Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
HPC Agenda packet 11.12.2020
Thursday November 12, 2020 5:30 p.m. Electronic Zoom Meeting Platform IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, November 12, 2020 Electronic Meeting – 5:30 p.m. Zoom Meeting Platform Agenda A) Call to Order B) Roll Call C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda D) Certificate of Appropriateness 1. 109 East College Street, 111-113 East College Street, 115 East College Street, 117-123 East College Street and 125-127 East College Street – Local Historic Landmark (demolition of rear structures, alteration of storefront, rehabilitation of façade, and new addition) E) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff Certificate of No Material Effect –Chair and Staff review 1. 620 Oakland Avenue – Longfellow Historic District (storm damage repair to porch and roof) 2. 622 North Van Buren Street – Brown Street Historic District (rear deck railing repair) 3. 220 North Lucas Street – Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District (garage repair) 4. 426 Church Street – Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District (storm window product approval) 5. 935 East College Street – Local Historic Landmark (front porch repair) Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8) An electronic meeting is being held because a meeting in person is impossible or impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members, staff and the public presented by COVID-19. You can participate in the meeting and can comment on an agenda item by going to https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJUqdOmspz8jEtXFsaL16Napz01ZzCiigFvY to visit the Zoom meeting’s registration page and submitting the required information. Once approved, you will receive an email message with a link to join the meeting. If you are asked for a meeting or webinar ID, enter the ID number found in the email. If you have no computer or smartphone, or a computer without a microphone, you can call in by phone by dialing (312) 626-6799 and entering the meeting ID 917 3049 4981 when prompted. Providing comment in person is not an option. Minor Review –Staff review 1. 426 Church Street – Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District (porch floor repair and stair railing replacement) 2. 112 South Governor – College Hill Conservation District (skylight installation- providing roof egress access) 3. 1177 East Court Street – Longfellow Historic District (solar panel installation) 4. 320 East College Street, Trinity Episcopal Church – Local Historic Landmark (modern window replacement) 5. 214 East Jefferson Street – Jefferson Street Historic District (roof shingle replacement) 6. 533 South Summit Street – Summit Street Historic District (damaged window replacement) 7. 721 Grant Street – Longfellow Historic District (basement egress window and window well) 8. 1527 Muscatine Avenue – Dearborn Street Conservation District (window repair and replacement and rear stair replacement) F) Consideration of Minutes for October 8, 2020 G) Commission Discussion 1. Correspondence from William Means 2. Past/Forward Conference H) Commission Information I) Adjournment If you will need disability-related accommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact Jessica Bristow, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5243 or at jessica-bristow@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs. Staff Report Novmeber 4, 2020 Historic Review for 109 East College Street, 111-113 East College Street, 115 East College Street, 117-123 East College Street, and 125-127 East College Street District: Central Business Classification: Local Historic Landmarks (in-process, with the exception of 125-127 East College which is an existing local landmark) The applicant, the Tailwind Group, is requesting approval for a proposed demolition, alteration, and new addition project at 109 East College Street, 111-113 East College Street, 115 East College Street, 117-123 East College Street and 125-127 East College Street, in process for local historic landmark designation with the exception of the existing Local Landmark at 125-127 East College. All are located in the Downtown or Central Business District. The project consists of the following: • Demolition of historic rear additions for portions of all buildings with the exception of 109 East College, and • Limited rehabilitation and alteration of the historic building facades including the replacement of the storefront in the east half of the Crescent Block, the replacement of the second-floor windows above this storefront and limited alteration to the main building entrance. Some missing elements of the Sears Building will also be reconstructed, and • The construction of a rear multifamily and parking tower addition along the back alley Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.3 Doors 4.8 Masonry 4.13 Windows 5.0 Guidelines for Additions 5.1 Expansion of Building Footprint 7.0 Guidelines for Demolition 7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures or Significant Features 9.0 Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Buildings 9.1 Site Elements 9.2 Architectural Elements 10 .0 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Staff Comments Existing Building Information Several of the buildings are separate brick commercial buildings considered key contributing buildings in the Iowa City Downtown Historic District currently nominated to the National Register and in process for local landmark overlay rezoning having passed unanimously through the first reading by City Council. • 109 East College Street (see Fig. 1, attachment 1): The Dooley Block was a 4-bay, 2-story brick building built beginning in ca. 1874 with this bay. In 1929, the middle two bays were razed for the construction of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building. The west bay, at 109 College, is one of the outer bays of the original building that remains and extends the full depth of the lot. This bay has functioned as an autonomous building since 1929. The building façade includes a mixture of Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate details. At the lower level, the transom was remodeled with the addition of prism glass prior to 1940, the sign band was removed or altered and the store front has been more recently updated. • 111-113 East College Street (see Fig. 2, attachment 1): The Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building was built in 1929, from central two bays of the flanking Dooley Block. This building style is commonly known as the Commercial Brick Front and is a 3-bay 2-story building filling the entire lot. The upper level includes a Chicago style window in each bay with a continuous terra cotta sill. Terra cotta detailing is also found in the coping on the stepped parapet, as stylized pilasters between the windows and as decorative accents in the brickwork above. The storefront today has been remodeled with entrances in the outer bays flanking the central display window and detailed in stone with a Classical Revival influence. • 115 East College Street (see Fig. 3, attachment 1): The Dooley Block was a 4-bay, 2-story brick building built beginning in ca. 1874 and concluding with the construction of this bay between 1892 and 1899. In 1929, the middle two bays were razed for the construction of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building. The east bay at 115 College is one of the outer bays of the original building that remains and extends for much of the depth of the lot. This bay has also functioned as an autonomous building since 1929. Like the west bay, the building façade includes a mixture of Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate details. At the lower level, the storefront had been remodeled prior to 2001 to include a series of moldings separating the storefront from the upper story and an entrance to the east side of a modified shop window. Since 2001 the storefront has again been altered, replacing the shop window with four full-glass doors which fold back to open the entire front of the lower level. • 117-123 East College Street (see Fig. 4, attachment 1): The Crescent Block was built in 1894 as a 4- bay 3-story Commercial Brick Front building. Originally three larger bays housed storefronts and the smaller bay at 119 served as the entrance to the upper floors. This entry bay was remodeled in the 1930s with Carrara glass in an Art Deco styling to include a small storefront and the stairs to the upper level. The design includes a curved glass display window and the original wood and glass entrance door and tile floor. The west bay retains the original storefront treatment. The east half of the building was remodeled into a single modern storefront with new brick and an exposed aggregate facing above the individual windows and curved awnings. The first floor projects forward and includes a shallow standing seam roof that separates the storefront-level from the upper levels. At the third floor, the windows are tall, paired double-hung windows centered over each bay. Each pair has a thick stone lintel and two thinner sills. At the second floor, the east-most windows were replaced with large Chicago-style windows and the west include alternating pairs and individual windows of two different sizes. A tall, pressed metal cornice includes a rhythm of large and small brackets. In 1929, the building was occupied by Montgomery Ward who built a farm and home store addition at the back of the lot. The building at 125-127 East College Street (see Fig. 5, attachment 1), the College Block Building, is an existing local historic landmark built in 1883 by architect Chauncey F Lovelace as a two-bay, two-story brick commercial building with elaborate tin window hoods and decorative cornice. In 2006, the Commission approved storm damage repair to the building. In 2015, repairs to tin and wood elements and masonry pointing was approved. Project Description Demolition The applicant is proposing several demolitions to the rear of some of the properties (For drawings, see pages AD-001, AD100, AD101, AD102, AD103, and AD201 of attachment 2). • 111-113 East College, The Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building (see Fig. 6, attachment 1): the rear portion of the building at a point that roughly aligns with the rear wall of the property to the east, 115 E College. • 115 E College, East bay Dooley Block (see Fig. 7, attachment 1): a single-story addition built after 1948 and a rear stairway • 117-123 E College, Crescent Block building (see Figs. 8 & 9, attachment 1): a 1929 two-story addition known as the Montgomery Ward Farm Store, a one-story addition that was a machine shop and then a furniture warehouse that was constructed prior to 1933, a cellar door entrance, and the fire escape • 125-127 E College, College Block building (see Fig. 10, attachment 1): a single-story rear addition that was constructed between 1933 and 1948 and a metal stair and railing Alteration and Rehabilitation The applicant is proposing to rehabilitate or alter several places on the front and rear of each building. Front Alterations and Rehabilitation (see drawing C1, page AD201, drawing B1, page A-201 and page A-901, attachment 2): • 109 East College, West bay Dooley Block: wood elements will be painted. • 111-113 East College, The Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building: missing or damaged terracotta elements will be repaired or recreated to match existing and some masonry will be pointed where there are open joints. • 115 E College, East bay Dooley Block: wood elements will be painted • 117-123 E College, Crescent Block building: At the west bay, the wood door will be refinished, and the metal window frames painted. At the “Soap Opera” entry, which will become a main access point for the upper levels, the entry tile floor will be replaced, the signage for “Revival” will be removed, the main entry door will be refinished and moved outward from its current location to provide an accessible entry. The secondary entry door to the west will be removed (See also pages AD101 and A-101, attachment 2). At the east bay of the building, the entire first floor storefront and knee wall will be removed with existing columns remaining. They will be replaced with a cast stone base, and a storefront system whose horizontal division aligns with the transom in the west bay. The missing mid-level cornice will not be reconstructed but will become a sign band. The second-floor windows will be replaced with new Chicago-style windows. • 125-127 E College, College Block building: architectural elements will be cleaned and repainted as needed Rear Alterations (see drawing A1, page AD201, drawing A1, page A-201, attachment 2): • 109 East College, West bay, Dooley Block: a rear door will be removed, the roof will be replaced and the top edge of the existing wall adjacent to the new addition will be removed (see page AD103, attachment 2) • 111-113 East College, The Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building: the new rear wall of this building will include a second-floor row of individual windows appearing similar to other second floor windows in the project and aligned horizontally with them • 115 E College, East bay Dooley Block: a rear door on the second floor will be replaced and become a Juliet balcony • 117-123 E College, Crescent Block building: two second-floor windows will be replaced, one third- floor door will be replaced with a window, six third floor windows will be replaced, six windows will be added (or exposed and then replaced) on the second floor to align with the windows above. At the first floor a door will be altered, and several other doors will be added (or exposed and then replaced) Ivy will also be removed from this building • 125-127 E College, College Block building: a new wood-framed window will be installed in the location of the demolition to mimic the adjacent entry door, a second-floor rear door that may have originally been a window will be replaced and become a Juliet balcony. New Addition The applicant is proposing to construct a multi-family building with parking below across the rear portion of all properties except 109 E College Street (see attachment 3). The building will have a two-story parking garage, and nine floors of residential housing with roof-access stair enclosure above (see page G-002, attachment 3). The façade will be arranged in vertical strips demarcated by the regular spacing of the windows at dark metal panels above and/or below them (see pages A-201 and A-202, attachment 3). A slight horizontal division between every second floor appears to be created through sheet metal flashing. The top two floors will be further demarcated by a dark metal cladding. The majority of the building will be clad in painted or weathering steel. The main circulation core will be at the east end of the building adjacent to the Graduate Hotel with a secondary circulation stair on the west end (see page A-203, attachment 3). The