 26 49 I Lara tnii%2!, The map and detailed tables online display all counties with populations above 10,000 that had statistically significant differences between their original poverty rates and their rates when adjusted to exclude college students living off campus. The map shows where the 211 counties with statistically significant changes are located. The majority of these counties had decreases of 5 percentage points or less (157 counties or 74.4 percent of all counties that experienced a decline). A smaller number of counties had a 10 percentage point or more decrease from the original poverty rate (16 counties or 7.6 percent of all counties that experienced a decline). Counties with the largest differences tended to have smaller total populations. An additional table shows places with populations greater than 10,000 people that had statistically significant differences between their original and adjusted poverty rates: • Of these 3,943 places, 226 (5.7 percent) had significant declines in poverty rates with the exclusion of off -campus college students. Census.gov /America Counts: Stories Behind the Numbers / When Many College Students Live Off Campus, Poverty Rate Goes Up • Of the 100 largest on-site enrollment colleges and universities, 81 were located in places that showed a significant impact of college students on poverty rates. This new research can stimulate further thought about how college students impact poverty rates, and how those estimates might be interpreted in college towns. Craig Benson and Alemayehu Bishaw are Survey Statisticians in the Census Bureau's Poverty Statistics Branch. Table 2. Places with Populations of 10,000 or More and Statistically Significant Differences in Poverty Rates with Exclusion of Off -Campus College Students: 2012-2016 Pov rates Total number Percent off - Places of people in campus All a �o� All people excluding off- Differences Poverty college campus college students universe' students' Estimate MOE Estimate MOE Estimate MOE Auburn city, Alabama 55,657 23.9 3D.8 2.4 16.0 2.5 14.8 3.4 Jacksonville city, Alabama 11,234 13.5 26.3 3.6 20.2 4.0 6.1 5.5 Troy city, Alabama 17,103 15.4 31.9 4.9 22.0 5.1 9.9 7.1 Tuscaloosa city, Alabama 86,651 8.4 23.9 1.7 19.1 1.6 4.8 2.4 Flagstaff city, Arizona 58,811 14.4 23.3 2.0 15.5 2.2 7.8 2.9 Tempe city, Arizona 164,090 14.2 21.6 1.2 14.9 1.2 6.7 1.7 Tucson city, Arizona 504,069 5.4 25.1 0.7 23.0 0.7 2.1 0.9 Conway city, Arkansas 59,409 7.8 18.8 2.1 14.8 1.9 4.0 2.9 Fayetteville city, Arkansas 73,675 16.0 24.9 1.7 15.5 1.8 9.4 2.4 Arcata city, California 15,949 28.6 40.1 4.3 25.8 4.6 14.3 6.3 Berkeley city, California 106,786 17.9 19.9 1.1 11.1 1.0 8.8 1.4 Chico city, California 86,422 14.4 25.2 1.4 17.0 1.4 8.2 2.1 Davis city, California 64,848 28.9 28.8 1.7 10.1 1.5 18.7 2.2 Fullerton city, California 136,540 4.9 1S.3 1.5 12.8 1.5 2.5 2.1 Irvine city, California 239,603 6.8 12.7 1.3 8.3 1.2 4A 1.7 Isla Vista CDP, California 16,987 76.3 67.3 3.3 34.2 5.8 33.1 6.6 Los Angeles city, California 3,850,742 2.5 21.5 0.3 20.6 0.3 09 0.5 Monterey city, California 26,146 6.1 8.6 1.7 6.2 1.4 2.4 2.2 Pleasant Hill city, California 33,998 4.1 8.1 1.8 5.7 1S 2.4 2.3 Riverside city, California 307,720 2.9 17.8 1.0 16.3 1.0 1.5 1.4 Rohnert Park city, California 41,861 8.2 15.S 2.1 10.9 1.9 4.6 2.9 San Diego city, California 1,343,005 4.4 15.0 0.3 13.2 0.3 1.8 0.5 San Francisco city, California 836,561 4.5 12.5 0.4 10.6 0.4 1.9 0.5 San Jose dry, California 998,828 1.9 10.9 0.4 10.2 0.4 0.7 0Z San Luis Obispo city, California 45,669 28.5 32.7 2.1 12.2 1.9 205 2.8 Santa Barbara city, California 90,184 5.5 13.9 1.3 11.7 1.4 2.2 2.0 Santa Clara city, California 118,533 3.1 8.2 0.9 6.4 0.8 1.6 1.3 Santa Cruz city, California 54,180 15.9 24.1 2.0 15.0 2.0 9.1 2.8 Stanford CDP, California 7,048 37.3 21.0 4.6 7.6 3.9 13A 6.1 (Boulder city, Colorado 95,728 19.8 22.0 1.1 9.7 1.1 12.3 1.6 Denver city, Colorado 650,979 3.5 16.4 0.5 15.6 0.5 0.8 0.7 Fort Collins city, Colorado 149,383 13.5 17.8 0.9 10.1 0.9 7.7 1.3 Golden city, Colorado 17,500 15.0 18.2 3.1 9.6 3.0 8.4 4.3 Greeley city, Colorado 92,986 5.0 19.0 1.2 16.1 1.3 2.9 1.7 Storrs CDP, Connecticut 3,173 54.7 41.3 7.5 4.9 3.6 36.4 8.4 Newark city, Delaware 25,901 23.3 24.8 2.6 9.1 2.0 15.7 3.3 Washington city, District of Columbia 624,954 4.9 17.9 0.5 16.4 0.5 1.5 0.7 Coral Gables city, Florida 45,990 3.7 7.5 1.1 5.9 1.1 1.6 1.6 Gainesville city, Florida 114,251 23.6 34.8 1.7 22.6 2.1 12.2 2.8 Goldenrod CDP, Florida 12,541 9.3 20.3 3.9 14.6 3.5 5.7 5.2 Tallahassee city, Florida 176,700 19.1 28A 1.2 18.3 1.2 10.1 1.6 University CDP (Hillsborough County), Florida 42,938 16.4 39.8 2.7 35.1 3.2 4.7 4.2 University CDP (Orange County), Florida 18,096 19.8 33.1 4.5 21.9 4.5 11.2 6.5 Athens -Clarke County unVkd government (balance), Georgia 130,507 17.0 35S 1.4 26.7 1.5 8.8 2.1 Atlanta city, Georgia 427,106 4.6 24.0 0.9 22.6 1.0 1.4 1.3 Carrollton city, Georgia 22,567 9.3 25.8 3.8 20A 3.7 5.4 5.2 Druid Hills CDP, Georgia 8,751 9.3 13.7 3.0 7.6 2.8 6.1 4.1 Milledgeville city, Georgia 15,678 18.9 43.3 4.7 33.2 5.3 10.1 7.0 North Decatur CDP, Georgia 16,515 8.6 15.4 3.3 10.5 2.8 4.9 4.3 Savannah city, Georgia 134,116 4.8 25.4 1.4 23A 1.4 2.0 1.9 Statesboro city, Georgia 24,505 27.9 51.5 3.6 37A 4.3 14.1 5.6 Valdosta city, Georgia 54,607 9.8 33.7 2.6 29.3 2.8 4.4 3.8 Urban Honolulu CDP, Hawaii 338,448 3.0 12.1 0.6 11.1 0.6 1.0 0.8 Boise City city, Idaho 215,628 4.4 14.1 0.9 11.9 0.9 2.2 1.2 Moscow city, Idaho 21,617 22.2 29.9 3.0 17.2 3.0 12.7 4.2 Rexburg city, Idaho 26,450 17.7 43.2 3.0 33.5 3.8 9.7 4.8 Carbondale city, Illinois 22,302 32.5 44.4 3.4 28.7 4.1 15.7 5.4 Champaign city, Illinois 76,539 18.5 25.8 1.4 14.4 1.5 11A 2.1 Charleston city, Illinois 17,852 21.0 33.0 4.0 20.8 4.2 12.2 5.8 Chicago city, Illinois 2,639,031 3.0 21.7 0.3 20.8 0.3 0.9 0.5 DeKelb city, Illinois 38,210 17.7 30.8 2.7 21.8 3.3 9.0 4.3 Edwardsville dry, Illinois 22,029 12.8 13.7 2.3 4.9 1.8 8,8 2.9 Evanston city, Illinois 68,487 7.8 13.7 1.5 9.1 1.4 4.6 2.0 Macomb city, Illinois 14,843 18.8 33.6 3.3 22.6 3.1 11.0 45 Normal town, Illinois 49,349 20.7 22.2 2.1 7.3 1.8 14.9 2.8 Urbana city, Illinois 34,724 29.9 34.0 2.4 18.6 2.7 15.4 3.7 Bloominewn city, Indiana 68,625 29.1 38.0 1.7 21.3 1.8 16.7 2.4 Muncie city, Indiana 62,754 13.1 30.9 1.9 23.7 1.9 7.2 2.7 West Lafayette city, Indiana 30,937 41S 41.0 2.7 16.1 3.1 24.9 4.1 Ames city, Iowa 55,100 31.6 30.1 1.6 8.S 1.5 21.6 2.2 Table 2. Places with Populations of 10,000 or More and Statistically Significant Differences in Poverty Rates with Exclusion of Off -Campus College Students: 2012-2016 Pov Total number Percent off. Places ofpeoc' in a us An p�Pie Poverty college campus college students universe' Students' Estimate MOE Esemate MOE Estimate MOE Cedar falls city, Iowa 36,382 15A 18.5 2.1 8.7 1.9 9.8 2.8 Iowa City city, Iowa 65,497 22.9 28.0 1.8 13.1 1.8 14.9 2.6 Hays city, Kansas 19,951 12.1 17.5 3.5 10.6 2.5 6.9 4.2 Lawrence city, Kansas 84,591 14.9 22.3 1.6 13.5 1.6 8.8 2A Manhattan city, Kansas 49,979 23A 24.9 1.9 10.1 1.7 14.8 2A Pittsburg city, Kansas 18,675 16.9 29A 2.5 20.1 2.8 9.3 3.7 Bowling Green city, Kentucky 55,670 7.7 28.5 2.1 25.4 2.2 3.1 3.0 Lexington -Fayette urban county, Kentucky 296,147 6.7 18.9 0.7 15.5 0.7 3A 0.9 Murray city, Kentucky 15,242 15.6 39.2 3.9 29.3 4.6 8.9 6.1 Richmond city, Kentucky 28,973 13.1 32.6 3.7 26.2 3.8 6.4 5.4 Baton Rouge city, Louisiana 220,605 7.9 26.1 1.3 22.0 1.3 4.1 1.9 Lafayette city, Louisiana 121,472 4.7 19.0 1.4 16.7 i.s 2.3 2.0 Natchitoches tiny, Louisiana 17,630 13.7 40.4 4,8 32.1 5.3 8.3 7.1 New Orleans city, Louisiana 371,081 3.3 26.2 0.7 25.2 0.7 1.0 0.9 Ruston city, Louisiana 20,078 22.5 43.0 4.3 30.7 4.9 12.3 6.5 College Park city, Maryland 20,683 26.6 27.3 3.4 11.5 3.7 15.8 5.1 Salisbury city, Maryland 31,217 12.5 27.8 3.1 21.9 3.2 5.9 4.5 Towson CDP, Maryland 49,372 8.3 12.8 1.4 8.0 1.4 4.8 1.9 Amherst Center CDP, Massachusetts 6,873 37.0 41.9 6.7 15.7 5.4 26.2 8.7 Boston city, Massachusetts 614,857 6.9 21.1 0.5 18.5 OS 2.6 0.7 Brookline CDP, Massachusetts 57,640 9.5 12.4 1.3 7.8 1.1 4.6 1.7 Cambridge city, Massachusetts 92,146 9.6 14.0 0.9 10.8 0.9 3.2 1.3 Medford city, Massachusetts 54,866 5.7 10.5 1.5 7.7 1.2 2.8 1.9 Somerville city, Massachusetts 76,933 8.3 13.3 1.5 11.0 1.5 2.3 2.1 Allendale CDP, Michigan 15,209 22.8 27.6 4.1 10.7 3.9 16.9 5.7 Ann Arbor city, Michigan 107,386 23.3 23A 1.1 10.6 1.1 12.8 1.6 Auburn Hills city, Michigan 20,825 8.2 12.9 2.0 8.2 1.8 4.7 2.7 Big Rapids tiny, Michigan 7,626 28.0 44.0 5.1 33.8 6.3 10.2 8.1 East Lansing city, Michigan 32,245 44.4 44.2 2.3 16.1 2.6 28.1 3.5 Grand Rapids city, Michigan 186,973 5.0 25.1 1.2 23.2 1.2 1.9 1.6 Kalamazoo city, Michigan 68,565 15.3 32.7 2.0 25.4 2.0 7.3 2.8 Marquette city, Michigan 17,268 17.7 25.4 2.6 15.2 2.6 10.2 3.7 Mount Pleasant city, Michigan 19,589 31.4 41.0 2.7 22.2 2.7 18.8 3.7 Okemos CDP, Michigan 22,082 10.4 12.5 1.7 5.5 1.4 7.0 2.1 Ypsilanti city, Michigan 17,532 22.3 31.3 2.6 25A 3.0 5.9 4.0 Duluth city, Minnesota 80,590 9.3 21.0 1.1 15.8 1.1 5.2 1.6 Mankato city, Minnesota 37,721 19.7 24.6 1.9 12.6 1.6 12.0 2.6 Minneapolis