HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-14-2019 Historic Preservation CommissionIOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, February 14, 2019
City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street
Emma Harvat Hall
5:30 p.m.
A) Call to Order
B) Roll Call
C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
D) Certificate of Appropriateness
1. 1117 Seymour Avenue — Longfellow Historic District (garage demolition and reconstruction
and house addition)
E) Review draft CLG Annual Report
F) Discussion of Historic Preservation Plan Priorities and annual work program
G) Consideration of Minutes for January 10, 2019
H) Commission Information and Discussion
1. Iowa City Downtown update
2. Sanxay-Gilmore House update
3. Houses at 225 N. Gilbert Street and 229 N. Gilbert Street
4. Preserve Iowa Summit Theme: Reinvention through Rehabilitation, Newton IA, June 6-8
I) Adjournment
If you will need disabilityrelatedaccommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact Jessica
Bristow, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5243 or at Jessica -bristow@a Iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly
encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs.
Staff Ret)ort February 7, 2019
Historic Review for 1117 Seymour Avenue
District Longfellow Historic District
Classification: Contributing
The applicants, Rose Schabilion and Eric Strand, are requesting approval for a proposed demolition, addition
and new construction project at 1117 Seymour Avenue, a Contributing property in the Longfellow Historic
District. The project consists of the demolition of the existing garage and screened porch and the
construction of a new rear addition and new garage at the rear of the property.
AB 'cable Regulations
and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa
CityAistorlcPtesemation Guidelines for Altemdons
4.3
Doors
4.5
Foundations
4.6
Gutters and Downspouts
4.7
Mass and Rooflines
4.10
Porches
4.11
Siding
4.13
Windows
4.14
Wood
9.0 Guidelines for Additions
5.1 Expansion of Building Footprint
6.0 Guidelines for New Construction
6.2 New Outbuildings
T.0 Guidelines for Demolition
7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures or Significant Features
Staff Comments
His
This house, built c. 1940 is representative of a common style of inftll found in the Longfellow neighborhood,
the Minimal Traditional house. Typical hallmarks of this style found here are the side -facing main gable with
the front facing smaller gabled wing, the six -over -one double hung windows, the lack of an overhang at the
roofline and minimal architectural detail. This house, at least with the front door trim, exhibits Colonial
Revival detailing which was one of the more common elaborations when a builder went beyond the typical
"simplicity" of the style. Often, Minimal Traditional homes were built using FHA -insured loans in the midst
of the Depression. The screened porch addition dates from 1996. The garage appears to be original to the
house.
This house presents an interesting case in regard to its original siding. The Sanborn Fire Insurance maps
indicate that the house had asbestos siding at the time of the 1933-1948 map. Given the fact that the house
was built during this time and asbestos siding was reaching the high -point of its popularity, it is likely the
original siding on the house instead of a replacement siding as found on many older Iowa City properties. At
the time of the 1973 property assessment, the house was indicated to have asbestos shingle siding. While
asbestos siding was available in the 1940s in a plank form, shingle was the most popular style during the time.
Currently, the house has vinyl siding over some form of existing siding and a layer of insulation. The material
and condition of the existing siding is not known but is assumed to be asbestos instead of an interim
replacement siding. It is also unknown whether or not the house has any other elements of Colonial Revival
details hidden by the vinyl siding.
Proposal
The applicant is proposing to remove the existing single -car garage and replace it with a new two -car garage
located at the rear of the property and accessed through the alley. With the exception of the size and location,
the new garage will replicate the old with Dutch lap siding, small windows, and two single -car, flat -panel
garage doors.
In addition, the applicant also proposes to remove the screened porch addition and construct a new addition
at the back of the house. The new addition will step in 9 inches from the comer of the house on the east side.
On the west side it will step in more significantly to create an obvious distinction between the existing and
new portions of the house because of the visibility of this side of the house from both street and alley. The
addition will step back out on the west side to accommodate interior uses. A portion of this step in will be
covered in a low -slope roof, creating a porch area and covered entry.
The new addition will match the key horizontal lines of the existing house, such as cave, door head and
window head heights. The roof shingles will match the light gray asphalt shingles on the rest of the house.
The existing house has a rock -faced concrete block foundation. The new foundation will be pouted concrete
or precast insulated concrete walls but will be faced, above grade, with a split -faced block veneer. Because of
a new basement, the addition will include an egress window which will be a casement window with muntin
bars to match the double -hung windows in the rest of the house. While the existing house has corrugated
metal window wells on the east side, the new window well will match the foundation.
Part of the proposed project will include work on the existing house. Because of the reconfiguration of
interior spaces, the existing west -facing kitchen door will be removed and the wall will be infilled at that
location. The applicant proposes to replace the existing windows, which are deteriorated, with new metal clad
wood windows that match the existing windows. These new windows would also be used in the addition. The
applicant proposes to replace the front concrete stoop. Finally, the applicant proposes to remove the existing
vinyl siding. At this point, the existing siding would be assessed and replaced if necessary with a cement -board
style similar to the original shingle -style asbestos.
Guidelines
The guidelines recommend retaining historic garages and if the garage is insufficient for modern vehicles,
efforts should be made to construct a new garage on another portion of the site. Where it is not possible to
save an existing garage, the guidelines recommend designing replacement garages to be compatible in design
with the primary structure and/or other outbuildings in the neighborhood. New outbuildings should be
constructed to the rear of the property and subordinate in size and ornamentation to the primary structure,
but should reflect the style of the primary structure. Windows should be relatively small and rectangular.
The guidelines recommend that new additions preserve historic materials and do not diminish the character
of the historic structure. The new addition should be distinguished from the existing building by offsetting
the walls of the addition from the walls of the original structure. Key horizontal lines should be matched and
the palette of materials should be similar to the historic structure. Siding, windows, trim, foundation, and roof
should all match the existing. The guidelines also tecommend preserving significant historic materials and
features of the original structure such as decorative windows and trim. Building additions should be placed at
the rear of a property.
Analysis
This project includes multiple elements that have been reviewed according to the guidelines. While the goal
of the guidelines would be to retain the existing garage and construct an additional garage on the property,
this garage is in a heavily deteriorated condition. Neither of the two walls that are available to asses, east and
south, are plumb or straight. Both bow out vertically and horizontally. The siding has dried out so that it has
split and the windows are heavily deteriorated. The garage shows evidence of recent structural issues in the
form of attempts to brace the walls in several places. The slab has also cracked and sunk in one corner and in
most areas, the sill plate has rotted through. Initial discussions included the possibility of relocating the garage
to allow the construction of the addition with a functional yard but staff recommends demolition instead,
feeling that the garage may be too deteriorated to move and rehabilitate.
In Staffs opinion, the proposed addition is an acceptable way to increase the interior space on this small
house. While the addition is large, it is still subordinate to the existing house, being both shorter and narrower
than the existing house. The addition is located on the back, set in from both aides, and the roof ridge line is
lower than that on the existing house. Key horizontal lines will be matched, and trim, siding, shingles and
windows will all match the existing house. Staff recommends approval of the addition with product
information to be approved by staff prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness.
For the windows on the existing house, staff also recommends approval of their replacement The existing
windows consist of a typical double hung window with replacement storms that are ill-fitting and non-
functional. The sashes include a varying degree of deterioration from broken glass and ropes which could be
repaired to rotten corners and missing elements. The window frames present an additional layer of
deterioration which leads staff to recommend their replacement As part of the vinyl siding installation, all
sills and trim were covered in aluminum. The sills in particular sound hollow under the aluminum and when
one of the aluminum covers were removed, the sill was found to be unsalvageable. The jambs, which unlike
the sills, remain un-clad on the interior, still sound curiously hollow. It is suspected that the aluminum
cladding on the trim has trapped moisture in the window frame causing deterioration which is visible on the
interior in about half of the windows. Given the extent of the deterioration, staff recommends replacement
For the siding, once the vinyl and underlying insulation is removed, it will be assessed. If it is the original
asbestos and is in good enough condition that the owner wants to retain it, they may. The new addition
would match it in a cement board that is similar. If it is a lap siding or some other appropriate replacement
that is in good condition, staff recommends approving that as well. Again, the addition would match that. If
the original siding is missing or in bad condition, or is asbestos that the owner wants to remove, staff
recommends replacement with a shingle siding that retains the character of the original asbestos. Cement -
board could be acceptable for this replacement
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 1117 Seymour as presented in the
application and staff report with the following conditions:
■ All door and window products approved by staff.
■ :Existing siding and trim assessed and removal/replacement approved by staff.
!�1{ < y�fr - as - �� ,�`p•' •.Cv .04
_ a
p �li fYN�4b'� C
APPLICATION FOR HISTORIC REVIEW
Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or
properties located in a historic district or conservation district
pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 144C. Guidelines for
the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and
regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic
Preservation Handbook, which is available in the
Neighborhood and Development Services office at City Hall
or online at: www.icpov—.org/histQZio=ervationresol,rces
The HPC doe t
s no review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must
comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. Applications are due in the
office of Neighborhood and Development Services by noon on Wednesday three weeks prior to the
meeting. See last page of this application for deadlines and meeting dates.
PROPERTY OWNER' APPLICANT INFORMATION
{Please check primary contact person)
❑ Property Owner Name: Rose Schabilion and Eric Strand
Email: rose schabilion ahoo.com Phone Number: 319-930
Address: 11 117 Seymour Ave
City: Iowa Ciy State: ® Zip Code: 52240
[� Contractor/ Consultant Name: Michael Nolan AIA Horizon Architecture
Email: michael(�horizon-architecture con .Phone Number: 563-snF�4Fc
City: Iowa Ci State: l=J Zip Code: 52245
PROPOSED PROJECT_ INFORMATION
Address: 1117 Se our Ave
Use of Property: Residence Date Constructed (if known): h 940
HISMRic DmeNATION
(Maps are located at the following link: � iceov or& / hisjQnrnMa�m. aces
❑ This Property is a local historic landmark.
OR
® This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location):
❑ Brown St. Historic District ❑ Northside Historic District ❑ College Hill Conservation District
❑ College Green Historic District ❑ Summit St. Historic District ❑ Dearborn St. Conservation District
❑ East College St. Historic District ❑ Woodlawn Historic District ❑ Goosetown/ Horace Mann
❑ Jefferson St. Historic District ❑ Clark St. Conservation Conservation District
® Longfellow Historic District District ❑ Governor -Lucas St. Conservation
Within the district, this Property is Classified as: District
m Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ❑ Nonhistoric
APF'idCAnoN REQUtREMENiB
Choose appropriate project type. In order to ensure application can be processed, please include all
listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected.
® Addition {Typically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, etc.)
® Building Elevations ® Floor Plans ® Photographs
❑ Product Information m Site Plans
❑ Alteration (Typically projects entailing work such as siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening
alterations, deck or porch replacement/construction, baluster repair, or similar. If the project is a minor
alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project are sufficient.)
❑ Building Elevations ❑ Product Information ❑ Photographs
❑ Construction of a new building
❑ Building Elevations ❑ Floor Plana ❑ Photographs
❑ Product Information ❑ Site Plans
® Demolition (Projects entailing the demolition of a primary structure or outbuilding, or any portion of a building, such
as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.)
