HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-03-24 Correspondence2 1
Marian Karr
From: Judith Pfohl [judypfohl@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 3:17 PM
To: Council
Subject: new school and Roosevelt
Dear Council,
The question of a new school does have a major impact on housing and areas of new growth for Iowa
City. I talked with some people who were involved with the last chaos at Roosevelt when 6th grade
bused to Horn for a year. Whatever is done will have an impact on the city and neighborhoods. You
and the other cities need to stay connected with the school decisions.
Here is a summary of comments I have heard
"We chuckle at one of the alternatives...combining Roosevelt and Horn...upper at Horn...lower at
Roosevelt. That was tried when Dave Cronin was still here. The Horn parents about had
apoplexy. Our best advice would be for Lane to get his resume' updated, then push to have the whole
district examined for building space, SES equity, and updating all buildings....air-conditioning, multi-
purpose/cafeteria rooms, handicap accessibility. But that won't happen. Instead, there will be a
stall...until the next board elections...we imagine there are already groups forming to elect Horn parents
as there was the last time the Pheasant Ridge Cloud loomed over Horn's halcyon campus.
We've heard about the scurrilous comment that the Horn PTO Pres. e-mailed to her constituents. The
whole thing is just upsetting and will in the end bring out the very worst in many, with hurt feelings and
more irrepairable damage to community relations. In the Lincoln neighborhood, there hasn't been a
peep from these people...nor Shimek. They'll stay out of it unless their pristine environments/clientele
are threatened...
A real concern is busing Roosevelt children clear out to the Crossings...particularly those families
east/south of the Roosevelt campus. People who can least afford to be driving distances, will have to
travel the fartherest if they want to have any connection/relationship with the school. It just won't
happen.
The best hope is that they will tear down the old section of Roosevelt and build a wonderful new
addition...then tear down the back half and rebuild that as time and money permits. "
Judy Pfohl
Ty'n Cae Neighborhood President
3/16/2009
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr
From: Mary Yagla [yags12@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:27 PM
To: Council
Subject: Iowa City School District Infastructure Proposal
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to express my disapproval of the Iowa City School Board's recent proposal to close
Roosevelt and relocate a school to the fringes of Iowa City. I understand that as council members,
you are trying to decide on whether or not to write a letter to the school board concerning this very
issue. I believe that the relocation of a school greatly impacts, not only the school, it's students
and families, but the surrounding neighborhood and the greater community as well. Usually, I
would not advocate for the City Council to interact with the local school board, but this is a special
case because the decisions the school board is making will effect the entire community, not just
Roosevelt students and families. I encourage you, as our City Council, to contact the school board,
because I do not want to see my neighborhoods slip away to the outskirts of town.
Respectfu I ly,
Mary Peterson
1417 Pine Street
Windows Liver'": Keep your life in sync. Che_c_k__t_o_ut._
3/9/2009
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr
From: Steve Yagla [steve.yagla@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 7:30 PM
To: Council
Subject: School Infrastructure proposal
I am opposed to the IC School Board proposal to rebuild Roosevelt Elementary at a different location.
Since this action will have a significant affect on neighborhoods in our community I believe it is
appropriate and prudent to have the city council send a letter of opposition and engage in dialog with the
the school board.
Respectfully,
Steve Yagla
3/9/2009
~~~` ~
.-~..~ ~/ ~~~'y~ JIB --cy/~ ~ ~ ~/1/~/ y~j//~ _ 1-~._- J/,- fry
/~~ 7 lJ~-~ ~ . vV~ 4~ ~ V/ l/'_.'` ~(/ Vl_.~Z//C.-~~~'~ j `.-'' ~rifi~N K~"'"~~~
f ` {~ n ` Jj~1 ~j f ~ V~ J ~C.s. 1~~`'~- ~-~'~r'~~o ""'~ /~~~ ~a~/c.1//~-- ,~~
L ~- L /
~..= ~-~-e~'
1
/ / r -'~/
// /`i
/ f' r-. f ~~ ~t~~~ 6' Lam' ~
°~~ ` ~ '~ i
C C~" v`
~iL~-' ,n
~.. ~ ~
~~
~~
_.1 G` G~ ,.~~,.
~'~'~ _ .
~. -
_. _ , .
~.
