The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-02-04 ResolutionItem Number: 7.a. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution Approving a Purchase Agreement by and between the City of Iowa City and Iowa City Elks Lodge #590 for auditor's parcel 2019-136 at the corner of Foster Road and No Name Street. Prepared By: Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Jason Havel, City Engineer Fiscal Impact: Payment of Purchase Price in amount of $329,251. Funds are available in the City's Emergency Fund . Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: NA Attachments: Resolution Purchase Agreement Executive Summary: City purchase of auditor's parcel 2019-136, an 8.06 -acre parcel of real estate at the corner of Foster Road and No Name Street both satisfies the needs of the Idlyllwild Stormwater Diversion Project and furthers the City's policy, since the flood of 2008, to pursue the acquisition of property in the floodplain when funding becomes available or properties become available for sale at a reasonable price in order to prevent development in the floodplain. The purchase price of $329,251.00 ($40,850.00 per acre) is reasonable in light of the appraisal obtained by the City for the Idyllwild Stormwater Diversion Project. Background /Analysis: It is necessary for the City to acquire a .71 acre permanent storm sewer easement and a temporary construction easement along the eastern portion of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136 in order to construct the Idyllwild Stormwater Diversion Project. Following the City's offer for the permanent and temporary construction easement the Elks and the City negotiated the attached Purchase Agreement that provides for the City's acquisition of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136. 80% of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136 is in a flood zone, with most being in the 100 -year floodplain and a smaller portion being in the 500 -year flood plain. The acquisition of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136 both satisfies the needs of the Idlyllwild Stormwater Diversion Project and furthers the City's policy, since the flood of 2008, to pursue the acquisition of property in the floodplain when funding becomes available or properties become available for sale at a reasonable price in order to prevent development in the floodplain. The purchase price of $329,251.00 ($40,850.00 per acre) is reasonable in light of the appraisal obtained by the City for the Idyllwild Stormwater Diversion Project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Purchase Agreement 1,0- Prepared by: Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 319/356-5030 Resolution No. 20-21 Resolution approving a purchase agreement by and between the City of Iowa City and Iowa City Elks Lodge #590 for auditor's parcel 2019-136 at the corner of Foster Road and No Name Street. Whereas, Auditor's Parcel 2019-136, an 8.06 -acre parcel of real estate at the corner of Foster Road and No Name Street is currently owned by Iowa City Elks Lodge #590 ("Elks"); and Whereas, it is necessary for the City to acquire a permanent storm sewer easement and temporary construction easement along the eastern portion of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136 in order to construct the Idyllwild Stormwater Diversion Project; and Whereas, following the City's offer for the permanent and temporary construction easement the Elks and the City negotiated the attached Purchase Agreement that provides for the City's acquisition of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136; and Whereas, 80% of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136 is in a flood zone, with most being in the 100 -year floodplain and a smaller portion being in the 500 -year flood plain; and, Whereas, the acquisition of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136 both satisfies the needs of the Idlyllwild Stormwater Diversion Project and furthers the City's policy, since the flood of 2008, to pursue the acquisition of property in the floodplain when funding becomes available or properties become available for sale at a reasonable price, in order to prevent development in the floodplain; and, Whereas, the purchase price of $329,251.00 ($40,850.00 per acre) is reasonable in light of the appraisal obtained by the City for the Idyllwild stormwater diversion project; and Whereas, the Purchase Agreement is contingent upon City Council Approval; and Whereas, it is in the best interests of the residents of Iowa City for the City to acquire said property. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The attached Purchase Agreement is approved by the City Council. 2. Upon direction of the City Attorney, the Mayor is authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest any and all documentation necessary to effectuate the purchase of the property pursuant to the purchase agreement approved herein. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020 ATTEST: City Attorney's /-90-7-0 Resolution No. 20-21 Page 2 It was moved by Salih and seconded by Thomas the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO: Iowa City Elks Lodge #590, 637 Foster Road, Iowa City, Iowa 52245 (Seller) The City of Iowa City, a municipal corporation of the State of Iowa (herein "City") hereby offers to buy, and the undersigned Seller, by its acceptance of this Agreement, agrees to sell the real property situated in Johnson County, Iowa, legally described as follows: Auditor's Parce12019-136, Johnson County, Iowa (plat attached hereto as Exhibit "A") together with all the Seller's right, title and interest in all buildings and improvements, if any, located on the above-described real estate, and subject to any easements and appurtenant servitudes for the benefit of the Seller, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, reservations, exceptions and modifications, except for the Permitted Exceptions, as defined below. The entirety of the above-described interests being conveyed shall hereinafter be referred to as the "PmpW,. The Property shall be conveyed with good, clear and marketable title, subject to the following Permitted Exceptions: 1. Zoning and building laws and ordinances; 2. covenants, restrictions, reservations and easements ofrecord approved by City. In consideration of the covenants and obligations contained herein, the Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1. PURCHASE PRICE. The Purchase Price for the Property shall be $329,251.00, to be paid in full at the time of closing, all title objections being corrected to show marketable title. 2. REAL ESTATE TAXES. Seller pays its prorated share, based upon the date of closing, of the real estate taxes for the fiscal year in which closing occurs, due and payable in the subsequent fiscal year, and all unpaid taxes for prior years. The amount shall be calculated based upon the assessed valuation, legislative tax rollback and real estate tax exemptions that may be applicable to and used for the calculation of taxes payable in the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2020. If, at the time of closing, the tax rate has not been certified, then the most current certified tax rate shall be used. Buyer shall be given a credit for such proration at closing. 3. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Seller shall pay all installments of special assessments which have been certified to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection before the Closing date. All charges for solid waste removal, sewage and maintenance that are attributable to Seller's possession, inbluding those for which assessments arise atter closing, shall be paid by Sellers. Any preliminary or deficiency assessment which cannot be discharged by payment shall he paid by Seller through an escrow account with sufficient funds to pay such liens when payable, with any unused funds returned to Seller. 4. RISK OF LOSS AND INSURANCE. Seller shall bear the risk of loss or damage to the Property prior to closing or possession, whichever first occurs. Seller agrees to maintain existing insurance until closing or possession, whichever first occurs. City may also insure the Property prior to closing or possession. The Property shall be preserved in its present condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and Seller shall deliver it intact at the time the City takes possession. Prior to the City taking possession, Seller shall promptly give written notice to the City of any loss or damage to the Property. In the event of loss, damage or destruction of all or part of the Property, the City shall have the option to terminate this Agreement effective immediately. However, in the case of loss, damage or destruction of all or part of the Property from causes covered by insurance, the City shall have the option to either 1) take possession of the Property and accept an assignment of all Seller's right, title and interest in and to any claims Seller has under the insurance policies covering the Property; or 2) terminate this Agreement effective immediately. 5. POSSESSION AND CLOSING. If Seller timely performs all obligations, possession of the Property shall be delivered to City on or before March 15, 2020. Any adjustments of rent, insurance, taxes, interest and all charges attributable to the Seller's possession shall be made as of the date of closing. Closing shall occur after approval of title by Buyer's attorney and vacation of the Property by Seller. Seller agrees to permit City to inspect the Property within 48 hours prior to closing to assure that the premises are in the condition required by this Agreement. If possession is given on a day other than closing, the parties shall make a separate agreement with adjustments as of the date of possession. . 6. FIXTURES. Included with the Property shall be all fixtures that integrally belong to, are specifically adapted to or are a part of the real estate, whether attached or detached, such as: fencing, gates, bushes, trees, shrubs and plants. 7. ABSTRACT AND TITLE. Seller, at its expense, shall promptly obtain an abstract of title to the Property continued through a date agreed upon between Seller and City, the same to be no sooner than the date of approval from the Elks National Board, and deliver it to City s attorney for examination. It shall show merchantable title in Seller in conformity with this Agreement, Iowa law, and Title Standards of the Iowa State Bar Association. The Seller shall make every reasonable effort to promptly perfect title. If closing is delayed due to Seller's inability to provide marketable title, this Agreement shall continue in force and effect until either party rescinds the Agreement after giving ten days written notice to the other party. The abstract shall become the property of City when the purchase price is paid in full. Seller shall pay the costs of any additional abstracting and title work due to any act or omission of Seller, including transfers by or the death of Seller or their assignees. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. (a) Seller warrants to the best of its knowledge and belief that there are no abandoned wells, solid waste disposal sites, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks located on the Property, the Property does not contain levels of radon gas, asbestos or urea-formaldehyde foam insulation which require remediation under current governmental standards, and Seller has done nothing to contaminate the Property with hazardous wastes or substances. Seller warrants that the Property is not subject to any local, state, or federal judicial or administrative action, investigation or order, as the case may be, regarding wells, solid waste disposal sites, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks. Seller shall also provide City with a properly executed GROUNDWATER HAZARD STATEMENT showing no wells, private burial sites, solid waste disposal sites, hazardous waste and underground storage tanks on the Property unless disclosed here: (b) City may, at its expense, within 10 days after the date of acceptance, obtain a report from a qualified engineer or other person qualified to analyze the existence or nature of any hazardous materials, substances, conditions or wastes located on the Property. In the event any hazardous materials, substances, conditions or wastes are discovered on the Property, City's obligation hereunder shall be contingent upon the removal of such materials, substances, conditions or wastes or other resolution of the matter reasonably satisfactory to City. However, in the event Seller is required to expend any sum in excess of $5,000 to remove any hazardous materials, substances, conditions or wastes, Seller shall have the option to cancel this transaction and refund to City all Earnest Money paid and declare this Agreement null and void. The expense of any inspection shall be paid by City. The expense of any action necessary to remove or otherwise make safe any hazardous material, substance, conditions or waste shall be paid by Seller, subject to Seller's right to cancel this transaction as provided above. 9. DEED. Upon payment of the purchase price, Seller shall convey the Property to City by Warranty Deed, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, and encumbrances except as provided in this Agreement. General warranties of title shall extend to the time of delivery of the deed excepting liens or encumbrances suffered or permitted by City. 10. STATEMENT AS TO LIENS. If City intends to assume or take subject to alien on the Property, Seller shall firnish City with a written statement prior to closing from the holder of such lien, showing the correct balance due. 11. USE OF PURCHASE PRICE. At time of settlement, fiords of the purchase price may be used to pay taxes and other liens and to acquire outstanding interests, if any, of others. 12. APPROVAL OF COURT. If the Property is an asset of an estate, trust or conservatorship, this Agreement is contingent upon Court approval unless declared unnecessary by City's attorney. If the sale of the Property is subject to court approval, the fiduciary shall promptly submit this Agreement for such approval. If this Agreement is not so approved prior to the date of closing either party may declare this Agreement mill and void, and all payments made hereunder shall be returned to City. 13. REMEDIES OF THE PARTIES.. A. If City fails to timely perform this Agreement, Seller may forfeit it as provided in the Iowa Code (Chapter 656), and all payments made shall be forfeited; or, at Seller's option, upon thirty days written notice of intention to accelerate the payment of the entire balance because of City's default (during which thirty days the default is not corrected), Seller may declare the entire balance immediately due and payable. Thereafter this agreement may be foreclosed in equity and the Court may appoint a receiver. B. If Seller fails to timely perform this Agreement, City has the right to have all payments made returned to them. C. City and Seller are also entitled to utilize any and all other remedies or actions at law or in equity available to them and shall be entitled to obtain judgment for costs and attorney fees as permitted by law. 14. NOTICE. Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed served when it is delivered by personal delivery or by certified mail return receipt requested, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: City of Iowa City, City Clerk, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, Iowa 52240; Elks Lodge #590, 637 Foster Road, Iowa City, Iowa 52245 15. CERTIFICATION. Buyers and Seller; each certify that they are not acting, directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of any person, group, entity or nation named by any Executive Order or the United States Treasury Department as a terrorist, "Specially Designated National and Blocked Person" or any other banned or blocked person, entity, nation or transaction pursuant to any law, order, rule or regulation that is enforced or administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control; and are not engaged in this transaction, directly or indirectly on behalf of, any such person, group, entity or nation. Each party hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, risks, liabilities and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs) arising from or related to any breach of the foregoing certification. 16. GENERAL PROVISIONS. In the performance of each part of this Agreement, time shall be of the essence. Failure to promptly assert rights herein shall not, however, be a waiver of such rights or a waiver of any existing or subsequent default. This Agreement shall apply to and bind the successors in interest of the parties. Ibis Agreement shall survive the closing. Paragraph headings are for convenience of reference and shall not limit or affect the meaning of this Agreement. Words and phrases herein shall be construed as in the singular or plural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender according to the context. 17. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: A. ACCESS EASEMENT. Seller shall retain an easement to access Seller's remaining property to the West over, through and across the permanent easement area shown and described on Exhibit "B" hereto on terms substantially as set forth in Exhibit "C" hereto. B. SEPTIC SYSTEM/WELL. Seller will verify, in a form satisfactory to Buyer, that there is no septic system, or portion thereof, or well located on the Property. C. FENCING. City shall install six (6) foot tall fencing along the western line of the Property to the East of Seller's maintenance building (on the flat terrain, not on the hill as it ascends to Foster Road) with the material and design of the fencing to be determined in City's sole discretion. Said fencing shall be installed within 6 months of closing. This provision shall survive the closing. D. APPROVAL OF IOWA CITY ELKS LODGE #590 MEMBERSHIP. This Agreement is contingent upon the approval by the Iowa City Elks Lodge #590 Trustees, by the National Elks Board and by the membership of the Iowa City Elks Lodge #590, all in accordance with applicable rules, procedures and bylaws. Seller shall promptly submit this Agreement to the National Elks Board upon acceptance by Seller. If this Agreement is not so approved prior to March 1, 2020, the City may declare this Agreement null and void E. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. This agreement shall be subject to formal approval by City Council. If this Agreement is not so approved prior to March 1, 2020, the Seller may declare this Agreement null and void. 18. ACCEPTANCE. When accepted, this Agreement shall become a binding contract. If not accepted and delivered to City on or before the 30th of January 2020, this Agreement shall be null and void and all payments made shall be returned immediately to City. This Offer is presented to the Seller on this Z Z day of 2020. CITY OF IOWA CII`Y IOWA, BUYER BY: > Geoff F City Manager Accepted this 2K day of �/e.R 20 7,0 Iowa ityE s dge 0{SELLER) Addr o Iowa City, Iowa 52245 Telephone: POINT OF waMaMBmlr -.. j t @ MM FWT S81MMM rna—M�.@ rC94' ` YLtW my ua @ mnwew m MUMww®'� � a �c, v w,rs mmn ETM- zr .`5 1 Lay O AUDROEMaARCEL 1 r = >=Av. EXHIBIT PLAT OF SURVEY AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019-136 IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA N=6N4'@AQO-'i� Wa@R1m1E1M •M®1@w'AIYRIN)tllC,Oa lil,[ep�lw'wi @llwl.a� mI@�O,Vw-baaaa.® �6011YIYw@w � �\Y�1C,5.O0®OTI.T. la1C,,.lOwl-w IYCw,a'l,R l6lgw,ItlGOKWIIq �10110@I-Y mnrn�mia[ wuww.msrw vwv,wro�u vwC@.Tala ,MbYM�al� � o�.+awwi.v.w,moe wa@c�'+aiena ��', �� Omtlw-M POINT OF waMaMBmlr -.. j t @ MM FWT S81MMM rna—M�.@ rC94' ` YLtW my ua @ mnwew m MUMww®'� � a �c, v w,rs mmn ETM- zr .`5 1 Lay O AUDROEMaARCEL 1 r = >=Av. EXHIBIT PLAT OF SURVEY AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019-136 IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA N=6N4'@AQO-'i� YY YYaaZ- L� oa w,nvfwnr�Nm� wonrsa• '• VYSI9EYWo lotpw 4TaP>owue.o6l�mxra• ��', ®+wamvwvntlmm.vm avmewar.wr a�.�-wumaesrAwc¢a+w A 1VRIml M DDY� lm I a 86O¢1 a TONN9@ >e PnRIFI µ1a awm. a 118 RSM 1 atlot tliY. �mvo, V�{011v.IR'lA CEMRRm A{ RaIAR s YY YYaaZ- L� MA MA uroKAMM LAMUR4FY0114 LRMMAPEAF20M SiKf MMALSWAMM +maweavn. wAmvfiReim . 1. ,w+l Ma,wwaww PLAT OF SURVEY AUOROFY9 PARLB 2018-136 APOFMONOF 60VE MWJff LM7W fEW=4.70'M88p79 NOIrnLNA Gv w. Lff UMAN IOWACITY IO HNnoN COU7t7Y WS CO.WSULTMM MM 110-2M19 wrg mar F o�8-$TO i 1•t ®11Y p®ApgJ UK LOCATION: CURVEYFECUS@MM. APOROONCFOOVeU/F =70F5 141/, CRYOFN CIWENCflR73iNGbSV iMEN[ iOtWSN.RTCNORR�PNiOC6VIFPI.OFTNE FDIH CMCCEMFIMMCING PRRlCNAL MERIOINI, IOIIMRIY,.IONNSON COIRRY. IDWALBTY, IWA ICN0 ICN& VLIO RUIIVEYOR BV0.UNN0 Feld OR ORbW6A11flL PROPNETORORO FICR R NONORIYP.LS M P CRY IOOGELODaVE BB1 031ERRM0 MMSCONMTAIM M I0Yi4CIIY.I0AR6B14E 1�111iWTN¢ReEFTSRIFEf D0C11NENT RETURN wwAam IONACRY, KWA. &IM P31C S177's' uNDSLINVETOR OATEOF EUFVEY: 11.18.8818 L Gf SPEMEN H PLAT INGRESS AND EGRESS IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, 10 1 ®; ®YLIh'I dfJ9te1IU DESCRIPTION -INGRESS AND EGRESS EASEMENT i 3 III w A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 OF SECTION 4, wAm 1m,B RYia I Q,m.�,a•,K TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PO$[91 d'9Md3S'S ROM 2®913a� f A I PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. nning at the NoMwast Comer of Lot 5 of 'Plat of Survey in GOA Lot 7 Seo, 4 TWp, 79 N. RS W of the M P.M.", In accordance —�Y — with the Plat thareof Recorded In Plat Book 3 at Page 225 of the Retmrdo of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence SSS°3708"W, 261.62 Y\j\ 21 I feel; Thence N18°3T55`W, 50.47 fit; �� a Thence N55°32'W E, 253.07 feet; Thence S25°2T30^E, 50.01164 1 OF IM S9S� R {AT 7 SEC, to She Point of Beginning. Said Ingram and Egress Easement P -U-' ulna 12,887 square feet and is subject to sacemards and restric icna of record. owe M T8 to OR& MCSCNENR$T WIw LEGEND AND NOTES • _ �BIIBpRY t•n�RFJ¢(B7. RYD Is mYe —•------'--- wcxr-u-Rar LRus — - LBMNI Lace. -LOT IBE],1pMRgTfEE ®1 R ----------- KIM RECOMD A• PNCE RniE9 —_ LM7 - BMeMRw:s OBm IOBD OBBRBbT. wL�sm'7Re N RxT ma MDQbifA Am r l wrwa9 by t ° e1piRMe RLTIEM"�F62J8 EASEMENT PLAT APORTIONOF LOT7 OF SECfWN4, � TOMSHIP79NORn{ RANGrOWUST.OFTHE If FIFTH PRWCIPALMSMIAN a IOWACITY JOHNSON COUNTY lnwe _ °1, TERMS OF PERMANENT ACCESS EASEMENT 1. A permanent access easement and a right-of-way with right of ingress and egress thereto, over, through and across the permanent easement area shown and described on Exhibit "B" ("Easement Area") for accessing Seller's property to the West of Auditor's Parcel 2019-136. 2. The access easement shall include the following rights in connection with the above uses: a. The right, from time to time, to trim and cut down and clear away all trees and brush on the Easement Area which now or hereafter interfere in any manner with Seller's exercise of its rights herein. b. The right, after reasonable notice to Buyer, to enter onto land beyond the Easement Area and conduct repair and maintenance which may extend minimally beyond the Easement Area- In the event of such repair and maintenance, Seller shall restore said Easement Area and the land beyond the Easement Area substan- tially to its prior condition. 3. Seller shall be responsible for repair and maintenance of the Easement Area G ad Q^y vNete5s"ciy i h�fzv�M�+tSi SkJjcc.� j-& U�^y--rSG,P P roJeiti kA;c1A 4. Seller shall indemnify Buyer against loss or damage which occurs as a result of Seller's W, I exercise of its easement rights and repair s00maintenance of the Easement Area n 4 (oC 9Yu! im�2'Vtnv+rtS S. The terms of the easement shall inure to the benefit of and bind the successors and assigns of Seller and Buyer and shall be deemed to run with the land and with the title to y �� the land. Akelcx �� IZNItrD �� Iti1�tio Item Number: 7.b. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Water Division of the Public Works Department by deleting one full-time Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position and adding one full-time Maintenance Worker I — Water Customer Service position and amending the AFSCME pay plan by deleting the position Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position, grade 2. Prepared By: Kevin Slutts, Water Division Superintendent Reviewed By: Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Karen Jennings, Human Resources Administrator Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: Increase in personnel wages of $1,289.60 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: The existing Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position in the Water Divivison was recently vacated. After evaluating the needs of the organization, the management team has determined that a Maintenance Worker I — Water Customer Service position would better serve the needs of the City. Therefore, the Water Division seeks approval to eliminate the Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position and to add a Maintenance Worker I — Water Customer Service. Background /Analysis: The existing Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position in the Water Division was recently vacated. The needs of the Water Division have been reviewed and reassessed. It has been determined that meter reading need not be exclusive to a single Water Customer Service position. The meter reading will be shared amongst the Maintenance Worker I — Customer Service staff. The additional Maintenance Worker I — Customer Service position will then be better able to assist with meter maintenance, change -outs, and increase the number of staff in the on-call rotation. This then increases the current and future sustainability and cross -training of division staff. The Maintenance Worker I — Water Customer Service position is an existing job listed at an AFSCME paygrade 3. The Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position is at an AFSCME paygrade 2. Replacing the paygrade 2 position with a paygrade 3 position will result in a net increase in annual wages of $1,289.60. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Kevin Slutts, Water Superintendent, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)3565162 Resolution No. 20-22 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Water Division of the Public Works Department by deleting one full-time Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position and adding one full-time Maintenance Worker I — Water Customer Service position and amending the AFSCME pay plan by deleting the position Maintenance Worker I — Meter Reader position, grade 2. Whereas, Resolution 19-79 adopted by the City Council on March 12, 2019, authorized budgeted positions in the Water Division of the Public Works Department for Fiscal Year 2020; and Whereas, Resolution No. 17-14, adopted by the City Council on January 3, 2017 established a classification and compensation plan for AFSCME employees; and Whereas, the Maintenance Worker I - Meter Reader position was vacated when the existing employee resigned due to finding a new position internal to the City; and Whereas, the focus of the Maintenance Worker I - Meter Reader position has been reading meters; and Whereas, the needs of the division would be better served by replacing the vacant Maintenance Worker I - Meter Reader position with a Maintenance Worker I -Water Customer Service position. Now, Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The budgeted positions in the Water Division of the Public Works Department be amended by: a. Deleting one full-time Maintenance Worker I - Meter Reader position, grade 2. b. Adding one full-time Maintenance Worker I -Water Customer Service, grade 3. 2. The AFSCME pay plan be amended by deleting the position Maintenance Worker I - Meter Reader, grade 2. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020 r AID ved by Attest: a 1/0 Cit Clerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by salih an seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes X Nays: Thomas the Resolution be Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 7.c. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the Spruce Street Water Main Replacement Project. Prepared By: Joe Welter, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $221,610.93 available in the First Avenue (400-500 Block) Water Main Replacement, Account Number W3212 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Location Map Resolution Executive Summary: For the Spruce Street Water Main Replacement Project, Watersmith Engineering of Muscatine, Iowa, designed water main improvements for the west side of Spruce Street, between Deforest and Friendly Avenues. The Project Manual was approved at the January 7, 2020 Council Meeting. The engineer's estimated costs for construction of the proposed system was $276,702. One addendum was issued during the bidding that included minor clarifications. Four bids were submitted prior to the January 28, 2020 deadline: Bidder Name City Bid • B.G. Brecke, Inc. Cedar Rapids, Iowa $221,610.93 • Boomerang Corp Anamosa, Iowa $248,385.00 • Lynch Excavating West Branch, Iowa $264,138.75 • Dave Schmitt Construction Co., Inc. Cedar Rapids, Iowa $277,380.00 B.G. Brecke, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $221,610.93. Staff recommends awarding the Contract for the Spruce Street Water Main Replacement Project to B.G. Brecke, Inc. Background /Analysis: This project includes approximately 900 feet of 8" polyvinyl chloride (PVC) water main installed by directional drill method on the west side of Spruce Street between Deforest Avenue and Friendly Avenue/Lower Muscatine Road. In addition, the construction activities will include the associated copper water services, traffic control, and sidewalk and pavement removal and restoration. Throughout the project, trenchless installation methods will be used to minimize disturbances to roads, sidewalks, trees, and other surface features. Despite this, during the restoration of water services the project will disturb portions of the right-of-way, driveways, street, and sidewalks. ATTACHMENTS: Description Location Map Resolution N Spruce St Water Main Replacement 11 1� 0111. ip aC, Cy Friendly Ave Cn Cn Al 14 C/) Highland Ave y 1 i rR f Deforest Ave L- Prepared by: Joe Wetter, Public Works, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 (319) 356-5144 Resolution No. 20-23 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the Spruce Street Water Main Replacement Project. Whereas, B.G. Brecke, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, has submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $221,610.93 for construction of the above-named project; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Spruce St. (1300-1400 Block) Water Main Replacement Project - Account # W3216; and Whereas, the City Engineer and City Manager are authorized to execute change orders according to the City's Purchasing Policy as they may become necessary in the construction of the above- named project. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The contract for the construction of the above-named project is hereby awarded to B.G. Brecke, Inc., subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest the contract for construction of the above-named project, subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020 Attest : k::" � L City Jerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by Salih adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X X X X x X and seconded by Nays: .I C, -l9 Thomas the Resolution be Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 7.d. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the McCollister Boulevard Extension Project. Prepared By: Melissa Clow, Special Projects Administrator Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Location Map Resolution Executive Summary: AECOM of Waterloo, IA designed the McCollister Boulevard Extension to connect from its intersection with Gilbert Street to the existing roundabout on Sycamore Street. The Project Manual and Estimate of Cost were approved at the January 7, 2020 City Council Meeting. The engineer's estimate of cost for construction was $3,911,000.00. Three addenda were issued during the bidding to provide minor clarifications and to respond to questions from contractors. Five bids were submitted to the City Clerk prior to the deadline on January 28, 2020. Bidder Name City Total Bid Amount Metro Pavers, Inc. Iowa City, IA $4,020,012.36 Boomerang Corporation Anamosa, IA $4,087,748.77 Streb Construction Company, Inc. Iowa City, IA $4,355,937.04 All American Concrete, Inc. West Liberty, IA $4,450,771.93 Portzen Construction Dubuque, IA $5,094,922.18 Background /Analysis: With more development occurring in the south district, McCollister Boulevard is being extended to provide an arterial street between Gilbert Street and Sycamore Street. The new roadway will have a 100' ROW with a 20' center median and 17.5' travel lanes consisting of 11' vehicular lanes and 6.5' bicycle lanes. A 6' sidewalk will be located on the north side of the roadway and a 10' sidewalk will be located on the south side, connecting to the regional trail network. The project also includes 16" water main, new storm and sanitary sewer, fiber and electric conduit and street lights in the corridor. Traffic Signals will be installed at the Gilbert Street intersection. The project is expected to be completed in the Fall of 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Description Location Map Resolution McCollister Boulevard Extension - - M oxo - MCCO�C/ �YZ/Y . NpFt •r� A01-6 DICKENSON LN – 1' "• – — .f Q�\�\�pR •O � HEMINGWAY LN � SHERMAN DR `��S'T m v _ y . Y i ► ANGENBERG AVE F,Q r A i cn w O Q U } U �Z O - �O - ' DANIEL PL Prepared by: Melissa A. Clow, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)356-5413 Resolution No. 20-24 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the McCollister Boulevard Extension Project Whereas, Metro Pavers, Inc. of Iowa City, IA, has submitted the lowest responsible bid of $4,020,012.36 for construction of the above-named project; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the McCollister Boulevard Extension account # S3934; and Whereas, the City Engineer and City Manager are authorized to execute change orders according to the City's Purchasing Policy as they may become necessary in the construction of the above- named project. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The contract for the construction of the above-named project is hereby awarded to Metro Pavers, Inc., subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest the contract for construction of the above-named project, subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. Passed and approved this 4th day of February _,2020 Mefyck p oved Attest : /- DOI City Jerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by salih adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: by 'Thomas the Resolution be Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 8.a. �r -4 "m ot r4" N CITY OE IOWA CITY www.icgov.org February 4, 2020 Motion setting a public hearing for February 18 on an ordinance to amend Title 14, Zoning related to animal -related commercial uses. (REZ19-14) F -11A ETIJ:ILTA I Wl1111 PI Description Council Memo Staff Report with Attachments � r CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE CITY O F IOWA C1TY MEMORANDUM Date: February 4, 2020 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Re: Amendment to Title 14, Zoning of the Iowa City Code Related to Animal Related Commercial Uses in CH -1 Zones (ZCA19-06) Background On January 16, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a text amendment of the zoning code related to animal related commercial uses. The proposed amendment: 1. Allows animal related commercial uses as a provisional use in the Highway Commercial (CH -1) zone; 2. Expands the definition of animal related commercial uses to include animal daycare and indoor animal recreation; and 3. Allows private outdoor animal recreational areas as an accessory use to an animal related commercial use subject to a special exception in the CH -1 zone. This memo clarifies the differences between the City's current code language pertaining to animal related commercial uses in CH -1 zones and the proposed. Overview of Proposed Amendments Table 1 compares how animal related commercial uses are currently allowed versus how they are proposed to be allowed. Table 1. General Animal Related Commercial Uses by Zonina District Zoning District CO -1 CN -1 CH -1 CI -1 CC -2 CB -2 CB -5 CB -10 MU Current S PR PR PR PR PR Proposed S PR PR PR PR PR PR Key: S = Special Exception, which requires review and approval by the Board of Adjustment PR = Provisional, which requires review and approval by staff Currently, general animal related commercial uses, whether allowable via special exception or as a provisional use, must abide by use specific criteria. These criteria include the requirement that all uses be conducted completely indoors within a soundproofed building. The proposed amendment will not change this requirement. Table 2 outlines the changes that would add more examples of general animal related commercial uses. Specifically, staff is proposing to clarify that animal daycare and indoor animal recreation are examples of general animal related commercial uses. Animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses must meet the same use specific criteria that other use examples must meet with respect to soundproofing. The proposed amendment will clarify that animal daycare does not include the overnight boarding of animals. January 28, 2020 Page 2 Table 2. General Animal Related Commercial, Examples of Uses Current Proposed Veterinary clinics; animal grooming Veterinary clinics; animal grooming establishments; pet crematoriums establishments; pet crematoriums; NEW: animal daycare, indoor animal recreation Lastly, the proposed amendment allows for private outdoor animal recreation areas to be allowed as an accessory use to an animal related commercial use in the Highway Commercial (CH -1) zone. These accessory uses would only be allowed through the Board of Adjustment Special Exception process and be subject to the following use specific criteria: 1. Private outdoor animal recreation areas must be located at least 400' from any residential zone. 2. No private outdoor animal recreational uses are allowed overnight. 3. All private outdoor animal recreation areas must have secure fencing in place so that animals cannot escape. 4. Animals shall not be permitted in a private outdoor animal recreation area unless a handler is present. 5. Where private outdoor animal recreation facilities are accessed by the public, a double -entry gate is required. 6. All private outdoor animal recreation areas must be kept in a clean, dry, and sanitary condition. 7. Private outdoor animal recreation areas shall be located in an interior side or rear yard and screened from any right-of-way or adjacent residential zone by at least the S2 screening standard. CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE Date: January 16, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Re: Amendment to Title 14, Zoning of the Iowa City Code Related to Animal Related Commercial Uses in CH -1 Zones (ZCA19-06) Background on Proposed Amendments The City has been approached by Phil O'Brien regarding future development of a community based dog recreation center located at 2513 N. Dodge St. in Iowa City. The subject location is currently zoned Highway Commercial (CH -1). This zoning designation does not allow animal related commercial establishments, which is the commercial land use that staff feels is most appropriate for the proposed development. Highway Commercial zoning in the subject location fits the directive of the comprehensive plan. However, due to the subject location's distance from residential zones and adjacency to more intense land uses, staff is supportive of text amendments to the animal related commercial land use that will best fit the proposed development. Background on the Proposed Community Based Indoor Dog Park and Recreation Center The proposed community based indoor dog park and recreation center is planned to be approximately 22,000 square feet in size and feature a full-service restaurant, retail space, pet friendly colab office spaces, rentable meeting spaces, an elevated on -leash dog walking track, over 15,000 square feet of agility and modular space for off -leash activities or custom events, and a dog friendly diving/pool area. Being mostly indoors, with some contained outdoor space and walking trails, the developer maintains that the facility would have minimal impact to any neighborhood businesses in the way of sound or outdoor activities. The developer believes the center will draw from a regional customer base. The developer's research shows this location as being ideal for the future success of the project. Aside from the recreation center component, these uses described above are allowed by right in a CH -1 zone. Current Regulations Per section 14 -4A -4B of the City Code, Animal Related Commercial Uses are defined as commercial services related to the temporary care, medical treatment, or cremation of domestic animals. Uses are divided into two subgroups, general and intensive, based on the intensity of the use, outdoor activity on the site, and the potential for noise and odor related externalities. Table 1.0 provides examples of animal related commercial uses for each subgroup. January 10, 2020 Page 2 Table 1.0 Animal Related Commercial Subgroup: Examples of Uses: General Veterinary clinics; animal grooming establishments; pet crematoriums Intensive Kennels; stables Table 2.0 shows which zones currently allow general animal related commercial uses as a provisional use or via special exception. Intensive animal related commercial uses are allowed as a provisional use, only in Intensive Commercial, CI -1 zones. Table 2.0 Use Subgroups CO -1 CN -1 CH -1 CI -1 CC -2 C13-2 C13-5 CB- MU Categories 10 Animal General S PR PR PR PR PR Related Intensive PR Commercial The proposed text amendment would not change how stand-alone veterinary clinics, animal grooming establishments, pet crematoriums, kennels, or stables would be regulated. Proposed Code Amendments Staff is proposing to amend the code to allow general animal related commercial uses as a provisional use in Highway Commercial (CH -1) zones. In addition, staff is proposing to amend the code to allow animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses as allowable provisional general animal related commercial uses. These two additional uses would be allowed in provisionally in CN -1, CH -1, CI -1, CC - 2, CB -2, and CB -5 zones. Both animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses would need to abide by existing additional criteria requiring provisional general animal related commercial uses to be conducted completely indoors, in a soundproofed building. The following definitions are proposed for animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses. Animal Daycare: A nonresidential facility offering care for domestic animals during daytime hours, not during overnight hours. Indoor Animal Recreation: An indoor facility used for the exercise, recreation, or training of domestic animals. Staff is also proposing to amend the code to allow private outdoor animal recreation uses via special exception in CH -1 zones. This amendment is not intended to regulate or otherwise constrain the keeping of household pets, or the development of public recreation facilities such as public dog parks. The special exception process would require all outdoor animal recreation uses to obtain approval from the City's Board of Adjustment. Staff is proposing the following additional approval criteria to obtain a special exception for outdoor animal recreation uses. 1. Outdoor animal recreation areas must be located at least 400' from any residential zone. January 10, 2020 Page 3 2. No outdoor animal recreation uses are allowed overnight. 3. All outdoor animal recreation areas must be fully enclosed by a fence that is of sufficient height to prevent animals from escaping. 4. Animals shall not be permitted in an outdoor animal recreation area unless a handler is present. 5. Where outdoor animal recreation facilities are accessed by the public, a double -entry gate is required. 6. All outdoor animal recreation areas must be kept in a clean, dry, and sanitary condition. The following definition is proposed for an outdoor animal recreation use. Private Outdoor Animal Recreation: An outdoor facility used for the exercise, recreation, or training of domestic animals. Rationale for Text Amendments The purpose of the Highway Commercial (CH -1) zone is to permit development of service uses relating to expressways or along arterial roadways. The applicant for the text amendment maintains that the proposed development of a community based indoor dog park and recreation center at 2513 N. Dodge Street will have a regional draw, making the proposed highway adjacent location convenient for the business' patronage. The majority of the City's current CH -1 zoning is clustered around N. Dodge Street, to the north and south of the Interstate 80 interchange. Each CH -1 parcel is within 1/3 of a mile of the Dodge Street and Interstate 80 interchange. The map in Figure 1.0 shows how each CH -1 parcel is bordered by either Mixed Use or Commercial Office zoning, which allows for significant distance separation between outdoor animal recreation uses and any residential uses. By requiring that outdoor animal recreation locations obtain a special exception, a public process is put in place to ensure that any concerns posed by residents, workers, and stakeholders are acknowledged. Staff feels that the provisional requirement for soundproofing in buildings with general animal related commercial uses is sufficient for the proposed new uses, animal daycare and indoor animal recreation. Figure 1.0 January 10, 2020 Page 4 Comparison to Peer Zoning Ordinances Table 3.0 shows a comparison of peer zoning ordinances pertaining to animal related services. Staff borrowed certain additional approval criteria from these peer ordinances. City Commercial Uses Allowed Applicable Zones Additional Criteria Use Designation Des Moines Animal • Boarding • Industrial Outdoor exercise Services • Grooming • Intense areas must be at • Stable commercial least 200' from • Veterinary • Mixed-use residential zones. • Downtown. Cedar Rapids Outdoor animal Areas for: • Urban • Must be 100' runs (accessory • Animal • Traditional from to Animal & Pet training • Suburban residential Sales/Service • Exercise • Public zones Use) • Recreation • Screened • Other from public activities. ROW • Overnight boarding not permitted outdoors. Davenport Animal Care • Veterinary • Commercial • 6' high min. Facility (Small) • Boarding (Day • Mixed -Use fence height. & Overnight) • Agricultural • Overnight • Grooming boarding not • Training permitted outdoors. • Animal exercise areas must be sanitary. Next Steps Pending recommendation of approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council must hold a public hearing to consider the proposed text amendments. Recommendation Staff recommends amending the City Code to allow the following: 1. Allow general animal related commercial uses as a provisional use in Highway Commercial (CH -1) zones. 2. The creation of animal daycare and indoor animal recreation uses as general animal related commercial uses as provisional uses in CN -1, CH -1, CI -1, CC -2, CB -2, and CB -5 zones. 3. Allow outdoor animal recreation uses via special exception in CH -1 zones January 10, 2020 Page 5 Attachments: 1. Applicant Statement on Proposed Development Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Request for Rezoning The project planned for 2513 N. Dodge St in Iowa City will be a community based indoor dog park and recreation center. It will be a 22,000 sq ft facility that will include a full service restaurant, retail space, pet friendly colab office spaces, rentable meeting spaces, elevated on -leash walking track, 15,000+ sq ft of agility and modular space for off leash activities or custom events and a dog friendly diving/pool area. Local partners working on the project include Shive Hattery, Axiom, Meld Marketing and more. We feel the request is warranted so we can maximize our services and benefits to the community and our clients while having little to no effect on the neighboring businesses or area as a whole. Being mostly indoors, with some contained outdoor space and walking trails, the facility would have minimal impact to any neighboring businesses in the way of sound or outdoor activities. The lot is also located at the end of a smaller contained commercial area, therefore minimizing the number of and direct contact of neighboring businesses. We believe our pet friendly community center will be a benefit to the local hotel and restaurants in the area, along with bringing more jobs and services to our local market. The center will be planned as a destination business drawing not only local, but regional patrons that will utilize these neighboring businesses. In addition, the improvements to the land will add a tasteful use of space that will coincide with the future renovations of the current Clarion Hotel. With the growing number of pets and furry family members in our community, our community center will help promote healthy exercise and educational activities for our customers without having to leave their pups at home. Our plan is to promote an active and inclusive lifestyle for everyone. Our research shows this location to be ideal for the future success of our project. With a few changes to the local code and with a beneficial impact to the neighboring businesses, I would like to opportunity to bring a unique and positive service to our community. Thank you for your consideration and I am happy to offer any additional business plans or answer any questions. Best Regards, Phil O'Brien ,:a -- wM r* , = w� .. � ► f m r+o kr) Item Number: 8.b. CITY OF IOWA CITY `�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution setting a public hearing on February 18, 2020 on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Robert A Lee Recreation Center Phase 2 Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Ben Clark, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Juli Seydell Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost of construction is $370,000 and will be funded through the Recreation Center ADA Improvements account # R4351 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item begins the bidding process for the Robert A Lee Recreation Center Phase 2 Improvements Project. The project includes renovations to existing pool deck restrooms, racquetball court, game room and building fire alarm system. All improvements will be compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations. Background /Analysis: The 2017 Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Building Improvements Study determined the priority improvements for the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center. These improvements will improve the user experience, update building systems, and improve the overall usability of the space. This project addresses those needs outlined in the 2017 study. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Ben Clark, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5436 Resolution No. 20-25 Resolution setting a public hearing on February 18, 2020 on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Robert A Lee Recreation Center Phase 2 Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Recreation Center ADA Improvements account # R4351. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above- mentioned project is to be held on the 18m day of February, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this 4th day of February _'2020 Ma &) oved by Attest: �� ✓ / / - Z — 21� Cit Clerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by salih an seconded by Thomas the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were Ayes: N Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner 8,b Item Number: 8.c. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution Setting a Public Hearing on setting the maximum property tax levy for certain levies for the proposed budget ending June 30, 2021. Prepared By: Jacklyn Fleagle, Budget & Compliance Officer Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: Approved as part of the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Max Levy Hearing Notice Resolution Executive Summary: The State legislature adopted new law changes regarding the annual budgeting process. Cities are now required to hold a public hearing to set a maximum property tax levy for certain levies. Background /Analysis: In the Spring of 2019, the State law changes incorporated new regulations surrounding the management of the annual budget process. In addition to being adopted as part of the budget, which is subject to a public hearing, a maximum property tax levy for certain levies is now required to be approved by the City Council by resolution prior to the adoption and public hearing for the operating budget. The levies required to be included in the maximum property tax levy are non -voted levies, which for the City of Iowa City include the Regular General Levy, the Transit Levy, the Tort Levy, the Emergency Levy, and Employee Benefits related levies. The total maximum property tax levy for the affected levies is $53,930,125 and the calculated maximum tax rate for the affected levies is $12.92459. The Library Levy and the Debt Service Levy are not affected by this State law change. Those levy rates are $.27 and $2.57846, respectively. The proposed total combined property tax levy rate is $15.77305, which is $.06 lower than the total combined levy rate for fiscal year 2020. The Ag Land Levy rate is also not affected and remains at $3.00375, and the SSMI D Levy rate is not affected and remains at $2.00. The notice of public hearing is to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in Iowa City, not less than ten days and no more than 20 days before the public hearing, as well as published on the City's website and social media pages. The chosen publication date is February 7, 2020. If the property tax dollars requested result in a greater than 102% increase from the previous fiscal year, a two-thirds majority vote approval is needed. The City does have a proposed maximum property tax for certain levies increase in excess of 102%, and will therefore need approval from five out of the seven Council members. ATTACHMENTS: Description Max hearing notice Resolution CITY NAME NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVY CITY CODE Iowa City I Fiscal Year July 1, 2020 -June 30, 2021 52-483 The Citv Council will conduct a Dublic hearina on the Dr000sed Fiscal Year City Drooertv tax levv as follows: Meeting Date: Meeting Time: Meeting Location: 2/18/2020 T 1 410 E Washington St, City Hall At the public hearing any resident or taxpayer may present objections to, or arguments in favor of the proposed tax levy. After adoption of the proposed tax levy, the Council will publish notice and hold a hearing on the proposed city budget. icgov.org (319) 356-5041 Iowa Department of Management Current Year Certified Budget Year Effective Budget Year Proposed Annual Property Tax Property Tax Maximum Property Tax 2019/2020 2020/2021** 2020/2021 %CHG K Levies: Regular General 2 Contract for Use of Bridge 3 Opr & Maint Publicly Owned Transit 4 Rent, Ins. Maint. Of Non -Owned Civ. Ctr. 5 Opr & Maint of City -Owned Civic Center 6 Planning a Sanitary Disposal Project 7 Liability, Property & Self -Insurance Costs 8 Support of Local Emer. Mgmt. Commission 9 Emergency 10 Police & Fire Retirement 11 FICA & IPERS 12 Other Employee Benefits 13 *Total 384.15A Maximum Tax Levy 14 Calculated 384.15A MaximumTax Rate 15 of sianificant increases in the $30,832,760 $30,832,760 $33,798,675 $0 $0 $0 $3,616,188 $3,616,188 $3,964,042 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,105,564 $1,105,564 $1,211,912 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,001,442 $3,731,297 $3,731,297 $4,090,224 $3,721,172 $3,721,172 $4,079,124 $4,896,433 $4,896,433 $5,784,706 $47,903,414 $47,903,414 $53,930,125 $12.58459 $11.48026 $12.92459 it increases in the budget are the result of several different City Council strategic initiatives, including the addition of permanent staff, an in temporary employee wages, maintaining Affordable Housing initiatives, and expanding Climate Change and social justice programs . Ily, health insurance costs increased by 16% in fiscal year 2020 and are expected to increase another 10% in fiscal year 2021, and wages grew by approxiamtely 4%. *Total city tax rate will also include voted general fund levy, debt service levy, and capital improvement reserve levy **Budget year effective property tax rate is the rate that would be assessed for these levies if the dollars requested is not changed in the coming budgetyear Prepared by: Jacklyn Fleagle, Budget & Compliance Officer, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)356-5063 Resolution No. 20-26 Resolution setting public hearing on setting the maximum property tax levy for certain levies for the proposed budget ending June 30, 2021. Be it resolved by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, that a public hearing will be held in Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 East Washington Street, at 7:00 p.m., February 18, 2020, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk, to permit any citizen to be heard for or against the setting of a maximum property tax levy for certain property tax levies for the budget year ending June 30, 2021. The City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of said public hearing and time and place thereof by publication in the Iowa City Press -Citizen, a newspaper of general circulation in Iowa City, not less than ten (10) days and not more than twenty (20) days before the time set for such hearing. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020 . r Attest: % Ci Clerk Approved by 0 /-2$ _ z_0 City Attorney's Office It was moved by salih and seconded by Thomas the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X X X X X X Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 11.b. >< _ 4 CITY OE IOWA CITY www.icgov.org February 4, 2020 Resolution approving Preliminary Plat of 218 Commercial Park subdivision, a 32.96 -acre, five lot commercial subdivision with nine outlots located in unincorporated Johnson County south of Route 218 and Riverside Drive. (SUB19-16) ATTACHMENTS: Description Council memo Revised Preliminary Plat P&Z Staff Report with Attachments P&Z Minutes Letter from Mayor Teague Resolution � r CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE CITY O F IOWA C1TY MEMORANDUM Date: February 4, 2020 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Re: Summary of Revisions to the 218 Commercial Park Preliminary Plat and Rezoning (CZ19-05 and SUB19-16) Background After holding several discussions with County Planning staff, the applicant for the 218 Commercial Park Preliminary Plat and Rezoning, decided to reduce the scale of the originally proposed development. This memo is intended to provide a summary to the City Council of revisions to the 218 Commercial Park Preliminary Plat and Rezoning applications. These revisions were submitted to staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission one day prior to the Commission's meeting on January 16, 2020. The Commission recommended denial of the rezoning (0-6) and, in the event that the rezoning was approved, recommended approval of the revised preliminary plat (4-2). A subsequent revised plat, showing an additional outlot for stormwater management, was submitted on January 27, 2020. Changes to the Rezoning Table 1 below highlights the revisions to the rezoning. The revised rezoning reduces the number of applicable lots from 3 to 2, and reduces the applicable acreage from 65.15 total acres to 32.96 acres. Parcel number 3, shown in Figure 1 as Outlot A, is removed from the revised rezoning. This parcel was originally planned to be rezoned to County Highway Commercial. Under the revised rezoning proposal, this parcel will remain zoned as County Residential (Figure 2). While City staff believes that the reduced, revised rezoning is an improvement over the originally proposed 65.15 -acre rezoning, the reduced 32.96 -acre rezoning to County Commercial still conflicts with the Fringe Area Agreement. Table 1 Current Zoning Originally Proposed Rezoning Revised Proposed Rezoning Acreage County Agricultural County Commercial County Commercial 32.96 (32.87 acres) & County Residential (0.09 acres) County Residential County Highway Removed from 32.19 acres removed Commercial rezoning request January 29, 2020 Page 2 Figure 1 — Original Rezoning Exhibit REZONING EXHIBIT wa�TaFN�,o w',4. x,4 _ soumEtsrauaTsaae,ws sov:wr-.