city, Minnesota 389,009 6.6 21.3 0.7 18.7 0.7 2.6 1.2 Moorhead city, Minnesota 37,390 6.3 14.9 2.2 10.8 2.1 4.1 3.1 St. Cloud city, Minnesota 62,173 10.7 23.2 1.8 17.9 1.7 5.3 2.4 St. Paul city, Minnesota 289,516 3.9 21.6 0.8 20.3 0.8 1.3 1.2 Winona city, Minnesota 23,466 12.8 19.5 2.2 11.3 2.1 8.2 3.0 Oxford clty, Mississippi 20,918 27.0 37.3 3.2 19.3 4.1 18.0 5.3 Starkville city, Mississippi 23,436 18.6 33.1 3.6 23.0 3.8 10.1 5.2 Cape Girardeau city, Missouri 36,227 11.7 24.4 1.9 16.8 2.1 7.6 2.8 Clayton city, Missouri 11,740 6.9 9.2 2.2 5.7 1.7 3.5 2.7 Columbia city, Missouri 108,089 16.4 23.6 1.3 13.1 1.3 10.5 1.9 Kirksville city, Missouri 14,903 21.0 33.5 3.3 18.7 3.1 14.8 4.5 Maryville city, Missouri 9,477 18.2 32.5 4.8 23.2 4.8 9.3 6.7 Rolla city, Missouri 17,364 17.9 28.9 3.4 19.1 3.6 9.8 5.0 Springfield city, Missouri 154,479 7.9 25.9 1.2 22.0 1.3 3.9 1.7 University City city, Missouri 34,741 7.8 16.5 2.5 12.4 2.3 4.1 3.4 Warrensburg city, Missouri 16,829 17.6 27.9 3.5 16.5 3.3 11.4 4.8 Bozeman city, Montana 38,500 16.4 20.7 1.7 11.8 1.4 8.9 2.2 Missoula city, Montana 67,254 9.0 19.3 1.8 15.5 1.7 3.8 2.4 Kearney city, Nebraska 30,417 8.5 16.5 1.8 11.3 1.7 5.2 2.4 Lincoln city, Nebraska 259,989 6.0 155 0.7 12.5 0.7 3.0 0.9 Omaha city, Nebraska 432,041 3.1 16.3 0.7 15.4 0.7 0.9 0.9 Reno city, Nevada 232,750 4.7 18A 0.9 16.6 0.9 1.8 1.4 Durham CDP, New Hampshire 4,227 37.6 32.8 6.0 4.5 2.6 28.3 6.5 Glassboro borough, New Jersey 16,825 9.5 19.9 3.9 13.4 3.4 6.5 5.2 Hoboken city, New Jersey 51,643 4.9 10.5 1.4 79 1.3 2.6 2.0 New Brunswick city, New Jersey 48,437 10.2 36.0 3.2 305 3.4 5.5 4.8 Albany city, New York 89,256 9.0 25.6 1.7 21A 1.6 4.2 2.3 Binghamton city, New York 44,478 8.9 33.6 2.5 29.7 2.4 3.9 3.5 Cortland city, New York 15,963 11.3 22.4 2.6 15.7 2.3 6.7 3.5 Ithaca city, New York 22,524 43.1 44.8 3.9 23.2 3.6 21.6 5.4 New York city, New York 8,325,859 1.7 20.3 0.2 19.8 0.2 0.5 0.2 Oneonta city, New York 9,305 20.4 29.0 3.8 14.0 3.0 15.0 4.9 Oswego city, New York 17,101 9.8 28.9 3.3 23.3 3.4 5.6 4.7 Syracuse city, New York 130,985 6.6 33.6 1.2 31.2 1.2 2.4 1.7 Table 2. Places with Populations of 10,000 or More and Statistically Significant Differences In Poverty Rates with Exclusion of Off -Campus College Students: 2012-2016 Poverl V rates Total number Percent off - Places of people in poverty campus college Alleo le P p All people excluding off- campus college students Differences universe' students: Estimate MOE Eallmate MOE Estimate MOE Boone town, North Carolina 13,017 57.2 62.2 3.8 20.0 5.0 42.2 6.2 Chapel HIII town, North Carolina 49,263 16.3 20.1 1.3 9.2 1.2 10.9 1.7 Charlotte city, North Carolina 796,364 2.8 15.8 O.S 14.8 0.5 1.0 0.7 Durham city, North Carolina 242,390 4.7 18.5 0.9 17.1 0.9 1.4 1.2 Greensboro city, North Carolina 270,558 4.0 19.9 0.9 18.2 1.0 1.7 1.4 Greenville city, North Carolina 84,006 19.1 32.0 1.8 22A 2.1 9.6 2.8 Raleigh city, North Carolina 421,193 4.7 14.9 0.7 12.8 0.7 2.1 0.9 Wilmington city, North Carolina 109,219 7.8 22.9 SA 19.1 1.2 3.8 1.9 Fargo city, North Dakota 111,350 8.6 14.6 1.1 10.8 1.1 3.8 1.6 Grand Forks city, North Dakota 51,944 11.6 20.6 2.0 14.2 2.0 6.4 2.8 Athens city, Ohio 16,028 46.7 54.7 3.5 29.3 5.8 25.4 6.8 Bowling Green city, Ohio 25,442 27.6 35.8 2.6 16.9 2.9 18.9 3.8 Cincinnati city, Ohio 286,411 5.5 29.9 0.9 28.2 0.9 1.7 1.2 Columbus city, Ohio 813,793 4.9 21.2 0.5 195 0.6 1.7 0.7 Kent city, Ohio 24,830 21.7 34.4 3.8 25.2 4.6 9.2 6.0 Oxford city, Ohio 14,232 45.1 46.1 3.7 16.1 4.5 30.D 5.8 Edmond city, Oklahoma 86,693 4.6 10.0 1.1 7.5 1.0 2.5 1.5 Norman city, Oklahoma 110,674 11.7 17.9 1.5 12.7 1.4 5.2 2.1 Stillwater city, Oklahoma 40,804 23.2 34.3 2.5 20.9 2.8 13.4 3.7 Weatherford city, Oklahoma 10,681 11.7 20.1 4.6 12.5 3.8 7.6 6.0 Corvallis city, Oregon SD,561 21.8 27.5 1.6 14.3 1.6 13.2 2.3 Eugene city, Oregon 155,761 11.6 23.1 1.1 16.2 1.2 6.9 1.6 Portland city, Oregon 607,149 4.5 16.9 0.6 15.4 0.6 1.5 0.7 Bloomsburg town, Pennsylvania 10,599 23.6 31.4 4.7 12.9 3.2 18.5 5.7 East Stroudsburg borough, Pennsylvania 8,701 14.4 26.4 5.6 15.8 5.2 10.6 7.7 Indiana borough, Pennsylvania 9,873 395 42.6 4.2 13.3 3.7 29.3 55 Philadelphia city, PennsyMnia 1,517,069 3.3 25.9 0.5 24.9 0.5 1.0 0.7 Pittsburgh city, Pennsylvania 282,147 8.7 22.3 0.7 18.6 0.7 3.7 0.9 State college borough, Pennsylvania 29,706 48.0 44.8 2.8 16.2 3.0 28.6 4.2 West Chester borough, Pennsylvania 16,093 25.5 28.4 3.2 12.8 3.2 15.6 4.5 Cayce city, South Carolina 13,644 12.0 22.1 3.2 15.5 3.3 6.6 4.5 Charleston city, South Carolina 124,232 7.0 16.3 1.2 12.4 1.2 3.9 1.6 Clemson city, South Carolina 14,913 41.2 40.2 3.8 12.4 45 27.8 5.8 Columbia city, South Carolina 104,194 9.5 22.9 1.3 19.5 1.3 3.4 1.9 Brookings city, South Dakota 19,855 19.1 19.5 2.6 9.7 2.4 9.8 3.6 Vermillion city, South Dakota 8,645 25.1 35.7 4.6 22.0 6.0 13.7 7.6 Cookeville city, Tennessee 29,461 9.7 31.1 2.9 25.8 3.1 5.3 4.3 Johnson City city, Tennessee 61,886 5.9 22.3 2.2 19.0 2.2 3.3 3.1 Knoxville city, Tennessee 175,507 7.2 26.5 1.0 23.4 1.1 3.1 1.5 Martin city, Tennessee 8,617 16.6 30.8 3.6 20.7 3.7 10.1 5.2 Murfreesboro city, Tennessee 117,671 7.4 16.0 1.4 12.0 1.3 4.0 2.0 Austin city, Texas 886,574 5.7 16.7 0.5 14.4 0.5 2.3 0.7 Bryan city, Texas 77,083 7.6 24A 2.0 21.0 2.0 3A 2.8 College Station city, Texas 93,474 30.8 33.1 1.6 15.0 1.7 18.1 2.3 Denton city, Texas 117,467 12.3 19.S 1.5 13.3 1.5 6.2 2.1 Huntsville city, Texas 26,126 22.2 36A 3.0 23.2 3.6 13.2 4.7 Lubbock city, Texas 233,397 8.7 20.9 1.2 16.4 1.3 4.5 1.9 Richardson city, Texas 107,196 4.2 10.4 1.2 8.0 1.2 2.4 1.6 San Antonio city, Texas 1,415,593 2.4 19.5 0.5 18.8 0.5 0.7 0.7 San Marcos city, Texas 51,349 26.8 35.8 3.0 23.4 3.7 12A 4.7 Stephenville city, Texas 17,852 19.9 28.6 4.2 15.5 4.4 13.1 6.2 University Park city, Texas 21,753 3.2 4.2 1.2 2.4 1.1 1.8 1.6 Wacoclty,Texas 122,533 8.6 275 1.5 225 1.6 5.0 2.1 Logan city, Utah 46,496 11.8 25.4 2.3 19.7 2.2 5.7 3.3 Provo city, Utah 106,805 14.6 27.2 1.4 18.6 1.6 8.6 2.2 Salt Lake City city, Utah 187,111 6.4 19.1 1.3 16.8 1.2 2.3 1.9 Burlington city, Vermont 35,861 14.6 25.1 2.0 16.8 2.3 8.3 3.0 Arlington CDP, Virginia 223,272 4.3 8.7 0.8 7.6 0.7 1.1 1.1 Blacksburg town, Virginia 35,266 43.9 44.7 2.7 17.2 3.2 27.5 4.1 Charlottesville city, Virginia 43,056 16.6 25.9 1.6 15.8 1.9 10.1 2.6 Fairfax city, Virginia 22,969 5.0 6.2 1.2 3.6 1.0 2.6 1.6 Harrisonburg city, Virginia 44,594 21.9 33.1 2.2 17.8 2.8 15.3 3.5 Lynchburg city, Virginia 68,212 6.8 24.3 1.8 20.6 1.9 3.7 2.6 Norfolk city, Virginia 220,103 4.8 21.0 0.9 19.3 0.9 1.7 1.3 Radford city, Virginia 14,186 29.4 39.3 4.3 19.5 5.5 19.8 6.9 Richmond city,Vlrginis 206,181 5.7 25A 0.9 23.5 0.9 1.9 1.3 Williamsburg city, Virginia 10,868 17.2 22.8 4.0 9.8 2.9 13.0 4.9 Bellingham city, Washington 79,520 12.6 22.2 1.6 1S.0 SA 7.2 2.2 Cheney city, Washington 9,685 31.4 39.6 4.4 20.0 4A 19.6 6,3 Ellensburg city, Washington 16,519 23.8 36.7 3.7 21.4 4.0 15.3 5.4 Pullman city, Washington 25,718 37.2 40.8 2.6 18.4 3.2 22.4 4.2 Table 2. Places with Populations of 10,000 or More and Statistically Significant Differences in Poverty Rates with Exclusion of Off-Campus College Students: 2012-2016 Poverl 0 rates Total number Percent off- Places of people In campus All people All people excluding off. Differences poverty college campus college students universe" students= Estimate MOE Estimate MOE Estimate MO14.7 Seattle city, Washington 650,583 5.6 13.0 0.4 10.7 0.4 2.3 Huntington city, West Virginia 45,672 7.6 30.8 2.0 26.6 2.0 4.2 Morgantown city, West Virginia 24,089 28.6 35.3 3.5 16.9 3.2 18.4 Eau Claire city, Wisconsin 63,573 9.5 17.7 1.3 11.9 1.3 5.8 la Crosse city, Wisconsin 47,549 16.1 25.6 2.3 16.2 2.1 9.4 Madison city, Wisconsin 234,657 13.0 18.6 0.7 11.2 0.8 7.4 1.1 Menomonie city, Wisconsin 12,975 21.0 26.1 4.0 16.6 4.5 9.3 6.1 Milwaukee city, Wisconsin 582,489 3.6 28.4 0.6 27.3 0.6 1.1 0.9 Oshkosh city, Wisconsin 59,183 8.0 19.5 1.6 14.5 1.5 5.0 2.2 Platteville city, Wisconsin 9,240 25.4 33.0 3.8 17.3 4.7 15.7 6.1 River Falls city, Wisconsin 12,725 16.5 19.6 2.9 9.0 2.6 10.6 4.0 Stevens Point city, Wisconsin 23,434 16.5 24.8 2.0 13.8 2.2 11.0 2.9 Whitewater city, Wisconsin 11,000 31.9 38.2 3.2 18.1 3.8 20.1 4.9 Laramie city, Wyoming 29,870 1 23.41 28.81 2.0 16.31 2.31 12.51 3.0 Source: U. 5. Census Bureau, 2016 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. For more information on the ACS, see census.gov/acs. Note: MOE Is margin of error. This number when added to and subtracted from the estimate forms the 90 percent confidence interval. Margin of errors are based on standard errors associated with any sample. 1 Poverty status is determined for individuals in housing units and noninsdtutional group quarters. The poverty universe excludes children under age 15 who are not related to the housholder, people living in Institutional group quarters, and people living In college dormitories or military barracks. ' Off-campus college students Include all students who are enrolled in college, not living with their families, and not living in college dormitoires. Item Number: 7. