Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-02-18 ResolutionItem Number: 6.b. r � � At + at1Mw��al +•ate_ CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org February 18, 2020 Resolution to issue Cigarette Permit to Twin City Iowa, LLC, dba Iowa City BP, 2875 Commerce Dr. ATTACHMENTS: Description Cigarette Resolution Prepared by: City Clerk's Office, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5043 Resolution Number: 2e-33 Resolution to Issue Cigarette Permits Whereas, the following firms and persons have made an application and paid the taxes required by law for the sale of cigarettes, tobacco, nicotine and vapor products. Now, Therefore, be it Resolved by The City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, That: the applications be granted and the City Clerk is hereby directed to issue a permit to the following named persons and firms to sell cigarettes, tobacco, nicotine and vapor products: Iowa City BP, 2875 Commerce Dr. Passed and approved this 18th day of February 2020 or pproved by City Attorney's Office It was moved by Taylor and seconded by salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X x x Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 7.a. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest a Declaration of Condominium Regime for the 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums. Prepared By: Susan Dulek, Ass't. City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Tracy Hightshoe, NDS Director Fiscal Impact: none Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Declaration of Condominium Regime Executive Summary: As part of the South District Program, the City purchased a duplex located at 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive for the purpose of converting it to 2 condominium units and selling each unit to income eligible persons. The resolution approves the attached Declaration of Condominium Regime, the legal document that allows for the sale of a condo unit. Background /Analysis: The Declaration governs the legal relationship between the 2 owners and identifies what parts of the property each unit owner will own (the interior residential space and a garage) and what parts the owners will own in common (e.g., the yard and driveway). It also sets forth the maintenance duties of each owner. The Declaration provides that the units must be owner -occupied for 21 years and can be renewed by the City for successive 21 year periods in accordance with the Iowa Code. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Condo Declaration Prepared by: Susan Dulek, Asst. City Atty., 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030 RESOLUTION NO. 20-34 Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest a Declaration of Condominium Regime for the1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums. Whereas, the City has purchased a duplex at 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive and converted it to a two -unit residential condominium structure; and Whereas, the City intends to sell each unit to an income -eligible family as part of its South District Program; and Whereas, a Declaration of Condominium Regime must be executed and recorded prior to completion of a sale; and Whereas, City staff has prepared and approved the attached Declaration of Condominium Regime and recommends it be approved and executed. Now, therefore, be it hereby resolved by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, that 1. Upon the direction of the City Attorney, the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute and attest respectively the attached Declaration of Submission of Property to Horizontal Regime Establishing a Plan for Condominium Ownership of Premises — 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums. 2. The City Clerk is directed to record said declaration at cost to the City. 3. Upon the direction of the City Attorney and the recommendation of the City Manager, the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute and attest respectively amendments to said declaration. Passed and approved this 18th • pr � City Attorney's Office day of February _'2020. or Attest: Resolution No. Page 2 It was moved by Taylor and seconded by Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: x Y x x x x x ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Prepared by & Return To: Susan Dulek Asst City Aftomev 410E Washington St Iowa City, IA 5224013191356-5030 DECLARATION OF SUBMISSION OF PROPERTY TO HORIZONTAL REGIME ESTABLISHING A PLAN FOR CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP OF PREMISES 1232-1234 SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS This Declaration of Submission of Property to the Horizontal Regime is made and executed in Iowa City, Iowa, the 1 Rrh day of February, 2020, by the City of Iowa City, an Iowa Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "DECLARANTS', pursuant to the provisions of the Horizontal Property Act, Chapter 49913, Code of Iowa (2019), as amended. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, DECLARANTS are the owners of certain real property located in Iowa City, Iowa, and more particularly described as follows: Lot 278 in Part Five, Hollywood Manor Addition to Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 35, Page 18, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. WHEREAS, DECLARANTS are the owners of the above-described real estate and buildings and other improvements built upon said real estate and it is the desire and the intention of the DECLARANTS to divide the Project into Condominiums and to sell and convey the same to various purchasers, pursuant to the provisions of the aforesaid Horizontal Property Act, and to impose upon said property mutually beneficial restrictions, covenants, and conditions; and WHEREAS, DECLARANTS desire and intend by filing this Declaration to submit the above-described property and buildings and other improvements constructed thereon, together with all appurtenances thereto, to the provisions of the aforesaid Act as a Condominium Project. NOW, THEREFORE the DECLARANTS do hereby publish and declare that all property described above is held and shall be held and conveyed subject to the following covenants, conditions, uses, limitations and obligations, all of which are declared and agreed to be in furtherance of a plan for the improvement of said property and the division thereof into condominiums and shall be deemed to run with the land and shall be a burden and a benefit to DECLARANTS, their successors and assigns and any person acquiring or owning an interest in the real property and improvements, their grantees, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, devisees and assigns. ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS 1. DECLARANTS. The term "DECLARANTS" shall mean the City of Iowa City, an Iowa Municipal Corporation, having made and executed this Declaration. 2. DECLARATION. The term "DECLARATION' shall mean this instrument by which 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums is established as provided under the Horizontal Property Act. 3. PROJECT. The term "PROJECT' shall mean the entire parcel of real estate property referred to in this Declaration to be divided into Condominiums, including all structures thereon. 4. UNIT. The term "UNIT' shall mean one or more rooms occupying all or part of a floor intended for use as a residence and for use as a garage and not owned in common with the other owner in the Regime. The boundary lines of each Unit are the interior surfaces of its perimeter walls, bearing walls, floors, ceilings, windows and window frames, doors and door frames, and trim, and includes the portions of the Building so described and the air space so encompassed. The Regime consists of one Building containing two Units. 5. COMMON ELEMENTS. The term "LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS" shall have the meaning as defined in ARTICLE IV. There are no "GENERAL COMMON ELEMENTS" contemplated for this Project. 6. BUILDING. The term "BUILDING Shall mean the structural improvement constructed on the real estate described herein as more particularly described on Exhibits A and B. The one Building constitutes the sole building included in the Regime. 7. GARAGE. The term "GARAGE" means a structure abutting a driveway, contiguous with the building and intended for, but not limited to, storage of an automobile. One garage is included within each Unit. 8. CONDOMINIUM. The term "CONDOMINIUM" means the entire estate in the real property owned by any Owner, consisting of an undivided interest in the Common Elements and ownership of a separate interest in a Unit. 9. OWNER. The term "OWNER" means any person with an ownership interest in a Unit in the Project. 10. ASSOCIATION. The term "ASSOCIATION' means 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums Owners Association and its successors, a council of co-owners. 11. COUNCIL OF CO-OWNERS. The term "COUNCIL OF CO-OWNERS" means all co- owners of the building and is otherwise known and synonymous with the term "ASSOCIATION' and/or "HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION." 12. CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS. The term "CONDOMINIUM DOCUMENTS" means this Declaration, and all Exhibits attached hereto including the Bylaws of the Association. 13. PLURAL AND GENDER. Whenever the context so permits or requires, the singular shall include the plural and the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall include all genders. 14. SEVERABILITY. The invalidity of any covenant, restriction, agreement, undertaking, or other provision of any Condominium Document shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 15. INCORPORATION. Exhibits attached hereto and referred to herein are hereby made a part hereof with the same force and effect as other provisions of this Document. ARTICLE II. DESCRIPTION OF LAND, BUILDING AND UNITS 1. Description of Land. The land submitted to the Regime is located in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, and is legally described as follows: Lot 278 in Part Five, Hollywood Manor Addition to Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 35, Page 18, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. 2. Description of Building. The Condominium Regime consists of one building which contains two (2) dwelling Units and two attached garages. It is a one-story building with a full basement. The principal materials of construction are: Vinyl siding, CIP concrete foundation, asphalt shingles, and wood frame. The building is constructed to the general specifications as set out in detail in Exhibit "A" to this Declaration. The building site plan, showing a footprint of the building and the individual units, is attached as Exhibit "B". 3. Description of the Units. The Condominium Regime consists of two (2) units locally known as1232-1234 Sandusky Drive, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa according to the specifications set out at Exhibit "A". A one -stall garage is included within each Unit. The plans of the building are attached as Exhibit "A," and the Engineer's Certificate for the plans is attached as "Exhibit C." Each Unit is an owner of fifty percent (50%) of the Limited Common Elements as defined in Article IV, and each Unit shall pay one-half of the common expenses, if any, and each Unit shall be entitled to one (1) vote in the Association. ARTICLE III. OWNERSHIP INTERESTS 1. Exclusive Ownership and Possession by Owner. Each Owner shall be entitled to exclusive ownership and possession of his or her Unit. Each Owner shall be entitled to an undivided fifty percent (50%) interest in the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article IV. Said percentage of the undivided interest of each Owner in the Limited Common Elements shall have a permanent character and shall not be altered without the consent of all Owners expressed in an amended Declaration duly recorded. The percentage of the undivided interest in the Limited Common Elements shall not be separated from the Unit to which it appertains and shall be deemed to be conveyed or encumbered or released from liens with the Unit even though such interest is not expressly mentioned or described in the conveyance or other instrument. Each Owner may use the Limited Common Elements in accordance with the purpose for which they are intended, without hindering or encroaching upon the lawful rights of the other Owner. An Owner shall not be deemed to own the undecorated and/or unfinished surfaces of the perimeter walls, ceiling, window and doors bounding his or her Unit, nor shall the Owner be deemed to own the utilities running through his or her Unit which are utilized for, or serve, more than one Unit, except as a percentage of an undivided interest in the Limited Common Elements. An Owner, however, shall have the exclusive right to paint, repaint, tile, wax, paper or otherwise refinish and decorate the interior surfaces of the walls, floors, ceilings, windows and doors bounding his or her Unit. 2. Appurtenances. There shall pass with the ownership of each Unit as a part thereof, whether or not separately described in Article IV(1), all appurtenances to such Unit and no part of the appurtenant interest of any Unit may be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of except in connection with the sale, transfer or other disposition of such Unit itself or of all Units in the Regime. 3. Undivided Fractional Interest. An undivided interest in the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article IV, of the Regime shall be appurtenant to each Unit. The amount of such undivided interest appurtenant to each Unit is fifty percent (50%). 4. General Common Elements. This Project has no General Common Elements. 5. Limited Common Elements. The exclusive use by Owners of the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article IV, shall be deemed an appurtenance of the unit for which said elements are reserved, provided such use and enjoyment shall be limited to the uses permitted by this Declaration and other Condominium Documents. 6. Association Membership and Voting Rights. Appurtenant to each Unit shall be membership in the 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums Owners Association and one (1) vote in the affairs of the Association and of the Regime; provided, however, that the exercise of such voting and membership rights shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the Bylaws of the Association and of the other Condominium Documents. The action of such Association shall be deemed the action of the Owners; and such action, when taken in accordance with the Bylaws of the Association and this Declaration shall be final and conclusive upon all Unit Owners. 7. Cross -Easements. Appurtenant to each Unit shall be easements from each Unit Owner to each other Unit Owner and to the Association, and from the Association to the respective Unit Owners as follows: (a) For ingress and egress through the common areas and for maintenance, repair, and replacement as authorized; (b) Through the Units and common facilities for maintenance, repair and replacement or reconstruction of Limited Common Elements, but access to Units shall be only during reasonable hours and upon reasonable notice except in case of emergency; (c) Every portion of a Unit contributing to the support of a Building is burdened with an easement of such support for the benefit of all such other Units; (d) Through the Units and common areas for conduits, ducts, plumbing, wiring and other facilities for the furnishing of utility or other services to the other Units in the common areas, but access to Units shall be only during reasonable hours and upon reasonable notice except in case of emergency; 4 (e) For ingress and egress through the exterior front and rear walkways as necessary to access a Unit. ARTICLE IV. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS 1. Definition. The term "Limited Common Elements" shall include all portions of the Project (land and improvements thereon) not included within any Unit. The term "Limited Common Elements" as it relates to each individual Unit shall mean and such elements shall consist of the real estate immediately adjacent to each Unit divided by the same plain which separates the Units not including the garages which, said plain being extended to meet the front and rear boundary lines of the lot on which such Unit is located. The Limited Common Elements directly adjacent to each Unit shall be reserved for the sole and exclusive use by the Owners of the Unit to which said Limited Common Elements are appurtenant. The Limited Common Elements include but are not limited to: a. The land on which the Building is erected. b. Front, side, and rear yards; trees and plantings. c. Front and rear walkways. d. Driveway. e. Solar panels. f. Wood fence and chain link fence in the rear yard. g. The foundations, floors, exterior walls of each Unit and of the Building, ceilings and roofs, and entrances and exits or communication ways, and in general all devices or installations existing for common use, except as limited in the next Article. h. Installations for public utilities, including electric, cable TV, gas and cold water for common use. i. All exterior walls of the Building, all walls and partitions separating the two Units, interior load bearing walls and all other elements which are structural to a Unit are reserved for that Unit. j. Air conditioner pads, compressors and equipment. 2. Exception. Notwithstanding the reservations made by this Article, the integrity and appearance of the Regime as a whole are the common interests of all Owners and, as such, shall be subject to the terms and restrictions of this Declaration. 3. Right of Association. The reservation of the Limited Common Elements herein shall not limit any right the Association and its agents may otherwise have to alter such Limited Common Elements or enter upon such Limited Common Elements. ARTICLE V. DECLARANTS' RESERVED RIGHTS AND POWERS 1. Declarants' Activities. Declarants are irrevocably and perpetually empowered, notwithstanding any use, restriction or other provision hereof to the contrary, to sell, lease or rent Units to any person and shall have the right to transact on the Condominium property any business relating to construction, repair, remodeling, sale, lease or rental of Units, including but not limited to, the right to maintain signs, employees, independent contractors and equipment and materials on the premises, and to use Limited Common Elements to show Units. All signs and all items and equipment pertaining to sales or rentals or construction and any Unit furnished by the Declarants for sale purposes shall not be considered Limited Common Elements and shall remain its separate property. Declarants retain the right to be and remain the Owner of any completed but unsold Unit under the same terms and conditions as other Owners, including membership in the Association save for its right to sell, rent or lease. 2. Easements. Declarants expressly reserve perpetual easements for ingress, egress and utility purposes as may be required across and under the land submitted hereby. 3. Designation of Association Directors. Declarants shall be the sole member of the Council of Co -Owners of the 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominium Owners Association until the first Unit of said Association is sold. Thereafter the Council of Co -Owners shall be selected in the manner specified in the Bylaws of the Association. 4. Terminate. Amend and Modifv. After Declarants sell both Units, Declarants' reserved rights and powers terminate automatically except as set forth herein. After Declarants sell both Units, Declarants reserve the right without the consent of Unit Owners to amend or modify the Declaration for the following purpose: (a) To add engineer's certificates indicating that Buildings have been completed and constructed according to the plans and specifications which are a part of this Declaration. (b) To revise the legal description, site plan, building plans or specifications, or any other portion of this Declaration in order to correct scrivener's or other non -material errors that do not affect any Owner's interest in his or her Unit or any appurtenance thereto. ARTICLE VI. MANAGEMENT OF THE REGIME 1. Association: Council of Co-owners. The operation of the Condominium shall be by a membership association. The name of the Association shall be "1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums Owners Association." A copy of its Bylaws is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "D," and incorporated herein. Whenever a vote or other action of Unit owners as a group is required the mechanics of conducting such a vote or taking such action shall be under the control and supervision of the Association. The affairs of the Association shall be conducted by a Council of two (2) co-owners who shall be designated in the manner provide in the Bylaws. The action of the Association shall constitute the action of the Owners or the Council of Co-owners whenever such action is permitted or required herein or by Chapter 499B of the Code of Iowa (2019), as amended. 2. Compliance. All owners, tenants, families, guests and other persons using or occupying the Regime shall be bound by and strictly comply with the provisions of the Bylaws of the Association and applicable provisions of other Condominium Documents, and all agreements, regulations and determinations lawfully made by the Association and its directors, officers or agents shall be binding on all such Owners and other persons. A failure to comply with the Bylaws or the provisions of the other Condominium Documents or any agreement or determination thus lawfully made shall be grounds for an action to recover sums due for damages on the part of the Association or any Owner, as applicable, or injunctive relief without waiving either remedy. 3. Powers of Association. Each Owner agrees that the Association has and shall exercise all powers, rights and authority granted unto it, the Council of Co-owners, and the Owners as a group by Chapter 499B of the Code of Iowa (2019), as amended, and such as are more particularly set forth in the Condominium Documents, including but not limited to the making of assessments chargeable to Owners and the creation of a lien on Units thereof, and to acquire 6 a Unit at foreclosure sale and to hold, lease, mortgage or convey the same. Each Owner hereby waives any rights to delay or prevent such foreclosure by the Association which he or she may have by reason of a homestead exemption. 4. Partition. All Unit Owners shall be deemed to have waived all rights of partition, if any, in connectional such acquisition. 5. Membership, Voting Rights. The members of the Association shall consist of all of the record Owners of Units. After receiving the approval of the Association elsewhere required, change of membership in the Association shall be established by recording in the public records of Johnson County, Iowa, a deed or other instrument establishing a record title to a Unit, in the Condominium and the membership of the prior Owner shall be thereby terminated. The members of the Association shall be entitled to cast one (1) vote for each Unit owned by such member. 6. Restraint upon Assignment. The share of a member in the funds and assets of the Association cannot be assigned, hypothecated or transferred in any manner except as an appurtenance to his or her Unit. 7. Discharge of Liabilitv. All Owners shall promptly discharge any lien which may hereafter be filed against his or her Condominium. 8. Limitation on Association's Liabilitv. The Association shall not be liable for any injury or damage to property caused by or on the Limited Common Elements or by another Owner or person in the Project or by any other means unless caused by the gross negligence of the Association. No diminution or abatement of common expense assessments shall be claimed or allowed for inconvenience or discomfort arising from the making of repairs or improvements of the Limited Common Elements or from any action taken to comply with any law, ordinance or orders of a governmental authority. 9. Arbitration of Differences. In the event any dispute arising that concerns any matter to be determined by the members of the Association results in a 1 to 1 vote, the members agree to first engage in good faith negotiations to resolve any such dispute. In the event that they are unable to resolve any such dispute by negotiating, the owner of each Unit shall choose one arbitrator and such arbitrators shall choose one additional arbitrator, and the decision of the majority of all the arbitrators shall be final and conclusive of the questions presented. If either owner refuses or fails to promptly appoint an arbitrator, the same may be appointed by a judge of the District Court of Iowa in and for Johnson County. Arbitration shall be in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and the cost thereof shall be shared equally by the owners. ARTICLE VII. MAINTENANCE, ALTERATION AND IMPROVEMENT 1. Definitions. Certain terms used in this Article shall have a meaning as follows, provided any dispute over meanings shall be conclusively decided by the Board of Directors of the Association: (a) "Maintenance" or "repair" shall mean the act of maintaining, restoring, renovating, reconstructing, replacing, rebuilding and similar work necessary to preserve a Unit or the property in its original condition as completed. (b) "Improvement" shall mean the addition of a new structure, element orfacility, other than a structure, element or facility otherwise provided for by this Declaration. 2. Maintenance by Association. The Association shall have no obligation to maintain a Unit or the Limited Common Elements within the Project. Maintenance by Owner. (a) Each Unit Owner at his or her own expense shall maintain that portion of the building located within the Unit, including the boundary surfaces of such Unit and its equipment, shall keep such interior in a clean and sanitary condition, shall do all redecorating, painting and other finishing which may at any time be necessary to maintain his or her Unit, and shall be responsible for the maintenance of all personalty including carpets, furnishings, and appliances within such Unit. (b) The Owner of each Unit shall be responsible for maintaining the plumbing fixtures within the Unit and heating and the air conditioning unit serving such Unit and all other utilities or portions thereof located within the boundaries of his or her Unit. The Owner shall also, at his or her own expense, keep his or her Unit in a clean and sanitary condition. (c) The Unit Owner shall maintain, at his or her expense, any improvement or other alteration to the Unit made by him or her. (d) Notwithstanding the Limited Common Elements reserved to each Unit owner in Article IV(1), the Owner of Unit A shall be responsible for: (i) Removing snow from the public sidewalk along Sandusky Drive to the curb on Davis Street as required by the Iowa City City Code. (ii)Repairing the public sidewalk along Sandusky Drive to the curb on Davis Street as required by the Iowa City City Code. (iii) Maintaining the right of way between the curb and property line along Sandusky Drive as required by the Iowa City City Code. (iv) Removing snow from the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit A garage to Sandusky Drive. (v)Maintaining the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit A garage to Sandusky Drive. (vi) Maintaining the front and rear walkways adjacent to Unit A, including removing snow and ice. (e) Notwithstanding the Limited Common Elements reserved to each Unit owner in Article IV(1), the owner of Unit B shall be responsible for: (i) Removing snow from the public sidewalk along Davis Street to the curb on Sandusky Drive as required by the Iowa City City Code. (ii) Repairing the public sidewalk along Davis Street to the curb on Sandusky Drive as required by the Iowa City City Code. (iii) Maintaining the right of way between the curb and property line along Davis Street as required by the Iowa City City Code. (iv) Removing snow from the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit B garage to Sandusky Drive. (v) Maintaining the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit B garage to Sandusky Drive. (vi) Maintaining the front and rear walkways adjacent to Unit B, including removing snow and ice. (f) Notwithstanding the Limited Common Elements reserved to each Unit owner in Article IV(1), the owner of Unit A and the owner of Unit B shall both be responsible for repairing and maintaining the chain link fence in the rear yard. 4. Alterations or Improvements by Owner. No Unit Owner shall make or permit to be made any structural alteration to the Building without first obtaining written consent of the owner of the other Unit if such alteration affects the firewall separating the two Units in the project. Unit owner shall do no act or work which will impair the structural soundness or integrity of the Building or safety of the property or impair any easement. The improvement or alteration of a Unit shall not cause an increase or decrease in the number of ownership interests appurtenant to such Unit. 5. Destruction. In the event of a destruction of all or any portion of any Unit by fire or other casualty, the Owner of such Unit shall immediately take whatever precautions may be reasonably required to preserve and protect an adjoining Unit from further damage. In addition, in the event of any such destruction, any damaged Unit shall be reconstructed, unless otherwise agreed by both Unit Owners. The following provisions shall govern exterior replacements, maintenance and repairs and in reconstruction. The Owner of a Unit may repair or replace exterior components of such Unit with components similar to preexisting components and of the same design and color, and may paint the exterior of such Unit with paint of the existing color or colors, but such Owner may not either in the course of ordinary replacement, maintenance, repair and remodeling or in the restoration after damage or destruction, use different siding, roofing or other exterior components, or a different color scheme, unless the Owner of the adjoining Unit provides prior written consent to do so. In the event of any dispute arising between the Unit owners concerning a change of siding, roofing materials, color scheme or any other exterior components, the adjoining Unit Owners agree to first engage in good faith negotiations to resolve any dispute. In the event any dispute arising that concerns any matter herein results in a 1 to 1 vote, the members agree to first engage in good faith negotiations to resolve any such dispute. In the event that they are unable to resolve any such dispute by negotiating, the arbitration provision of Article VI.9 shall apply. The arbitrator's decision shall be based upon whether the proposed siding, roofing materials, color scheme or other changes are in harmony with the existing design of the adjoining Unit. ARTICLE VIII. CONDITIONS OF AND RESTRICTIONS ON OWNERSHIP, USE, AND ENJOYMENT 1. Subsection of the Property to Certain Provision. The ownership, use, occupation, and enjoyment of each Unit and of the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article VI, shall be subject to the provisions of the Bylaws and this Declaration, all of which provisions irrespective of where set forth or classified shall have equal status and shall be enforceable and binding as a covenant, condition, restriction, or requirement running with the land and shall be binding on and enforceable against each and all Units and the Owners thereof and their respective assigns, lessees, tenants, occupants and successors in interest. 2. Use of Property. The use of the property shall be in accordance with and subject to the following provisions: (a) A Unit shall be used or occupied for any use allowed in the Iowa City Zoning Code. (b) No activity shall be allowed which unduly interferes with the peaceful possession and use of the property by the Unit Owners nor shall any fire hazard or unsightly accumulation of refuse be allowed. (c) Nothing shall be done or kept in any Unit or in the common area which will increase the rate of insurance on the common area, without the prior written consent of the other Unit Owner. No Owner shall permit anything to be done or kept in his or her Unit or in the common area which will result in the cancellation of insurance on any Unit or any part of the common area, or which would be in violation of any law. (d) No Unit Owner shall install a fence in the front yard as part of the Limited Common Elements appurtenant to the Owner's Unit without the written consent of the other Unit owner. (e) No Unit Owner shall be allowed to install additional parking slabs on any part of the Property, nor shall parking of any vehicles be allowed except on the driveway and in the garages. No Unit Owner, guest or invitee shall block vehicular access to each unit's garage by parking vehicles or placing objects within that portion of the common driveway which abuts the Unit's garage door and which provides direct access to the public right of way. Each Unit Owner's guests or invitees will park their own vehicles only on the portion of the driveway in front of the Unit's garage door, doing the same is such a manner as to not violate the provisions of this subparagraph. (f) The Association shall have the authority to adopt rules and regulations governing the use of the property and such rules shall be observed and obeyed by the Owners, their guests and invitees. (g) Agents of or contractors hired by the Association may enter any Unit when necessary in connection with any maintenance, landscaping, or construction for which the Association is responsible, provided such entry shall be made with as little inconvenience to the Owners as practicable. (h) A Unit Owner shall give notice to the other Owner and the Association of every lien against his or her Unit other than permitted mortgages, taxes, and Association assessments, and of any suit or other proceeding which may affect the title to his or her Unit, within ten (10) days after the lien attaches or the Owner receives notice of such Unit. (i) A Unit Owner shall be liable to the Association for the expense of any maintenance, repair, or replacement rendered necessary by his or her act, neglect, or carelessness, or by that of his or her family, guests, employees, agents, or lessees, which liability shall include any increase in insurance rates resulting therefrom. 3. No Waiver. Failure of the Association or any Owner to enforce any covenant, condition, restriction or other provision of Chapter 499B of the Code of Iowa (2019), as amended, this Declaration, the Bylaws of the Association, or the rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto, shall not constitute a waiver of the right to enforce the same thereafter. 4. Owner Occupied Covenants. (a) No Unit may be rented. The Unit owners must occupy, reside, and live in the Unit. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, a Unit owner may lease to one person for a minimum period of 90 days provided the Unit owner occupies, resides and lives in 10 the Unit throughout the rental period. (b) The covenants provided for in Article VIII(4)(a) (the "Covenants") shall be covenants running with the land and shall remain in effect for an initial twenty-one year period and successive twenty-one year periods in accordance with Iowa Code Section 614.24 (2019), or as provided by an amendment thereto regarding the statute of limitations regarding the enforcement of use restrictions (the "Survival Period"). The Covenants shall, in any event, and without regard to technical classification or designation, legal or otherwise, and except only as otherwise specifically provided in this Declaration, be binding for said period(s), to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity, for the benefit and in favor of, and enforceable by, the City of Iowa City, its successors and assigns, against the Unit Owners, their successors and assigns, and any party in possession or occupancy of the Units. (c) In amplification, and not in restriction, of the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it is intended that the City of Iowa City and its successors shall be deemed beneficiaries of the Covenants, both for and in its own right and also for the purposes of protecting the interests of the community and other parties, public or private, in whose favor or for whose benefit such Covenants have been provided. Such Covenants shall run in favor of the City of Iowa City for the Survival Period, during which time such Covenants shall be in force and effect without regard to whether the City of Iowa City has at any time been, remains, or is an owner of any land or interest therein to or in favor of which such Covenants relate. The City of Iowa City shall have the right in the event of any breach of any Covenant during the Survival Period to exercise all the rights and remedies, and to maintain any actions or suits at law or in equity or other proper proceedings to enforce the curing of such breach of Covenant, to which it or any other beneficiaries of such Covenant may be entitled, and shall be entitled to recover, in addition to its court costs, a reasonable attorney's fee to be fixed by the court, and such recovery shall include court costs and attorney's fees on appeal, if any. Further, the City of Iowa City shall hold all right and authority to agree to or provide any amendment, modification, waiver, termination or release of the Covenants on behalf of itself and other parties, public or private, which are beneficiaries thereof. ARTICLE IX. INSURANCE AND CASUALTY 1. Insurance Obligation of Unit Owner. Each Unit owner shall obtain and keep in force a policy or policies of insurance covering comprehensive general liability, property damage, fire and other hazard insurance as it relates to each Unit Owner's Unit and Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article VI, directly adjacent to and appurtenant to each Unit. The fires and other hazard insurance policy or policies shall provide coverage for the replacement cost of each Unit and its applicable Limited Common Elements. Such fire and other hazard insurance shall bear a mortgage clause naming the mortgagee's interest in said property. The policy or policies shall insure against loss from perils therein covered to all the improvements in the Project and shall include coverage for fixtures and mechanical equipment located within each Unit and within the adjacent Limited Common Elements, such as plumbing fixtures, electrical lighting fixtures, solar panels, kitchen and bathroom cabinets and countertops, air conditioning, heating, built-in kitchen appliances which are fixtures, and water heater together with additions thereto and replacements thereof. Such policy or policies shall contain extended coverage, vandalism and malicious mischief endorsement. The policy or policies shall also cover personal property owned. Each Unit Owner policy shall include the adjoining Unit Owner as his or her interest appears. 11 2. Restoration in the Event of a Casualty. Restoration of the building located within each of the Units shall be accomplished in accordance with the terms of this Declaration. ARTICLE X. TERMINATION 1. Procedure. The Condominium may be terminated in the following manner, in addition to the manner provided by the Horizontal Property Act: (a) Destruction. In the event it is determined in the manner elsewhere provided that the Building shall not be reconstructed because of major damage, the Condominium plan of ownership will be thereby terminated in compliance to the provisions of Section 4996.8 of the Code of Iowa (2019), as amended. (b) Agreement. The Condominium may be terminated by agreement at any time by the approval in writing of all of the Owners of the Condominium and by holders of all liens affecting any of the Units by filing an instrument to that effect, duly recorded, as provided in Section 499B.8 of the Code of Iowa (2019), as amended. It shall be the duty of each Unit Owner and his or her respective lien holder to execute and deliver such instrument and to perform all acts as in manner and form as may be necessary to effect the sale of the Project when at a meeting duly convened of the Association, the Owners of 100% of the voting power, and all record owners of mortgages upon Units in the Regime, elect to terminate and/or sell the Project. (c) Certificate. The termination of the Condominium in either of the foregoing manners shall be evidenced by a certificate of the Association executed by all members of the Association and their respective holders of all liens affecting their interest in the Condominium, certifying as to facts effecting the termination, which certificate shall become effective upon being recorded in the office of the Johnson County Recorder in Iowa City, Iowa. 2. Form of Ownership after Termination. After termination of the Condominium, the Project will be held as follows: (a) The property (land and improvements) shall be deemed to be owned in common by the Owners. (b) The undivided interest in the property owned in common which shall appertain to each Unit Owner shall be the percentage of undivided interest previously owned by such Owner in the common area and facilities. (c) Any liens affecting any of the Condominiums shall be deemed to be transferred in accordance with the existing priorities to the undivided interest of the Owner in that property. (d) After termination, the net proceeds of sale, together with the net proceeds of the insurance on the property, if any, shall be considered as one fund and shall be divided among all the Owners in a percentage equal to the percentage of undivided interest owned by each Owner in the Common Elements; after first paying out of the respective shares of the Owners, to the extent sufficient for that purpose, all liens on the undivided interest in the property owned by each Owner. 12 ARTICLE XI. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION (a) Right to Mortgage. Each Unit Owner shall have the right, subject to these provisions, to grant separate mortgages for his or her Unit together with the respective ownership interest in the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article IV. No Unit Owner shall have the right or authority to make or create or cause to be made or created from the date hereof any mortgage or other lien on or affecting the Project or any part thereof, except only to the extent of his or her own Unit and the respective ownership interest in the Limited Common Elements appurtenant thereto. (b) Condemnation. If any Unit or portion thereof or the Limited Common Elements of any portion thereof is made the subject matter of any condemnation or eminent domain proceeding or is otherwise thought to be acquired by a condemning authority, the mortgagee of a Unit will be entitled to timely written notice of any such proceedings or proposed acquisition, and no provisions of the Declaration or any other documents establishing the Project shall entitle the Unit Owner or other party to priority over such mortgagee with respect to the distribution of the proceeds of any award or settlement. Any proceeds from settlement shall be payable to the Owners' Association, for the benefit of the Unit Owners and the mortgage holders. ARTICLE XII. AMENDMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS 1. Procedure. Except as otherwise provided in this Declaration, this Declaration may be amended and such amendment shall be made in the following manner; (a) Notice. Notice of the subject matter of a proposed amendment shall be included in the notice of any meeting at which a proposed amendment is considered. Holders of a first mortgage of record shall receive notice of such proposed amendment as provided in the Bylaws of the Association. (b) Resolution. A resolution adopting a proposed amendment may be proposed by any member of the Association. Except as provided elsewhere, the resolution must be adopted by a majority vote of all Owners entitled to vote, in person or by proxy; provided, however, no amendment effecting a substantial change in this Declaration or the Bylaws of the Association shall affect the rights of the holder of any such mortgage recorded prior to recordation of such amendment who does not join in the execution thereof and who does not approve said amendment in writing. (c) Bylaws. In the case of an amendment to this Declaration by reason of an amendment to the Bylaws of the Association, then in the manner specified in such Bylaws. (d) Execution and Recording. An amendment adopted pursuant to (b) or (c) above shall be executed by an officer specifically delegated to do so with the formalities required by Chapter 499B of the Code of Iowa (2019), as amended. Upon the recordation of such instrument in the office of the Johnson County Recorder, the same shall be effective against any persons owning an interest in a Unit or the Regime. 13 2. Amendment of Ownership Interest. No amendment shall change the percentage of ownership in the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article IV, appurtenant to a Unit, nor increase the Owner's share of the common expenses unless the record Owner of the Unit concerned and all record owners of mortgages thereon shall affirmatively join in the adoption of such amendment. 3. Indemnification. Each Unit Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless the other Unit Owner from: a) any liability arising out of the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article IV, directly adjacent to each Unit which are reserved for the sale and exclusive use by the Owner of the Unity to which said Limited Common Elements are appurtenant; and b) from any liability arising out of failure to maintain the right of way and Limited Common Elements as provided in Article VII(3)(d). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarants have executed this Declaration the day and year first above written. CITY OF IOWA CITY e Teague, M yor CITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) Approved: City Attorney's Office On this 11'—) day of Fe�r%a n r, , A , 2020, before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for the State of lo*a, personally appeared Bruce Teague and Kellie K. Fruehling, to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of said municipal corporation executing the within and foregoing instrument; that the seal affixed thereto is the seal of said municipal corporation; that said instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City Council; and that the said Mayor and City Clerk as such officers acknowledged that the execution of said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said corporation, by it and by them voluntarily executed. =11E o`er ty C9428lea t'13 D uryt.l /L . Nota ublic - Stat f Iowa 14 c c d r HVAC 23.00' HVAC ❑W1 'AN 0 UNIT "B" UNIT "A" 1234 SANDUSKY DR 1232 SANDUSKY DR 46.00' I LOWER LEVEL (UNFINISHED) CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319) 351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date I Revl5lon EXHIBIT "A" UNITS A&B SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA I MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Date. 01/16/2020 Designed ry: Field Book No: JDM Drawn by: Scale: CAK 1"=10' Ghecked by: Sheet No. KJB 1 Project No: IC 0339-268 of: 3 E FRONT ELEVAT ON REAR ELEVATION M M S CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsconsuItants.net Date Revision EXHIBIT "A" UNITS A&B SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Date: 01/16/2020 Designed by: Fleld Book No: JDM Drawn by: Scale: Checked by: sheet No: KJB 2 Project No: IC 0339-268 of: 3 RIGHT ELEVATION DEFT ELEVATION CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revision EXH I E I T "A" UNITS A&B SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Date: 01/16/2020 Designed by: Field Book No: JDM Drawn by: scale: CAK NTS Checked by: Sheet No: KJB 3 Project No: IC 0339-268 of: 3 EXHIBIT "B" - SITE PLAN 1232-1234 SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS IOWA CITY, IOWA NOTES: 1. ALL MEASUREMENTS FROM PROPERTY LINES TO BUILDINGS ARE PERPENDICULAR AND/OR RADIAL TO SAID PROPERTY LINES. 2. THIS DRAWING DEPICTS IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED AS OF 02/04/2020. 3. REFERENCE BUILDING PLANS, EXHIBIT "A" FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND UNIT NUMBERS. 4. THIS IS A CONDO SURVEY AND NOT A BOUNDARY OR PROPERTY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON AS SUCH. THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES ARE RECORD DIMENSIONS AND APPROXIMATE ONLY. _ LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS RESERVED FOR UNIT "A" / / _ LIMITED COMMON ELEM&TS RESERVED FOR UNIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 278 OF HOLLYWOOD MANOR ADDITION PART FIVE, IOWA CITY, IOWA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORDED PLAT IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 18, IN THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE. N88'08'37"E 135.19'(M) 135.57'(R) I 27777 I I 294 HOLLYWOOD MANOR ADDITION PART FIVE, IOWA OTY, IOWA PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 1; I I I I N88.08'12"E 135.57' p�ppp 38.i 9'; \ '\ \ 7 .07, j / i �� j 2 :9B'1232 luul raGj� O a, \` ; ; :, \ ANDDRUSK SANDUSK >. zz CSc�7 \ \ DR moi Mn / UNIT "A" UNIT "B" Od / raaKE J. Y — — — — \ / ! —9:31 BECKLER ' ' = 14624 //OjO*iiiivanum m mAm ENUE 6ANDUSKY AV ---------------- 1P f� 0 4 10 20 30 40 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1'=40' I hereby certify that this engineering document was prepared by me or under my direct supervision a d that 1 am a duly licensed Professional n (neer under the I of the StateofIowa. Z /U 2OZ-0 ECKLER, P.E. Iowa Lic. No. 14624 My license renewal date is December 31, 20L0 Pages or sheets covered by this seal: CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsconsultants.net Date Revlslon 02/04/20 ALL UNITS -CAK 02/10/20 REVISIONS PER ATIY-CAK 02/11/20 REVISIONS PER ATiY-LSS EXHIBIT "B"' - SITE PLAN 1232-1234 SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Date, 02/05/2020 Designed by: I Field Book No: Drawn by: Checked by:Sheet No: KJB 1 Protect No: IC 0339-268 of: 1 Prepared by: After recording return to: Kelly J. Beckler MMS Consultants, Inc. Sue Dulek City of Iowa City Attorney 1917 S. Gilbert Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 EXHIBIT "C" 319-351-8282 319-351-8476 facsimile 319-356-5030 319-356-5008 facsimile ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE 1232 —1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums Units: A (1232 Sandusky Drive) and B (1234 Sandusky Drive) STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) I, Kelly J. Beckler, being duly sworn on oath do depose and state the following: That I am a Professional Engineer authorized and licensed to practice my profession in the State of Iowa. 2. That I have examined the Building Plans for 1232 — 1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums, Units A (1232 Sandusky Drive) and B (1234 Sandusky Drive), referenced as Exhibit "A." This certificate is to become an exhibit to the Declaration of Submission of Property to Horizontal Property Regime for 1232 —1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums. I hereby certify that I have verified by non-destructive field observations that the above referenced Building Plans diagrammatically represent Units A (1232 Sandusky Drive) and B (1234 Sandusky Drive), of 1232 — 1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums, located therein, and the common elements that the Declarant has now constructed on the land shown on the attached Exhibit `B" — Site Plan, insofar as is reasonably possible due to expected carpentry tolerances, except for the following: a. None. Page 1 of 2 4. I hereby certify that the attached Exhibit `B" — Site Plan locates Units A (1232 Sandusky Drive) and B (1234 Sandusky Drive), of 1232 — 1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums. That as a licensed Professional Engineer, I hereby certify that said Site Plan is sufficient to determine with reasonable certainty the location of Units A (1232 Sandusky Drive) and B (1234 Sandusky Drive), of 1232 — 1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums, and hereby certify that said Building and U its, as construe , are located as indicated on said Site Plan. Ke eckler Iowa License Number 14624 My biennial license renewal date is December 31, 2020. and sworn to before me by said Kelly J. Beckler this r day of 7//t,,P� , 2020. IACEY ST11TZMAN in and for the State of Iowa..Commission Number 822560 * * MY COMMISSION EXPIRES q�1 DECEMBER % Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "D" BYLAWS OF 1232-1234 SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS OWNERS' ASSOCIATION These are the Bylaws of the 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums Owners Association (Association), an association organized for the purpose of administering 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums, a horizontal property regime (condominiums), established pursuant to Chapter 499B of the 2019 Code of Iowa, as amended, located on the following land in the City of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa: Lot 278 in Part Five, Hollywood Manor Addition to Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat thereof recorded in Book, 35, Page 18, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. I. MEMBERS AND VOTING RIGHTS 1. The owners of each condominium unit shall constitute the members of the Association and membership shall automatically cease upon termination of all interests which constitute a person an owner. Whenever only one spouse is a record titleholder, the other spouse shall be considered an owner for the purposes of membership, and shall be bound by the provisions of all condominium documents. Declarants shall be and have the rights of members with respect to unsold units. 2. An owner of record shall be recognized as a member without further action for so long as he or she holds an ownership interest. If ownership is acquired but not of record, or if acquired other than by way of conveyance, or other formal instrument of transfer (such as by death, judicial act or dissolution), the person acquiring or succeeding to ownership shall present the Council of Co -Owners of the Association evidence satisfactory to it of facts evidencing lawful ownership status prior to exercise of any rights of membership in the Association. Failure to provide such evidence shall not, however, relieve an owner of his or her ownership obrigations. A fiduciary or other official acting in the representative capacity shall exercise all membership rights and privileges of the owner which he or she represents. 