~~ ~ .`.-i
...~f.-~ ~ _ _
/~ ~
CfJ`~~
Anti Kohl
709 61611n Dr.
Iowa Cky, lA 52246-5510
~f~
~ ~ ~
r~^
'vi`" ~
--t i"'"1
:Cr-
" .q ~
f
~ xm.
~~
b ._,.
Q.
~A Tragedy of Two '~'- ,~`>
Decisions Avoided
BY BRYCE BAUER
A flower, petals numbered by nature
He loves me, he loves me not; One for do, one for do not
A man sits at a pub alone, love spurned by the whims of natural selection
- a decision feeble made -
One for mc, One for you, He tells the bartender
~1 consolation as old as what is being consoled.
/ U~ /~ T
But no more! P~aR - ~ ?QQ~
As other revelers indulge one
t~vo
ten
slurred conversation crescendos
images, across the smoke-cleared room, blur
out to the world they stumble, destiny unknown
to a warm bed
OR blows between brawlers
OR a child-car collision
The bartender knows not,
But tells our lovelorn, No drink for me.
- it's forbade, in effort to temper indulgence an ordinance was made
above .02, no more can I pour
there's a cop over there.
you take both
go and pass .08 on your path to blackness.
That act of over-service, the law says is illegal too.
But in this city
Anointed a Top Party Place
To where, from regions far around students come to swill
Leaders speak of promoting sobriety
making drinks smaller, more expensive,
harder to obtain underage
Shops close and bars open
- an incursion legitimized through liquor licenses - ;~.
The Cutoff's missed ~V
Such an edict -too toilsome to enforce, Enforcers say.
So to where will our unloved inebriate flit with One Drink Too Many? -
Harmlessly down the street?
OR face-forward onto the pavement?
~i
OR afreezing-night's rest in the alley?
Don't ask our officer or our server, one's making sure the other is safe and sob
AUTHOR'S NOTE
1 tlrst became interested in the Icgal i5pcctti of
alcuhol o~ e r ,crv!c~ a little more than t ~ car as*o,
~~ ~nc~n TJarl, Iraz~z.n re~i~rrer IicLc~ Be;lcramca and I
started u~url:ui~~ on a seoe~° about the subject.
llurin~ uur research, mxn} sources ~~ ° talked to
said the tell ~ n~blen with alcohol comes ~chen ~ co
~~, h1e drink nx, t~luch injurin;~ thcrosch~cs and oihcrs.
~ Those s unecs readily adniirted that hr t a. on
~ other as(~e<t. of alee>hul a~nsumprion, Such as
.~ndcta~>c drdnl.ir~ct,~«re just dt~tracti<~iu i'roni this
~ lulu nlorc serious i5we_ Bars that zervc tnrottCar-
~ ed patrr?ns tick tines, loss of liquor licenses, and
~ larvc lati~suits.
But as -an}°one whu has spent rime dF,ivnrown
hnu~crs, many, manq drunk peuptE are sell being
set~<d at b u~s throw *houe7ou~ C~ir~-~ho~~gh Tom-a
~~ lax saS~s tt is iller~l to serge a p uron who ~s; or
~ appears tip be mioucued. Yuba rccards dating
~ back to 211(10 shops that no Jowa Cite bar has ever
c
- been cited for over-serciee.
1 ., ~. - :~i~:~l, ~z~aspublishcd, nn Peb. 28,
.:; ...~ ~ ~ ~h '~ e these di~~ r~~ ~ ~~,
~~~ ~ «~~ i ~ l ~ „ I u~ ~ at people ~ ~ui i ~ ui ro
- th II II ,~ f ~ i1~J~~ ^C',1~ I`Oil allel
~x ~ ~,
et?i ~ iua rh ~ ~~Ir i~ . .o, ~ ~ l at~~~ 1~., u
~cc i i d.~i' 'n hal 1•~ n_
~~ ~ In t ail, Elie t u •;rlc a,rainsi ~ ~~i~~,l', ill-cHrer~
-~~ [~_nti[:mies thi u h she 1 t icuni,i! Zl ur,lia.~ti~~c ddzu~~
-J V -~r: 1 ~r!i~r m ie i ~:,,i ~ ~ iop,~ e~, he the S u~~ Cin
V ~~ l a~ C ~urxil ~ ~ h a~ } m ti^<~ Ii epl;c hnurti 1 h~~;~
~ ~ ~ (gin us s:~ a~iiat ;o I>>a~' tnc tc, ~c~ir~~ this 1~~wn,
ecn ~ nr.:~ ,r ~n ~l~c lwrcnuil ln- ~~t, .m ai tss~.~e- at rlmi
,~ J tirua: m;ikinu it ill~~~a t~~r rc~taur.inl wnd brit st,t~~! i~,
drank on nc~ j~,h. 1'htr iilc;~, Lkc nuns hcl~~rc nr~u:
`-~+~~ ~ ap] cats tai be<h {d. ~1 File nc~s~ ~de:u ee~teinl~, l;ceh
~I~_I> itc ~;i~l c~i~c i~tii~~n Ali [_, t~i<< ill shirt t} c key
~ 'r ~ i ~ ~~c c ~n~uinh n.
