Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021-05-18 Resolution
Item Number: 7.a. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution Amending and Adopting FY2021 Inter -fund Transfers. Prepared By: Jacklyn Fleagle, Budget & Compliance Officer Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Fiscal Impact: Adopted as part of the FY2021 Amended Budget Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: The Iowa Department of Management has adopted administrative rules regarding the handling of inter - fund transfers. All inter -fund transfers are required to be adopted by resolution by the City Council. The proposed inter -fund transfers are also being adopted as part of the Fiscal Year 2021 Amended Budget. Background /Analysis: In April 2019, the Iowa Administrative Code incorporated new regulations surrounding the management of inter -fund transfers. In addition to being adopted as part of the budget, which is subject to a public hearing, inter -fund transfers are now required to be approved by the City Council by resolution. Each transfer must include the fund sending the transfer, the fund receiving the transfer, the amount of the transfer, and the reason for the transfer. These rules took effect in May 2019. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by. Jacklyn Fleagle, Budget 8 Compliance Officer, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240,(319)35&5063 Resolution No. 21-125 Resolution Amending and Adopting FY2021 Inter -fund Transfers Now therefore, be d resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that the City of Iowa City, in Johnson County, Iowa, approves the following transfer of monies between funds in accordance with the Administrative Code of the State of Iowa. The City Finance Director is hereby authorized to initate and record the listed inter -fund transfers up to the amounts set out below. Transfer Out Transfer In Original Amended Fund Fund Reason Amount Amount General Fund Cable TV Equipment Reserve Equipment Reserve $10,000.00 $10,000.00 General Fund Facility Reserve Reserve Transfer $2,000,000.00 ¢1,000,000.00 General Fund Wastewater Fund Low Income Discount Donations $1,900.00 $3,800.00 General Fund Water Fund Lav Income Discount Donations $1,600.00 $3,200.00 General Fund Refuse Collection Fund Low Income Discount Donations $5,500.00 $11,000.00 General Fund Storm Water Fund Lav Income Discount Donations $1,000.00 $2,000.00 General Fund Capital Projects CIP funding $918,470.00 $1,573,470.00 General Fund Airport Fund CIP funding $100,000.00 $100,000.00 General Fund MPOJC Fund Operating funding $58,127.00 $58,127.00 General Fund Affordable Housing Fund Operating Funding $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 General Fund Library Replacement Reserve Equipment Reserve $62,422.00 $62,422.00 General Fund Debt Service Fund Aniston Village Loan Pmt $20,052.00 $20,052.00 General Fund Transit Fund Transit Levy Transfer $4,080,088.00 $4,140,088.00 General Fund TIF Fund Hilton Garden Inn Rebate Transfer $165,000.00 $84,415.00 General Fund Landfill Fund Loan Repayment $110,178.00 $110,178.00 CDBG Fund Capital Projects CIP funding $128,036.00 $128,036.00 Road Use Tax Fund Capital Projects CIP funding $2,797,000.00 $2,797,000.00 Road Use Tax Fund Landfill Fund Loan Repayment $73,452.00 $73,452.00 Road Use Tax Fund General Fund Forestry Cost Share $88,622.00 $86,622.00 Road Use Tax Fund MPOJC Fund Cost share $320,450.00 $320,450.00 Employee Benefits General Fund Employee benefits $12,350,680.00 $12,350,680.00 Employee Benefits Road Use Tax Fund Employee benefits $622,793.00 $622,793.00 Emergency Levy Fund Capital Projects CIP funding $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Tax Increment Financing General Fund Loan Repayment $88,916.00 $88,916.00 Tax Increment Financing Capital Projects TIF pre -certification expenditures $2,165.00 $2,165.00 Tax Increment Financing Debt Service Debt payments $1,001,061.00 $1,001,061.00 Parking Fund Landfill Fund Loan Repayment $273,405.00 $273,405.00 Parking Fund Parking Capital Reserve Reserve Transfer $1,000,000.00 $750,000.00 Parking Capital Reserve Capital Projects CIP funding $510,000.00 $750,000.00 Transit Fund Transit Capital Projects CIP funding $150,000.00 $250,000.00 Transit Fund Transit Bus Reserve Reserve Transfer $160,000.00 $160,000.00 Wastewater Fund Wastewater Debt Reserve Debt payments $2,862,250.00 $2,862,250.00 Wastewater Fund Wastewater Captial Reserve Reserve Transfer $2,000,000.00 $2,500,000.00 Wastewater Capital Reserve Wastewater Capital Projects CIP funding $1,750,000.DO $2,187,430.00 Wastewater Capital Projects Wastewater Fund Loan Repayment $1,375,000.00 $1,375,000.00 Water Fund Water Debt Reserve Debt payments $1,881,965.00 $1,861,965.00 Water Fund Water Capital Reserve Reserve Transfer $900,000.00 $1,300,000.00 Water Capital Reserve Water Capital Projects CIP funding $1,115,000.00 $1,350,000.00 Refuse Collection Fund Refuse Capital Projects CIP funding $550,000.00 $550,000.00 Landfill Fund Landfill Reserves Closure/Replacement funding $893,110.00 $893,110.00 Landfill Fund Capital Projects CIP funding $1,100,000.00 $1,325,000.00 Landfill Replacement Reserve Capital Projects CIP funding $0.00 $892,000.00 Airport Capital Reserve Capital Projects CIP funding $65,225.00 $83,415.00 Storm Water Fund Storm Water Capital Reserve Reserve Transfer $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 Storm Water Capital Reserve Storm Water Capital Projects CIP funding $931,000.00 $725,000.00 Housing Authority Fund General Fund PILOT/NDS Director cost share $50,720.00 $50,720.00 Equipment Fund Capital Projects CIP funding $0.DO $100,000.00 Central Services Fund Capital Projects CIP funding $0.00 $15,000.00 Passed and approved this 18tH day of May '2021 p Mayor. Ap�pro� y Attest \l1 City Cbrk tt r _ 05/06/2021 Resolution No. Page 2 21-125 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Bergus x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner Item Number: 7.b. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY -�"�'�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution approving an Energy Efficiency TIF Grant Agreement between United Natural Foods, Inc. and the City of Iowa City. Prepared By: Wendy Ford, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The $38,742.85 grant will be funded by internal loan to be repaid from Heinz Road tax increment Recommendations: Staff: Approval 19TOT171u My .al 1111100 "T Attachments: Resolution Grant Agreement Executive Summary: United Natural Foods Inc. (UNFI) has applied for an Energy Efficiency Grant for a project to upgrade their interior lighting to LED. The total project cost is $77,485.70 and the matching grant request is for 50%, or $38,742.85. This project will be funded by the available tax increment in the Heinz Road Urban Renewal Area. Background /Analysis: UNFI's annual usage in KwH (kilowatt hours) to operate the existing system is 437,741. With the upgrade to LED, annual usage will fall approximately 40% to 259,239 KwH, an annual savings of 178,502 KwH. Operating expenses for lighting are projected to drop from $35,019 per year to $20,739 per year, an annual savings of $14,280. The switch to LED lighting will also reduce the need for air conditioning because LEDs do not emit the heat that older lighting systems do. On August 6, 2019, Council declared a Climate Crisis and called on staff to accelerate action to address the climate crisis and limit global warming. To that end, Council adopted the I PCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) targets of a 45% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 and reaching "net -zero" by 2050. Amendment #2 to the Heinz Road Urban Renewal Area created energy efficiency incentives for business and industry located within the urban renewal area. The goal of the program is to provide incentives to industry to improve energy efficiency, reduce carbon emissions required to power their plants and help the City achieve a 45% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030. The Heinz Road Urban Renewal Area was established in 2002 to attract new business, boost business retention and expansion, and retain and attract new jobs to the area. Since then, the taxable valuation of the area has increased by more than $21 million, and is now creating an available tax increment of more than $640,000 each year. Tax increment comes from taxes paid by property owners in this industrial area and is the source for the matching funds on qualified industrial energy efficiency improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Grant Agreement Doc ID: 028118240007 Type: GEN Kind: RESOLUTION Recorded: 06/08/2021 at 10:12:23 AM Fee Amt: $37.00 Pape 1 of 7 Johnson County Iowa Kim Painter County Recorder STATE OF IOWA ) ) SS JOHNSON COUNTY ) Fv'er '0!j City 01' I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Resolution attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 21-126 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of May 2021, all as the same appears of record in my office. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this 3rd day of June 2021. ,1 Kellie K. Fruehling City Clerk \res 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET 0 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 9 (319) 356-5000 • FAX (319) 356-5009 Prepared by: Wendy Ford, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565248 Resolution No. 21-126 Resolution approving an Energy Efficiency TIF Grant Agreement between United Natural Foods, Inc. and the City of Iowa City. Whereas, the Urban Renewal Plan for the Heinz Road Urban Renewal Area, as amended by Amendment No. 2 ('the Plan"), passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, pursuant to Resolution 20-186, on August 4, 2020 and recorded in Book 6091, Page 38-48, in the records of the Johnson County, Iowa Recorder; contemplates the use of tax increment financing to assist industrial users located in the urban renewal area in efforts to reduce their carbon emissions; and Whereas, United Natural Foods, Inc. an industrial user within the Urban Renewal Area, has applied for this assistance to fund improvements to its Facility that are anticipated to reduce its carbon emissions; Whereas, the Staff recommends approval of the negotiated grant agreement to fund up to 50% of the actual project costs through a loan forgivable after 3 years, as further described in the agreement. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that Section 1. The attached Energy Efficiency TIF Grant Agreement by and between the City of Iowa City Iowa and United Natural Foods Inc, is in the public interest of the residents of Iowa City; and Section 2. Said Agreement is consistent with and authorized by the Urban Renewal Plan, as amended, and all applicable State and federal laws including, but not limited to, Iowa Code Chapters 15A and 403; and Section 3. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute the Agreement, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to attest the signature and to affix the seal of the City Clerk; and Section 4. The City Clerk be directed to certify and record the resolution at United Natural Foods Inc.'s expense; and Section 5. The City Manager is hereby authorized to administer the terms of the Agreement. Passed and approved this 18thday of May 2021 K64or Attest: Approved by: Cit Clerk City Attorn , (Sara Greenwood Hektoen — 05112/2021) -1- Resolution No. Page 7 21-126 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Prepared by: Wendy Ford, Econ. Dev. Coordinator, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5248 Energy Efficiency TIF Grant Agreement This Grant Agreement (the "Agreement") is hereby made by and between United Natural Foods, Inc. ("Borrower"), with a facility situated at 2340 Heinz Road, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 (the "Facility"), and the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation whose address is 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa ("City"), Whereas, the City has adopted an urban renewal plan (the "Urban Renewal Plan") that contemplates the use of tax increment financing to assist industrial users located in the urban renewal area in efforts to reduce their carbon emissions; and Whereas, the Urban Renewal Plan is described in Amendment No. 2 to the Heinz Road Urban Renewal Plan, passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, pursuant to Resolution 20-186, on August 4, 2020 and recorded in Book 6091, Page 38-48, in the records of the Johnson County, Iowa Recorder; and Whereas, Borrower, an industrial user within the Urban Renewal Area, has applied for this assistance to fund improvements to its Facility that are anticipated to reduce its carbon emissions; and Now, therefore, for the consideration described herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Project: Borrower intends to complete an interior lighting upgrade with LED fixtures (the "Project") at the Facility on the property legally described below, by or before June 28, 2021. Borrower estimates the total Construction Costs, as defined further below, will be $77,485.70, will save 178,502 KWH/year, and have an annual cost savings of $14,280.00. Parcel 9 Lots 7 and 8, BDI Second Addition to Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 19, Page 80, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. Parcel 2 Lot 8, BDI Fifth Addition to Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 29, Page 74, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. Excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 8 lying within Auditor's Parcel No. 99041, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 40, Page 220, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. Parcel 3 Lot 9, BDi Fifth Addition to Iowa City, Iowa according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 29, Page 74, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. Also including that portion of Lot 6, BDI Second Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 29, Page 74, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, described as Auditor's Parcel 96052 on plat of survey recorded in Book 29, Page 74, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. Also including that portion of Lot 10, BDI Fifth Addition, to Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 29, Page 74, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, described as Auditor's Parcel B on plat of survey recorded in Book 34, Page 207, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. Excepting therefrom that part of Lot 9, designated as Auditor's Parcel A on plat of survey recorded in Book 34, Page 207, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. Also Excepting that part of Lot 9, designated as Auditor's Parcel 95051 on plat of survey recorded in Book 37, Page 48, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, Also Excepting therefrom that portion of Lot 9 lying within Auditor's Parcel No. 99041, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 40, Page 220, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa. 2. Economic Development Grant: In the event Borrower timely completes the Project described above at the Facility and provides the City with evidence of invoices paid to contractors for Construction Costs in amounts that are equal to or exceed $77,485.70, then the City shall grant Borrower $38,742.85, (the "Grant") subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In no event shall the City's contribution toward this project exceed 50% of the total Project cost, up to a maximum of $38,742.85 ("Principal Amount"). Should the Project cost be less than the projected $77,485.70, the City's contribution will be limited to 50% of the actual Construction Costs. Construction Costs are defined as: the cost for the equipment and installation of the equipment as detailed in the attached quote. 3. Source of Grant Funds Limited: Funds for this Economic Development Grant shall come from the Heinz Road Urban Renewal Tax Increment Fund. 4. Maintenance, Operation and Reporting: Borrower agrees to construct, maintain, and operate the Project in excellent working condition in a manner consistent with the energy efficiencies described above for a period of three years. Borrower must submit to the City three (3) annual reports detailing the monthly energy usage and energy costs incurred for the above- described property compared to the monthly energy usage and energy costs incurred in the year before the Project was constructed. This comparison is material to the City's determination of whether the Project is being maintained and operated in accordance with this Agreement. These reports shall be due annually on June 28. 5. Repayment Term: Borrower shall not be obligated to make payments toward the Principal Amount so long as Borrower satisfies the obligations described in Paragraph 1 and 4 above. 6. Interest: No interest shall accrue on the Principal Amount during the term of this Agreement. 7. Release: The City shall forgive this Grant on or about June 28, 2024, provided Borrower has fully satisfied the terms of this Agreement, and the City shall promptly issue a release to be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's office at Borrower's expense. 8. Default and Remedy: If Borrower does not timely complete the Project and maintain and operate the LED fixtures as required herein, for three years from the completion of the Project, the Principal Amount shall be immediately due and payable 60 days after the City mails written notice to Borrower to cure the default at the address listed above and Borrower's failure to cure said default. The City reserves the right to pursue any other remedy available to it at law or equity to collect the amount then due. 9. Representations and Warranties: Borrower represents and warrants: (a) It is a company duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Iowa and registered to do business in the State of Iowa and has all requisite power and authority to develop and construct the Project, to carry on its business as now conducted and as presently proposed to be conducted, and to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement; (b) This Agreement has been duly and validly authorized, executed and delivered by the Borrower and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the City, is in full force and effect and is a valid and legally binding instrument of Borrower enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as the same may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other laws relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally; (c) Neither Borrower nor any person or entity with an ownership interest of more than 25% of Borrower have been adjudicated guilty or liable in any judicial or administrative proceeding of committing a repeated or willful violation of the Iowa Wage Payment Collection law, the Iowa Minimum Wage Act, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act or any comparable state statute or local ordinance, which governs the payment of wages in the last 5 years. 10. Contractor Labor Law Compliance: Borrower acknowledges that the City of Iowa City will not contract with nor provide any economic development incentives to any person or entity who has participated in wage theft by violation of the Iowa Wage Payment Collection law, the Iowa Minimum Wage Act, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or any comparable state statute or local ordinance, which governs the payment of wages. Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is a violation of the FLSA and is included in the definition of wage theft. Borrower agrees that it will require, in any construction contract for the Project the following written provisions, proof of which must be provided to City prior to the start of construction: a) Agreement by the General Contractor to comply with all state, federal and local laws and regulations, including, but not limited to the requirements of Iowa Code Chapter 91C (Contractor Registration with the Iowa Division of Labor), Iowa Code Chapter 91A (Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law), Iowa Code Chapter 91D (Minimum Wage), the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Internal Revenue Code; b) Agreement by the General Contractor to provide to the Borrower and the City no later than the filing of an application for issuance of a building permit, the names and addresses of each subcontractor and the dollar value of the work the subcontractor is expected to perform; C) Demonstration by the General Contractor that it has the capacity to meet all performance, and labor and material payment, bonding requirements relative to the Project. d) Providing to the City a certificate by the General Contractor's insurer that it has in force all insurance coverage required with respect to construction of the Project, including $1,000,000 Commercial General Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by Chapter 85, Code of Iowa. e) Demonstration by the General Contractor that it has required all subcontractors to agree, in writing, that the subcontractor will comply with all state, federal and local laws and administrative rules and regulations, including, but not limited to the requirements of Iowa Code Chapter 91C (Contractor Registration with the Iowa Division of Labor), Iowa Code Chapter 91A (Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law), Iowa Code Chapter 91D (Minimum Wage), the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Internal Revenue Code. 11. Indemnification: Borrower releases the City and the governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof (hereinafter, "Indemnified Parties") from, covenants and agrees that the Indemnified Parties shall not be liable for, and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties against, any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about, or resulting from any defect in, the Project or Borrower's property described in Paragraph 1 above. 12. Covenant: This Agreement shall constitute a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Agreed to on this 3rd day of May , 2021. Borrower: (p City: By: Kathleen Engelke Director Bruce Teague, Mayor� Facility, Energy & Environmental Attest: Kellie Approved by:1���� City Attorney Office STATE OF IOWA ) SS: JOHNSON COUNTY ) CITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT On this t day of _ffi, 20a I before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa, perso ably appeared Oruro Tex as Mayor, and )ISjk i u Pr(ia)ni i as City Clerk, of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. �� s CHRISTINE OLNEY Notary Public in akforthetate of Iowa z � Commission Number 806232 ** My�cL m� opo E p es My commission expires:q'�a� P BORROWER ACKNOWLEDGEMMENT STATE OF, "I IV )SS COUNTYOF This instrument was acknowledged before me on this LN day of V , 2021, by V�AU'ro#etyI cme as ofUNFI. �l1t t,LL fC'r _r,rr/. LINDA K. SCHMEICHEL Notary Public' Notary Pubtia State of Minnesota MY Commission Expires January 31. 2023 Item Number: 7.c. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY -�"�'�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution authorizing the procurement of equipment to upgrade the storage area network for ITS operations. Prepared By: Michael Harapat, ITS Coordinator Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $256,898.47 is available in the ITS Operations Server Hardware fund (83310510) Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: At the May 18, 2021 City Council meeting, consideration will be given to a resolution authorizing the purchase of equipment to upgrade the Nimble Area Storage Network. The upgrade will create additional required storage space, for the current storage area network, upgrade in performance, enhance redundancy, and greater expansion options for future growth. Pricing for two Nimble AF40 Expansion Shelves from CDW Government in Vernon Hills, I L along with two Storage Flash Upgrade Kits and one Storage Adaptive Flash Hybrid Array have been secured thru the National I PA cooperative Contract #2018011-01 for this purchase. Background /Analysis: The ITS Division uses storage area networks for storage of all city business data. This upgrade to the system will add additional storage capacity, provide more options for future growth, and enhance the redundancy of the storage area network. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution P C, Prepared by: Michael Harapat, ITS Coordinator, 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)356-5422 Resolution No. 21-127 Resolution authorizing the procurement of equipment to upgrade the storage area network for ITS operations Whereas, the Nimble Storage Upgrade Project is budgeted for in the Fiscal Year 2021 budget; and Whereas, the National IPA cooperative Contract # 2018011-01 will be utilized for the purchase of the storage area network; and Whereas, the total purchase price of the storage area network with contract discount is $256,898.47; and Whereas, the amount exceeds the City Manager's spending authority of $150,000, thus requiring City Council approval; and Whereas, funds for this purchase are available in account # 83310510; and Whereas, approval of this procurement is in the best interest of city operations. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The proposed procurement as described above is approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized to take the steps necessary to make the purchase Passed and approved this 18th day of May '2021. M Approved by Attest: City Jerk City A orne e — 5/06/2021 Resolution No. 21-127 Page 2 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 7.d. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution adopting the Investment Policy for the City of Iowa City and rescinding Resolution No. 18-219. Prepared By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Reviewed By: Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager Fiscal Impact: No impact Recommendations: Staff: Approval 196TOZ • a ► /G1 Attachments: Resolution Amended Investment Policy Executive Summary: The City Council maintains an Investment Policy to provide for the safety and liquidity of public funds and to maintain compliance with State laws and other applicable regulations. According to the terms of the current Investment Policy, it requires a review every three years. The last Investment Policy update was in 2018. From the current review, an updated Investment Policy is being proposed. Background /Analysis: The City's Investment Policy undergoes a review every three years. The current policy was adopted in 2018 and has undergone a thorough review over the past few months. The findings from that review are being incorporated into an updated Investment Policy. Updates to the Investment Policy include clarification of investment management requirements, clarification on the use of investment pools, incorporation of various State requirements such as meeting the minimum depository rates set by the State Treasurer of Iowa and the use of the State of Iowa Sinking Fund, and the addition of requirements for the use of investment brokers and dealers. In addition to these changes, a new glossary was added to assist readers with understanding banking and investment terminology. The next I nvestment Policy review will be in 2024. ATTACHMENTS: Description resolution Investment Policy -�d Prepared by: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director, 410 E. Washington St. 52240,(319)356-5053 Resolution No. 21-128 Resolution adopting the Investment Policy for the City of Iowa City and rescinding Resolution No. 18-219. Whereas, during the conduct of municipal affairs, the Finance Director of the City of Iowa City invests certain funds of the City, Whereas, the existing Investment Policy was approved in Resolution No. 18-219, Whereas, it is necessary to amend the existing Investment Policy for the Finance Director while conducting official City business to comply with State of Iowa law, and Whereas, the City Manager has formulated an Investment Policy for investing all funds, which is attached to this resolution and by this reference made a part hereof. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that the attached Investment Policy be adopted as the official Investment Policy of the City of Iowa City and that Resolution No. 18-219 is rescinded. Passed and approved this 18th day of May '2021. pprovec-6y Attest: Cit Clerk City Attorney's ffice - 05/11/2021 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X x X X x X finadm\invplcy.res Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner City of Iowa City, Iowa Investment Policy City Council Adoption Date: Next Review Date: SECTION 1. SCOPE OF INVESTMENT POLICY The Investment Policy of the City of Iowa City shall apply to all operating funds, bond proceeds and other funds and all investment transactions involving operating funds, bond proceeds and other funds accounted for in the financial statements of the City. Each investment made pursuant to this Investment Policy must be authorized by applicable law and this written Investment Policy. The investment of bond funds or sinking funds shall comply not only with this investment policy, but also be consistent with any applicable bond resolution. This Investment Policy is intended to comply with Iowa Code Chapters 12B and 12C which govern the investment of public funds. Upon passage and upon future amendment, if any, copies of this Investment Policy shall be delivered to all of the following: 1. The governing body or officer of the City to which the Investment Policy applies. 2. All depository institutions or fiduciaries for public funds of the City 3. The auditor engaged to audit any fund of the City. 4. All fiduciary or third parties assisting with or facilitating investment of the funds of the City. SECTION2. DELEGATIONOFAUTHORITY In accordance with Iowa Code section 12B.100), the responsibility for conducting investment transactions resides with the Finance Director of the City. Only the Finance Director and those authorized by resolution may invest public funds, and a copy of any empowering resolution shall be attached to this Investment Policy. The Finance Director shall establish a written system of internal controls and investment practices. The controls shall be designed to prevent losses of public funds, to document those officers and employees of City responsible for elements of the investment process and to address the capability of investment management. The Finance Director and all employees authorized to place investments shall be bonded in the amount of a minimum of $1,000,000. The City may contract for investing public funds, advising on the investment of public funds, directing the deposit or investment of public funds, or an acting fiduciary regarding the management of public funds, to outside persons, agencies, or institutions under the following conditions: 1. All contracts or agreements shall require the outside person or entity to notify the City in writing, within thirty days of receipt of all communication from their Auditor, of the existence of a material weakness in their internal control structure regarding the type of services being provided to the City by the outside person. 2. The contract or agreement shall provide for receipt and review of the audited financial statements and related reports on internal control structure of the outside person or entity. 3. The records of investment transactions made by or on behalf of the City are public records and will be the property of the City whether in the custody of the City or in the custody of a fiduciary or other third party. 4. A minimum of a $1,000,000 Errors & Omissions insurance policy will be maintained at all rimes and proof of such policy will be provided to the City. 5. All conflicts of interest or third -party agreements regarding recommended investment purchases, investment practices, and usage of outside vendors to perform related functions or services must be disclosed to the City. 6. The requirements for broker/dealers listed in Section 11 of this policy must also be met. SECTION 3. OBJECTIVES OFINVESTMENT POLICY The primary objectives, in order of priority, of all investment activities involving the financial assets of City shall be the following: 1. Safety: Safety and preservation of principal in the overall portfolio is the foremost investment objective. 2. Liquidity: Maintaining the necessary liquidity to match expected liabilities is the second investment objective. 3. Return: Obtaining a reasonable return is the third investment objective. hi investing public funds, the City's cash management portfolio shall be designed with the objective of regularly exceeding the average return on the six-month U.S. Treasury bill. This index is considered a benchmark for the riskless investment transactions and therefore comprises a minimum standard for the portfolio's rate of return. The investment program shall seek to augment returns above this threshold, consistent with risk limitations identified herein and prudent investment principles. The City will diversify its investments to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual financial institutions. SECTION 4. PRUDENCE A. The Finance Director and other authorized staff of the City, when investing or depositing public funds, shall exercise the care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a person acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use to attain the City's investment objectives. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the "prudent person" standard and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and this investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and the liquidity and the sale of securities are carried out in accordance with the terms of this policy. B. The Finance Director and other authorized staff shall utilize competitive bidding for investments where it is prudent to achieve a greater rate of return so long as it does not conflict with the investment objectives stated below. A request for competitive investment proposals should include a request for comparable credit and term investments from a minimum of two investment providers. SECTION 5. INSTRUMENTS ELIGIBLE FOR INVESTMENT Assets of City may be invested in the following: • Interest bearing savings accounts, interest bearing money market accounts, and interest bearing checking accounts at any bank, savings and loan association or credit union in the State of Iowa. Each bank must be on the most recent Approved Bank List as distributed by the Treasurer of the State of Iowa or as amended as necessary by notice inserted in the monthly mailing by the Rate Setting Committee. Each financial institution shall be properly declared as a depository by the governing body of City. Deposits in any financial institution shall not exceed the amount approved by the governing body of the City. • Obligations of the United States government, its agencies and instrumentalities. • Certificates of deposit and other evidences of deposit at federally insured Iowa depository institutions approved and secured pursuant to Iowa Code chapter 12C. • Iowa Public Agency Investment Trust ("IPAIT"). • Prime bankers' acceptances that mature within 270 days of purchase and that are eligible for purchase by a federal reserve bank. • Commercial paper or other short-term corporate debt that matures within 270 days of purchase and is rated within the highest classification, as established by at least one of the standard rating services approved by the Superintendent of Banking. • Repurchase agreements, provided that the underlying collateral consists of obligations of the United States government, its agencies and instrumentalities and takes delivery of the collateral either directly or through an authorized custodian. • An open-end management investment company registered with the Securities & Exchange Commission under the federal Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. Section 80(a), and operated in accordance with 17 C.F.R. Section 270.2a-7, whose portfolio investments are limited to those instruments individually authorized in this Section 5 of this Investment Policy. • Warrants or improvement certificates of a levee or drainage district. • Government sponsored investment pools that meet the requirements of Code of Iowa 1213.10 (5) (a) and must contain only the types of investments allowed by this policy. All instruments eligible for investment are further governed by all other provisions of this Investment Policy, including Section 7 Investment Maturity Limitations and Section 8, Diversification. SECTION 6. PROHIBITED INVESTMENTS AND INVESTMENT PRACTICES Assets of City shall not invested in the following: 1. Reverse repurchase agreements. 2. Futures and options contracts. Assets of City shall not be invested pursuant to the following investment practices: 1. Trading of securities for speculation or the realization of short-term trading gains. 2. Pursuant to a contract providing for the compensation of an agent or fiduciary based upon the performance of the invested assets. 3. Investments not meeting the minimum rate of return set by the State Treasurer of Iowa for Time Deposits If a fiduciary or other third party with custody of public investment transaction records of City fails to produce requested records when requested by City within a reasonable time, the City shall make no new investment with or through the fiduciary or third party and shall not renew maturing investments with or through the fiduciary or third party. SECTION 7. INVESTMENT MATURITY LIMITATIONS Operating Funds must be identified and distinguished from all other funds available for investment. Operating Funds are defined as those funds which are reasonably expected to be expended during a current budget year or within fifteen months of receipt. All investments authorized in Section 5 are further subject to the following investment maturity limitations: Operating Funds may be invested in instruments authorized in Section 5 of this Investment Policy that mature within three hundred ninety-seven (397) days. When the City has or expects to accrue in the current budget year an amount of funds that exceeds operating funds by at least thirty-three (33) percent, it may invest amounts exceeding thirty-three (33) percent of operating funds in certificates of deposit in eligible depository institutions which mature within sixty-three (63) months or less provided that the City invests an amount reasonably expected to be expended during the current budget year or within fifteen months of receipt in investments . 2. The Finance Director may invest funds of the City that are not identified as Operating Funds in investments with maturities longer than three hundred ninety- seven days (397) days. However, all investments of City shall have maturities that are consistent with the needs and use of the City SECTION & DIVERSIFICATION Investments of City are subject to the following diversification requirements: Prime bankers' acceptances: 1. At the time of purchase, no more than ten percent (10%) of the investment portfolio of City shall be invested in prime bankers' acceptances; and 2. At the time of purchase, no more than five percent (5%) of the investment portfolio of City shall be invested in the securities of a single issuer. Commercial paper or other short-term corporate debt: 1. At the time of purchase, no more than ten percent (10%) of the investment portfolio of City shall be in commercial paper or other short term corporate debt. 2. At the time of purchase, no more than five percent (5%) of the investment portfolio of City shall be invested in the securities of a single issuer. Where possible, it is the policy of City to diversify its investment portfolio. Assets shall be diversified to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from overconcentration of assets in a specific maturity, a specific issuer, or a specific class of securities. In establishing specific diversification strategies, the following general policies and constraints shall apply: 1. Portfolio maturities shall be staggered in a way that avoids undue concentration of assets in a specific maturity sector. Maturities shall be selected which provide stability of income and reasonable liquidity. 2. Liquidity practices to ensure that the next disbursement date and payroll date are covered through maturing investments, marketable U.S. Treasury bills or cash on hand shall be used at all times. 3. Risks of market price volatility shall be controlled through maturity diversification so that aggregate price losses on Instruments with maturities approaching one year shall not be greater than coupon interest and Investment Income received from the balance of the portfolio. SECTION 9. STATE OF IOWA SINKING FUND Section 12C.25 of the Code of Iowa created the state sinking fund to protect public funds on deposit in Iowa banks, savings associations, and credit unions. This is in addition to Iowa Code Section 12C.22(2) which requires Iowa banks to pledge collateral for public deposits equal to or in excess of the total amount by which the public funds deposits in the bank exceeds the total capital of the bank. Section 12C.23A describes the procedures that the State Treasurer of Iowa would implement if a bank were closed. The following are the levels of protection in order: The Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures all public deposits up to a predetermined level and is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. Secondly, assets of the closed bank are liquidated to cover losses. Next, monies in the state sinking fund are distributed to entities that had deposits with the closed bank. If the balance in the sinking fund is inadequate to pay the entire loss, then the State Treasurer shall obtain the additional amount needed by making an assessment against other banks whose public funds deposits exceed deposit insurance coverage. SECTION I0. SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY All invested assets of City involving the use of a public funds custodial agreement, as defined in Iowa Code section 12B.1 OC, shall comply with all rules adopted pursuant to Iowa Code section 12B.1 OC. All custodial agreements shall be in writing. All invested assets of City eligible for physical delivery shall be secured by having them held at a third -party custodian. All purchased investments shall be held pursuant to a written third -party custodial agreement requiring delivery versus payment and compliance with all rules set out in this Section. SECTION IL AUTHORIZED FINANCLIL DEALERS The Finance Director will maintain a list of qualified security broker/dealers who are authorized to provide investment services in the State of Iowa. These may include "primary" dealers or regional dealers that qualify under Securities & Exchange Commission Rule 15C3-1 (uniform net capital rule). All broker/dealers who desire to become approved bidders for investment transactions must provide the Finance Director with the following: • The firm's most recent audited annual financial statements • Proof of the firm's designation by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as a primary securities dealer or proof of FDIC coverage • Proof of sales licenses for individuals servicing the City's account • Proof of the firm's State of Iowa securities sales license The broker/dealers must comply with the above requirements by a deadline established by the Finance Director in order to continue to have the opportunity to conduct business with the City. The Finance Director may create additional registration or application requirements if deemed necessary, but they must be applied equally to all broker/dealers. The Finance Director will monitor the creditworthiness of the broker/dealers on an ongoing basis as information becomes publicly available. Broker/dealers shall not be compensated based on investment performance SECTION 12. ETHICS AND CONFLICT OFINTEREST Employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Employees shall disclose any material financial interests in financial institutions with which they conduct business, and they shall further disclose any large personal financial/investment positions that could be related to the performance of the investment portfolio SECTION 13. REPORTING The Senior Accountant -Revenue shall submit an investment report quarterly to the Finance Director, the City Manager, and the City Council. The report will report investments by fund, institution and maturity date and will also include the activity of investments purchased and redeemed during the quarter. The report will include the average rate of return over the past quarter and compare the return against appropriate benchmarks as determined by the Finance Director. SECTION 14. INVESTMENT POLICYREVIEWAND AMENDMENT This Investment Policy shall be reviewed every three (3) years or more frequently as appropriate. Notice of amendments to the Investment Policy shall be promptly given to all parties noted in Section 1. GLOSSARY ACCRUED INTEREST: The accumulated interest payable on a security since the last interest payment made by the issuer. AGENCY: A debt security issued by a federal or federally sponsored agency. Federal agencies are backed by the full faith and credit of the U. S. Government. Federally sponsored agencies (FSAs) are backed by each particular agency with a market perception that there is an implicit government guarantee. An example of a federal agency is the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). An example of an FSA is the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). AMORTIZATION: The systematic reduction of the amount owed on a debt issue through periodic payments of principal. ASKED: The price at which securities are offered. BANKERS' ACCEPTANCE (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. BASIS POINT: A unit of measurement used in the valuation of fixed-income securities equal to 1/100 of I percent of yield, e.g., "1/4" of 1 percent is equal to 25 basis points. BENCHMARK: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio's investment. BID: The price offered by a buyer of securities. (When you are selling securities, you ask for a bid.) See Offer. BOOK ENTRY: An electronic system of accountability, custody, transfer, and settlement of securities. Book -entry systems allow rapid and accurate transfers of securities with simultaneous cash settlement. BOOK VALUE: The value at which a security is carried on the inventory lists or other financial records of an investor. The book value may differ significantly from the security's current value in the market. BROKER/DEALER: A broker/dealer brings buyers and sellers together for a commission. CALLABLE BOND: A bond issue in which all or part of its outstanding principal amount may be redeemed before maturity by the issuer under specified conditions. CALL PRICE: The price at which an issuer may redeem a bond prior to maturity. The price is usually at a slight premium to the bond's original issue price to compensate the holder for loss of income and ownership. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT (CD): A time deposit with a specific maturity evidenced by a certificate. Large -denomination CDs are typically negotiable. CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT ACCOUNT REGISTRY SERVICE (CDARS): A program with an approved depository that removes the need for collateral by providing full FDIC insurance for certificates of deposit. COLLATERAL: Securities, evidence of deposit or other property which a borrower pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposits of public monies. COLLATERLIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATION (CMO): Mortgage backed bond that separates mortgage pools into different maturity classes called tranches. CMO's are issued by Federal National Mortgage Corp. and Federal National Mortgage Association and are usually backed with a government guarantee and have an AAA bond rating. Planned Amortization Class CMOs (PAC) have stable prepayment schedules that do not react unfavorably in wide market swings. COMMERCIAL PAPER: An unsecured short-term promissory note issued by corporations, with maturities ranging from 2 to 270 days. COUPON: (a) The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. (b) A certificate attached to a bond evidencing interest due on a payment date. CREDIT QUALITY: The measurement of the financial strength of a bond issuer. This measurement helps an investor to understand an issuer's ability to make timely interest payments and repay the loan principal upon maturity. Generally, the higher the credit quality of a bond issuer, the lower the interest rate paid by the issuer because the risk of default is lower. Credit quality ratings are provided by nationally recognized rating agencies. CREDIT RISK: The risk to an investor that an issuer will default in the payment of interest and/or principal on a security. CURRENT YIELD (CURRENT RETURN): A yield calculation determined by dividing the annual interest received on a security by the current market price of that security. CUSTODIAN: A custodian or custodian bank is a financial institution that holds customers' securities for safekeeping to prevent them from being stolen or lost. The custodian may hold stocks or other assets in electronic or physical form. DEBENTURE: A bond secured only by the general credit of the issuer. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT: There are two methods of delivery of securities: delivery versus payment and delivery versus receipt. Delivery versus payment is delivery of securities with an exchange of money for the securities. Delivery versus receipt is delivery of securities with an exchange of a signed receipt for the securities. DERIVATIVES: (1) Financial instruments whose return profile is linked to, or derived from, the movement of one or more underlying index or security, and may include a leveraging factor; or (2) financial contracts based upon notional amounts whose value is derived from an underlying index or security (interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equities or commodities). DISCOUNT: The difference between the cost price of a security and its maturity when quoted at lower than face value. A security selling below original offering price shortly after sale also is considered to be at a discount. DISCOUNT SECURITIES: Non-interest bearing money market instruments that are issued at a discount and redeemed at maturity for full face value, e.g., U. S. Treasury Bills. DIVERSIFICATION: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns. DURATION: A measure of the timing of the cash flows, such as the interest payments and the principal repayment, to be received from a given fixed-income security. This calculation is based on three variables; term to maturity, coupon rate, and yield to maturity. The duration of a security is a useful indicator of its price volatility for given changes in interest rates. FAIR VALUE: The amount at which an investment could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. FEDERAL CREDIT AGENCIES: Agencies of the Federal government set up to supply credit to various classes of institutions and individuals, e.g., S&Ls, small business firms, students, farmers, farm cooperatives, and exporters. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION (FDIC): A federal agency that insures bank deposits, currently up to $250,000 per deposit. FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK (FFCB): The FFCB Funding Corporation, established by Congress, currently utilizes a selling group of 30 banks and securities dealers that may offer Fane Credit Debt Securities. The Funding Corporation selling group distributes these Farm Credit Debt Securities on a worldwide basis to all types of investors, including commercial banks, states, municipalities, pension and money-market funds, insurance companies, investment advisers, corporations, foreign banks and governments, and other investors. FEDERAL FUNDS (Fed Funds): Funds placed in Federal Reserve banks by depository institutions in excess of current reserve requirements. These depository institutions may lend fed funds to each other overnight or on a longer basis. They may also transfer funds among each other on a same-day basis through the Federal Reserve banking system. Fed funds are considered to be immediately available funds. FEDERAL FUNDS RATE: The rate of interest at which Fed funds are traded. This rate is currently pegged by the Federal Reserve through open -market operations. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS (FHLB): Government sponsored wholesale banks (currently 12 regional banks) which lend funds and provide correspondent banking services to member commercial banks, thrift institutions, credit unions and insurance companies. The mission of the FHLBS is to liquefy the housing related assets of its members who must purchase stock in their district bank. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION (FHLMC): Established to help maintain the availability of mortgage credit for residential housing. Participation is in the conventional loan market. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (FNMA): FNMA, like GNMA, was chartered under the Federal National Mortgage Association Act in 1938. FNMA is a federal corporation working under the auspices of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It is the largest single provider of residential mortgage funds in the United States. Fannie Mae, as the corporation is called, is a private stockholder -owned corporation. The corporation's purchases include a variety of adjustable mortgages and second loans, in addition to fixed-rate mortgages. FNMA's securities are also highly liquid and are widely accepted. FNMA assumes and guarantees that all security holders will receive timely payment of principal and interest. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC): Consists of seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank Presidents. The President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank is a permanent member, while the other Presidents serve on a rotating basis. The Committee periodically meets to set Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of Government Securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money. FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM: The central bank of the United States created by Congress and consisting of a seven member Board of Governors in Washington, D. C., 12 regional banks and about 5,700 commercial banks that are members of the system. FIDUCIARY: Person, company, or association holding assets in trust of a beneficiary. FUTURES CONTRACT: Agreement to buy or sell a specific amount of a commodity or financial instrument at a particular price on a stipulated future date. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA OR GINNIE MAE): Securities influencing the volume of bank credit guaranteed by GNMA and issued by mortgage bankers, commercial banks, savings and loan associations, and other institutions. Security holder is protected by full faith and credit of the U. S. Government. Ginnie Mae securities are backed by the FHA, VA or FmHA mortgages. The term "pass- through" is often used to describe Ginnie Maes. INVERTED YIELD CURVE: A chart formation that illustrates long-term securities having lower yields than short-term securities. This configuration usually occurs during periods of high inflation coupled with low levels of confidence in the economy and a restrictive monetary policy. INVESTMENT-GRADE OBLIGATIONS: An investment instrument suitable for purchase by institutional investors under the prudent person rule. Investment-grade is restricted to those obligations rated BBB or higher by a rating agency. INVESTMENT POOL: Institutional units that are organized financial arrangements, excluding pension funds, that consolidate Other Financial Intermediaries investor funds for the purpose of acquiring financial assets. Investors usually purchase shares representing fixed proportions of the fund. IPAIT (IOWA PUBLIC AGENCY INVESTMENT TRUST): The Iowa Public Agency Investment Trust ("IPAIT" or "Trust") is a professionally managed common law trust created with the objective of providing Iowa cities, counties, city utilities, and other eligible participants (the 'Participants") with a convenient method for investing their funds in a manner that focuses on safety of principal and liquidity for operating funds, while maximizing current income consistent with those parameters. IPAIT has been established under Iowa law pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 28E and Sections 331.555 and 384.21, which authorize Iowa cities, counties, city utilities, and other eligible participants to jointly invest monies pursuant to a joint investment agreement. LIQUIDITY: A liquid asset is one that can be converted easily and rapidly into cash without a substantial loss of value. In the money market, a security is said to be liquid if the spread between bid and asked prices is narrow and reasonable size can be done at those quotes. MARK -TO -MARKET: The process whereby the book value or collateral value of a security is adjusted to reflect its current market value. MARKET RISK: The risk that the value of a security will rise or decline as a result of changes in market conditions. MARKET VALUE: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT: A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase ---reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party's rights in the transactions. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer -lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller -borrower. MATURITY: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. MONEY MARKET: The market in which short -tern debt instruments (bills, commercial paper, bankers' acceptances, etc.) are issued and traded. OFFER: The price asked by a seller of securities. (When you are buying securities, you ask for an offer.) See Asked and Bid. OPTION: Right to buy or sell property that is granted in exchange for an agreed upon sum. If the right is not exercised after a specified period, the option expires and the option buyer forfeits the money. PORTFOLIO: Collection of securities held by an investor PRIMARY DEALER: A group of government securities dealers who submit daily reports of market activity and positions and monthly financial statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Primary dealers include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) -registered securities broker-dealers, banks, and a few unregulated firms. PRUDENT PERSON RULE: An investment standard. In some states the law requires that a fiduciary, such as a trustee, may invest money only in a list of securities selected by the custody state ---the so-called legal list. In other states the trustee may invest in a security if it is one which would be bought by a prudent person of discretion and intelligence who is seeking a reasonable income and preservation of capital. RATE OF RETURN: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity. REINVESTMENT RISK: The risk that a fixed-income investor will be unable to reinvest income proceeds from a security holding at the same rate of return currently generated by that holding. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (RP OR REPO): A holder of securities sells these securities to an investor with an agreement to repurchase them at a fixed price on a fixed date. The security "buyer" in effect lends the "seller" money for the period of the agreement, and the terms of the agreement are structured to compensate him for this. Dealers use RP extensively to finance their positions. Exception: When the Fed is said to be doing RP, it is lending money that is, increasing bank reserves. SAFEKEEPING: A service to customers rendered by banks for a fee whereby securities and valuables of all types and descriptions are held in the bank's vaults for protection. SEC RULE 15C3-1: See Uniform Net Capital Rule. SECONDARY MARKET: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION: Agency created by Congress to protect investors in securities transactions by administering securities legislation. SPECULATION: Assumption of risk in anticipation of gain but recognizing a higher than average possibility of loss. STRUCTURED NOTES: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, etc.) and corporations which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative -based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. SWAP: Trading one asset for another. TOTAL RETURN: The sum of all investment income plus changes in the capital value of the portfolio. For mutual funds, return on an investment is composed of share price appreciation plus any realized dividends or capital gains. This is calculated by taking the following components during a certain time period. (Price Appreciation) + (Dividends Paid) + (Capital Gains) = Total Return TREASURY BILLS: A non-interest bearing discount security issued by the U. S. Treasury to finance the national debt. Most bills are issued to mature in three months, six months, or one year. TREASURY BONDS: Long-term coupon -bearing U. S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U. S. Government and having initial maturities of more than ten years. TREASURY NOTES: Medium-term coupon -bearing U. S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U. S. Government and having initial maturities from two to ten years. UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE: Securities and Exchange Commission requirement that member firms as well as nonmember broker-dealers in securities maintain a maximum ratio of indebtedness to liquid capital of 15 to 1; also called net capital rule and net capital ratio. Indebtedness covers all money owed to a firm, including margin loans and commitments to purchase securities, one reason new public issues are spread among members of underwriting syndicates. Liquid capital includes cash and assets easily converted into cash. VOLATILITY: A degree of fluctuation in the price and valuation of securities WEIGHTED AVERAGE MATURITY (WAM): The average maturity of all the securities that comprise a portfolio. According to SEC rule 2a-7, the WAM for SEC registered money market mutual funds may not exceed 90 days and no one security may have a maturity that exceeds 397 days. WHEN ISSUED (WI): A conditional transaction in which an authorized new security has not been issued. All "when issued" transactions are settled when the actual security is issued. YIELD: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. (a) INCOME YIELD is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price for the security. (b) NET YIELD or YIELD TO MATURITY is the current income yield minus any premium above par or plus any discount from par in purchase price, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond. YIELD CURVE: A graphic representation that depicts the relationship at a given point in time between yields and maturity for bonds that are identical in every way except maturity. A normal yield curve may be alternatively referred to as a positive yield curve. YIELD -TO -CALL (YTC): The rate of return an investor earns from a bond assuming the bond is redeemed (called) prior to its nominal maturity date. YIELD -TO -MATURITY: The rate of return yielded by a debt security held to maturity when both interest payments and the investor's potential capital gain or loss are included in the calculation of return. ZERO-COUPON SECURITIES: Security that is issued at a discount and makes no periodic interest payments. The rate of return consists of a gradual accretion of the principal of the security and is payable at par upon maturity. Item Number: 7.e. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution correcting the final contract amount reimbursing CRANDIC for work performed on the Burlington and Madison Intersection Improvements Project. Prepared By: Jason Reichart, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $187,422.75 available in the Burlington & Madison Intersection Improvements account #S3834 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: A resolution requesting Council authorization for the contract to exceed $150,000, as required by the current Purchasing Policy was approved at the April 20th City Council Meeting (Resolution No. 21-104). However, the amount included in said resolution was incorrectly stated as $181,422.75. This resolution corrects the final reimbursement amount to be $187,422.75. Background /Analysis: The City entered into an agreement with Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Company (CRANDIC) to complete public improvements on railroad right-of-way as part of the Burlington and Madison Intersection Improvements Project. As detailed the agreement, the City would reimburse CRANDIC for at grade railroad crossing improvements in the amount of $131,583.41. However, during construction, extensive sanitary sewer repairs required the removal and replacement of additional railroad infrastructure, thereby expanding the scope of services provided by CRANDIC and increasing the cost to be reimbursed by the City to $187,422.75. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Jason Reichert, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240.(319)356-5436 Resolution No. 21-129 Resolution correcting the final contract amount reimbursing CRANDIC for work performed on the Burlington and Madison Intersection Improvements Project. Whereas, the City entered into an agreement on September 26, 2019 with Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Company (CRANDIC) to construct public improvements on railroad right-of-way as part of the Burlington and Madison Intersection Improvements Project; and Whereas, reimbursement for this work was approved by Resolution No. 21-104 but the final reimbursement amount was inaccurately stated therein; and Whereas, the final reimbursement amount is $187,422.75; and Whereas, this resolution is to correct the final reimbursement amount; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Burlington & Madison Intersection Improvements account #S3834; and Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The final reimbursement amount of $187,422.75 is approved. Passed and approved this 18th day of May '2021. Mgylor Approved Oy Attest: City Clerk City om s Ice — 05/13/2021 It was moved by Tho as, seconded b Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: x Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 7.f. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution Appointing Paying Agent, Bond Registrar, and Transfer Agent, Approving the Paying Agent and Bond Registrar and Transfer Agent Agreement and Authorizing the Execution of the Agreement. Prepared By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Reviewed By: Ashley Monroe, Assistant to the City Manager Fiscal Impact: Adopted as part of the FY2021 Revised Budget and 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Program Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Agreement Relating to Paying Agency, Registrar and Transfer Agency Resolution Executive Summary: On the May 18 City Council agenda, there are two separate resolutions for the City Council to consider in order to complete the sale of the 2021 General Obligation Bonds. The first resolution appoints US Bank as the registrar and paying agent for the 2021 General Obligation Bonds and authorizes the execution of an agreement with them for these services. The second resolution approves the tax exemption certificate, the continuing disclosure certificate and authorizes the issuance of the 2021 General Obligation Bonds. The resolution also amends the tax levy requirements needed for the repayment of the bonds. Background /Analysis: On May 4, 2021, the City sold the 2021 General Obligation Bonds at a par amount of $11,325,000. The City received four bids on the 2021 General Obligation Bonds from KeyBanc Capital Markets, Robert W. Baird & Company, Hilltop Securities, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith. The lowest true interest rate bid was received from KeyBanc Capital Markets of Denver, Colorado at 1.0645% and a price of $12,744,378.15. The 2021 General Obligation Bonds are 10 -year bonds that mature in 2031. ATTACHMENTS: Description Agreement Relating to Paying Agency, Registrar and Transfer Agency Resolution AGREEMENT RELATING TO PAYING AGENCY, REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENCY THIS PAYING AGENT/BOND REGISTRAR AGREEMENT (this "Agreement"), is entered into as of June 1, 2021 by and between the City of Iowa City, Iowa (the "Issuer"), and U.S. Bank National Association ('Bank"), as Paying Agent and Bond Registrar. RECITALS WHEREAS the Issuer has duly authorized and provided for the issuance of its Bonds, entitled General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 (the 'Bonds") in an aggregate principal amount of $11,325,000 to be issued as fully registered bonds without coupons; WHEREAS the Issuer will ensure all things necessary to make the Bonds the valid obligations of the Issuer, in accordance with their terms, will be done upon the issuance and delivery thereof; WHEREAS the Issuer and the Bank wish to provide the terms under which Bank will act as Paying Agent to pay the principal, redemption premium (if any) and interest on the Bonds, in accordance with the terms thereof, and under which the Bank will act as Registrar for the Bonds; WHEREAS the Bank has agreed to serve in such capacities for and on behalf of the Issuer and has full power and authority to perform and serve as Paying Agent and Bond Registrar for the Bonds; WHEREAS the Issuer has duly authorized the execution and delivery of this Agreement; and all things necessary to make this Agreement a valid agreement have been done. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: ARTICLE ONE DEFINITIONS Section 1.01. Definitions. For all purposes of this Agreement except as otherwise expressly provided or unless the context otherwise requires: Definition of Terms. The terms "item", "receipt", "transfer", "turnaround", "process", "business day", and other terms used throughout the Agreement shall be deemed to have the meanings provided in Rules 17Ad-1 and 17Ad-2 of the Regulations promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 76.10(4) of the Code of Iowa, as amended and in effect from time to time. "Bank" means U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America. "Bond Register" means the book or books of registration kept by the Bank 1n which are maintained the names and addresses and principal amounts registered to each Registered Owner. "Fiscal Year" means the fiscal year of the Issuer ending on June 30 of each year. "Issuer" means City of Iowa City, Iowa. "Paying Agent" or "Agent" means the Bank when it is performing the function of paying agent for the Bonds. "Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, joint stock company, trust, unincorporated organization or government or any agency or political subdivision of a government or any entity whatsoever. "Registered Owner" means a Person in whose name a Bond is registered in the Bond Register. "Registrar" means the Bank when it is performing the function of registrar for the Bonds. "Stated Maturity" when used with respect to any Bond means the date specified in the Bond as the date on which the principal of such Bond is due and payable. ARTICLE TWO APPOINTMENT OF BANK AS PAYING AGENT AND BOND REGISTRAR Section 2.01. Appointment and Acceptance. The Issuer hereby appoints the Bank to act as Paying Agent with respect to the Bonds, to pay to the Registered Owners in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement the principal of, redemption premium (if any), and interest on all or any of the Bonds. The Issuer hereby appoints the Bank as Registrar with respect to the Bonds. As Registrar, the Bank shall keep and maintain for and on behalf of the Issuer, books and records as to the ownership of the Bonds and with respect to the transfer and exchange thereof as herein provided. The Bank hereby accepts its appointment, and agrees to act as Paying Agent and Bond Registrar. Section 2.02. Compensation. As compensation for the Bank's services as Paying Agent and Bond Registrar, the Issuer hereby agrees to pay the Bank the fees and amounts set forth in the Bank's proposal for paying agent/registrar services dated March 12, 2015. In addition, the Issuer agrees to reimburse the Bank, upon its request, for all reasonable and necessary out-of- pocket expenses, disbursements, and advances, including without limitation the reasonable fees, expenses, and disbursements made or incurred by the Bank in connection with entering into and performing under this Agreement. ARTICLE THREE PAYING AGENT Section 3.01. Duties of Paying Agent. As Paying Agent, the Bank, provided sufficient collected funds have been provided to it for such purpose by or on behalf of the Issuer, shall pay on behalf of the Issuer the principal of, redemption premium, if any, and interest on each Bond in accordance with the provisions of the Bond. Section 3.02. Payment Dates. The Issuer hereby instructs the Bank to pay the principal of, redemption premium (if any) and interest on the Bonds, to the extent such funds have herein been provided by the Issuer, as follows: (a) The Issuer hereby agrees to provide the Paying Agent with sufficient funds to make principal and interest payments as follows: (1) payment by check must be received by the Paying Agent at least 5 business days prior to payment date and (2) payment by wire must be received by the Paying Agent by the payment date and no later than 11:30 a.m. CST. (b) On each payment date Agent will pay interest and, upon presentation and surrender of the matured or called Obligations, will pay principal to each registered owner of the Obligations as of the record date by mailing a check to each such owner. In any case where the date of maturity of interest on or principal of the Obligations or the date fixed for redemption of any Obligations shall be a Sunday or a legal holiday or a day on which the banking institutions are authorized by law to close, then payment of interest or principal may be made on the succeeding business day with the same force and effect as if made on the date of maturity or the date fixed for redemption. Provided, however, that payment of principal shall be made not later than the second day after receipt of the matured Obligation (c) When the Agent shall receive notice from Issuer of its option to redeem Obligations prior to maturity, the Agent shall select the Obligations to be redeemed and give notice of the redemption thereof, all in accordance with the terms of the Obligations and the Resolution. The Bank shall not be required to pay interest on any funds of the Issuer for any period during which such funds are held bythe Bank awaiting the presentation of the Bonds for payment. ARTICLE FOUR REGISTRAR Section 4.01. Initial Delivery of Bonds. The Bonds will be initially registered and delivered to the purchaser designated by the Issuer as one Bond for each maturity. If such purchaser delivers a written request to the Bank not later than five business days prior to the date of initial delivery, the Bank will, on the date of initial delivery, deliver Bonds of authorized denominations, registered in accordance with the instructions in such written request. Section 4.02. Duties of Registrar.The Bank shall provide for the proper registration of transfer, exchange and replacement of the Bonds. Every Bond surrendered for transfer or exchange shall be duly endorsed or be accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, the signature on which has been guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution, in form acceptable to the Bank, duly executed by the Registered Owner thereof or his attorney duly authorized in writing. The Registrar may request any supporting documentation it deems necessary or appropriate to affect a re -registration. Bank shall comply at all times with such rules, regulations, and requirements as may govern the registration, transfer and payment of registered Bonds including without limitation Chapters 76, 384, 554.8101 et seq. Code of Iowa and standards issued from time to time by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board of the United States and any other securities industry standard and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. For purposes of determining the registered owners of the Bonds, the record date shall be deemed to be the fifteenth day of the month preceding the date on which payment of principal, premium, if any, or interest is payable to the registered owners of the Bonds ("payment date") whether such payment is due to optional redemption, operation of a sinking fund, or for any other reason. Bank agrees that it will turnaround within three business days of receipt all items received in proper form for transfer, process or other action pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. Bank will promptly cancel and deliver to Issuer all Bonds or certificates representing the Bonds surrendered to it upon payment of the principal, premium, if any, and interest owing on such Bonds. In the event any payment check representing payment of interest or principal on the Bonds is returned to the Bank or is not presented for payment, or if any Bonds is not presented for payment of principal or premium, if any, at the maturity or redemption date, if funds sufficient to pay such interest on Bonds shall have been made available to the Bank for the benefit of the owner thereof, all liability of the Issuer to the owner thereof for such interest or payment of such Bonds shall forthwith cease, terminate and be completely discharged, and thereupon it shall be the duty of the Bank to hold such funds, without liability for interest thereon, for the benefit of the owner of such Bonds who shall thereafter be restricted exclusively to such funds for any claim of whatever nature on his part under this Agreement or on, or with respect to, such interest or Bonds. The Bank's obligation to hold such funds shall continue for a period equal to two years and six months following the date on which such interest or principal became due, whether at maturity, or at the date fixed for redemption thereof, or otherwise, at which time the Bank, shall surrender any remaining funds so held to the Issuer, whereupon any claim under this Agreement by the Owners of such interest or Bonds of whatever nature shall be made upon the Issuer. Section 4.03. Unauthenticated Bonds. The Issuer shall provide to the Bank on a continuing basis, an adequate inventory of unauthenticated Bonds to facilitate transfers. The Bank agrees that it will maintain such unauthenticated Bonds in safekeeping. Section 4.04. Form of Bond Re sig ter. The Bank as Registrar will maintain its records as Bond Registrar in accordance with standards issued from time to time by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board of the United States and any other securities industry standard and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and Chapter 76 of the Code of Iowa. Section 4.05. Reports. The records of Bank shall be in such form as to be in compliance with standards issued from time to time by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board of the United States and any other securities industry standard and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and Chapter 76 of the Code of Iowa. Bank's records in connection with the Bonds shall remain confidential records entitled to protection and confidentiality pursuant to Section 22.7(17), Code of Iowa. Agent agrees that its use of the records will be limited to the purposes of this Agreement and that Agent will make no private use or permit any private access thereto. The Bank will not release or disclose the content of the Bond Register to any person other than to the Issuer at its written request, except upon receipt of a subpoena or court order or as may otherwise be required by law. Upon receipt of a subpoena or court order the Bank will notify the Issuer. Section 4.06. Cancelled Bonds. All Bonds surrendered for payment, redemption, transfer, exchange, or replacement, if surrendered to the Bank, shall be promptly cancelled by it and, if surrendered to the Issuer, shall be delivered to the Bank and, if not already cancelled, shall be promptly cancelled by the Bank. The Issuer may at any time deliver to the Bank for cancellation any Bonds previously authenticated and delivered which the Issuer may have acquired in any manner whatsoever, and all Bonds so delivered shall be promptly cancelled by the Bank. All cancelled Bonds held by the Bank for its retention period then in effect and shall thereafter be returned tothe Issuer. Section 4.07. Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Bank shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Bank in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing by the owner with the Bank of evidence satisfactory to the Bank that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Bank of an appropriate bond of indemnity in form, substance and amount as may be required by law and as is satisfactory to the Bank. All Bonds so surrendered to the Bank shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the Issuer. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment, provided that the owner shall first provide the Bank with a bond of indemnity as set forthabove. ARTICLE FIVE THE BANK Section 5.01. Duties of Bank. The Bank undertakes to perform the duties set forth herein. No implied duties or obligations shall be read into this Agreement against the Bank. The Bank hereby agrees to use the funds deposited with it for payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds to pay the same as it shall become due and further agrees to establish and maintain such accounts and funds as may be required for the Bank to function as Paying Agent. Section 5.02. Reliance on Documents, Etc. (a) The Bank may conclusively rely, as to the truth of the statements and correctness of the opinions expressed therein, on certificates or opinions expressed therein, on certificates or opinions furnished to the Bank by the Issuer. (b) Bank may rely conclusively and act, without further investigation, upon any list, instruction, certification, authorization, certificate or other instrument or paper suitably guaranteed and believed by it in good faith and due diligence in performing its functions to be genuine and to have been signed, countersigned or executed by any duly authorized person or persons or upon the instruction of any authorized officer of Issuer or upon the advice of Issuer's counsel; and may register any certificate representing the Bonds or may refuse to register any such certificate if in good faith Bank deems such refusal necessary in order to avoid any liability on the part of either Issuer or Bank, and Issuer agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Bank from and against any and all losses, costs, claims and liability for so relying or acting or refusing to act. (c) No provision of this Agreement shall require the Bank to expend or risk or use its own funds for performance of any of its duties hereunder (d) The Bank may consult with counsel for the Issuer, and the written advice or opinion of counsel for the Issuer shall be full authorization and protection with respect to any action taken, suffered or omitted by it hereunder in good faith and reliance thereon. (e) The Bank shall not be responsible for delays or failures in performance resulting from acts beyond its control, including without limitation acts of God, strikes, lockouts, riots, acts of war or terror, epidemics, governmental regulations, fire, communication line failures, computer viruses, power failures, earthquakes or other disasters. (0 The Bank is authorized, to comply with final orders issued or process entered by any court of competent jurisdiction with respect to any money held by the Bank hereunder. If any portion of money held by the Bank hereunder is at any time attached, garnished or levied upon under any court order, or in case the payment, assignment, transfer, conveyance or delivery of any such property shall be stayed or enjoined by any court order, or in case any order, judgment or decree shall be made or entered by any court affecting such property or any part thereof, then and in any such event, the Bank is authorized, to rely upon and comply with any such order, writ, judgment or decree which it is advised by legal counsel selected by the Issuer; and if the Bank complies with any such order, writ, judgment or decree, it shall not be liable to any of the parties hereto or to any other person or entity by reason of such compliance even though such order, writ, judgment or decree may be subsequently reversed, modified, annulled, set aside or vacated. Section 5.03. Recitals of Issuer. The recitals contained in the Bonds shall be taken as the statements of the Issuer, and the Bank assumes no responsibility for their correctness. Section 5.04. May Own Bonds. The Bank, in its individual or any other capacity, may become the owner or pledgee of Bonds with the same rights it would have if it were not the Paying Agent and Bond Registrar for the Bonds. Section 5.05. Money Held by Bank. Money held by the Bank hereunder need not be segregated from other funds. The Bank shall have no duties with respect to investment of funds deposited with it and shall be under no obligation to pay interest on any money received by it hereunder. Any money deposited with or otherwise held by the Bank for the payment of the principal, redemption premium (if any) or interest on any Bond and remaining unclaimed, by the Registered Owner (or by the Issuer (which claim by the Issuer shall be made in writing) after maturity and prior to escheatment) will be escheated pursuant to Iowa law. If funds are returned to the Issuer, the Issuer and the Bank agree that the Registered Owner of such Bond shall thereafter look only to the Issuer for payment thereof, and that all liability of the Bank with respect to such moneys shall thereupon cease. Section 5.06. Other Transactions. The Bank may engage in or be interested in any financial or other transaction with the Issuer. Section 5.07. Interpleader. The Issuer and the Bank agree that the Bank may seek adjudication of any adverse claim, demand, or controversy over its person as well as funds on deposit, in a court situated in Johnson County Iowa. The Issuer and the Bank further agree that the Bank has the right to file an action in interpleader in any court situated in Johnson County Iowa to determine the rights of any person claiming any interest herein. Section 5.08 Insurance. The Bank shall carry insurance in the types and amounts for the duration of this agreement as listed in the Issuer's request for paying agent/registrar services dated February 20, 2015. ARTICLE SIX MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Section 6.01. Amendment. This Agreement maybe amended only by an agreement in writing signed by both of the parties hereto. Section 6.02. Assianment. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent of the other party. Section 6.03. Notices. Any request, demand, authorization, direction, notice, consent, waiver or other document provided or permitted hereby to be given or furnished to the Issuer or the Bank shall be mailed, faxed, sent pdf or delivered to the Issuer or the Bank, respectively, at the address shown below, or such other address as may have been given by one party to the other by fifteen (15) days writtennotice: If to the Issuer: City of Iowa City, Iowa, Finance Department Mr. Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240-1826 Facsimile: 319-341-4008 If to the Bank: U.S. Bank National Association 60 Livingston Avenue St. Paul MN 55107 Facsimile: 651-466-7431 Section 6.04. Effect of Headings. The Article and Section headings herein are for convenience of reference only and shall not affect the construction hereof. Section 6.05. Successors and Assigns. All covenants and agreements herein by the Issuer and the Bank shall bind their successors and assigns, whether so expressed or not. Section 6.06. SeverabilityIf any provision of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. Section 6.07. Benefits of Agreement. Nothing herein, express or implied, shall give to any Person, other than the parties hereto and their successors hereunder, any benefit or any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim hereunder. Section 6.08. Entire Agreement. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties hereto relative to the Bank acting as Paying Agent and Bond Registrar. Section 6.09. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Section 6.10. Term and Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by either party by giving the other party at least 90 days advance written notice. At termination of the Agreement, Agent shall deliver to Issuer any and all records, documents or other writings made or accumulated in the performance of its duties under this Agreement and shall refund the unearned balance, if any, of fees paid in advance by Issuer. If the Bank shall resign, or become incapable of acting, the Issuer shall promptly appoint a successor Paying Agent and Bond Registrar Section 6.11. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Iowa. Section 6.12. Documents to be Filed with Bank. At the time of the Bank's appointment as Paying Agent and Bond Registrar, the Issuer shall file with the Bank the following documents: (a) a specimen Bond; (b) a copy of the opinion of bond counsel provided to the Issuer in connection with the issuance of the Bonds; and (c) such other relevant information that the Bank may request. Section 6.13. Patriot Act Compliance. To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, Federal law requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. For a non -individual person such as a business entity, a charity, a Trust or other legal entity we will ask for documentation to verify its formation and existence as a legal entity. We may also ask to see financial statements, licenses, identification and authorization documents from individuals claiming authority to represent the entity or other relevant documentation. Section 6.14. Examination of Records. Issuer or its duly authorized agents may examine all records relating to the Obligations at the principal office of the Agent at reasonable times as agreed upon with the Agent and such records shall be subject to audit from time to time at the request of Issuer or Agent. The Agent, on request, will furnish Issuer with a list of the names, addresses, and other information concerning the owners of the Obligations or any of them. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer and the Bank have caused this agreement to be executed in their respective names by their duly authorized representatives, in two counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. City of Iowa City,, Iowa, Issuer j_ By: X� / Print Name: Bruce Teague Title: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Paying Agent, Registrar and Transfer Agent M Authorized Representative Print Name: Jason R IJressel Title: Assistant Vice President bank. U.S. Bank Customer Confidential Schedule of Fees for Services as Paying Agent CTS01010A Acceptance Fee The acceptance fee includes the administrative review of 325.00 documents, initial set-up of the account, and other reasonably required services up to and including the closing. This is a one-time, non-refundable fee, payable at closing. CTS04110 Paying Agent / Registrar / Transfer Agent Annual fee for the standard 375.00 transfer agent, registrar, and paying agent services associated with the administration of the account. Administration fees are payable in advance. Direct Out of Pocket Expenses Reimbursement of expenses associated with At Cost the performance of our duties, including but not limited to publications, legal counsel after the initial close, travel expenses and filing fees. Extraordinary Services Extraordinary Services are duties or responsibilities of an unusual nature, including termination, but not provided for in the governing documents or otherwise set forth in this schedule. A reasonable charge will be assessed based on the nature of the services and the responsibility involved. At our option, these charges will be billed at a flat fee or at our hourly rate then in effect. Account approval is subject to review and qualification. Fees are subject to change at our discretion and upon written notice. Fees paid in advance will not be prorated. The fees set forth above and any subsequent modifications thereof are part of your agreement. Finalization of the transaction constitutes agreement to the above fee schedule, including agreement to any subsequent changes upon proper written notice. In the event your transaction is not finalized, any related out—of-pocket expenses will be billed to you directly. Absent your written instructions to sweep or otherwise invest, all sums in your account will remain uninvested and no accrued interest or other compensation will be credited to the account. Payment of fees constitutes acceptance of the terms and conditions set forth. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT PROCEDURES FOR OPENING A NEW ACCOUNT: To help the government fight the funding of terrorism and money laundering activities, Federal law requires all financial institutions to obtain, verify and record information that identifies each person who opens an account. For a non -individual person such as a business entity, a charity, a Trust or other legal entity we will ask for documentation to verify its formation and existence as a legal entity. We may also ask to see financial statements, licenses, identification and authorization documents from individuals claiming authority to represent the entity or the entity or other relevant documentation. 01884874-1\10714-138 May 18, 2021 The City Council of the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, met via electronic means, an in- person meeting having been determined to be impossible or impractical due to the COVID-19 pandemic, at 6:00 P.M., on the above date. There were present Mayor Teague, in the chair, and the following named Council Members: Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner Absent: None Vacant: None Council Member Thomas introduced the following resolution entitled "RESOLUTION APPOINTING U.S. BANK OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, TO SERVE AS PAYING AGENT, BOND REGISTRAR, AND TRANSFER AGENT, APPROVING THE PAYING AGENT AND BOND REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT", and moved that the resolution be adopted. Council Member Taylor seconded the motion to adopt. The roll was called and the vote was, AYES: Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner NAYS:None Whereupon, the Mayor declared said Resolution duly adopted as follows: Resolution No. 21-130 RESOLUTION APPOINTING U.S. BANK OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA, TO SERVE AS PAYING AGENT, BOND REGISTRAR, AND TRANSFER AGENT, APPROVING THE PAYING AGENT AND BOND REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021, dated June 1, 2021, have been sold and action should now be taken to provide for the maintenance of records, registration of certificates and payment of principal and interest in connection with the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, this Council has deemed that the services offered by U.S. Bank of Saint Paul, Minnesota, are necessary for compliance with rules, regulations, and requirements governing the registration, transfer and payment of registered bonds; and WHEREAS, a Paying Agent, Bond Registrar and Transfer Agent Agreement (hereafter "Agreement") has been prepared to be entered into between the City and U.S. Bank. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, STATE OF IOWA: 1. That U.S. Bank of Saint Paul, Minnesota, is hereby appointed to serve as Paying Agent, Bond Registrar and Transfer Agent in connection with the issuance of $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021, dated June 1, 2021. 1 That the Agreement with U.S. Bank of Saint Paul, Minnesota, is hereby approved and that the Mayor and Clerk are authorized to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. PASSED AND APPROVED this 18a day of May, 2021. ATTEST: City Clerk El M&y6r Item Number: 7.g. I �, CITY OF IOWA CITY -�"'�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution authorizing and providing for the issuance, and levying a tax to pay the Bonds; Approval of the Tax Exemption Certificate and Continuing Disclosure Certificate. Prepared By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Reviewed By: Ashley Monroe, Assistant to the City Manager Fiscal Impact: Adopted as part of the FY2021 Revised Budget and 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Program Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Authorizing Issuance Tax Exemption Certificate Continuing Disclosure Certificate for the Series 2021 GO Bonds Executive Summary: On the May 18 City Council agenda, there are two separate resolutions for the City Council to consider in order to complete the sale of the 2021 General Obligation Bonds. The first resolution appoints US Bank as the registrar and paying agent for the 2021 General Obligation Bonds and authorizes the execution of an agreement with them for these services. The second resolution approves the tax exemption certificate, the continuing disclosure certificate and authorizes the issuance of the 2021 General Obligation Bonds. The resolution also amends the tax levy requirements needed for the repayment of the bonds. Background /Analysis: On May 4, 2021, the City sold the 2021 General Obligation Bonds at a par amount of $11,325,000. The City received four bids on the 2021 General Obligation Bonds from KeyBanc Capital Markets, Robert W. Baird & Company, Hilltop Securities, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith. The lowest true interest rate bid was received from KeyBanc Capital Markets of Denver, Colorado at 1.0645% and a price of $12,744,378.15. The 2021 General Obligation Bonds are 10 -year bonds that mature in 2031. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Authorizing Issuance Tax Exemption Certificate Continuing Disclosure Certificate May 18, 2021 The City Council of the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, met via electronic means, an in- person meeting having been determined to be impossible or impractical due to the COVID-14 pandemic, at 6:00 P.M., on the above date. There were present Mayor Teague, in the chair, and the following named Council Members: Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner Absent: None Vacant: None Council Member Thomas introduced the following Resolution entitled "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $11,325,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2021, AND LEVYING A TAX TO PAY SAID BONDS; APPROVAL OF THE TAX EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE AND CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE" and moved that it be adopted. Council Member Taylor seconded the motion to adopt, and the roll being called thereon, the vote was as follows: AYES: Bergus, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner NAYS:None Whereupon, the Mayor declared said Resolution duly adopted as follows: Resolution No. 21-131 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF $11,325,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2021, AND LEVYING A TAX TO PAY SAID BONDS; APPROVAL OF THE TAX EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE AND CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE WHEREAS, the Issuer is duly incorporated, organized and exists under and by virtue of the laws and Constitution of the State of Iowa; and WHEREAS, the Issuer is in need of funds to pay costs of the opening, widening, extending, grading and drainage of the right-of-way of streets, highways, avenues, alleys, and public grounds; the construction, reconstruction, and repairing of any street and streetscape improvements, with related utility work, traffic control devices, lighting, sidewalks, and the acquisition of real estate for such purposes; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of bridges; the rehabilitation and improvement of parks already owned, including facilities, equipment and improvements commonly found in city parks; equipping the fire department; and the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, and equipping of works and facilities useful for the collection and disposal of solid waste, essential corporate purpose(s), and it is deemed necessary and advisable that General Obligation Bonds, to the amount of not to exceed $10,200,000 be authorized for said purpose(s); and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice published as required by Section 384.25 of the Code of Iowa, this Council has held a public meeting and hearing upon the proposal to institute proceedings for the issuance of the General Obligation Bonds, and the Council is therefore now authorized to proceed with the issuance of said Bonds for such purpose(s); and WHEREAS, the City is in need of funds to pay costs of improvements to and equipping of the Senior Center facility, general corporate purpose(s), and it is deemed necessary and 5 advisable that General Obligation Bonds, to the amount of Not to Exceed $700,000 be authorized for said purpose(s); and WHEREAS, the Issuer has a population of more than 5,000 but not more than 75,000, and the Bonds for these purposes do not exceed $700,000; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice published as required by Section 384.26 of the Code of Iowa, the Council of the City has held public meeting and hearing upon the proposal to institute proceedings for the issuance of Bonds for general corporate purpose(s) in the amounts as above set forth, and, no petition for referendum having been received, the Council is therefore now authorized to proceed with the issuance of said Bonds for such purpose(s); and WHEREAS, the City is in need of funds to pay costs of the acquisition, construction and reconstruction of facilities for the public works department, including sand and salt storage bunkers; and the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of trails and recreational areas, general corporate purpose(s), and it is deemed necessary and advisable that General Obligation Bonds, to the amount of Not to Exceed $700,000 be authorized for said purpose(s); and WHEREAS, the Issuer has a population of more than 5,000 but not more than 75,000, and the Bonds for these purposes do not exceed $700,000; and WHEREAS, pursuant to notice published as required by Section 384.26 of the Code of Iowa, the Council of the City has held public meeting and hearing upon the proposal to institute proceedings for the issuance of Bonds for general corporate purpose(s) in the amounts as above set forth, and, no petition for referendum having been received, the Council is therefore now authorized to proceed with the issuance of said Bonds for such purpose(s); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 384.28 of the Code of Iowa, it is hereby found and determined that the various general obligation Bonds authorized as hereinabove described shall be combined for the purpose of issuance in a single issue of $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 75 of the Code of Iowa, the above mentioned Bonds were heretofore sold at public sale and action should now be taken to issue said Bonds conforming to the terms and conditions of the best bid received at the advertised public sale. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, STATE OF IOWA: Section 1. Definitions. The following terms shall have the following meanings in this Resolution unless the text expressly or by necessary implication requires otherwise: • "Authorized Denominations" shall mean $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. • "Beneficial Owner" shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name such Bond is recorded as the beneficial owner of such Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant or such person's subrogee. • "Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations" shall mean the Representation Letter from the Issuer to DTC, with respect to the Bonds. "Bond Fund" shall mean the fund created in Section 3 of this Resolution. • 'Bonds" shall mean $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021, authorized to be issued by this Resolution. • "Cede & Co." shall mean Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds. • "Continuing Disclosure Certificate" shall mean that certain Continuing Disclosure Certificate approved under the terms of this Resolution and to be executed by the Issuer and dated the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof, • "Depository Bonds " shall mean the Bonds as issued in the form of one global certificate for each maturity, registered in the Registration Books maintained by the Registrar in the name of DTC or its nominee. • "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, which will act as security depository for the Bond pursuant to the Representation Letter. "Issuer" and "City" shall mean the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa. • "Participants" shall mean those broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions for which DTC holds Bonds as securities depository. • "Paying Agent" shall mean U.S Bank, or such successor as may be approved by Issuer as provided herein and who shall carry out the duties prescribed herein as Issuer's agent to provide for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due. • "Project" shall mean the costs of the opening, widening, extending, grading and drainage of the right-of-way of streets, highways, avenues, alleys, and public grounds; the construction, reconstruction, and repairing of any street and streetscape improvements, with related utility work, traffic control devices, lighting, sidewalks, and the acquisition of real estate for such purposes; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of bridges; the rehabilitation and improvement of parks already owned, including facilities, equipment and improvements commonly found in city parks; equipping the fire department; the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, 7 extension, improvement, and equipping of works and facilities useful for the collection and disposal of solid waste; the acquisition, construction and reconstruction of facilities for the public works department, including sand and salt storage bunkers; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of trails and recreational areas; and improvements to and equipping of the Senior Center facility. • "Project Fund" shall mean the fund required to be established by this Resolution for the deposit of the proceeds of the Bonds. • "Rebate Fund" shall mean the fund so defined in and established pursuant to the Tax Exemption Certificate. • "Registrar" shall mean U.S. Bank of Saint Paul, Minnesota, or such successor as may be approved by Issuer as provided herein and who shall carry out the duties prescribed herein with respect to maintaining a register of the owners of the Bonds. Unless otherwise specified, the Registrar shall also act as Transfer Agent for the Bonds. "Resolution" shall mean this resolution authorizing the Bonds. • "Tax Exemption Certificate" shall mean the Tax Exemption Certificate approved under the terns of this Resolution and to be executed by the Treasurer and delivered at the time of issuance and delivery of the Bonds. • "Treasurer" shall mean the Finance Director or such other officer as shall succeed to the same duties and responsibilities with respect to the recording and payment of the Bonds issued hereunder. Section 2. Levy and Certification of Annual Tax; Other Funds to be Used. a) Levy of Annual Tax. That for the purpose of providing funds to pay the principal and interest of the Bonds hereinafter authorized to be issued, there is hereby levied for each future year the following direct annual tax on all of the taxable property in the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, to -wit, which amends the levies imposed in the "Resolution authorizing the issuance and levying a tax for the payment thereof' imposing a pre -levy dated March 16, 2021: FISCAL YEAR (JULY 1 TO JUNE 30) AMOUNT YEAR OF COLLECTION $1,588,500 2021/2022* $1,531,750 2022/2023 $1,475,000 2023/2024 $1,418,250 2024/2025 $1,361,500 2025/2026 $1,304,750 2026/2027 $1,248,000 2027/2028 $1,213,950 2028/2029 $1,179,900 2029/2030 $1,132,200 2030/2031 *A levy in the amount of $1,389,971 has been included in the budget previously certified and will be used together with available City funds to pay the principal and interest of the Bond coming due in fiscal year 2021/2022. (NOTE: For example the levy to be made and certified against the taxable valuations of January 1, 2020 will be collected during the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2021.) b) Resolution to be Filed With County Auditor. A certified copy of this Resolution shall be filed with the Auditor of Johnson County, Iowa and the Auditor is hereby instructed in and for each of the years as provided, to levy and assess the tax hereby authorized in Section 2 of this Resolution, in like manner as other taxes are levied and assessed, and such taxes so levied in and for each of the years aforesaid be collected in like manner as other taxes of the City are collected, and when collected be used for the purpose of paying principal and interest on said Bonds issued in anticipation of the tax, and for no other purpose whatsoever. c) Additional City Funds Available. Principal and interest coming due at any time when the proceeds of said tax on hand shall be insufficient to pay the same shall be promptly paid when due from current funds of the City available for that purpose and reimbursement shall be made from such special fund in the amounts thus advanced. Section 3. Bond Fund. Said tax shall be assessed and collected each year at the same time and in the same manner as, and in addition to, all other taxes in and for the City, and when collected they shall be converted into a special fund within the Debt Service Fund to be known as the "2021 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND FUND NO. 1" (the "Bond Fund"), which is hereby pledged for and shall be used only for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds hereinafter authorized to be issued; and also there shall be apportioned to said fund its proportion of taxes received by the City from property that is centrally assessed by the State of Iowa. 0 Section 4. Application of Bond Proceeds. Proceeds of the Bonds, other than accrued interest except as may be provided below, shall be credited to the Project Fund and expended therefrom for the purposes of issuance. Any amounts on hand in the Project Fund shall be available for the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds at any time that other funds shall be insufficient to the purpose, in which event such funds shall be repaid to the Project Fund at the earliest opportunity. Any balance on hand in the Project Fund and not immediately required for its purposes maybe invested not inconsistent with limitations provided by law or this Resolution. Section 5. Investment of Bond Fund Proceeds. All moneys held in the Bond Fund, provided for by Section 3 of this Resolution shall be invested in investments permitted by Chapter 12B, Code of Iowa, 2019, as amended, or deposited in financial institutions which are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the deposits in which are insured thereby and all such deposits exceeding the maximum amount insured from time to time by FDIC or its equivalent successor in any one financial institution shall be continuously secured in compliance with Chapter 12C of the Code of Iowa, 2019, as amended, or otherwise by a valid pledge of direct obligations of the United States Government having an equivalent market value. All such interim investments shall mature before the date on which the moneys are required for payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds as herein provided. Section 6. Bond Details, Execution and Redemption. a) Bond Details. General Obligation Bonds of the City in the amount of $11,325,000, shall be issued pursuant to the provisions of Sections 384.25, 384.26 and 384.28 of the Code of Iowa for the aforesaid purposes. The Bonds shall be designated "GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2021 ", be dated June 1, 2021, and bear interest from the date thereof, until payment thereof, at the office of the Paying Agent, said interest payable on December 1, 2021, and semiannually thereafter on the 1st day of June and December in each year until maturity at the rates hereinafter provided. The Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Clerk, and impressed or printed with the seal of the City and shall be fully registered as to both principal and interest as provided in this Resolution; principal, interest and premium, if any, shall be payable at the office of the Paying Agent by mailing of a check to the registered owner of the Bond. The Bonds shall be in the denomination of $5,000 or multiples thereof. The Bonds shall mature and bear interest as follows: 10 Principal Interest Maturity Amount Rate June 1 st $1,135,000 5.000% 2022 $1,135,000 5.000% 2023 $1,135,000 5.000% 2024 $1,135,000 5.000% 2025 $1,135,000 5.000% 2026 $1,135,000 5.000% 2027 $1,135,000 3.000% 2028 $1,135,000 3.000% 2029 $1,135,000 2.000% 2030 $1,110,000 2.000% 2031 b) Redemption. i. Optional Redemption. Bonds maturing after June 1, 2027, may be called for optional redemption by the Issuer on that date or any date thereafter, from any funds regardless of source, in whole or from time to time in part, in any order of maturity and within an annual maturity by lot. The terms of redemption shall be par, plus accrued interest to date of call. Thirty days' written notice of redemption shall be given to the registered owner of the Bond. Failure to give written notice to any registered owner of the Bonds or any defect therein shall not affect the validity of any proceedings for the redemption of the Bonds. All Bonds or portions thereof called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided funds for their redemption are on deposit at the place of payment. Written notice will be deemed completed upon transmission to the owner of record. If selection by lot within a maturity is required, the Registrar shall designate the Bonds to be redeemed by random selection of the names of the registered owners of the entire annual maturity until the total amount of Bonds to be called has been reached. If less than all of a maturity is called for redemption, the Issuer will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be redeemed prior to maturity. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each Participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each Participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Section 7. Issuance of Bonds in Book -Entry Form; Replacement Bonds 11 a) Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Resolution regarding registration, ownership, transfer, payment and exchange of the Bonds, unless the Issuer determines to permit the exchange of Depository Bonds for Bonds in Authorized Denominations, the Bonds shall be issued as Depository Bonds in denominations of the entire principal amount of each maturity of Bonds (or, if a portion of said principal amount is prepaid, said principal amount less the prepaid amount). The Bonds must be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. Payment of semiannual interest for any Bonds registered in the name of Cede & Co. will be made by wire transfer or New 'York Clearing House or equivalent next day funds to the account of Cede & Co. on the interest payment date for the Bonds at the address indicated or in the Representation Letter. b) The Bonds will be initially issued in the form of separate single authenticated fully registered bonds in the amount of each stated maturity of the Bonds. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of the Bonds will be registered in the registry books of the U.S. Bank kept by the Paying Agent and Registrar in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. The Paying Agent and Registrar and the Issuer may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and exclusive owner of the Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of the principal or redemption price of or interest on the Bonds, selecting the Bonds or portions to be redeemed, giving any notice permitted or required to be given to registered owners of Bonds under the Resolution of the Issuer, registering the transfer of Bonds, obtaining any consent or other action to be taken by registered owners of the Bonds and for other purposes. The Paying Agent, Registrar and the Issuer have no responsibility or obligation to any Participant or Beneficial Owner of the Bonds under or through DTC with respect to the accuracy of records maintained by DTC or any Participant; with respect to the payment by DTC or Participant of an amount of principal or redemption price of or interest on the Bonds; with respect to any notice given to owners of Bonds under the Resolution; with respect to the Participant(s) selected to receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds, or a consent given or other action taken by DTC as registered owner of the Bonds. The Paying Agent and Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to Cede & Co. in accordance with the Representation Letter, and all payments are valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the Issuer's obligations with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum paid. DTC must receive an authenticated Bond for each separate stated maturity evidencing the obligation of the Issuer to make payments of principal of and premium, if any, and interest. Upon delivery by DTC to the Paying Agent and Registrar of written notice that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the Bonds will be transferable to the new nominee in accordance with this Section. c) In the event the Issuer determines that it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bonds certificates, the Issuer may notify DTC and the Paying Agent and Registrar, whereupon DTC will notify the Participants, of the availability through DTC of Bonds certificates. The Bonds will be transferable in accordance with this Section. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the Issuer and the Paying Agent and Registrar and discharging its responsibilities under applicable law. In this event, the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with this Section. 12 d) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bond and all notices must be made and given, respectively to DTC as provided in the Representation letter. e) In connection with any notice or other communication to be provided to Bondholders by the Issuer or the Paying Agent and Registrar with respect to a consent or other action to be taken by Bondholders, the Issuer or the Paying Agent and Registrar, as the case may be, shall establish a record date for the consent or other action and give DTC notice of the record date not less than 15 calendar days in advance of the record date to the extent possible. Notice to DTC must be given only when DTC is the sole Bondholder. f) The Representation Letter is on file with DTC and sets forth certain matters with respect to, among other things, notices, consents and approvals by Bondholders and payments on the Bonds. The execution and delivery of the Representation Letter to DTC by the Issuer is ratified and confirmed. g) In the event that a transfer or exchange of the Bonds is permitted under this Section, the transfer or exchange may be accomplished upon receipt by the Registrar from the registered owners of the Bonds to be transferred or exchanged and appropriate instruments of transfer. In the event Bond certificates are issued to holders other than Cede & Co., its successor as nominee for DTC as holder of all the Bonds, or other securities depository as holder of all the Bonds, the provisions of the Resolution apply to, among other things, the printing of certificates and the method or payment of principal of and interest on the certificates. Any substitute depository shall be designated in writing by the Issuer to the Paying Agent. Any such substitute depository shall be a qualified and registered "clearing agency" as provided in Section 17A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The substitute depository shall provide for (i) immobilization of the Depository Bonds, (ii) registration and transfer of interests in Depository Bonds by book entries made on records of the depository or its nominee and (iii) payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds in accordance with and as such interests may appear with respect to such book entries. h) The officers of the Issuer are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the purchaser, and to the attorneys approving the legality of Bonds, certified copies of proceedings, ordinances, resolutions and records and all certificates and affidavits and other instruments as may be required to evidence the legality and marketability of the Bonds, and all certified copies, certificates, affidavits and other instruments constitute representations of the Issuer as to the correctness of all stated or recited facts. Section 8. Registration of Bonds_A oointment of Registrar: Transfer Ownership; Delivery; and Cancellation. a) Registration. The ownership of Bonds may be transferred only by the making of an entry upon the books kept for the registration and transfer of ownership of the 13 Bonds, and in no other way. U.S. Bank is hereby appointed as Bond Registrar under the terms of this Resolution and under the provisions of a separate agreement with the Issuer filed herewith which is made a part hereof by this reference. Registrar shall maintain the books of the Issuer for the registration of ownership of the Bonds for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds as provided in this Resolution. All Bonds shall be negotiable as provided in Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code and Section 384.31 of the Code of Iowa, subject to the provisions for registration and transfer contained in the Bonds and in this Resolution. b) Transfer. The ownership of any Bond may be transferred only upon the Registration Books kept for the registration and transfer of Bonds and only upon surrender thereof at the office of the Registrar together with an assignment duly executed by the holder or his duly authorized attorney in fact in such form as shall be satisfactory to the Registrar, along with the address and social security number or federal employer identification number of such transferee (or, if registration is to be made in the name of multiple individuals, of all such transferees). In the event that the address of the registered owner of a Bond (other than a registered owner which is the nominee of the broker or dealer in question) is that of a broker or dealer, there must be disclosed on the Registration Books the information pertaining to the registered owner required above. Upon the transfer of any such Bond, a new fully registered Bond, of any denomination or denominations permitted by this Resolution in aggregate principal amount equal to the unmatured and unredeemed principal amount of such transferred fully registered Bond, and bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date or dates shall be delivered by the Registrar. c) Registration of Transferred Bonds. In all cases of the transfer of the Bonds, the Registrar shall register, at the earliest practicable time, on the Registration Books, the Bonds, in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution. d) Ownership. As to any Bond, the person in whose name the ownership of the same shall be registered on the Registration Books of the Registrar shall be deemed and regarded as the absolute owner thereof for all purposes, and payment of or on account of the principal of any such Bonds and the premium, if any, and interest thereon shall be made only to or upon the order of the registered owner thereof or his legal representative. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond, including the interest thereon, to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. e) Cancellation. All Bonds which have been redeemed shall not be reissued but shall be cancelled by the Registrar. All Bonds which are cancelled by the Registrar shall be destroyed and a certificate of the destruction thereof shall be furnished promptly to the Issuer; provided that if the Issuer shall so direct, the Registrar shall forward the cancelled Bonds to the Issuer. f) Non -Presentment of Bonds. hi the event any payment check, wire, or electronic transfer of funds representing payment of principal of or interest on the Bonds is returned to the Paying Agent or if any bond is not presented for payment of principal at the maturity or redemption date, if funds sufficient to pay such principal of or interest on 14 Bonds shall have been made available to the Paying Agent for the benefit of the owner thereof, all liability of the Issuer to the owner thereof for such interest or payment of such Bonds shall forthwith cease, terminate and be completely discharged, and thereupon it shall be the duty of the Paying Agent to hold such funds, without liability for interest thereon, for the benefit of the owner of such Bonds who shall thereafter be restricted exclusively to such funds for any claim of whatever nature on his part under this Resolution or on, or with respect to, such interest or Bonds. The Paying Agent's obligation to hold such funds shall continue for a period equal to two years and six months following the date on which such interest or principal became due, whether at maturity, or at the date fixed for redemption thereof, or otherwise, at which time the Paying Agent shall surrender any remaining funds so held to the Issuer, whereupon any claim under this Resolution by the Owners of such interest or Bonds of whatever nature shall be made upon the Issuer. g) Registration and Transfer Fees. The Registrar may famish to each owner, at the Issuer's expense, one bond for each annual maturity. The Registrar shall furnish additional Bonds in lesser denominations (but not less than the minimum denomination) to an owner who so requests. Section 9. Reissuance of Mutilated, Destroyed Stolen or Lost Bonds. In case any outstanding Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Issuer shall at the request of Registrar authenticate and deliver a new Bond of like tenor and amount as the Bond so mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost, in exchange and substitution for such mutilated Bond to Registrar, upon surrender of such mutilated Bond, or in lieu of and substitution for the Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar evidence satisfactory to the Registrar and Issuer that such Bond has been destroyed, stolen or lost and proof of ownership thereof, and upon furnishing the Registrar and Issuer with satisfactory indemnity and complying with such other reasonable regulations as the Issuer or its agent may prescribe and paying such expenses as the Issuer may incur in connection therewith. Section 10. Record Date. Payments of principal and interest, otherwise than upon full redemption, made in respect of any Bond, shall be made to the registered holder thereof or to their designated agent as the same appear on the books of the Registrar on the 15th day of the month preceding the payment date. All such payments shall fully discharge the obligations of the Issuer in respect of such Bonds to the extent of the payments so made. Upon receipt of the final payment of principal, the holder of the Bond shall surrender the Bond to the Paying Agent. Section 11. Execution, Authentication and Delivery of the Bonds Upon the adoption of this Resolution, the Mayor and Clerk shall execute the Bonds by their manual or authorized signature and deliver the Bonds to the Registrar, who shall authenticate the Bonds and deliver the same to or upon order of the Purchaser. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or shall be entitled to any right or benefit hereunder unless the Registrar shall duly endorse and execute on such Bond a Certificate of Authentication substantially in the form of the Certificate herein set forth. Such Certificate upon any Bond executed on behalf of the Issuer shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly issued under this Resolution and that the holder thereof is entitled to the benefits of this Resolution. 15 No Bonds shall be authenticated and delivered by the Registrar unless and until there shall have been provided the following: A certified copy of the Resolution of Issuer authorizing the issuance of the Bonds; 2. A written order of Issuer signed by the Treasurer of the Issuer directing the authentication and delivery of the Bonds to or upon the order of the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price as set forth therein; The approving opinion of Ahlers & Cooney, P.C., Bond Counsel, concerning the validity and legality of all the Bonds proposed to be issued. Section 12. Right to Name Substitute Paying Agent or Registrar. Issuer reserves the right to name a substitute, successor Registrar or Paying Agent upon giving prompt written notice to each registered bondholder. Section 13. Form of Bond. Bonds shall be printed substantially in the form as follows: "STATE OF IOWA" "COUNTY OF JOHNSON" "CITY OF IOWA CITY" "GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND" "SERIES 2021" CORPORATEPURPOSE Rate: Maturity: Bond Date: June 1, 2021 CUSIP No.: "Registered" Certificate No. Principal Amount: $_ The City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and laws of the State of Iowa (the "Issuer"), for value received, promises to pay from the source and as hereinafter provided, on the maturity date indicated above, to (Registration panel to be completed by Registrar or Printer with name of Registered Owner). or registered assigns, the principal sum of (enter principal amount in long form) THOUSAND DOLLARS in lawful money of the United States of America, on the maturity date shown above, only upon presentation and surrender hereof at the office of U.S Bank, Paying Agent of this issue, or its successor, with interest on the sum from the date hereof until paid at the rate per 16 annum specified above, payable on December I, 2021, and semiannually thereafter on the 1 st day of June and December in each year. Interest and principal shall be paid to the registered holder of the Bond as shown on the records of ownership maintained by the Registrar as of the 15th day of the month preceding such interest payment date. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 - day months. This Bond is issued pursuant to the provisions of Sections 384.25, 384.26 and 384.28 of the Code of Iowa, for the purpose of paying costs of the opening, widening, extending, grading and drainage of the right-of-way of streets, highways, avenues, alleys, and public grounds; the construction, reconstruction, and repairing of any street and streetscape improvements, with related utility work, traffic control devices, lighting, sidewalks, and the acquisition of real estate for such purposes; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of bridges; the rehabilitation and improvement of parks already owned, including facilities, equipment and improvements commonly found in city parks; equipping the fire department; the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, and equipping of works and facilities useful for the collection and disposal of solid waste; the acquisition, construction and reconstruction of facilities for the public works department, including sand and salt storage bunkers; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of trails and recreational areas; and improvements to and equipping of the Senior Center facility, in conformity to a Resolution of the Council of said City duly passed and approved. Unless this certificate is presented by an authorized representative of The Depository Trust Company, a limited purpose trust company ("DTC"), to the Issuer or its agent for registration of transfer, exchange or payment, and any certificate issued is registered in the name of Cede & Co. or such other name as requested by an authorized representative of DTC (and any payment is made to Cede & Co. or to such other Issuer as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC), ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL inasmuch as the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein. Bonds maturing after June 1, 2027, may be called for optional redemption by the Issuer and paid before maturity on said date or any date thereafter, from any funds regardless of source, in whole or from time to time in part, in any order of maturity and within an annual maturity by lot. The terms of redemption shall be par, plus accrued interest to date of call. Thirty days' written notice of redemption shall be given to the registered owner of the Bond. Failure to give written notice to any registered owner of the Bonds or any defect therein shall not affect the validity of any proceedings for the redemption of the Bonds. All bonds or portions thereof called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided funds for their redemption are on deposit at the place of payment. Written notice will be deemed completed upon transmission to the owner of record. 17 If selection by lot within a maturity is required, the Registrar shall designate the Bonds to be redeemed by random selection of the names of the registered owners of the entire annual maturity until the total amount of Bonds to be called has been reached. If less than all of a maturity is called for redemption, the Issuer will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be redeemed prior to maturity. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each Participant's interest in such maturity to be redeemed and each Participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest. Ownership of this Bond may be transferred only by transfer upon the books kept for such purpose by U.S. Bank, the Registrar. Such transfer on the books shall occur only upon presentation and surrender of this Bond at the office of the Registrar as designated below, together with an assignment duly executed by the owner hereof or his duly authorized attorney in the form as shall be satisfactory to the Registrar. Issuer reserves the right to substitute the Registrar and Paying Agent but shall, however, promptly give notice to registered Bondholders of such change. All bonds shall be negotiable as provided in Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code and Section 384.31 of the Code of Iowa, subject to the provisions for registration and transfer contained in the Bond Resolution. And it is hereby represented and certified that all acts, conditions and things requisite, according to the laws and Constitution of the State of Iowa, to exist, to be had, to be done, or to be performed precedent to the lawful issue of this Bond, have been existent, had, done and performed as required by law; that provision has been made for the levy of a sufficient continuing annual tax on all the taxable property within the territory of the Issuer for the payment of the principal and interest of this Bond as the same will respectively become due; that such taxes have been irrevocably pledged for the prompt payment hereof, both principal and interest; and the total indebtedness of the Issuer including this Bond, does not exceed the constitutional or statutory limitations. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Issuer by its Council, has caused this Bond to be signed by the manual or facsimile signature of its Mayor and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of its City Clerk, with the seal of the City printed or impressed hereon, and to be authenticated by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar, U.S. Bank, Saint Paul, Minnesota. Date of authentication: This is one of the Bonds described in the within mentioned Resolution, as registered by U.S. Bank. U.S. BANK, Registrar Authorized Signature Registrar and Transfer Agent: U.S. Bank It Paying Agent: U.S Bank SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS (Seal) (Signature Block) CITY OF IOWA CITY, STATE OF IOWA By: (manual or facsimile signature) Mayor ATTEST: By: (manual or facsimile signature) City Clerk (Information Required for Registration) ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto (Social Security or Tax Identification No. the within Bond and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint attorney in fact to transfer the said Bond on the books kept for registration of the within Bond, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: (Person(s) executing this Assignment sign(s) here) SIGNATURE) GUARANTEE] IMPORTANT - READ CAREFULLY The signature(s) to this Power must correspond with the name(s) as written upon the face of the certificate(s) or bond(s) in every particular without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. Signature guarantee must be provided in accordance with the prevailing standards and procedures of the Registrar and Transfer Agent. Such standards and procedures may require signature to be guaranteed by certain eligible guarantor institutions that participate in a recognized signature guarantee program. 19 INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR REGISTRATION OF TRANSFER Name of Transferee(s) Address ofTransferee(s) Social Security or Tax Identification Number of Transferee(s) Transferee is a(n): Individual* Partnership Corporation Trust *If the Bond is to be registered in the names of multiple individual owners, the names of all such owners and one address and social security number must be provided. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with rights of survivorship and not as tenants in common IA UNIF TRANS MIN ACT - .......... Custodian .......... (Cost) (Minor) Under Iowa Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ................... (State) ADDITIONAL ABBREVIATIONS MAY ALSO BE USED THOUGH NOT IN THE ABOVE LIST (End of form of Bond) Section 14. Closing Documents. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute, attest, seal and deliver for and on behalf of the City any other additional certificates, documents, or other papers and perform all other acts, including without limitation the execution of all closing documents, as they may deem necessary or appropriate in order to implement and carry out the intent and purposes of this Resolution. Section 15. Contract Between Issuer and Purchaser. This Resolution constitutes a contract between said City and the purchaser of the Bonds. Section 16. Non -Arbitrage Covenants. The Issuer reasonably expects and covenants that no use will be made of the proceeds from the issuance and sale of the Bonds issued hereunder which will cause any of the Bonds to be classified as arbitrage bonds within the meaning of Sections 148(a) and (b) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States, as amended, and that throughout the term of the Bonds it will comply with the requirements of statutes and regulations issued thereunder. PXQ To the best knowledge and belief of the Issuer, there are no facts or circumstances that would materially change the foregoing statements or the conclusion that it is not expected that the proceeds of the Bonds will be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds. Section 17. Approval of Tax Exemption Certificate. Attached hereto is a form of Tax Exemption Certificate stating the Issuer`s reasonable expectations as to the use of the proceeds of the Bonds. The form of Tax Exemption Certificate is approved. The Issuer hereby agrees to comply with the provisions of the Tax Exemption Certificate and the provisions of the Tax Exemption Certificate are hereby incorporated by reference as part of this Resolution. The Finance Director is hereby directed to make and insert all calculations and determinations necessary to complete the Tax Exemption Certificate at issuance of the Bonds to certify as to the reasonable expectations and covenants of the Issuer at that date. Section 18. Continuing Disclosure. The Issuer hereby covenants and agrees that it will comply with and carry out all of the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate, and the provisions of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate are hereby incorporated by reference as part of this Resolution and made a part hereof. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Resolution, failure of the Issuer to comply with the Continuing Disclosure Certificate shall not be considered an event of default under this Resolution; however, any holder of the Bonds or Beneficial Owner may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking specific performance by court order, to cause the Issuer to comply with its obligations under the Continuing Disclosure Certificate. For purposes of this section, 'Beneficial Owner" means any person which (a) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, any Bond (including persons holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of any Bonds for federal income tax purposes. Section 19. Additional Covenants Representations and Warranties of the Issuer. The Issuer certifies and covenants with the purchasers and holders of the Bonds from time to time outstanding that the Issuer through its officers, (a) will make such further specific covenants, representations and assurances as may be necessary or advisable; (b) comply with all representations, covenants and assurances contained in the Tax Exemption Certificate, which Tax Exemption Certificate shall constitute a part of the contract between the Issuer and the owners of the Bonds;(c) consult with Bond Counsel (as defined in the Tax Exemption Certificate); (d) pay to the United States, as necessary, such sums of money representing required rebates of excess arbitrage profits relating to the Bonds;(e) file such forms, statements and supporting documents as may be required and in a timely manner; and (f) if deemed necessary or advisable by its officers, to employ and pay fiscal agents, financial advisors, attorneys and other persons to assist the Issuer in such compliance. Section 20. Amendment of Resolution to Maintain Tax Exemption. This Resolution may be amended without the consent of any owner of the Bonds if, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, such amendment is necessary to maintain tax exemption with respect to the Bonds under applicable Federal law or regulations. 21 Section 21. Repeal of Conflicting Resolutions or Ordinances. All ordinances and resolutions and parts of ordinances and resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 22. Severability Clause. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this Resolution be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any of the remaining provisions hereof, and this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED AND APPROVED this 181 day of May, 2021. ATTEST: IL City derk 22 or CERTIFICATE STATE OF IOWA ) ) SS COUNTY OF JOHNSON ) 1, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, do hereby certify that attached is a true and complete copy of the portion of the records of the City showing proceedings of the Council, and the same is a true and complete copy of the action taken by the Council with respect to the matter at the meeting held on the date indicated in the attachment, which proceedings remain in full force and effect, and have not been amended or rescinded in any way; that meeting and all action thereat was duly and publicly held in accordance with a notice of meeting and tentative agenda, a copy of which was timely served on each member of the Council and posted on a bulletin board or other prominent place easily accessible to the public and clearly designated for that purpose at the principal office of the Council pursuant to the local rules of the Council and the provisions of Chapter 21, Code of Iowa, upon reasonable advance notice to the public and media at least twenty-four hours prior to the commencement of the meeting as required by law and with members of the public present in attendance; I further certify that the individuals named therein were on the date thereof duly and lawfully possessed of their respective City offices as indicated therein, that no Council vacancy existed except as may be stated in the proceedings, and that no controversy or litigation is pending, prayed or threatened involving the incorporation, organization, existence or boundaries of the City or the right of the individuals named therein as officers to their respective positions. WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Council hereto affixed this +4-1 day of 01DUA 2021. City dlerk, City of1o, a City, State of a (SEAL) 01883145-1110714-138 TAX EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE of CITY OF IOWA CITY, COUNTY OF JOHNSON, STATE OF IOWA, ISSUER $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 This instrument was prepared by: Ahlers & Cooney, P.C. 100 Court Avenue, Suite 600 Des Moines, Iowa 50309 (515) 243-7611 TABLE OF CONTENTS This Table of Contents is not a part of this Tax Exemption Certificate and is provided only for convenience of reference. INTRODUCTION ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS ARTICLE II SPECIFIC CERTIFICATIONS. REPRESENTATIONS AND AGREEMENTS Section 2.1 Authority to Certify and Expectations Section 2.2 Receipts and Expenditures of Sale Proceeds Section 2.3 Purpose of Bonds Section 2.4 Facts Supporting Tax -Exemption Classification Section 2.5 Facts Supportin _ Tgemporary Periods for Proceeds Section 2.6 Resolution Funds at Restricted or Unrestricted Yield Section 2.7 Pertaining to Yields ARTICLE III REBATE Section 3.1 Records Section 3.2 Rebate Fund Section 3.3 Exceptions to Rebate Section 3.4 Calculation of Rebate Amount Section 3.5 Rebate Requirements and the Bond Fund Section 3.6 Investment of the Rebate Fund Section 3.7 Payment to the United States Section 3.8 Records Section 3.9 Additional Payments ARTICLE IV INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS Section 4.1 Avoidance of Prohibited Payments Section 4.2 Market Price Requirement Section 4.3 Investment in Certificates of Deposit Section 4.4 Investment Pursuant to Investment Contracts and Agreements Section 4.5 Records Section 4.6 Investments to be Legal ARTICLE V GENERAL COVENANTS ARTICLE VI AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS Section 6.1 Opinion of Bond Counsel; Amendments Section 6.2 Additional Covenants, Agreements Section 6.3 Internal Revenue Service Audits Section 6.4 Amendments EXHIBIT A PURCHASER'S CERTIFICATE.....................................................19 EXHIBIT B MUNICIPAL ADVISOR'S CERTIFICATE........................................23 W TAX EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE CITY OF IOWA CITY, STATE OF IOWA THIS TAX EXEMPTION CERTIFICATE made and entered into on June 1, 2021, by the City of Iowa City, County of Johnson, State of Iowa (the "Issuer"). INTRODUCTION This Certificate is executed and delivered in connection with the issuance by the Issuer of its $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 (the "Bonds"). The Bonds are issued pursuant to the provisions of the Resolution of the Issuer authorizing the issuance of the Bonds. Such Resolution provides that the covenants contained in this Certificate constitute a part of the Issuer's contract with the owners of the Bonds. The Issuer recognizes that under the Code (as defined below) the tax-exempt status of the interest received by the owners of the Bonds is dependent upon, among other things, the facts, circumstances, and reasonable expectations of the Issuer as to future facts not in existence at this time, as well as the observance of certain covenants in the future. The Issuer covenants that it will take such action with respect to the Bonds as may be required by the Code, and pertinent legal regulations issued thereunder in order to establish and maintain the tax-exempt status of the Bonds, including the observance of all specific covenants contained in the Resolution and this Certificate. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS The following terms as used in this Certificate shall have the meanings set forth below. The terms defined in the Resolution shall retain the meanings set forth therein when used in this Certificate. Other terms used in this Certificate shall have the meanings set forth in the Code or in the Regulations. • "Annual Debt Service" means the principal of and interest on the Bonds scheduled to be paid during a given Bond Year. • "Bonds" means the $11,325,000 aggregate principal amount of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021, of the Issuer issued in registered form pursuant to the Resolution. • "Bond Counsel" means Ahlers & Cooney, P.C., Des Moines, Iowa, or an attorney at law or a firm of attorneys of nationally recognized standing in matters pertaining to the tax-exempt status of interest on obligations issued by states and their political subdivisions, duly admitted to the practice of law before the highest court of any State of the United States of America. "Bond Fund" means the Sinking Fund described in the Resolution. • 'Bond Purchase Agreement" means the binding contract in writing for the sale of the Bonds. • 'Bond Year" as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(b), means a one-year period beginning on the day after expiration of the preceding Bond Year. The first Bond Year shall be the one-year or shorter period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on a principal or interest payment date, unless Issuer selects another date. • 'Bond Yield" means that discount rate which produces an amount equal to the Issue Price of the Bonds when used in computing the present value of all payments of principal and interest to be paid on the Bonds, using semiannual compounding on a 360 - day year as computed under Regulation 1.148-4. "Certificate" means this Tax Exemption Certificate. • "Closing" means the delivery of the Bonds in exchange for the agreed upon purchase price. "Closing Date" means the date of Closing. • "Code" means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any statutes which replace or supplement the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. • "Computation Date" means each five-year period from the Closing Date through the last day of the fifth and each succeeding fifth Bond Year. • 'Excess Earnings" means the amount earned on all Nonpurpose Investments minus the amount which would have been earned if such Nonpurpose Investments were invested at a rate equal to the Bond Yield, plus any income attributable to such excess. "Final Bond Retirement Date" means the date on which the Bonds are actually paid in full. • "Governmental Obligations" means direct general obligations of, or obligations the timely payment of the principal of and interest on which is unconditionally guaranteed by the United States. • "Gross Proceeds" as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(b), means any Proceeds of the Bonds and any replacement proceeds (as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(c)) of the Bonds. • "Gross Proceeds Funds" means the Project Fund, Proceeds held to pay cost of issuance, and any other fund or account held for the benefit of the owners of the Bonds or containing Gross Proceeds of the Bonds except the Bond Fund and the Rebate Fund. al • "Issue Price" as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(b) and (f)(2), means the price determined pursuant to the Special Rule for Competitive Sales in accordance with Regulation 1. 148-1 (f)(2)(iii). The Issuer hereby elects to utilize the Special Rule for Competitive Sales and treats the reasonably expected initial offering price to the public as of the sale date as the issue price of the Bonds. The Purchasers have certified the Issue Price to be not more than $12,788,545.65, as set forth in Exhibit A. • "Issuer" means the City of Iowa City, a municipal corporation in the County of Johnson, State of Iowa. • "Minor Portion of the Bonds", as defined in Regulation 1.148-2(g), means the lesser of five (5) percent of Proceeds or $100,000. The Minor Portion of the Bonds is computed to be $100,000. • "Nonpurpose Investments" means any investment property which is acquired with Gross Proceeds and is not acquired to carry out the governmental purpose of the Bonds, and may include but is not limited to U.S. Treasury bonds, corporate bonds, or certificates of deposit. • "Proceeds" as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(b), means Sale Proceeds, investment proceeds and transferred proceeds of the Bonds. • "Project" means the opening, widening, extending, grading and drainage of the right-of-way of streets, highways, avenues, alleys, and public grounds; the construction, reconstruction, and repairing of any street and streetscape improvements, with related utility work, traffic control devices, lighting, sidewalks, and the acquisition of real estate for such purposes; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of bridges; the rehabilitation and improvement of parks already owned, including facilities, equipment and improvements commonly found in city parks; equipping the fire department; the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, and equipping of works and facilities useful for the collection and disposal of solid waste; the acquisition, construction and reconstruction of facilities for the public works department, including sand and salt storage bunkers; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of trails and recreational areas; and improvements to and equipping of the Senior Center facility as more fully described in the Resolution. • "Project Fund" shall mean the fund required to be established by the Resolution for the deposit of the Proceeds of the Bonds. • "Purchasers" means KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. of Denver, Colorado, constituting the initial purchasers of the Bonds from the Issuer. Certificate. Certificate. "Rebate Amount" means the amount computed as described in this "Rebate Fund" means the fund to be created, if necessary, pursuant to this 5 • "Rebate Payment Date" means a date chosen by the Issuer which is not more than 60 days following each Computation Date or the Final Bond Retirement Date. • "Regulations" means the Income Tax Regulations, amendments and successor provisions promulgated by the Department of the Treasury under Sections 103, 148 and 149 of the Code, or other Sections of the Code relating to "arbitrage bonds", including without limitation Regulations 1.148-1 through 1.148-11, 1.149(b)-1, 1.149- d(1), 1.150-1 and 1.150-2. • "Replacement Proceeds" include, but are not limited to, sinking funds, amounts that are pledged as security for an issue, and amounts that are replaced because of a sufficiently direct nexus to a governmental purpose of an issue. • "Resolution" means the resolution of the Issuer adopted on May 18, 2021, authorizing the issuance of the Bonds. • "Sale Proceeds" as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(b), means any amounts actually or constructively received from the sale of the Bonds, including amounts used to pay underwriter's discount or compensation and accrued interest other than pre -issuance accrued interest. "Sinking Fund" means the Bond Fund. • "SLGS" means demand deposit Treasury securities of the State and Local Government Series. • "Tax Exempt Obligations" means bonds or other obligations the interest on which is excludable from the gross income of the owners thereof under Section 103 of the Code and include certain regulated investment companies, stock in tax-exempt mutual funds and demand deposit SLGS. • "Taxable Obligations" means all investment property, obligations or securities other than Tax Exempt Obligations. "Verification Certificate" means the certificate attached to this Certificate as Exhibit A, setting forth the offering prices at which the Purchaser will reoffer and sell the Bonds to the public, and the Municipal Advisor's Certificate attached hereto as Exhibit B. ARTICLE II SPECIFIC CERTIFICATIONS, REPRESENTATIONS AND AGREEMENTS The Issuer hereby certifies, represents and agrees as follows: Con Section IL 1 Authoritv to Certifv and Expectations (a) The undersigned officer of the Issuer along with other officers of the Issuer, are charged with the responsibility of issuing the Bonds. (b) This Certificate is being executed and delivered in part for the purposes specified in Section 1.148-2(b)(2) of the Regulations and is intended (among other purposes) to establish reasonable expectations of the Issuer at this time. (c) The Issuer has not been notified of any disqualification or proposed disqualification of it by the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service as a bond issuer which may certify bond issues under Section 1.148-2(b)(2) of the Regulations. (d) The certifications, representations and agreements set forth in this Article II are made on the basis of the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date hereof, including the following: (1) with respect to amounts expected to be received from delivery of the Bonds, amounts actually received, (2) with respect to payments of amounts into various funds or accounts, review of the authorizations or directions for such payments made by the Issuer pursuant to the Resolution and this Certificate, (3) with respect to the Issue Price, the certifications of the Purchasers as set forth in the Verification Certificate, (4) with respect to expenditure of the Proceeds of the Bonds, actual expenditures and reasonable expectations of the Issuer as to when the Proceeds will be spent for purposes of the Project, and (5) with respect to Bond Yield, review of the Verification Certificate. The Issuer has no reason to believe such facts, estimates or circumstances are untrue or incomplete in any material way. (e) To the best of the knowledge and belief of the undersigned officer of the Issuer, there are no facts, estimates or circumstances that would materially change the representations, certifications or agreements set forth in this Certificate, and the expectations herein set out are reasonable. (f) No arrangement exists under which the payment of principal or interest on the Bonds would be directly or indirectly guaranteed by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof. (g) After the expiration of any applicable temporary periods, and excluding investments in a bona fide debt service fund or reserve fund, not more than five percent (5%) of the Proceeds of the Bonds will be (a) used to make loans which are guaranteed by the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or (b) invested in federally insured deposits or accounts. (h) The Issuer will file with the Internal Revenue Service in a timely fashion Form 8038-G, Information Return for Tax -Exempt Governmental Obligations with respect to the Bonds and such other reports required to comply with the Code and applicable Regulations. (i) The Issuer will take no action which would cause the Bonds to become "private activity bonds" as defined in Section 141 (a) of the Code, including any use of 7 the Project by any person other than a governmental unit if such use will be by other than a member of the general public. None of the Proceeds of the Bonds will be used directly or indirectly to make or finance loans to any person other than a governmental unit. 0) The Issuer will make no change in the nature or purpose of the Project except as provided in Section 6.1 hereof. (k) Except as provided in the Resolution, the Issuer will not establish any sinking fund, bond fund, reserve fund, debt service fund or other fund reasonably expected to be used to pay debt service on the Bonds (other than the Bond Fund), exercise its option to redeem Bonds prior to maturity or effect a refunding of the Bonds. (1) No bonds or other obligations of the Issuer (1) were sold in the 15 days preceding the date of sale of the Bonds, (2) were sold or will be sold within the 15 days after the date of sale of the Bonds, (3) have been delivered in the past 15 days or (4) will be delivered in the next 15 days pursuant to a common plan of financing for the issuance of the Bonds and payable out of substantially the same source of revenues. (m) None of the Proceeds of the Bonds will be used directly or indirectly to replace funds of the Issuer used directly or indirectly to acquire obligations having a yield higher than the Bond Yield. (n) No portion of the Bonds is issued for the purpose of investing such portion at a higher yield than the Bond Yield. (o) The Issuer does not expect that the Proceeds of the Bonds will be used in a manner that would cause them to be "arbitrage bonds" as defined in Section 148(a) of the Code. The Issuer does not expect that the Proceeds of the Bonds will be used in a manner that would cause the interest on the Bonds to be includible in the gross income of the owners of the Bonds under the Code. The Issuer will not intentionally use any portion of the Proceeds to acquire higher yielding investments. (p) The Issuer will not use the Proceeds of the Bonds to exploit the difference between tax-exempt and taxable interest rates to obtain a material financial advantage. (q) The Issuer has not issued more Bonds, issued the Bonds earlier, or allowed the Bonds to remain outstanding longer than is reasonably necessary to accomplish the governmental purposes of the Bonds. In fact, the Bonds will not remain outstanding longer than 120% of the economic useful life of the assets financed with the Proceeds of the Bonds. (r) The Bonds will not be Hedge Bonds as described in Section 149(g)(3) of the Code because the Issuer reasonably expects that it will meet the Expenditure test set forth in Section 2.5(b) hereof and that 50% or more of the Proceeds will not be invested in Nonpurpose Investments having a substantially guaranteed yield for four or more years. Except for costs of issuance, all Sale Proceeds and investment earnings thereon will be expended for costs of the type that would be chargeable to capital accounts under the Code pursuant to federal income tax principles if the Issuer were treated as a corporation subject to federal income taxation. Section I1.2 Receipts and Expenditures of Sale Proceeds Sale Proceeds (par plus re -offering premium of $1,463,545.65), less underwriter's discount of $44,167.50, received at Closing are expected to be deposited and expended as follows: (a) $72,540.00 representing costs of issuing the Bonds will be used within six months of the Closing Date to pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds (with any excess remaining on deposit in the Project Fund); and (b) $12,671,838.15 will be deposited into the Project Construction Fund and will be used together with earnings thereon to pay the costs of the Project and will not exceed the amount necessary to accomplish the governmental purposes of the Bonds. Section II.3 Purpose of Bonds The Issuer is issuing the Bonds to pay the costs of the opening, widening, extending, grading and drainage of the right-of-way of streets, highways, avenues, alleys, and public grounds; the construction, reconstruction, and repairing of any street and streetscape improvements, with related utility work, traffic control devices, lighting, sidewalks, and the acquisition of real estate for such purposes; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of bridges; the rehabilitation and improvement of parks already owned, including facilities, equipment and improvements commonly found in city parks; equipping the fire department; the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, and equipping of works and facilities useful for the collection and disposal of solid waste ; the acquisition, construction and reconstruction of facilities for the public works department, including sand and salt storage bunkers; the construction, reconstruction, enlargement, improvement, and repair of trails and recreational areas; and improvements to and equipping of the Senior Center facility. Section II.4 Facts Supporting Tax -Exemption Classification Governmental Bonds Private Business Use/Private Security or Payment Tests The Bonds are considered to be governmental bonds, not subject to the provisions of the alternate minimum tax. The Proceeds will be used for the purposes described in Section 2.3 hereof. These bonds are not private activity bonds because no amount of Proceeds of the Bonds is to be used in a trade or business carried on by a non- governmental unit. Rather, the Proceeds will be used to finance the general government operations and facilities of the Issuer described in Section 2.3 hereof. None of the payment of principal or interest on the Bonds will be derived from, or secured by, money 9 or property used in a trade or business of a non-governmental unit. In addition, none of the governmental operations or facilities of the Issuer being financed with the Proceeds of the Bonds are subject to any lease, management contract or other similar arrangement or to any arrangement for use other than as by the general public. Private Loan Financing Test No amount of Proceeds of the Bonds is to be used directly or indirectly to make or finance loans to persons other than governmental units. Section II.5 Facts Supporting Temporary Periods for Proceeds (a) Time Test. Not later than six months after the Closing Date, the Issuer will incur a substantial binding obligation to a third party to expend at least 5% of the net Sale Proceeds of the Bonds. (b) Expenditure Test. Not less than 85% of the net Sale Proceeds will be expended for Project costs, including the reimbursement of other funds expended to date, within a three-year temporary period from the Closing Date. (c) Due Diligence Test. Not later than six months after Closing, work on the Project will have commenced and will proceed with due diligence to completion. (d) Proceeds of the Bonds representing less than six months accrued interest on the Bonds will be spent within six months of this date to pay interest on the Bonds, and will be invested without restriction as to yield for a temporary period not in excess of six months. Section IL6 Resolution Funds at Restricted or Unrestricted Yield (a) Proceeds of the Bonds will be held and accounted for in the manner provided in the Resolution. The Issuer has not and does not expect to create or establish any other bond fund, reserve fund, or similar fund or account for the Bonds. The Issuer has not and will not pledge any moneys or Taxable Obligations in order to pay debt service on the Bonds or restrict the use of such moneys or Taxable Obligations so as to give reasonable assurances of their availability for such purposes. (b) Any monies which are invested beyond a temporary period are expected to constitute less than a major portion of the Bonds or to be restricted for investment at a yield not greater than one-eighth of one percent above the Bond Yield. (c) The Issuer has established and will use the Bond Fund primarily to achieve a proper matching of revenues and debt service within each Bond Year and the Issuer will apply moneys deposited into the Bond Fund to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. Such Fund will be depleted at least once each Bond Year except for a reasonable carryover amount. The carryover amount will not exceed the greater of (1) one year's earnings on the Bond Fund or (2) one -twelfth of Annual Debt Service. The Issuer will spend moneys deposited from time to time into such fund within 13 months 10 after the date of deposit. Revenues, intended to be used to pay debt service on the Bonds, will be deposited into the Bond Fund as set forth in the Resolution. The Issuer will spend interest earned on moneys in such fund not more than 12 months after receipt. Accordingly, the Issuer will treat the Bond Fund as a bona fide debt service fund as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(b). Investment of amounts on deposit in the Bond Fund will not be subject to arbitrage rebate requirements as the Bonds meet the safe harbor set forth in Regulation 1.148-3(k), because the average annual debt service on the Bonds will not exceed $2,500,000. (d) The Minor Portion of the Bonds will be invested without regard to yield. Section II.7 Pertaining to Yields (a) The purchase price of all Taxable Obligations to which restrictions apply under this Certificate as to investment yield or rebate of Excess Earnings, if any, has been and shall be calculated using (i) the price taking into account discount, premium and accrued interest, as applicable, actually paid or (ii) the fair market value if less than the price actually paid and if such Taxable Obligations were not purchased directly from the United States Treasury. The Issuer will acquire all such Taxable Obligations directly from the United States Treasury or in an arm's length transaction without regard to any amounts paid to reduce the yield on such Taxable Obligations. The Issuer will not pay or permit the payment of any amounts (other than to the United States) to reduce the yield on any Taxable Obligations. Obligations pledged to the payment of debt service on the Bonds, or deposited into any reserve fund after they have been acquired by the Issuer will be treated as though they were acquired for their fair market value on the date of such pledge or deposit. Obligations on deposit in any reserve fund on the Closing Date shall be treated as if acquired for their fair market value on the Closing Date. (b) Qualified guarantees have not been used in computing yield. (c) The Bond Yield has been computed as not less than 0.740313 percent. This Bond Yield has been computed on the basis of a purchase price for the Bonds equal to the Issue Price. ARTICLE III REBATE Section III.1 Records Sale Proceeds of the Bonds will be held and accounted for in the manner provided in the Resolution. The Issuer will maintain adequate records for funds created by the Resolution and this Certificate including all deposits, withdrawals, transfers from, transfers to, investments, reinvestments, sales, purchases, redemptions, liquidations and use of money or obligations until six years after the Final Bond Retirement Date. 11 Section III.2 Rebate Fund (a) In the Resolution, the Issuer has covenanted to pay to the United States the Rebate Amount, an amount equal to the Excess Earnings on the Gross Proceeds Funds, if any, at the times and in the manner required or permitted and subject to stated special rules and allowable exceptions. (b) The Issuer may establish a fund pursuant to the Resolution and this Certificate which is herein referred to as the Rebate Fund. The Issuer will invest and expend amounts on deposit in the Rebate Fund in accordance with this Certificate. (c) Moneys in the Rebate Fund shall be held by the Issuer or its designee and, subject to Sections 3.4, 3.5 and 6.1 hereof, shall be held for future payment to the United States as contemplated under the provisions of this Certificate and shall not constitute part of the trust estate held for the benefit of the owners of the Bonds or the Issuer. (d) The Issuer will pay to the United States from legally available money of the Issuer (whether or not such available money is on deposit in any fund or account related to the Bonds) any amount which is required to be paid to the United States. Section III.3 Exceptions to Rebate The Issuer reasonably expects that the Bonds are eligible for one or more exceptions from the arbitrage rebate rules set forth in the Regulations. If any Proceeds are ineligible, or become ineligible, for an exception to the arbitrage rebate rules, the Issuer will comply with the provisions of this Article III. A description of the applicable rebate exception(s) is as follows: Eighteen -Month Exception The Gross Proceeds of the Bonds are expected to be expended for the governmental purposes for which the Bonds were issued in accordance with the following schedule: 1) 15 percent spent within six months of the Closing Date; 2) 60 percent spent within one year of the Closing Date; 3) 100 percent spent within eighteen months of the Closing Date (subject to 5 percent retainage for not more than one year). In any event, the Issuer expects that the 5% reasonable retainage will be spent within 30 months of the Closing Date. For purposes of determining compliance with the six-month and twelve- month spending periods, the amount of investment earnings included shall be based on the Issuer's reasonable expectations that the average annual interest rate on investments will be not more than 5%. For purposes of determining compliance with the eighteen -month spending period, the amount of investment earnings included shall be based on actual earnings. If the Issuer fails to meet the foregoing expenditure schedule, the Issuer shall comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of the Code. 12 Election to Treat as Construction Bonds. The Issuer reasonably expects that more than 75 percent of the "available construction proceeds" ("ACP") of the Bonds, as defined in Section 148(f)(4)(C)(vi) of the Code, will be used for construction expenditures. ACP includes the issue price of the issue plus the earnings on such issue. Not less than the following percentages of the ACP will be spent within the following periods: 1) 10 percent spent within six months of the Closing Date; 2) 45 percent spent within one year of the Closing Date; 3) 75 percent spent within eighteen months of the Closing Date; 4) 100 percent spent within two years of the Closing Date (subject to 5 percent retainage for not more than one year). In any event, the Issuer expects that the 5% reasonable retainage will be spent within a three-year period beginning on the Closing Date. A failure to spend an amount that does not exceed the lesser of (i) 3% of the issue price or (ii) $250,000, is disregarded if the Issuer exercises due diligence to complete the Project. Election with respect to future earnings Pursuant to Section 1.148-7(f)(2) of the Regulations, the Issuer elects to use actual investment earnings of the ACP in determining compliance with the above schedule. If the Issuer fails to meet the foregoing expenditure schedule, the Issuer shall comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of the Code. Section III.4 Calculation of Rebate Amount (a) As soon after each Computation Date as practicable, the Issuer shall, if necessary, calculate and determine the Excess Earnings on the Gross Proceeds Funds (the "Rebate Amount"). All calculations and determinations with respect to the Rebate Amount will be made on the basis of actual facts as of the Computation Date and reasonable expectations as to future events. (b) If the Rebate Amount exceeds the amount currently on deposit in the Rebate Fund, the Issuer may deposit an amount in the Rebate Fund such that the balance in the Rebate Fund after such deposit equals the Rebate Amount. If the amount in the Rebate Fund exceeds the Rebate Amount, the Issuer may withdraw such excess amount provided that such withdrawal can be made from amounts originally transferred to the Rebate Fund and not from earnings thereon, which may not be transferred, and only if such withdrawal may be made without liquidating investments at a loss. 13 Section III.5 Rebate Reauirements and the Bond Fund It is expected that the Bond Fund described in the Resolution and Section 2.6(c) of this Certificate will be treated as a bona fide debt service fund as defined in Regulation 1.148-1(b). As such, any amount earned during a Bond Year on the Bond Fund and amounts earned on such amounts, if allocated to the Bond Fund, will not be taken into account in calculating the Rebate Amount for the reasons outlined in Section 2.6(c) hereof. However, should the Bond Fund cease to be treated as a bona fide debt service fund, the Bond Fund will become subject to the rebate requirements set forth in Section 3.4 hereof. Section III.6 Investment of the Rebate Fund (a) Immediately upon a transfer to the Rebate Fund, the Issuer may invest all amounts in the Rebate Fund not already invested and held in the Rebate Fund, to the extent possible, in (1) SLGS, such investments to be made at a yield of not more than one-eighth of one percent above the Bond Yield, (2) Tax Exempt Obligations, (3) direct obligations of the United States or (4) certificates of deposit of any bank or savings and loan association. All investments in the Rebate Fund shall be made to mature not later than the next Rebate Payment Date. (b) If the Issuer invests in SLGS, the Issuer shall file timely subscription forms for such securities (if required). To the extent possible, amounts received from maturing SLGS shall be reinvested immediately in zero yield SLGS maturing on or before the next Rebate Payment Date. Section III.7 Payment to the United States (a) On each Rebate Payment Date, the Issuer will pay to the United States at least ninety percent (90%) of the Rebate Amount less a computation credit of $1,000 per Bond Year for which the payment is made. (b) The Issuer will pay to the United States not later than sixty (60) days after the Final Bond Retirement Date all the rebatable arbitrage as of such date and any income attributable to such rebatable arbitrage as described in Regulation 1.148-3(f)(2). (c) If necessary, on each Rebate Payment Date, the Issuer will mail a check to the Internal Revenue Service Center, Ogden, UT 84201. Each payment shall be accompanied by a copy of Form 8038-T, Arbitrage Rebate, filed with respect to the Bonds or other information reporting form as is required to comply with the Code and applicable Regulations. Section III.8 Records (a) The Issuer will keep and retain adequate records with respect to the Bonds, the Gross Proceeds Funds, the Bond Fund, and the Rebate Fund until six years after the Final Bond Retirement Date. Such records shall include descriptions of all calculations of amounts transferred to the Rebate Fund, if any, and descriptions of all calculations of amounts paid to the United States as required by this Certificate. Such 14 records will also show all amounts earned on moneys invested in such funds, and the actual dates and amounts of all principal, interest and redemption premiums (if any) paid on the Bonds. (b) Records relating to the investments in such Funds shall completely describe all transfers, deposits, disbursements and earnings including: (1) a complete list of all investments and reinvestments of amounts in each such Fund including, if applicable, purchase price, purchase date, type of security, accrued interest paid, interest rate, dated date, principal amount, date of maturity, interest payment dates, date of liquidation, receipt upon liquidation, market value of such investment on the Final Bond Retirement Date if held by the Issuer on the Final Bond Retirement Date, and market value of the investment on the date pledged to the payment of the Bonds or the Closing Date if different from the purchase date. (2) the amount and source of each payment to, and the amount, purpose and payee of each payment from, each such Fund. Section III.9 Additional Payments The Issuer hereby agrees to pay to the United States from legally available money of the Issuer (whether or not such available money is on deposit in any fund or account related to the Bonds) any amount which is required to be paid to the United States, but which is not available in a fund related to the Bonds for transfer to the Rebate Fund or payment to the United States. ARTICLE IV INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS Section IV.1 Avoidance of Prohibited Payments The Issuer will not enter into any transaction that reduces the amount required to be deposited into the Rebate Fund or paid to the United States because such transaction results in a smaller profit or a larger loss than would have resulted if the transaction had been at arm's length and had the Bond Yield not been relevant to either party. The Issuer will not invest or direct the investment of any funds in a manner which reduces an amount required to be paid to the United States because such transaction results in a small profit or larger loss than would have resulted if the transaction had been at arm's length and had the Bond Yield not been relevant to the Issuer. In particular, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or in the Resolution, the Issuer will not invest or direct the investment of any funds in a manner which would violate any provision of this Article IV. Section IV.2 Market Price Requirement (a) The Issuer will not purchase or direct the purchase of Taxable Obligations for more than the then available market price for such Taxable Obligations. The Issuer 15 will not sell, liquidate or direct the sale or liquidation of Taxable Obligations for less than the then available market price. (b) For purposes of this Certificate, United States Treasury obligations purchased directly from the United States Treasury will be deemed to be purchased at the market price. Section IV.3 Investment in Certificates of Deposit (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein or in the Resolution, the Issuer will invest or direct the investment of funds on deposit in the Reserve Fund, any other Gross Proceeds Fund, the Bond Fund, and the Rebate Fund, in a certificate of deposit of a bank or savings bank which is permitted by law and by the Resolution only if the purchase price of such a certificate of deposit is treated as its fair market value on the purchase date and if the yield on the certificate of deposit is not less than (1) the yield on reasonably comparable direct obligations of the United States; and (2) the highest yield that is published or posted by the provider to be currently available from the provider on reasonably comparable certificates of deposit offered to the public. (b) The certificate of deposit described in paragraph 4.3(a) above must be executed by a dealer who maintains an active secondary market in comparable certificates of deposit and must be based on actual trades adjusted to reflect the size and term of that certificate of deposit and the stability and reputation of the bank or savings bank issuing the certificate of deposit. Section IVA Investment Pursuant to Investment Contracts and Agreements The Issuer will invest or direct the investment of funds on deposit in the Gross Proceeds Funds, the Bond Fund, and the Rebate Fund pursuant to an investment contract (including a repurchase agreement) only if all of the following requirements are satisfied: (a) The Issuer makes a bona fide solicitation for the purchase of the investment. A bona fide solicitation is a solicitation that satisfies all of the following requirements: (1) The bid specifications are in writing and are timely forwarded to potential providers. (2) The bid specifications include all material terms of the bid. A term is material if it may directly or indirectly affect the yield or the cost of the investment. (3) The bid specifications include a statement notifying potential providers that submission of a bid is a representation that the potential provider did not consult with any other potential provider about its bid, that the bid was determined without regard to any other formal or informal agreement that the potential provider has with the issuer or any other person (whether or not in connection with the Bonds), and that the bid is not being submitted solely as a 16 courtesy to the issuer or any other person for purposes of satisfying the requirements of paragraph (d)(6)(iii)(B)(1) or (2) of Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations. (4) The terms of the bid specifications are commercially reasonable. A term is commercially reasonable if there is a legitimate business purpose for the term other than to increase the purchase price or reduce the yield of the investment. (5) For purchases of guaranteed investment contracts only, the terms of the solicitation take into account the Issuer's reasonably expected deposit and drawdown schedule for the amounts to be invested. (6) All potential providers have an equal opportunity to bid and no potential provider is given the opportunity to review other bids (i.e., a last look) before providing a bid. (7) At least three reasonably competitive providers are solicited for bids. A reasonably competitive provider is a provider that has an established industry reputation as a competitive provider of the type of investments being purchased. (b) The bids received by the Issuer meet all of the following requirements: (1) The Issuer receives at least three bids from providers that the Issuer solicited under a bona fide solicitation meeting the requirements of paragraph (d)(6)(iii)(A) of Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations and that do not have a material financial interest in the issue. A lead underwriter in a negotiated underwriting transaction is deemed to have a material financial interest in the issue until 15 days after the issue date of the issue. In addition, any entity acting as a financial advisor with respect to the purchase of the investment at the time the bid specifications are forwarded to potential providers has a material financial interest in the issue. A provider that is a related party to a provider that has a material financial interest in the issue is deemed to have a material financial interest in the issue. (2) At least one of the three bids described in paragraph (d)(6)(iii)(13)(1) of Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations is from a reasonably competitive provider, within the meaning of paragraph (d)(6)(iii)(A)(7) of Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations. (3) If the Issuer uses an agent to conduct the bidding process, the agent did not bid to provide the investment. (c) The winning bid meets the following requirements: 17 (1) Guaranteed investment contracts. If the investment is a guaranteed investment contract, the winning bid is the highest yielding bona fide bid (determined net of any broker's fees). (2) Other investments. If the investment is not a guaranteed investment contract, the winning bid is the lowest cost bona fide bid (including any broker's fees). (d) The provider of the investments or the obligor on the guaranteed investment contract certifies the administrative costs that it pays (or expects to pay, if any) to third parties in connection with supplying the investment. (e) The Issuer will retain the following records with the bond documents until three years after the last outstanding bond is redeemed: (1) For purchases of guaranteed investment contracts, a copy of the contract, and for purchases of investments other than guaranteed investment contracts, the purchase agreement or confirmation. (2) The receipt or other record of the amount actually paid by the Issuer for the investments, including a record of any administrative costs paid by the Issuer, and the certification under paragraph (d)(6)(iii)(D) of Section 1.148-5 of the Regulations. (3) For each bid that is submitted, the name of the person and entity submitting the bid, the time and date of the bid, and the bid results. (4) The bid solicitation form and, if the terms of the purchase agreement or the guaranteed investment contract deviated from the bid solicitation form or a submitted bid is modified, a brief statement explaining the deviation and stating the purpose for the deviation. (5) For purchases of investments other than guaranteed investment contracts, the cost of the most efficient portfolio of State and Local Government Series Securities, determined at the time that the bids were required to be submitted pursuant to the terms of the bid specifications. Section IV.5 Records The Issuer will maintain records of all purchases, sales, liquidations, investments, reinvestments, redemptions, disbursements, deposits, and transfers of amounts on deposit. Section IV.6 Investments to be Legal All investments required to be made pursuant to this Certificate shall be made to the extent permitted by law. In the event that any such investment is determined to be ultra vires, it shall be liquidated and the proceeds thereof shall be invested in a legal investment, provided that prior to reinvesting such proceeds, the Issuer shall obtain an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that such reinvestment will not cause the Bonds to become arbitrage bonds under Sections 103, 148, 149, or any other applicable provision of the Code. ARTICLE V GENERAL COVENANTS The Issuer hereby covenants to perform all acts within its power necessary to ensure that the reasonable expectations set forth in Article II hereof will be realized. The Issuer reasonably expects to comply with all covenants contained in this Certificate. ARTICLE VI AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS Section VI.1 Opinion of Bond Counsel, Amendments The various provisions of this Certificate need not be observed and this Certificate may be amended or supplemented at any time by the Issuer if the Issuer receives an opinion or opinions of Bond Counsel that the failure to comply with such provisions will not cause any of the Bonds to become "arbitrage bonds" under the Code and that the terms of such amendment or supplement will not cause any of the Bonds to become "arbitrage bonds" under the Code, or otherwise cause interest on any of the Bonds to become includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Section VI.2 Additional Covenants, Agreements The Issuer hereby covenants to make, execute and enter into (and to take such actions, if any, as may be necessary to enable it to do so) such agreements as may be necessary to comply with any changes in law or regulations in order to preserve the tax-exempt status of the Bonds to the extent that it may lawfully do so. The Issuer further covenants (1) to impose such limitations on the investment or use of moneys or investments related to the Bonds, (2) to make such payments to the United States Treasury, (3) to maintain such records, (4) to perform such calculations, and (5) to perform such other lawful acts as may be necessary to preserve the tax- exempt status of the Bonds. Section VL3 Internal Revenue Service Audits The Internal Revenue Service has not audited the Issuer regarding any obligations issued by or on behalf of the Issuer. To the best knowledge of the Issuer, no such obligations of the Issuer are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. 19 Section VIA Amendments Except as otherwise provided in Section 6.1 hereof, all the rights, powers, duties and obligations of the Issuer shall be irrevocable and binding upon the Issuer and shall not be subject to amendment or modification by the Issuer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer has caused this Certificate to be executed by its duly authorized officer, all as of the day first above written. (SEAL) RE Finance Director, City of Iowa City, State of Iowa EXHIBIT A IOWA CITY, IOWA - $11,325,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2021 ISSUE PRICE CERTIFICATE The undersigned, on behalf of KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc, ("Purchaser"), hereby certifies as set forth below with respect to the sale of the above -captioned obligations (the "Bonds"). 1. Reasonably Expected Initial Offering Price. a) As of the Sale Date, the reasonably expected initial offering prices of the Bonds to the Public by Purchaser are the prices listed in Schedule A (the "Expected Offering Prices"). The Expected Offering Prices are the prices for the Maturities of the Bonds used by Purchaser in formulating its bid to purchase the Bonds. Attached as Schedule B is a true and correct copy of the bid provided by Purchaser to purchase the Bonds. its bid. b) Purchaser was not given the opportunity to review other bids prior to submitting C) The bid submitted by Purchaser constituted a firm offer to purchase the Bonds. 2. Defined Terms. a) Maturity means Bonds with the same credit and payment terms. Bonds with different maturity dates, or Bonds with the same maturity date but different stated interest rates, are treated as separate Maturities. b) Public means any person (including an individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, company, or corporation) other than an Underwriter or a related party to an Underwriter. The term "related party" for purposes of this certificate generally means any two or more persons who have greater than 50 percent common ownership, directly or indirectly. C) Sale Date means the first day on which there is a binding contract in writing for the sale of a Maturity of the Bonds. The Sale Date of the Bonds is May 4, 2021. d) Underwriter means (i) the Purchaser or any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract with the Issuer (or with the lead underwriter to form an underwriting syndicate) to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public, and (ii) any person that agrees pursuant to a written contract directly or indirectly with a person described in clause (i) of this paragraph to participate in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public (including a member of a selling group or a party to a retail distribution agreement participating in the initial sale of the Bonds to the Public). The representations set forth in this certificate are limited to factual matters only. Nothing in this certificate represents Purchaser's interpretation of any laws, including specifically Sections 103 and 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the 21 Treasury Regulations thereunder. The undersigned understands that the foregoing information will be relied upon by the Issuer with respect to certain of the representations set forth in the Tax Exemption Certificate and with respect to compliance with the federal income tax rules affecting the Bonds, and by Ahlers & Cooney, P.C. as bond counsel in connection with rendering its opinion that the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, the preparation of the Internal Revenue Service Form 8038-G, and other federal income tax advice that it may give to the Issuer from time to time relating to the Bonds. Dated: June 1, 2021 22 KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Name: SCHEDULE A EXPECTED OFFERING PRICES (Attached) 23 SCHEDULE B COPY OF UNDERWRITER'S BID (Attached) 24 EXHIBIT B IOWA CITY, IOWA - $11,325,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2021 CERTIFICATE OF MUNICIPAL ADVISOR The undersigned, on behalf of Speer Financial (the "Municipal Advisor"), as the municipal advisor to the City of Iowa City, Iowa in connection with the issuance of the above - captioned obligations (the "Bonds"), has assisted the Issuer in soliciting and receiving bids from potential underwriters in connection with the sale of the Bonds in a competitive bidding process in which bids were requested for the purchase of the Bonds at specified written terms, and hereby certifies as set forth below with respect to the bidding process and award of the Bonds. 