HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-02-04 Bd Comm minutesMINUTES FINAL/APPROVEI
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2002 -6:30 PM
CIVIC CENTER-LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
Members Present: Jerry Anthony, Lori Bears, Amy Correia, Mark Edwards,
Matthew Hayek, Rick House, Jayne Sandier
Members Absent: Morgan Hoosman, John Deeth
City Council Members Present: None
Staff Present: Tracy Hightshoe, Stephen Long
Others Present: Jesse Burns
Call to Order
Amy Correia called meeting to order at 6:30 PM.
Approval Of The November 21, 2002 Minutes
Motion: Bears moved that the minutes of November 21, 2002 be approved as submitted.
Hayek seconded the motion. All in favor, motion passed 6-0. (Sandier not yet present)
Public/Member Discussion of Items Not on the Agenda
None
Monitoring Reports
Hannah's Blessing - Daycare Expansion (Hoosman) - Hoosman not present. Staff reported that
the project is scheduled to open February 1, 2003. There is a minor shortage of funds. The
bank will secure a loan for the needed $10,000 of remaining repairs when a business plan is
completed. All that is left to do is interior carpet installation and construction of a backyard
fence. Neighbors got together and built a retaining wall. A director has been hired and they are
maintaining a waiting list for the daycare.
EHP- Shelter Coordinator (Deeth) - Deeth not present. Staff reported that funds were used for
the Shelter Coordinator position to provide case management, intake and referral for homeless
and near homeless persons and families. EHP has been spending the award in equal monthly
installments. EHP will change their name effective January 1, 2003 to the Iowa City Shelter
House. All committee members will also be on the mailing list for their biannual newsletter.
City of Iowa City-Housing Rehabilitation (Edwards) - No information on housing rehab but is
reporting information on the Neighborhood Center at Broadway. The landscaping project is
done; it looks great and corrected an erosion issue. They also removed a fence that had been a
safety concern with neighbors and police. A new chain link fence will be constructed and new
playground equipment will be installed.
Garden Prairie LP-Affordable Rental Units (Correia) - Correia reported they have closed on
enough lots for14 units, and all but $20,000 to $ 25,000 has been spent. There is an application
in for State Home Funds and Low Income Housing Tax credits; there will be more information in
March.
Greater Iowa City Housing Fellowship- FY02 Affordable Rental Units (Anthony) - Anthony
provided information regarding FY02 & 03 projects. Commission members had questions
regarding GICHF's current projects. Requested an update on all funds unexpended. Members
2
requested information on Longfellow Manor and the use of FY02 and FY04 funds and how that
affects prior awards.
Correia handed out a memo concerning Housing Criteria for CDBG/HQME funded Projects from
Steve Nasby and also a memo from City Manager for information regarding staff's intention to
apply for CDBG Funding for code enforcement for FY04. A memo by Council Member Kanner
concerning code enforcement was also handed out.
Sandier Arrives.
OLD BUSINESS
Recaptured Funds Policy
Correia opened informal discussion of the draft policy. There was discussion among all
committee members concerning several variables. Commission members did not want to single
out LIHTC applicants from other projects who rely on outside sources of funding to make their
projects viable. Members recommended that all projects that rely on other required sources of
funding be treated equally under this new policy.
As CDBG funds must be spent on a timely basis (less than a year for many projects), but HOME
allows a five year period before funds must be spent, the commission recommended having two
separate requirements. This would recognize the complexities involved in housing construction.
The commission also discussed how many times an applicant can apply for required, other
sources of funds before the recapture of local funds. The Commission decided that they did not
want to automatically recapture funds if the first round of outside funding failed. Will discuss this
matter at the next meeting. Commission members wanted the flexibility of evaluating the project
and determining if the project's success would be greater in the next subsequent funding round
before automatic recapture.
Correia asked Hightshoe to take the committee's thoughts and comments and bring a revised
policy back in January for review.
Correia had a question about the City Manager's memo. The 10% increase in the number of
rental units from 1990 to 2000, is there a breakdown of what the rental units rent for? I.e.: what
is the percentage of those that rent for fair market rate? Hightshoe didn't believe the City had
this information.
Hayek questioned the proposed $4.00 inspection fee; what is the current fee and how large is
the Housing Inspection Office currenUy? 4 employees currently staff the office. He noted the
amount doesn't seem that large except when it is applied to large property owners.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: House moved to adjourn meeting. Edwards seconded motion. Motion passed 7-0.