parking garage will be clad in darkened concrete that will blend with the color of the steel above. This addition will be separated from the remaining portions of the historic buildings by a courtyard that is 10 feet wide at the narrowest and 20 feet wide at the widest (see page C-101, attachment 3). Guideline Review Demolition Section 7.0 Demolition, states that the demolition of any portion of a building requires Commission approval. While the guidelines do not include a recommendation for the demolition of historic additions on the rear of primary buildings, the section states that for the demolition of any outbuilding, the Commission will consider the condition, integrity and architectural significance of the outbuilding. In Section 10, Standard 2 reads, the historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. Standard 4 reads, most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. Alteration and Rehabilitation Section 4.3 Doors, of the guidelines states that the original size and shape of door openings should be maintained. Any new door openings should be trimmed to match other doors and windows in the building. Section 4.8 Masonry recommends repairing historic masonry, using hand tools to remove deteriorated mortar and replacing deteriorated masonry units with ones that appear similar to the existing masonry units in color, texture and size, and that have an appropriate hardness. Additionally, new mortar joints should match the dimension of the original joints which are often narrower than those commonly used today. It is disallowed to clean masonry with blasting techniques and to paint historic masonry that has not been painted. Section 4.13 Windows states that windows are one of the most important elements that define a building’s architectural character. It is therefore recommended that historic windows are preserved by repairing sashes and frames and replacing badly deteriorated window sashes, instead of whole windows, with new sashes that match the historic ones. When adding new windows, they should match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of divided lites and overall appearance of the historic windows. They should also be added in a location that is consistent with the window pattern of the historic building. If an existing window is to be closed on a brick structure, it should be recessed to express the original opening and lintels and sills should be maintained. When entire windows should be replaced, the new ones should match the historic ones and be constructed of wood or metal clad wood. Typically, sashes are black. Storm windows are necessary with historic windows to create an energy efficient system. New storms should fit the window exactly without the use of spacers. Section 10 of the guidelines, in addition to the Standards listed above, includes Standard 6 which reads, deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical or pictorial evidence. Standard 9 reads, new additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. New Addition In Section 5.1, the guidelines discuss the expansion of the building footprint focusing on residential additions. Several of the guidelines could still be considered relevant to this project. An addition should be designed so that it does not diminish the character of the historic structure and is distinguished from the historic structure often by offsetting walls of the addition from the walls of the original structure or by connecting them with a breezeway (or hyphen). Key horizontal lines on the existing building should be matched to provide continuity between the addition and historic structure. The palette of materials should be similar to that used on the historic structure. Additions should be placed at the rear of the property if possible. Additions should be constructed that are consistent with the massing and roofline of the historic building. Siding, windows, and doors should all be similar to the existing structure. An exception exists for modern windows to be used in setback additions provided that they have overall proportions comparable to those found in the historic building. Section 9.0, Design Guidelines for Multi-family Buildings, includes some direction for projects such as this. Buildings must have at least one door on the exterior of the building that provides pedestrian access to dwelling units within the building. A pedestrian circulation system must be provided that connects residential entrances to adjacent public rights-of-way, and to parking areas and other on-site facilities. The “front” of the building must have at least one main entrance to the building and orientation of the “front” of the building must be to the street or interior courtyard in a manner similar to existing buildings in the neighborhood. Parking lots must not be located between the principle building and the street. Parking must be located behind a building, below grade, or under a building. Where parking is located below a building, any exposed portions of the exterior walls of the parking area visible from a street must appear to be a component of the facade of the building. The use of similar building materials, window openings, and providing facade detailing similar to the upper levels are examples of how this can be achieved. In no case shall a building have the appearance from the street of being elevated above a parking level, or “on stilts.” In addition, measures should be incorporated into the design of a new building that help to reduce its “visual mass” and overall height. In historic and conservation districts the width of the front façade of new buildings must not exceed 40 feet unless the horizontal plane of any street-facing façade of the building is broken into modules that give the appearance of smaller, individual buildings. Each module must meet the following standards: 1. Each module must be no greater than 30 feet and no less than 10 feet in width and must be distinguished from adjacent modules by a variation in the wall plane of at least 16 inches in depth. For buildings that are 3 or more stories in height, the width of the module may be increased to 40 feet. 2. Each module must have a corresponding change in the roofline. 3. Each module must be distinguished from the adjacent module by at least one of the following means: a) Variation in Material colors, types or textures; b) Variation in the building and/or parapet height Section 10 of the guidelines includes Standards relevant to the new addition portion of the project. In addition to the standards listed above in the previous two sections (2, 4, 6, and 9), Standard 10 reads, new additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. The National Park Service has developed “Preservation Brief 14, New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings: Preservation Concerns” for direction on how to apply the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards to potential projects. This brief is included as an attachment (see attachment 4). Staff Evaluation Demolition Regarding the rear demolitions, staff finds that the rear demolition of the Sears building would not commonly be allowed by the guidelines because it is historic and a portion of the existing building which does not appear deteriorated to allow demolition. An exception is necessary to approve this portion of the project. Staff finds that the rear addition to the East bay of the Dooley Block is not historic and demolition of this addition is acceptable. The rear portion of the Crescent Block is a historic addition that has acquired historic significance. An exception is also necessary to approve this portion of the project. Staff finds that the demolition of the rear addition of the College Block building is acceptable and will not impact the historic character of the building despite its historic construction. Alteration and Rehabilitation The rehabilitation work on the building includes the replacement of several historic windows on the rear of the historic buildings. Because only a portion of the windows are proposed for replacement, staff assumes that those being replaced are beyond repair. Staff recommends that the Commission require confirmation of the reason for select window replacement. The rear doors do not appear to be original but would otherwise suggest confirmation of their condition as well. An effort has been made to mimic the existing doors and windows in the new windows that are added to the rear of the buildings following the demolition. There are some areas where it is unclear to staff whether the windows and doors are existing and will be newly exposed by the demolition or are new openings. Staff finds that the locations and configurations of the new rear openings are appropriate. The façade rehabilitation work includes the appropriate painting of the wood elements of the historic building. Staff reminds the applicant that no pressure washing of historic masonry or wood should ever be completed. Any pressure greater than that created by a thumb over a hose end will potentially damage these materials. Correct moisture content of the wood, oil-based primers, and at least two topcoats are recommended for a long-lasting paint application on bare wood. The replacement of missing or broken terracotta from the façade of the Sears building is appropriate given the ability to match remaining elements. The pointing of all masonry should ensure that proper mortar is used to prevent damage to historic masonry and that excess mortar should be quickly removed from the face as soon as it occurs. Staff appreciates the ability to retain the historic alteration known as the “Soap Opera” entry because it has acquired historic significance. Returning this entry to its role as the main entry to the building is an appropriate step in utilizing the upper floors of the building. Staff also finds the limited alteration of relocating the existing door forward and removing the adjacent door and wall appropriate actions to increase accessibility of this entry. Staff questions the need to replace the tile entry at this location and recommends confirmation of its deterioration and the ability of the new tile to match the existing. The replacement of the second-floor windows in the east bay of the Crescent Block is appropriate because the existing windows are deteriorated and not the original Chicago-style windows. New metal clad wood windows in a Chicago-style configuration are appropriate. The replacement of the existing storefront in this bay is appropriate because it is non-historic and detracts from the historic character of the existing building. The cast stone base may proportionally mimic the wood base on the west bay. The new store front consists of vertical divisions and a horizontal division that mimics the west bay. Otherwise, the storefront is a modern flat storefront. Staff recommends recessed entry doors to create a greater sense of the rhythm of the façade, protect occupants, as they enter, and reflect the traditional historic storefront as well as the Montgomery Ward Storefront (See Fig. 11, attachment 1). Staff finds that the location and setback of the proposed addition (in contact with the rear portion of the West Bay of the Dooley Block), goes far in the effort to minimize the scale of the building. The addition will only be minimally visible from the College Street portion of the pedestrian mall. This location also successfully differentiates the building from the historic buildings. No other differentiation is needed. Staff finds that the weathered steel material has a tactile quality that in combination with its color, reflects the historic brick and tile construction, especially where brick construction is not feasible. While it was determined that the block-like form of the building without changes to the façade or height are necessary to make the project viable. Staff finds that this is not appropriate according to the guidelines and that an exception is necessary for approval. The horizontal quality of a historic downtown buildings is not reflected in this façade and verticality is emphasized instead. During the October 8, 2020 meeting where this project was informally reviewed, the Commission was consulted on their ability to approve elements of the project which may not align with the goals of the guidelines. The demolition of the back half of the Sears building and the demolition of the Montgomery Ward Farm store on the back of the Crescent Block to make room for the addition are one portion of this project where the Commission may find that an exception to the guidelines is necessary for approval. Concerning the new addition, several elements likely require an exception for approval, including the height, exterior cladding and the more modern design aesthetic of the addition. Staff finds that an exception for an uncommon situation would be appropriate for this project (Section 3.2 of the guidelines). This exception allows for alternative design solutions to the guidelines to be considered by the Commission. The intent in considering alternative designs is to allow architectural flexibility in exceptional circumstances such as non-compliant structures, irregular lots, and projects which satisfy the intent of the guidelines as interpreted by the Commission. Staff finds that the lots in question are significant historic properties in the Iowa City Downtown (especially when considered as a group) and facing extreme development pressure. Only the College Block building has been protected through Local Landmark designation prior to this project. The ability to access parking off the alley as well as the location on the outer edge of the proposed Downtown National Register Historic District provides for the development of the rear half of the lot and construction of a larger tower without impacting the neighborhood and site lines from within the neighborhood. Additionally, the setback and limited site-lines to the building will greatly lessen the impact of the single large building form and vertical emphasis in the façade, by providing the impression that the building exists outside the historic area even though it does not. These elements will be fully visible from outside the historic area where their impact is minimal. This situation is uncommon because all of these factors do not appear to exist for other properties in the downtown historic area. For these reasons staff recommends that the Commission utilize an exception for uncommon situations in their discussion of the project approval. Unlike some recent projects the Commission has approved that include modern towers that extend onto a landmark property, this addition is fully within the landmark property. It should be fully reviewed by the Commission as an addition to a historic building. Staff recommends approval of this rehabilitation and alteration project including the associated demolitions and the new addition with conditions. It should be noted that no signage is reviewed or approved as part of this project and only portions of the project discussed and reviewed by the Commission are part of the approval. Any changes or additional elements of the project would need to be approved on an individual basis. Recommended Motion Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 109 East College Street, 111-113 East College Street, 115 East College Street, 117-123 East College Street and 125-127 East College Street as presented in the application through the use of an exception to the guidelines for the uncommon situation occurring with this project. The uncommon situation is described as the significance of these properties, both individually and as a group, their location on the outer edge of the proposed historic district, their ability to provide parking accessed from the alley and hidden from view, and the ability to provide a setback addition. The project approval would include the following conditions: The local landmark overlay zoning for all included buildings will be complete prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness Rear window and door condition is documented prior to replacement The condition of the tile entry at the Crescent Block is documented and any new tile matches the existing The new storefront at the Crescent Block is revised with recessed entries. Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 1, 109 East College, West bay, Dooley Block Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 2, 111-113 East College, Sears, Roebuck & Co. buiding Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 3, 115 East College, East bay Dooley Black Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 4, 117-123 East College, Crescent Block Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 5, 123-125 East College, College Block Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 6, 111-113 E College, rear demolitions Figure 7, 115 East College, rear demolitions Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 8, 117-123 East College, rear demolitions Figure 9, 117-123 East College, rear demolitions Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 10, 125-127 East College, rear demolitions Attachment 1: staff report images Figure 11, 100 Block College Street, 1965 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 INDEX OF DRAWINGS ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4VICINITY MAP G-001 TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION 109-127 E. College St., Iowa City, IA HPC Submission10/23/2020 A-201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-221 ENLARGED STAIR/ELEVATOR & SECTIONS A-211 BUILDING SECTIONS A-222 ENLARGED STAIRS & SECTIONS A-301 WALL SECTIONS A-401 ENLARGED PLANS A-402 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-403 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-404 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-501 DETAILS A-601 DOOR SCHEDULES AND FRAME TYPES A-901 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PHOTOS GENERAL INFORMATION DRAWINGS G-001 TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX G-002 CODE INFORMATION STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS S-001 BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN S-101 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN S-102 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN S-103 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN S-501 ROOF FRAMING PLAN ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS AD100 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - BASEMENT AD101 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - GROUND FLR AD102 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - 2ND FLR AD103 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - 3RD FLR AD201 EXTERIOR DEMOLITION ELEVATIONS A-001 GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION A-100 BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-101 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-102 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-103 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A-104 ROOF PLAN I hereby certify that the portion of this technical submission described herein was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and responsible charge. I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Iowa. Signature Date Registration expires: Pages or sheets covered by this seal: License #: KEVIN W. MONSON PROJECT LOCATION Signature Date Pages or sheets covered by this seal: I hereby certify that the portion of this technical submission described herein was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and responsible charge and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Iowa. License Renewal Date: License #: SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4KEYPLAN 111 113 1 1 7 121 127 1 1 5 AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION 1 1 9 E. COLLEGE ST. AD001 DEMOLITION REFERENCE VIEW 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 UP UP BASEMENT 113 BASEMENT 115 EXIST. FOUNDATION WALL TO BE MAINTAINED D1 D21 D12 D13 D13 D4 D7 D18 D12 D38 D38 D38 D38 D20 D4 D2 D15 D4 D4 D4 BASEMENT 117 BASEMENT 121 EXISTING GAS/WATER/SPRINKLER D4D4D4 D4D4 D4 D4 D4 BASEMENT 127 THE GRADUATE BASEMENT 109 105 E. COLLEGE ST D4 D31 D38 D20 D20 D20 D2 D18D18D18D18 D18D18 D20 D4 D2 D2 D12D12D12D12D12 D12D12D12D12D12 D4 D20 D4 D2 D20 D4D4 D2 D2 D12 D2 D12D12D12D12D12D12 AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION (TOWER PHASE) D20 D4D4 D12D12D12D12D12D12 D13 D2D2D2D2 D2D2 D12 D4D4 D4 D2 REMOVE ALL CEILINGS OTHER THAN TIN PANELS. SALVAGE TIN CEILING IN DEMOLISHED PORTION OF BUILDING FOR PATCHING IN AREAS NOT DEMOLISHED. SEE A-SHEETSSEE A-SHEETS LINE OF BLDNG DEMOLITION. SEE A-SHEETS. LINE OF BLDG DEMOLITION. SEE A-SHEETS. D5 COLUMN AND FOOTING TO REMAIN NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. D14 D12 D12 ALL SUPPLEMENTAL/TEMPORARY COLUMNS IN BASEMENT 121 NEED TO BE REMOVED. CONTRACT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW OF SUPPORTED STRUCTURE PRIOR TO REMOVAL NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. COLUMN AND FOOTING TO REMAIN COLUMN AND FOOTING TO REMAIN D14 COLUMN AND FOOTING TO REMAIN. DEMOLITION NOTES EXISTING BUILDING ELEMENTS TO REMAIN PROPOSED DEMOLITION 1. REMOVE ALL MEPT SYSTEM COMPONENTS WITHIN AREAS OF THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT TO BE ABANDONED BY THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. 2. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE EXISTING BRICK VENEER AND/OR CMU, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT JAMBS. 3. WHERE PORTIONS OF MASONRY WALLS ARE REMOVED, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT ENDS OR WHERE THEY MEET NEW MASONRY WALLS. 4. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE FLOOR FOR NEW ELEVATOR, STAIRS, OR MECH. SHAFTS, SEE A- SHEETS FOR SIZE OF OPENING. 5. REMOVE ALL SATC CEILINGS 6. ALL GYPSUM, PLASTER AND HARD LID CEILINGS ARE TO REMAIN U.N.O. 7. REMOVE SEALANT AT ALL WINDOWS TO REMAIN AND PREP FOR NEW SEALANT. 8. REFER TO THE UNDERSLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS OF SAWCUTTING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING AND CONDUIT NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 9. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF ADDITIONAL OPENINGS TO BE CUT IN EXISTING WALLS FOR NEW DUCTWORK AND PIPING. SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4AD100 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - BASEMENT 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 3/32" = 1'-0"A1 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - BASEMENT DEMOLITION KEYNOTES D1 REMOVE ALL FLOOR FINISHES AND ADHESIVES; HARD WOOD AND SUB-FLOOR TO REMAIN D2 REMOVE DOOR AND FRAME D3 REMOVE MASONRY WALL D4 REMOVE STUD WALL D5 REMOVE PORTION OF WALL FOR NEW OPENING, SEE A-SHEETS FOR SIZE AND DETAILS D7 REMOVE ALL SATC AND GRID D8 REMOVE ELEVATED FLOOR AND FRAMING D9 REMOVE FLOOR AND FRAMING D10 REMOVE TILE FLOORING, TILE BASE, AND SETTING BED/GROUT D11 REMOVE BAR COUNTER, WALL FRAMING, AND EQUIPMENT D12 REMOVE PLUMBING FIXTURES D13 REMOVE TOILET ACCESSORIES AND RESTROOM FLOORING D14 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB/PAVING D15 REMOVE WINDOW AND FRAME D18 REMOVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ASSOCIATED DUCTWORK D20 REMOVE STAIR/RAMP D21 REMOVE COLUMN WRAP AND TRIM; COLUMN TO REMAIN D23 REMOVE EQUIPMENT D24 REMOVE ELEC FIXTURES D26 PREP WD TO BE PAINTED D27 REMOVE ROOFING AND INSULATION DOWN TO DECK D28 REMOVE RADIATOR EQUIPMENT AND PIPES D30 REMOVE INFILL D31 REMOVE CONCRETE BASE D32 REMOVE FENCE D33 REMOVE TRANSOM AND FRAME D34 REMOVE DOOR PANEL D35 REMOVE DOWNSPOUT D36 REMOVE GUTTER D37 REMOVE FIRE ESCAPE D38 REMOVE PORTION OF BUILDING SHOWN ON PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY D39 REMOVE DECORATIVE DRYWALL CEILING/SOFFTS AND ASSOCIATED FRAMING DNUP UP UP UP NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. REMOVE VINYL TREAD COVERS AND NOSINGS EXIST. MASONRY WALL AND FOUNDATION TO BE MAINTAINED AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION (TOWER PHASE) OPEN TO BELOW D1 D11 D12 D13 D12 D2 D4 D9 D4 D20 D20 D4 D21 D21D21 D21 D21 D20 D20 D3 D20 D12 D13 D12 D8 D20 D20D20 D8 D20 D4 D20 D4 D12 D13 D7 D8 D7 D4 D2 D4 D20 D4 D4 D4 D12D12 D53'-8"D21D21D21D21 D15D15D15 D2 THE GRADUATE109 PATRON105 E. COLLEGE ST REMOVE CELLAR ENTRANCE D2 D2 D38 D9 D10 FLOOR TILE TO REMAIN REMOVE DOOR SALVAGE FOR REUSE AS NEW ENTRANCE D2 D38 D38 GAS METERS TO BE RELOCATED ALONG SOUTH WALL D14 D32 D32D32 REMOVE TREES STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 121 UNION BAR 127 MARTINI'S 117 REVIVAL D20 D15 PROTECT EXISTING HEX-TILE FLOORING BELOW. D5 D32D32 115 GRAZE111 FIELDHOUSE D20 D4 D20 D4 D15 D1 D23 D11 D8 D38 D23 D8 D12D12 D38 D20D20 D11 D20D20 D12 D2 D5 D2 D2 D4D4 D11D11 D20 D4 D20 D5D5 D2 COLUMN TO REMAIN. D26D26 D26 D38 D20 D20 REMOVE FLOORING ON RAMP AND METAL THRESHHOLD D4 COLUMN TO REMAIN.SEE A-SHEETSSEE A-SHEETS SEE A-SHEETSSEE A-SHEETS D9D9 D9 D8D8 D4 D4 D4 D11D11 D21 D21 NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. D3 D3 REMOVE GLASS CLADDING AND SALVAGE FOR REUSE LINE OF BLDG DEMOLITION. SEE A-SHEETS. LINE OF BLDG DEMOLITION. SEE A-SHEETS. REMOVE GRAFFITI REMOVE GRAFFITI REMOVE GRAFFITI REMOVE GRAFFITI DEMOLITION NOTES EXISTING BUILDING ELEMENTS TO REMAIN PROPOSED DEMOLITION 1. REMOVE ALL MEPT SYSTEM COMPONENTS WITHIN AREAS OF THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT TO BE ABANDONED BY THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. 2. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE EXISTING BRICK VENEER AND/OR CMU, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT JAMBS. 3. WHERE PORTIONS OF MASONRY WALLS ARE REMOVED, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT ENDS OR WHERE THEY MEET NEW MASONRY WALLS. 4. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE FLOOR FOR NEW ELEVATOR, STAIRS, OR MECH. SHAFTS, SEE A- SHEETS FOR SIZE OF OPENING. 5. REMOVE ALL SATC CEILINGS 6. ALL GYPSUM, PLASTER AND HARD LID CEILINGS ARE TO REMAIN U.N.O. 7. REMOVE SEALANT AT ALL WINDOWS TO REMAIN AND PREP FOR NEW SEALANT. 8. REFER TO THE UNDERSLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS OF SAWCUTTING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING AND CONDUIT NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 9. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF ADDITIONAL OPENINGS TO BE CUT IN EXISTING WALLS FOR NEW DUCTWORK AND PIPING. SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4AD101 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - GROUND FLR 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 3/32" = 1'-0"A1 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - GROUND FLOOR DEMOLITION KEYNOTES D1 REMOVE ALL FLOOR FINISHES AND ADHESIVES; HARD WOOD AND SUB-FLOOR TO REMAIN D2 REMOVE DOOR AND FRAME D3 REMOVE MASONRY WALL D4 REMOVE STUD WALL D5 REMOVE PORTION OF WALL FOR NEW OPENING, SEE A-SHEETS FOR SIZE AND DETAILS D7 REMOVE ALL SATC AND GRID D8 REMOVE ELEVATED FLOOR AND FRAMING D9 REMOVE FLOOR AND FRAMING D10 REMOVE TILE FLOORING, TILE BASE, AND SETTING BED/GROUT D11 REMOVE BAR COUNTER, WALL FRAMING, AND EQUIPMENT D12 REMOVE PLUMBING FIXTURES D13 REMOVE TOILET ACCESSORIES AND RESTROOM FLOORING D14 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB/PAVING D15 REMOVE WINDOW AND FRAME D18 REMOVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ASSOCIATED DUCTWORK D20 REMOVE STAIR/RAMP D21 REMOVE COLUMN WRAP AND TRIM; COLUMN TO REMAIN D23 REMOVE EQUIPMENT D24 REMOVE ELEC FIXTURES D26 PREP WD TO BE PAINTED D27 REMOVE ROOFING AND INSULATION DOWN TO DECK D28 REMOVE RADIATOR EQUIPMENT AND PIPES D30 REMOVE INFILL D31 REMOVE CONCRETE BASE D32 REMOVE FENCE D33 REMOVE TRANSOM AND FRAME D34 REMOVE DOOR PANEL D35 REMOVE DOWNSPOUT D36 REMOVE GUTTER D37 REMOVE FIRE ESCAPE D38 REMOVE PORTION OF BUILDING SHOWN ON PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY D39 REMOVE DECORATIVE DRYWALL CEILING/SOFFTS AND ASSOCIATED FRAMING DNUP UP UP D1 D7 D18 D12 D18 D12 D4D4D4 D1 D7 D8 D18 D4 REMOVE NOSINGS AND VINYL TREADS/RISERS. STAIRS & HANDRAILS TO REMAIN. D15D15D15D15D15 D20 D24 D21 D21 D11 D20 D38 121 E. COLLEGE (UNION BAR)119 E. COLLEGE D12 D4 113.5 E. COLLEGE APARTMENTS 111 E. COLLEGE D20 D38 125 E COLLEGE (APARTMENTS) THE GRADUATE109 E. COLLEGE ST 105 E. COLLEGE ST D2 D26 D26D26 D38 REMOVE DOOR PANEL. FRAME TO STAY AND BE PAINTED. D28 REMOVE (2)STREET LIGHTS, BRACKET AND ASSOCIATED WIRING AND RETURN TO THE CITY D26D26D26 D28 D28D28 D28 D28 D5 D38 OPEN TO BELOW D18D18D18D18 D18D18D18D18 D18 AREA OF NEW CONSTRUCTION (TOWER PHASE) D4 D20 D11 D4 D20 D12D12 D9 D39 D4 D11 D12 D20 D38 D9 COLUMN TO REMAIN NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. D26 TYP. TYP.D26 D15D15 NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. D4 D38 D27 COLUMN TO REMAIN LINE OF BLDG DEMOLITION. SEE A-SHEETS. LINE OF BLDG DEMOLITION. SEE A-SHEETS.6'-0"3'-11"D5SEE A-SHEETSD4 D2 D20 D4 DEMOLITION NOTES EXISTING BUILDING ELEMENTS TO REMAIN PROPOSED DEMOLITION 1. REMOVE ALL MEPT SYSTEM COMPONENTS WITHIN AREAS OF THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT TO BE ABANDONED BY THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. 2. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE EXISTING BRICK VENEER AND/OR CMU, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT JAMBS. 3. WHERE PORTIONS OF MASONRY WALLS ARE REMOVED, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT ENDS OR WHERE THEY MEET NEW MASONRY WALLS. 4. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE FLOOR FOR NEW ELEVATOR, STAIRS, OR MECH. SHAFTS, SEE A- SHEETS FOR SIZE OF OPENING. 5. REMOVE ALL SATC CEILINGS 6. ALL GYPSUM, PLASTER AND HARD LID CEILINGS ARE TO REMAIN U.N.O. 7. REMOVE SEALANT AT ALL WINDOWS TO REMAIN AND PREP FOR NEW SEALANT. 8. REFER TO THE UNDERSLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS OF SAWCUTTING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING AND CONDUIT NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 9. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF ADDITIONAL OPENINGS TO BE CUT IN EXISTING WALLS FOR NEW DUCTWORK AND PIPING. SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4AD102 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - 2ND FLR 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 3/32" = 1'-0"A1 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - 2ND FLOOR DEMOLITION KEYNOTES D1 REMOVE ALL FLOOR FINISHES AND ADHESIVES; HARD WOOD AND SUB-FLOOR TO REMAIN D2 REMOVE DOOR AND FRAME D3 REMOVE MASONRY WALL D4 REMOVE STUD WALL D5 REMOVE PORTION OF WALL FOR NEW OPENING, SEE A-SHEETS FOR SIZE AND DETAILS D7 REMOVE ALL SATC AND GRID D8 REMOVE ELEVATED FLOOR AND FRAMING D9 REMOVE FLOOR AND FRAMING D10 REMOVE TILE FLOORING, TILE BASE, AND SETTING BED/GROUT D11 REMOVE BAR COUNTER, WALL FRAMING, AND EQUIPMENT D12 REMOVE PLUMBING FIXTURES D13 REMOVE TOILET ACCESSORIES AND RESTROOM FLOORING D14 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB/PAVING D15 REMOVE WINDOW AND FRAME D18 REMOVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ASSOCIATED DUCTWORK D20 REMOVE STAIR/RAMP D21 REMOVE COLUMN WRAP AND TRIM; COLUMN TO REMAIN D23 REMOVE EQUIPMENT D24 REMOVE ELEC FIXTURES D26 PREP WD TO BE PAINTED D27 REMOVE ROOFING AND INSULATION DOWN TO DECK D28 REMOVE RADIATOR EQUIPMENT AND PIPES D30 REMOVE INFILL D31 REMOVE CONCRETE BASE D32 REMOVE FENCE D33 REMOVE TRANSOM AND FRAME D34 REMOVE DOOR PANEL D35 REMOVE DOWNSPOUT D36 REMOVE GUTTER D37 REMOVE FIRE ESCAPE D38 REMOVE PORTION OF BUILDING SHOWN ON PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY D39 REMOVE DECORATIVE DRYWALL CEILING/SOFFTS AND ASSOCIATED FRAMING DN1/2" / 1'-0"PHASE II NEW CONSTRUCTION SKYLIGHTS TO REMAIN D15D15 D20 D4 D20 D3 119 E. COLLEGE D30 D4 D4D4 D15D15D15D15D15D15 D15 D4 D4 D3D3D3 D20 D3D3 D9 105 E. COLLEGE ST D27 D27 D27 D27 D27 D28 THE GRADUATE D5 D5 D28 D5 D28 D28 D5 SALVAGE EXISTING DOOR AND TRIM D18D18D18 D18D18D18 D18D18 D18 D18 D18 D18 D38 D38 D38D38 D38 REMOVE TOP PORTION OF MASONRY WALL. SEE A- SHEETS FOR EXTENT SEE A-SHEETSD30 D30 D28 5'-6"D4D4 D36 D23 SEE A-SHEETSSEE A-SHEETS 12'-10"D9D9 D2 D9D9 REMOVE WOOD FLOORING AND SUB- FLOOR. SALVAGE REUSABLE WOOD FLOORING TO PATCH ADJACENT SPACE REMOVE CEILING IN THIS AREA REMOVE CEILING IN THIS AREA SEE A-SHEETS REMOVE GRAFFITI 2'-0"3'-6"D9 DEMOLITION NOTES EXISTING BUILDING ELEMENTS TO REMAIN PROPOSED DEMOLITION 1. REMOVE ALL MEPT SYSTEM COMPONENTS WITHIN AREAS OF THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT TO BE ABANDONED BY THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. 2. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE EXISTING BRICK VENEER AND/OR CMU, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT JAMBS. 3. WHERE PORTIONS OF MASONRY WALLS ARE REMOVED, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT ENDS OR WHERE THEY MEET NEW MASONRY WALLS. 4. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE FLOOR FOR NEW ELEVATOR, STAIRS, OR MECH. SHAFTS, SEE A- SHEETS FOR SIZE OF OPENING. 5. REMOVE ALL SATC CEILINGS 6. ALL GYPSUM, PLASTER AND HARD LID CEILINGS ARE TO REMAIN U.N.O. 7. REMOVE SEALANT AT ALL WINDOWS TO REMAIN AND PREP FOR NEW SEALANT. 8. REFER TO THE UNDERSLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS OF SAWCUTTING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING AND CONDUIT NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 9. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF ADDITIONAL OPENINGS TO BE CUT IN EXISTING WALLS FOR NEW DUCTWORK AND PIPING. SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4AD103 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - 3RD FLR 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 3/32" = 1'-0"A4 OVERALL DEMOLITION PLAN - 3RD FLOOR DEMOLITION KEYNOTES D1 REMOVE ALL FLOOR FINISHES AND ADHESIVES; HARD WOOD AND SUB-FLOOR TO REMAIN D2 REMOVE DOOR AND FRAME D3 REMOVE MASONRY WALL D4 REMOVE STUD WALL D5 REMOVE PORTION OF WALL FOR NEW OPENING, SEE A-SHEETS FOR SIZE AND DETAILS D7 REMOVE ALL SATC AND GRID D8 REMOVE ELEVATED FLOOR AND FRAMING D9 REMOVE FLOOR AND FRAMING D10 REMOVE TILE FLOORING, TILE BASE, AND SETTING BED/GROUT D11 REMOVE BAR COUNTER, WALL FRAMING, AND EQUIPMENT D12 REMOVE PLUMBING FIXTURES D13 REMOVE TOILET ACCESSORIES AND RESTROOM FLOORING D14 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB/PAVING D15 REMOVE WINDOW AND FRAME D18 REMOVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ASSOCIATED DUCTWORK D20 REMOVE STAIR/RAMP D21 REMOVE COLUMN WRAP AND TRIM; COLUMN TO REMAIN D23 REMOVE EQUIPMENT D24 REMOVE ELEC FIXTURES D26 PREP WD TO BE PAINTED D27 REMOVE ROOFING AND INSULATION DOWN TO DECK D28 REMOVE RADIATOR EQUIPMENT AND PIPES D30 REMOVE INFILL D31 REMOVE CONCRETE BASE D32 REMOVE FENCE D33 REMOVE TRANSOM AND FRAME D34 REMOVE DOOR PANEL D35 REMOVE DOWNSPOUT D36 REMOVE GUTTER D37 REMOVE FIRE ESCAPE D38 REMOVE PORTION OF BUILDING SHOWN ON PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY D39 REMOVE DECORATIVE DRYWALL CEILING/SOFFTS AND ASSOCIATED FRAMING Level 1 -125 4" Level 2 -125 15'-2" LEVEL 3 -119 28'-10" LEVEL 1 -119 2" LEVEL 2 -119 16'-0" REMOVE BLACK STUCCO FACADE REMOVE "REVIVAL" LETTERING AND RETURN TO REVIVAL8"3"REMOVE BRICK FACADE, WALL FRAMING, WINDOWS, DOORS, SIGNAGE, CANOPIES SALVAGE DOOR AND REUSE D2 D2 REVIVAL 119 D26 D26 D26D26 D26 D26 D26D26D26 D26D26 D15D15 Level 1 -125 4" Level 2 -125 15'-2" LEVEL 3 -119 28'-10" LEVEL 2 -111/113 17'-8" LEVEL 1 -119 2" LEVEL 1 -111/113 2'-5" LEVEL 2 -119 16'-0" D38 D15 D15 D15 D15 D38 D20 D15 D15 D15 D15 D2 D33 D34 D35 D37 REMOVE IVY D2 D33 D18 D35 D36 D35D35 D35 D38 D38 D32 D2 D2 D26 D26 TYP. D26 TYP. D2 D35 D35 REMOVE GRAFFITI DEMOLITION NOTES EXISTING BUILDING ELEMENTS TO REMAIN PROPOSED DEMOLITION 1. REMOVE ALL MEPT SYSTEM COMPONENTS WITHIN AREAS OF THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT TO BE ABANDONED BY THE WORK OF THIS CONTRACT. 2. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE EXISTING BRICK VENEER AND/OR CMU, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT JAMBS. 3. WHERE PORTIONS OF MASONRY WALLS ARE REMOVED, TOOTH-IN SOLID END BRICK AT ENDS OR WHERE THEY MEET NEW MASONRY WALLS. 4. WHERE NEW OPENINGS ARE CUT INTO THE FLOOR FOR NEW ELEVATOR, STAIRS, OR MECH. SHAFTS, SEE A- SHEETS FOR SIZE OF OPENING. 5. REMOVE ALL SATC CEILINGS 6. ALL GYPSUM, PLASTER AND HARD LID CEILINGS ARE TO REMAIN U.N.O. 7. REMOVE SEALANT AT ALL WINDOWS TO REMAIN AND PREP FOR NEW SEALANT. 8. REFER TO THE UNDERSLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS OF SAWCUTTING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDERSLAB PIPING AND CONDUIT NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 9. REFER TO MECHANICAL PLANS FOR LOCATIONS OF ADDITIONAL OPENINGS TO BE CUT IN EXISTING WALLS FOR NEW DUCTWORK AND PIPING. SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4AD201 EXTERIOR DEMOLITION ELEVATIONS 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 NORTH-DEMOLITION 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 SOUTH-DEMOLITION DEMOLITION KEYNOTES D1 REMOVE ALL FLOOR FINISHES AND ADHESIVES; HARD WOOD AND SUB-FLOOR TO REMAIN D2 REMOVE DOOR AND FRAME D3 REMOVE MASONRY WALL D4 REMOVE STUD WALL D5 REMOVE PORTION OF WALL FOR NEW OPENING, SEE A-SHEETS FOR SIZE AND DETAILS D7 REMOVE ALL SATC AND GRID D8 REMOVE ELEVATED FLOOR AND FRAMING D9 REMOVE FLOOR AND FRAMING D10 REMOVE TILE FLOORING, TILE BASE, AND SETTING BED/GROUT D11 REMOVE BAR COUNTER, WALL FRAMING, AND EQUIPMENT D12 REMOVE PLUMBING FIXTURES D13 REMOVE TOILET ACCESSORIES AND RESTROOM FLOORING D14 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB/PAVING D15 REMOVE WINDOW AND FRAME D18 REMOVE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND ASSOCIATED DUCTWORK D20 REMOVE STAIR/RAMP D21 REMOVE COLUMN WRAP AND TRIM; COLUMN TO REMAIN D23 REMOVE EQUIPMENT D24 REMOVE ELEC FIXTURES D26 PREP WD TO BE PAINTED D27 REMOVE ROOFING AND INSULATION DOWN TO DECK D28 REMOVE RADIATOR EQUIPMENT AND PIPES D30 REMOVE INFILL D31 REMOVE CONCRETE BASE D32 REMOVE FENCE D33 REMOVE TRANSOM AND FRAME D34 REMOVE DOOR PANEL D35 REMOVE DOWNSPOUT D36 REMOVE GUTTER D37 REMOVE FIRE ESCAPE D38 REMOVE PORTION OF BUILDING SHOWN ON PLAN IN ITS ENTIRETY D39 REMOVE DECORATIVE DRYWALL CEILING/SOFFTS AND ASSOCIATED FRAMING UP UP UP UP B3 A-211 B3 A-211 B1 A-211 B1 A-211 A-221 A1 LOUNGE 06B BASEMENT 115 03 BASEMENT 113 02 BASEMENT 127 06 F16 F16 M1.8 X01A STAIR X01 A-222 C1 EXISTING GAS/WATER/SPRINKLER A-221 A5 BASEMENT 117 04 06 4300; WD STAIRS & RAILING -7'-0" -9'-0" -9'-0" -8'-0" -8'-0" 05 5100; MTL STAIRS 06G 06F 06C UTILITY 06C B2 A-211 B2 A-211 BASEMENT 109 01 BASEMENT 119 05 05B WOMEN 06F MEN 06G FITNESS 06A MEETING 06E MEETING 06D EXISTING GAS METERS A-403 C4 C2 A-403 A2 REPAIR REPLACE TREADS & RISERS. EXISTING STRINGERS TO REMAIN. 05A 06E 06B L1.4 10'-5" A-403A3 06D 5'-9" 8'-5" 4'-5" 3'-4" 12'-9" 9'-0"13'-2"12'-10"17'-0"L1.4 L1.4 L3.4 A-401 C3 L1.4 A1 A-211 A1 A-211 7'-10"06H 19'-0" (+/-)11'-0" (+/-)A4 A-501 M1.8 S6 S6 06A S4 S4 S5 06 4300; WD STAIRS & RAILING L3.514'-0"5'-4"6'-1"27'-4"L1.4 5'-9" 16'-2" M1.8 07 2700; FLUID APPLIED AIR BARRIER MEMBRANE 07 2100; FOAM BOARD INSUL 07 2700; FLUID APPLIED AIR BARRIER MEMBRANE 07 2100; FOAM BOARD INSUL L1.4 B4A4 L1.4 STOR. 06H 06I MECH. 06I 06J MECH. 06J L3.4 A-403A1 13'-8"7'-10"27'-2"-9'-0" -9'-0" 05 5100; SS HANDRAIL -8'-0" 03 3000; CIP CONC (2 RISERS) 03 3000; CIP CONC 11"NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. 1'-0" ADA THRESHOLD 09 6500; LVT GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. WALLS TO BE TYPE L3.4, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REPLACE ALL SEALANT JOINTS AT EXISTING WINDOWS. 4. WHEREVER DEMOLITION OF WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, CASEWORK, OR OTHER ITEMS RESULTS IN EXPOSED, UNFINISHED EDGES, PLANES, OR FACES OF ADJOINING WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, ETC., THESE UNFINISHED ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED, PATCHED AND FINISHED WITH LIKE/COMPATIBLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 5. WHERE REMOVAL OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND TELECOM ITEMS, LEAVES HOLES IN THE EXISTING WALLS, FLOORING, FLOOR SLAB, CEILINGS, AND/OR ROOF DECK, CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL HOLES LEFT FROM REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS TO MATCH ADJACENT ASSEMBLY AND SURFACE PRIOR TO REFINISHING. 6. WHERE EXISTING OPENINGS IN MASONRY WALLS ARE TO BE FILLED WITH SIMILAR MASONRY UNITS, TOOTH-IN SOLID BRICK OR CMU AT JAMBS. EQEQEQEQ EQ EQ GYP BDEXISTING WD DECK SATC 24X24 CEILING LEGEND LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE EXIT LIGHT CAN LIGHT COVED LINEAR WALL WASHER RECESSED/PENDANT LED DOWNLIGHT 2'x4' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED/PENDANT DOWNLIGHT 4X4 SURFACE MOUNT SQUARE LED RCP GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW CEILING LAYOUT AS SHOWN AND NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, OR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, ETC. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 2. LOCATE DOWNLIGHTS AND WALL WASHERS IN CENTER OF CEILING TILE. IF CONFLICT OCCURS, NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF ALL RECESSED DOWNLIGHTS IN GYP.BD. CEILINGS. COORDINATE WITH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. ALL EXPOSED CEILING EDGES SHALL BE FINISHED. 5. CEILINGS SHALL BE CENTERED WITHIN ROOM IN EACH DIRECTION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. PAINT ALL EXPOSED DUCTS, PIPES, STRUCTURE - PAINT WHITE. 7. CEILING ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE ROOM IN WHICH IT IS INSTALLED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. FOR CLARITY PURPOSES ONLY CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES, THE LOCATION OF WHICH ARE CRITICAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL COORDINATION PURPOSES, ARE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL OTHER CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES AS SHOWN ON OTHER DRAWINGS. 9. PAINT ALL EXISTING HARD BOARD AND NEW GYP BD CEILINGS 2'x2' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNT LINEAR TEMP LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED ADJUST. SPOT ELECTRICAL PANEL PHONE / DATA WALL SCONCE PENDANT LIGHT SATC 24X24 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4A-100 BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A1 BASEMENT REFLECTED CEILING PLAN DN DN UP A-201 B1 B3 A-211 B3 A-211 B1 A-211 B1 A-211 A-201 A1 A-221 A2 A-221 B5 ENTRY 119 104 TENANT 121A 105A X1.8 X1.8 M1.8M1.8 W3.3 A2 A-301 106A TENANT 115 102 TENANT 113 101 A-222 C2 A-222 A5 A-401 C2 A-401 B4 1'-5" 1'-8" 1'-9"2'-5" 4" 1'-5" 1'-8"1'-9"2'-5" REVIVAL 117 103 REUSE EXISTING GLASS CLADDING TO INFILL EXISTING OPENING B2 A-211 B2 A-211 TENANT 121B 105B L4.6 2'-9" M1.8 M1.8 M1.8 'WHITE BOX' LEVEL FINISH: • CLEAN EXIST. TILE FLOORING • EXIST. MASONRY WALLS • NEW WALLS: LVL 5 DRYWALL FINISH/PAINTED • EMERGENCY/EXIT LIGHTING • MIN. PWR REQ'D BY CODE • MEP STUBBED-IN & CAPPED 'WHITE BOX' LEVEL FINISH: • CLEAN EXIST. TILE FLOORING • EXIST. MASONRY WALLS • NEW WALLS: LVL 5 DRYWALL FINISH/PAINTED • EMERGENCY/EXIT LIGHTING • MIN. PWR REQ'D BY CODE • MEP STUBBED-IN & CAPPED NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O. NO OTHER WORK U.N.O. WITHIN THIS SET NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O 106C105D105B106DS3 A-403 C4 C2 A3 A-301 105A105C103A 104B 101A100A 100B 100C 104A106 10" NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O NO WORK IN THIS AREA U.N.O 115A 5'-0"5'-0" B1 A-501 05 5100; SS HANDRAIL 05 5100; SS HANDRAIL TENANT 109 100 A-403 B3 A-501 A2 104COFFICE 106C WOMEN 106B A1 A-211 A1 A-211 MARTINI'S 106 34'-10" (+/-)7'-10"38'-0"A-501 C1 A-501 D1 01B 4'-7" 4'-7"106C102B 101C 101B S3 S7 A1 A-501 S1S1 B4A4 06 1000; WD JOIST AND 3/4" PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR 2" 106B 10" B1 17'-0"10'-0" A-403A1 MEN 106A1'-6"GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. WALLS TO BE TYPE L3.4, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REPLACE ALL SEALANT JOINTS AT EXISTING WINDOWS. 4. WHEREVER DEMOLITION OF WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, CASEWORK, OR OTHER ITEMS RESULTS IN EXPOSED, UNFINISHED EDGES, PLANES, OR FACES OF ADJOINING WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, ETC., THESE UNFINISHED ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED, PATCHED AND FINISHED WITH LIKE/COMPATIBLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 5. WHERE REMOVAL OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND TELECOM ITEMS, LEAVES HOLES IN THE EXISTING WALLS, FLOORING, FLOOR SLAB, CEILINGS, AND/OR ROOF DECK, CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL HOLES LEFT FROM REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS TO MATCH ADJACENT ASSEMBLY AND SURFACE PRIOR TO REFINISHING. 