�sr ounwifn aF sscrMi mEww�xrTiou M d£4T%!dl-'RaxPPW 4FdRCF �:.. aslre Nannm•enouPx:[Nor iwE woxiMFasi ouwwxN nw�nwRilav of ^'6Ps'ua�G• % /�� TMiwOw,wes5re�uonT�w pnPNGv iu6uEwtHwFe5TMCN1Mr:R ONCSEC�T�ow ss, ui 0[ JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA M nff— t e _ cntLxNlELxs _ wuvavPrw .m .,1 Nm� —__ _- _ wilKcuFenLtts �� ¢° REZONING VAaCEtmNO•a�-"K-TOON"� .V '''V •�"•••,• I __—�_-- _ � !f fKAke tb'fI1XkPW V': �' FzamrvG exNlerc Ir e xiV :IC'iN' � iFLWCN4 , ._ _ c{w� I � JOHNSON COU N — Canhxt Hdtl A"6 MMS CONSNCTANi31Nc. 1-514 = e!L Ox aYTiflbXlR PE ^,tx 4 YCCIIFX 9inixX@'N "w.icnx. ".e 1 .� � �i al MS': fiF-9-012 Figure 2 — Revised Rezoning Exhibit MA'fN-SFM MEIN -9i 11E w .. '" sFrn9a'N14=xal4 xae.nw�uxe �.nyy� Y REZONING EXHIBIT - JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA z H � - fEC:iCN:A-:'I:M-h'.+ L44— RA M N� laxo aAxnfis uxn sxn'�ruE3 wuncucerr InEcls cmnaM�xruSPcxllsrs JQ4NSON COlIN1Y 3 OWA VMs COrvsu_inNis WC.= January 29, 2020 Page 3 Changes to the Preliminary Plat Table 2 below highlights the revisions to the preliminary plat. The revised preliminary plat reduces the number of lots intended for immediate development from 11 to 5, reducing the immediately developable acreage in half. The attached original and revised preliminary plats show how the subdivision layout reduces the number of planned new streets from 3 to 1, with the revised plat showing an extension of Izaak Walton Road SE to the west, terminating in a cul-de-sac. Both the revised and original subdivision designs show Outlot B as dedicated for stormwater detention, however the most recent plat shows some stormwater management taking place in Outlot I. Outlots C and E are shown as having future open space in both versions, with Outlot D being reserved for future street infrastructure. Because the proposed subdivision meets the Fringe Area Agreement's Rural Design Standards, in the event that the rezoning is approved, staff is recommending approval of the revised preliminary plat. Table 2 Recommendation Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission continue to recommend that Council send a letter to the County recommending that the Board of Supervisors deny this rezoning application, despite its reduction in size. Although the revised rezoning is less intense than the original application, the Fringe Area Agreement still stipulates that the uses in this portion of the Fringe Area shall be consistent with a Rural/Agricultural area, as indicated in the Johnson County Land Use Plan and as designated in Chapter 8 of the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. A commercial zoning designation, of any size, violates the intent of this Agreement. Staff and P&Z found that the revised preliminary plat meets the Rural Design Standards set forth in the Fringe Area Agreement, and therefore, in the event that the Board of Supervisors does rezone the property as requested, would recommend Council approve the preliminary plat. Attachments: 1. Revised Preliminary Plat, Received January 27, 2020 Original Proposed Plat Revised Proposed Plat Lots for Immediate Development 11 5 Acreage for Immediate Development 16.05 8.09 Outlots for Future Development 1 4 Acreage for Future Development 31.39 39.57 Outlots for Open Space/I nfrastructure 4 5 New Streets 3 1 Recommendation Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission continue to recommend that Council send a letter to the County recommending that the Board of Supervisors deny this rezoning application, despite its reduction in size. Although the revised rezoning is less intense than the original application, the Fringe Area Agreement still stipulates that the uses in this portion of the Fringe Area shall be consistent with a Rural/Agricultural area, as indicated in the Johnson County Land Use Plan and as designated in Chapter 8 of the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. A commercial zoning designation, of any size, violates the intent of this Agreement. Staff and P&Z found that the revised preliminary plat meets the Rural Design Standards set forth in the Fringe Area Agreement, and therefore, in the event that the Board of Supervisors does rezone the property as requested, would recommend Council approve the preliminary plat. Attachments: 1. Revised Preliminary Plat, Received January 27, 2020 , `IA `v / /I 7 I I AI�vv vvvv,\` v VAA)AA\\\`VI)I�I IIIIl1- IIIIIIIII lI l /' /, J I I, //,//,/„ / TMJ^ / - A vv, v vv �v I `- V"� ��' / / \\ \ - , I I \ 1 \ \ I\ IIII / / / / / / / - \ \\ \\\ \ \ / - - _ \ / / v V/ ' '/// I// I) I I I I I I I I I A III I I I I l I l l l l l l l / I l / ( // // / / O _/ A vv vv � y v / �- `{1 / II \\\ '\I' /'/// /-, i ///// / // I/111 111111/111111111111111 1111111II I l / ( I//// ///-// / / I y', / I^`\\ \\�\\ \ .' - 1 I, y / // / / ) / / / / / / / / / / _ \ � \ \ \ \ _ / 1 \ �) / ///, ///// /l II /I\I ll1 II IIIIIIIII'IIIIIIIII I / // / / l/ \ 1 \ \\\\ i /`, 11\ \, , / / - /i, /// / ) l II III II II I I I 1 / I I /� /i////f // /) \// \\ \\\ - \\\\\\ J�'I- )/, � I i)\ /-- - - / / / / /1/11111 _ / /i/ / , / \ \ \\\ \\- 1 y \r\ 1 J - / ////// % / , , ,// / // IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II11 I / I ( t I ///// / '/ / / // ' / \O \\ \ \\\\\\ i 1 �/ \ J J / /' / / / / - '- --/ � "// / /// Ill I 11111111 VII I I ) I I /// / // / yF ) \ \\ \\ /// / 11 r I \ / � // /-/�/ ji STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Item: SUB19-16 Date: 01/16/2020 CZ19-05 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Adam Kos CJ Moyna & Sons 24412 Highway 13 Elkader, IA 52043 563-245-1442 AKos@cjmoyna.com Property Owner: Ray Frank, Edmund & Martha Freund, Judith Redeker, & CJ Moyna 24412 Highway 13 Elkader, IA 52043 563-245-1442 AKos@cjmoyna.com Requested Action: Approval of a County rezoning and preliminary plat. Purpose: Development of a commercial subdivision. Location: West of Oak Crest Hill Rd SE, east of Highway 218 SE, and south of F50 SE. Location Map: Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K 65.15 Acres Undeveloped, R — County Residential and A — County Agricultural North: Woodlands — County Residential (R) South: Mobile home park — County Highway Commercial (CH) East: Open space and quarry areas — County Agricultural (A) West: Route 218, open space, woodlands — County Agricultural (A) NA NA NA December 12, 2019 January 27, 2020 In June, 2019, the applicant submitted a comprehensive plan amendment application to Johnson County to amend the future land use map from Agricultural to Commercial for land located south of Riverside Drive and west of Oak Hill Crest Road. At the time of the application, City staff provided comment to the County Planning and Zoning Commission expressing staff's concerns related to the request. See Attachment 3. After receiving the memo from City staff outlining concerns related to the proposed FLUM amendment, the Board of Supervisors requested a meeting with the City. On September 23rd, 2019, the applicant, MMS staff, City and County Planning staff, the City Manager, Mayor Throgmorton, Council Member Thomas and Board of Supervisors Rettig and Sullivan, held a meeting to discuss the City's objection to the County's future land use map amendment from an Agricultural land use designation to a Commercial land use designation. Although the City objected, land use policy decisions in the unincorporated area are the County's and the Board of Supervisors adopted an amendment to the future land use map changing the land use designation from Agricultural to Commercial for approximately 60 acres. Subsequent to the adoption of the FLUM amendment, the applicant submitted a rezoning and preliminary plat application. Rezoning: The applicant, CJ Moyna & Sons, has requested rezoning of the parcels identified in Table 1.0 below. The subject properties are located south of Route 218 and Riverside Drive, in unincorporated Johnson County, Fringe Area C — outside of the City's Growth Area. The City Council will provide a recommendation to the Johnson County Board of Supervisors on the rezoning. 3 Table 1.0 Parcel No. Acreag Current Zoning Proposed Zoning 1 32.87 County Agricultural County Commercial (A►) (C) 2 0.09 County Residential County Commercial (R) (C) 3 32.19 County Residential County Highway (R) Commercial (CH) Preliminary Plat: The requested platting would create 11 lots for commercial development, with five outlots. Because the subject property is in the City/County Fringe Area, the subdivision must be approved by the City and by Johnson County. The subdivision must attain approval by the Iowa City Council before action can be taken by the Johnson County Board of Supervisors. With the property located in Fringe Area C — outside of the City's Growth Area, the proposed subdivision must conform to the City's Rural Design Standards. The City's Growth Area terminates north of Riverside Drive. ANALYSIS (Rezoning): Current Zoning: The subject area is currently zoned County Residential (R) in the area north of the proposed Izaak Walton Road SE extension (shown on the plat as Outlot A). This zoning designation allows for single-family dwellings on at least 1 -acre sized lots. The remaining balance of the property is zoned County Agricultural (A). Per the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance, "The Agricultural District is intended to preserve agricultural resources and protect agricultural land from encroachment of urban land uses. As a matter of policy, it is hereby determined that the highest and best use of these lands is agriculture and that the rural character of these areas be preserved." Proposed Zoning: A 32.19 -acre area north of the Izaak Walton Road SE extension (shown on the plat as Outlot A), is proposed to rezone to County Highway Commercial (CH). Per the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance, "The CH District is intended to establish and preserve higher impact commercial areas consisting of shopping centers and commercial strips where customers reach individual business establishments primarily by automobile. The uses permitted are generally high intensity in nature due to the large size of the principal building, high number of employees, and high traffic generators." The remaining balance of the subject property is proposed to rezone to County Commercial (C). Per the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance, "The C District is intended to establish and preserve a business district convenient and attractive for a wide range of retail uses and businesses, government and professional offices, and places of amusement in a setting conducive to and safe for pedestrian traffic. The uses permitted are generally low intensity in nature due to the small size of the principal building, low number of employees, and low traffic generators." Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The Fringe Area Agreement, which a component of C! the City's comprehensive plan, states the following: "In the portions of Area C that are not within Iowa City's growth area and which are zoned for non-farm development, development may occur in conformance with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance and City Rural Design Standards. Until otherwise changed by amending this agreement, this area shall be restricted to those uses consistent with a Rural/Agricultural area as indicated in the Johnson County Land Use Plan, and as designated for a Rural/Agricultural area in Chapter R-1.6 Class A District of the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance as amended. " A rezoning to County Commercial and County Highway Commercial designations opens a wide variety of land uses such as shopping centers, warehousing, storage, restaurants, theaters, taverns, and a variety of retail and service oriented uses. The development of more intense commercial uses conflicts with the intent of the Fringe Area Agreement's direction to maintain Rural/Agricultural land uses in this area. Based on the utilities and infrastructure needed to service most commercial land uses, City staff recommends that future commercial land use be located within the City's corporate limits. ANALYSIS (Preliminary Plat): Subdivision Design: The proposed subdivision creates eleven (11) parcels for commercial development, with five (5) outlots. Izaak Walton Road SE, located to the east of the subject property, will extend west into the proposed subdivision. A 31.39 -acre outlot (Outlot A) will be located north of the Izaak Walton Road extension. The plat shows Izaak Walton Road SE ending in a cul-de-sac, with a temporary turnaround easement in the southwest corner of Outlot A. The subdivision would create two additional streets, Oakside Road SE, which would stem off Izaak Walton Road SE in a north -south direction. Greenview Road SE would be a new east -west road between Oakside Road SE and Oak Hill Crest Road. The eleven (11) planned lots for development would range between 1 and 3.66 acres in size. Outlot B, located in the subdivision's far southeast corner, would feature a 2.77 -acre lot dedicated to storm water detention. Outlots C and E, respectively feature 4.18 and 3.37 acres of open space. Outlot D contains 0.23 acres of infrastructure for future right-of-way and potential future extension of Oakside Road SE to the south. Overall, City staff found that the subdivision design conformed with the City's Rural Design Standards. Traffic Implications: The proposed 26' wide internal streets would meet the minimum 22' wide requirement from the City's Rural Design Standards. Staff also noted that an overhead light might be appropriate at the intersection of Oak Crest Hill Road and Izaak Walton Road SE., due to the higher traffic speeds on Oak Crest Hill Road. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subdivision will be required to conform with County regulations pertaining to sensitive areas development. Open space outlots on the southern end of the proposed subdivision will be converted to preservation outlots, per the County's direction to preserve the stream corridor along the property's southern end. In addition, the subdivision proposed disturbing 2.67 acres of timber in Outlot A. Johnson County will require protection of off-site woodlands at a ratio of 8:1, equaling 21.36 acres of timber off-site to be put under perpetual protection. Storm Water Management: Stormwater management will be provided by installation of a 2.77 -acre stormwater detention basin. Three separate 15' wide storm sewer utility easements will service the basin, with two points of discharge on the north side of the basin, and one point of discharge in the basin's southeast corner. 5 Sanitary Sewer and Water Service: Water service to the subdivision will be provided by a public well system, with distribution lines running along the north sides of Izaak Walton Road SE and Greenview Road SE and along the east side of Oakside Road SE, within the public right-of-way. Although it is labeled as a public well, this well will not be maintained by the City of Iowa City. Each lot will utilize individual septic systems, which will be required to conform to the Johnson County Board of Health Rules and Regulations Governing On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems. NEXT STEPS: The Planning and Zoning Commission will make a recommendation on the rezoning and preliminary plat to the City Council. The Council, will then provide a recommendation on the rezoning to the Johnson County Board of Supervisors. The City must approve the preliminary plat for the Johnson County Board of Supervisors to take action on the plat. The Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission will have the rezoning and preliminary plat item for consideration on its February agenda. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Rezoning): Based on the adopted policy in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement, staff continues to recommend denial of the CZ19-05, an application to rezone approximately 32,19 acres to County Highway Commercial and approximately 32.96 acres to County Commercial. As was stated earlier, a rezoning to County Commercial and County Highway Commercial designations opens a wide variety of land uses for this area that are not in compliance with the Fringe Area Agreement. The Fringe Area Agreement provides for the creation of a conflict resolution committee in situations where the City and County disagree on land use actions. Staff does not believe that a future conflict resolution committee meeting with Johnson County on this rezoning is necessary, since the City's concerns over the future land use of the subject property have not changed since the meeting with the County on September 23, 2019. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Preliminary Plat): Staff is recommending approval of SUB19-16, an application for a preliminary plat of the 218 Commercial Park subdivision, as the plat does not present any conflicts with the City's Rural Design Standards. This recommendation is subject to the County's approval of the proposed rezoning, which the City does not support. If the County Board of Supervisors does not approve the proposed rezoning, staff would recommend denial of the plat. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Memo to Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission, August 9, 2019 4. Preliminary Plat Approved by: : I ). sl+-�� Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services B n 2T o TD R�� ns� DE DRYE u N V) (0 N N10-11 45-E rn 533.29• NiOZ t\R� � Q rn -�rnzrn ll\ A�,°rn N �F rn rns1rn R� R' FTI N I OmC z � yp-3alse Lnld s �r � aSFl Z 3AWCf) v� ��;m `° m LTJ o Ml z to M N Lek �oMl 2 L4 Ks 1 11 1.z. �. oo JJ _ L4C�o N° G) -. � oo (OJ 0000N(I+NOO(Jl W0OOOJ0W000cyn 0 • D A O M, D A m o m m�° w m CD v om CD Zno�mCzn(�o 18'HI«7w'AY Cn z� co m � 27 n N I'T'I o 0M 335.51' v p) (53 o ° o° o rt z -40 o r Iva A z 71 ,e, r UN N 3� o �r�o �-O Z� Z A6 t Z 2i8Nii r -pg R14f R51 N 'o. V, mtnT.9C0�rPPr N WOrn1z S a or>R > / rno��a 7rn T.(111) -21r r �D �.Z7 N m C �D r Z,MD38RFZZ< -- o+ <_ N 1y cA r N ° n 1p y8r / (nD j n O K N < .Zl �FrwDFFD *r>r� -� — \ mp ODa0rZ r r Orpp U -0 0 5'CD m ) CLCOCD O O 0 �-n - x >00;KDD mr n�� a OL Z nm °' m ooh o� 2= FSOSF Z _ _ o a° z� 3N m yo n^' �? �1m mmCn° m3 o m ��3-' D oo a 3-° mm� 9 �3c3� v 5' m� m0 m D �O m °-mac N70 5m V r 3 0 CC o O 0 °' �_ Cn 0 = O N V o o �_ U) O O wn N2 V ° o o m CD v 3-, m CD ZZ G) 0 X c0 _ m 3 n N C O '3" O r W m -O O O CP ° O N m Z D M Cn C D O CD m `_G O N O D Cn O A O 0 Cn 3 N 7 3 N Z m LOCATION �.o � ao m m wn° a n my azv0CD -n= Om o cNn a 3 mD OCn ° n m o m mON,m (nQm wm cDm (n° o ` 3 °gym *D w� �IOoO ¢ (nm v N< a3 Cad Cn��D, �Dp (n o °m rn� m �� m m 3o N) CD CD �A nD ° c rn �o m mCn (nom m A ° ° Nm n ° wp c p r o o° 0 - NO) w co (05.- MCO OBD A m a__ ° co OfJ C c K)0A ��Cnm � ° �° O o (, m o r-n FO mff1 5 W CD n m ----o C O r °o CGS �O-1 D (D CD 0m 7< oC' (nD .Z�1 CD O (flO O Q.c.�' o W O m C7 0_ m o � C wc pC TI A I N I I I I I I I I I Wto N NN N U�Co AoYogoio xx-p,x" r 0 -0 t' E 0 v m N v m O Cn co0 0�,`< D mm N o n m ° N r.Cn-. X N x � u (a v ° CO a rn m n [D.� m CO rrt MMm mA m p1 O O (A E mCi n 7 7 0 � m N -n 3m N m .L7r°� ZC N o mD -FN (Q LOON f/i (7 Z '< Cn SU U pQ C0 (D 3 m A O° 0 3 B n 2T o TD R�� ns� DE DRYE u N V) (0 N N10-11 45-E rn 533.29• NiOZ t\R� � Q rn -�rnzrn ll\ A�,°rn N �F rn rns1rn R� R' FTI N I OmC z v o-iAm =W3 00 00 Z 3AWCf) v� ��;m `° m LTJ o Ml z to M N SSS S �oMl 2 L4 Ks 1 11 1.z. �. oo G) _ L4C�o N° G) U) o D o � oo 0 o r (n O� D A O M, D A m o m m�° w m CD v om CD Zno�mCzn(�o Z- C)m� Cn z� - N10'Og• 21„E m � (� m n N I'T'I o 0M 335.51' v p) (53 o ° o° o rt z -40 o r Iva A z 71 ,e, r UN N 3� o �r�o �-O Z� Z A6 mA =�3 a m o G)m oaCOCD ri �Cn �rn-'- Aw W. Fp 'o. 2S F C0 ZC �� / WOrn1z S a 38?2 > / rno��a 7rn Q>10 rM�. �D �.Z7 N SCD Cnm --j ID m !n CD N 0 3- <O O 0 C �D rT Oo Dm 0 CD°�mo 3° m ° C � F rn °m�rnmm�o�� Do -_' m JOwo A° N v m mo m m n CD O CD d m CD N X, < O - D (nD j n O K N < .Zl o�]nN Z .Z1 E — \ mp ODa0rZ y 7 Chi D0 Om U -0 0 5'CD m ) CLCOCD O O 0 �-n - x z OD r*i 0 w 1n OD Co Is C=) D w N z� goC In - QL�, F No ^� �Norn I 0- W "� m� G) 0 r U rn�1 DW Qc)� �rnD M D Z z -< nO Ffl M 1 rn p G) F W \rn O V M ° O N ° z? 00 O y Co �° _ 0� c) Q y IrTl Z OmC z v o-iAm =W3 00 00 Z 3AWCf) v� ��;m `° m c0nn�r� mm p II II II Ln M x G M N SSS S O� OCA o -n:.4 "' 1 11 1.z. �. oo G) (n0 rm w mF33N w0 G) O (.,U CSC 00 V O ? W O(r oo to y W W C7 c m6,o m (n O� D A O NNS D A m o m m�° w m CD v om CD Zno�mCzn(�o Z- C)m� ��t"uJnV a m 3 m aZ,' CD m � (� m 7 L 0M (� m v p) (53 o ° o° o rt z -40 ODO r ^ U J A z 71 ,e, r UN N 3� o �r�o �-O Z� Z r mA =�3 a m o G)m oaCOCD ri �Cn �rn-'- Aw W. T 'o. ° 0 ° c Zin m C0 ZC Z O 1�� o m rnm o X,5 m Da n � a Z O o o m �. �� m N p lZ3Cp GJO rt 'a �p' w G) .m N(D O �D �.Z7 N No ^� �Norn I 0- W "� m� G) 0 r U rn�1 DW Qc)� �rnD M D Z z -< nO Ffl M 1 rn p G) F W \rn O V M ° O N ° z? 00 O y Co �° _ 0� c) Q y IrTl Z ti3eOR, \ m U ZO z dark 5V As p D`` O �zrn z z �. z d A O 3.Zti.6ti•tls �� rn �� ° O - -� �rnaaN - 70 cu N� rnF' �� 3w�o,££z�s >N �sW rZ A Orn �rn D�� ZZ D 1 1 O 710 Z O �7 NSFn F rn� 70 -4 Ffl FTI LIE �d00 ag �� a a rn mND �� a�a O o - �o ora o 00 � � allD� ao z m Q� �� o�"m'0 o IN �0oo c r Trn�rn� rrcn la0 D/�z C rn �- / D/ z i o� Wv�au� m ��N _ 69ti�Z�5 i" w ( y OD Div_-90°ocDi) D N 399.9`” J i' OUB SUDS 2R DUAO�N r 0 >rzm�� rn -0 (n N �v rn R -ow aaplOH }30a}UO3 Dn j Z 0 rn my% -0z z r rnrn o� m�mF-D m ��rn (n r- / (no Z1msC�mZ7zzD6(n(nC� mDD 0 zz 88,W2 mD 0 m ME85K4ON ( W 02 TIO 0 (on n a CD c m n o coo n w n° (1 Z m o W o �1 m ° m o m 3 o m m o O C D m cf)rn 3 m CD Cb(D aN0 °�3 (ooCD a o� CD aalvo nio 3 20 Cp O Nw�o'3 n0 (7 aCD o C9 ID W0 (D (nQo 3 0X0 O Cnm'<� N n rnrn zcn° m D� o w� m A �_ N N -4 CD m rnm ° m 0�0 o ar�Aoo IN CO) -L,8 R. Dmf m ° � m ��. D� m o v �I��Zo n rncOi w�. 0m� rt� m n a, � rp0 5 5._ o ° r0 Qpm -, m c cnA Er W m o o3m�� oN�D co JAZ p N _ m o �Z p �� o J v� n mo 0 p O Cn 3N o 000 c°L0 ° m C90 �° A0Om z �� o �o A� z ° i� 0 ao aDa 0 Sam Tlp Z m O -O m C) jD w 3 to No ° m Z� x 0 o v m o ° c ° 3 O T7 �7 C N T o o a° o co c p 2 m v m 0= m Q Z 3 co a .�. to m n m n m O Z= - p3 oC"o 0 ° Cn °, ° to DTm N D X,m (n D N -'Cao w �o om �m Z �2 N Zm m� 3 n �3 v �o3° m o z O ID Co zm O E o m O 0 m= O v -i CD m m m �" O CaO m p_ O O `� Cn z �. Z` Cn z � N pQ N Vi � Q 0 a- O z m 0 o � 05'M z n CnCrm ° 3° o Am .-[1 OmC z v o-iAm =W3 00 00 Z 3AWCf) v� ��;m `° m ZZ z \ o G) T o -n:.4 "' SC Z= G) (n0 rm w mF33N w0 G) O w 0 < OAm D A to y W W C7 c m6,o m (n O� D A O C� D A m o m m�° w m CD v om CD Zno�mCzn(�o Z- C)m� C- m a m 3 m aZ,' CD Z m n� (� m -01,0 o 0 0 o m 3 on ' m c Dao o 0M (� m v p) (53 o ° o° o rt z -40 ODO r 0m Zo a r UN N 3� o �r�o �-O Z� Z r mA =�3 a m o G)m oaCOCD ri �Cn �rn-'- Aw W. CCnC Z4D Z O ° 0 ° c Zin m C0 ZC Z O 1�� o m rnm o X,5 m Da n � =0 Z O o o m �. �� m N p lZ3Cp GJO rt 'a �p' w G) .m N(D O �D �.Z7 N SCD Cnm --j ID m !n CD N 0 3- <O O 0 C �D I\ Dm 0 CD°�mo 3° m ° 0 m ti3eOR, \ m U ZO z dark 5V As p D`` O �zrn z z �. z d A O 3.Zti.6ti•tls �� rn �� ° O - -� �rnaaN - 70 cu N� rnF' �� 3w�o,££z�s >N �sW rZ A Orn �rn D�� ZZ D 1 1 O 710 Z O �7 NSFn F rn� 70 -4 Ffl FTI LIE �d00 ag �� a a rn mND �� a�a O o - �o ora o 00 � � allD� ao z m Q� �� o�"m'0 o IN �0oo c r Trn�rn� rrcn la0 D/�z C rn �- / D/ z i o� Wv�au� m ��N _ 69ti�Z�5 i" w ( y OD Div_-90°ocDi) D N 399.9`” J i' OUB SUDS 2R DUAO�N r 0 >rzm�� rn -0 (n N �v rn R -ow aaplOH }30a}UO3 Dn j Z 0 rn my% -0z z r rnrn o� m�mF-D m ��rn (n r- / (no Z1msC�mZ7zzD6(n(nC� mDD 0 zz 88,W2 mD 0 m ME85K4ON ( W 02 TIO 0 (on n a CD c m n o coo n w n° (1 Z m o W o �1 m ° m o m 3 o m m o O C D m cf)rn 3 m CD Cb(D aN0 °�3 (ooCD a o� CD aalvo nio 3 20 Cp O Nw�o'3 n0 (7 aCD o C9 ID W0 (D (nQo 3 0X0 O Cnm'<� N n rnrn zcn° m D� o w� m A �_ N N -4 CD m rnm ° m 0�0 o ar�Aoo IN CO) -L,8 R. Dmf m ° � m ��. D� m o v �I��Zo n rncOi w�. 0m� rt� m n a, � rp0 5 5._ o ° r0 Qpm -, m c cnA Er W m o o3m�� oN�D co JAZ p N _ m o �Z p �� o J v� n mo 0 p O Cn 3N o 000 c°L0 ° m C90 �° A0Om z �� o �o A� z ° i� 0 ao aDa 0 Sam Tlp Z m O -O m C) jD w 3 to No ° m Z� x 0 o v m o ° c ° 3 O T7 �7 C N T o o a° o co c p 2 m v m 0= m Q Z 3 co a .�. to m n m n m O Z= - p3 oC"o 0 ° Cn °, ° to DTm N D X,m (n D N -'Cao w �o om �m Z �2 N Zm m� 3 n �3 v �o3° m o z O ID Co zm O E o m O 0 m= O v -i CD m m m �" O CaO m p_ O O `� Cn z �. Z` Cn z � N pQ N Vi � Q 0 a- O z m 0 o � 05'M z n CnCrm ° 3° o Am .-[1 OmC z v o-iAm =W3 00 00 Z 3AWCf) v� ��;m `° m ZZ z -n�cc c m 9 m MO m m m 7 5 OR,Cn„N (n3 2 ZZ2c G) T o -n:.4 "' SC Z= G) (n0 rm w mF33N w0 G) m� N n �' ° r n O r W C7 O wm fl m m X,9 E- o w 0 < OAm D A to y W W C7 c m6,o m (n O� D A [ll (A r m N (D V (7 wz w� (noN Amo = D A m o m m�° w m CD v om CD Zno�mCzn(�o Z- C)m� C- m a m 3 m aZ,' CD Z m n� (� m -01,0 o 0 0 o m 3 on ' m c Dao o 0M (� m v p) (53 o ° o° o rt z -40 ODO r 0m Zo p r UN N 3� o �r�o �-O Z� Z r mA =�3 a m o G)m oaCOCD ri �Cn �rn-'- Aw W. CCnC Z4D Z O ° 0 ° c Zin m C0 ZC Z O 1�� o m rnm o X,5 m Da n � =0 Z O o o m �. �� m N p lZ3Cp GJO rt 'a �p' w G) .m N(D O �D �.Z7 N SCD Cnm --j ID m !n CD N 0 3- <O O 0 C �D °o°m° m3�D mo CDn c c Dm 0 CD°�mo 3° m ° 0 m °m�rnmm�o�� Do -_' m JA o m A° N v m mo m m n CD O CD d m CD N X, < O - R- .. • _�OOU E (nD j n O K N < .Zl C v r m' CD Cfl O °- m to O Co W m3mDLL.' <' Z .Z1 E omo��°mww o��°' 2.<m N Nry m 0 O Dm mp= y 7 m�mo'm � m 00 o D0 Om �a -0 0 5'CD m ) CLCOCD O O 0 �-n - x mO CSN v mo �.N n�� a OL Z nm °' m ooh o� 2= CL (D ZoCDm C°D 0- w rm o m m Z_33 X20 N A o a° z� 3N m yo n^' �? �1m mmCn° m3 o m ��3-' D oo a 3-° mm� �3c3� v 5' m� m0 W 3D° o (D rlC:,. nv �� X,m ° D �O m °-mac N70 5m V r 3 0 CC o O 0 °' �_ Cn 0 = O N V o o �_ U) O O wn N2 V ° o o m CD v 3-, m CD ZZ G) 0 X c0 _ m 3 n N C O '3" O r W m -O O O CP ° O N m Z D M Cn C D O CD m `_G O N O D Cn O A O 0 Cn 3 N 7 3 N Z m LOCATION �.o � ao m m wn° a n my azv0CD -n= Om o cNn a 3 mD OCn ° n m o m mON,m (nQm wm cDm (n° o ` 3 °gym *D w� �IOoO ¢ (nm v N< a3 Cad Cn��D, �Dp (n o °m rn� m �� m m 3o N) CD CD �A nD ° c rn �o m mCn (nom m A ° ° Nm n ° wp c p r o o° 0 - NO) w co (05.- MCO OBD A m a__ ° co OfJ C c K)0A ��Cnm � ° �° O o (, m o r-n � lJ mff1 5 W CD n m ----o C O r °o CGS �O-1 D (D CD 0m 7< oC' (nD .Z�1 CD O (flO O Q.c.�' o W O m C7 0_ m o � C wc pC TI A ;U OJ (D N m m (L] f0 p CD o N m<< .Zl .Z1' W (f] N< m N c O' v C Cn N r° O Q SO C 0 v m N v m O Cn co0 0�,`< D mm o n m ° N r.Cn-. X (a v ° CO a rn m n [D.� m CO rrt MMm mA m p1 O O (A E mCi n 7 7 0 O ° CL CSD o -n 3m N m .L7r°� ZC N o mD -FN (Q LOON f/i (7 Z '< Cn SU U pQ C0 (D 3 m A O° 0 3 Cn CO—D i 61 n O CZ °' m o m T z c C.n..CD �rA� ao Nv (n [ll O m 62cOi 0p Qpm �_ Z(OO ° W �3O OC -3m o m n�m N`N mm 21 20 mCD -4 CC 0 (n0� CO '... O CD o OF3 OZ m O1 0 (7� p No ' V vi 0 N N C73 mD x .CD.. -CD O CD D O .Z1�"N N �ANOC7� Zp O� N Z 3 W 0m CD �C,QO D� Z.Z1 m v 'o o X,� moao N TS �� °�CaDn2�. m ° No �r m o 0� mzi m n 3 3 o ° 00 m r V- o o CCD rt - m? ° D p ID 3A� CD 3° 7 N m ID mN =CD O N-4 W � -0 m 0( :0N rZ 7 7 fll0� n aim ?� n C rZ1m m° com QN C� < 'aNpr� Co CD m m.(1 CD m I�TIO O N SU 3 m CD N O °O N OQ COQ < 2 m �" z J COD O O 0. 0) N Z 3 co 0) d '�— Cn° m mw W o coonac o -pi Q O N O] W N N (fl Z m 0 Zfn 2> �3� O 7 7 7 = Do 5cp NO-° a-5 O O CCD' C A C S O m 7 02 D m O Co3N CORD 0 -CD CD ffl0 CN)_7O O-3 M (COD COD 5 - N co Q° O"_Q V �'N <N N 3 z0 ... W m 3U7 37 Ocn VO AZO 3 (0 in3 O� O� .N-. .G OZm Cn O.-0 D rpmm ° E <N MCOD ° !TI r m O (n ZD O A �O� N w (n O °-n N ID My ��7-(°p 3N a o m m m° (n =_ m m m r� �D mm o w w 0 �� o_.m = o m ° n. m� n wQ. CD OCDi� CD !Z N O N O COO N = A (fl N Q Cwj 3 3 N to O O C7 nj '2 Z CD C Cn �.co,nO �SO- o -n p X U7fflCn j 00 X n N W O2T N OHO j Q O m C -)O N O 'a ajN = 7 (7 m cO as CD =r n m W QC, D O (CD/�1 O w O Oo p c z. -[D1 b RWl< : 3 .� G) Z� G)2 z�(Ni,_< Z�I� m c SmC7No Na� < v m m ° �Ic wm cao 0 CCD- O m 15N O C '�O� ZO 61 Cn Zm °gip 0) z m Z� CCD 7 rN 'O-' 3�c p �� m°-mU)' M00CD01=1210 0 G) :03 m�5oC°1i�a��0`?( 3 m OO �- W '� n ° (A W ° (n (°n � 3 m � Cn � M 3 m O a 00 � N W C°p n CD v- wCnm n m TI vo O 0w0 o m m A� s W° a m rn� ��(n (Q m N •.• Cfl N 5 N 3 0 (n2 �m D am0 CD �(a Cn 0 O E m m mnm AO v j 0 O O O CD O N— N Z D� 2 0 m /-4pD (nz z� = cn0� O=mq�m0 �>=p=z �M -n M I Z0(nNcn� �m �O ��D Z OCD �mcg :z FTIC/) m f� D U) n _ C 0 2 Z ��0x m> 0 O �_zm n 0 N I I o •DSD 00 c D '�a 'a m O ;>0a ;a z D�m Z-1iIJm�= N�Do � m o��- m=O0�ccn rn m mz D n "m0m=�pz i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i (n ZJ Z D ;J > A 0 K;0M r-r-0M0MC) m AAAA0 M cMML<>OOmF)OX,c zX, X,000 0 cn _ X>OW n��Z ZOO 0 OZZZ N n n = O Z mcg-d2ccm�O- -600M M 00 D c- 0 O m; -n m C U) --I M X,OcmzzX, m;x ° _� �mmm r Z TI D p G) -Ml �oom,-cmn-cmnZ nU) -<-<NNN Z OZ N 0 Cn = _ z K00NCX,Zm�z� a�0OZZZ D Z D Z= m m 0 m -- zr VSD 0 f -.00 ,n D _ �ZZmN>A �� = z zPPP 0 O = D m p cn cn o c00--1 ,?moo �vX,i �000 - 1 y D cn 0 "—� D^ m 0 2 0 mNCnZ=A;0 Kzzr-a r NOp C�!C� mvmmm N OZ C m X, m zD �.f � -ppp o w Cn m _ D 0= (n `n�-< r--< �X,X,� D zMM0 W Z T1 TM TI TI 1m� O c�M NM c:Z ton OONZ n N N cn D -00 o V) O 1n 0 W O ZZ O T /1 (nM r O0N 0 ncn/Nvl�Om r= D O D D Zo o a0o Z mmz0C� mo DC��ZD� �_ z m0D0omp oW�Ty--q 5OZm DD� O Z r � 0'u fn p,, n v ��m wcOi 3 -nID 0 N con OT m m3' CL 0 a� �o-rnZm cmnZ r Z T� O= a p = C i Ri N N - N m (PZrvr n O M a o � m rn p o� �A M. O O Z m W�� oo w��o 03 m D my �^ A a , m �� o m 0 =r m om m= m Ivo ono 333 ° o m a o I(D 3 c m ?tA -n v� m C� m ?t m a vm 3�3m J o Om � Er o Cu X, m o m rn w D SD CD a a o 3 ri m m CCD) o a n LI). = °-D <m a = o n= m li m co m a (DA a m a of r nNr.x,, R- .. • _�OOU E 0 E a E z a y 7 p F �a - x e a � LOCATION MAP - NOT TO SCALE /-4pD (nz z� = cn0� O=mq�m0 �>=p=z �M -n M I Z0(nNcn� �m �O ��D Z OCD �mcg :z FTIC/) m f� D U) n _ C 0 2 Z ��0x m> 0 O �_zm n 0 N I I o •DSD 00 c D '�a 'a m O ;>0a ;a z D�m Z-1iIJm�= N�Do � m o��- m=O0�ccn rn m mz D n "m0m=�pz i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i (n ZJ Z D ;J > A 0 K;0M r-r-0M0MC) m AAAA0 M cMML<>OOmF)OX,c zX, X,000 0 cn _ X>OW n��Z ZOO 0 OZZZ N n n = O Z mcg-d2ccm�O- -600M M 00 D c- 0 O m; -n m C U) --I M X,OcmzzX, m;x ° _� �mmm r Z TI D p G) -Ml �oom,-cmn-cmnZ nU) -<-<NNN Z OZ N 0 Cn = _ z K00NCX,Zm�z� a�0OZZZ D Z D Z= m m 0 m -- zr VSD 0 f -.00 ,n D _ �ZZmN>A �� = z zPPP 0 O = D m p cn cn o c00--1 ,?moo �vX,i �000 - 1 y D cn 0 "—� D^ m 0 2 0 mNCnZ=A;0 Kzzr-a r NOp C�!C� mvmmm N OZ C m X, m zD �.f � -ppp o w Cn m _ D 0= (n `n�-< r--< �X,X,� D zMM0 W Z T1 TM TI TI 1m� O c�M NM c:Z ton OONZ n N N cn D -00 o V) O 1n 0 W O ZZ O T /1 (nM r O0N 0 ncn/Nvl�Om r= D O D D Zo o a0o Z mmz0C� mo DC��ZD� �_ z m0D0omp oW�Ty--q 5OZm DD� O Z r � 0'u fn p,, n v ��m wcOi 3 -nID 0 N con OT m m3' CL 0 a� �o-rnZm cmnZ r Z T� O= CC jC- N=N n .ln.. ,CD r i0 ID (D 00 0 7 p = C j 0 r �0 Z _ N N - N m (PZrvr n O M a o � m rn p o� �A M. O O Z m W�� oo w��o 03 m D my o m c m 30 m �� o m 0 =r m om m= m Ivo ono 333 ° o m a o I(D 3 c m ?tA -n v� m C� m ?t m a vm 3�3m J o Om � Er o Cu X, m o m rn w D SD CD a a o 3 ri m m CCD) o a n LI). = °-D <m a = o n= m li m co m a (DA fl a fl OL OOC)OOOOD Iv fl O Q2p2�mAmDcc =O mm M N 00 _ 3 U) �= m0= _ E===m; N o (� 0 Q Q m*mzmzM. Z zDODOxDD Cnp � r- Cfl D° 6 O D� �=��O��ooz O (° O D _- 2 m m� O p Z O A�pypm(np =m0 Z r DOD mD .0 N 0 fl1 N Z cn z nzx�x40xpm>m z :U o 3 Dc�o z n r Dr -- T N „ r �AX0�IJz;;�pz Z n nJ D-0 z C KSMDZ>wMo QOD,X m A O (n z r O m U) cX,2 x fn = w� D r,, rn N D (Z X-DmmDmDm ��D = < c (DOG) —0 :C7 C z o ° m� Z DG) --1 -0 a nDm — m 'H W C7 = D � O Z A D W z�Z0 0;a 000,0 : �Dm � m z z N00 - 0 Om r -< Z m 0 0 Z cmn D � z --I > � r� = oNo N) � :;0 Du ;;a O � r- m m -n --i z � IN 0 C/) C/) Cly C/) C/� CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY Or LITERATURE Date: August 9, 2019 To: Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission From: Neighborhood and Development Services Department Re: 2019 Fringe Area Future Land Use Map Amendments Introduction and Summary Neighborhood and Development Services staff appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comment on the County Future Land Use Map amendment applications within and near the Fringe Area. Although there is no formal review requirement stipulated in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement, staff appreciates the ongoing coordination with County planning staff on issues in the Fringe Area. This memo outlines the advisory positions of City staff on three County Future Land Use Map amendment applications. The City is currently analyzing long-range planning needs within the Fringe Area, and will need to incorporate any major County land use map amendments into its ongoing analysis. Approach to Analysis In staff's review of the proposed Future Land Use Map amendments, NDS staff: a) Compared the existing land use category to the proposed, including the general intended land uses and the associated density/intensity of development allowed. b) Reviewed the policies in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement. c) Identified applicable goals and policies in the City's comprehensive plan. For amendments proposing more intense land uses (e.g. commercial) that are more appropriate with access to City services and infrastructure, staff reviewed the annexation potential. Future Land Use Map Amendment FLUM-19-27757 of Charlie Ockenfels Application Background The proposed request by Charlie Ockenfels is to change 6.85 acres on the County's Future Land Use Map from Agricultural to Residential on parcel number 1503253001 (this parcel does not currently have an address). The subject property is located at the southern end of the Oak Crest Hill region, off Indian Lookout Road. The majority of the properties surrounding the subject property are also shown as Agricultural on the County Future Land Use Map, with the exception of the land to the east, which is designated Preservation. Adjacent properties located to the west and north of the subject property feature larger lot residential homes, and have a mixture of zoning between County R -Residential and County A- Agricultural. Figure 1 is a zoning map that shows the location of the proposed amendment in blue. August 9, 2019 Page 2 rigure 1. Location of rroposea Amenamen T ❑lir . I_ ! �- i ri til , i - i The end of the application packet contains seven copies of a plat outlining the subject parcel, with signatures from adjoining neighbors indicating support of the map amendment to County- Residential (as well as subsequent rezoning and subdivision of the parcel). The section of the application essay titled "Land Use and Map, Proposed South Land Use — Oak Crest Hill Region", contains some language about how preexisting, lower density residential uses should be preserved, and how potentially similar residential uses could be built in the area east of Oak Crest Hill Road. This section of the application essay seems to be describing the area including the subject property. Analysis Table 1 compares the existing Future Land Use Map category to the proposed amendment. Table 1. Comparison of Existina and Proposed Land Use Cateaory *Assumes a rezoning to standard County R zoning, with the ability to develop the site to its full build- out potential (not factoring in constraints from sensitive areas). Fringe Area Policy The subject parcel is located in Area "C" of the City's Fringe Area, outside of the growth area. This Fringe Area designation calls for rural/agricultural uses, or uses consistent with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. Road infrastructure must meet the City's rural design standards. Existing FLUM Category Proposed FLUM Category Agricultural Residential Typical Land Uses Agriculture (Crop Production & Single-family detached Animal Husbandry); Limited dwellings (1 unit per acre of Residential denser); Can include some non-residential development Residential Limited, case by case (no more Limited to locations that can Development than 2 acres per dwelling); support and accommodate should be associated with food designated Residential production or consistent with densities historic use Max Development Development intensity not 6 Dwelling Units* Potential specified in the Future Land Use Map Category. *Assumes a rezoning to standard County R zoning, with the ability to develop the site to its full build- out potential (not factoring in constraints from sensitive areas). Fringe Area Policy The subject parcel is located in Area "C" of the City's Fringe Area, outside of the growth area. This Fringe Area designation calls for rural/agricultural uses, or uses consistent with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. Road infrastructure must meet the City's rural design standards. August 9, 2019 Page 3 City's Comprehensive Plan The City's South Central District Plan does not cover the subject area. NDS's Advisory Position Several large -lot residential land uses can be found to the west of the subject property. Indian Lookout Rd. SE is a paved road that can support demand for residential development. Given these existing conditions, NDS staff does not have concerns with the proposed amendment. Going forward, City staff believes that the County should be mindful of the potential for increased residential density on both the subject parcel and in the immediate surrounding area, in the event that subsequent Future Land Use Map amendment requests are received or ownership of property changes. However, as it relates to the subject property, development beyond 2-3 additional dwelling units will prove challenging due to constraints with sensitive areas. Future Land Use Map Amendment FLUM-19-27759 of Claude Greiner Application Background The proposed request by Claude Greiner is to change the County Future Land Use Map from Agricultural to Residential to allow for future residential development on two parcels equaling 73 acres. Figure 2 shows the subject properties in blue, next to the yellow area identified as Residential on the County Future Land Use Map. Figure 2. Location of Proposed Map Amendment In June of 2019, the Iowa City City Council approved a preliminary plat for a Not subdivision located directly north of the subject properties. The approved subdivision contains a stubbed out street and stormwater detention infrastructure, intended to service both the subdivision to the north and planned development on the subject properties. Analysis There is a moderate degree of existing residential uses to the west along American Legion Road. Additionally, there is some estate housing to the north of American Legion Road. The existing residential land uses are identified on the County's Future Land Use Map as Residential. While the subject properties would be directly adjacent to the land designated Residential, there are still large August 9, 2019 Page 4 swaths of undeveloped land within this designated area. Table 2 compares the existing land use category with the proposed. Staff anticipates that with a potential rezoning to County- Residential, a full build -out of the properties could yield between 50 and 70 dwelling units. Table 2. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Land Use Category *Dwelling unit figure based on an assumption of rezoning to County R -Residential zoning, at the maximum build -out of 1 unit per acre. Max build -out does not take into consideration the area needed for the development of roadways and stormwater management. Fringe Area Policy The two subject parcels are located outside of the City's current Fringe Area, meaning that they are technically not subject to any of the regulations of the Fringe Area Agreement. These properties are; however, located within 2 miles of the City's jurisdictional boundary. The closest Fringe Area classification can be found to the north and west of the subject parcels, which is Fringe Area B — Outside of the Growth Area. This Fringe Area classification calls for rural/agricultural uses, and road infrastructure must meet the City's rural design standards. City Comprehensive Planning The City's Southeast District Plan does not cover the subject properties. However, about one -mile northwest of the County's designated Residential land use area (see Figure 2), the Southeast District Plan does call for future housing to match what is located on the west side of Taft Avenue (upon improvement of Taft Avenue to City standards, and projected subsequent residential development). The density projected for this area is a low to medium range density, with lot sizes between 5,000 — 8,000 square feet in size (roughly 1/10 to 1/5 of an acre). With continued demand for expansion of the City eastward, it is not unreasonable to assume similar development patterns could eventually abut the County's designated Residential land use area. NDS's Advisory Position NDS staff has concerns with the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment from Agricultural to Residential. The land use change, and subsequent rezoning and development of the subject properties, could add a generous amount of estate -sized housing to an area that the City has seen outward growth and demand for increased residential growth. There is abundant land (approximately 190 acres) within the County's designated Residential land use area for County Residential infill development. And finally, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council evaluation of the rezoning of the property to the north of the subject properties was met with some resistance, due to the area's proposed departure from the agricultural uses prescribed in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement. Existing FLUM Category Proposed FLUM Category Agricultural Residential Typical Land Uses Agriculture (Crop Production & Single-family detached Animal Husbandry); Limited dwellings (1 unit per acre or Residential denser); Can include some non-residential development Residential Limited, case by case (no more Limited to locations that can Development than 2 acres per dwelling); support and accommodate should be associated with food designated residential production or consistent with densities; historic use Max Development Development intensity not 73 Dwelling Units* Potential specified in the Future Land Use Map Category. *Dwelling unit figure based on an assumption of rezoning to County R -Residential zoning, at the maximum build -out of 1 unit per acre. Max build -out does not take into consideration the area needed for the development of roadways and stormwater management. Fringe Area Policy The two subject parcels are located outside of the City's current Fringe Area, meaning that they are technically not subject to any of the regulations of the Fringe Area Agreement. These properties are; however, located within 2 miles of the City's jurisdictional boundary. The closest Fringe Area classification can be found to the north and west of the subject parcels, which is Fringe Area B — Outside of the Growth Area. This Fringe Area classification calls for rural/agricultural uses, and road infrastructure must meet the City's rural design standards. City Comprehensive Planning The City's Southeast District Plan does not cover the subject properties. However, about one -mile northwest of the County's designated Residential land use area (see Figure 2), the Southeast District Plan does call for future housing to match what is located on the west side of Taft Avenue (upon improvement of Taft Avenue to City standards, and projected subsequent residential development). The density projected for this area is a low to medium range density, with lot sizes between 5,000 — 8,000 square feet in size (roughly 1/10 to 1/5 of an acre). With continued demand for expansion of the City eastward, it is not unreasonable to assume similar development patterns could eventually abut the County's designated Residential land use area. NDS's Advisory Position NDS staff has concerns with the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment from Agricultural to Residential. The land use change, and subsequent rezoning and development of the subject properties, could add a generous amount of estate -sized housing to an area that the City has seen outward growth and demand for increased residential growth. There is abundant land (approximately 190 acres) within the County's designated Residential land use area for County Residential infill development. And finally, the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council evaluation of the rezoning of the property to the north of the subject properties was met with some resistance, due to the area's proposed departure from the agricultural uses prescribed in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement. August 9, 2019 Page 5 While the rezoning was ultimately approved, a joint -consult between City and County staff was necessary. The subject application proposes a similar request, but is outside of the area identified for County residential infill development. Future Land Use Map Amendment FLUM-19-27760 of Adam Kos Application Background The proposed request by Adam Kos for a Future Land Use Map amendment is to change 115.37 acres of land designated Agricultural to Conservation Development and Commercial. This proposed amendment area is shown in Figure 3. The subject area currently contains A -Agricultural, R - Residential, and CH -Commercial Highway County zoning. The change in land use designation is intended to support a sizeable mixed commercial, residential, and conservation development project. Figure 3 shows the subject properties within the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment area. The proposed land use designations for each parcel are identified in the table. Figure 3. Location of Proposed Map Amendment �p pg I� 45 ! Po yrI oM1 1026477001 } f cn INO PEI AIO ;103422610102 to o Y n a l �' J no 1033110 � f 1034226003 G i on 103.3151005 51004 4 _ _ A � l4 1034251001 - �l4 Parcel 1D Current Designation Proposed Designation 1028477003 A ncutture Commercial 1028477001 Agriculture Commercial 1028477002 Agriculture Commerbal 1033151005 AgricuHure Commercial 10331510D4 A ncu3ture Commercial 1033126001 Agriculture commercial 1033101002 Agriculture Commercial 1033101001 A ncuiture Commercial 1034226002 Agncuiture Conservation Dexeloprnent 1034226003 Agricutiue Con servation Development 1034251001 Aegiailtiee Conservation Development August 9, 2019 Page 6 Analysis The application proposes changing the existing Agricultural land use designation to a combination of Commercial and Conservation Development land uses. The area along the northern end of the map amendment, proposed as Commercial, is already zoned R -Residential under the Johnson County zoning ordinance. The County land use plan still shows this area as Agricultural. This area is bordered by County A -Agricultural zoning to the south, Ryerson Woods to the northwest, and City property zoned General Industrial (1-1) to the east. While there is an adjacent intense zone in City 1-1 to the east, the South Central District Plan calls for this area to transform to public/private open space in the future, thereby removing any contiguity the subject area might have with an industrial zone. Table 3. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Land Use Category Fringe Area Policy The subject area is within Fringe Area C — Outside of the Growth Area. This Fringe Area designation calls for rural/agricultural uses, or uses consistent with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. Road infrastructure must meet the City's rural design standards. Given the envisioned build out for this development, the proposed land use map amendment presents a radical change from the existing County land use designation and from what is prescribed in the City/County fringe area land use policy. City Comprehensive Planning The City's South Central District Plan does not cover the subject area. However, the plan does call for the land to the east of the proposed commercial area at the project's northern end to revert to open space. NDS's Advisory Position NDS staff has concerns with the proposed Commercial map amendment application. While the subject area is outside of the City's South Central District Plan area, adjacent properties that fall within the plan call for less intense uses, with the southern portion of the Plan area prescribing open space and single- Existing FLUM Proposed FLUM Proposed FLUM Category Category Category Agricultural Commercial Conservation Development Typical Land Uses Agriculture (Crop Retail; Service; Office Protection of Production & Animal sensitive areas Husbandry); Limited Residential Residential Limited, case by case NA Permitted, but Development (no more than 2 acres must use cluster per dwelling); should subdivision be associated with food design (50% open production or space consistent with historic requirement) use Max Development Development intensity Development intensity Up to 50% of Potential not specified in the not specified in the acreage not Future Land Use Map Future Land Use containing Category. Category. sensitive areas could be developed for residential. Fringe Area Policy The subject area is within Fringe Area C — Outside of the Growth Area. This Fringe Area designation calls for rural/agricultural uses, or uses consistent with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance. Road infrastructure must meet the City's rural design standards. Given the envisioned build out for this development, the proposed land use map amendment presents a radical change from the existing County land use designation and from what is prescribed in the City/County fringe area land use policy. City Comprehensive Planning The City's South Central District Plan does not cover the subject area. However, the plan does call for the land to the east of the proposed commercial area at the project's northern end to revert to open space. NDS's Advisory Position NDS staff has concerns with the proposed Commercial map amendment application. While the subject area is outside of the City's South Central District Plan area, adjacent properties that fall within the plan call for less intense uses, with the southern portion of the Plan area prescribing open space and single- August 9, 2019 Page 7 family residential. Development of Commercial land uses, which could take on a wide variety of ultimate uses, could be out of character with both the current and planned built environments of the subject area. As was previously stated, the proposed development would be a radical departure from what is prescribed in the City/County Fringe Area Agreement. Based on the utilities and infrastructure needed to serve a commercial use, City staff recommends that future commercial development be located within the City's corporate limits. The proposed Commercial area is outside of the City's growth area; and therefore, annexation will not be contemplated. Additionally, the subject parcels contain several existing sensitive areas that should be left undisturbed, including unwooded wetlands, wooded wetlands, woodlands, highly erodible soils, and steep slopes. Lastly, City staff has general concerns about the viability of such a large-scale development in this location. The Iowa City area has seen construction of several commercial and mixed-use developments in recent years, many of which are located along the 1-80 corridor. The remote location of this proposed development, in addition to an already saturated commercial retail market in the area, could prove challenging. Redevelopment of the S&G Materials Sand Quarry for Conservation Development might be appropriate. It is possible that the area might one day benefit from a trail connection to Iowa City's southern trail network. City staff would like to be a part of any ongoing discussions on the extent of any redevelopment of the area for Conservation Development uses. Conclusion The decision on these amendments is the County's; however, staff greatly appreciates the opportunity to comment on these proposed amendments. Staff looks forward to continuing coordination with County planning staff on updates to the Fringe Area policy. VA V / - I Vvv v � VAA IAA\\\I\I Ii � II �I I�, II II' II I I /' / /, /I / ,//./. . l l V/� - vvv � vv � v I V1�, � / / Vv v - ' I I A I 1 V V A 11A III I II I I I II I I I l / // / / v vvv � J 11 I v / - / / I II l / ( / // // / / / 0, -- AvA vvv vv v / �- /� I vA\ \�v/- - I / / / /// '// l IIIIIIIIII III II IIII / / I / 1 �/ // //// / / �� / �v vvvvvv v` - � - \ / / 1 A - , �, / /, // / / Ij 1111111 /l1 I II 111 1111 I / '/ //// /// / , / /� vvv v vvvv / - r �\ / Vv_ v l / - / / , / /,// / l I I /111 /lI II 111111111111111111 1 I / // / ' / ' V -- v vvv v / `/ IIA v/ / // �� --/, // / J///I/IIIIlI1l 1111 IIII 1111 II11 1 I / ) 1 / //�//i/// / , // /) V// \ �� \ vvvvv�vv ��''�\ 4 )/�� i ),\ ' / / ��' / /// II I I I II I -// / �/ // /' / v V v - ,; ' ) }�/ / - /- ',' �i i �� - -, , / // //1/l/ III 11j1j11111111II1 / 1 1 ////// //� / / / 0/y > vvvv `vv ��- // / �� \1 A / - / / -i, -, // /// //// 1/II 11111 1111 1111 I I 1 v \ /// /// // // ,- // / v vv v v-� -V I //�/' ) l/ 1 -°/\ / ) / � / / / - j / j - - - --i i // / l//)/I/ IIII / I l ( //, // / / - / / ) / v �, A )/l(I J ( 1 ��( l / / / / / - - - � - /I /// // / / /I P I A v /� //// / v /v / > V / / / //// '/ - - ////// //1111!1 II A�0� V A /// / -- i v A 1\ / / l -- ( l // / / -- - -/ 11 lI 1 // / - J v v v _ I I 1\ I / / // ' i - - - - // / // \104\ \ \ \ \ // / / / / / - \ � I I I 1 1 1 1 \ \ / -- v- - V A- I (I //// --�- - _- i '///// l/ /I I I �1Sv A A /, // //// / ! v p /^\,----- / I I ////,ice--___- - --, ////'//l/l1//lI11A A 1 A I/ i /// / / -/ / i /` \ / v \V A A %>1 111 ) I I I / ///Ill/ l --_ __- -- ��/,/ // // lI ) 1 1 \ /i /// / / % / / , T� - - - - - I I I /l I f l 1 ' ' ' - - / / l f \ / / / / / I / \ \ / - - --- - / - _ - / �v i - - / - vvv / - / I - I\ - - I 4.1 1- - - - � ) \� // / / / / / / � // / " / - / \ \ \ I I \I i / v �\�� II I/1 Ill A �v _ - / l/ ,// / - I/ / / / - v v AVA I 1\A / / / /' --- --- v - AVA`AVAVAl All 1111(\ v(vv -/-( -/I//-/- >I/-)I//I 1/ //,/-/ / / // // / / �- - O� \�, VV -6 \VAA0 VV111 , / / � ' v/- /� - - - \ \ \\ l l\ \\ \\\\ \ \ \\\\ - _- � \\\\\� \, _ \ \- / \ \ �,- ( ! / / _ \ ' //'' / / / / ' ' - - f / / / /oi - �� b1b \ $_ 0 \ \\ 0\ \ \\ 1 l 1\ � 1 \ \ \ // \ \ \ \ // / " /of - \ fit\ \ ♦ O \\\0 1 ( \ l \ O / / I \ \\ \\� �\ \\\\\ \ \l\�\� I J \ / / / / \ I \ l / - \- l (-, \\ \ � �\\\ \ \\\y I I 1 \ \ 1 \ I1//,// / i - / / / s P, - - Q,[� - .(� \\\ ,\1 \ \ ,. 1 > ) V A \ \ 1 \ \vAvvvv�_� _ - _vvvv�v> - v vvA4V ) 1 I / // I ) -,/, - / / / / / p,� / 'Y �, AA 1 SIA 1 v i �l 1 �--� v"' IV/ / / / A A / - - - \ \ \ / / / \ ,,, - \ - \ � 1 / / / / / / / - / ! / f / - - - � - 1 \ 1 I I ) 1 I , I I / - \ \ / ),\) \l-1\ �\\\\\\\-,-- \\\ \\\\ 1��_.' // ///" /'- ' ' / r- - _ \ \ - \\ \ \� - I/ C l - /- \-\ \\ \ \ - /- - --/ / ., ) //-i \ \\\,\\\\\t(\\\\\//1\1117\\��- // / / �/i_- , - // i)o ////i/�' / - -/ - -- y \\'� \ 0 \ ' 11 1 1� ) 1 / / I I \ \ / ��v i ,// -- --, / 1111111 l)A� ////- / /i// /-- / ---- --- A\ ��1 Iv A \ \ - / / / / /- \ \ '/ - \ \ \ \ \ �60 , - - /- - -- / -- /' '// -) / / / / - - -\- � \ \\\ 1 \ ,) \ \ \ \ - / / - , \ \ \ -- i --- /'/ , /' - -'-' ' l // ' / I/ // ' - - -'- ' - - - -�- \ \\\ 1 \ \ \ \ --`- I _ \ \ \ \ / - , / --/ -, -// - / lI ( 1 I 1/'/� / // \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / i - / / I / _v--//','/-��\V \\ v- ' b�,i-'iii--'i-i//i->�/-i/ I1111j1111 I/ 1/iiia- ////////��/ -- --� -- -- \ vvv 1Al��l 11\ V ` I ' v -V �- -/ / / \ \ '� - / I ! / - / / - - - - - - - - \ \ 1 \ / , - A \ V A /, / - -„ - -i i i /, / / IIII l 1 / /�� - / / � // , / / - _ _ - �� v 1 \\ 1 v �) ) , v� - - i ' i - v v V A 1 \ i ' � i , �� - , � - - '- � ' - - � ' % '- - � t / J I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I V I i � / - - > - - � I ' / ' //, // / p�� ,) ` \ - \\ 1 1 II A\ �, \V v A � `V V A - - - / // - \ \ \ \ 1 \ I 1 1 - -/ ' /, i i 1 i / - / / - , ', i - -- / / , - - -, , - / / I ( 1 ' ' - / - / / / / / / // '/ 43 / I 1 --. \ - / /, - I - i / , �/ '//- -/ /- i --i' ,'-'-/////I 11 1 1 \ Ii ' - / /- / // j / // /// \ \ 1\ \ \- C / / A 11 I - --i - // /-- /- -- / / / /l - / / / / / // -\ �V� A \ IVA % \ ) 1 ) �v� A - I 1 I ( - -i , '-ii'� -- ,'_-" -/ i, i -i /� ,/ J-- '-/ -, ' // / ' '// / �� \ \ 11 �\ � \ \ \ - - / ' i \ \ I I 1 1 - 'i i - /i / ' - - / / - - - / / - , i , , / / / / - - / / / j -/ ' / / / A{ \ \ 1 I % \ ) I - / / / , / / /, , / - / / / / -- - / / / - / % - - - / / / / // / / I V"j: 1 \ \ I J I \ - I I I / / / /-, // /-i /// / - - - / / // _ C^� \ \\I 1 1 \ / 1 V A \ - - I / I I I t - ' i / ' '- i -' - / - ,\6_ i - -- / - - / / - _ - / / / / / / - , i � I N 1 1 v - v ) \ _ /I I I , /- //, -/ - ,- , i' - - -1 /- i / i- / - �� i/ / / // // / / / / I \ IA \\ 1 l v V A //---- --\1!11//1 /I`�- -,""�' /,/i -, I / ///'--'- '- i ✓,- \) '-//'/-'///-///,/// CSM 11111\I \\ \ )1 \\I\\ \\ I -\/- / / I I ! I //„ - // _- �'/- , / moi - - )�/ //, / /� ->- - / / - // / - / - - > lS 1111 1 1 1 \\, \\ \ 1 \\1 / / // - - / �- / / / / / / �J T \ V �, 1 \ ( \ \I \ V 1 A \ _ _ / // \ 1/l!ll /I l ` '//-"--- / / - i �- i - ' --' / / '-/, / , / / - - �p�\S" ,', ,'- i'/ // / // / / - 11 \ \- \ - - ///- Il/ II11 / /'- -' -',' -i -/-6� �Vf / / / / v -------- --- \ V )1�, V)1 I� A 1 l 1v\�\ I < / f - / / / i - / / / / I \ 1 / ///)\)I IIIIII\\,�'-' -, �, �-/--,,, / ��-��'--/i'//z//'/---�)'- �� ,/ ,/- ,i/'/,ii/- -,' - - - - - _-- Iv 11A A, N \11\1 \11111\I%I (1� 1 \ IA\\ -JI \' / \�- // III IIIIII-iii'--------'i-i ,', /�/---/,- /- / ////// ,-// _ - - - - - / �\ \11 \\\\l�I l I✓ \ \\\ ` / ' \'- \-- ///\IIIIIIIIl --- -- iii', ip_ ' //---,//// ---- , ,,-/ /////,/// -- \ ,, l \ \ III \ -� -� / / / i / i - ,' i' / /✓ - / - \ ' - / "/ /' / �' ' - / / \ ' \ �' '\I\\ '1,,� \ 1 \)11\1 �� - - / / / / \ \\ \ / / \ I/ /\ IIIIII\- -iii'-i' / i/---- '-- / /i ' '- //,-//'//// ) / / ) ` a \ 1 1 \I \\ , // III \ \\ \ \ �\ I \\ \\ \IIII) -iii//ii'-- /-iii/ii '%'_-----\ / i- --'-'-'//////j � ' I r\) I1 \ I \ I V l III -,i/- � i / - /- - - - v /'--' / l / (/ / //// // /// 1 \ `11 1 \ 1 \ , A /\) V A\ v / -/-/ ,- /, / �-- - G / / - - // / I ) I,AI v l \ V v \ I / I I I - ' - - / - - z - - / - v A / / f \ / V V A - i i � , i ' - i ' - - - / / - / /�-' - - - _ v A V I ) / / / / / / - - ` \ 1y, ,1 A I 1 ( - - r A A I I I A I I I I v - - - ' - , / / v / - " ", - - v \ V l / / / / ( / I I A 111 \ I V 1 � ) / \ \\\\ I v I v,- �- - - i j- I - - / / /---- �----� / UA V I I) 1 �, ) V 1 A / / / - - / / - - A \ 1 1 1 / 'l, IVV A V AIr / ) V v v I l 1 1 - ' - i / - / - - i i - - A I - / 1► 1 , \ � / - v V A --'-i -i /-'/ / v ' ' // /- ''--- - V I 11 II\ I / I / / --/ 1A 0_1 (V1V A-1 / v 1 v - - -/ - -,- ' 'l-- ' ' / / /i'i-i - _ / �f �I v I -vv - 11 1 v A I \ /-- I ) / /-/i, ,% i, i -/,,-- 1111111111 111 11 \1 1 I / II / I J a ) \1 1 111 ` ` I \1\ \ - _\ - _ / / / /�i/ i/ - -, i-- , ( 11 I IIIII I I I l l \\ 1 I ' I ll l 1 ) (-I 1 ( \ I \ \ / / / / / / / i -/ '/ ' , , - - VIII I ` \ 1 \ \ 1 \ I\1 1 \ ) i \ 1\ \ \ \ \ / / / / / l / // i / //i i/ i DZ, ' i 111 I I \ i I I I I I I i I I 1 I \ \\ I l \ \ \ __ _ - - \/) ` 1 \ 11 % 1 \ti \1 \ \ \ \ \\ / 1 \ / /, // / / /,/.