® Photographs ®Evidence of deterioration ® Proposal of Future Plans
Repair or Restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance.
❑ Photographs ❑ Product Information
•
Please contact the Preservation Specialist at 356-5243 for materials which need to be included with applications
APPL.JCATION REQUIREMENTS
Project Description:
;e see attached plans. Demolish and remove screen porch addition and deteriorated outbuilding. New addition to rear of home
2 bedrooms and bathroom. New detached garage accessed from alley.
Materials to be Used:
To be finalized but anticipate using Pella Pro -Line (or similar) aluminum clad wood windows and James Hardie Fiber Cement
siding. Asphalt shingles to match existing.
Exterior Appearance Changes:
ve vinyl siding and restore wood siding (if practical) or replace with fiber cement siding. Addition behind and narrower than
facade so no apparent changes in massing from street. Remove deteriorated outbuilding and add new detached garage
:ed from alley (siding, windows and shingles to match home).
To Submit Application: Download form, Fill it out and email it to Jessica-bristow®iowa-city.org or mail to Historic
Preservation, City of Iowa City, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240
N
1S FRONT YARDSETBACK
20' REAR YARD SETBACK
-V-------------- --- -r -
I I
I I
I a I
I � I
Y f>
I EED OR SOD NEW OR �
I A�
9 REAR YARD ACCESSORY SETBACK
SCHEMATIC DESIGN - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
9j 1 1* ADDITION AND RENOVATIONS
D 5 4 FOR ROSE SCHABILION AND horizon.
ERIC STRAND original.
I N
SEYNW0.AVE architecture
IMAM
QIY, 7A 52245
SCHEMATIC DESIGN - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION e
ADDITION AND RENOVATIONS
FOR ROSE STRAND
AND
C horizon.
?' T original.
�J I ..x eewna� 11115EVMOUR AE architecture.
2 IOWAC ,IA$2245
E: N SStl Won SknJ Wm StaMtrawM 2018121
I
gi
I
S
i
mm
m P'wt
S
i
B
i
i
6
`$5
N
.0i g
ll a
P
5
Z
Z ;i 2
rpi
n
g r ii i
L,-JIN
i
I
I
SCHEMATIC DESIGN - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
c gg ADDITION AND RENOVATIONS
m`- a FOR ROSE SCNABILION AND , horizon.
0 10 a ERIC STRAND original.
0 p 21175�MWRAVE architecture
Z �m IOWA(]1Y, NSi245
Garage west elevation from alley
Deteriorated siding detail
p
_ � �~max '�►.� - - ti �r .:-r
garage window detail and garage sill plate from interior
� S 1.
southeast corner of garage
k 4
M Oil
ai 11 Oft,
o A
� �F+
window con
seen from it
with exterior
sill conditior
below
�. WIN 00`�'18•OHEDU1.EM
D SIM
WIDTH HEIGHT TYPE NOTES
Ypl
Rip Zd _
�
WW
TP
_
rr
rm
r e
rel
3
ID Ouaitlty W D GLZ HWSET I NOTES
1 1St FLOOR
h� ra
5
5' SIDEYARD SETBACK
Y
U
K
} I d
K
L_
SEYMOUR AVE
r
a
c.'
N
.-
0
C.
s_
o
a
0
za
W
~ Q
>G
z M Z
uj
Z��,
Q W C
00W
M
d/
G
a
a° �
U
U)
z
0
a
tL
a
PROJECT NO:
DATE:
Z
I
DRAWN BY:
COPYRIGHT
Z
0
WSHEET
TITLE
a
PLANS
U
E-
w
U
7A71
REFINISH EXISTING DOORTRIM
REMOVE EXISTING VINYL SIDING AND FANFOLD
INSUPRACTICAL, ASSESS
OTHERVASE INSTALL NM FIBER
CEMENT SHINGLE STYLE SIDING.
STOOP
H
Schabilion Strand traveler:
. .-____-. , I—, clwavlo Q. 14 rivl
MATCH
m UUIc Lnr SIDING
RNUM CLAD WOOD
- STYLE TO MATCH
NEWALUMINUMCLAD
Winn unne..o
z
a
p
U
D
z
0
cc
0
LL
F_
0
z
z
fJ
to
W
0
t,
Q
c
I
to
z°
0z
ma
�0
014°
W m
�a
°vim
aU'�
0 0 W
N �
°0
a�`
ELEVATIONS
A-2
Iowa City
Historic Preservation Commission
City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240
6 _ e __ 1
Date: February 7, 2019
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner
Re: Iowa Certified Local Government 2018 Annual Report Draft
A draft of the annual report, due at the State Histotic Preservation Office on February 28, 2019, is attached
for Commission review. To save paper, the attachments are not included. They would have been included in
Commission agendas during the 2018 meeting calendar. The training table and Commissioner information
forms are also not attached here.
If Commissioners have corrections or information to add to the report, staff requests that the information is
provided at the February 14 Commission meeting or by email to staff by Monday, February 18, 2019 for
inclusion in the report.
[For SHPO use only]
Received
Minimum no. of meetings?
yes no
Required training?
yes no
Fully appointed commission?
yes no
Has the commission been active?
yes no
Has the commission accomplished
at least one project?
yes no
Comments:
Approved/CLG in good standing
yes no
More Information requested
Entered into database J
IOWA CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT
2018 ANNUAL REPORT (January 2018-December 2018)
NAME OF THE CITY, COUNTY, OR LAND USE DISTRICT: Iowa City
Section I.
Locating Historic Properties
Identification, Evaluation, and Registration Activity
CLG Standards found in CLG Agreement and National Historic Preservation Act
♦ The CLG shall maintain a system for the survey and inventory of historic and
prehistoric properties in a manner consistent with and approved by the STATE.
♦ The CLG will review National Register nominations on any property that lies in the
jurisdiction of the local historic preservation commission.
1. Please provide complete reports and site inventory forms from historic
identification/survey, evaluation, and/or registration/nomination projects that your
commission completed in 2018. Do not include projects that were funded with a CLG
grant or mandated by the Section 106 review and compliance process as we already
have these in our files.
(All Iowa City project forms already submitted to SHPO and not attached here)
• National Register Nomination for 10. S. Gilbert Street, Unitarian Universalist
Church (confirmed National Register listing October 2018. Local landmark
designation in 2017)
CLG Annual Report 2018
• National Register Nomination for 416 Reno Street, Albert J. and Alice E. Borts
House (reviewed Nomination in December, National Register Listing anticipated
in 2019)
• National Register Nomination for 942 Iowa Avenue, Iowa Federation Home
(reviewed Nomination in September, National Register Listing anticipated in
2019)
• National Register Nomination for 914 S. Dubuque Street, Tate Arms (reviewed
Nomination in September, National Register Listing anticipated in 2019)
• Survey and Evaluation Update: Iowa City Central Business District (an update of
a 2001 Survey originally complied in an MPD format as an amendment to the
1994, Historic Resources of Iowa City, IA. Reviewed by the Commission and
anticipated to result in a National Register Nomination for a Historic District in
2019)
2. How many National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties in your City,
County, or LUD were altered, moved, or demolished in 2018? Please identify the
property (historic name and address) and the action.
See list below. 34 NRHP properties are known to have been altered in 2018, based on
project approval by Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission and/or staff. Most of
these properties are located within National Register Historic Districts. The list does not
include repair projects that were issued a Certificate of No Material Effect; list does not
include interior alterations. The list does not include driveway or garage alterations,
demolitions or new construction, even when the garage is historic.
720 N. Dodge Street: new addition
8 Bella `M sta Place, asc-mpr t e4gre5r window addition, entry canopy alteration
10 S. Gilbert Street: stair and elevator addition
203 N. Linn Street: intrusive awning removal **
708 Grant Street: intrusive awning and porch enclosure removal**
325 S. Summit Street: window opening removal
818 S. Summit Street: window size alteration
706 E. College Street: chimney reconstruction and basement egress window addition,
window removal
314 Summit Street: front door and baluster replacement**
815 Brown Street: metal roof replacement and non -historic chimney demolition**
815 Brown Street: chimney demolition
725 N. Linn Street: rear addition
404 Brown Street: rear addition, rear window reconfiguration
528 N. Gilbert Street: rear step and soffit reconstruction*
513 S. Summit Street: radon system installation*
420 N. Linn Street: porch skirting reconstruction*
1118 E. Court Street: rear window replacement*
727 N. Lucas Street: stoop and stair reconstruction*
CLG Annual Report 2018
1206 E. Court Street: front step reconstruction, porch enclosure demolition*
821 N. Johnson Street: rear entry reconfigurotion
1049 Woodlawn Avenue: front step and handrail reconstruction*
737 Grant Street: rear window replacement*
1154 E. Court Street: front step reconstruction and rear sleeping porch conversion
115 S. Dubuque Street: new exterior signage
755 Oakland Avenue: ramp removal and stoop and stair reconstruction*
900 N. Johnson Street: radon system installation*
412 S. Summit Street: roof replacement*
727 N. Lucas Street: roof replacement*
902 S. Summit Street; previous addition demolition and new addition
709 Oakland Avenue: front door replacement*
608 Grant Street: basement window removal and stair reconstruction
1033 Woodlawn Avenue: new handrail side entry*
1120 Sheridan Avenue: window alteration
530 S. Summit Street: rear breezeway column and frieze reconstruction*
1205 Seymour Avenue: front step reconstruction*
*denotes Minor Review
**denotes Intermediate Review
3. In 2018, how many additional properties did your city place on its list of localiv
designated historic landmarks and/or historic districts?
Most of Iowa's CLGs do not have a local designation program. If you have questions
about whether you have a locally designation program or not, please contact Paula
Mohr before you complete this section.
(As a reminder, before your elected officials approve or change local districts or
ordinances, you must send a copy to the State Historic Preservation Office for review and
comment. Please allow at least 45 days for our review) Please attach a copy of the final
designation nomination(s) and ordinance(s).
Reviewed by the HPC In December 2017 as a group of seven local landmarks. Five were
successfully designated in 2018. Ordinances and Commission proceedings are attached
in the following order:
* 412 N. Dubuque Street, David Boa rts. (Sylvan us Johnson) House
* 213 E. Market Street, Anton Geiger House
* 504 E. Bloomington Street, George and Helen Hummer House
* 1029 N. Dodge Street, Parrott House
* 715 Park Road, Albert Henry Byfield House (NR listed in 2017)
Date the ordinance(s) reviewed and commented by SHPO
Letter sent to SHPO requesting review December 7, 2017
CLG Annual Report 2018
4. in 2018, what were the actions to revise, amend, change, or de -list a locally
designated property? Please attach documentation of the review and appeal process
and decisions made by the historic preservation commission, planning and zone
commission, city Council, District Court or other governmental agency or official
involved with the process. (use additional pages if needed)
In September 2018, the Commission reviewed and approved an application to
demolish the primary structure at 628 S. Lucas Street, a contributing resource in the
locally designated Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District. The Commission
proceedings are attached. The approval was based on the deteriorated condition of the
building and the Commission's ability to approve the replacement structure. No other
agencies were involved.