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Memorandum from City Clerk: Proposed Council Meeting Schedule, January - April 2019 ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo from City Clerk Meeting Schedule CITY OF IOWA CITY .k MEMORANDUM DATE: October 30, 2018 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk RE: Proposed Council Meeting Schedule, January — April 2019 Below is a proposed meeting schedule (January thru April) for discussion at your work session on November 6. Please check your calendars and let me know if you'd like to make any changes in the proposal. Saturday, January 5, Budget Work Session, 8:00 AM Tuesday, January 8, Work Session, 5:00 PM January 8, Formal 7:00 PM Monday, January 14, Reception, 4:00 PM January 14, Joint Entities Meeting, 4:30 PM Tuesday, January 16, Budget Work Session (CIP), 1:00 PM Tuesday, January 22, Work Session, 5:00 PM January 22, Formal 7:00 PM Tuesday, February 5, Work Session, 5:00 PM February 5, Formal, 7:00 PM Tuesday, February 19, Work Session, 5:00 PM February 19, Formal 7:00 PM Tuesday, March 5, Work Session, 5:00 PM March 5, Formal 7:00 PM Tuesday, March 19, Work Session, 5:00 PM March 19, Formal 7:00 PM Tuesday, April 2, Work Session, 5:00 PM April 2, Formal 7:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, Work Session, 5:00 PM April 16, Formal 7:00 PM S:clk/TENTATIVESCHEDULE/SCHEDULE PROPOSED 2019 (JAN-APR.).doc Item Number: 8. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Memorandum from City Clerk: KXIC Radio Show ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo from City �,;lerk KXI C Radio Show �_,---I.®4, CITY OF IOWA CITY ®�� M EMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Re: KXIC Radio Show At your October 16 work session, Council Members agreed to the following schedule for the Wednesday 8:20 AM radio show. Wednesdav October 31 — Thomas November 7 — Mims November 14 - Throgmorton November 21 -Taylor November 28 — City staff December 5 — Thomas December 12 - Teague December 19 - Cole December 26 — City staff January 2 — Taylor January 9 - Cole January 16 - Thomas January 23 - Mims January 30 — City staff ** Please remember that KXIC is very flexible with taping the sessions ahead of the show. &CIk/Council KXIC Radio Schedule/radioshowasking.doc Item Number: 9. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Memorandum from Neighborhood Services Coordinator: Aid to Agencies - Emerging Agencies Audit Policy ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo from Neighborhood Services Coordinator It �.®fir CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 22, 2018 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Re: Aid to Agencies — Emerging Agencies Audit Policy Background: On July 17, 2018, City Council approved changes to the Aid to Agency (A2A) allocation process. To create funding stability, the City will move to a two-year cycle for funding "Legacy" agencies through the United Way Joint Funding Process. Legacy agencies are those who have received A2A funding in at least two of the last five years of funding. New or "Emerging" agencies will have access to a limited pool of funding that can be applied for annually through the City. The set-aside for Emerging agencies is 5% of the A2A budget, estimated at $15,000- $20,000 each year. While reviewing these changes, Council requested staff to create an audit policy that would hold agencies accountable for their use of taxpayer dollars, yet not be overly expensive or burdensome for smaller organizations that will be applying for Emerging Agency funds. Currently, agencies who receive A2A funding are required to provide an annual accounting and beneficiary report at the end of the fiscal year describing, at minimum, the uses of funds received during the prior year. The Agreement also authorizes representatives of the City to have access to each agency's financial records. As the A2A budget includes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for public services, staff completes end of year, on-site monitoring of those agencies annually. Discussion of Solutions: To assist in formulating an audit policy, staff reviewed the Iowa City Downtown (SSMID) District's operating agreement and United Way's partner agreement to review their audit policies. Iowa City Downtown District (SSMID) The Iowa City Downtown District's operating agreement requires an annual report to be prepared by a certified public accountant that reviews the financial condition of the agency in accordance with Financial Review Procedures. The Financial Review Procedures detail specific steps that must be taken annually such as confirming bank balances directly with the bank, reviewing and reconciling a selection of payments and disbursements, and ensuring proper documentation. If the report includes a negative finding, the City may require a full audit at the expense of the agency. United Way of Johnson & Washington Counties The United Way partner agreement requires an audit or review by an independent certified public accountant in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GARS). The following requirements apply based on the agency's total annual budget: • Less than $100,000 — in house year-end financial statement signed by the partner agency director and board president. • $100,001-$499,999 — review by a certified public accountant annually 0 $500,000 and over — Audit level statement annually. October 22, 2018 Page 2 Recommendation: Staff recommends adopting an audit procedure that mirrors the United Way partner agreement, requiring different levels of audit based on the agency's total annual budget. This will ensure that tax dollars are going towards the intended purpose, but will not create an overly burdensome requirement for smaller agencies. Additionally, if agencies receive funding from the United Way Joint Funding Process, the audit requirements for the City and United Way will be consistent. If Council supports this recommendation, the new guidelines will be implemented beginning with the FY20 Aid to Agency funding allocation. Item Number: 10. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Quarterly Investment Report: July 1, 2018 to September 30, 2018 ATTACHMENTS: Description uuarieny I nvesimene Report July 1, 2018 to W111WIWO, Finance Department Prepared by: Brian Cover Senior Accountant The City of Iowa City's investment objectives are safety, liquidity and yield. The primary objective of the City of Iowa City's investment activities is the preservation of capital and the protection of investment principal. The City's investment portfolio remains sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet operating requirements that cash management procedures anticipate. In investing public funds, the City's cash management portfolio is designed with the objective of regularly exceeding the average return on the six month U.S. Treasury Bill. The Treasury Bill is considered a benchmark for riskless investment transactions and therefore comprises a minimum standard for the portfolio's rate of return. Since the city's investments are mostly between the six month and twelve month range, the yield curve for the twelve month U.S. Treasury Bill has been added to the chart. The rolling average return on the six month U.S. Treasury Bill for the prior 365 days was 1.867% and the twelve month return was 2.047%. The investment program seeks to achieve returns above this threshold, consistent with risk limitations and prudent investment principles. The rate of return on the City's entire portfolio for the quarter was 1.861%. (See exhibit A) Investments purchased by the City of Iowa City for the first quarter of this fiscal year had an average return of 2.169%. Rates on new investment purchases in our operating cash portfolio for the first quarter were 92 basis points higher than investments purchased at this time last year. The increase is due to the higher interest rates of the new investments. The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which banks lend to each other. In the September 26 meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee, the decision was made to raise the target range for the federal funds rate to 2.25 percent. The Committee expects that further gradual increases in the target range for the federal funds rate will be consistent with sustained expansion of economic activity, strong labor market conditions, and inflation near the Committee's symmetric 2 percent objective over the medium term. (See exhibit B) The quarterly investment report lists investments by maturity date, by fund, by institution, and investments purchased and redeemed. New official state interest rates setting the minimum that may be paid by Iowa depositories on public funds in the 180 to 364 day range during this quarter were 0.45% in July, 0.50% in August, and 0.50% in September 2018. 3 I U= :� FL c� , o - 0 C0 3 CN U m a m a 81.�tI r BI.