Meeting adjourned at 7:45PM.
S hared\pcd\minut es~hcdc\ 12-19-02.doc
FI'NAL/APPROVE
MINUTES
IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
CIVIC CENTER, LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
JANUARY 8, 2003
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Kennedy, Lyra Dickerson, Jim Anderlik
STAFF PRESENT: Sylvia Mejia, Karen Jennings, Sarah Holecek, Fire Chief Andy
Rocca, Fire Lieutenant Bob Henry
OTHERS PRESENT: Crystal Usher, Chris Lacy
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY MANAGER AND STAFF: None.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CITY COUNCIL: None.
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
Chairperson Kennedy called the meeting to order at 8:15AM. First item of business was setting
the time and place for the hearing of Chris Lacy's appeal. Mejia noted that there were
limitations in the Iowa Code as to the allowable time frame for setting the appeal hearing. It was
further noted that there were issues with Ms. Usher's availability during the timeframe mandated
by code. Mejia explained that two potential solutions to the availability problem were to either
meet within the specified timeframe to open the hearing and then continue it to a date that
would be agreeable to both parties or that the timeframe set by the code be waived and the
hearing be set for a time mutually agreeable to both parties. Lacy agreed to waive the
timeframe established in the code and did so in writing to the commission. Kennedy indicated
that waiving the timeframe in writing was acceptable to the Commission. The appeal hearing
was scheduled for Thursday, March 6 and Friday, March 7, 2003 starting at 8:30 AM both days
in Emma J. Harvat Hall in the Iowa City Civic Center.
The second item of business was the process for the issuance of subpoenas by the
Commission. Dickerson moved that Kennedy be authorized to sign any requests for subpoenas
for witnesses for the hearing. Anderlik seconded and all were in favor. Kennedy instructed that
requests for subpoenas be faxed to his office where he would sign them and return them to the
appropriate person via fax or his courier.
Next item of business was the sequestering of witnesses. Kennedy indicated that his
preference would be that witnesses be sequestered until called to testify. Dickerson moved that
all witnesses with the exception of Chief Rocca and Chris Lacy be sequestered until called to
testify. Kennedy seconded and all were in favor.
Mejia requested that the Commission authorize the use of a coud reporter during the
proceedings. Kennedy authorized this with concurrence from other commissioners.
The next item of business was determining whether or not the Commission preferred to be
represented by independent legal counsel. Holecek explained that Chapter 400 of the Iowa
Code states that the City Attorney shall act as counsel for the Commission. However, her
involvement with the disciplinary issue from its early stages placed her in conflict with
representing the Commission. She, therefore, recommended that the Commission direct her to
present the case to them and seek independent counsel if they desired legal representation.
Kennedy explained that outside counsel has not been used in previous proceedings and
Dickerson noted that the Commission has relied on Kennedy's knowledge and expertise in the
past and been very comfortable doing so. Kennedy moved that the City Attorney's office
present the case to the commission through Ms. Holecek and that the Commission not retain
independent legal counsel to represent them in this matter. Dickerson seconded and all were in
favor.
Usher requested that she and Lacy have the opportunity to review and select documents to be
copied from Mr. Lacy's personnel file, that she be allowed to speak with Fire department
personnel, that she be provided copies of any police reports and the videotapes of the police
interviews. Rocca indicated that she would be allowed access to fire department personnel,
and Holecek agreed to provide a copy of the videotaped interviews and any formal police
reports. Mejia stated Mr. Lacy and/or Ms. Usher can stop in the Personnel office at their
convenience to identify which documents they would like from Mr. Lacy's personnel file.
Kennedy indicated that both parties would be given the opportunity to present opening and
closing arguments at the hearing. He further explained that the proceedings would be relatively
informal and that hearsay objections would be noted but that such testimony would be allowed.
He also requested that exhibits be marked in advance and that copies be provided for each
commissioner in notebook form.
Mejia asked for clarification as to whether or not she was to be sequestered as a witness
because she also serves as staff to the Commission and has been present in past proceedings
to tend to any of their needs. Usher indicated that neither she nor Lacy had an objection to
Mejia being present during the entire proceeding.