3. If more than one person is the owner of the same unit, all such owners shall be members and remain jointly and severally liable for all membership obligations. In such cases, or if more than one fiduciary or other official is acting in the premises, the votes entitled to be cast by the owners of that unit shall be cast by the person named for that purpose on a certificate signed by all such owners or fiduciaries or other officials and filed with the Council of Co -Owners and such person shall be deemed to hold an ownership interest to such for purposes of voting and determining the representation of such ownership interest at any meeting or for purposes otherwise provided herein. If such certificate is not executed and filed with the Council of Co - Owners, such membership shall not be in good standing and the votes for that unit shall not be considered in considering a quorum or a vote or for any other purposes until this Bylaw is complied with. 4. The owner of each unit shall be entitled to one (1) vote on all matters to be determined by the members of the Association either as owners or as units or as contemplated by Chapter 4998 of the 2019 Code of Iowa, as amended, pursuant to the Declaration, including any supplements or amendments thereto, submitting the property to the regime. Votes of a single unit may not be divided. 5. In the event any dispute arising that concerns any matter to be determined by the members of the Association results in a 1 to 1 vote, the members agree to first engage in good faith negotiations to resolve any such dispute. In the event that they are unable to resolve any such dispute by negotiating, the owner of each Unit shall choose one arbitrator and such arbitrators shall choose one additional arbitrator, and the decision of the majority of all the arbitrators shall be final and conclusive of the questions presented. If either owner refuses or fails to promptly appoint an arbitrator, the same may be appointed by a judge of the District Court of Iowa in and for Johnson County. Arbitration shall be in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and the cost thereof shall be shared equally by the owners. II. COUNCIL OF CO-OWNERS 1. The affairs of the Association shall be managed by the Council of Co -Owners (Council). The Council shall consist of all members of the Association. An officer or designated agent of a partnership or corporate member shall qualify to serve on the Council. III. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COUNCIL OF CO-OWNERS All of the powers and duties of the Association shall be exercised by the Council, including those existing under the common law and statutes, and the documents establishing the Condominium Regime, per Article VI of the Declaration of Condominiums. Such powers and duties of the Council shall be exercised in accordance with the provisions of the Declaration which governs the use of the land, and in addition to those elsewhere provided, shall include but not be limited to the following: 1. The enforcement by legal means of the provisions of the Horizontal Property Regime, the Articles and Bylaws of the Association, Declaration, and the regulations for the use of the property in the Regime; and to take legal action in the name of the Association and on behalf of its members. 2. To carry insurance on the property committed to the Regime and insurance for the protection of unit owners, and occupants and the Association, if authorized by the members. 3. To conduct all votes or determinations of the members other than at a membership meeting. 4. To do such other acts as are necessary and proper to affect the purpose of the Regime as stated in the Declaration and these Bylaws provided such acts are not otherwise prohibited. IV. OFFICERS 1. The officers of the Association shall be the President, a Vice President, and a Treasurer -Secretary which offices may be filled by one person. All such officers shall be elected annually by the Council from the members of the Association. Each officer shall have the powers and duties usually vested in such office, and such authority as is committed to the office by the Bylaws or by specific grant from the Council, but subject at all times to the provisions of the Bylaws and to the control of the Council. 2. The President shall be the chief executive officer of the Association. He or she shall preside at all meetings of the Council 3. The Vice President shall preside over the Council meetings in the absence or disability of the President, and shall otherwise exercise the powers and duties of the President in the event of the absence or disability of the President and shall generally assist the President and exercise such other powers and duties as are prescribed by the Council. 4. The Secretary and Treasurer, which shall constitute one office, shall keep the minutes of all proceedings of Council meetings and shall have custody and control of the Minute Book of the Association and shall keep or be in charge and control of the records of the Association and additionally as Treasurer have control of the funds and other property of the Association and shall keep the financial books and records thereof. 5. Any instrument affecting an interest in real property maybe executed by the President or Vice President and one other officer upon authorization of the Council or in such manner as the Council may otherwise direct. V. AMENDMENT 1. These Bylaws may be amended, altered, repealed or new Bylaws adopted by the members at a regular or special meeting of the members upon the affirmative vote of 100% of all votes entitled to be cast; provided, however, no amendment effecting a substantial change in these Bylaws shall affect the rights of the holder of any mortgage recorded prior to recordation of such amendment who does not join in the execution thereof and who does not approve said amendment in writing. 2. To the extent provided by Section 499B.14 of the 2019 Code of Iowa, as amended, no modification nor amendment to these Bylaws shall be effective unless set forth in an amendment to the Declaration, executed and recorded in the manner set forth in the Declaration and an amendment to these Bylaws shall constitute an amendment to the Declaration as provided for by law. Upon such recording, said amendment shall be effective against all persons having an interest in a unit or the Regime regardless of whether said person had such interest at the time said amendment was adopted. VI. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 1. The invalidity of any portion of these Bylaws shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions or portions hereof. 2. The Association shall not have and employ a corporate seal. 3. The Association shall promulgate such Rules and Regulations as it deems to be in the best interests of all owners within the Regime. 4. Each member shall have the obligations as such member as are imposed on him or her by the Declaration as an owner, and no member shall have any power or authority to incur a mechanic's lien or other lien effective against the regime property except as the same may attach only against his or her interest therein. 5. No provision or restriction otherwise void by reason of application of the Rule Against Perpetuities shall continue for a period longer than the life of the last to survive of the owners or present officers of the Declarant, and their children in being, at the time of the initial recording of the Declaration and twenty-one years thereafter. 6. Each owner or lessee of his or her unit, as applicable, shall have a right to use and enjoy the Limited Common Elements, as defined in Article IV, appurtenant to such unit provided that such use shall be limited to the uses permitted by the Declaration and other governing documents of the Regime. VII. MEMBERS' MEETINGS 1. Meetings of the members of the Association maybe called for any purpose by a unit owner. 2. Written or printed notice stating the place, day and hour of the meeting and the purpose for which said meeting is called, shall be delivered not less than 7 or more than 60 days before the date of the meeting, either personally or by mail, by or at the direction of any officer or any unit owner. If mailed, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered when deposited in the United States mail, addressed to the member at his or her last known address. This notice requirement may be waived, in writing, by a unit owner representing each unit. 3. A quorum at a members' meeting shall consist of 2 representatives, either in person or by proxy, representing each unit. VIII. DEFINITIONS Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms used herein shall have the meanings stated in Chapter 499B of the Code of Iowa, as amended and as follows: 1. Person. The term "person" shall include an individual, a corporation, or other legal entity or its representative. 2. Owner. The term "owner" for purposes of these Bylaws shall mean any person who owns or holds an interest in one or more units subject to the Regime provided that the holder of a leasehold interest in a unit shall not be an owner and further provided that the holder of an equitable interest shall be an owner. 3. Singular, plural and gender. Whenever the context so permits or requires the use of the singular shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall include all genders. CITY OF IOWA CITY By ruce Teagy , Mayo EXHIBIT "E" RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR 1232-1234 SANDUSKY DRIVE CONDOMINIUMS 1. Parking. Parking of cars, trucks, motorcycles, trailers, boats, campers, recreational vehicles, and other vehicles is allowed only on the driveway and in the garages. No Unit Owner, guest or invitee shall block vehicular access to each Unit's garage by parking vehicles or placing objects within that portion of the common driveway between the Unit's garage door and Sandusky Drive. No Unit Owner shall install additional parking slabs on any part of the Property. 2. Satellite Dish and Antenna. Radio or television antenna, satellite dish, or any wiring for any purpose may not be installed on the exterior of the Building without the written consent of both Unit Owners. 3. Noise. No Unit Owner shall make or permit any disturbing noises in the Building which will interfere with the rights, comforts, or conveniences of t h e other Unit Owner. No Unit Owner shall playupon or suffer to be played upon any musical instrument or operate or permit to be operated a radio, television, electronic device, or other loud -speaker in such Owner's Unit between the hours of 10:00 PM and the following 6:00 AM_, if the same shall disturb or annoy other occupants of the Building. 4. Cleanliness. Each Unit Owner shall keep his or her Unit in a clean and sanitary condition. Unit Owners shall n o t sweep or throw from the doors or windows any dirt or other substance, or permit to be swept or thrown therefrom. Unit Owners shall not cause or permit any unusual or objectionable odors to be produced upon or emanate from their respective units. 5. Maintenance Responsibilities. As provided in Article IV of the Condominium Declaration: (a) The owner of Unit A (1232 Sandusky Drive) shall be responsible for: (i) Removing snow from the public sidewalk along Sandusky Drive to the curb on Davis Street as required by the Iowa City City Code. (ii) Repairing the public sidewalk along Sandusky Drive to the curb on Davis Street as required by the Iowa City City Code. (iii) Maintaining the right of way between the curb and property line along Sandusky Drive as required by the Iowa City City Code. (iv) Removing snow from the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit A garage to Sandusky Drive. (v) Maintaining the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit A garage to Sandusky Drive. (vi) Maintaining the exterior front and rear walkways adjacent to Unit A, including removing snow and ice. (b) The owner of Unit B (1234 Sandusky Drive) shall be responsible for: (i) Removing snow from the public sidewalk along Davis Street to the curb on Sandusky Drive as required by the Iowa City ordinances. (ii) Repairing the public sidewalk along Davis Street to the curb on Sandusky Drive as required by the Iowa City ordinances. (iii) Maintaining the right of way between the curb and property line along Davis Street as required by the Iowa City ordinances. (iv)Removing snow from the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit B garage to Sandusky Drive. (v)Maintaining the portion of the driveway extending from the Unit B garage to Sandusky Drive. (vi) Maintaining the exterior front and rear walkways adjacent to Unit B, including removing snow and ice. (c) The owner of Unit A and the owner of Unit B shall both be responsible for maintaining and repairing the chain link fence in the rear yard. (d) Each unit owner is responsible for maintaining and repairing the Limited Common Elements reserved for each unit, except as provided herein. 6. Renting. As provided in Article VIII of the Condominium Declaration, no Unit may be rented. The Unit owners must occupy, reside, and live in the Unit. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, a Unit owner may lease to one person for a minimum period of 90 days provided the Unit owner occupies, resides and lives in the Unit throughout the rental period. 7. Fencing. As provided in Article IX of the Condominium Declaration, no Unit Owner may install a fence in the front yard without the written consent of the other Unit Owner. S. Animals. All animals must be licensed with the Iowa City Animal Care and Adoption Center as required by the Iowa City City Code. 9. Mailboxes. Exterior name plates and mailboxes must be installed in a manner uniform and consistent with that of the other Unit and approved by the other unit Owner. 10.Amendment. These Rules and Regulations may be amended, modified or altered only as provided in the Bylaws of 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums Owners Association. These Rules and Regulations have been approved by the Council of Co -Owners consisting of all members of 1232-1234 Sandusky Drive Condominiums Owners Association on February )Sth 2020. CITY OF IOWA CITY 29 Bruce Teagu , Mayo Item Number: 7.b. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution approving Purchase Agreement by and between the City of Iowa City and KG STORE 526, L.L.C. for Auditor's Parcel 99093 at the northwest corner of S. Gilbert Street and McCollister Blvd. Prepared By: Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Fiscal Impact: $640,000 purchase price to be paid from the Equipment Fund, Account No. 81710510-471010 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Site Scheme Layouts Resolution Purchase Agreement Executive Summary: Purchase of this 2 acre parcel will enable the expansion of the current public works site. Kum 'n Go purchased the parcel in June of 2017 for $638,500. The city will purchase the site for $640,000. Background /Analysis: In 2016, Neumann Monson Architects completed a Master Plan for the Public Works Complex located at 3800 Napoleon Lane. The Master Plan developed two alternative layouts, which are attached. One layout, Scheme H, included the two acre parcel at the intersection of McCollister Boulevard and South Gilbert Street and one layout, Scheme G2, did not include the parcel. During the master planning process, Kum 'n Go purchased the two acre parcel. Kum 'n Go is disposing of the property and contacted Iowa City to determine its interest in the parcel. The purchase of the two acre parcel allows for the greatest flexibility with the site. The additional space will allow for better maneuvering on the site. The repair bays in the future maintenance building have the ability to allow vehicles to drive through. The building arrangement obscures the views to back of house functions. ATTACHMENTS: Description Site Scheme Layouts Resolution Purchase Agreement FINAL SITE MASTER PLAN Scheme H Advantages • 3 -building design allows the most flexibility regarding construction phasing • Appropriate maneuvering spaces are provided around the buildings, both now and during future expansions/ additions Parking is provided near building entrances Repair bays have the ability to allow vehicles to drive through (versus backing in/out) The building arrangement obscures views to back -of -house functions, which are typically utilitarian Disadvantages • Utilizes the southeast corner of the property, which is not currently owned by the City NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS MAINTENANCE DESIGN GROUP, LLC OV SALT MIX BINS � ` % ` BRINE E ^� FUTURE / DEVELOPMENT POLICE �i •/_ � FIRE OLID idfVASTE \ � WASH YARD STORAGE hhk I t" IPA \ BAI ENT AIR TENA CE 21 ` FUELott� \ (\ BULK ✓ /� /' WATER -- — -- McCOLLISTER BOULEVARD �T . a FINAL SITE MASTER PLAN Scheme G2 Advantages • Does not require the purchase of the adja( corner lot • Parking is near the offices and front doors • Less costly than option G1 Disadvantages • Tight turning radii - 80 feet outside of buildings, gets down to 60 feet between It N Transit and wash bays • Bus turning and wash bays are closer to each ` other '; •Architectural presence along Gilbert Street is aesthetically undesirable due to the configuration of the Repair Building and the relationship between future development of a the parcel at the southeast of the site • Future expansion along Gilbert Street results 1 in a foreign architectural element (Repair bay) relative to the rest of the facility j • More visibility to back -of -house functions. Back' of house functions are required to be locat *1 nearer to public frontages t 'm SALT wase vFIRE TOWER YARD STORAGE I T&Lfl� MY v - •a 1w .# \ ,,. i \ STAFF 0 t SHOPS 1 STORAGE VP' I FUTURE �. DEVELOPMENT SOLID WASTE •, � ` N G� TR ` UTURE s EQUIPMENT REPAIR 1 ', pR Bt�S MAI TENANCE FUEL PARCEL 1422152013 BULK -WATER . A-54 MCCOLLISTER BOULEVARD Section Four - Site Master Plan and Concept Building Design 10C 60 Prepared by: Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 3191356-5030 —(.6 RESOLUTION NO. 20-35 Resolution approving a purchase agreement by and between the City of Iowa City and KG store 526, L.L.C. for auditor's parcel 99093 at the northwest corner of S. Gilbert street and McCollister Blvd. Whereas, Auditor's Parcel 99093, a 2 -acre parcel of real estate at the northwest corner of S. Gilbert Street and McCollister Blvd. immediately south of the City's public works site, is currently owned by Kum 'n Go (KG STORE 526, L.L.C.); and Whereas, the City's acquisition of Auditor's Parcel 99093 will allow for the expansion of the public works site; and, Whereas, the purchase price of $640,000 is reasonable in light of Kum 'n Go's purchase of the parcel in June of 2017 for $638,500; and Whereas, the Purchase Agreement is contingent upon City Council Approval; and Whereas, it is in the best interests of the residents of Iowa City for the City to acquire said property. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that 1. The attached Purchase Agreement is approved by the City Council. 2. Upon direction of the City Attorney, the Mayor is authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest any and all documentation necessary to effectuate the purchase of the property pursuant to the purchase agreement approved herein. Passed and approved this 18 th day of ATTEST: CI CLERK e Yal X11 ,ZV Resolution No. Page 2 20-35 It was moved by Taylor and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS x x X x x X x ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between KG STORE 526, L.L.C., an Iowa limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as "Seller," and the City of Iowa City, a municipal corporation ofthe State of Iowa, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer;" WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Seller is the fee owner of real estate situated in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, as more particularly described below; WHEREAS, Buyer desires to purchase the real estate from Seller, all upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, it is agreed as follows: 1. Purchase and Sale of Property. Subject to the terms and provisions of this Agreement, Buyer, or its nominee, agrees to purchase, and Seller agrees to sell, the real estate locally known as 2995 South Gilbert Street, Iowa City, IA 52240 legally described as follows: Auditors Parcel 99093, according to the Plat of Survey recorded in Book 41, Page 67, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, being a portion of Auditor's Parcel "A", as recorded in Plat Book 33, Page 72, Records of Johnson County, Iowa, and located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, the boundaries of which are described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast comer of Auditor's Parcel "A", as recorded in Plat Book 33, Page 72, Records of Johnson County, Iowa; thence N25034148"W, along the Easterly line of said Auditor's Parcel, 280.61 feet to the Southeast corner of an acquisition plat; thence S64°25'12"W, along the Southerly line of said acquisition plat, 17.00 feet, to the point of beginning; thence continuing S64125'12"W, 60.00 feet; thence Southwesterly, 315.08 feet along an are of a 1174.26 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly, whose 314.13 foot chord bears S7210624"W; thence N10°12'23"W, 231.26 feet; thence N64°25'12"E, 310.00 feet to the Northwest comer of said acquisition plat; thence S25°34'48"E, along the Westerly line of said acquisition plat, 265.00 feet to said point of beginning; ("Premises") together with all buildings and improvements located thereon and any easements and servient estates appurtenant thereto. 2. Escrow Deposit. Within five (5) days after the full execution and delivery of this Agreement (the "Effective Date"), Buyer shall deposit with Seller or First American Title Insurance Company, Omaha, Nebraska ("Escrow Agent'l the sum of $10.00 516 koun rily IA surplus S I 1 1 i%Chv PA va idh I �9 �U tlin�YllCilvl 31 121526-Ic;;,,- °y-'oh9a,pFur,Sale{uax�+wC-uy ("Escrow Deposit') to be held, administered and disbursed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 3. Purchase Price, The total purchase price to be paid by Buyer to Seller for the Premises shall be $640,000.00 (the "Purchase Price"), payable in cash, or cash equivalents, on the Closing Date. The Escrow Deposit shall be credited against the purchase price at the Closing. 4. Closing Date. The "Closing," "Closing Date," or "Date of Closing" shall be on or before the date that is sixty (60) days after the Effective Date, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. The Closing shall occur at the Closing Place and shall be a "remote" closing with electronic transmission of documents, as permitted, and wire transfers of funds. Closing Place. The term "Closing Place" shall mean the offices of Escrow Agent. 6. Date of Possession. Possession of the Premises shall be delivered to Buyer on the Closing Date. 7. Use of Purchase Price. At time of settlement, funds of the purchase price may be used to pay taxes and other liens and to acquire outstanding interests of others, if any. 8. Abstract and Title. Seller, at its expense, shall promptly obtain an abstract of title to the Premises continued through the date of acceptance of this Agreement and deliver it to Buyer's attorney for examination. Seller shall deliver said abstract immediately upon the expiration of Buyer's Due Diligence Review period. The Abstract shall show marketable title in Seller in conformity with this Agreement, Iowa law, and the title standards of the Iowa State Bar Association. The Seller shall make every reasonable effort to promptly perfect title. The abstract shall become the property of Buyer when the purchase price is paid in full. The abstract shall be obtained from an abstracter qualified by the Guaranty Division of the Iowa Housing Finance Authority. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller shall be entitled to file a Use Restriction against the Premises in form that is identical to Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated as if fully set forth herein. 9. Premises Due Diligence. Within five (5) business days after the full execution hereof, Seller shall provide to Buyer such information and items regarding the Premises reasonably necessary to enable Buyer to complete its due diligence review of the transaction ("Due Diligence Review', such as information regarding environmental assessments, surveys, engineering studies, wetland studies, and such similar items as may be reasonably requested by Buyer. At any time within thirty (30) days following the full execution hereof (the "Due Diligence Review Period"), Buyer may terminate this Agreement if Buyer, in its sole discretion, is not satisfied with its Due. Diligence Review. If not so terminated, the Escrow Deposit shall become non-refundable to Buyer; provided, however, the Escrow Deposit shall still be credited against the purchase price in the event the transaction closes. Buyer further agrees to provide Seller with copies of any and all governmental submittals and due diligence materials obtained by Buyer upon Seller's request therefor. 2 10. Deed and Other Documents. On or before the Closing Date: (a) Seller: Seller shall deliver to Escrow Agent or Buyer, as may be appropriate: (i) An executed and acknowledged . Warranty Deed in recordable form, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, and encumbrances except as provided in this Agreement, with a release of dower, curtesy, homestead, and other spousal rights, subject only to current real estate taxes (to be apportioned between the parties as set forth in this Agreement) and covenants, conditions, easements, encumbrances and restrictions approved by Buyer in writing; (ii) a Non -Foreign Certificate sufficient to comply with the requirements of Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code (FIRPTA), or, in the alternative, Seller shall cooperate with Buyer in the withholding of funds and delivery of such funds to the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to FIRPTA regulations; (iii) such other documents and affidavits as Buyer, the Title Company, or the Escrow Agent may reasonably require, including without limitation, appropriate corporate certificates of status and authorizing resolutions; and (iv) written instructions to Escrow Agent directing it to close the transaction. (v) Declaration of Value and Groundwater Hazard Statement, (b) Buyer: Buyer shall deliver to Escrow Agent, Seller or Tenant, as maybe appropriate: (i) the purchase price in escrow with the Escrow Agent, together with any other amounts required to be paid by Buyer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; (ii) such other documents and affidavits as Seller, the Title Company, or the Escrow Agent may reasonably require, including without limitation, appropriate corporate certificates of status and authorizing resolutions; and (iii) written instructions to Escrow Agent directing it to close the transaction. 11. Costs and Expenses. Closing costs and expenses shall be apportioned as follows: a) Seller shall pay (i) any required state documentary or transfer taxes relative to the transfer of the Premises, (ii) any preliminary abstracting, if required, (iv) Escrow Agent's closing fee, and (v) Seller's own attorney fees. b) Buyer shall pay (i) any required charges to obtain Buyer's loan, if any, (ii) any charges to record any mortgage granted by Buyer and any required state documentary taxes resulting therefrom, (iii) recording charges to record the Warranty Deed, (iv) the cost of any title insurance, and (v) Buyer's own attorney fees. c) Any other closing costs or expenses not covered by this Section or otherwise allocated to a party in this Agreement, shall be in accordance with the customs and practices in the locale wherein the Premises is located. 12. Real Estate Taxes. Seller shall be responsible for and pay the real estate taxes for the fiscal year in which the Closing occurs, prorated to the date of Closing, and the real estate taxes for all prior years. Buyer shall be responsible for making all payments of real estate taxes becoming due and payable after the date of Closing. 13. Condition of Premises. The Premises as of the date of this Agreement, including buildings, grounds, and all improvements, will be preserved by the Seller in its present condition until possession, ordinary wear and tear excepted. 14. Risk of Loss. Risk of loss of the Premises shall remain with Seller until the Closing Date. 15. Casualty and Condemnation. Seller will give Buyer immediate written notice of any damage to the Premises by reason of (i) fire or other casualty occurring prior to the Closing Date, (ii) any actual or threatened condemnation of all or any part of any Premises prior to Closing, or (iii) any other act which occurs prior to Closing which has the effect of interrupting the normal and customary operations of the business transacted on the Premises (if applicable). In the event of such a casualty or condemnation, Buyer may terminate this Agreement by written notice to the Seller and, in such event, no party shall have any further rights, obligations or liabilities under this Agreement, except as related to return of the Escrow Deposit to Buyer. 16. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES. "AS IS" CONVEYANCE. BUYER ACKNOWLEDGES TO AND AGREES WITH SELLER THAT BUYER'S PURCHASE OF THE PREMISES SHALL BE "AS IS, -'-WHERE IS," AND "WITH ALL FAULTS" AND WITH ALL PATENT OR LATENT DEFECTS. 17. gMM.ONMENTAL DISCLOSURE AND RELEASE. Seller has disclosed its available records of any known current environmental conditions for the Premises Buyer. Buyer acknowledges that it has received and reviewed any available environmental data and that the Premises may have been, and may continue to be a petroleum outlet and/or service station. Buyer recognizes that contamination may be present the Premises. Seller will make commercially reasonable efforts to transfer to Buyer its interest, if any, in the UST fund of the state in which any Premises is located, or the UST insurance policy, as applicable, to the extent allowed by law if additional work is required in the future. Buyer may at its sole option and expense perform a Phase N environmental audit of the property within 30 days after the date of full execution and delivery 4 of this Agreement. If the Phase II environmental audit indicates a release from the underground petroleum storage tanlca, piping, or dispensing facilities, Seller will indemnify Buyer for actual expenses up to, but no more than, the deductible amount from the insurance benefit under the applicable state's UST fund or the UST insurance policy applicable to releases from petroleum storage tanks. EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS OF SELLER CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT, SELLER IS HEREBY RELEASED FROM AND BUYER HEREBY ASSUMES ALL RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY REGARDING THE PRESENCE IN THE SOIL, AIR, STRUCTURES, AND SUBSURFACE AND SURFACE WATERS, OF MATERIALS OR SUBSTANCES THAT HAVE BEEN OR MAY IN THE FUTURE BE DETERMINED TO BE TOXIC, HAZARDOUS, OR THE SUBJECT OF REGULATION AND THAT MAY NEED TO BE SPECIALLY TREATED, HANDLED, AND/OR REMOVED FROM THE PREMISES UNDER CURRENT OR FUTURE FEDERAL, STATE, AND/OR LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BUYER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS SELLER FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS ARISING FROM OR RELATED TO THE PRESENCE OF SUCH MATERIALS OR SUBSTANCES, INCLUDING REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL AND ATTORNEYS' FEES ARISING FROM ANY SUCH CLAIM. 18. Buyer's Conditions Precedent. Buyer's obligation to close this transaction is expressly conditioned upon each of the following: a) Seller shall have performed and complied in all material respects with all agreements, terms, and conditions requited by this Agreement to be performed by and complied with by Seller on or before the Closing Date. b) All representations, warranties and covenants of Seller contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the Closing Date. e) Buyer obtaining formal approval by the City Council of Iowa City. If any of Buyer's conditions precedent have not been satisfied or complied with prior to the Closing Date, Buyer may, by written notice to Seller on or before such Closing Date, cancel and terminate this AgreemenL In the event that this Agreement is terminated by Buyer as permitted by this Section, then upon such termination neither party shell retain any rights or obligations under this Agreement, except that if terminated prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Review Period, the Escrow Deposit shall be returned to Buyer. If Buyer terminates this Agreement after the expiration of the Due Diligence Review period, the Escrow Deposit shall be immediately delivered to Seller. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer, in its sole discretion, may waive any conditions precedent in its favor and elect to proceed with the Closing prior to the termination of this Agreement. 19. Remedies of the Parties. a) Buyer's Remedies. In the event that the purchase and sale of the Premises does not close because of a breach of this Agreement on the part of Seller, then Buyer shall have as its sole and exclusive remedy a return of the Escrow Deposit. b) Seller's Remedies. 1n the event that the purchase and sale of the Premises does not close because of a breach of this Agreement on the part of Buyer, then Seller shall have as its sole and exclusive remedy the right to retain the Escrow Deposit as liquidated damages, and not as a penalty. c) In the event that the purchase and sale of the Premises does not close, and the failure of the transaction to close is not attributable to a breach by Seller or Buyer, then this Agreement shall terminate, the Escrow Deposit shall be returned to Buyer, and no party will retain any legal rights or remedies against any other party. 20. Notices. Any notice, demand or other communication under this Agreement by any party to another party shall be in writing and shall be validly given (i) upon delivery when hand delivered, (ii) upon receipt of confirmation of delivery when transmitted by facsimile, (iii) one (1) business day after being sent via overnight courier, or (iv) three (3) business days after being deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, in each case addressed to the parties as the addresses set forth below the signatures at the end of this Agreement. Either party may change its address set forth below the signatures at the end of this Agreement by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner set forth in this paragraph. 21. Cooperation. Seller and Buyer agree to cooperate fully with one another in taking any reasonable actions necessary or helpful to accomplish the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, including, but not limited to, the satisfaction of any conditions to Closing set forth in this Agreement. 22. Assignment. Buyer shall not have the right to assign this Agreement without the written consent of Seller. 23. Broker. Each party represents to the other than no other broker, finder or intermediary is involved in the purchase and sale of the Premises. Each party hereby indemnifies and agrees to hold the other parties harmless from and against any and all costs arising or resulting, directly or indirectly, out of any claim by any broker or finder in connection with this transaction due to their respective acts. 24. Construction. Words and phrases shall be construed as in the singular or plural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender according to the definitions and the context. 25. Binding Contract. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 26. Counterparts, This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 27. Facsimile. For purposes of executing this Agreement, a facsimile signature shall be as effective as an actual signature. Ci 28. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws and public policies of the State of Iowa. 29. Certification. Seller certifies that it is not acting, directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of any person, group, entity or nation named by any Executive Order or the United States Treasury Department as a terrorist, "Specially Designated National and Blocked Person" or any other banned or blocked person, entity, nation or transaction pursuant to any law, order, rule or regulation that is enforced or administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control; and are not engaged in this transaction, directly or indirectly on behalf of, any such person, group, entity or nation. Seller hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Buyer from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, risks, liabilities and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs) arising from or related to any breach of the foregoing certification. 30. Survival. The representations, warranties, and agreements of the parties contained herein shall survive the closing date. 31. Buyer Acceptance. This Agreement shall be null and void if not executed by Buyer and returned to Seller via the method for delivering valid notice on or before February 7, 2020. SELLER: Dated: /-30--20ZO KUM & GO, L.C. By: tpK/N �l` ��/Y t�Zl 16 Its: 4 V ( Joh r/ ro fo T Fed. I.D. No.: 42-1352663 Facsimile: 515-457-6179 Address: 1459 Grand Avenue Des Moines, IA 50309 7 Dated: /-,70 Zozs CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA By: A _ -- Its: City Manager or designee FedI.D.No.:_42- 6004805 Telepbone:319-356-5030Facsimile:319- 356-5497_ Address: 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240 Prenared by and wbcn recorded return to: Kum & Go L C Arm Joel Huston'. 1459 Graud Ave -Des Moines, IA 50309 DECLARATION OF USE RESTRICTION THIS INSTRUMENT effective the day of , 20_, (the "Effective Date") is made by the undersigned owner of the Restricted Parcel (hereinafter referred to as the "Burdened Party'); WITNESSETH: RECITALS A. Burdened Party is the owner of the Restricted Parcel (defined below); and B. Burdened Party desires to place certain use restrictions on the Restricted Parcel. NOW, THEREFORE, BURDENED PARTY HEREBY DECLARES AND IMPOSES THE FOLLOWING: , Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated by this reference. 2. Restricted Parcel. The use restrictions imposed herein are imposed upon the following parcels of real estate (the "Restricted Parcel"), to -wit: Auditors Parcel 99093, according to the Plat of Survey recorded in Book 41, Page 67, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, being a portion of Auditor's Parcel "A", as recorded in Plat Book 33, Page 72, Records of Johnson County, Iowa, and located in the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 22, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, the boundaries of which are described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast coiner of Auditor's Parcel "A", as recorded in Plat Book 33, Page 72, Records of Johnson County, Iowa; thence N25°34'48"W, along the Easterly lune of said Auditor's Parcel, 280.61 feet to the Southeast comer of an acquisition plat; thence S64°25'12"W, along the Southerly line of said acquisition plat, 17.00 feet, to the point of beginning; thence continuing S64°25112"W, 60.00 feet; thence Southwesterly, 315.08 feet along an arc of a 1174.26 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly, whose 314.13 foot chord bears S72°06'24"W; thence N10°12'23"W, 231.26 feet; thence N64'25'1 2"E, 310.00 feet to the Northwest corncr of said acquisition plat; thence S25134'48"E, along the Westerly line of said acquisition plat, 265.00 feet to said point of beginning. 3. Use Restrictions. During the term of this declaration the Restricted Parcel shall not be used for any of the following: a. A gasoline station, including any type of business that sells diesel fuel, ethanol fuel, bio -fuel or any other type of fuel used to power motorized vehicles designed primarily for use on public streets and highways. This restriction shall not include fuel facilities owned by the City of Iowa City that supply fuel for governmental agencies. b. A convenience store. c. A cigar, tobacco or pipe shop. d. A business that generates more than fifty percent (50%) of its gross revenue from the sale of beer or liquor products for off premise consumption. e. An adult bookstore, adult theatre, "adult entertainment" facility, or any business that sells pornographic or sexually explicit material. 4. Tenn. The use restrictions imposed against the Restricted Parcel shall remain in full force and effect for a period of 20 years from the Effective Date, at which time said use restrictions shall automatically expire. The owner of the Restricted Parcel shall not revoke, and hereby relinquishes any right to revoke, the use restrictions imposed by ibis instrument. Only the beneficiary of the use restrictions imposed by this instrument, Kum & Go, L.C., shall be entitled to revoke or release said use restrictions. 5. Restrictions Run with Land. The use restrictions imposed by this instrument shall constitute covenants running with the land and, as such, shall be binding upon the owners from time -to -time of the Restricted Parcel and their respective heirs, successors and assigns. 6. Severability. If any provision of this instrument is invalid, illegal or incapable of being enforced by any law or public policy, all other provisions of this declaration shall remain in full force and effect. N IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Burdened Party has caused this Declaration of Use Restriction to be executed on or as of the day and year first above written. KG STORE 526, L.L.C. 0 Its: BURDENEDPARTY STATE OF , COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me by as of KG Store 526, L.L.C. Notary Public Ito] on Item Number: 7.c. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Equipment Division of the Public Works Department by adding one full-time Mechanic I — Equipment, grade 9. Prepared By: Dan Striegel, Equipment Superintendent Reviewed By: Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: Depending on step the candidate is hired, up to $92,790 annually for wages and benefits. Recommendations: Staff: Approval AUTO 171.2►/_1 Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: The existing employee filling the Mechanic I daytime position in the Equipment Divison is in the Iowa National Guard. Their battalion has been ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom - Operation Spartan Shield. They will be deployed up to 400 days. Staff is seeking the approval to add one full time Mechanic I position to maintain the current level of service. Background /Analysis: The Mechanic I position is a vital part of the Equipment Division team. There currently are two Mechanic I positions in the Equipment Division. One person works on the day team and the other works on the night team. The employee filling the daytime position has been called to active duty and will be deployed for up to 400 days. This proposed staffing increase will maintain the current level of service that is being provided to the City fleet. Staff feels maintaining the current level of service with temporary employees would not be possible due to the skills required. When the employee returns from active duty, the staffing needs will be re-evaluated. If it is determined the staffing level can be decreased, this would be done through attrition. UNA f_1;a:I Lvi l NUTI&V Description Resolution Prepared by Ronald Knoche, Public Works Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565138 Resolution Number 20-36 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Equipment Division of the Public Works Department by adding one full-time Mechanic I — Equipment, grade 9. Whereas, Resolution No. 19-79 adopted by the City Council on March 12, 2019, authorized budgeted positions in the Equipment Division of the Public Works Department for Fiscal Year 2020; and Whereas, the employee filling the Mechanic I - Equipment position was deployed by the National Guard and will be on active for one year; and Whereas, the Equipment Division will need an additional Mechanic I position to provide the current level of service; and Whereas, it is in the City's best interest to adopt this resolution. Now Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: The budgeted positions in the Equipment Division of the Public Works Department be amended by adding one full-time Mechanic I - Equipment position, grade 9. Passed and approved this 18th day of February _,2020 7_IAA� or App ed by Attest: c3 02� Ci Clerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by Taylor and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: the Resolution be Absent: Bergus Mims 3allh Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner -7. Item Number: 7.d. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Amending budgeted positions in the Purchasing Division of the Finance Department by deleting one full-time Purchasing Clerk position, and adding one full-time Purchasing Assistant position, and amending the AFSCME pay plan by deleting the position of Purchasing Clerk, grade 2, and creating the position of Purchasing Assistant, grade 4. Prepared By: Sarah Betlach, Purchasing Agent Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager Fiscal Impact: The range of total fiscal impact is $3,306 - $4,260, inclusive of salary and benefits, depending on pay step within the pay grade. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: In the Purchasing Division of the Finance Department, the 1.00 FTE Purchasing Clerk position, grade 2, is requested to be replaced with a 1.00 FTE Purchasing Assistant position, grade 4. The Purchasing Assistant position is a new position that we are requesting to add to the AFSCME pay plan, replacing the position of Purchasing Clerk. Background /Analysis: The existing Purchasing Clerk position in the Finance Department was recently vacated. The needs of the Purchasing Division were reviewed and reassessed. Following that reassessment, a new job description, Purchasing Assistant, was created that better aligned with the Department's needs. An evaluation of the new position has determined that grade 4 of the AFSCME pay plan is the appropriate classification for this position. The maximum financial impact of the position change is an increase in expenditures of approximately $3,306-$4,260, inclusive of salary ad benefits, dependent on the step at which the person is hired. This position is budgeted 50% in the Purchasing Division in the General Fund and 50% in the Central Services Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Dennis Bockenstedl, Finance Director, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5053 Resolution number 2n -,j7 Resolution amending budgeted positions in the Purchasing Division of the Finance Department by deleting one full-time Purchasing Clerk position, and adding one full-time Purchasing Assistant position, and amending the AFSCME pay plan by deleting the position of Purchasing Clerk, grade 2, and creating the position of Purchasing Assistant, grade 4. Whereas, Resolution No. 19-79, adopted by the City Council on March 12, 2019, authorized budgeted positions in the Purchasing Division of the Finance Department for FY20; and Whereas, Resolution No. 17-14, adopted by the City Council on January 3, 2017, established a classification/compensation plan for AFSCME employees; and Whereas, a vacancy in the position of Purchasing Clerk has allowed for a reassessment of Purchasing Division needs, which would be better served by replacing the Purchasing Clerk position with a Purchasing Assistant position, more accurately reflecting the responsibilities of the needed position and classifying it with positions of similar responsibility. Now, Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The budgeted positions in the Purchasing Division of the Finance Department be amended by: a. Deleting one full-time Purchasing Clerk position, AFSCME grade 2. b. Adding one full-time Purchasing Assistant position, AFSCME grade 4. 2. The AFSCME pay plan be amended by: a. Deleting the position of Purchasing Clerk, AFSCME grade 2. b. Adding the position of Purchasing Assistant, AFSCME grade 4. Passed and approved this 18th day of Feb r _,2020 Mayor Ap ved by Attest: City Clerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by Taylor and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner -1 A Item Number: 8.a. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project (BROS-3715(663)--8J-52), and directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Melissa Clow, Special Project Administrator Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $1,370,000, available in the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement account #S3935 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Location Map Resolution Executive Summary: The Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project includes the removal and replacement of the existing triple corrugated metal pipe culverts with new reinforced concrete box culverts, as well as roadway, utility and other associated improvements. Roadway improvements on Prentiss Street begin approximately 100 feet east of South Linn Street and extend to South Dubuque Street. Improvements on South Linn Street extend 200 feet north of Prentiss Street. Storm sewer on Prentiss Street is being replaced to increase capacity and reduce surcharging during large rainfall events. The project also includes improvements to ADA sidewalk ramps, creek slope protection and water main. Background /Analysis: The 2015 Biennial Bridge Inspection Program reported that the Prentiss Street Bridge over Ralston Creek is suffering from bulging and severe corrosion of the corrugated metal pipe culverts, damaged and undermined inlet and headwall and cracked street pavement. Recent pavement replacement in the area uncovered significant voiding under the pavement, further emphasizing the need for the project. The bridge is limited to a 20 -ton weight embargo due to its current condition. In addition, the existing storm sewer along Prentiss Street, from Ralston Creek to S. Dubuque Street is undersized and has a history of surcharging during large rain events. The City contracted with IIW, P.C. of Dubuque, IA in May, 2018 for consulting services. Final design plans will be submitted to the Iowa Department of Transportation (I DOT) on February 3, 2020 for the April 21, 2020 bid letting. The project will be bid through the I DOT, but construction administration and inspection will be performed by the City. Final design plans were previously submitted to the I DOT for the January 22, 2020 bid letting. However, during the bidding period, a number of deficiencies were discovered. The I DOT determined that the necessary changes would be considered redesign, not appropriate for an addendum and recommended that the City withdraw the project from the scheduled letting. This item begins the bidding process with the revised plans, and the plans, specifications and estimate of cost for construction of the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project have been filed in the Office of the City Clerk for public examination. The estimated cost of construction is $1,370,000. Funding will be provided by the Highway Bridge Program (80% reimbursement of eligible costs up to $1,000,000) and General Obligation Bonds. The project is expected to be completed by fall 2020. ATTACHMENTS: Description Location Map Resolution 2018 Iowa City Construction Projects _ � 7 1 Project Location ' PRENTISS 47ill � l7! W }}++ ---- e r WRIGHT _ 0 Prentiss St Bridge Replacement N A Prepared by:_Melissa A. Clow, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5413 Resolution No. 20-38 Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project (BROS-3715(663)--8J-52), and directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement - Account # S3935. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: A public hearing on the plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-mentioned project is to be held on the 3rd day of March, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. A copy of the plans, specifications and estimate of cost for the construction of the above- named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this 18th day of February , 2020 Attest: City Clerk It was moved by 'Taylor adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: rtayor proved_ b, , City Attorney's Office by Salih the Resolution be Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 8.b. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Water Distribution East Pressure Zone Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Jon Durst, Asst. Water Superintendent Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $240,000, available in the Water Distribution Pressure Zone Improvements account #W3301 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Location Map Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item begins the bidding process for the Water Distribution East Pressure Zone Project. This Project generally includes the construction of water distribution system infrastructure to create an east pressure zone. These activities will occur at multiple locations throughout the City to remove water main connections, as well as install fire hydrants, valves, water main, and check valves. Background /Analysis: The Iowa City water distribution system contains approximately 270 miles of water main, four ground storage reservoirs (GSR), and the treatment facility. Pressures in the eastern region of the City need to be higher to allow for continued development. A study of the system and subsequent project recommendations was completed in 2018. The recommended course of action is to create a separate pressure zone on the east side of the City and elevate the pressure set points of the single GSR in this zone to accommodate development. The project recommended to create this zone is spatially distributed and generally includes the installation of check valves and pressure reducing valves, and the need to dead-end or loop water main. ATTACHMENTS: Description Location Map Resolution FvWater Distribution MOD--- -° East Pressure Zone Project 0 Site Locations A4iiA•V1ir � ��' I ��. 't- � - 40 qp- 17— • - • • ' f = �.t y-uL-..� � � P(;:. ''- I '� °_` _. a ,Ik•i+�'rti. !b'1 ._-S. y f �., .. , r ..sem" �' X 1 rt- ,.-. ■ ■ t • } n � IT F ��� A .:1�`: 33.1 i.'r`. s a4 3.'>�, t ;. i '" .n '�° • • � '{� , �' ; 7 �%.q" '"`. All 73 17 r ` 'mac--.�cfi•'�`� � - �% ��."K`z' { _ � � . y � ^ ,.-.-J°` •.--•�=� N,'+�.�� i �li Y� n _ F .. r H +,, N •'�'� h; 9' Hop �� ��'� I. .