HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-03-04 Info Packet
Ci ty Council I nformati on P acket
Marc h 4, 2021
IP1.Council Tentative Meeting S chedule
Miscellaneous
IP2.2020-2021 I owa C ity Deer Management A nnual Report
IP3.Civil Service Examination: A ssistant Superintendent - Water
Draft Minutes
IP4.A d Hoc Truth & Reconciliation C ommission: February 18
IP5.Community Police Review B oard: F ebruary 9
IP6.Historic Preservation Commission: J anuary 28
IP7.Historic Preservation Commission: F ebruary 11
IP8.S enior C enter Commission: F ebruary 18
March 4, 2021 City of Iowa City Page 1
Item Number: 1.
March 4, 2021
Council Ten tative Meetin g S ch ed u l e
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
C ouncil Tentative Meeting Schedule
City Council Tentative Meeting Schedule
Subject to change
March 4, 2021
Date Time Meeting Location
Tuesday, March 16, 2021 5:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
7:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:00 PM Special Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
Tuesday, April 6, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, April 20, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, May 4, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, May 18, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, June 1, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, June 15, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, July 6, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, July 20, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, August 3, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, August 17, 2021 4:00 PM Work Session Zoom Meeting Platform
6:00 PM Formal Meeting
Item Number: 2.
March 4, 2021
2020-2021 Iowa City Deer Man ag emen t Annual Rep ort
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
2020-2021 I owa C ity D eer Management A nnual R eport
2020 - 2021
CITY OF IOWA CITY
DEER MANAGEMENT
ANNUAL REPORT
The Iowa City City Council adopted a Deer Management Plan in 2019. This plan was developed
in collaboration with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources and local public input and was
approved through the Iowa Natural Resource Commission. The Plan includes one year of
professional sharpshooting, four years of urban bow hunts, and ongoing public education. To
learn more please visit www.icgov.org/deerprogram.
CONTENTS
• Executive Summary
• Deer Collisions + Complaints
• Non-Lethal Deer Management
• Depredation & Urban Bow Hunt Results
• DNR Aerial Survey Results (Attached)
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Iowa City’s Deer Management Plan was formed in response to resident concerns about deer in
urban and suburban areas. A deer count survey conducted in 2018 revealed the urban deer
population had tripled since the City ceased its deer management program in 2010. After
coordinating with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and soliciting public input,
the City Council adopted a Deer Management Plan in 2019. This plan was submitted to the Iowa
Natural Resource Commission (NRC) and included one year of professional sharpshooting, four
years of urban bow hunts, and ongoing public education. A full timeline and history of the City’s
deer management response is available at www.icgov.org/deerprogram.
Public Input
In 2018, a deer committee was formed which consisted of both City staff and community
members. On August 14, 2018, approximately 60 members of the public attended a public input
meeting held to discuss deer population management. Staff offered additional opportunities for
providing input for those unable to attend the public forum.
In August 2020, City staff met with members of the Iowa City Deer Friends to receive feedback
and incorporate their input into the rules for the 2020-2021 urban bow hunt. Members of the
public also addressed the City Council during four City Council meetings at which the urban bow
hunt rules and deer feeding ordinance were on the agendas. The City Council received 17 e-
mails and one letter on the deer management plan and urban bow hunt in 2020. Additionally,
staff received two e-mails requesting information.
Members of the public are invited to provide ongoing input on the City’s deer management
activities by contacting City staff or City Council members. The City will report annually to City
Council on deer management and population estimates for the remainder of the long-term deer
management plan. Residents are invited to provide comments during this time or may address
councilors during the public comment period at any regular City Council meeting.