1. The Bonds were offered for sale at specified written terms more particularly described in the Terms of Offering, which was distributed to potential bidders, a copy of which is attached to this certificate as Attachment 1. 2. The Terms of Offering were disseminated electronically through SPEERAUCTION. The method of distribution of the Terms of Offering is regularly used for purposes of disseminating notices of sale of new issuances of municipal bonds, and notices disseminated in such manner are widely available to potential bidders. 3. To the knowledge of the Municipal Advisor, all bidders were offered an equal opportunity to bid to purchase the Bonds so that, for example, if the bidding process afforded any opportunity for bidders to review other bids before providing a bid, no bidder was given an opportunity to review other bids that was not equally given to all other bidders (that is, no exclusive "last -look"). 4. The Issuer received bids from at least three bidders who represented that they have established industry reputations for underwriting new issuances of municipal bonds. Based upon the Municipal Advisor's knowledge and experience in acting as the municipal advisor for other municipal issues, the Municipal Advisor believes those representations to be accurate. Copies of the bids received are attached to this certificate as Attachment 2. 5. The winning bidder was KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. (the "Purchaser"), whose bid was determined to be the best conforming bid in accordance with the terms set forth in the Terms of Offering, as shown in the bid comparison attached as Attachment 3 to this certificate. The Issuer awarded the Bonds to the Purchaser. The representations set forth in this certificate are limited to factual matters only. Nothing in this certificate represents the Municipal Advisor's interpretation of any laws, including specifically Sections 103 and 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. The undersigned understands that the foregoing information will be relied upon by the Issuer with respect to certain of the representations set forth in the Tax Exemption Certificate and with respect to compliance with the federal income tax rules affecting the Bonds, and by Ahlers & Cooney, P.C. as bond counsel in connection with rendering its opinion that the interest on the Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes, the preparation of the Internal Revenue Service Form 8038-G, and other 25 federal income tax advice that it may give to the Issuer from time to time relating to the Bonds. No other persons may rely on the representations set forth in this certificate without the prior written consent of the Municipal Advisor. Dated: June 1, 2021 26 Speer Financial, Inc. Name: ATTACHMENT 1 TERMS OF OFFERING (Attached) 27 ATTACHMENT 2 BIDS RECEIVED (Attached) 01883172-1\10714-138 ATTACHMENT 3 BID COMPARISON (Attached) 29 CONTINUING DISCLOSURE CERTIFICATE This Continuing Disclosure Certificate (the "Disclosure Certificate") is executed and delivered by the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa (the "Issuer"), in connection with the issuance of $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 (the 'Bonds") dated June 1'202 1. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to a Resolution of the Issuer approved on May 18, 2021 (the "Resolution"). The Issuer covenants and agrees as follows: Section 1. Purpose of the Disclosure Certificate; Interpretation. This Disclosure Certificate is being executed and delivered by the Issuer for the benefit of the Holders and Beneficial Owners of the Bonds and in order to assist the Participating Underwriters in complying with S.E.C. Rule 15c2 -12(b)(5). This Disclosure Certificate shall be governed by, construed and interpreted in accordance with the Rule, and, to the extent not in conflict with the Rule, the laws of the State. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to require more than required by the Rule. Section 2. Definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in the Resolution, which apply to any capitalized term used in this Disclosure Certificate unless otherwise defined in this Section, the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings: "Annual Financial Information" shall mean financial information or operating data of the type included in the final Official Statement, provided at least annually by the Issuer pursuant to, and as described in, Sections 3 and 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. "Beneficial Owner" shall mean any person which (a) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, any Bonds (including persons holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of any Bonds for federal income tax purposes. "Business Day" shall mean a day other than a Saturday or a Sunday or a day on which banks in Iowa are authorized or required by law to close. "Dissemination Agent" shall mean the Issuer or any Dissemination Agent designated in writing by the Issuer and which has filed with the Issuer a written acceptance of such designation. "Financial Obligation" shall mean a (i) debt obligation; (ii) derivative instrument entered into in connection with, or pledged as security or a source of payment for, an existing or planned debt obligation; or (iii) guarantee of (i) or (ii). The term Financial Obligation shall not include municipal securities as to which a final official statement has been provided to the MSRB consistent with S.E.C. Rule 15c2-12. "Holders" shall mean the registered holders of the Bonds, as recorded in the registration books of the Registrar. "Listed Events" shall mean any of the events listed in Section 5(a) of this Disclosure Certificate. "Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board" or "MSRB" shall mean the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, 1300 I Street NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005. "National Repository" shall mean the MSRB's Electronic Municipal Market Access website, a/k/a "EMMA" (emma.msrb.org). "Official Statement" shall mean the Issuer's Official Statement for the Bonds, dated May 4, 2021. "Participating Underwriter" shall mean any of the original underwriters of the Bonds required to comply with the Rule in connection with offering of the Bonds. "Rule" shall mean Rule 15c2-12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (S.E.C.) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any guidance and procedures thereunder published by the S.E.C., as the same may be amended from time to time. "State" shall mean the State of Iowa. Section 3. Provision of Annual Financial Information. a) The Issuer shall, or shall cause the Dissemination Agent to, not later than two hundred ten (210) days after the end of the Issuer's fiscal year (presently June 30th), commencing with information for the 2020/2021 fiscal year, provide to the National Repository an Annual Financial Information filing consistent with the requirements of Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate. The Annual Financial Information filing must be submitted in such format as is required by the MSRB (currently in "searchable PDF" format). The Annual Financial Information filing may be submitted as a single document or as separate documents comprising a package. The Annual Financial Information filing may cross-reference other information as provided in Section 4 of this Disclosure Certificate; provided that the audited financial statements of the Issuer may be submitted separately from the balance of the Annual Financial Information filing and later than the date required above for the filing of the Annual Financial Information if they are not available by that date. If the Issuer's fiscal year changes, it shall give notice of such change in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(c). b) If the Issuer is unable to provide to the National Repository the Annual Financial Information by the date required in subsection (a), the Issuer shall send a notice to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, if any, in substantially the form attached as Exhibit A. c) The Dissemination Agent shall: i. each year file Annual Financial Information with the National Repository; and ii. (if the Dissemination Agent is other than the Issuer), file a report with the Issuer certifying that the Annual Financial Information has been filed pursuant to this Disclosure Certificate, stating the date it was filed. Section 4. Content of Annual Financial Information. The Issuer's Annual Financial Information filing shall contain or incorporate by reference the following: a) The last available audited financial statements of the Issuer for the prior fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as modified in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under State law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof. If the Issuer's audited financial statements for the preceding years are not available by the time Annual Financial Information is required to be filed pursuant to Section 3(a), the Annual Financial Information filing shall contain unaudited financial statements of the type included in the final Official Statement, and the audited financial statements shall be filed in the same manner as the Annual Financial Information when they become available. b) A table, schedule or other information prepared as of the end of the preceding fiscal year, of the type contained in the final Official Statement under the captions: • Debt Limit. • Direct Debt. • General Obligation Debt. • Statement of Bonded Indebtedness. • Other Obligations. • Percentages for Taxable Valuation After Rollbacks. • Building Permits. • Property Valuations and Trend of Valuations -Actual (100%) Valuations for the City. • Property Valuations and Trend of Valuations -Taxable ("Rollback") Valuations for the City. • Levies and Tax Collections. • Larger Taxpayers. • Tax Rates. • Statement of Net Position -Governmental Activities. • Statement of Activities -Governmental Activities. • Balance Sheet -General Fund. • Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -General Fund. Any or all of the items listed above may be included by specific reference to other documents, including official statements of debt issues of the Issuer or related public entities, which have been filed with the National Repository. The Issuer shall clearly identify each such other document so included by reference. Section 5. Reporting off Significant Events. a) Pursuant to the provisions of this Section, the Issuer shall give, or cause to be given, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds in a timely manner not later than 10 Business Days after the day of the occurrence of the event: i. Principal and interest payment delinquencies; ii. Non-payment related defaults, if material; iii. Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; iv. Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements relating to the Bonds reflecting financial difficulties; v. Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; vi. Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax-exempt status of the Series Bonds, or material events affecting the tax-exempt status of the Bonds; vii. Modifications to rights of Holders of the Bonds, if material; viii. Bond calls (excluding sinking fund mandatory redemptions), if material, and tender offers; ix. Defeasances of the Bonds; x. Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material; xi. Rating changes on the Bonds; xii. Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the Issuer; xiii. The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the Issuer or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Issuer, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; xiv. Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material; xv. Incurrence of a Financial Obligation of the Issuer, if material, or agreement to covenants, events of default, remedies, priority rights, or other similar terms of a Financial Obligation of the Issuer, any of which affect security holders, if material; and xvi. Default, event of acceleration, termination event, modification of terms or other similar events under the terms of a Financial Obligation of the Issuer, any of which reflect financial difficulties. b) Whenever the Issuer obtains the knowledge of the occurrence of a Listed Event, the Issuer shall determine if the occurrence is subject to notice only if material, and if so shall as soon as possible determine if such event would be material under applicable federal securities laws. c) If the Issuer determines that knowledge of the occurrence of a Listed Event is not subject to materiality, or determines such occurrence is subject to materiality and would be material under applicable federal securities laws, the Issuer shall promptly, but not later than 10 Business Days after the occurrence of the event, file a notice of such occurrence with the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board through the filing with the National Repository. Section 6. Termination of Reporting Obli ag tion. The Issuer's obligations under this Disclosure Certificate with respect to each Series of Bonds shall terminate upon the legal defeasance, prior redemption or payment in full of all of the Bonds of that Series or upon the Issuer's receipt of an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial action or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the Issuer to comply with the terms hereof will not cause Participating Underwriters to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Section 7. Dissemination Agent. The Issuer may, from time to time, appoint or engage a Dissemination Agent to assist it in carrying out its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate, and may discharge any such Agent, with or without appointing a successor Dissemination Agent. The Dissemination Agent shall not be responsible in any manner for the content of any notice or report prepared by the Issuer pursuant to this Disclosure Certificate. The initial Dissemination Agent shall be the Issuer. Section 8. Amendment; Waiver. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the Issuer may amend this Disclosure Certificate, and any provision of this Disclosure Certificate may be waived, provided that the following conditions are satisfied: a) If the amendment or waiver relates to the provisions of Section 3(a), 4, or 5(a), it may only be made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in legal requirements, change in law, or change in the identity, nature or status of an obligated person with respect to the Bonds, or the type of business conducted; b) The undertaking, as amended or taking into account such waiver, would, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, have complied with the requirements of the Rule at the time of the original issuance of the Bonds, after taking into account any amendments or interpretations of the Rule, as well as any change in circumstances; and c) The amendment or waiver either (i) is approved by the Holders of the Bonds in the same manner as provided in the Resolution for amendments to the Resolution with the consent of Holders, or (ii) does not, in the opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel, materially impair the interests of the Holders or Beneficial Owners of the Bonds. In the event of any amendment or waiver of a provision of this Disclosure Certificate, the Issuer shall describe such amendment in the next Annual Financial Information filing, and shall include, as applicable, a narrative explanation of the reason for the amendment or waiver and its impact on the type (or in the case of a change of accounting principles, on the presentation) of financial information or operating data being presented by the Issuer. In addition, if the amendment relates to the accounting principles to be followed in preparing financial statements, (i) notice of such change shall be given in the same manner as for a Listed Event under Section 5(c), and (ii) the Annual Financial Information filing for the year in which the change is made will present a comparison or other discussion in narrative form (and also, if feasible, in quantitative form) describing or illustrating the material differences between the financial statements as prepared on the basis of the new accounting principles and those prepared on the basis of the former accounting principles. Section 9. Additional Information. Nothing in this Disclosure Certificate shall be deemed to prevent the Issuer from disseminating any other information, using the means of dissemination set forth in this Disclosure Certificate or any other means of communication, or including any other information in any Annual Financial Information filing or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event, in addition to that which is required by this Disclosure Certificate. If the Issuer chooses to include any information in any Annual Financial Information filing or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event in addition to that which is specifically required by this Disclosure Certificate, the Issuer shall have no obligation under this Certificate to update such information or include it in any future Annual Financial Information filing or notice of occurrence of a Listed Event. Section 10. Default. In the event of a failure of the Issuer to comply with any provision of this Disclosure Certificate, any Holder or Beneficial Owner of the Bonds may take such actions as may be necessary and appropriate, including seeking mandate or specific performance by court order, to cause the Issuer to comply with its obligations under this Disclosure Certificate. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable by any person for any default hereunder and are hereby waived to the extent permitted by law. A default under this Disclosure Certificate shall not be deemed an event of default under the Resolution, and the sole remedy under this Disclosure Certificate in the event of any failure of the Issuer to comply with this Disclosure Certificate shall be an action to compel performance. Section 11. Duties Immunities and Liabilities of Dissemination Agent. The Dissemination Agent shall have only such duties as are specifically set forth in this Disclosure Certificate, and the Issuer agrees to indemnify and save the Dissemination Agent, its officers, directors, employees and agents, harmless against any loss, expense and liabilities which it may incur arising out of or in the exercise or performance of its powers and duties hereunder, including the costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) of defending against any claim of liability, but excluding liabilities due to the Dissemination Agent's negligence or willful misconduct. The obligations of the Issuer under this Section shall survive resignation or removal of the Dissemination Agent and payment of the Bonds. Section 12. Beneficiaries. This Disclosure Certificate shall inure solely to the benefit of the Issuer, the Dissemination Agent, the Participating Underwriters and Holders and Beneficial Owners from time to time of the Bonds, and shall create no rights in any other person or entity. Section 13. Rescission Rights. The Issuer hereby reserves the right to rescind this Disclosure Certificate without the consent of the Holders in the event the Rule is repealed by the S.E.C. or is ruled invalid by a federal court and the time to appeal from such decision has expired. In the event of a partial repeal or invalidation of the Rule, the Issuer hereby reserves the right to rescind those provisions of this Disclosure Certificate that were required by those parts of the Rule that are so repealed or invalidated. Date: ATTEST. By: Ci Clerk day of 2021, CITY OF IOWA CITY, STATE OF IOWA By:y"A�— 4aY 1 M — EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO NATIONAL REPOSITORY OF FAILURE TO FILE ANNUAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION Name of Issuer: City of Iowa City, Iowa. Name of Bond Issue: $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 Dated Date of Issue: June 1, 2021 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Issuer has not provided Annual Financial Information with respect to the above-named Bonds as required by Section 3 of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate delivered by the Issuer in connection with the Bonds. The Issuer anticipates that the Annual Financial Information will be filed by Dated: day of , 20 01860216-1\10714-138 CITY OF IOWA CITY, STATE OF IOWA By: Its: DELIVERY CERTIFICATE We the undersigned City Officials, do hereby certify that we are the officers, respectively below indicated, of a municipal corporation in the State of Iowa, known as the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa; that in pursuance of the provisions of Sections 384.25, 384.26 and 384.28 of the Code of Iowa, there have been heretofore lawfully authorized and this day by us lawfully executed, issued, caused to be registered, authenticated and delivered fully registered General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021, of the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, in the amount of $11,325,000, dated June 1, 2021, bearing interest and maturing as follows: Principal Interest Maturity Amount Rate June 1st $1,135,000 5.000% 2022 $1,135,000 5.000% 2023 $1,135,000 5.000% 2024 $1,135,000 5.000% 2025 $1,135,000 5.000% 2026 $1,135,000 5.000% 2027 $1,135,000 3.000% 2028 $1,135,000 3.000% 2029 $1,135,000 2.000% 2030 $1,110,000 2.000% 2031 Each of the Bonds has been executed with the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor and the manual or facsimile signature of the City Clerk of the City. The Bonds have been delivered to DTC on behalf of: KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. of Denver, Colorado and have been paid for in accordance with the terms of the contract of sale and at a price of $12,744,378.15, and accrued interest. We further certify that no controversy or litigation is pending, prayed or threatened involving the incorporation, organization, existence or boundaries of the City, or the titles of the undersigned City officers to their respective positions, or the validity of the Bonds, or the power and duty of the City to provide and apply adequate taxes for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest of the Bonds, and that no measure or provision for the authorization or issuance of the Bonds has been repealed or rescinded. We further certify that due provision has been made for the collection of sufficient taxes to meet all payments coming due, whether of principal or of interest on the Bond Issue; that all payments coming due before the next collection of the tax provided for as aforesaid will be paid promptly when due from cash on hand; and that the proceedings authorizing the issuance and delivery of the Bonds remain in full force and effect and have not been withdrawn, amended or rescinded. To the best of our knowledge, information and belief, we further certify that the Official Statement dated May 4, 2021, as of its date and the date hereof, did not and does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. We further certify that each of the officers whose signatures appear on the Bonds were in occupancy and possession of their respective offices at the time the Bonds were executed and do hereby adopt and affirm their signatures appearing in the Bonds. We further certify that the present financial condition of the Bond is as follows: Assessed and taxable value of all taxable property within the City, except moneys and credits and tax free lands (Year 2021/2022), according to the last completed State and County tax lists (100% - Before Rollback) Total general obligation bonded indebtedness of the City, including this issue All other general obligation indebtedness, (including warrants, judgments, contracts of purchase or lease/purchase, self-insurance or local government risk pool obligations, loan agreements, and revenue bonds issued under Code Section 403.9), of the City of any kind $6,857,898,321 $53,935,000 $37,501,763 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto affixed our hands at the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, this day of , 2021. Finance Director (CITY SEAL) 01883374-1\10714-138 TRANSCRIPT CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, being first duly sworn, do hereby depose and certify that I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa, and that as such Clerk I have in my possession or have access to the complete corporate records of the City and of its Council and officials, and that I have carefully compared the transcript hereto attached with the aforesaid corporate records and that the transcript hereto attached is a true and complete copy of all the corporate records in relation to the authorization, issuance and disposition of $11,325,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021, of the City dated June 1, 2021, and that the transcript hereto attached contains a true and complete statement of all the measures adopted and proceedings, acts and things had, done and performed up to the present time, in relation to the authorization, issuance and disposition of the Bonds, and that the City Council consists of a Mayor and six (6) Council Members, and that the offices were duly and lawfully filled by the individuals listed in the attached transcript as of the dates and times referred to therein. I further certify that the City is and throughout the period of such proceedings has been governed under the Mayor/Council form of municipal government authorized by Chapter 372, Code of Iowa, under the provisions of its charter as recorded with the Secretary of State. I further certify that according to the records in my office, the named members of the Council were duly and regularly elected to such office, and were, during all of the year 2021, and now are, the legally elected, constituted and acting City Council of the City. I further certify that no litigation is pending, prayed or threatened affecting the validity of the Bonds hereinabove referred to, nor affecting the title of any of the City officers and Council Members to their official positions. I further certify that all meetings of the City Council of the City at which action was taken in connection with the Bonds were open to the public at all times in accordance with a notice of meeting and tentative agenda, a copy of which was timely served on each member of the Council and was duly given at least twenty-four hours prior to the commencement of the meeting by notification of the communications media having requested such notice and posted on a bulletin board or other prominent place designated for the purpose and easily accessible to the public at the principal office of the Council all pursuant to the provisions and in accordance with the conditions of the local rules of the Council and Chapter 21, Code of Iowa. I further certify that no City officer or employee has any interest in the contract for the sale of the Bonds or any matter incidental thereto, according to my best knowledge and belief. 4 day of WITNESS my hand and the seal of the City hereto attached this , 2021, at Iowa City, Iowa. (SEAL) City Cl rk, City of Iowa ity, State of low Finally, the below stated officers whose signatures appear hereafter are now the duly qualified and acting officials of the City, possessed of the offices as designated below, to -wit: Mayor: Bruce Teague (Original Signature) City Clerk: Kellie Fruehling (la (Original 1 ture) Finance Director: Dennis Bockenstedt (Original Signature) STATE OF IOWA ) SS COUNTY OF JOHNSON Subscribed and sworn to before me by Bruce Teague, Kellie Fruehling and Dennis Bockenstedt on this / B day of , 2021. (SEAL) 01883421-1\10714-138 Notary Pu lic m and for John n County, Iowa AUTHENTICATION ORDER The undersigned Finance Director of the City of Iowa City, State of Iowa (the "Issuer"), pursuant to a resolution of the City Council of the City of Iowa City, authorizing the issuance and delivery of the Bonds, acting for and on behalf of the Issuer, hereby deliver to U.S. Bank (the "Registrar") $11,325,000 aggregate principal amount of Issuer's General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021, dated June 1, 2021 in fully registered form, bearing interest, maturing and conforming to the specifications set forth in the Resolution (the "Bonds"). Each Bond has been executed on behalf of the Issuer with the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor and the manual or facsimile signature of the City Clerk. The signatures are hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. The seal of the Issuer is printed or impressed thereon. The Registrar is hereby requested to authenticate the Bonds and to complete the records with respect to registration as provided in the Bond Resolution and the instructions of the Original Purchaser as to designation of owners of the Bonds. Upon such authentication, the Registrar is authorized to deliver the Bonds on behalf of Issuer to the Original Purchaser, KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc., or their registered assigns, upon receipt of payment therefor in immediately available funds of the agreed purchase price plus accrued interest to the date of delivery as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, subject to the receipt at closing of the opinion of bond counsel. The Original Purchaser shall deposit the monies to the account of Issuer as designated in Exhibit A. The acknowledgment of receipt of the Bonds by the Original Purchasers, or registered assigns, shall be evidenced by separate signed receipts or certificates. Dated: this I day of f l L. , 2021 Finance Director (SEAL) EXHIBIT A Closing Amounts Deposit of Funds Instructions (See attached closing letter of the Financial Consultant) 01883432-1\10714-138 ,0.8038-G (Rev. September 2018) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Information Return for Tax -Exempt Governmental Bonds ► Under Internal Revenue Code section 149(e) ► See separate instructions. Caution: If the issue price is under$100,000, use Form 8038 -GC. ► Go to www.irs.gov/F8038G for instructions and the latest information. OMB No. 1545-0720 Part I Reporting Authority 1 Issuer's name City of Iowa City, lows If Amended Return, check here ► ❑ 2 Issuer's employer identification number (EIN) 42-6004805 3a Name of person (other than issuer) with whom the IRS may communicate about this return (see instructions) 3b Telephone number of other person shown on 3a 4 Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) 410 E. Washington Street Room/suite 5 Report number (For IRS Use Only) I3 1 8 City, town, or post office, state, and ZIP code Iowa City, Iowa 52240 8 Name of issue General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 7 Date of issue June 1, 2021 9 CUSIP number 10a Name and title of officer or other employee of the issuer whom the IRS may call for more information (see instructions) Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director 462308 P84 10b Telephone number of officer or other employee shown on 10a 319-356-5053 Part II Type of Issue (enter the issue price). See the instructions and attach schedule. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19a b Education Health and hospital Transportation Public safety Environment (including sewage bonds) Housing Utilities Other. Describe O. Parks and Recreational Facilities If bonds are TANs or RANs, check only box 19a If bonds are BANs, check only box 19b 20 If bonds are in the form of a lease or installment sale, check box 11 12 13 8,531,861 14 1,741,631 15 710,402 56 17 19 16 17 Part III Description of Bonds. Com • lete for the entire issue for which this form is bein+ filed. (a) Final maturity date (b) Issue price (c) Stated redemption price at maturity 21 06/01/2031 $ 12,788,545.6 $ $11,325,00 Uses of Proceeds of Bond Issue (including underwriters' discount) Proceeds used for accrued interest (d) Weighted average maturity Part IV 22 23 24 25 26 Issue price of entire issue (enter amount from line 21, column (b)) 18 1,804,650 73 (e) Yield 5.459 years 0.740313 % Proceeds used for bond issuance costs (including underwriters' discount) 24 Proceeds used for credit enhancement Proceeds allocated to reasonably required reserve or replacement fund 27 Proceeds used to refund prior tax-exempt bonds. Complete Part V . . 28 Proceeds used to refund prior taxable bonds. Complete Part V . . . . 29 Total (add lines 24 through 28) 30 Nonrefunding proceeds of the issue (subtract line 29 from line 23 and enter amount here) . 25 26 27 28 5116,707 50 22 -0- 23 $12,788,545 65 -0- -0- -0- -0- 29 $116,707 50 30 $12,671,838 15 Part V Description of Refunded Bonds. Complete this part only for refunding bonds. 31 Enter the remaining weighted average maturity of the tax-exempt bonds to be refunded . 32 Enter the remaining weighted average maturity of the taxable bonds to be refunded . . 33 Enter the last date on which the refunded tax-exempt bonds will be called (MM/DD/YYYY) . 34 Enter the date(s) the refunded bonds were issued ► (MM/DD/YYYY) years years For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see separate instructions. Cat. No. 63773S Form 8038-G (Rev. 9-2018) Form 8038-G (Rev. 9-2016) Page 2 Part VI Miscellaneous 35 Enter the amount of the state volume cap allocated to the issue under section 141(b)(5) . . 36a Enter the amount of gross proceeds invested or to be invested in a guaranteed investment contract (GIC). See instructions b Enter the final maturity date of the GIC ► (MM/DD/YYYY) c Enter the name of the GIC provider ► 37 Pooled financings: Enter the amount of the proceeds of this issue that are to be used to make loans to other governmental units 38a If this issue is a loan made from the proceeds of another tax-exempt issue, check box ► ❑ and enter the following information: b Enter the date of the master pool bond ► (MM/DD/YYYY) c Enter the EIN of the issuer of the master pool bond ► d Enter the name of the issuer of the master pool bond ► 39 If the issuer has designated the issue under section 265(b)(3)(B)(i)(III) (small issuer exception), check box ► ❑ 40 If the issuer has elected to pay a penalty in lieu of arbitrage rebate, check box ► ❑ 41a If the issuer has identified a hedge, check here ► ❑ and enter the following information: b Name of hedge provider c Type of hedge ► d Term of hedge ► 42 If the issuer has superintegrated the hedge, check box ► ❑ 43 If the issuer has established written procedures to ensure that all nonqualified bonds of this issue are remediated according to the requirements under the Code and Regulations (see instructions), check box ► 0 44 If the issuer has established written procedures to monitor the requirements of section 148, check box ► ❑ 45a If some portion of the proceeds was used to reimburse expenditures, check here ► ❑ and enter the amount of reimbursement ► b Enter the date the official intent was adopted ■ (MM/DD/YYYY) 35 -0- 36a -0- 37 -0- Signature and Consent Paid Preparer Use Only Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this retum and accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete. I further declare that I consent to the IRS's disclosure of the issuer's retum information, as necessary to processRRfS�etum, to the hat I have authorized above. Signature of issuer's authorized representative Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Date ' Type or print name and title Print/Type preparer's name Kristin Billingsley Cooper Preparer's signature Date Check self -em Firm's name ► Ahiera & Cooney, P.C. Firm's address ► 100 Court Avenue, Suite 600, Des Moines. Iowa 50309 Firm's EIN ► Phone no. ❑ if PTIN ployed P02001942 42-1323559 (515) 243-7611 Form 8038-G (Rev. 9-2018) $11,325,000 * City of Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa General Obligation Bonds, Series 2021 Best AON Bidder: Best AON TIC: KeyBanc Capital Markets 1.064508 % Serial/ Principal Sinker/ Due Amount * Term Coupon Jun 1, 2022 $1,135,000 Serial 5.000% Jun 1, 2023 $1,135,000 Serial 5.000% Jun 1, 2024 $1,135,000 Serial 5.000% Jun 1, 2025 $1,135,000 Serial 5.000% Jun 1, 2026 $1,135,000 Serial 5.000% Jun 1, 2027 $1,135,000 Serial 5.000% Jun 1, 2028 $1,135,000 Serial 3.000% Jun 1, 2029 $1,135,000 Serial 3.000% Jun 1, 2030 $1,135,000 Serial 2.000% Jun 1, 2031 $1,110,000 Serial 2.000% Purchase Price: $12,744,378.15 Spread: None Entered Time Submitted: May 4, 2021 at 11:56:31 AM EDT SpeerAuction Interest Cost Calculations (for informationaljurposes only) Issue Size $11,325,000 Gross Interest $2,128,800.00 Plus Discount/(Less Premium) (1,419,378.15) Total Interest Cost $709,421.85 True Interest Rate 1.064508% Total Bond Years 62,175.00 Average Life 5.490 Years Firm: key Banc Capital Markets *Preliminary, subject to change Signature: Title: Date: The foregoing bid as submitted or as revised post sale, if appropriate, was accepted and the Securities sold by action of this Board, and receipt is hereby acknowledged of the good faith Deposit, if any, which is being held in accordance with the terms of the annexed Official Notice of Sale. Signature: Title: Mayor COUNTY AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE I, 44- Of -Kr- r' 7 edit WWr , county Auditor of Johnson County, State of Iowa, hereby certify that on the 7_1 q day of /eji Item Number: 7.h. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest the FY2022 agreement between the City of Iowa City and the City of University Heights for the provision of transit service within the corporate limits of University Heights. Prepared By: Darian Nagle-Gamm; Director of Transportation Services Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin; City Manager Fiscal Impact: University Heights agrees to pay $40,042 in monthly payments of $3,336.83. Recommendations: Staff: Approval 19TOT171 17, T-7 721111100 1011 Attachments: Agreement Resolution Executive Summary: The City of Iowa City Transportation Services department currently operates transit service for the City of University Heights utilizing a 28E Agreement. This resolution will continue that service through FY22 for a contracted payment of $40,682. Background /Analysis: University Heights has contracted with the City of Iowa City for transit services since the 1970's. Currently Iowa City Transit provides service with five routes during peak service, which include the Melrose Express, Oakcrest, Plaen View, Westside, Hospital and Westwinds routes. This serves Melrose Avenue and Sunset Street with roughly 90 trips per day. Beginning August 2nd, Iowa City Transit will begin running new routes and schedules. Routes to University Heights include the 8 - Oakcrest, 10 - West Iowa City and 12 - Highway 1 that will serve Melrose Avenue, Sunset Street and Benton Street with approximately 96 trips per day. The contract amount is based on a formula which considers the current Consumer Price Index of 1.6% as an escalator of the previous year's contract. The University Heights City Council approved this agreement at theirApril 13th, 2021 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Agreement Iowa Secretary of State ytF,.� ••.. ys FILED 321 East 12th Street O a w Filing Date: 05/20/2021 11:01 AM mo Des Moines, IA 50319 . ,�� Filing Number: M513720 9 SFr y ARV OF sos.iowa.gov 28E Agreement Full Legal Name Organization Type County Party t City of Iowa City City Johnson Party 2 City of University Heights City Johnson Participants 410 - Public Transit Service Type FY2022 agreement between the City of Iowa City and the City of University Heights for the provision of transit service within the corporate limits of University Heights (Res 21-132) Purpose 06/30/2022 Duration 21-132.pdf Upload S: '-ireemeut Contact Person: (Optional) Kellie Contact First Name Fruehling Contact Last Name City Clark Job Title City Clerks office Department kellie-fruehling@iows-city.org Email Address 1 319-356-5041 Phone Prepared by: Darian Nagle-Gamm, 1200 S. Riverside Drive, Iowa City, IA 52245 (319) 356-5156 Resolution No. 21-132 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest the FY2022 agreement between the City of Iowa City and the City of University Heights for the provision of transit service within the corporate limits of University Heights. Whereas, Chapter 28E, Code of Iowa, provides, in substance, that any power which may be exercised by a public agency of this state may be exercised jointly with another public agency having such power; and Whereas, it is in the mutual interest of the City of Iowa City and the City of University Heights to encourage the use of public transit by residents of University Heights; and Whereas, the parties have negotiated a 28E Agreement for transit service in FY2022 at a rate of $40,682 for the year, a copy of which is attached and incorporated herein. Now, Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: The attached FY2022 28E Agreement for Transit Services between the City of Iowa City, Iowa and the City of University Heights, Iowa is hereby approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest in duplicate same on behalf of the City of Iowa City. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a copy of said Agreement with the Secretary of the State of Iowa, as required by Iowa Code Chapter 28E. Passed and approved this 18th day of May 2021. ATTEST: /— ll'zz' pproved by City Attorney's ffice - 05/11/2021 Resolution No. 21-132 Page 2 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Bergus % Mims % Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner the Resolution be FY2022 28E Agreement for Transit Services between the City of Iowa City, Iowa and the City of University Heights, Iowa This agreement is made and entered into this 18th day of May , 2021, by and between the City of Iowa City, Iowa and the City of University Heights, Iowa, both municipal corporations. Whereas, Chapter 28E of the Code of Iowa provides, in substance, that any power which may be exercised by a public agency of the state may be exercised jointly with another public agency having such power, and Whereas, it is in the mutual interest of the parties to encourage the use of public transit by residents of Iowa City and University Heights. Now, Therefore, it is hereby agreed by and between the City of Iowa City and the City of University Heights, as follows: /. Scope of Services No separate legal or administrative entity is created herein. The City of Iowa City shall provide public transit service to the City of University Heights. Iowa City shall determine the scheduling of buses, the routes, and the location of bus stops within University Heights. It is agreed that residents of University Heights will obtain the same level of transit service as residents of Iowa City who are served by the same routes. Residents of University Heights will also be eligible for the same fare structure as Iowa City residents. A Duration The term of this agreement shall commence July 1, 2021, and continue through and including June 30, 2022. ///. Termination This agreement may be terminated upon thirty calendar days written notice by either party. In the event of termination, Iowa City shall provide public transit service through the last day of the thirty -day notice period, and University Heights shall pay for all services rendered, including those rendered in the thirty -day period. /V. Compensation The City of University Heights agrees to pay $40,682 for the provision of public transit service as herein described during FY2022. Payment shall be made in twelve monthly payments of $3,390.16 each, to be received by the City of Iowa City on or before the 15th of each month. V. Chapter28E, Code of Iowa In accordance with Chapter 28E of the Code of Iowa, this agreement shall be filed with the Secretary of the State of Iowa and the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa. City of Iowa City By: &� kA-Q� Bruce Teague, Mayor Attest: City Clerk, Kellie ru hling Appr y: City Attorney's Office State of Iowa ) ss: Johnson County ) City of University Heights By: o ise From, Mayor Attest: 0"`� / IV_ a4� City Clerk, Christine Anderson On this 18th day of May 1 20 21 , before me, Christine Olney , a Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa, personally appeared Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling, to me personally known, and, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City, Iowa; that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that the instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of the corporation, by authority of its City Council, as contained in Resolution No. 21-132 passed by the City Council, on the 18th day of May 20 21 and that Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling acknowledged the execution of the instrument to be their voluntary act and deed and the voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by it voluntarily executed. 00. CHRISTINE OLNEY �� Commission Number 806232 z � * My Commission Expires l� Notary Public in and f he State of Iowa State of Iowa ) ss: Johnson County ) On this 14th day of April, 2021, before me, Steven E. Ballard, a Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa, personally appeared Louise From and Christine Anderson, to me personally known, and, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of University Heights, Iowa; that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that the instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of the corporation, by authority of its City Council, as contained in (Resolution) No. 21-17, passed by the City Council, on the 13th day of April, 2021, and that Louise From and Christine Anderson, acknowledged the execution of the instrument to be their voluntary act and deed and the voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by it voluntarily a cuted. STEVEN E. BALLARD Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Commission Number 161385 Myy Cofr��fr�1l�rssig(1 �pares owe A. J11 ^101 / Item Number: 7.i. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution adopting a policy for use of public right-of-way and City Plaza for sidewalk cafes and rescinding Resolution No. 20-30. Prepared By: Susan Dulek, Interim City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: No Impact Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Redlined Policy Resolution Policy Executive Summary: This is an amendment to the sidewalk cafe policy to allow the City Manager to approve use of an elevated planter for a cafe in limited situations. The change will facilitate a planter cafe that will extend onto the sidewalk near Joseph's restaurant on Clinton Street. The change also clarifies that it is the commercial condo unit owner that must approve a tenant's cafe if the building is a condominium regime. Background /Analysis: ATTACHMENTS: Description recllinecl policy resolution policy SIDEWALK CAFE POLICY (adopted Res. No. 210 - In addition to the policy set forth below, sidewalk cafes are governed by Section 10-3-3 of the City Code, which is set forth below at the end of the policy. Location 1. Sidewalk cafes may be located in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). 2. In City Plaza (a/k/a, the ped mall), cafes may be located in either zone 1 or zone 2 if in conjunction with zone 1. Zone 1 is the area within ten feet (10') of the buildings. Zone 3 is the emergency/service lane through the middle of City Plaza. Zone 2 is the remaining area. For the specific definitions of the zones in City Plaza, see Section 10-5-1 of the City Code. Easement Agreement The agreement shall be between the City and the cafe owner with the approval of the build+r9 ewaerowner of the retail space where the restaurant is located, if different than the cafe owner. 2. The agreement shall provide that no property right is conferred and that it may be terminated if the City determines that the right of way is needed. 3. The agreement shall include provisions for insurance, indemnification, fencing, maintenance, including vegetation and the subsurface if applicable, and any other reasonable provision as determined by the City Manager, or designee. 4. The agreement shall include a stamped professional drawn schematic diagram that shows that the cafe, and platform if applicable, comply with this policy and the City Code. Except for cafes on City Plaza, the design shall include all existing streetscape amenities and utility features (such as valves and manholes) within eight feet (8') of the proposed cafe. 5. Except for cafes located on the street, the agreement shall be issued from February 1 through January 31. The initial agreement may be less than the one year, but shall expire on January 31. 6. The agreement shall be recorded at the cafe owner's expense. Operation of Sidewalk Cafes 1. Advertising shall not be permitted in the sidewalk cafe area except for the name of the establishment on chairs, tables, umbrellas or other amenities, as approved by the City. 2. No blockage of building entrances or exits is permitted in a sidewalk cafe area. 3. Additional restroom capacity may be required to comply with local building and housing codes. 4. Occupancy limits are determined as set forth in the City building code. 5. No additional parking is required for the operation of a sidewalk cafe. 6. Sidewalk cafes are subject to annual inspections and may be inspected at any other time at the City's discretion. 7. The sidewalk cafe owner is responsible for trash removal and shall maintain the area and surrounding six feet (6') in a clean and litter free manner during all hours of operation. 8. All sidewalk cafes must meet the accessibility standards of City, State, and federal law. 9. All outdoor heating units must be approved by the Fire Department. Usable Sidewalk Cafe Area In the CB -10 zone with the exception of City Plaza, a sidewalk cafe area may not extend onto the sidewalk in a manner that will not allow a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway on the side of the cafe that is parallel to the building. The eight -foot (8) unobstructed walkway does not apply to cafes located on the street. Cafes located on Washington Street, between Clinton Street and Linn Street, must be detached from the building face and there must be a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway between the building face and the side of the cafe. 2. In City Plaza, there must be a minimum of six feet (6') of unobstructed walkway between the side of the cafe and an elevated planter if the cafe abuts the building. If the cafe does not abut the building, the cafe may abut a planter if there is a minimum of six feet (6) of unobstructed walkway between the cafe and the building face and six feet (6) of walkway along any other side of the cafe opposite of the planter. 3. In the CB -2 and CB -5 zones, the minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed sidewalk is not required if the existing sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width. If the sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width, a sidewalk cafe may not extend into or encompass in any manner the existing sidewalk and may not impede pedestrian traffic. 4. A sidewalk cafe area may not be located in the street corner area defined by building line extended to the street and no closer than ten feet (10') from an alley. However, a cafe may be located between two feet (2') and ten feet (10') from an alley if the fencing located within ten feet (10') is a type that is less than twenty percent (20%) solid. 5. A sidewalk cafe may not extend beyond the building line extended, except for those in a planter. 6. A sidewalk cafe serving alcohol shall be contiguous with a side of the building wherein the establishment is located. The contiguous requirement may be satisfied by a five foot (5) wide pathway connecting the building to the cafe. The pathway area shall be under the control of the establishment and is subject to the annual fee. 7. A cafe on the sidewalk that does not abut the building must be located a minimum of two feet (2') from the curb as measured by the City, except for unique circumstances (such as being adjacent to a street cafe) as determined solely by the City Manager or designee. Public Amenities and Utilities 1. Except as provided herein, a sidewalk cafe shall not utilize or encompass any public amenities, including, but not limited to, benches, seats, tables, trash receptacles, public art, bike racks, water spigots, kiosks, posting pillars, and pergolas. The City Manager or designee may approve the utilization, encompassing, or relocation of a public amenity on the condition that the cafe owner pay all associated costs. 2. A sidewalk cafe may encompass trees, tree rings, light poles, water valves, manholes, and stormwater intakes but shall not interfere with their care, maintenance or operation. Access shall be available to the City for their care and maintenance. 3. Amenities, including trees, tree rings and light poles, shall be considered obstructions for purposes of the requirements of the eight foot (8') unobstructed walkway. 4. The amenities used in the sidewalk cafe area shall be maintained in good condition. 2 5. Upon payment of the electricity fee, the cafe owner may use the City's electrical outlet but only for lights. Fencing (For Cafes Not on the Street) Except during the term of the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28 thereafter and except as provided herein for cafes located on City Plaza and on Washington St., the area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. During the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28, said area may be delineated by ropes or some other suitable method which shall be detectable by pedestrians who are visually impaired. 2. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 3. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the approved fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable and shall not block or obstruct emergency exits. If ropes or some other suitable method is used, tables, chairs and other items shall be removed at the end of the day's operation, and the sidewalk cafe area shall be restored to its normal condition as a pedestrian way. 4. The cafe owner shall be responsible for any damages to the public right of way caused by the placement of any anchored fencing. 5. Planters with flowers and/or other vegetation are allowed as an alternative to temporary and fencing to delineate the sidewalk cafe. The design of the planters shall be approved by the City Manager, or designee, subject to the following limitations: a. The planters shall, at the cafe owner's option, be either fastened to each other or removed from the sidewalk or City Plaza at the end of the day's operation along with the tables, chairs, and other items. b. The planters shall not be less than twenty-seven inches (27") or more than thirty-six inches (36") in height excluding plantings. c. The planters shall be either metal or have a metal frame. 6. Anchored fencing on a concrete platform or within a planter may remain year around. 7. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, anchored fencing is prohibited in City Plaza and on Washington Street, from Clinton Street to Linn Street. All fencing in those locations must be approved by the City Manager, or designee. All 4 (four) sides of the approved fence must be connected to one another to prevent movement of the fencing and said connection must be approved by the City Engineer or designee. Platforms (For Cafes Not on the Street) 1. Sidewalk cafes may be located on a platform on top of a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee determines there is excessive slope in the sidewalk and approves the design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. 4-.2. With the approval of the City Manager or designee, a sidewalk cafe located within an elevated Planter may extend beyond the parameters of the planter if the extension of the cafe is on a platform that is less than 25% of the planter area. All other requirements stated in this policy, such as clear walkways, must be met, however, the excessive slope requirement stated in Platforms (For Cafes Not on the Street) - Paragraph 1 would be waived. This platform may remain year around. 3 2L.3. Sidewalk cafes may be located on a concrete platform in the right of way that is not a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee approves the concrete design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. Fencing shall not be more than three feet (3') in height, measured from the plane on which the chair sits to the top of the railing, excluding finials. Planters A sidewalk cafe may encompass or utilize an elevated planter if the proposed cafe meets the following criteria, as determined solely by the City: a. It does not interfere with pedestrian movement. b. It does not adversely affect drainage. c. It does not adversely affect public or city utilities. d. It does not adversely affect trees, shrubs or other plantings. e. It enhances the appearance of the surrounding area, and if in City Plaza, it enhances the use of City Plaza. f. It does not interfere with the functionality of any other existing sidewalk cafe. g. It is not otherwise contrary to public interest. 2. If utilizing two planters, the area between the planters shall be included in the sidewalk cafe area but need not be delineated as such unless tables and chairs are present. 3. With the consent of the adjacent property owner and first floor tenants, if any, the cafe may extend beyond the building line extended if the distance between the planter and the building line extended is less than ten feet (10'). The cafe may extend beyond additional building lines extended with the consent of those property owners and first floor tenants, if any. 4. The cafe owner shall pay all costs associated with the cate including, but not limited to, the cost to move water mains and water service lines, to remove and plant vegetation, to move electrical outlets, and to cut and restore the limestone. 5. The City may require the cafe owner to add plantings within the cafe area at the cafe owner's cost. 5-.6. If a ramp is required in order to provide ADA accessibility to a cafe located within a planter, and it is determined by the City Manager or designee that ADA accessibility cannot be obtained by incorporating the ramp within the planter area, an accessibility ramp may be placed outside of the planter area in a manner approved by the City Manager or designee. &.7. There are a limited number of planters, and cafes in planters will entail a substantial financial investment. In order to address these two opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe in the planter for the following two cafe seasons assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in planters. Cafe owners need to obtain the consent of adjacent property owner(s) and first floor tenant(s) only before entering the easement agreement for the first of the three-year, priority period. The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. The lottery for planters will be conducted in the same manner as the lottery for cafes in the street. Cafes on the Street An establishment cannot operate a cafe in the street if there is sufficient room on the sidewalk for a cafe with an area of at least one -hundred twenty square feet (120 sq. ft.). 4 2. There shall be a minimum four feet (4') buffer on either end of the cafe for safety reasons. These buffers shall be established and maintained by the City and may be used for moped parking and/or bicycle parking. The buffer is subject to the annual fee. As used in this policy, the term sidewalk cafe area does not include the 4 -foot buffer. 3. The sidewalk cafe area may not include the portion of the parking space beyond the building line extended. The 4 -foot buffer may be located beyond the building line extended. 4. Cafes, including the 4 -foot buffer, in each block face cannot utilize more than thirty percent (30%) of the total parking spaces in that block face. 5. Cafes cannot be located in loading zones. 6. Cafes cannot be set up before April 1 and shall be removed no later than the Tuesday following the last University of Iowa home football game. Cafes may have to be removed temporarily at the cafe owner's sole expense to accommodate an event on the street permitted by the City (e.g., criterium). 7. The portion of the cafe located on the street shall be on a platform. The design features of the platform shall be submitted with the application and the design shall be stamped by a professional engineer or architect. The platform shall not impede drainage in the street gutter. 8. The area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 9. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the anchored fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable. 10. The fee shall be a combination of the following four (4) fees: a) the annual square footage "right of way" fee for the portion of the cafe located on the sidewalk and the area satisfying the contiguous requirement; b) the annual square footage "platform" fee for portion of the cafe located on the street and any portion that is be located on the sidewalk; c) the daily fee for each parking space regardless of the amount of the parking space that the cafe utilizes; and d) bollard fee. 11. There is no guarantee that the City will continue to authorize cafes in the street. The cafe agreement will include a paragraph in substantial compliance with the following: Cafe owner further acknowledges and agrees that no property right is conferred by this agreement for the use of portions of the public right-of-way, that the City is not empowered to grant permanent or perpetual use of its right-of-way for private purposes, that the City may order said locations and/or uses within the right-of-way to cease and desist if, for any reason, the City determines that said right-of-way is needed for a public use and should be cleared of any and all obstructions, and that the cafe owner shall not be entitled to any compensation should the City elect to do so. The "30% limitation" limits the number of establishments that will be allowed to operate a cafe on the street, and cafes on the street will entail a substantial financial investment. To address these opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. The City will provide information on the lottery and the priority system on its website. Lottery. The logistics and deadlines for the lottery are as follows: • February 1. In order to be eligible for the lottery, an application with a preliminary (does not have to be drawn by a professional) schematic diagram must be submitted by this date. Applications received after February 1St will be considered on a first come, first serve basis and will be denied if there is no available space. • February 15. If there are competing applications, staff will notify the applicants by this date whether they have been selected to enter into easement agreements. Competing applications mean when there are applications for more than 30% of the parking spaces within a block face. The City will conduct a lottery to select applicants. • March 15. The applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date, which is dependent upon staff approval of its schematic diagram (drawn by a professional) and payment of all fees (except the parking space fee that will not be known until the platform is installed). If an applicant does not meet the March 15 deadline, staff will notify the next applicant that it is eligible for a cafe on the street. • April 15. The next applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date. Note: If one of these dates falls on a weekend, the applicable deadline will be the following Monday. Priority. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe within the same block face for the following two calendar years, assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in the street (see Paragraph 12 above). The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. Fees 1. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located directly on the public right-of-way: $5.00 per square foot. 2. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located on a structure/platform (including concrete platform) placed on the public right-of-way: $10.00 per square foot. 3. Annual fee for the area of the sidewalk cafe utilizing an elevated planter on the public right- of-way: $10.00 per square foot. The annual fee for the portion of a "planter" sidewalk cafe that is not located on the elevated planter: $5.00 per square foot. 4. Annual fee for a sidewalk cafe located on the street: $5.00 per square foot for the area located on the sidewalk plus $10.00 square foot for the area located on the platform on the street plus daily fee for each parking space as set forth in the City Code (presently, $20.00 per day) for every day the platform is on the street plus bollard fee. 5. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place anchored fencing in the public right-of-way: $200.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the right-of-way, and planter if applicable, is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 6. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place a structure/platform on the public right-of-way, regardless of whether anchored fencing is used: $500.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the structure/platform is removed, and the right -of way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 7. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which utilize an elevated planter or placement of a concrete platform in the public right-of-way: $1,000.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the platform or concrete is removed, and the right-of-way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 8. If the initial easement agreement is for less than one season, the fees listed in Paragraphs 1-4 above shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. 9. Electricity fee for using electrical outlet for lights for cafes in planters: $45 per year. 6 10. Bollard Fee: Actual cost of the bollards based on a five (5) year life cycle plus one (1) hour labor at the MWII pay grade to install, maintain, and remove the 4 -foot buffer. If the platform is removed temporarily during the year, the labor fee is assessed again when the platform is reinstalled. A minimum of two (2) bollards will be required, and the City shall determine if additional bollards are needed. 11. Recording fee for the easement agreement: Actual fee charged by County Recorder. City Manager The City Manager is authorized to approve any other provision or require any other restriction regarding the use of the public right of way by a sidewalk cafe that is not inconsistent with this policy or the City Code. Section 10-3-3 of the City Code A. Sidewalk cafes are permitted in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). B. No person shall operate a sidewalk cafe without executing an easement agreement. C. Each sidewalk cafe applicant shall file an application for an easement agreement with the Public Works Department, on forms provided by the City. D. The City Manager, or designee, shall either grant or deny the application within thirty (30) days of the application being filed. If the application is granted, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to enter into a public right of way easement agreement. If the application is denied, the applicant may appeal to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Council, and the appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. The City retains the right to limit the number of sidewalk cafes. E. After execution of an easement agreement, the City Manager, or designee, shall retain the right to terminate the easement agreement but only after written notice of violation has been given and the time to cure the violation has expired. Grounds for termination of the easement agreement shall include, but not be limited to, repeated violations of the state and liquor control laws, violations of the easement agreement, and creating a safety hazard, health hazard and/or public nuisance under state or local law. Additionally, the City Manager, or designee, retains the right to terminate the easement agreement and direct removal of sidewalk cafe operations if there is a substantial and reasonable need for use of the public right of way for a valid public purpose. The cafe owner has the right to appeal a decision to terminate the agreement to the City Council. The appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. F. The easement agreement, at a minimum, shall require the cafe operator to provide a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City, and shall agree to hold the City harmless against any and all liability arising from or relating to the operation of the sidewalk cafe or the location of the cafe on the public right of way including, but not limited to, all claims arising from occurrences or accidents within the sidewalk cafe area, including the walkway through a cafe. G. Sidewalk cafes shall operate only between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight. H. Food and beverages must be available for service to patrons in a sidewalk cafe during all hours of operation. Sidewalk cafes shall not operate when the restaurant kitchen is closed. I. A sidewalk cafe serving alcoholic beverages shall have an employee monitoring the area at all times during the hours alcohol is consumed and shall dispense any alcoholic beverage under state and local law J. Amplified sound equipment shall not be permitted. K. The operation of any sidewalk cafe shall be in conformity with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. M. All fees for the operation of a sidewalk cafe shall be set by resolution. N. The City Manager is authorized to establish administrative rules not inconsistent with any ordinance or policy adopted by the City Council. A copy of the policy and rules shall be on file with the City Clerk and available of the City website. 8 Late Handouts Distributed (Date) 01+C�lii 2-SIEWS: CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org City Council Agenda - May 18, 2021 - Regular Formal Meeting Information submitted between distribution of late additions/late handouts on Monday and one hour prior to the meeting start on Tuesday. Late Handout(s): Consent Calendar Item 7.i. Sidewalk Caf6 Policy - See highlighted revision in the Policy. SIDEWALK CAFE POLICY (adopted Res. No. 210-_) In addition to the policy set forth below, sidewalk cafes are governed by Section 10-3-3 of the City Code, which is set forth below at the end of the policy. Location 1. Sidewalk cafes may be located in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). 2. In City Plaza (a/k/a, the ped mall), cafes may be located in either zone 1 or zone 2 if in conjunction with zone 1. Zone 1 is the area within ten feet (10') of the buildings. Zone 3 is the emergency/service lane through the middle of City Plaza. Zone 2 is the remaining area. For the specific definitions of the zones in City Plaza, see Section 10-5-1 of the City Code. Easement Agreement The agreement shall be between the City and the cafe owner with the approval of the buildiag ewnerowner of the retail space where the restaurant is located, if different than the cafe owner. 2. The agreement shall provide that no property right is conferred and that it may be terminated if the City determines that the right of way is needed. 3. The agreement shall include provisions for insurance, indemnification, fencing, maintenance, including vegetation and the subsurface if applicable, and any other reasonable provision as determined by the City Manager, or designee. 4. The agreement shall include a stamped professional drawn schematic diagram that shows that the cafe, and platform if applicable, comply with this policy and the City Code. Except for cafes on City Plaza, the design shall include all existing streetscape amenities and utility features (such as valves and manholes) within eight feet (8') of the proposed cafe. 5. Except for cafes located on the street, the agreement shall be issued from February 1 through January 31. The initial agreement may be less than the one year, but shall expire on January 31. The agreement shall be recorded at the cafe owner's expense. Operation of Sidewalk Cafes 1. Advertising shall not be permitted in the sidewalk cafe area except for the name of the establishment on chairs, tables, umbrellas or other amenities, as approved by the City. 2. No blockage of building entrances or exits is permitted in a sidewalk cafe area. 3. Additional restroom capacity may be required to comply with local building and housing codes. 4. Occupancy limits are determined as set forth in the City building code. 5. No additional parking is required for the operation of a sidewalk cafe. 6. Sidewalk cafes are subject to annual inspections and may be inspected at any other time at the City's discretion. 7. The sidewalk cafe owner is responsible for trash removal and shall maintain the area and surrounding six feet (6) in a clean and litter free manner during all hours of operation. 8. All sidewalk cafes must meet the accessibility standards of City, State, and federal law 9. All outdoor heating units must be approved by the Fire Department. Usable Sidewalk Cafe Area 1.. In the CB -10 zone with the exception of City Plaza, a sidewalk cafe area may not extend onto the sidewalk in a manner that will not allow a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway on the side of the cafe that is parallel to the building. The eight -foot (8') unobstructed walkway does not apply to cafes located on the street. Cafes located on Washington Street, between Clinton Street and Linn Street, must be detached from the building face and there must be a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway between the building face and the side of the cafe. 2. In City Plaza, there must be a minimum of six feet (6') of unobstructed walkway between the side of the cafe and an elevated planter if the cafe abuts the building. If the cafe does not abut the building, the cafe may abut a planter if there is a minimum of six feet (6) of unobstructed walkway between the cafe and the building face and six feet (6) of walkway along any other side of the cafe opposite of the planter. 3. In the CB -2 and CB -5 zones, the minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed sidewalk is not required if the existing sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width. If the sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width, a sidewalk cafe may not extend into or encompass in any manner the existing sidewalk and may not impede pedestrian traffic. 4. A sidewalk cafe area may not be located in the street corner area defined by building line extended to the street and no closer than ten feet (10') from an alley. However, a cafe may be located between two feet (2') and ten feet (10') from an alley if the fencing located within ten feet (10') is a type that is less than twenty percent (20%) solid. 5. A sidewalk cafe may not extend beyond the building line extended, except for those in a planter. 6. A sidewalk cafe serving alcohol shall be contiguous with a side of the building wherein the establishment is located. The contiguous requirement may be satisfied by a five foot (5) wide pathway connecting the building to the cafe. The pathway area shall be under the control of the establishment and is subject to the annual fee. 7. A cafe on the sidewalk that does not abut the building must be located a minimum of two feet (2') from the curb as measured by the City, except for unique circumstances (such as being adjacent to a street cafe) as determined solely by the City Manager or designee. Public Amenities and Utilities 1. Except as provided herein, a sidewalk cafe shall not utilize or encompass any public amenities, including, but not limited to, benches, seats, tables, trash receptacles, public art, bike racks, water spigots, kiosks, posting pillars, and pergolas. The City Manager or designee may approve the utilization, encompassing, or relocation of a public amenity on the condition that the cafe owner pay all associated costs. 2. A sidewalk cafe may encompass trees, tree rings, light poles, water valves, manholes, and stormwater intakes but shall not interfere with their care, maintenance or operation. Access shall be available to the City for their care and maintenance. 3. Amenities, including trees, tree rings and light poles, shall be considered obstructions for purposes of the requirements of the eight foot (8') unobstructed walkway. 4. The amenities used in the sidewalk cafe area shall be maintained in good condition. 5. Upon payment of the electricity fee, the cafe owner may use the City's electrical outlet but only for lights. Fencing (For Cafes Not on the Street) 1. Except during the term of the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28 thereafter and except as provided herein for cafes located on City Plaza and on Washington St., the area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. During the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28, said area may be delineated by ropes or some other suitable method which shall be detectable by pedestrians who are visually impaired. 2. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 3. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the approved fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable and shall not block or obstruct emergency exits. If ropes or some other suitable method is used, tables, chairs and other items shall be removed at the end of the day's operation, and the sidewalk cafe area shall be restored to its normal condition as a pedestrian way. 4. The cafe owner shall be responsible for any damages to the public right of way caused by the placement of any anchored fencing. 5. Planters with flowers and/or other vegetation are allowed as an alternative to temporary and fencing to delineate the sidewalk cafe. The design of the planters shall be approved by the City Manager, or designee, subject to the following limitations: a. The planters shall, at the cafe owner's option, be either fastened to each other or removed from the sidewalk or City Plaza at the end of the day's operation along with the tables, chairs, and other items. b. The planters shall not be less than twenty-seven inches (27") or more than thirty-six inches (36") in height excluding plantings. c. The planters shall be either metal or have a metal frame. 6. Anchored fencing on a concrete platform or within a planter may remain year around. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, anchored fencing is prohibited in City Plaza and on Washington Street, from Clinton Street to Linn Street. All fencing in those locations must be approved by the City Manager, or designee. All 4 (four) sides of the approved fence must be connected to one another to prevent movement of the fencing and said connection must be approved by the City Engineer or designee. Platforms (For Cafes Not on the Street) 1_Sidewalk cafes may be located on a platform on top of a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee determines there is excessive slope in the sidewalk and approves the design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. 4-2 With the approval of the City Manager or designee a sidewalk cafe located within an elevated policy, such as clear walkways must be met however, the excessive slope requirement stated in Platforms (For Cafes Not on the Street) - Paragraph 1 would be waived. This platform may remain year around. 2-.3. Sidewalk cafes may be located on a concrete platform in the right of way that is not a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee approves the concrete design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. Fencing shall not be more than three feet (3') in height, measured from the plane on which the chair sits to the top of the railing, excluding finials. Planters 1. A sidewalk cafe may encompass or utilize an elevated planter if the proposed cafe meets the following criteria, as determined solely by the City: a. It does not interfere with pedestrian movement. b. It does not adversely affect drainage. c. It does not adversely affect public or city utilities. d. It does not adversely affect trees, shrubs or other plantings. e. It enhances the appearance of the surrounding area, and if in City Plaza, it enhances the use of City Plaza. f. It does not interfere with the functionality of any other existing sidewalk cafe. g. It is not otherwise contrary to public interest. 2. If utilizing two planters, the area between the planters shall be included in the sidewalk cafe area but need not be delineated as such unless tables and chairs are present. 3. With the consent of the adjacent property owner and first floor tenants, if any, the cafe may extend beyond the building line extended if the distance between the planter and the building line extended is less than ten feet (10'). The cafe may extend beyond additional building lines extended with the consent of those property owners and first floor tenants, if any. 4. The cafe owner shall pay all costs associated with the cafe including, but not limited to, the cost to move water mains and water service lines, to remove and plant vegetation, to move electrical outlets, and to cut and restore the limestone. 5_The City may require the cafe owner to add plantings within the cafe area at the cafe owner's cost. 6 If a ramp is required in order to provide ADA accessibility to a cafe located within a planter, and it is determined by the City Manager or designee that ADA accessibility cannot be 6J. There are a limited number of planters, and cafes in planters will entail a substantial financial investment. In order to address these two opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe in the planter for the following two cafe seasons assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in planters. Cafe owners need to obtain the consent of adjacent property owner(s) and first floor tenant(s) only before entering the easement agreement for the first of the three-year, priority period. The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. The lottery for planters will be conducted in the same manner as the lottery for cafes in the street. Cafes on the Street An establishment cannot operate a cafe in the street if there is sufficient room on the sidewalk for a cafe with an area of at least one -hundred twenty square feet (120 sq. ft.). 2. There shall be a minimum four feet (4') buffer on either end of the cafe for safety reasons. These buffers shall be established and maintained by the City and may be used for moped parking and/or bicycle parking. The buffer is subject to the annual fee. As used in this policy, the term sidewalk cafe area does not include the 4 -foot buffer. 3. The sidewalk cafe area may not include the portion of the parking space beyond the building line extended. The 4 -foot buffer may be located beyond the building line extended. 4. Cafes, including the 4 -foot buffer, in each block face cannot utilize more than thirty percent (30%) of the total parking spaces in that block face. 5. Cafes cannot be located in loading zones. 6. Cafes cannot be set up before April 1 and shall be removed no later than the Tuesday following the last University of Iowa home football game. Cafes may have to be removed temporarily at the cafe owner's sole expense to accommodate an event on the street permitted by the City (e.g., criterium). The portion of the cafe located on the street shall be on a platform. The design features of the platform shall be submitted with the application and the design shall be stamped by a professional engineer or architect. The platform shall not impede drainage in the street gutter. The area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 9. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the anchored fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable. 10. The fee shall be a combination of the following four (4) fees: a) the annual square footage "right of way" fee for the portion of the cafe located on the sidewalk and the area satisfying the contiguous requirement; b) the annual square footage "platform" fee for portion of the cafe located on the street and any portion that is be located on the sidewalk; c) the daily fee for each parking space regardless of the amount of the parking space that the cafe utilizes; and d) bollard fee. 11. There is no guarantee that the City will continue to authorize cafes in the street. The cafe agreement will include a paragraph in substantial compliance with the following: Cafe owner further acknowledges and agrees that no property right is conferred by this agreement for the use of portions of the public right-of-way, that the City is not empowered to grant permanent or perpetual use of its right-of-way for private purposes, that the City may order said locations and/or uses within the right-of-way to cease and desist if, for any reason, the City determines that said right-of-way is needed for a public use and should be cleared of any and all obstructions, and that the cafe owner shall not be entitled to any compensation should the City elect to do so. The "30% limitation" limits the number of establishments that will be allowed to operate a cafe on the street, and cafes on the street will entail a substantial financial investment. To address these opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. The City will provide information on the lottery and the priority system on its website. Lottery. The logistics and deadlines for the lottery are as follows: • February 1. In order to be eligible for the lottery, an application with a preliminary (does not have to be drawn by a professional) schematic diagram must be submitted by this date. Applications received after February 1S1 will be considered on a first come, first serve basis and will be denied if there is no available space. • February 15. If there are competing applications, staff will notify the applicants by this date whether they have been selected to enter into easement agreements. Competing applications mean when there are applications for more than 30% of the parking spaces within a block face. The City will conduct a lottery to select applicants. • March 15. The applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date, which is dependent upon staff approval of its schematic diagram (drawn by a professional) and payment of all fees (except the parking space fee that will not be known until the platform is installed). If an applicant does not meet the March 15 deadline, staff will notify the next applicant that it is eligible for a cafe on the street. • April 15. The next applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date. Note: If one of these dates falls on a weekend, the applicable deadline will be the following Monday. Priority. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe within the same block face for the following two calendar years, assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in the street (see Paragraph 12 above). The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. Fees 1. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located directly on the public right-of-way: $5.00 per square foot. 2. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located on a structure/platform (including concrete platform) placed on the public right-of-way: $10.00 per square foot. 3. Annual fee for the area of the sidewalk cafe utilizing an elevated planter on the public right- of-way: $10.00 per square foot. The annual fee for the portion of a "planter" sidewalk cafe that is not located on the elevated planter: $5.00 per square foot. 4. Annual fee for a sidewalk cafe located on the street: $5.00 per square foot for the area located on the sidewalk plus $10.00 square foot for the area located on the platform on the street plus daily fee for each parking space as set forth in the City Code (presently, $20.00 per day) for every day the platform is on the street plus bollard fee. 5. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place anchored fencing in the public right-of-way: $200.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the right-of-way, and planter if applicable, is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 6. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place a structure/platform on the public right-of-way, regardless of whether anchored fencing is used: $500.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the structure/platform is removed, and the right -of way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 7. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which utilize an elevated planter or placement of a concrete platform in the public right-of-way: $1,000.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the platform or concrete is removed, and the right-of-way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 8. If the initial easement agreement is for less than one season, the fees listed in Paragraphs 1-4 above shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. 9. Electricity fee for using electrical outlet for lights for cafes in planters: $45 per year. 6 10. Bollard Fee: Actual cost of the bollards based on a five (5) year life cycle plus one (1) hour labor at the MW II pay grade to install, maintain, and remove the 4 -foot buffer. If the platform is removed temporarily during the year, the labor fee is assessed again when the platform is reinstalled. A minimum of two (2) bollards will be required, and the City shall determine if additional bollards are needed. 11. Recording fee for the easement agreement: Actual fee charged by County Recorder. City Manager The City Manager is authorized to approve any other provision or require any other restriction regarding the use of the public right of way by a sidewalk cafe that is not inconsistent with this policy or the City Code. 7 Section 10-3-3 of the City Code A. Sidewalk cafes are permitted in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). B. No person shall operate a sidewalk cafe without executing an easement agreement. C. Each sidewalk cafe applicant shall file an application for an easement agreement with the Public Works Department, on forms provided by the City. D. The City Manager, or designee, shall either grant or deny the application within thirty (30) days of the application being filed. If the application is granted, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to enter into a public right of way easement agreement. If the application is denied, the applicant may appeal to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Council, and the appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. The City retains the right to limit the number of sidewalk cafes. E. After execution of an easement agreement, the City Manager, or designee, shall retain the right to terminate the easement agreement but only after written notice of violation has been given and the time to cure the violation has expired. Grounds for termination of the easement agreement shall include, but not be limited to, repeated violations of the state and liquor control laws, violations of the easement agreement, and creating a safety hazard, health hazard and/or public nuisance under state or local law. Additionally, the City Manager, or designee, retains the right to terminate the easement agreement and direct removal of sidewalk cafe operations if there is a substantial and reasonable need for use of the public right of way for a valid public purpose. The cafe owner has the right to appeal a decision to terminate the agreement to the City Council. The appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. F. The easement agreement, at a minimum, shall require the cafe operator to provide a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City, and shall agree to hold the City harmless against any and all liability arising from or relating to the operation of the sidewalk cafe or the location of the cafe on the public right of way including, but not limited to, all claims arising from occurrences or accidents within the sidewalk cafe area, including the walkway through a cafe. G. Sidewalk cafes shall operate only between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight. H. Food and beverages must be available for service to patrons in a sidewalk cafe during all hours of operation. Sidewalk cafes shall not operate when the restaurant kitchen is closed. I. A sidewalk cafe serving alcoholic beverages shall have an employee monitoring the area at all times during the hours alcohol is consumed and shall dispense any alcoholic beverage under state and local law J. Amplified sound equipment shall not be permitted. K. The operation of any sidewalk cafe shall be in conformity with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. M. All fees for the operation of a sidewalk cafe shall be set by resolution. N. The City Manager is authorized to establish administrative rules not inconsistent with any ordinance or policy adopted by the City Council. A copy of the policy and rules shall be on file with the City Clerk and available of the City website. Prepared by Susan Dulek, Asst. City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA (319)356-5030 RESOLUTION NO. 21-133 Resolution adopting a policy for use of public right-of-way and City Plaza for sidewalk cafes and rescinding Resolution No. 20-30. Whereas, sidewalk cafes are a use of the public right of way and City Plaza, a/k/a the ped mall, in the CB2, CBS, and CB10 zones; Whereas, in Resolution No. 20-30, City Council adopted a policy for sidewalk cafes; and Whereas, the City should adopt the revised policy which is attached to this resolution. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The attached "Sidewalk Cafe Policy" is adopted. 2. Resolution No. 20-30 is rescinded in its entirety. Passed and approved this 18th day of May 2021. Mi3ror Appr y: City Attorney's Office - 05/11/2021 11 Resolution No. Page 2 21-133 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: % Bergus % Mims x Salih x Taylor % Teague x Thomas x Weiner SIDEWALK CAFE POLICY (adopted Res. No. 21-133) In addition to the policy set forth below, sidewalk cafes are governed by Section 10-3-3 of the City Code, which is set forth below at the end of the policy. Location 1. Sidewalk cafes may be located in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). 2. In City Plaza (a/k/a, the ped mall), cafes may be located in either zone 1 or zone 2 if in conjunction with zone 1. Zone 1 is the area within ten feet (10') of the buildings. Zone 3 is the emergency/service lane through the middle of City Plaza. Zone 2 is the remaining area. For the specific definitions of the zones in City Plaza, see Section 10-5-1 of the City Code. Easement Agreement 1. The agreement shall be between the City and the cafe owner with the approval of the owner of the retail space where the restaurant is located, if different than the cafe owner. 2. The agreement shall provide that no property right is conferred and that it may be terminated if the City determines that the right of way is needed. 3. The agreement shall include provisions for insurance, indemnification, fencing, maintenance, including vegetation and the subsurface if applicable, and any other reasonable provision as determined by the City Manager, or designee. 4. The agreement shall include a stamped professional drawn schematic diagram that shows that the cafe, and platform if applicable, comply with this policy and the City Code. Except for cafes on City Plaza, the design shall include all existing streetscape amenities and utility features (such as valves and manholes) within eight feet (8') of the proposed cafe. 5. Except for cafes located on the street, the agreement shall be issued from February 1 through January 31. The initial agreement may be less than the one year, but shall expire on January 31. 6. The agreement shall be recorded at the cafe owner's expense. Operation of Sidewalk Cafes 1. Advertising shall not be permitted in the sidewalk cafe area except for the name of the establishment on chairs, tables, umbrellas or other amenities, as approved by the City. 2. No blockage of building entrances or exits is permitted in a sidewalk cafe area. 3. Additional restroom capacity may be required to comply with local building and housing codes. 4. Occupancy limits are determined as set forth in the City building code. 5. No additional parking is required for the operation of a sidewalk cafe. 6. Sidewalk cafes are subject to annual inspections and may be inspected at any other time at the City's discretion. 7. The sidewalk cafe owner is responsible for trash removal and shall maintain the area and surrounding six feet (6) in a clean and litter free manner during all hours of operation. 