Old Business:
None
New Business:
Mejia notified the Commission that the Police Officer certified list is down to 4 people so the City
will be considering a possible recruitment. She also indicated that there are ongoing internal
discussions regarding the necessity of conducting promotional testing in the Fire department so
the City may be coming to the Commission with a recommendation in the near future.
Dickerson moved and Anderlik seconded a motion to adjourn. All were in favor and meeting
was adjourned at 8:43AM.
( Iowa .C. ity..
Pubhc Library
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING - 2nd FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
THURSDAY, December 19, 2002
5:00 PM
Members Present: Linda Dellsperger, Shaner MagalhSes, Lisa Parker, Linda Prybil, Pat Schnack,
Jesse Singerman, Tom Suter, Jim Swaim, David VanDusseldorp
Staff Present: Barbara Black, Maeve Clark, Susan Craig, Barbara Curtin, Debb Green, Heidi
Lauritzen, Kara Logsden, Martha Lubaroff, Liz Nichols,
Others: Joel Miller, Building Project Coordinator
CALL TO ORDER:
Meeting was called to order at 5:00 pm
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
None
APPROVAL OF MiNUTES:
The minutes of the regular Board meeting of November 21 were approved unanimously after a motion
by Magalh~es/Dellsperger.
UNFiNISHED BUSINESS
Building Project. Miller reviewed changes that have necessitated some adjustment to the price. Work
continues to move along about four to eight weeks ahead of schedule. We will shut down April 16 in
order to move to the west wing. On the west end, the construction fence and scaffolding has been taken
down, showing the brick and windows and opening up the plaza. Miller anticipates that interior painting
and second floor dry walling will start after the first of the year. A brief tour was taken.
Leased Space: Magalh~es informed Board prior to the discussion that he is considering opening a
business and may be interested in leasing retail space in the library building. Therefore, upon advice of
the City attorney he recused himself from the discussion.
The committee appointed by Parker met and prepared preliminary notes, which were included in the
packet. Parker asked for feedback from the Board on the draft outline. The committee recommends a
public meeting in January so that the entire process is open. It was suggested to incorporate it as part of
the Board meeting and hold it in Room A. It will be announced to the public via a press release and on
our Web site. It will also appear in the Chamber of Commerce newsletter. A letter will also be sent to
people who have inquired. The consensus of the Board was to start the public meeting at 5:00 pm, with
the distribution of a more formal handout containing our criteria. The purpose of the public meeting is
Board of Trustees
Page 2
to let people know what the parameters being considered are and welcome input. We have no figures
available yet for rent. In response to a question, there will be two separate entrances; one for the public
retail and one for the library providing a secure access. Dellsperger had some concerns about the
statement from the committee that indicated businesses best suited would be compatible with the library.
She was concerned that we were not so exclusive as to rule out general retail businesses. Swaim thought
the language was not exclusive only alerting people that all things being equal, there might be a
preference for businesses that would be compatible with the library. Parker explained that a compatible
business could create a synergy that would result in more traffic for the business and library.
Swaim liked the last two statements of the draft, which spoke to approving signage and negotiating a
lower rate for the rental of more space. In response to a question, Craig explained that she had met with
City finance people who are aware that the income raised by this property will go towards the library
bonds minus property management fees. Suter is researching lease rates.
Swaim reminded the Board that since Magalh~es had recused himself from the discussion, the Board
should not comment regarding any interest he may have. We need to follow appropriate procedures. As
applications come in, Parker envisions the committee reviewing them and then making recommendations.
These guidelines need to be run by the City Attorney before our January meeting. Craig recommends
treating the meeting as a special meeting for public input followed by the regular Board meeting.
County Funding: Magalh~es, Schnack and Parker met with the State legislators at the annual reception.
Afterwards, Library Directors and Board member representatives stayed to talk about county funding.
Parker spoke to the group about some of the things that our Board has discussed. It was helpful to get
the group together. Craig felt that by the end of the meeting, all decided to stay the course until the
County publishes budget figures that show library funding. She has been told that they would be having
budget meetings in January and will keep everyone informed.
Dellsperger asked what the sense of the trustees from other libraries was? Craig thinks that there has to
be something to react too and at this point there is not anything on the table. Until we know what the
county will do it seems worthwhile to continue education without forcing the issue. We will wait until
we get more information.
The City's budget should be published soon. Craig believes that the City Manager has included all of our
requests in his recommendation to the Council.