�/ \ I l/ L I If 1 I I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ I 1 e 1 1 \ \ 6 ( / // / I A v v v / ` 1 1) ,1 I \1lV ', v ( a0 �� v v I I / / / // // / ' / // /�� 111111 I I l l ( ( I \ \ r7 \ \ / / / / qi // //,/// /, I I I I I \ /- til l 1 1 1 / 1 (0 \ / / / / �' / //// /////////- I 0I iII111 II Il 111 l I ) 1 I I ( ) / ,-/ ,/1l 1 1\ V 1 1j11 Vv� I / \ v \ \v-, - > / ,- - / ,) , // / / /// / III / / / A I, Ill 1 \ / v \ -/ /-/' // // / // //////''-////// 1 1 , )11111111II1 / /1 f/ / r 1 /1 // // �Qj $\\ A 111\ \ 11\ -�� V ( / --/ AV A \I � r /, �' // / l j ////r // / l/ I ) lull// /// (I (I 111 / I/ / V \ 1V 11 / /� v v / / / / ' - - / 'i'/ / % / / lI l 1 I ( 1 \ / Q) �\ 1 I 1A 1 / A` - �V A% v \\ / / / / / //,' ( l I // IIII O I I / 0 ( I �\ - / /J' - - / II I / n \\1\ //I- \ I I � ! I \ 1 / /'/- // / / - - / /ii / \ III III I I1 I 11/ l 11 I I I \ \ - l �t \I \ I 1 \ I\ \ \l / / I 1 I / - ' , / / / / / / / / / / � I J l 1 / / ( I FUTURE DEVELOPMENT I $ I / / , '-/ - - / I / / / / / // \IIII 11 1, ( I \ I � 31.39 AC - \ -, I \ I 1 1, I I \ `/ I / I \/ / / -- / I / I 1 / / l/l/ / t IIII((ll/I//0!/ I 1 1 1, \ \ \ - - / -( \ II` 1\\ \ \ \ /1 /\ /, / \\ / / ) i l / / I l // // / / / 1 Nom' 1 / 11111, 111 Ip / / t0 I / I 1 ) I \ \ - - 1.367.166 SF \ \ \) \ \ % \ \ , \ I / \ I // / // I (,IJo I I l 1 I'1 1 I o LaMD 1-0R`: AFF G )CSE 006146 \ 1 I /////(// nW f ( O/\OI(////// )// // ( /1r \ 1\,1 \ \ \ / \ I \� 1\ 1 \ / l/ // /// �/ / � " I N'' llI /I /1) I I I \ ti \\ 1 \, \ \11 \ / I \ ��` N / s / / / / v/ / l I V v t I I 1 SO ' A A I \1 IN A6Cl RPANOE WITH THE LAT THEREOF REGORPEV- IN,v�P�L"A,T�,�,,.B.,�O,�O,K 51 AT \ 1 1 J / ' / / / // / / � I /f /I 111 / / I I I \ 1 ) \ \ , / , \ 1 \ \ l , I IPACE 1717 OF THE REOORIXS \\OP THE JOHNSON 6aNr I" RE6Q TGVCI�'S OFFICE ' / , / / / '/ // 1111(1 ) 1 11 I I \ \ \ 1 \ \ / / // / / / / 111 j 11 I (I / / / / /1 ) 1 I / I I I ) \ 1 0 1 1 1 \ ) 1\ I( 1 1 I ( I / // ! I 1 1 I I f I I / - A 1 1, A \ / 1 V / Ill ( I I // / I/'/ ////// ) \ 1 /l((/I,/111 /1/1//1 // // / I I I I / � VAI 11V, I 11 I OP ) \\ \ / 1 // /// / / / II I 1 11 f / / / / / r , \ O \\ 1 / s D I / / \ \ \1 00 -\ 1 / I 1 / l l / N / \ l l 1 11 /) I ��.II /aG1L \ \ \. / \ , \ \ \ \ / / / I , / // / �� D /((�� D (%�,�_ 1 1 1J �7v g L5 IJ \ \ ` - \ 1 \ \ \ 1 \ I\ 1\ \ \ 1 O 11 I I I l ^� Lrfi� � �J f l / I/ I l I \ \ 6 \' I \ i1 1 \ 1 \ 6� r- l I l 1! \ p p D S2 i ' l\\' (' \ J I I 1 , I ( / /(/ / ( 20\ 3029 111//11, �-/0 [ ��g ]�n - \ \ 1 \ � , , \ 1 1 // l l (( (10 1 1 1 I 111 11 1 l �l /( o I d i t � V I �% A v ) 0 11 1 11 1 1 1 , P v E 1 4 -� E 104 N, \ A 1 � I ) I/ / I ! //l// / IIII 11 VIII 11I ) / / / / / � gP1I v I v _ // 11 E T E w f \ 1 III, v1 11vv I v1 v( \ C I vvvv 1 ^ IN AGGGRDANGE WITH PLAT THEREGF 9 ., Y� \ O p D o 1I 1 by 1 I I 4� l l 1 � 1 // I I / 1/ // �EIORDEP IN PLAT 60�tC 60 AT PACE 23 1I I I I I 1 1 1 1 v4 � g v v A \VV 1 v `��Z 1' ) I ) \ / / !/ OF THE RECORDS OF THE datI�ON 6ONFY II11 l I1 I I I 1 I I I 4 991 1 \ - ri ` �� l l / v I l ( I IZEGORDER' OFFICE I (/ I I I I v 6S , 1 A I A ) v A S �If /I I ll / /l/ II 1111 II III St FSR -11 1` 1\ \ 11 I )� �G• / I C I I I I 1 V A \ e ` 1 I I I A ) 1 C 4 / I I ) I / / / / l 1 1 1 I/ / / SO�S� I fl IIIII IIIII l I 11 I ) I / ) / I / \ I 9>�� zV �� b) 1 , \ N ` \ - I ) / 1111/l/I/Ir I//) o1P v 111111111)11°I / ( / / ( ) vv VO&�i�9� c� \ I 1vv 1/ I / I I �I/ II/Ill// v lI/I / G1� v i//1111//I( IIIII l 1 l l v1 V V \) % 1 ) 11 \II A / v) / / - 1 c -,I l( (/l lI l 11 I! I III 11 Iffl1 ) 1 I // ( / I I v v I, 101 A / I /--v v v I I I)/ l/ l l l l try / /// 1 1 1 III (I ( I I I I I A (Si A v v \ \ \ II , l 1 A\ Q 1 \ 1 V v v I IJJ111I1/ I V f / IIM > A IIII 1(l(l/1111 )I I 1 / \ O\ I -v t- v - \ � � \ %,I \ 11 �V A t V A /I \ IIS/� V A v I( 1 1 11 / I A O I I) l I I I 1 v v- v- v I - - fl V %1\ , A I) 1 - /I A I /( 1,1 / v ( / I I I - 11 1111 11 I /,I� / I l / 1 l 6' v I -v__ -/ � -I- � V ' 1\ 1 (0V A A \ \ - v 1`-' / I ( / I//(// (/ I I I I A IIIIIIIIII I I Ill /I 11 /' I I I I � -v v v v v 1/ / V\\, 1 1, \V A l) f v �\ 1 I I I III I/ I I I I //(��/� p 1 A I I 1 1 1 111 1 // / ,/ \ ` - v v A A \ �O 1 \ 1 %( l � A �A V A - I v // // \ AM[0D'rOG� / / 11 l/ I1 j 1/11111 / / / / I �O v �v /// v A � � AMA C ( II A J / , / / I I l l I I/ 10 / I l // / I (D v aD ll/// (/ /// v ( l l I \ ( /III / 11 f I I / I v \� \I ' ` 1 `/ -V ' / pLaG)C EL , I ( \ 1 v / - / r 1 1 vv vv v, ( III Ill/ 11 �w ,-v //I/111 Il //,� I - 1 v ov v I v \ v v v // ) I I/ I 1� l / I ISI I l(// I/111/ 11 // / 1/ \ IV A V 1\I', ( 1 A\ T A I ) I v I I//// 20013030 /'/I 1 , Iv_ ( 0 5 I l/1 /I II PO / ) 1 1 A) 1 , h /1 ,o / l v s� I l I l% R 0 PUBLIC WELL V � 1\ I I v I v 1 1 ( \ 1 v i 111 f `j VA \ / //1 // / /EA El NT I l I � I \ \ I1, \1 1 1 A I v / ill/ I l / / �O vv1N AG�GRDANGE WITH THE PLAT T1 RIJF \ / / / / / I I 1 I ! l 1 1 v - I ' - - - - - - _ _ - 1 ` v �- - - _ - - - , - - \ \IT \\ \ I , � , , I 111) \ ) ll I l l /\ IIII / A \ REEL- €D IN PLAT $OOK 60 AT PAC�iE 24 / / I / / I 11 I , I I • / I I A 1 / / I I / \ //I///\�Fn1FREGORIOFTI1EJOfjN501JGLtJNTYv `- // / v -r--- - ------ -------- ------------- 1- ----- --'----- I I 1 1 \ \ vv IZEGORDER'S G IGS / / ( II lI �f 1/ �I ) _ - - - - - 1511ALIP1'-_ASEiv1ENT - - - - -_-_- - - - - - - - _ - _ _ - - - �- - �--IiTILLT�EASEMEN� - -�� -� O 1 -1-� ---- G�- - - lllf / vV OI1I/Ill/ �\vvv vv SSC_/�A� l/ IIIIII II �� - �� - -�-- --- -- -- vvvvv - - / /// W �______ W___-__, W - W- ----- ----- VP_- W W-- _ - _ v - - - --_T- v r,1 /)1 ) _vvv vvv - ��' _/1 ll o' - - - ------ -W- - // /// lIIQ II// vvvvAvv �Y �,'/- /v -- - /l /1 !ll l 1} '%A � _ - - - `=- -----o 00_ --_---------- --_--_ _ -- 1/AA/A1 TllAI R!1An Qr - 4 V ' \ � \ v p - - - v v 1� / / / - _ - - rr-Pvr�r ry GAD G� 1. Q 0 0 D 89' 5'16"W �v -49.21' ' / '/ / )) / X �t.2or. - - T - S89'25'16'�N o 0 20% , 1 20% 2 50%�► v vv ` - - - / ' - / / / ' 8I - ------ O ----- �1----- I v v v v - / / / // / / 1 / T----��-"�'L'�'�� 185.00' 15' UTILITY EASEMENT 175.00' 163.32' 0) N49'26'307 \ _ - " - / ---- ---------- ------ �- \ �ROPOSED \ \ \\ - - / / 1 I - � 248.21' 15' UTILITY EASEMENT 175.00' o - 1 I 1 1 I / t0 I vv v v / /, - v / / / / /// / I / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\ ► / BIGHT -OF -WAY ! / / (1 1 1 11 1 ( , l vvvv v v - / / / - /) / / / //q / 58E77' / I� \ ) A \ \ (\A AAV-- - /- -.�� - // / / / / / A I G , I / I IIII I l)Il l v v / v � vv- -- /- // / /// /// - , A ,1 I I / v IIIIIIVA v v vvvvv -/ 1v ---- / /// /1/ / ( 39.27' I i 1 I 39.27 \ A I j0.0b 1 1 \ 1 l,I �( TING v �1)v\\vAIv�v vvv vvv �v / _ ///ll l lI/ / Il i ` �" \ 1 R11IT-OF-WAY )I O -vvvvv ) v ) ) )v /----_--/'/'/-"/ l ( I �. I / , II , 1 ,1 v v V A // / /// a,/ I 0 0/ 1 A I A I, � I /1 I I I I y\\VA \ \\ V ,/ / / /,// - -- / �( / 1 1 A I�� X101 Z V % 1,V ( I 1\ 1V f l 111 //' I \ \ \ / /-//// - _ -/1 �t 2 IN, ,NSI 4 5 0 6 \v N, \`' 11 / �\ 1 A 1 1 1 1A V A � J / / // /-- _ / GLV / / 1 I p NI IN O0 0 +�- ) 1 A 11 1 1 / I ` , / _ - - / l 0 1.14 AC 1.00 AC o A• 1 I / I l 4 ) 9 // / - - ( N 49,866 SF I ( I 1 I 1.20 AC o 43,750 SF a 1 ~ ) 1 \ j / I , I 1 / .1�1 1 / I V I I I I( I I I ) v I )/ I / - / / 1 ) o LO 0 1.09 AC - A rn 1 ,I 52,366 SF a / / 6 / /U // / )- / _ - h / / l v v Izj 2 iw� 47.635 SF \ A A 1\ I I 1 �t \ / I - / / ' ) Ld Ig v / I\, I, I l 1 �o�p ( / ( / - / 3.66 AC � I w w I 1 - V - I , / 4 v / I l l 11 / I r l/l)l/ / / v I 0 I(O I <1 v A A A- \ I) / l I_ - I ) l I I / / I // - v 159,548 SF w I I V A 1 1 /- - EAJSEMENT TER DETENTION / ( 1 1 1 1 I" Y � "LII LI�J uLr'�1LIA:J� LI E l 'may/\ / / - `' �) I�� 0 0 F t A A' A\ \ \ 1- V 1 v\vv\\ //� - �I <01 / / / / - - - �, : 6. 0 : - - - - - - - - - - X7 00` -15 STORM S W R UTILITY EASEMENT - - - AS IkE&OWED IN 1506K 604 AT PA iI - - - t N / 1 1 I 1 A 1 11 111 l I REOORDS OF THE �JOHNSON'G / / / ' \ A /\ (( v V v \ ,CC V - - - - x-0( 90'- - - -� I - - -24&09= - - - - - -1- -29& - - - - - - - - - V v cP I % I v - - \ / / 3 - , o? RECORDERS OFFIOE / / �- v v / �� bI I v t \ - 0 //// v -_ _ / � I I � , I I I I I / / / / / / / _ p , ��_ �� 0 I tail It�i I C /0A� V / / / / v (O _ ISI Int 0 V�JnV A 1� // // / /// v i (� tJ ��y9p�R N �cJ _ v �l I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I 1 / //// v �/ / V - I 63(0 1 �W � ESLI�,� 'L l v t �IV�{f✓vA ----� - I 1 I I / I V I I I I I I I I /// v o. _ 1 / � 4 �4��y� _,,�&5> ab A 3 V 0 1 t v) I l II II 1 1 � \ o vti �� I t to I �e Q a \ \ / 2 V / v v ti 9 1.04 AC o I� V I / I I I I I I I I I ///\ l o - - R� Fo i ,y� o \ ( I a" v 1.26 AC d I l \/ \ I I I I I I I I P v v _ ,- 45,143 SF t - 1.15 AC o I / / �p , N / / / I 1 1.22 AC d \ I I I / 9 �� ,"y� v A v �. 53,251 SF /J� �7{C 50,000 SF N 54,779 SF I \ I I I I I I I I \ v f I I L�`�9l`S \ V A A - A O ��i 4 'v` , 0 A v*1 I I V A / vg v v / �� I t^ A v� t v\ I I v ��_ „ v v _�OI�TLOT� P (O; , <�� N, I I I I I _ - v vv v v / v - - ► / ► 38 79' 1`� 4 �t / I \ V I\ �� III 1 I I 1 Fas�MENrWc_&Z v v v v v - OPEN SPACE / v 2s.ss' Q I �� I I III \ I , I 1 / IN WOK - 0k�+�PM#_,41 01< v A / - L 3.37 AC v I l t \ �y / t \I 1 THE RECORDS 01 WM60W"� vh v l 16,642 SF / v / t � � / t �/ / / / - _ �v v I - _ _ 1 30.00' - - - - - ILITY EASEMENT 190.62'/ 46.06' j RECGPR'S OFF}CE v v 7 \ l -/ / / - \ \ � \\ \\\ - - - / \ \ 6? 42.001 _�_ 144.74 15'UT__ �__ / ___ 200.00'_-___ _ - 1 11 ! \ \ 1 I \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ I / I 1 � I \ o \ v 1 /1 v v vvvv 11 v / // - vv 1 1 / I �v v l �� / ` II 111 _ _ � C r - IV \ ti - -�- - - - - / r� -.moi- _ \ V A V A 1 1 1 I l I / - ' - /- __ -1� / - v v 309, W W / W W - - 0 RIGHTO-OF-WAY v vv v vvl I1 I 111 / - - ' �► Eonenc� - - 2.00 v\ - v V A 1 \ \ l 1 v , i / / V 1 1 I I -5 - - - / / \ v 3 �� 39 1.30% 0 0 1.00% 5.00% / v vI v v \ VA \ - -/ / v d - �� - /�\ /-A\ 2 �� icvnvv� -� �, VAI\ ', v v Iv v A IAA VI 1 - - -- A I I I I I I I co 9 A A - ___-___-___ __ __ -_ __-�_ - 11 ISTING \ \ - , /, , - 1 I N 90 \ \ \ - \ ''3.00' 312.72' / 15' UTILITY EASEMENT / 222.48' 56.29' i 70. 1' EX V- v �\ \\ ll VAA\ 111 1 1 1 -- - - / - 1 1 )I 111111111/I 1 / 10 661.7 / 1 vv v o 0 �!`--------- ------ ----- --- I I V A 1 1 \ G T -OF -WAY / _ v V A 1 v - / - / / / / v V 10 7 / v n /� Q 39.27. - 6.36' RI H `vI 11111 / - i %�' / ' AA)\IIIIIIIIII Ill I _ .� QYn - a I I / 43.40' rr I A V I I A vv v i` A\ \ / / - / ) _5.00' ao 0.15' M M _---_/ / I �� I \ \1 1 \ )\ \) 1 111 1 1 1 1 1 - / / // / - ,/ / - \ 1 1 I 1 I / NJ - \ `\ -8 _ - - m IJV �� IJ VI b �� 19.20' - / - m 1 1 \ l l I vv V 1 11111 v / / / // - ,' - �I �I� I I 1E 1� - 553'04-W -voo. - l / / 1 1 1 1 \ 11 ) I I I I I l �'/ /'/ / , ' , ' -- A A 1 III I - - , 1 13y00' \\\ III I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 _ '' - - ^O _ / M o I� m \ 1 BECTNOIJ V 33 I c�IJ V RM I 1 ) ~ EXISTING \\ // // // -' / / �I IJ I�Yl�� - ` 01 \ %'� 8300{ RIGHT-OF-WAY \ 1 1 1 1 1 \\ /- - 1 1 I I 660 /1 3' ' I I I \\ \ /,/, / _ 1V c� )1 l \\\ I _ I 1.69 AC I 1 \ 1 \\ \ \ \ - / / / / ' / \ \. \ 1.60 AC 4A 1 73,679 $F I ', ! 1 V v \ //// / A I /1 P1� m / 1 , I I I \ 1 A I\ 1 A \ v v v v vv v v -- / '' - V 11 1 I/ I I III I I I I I h- I I I I / - A rn v 1 l / 69,534 SF 4 I V to O 1 \\\\ \ \\ \ /,i /' - _ 1 II I 11 f Y I v l�, \ - \ I �t 1 \V v _ 1 $ / 111 v \\IVA \VA \V ) X11 V 1 --/, /---- v\ 1 1 i I �I I I I / \ N \vim o v I /, �{ I I / I �' �I I \ \1A A A 11, - -- ,- '- V I 1 11 1 I I I h I I I / V o. A , V A 1 iA I 1� II11�\\\�1\)111111]\1A - -'- _ 111111/,I 11111111 I I I ' I / 6'. v v ro�N I I I v I v I I IAA \ 1 II 11 11 I I I 1 A - _ - - - I I , / / / / / / / / / / l /1/ / I / / / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 I - v v ' - V V I I l / I G� \ ) \ A VA,- - ----v A -- I . V A v- I I ll 1 I \ 1 d l I ---_ I l I l I I I I / 65 / I / ,\ \ 1 \, vv_---- v 1 ll III // 11 1 I / / 8-- / I \ / 1 p \ Il 1 A --- ----- I I I A- (_ / / I 1 A 1 11 v---_ _- - v v I I V1 I I I III 1/ I I I I Ill 1 I ' N I/ I I - 312.87 A\ - - v I 1 0 206.11' 71 1 1 1 1 \ \f \\\v _-- v A 1 1 1 I/ f) A I I I I I I IIIIII I I I I III I 1 l I I I I 1 / /-- � /_ v \) \\ - 1 \V 1 1 I A I I\ \ IA ----- I I I / 11111 I I I I I II I I 1 1 / V / 1 tS. / \_ v h i I \ 11 11 1 v ,` -_--- A 1 1 1 1 1 1 // I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I l 1 I l l 1 1 1 1 I I l / /---- l O 1 v t0 , I l 1 A I V A Vv v II 11 -\I- - \ \\\I 11111I'III / I/I /IIIIIIIIIiill 1l 11 I I I I I - 1 1� `- 111 II \ \ �- _ v / / / cr / 1 1 I ` - - V A /l/ll 1' '// l !/ l/ II I II I I I 1 I1 11 i 1 ) I I / � \ 1 1 1/ - v 1 e l( l 1/ Il I l /// 1 1 1 // I ''I III 11 I I I , I / v I1 I A I I I I v A 1 v\VA I /////I / // I I I I I I ( G� 1A I V I 1 r Il \ \,)W'111///////// ////// /I //// 1 I /---6S /' / - ?- / O B I II 0 \ \ \ \ \ 1 � I ) / J/J/ / /// / // // / 11 l / / / l I / l I I / 6 - I _ / S• O, I 1 V' v UTLOT-C-- - z IIII / ; O l i lll� ;''�/i/%�;ii,//%iii% //// /l////l///I 11 111 I 1 1 I I �� OPEN SPACE to INFRASTRUCTURE l I I / / 6 , / / / // / // /, / , / / / / / / I / �', \I \ EXISTING I / // / // / / / // / / / / / / / I I lit 181.905 SF \ STORM WATER DETENTION 1 � I\ /^h // /,) / / /// / / / / / /i / I / 1 / / I I I I 1 1 1 1 P \_ - ( \ 2.77 AC \ \ $ p0. 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY l f ( 1 1 I�rh, /O / /(/ / � ( / v'/ / ( / I l l / I I l 1 1 1 �O'��.fY1P ✓ 120.792 SF 11111 1 i \ I I I I 111 1 1VIl I- ,\ , Ilvvvv��vv\v1\\ VA 111 1 1 1 !/ / / YOB&9, 09�� vV V v -1 - I V� I I A ) I VA\ ,VAVv)v vvv v v v A \ / V,f-"' g' /- $ vt I 11 I I I A ( 1 1 1 \ V A A Av Vvv �v vvvv v vv v V A 1 1 1 A l l / / / / R�� / S 4p4, A � co / Z 1 1 , I 1 1 \ \ \ \�\ \\\- \\ \ \11 / 1 / / 1 I \1\\\) 11\ 1 Ill\I\\ 1 - 011\ I I, I I I I I I 1 1 I O I 10 I I / / / / - I / -/�� , I 11 1 1 I / I// / 1 / p l I / v - s d i I I 1 1 1 /1//I/ / III' j\ II'CDiII IIIl1 654 ' / X93 1 1 11 I I I I I I I I I I ////////////// II II/l)(0 11 O 1 I I 1 / I t\ 0, 1 �n I III I Il I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 (! l/ll/ ////// / ///// // 11/I1// (0 1O/ I I // 1 --- - \ f\ \ ^\ \ %% 1 11 I I I II / ////, // //// 1 / f(0 -- - \ I l I 1 1 1 1 / t0 N� �� I I I I I I I I Ill/ IIIIIIlllill�Il l/'/ //////� i/�l1/IIII 1 1 1 I I l ' - - ' / ?g4 / - _ v v I / �II � 357 0 q'W ' 1 I III I /( ' / I I co /- �4`� -- ).. --�v- I \I A �/ I I I I I 1111 l / / I I I 1111111 111 AI \1111 I \ \ V I / I 1 / 4 � \ / v 1 ,v 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1/ I l 1 I V A V I / / I , I I I I I ) 11 IIlI lI IIII I 1II111IVA\ \V VA1 I I lI // 1 /l l l I 1 // / I \/ /� / A v X11 OGS 1 , I 11 I I I I I I l I I I ) / I I I I I I I I 1 1 I / / I 1 I /-/ _ l l I I I III 1 1 1 I / / / ) v V / f I l / l I/ l/llI IIII IIII 11(1 III////I//l IIII I I I / I I / I - v �// v� - G� �v , 1 �� - 111 ) l ll l ) I I I I II1111\I 11 /I /(1 /I I \I I 1 I I I / / - - �� / A ) v (. v s - V lll I / l / l/ l l/ 1 / ///// 1 II 11]11111111\11 AVAV A\1111 AA I 1 - �/ - - - - '�`l`� 2 V A. \ 1 ' v _/v w'V 1 1� �- / /1////// //// /)/l 1111\110 \)AAI I I /)I I I I/ // // v ' �0v'� \ ` / ,�i vvv 00 \ , III /////// ////I/I 1)I 1 'VII A\1111//! I I - - - - - 4 ,•� I v % I--- -��\ � v/ \ \ --1 11 / l / / / l I l I (( l / - -i ,'i ///// / 111 1 \III I I I / / - \ �tR \ O / (I1/- i/ , //l/Ill///l'II 1j111 ' - - - / - - - - - - - - -)/-- ( fn 1 ( 1 I I / /III(///'1I'/ ' j' //-j///// 1// II III 1 111 1 1 1 I I v - V / v- I / I r I 111 111//IIIV11 A vv// //1/ //// IIII X111 v / / v - - �_ - - v, v vvvv vv 0 vv 1 1 / / (/ v I - - - - _ _ - - - _ _ - / 414.71' S89'19'Or7"W 1/ v v _ \ / -L I I \ �\ \�\ -\ \ � \- - r- - - ` - - G , 1 / j 1 \ \ \\ ` \\\ \ \\ \\ � \\ \ I -I j p 1R _ /� ) vvvvvv vvv vv,, IIIII I e 0 /p� D ED 000 (�v v11 I / / 1 ) / I I ) v 1vVv vvvv VA A VA 11 I l 1 I/ pE9 `f�'S> I / Lr1��0 cJ 6-- p"' 1 G� A,'I I / / / I I V A ) A v v v v \ ) 1 A> A I f ��,6� I / g4 - do A 1 1 1 V\ / / / / / / / I / I A ) III / , / , III J I 1 I 1 VO t}C , 09 / v / / 11� O \ / / / / l / / / / / - /� '/ i / �/ / ) / /III 1 1 III / / I I I I I 1 I I I 1 Q �$Y� / ) [] PACE 134 Gf THE ff,r,� OF IN S 36 T - / / ��v o 111 1V 1 / I I. _ ,111 , , \ 1. c:A,sh.;:1\,sh.;:)-u1r-\,sh.;�1-u1rN.dwq, 1/1u//OrO 11:71[01 AM PRELIMINARY PLAT 218 COMMERCIAL PARK JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA us PLAT PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 7� 0 10 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 "=100' DESCRIPTION OWNER/SUBDIVIDER: CJ MOYNA & SONS 24412 HWY 13 ELKADOR, IA 52043 ATTORNEY: MICHAEL J. SCHUSTER P.O. BOX 609 GUTTENBERG, IA 52052 PLAT/PLAN APPROVED by the City of Iowa City City Clerk Date: UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS SHOWN HEREON, MAY OR MAY NOT, INCLUDE SANITARY SEWER LINES, AND/OR STORM SEWER LINES, AND/OR WATER LINES : SEE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR DETAILS. A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 28; A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE S89°25'16"W, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 431.87 FEET, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE CRANDIC RAILROAD, THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019126, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 63 AT PAGE 225 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S12°56'56"E, ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 1140.39 FEET; THENCE S77°03'04"W, ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 30.00 FEET; THENCE S12°56'56"E, ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 204.69 FEET, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33, AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019126; THENCE S89°19'07"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, AND THE SOUTH OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019126, A DISTANCE OF 414.71 FEET; THENCE N25°46'44"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019126, A DISTANCE OF 133.75 FEET; THENCE N62°24'47"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 554.04 FEET; THENCE N18°37'55"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 251.46 FEET; THENCE N75°53'04"W, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, AND THE SOUTH LINE OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019127, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 63 AT PAGE 226 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, 691.90 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019127; THENCE N10°11'45"E, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019127, A DISTANCE OF 533.29 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE S89°25'16"W, 349.21 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2015030, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60 AT PAGE 24 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE N49°26'30"W, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2015030, A DISTANCE OF 34.62 FEET; THENCE N10°09'21"E, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 335.51 FEET; THENCE N3W46'25"E, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2015029, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 60 AT PAGE 23 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, 382.29 FEET; THENCE N5W20'40"E, ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 182.93 FEET, TO THE NORTHERLY MOST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2015029, AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DEPICTED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 819 AT PAGE 283 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE N58°18'07"E, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID DEPICTED PARCEL, 467.10 FEET; THENCE N38°04'54"E, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 452.99 FEET, TO THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF SAID DEPICTED PARCEL; THENCE S47°00'34"E, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID DEPICTED PARCEL, 330.54 FEET; THENCE S23°43'14"E, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 181.15 FEET; THENCE S12°49'35"E, ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, 84.96 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DEPICTED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 819 AT PAGE 289 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE; THENCE S11 °49'42"E, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID DEPICTED PARCEL, 417.34 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, AND A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OAK CREST HILL ROAD; THENCE S12°33'01"E, ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 505.99 FEET, TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 33, AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2019126; THENCE N89°25'16"E, ALONG SAID NORTH LINES, 116.86 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS 65.15 ACRES, AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. PLAT APPROVED BY: JOHNSON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: CHAIRPERSON DATE NOTES: 1. ALL LOTS AND OUTLOTS EXCEPT OUTLOT "A" ARE ZONED C - COMMERCIAL 2. OUTLOT "A" IS ZONED CH - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL 3. ALL LOTS SHALL HAVE INDIVIDUAL SEPTIC SYSTEMS 4. ALL LOTS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO A PUBLIC WELL AND WATER SYSTEM TO BE MAINTAINED BY A PRIVATE OWNERSHIP ASSOCIATION. STANDARD LEGEND AND NOTES - PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES - CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES ------------- - RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - - CENTER LINES EXISTING CENTER LINES - LOT LINES, INTERNAL - LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED - - - - - - - - - PROPOSED EASEMENT LINES - EXISTING EASEMENT LINES _0w -BENCHMARK (R) - RECORDED DIMENSIONS 22-1 - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER -EXIST- -PROP- $ $ - POWER POLE � � - POWER POLE W/DROP � � - POWER POLE W/TRANS - POWER POLE W/LIGHT = =( - GUY POLE * * - LIGHT POLE O - SANITARY MANHOLE r -FIRE HYDRANT gyp° 8 - WATER VALVE OO ® - DRAINAGE MANHOLE ❑ - CURB INLET X ( X FENCE LINE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER - EXISTING STORM SEWER �< -PROPOSED STORM SEWER W - WATER LINES - ELECTRICAL LINES T - TELEPHONE LINES G -GAS LINES - - - - - ' - - - CONTOUR LINES (2' INTERVAL) PROPOSED GROUND - EXISTING TREE LINE 0 �2> - EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE & SHRUB _* - EXISTING EVERGREEN TREES & SHRUBS THE ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED FACILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, WHICH ARE TO BE PREPARED AND SUBMITTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS DOCUMENT. TYPICAL STREET SECTION N.T.S. R.O. W. 30.00' � 30.00' R.O.W. 16.00' 14.00' 14.00' 16.00' 6" INTEGRAL PROFILE GRADE 417%■► CURB ♦2.00% 2.00%♦ ♦4.17% 7" PCC PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION PER SUDAS SECTION 2010 IZAAK WALTON ROAD SE TYPICAL STREET SECTION N.T.S. R.O.W. 30.00' � 30.00' R.O.W. 17.00' 13.00' 13.00' 17.00' 6" INTEGRAL PROFILE GRADE 4.17%y CURB ♦ 4.17% ♦ 2.00% 2.00%♦ 7" PCC PAVEMENT SUBGRADE PREPARATION PER SUDAS SECTION 2010 GREENVIEW ROAD SE, OAKSIDE ROAD SE 218 COMMERCIAL PARK JUYIIVJUIV l UUIV Y, IUVVA LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 65.15 ACRES CIVIL ENGINEERS LANG PLANNERS LANG SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revislon 01-08-20 PER CITY REVIEW -JDM PRELIMINARY PLAT 218 COMMERCIAL PARK JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC Date: 12-12-19 Designed by: f=ield Book No: RLA Drawn by: Scale: JDM 1 "=100' Checked by: Sheet No: RLA Project No: IOWA CITY 6839-012 of: 1 I hereby certify that this engineering document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Iowa. iiiix :L� \\\0Xo0\pF1ES31ONq Q 1,,,111 ,� o%%/ i \\\\,\ �'= 2 � RONALD =w z RONALD L. AMELON, P.E. Iowa Lic. No. 14201 -U=_ L. €m= =j \MELON =� My license renewal date is December 31, 20-. 14201 % "I �' /////�°oiiiii IOWA \\\0000\\\� ///ll/IIIIIIIIIIIIIII111\\\\ Pages or sheets covered by this seal: SEAL i " f 2' !1 11 ) , . ' a n; i 218 COMMERCIAL PARK JUYIIVJUIV l UUIV Y, IUVVA LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 65.15 ACRES CIVIL ENGINEERS LANG PLANNERS LANG SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revislon 01-08-20 PER CITY REVIEW -JDM PRELIMINARY PLAT 218 COMMERCIAL PARK JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC Date: 12-12-19 Designed by: f=ield Book No: RLA Drawn by: Scale: JDM 1 "=100' Checked by: Sheet No: RLA Project No: IOWA CITY 6839-012 of: 1 SOILS MAP '` :L� .g, 1 i �. 1 A r, ,. .,� i " f 2' !1 11 ) , . ' a n; i 1" �� II !_ ., s i - I�ulA.lf93t"�'"` II ... �• -' .- I � „. N0. SOIL TYPE SLOPES 65F LINDLEY LOAM 18-25 % 80D CLINTON SILT LOAM 9-14 % 453 TUSKEEGO SILT LOAM 0-2 % 520 COPPOCK SILT LOAM 0-2 % 687 WATKINS SILT LOAM 0-2 % 688 KOSZTA SILT LOAM 0-2 % 778 SATTRE LOAM 0-2 % 793 BERTRAND SILT LOAM 1-3 218 COMMERCIAL PARK JUYIIVJUIV l UUIV Y, IUVVA LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE 65.15 ACRES CIVIL ENGINEERS LANG PLANNERS LANG SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revislon 01-08-20 PER CITY REVIEW -JDM PRELIMINARY PLAT 218 COMMERCIAL PARK JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC Date: 12-12-19 Designed by: f=ield Book No: RLA Drawn by: Scale: JDM 1 "=100' Checked by: Sheet No: RLA Project No: IOWA CITY 6839-012 of: 1 Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 2 of 29 Hensch called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. CZ19-05 AND SUB19-16: Applicant: CJ Moyna & Sons Location: Fringe Area; West of Oak Crest Hill Rd SE, east of Highway 218 SE and south of F50 SE a. An application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a rezoning of approximately 32.19 acres of County Residential (R) to County Highway Commercial (CH) and approximately 32.87 acres from County Agriculture (A) to County Commercial (C) in unincorporated Johnson County. b. An application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a preliminary plat of the 218 Commercial Park subdivision, an 11 -lot commercial subdivision with five outlots in unincorporated Johnson County. Hensch noted since he is an employee of Johnson County he is recusing himself from this item and Vice Chair Parsons will oversee this agenda item. Heitner presented the staff report noting they received a revised rezoning and preliminary plat application from the applicants earlier this week. Heitner gave a brief overview of the changes from those revisions. With regards to the rezoning item, the main item he wanted to point out is parcel number three in the originally proposed rezoning was going to go from County Residential (R) to County Highway Commercial (CH) but the applicant has rescinded that request, so under the revised proposal it will remain County Residential (R). The major changes to the preliminary plat are in the original proposal there were 11 lots for immediate development. The revised proposal only includes five. The original proposed preliminary plat had one outlot for future development. The revised proposal is four. In terms of new streets that would be built with the subdivision there were originally three new streets proposed, the revised proposal just has one long street, an extension of Isaac Walden Road SE. Heitner showed an aerial view of the originally proposed subject area and then a view of the revised subject area and pointed out the large area north of Isaac Walton Road, or where Isaac Walton Road is to be extended is not included in the revised area. Next he showed a view of the revised subject area with the context of the current County zoning. The revised area is predominantly in County Agricultural zoning, with County Residential zoning to the north and that will remain in place. In the context of the City fringe area this is Area C which is fringe area outside the growth area. To the north, just a little bit north of Riverside Drive, there is a part of Area C that's inside of the City's growth area. Heitner next showed the revised rezoning exhibit and the revised plat. He noted the five lots for immediate development, numbered one through five are on the south side of the Isaac Walton Road extension. Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 3 of 29 Regarding the general background information on this case, the applicant applied for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the County in June 2019 to amend the County's future land use area for the subject area from agricultural to commercial. At the time, City staff provided comment on this potential plan amendment and expressed several concerns. Those concerns were detailed in an attachment that was in the Commission packet. Despite the City's concerns about the future land use map amendments the County Board of Supervisors still voted to amend the land use map from agricultural to commercial. With regards to background information on the rezoning, there are actually two parcels this applies to, parcel 1 is 32.87 acres going from County Agricultural to County Commercial, the second parcel is a small triangular parcel 0.09 acres from County Residential to County Commercial. With respect to the City's Comprehensive Plan on this rezoning, the fringe area dictates for Fringe Area C "that in the portions of Area C that are not within Iowa City's growth area and which are zoned for non-farm, development may occur in conformance with the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance and City Rural Design Standards until otherwise changed by amending this agreement this area shall be restricted to those uses consistent with a rural agricultural area, as indicated in the Johnson County Land Use Plan and has designated for a rural agricultural area in Chapter 816 Class A District of the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance as amended." Heitner next gave an overview of City staff's concerns with the rezoning. A County Commercial zoning designation in this area would open up the area for a large amount of by -right retail and service-oriented uses and this would generally conflict with the current nature of the Fringe Area Agreement which has intent to preserve the area as rural and agricultural. Lastly, the Fringe Area Agreement typically guides commercial development into the City so that areas with existing access to utilities and infrastructure are not passed over for gap or leapfrog development. Moving on to the preliminary plat Heitner reiterated the revised plat would have five lots for commercial development with four outlets for future development, two outlots for open space and one outlot that will be for future street infrastructure. As far as subdivision design, with the revised plat the only street that would be platted would be the extension of Isaac Walton Road to the west. Stormwater detention would be provided in Outlot B, in the southeast corner of the development. In terms of traffic implications, the proposed street infrastructure in the subdivision meets the City's Rural Design Standards. Transportation planning staff did note that overhead lights might be appropriate along Oak Crest Hill Road should the subdivision continue to develop. With respect to environmental sensitive areas the subdivision must meet County regulations pertaining to sensitive areas development. Outlots C and E at the far southern end of the subdivision are intended to be preservation outlets per the County's direction to preserve an existing stream corridor. With respect to water and sewer, a water system with a distribution line running off the north side of the proposed Isaac Walden Road extension will provide water to the five proposed lots for development. Individual septic systems are required to meet the Johnson County Board of Health rules and regulations and will be necessary on each developable lot. In summary, the applicant has submitted a revised rezoning request and preliminary plat, reducing the rezoning acreage from 65.15 acres to 32.96 acres. All of which would be rezone to County Commercial. The plat would reduce the number of lots from 11 to 5 for immediate development, with future development potentially taking place on 4 outlets. Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 4 of 29 The role of the Commission tonight would be to provide a recommendation to the City Council on the rezoning based on the Fringe Area Agreement. Ultimately with respect to the rezoning and the plat, the Johnson County Board of Supervisors will make the ultimate decision. As far as next steps, after the Commission provides a recommendation Council, Council will review and provide a recommendation to the Johnson County Planning Commission. Heitner stated there is a two-part staff recommendation as it pertains to the rezoning. Due to conflict with the existing Fringe Area Agreement staff is recommending denial of CZ19-05 an application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a rezoning of approximately 32.87 acres from County Agricultural (A) to County Commercial (C) and 0.09 acres from County Residential (R) to County Commercial (C) in unincorporated Johnson County. Staff did hold a meeting with Johnson County staff back in September 2019. City staff's position on the land use in this area has not changed since that meeting and therefore does not believe that a future conflict resolution meeting with the County is necessary. With respect to the preliminary plat because the preliminary plat meets the City's Rural Design Standards staff is recommending approval of SUB19-16, an application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a preliminary plat of the 218 Commercial Park subdivision, a 5 -lot commercial subdivision in unincorporated Johnson County. Baker asked for clarification on staff's recommendation that the Commission deny the rezoning request but approve the plat which is based upon a zoning which they are opposing. Heitner confirmed that was correct as in denying the rezoning request and approving the plat, the plat is just based on following the City's Rural Design Standards from the Fringe Area. Baker asked if the zoning that's in place now would not allow that development to occur. Heitner confirmed it is currently agricultural and would not allow the development. Russett noted staff is not recommending approval of the plat unless the County Board of Supervisors approves the rezoning, assuming they approve the rezoning staff would recommend approval of the plat. Signs asked if what was originally Outlot A on the northern half of this property is remaining County Residential is that what the new proposal states. Heitner confirmed that is correct. Signs noted he is confused by the drop from 11 lots to 5 lots and having all these outlots and wondered what if any advantage that change had in any decision making processes City staff or County staff might have. Heitner stated there wasn't a great deal of decision making that City staff made based on that change, their recommendation was going to be the same, regardless. It was their understanding that the Applicant in some discussions with County planning staff were encouraged to make that reduction in scale. Parsons opened the public hearing. Adam Kos (CJ Moyna & Sons) is representing the applicant along with Jon Manner from MMS Consultants who worked on the design for them. Kos gave a little background information on their company and maybe why they acquired the piece of property, they've had the property for a few years now, maybe four or five years. Initially they purchased the property with some ideas and the longer they had it and spoke with the City and started thinking about what can happen Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 5 of 29 down in that location, the number one objective was to find a home for themselves. CJ Moyna & Sons is a grading contractor located in Elkader, Iowa, and they do a lot of big, heavy highway civil type work such as all the grading at the 1-80/380 interchange. They have also done large grading jobs at the Park Place development in Tiffin, also in North Liberty and in Iowa City. They do a lot of work all across the state of Iowa. One of the things for them moving forward is that the work demographic is changing a little bit, a lot of the workforce that they have right now with a tremendous amount of experience and talent are getting a little bit older and with their vision and thought process moving forward to get into some urban areas like Iowa city it's a great place to put little satellite office, a place to stage and work on some equipment and then get into the community and look for some good employees. Currently they have about 250 -275 employees depending on the season, and with the type of work that they do there's an opportunity to make some pretty good wages. Kos noted he lives in Kalona, just south of Iowa City, his family's from here so that also played a role in wanting to be in Iowa City as well. On the east side of Oak Crest Hill Road there's also 80 acres that they are looking at, doing some preliminary studies and reviewing finances involved in creating a wetland on that side of the road as well. Kos stated part of the resubmittal that came in yesterday came from some conversations with both City staff and County staff, they heard some concerns, heard some excitement, and therefore ultimately trying to find the right path moving forward to make this work. They acknowledge that it's a fun and unique interchange and offers a lot for the City of Iowa City in the future. That being said they would like to get moving forward, especially with a building for themselves and maybe a few others. A blue-collar office park is what they are envisioning there for the 5 to 11 lots. Parsons stated that it seems for a commercial aspect it makes more sense to develop Outlot A before going south of Isaac Walton Road because at Outlot A they are closer to the action such as the interchange and South Riverside Drive. Parsons is curious on their thought process on why they decided to eliminate Outlot A from initial development. Kos replied not know what the short-term or long-term vision is for that interchange. That particular interchange probably holds a lot of value as a recreational potential in the future, there's a lot of public land there currently. Therefore, for them and what they want to do they see the least desirable land or the area that is probably least attractive is a little bit farther south. They would like to be tucked in by the tree line, low visibility, pretty setting, nice place to work, etc. They acknowledge that that northern piece is probably better suited for something else then what they are needing. Parsons asked if they are envisioning office space as opposed to retail or mix of both. Kos confirmed they were envisioning office space and not retail. Martin asked in the conversations with the County, because of what the agreement says, is this the route that the County said was needed to go first. Why wouldn't the County have had a conversation about rewriting that verbiage first. Russett replied they are currently working together on an update to the Fringe Area Agreement. Kos added the conversations have been very encouraging and the county is very excited to have a company like theirs come to the area. Bringing their business and footprint to Johnson County is exciting and the job potentials that they can bring to the table is exciting as well. Jon Marner (MMS Consultants) added that part of the reason the northern parcel was pulled out from the zoning and is listed as a future development is the recognition by CJ Moyna there are Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 6 of 29 conversations that need to be had between the County and City staff regarding the Fringe Area Agreement. By shifting the focus of the development to those four to five lots along the Isaac Walton Road extension allows CJ Moyna to come in, go ahead and get that development process started while those other issues can get worked out. It allows that area to start to develop and a little bit of progress to begin to move forward and hopefully that stimulates some conversation about what truly wants to be there. Dyer asked if they knew who the other occupants in the development will be. Kos replied they feel like it would be folks will be similar to them, what they are seeing right now in Tiffin is a small industrial park that's coming online that has some electricians there and other businesses similar. Kos noted that particular area and the proximity to the interstate is appealing. For them they have big equipment and trucks so for them to come rolling down through Highway 6 or through town and hit all the stoplights is probably not a good idea. The proximity to the interstate is a better location for them. They would continue to have their main facility up in Elkader but would like to have a location here where they could bring equipment in a heated shop to service. Parsons closed the public hearing. Parsons noted with staff making two separate recommendations he feels it makes sense to have two separate votes. Signs moved to recommend approval of CZ19-05 an application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a rezoning of approximately 32.19 acres of County Residential (R) to County Highway Commercial (CH) and approximately 32.87 acres from County Agricultural (A) to County Highway Commercial (CH) and 0.09 acres from County Residential (R) to County Commercial (CH) in unincorporated Johnson County. Martin seconded the motion. Parson stated with its position close to Highway 218 and South Riverside Drive he does see a path that there could be some commercial development in this area down the road, especially with its proximity to the fairgrounds, Colonial Lanes and other industrial activity. However, he thinks staff makes a compelling argument that based on what the Fringe Area Agreement says right now this wouldn't comply and so he would have to submit his vote for denial. Baker stated there's a cliche here about putting the cart before the horse that we are going to let the applicant proceed to do everything they could and then we'll work out the rules and regulations later. Martin agrees that's the way she understands it as well. Baker stated he has not heard a compelling case argument that the staff's concerns don't have more merit here in this case right now so he will be voting against this rezoning as well. Signs stated that based on the current Fringe Area Agreement staff's assessment is correct. Ultimately, however we vote it still is going to County and ultimately is their decision. His biggest concern is that we have a lot of vacant commercial industrial lots around the community and he personally doesn't see a need for more. Additionally because of this would be kind of bending the rules a little bit he doesn't find terribly compelling A vote was taken and the motion failed 0-6. Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 7 of 29 Parsons next moved to item B. Signs moved approval of SUB19-16, an application submitted by CJ Moyna & Sons for a preliminary plat of the 218 Commercial Park subdivision, an 11 -lot commercial subdivision with four outlots in unincorporated Johnson County. Dyer seconded the motion. Signs acknowledged it was odd to deny the rezoning but approve the plan but understand staff's approach on both of them. Also the County may approve the rezoning even with the recommended denial. Baker disagreed and said until the County approves the rezoning the plat is a moot point so why approve the plat before the County approves the zoning. Signs noted if the Commission doesn't approve either one then it's just totally dead. By denying the rezoning they are basically putting the decision in the County's lap and by approving the plat they are acknowledging if the County approves the rezoning then the plat does meet the Rural Area Development standards. Baker asked why it is necessary to approve the plat before the County does. Russett noted this is because the applications were submitted together as a rezoning and a preliminary plat so they are reviewed together. Baker asked if the Commission were to vote down the plat the applicant could come back in with a resubmission once the rezoning is in place. Russett said she was not sure. Some ordinances have clauses that do not allow for immediate resubmittals after an action has been taken and she is not familiar with the County's ordinance. Signs stated based on the logic of the staff's arguments about why the plat should be approved he would agree and will vote for it. A vote was taken and the motion passes 4-2 (Baker and Martin dissenting). Hensch rejoined the meeting. February 4, 2020 Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission 913 S. Dubuque Street Iowa City, IA 52240 r ZA Iry CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (319) 3S6-5009 FAX RE: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat of 218 Commercial Park Subdivision www.icgo`org Dear Members of the Commission: The Iowa City City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission have reviewed the request submitted by Adam Kos to rezone 32.96 acres of property located in unincorporated Johnson County south of Route 218 and Riverside Drive from County Agricultural (A) and County Residential (R) to County Commercial (C). The Fringe Area Agreement allows for City review of County rezoning cases for property within two miles of Iowa City. The subject property is located in Fringe Area C - Outside of Iowa City's Growth Area. For property located in this area, the Fringe Area Agreement states that land uses shall be restricted to those uses consistent with a Rural/Agricultural area as indicated in the Johnson County Land Use Plan, and as designated for a Rural/Agriculture area in Chapter 8:1.6 Class A District of the Johnson County Unified Development Ordinance, as amended. According to Johnson County's Land Use Plan, agricultural uses include agriculture with "very limited residential development." However, the Johnson County Board of Supervisors recently approved a request for a Future Land Use Map amendment of the subject property from Agricultural to Commercial. City staff provided an advisory position expressing concerns over this map amendment. City staff is primarily concerned with the wide variety of commercial land uses a rezoning to a County Commercial zoning designation presents, which violates the intent of the current Fringe Area Agreement. At its January 16th meeting, the Iowa City Planning & Zoning Commission recommend denial of the rezoning application, but recommended approval of the preliminary plat. The City does not believe that a future conflict resolution committee meeting with Johnson County on this rezoning is necessary, since the City's concerns over the future land use of the subject property have not changed since the meeting with the County on September 23, 2019. The preliminary plat was recommended for approval, due to its conformance with the City's Rural Design Standards, that are outlined in the Fringe Area Agreement. The City Council concurs with the Commission, and recommends that this rezoning from County Agricultural (A) and County Residential (R) to County Commercial (C) be denied, but that the preliminary plat for the 218 Commercial Park Subdivision be approved. Thank you for your consideration of our comments on this application. Sincerely, Bruce Teague Mayor, City of Iowa City 1t 10 Prepared by: Ray Hehner, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5238 (SUB18-00019) Resolution No. 20-27 Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat Of 218 Commercial Park subdivision, a 32.96 -acre, five lot commercial subdivision with nine outlots located in unincorporated Johnson County south of Route 218 and Riverside Drive (SUB19-16) Whereas, the owner, CJ Moyna & Sons, filed with the City Clerk the preliminary plat of 218 Commercial Park Subdivision, located in unincorporated Johnson County, Iowa; and Whereas, the Department of Neighborhood and Development Services and the Public Works Department examined the preliminary plat and recommended approval; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission examined the preliminary plat and, after due deliberation, recommended acceptance and approval of the plat, contingent upon County approval of the property's rezoning to County Commercial (C) zoning designation; and Whereas, the preliminary plat conforms with all of the requirements of the City Ordinances of the City Of Iowa City, Iowa, and with the requirements outlined in the Fringe Area "C" as stated in the City's Iowa CitylJohnson County Fringe Area Agreement. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The preliminary plat of 218 Commercial Park Subdivision, located in unincorporated Johnson County, Iowa, is hereby approved contingent upon County approval of the property's rezoning to County Commercial (C) zoning designation. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa are hereby authorized and directed to certify this resolution, upon approval by the City Attorney, to execute all legal documents relating to said subdivision, and to certify a copy of this resolution, which shall be affixed to the final plat after passage and approval by law. The City Clerk shall certify and send plat and supporting documents to the office of Planning and Zoning of Johnson County, Iowa. All recording expense is the responsibility of the owner/subdivider. Passed and approved this 4th day of _ February —,20 20 Ma /� Approved by Attest: —�,� ' °e4? LjlY�f�erz CI rn Clerk City Attoey's Office It was moved by trims and seconded by 'Thomas the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Resolution No. 20-27 Page 2 Ayes: Nays: Absent: Teague Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Thomas Weiner STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: 1 r I C04;qui h CITY OF lOVVA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (3I9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Item 11.b.: 218 Commercial Park— Preliminary Plat SUB19-16 County Subdivision A resolution approving the Preliminary Plat of 218 Commercial Park Subdivision, a 32.96 acre, five Lot commercial subdivision with nine Outlots located in unincorporated Johnson County south of Route 218 and Riverside Drive. Background Information- Preliminary Plat Platting would create five (5) lots for commercial development. Four (4) Lots for future development. Two (2) Outlots for open space. One (1) Outlot for future streets. I � 2 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2eMMES LA RK JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA �-R= Proposed street infrastructure meets the City's Rural Design Standards contained in the existing Fringe Area Agreement. Transportation planning staff noted that overhead lights might be appropriate along Oak Crest Hill Road, should the subdivision continue to develop. Subdivision must meet County regulations pertaining to sensitive areas development. Outlots "C" and "E", at the far southern end of the subdivision, will be converted to preservation Outlots, per the County's Direction, to preserve the existing stream corridor. Well water system with a distribution line running off the north side of the proposed Izaak Walton Road extension will provide water to the five proposed lots for development. Individual septic systems that are required to meet Johnson County Board of Health Rules and Regulations will be utilized on each developable lot. Johnson County Future Land Use Plan Update (September 2019) Johnson County Rezoning from County A and R to County C -City Council recommendation to Johnson County Planning and Zoning Commission (pending) Preliminary Plat-P&Z recommendation (January 2020) City Council approval Final Plat -City Council approva Planning &Zoning Commission Recommendation — PreliminaryPlat The Planning & Zoning Commission recommends denial of rezoning case CZ19-05 and approval of subdivision case SUB19-16, for approximately 32.96 acres of property located in unincorporated Johnson County south of Route 218 and Riverside Drive. STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r rrM as � h CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg Item Number: 11.c. CITY OE IOWA CITY www.icgov.org February 4, 2020 Resolution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street in the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown Zone. (DRC19-04) /_1AG_Ta:l►vi1=1ZIII IR1 Description Memo to City Manager PZ Staff Memo PZ Staff Memo -Attach 1 - Rezoning Ord and CZA PZ Staff Memo -Attach 2a - West Bldg PZ Staff Memo -Attach 2b - East Bldg PZ Staff Memo -Attach 3 - Management Plan PZ Prelim Minutes Resolution � r CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CIN OF LITERATURE Date: January 27, 2020 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner on behalf of the Form -Based Code Committee Re: Level II Design Review — 12 E. Court Street On January 16, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the height bonus and development rights transfers requested for the property at 12 E. Court Street. This P&Z review and recommendation was required by the CZA encumbering this property. Based on the information provided by the applicant, the Staff Form -Based Code Committee found that the proposal met the requirements of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. Although it meets the technical requirements of the code, awarding the bonus height is at the sole discretion of the City Council. Staff recommends approving the application and security plan, with the following modifications and details: 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re -design of the Capital Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. Upon submittal of a site plan review application, Owner shall provide details to confirm compliance with the Security Plan, including, but not limited to, information demonstrating that video surveillance covers all ingress and egress points and the publicly -accessible exterior common areas with adequate lighting, protocols for PD access, security system repair, and security staff training. Additional detail shall also be provided demonstrating that the academic amenity space will be adequately furnished and equipped in a manner that is clearly intended to support the academic endeavors of the residents. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Owner shall revise the Security Plan to require a minimum of 3 24-7 uniformed security (non -maintenance) personnel is provided on-site and provide a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby in both buildings 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. Council approval shall be required if the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials. 8. The landscaping and hardscaping on the private property and within the Capitol Street and Court Street rights-of-way shall be maintained by owner in a manner consistent with the submitted landscape plans, or as otherwise allowed and approved by the City Forester. The Commission recommended approval of the height bonus request by a vote of 5-2 (Dyer and Townsend in the negative) subject to the following: Re -design of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review and approval by the City Engineer, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street; January 30, 2020 Page 2 2. Revisions to the Security Plan to include details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc.; 3. The provision of additional detail on the academic amenity space; 4 The bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non- opaque fencing; 5. Council approval of substantive deviations from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials The Commission did not support staff's recommendation to remove the skywalk and the balconies. The Commission generally felt that the skywalk would provide a safe route for students between the buildings and also provide a warmer route during cold days. The Commission also supported the balconies because they provide air and access to the outdoor and are often a sought-after amenity. Staff continues to recommend removal of the balconies and skywalk. Staff is concerned that the skywalk across Capital Street could block an important viewshed of the Old Capital. In addition, it could potentially divert activity away from the street -level, and would not provide a public benefit. In terms of the balconies, staff does not support the proposed balconies on a student housing project of this scale. The applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies; however, staff is concerned with the visual appearance of fully screened balconies, especially with the metal and wiring solutions that have been presented. Staff also has concerns related to noise and nuisances, even with the fully screened balconies. t =�, _4 CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: January 16, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, on behalf of the Staff Form -Based Code Committee Re: Level I I Design Review — 12 E. Court Street Introduction Staff received a design review application last year, which includes a height bonus request, for the property at 12 E. Court Street. On January 16, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review these plans and make a recommendation to the City Council. This memo includes the project background, outlines the height bonus request, generally describes the project, and outlines the specific criteria used in the review. Although the Form - Based Code Committee has determined that the project meets the requirements of the form - based code, this is a discretionary process and staff has identified some concerns. The main concerns are as follows: • The applicant has proposed a skywalk between the two proposed buildings that extends across the proposed Capital Street extension. The skywalk is not supported by staff. • The proposed buildings include fully screened balconies. Although the screens are included for safety reasons, staff is concerned that the fully screened balconies will detract from the visual appearance of the buildings and does not support the balconies. • The plans include a proposed design for the Capital Street extension, which staff does not support. Staff recommends that the proposed right-of-way be redesigned to City specifications. Background In April 2018, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a rezoning of approximately 3.41 acres of land located at 12 E. Court Street from the High Density Multi - Family Residential (RM -44) zone to the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown (RFC -SD) zone subject to conditions related to the dedication of right-of-way along Capital Street, streetscape improvements, and additional review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In September 2018, the City Council adopted the rezoning subject to conditions related to the following [Attachment 1]: 1. Dedication of the Capital Street right-of-way; 2. Obtain approval of the exterior design elevations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. If Level II design review is required for bonus height, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council; 3. Build the Capital Street right-of-way to City specifications; 4. Streetscape improvements to enhance the pedestrian environment; 5. Satisfaction of the affordable housing requirements; 6. Compliance with the building footprints shown for this area in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan; 7. Development of a landscaped interior courtyard on the eastside of the project site; 8. Approval by the City Manager of the owner's architect team; and 9. If requesting bonus height, that the project "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". January 9, 2020 Page 2 Projects located in Riverfront Crossings zoning districts are subject to design review by the staff Form -Based Code Committee. The Form -Based Code Committee's responsibility is ensuring that the plans comply with the form -based regulations. Staff received a complete application for design review in July 2019, which included a request for a height bonus. This request not only requires review by staff, but also by the Planning and Zoning Commission due to the rezoning condition, and the City Council. Bonus Height Request The applicant has requested seven stories of bonus height for two proposed 15 story, mixed - used buildings. The base maximum height in the RFC -SD zone is eight stories, but the maximum bonus height allowed is 15 stories through the discretionary design review process. The building height bonus provisions in the form -based code for Riverfront Crossings create an incentive for developers to incorporate features that provide a public benefit or that further important goals and objectives of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Requests for bonus height are reviewed by the Form -Based Code Committee through the Design Review process. Up to two stories of bonus height may be approved administratively by staff. Height bonus requests above two stories or transfer of development right requests (e.g. public right-of-way) must be approved by City Council through the Level II design review process. As is shown in Table 1, the applicant is requesting seven stories of bonus height for both the west and east buildings by meeting the approval criteria for public right-of-way height transfers, historic preservation height transfers, and bonus height for student housing as set forth in 14- 2G -7G of the zoning code. Table 1. Summa of Bonus Hei ht Request West Building East Building Request Type Bonus Height Request Type Bonus Height Public Right -of -Way Floors 9-14 Public Right -of -Way Floors 9-14 Height Transfer Height Transfer Historic Preservation Floors 14-15 Historic Preservation n/a Height Transfer Hei ht Transfer Student Housing Floor 15 Student Housing Floor 15 In addition to the specific approval criteria, the code also requires that that all proposals must demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. See Attachment 2 for the applicant's submission to the Form -Based Code Committee, which includes building elevations and renderings, site plan, landscaping plans, and floor plans. Attachment 3 includes additional perspectives provided by the applicant General Description of the Project The two buildings are proposed on a sloping site between Burlington and Court Streets along the proposed extension of Capital Street west of the Voxman Music Building. See Figure 1. January 9, 2020 Page 3 Figure 1. Location of Proposed Project T EE V " 1 F ■ a - �� • BURLING10N '~ • r .E -■ ■ ■k ■ •tic � ' 7� 1 ��+ COJfiI � • • + � F 04._m � 11. West Building The west building is proposed west of the Capital Street extension. The proposed 15 -story building will include 492 dwelling units and 3 levels of underground parking. The first floor (and a portion of the basement level) of the building will include non-residential uses along Burlington Street, Capital Street, and Court Street, as well as some residential units that face the main courtyard area and alley. The non-residential uses include a proposed office use along Court Street, a retail use at the intersection of Burlington and Capital Streets and academic amenity space along Capital Street. The applicant has described the academic spaces as including study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi. In terms of recreational amenities, the plans show a half basketball court, a track, a jacuzzi area, and an outdoor pool deck along Burlington Street. Trash and recycling areas are provided on each floor and small community study areas (approximately 220 square feet) are provided on floors 4-15. The plans also show that the on- site parking and open space requirements have been met. Specifically, the code requires 239 vehicle parking spaces and 241 are proposed. The plans also include spaces for scooter and bicycle parking. In terms of open space, the plans show that 15,037 square feet of open space will be provided through the provision of one large, landscaped, public courtyard; two smaller, landscaped, public forecourts, and two smaller, private courtyards. The main courtyard space extends from Capital Street west to the alley behind the building. It is 48 feet wide and is open for the first three stories of the building. See Figures 2 and 3 for more information on the proposed open space areas. Two additional private courtyard spaces are provided along the alley side of the building and two, public forecourt spaces open up to Capital Street. Table 2 provides a summary of the west building. January 9, 2020 Page 4 Figure 2. Overview of Open Space Areas { -- Blue areas indicate public open space and green areas indicate private open space. Figure 3. East Perspective of the West Building Public Courtyard January 9, 2020 Page 5 Table 2. West Building Summary Stories Proposed 15 Required/Allowed 8 max base height 15 max bonus height Dwelling Units 492 n/a Bedrooms 953 n/a Vehicle Parking 241 239 Bicycle Parking 278 271 Open Space 15,037 sq ft 9,530 sq ft Office 3,649 sq ft n/a Retail 1,699 sq ft n/a Flex Space non-residential 1,473 sq ft n/a Recreational Amenities 16,996 sq ft n/a Academic Amenities 9,211 sq ft n/a East Building The east building is proposed east of the Capital Street extension. The proposed 15 -story building will include 426 dwelling units and 3 levels of underground parking. The first floor of the building will include non-residential uses along Burlington Street, Capital Street, and Court Street. This includes a proposed office space at the corner of Burlington and Capital Streets, academic spaces along Capital Street, and a retail use at the Capital and Court Street intersection. The applicant has described the academic spaces as including study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi. No recreational spaces are provided within the east building; however, it includes a 3,623 square foot restaurant on the 15th floor. The plans demonstrate that the requirements related to on-site parking and open space are met. The code requires 205 vehicle parking spaces and the plans show 208 vehicle spaces, as well as parking for scooters and bicycles. Similar to the west building, the plans show that public and private open space requirements will be met through landscaped forecourts and courtyards. Specifically, the main public courtyard area extends from Capital Street east to the alley and two other smaller, public forecourt spaces open up to Capital Street. See Figure 2, above, for more detail on the proposed open space areas. Table 3 provides a summary of the east building. Table 3. East Building Summary Stories Proposed 15 Required/Allowed 8 max base height 15 max bonus height Dwelling Units 426 n/a Bedrooms 820 n/a Vehicle Parking 208 205 Bicycle Parking 246 244 Open Space 10,332 sq ft 8,200 sq ft Office 9,134 sq ft n/a Retail 1,473 sq ft n/a Restaurant 3,623 sq ft n/a Academic Amenities 9,824 sq ft n/a Materials The applicant has proposed a variety of materials for both buildings, including metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete. Along the first floor of Capital Street the applicant has proposed an artistic component in the form of a graphic panel behind metal screens near building entrances. The renderings show the metal screen with plantings growing up them and the lighted graphic panels behind the screens. See Figure 4. January 9, 2020 Page 6 Figure 4. Metal Panels with Graphic Panels along Capital Street In addition, the applicant has proposed balconies. Due to safety concerns with balconies incorporated into such a large student housing project, the applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies with a perforated panel and a metal screen. The applicant has provided staff with material samples, which staff will bring to the Commission's meeting. Skywalk The applicant has proposed a connection between the east and west buildings via a skywalk, which is located at the fourth floor between the open courtyard area and Burlington Street. Capital Street Right -of -Way The applicant's plans also show the proposed public right-of-way for Capital Street. The plans show a 100 -foot right-of-way, which includes 12.5 -foot walkways on both sides of Capital Street, two 12.5 -foot travel lanes and angled parking. The plans also show planter boxes along both sides of Capital Street and a pedestrian crosswalk aligned with the main courtyards of each building. Saecific Approval Criteria Public Right -of -Way Transfer To qualify for bonus height for a public right-of-way height transfer the applicant must dedicate land (the sending site) that is needed in order to construct or improve rights-of-way necessary to realize the vision of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. In this case, the applicant has agreed to dedicate public right-of-way to re -open Capital Street between Burlington and Court Streets. The transfer of development rights request must be equal to the area of the right-of-way to be dedicated multiplied by the base maximum height allowed. Staff Findings: The applicant has agreed to dedicate public right-of-way that will result in the re- opening of Capital Street per the executed conditional zoning agreement. Based on the amount of right-of-way that will be dedicated the applicant has enough square footage from the sending site (i.e. the proposed ROW) to transfer that development potential to the proposed buildings. In total, the applicant has requested to transfer 304,000 square feet of the ROW development potential to the two buildings. The extension of Capital Street is also envisioned in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and also identified as a primary street on the regulating plan that was adopted as part of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. January 9, 2020 Page 7 That said, staff does not support the proposed design of the Capital Street right-of-way. Specifically, the applicant has proposed angled parking, which staff recommends be changed to parallel parking. Staff would also like to see the width of the travel lanes reduced. The incorporation of parallel parking will ensure consistency with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Reducing the width of the travel lanes and incorporating parallel parking will ensure consistency with the City's recent street reconstruction projects, like Washington Street in downtown. Furthermore, the conditional zoning agreement requires that the applicant build the Capital Street right-of-way to specifications approved by the City Engineer. The current design does not align with the City's expectations. Lastly, staff does not support the proposed skywalk across Capital Street that connects the two buildings. Staff is concerned that it could block views of the Old Capital and potentially divert activity away from the street -level. Historic Preservation Transfer To qualify for bonus height for a historic preservation height transfer the applicant must transfer development potential from an Iowa City historic landmark to a receiving site. The transfer of development rights request must be equal to the acreage of the sending site multiplied by the base maximum height allowed. Staff Findings: The applicant previously supported the designation of the Tate Arms building as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. In 2015, the City Council approved the transfer of a portion of the development potential of the sending site (i.e. Tate Arms) to an adjacent property. As part of this previous agreement, the applicant rehabilitated the Tate Arms building. The current request is to transfer the remaining potential of the Tate Arms building, 27,400 square feet, to 12 E. Court Street. Student Housing Up to 5 floors of additional building height may be granted for projects that are ideally located and designed to provide a high-quality living environment for college students. Student housing height bonus requests must also meet the following criteria: Location Criteria: 1. Projects must be located on land that is within the University Subdistrict, South Downtown Subdistrict, or the West Riverfront Subdistrict; and 2. Is within one thousand feet (1,000') walking distance along public rights-of-way from the University of Iowa campus. Management, Design And Amenity Criteria: 1. An enforceable plan for on site management and security must be submitted to and approved by the City; 2. For projects with 200 or more bedrooms, professional 24 hour on site management and security must be provided. A professionally staffed management office/reception desk must be provided in the entrance lobby of the building; 3. Interior and exterior usable shared open space must be provided with amenities that create a high quality living environment for students. The management plan must include adequate provisions for management, maintenance, and security of such spaces; 4. A secure bicycle parking/storage area shall be provided and maintained within the building or parking garage; 5. The owner shall maintain a valid rental permit and comply with all applicable City codes; 6. The City reserves the right to inspect the property to verify compliance with these provisions. January 9, 2020 Page 8 Staff Findings: The project meets the location criteria. It is located within the South Downtown subdistrict, right across the street from the University of Iowa Campus. As for the management plan, the applicant has submitted a management plan that has been reviewed by the City, including the Police Department [Attachment 4]. The Police Department is comfortable with the direction provided by the applicant to date; however, there are several details to work out. These details include confirmation of camera coverage at points of egress, ingress, common areas, public areas, and businesses; exact protocols for the Police Department accessing video; protocols for timely repairs to the video systems; as well as staffing requirements. In terms of staffing, staff recommends at least three security personnel providing security 24/7. Staff recommends a final administrative review and approval of the management plan, which must include these details, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Although the plans show the provision of academic amenity space in both the west and east buildings, the plans lack detail on how this amenity space creates a high-quality living environment for students. Staff recommends that the applicant provide more justification on the amenity spaces. More specifically, is the amount and type of amenity spaces proposed adequate based on today's student's needs and the size of the project? In addition, staff does not support the proposed balconies on a student housing project of this scale. The applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies; however, staff is concerned with the visual appearance of fully screened balconies, especially with the metal and wiring solutions that have been presented. The fully enclosed balconies could detract from the higher quality components of the building and still allow for minor nuisances (e.g. noise, debris). The plans demonstrate compliance with the number of required on-site bicycle parking. The bicycle parking provided within the parking garage is secured with a fence enclosure around the bike parking. Staff recommends that this fencing be chain-link or some other non-opaque material for safety reasons. The City will require and ensure that the applicant obtain a rental permit prior to occupancy. Rezoning Conditions In addition to reviewing the project against the bonus height criteria, staff also reviewed the project against the following rezoning conditions: • Development of the subject property must substantially conform to the building footprints shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (page 61). Any significant deviation in the building footprint, as reasonably determined by the City, must be approved by the City Council in a Level II design review process. Staff Findings: Figure 5 shows the image referenced in this rezoning condition. The master plan shows four U-shaped buildings along the Capital Street extension. Staff determined that this condition has been met. Figure 6 shows the comparison of the master plan footprints with the proposed footprints provided in the development plans. Combining the west and east buildings, the plans show 139 linear feet more along the exterior building walls (an increase of 5%) and 2,977 more square feet (an increase of 4.8%). January 9, 2020 Page 9 Figure 5. Image from Page 61 of the Plan, Looking South r ...........`; Figure 6 also helps illustrate that the master plan contemplated four buildings, while the proposal includes two buildings. The proposed plans include a connection at the fourth floor, which results in two buildings, but allows for the public courtyards to extend to the western and eastern edges of the property. Figure 7 shows the proposed connection at the fourth floor above the public courtyard area. See also Figure 3 for the rendering showing the courtyard, which includes the proposed landscaping, amenities, and artistic components. Figure 6. Footprint Comparison — Master Plan v. Proposed Plan M0._TER PLAN PROPOSED FOOTPRINTS FOOTPRINT January 9, 2020 Page 10 • Development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Access to the University of Iowa's Voxman Music Building from the interior courtyard may be restricted or limited for safety reasons if deemed appropriate by the City Council in a Level II design review process. Staff Findings: Staff determined that this condition has also been met. The plans for the east building show an interior courtyard that extends and is open from Capital Street to the alley between the east building and the Voxman Music Building. • In accordance with the Riverfront Crossing Form -Based Code, any request for bonus height shall "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". Staff Findings: The buildings will be constructed of steel and concrete. The proposed materials include metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete, which are approval materials per the form -based code. The buildings will have extensive window and door openings, which meet the fenestration requirements of the form -based code. Despite the sloping nature of the site, all entrances from Burlington, Clinton, and Court Streets are designed at -grade. The window and door openings, as well as the at -grade entrances help create a more walkable and inviting environment. To break up the fagade, the buildings are stepped back along Burlington, Court, and Capital Streets. Along Capital Street, the building stepbacks are deeper at the southern end and narrow toward Burlington Street. The stepbacks meet the requirement of at least a 10 -foot stepback above the fifth story. In addition, the forecourt and courtyard openings, in combination with the vertical and horizontal articulation help to create a visually appealing fagade. The open spaces along Capital Street also help to keep visual interest. These spaces are open to the public and provide open seating areas and are fully landscaped. The project is located on a sloping site between the Voxman Music Building and a recent 8 -story residential project at 316 E. Madison Street. To the south of the project site is the Johnson County Courthouse. Although there are no other buildings of this scale in the immediate vicinity, the City Council adopted the form - based code to help incentivize redevelopment in Riverfront Crossing by allowing up to 15 stories through a discretionary process. January 9, 2020 Page 11 Role of the Commission Typically, the Planning and Zoning Commission is not involved in the design review process. However, since a Level II design review is required, the adopted conditional zoning agreement requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council. Recommendation Based on the information provided by the applicant, as described above, the Staff Form -Based Code Committee finds that the proposal meets the requirements of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. Although it meets the technical requirements of the code, awarding the bonus height is at the sole discretion of the City Council. Furthermore, staff recommends the following modifications and details: 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re -design of the Capital Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. An additional administrative review of the management plan that includes details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc. prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional detail and justification on the academic amenity space. 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. If the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, these changes must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. An example of a substantive change is a change to exterior building materials. Attachments: 1. Conditional Zoning Agreement 2. Applicant's Submittal to the Form -Based Code Committee 3. Additional Perspective Provided by the Applicant 4. Applicant's Management Plan Prepared by: Sylvia Bochner, Planning Intem, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, [A 52240; 319-356-5240 (REZ18-00014) Ordinance No. 18-4765 An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 3.41 acres from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) zone to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC -SD) zone located at 12 E. Court Street. (REZ18-00014) Whereas, the applicant, 100-500 LLC, has requested a rezoning of property located at 12 E. Court Street from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC -SD); and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that this property is appropriate for redevelopment of high density multifamily housing that contributes to a pedestrian friendly streetscape; and Whereas, the requested rezoning will result in a significant increase in residential density, necessitating street improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and Whereas, the large scale of the development (equivalent to a square block) necessitates careful consideration of design, and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the reviewed the proposed rezoning and determined that it complies with the Comprehensive Plan provided that it meets conditions addressing the need for compliance with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan including dedication of right of way and construction of Capitol Street; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner and applicant has agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of High Density Multifamily Residential (RM44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC -SD): ALL OF LOT 5, ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND BLOCK 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. Section II. Zoning Map. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section III. Conditional Zon[ng Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 18--4765 Page 2 Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this 4th day of _ September , 2018. MAVOR 100, ATTEST: CITY CLERK tpZved City Attorneys Office Ordinance No. 18-4765 Page 3 It was moved by Mims and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Thomas that the AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Vacant — Botchway seat x Cole x Mires x Salih x Taylor x Thomas x Throgmorton First Consideration 08/21/2018 Voteforpassage: AYES: Cole, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas, Throgmorton. NAYS: None. ABSENT": Vacant-Botchway seat. Second Consideration ------- Vote for passage: Date published 09/13/2018 Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. Prepared by: Sylvia Bochner, Planning Intem, 490 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5240 (REZ18-00014) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and 100-500, L.L.C. (hereinafter "Owner'). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 3.41 acres of property located at 12 E. Court Street; and Whereas, the Owner has requested the rezoning of said property from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC - SD); and Whereas, the requested rezoning will result in a significant increase in residential density, necessitating street improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and Whereas, the large scale of the development (equivalent to a square block) necessitates careful consideration of design, and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding compliance with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, including dedication of right of way and the construction of Capitol Street and streetscape enhancements on Burlington Street, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner acknowledges that certain conditions and restrictions are reasonable to ensure the development of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the need for dedication of right of way and construction of Capitol Street and streetscape improvements on Burlington Street; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows. 1. 100-500 LLC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as ALL OF LOT 5, ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND BLOCK 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT ppdadmfagVrezl8-000014 cza pentacrestgardens81618.doc THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. 2. The Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agrees that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the zoning chapter, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any new development of the subject property, Owner shall; i. Submit and obtain the City's Manager's written approval of a phasing plan for the development. The plan shall include dates by which Owner shall dedicate right of way to the City of sufficient width, as determined by the City, to facilitate the reestablishment of Capitol Street. In no event shall dedication of the Capitol Street Right of Way occur more than 36 months after issuance of the initial building permit, and in no event shall completion of the Capitol Street improvements occur more than 24 months after dedication of the right of way. ii. Obtain approval of the exterior design elevations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. If Level ll design review is required for bonus height, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council. b. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in said phasing plan or an amendment thereto, Owner shall dedicate the Capitol Street Right of Way to the City and build the Capitol Street right-of-way to specifications approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the subject property. c. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the subject property, Owner shall install streetscape improvements to enhance the pedestrian environment on Burlington Street and Court Street, as described in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. d. Owner shall satisfy the affordable housing obligations imposed pursuant to Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8 through the provision of on-site owner -occupied dwelling units, on-site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on-site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the City in an affordable housing agreement entered into prior to issuance of a building permit for development of any portion of the above-described property. e. Development of the subject property must substantially conform to the building footprints shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (page 61). Any significant deviation in the building footprint, as reasonably determined by the City, must be approved by the City Council in a Level II design review process. f. Development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Access to the University of Iowa's Voxman Music Building from the interior courtyard may be restricted or limited for safety reasons if deemed appropriate by the City Council in a level II design review process. ppdadnVa9Vrez18-000014 cze pentacrest gardens81618.dx 2 g. The owner's architect team must have demonstrated experience to the City's reasonable satisfaction with both: 1) high-quality urban design; and, 2) large-scale student housing and/or residence halls (exterior and interior). The owner shall submit the qualifications of the architect team to the City Manager prior to the design review process to ensure this condition is met. The City Manager must confirm compliance with this condition in writing prior to the commencement of the design review process. h. In accordance with the Riverfront Crossing Form -Based Code, any request for bonus height shall "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". 4. The Owner and City acknowledge that the conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2017), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. The Owner and City acknowledge that in the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all redevelopment will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. The parties acknowledge that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. 7. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. 8. The Owner acknowledges that nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner or Applicant from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 9. The parties agree that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this 4th day of September , 2018. City of Iowa City G. JO Throgmorton, gayor Attest: ppdadmlagt1reZ18-000014 = pentatrestgardensB1618.doc 3 By: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Approved by: �' �Q -F-1 City Attorney's Office City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: STATE OF IOWA ) ) SS: JOHNSON COUNTY } By: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Ll , 20415 by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public i nd for the StatLy of Iowa MAYMy Fx (Stamp or Seal) co 7 28 Title (and Rank) e SAecr + 100-500, L.L.C. Acknowledgment: State of �L-� County of 10, 7 r1 This record was acknowledged before me on d 1 (Date) by Fames f�.Cr'�r-1c (Name{s) of indivi uai( ) as CO «;r -)P r- (type of authority, such as member) of 100-500, L.L.C. Not -Ary Public in and Ft (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: ppdadmfagVrez1B-000014 ma pentacrostgardens81898.dac 4 State of Iowa commtssim MY cWgn! VICINITY MAP KEY PLAN BURLINGTON STREET COURT STREET 12 EAST IOWA CITY, IOWA WEST BUILDING INDEX OF DRAWINGS PRESENTATION G001W TITLE SHEET AND WING SHEET 002W SITE DIAGRAMMING L001W LANDSCA T L002WLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN C001W CIVIL PLAN A10OW LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101W UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A102W SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A103W FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A201W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A205W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A206W ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN CODE REVIEW General Information Residential Unit Count Motor Vehicle Parking Count Required Provided Bike Parking Count Required Provided Building Amenity Car Stalls 241 (3 car stal s wil be designe as 69 scooter stalls) 1 stall for f 0 resides, 1/2 stall for remaining residential units 50 + (1/2 *442t- 271 Interior q228 Exterior 50 Interior Academic 9,211 sq.ft Interior Recreation 16,215 sq.ft. Exterior 16,996 sq.ft 42,422 sq.ft Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" - " 4'-0" +/-) at Ca itol Street Rear 5'-0" - Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Fie with subordinate Forecourt Glazing between 2 and 10 Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Proposed 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedr Required U953s ft. per bedroom q.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt W11,796sq.ft. Forecourt W2 ,,356sq.ft. Courtyard W1 L2,275sq.ft. 660sq.ft. Courtyard W2 Courtyard W3 950 sq.ft.037 s .ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provided 25%(min) See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed at sending site) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Transfer 153,936 sq.ft. transfered to east building 150,064 sq.ft. transfered to west building 304,000 sq.ft. Floor Its Beds Efficiency 87 87 1 -Bed 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 2 -Bed 163 326 3 -Bed 149 30% 447 Total 49 53 14 492 10,954 sq.ft. Car Stalls 241 (3 car stal s wil be designe as 69 scooter stalls) 1 stall for f 0 resides, 1/2 stall for remaining residential units 50 + (1/2 *442t- 271 Interior q228 Exterior 50 Interior Academic 9,211 sq.ft Interior Recreation 16,215 sq.ft. Exterior 16,996 sq.ft 42,422 sq.ft Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" - " 4'-0" +/-) at Ca itol Street Rear 5'-0" - Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Fie with subordinate Forecourt Glazing between 2 and 10 Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Proposed 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedr Required U953s ft. per bedroom q.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt W11,796sq.ft. Forecourt W2 ,,356sq.ft. Courtyard W1 L2,275sq.ft. 660sq.ft. Courtyard W2 Courtyard W3 950 sq.ft.037 s .ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provided 25%(min) See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed at sending site) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Transfer 153,936 sq.ft. transfered to east building 150,064 sq.ft. transfered to west building 304,000 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 09 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 10 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 11 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 12 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 13 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 14 27,822 sq.ft. 10,954 sq.ft. 128,280 sq.ft. 150,064 sq.ft. Historic Preservation Height Transfer RITLAND KUIPER Tate Arms House landmark status = 34,800 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area 7,400 sq.ft. previously used 27,400 sq.ft. transfered to west building 34,800 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 14 27,822 sq.ft. 16,868 sq.ft. 15 27,822 sq.ft. 10,532 sq.ft. 27,400 sq.ft Student Housing Requesting 0.62 floors or 17,290 sq.ft. of height bonus. Floor Floor Area Bonus Area 15 27,822 sq.ft. 17,290 sq.ft. ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 1*11L DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING SHEET SHEET NUMBER G001W H i Its"' • L L 0 f �S D� iL L L HARRISON ST. r�V 4 s 40 �' • * T - }XL j - J q • o T16 • F 4 • a i a • a • # 0C1r. I1�rk Q" 0 WEST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,468 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 33,190 SQ. FT. F F EAST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,328 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,340 SQ. FT. MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS WEST BUILDING 0 55 45' Q TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,574 LINEAR FT. (7.2% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 36,399 SQ. FT. (9.6% OVER MASTER PLAN) F i M 0 i w T� "! � moi• � F EAST BUILDING TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,361 LINEAR FT. (2.5% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,108 SQ. FT. (1% UNDER MASTER PLAN) H • DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 • PROPOSED FOOTPRINT NARRATIVE THESE DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO, AND IMPROVES UPON, THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS SHOWN IN THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN. KEY A SOUTH DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PLAN DIAGRAM FROM PAGE 61 OF THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN WITH THE 12 EAST COURT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. B ENLARGED VIEW OF THE SOUTH DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PLAN DIAGRAM FROM PAGE 61 OF THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN WITH THE 12 EAST COURT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. C GRAY SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING THE SHAPE AND SIZE OF THE BUILDINGS IN THE MASTER PLAN. D GRAY SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING THE LOWER FLOORS 1-3 OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. E DASHED OUTLINE OF THE UPPER FLOORS 4-15 OF THE EAST AND WEST BUILDINGS. F BOLD OUTLINE ILLUSTRATING THE LENGTH OF BUILDING FACADES THAT DIRECTLY FRONT CAPITOL STREET. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DECREASES THE LENGTH OF BUILDING FACADES THAT DIRECTLY FRONTS CAPITOL STREET AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. G. GREEN SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING EXTERIOR COURTYARDS. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF EXTERIOR OPEN SPACE ALONG CAPITOL STREET AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. H RED DASHED LINE INDICATING THE SUN PATH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THE UPPER FLOORS AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE PULLED BACK FROM CAPITOL STREET TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF DIRECT SUNLIGHT AT STREET LEVEL AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COU ST #3 IOWA CITY,IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 V) Z 0 Z Z a W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SITE DIAGRAMMING SHEET NUMBER G002W EXTERIOR FURNITURE & TABLES - WITH CHAIRS (TYPICAL) SCREENING PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) STAIRWAY WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS (TYPICAL) FENCE (TYPICAL) BENCH (TYPICAL) TREE PLANTINGS WITH GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITY SPECIALTY PAVEMENT WILL BE DESIGNED TO COMPLIMENT BUILDING FACADE (TYPICAL) SCREENING PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) STAIRWAY WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS (TYPICAL) FENCE (TYPICAL) SEMI -PRIVATE QUIET COURTYARD - EXTERIOR FURNITURE & TABLES WITH CHAIRS (TYPICAL) FF BRICK PAVEMENT TYPICAL) SHADE TREES AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY I I I I BIKE RACK PARI IN� (5) RACKS (10) BIKES I I VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY FOUNDATION PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ORNAMENTAL TREE WITH GROUNDCOVER IN RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) PUBLIC COURTYARD • BENCH (TYPICAL) SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (TYPICAL) RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY (WIDTH 12'-4" TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ++ + ++ + + ++ ++ +++ ++ + ++ ++ ++ +++ + + + + ++ +++ + + + +�+ ++4 + +4 • i+ + + + •+ + f + +• •+ 1 + + + + +++++ + + + + + + + ++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . . . . . . . qtl_ +++ + + + + ++ VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ORNAMENTAL TREE WITH GROUNDCOVER IN RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) _ • • I• SHADE TREE (TYPICAL) - REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (TYPICAL) - REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES BRICK TO MATCH ADJACENT STREETSCAPE (TYPICAL) • SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES SHADE TREES WITH GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITY VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY • • • BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES BIKE RACK PARKING - (5) RACKS (10) BIKES • � I I I I I I I I I • BIKE RACK PARKING (5) RACKS (10) BIKES BRICK PAVEMENT TYPICAL) SHADE TREES AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY FOUNDATION PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY BIKE RACK PARKING � (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ORNAMENTAL TREE WITH GROUNDCOVER IN RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) �� I ■ it I II I�� • • PUBLIC COURTYARD • BENCH (TYPICAL) DECORATIVE CONCRE (TY ICAL) I 1 1 11 U • INS VA W-MIMM SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES SHADE TREES WITH GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITY VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY r I I I I I I I I I BIKE RACK PARKING (5) RACKS (10) BIKES I I BIKEIRACK PARKING (4) R, IKS (8) BIKES • RETAINING WALL (TYPICAL) LIMESTONE KNEE WALL TO SEPERATE DRIVEWAY LANE FROM CENTRAL PLAZA PRIVACY FENCE (TYPICAL) RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) SEMI -PRIVATE QUIET COURTYARD EXTERIOR LOUNGE FURNITURE & TABLES WITH CHAIRS (TYPICAL) ORNAMENTAL TREES, SHRUBS &PERENNIALS FOR SCREENING IN RAISED PLANTER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE &QUANTITIES -� SHADE TREE (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES BRICK TO MATCH ADJACENT STREETSCAPE (TYPICAL) 1 1 1 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 04.22.2019 319.338.7878 DEE 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS DEE CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 12.06.2019 DEE 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 0 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHEET NUMBER L001 DATE DES 04.22.2019 DEE 07.19.2019 DEE 09.10.2019 DEE 10.21.2019 DEE 12.06.2019 DEE REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHEET NUMBER L001 - --------- CKF NST GBP CKF LTT i � 78 q 165 2 i i I II i PVC PVC uH OVH 6 6 2 L a 2 � PCS � J Ip I� PCS �r 3 32 2 _HBB N46L N L PVC � � HGH HPH H $H - PCS PC's 10 HFW ■ 23 2 HBB 2 �/ HRS HBB 2 GTI]I G I r ;V 3L4 ■ � VDC -I VMP CPD � —CC HVMP � SPD i VMP 1 137 45 SP 57 CER KC 4 VMP 3� 2 99 HRS]CLV � 21 165 - HBB NWL HPH HPH pEOs z 43 4 HBB HFW I HBB PVC CS 34 PVC 2 � 24 � GK 3 4 HPH HFW PCS 2 P 2S 10 N O� 5/HBB _ 32 PJS � PJS 6 PVC 1 L NW P3C 449 / PJS 449 3 « . � 451 _ '. «'+ .' F1 IisB JAS7B 12 17 4 IIIII� / f NWL NWL 19 19 + 493 +'+ « '+ +'+ +• PJS PVC OVH OVH P3C '°`sB � 4� 3 � I � PCS NWL - HBB PCS r/ j PCS PCS 32 30 HBB HPH !3CG VPCS 14 5 32 P3C 424 HBB TCG �NWL 1 14 12 � PC HGH H28HH. 12110 2 HFW \ 4 SP / VDC HBB SPD -- 15 2 36 I 36 � 14 CER VWGK VMP 2 131 GKC 2 102 HRSj CW - 21 AGP PCS I P 8 17 143 CII 61 1, SGS 4 20 CPD GT 4 C2H CLV r GTI 3 3 �—IV75P VDC 143 i � TCG 24 NWS VMP HBB HPH HGH 28 HRS 35 13� HPH 1 10 40 28 HBB 8 HGH 16 SPD SP HGH HFW / 11 PVC 2� � 2 �s � HFW —PCS PVC HPH HqB 32 PCS 32 HFW PVC LLLL 6 i Nyy� NWL 85 � 92 �I II GBA PHM PHM PHM COH PHM PHM J i �i i OH P 2M PM PH PH P $M G2A 2 12 18 18 3 12 12 I i L— i 0 10 20 PLANT SCHEDULE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 1.511 1.5" REMARKS SPACING QUANTITY AGP Acer griseum Paperbark Maple Caliper Varies 4 ASB Amelanchier x graniflora 'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry Caliper Varies 22 CCH Crataegus crusgalli 'Inermis' Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn 1.5" Caliper Varies 3 CER Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 1.5" Caliper Varies 5 CKF Calama rostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Convallaria majalis Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Lily of the Valley #1 6" Cont. 18" 499 585 CLV Cont. 12" COH Celtis Occifentalis Common Hackberry 2" Caliper Varies 6 CPD Cornus alternifolia Pagoda Dogwood 1.5" Caliper Varies 7 GBA Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Autumn Gold Ginkgo 2" Caliper Varies 4 GBP Ginkgo biloba 'Princeton Sentry' Princeton Sentry Ginkgo 2" Caliper Varies 3 GKC Gymnocladus dioicus'Espresso-JFS' Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree 2" Caliper Varies 8 GTI Gleditsia triacanthos inermis'Skyline' Skyline Honeylocust 2" Caliper Varies 8 HBB Hydrangea paniculata 'ILVOBO' Bobo Hydrangea #5 Cont. 48" 50 HFW Hosta sieboldiana 'Frances Williams' Frances Williams Hosta #1 Cont. 48" 26 124 HGH Hosta lancifolia Green Hosta #1 Cont. 24" HPH Hosta 'Patriot' Patriot Hosta #1 Cont. 24" 98 HRS Hemerocalli s 'Ruby Stella' Ruby Stella Daylily #1 Cont. 24" 82 LTT Liriodendron tulipera Tulip Tree 2" Caliper Varies 2 NST Nyssa Sylvatica 'David Odom' Afterburner Tupelo 2" Caliper Varies 4 NWL Nepata racemosa 'Walker's Low' Walker's Low Catmint #1 Cont. 24" 507 OVH Ostrya virgIniana Eastern Hop Hornbeam 2" Caliper Varies 6 PCS Panicum virgatum 'Cheyenne Sky' Cheyenne Sky Switchgrass #1 Cont. 24" 179 PFH Pennisetum alcopecuroides 'Hameln' Hameln Dwarf Fountain Grass #1 Cont. 24" 45 PHM Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' Heavy Metal Switchgrass #1 Cont. 24" 150 PJS Pachysandra Terminalis Japanese Spurge 6" Cont. 12" 2716 PVC Parthenocissus quinquefolia 'Troki' Red Wall Virginia Creeper #1 Cont. 36" 60 RAG Rhus aromatics "Gro -low" Gro -low Fragrant Sumac 24"-30" 5 Gal. 60" 8 SGS Symphoricarpos x doorenbossii 'Kolmgala' Galaxy Snowberry #5 Cont. 30" 34 SPD Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed #1 Cont. 18" 204 TCG Tradescantia x'Concord Grape' Concord Grape Spiderwort #1 Cont. 24" 56 VDC Viburnum opulus'Nanum' Dwarf European Cranberrybush #5 Cont. 30" 60 VMP Vinca minor jPeriwinkle 1 6" 1 Cont. 12" 785 ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Archttects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A 515.339.7800Ld WATERLOO, IA 50703 CONSULTANTS 319.233.8090 CIVIL ENGINEER DESCRIPTION AXIOM CONSULTANTS DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 E COURT ST DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.519.8220 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 19.6220 MEP ENGINEER MEP ENGINE AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 N Z O Z Z a Ld Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO.18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.19.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.10.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 @ NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANS & SCHEDULE SHEET NUMBER L002 SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: A� PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. © PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. © PAINTED CROSSWALK OD PROPOSED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. �E PROPOSED STAIRS. �F PROPOSED BIKE PARKING. © STRUCTURED PARKING ACCESS. HD SEE SHEET L001 FOR DETAILS OF GREEN SPACE AREAS �I BUILDING COLUMN BUILDING OVERHEAD � ---' 1 ® j 0 0 U (G) CG) 0 U �K BUILDING FOUNDATION LINE i © ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION KUM & GO �� o T BURL LEGEND: 25 WESSTREET INGTON ((0 PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. / ® PROPOSED DECORATIVE POST LIGHT FIXTURE. CC°) # PROPOSED SITE AND AREA LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS DOORWAY U PROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS DOORWAY PRIVATE GREEN SPACE 316 SOUTH MADISON' v PUBLIC GREEN SPACE STREET n v I� W LI ' U NOTES: t' 1. REFER TO L001 FOR DETAILS ON LANDSCAPING, PAVERS AND c U PLANTINGS. C C❑) C❑)" 0 i W v 0 ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITY 324 SOUTH MADISON STREET v (SS) C C�� (W10) (ST) — E D OG1UH870H 97RE V 0 � � o a sr E) (� (WS) (W ) (W8) C W8) ®I C G) `D G) 3 C C06 C E) (E) ��!� (E) C❑) C�) sz� CD ) �P� C E) - YO' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET —(WI 2) —(W1 2) C W1 2) —(WI 2) —(WI 2) 0 ( W1 �) V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS C CHWS) CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 S) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING C S) C S) (S) (S) .0 (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) C CND) C CND) C CND) z CND) C CND) (f ND) CND)y C ( CND) C HPS) C HPS) HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HIPS) C ❑H) C ❑H C ❑H) C ❑H) ®H) C 11 H) --'/—E H) ® - C D+ r 0 � � o a sr E) (� (WS) (W ) (W8) C W8) ®I C G) `D G) 3 C C06 C E) (E) ��!� (E) C❑) C�) sz� CD ) �P� C E) - YO' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET — C LPS) C LPS) C S) C LPS) C LPS) C SPS) CND) ( CND) C CND) C CND) C CND; 60 EAST COURT STREET C� —(FO) C F❑) —(F (FO) C F❑ 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) WR) C CHWR) CHWR) CHWS) I C ❑H) < ❑H) ® C ❑H) C 11H)® °C ❑H�-- � ( ❑H) C ❑H) ❑H) — C W) C W) W) C W) C W) (W) (W) (W) C F❑) C F❑) C F❑) C FCS ( F❑) —(FM —(FO) C F❑) (W) C F❑) - C ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 14 B Iowa City, Iowa 52240 — C LPS) C LPS) C S) C LPS) C LPS) C SPS) CND) ( CND) C CND) C CND) C CND; 60 EAST COURT STREET C� —(FO) C F❑) —(F (FO) C F❑ 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) WR) C CHWR) CHWR) CHWS) I C ❑H) < ❑H) ® C ❑H) C 11H)® °C ❑H�-- � ( ❑H) C ❑H) ❑H) — C W) C W) W) C W) C W) (W) (W) (W) C F❑) C F❑) C F❑) C FCS ( F❑) —(FM —(FO) C F❑) (W) C F❑) - C ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U ) z 0z z Ld z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319)337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 OCT. 21, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 DEC. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C001 I., O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 140'-0" 5'-0" 135'-0" A2�1W I ! I COMPACT o88 087 COMPACT I I089 086 � DN I I A2090 � X649'-9" 085 A211W DN I 4 I 091 084 I I 092 IR 083 I I I 093 094 - - - 082 I 095 096 081 080 I I I 097 098 079 078 I 099 100 189 077 I o I 0 � 101 102 188 S 104 187 105 185 076 I I I I 186 I I I I � ®■ I I106 E 184 I _ I 4 � I 107 183 I I I I 108 109 182 181 I I UP � DN I COMPACT 110 111 COMPACT COMPACT 180 179 COMPACT G 113 I I COMPACT COMPACT COMPACTG S COMPACT kol 117 174 173 119 172 171 S G 170 I I I I114 115 176 175 I � I 116 I � I I I 118 I I lu I. I COMPACT 169 I I COM PACT 122 123 168 167 I I - G 125 I COM PAC PAC T 166 165 Aa _ A211 W I = I COMT 126 164 LO I I COMPAC PAC T E 127 163 I COM PAC 128 162 I COM PACT 131 132 159 133 129 130 161 160 I 158 I I I 134 157 156 I I = I 135 136 155 154 I o o I 137 138 153 152 I I 139 151 150 I ■ I I � 1 _ I 140 149 I I I 141 = 148 I I 646'-6" = I I 142 147 I a COMPACT 143 146 4 0 N COMPACT 144 145 C2 A211 W MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN M 1 1/16" = 1'-0" N O A2 A211 W 0 �K, A4 A211 W O A204*2 1I40LIT" I I I I I I I I I I I Q I I I l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l i I I I I I II I I --------------------------------- I I I _ - - - - - •- - - S C2 C2 AkL A211 W A202W LOWER LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN h'F 1/16" = 1'-0" +203W N 0 KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT U RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A10OW A204*2 A202W FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN P% 1 1/16"=l' -O" " BASEMENT LEVEL PARKING - UPPER " O A4 1/16" = 1'-0" O WALL RACK BIKE _ PARKING DIAGRAM (sine view) 40" � � 60'• 48" TYPICAL BIKE RACK KEYPLAN 12" offset for handlebar clearance 7 LOOP WAVE BIKE RACK - 5 BIKE CAPACITY - POWDER COATED ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. �p Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction withal written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C2 SHEET NAME UPPER LLfVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A101W A204V#C2 O bo CC M O 2 3 4 O© O $ 140'-0" 135'-0" A201W 1W C2 C2 A ,AI THIRD Al 1/16" = 1'-0" C2 A202W LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C2 A211 W 203W A204*2 3) 5) (6 140'-0" A201 W C2 C2 A211 W C1+203W Kl A5 A221 W A4 A211 W N 0 P C2 C2 A211 W A202W " SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN " O A4 1/16" = 1'-0" O KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A102W A204V#C2 00 It M O O O© O80 105'-0" 5'-0" 40'-0" 15'-0" 40'-0" 5'-0" A201 W C2 C2 A211 W A2 A211 W O O A4 A211 W C 1 p203W D C2 C2 A211 W A202W FIFTH THRU FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN h 1/16" = 1'-0" N O A204*2 e0 14 M O O ®® O© O 105'-0" O C1+203W O ,DI C2 C2 A& A211 W A202W FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN M� 1/16" = 1'-0" N O KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE N H V W i v a z 0 U)z 0 z z a W Z DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A103W In NORTH ELEVATION OF WEST BUILDING C2 1116" = 1-0" NORTH PERSPECTIVE OF WEST BUILDING AMP LU � I I 31-8 20 21�-8 20 20 268 F D AY ( C Y F A EB ) A Y (F A EB )IFA-ADRB ) W 10 45 5 45 5 z �J14 140 5-1 0-J , ■ - - ■ �■ +eF■ - is on -i r n. ��''�• '}x � 4: 'fir. - -- i 0 REA = 3,0 55 SF FAL AREA = 12,215 SF OF WALL AREA NEST GRADE WEST = EL 659-6 GRADE AT CORNER = EL 659-6 KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD - Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 U 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 60 E COURT ST#3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319"519.6220 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST 43 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319"519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 N Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.091 PRVU DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A201W In UPPER FACADE GLA UPPER FLOOR FACA PERCENT OF GLAZI� Cz 5OU I H tLtVA I IUN LW VVtZS I BUILLMN( 1116 1-0 �y SOUTH PERSPECTIVE OF (NEST BUILDING Ir -; A -j I� i 1 p r. - tw AL� \ �� .. � �. i• �^� �� it G~ '4W 4f;• t V Ilk Af►l 1, .. .. • _� PERSPECTIVE OF ROOF AREAS ZS' KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD - Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 3: 319.338.7878 U 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 U Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7860 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 60 E COURT ST #3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 3: 319-519.6220 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT U RITLAND KUIPER 561 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST 43 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 N Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.091 PRVU DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A202W !WllIN=0M'71 �■[/l►�[/1WITA W11IN: I 1 i loll HWEI11l111"lli 11 IIIII ■■■■■■ or 1 111111 Illll■■�� ■ I SESSION EMEEME ■1III ■�■■■■ oil M I d MENNEN 01 SEEMED 11=11111111 MENNEN ■ 1 MENNEN _—�—� ■ I MENNEN NJ ■■■■r 110 MENNEN pi I N WEEMEM !in MENNEN Em M II 1 �Inlrr.e■� � � � �» I ■■I ■- �.— ■■I ! ■ li 11111111111011 �ll r' i•. �.✓•• Irl .�. I eye •^yy' A �_ ••�P .. ■■l !■wlrr owll■r ■■fir � i•� i � � i �" - i .-a � ,' y.: -. t o� �_ �'_-:;�_, • � � '_ � 1'•�'.'��j► \ �'.'• � r ,# - � � SIS - r � I,' � ply I � �r ■ .�3 - :' ' u Q fill Y � tt qfil J .A� x - r -va - - ,t i7 ..� IC�� 1{� f r'r j 11 � � ��. 'P' . •a�;y� r L r �W�• � ' T }fib iK �•f+r "� •� s�►..T. ��';" �.A A#&, 404 on ■L■S� f J I1' YA 0 0 P 44 0 0 ULU PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT � 3-4 �515151515 10 5 3-4 46-8 DRECOU RT ELEVATION OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.09.1 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without writh permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. 4 PRELIMINAR) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ANC RENDERINGS KEYPLAN SHEET NUMBER A203% MEE SEE 11111■■■ wim- i's 1[!l0go] M►►►1=.'1 1E:11111 IN ■I I soII !! ■■ I =NONE E 1! ■I ■_ MEEMIEW 11 1 I 11 11 Emmons II NEEMIN IIII I■ I IN ■1 MEMNON ■■■i■ !I■ ■ ■■ ■ � ■■■■■■ n ss� sss ss� Air .I s. sy s. sss� sss� sss. rss.1M- Mss. 11 1 omL �i� X11 ■ IN ■ 11 1 MEMNON ■! ■■■■■ �! ■ ■■ i ■ t1■11■ 11MMNNNEMIN �1 ■�■ ■■ �C■ I MEMNON !!_IIIII�IIIW ■■■■�■ IIIIIIIIII M WWMM _ 11111111 MEMNON IIIIIMAINEN MEMNON !i�illlllil ■■■■■■ 1IRMO no MEN! 11111111■■■■■ 5111111MEMEME :I ■ ■ 11,111EN 1■■■■■■ MMIN■■■■■■ 11' 11111111 MENNEN I I 11■111111�ml I ■■■ ■■ !!='-ImRMiMi .■ 111111"IIIIIIIIMEMNON 111111111:liffill'1111'== ■1 MEMNON IN IIIIIIIIII[.: ■■■1�! 111111111��!��e!!�MON Ili ■MMOMNEW■ I1■111111111111 ■_■■■■■ 1111II I ■I■■ ■■■:■■■I_ 111E1MM1EM1M oilED 11111mm �- � ----NOM-000 Elm NEW M MW .11 OPEN TO COURT lYf�l�■■■ IIIIIIIII_iA��STREETmill 11 PAS OUGH . - .-. 1A 1 1� WE - sq i 1 M film@" 1 1 111■■■■■■ II oil .■■■■E _____ 1! Emmons I ME1111111 MENEM■ ■�' IIIIIIIII ■i■■■■ ■� Liiii�iiiil 'r`�___ il 111111111111111 MENEM■ ■� 1!!91!!0 ■■■�!■ maNllila 11:1[11[1[[1 ENEENE Elm 10111 ■1■�■� 11.111[[ 11[[ ■ ■■■�■ ■l■ IIIIIIIII mm■■■■ 11111111111111 M NONE■ II IMEEMER 11_ MENEM■ I ■�� IIIIIIIII ■■■.■� 11m 11 1-1110101011111111 Nil M. MMMMMM Ell 0 0 r 12 EAST COURT s r I FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE ' I SOUTH = EL 659-9 r .......... ..... .r...........R.......................................................................... some M.. ■■■ r ............. I GRADE AT CORNER = EL 656-3 e SARAGE ENTRY ---\, >- 50 10 50 60 I LU �LU z HU (fill i OWNER It I:� 1111; i..:. 100-500 LLC f . C 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111,1111 tjl!#I all IIS I' PROJECT NO. 18.094 uVl }L :q6°1 u ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION ' 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 rlN I-•' 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 _ .I...— 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 *Rim NIP l�' 1 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without writtf permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. - PRELIMINAR) ` NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ANC RENDERINGS J Wk ivlIc NORTH ELEVATION OF WEST BUILDING COURTYARD CAPITOL STREET f,,j SOUTH ELEVATION OF WEST BUILDING COURTYARD V 1 1116" = 1' 0" -ION ABOVE COURTYARD CONNECTION ABOVE COURTYARD Al TYPICAL COURTYARD PERSPECTIVE AD TYPICAL COURTYARD ENTRY PERSPECTIVE r01-2111 01-2„1 COR D 5 3" = V-0" NICE DETAIL [01-2111 METAL "CORNICE" TRIM METAL TUBE FRAME METAL PANEL COR C 5 3" = V-0" NICE DETAIL KEYPLAN IETAL "CORNICE" TRIM ETAL PANEL XTFRI(1R \A/01 I ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COU ST #3 IOWA CITY,IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 V) Z 0 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBE 5A205W B5 206 W01 SINGLE 5'-0" 3" 3" W04 SINGLE .,,_n., 1'-8" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" 3 1/2" 1/2" 3 1/2" 00 Oo DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 ,--3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 0 0 206 �f3 in in — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 O O 00 O O 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 O IOWA CITY, IA 52240 C5 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) � Z 206 _ 0 0 I I I I I I - o0 I I I I I I L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J W02 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 3'-4" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" 1/2" 3 1/2" 1/2" 3 1/2" 00 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 ,--3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 0 206 �f3 in CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 O 319.519.6220 00 O 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 O IOWA CITY, IA 52240 C5 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) � Z 206 _ 0 0 I I I I I I - a0 I I I I I I L- — — — — — — — — — — — — L — — — — — — — — — — — — -J W03 SIDE-BY-SIDE W05 SIDE-BY-SIDE .in,_n" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" blutI-by-Slut 5'-0" 5-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 1/2" 3 1/2" 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3" Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 ,--3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 206 �f3 CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 319.519.6220 00 RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 O IOWA CITY, IA 52240 C5 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) � Z 206 _ 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J W07 GROUPED ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS A3 1/2" = 1'-0" TRIM DICAL DICAL STRUCTURAL FLOOR SPANDREL TRIM PANEL COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM D5 WINDOW SPANDREL DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM WINDOW MULLION TRIM DETAIL V %J 3„ = 1'-0" IDOW TRIM, D WINDOW, TRIM PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM TERRACOTTA PANEL EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM WINDOW JAMB TRIM DETAIL vv 3„ = 1'-0" KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A206W OVER ROOF 832'-8" O i 0 LEVEL 15 822'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 14 812'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 13 802'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 12 792'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 11 782'-8" 0 O LEVEL 10 772'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 09 762'-8" 0 O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O O LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O r LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" O O r LEVEL 04 712'-8" o0 LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O r LEVEL 02 691'-0" O ir) r LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" c7 LEVEL 01 C Eo 672'-8" SHAKE BAR 668'-0" CO N LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" O LEVEL B2 WEST 646'-6" O LEVEL B3 WEST 637'-6" BUILDING SECTION NS @ WEST BUILDING C2 1/16" = 1'-0" O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 T LEVEL 07 742-8" 0 0 LEVEL 06 732'-8" O 0 LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 00 T LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O LEVEL 02 691'-0" O in LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" 0 00 SHAKE BAR 668'-0" (O N r LEVEL B1 WEST LEVEL B2 WEST 646'-6" O LEVEL B3 WEST OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0'_ 5 6 7 ---------------------- BUILDING SECTION EW NORTH A2 1/16" = 1'-0" WEST BUILDING OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" — — — — _ O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O r LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 06 732'-8" O 0 LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 04 712'-8" o0 r ® ® T 6 O 8 -------------------- ---L---------------- L ----- BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" WEST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD LEVEL 03 Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 701'-0" O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 LEVEL 02 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 691'-0" CONSULTANTS 60 - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 IA 5 5 LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" N r WATERLOO, IA 50703 LEVEL B1 WEST 319.233.8090 655'-6" 0 NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 LEVEL B2 WEST ® ® T 6 O 8 -------------------- ---L---------------- L ----- BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" WEST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 IA 5 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 222 IA 5 5 40 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A21 1 W LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" BURLINGI STREET SHAKE BAR 668'-0" A A. FRONTAG Al 1/8" = 1'-0" E SECTION a N LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" An FRONTAGE SECTION @ S hL 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 B 674'-4" SHAKE BAR 668'-0" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" FRONTAG A3 1/8" = 1'-0" E SECTION B NE LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" FRONTAG A41/8" = 1'-0" E SECTION B SE LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 TRACK 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" PARKING U RT TYPICAL FORECOURT ENTRY CANOPY V V 1/8" = 1'-0" 5'-0" 4'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" METAL SCREEN WALL METAL SCREEN W METAL ENTRANCE PORTAL METAL ENTRAN PORI DEWALK N CAPITOL FREET LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 666'-0" BIKE PARKING LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY A5 1/8" = 1'-0" A6 1/8" = 1'-0" ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IA 5 40 5 IOWA CITY, 222 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A221 W + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = + AD 0 0.0 0.0Fr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.4 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • • I o • I + + - + +• + + + + + + + - + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.9 1.9 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0. 