�Ca � o <11 (?" aS, ■ y �l ,��► V 1 a0 t� 9 l��a p s p ` 91•��I >% r aQ aS Ln o Ln o U'3 o N N T O O uanlaa jo GBBIua3aad 3 I aS �ylt OC � aS tt� L Z3 � aS 91. S C16 C- i T . o qje. j Isojejul CITY OF IOWA CITY INVESTMENTS ON HAND DETAIL LISTING BY MATURITY DATE 30 -Sep -18 INSTITUTION FUND INVESTMENT PURCHASE MATURITY INVESTMENT INTEREST NAME TYPE TYPE DATE DATE AMOUNT RATE IPAIT HILLS BANK BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK GREAT WESTERN BANK HILLS BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO PIPER JAFFRAY & CO MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO TWO RIVERS BANK TWO RIVERS BANK MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK UICCU CBI BANK & TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO HILLS BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO TWO RIVERS BANK IPAIT IPAIT MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO PIPER JAFFRAY & CO IPAIT IPAIT IPAIT UICCU PIPER JAFFRAY & CO MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO CR BANK & TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO PIPER JAFFRAY & CO MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO PIPER JAFFRAY & CO NXT BANK MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST GREAT WESTERN BANK MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK CBI BANK & TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST GREAT WESTERN BANK MIDWESTONE BANK TOTAL OPERATING IPAIT 27 -Sep -06 $ 17,409,905.25 1.81 OPERATING MONEY MARKET 30 -Mar -10 $ 98,807.70 0.50 OPERATING SAVINGS 02 -May -17 $ 478,542.63 1.90 OPERATING MONEY MARKET 03 -Oct -17 $ 19,613,465.30 1,87 OPERATING SAVINGS 07 -Jun -18 $ 10,061,758.00 2.20 OPERATING MONEY MARKET 15 -Aug -17 15 -Aug -19 $ 4,000,000.00 1.75 OPERATING NOTE 18 -Oct -17 18 -Oct -22 $ 2,000,000.00 2.00 OPERATING NOTE 30 -Oct -17 30 -Oct -19 $ 2,000,000.00 1.63 OPERATING CD 20 -Nov -17 16 -Nov -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.76 OPERATING CD 20 -Nov -17 26 -Nov -18 $ 2,000,000,00 1.79 OPERATING NOTE 30 -Nov -17 29 -Nov -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.62 OPERATING CD 30 -Nov -17 06 -Dec -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.77 OPERATING CD 30 -Nov -17 29 -Nov -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.77 OPERATING CD 12 -Dec -17 12 -Dec -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1,81 OPERATING CD 12 -Dec -17 19 -Dec -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.84 OPERATING CD 18 -Dec -17 27 -Dec -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.78 OPERATING CD 18 -Dec -17 03 -Jan -19 $ 2,000,000.00 1.81 SEWER CD 22 -Jul -14 24 -Jul -19 $ 2,600,000.00 2.01 WATER CD 03 -Mar -17 01 -Mar -19 $ 2,500,000.00 1.32 HEALTH INSURANCE NOTE 30 -May -17 28 -May -19 $ 2,000,000.00 1.45 HEALTH INSURANCE CD 30 -May -17 30 -Oct -20 $ 2,000,000.00 1.85 EQUIPMENT NOTE 28 -Jun -17 28 -Jun -19 $ 2,000,000.00 1.45 PARKING CD 06 -Nov -17 30 -Jun -19 $ 602,843.00 1.79 2016 CHAUNCEY BONDS CD 16 -Sep -16 18 -Mar -19 $ 2,364,542.00 1,05 2016 CHAUNCEY BONDS CD 16 -Sep -16 15 -Sep -19 $ 2,364,540.00 1.15 OPERATING CD 02 -Jan -18 02 -Jan -19 $ 10,000,000.00 1.75 OPERATING CD 03 -Jan -18 03 -Oct -18 $ 10,000,000.00 1.65 OPERATING COMM PAPER 12 -Feb -18 15 -Oct -18 $ 1,000,000.00 1.86 EQUIPMENT NOTE 15 -Mar -18 15 -Mar -23 $ 2,000,000.00 3.00 OPERATING CD 02 -Feb -18 01 -Oct -18 $ 15,182,377.22 1.94 OPERATING CD 16 -Mar -18 05 -Oct -18 $ 2,000,000.00 2.01 OPERATING CD 16 -Mar -18 12 -Oct -18 $ 2,000,000.00 2.02 OPERATING CD 27 -Mar -18 27 -Mar -19 $ 5,000,000.00 2.25 OPERATING NOTE 04 -Apr -18 28 -Jun -19 $ 1,070,000.00 2.16 OPERATING CD 06 -Apr -18 05 -Oct -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.96 OPERATING CD 13 -Apr -18 12 -Oct -18 $ 2,000,000.00 1.96 OPERATING NOTE 20 -Apr -18 15 -Apr -19 $ 500,000.00 2.16 OPERATING CD 23 -Apr -18 23 -Oct -18 $ 2,022,835.05 2.01 OPERATING NOTE 30 -Apr -18 13 -Sep -19 $ 2,500,000.00 2.40 OPERATING COMM PAPER 08 -May -18 19 -Feb -19 $ 2,000,000.00 2.36 OPERATING CD 03 -May -18 30 -Apr -19 $ 2,000,000.00 2.25 OPERATING COMM PAPER 11 -May -18 09 -Nov -18 $ 2,000,000.00 2.31 LANDFILL NOTE 28 -Jun -18 28 -Jun -21 $ 2,000,000.00 2.75 OPERATING CD 27 -Jun -18 27 -Dec -18 $ 3,000,000.00 2.31 OPERATING CD 01 -Jun -18 01 -Dec -18 $ 5,000,000.00 2.23 OPERATING COMM PAPER 05 -Jul -18 02 -Nov -18 $ 2,000,000.00 2.25 OPERATING COMM PAPER 13 -Jul -18 11 -Jan -19 $ 2,000,000.00 2.42 OPERATING CD 20 -Jul -18 21 -Jan -19 $ 2,000,000.00 2.36 OPERATING NOTE 01 -Aug -18 31 -Oct -18 $ 3,000,000.00 1.96 OPERATING CD 14 -Aug -18 14 -Feb -19 $ 2,000,000.00 2.39 OPERATING CD 14 -Aug -18 14 -Aug -19 $ 2,000,000.00 2.58 SEWER RESERVES CD 20 -Aug -18 16 -Aug -19 $ 910,000.00 2.57 OPERATING CD 22 -Aug -18 22 -Aug -19 $ 4,000,000.00 2.53 OPERATING CD 22 -May -18 22 -Feb -19 $ 4,000,000.00 2.37 OPERATING COMM PAPER 05 -Sep -18 04 -Mar -19 $ 4,000,000.00 2.35 LANDFILL REPLACEMENT RESERVE NOTE 26 -Sep -18 26 -Mar -21 $ 4,000,000.00 2.80 OPERATING CD 07 -Sep -18 07 -Mar -19 $ 4,000,000.00 2.45 OPERATING CD 21 -Sep -18 21 -Mar -19 $ 2,000,000.00 2.43 $199,279,616.15 5 CITY OF IOWA CITY INVESTMENTS ON HAND SUMMARY BY FUND 9/30118 FUND INVESTMENT TYPE AMOUNT ALL OPERATING FUNDS SEWER RESERVE FUND WATER RESERVE FUND • -TF'lND PARKING OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT LANDFILL . CLOSURELANDFILL HEALTH INSURANCE RESERVE FUND GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PROCEEDS TOTAL 9/30/17 INVESTMENT AMOUNT $ 173,937,691.15 $ 157,218,146.76 $ 3,510,000.00 $ 5,125,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 $ - $ 2,000,000.00 $ 602,843.00 $ - $ 4,000,000.00 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 $ $ $ 4,000,000.00 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 4,729,082.00 $ 9,458,166.00 $ 199,279,616.15 $ 188,301,312.76 CITY OF IOWA CITY INVESTMENTS ON HAND LISTING BY INSTITUTION TOTAL $ 199,279,616.15 $ 188,301,312.76 9/30/18 9/30/17 INSTITUTION INVESTMENT INVESTMENT DEPOSITORY NAME AMOUNT AMOUNT LIMIT BANK OF THE WEST $ - $ - $ 75,000,000.00 BANKER'S TRUST $ 478,542.63 $ 559,919.37 $ 20,000,000.00 CBI BANK & TRUST $ 6,500,000.00 $ 10,500,000.00 $ 15,000,000.00 CEDAR RAPIDS BANK & TRUST $ 2,022,835.05 $ 18,000,000.00 $ 50,000,000.00 FARMERS & MERCHANTS SAVINGS BANK $ - $ 250,000.00 $ 15,000,000.00 GREAT WESTERN BANK $ 16,061,758.00 $ - $ 100,000,000.00 HILLS BANK & TRUST $ 6,098,807.70 $ 9,092,362.73 $ 25,000,000.00 IOWA PUBLIC AGENCY INVESTMENT TRUST $ 41,321,364.47 $ 54,661,817.23 N/A MIDWESTONE BANK $ 73,523,465.30 $ 54,000,000.00 $ 100,000,000.00 NXT BANK $ 3,000,000.00 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 10,000,000.00 PIPER JAFFRAY & CO $ 38,070,000.00 $ 19,500,000.00 N/A TWO RIVERS BANK $ 4,602,843.00 $ 6,000,000.00 $ 15,000,000.00 U OF I COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION $ 7,600,000.00 $ 2,600,000.00 $ 50,000,000.00 US BANK $ - $ 10,037,133.39 $ 65,000,000.00 WELLS FARGO SECURITIES $ - $ 500,000.00 N/A WELLS FARGO BANK $ - $ 600,080.04 $ 50,000,000.00 WEST BANK $ - $ - $ 35,000,000.00 TOTAL $ 199,279,616.15 $ 188,301,312.76 CITY OF IOWA CITY INVESTMENT ACTIVITY FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 FUND INVESTMENT PURCHASE MATURITY INVESTMENT INTEREST INSTITUTION TYPE TYPE DATE DATE AMOUNT RATE INVESTMENTS ON HAND AT 6130118 PURCHASES 7101118 TO 9130/18 HILLS BANK IPAIT BANKERS TRUST IPAIT HILLS BANK BANKERS TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK GREAT WESTERN BANK MIDWESTONE BANK BANKERS TRUST BANKERS TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST IPAIT IPAIT MIDWESTONE BANK GREAT WESTERN BANK MIDWESTONE BANK MIDWESTONE BANK IPAIT BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK CBI BANK & TRUST GREAT WESTERN BANK BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK HILLS BANK IPAIT BANKERS TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST IPAIT GREAT WESTERN BANK IPAIT IPAIT BANKERS TRUST IPAIT BANKERS TRUST BANKERS TRUST IPAIT MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST GREAT WESTERN BANK BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK IPAIT IPAIT HILLS BANK TOTAL PURCHASES $ 210,981,557.14 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 01 -Jul -18 $ 41.89 OPERATING IPAIT 02 -Jul -18 $ 20,957.04 OPERATING SAV 02 -Jul -18 $ 2,021,187.50 OPERATING CD 03 -Jul -18 01 -Mar -18 $ 22,728.90 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 03 -Jul -18 $ 40.56 OPERATING SAV 03 -Jul -18 $ 13,750.00 OPERATING COMM PAPER 05 -Jul -18 02 -Nov -18 $ 2,000,000.00 OPERATING COMM PAPER 13 -Jul -18 11 -Jan -19 $ 2,000,000.00 OPERATING SAV 13 -Jul -18 $ 2,000,000.00 OPERATING CD 20 -Jul -18 21 -Jan -19 $ 2,000,000.00 OPERATING SRV 30 -Jul -18 $ 17,554.66 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 31 -Jul -18 $ 10,467.35 OPERATING SAV 31 -Jul -18 $ 3,000,000.00 OPERATING SAV 31 -Jul -18 $ 1,281.97 OPERATING NOTE 01 -Aug -18 31 -Oct -18 $ 3,000,000.00 OPERATING IPAIT 01 -Aug -18 $ 20,249.41 OPERATING CD 02 -Aug -18 01 -Mar -18 $ 23,521.87 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 14 -Aug -18 $ 10,000,000.00 OPERATING CD 14 -Aug -18 14 -Feb -19 $ 2,000,000.00 OPERATING CD 14 -Aug -18 14 -Aug -19 $ 2,000,000.00 SEWER RESERVES CD 20 -Aug -18 16 -Aug -19 $ 910,000.00 OPERATING IPAIT 20 -Aug -18 $ 786,549.52 OPERATING SAV 20 -Aug -18 $ 17,000.00 OPERATING CD 22 -Aug -18 