Section II
Managing, Protecting, and Preserving Historic Properties
♦ The CLG will enforce all appropriate state and local ordinances for designating and
protecting historic properties
♦ The CLG shall provide for adequate public participation in the local historic
preservation programs
4. Did your city, county, LUD or its historic preservation commission undertake any
of the following activities in 2018? Please think broadly about this question and
include any activity (small or large) that facilitated historic preservation in your
community. This is your opportunity to boast about your accomplishments and
get credit for the great work you dol (use additional pages if needed)
a. Historic preservation planning. Examples include the development or revision of
a preservation plan, development of a work plan for your commission, etc. (use
additional pages if needed)
• The Commission developed a 2018 work Plan. It is attached
• Historic Preservation Strategic Planning. For City budget conversations, a
strategic planning document was created at the end of 2017. It provides
information on work completed and in progress. It is attached.
• The Survey and Evaluation update of the Central Business District (listed
above in section 1) will be utilized to facilitate any future planning for a
National Register or Local historic district in the area.
b. Provided technical assistance on historic preservation issues or projects.
Examples include working with individual property owners, business owners,
institutions to identify appropriate treatments and find appropriate materials,
research advice, etc. Please be specific (use additional pages if needed)
r The Commission staff provides technical and design assistance to applicants
for Historic Review. The applicants are encouraged to meet with the staff
CLG Annual Report 2018
well ahead of time in the project planning process, prior to submitting
applications, to discuss their projects. In 2018 we processed 104 applications
'for review that resulted in either a Certificate of Appropriateness or a
Certificate of No Material Effect. This is a 13% increase over 2017's
application count which was in turn a 5% increase over 2016's count and a
13.5% increase over 2015's count. In the past 4 years we have seen a 28%
increase in historic reviews.
• Staff continued to implement the Preservation Fund which was launched July
1, 2017. The Preservation Fund provides $5,000 matching grants or loans to
property owners for eligible exterior work on historic properties in Historic or
Conservation Districts or on Local Landmarks. The budget provides funding
for 8 projects per fiscal year. While in 2017 (calendar year) only one project
was approved, in 2018 (bridging two fiscal years)12 projects were approved.
• Staff and a Commissioner reviewed and evaluated potential sites for the
relocation of the historic 5anxay-Gilmore House from its location at 109
Market Street.
• As part of Section 106 Review, staff and the Commission reviewed a project
for replacement antennas on the National Register listed Johnson County
Savings Bank 102 S. Clinton Street.
• As part of Section 106 Review, staff and the Commission reviewed a project
for replacement light poles that would include cellular equipment installation
in several National Register Historic Districts.
• Staff works internally as a resource for other City departments on projects
that would include historic resources. For instance, staff reviewed new
exterior lighting for the National Register listed Old Post Office at 28 S. Linn
Street, which serves as the Senior Center. Staff also assisted in locating
qualified plaster repair contractors for interior work at this building.
• Staff and the Commission reviewed a proposed incentive, Transfer of
Development Rights, which would have, been a benefit for owners of historic
buildings. The proposal ultimately was not adopted
c. Sponsored public educational programming in historic preservation. Examples
include training sessions offered to the public, walking tours, open houses,
lectures, Preservation Month activities, etc. (use additional pages if needed)
• January 2018, Historic Preservation Awards: home owners, contractors,
craftspersons, consultants, as well as members of the community were
honored for their historically appropriate work on nineteen historic
properties in the 36th annual event celebrating historic preservation.
• January 18, 2018 Commission Chair and a former Commission Chair held a
public education session for the Newcomers Group of the University
Women's Club. The session discussed how preservation began in Iowa City
and included the talk, Interesting Women and Well -Preserved Houses.
CLG Annual Report 2018
• February 2018 staff participated with Friends of Historic Preservation in the
Iowa City Archives Crawl sponsored by the Iowa City Public Library which
presented information about local resources and archival items at the library.
Local historical groups also shared insights into collecting and preserving
history.
• March 20, 2018 staff was interviewed by City Channel 4 for a short segment
on Historic Preservation projects and funding
• October 22, 2018 the Commission hosted a public presentation in the Senate
Chamber of the Old Capitol building where consultant Alexa McDowell of
AKAY Consulting presented the findings and recommendations from her
2018 Survey and Evaluation Update: Iowa City Central Business District. The
next morning, she made the same presentation to the City Council at a work
session.
• December 19, 2018 staff and one Commissioner were part of a panel who
recorded a podcast through City Channel 4 discussing historic preservation in
Iowa City.
• Historic Preservation Commission Facebook Page: Staff maintains a Facebook
page for community education and outreach.
• City Staff developed a specific project page on the City Website for the
Downtown District Survey
5. If the city or county amended its historic preservation ordinance or resolution or
passed additional ordinances or resolutions that impact historic properties,
please attach copies of the amendments and new ordinances or resolutions.
(As a reminder, before your elected officials approve local districts or ordinances,
you must send a copy to the State Historic Preservation Office for comment.
Please allow at least 45 days for our review.)
None in 2018
6. If new or revised design standards and/or guidelines were developed and
adopted during 2018, please attach a copy.
(Guidelines were amended so that 5 project types were approved for a staff -
level (Minor review instead of requiring full Commission Review. All were
actions that do not qualify for a Certificate of No Material Effect. The five
projects or actions are:
• Specific types of roofing replacement
• New driveways and curb cuts meeting specific requirements
• Specific types of door replacement
• Synthetic siding removal
• Window and door changes to the rear of a property that meet specific
requirements.
Certificates of Appropriateness defining the specific requirements are attached.
CLG Annual Report 2018
8. Are there any particular issues, challenges, and/or successes your preservation
commission has encountered or accomplished this year? (use additional pages if
needed)
• The Historic Preservation Fund (a grant and no -interest loan program) has allowed
and will continue to allow property owners to take the extra steps they might not
otherwise take when rehabilitating the exterior of their properties. It has been
beneficial in the effort to prevent the loss of historic materials.
• Staff was granted a temporary addition of 10 hours per week of staff time for the
first ten months of 2018 because of other staffing shortages that reduced the
assistance available from the Senior Planner who regularly assisted. This additional
time allowed staff to act as dedicated contact on historic preservation for the
community and other staff. It also helped us to maintain good customer service
through additional assistance to applicants and maintaining a quick response time
even though we have seen an increase in reviews. This time was instrumental in
staffs ability to maintain progress on our many ongoing grant projects. it also
allowed staff to be able to take on the additional projects that regularly arise from
other staff or the community.
• Staff and the Commission have been working on efforts to save the Sanxay-Gilmore
House at 109 Market Street from demolition and was successful in acquiring a grant
to hire a consultant to evaluate a potential relocation.
• Staff has been working to implement the three CLG grants that were approved for
2018.
• While the Commission had started the process -for a local historic District designation
in the vicinity of our historic passenger train depot, it was withdrawn prior to
proceeding to City Council. Several property owners had questioned the district
boundaries and the decision was made to proceed with the National Register
Historic District first (for which we received a CLG grant) so that a formal opinion
would be available in regard to the district boundaries.
Staff and the Commission lost several long-time members this year. Four
Commissioners retired because of term -limits and the Commission lost 53 years of
combined institutional memory. The Senior Planner who had helped staff on a
regular basis (at least 10 hours per week) and had acted as the main point of contact
for historic preservation, retired. During his 28 years at the City he had worked
through the development of many of Iowa City s historic Districts and local
ordinances and regulations. This loss of Institutional memory has been difficult to
overcome.
• Once staff time returned to the budgeted half-time appointment in November 2018,
a loss in response time and the ability to meet deadlines occurred. Continued
increases in reviews coupled with on -going and future projects at this staffing level
will put a strain on the ability to continue with the successes we have seen over the
past four years.
CLG Annual Report 2019
9. Does your commission have a website and if so, what is the address?
https://www icgov ore/city-government/departments-and-divisions/historic-
preservation
https:Hwww.icgov.org/proiect/downtown-historic-surveV
https://www.icgov.org/historicpreservation resources
https://www.facebook.com/lowaCitvHPC/
Section III
Historic Preservation Program Administration
• The CLG will organize and maintain a historic preservation commission, which must
meet at least three (3) times per year.
• The commission will be composed of community members with a demonstrated
positive interest in historic preservation, or closely related fields, to the extent
available in the community.
• The commission will comply with Iowa Code Chapter 21(open meetings) in its
operations.
• Commission members will participate in state -sponsored or state -approved historic
preservation training activities.
10. List dates of meetings held (please note these are meetings actually held with a
quorum, not just those that were scheduled).
• January 11, 2018
• February 8, 2018
• March 8, 2018
• ApO 12, 2,018
• May 10, 2018
• June 14, 2018
• July 12, 2018
• August 9, 2018
• August 23, 2018
• September 13, 2018
• October 11, 2018
• November 8, 2018
• December 13, 2018
11. We recommend that each commission have a budget with a minimum of $750 to
pay for training and other commission expenses. In 2018, what was the dollar amount
for the historic preservation commission's annual budget?
Commission staff enjoyed a temporary Increase of 10 hours per week from November
15, 2017 to November 1, 2018. Because this time was temporary and not budgeted, it
is not included in this amount. The budget utilized for 2018 included W,000 for staff
CLG Annual Report 2018
salary and benefits and $40,000 for the new Preservation Fund Program. $1,000 is
typically budgeted for training. In 2018 $1,920 was utilized for Staff and Commissioner
training because of the increased cost of the yearly preservation conference.
12. Where are your official CLG files located?
Neighborhood Development Services Department of City Hall
13. Each commission should develop a work plan for the coming year. This work plan
should include the project(s), initiatives and programs you plan to begin or complete.
Please attach your work plan to your annual report.
14. Please update the attached CLG Personnel Information Table (this must be
completed).
15. Please attach biographical sketches for commissioners who were newly appointed in
2018 or 2019. Please be sure newly appointed commissioners sign and date their
statement.
16. Please complete the 2018 Commission Training Table.
PLEASE SIGN and DATE
Signature of person who completed this report Date
Signature of Mayor or Chairman of the Board of Supervisors Date
Please retain a copy for your official CLG file and send a PDF of the signed document to
paula.mohrPiowa.aov. OR you can mail a hard copy with original signatures to the
address below. The deadline is February 28, 2019.
Paula A. Mohr
State Historical Society of Iowa
600 East Locust St,
Des Moines IA 50319-0290
Paula,mohr@iowa.Qov
If you have questions, please contact me at: (515) 281-6826.
Thank you for your timely responsel
CLG Annual Report 2018
R IowaCity
W MA City Hall, 410 y Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240
Memorandum
Date: February 6, 2019
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner
Re: 2019 Historic Preservation Commission Work Plan
At the February 14 meeting, we will discuss the Commission's work plan for 2019 and beyond. The
Commission's 2018 work plan is attached. In addition, a strategic planning document created in November
2017 is attached for further reference. Staff will report on the progress of these issues during the meeting and
the Commission will create a new work plan that will be shared with the City Manager and City Council.
You may also want to refer to the Executive Summary or the Historic Preservation Plan or the complete
preservation plan for details regarding the goals and objectives of the Commission. Commissioners should
use the preservation plan to formulate a work plan for the year.