NEW BUSINESS
Friends Foundation Bylaws: Curtin wrote a summary that was included in the packet. Singerman said
that as she read the revisions she did not see any real changes between the Friends Foundation Board's
and the Library Board's fundamental relationship. Curtin replied that the language was changed in an
effort to clarify previously confusing language. The relationship remains the same. Magalh~es moved
approval and Suter seconded. Some changes to the Foundation's Bylaws require approval from the
Library Board. Library Board must approve these changes before they move on to the Foundation Board.
A copy of the complete document with all changes was included for the information. Other changes had
to be approved by The Book End committee; like changing their name from the Friends Committee to
reflect what they actually do. There was some additional language in The Book End section to reflect the
Foundation Board approving their budget. There is a statement in Article 3 about the Development
Office, which previously had never been included. A vote was called for. Seven trustees voted approval,
Board of Trustees
Page 3
Swaim opposed and Dellsperger abstained. Curtin verified that ICPL Board votes only on Article 3 and
4. The Foundation Board votes on the entire document.
Gift Money: Spelling Bee. Curtin included a request to the Board for $300 to sponsor a team for the
2003 Iowa City Spells event. Singerman moved approval. Magalhaes seconded. All were in favor.
STAFF REPORTS
Children's Room, Systems, and Technical Services reports were included this month. Children's Room
remains busy. In response to a question, Green said she thought Popo's Puppet Festival had been going
on for about 17 or 18 years.
Dellsperger had a question about purging items. Green responded that in the case of item purge, it tends
to be an item that has not been circulating for some reason. Often, purged items can be used in deposit
collections. If not they are made available at The Book End, offered on the free shelf, or discarded.
A question was asked about tagging and whether the system would allow us to know how long it has been
since an item was checked out. Black explained that the checkpoint data feeds into the library system and
use reports are run from the Innovative database.
Tagging will not be complete until we move back into this building. Two hundred thirty thousand items
have to be done. We are ahead of schedule with thirty six thousand items done and fifteen months to go.
Development Office report: The Annual Fund has gone down in the last three years, possibly as a result
of the poor economy. The capital campaign could also be a factor. Curtin added that an additional $3500
had come in since she wrote the report.
Hal Penick demonstrated our new web page, which debuted on December 2. The original web page had
grown over six years to the point that it was too crowded. Systems team cleaned it up so that one can
navigate easily without having to repeatedly back up. He pointed out the programs and events feature
by taking us to a new calendar program called Web events. This is the basis for what we will offer people
eventually, to book meetings and reserve equipment on-line. He showed the new Kids page and the
ability to click on a book list, find a title and get taken right to the catalog. The new software that AV
purchased to run The Channel enables systems staff to get the channel information on the web site taking
much less time. Board thanked Penick.
Black demonstrated the catalog, showing a new feature that includes images of the art purchase
prizewinners. You can link from the catalog record to a picture of the art itself. It is possible to view a
thumbnail of the entire collection of art to go. It is a very nice feature.
Task Analysis: Nichols included a summary of the study we did in September. There were no major
surprises, however it is a benchmark and will be helpful in planning. It needed to be done prior to the
move to the new building in order to help plan for re-organization.
ANNOUNCEMENT FROM MEMBERS
Dellsperger recommended alerting people now about the closing of the library for two weeks. School
Media librarians especially need to know since it may affect projects for students.
Board of Trustees
Page 4
Magalh~es reported on his attendance at Inservice Day. He liked the ICPL song. Commented that the
discussion of the disenfranchised was very interesting.
PRESIDENT'S REPORT
Parker reported that the city committee studying issues of the homeless is working on a position paper.
Wesley House will probably prepare a proposal that will circulate. What the group has decided to focus
on is the large number of people who are hanging out in the morning until free lunch and how that is
impacting Wesley House as well as the library. The concept paper will elicit other ideas.
VanDusseldorp reminded people about year-end contributions to the ICPL. MagalhSes suggested
businesses forming teams for ICPL Spells.
COMMUNICATIONS
None
DISBURSEMENTS
Since the disbursements had been distributed at the meeting, it was decided that they would be included
in next month's packet and approved along with Disbursements for December. In the future, if meetings
are scheduled earlier in the month, and disbursements aren't ready to include in the packet, they will go
out with the next month's packet.