22 -Aug -19 $ 4,000,000.00 OPERATING CD 22 -Aug -18 22 -Feb -19 $ 4,000,000.00 OPERATING SAV 30 -Aug -18 $ 17,035.90 OPERATING SAV 31 -Aug -18 $ 3,023,219.39 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 31 -Aug -18 $ 23,442.46 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 03 -Sep -18 $ 45.98 OPERATING IPAIT 04 -Sep -18 $ 12,577.69 OPERATING SAV 04 -Sep -18 $ 1,000,000.00 OPERATING COMM PAPER 05 -Sep -18 04 -Mar -19 $ 4,000,000.00 OPERATING CD 05 -Sep -18 01 -Mar -18 $ 24,974.53 OPERATING CD 07 -Sep -18 07 -Mar -19 $ 4,000,000.00 OPERATING IPAIT 07 -Sep -18 $ 2,019,506.85 OPERATING IPAIT 14 -Sep -18 $ 2,020,273.97 OPERATING SAV 14 -Sep -18 $ 17,187.50 OPERATING IPAIT 17 -Sep -18 $ 2,409,868.84 OPERATING SAV 18 -Sep -18 $ 4,000,000.00 OPERATING SRV 18 -Sep -18 $ 30,000.00 OPERATING IPAIT 21 -Sep -18 $ 2,021,108.97 OPERATING CD 21 -Sep -18 21 -Mar -19 $ 2,000,000.00 LANDFILL REPLACEMENT RESERVE NOTE 26 -Sep -18 26 -Mar -21 $ 4,000,000.00 OPERATING SAV 27 -Sep -18 $ 15,523.50 OPERATING SAV 28 -Sep -18 $ 2,994.27 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 28 -Sep -18 $ 28,095.62 OPERATING IPAIT 28 -Sep -18 $ 2,021,218.52 OPERATING IPAIT 28 -Sep -18 $ 2,029,887.68 OPERATING MONEY MRKT 30 -Sep -18 $ 36.53 $ 74,582,328.87 IFA CITY OF IOWA CITY INVESTMENT ACTIVITY FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 FUND INVESTMENT PURCHASE MATURITY INVESTMENT INTEREST INSTITUTION TYPE TYPE DATE DATE AMOUNT RATE REDEMPTIONS 7101/18 TO 9130118 PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK CR BANK & TRUST BANKERS TRUST TWO RIVERS BANK BANKERS TRUST TWO RIVERS BANK BANKERS TRUST BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK CR BANK & TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST BANKERS TRUST CR BANK & TRUST NXT BANK MIDWESTONE BANK CR BANK & TRUST CR BANK & TRUST TWO RIVERS BANK BANKERS TRUST IPAIT CBI BANK & TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK IPAIT MIDWESTONE BANK TWO RIVERS BANK CBI BANK & TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST PIPER JAFFRAY & CO -BANKERS TRUST BANKERS TRUST IPAIT MIDWESTONE BANK IPAIT MIDWESTONE BANK IPAIT BANKERS TRUST MIDWESTONE BANK IPAIT BANKERS TRUST IPAIT IPAIT TOTAL REDEMPTIONS INVESTMENTS ON HAND AT 9130/18 OPERATING NOTE 27 -Oct -17 30 -Jun -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.27 SEWER RESERVES CD 30 -Jun -17 30 -Jun -18 $ (250,000.00) 1.25 SEWER RESERVES CD 30 -Oct -17 01 -Jul -18 $ (1,000,000.00) 1.51 OPERATING SAV 05 -Jul -18 $ (1,985,133.33) 1.81 OPERATING CD 09 -Jan -18 06 -Jul -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.78 OPERATING SAV 10 -Jul -18 $ (3,985.52) 1.81 OPERATING CD 09 -Jan -18 13 -Jul -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.80 OPERATING SAV 16 -Jul -18 $ (1,975,834.44) 1.81 OPERATING SAV 17 -Jul -18 $ (10.70) 1.81 OPERATING CD 17 -Jan -18 20 -Jul -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.78 OPERATING CD 27 -Jul -17 27 -Jul -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.52 OPERATING T BILL 08 -Jan -18 31 -Jul -18 $ (3,000,000.00) 1.55 OPERATING SAV 01 -Rug -18 $ (2,976,154.90) 1.81 OPERATING CD 27 -Jul -17 02 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.52 PARKING RESERVES CD 03 -Feb -17 02 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.24 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND CD 03 -Feb -17 09 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.26 OPERATING CD 31 -Jul -17 09 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.52 OPERATING CD 14 -Aug -17 12 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.47 OPERATING CD 12 -Feb -18 13 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.89 OPERATING SAV 14 -Aug -18 $ (52.43) 1.81 OPERATING IPAIT 14 -Aug -18 $ (10,000,000.00) 1.71 LANDFILL REPLACEMENT RESERVE CD 03 -Feb -17 16 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.38 OPERATING CD 14 -Aug -17 17 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.37 SEWER RESERVES CD 21 -Aug -17 20 -Aug -18 $ (775,000.00) 1.50 OPERATING CD 20 -Feb -18 20 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.92 OPERATING CD 22 -Aug -17 22 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.49 LANDFILL REPLACEMENT RESERVE CD 03 -Feb -17 23 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.38 OPERATING CD 17 -Jan -18 24 -Aug -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.82 OPERATING T BILL 08 -Jan -18 31 -Rug -18 $ (3,000,000.00) 1.62 OPERATING COMM PAPER 04 -Apr -18 04 -Sep -18 $ (1,000,000.00) 2.26 OPERATING SAV 05 -Sep -18 $ (3,953,545.84) 1.81 OPERATING CD 13 -Mar -18 07 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 2.00 OPERATING CD 09 -Mar -18 07 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.91 OPERATING CD 13 -Mar -18 14 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 2.00 OPERATING CD 09 -Mar -18 14 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.93 2016 CHAUNCEY BONDS CD 16 -Sep -16 17 -Sep -18 $ (2,364,542.00) 0.95 OPERATING SAV 18 -Sep -18 $ (10.70) 1.81 OPERATING CD 09 -Mar -18 21 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.94 OPERATING CD 13 -Mar -18 21 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 2.00 OPERATING SAV 26 -Sep -18 $ (4,000,000.00) 1.81 OPERATING IPAIT 29 -Sep -17 28 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 1.50 OPERATING CO 19 -Mar -18 28 -Sep -18 $ (2,000,000.00) 2.00 $ (86,284,269.86) 199,279,616.15 8 Item Number: 11. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Email from Agnieszka Gaertner to Streets/Traffic Engineering Superintendent: Sidewalk ATTACHMENTS: Description Email from A. Gaertner to Streets & Traffic Supt. Kellie Fruehling From: Gaertner, Agnieszka M <agnieszka-gaertner@uiowa.edu> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2018 10:38 PM r To: Brock Holub Cc: Council Subject: Sidewalk Dear Mr. Holub, I'm writing to you in regard to the condition of a path walk that needs immediate intervention. I'm one of the tenants in the new building at 627 Orchard Ct. There are many other students living in this building as well as in the other apartment building right next to it. Many of us, to get to school or work, have to walk the same way that goes below a railway bridge. As you'll see in the attached map, the route goes along S Riverside Dr to get to Myrtle Av. There is no other way to get there besides the narrow and slippery path walk below the bridge. Exactly that part below the bridge is particularly dangerous. Although there is a crossing at S Riverside Dr and W Benton St and one could take this longer way and try to cross the road back at Myrtle Av, but even this option is impossible because there is no other crosswalk anywhere nearby Myrtle Av. As you see, the only way to get to Myrtle Av is by the path walk on the left side on S Riverside Dr. Unfortunately, that path walk is currently in a highly dangerous condition. There are many irregular stones on the ground which make it very easy for one to slip and fall under a passing car. In addition, the trees are growing far into the path walk and the street making it impossible to pass without having to push them away every time you walk there and limiting the view. During rain, the ground becomes muddy and very slippery. Furthermore, the path is very narrow and we are forced to walk right next to cars passing by with high speed. In these circumstances it is extremely dangerous to walk to school and it is only the matter of time when an accident will happen. It is the responsibility of the city to maintain roads and path walks safe, especially for pedestrians. Now, having knowledge of this problem, you'll be particularly responsible if anything bad happens. It is very upsetting that currently there are construction works on Myrtle Av to improve the condition of the road but no one takes care of that walking path. Employees from that construction side watch us struggle everyday and no one does anything about it. I'm kindly asking you to intervene and perform appropriate repair work. If this matter is not within your responsibilities, please forward this e-mail to someone who is able to help. Please find attached a link showing the path that goes below the railway bridge. The path walk I'm talking about is exactly below the bridge on S Riverside Dr. https://goo.gl/maps/gmCxkgi5ETo Also, please see the pictures attached showing the conditions of the path walk. Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Agnieszka Gaertner .wr � 41 f - r ma „ rme, � � •.. � ,ter' � � + R- rr r . a , s .! r • r n 'I p t _ , •..a _>..a ars K , ,. .r 'All y .r w a - �ry i n id41 z• ,.. ", �.. N MAY" +iY' •�' �a rp, F i y T A r ' A , 7�' � �`y�p�g"-�-,. ��Y •ids � "�r, '� �� '$fir A' t+M1,.. �,*A�Wrr •.°�h S ` � � V� � #•.��r. ,� .�t M� `; v Y ` � .. � d , ems• ya • 'may} '• �y$ fYf • r r n t.. Item Number: 12. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Civil Service Entrance Examination: Maintenance Worker II - Transportation Services ATTACHMENTS: Description Uvil 6ervice: Maintenance Worker I I - Transportation Services CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org October 18, 2018 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination — Maintenance Worker II — Transportation Services Under the authority of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, I do hereby certify the following named person(s) as eligible for the position of Maintenance Worker II Transportation Services. Brenner Gibson IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Rick Wyss, Chair ,� .� mrvarmwY. Item Number: 13. + r , • yyrrmr�� CITY 0E 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Civil Service Entrance Examination: Mass Transit Operator ATTACHMENTS: Description Civil Service Mass Transit Operator I r -4 iq;K-P CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org October 19, 2018 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - Mass Transit Operator Under the authority of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, I do hereby certify the following named person(s) as eligible for the position of Mass Transit Operator. David Arch r113 Richard Jacobson Michael Simon Megan Vance y - y N) IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISf,ON Rick Wyss, Chair Item Number: 14. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Invitation: Johnson County Affordable Housing Coalition Community Meeting - October 26 ATTACHMENTS: Description Jo. County Aftordable Housing Coalition Oct. 26 Kellie Fruehling From: Johnson County Affordable Housing Coalition <jcaffordablehousing@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 12:05 PM To: Council Subject: Is Housing in Iowa City "Fair"? I October Community Meeting this Friday News and Updates from the Johnson County Affordable Is this email not displaying correctly? Housing Coalition! View it in your browser. THIS FRIDAY AT NOON! We're looking forward to hearing from you at this month's community meeting. Friday, October 26 Noon -1:00 pm Johnson County Health and Human Services Room 203C (855 S. Dubuque St., Iowa City) Our presenter will be Kirk Lehmann with the City of Iowa City. He'll be discussing the City's efforts to expand housing opportunities for Iowa City resident. As part of the City's Fair Housing Survey, Kirk wants to hear from YOU about possible barriers to fair housing for all. Come to learn more and to share your ideas and experiences. See you at noon on Friday! 1 --Sara Barron, Executive Director P.S. Have you submitted YOUR 2018-2019 membership for JCAHC yet? There's still time. Click here to sign up and pay your annual dues online! Copyright © 2018 Johnson County Affordable Housing Coalition, All rights reserved. Imailehimp You are receiving this email because you signed up at an event or meeting. Our mailing address is: Johnson County Affordable Housing Coalition 308 E. Burlington St. PMB 121 Iowa City, IA 52240 Add us to your address book unsubscribe from this list I update subscription preferences I view email in browser Item Number: 15. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Invitation: Talk on Public Banking - October 26 ATTACHMENTS: Description Invitation Public Banking October 26 Kellie Fruehling From: dawn jones <dawnj@netins.net> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 3:12 PM To: Council Subject: Talk on Public Banking Friday October 26, 2:00 p.m. at the Senior Center Attachments: PublicBankPaul_B.pdf Hi City Councilors, Public banking could allow the city to spend half of what it currently does on infrastructure projects. Hope you are able to attend Robin Kash's presentation Dawn Jones Wellman Iowa 319 646-6712 W40111 Street W ()III* Streets! Imagine a bank that serves the community with a Mt priority on people mid the environment. The public is invited. Everyone is welcome. Item Number: 16. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Airport Commission: September 26 ATTACHMENTS: Description Airport Commission: September 26 September 26, 2018 Page 1 MINUTES IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 — 4:00 P.M. AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING Members Present: Minnetta Gardinier, Derek LaBrie, Christopher Lawrence Members Absent: Robert Libby Staff Present: Eric Goers, Michael Tharp Others Present: Matt Wolford AAM RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council action): None. DETERMINE QUORUM: The meeting was called to order at 4:45 P.M. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes from the August 16, 2018, meeting were reviewed first. LaBrie moved to accept the minutes of the August 16, 2018, meeting, as presented. Gardinier seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0, Libby absent. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: None. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION: a. FAA/IDOT Projects: AECOM I David Hughes i. Obstruction Mitigation — Tharp stated that they just received the project initiation letter from the FAA. There is a conference call scheduled for next week to confirm the projects that will be part of this next phase — the runway 2-5 threshold work, as well as the mitigation work. Wolford asked if they are expecting to do any of this work this year, and Tharp responded by stating that not much actual work will take place this year. The parts in play are the relocation and the marking of the 2-5 threshold, and then some phase of the obstruction mitigation. ii. North T -Hangar Restroom — Tharp stated that the restroom is done and usable now. There were a few punchlist items that the contractor was finishing up. Gardinier stated that the restroom is indeed up and running, although there were no paper towels. She also spoke to the room next to the new restroom, and Tharp stated that it is for utility access basically. September 26, 2018 Page 2 The circuit breaker panel is still in there. Gardinier noted that the door to this room was unlocked recently. iii. Terminal Apron Rehab 1. Consider a resolution authorizing Chair to accept an Iowa DOT grant — Tharp stated that the grant offer came through from the DOT. Along with it were a bunch of new forms to be signed and returned, which he noted are in the meeting packet. Goers responded to Member questions regarding this. Lawrence moved to authorize Resolution #A18-07, authorizing the Chair to accept the Iowa DOT grant for the terminal rehab project, LaBrie seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0, Libby absent. A vote was then taken for an Acting Secretary, due to Libby's absence. Lawrence moved to nominate LaBrie as Acting Secretary. Gardinier seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0, Libby absent. Gardinier stated that she is still not sure how they got this money, that she thought the Iowa state grant they requested had been denied. Tharp stated that they actually put in for two projects — one to replace the fuel kiosk, and the other for the apron project. b. FBO / Flight Training Reports I. Jet Air — Wolford began with the monthly maintenance reports. He noted that August was basically lots of mowing and they were also able to get some grass seed down. The big purchase for the month was a new chainsaw. He added that the Parks department did come help with the cleanup of the downed trees in front of the Airport. For September, Wolford stated that they had to replace the exit lights as they were not bright enough, according to the Fire Marshall. Tharp also spoke to this, noting some of the locations around the Airport that have already been taken care of. Wolford stated that the Streets department came out and helped with some issues as well. Continuing, Wolford spoke to Jet Air. He stated that they had another successful game day recently, with lots of air traffic. He noted that they have found ways around the wet grounds lately when it comes to parking the airplanes. The charter business is continuing to do well, according to Wolford, as is the shop. C. Airport Operations i. Management 1. Airport Viewing Area — Tharp stated that the issues with the contractor have now been resolved and they should be finishing things up soon. ii. Budget — Tharp stated that one of the things that has come from the cancellation of the Gilbert Street lease is the Airport now has to maintain this property. He noted that with the purchase of a trailer they will be able to tow the zero -turn back and forth. This trailer will run about $2,500, according to Tharp. He added that there is money left over from the furniture replacement that will cover this purchase. Budget season for the City kicks off this week, according to Tharp, which may result in the need for a special meeting of the Commission. September 26, 2018 Page 3 iii. Events — Tharp stated that he doesn't have anything scheduled at this time. Wolford then spoke to an October 10th event, from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M., at the Airport. d. Commission Members' Reports — None. e. Staff Report — Tharp stated that this Friday he may be out of the office late afternoon. Also, towards the end of October, he will be in Chicago again. f. Consider a motion to go into Executive Session, to discuss strategy with counsel in matters that presently are in litigation, or where litigation is