3
DEER COLLISIONS & COMPLAINTS
Vehicle & Deer Collisions
Between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020, the Iowa City Police Department received
14 calls for service involving vehicular collisions with deer:
2020 Vehicle-Deer Collisions (Iowa City Police Department)
Date Location of Deer Collision Total Estimated Damage
1/2/2020 Melrose Avenue $2,000
1/4/2020 State 1/Iowa 1 & US 218 $3,000
1/13/2020 N Scott Blvd $1,000
9/28/2020 Muscatine Ave $2,000
10/4/2020 US 218/93.2 MM $8,000
10/24/2020 Interstate 80/I 80 $4,000
11/2/2020 Interstate 80/I 80 $5,000
11/2/2020 Interstate 80/I 80 $5,000
11/3/2020 Interstate 80/I 80 $3,000
11/7/2020 McCollister Boulevard $1,000
11/8/2020 US 218 $7,500
11/20/2020 State 1/Iowa 1 $1,500
12/1/2020 Mormon Trek Boulevard $1,500
12/3/2020 HWY 6 E / S Scott Boulevard $1,500
51 54 58 57
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Number of Deer-Vehicle Collisions in Iowa City
4
Deer-Related Calls and Complaints
Animal Services reported receiving three calls from residents regarding deer in 2020. All three
complaints were related to intentional deer feeding. The City Manager’s Office and City Council
received three complaints regarding deer in 2020; two related to deer browsing and one
reporting several deer in the roadway
NON-LETHAL DEER MANAGEMENT
Iowa City’s Long-Term Deer Management Plan includes a series of activities for the City to
provide, consider, or develop. Below is a summary of non-lethal management activities
implemented during 2020:
In August 2020, the City published comprehensive deer management related webpages at
www.icgov.org/deerprogram, which includes:
• Background information and a historical timeline of deer-related issues in the community
and the development and progress of the City’s long-term deer management plan.
• Frequently asked questions
• Information on the 2020-2021 urban bow hunt
• Contact information for residents interested in submitting comments, complaints, or
suggestions related to deer management.
• Links to harvest reports, aerial population surveys, related ordinances and other
documents.
• A link to an Iowa DNR resource on tips for drivers to practice safe driving in areas
populated by deer and avoid deer collisions.
• Guidance from the Iowa State University Extension recommending never feeding deer
and tips on avoiding unintentionally feeding deer.
• Information on deer resistant plants and links to online resources providing lists, photos,
and care information of deer resistant shrubs, plants, and flowers and a link to
information and photos of landscaping design ideas to minimize deer damage.
• Information and links to photos of deer-resistant fencing and vegetative barriers.
• Information on using deer repellents and links to DIY homebrew deer deterrent recipes.
• Tips for living with deer and how to behave around deer.
• Information on deer scare tactics.
5
In September 2020, the City Council passed an ordinance which prohibits the feeding of deer,
including both intentional feeding and placement of edible materials (including bird seed) which
could be reasonably expected to result in deer feeding. The City issued a news release to notify
residents after adoption of the ordinance.
In October 2020, a utility bill insert
dedicated to minimizing deer damage
was included with City water
customers’ utility bills. The insert
included information on not feeding
deer, the use of deer resistant plants,
fencing, or repellants, and driving tips.
Currently, there are four Deer Crossing signs installed within Iowa City limits. These are located
at Dubuque Street, north of Kimball Avenue; Dubuque Street, south of the I-80 bridge;
Rochester Avenue, east of First Avenue; and Rochester Avenue, west of Scott Boulevard.
DEER DEPREDATION RESULTS
The Long-Term Deer Management Plan adopted by City Council and submitted to the Iowa
NRC, included one year of professional sharpshooting a bow hunt in years 2020 – 2024.
2019 – 2020 Professional Sharpshooting
The City contracted with White Buffalo Inc., a wildlife management organization to conduct
the 2019-2020 professional sharpshooting deer cull. White Buffalo Inc. provided a full report of
the cull results in March 2020. Approximately 500 deer were harvested through the sharpshoot.
The meat from the deer (estimated to be approximately 30,000 pounds) was tested for safety by
the Iowa DNR and then processed and donated to local food banks.
6
2020 – 2021 Urban Bow Hunt
Iowa City’s 2020 – 2021 bow hunt season began on October 1, 2020 and ended on January 10,
2021. The City of Iowa City accepted applications for bow hunters until October 20, 2020. Five
hunters applied and were accepted for the hunt. All hunters held a valid DNR Hunting License,
completed the required qualifications at Fin & Feather, and submitted the appropriate paperwork
with the City regarding their hunt locations.
A total of 14 tags were purchased between the five approved hunters. Of those tags, three deer
were harvested during the 2020-2021 urban bow hunt. All the deer were harvested on private
property per the hunt rules.
