Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-06-20 Info Packet
I t i IP ALIN CITY O IOWA CITY www.icgov.org I P2. I P3. I P4. IP5. I P6. I P7. City Council Information Packet June 20, 2019 Council Tentative Meeting Schedule Miscellaneous Email from Council member Thomas: Vancouver CA's Climate Action Response to the Climate Crisis Memo from City Manager: Trap Neuter Return Community Cats/Pet Shops and Puppies Memo from City Attorney: Legal authority to require rent disclosure Draft Minutes Airport Commission: May 16 Board of Adjustment: May 8 Senior Center Commission: May 16 June 20, 2019 City of Iowa City Page 1 Item Number: 1. jr ;;rw®J� CITY OC IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 20, 2019 Council Tentative Meeting Schedule ATTACHMENTS: Description Council Tentative Meeting Schedule I b 1 City Council Tentative Meeting Schedule r Subject to change CITY OF IOWA CITY June 20, 2019 Date Time Meeting Location Tuesday, July 2, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Monday, July 15, 2019 4:00 PM Reception City of Coralville 4:30 PM Joint Entities Meeting TBA Tuesday, July 16, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Wednesday, July 24, 2019 5:00 PM Joint meeting with Planning & Zoning Emma J. Harvat Hall Tuesday, August 6, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, August 20, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, September 3, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, September 17, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, October 1, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, October 15, 2019 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Item Number: 2. CITY OC IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 20, 2019 Email from Council member Thomas: Vancouver CA's Climate Action Response to the Climate Crisis ATTACHMENTS: Description Email from Council member Thomas: Vancouver CA's Climate Action Response to the Climate Crisis Kellie Fruehling From: John Thomas Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 1:46 PM To: Jim Throgmorton; Pauline Taylor, Bruce Teague; Mazahir Salih; Susan Mims; Rockne Cole Cc: Geoff Fruin; Kellie Fruehling Subject: Vancouver CA's Climate Action Response to the Climate Crisis Fellow Council members, In advance of our July 2nd Work Session when we discuss climate action, I thought you would find Vancouver, Canada's Climate Action Response helpful, as it provides an example of one city's response, following the declaration of a climate emergency. In January 2019, Vancouver City Council unanimously approved a motion recognizing the climate emergency the planet faces. On April 29, 2019, the Council approved the Climate Emergency Response. Here is the link to the Climate Emergency Response document: https:Hcouncil.vancouver.ca/20190424/documents/cfscl.pdf For context, here is the link to the "Green Vancouver" home page, highlighting the Climate Emergency Response: https://vancouver.ca/green-vancouver/climate-emergencV-response.aspx John John Thomas City Council - District C CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: April 16, 2019 Contact: Matt Horne Contact No.: 604.673.8331 RTS No.: 12978 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: April 24, 2019 TO: Standing Committee on City Finance and Services FROM: General Manager of Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability and General Manager of Engineering Services SUBJECT: Climate Emergency Response RECOMMENDATIONS A. THAT Council adopt a new City-wide long-term climate target of being carbon neutral before 2050 as a complement to the target of 100 per cent of the energy used in Vancouver coming from renewable sources before 2050. B. THAT Council adopt the target that by 2030, 90 per cent of people live within an easy walk/roll of their daily needs, and direct staff to report back by Fall 2020 with a strategy to achieve the target ("Big Move #1 "). C. THAT Council accelerate the existing sustainable transportation target by 10 years, so that by 2030, two thirds of trips in Vancouver will be by active transportation and transit, and direct staff to report back by Fall 2020 with a strategy to achieve the target ("Big Move #2"). D. THAT Council adopt the target that by 2030, 50 per cent of the kilometres driven on Vancouver's roads will be by zero emissions vehicles, and direct staff to report back by Fall 2020 with a strategy to achieve the target ("Big Move #3"). E. THAT Council adopt the new target that by 2025, all new and replacement heating and hot water systems will be zero emissions, and direct staff to report back by Fall 2020 with a strategy to achieve the target ( "Big Move #4"). F. THAT Council adopt the target that by 2030, the embodied emissions in new buildings and construction projects will be reduced by 40 per cent compared to a 2018 baseline, and direct staff to report back by Fall 2020 with initial actions to achieve this target including recommendations to remove regulatory barriers to Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 mass timber construction and initial requirements for embodied emissions reductions ("Big Move #5"). G. THAT Council adopt the target that by 2030, restoration work will be completed on enough forest and coastal ecosystems in Vancouver and the surrounding region to remove one million tonnes of carbon pollution annually by 2060, and direct staff to report back by Fall 2020 with initial actions to achieve the target, including potential partnership opportunities ("Big Move #6"). H. THAT Council direct staff to begin implementing the Accelerated Actions as described in Appendix A and report back to Council with an overall progress report by May 2020. THAT Council direct staff to proceed with the development of a carbon budgeting and accountability framework for corporate and city-wide carbon pollution that meets the objectives described in this report. THAT Council direct staff to proceed with the formation of the Climate and Equity Working Group according to the objectives, process, timelines, participants and budget described in this report. K. THAT Council direct staff to proceed with the development of Vancouver's next environmental plan, Greenest City 2050, which will incorporate the work from this Climate Emergency Response report, as well as broader environmental sustainability objectives, and report back on the recommended strategy that will be integrated and coordinated with the City-wide Plan. L. THAT Council direct staff to integrate the six (6) Big Moves in this report into the development of the City-wide Plan recognizing there will be further development and refinement of the Big Moves which will be informed by and coordinated with City-wide planning. REPORT SUMMARY In January 2019, Vancouver City Council unanimously approved a motion recognizing the climate emergency that the planet faces; acknowledging that Vancouver needs to do more to reduce carbon pollution in response to that emergency; and asking staff for recommendations on how to ramp up the City's climate actions in line with efforts to limit global warming to 1.5°C. The 1.5°C limitation is a guiding target in the Paris Agreement, and it represents a level of global warming that would avoid the worst impacts of climate change and avoid overwhelming society's capacity to adapt. To ramp up the City's actions to align with 1.5°C, this report offers two complementary approaches: A set of six (6) "Big Moves" that would guide the City of Vancouver's work in response to the climate emergency. The Big Moves are intended to direct staff to pursue the City's key opportunities to meet the objective of limiting warming to 1.5°C. While they are all intended to be technically achievable, they will push the limits of what staff think can be accomplished in the next decade and staff realize that there will likely be political, financial and "pace -of -change" challenges to their implementation. If staff are directed to Climate Emerqencv Response — RTS 12978 pursue the Big Moves, any identified challenges, along with possible solutions, will be included in the reports being brought back for Council's consideration. Walkable city Heat pumps Active transportation and transit Zero emissions vehicles ■ � s Embodied carbon Negative emissions If Council endorses the Big Moves, staff will begin the analysis and engagement that is required to understand the challenges and opportunities with each, and to develop a comprehensive implementation and funding strategy. Depending on the nature of the challenges that emerge, and what we learn from our engagement process, staff may explore potential adjustments to the Big Moves, so long as they maintain consistency with the 1.5°C objective. 2. A package of 53 Accelerated Actions that build on the climate action the City has taken to date are also outlined in the report appendices. These are aligned with the Big Moves, as most will help move towards them. The reason for having these accelerated actions is, in part, to have some quick -starts to move forward on while the planning work on the Big Moves proceeds. To further align with Vancouver's efforts of limiting warming to 1.5°C, this report also recommends an updated 2050 target and a set of objectives for the City's carbon budgeting and accountability framework. Lastly, this report recommends an approach for a new Climate and Equity Working Group that will help to ensure that equity has a central place in the City's climate emergency and sustainability work. Climate Emergency Response — RTS 12978 4 COUNCIL AUTHORITY/PREVIOUS DECISIONS On January 16, 2019, Council approved a motion recognizing climate change as an emergency and directed staff to: • Review the City's climate change targets in the context of the latest research from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. • Establish a carbon budgeting approach for the City that is consistent with the 1.5°C objective. • Establish a Climate and Equity Working Group to provide guidance and support for the City's efforts to respond to the climate emergency. • Add new actions to reduce carbon pollution that align the City's efforts with the 1.5°C objective. This report provides the staff response to the January 16, 2019, climate emergency motion. The recommendations in this report build on a long history of climate planning and action at the City of Vancouver. Highlights include: • Clouds of Change (1990) • Transportation Plan (1997) • The Climate -Friendly City (2005) • EcoDensity (2008) • Greenest City Action Plan (2011) • Transportation 2040 (2012) • The Strategic Approach to Neighbourhood Energy (2012) • Healthy City Action Plan (2014) • The Renewable City Strategy (2015) and Renewable City Action Plan (2017) • The Zero Emissions Building Plan (2016) • The Electric Vehicle Ecosystem Strategy (2016) • The Zero Waste Strategy (2018) • The Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (developed in 2012 and updated in 2018) The climate emergency response directly supports the forthcoming Resilient Vancouver Strategy, which recommends objectives and actions to build resilience to major shocks and stresses impacting Vancouver now and in the future. Many of the impacts of those shocks and stresses (e.g., floods and extreme weather) are the result of inadequate mitigation actions. CITY MANAGER'S/GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The City Manager recommends approval of the foregoing. Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 5 REPORT Context a. The Risks of Climate Breakdown The threat of climate breakdown has been clearly documented by the world's scientists. Vancouver is already experiencing the impacts of 1'C of warming, including more severe storms, flooding, and forest fire smoke. Every degree of warming will increase those impacts and make it increasingly difficult, and eventually impossible, to adapt. Even half a degree is significant. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) compared the impacts from climate change in a world with 2°C of warming to one with 1.5°C and found the following: • As many as 457 million more people exposed to climate risks and related poverty. • Twice as many people suffering from water scarcity. • Twice as many plants and three times as many insects losing their habitat. • An ice -free Arctic every 10 years instead of every 100 years. • The exposure of 2.6 times as many people to extreme heat at least every five years. • Double the decline in global fisheries. The impacts of climate change do not plateau at 2°C, so any warming beyond that would mean even more severe impacts. For context, even if the commitments made by Paris -signatory countries to date were being met, the world would be on track for more than 3°C of warming by the end of this century. That degree of warming would cause a worldwide economic, environmental and social catastrophe. b. Limiting Global Warming to 1.5°C The signatory countries to the Paris Agreement (including Canada) have committed to keeping global warming below 2°C, and as close to 1.5°C as possible. In October 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released a major report making a clear case to strive for 1.5°C. The IPCC report also laid out the actions required to achieve that objective. To limit global warming to 1.5°C, the necessary changes to global energy and economic systems will be immense and will require an unprecedented degree of technological change and cooperation. Global net carbon emissions will need to be reduced to 45 per cent below 2010 levels by 2030, net zero by 2050, and net negative in the second half of the century. Cutting carbon pollution that quickly will require rapid and far-reaching transitions in energy systems, land use, transportation and buildings. Fossil fuels will ultimately need to be replaced through significant improvements in energy efficiency and a rapid shift to renewable energy and other zero emissions energy sources. In addition to reducing emissions, large quantities of carbon will need to be removed from the atmosphere (e.g., through reforestation projects, projects that enhance carbon storage in aquatic ecosystems, and projects that capture and store carbon from wood waste combustion). In addition to reducing and removing emissions (mitigation), governments also need to better prepare for the anticipated impacts of climate change (adaptation). While both mitigation and Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 6 adaptation are critical responses, this report is focused on mitigation, as per the guidance in Council's climate emergency motion. Through the course of developing this report, several new priority adaptation actions were identified. They are included in Appendix B and progress will be reported as part of the City's Adaptation Strategy. c. Growing Number of Climate Emergency Declarations In Canada and around the world, there is a growing movement of hundreds of local governments recognizing the emergency that climate change represents, accelerating their own actions, and calling on provincial/state and national governments to also ramp up their responses. Given the world's increasingly urbanized population is on the front lines of the fight against climate change, the world's urban population will disproportionately experience the effects of global warming. Collectively we have the ability to influence the directions that senior governments take in responding to the climate emergency. As a leading city within this movement, Vancouver is well positioned to help define next steps for those cities, so that we are all well aligned with the objective of limiting warming to 1.5°C. For a list of cities declaring a climate emergency see Appendix C. d. Government of BC Ramping Up Climate Action In December 2018, BC released its new climate plan, CleanBC. Phase one of the plan is designed to put the province on track for 75 per cent of the reductions it needs to meet its 2030 target (a 40 per cent reduction below 2007 levels). The specific policies in CleanBC are leading examples in North America and globally, and they provide an excellent foundation for Vancouver to align its efforts with. In launching CleanBC, Premier Horgan emphasized the need to work together to transition away from fossil fuels to renewable energy. With the work Vancouver is doing on buildings, transportation and waste, the City is well positioned to play a leading role in that effort. To learn more about CleanBC and supportive policies from the Government of Canada, see Appendix D. e. Local and Regional Governments Ramping Up Climate Action Metro Vancouver (Metro) is in the process of developing Climate 2050, which is intended to be the regional response to climate change—both in terms of reducing carbon pollution and preparing for the impacts of climate change. Metro is also beginning work on the next phase of the Regional Growth Strategy, and TransLink is embarking on an update of the Regional Transportation Strategy (RTS), which will both guide how people live, work and move around the region. Local governments across the region and province continue to adopt climate policies of their own (e.g., the Energy Step Code and electric vehicle -readiness requirements for new construction). The updates to those regional plans will continue to impact Vancouver directly through the expectations they set for the City, and indirectly through the expectations they set for other local governments within the region. Vancouver's response to the climate emergency is an opportunity to help take a leadership role and shape that regional picture. The higher the degree of alignment between the City and the region, the more likely the collective regional response to the climate emergency will align with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 7 f. Reducing Carbon Pollution has Multiple Benefits There is no question that carbon pollution needs to be rapidly reduced and reach net negative levels by the second half of the century to effectively fight climate change. No single jurisdiction can solve the problem on their own, so success depends on everyone contributing to the solution. That said, fighting climate change is not the only reason to reduce carbon, as most of the solutions being pursued in an urban context offer multiple benefits including improved heath and air quality, greater community resilience, economic development and reduced costs. See Appendix E for a more detailed discussion. Aligning Vancouver Targets with 1.5°C (Recommendation A) Council's climate emergency motion directed staff to "increase targets and accelerate timelines for actions in line with the IPCC call for 45 per cent reductions in GHG emissions over 2010 levels by 2030, net zero emissions by 2050". This section focuses on aligning the targets. a. Scope 1 and 2 Emissions Vancouver's efforts to fight climate change have focused on addressing the sources of carbon pollution the City has the greatest influence over: residential and commercial buildings, the vehicles on our roads, and our landfill. These sources (also referred to as scope 1 and scope 2 emissions) are reported in the City's annual emissions inventory and accounted for 2.6 million tonnes of carbon pollution in Vancouver in 2017 (the latest year for which data is available). The scope of Vancouver's inventory aligns with the priority sectors in the Global Protocol for Cities (a globally recognized carbon accounting standard used by hundreds of cities). For buildings, transportation and solid waste, the City's current targets for reducing carbon emissions and using renewable energy are as follows: Before 2020 2030 2050 Percentage of energy from renewable sources No target 55% 100% (including hydro power) Reduction in carbon pollution o o At least (relative to 2007) 33 /0 50 /0 80% Vancouver's 2030 carbon target (50 per cent below 2007) is largely consistent with the global reductions needed to limit warming to 1.5°C (45 per cent below 2010). Converting Vancouver's target to the same base year for consistency, the City's 2030 target is equivalent to 49 per cent below 2010 levels. Based on the City's experiences and economic modelling, achieving the 50 per cent target by 2030 is achievable yet very challenging. For 2050, the IPCC research points to a need for zero net carbon emissions on a global basis. Vancouver's current 2050 carbon target is "at least 80 per cent below 2007". While this looks like a 20 per cent difference from the IPCC research, the actual gap is expected to be smaller because the City will need to exceed the 80 per cent carbon reduction target in order to achieve the 100 per cent renewable energy target. Staff anticipate that transitioning to 100 per cent renewable energy will result in carbon pollution being reduced by approximately 75 per cent in 2040 and more than 95 per cent in 2050. Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 8 Staff recommend maintaining the 2030 targets and modifying Vancouver's 2050 target to be "carbon neutral" instead of "at least 80 per cent below 2007 levels". If approved, the actions needed to achieve this revised target would be included within Big Move 6. b. Beyond 2050 to Negative Emissions In addition to reaching net zero carbon emissions by 2050, the IPCC research concludes that global net negative emissions will be necessary in the second half of the century. Examples of how negative emissions could be achieved include reforestation projects, projects that enhance carbon storage in aquatic ecosystems, and projects that capture and store carbon from wood waste combustion. The sixth Big Move in this report (recommendation G) is intended to begin Vancouver's work on negative emissions such that the City is helping to sequester approximately 1 million tonnes of carbon pollution annually by 2060. Based on initial analysis of the IPCCs research, the 1 million tonnes is aligned with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C. c. Beyond Scope 1 and 2 to Embodied Carbon The City also bears some responsibility for the emissions that are released through the production and transportation of goods and materials used in Vancouver (referred to as scope 3 emissions). Based on the City's analysis of these additional sources of carbon pollution, priority opportunities include transitioning to lower -carbon building and construction materials, and encouraging residents and restaurants to shift to more plant -based diets, which are less carbon intensive to produce. To begin addressing Vancouver's scope 3 carbon emissions, Big Move #5 is focused on the embodied emissions in new buildings and construction projects, including a target that by 2030, those sources be reduced by 40 per cent as compared to 2018 typical practice. The Big Move is supported by a number of specific projects in the accelerated actions. Further, Project 13.b in the table of Accelerated Actions will begin work on the emissions associated with food consumption in Vancouver, and the City's efforts to shift to active transportation and transit will reduce the embodied emissions in vehicles, if the number of vehicles in the City declines. At this point, staff are not recommending targets for other sources of embodied carbon, such as those associated with food and vehicles. d. Helping Developing Jurisdictions Transition to Renewable Energy To fully be aligned with 1.5°C, jurisdictions that are wealthy by global standards (including Vancouver) need to support emissions reductions in jurisdictions without the same resources to improve energy efficiency and transition to renewable energy. Without a willingness to provide this support, it is highly unlikely that developing jurisdictions will have the resources to transition fast enough. The underlying rationale for wealthier jurisdictions providing support is that we continue to have much higher per capita emissions, and we have accumulated a great deal of our wealth through the burning of fossil fuels since the beginning of the last century. Developing jurisdictions have contributed comparatively little to global emissions and are the least equipped to reduce emissions and prepare for its impacts. Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 9 What Vancouver's role could be in helping developing jurisdictions transition to renewable energy is not well defined. Project 14.i in the accelerated actions is intended to begin the work of figuring out what that role could be. Vancouver Needs to Accelerate Progress to Align with 1.5°C While the City's 2030 target is aligned with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C, our progress towards the target is not. As shown in the following chart, Vancouver's emissions from buildings, transportation and solid waste have declined by an average of 19,000 tonnes per year over the past decade. Though we are moving in the right direction (while accommodating significant population and economic growth), progress needs to be accelerated significantly. 3M tC6 F WASTE CARBON POLLUTION -7% SINCE 2007 2007 2017 .© 2030 TARGET -54% 2030 To get on track for the City's 2030 target, Vancouver's emissions need to drop by 1.2 million tonnes. That's an average of 92,000 tonnes per year over the next decade—a five -fold increase from the past decade. For context, approximately 92,000 tonnes of reductions could be achieved individually by each of the examples below: • Switching 15 per cent of vehicle trips per year on Vancouver's roads to active transportation and transit. • Replacing 35,000 gasoline cars owned by Vancouver residents with electric cars. • Replacing 22,000 furnaces with heat pumps. • Switching the downtown district energy system to renewable energy. To reduce city-wide carbon pollution by 92,000 tonnes every year, the City will need to pursue all of these opportunities and more. The City actions needed to pursue these opportunities are presented later in the report and are covered by Recommendations B to H. Ramping Up Vancouver's Actions to Align with 1.5°C To ramp up the City's actions to align with 1.5°C, this report offers two complementary approaches, a set of six Big Moves and a package of Accelerated Actions. The Big Moves and Accelerated Actions are intended to use the range of tools available to the City, which can be grouped into investment tools, regulatory tools, and advocacy tools: • Regulatory Tools: Where the City uses its authorities under the Vancouver Charter to establish the rules that guide resident and business decisions that support zero emissions outcomes. These would typically have minimal direct cost for the City. Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 10 • Investment Tools: Where the City invests directly in equipment and infrastructure to reduce carbon pollution, and where the City provides financial incentives to encourage residents and businesses to choose zero emissions options. • Advocacy Tools: Where the City works with other governments and utilities to encourage them to apply their regulatory and investment tools to support zero emissions outcomes. It is important to consider the full range of tools because the selection will depend on the barrier that is being addressed, and it will have implications for how costs and benefits are distributed. These tools are discussed in Appendix F. a. The Big Moves (Recommendations B to G) The Big Moves are intended to pursue the key opportunities where the City's tools will be critical and the reductions are adequate to align the City's work with the objective of limiting warming to 1.5°C. The objectives are also intended to be easier to understand than traditional climate targets like a 50 per cent cut in carbon pollution. They are all intended to be achievable, while pushing to the limits of what staff think can be accomplished in the next decade in partnership with other levels of government. Big Moves #1 through #4 will accelerate and expand the City's existing work on buildings and transportation, Big Move #5 will begin important work on reducing the embodied emissions from building and construction materials, and Big Move #6 will begin the work of establishing the City's role in pursuing negative emissions. In terms of the 1.2 million tonnes of reductions targeted for 2030 from buildings, transportation and solid waste, Big Moves #1 through #4 would achieve 1.1 million tonnes.' The remaining 0.1 million tonnes plus a 0.1 million tonne buffer would be addressed by two key provincial policies that are reducing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels and the gas grid: The Renewable Gas Standard will require 15 per cent of the gas in FortisBC's distribution network to come from renewable sources by 2030, which will help reduce an additional 135,000 tonnes of carbon pollution in Vancouver. Depending on how it is designed, this Standard could also help the district energy systems in Vancouver convert to renewable heating options. The City is helping to support meeting this requirement by using renewable gas in its facilities and looking for opportunities to generate more renewable gas. • The Low Carbon Fuel Standard will require a 20 per cent cut in the carbon intensity of transportation fuels in BC by 2030, which will help reduce an additional 38,000 tonnes of carbon pollution in Vancouver. The City is helping to support meeting this requirement by using renewable fuels in our fleet, and exploring opportunities to be a producer of such fuels. If the Big Moves are approved by Council, staff will begin the analysis and engagement that is required to understand the challenges and opportunities with each, and to develop the detailed plans, policies, and funding strategies they will need. As part of that work, staff will assess the costs and benefits in greater detail and develop high-level financial strategies. Depending on the nature of the challenges that emerge and what we learn from our engagement process, staff The emissions targeted by Big Move #5 are scope 3 emissions, so while they are important contributions, they do not count directly against the 1.2 million tonnes targeted for 2030. Big Move #6 is not expected to be sequestering material amounts of carbon pollution in 2030. Climate Emergency Response — RTS 12978 11 may explore potential adjustments to the Big Moves, so long as they maintain consistency with the 1.5°C objective. All of this information would come back to Council for further consideration. The following pages describe each Big Move, including the objective staff will work toward, an initial estimate of carbon reduction potential, key actions that will likely be required for the Big Move to be successful, how the Big Move links to existing City work, and which departments will lead the work. Carbon Reduction By making it easier for people to walk/roll instead of driving, 153,000 tonnes/year Potential of carbon pollution could be reduced by 2030 (13% of the targeted reductions). Description Success for this Big Move will mean more "complete neighbourhoods" that have daily destinations, such as shops, services, jobs, parks, schools and community centres, within walking/rolling distance of where people live. For context, approximately 45% of residents live within an easy walk/roll of their daily needs today. Achieving this goal will require sensitively introducing more housing choices and essential amenities to neighbourhoods across the city. To create truly walkable neighbourhoods that are livable, compact and complete, the streets and pathways linking these daily needs will need to be safe, comfortable and attractive for walking, rolling and cycling, and supported by good access to frequent transit. Complete neighbourhoods will support local businesses, a diversity of households, healthier lifestyles, more social interaction, and reduced energy use and carbon emissions. Links to Existing The City has a long history of planning for complete and compact communities Work where it is easy to walk/roll between home and most daily destinations. Many of our most desirable communities, such as the West End, Southeast False Creek, Kitsilano, and Grandview -Woodlands, provide a rich mix of land uses and safe, connected and comfortable streets and pathways. Upcoming planning initiatives, such as the City-wide Plan, the Broadway Plan and Jericho Lands, provide opportunities to expand our approach to creating and enhancing walkable communities and pilot new strategies to accelerate our transition to a truly walkable city. Walkable and complete communities will also support the City's resilience work because people can more easily help each other and access resources during emergencies. It also supports and enhances efforts to create more diverse and affordable housing choices. Responsible 0 Led by Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability Departments 0 Supported by Engineering and Development, Buildings and Licensing Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 12 Big Move #2 Safe and convenient active transportation and transit By 2030, two thirds of trips in Vancouver will be by active transportation and o transit, which would be 10 years earlier than currently planned. ■+' ■■`' 1 (Recommendation C) Carbon Reduction By making it safer and more convenient for people to choose active transportation Potential and transit to move around the city, 141,000 tonnes/year of carbon pollution could be reduced by 2030 (12% of the targeted reductions). This would be in addition to the 153,000 tonnes in Big Move #1. Description Success for this Big Move will require a significantly improved transit capacity and efficiency, better -connected active transportation networks city-wide, and continued expansion of high-quality reliable transit across the city and region. Efforts will continue to focus on increasing affordable and safe transportation choices with access for all, and addressing gaps in the network, particularly in underserved areas. Achieving this will necessitate investment in a spectrum of improvements, from local upgrades throughout the city, to completing major projects, such as the Broadway Subway to UBC, 41St Avenue B -Line and the Granville Bridge greenway. Through this work, the number of trips people need to take in cars will decline as will the length of many vehicle trips. New policy tools will also be important with mobility pricing providing a good example because of its ability to encourage fewer vehicle trips during our most congested times of day and to provide the funds needed to expand and improve the transit and active transportation networks. While this Big Move is focused on trips that originate in Vancouver, it will provide an opportunity to engage with partners across the region to help shape Metro Vancouver's Climate 2050 plan and the Regional Transportation Strategy. Links to Existing The City has a long history of prioritizing active transportation and transit for a mix Work of reasons, such as enhanced livability, reduced congestion, affordability, improved air quality, more active lifestyles, and reduced carbon pollution. Pursuing this move will build upon Transportation 2040, which was approved in 2012 and has helped the City succeed in seeing 50% of daily trips by active transportation or transit. These efforts reduce needs for cars which can also enhance affordability of daily living in Vancouver. Responsible 0 Led by Engineering Departments 0 Supported by Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 13 Carbon Reduction The rapid transition to electric and other zero emissions vehicles would reduce Potential Vancouver's carbon pollution by 283,000 tonnes per year by 2030 (24% of the targeted reductions). Description Success for this Big Move will mean almost all new light-duty vehicles will need to be zero emissions towards the end of next decade. For light-duty fleets where vehicles are replaced more frequently (e.g., taxis, car shares, ride -hailing, etc.), almost all of these vehicles will need to be zero emissions by 2030. The transition for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles will be slower, but rapid progress will still be needed in some key market segments (e.g., in transit, where TransLink has already made a commitment for all new buses to be zero emissions by 2025). To achieve this scale of transition, there are at least three tools the City will likely need to rely on heavily: 1) expanding residential, commercial and public charging infrastructure, 2) parking policies that encourage and eventually require zero emissions vehicles, and 3) zero emissions zones that discourage and eventually ban polluting vehicles from specific areas or corridors. The timing for any zero emissions vehicle requirements and how those would be phased in for different types of vehicles would need to be explored. The City could also require any remaining gas stations to transition to zero emissions charging/fueling stations between 2030 and 2040. As the City considers these types of parking policies and zero emissions areas, it will be important to ensure that all residents and businesses have equitable access to zero emissions transport choices, and convenient and robust charging or fueling infrastructure for vehicles. This Big Move also introduces a challenge for Big Move #2 because it will result in a significant decline in gas tax revenue, which is a primary source of financing transit in the region. The work to support this Big Move will include developing a better understanding and forecasting of this challenge, exploring potential solutions that secure long term transit funding (e.g. congestion charging), and working with senior governments and partners to implement those solutions. Links to Existing This Big Move would accelerate and expand upon Vancouver's Electric Vehicle Work Ecosystem Strategy, which has guided investments in public charging infrastructure and ensured that new buildings are ready for electric vehicles. It would also link well to the City's efforts to electrify its own fleet, which has resulted in the largest electric vehicle fleet in Canada. Given that this links to the City's support of TransLink's Low Carbon Strategy towards fossil -free buses, it will be important to consider the people moving capacity of zero emission vehicles and buses as we monitor this Big Move. Responsible . Led by Engineering Departments 0 Supported by Development, Buildings and Licensing; Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability Park Board; and Real Estate and Facilities Management Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 14 Big Move #4 Zero emissions space and water heating 600 By 2025, all new and replacement heating and hot water systems will be zero -,ir emissions. (Recommendation E) Carbon Reduction Ensuring that new and replacement space and water heating systems are zero Potential emissions will reduce Vancouver's carbon pollution by 552,000 tonnes/year in 2030 (46% of the targeted reductions). Description Success for this Big Move will mean that by 2025, all space and water heating in new buildings and those replaced in existing buildings would be zero emissions. Heat pumps are expected to be an important solution is this transition. They are over 200% efficient at capturing heat from the air, ground or waste sources. They also cool buildings, which will be especially important as climate change causes hotter summers. The City's Neighbourhood Energy Utility will also need to get 100% of its energy from renewable sources by 2030 (currently 70%). For this Big Move to succeed, the Zero Emissions Building Plan for new construction will need to be sped up. New construction is critical because one quarter of the floor space in 2030 will be built over the next decade. Building that new floor space with zero emissions space and water heating starting as early as 2021 avoids the need to retrofit in the future. For existing buildings, the City will need to develop a Zero Emissions Retrofit Strategy to transition space and hot water heating to zero emissions. Furnaces and boilers last 15-25 years, while hot water heaters last closer to 10 years. Every time they are replaced is an opportunity to upgrade to zero emissions. A successful Retrofit Strategy will include sustained incentives (potentially through a Vancouver Climate Trust) and investments in industry capacity -building to support voluntary adoption of zero emissions space and water heating before 2025. Ultimately, there will need to be regulations that require zero emissions heating equipment when it is replaced (in the same way higher efficiency furnaces are already required when an old one is replaced). While 2025 is the key date to meaningfully bend the emissions reduction curve, moving this quickly will have implications on factors such as costs and business' ability to adapt to new opportunities. Success will depend on understanding where there are concerns and finding effective ways of addressing them. Also critical will be a jobs transition roadmap. In addition, careful consideration and analysis of the use of incentives is required in order to preserve affordability and avoid displacement of existing residents, particularly in aging rental buildings. Links to Existing Implementation of Zero Emissions Building Plan (2016) is ongoing. The City Work continues to require energy efficiency upgrades when a building is retrofitted, which help make the switch to zero emissions heating more affordable. The Neighborhood Energy Utility has been providing low -carbon heat and hot water to customer base in Southeast False Creek since 2010, and expansion is underway to parts of Mount Pleasant, North East False Creek and the False Creek Flats. The City has transitioned boilers to heat pumps at a growing number of its own facilities, including City Hall. This Big Move also supports the Vancouver Housing Strategy by ensuring homes are healthier and have lower energy costs. Responsible 0 Led by Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability Departments 0 Supported by Development, Buildings and Licensing; Engineering; and Real Estate and Facilities Management Climate Emerqencv Response — RTS 12978 15 Carbon Reduction By reducing the embodied carbon emissions in new construction projects, 78,000 Potential tonnes/year of carbon pollution could be reduced by 2030. This reduction does not count against the 1.2 million tonnes the City is targeting because nearly all embodied emissions are not included in the City's current inventory. Description Success for this Big Move will mean a shift in construction practices to: use more mass timber and low carbon concrete, rely more on prefabricated and modular construction, eliminate spray foam insulation with high -carbon blowing agents, and use more recycled aggregate and asphalt. Further, a shift in design practices to less underground parking and the retention or re -use of existing materials will also be outcomes of this Big Move. In addition to reducing carbon pollution, these outcomes have the potential to support BC's sustainable forest sector and our economy, improve seismic resilience, and open up more affordable construction options, specifically around mass timber and reduced parking. The first phases of implementation of the Zero Emissions Building Plan have resulted in a significant reduction in operational GHG emissions for new construction. However, the embodied emissions of a new building are significant and can typically be equivalent to (and sometimes two times greater than) the operational emissions from that same building. Initial work towards this Big Move is expected to include removing regulatory barriers to