�� � �w"'�r''C tl�' - t^5wli�si'°>le!'--"1,61.4- Prepared by Jonathan Durst, Assistant Water Superintendent, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5169 Resolution No. 20-39 Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Water Distribution East Pressure Zone Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Water Distribution Pressure Zone Improvements account #W3301. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-mentioned project is to be held on the 3rd day of March, 2020, at 7:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this t exb day of February _'2020 or roveAttest: - / )- -ao City Jerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by 'Taylor and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Sa1ih Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner the Resolution be IN Item Number: 8.c. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Scott, Napoleon, Fairmeadows Park Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Jason Reichart, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Juli Seydell Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost for this project is $395,000 and will be funded by the Napoleon, Scott, Fairmeadows Park Rehabilitation account # R4367 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: Parks Commission reviewed this project at their December 11, 2019 meeting and recommended approval. Attachments: Schematic Drawings and Plan Sheets Resolution Executive Summary: Base bid scope of work for this project includes the removal of existing structures, play equipment, pavements, and utilities, and construction of open shelters, play equipment, sidewalks and accessibility improvements. This project also includes drainage and landscaping improvements. Background /Analysis: The Scott Park playground and shelter were installed in 1999 and are nearing the end of their serviceable life. The play area also lacks accessible paths and safety surface. The 2017 Park Master Plan recommends replacement of the playground and shelter in 2020. This project will also include new safety surfacing and additional concrete paths for increased accessibility. A public meeting was held on August 8, 2019 to collect public input on playground design, color palette, and other general comments concerning park use and needs. Play equipment and colors were selected based on input collected at this meeting. The Napoleon Park playground was originally installed in 2001 and is nearing the end of its serviceable life. The 2017 Park Master Plan identified accessibility issues and maintenance concerns and recommends replacement of the playground, improving site drainage, and installation of concrete paths for increased accessibility. Project alternates include the following: • Add Alternate #1: The additional work and structure at Napoleon Park. • Add Alternate #2: The additional work and structure at Napoleon Park. cost for a proposed 18' x 18' open shade cost for a proposed 24' x 24' open shade The 2017 Park Master Plan identified the Fairmeadows Park playground as being in fair/poor condition with accessibility concerns. The shelter also needs renovation due to maintenance concerns and increased use from splash pad users. This project will replace the shelter, signage, and small child playground, and include an accessible path from the street to the play area. A public meeting was held on August 15, 2019 to collect public input on playground design, color palette, and other general comments concerning park use and needs. Play equipment and colors were selected based on input collected at this meeting. Project Timeline: Set Public Hearing — Hold Public Hearing — Bid Letting — Award Date — Construction Start — Final Completion — ATTACHMENTS: Description Scott Park Schematic Scott Park Plan Napoleon Park Schematic Napoleon Park Plan Fairmeadows Park drawing Fairmeadows Park Plan Resolution February 18, 2020 March 3, 2020 April 1, 2020 April 7, 2020 April 20, 2020 October 30, 2020 MiiLETiaJFM i wo i v T reNT o Iowa City - Scott Park Color Selection Pasts l Iced Coffee Post Caps I Spring Green ST90C:TOFF P082079-009 Metals lBrown Docks IBrown Plastics) Spring Green Table FramzsjWA SUPERIOR Panels l Green TahleTopl Seats j NIA •nom^ Sandwich Panels l NA Roof Color I Green ""� FA r 1 m - 3 � o Z W H � W K LL � Q a — U � O z N O m W J Q O O cet 2 yy _ z W k' t> N aZ y H S NYE R w9 Moo rCeTel I W PoM �, : I Fw, M i w s i v T MTN r: f _ F.:'..w Fairmeadows Park — Play Equipment CUNNINGHA�RECREATION Fairmeadows Park - Option -3 Iowa City, IA k 1 Design • Build • PLAY! Alt 4 w`<,{�*� SNYDER 14 &ASSOCIATES Prepared by: Jason Reichart, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5416 Resolution No. 20-40 Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Scott, Napoleon, Fairmeadows Park Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Napoleon, Scott, Fairmeadows Park Rehabilitation account # R4367. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-mentioned project is to be held on the 3rd day of March 2020, at 7:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this 18th day of February 2020 Attest: It was moved by Tayl or adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Mayor p o ed by 2 -la -� u 1 City Attorney's Office seconded by sa 1 ; t the Resolution be Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 8.d. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Wetherby Park Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Jason Reichart, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Juli Seydell Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost for this project is $585,000 and will be funded by the Wetherby Restroom, Shelter & Playground Upgrades account # R4349. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: Parks Commission reviewed this project at their December 11, 2019 meeting and recommended approval. Attachments: Schematic Drawings and Plan Sheets Resolution Executive Summary: Base bid scope of work for this project includes the removal of existing structures, play equipment, pavements, and utilities, and construction of an open shelter, restroom, play equipment, sidewalks and accessibility improvements. Background /Analysis: The 2017 Park Master Plan identified Wetherby Park playground as being in fair/poor condition with accessibility concerns. The shelter also needs renovation due to maintenance concerns and increased use from splash pad users. This project will replace the shelter, restroom, playground, signage, and additional concrete paths for increased accessibility. Project alternates include the following: • Add Alternate #1: Rubberized surface for the swing area A public meeting was held on August 15, 2019 to collect public input on playground design, color palette, and other general comments concerning park use and needs. Play equipment and colors were selected based on input collected at this meeting Project Timeline: Set Public Hearing — Hold Public Hearing — Bid Letting — Award Date — Construction Start — Final Completion — ATTACHMENTS: Description Schematic Drawing Plan Sheet Resolution February 18, 2020 March 3, 2020 April 1, 2020 April 7, 2020 April 20, 2020 October 30, 2020 abw RAIN 9 GENERALNOTES A. ITEMS SHOWN TO BE REMOVED ON DEMOLITION PLAN HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS PLAN FOR CLARITY OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. SITE LAYOUT PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. PAVEMENTS, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: A. 6" DEPTH PCC. B. 5" DEPTH PCC. 2. PLAYGROUND, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: A. PLAYGROUND AREA. INSTALL PLAY EQUIPMENT, SUBDRAIN, AND ENGINEERED WOOD FIBER SURFACING. B. SWINGS AREA. INSTALL SWINGS, SUBDRAIN, AND ENGINEERED WOOD FIBER SURFACING. ENGINEERED WOOD FIBER IS BASE BID. C. LINE SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE SAFETY ZONE FOR PLAY EQUIPMENT. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SAFETY ZONE LIMITS MEETS REQUIREMENTS. D. ADD ALTERNATE 1: PROVIDE POURED -IN-PLACE RUBBERIZED PLAY SURFACE. COLOR: RED 3. BUILDINGS, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: A. ROMTEC RESTROOM WITH PCC FLOOR. RESTROOM DOOR ORIENTED TOWARD PARKING LOT. SEE DETAILS. B. ROMTEC SHELTER; CENTERED IN PCC SLAB. SEE DETAILS. 4. TEMPORARY FENCING FOR CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: A. PROVIDE 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE FOR CONSTRUCTION FENCING WITH TOP RAIL. PROVIDE GATES WITH LOCKS. ADJUST LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. FUTURE SITE FURNISHINGS BY OWNER (NOT IN CONTRACT) A. GRILL. B. BENCH. C. BIKE RACK. 6. ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED: A. ELECTRIC SERVICE LINE IN CONDUIT. CONNECT TO NEW SHELTER AND RESTROOM. B. ELECTRIC PEDESTAL; SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH MIDAMERICAN ENERGY. C. ELECTRIC METER CONNECTED TO PEDESTAL. SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY MIDAMERICAN. COORDINATE WITH MIDAMERICAN ENERGY. D. FIELD VERIFY EXISTING DISCONNECTED ELECTRIC SERVICE LINE AND CONNECT TO NEW PEDESTAL. COORDINATE WITH MIDAMERICAN ENERGY. E. APPROX. LOCATION OF EXISTING SERVICE LINE FROM EXISTING TRANSFORMER/ ELECTRIC BOX ((NOT SHOWN) NORTH OF EXISTING PARKING LOT. 7. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, SEE GRADING PLAN. 8. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: A. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE AND REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE FROM EXISTING BUILDING IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION SHOWN AND INSTALL CLEANOUT. B. PROVIDE 6" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE TO NEW RESTROOM BUILDING AS NECESSARY. C. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING SERVICE OR NECESSARY IMPROVEMENTS ARE INCIDENTAL TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. PLANT SCHEDULE TYPE KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME NOTES Z) U) CO Celtis occidentalis COMMON HACKEBERRY B & B ocnw O Lu QB Quercis rubra NORTHERN RED OAK B & B `U C) ~ TC Tillia cordata 'Greenspire' GREENSPIRE LINDEN B & B * HYDRO -SEED ALL AREAS DISCTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION BY USING BONDED FIBER MATRIX WITH TYPE 1 PERMANENT LAWN SEED MIX. SEE SUDAS 9010. ** ADD 6' DIA. SHDEDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RINGS AROUND ALL NEW TREES ON PROJECT. MAX. 3" DEPTH. 0 10 FEET Cl) H Z W 2W O a Y Q a m W 2 H W co m U cn cn O z Q ~ o o 0 Q N � N m N U � Yr F-- a� a� O U � � � N fn 0 0 Z D O V Z '0'^ V+ Z 0 F— U a 0 W H w w H U) W W z w ira wl 0 N M 0 U 0 M 0 N U LO Cu Q L � 0 O U O co LO I? M V Z S N Y D E R &ASSOCIATES Project No: 119.0513.01 Sheet C200 U z Q ~ o o O N � m N w � Yr a� a� O U � M LO 0 T- Z moco L: N Cu Z o z w U F-- O a- 0 0 Z D O V Z '0'^ V+ Z 0 F— U a 0 W H w w H U) W W z w ira wl 0 N M 0 U 0 M 0 N U LO Cu Q L � 0 O U O co LO I? M V Z S N Y D E R &ASSOCIATES Project No: 119.0513.01 Sheet C200 Prepared by: Jason Reichart, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5416 Resolution No. )n_r,I Resolution setting a public hearing on March 3, 2020 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Wetherby Park Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Wetherby Restroom, Shelter & Playground Upgrades account # R4349. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-mentioned project is to be held on the 31 day of March 2020, at 7:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this 18th day of February _'2020 r proved b`—� Attest: City Clerk City Attorney's Office It was moved by Taylor and seconded by salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 11.c. CITY OIF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org February 18, 2020 Resolution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street in the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown Zone. (DRC19-04) UNA f_Ta:I Lvi 1 NUTI&V Description Memo to City Manager PZ Staff Memo PZ Staff Memo -Attach 1 - Rezoning Ord and CZA PZ Staff Memo -Attach 2a - West Bldg PZ Staff Memo -Attach 2b - East Bldg PZ Staff Memo -Attach 3 - Management Plan PZ Prelim Minutes Resolution Correspondence from Tim Weitzel Correspondence from Colin Lakadat Correspondence from Greg Shill � r CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CIN OF LITERATURE Date: January 27, 2020 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner on behalf of the Form -Based Code Committee Re: Level II Design Review — 12 E. Court Street On January 16, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the height bonus and development rights transfers requested for the property at 12 E. Court Street. This P&Z review and recommendation was required by the CZA encumbering this property. Based on the information provided by the applicant, the Staff Form -Based Code Committee found that the proposal met the requirements of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. Although it meets the technical requirements of the code, awarding the bonus height is at the sole discretion of the City Council. Staff recommends approving the application and security plan, with the following modifications and details: 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re -design of the Capital Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. Upon submittal of a site plan review application, Owner shall provide details to confirm compliance with the Security Plan, including, but not limited to, information demonstrating that video surveillance covers all ingress and egress points and the publicly -accessible exterior common areas with adequate lighting, protocols for PD access, security system repair, and security staff training. Additional detail shall also be provided demonstrating that the academic amenity space will be adequately furnished and equipped in a manner that is clearly intended to support the academic endeavors of the residents. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the Owner shall revise the Security Plan to require a minimum of 3 24-7 uniformed security (non -maintenance) personnel is provided on-site and provide a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby in both buildings 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. Council approval shall be required if the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials. 8. The landscaping and hardscaping on the private property and within the Capitol Street and Court Street rights-of-way shall be maintained by owner in a manner consistent with the submitted landscape plans, or as otherwise allowed and approved by the City Forester. The Commission recommended approval of the height bonus request by a vote of 5-2 (Dyer and Townsend in the negative) subject to the following: Re -design of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review and approval by the City Engineer, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street; January 30, 2020 Page 2 2. Revisions to the Security Plan to include details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc.; 3. The provision of additional detail on the academic amenity space; 4 The bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non- opaque fencing; 5. Council approval of substantive deviations from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials The Commission did not support staff's recommendation to remove the skywalk and the balconies. The Commission generally felt that the skywalk would provide a safe route for students between the buildings and also provide a warmer route during cold days. The Commission also supported the balconies because they provide air and access to the outdoor and are often a sought-after amenity. Staff continues to recommend removal of the balconies and skywalk. Staff is concerned that the skywalk across Capital Street could block an important viewshed of the Old Capital. In addition, it could potentially divert activity away from the street -level, and would not provide a public benefit. In terms of the balconies, staff does not support the proposed balconies on a student housing project of this scale. The applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies; however, staff is concerned with the visual appearance of fully screened balconies, especially with the metal and wiring solutions that have been presented. Staff also has concerns related to noise and nuisances, even with the fully screened balconies. t =�, _4 CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: January 16, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, on behalf of the Staff Form -Based Code Committee Re: Level I I Design Review — 12 E. Court Street Introduction Staff received a design review application last year, which includes a height bonus request, for the property at 12 E. Court Street. On January 16, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review these plans and make a recommendation to the City Council. This memo includes the project background, outlines the height bonus request, generally describes the project, and outlines the specific criteria used in the review. Although the Form - Based Code Committee has determined that the project meets the requirements of the form - based code, this is a discretionary process and staff has identified some concerns. The main concerns are as follows: • The applicant has proposed a skywalk between the two proposed buildings that extends across the proposed Capital Street extension. The skywalk is not supported by staff. • The proposed buildings include fully screened balconies. Although the screens are included for safety reasons, staff is concerned that the fully screened balconies will detract from the visual appearance of the buildings and does not support the balconies. • The plans include a proposed design for the Capital Street extension, which staff does not support. Staff recommends that the proposed right-of-way be redesigned to City specifications. Background In April 2018, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a rezoning of approximately 3.41 acres of land located at 12 E. Court Street from the High Density Multi - Family Residential (RM -44) zone to the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown (RFC -SD) zone subject to conditions related to the dedication of right-of-way along Capital Street, streetscape improvements, and additional review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In September 2018, the City Council adopted the rezoning subject to conditions related to the following [Attachment 1]: 1. Dedication of the Capital Street right-of-way; 2. Obtain approval of the exterior design elevations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. If Level II design review is required for bonus height, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council; 3. Build the Capital Street right-of-way to City specifications; 4. Streetscape improvements to enhance the pedestrian environment; 5. Satisfaction of the affordable housing requirements; 6. Compliance with the building footprints shown for this area in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan; 7. Development of a landscaped interior courtyard on the eastside of the project site; 8. Approval by the City Manager of the owner's architect team; and 9. If requesting bonus height, that the project "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". January 9, 2020 Page 2 Projects located in Riverfront Crossings zoning districts are subject to design review by the staff Form -Based Code Committee. The Form -Based Code Committee's responsibility is ensuring that the plans comply with the form -based regulations. Staff received a complete application for design review in July 2019, which included a request for a height bonus. This request not only requires review by staff, but also by the Planning and Zoning Commission due to the rezoning condition, and the City Council. Bonus Height Request The applicant has requested seven stories of bonus height for two proposed 15 story, mixed - used buildings. The base maximum height in the RFC -SD zone is eight stories, but the maximum bonus height allowed is 15 stories through the discretionary design review process. The building height bonus provisions in the form -based code for Riverfront Crossings create an incentive for developers to incorporate features that provide a public benefit or that further important goals and objectives of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Requests for bonus height are reviewed by the Form -Based Code Committee through the Design Review process. Up to two stories of bonus height may be approved administratively by staff. Height bonus requests above two stories or transfer of development right requests (e.g. public right-of-way) must be approved by City Council through the Level II design review process. As is shown in Table 1, the applicant is requesting seven stories of bonus height for both the west and east buildings by meeting the approval criteria for public right-of-way height transfers, historic preservation height transfers, and bonus height for student housing as set forth in 14- 2G -7G of the zoning code. Table 1. Summa of Bonus Hei ht Request In addition to the specific approval criteria, the code also requires that that all proposals must demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. See Attachment 2 for the applicant's submission to the Form -Based Code Committee, which includes building elevations and renderings, site plan, landscaping plans, and floor plans. Attachment 3 includes additional perspectives provided by the applicant General Description of the Project The two buildings are proposed on a sloping site between Burlington and Court Streets along the proposed extension of Capital Street west of the Voxman Music Building. See Figure 1. West Building Request Type Bonus Height East Building Request Type Bonus Height Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Floors 9-14 Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Floors 9-14 Historic Preservation Height Transfer Floors 14-15 Historic Preservation Hei ht Transfer n/a Student Housing Floor 15 Student Housing Floor 15 In addition to the specific approval criteria, the code also requires that that all proposals must demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. See Attachment 2 for the applicant's submission to the Form -Based Code Committee, which includes building elevations and renderings, site plan, landscaping plans, and floor plans. Attachment 3 includes additional perspectives provided by the applicant General Description of the Project The two buildings are proposed on a sloping site between Burlington and Court Streets along the proposed extension of Capital Street west of the Voxman Music Building. See Figure 1. January 9, 2020 Page 3 Figure 1. Location of Proposed Project T EE V " 1 F ■ a - �� • BURLING10N '~ • r .E -■ ■ ■k ■ •tic � ' 7� 1 ���+ COJfiI � • • + � F 04._m � 11. West Building The west building is proposed west of the Capital Street extension. The proposed 15 -story building will include 492 dwelling units and 3 levels of underground parking. The first floor (and a portion of the basement level) of the building will include non-residential uses along Burlington Street, Capital Street, and Court Street, as well as some residential units that face the main courtyard area and alley. The non-residential uses include a proposed office use along Court Street, a retail use at the intersection of Burlington and Capital Streets and academic amenity space along Capital Street. The applicant has described the academic spaces as including study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi. In terms of recreational amenities, the plans show a half basketball court, a track, a jacuzzi area, and an outdoor pool deck along Burlington Street. Trash and recycling areas are provided on each floor and small community study areas (approximately 220 square feet) are provided on floors 4-15. The plans also show that the on- site parking and open space requirements have been met. Specifically, the code requires 239 vehicle parking spaces and 241 are proposed. The plans also include spaces for scooter and bicycle parking. In terms of open space, the plans show that 15,037 square feet of open space will be provided through the provision of one large, landscaped, public courtyard; two smaller, landscaped, public forecourts, and two smaller, private courtyards. The main courtyard space extends from Capital Street west to the alley behind the building. It is 48 feet wide and is open for the first three stories of the building. See Figures 2 and 3 for more information on the proposed open space areas. Two additional private courtyard spaces are provided along the alley side of the building and two, public forecourt spaces open up to Capital Street. Table 2 provides a summary of the west building. January 9, 2020 Page 4 Figure 2. Overview of Open Space Areas { -- Blue areas indicate public open space and green areas indicate private open space. Figure 3. East Perspective of the West Building Public Courtyard January 9, 2020 Page 5 Table 2. West Building Summary Stories Proposed 15 Required/Allowed 8 max base height 15 max bonus height Dwelling Units 492 n/a Bedrooms 953 n/a Vehicle Parking 241 239 Bicycle Parking 278 271 Open Space 15,037 sq ft 9,530 sq ft Office 3,649 sq ft n/a Retail 1,699 sq ft n/a Flex Space non-residential 1,473 sq ft n/a Recreational Amenities 16,996 sq ft n/a Academic Amenities 9,211 sq ft n/a East Building The east building is proposed east of the Capital Street extension. The proposed 15 -story building will include 426 dwelling units and 3 levels of underground parking. The first floor of the building will include non-residential uses along Burlington Street, Capital Street, and Court Street. This includes a proposed office space at the corner of Burlington and Capital Streets, academic spaces along Capital Street, and a retail use at the Capital and Court Street intersection. The applicant has described the academic spaces as including study rooms and computer labs with wi-fi. No recreational spaces are provided within the east building; however, it includes a 3,623 square foot restaurant on the 15th floor. The plans demonstrate that the requirements related to on-site parking and open space are met. The code requires 205 vehicle parking spaces and the plans show 208 vehicle spaces, as well as parking for scooters and bicycles. Similar to the west building, the plans show that public and private open space requirements will be met through landscaped forecourts and courtyards. Specifically, the main public courtyard area extends from Capital Street east to the alley and two other smaller, public forecourt spaces open up to Capital Street. See Figure 2, above, for more detail on the proposed open space areas. Table 3 provides a summary of the east building. Table 3. East Building Summary Stories Proposed 15 Required/Allowed 8 max base height 15 max bonus height Dwelling Units 426 n/a Bedrooms 820 n/a Vehicle Parking 208 205 Bicycle Parking 246 244 Open Space 10,332 sq ft 8,200 sq ft Office 9,134 sq ft n/a Retail 1,473 sq ft n/a Restaurant 3,623 sq ft n/a Academic Amenities 9,824 sq ft n/a Materials The applicant has proposed a variety of materials for both buildings, including metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete. Along the first floor of Capital Street the applicant has proposed an artistic component in the form of a graphic panel behind metal screens near building entrances. The renderings show the metal screen with plantings growing up them and the lighted graphic panels behind the screens. See Figure 4. January 9, 2020 Page 6 Figure 4. Metal Panels with Graphic Panels along Capital Street In addition, the applicant has proposed balconies. Due to safety concerns with balconies incorporated into such a large student housing project, the applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies with a perforated panel and a metal screen. The applicant has provided staff with material samples, which staff will bring to the Commission's meeting. Skywalk The applicant has proposed a connection between the east and west buildings via a skywalk, which is located at the fourth floor between the open courtyard area and Burlington Street. Capital Street Right -of -Way The applicant's plans also show the proposed public right-of-way for Capital Street. The plans show a 100 -foot right-of-way, which includes 12.5 -foot walkways on both sides of Capital Street, two 12.5 -foot travel lanes and angled parking. The plans also show planter boxes along both sides of Capital Street and a pedestrian crosswalk aligned with the main courtyards of each building. Saecific Approval Criteria Public Right -of -Way Transfer To qualify for bonus height for a public right-of-way height transfer the applicant must dedicate land (the sending site) that is needed in order to construct or improve rights-of-way necessary to realize the vision of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. In this case, the applicant has agreed to dedicate public right-of-way to re -open Capital Street between Burlington and Court Streets. The transfer of development rights request must be equal to the area of the right-of-way to be dedicated multiplied by the base maximum height allowed. Staff Findings: The applicant has agreed to dedicate public right-of-way that will result in the re- opening of Capital Street per the executed conditional zoning agreement. Based on the amount of right-of-way that will be dedicated the applicant has enough square footage from the sending site (i.e. the proposed ROW) to transfer that development potential to the proposed buildings. In total, the applicant has requested to transfer 304,000 square feet of the ROW development potential to the two buildings. The extension of Capital Street is also envisioned in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and also identified as a primary street on the regulating plan that was adopted as part of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. January 9, 2020 Page 7 That said, staff does not support the proposed design of the Capital Street right-of-way. Specifically, the applicant has proposed angled parking, which staff recommends be changed to parallel parking. Staff would also like to see the width of the travel lanes reduced. The incorporation of parallel parking will ensure consistency with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Reducing the width of the travel lanes and incorporating parallel parking will ensure consistency with the City's recent street reconstruction projects, like Washington Street in downtown. Furthermore, the conditional zoning agreement requires that the applicant build the Capital Street right-of-way to specifications approved by the City Engineer. The current design does not align with the City's expectations. Lastly, staff does not support the proposed skywalk across Capital Street that connects the two buildings. Staff is concerned that it could block views of the Old Capital and potentially divert activity away from the street -level. Historic Preservation Transfer To qualify for bonus height for a historic preservation height transfer the applicant must transfer development potential from an Iowa City historic landmark to a receiving site. The transfer of development rights request must be equal to the acreage of the sending site multiplied by the base maximum height allowed. Staff Findings: The applicant previously supported the designation of the Tate Arms building as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. In 2015, the City Council approved the transfer of a portion of the development potential of the sending site (i.e. Tate Arms) to an adjacent property. As part of this previous agreement, the applicant rehabilitated the Tate Arms building. The current request is to transfer the remaining potential of the Tate Arms building, 27,400 square feet, to 12 E. Court Street. Student Housing Up to 5 floors of additional building height may be granted for projects that are ideally located and designed to provide a high-quality living environment for college students. Student housing height bonus requests must also meet the following criteria: Location Criteria: 1. Projects must be located on land that is within the University Subdistrict, South Downtown Subdistrict, or the West Riverfront Subdistrict; and 2. Is within one thousand feet (1,000') walking distance along public rights-of-way from the University of Iowa campus. Management, Design And Amenity Criteria: 1. An enforceable plan for on site management and security must be submitted to and approved by the City; 2. For projects with 200 or more bedrooms, professional 24 hour on site management and security must be provided. A professionally staffed management office/reception desk must be provided in the entrance lobby of the building; 3. Interior and exterior usable shared open space must be provided with amenities that create a high quality living environment for students. The management plan must include adequate provisions for management, maintenance, and security of such spaces; 4. A secure bicycle parking/storage area shall be provided and maintained within the building or parking garage; 5. The owner shall maintain a valid rental permit and comply with all applicable City codes; 6. The City reserves the right to inspect the property to verify compliance with these provisions. January 9, 2020 Page 8 Staff Findings: The project meets the location criteria. It is located within the South Downtown subdistrict, right across the street from the University of Iowa Campus. As for the management plan, the applicant has submitted a management plan that has been reviewed by the City, including the Police Department [Attachment 4]. The Police Department is comfortable with the direction provided by the applicant to date; however, there are several details to work out. These details include confirmation of camera coverage at points of egress, ingress, common areas, public areas, and businesses; exact protocols for the Police Department accessing video; protocols for timely repairs to the video systems; as well as staffing requirements. In terms of staffing, staff recommends at least three security personnel providing security 24/7. Staff recommends a final administrative review and approval of the management plan, which must include these details, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Although the plans show the provision of academic amenity space in both the west and east buildings, the plans lack detail on how this amenity space creates a high-quality living environment for students. Staff recommends that the applicant provide more justification on the amenity spaces. More specifically, is the amount and type of amenity spaces proposed adequate based on today's student's needs and the size of the project? In addition, staff does not support the proposed balconies on a student housing project of this scale. The applicant has proposed to fully screen the balconies; however, staff is concerned with the visual appearance of fully screened balconies, especially with the metal and wiring solutions that have been presented. The fully enclosed balconies could detract from the higher quality components of the building and still allow for minor nuisances (e.g. noise, debris). The plans demonstrate compliance with the number of required on-site bicycle parking. The bicycle parking provided within the parking garage is secured with a fence enclosure around the bike parking. Staff recommends that this fencing be chain-link or some other non-opaque material for safety reasons. The City will require and ensure that the applicant obtain a rental permit prior to occupancy. Rezoning Conditions In addition to reviewing the project against the bonus height criteria, staff also reviewed the project against the following rezoning conditions: • Development of the subject property must substantially conform to the building footprints shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (page 61). Any significant deviation in the building footprint, as reasonably determined by the City, must be approved by the City Council in a Level II design review process. Staff Findings: Figure 5 shows the image referenced in this rezoning condition. The master plan shows four U-shaped buildings along the Capital Street extension. Staff determined that this condition has been met. Figure 6 shows the comparison of the master plan footprints with the proposed footprints provided in the development plans. Combining the west and east buildings, the plans show 139 linear feet more along the exterior building walls (an increase of 5%) and 2,977 more square feet (an increase of 4.8%). January 9, 2020 Page 9 Figure 5. Image from Page 61 of the Plan, Looking South r ...........`; Figure 6 also helps illustrate that the master plan contemplated four buildings, while the proposal includes two buildings. The proposed plans include a connection at the fourth floor, which results in two buildings, but allows for the public courtyards to extend to the western and eastern edges of the property. Figure 7 shows the proposed connection at the fourth floor above the public courtyard area. See also Figure 3 for the rendering showing the courtyard, which includes the proposed landscaping, amenities, and artistic components. Figure 6. Footprint Comparison — Master Plan v. Proposed Plan M0._TER PLAN PROPOSED FOOTPRINTS FOOTPRINT January 9, 2020 Page 10 • Development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Access to the University of Iowa's Voxman Music Building from the interior courtyard may be restricted or limited for safety reasons if deemed appropriate by the City Council in a Level II design review process. Staff Findings: Staff determined that this condition has also been met. The plans for the east building show an interior courtyard that extends and is open from Capital Street to the alley between the east building and the Voxman Music Building. • In accordance with the Riverfront Crossing Form -Based Code, any request for bonus height shall "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". Staff Findings: The buildings will be constructed of steel and concrete. The proposed materials include metal panels, terracotta, spandrel and regular glass, metal screens, and concrete, which are approval materials per the form -based code. The buildings will have extensive window and door openings, which meet the fenestration requirements of the form -based code. Despite the sloping nature of the site, all entrances from Burlington, Clinton, and Court Streets are designed at -grade. The window and door openings, as well as the at -grade entrances help create a more walkable and inviting environment. To break up the fagade, the buildings are stepped back along Burlington, Court, and Capital Streets. Along Capital Street, the building stepbacks are deeper at the southern end and narrow toward Burlington Street. The stepbacks meet the requirement of at least a 10 -foot stepback above the fifth story. In addition, the forecourt and courtyard openings, in combination with the vertical and horizontal articulation help to create a visually appealing fagade. The open spaces along Capital Street also help to keep visual interest. These spaces are open to the public and provide open seating areas and are fully landscaped. The project is located on a sloping site between the Voxman Music Building and a recent 8 -story residential project at 316 E. Madison Street. To the south of the project site is the Johnson County Courthouse. Although there are no other buildings of this scale in the immediate vicinity, the City Council adopted the form - based code to help incentivize redevelopment in Riverfront Crossing by allowing up to 15 stories through a discretionary process. January 9, 2020 Page 11 Role of the Commission Typically, the Planning and Zoning Commission is not involved in the design review process. However, since a Level II design review is required, the adopted conditional zoning agreement requires that the Planning and Zoning Commission review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council. Recommendation Based on the information provided by the applicant, as described above, the Staff Form -Based Code Committee finds that the proposal meets the requirements of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. Although it meets the technical requirements of the code, awarding the bonus height is at the sole discretion of the City Council. Furthermore, staff recommends the following modifications and details: 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re -design of the Capital Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. An additional administrative review of the management plan that includes details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc. prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional detail and justification on the academic amenity space. 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. If the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, these changes must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. An example of a substantive change is a change to exterior building materials. Attachments: 1. Conditional Zoning Agreement 2. Applicant's Submittal to the Form -Based Code Committee 3. Additional Perspective Provided by the Applicant 4. Applicant's Management Plan Prepared by: Sylvia Bochner, Planning Intem, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, [A 52240; 319-356-5240 (REZ18-00014) Ordinance No. 18-4765 An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 3.41 acres from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) zone to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC -SD) zone located at 12 E. Court Street. (REZ18-00014) Whereas, the applicant, 100-500 LLC, has requested a rezoning of property located at 12 E. Court Street from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC -SD); and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that this property is appropriate for redevelopment of high density multifamily housing that contributes to a pedestrian friendly streetscape; and Whereas, the requested rezoning will result in a significant increase in residential density, necessitating street improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and Whereas, the large scale of the development (equivalent to a square block) necessitates careful consideration of design, and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the reviewed the proposed rezoning and determined that it complies with the Comprehensive Plan provided that it meets conditions addressing the need for compliance with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan including dedication of right of way and construction of Capitol Street; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner and applicant has agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of High Density Multifamily Residential (RM44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC -SD): ALL OF LOT 5, ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND BLOCK 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. Section II. Zoning Map. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section III. Conditional Zon[ng Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Ordinance No. 18--4765 Page 2 Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this 4th day of _ September , 2018. MAVOR 100, ATTEST: CITY CLERK tpZved City Attorneys Office Ordinance No. 18-4765 Page 3 It was moved by Mims and seconded by _ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Thomas that the AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Vacant — Botchway seat x Cole x Mires x Salih x Taylor x Thomas x Throgmorton First Consideration 08/21/2018 Voteforpassage: AYES: Cole, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas, Throgmorton. NAYS: None. ABSENT": Vacant-Botchway seat. Second Consideration ------- Vote for passage: Date published 09/13/2018 Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. Prepared by: Sylvia Bochner, Planning Intem, 490 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5240 (REZ18-00014) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and 100-500, L.L.C. (hereinafter "Owner'). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 3.41 acres of property located at 12 E. Court Street; and Whereas, the Owner has requested the rezoning of said property from High Density Multifamily Residential (RM -44) to Riverfront Crossings—South Downtown Subdistrict (RFC - SD); and Whereas, the requested rezoning will result in a significant increase in residential density, necessitating street improvements for vehicular and pedestrian traffic, and Whereas, the large scale of the development (equivalent to a square block) necessitates careful consideration of design, and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding compliance with the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan, including dedication of right of way and the construction of Capitol Street and streetscape enhancements on Burlington Street, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner acknowledges that certain conditions and restrictions are reasonable to ensure the development of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the need for dedication of right of way and construction of Capitol Street and streetscape improvements on Burlington Street; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows. 1. 100-500 LLC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as ALL OF LOT 5, ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND BLOCK 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT ppdadmfagVrezl8-000014 cza pentacrestgardens81618.doc THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. 2. The Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agrees that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the zoning chapter, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any new development of the subject property, Owner shall; i. Submit and obtain the City's Manager's written approval of a phasing plan for the development. The plan shall include dates by which Owner shall dedicate right of way to the City of sufficient width, as determined by the City, to facilitate the reestablishment of Capitol Street. In no event shall dedication of the Capitol Street Right of Way occur more than 36 months after issuance of the initial building permit, and in no event shall completion of the Capitol Street improvements occur more than 24 months after dedication of the right of way. ii. Obtain approval of the exterior design elevations from the Planning and Zoning Commission. If Level ll design review is required for bonus height, the Planning and Zoning Commission will review the proposed development plan and make a recommendation to the City Council. b. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the City Manager in said phasing plan or an amendment thereto, Owner shall dedicate the Capitol Street Right of Way to the City and build the Capitol Street right-of-way to specifications approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the subject property. c. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any of the subject property, Owner shall install streetscape improvements to enhance the pedestrian environment on Burlington Street and Court Street, as described in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. d. Owner shall satisfy the affordable housing obligations imposed pursuant to Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8 through the provision of on-site owner -occupied dwelling units, on-site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on-site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the City in an affordable housing agreement entered into prior to issuance of a building permit for development of any portion of the above-described property. e. Development of the subject property must substantially conform to the building footprints shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (page 61). Any significant deviation in the building footprint, as reasonably determined by the City, must be approved by the City Council in a Level II design review process. f. Development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Access to the University of Iowa's Voxman Music Building from the interior courtyard may be restricted or limited for safety reasons if deemed appropriate by the City Council in a level II design review process. ppdadnVa9Vrez18-000014 cze pentacrest gardens81618.dx 2 g. The owner's architect team must have demonstrated experience to the City's reasonable satisfaction with both: 1) high-quality urban design; and, 2) large-scale student housing and/or residence halls (exterior and interior). The owner shall submit the qualifications of the architect team to the City Manager prior to the design review process to ensure this condition is met. The City Manager must confirm compliance with this condition in writing prior to the commencement of the design review process. h. In accordance with the Riverfront Crossing Form -Based Code, any request for bonus height shall "demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood". 4. The Owner and City acknowledge that the conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2017), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. The Owner and City acknowledge that in the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all redevelopment will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. The parties acknowledge that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. 7. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. 8. The Owner acknowledges that nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner or Applicant from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 9. The parties agree that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this 4th day of September , 2018. City of Iowa City G. JO Throgmorton, gayor Attest: ppdadmlagt1reZ18-000014 = pentatrestgardensB1618.doc 3 By: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Approved by: �' �Q -F-1 City Attorney's Office City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: STATE OF IOWA ) ) SS: JOHNSON COUNTY } By: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Ll , 20415 by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public i nd for the StatLy of Iowa MAYMy Fx (Stamp or Seal) co 7 28 Title (and Rank) e SAecr + 100-500, L.L.C. Acknowledgment: State of �L-� County of 10, 7 r1 This record was acknowledged before me on d 1 (Date) by Fames f�.Cr'�r-1c (Name{s) of indivi uai( ) as CO «;r -)P r- (type of authority, such as member) of 100-500, L.L.C. Not -Ary Public in and Ft (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) My commission expires: ppdadmfagVrez1B-000014 ma pentacrostgardens81898.dac 4 State of Iowa commtssim MY cWgn! VICINITY MAP KEY PLAN BURLINGTON STREET COURT STREET 12 EAST IOWA CITY, IOWA WEST BUILDING INDEX OF DRAWINGS PRESENTATION G001W TITLE SHEET AND WING SHEET 002W SITE DIAGRAMMING L001W LANDSCA T L002WLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN C001W CIVIL PLAN A10OW LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101W UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A102W SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A103W FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A201W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A205W EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A206W ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS A211W BUILDING SECTIONS A221W BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001W LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN CODE REVIEW General Information Residential Unit Count Motor Vehicle Parking Count Required Provided Bike Parking Count Required Provided Building Amenity Car Stalls 241 (3 car stal s wil be designe as 69 scooter stalls) 1 stall for f 0 resides, 1/2 stall for remaining residential units 50 + (1/2 *442t- 271 Interior q228 Exterior 50 Interior Academic 9,211 sq.ft Interior Recreation 16,215 sq.ft. Exterior 16,996 sq.ft 42,422 sq.ft Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" - " 4'-0" +/-) at Ca itol Street Rear 5'-0" - Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Fie with subordinate Forecourt Glazing between 2 and 10 Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Proposed 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedr Required U953s ft. per bedroom q.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt W11,796sq.ft. Forecourt W2 ,,356sq.ft. Courtyard W1 L2,275sq.ft. 660sq.ft. Courtyard W2 Courtyard W3 950 sq.ft.037 s .ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provided 25%(min) See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed at sending site) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Transfer 153,936 sq.ft. transfered to east building 150,064 sq.ft. transfered to west building 304,000 sq.ft. Floor Its Beds Efficiency 87 87 1 -Bed 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 2 -Bed 163 326 3 -Bed 149 30% 447 Total 49 53 14 492 10,954 sq.ft. Car Stalls 241 (3 car stal s wil be designe as 69 scooter stalls) 1 stall for f 0 resides, 1/2 stall for remaining residential units 50 + (1/2 *442t- 271 Interior q228 Exterior 50 Interior Academic 9,211 sq.ft Interior Recreation 16,215 sq.ft. Exterior 16,996 sq.ft 42,422 sq.ft Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" - " 4'-0" +/-) at Ca itol Street Rear 5'-0" - Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Fie with subordinate Forecourt Glazing between 2 and 10 Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Proposed 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedr Required U953s ft. per bedroom q.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt W11,796sq.ft. Forecourt W2 ,,356sq.ft. Courtyard W1 L2,275sq.ft. 660sq.ft. Courtyard W2 Courtyard W3 950 sq.ft.037 s .ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provided 25%(min) See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed at sending site) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Transfer 153,936 sq.ft. transfered to east building 150,064 sq.ft. transfered to west building 304,000 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 09 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 10 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 11 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 12 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 13 27,822 sq.ft. 27,822 sq.ft. 14 27,822 sq.ft. 10,954 sq.ft. 128,280 sq.ft. 150,064 sq.ft. Historic Preservation Height Transfer RITLAND KUIPER Tate Arms House landmark status = 34,800 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area 7,400 sq.ft. previously used 27,400 sq.ft. transfered to west building 34,800 sq.ft. Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 14 27,822 sq.ft. 16,868 sq.ft. 15 27,822 sq.ft. 10,532 sq.ft. 27,400 sq.ft Student Housing Requesting 0.62 floors or 17,290 sq.ft. of height bonus. Floor Floor Area Bonus Area 15 27,822 sq.ft. 17,290 sq.ft. ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 1*11L DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING SHEET SHEET NUMBER G001W H i Its"' • L L 0 f �S D� iL L L HARRISON ST. r�V 4 s 40 �' • * T - }XL j - J q • o T16 • F 4 • a i a • a • # 0C1r. I1�rk Q" 0 WEST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,468 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 33,190 SQ. FT. F F EAST BUILDINGS TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,328 LINEAR FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,340 SQ. FT. MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS WEST BUILDING 0 55 45' Q TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,574 LINEAR FT. (7.2% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 36,399 SQ. FT. (9.6% OVER MASTER PLAN) F i M 0 i w T� "! � moi• � F EAST BUILDING TOTAL PERIMETER LENGTH AT GRADE = 1,361 LINEAR FT. (2.5% OVER MASTER PLAN) TOTAL FOOTPRINT AREA AT GRADE = 29,108 SQ. FT. (1% UNDER MASTER PLAN) H • DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 • PROPOSED FOOTPRINT NARRATIVE THESE DIAGRAMS ILLUSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO, AND IMPROVES UPON, THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS SHOWN IN THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN. KEY A SOUTH DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PLAN DIAGRAM FROM PAGE 61 OF THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN WITH THE 12 EAST COURT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. B ENLARGED VIEW OF THE SOUTH DOWNTOWN DISTRICT PLAN DIAGRAM FROM PAGE 61 OF THE DOWNTOWN AND RIVERFRONT CROSSINGS MASTER PLAN WITH THE 12 EAST COURT SITE OUTLINED IN RED. C GRAY SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING THE SHAPE AND SIZE OF THE BUILDINGS IN THE MASTER PLAN. D GRAY SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING THE LOWER FLOORS 1-3 OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS. E DASHED OUTLINE OF THE UPPER FLOORS 4-15 OF THE EAST AND WEST BUILDINGS. F BOLD OUTLINE ILLUSTRATING THE LENGTH OF BUILDING FACADES THAT DIRECTLY FRONT CAPITOL STREET. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DECREASES THE LENGTH OF BUILDING FACADES THAT DIRECTLY FRONTS CAPITOL STREET AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. G. GREEN SHADED AREA ILLUSTRATING EXTERIOR COURTYARDS. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF EXTERIOR OPEN SPACE ALONG CAPITOL STREET AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. H RED DASHED LINE INDICATING THE SUN PATH ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE SITE. THE UPPER FLOORS AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS ARE PULLED BACK FROM CAPITOL STREET TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF DIRECT SUNLIGHT AT STREET LEVEL AS COMPARED TO THE MASTER PLAN FOOTPRINTS. ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COU ST #3 IOWA CITY,IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 V) Z 0 Z Z a W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SITE DIAGRAMMING SHEET NUMBER G002W EXTERIOR FURNITURE & TABLES - WITH CHAIRS (TYPICAL) SCREENING PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) STAIRWAY WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS (TYPICAL) FENCE (TYPICAL) BENCH (TYPICAL) TREE PLANTINGS WITH GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITY SPECIALTY PAVEMENT WILL BE DESIGNED TO COMPLIMENT BUILDING FACADE (TYPICAL) SCREENING PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) STAIRWAY WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS (TYPICAL) FENCE (TYPICAL) SEMI -PRIVATE QUIET COURTYARD - EXTERIOR FURNITURE & TABLES WITH CHAIRS (TYPICAL) FF BRICK PAVEMENT TYPICAL) SHADE TREES AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY I I I I BIKE RACK PARI IN� (5) RACKS (10) BIKES I I VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY FOUNDATION PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ORNAMENTAL TREE WITH GROUNDCOVER IN RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) PUBLIC COURTYARD • BENCH (TYPICAL) SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (TYPICAL) RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY (WIDTH 12'-4" TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ++ + ++ + + ++ ++ +++ ++ + ++ ++ ++ +++ + + + + ++ +++ + + + +�+ ++4 + +4 • i+ + + + •+ + f + +• •+ 1 + + + + +++++ + + + + + + + ++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . . . . . . . qtl_ +++ + + + + ++ VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ORNAMENTAL TREE WITH GROUNDCOVER IN RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) _ • • I• SHADE TREE (TYPICAL) - REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (TYPICAL) - REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES BRICK TO MATCH ADJACENT STREETSCAPE (TYPICAL) • SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES SHADE TREES WITH GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITY VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY • • • BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES BIKE RACK PARKING - (5) RACKS (10) BIKES • � I I I I I I I I I • BIKE RACK PARKING (5) RACKS (10) BIKES BRICK PAVEMENT TYPICAL) SHADE TREES AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY FOUNDATION PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY BIKE RACK PARKING � (3) RACKS (6) BIKES ORNAMENTAL TREE WITH GROUNDCOVER IN RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) ��� I ■ it I II I�� • • PUBLIC COURTYARD • BENCH (TYPICAL) DECORATIVE CONCRE (TY ICAL) I 1 1 11 U • INS VA W-MIMM SPECIALTY PAVEMENT (TYPICAL) BIKE RACK PARKING (3) RACKS (6) BIKES SHADE TREES WITH GROUNDCOVER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITY VINE PLANTINGS FOR PLANTING SCREEN (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE AND QUANTITY r I I I I I I I I I BIKE RACK PARKING (5) RACKS (10) BIKES I I BIKEIRACK PARKING (4) R, IKS (8) BIKES • RETAINING WALL (TYPICAL) LIMESTONE KNEE WALL TO SEPERATE DRIVEWAY LANE FROM CENTRAL PLAZA PRIVACY FENCE (TYPICAL) RAISED PLANTER 3' IN HEIGHT (TYPICAL) SEMI -PRIVATE QUIET COURTYARD EXTERIOR LOUNGE FURNITURE & TABLES WITH CHAIRS (TYPICAL) ORNAMENTAL TREES, SHRUBS &PERENNIALS FOR SCREENING IN RAISED PLANTER (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE &QUANTITIES -� SHADE TREE (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES ORNAMENTAL GRASSES (TYPICAL) REFER TO L002 FOR PLANT TYPE & QUANTITIES BRICK TO MATCH ADJACENT STREETSCAPE (TYPICAL) 1 1 1 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 04.22.2019 319.338.7878 DEE 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS DEE CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 12.06.2019 DEE 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 0 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHEET NUMBER L001 DATE DES 04.22.2019 DEE 07.19.2019 DEE 09.10.2019 DEE 10.21.2019 DEE 12.06.2019 DEE REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHEET NUMBER L001 - --------- CKF NST GBP CKF LTT i � 78 q 165 2 i i I II i PVC PVC uH OVH 6 6 2 L a 2 � PCS � J Ip I� PCS �r 3 32 2 _HBB N46L N L PVC � � HGH HPH H $H - PCS PC's 10 HFW ■ 23 2 HBB 2 �/ HRS HBB 2 GTI]I G I r ;V 3L4 ■ � VDC -I VMP CPD � —CC HVMP � SPD i VMP 1 137 45 SP 57 CER KC 4 VMP 3� 2 99 HRS]CLV � 21 165 - HBB NWL HPH HPH pEOs z 43 4 HBB HFW I HBB PVC CS 34 PVC 2 � 24 � GK 3 4 HPH HFW PCS 2 P 2S 10 N O� 5/HBB _ 32 PJS � PJS 6 PVC 1 L NW P3C 449 / PJS 449 3 « . � 451 _ '. «'+ .' F1 IisB JAS7B 12 17 4 IIIII� / f NWL NWL 19 19 + 493 +'+ « '+ +'+ +• PJS PVC OVH OVH P3C '°`sB � 4� 3 � I � PCS NWL - HBB PCS r/ j PCS PCS 32 30 HBB HPH !3CG VPCS 14 5 32 P3C 424 HBB TCG �NWL 1 14 12 � PC HGH H28HH. 12110 2 HFW \ 4 SP / VDC HBB SPD -- 15 2 36 I 36 � 14 CER VWGK VMP 2 131 GKC 2 102 HRSj CW - 21 AGP PCS I P 8 17 143 CII 61 1, SGS 4 20 CPD GT 4 C2H CLV r GTI 3 3 �—IV75P VDC 143 i � TCG 24 NWS VMP HBB HPH HGH 28 HRS 35 13� HPH 1 10 40 28 HBB 8 HGH 16 SPD SP HGH HFW / 11 PVC 2� � 2 �s � HFW —PCS PVC HPH HqB 32 PCS 32 HFW PVC LLLL 6 i Nyy� NWL 85 � 92 �I II GBA PHM PHM PHM COH PHM PHM J i �i i OH P 2M PM PH PH P $M G2A 2 12 18 18 3 12 12 I i L— i 0 10 20 PLANT SCHEDULE KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE 1.511 1.5" REMARKS SPACING QUANTITY AGP Acer griseum Paperbark Maple Caliper Varies 4 ASB Amelanchier x graniflora 'Autumn Brilliance' Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry Caliper Varies 22 CCH Crataegus crusgalli 'Inermis' Thornless Cockspur Hawthorn 1.5" Caliper Varies 3 CER Cercis canadensis Eastern Redbud 1.5" Caliper Varies 5 CKF Calama rostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerster' Convallaria majalis Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass Lily of the Valley #1 6" Cont. 18" 499 585 CLV Cont. 12" COH Celtis Occifentalis Common Hackberry 2" Caliper Varies 6 CPD Cornus alternifolia Pagoda Dogwood 1.5" Caliper Varies 7 GBA Ginkgo biloba 'Autumn Gold' Autumn Gold Ginkgo 2" Caliper Varies 4 GBP Ginkgo biloba 'Princeton Sentry' Princeton Sentry Ginkgo 2" Caliper Varies 3 GKC Gymnocladus dioicus'Espresso-JFS' Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree 2" Caliper Varies 8 GTI Gleditsia triacanthos inermis'Skyline' Skyline Honeylocust 2" Caliper Varies 8 HBB Hydrangea paniculata 'ILVOBO' Bobo Hydrangea #5 Cont. 48" 50 HFW Hosta sieboldiana 'Frances Williams' Frances Williams Hosta #1 Cont. 48" 26 124 HGH Hosta lancifolia Green Hosta #1 Cont. 24" HPH Hosta 'Patriot' Patriot Hosta #1 Cont. 24" 98 HRS Hemerocalli s 'Ruby Stella' Ruby Stella Daylily #1 Cont. 24" 82 LTT Liriodendron tulipera Tulip Tree 2" Caliper Varies 2 NST Nyssa Sylvatica 'David Odom' Afterburner Tupelo 2" Caliper Varies 4 NWL Nepata racemosa 'Walker's Low' Walker's Low Catmint #1 Cont. 24" 507 OVH Ostrya virgIniana Eastern Hop Hornbeam 2" Caliper Varies 6 PCS Panicum virgatum 'Cheyenne Sky' Cheyenne Sky Switchgrass #1 Cont. 24" 179 PFH Pennisetum alcopecuroides 'Hameln' Hameln Dwarf Fountain Grass #1 Cont. 24" 45 PHM Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' Heavy Metal Switchgrass #1 Cont. 24" 150 PJS Pachysandra Terminalis Japanese Spurge 6" Cont. 12" 2716 PVC Parthenocissus quinquefolia 'Troki' Red Wall Virginia Creeper #1 Cont. 36" 60 RAG Rhus aromatics "Gro -low" Gro -low Fragrant Sumac 24"-30" 5 Gal. 60" 8 SGS Symphoricarpos x doorenbossii 'Kolmgala' Galaxy Snowberry #5 Cont. 30" 34 SPD Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed #1 Cont. 18" 204 TCG Tradescantia x'Concord Grape' Concord Grape Spiderwort #1 Cont. 24" 56 VDC Viburnum opulus'Nanum' Dwarf European Cranberrybush #5 Cont. 30" 60 VMP Vinca minor jPeriwinkle 1 6" 1 Cont. 12" 785 ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Archttects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A 515.339.7800Ld WATERLOO, IA 50703 CONSULTANTS 319.233.8090 CIVIL ENGINEER DESCRIPTION AXIOM CONSULTANTS DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 E COURT ST DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.519.8220 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 19.6220 MEP ENGINEER MEP ENGINE AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 N Z O Z Z a Ld Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO.18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.19.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.10.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 @ NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLANS & SCHEDULE SHEET NUMBER L002 SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: A� PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. © PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. © PAINTED CROSSWALK OD PROPOSED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. �E PROPOSED STAIRS. �F PROPOSED BIKE PARKING. © STRUCTURED PARKING ACCESS. HD SEE SHEET L001 FOR DETAILS OF GREEN SPACE AREAS �I BUILDING COLUMN BUILDING OVERHEAD � ---' 1 ® j 0 0 U (G) CG) 0 U �K BUILDING FOUNDATION LINE i © ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION KUM & GO �� o T BURL LEGEND: 25 WESSTREET INGTON ((0 PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. / ® PROPOSED DECORATIVE POST LIGHT FIXTURE. CC°) # PROPOSED SITE AND AREA LIGHT FIXTURE. PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS DOORWAY U PROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS DOORWAY PRIVATE GREEN SPACE 316 SOUTH MADISON' v PUBLIC GREEN SPACE STREET n v I� W LI ' U NOTES: t' 1. REFER TO L001 FOR DETAILS ON LANDSCAPING, PAVERS AND c U PLANTINGS. C C❑) C❑)" 0 i W v 0 ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITY 324 SOUTH MADISON STREET v (SS) C C�� (W10) (ST) — E D OG1UH870H 97RE V 0 � � o a sr E) (� (WS) (W ) (W8) C W8) ®I C G) `D G) 3 C C06 C E) (E) ��!� (E) C❑) C�) sz� CD ) �P� C E) - YO' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET —(WI 2) —(W1 2) C W1 2) —(WI 2) —(WI 2) 0 ( W1 �) V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS C CHWS) CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 S) STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING C S) C S) (S) (S) .0 (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) (LPS) C CND) C CND) C CND) z CND) C CND) (f ND) CND)y C ( CND) C HPS) C HPS) HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HIPS) C ❑H) C ❑H C ❑H) C ❑H) ®H) C 11 H) --'/—E H) ® - C D+ r 0 � � o a sr E) (� (WS) (W ) (W8) C W8) ®I C G) `D G) 3 C C06 C E) (E) ��!� (E) C❑) C�) sz� CD ) �P� C E) - YO' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET — C LPS) C LPS) C S) C LPS) C LPS) C SPS) CND) ( CND) C CND) C CND) C CND; 60 EAST COURT STREET C� —(FO) C F❑) —(F (FO) C F❑ 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) WR) C CHWR) CHWR) CHWS) I C ❑H) < ❑H) ® C ❑H) C 11H)® °C ❑H�-- � ( ❑H) C ❑H) ❑H) — C W) C W) W) C W) C W) (W) (W) (W) C F❑) C F❑) C F❑) C FCS ( F❑) —(FM —(FO) C F❑) (W) C F❑) - C ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 14 B Iowa City, Iowa 52240 — C LPS) C LPS) C S) C LPS) C LPS) C SPS) CND) ( CND) C CND) C CND) C CND; 60 EAST COURT STREET C� —(FO) C F❑) —(F (FO) C F❑ 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) C W1 2) WR) C CHWR) CHWR) CHWS) I C ❑H) < ❑H) ® C ❑H) C 11H)® °C ❑H�-- � ( ❑H) C ❑H) ❑H) — C W) C W) W) C W) C W) (W) (W) (W) C F❑) C F❑) C F❑) C FCS ( F❑) —(FM —(FO) C F❑) (W) C F❑) - C ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U ) z 0z z Ld z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319)337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 OCT. 21, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 DEC. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C001 I., O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 140'-0" 5'-0" 135'-0" A2�1W I ! I COMPACT o88 087 COMPACT I I089 086 � DN I I A2090 � X649'-9" 085 A211W DN I 4 I 091 084 I I 092 IR 083 I I I 093 094 - - - 082 I 095 096 081 080 I I I 097 098 079 078 I 099 100 189 077 I o I 0 � 101 102 188 S 104 187 105 185 076 I I I I 186 I I I I � ®■ I I106 E 184 I _ I 4 � I 107 183 I I I I 108 109 182 181 I I UP � DN I COMPACT 110 111 COMPACT COMPACT 180 179 COMPACT G 113 I I COMPACT COMPACT COMPACTG S COMPACT kol 117 174 173 119 172 171 S G 170 I I I I114 115 176 175 I � I 116 I � I I I 118 I I lu I. I COMPACT 169 I I COM PACT 122 123 168 167 I I - G 125 I COM PAC PAC T 166 165 Aa _ A211 W I = I COMT 126 164 LO I I COMPAC PAC T E 127 163 I COM PAC 128 162 I COM PACT 131 132 159 133 129 130 161 160 I 158 I I I 134 157 156 I I = I 135 136 155 154 I o o I 137 138 153 152 I I 139 151 150 I ■ I I � 1 _ I 140 149 I I I 141 = 148 I I 646'-6" = I I 142 147 I a COMPACT 143 146 4 0 N COMPACT 144 145 C2 A211 W MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN M 1 1/16" = 1'-0" N O A2 A211 W 0 �K, A4 A211 W O A204*2 1I40LIT" I I I I I I I I I I I Q I I I l i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l i I I I I I II I I --------------------------------- I I I _ - - - - - •- - - S C2 C2 AkL A211 W A202W LOWER LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN h'F 1/16" = 1'-0" +203W N 0 KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT U RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A10OW A204*2 A202W FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN P% 1 1/16"=l' -O" " BASEMENT LEVEL PARKING - UPPER " O A4 1/16" = 1'-0" O WALL RACK BIKE _ PARKING DIAGRAM (sine view) 40" � � 60'• 48" TYPICAL BIKE RACK KEYPLAN 12" offset for handlebar clearance 7 LOOP WAVE BIKE RACK - 5 BIKE CAPACITY - POWDER COATED ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. �p Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction withal written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C2 SHEET NAME UPPER LLfVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A101W A204V#C2 O bo CC M O 2 3 4 O© O $ 140'-0" 135'-0" A201W 1W C2 C2 A ,AI THIRD Al 1/16" = 1'-0" C2 A202W LEVEL FLOOR PLAN C2 A211 W 203W A204*2 3) 5) (6 140'-0" A201 W C2 C2 A211 W C1+203W Kl A5 A221 W A4 A211 W N 0 P C2 C2 A211 W A202W " SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN " O A4 1/16" = 1'-0" O KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A102W A204V#C2 00 It M O O O© O80 105'-0" 5'-0" 40'-0" 15'-0" 40'-0" 5'-0" A201 W C2 C2 A211 W A2 A211 W O O A4 A211 W C 1 p203W D C2 C2 A211 W A202W FIFTH THRU FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN h 1/16" = 1'-0" N O A204*2 e0 14 M O O ®® O© O 105'-0" O C1+203W O ,DI C2 C2 A& A211 W A202W FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN M� 1/16" = 1'-0" N O KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE N H V W i v a z 0 U)z 0 z z a W Z DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A103W In NORTH ELEVATION OF WEST BUILDING C2 1116" = 1-0" NORTH PERSPECTIVE OF WEST BUILDING AMP LU � I I 31-8 20 21�-8 20 20 268 F D AY ( C Y F A EB ) A Y (F A EB )IFA-ADRB ) W 10 45 5 45 5 z �J14 140 5-1 0-J , ■ - - ■ �■ +eF■ - is on -i r n. ���''�• '}x � 4: 'fir. - -- i 0 REA = 3,0 55 SF FAL AREA = 12,215 SF OF WALL AREA NEST GRADE WEST = EL 659-6 GRADE AT CORNER = EL 659-6 KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD - Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 U 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 60 E COURT ST#3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319"519.6220 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST 43 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319"519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 N Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.091 PRVU DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A201W In UPPER FACADE GLA UPPER FLOOR FACA PERCENT OF GLAZI� Cz 5OU I H tLtVA I IUN LW VVtZS I BUILLMN( 1116 1-0 �y SOUTH PERSPECTIVE OF (NEST BUILDING Ir -; A -j I� i 1 p r. - tw AL� \ ��� � .. � �. i• �^� �� it G~ '4W 4f;• t V Ilk Af►l 1, .. .. • _� PERSPECTIVE OF ROOF AREAS ZS' KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD - Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 3: 319.338.7878 U 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 U Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7860 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 60 E COURT ST #3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 3: 319-519.6220 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT U RITLAND KUIPER 561 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST 43 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 N Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.091 PRVU DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A202W !WllIN=0M'71 �■[/l►�[/1WITA W11IN: I 1 i loll HWEI11l111"lli 11 IIIII ■■■■■■ or 1 111111 Illll■■���� ■ I SESSION EMEEME ■1III ■�■■■■ oil M I d MENNEN 01 SEEMED 11=11111111 MENNEN ■ 1 MENNEN _—�—� ■ I MENNEN NJ ■■■■r 110 MENNEN pi I N WEEMEM !in MENNEN Em M II 1 �Inlrr.e■� � � � �» I ■■I ■- �.— ■■I ! ■ li 11111111111011 �ll r' i•. �.✓•• Irl .�. I eye •^yy' A �_ ••�P .. ■■l !■wlrr owll■r ■■fir � i•� i � � i �" - i .-a � ,' y.: -. t o� �_ �'_-:;�_, • � � '_ � 1'•�'.'��j► \ �'.'• � r ,# - � � SIS - r � I,' � ply I � �r ■ .�3 - :' ' u Q fill Y � tt qfil J .A� x - r -va - - ,t i7 ..� IC�� 1{� f r'r j 11 � � ��. 'P' . •a�;y� r L r �W�• � ' T }fib iK �•f+r "� •� s�►..T. ��';" �.A A#&, 404 on ■L■S� f J I1' YA 0 0 P 44 0 0 ULU PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT � 3-4 �515151515 10 5 3-4 46-8 DRECOU RT ELEVATION OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.09.1 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without writh permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. 4 PRELIMINAR) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ANC RENDERINGS KEYPLAN SHEET NUMBER A203% MEE SEE 11111■■■ wim- i's 1[!l0go] M►►►1=.'1 1E:11111 IN ■I I soII !! ■■ I =NONE E 1! ■I ■_ MEEMIEW 11 1 I 11 11 Emmons II NEEMIN IIII I■ I IN ■1 MEMNON ■■■i■ !I■ ■ ■■ ■ � ■■■■■■ n ss� sss ss� Air .I s. sy s. sss� sss� sss. rss.1M- Mss. 11 1 omL �i� X11 ■ IN ■ 11 1 MEMNON ■! ■■■■■ �! ■ ■■ i ■ t1■11■ 11MMNNNEMIN �1 ■�■ ■■ �C■ I MEMNON !!_IIIII�IIIW ■■■■�■ IIIIIIIIII M WWMM _ 11111111 MEMNON IIIIIMAINEN MEMNON !i�illlllil ■■■■■■ 1IRMO no MEN! 11111111■■■■■ 5111111MEMEME :I ■ ■ 11,111EN 1■■■■■■ MMIN■■■■■■ 11' 11111111 MENNEN I I 11■111111�ml I ■■■ ■■ !!='-ImRMiMi .■ 111111"IIIIIIIIMEMNON 111111111:liffill'1111'== ■1 MEMNON IN IIIIIIIIII[.: ■■■1�! 111111111��!��e!!�MON Ili ■MMOMNEW■ I1■111111111111 ■_■■■■■ 1111II I ■I■■ ■■■:■■■I_ 111E1MM1EM1M oilED 11111mm �- � ----NOM-000 Elm NEW M MW .11 OPEN TO COURT lYf�l�■■■ IIIIIIIII_iA��STREETmill 11 PAS OUGH . - .-. 1A 1 1� WE - sq i 1 M film@" 1 1 111■■■■■■ II oil .■■■■E _____ 1! Emmons I ME1111111 MENEM■ ■�' IIIIIIIII ■i■■■■ ■� Liiii�iiiil 'r`�___ il 111111111111111 MENEM■ ■� 1!!91!!0 ■■■�!■ maNllila 11:1[11[1[[1 ENEENE Elm 10111 ■1■�■� 11.111[[ 11[[ ■ ■■■�■ ■l■ IIIIIIIII mm■■■■ 11111111111111 M NONE■ II IMEEMER 11_ MENEM■ I ■�� IIIIIIIII ■■■.■� 11m 11 1-1110101011111111 Nil M. MMMMMM Ell 0 0 r 12 EAST COURT s r I FIRST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE ' I SOUTH = EL 659-9 r .......... ..... .r...........R.......................................................................... some M.. ■■■ r ............. I GRADE AT CORNER = EL 656-3 e SARAGE ENTRY ---\, >- 50 10 50 60 I LU �LU z HU (fill i OWNER It I:� 1111; i..:. 100-500 LLC f . C 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111,1111 tjl!#I all IIS I' PROJECT NO. 18.094 uVl }L :q6°1 u ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION ' 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 rlN I-•' 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 _ .I...— 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 0 *Rim NIP l�' 1 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without writtf permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. - PRELIMINAR) ` NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ANC RENDERINGS J Wk ivlIc NORTH ELEVATION OF WEST BUILDING COURTYARD CAPITOL STREET f,,j SOUTH ELEVATION OF WEST BUILDING COURTYARD V 1 1116" = 1' 0" -ION ABOVE COURTYARD CONNECTION ABOVE COURTYARD Al TYPICAL COURTYARD PERSPECTIVE AD TYPICAL COURTYARD ENTRY PERSPECTIVE r01-2111 01-2„1 COR D 5 3" = V-0" NICE DETAIL [01-2111 METAL "CORNICE" TRIM METAL TUBE FRAME METAL PANEL COR C 5 3" = V-0" NICE DETAIL KEYPLAN IETAL "CORNICE" TRIM ETAL PANEL XTFRI(1R \A/01 I ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COU ST #3 IOWA CITY,IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 V) Z 0 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBE 5A205W B5 206 W01 SINGLE 5'-0" 3" 3" W04 SINGLE .,,_n., 1'-8" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" 3 1/2" 1/2" 3 1/2" 00 Oo DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 ,--3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 0 0 206 �f3 in in — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 O O 00 O O 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 O IOWA CITY, IA 52240 C5 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) � Z 206 _ 0 0 I I I I I I - o0 I I I I I I L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J W02 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 3'-4" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" 1/2" 3 1/2" 1/2" 3 1/2" 00 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 ,--3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 0 206 �f3 in CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 O 319.519.6220 00 O 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 O IOWA CITY, IA 52240 C5 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) � Z 206 _ 0 0 I I I I I I - a0 I I I I I I L- — — — — — — — — — — — — L — — — — — — — — — — — — -J W03 SIDE-BY-SIDE W05 SIDE-BY-SIDE .in,_n" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" blutI-by-Slut 5'-0" 5-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 1/2" 3 1/2" 1/2" 3 1/2" 3 1/2" 3" Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 ,--3 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 206 �f3 CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 319.519.6220 00 RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 O IOWA CITY, IA 52240 C5 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) � Z 206 _ 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J W07 GROUPED ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS A3 1/2" = 1'-0" TRIM DICAL DICAL STRUCTURAL FLOOR SPANDREL TRIM PANEL COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM D5 WINDOW SPANDREL DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM WINDOW MULLION TRIM DETAIL V %J 3„ = 1'-0" IDOW TRIM, D WINDOW, TRIM PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM TERRACOTTA PANEL EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM WINDOW JAMB TRIM DETAIL vv 3„ = 1'-0" KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 222 40 IA 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 5 IA 5 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A206W OVER ROOF 832'-8" O i 0 LEVEL 15 822'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 14 812'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 13 802'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 12 792'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 11 782'-8" 0 O LEVEL 10 772'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 09 762'-8" 0 O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O O LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O r LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" O O r LEVEL 04 712'-8" o0 LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O r LEVEL 02 691'-0" O ir) r LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" c7 LEVEL 01 C Eo 672'-8" SHAKE BAR 668'-0" CO N LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" O LEVEL B2 WEST 646'-6" O LEVEL B3 WEST 637'-6" BUILDING SECTION NS @ WEST BUILDING C2 1/16" = 1'-0" O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 T LEVEL 07 742-8" 0 0 LEVEL 06 732'-8" O 0 LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 00 T LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O LEVEL 02 691'-0" O in LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" 0 00 SHAKE BAR 668'-0" (O N r LEVEL B1 WEST LEVEL B2 WEST 646'-6" O LEVEL B3 WEST OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0'_ 5 6 7 ---------------------- BUILDING SECTION EW NORTH A2 1/16" = 1'-0" WEST BUILDING OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" — — — — _ O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O r LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 06 732'-8" O 0 LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 04 712'-8" o0 r ® ® T 6 O 8 -------------------- ---L---------------- L ----- BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" WEST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD LEVEL 03 Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 701'-0" O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 LEVEL 02 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 691'-0" CONSULTANTS 60 - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 IA 5 5 LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" N r WATERLOO, IA 50703 LEVEL B1 WEST 319.233.8090 655'-6" 0 NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 LEVEL B2 WEST ® ® T 6 O 8 -------------------- ---L---------------- L ----- BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" WEST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 52240 IA 5 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IOWA CITY, 222 IA 5 5 40 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A21 1 W LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" BURLINGI STREET SHAKE BAR 668'-0" A A. FRONTAG Al 1/8" = 1'-0" E SECTION a N LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" An FRONTAGE SECTION @ S hL 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 B 674'-4" SHAKE BAR 668'-0" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" FRONTAG A3 1/8" = 1'-0" E SECTION B NE LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" FRONTAG A41/8" = 1'-0" E SECTION B SE LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 TRACK 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" PARKING U RT TYPICAL FORECOURT ENTRY CANOPY V V 1/8" = 1'-0" 5'-0" 4'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" METAL SCREEN WALL METAL SCREEN W METAL ENTRANCE PORTAL METAL ENTRAN PORI DEWALK N CAPITOL FREET LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 666'-0" BIKE PARKING LEVEL B1 WEST 655'-6" TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY A5 1/8" = 1'-0" A6 1/8" = 1'-0" ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 IA 5 40 5 IOWA CITY, 222 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A221 W + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = + AD 0 0.0 0.0Fr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.4 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • • I o • I + + - + +• + + + + + + + - + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.9 1.9 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0. 4 10. 9. 1 2 0.�� 0.0 0.0 .. • 1771 .0 0. 0. .4 16.0 8.3 8.9 11.9 .5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ❑ a 40 0 0. .7 1 .5 9.6 9. 10.9 .3 4.0 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. « ).4 X6.4 5.6 5.4 6.2 5 ■ .6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0 2� .7 2.4 1.8 1.7 + ■ 1 + 2 + + 3.4 . 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + - ' + )) + + + + - + .0 2 1. 1.2 1 .5 1.5 0.6 0.6 1.6 Z1 4 .8 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 PRIVATE • GREEN ■ SPACE .0 + 2 1a .0 �i.2 + .6 2.8 0.9 0.8 2.0 + + .0 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 1.8 .8 5.1 7.9 8.6 7.8 + 0 6.7 +. + 0.0 + 0 0.0 » c )) .0 0.5 2.1 .8 9.4 8.9 8.8 9�5 + ■ 5. 1.8 0.0 + 0 0.0 0 .0 .3 1 + .0 .9 7.5 .3 8. 1 + .7 ❑ 8 .� 3 + 0.3 0 1 0.0 =z • W � .0 0.1 ❑3 .6 9.5 .0 8 9�5 4 1 2.� .8 ++ ! 5 0.1 Q ® v 13 . 0 0 0.6 � . 1 2 5 . �' C w) � < w) C w) +w) �) 5.� 5 .9 3.7 6.1 7. 4.2 1. 0.1 �w) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) (w) (w) (G) (G) (G) C ) C CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) • H + + CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) C ) + + « .0 0.4 1.6 .3 0 4 0.5 0.7 .B. 4 5 9 5.4 + 0.2 .0 0. +.9 .1 0 9 0. 0.5 .4 6 5 3 1 0.2 • M o 0 .1 0. 1.4 .3 6. .8 1.8 0. 0.5 +.2 3 5. + +° 0.1 3�3 0 o � o .1 0 2.0 PRIVATE GREEN .3 1.5 0 6 , . 0.5 .6 2 5. 2.1 0:5 .1 0 SPACE R .1 0. 1.3 2.4 a.7 .9 2.8 1.2 1.1 + 3. 2.6 D +1.4 , 6.0 8.6 8.4 2 0.8 6� ) 5.2 o .1 0.4 1.6 11.2 .4 7. 8.6 9 5.2 c » .1 C 0 96.8 T0AIA .5 8. 2® v �.3 ELI v v v • • 0 • .0 0. 2,❑ 203 .5 2.1 1.. 1 1.9 2.-6 2.5 0 + + • + +k + + + + + + + .0 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.5 .0..6 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.� 3.2 3.2 .4 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 E COURU 37G EEE • � 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 FOE0.3 .3 0.2 ❑H C ❑H) C ❑H) C H+ CDH) ( ❑H)❑H) C El H) El H) C ❑H) -- C ❑H) C C ❑H) H) C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) Cb+ ❑Ifi C ❑+ C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) °C ❑H►- < ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) 0 0C 0.0 0 0.1 0.1 0 0 1 + + + +❑ + + + + + +� + a0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL OUTDOOR LIGHT OUTPUT TAG QUANTITY LUMENS TOTAL LUMENS F-1 74 6,988 517,112 F-2 14 3,237 45,318 DESIGN TEAM TOTAL 562,430 LUMENS PER NET ACRE (3.4) 165 420 1 1 1 LIGHTING PLAN KEYNOTES: Q)) F-1: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: 121 -32L -700 -NW -G3-4 MOUNTING: WALL MOUNTED AT 15" F-2: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: PPT-140L-650-NW-G2-3-UNV MOUNTING: POLE MOUNTED AT 15' GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC 2017 AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. 2. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE LISTED BY A RECOGNIZED TEST LAB. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL AND CONNECT ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT FOR THIS WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. COORDINATE LIGHT FIXTURE PLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION WITH LANDSCAPE. 5. COORDINATE ELECTRICAL ROUTE WITH UTILITY COMPANY AND MEP. .--- 0)) F-1: WALL MOUNTED SCONCE LIGHT FIXTURE * F-2: DECORATIVE POST TOP LIGHT FIXTURE ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 IEEE 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN TEAM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 CIVIL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 z 0 U) Z 0Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 IDESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT 13, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. RECORD DRAWINGS This record drawing has been prepared, in part, based upon information furnished by others. While this information is believed to be reliable, the Architect assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of this record drawing or for any errors or omissions that may have been incorporated into it as a result of incorrect information provided to the Architect. Those relying on this record document are advised to obtain independent verification of its accuracy. SHEET NAME LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRICS PLAN SHEET NUMBER E001 VICINITY MAP N O KEY PLAN BURLINGTON STREET COURT STREET N O 12 EAST COURT IOWA CITY, IOWA EAST BUILDING INDEX OF DRAWINGS PRESENTATION G001E TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX G002E SITE DIAGRAMMING L001 E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN L001 E LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PLAN C001 E CIVIL PLAN A100E LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS A101E UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS Al 02E SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS Al 03E FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS Al 04E FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A202E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A203E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS A204E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS GS A206E ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS A221 BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS E001 E LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRIC PLAN CODE REVIEW General Information Residential Unit Count Efficiency U 4pds 2 07.29.2019 1 -Bed 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 2 -Bed 144 288 3 -Bed 125 °o).) 375 Total 26 820 Motor Vehicle Parking Count Required 1/4 per bedroom = Provided Car Stalls 208 (0 car stal s wil be deslgne as 60 scooter stalls) Bike Parking Count 1 stall for first 50 residen " its, 1/2 stall for remaining residential units Required 50 + (1/2 x 388)= 4 Provided Interior 4 Exterior 2 [246 Building Amenity Interior Academic 9,824 sq.ft Interior Recreation 0 sq.ft. Exterior 10,351 sq.ft 20,175 sq.ft Iowa City Zoning Code 14-2G-1 Subdistrict: South Downtown 14-2G-3 Setbacks: Required Provided Along Burlington Street 10'-0" 10'-0" Primary Street 2'-0" - 4'-0" +/- at Ca itol Street Rear 5'-0" - Height: Eight story maximum building height. See 14-2G-7 G for bonus provisions. Stepbacks: facade shall step back 30'-0"(min) above sidewalk to above the fifth floor Required Provided 10'-0" 10'-0" at Burlington and Court Street 10'-0" and 25-0" Capitol Street Parking Type: Underground 14-2G-4 Frontage Type: Urban Fle with subordinate Forecourt Glazing between 2 and 10 Required Provided 50%(min) See building elevations Ground floor finish floor elevation above abutting sidewalk (FBC may adjust requirement provided at least a portion is located within 12" of the abutting public sidewalk) Required Provided 2'-0" (max) 14-2G-5 Building Type: Mixed Use 14-2G-7 Open Space: 10 sq. ft. per bedrogeds Required .ft. per bedroom q.ft. required open space Provided Forecourt E1 1,796sq.ft. Forecourt E2 2,356sq.ft. Courtyar 2,219 sq.ft. Courtyar E2 3,961 sq.ft. 10,332 sq.ft. Window/door to wall ratio Required Provide 25%(min) See building elevations Building Height Bonus Provisions Public Right -of -Way Height Transfer Calculation 38,000 sq.ft (Total Capitol Street Area) x 8 (number of stories allowed) 304,000 sq.ft. Height Transfer Area Allowed Transfer gia Floor Floor Area Transfered Area 09 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 10 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 11 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 12 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 13 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 14 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. 153,936 sq.ft 153,936 sq.ft Student Housing Requesting 1 floor or 25,656 sq.ft. of height bonus. Floor Floor Area Bonus Area 15 25,656 sq.ft. 25,656 sq.ft. Minor Adjustment #2- The owner requests approval of a deviation from the facade continuity requirement set forth in 14-2G-3, "Subdistrict Standards." The proposed north facade has less than 75% continuity due to alley access to parking and service areas. ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE 2 V Q Z Z Q Ld Z DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX SHEET NUMBER G001 E SITE PLAN KEYNOTES: A� PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK. © PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT. © PAINTED CROSSWALK PROPOSED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL. PROPOSED STAIRS. �F PROPOSED BIKE PARKING. © STRUCTURED PARKING ACCESS. ;- HD SEE SHEET L001 FOR DETAILS OF GREEN SPACE AREAS �I BUILDING COLUMN BUILDING OVERHEAD U 0 U 0 W 00 w W I w V } W 5' $ETBCK - w ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITY 324 SOUTH MADISON STREET W w Q W E (S8) C S8) (�8) = =�= W1 0) (W1 0) W� - (W1 )( G) t y (ST) T) (W1 2) (W1 2) ( W1 2) (W1 2) (W1 2) O 0 (W1 2) ( CHWS) ( S) (S) (S) C S) S) S) (S) (S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) C LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) _ ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) Li - (HPS) C HPS) _ (HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) (HPS) (HPS) _ (❑H) (❑H (❑F+) (❑H) (9H) (11H) -�-❑H) ® (C3+ E O WHIH ON 97RE V f ^t r , G) ( G) o \ O I� � W ) C W8) (W8) (W8) C co I— I S CS) CS) (S) (S) (S) (S) CS) 3 � (G) C G) G) C G G) ( G) (G) WR) ( C E) E)� (E) ( E) ,❑ , L ��CD) C❑) R7J8 (❑) CD ) C❑) ( REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER TO ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALK EXTENSION 710' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET (SSS S 4 LLU -moo E '4F7777 60 EAST COURT STREET BENffmm C T) o� CID _ ° (Iwo I (F ) —(FED C F❑) C F❑) ( F11)E co v y 1 1 2) CHW S8) ) (S8) (S8) C S8C ) C S8) CCC(W�—(CHWR) WR) S (W1 2) (W CW1 2) (WI 2) 1W ) WCHWR) WR) HWR) HWR) HR CHR(HWR)(CH(CHWR) CHW) 2) C R) CCH ) CHWR) (CHWR) (C WR) (CHWR RCHWS(8) 8 (S8) (CHWS) S8)SS8) (S8) S(( - LPS) (LPS) o ( LPS(L S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( CND) ( CND) _ ( CND) C CND) (CN C CND) (CND) CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) L7 ®- ([1H)—�— (❑H) (DH) ( ❑H) C ❑H)� � ❑ ( [I H) (T] H) �� C ❑H) ( ❑H) ® (❑H) (11H)® °C ❑H— C ❑H) ([]H) ❑H) W) (W) (W) (W) (W) ( W) ( W) (W) (W) (W (F❑) C W) (F❑) C W) (F❑) (F11)(FCS C F❑) (F❑) C F❑) (FID(F❑) F( (W) CFO ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 U �K BUILDING FOUNDATION LINE V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 © ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 KUM & GO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER �1 o LEGEND: 25 T BURL WESSTREET INGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U ) ((0 PROPOSED WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE. 0z ® PROPOSED DECORATIVE POST LIGHT FIXTURE. C❑; - # PROPOSED SITE AND AREA LIGHT FIXTURE. Ld z PROPOSED PUBLIC ACCESS DOORWAY U PROPOSED PRIVATE ACCESS DOORWAY PRIVATE GREEN SPACE 316 SOUTH MADISON' STREET v PUBLIC GREEN SPACE n v EMM= - NOTES: W 1. REFER TO L001 FOR DETAILS ON LANDSCAPING, PAVERS AND c U PLANTINGS. ( C❑) c❑)w 0 W 00 w W I w V } W 5' $ETBCK - w ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITY 324 SOUTH MADISON STREET W w Q W E (S8) C S8) (�8) = =�= W1 0) (W1 0) W� - (W1 )( G) t y (ST) T) (W1 2) (W1 2) ( W1 2) (W1 2) (W1 2) O 0 (W1 2) ( CHWS) ( S) (S) (S) C S) S) S) (S) (S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) C LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) _ ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) ( CND) Li - (HPS) C HPS) _ (HPS) C HPS) C HPS) C HPS) (HPS) (HPS) _ (❑H) (❑H (❑F+) (❑H) (9H) (11H) -�-❑H) ® (C3+ E O WHIH ON 97RE V f ^t r , G) ( G) o \ O I� � W ) C W8) (W8) (W8) C co I— I S CS) CS) (S) (S) (S) (S) CS) 3 � (G) C G) G) C G G) ( G) (G) WR) ( C E) E)� (E) ( E) ,❑ , L ��CD) C❑) R7J8 (❑) CD ) C❑) ( REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER TO ACCOMMODATE SIDEWALK EXTENSION 710' SETBACK VOXMAN MUSIC BUILDING 301 SOUTH CLINTON STREET (SSS S 4 LLU -moo E '4F7777 60 EAST COURT STREET BENffmm C T) o� CID _ ° (Iwo I (F ) —(FED C F❑) C F❑) ( F11)E co v y 1 1 2) CHW S8) ) (S8) (S8) C S8C ) C S8) CCC(W�—(CHWR) WR) S (W1 2) (W CW1 2) (WI 2) 1W ) WCHWR) WR) HWR) HWR) HR CHR(HWR)(CH(CHWR) CHW) 2) C R) CCH ) CHWR) (CHWR) (C WR) (CHWR RCHWS(8) 8 (S8) (CHWS) S8)SS8) (S8) S(( - LPS) (LPS) o ( LPS(L S) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( LPS) ( CND) ( CND) _ ( CND) C CND) (CN C CND) (CND) CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) (CND) ( CND) C CND) ( CND) L7 ®- ([1H)—�— (❑H) (DH) ( ❑H) C ❑H)� � ❑ ( [I H) (T] H) �� C ❑H) ( ❑H) ® (❑H) (11H)® °C ❑H— C ❑H) ([]H) ❑H) W) (W) (W) (W) (W) ( W) ( W) (W) (W) (W (F❑) C W) (F❑) C W) (F❑) (F11)(FCS C F❑) (F❑) C F❑) (FID(F❑) F( (W) CFO ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 V Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER — AXIOM CONSULTANTS E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U ) z 0z z Ld z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319)337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 OCT. 21, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 DEC. 6, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C001 A2 A211 A4 A211 90 10 11 12 13 14 15 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 140'-0" C1 A211E A of MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN M 1 1/16" = 1'-0" N O C1 A211E 140'-0" LOWER LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN h't 1/16" = 1'-0" N KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE IDESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME LOWER LEVEL AND MID LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER Al OOE FUTURE ELEVATED PEDESTRIAN WALK ABOVE A203+C2 9Q 10 11 12, 13 14 15 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN N Al 1/16" = V-0" O BASEMENT LEVEL PARKING - UPPER h'P 1/16" = V-0" N O WALL RACK BIKE PARKING DIAGRAM (side view) rfr`cnt view) X40 �16�! � p i EI if � � � jfi" 1� � 12" offset for 4� k� handlebar clearance 48" 5 LOOP WAVE BIKE 7 BIKE CAPACITY ER COATED TYPICAL BIKE RACK KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME UPPER LEVEL PARKING AND FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A101E A203*C2 O 00 M A2 A211E 0 0 M 0 O O r O A5 r A2211 O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 9 10 11 12 (1 (4J 140'-0" 75'-5" 59'-7" A201E C2 C1 A211E F779ISF 2BD 781 SF 2BD A934 SF ■■ A2 A211E STAIR MECH 2BD 941 SF 113D 652 652 SF ELEV STAIR rM - MECHANICAL TERCE 46'-8" WITHLOUVERSOSED 2BD 650 SF (UTILITY ECH METERS) A203E :: C5 k7464 D SF 7SF3 CORRIDOR 3BD RECYCL 967 SF 2BD 763 SF A6 A221 O I I O O O C2 C1 A202E A211E A o4 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN M 1/16" = 1'-0" A203*C2 O O O O O " SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN " A4 1/16" =1'-0" KEYP LAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O hi Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME SECOND LEVEL AND THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER A102 E A203*C2 O 00 M 9O 10 1D 12 13 14 15 120'-0" C2AL C1 A211E A202E Aol FIFTH THRU FOURTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN P% 1 1/16" = 1'-0" N O A4 A211E O O C O A203*C2 O 50 M C2AL C1 A211E A202E A A FOURTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PW 1/16" = 1'-0" A4 A211E O O O O O N KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE U-) H V W H 2 V Q Z O N Z O f Z Z Q f Ld Z DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME FOURTH LEVEL AND FIFTH LEVEL FLOOR PLANS SHEET NUMBER Al 03E A203*C2 00 M x C2 C1 A211E A202E FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN J'%'t 1/16" = V-0" N O A4 A211E O O O O O KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Q W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 1021 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME FIFTEENTH LEVEL FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER Al 04E P OVE EpP BUIL GRA AVE FIREZ NOR CL G ■ vv—� L 12-J NORTH ELEVATION OF EAST BUILDING C2 1116" = T-0" _ s - `, r � I d PERSPECTIVE EAST BUILDING COURTYARD KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 1&094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION N H V W H 2 V Q Z O N Z O f Z Z a W Z 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Manson Inc. is prohibited - PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A201 E P SOUTH ELEVATION OF EAST BUILDING C2 1116" = V-0" n SOUTH PERSPECTIVE OF EAST BUILDING I t w I wpw Z 4 515151515-515151515151515 FA26-$ AY F DOE B ) ( C2o Y 25 45 I 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1515l, --21-8 20 31-8 F A E B F AY Y LU 15 45 10 I p w 140 54 o Z KEYPLAN =3,075SF SOUTH = EL 668 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 1&094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION N H V W H 2 V Q Z O N Z O f Z Z a W Z 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Manson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A202E P OVERLAY HEIGH- ......................... BUILDING STEPB, = EL 712-8 ......................... STOREFR GLAZING 68% OF VA FIRST FLOOR AB NORTH = EL 676 1N �sI9I 11MCi1;1011 AVERAGE GRADE BUILDING = EL 67 1-10- 368 1 1 C2WEST ELEVATION OF EAST BUILDING �+ 2 1116" = T-0" (NEST PERSPECTIVE OF EAST BUILDING 2 3-4 TYPICAL FORECOURT ELEVATION C5 1116" = V-0° KEYPLAN 3 ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 319.338.7878 U 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 IA 5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319-519-6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) z 0 PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 1&094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, dsclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Manson Inc. is prohibited - PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER A203E OVERL BUILC AVER; BUILDI ....e .......................... e............................... [..[uuu[.uu.........................................,.......... F1RST FLOOR ABOVE GRADE � SOUTH = EL 672-8 i �10 w IL w � �•, EAST ELEVATION - EAST C21116" = V-0" PERSPECTIVE OF ROOF AREAS 0 lJ J'I LlJV1 \ILV Y Y I I I I I yLL HEIGHT GUARDRAILS. TYPICAL 50 D I EAST )VE GRADE •...................................`.[i[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[.[[[.• I f - W 10 I p Lia ccz 10--1 0- PERSPECTIVE Ti � PICAL FRONTAGE FACADE I KEYPLAN 0 ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 >!_l,! C S n,, NORTH ELEVATION EAST BUILDING COURTYARD V 1 1116" = 1'-0' JNECTION ►VE COURTYARD CONNECTION ^O^",COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION EAST BUILDING COURTYARD C1 1/16"!= T-0• ►L f A A TYPICAL COURTYARD PERSPECTIVE P% I A,, TYPICAL COURTYARD ENTRY PERSPECTIVE Pill - �- x021 CORNICE DETAIL V J 3" = V-0„ U-2" .. CORNICE DETAIL V J 3" = V-0" KEYPLAN METAL "CORNICE" TRIM METAL TUBE FRAME METAL PANEL METAL "CORNICE" TRIM METAL PANEL EXTERIOR WALL ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST#3 5 IA 5 IOWA CITY, 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 Z Z Q Ld Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS SHEET NUMBER 1 A20SE W01 SINGLE 5'-0" 3" 3" W04 SINGLE 1'-8" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" 221 East College Street I Suite 303 C? Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 0 0 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS in in - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 0 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 0 0 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 i � M I I I I I I - 0? I I I I I I L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � W02 SIDE-BY-SIDE 10'-0" 3'-4" 3'-4" DESCRIPTION 3" 3" DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 C? Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 0 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS in CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 0 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 i � M I I I I a? I I I I I I L - - - - - - - - - - - -L- - - - - - - - - - - -J W03 SIDE-BY-SIDE W05 SIDE-BY-SIDE 30'-0" 6'-8" 1'-8" 5'-0" 3" 3" oivF--o I -oivF- 1 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 5'4" 1 W07 GROUPED ENLARGED WINDOW ELE A3 1,2" = 1'-0" VATIONS TRIM DICAL 'ICAL STRUCTURAL FLOOR SPANDREL TRIM PANEL COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM D5 WINDOW SPANDREL DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM WINDOW MULLION TRIM DETAIL C53" = 1'-0" IDOW TRIM, D WINDOW, TRIM PANEL AT HEAD OF WINDOW BELOW COMMERCIAL WINDOW SYSTEM METAL WINDOW TRIM TERRACOTTA PANEL EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEM WINDOW JAMB TRIM DETAIL 3" = 1'-0" KEYPLAN ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 319.338.7878 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O 2 Z Z Q f W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18,094 b&I1IL DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 ©NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME ENLARGED WINDOW ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A206E OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" ROOF 832'-8" O 0 LEVEL 15 822'-8" 0 O LEVEL 14 812'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 13 802'-8' 0 0 LEVEL 12 792'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 11 782'-8" O 0 LEVEL 10 772'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 09 762'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 08 752'-8" O O r LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" O O r LEVEL 04 712'-8" 00 B �G J K L M N O P Q BUILDING SECTION NS @ EAST BUILDING C1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 04 00 LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O LEVEL 02 691'-0" O iA LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" CV i zo LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 10 11 12 13 14 99 11 12 13 14 _OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BUILDING SECTION EW NORTH @ EAST BUILDING A2 1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 —82-2'-8- LEVEL 22'-8"LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722-8" 0 0 00 O O r ._01. LEVEL 01.5 678'-6" LOLEVEL 01 C 672'-8" V O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 641'-10" 197 BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" EAST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD LEVEL 03 Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 701' -0" O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 O DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 LEVEL 02 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 691'-0" CONSULTANTS BUF CIVIL ENGINEER STR (V LEVEL 01.5 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 678'-6" RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 LEVEL 01 A (V 676'-0" STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LEVEL 01 C NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 672'-8" O _ r (V r AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 LEVEL 131 EAST 319-519-6220 659'-10" O Z O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O Z LEVEL B3 EAST 641'-10" B �G J K L M N O P Q BUILDING SECTION NS @ EAST BUILDING C1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 822'-8" O O LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722'-8" 0 0 LEVEL 04 00 LEVEL 03 701'-0" O O LEVEL 02 691'-0" O iA LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" CV i zo LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 10 11 12 13 14 99 11 12 13 14 _OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0"_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OVERLAY HEIGHT RESTRICTION - 834'-0" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BUILDING SECTION EW NORTH @ EAST BUILDING A2 1/16" = V-0" O O LEVEL 15 —82-2'-8- LEVEL 22'-8"LEVEL 14 812'-8" O O LEVEL 13 802'-8" O O LEVEL 12 792'-8" O O LEVEL 11 782'-8" O O LEVEL 10 772'-8" O O LEVEL 09 762'-8" O O LEVEL 08 752'-8" O 0 LEVEL 07 742'-8" O O LEVEL 06 732'-8" O O LEVEL 05 722-8" 0 0 00 O O r ._01. LEVEL 01.5 678'-6" LOLEVEL 01 C 672'-8" V O LEVEL B2 EAST 650'-10" O LEVEL B3 EAST 641'-10" 197 BUILDING SECTION EW SOUTH A4 1/16" = 1'-0" EAST BUILDING ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z Ld Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. ENORELIMINARY T FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A21 1 E LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" BURLINGTON STREET LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" LEVEL 131 EAST 659'-10" FRONTAGE SECTION @ N Al1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01.5 678'-6" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL 131 EAST 659'-10" . S 9 9 I I I I COURT STREET AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 673'-0" FRONTAGE SECTION @ S A21/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" SIDEWALK ON CAPITOL STRE LEVEL 01 A 676'-0" AVERAGE GRADE ELEV. 673'-0" LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" FRONTAGE SECTION @ W A3 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" SIDEWALK OI CAPITOL STR AVERAGE ELEV. 673 LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL 131 EAST 659'-10" FRONTAGE SECTION @ W A4 1/8" = 1'-0" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" METAL SCREEN Wf METAL ENTRANCE PORTAL AVERAGI ELEV. 67 LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" LEVEL 01 C 672'-8" PARKING LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" I TY P I C61/8" = 1'-0" '9 ; 4'-0" TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY P%*J 1/8" = 1'-0" CAL FORECOURT ENTRY CANOPY MOPED PARKING LEVEL 04 712'-8" LEVEL 03 701'-0" LEVEL 02 691'-0" SCREEN WALL _ENTRANCE 1L :VEL 01 C 672'-8" LEVEL B1 EAST 659'-10" w� TYPICAL ENTRY CANOPY 1/8" = 1'-0" ARCHITECT OF RECORD DESCRIPTION Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 Ld CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEER - AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RITLAND KUIPER 501 SYCAMORE MEZZANINE A WATERLOO, IA 50703 319.233.8090 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER NNW ENGINEERING 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 E COURT ST #3 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 0 319-519-6220 U) Z O Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 EAST COURT OWNER 100-500 LLC 111 East Something Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.111.1111 PROJECT NO. 18.094 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION 04.22.