8. All sidewalk cafes must meet the accessibility standards of City, State, and federal law. 9. All outdoor heating units must be approved by the Fire Department. Usable Sidewalk Cafe Area In the CB -10 zone with the exception of City Plaza, a sidewalk cafe area may not extend onto the sidewalk in a manner that will not allow a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway on the side of the cafe that is parallel to the building. The eight -foot (8') unobstructed walkway does not apply to cafes located on the street. Cafes located on Washington Street, between Clinton Street and Linn Street, must be detached from the building face and there must be a minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed walkway between the building face and the side of the cafe. 2. In City Plaza, there must be a minimum of six feet (6) of unobstructed walkway between the side of the cafe and an elevated planter if the cafe abuts the building. If the cafe does not abut the building, the cafe may abut a planter if there is a minimum of six feet (6') of unobstructed walkway between the cafe and the building face and six feet (6) of walkway along any other side of the cafe opposite of the planter. 3. In the CB -2 and CB -5 zones, the minimum of eight feet (8') of unobstructed sidewalk is not required if the existing sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width. If the sidewalk is less than eight feet (8') in width, a sidewalk cafe may not extend into or encompass in any manner the existing sidewalk and may not impede pedestrian traffic. 4. A sidewalk cafe area may not be located in the street corner area defined by building line extended to the street and no closer than ten feet (10') from an alley. However, a cafe may be located between two feet (2') and ten feet (10') from an alley if the fencing located within ten feet (10') is a type that is less than twenty percent (20%) solid. 5. A sidewalk cafe may not extend beyond the building line extended, except for those in a planter. 6. A sidewalk cafe serving alcohol shall be contiguous with a side of the building wherein the establishment is located. The contiguous requirement may be satisfied by a five foot (5) wide pathway connecting the building to the cafe. The pathway area shall be under the control of the establishment and is subject to the annual fee. 7. A cafe on the sidewalk that does not abut the building must be located a minimum of two feet (2) from the curb as measured by the City, except for unique circumstances (such as being adjacent to a street cafe) as determined solely by the City Manager or designee. Public Amenities and Utilities 1. Except as provided herein, a sidewalk cafe shall not utilize or encompass any public amenities, including, but not limited to, benches, seats, tables, trash receptacles, public art, bike racks, water spigots, kiosks, posting pillars, and pergolas. The City Manager or designee may approve the utilization, encompassing, or relocation of a public amenity on the condition that the cafe owner pay all associated costs. 2. A sidewalk cafe may encompass trees, tree rings, light poles, water valves, manholes, and stormwater intakes but shall not interfere with their care, maintenance or operation. Access shall be available to the City for their care and maintenance. 3. Amenities, including trees, tree rings and light poles, shall be considered obstructions for purposes of the requirements of the eight foot (8') unobstructed walkway. 4. The amenities used in the sidewalk cafe area shall be maintained in good condition. 5. Upon payment of the electricity fee, the cafe owner may use the City's electrical outlet but only for lights. Fencing (For Cafes Not on the Street) 1. Except during the term of the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28 thereafter and except as provided herein for cafes located on City Plaza and on Washington St., the area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. During the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28, said area may be delineated by ropes or some other suitable method which shall be detectable by pedestrians who are visually impaired. 2. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 3. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the approved fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable and shall not block or obstruct emergency exits. If ropes or some other suitable method is used, tables, chairs and other items shall be removed at the end of the day's operation, and the sidewalk cafe area shall be restored to its normal condition as a pedestrian way. 4. The cafe owner shall be responsible for any damages to the public right of way caused by the placement of any anchored fencing. 5. Planters with flowers and/or other vegetation are allowed as an alternative to temporary and fencing to delineate the sidewalk cafe. The design of the planters shall be approved by the City Manager, or designee, subject to the following limitations: a. The planters shall, at the cafe owner's option, be eitherfastened to each other or removed from the sidewalk or City Plaza at the end of the day's operation along with the tables, chairs, and other items. b. The planters shall not be less than twenty-seven inches (27") or more than thirty-six inches (36") in height excluding plantings. c. The planters shall be either metal or have a metal frame. 6. Anchored fencing on a concrete platform or within a planter may remain year around. 7. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, anchored fencing is prohibited in City Plaza and on Washington Street, from Clinton Street to Linn Street. All fencing in those locations must be approved by the City Manager, or designee. All 4 (four) sides of the approved fence must be connected to one another to prevent movement of the fencing and said connection must be approved by the City Engineer or designee. Platforms (For Cafes Not on the Street) Sidewalk cafes may be located on a platform on top of a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee determines there is excessive slope in the sidewalk and approves the design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. 2. With the approval of the City Manager or designee, a sidewalk cafe located within an elevated planter may extend beyond the parameters of the planter if the extension of the cafe is not greater than the sidewalk cafe area within the planter. All other requirements stated in this policy, such as clear walkways, must be met, however, the excessive slope requirement stated in Platforms (For Cafes Not on the Street) - Paragraph 1 would be waived. This platform may remain year around. 3. Sidewalk cafes may be located on a concrete platform in the right of way that is not a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee approves the concrete design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. Fencing shall not be more than three feet (3') in height, measured from the plane on which the chair sits to the top of the railing, excluding finials. Planters A sidewalk cafe may encompass or utilize an elevated planter if the proposed cafe meets the following criteria, as determined solely by the City: a. It does not interfere with pedestrian movement. b. It does not adversely affect drainage. c. It does not adversely affect public or city utilities. d. It does not adversely affect trees, shrubs or other plantings. e. It enhances the appearance of the surrounding area, and if in City Plaza, it enhances the use of City Plaza. f. It does not interfere with the functionality of any other existing sidewalk cafe. g. It is not otherwise contrary to public interest. 2. If utilizing two planters, the area between the planters shall be included in the sidewalk cafe area but need not be delineated as such unless tables and chairs are present. 3. With the consent of the adjacent property owner and first floor tenants, if any, the cafe may extend beyond the building line extended if the distance between the planter and the building line extended is less than ten feet (10'). The cafe may extend beyond additional building lines extended with the consent of those property owners and first floor tenants, if any. 4. The cafe owner shall pay all costs associated with the cafe including, but not limited to, the cost to move water mains and water service lines, to remove and plant vegetation, to move electrical outlets, and to cut and restore the limestone. 5. The City may require the cafe owner to add plantings within the cafe area at the cafe owner's cost. 6. If a ramp is required in order to provide ADA accessibility to a cafe located within a planter, and it is determined by the City Manager or designee that ADA accessibility cannot be obtained by incorporating the ramp within the planter area, an accessibility ramp may be placed outside of the planter area in a manner approved by the City Manager or designee. 7. There are a limited number of planters, and cafes in planters will entail a substantial financial investment. In order to address these two opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe in the planter for the following two cafe seasons assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in planters. Cafe owners need to obtain the consent of adjacent property owner(s) and first floor tenant(s) only before entering the easement agreement for the first of the three-year, priority period. The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. The lottery for planters will be conducted in the same manner as the lottery for cafes in the street. Cafes on the Street An establishment cannot operate a cafe in the street if there is sufficient room on the sidewalk for a cafe with an area of at least one -hundred twenty square feet (120 sq. ft.). 2. There shall be a minimum four feet (4') buffer on either end of the cafe for safety reasons. These buffers shall be established and maintained by the City and may be used for moped parking and/or bicycle parking. The buffer is subject to the annual fee. As used in this policy, the term sidewalk cafe area does not include the 4 -foot buffer. 3. The sidewalk cafe area may not include the portion of the parking space beyond the building line extended. The 4 -foot buffer may be located beyond the building line extended. 4. Cafes, including the 4 -foot buffer, in each block face cannot utilize more than thirty percent (30%) of the total parking spaces in that block face. 5. Cafes cannot be located in loading zones. 6. Cafes cannot be set up before April 1 and shall be removed no later than the Tuesday following the last University of Iowa home football game. Cafes may have to be removed temporarily at the cafe owner's sole expense to accommodate an event on the street permitted by the City (e.g., criterium). 7. The portion of the cafe located on the street shall be on a platform. The design features of the platform shall be submitted with the application and the design shall be stamped by a professional engineer or architect. The platform shall not impede drainage in the street gutter. 8. The area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencing. Fencing shall be constructed of a durable material, such as steel, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall not be allowed. The City shall approve the design. 9. If stored outdoors, tables, chairs, and other items shall be secured within the anchored fencing at the end of each day's operation so that they are unusable. 10. The fee shall be a combination of the following four (4) fees: a) the annual square footage "right of way" fee for the portion of the cafe located on the sidewalk and the area satisfying the contiguous requirement; b) the annual square footage "platform" fee for portion of the cafe located on the street and any portion that is be located on the sidewalk; c) the daily fee for each parking space regardless of the amount of the parking space that the cafe utilizes; and d) bollard fee. 11. There is no guarantee that the City will continue to authorize cafes in the street. The cafe agreement will include a paragraph in substantial compliance with the following: Cafe owner further acknowledges and agrees that no property right is conferred by this agreement for the use of portions of the public right-of-way, that the City is not empowered to grant permanent or perpetual use of its right-of-way for private purposes, that the City may order said locations and/or uses within the right-of-way to cease and desist if, for any reason, the City determines that said right-of-way is needed for a public use and should be cleared of any and all obstructions, and that the cafe owner shall not be entitled to any compensation should the City elect to do so. The "30% limitation" limits the number of establishments that will be allowed to operate a cafe on the street, and cafes on the street will entail a substantial financial investment. To address these opposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery will be used. The City will provide information on the lottery and the priority system on its website. Lottery. The logistics and deadlines for the lottery are as follows: • February 1. In order to be eligible for the lottery, an application with a preliminary (does not have to be drawn by a professional) schematic diagram must be submitted by this date. Applications received after February 151 will be considered on a first come, first serve basis and will be denied if there is no available space. • February 15. If there are competing applications, staff will notify the applicants by this date whether they have been selected to enter into easement agreements. Competing applications mean when there are applications for more than 30% of the parking spaces within a block face. The City will conduct a lottery to select applicants. • March 15. The applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date, which is dependent upon staff approval of its schematic diagram (drawn by a professional) and payment of all fees (except the parking space fee that will not be known until the platform is installed). If an applicant does not meet the March 15 deadline, staff will notify the next applicant that it is eligible for a cafe on the street. • April 15. The next applicant must sign an easement agreement by this date. Note: If one of these dates falls on a weekend, the applicable deadline will be the following Monday. Priority. If a cafe owner enters into an easement agreement with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over subsequent applicants for a cafe within the same block face for the following two calendar years, assuming that the City continues to authorize cafes in the street (see Paragraph 12 above). The priority is to the individual business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to another cafe owner. Fees 1. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located directly on the public right-of-way: $5.00 per square foot. 2. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes located on a structure/platform (including concrete platform) placed on the public right-of-way: $10.00 per square foot. 3. Annual fee for the area of the sidewalk cafe utilizing an elevated planter on the public right- of-way: $10.00 per square foot. The annual fee for the portion of a "planter" sidewalk cafe that is not located on the elevated planter: $5.00 per square foot. 4. Annual fee for a sidewalk cafe located on the street: $5.00 per square foot for the area located on the sidewalk plus $10.00 square foot for the area located on the platform on the street plus daily fee for each parking space as set forth in the City Code (presently, $20.00 per day) for every day the platform is on the street.plus bollard fee. 5. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place anchored fencing in the public right-of-way: $200.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the right-of-way, and planter if applicable, is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 6. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which place a structure/platform on the public right-of-way, regardless of whether anchored fencing is used: $500.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the structure/platform is removed, and the right -of way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 7. Deposit for sidewalk cafes which utilize an elevated planter or placement of a concrete platform in the public right-of-way: $1,000.00. This deposit shall be refunded if the platform or concrete is removed, and the right-of-way is restored to its prior condition by the sidewalk cafe owner to the satisfaction of the City. 8. If the initial easement agreement is for less than one season, the fees listed in Paragraphs 1-4 above shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. 9. Electricity fee for using electrical outlet for lights for cafes in planters: $45 per year. 10. Bollard Fee: Actual cost of the bollards based on a five (5) year life cycle plus one (1) hour labor at the MWII pay grade to install, maintain, and remove the 4 -foot buffer. If the platform is removed temporarily during the year, the labor fee is assessed again when the platform is reinstalled. A minimum of two (2) bollards will be required, and the City shall determine if additional bollards are needed. 11. Recording fee for the easement agreement: Actual fee charged by County Recorder. City Manager The City Manager is authorized to approve any other provision or require any other restriction regarding the use of the public right of way by a sidewalk cafe that is not inconsistent with this policy or the City Code. Section 10-3-3 of the City Code A. Sidewalk cafes are permitted in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). B. No person shall operate a sidewalk cafe without executing an easement agreement. C. Each sidewalk cafe applicant shall file an application for an easement agreement with the Public Works Department, on forms provided by the City. D. The City Manager, or designee, shall either grant or deny the application within thirty (30) days of the application being filed. If the application is granted, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to enter into a public right of way easement agreement. If the application is denied, the applicant may appeal to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Council, and the appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. The City retains the right to limit the number of sidewalk cafes. E. After execution of an easement agreement, the City Manager, or designee, shall retain the right to terminate the easement agreement but only after written notice of violation has been given and the time to cure the violation has expired. Grounds for termination of the easement agreement shall include, but not be limited to, repeated violations of the state and liquor control laws, violations of the easement agreement, and creating a safety hazard, health hazard and/or public nuisance under state or local law. Additionally, the City Manager, or designee, retains the right to terminate the easement agreement and direct removal of sidewalk cafe operations if there is a substantial and reasonable need for use of the public right of way for a valid public purpose. The cafe owner has the right to appeal a decision to terminate the agreement to the City Council. The appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this chapter. F. The easement agreement, at a minimum, shall require the cafe operator to provide a certificate of insurance satisfactory to the City, and shall agree to hold the City harmless against any and all liability arising from or relating to the operation of the sidewalk cafe or the location of the cafe on the public right of way including, but not limited to, all claims arising from occurrences or accidents within the sidewalk cafe area, including the walkway through a cafe. G. Sidewalk cafes shall operate only between the hours of seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight. H. Food and beverages must be available for service to patrons in a sidewalk cafe during all hours of operation. Sidewalk cafes shall not operate when the restaurant kitchen is closed. I. A sidewalk cafe serving alcoholic beverages shall have an employee monitoring the area at all times during the hours alcohol is consumed and shall dispense any alcoholic beverage under state and local law J. Amplified sound equipment shall not be permitted. K. The operation of any sidewalk cafe shall be in conformity with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. M. All fees for the operation of a sidewalk cafe shall be set by resolution. N. The City Manager is authorized to establish administrative rules not inconsistent with any ordinance or policy adopted by the City Council. A copy of the policy and rules shall be on file with the City Clerk and available of the City website. -Vi SIDEWALK CAFE POLICY (adopted Res. No. 21-_) In addition to the po icy set forth below, sidewalk cafes are governed by Section 10-3-3 of the City Code, which is set f h below at the end of the policy. Location 1. Sidewalk cafes may lie located in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 zones (the downtown knd the commercial areas directly north and south of the downtown). 2. In City Plaza (a/k/a, the ed mall), cafes may be located in Oither zone 1 or zone 2 if in conjunction with zone 1.one 1 is the area within ten feet (19') of the buildings. Zone 3 is the emergency/service Ian through the middle of City Plaza. Zone 2 is the remaining area. For the specific definitions o he zones in City Plaza, see S ction 10-5-1 of the City Code. Easement Agreement 1. The agreement shall be between he City and the cafe wner with the approval of the owner of the retail space where the resta rant is located, if fferent than the cafe owner. 2. The agreement shall provide that no roperty right' conferred and that it may be terminated if the City determines that the right of ay is nee d. 3. The agreement shall include provisions or ins rance, indemnification, fencing, maintenance, including vegetation and the subsurface ' a licable, and any other reasonable provision as determined by the City Manager, or desi ea. 4. The agreement shall include a stampe pr fessional drawn schematic diagram that shows that the cafe, and platform if applicab , corn ly with this policy and the City Code. Except for cafes on City Plaza, the design all inclu all existing streetscape amenities and utility features (such as valves and man oles) within 'ght feet (8') of the proposed cafe. 5. Except for cafes located on the reet, the agreem t shall be issued from February 1 through January 31. The initial agree nt may be less than a one year, but shall expire on January 31. 6. The agreement shall be r orded at the cafe owner's a ense. Operation of Sidewalk Ca es 1. Advertising shall n be permitted in the sidewalk cafe are except for the name of the establishment on airs, tables, umbrellas or other amenities, a approved by the City. 2. No blockage of ilding entrances or exits is permitted in a sidewa cafe area. 3. Additional res oom capacity may be required to comply with loca building and housing codes. 4. Occupan limits are determined asset forth in the City building code. 5. No ado tional parking is required for the operation of a sidewalk cafe. 6. Sidewalk cafes are subject to annual inspections and may be inspected at any ther time at the City's discretion. 7. The sidewalk cafe owner is responsible for trash removal and shall maintain the ea and surrounding six feet (6') in a clean and litter free manner during all hours of operation. 8. All sidewalk cafes must meet the accessibility standards of City, State, and federal law. 1 9. All outdoor heating units must be approved by the Fire Department. Usable Sidewalk Cafe Area In the CB -10 zone with the exception of City Plaza, a sidewalk cafe area may not ext a onto the sidewalk in a manner that will not allow a minimum of eight feet (8') of un structed walkway on the side of the cafe that is parallel to the building. The eight -foot (8') obstructed 4 walkw does not apply to cafes located on the street. Cafes located on W ington Street, between linton Street and Linn Street, must be detached from the buil ' g face and there must be a inimum of eight feet (8) of unobstructed walkway betwee a building face and the side of the cafe. 2. In City Plaza, t re must be a minimum of six feet (6') of unobstr cted walkway between the side of the cafe\aynot n elevated planter if the cafe abuts the uilding. If the cafe does not abut the buildincafe may abut a planter if there i a minimum of six feet (6') of unobstructed wabetween the cafe and the buildin ace and six feet (6') of walkway along any other the cafe opposite of the planter. 3. In the CB -2 and z as, the minimum of eight et (8') of unobstructed sidewalk is not required if the esi walk is less than eight eet (8') in width. If the sidewalk is less than eight feet (8idth, sidewalk cafe ma/en t extend into or encompass in any manner the existing sideand ma not impian traffic. 4. A sidewalk cafemay not a locatreet corner area defined by building line extended to the t and no cl er t (10') from an alley. However, a cafe may be located betwo feet (2') a d tfrom an alley if the fencing located within ten feet (10') is a that is less th ent (20%) solid. 5. A sidewalk cafe may /Thcontiguous d b\eu building line extended, except for those in a planter. 6. A sidewalk cafe servinhalliguous with a side of the building wherein the establishment is locatcontigquirement may be satisfied by a five foot (5')wide pathway connecuildinafe. The pathway area shall be under the control of the establishis suh annual fee. 7. A cafe on the sidewalk not auil ' g must be located a minimum of two feet (2') from the curb as mby thecept r unique circumstances (such as being adjacent to a street caerminby th City Manager or designee. 1. Except as provicl6d herein, a sidewalk cafe shall not tilize or encompass any public amenities, inclu ng, but not limited to, benches, seats, to es, or receptacles, public art, bike racks/available w er spigots, kiosks, posting pillars, and pe olas. The City Manager or desigpprove the utilization, encompassing, or reloc ion of a public amenity on the condhe cafe owner pay all associated costs. 2. A side may encompass trees, tree rings, light poles, w ter valves, manholes, and stormkes but shall not interfere with their care, maintena ce or operation. Access shall to the City for their care and maintenance. 3. Ameuding trees, tree rings and light poles, shall be considered obstructions for purposes of the requirements of the eight foot (8') unobstructed walkway. 4. The amenities used in the sidewalk cafe area shall be maintained in good condition 5. Upon payment of the electricity fee, the cafe owner may use the City's electrical outlet but only for lights. Fencing (For Cafes Not on the Street) 1. Except during the term of the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to %bru 28 thereafter and except as provided herein for cafes located on City Plaza a on Washington St., the area for a sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by anchored fencin . uring the initial easement agreement and from December 1 to February 28, said a a may be delineatty. ropes or some other suitable method which shall be detectable pedestrians who are vis ally impaired. 2. Fencing shal a constructed of a durable material, such as steel, alumi m, or wrought iron. Wood fencing hall not be allowed. The City shall approve the desig . 3. If stored outdo\toit les, chairs, and other items shall be sec red within the approved fencing at the each day's operation so that they are un able and shall not block or obstruct emergits. If ropes or some other suitable me od is used, tables, chairs and other items shamoved at the end of the day's oper on, and the sidewalk cafe area shall be restorenormal condition as a pedestrian y. 4. The cafe owner shall b responsible for any damage o the public right of way caused by the placement of any and ored fencing. 5. Planters with flowers and/o other vegetation are owed as an alternative to temporary and fencing to delineate the side alk cafe. The des' n of the planters shall be approved by the City Manager, or designee, s ject to the follo mg limitations: a. The planters shall, at the caf owner's op on, be either fastened to each other or removed from the sidewalk or City Pla at the nd of the day's operation along with the tables, chairs, and other items. b. The planters shall not be lesstwenty-seven inches (27") or more than thirty-six inches (36") in height excluding p tints. c. The planters shall be either me I o ave a metal frame. 6. Anchored fencing on a concrete atform r within a planter may remain year around. 7. Notwithstanding any other prov' ion herein, nchored fencing is prohibited in City Plaza and on Washington Street, from inton Street to inn Street. All fencing in those locations must be approved by the City Ma ager, or designee. All 4 (four) sides of the approved fence must be connected to one anot er to prevent movem t of the fencing and said connection must be approved by the CityAngineer or designee. 1. Sidewalk cafes may a located on a platform on top o a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee dete -nes there is excessive slope in th sidewalk and approves the design and if suitable ac ess is provided for persons with disabi'ties. 2. With the approv, I of the City Manager or designee, a side Ik cafe located within an elevated Planter may a end beyond the parameters of the planter i the extension of the cafe is on a platform that' less than 251 of the planter area. All other r quirements stated in this policy, such as cle r walkways, must be met, however, the excessi a slope requirement stated in Platforms or Cafes Not on the Street) - Paragraph 1 would b waived. This platform may remain v ar around. 3. Sidewalk cafes may be located on a concrete platform in the right of way that is not a public sidewalk if the City Manager or designee approves the concrete design and if suitable access is provided for persons with disabilities. Fencing shall not be more than three feet (3') in height, measured from the plane on which the chair sits to the top oZrailing, ing finials. Planters 1. A sidewalk cafe may encompass or utilize an elevated planter if the prthe following criteria, as determined solely by the City: a. It dos not interfere with pedestrian movement. b. It doenot adversely affect drainage. c. It does t adversely affect public or city utilities. d. It does no adversely affect trees, shrubs or other e. It enhances he appearance of the surrounding ar ,and if in City Plaza, it enhances the use of Ci Plaza. f. It does not inte ere with the functionality of an other existing sidewalk cafe. g. It is not otherwis&lcontrary to public interest 2. If utilizing two planters, t e area between the p nters shall be included in the sidewalk cafe area but need not be Jelin ate as such unl s tables and chairs are present. 3. With the consent of the adja ent property wner and first floor tenants, if any, the cafe may extend beyond the building lin extende f the distance between the planter and the building line extended is less than ten et (10' . The cafe may extend beyond additional building lines extended with the consent o th a property owners and first floor tenants, if any. 4. The cafe owner shall pay all costs sociated with the cafe including, but not limited to, the cost to move water mains and w er rvica lines, to remove and plant vegetation, to move electrical outlets, and to cut and estor the limestone. 5. The City may require the cafe wner to a plantings within the cafe area at the cafe owner's cost. 6. If a ramp is required in or r to provide ADA ccessibility to a cafe located within a planter, and it is determined by he City Manager or esignee that ADA accessibility cannot be obtained by incorporati g the ramp within the p nter area, an accessibility ramp may be placed outside of the anter area in a manner app ved by the City Manager or designee. 7. There are a limited mber of planters, and cafes in p nters will entail a substantial financial investment. In i will be used. If owner will have two cafe seaso owners need before anted priority is to another ca " lottery forTal )rd to address these two opposing cc cems, a priority system and a lottery a afe owner enters into an easement reement with the City, said cafe riority over subsequent applicants for a fe in the planter for the following s assuming that the City continues to au orize cafes in planters. Cafe obtain the consent of adjacent property owne s) and first floor tenant(s) only the easement agreement for the first of the th a -year, priority period. The individual business owner of said cafe and ca of be assigned or sold to owner. The lottery for planters will be conducted i the same manner as the as in the street. An esta lishment cannot operate a cafe in the street if there is sufficient room on the sidewalk for a cafe with an area of at least one -hundred twenty square feet (120 sq. ft.). 2. There shall be a minimum four feet (4') buffer on either end of the cafe for safety reasons. These buffers shall be established and maintained by the City and may be used for moped parking and/or bicycle parking. The buffer is subject to the annual fee. As used in this the term sidewalk cafe area does not include the 4 -foot buffer. 11 The sidewalk cafe area may not include the portion of the parking space beyon,Ohe building line extended. The 4 -foot buffer may be located beyond the building line ex nded. 4. Cafes, 'ncI ding the 4 -foot buffer, in each block face cannot utilize mor than thirty percent (30%) o the total parking spaces in that block face. 5. Cafes ca\bea e located in loading zones. 6. Cafes cabe set up before April 1 and shall be remove no later than the Tuesday followingst University of Iowa home football game. fes may have to be removed temporara cafe owner's sole expense to acco odate an event on the street permittee ity (e.g., criterium). 7. The portthe fe located on the street shall be a platform. The design features of the platfhall be submitted with the application nd the design shall be stamped by a professiongineer or architect. The platform hall not impede drainage in the street gutter. 8. The aresidewalk afe shall be deline ed by anchored fencing. Fencing shall be construca durable m terial, such as s el, aluminum, or wrought iron. Wood fencing shall notowed. The Ci shall approv the design. 9. If stored outdoors, tables, chaffs, ander items shall be secured within the anchored fencing at the end of each day's erati n so that they are unusable. 10. The fee shall be a combination of "right of way" fee for the portion of the contiguous requirement; b) the cafe located on the street and an for each parking space regardle s and d) bollard fee. following four (4) fees: a) the annual square footage t cafe located on the sidewalk and the area satisfying an ual square footage "platform" fee for portion of the portio that is be located on the sidewalk; c) the daily fee of thea ount of the parking space that the cafe utilizes; 11. There is no guarantee that Oe City will continbe to authorize cafes in the street. The cafe agreement will include a p ragraph in substanti compliance with the following: Cafe owner further agreement for the u to grant permanent may order said lova reason, the City dei{ cleared of any aVd compensations ou ac owledges andagrees th t no se of portions of the public right f-, perpetual use of its right -of- y .ions and/or uses within the right -o :rmines that said right-of-way is nei all obstructions, and that the cafe d the City elect to do so. property right is conferred by this ay, that the City is not empowered for private purposes, that the City way to cease and desist if, for any sled for a public use and should be ner shall not be entitled to any The "30% limitat' n" limits the number of establishments that OkIl be allowed to operate a cafe on the stre t, and cafes on the street will entail a substantia inancial investment. To address theseA pposing concerns, a priority system and a lottery wi a used. The City will provide inforrryation on the lottery and the priority system on its website. Lottery. TheXogistics and deadlines for the lottery are as follows: Februark 1. In order to be eligible for the lottery, an application with a preliminary (does not have to be drawn by a professional) schematic diagram must be submitted by this date. Applications received after February 11 will be considered on a first come, first serve basis and will be denied if there is no available space. • February 15. If there are competing applications, staff will notify the applicants this date whether they have been selected to enter into easement agreements. C peting applications mean when there are applications for more than 30% of the par g spaces within a block face. The City will conduct a lottery to select applicants. • March 15. The applicant must sign an easement agreement by is date, which is depen ent upon staff approval of its schematic diagram (drawn b a professional) and paymen f all fees (except the parking space fee that will not be iown until the platform is installeA If an applicant does not meet the March 15 deadli e, staff will notify the next applicant thk it is eligible for a cafe on the street. • April 15. The \ext applicant must sign an easement agrp6ment by this date. Note: If one o hese dates falls on a /icontinues applicable deadline will be the following Monday. Priority. If a cafe owner nters into an easent with the City, said cafe owner will have priority over su equent applicantithin the same block face for the following two calendar year assuming that tes to authorize cafes in the street (see Paragraph 12 above). a priority is to business owner of said cafe and cannot be assigned or sold to nother cafe o Fees 1. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes foot. 2. Annual fee for sidewalk cafes lo( placed on the public right-of-way: on the public right-of-way: $5.00 per square on a structure/platform (including concrete platform) 0. 0 per square foot. 3. Annual fee for the area of the si walk c fe utilizing an elevated planter on the public right- of-way: $10.00 per square foot The ann al fee for the portion of a "planter' sidewalk cafe that is not located on theYeleved planter: 5.00 per square foot. 4. Annual fee for a sidewalocated on t street: $5.00 per square foot for the area located on the sidewalk 0.00 square fo t for the area located on the platform on the street plus daily fee forerking space as t forth in the City Code (presently, $20.00 per day) for every day thrm is on the stree plus bollard fee. 5. Deposit for sidewalk This deposit shall be prior condition by they which place anchored 1 ided if the right-of-way, valk cafe owner to the 6. Deposit for sidew k cafes which place a structure/pl regardless of whether anchored fencing is used: $500.0 the structure/pla orm is removed, and the right -of way is sidewalk cafe olmner to the satisfaction of the City. in the public right-of-way: $200.00. anter if applicable, is restored to its tion of the City. DDtform on the public right-of-way, . This deposit shall be refunded if res ored to its prior condition by the 7. Deposit for s' ewalk cafes which utilize an elevated planter r placement of a concrete platform in t e public right-of-way: $1,000.00. This deposit shat a refunded if the platform or concrete/is removed, and the right-of-way is restored to its prior%fe dition by the sidewalk cafe own to the satisfaction of the City. 8. If the initi I easement agreement is for less than one season, thelisted in Paragraphs 1-4 above shall be prorated on a quarterly basis. 9. Electricity fee for using electrical outlet for lights for cafes in planters: $45 per year. 10. Bollard Fee: Actual cost of the bollards based on a five (5) year life cycle plus one (1) hour labor at the MW II pay grade to install, maintain, and remove the 4 -foot buffer. If the platform is removed temporarily during the year, the labor fee is assessed again when the pla m is reinstalled. A minimum of two (2) bollards will be required, and the City shall de rmine if additi nal bollards are needed. 11. Record g fee for the easement agreement: Actual fee charge/County er. Ci1. TheCityM ager is authorized to approve any other provision restriction regarding thse of the public right of way by a sidewalk cafstent with this policy or t e City Code. Section 10-3-3 of the Citv Code A. Sidewalk cafes are permitted in the public right of way only in the CB -2, CB -5 d CB -10 zones (the downtown and the commercial areas directly north and south of the wntown). B. No perso shall operate a sidewalk cafe without executing an easement agr ment. C. Each side Ik cafe applicant shall file an application for an easement greement with the Public WorkDepartment, on forms provided by the City. D. The City Mane er, or designee, shall either grant or deny the ap ication within thirty (30) days of the appli tion being filed. If the application is granted, the ity Manager, or designee, is authorized to a ter into a public right of way easement agr ement. If the application is denied, the applica t may appeal to the City Council by filin a written appeal with the City Council, and the ap als process shall be the same as pr ided for mobile vendors in this chapter. The City reta' s the right to limit the number of s' ewalk cafes. E. After execution of an a ement agreement, the City nager, or designee, shall retain the right to terminate the eas ment agreement but only er written notice of violation has been given and the time to cure a violation has expired. rounds for termination of the easement agreement shall include, b not be limited to, r peated violations of the state and liquor control laws, violations of th easement agree ent, and creating a safety hazard, health hazard and/or public nuisance under state or ocal law. Additionally, the City Manager, or designee, retains the right to rminate th easement agreement and direct removal of sidewalk cafe operations if there a subs ntial and reasonable need for use of the public right of way for a valid public purp e. T cafe owner has the right to appeal a decision to terminate the agreement to the Ci C ncil. The appeals process shall be the same as provided for mobile vendors in this ch ter. F. The easement agreement, at a m' im m, shall require the cafe operator to provide a certificate of insurance satisfacto to th City, and shall agree to hold the City harmless against any and all liability arising rom or r sting to the operation of the sidewalk cafe or the location of the cafe on the publi right of wa including, but not limited to, all claims arising from occurrences or accidents ithin the side Ik cafe area, including the walkway through a cafe. G. Sidewalk cafes shall opera only between the ho s of seven o'clock (7:00) A.M. and twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight. H. Food and beverages mVst be available for service t&patrons in a sidewalk cafe during all hours of operation. SidgWalk cafes shall not operate w n the restaurant kitchen is closed. I. A sidewalk cafe servi g alcoholic beverages shall havemployee monitoring the area at all times during the ours alcohol is consumed and shall eispense any alcoholic beverage under state and loc I law J. Amplified sounieaulations. quipment shall not be permitted. K. The operation ny sidewalk cafe shall be in conformity with pplicable federal, state, and local laws and M. All fees for t e operation of a sidewalk cafe shall be set by resolutik. N. The City anager is authorized to establish administrative rules not inconsistent with any ordinanc or policy adopted by the City Council. A copy of the policy and rules shall be on file with t e City Clerk and available of the City website. Item Number: 7.j. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest the FY22 28E Agreement between the City of Iowa City and Johnson County for the Mobility Coordinator position. Prepared By: Darian Nagle-Gamm; Transportation Services Director Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin; City Manager Fiscal Impact: $35,610 in FY22 which will come from the Transit Operations Aid -to - Agencies budget. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution 28E Agreement Executive Summary: This is a resolution to continue the joint funding agreement with Johnson County Social Services for the Mobility Coordinator position which provides transportation and mobility referrals, education, and community outreach in Iowa City and across the metro area. Background /Analysis: Specific goals of the position are to increase awareness of the public transit system and improve mobility for the following groups of persons: the elderly, low-income individuals, persons with disabilities/medical issues, and the mobility -challenged. The Mobility Coordinator helps residents reach their destinations by providing information on community transportation options, offering trip planning and trip planning education, and transit system training. The Mobility Coordinator position was initially established with 50% state grant funding. The remaining 50% was split between Johnson County (50%), Iowa City (35%), and Coralville (15%). Grant funding for the position has since receded. Under the FY22 agreement, the contribution percentages would remain the same. However, local entities will contribute to the total costs of the position including salary, benefits, supplies, and mileage. Iowa City's total contribution in FY22 is $35,610. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Agreement Iowa Secretary of State 321 East 12th Street Des Moines, IA 50319 sos. iowa.gov Full Legal Name Party 1 City of Iowa City Party Johnson County Participants 400 -TRANSPORTATION Service Type 28E Agreement Organization Type County City Johnson County Johnson FILED Filing Date: 07/09/2021 11:08 AM Filing Number: M513892 28E Agreement between the City of Iowa City and Johnson County for the Mobility Coordinator position (21-134) Purpose 06/30/2022 Duration 21-134.pdf Upload Scanned Agreement Contact Person: (Optional) Kellie Contact First Name Fruehling Contact Last Name City Clerk Job Title City Clerk Department kellie-fruehling@iowa-city.org Email Address 1 319-356-5041 Phone Number Prepared by: Darian Nagle-Gamm; Transportation Services, 335 Iowa Ave., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5156 Resolution No. 21-134 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest the FY22 28E Agreement between the City of Iowa City and Johnson County for the Mobility Coordinator position. Whereas, Chapter 28E, Code of Iowa, provides, in substance, that any power which may be exercised by a public agency of this state may be exercised jointly with another public agency having such power; and Whereas, it is in the mutual interest of the City of Iowa City and Johnson County to encourage the use of public transit and provide transportation assistance to elderly, low-income, persons with disabilities, and the mobility challenged; and Whereas, the Mobility Coordinator assists Iowa City residents reach their destinations by providing information on community transportation options, offering trip planning services and education, and providing transit system training for the elderly, low-income, persons with disabilities, and the mobility challenged; and Whereas, the parties have also negotiated a 28E Agreement for the contracting of paratransit services for FY21. Now, Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The attached 28E Agreement for Mobility Coordinator services between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, and Johnson County, Iowa is hereby approved in substance, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute and the City Clerk to attest to a 28E Agreement for the Mobility Coordinator position with Johnson County that makes no material changes in substance. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a copy of said agreement with the Secretary of the State of Iowa, as required by Iowa Code Chapter 28E. Passed and approved this 181 day of May, 2021. Mayor Attest: Approved by Resolution No. 21-134 Page 2 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Berg us x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner 28E Agreement for Mobility Coordinator between the City of Iowa City and Johnson County for the period of July 1st, 2021 through June 30, 2022 This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, hereinafter referred to as "Iowa City", and Johnson County, Iowa, hereinafter referred to as the "County". Scope of Services The Comity shall provide to Iowa City through Johnson County Social Services, Mobility Coordinator services. The Mobility Coordinator will provide transportation referrals, education and community outreach, improving the overall mobility for elderly, disabled and low-income residents. General Terms Johnson County, Coralville and Iowa City will jointly fund the Mobility Coordinator position. Johnson County will pay 50%, Coralvlle will pay 15% and Iowa City will pay 35% of the total expenses related to the position including salary, benefits, supplies and mileage. Iowa City's contribution for the period of this agreement will be equivalent to 35% of the actual expenses as described hereni, however the total amount paid by Iowa City for this position for the duration of this contract shall not exceed $35,610. Each party agrees to release, indemnify and hold the other party, its officers and employees harmless from and against any and all liabilities, damages, business interruptions, delays, losses, claims, judgments, of any kind whatsoever, including all costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incidental thereto, which may be suffered by, or charged to, the other party by reason of any loss or damage to any property or injury to or death of any person arising out of or by reason of any breach, violation or non-performance by the party or its servants, employees or agents of any covenant or condition of this Agreement or by any act or failure to act of those persons. The County shall not be liable for any loss, injury, damage or delay of any nature whatsoever resulting from the County's failure to perform if caused by any act of God, fire, flood, accident, strike, labor dispute, riot, insurrection, war or any other cause beyond the County's control" Iowa City service provided by the Mobility Coordinator will be documented and provided to Iowa City upon request. Service is any assistance in regards to questions and/or travel training, and/or updates of transportation needs and/or accepted assignment of work requested by Iowa City Transit. Compensation and Duration This agreement shall be for a period of twelve (12) months effective July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. This agreement may be tnodifled at any tune by mutual written agreement of the parties. The contracted amount contained herein represents Iowa City's full and complete financial responsibility toward the Mobility Coordinator position. For the term running from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, the County shall invoice Iowa City monthly for costs associated with providing the Mobility Coordinator position under this Agreement. The monthly proportional costs for Iowa City shall be calculated based Page 1 of 3 on the total cost of the tiffi-time position. The monthly invoice shall show in detail Iowa City monthly expenses and pay for the Mobility Coordinator, Iowa City shall pay the monthly cost within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice. If either party chooses to terminate this agreetnent, a 60 -day wiiten notice mist be provided. Extent of Agreement No separate legal entity is establisited by this Agreement. This Agreement is between public agencies contracting to per£otm govetrunental service pursuant to Iowa Code Section 28EJ2, Pursuant to Iowa Code Section 28E.8(1)(a) (2021) Iowa City shall file this Agreement, in an electronic format, with the Secretary of State of Iowa in the tnatner specified by the Secretary of State. The County Social Services Director shall administer this Agreenxnt and the services described in A. The Agreement does not provide fur the acclarsition of joint personal or real property. Tho Agreement represents the entire agreement between Iowa City and Johnson County for the Mobility Coordinator position, It may be amended only by a written instrument sighed by both parties. Assignment '[Ills Agreement is not assignable without written consent of both patties. Dated this day of JuMf 20 Z/�, CITY OP IOWA MY JON COUNTY, IOWA By: 73: y Y �iet'z•- —rollrlaI c---- ,.2 c� 9..... -�. t ce Teague , I at Heiden, CtmirpetTm Attest, t Attest: !-*A ' Cit, Cloric Cd mty Atix i or Apgro City Attorney's Ogee Page 2 of 3 CITY ACKNO WLEDGEM ENT SCATEOFfOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) On this 18 th day of May 120 21 , before me, Christine Olney a Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa, personally appeared Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruelding, tome personaltyknown,and, wbo,beingby me duly sworn, did say that they are the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, ofthe City of Iowa City, Iowa; that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that the instrument was signed and sealed on behalf ofthe corporation, by authority of its City Council, as contained in (Ordinance) (Resolution) No, 21-134 passed by the City Council, on the 16th day of May , 20 24, and that Bruce'r'eague and Kellie Fruehring acknowledged the execution of the ins trurnent to be their voluntary act and deed and a voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by it voluntarily executed. S� �� H %, cr r CHRISTINEOLNEY N ry '0 commission Number as eS32 Comm ssl n Exp + S- STATEOFIOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) My commission expires: COUNTY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT On this / 7Y -A day of au,e , 20�_ before me,i_�'I c�� / , allotary Public in and for the State of Iowa, personally appeared Pat Heid llanCd Travis Weipert, to me personally known, and, who, beingby me duly sworn, did say that they are the Chairperson of the Board of Supervisors and County Auditor, respectively, of the County of Johnson, Iowa; that the seal affixed to the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of the corporation, and that the instrument was signed and sealed on behalf of the corporation, by authority of its Bogrd of Supervisors, as contained in the M ofon adopted by the Board of Supervisors, on the 171 l day of M , n C 20and Pat Heiden and Travis Weipert acknowledge the execution of the instrument to be their voluntary act and deed and the voluntary act and deed of the corporation, by it voluntarily executed. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa My commnission expires: HAEL H. HENSCH L*7August ISSION NUMBER 704787 OMMISSION EXPIRES Page 3 of 3 23, 2021 Item Number: 7.k. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the Marketing Agreement between the City of Iowa City and MidAmerican Energy. Prepared By: Darian Nagle-Gamm; Transportation Services Director Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin; City Manager Fiscal Impact: $25,000 in annual Transit Fund revenue would be gained by approval of this Agreement. Recommendations: Staff: Approval 1 •1 u . " ► /G1 Attachments: Resolution Agreement Executive Summary: This is a resolution to establish a marketing agreement with MidAmerican Energy to apply an exterior graphic wrap to (4) of the City's new electric buses scheduled to arrive this fall. MidAmerican will pay the City $25,000 per year for the exterior graphic wraps and on -board promotional flyers. Background /Analysis: The City has adopted a Climate Action Plan, advancing an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change. As part of the Plan, the City has committed to transitioning its fleet to electric or other no/low emission vehicles. MidAmerican Energy, the City's energy provider, delivers 61.3% of its Iowa customer's annual energy needs with renewable energy, mostly from wind, and is positioned to deliver 100% renewable energy to its Iowa customers in the future. The City and MidAmerican Energy are aligned in their goals of advancing the use of renewable energy and encouraging adoption of electric vehicles. The City and MidAmerican Energy seek to market their shared efforts through the graphic exterior wraps which will be applied to the City's first four (4) electric buses set to be delivered this fall. MidAmerican Energy has agreed to pay the City $25,000 per year for exterior bus wraps and interior promotional posters for three years, with successive one (1) year renewal terms unless either party wishes to decline renewal. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Agreement -I V. Prepared by: Darian Nagle-Gamm, Director of Transportation Services, 1200 S Riverside Drive., Iowa City, IA 52245 (319)356-5156 Resolution No. 21-135 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the Marketing Agreement between the City of Iowa City and MidAmerican Energy Whereas, the City has adopted a Climate Action Plan, advancing an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change; and Whereas, as part of that Plan, the City is transitioning to electric transit buses; and Whereas, MidAmerican delivered 61.3% of its Iowa customers' annual energy needs with renewable energy, and is positioned to deliver 100% renewable energy to its Iowa customers in the future; and Whereas, both the City and MidAmerican wish to advance the use of renewable energy; and Whereas, the City and MidAmerican wish to encourage adoption of electric vehicles and renewable energy by marketing their shared efforts through graphic exterior wraps applied to four (4) of the City's new electric buses ("the Marketing Program"); and Whereas, the Marketing Program calls for MidAmerican to pay the City $25,000 in each of the next three years for displaying the exterior wraps. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: The attached Marketing Agreement between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, and MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC is hereby approved in substance, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the agreement. 2. The City Manager is further authorized to manage the Marketing Agreement for the City, including terminating the agreement under its terms should he deem that to be in the best interests of the City. Passed and approved this 18th day of ATTEST: . , �+ City Jerk It was move by Thomas 202L. J (Eric Goers — 05/11/2021) and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Resolution No. 21-135 Page 2 AYES NAYS ABSENT Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Marketing Agreement Parties: This Marketing Agreement (hereinafter, the "Agreement") Is hereby made between the City of Iowa City (hereinafter, the "City"), an Iowa Municipal corporation, and MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC (hereinafter, "MidAmerican"), together, the "Parties". Recitals; Whereas, the City has adopted a Climate Action Plan, advancing an effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and combat climate change; and Whereas, as part of that Plan, the City is transitioning to electric transit buses; and Whereas, MidAmerican delivered 61.3% of its Iowa customers' annual energy needs with renewable energy, and is positioned to deliver 100% renewable energy to Its Iowa customers In the future; and Whereas, both the City and MidAmerican wish to advance the use of renewable energy; and Whereas, the City and MidAmerican wish to encourage adoption of electric vehicles and renewable energy by marketing their shared efforts through graphic exterior wraps applied to four (4) of the City's new electric buses ("the Marketing Program"); Now, therefore, the Parties agree to the following terms and conditions: Terms and Conditions: 1. Payment. MidAmerican shall pay the City twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,ODO) per year for the Marketing Program. The payment for the first year (the "original term") shall be made within thirty (30) days of the last date execution of this Agreement by both Parties (hereinafter, the "Execution Date"). Payments for subsequent years shall be due on the anniversary of the Execution Date. 2. Marketing Program. In exchange for the payment set forth in paragraph 1, the City shall do all of the following: a. Apply a graphic exterior wrap to four (4) of the City's new electric buses that promotes the purposes stated In this Agreement. MidAmerican shall be responsible for the design of the wraps, which shall be subject to the City's approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. b. Maintain the wraps in good repair throughout the term of the Agreement. In the event of physical damage to or loss of an electric bus that has been wrapped as part of the Marketing Program, the City shall have the option, at Its sole discretion, to repair or replace the wrap on said bus, or to designate another electric bus to serve in its place. In such event the City shall cause the replacement bus to be similarly wrapped. c. In addition to the wraps, the City shall cause promotional fliers to be placed and maintained at two locations in the interior of buses designated to participate In the Marketing Program. MidAmerican shall be responsible for the design of the fliers, which likewise shall be subject to the City's approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years from the Execution Date. Thereafter, this Agreement shall automatically renew under the same terms and conditions for successive one (1) year renewal terms, unless either Party provides written notice to the other Party, no later than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the original or renewal term, that they do not wish to renew the Agreement. 4. Early Termination. Anything in paragraph 3 notwithstanding, either Party may terminate this Agreement without cause at any time before expiration of the original Agreement term or any renewal thereof. If the City terminates the Agreement pursuant to this paragraph, it shall return the payment made by MidAmerican for the current year, within forty-five (45) days of termination date. If MidAmerican terminates the Agreement pursuant to this paragraph, it shall forfeit any payments made, as well as any rights it had pursuant to this Agreement, other than those set forth in paragraph 6. 5. Removal of Wraps and Filers. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason, the City shall be responsible for removal of the wraps and promotional fliers from buses designated to participate in the Marketing Program. 6. Rights to MidAmerican logo and trademarks. The City shall have a license to use MldAmerican's logo and trademarks on such wraps and filers as are approved by MidAmerican under this Agreement. Such license shall terminate on expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason. MidAmerican shall remain the sole and exclusive owner of its logo and all trademarks. 7. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties, and overrides and supersedes any prior oral promises, understandings, or agreements. B. Amendments. This Agreement can be amended only in writing signed by both Parties. 9. Severability. In the event any portion of this Agreement is deemed illegal, unconstitutional, or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining terms shall remain in full force and effect, so long as the primary purpose of the Agreement Is not defeated by the severance. 10. Law and Jurisdiction. This Agreement and the Parties' performance shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Iowa, without reference to its provisions concerning conflicts of laws, and shall be subject to all applicable rules and regulations of regulatory authorities having jurisdiction. In the event jurisdiction lies in the Iowa district courts, the Parties agree to venue in Johnson County. Iowa. TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO ATRIAL BYJURY IN RESPECT OF LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, UNDER OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, EACH PARTY FURTHER WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO CONSOLIDATE ANY ACTION IN WHICH AJURY TRIAL HAS BEEN WAIVED WITH ANY OTHER ACTION IN WHICH AJURY TRIAL CANNOT BE OR HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED. 11, Authority. The individuals executing this Agreement warrant that they have the authority to bind the Parties for which they are signing. For the City of Iowa City Geoff Fruin City Manager S/i9/ z i Date For MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC Kathryn K ert, VJre President, Economic Connections and Integration Date Item Number: 7.1. �, CITY OF IOWA CITY -�"�'�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution authorizing the procurement of a replacement On -street Parking Meter System Electronics for the City of Iowa City Transportation Services Department. Prepared By: Mark Rummel, Assistant Transportation Services Director Reviewed By: Darian Nagle-Gamm, Transportation Services Director Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager Sue Dulek, Interim City Attorney Fiscal Impact: T3020 -2021 -Equipment -474420 $494,325 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: On November 5, 2020, a Request for Proposal for On -street Parking Meter System Replacement for the City of Iowa City Transportation Services Department was posted to the City of Iowa City web site. The City received proposals from Duncan Parking Technologies Inc, Baker Group, and I PS. Proposals were distributed to an Evaluation Committee, which consisted of representatives from the Transportation Services Department. After a complete evaluation of all the submitted proposals, the Evaluation Committee recommended Duncan Parking Technologies Inc to receive the contract award for On -street Parking Meter System Replacement. Background /Analysis: Transportation Services currently operates 1,084 single space parking meters from Duncan Parking Technologies, Inc. The current meters utilize 3G cellular connection to process credit card payments and provide transaction data to a back -end management platform. Wireless providers are phasing out the 3G technology in 2021. Our current meters will not be able to communicate after 2021 necessitating their replacement, which result in a loss of ability to process credit card transactions. Over the course of this 5 -year contract, the city expects to expend approximately $494,325. This project was included as a part of the approved CI P project T3020 Replacement of Electronics in Smart Parking Meters. Funds for this purchase are available under account number T3020 -2021 -Equipment -474420. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Mark Rummel, Associate Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5097 Resolution No. 21-136 Resolution authorizing the procurement of a replacement On -street Parking Meter System Electronics for the City of Iowa City Transportation Services Department. Whereas, a Request for Proposal was released to solicit the procurement of a replacement On - Street Parking Meter System Electronics for the City of Iowa City Transportation Services Department; and Whereas, the City's current parking meters will not be able to process credit card transactions after December 2021 due to a discontinuation of their 3G cellular network; and Whereas, the current parking meter electronics were installed in 2013 and are approaching the end of their useful life, Whereas, three proposals were received for these services and the evaluation committee selected Duncan;and Whereas, the City's purchasing policy requires City Council to approve purchases for commodities and services over $150,000; and Whereas, the City expects to expend approximately $494,325.00 for the procurement of a replacement On -street Parking Meter System Electronics for the City of Iowa City Transportation Services Department; and Whereas, funds for this purchase are available in the operating budget under account number T3020 -2021 -Equipment -474420; and Whereas, approval of this purchase is in the public interest. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The proposed procurement as described is approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized to sign the agreement with the vendor and take whatever steps are necessary to effectuate future purchases including any amendments or renewals of said agreement. Passed and approved this 18th day of May , 20_21_. ATTEST: ARpro-MIIII by h City Attorney's Office - 05/12/2021 Resolution No. 21-136 Page 2 It was move by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Bergus x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner Item Number: 8.a. �r P_ CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org May 18, 2021 Motion setting a public hearing for June 1, 2021 on an ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 48.75 acres of land located west of N. 1st Avenue and south of Scott Boulevard from Interim Development Single - Family Residential (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). (REZ20-0016) ATTACHMENTS: Description May 6 PZ Memo wAttachments March 18 PZ Memo wAttachments Feb 18 PZ Staff Report wAttachments CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM CITY OF IOWA CITY Date: May 6, 2021 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Re: REZ20-0016 — Hickory Trail Rezoning Resubmission Background Information: On February 18, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public meeting on a rezoning of approximately 48.75 acres of land from Interim Development — Single Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). Staff recommended approval with five conditions related to approval of a Woodland Management Plan, provision of trail connections, incorporation of traffic calming devices, installation of right-of-way trees, and platting requirements. The motion to approve the rezoning failed by a vote of 0-7. On March 18, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public meeting to discuss a revised OPD Plan that was submitted by the applicant. The motion to approve the rezoning failed by a vote of 1-6. The applicant, Axiom Consultants, applying on behalf of Joseph Clark and Nelson Development 1, LLC., has submitted a further revised OPD Plan and Sensitive Areas Development Plan (Attachment #1) for the Commission's consideration. Revised Submission: The most recent OPD Plan contains the following changes to the layout from the previous plans that were reviewed by the Commission: 1. The removal of the condo -style housing in the northwest portion of the plan area. The revised Plan contains 41 lots intended for detached single-family housing. 2. A single -loaded street is proposed for approximately 71 % of the south and west sides of the proposed Hickory Trail extension. A double -loaded street is still proposed for the northern 29% of the street extension. 3. The acreage in Outlot A, that is proposed to be dedicated to the City for the expansion of Hickory Hill Park, would be increased from 11.66 acres to 14.02 acres. 4. Per staff, the applicant has added a third pedestrian crossing, which will be adjacent to the proposed traffic circle. 5. Per staff, the applicant has also added an additional sidewalk accessing the senior living facility from the public sidewalk on the east side of the facility. 6. The percent of impacted critical slopes went down from 17% to 13%. Additionally, the percent of preserved woodlands went up from 46% to 51%. RS -5 zones require a woodland retention requirement of 50%. Because the amount of woodlands preserved exceeds 50%, mitigation is no longer required. 7. The applicant has increased the stream corridor buffer to 25 feet on each side of the stream corridor. April 30, 2021 Page 2 8. The applicant has provided a buildable area analysis (Attachment #2) that illustrates the allowable buildable area within Lots 10-31. While Lots 10-31 have a total lot size ranging between approximately 15,000 and 35,000 square feet, the buildable area of these lots minus conservation easement land and setbacks, will be roughly between 4,700 and 7,600 square feet. Staff has determined that the buildable area of these lots is comparable to the buildable area of an 8,000 square foot lot, which is the minimum lot size allowed in an RS -5 zone. 9. The applicant has also submitted updated renderings (Attachment #3) and elevations (Attachment #4) for the senior living facility. The updated renderings show some additional views of the facility, while the updated elevations show the total height on each side of the facility. Figures 1 and 2 below show the change in layout from the original OPD Plan (Figure 1) that was presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on the February 18th meeting, versus the current plan (Figure 2) presented on the May 6th meeting. -figure .i — req. -ibtn hicKory i rau uru rear Comprehensive Plan: S�.HIC Fiaure 2 — April 29th Hickory Trail OPD Plan Figures 3 and 4 show a comparison between the Bluffwood Neighborhood conceptual vision from the Northeast District Plan and the current proposed OPD Plan. While the proposed OPD Plan uses a through street, as opposed to two cul-de-sacs, the current proposed OPD Plan features a � 6f 1- m Figures 3 and 4 show a comparison between the Bluffwood Neighborhood conceptual vision from the Northeast District Plan and the current proposed OPD Plan. While the proposed OPD Plan uses a through street, as opposed to two cul-de-sacs, the current proposed OPD Plan features a April 30, 2021 Page 3 similar single -loaded street frontage, with most of the central and southern portions of the development showing housing only on one side of the street. Figure 3 — Bluffwood Neighborhood Figure 4 — April 29' Hickory Trail OPD Plan NE District Plan 11;13-1 P IJ J. 4 � . } L F ■ 2P 4 -0 'j# : w� #40 AWItjIP Parks and Recreation Commission: At its April 14th meeting, staff presented the OPD Plan's proposed parkland dedication in Outlot A to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The purpose of the meeting was to obtain recommendations from the Commission to the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the dedication of land. After discussion, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended to defer any formal recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission until the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation of approval. The proposed dedication of parkland will be discussed at a future Parks and Recreation Commission meeting if the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation of approval. Landscaping: The City Forrester has reviewed the landscaping plan associated with the proposed OPD Plan and finds the landscaping plan to be satisfactory. The plan provides a mix of native and well- behaved non-native species, which is something the City strives for to create a more resilient urban forest. As many non-native species are well adapted to grow in Iowa City's growing conditions, they are also more resilient against non-native pests. This approach helps to promote diversity and tree resiliency in Iowa City's forests. m �n � � F w, i, 15 ; At its April 14th meeting, staff presented the OPD Plan's proposed parkland dedication in Outlot A to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The purpose of the meeting was to obtain recommendations from the Commission to the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the dedication of land. After discussion, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended to defer any formal recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission until the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation of approval. The proposed dedication of parkland will be discussed at a future Parks and Recreation Commission meeting if the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation of approval. Landscaping: The City Forrester has reviewed the landscaping plan associated with the proposed OPD Plan and finds the landscaping plan to be satisfactory. The plan provides a mix of native and well- behaved non-native species, which is something the City strives for to create a more resilient urban forest. As many non-native species are well adapted to grow in Iowa City's growing conditions, they are also more resilient against non-native pests. This approach helps to promote diversity and tree resiliency in Iowa City's forests. April 30, 2021 Page 4 Proposed Conditions: Staff proposes the following conditions for the rezoning. These conditions are the same conditions that were recommended for the February 18th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. In accordance with the subdivider's agreement at final platting, approval of a Woodland Management Plan that shall consist of a plan to remove any invasive species within the Outlot A area, as well as removal of any hazardous trees or limbs. The plan shall be prepared by a woodland specialist and approved by the City Forrester. Invasive species removal will be the responsibility of the owner and must be completed prior to transfer of Outlot A to the City. 2. Provision of trail connections, as shown on the concept plan dated 04/29/2021. The trail connections should be provided in the same location as shown on the concept plan and must be constructed before public improvements to the corresponding subdivision are approved. 3. The final plat shall incorporate traffic calming devices, including but not limited to raised crosswalks at park entrances, in locations approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Where trees are shown on the landscaping plan, installation of right-of-way trees, to be planted by Owner or its successor, along the proposed Hickory Trial right-of-way. Said trees shall be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each lot, or, if said certificate of occupancy is issued during a poor planting season, by May 31 following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Right-of-way trees shall be consistent with the approved landscaping plan that has been reviewed by the City Forrester. Trees shall be planted generally 30' apart, though the City recognizes that exact locations may vary depending on driveway locations, signage, and other utility conflicts. Final location and species of the trees shall be approved on a lot -by -lot basis prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. 5. No building permit shall be issued for any of the subject property until the City Council approves a final plat subdividing the subject property to confirm to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. Attachments: 1. Revised OPD and Sensitive Areas Development Plan and Landscape Plan (04.29.2021) 2. Buildable Area Exhibit 3. May Meeting Correspondence 4. Updated Senior Living Facility Renderings 5. Updated Senior Living Facility Elevations Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA H OUTLOTS: APPLICANT 1: APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: OUTLOT SF ACRES INTENDED USE A 610,692 14.02 DEDICATED TO CITY FOR PARK SPACE B 193.577 4A4 CONSERVATION EASEMENT ROW 191,374 4.39 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR NELSON DEVELOPMENT I, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE F HICKORY TRAIL EXTENSION NOTES: 1. NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ARE PRESENT. BPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA APPLICANT 1: APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: s O G. JOSEPH CLARK PHELAN TUCKER LAW Z 221 E. BURLINGTON ST JOHN BEASLEY CITY CLERK DATE IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 321 E. MARKETST 0 IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 21 ATTORNEY: S NELSON DEVELOPMENT I, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE F ATTN:JACCB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON I� 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 I DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 > JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BOALTON@KMCLAW.COM LOT /IAH 4.3BAC 191,37 SF A 7 28 ` US / 27 LEGEND: SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOURINDEX-1o0- ]op CONTOURINTERMEDIATE- 101 - FENCE'. BARB WIFE -----v-v-v- SFREAM CENTERLINE - - - - --- SIGN CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS c TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSUDEAT ON EASEMENT SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER STEP SLOPE (M2B%) IMPACTED STEEP SCOPE (1825%) CnnDnLSION GELATIN) :- IMPACTOR CRHICAL SLOPE ,I I2E mxl PROTECTED SLOPE 1, SPI) WOODLAND PRESFRVATON D IIEADRESRVOWLNPEAt N BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR J— BOPOSEDTREE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PUN I y b \KC \ ll KEY NOTES: _ - HATCHED AREAIN WOODLAND eETEN1ION ULcuunorED jl��� S 1. 31 32 _ a (A) CONSERVATION ASEMENT US 5 33 A LET .� J�m4 24 e� OUToOT B - 2, - F 25 AT 23 c % y 35 22 0 3 01°fi "C-- �r �� 36 37 2III,1 T1111,�19�� - 14, - �ZO 18 - 1 14 a/% OT I IF 39 Al17 16�/ 15 14, 13 11 10 9. `,8, 7 S—i - IF, -F 38 p, -�, - 404 �� 12- 411 FILEIFFLIE ITa 711 42 I; 6 E, - - - ip < -- /i \�`'' •\ w- OUTLOTA I I L7VEN YI �, — z FEE S. IS "12 X i `\ i�< IF .o � - i �� I I i ( -� 0 \II 11 s O J Z I F�1 I 5 0 U O S J F I I� a a I I > II I } I I 1 0 Ln w s0 s O LED Z F�1 5 0 U O J F garLLl r a a ? > a } w p IF A vw u w Z �R San! o Ln Ln w s O w Z F�1 5 0 U O J F garLLl r a a ? > a } w p 2 F vw u w Z �R San! 2 a LOS l7 MEETNUMBER: C1.00 Ln w s O U F a J Q w w 3 LL San! aJ ~ LU O N N v N N MEETNUMBER: C1.00 APPLICANT 1: APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: PRELIMINARYOPD AND G.JOSEPHCLARK PHELAN TUCKER LAW 221 E. BURLINGTON ST JOHN BEASLEY (" I I ! \., I �Z SENSITIVE AREAS °W^GITY,IOWA52240 321E CITY, 22 J \ a IOWA CITY, IA 52245 DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE IMPACTED QUANTITIES: T I A�N:BRYCE K. DALTON H I C KO RY T RA I L 2 6 6TH AVE STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE UITE 400 CRITICAL SLOPES STEEP SLOPES _ `\ I / \ IJ 8 IOWA CITY, IOWA LOCATION DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 1,466 1 40,906 2 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM 1,058 3 NOTES: 5,036 4 3,486 L THERE ARE PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT ABUFFER 1,418 5 EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE IS PROVIDED. NO PROTECTED SLOPES OR BUFFERS ARE IMPACTED WITH THIS PROJECT. 1,885 6 11188 a 2. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE I MPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 35% OF THE TOTAL. 1;399 CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA ISE) PERCENTAGE 3 IMPACTED SLOPES 40,401 13% (�4 NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 237,292 73% NON IMPACTED SLOPES IN PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER 44,026 14% 5,422 CRITICAL SLOPES PPIQfl TO DEVELOPMENT) 321,719 IDD% ?I 7 1 4,195 6,713 1,650 2,458 3,932 4,143 3. STEEP SLOPE CALCULATION AREA SO PERCENTAGE IMPACTED SLOPES 90,807 28% I >Ay I NONIMPACTEDSLOPES 235.156 R% 3,051 STEEP SLOPES IPRIOR TO DIWELOPMENTI 325,963 100% \ I 10,388 I \ 1 TOTAL 90,81C)OF >B8 V1 1 Qfl LOCATION AREA (SF) LOCATION AREA (SF) 1 1,466 1 40,906 2 3,782 1,058 3 320 5,036 4 3,486 9 1,418 5 6,863 0 1,885 6 11188 a 972 7 1;399 2,940 8 322 3 6,318 42 (�4 15,192 0 1,933 4,785 5,422 965 834 7 1 4,195 6,713 1,650 2,458 3,932 4,143 5,881 5,287 TOTAL 40,401 3,466 �\ 3,051 624 11,764 10,388 TOTAL 90,81C)OF NV -Q -� I, 1// 5 / ^ ipBp100 ai I / 5 v v 753 A 49 E Nil zz I� _ V:.{�1c I z3 _\ 1 \\ \1 \ \ io / t� s z z 1( \ z Z 29 £o 0 9 � g ^ 24 V 1 439'Ac _ t 1 31 !� V 12 � 4/ / 41 91,374 SF.9.. FI / 11 % \\ 2♦ - -. c 32 r 26"` 196„��7 AC' 9> Sr 30 5 33OVAL so SF L B V v 2477 SP 135 ZA n _a,,. -- / r/ - ) -- �e I� �,Fa °q`F )I'y H R'1 624 5F 22 21 \ �, y v\ i o 307A4e r - �/ zs !�'E62q A G I O w 5 v .� 71nSE 19 a7 - it 00 v z Q 34 37 �> 1.1`+Aun 16 - �w Y f .-� >326a1 I�� K 2 F w i 38 -r 15 ��1 ddd_ 1°x�o 39__ ���, �a�� 14 13 11 1 2 �7 �u z� LO� AC �..�6 4gsr_ a s 26 1 6 s ,r I x a u�i l7 40 41 _., "u' T� T y N 6 v 2 J vE n. 1, �✓ I Sb rKA }IIULl l0rLpOT 0 AC 61692 SF ElllfiU _-�Ir. i Z w 0 x l ul ��dIVfSL V1ai:e ��� w 4moY7�SSJ?` \� \� \ ^ �\ �� L[4nf(+lrV fndI Sn 7 -V l� r01 "V z w l GO a wZELI CD GCD C1.10 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA APPLICANT 1: G. JOSEPH CLARK 221 E. BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 APPLICANT 2: NEL50N DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC ATTNAACOB WOLFGANG 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 JACOB@ NELSONCO N STR U CT.COM NOTES: 1. THERE ARE WOODED AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING PORTIONS OF THE WOODED AREAS, PER IOWA CITY CODE FOR HSS, A MINIMUM OF 50% GO THE EXISTING WOODlAND5 MUST BE PRESERVED. RS -s WOODLAND PRESERVATION CALCULATION AREA(SFI PERCENTAGE DISTURBEDWOODIAND 426,780 32% BUFFER(50'WIOE) 215,791 1T% '1 PRESERVEDWOODIAND 682,493 sl% WOODLAND (PRIOR TO OEVELOPME" 1,325,064 100% 'I 2. TREES ARE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: LOCATION COUNT SHEET STREETTREFS 113 L1.00 LOT1 70 L3.00 TOTAL 203 1 LEGEND: AREA (SF) SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR INDEX —IOU — 100 CONTOUR INTERMEDIATE — 101 — WO FENCE'. MMWIRE!—�— 5,892 G STREAMCENTERUNE — — SIGN 49,340 r CONSTRURION AMA OVID TOTAL 1 426,780 \ � w 0 TREE REMOVAL UMUS AT EWE z m x OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT E_ -- SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WWDNNOPRESFAVATION IMPACTEDWOODWND PROPWEDIOME O REFER TO LANDSCAPE PIAN APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW JOHN BEASLEY 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM IMPACTED QUANTITIES: WOODLANDS LOCATION AREA (SF) 5,031 B 61,572 C 108,575 D 2,135 E 40,474 F) 5,892 G 144,485 H 9,276 U 49,340 r TOTAL 1 426,780 Ems/ / ` ^ 581154 32'11 6)95f �Q O I I 1 i i 1 y.A \26 975IF 26 A I 25� 5 D) At 1 �All, qe OUTLOT B YS I 44 AC BP AC x'11, 2STYF 23 X35 �O,,, I 22 �; 21 _ 36 O OAF19 20 19 Z / i0 37T \17 38 11 2E' IF 39 J �D /4Q / ! ��, 41 y 42 2 IX7MSF o3C 5255F 4 I I I 1D,5195F ptn4 I 6 D33M IF I 1 ( 059AC Q 2SF =6bfi0s VALID,0.3M 2 IX7MSF o3C 5255F 4 I I I 1D,5195F ptn4 I 6 D33M IF I I 1 ( Q 1 �Zm C /�AFT W 1 OH r F F \ � w 0 IIIIIIIIIIIII�Z� z m x E_ a u Q �o IJ 'Y` C= z z I w � I 3 0 g 3 to 3 3 } ? > a c ( 1 s O Sf 2 F w N I 1 E� J V1 Q 1 0 s0 lOD e L a e y S o I RIC I O i a i i Off\� i LD LD 1 o 0 5 o y, s t', ❑ ?� ?� rc t I I 1 ( Q 1 W C /�AFT W 1 F lid w 0 z z m x E_ a u Q �o IJ z z I w g I r a a W to I } ? > a c ( 1 s O Sf 2 F w N I 1 "y Guzw J V1 Q 1 I Q 1 W C /�AFT W F 0 z m x La a u Q �o w a3 z z �O o W to I cz0 I sNEETnuMREq: C1.20 PRELIMINARYOPD AND APPLICANT I: G. JOSEPH CLARK APPLICANT I'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW 1R0 CONTOURINTERMEDIATE— 101 — 221 E. INGTON ST JOHN BEASLEY SENSITIVE AREAS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 3221 E.M MARKET ST —� CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMrtS IOWA CITY, IA 52245 DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICANT2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: �. -- SENSITIVE AREAS AREA NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE `n BLUE LINE 4REAM CORRI W R Q ATN:JACOB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DAL TONHICKODvTRAIL z = W i �aNa3 218 5TH AVE, STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 IOWA CITY/ IOWA DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 W Z lidw JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BOALTON@KMCLAW.COM LEGEND: I SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOURINDEX — 100 — 1R0 CONTOURINTERMEDIATE— 101 — lA4 FENCE: BARDWIPE 4.44 AC STREAM a NTEPUNE ----- ---- SIGN —� CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMrtS SILT FENCE : TREERWOVALUMMAttDGE 96.6B95t OFCONSERVARON FPSEMENT �. -- SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WETUND `n BLUE LINE 4REAM CORRI W R NOTES: 1. 1. SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE GRADING LIMITS AS SHOWN PRIOR TO ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. l � _ e - 1 I Lwin. ` 2�§ BS6AC /�� IA335f _ \\\ 2 a 31 b 32 2b�y 11R nsBssFv \� I%Xms 33 / \ w X34 _ 24 . 0 \ BRn 5F 35 \ W,514 SF OSIAC 1 11.6135F 37 1»�F 38 s 100' IJD BUFFER `\ 1 , \ �a ♦. I 40' manal H&m L npx I I _ / Pot / Kamm RDrL�T 40' STREAK DUFFER I I 1 I ' 40' / STREAM- lool BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER / / 4.44 AC _ �� 193StI5f —r 9A 8 7;F i : 9:R65F 96.6B95t ., i� t- a `n r Q 04132 — z = W i �aNa3 Q W Z lidw z za 1 \♦ g z_ N. A 21 9 £ 9 o E �1 ❑ Y i i j��j E a II � C1.30 1 Y] -- U AC O 3 3 J W 18,023BF .i r a a I z W 1 �, •`;,.,, 1 ..s p ~ w IES T 1 O w Z v �o 1 a sG LGD IF" SBF o s o 0 0.4 '„yi, e iwsE ego AE 42 manal H&m L npx I I _ / Pot / Kamm RDrL�T 40' STREAK DUFFER 2C I o.3 a24AC 255F 04 0 24 AZ 6 ME AC u„43Fi DO% I I 1 I ' 40' / STREAM- lool BUFFER WETLAND BUFFER / OUTLOTB / 4.44 AC _ �� 193StI5f —r 9A 2C I o.3 a24AC 255F 04 0 24 AZ 6 ME AC u„43Fi DO% I I 1 I ' � 1 w p �Zm � 9A 8 7;F K : 9:R65F 96.6B95t 2C I o.3 a24AC 255F 04 0 24 AZ 6 ME AC u„43Fi DO% I I f I I I 1 I ' � 1 w p �Zm � I I �m K > O i� t- a `n r 6 04132 — z = W i �aNa3 Q W Z lidw z za 1 \♦ g z_ U X0 Us 9 £ 9 o E �1 ❑ Y i i s E a II � C1.30 O 3 3 J W I r a a I z W x 1 ..s p ~ w I 0 1 O w Z v �o 1 a sG LGD IF" o s o 0 0 I I f I I I 1 I ' � 1 w p � I I K > O i� t- a `n x 6 a J z = W i �aNa3 Q W Z lidw z za 1 \♦ g z_ U c 9 9 £ 9 o E �1 ❑ Y i i s E a II � C1.30 O J W I I I f I I 1 I ' � 1 w p I I K > O i� t- a `n x W 0 Q a J z = W i �aNa3 Q W Z lidw z za z I i II F-�5 II I � C1.30 O J W I r a a I z W x 1 ..s p ~ w a 1 O w Z v �o 1 1 w p K > O i� t- a `n x W 0 Q a J z = W i �aNa3 Q W Z i z za i W I SXEFTNUMBEq: C1.30 CONCEPT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES IOWA CITY, IOWA UPDATED APRIL 29, 2021 H 1 ` _ N. 182 IFNI I N.1STA ENUE v > . A IF I IF I i �i II LEGEND: PARK DEDICATION 0 CONSERVATION EASEMENT / i �j 28 1 D , K,ONSERVAT 4 7f9 If E EVEN `—_ �, 37 32 ry 1 ,� 33 ' 24 3 1 1 11 0 " \ I IF If 35 r F' \ >64 \ , \36 IF 2 AL\ 37 —_ so �o 191,374 IF Z F - OAK KNOLL J I PROJECT DATA: ENTRANCE 6 / /q TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 48.75 ACRES RIGHT -OF -WAV DEDICATION 4.39 ACRES 9.0% ? PARK DEDICATION AREA 14.02 ACRES 28.8% CONSERVATION AREA 4.44 ACRES 9.1% < u w Z f O IIII cl STREET LENGTH 3,148 FEET - / SINGLE -LOADED FRONTAGE 2,234 FEET 71.0% oU J Z = LEGEND: PARK DEDICATION 0 CONSERVATION EASEMENT / i �j 28 1 D , K,ONSERVAT 4 7f9 If E EVEN `—_ �, 37 32 ry 1 ,� 33 ' 24 3 1 1 11 0 " \ I IF If 35 r F' \ >64 \ , \36 IF 2 AL\ 37 —_ so �o 1W Z F - UI 6 < Q } OC a ? > FAR IF } rIV s 2 I SFORIES�412 91 STORY I 4STORIES VI �rT�_ CONSERVATION k}0 \\ �\ EASEMENT_ \�"-^ v OUTLOT B� 13 11 lU ,\D. ,\r E 33; III 42- ilq - ,I� 7 IF / v I _ I r l , ` \, tel- � • � ? i` 2 0IFAC 61Qb925F / EXISTING _ T. TREE LINE IF F IF i T I ----_ --- --59. ,. DTA --' ` LKIfING I I J RAIL r¢t 1/ I I 1 1 A01 Nfcl TRAIL 0 so �o 1W Z F - 6 < Q } OC a ? > a } s 2 F w u w Z f O IIII cl w Z Z F - 6 < Q } OC a ? > a } s 2 F w u w Z f O IIII cl - a UIR IF V E- Z 6 W cl oU J Z = a3 �g s - O U U Z t o c=0 00 •HEFT NUMBER: 02.00 STREET TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE ID 4b. WrANIW COMMON NAME BOOT SPACING RAV 3 WUWINMhn"ft 11Be A rvn/uSHOWN VOLONCHRUI � � mB i o w MTVIA55 N l I I I 1 I 1 1 r se�E FTNOMBEB: L1.00 w Z a�5 N � � 6 o w J Q i OC g a W Z > a } W u w Z f �o _ 2 a EWiI � l7 FTNOMBEB: L1.00 Z W 6 W W _ �g a� J z W W r a s u 0 Z G v 2 :� N FTNOMBEB: L1.00 GENERAL LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES: 01 CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OFANY WORK, CONTACT IOWA ONE CALL (1-800-292-8989) AT LEAST48 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING. REPAIR DAMAGE TO UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IMMEDIATELY. G2 PRIORTO PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION, THE LANDSCAPEOR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE PLANT LOCATIONS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF PROPOSED PLANT LOCATIONS LISTED ON PLAN MAY BE REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL INTERFERENCE WITH EXISTING OR RELOCATED UTILITIES OR IMPROVE MAINTENANCE CONDITIONS. 03 PRI O R TO INSTALLATION, ALL TREE PLANTING LOCATIONS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE DEUNEATED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PROJ ECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CONTACTTHE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE ONE WEEK PRIOR TO ANTICIPATED PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION DATE FOR FINAL LAYOUT APPROVAL. 04 ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL AT LEAST MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE"AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" (ANSI Z60.1 -LATEST EDITION), 05 PLANT QUANTITIES ARE FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. DRAWINGS SHALL PREVAIL WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. 06 NO PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBSTITUTED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 07 BED PREPARATION AND MULCHING NOTES: IMPORTED TOPSOIL, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE: FERTILE, FRIABLE, NATURAL TOPSOIL, WITH A CLAY CONTENT NOT EXCEEDING 30% AND ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT NOT LESS THAN 5% FREE FROM LUMPS, COARSE SANDS, STONES, ROOTS, STICKS, AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL, WITH ACIDITY RANGE OF BETWEEN Ph 6.0 and 5.8. 08 PLANTING SOIL: PLANTING SOIL (i.e. BACKFILL AREAS AROUND ROOT BALLS AS SHOWN ON TREEISHRUB INSTALLATION DETAIL) SHALL BE AMENDED, THOROUGHLY MIX 4 PARTSTOPSOIL,1 PART COMPOST,1 PARTSAND. TOPSOIL SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED WITHIN THE NOTE ABOVE. COMPOST SHALL BE FINELY SCREENED GRADED TO PASS SIEVE AS FOLLOWS: -MINIMUM OF 85% BEING 1/4" OR SMALLER (DRY BASIS RESULT). -MINIMUM OF 70% BEING 5/32" OR SMALLER (DRY BASIS RESULT(. -WITH CLUMPS OR PARTICLES 3/4" DIAMETER OR GREATER. SAND SHALL BE C33 WASHED CONCRETE SAND, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 09 UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALLGRASS/PERENNIAL MASSINGS ARETO BE EVENLYSPACED IN TRIANGULAR PATTERN ARRANGEMENT. 10 PRIORTO MULCHING ALL PLANING BED AREAS, APPLY COMMERCIALGRADE PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL), PER MANUFACTURE'S DmECTIONS,TO ALL PLANTING BEDS. 11 PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN ALLTREE PLANTING BEDS. 12 PROVIDE 2"DEPTH MIN. OFSHREDDED HARDWOOD AND/OR RIVER ROCK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB/ORNAMENTAL GRASS/PERENNIAL BEDS. 13 PROVIDE ALL TREES WITH A MINIMUM 3" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH RINGS FOR TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM SIX FOOT IS') DIAMETER AND CONTAIN SPADE EDGING AT MULCH RING EDGE 14 PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION, DO NOTALLOW ADDITION OFTOPSOIL, PLANTING SOIL OR MULCHTO DETER POSITIVE DRAINAGE OR TO CREATE AREA OF LOCALIZED PONDING. 15 NURSERY TAGS SHALL BE LEFT ON PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS COMPLETED THE INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. 16 CONTAINER GROWN STOCK SHALL HAVE THE CONTAINER REMOVED AND. THE ROOT BALL CUTTHROUGH THE SURFACE IN TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. 17 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND. ALLROOTWRAPPING MATERIAL MADE OF SYNTHETICS OR PLASTICS SHALL BE REMOVED ATTIME OF PLANTING. 18 AS NEEDED, STAKE ALL NEWLY PLANTED TREES RELATIVE TO WIND EXPOSURE. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SET PLUMB TO GROUND AND FACED FOR. BEST APPEARANCE. AS NECESSARY, PRUNE DEAD BRANCHES OR THOSE THAT COMPROMISE APPEARANCE AND STRUCTURE TO A MAX OF 1/3 THE PLANT. 19 CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER AND MAINTAIN ALL SODDED AREAS AS WELL AS ALL PLANTS UNTIL GROUND FREEZES. MAINTENANCE INCLUDES WEEDING, MULCHING, AND OTHER NECESSARY RELATED OPERATIONS UNTIL INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. INITIAL ACCEPTANCE 15 CONSIDERED TO BE THE DATE AT WHICH PLANTING AND MULCHING, ETC., PER LANDSCAPE PLAN, HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE 20 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN VIGOROUS GROWING CONDITIONS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM DATE OF INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. 21 ALL PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE DEAD OR IN AN UNHEALTHY OR UNSIGHTLY STATE ARE REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COSTTO THE OWNER FOR UP TO ONE YEAR OF INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. 