ADJOURNMENT:
Meeting was adjourned at 6:40 pm
Minutes taken and transcribed by
Martha Lubaroff
MINUTES Approved
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 19, 2002
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Beth Koppes, Jerry Hansen, Don Anciaux, Ann Bovbjerg, Dean Shannon,
Benjamin Chait, Ann Freerks
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Miklo, Mitch Behr
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
Recommended approval, by a vote of 7-0, VAC02-00008, a city-initiated application to vacate
approximately 3.62-acres of portions of Madison Street, Davenport Street and Bloomington Street rights-
of-way adjacent to the old Iowa City Water Plant site.
CALL TO ORDER:
Bovbjerg called the meeting to order at 7:33 pm.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF VACANCIES ON CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS:
Bovbjerg said a listing of the current vacancies on the various City boards and commissions was posted
in the outer lobby.
VACATION ITEM:
VAC02-00008, discussion of a city-initiated application to vacate portions of Madison Street, Davenport
Street and Bloomington Street rights-of-way adjacent to the old Iowa City Water Plant site.
Miklo said some streets had been vacated a number of years ago to accommodate the University's plan
to make the area more pedestrian friendly. The City's old water plant was located in that vicinity. At
present with the City's new water plant ready to open, that area was no longer needed for City purposes.
One of the agreements that had been reached by the City Council with the University a few years ago
was that when the old water plant was no longer needed, the City would sell the property to the
University. The agreement also had anticipated the vacation of these streets given that the only property
that they served was the University, other than the City's old water plant. Now that the water plant would
become University property there was no further need for these streets or for the City to continue to
maintain them and assume liability for them. Therefore Staff proposed that the street be vacated at this
time.
Behr said when the City had been looking to acquire land for Tower Place and parking, one of the
properties was where the former Eastlawn Building had been located. In connection with the acquisition
of that, the City had agreed to negotiate and work out the sale of the old water plant site. The Eastlawn
transaction had taken place a few years ago. Over time, the City and the University had negotiated an
agreement for the University to purchase the property including the right-of-ways that were being
proposed to be vacated. Behr said all that was before the Commission was a vacation. However, there
had been two acquisitions involved, the City acquiring the property upon which the Eastlawn building had
been located and the University acquiring the old water plant site.
Hansen asked if there was a written agreement that this property would be vacated? Behr said there was
a written contract that Council had approved that said the City would sell this property including the right-
of-ways to the University. A contingency in the agreement said, "Upon vacation of the right-of-way within
the area". The contract had been signed, but before the deal could be completed, the vacation had to
Occur.
in response to a request for a clarification by Bovbjerg, Behr said there was a written contract approved
by City Council for the transaction. The transaction had not been completed yet as the vacation was one
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
December 19, 2002
Page 2
of the steps that had to be done to complete the transaction. Other steps included the City's keeping quite
a number of utility easements which were all included in the contract.
Bovbjerg asked about what kind of access to the river was available. Behr said it depended on who
owned the land. At present, the University owned the river front property for the most part. There was a
small piece that the City still owned that was river front property that had a water plant building on it. Behr
and Miklo said other than that small triangular piece of property, the University owned both sides of the
river front property. Miklo said the River Corridor Trail is a public trail that runs along the river in that
location between the two pedestrian bridges.
Public discussion was not opened as no persons from the public were present.
Motion: Anciaux made a motion to approve VAC02-00008, a city-initiated application to vacate
approximately 3.62-acres of portions of Madison Street, Davenport Street and Bloomington Street rights-
of-way adjacent to the old Iowa City Water Plant site. Shannon seconded the motion.
The motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Setting of a public hearing for January 16, 2003, to consider amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to
include the updated Arterial Street Plan.
Miklo said the hearing would be for a number of amendments to the Arterial Street Plan. The Commission
had already seen, in some fashion, the amendments that would affect Iowa City, such as the South
Arterial that went through the South District. Also, Scott Boulevard, First Avenue and Oakdale Boulevard
- a proposal north of Interstate 80. There were also several arterial streets outside of Iowa City such as in
Coralville and in the County that were part of the Aderial Street Plan. Staff was requesting the
Commission to Arterial Street Plan as part of the Comprehensive Plan.
Motion: Freerks made a motion setting a public hearing for January 16, 2003, to consider amendments to
the Comprehensive Plan to include the updated Arterial Street Plan. Hansen seconded the motion.
The motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
OTHER:
Miklo said he had passed out a letter to the Commissioners from a County resident that asked for the City
to participate in some of the North Corridor planning. Miklo said the County Board of Supervisors would
need to make an invitation for that to occur. The letter was addressed to the County Board of Supervisors
with copies to the Commission.
Hansen asked where did the Commission's motion for a study of the sand prairie stand? Miklo said the
Commission had asked for investigation to determine whether or not there was a prairie remnant located
on the property east of Gilbert Street. Staff had contacted three plant biologists to do a study. All three
proposals for a study indicated that access to the property over the course of a growing season would be
necessary. Staff had approached Southgate Development about getting the needed access, and it was
denied. Miklo said at the same time, Southgate had been working with Randall Arendt on a plan which
Southgate said would conserve a substantial portion of what might be the prairie. The City would not be
able to take any further action until Southgate actually submitted some sort of application. Bovbjerg said
there had been a neighborhood meeting on that subject earlier in the evening on the latest view of the
development which had been similar to the others with a few changes. She said they were looking to get
it ready for the City to review in late January or February.
Bovbjerg said the 2003 American Association Planning Meeting would be held in Denver. Commissioners
should start thinking about if they wished to attend. Miklo said the City would be able to send one
Commissioner. No one had attended last year. Miklo said Hansen, Koppes, Anciaux and Freerks had not
attended a conference yet. Generally the newest member had been sent, but in past years the newest
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
December 19, 2002
Page 3
member had not been able to attend. Bovbjerg said to give it some consideration or perhaps it would be
possible to spread the money to send two persons.
CONSIDERATION OF THE DECEMBER 5, 2002 MEETING MINUTES:
Motion: Hansen made a motion to approve the meeting minutes as printed and corrected. Koppes
seconded the motion.
The motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
ADJOURNMENT:
Anciaux made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:45 pm. Freerks seconded the motion.
The motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
Jerry Hansen, Secretary
Minutes submitted by Candy Barnhill
shared on cit yn~Jpcd/mir~ut e s/p&~Jp&z 12-19-0 2.d oc
FINAl/APPROVED
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES - December 10, 2002
CALL TO ORDER Chair John Stratton called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ATTENDANCE Board members present: John Watson, John Stratton, Loren Horton and Bill
Hoeft; Board member absent: Bev Smith. Legal Counsel Catherine Pugh (7:03
p.m.) and Staff Kellie Tuttle present. Also in attendance was Captain Tom
Widmer of the ICPD.
CONSENT
CALENDAR Motion by Hoeft and seconded by Horton to adopt the consent calendar.
· Minutes of the meeting on 11/12/02
· ICPD Use of Force Report- October 2002
· ICPD Monthly Liquor License (Off Premise Sales) Report - October 2002
· ICPD General Order #89-04. Civil Rights)
· ICPD General Order #95-01 Emergency Operation of Police Vehicles)
· ICPD General Order #99-02 Alarm-Open Door Response)
· ICPD General Order #99-03 Prisoner Transport)
· ICPD General Order #00-02 Harassment and Sexual Harassment)
· ICPD General Order #01-05 Officer Involved Shootings/Lethal Incident
Investigations)
Motion carried, 4/0, Smith absent.
Watson commented that the Use of Force Report was longer than usual.
Captain Widmer said that he would compare the report to last year's report.
Watson asked if there was anything significant in any of the General Order
changes. Captain Widmer said that there is nothing significant. Captain Widmer
had all the changes highlighted in the reports that were viewed last time and
those in the PCRB's current packet available for the Board to review.
Stratton noted the Monthly Off Premise Sales Report. He thought that these
businesses seemed to be more effective than the bars in the control of alcohol
sales to minors.
OLD BUSINESS No old business.
NEW BUSINESS Hoeft publicly congratulated the ICPD on their fine police work on the bank
robbery.
Hoeft wanted to discuss the procedure of the City Council possibly filing a PCRB
complaint. Pugh stated that the City Manager, the Police Chief, the City Council
or the Board itself may file a PCRB complaint based on reasonable belief that
police misconduct has occurred regardless of personal knowledge. Stratton said
he didn't think the Council would file a complaint even if there were interest until
after the civil action had been dealt with. He also thought that Mr. Kanner's
concern was more with police procedure than with excessive force, per se. (See
further discussion later).