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Annual Planning Session Report
Priority Issues for 2018
The Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission held its annual planning session on Thursday, February 8, 2018,
as part of its regular monthly meeting, at 5:30 p.m. in Emma Harvat Hall. At this time, the Commission discussed
and prioritized its activities and projects for the 2618 calendar year. Each year the Commission holds a planning
session to review its progress in implementing the goals and objectives of the Historic Preservation Plan, and to
set objectives for the upcoming year. This report details the results of that planning session, and is intended to
serve as a guide for the Commission's activities for the upcoming calendar year.
Key Projects:
The Commission felt it was important to focus its efforts on current active projects for the upcoming year. These
key projects include elements of many of the Goals outlined in Iowa City's Historic Preservation Plan.
Local Landmark Designations: Originally added to the work plan during the 2015 calendar year, the
Commission determined that the proactive effort to identify and nominate potential landmark properties is a critical
project for continuation. Properties have been identified and researched by staff and a Commission Sub-
committee. In 2017, a selection of 6 brick structures that represent selections of city history began the local
landmark process. A National Register listed property was included in the group. In March the properties will be
presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. They will come before City Council after that. Once
completed the Commission will likely begin the process for more properties.
Civil Rights Grant Implementation: In late 2016, the City was successful in a grant request for the National
Register Nomination, signage, and educational materials for the Tate Arms on Dubuque Street and Iowa
Federation Home on Iowa Avenue. A committee including individuals in both the Preservation and African
American communities has begun to discuss educational materials for those properties. The Office of the State
Archeologist is preparing the National Register Nomination.
Downtown District Survey Implementation: At the request of City Council, an updated downtown survey is
underway and will be completed by June 1, 2018. The Commission is working with Alexa McDowell of Akay
Consulting to review and update the 2001 survey to identify properties and/or areas of downtown that are eligible
for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Upon receipt of the results and recommendations generated
from this survey, the Commission will have to re-evaluate its work plan to see how downtown preservation
initiatives should be prioritized.
Other Current Issues:
HRDP Cabin Grant Implementation: In June 2016, the City was successful in a grant request to rehabilitate the
roof structures of the City Park Cabins. Staff will continue to work with the Parks and Recreation Department as
they implement the grant. The entire cabin rehabilitation project, including roof rehabilitation, is set to be complete
by October 1, 2018.
Historic Preservation Fund rollout: Staff and the Commission had a soft rollout of the new Historic Preservation
Fund. A press release will soon be sent out to increase public knowledge of the program.
Certified Local Government (CLG) Grants: In September 2017 the Commission was successful in three grant
requests. Staff will create a Request for Proposal for each project. Consultants will then be hired. The grants
include a preservation plan for the Summit Street Monument, National Register Nomination for the proposed
Clinton Street and Railroad Historic District, and an intensive -level survey of the property at 2040 Waterfront
Drive.
Efforts to preserve the Sanxay-Gilmore House and the Park House HoteU St. Agatha's historic courtyard:
The Chair of the Commission will continue to work on efforts to save the house from demolition while maintaining
the Park House Hotel/St. Agatha's historic courtyard.
Walking and Biking Tour Maps: In the past, the Commission had developed walking -tour maps of historic
districts and landmark properties. The Commission will update them with volunteer help so that they may be
included for RAGBRAI celebrations if needed and for public use.
Commission Members: In July 2018, the Commission will lose four of its longest -serving Commissioners. In
order to meet the Certified Local Government conditions, the Commission will make an effort to recruit applicants
that meet several of the professional areas required by the State.
Other Issues for Future Consideration beyond 2018:
Preservation Conference: The Commission will work toward preparing for the possibility of hosting the Annual
Iowa Preservation Summit in 2021. Working with Economic Development and the Chamber of Commerce the
Commission will apply for a Certified Local Government Grant in 2019 to host the Summit.
Education/Outreach: This includes efforts to organize special events and assist in the planning for the annual
awards program in January. Many of the maps, brochures and other publications produced by the Commission in
the past are in need of an update for web -based distribution.
Digital Library: The City has valuable resources and information on historic properties in several different
formats. Currently the ability for the public to access this information is dependent upon the format of the
information. Digitizing hardcopy information and combining it in with existing digital information in a searchable
online database would make this information about city history more available for property owners and
researchers.
Design Guideline Update: The current Historic Preservation Handbook, adopted in September 2010 and revised
from the original adoption in June 2000, will need to be revised to include the current updated maps of all districts,
revised lists of local and National Register landmarks, and updated guidelines. While it does not appear that
major changes will be necessary, the update will ensure consistency.
Tax Abatement: The Commission and other local preservation groups may consider working with the county to
develop and implement a state -mandated property tax abatement program.
Additional Survey and Evaluation Work: Additional survey areas for the Commission to consider in future years
include Kirkwood Avenue and the Lucas Farms Neighborhood.
Other Items:
• Continue annual reminder letter to Historic and Conservation District and Landmark property owners and
possibly develop this into a friendly brochure.
• Continue to update the Iowa City Historic Preservation Facebook Page.
Continue to work with other Iowa City and Johnson County preservation organizations.
February 2018
Strategic Plan: Historic 1reservation
'Fop 3-5 accomplislatitents over the past two years
• Successful Grant Applications
o HRDP Grant for Cabins- Summer 2016
o National Park Service Civil Grant for Tate Arms and Iowa Federation Home
0 National Trust Grant toward the budget of the Downtown survey
• Implementation of the Historic Preservation Fund
• Greater Commission social Media Presence- Facebook page
• Successful preservation of historic properties such as the Unitarian -Universalist Church
• Disseminated information about State and Federal Tax Credits. Several owners are seeking them
based on our recommendation
0 917 Bowery Street
0 304 Summit Street
0 623 College Street
0 317 Fairchild Street
0 706 College Street
0 120 Fairchild Street
o 414 Brown Street
Ali In pvogiress Rents for the uperrjridr: g two years
• Completion of Clinton Street and Railroad Historic District
• Completion of seven individual local landmarks
• Completion of the Downtown District Survey Evaluation and the formation of any Historic
District found
• Implementation of any CLG grants received of the three submitted (will know in December)
• 2020 Preservation Summit in Iowa City
o CLG Grant Application due September 1, 2018
o Organization of the local component of the Preservation Summit
• Update of the Iowa City Preservation Handbook
o Review needs for individual guideline changes, all windows, doors, roofs, etc
o Review property contribution status for accuracy
3-5 highest ;priorities for upcorimy g two years
2020 Preservation Summit in Iowa City of Iowa City
• Update of the Iowa City Preservation Handbook
• Local landmarks for the remaining properties in the Commission's work plan
0 Northside District expansion
o Foxhead District
'Strategic Plan, Historic Preservation
o 8 additional individual landmarks
• Formation of a Kirkwood Avenue Historic District
JL-2 fop fa`O..mis areas for Pv1a-nv- je-`T,neiT4: teaa-m for next two y--Irs
Staffing to be able to pursue the Commission's long term planning goals in addition to the
review of applications (which consume most of the staff time currently)
• Public education and outreach
3-5 'biggas€ e;iap-I?Ga1ges for aex'L tvvu years
4 longtime Commissioners including Chair, Vice Chair and Contractor Representative will be
leaving the Commission. As new leaders emerge there will be a steep learning curve
Getting our local State and Federal tax credit projects to finish
o This is up to the owner but can we help in away that would get them closer to the finish
line
o We have had fewer state and federal tax credit projects than many communities our
size
o Could we help write architectural descriptions and draw sketch plans to help owners
without these skills and have the staff time to do so?
• Guidelines need to be updated
Extremely limited digital presence increases the need for staff to provide information
o Continuing to educate the public on the guidelines and benefits of preservation
o Providing information needed for researchers and for tax credits
3-S -ggest opplorl "U xE,pS fc.; -oext two o years
• 2020 Preservation Summit in Iowa City of Iowa City
o Apply for a CLG grant in 2018 to pay for elements
o Will bring in about 300 preservationists from across the Midwest to see our
preservation efforts
o Many educational sessions
o Opportunities for tours and workshops related to our Community
• Formation of a Kirkwood Avenue Historic District
• HRDP grant application to digitize and disseminate HPC collection
o All historic analysis
o Photography
o Online database
o Grant implementation
o Increase digital presence
0 Utilizing the Preservation Fund widely in the Community
Strategic Dian: HistO is :Preservation
o Improving the condition of our historic properties
o Improving our relationship with property owners in the community
• Initial evaluation of our Mid -Century Modern Housing Stock and plan for preservation
i
Iowa City
Historic Preservation Commission
City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240
Attachments are not included.
Memorandum Attachment 1 and 2 are in the
Date: January30, 2019 December 13, 2018 HPC
To: Geoff Fruln, City Manager Agenda Packet.
From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Attachment 3 is in the January
Re: Downtown District Survey Recommendations 10, 2018 HPC Agenda Packet.
Introduction:
Following the completion of the 2018 Survey and Evaluation Update: Iowa City Central Business
District, by Alexa McDowell of AKAY Consulting, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) hosted a
public presentation of the results on October 22, 2018 followed by a presentation to City Council at a
work session on October 23, 2018. During the work session, Council directed HPC to review the
recommendations included in the report portion of the Survey and to provide information on the process
for implementing each one with recommendations on proceeding.
Background:
During the December 13, 2018 HPC Meeting the recommendations from the survey were presented
and discussed in preparation for making a recommendation to City Council to proceed. The
memorandum to HPC that guided the discussion is attached [Attachment 1]. In addition to the memo,
the Commission Chair had also submitted a letter to HPC with the goal of Including his opinions so that
he could focus on facilitating the discussion during the meeting [Attachment 2]. The discussion began
with a staff presentation outlining in a brief overview each of the recommendations individually. This
presentation was followed by public comments and then HPC discussion of the recommendations as a
group. The minutes from the meeting are included [Attachment 3].
Public Discussion: Two members of the public commented and added to the discussion of the
recommendations. Ginalie Swaim spoke representing Friends of Historic Preservation (FHP) as a new
board member. She noted that urban renewal is a large part of Iowa City History and thought the larger
district boundary area was appropriate and a "wise and respectful way to look at the history of the
community" and that the Commission should begin this process. She discussed the importance of the
historic character of downtown and stressed that the "Downtown District is Iowa City's largest cultural
asset in built form." She emphasized the importance of education, outreach, and the dissemination of
information by digitizing historic resources, all recommendations included in the report. She stated that
FHP will help with education as is possible. She also supported several other elements discussed in the
presentation: finding time and money for staff to be able to implement recommendations, Kevin Boyd's
idea of creating a working group, and the designation of a local district when that eventually moves
forward. She concluded by pointing out that while a residential district is mostly the concern of owners
and residents, the downtown is also about the users. She and FHP support nomination of a National
Register Historic District and then designation of a local district.
Nancy Bird, Executive Director of the Iowa City Downtown District (ICDD) spoke next. She said that the
National Register District sounds like a really good idea but is also very complex and requires
significant educational outreach. She said the ICDD would be a partner in that process. She cautioned
about moving too quickly on the local district designation because it may discourage some people. Bird
was supportive of a steering committee to consider the local ordinance issue because, similar to
1
Iowa City
Historic Preservation Commission
City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240
involving additional City staff time, it also involved more staff time for each property owner. In her
discussion, preservation did not seem to be the crux of the issue, it was more about time -commitment
and resources for property and business owners. Bird also stressed that the ICDD had completed an
involved process to develop their 2015 Iowa City Downtown District Storefront and Signage Guidelines
and felt that this would be a good starting point for the development of district review guidelines. Bird
concluded by stating that the National Register is a great first step but that communication with property
owners about their issues and building maintenance will be a very important part of the process.