~~ I u~ ~ I. ~ c r . hrt t u ~ ~ ,n c :{ te« F-its _inr
`~ \
~~ ti:~~e I r I ~ c the it Gcrn ~ 1 Ice,w e ~Iie~; t~n~~,l s
~~~ K ~r~~ri it or t ~1~~iirrihc Iar~~~ii i ~.~lun i,nca<,
~rj er,i, n ~, -k> licinur~iflilor.m~lt~~v:~r
_ i~~~~t i ~ elfc~ _- atli k~ l~~a.:
,i .i.t~ni~n; ~n~r- crsirc I i>, Iv~'t n h.inace~.
arn:1, I Ln_': n~~~~n t~> [~I~rc L~Lrn.~ ,„I,~c u:~ tL~ l,~~i~~e.
ur-' , i ~~ __ I'i .arc r~~, 1~..,u< air it ~i fr~quen~
F~~,i~ t,~ I~iin~ J;~nl<!c~ I h~ i>r~~l~l,~n !~,r ~r~nr_r~~~r,
~.i ~i ,,n ~ nri.~J ~ Ali ~ o. i {n a,,~. i~ i n~l.~
ii,~n iu~ i,,,,:.u l e~ ,~iu I l <<,~ Ic eri ~ i,~ I _.,
<<,u il., _-,ii!! iud u.rt, i., iinl,it~~ i„., nuir!;;nnl
eY. r.r~:~_ irci:;"Ir 1 r~;~r~~:~.~~ n ~.u-ril .~-. d:~ Li~,~ i,
~~ru r , ~~ .~_mr,l ~In.~~~tl~; a i~~o.i~~i i r! c t ~J<< rr n
~, nl,~r~n a;iJ .ic ;.~:c ~4~1 L~ u;,_,i
}vherc the,pc(. ~~:,, i-, il, ~~;u<~
t'.~,~~~~ rce-
,mcnr can Bract tonight;cnuLi I~.~ ~ iur~l yesterda~'>
;and doesn't require len>;tlrv t ~, ~~~. Council di,cnssion.
Bryce Baez u ~ fo~rr,;, I) L ^' . ~.. ~ r>Iar astd rzLoiY.r u~rd ~r
se~nir»'.r?rim; lonrn.r4, _._, _...: ~::v?Stirrli~:r.
2 3
Marian Karr
From: Dale Helling
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:50 PM
To: 'Kimberly Streeby'
Cc: Council; Mike Moran
Subject: RE: IOWA CITY SKATEPARK
Dear Evan,
Thank you for your email to the City Council regarding a skatepark on the East side of town. Council members do
not receive their emails directly but your message, along with this response, will be forwarded to them.
Presently there are no plans to construct another skatepark in Iowa City. Thus far Council has not talked about
building another one. And to be quite honest, it is unlikely that one would be proposed in the next few years due
to a lack of available funding. However, that is not to say that sometime in the future such a facility wouldn't be
given consideration.
Normally, recreational facilities are first discussed and prioritized by the Iowa City Parks & Recreation
Commission. They are then given closer consideration by Council based, in large part, on how high a priority the
Commission places on them. I would suggest you contact the Parks & Recreation Commission and make your
request known to them. You can email them via the Parks and Recreation Department at icrec iowa-city.org
Thanks for your interest and for communicating your idea to the City Council.