DNR # Doe Button Buck Total Harvest
48089628 1 1 2
670120278 1 1
3083128 0
1738095 0
4465621 0
Total deer harvested in 2020-2021 Iowa City urban bow hunt: 3
One reporting violation occurred in which two deer were reported to the state but did not get
reported to the City. Contact was made with the hunter and it was determined to be a
misunderstanding of the appropriate procedure. The forms were filled out when the mistake was
identified for record-keeping purposes. No incentive buck tags were earned in Iowa City during
this hunt. There were no complaints received regarding the deer hunt and no injuries reported.
The Iowa City Deer Friends filed a lawsuit against the City, alleging the urban bow hunt is illegal
and requesting an immediate stay of the bow hunt program. The district court’s initial ruling
denied the stay and the final ruling rejected all claims of alleged illegality and dismissed the
lawsuit.
AERIAL DEER SURVEY & DENSITY ESTIMATES
On January 27, 2021, the Iowa DNR conducted an aerial deer survey in Iowa City. The
estimated average deer density is 14.04 deer per square mile in 2021, with 44.27 deer per
7
square mile the highest estimated density for any zone surveyed. The estimated deer density
was 80 deer per square mile in 2018 with, based on a study conducted by White Buffalo Inc.
The 2021 DNR Aerial Survey is attached.
Iowa City Aerial Deer Survey and Hunt Results 2021
Prepared by Andy Kellner, Iowa Department of Natural Resources
The table below shows results of deer observed by helicopter survey on January 27th, 2021 using a Hughes OH-6 helicopter operated
by Bachman Aero. Observers were Steve Woodruff and Dave Nicholson with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources Wildlife
Bureau. Conditions for the survey were very good in all habitat types flown. Snow depth was approximately 7” from fresh snowfall
within 48 hours and few deer beds were observed. The sky was fair and there were light winds out of the north. Temperatures were
between 18 and 20 degrees Fahrenheit. Some shadows were present but light conditions became more favorable as the survey
progressed. The areas surveyed were flown along the contour or with transects and areas were circled if necessary when deer were
spotted.
Results from this year’s aerial survey were compiled with results from historical survey data. This will help provide a baseline
amount of information for the deer numbers in Iowa City and allow for observing trends in population in subsequent years. Additional
survey methods or data sources are encouraged to help provide more information for deer trends going forward including tracking
deer complaints, analyzing deer-vehicle collisions, and camera trap studies.
In the Iowa City Deer Management Zone (Zone 101), 14 of 75 or less than 19% of licenses were sold. Of those 14 licenses 3 antlerless
deer were registered which is about a 21% success rate for hunters.
In the neighboring Coralville Deer Management Zone (Zone 10) 133 out of 200 urban archery licenses were sold. From those tags, 41
does were harvested as well as 3 button bucks. In the adjacent Coralville Perimeter Zone (Zone 25), 462 of 600 licenses were sold.
From those, 140 does, 21 button bucks, 2 spike bucks, and 3 shed antlered bucks were reported to the DNR. This perimeter zone is a
separate pool of antlerless tags that are good for a zone that encompasses land outside of Coralville and Iowa City limits. Those tags
may be purchased for any of the regular statewide hunting seasons. A few more deer may have been harvested on regular season deer
licenses, which cannot be separated at this level.
The continued annual harvest of does, in both the urban and perimeter zones, reduces potential deer numbers directly and indirectly
through abated recruitment of fawns. It is likely that not all of these deer in the outside perimeter would have been permanently
associated with Iowa City, but this reduction can keep deer numbers down and reduce the growth of the herd. There is a strong
likelihood that deer are moving between Iowa City, Coralville, and areas outside of city limits. Increased use of the urban archery
program in Iowa City will be required if it is desired to maintain deer numbers at the present level or lower. Recruiting, educating,
and encouraging additional hunters for the urban program would help increase the harvest which would help the population remain
near the present level.