increased mass timber construction and introducing requirements for lower embodied emissions. As with the Zero Emissions Building Plan, the work to achieve the target cannot depend on regulations alone. To recognize the steep learning curve for many designers, developers and building occupants, the work will include incentives for early adopters, industry capacity -building and City leadership. The City will need to work with regional, provincial, national and international partners to improve standards and protocols for embodied emissions accounting in order for this work to be successful. Links to Existing Embodied carbon in construction is a relatively new area of consideration for the Work City. The most recent update to the Green Building Policy for Rezoning requires developers to report embodied carbon in their projects and the City has been using lower -carbon concrete and higher rates of aggregate and asphalt recycling. Responsible . Led by Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability and Engineering Departments 0 Supported by Development, Buildings and Licensing; and Real Estate and Facilities Management Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 16 Big Move #6 Restored forests and coasts By 2030, restoration work will be completed on enough forest and coastal ecosystems in Vancouver and the surrounding region to remove one million tonnes of carbon pollution annually by 2060. (Recommendation G) Carbon Reduction =M Through reforestation and coastline rehabilitation, the materials planted will be Potential capable of removing and sequestering at least one million tonnes of CO2 per year by 2060. The reductions will be minimal in 2030 because ecosystems take time to recover and grow once any planting is complete. Description Conserving, restoring, and creating forest and coastal ecosystems will remove large amounts of carbon from the atmosphere and sequester it as vegetation and in the soil as organic matter. Natural shorelines also increase resilience to sea level rise associated with climate change. In addition to carbon sequestration benefits, forests and coastal ecosystems (e.g., eelgrass meadows and salt marshes) play an important role in supporting cultural practices and providing ecosystem services and resilience to people and wildlife, both in Vancouver and in the surrounding areas. Success for this Big Move will mean: • Increasing Vancouver's tree canopy, especially in underserved communities. • Collaborating with the Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh Peoples to restore lands. • Partnering with Environment and Climate Change Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, BC Ministry of Environment, Metro Vancouver, Port of Vancouver, Vancouver Aquarium, and others to conserve and restore coastal ecosystems, such as the eelgrass meadows of Spanish Banks. • Improving water quality of receiving waterbodies to a standard that supports marine life water quality objectives. • Large-scale restoration of shorelines and subtidal zones along False Creek, the Fraser River, English Bay, Burrard Inlet and Trout Lake. • Conservation of large tracts of coastal forest, such as the Coastal Douglas Fir Biogeoclimatic Zone, which is a rare local forest ecosystem. Links to Existing The City has some experience in these types of carbon sequestration projects Work through the Greenest City Action Plan, although carbon has never been a primary reason for the projects (e.g., tree canopy goals and the New Brighton Park Shoreline Habitat Restoration Project). The Rain City Strategy, Urban Forest Strategy, Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, Resilient Vancouver Strategy, and Biodiversity Strategy also support actions related to this Big Move. This Big Move would be a significant expansion of scale of the City's work in this field. Responsible 0 Led by Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability Departments 0 Supported by Park Board and Engineering. Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 17 b. The Accelerated Actions (Recommendation H) The climate emergency will not pause while the Big Moves take time with engagement to develop into robust strategies. In order to respect that urgency, staff have also developed a set of Accelerated Actions that build on existing work and can move forward without delay. Many of the Accelerated Actions are expected to become important elements in the Big Moves as they develop, but they can be safely initiated concurrent with that work. They may need to be strengthened to adequately support a Big Move and they may need to be complemented with other actions. This work can be seen as `no -regrets' as it is very unlikely that any of the Accelerated Actions would stop making sense even after the Big Moves are developed. Several of the Accelerated Actions address sources of carbon pollution not covered by any of the Big Moves. Of note are Accelerated Actions 12.a and 13.b, which relate to the emissions from our food system. Growing, processing and transporting our food are material sources of carbon emissions, but at this time, staff do not have a clear enough picture of how much they can be reduced or what the most appropriate roles are for the City to articulate a meaningful Big Move for food consumption. Staff will continue to monitor and pursue this opportunity as these plans are reviewed and updated. The full list of Accelerated Actions is contained in Appendix A. Each action includes a short description of the action and how it reduces carbon pollution, information on whether the action is a next step or a new action, what the next milestone in the project would be, and which departments are responsible for the action. Given the large number of Accelerated Actions, the next milestone for most of them is a report back to Council to provide a more thorough opportunity to understand and discuss them. Some of those reports will be for single Accelerated Actions, and in other cases staff will bundle Accelerated Actions into logical groupings or the Big Moves. Carbon Budgeting (Recommendation 1) In January 2019, Council directed staff to "establish a remaining carbon budget for corporate and community emissions commensurate with limiting warming to 1.5°C, re-evaluate how to best measure such emissions, and report annually on the expenditure of the City of Vancouver's remaining carbon budget". The field of carbon budgeting is nascent and definitions vary by jurisdictional context. A review of existing national and sub -national carbon budgets showed two main groups of approaches: a. Remaining Carbon Budgeting These approaches focus on total present and future GHGs in the atmosphere, rather than reductions from chosen "baselines". They typically look at the remaining amount of carbon "room" left in the atmosphere before there is an unacceptable risk of a global temperature threshold being exceeded. This room is continuously decreasing due to the carbon we emit, leading to approaches that budget the remaining allowable carbon. In practice, a jurisdiction takes a portion of that global room and sets immediate and medium-term multi-year budgets, leading eventually to their maximum allowable carbon limit. Examples: UK, London, Australia, New Zealand Climate Em — RTS 12978 An advantage of multi-year budgets is that they focus on efforts to reduce long-term accumulation of emissions in the atmosphere, rather than fluctuations in the rate of emissions due to near-term factors (e.g., weather; economic and investment cycles). 18 A cumulative multi-year goal is a commitment to reduce, or control the increase of, cumulative emissions over a target period to a fixed absolute quantity. Cumulative multi-year goals are often referred to as "carbon budgets. " This type of multi-year goal is framed as a fixed -level goal because it is not defined in reference to a base year or baseline scenario. - Mitigation Goal Standard, World Resources Institute b. Carbon Reduction Accounting These approaches add up carbon -reduction contributions (likened to GHG "spending") to achieve a cumulative reduction against a chosen target. They focus on transparency in investments, programs and policies that lead to emissions reductions. Examples: Oslo, London, British Columbia (TBD) To achieve this, they can be broken down by sector or program, and include such information as time period, cost, contributions to carbon goals, and responsibility. Because they are additive, an advantage is that any gap in achieving the necessary reductions against the target becomes visible, demanding a response. [Oslo's] climate budget is a tool to convert a city's climate goals into concrete, annual, measurable action. It establishes a maximum GHG emissions level for the budget year, based on the city's emissions goal. The budget details the city's proposed short-term, emissions -reduction actions to stay within the maximum amount, their projected impact, and cost. It is a distinct part of the city's overall budget and moves through the city's usual budgeting process, from proposal to adoption, implementation, and after -action assessment. - Game Changers Report, Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 19 Overall, carbon targets reframed as maximum "budgets" can help enforce more rigorous approaches to managing carbon. They can list carbon impacts and ownership line -by-line. They can allocate and transfer carbon between different sources to balance out the big picture (see the Improved Accountability section). Reassessed, a carbon budget periodically gives opportunities for course corrections where necessary. Carbon budgets can help clearly communicate the impact of carbon -reduction efforts to the public, the City organization, and stakeholders. While more transparent, any budget requires accountability on implementation, with potentially some form of consequence (and mechanism to redress) if budgets are not met. Objectives for Vancouver Approach Staff will work to develop carbon budgets for Vancouver's corporate and community emissions. Final approaches may draw elements from both approaches discussed previously. A carbon budget is only useful if it helps to guide appropriate, agile, and accountable effort to reduce emissions. As such, any shift to a budget approach for Vancouver's City -corporate and community emissions should aim to meet the following objectives: • Improved Transparency • Better Data • Better Forecasting • CleanBC Alignment • Improved Accountability These objectives are detailed in Appendix G, along with sample considerations to be resolved in developing a carbon budget approach. Next Steps If approved, an approach for corporate emissions will be developed and implemented first, to confirm the objectives are being met, and to test if it can be replicated for community emissions. Developing the corporate approach now aligns well with the forthcoming Green Operations Plan refresh. If multi-year budgets are set, the first budget cycle (e.g., 2019-2022) can be used to refine carbon budget approaches. Nearly all City departments will be involved (e.g., Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability; Finance, Risk and Supply Chain Management; Engineering Services; Real Estate and Facilities Management; Technology Services). Staff will report back with an update on the carbon budget approaches to Council, in line with the progress update on climate emergency measures in 2020. Climate and Equity Working Group (Recommendation J) Climate change shocks and stresses do not affect all groups in our community equally. Those that have been affected by systemic vulnerabilities and inequity are often at greater risk from the impacts of climate change and often have the fewest resources to respond and adapt. In Vancouver, climate change impacts, such as extreme heat and poor air quality from wildfires, are already being felt disproportionately. In parallel, we know that it's critical to engage with and support systemically excluded and low- income populations as we transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. That transition can be Climate Emergency Response — RTS 12978 20 undertaken in ways that improve social equity and affordability, while alleviating issues such as "energy poverty". For example, convenient public transit helps reduce carbon emissions and air pollution while also supporting affordable mobility for all residents. In the U.S., a growing number of cities are advancing equity in parallel with their climate action work, using input from Climate and Equity Committees. Portland, Seattle, and Washington, D.C., have each applied an equity lens to their climate work, to minimize the impacts of climate change on systemically excluded populations and ensure that new policies do not negatively impact vulnerable populations, while also identifying ways to support greater equity through climate action. Similarly, the Canadian Urban Sustainability Network recently completed a study that identified the significant extent of energy poverty across the country and highlighted the need for equity considerations in climate plans. Social Policy is currently developing an Equity Framework to formalize the City's equity -focused work and to promote access, inclusion, cultural safety, and public participation for all staff and residents, and across all City areas of business. Creating a Climate and Equity Working Group would provide an early opportunity to use the tools of the Equity Framework to engage with systemically excluded and low-income residents on the City's climate and sustainability work, ensuring that the actions put forward in Greenest City 2050 and ongoing response to the climate emergency improve social equity. The Climate and Equity Working Group will coordinate with the City-wide Plan effort regarding equity conversations as both programs develop. It will also be an important opportunity to incorporate a gendered intersectional lens into the City's climate actions and the Climate Adaptation Strategy. More details of the Climate and Equity Work group can be found in Appendix H. Greenest City 2050 (Recommendations K and L) Vancouver's current environmental strategy, the Greenest City Action Plan, extends to 2020. All ten of the goal areas are relevant for Vancouver's Climate Emergency Response. The ten goals are: 1. Climate and Renewables 6. Clean Water 2. Green Buildings 7. Local Food 3. Green Transportation 8. Clean Air 4. Zero Waste 9. Green Economy 5. Access to Nature 10. Lighter Footprint Because of the strong links between the climate emergency and the City's broader sustainability work, the climate emergency response will be most effective if it is embedded within the next phase of the Greenest City Action Plan and integrated with the upcoming City-wide Plan. To enable this coordination, staff are seeking approval from Council to begin the creation of Vancouver's next environmental action plan, Greenest City 2050. If approved, staff will report back on the Greenest City 2050 in coordination with the City wide Plan reporting structure. Further, staff will integrate the six Big Moves in this report into the development of the City-wide Plan which will address a broad diversity of policy areas including land -use, transportation, economy, social, environment, parks, culture, sustainability, climate change, infrastructure, and place-making/urban design with lenses of reconciliation, resiliency and equity. The City-wide Plan will provide an "umbrella" for integrated, long-range strategic Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 21 policy across these areas and a framework to support more detailed implementation strategies in specific areas such as climate change. This framework would enable a coordinated system of progress monitoring, investment, policy review and adaptation over time to achieve community, Council and corporate goals. Climate Emergency Engagement Within the 90 -day window kicked off by Council's climate emergency motion on January 19, 2019, engagement efforts have focused internally and on organizations where the City has established relationships. The internal engagement included meetings and workshops with staff from Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability; Engineering; Development, Buildings and Licensing; Real Estate and Facilities Management; Social Policy; Park Board; Legal Services; Finance; and Intergovernmental Relations. The primary external engagement was a half-day workshop on February 25, which was attended by 112 individuals from local businesses, environmental non-governmental organizations, community associations, labour organizations, academia, and other levels of government. During the event, staff collected nearly 900 ideas during sixteen breakout sessions, which focused on new and existing buildings, neighbourhood energy systems, zero emissions vehicles, active transportation and transit, the City's corporate leadership, embodied carbon, and climate equity. Implications/Related Issues/Risk Financial Should Council approve the recommendations of the Climate Emergency Response, staff will report back by the Fall of 2020 with a comprehensive implementation and financial strategy for the recommended Big Moves and Accelerated Actions. When developing the strategy, staff will strive to optimize the City's regulatory, financial and advocacy tools, considering the City's financial and operational capacity within the context of the City's service planning, capital planning and budget framework and the financial impacts (costs and savings) for the City's residents and businesses, utilities, and other levels of government. If any of the Big Moves is ready for Council's consideration before the Fall of 2020, staff will report back with an implementation and financial strategy that contemplates any links to the Big Moves still under development. Any Accelerated Actions brought forward in advance of the comprehensive implementation and financial strategy will be supported by a similar evaluation, including a consolidated assessment of any initiative proposed as part of the 2020 budget. Human Resources The Accelerated Actions can start to be advanced to their next milestones with existing staff capacity. Depending on the proposed next steps at those milestones, there may be staff implications, and staff will include any required staff resource as part of the annual budget process. Advancing the Big Moves from their current form to robust implementation strategies will be a significant undertaking that transects across departments. It will also require additional engagement with the public, other governments, utilities, business, labour, academia and NGOs to ensure a wide variety of perspectives are reflected as the Big Moves are developed. Additional or reallocated staff will likely be required and as the Big Moves are developed staffing needs will be brought for approval as necessary. Climate Emeraencv Response — RTS 12978 22 Legal Staff will engage Legal Services to confirm, if necessary, the legal authority for the City to implement any of the Big Moves, Accelerated Actions or any specific step or activity contemplated in either one. If the City does not have the legal authority under the Vancouver Charter to implement one or more of the foregoing, and if at such time the City still wishes to pursue such action, staff will engage Legal Services to work collaboratively with the Province for the specific legal authority under the Vancouver Charter. Conclusion The world is at a tipping point between a climate disaster and a renewable, more equitable future. By choosing to act, Vancouver is choosing optimism and hope over despair and darkness. The transition will take time and will be challenging, but many cities around the world and even some Vancouver neighbourhoods are already thriving as low carbon communities. Through a thoughtful transition Vancouver can continue to move toward a healthier, more communal, more secure, greener and more affordable future and in doing so be a beacon for other cities to follow. Appendix A — Accelerated Actions How this Action Reduces New Action Next APPENDIX A PAGE 1 OF 20 Department category Acceieratea Action c;arnon Pollution vs. Next Step milestone Leaa(s) 1 City-wide a. Sustainable Mode Splits: Expand policies and actions that Compact, livable Next Step Report back to PDS, ENG Planning lead to communities with very low motor vehicle reliance (e.g., communities not only Council on Use city-wide 15-20% of daily trips) by ensuring: a) most daily household produce healthier and progress. planning and destinations are within walking or biking distance and/or within happier residents, but reduce Target Q4 quick -start walking distance of rapid transit; b) requirements for parking costs and greatly reduce 2020. housing actions reflect this; and c) that the allocation of public space supports dependence on fossil fuels to advance walking, cycling and transit. Pilot this approach on major through a reduction in vehicle green buildings development sites and planning areas, such as the Jericho ownership and kilometres and sustainable Lands and Broadway Area Plan, by setting neighbourhood- travelled by vehicle. transportation specific mode -split targets and showcasing integrated multi - objectives. modal land use and transportation planning that can be learned from and replicated throughout the City. b. Infill Pilot Program: Investigate feasibility and details of a To be eligible for incentives, New Action Study PDS pilot program in RS and RT zones to incentivize new types of the infill housing would need feasibility. infill housing that reduce climate change impacts and improve to be near -zero emissions, Report back to unit accessibility. The pilot will be based on the Character and there could also be an Council with Homes