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 01 07.29.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 09.06.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 10.21.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 04 12.03.2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 05 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NAME BUILDING FRONTAGE SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER A221E + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + = + AD 0 0.0 0.0Fr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.4 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • • I o • I + + - + +• + + + + + + + - + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0. 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 • .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.9 1.9 2.1 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0. 4 10. 9. 1 2 0.�� 0.0 0.0 .. • 1771 .0 0. 0. .4 16.0 8.3 8.9 11.9 .5 0.0 0.0 0.0 ❑ a 40 0 0. .7 1 .5 9.6 9. 10.9 .3 4.0 1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2. « ).4 X6.4 5.6 5.4 6.2 5 ■ .6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0 2� .7 2.4 1.8 1.7 + ■ 1 + 2 + + 3.4 . 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 + + + - ' + )) + + + + - + .0 2 1. 1.2 1 .5 1.5 0.6 0.6 1.6 Z1 4 .8 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 PRIVATE • GREEN ■ SPACE .0 + 2 1a .0 �i.2 + .6 2.8 0.9 0.8 2.0 + + .0 1. 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .0 1.8 .8 5.1 7.9 8.6 7.8 + 0 6.7 +. + 0.0 + 0 0.0 » c )) .0 0.5 2.1 .8 9.4 8.9 8.8 9�5 + ■ 5. 1.8 0.0 + 0 0.0 0 .0 .3 1 + .0 .9 7.5 .3 8. 1 + .7 ❑ 8 .� 3 + 0.3 0 1 0.0 =z • W � .0 0.1 ❑3 .6 9.5 .0 8 9�5 4 1 2.� .8 ++ ! 5 0.1 Q ® v 13 . 0 0 0.6 � . 1 2 5 . �' C w) � < w) C w) +w) �) 5.� 5 .9 3.7 6.1 7. 4.2 1. 0.1 �w) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) Cw) (w) (w) (G) (G) (G) C ) C CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) • H + + CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) CG) C ) + + « .0 0.4 1.6 .3 0 4 0.5 0.7 .B. 4 5 9 5.4 + 0.2 .0 0. +.9 .1 0 9 0. 0.5 .4 6 5 3 1 0.2 • M o 0 .1 0. 1.4 .3 6. .8 1.8 0. 0.5 +.2 3 5. + +° 0.1 3�3 0 o � o .1 0 2.0 PRIVATE GREEN .3 1.5 0 6 , . 0.5 .6 2 5. 2.1 0:5 .1 0 SPACE R .1 0. 1.3 2.4 a.7 .9 2.8 1.2 1.1 + 3. 2.6 D +1.4 , 6.0 8.6 8.4 2 0.8 6� ) 5.2 o .1 0.4 1.6 11.2 .4 7. 8.6 9 5.2 c » .1 C 0 96.8 T0AIA .5 8. 2® v �.3 ELI v v v • • 0 • .0 0. 2,❑ 203 .5 2.1 1.. 1 1.9 2.-6 2.5 0 + + • + +k + + + + + + + .0 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.5 .0..6 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.� 3.2 3.2 .4 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 E COURU 37G EEE • � 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 FOE0.3 .3 0.2 ❑H C ❑H) C ❑H) C H+ CDH) ( ❑H)❑H) C El H) El H) C ❑H) -- C ❑H) C C ❑H) H) C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) Cb+ ❑Ifi C ❑+ C ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) °C ❑H►- < ❑H) C ❑H) C ❑H) 0 0C 0.0 0 0.1 0.1 0 0 1 + + + +❑ + + + + + +� + a0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL OUTDOOR LIGHT OUTPUT TAG QUANTITY LUMENS TOTAL LUMENS F-1 74 6,988 517,112 F-2 14 3,237 45,318 DESIGN TEAM TOTAL 562,430 LUMENS PER NET ACRE (3.4) 165 420 1 1 1 LIGHTING PLAN KEYNOTES: Q)) F-1: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: 121 -32L -700 -NW -G3-4 MOUNTING: WALL MOUNTED AT 15" F-2: PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE MANUFACTURER: PHILIPS GARDCO MODEL #: PPT-140L-650-NW-G2-3-UNV MOUNTING: POLE MOUNTED AT 15' GENERAL NOTES: 1. THE ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC 2017 AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. 2. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, APPLIANCES AND LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE LISTED BY A RECOGNIZED TEST LAB. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH, INSTALL AND CONNECT ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT FOR THIS WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. COORDINATE LIGHT FIXTURE PLACEMENT AND INSTALLATION WITH LANDSCAPE. 5. COORDINATE ELECTRICAL ROUTE WITH UTILITY COMPANY AND MEP. .--- 0)) F-1: WALL MOUNTED SCONCE LIGHT FIXTURE * F-2: DECORATIVE POST TOP LIGHT FIXTURE ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street I Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 IEEE 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue I Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 DESIGN TEAM STRUCTURAL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 CIVIL ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 MEP ENGINEER Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.519.6220 z 0 U) Z 0Z Z W Z PROJECT NAME 12 E. COURT ST OWNER APARTMENTS DOWNTOWN 909 E. BURLINGTON IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 337-2265 PROJECT NO. 18-0003 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION JUNE 11, 2019 IDESIGN REVIEW JULY 30, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 02 SEPT 13, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW SUBMISSION 03 © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. RECORD DRAWINGS This record drawing has been prepared, in part, based upon information furnished by others. While this information is believed to be reliable, the Architect assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of this record drawing or for any errors or omissions that may have been incorporated into it as a result of incorrect information provided to the Architect. Those relying on this record document are advised to obtain independent verification of its accuracy. SHEET NAME LIGHTING AND PHOTOMETRICS PLAN SHEET NUMBER E001 12 EAST COURT (FORMER PENTACREST GARDEN APARTMENTS) Enforceable Security Plan Resubmittal September 2019 Form Based Development Worksheet Item G.8.b.(1) — Page 19 Ax,OMCONSULTANTS 60 E. COURT ST, IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 1319.519.6220 AXIOM PROJECT # 18-0003 AmOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY TABLE OF CONTENTS: I. PURPOSE... 1 II. FACILITY PROFILE... 1 FLOORPLANS... 2 III. SECURITY SYSTEMS... 3 LIGHTING STRATEGY... 3 CCTV... 4 ACCESS CONTROLS... 4 ALARMS... 5 ON-SITE MANAGEMENT AND SECURITY... 5-6 IV. INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS... 6 PHYSICAL SECURITY... 6 DATA COMMUNICATIONS... 6 V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES... 6 BUILDING MANAGEMENT... 6-7 TENANT and STAFF... 7 VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES... 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES... 8 VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES... 9-10 IX. SPECIAL EVENTS... 10 I. PURPOSE This Enforceable Security Plan establishes a schematic Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for building security controls, implementation of security monitoring, and management of the overall system. In addition to establishing the SOP, this revised plan is provided as part of the overall Design Review Documents requirements for the September 2019 resubmittal. It is the intent of document to detail how our plan meets the requirements as stated in the Form Based Development Worksheet - item G.8.b.(1) — page 19. Overall, we want to reserve the capability to evolve this system over the life of the project design so that it will better serve the residents who live here by maximizing available technologies and capabilities of available systems as they evolve. Smart phone technology will be key to the overall implementation of this plan and we plan to provide an agile, flexible, and trackable service. This will help eliminate unwanted access to the facility and better control over who has access and when, as well as giving them the ability to quickly report (and respond) to requests. Most importantly — we need the facility to remain functionally relevant for as long as possible and want to make the entire project as adaptable, safe, and usable for a variety of residents as much as we are able. While the intent of the facility is to be primarily students to start, we don't know that it will stay that way or how the facility will evolve over the life of the building. We intend for this building to have a 100 -year lifespan. II. FACILITY PROFILE The 12 East Court Street (12EC) site, formerly known as Pentacrest Garden Apartments, is composed of a 3.4 -acre lot with a proposed total building footprint in excess of one -million square feet. The site will have four (4) mixed-use buildings on it, that are connected North -to -South above the fifth floor at the primary step -back. An underground parking facility two levels deep sits underneath both the West and East set of buildings. All of the four buildings are fronted by forecourts that lead to the primary entry point/lobby of each building. All of the buildings except for the Northeast one have rear private courtyards as well. The overall site is split West -to -East by a central pedestrian concourse per the Master Plan. South Capitol street will run North-South through the site on a new 100'-0" city right-of-way that will be re -opened between Burlington and Court streets. All grade -level entry points are indicated in the diagram below. The pedestrian and bicycle corridor between the structures (Capitol Street) — while not part of the building security plan, is also developed to provide maximum benefit and safety to those walking and bicycling the block. The design basis for this block will be similar to that of the new Washington Street streetscape in Page 1 1 Iowa City between Clinton and Linn streets. Pedestrian refuges, pinch -downs, visual screening, and lighting improvements provide a corridor which is safely designed for residents both inside and outside. There are twenty-six (26) total at -grade building access points as well as eight (8) entry points below grade from the parking garage — 2 per level, per side. _ . FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A WEST SIDE .. FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A EAST SIDE Overview of the ground floor entry -points demarcated. Page 1 2 AT -GRADE The primary access points to the buildings are located in each of the four (4) forecourts on the Capitol street side. These access points enter into vestibules and subsequently into lobbies for each building (5, 10, 17, 22.) The stairwells located near each lobby area include emergency egress doors which exit into the private courtyards which can then access the alleyways via secured one-way gates (4, 6, 9, 11, 23.) In the case of the NE tower, the egress door simply exits out onto the rear at -grade sidewalk on the East side of the building (19.) Commercial units and amenity areas are accessed at the multiple location points — some of these will be exit -only configurations (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26.) UNDERGROUND There are two garage access points located in public alleyways that lead to the underground parking structures. The West garage is accessed at the SW corner of the SW building (12) and the East garage is accessed near the East mid -point in the East alley (20.) The garage accesses will be double 10'-0" vehicle doors with an adjacent person -door. Within the garages there are secured access points into the North -most and South -most stairwells where building entrants can enter the building via the elevators or stairways. The NE stairwell and elevator will also access the proposed rooftop restaurant. III. SECURITY SYSTEMS 12EC will provide a robust security system to help establish safer and more secure living quarters and commercial spaces for all tenants. Our design team will accomplish this with a proactive rather than a reactive approach. Our design approach has been to create an environment that is tailored towards safety and an incredible living and learning environment. To accomplish this we have provided: ■ High quality lighting plans ■ Closed-circuit television systems ■ Intuitive, adaptable, and modern access controls ■ Adaptive alarm systems ■ 24-7 on site security and maintenance ■ Collaboration with University of Iowa and City personnel Lighting Strategy (DR300) Exterior lighting has been strategically placed to highlight the perimeter of the towers including building access points, private courtyards, forecourts, the primary pedestrian concourse, and even the rear public alleyways. The lighting plan will provide sufficient foot candles (FC) as required by the IECC and local codes - allowing for clear visibility throughout the site — without spilling beyond the perimeter into neighboring lots and streets. The exterior lights will be white -hue LEDs with an appropriate temperature Page 1 3 selection, that will operate via photocell activation (dawn -to -dusk.) These will act as a deterrent/security feature while providing adequate lighting for excellent video capture. Interior lighting will be arranged and designed with the same scrutiny as exterior lighting to create a well - lit, safe environment indoors. This will include common areas, shared hallways, lobbies, utility areas, amenity spaces, and underground parking facilities. These areas will provide 24/7 lighting to ensure proper monitoring via closed circuit television systems and keep areas of public traffic visible. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV] 12EC will be monitored 24/7 by CCTV cameras throughout the facility. This will include entry doors, vestibules, lobbies, amenity spaces, parking garages (360 -degree 2MP), common hallways (180 -degree 2MP)), forecourts, courtyards and controlled gate access points. Every exacgl/ision ingress and egress point to the building will be covered by video (single -point 3MP cameras.) Public areas will also be monitored along the building frontage with 1800 cameras that are able to view the central concourse, forecourts, courtyards, and commercial frontages. At this time we intent to use the ExacgVision system, Z -series Hybrid & IP Network Video Recorders or something equivalent. Exacq provides a large -capacity storage recorder which works in tandem with cloud -based uploading to allow for users to view footage anywhere using proprietary viewing software. It also includes a mobile app to allow for easy monitoring and data retrieval. The feed will be a continuous loop which will be viewable at the main security office as well as at each security kiosk. Security staff on site will have full time access to the live -feed video and will be able to monitor the video feeds 24/7. The combination of our conscientiously designed floor plans and strategical placement of cameras will create a complete coverage of the site and building. Electronic Access Control Electronic access controls will be provided via proximity pads throughout the site. All exterior access points for residential areas will be provided with this entry system. Residential occupants throughout the facility will be able to access the building through the four primary vestibule 1H35/90 SERIES locations in the forecourts. These locations will be locked and security -controlled HiH padded uildF.Mure/Many user 24-7 with only authorized residents having access privileges. The NE entry point _l 1, 0 will be a public entry point during normal operating hours as well as determined G . restaurant operating hours in the early evening. Outside of operating hours this ILLL P E n location will be locked and secured in the same fashion as the other three L ` forecourt locations. Page 1 4 The courtyard access points will be egress only and may not re-entered upon exit. Garage access points will be controlled via garage -door -openers, mobile apps, or access codes given only to residents and interior garage doors will be accessible via access panel the same as the forecourt entry points. Access points will be accessible via electronic security panels controlled by key -fobs, reader cards, smart phones or both. Door King high-rise systems are a similar system that has been used in the past and could be utilized on this project although priority may be given to something that is more smart -phone integrated and discourages the possibility of memorizing codes, or giving access out to non-residents. Door King's (DK) 1835/90 Series High Rise Building Telephone Entry/Access Control System (shown in Figure 2) provides digital access control devices such as keycard and fob readers to provide multi-user access into common spaces. There will be door -prop alarms at all building locations outside of the NE primary location and commercial unit entries. This fob and mobile app access system will be implemented on all Parking Garage and Level 1 entry points as detailed above. Residents' guests wishing to enter the facility shall only be able to enter by receiving access from a resident who is in proximity of the building either from a local access point (panel/pad) or via a smartphone app. Individual residential units will also be access controlled with only that units residents being able to access it. Adjustments to units based on move-in/move-out, expired leases, etc... will be able to be quickly and efficiently controlled by the building management of 12EC. Tight controls will be maintained for accessory areas such as the wellness facility, pool, study areas, and skywalk. Access to these areas will be restricted. Alarms Commercial tenants shall be responsible for providing and maintaining their own alarm systems. Primary and secondary entry doors to all residential areas at and below grade shall have alarm systems on them in case of forced entry. This alarm system shall ring to the 24-7 primary office/desk location as well as security kiosks in each building. These systems will ring to security who will then make a final determination whether to escalate the call to the authorities. These entry points will also include an extended -open alarm to prevent stuck doors or instances where tenants prop open doors and inadvertently leave them unattended. These systems will be triggered to alarm internally to the help desks after an extended period so that building security can respond. Individual residential units shall not have alarms but may install them upon management approval. On -Site 24/7 Management and Security Personnel The primary security, management, and maintenance office will be located on Level 1 in the Northeast building. This location will be professionally managed and staffed 24-7. This location shall have primarily Page 1 5 surveillance, entry, and alarm access to all areas of the entire facility with remote access to all of the security/management kiosks inside of the other three buildings. All locations shall be able to communicate with one another via an intercom system. IV. INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS Numerous security safeguards protecting information and technology systems will be present at 12 EC. Based on the type of occupancy, quantity of units, and scale of the building, the follow features are to be provided: Physical Security • All network server and IT equipment shall be in a locked and secured room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have fire extinguishers located within the room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have smoke detectors installed in room. • The network server and IT rooms shall operate on an uninterruptible power supply (UPS). • No food or beverages are to be allowed inside or around network server & IT rooms or enclosures. • When leaving and closing out secured areas, ensure all sensitive and confidential information is properly stored and not left in the open. Data Communications Security A firewall and security services shall be implemented for the communication between the 12EC public internet access and the general public and business patrons. Future innovations may allow for offsite integration of a number of these features. V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Building Management Responsibilities The main responsibility of the Building Management is to implement the provided security systems, properly utilize and monitor CCTV cameras, provide maintenance and upkeep of security systems, maintain a safer space for occupants, report incidents to local authorities where applicable, and record video for all monitored locations. To exercise the full capabilities of the surveillance and security systems implemented, a central on-site management/security desk will be staffed 24/7 and equipped with monitors tied into the CCTV cameras, providing continuous loop for surveillance of the site as well as the previously described building areas. Fob and mobile access will be periodically checked and managed. Necessary firmware and software updates will be provided to ensure the system is fully functionable and reliable. To help create a safe environment for building occupants, the management and security desk will be available to tenants 24/7. Page 1 6 Appropriate personnel will be sufficiently trained to use the video system per the final plan and design once the building is completed. Security personnel on site will be trained to manage the building but staff will only be as good as a call to ICPD. On site security will not be armed or trained to respond to active threats but will respond as quickly as possible to those events with calls to ICPD and direction to personnel who arrive as well as assistance with access to the areas in question. Tenant and Staff Responsibilities All leased tenants shall be required by their lease -contract to act in a responsible fashion with regard to their fellow building residents. Tenants, both residential and commercial, are expected to not prop doors open to prevent unauthorized personnel form entering the building. Residents are also expected to not allow anyone into the building that is not a guest and does not have individual access. Building occupants will be expected to report any incidents involving criminal activity to the building security and management desk. Emergency situations that involve a potential threat to human safety should be reported immediately by residents to the ICPD prior to notifying building management and security. VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES The main goal of 12 EC's security plan is to provide a proactive approach to public safety to prevent criminal activity from occurring instead of simply reacting to incidents that may transpire. This is accomplished not only by trying to identify smart integration of modern security systems but also by way of smart design and integration. Our project includes a number of well designed and integrated features to achieve these goals: ■ Smart layouts of floorplans with good sight lines and lighting levels ■ A well -constituted exterior lighting plan providing high quality LED lighting to vital exterior areas as well as lesser considered areas like the heavily -trafficked public alleyways behind the buildings. ■ Residential unit access controls tailored to individual residents and easily altered/adjusted by management. ■ Residential unit door design with solid -core frames in a swing -out configuration so that doors to residential units would be very difficult to break into compared to more typical apartment design. ■ Integration with City and University personnel to allow for review of final design and security considerations in order to provide good dissemination of information and a provision of lessons learned. Page 1 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES As part of this security plan, local emergency response personnel were contacted to determine expected emergency response times. While not every entity was able to provide such times due to too many unknown variables, a number of information pieces were provided. With 12EC's central downtown location, the site is located within minutes of nearly every available emergency service. Iowa City's Fire Department (ICFD) is within an estimated four -minute response area. Once on-site, the ICFD has access to all sides of the site via primary streets and alleyways. The closest fire station to 12EC is ICFD First Station 1 Headquarters which is located at 20 South Gilbert Street. ICPD is located at the same location as ICFD and can generally respond quickly to this location. While specific response times can not be given due to a variety of factors, expectations are for generally quick and responsive requests for assistance. In addition, this security plan will be reviewed and coordinated with ICPD prior to full acceptance and implementation. University of Iowa Campus Security services are also located close to site — only 1 block away — directly adjacent to the North. ICPD will be given access to video and security data for issues of safety directly related to the building that would cause direct harm to the occupants or the building. The Owner intends to work with the ICPD as necessary to maintain a safe and secure environment and allow ICPD access to reasonable amounts of information per their ongoing requests. In much the same way that the dormitories work with calls from RA staff (or general residents) to public safety to events/active threats — the intent at our building will be for security staff (or residents) to call ICPD to respond to these events quickly and effectively. Emergency medical services (EMS) have reported to have a response time of under five -minutes in urban areas which include downtown Iowa City. To aid in the response procedure of EMS responses, personnel will have access to all sides of the site as well. The closet EMS service station is Johnson County Ambulance Services which is located on 808 South Dubuque Street. A University of Iowa Quick Care clinic is located only 2 blocks from the site on Clinton Street. Page 1 8 sit PR 1.. 1 , IOWA AVELn +� I I'. z J Jrll WASHINGTON ST Lr � COLLEGE STI B RLING ON ST 3 C URT 5 (f' / � ' HARRI ON ST UJ J � � z ) R 5 1 E LEGEND ® rRo,Err�ocanrn Y Ll1 vrvc snr x wa �. rVRIICSnFm lu I11K. []JIIf.ICARf 1 .F - TION 7 -� * l�HNSON COIINIf RMRIIIJNCE EMERGENCY SERVICES LOCATION MAP J M PRENTISS ST -7 WRIGH I I � LAFAY TTE ST * L j BENTO ST IOWA CITY, IA VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES To ensure security systems are working as intended, periodic testing of systems and equipment will be performed. Staff or security will perform periodic walk-throughs of the site to ensure proper function of access points, gate latching systems, and camera mounts. When staff confirms doors are able to latch properly, they will then assess the electronic access control at each building entry to check that doors are locked when closed, that they respond to the access fob, and that the door unlocks appropriately. While checking entry points, 12EC's surveillance systems will be analyzed to verify no objects are obstructing the view of the cameras. Staff or security will also verify the cameras are capable of overseeing the entire area intended to be monitored by said device and adjust accordingly. If an item is rendered inoperable, it Page 1 9 shall be addressed in a reasonable amount of time. Broken equipment shall be noted and repaired as necessary. The type of system 12EC will implement will provide complete and ongoing feedback loops as to the functioning of the system. All camera function will be available in real time and malfunctioning or broken cameras will be able to be identified immediately. Owner intends to keep the system operational and functional with ongoing minute by minute capability to verify alarm operation, video operation, and failsafes to ensure systemwide functionality. This system is designed to maximize capability without draining WiFi. Ongoing maintenance logs are not as necessary with a live -response system like this but annual inspections and maintenance run-throughs will be performed on the system per the requirements and recommendations of the manufacturer. Freeman Lock and Alarm/ATEC, who will install and maintain this system for the Owner has confirmed this is the typical protocol for these newer systems and they will be in charge of maintaining them at all times. Tenants shall also be responsible for reporting any observed defects in security access systems that affect building access points and tenant dwelling spaces. In the event a tenant requires maintenance involving their unit's access control, the tenant shall submit an emergency maintenance request to building management to resolve the issue. The Owner would like to be adaptable to issues and would like to work with the City and ICPD to change building protocols as time goes on and processes and amended towards Iowa City's larger buildings. "How does this building compare to other buildings?" will be critical and the Owner would like to keep security protocols at similar levels. Annual checks of systems should be a part of the annual check of ALL systems (e.g. fire alarms) and part of the overall annual building permit process. IX. SPECIAL EVENTS The primary special event expected at the 12EC facility will be move-in/move-out events. These events will primarily take place in the late May/early June and early August timeframes and, to a lesser degree, in mid December. Because of the large amount of residential units, all move-in/move-out events will be coordinated with the City to facilitate any allowed street closures and to apply for the required permits. In addition, emergency personnel will be notified that such events will be taking place in order to coordinate as necessary. It may be necessary during these times to temporarily adjust the security systems described herein for short periods of time. An additional security person patrolling at periodic high volume times such as these would be a possibility if requested by ICPD. The Owner would like to work with ICPD to determine what these times will be and will address and reformulate these processes based on the future and final design of the building. Page 1 10 Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 12 of 29 Parsons moved the Commission approve ZCA19-06 an application submitted by Phil O'Brien requesting an amendment to the zoning code to allow animal related commercial uses in the Commercial Highway (CH -1) zone to allow for the development of a community based indoor dog park and recreation center at 2513 North Dodge Street. Signs seconded the motion. Hensch stated he thinks it's overly prescriptive, but he really wants this to pass, so maybe that is a conversation for a future date to address the 400 -foot separation from residential. He will not argue about that today as he likes this and hopes it's wildly successful and will support it. Signs noted he is excited to see potentially see something going in on that piece of property, it will really help that corner and it's a difficult spot. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CASE NO. DRC19-04: Applicant: Rob Decker, Axiom Consultants Location: 12 E. Court Street An application submitted by Rob Decker requesting a Level II design review, which includes a 7 - story bonus height request, for two, 15 -story buildings located at 12 E. Court Street. Russett began the staff report showing an aerial map showing the location of the project site Just south of Burlington, in between Clinton Street to the east and Madison Street to the west. As an overview of this application, again it is a Level II height bonus request, which requires review by the staff Form -Based Code Committee and Planning and Zoning Commission in this case, which is not typical, these typically go from the Form -Based Code Committee straight to City Council, but in this instance, it must be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Form -Based Code Committee includes Russett, Danielle Stitzman, development services coordinator and Tim Hennes, senior building inspector, and they have reviewed this plan and are also here tonight to answer questions. They determined that the project meets the standards of the zoning code. The height bonus request is a discretionary process and there's specific criteria that must be met and can help and guide decision making. Although the project meets the letter of the Code staff does have some concerns with the project, one being the proposed skywalk, the second being fully screened balconies, and the third is the design of the Capitol Street right- of-way which Russett will elaborate on later in the presentation. Some history on the project, this property was rezoned to Riverfront Crossings South Downtown in September 2018. There were several conditions associated with this rezoning and Russett wants to highlight a couple of them. First is the dedication of the Capitol Street right-of-way and second is that if a Level II Design Review was required for a bonus height request that it must come back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for a recommendation to City Council. An overview of the bonus height request, the applicant has requested seven stories of bonus height for two 15 story mixed-use buildings. The bonus maximum height in this zone is 15 stories Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 13 of 29 subject to a discretionary review. The applicant has requested bonus height through three different means, the first is the transfer of public right-of-way, the second is the historic preservation height transfer, and the third is for student housing. Russett showed the site plan. Capitol Street runs between the two buildings, there is a west building and east building. She began with an overview of the west building. It is proposed to have 492 dwelling units. There are three levels of underground parking. The non-residential uses would be along Capitol Street, Court Street and Burlington Street. Russett showed an image of the proposed elevation from Capitol Street looking west, and a couple of renderings that show some of the courtyard spaces. Next, she showed a map of the first level floor plan. The blue areas are residential uses, the green areas are amenity spaces and recreational spaces, the orange areas are office and then the yellow is retail. There are some residential uses that front the courtyard on the first level, the amenity space is the study areas along Capitol Street and then there's some recreational and amenities along Burlington Street. There is retail proposed at the northeast corner of Capitol Street and Burlington and also at the southern end along Court Street and Capitol Street. The proposed office space is on the Court Street side. The academic spaces are to include study rooms and computer labs with Wi Fi and the recreational amenities include a half basketball court, track, jacuzzi area and an outdoor pool deck. In the image that shows the proposed open space the blue areas are the publicly accessible open space and the green areas are privately accessible open space. For the west building around 9,500 square feet of open space is required and the plans show just over 15,000 square feet. Moving on to the east building, it has 426 dwelling units proposed, three levels of underground parking. Again, the non-residential uses are along Capitol Street, Court Street and Burlington Street. Russett showed the first level floor plan for the east building. Again, the orange area is offices, the green areas are study spaces and amenity spaces, and then there's a small portion of retail at the corner of Capitol and Court Streets. There are no recreational uses proposed in the east building, there is a restaurant that's proposed on the 15th floor. The required open spaces for the east building 8,200 square feet and the plans show around 10,300 square feet of open space. In terms of proposed material, the applicant has proposed to use metal panels, terracotta spandrel and regular glass, metal screens and concrete. Russett brought down the sample board the applicant provided for the Commission to take a look at. Russett also noted that along the first floor of Capitol Street, the applicant has proposed an artistic component in the form of a graphic panel behind metal screens near building entrances. She showed a rendering illustrating the metal screen with plantings growing up them and then the lighted graphic panels in the back. The applicant also proposed a skywalk which connects the two buildings at the fourth floor. The proposed Capitol Street right-of-way shows 12 1/2 foot unobstructed walkways, 12 1/2 foot travel lanes and angled parking. Next Russett explained the criteria for each height bonus request. First, the public right-of-way transfer. The criterion related to the public right-of-way transfer is that the land proposed for dedication, which could be called the sending site, is needed in order to construct or improve rights-of-way necessary to realize the vision of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. The applicant has agreed to dedicate the public right-of-way to extend Capitol Street, that was a Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 14 of 29 condition of the rezoning and this extension is envisioned in the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. The applicant has requested to transfer 304,000 square feet of right-of-way to the buildings. Staff does have concerns with the design of the Capitol Street right-of-way. First, staff recommends that the angled parking be changed to parallel parking. Although there are no bicycle facilities proposed along Capitol Street it will be used by cyclists and angled parking is not the best type of parking to have with cyclists. In addition, the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan shows parallel parking in this location. Additionally, the travel lanes proposed are 12 '/2 feet wide, which are wider than would be supported by the City and do not align with current City designs like the recent reconstruction of Washington Street. The sidewalks on Washington Street are also wider than the proposed 12 '/2 feet along Capitol and staff anticipate this to be highly traveled corridor especially by pedestrians. In terms of the proposed skywalk, staff concerns are that the skywalk could block the views of the Old Capitol and could potentially divert street level activity. Next is the historic preservation transfer. The criterion related to this transfer request is that the site from which the height transfers requested, the sending site, is designated as an Iowa City landmark. The Tate Arms is designated as an Iowa City historic landmark, this was designated several years ago by the applicant. The applicant previously transferred a portion of the development potential of the Tate Arms to an adjacent property and agreed to a rehabilitation plan as part of that. The current request is to transfer the remaining potential of the Tate Arms building, which is 27,400 square feet to 12 East Court. Next is the student housing bonus height request. There are two sets of criteria for this request, first is the locational criteria. The project must be located within the University, South Downtown or West Riverfront Subdistrict and be located within 1,000 feet walking distance from the University of Iowa campus. Russet confirmed the proposed project meets both of those criteria. The next set of criteria are related to management design and amenities. This includes an enforcement plan for professional 24-hour on-site management and security. Open space must be provided within amenities that create a high-quality living environment for students and secure bicycle parking. Russett reiterated this project meets the location criteria, it also demonstrates compliance with the number of on-site bicycle parking that's required. Staff would recommend transparent fencing around the bike parking within the parking garages for safety reasons. Mentioned in the staff report, the City has reviewed the security plan however more detail is needed. Staff recommends that a final administrative review and approval of the management plan take place at a later date so staff can confirm various things such as confirmation of camera coverage, protocols for police department accessing videos, protocols for timely repairs as well as staffing requirements. Russett noted the plan lacks detail on how the student amenity spaces creates a high-quality living environment. Therefore staff is recommending some additional justification on those student amenity spaces to ensure that they are the right type, the right size and right amount based on the size of the building. Lastly, the applicant has proposed fully screened balconies, staff recognize that the screening is provided for safety reasons but have concerns that the screening could take away from the quality of the design. Russett stated there are several rezoning conditions that had to be reviewed as part of the development plan. The first condition is that the property must substantially conform to the building footprint shown in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Russett showed an image comparing the Master Plan and the proposed building. The applicant's plans Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 15 of 29 show 5% more linear feet along exterior walls and 4.8% more square feet than the Master Plan. but staff feels that this condition has been met. Russett pointed out the Master Plan originally is showing four buildings and the proposed project is two buildings. The next condition is that the development of the subject property must include a landscaped interior courtyard between the two easternmost buildings. Russet acknowledged the plans show an interior courtyard extending from Capitol Street to the alley between the east building and the Voxman Music Building, so this condition has been met. The last condition is the bonus height shall demonstrate excellence and building and site design, use high quality building materials and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. This is not only a condition but also a standard within the Form -Based Code to review the height bonus, Russett mentioned the materials earlier but noted there are extensive window and door openings that show that the project meets the fenestration requirements of the Code. All entrances to non-residential uses along Burlington, Court and Capitol Streets are at grade, helping to create a more walkable environment. The step backs meet the 10 foot at the fifth story, and there's even deeper step backs closer to Court Street, and they narrow as you move north toward Burlington along Capitol Street. The proposed project is located between the Voxman Music Building on the east and an eight story residential project on the west and the Johnson County Courthouse to the south. The role of the Commission here is to review and make a recommendation to City Council on the proposed development. The Commission should use the criteria that staff has outlined here that the Form -Based Code Committee used. City Council will be using that same criteria. In terms of next steps, after the Commission makes a recommendation and the plans will be reviewed by City Council and the awarding of the bonus height is up to City Council. Russett stated the Form -Based Code Committee finds that the proposal meets the standards of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. Staff does recommend the following modifications and some additional details. 1. Removal of the skywalk. 2. Re -design of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review and approval by staff, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street in downtown. 3. Removal of the balconies. 4. An additional administrative review of the management plan that includes details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc. prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Additional detail and justification on the academic amenity space. 6. Secure fencing around bicycle parking must be non-opaque (e.g. chain-link). 7. If the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, these changes must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. An example of a substantive change is a change to exterior building materials. Martin asked why staff want to remove the balconies or is staff recommending removing balconies or just not fully screening balconies. Russett replied the balconies are proposed to be fully screened but for safety reasons staff recommend that they be removed. Staff feels like the materials and the screening that are being proposed take away from the quality and design of the building. Martin asked why didn't staff renegotiate what that would look like rather than just take away balconies. Russett acknowledged they did some negotiation with the applicant and they have changed the materials however staff is still not comfortable with the proposed Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 16 of 29 materials and the balconies being fully screened with those materials. They've told the applicant the best option is to remove the balconies. Martin next asked why staff want the skywalks removed. Russett stated they were concerned as there's a view shed, an important view shed on Capitol Street to the Old Capitol, and with the opening of Capitol Street that will create that view shed that was once closed, and they are concerned that that skywalk will block the view of the Old Capitol. Additionally, staff want the activity in this area to be at the street level and with skywalks they were concerned it could divert potential retail or pedestrian activity from the street to the skywalks. Martin assumed the skywalks are for the residents. Parsons agreed noting especially since the recreational activities are all only in one of the buildings. Russett acknowledged the skywalk would be mainly used for the residents. Martin noted nothing was said about the airport flight path, so she assumes the height bonus is fine with the flight path. Russett confirmed that was correct. Dyer asked about the provision of affordable housing and what is the provision. Russett replied the applicant must meet the affordable housing requirement which is 10% affordable, either by fee -in -lieu or on site. She will defer to the applicant on more details of their plan. Hensch commented on the landscaped central courtyard and noted given the amount of physical structures around that and he is concerned that all that stuff will end up dying, and it would be wise to have a landscape architect to select species that have a chance of staying alive in there. Hensch stated that all the architecture philosophies now need to be very biophilic oriented and need to be pretty intentional about the selection of that landscaping. He would like to put a stipulation above to have a landscape architect signing off on this to make sure there will be plants that can survive in that environment and are native Iowa so they can handle the cold and the drought and the heat because it's going to be a really tough environment. Hensch stated regarding the balconies, he is a big balcony fan, the 19 -story building across street has 19 balconies, but he can see staff's concern about the screening making it look too institutional so will defer to staff. However regarding the skywalk, the renderings have it to be pretty transparent so if there's a skywalk that people can see through it won't really interfere with the view. Additionally, this is Iowa and it would be nice for people to be able to move between buildings. Baker noted on page seven of the staff report he needs more clarification on that phrase "divert from street level activities". A skywalk to go from one building to another or a skywalk concept in general makes perfect sense to him. Baker asked about the parking changes staff proposes, from angle to parallel, he assumes all those spaces will be metered regardless. Russett acknowledged she doesn't know the answer to that and would have to look into it. On security, Baker notes a phrase on page eight where "staff recommends at least three security personnel providing security 24/7" and wondered if that means literally one person, eight hour shifts, seven days a week, just three people for that entire complex or does that mean nine people, three on each shift. Russett stated it means three people on site at all times. Baker Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 17 of 29 noted the paragraph right below that talking about the plan lacks detail on how this amenity, the academic community space, creates a high-quality living environment, and wondered who's involved in judging it as an academic space, or high-quality. Is it just a staff decision or will they bring in people from the University, who's making the decision about what really qualifies as academic amenity space? Russett stated it would be the Form -Based Code Committee that would be reviewing it. Baker asked if there any University representation on that committee and Russett replied no. Baker feels there should be someone with experience to evaluate academic amenity space and that is not on staff right now. Hekteon stated that is part of the applicants burden and one way that they could support their application is by bringing in evidence supporting the University's practices or something of that nature. Baker also wanted to address the question of balconies again, he has mixed feelings about balconies in general for large developments, he understands why the developer would want them, they are an amenity that people like to have, but is staff's concern only over how they look, an aesthetic question. Russett replied staff wouldn't want them to have the balconies without screening because of the fact that it's student housing and do recognize that they're proposing the screening for safety reasons. Staff is recommending the balconies just be removed. Baker asked if the Commission or the Council says if they can have balconies would they have to be 100% enclosed or perhaps just waist high or such. Russett stated if Council chooses to allow balconies staff would recommend that they were fully screened, 100% screened. Staff has gotten feedback from the Police Department based on their review of the plans, they had lots of concerns with balconies, and they would need to be screened completely. Baker noted in the latest planning magazine that they get every month as Commission members, this month it was on the City of Houston and there's all sorts of designs in there about high rises in Houston and balconies and high rises, and they're not enclosed balconies at all. Baker asked if the concern here that we're dealing with a student population. Russett confirmed that was the concern. Baker asked then how that is concern different than on a 10 -story building versus a three- or four-story building, which has a balcony which is only half enclosed, if a person falls off the three story it can be just as tragic. Russett stated that the difference here is that this is a discretionary review process for a height bonus, and they have concerns with the proposed to balconies. Beyond safety there is a concern about noise and trash, things getting thrown off the balconies, that type of thing. Baker acknowledged then if is the staff recommendation that under no circumstances would they support the inclusion of balconies that were not fully enclosed. Russett reiterated their recommendation is removing the balconies. Baker concurs and would prefer they be removed too, he likes balconies but aesthetically for buildings that size he can see where a design with no balcony having all that balcony space included back into the apartment itself would be would be an advantage as well for the for the developer. Townsend asked after these buildings are completed and after students move in, how long are these plans in place such as the security. Russett said it is in perpetuity. Townsend also noted the buildings are right next door to the University Rec Center so why are all these things included in this building, students pay for those amenities with their Ubills. Russett stated the applicant could address that. Signs asked if the open space calculations are all ground level square footage. Russett confirmed it is, it's the courtyards. Signs interpreted the comments about the amenities as staff thought there were too many amenities in the in the building and wondered what's the reasoning behind that. Russett replied that wasn't the intent, in reviewing the plans, the Form -Based Code Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 18 of 29 Committee didn't have a good idea of how many student study rooms and spaces should be in a building of this size, so they wanted more information from the applicant to justify the square footage, the types of amenities, the computer labs, those types of things that are being proposed. Signs also asked for clarification on staff's thoughts on the size of the sidewalks proposed on Capitol and Court Streets. Russett stated the travel lanes are too wide, the street width. Townsend noted the width of the sidewalks were mentioned in the report. Russett reiterated that the sidewalks on Washington Street are much wider than what is currently proposed along Capitol Street. Baker had one final question about balconies and asked if there are any sort of record of problems with the current balconies in Iowa City, people hurting themselves through balconies now. Russett said the Police Department could probably provide some information on that. Hensch presumes it's more associated with noise generation and people