BOARD
INFORMATION Watson had a call from a DI reporter regarding the incident that Mr. Kanner
wanted the Board to review. Watson didn't have any information for the reporter
as he didn't think that the complaint had been referred to the Board. Horton and
Stratton also had received calls from the DI reporter, however, neither actually
spoke to the reporter.
Stratton also had a call last week from a man from Mexico, Missouri who is
interested in creating a police review board there and wanted discuss the
constraints that the Iowa City PCRB operate under. The man also wanted to
know the appeal procedure for a Board decision. Stratton informed him that
there is no appeal. The Board's decision is referred to the City Council who
reacts to it one way or another. It appears that the Mexico City Council wants
the City Attorney to represent the Council and have Council do the mediation
instead of having an independent board. The man also mentioned a report that
the Board might be interested in, "Revisiting Who is Guarding the Guardians"
published by the Federal Civil Service. The report can be found at:
www.usccr, qov/pu bs/,quard/main.htm.
Horton mentioned having conversations with three people who were misinformed
about what the PCRB can and cannot do. Horton is concerned about educating
the public. Stratton suggested that the next time they get a phone call from a
reporter that they should suggest the reporter write a story about what the PRCB
can and cannot do.
Hoett inquired whether there was information on the City web site regarding
PCRB. Tuttle informed the Board that the Staff is in the process of putting the
PCRB brochure and the complaint form on the City's web site.
STAFF
INFORMATION None.
PUBLIC
DISCUSSION Captain Widmer gave the General Order reports with the highlighted changes to
Watson to review. He informed the Board that every report is reviewed either
every year or every other year. Captain Widmer stated that he would no longer
be attending the PCRB meetings. He is changing positions January 4th and will
be the Captain of Operations. Captain Matt Johnson will be taking over Captain
Widmer's duties as Administration and will take his place in attending the PCRB
meetings.
NEW BUSINESS
(cont.) Horton moved that the Board approve the Chief's request for a 15-day extension
for 02-01. Hoett seconded the motion. Motion carried 4/0, Smith absent.
2
MEETING SCHEDULE
· January 14, 2003, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
· February 11,2003, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
· March 11,2003, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
· April 8, 2003, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
Horton will not be at the January 14, 2003 meeting or the February 11,2003
meeting.
ADJOURNMENT Motion for adjournment by Hoeft and seconded by Horton. Motion carried, 4/0,
Smith absent. Meeting adjourned at 7:29.
FINAL/APPROVED
POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD ~
MINUTES - December 20, 2002
CALL TO ORDER Chair John Stratton called the meeting to order at 1:16 P.M.
ATTENDANCE Board members present: Loren Horton, John Stratton and John Watson; Board
members absent: Bill Hoeff, Bev Smith. Staff Kellie Tuttle.
CONSIDER A MOTION GRANTING POLICE CHIEF AN EXTENSION FOR PCRB COMPLAINT
#02-01
Motion by Horton and seconded by Watson to grant the Police Chief an
extension on PCRB Complaint #02-01 to January 17, 2003.
Motion carried, 3/0, Hoeft and Smith absent
CONSIDER A MOTION GRANTING POLICE CHIEF AN EXTENSION FOR PCRB COMPLAINT
#02-02
Motion by Watson and seconded by Horton to grant the Police Chief an
extension on PCRB Complaint #02-02 to February 3, 2003.
Motion carried, 3/0, Hoeft and Smith absent
BOARD INFORMATION
Horton mentioned that he could possibly be at the January meeting if a quorum is
questionable. He will be leaving town the week of the 27th of January and
returning the week of March 3rd.
The Board also discussed the meeting schedule in conjunction with the deadline
dates of the Chief's reports. The Board rescheduled the meeting of January 14th
to January 21Stand did not change the February meeting on the 11th.
STAFF INFORMATION
Turtle questioned the procedure the Board wanted to follow regarding extension
requests. It was confirmed that the Board would like Staff to contact the Chair or
Vice-Chair when a request is filed and the next board meeting is more than a
week away. The Chair or Vice-Chair will decide whether or not a special meeting
is necessary.
MEETING SCHEDULE
· January 21,2003, 7:00 P.M., City Attorney Conference Room
· February 11,2003, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
· March 11,2003, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
· April 8, 2003, 7:00 P.M., Lobby Conference Room
ADJOURNMENT Motion for adjournment by Horton and seconded by Watson
Motion carried, 3/0, Hoeft and Smith absent.
Meeting adjourned at 1:28 P.M.