22 SURFACE RESTORATION FOR ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TURF GRASS LAWN SOD, WITH AN ALTERNATE OPTION TO BE TURF GRASS LAWN SEED. ALL SEED& 500 APPLICATION NOTES ARE LISTED SEPARATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION& INSTALLATION. FOR ALL SURFACE RESTORATION, PLANTING PRACTICES, AND ANY OTHER LANDSCAPING WORK NOT ADDRESSED VIA MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW IOWA SODAS SPECIFICATIONS DIVISION 09: SITE WORK AND LANDSCAPING OF IOWA. SOD/SEED APPLICATION NOTES: 01 IF TURF GRASS LAWN SEED ALTERNATE 15 USED IN UEU OF SOD, ALL SEEDING APPLICATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY UNITED SEEDS INC, OR APPROVED EQUAL 02 ALL TURF GRASS LAWN AREAS, WHETHER SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ARE TO BE PLANTED AND INSTALLED AS PER THE TECHNICAL BULLETIN' FOR'SOD GROWER II KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLEND' PROVIDED BY UNITED SEEDS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. TECHNICAL BULLETIN FOR'SOD GROWER it KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLENO' CAN BE FOUND ON THE UNITED SEEDS WEBSITE: www.untedseeds.com 83 ALL TU RF GRASS SOD TO BE OF THE SAM E PERFOR MANCE QUALITY AND SPECIES TYPE OF TH E'SOD GROWER II KENTUCKY BLU EGRASS BLEND' PROVIDED BY UNITED SEEDS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLUEGRASS VARIETIES SHALL INCLUDE: 'CONCERTO', 'NO BLUE% rBEYON D', AND 'EVEREST'. CONTACT INFO: United Seeds Inc. 1800 Dixon Ave, Suite A Des Moines, IA 50316 Ph: 1-800.365-6674 Web: www.unitedseeds.com STAKING NOTES: TREE & SHRUB PLANTING NOTES: 00 TREE STAKING SHALL ONLY BE USED IF NOTED, IN HIGH WIND AREAS, OR AREAS OF HEAVY ADJACENT PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 01 STAKING WIRE THROUGH RUBBER HOSE SET LOOSE TO ALLOW FOR TRUNK TAPER AND DETRIMENTAL GROWTH. TREE SHOULD ALLOW LIMITED MOVEMENT. 02. STEEL FENCE POST STAKE DRIVEN INSIDE MULCH RING DIAMETER. DRIVE STAKES V-0" INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL BELOW ROOTBALL. 03 REMOVE WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP ONCE PLACED INTO PLANTING HOLE. REMOVE ALL SISAL AND SYNTHETIC TWINE. 04 TRUNK FLARE SHOULD BE EXPOSED BEFORE DETERMINING PLANTING HOLE DEPTH. PLANT TREE WITH TRUNK FLARE 1-2" MAXIMUM ABOVE ORIGINAL GRADE, AVOID PLANTING TREE TOO DEEPLY. 05 PLANTING HOLE TO BE AT M INIMUM 3 TIMES TH E WI DTH OF FOOTBALL AT SOIL SURFACE, SLOPING TO THE WIDTH OF R00T BALL AT BASE. PLANTING HOLE WIDTH NEAR SURFACE 15 I NCREASED TOS TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOTBALL WHEN SOILS ARE HIGHLY COMPACTED OR HEAVY IN CLAY CONTENT. 06 .SCARIFY PLANTING HOLE TO HELP ELIMINATE THE CREATION OF A 501L INTERFACE. 07 PLACE ROOTBALL ON COMPACTED& LEVELED SO BGRADE. 08 REMOVE EXIST' NG SOI L FROM EXCAVATED PLANTING PIT AND REPLACE WITH PLANTING SOIL WHILE BACKFIW NG, WORK PLANTING SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL TO MINIMIZE LARGE AIR POCKETS AND ENSURE BETTER VERTICAL SUPPORT. 09 AVOI D MOUNDI NG MU LCH& MAKI NG CONTACT WITH TRU N C FORM 2-3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING SAUCER TO HELP HOLD WATER DURING ESTABLISHMENT. DIAMETER OF MULCH AREA SHOO LD BE KEPT CLEAR OF GRASS, WEEDS, ETC. TO REDUCE COMPETITION WITH TREE ROOTS. 10 UNDISTURBED SOIL. 11 ONLY LIGHTLY PRUNE AND REMOVE DAMAGED OR DEAD BRANCHES. 12 SPADE EDGING, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. 13 REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANT SPACING, LOCATIONS. 14 6" MINI MUM WIDER HOLE THAN CONTAINER ON ALL SIDES. w N J_ Z F- a N F � W J Q } K a Z>_ a } a 0O 2 F VW U luel LO o f 2 a uwi �l7 L1.10 N J_ a F w 0 2 a luel LO o 2 F o L) p aJ w Z z a W 3 w � F tzw w � W K CI ZG a 9 F/ ! ° N L1.10 [ I IUTLOr B 4.44 AC [ 193,577 SF 1 1 II I� II I / / � O 3 GD 0 / f 0° 0 / O , TC / 1 CR 2] PO IT t CG I O ° CTC BMXP C O / 0 3 G 0 or 0 I 0 1 IV O`IV 2pT U B8 ! 2 PA �,0 ° c t DK aTtE nom I- 5— O Ir 1 RL BL 1 AG O 1 MS O 9 WF ,MG O GR L 0 01('I <a I ] PS O I t 2CR 20M 9 MXP- - ! _ 1 WF w 1 tac I �¢ Iv O r2CR I ° 3GC I 3CG 0I ITT I (�O � 1 c I TI 1 1 2TC % POR I / 1 PA 3AG 1 Co t t 1 PA ! l II 2CR £ I PMA � II I I� V ,a st -. REFER TR ET T�111 77 0 0 _-- - - ,, \ — 218 m 9 TV y m 10, 1 1 i° 3]JH101 zoo LI FOR � i99ECIES LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY SETBACK WATER TELECOM GAS ELECTRIC SANITARYSEWER STORM SEWER EXISTING EASEMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCING EXISTING CONTOUR TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT I /_ �� EVERGREEN TREE \ 0 ORNAMENTALTREE TALL FESCUE/ SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE MIX genus [landscape architects] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES,IA 50309 T 515 286 1010 WWW.GENUS- .COM On T T W Z < v7 � IT IT O - 995 - m11m11m11m OSHADETREE (DooSHRUB I ¢ PERENNIAL + TURFGRASS PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY SETBACK WATER TELECOM GAS ELECTRIC SANITARYSEWER STORM SEWER EXISTING EASEMENT TREE PROTECTION FENCING EXISTING CONTOUR TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT I /_ �� EVERGREEN TREE \ 0 ORNAMENTALTREE TALL FESCUE/ SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE MIX genus [landscape architects] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES,IA 50309 T 515 286 1010 WWW.GENUS- .COM On W Z < v7 � a O Q J z ¢ ¢ u Y Z w > 2 d z r Ej wz <O E: W l7 i L3.00 PLANTING NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO PLANTING AND SHALL REPORT ANY CONFLICTS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES. 4. IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE NUMBER OF PLANTS ON PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 5. ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ANSI Z 60.1, OR LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO THE A.S.N.S. 6. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTE PLANT MATERIAL TYPE, SIZE, AND/OR QUANTITY. 8. STAKE LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED PLANTING FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PLANTING. 9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO OPERATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PER PLAN. ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 10. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUS TO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING SOIL. 11. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, TREES TO BE CENTERED IN PLANTING AREAS. 12. TO AVOID DISRUPTION TO EXISTING TREES, HAND DIGGING REQUIRED WITHIN DRIP LINE OF TREES. NO TREE ROOTS OVER 1" IN DIAMETER ARE TO BE CUT. 13. PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH, NATURAL COLOR, IN ALL PLANT SAUCERS AND PLANTING BEDS TO A 3 -INCH MAXIMUM DEPTH. APPLY PRE -EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 14. NEW TREES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PLANT BEDS, SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET AWAY FROM PLANT BED. 15. NO TREES OR SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN 5' FROM ANY UTILITY SERVICE VALVE, BASED ON ANTICIPATED TRUNK SIZE. OVERSTORY TREES QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 2 WF ABIES CONCOLOR WHITE FIR 6'-8' HT B&B AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 6 CR CARPINUS CAROLINIANA AMERICAN HORNBEAM 2" CAL. B&B 2" CAL. 6 CO CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2" CAL. B&B B&B MULTI -STEM 8 GT GLIDETSIA TRICANTHOS'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST 2" CAL. B&B 7 11 GD GYMNOCLADUS DIOCUS'ESPRESSO' ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE 2" CAL. B&B SR 8 MA MACCKIA AMURENSIS AMUR MAAKIA 2" CAL. B&B VX 6' 1 NS NYSSA SYLVANTICA BLACK TUPELO 2" CAL. B&B VX 4.5' 5 PA PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE 6'-8' HT B&B 4'X 4' 3 PG PICEA CLAUCA'DENSATA' BLACK HILLS SPRICE 6'-8' HT B&B TX 3' 3 PS PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE 6'-8' HT B&B 2' X 3' 3 QC QUERCUS COCCINEA SCARLET OAK 2" CAL. B&B 4'X 6' 4 QM QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2" CAL. B&B 10 TC TSUGA CANADENSIS EASTERN HEMLOCK 6'-8' HT B&B CC SHRUBS QTY ORNAMENTAL TREES BOTANICAL COMMON QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 5 AG AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 6 CG CRATEGUS CRUS-GALLI VAR. INERMIS THORNLESS COCKSPIR HAWTHRON 2" CAL. B&B 2 MS MAGNOLIA X SOULANGEANA SAUCER MAGNOLIA 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 12 MXP MALUS'PRAIRIE FIRE' PRAIRIE FIRE CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 7 MXS MALUS'SPRING SNOW' SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 3 SR SYRINGA RETICULATA SSP. RETICULATA'IVORY SILK' IVORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2" CAL. B&B SHRUBS QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT MATURE SIZE (HT. X WIDTH) 23 BB CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS BUTTONBUSH #1 CONT. 6'X 5' 175 DK DIERVILLA WODIAK ORANGE' KODIAK ORANGE DIERVILLA 18" HT CONT. 4'X 4' 6 HV HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA WITCH HAZEL 6' HT CONT 10' X 8' 16 BB HYDRANGEA PAN ICULATA'ILVOBO' PP#22,782 BOBO HARDY HYDRANGEA #3 CONT. ITX 4' 7 IV ITEA VIRGINICA LITTLE HENRY SWEETSPIRE #3 CONT. TX 3' 69 JH JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS'HUGHES' HUGHES JUNIPER #3 CONT. VX 6' 146 PO PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NINEBARK #1 CONT VX 4.5' 3 RL RHODODENDRON X'LANDMARK' LANDMARK RHODODENDRON #3 CONT. 4'X 4' 90 ST SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA'TOR' TOR SPIREA #3 CONT. TX 3' 3 BZ SPIRAEA MEDIA DOUBLE PLAY BLUE KAZOO SPIREA #3 ICONT. 2' X 3' 25 TD TAXUS X MEDIA'DENSIFORMIS' DENSE SPREADING YEW 48" HT CONT. 4'X 6' genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 W W W.GENUS-LA.COM w z z w a 0 zz x U LL O z 0 a UU w 0 N W a W J Q wcr_ �0 z Y GU w o— = a r) CL 0 a z J W a Z Q J CL N a W Q W U0 z W V) J ISHEETNUMBER: Uj L3.01 u PSWAX W N Lu a 0 z � w0 2 U J W W J W U L10 06 N W H Oz Z LU Ja CC U M z zH z z _ 'o W Q J ISHEETNUMBER: Uj L3.01 u PSWAX W N Lu a 0 z � w0 2 U J W EDGE OF PLANTING AREA Q SPACING \ / I a y PLANT CENTER SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS ROOTBALL 3116" x 4" STEEL EDGING, GALVANIZED UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE NOT TO SCALE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OVERSTORY TREE PLANTING SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING n SHRUB PLANTING SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 W W W.GENUS-LA.COM w Q 0 w z Z Q S u 0 0 z 0 a a V H w w N 0 to N W z ZN o6 Q J m N W to cn Y Z0 O Q of SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH } 0 z z GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE Ur z U y CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. U O z j m SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, J 2" THICKNESS w Q 3 FINISH GRADE ? z 3 3 z_w0LU un z O z i V% a O G U BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OVERSTORY TREE PLANTING SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING n SHRUB PLANTING SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 W W W.GENUS-LA.COM w Q 0 w z Z Q S u 0 0 z 0 a a V H w w N W z Q o6 Q N W 0- cn Y J O Q of L } W Q Ur z Q Q U z j m } J Q } Cr Q= cI � O U V) z_w0LU un z O z i V% a O G U w z x D'W (n z d N 0 n= u J ISHEETNUMBER: LU 0- L3.02 = U J LU O1 rl 0 0 lV J < Q L Ur z W >a` ULj J Q } Cr Q= cI � O U V) z_w0LU H Z z i x J (n N � J ISHEETNUMBER: LU 0- L3.02 = U J LU O1 rl 0 0 lV .p SETBACKS FRONT 15' SIDE 7' REAR 20' 85 LOT 10 rl'eA" LOT SIZE 24,769 SF BUILDABLE AREA 5,600 SF LOT 11 LOT SIZE 23,821 SF BUILDABLE AREA 5,600 SF LOT 12 LOTSIZE 22,874$F BUILDABLE AREA 5,600 SF 88' LOT 13 LOTSIZE 17,145 SF BUILDABLE AREA 6,860 SF CONSERVATION LOT 14 EASEMENT LOT SIZE 22,063 SF 4,760 BUILDABLE AREA 4,760 SF ISOD \ 100 m \ 1� N� /Q \ m 100 \ 1 , \ � m N � � 9 \ 0.59 AC MNSULTANTS 25,716 SF BUIwDABLE AREA E%HIBIT �W29- OO96 lom 0429u21 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES lOF4 W W W.MIOM CON.COM 1131915196220 pf am eslgn IVI- umey ee 5 - m a e fea x 1 . wg Pram esign rvi- umey ee s - UU110alae Area txnioit.awg SETBACKS - FRONT 15' 51 DE 7'REAR 20' LOT 35 f790A LOT SIZE 21,389 SF BUILDABLE AREA 4,900 SF LOT 16 LOT SIZE 20,7165F BUILDABLE AREA 5,040 SF 90' LOT 17 LOTSIZE 20,042$F BUILDABLE AREA 4,770 5F e N LOT 38 LOTSIZE 19,3685F BUILDABLE AREA 4,770 SF 90 LOT 19 -SI 90, LOT Z E 18,6945E BUILDA BUILDABLE AREA 5,040 5E LOT 20 LOTSIZE 18,020 SF ut BUILDABLE AREA 5,040 5F 90 90 CONSERVATION EASEMENT w 90 89 N _ 85 85' a 25 50 PRNEA- AREA E%HIBIT W29- OO96N 0429u21 MINSULTANTS IOMBUIwDABLE w .W IOM CON.COM 1(319) 5196220 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES 20F4 Pram esign rvi- umey ee s - UU110alae Area txnioit.awg 0.24AC \ S SETBACKS 10,624 SF FRONT I6' / SIDE 7' REAR 20' \ / LOT 21 \/ pq LOT SIZE 17,3475E SS BUILDABLE AREA 4,901 SF / qS. LOT 22 FO—BU ILDAE 4,761 SF / BUILDABLE AREA 4,7615E LOT 23 / 9 E 1.-18,2735E BUILDA / BUILOAeLE AREA 3,3335E o/ 'p6• 5°j LOT 24 LOT 1ZZE 18,839 SF BUILDABLE AREA 7,690 SF O \ LOT 25 O \ LOT —SI 2E 20,409 SF \ BUILDABLE AREA 5,0815E 8q \ \ 8q 0 0 • o 88 86' CONSERVATION EASEMENT n n 85 r MNSULTANTS IO A. 25 50 BUIwDABLE AREA E%HIRIT �W29-2 O-O96ELCH a,v` 0429u21 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES 30F4 w .W IOM CON.COM 11319151.e2E0 pf am esign rvi- uwey ee 5 - UU110alae Area txnioit.awg --- Awa wz4 i � 24) 4) W2 —CW2 )�C W2 95 115' w 0 25 50 w J � 92' 120 32 m 0.27 AC / CONSERVATION / \ 11,6795F / / \ 78 EASEMENT \ 78 33 \ / 0.23 AC 9,959 SF n ro 9 SETBACKS \ z• FRONT 15' C V b~ SIDE 7' REAR 20' SIDE ON SCOTT 40' / LOT 26 LOT SIZE 19,300 SF / BUILDABLE AREA 5,306 SF 56 9 m LOT 27 y LOT SIZE 26,9755F 9' BUILDABLE AREA 6,560 SF LOT 28 LOT SIZE 24,788 SF BUILDABLE AREA 6,0265F LOT 29 LOT SIZE 24,4135E BUILDABLE AREA 6,1063E LOT 30 LOT SIZE 35,9395F WELCH BUILDABLE AREA 6,112 SF XIME .�. OM BUILDABLE AREA EXHIBIT 20-0194 LOT32 0429u21 LOT SIZE 15,8115E ACONSULTANTS 1 5 19 fiEEO HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES 4OF4 BUILDABLE AREA 6,758 SF W W W.WIIOMSON.COM 11319 pf am ealgp IVI- urvey ee 5 - m a e fea x i 1 . wg Janet E. Godwin Chief Executive Officer May 4, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Iowa City 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission Members: As Mr. Clark continues to work in good faith to address the concerns expressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission in the February 18th and March 18th Planning & Zoning Commission meetings, ACT is again writing to express our full support for Mr. Clark's development. As we communicated in our March 15th letter to the Planning & Zoning Commission, ACT believes the previous two plans presented by Mr. Clark met both the intent and spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan. Mr. Clark will be presenting a third revision to the plan at the May 6th Planning & Zoning Commission meeting that has incorporated City and community member feedback. This version of Mr. Clark's plan now has 15 fewer single-family lots that he originally proposed, and is gifting 14.02 acres of land to the City. Perhaps most importantly, this revised plan addresses 100% of the Commission's previously expressed concerns. Also, as we stated in our March 15th letter, ACT recently became aware that our land is being used as a de facto extension of Hickory Hill Park. Due to community member safety and potential liability concerns, ACT subsequently put up Private Property signs to make it clear to all that the land is, in fact, not part of Hickory Hill Park. Unfortunately, our signs and fencing continue to be regularly removed and damaged. Even more disappointing is that large numbers of people continue to use our land, completely ignoring the large posted signs indicating the land is private property. Within the past two weeks, areas of our land have been cleared by trespassers - presumably to make it even easier to access our property. ACT is a responsible landowner working with a reasonable and accommodating developer. Mr. Clark and his plan continue to have our full support notably because the plan adheres to the guidelines provided by the Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan. We are optimistic that this third plan revision will be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission, and we look forward to moving forward in the approval process. Sincerely, Janet E. Godwin Chief Executive Officer cc: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Bruce Teague, Mayor Joe Clark 500 ACT Drive P.O. Box 168 Iowa City, Iowa 52243-0168 0anet.godwin jnact.orq www.act.org From: Russo, Andrew F To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: [External] Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 05/06/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Saturday, May 1, 2021 11:41:58 AM Attachments: imaae001.ona imaae002.pnno imaae003.ona imaae004.pnno imaae005.ona Thanks Ray. I would still like to encourage the committee to explore the possibility of Outlot B being added to the park. This will ensure public access and provide a buffer for wildlife. There are some nice old trees in that ravine and it seems likely that there could be expansion into the remaining open space in the ravine to the east of Outlot B when that land comes up for development. A recommendation from Planning and Zoning on this issue would set the stage for a discussion with Parks and Rec. Thank you. Andy Russo From: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Date: Friday, April 30, 2021 at 4:21 PM To: "Parker, Adam G" <adam-parker@uiowa.edu>, "Weis, Adam J" <adam+ weis@uiowa.edu>, "'allisonjaynes@gmail.com"' <allisonjaynes@gmail.com>, "Russo, Andrew F" <andrew-russo@uiowa.edu>, "Synan, Ann" <ann-synan@uiowa.edu>, "'asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com"' <asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com>, "'b3n.berger@gmail.com"' <b3n.berger@gmail.com>, "'bamcquillen@gmail.com"' <bamcquillen@gmail.com>, "'brian.lehmann@icloud.com"' <brian.lehmann@icloud.com>, "'hickoryhiker@gmail.com"' <hickoryhiker@gmail.com>, "'clbuckingham@gmail.com"' <clbuckingham@gmail.com>, "'cjkohrt@gmail.com"' <cjkohrt@gmail.com>, "'darcy128@aol.com"' <darcy128@aol.com>, `dpurdy2@gmail.com"' <dpurdy2@gmail.com>, "'liztracey@gmail.com"' <liztracey@gmail.com>, "'emilyakim05@gmail.com"' <emilyakim05@gmail.com>, "'emily.schacht@gmail.com"' <emily.schacht@gmail.com>, `eric.gidal5@gmail.com"' <eric.gidal5@gmail.com>, "'durian.erin@gmail.com"' <durian.erin@gmail.com>, "Boos, Florence" <florence-boos@uiowa.edu>, "'buengerg@gmail.com"' <buengerg@gmail.com>, "Molitor, Hannah R" <hannah-molitor@uiowa.edu>, "'Hannah.Rapson@RaymondJames.com"' <Hannah.Rapson@RaymondJames.com>, "'heather.w.mcknight@gmail.com"' <heather.w.mcknight@gmail.com>, "'hbschofield@gmail.com"' <hbschofield@gmail.com>, "'perkins.i.t@gmail.com"' <perkins.i.t@gmail.com>, "'jackiehockett@gmail.com"' <jackiehockett@gmail.com>, "'jameshirsch@gmail.com"' <jameshirsch@gmail.com>, "'j.k.brad bury@gmail.com"' <j.k.brad bury@gmail.com>, "'jasnap23@yahoo.com"' From: Carol deProsse To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Development Date: Saturday, May 1, 20215:06:45 PM Please put me on your mailing list, but you need to know that I am totally opposed. This email is from an external source. From: Mark Renshaw on behalf of markrenshaw(cibme.com Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 05/06/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Wednesday, May 5, 20212:26:35 PM I Ftl$F{ To: Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission Cc: Iowa City Council I am writing to again oppose the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres (South of Scott Blvd and West of 1st Avenue, Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park), by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension, (Case No. REZ20-0016). I have been an Iowa City resident and homeowner since 1999. My property is located within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning. The zone change proposed is not consistent with the comprehensive plan for the area. The proposed rezoning and development plan does not comply with the NE District Plan and the Comprehensive Plan set forth by the City of Iowa City, and should therefore be denied. The original plans specify low-density development in order to minimize the impact of on Hickory Hills Park. If this space is to be developed, the original plan and low-density zoning designation must be followed. The proposed zone change is not consistent with surrounding uses. Hickory Hills Park is an extraordinary and unique urban park that should be protected. A senior living/nursing home facility of this magnitude is not suitable for this location and is inconsistent with the use of the surrounding area. This proposed plan would engender severe traffic, noise, and light pollution to the surrounding park area, and is a detriment to the public good Please denv this rezonine and development plan. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Mark Renshaw 72 Hickory Heights Lane Iowa City, Iowa 52245 From: Svnan. Ann To: Raymond Heitner Cc: Anne Russett; Svnan, William J Subject: Hickory Trail Rezoning: Planning and Zoning Meeting May 6, 20021 Date: Wednesday, May 5, 20214:03:05 PM Mr. Heitner, Would you please pass along our comments to the Planning and Zoning Commissioners? Thank you. Ann Synan Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners: We were appreciative that at two public meetings on February 18, 2021 and March 18, 2021, the motion to approve the rezoning off of Hickory Trail of approximately 48.75 acres from Interim Development — Single Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/R-S-S) -- was denied by the Planning and Zoning Commissioners by votes of 0-7 and 1-6. Now we find ourselves this week, with yet another public meeting to discuss this same proposed rezoning — and the plan looks very similar to the original one. We, like many who have been involved with the discussions of the proposed Hickory Trail Rezoning, are asking the question, "How many times do the Planning and Zoning Commissioners and the community have to discuss a developer's plan that has been rejected twice ?" A comment has been repeatedly expressed previous meetings on this proposed rezoning, that Iowa City planning staff wisely created a blueprint years ago for the NE District — a plan that did an excellent job of balancing development and buffering Hickory Hill Park. That plan wisely called for the future development of single family homes in the area off of Hickory Trail near the Park— nQLthe development of_an enormous care facility spreading over nine acres, with 90 outdoor parking spaces and jutting up three stories high (with the appearance of four stories in some parts) --ten feet taller than the neighboring Hickory Pointe Condominium) — plunked next to Hickory Hill Park and in the middle of a neighborhood of single family residential homes. How does this purposed plan balance development and provide a buffer for the Park? How does this purposed plan balance development and provide a buffer for the Park? I think of some of the comments that you as commissioners made at the last meeting: "If they have places in the community that that are sacred and valuable, they need to be proactive about taking care of that". "Once they do it, it can't be undone ... this is different from other projects... here it's not just the neighborhood, it's people all over the Iowa City area that use this park just to get away and once we take that away from them, they can't get it back". "Yes, this is private land and yes, it is going to be developed in some way, however there needs to be a better cohesion between the development and the community, the parks, and others and take a micro and macro look at this project". For the third, and what we hope will be the final time — please deny this revised proposed rezoning and allow the property to remain under low density, single family zoning -- not medium density, or low density single-family with a "planned development overlay". We entrust that you will do the right thing and take the appropriate steps to help preserve the integrity and serenity of Iowa City's Hickory Hill Park and the character of the Bluffwood and Hickory Heights neighborhoods. We appreciate your counsel and thank you for your consideration. Ann and Bill Synan 833 Cypress Court Iowa City From: Glenda Buenaer To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 05/06/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 11:12:35 PM Attachments: image001.ong image002.pno image003.rnQ image004.1ng_ image005.rng I Dear Mr. Heitner, Will you please forward my letter to the Planning and Zoning Commissioners? Thank you. I hope they have time to read it before tonight's meeting, which I cannot attend. Sincerely, Glenda Buenger 318 S. Lucas St. Dear Commissioners, I hope you receive and have time to consider these comments before tonight's meeting. This letter, of course, concerns the proposed development next to Hickory Hill Park. My concern lies with the western, or single family housing part, of the proposed project, and I will try to get straight to the point. During both of the public comment sessions held so far, Hickory Hill Park supporters (myself included) have championed a single -loaded street. The revised proposal employs a partly single -loaded street. But look at the comparison presented on p. 2 of the May meeting packet (Figs. 1 and 2). The project footprint is essentially the same, even if the condo is gone and part of the street has houses on only one side. There is not enough buffer to shield the park. It looks like about 75' between the street and the west park boundary. It looks like maybe 45' between the street and the park boundary on the south side of the proposed project. It's more buffer than we had before, but it is not enough buffer to protect the park from all the ills we've talked about at the previous two public hearings. An adequate buffer zone would measure more like 150-200 ft. There's not enough buffer in the current proposal because there are too many houses. I believe the suggestion was a single -loaded street that is single -loaded through its entirety. I don't know how many houses it takes to pay for a through street. Maybe there doesn't need to be a through street. I understand why the city doesn't like cul-de-sacs. But something different has got to give, here, than our public park! Maybe cul-de-sacs are less expensive to construct than through streets and the Northwest District Plan is not as outmoded as it seems. Maybe Mr. Clark could still realize a profit with fewer houses, albeit not as much profit as he would like to realize by crowding in 42 houses. Maybe ACT is asking too much money for the parcel. I'm not in a position to know where the squeeze is, but please encourage Mr. Clark to keep working on this problem of how to better give everyone what they want. Please don't sacrifice our park. There must be a way to develop the parcel that adequately protects the park. Let's give the developer more time to find that way. Thank you for considering my view. Sincerely, Glenda Buenger 318 S. Lucas St. Iowa City On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 4:22 PM Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitnernao iowa-city.org> wrote: All, The applicant for the Hickory Trail Estates rezoning has submitted a revised OPD Plan. This plan will be discussed at next week's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday, May 6th at 7pm. The meeting's agenda packet can be found here: https://www.icgov.org/city- aovernment/boa rds/pla n n i ng-and-zon i ng-com mission The Zoom link for the meeting can be found here: https:Hzoom.us/meeting/register/tJO12cugrrjkiG9VGc-jSUO9TYa8gybtnAT3 5y I've also attached the revised concept plan for your convenience. Please send me any correspondence you would like forwarded to the Commission. Thank you, Ray Heitner Associate Planner (he/him/his) 319.356.5238 ravmond-heitner(c�r� Iowa -city. org From: Messingham, Kelly To: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: [External] Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 05/06/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Thursday, May 6, 20212:24:40 PM Attachments: image001.ong mage002.pno image003.rng mage004.pnng_ image005.rng I Hi Ray, Thanks for sending this. I have been out of town but just looked over the plan and it seems like they did remove the small cul-de-sac on the north end and some of the western lots, but actually (inexplicably) moved the road farther west? I will try to compare at home before the meeting. Kelly Messingham From: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Sent: Friday, April 30, 20214:21 PM To: Parker, Adam G <adam-parker@uiowa.edu>; Weis, Adam J <adam-j-weis@uiowa.edu>; 'allisonjaynes@gmail.com' <allisonjaynes@gmail.com>; Russo, Andrew F <andrew- russo@uiowa.edu>; Synan, Ann <ann-synan@uiowa.edu>; 'asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com' <asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com>; 'b3n.berger@gmail.com' <b3n.berger@gmail.com>; 'bamcquillen@gmail.com' <bamcquillen@gmail.com>;'brian.lehmann@icloud.com' <brian.lehmann@icloud.com>; 'hickoryhiker@gmail.com'<hickoryhiker@gmail.com>; 'clbuckingham@gmail.com' <clbuckingham@gmail.com>;'cjkohrt@gmail.com' <cjkohrt@gmail.com>; 'darcy128@aol.com' <darcy128@aol.com>; 'dpurdy2@gmail.com' <dpurdy2@gmail.com>; 'liztracey@gmail.com' <liztracey@gmail.com>; 'emilyakim05@gmail.com' <emilyakim05@gmail.com>;'emily.schacht@gmail.com' <emily.schacht@gmail.com>; 'eric.gidal5@gmail.com'<eric.gidal5@gmail.com>;'durian.erin@gmail.com' <durian.erin@gmail.com>; Boos, Florence <florence-boos@uiowa.edu>; 'buengerg@gmail.com' <buengerg@gmail.com>; Molitor, Hannah R <hannah-molitor@uiowa.edu>; 'Hannah.Rapson@RaymondJames.com' <Hannah.Rapson@RaymondJames.com>; 'heather.w.mcknight@gmail.com' <heather.w.mcknight@gmail.com>; 'hbschofield@gmail.com' <hbschofield@gmail.com>;'perkins.i.t@gmail.com' <perkins.i.t@gmail.com>; 'jackiehockett@gmail.com' <jackiehockett@gmail.com>;'jameshirsch@gmail.com' <jamesh irsch@gmail.com>; J. k. brad bury@gmail,com' <j.k.brad bury@gmail.com>; 'jasnap23@yahoo.com' <jasnap23@yahoo.com>; 'jessemacfarlane@gmail.com' <jessemacfarlane@gmail.com>; 'kjrutherford0l@gmail.com' <kjrutherford0l@gmail.com>; 'moffitt.julie@gmail.com' <moffitt.julie@gmail.com>; 'karen.nichols@protonmail.com' <karen. nichols@proton mai l.com>; 'tomkatymclaughlin@gmail.com' <tomkatymclaughlin@gmail.com>; Messingham, Kelly <kelly-messingham@uiowa.edu>; 'kelly.teeselink@gmail.com' <kelly.teeselink@gmail.com>;'kelseyturnis@gmail.com' <kelseyturnis@gmail.com>;'Khris.Vickroy@mercer.com' <Khris.Vickroy@mercer.com>; Ryther, Krisanne E <krisanne-ryther@hawkeyefootball.com>; 'krinelil@hotmail.com' From: wobtj(cbmchsi.com To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 05/06/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Thursday, May 6, 20213:18:11 PM Attachments: imaae001.ona imaae002.pnna imaae003.ona imaae004.pnna imaae005.ona I Dear Ray Heitner, I still am apposed to the proposal to the construction of homes along the western side of the near Scott Blvd and vote to not allow this proposal to be accepted. Thank you! Sincerely yours, Tony Wobeter From: Raymond Heitner Sent: Friday, April 30, 20214:20 PM To: 'adam-parker@uiowa.edu' ; 'adam-j-weis@uiowa.edu' ; 'allisonjaynes@gmail.com' ; 'andrew- russo@uiowa.edu' ; 'ann-synan@uiowa.edu' ; 'asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com' ; 'b3n.berger@gmail.com' ; 'bamcquillen@gmail.com' ; 'brian.lehmann@icloud.com' ; 'hickoryhiker@gmail.com' ; 'clbuckingham@gmail.com' ; 'cjkohrt@gmail.com' ; 'darcyl28@aol.com' ; 'dpurdy2@gmail.com' ; 'liztracey@gmail.com' ; 'emilyakim05@gmail.com' ; 'emily.schacht@gmail.com' ; 'eric.gidal5@gmail.com' ; 'durian.erin@gmail.com' ; 'florence-boos@uiowa.edu' ; 'buengerg@gmail.com' ; 'hannah- molitor@uiowa.edu' ;'Hannah.Rapson@Raymondlames.com' ; 'heather. w.mcknight@gmail. com' ; 'hbschofield@gmail.com' ; 'perkins.i.t@gmail.com' ; 'jackiehockett@gmail.com' ; 'jameshirsch@gmail.com' ; 'j.k.bradbury@gmail.com' ; 'jasnap23@yahoo.com' ; 'jessemacfarlane@gmail.com' ; 'kjrutherford0l@gmail.com' ; 'moffitt.julie@gmail.com' ; 'karen.nichols@protonmail.com' ; 'tomkatymclaughlin@gmail.com' ; 'kelly-messingham@uiowa.edu' ; 'kelly.teeselink@gmail.com' ; 'kelseyturnis@gmail.com' ; 'Khris.Vickroy@mercer.com' ; 'krisanne-ryther@hawkeyefootball.com' ; 'krinelil@hotmail.com' ; 'knmorrow@gmail.com' ; 'laurajclaps@gmail.com' ; 'lauridi@hotmail.com' ; 'iheartsteakl21@gmail.com' ; 'libbysue.c@gmail.com' ; 'lilysmithjensen@gmail.com' ; 'loalbrecht@gmail.com' ; 'mms246@gmail.com' ; 'mgedlinske@gmail.com' ; 'markrenshaw@me.com' ; 'embenbear@gmail.com' ; 'hortgal@hotmail.com' ; 'mwinder73@yahoo.com' ; 'matthew.def@gmail.com' ; 'modemo403@gmail.com' ; 'maureen.russo.pt@gmail.com' ; 'nfootner@gmail.com' ; 'pholden@iastate.edu' ; 'phillip-lutgendorf@uiowa.edu' ; 'riley.gardam@gmail.com' ; 'robin.kopelman@gmail.com' ; 'roslynn-ellis-1@uiowa.edu' ; 'rukieb@gmail.com' ; 'rwestfa@yahoo.com' ; 'rsteinbron@hotmail.com' ; 'sragerl3@gmail.com' ; 'shea-jorgensen@uiowa.edu' ; 'shellycarpenterl216@gmail.com' ; 'sherrypardee@earthlink.net' ; 'stella.d.hart@gmail.com' ; 'susan- lutgendorf@uiowa.edu' ; 'susan-lehmann@uiowa.edu' ; 'susannahgkneal@gmail.com' ; 'tegallu@gmail.com' ; 'teresalmangum@gmail.com' ; 'thomaskdean@mchsi.com' ; 'wobtj@mchsi.com' ; 'veronica.bolinger@gmail.com' ; 'em253887@gmail.com' ; 'Bruce Tarwater' ; 'Carol Tyx' ; 'Karin McKeone' ; 'pat bowen' ; 'Brian Richman' ; 'Lauren Katalinich' ; 'likach92@gmail.com' ; 'davidjdeardorff@gmail.com' ; 'kwthiel@gmail.com' Cc: Anne Russett Subject: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 05/06/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda q •i^Y ,i {I� V ��. \ i I � � C , S-. `Ili r _ • pip - R. - •1 i f • s '40. , . �rdr Mo l` T. Y P y Y t RM 1' 9: WzZlEzzlor .I � W�Zz -s mom y _ t • Y� f 11yy Ao e Okla Q d K VR. � k AF a .I � W�Zz -s mom y _ t • Y� f 11yy Ao e Okla Q d K VR. � k AF a I i •� • t T• _.A JOIN, 1t It'll- r� =m• �. _ JRPW A `t 4 a OW4-.r s� - • • � ,do • 4 Ammmts�%w �4 h. 4 _ -,dft � — Ilk, !-` _� �" .saw_ � J► t K� y�:# Ile IN le tiv - " ' -'—•.. : ,� � _._"- `3- 'sem . . �'i° � I New ell lee Im - -.Nee IN Ile - It d _ lA•�e _ 'rY Neel ell let •A .�.:} •py .i. .. /aSV E,4ffi-f-__.Y.e�'�.CI�'a{V . r _ �r.'1... - . -.v. - _ ...e e � .. _ Ism p ..� X41 � v���P�rl ;a„�f y�ASO �,•- � Q rr .ar-= e t ' " 77 _• ,r,,F�Ii �r_ A Ml ...4�i.. �o'u 7 a+` . —` _ _ W, . gam. ..,.. ... .. _ vl dl r�; k 6 ff rl'r -,,rte .. _ . hlr•. .- 4no._ NN, k tOR IlIk _IN IN lV IN, mw \ - SIN, 'c_'y'Tv _ Y. _- _ Yom..., - r axl. mss•. Tt a Nelli id ary-'.`._= el lit - P F fjjdyyf 1 .ti,--- 4ikT'k.. •; �ra�x�, ,fir �_'”- -.:. - _ �•�lYa'-� '.s��,�� a.. .`.. ..�+a--" r .. l gs_�1 •, �.- r�'�f ,�,a��� 1, ���' 1 ,N-.a�d, - }� ..._t'r��-�s!-_R::r.r.'SYta.�-`.���•-�`_>aa� _ -• �• f. r� � _. _ _- _ .AWi/WJ.�1iM�� r5: 1 .a L A.Y i NO IN 4NNY,. L ,' y. Net,, r��{' Ir r I �.T 1 Y 1..'i T' .1 i 41.'�rY ''. .' % : !1 11 d /'/' 1 1 yll �'I'r' rA `,f 1�YI{ y1 l:\ ! ` Y ry j1 A q t\✓ '�tl_ (, YL rl' T e yj� ` Ir.1. -1 Np IN: L r::{ } 1 "1' r..Nr . �d., . T 111 1.. + r. f .� � f fin f ti ri AQ , , ., ,,n�, A 4 1,1 f M y., _r 1 i n' • / 'fl !, ito d 1 a Y, S t. ,4 r 't 1. l'. N 5 .M h �' r 1. 1 , , S1. 1 5i 1 u 1 I. t . r. !.r ... ! r., Ir ., .� -U, IJ�,tIA1"`�. ...4r. :t r'd,tJ.N4id11 a r�lfl�'.14i4 iwa. 4 - 1. m!%11L.x. LII ... ... .. ._ a...1'..1. Ift ,$�n.n. ,. mA _e .. .k {'M. ..11: .' rt„'�� „��r.x��e �l.. r. ' j 16 Idiom * : •',- :*f, - t - _ : . n .,... _ ♦ 'Q,/b Y .\\ar. /i A + �" \ Y 1 i'v w b �. i:.,�. Is t \': 't1'.. Y y 1 VAi, a ,,A 1 r. .w W', !' 1 t (� ,1 \ .: ;tiri�#1 ..,..,m+, _ M ttY"'•:,�ao,a. ,.W .,,. \ 7': fw. ', 1 r ~''<;11, ,'if �t, ,+d , .1 o i4'� .b.1�;a' .Yr ':NY , 9, �Vll. if�r', t£ 7'•, k' c �• 9 ",\ t.:1 1 a �2 >•'.:.a+v?.,,. j %V.,. .,J_e►r /J".uf r�' 1 a�,,�r'tyt `. 47f ,t. 4lYi I, �1n✓ 4f\ SIL r 1 " ,SIF' r1� M 11 1 .11. 'Q, `UIY;.'I r ,�`r w.. :. I int W' _., -. ... r:. �'Atir;��il? .',• L :„'.,. ,r. ,.��: ,.2'..:�'rh.. �!Y'��. Ji 4A1W'.. •.. ', .- � I \"'�r.:?• ,'4st •� , ,v r .'>... ,',. \y'l4, '„ .' '• hu..' .. :,. «ab,a-,1 .. A ,,c , .\. 6 .R r,.,a 71�F.4'_"1 • i)'C%,�41• .,a..: 11 ., i.. •� ”, : ' 1 .1. ,;; �• ,r ,.1 \'' rt: i4 bb(M �',n , t - !.,r ;Y't, \ a , F \'.?d1A1 Iw h .. It.. �l. {.ml , 1i- ,IP♦,.'.Y Y•1iti'. ,. ,,ril 1�. L �. Yak'il..ri h, ,t .� ;tv r\1N.S :J'L�a ,.. ,,,� 1. ''t ,t.\ \�': a \ • :5: . . t: ` t FF , l „R py .. , \ ♦. r,[ .. 1 {'.. \ r.. I, �1/;, r' ,`, 1'1,+.. .12 `u'. � 1.IF I{, \` WL/. �y,., �w - _.. .,: t r- ,.,. v. �� r Y.. o t e, ,.,. .... •, . . v ,: •..?,y ,, �♦ . � ,. :.0 . .. ,., .-t r. ,.i P.o ' . � ., \ ., :li s � i.., .e. _,. \ �,.. 11 .. A. �. ,., .. ,rf....., .w l.. ♦ \ e .. �. yj., ,. ,,r b> P .C.a f :,,;... �5. f .. .iH. V^ t :-s _ .. -.: ♦e ..,.,Y � \ -Y..Y ,t} _. a. "1J,1 fNbi:r� ,, � .. _..i�. ,. vv., , ... ., .r 1 I\, pp � A.'. ,. _�.... .r..<�e _-^., _ .. ., !. ..Y ..a ,.. e, ♦a•l:`' \ ,. .,. It ,. '1. ., -d.l♦ ,� V.. n. .i Y. a. \, 41 !.*. 3 .. ., ..._ �•-. .. � - w- :,,. , -.. ,. , ,., ,. � ., , ,.-. .,. .% ,. yr... ,4 ..:� "V ,„ ;{tea _: .....,.,-.. ., ., .-.: �.,. „ ,. .. \ ,, +,�. .. ,il•,Pr,,, r. 6 .:�;'' yv.. d ,� �b,S. T i•f;. ,�' �. .i -- ... s ..�'Wrla r /. .. �I .,: �. L ...... A. W v. ♦ e.,l:, r C. , . a k,1 p, .., :,. N.., � '; •Itl,:1 �I .,� q:`'.r �... �5. - _ a0 ;'. .. '. ,/ _ A , (`JY^, �,:r „ S_�_,. "e,K.. Y,, u � .,w , ,.�„-. l .`. � .., \1 .1 ,T� ,' u 1, �� , b 1•A „ i1T . .., t -: .... .., 3+..,.. .1 .' � v. n f.t � a. ,. i �'.\✓.i.�h, , o , , r v, ._ ! , �it'r ., V•I 7+. l �\�' , „ ., .Yw :\. w. '. .. .lam: � Ib ♦, _ ,�-.,o,.VYF ,,.e J 4 rh. !,l it, 1 ,,. .e P , .�� \�„ ..•Yr\,, r .�' ` `1i9j� �.. +. ,J Pd:-., ,, b 6 . '+..,. . .'k r.G', „\, 4...� .. /, 7 .. .. ,I a-. �E,t w. .,. ...1 a' 1 ,, ,.., P,•\ ,t . I � r , .� , t.,d..l, t Ot. ,,. ♦ ,� . i. �It i A \• \ Y a',, ,. ,... \.f ,_af if �.�i' r. !�yy a'�, a I .y A ::: � „F. ,�\. 4 ,� r . n ; , � Yr � 1 �, ... , '�., ,., i '1 i t' �. .,. 11, r ,•1 .\ i ,, ,. / i 1 v lY / t Yl.►�r1. , r : 't?F ,?,i: �": 'f � -. +, ,y, `y t V� ,..Ia ,N '-. •... ", y '': r.. "� ` p,14i Y9 \: ! l,�t,\ .A1 , ,Y. l•Y ',k. t. r l R 1 � . N1,, , 4ht, 1. M/. 4 i III R ,� A,4/� �,��e 1 i., , \ "r �Y� Y�'� , A: > � .. �. ,..' 1. C `� I 7:1' .fes ,. P./lr :.. .. i 1�' .S.I.i. 1:. .. ;.:. C :i .k. `,,,,.`: ",k�'... .'�,1 t `'R 1 n •�1 I�7NI'H ! '!"f t' .R. -•♦ �i �Y ,� IY , � °5'd ,Y!.n. tY sr. 11 � „� @ �'1 1�9�_ v .rC Ir'I� 'F> 1\ r 1 � ♦ R�'1 •,� `t.',, 'hl ,�'�,\1t`i., r .�'t. y}�'l 1�,,, -A 1'f� a ,a �. �' F-li p: ♦- ♦. ., 4, A:r +T' , i -i ;:A'..b,.- �P' 1'4 r a .,rYT1i �. L�`'a. y `i, ,, 'i.. �. '4�d1 `v. $ x ,��1 \ � , r \ e>. ({. ,\ t. �1 `@s �•+� � by ., � \ j yy w i g, L `„Y � .fir• )qp ,;.j� A , I. SIS ,. � _ r \' bi Q �P r CPY:, �':• •Ylr' P 1 f i♦ ,' ` , 1 1 1 y \ %( 1 ti 1 4 a. rrim�14yyiR. r\,e , \1 . i * d�i n.dM ,U i1r i. t ,1i � �'. ,y\ e lr ,1,\. 1 f4 1 \ 'II.� 1 • . f'� .f.� •\� 1 Y•1 '\� � 2 , r"'P �•�IF�': -t,', ,, ':.� � .I , ' ,"F�'i ,,. 1 '.✓ r- n:, '1, �\..;y 1M . •, 1 S , t r �'•l. ti � r.l \ e i;r1l\moi:!\rTv��� , y� ,Y�� Id 'a \ y' d` '�� v�"i(.` fir. r` ��\ �j,) 1 ,� Y '.. �''11`r 'Yt•r�. •i �t �1 Nk �,1:, yyy yy```gN nR.,1: , d!41 �' -r 1 t� �1 •� ]\ 1�1 \ � \S a:` .�y,1/y�a,] \ '�i✓;, �� , �:`' ti Yi �.YY�� 1- ,� � ; ,1 .� t!�' �a1,�t'`� I ; I '�� ♦ �� Y Y�j^aiY ,�t � ` � ' � n �i �' y`�iT,,���71h YS � At �` �' `y \ rQpR' 1\ 6, IY.`. ..Y\:. 1 � , 11{1ji•V' ,`�,,4 1 � \ �1 l ,jt ,l� 11 , ,. \ ,.� `�♦y�$ �4� ��" t .� �, �� 1 9 1°\ 4 �`'•2i.'b\' ,'� t 1� 'Sa'.1., �� t�, -> \ 2.�•. Y�B \. '\ `T`� 1+ - \ � \�� '� N `.i.l� :.�'. ,1` �p Q ,(, r�.: � l *d<�� ,', �"1r l'a. '` \ � • I � . p I • •.� '� r � ! � \' �,•,•�yfa !1+11�f14:��p {1,..�.\�t'��•-�t �1,y I ,`�`i. �1;�,�e'� ,�l'�i \ „, t� r� �. t � � �� i ��•��,.����4 �1f � + ff' �1 �\ � ,' \ � .� a l'�Y„ pt� 1 ''T�' . r� `� �M� `t"`� `, 1 \ f f�� `� 'i \\�. �. t ^,� 'IR \ d'. 3� r r I !' 1 I'� ���° ! �' Y f Y �,� � r t ��� il• '� / \ 4 \ L ti " e Mie � dy �.All. .. 16 Idiom * : •',- :*f, - t - _ : . n .,... _ ♦ 'Q,/b Y .\\ar. /i A + �" \ Y 1 i'v w b �. i:.,�. Is t \': 't1'.. Y y 1 VAi, a ,,A 1 r. .w W', !' 1 t (� ,1 \ .: ;tiri�#1 ..,..,m+, _ M ttY"'•:,�ao,a. ,.W .,,. \ 7': fw. ', 1 r ~''<;11, ,'if �t, ,+d , .1 o i4'� .b.1�;a' .Yr ':NY , 9, �Vll. if�r', t£ 7'•, k' c �• 9 ",\ t.:1 1 a �2 >•'.:.a+v?.,,. j %V.,. .,J_e►r /J".uf r�' 1 a�,,�r'tyt `. 47f ,t. 4lYi I, �1n✓ 4f\ SIL r 1 " ,SIF' r1� M 11 1 .11. 'Q, `UIY;.'I r ,�`r w.. :. I int W' _., -. ... r:. �'Atir;��il? .',• L :„'.,. ,r. ,.��: ,.2'..:�'rh.. �!Y'��. Ji 4A1W'.. •.. ', .- � I \"'�r.:?• ,'4st •� , ,v r .'>... ,',. \y'l4, '„ .' '• hu..' .. :,. «ab,a-,1 .. A ,,c , .\. 6 .R r,.,a 71�F.4'_"1 • i)'C%,�41• .,a..: 11 ., i.. •� ”, : ' 1 .1. ,;; �• ,r ,.1 \'' rt: i4 bb(M �',n , t - !.,r ;Y't, \ a , F \'.?d1A1 Iw h .. It.. �l. {.ml , 1i- ,IP♦,.'.Y Y•1iti'. ,. ,,ril 1�. L �. Yak'il..ri h, ,t .� ;tv r\1N.S :J'L�a ,.. ,,,� 1. ''t ,t.\ \�': a \ • :5: . . t: ` t FF , l „R py .. , \ ♦. r,[ .. 1 {'.. \ r.. I, �1/;, r' ,`, 1'1,+.. .12 `u'. � 1.IF I{, \` WL/. �y,., �w - _.. .,: t r- ,.,. v. �� r Y.. o t e, ,.,. .... •, . . v ,: •..?,y ,, �♦ . � ,. :.0 . .. ,., .-t r. ,.i P.o ' . � ., \ ., :li s � i.., .e. _,. \ �,.. 11 .. A. �. ,., .. ,rf....., .w l.. ♦ \ e .. �. yj., ,. ,,r b> P .C.a f :,,;... �5. f .. .iH. V^ t :-s _ .. -.: ♦e ..,.,Y � \ -Y..Y ,t} _. a. "1J,1 fNbi:r� ,, � .. _..i�. ,. vv., , ... ., .r 1 I\, pp � A.'. ,. _�.... .r..<�e _-^., _ .. ., !. ..Y ..a ,.. e, ♦a•l:`' \ ,. .,. It ,. '1. ., -d.l♦ ,� V.. n. .i Y. a. \, 41 !.*. 3 .. ., ..._ �•-. .. � - w- :,,. , -.. ,. , ,., ,. � ., , ,.-. .,. .% ,. yr... ,4 ..:� "V ,„ ;{tea _: .....,.,-.. ., ., .-.: �.,. „ ,. .. \ ,, +,�. .. ,il•,Pr,,, r. 6 .:�;'' yv.. d ,� �b,S. T i•f;. ,�' �. .i -- ... s ..�'Wrla r /. .. �I .,: �. L ...... A. W v. ♦ e.,l:, r C. , . a k,1 p, .., :,. N.., � '; •Itl,:1 �I .,� q:`'.r �... �5. - _ a0 ;'. .. '. ,/ _ A , (`JY^, �,:r „ S_�_,. "e,K.. Y,, u � .,w , ,.�„-. l .`. � .., \1 .1 ,T� ,' u 1, �� , b 1•A „ i1T . .., t -: .... .., 3+..,.. .1 .' � v. n f.t � a. ,. i �'.\✓.i.�h, , o , , r v, ._ ! , �it'r ., V•I 7+. l �\�' , „ ., .Yw :\. w. '. .. .lam: � Ib ♦, _ ,�-.,o,.VYF ,,.e J 4 rh. !,l it, 1 ,,. .e P , .�� \�„ ..•Yr\,, r .�' ` `1i9j� �.. +. ,J Pd:-., ,, b 6 . '+..,. . .'k r.G', „\, 4...� .. /, 7 .. .. ,I a-. �E,t w. .,. ...1 a' 1 ,, ,.., P,•\ ,t . I � r , .� , t.,d..l, t Ot. ,,. ♦ ,� . i. �It i A \• \ Y a',, ,. ,... \.f ,_af if �.�i' r. !�yy a'�, a I .y A ::: � „F. ,�\. 4 ,� r . n ; , � Yr � 1 �, ... , '�., ,., i '1 i t' �. .,. 11, r ,•1 .\ i ,, ,. / i 1 v lY / t Yl.►�r1. , r : 't?F ,?,i: �": 'f � -. +, ,y, `y t V� ,..Ia ,N '-. •... ", y '': r.. "� ` p,14i Y9 \: ! l,�t,\ .A1 , ,Y. l•Y ',k. t. r l R 1 � . N1,, , 4ht, 1. M/. 4 i III R ,� A,4/� �,��e 1 i., , \ "r �Y� Y�'� , A: > � .. �. ,..' 1. C `� I 7:1' .fes ,. P./lr :.. .. i 1�' .S.I.i. 1:. .. ;.:. C :i .k. `,,,,.`: ",k�'... .'�,1 t `'R 1 n •�1 I�7NI'H ! '!"f t' .R. -•♦ �i �Y ,� IY , � °5'd ,Y!.n. tY sr. 11 � „� @ �'1 1�9�_ v .rC Ir'I� 'F> 1\ r 1 � ♦ R�'1 •,� `t.',, 'hl ,�'�,\1t`i., r .�'t. y}�'l 1�,,, -A 1'f� a ,a �. �' F-li p: ♦- ♦. ., 4, A:r +T' , i -i ;:A'..b,.- �P' 1'4 r a .,rYT1i �. L�`'a. y `i, ,, 'i.. �. '4�d1 `v. $ x ,��1 \ � , r \ e>. ({. ,\ t. �1 `@s �•+� � by ., � \ j yy w i g, L `„Y � .fir• )qp ,;.j� A , I. SIS ,. � _ r \' bi Q �P r CPY:, �':• •Ylr' P 1 f i♦ ,' ` , 1 1 1 y \ %( 1 ti 1 4 a. rrim�14yyiR. r\,e , \1 . i * d�i n.dM ,U i1r i. t ,1i � �'. ,y\ e lr ,1,\. 1 f4 1 \ 'II.� 1 • . f'� .f.� •\� 1 Y•1 '\� � 2 , r"'P �•�IF�': -t,', ,, ':.� � .I , ' ,"F�'i ,,. 1 '.✓ r- n:, '1, �\..;y 1M . •, 1 S , t r �'•l. ti � r.l \ e i;r1l\moi:!\rTv��� , y� ,Y�� Id 'a \ y' d` '�� v�"i(.` fir. r` ��\ �j,) 1 ,� Y '.. �''11`r 'Yt•r�. •i �t �1 Nk �,1:, yyy yy```gN nR.,1: , d!41 �' -r 1 t� �1 •� ]\ 1�1 \ � \S a:` .�y,1/y�a,] \ '�i✓;, �� , �:`' ti Yi �.YY�� 1- ,� � ; ,1 .� t!�' �a1,�t'`� I ; I '�� ♦ �� Y Y�j^aiY ,�t � ` � ' � n �i �' y`�iT,,���71h YS � At �` �' `y \ rQpR' 1\ 6, IY.`. ..Y\:. 1 � , 11{1ji•V' ,`�,,4 1 � \ �1 l ,jt ,l� 11 , ,. \ ,.� `�♦y�$ �4� ��" t .� �, �� 1 9 1°\ 4 �`'•2i.'b\' ,'� t 1� 'Sa'.1., �� t�, -> \ 2.�•. Y�B \. '\ `T`� 1+ - \ � \�� '� N `.i.l� :.�'. ,1` �p Q ,(, r�.: � l *d<�� ,', �"1r l'a. '` \ � • I � . p I • •.� '� r � ! � \' �,•,•�yfa !1+11�f14:��p {1,..�.\�t'��•-�t �1,y I ,`�`i. �1;�,�e'� ,�l'�i \ „, t� r� �. t � � �� i ��•��,.����4 �1f � + ff' �1 �\ � ,' \ � .� a l'�Y„ pt� 1 ''T�' . r� `� �M� `t"`� `, 1 \ f f�� `� 'i \\�. �. t ^,� 'IR \ d'. 3� r r I !' 1 I'� ���° ! �' Y f Y �,� � r t ��� il• '� / \ _t Y ILL ', �� I :.tAll ..►'r dr..raA.i.i� i Ne rwyIt It �,�,y, n , k J✓ zia nP�lYAf�►(r 'I' i n� Al r i�o 1 H _IYvly` �, vhf. sa. 'd All 41 1 `IGIIIt Y� Not 0.Yfn�4 l�J�T .y}Y �, -1n Mr16 .(f c I1xN1�I1/ pp �'°+l ' a a"' Ile icy.. s y'a�M'4�1�ruRa VY yd 5 .x je a+ 4J wig s 1� w r.�M�ApV- _.� 441 Li w 01 vi 4th,` n r {h r'. u:a vN JI rF y, .Vr 1 r rlFir; v 4 p I Alt axle � d Milo 11 N 1111 11 11 11 11 11 11 1111 1111 1111 11 111111 1111 1111 111 11 1111 II 1111 111111 1111 1111 111111 11 111111 1111 1111 11111 1111 1111 II 1111 111111 1111 1111 111111 11 111111 11_ 111111 1111 1111 11111 1111 1111 II 1111 111111 1111 1111 111111 11 ILLaIlL�l 111111 1111 1111 11111 Ir.... 16�... ill 1111 111111 111111 111111 1111 1111 11111 111111 1111II II 1111 111111 111111 111111 111111 11 B HER 111111 111111 nil 1111 I 111111 � it 11 • " 111.111111 111111 1 111111 1111 1111 111111 11111 111 111111 111111 1 n 111111 111111 1111 1111 111111 I I 111 111111 111111 1 111111 HIM 1111 1111 111111 IL,a�� 111.111111 111111 1 111111 111111 1111 1111 111111 11 111111 111111 1 111111 111111 1111 1111 111111 11� 111111 111111 1 1111111111 nil 11-11 In nil I III VIIII111111 11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII II114-910,111,111,111111IIIII111111 1111 Illi 1111 1111 1111 1111 IIIIII -- 11 MAMfpL XW STONE EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTE5 wovmE caWRETf PL91e W': AT PLL �1T5voJFE Mwlcx SnLL.GNT4 t. bRME OR ROOiS. 1 tLL CONCM, 6VWTS.ETO. TO BE PMIIEO TO MATCH pA,PCFHT9LRP 3.6VlIF}Ya M'O DpWSFDJIS AGE PRGMSX® AtN�NLIM MR SiNNIN69HM MET#RAF % FPvR LEMENT5mH6-C04LR.A F2 RBERLEMBITSQ)EM-(OLLRB iPl JEAIILAL EEERf9!PT PKt9. Bhl1EH5 AT M"OL.-. C�ILRA A TXR[E fJIMENaIaVAL KANALT5N4161% M6 �STONE A ee 1111 111111 1111 161:L: Ire: 111111 111111 111111 �FLEVATON=,76'4 _ �tLLSHEMCIOs. ELEVAPOv=t2a'4' FLP/Nll =t10'A F �ELNAnGN=tl6'-0 V _ �WESHFlRRIG�. g nrAnW = tV'-0• — _ �_sEwuo rtaoM TbrcesJe.P�.� ei.EanncN=na-n B T EILNAtYTI =1]fi-0" � HEYATtlN�l7a'O" " ZZI ON ELN TtlX ,Nb64 ,��g1 �E4NAlbN ,a4.. s - ELNAMN - „z -6- M � OEss PL?� �� EIEVAMX a VO' -Il l/ 15 DEC 2020 9 Hickory Trails Estates 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS :::::".;., 'PAX Iowa City, IowaWW,s°..:.... 11 11 11 A"iON Ii n n n 1111 11 EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTE5 &RA 1.VOTE5PVyrEW':.. ATPLLcOvp5ea(F WIILX SRLL GNTo bRPOE ORR ROOOOES. 2 µt COMNR, Ffc1E?3, V TD, ET O. TO M FM TO MATOHiW1IKF11T9 Am 3. 61R1E25 M'O DpU1SFOJI�FRE PR@M5X®AWIINIIM MR 5TA1NMO9HM MET#ROOF P1 FPvR LEMEXT5mH6-C04LR.A F2 RBERLEMENTSmEM-(OLLRB F% JEAIILAL EEERf9!PT Pµ9. BAT1EH5 AT M"OL.-!MCRA A TXR[E fJINENaIaVAL KANALT3N4161% M9 M VFALl1 STONE !ifillpq �ERA, Y CARE 1 n Hickory Tra 15 DEC 2020 -Iddmmmft� 9 ils Estates Arclutectute 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSWAVWATP�A It $42124t'.111.3131 "I 114.121.111, �AX Iowa City, Iowa _1 r j CITY OF IOWA CITY CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: March 18, 2021 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Re: REZ20-0016 — Hickory Trail Rezoning Resubmission Background Information: On February 18, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public meeting on a rezoning of approximately 48.75 acres of land from Interim Development — Single Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). Staff recommended approval with five conditions related to approval of a Woodland Management Plan, provision of trail connections, incorporation of traffic calming devices, installation of right-of-way trees, and platting requirements. The motion to approve the rezoning failed by a vote of 0-7. The applicant, Axiom Consultants, applying on behalf of Joseph Clark and Nelson Development 1, LLC., has submitted a revised OPD Plan and Sensitive Areas Development for the Commission's consideration. Revised Submission: The revised OPD Plan contains the following changes to the layout from the plan that was previously reviewed by the Commission: 1. The removal of five lots from the west and south side of Hickory Trail (as seen in Figure 1 below). The former submission contains 19 single-family lots along the west and south side of the street. The current submission contains 14 lots along this stretch. The applicant is still proposing to make a connection to the Park trail system in the middle of this undeveloped stretch of land. 2. To offset losses along the street's west side, the applicant has reduced lot widths along lots on the east side of Hickory Trail to add two additional lots on the east side. The total number of detached single-family residential lots has been reduced from 43 to 40 lots. 3. Enhanced landscaping is proposed for several hundred feet north of the Lot 36. The proposed landscaping in this area is detailed in the attached OPD Plan. 4. The acreage in Outlot A, that is proposed to be dedicated to the City for the expansion of Hickory Hill Park, would be increased from 10.86 acres to 11.66 acres. 5. Per staff, the applicant has shifted the proposed traffic circle and the pedestrian raised crosswalk connecting to the park slightly to the south. These changes were made to more efficiently distribute the spacing between the traffic calming devices. 6. The percent of impacted critical slopes went down from 19% to 17%. However, the percent of preserved woodlands went down from 48% to 46%. March 12, 2021 Page 2 Fiqure 1 — Former Hickory Trail OPD Plan Staff Comments: -figure 1 — Kevised HICKory I rail UFU Flan The applicant has revised the OPD Plan to include initial feedback from staff pertaining to street tree spacing and some minor map symbology issues. The revised plans have been shared with Public Works and Parks staff for additional comment. Attachments: 1. Revised OPD and Sensitive Areas Development Plan and Landscape Plan (03.12.2021) 2. March Meeting Correspondence Approved by: I ') - Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services a§3E§-6tl§ - l n P, Aq JA - i47�tlHHLP%YIX \ - Staff Comments: -figure 1 — Kevised HICKory I rail UFU Flan The applicant has revised the OPD Plan to include initial feedback from staff pertaining to street tree spacing and some minor map symbology issues. The revised plans have been shared with Public Works and Parks staff for additional comment. Attachments: 1. Revised OPD and Sensitive Areas Development Plan and Landscape Plan (03.12.2021) 2. March Meeting Correspondence Approved by: I ') - Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA APPLICANT 1: APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: PRELIMINARYOPD AND G. JOSEPH CLARK PHELAN TUCKER LAW — yN INGTON ST JOHN BEASLEY CITY CLERK DATE IOWA CITY,221 E. 2240 321 E. MARKTST I� �Z� SENSITIVEAREAS DWACITY, IA62245 __l-- jm DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: _I J-- ®No NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON HICKORY' LA TRAIL 2186TH AVE., STE 200 SO E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 IOWA CITY, IOWA DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 94111 /..>� P�j4____=� \.,\ JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BDALTON@KMCW.COM 1 \'a z 3 NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX CIAO OVERALLSENSITIVEFEATURES C3.10 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -SENSITIVE SLOPES C1.20 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WOODLAND AREAS C1.30 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WETLAND AND BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR E] � If I r 1W / Lf 1 _ If i \\ iE �u B J 1 \. l _ c ° ss� NOTES: 1a3.� sr 7 1 t \ gym„ - L %��� s i 1. NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ARE PRESENT. ; e �, — , 4 � KEY NOTES QA CONSERVATION EASEMENT t AC H TCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED HA _ LA.0 U B B WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION F" a �UTiOT 1 3 99A 0 15' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT ,, .,„,•,� V r" I C �J 4 s L- 1 29 a��, mod a 1 Z I J a Ulif x \ I w i vc. 4- 22 2 � i GG a a 10 �F _ - r IS may. r1 1% r z> x ,L oll I 15 41 17 - AID ,e. - �r - ° s v w of EO - ZO _ r T v ➢ E u °J Z �� �� �� 39 18 9 bUTLO" 38 -- AC 37 T A F �A. 1166 kc � , ��L, _ .�` ` \ \� ' 35Q LAC ` 35 343 P zL qlms� 130195F LCI _iW `O - uILILu1 � ���� v, / Q � jp,6LaEu MLLLr NAM /.l �V �I T.,. 3 > v SHEETNUMBER. C1.00 L OUTLOTS:-- ) OUTLOT SF ACRES INTENDED USE A 508,046 1166 DEDICATED TO CITY FOR PARK SPACE \ \ B 173,648 399 CONSERVATION EASEMENT ROW 183,672 422 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR H ICKORY TRAIL EXTENSION LOT A" Z — 3 tl•,0 ---- 4.22 .0 E] � If I r 1W / Lf 1 _ If i \\ iE �u B J 1 \. l _ c ° ss� NOTES: 1a3.� sr 7 1 t \ gym„ - L %��� s i 1. NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ARE PRESENT. ; e �, — , 4 � KEY NOTES QA CONSERVATION EASEMENT t AC H TCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED HA _ LA.0 U B B WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION F" a �UTiOT 1 3 99A 0 15' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT ,, .,„,•,� V r" I C �J 4 s L- 1 29 a��, mod a 1 Z I J a Ulif x \ I w i vc. 4- 22 2 � i GG a a 10 �F _ - r IS may. r1 1% r z> x ,L oll I 15 41 17 - AID ,e. - �r - ° s v w of EO - ZO _ r T v ➢ E u °J Z �� �� �� 39 18 9 bUTLO" 38 -- AC 37 T A F �A. 1166 kc � , ��L, _ .�` ` \ \� ' 35Q LAC ` 35 343 P zL qlms� 130195F LCI _iW `O - uILILu1 � ���� v, / Q � jp,6LaEu MLLLr NAM /.l �V �I T.,. 3 > v SHEETNUMBER. C1.00 APPLICANT I: APPLICANT I'S ATTORNEY: PRELIMINARYOPD AND G. JOSEPH CLARK PHELAN TUCKER LAW 221 E. BURLINGTON ST JOHN BEASLEY SENSITIVE AREAS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52246 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: DEVELOPMENT PLAN NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE IMPACTED QUANTITII HI CKO RY TRAI L ATTN: JACOB WOLFGANG ATTN BRYCE K. DALTON NOTES: AREA (SF) ®F, 6,175 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 3O IOWA CITY, IOWA 22 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT IAKECITY, UTAH 84111 EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE 15 PROVIDED. NO PROTECTED SLOPES OR ® 1,647 ® 965 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM �0 NOTES: AREA (SF) ®F, 6,175 V 4,286 3O 1. THERE ARE PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OFTHE DEVELOPMENT. ABUTTER ® 3,783 22 4,737 © EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE 15 PROVIDED. NO PROTECTED SLOPES OR ® 1,647 ® 965 9O BUFFERS ARE IMPACTED WITH THIS PROJECT. �0 280 8 42 C 1,260 2. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 35%CELLE TOTAL. ® 2,488 �5 4,143 �6 CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA LSH PERCENTAGE 5,422 TOTAL 55,081 ® 8,183 IMPACTED SLOPES 55,DB1 17% TOTAL 144,255 NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 222,612 69% NON -IMPACTED SLOPES IN PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER 44,026 14% 1F CRITICAL SLOPES PPIDfl TO DEVELOPMENT) 321,719 10094 'I 3. STEEP SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (OF PERCENTAGE IMPACTED SLOPES 140.255 44% 1 1 NONIMPACTEDSLOPES 181.700 56% STEEP SLOPES(PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 325,963 100% \I f I 1 LOT "A' 4."2 L j LL 10 183,67�5F �. i -nLF 33 I 4 S SF BB 0 BB,6>F 34 � r �I /I q -� u LOCATION AREA (SF) ®F, 6,175 V 4,286 3O 5,032 ® 3,783 22 4,737 © 4,559 ® 1,647 ® 965 9O 1,616 �0 280 8 42 C 1,260 ® 6,713 ® 2,488 �5 4,143 �6 1,933 ® 5,422 TOTAL 55,081 LOCATION AREA ESE) ®F, 5,036 (J 1,418 (0 1,885 21 972 22 2,940 �3 6,318 ® 17,472 40,906 �b 1,058 © 6,260 8 1,817 �9 5,458 ® 2,322 3,884 �2 6,219 © 4,858 ® 3,910 U3 11,426 ® 8,183 © 11,913 TOTAL 144,255 �Zm I - _ l D r ®V- 'O_ -C ^ p N.15 - \ 3 g 'hhJ`10 GC'Elei 1N11STI l00 22 15 �� au m66'T, \ 23 I \ \\ \ 11 \ E7 - p¢€ E z o w f a\=' � ' I <.i OOT-LGT 8 -173,6� BE 7Msi` 8 ✓�� '� ��27 1 774,8 I I ]� 13,613 SF I 31- LOAi� - f 10S9n Is < ca 3 3011 `-� e� Il is`F I( Ln DO a Ln x J Z\ \ I o DO a )� a SF ¢ U 15 T yA A T H z w I \ > 1b 22 23 24 r 30 �o 2i � n r' 20 7-z0BEACT o P z::J�:r Y w T/t E 0 E U Z g40 3\9-. ` - \� 18 1�l. e..so4>\2e „_ '3. z:;` / 3 e = a Lwii `ED 0 26 AT 38 A 31 J�UT�OT /j � - 3 -- - Rl53bAcF j 1164 B asF s 3B I JI / SPB oa6�i� X37 5(L V �'a - --- 36 35 343 3�6T ��1 w J \ ✓-�, \ 1 ✓ dos p _FILL ! aIA / ------- EEL USCI ,.��ti i' % ELL 2 1 I. + I �\ o uMLL_u 0 o Z �zmj DO m pLZw/t o O UT IS STEM NUMBER C1.10 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA APPLICANT I: APPLICANT I'S ATTORNEY: G. JOSEPH CLARK PHELAN TUCKER LAW 221 E. BURLINGTON ST JOHN BEASLEY IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 321 E. MARKET ST � IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTNAACOB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM NOTES: 1. THERE ARE WOODED AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING PORTIONS OF THE WOODED AREAS. PER IOWA CITY CODE FOR R&5, A MINIMUM OF SON, OF THE EXISTING WOODLANDS MUST BE PRESERVED. RS -S WOODLAND PRESERVATION CALCULATION AREA(SFI PERCENTAGE DISTURBEDWOODLAND 480,433 36% BUFFER 150'WIOE) 231,316 SB% '1 PRESERVEDWOODIAND 613,315 46% WOODLAND (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT( 1,325,064 100% 'I 2. THE DEVELOPMENT IS 4% SHORT OF THE REQUIRED 5M WOODLAND RETENTION THRESHOLD. REPLACEMENT TREES WILL BE PROVIDED TO OFFSET THIS DEFICIENCY. CITY CODE REQUIRES i REPLACEMENT TREES AT A RATE OF 1 TREE PER 2005E OF DISTURBED WOODLAND REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TREES= (1,321,064' ON )/2UIT=265 TREES 3. REPLACEMENT TREES ARE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: ' LOCATION COUNT SHEET STIIEET TREES 109 -1.00 OAT A BETWEEN LOTS 37 44 L1.10 LOT" UD $ 4. D AC OITROTA BEHIND LOTS 29-32 18 L1.10 1R3,6R SF LOT 70 L3.O0 / LOT@ 24 L2.00 �- TOTAL 265 LEGEND: AREA ISE) 23 SITE EXISTING PROPOSED OFFICERINDEX —IC0 � CONTOUR INTERMFOUSE — 101 � 00;— ¢'BARB WIREv—,— 5,892 3 STREAM CENTERONE +3A' 9,275 TOTAL 480;433 — CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS Ile NO REMOVAL LIMITS AT ENE ;' a OF CONSERVALON EASEMENT F 11 SENSUTVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WOODLAND PRESERVIORM GO III u = 12`. = LAI I I I _ i I 1 y IMPACTED QUANTITIES: / NEtlI®C� PoUST WOODLANDS LOCATION AREA ISE) 23 119,329 © 119,455 © 36,847 hall 2,135 SF 40,474 LET�5 5,892 3 147,025 +3A' I I _ i I 1 y IMPACTED QUANTITIES: / NEtlI®C� PoUST WOODLANDS LOCATION AREA ISE) 23 119,329 © 119,455 © 36,847 hall 2,135 SF 40,474 LET�5 5,892 © 147,025 �H 9,275 TOTAL 480;433 O all 065F O IMPACUDW0001ANo `\\\\` \�\ _ 14 15 uivsF xi �F NOR TO WlUYAPE PIAN ♦ .'r V AVA A AV `(\V AVS „ �wvw vw��vwv 41 _ II 17 IT \\ \ N \\ 39 38 / OUT66Ac 37 / - =Bac h.I. O 65F rI�'��eNmQ��. 111bII�GU�a j J: �I I I ®�44P�,N41Y4 \ lam\ P'I�ISf��4Atl V0�1�0.PW� Ifi ! \ II I I I I J i i .\If IF \ \ \ I'S AN 18 19 23 —� N? A Z 9 hall 934 SF ISAMIF LET�5 26 13,0L94 _ sWN, LI.331k — io Ile r ;' a °:SAL F 11 > a o 0 GO III u �47 4 12`. 8 LAI U OUTLOT 1 a8 32i 0 IS13 399 AC Eu 2 173 49IF On „RII, 25 p2 27. FIRE O o e -I C P2 AF IF d >0 > IF 2 p N IMPACUDW0001ANo `\\\\` \�\ _ 14 15 uivsF xi �F NOR TO WlUYAPE PIAN ♦ .'r V AVA A AV `(\V AVS „ �wvw vw��vwv 41 _ II 17 IT \\ \ N \\ 39 38 / OUT66Ac 37 / - =Bac h.I. O 65F rI�'��eNmQ��. 111bII�GU�a j J: �I I I ®�44P�,N41Y4 \ lam\ P'I�ISf��4Atl V0�1�0.PW� Ifi ! \ II I I I I J i i .\If IF \ \ \ I'S AN 18 19 23 1 N? A Z 9 hall 934 SF ISAMIF LET�5 26 13,0L94 IF, LI.331k J_ Q io K r ;' a °:SAL F 11 > a o 0 GO III u �47 4 12`. F LAI U W Z a8 32i 0 IS13 Fee Eu 2 a On „RII, 25 IMPACUDW0001ANo `\\\\` \�\ _ 14 15 uivsF xi �F NOR TO WlUYAPE PIAN ♦ .'r V AVA A AV `(\V AVS „ �wvw vw��vwv 41 _ II 17 IT \\ \ N \\ 39 38 / OUT66Ac 37 / - =Bac h.I. O 65F rI�'��eNmQ��. 111bII�GU�a j J: �I I I ®�44P�,N41Y4 \ lam\ P'I�ISf��4Atl V0�1�0.PW� Ifi ! \ II I I I I J i i .\If IF \ \ \ I'S AN 18 19 23 15,955 IF N? A Z B29 AI 2122 28 23 35 Aid Z B29 AI hall 934 SF ISAMIF LET�5 0 13,0L94 IF, LI.331k J_ Q } K r n_ f :�t I 1 . 1 1 . 1 I I I 1 I I I i C/ 28 -/� 35 Aid Z 33 OA I'm soB.IW 934 ISAMIF LET�5 0 f :�t I 1 . 1 1 . 1 I I I 1 I I I i C/ 28 35 Aid Z 33 OA I'm soB.IW 0 21 ISAMIF LET�5 0 13,0L94 f :�t I 1 . 1 1 . 1 I I I 1 I I I i C/ YWK e m <BE D BE 3 3 28 W Z 2A 32 0 21 ISAMIF LET�5 0 30 IF, LI.331k YWK e m <BE D BE 3 3 31 W Z ls,iv sF 32 LET�5 0 YWK e m <BE D BE 3 3 GO W Z F- LET�5 0 W J_ Q } K r aa a F ? > a o 0 w W F LAI U W Z f 30 GO W Z F- LET�5 0 W J_ Q } K r a a F ? > a } w W F LAI U W Z f 30 Eu 2 a On OFF LUQ W F w W P U �o Q z a3 W a Z p2 DO J O o e -I C IF d >0 > IF 2 p N C1.20 PRELIMINARYOPD AND APPLICANT I: G. JOSEPH CLARK APPLICANT I'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW ]00 CONTOURINTERMEDIATE101 — 221 E. INGTON ST JOHN BEASLEY SENSITIVE AREAS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 3221 E.M MARKET ST —� CONSTRUCTION AREA UNITS IOWA CITY, IA 52245 DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICANT2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: SENSITIVE AREAS AREA NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE H I C KO RY T RA I L ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 218 6TH AVE, STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 IOWA CITY, IOWA DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BOALTON@KMCLAW.COM LEGEND: i� SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOURINDEX100— ]00 CONTOURINTERMEDIATE101 — lA4 FENCE: DARDWIREv>y— 9RC STRGMaNTERUNE -- --- SIGN —� CONSTRUCTION AREA UNITS SIR FENCE �•� 1REERWWµUMITSAtEDGE 97595E OFCONSERVAPON EPSEMEM SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WETLAND BLUE LINE 1. SILT FENCE TO BE PLACED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE GRADING LIMITS AS SHOWN PRIOR TO ANY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. 1 1 i II t� LOT "A" 2 3� 422 AC o.eo AL 183,672 SF 59 AC _ 955655 It 5OOAC 278 IS 64. Go .. , e � 2 % ! •sy � loo' aW D BUFFER`\ `A C uo°iae`s \ F OUTLOT A 11.96 AC SWIMS BE / ! I I CBVICf�O�'V'. �t�0�OVVR I �yJ i m Al114 `,P 17 65F 35 635 " ES 10 u3 EOA5 AC 30' STREAM BUFFER w anal H&m Lnm ::EZm I H N OJm HF X0i us It �..� 1fG*�Wtl ffE a 3 /.. I AftMOE� U'ET I c _k I "�q II II x V Z o o w 3 C p a I I g 1 > O z o 0 &1 1 a v sIj E"q 1 I 1 +`. 301 STREAM 1= 1 y BUFFERI la y 1 OUTLOT IGO, v9nass WETLAND BUFFER / F 3 _ =7_m• / SIRE M BUFF R vi 6299 I I �� N 1 LU Z 26 28 0E2 AC I I 14JIMSP v T N p d w' 5 i O a 25 29 g 31 ,,;"F 240 SF 23 24 , 30 b 1 0 o `` i1y335F '® Z(T 33.9155E 39,A15F / 3253E SF IF 1 G U Z 18 J 3.9935E q a = a w L7 0 ..37 55E 16;935. 31 OBAC 193335E g 34 33 325 j .. �St.\i 3995E 9,135- 9.3WSF SEARS 5f .V 1 O > K F- u N IN P'Y WIISLV Iw �i�� !J, i UPI)Z W DEo o W LF) Z o / z ? 1 I LL I �gU, G�w�to � I i 1 ; I sxErirvumBER: C1.30 i� 1 :`; 147 AC 20,512Y 9RC w anal H&m Lnm ::EZm I H N OJm HF X0i us It �..� 1fG*�Wtl ffE a 3 /.. I AftMOE� U'ET I c _k I "�q II II x V Z o o w 3 C p a I I g 1 > O z o 0 &1 1 a v sIj E"q 1 I 1 +`. 301 STREAM 1= 1 y BUFFERI la y 1 OUTLOT IGO, v9nass WETLAND BUFFER / F 3 _ =7_m• / SIRE M BUFF R vi 6299 I I �� N 1 LU Z 26 28 0E2 AC I I 14JIMSP v T N p d w' 5 i O a 25 29 g 31 ,,;"F 240 SF 23 24 , 30 b 1 0 o `` i1y335F '® Z(T 33.9155E 39,A15F / 3253E SF IF 1 G U Z 18 J 3.9935E q a = a w L7 0 ..37 55E 16;935. 31 OBAC 193335E g 34 33 325 j .. �St.\i 3995E 9,135- 9.3WSF SEARS 5f .V 1 O > K F- u N IN P'Y WIISLV Iw �i�� !J, i UPI)Z W DEo o W LF) Z o / z ? 1 I LL I �gU, G�w�to � I i 1 ; I sxErirvumBER: C1.30 41 40 9RC 3 onos J 38 97595E 37 B E w anal H&m Lnm ::EZm I H N OJm HF X0i us It �..� 1fG*�Wtl ffE a 3 /.. I AftMOE� U'ET I c _k I "�q II II x V Z o o w 3 C p a I I g 1 > O z o 0 &1 1 a v sIj E"q 1 I 1 +`. 301 STREAM 1= 1 y BUFFERI la y 1 OUTLOT IGO, v9nass WETLAND BUFFER / F 3 _ =7_m• / SIRE M BUFF R vi 6299 I I �� N 1 LU Z 26 28 0E2 AC I I 14JIMSP v T N p d w' 5 i O a 25 29 g 31 ,,;"F 240 SF 23 24 , 30 b 1 0 o `` i1y335F '® Z(T 33.9155E 39,A15F / 3253E SF IF 1 G U Z 18 J 3.9935E q a = a w L7 0 ..37 55E 16;935. 31 OBAC 193335E g 34 33 325 j .. �St.\i 3995E 9,135- 9.3WSF SEARS 5f .V 1 O > K F- u N IN P'Y WIISLV Iw �i�� !J, i UPI)Z W DEo o W LF) Z o / z ? 1 I LL I �gU, G�w�to � I i 1 ; I sxErirvumBER: C1.30 CONCEPT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES \I IOWA CITY, IOWA UPDATED MARCH 10, 2021 N. 1ST A�ENUE I �I LOT T �� A>` (� ��ITERIJ 183.67zsrjII ♦ ?� y, � CON �p��wncsr EEPSEMENT' V a ��'�� OAK KNOLL �-- '" \N� ENTRANCE \ .'5 Nl- zo bC ELET4yl IrEe L _. 1 �� Q � ,Q0 i ! Com" !� L� ete �na _ 1 e i r„ ro6,. �! hIl v Fn , PROJECT DATA:i 6 3 a CONseRvnTiOn ��1��w EASEMENT TOTAL DEVELOP M ENT AREA 48.75 ACRES PARK DEDICATION AREA 11.66 ACRESOOTgAC �TB - - \. I13' S' ]0 LEGEND: �' 4.6= a .� / PARK DEDICATION ! +� 1.ys �' so y 4u �� d �� asp. 11 ♦ r u S CONSERVATION EASEMENT �� A r Q �'"-{� ♦ ♦♦ ,ew, BE 5 1� 12 -DIET AC IU \ `. Vim'— p 1. T 3� ♦♦ $' ,m �52 BE If ♦u �� 20,ME 93 39 n,, 18 E1�J ,s 3� ;,s y - I o s _ %/ , �UTQOT� 37�ERE 4G �� / // X263 soeiwc! /'� / �\ co . �!� 3 ((( \ V I `\� >� > a� A.rV I .108' I s,'. Ef \3 % 'bss � I I. / A k a \ EXISTING / q' ! I f'L 1 V ERl /�\VAu Pui a Avn� ' TREE LINE A �j If ���✓ i- \ i TE I i T ej�yf 5< / d}5 Y�ra? Li _rte, ti—200'— w Z vM 1 W 6 N Y O W Q I 99V95��1 [[ Q u I z w = } Z / ,IA''P I < 00 H vN'i .��;� ➢ Luwz= sf /EXISTING 1 0 2 a W l7 r y I TRAIL 9 ] 6{ Q w 3 o T 1VR �orssE � m UIf o N s 656 EE u RU UMBER ` EMSfING RAIL 02.00 �l r; Y�ra? Li _rte, ti—200'— w Z vM 1 W 6 N Y O W Q I 99V95��1 [[ Q u I z w = } Z / ,IA''P I < 00 H vN'i .��;� ➢ Luwz= sf /EXISTING 1 0 2 a W l7 r y I TRAIL Q w 3 o w m UIf o N Z EE u UMBER 02.00 PLANTS: PROPOSED DECIDUOUS STREET TREE ° SPECIES AS LABELED FINAL PLANTING LOCATION OF STREET TREES TO BE DETERMINED BY LOCATION OF DRIVEWAYS AND VISION TRIANGLES. GROUND COVER: NATIVE SAVANNA PLANT MIX: ION EXCHANGE, INC. SAVANNA I WOODLAND EDGE- NATIVE SEED MIX #: SAV -WOO -MIX -LB OR EQUIVALENT NATIVE WOODLAND PLANT MIX: DPAJRIP AAnnN Al11RSFRV 1 �. l ��o\'01 FAA STREET TREE PLANTING SCHEDULE ID Ob. WrANIWfWMMON NAME ROOT SPACING a Fig rvn/M.x,ONx oa5xgwnlmW 0 am 6 Np wBe sEETYPIMPUBEEN J IANA SE 5 I{D II RM, Exwbi XX Pa'z 'Qs TANNx M"PJASSww r a a ? > SEE I`xN�,"'aaxN Be m✓MSNDNN �O 2 PMERBEEF vu � M 2 Nm mak, ANA&x as rl"AAEMN 2 a Evil � L7 aww.m w�mrvP a� ./A5N,awN a RIOUNEORMIAM EL ai E ; rv..rMSNw,x cN BRIFIRMINT EVE, >- o 0 Z a° G "PlASUrowN = ON 7 N v Leer 6_uwlphaaOJUW Be m✓Mixowx Am 10 NR Mt`. B` 91 m.rMxmrn KBWA am 6 oKeMveam" an rv.JN55xBNN HOPIANE pm 9 BE 3B�PiM�N lomool "ME ONE AM a cualmtmk� an 30 rv./MS SWANIPWHETEa, (mem'b %m.' Be m/n55,wwx NAME a'ukamx.a' IVASNwwx rvn./K 51MUN'x AMEMEANUAl UK 2 ul"'NaAhre, Be MM/ASSXONN WMENEElal met t ulaae�.BNM ED mJM w AM) Old MEN! 2 ul"ImMUMP Be M IMS N Rucc uuumN°INUMNA Be M/tl SNNNx OEM TRANEFFOAMOB xoE.USAN5aee5Make,:MEE �a a,.,�,mMx,aNxxPIS kwola qwm A f �Zen OF An m 000nsionoZ V OZ UZ BE D 3a 3 Ell Z Fig 27 0 'I{► 6 'o J w 5 I{D II r � r a a ? > a } �O 2 F vu � M _ 6 2 a Evil � L7 a� �Zen OF An m 000nsionoZ V OZ UZ BE D 3a 3 F - Ell Z Fig 0 6 'o J w 5 a r � r a a ? > a } �O 2 F vu � M _ 6 2 a Evil � L7 F - Z Ell 6 W W Z _ �g o U a� a z EL F- >- o 0 Z a° G a o = 3 N v FTNOMBEN: L1.00 LANDSCAPE LEGEND PLANTS: O PROPOSED DECIDUOUS OVERSTORY TREE PROPOSED DECIDUOUS UNDERSTORY TREE PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE PROPOSED SHRUB GROUND COVER: NATIVE SAVANNA PLANT MIX: ION EXCHANGE, INC. SAVANNA I WOODLAND EDGE -NATIVE SEED MIX #: SAV -WOO -MIX -LB OR EQUIVALENT NATIVEWOODLAND PLANT MIX: PRAIRIE MOON NURSERY SHADY WOODLAND SEED MIX x SWD OR EQUIVALENT LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE ID QTY BOTpNIGp1/LOMMON NAME MIN. sm AtlOT E1/EROlFEJ TREES MJ z z z lV 10 E sTEIEN RADGPDAR 31EGH! BB FM ] Rnus Rr bus 3'IEIGM BE 'o EAS NWHRE FINE J DECIOI W lIS TREES I SHRUBS ID QIY. I BOTANMALCOMMON NAME MAX. SRE ROOT B u 2"DBH BE z Z > SERGBA,HRY o,,b,, } Oma, 2 F NR Y RED K 2'DBH BB Ouercw irocr¢wya 2 OM 6 BI OAK 2"DBH BE Qrya 05 7 emET�urwDKORv ff GKs 2"DER aU R r ,kr AA 9 serve Barr 2 DDH BB =w a 8 �w 2'NBH BB a3 c0 VW(RI He2a Cal HZ 6 r 2 BEN! BB YPZaNtJT SFTp CA a FLAME THFANEE REDBUD 2•DBH BB v 31a6„nad ... FareRFamy2 FCER6T PANBV REDBUB • BBH BB pp ♦"Na14'onon plan indmatas Ere u,uimtl An ,o R,rd removel olrs,t lB treq u[Ifuld A1PV W6S s)l4tl BE NUNS ERY MATCHED; OIIPLIY S PECIMEN. �XEM NUMBER L1.10 MJ z z z a�g MJ N ZL 1 'o J w 5 a r � J z Z > a } p 2 F vu u w z f �O 2 a Bn V �XEM NUMBER L1.10 z z MJ o_ O J z u aU Jg =w a �w a3 r a s v 0 �uz Go �XEM NUMBER L1.10 GENERAL LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES: 01 CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OFANY WORK, CONTACT IOWA ONE CALL (1-800-292-8989) AT LEAST48 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING. REPAIR DAMAGE TO UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IMMEDIATELY. G2 PRIORTO PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION, THE LANDSCAPEOR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE PLANT LOCATIONS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF PROPOSED PLANT LOCATIONS LISTED ON PLAN MAY BE REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL INTERFERENCE WITH EXISTING OR RELOCATED UTILITIES OR IMPROVE MAINTENANCE CONDITIONS. 03 PRI O R TO INSTALLATION, ALL TREE PLANTING LOCATIONS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE DEUNEATED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PROJ ECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CONTACTTHE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE ONE WEEK PRIOR TO ANTICIPATED PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION DATE FOR FINAL LAYOUT APPROVAL. 04 ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL AT LEAST MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE"AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" (ANSI Z60.1 -LATEST EDITION), 05 PLANT QUANTITIES ARE FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. DRAWINGS SHALL PREVAIL WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. 06 NO PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBSTITUTED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 07 BED PREPARATION AND MULCHING NOTES: IMPORTED TOPSOIL, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE: FERTILE, FRIABLE, NATURAL TOPSOIL, WITH A CLAY CONTENT NOT EXCEEDING 30% AND ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT NOT LESS THAN 5% FREE FROM LUMPS, COARSE SANDS, STONES, ROOTS, STICKS, AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL, WITH ACIDITY RANGE OF BETWEEN Ph 6.0 and 5.8. 08 PLANTING SOIL: PLANTING SOIL (i.e. BACKFILL AREAS AROUND ROOT BALLS AS SHOWN ON TREEISHRUB INSTALLATION DETAIL) SHALL BE AMENDED, THOROUGHLY MIX 4 PARTSTOPSOIL,1 PART COMPOST,1 PARTSAND. TOPSOIL SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED WITHIN THE NOTE ABOVE. COMPOST SHALL BE FINELY SCREENED GRADED TO PASS SIEVE AS FOLLOWS: -MINIMUM OF 85% BEING 1/4" OR SMALLER (DRY BASIS RESULT). -MINIMUM OF 70% BEING 5/32" OR SMALLER (DRY BASIS RESULT(. -WITH CLUMPS OR PARTICLES 3/4" DIAMETER OR GREATER. SAND SHALL BE C33 WASHED CONCRETE SAND, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 09 UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALLGRASS/PERENNIAL MASSINGS ARETO BE EVENLYSPACED IN TRIANGULAR PATTERN ARRANGEMENT. 10 PRIORTO MULCHING ALL PLANING BED AREAS, APPLY COMMERCIALGRADE PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL), PER MANUFACTURE'S DmECTIONS,TO ALL PLANTING BEDS. 11 PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN ALLTREE PLANTING BEDS. 12 PROVIDE 2"DEPTH MIN. OFSHREDDED HARDWOOD AND/OR RIVER ROCK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB/ORNAMENTAL GRASS/PERENNIAL BEDS. 13 PROVIDE ALL TREES WITH A MINIMUM 3" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH RINGS FOR TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM SIX FOOT IS') DIAMETER AND CONTAIN SPADE EDGING AT MULCH RING EDGE 14 PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION, DO NOTALLOW ADDITION OFTOPSOIL, PLANTING SOIL OR MULCHTO DETER POSITIVE DRAINAGE OR TO CREATE AREA OF LOCALIZED PONDING. 15 NURSERY TAGS SHALL BE LEFT ON PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS COMPLETED THE INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. 16 CONTAINER GROWN STOCK SHALL HAVE THE CONTAINER REMOVED AND. THE ROOT BALL CUTTHROUGH THE SURFACE IN TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. 17 ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND. ALLROOTWRAPPING MATERIAL MADE OF SYNTHETICS OR PLASTICS SHALL BE REMOVED ATTIME OF PLANTING. 18 AS NEEDED, STAKE ALL NEWLY PLANTED TREES RELATIVE TO WIND EXPOSURE. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SET PLUMB TO GROUND AND FACED FOR. BEST APPEARANCE. AS NECESSARY, PRUNE DEAD BRANCHES OR THOSE THAT COMPROMISE APPEARANCE AND STRUCTURE TO A MAX OF 1/3 THE PLANT. 19 CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER AND MAINTAIN ALL SODDED AREAS AS WELL AS ALL PLANTS UNTIL GROUND FREEZES. MAINTENANCE INCLUDES WEEDING, MULCHING, AND OTHER NECESSARY RELATED OPERATIONS UNTIL INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. INITIAL ACCEPTANCE 15 CONSIDERED TO BE THE DATE AT WHICH PLANTING AND MULCHING, ETC., PER LANDSCAPE PLAN, HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE 20 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN VIGOROUS GROWING CONDITIONS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM DATE OF INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. 21 ALL PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE DEAD OR IN AN UNHEALTHY OR UNSIGHTLY STATE ARE REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COSTTO THE OWNER FOR UP TO ONE YEAR OF INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. 22 SURFACE RESTORATION FOR ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE TURF GRASS LAWN SOD, WITH AN ALTERNATE OPTION TO BE TURF GRASS LAWN SEED. ALL SEED& 500 APPLICATION NOTES ARE LISTED SEPARATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION& INSTALLATION. FOR ALL SURFACE RESTORATION, PLANTING PRACTICES, AND ANY OTHER LANDSCAPING WORK NOT ADDRESSED VIA MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW IOWA SODAS SPECIFICATIONS DIVISION 09: SITE WORK AND LANDSCAPING OF IOWA. SOD/SEED APPLICATION NOTES: 01 IF TURF GRASS LAWN SEED ALTERNATE 15 USED IN UEU OF SOD, ALL SEEDING APPLICATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY UNITED SEEDS INC, OR APPROVED EQUAL 02 ALL TURF GRASS LAWN AREAS, WHETHER SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ARE TO BE PLANTED AND INSTALLED AS PER THE TECHNICAL BULLETIN' FOR'SOD GROWER II KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLEND' PROVIDED BY UNITED SEEDS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. TECHNICAL BULLETIN FOR'SOD GROWER it KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS BLENO' CAN BE FOUND ON THE UNITED SEEDS WEBSITE: www.untedseeds.com 83 ALL TU RF GRASS SOD TO BE OF THE SAM E PERFOR MANCE QUALITY AND SPECIES TYPE OF TH E'SOD GROWER II KENTUCKY BLU EGRASS BLEND' PROVIDED BY UNITED SEEDS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLUEGRASS VARIETIES SHALL INCLUDE: 'CONCERTO', 'NO BLUE% rBEYON D', AND 'EVEREST'. CONTACT INFO: United Seeds Inc. 1800 Dixon Ave, Suite A Des Moines, IA 50316 Ph: 1-800.365-6674 Web: www.unitedseeds.com STAKING NOTES: TREE & SHRUB PLANTING NOTES: DO TREE STAKING SHALL ONLY BE USED IF NOTED, IN HIGH WIND AREAS, OR AREAS OF HEAVY ADJACENT PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC. 01 STAKING WIRE THROUGH RUBBER HOSE SET LOOSE TO ALLOW FOR TRUNK TAPER AND DETRIMENTAL GROWTH. TREE SHOULD ALLOW LIMITED MOVEMENT. 02. STEEL FENCE POST STAKE DRIVEN INSIDE MULCH RING DIAMETER. DRIVE STAKES V-0" INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL BELOW ROOTBALL. 03 REMOVE WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP ONCE PLACED INTO PLANTING HOLE. REMOVE ALL SISAL AND SYNTHETIC TWINE. 04 TRUNK FLARE SHOULD BE EXPOSED BEFORE DETERMINING PLANTING HOLE DEPTH. PLANT TREE WITH TRUNK FLARE 1-2" MAXIMUM ABOVE ORIGINAL GRADE, AVOID PLANTING TREE TOO DEEPLY. 05 PLANTING HOLE TO BE AT M INIMUM 3 TIMES TH E WI DTH OF FOOTBALL AT SOIL SURFACE, SLOPING TO THE WIDTH OF R00T BALL AT BASE. PLANTING HOLE WIDTH NEAR SURFACE 15 I NCREASED TOS TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOTBALL WHEN SOILS ARE HIGHLY COMPACTED OR HEAVY IN CLAY CONTENT. 06 .SCARIFY PLANTING HOLE TO HELP ELIMINATE THE CREATION OF A 501L INTERFACE. 07 PLACE ROOTBALL ON COMPACTED& LEVELED SO BGRADE. 08 REMOVE EXIST' NG SOI L FROM EXCAVATED PLANTING PIT AND REPLACE WITH PLANTING SOIL WHILE BACKFIW NG, WORK PLANTING SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL TO MINIMIZE LARGE AIR POCKETS AND ENSURE BETTER VERTICAL SUPPORT. 09 AVOI D MOUNDI NG MU LCH& MAKI NG CONTACT WITH TRU N C FORM 2-3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH RING SAUCER TO HELP HOLD WATER DURING ESTABLISHMENT. DIAMETER OF MULCH AREA SHOO LD BE KEPT CLEAR OF GRASS, WEEDS, ETC. TO REDUCE COMPETITION WITH TREE ROOTS. 10 UNDISTURBED SOIL. 11 ONLY LIGHTLY PRUNE AND REMOVE DAMAGED OR DEAD BRANCHES. 12 SPADE EDGING, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. 13 REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANT SPACING, LOCATIONS. 14 6" MINI MUM WIDER HOLE THAN CONTAINER ON ALL SIDES. w N J_ Z F- a N F 'o J � 0 w 5 Q } K a J z Z>_ O a } F a U J 0O 2 F Vw U w f IY F w � 2 a uwi �l7 L1.20 N J_ a F w N V � 0 O a J z O z F a U J aZ O a3w w IY F w � W 0 Z G C) N L1.20 LEGEND —E c0 3P5 I t PA /,q�� PROPERTY LINSET r L t OC R O PROPERTY SETBACK J m 1OM �/ 0WATER N 2 OR 20M TELECOM Z B 0� / OI .• ...._ 3 M%P O o o GAS I 92 PO ppp 1 WF I E E ELECTRIC � 10C wi s°ry ggNITMY6EWER 3 GD 41V 3 f °A .° .° STORM SEWEREXIST- 3 2TD I TREE REASEMENT w I / 2ID 1. TREE PROTECTION FENCING 1 2GT � p 2CR / 4 1 RL 3GD - 995 - EXISTING CONTOUR I / 3RZ SCG I TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION I / O TAG O EASEMENT O O 1 MS O I 1 CO I srvnDE TREE EVERGREEN TREE 1WF O 1rL 2THRIJBI NT 1 CR R OR 000 PERENNIAL O ORNAMENTALTREE I I t / .'� ' / .. 21 PO t PA TURFGRA55 M TALL SCUE/SHORT GRASS O a 1 OM I GRASS PRAIRIE MIX 1 CG 3TC L I iM9 Z O Z o SAG 1 co o & / I /1 MA 1 PA 23 BB I 2PA 1 / 2CR / 2 MA I I 2 1 GT G 1sR O� / - / 1 MA PO O 1 CG (Dj.\/� 3 PG 1C0 1 MA / 1 0 tOC / 9 D anO 4TC 6M%P / 4' 1 GT T 1 aT � " I w Z I I I 2ST I 1 O I Q Q YDK DK d tGT 1CO w d N Y / I 9ST QJ O Q K I / O Hv� 3MxP r Q> d' J I 21 JH3rD 3aro �I H Of Q Q w = Of 3/OI O } W N N O t BBB 8BB 1MXS z 20 I � 1Gr - 9JH I I 2 w z U D STD 1HE rOK YDK 36 sT 3z sr 01 - _3MXS 3MX5 _ 24 DK �/ 1 32GO 40 DN HV 40 OK 29 JH � a_ o \ --F- - - REFERTO L100FOR I Q W J STREET TREE SPECIES genus Z d W jI 3 \� I �� 1 ----- - landscape architects ] > Q -a � a C) of 0 0� 0 �� 325 EAST 5T6 STREET Z `= H Z Z Oi DES MOINES, IA 50309 O UDO p J 6 0 T 515 284 1010 J SHEE1NUMBER: _ I WWW GENUS TA COM � L3.00 d PLANTING NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO PLANTING AND SHALL REPORT ANY CONFLICTS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES. 4. IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE NUMBER OF PLANTS ON PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 5. ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ANSI Z 60.1, OR LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO THE A.S.N.S. 6. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTE PLANT MATERIAL TYPE, SIZE, AND/OR QUANTITY. 8. STAKE LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED PLANTING FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PLANTING. 9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO OPERATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PER PLAN. ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 10. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUS TO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING SOIL. 11. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, TREES TO BE CENTERED IN PLANTING AREAS. 12. TO AVOID DISRUPTION TO EXISTING TREES, HAND DIGGING REQUIRED WITHIN DRIP LINE OF TREES. NO TREE ROOTS OVER 1" IN DIAMETER ARE TO BE CUT. 13. PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH, NATURAL COLOR, IN ALL PLANT SAUCERS AND PLANTING BEDS TO A 3 -INCH MAXIMUM DEPTH. APPLY PRE -EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 14. NEW TREES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PLANT BEDS, SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET AWAY FROM PLANT BED. 15. NO TREES OR SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN 5' FROM ANY UTILITY SERVICE VALVE, BASED ON ANTICIPATED TRUNK SIZE. OVERSTORY TREES QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 2 WF ABIES CONCOLOR WHITE FIR 6'-8' HT B&B AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 6 CR CARPINUS CAROLINIANA AMERICAN HORNBEAM 2" CAL. B&B 2" CAL. 6 CO CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2" CAL. B&B B&B MULTI -STEM 8 GT GLIDETSIA TRICANTHOS'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST 2" CAL. B&B 7 11 GD GYMNOCLADUS DIOCUS'ESPRESSO' ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE 2" CAL. B&B SR 8 MA MACCKIA AMURENSIS AMUR MAAKIA 2" CAL. B&B VX 6' 1 NS NYSSA SYLVANTICA BLACK TUPELO 2" CAL. B&B VX 4.5' 5 PA PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE 6'-8' HT B&B 4'X 4' 3 PG PICEA CLAUCA'DENSATA' BLACK HILLS SPRICE 6'-8' HT B&B TX 3' 3 PS PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE 6'-8' HT B&B 2'X 3' 3 QC QUERCUS COCCINEA SCARLET OAK 2" CAL. B&B 4'X 6' 4 QM QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2" CAL. B&B 10 TC TSUGA CANADENSIS EASTERN HEMLOCK 6'-8' HT B&B CC SHRUBS QTY ORNAMENTAL TREES BOTANICAL COMMON QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 5 AG AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 6 CG CRATEGUS CRUS-GALLI VAR. INERMIS THORNLESS COCKSPIR HAWTHRON 2" CAL. B&B 2 MS MAGNOLIA X SOULANGEANA SAUCER MAGNOLIA 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 12 MXP MALUS'PRAIRIE FIRE' PRAIRIE FIRE CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 7 MXS MALUS'SPRING SNOW' SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 3 SR SYRINGA RETICULATA SSP. RETICULATA'IVORY SILK' IVORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2" CAL. B&B SHRUBS QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT MATURE SIZE (HT. X WIDTH) 23 BB CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS BUTTONBUSH #1 CONT. 6'X 5' 175 DK DIERVILLA WODIAK ORANGE' KODIAK ORANGE DIERVILLA 18" HT CONT. 4'X 4' 6 HV HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA WITCH HAZEL 6' HT CONT 10' X 8' 16 BB HYDRANGEA PAN ICULATA'ILVOBO' PP#22,782 BOBO HARDY HYDRANGEA #3 CONT. ITX 4' 7 IV ITEA VIRGINICA LITTLE HENRY SWEETSPIRE #3 CONT. TX 3' 69 JH JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS'HUGHES' HUGHES JUNIPER #3 CONT. VX 6' 146 PO PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NINEBARK #1 CONT VX 4.5' 3 RL RHODODENDRON X'LANDMARK' LANDMARK RHODODENDRON #3 CONT. 4'X 4' 90 ST SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA'TOR' TOR SPIREA #3 CONT. TX 3' 3 BZ SPIRAEA MEDIA DOUBLE PLAY BLUE KAZOO SPIREA #3 CONT. 2'X 3' 25 TD TAXUS X MEDIA'DENSIFORMIS' DENSE SPREADING YEW 48" HT CONT. 4'X 6' genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 W W W.GENUS-LA.COM w z z w a 0 zz x U LL O z 0 a UV w 0 N W w Z a co o w CL N W 0 w J — } U L10 Q w 06 z N > w �0�� H z Y J N G U w Z w — w 0 2 d N a J ISHEETNUMBER: Uj L3.01 w N Lu a 0 z � w0 2 U J W w J W U L10 06 N w H O Z LU J Q CC U M Z z HZ Z _w0 LUQ J ISHEETNUMBER: Uj L3.01 w N Lu a 0 z � w0 2 U J W 0 m J m EDGE OF PLANTING AREA z 1/2 O.C. N OO Q SPACING Z 0 [L'o ( ) I 0 SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH z PLANT CENTER 0 GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE (J u CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. 0 SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, O 2" THICKNESS SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, x 2" THICKNESS of Q ROOTBALL FINISH GRADE z Z 3/16" x 4" STEEL EDGING, GALVANIZED /\\j % BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE IROO LL 5 PERENNIAL PLANTING OVERSTORY TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE w a SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE n w BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL u zUNDISTURBED SUBGRADE Z VIII ROO LL < o O U 2 EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH w GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE N 1 1/2X ROOTBALL LU Z Q C'6 Q ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING N 3 NOT TO SCALE LU Q J LU Q } Q U z w = SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH } Z > GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE w - W W CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. z J N a 0 SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, w C> LLU Z z 2" THICKNESS _ d N (D a u FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE V III IROOI ILL III SHRUB PLANTING NOTTO SCALE J N z J o N W genus � o w z [ landscape architects ] a �� 0 o rn o � 325 EAST 5TH STREET z z H Z Z I DES MOINES, IA 50309 Q LU Q O W � W = J N J r'4 a T 515 284 1010 J SHEET NUMBER: WWW.GENUS-LA.COM W L3.02 Feb 10, 2021 - 3:27pm Z:\Projects2\20042-IC SENIOR LIVING\04 CAD\03 Current\20042-DT_SITE DETAILS.dwg ParksA7o-�n- 11mird Recrea • TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Juli Seydell Johnson, Director of Parks & Recreation Tyler Baird, Superintendent of Parks & Forestry DATE: March 17, 2021 RE: Staff Recommendation for Acquiring Outlot A of Hickory Trail Estates for Neighborhood Open Space Parks and Recreation staff recommends the acceptance of Outlot A of Hickory Trail Estates to satisfy Neighborhood Open Space requirements while increasing the size of Hickory Hill Park. This recommendation is based upon the high quality of the woodlands which the City wishes to preserve and manage. In addition, because the area is connected to Hickory Hill Park, it will add to the eco diversity of the park and provide additional area for public recreation. As proposed, Outlot A of the Hickory Trail Estates Concept Plan would add 11.66 acres of land to Hickory Hill Park. This would increase the total park acres from approximately 186 to 198 acres. Staff does not intend to use this acquired area as public active use recreation area, but rather as a passive use nature area, as is much of Hickory Hill Park. Management activities will focus on restoration and preservation of the savannah woodlands and wetland area. The parcel has ecological integrity since it has never been cleared for development or used heavily for agriculture. The addition includes areas of savannah woodlands that were prevalent in the area before development. Hickory Hill Park preserves this ecosystem while providing the public with a natural area to quietly hike and explore. Outlot A is consistent with the character and of a quality equal to or greater than other sections of the park. The wetland in Outlot A further increases the ecosystem diversity of the park. The preservation of the land could be accomplished through a conservation easement. However, staff recommends dedication to the City due to the location next to Hickory Hill Park. Public ownership will easily allow for ecological management and restoration, as has been happening in recent years throughout Hickory Hill Park. Another benefit of acquiring Outlot A is that access to Hickory Hill Park will be increased by the long stretch of park frontage planned along Hickory Trail. This access includes two trail entry points that link to the existing trail system in the park. Early in the development process, staff was also asked to consider dedication of Outlot B. Staff did not recommend acquiring this area because it did not have a connection to the larger park, has topography that would make maintenance very difficult and does not contain the remnant high value trees and wetland found in Outlot A. The acceptance of Outlot A is contingent upon approval of a Woodland Management Plan that shall consist of a plan to remove any invasive species within the Outlot A area, as well as removal of any hazardous trees or limbs. The plan shall be prepared by a woodland specialist and approved by the City Forrester. Invasive species removal will be the responsibility of the owner and must be completed prior to transfer of Outlot A to the City. From: JOE CLARK To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Cc: Mike Welch; Jacob Wolfgang Subject: Hickory Trail Estates - Comments from Development Team Date: Monday, March 15, 20218:40:49 AM Attachments: Outlook-blkfcbmu.ona RJSS'4 Anne & Ray - Please consider the following comments from our Hickory Trail Estates Development Team: 1. Claim: Project does not protect viewsheds of the park. -Those who spoke in opposition of the project provided no proof of this at the meeting but only spoke in matter of fact terms. -Architects & Engineers of the project contend that due to the steep slopes at the edge of the park, our site is not visible from the park. As an overarching theme, the Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan state that environmental protection is a basic tenet of the plans. "Growth and development should be managed such that the environmental quality of the community is not sacrificed. Measures should be taken in all private and public projects to ensure that any impacts on regulated environmental features are minimized." Comprehensive Plan, Pg. 19. Similarly, the NE District Plan states that "protecting the environmental quality of the district is a high priority' and that preserving natural features is one of the backbones of the NE District Plan. To this end, the Conservation Neighborhood Design is recommended in the Bluffwood Neighborhood quadrant (where the subject property is located), especially in areas characterized by a topography of steep, wooded ravines. However, the standards and recommendations set forth in the Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan are merely guidelines, not legal requirements. "The land use scenarios are intended to be general guides; an indication of how development may occur neighborhood by neighborhood. It is possible that specific land uses shown on the land use scenario may not develop in the exact locations depicted, but decision regarding development should adhere generally to the planning principles set forth in this plan." NE District Plan, Pg. 11. As such, deviations from the criteria set forth in the plans can be appropriate and acceptable in certain instances. To the first contention of the Friends of Hickory Hill Park regarding the viewshed of the Park, the NE District Plan does call for some sort of buffering between Hickory Hill Park and the subject property in an attempt to minimize the visibility of residential development from the Park and to preserve the natural integrity of the park. Pgs. 8, 15, and 17. A definition of what constitutes buffering is not given in the Comprehensive Plan or the NE District Plan, leaving much room for interpretation. Nevertheless, the Commission determined (as set forth in the staff report) that the development will not adversely affect views any more than would a conventional development. Staff Report, Pg. 6. There are sufficient separation distances from the Park and the condominiums and senior living facility, with the down slope from these properties lessening the visual effect on the Park, and trees can also be used to soften this transition to the east. The proposed homes also have a 35' to 263' buffer with the existing Park boundary (this does not include the additional buffer from trees on the Hickory Hill park side of the property). While a few homes may be visible from the Park, the staff determined that the placement of these homes will not adversely affect light, air or privacy anymore than a conventional development. This buffer should allow for sufficient viewshed protection. It sounds like this was not one of the major concerns of the Commission, but if there continues to be disputes from the Commission or Friends of Hickory Hill Park regarding this point, a mixture of trees could be proposed along the rear yards to provide additional screening from the Park's view. The Developer also has offered to lose 6 single family lots (over 500 feet of frontage) on the west side of the development in efforts to accommodate this viewshed issue. Lastly, City Staff has put most emphasis on providing a buffer and extra access points into the park more than they have on the single loaded street issue. These two issues are thoroughly addressed in the current plan. 2. Claim: Project does not use cul-de-sacs - Cul-de-sacs are not mandated for all residential roads in this plan, only where necessary to protect sensitive slopes. We agree that cul-de-sacs are not warranted in this development (and it appears the Commission does as well). The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of interconnected streets. It further explicitly states (without qualification) that "Cul-de-sacs are discouraged." Pg. 39; see also Section 15-3-2A-4 of City Code ("Use of cul-de-sacs and other roadways with a single point of access should be avoided. Cul-de-sacs will be considered where it can be clearly demonstrated that environmental constraints, existing development, access limitations along arterial streets or other unusual features prevent the extension of the street to the property line or to interconnect with other streets within or abutting the subdivision."). Likewise, the NE District Plan encourages streets that enhance neighborhood quality through street design that foster reasonable traffic levels, calm traffic, and provide landscape buffers along major roadways by developing interconnected street systems that disperses vehicular traffic by using multiple means of access into and out of a neighborhood. Opposite of the assertions of the Friends of Hickory Hill Park, "cul-de-sac streets [should be used only] on a limited basis, such as where topography or other sensitive features prevent practical street connections." Pg. 10. Further, "interconnected streets are proposed where feasible" in the Bluffwood Neighborhood. Pg. 13. However, the NE District Plan does state that "to preserve sensitive areas, cul-de-sac streets and single -loaded streets are proposed where appropriate." Pgs. 13 and 16-17. Based on the staff report from the Commission, it appears the Commission is comfortable with the through street proposed by the developer. "Staff encourages connectivity within this neighborhood and supports the idea of having a continuous street extension in this area instead of two separate cul-de-sacs. The City subdivision code allows cul-de-sacs when it is can be demonstrated that streets cannot be continued. The applicant has demonstrated that this street can continue and connect with Scott Blvd." Staff Report, Pg. 4. "The applicant has demonstrated that a through street can be provided in this location without impacting the protected slopes to the east of the proposed street extension, or the wetlands that exist on the property." Staff Report, Pg. 8. 