6. WHERE EXISTING OPENINGS IN MASONRY WALLS ARE TO BE FILLED WITH SIMILAR MASONRY UNITS, TOOTH-IN SOLID BRICK OR CMU AT JAMBS. REVIVAL 117 103 TENANT 121A 105A TENANT 121B 105B ENTRY 119 104 STAIR X01 TENANT 115 102 TENANT 113 101 09 2116; GYP BD PAINT EXISTING METAL CEILING TENANT 109 100 EQ EQ EQ EQEQ EQ EQEQEQEQGYP BDEXISTING WD DECK SATC 24X24 CEILING LEGEND LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE EXIT LIGHT CAN LIGHT COVED LINEAR WALL WASHER RECESSED/PENDANT LED DOWNLIGHT 2'x4' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED/PENDANT DOWNLIGHT 4X4 SURFACE MOUNT SQUARE LED RCP GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW CEILING LAYOUT AS SHOWN AND NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, OR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, ETC. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 2. LOCATE DOWNLIGHTS AND WALL WASHERS IN CENTER OF CEILING TILE. IF CONFLICT OCCURS, NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF ALL RECESSED DOWNLIGHTS IN GYP.BD. CEILINGS. COORDINATE WITH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. ALL EXPOSED CEILING EDGES SHALL BE FINISHED. 5. CEILINGS SHALL BE CENTERED WITHIN ROOM IN EACH DIRECTION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. PAINT ALL EXPOSED DUCTS, PIPES, STRUCTURE - PAINT WHITE. 7. CEILING ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE ROOM IN WHICH IT IS INSTALLED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. FOR CLARITY PURPOSES ONLY CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES, THE LOCATION OF WHICH ARE CRITICAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL COORDINATION PURPOSES, ARE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL OTHER CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES AS SHOWN ON OTHER DRAWINGS. 9. PAINT ALL EXISTING HARD BOARD AND NEW GYP BD CEILINGS 2'x2' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNT LINEAR TEMP LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED ADJUST. SPOT ELECTRICAL PANEL PHONE / DATA WALL SCONCE PENDANT LIGHT SATC 24X24 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4A-101 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A1 FIRST LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN UP WH WHWH WH UP A-201 B1 B3 A-211 B3 A-211 B1 A-211 B1 A-211 A-201 A1 A-221 C5 A-221 B1 APARTMENTS 125 205 STUDIO 123B 204B X1.8 01C APARTMENTS 113.5 202 A-401 A2 A-222 C3 05 05 05 05 05050504 10 10 10 10 10 10 STUDIO 123A 204A STUDIO 123C 204C TENANT 111 201 05 5100; MTL STAIRS REVIVAL 117 203A RS FLEX SPACE 203B DRESS RM 203C DRESS RM 203D RS OFFICE 203F OFFICE/ STOR.204A204B204C204D204Ac 204Cb 204Ab 204Bb 204Bc 204Cc 204Db 203C203E RR 203E213B 204 CORRIDOR 204 B2 A-211 B2 A-211 OPEN TO BELOW LOFT 109 200 A-222 D4 'WHITE BOX' LEVEL FINISH: • CLEAN EXIST. TILE FLOORING • EXIST. MASONRY WALLS • NEW WALLS: LVL 5 DRYWALL FINISH/PAINTED • EMERGENCY/EXIT LIGHTING • MIN. PWR REQ'D BY CODE • MEP STUBBED-IN & CAPPED NO WORK U.N.O. WITHIN THIS SET NO WORK U.N.O. WITHIN THIS SET 204Ad 204Cd 204Dd 204Dc 07 9200; JOINT SEALANT 07 9200; JOINT SEALANT 07 9200; JOINT SEALANT 07 9200; JOINT SEALANT 07 9200; JOINT SEALANT 07 9200; JOINT SEALANT A-401 A4 A-402 A-402B4 X1.8 M1.8 F2 W4.6 A3 A-301 205B 205A 205C 205D202B 202A A-404 NO WORK U.N.O. WITHIN THIS SET COMMONS 119 204 W4.6 W4.6 OPEN TO BELOW A1 A-211 A1 A-211 3'-4"3'-2"20'-0"6'-6" 4'-10"2'-3"STUDIO 123D 204D 2'-5" 8'-8" A4 1'-0" D1 D3 D4 D2 204Bd L3.4 202C 3'-4" 2'-8" 3'-4" 2'-8" 3'-4" 2'-8" 3'-4" 2'-8" 3'-4" 2'-8" 3'-4" GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. WALLS TO BE TYPE L3.4, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REPLACE ALL SEALANT JOINTS AT EXISTING WINDOWS. 4. WHEREVER DEMOLITION OF WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, CASEWORK, OR OTHER ITEMS RESULTS IN EXPOSED, UNFINISHED EDGES, PLANES, OR FACES OF ADJOINING WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, ETC., THESE UNFINISHED ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED, PATCHED AND FINISHED WITH LIKE/COMPATIBLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 5. WHERE REMOVAL OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND TELECOM ITEMS, LEAVES HOLES IN THE EXISTING WALLS, FLOORING, FLOOR SLAB, CEILINGS, AND/OR ROOF DECK, CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL HOLES LEFT FROM REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS TO MATCH ADJACENT ASSEMBLY AND SURFACE PRIOR TO REFINISHING. 6. WHERE EXISTING OPENINGS IN MASONRY WALLS ARE TO BE FILLED WITH SIMILAR MASONRY UNITS, TOOTH-IN SOLID BRICK OR CMU AT JAMBS. GYP BDEXISTING WD DECK SATC 24X24 CEILING LEGEND LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE EXIT LIGHT CAN LIGHT COVED LINEAR WALL WASHER RECESSED/PENDANT LED DOWNLIGHT 2'x4' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED/PENDANT DOWNLIGHT 4X4 SURFACE MOUNT SQUARE LED RCP GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW CEILING LAYOUT AS SHOWN AND NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, OR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, ETC. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 2. LOCATE DOWNLIGHTS AND WALL WASHERS IN CENTER OF CEILING TILE. IF CONFLICT OCCURS, NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF ALL RECESSED DOWNLIGHTS IN GYP.BD. CEILINGS. COORDINATE WITH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. ALL EXPOSED CEILING EDGES SHALL BE FINISHED. 5. CEILINGS SHALL BE CENTERED WITHIN ROOM IN EACH DIRECTION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. PAINT ALL EXPOSED DUCTS, PIPES, STRUCTURE - PAINT WHITE. 7. CEILING ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE ROOM IN WHICH IT IS INSTALLED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. FOR CLARITY PURPOSES ONLY CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES, THE LOCATION OF WHICH ARE CRITICAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL COORDINATION PURPOSES, ARE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL OTHER CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES AS SHOWN ON OTHER DRAWINGS. 9. PAINT ALL EXISTING HARD BOARD AND NEW GYP BD CEILINGS 2'x2' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNT LINEAR TEMP LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED ADJUST. SPOT ELECTRICAL PANEL PHONE / DATA WALL SCONCE PENDANT LIGHT SATC 24X24 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4A-102 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A1 SECOND LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN DN A-201 B1 B3 A-211 B3 A-211 B1 A-211 B1 A-211 A-201 A1 A-221 D5 A-221 B2 RIVERSIDE THEATRE 3023/4" / 1'-0"3/4" / 1'-0"L3.4 L4.6 01D 303A303B 309A 01D A-401 A1 A-222 C4 05 05 05 05 05 05 A-201C1 A-201 C3 05 5100; MTL STAIRS OFFICE 308A 309B309C STORAGE 310 GREEN RM 304 5'-1"4'-2"12'-10"WOMEN'S 305 MEN'S 306 306 307 RR 307 A-402 B2 A-211 B2 A-211 A-402A1 RIVERSIDE LOBBY 301 SHOP 303 STAIR X01 SLL 309 303C 301AB1 A2 B2 C2D2 C3 D3 WALL TO WALL BUILT-UP THEATRICAL FLOOR. SEE ASSEMBLIES ON A-001 R1 R1 R1 05 7113; PREFABRICATED SPIRAL STAIR A-222 D5 304 314 RR 314 306A 308A 3051/2" / 1'-0"3/4" / 1'-0"29'-0 1/4" 28'-9 1/4" 28'-10 1/2" 308B 301B 301C 301D A-404 4'-3"B4 A-222 L3.4 5 07 07 07 USE EXISTING SALVAGED BRICK 04 2001; BRICK 05 5133; MTL LADDER A1 A-211 A1 A-211 COAT STORAGE 308B 5'-10"6'-6"15'-6" 15'-6" 10'-0" 07 9200; JOINT SEALANT D3 D4 D2 A-402 B3 A-403D1 302A 302B S9 S10 04 2001; BRICK 05 5133; MTL LADDER L5 6'-3" CLCL 08 8000; GLAZING08 8000; GLAZING08 8000; GLAZING08 8000; GLAZING TYP. A-501 A3 FILL WINDOW OPENING W/ 2ND PANE (IG-1) F3.1 F3.1 F3.3 F3.3 14'-0" 12'-11" 2" F3.4 L0.1 F3.3 06 F3.2 F3.2 F3.1 F3.1 F3.2 F3.2F3.2 JAN. 306A F3.1 GENERAL FLOOR PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. WALLS TO BE TYPE L3.4, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REPLACE ALL SEALANT JOINTS AT EXISTING WINDOWS. 4. WHEREVER DEMOLITION OF WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, CASEWORK, OR OTHER ITEMS RESULTS IN EXPOSED, UNFINISHED EDGES, PLANES, OR FACES OF ADJOINING WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, ETC., THESE UNFINISHED ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED, PATCHED AND FINISHED WITH LIKE/COMPATIBLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 5. WHERE REMOVAL OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND TELECOM ITEMS, LEAVES HOLES IN THE EXISTING WALLS, FLOORING, FLOOR SLAB, CEILINGS, AND/OR ROOF DECK, CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL HOLES LEFT FROM REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS TO MATCH ADJACENT ASSEMBLY AND SURFACE PRIOR TO REFINISHING. 6. WHERE EXISTING OPENINGS IN MASONRY WALLS ARE TO BE FILLED WITH SIMILAR MASONRY UNITS, TOOTH-IN SOLID BRICK OR CMU AT JAMBS. 2'-8"EQ EQ EQ EQ EQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQ5'-8"2'-11"2'-0" 5'-10" 5'-10" 5'-10" 3'-1" 3'-1" 5'-10" 5'-10" 5'-10"2'-0" 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 05 5000; PIPE GRID SYSTEM 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 7'-9" 6'-1" 6'-1" 6'-7" 17'-8"5'-3"2'-0"2'-0" GYP BDEXISTING WD DECK SATC 24X24 CEILING LEGEND LINEAR PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURE EXIT LIGHT CAN LIGHT COVED LINEAR WALL WASHER RECESSED/PENDANT LED DOWNLIGHT 2'x4' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED/PENDANT DOWNLIGHT 4X4 SURFACE MOUNT SQUARE LED RCP GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW CEILING LAYOUT AS SHOWN AND NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF ANY CONFLICTS WITH STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, OR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, ETC. BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 2. LOCATE DOWNLIGHTS AND WALL WASHERS IN CENTER OF CEILING TILE. IF CONFLICT OCCURS, NOTIFY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION OF ALL RECESSED DOWNLIGHTS IN GYP.BD. CEILINGS. COORDINATE WITH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. ALL EXPOSED CEILING EDGES SHALL BE FINISHED. 5. CEILINGS SHALL BE CENTERED WITHIN ROOM IN EACH DIRECTION, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. PAINT ALL EXPOSED DUCTS, PIPES, STRUCTURE - PAINT WHITE. 7. CEILING ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE ROOM IN WHICH IT IS INSTALLED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. FOR CLARITY PURPOSES ONLY CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES, THE LOCATION OF WHICH ARE CRITICAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL COORDINATION PURPOSES, ARE SHOWN. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL OTHER CEILING MOUNTED DEVICES AS SHOWN ON OTHER DRAWINGS. 9. PAINT ALL EXISTING HARD BOARD AND NEW GYP BD CEILINGS 2'x2' TROFFER LIGHT SURFACE MOUNT LINEAR TEMP LIGHT SURFACE MOUNTED ADJUST. SPOT ELECTRICAL PANEL PHONE / DATA WALL SCONCE PENDANT LIGHT SATC 24X24 05 5213; PIPE AND TUBE RAIL/GUARD 6" MTL JOIST @ 16" O.C. W/ 3/4" PLYWOOD DECK OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW B4 A-222 05 5213; PIPE AND TUBE RAIL/GUARD 05 5213; PIPE AND TUBE RAIL/GUARD SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4A-103 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 3/32" = 1'-0"A1 THIRD LEVEL REFLECTED CEILING PLAN B3 A-211 B3 A-211 B1 A-211 B1 A-211 3/4" / 1'-0"3/4" / 1'-0"3/4" / 1'-0"A-201C1 A-201 C3 B2 A-211 B2 A-211 R1 R1 R1 1/2" / 1'-0"3/4" / 1'-0"R1 1/4" / 1'-0"A3 A-301B4 A-222 07 6200; SHEET MTL GUTTER 07 6200; SHEET MTL GUTTER 07 6200; SHEET MTL GUTTER A1 A-211 A1 A-211 A-402 1 A-403D123 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 07 6200; SHEET MTL GUTTER 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4A-104 ROOF PLAN 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 ROOF PLAN 04 2000; REPAIR TERRA COTTA DECORATIVE MEDALIONS SIGNAGE 04 7200; CAST STONE MASONRY S3 09 9000; PAINT WOOD DOOR FRAME AND DECORATIVE TRIM. COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 09 9000; PAINT METAL WINDOW FRAME. COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 09 9000; PAINT WOOD WINDOW FRAME AND SILL AND DECORATIVE TRIM. COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 09 9000; STRIP/STAIN/SEAL WOOD DOOR. COLORS TBD BY ARCHITECT 09 9000; PAINT WOOD WINDOW FRAME AND SILL AND DECORATIVE TRIM. COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 09 9000; PAINT WOOD WINDOW FRAME AND SILL AND DECORATIVE TRIM. COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 04 2000; TUCKPOINT OPEN JOINTS IN EXIST CAST STONE FACADE S1 ALIGN JOINTS WITH MULLIONS 01010101 S15'-4" 1'-8" 3'-4"11'-3"3'-4"3'-4" 11'-3" 3'-4"5'-4" 1'-8" S11S11 0707 07 07 S12 WINDOW SYSTEM AND DOOR LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING FUTURE TENANTS 05 05 05 05 05 05 050505050505 0504101010101010 09 9000; PAINT WOOD WINDOW FRAME AND SILL. COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 09 9000; PAINT WOOD DOOR FRAME. COLORS TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 05 5100; SS GUARDRAIL 05 5100; SS GUARDRAIL 06 2000; WD FRAMED INFILL TO MATCH EXSTING ADJACENT OPENING 06 S8 S7 S3 04 2000; REPAIR/TUCKPOINT MASONRY WALL AND PARAPET 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT 04 7200; CAST STONE MASONRY 07 07 07 23 0000; MECH. EQUIPMENT SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4A-201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 1/8" = 1'-0"B1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 SOUTH 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EAST 1/8" = 1'-0"C3 WEST SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 418 6th Avenue | Suite 209 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION STRUCTURAL M2B Structural Engineers 422 2nd Ave. SE, Suite B Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401 319-364-0666TB Version 16.4A-901 HISTORIC PRESERVATION PHOTOS 18.114 Tailwind Group 530 S. Front St. Suite 100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT - RENOVATION Mankato, MN 56001 507-322-1200 HPC Submission10/23/2020 XX/XX/XXXX ADDENDUM No. 1 VINYL TREADS AND RISERS AND METAL NOSINGS ARE TO BE REMOVED AND WOOD TREADS ARE TO BE REFURBISHED WOOD HAND RAIL, SPINDALS AND BALASTERS, BASEBOARD AND TRIM TO BE MAINTAINED, CLEANED AND PAINTED. WOOD DOORS, DOOR AND WINDOW FRAMES AND TRIM TO BE MAINTAINED, CLEANED AND PAINTED. CENTAL STAIR (119) AND 2ND LEVEL COMMON SPACE COLLEGE ST. FACADE VINYL FLOORING TO BE REMOVED AND EXIST. WOOD FLOORING TO BE REFURBISHED. EXISTING PLASTER CEILING AND WEST WALL TO BE PATCHED AND PAINTED. EAST WALL PLASTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING BRICK TO BE LEFT EXPOSED. EXISTING TRANSOMS TO BE MAINTAINED/UNCOVERED 121 E. COLLEGE ST. TO BE REMODELED TO REPLICATE MONTGOMERY WARD ERA WOOD CORNICE, WINDOW TRIM, DECORATIVE BANDS AND STOREFRONT FRAME TO BE MAINTAINED, CLEANED AND PAINTED. TILE PROCESSION TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW TILE EXISTING WOOD DOOR TO BE REFURBISHED AND PULLED FORWARD FOR ACCESSIBLITY GLASS FACADE AND DECORATIVE BANDS TO BE MAINTAINED CURVED WINDOW AND WALL TO BE MAINTAINED LETTERING TO BE REMOVED CANOPY TO BE MAINTAINED AND PAINTED. TILE TO BE MAINTAINED, CLEANED. WOOD CORNICE, WINDOW TRIM, DECORATIVE BANDS AND STOREFRONT FRAME TO BE MAINTAINED, CLEANED AND PAINTED. EXISTING CAST STONE AND DECORATIVE MEDALIONS TO BE