Commission Discussion:
Following a brief discussion of the timeline for a National Register District Nomination and local
designation processes, a consensus was noted for pursuing a National Register District with the urban
renewal period included. While one commissioner proposed adding the qualification that a local district
would not be discussed until the National Register District was completed, others felt that was too
restrictive. The Chair felt that the proposed steering committee could ensure that the appropriate
communication could occur prior to the committee recommending the commencement of a local district.
He also felt that the steering committee could work to develop a plan moving forward to investigate
financial and non -financial incentives. The importance of developing incentives was echoed by other
commissioners. The Chair also called for the recommendation on digitizing resources to be added to a
future agenda for investigation and discussion. The final approved Motion (9-0, Kuenzli absent) is as
follows
The Historic Preservation Commission recommends the City Council direct staff to
immediately pursue a National Register nomination, which will include public outreach, a
formal opinion from the State Historic Preservation Office, and hiring a consultant to
begin the National Register Nomination.
Implementation:
Staff has already sought a formal opinion from the state on the inclusion of urban renewal in the
National Register District boundary. That opinion should be available in early February. A National
Register Nomination process will need to meet several key deadlines with the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO). At this point, it is unknown if a consultant would be able to meet the first
deadline of April 1, 2019. If this is possible, the district could be through the state process by mid -
October 2019 and a final designation from the National Park Service could be available in December
2019. If this first deadline is not met the next deadline could result in a designation in May 2020. The
Commission and the Downtown District appear to be prepared to form a steering committee and begin
conversations immediately which could coincide with the hiring of a consultant and the beginning of the
Nomination Forms. As the Nomination proceeds through the process, the steering committee could
look at other recommendations and facilitate education and communication with owners and the public.
A potential local district could be developed based on these discussions and the early feedback from
SHPO on the Nomination during their reviews.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends pursuing a formal estimate from Alexa McDowell of AKAY Consulting for the
preparation of the National Register Nomination Forms. Initial estimates in the $12,000 to $15,000
range and could be refined following the receipt of a formal opinion on the urban renewal context in the
next 10 days. If the estimate is as expected it is recommended to implement a consultant contract and
develop the steering committee to proceed immediately, determining the timing and specifics of a local
district at a later date.
;i- F , j E
KIM
The Preserve Iowa Summit is the states premier
conference for professionals and volunteers involved
In historic preservation. You will have opportunities to
learn about a broad range of preservation topics from
historic tax credits to archaeology and morel Saturday
will be devoted to sessions of particular Interest to those
working in historical societies and local history museums.
The theme of this year's conference, Reinvention through
Rehabilitation, draws on Newton's recent revitalization
success where historic preservation was a key part of the
dtys economic development strategy.
Other highlights include the "Preservation Projects
of Merit" and Preservation Iowa's "Preservation at its
Best" awards ceremony, an exhibit hall and plenty of
networking opportunities.
Who should attend?
• Historic property owners
• Members of historic preservation commissions
• Historic preservation, planning, interior design and
architecture students
• Main Street staff and board members
• Preservation professionals, consultants and
enthusiasts
• Developers
• Planning professionals
• Local government officials
• Community leaders and civic organizations
• Architects (Please watch the website for updates about
Continuing Education System credits)
• Citizens Interested in their communitys quality of life
The Summit N a coordinated effort of the Iowa Department of
Cultural AJf W State Historic Preservation OjJJcQ, City of Newton,
Newton Historic Preservation Commission and Preservation laawit
is funded in port with Federal funds from the Notlarrol Pork Service
U. S. Deportment of the Interior.
SIATF
UWE OF 10M IOWA MWItm
wn®eam•uuec
�L
preserveiowasummit. org
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
January 10, 2019
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kevin Boyd, Zach Builta, Helen Burford, Sharon DeGraw, G. T.
Karr, Cecile Kuenzli, Quentin Pitzen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Thomas Agran, Gosia Clore, Lee Shope
STAFF PRESENT: Jessica Bristow
OTHERS PRESENT: None
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action)
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Boyd called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS — CONSENT AGENDA:
803 Church Street — Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District (porch reconstruction).
Bristow explained this property is near Ace Hardware and was built originally as a two-story
gable. She said the side addition was added later and there was a whole back addition with a
two -car garage underneath. The front porch will be replaced with this project.
Bristow shared slides showing fish scale shingles in the gables and vinyl siding and soffits on
the porch. She said the porch has its original roof structure but everything else below has been
replaced. The roof has been failing. Because of this and failures in the newer parts of the porch,
and the fact that it is an enclosed porch, which is discouraged in an historic district, staff
recommends demolition of the existing porch.
Bristow showed a 1926 view obtained from Sanborn fire insurance maps that shows the first
section of the house, the one and one-half story gable to the side with two porches. She saic
the porch being discussed faces Church Street.
Bristow said Staff had to look at some of the houses in the neighborhood to come up with a
replacement plan. She showed porch examples to help explain the proposal. She said the
owner proposed a solid railing because she has had an enclosed porch for the entire 30 or 40
years that she has lived there so she does not want an exposed front porch. It will be a little
porch in the corner of the L of the house.
Bristow shared one example with a very ornamental and spindled porch, believed to be more
accurate to the original on this house. She said because the porch is being replaced completely,
not retaining anything original, this kind of ornament would not be used, but it shows the roof
line and how it fits with the house. It is a pretty flat roof that comes into the corner of the meeting
of the two gables. There would be a pilaster orengaged column back against the wall that
supports the back of the porch and a few columns out along the front.
Bristow said this project would have a more simple, basic column. It would fit in the corner of the
L and extend the same depth as the current porch since we know that roof structure is original
on the porch. She said the overhang is known and there would be a pilaster orengaged post at
the side wall and one at the outer corner and, just to keep it simple, there would be only one
column in the span.
Bristow displayed slides of the porch now and what it could look like. She said Staff looked at
reference materials for simple ways to replace some of these porch elements. She displayed a
drawing with a simple, 6 x 6 column that a contractor could make and it would look appropriate
with the house.
Bristow said the project would remove the existing porch, which probably has an original roof
that is heavily deteriorated, but nothing else that's original. She said the porch would be rebuilt
completely with a new roof with external gutters instead of an internal gutter, and new floor
structure, new columns, and a solid baluster. The owner is being encouraged to leave the
exposed lap siding that is in there already without trying to cover it. Bristow thought the owner's
goal down the road would be to remove the vinyl siding from the rest of the house.
Kuenzli said she understood the reason for the solid panel enclosing on the front porch, but
noted it was related more to a Craftsman style than a Queen Anne style. She wondered about
instead using square spindles to keep it simple, spaced closely together, with the space
between the spindles equal to the width of the spindles, to still maintain a sense of privacy but
be stylistically more accurate for the period of the house.
Bristow said the owner is very hesitant about not having an enclosed porch anymore. She
knows the porch needs to be rebuilt because of its deterioration but her intent, originally, was to
rebuild it as a closed porch, which cannot be done according to the guidelines.
Bristow said they are getting rid of the hedge in front of the porch and it will look a lot better.
Once the porch has been opened up, the owner may be comfortable with leaving it open or with
putting in a simple square spindle railing instead. Bristow hoped the owner would decide to
forgo the solid baluster but, knowing her hesitation, Staff proposed this plan as a compromise.
DeGraw asked if the ceiling was salvageable.
Bristow did not know the extent of the damage yet. She would suggest they salvage anything
they could. She also wasn't sure about the floor and whether any of it could be salvaged.
Kuenzli asked why it was acceptable to use K-style gutters instead of specifying half -rounds.
Bristow said Staff did not specify gutters. She noted half -rounds would match what the owner
has on parts of the house, but they also have K-style. Because of the history of additions on this
house and some of the siding, there is a bit of a mixture. She thought the owner could go with
half -rounds, but it might depend on budget.
MOTION: DeGraw moved to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at
803 Church Street as presented in the application with the following condition: Porch
flooring is either vertical -grained Douglas Fir, pretreated decking with gaps under 1/8
inch, or Azek porch flooring with an eased edge. Builta seconded the motion. The motion
carried on a vote of 7-0 (Aaran. Clore. & Shope absentl.
738 Dearborn Street — Dearborn Street Conservation District (porch reconstruction).
Bristow explained this property is about midblock between Center and Sheridan. It is a 1924-ish
bungalow. It has had some additions and changes, but it does have an original stucco coating
on the walls. She said her documents state the walls are tile construction but did not know if
that's what was found in the work that had been done in the past
Bristow shared slides demonstrating the front porch currently has wrought iron railing and
columns. The porch floor structure has been redone and the skirting around the porch is a
decorative concrete block. She said the applicants came in because the columns were starting
to deteriorate. It was time to replace them and to get something a bit more appropriate to the
home.
Bristow said she looked at the porch and shared a picture noting remnants from the past that
were still there and that would be retained. By looking at the remnants, Bristow felt the original
porch had a kind of paired column not often seen in Iowa City, something a bit more ornamental
and more expensive to build.
Staff ended up going with a taller masonry pier that extends above the porch floor and has a
battered column that rests on top of it. Bristow shared an example that has been used for a few
other projects, including at 741 Grant Street. She pointed out the masonry has a cap and the
battered column has its own base with its own capital and will be the model for this project.
Emerson Andrishok did both the sketches and the rendering for this project.
Bristow shared the drawing of the column, which will have a masonry base. She said the
existing skirting, the decorative concrete, will be cut back so that the piers can be attached into
the corner of the porch with the battered column above. The railing is a square spindled railing
with a little bit of a solid area in the middle, which is found on a few other bungalows like this. It
also alleviates the long run of the railing. Bristow shared Emerson's rendering of the porch. She
said given the substantial change this will make to this porch, Staff finds it appropriate.
MOTION: DeGraw moved to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at
738 Dearborn Street as presented in the application. Builta seconded the motion. The
motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Aaran. Clore. & Shope absentl.
REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF
Minor Review— Staff Review.
1205 Sevmour Avenue — Lonafellow Historic District (front entry step replacement
Bristow said this is not an historic landing and it is being replaced similar to the way it is. There
will be no skirting because it is pretty close to the ground. She said it was probably originally a
little concrete step like all the neighbors, but there is no real reason to do that again because it
is a little cost prohibitive. She said it will be painted or stained this time so it will last longer.
Along with this, the owners have a rotten window sill they are replacing and a storm door. While
not regulated, they are having a new custom one remade.
530 Summit Street— Summit Street Historic District (rear breezeway column and frieze
reconstruction).
Bristow said there is a breezeway in the back of this house. The property has been for sale for a
while. She said she received a call stating things had been removed without permission.. They
are going to put back the columns, but in a more substantial and accurate size. They will do the
arches again because it could have originally had the arches.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 13, 2018
MOTION: Kuenzli moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's
December 13, 2018 meeting. Karr seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0
(Agran, Clore, & Shope absent).