Sincerely,
Dale Helling
Assistant City Manager
cc. Mike Moran, Acting Parks and Recreation Director
From: Kimberly Streeby [mailto:pkstreeby22@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 5:31 PM
To: Council
Subject: IOWA CITY SKATEPARK
Dear City Council:
I would like to request the building of a new skatepark on the east side of Iowa
City. It would be a fun place for kids and teen to go after school or during breaks. It is to
hard to get all the way over to the river when they don't have a ride. It would possibly
attract people from towns where they don't have skateparks or can't get to one. Please take
this into consideration.
sincerely,
Evan Streeby
Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail~. See_._h_ow.
3/13/2009
tME~Tq~
y `* ~Ilill~ * sc
~~ II~II~II Q~~ ~`
9g,H DEVE~o
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
THE SECRETARY
WASHINGTON, DC 20410-0001
March 6, 2009
The Honorable Regenia Bailey
Mayor of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mayor Bailey:
2 4
Q
'~C)
~~
CZ -~
--1 C7
-< f--
t~
o ~'
~~
N
;T,
::'L'1
W
w
r.~
cr
.~..
t
~~
I am pleased to inform you that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
has allocated $10.1 billion, made available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) (Public Law 111-5) signed into law by President Obama on
February 17, 2009.
This letter provides the allocations from the Recovery Act for the following programs
administered by the Department: Community Development Block Grants; Public Housing
Capital Fund; Lead Hazard Reduction; Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance; Homelessness
Prevention Fund; and Tax Credit Assistance. These programs provide funding for housing,
community and economic development, and assistance for low- and moderate-income persons
and special populations across the country.
Table 1 reflects the level of funding directly available for those programs in your
community. Table 2 identifies funding available through other partners in your community, and
finally, Table 3 identifies the allocation provided to your state for which you may apply:
Table 1-Grants awarded directly to your community
Recove Act o 2009 Pro ram Grant Amount
Community Development Block Grant $176,785
Homelessness Prevention Fund $0
Lead Hazard Reduction $0
www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov
Table 2 -Grants awarded to partners in your community
Recovery Act of 2009 Program Grant Amount Percent of Units in
Your Communi
Public Housing Capital Fund* $191,853 99%
Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance** $943,831
Lead Hazard Reduction Grant $0
*Some housing authorities serve areas larger than the city or county. The Grant Amount reflects the total grant to
the housing authority(ies), and Percent of Units in Your Community reflects the percent of its (their) public housing
units that are in your community.
**The Project-Based Rental Assistance reflects the funding needed to meet the Federal Government's contractual
obligation with project-based owner(s).
Table 3 -Grants awarded to the state. Partners in your community might be able to apply
for these funds. ~j
~_
Recove Act o 2009 Pro ram Grant Amount ~ `'
Tax Credit Assistance $18,978,542 ~ ~ w
~~
~~
Additional competitive funding will become available in the near future for EA
Neighborhood Stabilization Program, the Public Housing Capital Fund Program (reovatioWi~' nd
energy conservation), and the Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance Program (energy
conservation).
Investments made with Recovery Act funds must be efficient, effective, and without
waste, fraud, or abuse. To this end, the Recovery Act requires unprecedented levels of
transparency, oversight, and accountability -measures that HUD rigorously will enforce.
Effective performance measurement and accountability are crucially important in all formula
grant programs, and it is essential that HUD have complete performance data to report to
President Obama, the Congress, and the American people. Your dedication to complete accurate
reporting of performance measurement data will be necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of
your investments specifically, and of HUD formula grant programs and the Recovery Act at
large. To ensure transparency and accountability for Recovery Act investments, public reports
will be disclosed through a central website, www.RecoverS!.gov, and through HUD's Recovery
website, www.hud.gov/recovery.
Local governments nationwide are grappling with effects of the current economic
challenge. The timely expenditure of Recovery Act funds being announced in this allocation, in
addition to the competitive funds that will be made available in the near future, are targeted to
help communities and families recover from the economic situation. Furthermore, many of these
Recovery Act funds make it possible for communities to reap the three benefits of energy
retrofitting: the creation of local green jobs, utility cost savings, and a reduction in carbon
emissions. HUD strongly encourages its grantees to focus on this opportunity.