imminent, where it's disclosure would be likely to prejudice or disadvantage the position of the governmental body in that litigation — Lawrence moved to adjourn to Executive Session at 5:06 P.M., seconded by Lawrence. Motion carried 3-0, Libby absent. Lawrence moved to adjourn the Executive Session at 5:25 P.M., seconded by Gardinier. Motion carried 3-0, Libby absent. SET NEXT REGULAR MEETING FOR: The next regular meeting of the Airport Commission will be held on Thursday, October 18, 2018, at 6:00 P.M. in the Airport Terminal Building. ADJOURN: Lawrence moved to adjourn the meeting at 5:26 P.M. LaBrie seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0, Libby absent. CHAIRPERSON DATE September 26, 2018 Page 4 Airport Commission ATTENDANCE RECORD 2018 Key: X = Present X/E = Present for Part of Meeting O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = Not a Member at this time TERM o i 0 j 0 N 0 N 0 W 0 A 0 �T 0 Ql 0 V 0 co 0 to NAME EXP. co w Cn W o as CD co 00 00 Go 00 00 cc co co co 00 M i n netta 07/01/19 0 Gardinier X X X X X X X /E X X X Robert 07/01/20 O/ 0/ Libby O/E X X X X E X X X X E Christopher 07/01/21 Lawrence X X X X X X X X X X X Derek 07/01/22 N N N N LaBrie NM M NM NM M M NM M X X X Key: X = Present X/E = Present for Part of Meeting O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = Not a Member at this time Item Number: 17. + r ui �1 lat • yyrrmr�� CITY Ok 10WA CITY www.icgov.org October 25, 2018 Public Art Advisory Committee: October 4 ATTACHMENTS: Description Public Art Advisory Committee: October 4 Preliminary MINUTES PUBLIC ART ADVISORY COMMITTEE OCTOBER 4, 2018 — 3:30 PM LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM — CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Erin Fitzgerald, Vero Rose Smith, Wendy Brown, Steve Miller, Ron Knoche, Juli Seydell Johnson NOT PRESENT: Tam Bodkin Bryk STAFF PRESENT: Marcia Bollinger, Morgan Musselman PUBLIC PRESENT: Meeting was called to order by Steve Miller, as Erin Fitzgerald would be arriving late _PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: Fitzgerald arrived at 3:40 p.m. Vero Rose Smith, who is a member of the feminist art collective "Blue Stockings," brought to the committee comments made by fellow Blue Stocking members concerning the de -installation of the benches in Pedestrian Mall. Rose Smith mentioned that a number of Blue Stocking members painted benches for the BenchMarks project this past year and are upset with how these benches have been handled following de -installation. Rose Smith mentioned that the contractual language for the BenchMarks project did mention that the benches were guaranteed to be on display for one year and there was no guarantee as to what would happen to the benches after this one year was up. Rose Smith stated that the Blue Stockings members request better communication in the future. Rose Smith stated that one of the Blue Stockings members who was a BenchMarks artist found her bench for sale on a government auction website, without credit given to her as the artist or notification that the benches were going to be for sale. Rose Smith stated that some artists have been solicited by Thomas Agran to give ideas about what they would have liked to see happen with the benches once they were de -installed from the Ped Mall and that those ideas range from 25% of the sale of the bench going back to the artist to other ideas such as donating proceeds to a charitable cause of the artists' choice, but at the very least the artists wanted notification of when the de -installation would occur, which did not happen. Rose Smith also mentioned that Thomas Agran informed her that the benches are being sold as benches, rather than as art, but that she still believes the artists' names should be included if the benches are to be sold in a painted state. Fitzgerald asked about the process of selling painted Herky statues, because she recalls being notified of the sale of those she painted. Marcia Bollinger stated that was because they were part of an auction, whereas the benches were being sold as a commodity. Bollinger stated that she has been contacted by the staff member who is responsible for the installation and transition of the benches on the Ped Mall, who informed her that the de -installation was going to happen. Bollinger mentioned that she also received a phone call from one of the bench artists roughly six months ago because the artist had heard that the benches were going to be removed and that the artist was interested in purchasing the bench she had painted. Bollinger stated that she informed the artist that the benches would be sold as commodities. Miller asked if all of the benches are being sold. Bollinger replied that there are a few that have been reserved and will be relocated. Bollinger asked Ron Knoche and Juli Seydell Johnson if they could confirm that this is true. Seydell Johnson replied that she does not know. Knoche replied that the plan is to change the style of bench installed on the Ped Mall, and that he does not know for certain if there are some benches being preserved. Bollinger stated that not all of the benches are currently posted on the government auction website because they are selling them in phases and that the time frame for bidding on them is also staggered. Fitzgerald asked who is orchestrating the process of removing the benches and putting them on the site. Seydell Johnson stated that it is a process the City follows for the disposal of any City asset. Rose Smith stated that she believes the artists are mainly looking for recognition on these sites if this were to happen in the future and potentially an apology for the lack of communication. Bollinger stated that she will mention it to the staff. Knoche asked if, in the past, the City notified artists when their work was being painted over during the next phase of annual bench painting. Bollinger responded that she does not know because the Downtown District orchestrates that project. Rose Smith stated that she has considered the possibility that in the contractual language with the Downtown District, which she has not seen, this was addressed. Bollinger stated that there is a possibility that this specific situation of the de -installation and sale of the benches was not addressed in the contract because it is likely a standard agreement. Rose Smith asked if she should address the Downtown District about this instead, rather than the Committee. Bollinger replied that would probably be the best channel to go through, as the Downtown District has orchestrated this project for years. Fitzgerald asked if the BenchMarks project was over, or if it would be continuing with the new benches that will be placed in the Ped Mall. Bollinger stated that she believes the BenchMarks project is over and that the mural project is considered its replacement to some degree. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 6. 2018 MEETING Marcia Bollinger stated that she had received the full names of the students who attended the September 6th meeting with Rachel Arnone to present their proposals for the Longfellow Pedestrian Tunnel. Both students' names will be edited in the minutes. Wendy Brown moved to approve the minutes with the changes to the students' names. Rose Smith seconded. Motion passed unanimously. REVIEW OF SUBMISSIONS TO RFQ FOR CITY HALL ART PROJECT Before consideration of the RFQ responses for the City Hall Art Project, Seydell Johnson asked to present to the committee the replacement for the "Mayors Wall" in the City Council chambers, an installation which involves a number of octagonal pieces displaying Iowa City's mayors. Sydell Johnson stated that she expects this piece to be installed in around eight to ten weeks. Seydell Johnson stated that she wanted to show this to the Committee now because one of the proposals for the City Hall Art Project, which will be installed on the opposite side of the Mayors Wall installation, involves a similar design. Fitzgerald noted to the Committee that one of the submissions is that of the finalists from last year's application round, Tim Adams. Fitzgerald asked Bollinger if this artist saw the request for qualifications or if she informed him directly. Bollinger replied that she informed both Adams and Vako Darjania directly. She said Darjania and she had corresponded briefly via email and that he had voiced his interest, but that he had not submitted to the RFQ. Miller clarified that the submissions are for a request for qualifications, not proposals. Bollinger confirmed that was the case. Brown expressed surprise that there were much fewer submissions than last year. Miller asked how many responses the Committee received last year. Bollinger responded that they received thirteen submissions last year, and that she thinks the high number could be due in part to last year's request being published on websites that advertises artist opportunities. Fitzgerald asked if the Committee would be selecting three artists, as they did last year. Bollinger responded that the decision to do so is up to the Committee; they do not need to select three