Incentive Program as a model for introducing housing opportunity to reduce details and choice and meeting public interest objectives. embodied emissions. process (summer 2019). c. Small Townhouse Pilot Program: Investigate feasibility and To be eligible for the pilot New Action Study PDS details of a townhouse pilot program on large lots in low- program, the townhomes feasibility. density areas to demonstrate construction and design would need to be near -zero Report back to approaches that reduce climate change impacts and improve emissions, and there could Council with unit accessibility. also be an opportunity to details and reduce embodied emissions. process (summer 2019). APPENDIX A PAGE 2OF20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department L;ategory ACcelerateO Action t;aroon Ponution VS. Next Jtep milestone Leaa S d. Barriers to Low Embodied Carbon: Review existing zoning The embodied emissions New Action Study PDS, DBL regulations and design guidelines to identify how the existing from building materials, such feasibility. regulatory framework requires and incentivizes as concrete and foam Report back to the construction of low-density buildings with high embodied plastics, can be significant in Council with carbon (e.g., lots of concrete), and investigate how those the overall life -cycle details and requirements and incentives could be removed to enable low- emissions of a building. By process carbon building construction. Examples include regulations identifying and removing (summer and guidelines that limit above -grade floor area and therefore incentives for construction 2019). require or encourage below -grade living space with high embodied (basements) and underground parking, both of which require carbon and enabling more concrete. construction methods with low levels of embodied carbon, the City can help to reduce those emissions sources. e. City-wide and Area -Specific Plans: At the time of their Large-scale planning New Action Report back to PDS, DBL development or during review, city-wide and area -specific exercises can foster Council by 04 plans should make provisions to advance near -zero emissions community expectations and 2020. buildings. This could include considerations such as create opportunities for low - articulating access to sunlight for neighbouring buildings at the carbon building forms and block scale, allowances for simplified low -carbon building features, such as high levels forms, and roof alignment and design allowances to enable of insulation, mass -timber, solar energy. and roof top solar. Mass timber may also be a key to more affordable multi -unit residential buildings. APPENDIX A PAGE 3OF20 2 Zero Emissions a. How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Category Accelerated Action Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) f. Expanded Goals for Design Guidelines: Gather data and Design guidelines for new New Action Report back to PDS, DBL combustion engine vehicles are restricted or deterred, and expand the factors considered in the development of design developments are Council by Q4 active transportation and zero emissions transit are guidelines so that in addition to livability and neighbourhood established to maintain 2020. encouraged, in order to explore innovative emissions impacts, we consider cost, climate change mitigation, and livability for both new and areas. reduction programs. Identify areas of the City where these seismic resilience, if/when warranted. Pilot this approach by existing residents, but can approaches can be explored, and identify replicable lessons integrating consideration of data and these other factors into lead to complex building for city-wide implementation. the development of new or revised design guidelines for a forms that may have specified form/development type. Initially constraining this to a significant implications for specific set of guidelines will reduce the variables and support construction cost, energy higher quality data. The resultant guidelines could include efficiency, and embodied alternate approaches to built form, incentives, or conditional carbon. approval paths for projects that are designed to achieve near - zero building standards in addition to livability and affordability outcomes. 2 Zero Emissions a. Zero Emissions Areas: Begin engaging residents and Zero emissions areas New Action Report back to PDS, ENG, Areas businesses on zero emissions areas, where access by encourage a broader shift to Council on DBL, CEC Explore zero combustion engine vehicles are restricted or deterred, and zero emissions vehicles, initial emissions active transportation and zero emissions transit are including for goods engagement transformational encouraged, in order to explore innovative emissions movement. They can also be by Q4 2020. areas. reduction programs. Identify areas of the City where these designed to encourage active approaches can be explored, and identify replicable lessons transportation. The areas for city-wide implementation. also offer air quality, health and noise benefits for residents. Accelerated Action Land Use a. Time-limited pre -regulatory Density Bonus incentives for Incentives for Zero Emission buildings: Explore defining buildings that Green Buildings deliver near -zero operational and/or low embodied carbon Use land -use emissions as an amenity, so that they can be subject to the tools to density bonus provision under Section 165.2(1) of the encourage zero Vancouver Charter. If Council defines these buildings as an emissions amenity, this would allow staff to explore and report back on buildings, zero specific opportunities to allow time-limited density bonuses for emissions a wider range of green buildings, including zero emissions space/water commercial and institutional buildings, and buildings with low heating embodied carbon. Incentives would be in place until equipment, and equivalent regulatory requirements come into effect. Staff low -carbon would ensure that any recommended short-term bonus materials. programs are aligned with provision of rental and non -market housing and other community goals. Deep Emissions Retrofits: Explore land -use tools that help property owners and managers undertake deep emissions retrofits of existing buildings. This could include revised district schedules that would allow increased usable space in existing buildings in exchange for the deep emissions, and possibly for seismic resilience retrofit. APPENDIX A PAGE 4OF20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) The early stages of transformational change often involve higher costs and uncertainties than continuing with conventional approaches. In order to gain experience and drive down these costs, incentives are temporarily required while new practices and products are normalized. Defining low - carbon buildings as an amenity would allow staff to introduce time-limited pre - regulatory policies and amendments to the Zoning and Development Bylaw that would allow for modest density bonuses for a wider range of green buildings, including zero emissions commercial and institutional buildings and buildings with low embodied carbon. This would better ensure an equitable distribution of the health, comfort, resilience and operational cost savings of low -carbon buildings. Careful consideration and analysis of the use of increases in usable space to encourage retrofits are needed to preserve affordability and avoid displacement of existing residents. New Action New Action Report back to Council (Q2 2019). Report back to Council by Q2 2020. PDS, DBL PDS, DBL APPENDIX A PAGE 5OF20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Category Accelerated Action Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) c. Improved Floor Space Incentives for Zero Emissions: The early stages of Next Step Report back to PDS, DBL Explore floor space exclusion for near zero emissions transformational change often Council with detached and small multifamily buildings that is streamlined involve higher costs and recommendati and enhanced relative to City's current approach. Current uncertainties than continuing ons by Q4 wall -thickness and mechanical -space exclusions for near zero with conventional 2019. emissions buildings require additional work for small builders approaches. In order to gain and staff. Simplifying this with a temporary outright exclusion experience and drive down would simplify the process and would allow for consideration these costs, incentives are of modest additional floor space for early adopters of near temporarily required while zero emissions design approaches. new practices and products are normalized. While this approach is already being used by other local governments in the region, careful consideration is required to ensure this does not undermine efforts to increase housing supply in traditional single family neighbourhoods. 4 Financial a. Financial Incentives for Existing Building Energy Meaningful energy retrofits of New Action Report back to PDS, REFM, Incentives for Retrofits: Explore options for deep energy retrofits of existing existing buildings are more Council by Q2 FIN Zero Emissions City and private buildings in connection with Council's motion challenging than 2019. Buildings and to allocate $5 million of Capital Plan funding. Options will implementing similar Equipment include: 1) accelerate the transition of existing City buildings to measures in new Implement near zero and zero emissions; 2) enhance the capacity of for construction, necessitating incentives to non-profit housing operators to access significant provincial the provision of financial make it easier and federal capital improvement funding; and 3) through a incentives. Measures are in and more new collaborative approach, leverage provincial funding and place and will be affordable to energy utility administrative capacity to effectively provide strengthened to ensure advance zero additional resources to Vancouver homeowners and building retrofit incentives do not emissions new operators to make deep emission reduction retrofits to their result in the displacement of buildings and buildings. This includes pilot projects in partnership with the existing residents. zero emissions provincial government to retrofit affordable market rental space/water housing and non -market housing. APPENDIX A PAGE 6OF20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department L;ategory ACcelerateO Action t;aroon Ponution Vs. Next Jtep milestone Leaa S heating b. Climate Trust: Explore the creation of a Vancouver Climate Staff will need to explore the New Action Report back to PDS, FIN, equipment. Trust, which would have the objective of providing ongoing balance of decreasing Council by Q2 DBL investments to reduce emissions from existing buildings. The maximum allowed emissions 2020 in Trust will continue the work started in 4a and coordinate with limits, the introduction of conjunction the Low Carbon Cities Canada initiative announced in the embodied emissions limits, with 2019 federal budget. Staff will evaluate potential funding and the impacts of a potential recommended streams as part of the exploration process, including the charge to offset any updates to possibility of a one-time charge on new developments in the remaining emissions to Green Building City that would be proportional to their anticipated emissions. ensure that existing housing Policy for affordability or the viability of Rezoning. new developments is not materially impacted. In addition, staff will need to ensure that any new investment minimizes the displacement of existing residents. c. Heat Pump Permits: Make it more affordable and easier to Electric heat pumps are Next Step Report back to PDS, DBL get a permit for heat pumps. Options to explore include typically over 200% efficient, Council by Q1 reducing the permit fee to a fixed and nominal amount (as is result in almost no carbon 2020 if currently done for solar permits), moving to an online emissions due to the nearly required. permitting system where feasible, allowing heat pumps to be 100% renewable electrical installed in front yards, and publishing a list of heat pumps that grid in BC, and can provide meet the City's noise limits. The applicability of successful both heating and cooling, solutions to other key zero emissions technologies, such as thereby increasing resilience electric vehicle charging and solar panels, will be considered. to climate changes. Because heat pumps are a new technology for most existing homes, installations and the permitting process can be more complex. Simplifying the process is essential to accelerate the voluntary installation of heat pumps. ory ACcelerateq Action Zero Emissions a. New Zero Emissions Buildings: Explore opportunities to set Building lower carbon emissions limits for new construction faster than Standards laid out in the Zero Emissions Building Plan. Any proposed Accelerate the changes to those limits would be based on the appropriate implementation research and consultation, and would work within established of the Zero timelines for policy and bylaw updates. To continue Emissions encouraging the development of Passive House buildings, that Building Plan. standard would continue to be a recognized compliance option. �. Improved Compliance: Develop the tools, processes, and resources to ensure that the carbon emissions limits for new detached and multi -family residential buildings are being complied with and that developers and builders have support to meet them. One key option to be explored is a requirement for a heating permit for new detached homes and low-rise buildings (an approach used in other Lower Mainland municipalities). APPENDIX A PAGE 7OF20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Maroon rouution Every building built to zero emissions today means one less building requiring expensive retrofits in the future. Accelerating this work will save carbon emissions and money. The City does not currently review or inspect the sizing, performance specification or quality of installation of many of the mechanical systems that are essential to reducing GHG emissions in new construction. New policy or regulation without compliance only punishes responsible developers and builders. VS. Next Next Step New Action muestone Report back as part of recommended updates to VBBL and Green Building Policy for Rezoning by Q2 2020. Report back as part of recommended updates to VBBL by Q2 2020. PDS, DBL PDS, DBL Neighbourhood Energy Transition the City -owned Neighbourhood Energy Utility to 100% renewable energy and expand the system. Active Transportation and Transit Infrastructure Accelerate the development of infrastructure to make it easier to choose walking, cycling Accelerated Action i. Renewable Energy Supply: Transition the Neighbourhood Energy Utility (NEU) to 100% renewable energy before 2030. This could include a mix of expanded sewer heat recovery, waste heat recovered from data centres, thermal energy storage, bio -fuels (e.g., renewable natural gas), hydrogen, or other renewable energy sources. Currently, 70% of the NEU's energy comes from renewable sources, and opportunity exists to transition to a higher blend of renewable energy in future years. b. Expand Service Area: Evaluate feasibility for expansion of the City -owned NEU service area. Opportunity areas include areas of the Central Broadway Corridor adjacent to SE False Creek, Jericho Lands and False Creek South. Improved Bus Service: Accelerate transit priority implementation on key routes, such as 41St Avenue, Georgia Street, Main Street and Hastings Street, as part of the ongoing bus speed and reliability program. A quick win would be further extension of bus lane hours beyond current peak hours. How this Action Reduces Carbon Pollution By transitioning to 100% renewable energy, NEU- connected buildings will not need to rely on fossil -based natural gas for space and water heating. Factoring in the long-term growth of the utility, transitioning to a 100% renewable energy target could eliminate an additional 10,000 tonnes of CO2 per year by the mid 2030s, above and beyond the current 70% renewable energy target for the NEU (current 70% target would net 24,000 tonnes per year reduction at build -out of the customer base). To be determined, following establishment of proposed land uses and densities for these areas (needed to inform business case analysis for expansion). Enabling improved bus service makes it a more efficient and attractive option for residents. Articulated buses generate 25% of the carbon emissions per person relative to a single occupancy vehicle, which can be improved to 5% with the use of electric buses. New Action vs. Next Ste Next Step Next Step Next Step Next Milestone Adoption of 2030100% renewable target subject to evaluation using the NEU's existing investment decision framework and competitivenes s with other low carbon energy options for buildings Report back to Council in 2021 (timing dependent on timing of area plan Report back to Council on engagement. Target Q2 2020. APPENDIX A PAGE 8OF20 Department ENG ENG ENG Accelerated Action APPENDIX A PAGE 9OF20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) and transit. b. Active Transportation Network: Explore opportunities to Providing safe, equitable Next Step Report back to ENG accelerate the completion of accessible and equitable active active transportation Council on transportation networks, and close key gaps, including the infrastructure encourages opportunities. Granville Bridge pathway. walking and cycling, Target Q3 decreasing reliance on 2020. private vehicles and the associated carbon emissions. c. E -Bike Share: Add 500 electric -assist bicycles (e -bikes) and Replacing higher carbon Next Step Report back to ENG 50 electrified stations to the public bike share (PBS) system. (private motor vehicle, taxi, Council on E -bikes have been shown to provide mobility to those with transit) emissions trips with opportunities. physical limitations that prohibit cycling, increase ridership lower emissions ones, like during 2019. among currently underrepresented groups and enable longer PBS with e -bikes. Currently trips for a greater variety of trip purposes. about 47% of PBS trips replace higher carbon modes. E -bikes have at least doubled the number of rides per bike per day compared to the current system in other cities. Compared to other systems, expected usage will be at least 4.5 rides per bike per day. Average trip distance is expected to be 3.5 km, so 500 bikes are expected to replace over 1,380,000 km of polluting trips annually (conservative estimate, NYC has shown 5x more usage per bike than this estimate). Accelerated Action Transportation a. City-wide Transportation Demand Management Program: Demand Encourage shifting travel behaviour from driving to sustainable Management modes. Coordinate, track, and monitor existing cross -branch Enhanced activities (including efforts with School Active Travel, Walk + transportation Bike + Roll promotions, and new developments) to leverage demand existing infrastructure investments. Complete gap analysis management to and develop programming to encourage mode shift and support walking, address under -targeted markets, such as major employers cycling and and institutions. transit. b. Support for electric bikes: Explore options to encourage the safe use of electric bikes and electric cargo bikes, especially for longer commutes, steeper terrain and for those with limited physical capacity. As part of this work, staff will explore options of partnering with the provincial government to extend CleanBC incentives for electric vehicles to electric bikes. c. Transportation Pricing: Undertake a comprehensive City - focused transportation pricing review to explore equitable and comprehensive applications for all modes (e.g., road and curb pricing) that would help curtail vehicle emissions and support zero emissions mobility. To be aligned with regional mobility pricing work. APPENDIX A PAGE 10 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) Encourage behaviour change to travel by sustainable modes. Promote efficient use of existing infrastructure. A switch to electric bikes or cargo bikes from private vehicle trips reduces gasoline and diesel use. They also make that switch possible for longer trips, trips with kids or a heavy load, and for people who might not be able to travel by a non -electric bike. Pricing road and curb space is a powerful tool for decreasing congestion resulting in high concentrations of emissions and discouraging vehicle travel. Revenue from mobility pricing can also be directed towards supporting sustainable travel. Next Step Report back to ENG Council on progress. Target Q3 2020. New Action For ENG consideration in service planning for 2020. New Action Report back to Council on progress. Target Q3 2020. ENG, PDS APPENDIX A PAGE 11 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Category Accelerated Action Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) d. Parking Requirements: Update the Parking Bylaw to: 1) How a city prioritizes parking Next Step Report back to ENG expand the transportation demand management (TDM) clearly signals its priorities Council on options available to developments outside of the downtown around livability and progress. core and allow for elimination or reduction of parking stall sustainability. Successful and Target Q3 requirements in those developments (except for accessible livable cities support parking 2020. and visitor parking), and 2) explore design standards that and driving for those who enable parking stalls to be repurposed in the future if they need it, and ensure other aren't needed for parking (e.g., flat floor plates and over -height modes are readily available ceilings). This work would be in addition to the planned to the rest. With limited space monitoring of the effectiveness TDM program for new and money, parking should developments. be a low priority when designing an affordable, green city. Reduced parking also helps to reduce the embodied emissions in new construction if less concrete is needed, and it can also lead to reduced embodied emissions from vehicles as car ownership declines. e. On -Street Car Share Parking: Update bylaws and create It has been estimated that New Action Report to ENG agreements to allow car share vehicles to end trips and have households participating in Council 02 stopovers at on -street metered parking spaces. two-way car share programs 2019. (e.g., Modo, Zipcar) reduce their annual vehicle -related GHGs by up to 54% on average. For households participating in one-way car share programs (car2go, Evo), vehicle -related GHG emissions declined by up to 15% on average. Car sharing is also a proven way to reduce vehicle ownership, vehicle kilometres travelled and transportation costs for residents utilizing car sharing. gory ACcelerateO Action Goods a. Urban Freight and Fleets: Develop an urban freight and Movement and fleets strategy to identify the needs for regional and longer - Fleets distance goods movement, and the opportunities for lower - Reduce carbon impact goods movement, deliveries, and servicing in the urban emissions from environment. The strategy will also address the transition of freight and private fleets to zero emissions vehicles (including light-, private fleets medium- and heavy-duty vehicles). Elements of the strategy operating in could include increasing the use of cargo bikes for freight, Vancouver. provision of logistics hubs, time -of -day and loading zone policies, commercial vehicle licensing policies, and leveraging rail or other modes to reduce truck travel. b. Curbside Zone Management: Update the management and enforcement of on -street curbside zones (e.g., commercial loading zones) so that they more effectively encourage efficient use of street space and encourage the transition to zero emissions commercial vehicles. How this Action Reduces Maroon vouution Reduces greenhouse gas emissions of goods movement by decreasing the distance travelled by trucks, transitioning to zero emissions vehicles, and supporting modes with lower GHG emissions, such as rail and bikes. Effective pricing of curbside zones would encourage vehicles to load and vacate the space quickly, making it available for the next user. This would reduce greenhouse gas emissions due to circling and reduce congestion caused by double-parking. Curbside management could also be used to directly encourage the transition to zero emissions vehicles by offering preferential access to the zones. APPENDIX A PAGE 12 OF 20 New Action Next Department vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) Next Step Report back to ENG, PDS Council on progress. Target Q3 2020. New Action Report back to ENG, PDS, Council in Q2 DBL of 2020. 