COMMISSION INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION:
2018 Historic Preservation Awards.
Bristow reminded everyone to come if they could. She said the only thing not decided is what to
get for refreshments and welcomed suggestions. A few were given. Costs and funding options
were discussed. Bristow noted the award ceremony is a way for the Commission to reach out to
the public, show what has been accomplished, and gain support.
Previous Agenda Items.
Downtown District.
Boyd said the City Council is going to have a work session to talk about the Commission's
recommendations to move forward on the National Historic District and to create some kind of
working group. The Downtown District, which spoke last month in favor of the National Historic
District, is preparing to write a letter from their board stating the same.
Transfer of Development Rights.
Boyd said Council decided not to do this.
410/412 Clinton Street.
Boyd said 410/412 Clinton Street needed six votes on Tuesday night and got five, so it will not
be a local landmark. Susan Mims and Mazahir Salih were the two no votes.
Market Street.
Bristow said staff has been working with a structural engineer and historic architect as a
consultant to evaluate sites, moving, rehabilitation, and are working on the budget.
Bristow said she had thrown together a very basic budget at one point. The City Manager
wanted a memo about it so it could go into their work session for the budget. The numbers
included the move, but then also making it structurally stable on its new site and moth -balling it,
as well as the cost for someone to rehab the property. Council had a work session about it on
Saturday and Bristow was at their follow-up work session Tuesday to answer questions. She
thought their overall feeling was that the rehab number was astronomical, but it is also not
something that the City needs to do unless the City rehabs it.
Bristow said originally the University wanted to buy all those houses, take them down and build
an entrepreneurial business center, but they are not doing that. Now they are going to take them
down and retaining it as open space.
Because that situation has changed, the Mayor has proposed that he and the City Manager
meet with the University to discuss leaving it in place. The Mayor feels that as the oldest
residential house left in town, it is important to save it.
Bristow said the consultant is developing an official draft report which will include the costs so
those costs can be explained a bit more for Council. Since all of the costs change a lot
depending on the site, it will be an estimate.
Bristow said if Council can come up with a budget placemark and then pick a site, the final
version could have real numbers related to that site. Bristow thought the official draft of the
architect's proposal would be available before the end of the month.
Bristow thought the University wanted the house gone by August 1 st but hoped that date could
be negotiated.
DeGraw asked for the estimated cost to move the property.
Bristow did not have the numbers with her, but thought the original place -holder estimate was
$330,000. The updated numbers added $182,000 to that. She pointed out the numbers are high
because the site and route with transformers and poles is not known.
Bristow noted keeping it in its current location would be the best option. If that cannot happen,
further budget discussion with Council will be needed. If Council thought the costs were too
high, they might choose not to move it, which means it will come down.
Annual Report.
Bristow said next meeting the Commission's annual report to the state would be ready for
review and a vote to approve. The report will show what we have done this past year. She also
said, depending on scheduling, their planning session could be held.
ADJOURNMENT: Kuenzli moved to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Builta.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Judy Jones
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
2018-2019
TERM
NAME
EXP.
2/8
3/8
4/12
5/10
6/14
7/12
8/9
8/23
9/13
10/11
11/08
12/13
1/10
AGRAN,
6/30/20
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
THOMAS
BAKER,
ESTHER
6/30/18
X
X
X
X
X
BOYD,
6/30/20
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
KEVI N
BUILTA
ACH ZACH ,
6/30/19
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BURFORD
, HELEN
6/30/21
--
--
--
--
--
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
CLORE,
6/30/20
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
GOSIA
DEGRAW,
SHARON
6/30/19
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
KARR, G.
6/30/20
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
T.
I
CECILE,
ECILE
6/30/19
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
MICHAUD,
6/30/18
X
X
X
X
X
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
PAM
PITZEN,
QUENTIN
6/30/21
--
--
--
--
--
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
SHOPE,
6/30/21
--
--
--
--
--
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
LEE
SWAIM,
GI NALI E
6/30/18
X
X
X
X
X
WAGNER,
6/30/18
X
X
X
X
X
FRANK
The following documents were handed
out during the meeting.
History of Stone Railroad Bridge
In East Iowa City
The Lindemann Hills Neighborhood
Researched and compiled by Florence Moore Stockman in 2007
Typists: Shannon Hunger and Mary Moore Werch
Exhibits #1-11 courtesy of State Historical Society
History of Stone Railroad Bridge in East Iowa City — The
Lindemann Hills Neighborhood
Note: It is difficult to track exactly what year and by which railroad (RR)
the actual branch line between Iowa City and Elmira ("the plug') was built.
Perhaps as many as four RR's had apart in the construction. We know
several bond issues failed in Iowa City that would have provided taxpayers
funds needed to finish the RR. It may be that private funds finally
accomplished the task. Remember this was following the Civil War and the
country, state of Iowa, and local towns had a lot of economic concerns.
So it is this author's best researched guess that the following
chronology may help with history on the stone RR bridge. The history being
intermittent may also explain why I believe the `plug line" began service
about 1873, but the stone abutments bear the date 1892.
Chronology
1865
Railroad history documents the Cedar Rapids and Saint Paul
Railway Company as being incorporated in the late 1865's. The
RR was consolidated into the Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and
Minnesota Railway Company on June 30, 1868. (See Exhibit #1;
map of 1875 with RR coming from the north into Johnson County,
and a proposed RR from Iowa City with a junction at Lennox [later
Elmira].)
The mission was to have a RR coming from the south, to the
city of Burlington via Wapello, West Branch, Cedar Rapids,
Vinton, and Waterloo; and into the state of Minnesota. Plans
moved forward — branches were built along the way until
September 1873, when all construction stopped due to financial
panic. Bonds were defaulted and the RR fell into receivership in
May 1875 and was sold to the Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and
Northern RR on June 19, 1876.
1870
The Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and Northern RR came to
West Branch from the east. Rail stations were at Morse,
Centerdale, Oasis, and Elmira. Elmira was the junction for the
branch or "plug line" into Iowa City. (See Exhibit #2 —photo of
station) Elmira was never a town, only a busy RR center. At
Elmira the Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and Northern RR connected
with two other RR's - one to Clinton and the other to Minneapolis.
The town of Elmira does not exist today. (Exhibit #3 for
1900 Atlas map) At its peak it was made up of a hotel with a
lunchroom, and also a water tower.
1873
The BCR & N Branch- called the "plug line" began service
from Iowa City to Elmira in October 1873. This was
approximately 8 miles to the northeast of Iowa City, and was
between Oasis and Morse. The primary importance was the
connecting line and a way to get to Cedar Rapids or on to Saint
Paul.
The Plug Line depot in Iowa City was where the Iowa City
Recreation building stands today. The official name was the
Burlington Street Depot or "Plug" Depot. (Seephoto Exhibit #4)
The tracks ran parallel to the Ralston Creek under the
College Street bridge; then diagonal northeast across Washington
Street, and Iowa Avenue to Jefferson Street. On Jefferson Street
the street was shared for three blocks with horse drawn vehicles.
Then diagonal, southeast across College Street and 7ch Avenue.
With continuation across Court Street, south of City High.
East Iowa City was platted for W.F. Main as a factory town
for employees of the large Puritan Factory. It was platted in 1898
as a separate town. This was a jewelry company. Later the
building housed Borner-Fry Extract Company, which
manufactured cosmetics. Next was a model airplane factory. In
1917 a sizable chair factory took over the building. The last
occupant was the National Hybrid Seed Corn Company of
2
Anamosa in 1937. A terrible fire in December of that year
completely destroyed the building and it was never rebuilt. The lot
is still vacant today and owned by Carl Chadek. The Plug RR ran
along the north side of this factory square, with a siding into the
factory to handle car loads of coal and supplies.
The Plug Line continued east and then northeast through
Scott and Graham Townships of Johnson County, to Elmira.
(Elmira called Lennox on early maps, post office called Ives; 1990
Atlas Exhibit #3) The RR was paralleling the south branch of the
Ralston Creek. Before leaving Scott Township on its way to
Elmira, the Plug made a platform stop at Graham Station (later
called Digby) to pick up passengers going north or south. (note
Digby on map)
I recall my grandfather, Nate S. Moore (1883-1966) telling
stories of riding the Plug to Digby from Iowa City as a teenager
working as a farm laborer for Lewis L. Smith. It was at this time
that he met and courted the younger sister of Lou Smith, Jane.
Nate and Jane were married in October 1903 and remained their
entire lives in east Johnson County. (See photos of Elmira and
Digby Exhibits 5-11.)
1879
The Plug Line extended service south through the siding of
Hills to What Cheer. This was in keeping with the original
mission of the Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and Minnesota RR.
1903
The Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and Northern Railway
Company of Iowa became part of the Chicago, Rock Island, and
Pacific Railway Company.
1904
The Crandic Line (Cedar Rapids and Iowa City) or
Interurban started in 1904 with hourly service to Cedar Rapids. In
Johnson County the Interurban passed through Swisher, North
3
Liberty, and Coralville. Thus the need for the Plug Line, as the
only way to get to Cedar Rapids no longer existed. The
automobile was to have an impact also.
1920
The Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and Northern branch (The
Plug) was discontinued in the late 1920's. The Burlington Street
depot was used by the Railway Express Agency for many years
however.
My brother Fred G. Moore recalls tearing up some of the
remaining track left at the depot site when he was with the Iowa
City City Engineers' Office in the early 1960's.
Today
The stone bridge over one section of the south branch of
Ralston Creek is all that remains today of the Plug Line.
(Substantial remains anyway) The stone bridge is located in Scott
Township, and consist of three abutments (Photos Exhibit #12).
The date 1892 is clearly visible on the end of one abutment. Iowa
City annexed this Lindemann farmland in the 1980's, and a
subdivision named Stone Bridge Estates was started in 2003 by
Arlington Development, Incorporated. The developer has
dedicated 1.5-1.75 acres that include the stone bridge abutments to
Iowa City for a neighborhood park and trail site. There will be
public access to this area from the west side and from Lower West
Branch Road on to the trail.
It is my vision that the Plug Line will be in use again on a
walking/biking bridge for future generations to admire and enjoy.
Thanks to the farmers and developers for preserving this piece of
Iowa City history.
Florence Moore Stockman
4
Resources
Leigh Ann Randek, Curator, Johnson County Historical Society
Charles Scott, State Historical Society, Iowa City
Herger, Mike, "Elmira, Elmira, Wherefore Art Thou Elmira" A
History of the Plug- Iowa City" Unpublished materials State
Historical Society, Iowa City
Mansheim, Gerald, "Iowa City - An Illustrated History', 1989.
Weber, Irving B., "Historical Stories About Iowa City" Volumes I,
II, IV, and VI.
Northeast Planning District Plan, Adopted June 29, 1999,
Department of Planning and Community Development, City of
Iowa City.
Special collections of the University of Iowa Libraries. Collection
of Albert N. Harbert on railroading material.
Authors own personal recollections and family interviews.
Florence Moore Stockman, 132 Eversull Lane (Part 4 — Stone
Bridge Estates), Iowa City. Photos by Mary Moore Werch.
E
EXHIBITS
1) 1875 map of a portion of Iowa City.