throwing things. Hekteon reiterated what Russett said that this recommendation was informed in large part by input from the Police Department. Townsend voiced a concern of having two 15 -story buildings in that area. It will tower over Voxman, it's going to be taller than the engineering building. Hensch noted when the applicants here they can ask them but noted the elevations are going to be different due to the topical map of the area. Hensch opened the public hearing. Rob Decker (Axiom Consultants) is the project manager for this project and will try to expand on what was presented by staff and then be happy to answer any questions. He began noting he appreciates all the effort that staff has provided them with over this long process, next month will be two years that they've been working on this effort. They understand it's gigantic and there's a lot to digest here. Decker start by showing a video that gives a really good example of the project. Then he will go into a couple of clarification items and go through the building as a whole. Decker next read a prepared statement because this project is so big he wanted to write his thoughts down so nothing got missed. "On behalf of the ownership group and the design team, I want to thank you for the opportunity to talk briefly about this project. I don't want to stand up here for an incredibly long time and I don't intend to, together with Newman Monson we'll give you a rundown of what you're going to see with all the design that this entails. It's incredibly large and while many of us on the team have the benefit of this being second nature at this point, after these many months, we understand that there's an incredible amount to digest. We're incredibly excited about being on the project. It's a really, really unique opportunity to transform this area. This is my hometown, so I'm excited about it. I think it's a game changer for the City. Very few if any private properties present so unique and opportunity is to be essentially on campus while providing private residential opportunities of incredibly high quality that allow for a student experience in such a proximity, walkability, incredible amenities, urban design and more. Not only is what you saw something that would change the landscape of Iowa City for the better, in our opinion, it brings an incredible host of benefits, including an estimated $3 to $4 million Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 19 of 29 annually into Iowa City coffers in the form of property taxes, an estimated $9 million into the affordable housing fund. A reopening of the long -closed Capitol Street with is described as one of the axial entry points to the Old Capitol, its last remaining one of the four. It provides incredibly high-quality safe housing for the students on campus, literally just south of downtown closer than most of the dorms. It makes sense, it fits the site, the height is partially offset by the steep grade of the hill, so it gobbles up a lot of the height. It's less than or equally as tall as high rises that are already in town. It replaces outdated infrastructure, puts a newer building and a new energy code into place in a town that benefits tremendously from that. The impermeable area of the site is nearly the same as what currently sits there with a much higher urban density, density that's called for in the City's Master Plan as well as other student housing studies completed in town. Our analysis of the current market rates and other analyses recently released assume less than 3% downtown vacancy and around 6% in the metro area, which is an incredibly healthy level. In discussions with our colleagues in the industry and from other accounts supplied by Housing and Urban Development arguments can often be made that healthy levels nationally should sit around 8% to 10%. Iowa City within the past decade or so has experienced incredibly low vacancy rates below 1 % downtown. Obviously, these levels aren't sustainable and that's why a number of housing projects have popped up and continue to pop up. The analysis that developers are looking at are still showing really excellent opportunities in town and that's why you continue to see these projects, they wouldn't be completing these projects if it wasn't fiscally sound opinion. And the last thing I would say is, besides making sense for the reasons above, it's been very well received. We've received positive reinforcement or outright support from affordable housing programs, most of them, the local unions, the Downtown Association, countless local contractors and businesses, and numerous members of the general public that I've spoken with and best of all the projects being completed locally. The owners are lifetime residents of Iowa City and a family that made their whole life here. The design teams are Iowa City firms, the general contractors is an Iowa City firm, McComas Lacina that has a wonderful reputation downtown and has been here for decades. The entire team on this project is Iowa City based, you'll never find a project this big that's going to do that again, I guarantee it. And lastly, that project will push an estimated 2 million hours of full-time labor into the economy during it if not more than that, it's probably a low estimate. Their process to get here is basically been nine months of rezoning, nine months of design review of City staff which has been great, Planning and Zoning right now and we're going to move to Council next, as you're all aware, that'll be a two year process next month." Decker next went through the requirements from Zoning that staff went through. (1) Dedication of Capitol Street right-of-way, that's being done, it was agreed to in the CZA, it is a 100 -foot right- of-way that's been blocked since the 1970s and it will open up the axial view to the Old Capitol that is envisioned in the Master Plan. (2) Obtain approval of elevations from Planning and Zoning, that's why they're here tonight. (3) Build the Capitol Street right -for -way to City specifications which they have. One of the things Decker wanted to clarify is that's been vetted heavily with the City already, the vast majority of it meets expectations. The lane width can easily be changed to what the City wants. However, Decker does feel strongly about the angle parking and will address that later. (4) The satisfaction of affordable housing was addressed in a formal memo, they will agree to pay the fee in lieu of to The Affordable Housing Coalition, its near $9 million into the fund. (5) The compliance with the footprint in the Master Plan was shown in a good example earlier. (6) Development of landscaped interior courtyards has been reviewed extensively with staff as well. Decker will read one more prepared statement from their landscape architect, which describes the landscape architecture that they've designed to date. (7) Approval of the architect, that was completed a long time ago and lastly, (8) demonstrating Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 20 of 29 excellence in design for the building and the site. Decker will do a general walkthrough of the site and try to clarify some things. There's sort of a central concourse, or courtyard, but it's more of a concourse that runs between the buildings. One could debate on whether this is four or two buildings, by code it's two buildings because they're connected, but they're designed to feel independent, and that's to meet with the Master Plan. The forecourts are entry points into each of those four facilities. Each one of them, with the exception of the northeast one, has a has a private courtyard that can only be accessed by private residents of the buildings. Voxman doesn't allow for one in that northeast corner. There are parking garages under each structure that are independent of one another, they span the length of each of those footprints. There are two entry points to the garages. The right-of-way is 100 -feet which is really large, there aren't many places in town large, but it matches through the corridor. In addition to the really large setbacks that they've done, it provides what they think is a really bright and open corridor north to south. Decker next read the landscape architecture prepared statement. "An important piece of this project has been the carefully planned landscape features intended to create a beautiful space for pedestrians, motorists and users of the building. Plants, paving materials and other site features were selected to complement existing nearby streetscapes, to provide a seamless transition along east Burlington and east Court Street. South Capitol Street will be lined with trees framing the views of the Old Capitol building to the north, overstory trees will shade proposed parking and complement the surrounding buildings. The resulting tree canopy is intended to create a comfortable pedestrian experience along with the large beds of ornamental grasses, paralleling the generous walkway connecting adjacent spaces. Throughout the site unique planting beds reflect the architectural details of the building, as well the proposed colored concrete accents. Public entrances with seating will be enhanced with the use of ornamental trees, flowering shrubs and a mix of perennials integrated into the surrounding streetscape with perennial beds that wrap around the building. Some entrances are screened by living wall which will create more vertical green infrastructure in an urban environment. A courtyard space between the buildings will be flanked with vegetation and ornamental trees to create a strong access while softening the hardscape. The addition of colorful public art opportunity, varied seating types and accent lighting will create a living environment around the building." Nathan Griffith (Architect, Newman Monson) wanted to speak about the three major goals for the project. One goal is that the project is designed to contribute to the quality and the character of the neighborhood. He will talk about that and speak to that as shows some of the images. Second critical to the project is the student health, safety and welfare and that will be addressed in many different ways throughout the project, including the balconies as well as the skywalk. Third goal is the enhanced pedestrian environment. First Griffith showed an image comparison of the Master Plan footprint and the proposed footprint and pointed out a few different critical parts. One is the pedestrian experience along the street. On their plan one can see how much frontage at ground level the building will have as compared to what was proposed in the Master Plan, and with that they were able to obtain goal one by creating the forecourts and courtyards and a more friendly pedestrian experience as you're walking along the street. Another point is the step back of the buildings as compared to the Master Plan footprint, at the north side of the site there is an additional 10 feet of stepback and the south tower is 15 feet to allow for more sunlight and access to sky. Thirdly, the towers as tight and efficient and spindly as possible so that it really reduces the scale of the building from Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 21 of 29 an urban sort of context. Next Griffith showed a few images showing the context of the project within the City and how the building is broken up into pieces and the way that the colors of the cladding start to allow the building to dissipate into the sky being a lighter color, rather than a darker color, which is very much in tune with the neighborhood. Voxman School of Music has the same material, terracotta cladding which has a light gloss to it, which will start to reflect in the sky and the surrounding environment. As one approaches from the west, the recesses of the building are much deeper than one might see on a building like the Rise and that matters a lot to how one experiences the project on the urban setting has been broken up into smaller components. Griffith pointed out they were very intentional and have the living spaces pointed away from the building per se as opposed to facing towards the courtyards. For instance, from across the front edge, the living space for the west building to the east building is 160 feet in distance and they thought that was critical to the safety and security of the students as they're living. Looking at the development from the south in the foreground would be an office space on the first floor, the materials are just a bit darker, which kind of grounds the building, but also a lot of glass striations along the facade, as well as many different recesses, including the forecourts, enhance the pedestrian experience on the street, and make it a friendly experience as you walk through. Next Griffith showed some images one would walk through the development as a pedestrian again noting the many, many plants and benches and sort of colored paving and things that will help make this place more friendly and engaged and give some depth and friendly experience to the pedestrians. He showed an image of the community space and potentially a classroom area where they could host lectures or informal gatherings. He then showed the forecourt areas, re- emphasizing some of those design characteristics of the way that forecourt is designed to engage the building and becomes more friendly. Some of the elements are the dark paving with the light paving, aligning with the building, colored plantings and things. He showed the connection over on both the west building and the east building and where that connection starts. The connection is 40 feet off the ground, it's the height of a four-story house. The width of that space is 48 feet wide, and the depth of the soffit is 50 feet. Regarding nuts and bolts of the skywalk, it is at the fourth level of the project and set back from Burlington Street. They are very purposeful in the way that they are cladding the skywalk with transparent glass that can be seen through, but also in the way that it's structured so that it appears very spindly and skeletally and would then dissipate into the sky in the way that the colors might reflect the surroundings. They don't think that it impedes the view corridor of the Old Capitol. Griffith added it's worth noting the safety and security point of the skywalk and most of the amenities in the two buildings are in the west building so having access to those amenities is critically important to the success of the east building. Griffith next took a moment to talk about the balconies and showed an image, an example, of the type of material and the application on a residential project. The balconies will be 5 -foot by 15 - foot spaces which are very generous for balconies in Iowa City. The 15 -foot side has a perforated metal guardrail. He showed an example of this on a real building in Los Angeles. Without the balconies it will be a cold building. The material on the 5 -foot side of the balcony of t is a metal mesh guardrail and he showed an example of that product in Austin, Texas on a sky bridge that connects a couple residential buildings. With this material again they are trying to provide as transparent as possible, but keep the safety of the students as they're not able to throw things off or jump off or anything like that. The balconies provide a place to soften the Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 22 of 29 edges of the building and help reduce the scale, as well as providing for vertical lines that reduce the building beyond the larger 50 -foot recesses. He noted the access to light and air is critically important to the student's health in this development, and just being able to go outside and get some fresh air contributes to the success of the project. Students/tenants having access to light and air and just being able to step outside and get some fresh air enhances their experience and their likelihood to rent here and the success of the project. Decker noted that they are not here to disagree or to fight with City staff, he respects their opinions, as again noted they've been great to work with, but they obviously have their own opinions on the project. The reason that the angle parking is important them and the reason that this is different than Washington Street is it is not a street lined with businesses, it's a housing project. It does have a few scattered offices and businesses on it and therefore those additional 20 parking stalls are incredibly critical to the success of those few businesses that are going to be there. The project already has a very small amount of parking for how substantial it is and they don't feel like it detracts from the Capitol Street corridor. With regards to the skywalk it is important for safety at all hours, safety during any kind of weather, to get from one building to the other. A resident should have access to all the amenities if they pay rent there. They shouldn't have to go down into a tunnel in the garages, which would be an incredible safety issue even with cameras and the alternative is they walk outside or there are amenities on both sides, which is not feasible. The better opportunity is to have a set of amenities for the complex that people can access and that is why they want the skywalk. Lastly, Decker said the balconies are probably the biggest issue for them. Beyond the health and fresh air benefits they disagree that they're displeasing visually and think they help break up the facade in ways that help it correspond with the code and softens those corners. With such a big building softening the corners makes a big impact. Additionally, nearly all of the other high-rise and mid -rise buildings in town have balconies. They spent a lot of time working with staff on the materials and look of the balconies, they also spent a lot of time with ICPD and met with them three different times to talk about these balconies. They've heard what people have said, and they've adjusted things to try and get what they want to have on the buildings but in the way that makes sense and meets as many of those boxes as they can. Lastly, leaving them off could make the building functionally obsolete. This building is going to be around for 100 or more years. Yes, it's intended for students now but it might not always be for students. Student populations may decline, they may increase, at some point the upper floors may not be students, the upper floors may be professionals, they may be retirees, the building may convert to retirees down the road, they don't know. Leaving off those balconies is something that can never be corrected. Griffith addressed the amenities and how they came to the amount of academic and recreation spaces in the building. The owner has gone way beyond necessary to achieve a successful project and they did a comparison of the study spaces and academic spaces of this project with the Rise as a comparison example of a project near this one, and this project has per bedroom twice the amount of area of academically oriented spaces. And not only that, but those spaces are spread throughout the building, on each floor, there's a study space, which is not anywhere else in Iowa City. Baker asked about the amenities and if that was the case they made to the staff and the staff has said that's not clear. Griffith stated that's a recent study that they had done so this may be the first time everybody's hearing this. Hensch noted the skywalk that will be built, if approved, will be transparent and that is the Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 23 of 29 intention, not just a rendering. Decker confirmed noting if they vary substantially from the renderings they need to ask Council for permission or changes. Hensch asked an elevation question in what the change in elevation from Madison Street to the west wall of the Voxman building is. Decker said the elevation change across the site is a difference of 30 feet. Just by appearance wise it's really going to look more like a 11 or 12 story building rather than 15 stories and be lower than Hilton Garden Inn. The top of the flagpole of the courthouse is very similar to the height of this building. Hensch thanked him for reading the statement from the landscape architect. He noted however historically they see lots of really good drawings and then when it's actually implemented all those plantings and trees and grasses suddenly aren't there, or they're dead the first year and they never get replaced. Signs noted a lot of the images show a lot of colorful artwork is committed and will be there. Griffith noted the artwork is conceptual, they are not seeking additional height for artwork, which can be done. The City wants a really engaged experience with this building and artwork is one opportunity to do that. That's something that would have to be vetted but it would enhance the building. Signs agrees that it enhances the building and would be very disappointed if it wasn't there when it was done and makes a big difference on how he looks at this entire project. Martin commented that earlier in the presentation they said there were these sorts of murals in the project and wanted them to confirm that was their intention. Griffith confirmed. Martin asked for clarification having heard a couple of different words such as private residence and student housing and to her those mean different things and what is the current vision for who's living there and how they're living there. Decker replied it's not a dorm, so it's a private student residence. They expect mainly upperclassmen who want to stay downtown. Martin asked if people other than students can live in the facility and Decker confirmed anyone can live there, not just students. Yes the intent is students but if 200 people come and ask if they can live at the top of it that certainly could be a possibility and then making the upper stories have a different look to them. Martin then asked about the security. Decker noted the security plan is complicated and they've gone through it with City staff numerous times, it's not finalized but will be finalized as part of the process. Martin did note she would hate to see that project without balconies. Hensch asked about the step back issue and if there were going to be two step backs, or just one step back. Griffith replied just one step back. Hensch asked at what height. He added that will affect how the balconies above that appear. Griffith said the step back is at the 4th story and because of the slope of the site, the stepback is anywhere from 30 to 50 feet up and also those setbacks are different, they're skinny up on the north side and they're back down below. Martin did note she would hate to see that project without balconies, asked based on the picture they showed if someone fall out of that balcony. Decker noted people have asked him this and the truth is someone could take a chair and shatter a window easier than break through that Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 24 of 29 metal. Martin again reiterated she is not concerned. Dyer noted being a retired professor, she noticed the community space spaces on the upper levels are smaller than her living room for 30 apartments, that seems inadequate, and there are no lounges like there are in dorms for gatherings other than studying. The other thing she thought of that doesn't seem adequate is all the fancy recreation places, there are no restrooms or locker rooms and going around the track for half an hour, one might need to use a bathroom. It just seems inadequate in in that respect. Another thing that disturbs her a great deal is making affordable living in lieu of the buildings that are on this site, a relatively affordable housing close to campus and replacing affordable housing close to campus with luxury residential housing close to campus, and wherever those $9 million dollars are going to go with someplace else farther from campus. The City is trying to integrate affordable housing within the community, scattered throughout the community and this is a monstrous project closing out affordable living. The last thing that bothers her a lot is blocking the light from the offices in Voxman Music Building. It's going to have a blank wall they are looking at and that is not neighborly. Dyer said for those reasons she is going to vote no. Decker addressed the question on size of the study spaces on the floors. As already mentioned they have way more than any other building of this size. a lot more than approved buildings in town. Additionally there are a lot of very large spaces on the ground floor, that was that was done intentionally because the engagement with the pedestrian experience in a building that doesn't require any commercial space on the ground floor, it could be residential all the way up, is incredibly important and they felt like those spaces will be were students are engaged. It is not a dorm, it's a private residence but it's also important to the City that they have that type of engagement. They feel it is a better project than having large spaces up above. With regards to the affordable housing comment, the units that are going to be there, he would not call these luxury or that this is going to go into any kind of luxury. The units there now, the Pentacrest Garden Apartments are not the cheapest apartments, they are not affordable housing. The inventory that's there and the inventory that's going to go there are not that much different in terms of rent, but the units and amenities will be so much better. In terms of paying the fee in lieu of was because City Council was very interested in seeing the fee in lieu of, they didn't see that this project is a great place for the application of an affordable housing. It is not a location for a family looking for affordable housing. Voxman in terms of shadow, the majority of that side of the building is not offices and that's not where most of the windows and engagement are. It also won't be in shadow until midday through late in the evening. That's what the loading dock is, that's where the backdoors to most of the area go. He acknowledged there are some windows on that side of the Voxman Building but stated one can't put up a project like this without impeding on something. In terms of the bathrooms and the amenities there Griffith stated the spaces will have bathrooms. Griffith also mentioned they did a study of the way the windows align with the Voxman Building and did what they could to misalign them so that no one is looking right into an office or a person in the office is not looking right into a living room. Townsend noted looking at the floor plans for the spaces and wondered what the differences are in square feet from the efficiencies to the three bedrooms and why the efficiencies are kind of tucked in between. Griffith said on the fourth level area the efficiency units are 254 square feet and the three-bedroom areas are 963 square feet. Townsend asked how many elevators are in Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 25 of 29 each building. Griffith replied there are four elevators in the west building and five elevators in the east building, one of the elevators in the east building will serve the restaurant. Additionally there are two staircases in the west building and three staircases in the east building. The building has been designed to meet all egress codes and will be reviewed when they get the building permit. Baker asked if regarding the balcony question, was the total enclosure the original plan or was that an accommodation to a concern raised by the staff? Decker replied they originally proposed open balconies but are okay with the totally enclosed concept now. Baker noted his concern is he can't visualize that on a giant building will look, that's just a leap of faith. Martin asked if it is similar to some of the ones at Vetro. Griffith noted it is the same material. Townsend asked about the student height bonus if other people are going to be living there as well. Decker said to get the height bonus is half a floor of the whole project. The Capitol Street transfer is all but one floor, there's enough square footage in the 304,000 square feet to go from 8 to 14. The last sliver is a combination of historical transfer from the Tate Arms and student housing. Baker noted he has no problem with the height and overall design of this project and hated the buildings that were there now. This is a dramatic improvement over what's there in a lot of ways for the City. His question is on the skywalk, it seems like a missed opportunity. It is such a visible part from the public point of view and seems like a missed opportunity on some sort of design that sets it apart with artistic contributions. Baker feels somebody needs to take that concept and create something original for that space and accomplish the same purpose. It's such a significant visual part of the project that is not really taking advantage of the opportunity. Decker added quickly that in regards to University engagement, he met with Rod Lehnertz and David Keft on this three or four different times, they're very aware of what is happening and have been supportive of it. The other person they met with was Melissa Shivers, Director of Student Engagement, to get her input in terms of security, how students are being treated, what their lessons learned are from dorms, all those good pieces and try to integrate as much of that as they can into their design. Bill Gearhart (President, State Building Construction Trades Council) and has been a resident of Iowa City since 1969. He has seen a lot of changes. The Building Trades Council is an umbrella organization for the 16 different craft unions that perform construction work. They are excited about this project, it's big, its bold, it goes up instead of sprawls and it replaces a bunch of outdated apartment houses that are there now. This is going to be a big improvement and going to be a lot of jobs for a lot of construction workers. 2 million -man hours is an awful lot of paychecks for skilled trades people and their selection of a general contractor that's local and does quality work, is going to be really good for the building, for the building trades, and for our city. So they are in complete support of this project. Hensch closed the public hearing. Parsons moved the Commission approved DRC19-04, an application submitted by Rob Decker requesting a Level 11 design review which includes a 7 -story height bonus request Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 26 of 29 for two 15 -story buildings located at 12 East Court Street including the seven staff recommendations. Signs seconded the motion. Hensch stated he is always super supportive of staff, but he happens to disagree with them this time about the removal of the skywalk. A transparent skywalk would not obstruct the view, this is Iowa with terrible weather and it's integral to this project. Hensch noted he is a big fan of skywalks, the skywalk between the County Administration Building and the Health and Human Services Building was just a brilliant idea, he uses it every day. He has mixed feelings about the balconies, he purposely drove around buildings around town to look at balconies today and noted that on the Chauncy all 19 stories has balconies. He can understand the police department's concern with younger persons and their behavior sometimes, but it would be unfortunate to not have them. Hensch noted feeling much better about the landscaping after hearing the statement from the architect. Martin also notes she has been in Iowa City her entire life, born here, and loves the idea of so much happening that is so Iowa City centric, the people that are involved, the building, workers, that's very important stuff. She thinks a skywalk is very cool and liked Baker's idea of something fun with this skywalk such as shown in the picture of something in Houston that had a swanky skywalk. Martin also stated she loves a balcony, she sells a lot of real estate and people love an outdoor space, no matter in what form. She also really likes the art piece, more art the better. Signs stated he is in agreement with both the skywalk and the balconies, he thinks the skywalk is an added positive note to this project. As one is driving up the hill, they may lose a 10 second view of the Old Capitol but that is not a huge problem. The fact they've made such a broad streetscape and really opened up that area makes a better view. Signs noted he would be in favor of taking out the recommendation to remove the skywalk. Additionally he feels the balconies are important. What concerns him the most is noise, but that is present in almost any student housing situation and they are used to it whether it's right good, bad, right or wrong. He is personally am not a huge fan of the color scheme but will note let that sway his decision. He is totally in favor of allowing balconies as long as they are screened and protected so that people aren't throwing things off the 15th floor and doing things like that. He does feel the look is extremely monolithic and was hoping to see some rooftop terraces and some variation in height but overall they've done enough other nice things that he can live with. He is inclined to vote in favor after they remove the skywalk and balcony removals. He also really wants to emphasize how important artwork is to the beauty and character of the project. Finally, he hopes the landscaping plan does work well and is maintained well as they say it will be. Parsons stated he is also in favor of removing staff recommendations one and three and feel others have summarized his opinions as well. He does really hope that the developers follow through with the artwork and landscaping because the ground floor is what people will see. He really impressed by the project and thinks it will be a great asset. Signs added one more comment, he doesn't have a problem with the angle parking, he thinks it adds to the width of the whole corridor there and would rather see 40 parking spaces over 20 because it is such a large project. Planning and Zoning Commission January 16, 2020 Page 27 of 29 Baker noted he is very pleased with this project he has never been bothered by the height question considering the topography of the area. He did reiterate the design is a leap of faith, it looks good on paper, hopefully it will look like that in reality. Going back to the question of the skywalk. If there is going to be a skywalk, he'd like for the Commissioners to mandate that skywalk design go through some sort of design review process that requires a little bit more thought from the developer about what the thing will look like. In a sense it can be a form of public art and be functional at the same time. Regarding the balconies, he is not bothered by the balconies and experience has shown balconies are useful and not necessarily a dangerous part of any large project. He is not too thrilled about the total enclosure but if that's what the City and the developer can compromise on, that's fine too. He also has no problem with the angle parking. The academic community thing can be resolved one way or the other. Overall it's a vast improvement for the area. Dyer stated she thinks it would be good to remove the angle parking, it's a lot safer for bicyclists to not have angled parking and there are going to be a lot of bicycles in this building and it's not permitted to ride on the sidewalk downtown. Hensch agrees noting the most dangerous part of driving is backing up and if they can minimize people backing up they should do that. Martin commented as a bicyclist she likes angle parking better because she has been doored from parallel parking. Parsons moved to amend his motion on DRC19-04 to approve DRC19-04 with staff recommendations four through seven. Baker asked if there was any desire to make the skywalk go through some sort of design review process. Hensch noted the whole process will go through a design review. Hensch asked if Parsons wanted to include the angled parking recommendation in his motion (recommendation 2). Russett asked to clarify stating the issue is not just with the angled parking, it's also with the width of the travel lanes and width of the sidewalk as well. Hekteon stated ultimately that's going to be a City owned right-of-way so in terms of how it's designed, the City has significant more amount of control over that. Parsons moved to amend his motion on DRC19-04 to approve DRC19-04 with eliminating staff recommendations one and three. Signs seconded that amendment. A vote was taken and the motion passed 5-2 (Dyer and Townsend dissenting). CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: DECEMBER 5, 2019 Signs moved to approve the meeting minutes of December 5, 2019. Townsend seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. Kellie Fruehling From: Tim Weitzel <tweitzel.email@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2020 3:36 PM To: Council Subject: Resolution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street I RISK This letter is in regards to the resolution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street in the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown Zone. (DRC19-04) I am writing to encourage you to approve the height bonus for 12 E Court in at least the amount sufficient to receive the remaining height bonus available from the preservation of the Tate Arms building, a local historic landmark located at 914 S. Dubuque St. It appears there is a disagreement among various parties about what a request for height bonus means --is this a mere formality or is it entirely discretionary? The point of my letter is to say, either way, the height bonus for historic preservation should be allowed. If we hope to save any future historic properties, and the fate of many properties in the Riverfront Crossings District through incentives like height bonus transfers, we need to honor the commitment implied in the zoning code by offering such a provision. In June of 2014 the fate of the historic Tate Arms building was in doubt. The home for black male student in town was necessary because many landowners would not rent to black students. Bettye Tate encouraged her tenants to succeed in life. In many ways, Ms. Tate was their mother. Bettye and her husband provided not just housing, but a home. Ownership of the Tate Arms building had been transferred and demolition appeared all but certain before it became a landmark in 2014. In year previous, preservationists, myself included, had written letters to the editor of the local paper and to city staff. In 2008, Tate Arms was included in the Central District Plan as historic property to look at. In the 2012 Riverfront Crossings District, it was again called out for preservation and now with it came the call for a process to do it. By June 2014, Bob Miklo said in the The Press -Citizen there was a generous incentive program in place, but at that time there still was no guarantee this tangible link to our past would be saved. By August, however, the new owners had decided to request the building be considered for a local landmark, which was passed in January, 2015. Again, local papers chronicled the event, The Gazette reporting the landmark status would allow extra floors elsewhere (Gazette January 02, 2015) Through changes in the zoning code, development rights to the property were able to be transferred to another location. This proved to be the incentive to convince the property owner to make the decision to save the historic building. But the first receiving site wasn't tall enough to accommodate all of the potential height bonus, leaving remaining height bonus to be used at a later date. That time has come, and the new site proposed is 12 E Court. There is a maximum set in the code for building heights in the subdistrict that include 12 E Court Street. The proposed project does not exceed that maximum. You should allow the transfer of development rights. Denying the height bonus for historic preservation will strongly discourage the use of property rights transfer in the future. Without this incentive or landowner approval to landmark buildings, there is little we can do in the future to prevent other historic buildings from being demolished. Best Regards, Tim Weitzel Kellie Fruehling From: Lakadat, Colin J <colin-lakadat@uiowa.edu> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 8:55 PM To: Laura Bergus; Susan Mims; Mazahir Salih; Pauline Taylor, Bruce Teague; John Thomas; Janice Weiner; Council Subject: Student Housing Development A RISK Hello, Thank you again for coming to the Joint Meeting with UISG and GPSG in the IMU. I just wanted to formally submit my input on the development at 12 E Court St. To make it simpler, I organized my points below: 1. As we reached a consensus on during the meeting, students strongly believe that the amenities proposed in this building are not ones that students need or want as they contribute to an unnecessary means for the developer to inflate prices and prevent affordable housing from existing in the area. With a state of the art Rec facility across the street that is free for students, the recreational facilities proposed only contribute to unnecessary height additions and facility duplication. Additionally, with the library across the street, with over 2000 study seating areas and hundreds of computers as well as a cafe and food vendor, the academics and restaurant amenities proposed would also be unnecessary and could contribute to unreasonable and unnecessary price inflation. 2. Only having 3 security guards in a building right next to downtown that is 15 stories tall and filled with students (who will most likely drink) is not even close to efficient. RISE is notoriously known for being the host of parties, having hazardous material spilled and scattered about, and being an uncomfortably noisy place to live for residents. Residence Halls have 1 'security' guard for each 45 residents. With this amount of security, there are still countless incidents that occur each year. With this math, not even 41 security guards would prevent dangerous, and sometimes life threatening situations given the number of tenants in this proposed development. 3. Affordability is truly the one and the only thing students care about when looking for housing. $1000+ per person a month for rent, a price these apartments will most likely reach given the prices of many other luxury apartments in Iowa City (a price only $SO more than the rent for the existinz run- down units that are there now), is completely and entirely out of the price range for students. 4. The reputation of the developer of this project is just more than a red flag. The Clark brothers, whom own a monopoly of property in student housing, have a F form the BBB, have faced and lost countless lawsuits from tenants, and have notoriously been known as the landlords that get rich off of scamming and scheming student dollars. For students, this is seemingly just another way for them to rip off the students and make the City of Iowa City look like the bad guys. In short, granting this height bonus to a company that only aims to make the most money they can by building a development filled to the brim with amenities student do not want, would be a monumental poor choice on behalf of the City Council. Students look to the city for security and guidance when navigating their local landscape. Making the choice to go against student interest after acknowledging the concerns of students would cause students faith in their local government to dissolve. Thank you for your time and consideration, Colin Lakadat - UISG t &UISG ujotrt C�vdrFmWnt Colin Lakadat he/him/his Cabinet Director - UISG Conference Coordinator - ABTS e: Colin-lakadat@uiowa.edu Kellie Fruehling From: Greg Shill <gregoryshill@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 7:19 PM To: Council Subject: Climate action plan and proposed residential development at 12 E. Court Street r A111 Dear Members of the City Council, I am a professor at the University of Iowa law school, but write in a personal capacity as an Iowa City resident. This city has recently recognized the urgency of climate change, but to date its actions have not matched its verbal commitments. A 15 -story residential development has been proposed at 12 E. Court Street. As someone who lives very nearby (two and a half blocks east) and travels past this site every day to get to work, I would be among those most impacted by the project. Based on my understanding of the project, I'm writing in strong support of it. I see one prominent critic of the project has denounced it as a "serious mistake" and claimed it is out of character because it is taller than that person's tastes would allow. I do not believe it is out of character with our city today. Moreover, it is very much in character with the direction our city needs to go. Further, I must say I find aesthetics to be an extremely weak basis for opposing dense homebuilding in a time when we have both declared a climate crisis and continue to have lots of very ugly buildings (the Centurylink building comes to mind) that are exempt from the kind of subjective judgments some would subject new buildings to. We also cannot allow a NIMBY attitude to take hold in Iowa City. We must be open to all comers and open to change—and be sure to support change when it moves us in the direction we want to go. This project appears to offer material benefits from every perspective. All the evidence on climate says that if we are serious about reducing our carbon footprint, we need to allow density downtown. The evidence on urban planning, equity, and prosperity echoes this view. Making it easier for people to live downtown will help keep our downtown lively, even in an age when people can order goods, services, and food online. And we know that people want to be downtown and live downtown in our city. Already 40% of people who work in Iowa City commute from other counties. Making it easier to live in the center of town is a no brainer. The one thing I think the council should get clarity on is whether this project is going to be overparked like so much postwar development in town. The evidence shows that dedicated off-street residential parking tends to encourage higher levels of driving, which contradicts our climate commitments. This site is alread an island in a sea of parking. Not only is it across the street from a giant garage (Capitol Street), it is bounded by thousands of additional garage and surface parking spaces. I have attached screenshots depicting this. Since I live in the area, I see this every day. The area south of Burlington, in our rapidly expanding downtown, is a giant parking lot with a few buildings sprinkled in it. I'd add that many students (who are the declared market for this project) do not own cars. Indeed, a great virtue - unique in Iowa, really - of our city is that it is possible to live downtown without a car. Given our climate and affordability commitments, I don't think we should be mandating that developers build expensive parking downtown. Parking garages cost $25,000-50,000 per space, which will get rolled into the rent on these homes and make them unaffordable. Future residents who wish to bring cars have plenty of other convenient options, as indicated in the screenshot. I believe this project should proceed with a maximum number of parking spaces, and it should be low. I am happy to discuss this if helpful. Best, Greg Shill Lllf=on, v ko F !VI : � r "'NMI CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City. Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 3 56-5 000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org City Council Agenda — February 18, 2020 Information submitted between distribution of packet on Thursday and close of business on Monday. Late Handou4s): Planning & Zoning Masters 11.c.12 E. Court Street -Level 11 Design Review Height Bonus Request --- [Staff response included] Ashley Platz From: Kevin Boyd <kevinmboyd@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 10:56 AM To: Anne Russett Late Handouts Distributed Cc: Council Subject: Re: 12 E. Court Street Comment ',? � L _ 2 AR1111 (Date) Thanks for forwarding, Anne. I think it's also worth noting the vote was unanimous. Thanks, Kevin Boyd Chair, Historic Preservation Commission On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:37 AM Anne Russett <Anne-RussettC@iowa-city.ore> wrote: At the Historic Preservation Commission's 2/13 meeting they voted to formally comment on the 12 E. Court Street project. Below is the statement from the Commission. Original message From: Kevin Boyd <kevinmboyd@gmail.com> Date: 2/13/20 7:16 PM (GMT -06:00) To: Jessica Bristow <J essica- Bristow@ iowa -city. o rg> Subject: Statement from tonight The early city planners' layout of the city gave us our historic sight lines of the Old Capitol, and later the Johnson County Courthouse. We believe the proposed skywalk and height bonuses for 12 E Court negatively impact our historic vistas. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Kellie Fruehling From: Correa, Anna B <anna-correa@uiowa.edu> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 10:04 PM Late Handouts Distributed To: Council Subject: Height Addition Feedback (Date) Hello to the Iowa City City Council, My name is Anna Correa, and I represent undergraduate students in the University of Iowa Student Government. I had the opportunity to attend our joint meeting on Tuesday to hear about a lot of the great work being done by the Council. I wanted to reach out in regards to the decision you'll be making on Tuesday for the height addition. It seemed a little misunderstood that the Council is not voting on whether or not to allow the building at all. Rather, the question at hand is related to the height allowance of the building. With student interests in mind, I urge you not to allow the height addition. On top of the aesthetic value of the nearby buildings and downtown area, this type of luxury housing is not wanted by students nor will it benefit students. The request for an addition reflects this, as the extra luxuries are not in danger of being removed if the extra height is not allowed. The plans still include 17,000 sqft of recreational space when the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center is down the street, clearly indicating to me that students are not the priority here. My personal hope—and my hope as a representative of the undergraduate student population—is that not allowing the height addition will encourage the developers to consider other locations or consider significant changes to their building design. Thank you for your time, Anna Correa Public Health and International Relations I The University of Iowa Internal Affairs Committee Chair I The University of Iowa Student Government Resident Assistant I Daum Residence Hall 515-803-7270 1 (she, her, hers) Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: A Council members: sauerber@netins.net Sunday, February 16, 2020 11:26 PM Council -WI(,G Late Handouts Distributed Two voters oppose "height bonus" for 12 E. Court Street towers C�— �- (Date) Villa and I have lived in Iowa City for 28 years, and we vote in every election. We strongly urge you to oppose granting the "height bonus" for the 12 E. Court Street towers project for two main reasons: 1. Proliferation of tall buildings adversely changes the character of Iowa City, making it more like a congested big city than the pleasant city it is to live in. 2. The council needs to encourage developers to revitalize the Southeast Side, especially the Iowa City Marketplace and the surrounding area. Please do not approve the "height bonus" on Tuesday. Thank you Sincerely, Vilia and George Sauerberg 12 Gleason Drive Iowa City, IA 52240 c Kellie Fruehlina From: barkerjim@mchsi.com Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 3:11 PM Late Handouts Distributed To: council Subject: "The greenest building is the one that is already built" r 2 (Date) ARISK Council Members, Since a major goal of the city is to reduce the impact of buildings on the environment, I think it would make sense to study the impact of the proposed 12 E. Court Street development before approving any "height bonus". A 2012 study by the National Trust for Historic Preservation found that in almost all cases it is better for the environment to preserve older buildings than to replace them with new buildings, even if the new buildings are LEED certified. If the Court Street project is built higher than eight stories, the construction will be concrete and steel; a much more costly and energy intensive form of construction. These negative environmental impacts would be front loaded and would likely take many decades, if ever, to recoup from operating efficiencies. These upfront impacts should be taken into account in any assessment of the city's progress in reducing its carbon footprint. I think most people in Iowa City are not yet aware of how much and how suddenly the apartment market has changed. Vacancy rates are rising rapidly and it is impossible to predict how high they will go, even without this project. In the Iowa City area, if an apartment is not rented by August, it is likely to sit empty for the entire year. It still needs to be heated and this is a complete waste of energy. To most apartment owners it seems obvious that this is not the time for this massive project. I recommend that we slow down and give this more consideration before making a mistake we could soon regret. Thank you, Jim Barker Here are links to the National Trust for Historic Preservation study and articles about it: https:Hiivinp-future.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/The Greenest Building.pdf https://www.huffpost.com/entry/why-historic-buildings-ma b 1231894 https://science.time.com/2012/01/27/leed-from-behind-why-we-should-focus-on-greening-existing-buildings/ Lacon Svobod6l -r-1-►Lc' cADDRESS CURRENT APP INCREASE NEW APP % INCREASE 505 BURLINGTON ST $5,776,000 $921,850 $6,697.850 16% 820 BURLINGTON ST $176,210 $15,590 $191,800 11% 922 E COLLEGE ST $2,026,510 $315,510 $2,058,020 16% 923 E COLLEGE ST $1,181,910 $187,450 $2,342,020 16% 806 E COLLEGE ST $2,088,980 $336,390 $2,425,370 16% 702 E WASHINGTON $790,720 $152,750 $943,470 20% 625 S CLINTON ST $1,717,750 $327,020 $2,044,770 20% 527 N DUBUQUE ST $2,003,530 $409,510 $2,413,040 20% 427 N DUBUQUE ST $2,435,490 $459,920 $2,895,410 19% 917 E COLLEGE ST $861,000 $93,230 $954,230 18% 923 E COLLEGE ST $1,181,910 $187,440 $1,369,350 16% 716 BURLINGTON ST $1,447,570 $153,000 $1,600,570 18% 308 GILBERT ST $2,629,980 $289,440 $2,919,420 18% 320 GILBERT ST $1,923,740 $302,110 $2,225,850 16% 319 COURT ST $5,313,820 $734,980 $6,048,860 14% 512 S DUBUQUE ST $208,830 $17,050 $225,880 16% 922 E COLLEGE ST $2,026,510 $315,510 $2,342,020 16% 490 IOWA AVE $997,120 $121,470 $111,859 16% 120 E DAVENPORT $1,394,530 $282,160 $1,676,690 20% FILED FEB 1 8 1020 City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: 1 r I C04;qui h CITY OF lOVVA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (3I9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org 1. Balconies: The current draft Resolution states: Whereas, Staff has determined that the proposed screened balconies do not contribute to a high-quality design, but rather would be injurious to the surrounding properties and create a potential safety hazard for residents and the general public, and that the materials proposed for screening the balconies do not adequately mitigate these concerns. And in Paragraph 3(a): No balconies shall be allowed. If Council desires to allow balconies, the Resolution should be amended to add findings about the balconies and delete Paragraph 3(a). Potential findings could be: Whereas, Council has considered the recommendations of Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the balconies, has studied the construction materials, and received additional information from the applicant; Whereas, Council has determined that the screened balconies do contribute to a high- quality design, would not be injurious to the surrounding properties or create a potential safety hazard for residents and the general public, and that the materials proposed for screening the balconies do adequately mitigate these concerns. 