10 gory Flertrir. Charging Network Increase the public charging network for electric vehicles and other needs, such as film and food trucks. Accelerated Action Neighbourhood Charging: Develop a neighbourhood charging strategy for vehicles and electric bikes, with a focus on providing charging in areas of the city where residents do not have access to off-street home charging. Possible locations include on -street (including light -pole charging), and lower -use parking areas, such as parks and schools, particularly where overnight access is possible. The neighbourhood charging strategy would also help provide charging options for shared mobility companies helping to accelerate their transition to zero emissions vehicles. Film, Food Trucks and Special Events: Develop a power supply plan for film, food trucks, and special events to help them transition off of diesel and propane generators, which are also significant contributors to noise and air pollution. Installing power drops for filming at Larwill Park will be one quick -start action. A capital project is currently underway to develop improvements to the public charging network as part of the Electric Vehicle Ecosystem Strategy. The Larwill Park initiative will be funded by the existing capital program. To help finance additional power drops at key areas, staff will implement a diesel generator permit for film and special events. c. Commercial Buildings: Update electric -vehicle readiness requirements for new commercial buildings to close a gap for workplace charging and other commercial uses. In recognition of the range of uses for commercial buildings and parking, the requirements will be based on a points system (similar to the City's TDM approach), where developers can choose from a menu of EV -readiness options. APPENDIX A PAGE 13 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) Access to home charging is considered a key enabler for electric vehicle uptake. It also reduces reliance on higher - powered, short-term public charging that is necessarily more expensive to use and operate. For the thousands of Vancouver residents without access to off-street parking, including many renters, this strategy will seek to enable access to convenient, more equitable near -home charging. By enabling film operations, food trucks and special events to connect to the grid at key areas, such as frequent filming locations and farmers markets, they can reduce their reliance on diesel and propane use. These actions also help to reduce local air pollution and noise. For many EV drivers, the ability to charge a vehicle at work will allow them to transition to an EV, either by extending their range for long commutes or by having access to charging when not available at their home parking spot. Next Step New Action Next Step Report back to Council in Q2 of 2020 with completed strategy. Early actions to also be included for consideration in service planning for 2020. Report back to Council in Q2 of 2020 with completed plan. Early actions to also be included for consideration in service planning for 2020. Report back to Council in Q1 2020. ENG, PDS ENG, PDS PDS, DBL, ENG APPENDIX A PAGE 14 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Category Accelerated Action Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) d. Fast -Charging Network: Complete phase 1 of the City's DC A 10 -minute drive to a fast- Next Step Selection of ENG, PDS fast -charging network for electric vehicles by end of 2020, charging hub, located at a vendor. instead of 2021. This will put a fast -charging hub within a 10- convenient amenity, was minute drive of anywhere in the City. rated by a majority of Vancouver residents as a solution that would make it more likely for them to switch to an electric vehicle. e. Home Charging in Rental Buildings: Explore options to Access to home charging is a Next Step For PDS encourage the installation of home charging in existing key enabler for switching to consideration buildings, with a focus on rental buildings and non -market electric vehicles. Renters in service housing, which have not been as well supported as stratas by face a significant barrier to planning for existing provincial government programs. Options to explore adding home charging if their 2020. include providing a top -up to the Government of BC's building is not already CleanBC incentives, which were expanded in the 2019 equipped with charging provincial budget. infrastructure, and cost has been flagged as the greatest barrier to adding charging in multi -family buildings. f. Electric Tour Buses: Provide charging service for electric Private medium- and heavy- Next Step Request for ENG, PDS tour buses as a pilot project at up to three locations in duty vehicles are a significant expressions of 2019/2020. This would build on the site identification work part of transportation interest for site already completed, and provide a clear path to getting priority emissions, and also access. sites up and running to be responsive to industry leaders and significant contributors to help inform the freight and fleets strategy. Access to the local air pollution. Central charging locations would be determined through a market parking and charging process. A capital project is currently underway to develop opportunities help reduce the improvements to the public charging network as part of the barriers for tour bus Electric Vehicle Ecosystem Strategy. The Electric Tour Buses operators, who may lose half initiative will be funded by the existing capital program. their range by charging out of the city and driving in. 11 Electric Vehicle a. Parking for Zero Emissions Car -Share Vehicles: Update Encourages shift to electric Next Step Report back to ENG, PDS Incentives the Transportation Demand Management requirements in the vehicles and other Council by Q2 Implement Parking Bylaw to: 1) require all new car -share vehicles to be sustainable modes of 2020. incentives to zero emissions with dedicated level 2 charging if electric, and transportation. accelerate the 2) include points for micro -mobility charging including e -bikes. APPENDIX A PAGE 15 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department L;ategory Acceieratea Action t;aroon F'onution VS. Next Jtep milestone Leaa S transition to b. Car Share Parking Rates: For zero emissions vehicles, waive Encourages shift to electric New Action Report back to ENG, PDS electric the fee for permits issued to car -share organizations that allow vehicles. Council by Q2 vehicles. those vehicles to park in areas restricted to residents -only 2020. parking. Waivers granted would expire in five years subject to an evaluation of the incentive. 12 Solid Waste a. Reducing Wasted Food: Identify and pursue opportunities to The production, processing Next Step Identified ENG Reduce solid advance community actions to reduce wasted food across and movement of food results opportunities waste and use it Vancouver, in partnership with local food businesses and food in carbon emissions. By to be to reduce fossil industry, with a dual focus to avoid wasted food in the supply reducing the amount of considered as fuel use. chain and divert surplus food to people. wasted food, those food- part of service related emissions can also be planning for reduced. 2020. b. Renewable Gas Supply: Assess the business case of Renewable natural gas can Next Step Complete ENG converting waste organic materials into renewable natural gas be directly substituted for business case at the Vancouver Landfill. This would be additional to the fossil natural gas, which analysis by project the City is already advancing with FortisBC to upgrade eliminates the carbon 2019 year-end. landfill gas into renewable natural gas. emissions associated with extracting, processing, transmitting and combusting the fossil gas. c. Construction and Demolition Waste: Explore the business Construction and demolition Next Step Complete ENG case of producing a biofuel from waste construction and waste can be processed into business case demolition materials received at the Vancouver Landfill, which a biofuel, thereby reducing analysis by could potentially be used to replace coal for the local the emissions associated with 2019 year-end. production of cement. mining, transporting and burning coal, for example. d. Recycled asphalt and aggregate: Explore the business case By increasing the proportion Next Step Complete ENG of investing in existing infrastructure to enable an increased of recycled asphalt and business case proportion of recycled asphalt and aggregates in City aggregates in City projects, analysis by construction projects. we can reduce the need for 2019 year-end. new asphalt and aggregate and the emissions associated with producing it. APPENDIX A PAGE 16 OF 20 Category Accelerated Action How this Action Reduces Carbon Pollution New Action vs. Next Step Next Milestone Department Lead(s) 13 Food and a. Restaurants and Breweries: Engage with local restaurants Carbon emissions would be New Action Report back PDS, DBL, Beverage and breweries to help reduce emissions and transition to reduced by transitioning off of with action ENG Reduce renewable energy. The project will work with the food and fossil natural gas and plan by end of emissions from beverage industry to explore their options to reduce their propane to solutions such as 2019. Vancouver's emissions, as well as the possible roles that businesses and renewable natural gas, food and the City can play to accelerate change. Areas of interest induction stoves, heat pump beverage include alternatives to standard cooking facilities and patio water heaters, electric patio industry. heaters. heaters and blankets. b. Diets that are Healthy for People and the Planet: Convene In Vancouver, 20% of New Action Begin PDS, ACCS a Solutions Lab to accelerate movement toward diets that are consumption -based carbon convening healthy for people and the planet. The Solutions Lab will bring emissions come from food Solutions Lab together City staff, partners, and community members to (EcoCity Footprint Tool Pilot), in Q2 2019. understand a complex challenge and rapidly prototype and therefore food can play an Report back test solutions. Staff will also investigate the City's potential role important role in taking with potential in supporting emissions reduction from the food system and climate action. Given that actions for identify best practices for ensuring that policy approaches are limited food production consideration equity -based. occurs within city limits, the in Q1 2020. City's role in supporting food system emissions reduction will likely focus on residents' eating habits and institutional food provision. 14 City Leadership a. Facilities Capital Maintenance: The City is working towards The City owns and operates Next Step Ongoing REFM, PDS Updating the all City buildings having 100% renewable energy and 100% more than 600 buildings and annual City's Green reduction in carbon emissions by 2040. All new City -owned when a major upgrade is reporting. Operations Plan buildings are being built to zero emissions standards (since required for a boiler, furnace, to reflect the 2018). Going forward, all capital maintenance projects on or domestic hot water heaters urgency of the energy using equipment in City buildings will transition from it is proposed that zero climate gas to high efficiency electric options where viable. As part of emissions solutions are used, emergency. this work, several additional gas -to -electric heat pump projects subject to meeting will be completed in 2019/2020. operational requirements. This action will address carbon reduction opportunities in existing buildings. Accelerated Action Embodied Carbon: Adopt a strategy that all new City facilities will explore opportunities for significant reductions in embodied emissions. To support this strategy, staff will continue to develop capacity and metrics, and create simple tools for decision-making and reporting. Staff will also work with private, public and non-profit sector partners to build awareness and encourage leadership commitments in this emerging opportunity. c. City Fleet: By 2023, transition all non -emergency City fleet sedans to zero emissions vehicles, replace an additional batch of heavy-duty trucks with electric vehicles, and support additional operational improvements using GPS and telematics. d. Fleet Charging: Develop a charging infrastructure strategy for the City's electric vehicles to support the accelerated sedan transition and the addition of medium- and heavy-duty electric vehicles to the fleet. Manitoba Works Yard Energy Hub: As part of the planning process for the redevelopment of the Manitoba Works Yard, set an objective of establishing the yard as a renewable energy hub for the community. This could include solar PV electricity generation, generation of RNG from organic waste, and EV charging and RNG/HDRD refueling for City vehicles and private fleets and vehicles. APPENDIX A PAGE 17 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) By shifting materials and construction practices for new buildings to lower -carbon options, the City will be able to reduce the embodied carbon it is responsible for and help private, public and non-profit sector partners achieve similar outcomes. The identified City fleet projects would reduce carbon pollution by reducing the overall volume of fossil fuels used. It is likely this would be on the order of 1,500 tonnes of CO2e. To support the planned transition to electric, a comprehensive charging strategy will allow for effective and efficient installation of the required charging infrastructure. Establishing a renewable energy hub would support quicker transition of the City and private fleets to renewable sources, while also increasing demand, driving further maturation of the local market for these energy technologies. New Action Next Step Next Step New Action Embodied carbon policy defined and included in all City -owned facilities development 2019/20. Detailed analysis will be considered as part of service planning for 2020. For consideration as part of service planning for 2020. Detailed plan as part of 2019-2023 Manitoba Works Yard Master Plan. REFM, PDS ENG ENG REFM, ENG Accelerated Action APPENDIX A PAGE 18 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Carbon Pollution vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) f. Small Equipment: Develop a strategy to transition small A transition of small mobile New Action mobile equipment (e.g., mowers and leaf blowers) to electric equipment to electric has the or zero emissions technologies. Use that experience to potential to reduce emissions consider city-wide approaches to phase out fossil fuels in that by 800 tonnes of CO2e. equipment. Sustainable Commuting: Update the Sustainable Commuting Program to accelerate long-term shifts towards City staff commuting by walking, cycling, transit, or zero emissions vehicles. A secondary objective will be to provide a leading standard for City facilities as an example to other employers and commercial landlords in Vancouver. The first phase of work will focus on policies to enhance City employee electric vehicle charging and bicycle end -of -trip facilities at City buildings. A second phase will include a comprehensive review of the City's Sustainable Commuting Program and identify additional actions beyond end -of -trip facilities that will accelerate a shift to zero -carbon commuting. Online Services: Explore all available options to provide services online in order to reduce the number of trips that applicants need to make to the Development and Building Services Centre. As a leading employer, the City can both enable our own employees to switch to zero emissions options for commuting, as well as influence other employers in applying best practices to encourage zero emissions commuting. Active transportation, transit, electric vehicles and telecommuting all reduce commuting carbon emissions relative to a commute via an internal combustion private vehicle. The City receives about 45,000 in-person visits a year to the Development and Building Services Centre at 525 W 12th Avenue. Moving more services online helps to reduce the carbon footprint of these trips. In addition, most applicants need to provide multiple printed copies of site plans and construction plans. Moving to online plan submission and review has a further benefit in reducing paper use. Next Step Next Step For consideration as part of service planning for 2020. Complete project charter in Q2 2019; develop first phase of policy by Q3 2019. Develop detailed implementation plans for online service delivery. ENG PDS, REFM, ENG, HR DBL, IT APPENDIX A PAGE 19 OF 20 Category Accelerated Action How this Action Reduces Carbon Pollution New Action Next Department vs. Next Step Milestone Lead(s) i. Support for Cities in Developing Countries: Explore options Cities in developing countries Report back to PDS, CMO, to help cities in developing countries grow their economies often do not have the Council on VEC without relying on fossil fuels to the extent that Canada and financial resources and options by end other developed countries have. Options could include technical knowledge needed of 2020. contributing to the UNFCCC's Green Climate Fund, partnering to rapidly transition to with specific cities in developing countries to support transition renewable energy and adapt to renewable energy, advocating for increased federal and/or to climate change, while also private sector contributions, etc. growing their economy. By providing support, wealthier jurisdictions that have long benefited from fossil fuels can help them achieve those objectives. 