Iowa City Aerial Surveys Deer Observed
Zone Acres Sq Miles 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2007 2008 2021
A 1,398 2.18 37 60 74 64 29 76 71 170 80 15
B 669 1.05 69 154 81 33 30 30 19 5 2 3
C 808 1.26 78 90 99 39 36 60 43 46 33 30
D 1,489 2.33 65 127 140 38 25 100 88 65 36 103
E 958 1.50 0 0 7 12 0 12 9 41 19 21
F 1,594 2.49 11 15 48 42 15 74 65 80 32 19
G 993 1.55 3 0 4 0 0 0 5 43 35 13
H 1,187 1.85 6 31 48 24 23 42 6 53 26 20
I 1,239 1.94 49 79 197 99 43 169 109 101 39 15
Total 318 556 698 351 201 563 415 604 302 239
Iowa City Aerial Surveys Estimated Deer Density for Survey Zones
Zone Acres Sq
Miles 1997 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2005 2007 2008 2021
A 1,398 2.18 16.94 27.47 33.88 29.30 13.28 34.79 32.50 77.83 36.62 6.87
B 669 1.05 66.01 147.32 77.49 31.57 28.70 28.70 18.18 4.78 1.91 2.87
C 808 1.26 61.78 71.29 78.42 30.89 28.51 47.52 34.06 36.44 26.14 23.76
D 1,489 2.33 27.94 54.59 60.17 16.33 10.75 42.98 37.82 27.94 15.47 44.27
E 958 1.50 0.00 0.00 4.68 8.02 0.00 8.02 6.01 27.39 12.69 14.03
F 1,594 2.49 4.42 6.02 19.27 16.86 6.02 29.71 26.10 32.12 12.85 7.63
G 993 1.55 1.93 0.00 2.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.22 27.71 22.56 8.38
H 1,187 1.85 3.24 16.71 25.88 12.94 12.40 22.65 3.24 28.58 14.02 10.78
I 1,239 1.94 25.31 40.81 101.76 51.14 22.21 87.30 56.30 52.17 20.15 7.75
Average 23.06 40.47 44.90 21.89 13.54 33.52 24.16 34.99 18.05 14.04
Iowa City Aerial Survey Zone Map
Item Number: 3.
March 4, 2021
Civil Service E xamination: Assistan t Superintenden t - Water
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
C ivil S ervice E xamination: Assistant S uperintendent - Water
Item Number: 4.
March 4, 2021
Ad Hoc Tru th & Reconcil iation Commission: F eb ru ary 18
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
Ad Hoc Truth & Reconciliation Commission: F ebruary 18
1
PRELIMINARY MINUTES
AD HOC TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION
COMMISSION FEBRUARY 18, 2021
ELECTRONIC MEETING
MEMBERS PRESENT: ANTHONY CURRIN, AMEL ALI, RANEEM HAMAD, T’SHAILYN HARRINGTON,
ERIC HARRIS, LAYANA NAVARRE-JACKSON, ROYCEANN PORTER, KEVIN JOHN RIVERA, MOHAMED
TRAORE.
STAFF PRESENT: STEFANIE BOWERS.
CALLED TO ORDER: 7:03 PM
APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 4, 2021: Motion by Traore, seconded by Ali. Motion passed 9-0.
PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: Ala Mohamed identified as an IFR
representative. Noted that Commissioner Hamad is not taken seriously by other Commission
members and the TRC is not moving forward.
MEETING ETIQUETTE: Etiquette Officer Traore shared the expectations for the meetings in terms
of rules to follow, 1) Commissioners shall refer to one another by their titles, 2) Commissioners
shall state their names prior to speaking, 3) Commissioners shall yield the floor when done
speaking and, 4) Commissioners shall be respectful to one another and to the community during
their meetings, 5) Commission members are to be at all meetings and take into account comments
from the public/community.
MEETING FORMALITIES: Porter mentioned that each Commissioner calling one another
commissioner gets confusing and so she prefers to just call one another by first names. She also
asked for Commissioners to wait for her to ask for a motion.
Harrington thought the formalities may hinder the group and thinks that because relationships are
being built between members calling each other by first names would be preferred.
Currin mentions that to make it more organic Commissioners should address each other by first
name.
Ali moved and Currin seconded to use a more roundtable approach. Motion passed 9-0.
FACILITATOR AGREEMENT: Ali would like to see the agreement read that the TRC will create the
budget. Traore thinks the language should be changed to read the TRC will be giving the
recommendations to the Council and not the facilitator. He has come up with a list of budget items
and would like it be discussed at future meetings. Hamad thinks the budget language should be
changed to ensure the TRC will be creating the budget. Porter said that the agreement can be sent
(Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8)
An electronic meeting was held because a meeting in person was impossible or
impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of commission members,
staff and the public presented by COVID-19.