2
As with all HUD Recovery Act programs, your community has HUD's commitment to be
as flexible as possible to help communities such as yours address local needs in the most
effective manner.
I look forward to establishing a partnership to help strengthen your community for years
to come. HUD is always available to ontact uourlocal HUD Field Office ffectively. If you or
your staff have any questions, please c y
Sincerely,
~ ~. -~cP
ca
~"
~, .~ _ ~°
~; ~~
~,
3
Shaun Donovan
d3-24-09
2 5
Marian Karr
From: John Yapp
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:45 AM
To: 'cdenburg@mchsi.com'
Cc: "City Council; Kathryn Johansen; Michael Lombardo; Ron Knoche; Crystal Smith
Subject: FW: Sidewalk needed by Taft Alternative High School
Hello Ms. Denburg -your email has been forwarded to me for a response.
The property owner is correct -the City has no authority to require the property owner to construct the sidewalk
until they develop their lot. The requirement for sidewalk construction can be applied when the property owner
seeks approval for site development and/or building permit, but otherwise the City has no 'stick' to require the
sidewalk. Typically sidewalks are the last piece of infrastructure to be installed, as they are easily damaged
during the development process.
If the City wished to install the sidewalk in advance of development, it could be done as a City Council-directed
assessment project, or at City/Public expense. Starting in fiscal year 2009, Iowa City has budgeted some funds
for 'sidewalk infill' projects. We will add this sidewalk segment to the list of potential sidewalk infill projects. We
will be presenting the list of potential sidewalk infill projects to the City Council later this spring.
Thank you for your note,
John Yapp, Transportation Planner
From: Christine Denburg [mailto:cdenburg@mchsi.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:57 AM
To: Council
Subject: Sidewalk needed by Taft Alternative High School
Dear Council,
Four years ago during a snow storm I encountered students from Taft walking in the street. If my car would have
hit a patch of ice the children would have been seriously injured. The street is very narrow and it is very difficult
for cars during snow storms to move far enough into the other lane to stay a safe distance from the children. All
the businesses on the street provide sidewalks except for one lot that is undeveloped that is just 200 feet from the
Alternative High School.
The narrow road doesn't give drivers much room to keep a safe distance from the pedestrians in slippery
conditions.
Since all the other businesses provide sidewalks I have also seen pedestrians, once they discovered there is no
sidewalk, crossing at the Ace Hardware driveway to get to the sidewalk on the other side of Mall Avenue. Once
they get to the other side they realize the sidewalk is 12 feet from the street - so sometimes they walk along that
side of the street.
I have stopped into Dr. Mergen's office several times over the years to ask if he can provide sidewalks. His staff
has told me repeatedly he has contacted his lawyer and he is not legally obligated to provide a sidewalk until he
chooses to develop the lot.
Can the city do something to provide 100 feet of sidewalk on this undeveloped lot so pedestrians won't walk out in
the street on snowy (and muddy) days.
3/10/2009
Page 2 of 2
Thank you,
Christine Denburg
3/10/2009
2 6
Marian Karr
From: Regenia Bailey [bailey@avalon.net]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 10:14 PM
To: Marian Karr
Subject: FW: Shelter Overflow Interim Project
Attachments: CRC Overflow Mar09.docx
From: Dorothy Whiston [mailto:dwhiston@mchsi.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 9:26 PM
To: Regenia-Bailey@iowa-city.org
Cc: amy-Correia@iowa-city.org; Connie-champion@iowa-city.org; mike-odonnell@iowa-city.org; matt-
hayek@iowa-city.org; mike-Wright@iowa-city.org; ross-Wilburn@iowa-city.org
Subject: Shelter Overflow Interim Project
Dear Mayor Bailey,
Please find attached a letter from the Consultation of Religious Communities (CRC) of Johnson County regarding
the needs for overflow housing for the homeless in our area next winter, when the Shelter House will again be
unable to provide accommodations for everyone in need. In recent years, the CRC has provided this assistance
under the direction of the Shelter house, but additional resources are required for next year. I look forward to
working with the City Council and other governmental and private non-profit entities in Johnson County to come
to a workable solution for meeting these basic services in our community until the Shelter House is able to do
so. Thank you.
Dorothy Whiston, President
Consultation of Religious Communities
Dorothy W. Whiston, D.Min.