15 Intergovernment a. Intergovernmental Relations: Develop a list of policy, As discussed in the report, Next Step Report back to CMO, PDS, al Relations and legislative, and regulatory changes and investment funding the City has a number of Council on ENG Community priorities (coordinated with other City corporate priorities) to important tools it can use to recommended Engagement work with other governments and related organizations in reduce carbon pollution. priorities by order to implement and support the City's climate emergency However, achieving the City's June 2019. work. These include the federal and provincial governments; objectives will rely on a Metro Vancouver; other municipal governments across BC, broader set of tools that Canada and internationally; FCM; UBCM; TransLink; Port of require senior levels of Vancouver; BC Hydro; and FortisBC. Examples of these government, the region, and changes and priorities include mobility pricing (as a tool to limit utilities moving in similar congestion and raise funds for transit), right -to -charge rules for directions. electric vehicle owners in multi -unit residential buildings, ride - hailing legislation that aligns with zero emissions principles and complements sustainable travel, supporting the All On Board campaign, accelerated transit electrification, a bold vision for the Regional Transportation Strategy, energy performance benchmarking for buildings, counting district energy systems with heat from renewable energy as a contributor towards the targets in BC's new renewable gas standard, and electricity pricing that supports electrification. Acceieratea Action �. Community Engagement: Develop and implement an action - oriented community education and awareness strategy to increase residents' literacy on the urgency of climate change, local impacts, and opportunities for individual and collective action. Working with community partners, local businesses, and stakeholders, examples could include campaigns, strategic communication on City assets (fleet and buildings), presence at community events, side events during relevant local conferences—with an emphasis on those groups who are typically harder to engage, including youth and new Canadians. c. Partner Engagement: Develop and implement a strategy to further build relationships and expand engagement and collaboration with diverse groups involved in advancing climate action in Vancouver. Examples could include further developing the annual Renewable City stakeholder event, supporting program ambassadors, managing existing and initiating new topic -specific working groups, and coordinating collaboration between partner organizations working toward priority outcomes. APPENDIX A PAGE 20 OF 20 How this Action Reduces New Action Next Department Maroon rouution Based on research conducted by Mustel Group in 2017 and 2018, the City has an opportunity, through trusted partners, to educate on the types of renewable energy, to engage on opportunities to take action, and to address specific concerns and uncertainties voiced by those who participated in the research. This will not only build continued support for climate - related policy and City action, but is foundational for resident action. With dedicated capacity and a focused strategy, the City can better coordinate and leverage the efforts of partner organizations. This type of joint action will be essential in successfully delivering many of the actions outlined in this Vs. Next Next Step Next Step muestone Complete hiring of new staff and develop strategy. Complete hiring of new staff and develop strategy. PDS, CEC, VEC PDS, VEC APPENDIX B PAGE 1 OF 2 Appendix B — Adaptation Actions The adaptation actions in the following table were identified through the process of preparing the climate emergency response. Action Description How this Actions Supports Adaptation Next Milestone Pilot clean air In the summer of 2019, City staff will Between 2015 and 2017 there were 27 days of air Report back to Council with shelters collaborate to provide "clean air rooms" in up to quality alerts issued for the Lower Mainland due to pilot results and next steps. five (5) cooling centres. Portable HEPA filters— particulate matter from wildfires burning outside the the VCH recommended filtration level—will be region and from ground -level ozone. The summer of used in designated areas and rooms to provide 2018 also included several extended air quality alerts. refuge for the public during extended daytime Exposure to ozone and fine particulate matter is hours during poor air quality days. Level of particularly a concern for infants, the elderly and those use, challenges and lessons will be evaluated who have underlying medical conditions, such as lung to inform a more permanent program. disease, heart disease, diabetes or asthma. Feedback from frontline staff throughout the city suggests addressing this impact from climate change is a priority in the short term. This action targets those most vulnerable to poor air quality. Temporary Provide temporary cooling measures during As summers have been getting hotter, it is widely See below cooling in non- summer heat to the non -market housing recognized that older buildings and certain building market buildings identified as overheating during the designs do not cool down well at night and thermal housing last few summers. comfort during the day declines. In Vancouver, a high proportion of vulnerable people reside in areas identified as urban heat islands, and many live in older, poorly ventilated buildings. In 2018, temporary cooling was provided in four cooling rooms in City -owned non -market housing buildings that were found to be overheating. This summer, the effort will be expanded to up to six sites and to provide better cooling results. APPENDIX B PAGE 2OF2 Action Description How this Actions Supports Adaptation Next Milestone Long-term Recognizing the limitations and costliness of Investing in cooling (whether passive or active) where Report back to Council with cooling of non- continued temporary cooling in non -market populations most vulnerable to heat illness are identified study recommendations and market housing, REFM and Non -market Housing is a priority step in managing climate change impacts. related actions. housing Operations (ACCS) are collaborating to investigate options to provide long-term cooling for non -market housing buildings prone to over -heating. A consultant study of specific sites will be undertaken to recommend actions. Amendment to Provide an amendment to existing tree pits in The soil amendment will provide improved drought and Report back to Council with existing street locations around the city to improve drought pest tolerance for street trees as well as improving tree results and next steps. trees and pest tolerance. health generally. With warmer winters and summers, increasing pests are anticipated. Hotter summers are already putting stress on our trees. The GCAP goal of increasing tree canopy in the city is important for mitigating urban heat island effect, which is worsening with hotter weather, and also for stormwater benefits. APPENDIX C PAGE 1OF1 Appendix C — Other Climate Emergency Declarations Examples of other cities and regions that have declared climate emergencies include: • In BC: Richmond, New Westminster, Victoria, the Capital Regional District, the Islands Trust Area, and Powell River. • The BC Assembly of First Nations also passed a motion recognizing the climate change emergency in March 2019. • Across Canada, the list includes Halifax, Mahone Bay, Moncton, Sackville (NB), Edmundston, Kingston, and Hamilton, and in Quebec there are over 200 communities including Quebec City and Montreal. • International cities include London, Edinburgh, Los Angeles, Berkeley, and Oakland. APPENDIX D PAGE 1 OF 1 Appendix D — CleanBC Commitments with Greatest Relevance for Vancouver The policies and investments in phase one of BC's new climate plan (CleanBC) that are of greatest relevance to Vancouver include: • A zero emissions vehicle standard that will require an increasing percentage of the light- duty vehicles sold in BC to be zero emissions. The specific targets are 10 per cent of sales by 2025, 30 per cent of sales by 2030, and 100 per cent of sales by 2040. The policy will ensure that there are more electric vehicles available when residents and businesses are ready to purchase a new vehicle. • A strengthened Low -Carbon Fuel Standard, which will require the carbon intensity of transportation fuels of 20 per cent below 2010 levels by 2030. The current requirement is 10 per cent below 2010 levels by 2020. This policy will support the transition to electric vehicles and increase the supply of renewable diesel and gasoline. • A renewable gas standard that will require 15 per cent of FortisBC's gas supply to come from renewable sources by 2030 (there is currently less than one per cent renewable content in the gas grid). This policy will help reduce carbon pollution from buildings and some transportation in the city, and will help advance renewable natural gas supply projects. • The 2019 provincial budget included $902 million to support the implementation of CleanBC from 2019 through 2021. This includes new funding for electric vehicles and charging infrastructure, heat pumps, and building energy efficiency upgrades. In addition to these provincial actions, the federal government has been in the process of implementing several important climate policies of its own through the Pan -Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change. These include the Carbon Pollution Pricing Benchmark, the Clean Fuel Standard and the Coal -Fired Power Phase -Out. All of these policies will help Canada reduce emissions, but in a BC context, they are largely overlapping with provincial climate policies. APPENDIX E PAGE 1 OF 2 Appendix E — Multiple Benefits of Reducing Carbon Pollution Health and air quality benefits The vast majority of solutions the City is pursuing to reduce carbon pollution also lead to better health outcomes. Zero emissions buildings have better indoor air quality. Electric vehicles produce less air pollution than their gasoline and diesel counterparts. Walking and cycling are pollution -free and they help people stay active. Improved resilience Many of the solutions that help to reduce carbon pollution also help residents and businesses become more resilient. A zero emissions building provides a good example: in addition to emitting no carbon pollution, the improved ventilation helps limit air quality impacts from forest fire smoke, and high levels of insulation mean that it can stay comfortable in hot or cold weather in the event of a power outage and more extreme weather events. A second example is a resilient transportation network, which provides a range of mobility options that can meet diverse daily needs and respond to and recover from changing circumstances. Reduced costs The costs of reducing emissions fast enough to limit warming to 1.5°C are much less than the costs that will be incurred if more warming is allowed to happen. That said, it is understandable that many residents and businesses are focused on more immediate cost implications to them as individuals. In some cases, those solutions already represent a net savings for Vancouver residents and businesses (e.g., improved energy efficiency requirements in new buildings, and safer and more convenient active transportation and transit choices). In other cases, there are currently cost premiums that most residents will not recover through energy savings (e.g., electric vehicles and heat pumps). In these cases, the City (and governments more generally) can play an important role of helping to make those solutions more affordable in the near term and building demand for them so that costs come down. Based on economic modelling the City commissioned with BC Hydro in 2017, the transition to 100 per cent renewable energy can help achieve modest cost savings for residents and businesses. For example, average per capita expenditures on energy and the associated capital equipment decline by nine per cent between 2015 and 2050. Economic development Going "green" is good for business and great for the local economy. This can be measured in a variety of ways, including job creation, job transition, innovation, process efficiencies, increased sales/revenues, etc. In Vancouver, the green economy employs 1 in 15 workers, well above any other North American city and this is growing at 7.8% per year on average for the past three years. The carbon intensity of Vancouver's economy (tonnes of carbon pollution per dollar of GDP) has fallen by 29 per cent since 2007. Establishing effective policies that address climate change can accelerate innovation in cleantech, green building technologies, advanced materials, local food, solid waste and transportation options. When Vancouver City Council passed the Zero Emissions Building Plan and the Government of BC established the BC Energy Step Code for new construction, the Vancouver Economic Commission (VEC) identified a $3.3 billion market opportunity for the local green building and construction sector over the next decade. APPENDIX E PAGE 2OF2 The environmental ethos and world-renowned recognition of Vancouver as a "green" city has also translated into a US$31.7 billion brand. In a global economy where cities are competing for talent, this is an important quality and advantage that Vancouver possesses to help it attract the best and brightest to Vancouver's thriving economy in all sectors. APPENDIX F PAGE 1 OF 2 Appendix F — Regulatory, Investment and Advocacy Tools to Reduce Carbon Pollution The following table lists the primary regulatory and investment tools (with examples) that Vancouver can use to reduce carbon pollution. Advocacy tools are discussed below the table. Tool Examples Land -use planning • Designing complete and compact communities that allow people to live close to transit and other services and amenities Allocating public space • Widening sidewalks • Creating parks and plazas • Dedicating road space for transit • Reserving parking for electric vehicles • Creating protected bike lanes Regulating buildings and • Limiting carbon emissions in new construction equipment • Adding electric -vehicle readiness requirements in new construction • Supporting transportation demand management requirements in new construction Investing in infrastructure • Improving walking and cycling networks • Increasing public electric vehicle chargers Supplying renewable • Developing and expanding the Neighbourhood Energy energy Utility • Providing landfill gas for heat and power generation Providing financial and • Topping up Government of BC incentives for heat pumps land -use incentives • Incentivizing carbon reductions in heritage homes • Allowing buildings that are taller or have bigger footprints in exchange for higher environmental performance • Pricing curb space to manage parking demand and reduce congestion Capacity building • Partnering with institutional and professional organizations to provide skills training • Establishing the Zero Emissions Buildings Centre of Excellence Demonstrating corporate • Transitioning the City's fleet to electric vehicles and leadership renewable fuels • Heating the City's buildings with heat pumps and renewable energy sources APPENDIX F PAGE 2OF2 Advocacy Tools In addition to the regulatory and investment tools that the City directly controls, we can also work with other governments and utilities to use their tools to pursue shared climate objectives. Climate change is too big of a problem to be tackled without close collaboration and learning from other jurisdictions. Examples include: • The Government of BC's jurisdiction includes critical policies, such as requirements for the percentage of renewable energy in the gas and electric grids. The City continues to actively work with the Government of BC on the development and implementation of its climate plan (CleanBC). • The amount of renewable energy supplied by BC Hydro and FortisBC, and the rate structures they set to connect to and use their energy influences the business cases for switching to renewable energy, such as electric vehicles, heat pumps and renewable natural gas. Metro Vancouver, TransLink and neighbouring local governments have similar tools to Vancouver that can help transform regional markets that make it easier for Vancouver to achieve its targets (e.g., the broader adoption of EV -readiness requirements in new construction will help accelerate EV adoption across the region). Updating transit fare policy and providing additional transit service region -wide can support Vancouver's sustainable transportation goals. • Vancouver is also an active member in a number of regional, national and international networks of cities working collaboratively to reduce carbon emissions. Examples include the Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM) and Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), the EV Peer Network, the BC Energy Step Code Peer Network, Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance, C40 Cities, and 100 Resilient Cities. APPENDIX G PAGE 1 OF 2 Appendix G — Carbon Budgeting Objectives Improved Transparency A carbon budget should be accessible to the public. It should show: • The components ("sub -budgets") that add up to the overall budget (e.g., energy use reductions in buildings, transportation; waste management). • The links to anticipated carbon reductions. • The links to financial budgets to show that they are funded. • The City departments responsible for development and implementation. • Any remaining carbon reductions necessary to achieve targets, but not currently attributable. How targets for the "sub -budgets" are equitably set, and mechanisms for rebalancing between them if necessary, remains a question. Cost-effective, impactful technologies and reduction pathways may be available to different sectors and departments at different times. There is also the issue of evaluating program efficacy. Initiatives with manifold or indirect effects may be especially complicated, and the ability to measure, estimate, or forecast carbon impacts varies greatly. Other considerations include delayed carbon reduction impacts and the permanence of those impacts. In these instances where the carbon impact may not be clear, secondary metrics within a forthcoming indicators framework for the Renewable City Action Plan can help track progress. Finally, any gaps between indicated components and reduction targets will inform additional carbon reduction or removal programs as required to meet the budget targets. Underpinning all of these is the need to improve data quality. Better Data The carbon budget should track our emissions with enough accuracy and precision to properly assess our progress. Better data helps us better determine whether we have the right current and planned measures to achieve our targets. Calculating Vancouver's community emissions to date has relied on estimates, which has been enough to show overall trends in total emissions. A carbon budget requires more detailed, "policy -sensitive" data to show clear links between program impacts and measured emissions. As an example, reported transportation emissions have relied partially on fuel -sales data. This can show an overall trend in vehicle activity, but it is influenced by too many external factors to directly show the impact of Vancouver's progress of mode split, resident vehicle -distances driven, and active transportation initiatives. Another example is methane emissions from the natural gas distribution system and the Vancouver Landfill. A number of studies have pointed to scientific uncertainty regarding the amount of methane released from these sources, and efforts to reduce that uncertainty help the City make better decisions about programs and policies. APPENDIX G PAGE 2OF2 Better Forecasting The carbon budget should allow us to forecast emissions with reasonable confidence, and course -correct as necessary. Better data also allows improved forecasting for future budgets. Budget levels should be adjusted as progress is made (or not), as costs and availability of carbon -reduction and removal technologies change, and as global climate projections are updated. Regular budget -adjustment milestones should be set: four-year periods would align with Council terms and fulfil Council's directive to "create interim four-year targets and goals". CleanBC Alignment The carbon budget should align with the Government of BC's CleanBC plan where appropriate. A new CleanBC accountability framework is currently in development. The CleanBC report mentions carbon budgets with respect to maintaining a "commitment to transparency on use of carbon tax revenue", undertaking an "independent review of proposed climate action against climate budgets", and tabling "an annual report of GHG spending, program results and anticipated reductions in GHG emissions". These all point to similar objectives around transparency already discussed above. Vancouver's data analysis and forecasting approaches can align where possible with provincial approaches, to ensure similar measures are accounted for, as long as carbon measurements continue to be policy -sensitive at the city level. Improved Accountability The carbon budget should enable some mechanism for addressing exceedances. Targets may be missed. Carbon budgeting approaches can help drive analysis into the causes of exceedance, which drives the development of ways to address them. Tracking carbon expenditures within a budget also allows accounting processes to be applied, such as the ability to carry forward budget surpluses to future years, to borrow surplus "room" if overspent, or to accrue carbon -removal impacts to the years they actually come into effect. Frequent budget reporting (Council direction is for annual reporting) decreases the risk of complacency and delayed action. Likewise, accountability can lead to the notion of carbon "debt": if a carbon budget is missed in one year, does that incur a deficit that should be addressed in the following year? Meanwhile, at this time, no common approach exists for consequences. For example, New Zealand's Emissions Trading Scheme allows exceedances to be offset with carbon removals. The District of Saanich's Carbon Fund makes departments accountable by requiring them to pay into a fund for corporate -emissions reduction projects, based on their emissions levels. Staff will continue to research and develop an approach in consultation with City departments. APPENDIX H PAGE 1 OF 1 Appendix H — Carbon and Equity Working Group Objectives and Process The objectives of Vancouver's Climate and Equity Work Group will be to: 1. Help City staff to better centre the voices of Vancouver black, Indigenous, and people of colour in climate and sustainability work, and to understand systemic discrimination and climate -related risks faced by low-income residents. 