2) Railroad station at Elmira
3) 1900 Atlas of Johnson County
4) Burlington Street Depot
5) Hotel and Lunchroom at Elmira
6) Railroad platform and wagon; passengers waiting in Elmira.
7) Engine #549 at Elmira
8) Depot and water tower at Elmira, undated.
9) Train, water tower, and depot, Elmira, ca 1910
10) Train, passenger platform, and young woman — Digby
11) 14 passengers and one dog waiting — Elmira
12) Current photos — stone abutments; shown date "1892".
13) Current photos — Stone Bridge Estates, neighborhood children.
ri
lOII \ S Off'
I rr-
r
RSE
1' V \ \
Y• '``� � � ; !`ice � r; _ �'' � ' � ". ,
� 4
a
A �'n
#1 — 1875 map of a portion of Iowa City
#2 and #8 - Railroad station at Elmira, Iowa
#3 — 1900 Atlas of Johnson County, Iowa
MM
#4 — Burlington Street Depot, Iowa City, Iowa
#5 — Hotel and lunchroom at Elmira, Iowa
z
10
#6 — Railroad platform and wagon;
passengers waiting in Elmira, Iowa
11
t
- lop
#11 — 14 passengers and one dog waiting — Elmira, Iowa
13
�y p4r — ,i��\�y .��
y v
\ � \
�z �.,� 6�j��
��r_ fP
>>, a:
S �.
"a' :R
.,_=.�_.
j�
� � � �,
��^
_�_
��
�t_�
. � �,�
d' �''
fi
t
_
�
�
<
n
,
11
/J//
�
'� \
�\
�
� \;
\
2rl
1"T R "iT
i ➢/• A � .� �' f� � i Cif
i
t
.%Z �i„ ._
Brock Hunger, Jaymi Smith, Braxton Bell, Abbie Smith
Neighborhood children living in Stone Bridge Estates
on and at the remaining abutments
17
The following documents were handed
out during the meeting.
4 �jo��k bsk- T P lam .
HISTORIC CONTEXT
Planning for the district is to be accomplished with respect for its prehistoric and historic resources.
The people of the Woodland prehistoric period (500 BC -AD 1000) constructed earthen burial mounds
in this area of Iowa. The State Archeologist's Office has indicated that there are no known prehistoric
or early settler burial mounds in the Northeast District, but has cautioned that there may be unre-
corded burial sites. Two sites of early prehistoric and historic habitations were discovered during a
survey prior to improvements along Rochester Avenue. These sites, shown on Exhibit B: Northeast
Planning District Recorded Archaeological Sites Map, are not considered significant sites in and of
themselves, but may serve as indicators that other archaeological sites exist in the area.
Farmsteads began to be established in this district in.the mid-1800s, and agricultural uses continue to
encompass the northern and eastern portions of the district. In 1976, Irving Weber, a local historian,
cited six "century farms" in Scott Township, which makes up the eastern portion of the district. One of
the "century farms" is the Hunter farm, located on the west edge of the Hunter Heights (NE) quadrant.
The 1912 publication Leading Events in Johnson County History by Gilbert Irish notes that Adam
Hunter arrived in Iowa City and settled in the area around 1850. The Hunter family has lived on and
farmed the land ever since. The Lindemann families, who own land to the south, are descendents of
Adam Hunter. Little has been written about other early settlers or events that may have occurred
within the district, and few remnants from the early settlement remain.
It is known that in 1839, Lyman Dillon plowed a furrow from Iowa City to Dubuque as a guide for
pioneers. The furrow is said to have generally followed the current route of Highway 1, and so is likely
to have traversed the northwest corner of the district, following the ridge top where Dubuque Road
and the ACT entrance are currently located.
According to a long time resident, a portion of a Rock Island railroad spur connected Iowa City with a
small settlement northeast of Iowa City called Digby. This railroad spur generally followed the south
branch of Ralston Creek out from Iowa City through what is now called Scott Park, and cut diagonally
across the Lindemann Hills (SE) quadrant. Although the rail spur has been abandoned and has virtu-
ally disappeared as agricultural uses displaced the line, a remnant of an original stone railroad bridge
over Ralston Creek is still located on the Jerry Lindemann farm near Taft Avenue.
Stone Railroad Bridge
Iowa Citians, Emma and William Haddock.
this once historic site.
A few, older farm homes remain scattered through
the district. A large stucco home once owned by
Henry Peterson is located on Hawks Drive on the
north side of Herbert Hoover Highway. This home
appears to have been built in the mid-1800s and may
warrant historic landmark status. Other older farm
homes in the area may also be considered historic,
and could be preserved within new neighborhoods
as development begins to occur around them. One
such structure known as "Bluffwood" was located
until 1993 on land that is now occupied by the Roch-
ester Hills development. The Gothic style home in a
pastoral setting was the country home of prominent
The Bluffwood Neighborhood Association is named after
The following documents were handed
out during the meeting.
r�Q®'U�tnt�Wc'� ,,c f-Y 6A
Other Plannins Districts:
Scattered historic properties survive in other parts of the community. In some instances, farmsteads
have been incorporated into modern residential subdivisions. A solitary farmhouse or barn may survive
as testimony to a property's earlier use. "Rose Hill," the Irish family residence at 1415 E. Davenport
Street is one such example. Now located along a street of late 20s' century homes near Hickory Hill
Park, the 1849 brick house survives as an example of the Greek Revival Style that typified early Iowa
City housing. The house was listed on the National Register by its owner in 1992 and was designated a
local landmark in 1996. The two measures combine good private and public preservation efforts.
In other cases, scattered historic properties retain their early open -space settings, agricultural use, or
large acreage sites. The James McCollister Farmstead located at 2460 S. Gilbert Street (southeast of the
junction of U.S. 6 and U.S. 218) was among the first properties locally listed on the National Register
when its owner nominated it in 1976. It was designated a local landmark in 1996. The property's 1864
brick house survives as an excellent example of the Italianate Style, its substantial size providing
evidence of the early prosperity of Johnson County's farmers. The McCollister Farmstead is also an
example of a property that is in a location and setting that is likely to see development pressure in the
future. Together, National Register listing and local landmark designation will provide a level of
protection intended to guide changes to the McCollister Farmstead property in the future.
Objective 1: Provisions of the City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance should be retained and administered
to protect scattered historic resources, especially archeological resources, in largely
undeveloped areas of the Northeast, Southeast, South, South Central and North Corridor
Planning Districts.
Objective 2:
should be undertaken. Farmsteads, residences, former schools, churches, commercial
buildings, industrial properties, transportation resources such as bridges and early
roadways, and other historic property types should be evaluated in advance of
development taking place.
Objective 3: When appropriate, the HPC should encourage owners to complete National Register of
Historic Places nominations and local landmark designation. Together, these measures
will provide a minimal level of protection for important historic resources in outlying
areas of the community.
A summary of objectives is provided in the table on the following page. Completed objectives
are represented by the solid • with future objectives shown with an open o symbol. Objectives
with the highest level of importance are designated as "A" priority and should be initiated in the
next two years. "B" priority objectives are of moderate high importance and can be deferred for
two to five years. "C" priority objectives are of lesser importance or require other activities to
be completed before they are initiated. They can be delayed from in five to eight years. "D"
priority objectives are long-term initiatives to be undertaken in eight to ten years.
94
�rOft1 Nana ,rd
r,li�l�l I
The following documents were handed
out during the meeting.
Vvhy Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLab
4CI IT YL A13
www.citylab.com
Thank you for printing content from www.citylab.com. If you enjoy this piece, then please check back soon for
our latest in urban -centric journalism.
With new tools and financing methods, preservationists could save endangered spaces without alienating those who
should share our cause. Here's how we can adapt.
FEB 8, 2019
PATRICE FREY
Historic preserwationist and president of the National
J
Mail Street Center
https9lw..citylab.com/pempectivel20l9/02/tax-credit-historic-preservation-old-town-main-streetl5819891?utm source=newsletter&silverid=%25%25... 1110
20412019 why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLah
One of the great surprises of the digital age is that quality of place remains such a key factor in where
people choose to live and businesses choose to open their doors. Only 10 or 20 years ago, futurists and
technologists promised us that place would become irrelevant: We would all live and work and connect
with the world via the internet, free to roam anywhere we chose. But millions of years of evolution are
tough to shake; we remain social creatures and continue to seek connection, delight, and fulfillment in
real, physical space.
The growing importance of quality places has been a boon for many older commercial districts in U.S.
cities, many of which have suffered from a legacy of disinvestment. At the National Main Street Center,
an independent subsidiary of the National Trust for Historic Preservation where I serve as president and
CEO, we've seen a surge in interest in revitalizing historic downtowns, thanks to the market's new
enthusiasm for flexible and character -rich space, as well as social and demographic forces that favor
these types of districts. Younger Americans prefer urban living and have been migrating downtown in
pursuit of walkable neighborhoods and city- amenities, including older and historic buildings. On paper,
these new young urbanites should be fans of historic preservation. Indeed, research from the National
Trust for Historic Preservation shows that over 90 percent of Millennials express support for
preservation.
Despite this overwhelming appreciation of older buildings, the actual practice and process of
preservation in the U.S. faces enormous challenges. In hot real estate markets, we lose too many
buildings because rapid investment creates conditions that lead to demolition, often as a result of the
false claim that it's the only way to add needed density. As just one example, a forthcoming analysis of
Miami's fast-growing Little Havana neighborhood by the National Trust's Research and Policy Lab finds
the district could easily accommodate 10,000 new residential units and accommodate 550 new
businesses by building out vacant lots and utilizing vacant buildings to a height and scale compatible
with existing structures.
htt ps:l1 www. city la b. co mlpe rspectivel2019102llax-cred it-h i sto ric-pre serva ti on-old-town-main-street/5819891? utm_source=newsletter&s i lverid=%25 %25... 2110
2/14/2019
Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLab
Development pressures imperil the historic fabric of Miami's Little Havana neighborhood, preservationists fear. (Lynne
SladkylAP)
Cold markets have the opposite problem: Valuable historic resources lie fallow because demand for
space is low and the economics of rehabilitation can be extraordinarily challenging. See places like Cairo,.
Illinois, a historic river town facing enormous depopulation. (Painfully, Cairo now finds itself an objg_ct
of fascination for road trippers in search of "ruin porn.")
The preservation movement is also struggling to tell the full American story. Only eight percent of
National Register sites and three percent of our National Historic Landmarks represent people of color,
women, or members of the LGBTQ community.
Both the positive dynamics and the emerging challenges point to the significant ways in which the
preservation landscape has changed in the last 50 years. Yet our toolbox has not evolved to keep pace. In
our work supporting preservation -based revitalization in more than 1,100 communities across the
United States, we at the National Main Street Center see that we're falling short in two specific ways:
Firstly, our core preservation tools do not serve all kinds of preservation well —and in fact can
undermine our broader efforts to save buildings and support the people and enterprises that enliven
those buildings. Secondly, our financing mechanisms for building rehabilitation are inadequate to the
task.