Soul Friends (at Old Brick)
26 E. Market St., Iowa City IA 52245
319.321.7920 dwhiston@mchsi.com
Ultimately we have just one moral duty: to reclaim large areas of peace in ourselves, more and more peace and
to reflect it towards others. The more peace there is in us, the more peace there will be in our troubled world.
--Etty Hillesum, An Interrupted Life
3/17/2009
Consultation of Religious Communities
PO Box 2025, Iowa City, IA 52244
Dorothy Whiston, D.Min., President
319-321-7920 dwhistonia?mchsi.com
March 16, 2009
Ms. Regenia Bailey, Mayor
City of Iowa City
410 E. Washington
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mayor Bailey;
As you know, the member faith communities of the Consultation of Religious Communities
(CRC) of Johnson County have worked together to provide overflow housing for people turned
away from a filled Shelter House from November through March for the last five years.
Through the Interim Overflow Project, CRC communities have provided an average of 1200 to
1600 person/nights of housing each year with nightly averages growing from 6 per night in
2005 to the current 12 guests per night. Well over 500 volunteers have put in more than
30,000 hours in this effort over the years. The monetary cost has been limited to under $7000
annually, with most expenses covered by individual donations of time, food and materials, as
well as church building utilities and overhead.
For many reasons, this arrangement is no longer feasible. The CRC's original commitment was
to provide overflow accommodations and volunteers for 2-3 years while the Shelter House built
a new facility. This was extended when that building effort got tied up in court. This winter it
became clear that another arrangement would be needed for next year. The equipment we've
been transporting from church to church is worn out and our volunteer pool is exhausted. In
fact, we had to rely heavily on UI students to staff the program this year.
Until recently Shelter House expected to break ground this spring and to have made enough
building progress to host its own overflow in the partially completed facility next winter. Due
to the economic downturn, construction will almost definitely be delayed so that this will not
be an option after all. For a variety of reasons Shelter House will also be unable to provide staff
to coordinate an overflow project that relies on others for space and volunteers, as they have
done the past five years.
The CRC cannot take on this project alone. We ask that Johnson County municipal and county
governments and non-profit agencies work together to provide staff assistance to coordinate
the overflow housing project and recruit and oversee volunteers. It would also be ideal if a
single site could be found - perhaps a community center, government building orschool -to
house the people in our communities who will otherwise endanger their health by sleeping out
of doors next winter. While religious communities will still gladly contribute to a volunteer pool
and provide breakfast supplies as we have in the past, it is imperative that the wider
community be involved and that paid staff be found to coordinate this project (the CRC has no
staff).
The CRC is dedicated to working with our communities to meet the needs of those among us
who are most disadvantaged and know you share this goal. It would be unacceptable for us to
fail to protect our fellow citizens from the cold of Iowa winter nights. The CRC has worked
alone with Shelter House to ensure this has been done for some time and we ask that
government and other civic bodies now support this effort. We look forward to working on this
with you in any way we can.
Sincerely,
Dorothy Whiston, President
Consultation of Religious Communities
cc: Iowa City Council
Coralville City Council and Mayor
North Liberty City Council and Mayor
Johnson County Board of Supervisors
United Way of Johnson County
~~ ~
March 17, 2009
Mayor Regenia Bailey
430 Church Street
Iowa City, IA 52245
Michael Lombardo
City Manager
410 E. Washington St.
Iowa City, IA 52240
Rick Fosse
Public Works Director
410 E. Washington St.
Iowa City, IA 52240
Mary M. Murphy & Gregg Geerdes
890 Park Place
Iowa City, Iowa 52246
319/354-2375
Mc~9425@mchsi. com
geerdeslaw@peo~eAC com
Council Members
Connie Champion
Matt Hayek
Mike Wright
Mike O'Donnell
Amy Correia
Rass Wilburn
Dear Mayor Bailey, Mr. Lombardo, Council Members, and Mr. Fosse:
C)
~~
t? "< N ~,
:G €"
~~ ~
+
D O
N
Because the city is now discussing flood mitigation strategies, it is vitally important that it recognizes
our situation and other similarly situated homeowners.