2. Review proposed Greenest City 2050 actions over a number of goal areas, including this Climate Emergency Response, to identify potential impacts (positive and negative) and opportunities where implementation could benefit systemically excluded populations. 3. Propose new relevant actions to be considered for inclusion in climate plans, including the City's Climate Change Adaptation Strategy. An ancillary objective of the Climate and Equity Working Group will be to serve as a potential model for meaningfully engaging with black, Indigenous, and people of colour, as well as low- income communities, using the tools and guidance provided by the City's Equity Framework. The Climate and Equity Working Group will be a learning experience and one that could build trust and capacity for other City -led initiatives. It will also be an important opportunity to incorporate a gendered intersectional lens into the City's climate actions and the Climate Adaptation Strategy. In terms of process, it is anticipated that the Climate and Equity Working Group participants will attend a series of 2-3 hour workshops over the course of 12-18 months, starting in the fall of 2019. To avoid power imbalance, the workshops will be facilitated by a non -City staff person with a depth of experience in equity. The workshops will be organized and attended by staff from Sustainability working in collaboration with Social Policy. Other City staff will attend based on the topic area of discussion at each meeting. The working structure of the group will be co -created with working group participants, to ensure that it delivers meaningful outcomes while building trust amongst participants and City staff. Participants The group will consist of 10-15 representatives from local community-based organizations (or their citizen designates). An intersectional approach will be used. The working group will include Indigenous representation and the City will strive to include a diversity of racial and ethnic backgrounds, ages, gender identities, and sexual orientations. The City will strive to ensure the group has a majority of black, Indigenous, and people of colour among participants. Applicants who identify as black, Indigenous, people of colour, and LGBTQ2S+ who may also identify as gender non -binary will be strongly encouraged to apply. A public call for applications for organizations that are willing to participate will be made. Budget The proposed budget to create the Climate and Equity Working Group is $50,000, which will cover up to eight workshops with an external facilitator and includes compensation for working group participants at Vancouver's living wage, provision of childcare during meetings, and transportation costs. The proposed budget would also enable the facilitator to do a high-level scan of the City's climate and sustainability plans (e.g., GCAP 2020) to identify equity gaps and opportunities. Staff have identified funding for the creation of this group from within existing budgets and may bring back a budget proposal for an ongoing working group for Council's consideration. Climate Emergency Response I City of Vancouver # VanClimateAction Page 1 of 3 Climate Emergency Response On April 29, Vancouver City Council approved the Climate Emergency Response report PDFfile (609 KB) to increase our efforts to tackle climate change. The report amplifies and builds on past progress to reduce carbon pollution, improve energy efficiency, and transition to renewable energy. Climate Emergency Response report The report contains big moves to reduce Vancouver's carbon pollution by building and expanding on our existing workto fight climate change. As well, it contains accelerated actions that will help us ramp -up local action right away. Six big moves Read the Climate Emergency Response infographic PDFfile (395 KB) The six big moves will reduce Vancouver's carbon pollution by building on and expanding on our existing work to fight climate change. 1. Walkable complete communities By 2030,90% of people live within an easy walk and roll of their daily needs. 2. Safe and convenient active transportation and transit'' By 2030, two thirds of trips in Vancouver will be by active transportation and transit. F. https://vancouver.ca/green-vancouver/climate-emergency-response.aspx 6/20/2019 Climate Emergency Response I City of Vancouver Page 2 of 3 3. Pollution free cars, trucks and buses U-0 O.a By 2030, 50% of the kilometres driven on Vancouver's roads will be by zero emissions vehicles. 4. Zero emission space and water heating By 2025, all new and replacement heating and hot water systems will be zero emissions. g> S. Lower carbon construction By 2030, the embodied emissions from new buildings and construction projects will be reduced by 40% compared to a 2018 baseline. 6. Restored forests and coast 40 4b By fall 2020, to develop "negative emission" targets that can be achieved by restoring forest and coastal ecosystems. 53 accelerated actions Thereport includes 53 accelerated actions to help us ramp -up our local action right away. Examples of the accelerated actions: Make it more affordable and easier to get a permit for heat pumps Transition the Neighbourhood Energy Utility from 70% (today) to 100% renewable energy before 2030 Develop a power supply plan for film, food trucks, and special events to help them transition off of diesel and propane generators, which are also significant contributors to noise and air pollution Vancouver declares climate emergency Vancouver is joining hundreds of cities around the world in declaring a climate emergency and committing to reduce emissions locally. Buildings and transportation emit over 95% of the carbon pollution in Vancouver. That is why we are investing in new infrastructure, transitioning to cleaner sources of energy, and changing the waywe plan and design our neighbourhoods and buildings. We have a solid foundation to build from, which includes developing climate action policies since the 1990's and a commitment to eliminate our dependency on fossil fuels and transition to renewable energy before 2050. Why we need to accelerate climate action When Canada signed the Paris Agreement in 2015, we joined a global commitment to keep global warming below 2°C, and as close to 1.5°C as possible. In October 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) External web site, opens in new tab released a major report making a case to strive for 1.5oC. Every degree of warming beyond this threshold will lead to increased risks of extreme weather, more wildfires and floods, and increases in sea level rise. If we fail to limit these impacts, climate change will be a threat to global stability. https:Hvancouver.ca/green-vancouver/climate-emergency-response.aspx 6/20/2019 Climate Emergency Response I City of Vancouver Climate action is for everybody We're forming an Equity Working Group to ensure that equity has a central place in the City's climate emergency and sustainability work moving forward. Documents and related projects Documents Climate Emergency Response frequently asked questions PDFfile (142 KB) Climate Emergency Response - Council amendments PDF file (56 KB) Climate Emergency Response report (as presented to Council) PDFfile (609 KB) Council presentation (April 24, 2019) PDFfi/e (1.7 MB) Related projects Renewable City Action Plan, our commitment to a clean energy future Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, we're already preparing for the impacts of climate change Get news on our progress, programs, and initiatives. ® w You'll also be notified of local sustainability events and volunteer opportunities. Email: Name: * Indicates required fields View past newsletters: Jun 2019 1 May 2019 View privacy policy Page 3 of 3 https://vancouver.ca/green-vancouver/climate-emergency-response.aspx 6/20/2019 Item Number: 3. lot CITY OC IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 20, 2019 Memo from City Manager: Trap Neuter Return Community Cats/Pet Shops and Puppies ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo from City Manager: Trap Neuter Return Community Cats/Pet Shops and Puppies � r�x 2101t CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: June 13, 2019 To: Mayor and City Council From: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Re: Trap Neuter Return Community Cats/ Pet Shops and Puppies At the May 7t" City Council meeting, it was requested that staff provide background and recommendations on (1) a trap/neuter/return program for community cats, and (2) regulation on where local pet shops can source the dogs that they have for sale to the public. TRAP NEUTER RETURN COMMUNITY CATS Feral cats have been a long time -issue for the City. Feral cats, commonly known as community cats, are brought to the Animal Care and Adoption Center by concerned residents in a humane trap and are held for 5 days. If deemed feral and unsuitable for adoption, the cat is humanely euthanized. In 2018, the Center euthanized 96 otherwise healthy cats and kittens that were feral. Of that 96, the City of Iowa City accounted for about 45 percent of those cats, Johnson County residents another 40 percent, Coralville 14 percent, and University of Iowa and University Heights less than 1 percent. The number of community cats euthanized over the 5 years has decreased. The decrease can probably be attributed to the trap/neuter/return (TNR) movement being implemented by individuals. The average cost of housing a cat for 5 days is $500.00, or $100 per day. About 2 years ago the Center started a "barn cat program". Friends of the Animal Center Foundation will pay for sterilization, ear tip, and rabies vaccine then the Center relocates the cat to a "barn home". Unfortunately, the Center was only able to find 34 barn homes for community cats, which is far less than needed to meet the volume of cats. The antiquated practice of trapping and euthanizing is not effective due to the phenomenon called the vacuum effect. Plentiful resources remain luring other cats to that area allowing them to reproduce which will actually cause a brief spike in the population. Returning sterilized cats back to their original location stabilizes the colony, prevents other cats from joining the colony, and reduces nuisance behaviors associated with intact cats. The most effective method to control community cat populations is trap, neuter, and release (TNR). There are at least 240 local governments nation-wide that have enacted ordinances or polices supporting TNR. Cities in Washington County including Washington, Brighton, and Wellman passed TNR ordinances over 4 years ago and have experienced significant decreases in shelter euthanasia of community cats and complaints relating to them. Locally, Des Moines and Clinton have recently passed a TNR ordinance and the cities of North Liberty and Cedar Rapids are both researching it. Through partnerships with Iowa Humane Alliance and Johnson County Humane Society, the cost is minimal to the Iowa City resident. Community cats would be exempt from the 5 -day hold period eliminating the cost to residents. The individual trapper would directly transport the cats for sterilization surgery and then back to their colony. Iowa Humane Alliance allows any community cat to be dropped off without an appointment and funding is available through Johnson County Humane Society via the Florence Unash Fund. TNR benefits the community by providing a humane and effective alternative to trap and euthanize. Staff will experience less stress from decreased euthanasia rates and will have more June 13, 2019 Page 2 opportunity to dedicate their time to adoptable animals and customer service. The City will save money due to the waived holding period and cost associated with euthanasia. Some residents have asked for a more humane, affordable, and effective approach: TNR provides the solution. PET SHOPS AND PUPPIES In our experience persons who purchase animals though third party sellers may not have reliable and accurate information regarding the origin of the animal. The best practice would be for buyers to be able to visually inspect the animal's parents, determine behavioral concerns, and review records of any genetic testing to ensure an animal's health and temperament. We can only speculate about the unsanitary conditions and neglectful environments that animal may endure when they are primarily used as breeding stock and their offspring are sold to third party sellers. Iowa City Animal Services inspects all pet shops within Iowa City annually and any warnings or citations issued have been remedied and brought up to current code within the recommended time frame. Until the state of Iowa passes stricter laws governing the standards for which companion animals are kept in confinement for breeding purposes, pet shop owners and buyers may not be aware of the potential lifelong health problems or other issues that could incur expensive veterinary bills. Of course, we would prefer that people wanting a new pet would choose to adopt rather than purchase. We will continue to advocate and promote adoption alternatives to the community. We also advocate for stronger state laws governing breeding environments. However, regulating and/or monitoring breeding environments that take place outside our jurisdiction would be very difficult. A complete ban on third party sales would not solve the issue as businesses could locate in nearby communities. Pushing sales outside of the community may also adversely affect those populations without the means and ability to personally visit breeder locations. Staff recommends that we continue to promote adoption over purchase and that we continue to annually inspect and follow-up on any resulting issues that are identified in our local pet shops. CITY OC IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 20, 2019 Memo from City Attorney: Legal authority to require rent disclosure ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo from City Attorney: Legal authority to require rent disclosure City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM - Date: June 15, 2019 To: City Council From: Eleanor M. Dilkes, City Attorney Re: Legal authority to require rent disclosure As requested, this memo will provide a brief explanation of the basis for my opinion that the City does not have the legal authority to require rent disclosure on the City's rental permit application. The City has home rule authority to enact laws "to preserve and improve the peace, safety, health, welfare, comfort and convenience of its residents' Iowa Code Section 364.1(2019). However, those laws must be consistent with state law and the grant of home rule authority "does not include the power to enact private or civil law governing civil relationships, except as incident to an exercise of an independent power." Id. As you know the City regulates extensively to assure that rental properties are safe and healthy and do not create nuisances that are harmful to the neighborhood. The power to do so is at the heart of municipal authority and specifically granted by Iowa law. Section 364.17 of the Iowa Code provides for the adoption and enforcement of housing codes and Section 364.12 specifically provides that the City may require the abatement of nuisances. The City's regulation of rental properties most definitely affects the "civil relationship' between the landlord and tenant. Such regulation is allowable, however, because it is "incident to [the City's] exercise of an independent power," i.e. the power to legislate for the purpose of assuring that rental properties are safe and healthy for the residents and the neighborhood as expressly set forth in Chapter 364 of the Iowa Code. The same cannot be said about a requirement of rent disclosure. While one might argue that the City's desire to collect information about rents being charged is part and parcel of the "health and safety' of the City's rental stock, and thereby an allowable part of a housing code, such an argument is considerably weakened by the state's express preemption of municipal laws "imposing any limitation on the amount of rent that can be charged for leasing private residential or commercial property.' Iowa Code Section 364.3(9) (2019). Please give me a call if you have questions. Cc: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Sue Dulek, First Assistant City Attorney jr ;;rw®J� CITY OC IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 20, 2019 Airport Commission: May 16 ATTACHMENTS: Description Airport Commission: May 16 Item Number: 5. May 16, 2019 Page 1 MINUTES DRAFT IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION MAY 16, 2019 — 6:00 P.M. AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING Members Present: Warren Bishop, Minnetta Gardinier (arrived late), Christopher Lawrence, Robert Libby Members Absent: Derek LaBrie Staff Present: Sue Dulek, Michael Tharp Others Present: Carl Byers, Matt Wolford RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council action): None. DETERMINE QUORUM: The meeting was called to order at 6:04 P.M. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the April 18, 2019, meeting were reviewed by Members. Tharp noted that Dulek gave him one correction. On page 3 of the packet, there is a motion that incorrectly noted that Libby had left the meeting at that point, which he had not. The vote should be a 5-0 vote under the FBO training report section. Bishop moved to accept the minutes of the April 18, 2019, meeting as amended. Lawrence seconded the motion. The motion carried 3-0, Gardinier and LaBrie absent. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: None. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION: a. FAA/IDOT Projects i. Obstruction Mitigation — Tharp reported that they are still gathering temporary easements for the tree removal work. He added that out of 30 packets, they have received 25 back. Of these, Tharp noted that there may be just one problem to contend with. Otherwise this project is moving along well. Tharp and Dulek responded to Member questions regarding this project. ii. Runway 25 Threshold Relocation — Tharp reported that they are finishing up the corrections on the grant update for the FAA. Things are still on schedule with this project, according to Tharp. May 16, 2019 Page 2 b. University Hangar Agreement — i. Public Hearing — Libby opened the public hearing at 6:08pm. Tharp reviewed the agreement, noting that the University already rented hangar 32. Hangar 34 is immediately adjacent to hangar 32. He further explained the arrangement, noting that this will give the Airport some additional revenue. No public comments were received, Libby closed the Public hearing at 6:10pm. ii. Consider a resolution approving a use agreement with University of Iowa for Hangar 32 and 34 — Lawrence moved to approve Resolution #A19-08, approving a use agreement with the University of Iowa for Hangars 32 and 34. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0, LaBrie absent. C. FBO J Flight Training Reports I. Jet Air — Wolford shared the monthly maintenance reports with the Commission. He highlighted some of the tasks, such as mowing, runway 7 repairs, and fuel pump repairs. There have been some issues with the zero -turn mower and Wolford stated that they are looking into this. Continuing, Wolford noted that Jet Air's business is still moving along nicely, with charter flights and aircraft sales taking place. d. Airport Operations I. Management — Tharp gave Members a brief history of the City's purchasing policy, adding that in the past the Airport Commission has adopted this for their operations. He then responded to Member questions regarding this policy. 1. Consider a resolution adopting the City of Iowa City Purchasing Policy Manual — Bishop moved to approve Resolution #19-09, adopting the City of Iowa City Purchasing Policy Manual. Lawrence seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0, LaBrie absent. 