The reputational issue undermines broader work to sav c prices b''
alienating those'si-ho might share common cause with the preservation
movement.
https://www.citylab.com/perspective/2019/02/ta -credit-historic-preservation-old-town-main-street/581989/?utm_source=newsletter&silverid=%25%25... 3/10
2/14f2019 Vdny Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLab
These challenges in the preservation world aren't just a distraction from the other pressing social,
environmental, and economic issues American cities face: Everyone who cares about quality of place and
values our collective story as Americans has a stake in this conversation. So too do those who want to
address the declining economic health of rural America and the lack of economic opportunity in so
many of our urban neighborhoods. Decisions about what to keep, and how, echo for generations. Those
choices shape and reflect our understanding of ourselves as a people, and profoundly impact
opportunities to bring lite and economic prosperity back to struggling communities.
We need to update the preservationist's toolkit
If you work in the preservation field today, you're operating with a set of tools developed in the late
1970s, and has changed little since. Historic preservation work in the united States is guided by the
Secretary of the hlterior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties drafted in 1977. Four sets of
standards guide four distinct treatments: preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction. In
the years since, there have only been modest advancements.
A lot has changed since 1977: We've experienced rapid urbanization, the corresponding decline of rural
areas, vast changes (for good and ill) in real estate financing, the beginning of catastrophic impacts from
climate change, and a long -overdue awakening to the importance of honoring, telling, and preserving all
facets of the American store.
But preservation practice has evolved such that buildings are still categorized in a binary way: Either
they are historically significant, or they are not. That's an increasingly limited way of seeing our many
kinds of historic resources —some more significant than others, and some requiring more careful
conservation than others.
Let's consider three very different examples: a pre -Civil War home, a pioneering office building of the
1930s, and a typical early 20th century commercial structure in just about any American town or city.
https:/lwww.citylab.com/pefspective/2Ol9tO2/tax-credit-historic-preservation-old-town-main-streeY58l989/?uttr source=newsletter&silverid=%25%25.., 410
2/1412019 Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - City Lab
As a National Monument and a National Trust Historic Site, Lincoln's Cottage in Washington, D.C., has been the focus of careful preservation work.
(Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
In the first category there is Lincoln's Cottage in northwest Washington, D.C., a home originally
constructed in 1842 for banker George W. Riggs. During the Civil War, it served as President Abraham
Lincoln's refuge, where he penned the Emancipation Proclamation.
Preservation of fabric is a primary concern in a building so vital in helping tell the American story, so the
National Park Service's Standards and Guidelines for Preservation prioritize that care be given to
"applying measures necessary to sustain the existing, form, integrity and materials' of the subject
property. Because of the thoughtful guidance offered by the Standards, we now have thousands of
extraordinary buildings that have been carefully conserved for generations of future visitors.
Most preservation projects, however, make use of the Standards and Guidelines for Rehabilitation.
which are designed to guide the revitalization of historic buildings in preparation for their reuse. These
offer developers guidance on how to approach repairs and alterations while preserving portions of the
building which are vital to its historic, cultural, or architectural value.
hops:/Iwww.citylab.con-perspectivel2019/O2Aax-credit-historic-preservation-old-lown-main-street/581989/?utm_source=nemle(ler&siIverid=°/ 25°/a25... 5110
2/1412019 Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLab
Take, for example, the Philadelphia Savings Fund Society_(PSFS) building in Philadelphia, built in 1932.
Designed by architects William Lescaze and George Howe and the first International Style skyscraper in
the U.S, the building was a radical departure in design that ushered in an era that would forever change
the American urban landscape. The Rehabilitation Standards helped ensure the conservation of key
features like the original exterior limestone and aluminum -framed windows, beautiful marble features
in the lobby, and the openness of its magnificent banking hall, even as the building was repositioned for
a significantly different use as a hotel
Now known as the Loews Philadelphia Hotel, the PSFS Building retains many of its signature exterior features, though the
interior has peen significantly altered. ch[isinphilly544B via Flickr)
Over time, the Standards and the Guidelines for Rehabilitation have become the default guidance for
regulatory review of a wide range of projects involving historic buildings. While not required to do so,
local preservation officials tend to use Standards for Rehabilitation to guide their own programs, making
them the de facto preservation policy governing preservation nationwide.
But as the Standards have come to be applied to such a diverse array of structures —such as the
thousands of small commercial buildings constructed across the country before 1960—their utility has
been called into question. These buildings may feature beautiful craftsmanship and quality materials
and reflect regional variations on the Main Street commercial building archetype, but they're not
typically considered exceptional individual examples of architecture. Nor are they deemed to be of
exceptional cultural significance.
https:11www.citylab.com/perspective/2019IO2/tax-cred1t-historic-preservation-old-town-main-streel]581981)/?utm_source=newsletter&silverid= % 25 % 25... 0l10
2/14/2019 Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLab
A typical example would be the Heart of Texas Grill in San Augustine, Texas (population 1,800). Like
most of the town's older downtown buildings, it dates to the early 20th century and retains some of its
original characteristics, such as interesting brickwork and some of its original fenestration pattern. But
plenty of similar two-story brick storefronts can be found in small towns nationwide; put simply, it is
not a uniquely significant resource. In this instance, much of this building's value to the community is
tied instead to its use as a popular eatery and its role as a vibrant social hub in a small town that's been
challenged by disinvestment.
Located in downtown San Augustine, Texas, the Heart of Texas Grill occupies a typical early 20th-century brick storefront
building. (Tracy Cox)
Further, the building has been altered to suit the evolving needs of the businesses that have occupied it
over time, including significant changes to the entrance area and upper -story windows. To rehab it in a
historically "correct" way —that is, through the stringent application Standards for Rehabilitation —
would be extraordinarily challenging in a town where building valuations are low, traditional financing
options are scarce, and historic preservation tax credits are not a likely source of financing.
In such instances, the primary goal of preservationists should be to support people and communities in
retaining the places they feel passionately about, and doing so in a way that supports their evolving
needs (and reflects their financial realities). That may —and should —allow for flexibility on preservation
tenets sometimes held sacrosanct, such as the conservation of windows or the preservation of interior
circulation patterns.
https://Ww.citylab.com/perspective]2019/02/tax-credit-historic-preservation-old-town-main-street/581989/?utm_scurce=newsletter&silverid=%25/25... 7/10
2/1412019
Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - Cilyl-ab
How might we re -cast preservation standards to recognize and support a much wider range of places?
The English system of grading buildings offers inspiration. Under this heritage conservation system,
buildings are provided with one of three grades based on differing levels of significance. Since 1947,
historic buildings fall into three categories:
Grade 11 bitildirxgs are of special interest, warranting every effort to preserve them.
Grade II* birildb gs are particularly important buildings of more than special interest.
Grade I btlildb gs—the highest grade —are of exceptional interest.
Just 2.5 percent of buildings are listed as Grade I, while 6 percent are listed as Grade lI*; the remainder —
over 90 percent —are listed as Grade II. Local planning authorities use this system to help guide
decision -making about proposed alterations in a way that balances the site's significance with other
issues, including use and economic viability.
Such an approach would be useful in the U.S., as it would offer a system of gradation that acknowledges
that our historic resources are not monolithic: Different kinds of interventions can be expected for
different kinds of places. This could be transformative for preservation, helping planing and
preservation professionals address the reality that not all buildings enjoy the same level of significance.
In some instances, compromise is appropriate in order to accommodate other important social goods
and economic realities.
And we need new ways to pay for preservation
The Federal Historic Tax Credit program is one of the crowning achievements of the preservation
movement, offering a significant federal incentive to rehabilitate historic buildings. In 2018, a coalition
led by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and the National Trust Community Investment
Corporation successfully defended the credit from proposed elimination in the House version of the
2017 Budget, in which nearly all tax credits were eliminated. The significant outpouring of support from
communities throughout the country that had benefitted from the HTC or that recognized the future
potential for the credits to revitalize their downtowns, resulted in Congress modifying but retaining this
tax incentive as a permanent part of the tax code.
But many of the most -needed rehabilitation projects on Main Street are too small to be good candidates
for Federal Historic Tax Credits, because the transactional costs are too high. (As a general rule of thumb,
projects below $$5 million have a very difficult time using the credit.) Conventional financing for these
projects is equally challenging, given the decline in lending for smaller projects and the unfavorable
economics of rehabilitation in distressed markets.
httpsllwmw.citylab.com/peispective12019i021tax-credit-historic-preservation-old-town-main-streetl5819891?utm_source=newsletter&silverid= %25%25... 8110
211412019
Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLab
Atlanta's Auburn Avenue has struggled to attract investment. Twice the historic neighborhood has been listed on the National
Trust's list of most endangered places. (David Goldman/AP)
Fortunately, the last decade has given rise to new tools that could ease financing of smaller projects.
Several paths offer promise, including the creation of presen7ation-focused social impact funds and
recent changes in securities law that permit crowdfunded real estate projects.
The latter financing mechanism is already gaining traction. For example, Pittsburgh Developer Eve
Picker founded a company, Small Change through which anybody can invest in neighborhood real
estate projects that have a strong social purpose. Her work is a powerful example of how evolutions in
securities laws can offer new financing mechanisms for real estate.
A new federal program, Opportunity Zones also offers promise for preservationists. This program
incentivizes investors to invest capital into distressed neighborhoods, marry of which feature an
abundance of older and historic buildings. Authorized by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Opportunity
Zones may also create challenges for historic resource conservation, as the program does not have
specific provisions to incentivize historic preservation or discourage demolition of historic properties.
What's the path ahead?
Being an effective preservationist means understanding that our efforts to save buildings are woven into
a complex tapestry of other important social needs, including —but not limited to —affordable housing,
economic and social equity, economic development, and climate change. Insisting on an
uncompromising approach to heritage conservation —particularly in instances in which the building in
question is not a resource of singular historic value —makes it very easy to cast preservationists as
unreasonable and out of touch.
https://www.citylab.com/perspective/2019/02/tax-credit-historic-preservation-old-town-main-streetf58l989/?utm_source=newsletter&s1lverid=°/ 25%25,,. 910
2/14/2019 Why Historic Preservation Needs a New Approach - CityLab
That reputational issue undermines broader work to save places by alienating those who might share
common cause with the preservation movement. Some local preservation commissions, for example,
have prohibited the use of solar panels or required that they be placed on a building in a way that
minimizes their visibility, even at the cost of reducing the efficiency of the panels. In other instances,
Federal Historic Tax Credit projects have been required to make accommodations to conserve interior
features that negatively impact the quality and utility of space for love- and moderate -income residents.
Similarlv, in Main Street projects, we can easily appear tone deaf when we insist on a purist approach to
preservation that neither recognizes the way Main Street -style resources can differ from other historic
resources, nor acknowledges exceptionally challenging economic circumstances. In these instances, we
easily lose allies who might otherwise support preservation.
What then is the path forward? As people who care about the built environment —and more importantly
the people in it —let's resolve in 2019 to launch a multi -disciplinary dialogue on the future of older
buildings. This conversation must extend beyond traditional preservationists and include those in
finance, affordable housing, community development, sustainability, and other fields. Let's consider
new opportunities for impact, confront uncomfortable truths about where we may be falling short, and
be vigilant in our efforts to find and embrace creative new tools for preservation. The future of historic
places may well depend upon it.
https.//w .citylab.com/perspective/2019/02/tax-credit-historic-preservation-old-town-main-streeU581989/?utm_source=newsletter&silverid= 25%2... 10110