2
back to Jesse Case and that it can updated.
Hamad would like to meet with the facilitator instead of just looking at this agreement. She also
thinks that the agreement should have been made with TRC input. Hamad asked for three things to
be included on the agenda for this meeting. Porter said they are not going to talk about this matter
because it is not on the agenda and that there was a response sent to Hamad as to why the items
were not added to the agenda.
Traore asked TRC members to respect one another. Hamad said she is not trying to disrespect the
process but was told she cannot have items added to the agenda. Porter said once there is a
facilitator on board they can discuss Hamad’s items.
Porter moved on to next item on the agenda.
DEFERMENT: RECENT LOCAL COURT DECISIONS AND THE IMPACT ON THE BLACK COMMUNITY IN
JOHNSON COUNTY NEWS RELEASE: Staff reported that this is a placeholder on the agenda because the
TRC decided at its last minute to wait to further discuss this once a facilitator was working with the group.
CORRESPONDENCE: Hamad asked what was going to happen moving forward on the agreement. Staff
said she took notes and will let Jesse/The City know.
Harrington thought the mock up the spaces with the text were short but impactful. Currin likes the
message that the spaces create to the community. Traore also liked the images.
Staff said if Commission members wish to revisit the agreement that would be ok.
Hamad had a clarification item for agenda item #5. Traore reminded that the TRC is on item 7. Harris
did not want to go back and revisit item #5.
Navarre-Jackson thinks it is a good idea to get involved in the mural process.
Harrington asked whether the City has designated any other spaces that have blank canvasses for
expressive art. Staff will follow up with Neighborhood and Development Services. Harris noted that in
the South District they had a space to create a mural. Rivera points out to the public participants that
there is a link in the correspondence to learn more and also provide feedback. He also asked if the TRC
could reach out to Public Space One to see if they can get some of the results from the surveys as it is
relevant to the work of the TRC.
Porter went back to item 5. Hamad asked that the TRC meet with Jesse Case. Porter said this is the
agreement that Jesse Case wrote up and that he is working with the TRC. Hamad asked if there are any
records between Jesse Case and the City including with Geoff Fruin and the City Attorney to have a
better sense of Jesse’s vision.
Porter asked Hamad if she had a different proposal. Hamad wants the opportunity to probe Jesse, also
to discuss transformative justice and that he is responsible to the TRC not the City. Staff asked if
Hamad was making a motion to have Jesse Case to come the next meeting for an interview, the motion
was seconded by the Traore. Motion 5-4. Currin, Harrington, Harris, Porter in the negative.
Porter is confused as to why the TRC keeps going backwards. Currin feels the TRC should be even-
handed. He noted that the contract is with the City and not the TRC. Harris feels that the TRC already
voted on this and wonders how it come back up. Ali said it would not be an interview. Hamad said it
3
cannot be an interview because he has already been chosen and that it is an opportunity to have a
discussion with him since it was not done when he was selected. She thinks it will also benefit the
community.
Traore agrees with Hamad. Porter says this is not the TRC money nor does the TRC sign anything.
Everything will go through the Council. Traore wants to discuss the budget at the next meeting. Harris
thinks it still sounds like an interview and the TRC cannot move forward due to obstructions.
Ali knows Jesse Case very well but not everyone knows Jesse on the Commission or in the community.
She thinks it is fair for the TRC to have the ability to ask questions of him. Currin wants to be even-
handed. Porter does not think the public has anything to with who is selected as the facilitator the
TRC chose the facilitator and that Ali goes back and forth and it is confusing to her. She further states
that this is not how Robert’s Rule work, this is not how a meeting is supposed to go.
There was discussion between TRC members as to whether to allow public comment on this agenda
item.
Emelia Roberts (public participant) agrees that the TRC should look into Jesse Case. The public wants
to know who Jesse Case is.
Ali wants to clear the air about her flip flopping. She voted for Jesse and thinks that it is fair for him to
be questioned. She thinks that the people who are doubters of Jesse will have the opportunity to
meet with him. Currin does not think it is within the TRC purview. He further thinks this conversation
with Jesse was always going to happen and that it would be on the day he starts.