2. Viewing Area — Tharp stated that the final touches are getting done here. He noted that he is considering a ribbon cutting for the viewing area on Friday, May 24th. Members discussed whether or not they would be available, due to the holiday weekend. Tharp stated that they could push it to the following Friday if that works better for Members. Members agreed that May 31st would work best, most likely a noon event. ii. Budget — 1. Flight Simulator Room — Tharp gave Members an update on this project. He stated that the company that was brought forward for this might have some delivery issues; therefore, he is not sure if they will be able to fulfill the Airport's request. As for the surveys, Tharp stated that he did receive most of them back. There is definitely interest in the aviation community. Tharp added that they just need to find a company that can deliver what they are wanting. Gardinier asked if this'delivery issue' is a short-term problem, and Tharp stated that the company was originally developed by members of a pilots group. Then a venture May 16, 2019 Page 3 capitalist group bought them out. Since this time, he noted that service, supply, and delivery of the systems has been called into question. Members continued to discuss this issue, with Tharp stating that he will continue to see what companies are out there. Gardinier suggested they find a company willing to let them demo and try out any simulator they might purchase, so they can make sure it's what they truly want. iii. Events — Tharp reminded Members that the car show event will be using the front of the grounds on May 25th and then there is a graduation reception on May 26th. e. Commission Members' Reports — Gardinier stated that she submitted a proposal to give a talk at Air Venture's 90th anniversary celebration of women's air racing. Gardinier then spoke to having a potluck at the Airport next Thursday at 6:00 P.M. f. Staff Report — Tharp stated the University will be hosting an open house highlighting their hangar on June 22nd from 12:00 to 4:00 P.M. Tharp will be out of the office after the ribbon cutting on the 31st. He added that he will be out of the area over the Memorial Day weekend. SET NEXT REGULAR MEETING FOR: The next regular meeting of the Airport Commission will be held on Thursday, June 20, 2019, at 6:00 P.M. in the Airport Terminal Building. Tharp spoke briefly to the Council's appointing new Commission Members, possibly at their upcoming meeting. ADJOURN: Lawrence moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:38 P.M. Bishop seconded the motion. The motion carried 4-0, LaBrie absent. CHAIRPERSON DATE May 16, 2019 Page 4 Airport Commission ATTENDANCE RECORD 2018-2019 Key: X = Present X/E = Present for Part of Meeting O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = Not a Member at this time TERM o 0_0 o W O o 0 0 0 0 NAME EXP. O co -Li co Go 00 W —L m W Warren Bishop 06/30/22 O/ NM NM E X X X X X X X Minnetta 07/01/19 0/ Gardinier X X X X 0/E X X E X X Robert Libby 07/01120 O/ 01 X O/E E X X X X E X X Christopher 07/01/21 Lawrence X X X X X X X X X X Derek LaBrie 07/01/22 O/ X X X X O/E X X X X E Key: X = Present X/E = Present for Part of Meeting O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = Not a Member at this time lot CITY OC IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 20, 2019 Board of Adjustment: May 8 ATTACHMENTS: Description Board of /adjustment: May 8 Item Number: 6. MINUTES PRELIMINARY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MAY 8, 2019 — 5:15 PM EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ernie Cox, Connie Goeb, Ryan Hall, Zephan Hazell, Amy Pretorius MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Susan Dulek, Jessica Lile OTHERS PRESENT: Tim Waldron CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:15 PM. ROLL CALL: A brief opening statement was read by Goeb outlining the role and purpose of the Board and the procedures that would be followed the meeting. CONSIDER THE APRIL 10, 2019 MINUTES: Pretorius moved to approve the minutes of April 10, 2019. Hall seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion carried 5-0. SPECIAL EXCEPTION ITEM EXC19-04: An application submitted by Faith Baptist Church for a special exception to allow for an approximately 2,600 square -foot addition onto the existing Church located in a Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS -8) Zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD) located at 1251 Village Road. Lile began the staff report showing an aerial view of the site and a zoning map showing the church is surrounded by single family residential. Faith Baptist Church has been at this location since the early 1970's. The applicant hosted a Good Neighbor Meeting on April 30, 2019. Two neighbors attended with questions and concerns about potential stormwater management issues. Pastor Waldron was able to address the neighbors' concerns. The proposed request is to add a 2,600 square foot addition to the southeast corner of the building in order to construct two new classrooms, an elevator and additional restrooms. Lile noted that religious and private group assemblies can add additions up to 500 square feet through the minor modification process but since this is an expansion of more than 500 square feet a special exception is needed. The applicant is also proposing site improvements to the parking lot on the south side of the building including paving, landscaping and drainage improvements. Board of Adjustment May 8, 2019 Page 2 of 6 Lile stated the role of the Board is to approve, approve with conditions or deny this application based on the facts presented. In order to approve the special exception the Board must find the application meets all the approval criteria for the specific criteria pertaining to Religious/Private Group Assembly as well as the General Standards for all special exceptions. With regard to the specific standards, first the following setbacks are required in lieu of the setbacks specified in the base zone. However, the board of adjustment may reduce these setbacks, subject to the approval criteria for setback adjustments as specified in subsection 14- 2A-4135, "Adjustments To Principal Building Setback Requirements", of this title. Front must be twenty feet (20'); side must be twenty feet (20') and; rear must be fifty feet (50'). Lile stated the existing building and proposed addition will meet all required setbacks. Next, the proposed use will be designed to be compatible with adjacent uses. The board of adjustment will consider aspects of the proposed use, such as the site size, types of accessory uses, anticipated traffic, building scale, setbacks, landscaping, and location and amount of paved areas. The board of adjustment may deny the use or aspects of the use that are deemed out of scale, incompatible, or out of character with surrounding residential uses, or may require additional measures to mitigate these differences. Lile stated there is no change in use with the proposed addition and the applicant is not expecting new membership with this addition. The maximum occupancy for the main auditorium is capped at 292 people. The building scale will be larger but there will be additional screening to mitigate some of the impact with additional landscaping and site improvements. Next, given that large parking lots can seriously erode the single-family residential character of these zones, the board of adjustment will carefully review any requests for parking spaces beyond the minimum required. The board may limit the number of parking spaces and the size and location of parking lots, taking into account the availability of on street parking, the estimated parking demand, and opportunities for shared parking with other nonresidential uses in the vicinity of the use. Lile stated this proposed addition will add eight additional parking spots however the parking lot itself will not expand, the required number of parking spots is 49, and the applicant is proposing to provide 67 vehicle spots and 4 bicycle parking spots. The required parking for Religious/Private Group Assembly are 1/6th of the occupant capacity of the main auditorium, which again is 292 people. The applicant also proposes to pave part of the gravel portion of the lot and bring it up to City standards. Next criteria is that the proposed use will not have significant adverse effects on the livability of nearby residential uses due to noise, glare from lights, late night operations, odors, and litter. Faith Baptist has limited hours of operation with services throughout the day Sunday and into the early evening, as well as on Wednesday evenings. Most events take place inside and are not typically noisy or disruptive to neighbors, especially late at night and the proposed addition will not change the amount of noise, lights, hours of operation, odors and litter from the site currently. The building official may grant approval for the following modifications to a religious/private group assembly use, without approval from the board of adjustment, upon written findings that the modification will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or be injurious to the other property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the property is located if it is an accessory storage building less than five hundred (500) square feet in size or a building addition of less than five hundred (500) square feet, provided the addition does not Board of Adjustment May 8, 2019 Page 3 of 6 increase the occupancy load of the building. Lile stated since this proposed addition is more than 500 square feet and not eligible for the minor modification process; thus must go before the Board of Adjustment. Final specific standard states if the proposed use is located in a residential zone or in the central planning district, it must comply with the multi -family site development standards as set forth in section 14 2B-6 of the City Code. The church is located in a residential zone, and must conform to all multi -family site development standards, which is verified during the site plan review process. Lile next reviewed the general standards. First, the specific proposed exception will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort or general welfare. The church has operated in this location since the early 1970's without reported health, safety, or welfare issues and the proposed expansion would not change the function or status of this site. The specific proposed exception will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity and will not substantially diminish or impair property values in the neighborhood. Lile noted this expansion will not change the use or enjoyment of other property in the neighborhood, nor will it diminish property values because it is not changing the use or function of the site. The only changes visually will be to the roofline, south entrance, and part of the parking lot and the parking lot improvements will make this property more attractive and more compliant with the code. The current parking lot does not meet landscaping and screening requirements. With the proposed site changes, the applicant will be required to meet the S3 screening standards of the Code where abutting residential properties. Establishment of the specific proposed exception will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district in which such property is located. Lile stated all of the adjoining property is fully developed and any proposed improvements to adjoining properties will not be impacted by this expansion. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided. Lile stated the property is currently serviced with adequate utilities and roads, this expansion will not alter that. The proposed site improvements will address drainage issues on the south side of the property and the applicant is proposing a conveyance to run stormwater to the east and discharge it into the street rather than flow onto properties to the south. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on public streets. Lile noted currently the church operates with two driveways accessing Village Road on either side of the parking lot, and there are no proposed changes with this expansion and there is not any anticipated increase in traffic. Except for the specific regulations and standards applicable to the exception being considered, the specific proposed exception, in all other respects, conforms to the applicable regulations or standards of the zone in which it is to be located. Lile noted the proposed special exception conforms to all setbacks and there will be no changes in the maximum capacity for the main auditorium. The expansion would add new parking spaces that are paved and more compliant with the Code and the proposed site improvements must comply with parking and landscaping requirements of City Code. Finally, the proposed exception will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. Lile Board of Adjustment May 8, 2019 Page 4 of 6 stated the Comprehensive Plan calls for stability and since this church has been located in this neighborhood for so long this addition should not impede any stability of the area. Additionally religious and private institutional uses can be allowed in any zoning district through the special exception process. Staff recommends approval of EXC19-04, a special exception to allow the expansion of a Religious Assembly Use in Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS -8) zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD), to build an approximately 2,600 square foot addition on the existing building in order to add additional classrooms, restrooms, and an elevator with the following condition: 1. The applicant shall install stormwater management infrastructure as shown on the major site plan dated January 9, 2019 or equivalent infrastructure subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works or a designee. Goeb opened the public hearing. Tim Waldron (Faith Baptist Church) is the pastor and stated they consider it a great privilege to serve in the Iowa City community, they have been in the Iowa City area for about 55 years, 47 years at the current location. Through that time they have had some modest renovations and additions to the building and once again are asking permission to add to their building. Waldron stated the staff presentation summed up what the church desires, they do have a great need right now in regards to classrooms, restrooms and an elevator. They are completely out of space for classrooms on their Sunday morning and Wednesday evening ministries as well as vacation bible school. He also noted current restrooms are not sufficient for the size of the congregation right now and also for years they have used a stair lift to get people from the bottom to the top floors of the building, it works and passes inspections but really has become hard to find parts and people to repair if when needed. Waldron thanked those that have helped with this application and City staff for their assistance. Hall noted he feels the added landscaping feels minimal and will not hide the parking lot. Lile stated the requirements are being met per City Code. Cox asked which part of the parking lot would be improved, and Lile noted it is the south entrance area. Hall stated then the remainder of the parking lot would stay as gravel. Lile confirmed it would. Goeb asked about the drainage issues and said if the addition was not approved then the church would not be required to update and fix the drainage issues. Lile confirmed that was true and noted from the Good Neighbor Meeting some of the neighbors to the south were concerned about adding pavement and what that would do to stormwater onto their properties. Lile showed a diagram with a water collector area and a conveyance to the street so all the stormwater would run off into the street versus to the property to the south. Waldron added there are currently no drainage systems on the property and the water just ponds there so this will be a great improvement on their property. Goeb asked where it was ponding. Waldron said it is out near the utility easement, not near the building. He added there have never been any complaints from the neighbors regarding water issues, there were just some questions raised when the improvements were proposed. Board of Adjustment May 8, 2019 Page 5 of 6 Goeb asked if they would be able to save the two blooming trees in the front and Waldron stated they hope to. Goeb closed the public hearing. Hall asked if the Board adds the condition that staff recommends the Public Works Department will review. Lile confirmed that was the case but noted what the applicant is proposing is above what the Code requires which is why staff added the condition to make sure it happens. Pretorius stated this seems like a great project and expansion is good and especially the need for an elevator and paving part of the gravel lot will help with ADA compliances and overall better and safer for all. She understands the concern about stormwater but feels that is being handled appropriately. Pretorius moves to approve EXC19-04, a special exception to allow the expansion of a Religious Assembly Use in Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS -8) zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD), to build an approximately 2,600 square foot addition on the existing building in order to add additional classrooms, restrooms, and an elevator with the following condition: 1. The applicant shall install stormwater management infrastructure as shown on the major site plan dated January 9, 2019 or equivalent infrastructure subject to review and approval by the Director of Public Works or a designee. Hall seconded the motion. Hall stated that regarding agenda item EXC19-04 he concurs with the findings set forth in the staff report of May 8, 2019, and conclude the general and specific criteria are satisfied. So unless amended or opposed by another Board member he recommends that the Board adopt the findings in the staff report as our findings with acceptance of this proposal. Hazell seconded the findings. A vote was taken and the motion carried 5-0. Goeb stated the motion declared approved, any person who wishes to appeal this decision to a court of record may do so within 30 days after this decision is filed with the City Clerk's Office. ADJOURNMENT: Pretorius moved to adjourn this meeting. Hazell seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0 -107_1 N exel yc101411PI tl►'i 1 =1 ► I I ATTENDANCE RECORD 2018-2019 NAME TERM EXP. 2/14 5/9 6/13 8/8 12/12 2/13 3/13 4/10 5/8 COX, ERNIE 12/31/2020 -- -- -- -- -- -- O/E X X GOEB, CONNIE 12/31/2019 O/E X X X X O/E X X X HALL, RYAN 12/31/2022 X X X X X X X X X HAZELL, ZEPHAN 12/31/2021 -- -- -- -- -- X X X X PRETORIUS, AMY 12/31/2023 -- -- -- -- -- X X X X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member Item Number: 7. CITY OC IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 20, 2019 Senior Center Commission: May 16 ATTACHMENTS: Description Senior Center Commission: May 16 Preliminary Minutes May 16, 2019 MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION May 16, 2019 ROOM 205, IOWA CITY/JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR CENTER Members Present: Kenn Bowen, Lorraine Dorfman, Zach Goldsmith, Angela McConville, Hiram Webber Members Absent: Cheryll Clamon, Scott Finlayson Staff Present: LaTasha DeLoach, Kristin Kromray Others Present: None CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Bowen at 4:00 PM. RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE APRIL 18, 2019 MEETING: Motion: To accept the minutes from the April 18, 2019 meeting. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. Webber/Dorfman PUBLIC DISCUSSION: None. COMMISSION ASSIGNMENTS: Bowen and McConville are planning to go to the Board of Supervisors in July. OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW: DeLoach is drafting a memo to the City Council regarding the kitchen. A community organization reached out to City Council about potentially being able to use the kitchen. In the memo DeLoach will give the current status of the kitchen, what tentative plans and timeline there is for the future of the kitchen, and potential short and long-term solutions. The kitchen is currently utilized by the Elder Services/Horizon's for the congregate meal program. They do not prepare meals in the kitchen, but serve food and wash dishes from the space. Several items would need to be updated and repaired for the kitchen to be Preliminary Minutes May 16, 2019 functional. There is CIP money currently earmarked in FY21 for a kitchen remodel. Before this remodel can take place a comprehensive plan and design with input from staff, members, and the community will need to occur. Goldsmith asked if TIF funding is available to help renovate the space. The Commission discussed various options for utilizing the kitchen. DeLoach reported exterior building envelope repairs need to occur over the next two or three fiscal years with an estimated cost of $120,000. The Senior Center is partnering this summer with Horizon's to provide lunch three days a week to children free of charge. DeLoach reported staff is getting to the end of the policy reviews. There will be a few more for the Commission to consider in the next packet. Motion: To approve the Bed Bug Policy. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. Goldsmith/Dorfman Motion: To approve the Facility Security Policy. Motion carried on a vote of 510. Goldsmith/McConville Motion: To approve the Fees and Revenue Policy. Motion carried on a vote of 510. Dorfman/Goldsmith. Motion: To approve the Locker Rental Policy. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. McConville/Dorfman Motion: To approve the Low -Income Membership Program Policy. Motion carried on a vote of 510. Webber/Dorfman Dorfman asked if a person had a partial term if they could then be considered for two additional terms. DeLoach replied that yes, a partial term is not counted against the two -term limit policy. Motion: To approve the Senior Center Commission Policy. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. Goldsmith/McConville DeLoach reported the Senior Center currently has the highest paid membership number at 1712. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Bowen attended a City Council meeting and reported to them the success of the recent Open House at the Senior Center. The Commission will not hold a meeting in June. 2 Preliminary Minutes May 16, 2019 Motion: To Adjourn. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. Goldsmith/Dorfman Preliminary Minutes May 16, 2019 Senior Center Commission Attendance Record Name Term Expires 6/21/18 7/19/18 8/16/18 9/20/18 10/18/18 11/15/18 12/13/18 1/24/18 2/21/19 3/21/19 4/25/19 5/16/19 Kenn Bowen 12/31/20 X X X NM X X NM X X NM X X Cheryll Clamon 12/31/18 O/E X X NM X X NM O/E X NM X X Lorraine Dorfinan 12/31/19 X X O/E NM X X NM X X NM O/E X Robert (Scott) Finlayson 12/31/20 O/E X X NM X O/E NM X O/E NM X O/E Zach Goldsmith 12/31/21 -- -- -- -- X X NM X X NM X X Kathy Mitchell 12/31/19 X -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Margaret Reese 12/31/17 X X X NM X X NM -- -- -- -- -- Hiram (Rick) Webber 12/31/20 X X X NM X X NM X X NM X X Key: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = No meeting -- = Not a member 4