2. Skywalk: The current draft Resolution states: Whereas, the opening of Capitol Street will restore an important viewshed of the Old Capitol; and create a well-connected environment, reinforce the public realm network and provide areas of civic importance; and ... Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure the viewshed corridor of the Old Capitol and to ensure an active streetscape consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, that the skywalk be removed; and And in paragraph 2: The request to transfer 304,000 square feet of the Capitol Street right-of-way development potential to the above-described property is hereby approved. No skywalk shall be allowed over Capitol Street. Capitol Street shall be dedicated to the City in fee title without reservation of air rights, particularly for the use of a skywalk or other intrusions into the right-of-way, which dedication shall be made at such time and in accordance with the conditional zoning agreement. The building designs shall be modified accordingly. Capitol Street shall be designed and constructed with wider sidewalks and narrower travel lanes than those shown on the submitted plans, as well as parallel parking, all in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer; If Council desires to allow construction of a skywalk as generally shown on the submitted site plan, the Resolution should be modified to delete the italicized language above and state the following, or something similar: Whereas, Council finds that a skywalk will not materially diminish the viewshed of the Old Capitol; And in Paragraph 2: ... Capitol Street may be dedicated to the City subject to the owner reserving those air rights minimally necessary for the construction of a skywalk over Capitol Street commencing at the 4t" floor of the buildings, which dedication shall be made at such time and in accordance with the conditional zoning agreement. 3. Capitol Street Design: The current draft Resolution states: Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent street reconstruction projects, as well as to ensure a pedestrian - and bicycle -friendly design with wide sidewalks and parallel parking, the plans for the Capitol Street right-of-way be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and ... Whereas, pursuant to the conditional zoning agreement, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the height bonus and development transfer request on January 16, 2020, and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: a. Re -design of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review and approval by the City Engineer, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street; And in paragraph 2: The request to transfer 304,000 square feet of the Capitol Street right-of-way development potential to the above-described property is hereby approved. No skywalk shall be allowed over Capitol Street. Capitol Street shall be dedicated to the City in fee title without reservation of air rights, particularly for the use of a skywalk or other intrusions into the right-of-way, which dedication shall be made at such time and in accordance with the conditional zoning agreement. The building designs shall be modified accordingly. Capitol Street shall be designed and constructed with wider sidewalks and narrower travel lanes than those shown on the submitted plans, as well as parallel parking, all in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer; If Council desires to allow the applicant to construct Capitol Street with angled parking, the Resolution should be modified to delete the italicized language above and state the following, or something similar: Whereas, on -street angled parking is needed to support businesses in the area and will not unduly interfere with the pedestrian and bicycle traffic; And in Paragraph 2: Capitol Street shall be designed and constructed with wider sidewalks and narrower travel lanes than those shown on the submitted plans, although angled parking shall be allowed, all in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer. 4. Environmental Sustainability: The current draft Resolution does not address environmental sustainability. If Council desires to require certain sustainability measures, the Resolution could be amended as follows: Add findings such as: Whereas, consistent with the Council's declaration of a climate crisis on August 6, 2019, pursuant to Resolution 19-218 and City's Climate Action and Adoption Plan, Council finds that constructing this project with certain environmentally sustainable features is essential to reaching the adopted IPCC target of a 45% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 and reaching "net zero" by 2050; and Whereas, the U.S. Department of Energy defines a net -zero building as one that "produces enough renewable energy to meet its own annual energy consumption requirements, thereby reducing the use of non-renewable energy in the building sector. This definition also applies to campuses, (energy) portfolios, and communities." Whereas, Iowa City is one of the fastest growing cities in the state, and any new buildings should be as efficient as possible. Whereas, looking to 2050, this development is a good opportunity for the City, along with the business community and developers, to phase in requirements for buildings to produce on-site renewable energy. Whereas, attention to sustainability and furtherance of the City's climate action goals is essential to a determination by the Council that 12 E. Court demonstrates excellence in building design and is designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. Add conditions such as: The buildings shall be designed and constructed to at least LEED Silver standards under the National Green Building Standard or the LEED Green Building Rating System appropriate to the building type, according to those standards in effect at the time a building permit is issued. The Developer's registered and LEED-accredited architect must verify that the building has been constructed to meet this standard, including a list of the point calculation based on actual on-site achievements and a narrative explaining how each point was achieved. Said verification must be satisfactory to the City Manager or designee prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. LEED certification, however, shall not be required. At least 8 points shall be achieved for the LEED-NC Optimize Energy Performance credit. 2. The Developer shall install rooftop solar modules to generate at least 150,000 kWh annually. If the project is phased, the first phase must include a minimum of 75,000 kWh. 3. The Developer shall install only "low -flow fixtures" in the residential units and common bathrooms. "Low flow fixtures" shall be those that exceed the City's current code requirements by 20% or a lower percentage if the City Manager or designee determines that 20% is not achievable STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r rrM as � h CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg DEVELOPER PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: By: Rob Decker, AXIOM Consultants Nathan Griffith, Neumann Monson Architects r 4 1 memo CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 3 9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org 12EC CLARIFICATIONS and FURTHER DISCUSSION NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 2/18/2020 NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS SEC Above: Google Street View image taken from PointA standing on North Capitol Street looking South toward the Old Capitol. Left: Aerial view of the old Capitol with the 12EC site identified atthe bottom and Google Street View Vantage PointA identified atthe top. Bottom: Picture taken on February 15th, 2020 from a location similarto PointA butfrom the Southern equivalent distance. North Capitol Street Google View AXIOMCONSULTANTS Left: Picture taken from South Capitol Street on February 18, 2020 looking north toward the Old Capitol. Right: Rendering of 12EC from the intersection of Court Stand Capitol St. looking north, toward the Old Capitol. NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS -Fc AXIOMCONSULTANTS 6W r VANTAGE POINT mdl 5'3 SECTION THROUGH CAPITOL STREET OEM B PLAN VIEW NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS 5KYWALKVIEW5HED ANALYSIS ENLARGED SKYWALK SECTION CAPROLSECTON CAPML y' : art, j, r L I Typical upperfloor plan of west building. Key — • Black lines indicate walls and structure that cannot be removed. -- --- Red lines indicate walls that can be removed. Green boxes indicate plumbing chases that can be modified. NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS Adaptability AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 02118/mz0 E BURLINGTON STREET LL 100' 0w I ; 5 I - —27.5- 100- ROW to -4 13.5' 13.5' 5.5' 1 "I CAPITOL STREET - ANGLED AXIOMCONSULTANTS NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS CAPITOL STREET- PARALLEL AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC E BURLINGTON STREET - i- _ e ------ xw8 III - I a U —lp s. I_ I —100' ROW = = � I O O Z Z � — 100' ROW Ell O O Q10 —4'— 19'— ]9' 4'— F (I R�—�I i€ —� e NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS CAPITOL STREET- PARALLEL AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC APPENDIX NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 211812 20 j BURLINGTON_.CLINTON INTERSECTION ., r ■ I I. Ata. BURLINGTON S TAND UI RECREATIONWLDINS ` • , ' r � II II 1 4s fly li k. COURT&CAPITOLINTER CLION— NEUMANN MONSON d OPEN -SPACE RENDERINGS AXIOMCONSULTANTS BURLI SITE PLAN EXAMPLE: CLOVERDALE 749APARTMENTS, LOSANGELES NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS SKYWALK AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 211812 20 ENLARGED ILLUSTRATION OF BALCONIES EXAMPLE: CLOVERDALE 749APARTMENTS, LOSANGELES NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS FULLY SCREENED BALCONIES AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 2/18/2020 ENLARGED ILLUSTRATION OF BALCONIES EXAMPLE: FAIRMOUNT HOTEL SKYBRIDGE, AUSTIN NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS FULLY SCREENED BALCONIES AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 2/18/2020 D NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS SITE AXIOMCONSULTANTS 12EC 18.094 2/18/2020 �eaexo�V•N�••••u xorts NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTS is - cis a_a_ SITE AXIOMCONSULTANTS NEUMANN MONSON ARCHITECTc AXIOMCONSULTANTS PRESENTATION CONCLUDED ar % 04 CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-[826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org I1,G Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA; (DRC19-04) Resolution No. 20-42 A resolution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street in the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown Zone Whereas, in September 2018, the approximate 3.41 acres of property locally known as 12 E. Court Street and legally described as: ALL OF LOT 5, ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET OF SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 101, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREO. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL STREET RIGHT OF WAY BETWEEN BLOCK 93 AND 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURLINGTON STREET TO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COURT STREET, IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4 ON BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF was rezoned to Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown (RFC -SD), subject to a conditional zoning agreement entered into by and between the City and the owner, 100-500, LLC, and recorded in the records of the Johnson County Recorder in Book 5835 Page 404-411; and Whereas, the RFC -SD allows eight (8) story buildings, with the possibility of up to fifteen (15) stories through the use of one or more height bonus or transfer of development rights; and Whereas, in July 2019, the owner filed an application for a Level If Design Review for two (2) 15 -story buildings to be bifurcated by the rededication of Capitol Street, which is allowed only upon Council approval of seven (7) stories in height bonuses for each of the buildings and transfer of development rights in accordance with Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14 -2G -7G for the public right-of-way height transfers, historic preservation transfers, and student housing height bonus; and Whereas, in accordance with the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based code, any request for bonus height shall demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high-quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood; and Whereas, the request for the public right-of-way transfer is based upon the owners' willingness to dedicate some 304,000 square feet to the City to reestablish the Capitol Street right-of-way to and build it to specifications approved by the City Engineer, consistent with the above -referenced conditional zoning agreement; and Whereas, the extension of Capitol Street is envisioned in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and identified as a primary street on the regulating plan that was adopted as part of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code; and Whereas, the opening of Capitol Street will restore an important viewshed of the Old Capitol; and create a well-connected environment, reinforce the public realm network and provide areas of civic importance; and Whereas, the request for the historic preservation transfer arises from the historic preservation of the Tate Arms building at 914 S. Dubuque Street, zoned as a historic landmark by Ordinance 14-4599, recorded in Book 5395, Page 711-713, making it eligible as a "sending site" for a transfer of 34,800 square feet of development rights; and Whereas, Council previously approved a resolution authorizing the transfer of 7,400 square feet from the Tate Arms site to 201 E. Benton and 912 S. Dubuque Streets (Resolution 15-2); and Resolution No. 20-42 Page 2 Whereas, owner now desires to transfer the remaining 27,400 square feet to its development at 12 E. Court Street; and Whereas, the owner supported the designation of the Tate Arms building as an Iowa City Historic Landmark and agreed to ensure the Tate Arms property will be preserved against decay, deterioration, and kept free from structural defects; and Whereas, based upon its adjacency to the University of Iowa campus, the owner has requested a height bonus for student housing, proposing approximately 1,700 bedrooms; and Whereas, to qualify for this height bonus, the project must be located within the University Subdistrict, South Downtown Subdistrict, or the West Riverfront Subdistrict and must be within one thousand feet (1,000') walking distance along public rights-of-way from the University of Iowa campus; and Whereas, this project is located within the South Downtown Subdistrict and is adjacent to the University's Voxman Building, across the street from the College of Education, and less than 1,000 feet from the Main Library, the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center, and numerous other campus buildings, making it ideal for student housing; and Whereas, to qualify for this height bonus, the project must be designed to provide a high- quality living environment for college students; an enforceable plan for on-site management and security must be submitted to and approved by the City; and Whereas, City Code requires that projects with two hundred (200) or more bedrooms, professional twenty-four (24) hour on-site management and security must be provided. Additionally, a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk must be provided in the entrance lobby of the buildings; and Whereas, interior and exterior usable shared open space must be provided with amenities that create a high-quality living environment for students. The security plan must include adequate provisions for management, maintenance, and security of such spaces; and Whereas, a secure bicycle parking/storage area shall be provided and maintained within the building or parking garage; and Whereas, the owner shall maintain a valid rental permit and comply with all applicable City codes; and Whereas, the City reserves the right to inspect the property at any time to verify compliance with these requirements; and Whereas, the owner has submitted an on-site management and security plan that includes professional 24-hour on-site management and security, as well as a professionally staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby of one of the buildings; and Whereas, the plans show interior and exterior shared open space, including courtyards and forecourts, recreational spaces, and student amenity spaces; and Whereas, the plans include bicycle parking areas on the exterior of the proposed buildings, as well as on the interior within the underground parking structures; and Whereas, Staff has reviewed the building and site design plans; and Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent street reconstruction projects, as well as to ensure a pedestrian- and bicycle - friendly design with wide sidewalks and parallel parking, the plans for the Capitol Street right-of- way be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure the viewshed corridor of the Old Capitol and to ensure an active streetscape consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, that the skywalk be removed; and Resolution No. 20-42 Page 3 Whereas, Staff has determined that the proposed screened balconies do not contribute to a high-quality design, but rather would be injurious to the surrounding properties and create a potential safety hazard for residents and the general public, and that the materials proposed for screening the balconies do not adequately mitigate these concerns; and Whereas, Staff recommends that the Owner provide further details at the time they submit a site plan for review and approval, demonstrating that the academic amenity space will be adequately furnished and equipped in a manner that is clearly intended to support the academic endeavors of the residents; and Whereas, Staff recommends that the bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non-opaque fencing; and Whereas, Staff has reviewed the on-site management and security plan, and has determined it meets the intent of the code and finds that it satisfies the approval criteria for student housing height bonus with the following conditions: a. Upon submittal of a site plan review application, Owner shall provide details to confirm compliance with the attached Security Plan, including, but not limited to, information demonstrating: L that video surveillance covers all ingress and egress points and the publicly - accessible exterior common areas with adequate lighting in those areas to support video capture at night, to the satisfaction of the Police Chief, or designee; ii. adequate protocols for the Police Department (PD) to have full access to the buildings and access to the video and security data; iii. detailed protocols on the repair of the video and security system, should any components fail; iv. A commitment to train security staff so that they are well versed in use of video system and have full access to the system. b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall revise the management plan to: L require a minimum of three (3) uniformed security (non -maintenance) personnel provided on-site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; and ii. provide a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby in both buildings; and Whereas, pursuant to the conditional zoning agreement, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the height bonus and development transfer request on January 16, 2020, and recommended approval subject to the following conditions: a. Re -design of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review and approval by the City Engineer, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Street; b. Revisions to the management plan to include details regarding staffing, cameras, accessing video, etc.; c. The provision of additional detail on the academic amenity space; d. The bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non- opaque fencing; e. Council approval of substantive deviations from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials; and Resolution No. 20-42 Page 4 Whereas, Council has considered the recommendations of Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the balconies, has studied the construction materials, and received additional information from the applicant; Whereas, Council has determined that the screened balconies do contribute to a high- quality design, would not be injurious to the surrounding properties or create a potential safety hazard for residents and the general public, and that the materials proposed for screening the balconies do adequately mitigate these concerns; and Whereas, consistent with the Council's declaration of a climate crisis on August 6, 2019, pursuant to Resolution 19-218, and the City's Climate Action and Adoption Plan, Council finds that constructing this project with certain environmentally sustainable features is essential to reaching the adopted IPCC target of a 45% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 and reaching "net zero" by 2050; and Whereas, the U.S. Department of Energy defines a net -zero building as one that "produces enough renewable energy to meet its own annual energy consumption requirements, thereby reducing the use of non-renewable energy in the building sector. This definition also applies to campuses, (energy) portfolios, and communities;" and Whereas, Iowa City is one of the fastest growing cities in the state, and any new buildings should be as efficient as possible; and Whereas, looking to 2050, this development is a good opportunity for the City, along with the business community and developers, to phase in requirements for buildings to produce on- site renewable energy; and Whereas, attention to sustainability and furtherance of the City's climate action goals is essential to a determination by the Council that 12 E. Court demonstrates excellence in building design and is designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood; and Whereas, this application is subject to review and approval by the Federal Aviation Administration. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that, subject to Federal Aviation Administration approval: 1. The request to transfer 27,400 square feet to the above-described property for the preservation of the Tate Arms building is hereby approved. 2. The request to transfer 304,000 square feet of the Capitol Street right-of-way development potential to the above-described property is hereby approved. No skywalk shall be allowed over Capitol Street. Capitol Street shall be dedicated to the City in fee title without reservation of air rights, particularly for the use of a skywalk or other intrusions into the right-of-way, which dedication shall be made at such time and in accordance with the conditional zoning agreement. The building designs shall be modified accordingly. Capitol Street shall be designed and constructed with wider sidewalks and narrower travel lanes than those shown on the submitted plans, as well as parallel parking, all in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer; 3. The request for the student housing height bonus and the attached Security Plan are hereby approved, subject to the following: a. The bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall be secured with non- opaque fencing; b. The academic amenity space shall be adequately furnished and equipped in a manner that is clearly intended to support the academic endeavors of the residents, to be reviewed and approved by the Form -Based Code Committee; Resolution No. 20-42 Page 5 c. At the site plan review stage, Owner shall provide Staff with details confirm compliance with the attached Security Plan, including, but not limited to, information demonstrating: i. that video surveillance covers all ingress and egress points and the publicly - accessible exterior common areas with adequate lighting in those areas to support video capture at night, to the satisfaction of the Police Chief, or designee. ii. adequate protocols for the Police Department to have full access to the buildings and access to the video and security data; iii. detailed protocols on the repair of the video and security system, should any components fail; iv. A commitment to train security staff so that they are well versed in use of video system and have full access to the system. d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall revise the Security plan to: i. require a minimum of three (3) uniformed security (non -maintenance) personnel provided on-site 24 hours a day, 7 days a week; and ii. provide a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk in the entrance lobby in both buildings; e. Council approval shall be required if the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials. f. The landscaping and hardscaping on the private property and within the Capitol Street and Court Street rights-of-way shall be maintained by owner in a manner consistent with the submitted landscape plans, or as otherwise allowed and approved by the City Forester. 4. The buildings shall be designed and constructed to at least LEED Silver standards under the National Green Building Standard or the LEED Green Building Rating System appropriate to the building type, according to those standards in effect -at the time a building permit is issued. The Developer's registered and LEED-accredited architect must verify that the building has been constructed to meet this standard, including a list of the point calculation based on actual on-site achievements and a narrative explaining how each point was achieved. Said verification must be satisfactory to the City Manager or designee prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. LEED certification, however, shall not be required. At least S points shall be achieved for the LEED-NC Optimize Energy Performance credit. 5. The Developer shall install rooftop solar modules to generate at least 150,000 kWh annually. If the project is phased, the first phase must include a minimum of 75,000 kWh. 6. The Developer shall install only "low -flow fixtures" in the residential units and common bathrooms. "Low flow fixtures" shall be those that exceed the City's current code requirements by 20% or a lower percentage if the City Manager or designee determines that 20% is not achievable. 7. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa are hereby authorized and directed to certify this resolution. Resolution No. 20-42 Page 6 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Resolution and any and all supporting agreements with the Johnson County Recorder at the Owner's expense. Passed and approved this lath day of Februa 20 20 Approved by: Attest: �!%ic1Kf� Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk / 1 City Attorney's Office Resolution No. Page 7 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Salih Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: X X X _ X X _x_ Y ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner the -:tk II.G Kellie Fruehling From: Correa, Anna 6 <anna-correa@uiowa.edu> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 10:04 PM Late Handouts Distributed To: Council Subject: Height Addition Feedback (Date) 1 RISK Hello to the Iowa City City Council, My name is Anna Correa, and I represent undergraduate students in the University of Iowa Student Government. I had the opportunity to attend our joint meeting on Tuesday to hear about a lot of the great work being done by the Council. I wanted to reach out in regards to the decision you'll be making on Tuesday for the height addition. It seemed a little misunderstood that the Council is not voting on whether or not to allow the building at all. Rather, the question at hand is related to the height allowance of the building. With student interests in mind, I urge you not to allow the height addition. On top of the aesthetic value of the nearby buildings and downtown area, this type of luxury housing is not wanted by students nor will it benefit students. The request for an addition reflects this, as the extra luxuries are not in danger of being removed if the extra height is not allowed. The plans still include 17,000 sgft of recreational space when the Campus Recreation and Wellness Center is down the street, clearly indicating to me that students are not the priority here. My personal hope—and my hope as a representative of the undergraduate student population—is that not allowing the height addition will encourage the developers to consider other locations or consider significant changes to their building design. Thank you for your time, Anna Correa Public Health and International Relations I The University of Iowa Internal Affairs Committee Chair I The University of Iowa Student Government Resident Assistant I Daum Residence Hall 515-803-7270 1 (she, her, hers) 12 EAST COURT (FORMER PENTACREST GARDEN APARTMENTS) Enforceable Security Plan Resubmittal September 2019 Form Based Development Worksheet Item G.8.b.(1) — Page 19 AxIOMCONSULTANTS 60 E. COURT ST, IOWA CITY, IOWA 522401 319.519.6220 AXIOM PROJECT # 18-0003 AXIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY - SPECIALTY TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. PURPOSE... 1 IL FACILITY PROFILE... 1 FLOORPLANS... 2 III. SECURITY SYSTEMS... 3 LIGHTING STRATEGY... 3 CCN... 4 ACCESS CONTROLS... 4 ALARMS... 5 ON-SITE MANAGEMENT AND SECURITY... 5-6 IV. INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS... 6 PHYSICAL SECURITY... 6 DATA COMMUNICATIONS... 6 V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES... 6 BUILDING MANAGEMENT... 6-7 TENANT and STAFF... 7 VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES... 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES... 6 VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES... 9-10 IX. SPECIAL EVENTS... 10 I. PURPOSE This Enforceable Security Plan establishes a schematic Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for building security controls, implementation of security monitoring, and management of the overall system. In addition to establishing the SOP, this revised plan is provided as part of the overall Design Review Documents requirements for the September 2019 resubmittal. It is the intent of document to detail how our plan meets the requirements as stated in the Form Based Development Worksheet - item G.8.b.(1) - page 19. Overall, we want to reserve the capability to evolve this system over the life of the project design so that it will better serve the residents who live here by maximizing available technologies and capabilities of available systems as they evolve. Smart phone technology will be key to the overall implementation of this plan and we plan to provide an agile, flexible, and trackable service. This will help eliminate unwanted access to the facility and better control over who has access and when, as well as giving them the ability to quickly report (and respond) to requests. Most Importantly- we need the facility to remain functionally relevant for as long as possible and want to make the entire project as adaptable, safe, and usable for a variety of residents as much as we are able. While the intent of the facility is to be primarily students to start, we dont know that it will stay that way or how the facility will evolve over the life of the building. We intend for this building to have a 100 -year lifespan. 11. FACILITY PROFILE The 12 East Court Street (12EC) site, formerly known as Pentacrest Garden Apartments, is composed of a 3.4 -acre lot with a proposed total building footprint In excess of one-mlillon square feet The site will have four (4) mixed-use buildings on it, that are connected North -to -South above the fifth floor at the primary step -back. An underground parking facility two levels deep sits underneath both the West and East set of buildings. All of the four buildings are fronted by forecourts that lead to the primary entry pointilobby of each building. All of the buildings except for the Northeast one have rear private courtyards as well. The overall site is split West -to -East by a central pedestrian concourse per the Master Plan. South Capitol street will run North-South through the site on a new 100'-0" city right-of-way that will be re -opened between Burlington and Court streets. All grade -level entry points are indicated in the diagram below. The pedestrian and bicycle corridor between the structures (Capitol Street) - while not part of the building security plan, is also developed to provide maximum benefit and safety to those walking and bicycling the block. The design basis for this block will be similar to that of the new Washington Street streetscape In Page 1 1 12 Iowa City between Clinton and Linn streets. Pedestrian refuges, pinch -downs, visual screening, and lighting improvements provide a corridor which is safely designed for residents both inside and outside. There are twenty-six (26) total at -grade building access points as well as eight (8) entry points below grade from the parking garage — 2 per level, per side. Al FIM Me. BOOR PLM 0 WEST SIDE Alf"ILEVELM"PIAR Q EAST SIDE Overview of the ground floor entry -points demarcated. Page 1 2 AT -GRADE The primary access points to the buildings are located in each of the four (4) forecourts on the Capitol street side. These access points enter into vestibules and subsequently into lobbies for each building (5, 10, 17, 22.) The stairwells located near each lobby area include emergency egress doors which exit into the private courtyards which can then access the alleyways via secured one-way gates (4, 6, 9, 11, 23.) In the case of the NE tower, the egress door simply exits out onto the rear at -grade sidewalk on the East side of the building (19.) Commercial units and amenity areas are accessed at the multiple location points — some of these will be exit -only configurations (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 24, 25, 26.) UNDERGROUND There are two garage access points located in public alleyways that lead to the underground parking structures. The West garage is accessed at the SW comer of the SW building (12) and the East garage is accessed near the East mid -point in the East alley (20.) The garage accesses will be double 10'-0" vehicle doors with an adjacent person -door. Within the garages there are secured access points into the North -most and South -most stairwells where building entrants can enter the building via the elevators or stairways. The NE stairwell and elevator will also access the proposed rooftop restaurant. 111. SECURITY SYSTEMS 12EC will provide a robust security system to help establish safer and more secure living quarters and commercial spaces for all tenants. Our design team will accomplish this with a proactive rather than a reactive approach. Our design approach has been to create an environment that is tailored towards safety and an incredible living and learning environment To accomplish this we have provided: • High quality lighting plans • Closed-circuit television systems • Intuitive, adaptable, and modern access controls • Adaptive alarm systems • 24-7 on site security and maintenance • Collaboration with University of Iowa and City personnel Llahtina Strategy (DR3001 Exterior lighting has been strategically placed to highlight the perimeter of the towers including building access points, private courtyards, forecourts, the primary pedestrian concourse, and even the rear public alleyways. The lighting plan will provide sufficient foot candles (FC) as required by the IECC and local codes - allowing for clear visibility throughout the site — without spilling beyond the perimeter into neighboring lots and streets. The exterior lights will be white -hue LEDs with an appropriate temperature Page 1 3 selection, that will operate via photocell activation (dawn -to -dusk.) These will act as a deterrent/security feature while providing adequate lighting for excellent video capture. Interior lighting will be arranged and designed with the same scrutiny as exterior lighting to create a well - lit, safe environment indoors. This will include common areas, shared hallways, lobbies, utility areas, amenity spaces, and underground parking facilities. These areas will provide 24/7 lighting to ensure proper monitoring via closed circuit television systems and keep areas of public traffic visible. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) 12EC will be monitored 24/7 by CCTV cameras throughout the facility. This will include entry doors, vestibules, lobbies, amenity spaces, parking garages (360 -degree 2MP), common hallways (180 -degree 2MP)), forecourts, courtyards and controlled gate access points. Every exacgViswn ingress and egress point to the building will be covered by video (single -point 3MP cameras.) Public areas will also be monitored along the building frontage with 180° cameras that are able to view the central concourse, forecourts, courtyards, and commercial frontages. At this time we intent to use the ExacgVision system, Z -series Hybrid & IP Network Video Recorders or something equivalent. Exacq provides a large -capacity storage recorder which works in tandem with cloud -based uploading to allow for users to view footage anywhere using proprietary viewing software. It also includes a mobile app to allow for easy monitoring and data retrieval. The feed will be a continuous loop which will be viewable at the main security office as well as at each security kiosk. Security staff on site will have full time access to the live -feed video and will be able to monitor the video feeds 24/7. The combination of our conscientiously designed floor plans and strategical placement of cameras will create a complete coverage of the site and building. Electronic Access Control Electronic access controls will be provided via proximity pads throughout the site. All exterior access points for residential areas will be provided with this entry system. Residential occupants throughout the facility will be able to access the building through the four primary vestibule locations in the forecourts. These locations will be locked and security -controlled 24-7 with only authorized residents having access privileges. The NE entry point will be a public entry point during normal operating hours as well as determined restaurant operating hours in the early evening. Outside of operating hours this location will be locked and secured in the same fashion as the other three forecourt locations. IM/90 SERIES „ah aw e„wmwa,.,, Ua E�a� EW u r rn ,n f ift Page The courtyard access points will be egress only and may not re-entered upon exit. Garage access points will be controlled via garage -door -openers, mobile apps, or access codes given only to residents and interior garage doors will be accessible via access panel the same as the forecourt entry points. Access points will be accessible via electronic security panels controlled by key -fobs, reader cards, smart phones or both. Door King high-rise systems are a similar system that has been used in the past and could be utilized on this project although priority may be given to something that is more smart -phone integrated and discourages the possibility of memorizing codes, or giving access out to non-residents. Door King's (DK) 1835/90 Series High Rise Building Telephone Entry/Access Control System (shown in Figure 2) provides digital access control devices such as keycard and fob readers to provide multi-user access into common spaces. There will be door -prop alarms at all building locations outside of the NE primary location and commercial unit entries. This fob and mobile app access system will be implemented on all Parking Garage and Level 1 entry points as detailed above. Residents' guests wishing to enter the facility shall only be able to enter by receiving access from a resident who is in proximity of the building either from a local access point (paneVpad) or via a smartphone app. Individual residential units will also be access controlled with only that units residents being able to access it. Adjustments to units based on move-in/move-out, expired leases, etc... will be able to be quickly and efficiently controlled by the building management of 12EC. Tight controls will be maintained for accessory areas such as the wellness facility, pool, study areas, and skywalk. Access to these areas will be restricted. Alarms Commercial tenants shall be responsible for providing and maintaining their own alarm systems. Primary and secondary entry doors to all residential areas at and below grade shall have alarm systems on them in case of forced entry. This alarm system shall ring to the 24-7 primary office/desk location as well as security kiosks in each building. These systems will ring to security who will then make a final determination whether to escalate the call to the authorities. These entry points will also include an extended -open alarm to prevent stuck doors or instances where tenants prop open doors and Inadvertently leave them unattended. These systems will be triggered to alarm Internally to the help desks after an extended period so that building security can respond. Individual residential units shall not have alarms but may install them upon management approval. On -Site 2417 Management and Security Personnel The primary security, management, and maintenance office will be located on Level 1 in the Northeast building. This location will be professionally managed and staffed 24-7. This location shall have primarily Page 1 5 surveillance, entry, and alarm access to all areas of the entire facility with remote access to all of the security/management kiosks inside of the other three buildings. All locations shall be able to communicate with one another via an intercom system. IV. INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SAFEGUARDS Numerous security safeguards protecting information and technology systems will be present at 12 EC. Based on the type of occupancy, quantity of units, and scale of the building, the follow features are to be provided: Physical Security • All network server and IT equipment shall be in a locked and secured room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have fire extinguishers located within the room. • All network server and IT rooms shall have smoke detectors installed in room. • The network server and IT rooms shall operate on an uninterruptible power supply (UPS). • No food or beverages are to be allowed inside or around network server & IT rooms or enclosures. • When leaving and closing out secured areas, ensure all sensitive and confidential information is properly stored and not left in the open. Data Communications Security A firewall and security services shall be implemented for the communication between the 12EC public Internet access and the general public and business patrons. Future innovations may allow for offsite integration of a number of these features. V. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Building Management Responsibilities The main responsibility of the Building Management is to implement the provided security systems, properly utilize and monitor CCN cameras, provide maintenance and upkeep of security systems, maintain a safer space for occupants, report incidents to local authorities where applicable, and record video for all monitored locations. To exercise the full capabilities of the surveillance and security systems implemented, a central on-site management/security desk will be staffed 24/7 and equipped with monitors tied into the CCTV cameras, providing continuous loop for surveillance of the site as well as the previously described building areas. Fob and mobile access will be periodically checked and managed. Necessary firmware and software updates will be provided to ensure the system is fully functionable and reliable. To help create a safe environment for building occupants, the management and security desk will be available to tenants 2417. Page 1 6 Appropriate personnel will be sufficiently trained to use the video system per the final plan and design once the building is completed. Security personnel on site will be trained to manage the building but staff will only be as good as a call to ICPD. On site security will not be armed or trained to respond to active threats but will respond as quickly as possible to those events with calls to ICPD and direction to personnel who arrive as well as assistance with access to the areas in question. Tenant and Staff Responsibilities All leased tenants shall be required by their lease -contract to act in a responsible fashion with regard to their fellow building residents. Tenants, both residential and commercial, are expected to not prop doors open to prevent unauthorized personnel form entering the building. Residents are also expected to not allow anyone into the building that is not a guest and does not have individual access. Building occupants will be expected to report any incidents involving criminal activity to the building security and management desk. Emergency situations that involve a potential threat to human safety should be reported immediately by residents to the ICPD prior to notifying building management and security. VI. RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AND SECURITY COUNTERMEASURES The main goal of 12 EC's security plan is to provide a proactive approach to public safety to prevent criminal activity from occurring instead of simply reacting to incidents that may transpire. This is accomplished not only by trying to identify smart integration of modem security systems but also by way of smart design and integration. Our project includes a number of well designed and integrated features to achieve these goals: • Smart layouts of floorplans with good sight lines and lighting levels • A well -constituted exterior lighting plan providing high quality LED lighting to vital exterior areas as well as lesser considered areas like the heavily -trafficked public alleyways behind the buildings. • Residential unit access controls tailored to individual residents and easily a@ered/adjusted by management. • Residential unit door design with solid -core frames in a swing -out configuration so that doors to residential units would be very difficult to break into compared to more typical apartment design. • Integration with City and University personnel to allow for review of final design and security considerations in order to provide good dissemination of information and a provision of lessons learned. Page 1 7 VII. EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROCEDURES As part of this security plan, local emergency response personnel were contacted to determine expected emergency response times. While not every entity was able to provide such times due to too many unknown variables, a number of information pieces were provided. With 12EC's central downtown location, the site is located within minutes of nearly every available emergency service. Iowa City's Fire Department (ICFD) is within an estimated four -minute response area. Once on-site, the ICFD has access to all sides of the site via primary streets and alleyways. The closest fire station to 12EC is ICFD First Station 1 Headquarters which is located at 20 South Gilbert Street. ICPD is located at the same location as ICFD and can generally respond quickly to this location. While specific response times can not be given due to a variety of factors, expectations are for generally quick and responsive requests for assistance. In addition, this security plan will be reviewed and coordinated with ICPD prior to full acceptance and implementation. University of Iowa Campus Security services are also located close to site — only 1 block away — directly adjacent to the North. ICPD will be given access to video and security data for issues of safety directly related to the building that would cause direct harm to the occupants or the building. The Owner intends to work with the ICPD as necessary to maintain a safe and secure environment and allow ICPD access to reasonable amounts of information per their ongoing requests. In much the same way that the dormitories work with calls from RA staff (or general residents) to public safety to events/active threats — the intent at our building will be for security staff (or residents) to call ICPD to respond to these events quickly and effectively. Emergency medical services (EMS) have reported to have a response time of under five -minutes in urban areas which include downtown Iowa City. To aid in the response procedure of EMS responses, personnel will have access to all sides of the site as well. The closet EMS service station is Johnson County Ambulance Services which is located on 808 South Dubuque Street. A University of Iowa Quick Care clinic is located only 2 blocks from the site on Clinton Street. Page 1 8 VIII. MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND TESTING PROCEDURES C f IA To ensure security systems are working as intended, periodic testing of systems and equipment will be performed. Staff or security will perform periodic walk-throughs of the site to ensure proper function of access points, gate latching systems, and camera mounts. When staff confirms doors are able to latch properly, they will then assess the electronic access control at each building entry to check that doors are locked when closed, that they respond to the access fob, and that the door unlocks appropriately. While checking entry points, 12EC's surveillance systems will be analyzed to verify no objects are obstructing the view of the cameras. Staff or security will also verify the cameras are capable of overseeing the entire area intended to be monitored by said device and adjust accordingly. If an item is rendered inoperable, it Page 1 9 shall be addressed in a reasonable amount of time. Broken equipment shall be noted and repaired as necessary. The type of system 12EC will implement will provide complete and ongoing feedback loops as to the functioning of the system. All camera function will be available in real time and malfunctioning or broken cameras will be able to be identified immediately. Owner intends to keep the system operational and functional with ongoing minute by minute capability to verify alarm operation, video operation, and failsafes to ensure systemwide functionality. This system is designed to maximize capability without draining WiFi. Ongoing maintenance logs are not as necessary with a live -response system like this but annual inspections and maintenance run-throughs will be performed on the system per the requirements and recommendations of the manufacturer. Freeman Lock and Alarm/ATEC, who will install and maintain this system for the Owner has confirmed this is the typical protocol for these newer systems and they will be in charge of maintaining them at all times. Tenants shall also be responsible for reporting any observed defects in security access systems that affect building access points and tenant dwelling spaces. In the event a tenant requires maintenance involving their unit's access control, the tenant shall submit an emergency maintenance request to building management to resolve the issue. The Owner would like to be adaptable to issues and would like to work with the City and ICPD to change building protocols as time goes on and processes and amended towards Iowa City's larger buildings. "How does this building compare to other buildings?" will be critical and the Owner would like to keep security protocols at similar levels. Annual checks of systems should be a part of the annual check of ALL systems (e.g. fire alarms) and part of the overall annual building permit process. IX. SPECIAL EVENTS The primary special event expected at the 12EC facility will be move-in/move-out events. These events will primarily take place in the late May/early June and early August timeframes and, to a lesser degree, in mid December. Because of the large amount of residential units, all move-in/move-out events will be coordinated with the City to facilitate any allowed street closures and to apply for the required permits. In addition, emergency personnel will be notified that such events will be taking place in order to coordinate as necessary. It may be necessary during these times to temporarily adjust the security systems described herein for short periods of time. An additional security person patrolling at periodic high volume times such as these would be a possibility if requested by ICPD. The Owner would like to work with ICPD to determine what these times will be and will address and reformulate these processes based on the future and final design of the building. Page 1 10 It,G Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA; (DRC19-04) Resolution No. A solution approving height bonuses for 12 E. Court Street in the Riverfront Crossings — South Downtown Zone Wherea in September 2018, the approximate 3.41 acres of property locally known as 12 E. Court Street d legally described as: ALL OF L 5, ALL OF LOT 6, LOT 7 EXCEPT THE NORTH 50 FEET OF THE EAST 25 FE OF SAID LOT, LOT 8 EXCEPT THE EAST 25 FEET O SAID LOT, IN BLOCK 10\BCK TY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, ACCORDI G TO THE RECORDED PO. ALSO INCLUDING THE CAPITOL ST T RIGHT OF WAY BETWEE3 AND 101 FROM THE SOUTH RIGHT O WAY LINE OF