3. Claim: Project does not use single loaded streets. -Single loaded streets are only required in certain circumstances. This would mean that double loaded streets can also be used in certain circumstances. In an effort to improve overall access to and awareness of parks, the Comprehensive Plan "discourages parks that are surrounded by private property, and encourages development of parks with single -loaded streets." Pg. 47. Similarly, in an effort to preserve natural features, the NE District Plan "encourages the use of single -loaded streets when necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas and create public vistas." Pg. 8. Single -loaded streets used "to open up scenic vistas and provide public access to preserved natural areas" are also encouraged under the NE District Plan. Pg. 9. The NE District Plan further states that, in connection with the Bluffwood Neighborhood, "to preserve sensitive areas [such as areas containing wooded ravines and stream corridors], cul-de-sac streets and single -loaded streets are proposed where appropriate." Pgs. 13 and 16-17. However, as you are already aware, these are merely guidelines and not absolutes that must be adhered to for all development near parks. It is important to point out that the guideline of encouraging single -loaded streets is set forth in the plans as an effort to improve access to and awareness of parks, to protect environmentally sensitive areas, and to create public vistas. A deviation from the encouraged guidelines in the plans would be appropriate in instances where these goals can be achieved in other ways. Further, these are recommended guidelines (not requirements) only for situations "where appropriate." Based on a developer's proposed development and layout, there could be situations where a single -loaded road would not be appropriate and more detrimental than a double -loaded road. In support of the proposition that single -loaded roads are not appropriate in this instance, we make the following notes: • Access to and awareness of Hickory Hill Park will be increased in other ways by the proposed development (rather than using single -loaded roads), including Developer's dedication of open space to the Park which will result in the Park increasing in size by 11.35 acres and having street frontage along N. Scott Blvd. These are the underlying considerations in the plans, and the proposed development will not discourage or prohibit access to the Park, but will instead increase access and availability to the public. The current "unauthorized" park trails that allow a person to enter the ACT land without permission will now become two additional "legitimate" park trail entrances for patrons of the park to frequent any time. A pocket park with vehicle parking could be added near these trails if the City chooses to do so in the future. The developer's are in strong support of increasing access to Hickory Hill Park and have made that one of their focal points of the project. • The map of the Bluffwood Neighborhood (Pg. 14 of the NE District Plan) and the map of a Conservation Neighborhood Design (Pg. 12 of NE District Plan) both show some single - loaded roads in the vicinity of the Park, but also double -loaded roads as well. As such, it would be contrary to the terms of the NE District Plan to require single -loaded roads for the entirety of the proposed development. At a minimum, a partially single -loaded street on the west side of the development should be acceptable by the Commission and City staff. The Developer has given up 40% of the single family lots (6 of 15 lots in question) on the west side of the development in efforts to provide a partially single -loaded street in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan. • As noted above, single -loaded roads are "encouraged where appropriate." Considering the squeeze from Outlots A and B (which are necessary to preserve other environmental conditions), single -loaded streets in this area would likely make development financially unfeasible, and as such would not be appropriate in this instance. The loss of 6 additional single family lots has already put a financial strain on the project. • While "environment" is one of the key elements of the Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan considers two other inter -related factors (along with environment) that create healthy and thriving communities, namely economy and society. As such, focusing on only the environmental concerns and ignoring the economic and societal impacts that the development will have is an unfair and incomplete analysis. For example, one of the main visions of the Comprehensive Plan is to create and provide attractive and affordable housing for all people (including singles, couples, families with children, and elderly people). "By allowing for a mix of housing types, moderately priced housing can be incorporated into a neighborhood, rather than segregated in one or two areas of the community." Indeed, one of the housing goals under the Comprehensive Plan encourages a diversity of housing options in all neighborhoods by "ensuring a mix of housing types within each neighborhood, to provide options for households of all types (singles, families, retirees, etc.) and people of all incomes." The Comprehensive Plan also identifies that population growth indicates the need for more homes, condominiums and apartments throughout the city, including in locations "close to recreation." The NE District Plan likewise seeks to encourage reasonable levels of housing diversity by using traditional neighborhood design to locate various housing types near parks and upgrading neighborhood parks by improving or expanding existing public parks and open space areas for neighborhood use. The Bluffwood Neighborhood contemplates a variety of housing options, all adjacent to major open spaces. Additionally the project would bring employment to many in the community and increases the City's tax base by up to $1,000,000.00 annually once it is fully built -out. The proposed development satisfies all these economic and societal goals and provides significant benefit to the community as well as allowing additional access to and use of the park by new individuals. Developer is proposing to gift approximately 23.28% of the total development site (11.35 acres out of 48.75 acres), which would extend the existing boundaries of Hickory Hill Park and increase the total Park acreage by approximately 5.5%. It would also allow the Park to have street frontage along N. Scott Blvd. (which increases visibility and use of the Park, as well as increased access by the public). Developer is also taking other measures to preserve environmentally sensitive areas on the property (see Outlot B). These are significant environmental benefits that will preserve the environmental integrity of the property into the future. • Overall, the Staff Report supports the development and states that it satisfies the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan ("It provides an interconnected street system, incorporates a variety of housing types, limits impact to sensitive areas, and provides an additional 11.35 acres of land to Hickory Hill Park."). It would be helpful for City Staff to highlight and emphasize the many other benefits that will be created by this wonderful development, rather than focusing on the one issue that is (arguably) being partially satisfied by the development team. Please share these comments with your staff and P&Z Commission. Thank you, Joe Clark Commercial Realty Iowa City, LLC 221 E. Burlington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 Cell: (319) 631-1894 / Office: (515) 519 -LAND Licensed Real Estate Broker in Iowa C R *J COMMERCIAL REALTY TAMARACK IPI W! My RIDGE AST® Janet E. Godwin Chief Executive Officer March 15, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Iowa City 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission Members: We have read the reports and the notes of the Planning and Zoning (P&Z) commission meeting on February 1&. Our reaction, in a word — disappointing. ACT purchased the subject property, known as the Larson property at the time, in 2008. Jeff Larson approached ACT to gauge any interest we might have in developing the property. While we had no interest in expanding the ACT campus onto the Larson property, we purchased the property with the intention of eventually selling it to the "right' developer at the "right" time. At the time ACT purchased the property, certain senior staff of ACT met with citizens interested in Hickory Hill. They wanted to better understand ACT's intentions regarding the property. ACT communicated to that group that 1) it had no intention of ever developing the property itself, 2) the property would be sold — eventually—to a developer, and 3) ACT had no intention of donating the property to either a land trust or the City, but that concerned citizens could purchase the property if they so desired. In addition to those items, ACT stated that it would consider stop using the property for row crop purposes, and invited members to future discussions on how that would come about. Since that time ACT has, in fact, ceased using the property for row crop use and converted it to hay ground. The hay helps keep invasive species and erosion to a minimum. We've been good —and consistent— neighbors to the city, the park, and the surrounding developments. After 12 years of ownership, ACT believes it had found the "right" developer to develop the property at the "right" time. ACT is not interested in continuing to hold this property indefinitely. Mr. Clark's plan has clearly met the intent and spirit of both the Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan. Mr. Clark has made numerous revisions to his plan and obtained the City's recommendation to approve prior to the most recent P&Z meeting. Mr. Clark has also worked in good faith with community members including the Friends of Hickory Hill Park. As we understand it, a point of contention is that Mr. Clark's plan proposes some double -sided streets as well as single -sided streets. As you know, neither the Comprehensive Plan nor the NE District Plan require new developments to exclusively have single -sided streets. In fact, double sided streets are the 500 ACT Ddve P.O.6ox 168 Iowa City, Iowa 52243-0168 ianet.codwiNilact.orc www.act.org Planning and Zoning Commission March 15, 2021 Page Two norm in the neighborhoods directly adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. Imposing a requirement for all new developments to have primarily single -sided streets would have the unintended consequence of doubling urban sprawl, devaluing the land, and making development financially unfeasible. In a continued effort to alleviate concerns, Mr. Clark's latest proposal has eliminated an additional six single family lots in efforts to increase buffers and alleviate viewshed concerns. In the spirit of preserving the character of the area, Mr. Clark's plan has considerably more buffer than required. ACT's land is currently being used as a de facto extension of Hickory Hill Park. There are walking trails worn on our land and portions of our fences have been removed... not by ACT. Should the developer not be allowed to develop the property as proposed and the property reverts back to ACT, ACT will take steps to ensure this trespassing activity stops. Additionally, we will be required to find alternative uses for this land — including potentially converting it back to crop land. I am writing to the P&Z commission at this time to express our full support for Mr. Clark's development. As neighbors and as owners of the property, we have always been concerned with how this area is developed. That's why we purchased the property in the first place — and why we are choosing to sell it to Mr. Clark now. Please proceed to approve the Clark development — it has our full support. Sincerely, V Janet E. Godwin Chief Executive Officer cc: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Bruce Teague, Mayor Joe Clark From: Jason Napoli To: Raymond Heitner Cc: Anne Russett Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Friday, March 12, 20215:02:36 PM Attachments: imaae001.Dna image005.g_ng imaae004.Dna image003.g_ng imaae002.Dna ■ R4SE( Greetings Ray - Thank you for reconnecting with this. My initial thoughts about this come from many angles. The first being how the public finds out about this at the close of business on a Friday with less than a week before the meeting. A meeting being held during our community's spring break. The bias the city planners have toward this project have disadvantaged the opposed since the good neighbor meeting back in December. Initial feedback was never shared with the Commission, rezoning signage was poorly placed and now, after being shut down less than a month ago, we find ourselves with less than a week's notice before this goes before P&Z again. Have the minutes from the meeting last month when this went in front of P&Z even been published yet? The public should have more time to respond and more information about the previous meeting. Lots 28-41 remain unacceptable. The Commission endured hours of public feedback. The Commission told the developer to come back with single -loaded streets. Removing lots from the middle is a good start, but having those lots 28-36 still against the 1st Ave. Loop trail and then heading north defeats the purpose. I ask you to share these initial thoughts with the Commission and reconsider having this on next week's agenda with such short notice and one of the few weeks of the year more people in our community are on vacation than most other times of the year. Thank you again, Jason Napoli Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPh On Friday, March 12, 2021, 17:05, Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> wrote: All, The applicant for the Hickory Trail Estates rezoning has submitted an updated OPD Plan. This plan will be discussed at next week's Planning and Zoning th Commission meeting on Thursday, March 18 at 7pm. The meeting's agenda packet can be found here: https://www.icgoy.org/city- government/boards/planning-and-zoning-commission The Zoom link for the meeting can be found here: https: //zoom. us/meeting/re,gister/tJMtceCrgzM-jGtHRYdNFfGxUsOm 1 baWmr681 Please send me any correspondence you would like forwarded to the Commission. Thank you, Ray Heitner Associate Planner (he/him/his) 319.356.5238 rUrnond-heitner&i owa-city. org 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 0 IW CITY L UIe ES[A Clic of tlr;2AT"kE WWW.ICGOV.ORG Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. From: Russo, Andrew F To: Raymond Heitner Cc: Maureen Russo Subject: Re: [External] Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Sunday, March 14, 20213:18:52 PM Attachments: imaae001.ona imaoe002.pnng imaae003.ona imaae004.pnn(i imaae005.ona RI$H Thanks Ray for the heads up. Could you please forward the following comments/requests to the commission for consideration? 1. Removal of the homes that closely abutted the park is a great change that makes the plan closer to the vision that was designed to protect the park. While ideally, some more would be removed on that side of the street, this removes the ones that would have had the most impact. Thanks. 2. It was mentioned at the last meeting that the Parks Dept did not want Outlot B. Is the developer willing to donate that to the city? If so, that would be fantastic in my opinion and should warrant discussion as to why Parks said no. Can the P+Z still make that recommendation to include Outlot B for public access? As a frequent user of the park, the ability to explore up that ravine would be an excellent addition to the park that would also decompress pressure on the rest of the park. 3. Should we be able to set aside Outlot B, then my final request for consideration is to include a small right of way access at the crosswalk planned at the trailhead, around lot 17, to allow hikers to loop from the current park to Outlot B and down to the other entry point at the bottom of the hill next to lot 28. Thank you for forwarding these requests. Andy Russo From: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Date: Friday, March 12, 2021 at 4:06 PM To: "Parker, Adam G" <adam-parker@uiowa.edu>, "Weis, Adam J" <adam+ weis@uiowa.edu>, "'allisonjaynes@gmail.com"' <allisonjaynes@gmail.com>, "Russo, Andrew F" <andrew-russo@uiowa.edu>, "Synan, Ann" <ann-synan@uiowa.edu>, "'asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com"' <asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com>, "'b3n.berger@gmail.com"' <b3n.berger@gmail.com>, "'bamcquillen@gmail.com"' <bamcquillen@gmail.com>, "'brian.lehmann@icloud.com"' <brian.lehmann@icloud.com>, "'hickoryhiker@gmail.com"' <hickoryhiker@gmail.com>, "'clbuckingham@gmail.com"' <clbuckingham@gmail.com>, `cjkohrt@gmail.com"' <cjkohrt@gmail.com>, "'darcy128@aol.com"' <darcy128@aol.com>, From: Ben Beraer To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Monday, March 15, 20219:54:45 AM Attachments: imaae001.g_ng image002.g_ng imacje003.pnng image004.g_ng imacje005.pnng I Thank you for sending this along. I still feel that there is too much disruption to the environment with the amended plan. If I remember correctly it was asked that the developers recommend a plan with housing along one side of the road only. However, unless I am reading it incorrectly, this plan is still proposing houses on both sides. I would suggest that the developers return to the plan and amend it to match what was requested of them to move forward. Thank you. Ben On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:06 PM Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitnern.iowa-city.org> wrote: All, The applicant for the Hickory Trail Estates rezoning has submitted an updated OPD Plan. This plan will be discussed at next week's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday, March 18th at 7pm. The meeting's agenda packet can be found here: htips://www.icgov.org/cit - government/boards/ lap ening-and-zoning-commission The Zoom link for the meeting can be found here: htips://zoom. us/meeting/register/tJMtceCrgzM-jGtHRYdNFfGxUsOm I baWmr681 Please send me any correspondence you would like forwarded to the Commission. From: Anne Russett To: "Katherine Beydler" Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Comments for P&Z meeting Thursday, 3/18 Date: Tuesday, March 16, 20219:11:03 AM Hi, Katherine — Thank you for your comments. We will share them with the Commission. Anne From: Katherine Beydler <kbeyds@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 20218:26 AM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Comments for P&Z meeting Thursday, 3/18 R3S� Hi Anne, I'm writing with comments regarding the development by Axiom near Hickory Hill Park. I would appreciate it if these concerns could be passed to the Planning and Zoning commission. I was under the impression that the developer was going to comply with the Comprehensive and NE District Plan requirement for single -loaded streets facing parks, as requested by P&Z in the last meeting. I am very disappointed to see that their new plan removes only six homes, leaving lots 36- 28 in particular as double -loaded streets very close to the park. The developer should remedy this by redesigning for single -loading, and also promise never to attempt to add new homes to make that space double -loaded in the future-- perhaps it should also be added to the park. I am also disappointed that to try and retain a maximum profit (rather than maximizing what is best for residents of Iowa City) the addition of other lots has reduced the preservation of wooded area on the development further to only 46%. If the developer is not able to comply with district plans and requirements for the preservation of sensitive areas while making what they see as a large enough profit, maybe they should reconsider this purchase entirely. Lastly, it was not clear how expanding Outlot A very slightly addressed the concerns from the public that that addition of land would not significantly expand the area in the park usable by the public, and rather represents an attempt by the developer to offload land they don't want to manage. Furthermore, the new figure of 11.66 acres was used inconsistently throughout the revised document, making it unclear how committed the developer is to this promise. Many thanks, Katherine Beydler From: Anne Russett To: "David Deardorff' Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: P&Z meeting 3/18 regarding Axiom development near Hickory Hill Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 11:50:03 AM Hi, David — Thank you for your comments. We will forward them to the Commission. Anne From: David Deardorff <davidjdeardorff@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 202110:21 AM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: P&Z meeting 3/18 regarding Axiom development near Hickory Hill R]Sk{ Hello Anne, I'm writing with comments regarding the development by Axiom near Hickory Hill Park. Please pass my comments along to the zoning commission. At the termination of last meeting, the zoning commission made an explicit request for single -loaded streets as a condition which would be an acceptable change to the plan making it something they could potentially pass. The single loaded streets is one of the major requirements of NE District Plan, and something that is vital to maintaining reasonable density and minimizing disruption of important natural areas. However, the developer instead removed only 6 homes, and then left everything else as double loaded streets. It is important that the city hold developers to the stipulation of the NE District plan, because no one else but the city government can do that. I understand the city wants revenue and the developers want profit, but the needs of the developer to turn a profit should not supersede the needs of the city, previous agreements, or the concerns of the constituents. I am also disappointed that to try and retain a maximum profit (rather than maximizing what is best for residents of Iowa City) the addition of other lots has reduced the preservation of wooded areas on the development further to only 46%, which violates another city requirement. If the developer is not able to comply with district plans and requirements for the preservation of sensitive areas while making what they see as a large enough profit, they should reconsider their plans and goals relative to the sites available and perhaps choose a different location. Natural parks are an important component of a city, and cities which can protect them will ultimately draw in desirable residents as cities continue to become more dense and lacking in substantial nature areas. Lastly, it was not clear how expanding Outlot A minimally addressed the concerns from the public that that addition of land would not significantly expand the area in the park usable by the public, and rather represents an attempt by the developer to offload land they don't want to manage. Furthermore, the new figure of 11.66 acres was used inconsistently throughout the revised document, making it unclear how committed the developer is to this promise. Thank you for your time and consideration, David Deardorff From: Mary Winder To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Subject: letter about Hickory Trail Estates rezoning Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 12:10:40 PM RI$F{ Ray or Anne, I would appreciate it very much if you would please forward the following letter to the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank you. Mary W. March 16, 2021 Dear Anne, Ray, and Planning and Zoning Commission Members: I am writing to you about the proposed zoning change for the land near Hickory Hill Park for the Hickory Trail Estates development. On the evening of Feb. 18, 1 attended the entire Zoom meeting of the commissioners that addressed this topic. I was quite impressed with the commissioners' patience and care in discussing this issue and in listening to all of those who had concerns about the issue. At the very end of that long meeting, I was very excited and very pleased when the commissioners voted against recommending the proposed zoning change for this development and invited the developers to revise the plan so that it would follow the recommendations listed in the City's Northeast District Plan for the Bluffwood area and the City's Comprehensive Plan. I understand that these recommendations support using single - loaded streets to provide a buffer between residential development and a park, such as Hickory Hill Park, which is a concept that makes perfect sense. However, when I recently viewed the amended plan for this development, I was utterly dismayed. Yes, the old plan has been somewhat tweaked, but there are no substantial changes from the first plan and there are still many houses planned for both sides of the street closest to the park, with some very short distances (35 to 55 feet) between the residential property and the park boundary along quite a stretch in two directions. I respectively implore you to also vote against this revised version of the development plan and to request that the developers revise this plan again the way you asked them to do in the first place—so that the guidelines are followed, which means that the street closest to the park be changed to a single -loaded street (resulting in no home lots labeled 29 through 41 on the most recent plan). Perhaps the third version of the development plan for Hickory Trail Estates will be the charm. I hope so. If this development is going to take place, it needs to be planned carefully and by following the City's own guidelines. I consider Hickory Hill Park to be a treasure for Iowa City, and I hope you will make certain that any development taking place around the park be done in a way that causes the smallest negative impact on the park as possible. This can be accomplished, I believe, by following the City's wise guidelines. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Mary Winder 785-985-2519 From: Kristen Morrow To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 12:32:39 PM Attachments: imaae001.ong image002.png image003.)ng image004.1ng_ image005.rng I Greetings Mr. Heitner, My comments for the commission regarding the updated proposal are that the developers made very little attempt to account for the encroachment of the houses to the park. The entire development should utilize single loaded streets (at the very least), and as is, the new proposal would not eliminate the harm posed by the housing to the viewshed (not to mention the soundscape) currently found in this section of the park. The developers (many not from this area) have made only negligible updates in response to the overwhelming public outcry to their plans, leaving me with little faith that they have a vested interest in this community or in the concerns of the park users. The commission should not approve the updated proposal, as it does not comply with the recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commision, nor the IC Comprehensive and NE District Plans. Thank you for sharing my comments. Sincerely, Kristen Morrow On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:06 PM Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner&iowa-city.org> wrote: All, The applicant for the Hickory Trail Estates rezoning has submitted an updated OPD Plan. This plan will be discussed at next week's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday, March 18th at 7pm. The meeting's agenda packet can be found here: htWs://www.icgoy.org/city- govemment/boards/planning-and-zoning-commission The Zoom link for the meeting can be found here: httns: //zoom.us/meeting/register/tJMtceCrgzM-jGtHRYdNFfGxUsOm 1 baWmr681 From: Allison Jaynes To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: New Hickory Hill development plan Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 1:53:50 PM RI$F{ Dear Ms. Russett and Mr. Heitner, It appears that the board is poised to approve the development of land adjacent to Hickory Hill without listening to the concern of the many citizens who benefit from this land daily and weekly. I suppose that should not be too surprising, but I had hoped for a different outcome. (You have 69 pages of objections in the current packet alone!) I think of our city as unique when compared to other areas, and one that has the foresight to see into the future and preserve the aspects that are really worth fighting for; but it seems not. I make one final plea to this board. The development of this land will not only ruin the park aesthetically, but it will contribute to the overall decline of the abutting land and watersheds. I noticed that the development company did not provide a conceptual rendering of the rows of houses that will be visible on the ridge across from the West Prairie at the lookout point some call Sunrise Bench. I submit a very amateur rendering at the end of this letter, although it would be ideal to receive this from the developers since I'm not sure on the orientation and size of the houses to be built. Notice how the houses, visible from the lookout point for sure, all have yards that angle into the newly restored prairie on the slope below. A small list of detrimental activities that will occur at these locations: (1) Drainage of lawn chemicals directly into the watershed and prairie landscapes. Chemically -treated lawns are known hazards for native, beneficial insects and small animals - and the runoff is no exception. (2) Absolutely no buffer exists between deer and fox habitat and the newly -developed houses - this will only increase animal -human conflicts. New homeowners will complain about deer browsing their landscape. (No mention was made that these new developments will provide deer -resistant plantings.) Cat owners will stress about the number of foxes in their yards. And the negative impacts on the wildlife of Hickory Hill will continue to compound. (3) Near constant lawn mower sounds in the summer months on the weekend - with no buffer between the adjacent backyards and the valley between the prairie areas where residents go for peace and quiet. (4) Finally, the aesthetic effects of having the valley ringed with houses on the ridge above while trying to enjoy a respite from city life. Please reconsider the approval of this development based on the arguments above. Perhaps there could be an agreement made with Friends of Hickory Hill or Bur Oak to purchase this land, or for the City to purchase with a lease to these groups. At the very least, please consider rejecting the plots labeled 28 through 41, as those yards will have the most direct impact on the park. Sincerely, Allison Jaynes Hotz Ave, Iowa City ORIGINAL PICTURE: ®❑ CONCEPTUAL RENDERING: From: PG To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hil development, P&Z meeting March 18th Date: Tuesday, March 16, 20213:34:25 PM i pp i I am emailing you to voice my opinion on the upcoming development adjacent to hickory hill park. I advocate for no development at all. I hope you will ignore the plan. One of the buildings is too tall for zoning code, they only removed five units from the rejected proposal. At least, approve exceptions that must be met regarding the zoning standards. Letting this go forward will effectively ruin the only preserved piece of nature in Iowa City. Hickory hill wont be the same. When you're walking through nature you're not supposed to see residences, driveways, garages, more people, more cars. You are opening up a doorway for the elimination of our cities most blissful, quiet parks. Do you feel content with this? I for one, would have a hard time sleeping at night. From: Tanner King To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Date: Tuesday, March 16, 20215:27:43 PM RI$H Hello, Mr. Heitner! I hope you are enjoying yourself despite the weather. I'm just sending you this email in regards to the "new" proposed plan for the development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. I hope it doesn't need pointing out that this new plan does nothing to address any of the problems that we sat for 4 hours discussing last time. This is still a plan that cashes in on a taxpayer -funded park to increase property value for a select few people at the expense of the park itself. See you (virtually) Thursday! Tanner King From: david purdy To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Tuesday, March 16, 20215:35:09 PM Attachments: image001.ong image002.pno image003.)nQ image004.1ng_ image005.rng I Thanks for alerting me to the meeting. Did you include my correspondence to the P and Z Commission for the February 18th meeting? I don't see that in this week's packet. It was in an email I sent to you on February 15th and you responded to on February 16th. If it was not, can it be included with this email? If it wasn't sent to the P and Z Commission then please include it with this email. Either way I would like to provide just have a couple of thoughts for this meeting: "After reading the meeting minutes from the February 18th meeting, I want to thank the commission for listening to all the input concerning the development. I agree the P and Z should not keep changing the goal posts for the developer. However, several commission members clearly said they would approve the development if lots 26-44 were removed from the plan. I would agree with this suggestion as it clearly matches the intent of the Northeast District Plan. Yes, the plan is over 20 years old but it was designed with many people involved and many different viewpoints represented. City planning staff creating a blueprint for the NE District Plan did an excellent job of balancing development and buffering the park. It can still weather the test of time. I would also agree that the view on cul-de-sacs has changed and that they should not be required in this development. I would like to thank the developer for having a higher density near Scott Boulevard and for removing a couple of lots to protect the view from the open area in the field. However, as several commissioners have indicated being 100 feet from the closest trail means the houses backed up to the park are still visible. Having lots 28-41 removed from the plan will most closely resemble the intent of the Northeast District Plan and provide a buffer. This change will definitely make a big difference. Yes, a person can see the houses on the other side of the street but there is a much bigger buffer and more closely resembles the area on Bloomington and Cedar Streets. I would urge the commissioners to reiterate to the developer their ideas from the February 18th meeting so that they know what the commission will accept. Having served on city commissions before I know that the process might take several meetings but the end result usually comes out the better. Agreeing to the current development and sending it to the City Council for their review is not what the P and Z Commission is supposed to be doing. Getting a solution that meets the Northeast District Plan and the expectations of most people on P and Z and then sending it to the City Council is a much better process. Thanks! David Purdy 1434 E. Bloomington Street" On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:06 PM Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitnerniowa-city.org> wrote: All, The applicant for the Hickory Trail Estates rezoning has submitted an updated OPD Plan. This plan will be discussed at next week's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday, March 18th at 7pm. The meeting's agenda packet can be found here: haps://www.icgoy.org cites government/boards/planning-and-zoning-commission The Zoom link for the meeting can be found here: https://zoom. us/meeting/register/tJMtceCrq,zM-jGtHRYdNFfGxUsOm I baWmr681 Please send me any correspondence you would like forwarded to the Commission. Thank you, Ray Heitner Associate Planner (he/him/his) 319.356.5238 From: david ourdy To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Trail Estates Date: Monday, February 15, 20216:55:34 PM Attachments: We sent you safe versions of your files.msg Hickory Trail Estates proposal letter.pdf Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Greetings - I have attached a letter regarding the Hickory Trail Estates development to be discussed with the Planning and Zoning Commission this Thursday. Could you please make sure the P and Z Commission members receive the letter? If it is too late to include in their packet, I would be happy to send it to them directly. Thanks! David Purdy February 15, 2021 Greetings - I would like to comment on the proposed development Hickory Trails Estates. I was actively involved with the Northeast District Plan Development and can provide some insight to the discussion between city planning staff and participants in the workshops. There was approximately 50-60 very involved participants. Many were there because of their concern about development surrounding Hickory Hill Park. This was an exhaustive planning process involving many compromises by all participants. Reviewing the Northeast District Plan I would like to emphasize several key points: • Incorporating and maintaining a green open space buffer between Hickory Hill Park and urban development to preserve the natural integrity of the park (page 8) • Encouraging the use of single -loaded streets (development on only one side of a street) when necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas and create public vistas (page 9) • The future land use scenario for the Bluffwood Neighborhood reflects the planning principles developed at the citizen workshops (page 13) • Encouraging the use of single -loaded streets (development on only one side of a street) when necessary to protect environmentally sensitive areas and create public vistas (page 9) • A conservation residential design is proposed on the property between First Avenue and Hickory Hill Park to provide a buffer between the residential development and the park (page 15) • In the Bluffwood Neighborhood, the plan calls for buffering green space to be provided between Hickory Hill Park and residential development on the south and west portions of the Larson tract. One goal of this buffer is to minimize the visibility of residential development from the park. This can be accomplished by shifting density on the Larson property away from the park and aligning it in slightly higher densities (townhouses and small apartment houses) along the adjacent arterial streets. (page 17) • No direct vehicular access to the park or through streets adjacent to the park are proposed. Instead, the residential development nearest the park is shown on cul-de-sac streets and pedestrian access to Hickory Hill Park is encouraged (page 17) I believe the staff report for Hickory Trail Estates minimizes the citizen participation and compromises developed during the planning process and outlined in the report. 1) "Staff recognizes that the proposed development does not perfectly match with the conceptual vision presented in the Northeast District Plan, particularly related to the single - loaded streets (i.e. streets with housing only one side). The plan shows housing on both side of the street near N.Scott Blvd and the remainder of the area with housing only on one side. The preliminary OPD plan also shows housing on both sides of the street near N. Scott Blvd and a single -loaded street east of the stream corridor. The proposed lots that do not perfectly match with the vision are the 15 lots between the two proposed trail connections on the east and south side of the Hickory Trail extension. The plan also encourages a buffer between any new development and the Park. The applicant has attempted to incorporate a buffer by showing a separation between the existing park boundary and the new lots. This buffer ranges between 202' and 35'. At the narrowest sections, the applicant has incorporated landscaping that includes deciduous trees. 2) Staff indicates that no definition of a buffer is outlined in the Northeast District Plan. "The closest distance between the proposed home and the existing park boundary is approximately 35'. Each lot would have a 20' rear yard setback, which would put a minimum buffer distance of 55' between any house structure and the existing park boundary." 3) Staff acknowledges that the homes along the west side of Hickory Trail will likely be viewable from the eastern portions of the Park. The City Forrester has discussed putting in additional landscaping with a mixture of evergreen and shade trees along the rear yards of the western properties to provide additional screening from the west. 4) The preliminary OPD shows housing on both sides of Hickory Trail, which departs from the Bluffwood Neighborhood Map. The applicant is proposing at least 35' of separation distance between the rear yards of the western properties along Hickory Trail, and the existing eastern park boundary. 5) Additionally, pending completion of a woodland mitigation plan, the applicant intends to grant the entire 10.86 acres of Outlot A to the City as neighborhood open space. This will technically remove the buffer distance on paper, but in practice, will keep a woodland buffer in this area. 6) The Northeast District Plan does call for buffering between Hickory Hill Park and the subject property, in an attempt to minimize the visibility of residential development from the Park. The Plan directs to accomplish this by shifting density away from the Park to the north, where small apartments and townhouses can take advantage of slightly higher prescribed densities. Buffer distance dimensions are not provided in the Plan. The applicant is showing a range of buffer distances between the rear yards of the OPD Plan and the existing eastern Park boundary. Still, it is the applicant's intent to grant the "buffer area" of Outlot A to the City for future use as an enlarged Hickory Hill Park. Reviewing the NE District Plan and the proposed development, I would agree the proposed development does not perfectly match the NE District Plan. I would say some parts of it are not close. It is true that there was not written in the plan a specific buffer amount. However, from reviewing the items mentioned earlier in my letter it is obvious that the goal of the plan was create public vistas, protect the natural integrity of the park, and minimize the visibility of residential development from the park. Reviewing the materials presented to the City Council at their 3/30/1999 meeting where they approved the plan can give us some insight it what was discussed at the workshops. In a memo from Senior Planner Bob Miklo written on December 29, 1998 to the Planning and Zoning Commission it mentions buffers of up to 200 feet (page 2) and 'dwellings would face the park rather than have private backyards abutting the park." (also on page 2). Further, in the 1/13/99 Parks and Recreation Commission minutes Mr. Miklo says 'the plan calls for up to a 150 to 600 foot buffer between the park and where development would occur." Granting 10.86 acres to the park does create a buffer for a small section of the park but the buffer is in an area where most people cannot walk. In addition, a good part of the buffer would actually benefit the Hickory Height Development -where if a person did go in the wooded ravine and turned around- the first thing they would see would be the houses in Hickory Heights. Creating a 141 unit senior housing building along the stretch of the park probably most viewed by casual walkers in the park is not protecting the integrity of the park nor minimalizing the visibility from the park. I am not opposed to development in this area. As mentioned at the start of the letter I worked diligently to compromise on the NE District Plan. However, I do not believe the proposed development is what was envisioned by the Northeast District Plan, its planning participants, or the City Council that passed the plan. I would encourage the developer to create another concept plan that allows for development of the parcel but more closely follows the NE District Plan. This would include larger buffers between houses and the park, development on just one side of the street, 2 cul-de-sacs, more density towards Scott Boulevard, etc. I would be happy to assist. Sincerely, David Purdy From: Glenda Buenaer To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Tuesday, March 16, 20215:50:24 PM Attachments: imaoe001.Dng image002.pno image003.rnQ image004.1ng_ image005.rng I Dear Mr. Heitner, Would you please send my letter concerning the rezoning request for Hickory Trail Estates to the Commissioners? Thank you. Sincerely, Glenda Buenger RE: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning The Hickory Trail Estates proposal complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan in several respects. It does not offer the affordable housing the City so desperately needs, but it adds to the City's housing diversity by offering elder housing which the City does seem to need. It offers connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. However, it does not comply with the Northeast District Plan of the City's Comprehensive Plan in regards to protection for Hickory Hill Park. As discussed on pp. 7-8 of the updated Staff Report, the Northeast District Plan clearly aimed at protecting Hickory Hill Park by keeping development away from park perimeters. In an attempt to give credit, during the 2-18-21 PZ meeting Michael Welch of Axiom Consultants described how Axiom Consultants, in response to public concern, had sought to increase buffer between the project and Hickory Hill Park. At the same time, isn't it a little misleading to focus on the distance between houses and existing park trails rather than houses and the park itself? Hickory Hill Park is more than trails. Similarly, the updated Staff Report seems to make much of the 11.66 acres of Outlot A to be donated to the City as mitigation for other project impacts. Outlot A may in fact be desirable, but as the updated Staff Report acknowledges on p. 8, it no longer counts as buffer if it is to become part of the park. The re -submitted proposal still shows a double -loaded street and buffer zones of only 35 feet along parts of the west and south project borders that abut Hickory Hill Park. This is unacceptable. I reviewed the commissioners' discussion prior to the 0-7 vote on 2-18-21. A couple of the Commissioners expressed a desire to provide direction to the developer to create a more acceptable proposal. As I see it, Commissioners clearly told the developer what could be done to make the application more acceptable, but it appears the developer chose to not heed their advice. Hensch stated it was reasonable to ask that the landscape buffer be extended or to just go to a front -loaded street in the area adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. He stated a front -loaded street design is a legitimate issue from the Northeast District Plan. Craig clearly stated adherence to the Northeast District Plan. "Build houses facing the park not backing up to the park with a street in between," she said. If the developer removed Lots 26- 44, she stated, the large single-family houses would be on the far side of a street, creating a buffer she could live with. Elliot stated that even if park users could still see the houses, a single -loaded street would make a big psychological difference. Nolte plainly stated adherence to the Northeast District Plan and that if the proposal just had the single -loaded street, he could support it. A single -loaded street with houses on the far side of the street, away from Hickory Hill Park, would permit development while adhering to the Northeast District Plan's intent to protect the park. The current design makes the park vulnerable to possible runoff from chemical lawn treatments. It puts houses too close to the park. People have parties and cars and dogs and kids and operate noisy gasoline -powered yard tools such as mowers and leaf and snow blowers, and they cook animal flesh on outdoor grills. A design that allows back yards to abut the park allows all these to invade the park, degrading the public's enjoyment of the park. In contrast, a single -loaded street with houses on the far side of the street would abate park users' perception of human habitation next to the park. As Craig pointed out, a single -loaded street with houses placed on the far side of the street would impose a physical and psychological boundary between HHP and human development. Additionally, a buffer zone between the street and HHP would screen the street from HHP, helping to protect the view shed. This project needs to replace trees, and many of those trees could do double duty as both street trees and buffer trees in a zone between the street and park boundaries. Once it was more mature, this buffer zone would also help mitigate noise. It could be designed to provide some wildlife habitat, especially for birds and insects. Thank you, Commissioners, for your public service and all of the time-consuming work you do. I appreciate your patience and receptivity to my concerns for HHP. I hope you will consider that citizens participate to create a plan in the expectation that city officials adhere to the plan. I trust you recognize you are making a momentous decision for decades and generations of Hickory Hill Park users and visitors. This rezoning request places you as stewards of our beloved park. Please be good stewards and protect our park by insisting on a single -loaded street. This would allow development while minimizing harmful effects to the park and degrading users' experience of the park. It would allow private gain while protecting the public good. It would stick to the Plan. Could we please stick to the Plan? Sincerely, Glenda Buenger 318 S. Lucas St. Iowa City From: Leiana Arcenas To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Opposed to the revised rezoning plan for the area by Hickory Hill Park Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20216:54:06 AM Hi Raymond, The revised proposal to rezone the area by Hickory Hill Park is insufficient because it still does not comply with the Northeast District plan. Among several points of non-compliance, the buffer between the park and the residential area ranges from being too narrow to non-existent. This proposal should be denied, as well as any future versions that do not FULLY comply with the Northeast District plan. Thank you, Leiana Arcenas This email is from an external source. From: Parker, Adam G To: Raymond Heitner Subject: REZ20-0016—Hickory Trail Rezoning Resubmission Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20219:00:11 AM I FigS� Hello Ray, Thanks for passing along meeting information. Once again I am opposed to the recommendation to rezone REZ20-0016—Hickory Trail. Based off the feedback and discussion of the previous rezoning meeting held February 18th, I do not believe the developer made adequate concessions to adhere to the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan and NE District Plan as single -loaded street adjacent the park were proposed. The Iowa City Comprehensive plan discourages parks that are surrounded by private property. The plat as currently presented does not adhere to this principle. Double -loaded streets as currently presented, would allow few property owners to benefit from the rest of Iowa City residents by allowing their private property to abut a wooded public park. These homeowners then have financial arbitrage of having property directly on public land which can never be developed. Leaving residents to feel as if they are trespassing while walking on public trails in what feels like their "back yard. A single -loaded street would create the appropriate separation between the park and private property creating greater access to the park and not allowing private citizens to benefit from a public good. T NE District Plan Concept Drawing 1st Ave Hickory Hill Park JL The NE District Plan drafters were even so diligent to create a drawing of how the land could be appropriately developed buffering the park with single -loaded streets and offering adequate buffering from a public good and private property. The drawing also shifts higher density buildings closer to First Ave and Scott BLVD. allowing more socioeconomic statuses the opportunity to benefit from the proximity of the park. The current proposal does not adequately accomplish this goal. By passing the plat as currently designed the city would be once again rewarding the wealthy and well- connected over the diverse diaspora Iowa City needs to cater additional housing opportunities to. A year of political and social upheaval revealing the vast inequities communities face, we have seen these communities need opportunities to be closer to expansive green space higher densities closer to 1st and Scott BLVD would accomplish this goal is the drawing above demonstrates. This rushed development is especially troublesome in a year where Hickory Hill Park has been a refuge for those seeking safer solace outside their own four walls. The pandemic has created an economic crisis for many including current property owners and low-interest rate incentive for the developers. As we are approaching the tail end of a chaotic year, I would hate for the city to concede a short-term wind fall to the detriment of long term vibrancy of the community and its most expansive, wild park. We are currently shaping what the Iowa City community will look like 50,100, 250 years from now. We have seen access to public green space not only increases property values but continues to attract community members to new areas. I encourage the planning and zoning commission to take a long term approach in their thought process. Reject this proposal as currently presented and demand the developers follow the vision of the Iowa City Comprehensive plan and NE district plan. As it is the groundwork for long-term development. Thanks for all you do, I appreciate your participation in moving the community forward! Adam Parker 1302 E. Bloomington St. Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. From: The Rutherfords To: Raymond Heitner Subject: please continue to protect Hickory Hill Park Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20219:52:51 AM RI$H Dear Planning and Zoning Commission. I was so grateful for your 0-7 vote against the Hickory Trail Estates rezoning proposal. I've seen the most current submission and do not feel they've done enough to address the concerns raised in the first meeting. More needs to be done to protect this absolute treasure of a park. I live where I do on the east side of IC because of the proximity to the park. Thank you! John Rutherford 1717 E. College St Iowa City, IA From: Lutgendorf, Philip A To: Raymond Heitner Cc: Lutgendorf, Susan K; cikohrt(@gmail.com Subject: Planning and Zoning Commission and Hickory Hill Park Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 10:24:52 AM Dear Mr. Heitner, I commend the Commissioners for their vote against approving the developer's rezoning request for 48.75 acres adjacent to Hickory Hill Park at last month's meeting. However, the slightly revised request now before the Commission continues to ignore both the spirit and letter of the Comprehensive or Northeast District Plan with regard to the Park, that was developed with much input from the community. My wife and I will try to attend the virtual meeting tomorrow night, though we will be traveling. However, in case we are unable to "show up" (virtually), we would like to be on record as urging the Commissioners to continue to reject the developer's plan, until it is further scaled down to incorporate only single - loaded streets and the stipulated 175-200 feet buffer between house sites and the parkland that so many of us cherish. Thanking you for your attention, Philip and Susan Lutgendorf 2 Glendale Court Iowa City, IA 52245 From: wobtj(cbmchsi.com To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 10:36:10 AM Attachments: imaae001.pna imaae002.pnno imaae003.i)na imaae004.pnno imaae005.i)na I Good Morning, Ray, My Wife Gaylen and I appose the second proposal by the developer for the area near Hickory Hill Park in Iowa City for there was little change to his proposal and it does not provide a sufficient "Buffer" between this proposed development plan and our Iowa City Hickory Hill Park. We would at a minimum support a plan which discourages Parks surrounded by private property and allow only single loaded street access!!! Sincerely yours, Tony and Gaylen Wobeter 2605 Bluffwood Circle Iowa City From: Raymond Heitner Sent: Friday, March 12, 20214:05 PM To: 'adam-parker@uiowa.edu' ; 'adam-j-weis@uiowa.edu' ; 'allisonjaynes@gmail.com' ; 'andrew- russo@uiowa.edu' ; 'ann-synan@uiowa.edu' ; 'asha.l.bhandary@gmail.com' ; 'b3n.berger@gmail.com' ; 'bamcquillen@gmail.com' ; 'brian.lehmann@icloud.com' ; 'hickoryhiker@gmail.com' ; 'clbuckingham@gmail.com' ; 'cjkohrt@gmail.com' ; 'darcyl28@aol.com' ; 'dpurdy2@gmail.com' ; 'liztracey@gmail.com' ; 'emilyakim05@gmail.com' ; 'emily.schacht@gmail.com' ; 'eric.gidal5@gmail.com' ; 'durian.erin@gmail.com' ; 'florence-boos@uiowa.edu' ; 'buengerg@gmail.com' ; 'hannah- molitor@uiowa.edu' ; 'Hannah. Rapson@Raymondlames.com' ; 'heather. w.mcknight@gmail. com' ; 'hbschofield@gmail.com' ; 'perkins.i.t@gmail.com' ; 'jackiehockett@gmail.com' ; 'jameshirsch@gmail.com' ; 'j.k.bradbury@gmail.com' ; 'jasnap23@yahoo.com' ; 'jessemacfarlane@gmail.com' ; 'kjrutherford0l@gmail.com' ; 'moffitt.julie@gmail.com' ; 'karen.nichols@protonmail.com' ; 'tomkatymclaughlin@gmail.com' ; 'kelly-messingham@uiowa.edu' ; 'kelly.teeselink@gmail.com' ; 'kelseyturnis@gmail.com' ; 'Khris.Vickroy@mercer.com' ; 'krisanne-ryther@hawkeyefootball.com' ; 'krinelil@hotmail.com' ; 'knmorrow@gmail.com' ; 'laurajclaps@gmail.com' ; 'lauridi@hotmail.com' ; 'iheartsteakl21@gmail.com' ; 'libbysue.c@gmail.com' ; 'lilysmithjensen@gmail.com' ; 'loalbrecht@gmail.com' ; 'mms246@gmail.com' ; 'mgedlinske@gmail.com' ; 'markrenshaw@me.com' ; 'embenbear@gmail.com' ; 'hortgal@hotmail.com' ; 'mwinder73@yahoo.com' ; 'matthew.def@gmail.com' ; 'modemo403@gmail.com' ; 'maureen.russo.pt@gmail.com' ; 'nfootner@gmail.com' ; 'pholden@iastate.edu' ; 'phillip-lutgendorf@uiowa.edu' ; 'riley.gardam@gmail.com' ; 'robin.kopelman@gmail.com' ; 'roslynn-ellis-1@uiowa.edu' ; 'rukieb@gmail.com' ; 'rwestfa@yahoo.com' ; From: Shellie Miller To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory hill Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 11:45:14 AM Dear Mr Heitner, Please do not rezone. Hickory Hill park is an important stop for migrating warblers and other amazing birds. We'd love to take you birding this spring before the leaves pop out to show you all the wonders. Shellie Miller Kettelkamp East Side, Washington st Sent from my iPhone This email is from an external source. From: Carol Tvx To: Raymond Heitner Subject: development proposal Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 11:51:51 AM RI$H Hello Mr. Heitner, I would like to voice my opposition to the proposed development near Hickory Hill. The plan does not provide enough of a buffer between the park and the proposed development. In order to preserve the wild aspect of Hickory Hill, which is so precious to many of us, any development should adhere to the buffer guidelines set up in previous plans for this area. Sincerely, Carol Tyx 1128 4th Ave Iowa City, Ia 52240 From: Ruth Westfall To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill and the rezoning question Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 1:32:57 PM Dear Mr. Heitner, Hickory Hill is near and dear to my heart, as it is to so many in Iowa City. The Planning and Zoning Commissioners need to follow the Northeast District Plan and to deny the rezoning request of the developer. Here's why: • Considerable public input went into the Northeast District Plan. It represents a consensus. • The Northeast District Plan clearly seeks to protect HHP by transferring development away from the park toward 1 st Avenue. • The proposed project ignores and does not comply with the guiding principle of the Northeast District Plan is the use of single -loaded streets to preserve areas such as Hickory Hill Park, to create public vistas, and to provide public access to natural areas. • The Northeast District Plan's principles are so fundamental they were also included in the Comprehensive Plan, pp. 46-47. Perhaps the most important point here is that the Plan seeks to: -Discourage parks that are surrounded by private property; encourage development of parks with single -loaded street access. Please deny the rezoning request because it does not adhere to the Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast District Plan. The citizens of Iowa City expect the Commission to follow the plans that were approved and to do what they said they would do in 1999. Reject this rezoning request. Sincerely, Ruth Westfall 418 5th Ave Iowa City From: Karin McKeone To: Raymond Heitner Subject: HHP Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 1:52:16 PM Dear Mr. Heitner, I could write endless stories and state so many reasons why it is important to protect Hickory Hill Park. Development continues to squeeze and encroach upon one of the city's great assets. Especially during this time of COVID, nature's offerings have been a source of comfort to many. Hopefully, you have heard many people provide personal accounts of the importance of protecting Hickory Hill Park. I have spent endless hours of volunteer work in Hickory Hill Park to enhance, maintain and protect this natural setting. Tree mulching, fencing and watering were my speciality. In years of draught, I know that I personally saved a number of then wilted oak trees from their demise. Having spent those many hours there, in addition to taking school groups to the park for work sessions and to learn the beauty of the park's offerings, I now plead with the city (again!). Please, please be mindful of the original district plan and why it was developed. Also keep in mind that many citizens were encouraged to give their input to that plan. There are reasons that District Plan provided some restrictions to the encroachment of development around this natural area. One reason is about the senses; what we see, hear, smell, and sometimes taste and touch in the park is restorative; this is a place away from everyday hustle. This natural space is a gem, beloved by many. For those of us who have tried to protect the park in the past, we learned that the city spends years in anticipation of projects, getting public input, and putting those plans into writing. While we lost in our past efforts to protect HHP, many citizens found some satisfaction in knowing we had contributed to the DISTRICT PLAN that would effect future development. This plan was designed to help protect future encroachment. And now, here we are with a possible rezoning which negates all the past efforts in making that plan in the first place. Please place citizen interests at a high priority when you consider double loading streets in the area. Citizens worked in collaboration with the City to assure the HHP area would be enjoyed by many. Please honor that work and limit the huge impact that will occur with the building of large, multi -story homes along nearby park borders. Please consider that as natural areas shrink with the pressures of development, Hickory Hill Park is worth protecting for future generations to enjoy. Please do not allow requests that impact the solice offered by our beautiful Hickory Hill Park. Sincerely, Karin McKeone 4703 Inverness Ct, Iowa City, IA 52245 From: pat bowen To: Raymond Heitner Cc: *City Council; Anne Russett Subject: CaseNo.REZ20-0016 Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20212:07:59 PM To the Planning and Zoning Commission: We are writing today to share our opposition to the rezoning near Hickory Hills Park. The development does not appear to adhere to the Comprehensive Northeast District plan in which the public participated in good faith. We would like to believe that public officials would adhere to those plans. Considerable public input went into the Northeast District Plan. The proposed project appears to ignore the principal of single loaded streets to preserve the area as a beautiful public access that provides access to the natural areas. By ignoring the City's agreement with the community to provide a meaningful buffer for Hickory Hill Park, this rezoning proposal does not even come close to the vision that was agreed to and adopted in the Northeast District Plan. The Northeast District Plan's principles are so fundamental they were also included in the Comprehensive Plan, pp. 46-47. Final question for the P&Z Commission and all decision makers, are you working for the developers or are you working for the citizens of Iowa City? Pandering to the public by allow public meetings for discussion of future projects then ignoring them is not what citizens want or deserve. The rezoning request should be denied. with the Northeast District Plan that the citizens of Iowa City negotiated Sincerely, Pat Bowen Kenn Bowen 1210 Village Rd IC 52240 We are demanding the Commissioners stick in good faith. From: Bruce Tarwater To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20212:42:49 PM a Mr. Heitner- I live in Iowa City next to Hickory Hill Park. The rezoning request should be denied. The developer and PZ Commissioners and staff should consider a plan that adheres to the Comprehensive Plan including the Northeast District Plan. I will be at the meeting as will many of my friends who use and revere our park. Please tell the commissioners that I am one more citizen requesting the request be denied. Below is another letter which I support and have copied and pasted because the gentleman speaks more eloquently than I. But these things I also believe. Do the right thing. Do not turn your back on the will of the people. Herein are my reasons for wishing this zoning request be denied: I am not opposed to development per se. I am opposed to this rezoning because it does not adhere to the Comprehensive or Northeast District plan in which the public participated in good faith that public officials would adhere to these plans. Considerable public input went into the Northeast District Plan. The proposal to construct 1st Avenue east of Hickory Hill Park was very controversial and the planning process was used as a way to reach community consensus, allowing 1st Avenue to be built while also respecting the park. The Northeast District Plan clearly seeks to protect HHP by transferring development away from the park toward 1st Avenue. A guiding principle of the Northeast District Plan is the use of single -loaded streets to preserve areas such as Hickory Hill Park, to create public vistas, and to provide public access to natural areas. The proposed project ignores this guiding principle. The proposed project still includes a double -loaded street (houses on both sides of the street) with inadequate buffer zones between development and the park. The buffer shown in the Comprehensive Plan is at least 175 to 200 feet wide (based on using existing lot lines for scale). The proposed plan offers only 35 feet of buffer between the backyards of houses and the park in a couple of spots along the west and south boundaries of the development area. Additionally, once Outlot A is ceded to the City and becomes part of HHP, there is no buffer between the park and the 10 -unit condo proposed for the NW corner of the development area. One goal of the buffer is to minimize the visibility of residential development from the park. The few trees that the developer offers to plant instead of a wide buffer will not achieve this goal. Concerning the developer's conveyance of Outlot A to the City, Outlet A is undevelopable due to steep wooded slopes, wetlands, streams, and the Sensitive Areas Ordinance. It is therefore no concession on the part of the developer. Outlot 8 is likewise essentially undevelopable. Additionally, it is not clear that the open space that is being dedicated for required Neighborhood Open Space meets the criteria for being usable as required by the zoning code. The staff recommendation for a through street ignores the Northeast District Plan's vision of keeping an open connection between Hickory Hill Park and the wooded ravine in the proposed Outlot B. The street connection in itself may not be objectionable, but there appears to be little effort to preserve the amount of open space shown in the Northeast District Plan. The developer is seeking waivers of zoning requirements to allow a large senior-living complex in an otherwise single -family zone. The developer is seeking zoning incentives from the City but is not adhering to the Comprehensive Plan's vision in exchange. By ignoring the City's agreement with the community to provide a meaningful buffer for Hickory Hill Park, this rezoning proposal does not even come close to the vision that was agreed to and adopted in the Northeast District Plan. The Northeast District Plan's principles are so fundamental they were also included in the Comprehensive Plan, pp. 46-47. Perhaps the most important point here is that the Plan seeks to: -Discourage parks that are surrounded by private property; encourage development of parks with single-loaded street access. The rezoning request should be denied. The developer and PZ Commissioners and staff should consider a plan that adheres to the Comprehensive Plan including the Northeast District Plan. To this end, I am advocating a single-loaded street design for the proposal. This means houses on only one side of the proposed Hickory Trail, on the side away from the park, with adequate buffer between the street and HHP boundaries. Commissioners need to stick with the Northeast District Plan that the citizens of Iowa City negotiated in good faith. Sincerely, Bruce Tarwater 2669 Hickory Trail Iowa City, IA 52245 hickoryhiker(cbgmail.com From: TaellS To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Subject: Hickory Hill proposal Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20212:55:10 PM RI$F{ Dear Mr. Heitner, I am very concerned about the traffic in and out of the development, not because of the homeowners, but because of the large number of employees at the proposed assisted living/memory care business. A building that size with that capacity will require a HUGE number of employees working around the clock shifts. This will add considerably to the traffic in the area, especially during the usual busy times of the day and when kids are walking to school. In addition, this traffic will depart not only via First Avenue but also on to Scott Boulevard via the development where I would expect a lot of children will live and play. I am certain the traffic study did not take into account the volume of traffic from this business. Also the new design still goes solidly against the NE District and Comprehensive Plans!! I am also very concerned that this meeting was scheduled with less than a weeks notice and during the communities spring break. It smells a little fishy! Please share these comments with the P&Z Commission. Thomas and Melanie Gellhaus 906 Tamarack Trail Iowa City, IA From: Casey James Kohrt To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner; fhhD-board Ca aooalearouos.com Subject: Friends of Hickory Hill comments on proposed development Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20213:14:41 PM a Anne and Ray, please pass these comments on to the commission Commissioners, There is no reason for the City to settle for less than what the Comprehensive Plan calls for on the proposed Hickory Hill Estates. The Comprehensive Plan clearly lays out a vision for what a property owner/developer can expect to achieve when the property is rezoned. At the time the Northeast District Plan was adopted, the Larson estate owned the property. Both the current owner, ACT, and the developer were aware of the officially adopted plan when they purchased the property, or offered to purchase the property. The price that they paid, or will pay for the property, should be based on what the City has told the public and potential developers what can be expected in terms of development. The developer could recoup costs of adhering to the plan by increasing density at the north end of the project. This would also adhere to City objectives of increased housing diversity and affordable housing. The Northeast District Plan was developed in public: the City— including the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council—invited us, the public, as well as property owners and real estate developers to participate in the planning process. The Plan was thoroughly discussed and well vetted when it was adopted in 1999. Again, as part of that process the City made a commitment to preserve a significant buffer for Hickory Hill Park to get community buy in for the construction of First Avenue. After the plan was adopted there was a referendum on whether the City should build First Avenue. Proponents for constructing the street used the Northeast District Plan to assure voters that Hickory Hill Park would be protected if the First Avenue was built. The public voted to build the street. What has changed since the adoption of the Northeast District Plan in 1999? The contentious debate regarding the construction of First Avenue has been settled. The City at great public expense built the street along with Scott Boulevard providing street access to the Larson property which is now proposed to be developed as Hickory Hill Estates. Prior to this public investment, the Larson property was only suitable for agricultural uses. It was us, the public of Iowa City, that invested public funds in the infrastructure to make the Larson property developable today. But that public investment was based on the plan to protect Hickory Hill Park with a significant buffer on the east side of the park. Why should ACT and the developer reap the benefits of our public investment if they are not going to adhere to the Plan? Friends of Hickory Hill Park founders had significant input into the NE District Plan. It was intended to protect the NE part of the park. Since 2004, FHHP has spent 14,882 hours, or 7.15 years of time service in the park restoring habitat, building trails and improving the park. This is a $320,000 value, in addition to thousands of dollars we cost -shared with the City on other management projects. In total, we have engaged almost 5000 persons in over 1000 events. We have also raised funds to purchase the Pappy Dickens Property, protecting the Northwest corner of the park, now held by Bur Oak Land Trust. We never pursued the purchase of the NE tract because we thought it would be developed in accordance with the NE district plan and the Comprehensive Plan. We now ask the City to step up and not approve plats that do not conform to the City's own plans. Casey Kohrt, Chair, Friends of Hickory Hill Park From: Anne Russett To: "hannah raoson" Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Hickory Hill development Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20213:26:26 PM Attachments: imaae001.Dna image002.pnng imaae003.Dna image004.pnng imaae005.Dna Hi, Hannah — Thanks for your comments. We will forward them onto the Commission. If you'd like to discuss any of these questions with Ray or I, please feel free to give us a call. Thanks, Anne CITY OF IOWA CITY iJN6CO CITY OF LITERATURE WWW.ICGOV.ORG 0000 Anne Russett, AICP Senior Planner She/Her/Hers p:319-356-5251 1410 E Washington St Iowa City, IA 52240 From: hannah rapson <hannah.letisha@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 20212:56 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Hickory Hill development R]S3{ Anne, Thank you for taking the time to read my entire email, as the 273 page -packet took many hours to digest and consider. Below are my concerns as I can best convey them, based on the plan, which I had limited time to review and respond to. I sincerely hope we can work together as a community to build a thoughtful development that adheres to the city's comprehensive plan. Simply put, the plan should make sense given the location and the environmental impacts of this development, which neighbors such a unique asset to our city, Hickory Hill Park. I start by sharing my concern in the presentation of materials at the last meeting. • Presentation of Application o No slide images presented during presentation — do not allow for a point of reference while on Zoom o Rotated maps — cause confusion for viewers ■ / am working on putting together an overlay of proposal v. comp plan in aligned orientation to help viewers better understand o View of senior living and residences — no elevations presented "as seen from park" perspective o Staff — lack or awareness of wetlands on property shows dismissal of sensitive lands, which is very concerning o Wetland/Environment Survey — lack of research on watershed impact does not consider developments overall impact on other neighborhoods along the Ralston creek, ie. other city residents o The comment made by a commissioner "Why does the community care only when in their backyard?" Because we are experts on where we live. We rely on the city to put together thoughtful consideration and to listen to the people who actually live in these spaces and consider their experiences and valuable point of view. In case I have missed something in my three points, I have included a list of questions that I believe are unanswered at this point and should be considered as part of figuring out how to carefully develop this land, taking into account the potential impact of this development on many community residents near and far to the park. • Stick to the Comprehensive Plan o Obligated by law to do so, unless a good reason not to ■ Thru Street Concession —there is a good reason (while opposed I remain opposed) to consider continuation of the street, given the proposed senior living facility. Another solution would be to preserve a cul-de-sac for residential and orient the Senior Living Facility toward 1st Ave, where service needs and additional vehicle traffic would not flow along the park. ■ Increased Population Density Concession — the senior living facility increasing the allotted density. This is already a concession and there is no reason not to uphold the comprehensive plan for single loaded streets along the park. ■ Single -loaded streets • There is no good argument for eliminating single -loaded streets • Lots 28-41 are too close to the park and should not be approved per the comprehensive plan • Due to the nature of this development being built on a sensitive area, the environmental impact of a thru-street should be considered. • Raised crosswalks do not slow traffic and they are bad for plowing. What other measures can be taken to slow traffic if a thru- street is approved? • Senior Living Facility ■ Per the city assessor's site, the house currently at the end of Hickory Trail adjacent to the meadow, which many complained about during last month's meeting is roughly 6800 sq ft and two stories high. The proposed senior center is 10 times that size at 69,000 sq ft and will be built on a similar fall - away slope where the 4 -story side of the building faces the park, in effect appearing twice as high as the current residence bordering the park. The 35' variance request should not be granted. This building is too big. ■ Non -permeable surfaces. The added roadway and parking lots in addition to the massive roof line of this building create a significant amount of non - permeable surfaces at the top of the hill. The Ralston Creek went under major erosion restoration just this past year (I will bring images to the meeting). The Commission should consider the potential impact of watershed from this portion of the development in considering approval of the size and scope, including parking lots. Considerations of permeable pavers or underground parking lots should be explored as part of reducing watershed to the creek and neighbors down -stream. ■ Assisted Living and Memory Care usage means that these residents will not use or access the park, therefore an orientation otherwise, that does not negatively impact traffic around the park should be considered. The current senior living facility does not benefit from this location and the services and high traffic will negatively impact park patrons. This should be noted when considering the orientation of this facility to the park and the traffic flow. ■ Is this the best location for this type of senior facility — it is furthest from the hospital system. • Woodland Buffer to park o Tree -lined with streets are not enough o Woodland hillside should be planted at developers' expense to protect viewsheds based on concession or through street and housing visibility. o Trails should be included in the development plan and mandated via a Conditional Zoning Agreement, so that it is sure to happen. Intention is not enough. Note that the trail agreement made with Hickory Trail development was never implemented. This should be mandated via a conditional agreement. o 10.86 -acre buffer between developments does more to protect the developments from each other than it does to protect viewshed from the park. A similar green screen should be included in the developer plan and at developer cost due, given the thru-street, which not only improves city service access, but also allows for more houses to be built than the comp plan lays out and impacts park viewsheds. This buffer is required through Open Land mandates — how does this impact the park's ability to use this space? o Noise pollution should be considered as part of protecting this natural park. It will impact the experience of park patrons, as well as wildlife. Questions • Why is the retirement facility not counted in the density limit? • What is the city getting for the height variance? • Has the city considered a watershed study given the number of sensitive slopes? • What will the impact be on Ralston Creek, which has had significant erosion issues, recently repaired? • How will the wetlands on the property be impacted by a significant increase in concrete runoff? 0 How will the watershed increase without trees to soak up run off? • Why would the city leave the northside/woodbluff plan (aka, proposed development site) in place in 2013, if they revisited the entire master plan? • What other natural areas are there in Iowa City that are comparable to Hickory Hill? • Is Hickory Hill an asset to our community? If so, why wouldn't we want to protect it as part of considering a thoughtful development plan? • Could the city or a private donor still buy the land instead of the developer? • Why didn't the city parks system identify this as a concern sooner and recommend a buy out plan that would protect the park? • Why can't cul-de-sacs be considered in this area, even if not elsewhere — there is no other area in town like this area, which should be considered a "special feature" per comp plan language? • Can a true environmental study be done to understand the impact of this development? • This is not a Natural Area — the comment is unnecessary and meant to degrade the quality of the land. These areas would not be called woodlands and sensitive areas, if they did not have value as natural land. Beyond that, the argument is not necessarily even about not developing the land, as much as it is about preserving the park adjacent to the land with regard to tree covering, watershed and viewsheds. The argument that this is not natural land is irrelevant to the conversation of how to preserve and protect the park, which is natural land. Thank you, Hannah Rapson 1415 E Davenport Irish Tract Home From: darcy128Cabaol.com To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Cc: darcy128Cabaol.com Subject: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning - again Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20213:28:29 PM I RI$H Dear Mr. Heitner and Ms. Russett, I'm am very dismayed to be writing to you again so soon with regard to the rezoning of the land proposed as Hickory Trail Estates. I find it impossible to believe that there was ample time to thoughtfully consider all the issues raised at the last meeting and to draw up a proposal that would in any way justify overturning a 7-0 vote against. Lots 28-41 still violate the single -load street requirement for development adjoining parks. They still impinge on the buffer zone. The removal of five lots from the park -side of the development only to jam them into the north side hardly addresses the concerns of the attendees at the last meeting nor does it follow the NE District Plan or the Comprehensive Plan, already in place. Much time was spent discussing the nursing home size, including height violations at the last meeting, and it isn't even mentioned. Why does the city have these plans in place if they are not to be followed? People within the park will be subjected to so much more noise from people not to mention car traffic. This road could easily become a cut through for people coming from Scott Boulevard. With that in mind, the removal of lots 28-41 would create a single -loaded street, which is to be used in city development close to parks. An aside, why am I having to write this under such a time constraint? I've only been notified five days ago if you count last Friday night, and the meeting will take place within a week of notification. If you have any fewer participants or emails than last time, it might be accounted for by the fact that this meeting was scheduled during a major school break for this area. Hmmm... might this have waited one more week? This development is already going to severely impact the enjoyment of the park. This park is a City of Iowa City treasure and should be kept that way. I have been a user of this park for at least fifty of my sixty -plus years and I have seen the many changes that have come, some of them very good but this one, as proposed, will be among the worst. I am a wheelchair user now and we often go to the end of Hickory Trail on a nightly walk. The beautiful prairie grasses and abundant animal life is a joy. Make no mistake. First Avenue traffic behind us is still plenty loud but if this were a street with houses on two sides, the north side of the park will never be the same. Please do the right thing and minimize this development by keeping within the NE District Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, already in place. Please forward this comment to the Planning and Zoning commission. Darcy Lipsius 2639 Hickory Trail From: Cherie Haury-Artz To: Raymond Heitner Subject: rezoning the ACT parcel Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20214:01:42 PM I would encourage the Planning and Zoning Commissioners to deny rezoning the ACT parcel until Joe Clark, the developer, presents a development design that respects the City's Northeast District Plan and Comprehensive Plan to protect Hickory Hill Park. Hickory Hill Park is an important natural resource for Iowa City and Johnson County and the City has spent time and energy developing a comprehensive plan for good management. This plan needs to be respected and followed by ALL developers to protect our valuable resources. Sincerely, Cherie Haury-Artz 1104 Yewell Street Iowa City, IA 52240 From: Robin Kopelman To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Trail rezoning Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20214:26:41 PM a Dear Mr. Heitner, I am writing to you again as a resident of a neighborhood adjacent to Hickory Hill Park, daily user of the park, and co -leader of the Iowa City Trail Sisters. Our family of six remains opposed to the rezoning proposal, with its (clearly) minimal revisions. Our concerns remain its incongruence with the Comprehensive Plan and Northeast District Plan. Lots 28-41 in particular would negatively impact the park experience, with an objectionable buffer adjacent to well -traveled and highly beloved trail paths. Developing single loaded streets near the park is the only appropriate proposal. Sincerely, Robin Kopelman Todd Kopelman Robin Kopelman From: Synan. Ann To: Raymond Heitner Cc: Anne Russett; Synan, William J Subject: Comments for Meeting of Planning and Zoning Commission March 18, 2021-- Hickory Trail Estates Planned Rezoning Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20214:55:12 PM r Dear Anne and Ray, Please forward our comments below to the Planning and Zoning Commissioners for the March 18th Meeting. Thank you. Ann Synan Dear Planning and Zoning Commissioners: We were encouraged by your 7-0 vote at last month's meeting to deny the developers' request to rezone the 48.75 acres adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. We are thoroughly disappointed with the miniscule revision to the revised plan that the developers and the Planning and Zoning staff are presenting to you at tomorrow night's meeting. The revised plan to build single-family homes along the west side of the parcel next to the park and an assisted living/memory care facility in the East part of the parcel, continues to ignore the Comprehensive and Northeast District Plan, disregarding single -loaded streets aimed at preserving areas such as Hickory Hill Park, and featuring a massive three-story building and complex that would take up almost nine acres (1/5) of this proposed residential community and which would abut on Hickory Hill Park and the adjacent Bluffwood and Hickory Heights Neighborhood. It appears to us that the developers and the Planning and Zoning staff are trying every way that they can to make a square peg fit into a round hole. Again, we ask that you deny this proposed request and allow the property to remain under low density, single family zoning -- not medium density, or low density single-family with a "planned development overlay". We entrust that you will do the right thing and take the appropriate steps to help preserve the integrity and serenity of Iowa City's Hickory Hill Park and the character of the Bluffwood and Hickory Heights neighborhoods. Thank you for your consideration. Ann and Bill Synan 833 Cypress Court Iowa City From: Jane Bradbury To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Rezoning land adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Wednesday, March 17, 20214:58:43 PM Hello Ray, I am writing to ask that you please vote against the proposed development by Hickory Hill Park as it currently stands. The resubmitted proposal does not satisfy the criteria outlined in the NE District Plan, which was created to protect Iowa City from development that is not in the best interest of the entire community of Iowa City. I would like to be clear and state that I am speaking about the entire community, not just those who live by the park. It is currently used by Iowa City residents from all over the city as well as many other Iowans who visit the park to enjoy birding opportunities that exist in the park. I am one such visitor. I do not live by Hickory Hill Park, and I must drive there to walk there daily. But it is worth it, because it is the only natural place in Iowa CIty of its kind, a place that gives visitors a real feeling of wilderness. Thank you for your time. Jane Bradbury 316 Dartmouth From: Riley Gardam To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Regarding Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 5:30:17 PM I a RdS� Hello - I'm contacting you as a resident of Iowa City and a lover of Hickory Hill Park to express my concern regarding the development of the land adjacent to the park by Axiom. I've highlighted some points below that I believe need further consideration by this committee. I've also included some questions I would love to see posed to the developer and to this committee. Question #1: What projections for long-term use of assisted living facilities are informing the development of the senior living facility proposed for this area? I am concerned that the Baby Boomer generation is much larger than the following generations and that we, the residents of Iowa City, will be left with derelict buildings in sensitive natural areas that will no longer serve their intended purpose in just a few decades. Question #1A: What considerations, if any, have been made regarding the current pandemic in the development of the proposed assisted living facility? It seems irresponsible to consider building a facility like this with shared dining and bathroom spaces when we have recently identified assisted living facilities as a huge contributor to the spread and deaths related to COVID-19. Question #1113: Will these units be affordable for average Iowa Citians? Question #2: What have the costs associated with erosion control and deer management in Hickory Hill Park been like for the past decade? And can our budget for such expenses handle the increased expenses that will likely result from this development? (See note in the plan citing 19% of critical slopes in the park will be impacted by this development). Our plan states an emphasis on groves and woodlands in new developments in sensitive areas should be considered. I have not seen any grove or woodland included in the plan, other than Outcrop A which is not viable for development anyway and therefore does not represent any concession on the part of the developer. The new proposal only sites that 115 of the required 132 trees will be planted by the developer - not only has no thought been given to creating a "woodland" or "grove", but the bare minimum for this type of mitigation has been completely overlooked. Question #3: Has the fact that the traffic study was conducted during a pandemic when traffic through the area is at an all-time low been taken into consideration? I know several major employers located immediately within this area are not requiring employees to work from the office at the time the study was conducted. It seems completely inappropriate to cite any traffic study conducted during this period, especially considering the fact that the fire station is located immediately adjacent to the major intersections that would be affected. This seems to pose an immediate threat to safety and response times in our area. Question #4: Why has the waiver for the height of the assisted living facility been considered reasonable? What is reasonable about building a 4 story building in an area our comprehensive plan has placed a 2 -story limit on? Other points of note: The buffer shown in the Comprehensive Plan is at least 175 to 200 feet wide (based on using existing lot lines for scale). The proposed plan offers only 35 feet of buffer between the backyards of houses and the park in a couple of spots along the west and south boundaries of the development area. Additionally, once Outlot A is ceded to the City and becomes part of HHP, there is no buffer between the park and the 10 -unit condo proposed for the NW corner of the development area. One goal of the buffer is to minimize the visibility of residential development from the park. The few trees that the developer offers to plant instead of a wide buffer will not achieve this goal. Concerning the developer's conveyance of Outlot A to the City, Outlet A is undevelopable due to steep wooded slopes, wetlands, streams, and the Sensitive Areas Ordinance. It is therefore no concession on the part of the developer. Outlot B is likewise essentially undevelopable. Additionally, it is not clear that the open space that is being dedicated for required Neighborhood Open Space meets the criteria for being usable as required by the zoning code. The developer is seeking waivers of zoning requirements to allow a large senior -living complex in an otherwise single-family zone. The developer is seeking zoning incentives from the City but is not adhering to the Comprehensive Plan's vision in exchange. Thank you for your consideration. Riley Larson Riley. Gardam ft_gmai1.com cell: 515.249.2545 Iowa City, Iowa From: Lauren Katalinich To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 5:41:13 PM Dear Mr. Heitner, Hickory Hill is near and dear to my heart, as it is to so many in Iowa City. The Planning and Zoning Commissioners need to follow the Northeast District Plan and to deny the rezoning request of the developer. Here's why: • Considerable public input went into the Northeast District Plan. It represents a consensus. • The Northeast District Plan clearly seeks to protect HHP by transferring development away from the park toward 1 st Avenue. • The proposed project ignores and does not comply with the guiding principle of the Northeast District Plan is the use of single -loaded streets to preserve areas such as Hickory Hill Park, to create public vistas, and to provide public access to natural areas. • The Northeast District Plan's principles are so fundamental they were also included in the Comprehensive Plan, pp. 46-47. Perhaps the most important point here is that the Plan seeks to: -Discourage parks that are surrounded by private property; encourage development of parks with single -loaded street access. Please deny the rezoning request because it does not adhere to the Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast District Plan. The citizens of Iowa City expect the Commission to follow the plans that were approved and to do what they said they would do in 1999. Please reject this rezoning request. Sincerely, Lauren Katalinich 418 5th Ave Iowa City From: Eva Adderlev To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 11:35:42 PM a Dear Raymond Heitner, I am writing to express my concerns about the new development proposal for some acreage of Hickory Hill park. The first proposal was denied because it failed to demonstrate a plan to develop thoughtfully, with minimal harm to the park. The new proposal protects fewer acres of Hickory Hill, and includes double -access roads that would greatly expand damage to sensitive natural habitat, one of the very things that was decided against after the first proposal. Hickory Hill is deeply important to our community and our ecosystem. It is one of very few forested parks within the city limit, and it provides vital natural habitat for our animal neighbors. Nature is precious, and it is finite. When it is gone, it is gone. Iowa is one of the most developed states in the entire country, due to sprawling farmland that has eradicated a horrifying percentage of natural prairie and forests. The effects of human impacts on the environment are becoming more and more keenly felt every day. Climate change rears its head each year with record-breaking polar vortexes. Destruction of natural habitat may even have contributed to the coronavirus outbreak, as animals lose their habitat, move into the cities, and bring their diseases with them. Never has there been a more prescient time to talk about --and work towards-- healing our planet than now. Never has there been a worse time to recklessly develop sensitive natural habitat that we will never get back. But it's not too late to protect the natural bounty and wonder that still remains. This starts small. It starts local. It starts with us. I hope that you will join myself and everyone else who seeks solace in the sunlight filtered through the snow -dusted branches, or strength in the green shadows dancing through the leaves, as we work to nurture this irreplaceable part of our planet. Sincerely, Eva L.0 Adderley From: Anne Russett To: Xristi Thiel" Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Planning and Zoning Commission Confirmation Date: Thursday, March 18, 20218:28:39 AM Hi, Kristi — Thank you for your comments. We will forward them to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Anne From: Kristi Thiel <kwthiel@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 20214:46 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Re: Planning and Zoning Commission Confirmation R]Sk{ Dear P&z Committee, I would like to respectfully request that you strongly consider denying the updated plan to develop the Hickory Trail extension. This development does not appear to follow the city's master plan. Specifically, the street along the park is not single loaded and includes 14 lots that directly back into Hickory Hill Park. This park is a resource that is widely used by the community, with precipitous growth of use due to the pandemic. Please preserve this natural resource and deny the developers revised proposal. Thank you for your attention to this email, Kristina & William Thiel Residents - 2755 Hickory Trail On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 1:43 PM Anne Russett <no-replyl@zoom.us> wrote: Hi Kristi Thiel, Thank you for registering for "Planning and Zoning Commission". Please submit any questions to: Anne-Russett(@iowa-city.org Date Time: Mar 18, 202107:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada) Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: Click Here to Join Note: This link should not be shared with others; it is unique to you. Add to Calendar Add to Google Calendar Add to Yahoo Calendar Or iPhone one -tap From: Anne Russett To: "Nancy Smith" Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Hickory Hill Park Date: Thursday, March 18, 20218:43:03 AM Hi, Nancy - Thank you for your comments. We will share them with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Anne -----Original Message ----- From: Nancy Smith <nancyjsmith2@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 20217:28 AM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Hickory Hill Park To the Iowa City Planning and Zoning Committee: I understand that the Committee will meet tonight to consider a development close to the Hickory Hill Park on the present ACT land. I beg of you to consider what unchangeable damage approval of this would do. No longer would the park be the magical escape from city life that it is, with views on every hand being natural ones. It would become just another trail through the woods. The esthetics would be badly damaged. Please consider the quality of life we enjoy here, and save one of the few places that there is in town to go where one can get away from development. Thank you. Nancy Smith 609 Larch Lane Iowa City, IA 52245 319-338-3332 This email is from an external source. From: Anne Russett To: 'Rachel Garms" Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Hickory Trail Rezoning Date: Thursday, March 18, 20218:45:07 AM Hi, Rachel — Thank you for your comments. We will share them with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Anne From: Rachel Garms <rgarms@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 20218:35 AM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Hickory Trail Rezoning As a former resident of Iowa City (now Solon resident) and a frequent user of Hickory Hill Park both past and present, I am writing regarding the proposal of a development near the park. Hickory Hill park to me is the crown jewel of Iowa City. Once this land is developed, there will be no other options for future expansion of the park. I hope that the city has considered purchasing this land as an extension of the park. If that is not an option, I hope that you really consider what this development will look like. The reason our family uses the park is to experience nature, utilize the nature trails, and get away from urban life. If this development goes in as it is currently proposed, we will be looking at exactly what we are trying to get away from (urban sprawl) and the reason people come to enjoy the park in the first place. Thank you, Adam and Rachel Garms From: Brian Richman To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Subject: Proposed residential development abutting Hickory Hill Park Date: Thursday, March 18, 20219:35:30 AM Ftl$H Mr. Heitner, Ms. Russett and Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to register my opposition to the proposed development in its current form of land abutting Hickory Hill Park. Hickory Hill Park is an exceptional natural resource for the people of Iowa City. When I moved here in 2001, it quickly became one of my favorite destinations—a spot where I could explore trails, see wildlife, meet friends, walk my dog and simply get lost in an area that felt wholly apart from the city around it. The current proposal threatens that sense of separateness. The overly dense and improperly buffered residential development represents nothing less than a transfer of a valuable asset from the people of Iowa City to the developer. That transfer is also inconsistent with guidance the City has previously provided in its Comprehensive Plan and its Northeast District Plan. I encourage you to reject development proposals for this parcel until the landowner can come up with a plan that meets the City's established guidelines—one that does not deprive the citizenry of Iowa City of its enjoyment of this irreplaceable public natural resource. Very sincerely, Brian Richman 20 Ashwood Dr. Iowa City From: Marybeth Gardam To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Park Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 1:58:00 PM a Dear Mr. Heitner I am writing as a citizen of Iowa City to express my concern over the development plans for the Hickory Hill Park area. For one thing, it concerns me that the planning and traffic pattern study for this development was conducted during a pandemic when many people are NOT driving who will ordinarily be on that part of the roads. And there is a firehouse near there, which means that it could endanger drivers and citizens needing fire protection if the traffic from a new development is added. Secondly I'm not convinced that long term the city will need more senior living facilities. The baby boomers are a much larger part of the local demographic than younger aging populations. We won't always need so many of these facilities, and they will become derelict and hard to care for. Third, what have the costs associated with erosion control and deer management in Hickory Hill Park been like for the past decade? And can our budget for such expenses handle the increased expenses that will likely result from this development? (See note in the plan citing 19% of critical slopes in the park will be impacted by this development). Our plan states an emphasis on groves and woodlands in new developments in sensitive areas should be considered. I have not seen any grove or woodland included in the plan, other than Outcrop A which is not viable for development anyway and therefore does not represent any concession on the part of the developer. The new proposal only sites that 115 of the required 132 trees will be planted by the developer - not only has no thought been given to creating a "woodland" or "grove", but the bare minimum for this type of mitigation has been completely overlooked. In summary I urge the city planners to reconsider this development. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Marybeth Gardam 68 Eversull Lane, Iowa City IA 863-651-4888 From: Anne Russett To: "nancy footner" Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Planning and Zoning Commission Confirmation Date: Thursday, March 18, 20213:37:53 PM Hi, Nancy — Thank you for your comments. We will share them with the Commission. Anne From: nancy footner <nfootner@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 20213:34 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Re: Planning and Zoning Commission Confirmation fi F?I$H Dear Ms Russett, and P&Z commission members. I am writing to express my opposition to the "revised " plan presented by the developer for the property adjacent to the N/E border of Hickory Hill park. I do not see that the developer has altered his plan sufficiently to stay with the guidelines of the Northeast District Plan, and I do not believe the plan, which came as a result of a great deal of citizen input should be adjusted to suit this (not local) developer's goal which is clearly to take advantage of proximity to a public, tax supported resource, Hickory Hill Park, to maximize their profits. Hickory Hill Park is a rare and precious resource, an urban park, and the commission must protect it, for the benefit of the citizens. Nancy Footner 2008 Dunlap Ct Iowa City, IA 52245 On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 8:30 AM Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(@iowa-city.org> wrote: Hi, Nancy — No problem. Their new proposal is included in the Commission's agenda packet, which can be downloaded here httDs://www. icaov.ora/citv-aovernment/boards/Dlann i na-and-zonina-commission The staff memo for this agenda item starts on page 52 of the packet. The Zoom link is: https://zoom.us/meeting/register/tJMtceCrgzMiGtHRYdNFfGxUsOmlbaWmr681 Let us know if you need anything else. Thanks, Anne From: nancy footner <nfootner(@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 20217:15 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(@iowa-city.org> Subject: Re: Planning and Zoning Commission Confirmation Anne Your colleague sent me notice that the developers will be presenting a new plan for the HH project Thursday. I deleted his email by mistake. Please send me the link and also a way to see their new proposal prior to the meeting. Thank you. Nancy Footner On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 8:57 PM Anne Russett <no-replly(@zoom. us> wrote: Hi Nancy Footner, Thank you for registering for "Planning and Zoning Commission". Please submit any questions to: Anne-Russett(@iowa-city.org Date Time: Feb 18, 202107:00 PM Central Time (US and Canada) Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: Click Here to Join Note: This link should not be shared with others; it is unique to you. Add to Calendar Add to Google Calendar Add to Yahoo Calendar Or Whone one -tap US: +16465588656„92275977904# or +13017158592„92275977904# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1646 558 8656 or +1 301 715 8592 or +1312 626 6799 or +1669 900 9128 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1346 248 7799 Meeting ID: 922 7597 7904 International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/aeCRNowgfg You can cancel your registration at any time. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. From: Rachel Kilbura To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Subject: FW: Preserve the park! Date: Thursday, March 18, 20213:50:35 PM Sent to City Council today. From: Susan oliver <susan.oliver@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 20213:08 PM To: *City Council <-43dfb@iowa-city.org> Subject: Preserve the park! fi RI$ki Hello. I am an Iowa City resident I am writing in regards to the proposed development alongside Hickory Hill park. This should be an easy decision, no more buildings. HHP is a very special natural oasis inside an ever enlarging city. We need to protect the park. There is so little natural land left in the entire state of Iowa, and here in the middle of Iowa City we have a beautiful gem. Think of Hickory Hill as our version of NYC Central Park. Can you imagine how sad it would be if we permitted builders to start nibbling away at the edges of Central Park? In short order, there would be no park. I plead with you to do the right thing, say no to big money, say no to destroying something that can't be replaced. There's lots of places to put new houses without encroaching on Hickory Hill. Thank you for your service to our city. Sincerely Dr Susan Oliver, DVM From: Hillary Schofield To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Hickory Trail Estates Rezoning on 03/18/21 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Date: Thursday, March 18, 20214:52:20 PM Attachments: imaae001.ona image002.a_na image003.a_na image004.1)_ng_ image005.a_ng I Hello Raymond, I am writing to express my objection with this (barely) revised OPD plan. This is honestly insulting considering the community discussion that went into the last meeting and the expressed reasons for the Commission denying the developer's original plan. It was made clear that single -loaded streets are the point of possible compromise between those of us advocating for HHP and the developers. I imagine the developers are hoping that the public has lost interest. In this time of ecological and climate instability, every last effort should be made to preserve and restore wild areas. We cannot keep going this way, developing every last piece of land that someone gets their hands on and can make a dollar (or millions) off of. It is not working, we are in dire straits. Honestly, this land does not belong to ACT or the developers, nor the City, despite what papers say. If any humans have the true rights to it, that would be the Indigenous peoples who thrived here prior to colonization. They are the rightful stewards of this land. I am not an expert on these matters, but as I understand it, these are primarily the Ioway, Sauk, and Meswaki peoples. Is this development thoughtful of long-term effects? Largely, no, not at all. And it largely plays into systemic power privileges that are already dominating (and, might I add, harming) everything. Please try and open your lens very wide. There is no reason to indulge these developers, the City could say no to the whole thing. That would be the truly smart move: thinking ecologically long-term. In order for humans to thrive we need other creatures thriving as well. If we keep putting humans front and center we will no longer exist. Thanks, Hillary Schofield Iowa City resident On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 4:06 PM Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner&iowa-city.org> wrote: All, The applicant for the Hickory Trail Estates rezoning has submitted an updated OPD Plan. This plan will be discussed at next week's Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on Thursday, March 18th at 7pm. STAFF REPORT - UPDATED To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Item: REZ20-0016 Date: February 18, 2021 Originally Published: February 12, 2021 Republished: February 16, 2021 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Axiom Consultants 60 E. Court Street, Unit 3 Iowa City, IA 52240 319-519-6220 MWelch@Axiom-con.com Joseph Clark 221 E. Burlington St. Iowa Citv. IA 52240 Nelson Develoament 1. LLC ATTN: Jacob Wolfgang 2186 th Ave., Ste 200 Des Moines, IA 50309 JacoNaMelsonconstruct.com Property Owner: ACT, Inc. ATTN: Jason Happel 500 ACT Drive Iowa City, IA 52243-0168 Jason. Happel(d)-act.org Requested Action: Rezoning from Interim Development — Single Family (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). Purpose: Development of single-family housing and a senior living facility. Location: South of N. Scott Blvd, West of N. 1St Ave. Location Map: t K Size: 48.75 Acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Open Space, Interim Development — Single Family (ID -RS) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: RM -12, Low density Multi -family Residential RDP, Research Development Park ODP, Office Development Park South: P-1, Neighborhood Public East: RS -8, Medium Density Single Family Residential ID -RS, Interim Development — Single Family Residential ID -RP, Interim Development — Research Park West: P-1, Neighborhood Public RS -5, Low Density Single Family Residential Comprehensive Plan: 2-8 units / acres District Plan: Northeast District Neighborhood Open Space District: C8 Public Meeting Notification: Property owners and expanded area residents received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. This included residents to both the west in the Hickory Heights development and owners east of 1 st Avenue. Rezoning signs were posted on the site at both Scott Boulevard and 1 St Avenue. Staff has also worked with Friends of Hickory Hill Park to keep those involved informed of the application's progress and meeting notification. Additional signage was placed at kiosk locations at Park entrances (as requested by FHH). File Date: January 22, 2021 45 Day Limitation Period: March 8, 2021 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Axiom Consultants, applying on behalf of Joseph Clark and Nelson Development 1, LLC., has requested a rezoning from Interim Development — Single Family (ID -RS) zone to Low Density Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone for 48.75 acres of land located south of N. Scott Boulevard and west of N. 1St Avenue. The applicant intends to develop the property with a combination of approximately 43 detached single-family residential homes and 10 detached single-family condominium dwelling units over 39.37 acres. The remaining 9.38 acres would be developed with a senior living facility, which will contain approximately 135 bedrooms for its residents. The development proposes to extend Hickory Trail between 1 st Avenue to the east, and Scott 3 Boulevard to the north to accommodate the detached single-family housing units and senior living facility. A smaller curved private street, Hickory Commons, is proposed to house the detached condominium dwelling units. The Hickory Trail extension would provide connectivity for pedestrians, linking existing sidewalks along Scott Boulevard and 1St Avenue with trails within Hickory Hill Park. The applicant also intends to grant the entirety of Outlot A from the OPD Plan (approximately 10.86 acres) to the City as neighborhood open space. This would exceed the required open space contribution of 1.1 acres and would increase Hickory Hill Park's size by about 5.5%. Because the proposed development proposes removal of portions of a woodland in excess of the woodland retention requirements contained in section 14-51-9, "Wooded Areas", a Level II Sensitive Areas Review is required. A Level 11 Sensitive Areas Review requires submission of a sensitive areas development plan (SADP). Furthermore, a Level 11 sensitive areas review is considered a type of planned development and as such, must comply with the applicable approval criteria set forth in chapter 3, article A, "Planned Development Overlay Zone (OPD)". The applicant conducted a virtual Good Neighbor meeting on December 21, 2020. Staff has received several additional emails concerning the proposed rezoning, which are attached. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: The subject property is currently zoned Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS). In ID -RS zones, only plant related agriculture is allowed by right. This zoning designation effectively pauses development for a property until a time that the preferred use can be developed, and the property can be rezoned. Proposed Zoning: The applicant is requesting to rezone the entire property (48.75 acres) to Low Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). The RS -5 zone is intended to provide housing opportunities for individual households. The zone generally provides a collection of homes with larger lot sizes and setbacks creating neighborhoods with a limited density. While the proposed development does contain some single-family detached condominium housing and group living in the senior living facility, the OPD process allows for a mixture of uses, provided that additional criteria in section 14 -3A -4C of the City Code are met. General Planned Development Approval Criteria: Applications for Planned Development Rezonings are reviewed for compliance with the following standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Zoning Ordinance. The density and design of the Planned Development will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of land use, building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout. Density — Table 3A-1 from the City Code outlines the maximum allowable density for planned development zones. The applicant is requesting a rezoning to an OPD/RS-5 zone, which allows for a density of (5) dwelling units per net acre of land area (total land minus public and private streets right-of-way). The proposed development would include 53 detached single-family dwelling units. The senior living facility is considered a group living use, as the proposed facility most closely resembles the following criteria for a group living use from section 14 -4A -3B-1 of the City Code: "Rooming units contain private space for living and sleeping, but not for cooking. Bathroom facilities may be private or shared. There may also be shared kitchen and dining facilities and shared common rooms and amenities for all residents. The rooming units are furnished with locks through which one member of the group may prevent other members of the group from entering his/her C! private rooming unit. The residents may or may not receive any combination of care, training, or treatment, but those receiving such services must reside at the site." The senior living facility is estimated to have 135 bedrooms. These bedrooms are not included in the site's density calculation. The site has a net land area of 44.52 acres and 53 detached single-family dwelling units. Therefore, the site's proposed density is approximately 1.2 dwelling units per acre. This level of density is allowed within an OPD/RS-5 zone. Land Uses Proposed — The applicant is proposing two different land uses under the requested OPD/RS-5 zoning designation. The predominant land use will be in the form of detached single- family residential housing, which is allocated for development of 43 lots along the extension of Hickory Trail. An additional 10 single-family condominium -style dwelling units can be found on Lot 45 of the OPD Plan. Single-family residential land use within an RS -5 zone can be found in various locations around the subject property. The Hickory Heights subdivision, another OPD/RS-5 zoned subdivision, can be found to the west of the subject property. Several other RS -5 subdivisions can be found east of 1 It Avenue and south of Hickory Hill Park. The Hickory Pointe Condominiums building, located just east of the subject property, contains an OPD/RS-8 zoning designation. A group living land use (shown more closely in Attachment #6), which is intended to accommodate a senior living facility, is proposed in the southeast portion of the subject property. There are currently two different multi -family developments adjacent to the subject property. The first of which, Oaknoll East, can be found north of the subject property, along Scott Boulevard. The second of which, the Hickory Pointe Condominiums, can be found directly east of the proposed senior living facility. The addition of the senior living facility will help to satisfy an ongoing need for elder housing within the City, while increasing the diversity of housing that is offered in the Northeast District. The proposed senior living facility will be reviewed against the Multi -Family Site Development Standards during Design Review. Mass, Scale and General Layout— The applicant intends to develop 43 detached single-family residential homes. A waiver has not been requested for these homes through the OPD process, therefore, the homes will be required to conform to the dimensional requirements for detached single-family homes, as detailed in section 14-2A-4 of the City Code. All 43 detached single-family homes will be situated within the western portion of the subject property, all on the proposed extension of Hickory Trail to the west and north. Staff encourages connectivity within this neighborhood and supports the idea of having a continuous street extension in this area instead of two separate cul-de-sacs. The City's subdivision code allows cul-de-sacs when it can be demonstrated that a street cannot be continued. The applicant has demonstrated that this street can continue and connect with Scott Blvd. The applicant also intends to develop 10 detached condominium dwelling units, shown in Attachment #7 as Lot 45. These homes would be developed on a new private street, Hickory Commons. Staff requested the applicant to show imaginary lot lines on the OPD plan for comparison to the RS -5 zoning standards as required per 14 -3A -4K. The proposal meets the standards of the RS -5 zone and the applicant is not requesting any waivers from development standards. Lastly, the senior living facility will be reviewed against the Multi -Family Site Development Standards during the project's Design Review phase. At a ground -floor area of 69,060 square feet, the footprint of the senior living facility will be considerably larger than that of the Hickory Pointe Condominiums building, which has a footprint of only 1,499 square feet. The applicant has requested a waiver for the maximum height requirement of 35', requesting an allowable height of 40'. The senior living facility would be a 3 -story structure, compared to the Hickory Pointe Condominiums building, which is only 2 stories. 5 Open Space — The proposed development will need to comply with private open space standards, outlined in section 14-2A-4 of the City Code. The senior living facility will be required to accommodate 10 square feet of private open space per bedroom, for a total of 1,350 square feet of private open space. All single-family dwelling units will be required to accommodate 500 square feet of rear yard private open space. The open space proposed for the single-family uses on Lot 45 include a shared open space area along the private street. A neighborhood open space requirement of approximately 1.1 acres accompanies the proposed OPD rezoning. The applicant intends to eventually dedicate the entirety of Outlot A for future Hickory Hill Park, which is approximately 10.86 acres. City Code requires that at least 90% of the land required to be dedicated be located outside of floodways, lakes or other water bodies, areas with slopes greater than 15%, wetlands subject to federal or state regulatory jurisdiction and other areas the city reasonably deems unsuitable for neighborhood open space due to topography, flooding or other appropriate considerations. However, the Code allows land in addition to the required dedication amount to include lakes, ponds, creeks, other water bodies, wetlands falling under the jurisdiction of state or federal agencies and other sensitive areas including woodland areas. City Staff views the proposed 10.86 acres of dedication from Outlot A as sufficient abutting land that would be usable and extend the existing Hickory Hill Park. This addition would increase the Park's acreage by approximately 5.5% and result in Hickory Hill Park having street frontage along N. Scott Blvd. Prior to the City acquiring the land in Outlot A for Hickory Hill Park, Staff recommends that the applicant submit a Woodland Management Plan that shall consist of a plan to remove any invasive species within the Outlot A area, as well as removal of any hazardous trees or limbs. The plan shall be prepared by a woodland specialist and approved by the City Forrester. Invasive species removal will be the responsibility of the owner and must be completed prior to transfer of Outlot A to the City. In addition to the dedication of land from Outlot A, Staff recommends that the applicant provide the trail connections that are shown on the OPD Plan (Attachment #5). Traffic Circulation — The proposed development will be situated along an extension of Hickory Trail, from the existing stub at the western limits of the Hickory Pointe Condominiums site, west and north to Scott Boulevard. As this extension will result in a street with a block length longer than desired, Staff recommends that the applicant incorporate traffic calming devices to help reduce speeds and break up the long block length. Specifically, the OPD plan shows raised crosswalks at two locations that provide trail connection and access to the park. One location is between lots 40 and 41 and the other is near the senior living facility next to Lot 26. Staff also recommends that the applicant install trees within the right-of-way, as shown on the landscape plan (Attachment #5). The applicant's OPD Plan, shows a traffic circle on Hickory Trail, between Lot 8 to the east and Lot 45 to the west. During the final plat process, all traffic calming devices must be in locations approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2. The development will not overburden existing streets and utilities. The subject property can be serviced by both sanitary sewer and water. Public Works has indicated that both sanitary sewer and water mains have sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed development. Transportation Planning Staff requested that the applicant submit a traffic study which examined how the proposed development would impact traffic at the intersection of 1St Avenue and Hickory Trail. The traffic study (Attachment #8) submitted by Axiom Consultants (performed by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc.) indicates that the total average daily trips generated by the proposed development is 808 (404 entering / 404 exiting) split between the accesses to Scott Boulevard and M 1St Avenue at full build -out. During peak hours this breaks down to a total of 58 AM peak hour trips and 74 PM peak hour trips split between the two accesses — or less than one additional car per minute, on average, utilizing each access. The study shows that all movements at the 1 St Avenue / Hickory Trail access currently operate at a Level -of -Service D (or better) and remain at a LOS D (or better) with the proposed development. The study further shows the same is true at the proposed access at Scott Boulevard. As none of the individual movements at either intersection are anticipated to reach a failing Level -of -Service, Staff is not recommending any off-site improvements at this time as a result of the proposed development. Furthermore, 2018 Iowa DOT Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts show an ADT of 7,500 on 1St Avenue near Hickory Trail and 13,100 on Scott Boulevard near the proposed access. Given that the theoretical capacity of a two-lane arterial street is conservatively more than 14,000-16,000 trips per day at a LOS E, the additional traffic generated by the development alone will not over -burden Scott Boulevard or 1St Avenue as currently constructed. Iowa DOT collision data indicates there have only been (3) total collisions from 2015-2020 ((1) involving an animal) at the 1St Avenue / Hickory Trail intersection, which indicates there is not a concerning collision trend associated with the current traffic volumes or roadway geometry. 3. The development will not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. The subject property is bordered by two existing residential developments. The Hickory Heights Lane subdivision borders the northwestern portion of the property, while the Hickory Pointe Condominiums border the southeast portion of the property. The applicant's SADP plan is showing a minimum separation distance of 263' between the rear property line of the condominium dwelling unit lot (Lot 45) and the rear property line of the eastern Hickory Heights Lane properties. Furthermore, the condominium dwelling units will be down slope from the properties on Hickory Heights Lane, which should help to lessen their visual effect. Attachment #6 shows the proposed elevations for the senior living facility. The facility will be roughly four stories in height, which is about twice as tall as the Hickory Pointe Condominiums building to the east, but similar in height to the Oaknoll East buildings off Scott Boulevard. Additionally, the OPD plan is showing a separation distance of approximately 185' between the senior living facility and the Hickory Point Condominiums property. A combination of shade and evergreen trees are proposed to soften this transition to the east. The majority of the property borders Hickory Hill Park to the west and south. The applicant's OPD plan is showing a range of separation distances between the rear yards of the homes along the western and southern sides of the proposed Hickory Trail extension, and the current eastern boundary of Hickory Hill Park. The closest distance between the proposed home and the existing park boundary is approximately 35'. Each lot would have a 20' rear yard setback, which would put a minimum buffer distance of 55' between any house structure and the existing park boundary. The parcels within the southwest portion of the subject property would also be situated anywhere from 10' to 24' above the elevations within the Park's east side area. Staff understands that the proposed proximity to the Park will allow for some of the proposed homes to be viewable from within the existing Park limits. However, Staff does not believe that the placement of these homes will adversely affect light and air, property values or privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. Staff acknowledges that the homes along the west side of Hickory Trail will likely be viewable from the eastern portions of the Park. The City Forrester has discussed putting in additional landscaping with a mixture of evergreen and shade trees along the rear yards of the western properties to provide additional screening from the west. VA 4. The combination of land uses and building types and any variation from the underlying zoning requirements or from City street standards will be in the public interest, in harmony with the purposes of this Title, and with other building regulations of the City. Staff finds that the combination of land uses and building types meets the public interest. Staff finds the requested height waiver of 40' versus the allowable 35' in an RS -5 zone to be reasonable. Lastly, Staff recommends that no building permit shall be issued for any of the subject property until the City Council approves a final plat subdividing the subject property to confirm to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan: With respect to compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, Staff looks to the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast District Plan for direction. The Northeast District Plan features several areas of focus for the subject property's neighborhood (the Bluffwood Neighborhood) that are discussed in more detail below. Preserve Natural Features — The Plan emphasizes the use of cul-de-sac streets and single loaded streets (i.e. homes only on one side), where appropriate, to preserve sensitive areas. The Plan's intent is to preserve areas with ravines and potential wetland areas as a buffer along the eastern and northern edges of Hickory Hill Park. Additionally, the City's comprehensive plan encourages the development of single -loaded street along parks. The Bluffwood Neighborhood map (Figure #2 below) shows two cul-de-sac streets within the subject property. One cul-de-sac is stemming southward from Scott Boulevard, while the other is a westward continuation of an extension to Hickory Trail. Housing is shown mostly on both sides of the street on the northern cul-de-sac, with an exception for the southwestern portion of the cul-de-sac. The southern cul-de-sac shows housing only on one side of the street. A woodland buffer is shown on the map, but dimensions for how wide the buffer are not provided. Figure #2 - Bluffwood Neighborhood Map n Rather than constructing two separate cul-de-sacs, as is shown in the Plan, the applicant is intending to build one continuous through street between 1St Avenue and Scott Boulevard. However, section 15-3-2A-4 of the City Code states the following "Use of cul-de-sacs and other roadways with a single point of access should be avoided. Cul-de-sacs will be considered where it can be clearly demonstrated that environmental constraints, existing development, access limitations along arterial streets, or other unusual features prevent the extension of the street to the property line or to interconnect with other streets within or abutting the subdivision." In this instance, the applicant has demonstrated that a through street can be provided in this location without impacting the protected slopes to the east of the proposed street extension, or the wetlands that exist on the property. The preliminary OPD shows housing on both sides of Hickory Trail, which departs from the Bluffwood Neighborhood Map. The applicant is proposing at least 35' of separation distance between the rear yards of the western properties along Hickory Trail, and the existing eastern park boundary. Additionally, pending completion of a woodland mitigation plan, the applicant intends to grant the entire 10.86 acres of Outlot A to the City as neighborhood open space. This will technically remove the buffer distance on paper, but in practice, will keep a woodland buffer in this area, as it is absorbed into Hickory Hill Park. Provide Pedestrian/Bicyclist Connections — The Plan calls for an interconnected sidewalk system that is augmented by a trail system that will provide opportunities for people to walk, bike, or jog to various destinations. The applicant is showing 5' wide sidewalks along both sides of the Hickory Trail extension, which will connect with existing sidewalks along Scott Boulevard and 1 I Avenue. The OPD Plan also shows connections to the trail network in Hickory Hill Park at two different locations. One connection will be made about halfway through the street extension, between Lots 40 and 41 on the OPD Plan. The other connection will be made toward the southern end of the development, between the senior living facility and Lot 26 of the OPD Plan. Both trail connections will feature raised crosswalks to help slow down vehicular traffic on Hickory Trail and provide a more apparent connection from the crosswalk area to the Park's internal trail network. Build Streets that Enhance Neighborhood Quality — With respect to the subject property, this section of the Northeast District Plan focuses on providing traffic calming for local streets within the Bluffwood Neighborhood. As was stated earlier in the report, the applicant will be required to work with City Engineering Staff on providing the appropriate amount of traffic calming for this development as it moves to platting. Encourage a Reasonable Level of Housing Diversity — The Plan acknowledges that detached single-family residential housing will be the predominant land use in the Bluffwood Neighborhood. This matches what the applicant is proposing, as the majority of the Hickory Trail extension would be occupied by single-family housing. This section of the Plan reemphasizes the need for cul-de-sac street design and single -loaded streets, where appropriate. The design of a through street will provide the connectivity that is emphasized within the City's subdivision code, while providing limited impact to the property's existing sensitive areas. The City's Comprehensive Plan also encourages the development of interconnected streets as a means of reducing vehicle miles traveled each day within a neighborhood, providing more direct walking and biking routes to neighborhood destinations, and reducing the cost of providing City services. The Plan also calls for townhouses or small apartment houses at the edges of neighborhoods, where the increased density can take advantage of the being located near major arterial streets. In -lieu of small apartment buildings, the applicant is proposing condominium -style single-family 9 residential dwelling units, as shown in Attachment #7. The 10 -unit condo unit along with the proposed senior living facility, help to increase the types of housing available in this area. Create and Enhance Neighborhood Parks within the District (Natural Open Space/Buffer Areas) The Plan does call for buffering between Hickory Hill Park and the subject property, in an attempt to minimize the visibility of residential development from the Park. The Plan directs to accomplish this by shifting density away from the Park to the north, where small apartments and townhouses can take advantage of slightly higher prescribed densities. Buffer distance dimensions are not provided in the Plan. The applicant is showing a range of buffer distances between the rear yards of the OPD Plan and the existing eastern Park boundary. Still, it is the applicant's intent to grant the "buffer area" of Outlot A to the City for future use as an enlarged Hickory Hill Park. The Plan also calls for only trail linkages from the subject area to the Park, which the applicant intends to provide. Summary Staff recognizes that the proposed development does not perfectly match with the conceptual vision presented in the Northeast District Plan, particularly related to the single -loaded streets (i.e. streets with housing only one side). The plan shows housing on both side of the street near N. Scott Blvd and the remainder of the area with housing only on one side. The preliminary OPD plan also shows housing on both sides of the street near N. Scott Blvd and a single -loaded street east of the stream corridor. The proposed lots that do not perfectly match with the vision are the 15 lots between the two proposed trail connections on the east and south side of the Hickory Trail extension. The plan also encourages a buffer between any new development and the Park. The applicant has attempted to incorporate a buffer by showing a separation between the existing park boundary and the new lots. This buffer ranges between 202' and 35'. At the narrowest sections, the applicant has incorporated landscaping that includes deciduous trees. In summary, although the proposal does not perfectly match with the land use vision for this area, it does meet other comprehensive plan goals. It provides an interconnected street system, incorporates a variety of housing types, limits impact to sensitive areas, and provides an additional 10 acres of land to Hickory Hill Park. Sensitive Areas Review: The applicant has applied for approval of a Sensitive Areas Development, a type of planned development. The purpose of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance is to permit and define the reasonable use of properties that contain sensitive environmental features and natural resources and allowing reasonable development while protecting these resources from damage. Outlots A and B contain the vast majority of the site's sensitive features. Outlot A will be protected through the dedication to the City as an extension of Hickory Hill Park. Outlot B will be protected by a conservation easement. The single-family lots along the east side of Hickory Trail include a portion of the Outlot B conservation easement area. Staff has recommended that the lot boundaries conform with the conservation easement boundary, to avoid having a conservation easement area on a private lot. The following paragraphs describe the impact this development will have on the sensitive features of this site. Jurisdictional Wetlands- The purpose of regulating development in and around wetlands is to: 1. Preserve the unique and valuable attributes of wetlands as areas where storm water is naturally retained, thereby controlling the rate of runoff, improving water quality, recharging ground water resources, providing erosion control and lessening the effects of flooding; 2. Promote the preservation of habitat for plants, fish, reptiles, amphibians or other wildlife; 3. Minimize the impact of development activity on wetland areas; 10 4. Provide a greater degree of protection for many wetland areas above and beyond that provided by the federal and state government; and 5. Minimize the long-term environmental impact associated with the loss of wetlands. For this application, the subject property contains two wetlands, which are shown below in Figure #3. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 100 ft. buffer to be maintained between a regulated wetland and any development activity (14-51-6E-1). The Ordinance does allow for buffer averaging to be permitted where an increased buffer is deemed necessary or desirable to provide additional protection to one area of a wetland for aesthetic or environmental reasons. The applicant has not chosen to request buffer averaging for either wetland, as each wetland and wetland buffer will remain unimpacted. Stream Corridors - The purpose of regulating development in and around stream corridors is to: 1. Preserve the value of stream corridors in providing floodwater conveyance and storage; 2. Promote filtration of storm water runoff; 3. Reduce stream bank erosion; and 4. Protect and enhance wildlife habitat. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires the delineation of any stream corridor and its required natural buffer (14-51-7). The subject property contains two drainageways, neither of which have a delineated floodway, thereby requiring a 15' natural buffer between the stream corridor limits and any development activity. Both stream corridors are situated far enough away from the proposed construction limits that neither corridor will be impacted. Additionally, section 14-51-2D-2 of the City Code allows for Stream crossings, such as bridges, roads and culverts, or stream bank stabilization measures, provided they are designed to minimize any reduction of the flood carrying capacity of the stream caused by such structures and are in compliance with all federal and state regulations. Steep, Critical, and Protected Slopes — The purpose of regulating development on and near steep slopes is to: 1. Promote safety in the design and construction of developments; 2. Minimize flooding, landslides and mudslides; 3. Minimize soil instability, erosion and downstream siltation; and 4. Preserve the scenic character of hillside areas, particularly wooded hillsides. The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 2 ft. buffer for each foot of vertical rise of the 11 protected slope, up to a maximum buffer of fifty feet (50') (14-51-8D-1). The buffer area is to be measured from the top, toe and sides of the protected slope. No development activity, including removal of trees and other vegetation, will be allowed within the buffer. The SADP contains 321,719 square feet of protected slopes, but no disturbance to protected slopes. Approximately 19%, or roughly 62,125 square feet of critical slopes will be impacted by the development. Table 1 below breaks out the proposed impact to critical slopes. The City Code defines critical slopes as having a slope greater than 25% but less than 40%. Section 14-51-8E-4 states that a Level 11 sensitive areas review is required if more than 35% of critical slopes are disturbed. The applicant is proposing to only to disturb 19% of critical slopes, which is within the allowable threshold. Table #1 — Critical Sloae Summa r-xisiing %.niicai dopes irnpaciea dopes rovn-irnpactea 010pes 321,719 • ft 61,279 sq ft 216,414• ft .% (67%) Woodlands — The purpose of regulating development in and around wooded areas is to: 1. Reduce damage to wooded areas, particularly wetlands, steep slopes and stream corridors; 2. Reduce erosion and siltation; 3. Minimize destruction of wildlife habitat; and 4. Encourage subdivision and site plan design which incorporate groves and woodlands as amenities within a development. The subject property has approximately 30.4 acres of woodlands. The SADP plan (Attachment #5) shows that the development will preserve approximately 48% of woodlands. Table 51-1 from the City Code shows that the woodland retention requirement for an RS -5 zone is 50%. To offset the woodland retention requirement deficiency, the applicant must plant replacement trees at a rate of 1 tree per 200 square feet of disturbed woodland. This results in a tree replacement requirement of 132 trees. The preliminary SADP currently only shows 115 replacements trees. Staff has requested that the plan be updated to reflect the correct amount needed. Archaeological Sites — Attachment #9 shows an archaeological report that the applicant obtained from the Office of the State Archaeologist. The report shows that no previously recorded archaeological sites were recorded, and no newly recorded archaeological sites were identified. The report recommends no further archaeological work within the subject property. NEXT STFPS- Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. Staff plans to have this application on the March 16, 2021 City Council agenda, with public hearings set at the Council's March 2, 2021 meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ20-0016, a proposal to rezone approximately 48.75 acres of land located south of N. Scott Blvd. and west of N. 1St Ave. from Interim Development — Single Family Residential (ID -RS) zone to Low Density Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone subject to the following conditions: 1. In accordance with the subdivider's agreement at final platting, approval of a Woodland Management Plan that shall consist of a plan to remove any invasive species within the Outlot A area, as well as removal of any hazardous trees or limbs. The plan shall be prepared by a woodland specialist and approved by the City Forrester. Invasive species 12 removal will be the responsibility of the owner and must be completed prior to transfer of Outlot A to the City. 2. Provision of trail connections, as shown on the concept plan dated 01/18/2021. The trail connections should be provided in the same location as shown on the concept plan and must be constructed before public improvements to the corresponding subdivision are approved. 3. The final plat shall incorporate traffic calming devices, including but not limited to raised crosswalks at park entrances, in locations approved by and designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Where trees are shown on the landscaping plan, installation of right-of-way trees, to be planted by Owner or its successor, along the proposed Hickory Trial right-of-way. Said trees shall be planted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each lot, or, if said certificate of occupancy is issued during a poor planting season, by May 31 following issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Right-of-way trees shall be consistent with the approved landscaping plan that has been reviewed by the City Forrester. Trees shall be planted generally 30' apart, though the City recognizes that exact locations may vary depending on driveway locations, signage, and other utility conflicts. Final location and species of the trees shall be approved on a lot -by -lot basis prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. 5. No building permit shall be issued for any of the subject property until the City Council approves a final plat subdividing the subject property to confirm to the zoning boundaries established by the zoning ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Rezoning Exhibit 4. Applicant Statement 5. Preliminary OPD and Sensitive Areas Development Plan and Landscape Plan 6. Senior Living Facility Elevations 7. Lot 45 OPD Plan and Elevations 8. Traffic Study 9. Archaeological Study 10. Public Correspondence f'� .6 Approved by: _ delle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services REZONING EXHIBIT HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA PARCEL ID: / 11002153001 ZONING: CO \ 2041 N DUBUQUE RD I ZONING: RDP I I I 1725 N DODGE ST ZONING: P1 Jan 19, 2021 - 4:43pm M Ln J - f— M M c 0 0 U _ o HICKOk HEIGHTS I ZONIq: OPD/RS 5." m O PARCELID: 1002426001 ZONING: P1 r. L 800 CONKLIN LN ZONING: P1 r L r c O JVV-1 L -m N FLOOD LINE HICKORY HILL PARK 1439 E BLOOMINGTON ST ZONING: P1 2530 BLUFFWOOD CIR ZONING: RM12 640 STUART CT ZONING: RM12 lU bLUrrwUUU \ �0o-q ZONING: RM12 —------- ---- — —� - ZONIN ;OPD/ Whi To �W& -6 vow- —� ." ZONING: I I I yn I• / OPD/ �" RM 12A- gn\Civil-Survev\Sheets\200194 i I I - Rezoning Exhibit - -- PROJECT VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE APPLICANT INFORMATION: Ln M APPLICANT 1: APPLICANT 2: PREPARED BY: G. JOSEPH CLARK NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC DR ATTN: JACOB WOLFGANG C/O MICHAEL WELCH IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 60 E. COURT STREET, UNIT 3 W DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 1�o J 319-519-6220 NDUBUQUE RD Lu DC MWELCH@AXIOM-CON.COM APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: j a o N JOHN BEASLEY ATTN: BRYCE K. DALTON � 321 E. MARKET ST 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 Q a m BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM U UNE s L: 2 U w O Q 6i QOQGF 2 z O V U � O SJ , d i J 6 r = J � a z Z Y V r Z n r PROJECT o LOCATION 0 EVERCRE q% a ) OOD G\R G °o w OONRC�RR a A R D � � CEDAR ST T w z a Tu 0R DR GF DSC OOLUMBIA ORES 12 Lp,K p,VE < `" WINDSOR CT z o� cF Dov i� TOGA DR HASTINGS�V ROCHESTE AVE NOT TO SCALE APPLICANT INFORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING PART OF AMENDED AUDITOR'S PARCEL #2005110 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 521 PAGE 143 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS; COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL, THENCE N01007'52"W, 656.03 FEET; THENCE N01°41'17"W, 1094.66 FEET; THENCE N01038'34"W, 210.49 FEET; THENCE N01020'33"W, 538.67 FEET; THENCE TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE 1332.94 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD ON A 1018.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARING S65018'23"E, 1239.83 FEET); THENCE S27014'33"W, 924.73 FEET; THENCE S01014'34"E, 378.49 FEET; THENCE N77055'52"E, 649.63 FEET; THENCE S01015'42"E, 868.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S87054'07"W, 1302.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 48.75 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ZONING INFORMATION: Ln M APPLICANT 1: APPLICANT 2: PREPARED BY: G. JOSEPH CLARK NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC 221 E. BURLINGTON ST ATTN: JACOB WOLFGANG C/O MICHAEL WELCH IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 60 E. COURT STREET, UNIT 3 W DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM 319-519-6220 o °� z w O Lu DC MWELCH@AXIOM-CON.COM APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW KIRTON MCCONKIE JOHN BEASLEY ATTN: BRYCE K. DALTON � 321 E. MARKET ST 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 Q IOWA CITY, IA 52245 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM U LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING PART OF AMENDED AUDITOR'S PARCEL #2005110 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 521 PAGE 143 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IN IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS; COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL, THENCE N01007'52"W, 656.03 FEET; THENCE N01°41'17"W, 1094.66 FEET; THENCE N01038'34"W, 210.49 FEET; THENCE N01020'33"W, 538.67 FEET; THENCE TO THE NW CORNER OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE 1332.94 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SCOTT BOULEVARD ON A 1018.50 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARING S65018'23"E, 1239.83 FEET); THENCE S27014'33"W, 924.73 FEET; THENCE S01014'34"E, 378.49 FEET; THENCE N77055'52"E, 649.63 FEET; THENCE S01015'42"E, 868.85 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S87054'07"W, 1302.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 48.75 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ZONING INFORMATION: O N N Zcn e --I 0 M �7O ` U X0Z 0 U 2 0 X Q L Lu Lu Z 34 3: Z w �J 1611J 111( Ln M CURRENT ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: ID -RS OPD/RS-5 c::I- O W O N N Zcn e --I 0 M �7O ` U X0Z 0 U 2 0 X Q L Lu Lu Z 34 3: Z w �J 1611J 111( U) Lu 00 Z O Q J = Q U u LL J z ocl- Q Z(D Z Q O o N 0 Lu Ln M w Ln c::I- O W CV X N Q L W O Ln w z O Z IN w w o °� z w O Lu DC ° CV Ln Q LU o � Q r4 O U) Lu 00 Z O Q J = Q U u LL J z ocl- Q Z(D Z Q O o N 0 Lu SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 Ln M w Ln c::I- W CV X ( w Q L 0 Ln w z O Z IN w w o °� z w O Lu DC ° CV Ln a LU � Q O paC U DC U w O Q 6i L/)u z O V U � O , d i J 6 a V SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 Lu M w J C X ( w W L 0 w z O Z IN w w o °� z w O Lu DC ° CV c� d SHEET NUMBER: 1 OF 1 AXIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY December 17, 2020 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT FOR REZONING The proposed development area consists of a portion of Parcel 1002476002. The area being rezoned is approximately 48 acres of private property located west of N. 1St Avenue and south of N. Scott Boulevard. It is bounded on the south and west by Hickory Hill Park. The current zoning classification is ID -RS — Interim Development Single -Family Residential. The Applicant is seeking to rezone 36.60 acres of the property to RS -5 — Low Density Single -Family Residential and 12.21 acres of the property to RM -20 — Medium -Density Multi -Family Residential. The total area being re -zoned is 48.81 acres with 1,332.95 feet of frontage on North Scott Boulevard. There are approximately 14 acres between the proposed development and N. Scott Boulevard and N. 1St Avenue that are not included in this development and are not included in the rezoning application. Refer to the Rezoning Exhibit included with the Rezoning Application for additional information, including the legal description. Comprehensive Plan & District Plan The Future Land Use Map within the Comprehensive Plan shows this area as Conservation Design. The Conservation Design designation indicates the presence of sensitive features on the property. These features include wetlands, a waterway, steep slopes, and woodlands. The Northeast District Plan includes the property within the "Bluffwood Neighborhood" (Figure 1). The Bluffwood concept plan shows single- family housing and two cul de sacs on the south and west portion of the property. There is Neighborhood Commercial depicted on the southeast portion of the property (four red buildings on Figure 1) and Small Apartment Buildings shown on the northeast portion (five pink buildings on Figure 1). The plan shows wooded areas remaining along the waterway at the center of the property. Hickory Hill Park can be seen along the west and south of the property. The cul de sacs allow for a connection from Hickory Hill Park to the drainageway at the center of the property. Bluffwood Figure 1: Bluffwood Neighborhood from Northeast District Plan with Approximate Project Boundary Project Number 200194 Page 11 AxIOMCONSULTANTS Previous Projects A previous rezoning application for the property located at 831 N. 1St Avenue (immediately east of this project) was approved as a Planned Development Overlay Medium - Density Single -Family (OPD RS -8) and a twelve -unit, 3 - story building was constructed (Figure 2) in place of the Neighborhood Commercial shown on the Bluffwood plan. Project Overview The Applicant proposes to develop low-density single- family residential lots west of the waterway and a Senior Living Facility with Assisted Living and Memory Care east of the waterway. The south end of the Senior Facility building will be a single -story structure memory care, the center of the building will be a two-story structure containing the main entry, dining, common areas, and administrative areas, and the north end of the north end of the building will consist of three stories of assisted living apartments. Refer to Figure 3 for a rendering). Hickory Trail, which currently dead ends at the east property line, is being extended to the west and turn north to connect to N. Scott Boulevard. Figure 2: 831 N. 1st Avenue Proposed Project Area Shown in Red s AIL..- Figure 3:Conceptual Rendering of the Proposed Senior Facility (looking northeast) Project Number 200194 Page 12 AxIOMCONSULTANTS Low -Density Single -Family Residential (RS -5) The Low -Density Single Family Residential (RS -5) zoning proposed is consistent with the Bluffwood plan. The applicant is not seeking adjustments to minimum area regulations or setbacks. Instead, the applicant will enforce a larger front yard setback of twenty-five feet within the Restrictive Covenants of the subdivision. The proposed single-family development will avoid protected slopes, provide the required 50% woodland preservation, and meets other regulations of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance as required by City Code. Conservation Easements will be utilized to set aside and protect sensitive areas. A buffer will be provided between the rear of the single-family lots that are adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. Medium -Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -20) The Applicant is seeking Medium -Density Multi -Family Residential zoning at the southeast corner of the development to support a Senior Living Facility. The project incorporates specific features to ensure it is compatible with the surrounding area and the vision for this portion of Iowa City. The proposed building and site have been designed to take advantage of the existing topography to prevent the building from dominating the view. The existing topography rises from the southwest to the north east corner of the RM -20 portion of the site. The building has a single -story on the south and three -stories on the north (refer to Figure 3). This prevents the mass of the building from dominating views from the park. The building is set into the existing site with a first -floor elevation of 735 and the eave on the tallest portion of the building is at an elevation of approximately 768. The elevation of the northeast corner of the property 768 and N. 1St Avenue is at an elevation of 760 in this area. This allows the natural grade along N. 1St Avenue to block the building from view as pedestrians and vehicles travel along N. 1St Avenue. Refer to the Site Plan included in the rezoning submittal. The proposed building and site achieve the density desired by the Applicant without a large footprint or excessive amounts of impervious area. The zoning suggested on the District Plan would allow for a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of up to 1.0. The proposed site has a FAR of 0.3. Another measure of building density on a property is the amount of impervious surfaces (pavement, sidewalks, roof top). Impervious areas averaging eighty-five percent are common in commercial areas. This building and site combine for an impervious area of 40%. This relatively low amount of imperviousness is by design. The building features an interior courtyard within the memory care wing and a community garden space east of the dining and kitchen facility. Parking is located along the loop road, where possible, to minimize the pavement associated drive aisles in traditional parking lots. There is ample green space along the west and east sides of the loop road to help provide buffers to adjacent properties. Each of these features combine to reduce the imperviousness of the site. The Applicant is committed to planting replacement trees to achieve the 20% woodland retention requirement of this zoning designation. These trees will be planted along the west, east, and south portions of the Senior Living facility. These plantings will enhance the view from inside the building, provide unique spaces on the property for outdoor activities, and protect the views from those looking at the property from either the park or the single-family portion of the development. Project Number 200194 Page 13 AxIOMCONSULTANTS City Utilities There is city water along the north side of N. Scott Boulevard and water at the end of Hickory Trail. These will be connected to create a loop. There is sanitary sewer at the dead-end of Hickory Trail and along the waterway south of the project. These have been designed to be extended to serve this property. Private utilities such as gas, electric, and communications are also available. Storm water management is provided by an existing basin downstream of the project. Sensitive Areas Detailed Analyses have been undertaken and, in addition to the woodlands and the waterway, have documented the presence of wetlands and protected slopes. The Office of the State Archaeologist has completed a field investigation and determined that no further archaeologic investigation is required. A Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan accompanies this application. The development has been designed to avoid the sensitive features and minimize impacts. Protected slopes have been avoided completely and less than 20% of critical slopes are impacted. Hickory Hill Park The development team has met with the Friends of Hickory Hills Park (FHHP) to gain their insight to the development. The two groups are seeking areas where the goals of the development and FHHP align and are discussing how each can benefit from this relationship. The Applicant will also be utilizing the Good Neighbor Meeting process to seek additional community input. Sincerely, Michael J. Welch, PE Project Engineer Project Number 200194 Page 14 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA NOT TO SCALE 1 NDUBUQUE RD 5\ QG� �O �N N 50051 8 Jo n o � Y D v o D Z r D PROJECT o LOCATION o EVERORE Nm y/C U u o A� HICKORY TRAIL PWCrton Creek V.I OOD �U4 0\R PROJECT VICINITY MAP ninTPq- 1. NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ARE PRESENT. KEY NOTES: i \\ \\ `1111 /\ \ \ \\I\\\I/ \\ `� \ `\ CONSERVATION EASEMENT HATCHED AREA REPRESENTS AREA INCLUDED \ \ \ \ I IN WOODLAND RETENTION CALCULATION \\ \\\I \\I III 11 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 © 10' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT i184,1p7jSF/ OUTLOTS: OUTLOT SF ACRES A 473,268 10.86 B 180,396 4.14 ROW 184,197 4.23 I LEGEND: INTENDED USE DEDICATED TO CITY FOR PARK SPACE O CONSERVATION EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR HICKORY TRAIL EXTENSION SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR - INDEX — 100 — 100 CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE — 101 — 100 FENCE: BARB WIRE —x—x—x— —x—x—x— STREAM CENTERLINE - - - — - - - SIGN o 0 CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS � TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE � OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT - - SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) IMPACTED STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) CRITICAL SLOPE (25-40%) IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE — (25-40%) PROTECTED SLOPE (> 40%) WOODLAND PRESERVATION ++++++++++ IMPACTED WOODLAND WETLAND PRESERVATION BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR --- `771 L I PROPOSED TREE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN ° eb 11, 2021 - 4:51pm '' c) �K Q' C1.00 OVERALL SENSITIVE FEATURES o PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -SENSITIVE SLOPES C1.20 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WOODLAND AREAS C1.30 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WETLAND AND BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR Q C,6 a SHEET INDEX C1.00 OVERALL SENSITIVE FEATURES C1.10 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -SENSITIVE SLOPES C1.20 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WOODLAND AREAS C1.30 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS -WETLAND AND BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY CLERK DATE APPLICANT 1: G. JOSEPH CLARK 221 E. BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW JOHN BEASLEY 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM / \ I 121 -------� JAI � �, � • �� � \\ `\ \ \ \ S • T , • J_ CID ---- . �\f / I Q 6' rSJ - - - _ _ \ \ �\ \ \ \ I \ \ \ / \ O 0 \\ \ \ I \ Ao `\ I I \ --- __ ) / � � / \ 11 1 I � I I I I I I 1 /�//• + + 1 I \ \ I\ 11 11 I * y + y I+ +/ /+ / 1 I I I 1\ od Om lo I ' `�♦ �\ >\` --162 i/ // // / , , I I I / /,00 � / \�\ \\\� \\ \\ \\------ g `\`\\\\\ \\\�\1\\\\\\\. I \_ \. + / 1 I I I I 11, l I , ; \'� \. \>�\• > �• \ \ - / . ix- \\\\\ / / / 1\ \\\\\ \• \ \>\�\� �5 \\\��\\ \\ y '� \• \\\\ \\�\\\ \ • 1}14 1 I t 152 \ 1\� \\ \ �� \\\• / 1. WI1*+I{ \\\ \•, r 1 1 \ \ \\\\\��' \\ \\`\\ l \�\ \\\\\� >\\ / / "r''� ' n I I I \ SII I+I 1+1�+I p �+ t I #V v v v A A I I t \_�_+ +N.` \\ \ k \\ \\\ \\\\\ \ 408,54F \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ I 1 I \ \ �' f -r + I + +\ /r/ J+I I}I 1 } + >\ \ \\ \\ i\\ \ \ \ 1� / �\ \h \` \ � /T It \ +� + _ / \ \• `� \ \• ` 1 \ I 1 NN +\ +\+#%�+`+�i�\+\\r\O�\1\\,•'\ \+ \>\ \\\ \\ `-=- - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \,. t - # + +5+14 1 \ \ ] �`.?c\\ \'1 \��\ \\\ \\. ++/ +/+, +/ +J +l I \ t\+ \ + + +I i4 +\ \ t_ _ i��------_- // 11 \I �• � 1 --- \ +t+I+4+I +I ++ +\` + — l ,'—/ —/ fl ''` _ \\ —1�\� —soon —f- •. \\�� _—_� 1 / + \ Ir I+< ++ \ �►. /��� — r�— I r + + _' + — — — 1—• —+ �+ — _--------1` 71 1 +I I 4 + +, /+, /+�r�`+�\ +�' -rt-��� + \++\ '+ + a . - -� t \+ + + +, + +-+ +\ + \••�- \--- ly/ ♦ \ \ I I / '�/\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. \:/ i \ _--++ +��++++ +$+ +II + \+ ++, .r/+/,.+\�+�4�-�_f-+ +\ +\ +\ + + .tai} + + �-+\�/+ + +\ l + >\ >\ >\ y \ t +++++ fi / ++�+ �, \ \ 1 \ \\ \o \ / �\' \'`� - +1 +\ + / /+ #/,¢ / ,+/ \ , j't-r + + + Irl t 1+ I+ + + / �\+\+ + +v ,} +,+ + +�+ + + !r + + + + } \- �+ . - - \ ISI I \ \ \ \ / 4 + \ + +, / �� i + / ¢ l + + +\ + + t i+ +- +- + \+\ + + / + + / + 4 + + + + + + T } + t7 1- +T+ I \' j'i t b + + / + \ , r \ \ \ \� T �/ /45 \ \ .i / + V + /+ +/ !r\+ + _ + +1 + +l /r /t + -+- F_t + �- v + \ \ , / t + ♦k 1+ + > + + + +-+ r + +�+/+ /+ + \\/ •? �/ 1\ ! 1 \ \ / \ ++ r+++ + : /� 4 { +\+ �'+ + t+gyp / '/+� /+/+++++ i+/+_ + �; r + +\ \ *,+/ Vi+++++1' l + + + + J+ + \+\ +� �\ + /+ SFI > \ 8 71 F \\ \ �. / ! \'r �� / \ / \ t +_� + + # I+ + r +'+rte + �\ \\ F + + + + + \+ \\8,249 MJF � y -+ �� + + 1 _ + +/ 4 / / \ \ + + �. i \ \ " � s +� +% \+ .1 ,+/4/ */ i -+ \+ +\+\ / + + +l +l + + +i + \ \ If \ \ \ \ \ _ _ �1 \ �x / + / + + +\ \+ \ / \ + + + \ \ �� \ \ \\ � y� \ \ \ \ { �\• ` - --- � 1 \ \ � `'k + + + +�+ + \+ �+ .r 4. +`++ � ' %,'--_-- -� `\ \5;388-�__ ���\ \ � I� � \\� + \+ \\\ O /\ N N Z rn JEll o(n ` o U Oz V° U 2 O X Q Lu L z ,3 <�j Z w H Nz Lu Lu Q Q o C J m ~ u UL.u LJ W z o a w z Q z V a IZ o O u U N ~ Lu � z Ln O Lu D N Lu Q / / / / �` �+ /+ \ \ \����� \ �\\> \� \- >>.� -��8 _ •\ \ \� �\ - - i,+ # \ � -- f --- \ -1-4,q62SF 822 JF-_ Q9_ S �,+, t I -- "_�\ �\ \\\ >\ - \ \ ° a_-\ \,, \s \�\ \\ `•�.\\�` -- \' 23,8665 \ \\ \\15,�470S1=\ S /� ��+� �,+, ♦ X11#1 1 v A \ -� v A /� v - v v + I \ i+\�oca\ \ \ \\ — — \�� > \ \. r.\ \ \ \\ a \✓ 1 14,514 SF i 1 1 I + ++fid+/ ++ /+/+ (+/ 4 /+/ ♦♦t + / i� . _ _ \� \ \ - - l / l l $ � f +( I f \ i (+l l (+ \�r`r ♦ \ \ \ > \ _^� \\ o �\ ` \� \ \ o \\ e \ \ \ \ o I I I I I l + + J Lu 0 l 1 ,\ t \+ \+♦�`� a ♦ ♦ +�+ �++( /+/ \ / - - �li \ \ \ \ , \ \, ' \\` �- ° > > \ ` \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 I Z l J I / /• +I +` �4 ��+`\+\tea•\ter\� \+\`}\ # +\+ �.E�♦r \+\,�4 ♦ J +�'+ �\a°'f /if/�\+ + \ \\ / / / / / \ \\ 1 �---� \\\\\ \ �` � \ \g' / � \ �• ° - `oma \ � \\�\ \ \ \\ \ 1 I /1 I �� I I � / + / /J / l 1+ �\ �\+ \+ \+\4\\+\4\ +\ ♦ \, \ /Jr /+ter + \+ 1 / ,--- \\ \\\\ \ ��. \ \\ i \ \\ \ \ 0 \ 1 I \+ \+ +\ * ♦r \\ ''� \ \ \ , \ \� \ \ \ I I 16 36q SF' I I 7 O 1/ / +-I+ I+I +1 \ 0+¢f/ /\. 1 ✓// / / \\ \ \\\ + \`. \'\`. \� \ ° I o / T >- %—-I �T I I I I I I I V 1 + I - \ \ _ - _ + \ \ 1 I a J +/ + -c \+ \+ +/ + �\ \+\+\\� G,+/+ 1 I / /. / \ _ - - i \ i , / I- i i / I (� + \ \ ( ` �\VI / + + to \ z W l +/ / j' �' i •K ♦♦\fi*++l ,F l \'t\� ij4/+/' /\, 'II +1 I+I -i- / \ \ \ _ �/' / \.A T. �(� / T i % 21 a O +r++i++i i✓y+ f++++++++ w\ `\\♦ \ �,+ �\ + + i/+/ + I#1rl I 11+ + + +/ \ _- _/ 1 \\�-- ��I / X34, ,/'3 / '�.IJ l JI11 114,1169�F 1 I I I o / \I 11 lu \ /+ + + / / +/ 4 +\ + + + /+ + ♦ ♦ \♦ / /r/ I+ +\ + + + / / / +I Vrl I-{ + + + + + --- - / / / I _i / / / , I 1 1 I / +\ + I / W n / / /. + + + �/ � I + 4 /+/ +/ /+,/�/+/ y +j +' + + +` ♦ \♦ `\+ y +l + a` +` +\ +' / ,r� + / ' f~I I � + + + j/ // +\ - - 0 1 J -� /i/ _ \\ '` \ 1�-5� /' 5 8 BOO Sb 8, 5 SF/ /8,57 SF J/ / 10,1635 �F I I O i i W o + +i+ + ,r + + +.4 -+-t /+ #J +/i 4/+'/ t + ♦ \ / +/+ + A/ +/// 8, �4SF , / / / / / I I + + + + cA + -+ �r + +' 4 /+ /+/ /+i /+/ + ++}+++ + + b + + + ♦ ♦ +i+�\\ \+\\� } 4/* /�+'I� A 4 //! +++++t It \ I ''" 9,621�E- 8,540�b-' '8,127,Sf /� ,' /' , /' ,/ / / / ^ I I I 1 I 4 + + /+ / l jo \ W + 1% +i r/ /+/ */'+/+ + _+_t + 4 + + + v \ ♦ 1 /+l4 # +\\\� / /}/ I#I� + +,ii + +-+\ Iii +JT4,,!— � * '+ + +¢�+ + / I \\ / / / /,/ // // / I +I� o ++++1++(}+/+j+ / w \ +++i%' #fes ±*�i//��A/+++'s---r-r-� + +#+\ +++++ +I ++ t�+ ♦y +/±\�\\\ i/j++firllN} J~II/* +i++/+�+ + +\ 1i1+IST} + +���+ + ±_+ // I \\ - B - o�� / / /+moi+ + ���� �+ I + + I + + +l+ +l / I /1 / i'+ + r'+ + /j */+ +�-�� *-F - _ t + +\ + + + (�+ + ♦\+ + \\ �/j/ filtlit4ji\+ fi i +//fi�/+ +��+j+/+Ittl�t + + �r + -t \� + +i� +-� + l� I -_ _ '' / _ sem+ ! / +' \+ t +\ + \+ +\+t+ +\+ ++( \+ + F + +� + x + + _ + +�� +' \ I+ + + + + + + + +\ + y' +, +i� �/+ }-+ �`t + + + + + \ , }I + + +/ + / +'+ + + + + / / / yam+ �/ + + + r + + + + �- fi + + +-+ + + + + + + a +� + %�+,+ ,+//+++\ v_ a-+-+ t + \+ r +-� + r \ + + + ♦ ♦ ♦\ �� / + / y/+/+ + \+I l+ll+l + \+tel + + + + +"+ f 4i++++ + Ir /+/ I + i + �+ �+ + �+ + + + i + + + +\+ + + + +I + + + + + + \+ # +I + 1+++ 1 }\ + I +//+ i+ \+ I I \ * +� +#+4+/ +% +t +I + �+ +//+,/' \+ + a��+±+� ��++-+-+ + +\\ \ \\ ♦ l%� + +/ +/+/+\+\ +\\ ♦+ + + j f' t \ + l++ + I + +j+ + +. + F 1 + + s + + + I+ +,'+ I+ + + /+ +�+ ++}i\+ + + +I l+ �+ + + } + + +� +K*} + + + + , tf / + + + + + + I+ + + + # +/ + + F + + + # } \ +1 I + + + // + + + (+ + +/ / t l I O \ Jr + + + + +s �r \t-� + + /+j p \ + + + +\ +\ + 4 + /+ +¢+ /+++ + } / % /+/ �/ +/ \ ++++I+++++++++++ + + �.s + + + + + t + + + + + + + / / / + +/ + \+ + + /+ /+ I , + + + /+ + + I I W --- + + + +/ + +/+1 +\ +\ +1+ \+ +\t + + ice'+ + \r%� +_+--+ �y+�+\ +`�+�+++++++ + y♦♦ ♦` ♦ �� \t y +/ / �t+1I� \ +\/ \+ +\+h¢� F/� 1 7 + + /+,+l + + \ +\ +\ + 1r q +\f_ +_+rr � �, -+ + +--��\��\�\ \\ \\ t' +/ +j/+ / /+/} + I�11�11t#+ + } / +\ + + /+ /+ ' // /% +/�/+ + + +\ + + +-f + + + + + + + + + 4 + /` + + + � + + + +J + + +/+ + +\ +/+ 1 +f\ ++++� + fi t \+��` + +I + + h }I \ \ Z Z V + + + + + s f-+ + + \+\ fi+\�+� \+\ + + +, + + i �♦ i + t /+ 4 +/ + I+ Ilrll* + `_#� �+ + / r + + +J+/+ + / /+ \+\ + +\ + + j i'i-�-}-+-+--r'+ �r-+_tom + - - t + _ r + + + + + + + + r / \ I _ r + + + + + ` H w _�----------' 1 ( 1 1 I • �_� \\\` `- I I l \ I\ �- _�/// ,' . \ O\ � ��^� / / / , / III \�� \ \---__ -\ \� I \ I �-���`__-_'/ / III II I I \ i/ / / � \ - / \ \ \ \ __/ / / / / / / --- � �� I / // /' �' __� i p � / / / / � / / I I /\ 1 I I /\ J SHEET NUMBER: //,/ \\ \��\-_-\�\• \ � 111\�\\\\\ �__�� ii'�__-���� \\'� D l � �/ / / l: (\ 1\_--� ��`_-- - _-��� � I\ l \ ����___�/''\ III//I I \\\ // / _ �\\\ _�'/ / ' \ 1 1\ \\ \ \ \ / / �� / f ( 00 D� \ �} \ \ __-__- \ -_/ -��\ \ \ \ \ \ -��\ \ 1 I I 1 1 \\`�_ \ _-\ . 1 'lJ \° C \ \ \ \.+_� �-�,\� ��--��\\� \ \ \ �\ \ \ \` \�\\ l\I \I \ / / / /� \ \-'VTNhJuu\Il l I I 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \`_--/ / / / / / / / / /' `\\ �\ \\\` /� / / /I �� , , // / I / 1 I I , III I I I /l 1 • :ivil-Survey\Plats\200194-PP.dwg W z Q C,6 a � 0 � W ° Q J W a Q Q u ILu— z > o�c Lu 2 Qo Y ¢ o ? V V W z z w Ir W z , O= m '' ^^ V / w V / / / / �` �+ /+ \ \ \����� \ �\\> \� \- >>.� -��8 _ •\ \ \� �\ - - i,+ # \ � -- f --- \ -1-4,q62SF 822 JF-_ Q9_ S �,+, t I -- "_�\ �\ \\\ >\ - \ \ ° a_-\ \,, \s \�\ \\ `•�.\\�` -- \' 23,8665 \ \\ \\15,�470S1=\ S /� ��+� �,+, ♦ X11#1 1 v A \ -� v A /� v - v v + I \ i+\�oca\ \ \ \\ — — \�� > \ \. r.\ \ \ \\ a \✓ 1 14,514 SF i 1 1 I + ++fid+/ ++ /+/+ (+/ 4 /+/ ♦♦t + / i� . _ _ \� \ \ - - l / l l $ � f +( I f \ i (+l l (+ \�r`r ♦ \ \ \ > \ _^� \\ o �\ ` \� \ \ o \\ e \ \ \ \ o I I I I I l + + J Lu 0 l 1 ,\ t \+ \+♦�`� a ♦ ♦ +�+ �++( /+/ \ / - - �li \ \ \ \ , \ \, ' \\` �- ° > > \ ` \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 I Z l J I / /• +I +` �4 ��+`\+\tea•\ter\� \+\`}\ # +\+ �.E�♦r \+\,�4 ♦ J +�'+ �\a°'f /if/�\+ + \ \\ / / / / / \ \\ 1 �---� \\\\\ \ �` � \ \g' / � \ �• ° - `oma \ � \\�\ \ \ \\ \ 1 I /1 I �� I I � / + / /J / l 1+ �\ �\+ \+ \+\4\\+\4\ +\ ♦ \, \ /Jr /+ter + \+ 1 / ,--- \\ \\\\ \ ��. \ \\ i \ \\ \ \ 0 \ 1 I \+ \+ +\ * ♦r \\ ''� \ \ \ , \ \� \ \ \ I I 16 36q SF' I I 7 O 1/ / +-I+ I+I +1 \ 0+¢f/ /\. 1 ✓// / / \\ \ \\\ + \`. \'\`. \� \ ° I o / T >- %—-I �T I I I I I I I V 1 + I - \ \ _ - _ + \ \ 1 I a J +/ + -c \+ \+ +/ + �\ \+\+\\� G,+/+ 1 I / /. / \ _ - - i \ i , / I- i i / I (� + \ \ ( ` �\VI / + + to \ z W l +/ / j' �' i •K ♦♦\fi*++l ,F l \'t\� ij4/+/' /\, 'II +1 I+I -i- / \ \ \ _ �/' / \.A T. �(� / T i % 21 a O +r++i++i i✓y+ f++++++++ w\ `\\♦ \ �,+ �\ + + i/+/ + I#1rl I 11+ + + +/ \ _- _/ 1 \\�-- ��I / X34, ,/'3 / '�.IJ l JI11 114,1169�F 1 I I I o / \I 11 lu \ /+ + + / / +/ 4 +\ + + + /+ + ♦ ♦ \♦ / /r/ I+ +\ + + + / / / +I Vrl I-{ + + + + + --- - / / / I _i / / / , I 1 1 I / +\ + I / W n / / /. + + + �/ � I + 4 /+/ +/ /+,/�/+/ y +j +' + + +` ♦ \♦ `\+ y +l + a` +` +\ +' / ,r� + / ' f~I I � + + + j/ // +\ - - 0 1 J -� /i/ _ \\ '` \ 1�-5� /' 5 8 BOO Sb 8, 5 SF/ /8,57 SF J/ / 10,1635 �F I I O i i W o + +i+ + ,r + + +.4 -+-t /+ #J +/i 4/+'/ t + ♦ \ / +/+ + A/ +/// 8, �4SF , / / / / / I I + + + + cA + -+ �r + +' 4 /+ /+/ /+i /+/ + ++}+++ + + b + + + ♦ ♦ +i+�\\ \+\\� } 4/* /�+'I� A 4 //! +++++t It \ I ''" 9,621�E- 8,540�b-' '8,127,Sf /� ,' /' , /' ,/ / / / ^ I I I 1 I 4 + + /+ / l jo \ W + 1% +i r/ /+/ */'+/+ + _+_t + 4 + + + v \ ♦ 1 /+l4 # +\\\� / /}/ I#I� + +,ii + +-+\ Iii +JT4,,!— � * '+ + +¢�+ + / I \\ / / / /,/ // // / I +I� o ++++1++(}+/+j+ / w \ +++i%' #fes ±*�i//��A/+++'s---r-r-� + +#+\ +++++ +I ++ t�+ ♦y +/±\�\\\ i/j++firllN} J~II/* +i++/+�+ + +\ 1i1+IST} + +���+ + ±_+ // I \\ - B - o�� / / /+moi+ + ���� �+ I + + I + + +l+ +l / I /1 / i'+ + r'+ + /j */+ +�-�� *-F - _ t + +\ + + + (�+ + ♦\+ + \\ �/j/ filtlit4ji\+ fi i +//fi�/+ +��+j+/+Ittl�t + + �r + -t \� + +i� +-� + l� I -_ _ '' / _ sem+ ! / +' \+ t +\ + \+ +\+t+ +\+ ++( \+ + F + +� + x + + _ + +�� +' \ I+ + + + + + + + +\ + y' +, +i� �/+ }-+ �`t + + + + + \ , }I + + +/ + / +'+ + + + + / / / yam+ �/ + + + r + + + + �- fi + + +-+ + + + + + + a +� + %�+,+ ,+//+++\ v_ a-+-+ t + \+ r +-� + r \ + + + ♦ ♦ ♦\ �� / + / y/+/+ + \+I l+ll+l + \+tel + + + + +"+ f 4i++++ + Ir /+/ I + i + �+ �+ + �+ + + + i + + + +\+ + + + +I + + + + + + \+ # +I + 1+++ 1 }\ + I +//+ i+ \+ I I \ * +� +#+4+/ +% +t +I + �+ +//+,/' \+ + a��+±+� ��++-+-+ + +\\ \ \\ ♦ l%� + +/ +/+/+\+\ +\\ ♦+ + + j f' t \ + l++ + I + +j+ + +. + F 1 + + s + + + I+ +,'+ I+ + + /+ +�+ ++}i\+ + + +I l+ �+ + + } + + +� +K*} + + + + , tf / + + + + + + I+ + + + # +/ + + F + + + # } \ +1 I + + + // + + + (+ + +/ / t l I O \ Jr + + + + +s �r \t-� + + /+j p \ + + + +\ +\ + 4 + /+ +¢+ /+++ + } / % /+/ �/ +/ \ ++++I+++++++++++ + + �.s + + + + + t + + + + + + + / / / + +/ + \+ + + /+ /+ I , + + + /+ + + I I W --- + + + +/ + +/+1 +\ +\ +1+ \+ +\t + + ice'+ + \r%� +_+--+ �y+�+\ +`�+�+++++++ + y♦♦ ♦` ♦ �� \t y +/ / �t+1I� \ +\/ \+ +\+h¢� F/� 1 7 + + /+,+l + + \ +\ +\ + 1r q +\f_ +_+rr � �, -+ + +--��\��\�\ \\ \\ t' +/ +j/+ / /+/} + I�11�11t#+ + } / +\ + + /+ /+ ' // /% +/�/+ + + +\ + + +-f + + + + + + + + + 4 + /` + + + � + + + +J + + +/+ + +\ +/+ 1 +f\ ++++� + fi t \+��` + +I + + h }I \ \ Z Z V + + + + + s f-+ + + \+\ fi+\�+� \+\ + + +, + + i �♦ i + t /+ 4 +/ + I+ Ilrll* + `_#� �+ + / r + + +J+/+ + / /+ \+\ + +\ + + j i'i-�-}-+-+--r'+ �r-+_tom + - - t + _ r + + + + + + + + r / \ I _ r + + + + + ` H w _�----------' 1 ( 1 1 I • �_� \\\` `- I I l \ I\ �- _�/// ,' . \ O\ � ��^� / / / , / III \�� \ \---__ -\ \� I \ I �-���`__-_'/ / III II I I \ i/ / / � \ - / \ \ \ \ __/ / / / / / / --- � �� I / // /' �' __� i p � / / / / � / / I I /\ 1 I I /\ J SHEET NUMBER: //,/ \\ \��\-_-\�\• \ � 111\�\\\\\ �__�� ii'�__-���� \\'� D l � �/ / / l: (\ 1\_--� ��`_-- - _-��� � I\ l \ ����___�/''\ III//I I \\\ // / _ �\\\ _�'/ / ' \ 1 1\ \\ \ \ \ / / �� / f ( 00 D� \ �} \ \ __-__- \ -_/ -��\ \ \ \ \ \ -��\ \ 1 I I 1 1 \\`�_ \ _-\ . 1 'lJ \° C \ \ \ \.+_� �-�,\� ��--��\\� \ \ \ �\ \ \ \` \�\\ l\I \I \ / / / /� \ \-'VTNhJuu\Il l I I 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \`_--/ / / / / / / / / /' `\\ �\ \\\` /� / / /I �� , , // / I / 1 I I , III I I I /l 1 • :ivil-Survey\Plats\200194-PP.dwg PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS IMPACTED QUANTITIES: APPLICANT 1: G. JOSEPH CLARK 221 E. BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW JOHN BEASLEY 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 DEVELOPMENTPLANCRITICAL SLOPES STEEP SLOPES APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE HICKORY TRAIL LOCATION AREA (SF) LOCATION AREA (SF) ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 10 6,175 ® 5,036 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 IOWA CITY, IOWA 0 4,186 11418 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 30 6,268 1,885 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM ® 5,464 972 �T / 50 7,131 2,940 6 4,559 3 6,318 ----- U (JI N. NOTES: 70 2,526 ® 171472co N ® 917 �5 40,906 ___________ J- -� \\_-\ =`\ �'��\ 11 \� 1. THERE ARE PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. A BUFFER _ _ ______ y \ � _ \ \ \ EQUAL TO 2 TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE IS PROVIDED. NO PROTECTED SLOPES OR O 1,774 © 1,058 _- ____-- T_ ` \ \\ \ = ____ , \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ r \11 \� \ \ \ \ \ \ `\\\ II \ \\1\\ BUFFERS ARE IMPACTED WITH THIS PROJECT. --- G _---___ _ ` \\ \ �0 280 �7 6,948 ''__--'- ^ - _-- \\\\\ \\\ \\ I �\ ! \\ II \\ \�\`\\\ o 2. THE TOTAL PERCENTAGE IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE IS LESS THAN 35% OF THE TOTAL. _---_____- / __ ___________\\ 0 \\\ \) \ O 40 ® 21125 --__ I ^ --- ---- ----- -�` \ \\ \N� CRITICAL SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (SF) PERCENTAGE - i r,3591260 IN IMPACTED SLOPES 61,279 19%N. ` f6,713 5,737 nQRUST, NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 216,414 67% 2,488 1,820 if INON-IMPACTED SLOPES IN PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER 44,026 14/ ----- 4,143 II 1 \\I \ I 3,904-- ---- > + CRITICAL SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 321,719 100% + + ++ �_ + + . y y + + + + / + I+ *� /+ �6 1,933 6,351 * /' �7 5,422 ® 5,063 + _-- - `_ X66 ,,'/ //' /' ,' / �' ;/ /` ; ', ', I 3. STEEP SLOPE CALCULATION AREA (SF) PERCENTAGE , CD +/- IMPACTED SLOPES 145 153 44% 3,910 ' ,'' + '' -- ------ '62'x/ //'� /'/ /'//' / /' i NON -IMPACTED SLOPES 180,810 56% TOTAL 61,279 © 111426 0 ' / / / , l I i' i i iii il' - ' / / / / / ,' ,' / / / / l / / 1 I I / 1 I 1 I I 1 / / / STEEP SLOPES (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 325,963 100% 7 8,183 , ___� I I 1 \\,I 8 252 ' f ' \ __`I III \ , / 1 i \\' \ \a •\ 3,070 / ; /: 19 �/ / / \\ --- 21r ' 20 \\ \ '/c\ �\ \\ \\\ \" I� II I/ }\,\ \c\Q17 ----_/ // �� ',I' /' /// , ( /' /+ \\\1111 _ '\\ \✓��/'Ir-\\- \\\\\\ \\ I j I I \ \\,\ \ - �-�_�' ��'I' / / i' ' ,/ , ✓I / /f TOTAL 145,153 r \\\ // \\II 11 // IIl1'1 1 II II I I T\\t \ \I, j1, f II 1 i I I II i \y I _ 13 '\\\-, \\ \ - / /II,\\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \� ` \\\\ I I I \ \ \ / , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ 1 \ I 1 I 1 I I I \ \ \ \ - 1 \ _ \_ f/ I \ \ \ \\�\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\\ \\ \ \\ - I j 1j I I \ \\\ \\ \i/ \ \ 1 1 / \` J/ J 1 15 \ \ \ \�\ \ ( \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ 1 \ \ 1 II 1 1 22 ; 1 l\ \/\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ 408 \ \ \ ,54�F \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\23 Ti \\\ \ \ \ i 1 1 / 1 I = \ \ \ 1 1 \\ �\ I \\ \\ I\ I I 1 1 \_'��-_1� � \ ��� \ \ `�\3836§ ;--- \I 1 1111\\ \\\ \ \ I \ \ \1611 11 + \ 1111 / 1 \ \ ♦ _ _ \ \ \\ \/' -_ , 17\ \\ \ I 1 I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ ��-----'- -'�' /' / i N d 1N I I I ^ f \\ \ \ _ i \ _ -------- 1 I _ 10 10 l �,1 7/SF \�♦>\12 _ _---- _ r \ \ \` ------------- � i / l 1 � \ I / !� \ \-____�------__--- i' I / /, I // / o \r I 0 /\ N N Zo D rn m `- t70 � `U oz >< V° U 0 X Q L Lu Lu z ,3 <z w o N N W O O N N o N N -1 o N z Lu Lu p Q 0 0 U u LL J W z o a w z ¢ ° Z Z V Q a o 0 N ~ U Lj � 0 0 0 LuLu w ¢ m �\\ \\ \ \\\\\ \\ \ V 29154 SF ♦ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ _\\\\\_� / // / I\ \\ \ --- _ \ \ \\ \ \ , I o 1 I \ /---------- \ \ / / / / - �\ I + 1 L \` --------- '--------- ------ \\ \ \ \ I / // / / \ \\ \ \ ' 1 \ I 1 \ �_�/ \\ `� -_i ,i / / �� �1/�11 ,I \ ,---- ------------------/-II _ i� + i \\ \\ \\ / // / //� /----------- // / // i�\� \\`meq ! \ _ -------- ------ ---_L- - // t i / / I 1 1 \ \ / - SII - - / __ - SII + W \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / /, / / / / / ///i / I I 1 / I \\ \ \-%20-_ //��� � -� � / �' � � � SII �¢ / y ---- -- -- -,� - - / / 26 --- _\�' / z ! \\ \ \ \\ 1 'I % 33 \'�/ I/ ,✓ I/1 \ 1 \ \ I I \� �------- ���1 �---_ ------ '." � _.�'- wx Q i / - / ! \ \- /' \ \ \ 3 \ \ I I / I F /45 1 \ \ \ \\ \ ♦ ' \/ -\ / / / \ // ^\ 1 ) / / / % / % J \ L // _ `\ \ \ /i'/ �'--�� \ \\ \ \ ' / 180'39 SF \\I \\: _ \ ��- _\ 0� W I SFiA871,S Ftx''� /j > ♦ ♦\ //'\ -� \�---_' � ♦ / 1 I \ I 1/ /\_ \ t � � Q V \\� 1 J ' \ \ \ \ \ 1 V \ /' /�\ ' \ ' _ -- �\ \ ♦ / / \ �- \ I I * \ 0s ` \ Lu c,,' 1 \ \� \ �8,F49 -\\ �` \ 1 I X \%i' \\ ♦ /' /'/ \\ i \ + +� s /_ \� �/� � \ \ \\ \ \� \\ 8 � ♦ \ \ ♦ ♦ � ���___�' �_\ \\ \\ �\ \ ♦ / I I l♦ `' // - \N \_ "' � G � W Ln 0\ i \ A _ 32 - 11 \\\ --__ - \ \ \ \ \ ! ♦ \ \ I\ / \\ \♦ / / \ \,/ -- �\ \ 53$8 �F__ II \ ¢ ----� Q2. \ \\\ + �I \ \ P \ ' / \` \�--- �- _ \ \yam \ \-- z \\ 9 \ / _T +� 11 II \ �♦ \ \\ 1 / / \ ' ---' ♦ 1' /- -_ \ ----- I' \\� \ 30 05� SF \ O w \\ \ \ , / ti / _ \ 36 \ \ --< \ \ `\\\ 05 SF / \ \ �j+ / ,� ♦ ♦ \ ♦\ ` \ \\ ♦ I /� ♦ _'/ii730--- ` /A ! � ----- _ \ \\ ----- \ \ \`\` ■ _-_ a V LEGEND. ` , \ , _ , 1 SITE EXISTING PROPOSED / " / / \ - -<_ - : \ \ \ 9,207 SP, \ n y _ ' / / / \ \\\` r' \ ------ /* --- - ---'c- L f \ _�\\ \\18,880�F\_ �_� /__-`�� \ \ _ CONTOUR INDEX _100- 100 /,// //i // I %//// i \\\\\ \\___ - \ 1 \\ \ \-_/ __� \�`_ \ --- - �3,6825� �+ rel -\\ \ ♦ ♦ -' ♦ ` < ' -. - \ \���- \`� \� + \ \I 770__x__ +�\+ ♦ x + \ \ CONTOUR INTERMEDIATE 101 �-- \ x\ ♦\ --- \ I �\ _ * \ �\ \ \ __----- 0- \ \\ \ � 23,014 SF \ \>>, - \��\` ♦ // �� \ / r �\ \\ \ \ \ \ + \\ / t(, -q FENCE: BARB WIRE-x-x-x--x-x-x- / ,�! ) /„ _ 1 11 \_% -----Z---_ \ \ \ \ r- �-\ _ / �-------_ 7 \ \ �\ \ ♦♦ _ \ \ � � \ \\ \\ \\ \ \\ \ 1 I I / / / I III \ \ \ �� • STREAM CENTERLINE - - - - - - - - / / / �\ / / / \ 1 I I I _//-- f-------------�__ \ \ \ \ > > > x , \ x \ \ \ \ 1�9 ' / / �✓ \ / / / / O 1 I I - 60 \ 8� - 20,818 SF _ ♦ xN,15,470!\ \ \ \ ILu SIGN o o ' i' ,S ' / / // i �� i I 1 1 1 I I %' �\_-_ \ \ `\ ___-_ {G \ O\S / '' / / / / ♦ ` 1 \ -- '---- \ - ---___ \ \ \_ --/ * �\\ 29 - V ,� 44$SF \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ / \ I rJ / \ // \ /\ I / / / / / ♦ � 1 11 1 \ 1 ,��_-- �\-'--��-----� ��\ -\ \ \ \ \ \�� �\ �- \ 7 \ �23,8�65� \\\ \/\ \ \ Q I 2 \ \ / \ \ \ L \� 9,66'1 SF- 7 * _ �]/ 5U53Fc \ \\ \ / \ \ \ \ 2 Q + I l , Q CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS _ / / / /^; \ --- -�- fin\ \ \ -- / \ \\.7 28 1'�. `� \ r I f _ _ / / /\ \ \ - \�� \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4,51} SF / 1 -' ` //'O ♦ 7 111 / // \ �37)---- \ _� �\�� _ -� \ \ ✓ I / / \ �_ / // , „\�/ �♦ ♦ v �L. -- \/ /� /' -_ 38 \ \ -�- \ F \ 27,173 S�\ 2 X43 S� \ \ \ \ \ 1 I 1 / I \ \ \_ \ / \ \ \ \ \ \ I /+ 1 / l I W TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE \ \ /// ///�//\\ ♦ I I / / .\ _ \ \ ' I OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT - - 1 \ ` �S2 / / / / /, / // / / l \ ♦\ ♦ ♦� /___\\/ , // \ \ 1 O� " --- ---_ \\t 12,3225��`\ \ �- `\\ _ _ - - - \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ I I ) / /� \\\� \\ \\I\\ \ \`\ `♦♦♦\ `♦ ♦ \ \ ///'//�'\1 \1\11/ //" / ---- _ \l\0)\h SF _--- -� ---'\ \ \ \\ \\\ \_ �� \\ \ \\ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ \I 1� I I / /, /' I / K ¢ I ) l• 1 \ \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ ♦ ♦ > \ r, // l� \\\\\ '/ / f / �I/ 4 \ 9��17$F �� j��)\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ ♦ ♦-\ / - \ / / / \ \ \ _ \ \ 13,90 -7 -SF V \ SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER i / J / i / / \ \ .`\\ \` \`\ \ ` �♦ `' ' ` ' -- `" o \ ♦ _ \ / // \\ \ / / / \_ N. \ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ V _ 1/ / \\ ✓ / / //\ \ \ \ \ 1 \\\\\\ \\\\ �� \--------' ` \ \A\ \\ \\\�\\ \\ 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I / / 7� v T ,'/ // // / ,"` \ \\ \ I I / \ 1 \\ I \ \ \ \ \ ♦\ ♦ ♦ �` �-•\\�'' // //-__ \\ \\ // , / / /\ \ \ \ I \/ / � \ ` \ \\.� \ --- ---- 39 � � \ \ \ \ \ � 1 \ \ \ _ I i I 16 367 SF 1 I / b w o\�_ ' ♦ k \\\ \ \ I \ \ \ \ I I I I I C I I I % w STEEP SLOPE (18-25%) //,//'/// % / 1 ' \\ �// %,/ / / j / 1 \I \\ \\ ♦```♦�\ ` '_\ \ \ / / I I 1 \ \ / CO/ // / „\ \ \ \ \ / / / \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ ---' \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ > \ 1 ' -I 1 J I II I I I I C-qO I I , / W W O U \ \ I I /"/' / ' I �` --- i-- /' / / / ♦ ♦ ` - \ \ ` n l I I I 1 / / , / / /� \\ I 1 1 1 1 / / / / \ \ \ i \ \\ 9i375,$� �j \ ) / , I - / / l 1 1 I I I I I I I I I F I / I \ \ I /I (/7 a- a J IMPACTED STEEP SLOPE / / /, / / /'///// '/ // / / / / \ -c \\\ / \ \\ \ \\\/ / //� / \111111 / / --- \\\\\ \\ -- '' \\ 1 I ,/ /_ /-� / / / I I I I 1 Q 1 \ \ I / cS / / / i � / i / / / / / / / f ♦ ♦ \ \ / \ \ N.\ \_/ ' / / O / /\ I I 11 / / /, \ \ \ \\�' -----' / / � _ \ I , - �_ - T / , '1 % l 1 1 I k 1 s z W (18-25%) /, / / / i / / / / / \ \ ♦ ` \ / \ / J / / I I I \ \\ \\ \ ,�\ _ l \ \ � � / / 34. }r L.I 3 1 I P I I / \ I's \ > p C7 6� /l /r / /' /,�,//, �/, ii/ \\ // \`` �♦� -'/ // / I�y\\\ \'i" /� i''II111I II1•--- /// - \ \\\\ \\\ -- _ ' , // ` l I I 14,1169 F 1 1 I I I l J l \ ) I I / J n / , , . / / l I I I / / / / / / / \ / ♦ ♦ \\\ \ / / / -\\N\\ / / / III 111 ' /'- \ \ \\ \ \-- 0 1- ' �// \--- \ \� ' �SSF// 8,57 SF / / \ / / I II \ \ I / / / O 1 I I / / r rCRITICAL SLOPE(25-40%) / / / / /1 I - / / •\ \ \ \ \\ \ __ < - r / , / / \ 1fi3� 4 8 X00 Sb / 10,35 9F I I I 1 I / / CA /- _ �/ //J/�' // /''// i� �'' \ \ ♦♦♦\ ♦ ♦�; �' l l /'\\��\\/ // / iiij� 1111011 I I I I _ \--- r / _ ___ 7 $ ' / / / \ _ �/ 8, 0 F / I I / / Q \♦ / //t / _ 1 I I i ---- �� 8,127,SF /� / / / / I I I I I I I x I / / / '/ i// _------- \\\\ a\ ` L / / \\ \\ \ / / I II I I IIII , / / / /. ^- -\ I III -- \ �' / / _� --�) 1 \ 1 \ ' 9,621�E' 8,5405f- -yr / ' ,/ / ' ,' ' / ^ I I I I 1 I / l o I \ W IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE / - / / / /, / /--------- \ ♦ z / / / / I I _ / / / / I I/- \ . \ 1 / I + 1 / / b \ \\ / 6 / / / / / // / //------- \ \ \ ♦ / / \ \ \\ / / 1 I I I i I I I �: / /, \ 1 1 I 1 I -i_ \ ' '/� ' 1 1 J I 1 / �' _/ / l / I + 1 I I / ( %) ' I / // /' ��/,'// // _- -----� \-_� ` `\ \\ \ //\ \\\\\_y'i%'/i 11111 I / ��' / / 1111//J �''- \\_ ;--i/ / l 111 I J+�\ B _ o� 25 40% / O / / / // / /' \\ IIII \\-��\� \ I_ �6 '+ + +�- - / \ \l \\ ( ° + + + * + + �\ / / /' 1 �\ \\ 1 I 11 / \\ 1 // \) II PROTECTED SLOPE >40%) \ --- ) / \ \ 1 f �,\ \_ '�/---.� �- \\\\\\\\\\� \ \\ ` �\\\\\ \ ♦ ♦ /" /,'// / �\ \ \\111 I1 \\ / // /� \ \ \ /'/-_ \ j %/l//� / /� / I \ I ��1 \ I /,y / // /'��\/1 I % /'���//' ' ' / /// ' ''' / / z -`\ ( I l l\1� `\ \\ \\\--'-_----_- \� \ \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ ! J \ / / f / // 1 III \ \ / / / \ \ I / / , J , / / / ! / \ ( I l \ 1 , / / / ,' ,/ ) f / ( 1 , I \ \ \ Y �� I / 1 I I Z W z \ I // �! �/ /--\ \ - \ I 1 1 I / l I 1 1 I 1 \ \\ I \ \�1�\_�_ \��\\\ ^ / _ \ \ i / ♦ I I I I \ \\ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ �O // / ,/ _-------- '---- / /-- ,' i' - / / \ / / / / - ! - N O O \_' i / -� : / 1 / 1 I \ l �\ I \ \\� \ ��_ ' ' j j ' I I I \ �/ / �\ \\ i /,/ \I i 1 l \ \ \ \\ \ / rcJ _ \�--------'''/ / / i / - / -/ / O / // l \ 1 / / A l l 1 I \ \ \\\\��\\ / / 1 I \�' / \ / I / / 1 O I 1 1 N a � \ ` O� /\ 1 I I \ J SHEET NUMBER: \ 1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ �\ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 • 1 Feb 11, 2021 - 4:55pm S:\PROJECTS\2020\200194\05 Des ign\Civil-Su rvey\Plats\200194-PP.dwg NOTES: 1. 14 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA THERE ARE WOODED AREAS WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT. CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PRESERVING PORTIONS OF THE WOODED AREAS. PER IOWA CITY CODE FOR RS -5, A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE EXISTING WOODLANDS MUST BE PRESERVED. R5-5 WOODLAND PRESERVATION CALCULATION AREA (SF) PERCENTAGE DISTURBED WOODLAND 497,053 37% BUFFER (50' WIDE) 200,516 15% PRESERVED WOODLAND 627,495 48% WOODLAND (PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT) 1,325,064 100% THE DEVELOPMENT IS 2% SHORT OF THE REQUIRED 50% WOODLAND RETENTION THRESHOLD. REPLACEMENT TREES WILL BE PROVIDED TO OFFSET THIS DEFICIENCY. CITY CODE REQUIRES REPLACEMENT TREES AT A RATE OF 1 TREE PER 200 SF OF DISTURBED WOODLAND REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TREES = ( 1,325,064 * 0.02 )/ 200 = 132 TREES 3. STREET TREES AND OTHER TREES SHOWN COUNT TOWARD REPLACEMENT TREE NUMBER. I LEGEND: SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR - INDEX — 100 — 100 CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE — 101 — 100 FENCE: BARB WIRE-x-x-x--x-x-x- STREAM CENTERLINE — - - - — SIGN 0 0 CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE miimiimiim OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WOODLAND PRESERVATION ++++++++++ IMPACTED WOODLAND PROPOSED TREE REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN eb 11, 2021 - 4:52pm O i vil-Survey Plat -P� IMPACTED QUANTITIES: WOODLANDS LOCATION 0 0 0 0 0 4rms i. K 449 pp `il 44 AREA (SF) 130,177 125,227 36,847 2,135 40,474 5,892 147,025 %276 APPLICANT 1: G. JOSEPH CLARK 221 E. BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 APPLICANT 2: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 JACOB@ N ELSONCONSTRUCT.COM H�c,CRY HALL FRRK APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW JOHN BEASLEY 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM 01. O /\ N N Z rn JEll o(n ` o U Oz V° U 0 X Q L Lu Lu z 3 z w N z Lu Lu o Q o 0 J = u U u LLJ w z o a w zQ o z z V Q o O u Lu N ~ 0 N= Lu o Lu o N Lu Q m L/) () Lu Q z Q c a Q u 0 W Lu z W v1 Q LU Q ° Q w z a Q � Q w QJ cz_ G Q Q z u 0 w oc z LU N > o�c w Lu V) z v) z�w V V zQo z w u z T_ 0 a /� �L V I J V (I�, V C1.20 r -I 0 0 () Q W Q W z W v1 Q LU Q Q z Q � Q w QJ cz_ G o z z LU 0 w oc Lu N C1.20 r -I 0 0 PRELIMINARY OPD AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL IOWA CITY, IOWA LEGEND: I ' 1 SITE EXISTING PROPOSED CONTOUR - INDEX -100- 100 -CONTOUR I ` CONTOUR - INTERMEDIATE - 101 - 100 FENCE: BARB WIRE -x-x-x- -x-x-x- STREAM CENTERLINE - - - - - - - SIGN 0 0 CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS 510Y TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE =iimiimiim OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT - - SENSITIVE AREAS AREA BUFFER WETLAND PRESERVATION F-vL-1 0 0 0 0 BLUE LINE STREAM CORRIDOR ----- 1711 J Feb 11, 2021- 4:52p7 p j :ivil-Survey Plats 200194-PP.dwg _ \ S �I 2 38,362 SF I 3 ,849 SF APPLICANT 1: G. JOSEPH CLARK 221 E. BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 APPLICANT 1'S ATTORNEY: PHELAN TUCKER LAW JOHN BEASLEY 321 E. MARKET ST IOWA CITY, IA 52245 APPLICANT 2: APPLICANT 2'S ATTORNEY: NELSON DEVELOPMENT 1, LLC KIRTON MCCONKIE ATTN:JACOB WOLFGANG ATTN:BRYCE K. DALTON 218 6TH AVE., STE. 200 50 E. SOUTH TEMPLE, SUITE 400 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84111 JACOB@NELSONCONSTRUCT.COM BDALTON@KMCLAW.COM I' � PSE In � J "All IAII � 1<4%,, 4 + 184,197 SF , I \, 24,692 SF D + � D 29,154 SF DpD°D°D°D°D \ \ °pp°pDpD pD pD pD + \ DDDDDD°D°D°D°D°D° _ pJ°J°i°v°�D �► O / 1 I \ \ 6 / / pDp Dp Dp DpD DD DDDDDDDDD DD DD ° D°D°° D DDD D D D D D D D D D D p p p �° p D DDDD D 21,846 SF D ° ° D ° ° D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D� ° DDDD D DDDDDDD •-\• / / / DDDDDDDDDDDDDD°D°D°D°D°D°D °D DD DD DD DD DD DD DD pD pDpDDD� D -p D D°D°D / \-• � \ \� / ° ° D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p p� D D D D� p D°D°D°DDDDp D°D°Dp Dp Dp Dp Dp Dp Dppp D°D°D°D°p°p°pDpD pD pD pD pD°D°D°D D°� v 15� °pDp�Dp�Dp�pp�pp IDD°D°D°D DD DD DD DD DD DD DD pD DDpDppppD pD pDpDpDp Dp D°p°p°°°D°p°p°pDpD pD pD pD pD°D°D°D DD DD DDDDDDDDD DDp � / O / / % \ / /\, DDD DD DD DDDDDDDDDDDD p DDDD pDpD°DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD°D°D°D°DDDD DDD DD DD DD DD DD DpD Dp Dp D°pDp°p°p°°°°°p°pDp°pDpDpD°D°D°D°D°D° °D°D°D°D°D°D°DDDD \_- / °D°p°D°pDDDDDDDD DD DD DD DD DD DDDDDDDDD D°D°DD DD DDDDDDDDD DpD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD \ /45 \ / p°pDpDpDpDpD°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°p°p°p°pDpDpDpDpD°p°p°p°1�"°p°p°p DpDpDpD°D O D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D \ \ � D D D D D D D D D D p p D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DpD D D D DDD DD DD DD DDDD DD DD �D�Dp�D,/�y v / 2,271 SF \ \571 SF °D°D°D57b>w�� F°Co1RDDD'' O/ .-------- 18,249 SF \ OUTLOT A 473,268 SF % D 1D lf'\ °DDDDDD DpDD •\ �1S pDDDD° 100' p p D D D \ WETLAND BUFFERS°DD DDDD .>DDD D D°D°D°C �.' "DpDDDD D D D D D D DSD DDDD 'D°D°D°pDpDD°D°D pD D D D D D°p°p°p °p DD Dp DD DD DD DD DD C. D D D D D D D D D D D D D pD D D pD pDpDpD°D°D D°D°D °D DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DDDDpD. DDDD°DDDDDDDDDDDDD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D O�DDDDDD DD DD DD DD pD pDp D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°DDf >`> >`> Dp Dp D D D D DD DD DD DD DDp r ..'DDDDDDDDD DD DD DD DD DD DD D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°DDDDDD °°° D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p°°°°°°°° D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DpDpD°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DDD°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D DpD°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D° D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D °D°DDDDDDDDDDDDDD pD DDD DDDDDDDDDDDDDD°D°D°D°D°D°DDDD DDDDDDD DD DD DD DDD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p p p p DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD D D D D D D D D D D D D D D pDpDpDpD pD pD°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D D D°D°D°D°D°D°D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DpD°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p p D p p p p p p°° D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p p p pp°°D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D pDp Dp D l>'>'>'>>> D D ° DD °D °° ° D °pDpD D D D D D D D D D pDp DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DD DDDDDDDDD DD DDDDDDD DD D D° D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D p D D D r r D D D D D D D D D D D p p D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D DDDDDDDD°D°D°D°D°D°D°D -°D°D°D°D°D°D°D°p°p°p°pDDDD DD DD DD DDD�D� DD D D DDDDDDD D D D D D D MCKGRY �Mos j : oK449pp`il44 � 9 05 SF 0 \ 16,18 91.207 SF 12 13 18,886 SF - - 23,682 SF D D DDDDDDDDDDD DDDDDDDDD°f..pi. �..