We reside in the Parkview Terrace neighborhood and were mandatorily evacuated on June 12, 2008,
along with our five children. Our power and sewage services were turned off by the city around the
same time. Flood waters did not reach our home. Instead, our basement was inundated with backup
water resulting in the destruction of its contents and substantial costs. We did not receive legal access
to begin working on our property until June 21 and were able to legally reside in our home on July 3.
However, we, and everyone similarly situated in our neighborhood who had a basement, suffered
extensive water backup from our basement drains and other basement plumbing.
Several things should be done to correct this situation.
First, action must be taken to ensure that your lift station continues to operate during periods of
flooding for homes that flood waters did not reach.
Second, the city should not unilaterally order the shutting off of electricity to the entire neighborhood.
Third, the city's mandatory evacuation of the entire Park View Terrace needs to be reconsidered. Those
of us who did not suffer surface water flooding of our homes live on the south part of Park View Terrace,
are contiguous to non-flooded property, and are able to access our property from Park Road and/or
Oakridge. Our neighbors on these streets kindly consented to crossing their properties to access our
homes.
Letter to Iowa City Officials
March 17, 2009
If we had been able to do so, we could have operated generators and greatly reduced or perhaps even
eliminated our damages. Indeed, we had a generator sitting outside our basement windows ready to
operate.
When we inquired about the reason we were ordered from our home, we were told it was because
emergency vehicles could not access our property. That is absurd. Access for emergency services was
at all time was available from Park, Oak Park, Willis and other streets. Also, the flooding was itself an
emergency, and it is ridiculous to deny homeowners access to an emergency because of a claimed lack
of access.
During the time that we were evacuated, we personally asked Mayor Bailey and Council Member
Wilburn to visit our end of the neighborhood to view why it should be treated differently during a
disaster than those areas of the neighborhood that were directly impacted by the Iowa River. Despite
entering the Normandy end of the neighborhood with President Bush for a photo opportunity, both
Mayor Bailey and Council Member Wilburn declined our invitation citing the evacuation order (although
either could have stood on non-evacuated property contiguous to ours and easily viewed our property).
Further, the City did not uniformly enforce its mandatory evacuation order this past summer as
neighbors and contractors worked on their properties, and FEMA, insurance, and media personnel were
present. Mayor Bailey did inform me that the evacuation order was lifted for President Bush.
To summarize, the best mitigation you can provide us with is to fix the city's sewage problems and to
allow us to promptly fix things ourselves if you are unable or unwilling to do so.
We would appreciate a response as to what alternatives are available for providing us with sewage
services in the event of a future flood and what alternative you intend to pursue as well as any
estimated completion dates by April 5, 2009. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
~~~ ~~
Mar M. Mur by and Gregg eerdes
Y p
~~
Ca
--6 t"3
O
Cr-
C'7 ~
~ ca
tv
11
TENTATIVE AGREEMENT
City of Iowa City, Iowa
and
Police Labor Relations Organization of Iowa City
March 16, 2009
The parties hereby agree to the following:
1. A one year contract for Fiscal Year 2010 (July 1, 2009 through June
30, 2010.
2. The recommendations of Factfinder Anna Duval Smith as
outlined in the attached "Summary of Recommendations" are agreed
to with the exception regarding Health Insurance indicated in #3
below.
3 The portion of the monthly premium paid by each officer for family
health insurance will increase to $60.00 per month in FY 2010.
All other terms and conditions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement
remain unchanged.
For the City:
Dale Hellin As .City nager
Date: ~ ~~ ~ Q
For the PLRO-IC:
David Schwindt, President
Date: d3 ~~(p~~Q'
of the existing performance appraisal system to sustain acceptable oflicer performance.
Moreover, only three of the eight comparison cities have such systems.
Wages
health Insurance
V. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Item
Recommendation
3.1%
Clothing and Equipment Allowance (Plain
Clothes Officers)
Court Pay
Special Duty Pay (FTO)
Personnel Transactions
Step Increases
Grievance Procedure -Step Two
Grievance Procedure -Arbitration
March 2, 2009
Cuyahoga County, Ohio
ADS:sss
iperbl314
Current provision
$700 clothing/$175 cleaning & boots; cash
payment
Current provision
10% of hourly pay for each hour of FTO dilty
Current provision
Current provision
As agreed by the parties
As agreed by the parties
Respectfully submitted,
Anna Duval Stnith, Ph.D.
Fact Finder
10