4 10. 9. 1 2 0.�� 0.0 0.0 .. • 1771 .0 0. 0. .4 16.0 8.3 8.9 11.9 .5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ❑ a 40 0 0. .7 1 .5 9.6 9. 10.9 .3 4.0 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. « ).4 X6.4 5.6 5.4 6.2 5 ■ .6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0 2� .7 2.4 1.8 1.7 + ■ 1 + 2 + + 3.4 . 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + - ' + )) + + + + - + .0 2 1. 1.2 1 .5 1.5 0.6 0.6 1.6 Z1 4 .8 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 PRIVATE • GREEN ■ SPACE .0 + 2 1a .0 �i.2 + .6 2.8 0.9 0.8 2.0 + + .0 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 1.8 .8 5.1 7.9 8.6 7.8 + 0 6.7 +. + 0.0 + 0 0.0 » c )) .0 0.5 2.1 .8 9.4 8.9 8.8 9�5 + ■ 5. 1.8 0.0 + 0 0.0 0 .0 .3 1 + .0 .9 7.5 .3 8. 1 + .7 ❑ 8 .� 3 + 0.3 0 1 0.0 =z • W � .0 0.1 ❑3 .6 9.5 .0 8 9�5 4 1 2.� .8 ++ ! 5 0.1 Q ® v 13 . 0 0 0.6 � . 1 2 5 . �' C w) � < w) C w) +w) �) 5.� 5 .9 3.7 6.1 7. 4.2 1. 0.1 �w) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) (w) (w) (G) (G) (G) C ) C CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) • H + + CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) C ) + + « .0 0.4 1.6 .3 0 4 0.5 0.7 .B. 4 5 9 5.4 + 0.2 .0 0. +.9 .1 0 9 0. 0.5 .4 6 5 3 1 0.2 • M o 0 .1 0. 1.4 .3 6. .8 1.8 0. 0.5 +.2 3 5. + +° 0.1 3�3 0 o � o .1 0 2.0 PRIVATE GREEN .3 1.5 0 6 , . 0.5 .6 2 5. 2.1 0:5 .1 0 SPACE R .1 0. 1.3 2.4 a.7 .9 2.8 1.2 1.1 + 3. 2.6 D +1.4 , 6.0 8.6 8.4 2 0.8 6� ) 5.2 o .1 0.4 1.6 11.2 .4 7. 8.6 9 5.2 c » .1 C 0 96.8 T0AIA .5 8. 2® v �.3 ELI v v v • • 0 • .0 0. 2,❑ 203 .5 2.1 1.. 1 1.9 2.-6 2.5 0 + + • + +k + + + + + + + .0 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.5 .0..6 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.� 3.2 3.2 .4 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 E COURU 37G EEE • � 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 FOE0.3 .3 0.2 ❑H C ❑H) C ❑H) C H+ CDH) ( ❑H)❑H) C El H) El H) C ❑H) -- C ❑H) C C ❑H) H) C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) Cb+ ❑Ifi C ❑+ C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) °C ❑H►- < ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) 0 0C 0.0 0 0.1 0.1 0 0 1 + + + +❑ + + + + + +� + a0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL OUTDOOR LIGHT OUTPUT TAG QUANTITY LUMENS TOTAL LUMENS F-1 74 6,988 517,112 F-2 14 3,237 45,318 DESIGN TEAM TOTAL 562,430 LUMENS PER NET ACRE (3.4) 165 420 1 1 1 LIGHTING PLAN KEYNOTES: Q)) F-1: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: 121 -32L -700 -NW -G3-4 MOUNTING: WALL MOUNTED AT 15" F-2: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: PPT-140L-650-NW-G2-3-UNV MOUNTING: POLE MOUNTED AT 15' GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC 2017 AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. 2. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE LISTED BY A RECOGNIZED TEST LAB. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL AND CONNECT ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT FOR THIS WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. COORDINATE LIGHT FIXTURE PLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION WITH LANDSCAPE. 5. COORDINATE ELECTRICAL ROUTE WITH UTILITY COMPANY AND MEP. .--- 0)) F-1: WALL MOUNTED SCONCE LIGHT FIXTURE * F-2: DECORATIVE POST TOP LIGHT FIXTURE ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 IEEE 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN TEAM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 CIVIL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 z 0 U) Z 0Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 IDESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT 13, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. RECORD DRAWINGS This record drawing has been prepared, in part, based upon information furnished by others. While this information is believed to be reliable, the Architect assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of this record drawing or for any errors or omissions that may have been incorporated into it as a result of incorrect information provided to the Architect. Those relying on this record document are advised to obtain independent verification of its accuracy. SHEET NAME LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRICS PLAN SHEET NUMBER E001 VICINITY MAP N O KEY PLAN BURLINGTON STREET COURT STREET N O 12 EAST COURT IOWA CITY, IOWA EAST BUILDING INDEX OF DRAWINGS PRESENTATION G001E TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX G002E SITE DIAGRAMMING L001 E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN L001 E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN C001 E CIVIL PLAN A100E LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101E UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS Al 02E SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS Al 03E FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS Al 04E FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS GS A206E ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS A221 BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001 E LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN CODE REVIEW General Information Residential Unit Count Efficiency U 4pds 2 07.29.2019 1 -Bed 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 2 -Bed 144 288 3 -Bed 125 °o).) 375 Total 26 820 Motor Vehicle Parking Count Required 1/4 per bedroom = Provided Car Stalls 208 (0 car stal s wil be deslgne as 60 scooter stalls) Bike Parking Count 1 stall for first 50 residen " its, 1/2 stall for remaining residential units Required 50 + (1/2 x 388)= 4 Provided Interior 4 Exterior 2 [246 Building Amenity Interior Academic 9,824 sq.ft Interior Recreation 0 sq.ft. Exterior 10,351 sq.ft 20,175 sq.ft Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" - 4'-0" +/- at Ca itol Street Rear 5'-0" - Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Fle with subordinate Forecourt Glazing between 2 and 10 Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Provided 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedrogeds Required .ft. per bedroom q.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt E1 1,796sq.ft. Forecourt E2 2,356sq.ft. Courtyar 2,219 sq.ft. Courtyar E2 3,961 sq.ft. 10,332 sq.ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provide 25%(min) See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Allowed Transfer gia Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 09 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 10 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 11 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 12 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 13 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 14 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 153,936 sq.ft 153,936 sq.ft Student Housing Requesting 1 floor or 25,656 sq.ft. of height bonus. Floor Floor Area Bonus Area 15 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. Minor Adjustment #2- The owner requests approval of a deviation from the facade continuity requirement set forth in 14-2G-3, "Subdistrict Standards." The proposed north facade has less than 75% continuity due to alley access to parking and service areas. ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE 2 V Q Z Z Q Ld Z DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX SHEET NUMBER G001 E SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: A� PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. © PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. © PAINTED CROSSWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. PROPOSED STAIRS. �F PROPOSED BIKE PARKING. © STRUCTURED PARKING ACCESS. ;- HD SEE SHEET L001 FOR DETAILS OF GREEN SPACE AREAS �I BUILDING COLUMN BUILDING OVERHEAD U 0 U 0 W 00 w W I w V } W 5' $ETBCK - w ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITY 324 SOUTH MADISON STREET W w Q W E (S8) C S8) (�8) = =�= W1 0) (W1 0) W� - (W1 )( G) t y (ST) T) (W1 2) (W1 2) ( W1 2) (W1 2) (W1 2) O 0 (W1 2) ( CHWS) ( S) (S) (S) C S) S) S) (S) (S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) C LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) _ ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) Li - (HPS) C HPS) _ (HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) (HPS) (HPS) _ (❑H) (❑H (❑F+) (❑H) (9H) (11H) -�-❑H) ® (C3+ E O WHIH ON 97RE V f ^t r , G) ( G) o \ O I� � W ) C W8) (W8) (W8) C co I— I S CS) CS) (S) (S) (S) (S) CS) 3 � (G) C G) G) C G G) ( G) (G) WR) ( C E) E)� (E) ( E) ,❑ , L ��CD) C❑) R7J8 (❑) CD ) C❑) ( REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER TO ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALK EXTENSION 710' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET (SSS S 4 LLU -moo E '4F7777 60 EAST COURT STREET BENffmm C T) o� CID _ ° (Iwo I (F ) —(FED C F❑) C F❑) ( F11)E co v y 1 1 2) CHW S8) ) (S8) (S8) C S8C ) C S8) CCC(W�—(CHWR) WR) S (W1 2) (W CW1 2) (WI 2) 1W ) WCHWR) WR) HWR) HWR) HR CHR(HWR)(CH(CHWR) CHW) 2) C R) CCH ) CHWR) (CHWR) (C WR) (CHWR RCHWS(8) 8 (S8) (CHWS) S8)SS8) (S8) S(( - LPS) (LPS) o ( LPS(L S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( CND) ( CND) _ ( CND) C CND) (CN C CND) (CND) CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) L7 ®- ([1H)—�— (❑H) (DH) ( ❑H) C ❑H)� � ❑ ( [I H) (T] H) �� C ❑H) ( ❑H) ® (❑H) (11H)® °C ❑H— C ❑H) ([]H) ❑H) W) (W) (W) (W) (W) ( W) ( W) (W) (W) (W (F❑) C W) (F❑) C W) (F❑) (F11)(FCS C F❑) (F❑) C F❑) (FID(F❑) F( (W) CFO ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 U �K BUILDING FOUNDATION LINE V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 © ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 KUM & GO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER �1 o LEGEND: 25 T BURL WESSTREET INGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U ) ((0 PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. 0z ® PROPOSED DECORATIVE POST LIGHT FIXTURE. C❑; - # PROPOSED SITE AND AREA LIGHT FIXTURE. Ld z PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS DOORWAY U PROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS DOORWAY PRIVATE GREEN SPACE 316 SOUTH MADISON' STREET v PUBLIC GREEN SPACE n v EMM= - NOTES: W 1. REFER TO L001 FOR DETAILS ON LANDSCAPING, PAVERS AND c U PLANTINGS. ( C❑) c❑)w 0 W 00 w W I w V } W 5' $ETBCK - w ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITY 324 SOUTH MADISON STREET W w Q W E (S8) C S8) (�8) = =�= W1 0) (W1 0) W� - (W1 )( G) t y (ST) T) (W1 2) (W1 2) ( W1 2) (W1 2) (W1 2) O 0 (W1 2) ( CHWS) ( S) (S) (S) C S) S) S) (S) (S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) C LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) _ ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) Li - (HPS) C HPS) _ (HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) (HPS) (HPS) _ (❑H) (❑H (❑F+) (❑H) (9H) (11H) -�-❑H) ® (C3+ E O WHIH ON 97RE V f ^t r , G) ( G) o \ O I� � W ) C W8) (W8) (W8) C co I— I S CS) CS) (S) (S) (S) (S) CS) 3 � (G) C G) G) C G G) ( G) (G) WR) ( C E) E)� (E) ( E) ,❑ , L ��CD) C❑) R7J8 (❑) CD ) C❑) ( REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER TO ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALK EXTENSION 710' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET (SSS S 4 LLU -moo E '4F7777 60 EAST COURT STREET BENffmm C T) o� CID _ ° (Iwo I (F ) —(FED C F❑) C F❑) ( F11)E co v y 1 1 2) CHW S8) ) (S8) (S8) C S8C ) C S8) CCC(W�—(CHWR) WR) S (W1 2) (W CW1 2) (WI 2) 1W ) WCHWR) WR) HWR) HWR) HR CHR(HWR)(CH(CHWR) CHW) 2) C R) CCH ) CHWR) (CHWR) (C WR) (CHWR RCHWS(8) 8 (S8) (CHWS) S8)SS8) (S8) S(( - LPS) (LPS) o ( LPS(L S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( CND) ( CND) _ ( CND) C CND) (CN C CND) (CND) CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) L7 ®- ([1H)—�— (❑H) (DH) ( ❑H) C ❑H)� � ❑ ( [I H) (T] H) �� C ❑H) ( ❑H) ® (❑H) (11H)® °C ❑H— C ❑H) ([]H) ❑H) W) (W) (W) (W) (W) ( W) ( W) (W) (W) (W (F❑) C W) (F❑) C W) (F❑) (F11)(FCS C F❑) (F❑) C F❑) (FID(F❑) F( (W) CFO ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U ) z 0z z Ld z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319)337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 OCT. 21, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 DEC. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C001 A2 A211 A4 A211 90 10 11 12 13 14 15 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 140'-0" C1 A211E A of MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN M 1 1/16" = 1'-0" N O C1 A211E 140'-0" LOWER LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN h't 1/16" = 1'-0" N KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE IDESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER Al OOE FUTURE ELEVATED PEDESTRIAN WALK ABOVE A203+C2 9Q 10 11 12, 13 14 15 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N Al 1/16" = V-0" O BASEMENT LEVEL PARKING - UPPER h'P 1/16" = V-0" N O WALL RACK BIKE PARKING DIAGRAM (side view) rfr`cnt view) X40 �16�! � p i EI if � � � jfi" 1� � 12" offset for 4� k� handlebar clearance 48" 5 LOOP WAVE BIKE 7 BIKE CAPACITY ER COATED TYPICAL BIKE RACK KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A101E A203*C2 O 00 M A2 A211E 0 0 M 0 O O r O A5 r A2211 O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 9 10 11 12 (1 (4J 140'-0" 75'-5" 59'-7" A201E C2 C1 A211E F779ISF 2BD 781 SF 2BD A934 SF ■■ A2 A211E STAIR MECH 2BD 941 SF 113D 652 652 SF ELEV STAIR rM - MECHANICAL TERCE 46'-8" WITHLOUVERSOSED 2BD 650 SF (UTILITY ECH METERS) A203E :: C5 k7464 D SF 7SF3 CORRIDOR 3BD RECYCL 967 SF 2BD 763 SF A6 A221 O I I O O O C2 C1 A202E A211E A o4 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN M 1/16" = 1'-0" A203*C2 O O O O O " SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN " A4 1/16" =1'-0" KEYP LAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O hi Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A102 E A203*C2 O 00 M 9O 10 1D 12 13 14 15 120'-0" C2AL C1 A211E A202E Aol FIFTH THRU FOURTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN P% 1 1/16" = 1'-0" N O A4 A211E O O C O A203*C2 O 50 M C2AL C1 A211E A202E A A FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PW 1/16" = 1'-0" A4 A211E O O O O O N KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE U-) H V W H 2 V Q Z O N Z O f Z Z Q f Ld Z DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER Al 03E A203*C2 00 M x C2 C1 A211E A202E FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN J'%'t 1/16" = V-0" N O A4 A211E O O O O O KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 1021 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER Al 04E P OVE EpP BUIL GRA AVE FIREZ NOR CL G ■ vv—� L 12-J NORTH ELEVATION OF EAST BUILDING C2 1116" = T-0" _ s - `, r � I d PERSPECTIVE EAST BUILDING COURTYARD KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 1&094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION N H V W H 2 V Q Z O N Z O f Z Z a W Z 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Manson Inc. is prohibited - PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A201 E P SOUTH ELEVATION OF EAST BUILDING C2 1116" = V-0" n SOUTH PERSPECTIVE OF EAST BUILDING I t w I wpw Z 4 515151515-515151515151515 FA26-$ AY F DOE B ) ( C2o Y 25 45 I 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1515l, --21-8 20 31-8 F A E B F AY Y LU 15 45 10 I p w 140 54 o Z KEYPLAN =3,075SF SOUTH = EL 668 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 1&094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION N H V W H 2 V Q Z O N Z O f Z Z a W Z 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Manson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A202E P OVERLAY HEIGH- ......................... BUILDING STEPB, = EL 712-8 ......................... STOREFR GLAZING 68% OF VA FIRST FLOOR AB NORTH = EL 676 1N �sI9I 11MCi1;1011 AVERAGE GRADE BUILDING = EL 67 1-10- 368 1 1 C2WEST ELEVATION OF EAST BUILDING �+ 2 1116" = T-0" (NEST PERSPECTIVE OF EAST BUILDING 2 3-4 TYPICAL FORECOURT ELEVATION C5 1116" = V-0° KEYPLAN 3 ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 U 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 IA 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) z 0 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 1&094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, dsclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Manson Inc. is prohibited - PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A203E OVERL BUILC AVER; BUILDI ....e .......................... e............................... [..[uuu[.uu.........................................,.......... F1RST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE � SOUTH = EL 672-8 i �10 w IL w � �•, EAST ELEVATION - EAST C21116" = V-0" PERSPECTIVE OF ROOF AREAS 0 lJ J'I LlJV1 \ILV Y Y I I I I I yLL HEIGHT GUARDRAILS. TYPICAL 50 D I EAST )VE GRADE •...................................`.[i[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[.[[[.• I f - W 10 I p Lia ccz 10--1 0- PERSPECTIVE Ti � PICAL FRONTAGE FACADE I KEYPLAN 0 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 >!_l,! C S n,, NORTH ELEVATION EAST BUILDING COURTYARD V 1 1116" = 1'-0' JNECTION ►VE COURTYARD CONNECTION ^O^",COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION EAST BUILDING COURTYARD C1 1/16"!= T-0• ►L f A A TYPICAL COURTYARD PERSPECTIVE P% I A,, TYPICAL COURTYARD ENTRY PERSPECTIVE Pill - �- x021 CORNICE DETAIL V J 3" = V-0„ U-2" .. CORNICE DETAIL V J 3" = V-0" KEYPLAN METAL "CORNICE" TRIM METAL TUBE FRAME METAL PANEL METAL "CORNICE" TRIM METAL PANEL EXTERIOR WALL ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 Z Z Q Ld Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER 1 A20SE W01 SINGLE 5'-0" 3" 3" W04 SINGLE 1'-8" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" 221 East College Street I Suite 303 C? Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 0 0 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS in in - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 0 0 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 i � M I I I I I I - 0? I I I I I I L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � W02 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 3'-4" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 C? Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 0 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS in CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 0 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 i � M I I I I a? I I I I I I L - - - - - - - - - - - -L- - - - - - - - - - - -J W03 SIDE-BY-SIDE W05 SIDE-BY-SIDE 30'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" oivF--o I -oivF- 1 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'4" 1 W07 GROUPED ENLARGED WINDOW ELE A3 1,2" = 1'-0" VATIONS TRIM DICAL 'ICAL STRUCTURAL FLOOR SPANDREL TRIM PANEL COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM D5 WINDOW SPANDREL DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM WINDOW MULLION TRIM DETAIL C53" = 1'-0" IDOW TRIM, D WINDOW, TRIM PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM TERRACOTTA PANEL EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM WINDOW JAMB TRIM DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18,094 b&I1IL DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A206E OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" ROOF 832'-8" O 0 LEVEL 15 822'-8" 0 O LEVEL 14 812'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 13 802'-8' 0 0 LEVEL 12 792'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 11 782'-8" O 0 LEVEL 10 772'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 09 762'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 08 752'-8" O O r LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" O O r LEVEL 04 712'-8" 00 B �G J K L M N O P Q BUILDING SECTION NS @ EAST BUILDING C1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 04 00 LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O LEVEL 02 691'-0" O iA LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" CV i zo LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 10 11 12 13 14 99 11 12 13 14 _OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BUILDING SECTION EW NORTH @ EAST BUILDING A2 1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 —82-2'-8- LEVEL 22'-8"LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722-8" 0 0 00 O O r ._01. LEVEL 01.5 678'-6" LOLEVEL 01 C 672'-8" V O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 641'-10" 197 BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" EAST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD LEVEL 03 Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 701' -0" O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 LEVEL 02 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 691'-0" CONSULTANTS BUF CIVIL ENGINEER STR (V LEVEL 01.5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 678'-6" RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 LEVEL 01 A (V 676'-0" STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LEVEL 01 C NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 672'-8" O _ r (V r AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 LEVEL 131 EAST 319-519-6220 659'-10" O Z O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O Z LEVEL B3 EAST 641'-10" B �G J K L M N O P Q BUILDING SECTION NS @ EAST BUILDING C1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 04 00 LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O LEVEL 02 691'-0" O iA LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" CV i zo LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 10 11 12 13 14 99 11 12 13 14 _OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BUILDING SECTION EW NORTH @ EAST BUILDING A2 1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 —82-2'-8- LEVEL 22'-8"LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722-8" 0 0 00 O O r ._01. LEVEL 01.5 678'-6" LOLEVEL 01 C 672'-8" V O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 641'-10" 197 BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" EAST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Ld Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. ENORELIMINARY T FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A21 1 E LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" BURLINGTON STREET LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" LEVEL 131 EAST 659'-10" FRONTAGE SECTION @ N Al1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01.5 678'-6" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL 131 EAST 659'-10" . S 9 9 I I I I COURT STREET AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 673'-0" FRONTAGE SECTION @ S A21/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" SIDEWALK ON CAPITOL STRE LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 673'-0" LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" FRONTAGE SECTION @ W A3 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" SIDEWALK OI CAPITOL STR AVERAGE ELEV. 673 LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL 131 EAST 659'-10" FRONTAGE SECTION @ W A4 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" METAL SCREEN Wf METAL ENTRANCE PORTAL AVERAGI ELEV. 67 LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" PARKING LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" I TY P I C61/8" = 1'-0" '9 ; 4'-0" TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY P%*J 1/8" = 1'-0" CAL FORECOURT ENTRY CANOPY MOPED PARKING LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" SCREEN WALL _ENTRANCE 1L :VEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" w� TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY 1/8" = 1'-0" ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A221E + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = + AD 0 0.0 0.0Fr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.4 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • • I o • I + + - + +• + + + + + + + - + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.9 1.9 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0. 4 10. 9. 1 2 0.�� 0.0 0.0 .. • 1771 .0 0. 0. .4 16.0 8.3 8.9 11.9 .5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ❑ a 40 0 0. .7 1 .5 9.6 9. 10.9 .3 4.0 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. « ).4 X6.4 5.6 5.4 6.2 5 ■ .6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0 2� .7 2.4 1.8 1.7 + ■ 1 + 2 + + 3.4 . 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + - ' + )) + + + + - + .0 2 1. 1.2 1 .5 1.5 0.6 0.6 1.6 Z1 4 .8 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 PRIVATE • GREEN ■ SPACE .0 + 2 1a .0 �i.2 + .6 2.8 0.9 0.8 2.0 + + .0 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 1.8 .8 5.1 7.9 8.6 7.8 + 0 6.7 +. + 0.0 + 0 0.0 » c )) .0 0.5 2.1 .8 9.4 8.9 8.8 9�5 + ■ 5. 1.8 0.0 + 0 0.0 0 .0 .3 1 + .0 .9 7.5 .3 8. 1 + .7 ❑ 8 .� 3 + 0.3 0 1 0.0 =z • W � .0 0.1 ❑3 .6 9.5 .0 8 9�5 4 1 2.� .8 ++ ! 5 0.1 Q ® v 13 . 0 0 0.6 � . 1 2 5 . �' C w) � < w) C w) +w) �) 5.� 5 .9 3.7 6.1 7. 4.2 1. 0.1 �w) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) (w) (w) (G) (G) (G) C ) C CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) • H + + CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) C ) + + « .0 0.4 1.6 .3 0 4 0.5 0.7 .B. 4 5 9 5.4 + 0.2 .0 0. +.9 .1 0 9 0. 0.5 .4 6 5 3 1 0.2 • M o 0 .1 0. 1.4 .3 6. .8 1.8 0. 0.5 +.2 3 5. + +° 0.1 3�3 0 o � o .1 0 2.0 PRIVATE GREEN .3 1.5 0 6 , . 0.5 .6 2 5. 2.1 0:5 .1 0 SPACE R .1 0. 1.3 2.4 a.7 .9 2.8 1.2 1.1 + 3. 2.6 D +1.4 , 6.0 8.6 8.4 2 0.8 6� ) 5.2 o .1 0.4 1.6 11.2 .4 7. 8.6 9 5.2 c » .1 C 0 96.8 T0AIA .5 8. 2® v �.3 ELI v v v • • 0 • .0 0. 2,❑ 203 .5 2.1 1.. 1 1.9 2.-6 2.5 0 + + • + +k + + + + + + + .0 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.5 .0..6 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.� 3.2 3.2 .4 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 E COURU 37G EEE • � 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 FOE0.3 .3 0.2 ❑H C ❑H) C ❑H) C H+ CDH) ( ❑H)❑H) C El H) El H) C ❑H) -- C ❑H) C C ❑H) H) C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) Cb+ ❑Ifi C ❑+ C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) °C ❑H►- < ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) 0 0C 0.0 0 0.1 0.1 0 0 1 + + + +❑ + + + + + +� + a0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL OUTDOOR LIGHT OUTPUT TAG QUANTITY LUMENS TOTAL LUMENS F-1 74 6,988 517,112 F-2 14 3,237 45,318 DESIGN TEAM TOTAL 562,430 LUMENS PER NET ACRE (3.4) 165 420 1 1 1 LIGHTING PLAN KEYNOTES: Q)) F-1: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: 121 -32L -700 -NW -G3-4 MOUNTING: WALL MOUNTED AT 15" F-2: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: PPT-140L-650-NW-G2-3-UNV MOUNTING: POLE MOUNTED AT 15' GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC 2017 AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. 2. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE LISTED BY A RECOGNIZED TEST LAB. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL AND CONNECT ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT FOR THIS WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. COORDINATE LIGHT FIXTURE PLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION WITH LANDSCAPE. 5. COORDINATE ELECTRICAL ROUTE WITH UTILITY COMPANY AND MEP. .--- 0)) F-1: WALL MOUNTED SCONCE LIGHT FIXTURE * F-2: DECORATIVE POST TOP LIGHT FIXTURE ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 IEEE 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN TEAM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 CIVIL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 z 0 U) Z 0Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 IDESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT 13, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. RECORD DRAWINGS This record drawing has been prepared, in part, based upon information furnished by others. While this information is believed to be reliable, the Architect assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of this record drawing or for any errors or omissions that may have been incorporated into it as a result of incorrect information provided to the Architect. Those relying on this record document are advised to obtain independent verification of its accuracy. SHEET NAME LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRICS PLAN SHEET NUMBER E001 12 EAST COURT (FORMER PENTACREST GARDEN APARTMENTS) Enforceable Security Plan Resubmittal September 2019 Form Based Development Worksheet Item G.8.b.(1) — Page 19 Ax,OMCONSULTANTS 60 E. COURT ST, IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 1319.519.6220 AXIOM PROJECT # 18-0003 AmOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. PURPOSE... 1 II. FACILITY PROFILE... 1 FLOORPLANS... 2 III. SECURITY SYSTEMS... 3 LIGHTING STRATEGY... 3 CCTV... 4 ACCESS CONTROLS... 4 ALARMS... 5 ON-SITE MANAGEMENT AND SECURITY... 5-6 IV. INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS... 6 PHYSICAL SECURITY... 6 DATA COMMUNICATIONS... 6 V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES... 6 BUILDING MANAGEMENT... 6-7 TENANT and STAFF... 7 VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES... 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES... 8 VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES... 9-10 IX. SPECIAL EVENTS... 10 I. PURPOSE This Enforceable Security Plan establishes a schematic Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for building security controls, implementation of security monitoring, and management of the overall system. In addition to establishing the SOP, this revised plan is provided as part of the overall Design Review Documents requirements for the September 2019 resubmittal. It is the intent of document to detail how our plan meets the requirements as stated in the Form Based Development Worksheet - item G.8.b.(1) — page 19. Overall, we want to reserve the capability to evolve this system over the life of the project design so that it will better serve the residents who live here by maximizing available technologies and capabilities of available systems as they evolve. Smart phone technology will be key to the overall implementation of this plan and we plan to provide an agile, flexible, and trackable service. This will help eliminate unwanted access to the facility and better control over who has access and when, as well as giving them the ability to quickly report (and respond) to requests. Most importantly — we need the facility to remain functionally relevant for as long as possible and want to make the entire project as adaptable, safe, and usable for a variety of residents as much as we are able. While the intent of the facility is to be primarily students to start, we don't know that it will stay that way or how the facility will evolve over the life of the building. We intend for this building to have a 100 -year lifespan. II. FACILITY PROFILE The 12 East Court Street (12EC) site, formerly known as Pentacrest Garden Apartments, is composed of a 3.4 -acre lot with a proposed total building footprint in excess of one -million square feet. The site will have four (4) mixed-use buildings on it, that are connected North -to -South above the fifth floor at the primary step -back. An underground parking facility two levels deep sits underneath both the West and East set of buildings. All of the four buildings are fronted by forecourts that lead to the primary entry point/lobby of each building. All of the buildings except for the Northeast one have rear private courtyards as well. The overall site is split West -to -East by a central pedestrian concourse per the Master Plan. South Capitol street will run North-South through the site on a new 100'-0" city right-of-way that will be re -opened between Burlington and Court streets. All grade -level entry points are indicated in the diagram below. The pedestrian and bicycle corridor between the structures (Capitol Street) — while not part of the building security plan, is also developed to provide maximum benefit and safety to those walking and bicycling the block. The design basis for this block will be similar to that of the new Washington Street streetscape in Page 1 1 Iowa City between Clinton and Linn streets. Pedestrian refuges, pinch -downs, visual screening, and lighting improvements provide a corridor which is safely designed for residents both inside and outside. There are twenty-six (26) total at -grade building access points as well as eight (8) entry points below grade from the parking garage — 2 per level, per side. _ . FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A WEST SIDE .. FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A EAST SIDE Overview of the ground floor entry -points demarcated. Page 1 2 AT -GRADE The primary access points to the buildings are located in each of the four (4) forecourts on the Capitol street side. These access points enter into vestibules and subsequently into lobbies for each building (5, 10, 17, 22.) The stairwells located near each lobby area include emergency egress doors which exit into the private courtyards which can then access the alleyways via secured one-way gates (4, 6, 9, 11, 23.) In the case of the NE tower, the egress door simply exits out onto the rear at -grade sidewalk on the East side of the building (19.) Commercial units and amenity areas are accessed at the multiple location points — some of these will be exit -only configurations (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26.) UNDERGROUND There are two garage access points located in public alleyways that lead to the underground parking structures. The West garage is accessed at the SW corner of the SW building (12) and the East garage is accessed near the East mid -point in the East alley (20.) The garage accesses will be double 10'-0" vehicle doors with an adjacent person -door. Within the garages there are secured access points into the North -most and South -most stairwells where building entrants can enter the building via the elevators or stairways. The NE stairwell and elevator will also access the proposed rooftop restaurant. III. SECURITY SYSTEMS 12EC will provide a robust security system to help establish safer and more secure living quarters and commercial spaces for all tenants. Our design team will accomplish this with a proactive rather than a reactive approach. Our design approach has been to create an environment that is tailored towards safety and an incredible living and learning environment. To accomplish this we have provided: ■ High quality lighting plans ■ Closed-circuit television systems ■ Intuitive, adaptable, and modern access controls ■ Adaptive alarm systems ■ 24-7 on site security and maintenance ■ Collaboration with University of Iowa and City personnel Lighting Strategy (DR300) Exterior lighting has been strategically placed to highlight the perimeter of the towers including building access points, private courtyards, forecourts, the primary pedestrian concourse, and even the rear public alleyways. The lighting plan will provide sufficient foot candles (FC) as required by the IECC and local codes - allowing for clear visibility throughout the site — without spilling beyond the perimeter into neighboring lots and streets. The exterior lights will be white -hue LEDs with an appropriate temperature Page 1 3 selection, that will operate via photocell activation (dawn -to -dusk.) These will act as a deterrent/security feature while providing adequate lighting for excellent video capture. Interior lighting will be arranged and designed with the same scrutiny as exterior lighting to create a well - lit, safe environment indoors. This will include common areas, shared hallways, lobbies, utility areas, amenity spaces, and underground parking facilities. These areas will provide 24/7 lighting to ensure proper monitoring via closed circuit television systems and keep areas of public traffic visible. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV] 12EC will be monitored 24/7 by CCTV cameras throughout the facility. This will include entry doors, vestibules, lobbies, amenity spaces, parking garages (360 -degree 2MP), common hallways (180 -degree 2MP)), forecourts, courtyards and controlled gate access points. Every exacgl/ision ingress and egress point to the building will be covered by video (single -point 3MP cameras.) Public areas will also be monitored along the building frontage with 1800 cameras that are able to view the central concourse, forecourts, courtyards, and commercial frontages. At this time we intent to use the ExacgVision system, Z -series Hybrid & IP Network Video Recorders or something equivalent. Exacq provides a large -capacity storage recorder which works in tandem with cloud -based uploading to allow for users to view footage anywhere using proprietary viewing software. It also includes a mobile app to allow for easy monitoring and data retrieval. The feed will be a continuous loop which will be viewable at the main security office as well as at each security kiosk. Security staff on site will have full time access to the live -feed video and will be able to monitor the video feeds 24/7. The combination of our conscientiously designed floor plans and strategical placement of cameras will create a complete coverage of the site and building. Electronic Access Control Electronic access controls will be provided via proximity pads throughout the site. All exterior access points for residential areas will be provided with this entry system. Residential occupants throughout the facility will be able to access the building through the four primary vestibule 1H35/90 SERIES locations in the forecourts. These locations will be locked and security -controlled HiH padded uildF.Mure/Many user 24-7 with only authorized residents having access privileges. The NE entry point _l 1, 0 will be a public entry point during normal operating hours as well as determined G . restaurant operating hours in the early evening. Outside of operating hours this ILLL P E n location will be locked and secured in the same fashion as the other three L ` forecourt locations. Page 1 4 The courtyard access points will be egress only and may not re-entered upon exit. Garage access points will be controlled via garage -door -openers, mobile apps, or access codes given only to residents and interior garage doors will be accessible via access panel the same as the forecourt entry points. Access points will be accessible via electronic security panels controlled by key -fobs, reader cards, smart phones or both. Door King high-rise systems are a similar system that has been used in the past and could be utilized on this project although priority may be given to something that is more smart -phone integrated and discourages the possibility of memorizing codes, or giving access out to non-residents. Door King's (DK) 1835/90 Series High Rise Building Telephone Entry/Access Control System (shown in Figure 2) provides digital access control devices such as keycard and fob readers to provide multi-user access into common spaces. There will be door -prop alarms at all building locations outside of the NE primary location and commercial unit entries. This fob and mobile app access system will be implemented on all Parking Garage and Level 1 entry points as detailed above. Residents' guests wishing to enter the facility shall only be able to enter by receiving access from a resident who is in proximity of the building either from a local access point (panel/pad) or via a smartphone app. Individual residential units will also be access controlled with only that units residents being able to access it. Adjustments to units based on move-in/move-out, expired leases, etc... will be able to be quickly and efficiently controlled by the building management of 12EC. Tight controls will be maintained for accessory areas such as the wellness facility, pool, study areas, and skywalk. Access to these areas will be restricted. Alarms Commercial tenants shall be responsible for providing and maintaining their own alarm systems. Primary and secondary entry doors to all residential areas at and below grade shall have alarm systems on them in case of forced entry. This alarm system shall ring to the 24-7 primary office/desk location as well as security kiosks in each building. These systems will ring to security who will then make a final determination whether to escalate the call to the authorities. These entry points will also include an extended -open alarm to prevent stuck doors or instances where tenants prop open doors and inadvertently leave them unattended. These systems will be triggered to alarm internally to the help desks after an extended period so that building security can respond. Individual residential units shall not have alarms but may install them upon management approval. On -Site 24/7 Management and Security Personnel The primary security, management, and maintenance office will be located on Level 1 in the Northeast building. This location will be professionally managed and staffed 24-7. This location shall have primarily Page 1 5 surveillance, entry, and alarm access to all areas of the entire facility with remote access to all of the security/management kiosks inside of the other three buildings. All locations shall be able to communicate with one another via an intercom system. IV. INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS Numerous security safeguards protecting information and technology systems will be present at 12 EC. Based on the type of occupancy, quantity of units, and scale of the building, the follow features are to be provided: Physical Security • All network server and IT equipment shall be in a locked and secured room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have fire extinguishers located within the room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have smoke detectors installed in room. • The network server and IT rooms shall operate on an uninterruptible power supply (UPS). • No food or beverages are to be allowed inside or around network server & IT rooms or enclosures. • When leaving and closing out secured areas, ensure all sensitive and confidential information is properly stored and not left in the open. Data Communications Security A firewall and security services shall be implemented for the communication between the 12EC public internet access and the general public and business patrons. Future innovations may allow for offsite integration of a number of these features. V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Building Management Responsibilities The main responsibility of the Building Management is to implement the provided security systems, properly utilize and monitor CCTV cameras, provide maintenance and upkeep of security systems, maintain a safer space for occupants, report incidents to local authorities where applicable, and record video for all monitored locations. To exercise the full capabilities of the surveillance and security systems implemented, a central on-site management/security desk will be staffed 24/7 and equipped with monitors tied into the CCTV cameras, providing continuous loop for surveillance of the site as well as the previously described building areas. Fob and mobile access will be periodically checked and managed. Necessary firmware and software updates will be provided to ensure the system is fully functionable and reliable. To help create a safe environment for building occupants, the management and security desk will be available to tenants 24/7. Page 1 6 Appropriate personnel will be sufficiently trained to use the video system per the final plan and design once the building is completed. Security personnel on site will be trained to manage the building but staff will only be as good as a call to ICPD. On site security will not be armed or trained to respond to active threats but will respond as quickly as possible to those events with calls to ICPD and direction to personnel who arrive as well as assistance with access to the areas in question. Tenant and Staff Responsibilities All leased tenants shall be required by their lease -contract to act in a responsible fashion with regard to their fellow building residents. Tenants, both residential and commercial, are expected to not prop doors open to prevent unauthorized personnel form entering the building. Residents are also expected to not allow anyone into the building that is not a guest and does not have individual access. Building occupants will be expected to report any incidents involving criminal activity to the building security and management desk. Emergency situations that involve a potential threat to human safety should be reported immediately by residents to the ICPD prior to notifying building management and security. VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES The main goal of 12 EC's security plan is to provide a proactive approach to public safety to prevent criminal activity from occurring instead of simply reacting to incidents that may transpire. This is accomplished not only by trying to identify smart integration of modern security systems but also by way of smart design and integration. Our project includes a number of well designed and integrated features to achieve these goals: ■ Smart layouts of floorplans with good sight lines and lighting levels ■ A well -constituted exterior lighting plan providing high quality LED lighting to vital exterior areas as well as lesser considered areas like the heavily -trafficked public alleyways behind the buildings. ■ Residential unit access controls tailored to individual residents and easily altered/adjusted by management. ■ Residential unit door design with solid -core frames in a swing -out configuration so that doors to residential units would be very difficult to break into compared to more typical apartment design. ■ Integration with City and University personnel to allow for review of final design and security considerations in order to provide good dissemination of information and a provision of lessons learned. Page 1 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES As part of this security plan, local emergency response personnel were contacted to determine expected emergency response times. While not every entity was able to provide such times due to too many unknown variables, a number of information pieces were provided. With 12EC's central downtown location, the site is located within minutes of nearly every available emergency service. Iowa City's Fire Department (ICFD) is within an estimated four -minute response area. Once on-site, the ICFD has access to all sides of the site via primary streets and alleyways. The closest fire station to 12EC is ICFD First Station 1 Headquarters which is located at 20 South Gilbert Street. ICPD is located at the same location as ICFD and can generally respond quickly to this location. While specific response times can not be given due to a variety of factors, expectations are for generally quick and responsive requests for assistance. In addition, this security plan will be reviewed and coordinated with ICPD prior to full acceptance and implementation. University of Iowa Campus Security services are also located close to site — only 1 block away — directly adjacent to the North. ICPD will be given access to video and security data for issues of safety directly related to the building that would cause direct harm to the occupants or the building. The Owner intends to work with the ICPD as necessary to maintain a safe and secure environment and allow ICPD access to reasonable amounts of information per their ongoing requests. In much the same way that the dormitories work with calls from RA staff (or general residents) to public safety to events/active threats — the intent at our building will be for security staff (or residents) to call ICPD to respond to these events quickly and effectively. Emergency medical services (EMS) have reported to have a response time of under five -minutes in urban areas which include downtown Iowa City. To aid in the response procedure of EMS responses, personnel will have access to all sides of the site as well. The closet EMS service station is Johnson County Ambulance Services which is located on 808 South Dubuque Street. A University of Iowa Quick Care clinic is located only 2 blocks from the site on Clinton Street. Page 1 8 sit PR 1.. 1 , IOWA AVELn +� I I'. z J Jrll WASHINGTON ST Lr � COLLEGE STI B RLING ON ST 3 C URT 5 (f' / � ' HARRI ON ST UJ J � � z ) R 5 1 E LEGEND ® rRo,Err�ocanrn Y Ll1 vrvc snr x wa �. rVRIICSnFm lu I11K. []JIIf.ICARf 1 .F - TION 7 -� * l�HNSON COIINIf RMRIIIJNCE EMERGENCY SERVICES LOCATION MAP J M PRENTISS ST -7 WRIGH I I � LAFAY TTE ST * L j BENTO ST IOWA CITY, IA VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES To ensure security systems are working as intended, periodic testing of systems and equipment will be performed. Staff or security will perform periodic walk-throughs of the site to ensure proper function of access points, gate latching systems, and camera mounts. When staff confirms doors are able to latch properly, they will then assess the electronic access control at each building entry to check that doors are locked when closed, that they respond to the access fob, and that the door unlocks appropriately. While checking entry points, 12EC's surveillance systems will be analyzed to verify no objects are obstructing the view of the cameras. Staff or security will also verify the cameras are capable of overseeing the entire area intended to be monitored by said device and adjust accordingly. If an item is rendered inoperable, it Page 1 9 shall be addressed in a reasonable amount of time. Broken equipment shall be noted and repaired as necessary. The type of system 12EC will implement will provide complete and ongoing feedback loops as to the functioning of the system. All camera function will be available in real time and malfunctioning or broken cameras will be able to be identified immediately. Owner intends to keep the system operational and functional with ongoing minute by minute capability to verify alarm operation, video operation, and failsafes to ensure systemwide functionality. This system is designed to maximize capability without draining WiFi. Ongoing maintenance logs are not as necessary with a live -response system like this but annual inspections and maintenance run-throughs will be performed on the system per the requirements and recommendations of the manufacturer. Freeman Lock and Alarm/ATEC, who will install and maintain this system for the Owner has confirmed this is the typical protocol for these newer systems and they will be in charge of maintaining them at all times. Tenants shall also be responsible for reporting any observed defects in security access systems that affect building access points and tenant dwelling spaces. In the event a tenant requires maintenance involving their unit's access control, the tenant shall submit an emergency maintenance request to building management to resolve the issue. The Owner would like to be adaptable to issues and would like to work with the City and ICPD to change building protocols as time goes on and processes and amended towards Iowa City's larger buildings. "How does this building compare to other buildings?" will be critical and the Owner would like to keep security protocols at similar levels. Annual checks of systems should be a part of the annual check of ALL systems (e.g. fire alarms) and part of the overall annual building permit process. IX. SPECIAL EVENTS The primary special event expected at the 12EC facility will be move-in/move-out events. These events will primarily take place in the late May/early June and early August timeframes and, to a lesser degree, in mid December. Because of the large amount of residential units, all move-in/move-out events will be coordinated with the City to facilitate any allowed street closures and to apply for the required permits. In addition, emergency personnel will be notified that such events will be taking place in order to coordinate as necessary. It may be necessary during these times to temporarily adjust the security systems described herein for short periods of time. An additional security person patrolling at periodic high volume times such as these would be a possibility if requested by ICPD. The Owner would like to work with ICPD to determine what these times will be and will address and reformulate these processes based on the future and final design of the building. Page 1 10 Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 12 of 29 Parsons moved the Commission approve ZCA19-06 an application submitted by Phil O'Brien requesting an amendment to the zoning code to allow animal related commercial uses in the Commercial Highway (CH -1) zone to allow for the development of a community based indoor dog park and recreation center at 2513 North Dodge Street. Signs seconded the motion. Hensch stated he thinks it's overly prescriptive, but he really wants this to pass, so maybe that is a conversation for a future date to address the 400 -foot separation from residential. He will not argue about that today as he likes this and hopes it's wildly successful and will support it. Signs noted he is excited to see potentially see something going in on that piece of property, it will really help that corner and it's a difficult spot. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CASE NO. DRC19-04: Applicant: Rob Decker, Axiom Consultants Location: 12 E. Court Street An application submitted by Rob Decker requesting a Level II design review, which includes a 7 - story bonus height request, for two, 15 -story buildings located at 12 E. Court Street. Russett began the staff report showing an aerial map showing the location of the project site Just south of Burlington, in between Clinton Street to the east and Madison Street to the west. As an overview of this application, again it is a Level II height bonus request, which requires review by the staff Form -Based Code Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission in this case, which is not typical, these typically go from the Form -Based Code Committee straight to City Council, but in this instance, it must be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Form -Based Code Committee includes Russett, Danielle Stitzman, development services coordinator and Tim Hennes, senior building inspector, and they have reviewed this plan and are also here tonight to answer questions. They determined that the project meets the standards of the zoning code. The height bonus request is a discretionary process and there's specific criteria that must be met and can help and guide decision making. Although the project meets the letter of the Code staff does have some concerns with the project, one being the proposed skywalk, the second being fully screened balconies, and the third is the design of the Capitol Street right- of-way which Russett will elaborate on later in the presentation. Some history on the project, this property was rezoned to Riverfront Crossings South Downtown in September 2018. There were several conditions associated with this rezoning and Russett wants to highlight a couple of them. First is the dedication of the Capitol Street right-of-way and second is that if a Level II Design Review was required for a bonus height request that it must come back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a recommendation to City Council. An overview of the bonus height request, the applicant has requested seven stories of bonus height for two 15 story mixed-use buildings. The bonus maximum height in this zone is 15 stories Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 13 of 29 subject to a discretionary review. The applicant has requested bonus height through three different means, the first is the transfer of public right-of-way, the second is the historic preservation height transfer, and the third is for student housing. Russett showed the site plan. Capitol Street runs between the two buildings, there is a west building and east building. She began with an overview of the west building. It is proposed to have 492 dwelling units. There are three levels of underground parking. The non-residential uses would be along Capitol Street, Court Street and Burlington Street. Russett showed an image of the proposed elevation from Capitol Street looking west, and a couple of renderings that show some of the courtyard spaces. Next, she showed a map of the first level floor plan. The blue areas are residential uses, the green areas are amenity spaces and recreational spaces, the orange areas are office and then the yellow is retail. There are some residential uses that front the courtyard on the first level, the amenity space is the study areas along Capitol Street and then there's some recreational and amenities along Burlington Street. There is retail proposed at the northeast corner of Capitol Street and Burlington and also at the southern end along Court Street and Capitol Street. The proposed office space is on the Court Street side. The academic spaces are to include study rooms and computer labs with Wi Fi and the recreational amenities include a half basketball court, track, jacuzzi area and an outdoor pool deck. In the image that shows the proposed open space the blue areas are the publicly accessible open space and the green areas are privately accessible open space. For the west building around 9,500 square feet of open space is required and the plans show just over 15,000 square feet. Moving on to the east building, it has 426 dwelling units proposed, three levels of underground parking. Again, the non-residential uses are along Capitol Street, Court Street and Burlington Street. Russett showed the first level floor plan for the east building. Again, the orange area is offices, the green areas are study spaces and amenity spaces, and then there's a small portion of retail at the corner of Capitol and Court Streets. There are no recreational uses proposed in the east building, there is a restaurant that's proposed on the 15th floor. The required open spaces for the east building 8,200 square feet and the plans show around 10,300 square feet of open space. In terms of proposed material, the applicant has proposed to use metal panels, terracotta spandrel and regular glass, metal screens and concrete. Russett brought down the sample board the applicant provided for the Commission to take a look at. Russett also noted that along the first floor of Capitol Street, the applicant has proposed an artistic component in the form of a graphic panel behind metal screens near building entrances. She showed a rendering illustrating the metal screen with plantings growing up them and then the lighted graphic panels in the back. The applicant also proposed a skywalk which connects the two buildings at the fourth floor. The proposed Capitol Street right-of-way shows 12 1/2 foot unobstructed walkways, 12 1/2 foot travel lanes and angled parking. Next Russett explained the criteria for each height bonus request. First, the public right-of-way transfer. The criterion related to the public right-of-way transfer is that the land proposed for dedication, which could be called the sending site, is needed in order to construct or improve rights-of-way necessary to realize the vision of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. The applicant has agreed to dedicate the public right-of-way to extend Capitol Street, that was a Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 14 of 29 condition of the rezoning and this extension is envisioned in the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. The applicant has requested to transfer 304,000 square feet of right-of-way to the buildings. Staff does have concerns with the design of the Capitol Street right-of-way. First, staff recommends that the angled parking be changed to parallel parking. Although there are no bicycle facilities proposed along Capitol Street it will be used by cyclists and angled parking is not the best type of parking to have with cyclists. In addition, the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan shows parallel parking in this location. Additionally, the travel lanes proposed are 12 '/2 feet wide, which are wider than would be supported by the City and do not align with current City designs like the recent reconstruction of Washington Street. The sidewalks on Washington Street are also wider than the proposed 12 '/2 feet along Capitol and staff anticipate this to be highly traveled corridor especially by pedestrians. In terms of the proposed skywalk, staff concerns are that the skywalk could block the views of the Old Capitol and could potentially divert street level activity. Next is the historic preservation transfer. The criterion related to this transfer request is that the site from which the height transfers requested, the sending site, is designated as an Iowa City landmark. The Tate Arms is designated as an Iowa City historic landmark, this was designated several years ago by the applicant. The applicant previously transferred a portion of the development potential of the Tate Arms to an adjacent property and agreed to a rehabilitation plan as part of that. The current request is to transfer the remaining potential of the Tate Arms building, which is 27,400 square feet to 12 East Court. Next is the student housing bonus height request. There are two sets of criteria for this request, first is the locational criteria. The project must be located within the University, South Downtown or West Riverfront Subdistrict and be located within 1,000 feet walking distance from the University of Iowa campus. Russet confirmed the proposed project meets both of those criteria. The next set of criteria are related to management design and amenities. This includes an enforcement plan for professional 24-hour on-site management and security. Open space must be provided within amenities that create a high-quality living environment for students and secure bicycle parking. Russett reiterated this project meets the location criteria, it also demonstrates compliance with the number of on-site bicycle parking that's required. Staff would recommend transparent fencing around the bike parking within the parking garages for safety reasons. Mentioned in the staff report, the City has reviewed the security plan however more detail is needed. Staff recommends that a final administrative review and approval of the management plan take place at a later date so staff can confirm various things such as confirmation of camera coverage, protocols for police department accessing videos, protocols for timely repairs as well as staffing requirements. Russett noted the plan lacks detail on how the student amenity spaces creates a high-quality living environment. Therefore staff is recommending some additional justification on those student amenity spaces to ensure that they are the right type, the right size and right amount based on the size of the building. Lastly, the applicant has proposed fully screened balconies, staff recognize that the screening is provided for safety reasons but have concerns that the screening could take away from the quality of the design. Russett stated there are several rezoning conditions that had to be reviewed as part of the development plan. The first condition is that the property must substantially conform to the building footprint shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Russett showed an image comparing the Master Plan and the proposed building. The applicant's plans Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 15 of 29 show 5% more linear feet along exterior walls and 4.8% more square feet than the Master Plan. but staff feels that this condition has been met. Russett pointed out the Master Plan originally is showing four buildings and the proposed project is two buildings. The next condition is that the development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Russet acknowledged the plans show an interior courtyard extending from Capitol Street to the alley between the east building and the Voxman Music Building, so this condition has been met. The last condition is the bonus height shall demonstrate excellence and building and site design, use high quality building materials and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. This is not only a condition but also a standard within the Form -Based Code to review the height bonus, Russett mentioned the materials earlier but noted there are extensive window and door openings that show that the project meets the fenestration requirements of the Code. All entrances to non-residential uses along Burlington, Court and Capitol Streets are at grade, helping to create a more walkable environment. The step backs meet the 10 foot at the fifth story, and there's even deeper step backs closer to Court Street, and they narrow as you move north toward Burlington along Capitol Street. The proposed project is located between the Voxman Music Building on the east and an eight story residential project on the west and the Johnson County Courthouse to the south. The role of the Commission here is to review and make a recommendation to City Council on the proposed development. The Commission should use the criteria that staff has outlined here that the Form -Based Code Committee used. City Council will be using that same criteria. In terms of next steps, after the Commission makes a recommendation and the plans will be reviewed by City Council and the awarding of the bonus height is up to City Council. Russett stated the Form -Based Code Committee finds that the proposal meets the standards of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. Staff does recommend the following modifications and some additional details. 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re -design of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. An additional administrative review of the management plan that includes details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc. prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional detail and justification on the academic amenity space. 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. If the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, these changes must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. An example of a substantive change is a change to exterior building materials. Martin asked why staff want to remove the balconies or is staff recommending removing balconies or just not fully screening balconies. Russett replied the balconies are proposed to be fully screened but for safety reasons staff recommend that they be removed. Staff feels like the materials and the screening that are being proposed take away from the quality and design of the building. Martin asked why didn't staff renegotiate what that would look like rather than just take away balconies. Russett acknowledged they did some negotiation with the applicant and they have changed the materials however staff is still not comfortable with the proposed Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 16 of 29 materials and the balconies being fully screened with those materials. They've told the applicant the best option is to remove the balconies. Martin next asked why staff want the skywalks removed. Russett stated they were concerned as there's a view shed, an important view shed on Capitol Street to the Old Capitol, and with the opening of Capitol Street that will create that view shed that was once closed, and they are concerned that that skywalk will block the view of the Old Capitol. Additionally, staff want the activity in this area to be at the street level and with skywalks they were concerned it could divert potential retail or pedestrian activity from the street to the skywalks. Martin assumed the skywalks are for the residents. Parsons agreed noting especially since the recreational activities are all only in one of the buildings. Russett acknowledged the skywalk would be mainly used for the residents. Martin noted nothing was said about the airport flight path, so she assumes the height bonus is fine with the flight path. Russett confirmed that was correct. Dyer asked about the provision of affordable housing and what is the provision. Russett replied the applicant must meet the affordable housing requirement which is 10% affordable, either by fee -in -lieu or on site. She will defer to the applicant on more details of their plan. Hensch commented on the landscaped central courtyard and noted given the amount of physical structures around that and he is concerned that all that stuff will end up dying, and it would be wise to have a landscape architect to select species that have a chance of staying alive in there. Hensch stated that all the architecture philosophies now need to be very biophilic oriented and need to be pretty intentional about the selection of that landscaping. He would like to put a stipulation above to have a landscape architect signing off on this to make sure there will be plants that can survive in that environment and are native Iowa so they can handle the cold and the drought and the heat because it's going to be a really tough environment. Hensch stated regarding the balconies, he is a big balcony fan, the 19 -story building across street has 19 balconies, but he can see staff's concern about the screening making it look too institutional so will defer to staff. However regarding the skywalk, the renderings have it to be pretty transparent so if there's a skywalk that people can see through it won't really interfere with the view. Additionally, this is Iowa and it would be nice for people to be able to move between buildings. Baker noted on page seven of the staff report he needs more clarification on that phrase "divert from street level activities". A skywalk to go from one building to another or a skywalk concept in general makes perfect sense to him. Baker asked about the parking changes staff proposes, from angle to parallel, he assumes all those spaces will be metered regardless. Russett acknowledged she doesn't know the answer to that and would have to look into it. On security, Baker notes a phrase on page eight where "staff recommends at least three security personnel providing security 24/7" and wondered if that means literally one person, eight hour shifts, seven days a week, just three people for that entire complex or does that mean nine people, three on each shift. Russett stated it means three people on site at all times. Baker Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 17 of 29 noted the paragraph right below that talking about the plan lacks detail on how this amenity, the academic community space, creates a high-quality living environment, and wondered who's involved in judging it as an academic space, or high-quality. Is it just a staff decision or will they bring in people from the University, who's making the decision about what really qualifies as academic amenity space? Russett stated it would be the Form -Based Code Committee that would be reviewing it. Baker asked if there any University representation on that committee and Russett replied no. Baker feels there should be someone with experience to evaluate academic amenity space and that is not on staff right now. Hekteon stated that is part of the applicants burden and one way that they could support their application is by bringing in evidence supporting the University's practices or something of that nature. Baker also wanted to address the question of balconies again, he has mixed feelings about balconies in general for large developments, he understands why the developer would want them, they are an amenity that people like to have, but is staff's concern only over how they look, an aesthetic question. Russett replied staff wouldn't want them to have the balconies without screening because of the fact that it's student housing and do recognize that they're proposing the screening for safety reasons. Staff is recommending the balconies just be removed. Baker asked if the Commission or the Council says if they can have balconies would they have to be 100% enclosed or perhaps just waist high or such. Russett stated if Council chooses to allow balconies staff would recommend that they were fully screened, 100% screened. Staff has gotten feedback from the Police Department based on their review of the plans, they had lots of concerns with balconies, and they would need to be screened completely. Baker noted in the latest planning magazine that they get every month as Commission members, this month it was on the City of Houston and there's all sorts of designs in there about high rises in Houston and balconies and high rises, and they're not enclosed balconies at all. Baker asked if the concern here that we're dealing with a student population. Russett confirmed that was the concern. Baker asked then how that is concern different than on a 10 -story building versus a three- or four-story building, which has a balcony which is only half enclosed, if a person falls off the three story it can be just as tragic. Russett stated that the difference here is that this is a discretionary review process for a height bonus, and they have concerns with the proposed to balconies. Beyond safety there is a concern about noise and trash, things getting thrown off the balconies, that type of thing. Baker acknowledged then if is the staff recommendation that under no circumstances would they support the inclusion of balconies that were not fully enclosed. Russett reiterated their recommendation is removing the balconies. Baker concurs and would prefer they be removed too, he likes balconies but aesthetically for buildings that size he can see where a design with no balcony having all that balcony space included back into the apartment itself would be would be an advantage as well for the for the developer. Townsend asked after these buildings are completed and after students move in, how long are these plans in place such as the security. Russett said it is in perpetuity. Townsend also noted the buildings are right next door to the University Rec Center so why are all these things included in this building, students pay for those amenities with their Ubills. Russett stated the applicant could address that. Signs asked if the open space calculations are all ground level square footage. Russett confirmed it is, it's the courtyards. Signs interpreted the comments about the amenities as staff thought there were too many amenities in the in the building and wondered what's the reasoning behind that. Russett replied that wasn't the intent, in reviewing the plans, the Form -Based Code Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 18 of 29 Committee didn't have a good idea of how many student study rooms and spaces should be in a building of this size, so they wanted more information from the applicant to justify the square footage, the types of amenities, the computer labs, those types of things that are being proposed. Signs also asked for clarification on staff's thoughts on the size of the sidewalks proposed on Capitol and Court Streets. Russett stated the travel lanes are too wide, the street width. Townsend noted the width of the sidewalks were mentioned in the report. Russett reiterated that the sidewalks on Washington Street are much wider than what is currently proposed along Capitol Street. Baker had one final question about balconies and asked if there are any sort of record of problems with the current balconies in Iowa City, people hurting themselves through balconies now. Russett said the Police Department could probably provide some information on that. Hensch presumes it's more associated with noise generation and people throwing things. Hekteon reiterated what Russett said that this recommendation was informed in large part by input from the Police Department. Townsend voiced a concern of having two 15 -story buildings in that area. It will tower over Voxman, it's going to be taller than the engineering building. Hensch noted when the applicants here they can ask them but noted the elevations are going to be different due to the topical map of the area. Hensch opened the public hearing. Rob Decker (Axiom Consultants) is the project manager for this project and will try to expand on what was presented by staff and then be happy to answer any questions. He began noting he appreciates all the effort that staff has provided them with over this long process, next month will be two years that they've been working on this effort. They understand it's gigantic and there's a lot to digest here. Decker start by showing a video that gives a really good example of the project. Then he will go into a couple of clarification items and go through the building as a whole. Decker next read a prepared statement because this project is so big he wanted to write his thoughts down so nothing got missed. "On behalf of the ownership group and the design team, I want to thank you for the opportunity to talk briefly about this project. I don't want to stand up here for an incredibly long time and I don't intend to, together with Newman Monson we'll give you a rundown of what you're going to see with all the design that this entails. It's incredibly large and while many of us on the team have the benefit of this being second nature at this point, after these many months, we understand that there's an incredible amount to digest. We're incredibly excited about being on the project. It's a really, really unique opportunity to transform this area. This is my hometown, so I'm excited about it. I think it's a game changer for the City. Very few if any private properties present so unique and opportunity is to be essentially on campus while providing private residential opportunities of incredibly high quality that allow for a student experience in such a proximity, walkability, incredible amenities, urban design and more. Not only is what you saw something that would change the landscape of Iowa City for the better, in our opinion, it brings an incredible host of benefits, including an estimated $3 to $4 million Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 19 of 29 annually into Iowa City coffers in the form of property taxes, an estimated $9 million into the affordable housing fund. A reopening of the long -closed Capitol Street with is described as one of the axial entry points to the Old Capitol, its last remaining one of the four. It provides incredibly high-quality safe housing for the students on campus, literally just south of downtown closer than most of the dorms. It makes sense, it fits the site, the height is partially offset by the steep grade of the hill, so it gobbles up a lot of the height. It's less than or equally as tall as high rises that are already in town. It replaces outdated infrastructure, puts a newer building and a new energy code into place in a town that benefits tremendously from that. The impermeable area of the site is nearly the same as what currently sits there with a much higher urban density, density that's called for in the City's Master Plan as well as other student housing studies completed in town. Our analysis of the current market rates and other analyses recently released assume less than 3% downtown vacancy and around 6% in the metro area, which is an incredibly healthy level. In discussions with our colleagues in the industry and from other accounts supplied by Housing and Urban Development arguments can often be made that healthy levels nationally should sit around 8% to 10%. Iowa City within the past decade or so has experienced incredibly low vacancy rates below 1 % downtown. Obviously, these levels aren't sustainable and that's why a number of housing projects have popped up and continue to pop up. The analysis that developers are looking at are still showing really excellent opportunities in town and that's why you continue to see these projects, they wouldn't be completing these projects if it wasn't fiscally sound opinion. And the last thing I would say is, besides making sense for the reasons above, it's been very well received. We've received positive reinforcement or outright support from affordable housing programs, most of them, the local unions, the Downtown Association, countless local contractors and businesses, and numerous members of the general public that I've spoken with and best of all the projects being completed locally. The owners are lifetime residents of Iowa City and a family that made their whole life here. The design teams are Iowa City firms, the general contractors is an Iowa City firm, McComas Lacina that has a wonderful reputation downtown and has been here for decades. The entire team on this project is Iowa City based, you'll never find a project this big that's going to do that again, I guarantee it. And lastly, that project will push an estimated 2 million hours of full-time labor into the economy during it if not more than that, it's probably a low estimate. Their process to get here is basically been nine months of rezoning, nine months of design review of City staff which has been great, Planning and Zoning right now and we're going to move to Council next, as you're all aware, that'll be a two year process next month." Decker next went through the requirements from Zoning that staff went through. (1) Dedication of Capitol Street right-of-way, that's being done, it was agreed to in the CZA, it is a 100 -foot right- of-way that's been blocked since the 1970s and it will open up the axial view to the Old Capitol that is envisioned in the Master Plan. (2) Obtain approval of elevations from Planning and Zoning, that's why they're here tonight. (3) Build the Capitol Street right -for -way to City specifications which they have. One of the things Decker wanted to clarify is that's been vetted heavily with the City already, the vast majority of it meets expectations. The lane width can easily be changed to what the City wants. However, Decker does feel strongly about the angle parking and will address that later. (4) The satisfaction of affordable housing was addressed in a formal memo, they will agree to pay the fee in lieu of to The Affordable Housing Coalition, its near $9 million into the fund. (5) The compliance with the footprint in the Master Plan was shown in a good example earlier. (6) Development of landscaped interior courtyards has been reviewed extensively with staff as well. Decker will read one more prepared statement from their landscape architect, which describes the landscape architecture that they've designed to date. (7) Approval of the architect, that was completed a long time ago and lastly, (8) demonstrating Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 20 of 29 excellence in design for the building and the site. Decker will do a general walkthrough of the site and try to clarify some things. There's sort of a central concourse, or courtyard, but it's more of a concourse that runs between the buildings. One could debate on whether this is four or two buildings, by code it's two buildings because they're connected, but they're designed to feel independent, and that's to meet with the Master Plan. The forecourts are entry points into each of those four facilities. Each one of them, with the exception of the northeast one, has a has a private courtyard that can only be accessed by private residents of the buildings. Voxman doesn't allow for one in that northeast corner. There are parking garages under each structure that are independent of one another, they span the length of each of those footprints. There are two entry points to the garages. The right-of-way is 100 -feet which is really large, there aren't many places in town large, but it matches through the corridor. In addition to the really large setbacks that they've done, it provides what they think is a really bright and open corridor north to south. Decker next read the landscape architecture prepared statement. "An important piece of this project has been the carefully planned landscape features intended to create a beautiful space for pedestrians, motorists and users of the building. Plants, paving materials and other site features were selected to complement existing nearby streetscapes, to provide a seamless transition along east Burlington and east Court Street. South Capitol Street will be lined with trees framing the views of the Old Capitol building to the north, overstory trees will shade proposed parking and complement the surrounding buildings. The resulting tree canopy is intended to create a comfortable pedestrian experience along with the large beds of ornamental grasses, paralleling the generous walkway connecting adjacent spaces. Throughout the site unique planting beds reflect the architectural details of the building, as well the proposed colored concrete accents. Public entrances with seating will be enhanced with the use of ornamental trees, flowering shrubs and a mix of perennials integrated into the surrounding streetscape with perennial beds that wrap around the building. Some entrances are screened by living wall which will create more vertical green infrastructure in an urban environment. A courtyard space between the buildings will be flanked with vegetation and ornamental trees to create a strong access while softening the hardscape. The addition of colorful public art opportunity, varied seating types and accent lighting will create a living environment around the building." Nathan Griffith (Architect, Newman Monson) wanted to speak about the three major goals for the project. One goal is that the project is designed to contribute to the quality and the character of the neighborhood. He will talk about that and speak to that as shows some of the images. Second critical to the project is the student health, safety and welfare and that will be addressed in many different ways throughout the project, including the balconies as well as the skywalk. Third goal is the enhanced pedestrian environment. First Griffith showed an image comparison of the Master Plan footprint and the proposed footprint and pointed out a few different critical parts. One is the pedestrian experience along the street. On their plan one can see how much frontage at ground level the building will have as compared to what was proposed in the Master Plan, and with that they were able to obtain goal one by creating the forecourts and courtyards and a more friendly pedestrian experience as you're walking along the street. Another point is the step back of the buildings as compared to the Master Plan footprint, at the north side of the site there is an additional 10 feet of stepback and the south tower is 15 feet to allow for more sunlight and access to sky. Thirdly, the towers as tight and efficient and spindly as possible so that it really reduces the scale of the building from Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 21 of 29 an urban sort of context. Next Griffith showed a few images showing the context of the project within the City and how the building is broken up into pieces and the way that the colors of the cladding start to allow the building to dissipate into the sky being a lighter color, rather than a darker color, which is very much in tune with the neighborhood. Voxman School of Music has the same material, terracotta cladding which has a light gloss to it, which will start to reflect in the sky and the surrounding environment. As one approaches from the west, the recesses of the building are much deeper than one might see on a building like the Rise and that matters a lot to how one experiences the project on the urban setting has been broken up into smaller components. Griffith pointed out they were very intentional and have the living spaces pointed away from the building per se as opposed to facing towards the courtyards. For instance, from across the front edge, the living space for the west building to the east building is 160 feet in distance and they thought that was critical to the safety and security of the students as they're living. Looking at the development from the south in the foreground would be an office space on the first floor, the materials are just a bit darker, which kind of grounds the building, but also a lot of glass striations along the facade, as well as many different recesses, including the forecourts, enhance the pedestrian experience on the street, and make it a friendly experience as you walk through. Next Griffith showed some images one would walk through the development as a pedestrian again noting the many, many plants and benches and sort of colored paving and things that will help make this place more friendly and engaged and give some depth and friendly experience to the pedestrians. He showed an image of the community space and potentially a classroom area where they could host lectures or informal gatherings. He then showed the forecourt areas, re- emphasizing some of those design characteristics of the way that forecourt is designed to engage the building and becomes more friendly. Some of the elements are the dark paving with the light paving, aligning with the building, colored plantings and things. He showed the connection over on both the west building and the east building and where that connection starts. The connection is 40 feet off the ground, it's the height of a four-story house. The width of that space is 48 feet wide, and the depth of the soffit is 50 feet. Regarding nuts and bolts of the skywalk, it is at the fourth level of the project and set back from Burlington Street. They are very purposeful in the way that they are cladding the skywalk with transparent glass that can be seen through, but also in the way that it's structured so that it appears very spindly and skeletally and would then dissipate into the sky in the way that the colors might reflect the surroundings. They don't think that it impedes the view corridor of the Old Capitol. Griffith added it's worth noting the safety and security point of the skywalk and most of the amenities in the two buildings are in the west building so having access to those amenities is critically important to the success of the east building. Griffith next took a moment to talk about the balconies and showed an image, an example, of the type of material and the application on a residential project. The balconies will be 5 -foot by 15 - foot spaces which are very generous for balconies in Iowa City. The 15 -foot side has a perforated metal guardrail. He showed an example of this on a real building in Los Angeles. Without the balconies it will be a cold building. The material on the 5 -foot side of the balcony of t is a metal mesh guardrail and he showed an example of that product in Austin, Texas on a sky bridge that connects a couple residential buildings. With this material again they are trying to provide as transparent as possible, but keep the safety of the students as they're not able to throw things off or jump off or anything like that. The balconies provide a place to soften the Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 22 of 29 edges of the building and help reduce the scale, as well as providing for vertical lines that reduce the building beyond the larger 50 -foot recesses. He noted the access to light and air is critically important to the student's health in this development, and just being able to go outside and get some fresh air contributes to the success of the project. Students/tenants having access to light and air and just being able to step outside and get some fresh air enhances their experience and their likelihood to rent here and the success of the project. Decker noted that they are not here to disagree or to fight with City staff, he respects their opinions, as again noted they've been great to work with, but they obviously have their own opinions on the project. The reason that the angle parking is important them and the reason that this is different than Washington Street is it is not a street lined with businesses, it's a housing project. It does have a few scattered offices and businesses on it and therefore those additional 20 parking stalls are incredibly critical to the success of those few businesses that are going to be there. The project already has a very small amount of parking for how substantial it is and they don't feel like it detracts from the Capitol Street corridor. With regards to the skywalk it is important for safety at all hours, safety during any kind of weather, to get from one building to the other. A resident should have access to all the amenities if they pay rent there. They shouldn't have to go down into a tunnel in the garages, which would be an incredible safety issue even with cameras and the alternative is they walk outside or there are amenities on both sides, which is not feasible. The better opportunity is to have a set of amenities for the complex that people can access and that is why they want the skywalk. Lastly, Decker said the balconies are probably the biggest issue for them. Beyond the health and fresh air benefits they disagree that they're displeasing visually and think they help break up the facade in ways that help it correspond with the code and softens those corners. With such a big building softening the corners makes a big impact. Additionally, nearly all of the other high-rise and mid -rise buildings in town have balconies. They spent a lot of time working with staff on the materials and look of the balconies, they also spent a lot of time with ICPD and met with them three different times to talk about these balconies. They've heard what people have said, and they've adjusted things to try and get what they want to have on the buildings but in the way that makes sense and meets as many of those boxes as they can. Lastly, leaving them off could make the building functionally obsolete. This building is going to be around for 100 or more years. Yes, it's intended for students now but it might not always be for students. Student populations may decline, they may increase, at some point the upper floors may not be students, the upper floors may be professionals, they may be retirees, the building may convert to retirees down the road, they don't know. Leaving off those balconies is something that can never be corrected. Griffith addressed the amenities and how they came to the amount of academic and recreation spaces in the building. The owner has gone way beyond necessary to achieve a successful project and they did a comparison of the study spaces and academic spaces of this project with the Rise as a comparison example of a project near this one, and this project has per bedroom twice the amount of area of academically oriented spaces. And not only that, but those spaces are spread throughout the building, on each floor, there's a study space, which is not anywhere else in Iowa City. Baker asked about the amenities and if that was the case they made to the staff and the staff has said that's not clear. Griffith stated that's a recent study that they had done so this may be the first time everybody's hearing this. Hensch noted the skywalk that will be built, if approved, will be transparent and that is the Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 23 of 29 intention, not just a rendering. Decker confirmed noting if they vary substantially from the renderings they need to ask Council for permission or changes. Hensch asked an elevation question in what the change in elevation from Madison Street to the west wall of the Voxman building is. Decker said the elevation change across the site is a difference of 30 feet. Just by appearance wise it's really going to look more like a 11 or 12 story building rather than 15 stories and be lower than Hilton Garden Inn. The top of the flagpole of the courthouse is very similar to the height of this building. Hensch thanked him for reading the statement from the landscape architect. He noted however historically they see lots of really good drawings and then when it's actually implemented all those plantings and trees and grasses suddenly aren't there, or they're dead the first year and they never get replaced. Signs noted a lot of the images show a lot of colorful artwork is committed and will be there. Griffith noted the artwork is conceptual, they are not seeking additional height for artwork, which can be done. The City wants a really engaged experience with this building and artwork is one opportunity to do that. That's something that would have to be vetted but it would enhance the building. Signs agrees that it enhances the building and would be very disappointed if it wasn't there when it was done and makes a big difference on how he looks at this entire project. Martin commented that earlier in the presentation they said there were these sorts of murals in the project and wanted them to confirm that was their intention. Griffith confirmed. Martin asked for clarification having heard a couple of different words such as private residence and student housing and to her those mean different things and what is the current vision for who's living there and how they're living there. Decker replied it's not a dorm, so it's a private student residence. They expect mainly upperclassmen who want to stay downtown. Martin asked if people other than students can live in the facility and Decker confirmed anyone can live there, not just students. Yes the intent is students but if 200 people come and ask if they can live at the top of it that certainly could be a possibility and then making the upper stories have a different look to them. Martin then asked about the security. Decker noted the security plan is complicated and they've gone through it with City staff numerous times, it's not finalized but will be finalized as part of the process. Martin did note she would hate to see that project without balconies. Hensch asked about the step back issue and if there were going to be two step backs, or just one step back. Griffith replied just one step back. Hensch asked at what height. He added that will affect how the balconies above that appear. Griffith said the step back is at the 4th story and because of the slope of the site, the stepback is anywhere from 30 to 50 feet up and also those setbacks are different, they're skinny up on the north side and they're back down below. Martin did note she would hate to see that project without balconies, asked based on the picture they showed if someone fall out of that balcony. Decker noted people have asked him this and the truth is someone could take a chair and shatter a window easier than break through that Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 24 of 29 metal. Martin again reiterated she is not concerned. Dyer noted being a retired professor, she noticed the community space spaces on the upper levels are smaller than her living room for 30 apartments, that seems inadequate, and there are no lounges like there are in dorms for gatherings other than studying. The other thing she thought of that doesn't seem adequate is all the fancy recreation places, there are no restrooms or locker rooms and going around the track for half an hour, one might need to use a bathroom. It just seems inadequate in in that respect. Another thing that disturbs her a great deal is making affordable living in lieu of the buildings that are on this site, a relatively affordable housing close to campus and replacing affordable housing close to campus with luxury residential housing close to campus, and wherever those $9 million dollars are going to go with someplace else farther from campus. The City is trying to integrate affordable housing within the community, scattered throughout the community and this is a monstrous project closing out affordable living. The last thing that bothers her a lot is blocking the light from the offices in Voxman Music Building. It's going to have a blank wall they are looking at and that is not neighborly. Dyer said for those reasons she is going to vote no. Decker addressed the question on size of the study spaces on the floors. As already mentioned they have way more than any other building of this size. a lot more than approved buildings in town. Additionally there are a lot of very large spaces on the ground floor, that was that was done intentionally because the engagement with the pedestrian experience in a building that doesn't require any commercial space on the ground floor, it could be residential all the way up, is incredibly important and they felt like those spaces will be were students are engaged. It is not a dorm, it's a private residence but it's also important to the City that they have that type of engagement. They feel it is a better project than having large spaces up above. With regards to the affordable housing comment, the units that are going to be there, he would not call these luxury or that this is going to go into any kind of luxury. The units there now, the Pentacrest Garden Apartments are not the cheapest apartments, they are not affordable housing. The inventory that's there and the inventory that's going to go there are not that much different in terms of rent, but the units and amenities will be so much better. In terms of paying the fee in lieu of was because City Council was very interested in seeing the fee in lieu of, they didn't see that this project is a great place for the application of an affordable housing. It is not a location for a family looking for affordable housing. Voxman in terms of shadow, the majority of that side of the building is not offices and that's not where most of the windows and engagement are. It also won't be in shadow until midday through late in the evening. That's what the loading dock is, that's where the backdoors to most of the area go. He acknowledged there are some windows on that side of the Voxman Building but stated one can't put up a project like this without impeding on something. In terms of the bathrooms and the amenities there Griffith stated the spaces will have bathrooms. Griffith also mentioned they did a study of the way the windows align with the Voxman Building and did what they could to misalign them so that no one is looking right into an office or a person in the office is not looking right into a living room. Townsend noted looking at the floor plans for the spaces and wondered what the differences are in square feet from the efficiencies to the three bedrooms and why the efficiencies are kind of tucked in between. Griffith said on the fourth level area the efficiency units are 254 square feet and the three-bedroom areas are 963 square feet. Townsend asked how many elevators are in Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 25 of 29 each building. Griffith replied there are four elevators in the west building and five elevators in the east building, one of the elevators in the east building will serve the restaurant. Additionally there are two staircases in the west building and three staircases in the east building. The building has been designed to meet all egress codes and will be reviewed when they get the building permit. Baker asked if regarding the balcony question, was the total enclosure the original plan or was that an accommodation to a concern raised by the staff? Decker replied they originally proposed open balconies but are okay with the totally enclosed concept now. Baker noted his concern is he can't visualize that on a giant building will look, that's just a leap of faith. Martin asked if it is similar to some of the ones at Vetro. Griffith noted it is the same material. Townsend asked about the student height bonus if other people are going to be living there as well. Decker said to get the height bonus is half a floor of the whole project. The Capitol Street transfer is all but one floor, there's enough square footage in the 304,000 square feet to go from 8 to 14. The last sliver is a combination of historical transfer from the Tate Arms and student housing. Baker noted he has no problem with the height and overall design of this project and hated the buildings that were there now. This is a dramatic improvement over what's there in a lot of ways for the City. His question is on the skywalk, it seems like a missed opportunity. It is such a visible part from the public point of view and seems like a missed opportunity on some sort of design that sets it apart with artistic contributions. Baker feels somebody needs to take that concept and create something original for that space and accomplish the same purpose. It's such a significant visual part of the project that is not really taking advantage of the opportunity. Decker added quickly that in regards to University engagement, he met with Rod Lehnertz and David Keft on this three or four different times, they're very aware of what is happening and have been supportive of it. The other person they met with was Melissa Shivers, Director of Student Engagement, to get her input in terms of security, how students are being treated, what their lessons learned are from dorms, all those good pieces and try to integrate as much of that as they can into their design. Bill Gearhart (President, State Building Construction Trades Council) and has been a resident of Iowa City since 1969. He has seen a lot of changes. The Building Trades Council is an umbrella organization for the 16 different craft unions that perform construction work. They are excited about this project, it's big, its bold, it goes up instead of sprawls and it replaces a bunch of outdated apartment houses that are there now. This is going to be a big improvement and going to be a lot of jobs for a lot of construction workers. 2 million -man hours is an awful lot of paychecks for skilled trades people and their selection of a general contractor that's local and does quality work, is going to be really good for the building, for the building trades, and for our city. So they are in complete support of this project. Hensch closed the public hearing. Parsons moved the Commission approved DRC19-04, an application submitted by Rob Decker requesting a Level 11 design review which includes a 7 -story height bonus request Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 26 of 29 for two 15 -story buildings located at 12 East Court Street including the seven staff recommendations. Signs seconded the motion. Hensch stated he is always super supportive of staff, but he happens to disagree with them this time about the removal of the skywalk. A transparent skywalk would not obstruct the view, this is Iowa with terrible weather and it's integral to this project. Hensch noted he is a big fan of skywalks, the skywalk between the County Administration Building and the Health and Human Services Building was just a brilliant idea, he uses it every day. He has mixed feelings about the balconies, he purposely drove around buildings around town to look at balconies today and noted that on the Chauncy all 19 stories has balconies. He can understand the police department's concern with younger persons and their behavior sometimes, but it would be unfortunate to not have them. Hensch noted feeling much better about the landscaping after hearing the statement from the architect. Martin also notes she has been in Iowa City her entire life, born here, and loves the idea of so much happening that is so Iowa City centric, the people that are involved, the building, workers, that's very important stuff. She thinks a skywalk is very cool and liked Baker's idea of something fun with this skywalk such as shown in the picture of something in Houston that had a swanky skywalk. Martin also stated she loves a balcony, she sells a lot of real estate and people love an outdoor space, no matter in what form. She also really likes the art piece, more art the better. Signs stated he is in agreement with both the skywalk and the balconies, he thinks the skywalk is an added positive note to this project. As one is driving up the hill, they may lose a 10 second view of the Old Capitol but that is not a huge problem. The fact they've made such a broad streetscape and really opened up that area makes a better view. Signs noted he would be in favor of taking out the recommendation to remove the skywalk. Additionally he feels the balconies are important. What concerns him the most is noise, but that is present in almost any student housing situation and they are used to it whether it's right good, bad, right or wrong. He is personally am not a huge fan of the color scheme but will note let that sway his decision. He is totally in favor of allowing balconies as long as they are screened and protected so that people aren't throwing things off the 15th floor and doing things like that. He does feel the look is extremely monolithic and was hoping to see some rooftop terraces and some variation in height but overall they've done enough other nice things that he can live with. He is inclined to vote in favor after they remove the skywalk and balcony removals. He also really wants to emphasize how important artwork is to the beauty and character of the project. Finally, he hopes the landscaping plan does work well and is maintained well as they say it will be. Parsons stated he is also in favor of removing staff recommendations one and three and feel others have summarized his opinions as well. He does really hope that the developers follow through with the artwork and landscaping because the ground floor is what people will see. He really impressed by the project and thinks it will be a great asset. Signs added one more comment, he doesn't have a problem with the angle parking, he thinks it adds to the width of the whole corridor there and would rather see 40 parking spaces over 20 because it is such a large project. Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 27 of 29 Baker noted he is very pleased with this project he has never been bothered by the height question considering the topography of the area. He did reiterate the design is a leap of faith, it looks good on paper, hopefully it will look like that in reality. Going back to the question of the skywalk. If there is going to be a skywalk, he'd like for the Commissioners to mandate that skywalk design go through some sort of design review process that requires a little bit more thought from the developer about what the thing will look like. In a sense it can be a form of public art and be functional at the same time. Regarding the balconies, he is not bothered by the balconies and experience has shown balconies are useful and not necessarily a dangerous part of any large project. He is not too thrilled about the total enclosure but if that's what the City and the developer can compromise on, that's fine too. He also has no problem with the angle parking. The academic community thing can be resolved one way or the other. Overall it's a vast improvement for the area. Dyer stated she thinks it would be good to remove the angle parking, it's a lot safer for bicyclists to not have angled parking and there are going to be a lot of bicycles in this building and it's not permitted to ride on the sidewalk downtown. Hensch agrees noting the most dangerous part of driving is backing up and if they can minimize people backing up they should do that. Martin commented as a bicyclist she likes angle parking better because she has been doored from parallel parking. Parsons moved to amend his motion on DRC19-04 to approve DRC19-04 with staff recommendations four through seven. Baker asked if there was any desire to make the skywalk go through some sort of design review process. Hensch noted the whole process will go through a design review. Hensch asked if Parsons wanted to include the angled parking recommendation in his motion (recommendation 2). Russett asked to clarify stating the issue is not just with the angled parking, it's also with the width of the travel lanes and width of the sidewalk as well. Hekteon stated ultimately that's going to be a City owned right-of-way so in terms of how it's designed, the City has significant more amount of control over that. Parsons moved to amend his motion on DRC19-04 to approve DRC19-04 with eliminating staff recommendations one and three. Signs seconded that amendment. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-2 (Dyer and Townsend dissenting). CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: DECEMBER 5, 2019 Signs moved to approve the meeting minutes of December 5, 2019. Townsend seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. Deferred to 2/18/20 Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA; (DRC19-04) Resolution No. A resolution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street in the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown Zone Whereas, in September 2018, the approximate 3.41 acres of property locally known as 12 E. Court Street and legally described as: ALL OF LOT 5, ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREO. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 ON BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF was rezoned to Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown (RFC -SD), subject to a conditional zoning agreement entered into by and between the City and the owner, 100-500, LLC, and recorded in the records of the Johnson County Recorder in Book 5835 Page 404411; and Whereas, the RFC -SD allows eight (8) story buildings, with the possibility of up to fifteen (15) stories through the use of one or more height bonus or transfer of development rights; and Whereas, in July 2019, the owner filed an application for a Level 11 Design Review for two (2) 15 -story buildings to be bifurcated by the rededication of Capitol Street, which is allowed only upon Council approval of seven (7) stories in height bonuses for each of the buildings and transfer of development rights in accordance with Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14 -2G -7G for the public right-of-way height transfers, historic preservation transfers, and student housing height bonus; and Whereas, in accordance with the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based code, any request for bonus height shall demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high-quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood; and Whereas, the request for the public right-of-way transfer is based upon the owners' willingness to dedicate some 304,000 square feet to the City to reestablish the Capitol Street right-of-way to and build it to specifications approved by the City Engineer, consistent with the above -referenced conditional zoning agreement; and Whereas, the extension of Capitol Street is envisioned in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and identified as a primary street on the regulating plan that was adopted as part of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code; and Whereas, the opening of Capitol Street will restore an important viewshed of the Old Capitol; and create a well-connected environment, reinforce the public realm network and provide areas of civic importance; and Whereas, the request for the historic preservation transfer arises from the historic preservation of the Tate Arms building at 914 S. Dubuque Street, zoned as a historic landmark by Ordinance 14-4599, recorded in Book 5395, Page 711-713, making it eligible as a "sending site" for a transfer of 34,800 square feet of development rights; and Whereas, Council previously approved a resolution authorizing the transfer of 7,400 square feet from the Tate Arms site to 201 E. Benton and 912 S. Dubuque Streets (Resolution 15-2); and Resolution No. Page 2 Whereas, owner now desires to transfer the remaining 27,400 square feet to its development at 12 E. Court Street; and Whereas, the owner supported the designation of the Tate Arms building as an Iowa City Historic Landmark and agreed to ensure the Tate Arms property will be preserved against decay, deterioration, and kept free from structural defects; and Whereas, based upon its adjacency to the University of Iowa campus, the owner has requested a height bonus for student housing, proposing approximately 1,700 bedrooms; and Whereas, to qualify for this height bonus, the project must be located within the University Subdistrict, South Downtown Subdistrict, or the West Riverfront Subdistrict and must be within one thousand feet (1,000') walking distance along public rights-of-way from the University of Iowa campus; and Whereas, this project is located within the South Downtown Subdistrict and is adjacent to the University's Voxman Building, across the street from the College of Education, and less than 1,000 feet from the Main Library, the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center, and numerous other campus buildings, making it ideal for student housing; and Whereas, to qualify for this height bonus, the project must be designed to provide a high- quality living environment for college students; an enforceable plan for on-site management and security must be submitted to and approved by the City; and Whereas, City Code requires that projects with two hundred (200) or more bedrooms, professional twenty-four (24) hour on-site management and security must be provided. Additionally, a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk must be provided in the entrance lobby of the buildings; and Whereas, interior and exterior usable shared open space must be provided with amenities that create a high-quality living environment for students. The security plan must include adequate provisions for management, maintenance, and security of such spaces; and Whereas, a secure bicycle parking/storage area shall be provided and maintained within the building or parking garage; and Whereas, the owner shall maintain a valid rental permit and comply with all applicable City codes; and Whereas, the City reserves the right to inspect the property at any time to verify compliance With these requirements; and Whereas, the owner has submitted an on-site management and security plan that includes professional 24-hour on-site management and security, as well as a professionally staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby of one of the buildings; and Whereas, the plans show interior and exterior shared open space, including courtyards and forecourts, recreational spaces, and student amenity spaces; and Whereas, the plans include bicycle parking areas on the exterior of the proposed buildings, as well as on the interior within the underground parking structures; and Whereas, Staff has reviewed the building and site design plans; and Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent street reconstruction projects, as well as to ensure a pedestrian- and bicycle - friendly design with wide sidewalks and parallel parking, the plans for the Capitol Street right-of- way be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure the viewshed corridor of the Old Capitol and to ensure an active streetscape consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, that the skywalk be removed; and Resolution No. Page 3 Whereas, Staff has determined that the proposed screened balconies do not contribute to a high-quality design, but rather would be injurious to the surrounding properties and create a potential safety hazard for residents and the general public, and that the materials proposed for screening the balconies do not adequately mitigate these concerns; and Whereas, Staff recommends that the Owner provide further details at the time they submit a site plan for review and approval, demonstrating that the academic amenity space will be adequately furnished and equipped in a manner that is clearly intended to support the academic endeavors of the residents; and Whereas, Staff recommends that the bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non-opaque fencing; and Whereas, Staff has reviewed the on-site management and security plan, and has determined it meets the intent of the code and finds that it satisfies the approval criteria for student housing height bonus with the following conditions: a. Upon submittal of a site plan review application, Owner shall provide details to confirm compliance with the attached Security Plan, including, but not limited to, information demonstrating: i. that video surveillance covers all ingress and egress points and the publicly - accessible exterior common areas with adequate lighting in those areas to support video capture at night, to the satisfaction of the Police Chief, or designee; ii. adequate protocols for the Police Department (PD) to have full access to the buildings and access to the video and security data; iii. detailed protocols on the repair of the video and security system, should any components fail; iv. A commitment to train security staff so that they are well versed in use of video system and have full access to the system. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall revise the management plan to: i. require a minimum of three (3) uniformed security (non -maintenance) personnel provided on-site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; and ii. provide a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby in both buildings; and Whereas, pursuant to the conditional zoning agreement, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the height bonus and development transfer request on January 16, 2020, and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: a. Re -design of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review and approval by the City Engineer, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street; b. Revisions to the management plan to include details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc.; c. The provision of additional detail on the academic amenity space; d. The bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non- opaque fencing; e. Council approval of substantive deviations from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials; and Resolution No. Page 4 Whereas, this application is subject to review and approval by the Federal Aviation Administration. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that, subject to Federal Aviation Administration approval: 1. The request to transfer 27,400 square feet to the above-described property for the preservation of the Tate Arms building is hereby approved. 2. The request to transfer 304,000 square feet of the Capitol Street right-of-way development potential to the above-described property is hereby approved. No skywalk shall be allowed over Capitol Street. Capitol Street shall be dedicated to the City in fee title without reservation of air rights, particularly for the use of a skywalk or other intrusions into the right-of-way, which dedication shall be made at such time and in accordance with the conditional zoning agreement. The building designs shall be modified accordingly. Capitol Street shall be designed and constructed with wider sidewalks and narrower travel lanes than those shown on the submitted plans, as well as parallel parking, all in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer; 3. The request for the student housing height bonus and the attached Security Plan are hereby approved, subject to the following: a. No balconies shall be allowed; b. The bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non- opaque fencing; c. The academic amenity space shall be adequately furnished and equipped in a manner that is clearly intended to support the academic endeavors of the residents, to be reviewed and approved by the Form -Based Code Committee; d. At the site plan review stage, Owner shall provide Staff with details confirm compliance with the attached Security Plan, including, but not limited to, information demonstrating: I. that video surveillance covers all ingress and egress points and the publicly - accessible exterior common areas with adequate lighting in those areas to support video capture at night, to the satisfaction of the Police Chief, or designee. ii. adequate protocols for the Police Department to have full access to the buildings and access to the video and security data; iii. detailed protocols on the repair of the video and security system, should any components fail; iv. A commitment to train security staff so that they are well versed in use of video system and have full access to the system. d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall revise the Security plan to: I. require a minimum of three (3) uniformed security (non -maintenance) personnel provided on-site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; and ii. provide a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby in both buildings; e. Council approval shall be required if the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials. Resolution No. Page 5 The landscaping and hardscaping on the private property and within the Capitol Street and Court Street rights-of-way shall be maintained by owner in a manner consistent with the submitted landscape plans, or as otherwise allowed and approved by the City Forester. 4. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa are hereby authorized and directed to certify this resolution. 5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Resolution and any and all supporting agreements with the Johnson County Recorder at the Owner's expense. Passed and approved this day of Mayor: Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk 20 Approved by: A -"-IM -6 City Attorneys Office I %d/QC> 12 EAST COURT (FORMER PENTACREST GARDEN APARTMENTS) Enforceable Security Plan Resubmittal September 2019 Form Based Development Worksheet Item G.8.b.(1) - Page 19 AxIOMCONSULTANTS 60 E. COURT ST, IOWA CITY, IOWA 522401319.519.6220 AXIOM PROJECT # 18-0003 AX10MCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. PURPOSE... 1 II. FACILITY PROFILE... 1 FLOORPLANS... T III. SECURITY SYSTEMS... 3 LIGHTING STRATEGY... 3 CCN... 4 ACCESS CONTROLS... 4 ALARMS... 5 ON-SITE MANAGEMENT AND SECURITY... 5-6 IV. INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS... 6 PHYSICAL SECURITY... 6 DATA COMMUNICATIONS... 6 V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES... 6 BUILDING MANAGEMENT... 6-7 TENANT and STAFF... 7 VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES... 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES... R VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES... 9-10 IX. SPECIAL EVENTS... 10 PURPOSE This Enforceable Security Plan establishes a schematic Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for building security controls, implementation of security monitoring, and management of the overall system. In addition to establishing the SOP, this revised plan is provided as part of the overall Design Review Documents requirements for the September 2019 resubmittal. It is the intent of document to detail how our plan meets the requirements as stated in the Form Based Development Worksheet -item G.81.(1) — page 19. Overall, we want to reserve the capability to evolve this system over the life of the project design so that it will better serve the residents who live here by maximiang available technologies and capabilities of available systems as they evolve. Smart phone technology will be key to the overall implementation of this plan and we plan to provide an agile, flexible, and trackable service. This will help eliminate unwanted access to the facility and better control over who has access and when, as well as giving them the ability to quickly report (and respond) to requests. Most importantly— we need the facility to remain functionally relevant for as long as possible and wart to make the entire project as adaptable, safe, and usable for a variety of residents as much as we are able. While the intent of the faciiffy is to be primarily students to start, we don't know that it will stay that way or how the facility will evolve over the life of the building. We intend for this building to have a 100 -year lifespan. II. FACILITY PROFILE The 12 East Court Street (12EC) site, formerly known as Pentacrest Garden Apartments, is composed of a 3A -acre lot with a proposed total building footprint in excess of one -million square feet. The site will have four (4) mixed-use buildings on it, that are connected North -to -South above the fifth floor at the primary step -back. An underground parking facility two levels deep sits underneath both the West and East set of buildings. All of the four buildings are fronted by forecourts that lead to the primary entry point/lobby of each building. All of the buildings except for the Northeast one have rear private courtyards as well. The overall site is split West -to -East by a central pedestrian concourse per the Master Plan. South Capitol street will run North-South through the site on a new 100'-0" city right-of-way that will be re -opened between Burlington and Court streets. All grade -level entry points are indicated in the diagram below. The pedestrian and bicycle corridor between the structures (Capitol Street) — while not part of the building security plan, is also developed to provide maximum benefit and safety to those walking and bicycling the block. The design basis for this block will be similar to that of the new Washington Street streetscape in Page 1 1 12 Iowa City between Clinton and Linn streets. Pedestrian refuges, pinch -downs, visual screening, and lighting improvements provide a corridor which is safely designed for residents both inside and outside. There are twenty-six (26) total at -grade building access points as well as eight (8) entry points below grade from the parking garage - 2 per level, per side. AIV�R Pl/1N ti WEST SIDE AI�o KM 0 EAST SIDE Overview of the ground floor entry -points demarcated. Page AT -GRADE The primary access points to the buildings are located in each of the four (4) forecourts on the Capitol street side. These access points enter into vestibules and subsequently into lobbies for each building (5, 10, 17, 22.) The stairwells located near each lobby area include emergency egress doors which exit into the private courtyards which can then access the alleyways via secured one-way gates (4, 6, 9, 11, 23.) In the case of the NE tower, the egress door simply exits out onto the rear at -grade sidewalk on the East side of the building (19.) Commercial units and amenity areas are accessed at the multiple location points - some of these will be exit -only configurations (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26.) UNDERGROUND There are two garage access points located in public alleyways that lead to the underground parking structures. The West garage is accessed at the SW corner of the SW building (12) and the East garage is accessed near the East mid -point in the East alley (20.) The garage accesses will be double 10'-0" vehicle doors with an adjacent person -door. Within the garages there are secured access points into the North -most and South -most stairwells where building entrants can enter the building via the elevators or stairways. The NE stairwell and elevator will also access the proposed rooftop restaurant. 111. SECURITY SYSTEMS 12EC will provide a robust security system to help establish safer and more secure living quarters and commercial spaces for all tenants. Our design team will accomplish this with a proactive rather than a reactive approach. Our design approach has been to create an environment that is tailored towards safety and an incredible living and learning environment. To accomplish this we have provided: • High quality lighting plans • Closed-circuit television systems Intuitive, adaptable, and modern access controls • Adaptive alarm systems 24-7 on site security and maintenance Collaboration with University of Iowa and City personnel Lighting Strategy (DR300) Exterior lighting has been strategically placed to highlight the perimeter of the towers including building access points, private courtyards, forecourts, the primary pedestrian concourse, and even the rear public alleyways. The lighting plan will provide sufficient foot candles (FC) as required by the IECC and local codes - allowing for clear visibility throughout the site - without spilling beyond the perimeter into neighboring lots and streets. The exterior lights will be white -hue LEDs with an appropriate temperature Page 1 3 selection, that will operate via photocell activation (dawn -to -dusk.) These will act as a deterrent/security feature while providing adequate lighting for excellent video capture. Interior lighting will be arranged and designed with the same scrutiny as exterior lighting to create a well - lit, safe environment indoors. This will include common areas, shared hallways, lobbies, utility areas, amenity spaces, and underground parking facilities. These areas will provide 24/7 lighting to ensure proper monitoring via closed circuit television systems and keep areas of public traffic visible. Closed Circuit Television (CCN) 12EC will be monitored 24/7 by CCN cameras throughout the facility. This will include entry doors, vestibules, lobbies, amenity spaces, parking garages (360 -degree 2MP), common hallways (180 -degree 2MP)), forecourts, courtyards and controlled gate access points. Every ingress and egress point to the building will be covered by video exacq\Aston (single -point 3MP cameras.) Public areas will also be monitored along the building frontage with 1800 cameras that are able to view the central concourse, forecourts, courtyards, and commercial frontages. At this time we intent to use the ExacgVision system, Z -series Hybrid & IP Network Video Recorders or something equivalent. Exacq provides a large -capacity storage recorder which works in tandem with cloud -based uploading to allow for users to view footage anywhere using proprietary viewing software. It also includes a mobile app to allow for easy monitoring and data retrieval. The feed will be a continuous loop which will be viewable at the main security office as well as at each security kiosk. Security staff on site will have full time access to the live -feed video and will be able to monitor the video feeds 24/7. The combination of our conscientiously designed floor plans and strategical placement of cameras will create a complete coverage of the site and building. Electronic Access Control Electronic access controls will be provided via proximity pads throughout the site. All exterior access points for residential areas will be provided with this entry system. Residential occupants throughout the facility will be able to access the building through the four primary vestibule locations in the forecourts. These locations will be locked and security 183$/90 SERIES controlled .9hR-6.� -, ._ E+p Fe& 24-7 with only authorized residents having access privileges. The NE entry point i' will be a public entry point during normal operating hours as well as determined I restaurant operating hours in the early evening. Outside of operating hours this t g n location will be locked and secured in the same fashion as the other three BLt forecourt locations. go Paye The courtyard access points will be egress only and may not re-entered upon exit. Garage access points will be controlled via garage -door -openers, mobile apps, or access codes given only to residents and interior garage doors will be accessible via access panel the same as the forecourt entry points. Access points will be accessible via electronic security panels controlled by key -fobs, reader cards, smart phones or both. Door King high-rise systems are a similar system that has been used in the past and could be utilized on this project although priority may be given to something that is more smart -phone integrated and discourages the possibility of memorizing codes, or giving access out to non-residents. Door King's (DK) 1835/90 Series High Rise Building Telephone Entry/Access Control System (shown in Figure 2) provides digital access control devices such as keycard and fob readers to provide muni -user access into common spaces. There will be door -prop alarms at all building locations outside of the NE primary location and commercial unit entries. This fob and mobile app access system will be implemented on all Parking Garage and Level 1 entry points as detailed above. Residents' guests wishing to enter the facility shall only be able to enter by receiving access from a resident who is in proximity of the building either from a local access point (paneVpad) or via a smartphone app. Individual residential units will also be access controlled with only that units residents being able to access it. Adjustments to units based on move-in/move-out, expired leases, etc.., will be able to be quickly and efficiently controlled by the building management of 12EC. Tight controls will be maintained for accessory areas such as the wellness facility, pool, study areas, and skywalk. Access to these areas will be restricted. Alarms Commercial tenants shall be responsible for providing and maintaining their own alarm systems. Primary and secondary entry doors to all residential areas at and below grade shall have alarm systems on them in case of forced entry. This alarm system shall ring to the 24-7 primary office/desk location as well as security kiosks in each building. These systems will ring to security who will then make a final determination whether to escalate the call to the authorities. These entry points will also include an extended -open alarm to prevent stuck doors or instances where tenants prop open doors and inadvertently leave them unattended. These systems will be triggered to alarm Internally to the help desks after an extended period so that building security can respond. Individual residential units shall not have alarms but may install them upon management approval. On -Site 2417 Management and Security Personnel The primary security, management, and maintenance office will be located on Level 1 In the Northeast building. This location will be professionally managed and staffed 24-7. This location shall have primarily Page 1 5 surveillance, entry, and alarm access to all areas of the entire facility with remote access to all of the security/management kiosks inside of the other three buildings. All locations shall be able to communicate with one another via an intercom system. IV. INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS Numerous security safeguards protecting information and technology systems will be present at 12 EC. Based on the type of occupancy, quantity of units, and scale of the building, the follow features are to be provided: Physical Security • All network server and IT equipment shall be in a locked and secured room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have fire extinguishers located within the room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have smoke detectors installed in room. • The network server and IT rooms shall operate on an uninterruptible power supply (ups). • No food or beverages are to be allowed inside or around network server & IT rooms or enclosures. • When leaving and closing out secured areas, ensure all sensitive and confidential information is properly stored and not left In the open. Data Communications security A firewall and security services shall be implemented for the communication between the 12EC public intemet access and the general public and business patrons. Future innovations may allow for offsite integration of a number of these features. V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Building Management Responsibilities The main responsibility of the Building Management is to implement the provided security systems, Properly utilize and monitor CCN cameras, provide maintenance and upkeep of security systems, maintain a safer space for occupants, report incidents to local authorities where applicable, and record Video for all monitored locations. To exercise the full capabilities of the surveillance and security systems implemented, a central on-site management/security desk will be staffed 24/7 and equipped with monitors tied into the CCTV cameras, providing continuous loop for surveillance of the site as well as the previously described building areas. Fob and mobile access will be periodically checked and managed. Necessary firmware and software updates will be provided to ensure the system is fully functionable and reliable. To help create a safe environment for building occupants, the management and security desk will be available to tenants 24/7. Page 1 6 Appropriate personnel will be sufficiently trained to use the video system per the final plan and design once the building is completed. Security personnel on site will be trained to manage the building but staff will only be as good as a call to ICPD. On site security will not be armed or trained to respond to active threats but will respond as quickly as possible to those events with calls to ICPD and direction to personnel who arrive as well as assistance with access to the areas in question. Tenant and Staff Responsibilities All leased tenants shall be required by their lease -contract to act in a responsible fashion with regard to their fellow building residents. Tenants, both residential and commercial, are expected to not prop doors open to prevent unauthorized personnel form entering the building. Residents are also expected to not allow anyone into the building that is not a guest and does not have individual access. Building occupants will be expected to report any incidents involving criminal activity to the building security and management desk. Emergency situations that involve a potential threat to human safety should be reported immediately by residents to the ICPD prior to notifying building management and security. VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES The main goal of 12 EC's security plan is to provide a proactive approach to public safety to prevent criminal activity from occurring instead of simply reacting to incidents that may transpire. This is accomplished not only by trying to identify smart integration of modern security systems but also by way of smart design and integration. Our project includes a number of well designed and integrated features to achieve these goals: • Smart layouts of floorplans with good sight lines and lighting levels • A well -constituted exterior lighting plan providing high quality LED lighting to vital exterior areas as well as lesser considered areas like the heavily -trafficked public alleyways behind the buildings. • Residential unit access controls tailored to individual residents and easily altered/adjusted by management. • Residential unit door design with solid -core frames in a swing -out configuration so that doors to residential units would be very difficult to break into compared to more typical apartment design. • Integration with City and University personnel to allow for review of final design and security considerations in order to provide good dissemination of information and a provision of lessons learned. Page 1 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES As part of this security plan, local emergency response personnel were contacted to determine expected emergency response times. While not every entity was able to provide such times due to too many unknown variables, a number of information pieces were provided. With 12EC's central downtown location, the site is located within minutes of nearly every available emergency service. Iowa City's Fire Department (ICFD) is within an estimated four -minute response area. Once on-site, the ICFD has access to all sides of the site via primary streets and alleyways. The closest fire station to 12EC is ICFD First Station 1 Headquarters which is located at 20 South Gilbert Street. ICPD is located at the same location as ICFD and can generally respond quickly to this location. While specific response times can not be given due to a variety of factors, expectations are for generally quick and responsive requests for assistance. In addition, this security plan will be reviewed and coordinated with ICPD prior to full acceptance and implementation. University of Iowa Campus Security services are also located close to site — only 1 block away — directly adjacent to the North. ICPD will be given access to video and security data for issues of safety directly related to the building that would cause direct harm to the occupants or the building. The Owner intends to work with the ICPD as necessary to maintain a safe and secure environment and allow ICPD access to reasonable amounts of information per their ongoing requests. In much the same way that the dormitories work with calls from RA staff (or general residents) to public safety to events/active threats —the intent at our building will be for security staff (or residents) to call ICPD to respond to these events quickly and effectively. Emergency medical services (EMS) have reported to have a response time of under five -minutes in urban areas which Include downtown Iowa City. To aid in the response procedure of EMS responses, personnel will have access to all sides of the site as well. The closet EMS service station is Johnson County Ambulance Services which is located on 808 South Dubuque Street. A University of Iowa Quick Care clinic is located only 2 blocks from the site on Clinton Street. Page 1 8 `. IOWA IAVF IJ f c C A VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES To ensure security systems are working as intended, periodic testing of systems and equipment will be performed. Staff or security will perform periodic walk-throughs of the site to ensure proper function of access points, gate latching systems, and camera mounts. When staff confirms doors are able to latch properly, they will then assess the electronic access control at each building entry to check that doors are locked when closed, that they respond to the access fob, and that the door unlocks appropriately. While checking entry points, 12EC's surveillance systems will be analyzed to verity no objects are obstructing the view of the cameras. Staff or security will also verify the cameras are capable of overseeing the entire area intended to be monitored by said device and adjust accordingly. If an item is rendered inoperable, it Page 1 9 Jo v WASII•NGTON S1 Z lU <0 0 COLL E STI N B RLINGiON ST i m _ I 1 WC RTS U) Ln 7 HARRI ON SI w Ln / r _ Z l� N 7 IR) t : in % a � PRENT S ST WR10,I a `, '' > - SIE .0 -- vi IPENT04 ST i ,�v f c C A VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES To ensure security systems are working as intended, periodic testing of systems and equipment will be performed. Staff or security will perform periodic walk-throughs of the site to ensure proper function of access points, gate latching systems, and camera mounts. When staff confirms doors are able to latch properly, they will then assess the electronic access control at each building entry to check that doors are locked when closed, that they respond to the access fob, and that the door unlocks appropriately. While checking entry points, 12EC's surveillance systems will be analyzed to verity no objects are obstructing the view of the cameras. Staff or security will also verify the cameras are capable of overseeing the entire area intended to be monitored by said device and adjust accordingly. If an item is rendered inoperable, it Page 1 9 shall be addressed in a reasonable amount of time. Broken equipment shall be noted and repaired as necessary. The type of system 12EC will implement will provide complete and ongoing feedback loops as to the functioning of the system. All camera function will be available in real time and malfunctioning or broken cameras will be able to be identified immediately. Owner intends to keep the system operational and functional with ongoing minute by minute capability to verify alarm operation, video operation, and failsafes to ensure systemwide functionality. This system is designed to maximize capability without draining WiFl. Ongoing maintenance logs are not as necessary with a live -response system like this but annual inspections and maintenance run-throughs will be performed on the system per the requirements and recommendations of the manufacturer. Freeman Lock and Alarm/ATEC, who will install and maintain this system for the Owner has confirmed this is the typical protocol for these newer systems and they will be in charge of maintaining them at all times. Tenants shall also be responsible for reporting any observed defects in security access systems that affect building access points and tenant dwelling spaces. In the event a tenant requires maintenance involving their unit's access control, the tenant shall submit an emergency maintenance request to building management to resolve the issue. The Owner would like to be adaptable to issues and would like to work with the City and ICPD to change building protocols as time goes on and processes and amended towards Iowa City's larger buildings. "How does this building compare to other buildings?" will be critical and the Owner would like to keep security protocols at similar levels. Annual checks of systems should be a part of the annual check of ALL systems (e.g. fire alarms) and part of the overall annual building permit process. IX. SPECIAL EVENTS The primary special event expected at the 12EC facility will be move-in/move-out events. These events will primarily take place in the late May/early June and early August timeframes and, to a lesser degree, in mid December. Because of the large amount of residential units, all move-in/move-out events will be coordinated with the City to facilitate any allowed street closures and to apply for the required permits. In addition, emergency personnel will be notified that such events will be taking place in order to coordinate as necessary. It may be necessary during these times to temporarily adjust the security systems described herein for short periods of time. An additional security person patrolling at periodic high volume times such as these would be a possibility if requested by ICPD. The Owner would like to work with ICPD to determine what these times will be and will address and reformulate these processes based on the future and final design of the building. Page 1 10 Kellie Fruehling From: James Throgmorton <jthrogmo@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, February 2, 2020 5:34 PM To: Council Cc: Susan Mims; John Thomas; Pauline Taylor; Bruce Teague; Mazahir Salih; Janice Weiner, Laura Bergus Subject: Height bonus Attachments: Feb 2020 letter to Council re 12 Court St.docx I RISK Dear Mayor and Council members, Please see the attached letter Jim Throgmorton Late Handouts Distributed (Date) 814 Ronalds St. Iowa City, IA 52245 February 2, 2020 Mayor and City Council, I understand that on February 4 you will be considering the developer's request to provide the proposed Pentacrest Garden Apartments an additional 5 -story height bonus. This would enable construction of four combined 15 -story structures at 12 Court Street. I suspect all of you know I think approving such a massive project would be a serious mistake that would haunt Iowa City for decades to come. It is excessive in scale, is unnecessarily risky for both the developer and the city, would radically and irreversibly alter the character and identity of the city, and would last for decades to come whether it succeeds or fails. The project should be scaled down and built incrementally over time. Given the uncertainties, risks, and changes in context that have occurred over the past year, I recommend that you not provide any bonus beyond the two stories already approved by the staff. Such a scaled-down project (10 -story structures) would be more consistent with the Riverfront Crossings District's Master Plan, would provide high quality off -campus student housing close to the University, would yield very large increases in net property tax revenue to the city, would generate roughly $6 million for the City's Affordable Housing Fund, and would achieve higher quality urban design and be more compatible with quality and character of the surrounding neighborhood. But you are the ones making the decision, not me. As you make your decision, please take the following recommendations into account. First, don't feel pressured to act on the formal request just a few days after you received it. Give yourselves and the public sufficient time to consider the merits of the proposed project. Second, don't feel compelled to approve the developer's request simply because the developer has born the cost of developing the formal application. The developer decided one year ago to take the risk of developing a detailed application even though the Council's November 2018 4-3 support for his proposal was tentative and tenuous. The developer knew the Council's support might vanish if (1) only one of the Council members changed her or his mind, or (2) if new Council members elected in November 2019 had views that differed from those of the Council members they replaced. Third, as you consider the application, I encourage you to require persuasive answers to the following questions: 1. Does the developer have a legal "right" to be granted the requested bonus? In the past, the Council has been told the developer clearly has a right to apply for the bonus, but whether or not to grant the requested 5 -story bonus is a matter of Council judgment. In other words, the developer has no legal "right" to receive the bonuses just because he has requested them. And yet, during the Council's November 6 work session last year, Susan Mims stated and Geoff Fruin affirmed, that the Code specifies that the developer has a right to a specific square footage in return for the rededication of the Capitol Street ROW. Please ask Eleanor Dilkes to clarify whether the Council has the legal authority to deny any or all of the requested 5 -story bonus. 2. How, specifically, will approval of the proposed project help Iowa City achieve its recently adopted climate action goals of reducing the city's carbon emissions 45% by 2030 and achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050? I doubt you would want to approve the largest residential project in Iowa City's history unless it does. 3. How will the additional 1800 beds of luxury student housing help increase the supply of rental housing students and other Iowa City residents can afford? 4. What effect would the additional 1800 beds have on vacancy rates in existing apartment complexes? Ask owners of those complexes what they anticipate. 5. What effect would the possible decline in U of Iowa undergrad enrollment as a result of the projected "enrollment cliff' have on vacancy rates in the 12 Court St project? Think carefully about what the keynote speaker said at the CVB's annual meeting in December. 6. What effect would the U of Iowa's possible policy decision to require 2nd year students to live on campus have on occupancy rates in the proposed project? 7. What effect will the 1,800 additional beds at anticipated rental rates have on rental duplexes and single-family structures in the city's older neighborhoods? Ask rental apartment managers, the Association of Realtors, and the Landlords Association what they think. Thank you for your service to the city and for taking these concerns into account as you make your decision. Best regards, Jim Throgmorton STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: 1 r I C04;qui h CITY OF lOVVA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (3I9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Item 11.c.: 12 E. Court Street— Level II Design Review Bonus Height Request DRC19-04 A resolution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street in the Riverfront Crossing — South Downtown Zone. Overview BACKGROUND & BONUS REQUEST PROCESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION REVIEW CRITERIA NEXT STEPS RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF & PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Downtown & Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (January 2013) Adoption of Form Based Code (June 2014) Conditionally Rezoned from RM -44 to RFC -SD (September 2018) Level I Design Review -Staff (January 2020) Level II Design Review -Staff recommendation to P&Z and City Council for Bonus Height request and to fulfill CZA Conditions Final Plat -Dedication of Right -of -Way and Construction Drawings for public infrastructure Building Permit -Staff Bonus Height Request Applicant has requested 7 stories of bonus height for 2, 15 -story, mixed use buildings Total max bonus height in the zone is 15 stories, subject to discretionary review Zoning District Base Max Height 8 stories Total Max Bonus Height 15 stories Bonus Height Request Bonus Height Floors 9-13 & Floor 14 & part Floors 9-14 Floor 15 *Requires City Council Level 11 Design Review regardless of number of stories Overview Level II height bonus request Per CZA, requires review by the staff Form -Based Code Committee; Planning and Zoning Commission to make recommendation to City Council Form -Based Code Committee determined that the project meets the standards of the zoning code Height bonus request is a discretionary process; specific criteria to help guide decision making Staff concerns: S kywa l k Fully -screened balconies Design of Capital Street ROW Development Process GENERAL • Annexation • Rezoning of Land Plat(s) Height Bonus Request Design Review Site Plan Building Permit Construction LEVEL I DESIGN REVIEW -STAFF Staff FBC Committee review of application Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and FBC Standards May grant up to +2 stories in height above base maximum height LEVEL II DESIGN REVIEW -CITY COUNCIL Requests for 3 or more stories of bonus height, or any open space transfers, historic preservation height transfers, or pubic right-of-way height transfers must be reviewed by City Council 12 E. Court Development Process LEVEL II DESIGN GENERAL • Annexation • Rezoning of Land • Plat(s) • Height Bonus) Request • Design Review • Site Plan • Building Permit • Construction LEVEL I DESIGN REVIEW -STAFF & PZ Staff FBC Committee review of application Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and FBC Standards May grant up to +2 stories in height above base maximum height & PZ will review/recommend if L_II REVIEW- PZ & CITY COUNCIL Requests for 3 or more stories of bonus height, or any open space transfers, historic preservation height transfers, or pubic right-of-way height transfers must be reviewed by City Council Conditional Zoning Agreement • Dedicate the Capital Street right-of-way and build public street improvements according to the deadlines of an approved phasing plan; • Obtain approval of the exterior design elevations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. If Level II design review is required for bonus height, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council; • Install streetscape improvements to enhance the pedestrian environment; • Satisfy the affordable housing requirements; • Substantially conform with the building footprints shown for this area in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan; • Provide a landscaped interior courtyard on the eastside of the project site; • Use a qualified architect with experience in both high-quality urban design and large-scale student housing; and If requesting bonus height, that the project "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". Project Description SITE & OPEN SPACE FLOORPLANS f'ktLu�Ir�kY C001 Project Desc West Building 492 dwelling units 3 levels of underground parking Non-residential uses along Capital Street, Court Street, and Burlington Street ription y C1 EAST ELEVATION OE WEST BGILOING OS TYVIM R Project Descri West Building 7 ption Academic spaces to include study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi Recreational amenities include a half basketball court, track, jacuzzi area, and outdoor pool deck HiELMiiNnRY cool -- r. 77 rMilt : 1 1,lid -- 9 +' r q — w Project uescrintic -, rnwwww Project Description East Building Academic spaces to include study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi No recreational uses in east building Restaurant on 15th Floor rma cool Project Description Proposed Materials Applicant has proposed to used metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete Proposed Skywalk o Connects the east and west building at the fourth floor Proposed Capital Street Right -of -Way 12.5' walkways 12.5' travel lanes Angled parking PERSPECTIVE TF PICAL FRONTAGE FACADE Review Criteria GENERAL DESIGN REVIEW PRE -REQUISITE SPECIFIC BONUS HEIGHT CRITERIA CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT Building Height Bonus Provisions ➢AII requests must meet the approval criteria in the FBC ➢Demonstrate excellence in building and site design ➢Use high quality building materials, Designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. Specific Approval Criteria Public Right -of -Way Transfer Criterion The land proposed for dedication (sending site) is needed in order to construct or improve rights-of-way necessary to realize the vision of the Riverfront Crossings master plan Findings • Applicant has agreed to dedicate public ROW to extend Capital Street • Extension of Capital Street ROW is envisioned in the RFC Master Plan • Applicant has requested to transfer 304,000 sq. ft. of ROW development potential Specific Approval Criteria Public Right -of -Way Transfer STAFF CONCERNS Capital Street ROW design does not align with City expectations Angled parking Width of travel lanes too large Proposed Skywalk Could block the views of the Old Capital to the south Could potentially divert street -level pedestrian activity Specific Approval Criteria Historic Preservation Transfer Criterion The site from which the height transfer is requested (sending site) is designated as an Iowa City landmark Findings • Tate Arms is designated as an Iowa City Historic Landmark • Applicant previously transferred a portion of the development potential of the Tate Arms to an adjacent property and agreed to a rehabilitation plan • Current request is to transfer the remaining potential, 27,400 sq ft, to 12 E. Court Street Specific Approval Criteria Student Housing Criteria Location: Is within the University, South Downtown, or West Riverfront subdistrict Is within 1,000' walking distance from the University of Iowa campus Findings • Located within the South Downtown Subdistrict • Is located across the street from the University of Iowa campus Specific Approval Criteria Student Housing Management, Design & Amenities: An enforcement plan for on-site management and security. For project with 200 or more bedroomsprofessional 24 hour on site management and se51 t . A professionally staffed management o ice reception desk must be provided in the entrance lobby. Interior and exterior usable shared open sace must be provided with amenities that create a high qualityFiN in environment f6r students. The management p an must include a equate provisions for management, maintenance, and security. A secure bicycle parking area shall be provided and maintained within the building or paring garage. The owner shall maintain a valid rental permit and comply with all applicable City Codes. The City reserves the right to inspect the property to verify compliance with these provisions. Specific Approval Criteria Student Housing Findings Meets location criteria Demonstrates compliance with number of on-site bicycle parking Staff recommends transparent fencing around bike parking within parking garages for safety reasons Specific Approval Criteria Student Housing Findings More detail is needed in regards to the security plan. Staff recommends final administrative review and approval of management plan Confirmation of camera coverage • Protocols for Police Department accessing videos • Protocols for timely repairs • Staffing requirements Plan lacks detail on how the student amenity spaces creates a high-quality living environment, staff recommends more justification Applicant has proposed fully screened balconies, which staff does not support Rezoning Conditions Development of the subject property must substantially conform to the building footprints shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (page 61). Any significant deviation in the building footprint, as reasonably determined by the City, must be approved by the City Council in a Level ll design review process. rwew.u+. .wc�c� W01NiV�v .OD4gYl The plans show 5% more linear feet along exterior walls and 4.8% more square feet than the Master Plan L� i■ •tea •9►' HARRISON ST_ i F r • f � • # • ; SD - 4. Capitol Street Student Housing - As the superblock ' o bounded by Burlington Street, Court Street, Clinton Street, and v E PMadison Street redevelops, Capital Street should be extended to tr c • connect Burlington Street and Court Street. This would reconnect 4 % ► the original street grid in this location, and make two development 4. * ••ALMblocks with prime street frontage. Due to its close proximityto �• • • • • campus and the student recreation center, this site would he ideal r for student housing. In particular, university -sponsored, off- - campus, privately developed (owned and operated) efficiency or suite style apartments would be appropriate on this site. Situated internally, this site could accommodate up to S buildings (urban * Frontage surrounding internal courtyards), and yield well over 700 a ° rooms. Additional building height and density may be possible if parking demand is accommodated underground or offsite. 1 ._ �+ % 2 Dole to o a• U T S • ■��r .'� -- 4' Capi tof Stree[ Student Nausing SD F . � U • PRE'4TiSS ST. Rezoning Conditions Development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Access to the University of Iowa's Voxman Music Building from the interior courtyard may be restricted or limited for safety reasons if deemed appropriate by the City Council in a Level II design review process. Plans show an interior courtyard extending from Capital Street to the alley between the east building and the Voxman Music Building Rezoning Conditions In accordance with the Riverfront Crossing Form -Based Code, any request for bonus height shall "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood" Materials include metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete Extensive window and door openings All entrances to non-residential uses along Burlington, Court, and Capital Streets are at - grade; helping to create a more walkable environment Stepbacks meet the 10' at the 51h story; deeper stepbacks toward Court Street Located between the Voxman Music Building and an 8 -story residential project; Johnson County Courthouse to the south Conditionally Rezoned from RM -44 to RFC -SD (September 2018) Level I Design Review -Staff (January 2020) Level II Design Review -Staff recommendation to P&Z and City Council for Bonus Height request and to fulfill CZA Conditions Final Plat -Dedication of Right -of -Way and Construction Drawings for public infrastructure Building Permit -Staff Staff Recommendation 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re -design of the Capital Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. An additional administrative review of the management plan that includes details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc. prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional detail and justification on the academic amenity space. 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. If the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, these changes must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. An example of a substantive change is a change to exterior building materials. 8. Landscape and hardscape within the Capitol and Court Street rights-of-way must be maintained by the owner in a manner consistent with approved landscape plans. Planning &Zoning Commission Recommendation 2. Re -design of the Capital Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 4. An additional administrative review of the management plan that includes details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc. prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional detail and justification on the academic amenity space. 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. If the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, these changes must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. An example of a substantive change is a change to exterior building materials. 8. Landscape and hardscape within the Capitol and Court Street rights-of-way must be maintained by the owner in a manner consistent with approved landscape plans. STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r rrM as � h CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: Rob Decker, AXIOM Consultants & Nathan Griffith, Neumann Monson Architects in 11.c � r CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg 0 0 MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS 12EC 18.094 01/09/2020 H OPEN -SPACE RENDERINGS PROPOSED FOOTPRINT AXIOMCONSULTANTS j BURLINGTON_.CLINTON INTERSECTION ., r ■ I I. Ata. BURLINGTON S TAND UI RECREATIONWLDINS ` • , ' r � II II 1 4s fly li k. COURT&CAPITOLINTER CLION— NEUMANN MONSON d OPEN -SPACE RENDERINGS AXIOMCONSULTANTS BURLI SITE PLAN EXAMPLE: CLOVERDALE 749APARTMENTS, LOSANGELES NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS SKYWALK AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 ENLARGED ILLUSTRATION OF BALCONIES EXAMPLE: CLOVERDALE 749APARTMENTS, LOSANGELES NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS FULLY SCREENED BALCONIES AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 ENLARGED ILLUSTRATION OF BALCONIES EXAMPLE: FAIRMOUNT HOTEL SKYBRIDGE, AUSTIN NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS FULLY SCREENED BALCONIES AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 �eaexo�V•N�••••u xorts NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS SITE AXIOMCONSULTANTS c ics: a_a_ PRESENTATION CONCLUDED ar % 04 CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-[826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org COUNCIL PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: John Thomas M � r CITY ❑F IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 3 9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org N% 1: ill - Y: •i Itt .:.. fir, r ` moi... •y, - s '. �. � :: _ ��R � 20I�Gnogle� �N � • R 1 E Goo I� ea rt h r,�� Y _44 W1.74" N 122.18-55.32" W elegy 209 -ft eye alt 92 -Ft #2 .6 USC Street � TQ56:0 Exit Street VieView 1 .1 1 1 Ilk 14 ell lag 7 .jw le 'o le -Fll — I . A . 0 14 OV 00ir 00 it wwllr I TrMff r Fes; s c f#i� � t• - ,..-: t_ AL ,.,, o . o W. is-- lit= .— I A. + _Iii:.: V Li y' + a - - - 248 f[ S:.00Sle ear �; 199 41°39'48.2'. N 91°32'09.10" W elegy 744 ft eye alt 1800 f[ m : -ow ["ll Exit Street View x 71 go st Flif 4b mn P G v goo ear ELI 4V39'4&3s,Nw'jr—§T,'�Ji- MF%,U797 ft T eye alt 73L$ ft . 4b - ad' WPM / j I -earth IrL 41°39'44.29" N 91'32'09.57" W elev 787 ft eye alt 711 fl, Alm 46 12 Old Capitol at Jefferson Street ® iiI Exit Street View PRESENTATION CONCLUDED ar % 04 CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-[826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Item Number: 12. CITY OF IOWA CITY `�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Mercer Aquatic Center Pool LED Lighting Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Prepared By: Ben Clark, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Juli Seydell Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost of construction is $155,000 and will be funded through the Carbon Emissions Reduction Project account # E4520 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: The project includes improving energy efficiency and reduces carbon emissions by replacing existing metal halide lighting fixtures with LED lighting fixtures. Lighting improvements are needed for full visibility of swimmers in the pool. Background /Analysis: The project involves replacing the original 1986 metal halide pool ceiling light fixtures with high - efficiency LED light fixtures. The intent of the project is to improve energy efficiency and also to meet the current Iowa Department of Public Health pool code for lighting requirements. The new light fixtures will be indirect lighting in an aluminum housing and are suitable for natatoriums, corrosive and wet environments. The most significant benefits are: increased brightness extremely long lifespans (50,000 to 100,000 hours or extremely high light quality and little to no maintenance costs. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution for safe monitoring of pool users, more), very high energy efficiency, Prepared by: Ben Clark, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5436 Resolution No. 20-28 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Mercer Aquatic Center Pool LED Lighting Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Whereas, notice of public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the above- named project was published as required by law, and the hearing thereon held; and Whereas, the City Engineer or designee intends to post notice of the project on the website owned and maintained by the City of Iowa City; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Carbon Emissions Reduction Project account # E4520. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: The project manual and estimate of cost for the above-named project are hereby approved. 2. The amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construction of the above- named project shall be in the amount of 10% (ten percent) of bid payable to Treasurer, City of Iowa City, Iowa. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post notice as required in Section 26.3, not less than 13 days and not more than 45 days before the date of the bid letting, which may be satisfied by timely posting notice on the Construction Update Network, operated by the Master Builder of Iowa, and the Iowa League of Cities website. 4. Sealed bids for the above-named project are to be received by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, at the Office of the City Clerk, at the City Hall, before 3:00 p.m, on the 251h day of February, 2020. At that time, the bids will be opened by the City Engineer or his designee, and thereupon referred to the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for action upon said bids at its next regular meeting, to be held at the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m. on the 3rd day of March, 2020, or at a special meeting called for that purpose. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020. LAA� Ma roved by Attest: City Clerk City Attorney's Office Resolution No. 20-28 Page 2 It was moved by trims adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: and seconded by 'Taylor the Resolution be Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 13. CITY OF IOWA CITY `�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the FY20 Wastewater Clarifier Repairs Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Prepared By: Ben Clark, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost of construction is $375,000 and will be funded through the Wastewater Clarifier Repairs account # V3144 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This project involves the removal, repair and/or replacement of existing secondary clarifier equipment at the Wastewater Treatment Facility. Background /Analysis: The four original clarifiers that were constructed circa 1989 were drained and inspected in calendar year 2012 during the design phase of the Wastewater Treatment Facilities Consolidation Project. The inspection revealed substantial corrosion on significant portions of the mechanisms. Two of these clarifiers were repaired in fiscal year 2017. This project will repair the remaining two that still have their original carbon steel mechanisms and which are nearing the end of their useful life. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Ben Clark, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5436 Resolution No. 20-29 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the FY20 Wastewater Clarifier Repairs Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Whereas, notice of public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the above- named project was published as required by law, and the hearing thereon held; and Whereas, the City Engineer or designee intends to post notice of the project on the website owned and maintained by the City of Iowa City; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Wastewater Clarifier Repairs account At V3144. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The project manual and estimate of cost for the above-named project are hereby approved. 2. The amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construction of the above- named project shall be in the amount of 10% (ten percent) of bid payable to Treasurer, City of Iowa City, Iowa. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post notice as required in Section 26.3, not less than 13 days and not more than 45 days before the date of the bid letting, which may be satisfied by timely posting notice on the Construction Update Network, operated by the Master Builder of Iowa, and the Iowa League of Cities website. 