MAINED, CLEANED/REPAIRED. EXISTING BRICK TOB E CLEANED AND TUCKPOINTED WHERE REQURIED. PROJECT SITE OLD CAPITOL E COLLEGE ST S CLINTON STSHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 111 E Grand Ave Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 VICINITY MAPS INDEX OF DRAWINGS ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION MODUS ENGINEERING MEP DESIGN ASSIST 118 E COLLEGE ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.248.4600 M2B STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL ENGINERING 422 2ND AVE SE SUITE B CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401 319.364.0666 MMS CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERING 1917 S GILBERT ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.351.8282TB Version 16.4G-001 TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX 18.114 TAILWIND GROUP 530 S Front St #100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDING Mankato, MN 56001 507.322.1200 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDING 119 East College Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 PROGRESS SET10.16.2020 TELECOM DRAWINGS T101 LEVEL 1-2 LOW VOLTAGE T102 LEVELL 3-4 LOW VOLTAGE T103 LEVEL 5-6 LOW VOLTAGE T104 LEVEL 7-8 LOW VOLTAGE T105 LEVEL 9-10 LOW VOLTAGE T106 LEVEL 11 & ROOF LOW VOLTAGE A-501 DETAILS A-502 DETAILS (concrete and masonry) A-503 DETAILS (precast) A-504 DETAILS A-505 DETAILS A-601 DOOR SCHEDULES AND FRAME TYPES A-602 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE AND FINISH DETAILS A-701 CASEWORK SECTIONS AND DETAILS A-710 ADD/ALT 1 - AMENITIES TUNNEL FIRE PROTECTION DRAWINGS ME001 COVER SHEET F101 PARKING LEVELS 1-2 SPRINKLER FLOOR PLAN F102 LEVEL 3-4 SPRINKLER FLOOR PLAN F103 TYPICAL FLOOR SPLINKLER PLAN F501 SPRINKLER DETAILS AND SCHEDULES PLUMBING DRAWINGS P-100 PLUMBING UNDERFLOOR PLAN P-101 PARKING LEVEL 1-2 PLUMBING PLAN P-102 LEVEL 3-4 PLUMBING PLAN P-103 TYPICAL FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN P-104 TYPICAL UNIT ABOVE FLOOR PLUMBING PLANS P-105 TYPICAL UNIT ABOVE FLOOR PLANS P-106 TYPICAL UNIT ABOVE FLOOR PLANS P-107 TYPICAL UNIT UNDERFLOOR PLUMBING PLANS P-501 PLUMBING DETAILS P-502 PLUMBING SCHEDULES P-503 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMS 1-7 P-504 PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAMS 8-14 MECHANICAL DRAWINGS M-101 PARKING LEVEL 1-2 HVAC PLAN M-102 TYPICAL FLOOR HVAC PLAN M-103 TYPICAL FLOOR HVAC PLAN M-104 TYPICAL UNIT HVAC PLAN M-105 TYPICAL UNIT HVAC PLAN M-601 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS E000 ELECTRICAL TITLE SHEET E001 ELECTRICAL GENERAL INFORMATION E101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E201 PARKING LEVEL 1-2 LIGHTING PLAN E202 LEVEL 3-4 LIGHTING PLAN E203 LEVEL 5-6 LIGHTING PLAN E204 LEVEL 7-8 LIGHTING PLAN E205 LEVEL 9-10 LIGHTING PLAN E206 LEVEL 11 & ROOF LIGHTING PLAN E301 PARKING LEVEL 1-2 POWER PLAN E302 LEVEL 3-4 POWER PLAN E303 LEVEL 5-6 POWER PLAN E304 LEVEL 7-8 POWER PLAN E305 LEVEL 9-10 POWER PLAN E306 LEVEL 11 & ROOF POWER PLAN E307 TYPICAL 1BD UNIT A E308 TYPICAL 1BD UNIT B E309 TYPICAL 2BD TYPE A E310 TYPICAL 2BD TYPE B E311 TYPICAL 2BD TYPE C E312 TYPICAL 3BD UNIT E313 TYPICAL LUX 1 BD E314 TYPICAL LUX 2 BD E315 TYPICAL LUX 2 BD TYPE 2 E800 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES E801 ELECTRICAL DIAGRAMS E850 PANEL SCHEDULES E851 PANEL SCHEDULES GENERAL INFORMATION DRAWINGS G-001 TITLE SHEET AND DRAWING INDEX G-002 CODE INFORMATION CIVIL DRAWINGS C-101 SITE PLAN C-201 DEMO PLAN C-301 UTILITY PLAN C-401 GRADING PLAN STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS S001 NOTES S101 LEVEL ONE FOUNDATION AND PILE PLAN S102 LEVEL TWO FLOOR PLAN S103 LEVEL THREE FLOOR PLAN S104 LEVELS FOUR & FIVE FLOOR PLANS S105 LEVELS SIX & SEVEN FLOOR PLANS S106 LEVELS EIGHT & NINE FLOOR PLANS S107 LEVELS TEN & ELEVEN FLOOR PLANS S108 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S400 BRACING ELEVATIONS S401 SHEAR WALL REINFORCING PROFILES S402 SHEAR WALL REINFORCING PROFILES S403 SHEAR WALL REINFORCING PROFILES S404 SHEAR WALL REINFORCING PROFILES S405 C-STUD WALL LAYOUTS S406 C-STUD WALL LAYOUTS S407 C-STUD WALL LAYOUTS S500 STRUCTURAL DETAILS S501 STRUCTURAL DETAILS S600 LEVEL ONE FOUNDATION & PILE PLAN & PILE CAP DETAILS S601 CONCRETE COLUMN SCHEDULE & COL DETAILS S602 BEAM SCHEDULES & BM DIAGRAMS S603 SECOND LEVEL COL & MIDDLE STRIP SLAB REINFORCING ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS A-001 GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION A-002 GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL INFORMATION A-100 SITE PLAN A-101 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-102 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-103 LEVELS 3-4 FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-104 LEVELS 5-10 FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-105 LEVEL 11 FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN A-121 ROOF TERRACE PLAN A-122 HIGH ROOF & DRAINAGE PLAN A-201 SOUTH ELEVATION A-202 NORTH ELEVATION A-203 EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS A-211 BUILDING SECTIONS A-212 BUILDING SECTIONS A-301 WALL SECTIONS A-302 WALL SECTIONS A-311 WEST STAIR - PLANS AND SECTIONS A-312 EAST STAIR - PLANS AND SECTIONS A-313 PENTHOUSE STAIR - PLAN AND SECTION A-314 ELEVATOR PLANS AND SECTIONS A-401 UNIT TYPE PLANS AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS A-402 UNIT TYPE PLANS AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS A-403 UNIT TYPE PLANS AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS A-404 UNIT TYPE PLANS AND REFLECTED CEILING PLANS A-410 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-411 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-412 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS Signature Date Pages or sheets covered by this seal: I hereby certify that the portion of this technical submission described herein was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and responsible charge and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Iowa. License Renewal Date: Signature Date Pages or sheets covered by this seal: I hereby certify that the portion of this technical submission described herein was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and responsible charge and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Iowa. License Renewal Date: I hereby certify that the portion of this technical submission described herein was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and responsible charge. I am a duly registered Architect under the laws of the State of Iowa. Signature Date Registration expires: Pages or sheets covered by this seal: KEVIN W. MONSON Signature Date Pages or sheets covered by this seal: I hereby certify that the engineering document was prepared by me or under my direct personal supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Iowa. License #: License Renewal Date: 0 DN CODE PLAN LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION NOTESDESCRIPTION FIRE EXTINGUISHER F.E.C. DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD LEGEND (TABLE 1004.1.2) FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET COMPLY WITH IFC906 1 HR RATED SEPARATION 2 HR RATED SEPARATION 3 HR RATED SEPARATION 1 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED CONSTRUCTION. 3/4 HOUR RATED DOOR ASSEMBLIES (UNO) FIRE & SMOKE DAMPERS. 2 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED CONSTRUCTION. 1 1/2 HOUR RATED DOOR ASSEMBLIES (UNO) FIRE & SMOKE DAMPERS. 3 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED CONSTRUCTION. 2 HOUR RATED DOOR ASSEMBLIES (UNO) FIRE & SMOKE DAMPERS. OCCUPANCY SPACE TAG MEANS OF EGRESS DOOR TAG NUMBER OF CALCULATED OCCUPANTS OCCUPANT LOAD FACTOR (SQ. FT. / PERSON) TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS EXITING CAPACITY OF EXIT ELEMENT ACTUAL EXIT WIDTH (INCHES) SQ. FT. OF SPACE NUMBER OF ADVANCING OCCUPANTS DIRECTION OF TRAVEL FEC XX TRAVEL DISTANCE TRAVEL PATH 1150 SF XX XXX XXX XXX XX.X 75 STAIR XXX XXX XX.X TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS EXITING CAPACITY OF EGRESS STAIR ACTUAL STAIR WIDTH (INCHES) MEANS OF EGRESS STAIR TAG 1 HR @ RECESS , TYP. 1 5 6 7432 1089 T.O.PARAPET 91'-4" 1HR ROOF, TYPICAL STAIR ROOFS 15674321089 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 111 E Grand Ave Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION MODUS ENGINEERING MEP DESIGN ASSIST 118 E COLLEGE ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.248.4600 M2B STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL ENGINERING 422 2ND AVE SE SUITE B CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401 319.364.0666 MMS CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERING 1917 S GILBERT ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.351.8282TB Version 16.4G-002 CODE INFORMATION 18.114 TAILWIND GROUP 530 S Front St #100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDING Mankato, MN 56001 507.322.1200 PROGRESS SET10.16.2020 1" = 20'-0" LEVEL 1 1" = 20'-0" LEVEL 2 1" = 20'-0" LEVELS 3-4 1" = 20'-0" LEVELS 5-10 1" = 20'-0" LEVEL 11 1" = 20'-0" ROOF 1" = 20'-0" SECTION DIAGRAM 1 HR @ NORTH & SOUTH EXT. WALLS, TYP 2 HR @ BEARING WALLS, TYP 2 HR @ STAIR, TYP 2 HR @ ELEV.' S, TYP 2 HR @ SHAFT, TYP 2 HR @ COL.'S, TYP 1 HR @ CORRIDOR, TYP 2 HR @ FLOOR, TYP 1 HR @ ROOF 1 HR @ NON-LOAD BEARING DEMISING WALL, TYP 1 HR @ NON-LOAD BEARING DEMISING WALL, TYP 2 HR @ SHAFT, TYP Project Description: The project comprises 118,800-sf on 11 levels, with private terraces on the roof. The lowermost two floors are cast-in-place garage spaces with pre-cast concrete walls on the north and south sides. Each garage level connects to grade independently. Above the garage levels, residential levels are light gauge steel framing with concrete cores at the east and west. Applicable Codes: State of Iowa, City of Iowa City 2018 International Building Code 2018 International Mechanical Code 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, as amended 2018 International Fire Code 2017 National Electrical Code, as amended 2012 International Energy Conservation Code 2018 International Building Code Summary Ch. 3: Occupancy Types R-2 –Residential Group Ch. 4: Special Requirements Ch. 5: Building Heights and Areas Per Table 504.3, R occupancy sprinklered, Type IB, may rise to 180’above grade plane. Per Table 504.4, Construction type IB may include 12 stories, maximum. Ch. 6: Types of Construction Construction Type: 1B Per Table 601, building element fire resistance requirements: Primary Structural Frame: Bearing walls –exterior: 2 hr Bearing walls –interior: 2 hr Non-bearing walls –exterior: Determined by fire-resistance rating requirements per separation distance as described in Table 602 Non-bearing walls –interior: 0 hr Floor construction and secondary members: 2 hr Roof construction and secondary members: 1 hr 1" = 20'-0" NORTH ELEVATION ALLOWABLE OPENING DIAGRAM ALLOWABLE: 25% ACTUAL (MAX PER FLOOR): 25%ALLOWABLE: 45% ACTUAL (MAX PER FLOOR): 25% ALLOWABLE: 45% ACTUAL (MAX PER FLOOR): 25% NOTE: ALLOWABLE PERCENTAGES REFER TO FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCES AS OUTLINED IN IBC 2018 TABLE 705.8 1 HR @ EMERGENCY ACCESS STAIR 2 HR @ FIRE COMMAND CENTER UNIT TYPE SCHEDULE UNIT TYPE COUNT BED COUNT 1BD 16 16 2BD TYPE A 36 72 2BD TYPE B 5 10 2BD TYPE C 6 12 3BD 6 18 TYPE A 8 16 TYPE B 2 4 TYPE C 2 4 TYPE D 2 6 TYPE E 11 11 TYPE F 2 4 TYPE G 4 8 TYPE H 2 2 TOTAL UNIT COUNT: 102 183 CLINTON STREET PEDESTRIAN MALL(FORMER E. COLLEGE ST.)1234BLOCK 82SHEET NUMBERSHEET NAMEPROJECT NO.OWNERPROJECT NAMECONSULTANTS© NEUMANN MONSON INC.Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without writtenpermission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYARCHITECT OF RECORDNeumann Monson Architects221 East College Street | Suite 303Iowa City, Iowa 52240319.338.7878111 E Grand AveDes Moines, Iowa 50309515.339.7800ISSUEDATEDESCRIPTIONMODUS ENGINEERINGMEP DESIGN ASSIST118 E COLLEGE STIOWA CITY, IOWA 52240319.248.4600M2B STRUCTURAL ENGINEERSSTRUCTURAL ENGINERING422 2ND AVE SE SUITE BCEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401319.364.0666MMS CONSULTANTSCIVIL ENGINEERING1917 S GILBERT STIOWA CITY, IOWA 52240319.351.8282TB Version 16.4 18.114TAILWIND GROUP530 S Front St #100E. COLLEGE ST.DEVELOPMENTNEW BUILDINGMankato, MN 56001507.322.1200SCHEMATIC DESIGN DOCUMENTS07.24.2020DESIGN DEVELOPMENT08.31.2020C-101SITE PLANKEYNOTESNUMBERKEYNOTE1234PAVING LEGEND1GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET01"=20'25101520234 LEVEL 1 UPPER -19'-8" LEVEL 3 0" LEVEL 4 9'-7" LEVEL 5 19'-2" 1 5 6 7 LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 6 28'-9" LEVEL 7 38'-4" LEVEL 8 47'-11" LEVEL 9 57'-6" LEVEL 10 67'-1" LEVEL 11 76'-8" ROOF BEARING 85'-9" 432 8 3/4"19'-3"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"8 1/4" 10 LEVEL 2 LOWER -16'-2" 8 9 180'-8" T.O.PARAPET 91'-4" 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 02 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 03 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 01 08 5113; AL WINDOW 08 5113; AL WINDOW 07 6200; SHEET MTL FLASHING 08 3613; OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR 03 4500; PRECAST ARCH CONC 10'-7 1/4"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"3'-0"15'-6"3'-0"5'-6"3'-2" 7'-0" 1'-6"6'-2"10'-8"REVEAL REVEAL REVEAL A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1A1 A2 A2 A4 A2 A2 A4 A2 A2 A4 A2 A2 A4 A2 A2 A4 A2 A2 A2A2 A4 A2A2 A4 A2565 A4 A2A2 A4 A2A2 A4 A2A2 13'-3 3/4"3'-4"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"4'-0 1/4" 3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"5'-7"9'-1"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-6"10'-2"6"3'-8 1/2"6"1'-2"8'-4"1'-8"8'-4"6"1'-5"6'-8"6"2'-5"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"6"2'-5"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"6"2'-5"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"1'-0"T.O. FOOTING WALL1'-8"1'-2"8"2'-11 5/8" 6'-6" 1'-2" 4'-8"3'-10" 1'-6" 1'-6"15'-6"3'-0" 08 3323; OVERHEAD COILING DOOR 08 3613; OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR 08 3323; OVERHEAD COILING DOOR SHEET METAL CLOSER B2 A-501 A2 A-501 C4 A-501 D4 A-501 8"21'-0"20'-4"19'-8"18'-6"16'-10"ROOF TERRACE 87'-10" SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 111 E Grand Ave Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION MODUS ENGINEERING MEP DESIGN ASSIST 118 E COLLEGE ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.248.4600 M2B STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL ENGINERING 422 2ND AVE SE SUITE B CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401 319.364.0666 MMS CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERING 1917 S GILBERT ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.351.8282TB Version 16.4A-201 SOUTH ELEVATION 18.114 TAILWIND GROUP 530 S Front St #100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDING Mankato, MN 56001 507.322.1200 PROGRESS SET10.16.2020 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 SOUTH