BURLINGTONO THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY NE OF COURT STREET, IN , JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, A ORDING TO THE RECORDED POF. ALSO INCLUDING LOTS 1 3, 4 ON BLOCK 93, IOWA CITY, ATO THE RECORDED PLATT EOF was rezoned to Riverfront Cros 'ngs — South Downtown/,(RFC-SD), subject to a conditional zoning agreement entered into b and between the C' and the owner, 100-500, LLC, and recorded in the records of the Johns County Recorde m Book 5835 Page 404-411; and Whereas, the RFC -SD allows eigh 8) story stories through the use of one or more h' ht bo( Whereas, in July 2019, the owner filed n f 15 -story buildings to be bifurcated by the dei upon Council approval of seven (7) stories ' h i( of development rights in accordance wi Iowa right-of-way height transfers, historic reservati( and jldings, with the possibility of up to fifteen (15) ; or transfer of development rights; and cation for a Level II Design Review for two (2) ation of Capitol Street, which is allowed only bonuses for each of the buildings and transfer Code of Ordinances 14 -2G -7G for the public transfers, and student housing height bonus; Whereas, in accordance wit the Riverfront Cr sings Form -Based code, any request for bonus height shall demonstrateexcellence in building nd site design, use high-quality building mate/bedeand be designed a manner that contribu s to the quality and character of the neighod; and Ws, the requ t for the public right-of-way tra sfer is based upon the owners' willinto dedicat some 304,000 square feet to the Ci to reestablish the Capitol Street right - to and ild it to specifications approved by the Engineer, consistent with the abovrenced nditional zoning agreement; and Ws, t extension of Capitol Street is envisioned in th Downtown and Riverfront CrossMa er Plan and identfied as a primary street on the regul Ing plan that was adopted as paiverfront Crossings Form -Based Code; and Ws, the opening of Capitol Street will restore an important views ed of the Old Capitol; and ca well-connected environment, reinforce the public realm networ nd provide areas of civic iance; and Whereas, the request for the historic preservation transfer arisesfl m the historic preservation of the Tate Arms building at 914 S. Dubuque Street, zoned as a historic landmark by Ordinance 144599, recorded in Book 5395, Page 711-713, making it eligible as a "sending site" for a transfer of 34,800 square feet of development rights; and Whereas, Council previously approved a resolution authorizing the transfer of 7,400 square feet from the Tate Arms site to 201 E. Benton and 912 S. Dubuque Streets (Resolution 15-2); and Resolution No. Page 2 Whereas, owner now desires to transfer the remaining 27,400 square feet to its development at 12 E. Court Street; and Whereas, the owner supported the designation of the Tate Arms ilding as an Iowa City Historic Land ark and agreed to ensure the Tate Arms property will preserved against decay, deterioration, dQd kept free from structural defects; and Whereas, b ed upon its adjacency to the University Iowa campus, the owner has requested a heigh onus for student housing, proposing ap oximately 1,700 bedrooms; and Whereas, to qua' for this height bonus, the prof must be located within the University Subdistrict, South Do town Subdistrict, or the We Riverfront Subdistrict and must be within one thousand feet (1,0 ') walking distance alon public rights-of-way from the University of Iowa campus; and Whereas, this project is ocated within t South Downtown Subdistrict and is adjacent to the University's Voxman Buil 'ng, across a street from the College of Education, and less than 1,000 feet from the Mai Library, he Campus Recreation and Wellness Center, and numerous other campus building ma ' g it ideal for student housing; and Whereas, to qualify for this heikK bonus, the project must be designed to provide a high- quality living environment for colle tudents; an enforceable plan for on-site management and security must be submitted to an5Vappkved by the City; and Whereas, City Codereq ' es that ojects with two hundred (200) or more bedrooms, professional twenty-four (2 hour on a management and security must be provided. Additionally, a professional) -staffed manag ent office/reception desk must be provided in the entrance lobby of the buil ngs; and Whereas, interior a d exterior usable shar open space must be provided with amenities that create a high -q lity living environment fo students. The security plan must include adequate provisionsTr management, maintenanc and security of such spaces; and Whereas, a sfue bicycle parking/storage area building or parkineggarage; and Whereas, tl6 owner shall maintain a valid rental codes; and Whereas/ the City reserves the right to inspect the with these r quirements; and be provided and maintained within the and comply with all applicable City at any time to verify compliance is, the owner has submitted an on-site managemen and security plan that includes iI 24-hour on-site management and security, as w I as a professionally staffed int office/reception desk in the entrance lobby of one of Xhe buildings; and is, the plans show interior and exterior shared open spa including courtyards and recreational spaces, and student amenity spaces; and Whereas, the plans include bicycle parking areas on the exterior of tt\ proposed buildings, as well as on the interior within the underground parking structures; and Whereas, Staff has reviewed the building and site design plans; and Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and other recent street reconstruction projects, as well as to ensure a pedestrian- and bicycle - friendly design with wide sidewalks and parallel parking, the plans for the Capitol Street right-of- way be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and Whereas, Staff recommends, to ensure the viewshed corridor of the Old Capitol and to ensure an active streetscape consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, that the skywalk be removed; and Resolution No. Page 3 Whereas, Staff has determined that the proposed screened balconies do not contribute to a high-quality design, but rather would be injurious to the surrounding properties and create a potential safety hazard for residents and the general public, and that the material oposed for screening the balconies do not adequately mitigate these concerns; and Whereas, aff recommends that the Owner provide further details at a time they submit a site plan for re 'ew and approval, demonstrating that the academ' amenity space will be adequately furnish and equipped in a manner that is clearly inten d to support the academic endeavors of the res ants: and Whereas, Staff remends that the bicycle parking area 41hin the parking structures shall be secured with non-opa ue fencing; and Whereas, Staff has vie determined it meets the inte i student housing height bonus a. Upon submittal of a compliance with the demonstrating: ved the on-site of the code and th the following c i� plan review ac L that video surveilla accessible exterior support video cap designee; ii. adequate protocols,16r theN buildings and acce$s to the lent and security plan, and has it satisfies the approval criteria for in, Owner shall provide details to confirm including, but not limited to, information Errs all ingress and egress points and the publicly - in areas with adequate lighting in those areas to night, to the satisfaction of the Police Chief, or e Department (PD) to have full access to the and security data; iii. detailed protocol on the repa of the video and security system, should any components fat , iv. A commitme to train security s ff so that they are well versed in use of video s/oa and have full access t the system. b. Prior to issuancbuilding permit, Owner hall revise the management plan to: i. requirenimum of three (3) u 'formed security (non -maintenance) personided on-site 24 hours a da 7 days a week; and ii. providt a professionally -staffed management office/reception desk in the entr ce lobby in both buildings; and Whereas, pursuaq to the conditional zoning agreemen the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed he height bonus and development transfer equest on January 16, 2020, and recommended a roval subject to the following conditions: a. Re -des' n of the Capitol Street right-of-way, for review nd approval by the City Enginper, to ensure consistency with the Riverfront Gro sings Master Plan and other recent City street reconstructions, like Washington Str et; b. Re isions to the management plan to include details regard\bese ffing, cameras, The essing video, etc.; c. provision of additional detail on the academic amenity sp d. The bicycle parking area within the parking structures shall ured with non- opaque fencing; e. Council approval of substantive deviations from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials; and Resolution No. Page 4 Whereas, this application is subject to review and approval by the Federal Aviation Administration. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that, subject to Federal Aviation Administration approval: 1-111 1. The reque to transfer 27,400 square feet to the above-described operty for the preservation the Tate Arms building is hereby approved. 2. The request to t nsfer 304,000 square feet of the Capitol Street ri t -of -way development potential to the ab ve-described property is hereby approved. N skywalk shall be allowed over Capitol Street. Capitol Street shall be dedicated to a City in fee title without reservation of air rig s, particularly for the use of a sk k or other intrusions into the right-of-way, which de ication shall be made at such a and in accordance with the conditional zoning agr ment. The building desig shall be modified accordingly. Capitol Street shall be signed and constructed ith wider sidewalks and narrower travel lanes than those sh wn on the submitted ans, as well as parallel parking, all in accordance with plans and ecifications appro ed by the City Engineer; 3. The request for the student ousing heigh onus and the attached Security Plan are hereby approved, subject to the ollowing: a. No balconies shall be allowe ; b. The bicycle parking area wit 'n he parking structures shall be secured with non- opaque fencing; c. The academic amenity sp a all be adequately furnished and equipped in a manner that is clearly inte ed to upport the academic endeavors of the residents, to be reviewed and appro ed by the orm-Based Code Committee; d. At the site plan revi w stage, O er shall provide Staff with details confirm compliance with the ached Security Ian, including, but not limited to, information demonstrating: i. that video rveillance covers all in ress and egress points and the publicly- /aeessibl exterior common areas 'th adequate lighting in those areas to port 'deo capture at night, tot satisfaction of the Police Chief, or ign .q ate protocols for the Police Dep ment to have full access to the l ngs and access to the video and secu data;iled protocols on the repair of the video nd security system, should any ponents fail; ommitment to train security staff so that they re well versed in use of video tem and have full access to the system. d. Pance of a building permit, Owner shall revise t Security plan to: uire a minimum of three (3) uniformed se urity (non -maintenance) onnel provided on-site 24 hours a day, 7 days a we k; and vide a professionally -staffed management office eception desk in the entrance lobby in both buildings; e. Council approval shall be required if the building plans deviate substantively from the approved design review plans, including, but not limited to, a change to exterior building materials. Resolution No. Page 5 f. The landscaping and hardscaping on the private property an within the Capitol Street and Court Street rights-of-way shall be maintained owner in a manner consiste t with the submitted landscape plans, or otherwise allowed and approved�ythe City Forester. 4. The Mayor and C to certify this res( 5. The City Clerk is supporting agree Passed and approved this Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa authorized and directed rith the Johnson County day of Mayor: authorized and directed this Resolution and any and all at the Owner's expense. 20 Approved by: City Attorney's Office I (3d f acs Item Number: 12. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Robert A Lee Recreation Center Phase 2 Improvements Project establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Prepared By: Ben Clark, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Juli Seydell Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost of construction is $370,000 and will be funded through the Recreation Center ADA Improvements account # R4351 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Building Layout Overview Rendering Exterior Rendering Interior Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item begins the bidding process for the Robert A Lee Recreation Center Phase 2 Improvements Project. The project includes renovations to existing pool deck restrooms, racquetball court, game room and building fire alarm system. All improvements will be compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regulations. Background /Analysis: The 2017 Robert A. Lee Recreation Center Building Improvements Study determined the priority improvements for the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center. These improvements will improve the user experience, update building systems, and improve the overall usability of the space. This project addresses those needs outlined in the 2017 study. The racquetball court, game room and adjacent storage areas presented access, security and safety issues for both residents and staff. These areas will be converted to one larger, multipurpose space to be used for recreation programs and rentals for community use. The space will be appropriate for community meetings and rentals, small fitness classes, and a range of recreation programs. The on -deck restrooms will be converted from two small individual restrooms into one family changing area with changing area appropriate for individuals of all ages needing a caregiver to assist with personal care. ATTACHMENTS: Description Building Layout Overview Rendering Exterior Rendering Interior Resolution STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: 1 r I C04;qui h CITY OF lOVVA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (3I9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org r E -r ti � 4 L:I T ��- I _ _ _ ......................Y- _- P -0 01[21 N I STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r rrM as � h CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg Prepared by: Ben Clark, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240,(319)356-5436 Resolution No. 20-43 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Robert A Lee Recreation Center Phase 2 Improvements Project establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Whereas, notice of public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the above- named project was published as required by law, and the hearing thereon held; and Whereas, the City Engineer or designee intends to post notice of the project on the website owned and maintained by the City of Iowa City; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Recreation Center ADA Improvements account # R4351. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The project manual and estimate of cost for the above-named project are hereby approved. 2. The amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construction of the above- named project shall be in the amount of 10% (ten percent) of bid payable to Treasurer, City of Iowa City, Iowa. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post notice as required in Section 26.3, not less than 13 days and not more than 45 days before the date of the bid letting, which may be satisfied by timely posting notice on the Construction Update Network, operated by the Master Builder of Iowa, and the Iowa League of Cities website. 4. Sealed bids for the above-named project are to be received by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, at the Office of the City Clerk, at the City Hall, before 3:00 p.m. on the 11"' day of March, 2020. At that time, the bids will be opened by the City Engineer or his designee, and thereupon referred to the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for action upon said bids at its next regular meeting, to be held at the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m. on the 24th day of March, 2020, or at a special meeting called for that purpose. Passed and approved this 18th day of February 2020. Attest: Attorney's a -/a - ;ID Resolution No. 20-43_ Page 2 It was moved by Mims and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Weiner the Resolution be Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 13. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution setting the maximum property tax levy for certain levies for the proposed budget ending June 30, 2021. Prepared By: Jacklyn Fleagle, Budget & Compliance Officer Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: Approved as part of the Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Max Levy hearing notice Resolution Executive Summary: The State legislature adopted new law changes regarding the annual budgeting process. Cities are now required to hold a public hearing to set a maximum property tax levy for certain levies. Background /Analysis: In the Spring of 2019, the State law changes incorporated new regulations surrounding the management of the annual budget process. In addition to being adopted as part of the budget, which is subject to a public hearing, a maximum property tax levy for certain levies is now required to be approved by the City Council by resolution prior to the adoption and public hearing for the operating budget. The levies required to be included in the maximum property tax levy are non -voted levies, which for the City of Iowa City include the Regular General Levy, the Transit Levy, the Tort Levy, the Emergency Levy, and Employee Benefits related levies. The total proposed maximum property tax levy for the affected levies is $53,930,125 and the calculated maximum tax rate for the affected levies is $12.92459. The Library Levy and the Debt Service Levy are not affected by this State law change. Those levy rates are $.27 and $2.57846, respectively. The proposed total combined property tax levy rate is $15.77305, which is $.06 lower than the total combined levy rate for fiscal year 2020. The Ag Land Levy rate is also not affected and remains at $3.00375, and the SSMI D Levy rate is not affected and remains at $2.00. The notice of public hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Iowa City, not less than ten days and no more than 20 days before the public hearing, as well as published on the City's website and social media pages. The chosen publication date was February 7, 2020. If the property tax dollars requested result in a greater than 102% increase from the previous fiscal year, a two-thirds majority vote approval is needed. The City does have a proposed maximum property tax for certain levies increase in excess of 102%, and will therefore need approval from five out of the seven Council members. ATTACHMENTS: Description Max Levy hearing notice Resolution CITY NAME NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVY CITY CODE Iowa City I Fiscal Year July 1, 2020 -June 30, 2021 52-483 The Citv Council will conduct a Dublic hearina on the Dr000sed Fiscal Year City Drooertv tax levv as follows: Meeting Date: Meeting Time: Meeting Location: 2/18/2020 T 1 410 E Washington St, City Hall At the public hearing any resident or taxpayer may present objections to, or arguments in favor of the proposed tax levy. After adoption of the proposed tax levy, the Council will publish notice and hold a hearing on the proposed city budget. icgov.org (319) 356-5041 Iowa Department of Management Current Year Certified Budget Year Effective Budget Year Proposed Annual Property Tax Property Tax Maximum Property Tax 2019/2020 2020/2021** 2020/2021 %CHG K Levies: Regular General 2 Contract for Use of Bridge 3 Opr & Maint Publicly Owned Transit 4 Rent, Ins. Maint. Of Non -Owned Civ. Ctr. 5 Opr & Maint of City -Owned Civic Center 6 Planning a Sanitary Disposal Project 7 Liability, Property & Self -Insurance Costs 8 Support of Local Emer. Mgmt. Commission 9 Emergency 10 Police & Fire Retirement 11 FICA & IPERS 12 Other Employee Benefits 13 *Total 384.15A Maximum Tax Levy 14 Calculated 384.15A MaximumTax Rate 15 of sianificant increases in the $30,832,760 $30,832,760 $33,798,675 $0 $0 $0 $3,616,188 $3,616,188 $3,964,042 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,105,564 $1,105,564 $1,211,912 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,001,442 $3,731,297 $3,731,297 $4,090,224 $3,721,172 $3,721,172 $4,079,124 $4,896,433 $4,896,433 $5,784,706 $47,903,414 $47,903,414 $53,930,125 $12.58459 $11.48026 $12.92459 it increases in the budget are the result of several different City Council strategic initiatives, including the addition of permanent staff, an in temporary employee wages, maintaining Affordable Housing initiatives, and expanding Climate Change and social justice programs . Ily, health insurance costs increased by 16% in fiscal year 2020 and are expected to increase another 10% in fiscal year 2021, and wages grew by approxiamtely 4%. *Total city tax rate will also include voted general fund levy, debt service levy, and capital improvement reserve levy **Budget year effective property tax rate is the rate that would be assessed for these levies if the dollars requested is not changed in the coming budgetyear STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: 1 r I C04;qui h CITY OF lOVVA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (3I9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org FY2021 MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 18, 2020 Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY APPROVAL • New requirement passed by State Legislature in 2019 • Levies impacted: • General Levy • Transit Levy • Tort Levy • Emergency Levy • Employee Benefits Levies • Levies not impacted: Debt Service Levy, Library Levy, and SSMID Levy Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX LEVY APPROVAL • Maximum Property Tax Levy proposed - $53,930,125 • Increase of 12.58% over FY2020 • Primary reasons: • Property reassessments • New construction • Added Emergency Levy • Increased Employee Benefits Levy • Does not reflect decrease in Debt Service Levy • Increase of greater than 2% requires 2/3 majority of City Council to approve FY2021 BUDGET OVERALL • Property tax rate is decreasing by $.06 from $15.833 to $15.773 • Total property tax revenues budgeted to increase by 9.2% (including SSMID) • A separate public hearing is still required to adopt budget • Approval of the maximum property tax levy is the required next step Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director QUESTIONS? Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r rrM as � h CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg Prepared by: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5053 RESOLUTION NO. 20-44 Resolution setting the maximum property tax levy for certain levies for the proposed budget ending June 30, 2021. Whereas, Iowa Code 384.15A requires that municipalities adopt the maximum property tax levy for certain property tax levies for the budget year ending June 30, 2021; and Whereas, the Notice of Public Hearing - Proposed Property Tax Levy, Fiscal Year July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, was published on February 7, 2020 and posted in accordance with Iowa Code 384.15A; and Whereas, a public hearing on the proposed maximum property tax levy for certain property tax levies for the proposed budget ending June 30, 2021 was held on February 18, 2020, at a regularly scheduled City Council meeting and public comments were received; and Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: The proposed maximum property tax levy for certain property tax levies for the budget ending June 30, 2021 shall not exceed $53,930,125; 2. The combined increase in the maximum property tax levy for the applicable property tax levies is greater than 102% from the Fiscal Year 2020 certified property tax levy; and 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the filings required by law, and to set up the books in accordance with the summary and details, as adopted. RECENd and approved this 18th JOHNSON CO. I A FEB 2 7 2020 COUNTY AUt day of February 2020 13 k �roved by cA . z- 1d _--�U City Attorney's Office It was moved by ca1;t and seconded by Glein,r the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: X X X X NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Resolution No. 20-44 Page 2 flwdmVms amIbdgt-2020.doc Thomas Weiner T.'1.. PRESS -CITIZEN MEDIA PART Of TH E USA TODAY NETWORK CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 E WASHINGTON STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240-1825 AFFIDAVIT OF PIUBLICATION State of Wisconsin County of Brown, ss.: The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath, states that the Iowa City Press Citizen, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa, with its principal place of business In Iowa City, Iowa, the publisher of Iowa City Press Citizen newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, and that an advertisement, a printed copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" and made part of this affidavit, was printed and published in the Iowa City Press Citizen on the following dates: Ad No. Start Date: Run Dates: Cost: 6000065356 02/07/2020 02/07/2020 $124.99 Copy of Advertisement Exhibit "A" JO� ON Co.IOWA FEB 2 7 2020 COU-NTV °D1TflR '/ � 6 lal, I I_ ma, , " — Subs ribod and sworn to before me by said affiant this 27th day of February, 2020 2 `'A Notary Public q'mv awn ssicq 2y' pl'f-L f CITY NAME NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING -PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVY CITY CODE F52-483 Iowa Ci Fiscal Year Jul 1, 2020 - June 30 2021 The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed Fiscal Year City propertytax levy as follows: Meeting Date: Meeting Time: 1 Meeting Location: 2/18/2020 1 7:00 PM 410 E Washington St, City Hall At the public hearing any resident or taxpayer may present objections to, or arguments in favor of the proposed tax levy. After adoption of the proposed tax levy, the Council will publish notice and hold a hearing on the proposed city budget. City Web Site if available): icgov.org City Telephone Number: 319 356-5041 Current Year Budget Year Budget Year Proposed Annual Iowa Department of Management Certified Property Tax Effective Property Tax Maximum 2019/2020 2020/2021'* o Property Tax /o CHG 2020/2021 Regular Taxable Valuation 1 3,806,513,568 4,172,675,883 4,172,675,883 Tax Levies: Regular General 2 $30,832,760 $30,832,760 $33,798,675 Contract for Use of Bridge 3 $0 $0 $0 Opr & Maint Publicly Owned Transit 4 $3,616,188 $3,616,188 $3,964,042 Rent, Ins. Maint. Of Non -Owned Civ. Ctr. 5 $0 $0 $0 Opr & Maint of City -Owned Civic Center 6 $0 $0 $0 Planning a Sanitary Disposal Project 7 $0 $0 $0 Liability, Property & Self -Insurance Costs 8 $1,105,564 $1,105,564 $1,211,912 Support of Local Emer. Mgmt. Commission 9 $0 $0 $0 Emergency 10 $0 $0 $1,001,442 Police & Fire Retirement 11 $3,731,297 $3,731,297 $4,090,224 FICA & IPERS 12 $3,721,172 $3,721,172 $4,079,124 Other Employee Benefits 13 $4,896,4331 $4,896,4331 $5,784,706 *Total 384.15A Maximum Tax Levy 14 $47,903,414 $47,903,414 $53,930,125 12.58% Calculated 384.15A MaximumTax Rate 15 $12.58459 $11.48026 $12.92459 Explanation of significant increases in the budget: Significant increases in the budget are the result of several different City Council strategic initiatives, including the addition of permanent staff, an increase in temporary employee wages, maintaining Affordable Housing initiatives, and expanding Climate Change and social justice programs. Additionally, health insurance costs increased by 16% in fiscal year 2020 and are expected to increase another 10% in fiscal year 2021, and employee wages grew by approximately 4%. If applicable, the above notice also available online at: icgov.org *Total city tax rate will also include voted general fund levy, debt service levy, and capital improvement reserve levy "Budget year effective property tax rate is the rate that would be assessed for these levies if the dollars requested is not changed in the coming budget year Item Number: 14. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution Adopting the Social Justice and Racial Equity Grant Allocations for Fiscal Year 2020. Prepared By: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Sue Dulek, Assistant City Attorney Fiscal Impact: $75,000 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: By a vote of 8-0 the Human Rights Commission recommends for the City Council to provide full funding for the top six scoring applicants and partial funding for the top seventh applicant for the Social Justice and Racial Equity Grant for fiscal year 2020. Attachments: Draft Minutes HRC 1 21 00 Resolution Exhibit A Executive Summary: The Human Rights Commission recommends full funding for the top six scoring applicants: Successful Living, Little Creations Academy, Center for Worker Justice, Antelope Lending Library, Inside Out Reentry, and the Labor Center and partial funding for the top seventh applicant, the Sudanese Community Center, for the Social Justice and Racial Equity Grant for fiscal year 2020. Background /Analysis: In 2017, the City Council created the Social Justice and Racial Equity ("SJRE") Grant to assist community-based organizations in building capacity to address social justice and racial equity needs. Seventy-five thousand dollars has been allocated yearly for the SJRE Grant since fiscal year 2019. Social justice and racial equity are defined as "both a process and a goal. The goal is full and equal participation of all groups and individuals in a society that is mutually shaped to meet their needs, allow them to reach their full potential, and limit/decrease barriers. This definition includes a vision of society that is equitable, and where all members are physically and psychologically safe and secure." The grant is available to for-profit and non-profit Iowa City based organizations to fund programs, activities, or services that help eliminate inequities in the community. The grant lists six priority service areas: education, building community, housing, criminal justice, health, and employment. Organizations whose programs, services, or activities address one or more of these priorities are considered first for funding. Applications to apply for the grant for fiscal year 2020 were available from December 2, 2019 - January 3, 2020. The Human Rights Commission met on January 21 to review the sixteen funding requests. By a vote of 8-0 the Commission recommends to City Council to fund the below organizations. The total allocation is $75,000.00. Successful Living $18,000.00: Therapeutic and Cultural Activity Program that provides transportation to their clients to attend a wide variety of events at venues that charge admission. Funds will cover cost of admission fees and transportation for 150-200 persons over the year. Cultural excursions will further teach clients how to cope with new experiences and how to grow. Sudanese Community Center $13,520.00: Community Assistance Program for Sudanese Immigrants and their families, (CAPSI) will be conducted on a city-wide basis, as the current situation in the Sudanese Community is increasing dramatically. The program will assist Sudanese persons who in the community by providing assistance in three areas: education, health, and standard of living. Little Creations Academy $7,360.00: a series of four evening programs designed to engage and support parents in their role as their child's first teacher. Known as PATHS to Success (Parents and Teachers Helping Students), each of the four sessions will consist of a family meal, a focus on an academic and/or behavioral area, and an expectation that parents will apply the learned techniques at home. Materials will be supplied to the parents so they will have everything they need to engage with their child's learning. Center for Worker Justice $8,975.98: funds will be used for specific services and items of equipment to support the newly formed Center for Worker Justice Social Enterprise. This project is designed to create opportunities for economic independence for members with culinary skills through the creation of a cafe where they can cook, pass along culinary knowledge to future generations, and educate the larger community about diverse types of food. Antelope Lending Library $6,644.00: funding to start a large -print section in its Middle Grade and Young Adult sections which would include large -print multicultural titles. Recent studies have shown that large -print books—which are printed with a dyslexic friendly font—can assist children with ADHD, autism, and dyslexia. They have also found that most children and teens read 2 levels above where they were reading by reading large -print books. Inside Out Reentry $5,000.00: requesting funding for the second year to continue their program of hosting a quarterly forum series oriented around reentry, cultivating a supportive community for returning citizens, and offering educational and empowerment opportunities for returning citizens directly. The Labor Center $15,500.00: the Corridor Apprenticeship Opportunity Network will offer: 1) outreach and orientation workshops to connect members of underrepresented groups with high- quality job training opportunities, 2) two sessions of a new preparatory skills -based apprenticeship readiness course for Iowa City residents interested in qualifying for a registered apprenticeship, 3) direct connection of participants who complete the preapprentice program with eastern Iowa apprenticeship training coordinators, and 4) access to leadership development and peer support networks. FAA CTa:l►vil=11il,k&V Description Draft Minutes HRC 1 21 00 Resolution Exhibit A Draft Minutes Human Rights Commission City Hall, Helling Conference Room January 21, 2020 Members Present: Zachary Rochester, Bijou Maliabo, Mark Pries, Jessica Andino, Jason Glass, Adil Adams, Cathy McGinnis, Noemi Ford. Not Present: Ashley Lindley. Staff Present: Stefanie Bowers. Recommendation to Council: Yes, by a vote of 8-0 the Commission recommends to City Council funding the below organizations for the Social Justice and Racial Equity Grant as shown below for FY20. Successful Living $18,000.00 Sudanese Community Center $13, 520.00 Little Creations Academy $7,360.00 Center for Worker Justice $8,975.98 Antelope Lending Library $6,644.00 Inside Out Reentry Community $5,000.00 Labor Center $15,500.00 Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 5:31 PM. Approval of the January 7, 2020 meeting minutes: Rochester moved, and the motion was seconded by Glass. Motion carried 7-0. (Ford not present for vote). Black History Month Proclamation: Commissioner Glass will accept the proclamation at the February 4, City Council meeting on behalf of the Commission. Staff also gave an update on City programming for Black History Month. Social Justice and Racial Equity Grant Recommendation: Commissioner Glass ranked the top six scoring applications which totaled $61,000 out of $75,000 allocated for the grant. The top six include Successful Living, Little Creations Academy, Center for Worker Justice, Antelope Lending Library, Inside Out Reentry, and the Labor Center. Adding the seventh top ranked applicant (Sudanese Community Center) to the recommendation puts the amount at $1480.00 over the allocated amount. Commissioners reviewed the application for the Sudanese Community Center and noted it stated they would accept less funding. The eighth highest applicant (Gathering and Helping Hands) requested amount was $25,000 and it was an all or nothing proposal. Page 1 of 4 Because the Sudanese Community Center noted in the application that it would accept less funding to complete the project by doing less programming, the Commission decided to allocate $13,520.00 instead of the $15,000.00 to it. The Commission conditioned this on the Sudanese Community Center submitting an amended budget reflecting the $13,520.00. The Commission reviewed the top seven applications to determine whether the populations served adequately represented diverse groups and different populations. Commissioners gave brief remarks on why some applications did not score as high. Gathering and Helping Community: The amount was to purchase a vehicle. Some struggled with the large amount requested for a single purchase that may help a lot of people but was necessary for the project. Others had concerns with the cost of maintenance for the vehicle over time. Domestic Violence Intervention Program: The timeline did not fit with fiscal year 2020. The application should have been submitted in fiscal year 2019. Summer of the Arts: The event would occur after the grant cycle ended. African American Network of Iowa: The requested amount ($25,000) is to start the organization. Not a lot of programming mentioned in application. Healthcare Trends: The organization was not physically located in Iowa City and its mission statement was inconsistent with the proposal. ICC Fusion: The hotels should be investing the funding to provide cultural competency to its staff. Iowa City Pride: The scholarship that was mentioned in the proposal did not state how it would help LGBTQ people in Iowa City. Commissioner Glass moved to recommend the top six proposals for full funding and conditionally approve the seventh, pending resubmittal of its budget to $13,500 or less Priest seconded the motion. The motion passed 8-0. Youth Job Fair: March 6, the City along with Iowa Works and Vocational Rehabilitation will be hosting a youth job fair at the Robert A. Lee Recreational Center. Martin Luther King, Jr., Day of Service: Commissioners Rochester, Pries and Maliabo provided updates on the Day of Service and the program held at Bethel AME Church in celebration of the day. Page 2 of 4 Youth Awards: Save the date May 13, 2020. Human Rights Breakfast: Save the date October 21, 2020. Commission Announcements: Rochester visited the African American Museum of Iowa for the first time on MLK Day. Rochester also mentioned the upcoming Fair -Trade National Conference and how its principals align closely with the City's Climate Action Plan. Maliabo is part of Project Management Plus through the College of Public Health she assists mental health professional who are working with persons who have mental illness by offering translation services. The Project is charged by the University of Iowa's College of Law. Andino will be attending a conference in North Carolina in mid-February on Partnerships for Environmental Public Health. The University of Iowa has its annual Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity meeting from 5-6 PM at the IMU on January 22. On the 6th of February, Priest will be working with Agudas Achim Congregation to hold a CPR training for Congregation Coordinators. The hope is to get Iowa City & Coralville to be a Heart Safe Communities and get as many people as possible trained in CPR. McGinnis is looking forward to hearing from Dr. Anita Hill this coming Thursday as part of the University of Iowa's Lecture Series. Ford mentioned a play, The Agitators, that would be performed at the Riverside Theatre on January 24, 25, and 26.. Adjournment: Motion to adjourn at 6:31 PM. Page 3 of 4 Member Attendance Sheet Member Term 1/7 1/21 2/18 3/17 4/21 5/19 6/16 7/21 8/18 9/15 10/20 Maliabo 1/2021 Present Present McGinnis 1/2021 Present Present Rochester 1/2021 Present Present Adams 1/2022 Excused Present Andino 1/2022 Present Present Ford 1/2022 Present Present Lindley 1/2023 Present Excused Glass 1/2023 Present Present Pries 1/2023 Present I Present Page 4 of 4 Exhibit A Agency Request Recommendation Successful Living $18,000.00 $18,000.00 Sudanese Community Center $15,000.00 $13,520.00 Little Creations Academy $7,360.00 $7,360.00 Center for Worker Justice $8,975.98 $8,975.98 Antelope Lending Library 1 $6,644.00 $6,644.00 Inside Outreentry $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Labor Center $15,500.00 $15,500.00 Rankings for Social Justice and Racial Equity Grant Submissions FY 20 Organization Requested Amount Prior Recipient Average Rank Adil Jessica Noemi Jason Bijou Cathy Mark Zachary #60 Successful Living $18,000 No 6.75 6 1 8 30 5 8 5 11 6 #61 Sudanese Community Center $15,000 No 7.125 7 3 30 13 3 5 4 9 30 #62 Gathering and Helping Community $25,000.00 No 7.5 8 4 11 1 7 10 6 8 13 #63 Little Creations Academy $7,360.00 No 5.625 4 5 $2 2 2 14 3 6 11 #64 Multicultural Development Center of Iowa $7,500.00 No 8.375 9 6 6 12 8 11 8 7 9 #66 Food Pantry at Iowa $10,000.00 No 10.875 11 7 7 15 12 12 30 12 12 #67 Center for Worker Justice $8,975.98 Yes 5.875 5 8 3 9 10 2 9 2 4 #68 Iowa City Pride $5,000.00 No 11.625 14 9 13 11 9 9 14 14 14 #69 Antelope Lending Library $6,644.00 No 4.875 2 30 4 4 1 13 1 1 5 #70 Inside Out Reentry Community $5,000.00 Yes 5.25 3 11 5 5 13 1 2 4 1 #71 Domestic Violence Intervention Program $5,700.00 No 11.125 12 12 16 6 14 3 15 16 7 #72 ICC Fusion $13,000.00 No 13.5 16 13 14 14 11 16 11 13 16 #73 Summer of the Arts $10,000.00 No 11.375 13 14 12 7 15 6 12 10 15 #74 Healthcare Trends $8,855.66 No 9.5 10 15 9 8 6 15 16 5 2 #75 African Communities Network of Iowa $25,000.00 No 13.25 15 16 15 16 16 7 13 15 8 #76 Labor Center $15,500.00 Yes 3.375 1 2 1 3 4 4 7 3 3 Total $186,536 Funds available $75,000.00 Prepared by: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356- 5022 Resolution NO. 20-45 Resolution Adopting the Social Justice and Racial Equity Grant Allocations for Fiscal Year 2020. Whereas the City Council approved funding in the fiscal year 2020 budget for Social Justice and Racial Equity ("SJRE") Grants for community-based organizations to build capacity to address social justice and racial equity; and Whereas, the City has disseminated the SJRE Grant applications to Iowa City organizations; and Whereas, the City has received 16 applications for the SJRE Grant for fiscal year 2020; and Whereas, the Human Rights Commission held a meeting to discuss and review applications regarding the allocation of funds for the SJRE Grant for fiscal year 2020; and Whereas, the Human Rights Commission has recommended that Exhibit A be approved; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the public interest will be served by the adoption of the fiscal year 2020 SJRE Grant allocations. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The allocation of fiscal year 2020 SJRE Grant funds attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby approved and adopted. 2. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to execute, terminate, or amend SJRE Grant agreements executed in connection with the allocation of public funds. Passed and approved this i Rrh day of Fehr,iary , 2020. /CA MAYOR ATTEST Approved by: City Attorney's Office i3 do S� Resolution No. Page 2 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Thomas the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: x x x x X x ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Exhibit A Agency Request Recommendation Successful Living $18,000.00 $18,000.00 Sudanese Community Center $15,000.00 $13,520.00 Little Creations Academy $7,360.00 $7,360.00 Center for Worker Justice $8,975.98 $8,975.98 Antelope Lending Library $6,644.00 $6,644.00 Inside Outreentry $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Labor Center $15,500.00 $15,500.00 Item Number: 15. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT February 18, 2020 Resolution adopting an assessment schedule for unpaid mowing charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Prepared By: Susan Dulek, Ass't. City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Tracy Hightshoe, NDS Director Stan Laverman, Sr. Housing Inspector Fiscal Impact: none Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Notice and photographs Resolution Exhibits A and B Executive Summary: State law allows the City Council by resolution to assess properties for unpaid mowing charges, snow removal, and other nuisance related expenses, which the City did most recently at the Feb. 4 Council meeting. At that meeting, the tenant for 213 W. Benton St. appeared regarding the proposed assessment. As a result, 213 W. Benton was removed from the list of properties assessed in order for additional information to be provided. Background /Analysis: Following an anonymous complaint regarding tall grass and weeds on 213 W. Benton St. received on Friday, July 26, an inspector inspected the property on July 30. The inspector provided a notice of violation to the tenant in person and mailed a notice of violation to the owner. The notice instructed the owner to cut the weeds/tall grass and remove the volunteer trees. The inspector reinspected the property on August 8. Because the tall grass/weeds and volunteer trees had not been cut, the inspector ordered the City's contractor to do so. On August 14, the contractor spent over four hours removing the volunteer trees and other vegetation. Attached are the following supporting documents: a) Activities Report; b) Notice of Violation; c) before and after photos (note that one photo has an address of 811 Orchard, the property to the rear of 205 W. Benton; the 205 W. Benton property is shown in the foreground of that photo); and d) invoice from contractor. This resolution will assess 213 W. Benton St. for $264.64, the cost incurred for removal of weeds, volunteer trees, and other nuisance vegetation plus the administrative fee. The City has billed the property owner three times and has not received payment. ATTACHMENTS: Description Notice and photographs Resolution Exhibit A Exhibit B Activities for Case # : COM19-02037 Printed on 2/6/2020 at 2:55PM 213 W BENTON ST Description Date 1 Date 2 Date 3 Done By Disp Notes (F) create WEED RECEIPTS 8/14/2019 SML DONE Re -inspection 7/31/2019 8/7/2019 818!2019 JOS FAIL (F) Send WEED NOTICE 7/31/2019 JOS DONE Initial inspection 7/30/2019 JOS FAIL Observed tall grass/weeds and lots of volunteer thlstles/trees/weeds around the entire property. Was able to view the backyard from next door neighbors property. Contact owner/post property 7/30/2019 JOS DONE Gave notice to tenant. Complaint received 7/26/2019 WEB DONE ICGovExpress Case Number: 20968 - Tall Grass & Weeds Page 1 of 1 NOTICE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR FIRST VIOLATION OF WEED ORDINANCE DATE: July 31, 2019 LIGHT RIDGE LLC PO BOX 5203 CORALVILLE, IA 52241-0203 Case #: COM19-02037 Location of Violation: 213 W BENTON ST Dear Property Owner: CITY OF IOWA CITY According to the records of the tax assessor, you are the owner of the above -referenced property. On 713012019, 1 observed an apparent violation of the City Code of Iowa City on your property. Type of Violation: 6-1-2C & 6-3-2B - TALL GRASS AND WEEDS Corrective Action Required: MAINTAIN GRASS/WEEDS UNDER 10 INCHES IN HEIGHT. REMOVE ALL VOLUNTEER THISTLESITREESNEGETATIONIWEEDS FROM AROUND THE HOUSE/GARAGE AND ENTIRE YARD. DISPOSE OF YARD DEBRIS PROPERLY. This violation must be abated (corrected) on or before 81712019. Section 6-3-2 of the City Code requires that grasses and weeds be maintained at a height less than ten (10") inches. If this violation is not corrected on or before 81712019, the City will undertake abatement (correction) of the violation and the cost will be assessed against this property in the same manner as property taxes pursuant to Iowa Code 364.12(3)(h) and City Code 6-1-4. Should you wish to contest this notice, you must submit a written petition requesting an administrative hearing. Such petition must be received in the office of the City Clerk within seven (7) days of the date of service or mailing of this notice. Failure to timely request a hearing shall consitute a waiver of the right to a hearing, and this notice shall become a final determination and order. NOTE : For subsequent violations of the weed ordinance during this calendar year, you will only have three (3) calendar days from the date of the subsequent "Notice For Corrective Action For Second and Subsequent Violation of Weed Ordinance" to abate (correct) the violation and the same property tax assessment may follow as described above. If you wish to discuss any aspect of this order, please call me at 319-356-5129. Sincerely, Joan Siders �f HOUSING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT ell lC M* com weed.Mt �, ,.fir •�• t;-•�J 1 ., -- - - , . - e.•.- .� :rte. 10 br 42 70t� - K. ' -' �'{k ,r'iT_ ,5�'xt ~i•`%r54 A. V'. CP of 41 'S 1� -- 44 .�;t'><- � .�', •• �r- v 151 ��,y�Ir, Y' I��[�y�{^ �rl�'hr 'I. ,+ r' ' .+1 Ill ::nat �• t' �S }A .ra.. �F 'r tr .�. t� �#d."ri : ♦y � i'.�1�•� ..y. ,F J-�� • 1 I S}', r t it #, }t -I R ry • a {: � ; , 2019 - t 2.41.3 P I � I PRO5 VIS Penton S Iowa City4.�22416 Unfi& States gift � I 4 F w t w jW d e 44 74 ep 1p, It AIV AL 401M A MOW 4f Vl zu-I V_ at 0• �1 ty:ljz m 811. Orchard S ,wa City A 5224E ''United States m d w jr iov j e p Rr P. a 'VA .__ wo JTW - - w 40 d 4 AL % .4ift L: OL Jp;jL dp 11 t 1 n4 % 41 e _ i 'e nton S 6a City A 5224( United Sta tet. � . �. . I ! _ 0 Extreme Green Landscaping LLC hftp:/twww.extremegreenlic.com/ INVOICE BILL TO City of Iowa City Iowa City City Hall Purchasing Division 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, la 52240 Johnson DESCRIPTION Service 8114/19 213 W Benton St. Iowa City IA Remove and trim volunteer trees and vegetation from property Make payments to: Extreme Green Landscaping LLC P.O. Box 344 Alburnett, IA 52202 INVOICE # 1975 DATE 09/15/2019 DUE DATE 09/30/2019 TERMS Net 15 QTY RATE AMOUNT 4 41.16 164.64T SUBTOTAL 164.64 TAX 0.00 TOTAL 164.64 BALANCE DUE $164.64 is. DEFEATED Prepared by: Kellie Fruehling, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240-319-356-5040 RESOLUTION NO. Resolution adopting an assessment schedule for unpaid mowing charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Whereas, the City Clerk has filed with the City Clerk an assessment schedule providing the amount to be assessed against a certain lot for the actual unpaid abatement costs of mowing in the same manner as property taxes; Whereas, said schedule is attached as Exhibit A to this resolution and incorporated herein by this reference; Whereas, Iowa Code § 364.136 authorizes the City Council to assess against the property said abatement costs in the same manner as property taxes; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the property owner listed in Exhibit A has received a written notice of the date and time of the public hearing on the adoption of said assessment schedule, in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit B. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Exhibit A is adopted as the final assessment schedule pursuant to Iowa Code § 384.60(1). The amount listed in Exhibit A for unpaid mowing charges is confirmed and levied against the property listed in Exhibit A. All unpaid assessments not paid within thirty (30) days after the first publication of the final assessment schedule shall bear interest at the rate of 9% per annum, commencing on April 2, 2020. Assessments are payable at Johnson Country Treasurer, 13 South Dubuque Street, Iowa City, Iowa. Until April 1, 2020 payment may be made at the City Clerk, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa. The City Clerk is hereby directed to certify the schedule as set out in Exhibit A to the Treasurer of Johnson County, Iowa for collection in the same manner as property taxes. The assessment cannot be paid in installments. The City Clerk is further directed to publish notice of the schedule once each week for two consecutive weeks in the manner provided in Iowa Code § 362.3, the first publication of which shall be not more than fifteen (15) days from the date of filing of the final assessment schedule. Passed and approved this 18th day of February _,2020 ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Approved by 0)'l( olCd City Attorney's Office It was moved by mi.. and seconded by c,, ;, the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there was: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X_ Bergus x Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas x Weiner EXHIBIT A CRY OF IOWA CRY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Frozen Meters • Water Lien PropertyAddress Legal Description Parcel Number Appml"d Valw Date of pmporty Owner Services) Rendered Services) Cost of Service Invoice Balance a Outstanding 213 W BENTON ST LIGHT MIDGE LLC 3016193003 153900.00 Ll(ifT RIDGE LLC Weed Rennoval 8/19/2019 E 259.69 71905 S 269.69 Exhibit B February 11, 2020 «Property_Owner» sMailing_Address» «City», «State» «ZIP» Dear Property Owner: CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa $2240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3191 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org This is to notify you that the City Council will be considering a resolution on February 18, 2020 that will assess against your property the cost that the City has incurred to do one of the following: unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, or stop box repair charges. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the bill. If the City Council approves the assessment against your property, the amount will be collected by the Johnson County Treasurer in the same manner as a property tax. The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 pm and is held at Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, Iowa. If you want to challenge the assessment, you are advised to come to the City Council meeting. You may also submit a letter or email to the City Council. The mailing address is: City Council, % City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 and the email address is council(cDiowa-citv.oro Please note that all communication with City Council is a public record. If you pay the amount due in full before the City Council meeting, the resolution will not include an assessment against your property. You can make the payment by mailing or coming in person to the City Clerk's office, 410 East Washington Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. If property is assessed and the amount is not paid within the specified 30 days, interest will accrue at a rate set by the City Council. If you have any questions about the resolution, please contact my office at 356-5041. Sincerely, Kellie Fruehling City Clerk Enc. Copy to: Accounting Division-w/enc.