4. Sealed bids for the above-named project are to be received by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, at the Office of the City Clerk, at the City Hall, before 3:00 p.m. on the 251 day of February, 2020. At that time, the bids will be opened by the City Engineer or his designee, and thereupon referred to the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for action upon said bids at its next regular meeting, to be held at the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m. on the 3'd day of March, 2020 or at a special meeting called for that purpose. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020. City Clerk City Attorney's Office Resolution No. 20-29 Page 2 It was moved by Aims adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: and seconded by 'Thomas the Resolution be Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 14. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution adopting a policy for use of public right-of-way and City Plaza for sidewalk cafes and rescinding Resolution No. 16-328. Prepared By: Susan Dulek, Ass't. City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Policy Executive Summary: The sidewalk cafe policy was last updated in 2016, and staff is recommending a few changes in part to reflect the improvements to City Plaza (aka, the ped mall) and Washington St. Background /Analysis: The sidewalk cafe policy was last revised in 2016, and staff is recommending the following changes: 1. Fencing is no longer required to be anchored to the new surface of City Plaza and on the new cement on Washington St. 2. Cafes on City Plaza may abut a planter as long as there is 6 feet of walkway on the side of the cafe opposite of the planter. 3. Cafes located on Washington St. between Clinton St. and Linn St. must be detached from the building face at least 8 feet. 4. The Alcohol and Beverage Division has provided more clarity on what makes a sidewalk cafe contiguous to the licensed establishment and therefore an overhead canopy is no longer required. 5. More cafes are wanting to have outdoor heating units, and the policy requires that they be approved by the Fire Dept. 6. Cafe owners have not requested using planters in lieu of fencing and staff believes that this should no longer be an option. 7. City Council has increased the daily fee for a parking space to $20. 8. Some provisions within the policy have been rearranged to make it more user friendly. Staff is not recommending an increase in fees but likely will make such a recommendation for the 2021 cafe season. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Policy Prepared by Susan Dulek, Asst. City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA (319)356-5030 RESOLUTION NO. 20-30 Resolution adopting a policy for use of public right- of-way and City Plaza for sidewalk cafes and rescinding Resolution No. 16-328. Whereas, sidewalk cafes are a use of the public right of way and City Plaza, a/k/a the ped mall, in the CB2, CBS, and CB10 zones; Whereas, in Resolution No. 16-328, City Council adopted a policy for sidewalk cafes; Whereas, the improvements to City Plaza have nearly been completed; Whereas, all cafes in City Plaza except those between Linn Street and Dubuque Street should be detached from the building face; Whereas, to avoid drilling holes into the new surface of City Plaza, cafes located on City Plaza should not be allowed to anchor their fencing; and Whereas, the City should adopt the attached policy. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The attached "Sidewalk Cafe Policy" is adopted. 2. Resolution No. 16-328 is rescinded in its entirety. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020. I / Mayor Approved by: ' Attest4ty Clerk City Attorney's Office Resolution No. 20-30 Page 2 It was moved by Mims and seconded by salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Bergus % Mims x Salih x Taylor % Teague x Thomas x Weiner SIDEWALK CAFE POLICY (adopted Res. No. 20- 30 ) In addition to the policy set forth below, sidewalk cafes are governed by Section 10-3-3 of the City Code, which is set forth below at the end of the policy. Location 1. Sidewalk cafes may be located in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). 2. In City Plaza (a/k/a, the ped mall), cafes may be located in either zone 1 or zone 2 if in conjunction with zone 1. Zone 1 is the area within ten feet (10') of the buildings. Zone 3 is the emergency/service lane through the middle of City Plaza. Zone 2 is the remaining area. For the specific definitions of the zones in City Plaza, see Section 10-5-1 of the City Code. Easement Agreement 1. The agreement shall be between the City and the cafe owner with the approval of the building owner, if different than the cafe owner. 2. The agreement shall provide that no property right is conferred and that it may be terminated if the City determines that the right of way is needed. 3. The agreement shall include provisions for insurance, indemnification, fencing, maintenance, including vegetation and the subsurface if applicable, and any other reasonable provision as determined by the City Manager, or designee. 4. The agreement shall include a schematic diagram that shows that the cafe, and platform if applicable, comply with this policy and the City Code. Except for cafes on City Plaza, the design shall include all existing streetscape amenities and utility features (such as valves and manholes) within eight feet (8') of the proposed cafe. 5. Except for cafes located on the street, the agreement shall be issued from February 1 through January 31. The initial agreement may be less than the one year, but shall expire on January 31. 6. The agreement shall be recorded at the cafe owner's expense. Operation of Sidewalk Cafes 1. Advertising shall not be permitted in the sidewalk cafe area except for the name of the establishment on chairs, tables, umbrellas or other amenities, as approved by the City. 2. No blockage of building entrances or exits is permitted in a sidewalk cafe area. 3. Additional restroom capacity may be required to comply with local building and housing codes. 4. Occupancy limits are determined asset forth in the City building code. 5. No additional parking is required for the operation of a sidewalk cafe. 6. Sidewalk cafes are subject to annual inspections and may be inspected at any other time at the City's discretion. 7. The sidewalk cafe owner is responsible for trash removal and shall maintain the area and surrounding six feet (6') in a clean and litter free manner during all hours of operation. 8. All sidewalk cafes must meet the accessibility standards of City, State, and federal law. 9. All outdoor heating units must be approved by the Fire Department. Usable Sidewalk Cafe Area In the CB -10 zone with the exception of City Plaza, a sidewalk cafe area may not extend onto the sidewalk in a manner that will not allow a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway on the side of the cafe that is parallel to the building. The eight -foot (8') unobstructed walkway does not apply to cafes located on the street. Cafes located on Washington Street, between Clinton Street and Linn Street, must be detached from the building face and there must be a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway between the building face and the side of the cafe. 2. In City Plaza, there must be a minimum of six feet (6) of unobstructed walkway between the side of the cafe and an elevated planter if the cafe abuts the building. If the cafe does not abut the building, the cafe may abut a planter if there is a minimum of six feet (6) of unobstructed walkway between the cafe and the building face and six feet (6) of walkway along any other side of the cafe opposite of the planter. 3. In the CB -2 and CB -5 zones, the minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed sidewalk is not required if the existing sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width. If the sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width, a sidewalk cafe may not extend into or encompass in any manner the existing sidewalk and may not impede pedestrian traffic. 4. A sidewalk cafe area may not be located in the street corner area defined by building line extended to the street and no closer than ten feet (10') from an alley. However, a cafe may be located between two feet (2') and ten feet (10') from an alley if the fencing located within ten feet (10') is a type that is less than twenty percent (20%) solid. 5. A sidewalk cafe may not extend beyond the building line extended, except for those in a planter. 6. A sidewalk cafe serving alcohol shall be contiguous with a side of the building wherein the establishment is located. The contiguous requirement may be satisfied by a five foot (6) wide pathway connecting the building to the cafe. The pathway area shall be under the control of the establishment and is subject to the annual fee. 7. A cafe on the sidewalk that does not abut the building must be located a minimum of two feet (2') from the curb as measured by the City, except for unique circumstances (such as being adjacent to a street cafe) as determined solely by the City Manager or designee. Public Amenities and Utilities 1. Except as provided herein, a sidewalk cafe shall not utilize or encompass any public amenities, including, but not limited to, benches, seats, tables, trash receptacles, public art, bike racks, water spigots, kiosks, posting pillars, and pergolas. The City Manager or designee may approve the utilization, encompassing, or relocation of a public amenity on the condition that the cafe owner pay all associated costs. 2. A sidewalk cafe may encompass trees, tree rings, light poles, water valves, manholes, and stormwater intakes but shall not interfere with their care, maintenance or operation. Access shall be available to the City for their care and maintenance. 3. Amenities, including trees, tree rings and light poles, shall be considered obstructions for purposes of the requirements of the eight foot (8) unobstructed walkway. 4. The amenities used in the sidewalk cafe area shall be maintained in good condition. 5. Upon payment of the electricity fee, the cafe owner may use the City's electrical outlet but only for lights. Fencing (For Cafes Not on the Street) 1. Except during the term of the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28 thereafter and except as provided herein for cafes located on City Plaza and on Washington St., the area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. During the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28, said area may be delineated by ropes or some other suitable method which shall be detectable by pedestrians who are visually impaired. 2. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 3. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the approved fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable and shall not block or obstruct emergency exits. If ropes or some other suitable method is used, tables, chairs and other items shall be removed at the end of the day's operation, and the sidewalk cafe area shall be restored to its normal condition as a pedestrian way. 4. The cafe owner shall be responsible for any damages to the public right of way caused by the placement of any anchored fencing. 5. Planters with flowers and/or other vegetation are allowed as an alternative to temporary and fencing to delineate the sidewalk cafe. The design of the planters shall be approved by the City Manager, or designee, subject to the following limitations: a. The planters shall, at the cafe owner's option, be either fastened to each other or removed from the sidewalk or City Plaza at the end of the day's operation along with the tables, chairs, and other items. b. The planters shall not be less than twenty-seven inches (27") or more than thirty-six inches (36") in height excluding plantings. c. The planters shall be either metal or have a metal frame. 6. Anchored fencing on a concrete platform or within a planter may remain year around. 7. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, anchored fencing is prohibited in City Plaza and on Washington Street, from Clinton Street to Linn Street. All fencing in those locations must be approved by the City Manager, or designee. All 4 (four) sides of the approved fence must be connected to one another to prevent movement of the fencing and said connection must be approved by the City Engineer or designee. Platforms (For Cafes Not on the Street) Sidewalk cafes may be located on a platform on top of a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee determines there is excessive slope in the sidewalk and approves the design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. 2. Sidewalk cafes may be located on a concrete platform in the right of way that is not a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee approves the concrete design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. Fencing shall not be more than three feet (3') in height, measured from the plane on which the chair sits to the top of the railing, excluding finials. Planters A sidewalk cafe may encompass or utilize an elevated planter if the proposed cafe meets the following criteria, as determined solely by the City: a. It does not interfere with pedestrian movement. b. It does not adversely affect drainage. c. It does not adversely affect public or city utilities. d. It does not adversely affect trees, shrubs or other plantings. e. It enhances the appearance of the surrounding area, and if in City Plaza, it enhances the use of City Plaza. f. It does not interfere with the functionality of any other existing sidewalk cafe. g. It is not otherwise contrary to public interest. 2. If utilizing two planters, the area between the planters shall be included in the sidewalk cafe area but need not be delineated as such unless tables and chairs are present. 3. With the consent of the adjacent property owner and first floor tenants, if any, the cafe may extend beyond the building line extended if the distance between the planter and the building line extended is less than ten feet (10'). The cafe may extend beyond additional building lines extended with the consent of those property owners and first floor tenants, if any. 4. The cafe owner shall pay all costs associated with the cafe including, but not limited to, the cost to move water mains and water service lines, to remove and plant vegetation, to move electrical outlets, and to cut and restore the limestone. 5. The City may require the cafe owner to add plantings within the cafe area at the cafe owner's cost. 6. There are a limited number of planters, and cafes in planters will entail a substantial financial investment. In order to address these two opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe in the planter for the following two cafe seasons assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in planters. Cafe owners need to obtain the consent of adjacent property owner(s) and first floor tenant(s) only before entering the easement agreement for the first of the three-year, priority period. The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. The lottery for planters will be conducted in the same manner as the lottery for cafes in the street. Cafes on the Street 1. An establishment cannot operate a cafe in the street if there is sufficient room on the sidewalk for a cafe with an area of at least one -hundred twenty square feet (120 sq. ft.). 2. There shall be a minimum four feet (4') buffer on either end of the cafe for safety reasons. These buffers shall be established and maintained by the City and may be used for moped parking and/or bicycle parking. The buffer is subject to the annual fee. As used in this policy, the term sidewalk cafe area does not include the 4 -foot buffer. 3. The sidewalk cafe area may not include the portion of the parking space beyond the building line extended. The 4 -foot buffer may be located beyond the building line extended. 4. Cafes, including the 4 -foot buffer, in each block face cannot utilize more than thirty percent (30%) of the total parking spaces in that block face. 5. Cafes cannot be located in loading zones. 6. Cafes cannot be set up before April 1 and shall be removed no later than the Tuesday following the last University of Iowa home football game. Cafes may have to be removed temporarily at the cafe owner's sole expense to accommodate an event on the street permitted by the City (e.g., criterium). 7. The portion of the cafe located on the street shall be on a platform. The design features of the platform shall be submitted with the application and the design shall be stamped by a professional engineer or architect. The platform shall not impede drainage in the street gutter. 8. The area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 9. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the anchored fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable. 10. The fee shall be a combination of the following four (4) fees: a) the annual square footage ,.right of way" fee for the portion of the cafe located on the sidewalk and the area satisfying the contiguous requirement; b) the annual square footage "platform" fee for portion of the cafe located on the street and any portion that is be located on the sidewalk; c) the daily fee for each parking space regardless of the amount of the parking space that the cafe utilizes; and d) bollard fee. 11. There is no guarantee that the City will continue to authorize cafes in the street. The cafe agreement will include a paragraph in substantial compliance with the following: Cafe owner further acknowledges and agrees that no property right is conferred by this agreement for the use of portions of the public right-of-way, that the City is not empowered to grant permanent or perpetual use of its right-of-way for private purposes, that the City may order said locations and/or uses within the right-of-way to cease and desist if, for any reason, the City determines that said right-of-way is needed for a public use and should be cleared of any and all obstructions, and that the cafe owner shall not be entitled to any compensation should the City elect to do so. The "30% limitation" limits the number of establishments that will be allowed to operate a cafe on the street, and cafes on the street will entail a substantial financial investment. To address these opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. The City will provide information on the lottery and the priority system on its website. Lottery. The logistics and deadlines for the lottery are as follows: • February 1. In order to be eligible for the lottery, an application with a preliminary (does not have to be drawn by a professional) schematic diagram must be submitted by this date. Applications received after February 15t will be considered on a first come, first serve basis and will be denied if there is no available space. • February 15. If there are competing applications, staff will notify the applicants by this date whether they have been selected to enter into easement agreements. Competing applications mean when there are applications for more than 30% of the parking spaces within a block face. The City will conduct a lottery to select applicants. • March 15. The applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date, which is dependent upon staff approval of its schematic diagram (drawn by a professional) and payment of all fees (except the parking space fee that will not be known until the platform is installed). If an applicant does not meet the March 15 deadline, staff will notify the next applicant that it is eligible for a cafe on the street. 0 April 15. The next applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date Note: If one of these dates falls on a weekend, the applicable deadline will be the following Monday. Priority. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe within the same block face for the following two calendar years, assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in the street (see Paragraph 12 above). The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. Fees 1. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located directly on the public right-of-way: $5.00 per square foot. 2. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located on a structure/platform (including concrete platform) placed on the public right-of-way: $10.00 per square foot. 3. Annual fee for the area of the sidewalk cafe utilizing an elevated planter on the public right- of-way: $10.00 per square foot. The annual fee for the portion of a "planter" sidewalk cafe that is not located on the elevated planter: $5.00 per square foot. 4. Annual fee for a sidewalk cafe located on the street: $5.00 per square foot for the area located on the sidewalk plus $10.00 square foot for the area located on the platform on the street plus daily fee for each parking space as set forth in the City Code (presently, $20.00 per day) for every day the platform is on the street plus bollard fee. 5. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place anchored fencing in the public right-of-way: $200.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the right-of-way, and planter if applicable, is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 6. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place a structure/platform on the public right-of-way, regardless of whether anchored fencing is used: $500.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the structure/platform is removed, and the right -of way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 7. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which utilize an elevated planter or placement of a concrete platform in the public right-of-way: $1,000.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the platform or concrete is removed, and the right-of-way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 8. If the initial easement agreement is for less than one season, the fees listed in Paragraphs 1-4 above shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. 9. Electricity fee for using electrical outlet for lights for cafes in planters: $45 per year 10. Bollard Fee: Actual cost of the bollards based on a five (5) year life cycle plus one (1) hour labor at the MW II pay grade to install, maintain, and remove the 4 -foot buffer. If the platform is removed temporarily during the year, the labor fee is assessed again when the platform is reinstalled. A minimum of two (2) bollards will be required, and the City shall determine if additional bollards are needed. 11. Recording fee for the easement agreement: Actual fee charged by County Recorder. City Manager The City Manager is authorized to approve any other provision or require any other restriction regarding the use of the public right of way by a sidewalk cafe that is not inconsistent with this policy or the City Code. Section 10-3-3 of the City Code A. Sidewalk cafes are permitted in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). B. No person shall operate a sidewalk cafe without executing an easement agreement. C. Each sidewalk cafe applicant shall file an application for an easement agreement with the Public Works Department, on forms provided by the City. D. The City Manager, or designee, shall either grant or deny the application within thirty (30) days of the application being filed. If the application is granted, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to enter into a public right of way easement agreement. If the application is denied, the applicant may appeal to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Council, and the appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. The City retains the right to limit the number of sidewalk cafes. E. After execution of an easement agreement, the City Manager, or designee, shall retain the right to terminate the easement agreement but only after written notice of violation has been given and the time to cure the violation has expired. Grounds for termination of the easement agreement shall include, but not be limited to, repeated violations of the state and liquor control laws, violations of the easement agreement, and creating a safety hazard, health hazard and/or public nuisance under state or local law. Additionally, the City Manager, or designee, retains the right to terminate the easement agreement and direct removal of sidewalk cafe operations if there is a substantial and reasonable need for use of the public right of way for a valid public purpose. The cafe owner has the right to appeal a decision to terminate the agreement to the City Council. The appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. F. The easement agreement, at a minimum, shall require the cafe operator to provide a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City, and shall agree to hold the City harmless against any and all liability arising from or relating to the operation of the sidewalk cafe or the location of the cafe on the public right of way including, but not limited to, all claims arising from occurrences or accidents within the sidewalk cafe area, including the walkway through a cafe. G. Sidewalk cafes shall operate only between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight. H. Food and beverages must be available for service to patrons in a sidewalk cafe during all hours of operation. Sidewalk cafes shall not operate when the restaurant kitchen is closed. I. A sidewalk cafe serving alcoholic beverages shall have an employee monitoring the area at all times during the hours alcohol is consumed and shall dispense any alcoholic beverage under state and local law J. Amplified sound equipment shall not be permitted. K. The operation of any sidewalk cafe shall be inconformity with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. M. All fees for the operation of a sidewalk cafe shall be set by resolution. N. The City Manager is authorized to establish administrative rules not inconsistent with any ordinance or policy adopted by the City Council. A copy of the policy and rules shall be on file with the City Clerk and available of the City website. Item Number: 15. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution authorizing the installation of speed humps on Hickory Trail, between First Avenue and Tamarack Trail. Prepared By: Sarah Walz, Associate Transportation Planner Reviewed By: Kent Ralston, Transportation Planner Jason Havel, City Engineer Tracy Hightshoe, Director, Neighborhood and Development Services Fiscal Impact: Funding for traffic calming projects is allocated from a line item in the CI P (S3816). Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Aerial view with approximate speed hump locations and traffic data Correspondence Resolution Executive Summary: Residents of Hickory Trail have successfully completed the City of Iowa City's Traffic Calming process. Data collection determined that the street qualifies for the program based on speeds. Staff discussed traffic calming with the residents of Hickory Trail at a meeting held on November 14th. The consensus of residents who attended the meeting was to move forward with a request for speed humps and survey residents of the street. On November 24th, a survey was sent to residents of Hickory Trail in order to measure support for the proposed speed humps. A map including the approximate location of the proposed speed humps was included with the survey. In all, 83% of occupied residences along Hickory Trail responded to the survey. Of those household that responded, 79% indicated support for speed humps. Background /Analysis: In September (2019) residents of Hickory Trail submitted a qualifying petition to be part of the Traffic Calming Program. Later that fall, the City Council directed staff to include Tamarack Trail in the collection of traffic speed and volume data and to offer traffic calming to residents of Tamarack without the required petition. To qualify for the Traffic Calming Program, the 85th percentile speed of traffic must exceed the posted speed limit by 5 MPH. Traffic data was collected at three locations on Hickory Trail: between Cyprus Court and Bluffwood Drive, between Bluffwood Drive and Evergreen Court, and between Evergreen Court and Hickory Place. Details of the data collection are provided on the attachment (see Aerial View). Hickory Trail is approximately 2,400 feet long and collects traffic from three cul-de-sacs and a loop street --Cyprus Court, Bluffwood Drive, Evergreen Court, and Hickory Place --in addition to Tamarack Trail. While the planned extension of Tamarack Trail will provide an outlet to Scott Boulevard, the 45 residential households located along the four interior streets rely on Hickory Trail for access to their street. Hickory Trail has a pavement width of 28 feet, which is the current city standard for collector streets. While this allows for parking along both sides of the street, the concentration and consistency of parking is not sufficient to effectively slow traffic. Block lengths and the frequency of intersections can also influence speed. While side streets intersect with Hickory Trail at fairly regular intervals along the north, these low volume T -intersections do not produce enough regular traffic to effectively calm speeds on Hickory Trail. Staff reviewed the speed data and street context with the City Engineer, Streets Department, and the Police and Fire Departments to consider appropriate ways to address the speeding issue. Edge striping, traffic circles, and bulb -outs were all considered. After review, staff concluded that speed humps would be the most safe and effective means for lowering speeds. A meeting with residents who live along Hickory Trail and Tamarack Trail was held on November 14th to discuss the residents' perceptions of the traffic and the potential options for lowering speeds. Staff presented speed and traffic count information and reviewed options for traffic calming that had been considered by staff. At the meeting, residents of Hickory Trail supported speed humps and requested to move forward with a survey. Residents of Tamarack Trail indicated that they did not wish to move forward with traffic calming. On November 24th, a survey was sent to residents of Hickory Traill to determine if there was support for speed humps. The mailing included all residential properties with frontage on Hickory Trail except for the final two homes at the eastern end of the road. These two addresses have driveway access from Tamarack Trail and had been grouped as part of the consideration for traffic calming on Tamarack. All households in the 16 -unit apartment building at 2601 Hickory Trail were included in the survey. In all, surveys were sent to 50 addresses: 3 mailings were returned by the US Post Office as vacant properties; 39 households responded to the survey before the deadline. That is an 83% response rate (39 of 47). Of those households that responded, 31 indicated support for the proposed traffic calming; 8 did not support the proposed traffic calming. That is a 79% approval rate (31 of 39). Note that residents of the four side streets that feed into Hickory Trail were not part of the neighborhood meeting or the survey process. The traffic calming process is designed to allow the residents of properties that directly experience speeding to discuss their perceptions and concerns and then to measure whether there is enough agreement/support among these residents to forward a request for consideration by the City Council. The Traffic Calming Policy provides opportunity for residents on adjacent streets to provide input directly to the City Council at the time you review the traffic calming request. On January 5, staff posted signs along both sides of Hickory Trail: two signs near the intersection of Cypress Court and two signs near Calder Park. This is to provide notice to the larger neighborhood and an opportunity for the public to share input with the City Council. With the approval of City Council, staff will move forward with the installation of speed humps as proposed. Installation would be scheduled for the 2020 construction season. ATTACHMENTS: Description Aerial View Correnspondence Resolution Hickory Trail Between Cypress Court and Bluffwood Drive Westbound Average speed is 28 MPH 15% of drivers are exceeding 32 MPH Eastbound Average speed is 27 MPH 15% of drivers are exceeding 32 MPH The average number of vehicles passing through this location during the study period was 856/day. Approximate speed hump locations Possible speed humps locations shown below are spaced approximately 200-300 feet apart. This is the ideal spacing to encourage drivers to adopt a consistent speed. Between Bluffwood Drive and Evergreen Court Westbound Average speed is 29 MPH 15% of drivers are exceeding 33.5 MPH Eastbound Average speed is 25 MPH 15% of drivers are exceeding 30 MPH The average number of vehicles passing through this location during the study period was 730/day. Between Evergreen Court and Hickory Place Westbound Average speed is 27 MPH 15% of drivers are exceeding 30 MPH Eastbound Average speed is 27 MPH 15% of drivers are exceeding 31 MPH The average number of vehicles passing through this loca- tion during the study period was 550/day. Sarah Walz From: Marian Karr <hawkeyeg3@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 10:33 AM To: Sarah Walz Subject: Hickory Trail Speed Bumps A RI K Dear Ms. Walz I oppose the installation of speed bumps on Hickory Trail. I find them to be an unnecessary at this time. i live one house off Hickory Trail and use it all the time as it is our only access out of the area. I have not witnessed any excessive speed as other Iowa City streets such as Glendale east of 7th avenue which has no speed bumps. I believe this request is a result of the neighborhoods reaction to the extension and development of Tamarack. Once that street goes through I feel the traffic on Hickory Trail will actually lessen. After that project is complete the subject of speed bumps can be revisited. On a related note I understand the policy is initiated by those living on the particular street, that are "affected".This policy totally ignores all the other houses on the side streets that have to use HickoryTrail as it is the only access in and out of the subdivision. I believe the entire subdivision is "affected" and should have been contacted. This policy does not take into consideration property owners impacted directly and have to use this street to access their property. Thank you for accepting my objection. George Karr 813 Bluffwood Dr. Sarah Walz From: Bradley Ruth <bradleyruth@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 10:19 AM To: Sarah Walz Subject: Hickory Trail traffic calming To: City Council From: Ruth Bradley, Hickory Trail resident Unfortunately I will be unable to attend the February 4 city council meeting which will address the traffic calming request from residents on Hickory Trail. I did want to lend my support to the plan for speed humps as a traffic calming measure on our street. Data supports the residents complaints of consistent and persistent speeding. Thank you for your consideration. Ruth Bradley 2669 Hickory Trail Iowa City Sent from Yahoo Mail for !Pad Sarah Walz From: Casko, John S <john-casko@uiowa.edu> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2020 2:40 PM To: Sarah Walz Subject: traffic calming Hickory Trail Sa ra h, I am writing to support the placement of speed humps on Hickory Trail. It seems to me that choosing between the safety of children and the inconvenience of speed bumps should be a no brainer for the Council. i appreciate the opportunity to provide input. John John S. Casko, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D. Professor Emeritus B.F. and Helen E. Dewel Endowed Chair in Clinical Orthodontics Emeritus The University of Iowa Ph 319-337-5269 John-casko@uiowa.edu Sarah Walz From: Sent: To: Subject: czarlson@mchsi.com Monday, February 3, 2020 12:39 PM Streets for People Traffic calming measures #1� Late Handouts Distributed 2 — '-I- - ZC) (Date) �Il;st� I am absolutely and emphatically OPPOSED to any traffic calming measures on Tamarack Trail and Hickory Trail. I do not believe they are necessary at this point. If 15% of people going five miles over the speed limit is the criterion, then I would be hard pressed to think of any street in the entire city that wouldn't warrant speed bumps! Additionally, I don't believe this really has anything to do with the speed of traffic on these two streets. This is about some residents, opposed to the extension of Tamarack Trail (which was recently approved), who want to ensure that the "new" people don't drive south through the existing neighborhood, but instead are strongly encouraged to leave the neighborhood by way of Scott Boulevard. In my opinion, this whole push is really just NIMBYism. I'm sorry I can't attend the meeting where you'll be deciding this, but I wanted to make sure my opinion was registered. Please vote against this proposal! Susan Carlson 1021 Tamarack Trail P.S. A hearty LOL on the choice of email address, by the way. I don't know if the irony was intentional or not, but it made me laugh. However, a more honest designation might have been "StreetsForSomePeople" Sarah Walz From: Jonathan Carlson <jonathan.c.carlson@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2020 2:07 PM Late Handouts Distributed To: Streets for People Subject: traffic calming on Hickory Trail 2--4-2-0 (Date) ZFR,t55 Hello, I live on Tamarack Trail, which means that I drive down Hickory Trail at least twice a day to go back and forth to work. I also regularly walk my dog along Hickory Trail (at least 5 times per week). I'm also a frequent visitor, with my 3 -year-old granddaughter, to Calder Park (on Hickory Trail).. We walk back and forth. I don't think there is any significant problem involving vehicles traveling at excessive speeds on Hickory Trail. I feel absolutely safe when I walk along the street and cross it with my dog or with my granddaughter. I drive it at all times of the day, and I have rarely encountered anyone traveling at an excessive speed or driving in a careless manner. At one point in the past there was someone who left the neightborhood between 4:30 and 5:00 am (when I often walk the dog) and would always drive much too fast. But I haven't noticed that car in some time, and I suspect it was a teenager heading to some kind of early morning athletic practice. In my experience, the vast majority of drivers in the neighborhood are considerate and law-abiding and stay within the speed limit. That leads me to the view that there is no need for traffic -calming measures. If such measures consist of speed bumps in the road, I would also say that they are likely to be more of an inconvenience (even a hazard) than a benefit. The hazard would be to bicycle riders and their bikes. The inconvenience would be to everyone. Sincerely, Jonathan Carlson 16, Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Associate Transportation Planner, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356- 5239 Resolution no. 20-31 Resolution authorizing the installation of speed humps on Hickory Trail, between First Avenue and Tamarack Trail. Whereas, the City Council has established a traffic calming program for the City of Iowa City for the purpose of considering neighborhood traffic calming projects; and Whereas, the residents of Hickory Trail have successfully completed the traffic calming process according to the City Council's approved procedure; and Whereas, a neighborhood survey has been conducted in accordance with the approved traffic calming program and a 79% majority of respondents indicated they are in favor of speed humps; and Whereas, the City Council finds said proposal to be in the public interest and is consistent with its adopted traffic calming program. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The proposal for speed humps on Hickory Trail is hereby approved. 2. City staff is directed to proceed with the installation of speed humps on Hickory Trail, between First Avenue and Tamarack Trail. Passed and approved this 5th day of February 2020 Br Teague, Mayor Approved by Attest: Kellie Fruehing,- City Jerk City Attorney's Office Resolution No. Page 2 It was moved by Salih and seconded by Mims the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: % Bergus x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague % Thomas % Weiner Item Number: 16. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 4, 2020 Resolution adopting an assessment schedule of unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Prepared By: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: No impact Recommendations: Staff: Approval C •uu •I ►%1 Attachments: Resolution w/ Exhibits A and B Executive Summary: This resolution is to adopt an assessment schedule for unpaid mowing, property clean-up, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair. Background /Analysis: The City has the authority under Iowa Code §364.136 to assess the nuisance abatement costs in the same manner as a property tax. This resolution allows the City Clerk to certify to the Johnson County Treasurer the abatement cost to be assessed against the property. This assessment is being pursued only after the City took many steps to resolve the matter. The City notified the homeowners to abate the nuisance (for example, to remove snow from the sidewalk) and after the homeowner did not take action to abate the nuisance, the City abated the nuisance and billed the owner. After being billed at least twice, these owners still have not paid the abatement costs. The City has sent a letter to the homeowner giving them notice that this resolution would be on the agenda, a copy of which is attached to the resolution. No interest will be charged if the owner pays within 30 days of the first required publication. Attached as an exhibit to the resolution is a list of the properties that will be assessed and the amount that will be assessed. There are two properties that have not been billed twice as is typically done. One is 322 E. Bloomington, a property City inspectors have spent a few years working with the owner trying to get it cleaned up. The Court recently issued an order authorizing the City to clean it up, and it was cleaned up two weeks ago. It is staff's understanding that the owner has a purchase agreement to sell the property in April 2020, and the property needs to be assessed prior to closing. The second is 905 N. Governor. In 2017 the Court entered an order allowing the City to clean up the property. The City chose not to assess the property for the clean up but rather to have an in rem judgment entered against the property because it was owner occupied and staff believed the owner could not afford the large tax bill. The owner has died and the house is in foreclosure. There is no estate, and the City's in rem judgment will be extinguished in the foreclosure whereas a tax assessment will not be extinguished. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Exhibit A Exhibit B Prepared by: Kellie Freehling, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240-319-356-5040 RESOLUTION NO. 20-32 Resolution adopting an assessment schedule of unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Whereas, the City Clerk has filed with the City Clerk an assessment schedule providing the amount to be assessed against certain lots for the actual unpaid abatement costs of mowing, cleaning up property, removing snow, repairing sidewalks, and repairing stop boxes in the same manner as property taxes; Whereas, said schedule is attached as Exhibit A to this resolution and incorporated herein by this reference; Whereas, Iowa Code § 364.1313 authorizes the City Council to assess against the property said abatement costs in the same manner as property taxes; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the property owners listed in Exhibit A have received a written notice of the date and time of the public hearing on the adoption of said assessment schedule, in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit B. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Exhibit A is adopted as the final assessment schedule pursuant to Iowa Code § 384.60(1). The amounts listed in Exhibit A for unpaid mowing charges, clean-up property charges, snow removal charges, sidewalk repair charges and stop box repair charges are confirmed and levied against the properties listed in Exhibit A. All unpaid assessments not paid within thirty (30) days after the first publication of the final assessment schedule shall bear interest at the rate of 9% per annum, commencing on March 19, 2020. Assessments are payable at Johnson Country Treasurer, 13 South Dubuque Street, Iowa City, Iowa. Until March 18, 2020 payment may be made at the City Clerk, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa. The City Clerk is hereby directed to certify the schedule as set out in Exhibit A to the Treasurer of Johnson County, Iowa for collection in the same manner as property taxes. The assessment cannot be paid in installments. Resolution No. 20-32 Page 2 The City Clerk is further directed to publish notice of the schedule once each week for two consecutive weeks in the manner provided in Iowa Code § 362.3, the first publication of which shall be not more than fifteen (15) days from the date of filing of the final assessment schedule. Passed and approved this 4th day of February 2020. Approved by ATTEST� (' 'k 5 ^l G City Jerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Weiner the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there was: AYES: F4 sue\Ord&Resta 6ataR..A.o NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Exhibit A _ CITY OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters - Water Lien Property Address Legal Description Parcel Number Appraised Value Property Owner Service(s) Rendered Date of Cost of Invoice Senice(s) Service If Balance Outstanding 905 N GOVERNOR ST BACONS SO OF BLK 1 DEWEYS ADDITION LOT 12 1003483012 177 756.00MERISEP71MMMEND Coon Order Chan Up 9M01 $ 2,020.77 74316 2,02D.77 922 KIRKW0OD AVE WILSON & LANTZ ADDITION 5 SOD OF E 80' LOTS 3 & 4 1015190009 $ 230,190.09 CIE OPERATIONS LLC Weed Removal 61912019 $ 182.00 69386 $ 182.00 1317 FRANKLIN ST C R REGAN ADDITION N 69 LOT 7 1014317003 $ 112,610.00 DAVIS, JAMES CAMERON Weed Removal 7/18/2D19 $ 203.0D 71403 $ 203.D6 73 HICKORY HEIGHTS W HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9 1002428013 $ 719,900.00 HONG, DEREK Weed Removal 61412019 $ 512.00 69392 $ 512.00 1903 MORNINGSIDE DR IMORNINGSIDE ADDITION LOTS 15 & 116 BLK 4 1011454001 $ 228,760.OD MORROW, TODD A Sidewalk Repair 81712019 $ 452.56 59754 452.56 1819 HIGH Sr SIR 11-79-6 COM NW COR OF LOT 12, ADRIANS IST ADD; W 70.5' 1011460001 $ 225,070.00 PEAK INVESTMENTS, LLC Weed Removal 1011EV2019 $ 223.00 71413 $ 223.00 1152 HAMPTON CT VILLAGE GREEN ADDITION PART %I LOT 18 101'3401002 $ 317 760.00 PETERSON, REBECCA ANN Weed Removal 7/2312019 $ 753.00 71412 $ 753.00 1066 CAMP CARDINAL RD CARDINAL RIDGE - PART FOUR LOT 10 IOO7238001 $ 5,750.00 SSBC LLC Weed Removal 9/2312019 $ 203.00 71423 $ 203.00 2036 PIAEN VIEW DR TY'N CAE SUBDIVISION PART 3 LOT 33 1020203013 $ 189,850.OD TOLUVER, DAVID GLEN Weed Removal 10118/2019 $ 265.00 714D2 $ 265,00 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST IOWA CITY (ORIGIMALTOWN E 1/2 LOT 7 BLK 57 1010163007 $ 189,5&D.00 WILLIAMS, JAY Court Order Clan Up 112412020 $ 3,500.00 74259 $ 3,500.00 320 N GOVERNOR ST IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) S 45' OF W 80' OF N 15V OUTLOT 7 1010184009 $ 216,760.00 YOUNG, CHAD A Weed RemoVal W5/2D19 $ 203.00 71416 $ 203.0D 228 BROWN Si IOWA lm (ORIGINAL TOWN) COM SE COR OUTLOT 19; N 105'; W B0; N 60; W 90; S 35; E 27; S 38; E 8'; S 92' & E 85' TO BEG IXC 1010202011 $ 422,260.00 YU, MEI-HSIANG Weed Ren I 101115/2019 $ 203.00 71813 $ 203.00 EXHIBIT B l _ ZUR CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City. lona 52240-1826 January 28, 2020 (3 19) 356-5000 13191 3565009 FAX www.icgov.org u Property_Owner» <(Mailing_Address)) ((City)), «State» «ZIP» Dear Property Owner: This is to notify you that the City Council will be considering a resolution on February 4, 2020 that will assess against your property the cost that the City has incurred to do one of the following: unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, or stop box repair charges. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the bill. If the City Council approves the assessment against your property, the amount will be collected by the Johnson County Treasurer in the same manner as a property tax. The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 pm and is held at Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, Iowa. If you want to challenge the assessment, you are advised to come to the City Council meeting. You may also submit a letter or email to the City Council. The mailing address is: City Council, % City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 and the email address is council((-iowa-city.org Please note that all communication with City Council is a public record. If you pay the amount due in full before the City Council meeting, the resolution will not include an assessment against your property. You can make the payment by mailing or coming in person to the City Clerk's office, 410 East Washington Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. If property is assessed and the amount is not paid within the specified 30 days, interest will accrue at a rate set by the City Council. If you have any questions about the resolution, please contact my office at 356-5041. Sincerely, Kellie Fruehling City Clerk Enc. Copy to: Accounting Division-w/enc. EXHIBIT A CITY OF IOWA CfTY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters = Water Lien Property Address L at DesaiEd, Parcel Number Appraised Value Property Owner Services) Rendered Date of Cost of Invoice Service(s) Service # Balance Outstanding 1542 DICKENSON LN SOUTH POINTE ADDITION T 5 LOT B4 1023376010 $ 188,520.00 ARMED, BAKAR ARMED, AMANI Weed Remonval 9/23/2019 $ 282.00 71424 $ 28200 1929 FRIENDSHIP 57" EAST IOWA CITY E 75' LOT 1 B1014113001 $ 126,620.00 BELTZ, ELIZABETH Skkwak Repair 8/30(2019 E 278.47 70601 # 278.47 905 N GOVERNOR ST BACONS SO OF BLK Y DEWEVS AD N LOT 12 1003483012 177 750.00 3511107171(Almu,Ell D Court Order Clean Up 9/30/201 2,020.77 74318 2,020.n 1216 DOLEN PL 1214 & 1216 DOLEN PLACE OONDOMINI 1216 DOLEN PLACE 111 1017387001 $ 158,140.00 CHE4, ZONCMAN PETER CHEN,(UNIT )BAD FANG Weed Removal 10/6/2014 # 182.00 71809 $ 182.00 922 KIRKWOOD AVE WILSON & LANTZ ADDITION S 100' OF E 8WILON4 & 4 3015190009 $ 230,190.00 CIE OPERATIONS LLC Weed Removal 6/9/2019 $ 182.00 69366 $ 182.00 1317 FRANKLIN ST C R REGAN ADDITION N 60' LOT 7 1014317003 $ 112,610.00 DAVIS, JAMES CAMERON Weed Removal 7/1812019 $ 203.00 71403 $ 203.00 1122 COTTONWOOD AVE KIRKWOOD HEIGHTS ADDITION LOT 97 1014352014 $ 173,950.00 FOBIAN, CRAIG A Weed Removal 8/22/2019 $ 203. 203.00 73 HICKORY HEIGHTS LN HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9 1002428013 $ 719,900.00 HONG, DEREK Weed Removal 6/4/201 12.00 69392 $ 51200 4 REGAL LN LAKESIDE ADDITION LOT 57 23409004 $ IOWA CORRIDOR PROPERTIES, 137 570.00 Weed Removal t 19/2019 $ 243.00 71408 $ 243.00 3703 ELGIN DR LINDEMANN SUBDIVISION - PART ONE L0T9 90 005 $ AMATO, DANIEL 256,980.00 W oval 10/1(2019 $ 381.00 71812 $ 381.00 213 W BENTON ST LIGHT RIDGE LLC 1016193 $ 153,900.00 LIGHT RIDGE LLC eed Removal 8/14/2019 $ 265.00 71405 $ 265.00 1903 MORNINGSIDE DR MORNINGSIDE ADDITION L0TS 15 & 16 SLK 4 1011454001 P1,228,760-00 MORROW, TODD A Sdewak Repair 8/7/2019 $ 452.56 69754 $ 452.56 1130 SUNSET ST BRYN MAWR HEIGHTS PART EIGHT LOT 241 1016357001 $ NI NGUYEN, 211, .00 Weed Removal 9(5/2019 # 315.00 71441 $ 315.00 1112 N DODGE ST Sr. MATTHIAS 1ST ADDITION LAT 5 & W 18'r LOT 6 BLK 4 1002334004 # 195,080. NAN I TRllYEN Weed Removal 8/22 & 915 $ 505.00 71429 $ 505.00 1819 HIGH ST SIR 11-79-6 COM NW COR OF LOT 12, ADRIANS IST ADD; W 70.5' 3011460001 # 22 .00 P TMENTS, LLC Weed Removal 10/18/2019 $ 223.00 71413 $ 223.00 603 S IST AVE EAST IOWA CITY E 1/2 LOT 1 etl(3 101411600 PEREZ, D K G 50,160.00 Snow Removal 3/11(2019 $ 190.00 69027 $ 190.00 1152 HAMPTON CT VILLAGE GREEN ADDITION PART)I LOT IB 101 2 $ 317,760.00 PETERSON, REBEt5CA ANN Weed Removml 7/23/2019 $ 753.00 71412 $ 753.00 1218 SANTA FE DR SOUTHWEST ESTATES - PART SIX LOT 104 113402008 $ SESAG, JULIEN 355,700.00 Weed Removal 9/5/2019 $ 323.00 71420 1 $ 323.00 703 N DUBUQUE ST IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) S 70' OUTLOT 33 & BEG SE LOT 33; 5 30'; W 110'; N 30'; E 110' TO BEG (VACATED ST) 1010203003 $ ALPHA ETA CHAPTER OF SIGMA 613,150.00 CHI FRATERNITY Order Clean Up 7/1612019 $ 1,230.31 71442 1 $ 1,230.31 1066 CAMP CARDINAL RD CARDINAL RIDGE - PART FOUR LOT 10 3007238001 $ 5,750.00 SSBC LLC Weed oval 9123/2019 $ 203.00 71423 $ 203.00 2036 PLAEN VIEW DR TY'N CAE SUBDIVISION PART 3 LOT 33 1020203013 $ 189,850.00 TOLLIVER, DAVID (YEN Weed Rem 10/18/2019 $ 265.00 71402 $ 265.00 918 E JEFFERSON ST A W 14 W U N 150' TO PT 14T E OF W/L OUTL , E 34.7" TO PT 182.7" E OF W/L OUTLOT 5; 5150' TO PT 18 EOF SW COR OUTLOT S;W 1010407011 $ 221,170.00 TRAWICK, CHARLENE ANEUA Weed Removal 7/22/2019 $ 835.00 71409 $ 635.00 1915 MUSCATINE AVE EAST IOWA CITY, SUBD 2-6 SIX 34 LOT 3 1014160004 # 288,270.00 TRCA, RANDY E SUewak Repair 912019 $ 430.72 70876 $ 430.72 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST IOWA CITY (ORIG[ WN E 1/2 LOT 7 BLK 57 1010163007 $ 189,580.00 WILLIAMS, JAY (hurt Order Clean Up 1/24 20 $ 3,500.00 74259 $ 3,500.00 320 N GOVERNOR ST IOWA CITY (D NAL TOWN) 5 45 OF W 80' OF N 750' OUTLOT 7 10101840D9 $ 216,760.00 YOUNG CHAD A Weed Removal 9/5/2019 203.00 71416 $ 20300 228 BROWN ST IOWA ORIGINAL TOWN) COM SE COROUTLOT 19; N 105'; W 80';N ;W40';S35;E27;S38';ES';592'&ESSTOBEGFXC 1010202011 $ 422,260.00 Y I MEI-HSIANG Weed Removal 10/15/2019 $ 2 00 71813 1 203.00 Exhibit A Late Handouts Distributed CITY OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters ® Water Lien Property Address Leg&LDwription Parcel Number Appraised Value Property Owner ServlCe(S) Rendered Date of Coat of Invoice Service(s) Service # ante Outstanding 1542 DIIXENSON LN SOUTH TE ADDITION -PART 5 LOT 84 1023376010 $ AHMED, BAKAR AHMED, 188,520.00 Weed Remonval 9/23/2019 $ 2 71424 $ 282.00 1929 FRIENDSHIP ST EAST IOWA C 75' LOT 1 BLK 36 1014113001 $ 128,620.00 BELTZ, ELIZABETH Sidewalk Repair 8/3012019 278.47 70601 $ 278.47 905 N GOVERNOR ST BACONS SO OF BL EYS ADDITION LOT 12 1003483012 177 750.00FOTSDER, KATHLEEN D Court Order Clean U 930 $ 2,02 .77 74318 2,020.77 1216 DOLEN PL 1214 & 1216 DOLEN P CONDOMINIUM 1216 DDLEN PLACE (UNIT B)1017387001 $ 158,140,00CHEN, ZONGXIAN PETER CHEN, KLAO FANWeed Removal 0(6)2019 $ 182.00 71609 $ 182.00 922 KIRKWOOD AVE WILSON & LANTZ ADDITION 5 ' OF E 80' LOTS 3 & 4 1015190009 $ 230,19090 CIE OPERATIONS LLC Weed Removal 6/9/2019 $ 182.00 69386 $ 182.00 1317 FRANKLIN ST C R REGAN ADDITION N 60' LOT 7 1014317003 $ 112,61090 DAVIS, JAMES CAMERON Weed Removal 7/18/2019 $ 203.00 71403 $ 203.00 1122 COTTONWOOD AVE KIRKWOOD HEIGHTS ADDITION LOT 97 1014352014 $ 173,950.00 FOBIAN, CRAIG Weed al 8/2212019 $ 203.00 71415 $ 203.00 73 HICKORY HEIGHTS LN HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9 1002428013 $ 719,900.00 HONG, DEREK Removal 61 $ 512.00 69392 $ 512.00 213 W BENTON ST LIGHT RIDGE LLC 1016193003 $ 153,900.00 LIGHT RIDGE LLC Weed Removal 8/14/2019 $ 265.00 71405 $ 265.00 1903 MORNINGSIDE DR MORNINGSIDE ADDITION LOTS 15 & 16 BLK 4 1011454001 $ 228,760.00 MORROW, TODD A Sidewalk Repair 8/7/2019 $ 452.56 69754 $ 452.56 1819 HIGH ST SIR 11-79-6 COM NW COR OF LOT 12, ADRIANS 15T RDD; W 1011460001 $ 225,070.00 PEAK INV T5, LLC Weed Removal 10/18/2019 $ 223.00 71413 $ 223.00 603 S 15T AVE EAST IOWA CITY E 1/2 LOT 8LK 3 101 6001 $ PEREZ, K G 50,160.00 Snow Removal 3)11/2019 $ 190.00 69027 $ 190.00 1152 HAMPTON CT VILLAGE GREEN ADDITION PART XI LOT 18 1013401 $ 317,760.00 RSON, REBECCA ANN Weed Removal 7/23/2019 $ 753.00 75412 $ 753.00 1066 CAMP CARDINAL RD CARDINAL RIDGE - PART FOUR LOT 10 1007238001 5,75 SSBC LLC Weed Removal 9/23/2019 $ 203.00 71423 $ 203.00 2036 PLAEN VIEW DR TYM CAE SUBDIVISION PART 3 LOT 33 1020203013 $ 1 0.00 TOLLIVER, DAVID GLEN Weed Removal 10/18/2019 $ 265.00 71402 $ 265.00 918 E JEFFERSON ST N I50' TO PT ATE OF W/L OUTLOT 5; E 39.7' TO PT 182.7'E OF 41 L OUTLOT 5; 5 150' TO PT 18L9' E OF SW COR OUTLOT 5; W 10104 11 $ 221,170.00 TRA CHARLENE ANELIA Weed Removal 7/22/2019 $ 835,00 71409 $ 835.00 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST IOWA QTY ORIGINAL TOWN E 1/2 LOT 7 BLK 57 1 163007 $ 189,580.00 WILLIAMS, Court Order Clean Up 1124/2020 $ 3,500.00 74259 $ 3,50000 320 N GOVERNOR ST IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) S 45' OF W 80' OF N 150' OUTLOT 7 1010184009 $ 216,760'00 YOUNG, CHAD A Weed Ree Owl 9/5/2019 $ 20390 71416 $ 203.00 228 BROWN ST IOWA QTY (ORIGINAL TOWN) COM SE COR OULLOT 19; N 10,VW 80'; N 60'; W 40'; 5 35'; E 27'; 5 38'; E 8'; 5 92'& E 85' TO E CC 1010202011 $ 422,260.00 YU, MEI-HSIANG eetl Removal 10115j2019 $ 203.00 71813 $ 203.00 Late Handouts Distributed Exhibit A M. CI7Y OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters = Water Lien _ Pro Address Legal D ription Parcel Number Appraised Value Property Owner Service(s) Rendered Date of Cost of Invoice Service(s) Service If Bolan nding 1542 DICKENSON ON SOUTH POINTE MON - PART 5 LOT 84 1023376010 $ 188,520.00 AMANI AHMED, BAKAR AHMED, Weed Remonvai 9/23/2019 $ 28 1424 $ 282.00 1929 FRIENDSHIP ST EAST IOWA CITY E 7 0T 1 BLK 36 1014113001 $ 128,620.00 BELTZ, ELIZABETH Sklewalk Repair 8/30/2019 78.47 70601 $ 278.47 905 N GOVERNOR Si BACONS SD OF BLK 1 D ADDITION LOT 12 100346 012 $ 1]7 ]50.00 WENDER, KATHLEEN D Court Order Bean U 9730 2,020.77 79316 2,020.77 1216 DOLEN PL 1214 & 1216 DOLEN PLACE C OMINIUM 1216 DOLEN PLACE 1017387001 $ CHEN, ZONGXIAN PETER CHEN, 158,140.00 Weed Removal 0/6/2019 $ 182.00 71809 $ 182.00 922 KIRKWOOD AVE WILSON & IANTZ ADDITION 5 100' 0 80' LOTS 3 & 4 1015190009 $ 230,190.00 CIE OPERATIONS LLC Weed Ren nail 619/2019 $ 182.00 69386 $ 182.00 1317 FRANKLIN ST C R REGAN ADDITION N 60' LOT 7 1014317003 $ 112,610.00 DAVIS, JAMES CAMERON Weed Re 7/18/2019 $ 203.00 71403 $ 203.00 1122 COTTONWOOD AVE KIRKWOOD HEIGHTS ADDITION LOT 97 1014352014 $ 173,950.00 FOBUA, CRAIG A mwai 8)2212019 $ 203.00 71415 $ 203.00 73 HICKORY HEIGHTS LN HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9 1002428013 $ 719,900.00 HONG, DEREK eed Removal 6/4/2019 $ 512.00 69392 $ 512.00 1903 MORNINGSIDE DR MORNING5IDE ADDITION LOTS 15 & 16 BLK 4 1011454001 $ 228,760.00 MORROW, TODD A S malk Repair 817/2019 $ 452.56 69754 $ 452.56 1819 HIGH ST SIR 11-79-6 COM NW COR OF LOT 12, ADRTANS IST ADD;.5' 1011460001 $ 225,070.00 PEAK INV , LLC Weed Removal 10/1812019 $ 223.00 71413 $ 223.00 603 S IST AVE EAST IOWA CITY E 1/2 LOT I BLK 3 14116001 $ PEREZ, K G 50 160.00 Snow Removal 3/11/2019 $ 190.00 69027 $ 190.00 1152 HAMPTON CT VILLAGE GREEN ADDITION PARTX1 LOT 18 10 01002 $ 317,760.00 PEfERSON, REBECCA ANN Weed Removal 7123/2019 $ 753.00 71412 $ 753.00 1066 CAMP CARDINAL RD CARDINPL RIDGE -PART FOUR LOT 10 100723 1 $ 5,7 SSBC LLC Weed Removal 9(23/2019 $ 203.00 71473 $ 203.00 2036 PLAEN VIEW DR T^N CAE SUBDIVISION PART 3 LOT 33 102020301 ,850.00 TOLLIVER, DAVID GLEN Weed Removal 10/18/2019 $ 265.00 71402 $ 265.00 918 E JEFFERSON ST IOWA CI i Y (ORIGINAL vOWNH CUM 141.4'L OF 5W CUK OU I LU 1 5; N 150' TO PT 143'E OF W/L OLITLOT 5; E 39.7' TO PT 182.7' E OF 4119 OUTL.OT 5; 5 150' TO PT 182.9' E OF SW COR OUTLOT 5; W 41 9- TQ RFr 10 7011 $ 221,1 TRAWICK, CHARLENE ANELIA Weed Removal 7/2212019 $ 835.00 71409 $ 835.00 322 E BLOOMINGTON ST IOWA CM (ORIGINAL TOWN) E 1/2 LOT 7 BLK 57 10163007 $ I89,580m0dS1 1 ]AY Court Order Clean Up 1/24/2020 $ 3,500.00 74259 $ 3,500.00 320 N GOVERNOR ST IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) 5 45' OF W 80' OF N 150 011Tt 1010184009 $ 216.760.00YOU CHAD A Weed Removal 9/5/2019 $ 203.00 71416 $ 203.00 228 BROWN ST IOWA CITY ORIGINAL TOWN COM SE COR OUTLOT 19; S; W LO N ED W 40; 5 35'; E 27; 5 38'; E 8'; 5 92' & E 85' BEG EXC 10,02020111$ 422,260.00 IYU, MEI-HSIA Weed Remo al 10/15/20191 $ 203.00 171813 1 $ 203.00 M.