artists. Brown asked what potential consequences to extending the deadline there would be. Bollinger responded that if the Committee were to extend the deadline, it would be more difficult to complete the project within the fiscal year. Rose Smith stated that, given the Committee's prior experience, professionalism is something that she finds very important to focus on during this round of submissions, and that to her, the artist who stands out as having the professional experience that the Committee desires is Tim Adams. Rose Smith stated that her second choice is Rachel Ayers-Arnone, but that Arnone's focus as presented in the samples of previous work provided in her submission to the RFQ is not quite what the Committee is looking for in the City Hall piece. Fitzgerald stated that she agrees with Rose Smith's comments. Fitzgerald stated that she trusts Tim Adams because she has seen his work for years and knows that it is quality work that is long-lasting and displays attention to detail. Fitzgerald stated that the Committee should ask Adams to propose a piece that is different from his last proposal because the previous proposal was not as connected to the community as the Committee would have liked. Miller stated that he enjoys Adams' "Freebird" installation in Cedar Rapids. Fitzgerald stated that she believes Adams is an artist who the Committee could collaborate with well and someone who is open to suggestions by the Committee. Rose Smith stated that Adams has a record of working with materials that are lasting and of creating and executing public -scale works that will stand the test of time. Bollinger stated that Adams asked her for feedback on what the Committee did not like about his proposal from the first round and was very open to hearing and appreciative of the Committee's comments. Seydell-Johnson asked the Committee if they would like something closer to the "Freebird" piece instead of something with a lot of detail. Seydell-Johnson suggested the Committee ask Adams about constructing a piece similar in style to "Freebird". Bollinger stated that she believes Adams would be open to sitting down the Committee and discussing what the Committee's vision is for the City Hall project. Fitzgerald stated that she found the material selection for his previous proposal to be an excellent fit for the space. Bollinger stated that it also lent itself well to lighting. Rose Smith stated that the indoor location of the piece would mean it would be easy to maintain because it is not exposed to the elements. Miller stated that he was apprehensive about Terrance Riley's lack of experience. Rose Smith stated that she is familiar with the Ellis Island Inside -Out project that Riley mentions in his letter, but that such a project would require a lot of involvement from the Committee and that she is apprehensive about his lack of detail concerning materials that are involved in the Ellis Island project and the materials that he would use in his own project. Rose Smith stated that Riley does not seem to have the professional experience the Committee wants for this particular project. Rose Smith stated that Marina Ross's mural downtown is beautiful, but that she believes the Committee is not looking for a painting for the City Hall space. Bollinger stated that she did not see much reflection of the community in the proposal Ross discussed in her submission. Rose Smith noted that these submissions were for an RFQ, not complete proposals for the project, which is something that needs to be considered. Rose Smith stated that Ross's only experience at this scale is mural work, so she believes it's likely that a mural is what Ross would propose, in which case the question of materiality comes into play. Fitzgerald stated that she would not like a mural to be featured in that space. Fitzgerald stated that she believes she made the wrong choice in her selection of artist during last year's proposals and that she believes Adams was and is the best choice for this project and that she would like the Committee to choose to work with him. Miller stated that he agrees. Seydell Johnson also stated that she agrees. Seydell Johnson stated that she thinks the Committee should pay Adams an honorarium to come to the committee so they can discuss their ideas for the piece, then final approval would come after the agreement on the design. Seydell Johnson motioned to provide Tim Adams with a $250 honorarium to come to the Committee with further design developments for the City Hall Lobby art project, tailored more towards his "Freebirds" design. Brown asked if the Committee wanted to discuss things with Adams in a meeting before he came to them with further design developments, so that he does not begin a design before hearing the Committee's ideas. Bollinger stated that she thinks doing so is a good idea and would allow the project to advance at a quicker pace. Bollinger stated that she didn't want to put him in a position where he presents a design to the Committee and the Committee doesn't like it. Fitzgerald stated that there seems to be a sense that many people who work at City Hall care about how the piece will look in the lobby, and want it to fit well within the space and to involve certain materials that will elevate the space, so hearing those ideas and visions would likely help Adams create a piece for that space. Seydell Johnson amended the motion to offer Tim Adams a $250 honorarium, invite him to the Committee's next meeting in November or whenever is convenient for him to come to discuss ideas, and then come back to the Committee with a design proposal based on those ideas. Rose Smith seconded. Motion passed unanimously. COMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENTS OR REPORTS: Fitzgerald announced that this is her last meeting as a member of the Committee, as she is moving to a different town and is no longer eligible for the position. Bollinger presented Fitzgerald with a certificate of recognition to acknowledge her service. Fitzgerald stated that she has loved being a member of the Committee and will continue to support the Iowa City art community.. Rose Smith stated that, in conjunction with four architecture firms downtown, the University of Iowa Art Museum is working on a pop-up exhibition that will take place in the pods on the Ped Mall Rose Smith stated that there will be a party beforehand downtown, where each firm will present their vision of home in response to an exhibition that she has organized through the museum which is on display at the Figge Art Museum. The pods will open officially on November 2, and the Figge exhibit is already open. Miller asked if the design Seydell Johnson shared for the location of the Snelson sculpture is the same as what she showed the Committee in the September meeting. Seydell Johnson responded that there have not been any changes made to the plan but that she is trying to get more information on that project. Seydell Johnson stated that she is also trying to get more information on the Farmers' Market project, as she has sent the contract to the artist who will be creating the project and has not yet heard back from the artist. Seydell Johnson stated that Cara Briggs Farmer is moving forward with the Chadek Green garden sculpture and that Briggs Farmer has been informed that the Committee would like to continue working with her on future community garden placemaking projects. Bollinger asked when the Chadek Green sculpture will be installed. Seydell Johnson responded that it should be either this fall or early next spring, but that Backyard Abundance is altering the design of the gardens slightly, which is holding off installation currently. Bollinger stated that Creekside Park has been demolished to prepare for the installation of a new playground. Fitzgerald asked if the change to the zoning code that was approved by the Committee during the September meeting had been approved by the Council yet. Bollinger stated that it is on the Council's agenda for its next meeting. STAFF REPORTS: Bollinger stated that the Longfellow Tunnel mural was painted early today by Rachel Arnone's art students from Southeast Junior High School. Bollinger shared photos of the mural with the Committee. Fitzgerald asked if there was a plaque or something similar noting who painted the mural. Bollinger stated that Rachel Arnone and the students typically write that the mural was completed by the students of Southeast Junior High somewhere near the mural, but that she wasn't sure if they had done that this year. ADJOURNMENT: Knoche moved to adjourn. Miller seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned 4:25 pm. Public Art Advisory Committee Attendance Record 2018 Term 1/4 2/1 4/5 5/3 6/7 7/12 8/2 9/6 10/4 Name Expires Bodkin Bryk, O/E x x x x x x O/E O/E Tam 01/01/19 Brown, Wendy 01/01/20 x x x x x x x x x Erin Fitzgerald 01/01/20 x x x x x x x x x Knoche, Ron x x x x x x x x x Seydell- Johnson, Jul! x x x x x x x x x Vero Rose Smith 01/01/21 x O/E x x O/E x O/E x x Steve Miller 02/01/21 -- x x x O/E x x x x Key: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a member