Kimberly Lanegran (public participant) noted that it did not sound like everyone (TRC) was
comfortable with his (Jesse) services.
Hamad would like to wait to send the agreement for Council consideration until the meeting with
Jesse is completed and also would like the budget proposal discussed at the next meeting.
Porter says that this was discussed at the last meeting. Ali asks staff to repeat what was said earlier.
Staff responded that at their meeting on February 4 the TRC voted to have Jesse serve as facilitator,
and then that this evening the TRC voted to interview Jesse and that the discussion at this point
should be more directed at the agreement. Harris says when the TRC keeps saying we need to move
forward they then go backwards and delay items. It is due to things being brought up after decisions
have already been made. Hamad said it is more asking about the specific questions of Jesse’s
agreement before it goes before the Council. She also said that TRC staff does not have the same
power as the facilitator. The facilitator will also have a lot of contact with the community.
Porter if you look at 2B in the agreement she doesn’t understand what the confusion is about on the
agreement. She reminded TRC members that there is a time line that they need to have a budget
proposal to Council and that the TRC is running out of time. Traore says he has a budget proposal
already completed. Porter says that Traore’s budget proposal can be on the agenda for March 4.
Hamad asks if she can add her items to the next agenda for the next meeting on March 4. Harrington
states staff does not decide what goes on the agenda, it is the Chair and Vice Chair. Staff interrupts
and reminds the TRC that this is not an agenda item to be discussed at this time and that you have to
stay on task with the agenda and that the next item is announcements of Commissioners.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF COMMISSIONERS: Traore says that as a public official he represents the public
4
and the City. Ali mentioned the last Council meeting and a topic on the Preliminary Plan to
Restructure the Police Department and encouraged other TRC members to look at the
recommendations and send any comments on it to the Council. Harris asks TRC members to practice
unity. Hamad wants to put on the record that things cannot go on the agenda without the Chair and
Vice Chair approving and feels like she is being muzzled.
STAFF ANNOUCEMENTS: Staff reminded Commissioners to use the City’s subscriber list to receive
notice of the agenda and packets. Also clarifies that a person can send anything as correspondence for a
meeting packet and that moving forward there should be some training on Robert’s Rules.
Porter does not want to go back to public comment. Traore and Hamad do not agree. Harris calls for a
motion on it. Rivera would also like to hear what the public has to say.
Ala Mohamed (public participant) believes when the public can and cannot speak should be made clear.
Emelia Roberts (public participant) is a member of the community and everyone’s opinion is valid. Oliver
(public participant) reports the conduct is extremely disrespectful of some TRC members. Jaylene (public
participant) maybe the TRC could rebase on unity.
Harris listened to everything everyone said and…Ali says they cannot respond to the comments from the
public.
MOTION TO ADJOURN: 9-0. Currin moved seconded by Ali. Motion passed 9-0.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8:46 PM.
AD HOC TRUTH & RECONCILIATION COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
YEAR 2021
(Meeting Date)
NAME
TERM
EXP. 12/21/20 1/7/21 1/21/21 2/4/21 2/18/ 21 3/4/ 21 3/18/21 4/1/21 4/15/ 21 4/29/ 21 5/13/ 21 5/27/ 21 6/10/ 21 6/24/ 21
ALI 6/22 X X X X X
CURRIN 6/22 X X X X X
HARRINGTON 6/22 X X X X X
NAVARRE-
JACKSON
6/22 X X X X X
PORTER 6/22 X X X X X
HAMAD 6/22 X O/E X X X
HARRIS 6/22 X X X X X
RIVERA 6/22 X X X X X
TRAORE 6/22 X X X X X
KEY: X = Present
O = Absent
Item Number: 5.
March 4, 2021
Community P ol ice Review Board : F ebruary 9
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
C ommunity P olice Review B oard: February 9
Item Number: 6.
March 4, 2021
Historic Preservation Commission : Jan u ary 28
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
Historic P reservation C ommission: J anuary 28
Item Number: 7.
March 4, 2021
Historic Preservation Commission : F eb ru ary 11
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
Historic P reservation C ommission: February 11
Item Number: 8.
March 4, 2021
Sen ior Cen ter Commission : F eb ru ary 18
AT TAC HM E NT S:
D escription
Senior Center Commission: F ebruary 18