ELEVATION LEVEL 1 UPPER -19'-8" LEVEL 3 0" LEVEL 4 9'-7" LEVEL 5 19'-2" 1567 LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 6 28'-9" LEVEL 7 38'-4" LEVEL 8 47'-11" LEVEL 9 57'-6" LEVEL 10 67'-1" LEVEL 11 76'-8" ROOF BEARING 85'-9" 4 3 2 19'-3"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"VIF14'-0"10 LEVEL 2 LOWER -16'-2" 89 T.O.PARAPET 91'-4" 08 1113; HM DOOR 03 4500; PRECAST ARCH CONC 08 5113; AL WINDOW 07 6200; SHEET MTL FLASHING 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 03 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 08 5113; AL WINDOW 179'-3" 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 02 1'-7 3/4"1'-8"6'-11"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"3'-7"6'-5"4'-0 1/4" 10'-1 1/4"9'-2"10'-8"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-8"7'-0"3'-0"7'-0"3'-0"7'-0"3'-0"7'-0"3'-0"7'-0"3'-0"7'-0"+/- 2'-11 5/8" 08 5113; AL WINDOW 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 01 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"3'-4"VARIES19'-2"19'-2"19'-2"8'-7"20'-0"4'-2 1/2"1'-0"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"2'-5"6"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"2'-5"6"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"2'-5"6"6'-8"1'-5"6"8'-4"1'-8"8'-4"1'-2"6"3'-8 1/2"6"9'-1"10'-7"A2 A2 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A2 A2 A4 A4 A2 A2 A2 A2 A4 A4 A2 A2 A2 A2 A4 A4 A2 A2 A2 A2 A4 A4 A2 A2 A2 A2 A4 A4 A2 A2 4" ROOF OF ADJACENT EXISTING BUILDINGS FIRE-RATED WINDOW, TYP 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 1'-10"3'-4"1'-10"6'-2"10'-0"7'-2"2'-0"7'-0"10'-0"2'-2"4'-0"6'-2"10'-0"07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 0308 3323; OVERHEAD COILING DOOR 08 9100; LOUVER 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 031'-6"1'-8"T.O. FOOTING WALL EDGE OF PRECAST SHEET METAL CLOSER A2 A-501 6 A-503 7 A-503 2 A-504 C3 A-501 D3 A-501 B3 A-501 6"ROOF TERRACE 87'-10" LEVEL 1 UPPER -19'-8" A LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 2 LOWER -16'-2" LEVEL 1 UPPER -19'-8" A LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 2 LOWER -16'-2" SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 111 E Grand Ave Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION MODUS ENGINEERING MEP DESIGN ASSIST 118 E COLLEGE ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.248.4600 M2B STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL ENGINERING 422 2ND AVE SE SUITE B CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401 319.364.0666 MMS CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERING 1917 S GILBERT ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.351.8282TB Version 16.4A-202 NORTH ELEVATION 18.114 TAILWIND GROUP 530 S Front St #100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDING Mankato, MN 56001 507.322.1200 PROGRESS SET10.16.2020 1/8" = 1'-0"A3 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"D4 EAST @ N ENTRY 1/8" = 1'-0"D5 WEST @ N ENTRY LEVEL 1 UPPER -19'-8" LEVEL 3 0" LEVEL 4 9'-7" A LEVEL 5 19'-2" D B LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 6 28'-9" LEVEL 7 38'-4" LEVEL 8 47'-11" LEVEL 9 57'-6" LEVEL 10 67'-1" LEVEL 11 76'-8" ROOF BEARING 85'-9" C CL LEVEL 2 LOWER -16'-2" T.O.PARAPET 91'-4" 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 02 08 5113; AL WINDOW 07 6200; SHEET MTL FLASHING 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 A5 A5 A5 A5 A5 A5 A5 A5 A6 A6 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 02 5'-7"9'-1"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"19'-8"6"3'-8 1/2"6"1'-2"8'-4"1'-8"8'-4"6"8'-1"6"1'-11"7'-2"2'-5"7'-2"6"1'-11"7'-2"2'-5"7'-2"6"1'-11"7'-2"2'-5"7'-2 1/8"2'-3 7/8"7'-2"11'-2"11 3/4"16'-10"12'-8"12'-8"16'-10"11 3/4" 60'-11 1/2" 28'-0 1/2"1/4"4'-10"1/4"28'-0 1/2" AT ROOF STAIR ENCLOSURES ROOF TERRACE 87'-10" LEVEL 3 0" LEVEL 4 9'-7" A LEVEL 5 19'-2" DB LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 6 28'-9" LEVEL 7 38'-4" LEVEL 8 47'-11" LEVEL 9 57'-6" LEVEL 10 67'-1" LEVEL 11 76'-8" ROOF BEARING 85'-9" CCL T.O.PARAPET 91'-4" 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 01 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 02 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 04 07 6200; SHEET MTL FLASHING 07 4213; MTL PANEL TYPE 03 EXISTING BUILDING PARAPET 07 6200; SHEET MTL FLASHING LIGHTED BUILDING SIGN A3 A1 A3 A1 A1A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A2 A2A2 A2 A1 5'-7"9'-1"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"9'-7"5'-0"2'-11"6'-8"2'-5"6"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"2'-5"6"6'-8"2'-11"6'-8"2'-5"6"6'-8"1'-5"6"8'-4"1'-8"8'-4"1'-2"6"3'-8 1/2"6"1'-0 1/4"16'-10"12'-8"12'-8"16'-10"1'-0 1/4" 61'-0 1/2" 13'-5 1/4"3'-4"27'-5 7/8"3'-4"13'-5 1/4" FIRE-RATED WINDOW, TYP 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN 45 MIN ROOF TERRACE 87'-10" LEVEL 1 UPPER -19'-8" LEVEL 3 0" LEVEL 4 9'-7" LEVEL 5 19'-2" LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 6 28'-9" LEVEL 7 38'-4" LEVEL 8 47'-11" LEVEL 9 57'-6" LEVEL 10 67'-1" LEVEL 11 76'-8" ROOF BEARING 85'-9" 10 LEVEL 2 LOWER -16'-2" T.O.PARAPET 91'-4" ROOF TERRACE 87'-10" LEVEL 1 UPPER -19'-8" LEVEL 3 0" LEVEL 4 9'-7" LEVEL 5 19'-2" LEVEL 2 UPPER -9'-6" LEVEL 6 28'-9" LEVEL 7 38'-4" LEVEL 8 47'-11" LEVEL 9 57'-6" LEVEL 10 67'-1" LEVEL 11 76'-8" ROOF BEARING 85'-9" 10 LEVEL 2 LOWER -16'-2" T.O.PARAPET 91'-4" ROOF TERRACE 87'-10" SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME PROJECT NO. OWNER PROJECT NAME CONSULTANTS © NEUMANN MONSON INC. Unauthorized copying, disclosure or construction without written permission by Neumann Monson Inc. is prohibited. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY ARCHITECT OF RECORD Neumann Monson Architects 221 East College Street | Suite 303 Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319.338.7878 111 E Grand Ave Des Moines, Iowa 50309 515.339.7800 ISSUE DATE DESCRIPTION MODUS ENGINEERING MEP DESIGN ASSIST 118 E COLLEGE ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.248.4600 M2B STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS STRUCTURAL ENGINERING 422 2ND AVE SE SUITE B CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401 319.364.0666 MMS CONSULTANTS CIVIL ENGINEERING 1917 S GILBERT ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 319.351.8282TB Version 16.4A-203 EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS 18.114 TAILWIND GROUP 530 S Front St #100 E. COLLEGE ST. DEVELOPMENT NEW BUILDING Mankato, MN 56001 507.322.1200 PROGRESS SET10.16.2020 1/8" = 1'-0"A3 EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A1 WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"A4 VEST. NORTH 1/8" = 1'-0"A5 VEST. SOUTH MINUTES PRELIMINARY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION EMMA J. HARVAT HALL October 8, 2020 MEMBERS PRESENT: Kevin Boyd, Carl Brown, Helen Burford, Lyndi Kiple, Cecile Kuenzli, Quentin Pitzen, Jordan Sellergren, Austin Wu MEMBERS ABSENT: Sharon DeGraw STAFF PRESENT: Jessica Bristow, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Andrew Ballard, Nancy Bird, Kristin Eastlund, Zach Eastlund, Kevin Monson, Ginalie Swaim CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Boyd called the electronic meeting to order at 5:30p.m. utilizing Zoom. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: None CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: 503 Grant Street Bristow said that this house is in the Longfellow Historic District. She said that it has clipped gables and that it was considered a catalog home. Bristow said the application is for the entrance. In 2008, there was an addition that was approved which included a dormer and called for moving the original front door location to the center and raising and extending the entry canopy. Bristow showed a picture of the house prior to the addition to illustrate that the door was never really centered on the house, and that the dormer was what made it look symmetrical. The portion of the project to move the door was approved but never completed. Instead, the entry portico was widened and extended upwards and outwards, and the door was made into a faux double door so that it would be centered. Bristow showed a picture of what the door looks like now, which maintains its original position and includes additions such as: a fake panel to look like a second door panel, synthetic trim, and siding. Currently, the applicant is doing a larger project which includes removing the aluminum siding and repairing the siding and trim. For part of this project, the applicant wants to remove the fake door panel. Because the project would involve retaining the door in its original location, which would not impact the historic character of the structure, staff recommends approval. Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8) An electronic meeting was held because a meeting in person was impossible or impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members, staff, and the public presented by COVID-19. Boyd asked if there are any clarifying questions. Hearing none, he opened the public hearing. Kuenzli asked for a clearer explanation of why the door could not be centered since now, with the addition of the dormer, the asymmetry is much more noticeable. Zach Eastlund, owner of the house, explained that as you enter the house there is a dividing wall between the living room and the bedroom closet, and that there is no feasible way of centering the door in the opening without removing the interior wall. Kristin Eastlund, owner of the house, said that her husband has been working very hard on this project and has so far removed the siding and restored the original wood siding underneath. Zach Eastlund said that removing the aluminum siding exposed the irregular lap lines, so with the project of re-siding the house they would also like to remove the fake double door as well in order to bring the quality of construction up to their standards. Boyd asked if there are any additional questions for the owners. Hearing none, he closed the public hearing. Sellergren asked if there will be siding where there is no longer a door. Bristow said that the work of restoring the original siding and trim will make the area under the original canopy match the rest of the house. Boyd said that this is a project that aligns with the commission’s principles and what they generally want in terms of maintaining original materials. MOTION: Kuenzli moved that the project at 503 Grant Street be approved as presented in the application. Wu seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0. 533 Summit Street – Summit Street Historic District Bristow said that this house is on the corner of Bowery and Summit and has been for sale for a while. It is covered in aluminum siding, soffits, and PVC shutters. There have been some changes that have happened; most obviously when the interior stairway was straightened, and the doorway was bumped out just a little bit. It has a garage that was built in the 1940s that has doors that tilt upwards instead of the modern overhead doors. Originally, they had talked about repairing the garage - the siding on the east face would need to be replaced, there is rot and damage in the area between the doors in the corners, and there are a few gaps in the Dutch lap siding. The north side is adjacent to an alley and is not in bad condition. The structure has been cross-braced and the bottom of all of the studs have been sistered-in at one point in time. The recent storm caused the cross-bracing to start to pull apart, and the corner posts have cracked vertically all the way up and down. The door height (7 ft.) is also where the roof joist is located, so there is no extra space for a proper header so that a typical overhead door could be installed. There is no ceiling space to put in an opener. Overall, the structure is about one foot too short. Based on the excessive amount of work required and the structural problems due to the storm, staff recommends allowing a demolition for the garage. It would be rebuilt almost as a copy. It would be one foot taller so that it could have the overhead doors and, likely, it will be set on a concrete curb to prevent water damage. The gable ends of the house have staggered shingle siding, and the applicants have requested the same on the garage to match. Staff recommends approval of this demolition and new garage construction. Boyd asked if there are any clarifying questions. Kuenzli asked that, other than the height difference, if it would still be the same width and length as it is currently. Bristow confirmed and said that, otherwise, the current space in the garage is adequate for the size of two vehicles. Hearing no other questions, Boyd opened the public hearing. Hearing no discussion, Boyd closed the public hearing. Burford asked if there is a driveway going up to the garage. Bristow said that there is currently a gravel driveway and, since it comes off of the alley, there is no need for a curb cut. Because of this, neither the pouring of a concrete pad or maintaining the gravel driveway is a code issue. Kuenzli asked if there will be any other attempts, aside from the staggered shingles in the gable, to make the garage match the architecture of the house. For example, the house has a bit of an overhand and Kuenzli asked if an overhang will be added to the garage to make it appear as if it belongs with the house. Bristow said that they had not discussed anything like that so far, but it is up to the commission to decide if they want staff to revisit the issue. Kuenzli said that she wants the garage to match the house more, since it is very visible from the street. Bristow said that there is enough room to install a typical (18”-24”) overhang and not have any issues with the proximity of the house. Kuenzli asked if there is any plan in progress to remove the aluminum siding from the house. Bristow said that it is always a potential project, but there is not a current plan set in place. Burford asked if it is possible to orient the garage so that the entrance is off of the alley. Bristow said that it is most likely not, and since the applicants wanted it rebuilt as is that is all that the code officials looked at. Bristow said that they would not be able to back out of the garage since there is a fence adjacent to the alley, but it would be a tight turn regardless. Boyd said that the application presented is historically accurate and fits with what the commission has done in the past, but is hesitant to add additional features based on the commission’s preference since the original application did not mention anything about it. Bristow said that the commission could suggest talking to the owner again about making the garage look more like a traditional carriage house. Brown asked if the application is the acceptable historical approach since the house is more than 50 years old. Kuenzli said that they should encourage the owners to incorporate more details due to the visibility of the structure. Sellergren asked if the 1940’s traditional structure is similar to some of the two-story carriage houses found on Summit Street, and if that could be the potential standard. Boyd said that he does not think that the commission could force the applicants to make the suggested changes if they did not want to, since they are only requesting to rebuild a historical structure with two functional modifications, and that they would have a hard time not approving the application as is. Wu asked about the original longevity of the structure and said that it might be past its surface life. MOTION: Kiple moved to approve the project at 533 Summit Street as presented in the application with the following conditions: the window, overhead door, and passage door products are approved by staff, and to include the option (and encouragement) to explore more carriage-house details to be consulted by staff. Kuenzli seconds. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0. TAILWINDS DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL, 109-123 COLLEGE STREET, INITIAL COMMENT ON PROPOSAL: Kevin Monson, architect on the project, said that there are a lot of goals for this project, and approval from the commission is necessary in order for the project to move ahead. The project has been ongoing for over 2 years. He said that they are trying to restore and place on historic landmark status the stores on the Ped Mall, but they are also trying to reactivate buildings that have been empty or underutilized for many years. The original Fieldhouse has been empty and very difficult for the owner to find uses for. One of the goals of the project is to make these buildings more usable and attractive. They are also planning for the new structure, which is the engine that drives their ability (supplies the funds) to restore the aforementioned buildings, to be a LEED Gold project, which is a very sustainable and very green process. He said that Riverside Theater has signed a letter of intent to occupy the top two levels of the Crescent Block building, which has been empty/underutilized for several decades. Another goal of the project is to bring the arts back to downtown (the heart of the community) in order to reactivate the diverse activity that was once present. He said that their goal is to start construction before the end of the year, so timing is very critical. Despite their window for change being very small, Monson said that they are coming to the commission tonight to get their ideas so that they may incorporate them as they move forward with the project. Andrew Ballard, an architect on the project, showed a sketch and explained the configuration of the project. He said that the larger goals of the project are to: fulfill the master plan vision by designating local historic landmarks, to activate the Ped Mall with small businesses, to provide exceptional benefits, to match the new building height to The Graduate, and promote environmental sustainability. Ballard showed several historic photos including images from 1910, how the Dooley block components were split by the addition of the Sears, the Crescent building, etc. He said that they do not anticipate doing much work other than patching, repairing paint, and similar interventions. He showed an image of the updated storefront and said that the changes they will be making will minimally impact the historic structure and resemble some of the architecture and style from the Montgomery era. Other changes within the Ped Mall will be relatively minor, but will hopefully make a large difference in accessibility and usability. In terms of removal and replacement, Ballard said that the dotted line in the images represents where the additions will be removed. The larger dash shows the footprint of a new building, and the interstitial represents the courtyard between the old and the new. Ballard said that one of the questions was how services would work, and he said that there are places for dumpsters and other similar services will be conducted towards the rear of the building. He showed several images that depicted the shading and visibility of the new building that would result over the Ped Mall, which is minimal, and the relationships the structure would have in the area. He said that the new building includes two layers of parking and nine stories of diverse residential units, totaling 102 units. Boyd asked if there are any clarifying questions. Wu asked about the south view that includes a logo that says “Nest”, and how settled it is that this logo would be on the western side of the building. Ballard said that it is likely that there will be signage on the building in that location, but the specifics aren’t ironed out just yet. Kuenzli asked about the dimensions (narrowest and widest widths) of the courtyard between the old and new building. Ballard said that the narrowest width is 10 feet, and the widest is about 20 feet. Kuenzli said that this more closely represents a wide sidewalk as opposed to a courtyard. She then asked how many stories would be visible above the existing historic buildings. Ballard directed her back to the section diagram and said that, in front of the Crescent Building one would not see the new building, but in front of the flanking buildings about three stories might be visible. Monson said that the height of the building was per City Council recommendations, and it was consensus that the height should match that of The Graduate Hotel. Kuenzli asked if it was possible to make the courtyard wider. Monson said that it is not possible due to the city code regulations about parking requirements. Kiple asked if the vision of the courtyard was to be used by the public or just the tenants of the building. Monson said that it is intended to be a private courtyard (which is why it is gated), but it will be open to patrons of Riverside Theatre as well. Kuenzli asked if making the new building appear as three buildings instead of one was an active possibility. Monson said that they do not want the new building to appear as if it was constructed at the same time and era as the Ped Mall buildings, so they will be using darker colors and different textures to break up the facades, which will be subtly visible as the natural light changes throughout the day. Boyd opened the public hearing. Ginalie Swaim, representative of Friends Historic Preservation, said that the demolition of the back buildings is a good compromise with what the community is getting (rehabilitation and new energy) in the front. She said that she is happy about the presence of the arts on the top floors of the Crescent Building and said that used to be a non-profit dance studio there in the 1970s and early 1980s. She asked if there will be an HVAC system, elevator shafts, and other similar equipment that will be housed on top of the 11th floor that is not shown in the diagram. She also asked if the new building could be reduced by one story to break up the sheer mass of the structure. Monson said that there will be no HVAC or mechanical system on the roof but, by code, there must be stair access. The elevator system will not protrude above the height, but the stair access will a little bit, and the exit stairs will go down the side. Nancy Bird, executive director of the Iowa City Downtown District, said that the team has done a wonderful job to bring the historic buildings and downtown storefronts back to life. Boyd closed the public hearing. Boyd said that this project is an opportunity for adaptive reuse and to bring life back into the downtown region, as well as look at historic preservation with a wider lens than normal. Sellergren said that the project seems to have been very well thought out but wishes that there could be a way for them to incorporate the traditional black and white awnings into the new design. Wu said that he is not a big fan of the signage on the upper part of the building, but overall thinks that it is a good way to incorporate new buildings and preserve older ones. Kiple is very excited about the project and thinks that it will preserve the character of the Ped Mall. Burford agreed that it is a good project and urges them to be more aggressive about saving the existing entrances. Pitzen and Brown said that the project looks great. Kuenzli said that she approves the proposed demolition behind the historic buildings but wishes that there was more space between the new and old buildings. Boyd asked if there are any concerns from the commission. Sellergren said she wishes the developer would reconsider the large sign that says “Nest”. Wu said that the Jefferson Hotel has a much smaller sign than the proposed “Nest” sign. REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: Certificate of No Material Effect – Chair and Staff Review 629 North Linn Street Bristow said that this is a house in the Northside Historic District that has seen some significant changes, like a concrete porch underneath the existing porch. A contractor will replace the rotting porch floor and develop preventative measures for the future. 516 Grant Street Bristow said that this structure was damaged by a tree falling on it during the storm, and it also had damage from projectiles on the garage. It is being repaired to match the existing. 119-123 North Linn Street, Union Brewery Bristow said that the Union Brewery is having the original wood windows, the paneling below the windows, doors, trim, some of the brackets, soffit, etc. repaired. 811 North Linn Street Bristow said that this is an old house that was moved into this neighborhood a very long time ago. The shingle siding is unpainted but will be painted/stained after the repair of the siding and trim. 625 Clark Street Bristow said that this ranch house was also damaged by the storm - a tree fell on the screen porch and went through some windows and screens. The damage is all in the back. 728 Oakland Avenue Bristow said that a tree fell on a corner of the house, and a bit of the porch as well as the damaged soffit and gutter area will be repaired. 1411 Sheridan Avenue Bristow said that the porch post in the structure has been deteriorating, and the pier is sinking. The pier and the structure underneath the porch floor will be replaced. REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: Minor Review – Staff Review 833 North Johnson Street Bristow said that the basement window around the corner of the structure will be replaced with an egress window, which will look like a double hung but actually be divided in three (like the basement windows) instead of looking like the main windows on the house. 722 Oakland Avenue Bristow said that the garage door on this structure will be replaced, and that it is also owned by the same person who owns 728 Oakland Avenue. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 10, 2020: No discussion. MOTION: Burford moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission’s September 10, 2020 meeting. Kuenzli seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0. COMMISSION INFORMATION: Bristow said that there was a procedural error made by the State for their review of the Iowa City Downtown Historic District National Register nomination, and the review is consequently postponed until February of 2021. The entire process for the review will be repeated at that time. ADJOURNMENT: Kiple moved to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Wu. The meeting was adjourned at 7:30p.m. Minutes submitted by Lauren Ralls. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2019-2020 NAME TERM EXP. 11/14 12/12 1/09 2/13 3/12 4/09 5//14 6/11 7/09 8/13 9/10 10/08 AGRAN, THOMAS 6/30/20 X X X O/E X X X X -- -- -- -- BOYD, KEVIN 6/30/23 X O/E X X X X X X X X X X BROWN, CARL 6/30/23 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- X O/E X X BURFORD, HELEN 6/30/21 X X X X O/E X X X X X X X CLORE, GOSIA 6/30/20 X O/E X X X X X X -- -- -- -- DEGRAW, SHARON 6/30/22 X O/E X X O/E X X X X X X -- KUENZLI, CECILE 6/30/22 X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X X KIPLE, LYNDI 6/30/22 X X O/E O/E X X X X X X -- X PITZEN, QUENTIN 6/30/21 X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X X SELLERGREN, JORDAN 6/30/22 X X O/E O/E X X X X X X X X WU, AUSTIN 6/30/23 -- -- O/E X X O/E X X X X X X From:William Means To:Jessica Bristow Subject:400 N Clinton, 410-412- N Clinton Date:Thursday, October 22, 2020 3:10:25 PM Jessica - I attended the Planning & Zoning Zoom Meeting last week (Oct 15).. They accepted my letter of objection to the project and zoning change. While my computer was not configured properly for Zoom, with their help I was able to offer comments via telephone. I could see that Clark's had offered many changes to the original concept and were agreeing to save and restore the Cochrane-Sharpless-Dennis house. The Commission approved the zoning request changes. There were some comments in support of my objections to the use of steel siding. However, they said that the design aesthetics could take place in a letter hearing and process. I believe that the change in set-back, while specific to 400 N Clinton, will in the future, result in requests for set-back changes along the north side of Davenport Street and along the other houses in the block along Dubuque Street. Given that the project and zoning changes have been approved by the Commission, I expect that the approval process will proceed at the Council's November 17th Hearing and at the December 2nd City Council Meeting. I do not know what control the Historical Preservation Committee has over the project and the rehabilitation of the house. I am hopeful that there will be good direction and supervision over the restoration process. My primary complaint about the use of steel siding remains. This should be changed. The exterior elevations should all be brick - hopefully a dark red/brown consistent with the other properties in the immediate area. In particular, Currier Hall, the sorority house across the street, and the apartment building on the south side of Davenport. The use of steel siding as shown in the drawings, "may be appropriate (acceptable?)" for South Riverside Drive, however it is not in character to the neighborhood.I believe that several members of the Planning & Zoning Commission agreed with this, but felt that it was not subject to their review. What is the position of the Friends of Historic Preservation as to the products used on the exterior elevations? Will they have the ability and authority to address this siding issue and halt the use of steel siding and require the use of brick? Will they support the use of brick?. Can this concern be presented at the November 17th Hearing? I am concerned that the City Council will only rubber stamp the Planning & Zoning Recommendations and the building will proceed as in the proposed drawings Please advise me if there is anything I can do. While I don't like the effects of spot-zoning and the resulting high density (with its many problems, such as parking) I anticipate the project proceeding. Only, hopefully the exteriors can be made more consistent with the character of the neighborhood. Sincerely, William Means