- D DpD DD DD DD DD D. DD DD Dp D=p TERRY FA I,� REVOCA:LF TRU 1 408,543 SF 30' STREAM BUFFER 14 23,014 SF 15 20,818 SF 16 ��,,.%'' \ 20 - \ \ 9,661 SF 1 �" / 18 19 27,505 SF 2 44 -- -- _ 12,329 SF 43 \ \ \ \ F 27,173 SF 28,143 SF - - - 10,612 SF 42 9,617 SF 41 ,. \ 9,907 SF HO0BY H&L PARK I I I I I I I II II 1 11 1 I I I I OOH / 5 � + + I •, I ' 1 , I x + I , + I ` 15,388 SF I I + � I I 10,055 SF I + II 1 + 11 1 �I I I I "°°$ 14,962 SF I //I I / 510Y W0 "' 10,822 SF PEI � 23 p� < a 100Y 28 N Q W r'g' bl TOU OT-fo 18 ,396 W' +°0r / X x BUFFER T°S x 1 22 448 SF 23,866 SF 9,375 SF \\ --- --- --- 39- - - - 35 34 33 32 16 SF 3 8 3 7 3 6 8,204 SF 8,200 SF 8,505 SF 8,575 SF 9,621 SF 8,540 SF 8,127 SF + O N Z O) J r-1 m o(n o ` U Oz V° U 0 x a Lu Z z Lu 0 50 100 x 25 + x 15,388 SF I I 126 � I I 10,055 SF 0 � cif O I 24� I "°°$ 14,962 SF I V) I / 27 W0 "' 10,822 SF PEI � 23 p� < a 15,470 SF / 28 N Q W 14,514 SF ci O W m J N 29 a 16,365 SF b _ ,x paC 30 Q I 31 I- 0 14,169 SF 10,935 SF z / + = + + + - + O N Z O) J r-1 m o(n o ` U Oz V° U 0 x a Lu Z z Lu 0 50 100 Ln H N z W Lu o Q 0 o U v J z o a w z a LD (D z V a a p O IJP U c 0 0 0 Lu Lu Q L i Ill O z Lu < N 0 � cif O W O O V) Q CL W0 "' Q pw[ LL u z Ill L p� < V) C) a 0 N N Q W J ci O W m Ln H N z W Lu o Q 0 o U v J z o a w z a LD (D z V a a p O IJP U c 0 0 0 Lu Lu Q L i Ill cif z Lu < DC a W 0 � cif O z co < V) Q CL W0 "' z aLu pw[ LL u z Ill L p� < V) C) a W CL 0-) Q W J o r1 z w O O Q W m J N Lu a paC Q Q U I- z LU > �_ w O w N a J Cn o V U wzQZ w w/� z , T� 0 i 0- L J J V L/) cif Lu 0 DC a W 0 � cif O z V) �V_ W0 "' z aLu pw[ LL u z Ill L p� < V) C) a W J 0-) Q W J o r1 z w O O _ W m 0 N C1.30 CONCEPT PLAN HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES - - - - - - - - - - IOWA CITY, IOWA -- - --- +____ / �_-{ .__UPDATED FEBRUARY 11, 2021 \, N N \ {i ----------- 0 41 \\ \ \ \ X cp Lu Lu \\�-----------` ---- } fy� - \ \ //\ - Q � V A V A V A I I w -ao�I -_ ------ ----__ \ \ \___--_------_ ------------------- \ \\\ • �\ \ ,,� ,_ _ \ \\ \ r / \N. 1ST AVEN U E'1 -v A 1 I ► I I I I I 111 � I I V I I I I _..-: -.. _\ _ \ ___ S01°J15'14 "E 8 ' '� o so 100 \\\\\\\\\\\\ �\ // \\ \\ - .. /•-- - --------------__-_-- ^- -- - \` ------ ' / / /731 �C� C�L1J EVtK�"-c!r AAA V AVAA V A / / -�v--------- 0vv_ /--_ _ _ - r _-__-- \------- VAA\vvv v vvv �/ % _ _ -v V I I I v o q P vVAAVA\vvA v / / A / / HICKORY TRAIL 1\ \ \ \; \ w Pwiston Creek r �tkf`I'I I I 1 \ \\� \ \\ / I I I ► _ _ \ „___ _ \ \\ \ W((��9 ��wp� \ \I I i I _ 'I OOD I \ � AA v / � I r._- __- ♦ v v v A / v A v v _ v `l�J °" A AV 1 / / � / � / / / / l l I I I t'+ � I ) I / / H A \ V - vv v vv \v / I ► / / / 1 /v / / / / PROJECT VICINITY MAP � \`\\� \\\\\\ \ ,' �\ I I 1 I I , , I 1 1 /-,; �\\,;; ', //, \\\\\� ,I \ _ --_-_, � \\\ '\,, �� , \\ \\ \\ -__ I I ► / I I , , -- -- ' ,, _ - I I I , I\\,, I I I _ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ I ..\ 1 1 1 1 1 , I I I I \ � _ / //^�\ \\\\\\\----\ / �' \ \ - \\\\ \\ `\ \\ -\•--/ / l I I I / I / //' / W �_ ���-1 \\\\ 1 1 ' \ I' 1 I I III I I I \\\�\\ - �\\ \\\\\\\\�\\\\__ / / / -\ \ \\\ \- �--___ \ \ \\\\ \\ \\-_- `----' // / I I, II I I '/ / \ / �. \ + / ✓ / l\ 1 \ \ \---_--------// I I I I I I I I 1 I \ \ \ �\ \ I \ \ \ � \ I \ \\ �r 1n� U \ \1\ \\ \ \ LL - _ / \ \ \ \\ V - \\ \III \ 11\ \✓ 1 -I I I I I II I i \\ \ \\ \ \ \ - \ \\\\\\\\\\\ _ ////' /' -\\\\ \� - _- \ /----\\\ \\ \ \\ \\----------' / / \ 1 I I I \ Q 1 \ \ / // I \ ♦\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ z O ► \- I I J I I I 1 I \ \ \ \ \\\ �\ \\ \ \-- // /iv \ \ ----\ \\ / / �� \\ \\\ \\ - --/ J I 1 / \ \ \ - / / �/ \ \ \ \ � \ — Z -- ---- __/ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 \ 1 \ I I 1 1 I \ \\ \ \ \-_--_ � _ ___- vv vv vv v\v\ vv l V A A� 3`8,36- /) / 1 1 I A V Av - - �= -vv� - vv/// / VA �VAAl1 1 A 1 1 1 v _ -i// - / /-/�� / ) V \ �� v v� v A A I \ ww � _ \ \\ \ \ \• / \\I_-_ ) / / / ///(/ /, / \-- ,'� �\\\ � __ - _ _ \ \\\_ __/ \IIII VIII II l / /IIS/\\�\ \_--- /// \III //l /^ j / �' ' \ \ \ \ I \ \ ' / I I1 I ► \ \� f I � --�\\ \ _--- - � -- \ /VIII - \\\All \\\ \\\ \\ \_-/ / /IIII / \\\\\\\ \ \✓ j/// ��`__ - i / /' \ \ \ \ \ \ - _ \ \ \ -_ \ \\ \ \\ \ --// / 1111 /-\ \� \ -\\ \ / / \ I \ \ // w // \,/\29,154SF \� A EST} 1 b�l��� \D \ \ \\ \ _ -\\\ \ \` / / // N/ \\\\ \_-- \ \ _-- _ - - OAK K�OL/L/ / / vv v v A \\ \ �/� �\ \ A �"r�p nl ) ApW�b �)o�o�o� //v-------- --. /' I C/1 Vy Ip pq, ' ' \ \ D��`D D Db DPD �D ENTRANGE / / // / / // V 1 1 �L 1 v v V l\ � J / / / / � I d � � d ��� � � -' - _ v � / j _ -__ �-' �// _ � II v ---._._- _-- - - - _ - +� ✓I �l , //�'`/ / �lJ o d o e v O \ \ V A V A A oPp\D��pW > I> �D�NA P�W�> Dz > a c� i A Ef ' / � / / / — I I I \ \ \ \ 1 I \ �\\ \ I � oDODIy d /o9'9 0 .p P�n'��a-•+���i�,epp��\\�A 7D,D,>D�pDp / \ / /' / I/ \ I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ / `__—_—_\ \ \ I eD D Dlf✓D�DD�D�D� %��D �� D D D� W� Q D D D D D D D p_p % 1 -- '\ \ \00 / /\ � � I I I I 1 \ \ \ \ \ _- \ \\ / /J , / +W c-_ / / / \ eD DDDD�-e�D$D���� \p4 ol�bd�d� DDb DDDD ��/��DSDDD✓Z D�D\D D D�D���P-� � -R D p \ \ � _ Lu ppD.. D D �I F•.2 D D — D'P \ -tr —D \ \ _ S �b �-0 �'A D U p p o DeD D D \ \ \ D�P�_G�/���pDAD D�isDD�i'D f�A�\��q� /D�D��DQyD�q�'9D� \ \.L�iJC,I�I N1\ I //�10111396SF \\ o / - _' � / / � \ \ \I I I I � 1 \ \ , \ \ \ \ I /// /////j�/ /_— / � \\\////�///\ " 1 L� /��� ► b �DD��D�D�/�6 �p �o-p�o� � DpD D��Rb`Cd�/o �/D�.4p�>��d�na�� C\ J \ \\ \ \ \ �S ry J�IVJ>g-0� x \ Lu I \ W — \\�� �� � Ix J / v A - v _v ♦ / / / v - -- \////I— \ SF `--\ W Z ��A !r A V vv v v / vv N / v A A A I �� i� /' v v ► i/ ^vv __ //' /v /�, // -- A v v Lu I l I V v v _- 1 \ Vv� 1 \-/_ r. v A VA VAvim/� v v-✓ / ---- ///// _ _-- -- - v �-1 _ _� nn�� — �w z Z Ln 0 23,682 Sr \ W w � V 0 8 SF's. Z_ 60 v'v (i-7-S� � V\ vv 1_' v 1 I � I I I ► I / / // / S A�\ \ 116 3 SF 1 I �'//,// /// I > I, .♦ Av vv v v v v vA v --- --'.- v v v vv v �� I v> � 50' 1 27 i 3� / l �— I I I I ./ , I I o I I I 3/ I I I I I \ 1 to \ Ln 1 I a\ \ \ \ \ \ \ I ,57 SF / 1 i / a PROJECT DATA: . - 8 0•SF o MM- 8_540 $F / // / / / , b// w � v 6�� 72' S` �/ / 69' v I / 0 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 48.75 ACRES \ \ _ - _ _ _ _ ,'' �� -- , �V YV i / o J PARK DEDICATION AREA 10.86 ACRES- - \ --- \ v la ao z Lu (D \ \ \ \ I \ \\ \ \ \ w CL �67I -�) I__ NOV - / / � F -i 1' t - - \ \\\ �/ // II►I II ` / \ 0 /� / \ �/� �� \ \ \ o / / / I i - / IV01 ��+i / D�( V / / ( I I I— ' / -V A \ I 1 l �/ / y! - v � / / - \ \ / S Lu \ O 1 �, l ' _ _ �� /------- \ .��`— _ ' __ VJ-�J/ / // / / ^ /c\ I i ,\O / LEGEND: I l h_ \__ \\\_ =1 \ \ \ \. \ \ . `_ \_�/ „1 Q _ \ - ' • - _ \ \ \ \\ I I I / /'\ \ \ �� I\_ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ - // 7 Lu UZ \\\\ \\ \ / l \ \ \ / ` I / II/ /i QL F O _\ \ \ \ \ \ - / / \ �: \ _ / \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ _ \ \\ \\ ) \ �• \ \ \„\ \ \\ \\ST / / 1 1 CJ PARK DEDICATION I -----� �\ ���� \ \ �, ; - \ _ \ \ - \ \ \ \ \ \ / , __— LU O w O _ �,I,, \ - \, \ 4 4 \ - ► I\ \ \\ \ \ / /' / I I l \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ J // / / \\ \ \ \\ / / / / I r TRAILS / /I /l I / / /o / / I I III( = /Y \ \ \ \ � 1 \ \\ \ � 1 \ \ \ \ / / / � \ \ \ \ // / ' - // / I / / / / III � /c/ / \--_ \\\\\ \ \ \\ \\ / I l \ \ \ \\\\ \ \ \ \\ ��-' i l l l // \ \ �� ' I \\ ' _ /--/- I � NEENUMBER:� N \ -, \� - \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\\ \ -- \\` \ 1 \ I \ I \\< // \ \ \ \ -� // / / / / / / / / ' - •\ \ \ \\ \\\ / -`\�/ /' / , / ► I / / it SHEET CONSERVATION EASEMENT ��������I��I� / __-'\\ , \ \ _ -- \ \ \ 1 \\ \ \ \ \ / / /' \\ \ \ /� ► I \ \ ( 1 1 I , / 02.00 I Feb 11, 2021 - 2:36pm vil-Survey Plats 200194-PP.dwg o� < -- 1 / X770— - / / \772— UNIT 4 It UNIT 3 \ STYLE "A"I STYLE "B" // I LOT AREA LOT AREA / ; UNIT 2 12,435 SF ;� 10,355 SF STYLE "A" LOT AREA UNIT 1 8,352 SF /� STYLE "A�� i _ _ UNITS �� � ��. LOT AREA / 10,992 SF STYLE ..B.. / � LOT AREA�5' 3 / 11,421 SF SS 6 60,�� 25,J I \ �` UNIT 6 � STYLE B•• Q 0)LOT AREA �� W 26' / 8,539 SF I\� --784— — 176 W \ I UNIT 7 I\/ w�� Feb 11, 2021 - 4:47pm U STLoLAREAIt:A^� �P I — _ — —fig 8,751 SF sic. UNIT v1� 4 STYLE ..B.. co LOT AREA 9,513 SF 5 � I II II UNIT N ET�A" �I �� o II I O LOT AREA / ti / — I / 14,705 SF Y UNIT 10 7 STYLE "B" 6'�/ // 14,811 SF�IV lbou � 62 00 rN vil-Survey Sheets Condos 200194 - Condo.dwg SITE INFORMATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 45 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES (PLAT PENDING APPROVAL) TOTAL LOT AREA: 152,271 SF (3.50 AC) PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT DETACHED, SINGLE-FAMILY CONDOMINIUM 10 UNITS - 2,863 SF FOOTPRINT (EACH) ZONING INFORMATION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE - LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (OPD/RS-5) SETBACKS AND YARDS FRONT YARD 15 FEET SIDE YARD 5 FEET REAR YARD 20 FEET N. SCOTT BLVD 40 FEET MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS MIN. LOT AREA 8,000 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH 60 FEET MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET MAX. LOT COVERAGE 45 FLOOD ELEVATION N/A BUILDING INFORMATION 26' 13' 13' 12' 5' 7" PCC PAVEMENT 2.50% 2.50% 1.50% 74/1"C SIDEWALK 6"SUBBASE z Lu o al a 6" SUBDRAIN TYPICAL 26' PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION NOT TO SCALE O /\ N N lD z Jl D `- o(n AZO Ou > z V° U O X Q w Lu z z z w 1141=21 EXTERIOR FINISHES: ROOFING: CERTAINTEED LANDMARK WEATHERED WOOD SINGLES MASONRY: ELDORADO STONE - MONTICETO CLIFFSTON WINDOWS: ANDERSON 200 -SERIES SIDING: DIAMOND KOTE LP SMART SIDE COLOR OPTION 1 O O SIDING FRENCH GRAY (LP SMART SIDE) N SOFFIT & FASCIA WHITE (ROLEX) TRIM WHITE (DIAMOND KOTE) W GARAGE DOORS WHITE o FRONT DOOR SW ROYCROFT COPPER RED (SW#2839) COLOR OPTION 2 c1 SIDING FRENCH GRAY (LP SMART SIDE) SOFFIT & FASCIA CLAY (ROLEX) Lu TRIM CLAY (DIAMOND KOTE) z GARAGE DOORS SANDSTONE FRONT DOOR SW ROYCROFT BRONZE GREEN (SW#2846) COLOR OPTION 3 Q U SIDING CLAY (LP SMART SIDE) wo SOFFIT & FASCIA WHITE (ROLEX) Lu V O TRIM CLAY (DIAMOND KOTE) GARAGE DOORS SANDSTONE U FRONT DOOR SW ROYCROFT PEWTER (SW#2848) N o�c N 26' 13' 13' 12' 5' 7" PCC PAVEMENT 2.50% 2.50% 1.50% 74/1"C SIDEWALK 6"SUBBASE z Lu o al a 6" SUBDRAIN TYPICAL 26' PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION NOT TO SCALE O /\ N N lD z Jl D `- o(n AZO Ou > z V° U O X Q w Lu z z z w 1141=21 H Nz Lu w 0 Q o 0 J m~ u U u L.Lu L J W z o a w z Q Z V Q m 0 0 U 0 0 0 LuLu Lu L/) Lu O -1 Q N N w O O ° J N N a W o J N c1 O H Nz Lu w 0 Q o 0 J m~ u U u L.Lu L J W z o a w z Q Z V Q m 0 0 U 0 0 0 LuLu Lu L/) Lu z Q c a ° J 0 c~ W Lu J N Q Lu a z o C Q Q U Q zz�zZzo wo Lr)O I- C) O Lu V O z Lu Lu J U > ° N o�c N w d Lu V) z � v) QO zVz V w z w w z , 0 = m '' ^^ V / w V C2.10 w ° J QCL W J N z o Q zz�zZzo wo Lr)O I- C) O Lu V O o w rn rl o Lu J U U ° N N d C2.10 oQ ° o°°� o \ / I I \ I �o i °� i %0'�� 1 I \� \I ° IIS+I- �� 10 + I+ + r \ \ \\ II I 751, + �� A o I'�II�II�II IIS + �+-� +�--� $� °° °°°A°� 4/00 °V°�°° ° ° ° 9 _° lei°°I°°� o °�°° °° N7 X7,71 ,�� / / K�)RI � I \ \ \ I + °°°°° �°d°°r17 ° °°°°° °�°/° / / / // / / � --- 12' _- ���%2!6'/) I , I 77 \ I I ° ° ° o° ° °% /° � ° % ° ° ° ° ° ° % l° 9 ° / / �° ' I l \ R75' V — ° T°°/ °°°° °l ° °�°°o°� l+// 1 1 — 20 ' �� ��.5�' �> I + I I °o °°/ °° G °% ° R I (° °° ° 0 4 \ __ --- — ��/// // / / / // I+ —.93'— ll+ 20 i 26 71 / / I A 15.65' \+ /R 15' i� R2Lu 0' �� / / °� v \ + 00 16 / — — ° —0 ; z + N R15' i R25' _-- \ \ \ \ o \ o 24' \ 1 \\ \\ \ \ ° o- 760- 12 \'' — 1 1 1 1 \ �\ +\ %i + R1 0' I 1 I \ \ 1 9 i RIO' \ I I I I fR66' R40' I 1 I \ — — — I \ \\ \ — —750, I I \ 26' — \ \19' 26� 1�' i \\ A 7-1 I I I \ \ — _ I \ + 200' -740_ oil + 10' \ v -_-- \ \ 26 N11 \ i 1 A I� Feb 11, 2021 - 4:35pm Design Civil -Survey She zzzzz - Senior - Site Plan.dwg H KORY TRAIL SITE INFORMATION lig—� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: w LOT 1 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES (PLAT PENDING APPROVAL) W TOTAL LOT AREA: 408,543 SF (9.38 AC) -1 PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT ( , J W SENIOR LIVING FACILITY N ASSISTED LIVING 2 N Lu 1 GUEST SUITE 1 BED W 74 ONE BEDROOM 74 BEDS Design Civil -Survey She zzzzz - Senior - Site Plan.dwg H KORY TRAIL SITE INFORMATION KEYNOTES: ORETAINING WALL 0 /\ N N Z rn m 0(n2 `U Oz >< V° U 0 x L Lu Lu z 3 < z w 1141=21 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: w LOT 1 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES (PLAT PENDING APPROVAL) W TOTAL LOT AREA: 408,543 SF (9.38 AC) -1 PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT ( , J W SENIOR LIVING FACILITY N ASSISTED LIVING 2 N Lu 1 GUEST SUITE 1 BED W 74 ONE BEDROOM 74 BEDS O 14 TWO BEDROOMS 28 BEDS TOTAL 135 BEDS N MEMORY CARE 32 BEDS GROSS BUILDING FOOTPRINT 69,060 SF Q ZONING INFORMATION z PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE - LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (OPD/RS-5) 0 SETBACKS AND YARDS (MULTI -FAMILY) ti FRONT YARD 20 FEET w SIDE YARD 10 FEET REAR YARD 20 FEET 0 HEIGHT 40 FEET REQUESTING VARIANCE FOR HEIGHT GREATER THAN 35' MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS J MIN. LOT AREA 8,000 SF W MIN. LOT WIDTH 60 FEET MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET C2.20 MAX LOT COVERAGE 45 MAX. SETBACK COVERAGE 50 paC BUILDING WIDTH ALONG FRONTAGE 212.33 FEET < a LOT FRONTAGE WIDTH 668 FEET U SETBACK COVERAGE 32 a LOT COVERAGE 69,060 / 408,543 = 17 FLOOD ELEVATION N/A Lu PARKING CALCULATIONS: USE REQUIREMENT # OF STALLS MEMORY CARE 1 STALL PER 3 BEDS 32 BEDS 11 ASSISTED LIVING 1 STALL PER 3 BEDS 103 BEDS 34 STAFF 1 STALL PER EMPLOYEE 40 EMPLOYEES* 40 TOTAL REQUIRED = 85 * NUMBER OF PERSONS EMPLOYED AT THE FACILITY PARKING PROVIDED = 86 ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED = 4 TOTAL PROVIDED = 90 QO KEYNOTES: ORETAINING WALL 0 /\ N N Z rn m 0(n2 `U Oz >< V° U 0 x L Lu Lu z 3 < z w 1141=21 Nz Lu Lu O Q c J = U u Li-- w z o d w z Q o z V a ~ o O N U L 0 0 0 LuLu Lu Q cn w W O -1 w O ( , J W Q N N 2 N Lu W O O N N Q� Q r z o z 0 0 ti N w � c1 0 ° N Nz Lu Lu O Q c J = U u Li-- w z o d w z Q o z V a ~ o O N U L 0 0 0 LuLu Lu Q cn w W z w O ( , J W Q Z a J 2 N Lu c a J IZ W Q� a Q� O z� z z o z 0 W a- O w � 0 Q ° N J SHEET NUMBER: W C2.20 paC < a U a z Lu > o�c w Lu V) Q J v)z� QO V U W z z w W z , a v, V w w O ( , J W Z a J 2 N Lu J IZ W Q� a Q� O z� z z o z 0 z w w O O w o = J cn Ln U ° N SHEET NUMBER: C2.20 Feb 10, 2021 - 1:29pm LANDSCAPE LI PLANTS: PROPOSI -SPECIE AND SIG[ vil-Survey Sheets Subdivision 200194 - L Sheets LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE ID QTY. BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME ROOT SPACING LU Betula alleghaniensis Q 30' TYP./AS BAY 2 YELLOW BIRCH BB SHOWN " c Betula nigra 30' TYP./AS BNR 2 RIVER BIRCH BB SHOWN V)Cn Betula platyphylla 'Fargo' DAKOTA PINNACLE 30' TYP./AS BPF 2 DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH BB SHOWN i ° Betula papyrifera 30' TYP./AS BPP 1 PAPER BIRCH BB SHOWN Carpinus betulus'Fastigiata' 30' TYP./AS CBF 3 COMMON HORNBEAM BB SHOWN CCA 5 Carpinus caroliniana BB 30' TYP./AS z AMERICAN HORNBEAM SHOWN CCT 8 Corylus colurna BB 30' TYP./AS o�c TURKISH FILBERT SHOWN CKY 7 Cladrastis kentuckea BB 30' TYP./AS z YELLOW WOOD SHOWN z�w V U Catalpa speciosa z 30' TYP./AS CSN 8 NORTHERN CATALPA BB SHOWN T_ 0 a /� Liriodendron tulipifera J V 30' TYP./AS LTT 6 TULIP TREE BB SHOWN Nyssa sylvatica 30' TYP./AS NSB 7 BLACK GUM BB SHOWN Ostrya virginiana 30' TYP./AS OVE 5 EASTERN HOP HORNBEAM BB SHOWN Ptelea trifoliata 30' TYP./AS PTH 4 HOP TREE BB SHOWN Platanus x acerifolia 30' TYP./AS PXA 7 LONDON PLANE TREE BB SHOWN QBS 6 Quercus bicolor BB 30' TYP./AS SWAMP WHITE OAK SHOWN QRL 3 Quercus rubra 'Long' BB 30' TYP./AS RED OAK SHOWN Robinia psuedoacacia 'Chicago Blues' 30' TYP./AS RPC 9 BLACK LOCUST BB SHOWN Ulmus americana 30' TYP./AS UAA 1 AMERICAN ELM BB SHOWN Ulmus parvifolia 30' TYP./AS UPC 2 BB CHINESE ELM SHOWN Ulmus rubra 30' TYP./AS URR 2 RED ELM BB SHOWN Ulmus thomasii 30' TYP./AS UTR 2 ROCK ELM BB SHOWN Zelkova serrata 'Musashino' 30' TYP./AS ZSM 8 ZELKOVA BB SHOWN 100 TREES PROVIDED* * 10% GENUS AND 5% MAX. SPECIES DISTRIBUTION INCLUDED. NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN; MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT 6" ABOVE GRADE OUTLOT A 444,957 SF 38 37 9,621 SF 8,540 SF 35-j 0S 8,505 SF 8,575 SF 3 6 I 8,204 SF 8,127 F 8,200 SF J 1 10,935 SF 0 N F— z HCY) M 0(ni D= AZO xzOU UU U O_ X Q L LU z ,3 <z w V) LU U 0Q J = U LL z0 z O Q ~ a CC � 0 N LU 0 LU L/) z LU w LU z Q Q CL LU z " c a o U 0 V)Cn r -I LU a- ¢z z0 � i ° Q J fV w d a Q Q U z LU > o�c w LU V) z v) z�w V U zQo z w z T_ 0 a /� un V I J V (I�, V SHEET NUMBER: L1.00 z LU w °_j Q J CL LU z " LU o V)Cn r -I O ¢z z0 z i wQ w 0 J fV " d SHEET NUMBER: L1.00 Feb 11, 2021 - 4:31pm 44 12,329 SF 184,1 \ 000 \ I \ \ I \ \ \ \ UTL T A -- 473,268 SF -QR \ 02-Q — 02 -PA ® 02 -QB SEED/SOD ALL 01 QM \ DISTURBED AREAS \ _ 03 -QM \ 03 -QB \ SEED/SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS D4 -QM 01 -BF 01 -RP 03 -PX 03 -CC 01 -PX 03 -CA 01 -BF 01 -RP 01 -RP 03 -BP 0 1 01 -DSR — 03 -PC � 01 -PA 03 -PC r\ o / / I 03 -BP 01 -RP i 03 -CA 02 -SR 01 -RP SEED/SOD ALL f�DISTURBED AREAS 45 152,271 SF / 01 -PX 03 -CC 11 ,fie V o / g / 19,405 SF vil-Survey Sheets Subdivision 200194 - L Sheets 18,249 SF SF 01 -BF 01 -RP 03 -PX 03 -CC yS C�] LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE LEGEND PLANTS: o PROPOSED DECIDUOUS LARGE TREE PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SMALL TREE PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE ® DECIDUOUS SHRUB EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASSES/FLOWERS GROUND COVER: SOD/SEED TURF IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS LANDSCAPE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS STREET TREES: 1 TREE / 60 LF (DOUBLE FRONTAGE) 941 LF FRONTAGE / 60 = 15.68 23 LARGE AND SMALL TREES PROVIDED RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 01 TREE PER UNIT PROVIDED ID CITY. BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME MIN. SIZE ROOT SPACING NOTES EVERGREEN TREES z" Picea abies'Cupressina' z PC 9 3' HEIGHT BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN a CUPRESSINA NORWAYSPRUCE Q JLU L Ln UO) Picea abies zw o LU PA 5 — 3' HEIGHT BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN Ln 0 z NORWAY SPRUCE ° o w o LU a DECIDUOUS TREES J ° N Platanus x acerifolia " Q PX 8 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN z LONDON PLANE TREE > Quercus bicolor o�c ~ QB 8 `_ 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN SWAMP WHITE OAK ZYw V U z z� Quercus rubra 'Clemons' z QR 5 Ln V I 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN RED OAK Quercus macrocarpa QM 10 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN BUR OAK Robinia psuedoacacia'Chicago Blues' RP 6 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN BLACK LOCUST Betula platyphylla'Fargo' DAKOTA PINNACLE BF 3 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Cercis cnadensis'NC2016-2' PPAF CA 6 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN T FLAME THROWER REDBUD Cercis nsis' Pansy' CC 9 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN DBU FORESTTPANPANSY REDBUD reticulata SR 3 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN JAPAa JAPANESE TREE LILAC Betula papyrifera BP 6 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN PAPER BIRCH " + " Notation on plan indicates tree required for woodland removal offset. 23 of 66 trees utilized in Lot 45. " * " Notation on plan indicates street tree requirement. 0 JEll 0 N o ` U Oz UU U O_ X Q U w w Z Z w LU Q D LU U 0Q J = U Z 0 Z O 0 w D > LU L2.00 z" LU z Q � a Q JLU L Ln UO) zw o LU — 0 - Q < z Q Ln 0 z U Q ° o w o LU a U J ° N " Q d U Q z LU > o�c ~ w 2 `_ w () Q0 ZYw V U z z� w z T— d' i a ^� I..L Ln V I J V (I�, V L2.00 z" LU Q J JLU L Ln zw o — 0 - Q < z 2E w00O Ln 0 z U Q ° o w o J U J ° N " d L2.00 1 CO 4 TC IImIImoIIrmlim�T�%%i, 1 CO 3 PS ��'��wo ojr I' 'mm Niompo 0 vdo" dor,��.,Oo�� 6 m duo. 01 wo Oro ��QIIIII Upll��llll II � . ppp.�©�� i% ' 01 of, � � -- 00- W -E wavo.0.0,00 .,� 9 / ,• •' aON ♦.O O©p� -,,A INS �/ 00 �Iiy� Opp �m.��./ /' �/ 1 MA 6 MXP 11 1, o 11 „ ll „ _ _ _ �II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II�II� Feb 10, 2021 - 3:25pm Z:\Projects2\20042-IC SENIOR LIVING\04 CAD\03 Current\, 3 GD 2 CR 0 PV-O,O/llo.o: � Mr, ,0101000, �e foo VI.010,® ®. o/ HIM ►�� �b��^gig o o \►�'' / e / od `�► i�A , , pr � •za�r� p�♦p`�� r � �i� � P� I1 mo. wg ow 2 CR 1 CO 1 MA 0 2 CR 1 QC 1 QM 1 PA 3 PG 1 QC 1 CO 2 GD 2 QM 2 TC 1 PA LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY SETBACK WATER TELECOM GAS ELECTRIC SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER EXISTING EASEMENT TP TREE PROTECTION FENCING 995 EXISTING CONTOUR TREE REMOVAL LIMITS AT EDGE OF CONSERVATION SII EASEMENT SHADE TREE SHRUB / O D0 PERENNIAL + + TURFGRASS EVERGREEN TREE ++ ORNAMENTAL TREE TALL FESCUE/ SHORT GRASS PRAIRIE MIX genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 WWW.GENUS-LA.COM C N N Z rn Q� rn V Z° U >< Oz VO U O x Q LU LU z LU w a 0 V) z Q U 0 z 0 U cn L_1 0 I V) w z Q co a a C) Ln W i2L � J 0 Q o= w paC Q Q < U � z LU > Q Cr J w 20 (D z LD , � z �C J v7 a 0 U w_ wLU z z� Ln z a�0oo�l z z� w 0 J SHEET NUMBER: LU L3.00 a z o= Q Cr J (D z LD , � > 0 a�0oo�l z z� w 0 z w U z0 Q w 0 J SHEET NUMBER: LU L3.00 Pm urren wg PLANTING NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO PLANTING AND SHALL REPORT ANY CONFLICTS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES (LINES, DUCTS, CONDUITS, SLEEVES, FOOTINGS, ETC.) WITH LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS (FENCE, FOOTINGS, TREE ROOTBALLS, ETC.). CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONTINUING WORK. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES. 4. IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS DRAWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN AND THE NUMBER OF PLANTS IN THE SCHEDULE, THE NUMBER OF PLANTS ON PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 5. ALL PLANT MATERIALS MUST CONFORM TO AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK ANSI Z 60.1, OR LATEST EDITION PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, WASHINGTON D.C. LARGER SIZED PLANT MATERIALS OF THE SPECIES LISTED MAY BE USED IF THE STOCK CONFORMS TO THE A.S.N.S. 6. ANY PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT SPECIES SHALL BE MADE WITH PLANTS OF EQUIVALENT OVERALL FORM, HEIGHT, BRANCHING HABIT, FLOWER, LEAF, COLOR, FRUIT AND CULTURE, AND ONLY AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTE PLANT MATERIAL TYPE, SIZE, AND/OR QUANTITY. 8. STAKE LOCATION OF ALL PROPOSED PLANTING FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF PLANTING. 9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DAMAGE DUE TO OPERATIONS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PER PLAN. ANY AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMIT OF WORK THAT ARE DISTURBED SHALL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 10. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND MATERIALS INJURIOUS TO PLANT GROWTH FROM PLANTING PITS AND BEDS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING WITH PLANTING SOIL. 11. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, TREES TO BE CENTERED IN PLANTING AREAS. 12. TO AVOID DISRUPTION TO EXISTING TREES, HAND DIGGING REQUIRED WITHIN DRIP LINE OF TREES. NO TREE ROOTS OVER 1" IN DIAMETER ARE TO BE CUT. 13. PROVIDE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH, NATURAL COLOR, IN ALL PLANT SAUCERS AND PLANTING BEDS TO A 3 -INCH MAXIMUM DEPTH. APPLY PRE -EMERGENT TO ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 14. NEW TREES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF PLANT BEDS, SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF SIX FEET AWAY FROM PLANT BED. 15. NO TREES OR SHRUBS SHALL BE PLANTED CLOSER THAN 5' FROM ANY UTILITY SERVICE VALVE, BASED ON ANTICIPATED TRUNK SIZE. OVERSTORY TREES QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 2 WF ABIES CONCOLOR WHITE FIR 6'-8' HT B&B AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 6 CR CARPINUS CAROLINIANA AMERICAN HORNBEAM 2" CAL. B&B 2" CAL. 6 CO CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY 2" CAL. B&B B&B MULTI -STEM 8 GT GLIDETSIA TRICANTHOS 'SKYLINE' SKYLINE HONEY LOCUST 2" CAL. B&B 7 11 GD GYMNOCLADUS DIOCUS 'ESPRESSO' ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEE TREE 2" CAL. B&B SR 8 MA MACCKIA AMURENSIS AMUR MAAKIA 2" CAL. B&B VX 6' 1 NS NYSSA SYLVANTICA BLACK TUPELO 2" CAL. B&B 5'X 4.5' 5 PA PICEA ABIES NORWAY SPRUCE 6'-8' HT B&B 4'X 4' 3 PG PICEA CLAUCA'DENSATA' BLACK HILLS SPRICE 6'-8' HT B&B 13'X 3' 3 PS PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE 6'-8' HT B&B 2'X 3' 3 QC QUERCUS COCCINEA SCARLET OAK 2" CAL. B&B 4'X 6' 4 QM QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2" CAL. B&B 10 TC TSUGA CANADENSIS EASTERN HEMLOCK 6'-8' HT B&B SHRUBS QTY ORNAMENTAL TREES BOTANICAL COMMON QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT NOTES 5 AG AMELANCHIER X GRAN DIFLORA'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 6 CG CRATEGUS CRUS-GALLI VAR. INERMIS THORNLESS COCKSPIR HAWTHRON 2" CAL. B&B 2 MS MAGNOLIA X SOULANGEANA SAUCER MAGNOLIA 8' HT B&B MULTI -STEM 12 MXP MALUS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' PRAIRIE FIRE CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 7 MXS MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE 1.5" CAL. B&B 3 SR SYRINGA RETICULATA SSP. RETICULATA'IVORY SILK' IVORY SILK JAPANESE TREE LILAC 2" CAL. B&B SHRUBS QTY KEY BOTANICAL COMMON SIZE ROOT MATURE SIZE (HT. X WIDTH) 23 BB CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS BUTTONBUSH #1 CONT. 6'X 5' 175 DK DIERVILLA'KODIAK ORANGE' KODIAK ORANGE DIERVILLA 18" HT CONT. 4'X 4' 6 HV HAMAMELIS VIRGINIANA WITCH HAZEL 6' HT CONT 10' X 8' 16 BB HYDRANGEA PAN ICU LATA'ILVOBO' PP#22,782 BOBO HARDY HYDRANGEA #3 CONT. 3'X 4' 7 IV ITEA VIRGINICA LITTLE HENRY SWEETSPIRE #3 CONT. 3'X 3' 69 JH JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'HUGHES' HUGHES JUNIPER #3 CONT. VX 6' 146 PO PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS NINEBARK #1 CONT 5'X 4.5' 3 RL RHODODENDRON X'LANDMARK' LANDMARK RHODODENDRON #3 CONT. 4'X 4' 90 ST SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA'TOR' TOR SPIREA #3 CONT. 13'X 3' 3 BZ SPIRAEA MEDIA DOUBLE PLAY BLUE KAZOO SPIREA #3 CONT. 2'X 3' 25 TD TAXUS X MEDIA'DENSIFORM IS' DENSE SPREADING YEW 48" HT CONT. 4'X 6' genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 WWW.GENUS-LA.COM 0 N N r � Z °' CY) J m Zo O� z U O U O x a w z D z LU LU a 0 V) w CD z a U LL O z O a U w 0 I N LU z Q Co Q o LU CL � J O Q w Q paC Q Q U LU LLJ LU cn z O J L a O w Uw oc Z z� ../ T_ 0 i � Ln J (/ d U J SHEET NUMBER: LU L3.01 w J Z) n w _ U cn 0 Q z Lu 2 o U zLD OcrJ z z w V) Lj.j0 Q z z� w 0 O z w U p z Q o rl U o w o = J Ln J = N V) a J SHEET NUMBER: LU L3.01 eb 10, 2021 - 3:27pm Z:\Projects2\20042- rrent\20042- O EDGE OF PLANTING AREA z 01120. C. 2 O a SPACING U) PLANT CENTER I SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS PERENNIAL PLANTING NOT TO SCALE ROOTBALL 3/16" x 4" STEEL EDGING, GALVANIZED UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 2X ROOTBALL oil SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OVERSTORY TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 2X ROOTBALL EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE 01�1� SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ORNAMENTAL TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE SET ROOT FLARE 2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. REMOVE BURLAP AND WIRE CAGE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOTBALL. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, 2" THICKNESS FINISH GRADE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE genus [ landscape architects ] 325 EAST 5TH STREET DES MOINES, IA 50309 T 515 284 1010 WWW.GENUS-LA.COM 0 N N _z� Q � -I m V) 2i -Zou U pz VO / U 2 O_ X Q LU z z z LU LU Q 0 LU C7 O Q J 2 U LL z0 z o_ Q ~ a DC � 0 N LU 0 LU Cn Cn LU z Q o Co a o ~ = UO J LU 0- (D z � LU ° Q > J LU 0 w a Q zz�zZzo paC Q Q U pow Q U J Ln -17 (V z LU a > w O LU V) Q J 2 QO F� U U w z z� w z , T� 0= i ALU V / J m U J SHEET NUMBER: w L3.02 Cn z J o QV) N LU ~ = J (D z LU > a- DC LU 0 Q zz�zZzo Irl LU O w U pow Q o J Ln J (V x a J SHEET NUMBER: w L3.02 COMMONS FRONT i Y IZI u EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE CONCRETE 5PLA5H BLOGK5 AT ALL DOWNSPOUTS WHIGH SFILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOF5. 2. ALL CONDO . METER5. VENTS, ETC. TO BE PANTED TO MATCH ADJAGENT 5URFAGE. 5. 6UI'TER5 AND DOWN5P0UT5 ARE FREFH15HED ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES - MR 5TANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Ft FIBER GEMENT 5VNG- COLOR A F2 FIBER GEMENT 51DN6 - COLOR B FPi VERTIGAL FIBER GEMENT PANEL BATTEN5 AT ib" O.L. - COLOR A A THREE DIMEN51ONAL A5PHALT 5HIN&LE5 M5 MANUFACTURED 5TONE W WOOD LOOK GLADDIN& ELEVATION = 126'-0" ELEVATION = 124'-0" TRU55EE,4RINr A. ELEVATION = iib' -0" _ TRIl55EEARINC4$� �ELEVATON = 114'-0" AEEARNG—� ELEVATION = 112-b" �SEGGWD FLOOR OP TION =FL�� ELEVATION = i10'-07 FIRST FLOOR TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVATION = 100'-0" TR F -G SEARNG ELEVATION = 126'-0" _ — — -TRLE"EARN6- Idd ELEVATION = 124'-0" TRIlS5-15FARN6 V ELEVATION - 11b'-0" TRJFFjBEARNC� ELEVATION = 114'-0" EARNCz — ELLEVATIEvA-n ON = 172'-b" 5EGOND FLOOR TOP QESUBFl Q ELEVATION = 110'-11 7/ FIK5T FLOOR SOP OF CZbGRETF ELEVATION = 100'-0" Hickory Trails Estates 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Iowa City, Iowa 15 DEC 2020 9 Architecture 111. U.....000 PVF. WAUWATOSA, W1 53313 OI 4.931.3131 TEL A14.431.0531 FAX Ar a h i l F a lu F g i n e F n g P l a n n i n g EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1, PROVIDE CONCRETE 5PLA514 BLOGK5 AT ALL DOWN51FOUT5 WHICH 5PILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOF5. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METER5, VENTS, ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT 5URFAGE. 5, 6UTTER5 AND DOWN5P0VT5 ARE PREFINII ALUMINUM. EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTE5 MR 5TANDING 5EAM METAL ROOF Fl FIBER CEMENT 51DING - COLOR A F2 FIBER GEMENT 5IDIN6 - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER GEMENT PANEL BATTEN5 AT 16" O.G. - COLOR A A THREE DIMEN51ONAL A5PHALT 5HII LE5 M5 MANUFAGTUI 5TONE W WOOD LOOK CLADDING 2 MEMORY CARE 1 n vl TRU55 BEARING /—ELh EVATION = 111-0' V TRU55 BEARINGh ELEVATION = 104 _-6" Y FIRST FLOOR TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVATION = 100'-0" TRV55 BEARINGh ELEVATION = 115-0" R TRU55 BEARING ELEVA7ION=104-6" FIR5T FLOOR TOP OF CONCRETE ELEVATION - 100-0" Hickory Trails Estates 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Iowa City, Iowa 15 DEC 2020 9 Architecture 1414 WOOD . WAUWATOSA, 1 53213 A. E Ii I.E c ra E D g i A E n g P l a n. t. g E Y nn ■■■ ■ ■ nn nnu ■■■ ■ ■ nn n■■ ■ ■ nn A5515TED LIVING 4 12" FIBER 10" FIBER 6" FIBER MANUFAG URED ME MANUFACTURED STONE SILL VIII III III IIN11 1111 ARI AI II I ui ii ui Niui unn ■ o iui iu w i VIII III IIII I@ 111111 1111 VIII tll II I 1111111111 IIII 111111111111 1111 VIII III II I Hili ii m nnn n n um ui iu i ni n � Miu nnn u u Hid III iu ui i INC 1 F2 – 1111 1�...1 16_.. 1111 11 11 11 11 11 1 STONE N A 4 ' II 1111 111111 111111 111111 111111 111111 TRU55 BEARN6 TRU55BEARIN6 _ ELEVATION = 131'-0 T/6" THIRD FLOOR TOP OF 5UBFLOOR ELEVATION .. SECOND FLOOR TOP OF 51BFLOOR –M5 – – – – ELEVATION = 110'-01 1/8" 9 1111 � 111111 1111 1111 1111 1111111 1111 1111 1111 111111 1111 1111 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1'111 11 11 11 11 I 11 11 11 11 11 11 STONE FIRST FLOOR TOP OF CONCRETE _ I� ELEVATION = 100•-0" V F2 SILL n O MS 6" FIBER CEMENT TRIM M5 TRUx BEARINS -ELEVATION= ' AL ,2-b V5' _ _ _ _ 7RJ55BEFRIN ELEVATION = 131'-0 T/5" SECOND FLOOR TOP OF 5UBFLOOR ELEVATION = 121'-11 3/4" —6" FIBER CEMENT TRIM —10" FIBER CEMENT TRIM —MANUFACTURED STONE BAND SECOND FLOOR TOP OF EUBFLOOR It, ELEVATION = 110'-I T/S' CTURED STONE ELL FIRST FLOOR TOP OF CONCRETE AILL ELEVATION = 100'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1, PROVIDE CONCRETE 5PL H BLOCKS AT ALL DON1,15POUT5 nHICH 5PILL ONTO GRADE OR ROOFS. 2. ALL CONDUIT, METERS, VENT5, ETC. TO BE PANTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. 3, GUTTERS AND DONN5POL75 ARE PREPH15HED ALUMINUM. FPCMRIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTE5� MR STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF F7 FIBER GEMENT 5V N6 - COLOR A F2 FIBER GEMENT 51DN& - COLOR B FP1 VERTICAL FIBER CEMENT PANEL BATTENS AT 16" O C. - COLOR A A THREE DIMEN51ONAL ASPHALT 5HIN6LE5 M5 MANUFACTURED STONE N WOOD LOOK CLADDIN6 A N I® 10" FIBER GEMENT TRIM –,MANUFACTURED 5TONE BAND STONE ELEVATION = 132- _ TRUE BEARN6 �y ELEVATION; 131'- O V6" Y .. THIRD FLOOR TOP OF S BFLOOR ELEVATION = 121'-11 3/4" SECOND FLOOR TOP OF SUB ELEVATION =110'-00 110'-10 V5" a I 4 – _ – TRUSS BENiIN& ELEVATION - 132$ "1/8" _TRUSS BEARIN6 _ ELEVATION = 131'-0 T/8" THIRD FLOOR _TOP OF WBFLOOR _ h ELEVATION= 121'-11 3/4" V SECOND FLOOR _TOP OF WBFLOOR ELEVATION = 110'-11 FIRST FLOOR _TOP OF CONCRETE _ I� ELEVATION=100'-0" Y Eel FIRST FLOOR ETI , Hi ckoI Trails Estates ELEVATION = 100'-0" __,,Hickory 1/8" EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Iowa City, Iowa 15 DEC 2020 L Architecture 1414 wOOn AVE. WAUWATOSA, MIT 53313 031.3131 <.:4.43::31 <. 031.0531 FAX WWW.AGARCH.COM A.,b ecru e g n g P l a n n i n g ` moi' / ' �' --- ` ` \ \` \ \` \\ \ \\ \ ` `\ \ \ \ \ `�`� ♦ \ \ \\ � \ _� / \ \ \ \ \\ \� �\ � � � \ �\ � ��` �__- _--_ CG6)--- r/�G65,IV 7 _ -- ' / / r r 1 i i I ' // / ' r' r' i \\\\ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \\ \ \ \ II \ 1 \\ \ G6) \ rt - d /� r7 V/�7 Di �i 0 �7 A� I I / r r r \ \ V A \ 1 ' '� / - I sc ��� F� C -6 9 V/ V/ V/ IV 17i IV I7 I r , r r r - \ ' ---- I I I I, r r , / A, A 1 1 A\ \ 1 1 \, 1 1 , 1 / - I AI �L �( _ �_(G � 1 �I I l �1 I I I r r , , _ _S7-1' 0 �7 P �/ 0/ 0 I U \ \ l0 V I I I r r , / r - _ _ / / 1 I / / 1 1 1 1 I 1 �c ' - _ - - ' / I I \\ \\I \ I I r i' r' r' \ '—FFG) iso, V- 7_7_ 7'0 V, 5717/ 0 ® Ik71 DI V\�\ T l / / l // �� \ / 17 7 0 0 0 V 0 1'� DNx - \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \MIN / r - ' - /1\\ 0 V V V 0 7 \7 '7/V/ 7�-8 yJ �1i A� AA V \ V A ` V-- 0 V 0 0 0 7 7 ri .l ��STS7- �_�'����'----------- i i�%i�� - _ -- I 1111, 1 11111111 I 1 I 1 II 1 II I� f✓I I II i I i i i l'/'�� - - __ '4-775---���-- -i��' /-=�_�-- -1 1 I I I 1 1 , I I III ► 11 I _ _ --- �__���_ ------- '- --- _ '- ----1 - A _ - --- =8- - ' - - /rr-� ��7 ------ �� ---------- - --_ ---- -- / I I I UI I V A \V - - - - � 1 / \ / 'iYr� Q �7 Qom- -- - - -i I II I L I I /I�f�l I \V A A V 1 r T �F�'� - U�T------- - v -- - V I - n'n -- E-nw_- r//-�-�-0--------------- J I I I 1111 I \ \ \ \ - --- _ - / , 1 Wt -E A TYL --� S� , I I I I I I I v v v v 1 v v 1 v v i 1 // r ------------ ____U --- / ------------ ---- �'�/�,'�/ 6 -o -o ---- --- ----- -- ---- IT/� �N ' - _-------- --_ - /�/I I t \\ 11 \\ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \I\\\ \\ II 1 / / / /� / ---- j - --- q I LE I All 78 \ \\ \\�0 -------- _--_ > --' \U N�`F 1 \ k/� j�l X71 D ---------- ---- _ ' // - ---- _ - - -----_ ------------ _ _ �' / / / / / // / r \�\ V\ v ---- VI 17 \ G�y� i N/1 1 V A A 1 1 I k \ /\ r�i 25 26' 785------- 71 A�,f ` ` 45 /1 I 47' G) - \\_- \ I ----- �_- \ TYL v`� \♦ � 1 I I I I I I \ \ \ \ r-- r�/ r I I I I I I //- J I 1 1 1 1 I ',lllllllll l u1NIT 1 r STl� / ���'`; �\ \ ; I Iii l' � / ,' i / / ' ' � '� / ✓ �� / , ____ l / , \ \\� an 22, 2021 - 4:45pm gn Civil -Survey Sheets Condos 200194 - Condo - an / I � I / / / I / / a SITE INFORMATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 45 HICKORY TRAIL ESTATES (PLAT PENDING APPROVAL) TOTAL LOT AREA: 174,338 SF (4.00 AC) PURPOSE OF DEVELOPMENT DETACHED, SINGLE—FAMILY CONDOMINIUM 10 UNITS ZONING INFORMATION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE — LOW—DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (OPD/RS-5) SETBACKS AND YARDS FRONT YARD 15 FEET SIDE YARD 5 FEET REAR YARD 20 FEET N. SCOTT BLVD 40 FEET MINIMUM LOT AREA AND LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS MIN. LOT AREA 8,000 SF MIN. LOT WIDTH 60 FEET MIN. LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET FLOOD ELEVATION N/A BUILDING INFORMATION 26' 13' 13' 12' 5' 7" PCC PAVEMENT 2.50% 2.50% 1.50% T1. 4" PCC SIDEWALK 6" SUBBASELu z Lu a a 6" SUBDRAIN TYPICAL 26' PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION NOT TO SCALE O /\ N N lD zr -I J M M D 0(n 2 O ` U 0 z V° U O x L Lu Lu z - w w H Q 0 N Lu V (.0 O Q J = U z0 z O Q ~ 0- 0 Lu ow 0 Lu Lu 1..x..1 Q V) z 1w 50 J SG Q G 0� J � O Q UDC OAC � w � z � � w U a= O a z u 0 EXTERIOR FINISHES: ROOFING: CERTAINTEED LANDMARK WEATHERED WOOD SINGLES MASONRY: ELDORADO STONE — MONTICETO CLIFFSTON WINDOWS: ANDERSON 200—SERIES SIDING: DIAMOND KOTE LP SMART SIDE COLOR OPTION 1 0 LL w C c/) c N Ic SIDING FRENCH GRAY (LP SMART SIDE) C2.00 SOFFIT & FASCIA WHITE (ROLEX) TRIM WHITE (DIAMOND KOTE) GARAGE DOORS WHITE FRONT DOOR SW ROYCROFT COPPER RED (SW#2839) COLOR OPTION 2 SIDING FRENCH GRAY (LP SMART SIDE) SOFFIT & FASCIA CLAY (ROLEX) TRIM CLAY (DIAMOND KOTE) GARAGE DOORS SANDSTONE FRONT DOOR SW ROYCROFT BRONZE GREEN (SW#2846) COLOR OPTION 3 SIDING CLAY (LP SMART SIDE) SOFFIT & FASCIA WHITE (ROLEX) TRIM CLAY (DIAMOND KOTE) GARAGE DOORS SANDSTONE FRONT DOOR SW ROYCROFT PEWTER (SW#2848) 26' 13' 13' 12' 5' 7" PCC PAVEMENT 2.50% 2.50% 1.50% T1. 4" PCC SIDEWALK 6" SUBBASELu z Lu a a 6" SUBDRAIN TYPICAL 26' PRIVATE DRIVE SECTION NOT TO SCALE O /\ N N lD zr -I J M M D 0(n 2 O ` U 0 z V° U O x L Lu Lu z - w w H Q 0 N Lu V (.0 O Q J = U z0 z O Q ~ 0- 0 Lu ow 0 Lu Lu 1..x..1 Q V) z 1w 50 J SG Q G 0� J � O Q UDC OAC � w � z � � w U a= O a z u 0 V u UL L V z Z 0 Q w� U Q Lu L z wu 0 LL w C c/) c N Ic SHEET NUMBER: C2.00 z 2 U W rn r-1 O I O fV // / \ \ V A \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ — /// `— - /� 0OT A 2 -OR r95�7 S F R --- ,-- 1 \ \\\\ \\ \ \ / / / 02-Q _ 02 -PA / 0 -- J SEED/SOD ALL \ \ 01 -QM �DISTURBE� S / � � _ ZZ \ �, /21,4 5 03- P \ 03- / 01- P I / 1 I / OCA 02 -SR ° O / I 01 -RP 01 -RP I � 03 PX� \ \ 03 -CC \ \ \ S OD ALL _ 16, 3 S \ DISTURBED \/ / 01 -PX \ // / I I 03 -CC / r / / ° � 03 -PX 03 -CC ° \ I \ \ Q3-Q�\ 01 -PX O i / \ O ° SEE "D/SOD ALL \ �DITU'�B� A7EAS V I I 01 -BF / / 16,8 \ 01 -RP \ I I I I I 01 -RP \ \ I I I 03 -BP >> J I I 7 LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE 15 SF 15 31 04/ / O 01 -SR / \ / / 03 -PC / / 5,2 F / \ \ \ 01- O I I02 PCI \ 1 s 1 I � 17,/ II � Jan 22, 2021 - 4:19pm gn Civil -Survey Sheets Subdivision 200194 - L Sheets LANDSCAPE LEGEND PLANTS: o PROPOSED DECIDUOUS LARGE TREE PROPOSED DECIDUOUS SMALL TREE PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE ® DECIDUOUS SHRUB EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASSES/FLOWERS GROUND COVER- SOD/SEED TURF IN ALL DISTURBED AREAS LANDSCAPE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS STREET-TREES- 1 TREETTREES:1 TREE / 60 LF (DOUBLE FRONTAGE) 941 LF FRONTAGE / 60 = 15.68 23 LARGE AND SMALL TREES PROVIDED RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 01 TREE PER UNIT PROVIDED ID QTY. BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME MIN. SIZE ROOT SPACING NOTES EVERGREEN TREES z �= L, Picea abies'Cupressina' N LU = CL J PC 9 3' HEIGHT BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN CUPRESSINA NORWAYSPRUCE Lr) ern Ln U U-) Picea abies O Lr) Cn Q C) LU PA 5 Z l— z 0 Q 3' HEIGHT BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN = J J N a NORWAY SPRUCE O SHEET NUMBER: DECIDUOUS TREES ° Platanus x acerlfolla U PX 8 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN oC U LONDON PLANE TREE w Q0 Q Quercus bicolor Z QO QB 8 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN SWAMP WHITE OAK a = V Quercus rubra'Clemons' V QR 5 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN RED OAK Quercus macrocarpa QM 10 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN BUR OAK Robinia psuedoacacia'Chicago Blues' RP 6 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN BLACK LOCUST Betula platyphylla'Fargo' DAKOTA PINNACLE BF 3 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Cercis canadensis'NC2016-2' PPAF CA 6 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN FLAME THROWER REDBUD Cercis canadensi s 'Forest Pansy' CC 9 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN FOREST PANSY REDBUD Syringa reticulata SR 3 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN JAPANESE TREE LILAC Betula papyrifera BP 6 2 1/2" DBH BB SEE PLAN NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN PAPER BIRCH " + " Notation on plan indicates tree required for woodland removal offset. 23 of 66 trees utilized in Lot 45. " * " Notation on plan indicates street tree requirement. O N N lD Z J M M 0(n72 ` U Oz V° U O X Q w LU Z ,3 <Z W V) LU U O Q J = U z0 Z Q O a tY � 0 w 0 LU Z z Q z �= L, W N LU = CL J U = ( z z w� w f r,4 Lr) ern Ln U U-) Q O Lr) Cn Q C) LU 01 O Z l— z 0 Q J 0 Q LL = J J N a d O SHEET NUMBER: paC ° L2.00 U oC U w Q0 Q Z QO V U z � zrn a = V V Z z Q z �= L, O H LU = CL J U = ( z z w� w CL Ln U O Lr) Cn Q C) o 01 O Z l— z 0 Q o 0 Q LL = J J N d C..4 SHEET NUMBER: ° L2.00 MATERIALS NOTES: I. IT IS THE OWNER OR CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE THE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT AGAINST THE BUILD-UP OF MOISTURE OR MOLD. 2, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REFERENCED HEREIN ARE FOR SCHEMATIC PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT COMPLY WITH YOUR LOCAL ZONING OR SAFETY REG=ULATIONS. OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CHOICE AND SELECTION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. FLASHING TO BE INSTALLED: 1, AT WALL AND ROOF INTERSECTIONS 2. WHEREVER THERE'S A CHANGE IN ROOF SLOPE OR DIRECTION, 3. AROUND ROOF OPENINGS ICE PROTECTION: I. 2 LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT CEMENTED TOGETHER OR OF A SELF -ADHERING POLYMER MODIFIED BITUMEN SHEET EXTENDED FROM THE EAVES EDGE TO A POINT AT LEAST 24" INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE OF THE BUILDING. ROOF DRAINAGE: 1, COLLECT AND DISCHARGE ALL ROOF DRAINAGE TO THE GROUND SURFACE AT LEAST 5 FEET FROM FOUNDATION WALLS OR TO AN APPROVED DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ROOF DESIGN: 1. VERIFY HEEL HGTS. ON TRUSSES. ALL HEEL HGTS. MAY NOT BE THE SAME. 2, WALL HGTS, m RAFTERED AREAS MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED UP OR DOWN TO MATCH HEELS a TRUSSED AREAS SO FASCIA LINES MATCH UP. VERIFY HGTS. W/ TRUSS MFR. ROOF VENTILATION - 1, PROVIDE RIDGE VENTS AND SOFFIT VENTS AS REQ'D BY CODE. TOP OF PLATE _S'-10" SOFFIT NGT, TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW 10" FRIEZE BOARD 01 � HORIZONTAL SIDIN( STONE SILL MAIN FLOOR MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER ASPHALT SHINGLES /0:12 PITCH VERTICAL SIDING 11�11 1111 FRONT ELEVATION 'A' SCALE: 1/4 1'-0" 12 4ALT SHIN( ro:12 PITCH NOTE: PROVIDE FUTURE RAMP AS REQ'D TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW MAIN FLOOR t'I TAPERED DECD SUPPORT COLUMN W/ 16" BASE ON 24" MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER WRAPPED BASE REAR ELEVATION 'AI SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" 9 (CAPE WALL L1�D-VERIFY ,RADE 3'-10" _(�- FIT HIGT. FRIEZE BOARD TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW_ MAIN FLOOR ACCORDING TO IRC WINDOW FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, SOME WINDOWS MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED, OR BE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED W/ A WINDOW FALL PREVENTION DEVICE, VERIFY W/ LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 8:12 PITCH V-10" TOP OF PLATE 50FFIT ZT, 10" FRIEZE BOARD TOP OP WINDOW_ Ad t s MAIN FLOOR SCREEN PORCH TOP OF PLATE TOP OP WINDOW O s TOP OF SLAB 10" ".4 riry I ) c AHMANN DESIGN INC. (319) 395-7900 0. ~ W �zNN d� z�N� pLL z4)wN W wq�3 V tl1= 0 (k�wa3 O�QpW�cO U WN zN wpN�=ate= aW0}HOwN cp J pawgZ0. �WE-j W LL LL pQ LL wWzIII m m a w p z zui 30w-Iz9.4 9.n o zQo�—z waam w-IT_F 03 w`�WwppoaO w Oq Ao ,p(U= �-a HU WW 00-40 oz � W'z(K3-u0)0 U W N U N o fIL a Q o - LLOOLLU=W ILO 0C1gLLff ~a0.~azmgr llzzli~a�p�3n zoozz=R�d) �p a0rna 0 =3n.3 LL O OzZ�Nzmpcq zpOz�paHz QUUQq~ a i 0 LL i Q Q z V aaoa�aa�o DRAWN 5Y: MF CHECKED 51': FINAL RELEASE: REVISIONS: C, 0 JOB NO, 21-01100 1*44 0 0 2 IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND/OR DETAILS. THE CONTRACTOR / SUB -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT AHMANN DESIGN, INC,0 (319) 395-1900 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION FOR CLARIFICATION, IF AHMANN DESIGN IS NOT CONTACTED, THE CONTRACTOR/ SUB -CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY. © COPYRIGHT 2021AHMANN HOME PLANS INC. PROTECTED UNDER ARCHITECTURAL WORKS COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 TOP OP WINDOW 10" a� Q MAIN FLOOR TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW m O TOP OF BLAB _S'-10" SOFFIT NGT, TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW 10" FRIEZE BOARD 01 � HORIZONTAL SIDIN( STONE SILL MAIN FLOOR MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER ASPHALT SHINGLES /0:12 PITCH VERTICAL SIDING 11�11 1111 FRONT ELEVATION 'A' SCALE: 1/4 1'-0" 12 4ALT SHIN( ro:12 PITCH NOTE: PROVIDE FUTURE RAMP AS REQ'D TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW MAIN FLOOR t'I TAPERED DECD SUPPORT COLUMN W/ 16" BASE ON 24" MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER WRAPPED BASE REAR ELEVATION 'AI SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" 9 (CAPE WALL L1�D-VERIFY ,RADE 3'-10" _(�- FIT HIGT. FRIEZE BOARD TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW_ MAIN FLOOR ACCORDING TO IRC WINDOW FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, SOME WINDOWS MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED, OR BE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED W/ A WINDOW FALL PREVENTION DEVICE, VERIFY W/ LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 8:12 PITCH V-10" TOP OF PLATE 50FFIT ZT, 10" FRIEZE BOARD TOP OP WINDOW_ Ad t s MAIN FLOOR SCREEN PORCH TOP OF PLATE TOP OP WINDOW O s TOP OF SLAB 10" ".4 riry I ) c AHMANN DESIGN INC. (319) 395-7900 0. ~ W �zNN d� z�N� pLL z4)wN W wq�3 V tl1= 0 (k�wa3 O�QpW�cO U WN zN wpN�=ate= aW0}HOwN cp J pawgZ0. �WE-j W LL LL pQ LL wWzIII m m a w p z zui 30w-Iz9.4 9.n o zQo�—z waam w-IT_F 03 w`�WwppoaO w Oq Ao ,p(U= �-a HU WW 00-40 oz � W'z(K3-u0)0 U W N U N o fIL a Q o - LLOOLLU=W ILO 0C1gLLff ~a0.~azmgr llzzli~a�p�3n zoozz=R�d) �p a0rna 0 =3n.3 LL O OzZ�Nzmpcq zpOz�paHz QUUQq~ a i 0 LL i Q Q z V aaoa�aa�o DRAWN 5Y: MF CHECKED 51': FINAL RELEASE: REVISIONS: C, 0 JOB NO, 21-01100 1*44 0 0 2 IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND/OR DETAILS. THE CONTRACTOR / SUB -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT AHMANN DESIGN, INC,0 (319) 395-1900 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION FOR CLARIFICATION, IF AHMANN DESIGN IS NOT CONTACTED, THE CONTRACTOR/ SUB -CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY. © COPYRIGHT 2021AHMANN HOME PLANS INC. PROTECTED UNDER ARCHITECTURAL WORKS COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 MATERIALS NOTES: 1, IT IS THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE THE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT AGAINST THE BUILD-UP OF MOISTURE OR MOLD, 2. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REFERENCED HEREIN ARE FOR SCHEMATIC PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT COMPLY WITH YOUR LOCAL ZONING OR SAFETY REGULATIONS, OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CHOICE AND SELECTION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, FLASHING TO BE INSTALLED: I, AT WALL AND ROOF INTERSECTIONS 2, WHEREVER THERE'S A CHANGE IN ROOF SLOPE OR DIRECTION, 3, AROUND ROOF OPENINGS ICE PROTECTION: 1, 2 LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT CEMENTED TOGETHER OR OF A SELF -ADHERING POLYMER MODIFIED BITUMEN SHEET EXTENDED FROM THE EAVE'S EDGE TO A POINT AT LEAST 24" INSIDE THE EXTERIOR WALL LINE OF THE BUILDING. ROOF DRAINAGE: 1, COLLECT AND DISCHARGE ALL ROOF DRAINAGE TO THE GROUND SURFACE AT LEAST 5 FEET FROM FOUNDATION WALLS OR TO AN APPROVED DRAINAGE SYSTEM, ROOF DESIGN: 1, VERIFY HEEL HGTS, ON TRUSSES, ALL HEEL HGTS. MAY NOT BE THE SAME. 2. WALL HGTB, m RAFTERED AREAS MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED UP OR DOWN TO MATCH HEELS ID TRUSSED AREAS SO FASCIA LINES MATCH UP. VERIFY HGTS, W/ TRUSS MFR, ROOF VENTILATION: I, PROVIDE RIDGE VENTS AND SOFFIT VENTS AS REQ'D BY CODE, 6p _8'-1011 SOFFIT HGT, TOP OF PLATE GALT SHIN( 6:12 PITCH SIDING 4ALT SHIN( 3:12 PITCH TOP OF WINDOW 1011 FRIEZE 5CAfRr->-/ HORIZONTAL SIDING STONE SILL MAIN FLOOR --------------- c:) a - - ---Ocl o S ONE VENEER L-11 �O ' -- - - FRONT ELEVATION 'B1 SCALE: 1/411= 1'-0" NOTE: PROVIDE FUTURE RAMP AS REQ'D 15'-4" >OFFIT PGT TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW_ �0 MAIN FLOOR t'' TAPERED DEC - SUPPORT COLUMN W/ 1ro11 BASE ON 24" MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER WRAPPED BASE LANDSCAPE WALL AS RE&D-VERIFY WITH GRADE TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW_ BOARD MAIN FLOOR , ACCORDING TO IRC WINDOW FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, SOME WINDOWS MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED, OR BE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED W/ A WINDOW FALL PREVENTION DEVICE, VERIFY W/ LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT. TOP OF PLATE — 501 1IT HGT. 10" FRIEZE BOARD ?OP OF WINDOW- MAIN FLOOR SCREEN PORCH TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW 4 O a+ TOP OF $LAB REAR ELEVATION 1B1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" pT vF�Rg1� ,I THE EVENT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS, ELEVATIONS, SND/OR DETAILS, THE CONTRACTOR / SUB -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ,HMANN DESIGN, INC.6 (319) 395- 9OO BEFORE CONSTRUCTION FOR :LARIFICATION, IF AHMANN DESIGN IS NOT CONTACTED, THE CONTRACTOR UB -CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY. AHMANN DESIGN INC. (319) 395-7900 w LLIW Lu z S) Q F- F -w z LU wff w4 wz�) n= -1z 0 Lu f - Z LL z 'q:3 p ww Ute() zN ww - q 37 �3LL Fu_ww0-Z q W O ~ N O Q w Q z Q i 4 LuW 10 W1-- Lu Qomao"Oo z N> z wWQw�WLu aq �mqlu �uzwzi O�w--I 4 F O g F i NR w w wOuwNwLL -a F- 0 LL w w` 0-wpOpQ' w OQ~El 00~00w u NQ-gNUz>-Q) ff w z w n- U z z uw°u�z�-o l'LL H w, Z r o 0 Q g W wQ' zw� Z q U� zoozzMWF- �i> q0 J) �nff z to �c) w (Y4 ozzoDzmo0 zooz(KOq-jz 4 1q��MD q izzLLiQQziff WN BY: MF ECKED BY: FINAL RELEASE: REVISIONS: NO, 21-01-100 2BI © COPYRIGHT 2021 AHMANN HOME PLANS INC. PROTECTED UNDER ARCHITECTURAL WORKS COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 TOP OF PLATE — SOI TOP OF WINDOW 10" FRIEZI S MAIN FLOOR — TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW T O m p TOP OF SLAB _8'-1011 SOFFIT HGT, TOP OF PLATE GALT SHIN( 6:12 PITCH SIDING 4ALT SHIN( 3:12 PITCH TOP OF WINDOW 1011 FRIEZE 5CAfRr->-/ HORIZONTAL SIDING STONE SILL MAIN FLOOR --------------- c:) a - - ---Ocl o S ONE VENEER L-11 �O ' -- - - FRONT ELEVATION 'B1 SCALE: 1/411= 1'-0" NOTE: PROVIDE FUTURE RAMP AS REQ'D 15'-4" >OFFIT PGT TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW_ �0 MAIN FLOOR t'' TAPERED DEC - SUPPORT COLUMN W/ 1ro11 BASE ON 24" MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER WRAPPED BASE LANDSCAPE WALL AS RE&D-VERIFY WITH GRADE TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW_ BOARD MAIN FLOOR , ACCORDING TO IRC WINDOW FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, SOME WINDOWS MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED, OR BE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED W/ A WINDOW FALL PREVENTION DEVICE, VERIFY W/ LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT. TOP OF PLATE — 501 1IT HGT. 10" FRIEZE BOARD ?OP OF WINDOW- MAIN FLOOR SCREEN PORCH TOP OF PLATE TOP OF WINDOW 4 O a+ TOP OF $LAB REAR ELEVATION 1B1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" pT vF�Rg1� ,I THE EVENT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS, ELEVATIONS, SND/OR DETAILS, THE CONTRACTOR / SUB -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ,HMANN DESIGN, INC.6 (319) 395- 9OO BEFORE CONSTRUCTION FOR :LARIFICATION, IF AHMANN DESIGN IS NOT CONTACTED, THE CONTRACTOR UB -CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY. AHMANN DESIGN INC. (319) 395-7900 w LLIW Lu z S) Q F- F -w z LU wff w4 wz�) n= -1z 0 Lu f - Z LL z 'q:3 p ww Ute() zN ww - q 37 �3LL Fu_ww0-Z q W O ~ N O Q w Q z Q i 4 LuW 10 W1-- Lu Qomao"Oo z N> z wWQw�WLu aq �mqlu �uzwzi O�w--I 4 F O g F i NR w w wOuwNwLL -a F- 0 LL w w` 0-wpOpQ' w OQ~El 00~00w u NQ-gNUz>-Q) ff w z w n- U z z uw°u�z�-o l'LL H w, Z r o 0 Q g W wQ' zw� Z q U� zoozzMWF- �i> q0 J) �nff z to �c) w (Y4 ozzoDzmo0 zooz(KOq-jz 4 1q��MD q izzLLiQQziff WN BY: MF ECKED BY: FINAL RELEASE: REVISIONS: NO, 21-01-100 2BI © COPYRIGHT 2021 AHMANN HOME PLANS INC. PROTECTED UNDER ARCHITECTURAL WORKS COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 FRAMING NOTES: I. 9'-I 1/8" WALL HEIGHT/UNLESS NOTED 2, WINDOW R.O. DO NOT INCLUDE TRANSOMS OR ARCH TOPS, 3, ROOF TRUSSES TO BE DESIGNED 3 CERTIFIED BY AN ENGINEER, LICENSED IN THE STATE OR REGION OF CONSTRUCTION, FOR ALL DEAD 8 LIVE LOADS. 4, ALL EXTERIOR WALLS 2X6's a 16" OX ALL INTERIOR WALLS 2X4's 'w 16" O.C. GARAGE WALLS 2X4's a 16" O.C. 5, MICROLAM BEAM E EXTERIOR HEAL SIZES TO BE VERIFIED BY SUPPLIER. 6, 2X6 PLUMBING WALLS AS REQ, MAIN FLOO ACCORDING TO IRC WINDOW FALL PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, SOME WINDOWS MAY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED, OR BE REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED W/ A WINDOW FALL PREVENTION DEVICE. VERIFY W/ LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT. MAIN FLOOR: 192 SQ. FT, SCREEN PORCH: 218 SQ, FT, NOTE: PROVIDE HEADERS FOR 3'-0" DOORS AS REQ'D VERIFY W/ CONTRACTOR FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHTS IN INCHES RESTROOMS: ACCESSIBLE STANDARD WATER CLOSET: TO TOP OF SEAT 18 15 44 URINAL: MAXIMUM TO BASIN OPENING 11 24 GRAB BARS: TO CENTER 33 - LAVATORIES: MINIMUM KNEE CLEARANCE: 2g - MAXIMUM TO TOP 34 - MIRRORS: MAXIMUM TO BOTTOM OF VIEWING SURFACE 40 - MINIMUM TO TOP 14 - SHELVES AND DISPENSERS: MAX, HT, TO CONTROL DEVICE 48 DRINKING FOUNTAINS - MAXIMUM TO SPOUT 3(0 40 SWITCHES AND CONTROLS - MAXIMUM TO CENTER 4& - ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATION RECEP. MIN. FROM BOTTOM OF DEVICE TO FLOOR 15 15 MOUNT ANY TOILET ROOM PAPER DISPENSERS 36" MAX. FROM REAR WALL. -LOCATE ELECT. PANEL BETWEEN 15" AND 54" ABOVE THE FLOOR -PROVIDE POWER AS REQUIRED FOR FURNACE,WATER HEATER, SUMP PUMP,ETC. -PROVIDE ELECTRICAL OUTLETS AS REQUIRED BY CODE ENERGY L,45ELS: WINDOW U -FACTOR VALUE: 0.25 HEATING SYSTEM EFFICIENCY: 93% SEER' OF THE COOLING SYSTEM: 14.5 WATER HEATER EFFICIENCY: .ZO (ENERGY FACTOR) AHMANN DESIGN INC. (319) 395-7900 W W Z N 4 (K N d O L W I'W Q W W _ O WT -4L ,o,a�Q=N H J O W W U W zN Wp��zQ�W LL U W W ? 4 w 0} W N 'vffz)--w0 p 4 W 4 z E= Q wW5pv'WoQ �olnLl LLo Wz 'zQ W zz w WN0 omw}v3wzi I(ILuo'wCoQ 0-1 Fp�Fw fYJW W W 0 U W N W J y m LL w W`��Wopoa'L W N �z��z�IK�� oa�00 oW� Lm WWoWffz4zz U w N U zU 0 LL H w LLLL z U) U J% °F0 00OWff ~ 0~ = Z W ly T LL z H Q u z 0 o Z Z= N F Q O N Q 4) to 0 IY a ozZoDzm0 zpOzfyp4�z QUU44~x[(13 Q iQLLa 0z=ff aaod�aa�o cj) CIL !L (2 !L AOR Cp1�STR��r v oR$ID GENERAL NOTES: 1, DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS / UNLESS NOTED TEMP, GLASS AS REQ. BY CODE, 2, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO INSURE THAT ALL PRODUCTS ARE INSTALLED PER MFR. RECOMMENDATIONS. 3, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND HVAC SUB -CONTRACTORS TO DESIGN/ BUILD THEIR SYSTEMS AND TO INSURE THAT THESE SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED AND OPERATING PROPERLY. 4, IT IS THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE THE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT AGAINST THE BUILD-UP OF MOISTURE OR MOLD, 5, CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REFERENCED HEREIN ARE FOR SCHEMATIC PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT COMPLY WITH YOUR LOCAL ZONING OR SAFETY REGULATIONS. OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CHOICE AND SELECTION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 6, SMOKE DETECTOR OS -1. VENT FAN 8, SMOKE/CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR CO 9, INTERIOR WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF STUDS, 10. EXTERIOR WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO OUTSIDE OF STUDS. IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND/OR DETAILS. THE CONTRACTOR / SUB -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT AHMANN DESIGN, INC.,@ (319) 395-1900 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION FOR CLARIFICATION. IF AHMANN DESIGN IS NOT CONTACTED, THE CONTRACTOR/ SUB -CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY. DRAWN BY: MF CHECKED BY: FINAL RELEASE: REVISIONS: JOB NO, 21-01-100 © COPYRIGHT 2021 AHMANN HOME PLANS INC. PROTECTED UNDER ARCHITECTURAL WORKS COPYRIGHT PROTECTION ACT OF 1990 FOUNDATION NOTES: I, 2,000 P.S,F. SOIL BEARING PRESSURE ASSUMED FOR FOOTING DESIGN. IF DIFFERENT CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED NOTIFY DESIGNER, 2. DO NOT BACKFILL BASEMENT WALLS UNTIL FIRST FLOOR IS IN PLACE, 3, 3,000 P,S,I, CONCRETE (TYPICAL) 4. DO NOT PLACE ANY FOOTINGS ON DISTURBED OR UNSTABLE SOIL - OVER EXCAVATE AND EXTEND FOOTING DEPTH, 5, CONCRETE WALL, FOOTING 8 PAD SIZES TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. REINFORCING SIZE 6 SPACING - BY OTHERS, 6, VERIFY DEPTH OF FROST FOOTINGS W/ LOCAL CODES, REGION AND SOIL BEARING, -1, PROVIDE TERMITE PROTECTION AS REQUIRED PER LOCAL CODE, 8, ACTUAL FLOOR JOIST LAYOUT 8 SPACING BY MFG, FRAMING NOTES: I, ALL INTERIOR WALLS 2X4's w 16" O,C, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 2, "MICROLAM" BEAM E EXTERIOR HEADER SIZES TO BE VERIFIED BY SUPPLIER, FSR C� DSS l�p� FpR g1 FOUNDATION FLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-O" m Q LANDSCAPE WALL AS REQ'D-VERIFY WITH GRADE DROP TOP OF' CONC, WALL 3'-8" Nt NOTE: r WIN. WELL B DRAINAGE AS REQ'D, BLOCK OUT CONC, FOR WINDOW O �Y tX xQ O d) 'Y 8'-4" 15'-84" -11-4 /411 2'-6" 5'-4\211 49� 2'-3/4" 2,-211 15'4 15'-0' �_ TREATED WOGD BEA _ —_--------__--_- -- 42" DEEP POST HOLE FT3, - FLAIR OUT BO TOM. VERIFY SIZE W/ ONTRACTOR 24'-0' 21'-1011 42" DEEP POST HOLE FTG, - FLAIR OUT BOTTOM, VERIFY SIZE W/ CONTRACTOR O ND LANDSCAPE WALL AS REQ'D-VERIFY WITH GRADE DROP TOP OF CONC, WALL 3'-8" ------------------------------- ------------------• ; ----------, I I I I RAISE GARAGE W44LLS 8 I I STOOP SLAB AS REQ'D FOR MIN, FRAMING SET 4" AGK ; STEP ENTRY I I I I I , FROM FACE OFCONCRETE NOTE: I I I I A Z I I I I O CONC, SLA5 W/ 6X6 - 10/10 W `— 4O W,M, OVER I 4" COMPACTED WIN, WELL 8 DRAINAGE I I ti} , 1 I I •� Y 1 Lu I ' N I I I I AS REQ'D, BLOCK O J� ' I I I I I I I I I - O SL I PE CONC, TOW RD O,H, DOOR 0 I N I OUT CONC. FOR WINDOW J,nY, ; O O 8"X48" GONG. WA L W/ 8"X48" CONC, WALL W/ U 16"XS" CONIC, FO c' (� LING 4'-0" 4'-0" DRAWN BY: MF I CHECKED BY: - $L-0CK OUT -FOR- ETH, DOOR-------- DOOR- - - - -1 1 I SLIDER I 3 O" 2X6 STUD WALL OVER i 32"X6 "8" CONC, WALL W/B/SHO ET ER LINEN 16" X 8" ONC, FTG, ; 2X6 STUD WALL OVER -1 8" CONC, WALL W/ \\\ 16" X 8" CONIC. FTG, ,, EDROOM #� _ 1 a �� •— ••— W O Q o 2x6 LU GING I < 21; j, -1,--15/411 24'-0" ~ IL > Q `V ® REC, ROOM tu z 0 mt�r N STU B IN FOR m�v 4" CONC. SLAB 4 1 2x4 B ARING LL O R FIX AS REQ'D (L 16"x ' CONC, F TIN 111121 "1 `v m�•r — •— • • / VAPOR BARRIER OVER `n •— ••— --•— �\\\� O ��\�\\�\\ r " COMPACTED GRAN, FILL, ' N • • 5111!21417 IPA � r �+j = z 2'-6" 4 0. 14-31/2" 1 V -6�/2° I 9'-9/4° 14'-23/411 - - S/ p I 2x4 BEARING W LL OVER 36°x 3(o°x 12" C(')I I 16"x 8" CONIC, F 0 ING CONC, FOOTING � N3 II la F_O S - M=L BEAM OR STEEL BEAM - _ co i (VffRIFY SIZE W% OTHERS) r � = z 4 ; HEAD HEADER m�`► GAME ROOM AS REQ'D AS REQ' t 9/411/1 11 elL, -5" �'-4" 13 -1" \!) 14'-23/411 Lu mA O ND LANDSCAPE WALL AS REQ'D-VERIFY WITH GRADE DROP TOP OF CONC, WALL 3'-8" ------------ ------- 1 a 4 v i D' 4 4 � v O O' 4 4 � v o a ID 4 ----------------------- I I I I NOTE: ------------------------------- ------------------• ; ----------, I I I I RAISE GARAGE W44LLS 8 I I STOOP SLAB AS REQ'D FOR MIN, FRAMING SET 4" AGK ; STEP ENTRY I I I I I , FROM FACE OFCONCRETE WAIS I I I I I I I I I UNEXCAVATED Z I I I I O CONC, SLA5 W/ 6X6 - 10/10 W I W,M, OVER I 4" COMPACTED aRAN. FILL, I I ti} , 1 I I •� Y 1 I � I ' N I I I I O J� ' I I I I I I I I I - O I I I I I SL I PE CONC, TOW RD O,H, DOOR 0 I I I 14 O J,nY, ; O O 8"X48" GONG. WA L W/ 8"X48" CONC, WALL W/ U 16"XS" CONIC, FO c' (� LING 16"XS" CONIC, OOTING I DRAWN BY: MF CHECKED BY: - $L-0CK OUT -FOR- ETH, DOOR-------- 6GCK ESI �T- FOR- O:H, DOOR- - - - -1 \\\ ,, , a �� •— ••— 111121 "1 — •— • • `�� lel •— ••— --•— �\\\� \\\� ��\�\\�\\ • • 5111!21417 IPA F14, ------------ ------- 1 a 4 v i D' 4 4 � v O O' 4 4 � v o a ID 4 ----------------------- I I I I NOTE: ------------------------------- ------------------• ; ----------, I I I I RAISE GARAGE W44LLS 8 I I STOOP SLAB AS REQ'D FOR MIN, FRAMING SET 4" AGK ; STEP ENTRY I I I I I , FROM FACE OFCONCRETE WAIS I I I I I I I I I UNEXCAVATED Z I I I I O CONC, SLA5 W/ 6X6 - 10/10 W I W,M, OVER I 4" COMPACTED aRAN. FILL, I I ti} , 1 I I •� Y 1 I � I ' N I I I I O J� ' I I I I I I I I I - O I I I I I SL I PE CONC, TOW RD O,H, DOOR 0 I I I 14 O J,nY, ; O O 8"X48" GONG. WA L W/ 8"X48" CONC, WALL W/ U 16"XS" CONIC, FO c' (� LING 16"XS" CONIC, OOTING I DRAWN BY: MF CHECKED BY: - $L-0CK OUT -FOR- ETH, DOOR-------- 6GCK ESI �T- FOR- O:H, DOOR- - - - -1 -8 2 9'-4/2" 1' -loll g,-4/2.1 24'-O" 49'-10" -------- ---------------- INTERIOR LEDGE ------------------• ; I FOR FLOOR SUPP RT ; I I I STOOP I I I I I I I I ------- COMPACTED F11 ------------------ L I I I I I I ----------------- o � ' - O v I 1 , ; ff o , D ' I Z v a v 4 v v a v . 4 v v a v . 4 v o NOTE: D -------- -------------------- --------------------- STRUCTURE TO BE PROVIDED FOR COLUMN 4 SUPPORT -s STOOP. VERIFY METHOD W/ CONTRACTOR, 0 I v O I I o ; 0 D 6'-11/4'1 �1-3,211 LOUJER LEVEL FINISH: 1505 SQ, fit, (NOT INCLUDING STORAGE) GENERAL NOTES: I, 9'-0 1/2" CEILING HGT, 2, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO INSURE THAT ALL PRODUCTS ARE INSTALLED PER MFR. RECOMMENDATIONS, 3, IT IS THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE THE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT AGAINST THE BUILD-UP OF MOISTURE OR MOLD, 4, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PLUMBING, ELECTRICAL AND HVAC SUB -CONTRACTORS TO DESIGN/ BUILD THEIR SYSTEMS AND TO INSURE THAT THESE SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED AND OPERATING PROPERLY. 5. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REFERENCED HEREIN ARE FOR SCHEMATIC PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT O COMPLY WITH YOUR LOCAL ZONING OR SAFETY 4[1 REGULATIONS, OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CHOICE AND SELECTION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. 6. SMOKE DETECTOR O Z, VENT FAN ® S/ 8, SMOKE/CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR CO 9, INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTER OF STUDS, 10, BASEMENT SASH WINDOWS AS REQ'D BY LOCAL CODE - VERIFY SIZE 6 LOCATION W/ CONTRACTOR, 11, FURR OUT AND INSULATE BASEMENT WALLS AS REQ'D BY LOCAL CODES, 12, Z' -O" MIN, CEILING HGT, / 6'-8" MIN, TO UNDERSIDE OF BEAMS, DUCTS, ETC, IN THE EVENT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND/OR DETAILS. THE CONTRACTOR / SUB -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT AHMANN DESIGN, ING.6 (319) 395-1900 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION FOR CLARIFICATION. IF AHMANN DESIGN IS NOT CONTACTED, THE CONTRACTOR/ SUB -CONTRACTOR WILL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY, AHMANN DESIGN INC. (319) 395-7900 W WN 4IK T N d 0 N W ff W 4 W . m _ O W R W ~ cpH4�4�cN _joWWoW _-mi4= ,L U W W C) F Qo}�ow WN �u ff 7)_ ° 4W Q z If= Q WW_j°�Wo° Qomu-0 o z N> z wWZWVWE4 F p 4 F N ff J W W W03:W N W J y m O 3:LLWow W`�ulWo°oaf W N Z F- 0400oW- �(LQNUZ_�Nm U w N U p ILLiHwI�LZNU�ID 4 Z0Zz Q Z O Z= f N f) Z4LL n O N 4 4) ff F—Wa �zZ0Nzm0N zpOz�4Hz z U U 4 4 9 � W 3 4 izz_i4pz=ff 4404�44�� 00 REVISIONS: JOB NO, 21-01 X00 © GOPI'RICxHT 2021 AI-IMANN I-IOME PL�4NS INC. PROTECTED UNDER ARGI-41TEGTURAL WORKS GOPYRICsHT PROTECTION AGT OF 1990 _O U ff Z O U 1J— n OvJ �0 O vJ O J� Q J,nY, V Q DRAWN BY: MF CHECKED BY: FINAL RELEASE: REVISIONS: JOB NO, 21-01 X00 © GOPI'RICxHT 2021 AI-IMANN I-IOME PL�4NS INC. PROTECTED UNDER ARGI-41TEGTURAL WORKS GOPYRICsHT PROTECTION AGT OF 1990 Introduction The Hickory Trail Estates development will consist of 120 continuing care retirement community (CCRC) units and 55 single-family residences. The development is located south of Scott Boulevard and west of N 1 st Avenue. The development will construct a connection through the development that will connect Scott Boulevard to N 1 St Avenue through Hickory Trail. The development will be constructed and fully occupied by 2025. Methodology The trip generation for the Hickory Trail Estates and the Oaknoll East Retirement Community is calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10`h Edition (2017). The average trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 255, continuing care retirement community (CCRC) and LUC 210, single-family detached residential, have been used. The intersection of N 1 St Avenue at Scott Boulevard is not being analyzed as part of this report as it is planned to be upgraded with a City project to a roundabout. The following intersections are being analyzed as part of this report: 1. N Pt Avenue at Hickory Trail — Two-way Stop Controlled 2. Oaknoll East/Site Access at Scott Blvd — Two-way Stop Controlled The development is expected to be fully built out and occupied by the year 2025; therefore, the year 2025 was used for future analysis. The analysis has been performed for the existing conditions, 2025 baseline conditions, and 2025 future with development conditions during the AM and PM peak -hours. Existing counts were collected by AXIOM, on Thursday, January 7, 2021 for the AM and Tuesday, January 12, 2021 for the PM at the intersection of N 1 st Avenue at Hickory Trail. Traffic volumes are impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the traffic volumes have been increased by a 35% during the AM peak -hour and 30% during the PM peak -hour. This was determined based on non-COVID-19 counts at the intersection of N 1St Avenue at Scott Boulevard and comparing link volumes between the intersections. The 2025 baseline turning movements were calculated by applying an annually compounding growth rate of 1% to the normalized existing turning volumes. The I% growth rate is based on conversations with Iowa City staff. The 2025 future with development turning movements have been calculated by adding the development's trips to the 2025 baseline turning movements. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue • Suite B • Everett WA, 98201 Tel: 425-339-8266 • Fax: 425-258-2922 • E-mail: info@gibsontraffic.com Hickory Trail Estates Traffic Impact Analysis The peak -hour level of service (LOS) analysis calculations were completed using the Synchro 10 software. This software applies the operational analysis methodology of the current Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Traffic congestion is generally measured in terms of level of service. In accordance with the HCM 6th Edition, road facilities and intersections are rated between LOS A and LOS F, with LOS A being free flow and LOS F being forced flow or over -capacity conditions. The level of service criteria is summarized in Table 1. The level of service at two-way stop -controlled intersections is based on the average delay of the worst approach. The level of service at signalized and all -way stop -controlled intersections is based on the average delay for all approaches. Geometric characteristics and conflicting traffic movements are taken into consideration when determining level of service values. Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Level of 1 Service Expected Delay Intersection Control Delay Seconds er Vehicle Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersections A Little/No Delay <10 <10 B Short Delays >10 and <15 >10 and <20 C Average Delays >15 and <25 >20 and <35 D Long Delays >25 and <35 >35 and <55 E Very Long Delays >35 and <50 >55 and <80 F Extreme Delays2 >50 >80 The acceptable level of service for intersections within Iowa City is LOS C/D and the significance of impacts on intersections operating at LOS E or LOS F is taken on a case-by-case basis. 1 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 0 Edition. LOS A: Free-flow traffic conditions, with minimal delay to stopped vehicles (no vehicle is delayed longer than one cycle at signalized intersection). LOS B: Generally stable traffic flow conditions. LOS C: Occasional back-ups may develop, but delay to vehicles is short term and still tolerable. LOS D: During short periods of the peak hour, delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial but are tolerable during times of less demand (i.e. vehicles delayed one cycle or less at signal). LOS E: Intersections operate at or near capacity, with long queues developing on all approaches and long delays. LOS F: Jammed conditions on all approaches with excessively long delays and vehicles unable to move at times. 2 When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2021 infoggibsontraffic.com 2 GTC #21-005 Hickory Trail Estates Traffic Impact Analysis TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Trip generation calculations for the Hickory Trail Estates are based on national statistics contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition (2017). The average trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 255, continuing care retirement community (CCRC) and LUC 210, single-family detached residential, have been used. There are total of 120 CCRC units and 55 single-family residences. The Hickory Trail Estates is anticipated to generate 808 new daily trips, 58 new AM peak -hour trips and 74 new PM peak -hour trips. The trip generation is summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Trip Generation Summary The trip generation calculations are included in the attachments. The Oaknoll East development on the north side of Scott Boulevard is not occupied so the trip generation was estimated for the access opposite the proposed site access by using LUC 255 for 56 units. This generated 8 AM peak -hour trips (5 Inbound/3 Outbound) and 9 PM peak -hour trips (4 Inbound/5 Outbound). These trips were distributed on Scott Boulevard based on the roadway traffic split of 55% to/from the west and 45% to/from the east. Trip distribution and traffic assignments for the development are based on the existing turning movement counts and the splits between Scott Boulevard and N 1St Avenue. It is anticipated that 45% of the development traffic would travel to and from the west on Scott Boulevard and 15% to and from the east of N 1St Avenue on Scott Boulevard. The remaining 40% would travel to and from the south on N 1St Avenue from Hickory Trail. The development trips are included in the turning movement sheets for the AM and PM peak -hours. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2021 infoggibsontraffic.com 3 GTC #21-005 Average Daily Trips AM Peak -Hour Trips PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Uses Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Generation 2.40 Trips per Unit 0.14 Trips per Unit 0.16 Trips per Unit LUC 255, Rate CCRC Splits 50% 50% 100% 65% 35% 100% 39% 61% 1�0 120 Units Trips 144 144 288 11 6 17 7 12 19 LUC 210, Generation 9.44 Trips per Unit 0.75 Trips per Unit 0.99 Trips per Unit Single Rate Family Splits 50% 50% 100% 25% 75% 100% 63% 37% 100 Dwelling,%55 Units Trips 260 260 520 10 31 41 35 20 55 TOTAL 404 404 808 21 37 58 42 32 74 The trip generation calculations are included in the attachments. The Oaknoll East development on the north side of Scott Boulevard is not occupied so the trip generation was estimated for the access opposite the proposed site access by using LUC 255 for 56 units. This generated 8 AM peak -hour trips (5 Inbound/3 Outbound) and 9 PM peak -hour trips (4 Inbound/5 Outbound). These trips were distributed on Scott Boulevard based on the roadway traffic split of 55% to/from the west and 45% to/from the east. Trip distribution and traffic assignments for the development are based on the existing turning movement counts and the splits between Scott Boulevard and N 1St Avenue. It is anticipated that 45% of the development traffic would travel to and from the west on Scott Boulevard and 15% to and from the east of N 1St Avenue on Scott Boulevard. The remaining 40% would travel to and from the south on N 1St Avenue from Hickory Trail. The development trips are included in the turning movement sheets for the AM and PM peak -hours. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2021 infoggibsontraffic.com 3 GTC #21-005 Hickory Trail Estates Level of Service Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis The existing channelization at the study intersections as well as the existing peak -hour factors were utilized in determining the level of service analysis. The turning movements are included in the attachments. The level of service analysis for the normalized existing, 2025 baseline, and 2025 future with development conditions is summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Time period Normalized Existing Conditions 2025 Baseline Conditions 2025 Future With Development Conditions LOS I Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay 1. N 1st Avenue at AM D 25.4 sec D 26.4 sec D 29.3 sec PM C 18.5 sec C 19.5 sec C 21.3 sec Hickory Trail 1. Oaknoll East/Site Access at AM C 18.6 sec C 20.3 sec D 33.9 sec PM C 20.1 sec C 22.0 sec D 34.1 sec Scott Boulevard The study intersection is expected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better in the normalized existing, 2025 baseline and 2025 future with development conditions during both the AM and PM peak -hours. Collision Data Collision Data was compiled for the years 2018 through 2020 from the Iowa DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool for the intersection of N 1St Avenue at Hickory Trail and along Scott Boulevard in the vicinity of the Site access. There were two collisions (one rear -end and one sideswipe) at the intersection of N 1St Avenue and Hickory Trail. The collisions resulted in property damage and possible injury. In the approximate location of the access to Scott Boulevard there was one rear -end collision that resulted in a suspected minor injury. At both locations there was no collision trend or significant collision history associated with the geometry of the road network. The detailed crash reports are included in the attachments. Channelization Warrant Channelization analysis was performed determine if left -turn channelization is warranted on Scott Boulevard. The left -turn channelization requirements at the intersection have been evaluated using the WSDOT Design Manual. The left -turn channelization has been evaluated using Exhibit 1310- 7a Left -Turn Storage Guidelines: Two -Lane Unsignalized. The analysis shows that the small number of left -turns does not reach the percentage threshold for requiring a dedicated pocket. It should be noted that there is sufficient roadway width to restripe the roadway to provide a left -turn pocket if it becomes warranted in the future. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2021 infoggibsontraffic.com 4 GTC #21-005 Hickory Trail Estates Traffic Impact Analysis Attachments Trip Generation A-1 to A-10 Counts B-1 to B-3 Turning Movements C-1 to C-6 Level of Service Calculations D-1 to D-12 Collision Data E-1 to E-2 Channelization Warrant F-1 Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2021 infoggibsontraffic.com 5 GTC #21-005 w - l k \ \ U) Z LU LU Z \ 0 $ o 0 \ §z_ § 0 0 0 Z g ° ® ( LU § P CL a 0 0 0 m § k '6 \ / § LU w ® } @ E G k §2 ®mP�e f/ o 0 0 £P w § � § 2 _ LU§ ° « z 2 0 F- k(D m k 0 \ \ § i L m CL2 J « R a ,0 Lu " k k \ \ § o } ° @ E G 2-k/ooc \ ) f F- U) �J20 CL - 2 §F- = y \ \ 2 \ \ \ F ®§ \\ 0 D ®� \\ w - l \ 7 CD ± o A �J G 5 @ \ o a\R 2 § LU Z £- z / / \ k§z % k = 0 0 0 g ° LU LU co k � \ o § k / \ E S ® z + ° } \ a z0 x m § § / 0 0 z w z § k / LL L ® 7 )0 ° b = Q 2x 22�co ) ƒ % 7 @ / + �\k/cc ) § f k § / y �o00 - , 2�F- / 7 @ + ®§ \\ _ \|��° E o ° %-2 w -a 9 a G \ § o c \ Q LU Z £ //f z r §§z q z o 0 0 g a LU co k o o c � 0 2 0 0 0 /k/@\G LU z f F- (:6 � / / k zLLJ a xU) 00 }� 0 0 z w z o Lu / � . �j\� LU r- [ °0 0 2 ca U,�$ } 2 %«Raa 2 WF - k+ 0 ° / J _ 0 7F k U) % a \ F f c 22 � �k0U)rLIN w § C c c k ® k/=�� f/ r» U) iw a R \ § �o Cl) \ ®� \\ « � o �2 c CD o LU LO 52 �2 qa E-j§64� a� CL m � m - - \\ \ �� 0 - (D § } > } 2 � e # ƒ S § f 2 § \ƒ� w -a Hickory Trail Estates GTC #21-005 AM Peak -Hour A-4 New ADT New AM Peak Hour Trips In IOut Total 100% 807.201 21.101 36.4011 57.50 1% 8.07 0.21 0.36 0.58 2% 16.14 0.42 0.73 1.15 3% 24.22 0.63 1.09 1.73 4% 32.29 0.84 1.46 2.30 5% 40.36 1.06 1.82 2.88 6% 48.431 1.27 2.18 3.45 7% 56.50 1.48 2.55 4.03 8% 64.58 1.69 2.91 4.60 9% 72.65 1.90 3.28 5.18 10% 80.72 2.11 3.64 5.75 11% 88.79 2.32 4.00 6.33 12% 96.861 2.53 4.37 6.90 13% 104.94 2.74 4.73 7.48 14% 113.01 2.95 5.10 8.05 15% 121.08 3.17 5.46 8.63 16% 129.15 3.38 5.82 9.20 17% 137.22 3.59 6.19 9.78 18%1 145.30 3.80 6.55 10.35 19% 153.37 4.01 6.92 10.93 20% 161.44 4.22 7.28 11.50 21% 169.51 4.43 7.64 12.08 22% 177.58 4.64 8.01 12.65 23% 185.66 4.85 8.37 13.23 24% 193.73 5.06 8.74 13.80 25% 201.80 5.28 9.10 14.38 26% 209.87 5.49 9.46 14.95 27% 217.94 5.70 9.83 15.53 28% 226.02 5.91 10.19 16.10 29% 234.09 6.12 10.56 16.68 30% 242.16 6.33 10.92 17.25 31% 250.23 6.54 11.28 17.83 32% 258.30 6.75 11.65 18.40 33% 266.38 6.96 12.01 18.98 34% 274.45 7.17 12.38 19.55 35% 282.52 7.39 12.74 20.13 36% 290.59 7.60 13.10 20.70 37% 298.66 7.81 13.47 21.28 38% 306.74 8.02 13.83 21.85 39% 314.81 8.23 14.20 22.43 40% 322.88 8.44 14.56 23.00 41% 330.95 8.65 14.92 23.58 42% 339.02 8.86 15.29 24.15 43% 347.10 9.07 15.65 24.73 44% 355.17 9.28 16.02 25.30 45% 363.24 9.50 16.38 25.88 46% 371.31 9.71 16.74 26.45 47% 379.38 9.92 17.11 27.03 48% 387.461 10.13 17.47 27.60 49%1 395.531 10.34 17.84 28.18 500/ 403.601 10.55 18.20 28.75 A-4 New ADT New AM In I Peak Hour Trips Out 11 Total 100% 807.20 21.101 36.4011 57.50 51% 411.67 10.76 18.56 29.33 52% 419.74 10.97 18.93 29.90 53% 427.82 11.18 19.29 30.48 54% 435.89 11.39 19.66 31.05 55% 443.96 11.61 20.02 31.63 56%1 452.03 11.821 20.38 32.20 57% 460.10 12.03 20.75 32.78 58% 468.18 12.24 21.11 33.35 59% 476.25 12.45 21.48 33.93 60% 484.32 12.66 21.84 34.50 61% 492.39 12.87 22.20 35.08 62%1 500.46 13.081 22.57 35.65 63% 508.54 13.29 22.93 36.23 64% 516.61 13.50 23.30 36.80 65% 524.68 13.72 23.66 37.38 66% 532.75 13.93 24.02 37.95 67% 540.82 14.14 24.39 38.53 68%1 548.90 14.351 24.75 39.10 69% 556.97 14.56 25.12 39.68 70% 565.04 14.77 25.48 40.25 71% 573.11 14.98 25.84 40.83 72% 581.18 15.19 26.21 41.40 73% 589.26 15.40 26.57 41.98 74%1 597.33 15.611 26.94 42.55 75% 605.40 15.83 27.30 43.13 76% 613.47 16.04 27.66 43.70 77% 621.54 16.25 28.03 44.28 78% 629.62 16.46 28.39 44.85 79% 637.69 16.67 28.76 45.43 800/ 645.76 16.881 29.12 46.00 81% 653.83 17.09 29.481 46.58 82% 661.90 17.30 29.85 47.15 83% 669.98 17.51 30.21 47.73 84% 678.05 17.72 30.58 48.30 85% 686.12 17.94 30.94 48.88 86% 694.19 18.15 31.30 49.45 87% 702.26 18.36 31.671 50.03 88% 710.34 18.57 32.03 50.60 89% 718.41 18.78 32.40 51.18 90% 726.48 18.99 32.76 51.75 91% 734.55 19.20 33.12 52.33 92% 742.62 19.41 33.49 52.90 93% 750.70 19.62 33.851 53.48 94% 758.77 19.83 34.22 54.05 95% 766.84 20.05 34.58 54.63 96% 774.91 20.26 34.94 55.20 97% 782.98 20.47 35.31 55.78 98% 791.06 20.68 35.67 56.35 99% 799.13 20.89 36.0456.93 100°/ 807.20 21.10 36.40 57.50 A-4 Hickory Trail Estates GTC #21-005 PM Peak -Hour A-5 New ADT New PM Peak Hour Trips In IOut Total 100% 807.201 41.791 31.8611 73.65 1% 8.07 0.42 0.32 0.74 2% 16.14 0.84 0.64 1.47 3% 24.22 1.25 0.96 2.21 4% 32.29 1.67 1.27 2.95 5% 40.36 2.09 1.59 3.68 6% 48.431 2.51 1.91 4.42 7% 56.50 2.93 2.23 5.16 8% 64.58 3.34 2.55 5.89 9% 72.65 3.76 2.87 6.63 10% 80.72 4.18 3.19 7.37 11% 88.79 4.60 3.50 8.10 12% 96.861 5.01 3.82 8.84 13% 104.94 5.43 4.14 9.57 14% 113.01 5.85 4.46 10.31 15% 121.08 6.27 4.78 11.05 16% 129.15 6.69 5.10 11.78 17% 137.22 7.10 5.42 12.52 18%1 145.30 7.52 5.73 13.26 19% 153.37 7.94 6.05 13.99 20% 161.44 8.36 6.37 14.73 21% 169.51 8.78 6.69 15.47 22% 177.58 9.19 7.01 16.20 23% 185.66 9.61 7.33 16.94 24% 193.73 10.03 7.65 17.68 25% 201.80 10.45 7.97 18.41 26% 209.87 10.87 8.28 19.15 27% 217.94 11.28 8.60 19.89 28% 226.02 11.70 8.92 20.62 29% 234.09 12.12 9.24 21.36 30% 242.16 12.54 9.56 22.10 31% 250.23 12.95 9.88 22.83 32% 258.30 13.37 10.20 23.57 33% 266.38 13.79 10.51 24.30 34% 274.45 14.21 10.83 25.04 35% 282.52 14.63 11.15 25.78 36% 290.59 15.04 11.47 26.51 37% 298.66 15.46 11.79 27.25 38% 306.74 15.88 12.11 27.99 39% 314.81 16.30 12.43 28.72 40% 322.88 16.72 12.74 29.46 41% 330.95 17.13 13.06 30.20 42% 339.02 17.55 13.38 30.93 43% 347.10 17.97 13.70 31.67 44% 355.17 18.39 14.02 32.41 45% 363.24 18.81 14.34 33.14 46% 371.31 19.22 14.66 33.88 47% 379.38 19.64 14.97 34.62 48% 387.461 20.06 15.29 35.35 49%1 395.531 20.48 15.61 36.09 500/ 403.601 20.90 15.93 36.83 A-5 New ADT New PM In I Peak Hour Trips Out 11 Total 100% 807.20 41.791 31.8611 73.65 51% 411.67 21.31 16.25 37.56 52% 419.74 21.73 16.57 38.30 53% 427.82 22.15 16.89 39.03 54% 435.89 22.57 17.20 39.77 55% 443.96 22.98 17.52 40.51 56%1 452.03 23.401 17.84 41.24 57% 460.10 23.82 18.16 41.98 58% 468.18 24.24 18.48 42.72 59% 476.25 24.66 18.80 43.45 60% 484.32 25.07 19.12 44.19 61% 492.39 25.49 19.43 44.93 62%1 500.46 25.911 19.75 45.66 63% 508.54 26.33 20.07 46.40 64% 516.61 26.75 20.39 47.14 65% 524.68 27.16 20.71 47.87 66% 532.75 27.58 21.03 48.61 67% 540.82 28.00 21.35 49.35 68%1 548.90 28.421 21.66 50.08 69% 556.97 28.84 21.98 50.82 70% 565.04 29.25 22.30 51.56 71% 573.11 29.67 22.62 52.29 72% 581.18 30.09 22.94 53.03 73% 589.26 30.51 23.26 53.76 74%1 597.33 30.921 23.58 54.50 75% 605.40 31.34 23.90 55.24 76% 613.47 31.76 24.21 55.97 77% 621.54 32.18 24.53 56.71 78% 629.62 32.60 24.85 57.45 79% 637.69 33.01 25.17 58.18 800/ 645.76 33.431 25.49 58.92 81% 653.83 33.85 25.811 59.66 82% 661.90 34.27 26.13 60.39 83% 669.98 34.69 26.44 61.13 84% 678.05 35.10 26.76 61.87 85% 686.12 35.52 27.08 62.60 86% 694.19 35.94 27.40 63.34 87% 702.26 36.36 27.721 64.08 88% 710.34 36.78 28.04 64.81 89% 718.41 37.19 28.36 65.55 90% 726.48 37.61 28.67 66.29 91% 734.55 38.03 28.99 67.02 92% 742.62 38.45 29.31 67.76 93% 750.70 38.86 29.631 68.49 94% 758.77 39.28 29.95 69.23 95% 766.84 39.70 30.27 69.97 96% 774.91 40.12 30.59 70.70 97% 782.98 40.54 30.90 71.44 98% 791.06 40.95 31.22 72.18 99% 799.13 41.37 31.54 72.91 100°/ 807.20 41.79 31.86 73.65 A-5 I 0 \ M A-6 02 °1.0 2 2 w 2 2 LU Z § k§§_ k k 0 0 g ° 0 L0 ( � = 0 0 F- IL m / § o 0 \ \ + £L� F- �= 0 0 0 LLI U) § \ X § LU § _ 77 F -g LLI§2 z °fa « w 22FcO j 0 \ § Ink ƒ L m § z 2 \�\\ 0 + - \ \ e � 77 E k / o c ) 0 f k / £�o§fy ® 7 �F- k/\\ f / 7 F- ( ®o \ F- { \ ®z \ � CL o 21 . o f ^ $ ��]\ LU§ \ $ A % ■ � ¢ @ \k > 0 E § m [ k D 2 D \� / \ - \ 0 A-6 U) 0 0 U Co U) o wo � Q N E ~ � 2 O ~ U) U W M CD �� 0 3: 3: A-7 U) 0 UCo 4 U) \ /cm) E / / 2 I 0 \ ±� w M 0 = 0 0 _ § q a I a ca m 2 £ / / 0 § 0m k 2 � x 0.2 \ LU ) G | E § C'4 w - S 5 \ \ k 2 r r Z LU m a Id: k k n r $ §( J o 0 z�M _ 2 0. § J o 0 F- 0 2 a.£ c o § k f 2 7 7 \ z �L 0000 « & x U)LU 0 a z Lu P g� w z Z U 2 ° « \ 21.071, @ Lu F- § +F- m cn /x. 2 4 F- F- CD 7- 0 0") io<-N+-- =L t M o — 0 0 ) \ } k k / _ ®® o § / ®oma f/mc �L % e w ®q \ F - d@ CD z \ m 0.2 \ LU ) G | E § C'4 w - S Hickory Trail Estates GTC #21-005 Oaknoll East/Hampstead Woods AM Peak -Hour A-9 New ADT New AM Peak Hour Trips In Out Total 100% 134.401 5.101 2.7411 2.7411 7.84 1 % 1.34 0.05 0.03 1.40 0.08 2% 2.69 0.10 0.05 1.42 0.16 3% 4.03 0.15 0.08 1.45 0.24 4% 5.38 0.20 0.11 1.48 0.31 5% 6.72 0.26 0.14 1.51 0.39 6% 8.061 0.31 0.16 1.53 0.47 7% 9.41 0.36 0.19 1.56 0.55 8% 10.75 0.41 0.22 1.59 0.63 9% 12.10 0.46 0.25 1.62 0.71 10% 13.44 0.51 0.27 1.64 0.78 11% 14.78 0.56 0.30 1.67 0.86 12% 16.131 0.61 0.33 1.70 0.94 13% 17.47 0.66 0.36 1.73 1.02 14% 18.82 0.71 0.38 1.75 1.10 15% 20.16 0.77 0.41 1.78 1.18 16% 21.50 0.82 0.44 1.81 1.25 17% 22.85 0.87 0.47 1.84 1.33 18% 24.191 0.92 0.49 1.86 1.41 19% 25.54 0.97 0.52 1.89 1.49 20% 26.88 1.02 0.55 1.92 1.57 21% 28.22 1.07 0.58 1.95 1.65 22% 29.57 1.12 0.60 1.97 1.72 23% 30.91 1.17 0.63 2.00 1.80 24% 32.261 1.22 0.66 2.03 1.88 25% 33.60 1.28 0.69 2.06 1.96 26% 34.94 1.33 0.71 2.08 2.04 27% 36.29 1.38 0.74 2.11 2.12 28% 37.63 1.43 0.77 2.14 2.20 29% 38.98 1.48 0.79 2.16 2.27 30% 40.321 1.53 0.82 2.19 2.35 31% 41.66 1.58 0.85 2.22 2.43 32% 43.01 1.63 0.88 2.25 2.51 33% 44.35 1.68 0.90 2.27 2.59 34% 45.70 1.73 0.93 2.30 2.67 35% 47.04 1.79 0.96 2.33 2.74 36%1 48.38 1.841 0.99 2.361 2.82 37% 49.73 1.89 1.01 2.38 2.90 38% 51.07 1.94 1.04 2.41 2.98 39% 52.42 1.99 1.07 2.44 3.06 40% 53.76 2.04 1.10 2.47 3.14 41% 55.10 2.09 1.12 2.49 3.21 42% 56.45 2.14 1.15 2.52 3.29 43% 57.79 2.19 1.18 2.55 3.37 44% 59.14 2.24 1.21 2.58 3.45 45% 60.48 2.30 1.23 2.60 3.53 46% 61.82 2.35 1.26 2.63 3.61 47% 63.17 2.40 1.29 2.66 3.68 48% 64.51 2.45 1.32 2.69 3.76 49% 65.86 2.50 1.34 2.71 3.84 50% 67.20 2.55 1.37 2.74 3.92 A-9 New ADT New AM In I Peak Hour Trips Out 11 Total 100% 134.40 5.101 2.7411 7.84 51% 68.54 2.60 1.40 4.00 52% 69.89 2.65 1.42 4.08 53% 71.23 2.70 1.45 4.16 54% 72.58 2.75 1.48 4.23 55% 73.92 2.81 1.51 4.31 56%1 75.26 2.861 1.53 4.39 57% 76.61 2.91 1.56 4.47 58% 77.95 2.96 1.59 4.55 59% 79.30 3.01 1.62 4.63 60% 80.64 3.06 1.64 4.70 61% 81.98 3.11 1.67 4.78 62%1 83.33 3.161 1.70 4.86 63% 84.67 3.21 1.73 4.94 64% 86.02 3.26 1.75 5.02 65% 87.36 3.32 1.78 5.10 66% 88.70 3.37 1.81 5.17 67% 90.05 3.42 1.84 5.25 68%1 91.39 3.47 1.86 5.33 69% 92.74 3.52 1.89 5.41 70% 94.08 3.57 1.92 5.49 71% 95.42 3.62 1.95 5.57 72% 96.77 3.67 1.97 5.64 73% 98.11 3.72 2.00 5.72 74%1 99.46 3.77 2.03 5.80 75% 100.80 3.83 2.06 5.88 76% 102.14 3.88 2.08 5.96 77% 103.49 3.93 2.11 6.04 78% 104.83 3.98 2.14 6.12 79% 106.18 4.03 2.16 6.19 80% 107.52 4.08 2.19 6.27 81% 108.86 4.131 2.22 6.35 82% 110.21 4.18 2.25 6.43 83% 111.55 4.23 2.27 6.51 84% 112.90 4.28 2.30 6.59 85%1 114.24 4.34 2.33 6.66 86% 115.58 4.39 2.361 6.74 87% 116.93 4.44 2.38 6.82 88% 118.27 4.49 2.41 6.90 89% 119.62 4.54 2.44 6.98 90% 120.96 4.59 2.47 7.06 91% 122.30 4.641 2.49 7.13 92% 123.65 4.69 2.52 7.21 93% 124.99 4.74 2.55 7.29 94% 126.34 4.79 2.58 7.37 95% 127.68 4.85 2.60 7.45 96% 129.02 4.90 2.63 7.53 97% 130.37 4.95 2.66 7.60 98% 131.71 5.00 2.69 7.68 99% 133.06 5.05 2.71 7.76 100% 134.40 5.10 2.74 7.84 A-9 Hickory Trail Estates GTC #21-005 Oaknoll East/Hampstead Woods PM Peak -Hour A-10 New ADT New PM Peak Hour Trips In IOut Total 100% 134.401 3.491 5.4711 8.96 1% 1.34 0.03 0.05 0.09 2% 2.69 0.07 0.11 0.18 3% 4.03 0.10 0.16 0.27 4% 5.38 0.14 0.22 0.36 5% 6.72 0.17 0.27 0.45 6% 8.061 0.21 0.33 0.54 7% 9.41 0.24 0.38 0.63 8% 10.75 0.28 0.44 0.72 9% 12.10 0.31 0.49 0.81 10% 13.44 0.35 0.55 0.90 11% 14.78 0.38 0.60 0.99 12% 16.131 0.42 0.66 1.08 13% 17.47 0.45 0.71 1.16 14% 18.82 0.49 0.77 1.25 15% 20.16 0.52 0.82 1.34 16% 21.50 0.56 0.88 1.43 17% 22.85 0.59 0.93 1.52 18% 24.191 0.63 0.98 1.61 19% 25.54 0.66 1.04 1.70 20% 26.88 0.70 1.09 1.79 21% 28.22 0.73 1.15 1.88 22% 29.57 0.77 1.20 1.97 23% 30.91 0.80 1.26 2.06 24% 32.261 0.84 1.31 2.15 25% 33.60 0.87 1.37 2.24 26% 34.94 0.91 1.42 2.33 27% 36.29 0.94 1.48 2.42 28% 37.63 0.98 1.53 2.51 29% 38.98 1.01 1.59 2.60 30% 40.321 1.05 1.64 2.69 31% 41.66 1.081 1.70 2.78 32% 43.01 1.12 1.75 2.87 33% 44.35 1.15 1.81 2.96 34% 45.70 1.19 1.86 3.05 35% 47.04 1.22 1.91 3.14 36% 48.381 1.26 1.97 3.23 37% 49.73 1.29 2.02 3.32 38% 51.07 1.33 2.08 3.40 39% 52.42 1.36 2.13 3.49 40% 53.76 1.40 2.19 3.58 41% 55.10 1.43 2.24 3.67 42%1 56.45 1.471 2.30 3.76 43% 57.79 1.50 2.35 3.85 44% 59.14 1.54 2.41 3.94 45% 60.48 1.57 2.46 4.03 46% 61.82 1.61 2.52 4.12 47% 63.171 1.64 2.57 4.21 48% 64.51 1.68 2.63 4.30 49% 65.86 1.71 2.68 4.39 50°/ 67.20 1.75 2.74 4.48 A-10 New ADT New PM Peak Hour Trips In I Out 11 Total 100% 134.40 3.491 5.4711 8.96 51% 68.54 1.78 2.79 4.57 52% 69.89 1.81 2.84 4.66 53% 71.23 1.85 2.90 4.75 54% 72.58 1.88 2.95 4.84 55% 73.92 1.92 3.01 4.93 56%1 75.26 1.951 3.06 5.02 57% 76.61 1.99 3.12 5.11 58% 77.95 2.02 3.17 5.20 59% 79.30 2.06 3.23 5.29 60% 80.64 2.09 3.28 5.38 61% 81.98 2.13 3.34 5.47 62%1 83.33 2.161 3.39 5.56 63% 84.67 2.20 3.45 5.64 64% 86.02 2.23 3.50 5.73 65% 87.36 2.27 3.56 5.82 66% 88.70 2.30 3.61 5.91 67% 90.05 2.34 3.66 6.00 68%1 91.39 2.371 3.72 6.09 69% 92.74 2.41 3.77 6.18 70% 94.08 2.44 3.83 6.27 71% 95.42 2.48 3.88 6.36 72% 96.77 2.51 3.94 6.45 73% 98.11 2.55 3.99 6.54 74%1 99.46 2.58 4.05 6.63 75% 100.80 2.62 4.10 6.72 76% 102.14 2.65 4.16 6.81 77% 103.49 2.69 4.21 6.90 78% 104.83 2.72 4.27 6.99 79% 106.181 2.76 4.32 7.08 80% 107.52 2.79 4.38 7.17 81% 108.86 2.83 4.43 7.26 82% 110.21 2.86 4.49 7.35 83% 111.55 2.90 4.54 7.44 84% 112.90 2.93 4.59 7.53 85% 114.24 2.97 4.65 7.62 86% 115.58 3.00 4.70 7.71 87% 116.93 3.04 4.76 7.80 88% 118.27 3.07 4.81 7.88 89% 119.62 3.11 4.87 7.97 90% 120.96 3.14 4.92 8.06 91% 122.30 3.18 4.98 8.15 92% 123.65 3.21 5.03 8.24 93% 124.99 3.25 5.09 8.33 94%1 126.34 3.281 5.14 8.42 95% 127.68 3.321 5.20 8.51 96% 129.02 3.35 5.25 8.60 97% 130.37 3.39 5.31 8.69 98% 131.71 3.42 5.36 8.78 99% 133.06 3.46 5.42 8.87 1000/ 134.401 3.49 5.47 8.96 A-10 �M NL N ML H H a 4 0 4 2 P 2 P a a d y 6 6 Q ~ 6 ~ o q x o q x OEM O o0 O c0 M iD o0 iD c0 M M N vt � 3 O vt �D vl vt � 3 vt vt vt vt iD �O iD iD vt 0 6 1= 6 1 t C �f1 N 01 O Ol O lD M W O N O N O O N N l0 V1 rl � C A � O A N a r a v F v F v T3 T3 LL = LL L OG L OG OC CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti ti 0 0 e d d 3 L � �f1 f` N N 00 M 00 �f1 M O �f1 lD n lD M �f1 V V1 3 L � O 00 00 M 00 01 00 n M lD N f` f lD Ol n V1 lD lD 00 �f1 n �f1 lD N C � � Z LL Z LL ti ti N O lD N O 0 N 0 o0 O iD vt ti n n O iD N vt O N N L OG L OG CL CL m in oo vi m oo m o o m r �n n ry a �n v� v m� m c T W O T W O Y O ~ Y O ~ 2 LL 2 LL ti N N ti O ti N a W M O O ry ry M a M 0 � s m s m 'z oe O O N N H N N O V1 O �f1 O O N V1 N M M M lD M c J J N N d O d 3 i �/1 V1 N 01 O a M lD N N 3 i M N CO f` O O W lD 00 n C N O N O vt n O vt O O CO � � C iD O vt vt iD iD iD o0 00 iD iD O C 7 3 7 3 C N O 3 N O Z LL Z LL N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ti O ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti O C eu -o ar p O f`p O of O vl O of O of O 1p £ O of O vl O of O of O N O of O ¢ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o = a ¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n v n v v 0 0 OEM W 0 01 V th 10 N N N M M N N _N _ O L W U m 0 QI � i JI � ona�o IoM > n mrnr�ov c �? ELu� a d a p Q d a a � J e � `°oron ro p w � o y o m W � O V) Q y m E opo s o rn n M r Ho N LL N V O V N N 0 M V O LL U 2 � N m U>Z p oU mLL. Q E Z O M O O 001 N O O � od N o o. o o o Z ou1� o d a a � o r e � `°oron ro N w � o y o m W � O V) Q y Q opo 0 Q N LL m m U m U>Z p oU mLL. Q E Z O M O O 001 N O O � od N o o. o o o Z ou1� o > w a a Q = p Q N O N L N L Z ~ U m C w O J m N�c�OO M O 0 t�O 3 F LL o F N N N N- N <") V O E O C C C O y � c o0 0� m o anm Z Opo Z Opo Z F U N N N 0 a, r E E E E K U � w d c a E E E E U_inU)io0000 F L U E CIL a c E > K o r e o r e N Z K o y o m W o Q y Q opo 0 Cl) m m H U>Z p oU mLL. Q E O M O M O O 001 N O O � Z oma o Z ou1� o o W Mo w Mo N Z o y o y o m W o Q y Q opo 0 Cl) G > p K 7 G 0 ED O N e O p O O m O N e O N N O K 0 10 O W EO�JaJ� m°o N 0 o y ouio opo z z Z N V O O M M 0 c N 0 10 O 0 10 O W EO�JaJ� m i EOC-O C�aDQO OF U>Z p oU mLL. Q E �ooaou; o p z W oma o 7 z W ou1� o U NO p1 ,..0 o O U n 10 OO w C N C w Q = Q Q N O N L N L Z ~ N N N N- N <") V O E O C C C O o0 0� m o anm Z Opo Z Opo Z F U N N N 0 a, r E E E E K p E E E E U_inU)io0000 tno 00000a e e E 100�Q� #' co 01. w Intersection Peak Hour Location: 1 st Ave at Scott Blvd , GPS Coordinates: Date: 2018-09-06 Day of week: Thursday Weather: Analyst: NB i Intersection Peak Hour 16:15-17:15 SouthBound Left Thru Right Westbound Left Thru Right Northbound Left Thru Right Eastbound Total Left Thru Right Vehicle Total 35 45 27 0 200 9 378 7 2 6 224 336 1269 Factor 0.51 0.62 0.48 0.00 0.93 0.56 0.92 0.88 0.50 0.50 0.85 0.92 0.97 pproach Factor 0.55 0.92 0.93 0.91 IC 1 N 1 st Ave @ Hickory Trail Page 1 of 3 SynchrolD: 1 Existing AverageW eekday 0 285 5 553 263 AM Peak Hour a b N 1 st Avenue a8 Year: 117121 0 a 0 38 r1 30 T Data Source: AXIOM 6 Hickory Trail 608 Hickory Trail 63 North �—± �'6 b 25 5 b N 1 st Avenue 0 254 20 320 594 274 Normalized19 Factor) (COVID- 747 0 1 385 7 355 Average Weekday a b AM Peak Hour N 1st Avenue a 11 0 a 0 51 Percent Change: 35.0% 1 41 T 8 Hickory Trail 821 Hickory Trail 85 North Based on balancing volumes 1 from the intersection of N 1 st 8 0 b 34 Avenue at Scott Blvd. 7 b N 1 st Avenue 0 343 1 27 432 802 370 Future without Project 407 776 369 Average Weekday 0 1 400 7 AM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1st Avenue a 11 Year: 2025 0 a 0 53 Growth Rate = 1.0% 42 T Years of Growth = 4 8 Hickory Trail 853 Hickory Trail 88 North Total Growth = 1.0406 1 80 b 35 7 b N 1 st Avenue 0 357 28 449 834 385 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 AM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1 st Avenue: 0 8 a 0 0 �z 0 T 23 Hickory Trail 23 Hickory Trail 0 North o 15 �&5 b 0 b N 1 st Avenue 8 0 0 15 23 8 Future with Project 407 776 369 Average Weekday 0 400 7 AM Peak Hour r1 a b N 1 st Avenue a 11 8 a 0 53 r1 42 T 31 Hickory Trail 876 Hickory Trail 88 North 1 23 0 b 35 22 b N 1 st Avenue 8 357 28 464 857 1 393 C-1 2 Access @ Scott Blvd Page 2 of 3 SynchrolD: 2 Existing 8 5 AverageW Weekday 2 0 1 AM Peak Hour 1 a b Oaknoll East a 2 Year: 8129118 605 a 603 605 l 0 T Data Source: Iowa City 1,114 Scott Blvd 1,117 Scott Blvd 1,112 North M5]06 509b 507 b Site Access 0 0 0 0 6 0 Normalized Existing (COVID- 3 8 ==5 19 Factor) 2 1 0 1 Average Weekday r1 a b AM Peak Hour Oaknoll Easta 2 605 t2 603 605 Percent Change: 0.0% r1 0 T 1,114 Scott Blvd 1,117 Scott Blvd 1,112 North 3 �' I 509 506 b 507 0 b Site Access 0 0 0 0 6 0 Future without Project 3 8 ==5 Average Weekday 2 1 0 1 AM Peak Hour 2 a b Oaknoll East a 2 Year: 2025 648 a 646 648 Growth Rate = 1.0% 0 T Years of Growth = 7 1,194 Scott Blvd 1,197 Scott Blvd 1,192 North Total Growth = 1.0721 3 546 543 b 544 0 b Site Access 0 0 0 0 6 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 AM Peak Hour 1 a b Oaknoll Easta 0 17 t2 0 3 t2 3 T 27 Scott Blvd 35 Scott Blvd 8 North o � I 10 0 b 5 10 b Site Access 17 0 5 13 35 22 Future with Project 3 8 5 Average Weekday 2 1 0 1 AM Peak Hour r1 a b Oaknoll East a 2 665 a 646 651 �z 3 T 1,221 Scott Blvd 1,232 Scott Blvd 1,200 North 3 "' I 556 543 b 549 10 b Site Access 17 0 5 13 35 1 22 C-2 3 N 1 st Ave @ Scott Blvd Page 3 of 3 SynchrolD: 3 Existing Average Weekday 1 15 5 121 110 AM Peak Hour a b N 1st Avenue a 58 Year: 8129118 603 a 243 303 r� 2 T Data Source: Iowa City 1,109 Scott Blvd 1,226 Scott Blvd 467 North 7 506 157 b 164 342 b N 1st Avenue 359 45 2 349 755 406 Normalized Existing (COVID- 11 121 110 19 Factor) 1 1 5 5 Average Weekday r2 a b AM Peak Hour N 1 st Avenue a58 603 a 243 303 Percent Change: 0.0% r1 2 T 1,109 Scott Blvd 1,226 Scott Blvd 467 North H7 �' I 506 157 b 164 342 b N 1 st Avenue 359 45 2 349 755 406 Future Project 1 129 verage Weekday � 1 5 5 A 118 AM Peak Hour a b N 1 st Avenue a 62 Year: 2025 647 a 261 325 Growth Rate = 1.0°% 2 T Years of Growth = 7 1,190 Scott Blvd 1,314 Scott Blvd 500 North Total Growth = 1.0721 8 543 168 b 175 367 b N 1 st Avenue 385 48 2 374 809 435 Total Project Trips 0 0 Average Weekday0 0 0 AM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1 st Avenue a 0 3 a 3 3 �z 0 T 8 Scott Blvd ® Scott Blvd 8 North o - I 5 5 b 5 0 b N 1st Avenue 0 0 0 0 6 0 Future with Project129 118 Average Weekday 1 5 5 5 AM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1 st Avenue a 62 650 a 264 328 �z 2 T 1,198 Scott Blvd 1,322 Scott Blvd 508 North 88 548 173 b 180 367 b N 1 st Avenue 385 48 2 374 809 1 435 C-3 1 N 1 st Ave @ Hickory Trail Page 1 of 3 SynchrolD: 1 Existing W Weekday 0 289 13 594 292 Average PM Peak Hour a b N 1 st Avenue a5 Year: 1112121 1 a 0 24 r? 19 T Data Source: AXIOM 2 Hickory Trail 639 Hickory Trail 61 North o � I 1 0 b 37 1 b N 1 st Avenue 1 287 24 309 621 312 Normalized19 Factor) (COVID- 0 37 772 6 17 380 Average Weekday a b PM Peak Hour N 1 st Avenuea 7 1 a 0 31 Percent Change: 30.0% t225 T 3 Hickory Trail 831 Hickory Trail 79 North Based on balancing volumes 0 from the intersection of N 1 st 1 0 b 48 Avenue at Scott Blvd. 1 b N 1 st Avenue 1 373 31 402 807 406 Fu Average Weekday re without Project 0 3911 18 409 804 395 PM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1 st Avenuea 7 Year: 2025 1 a 0 33 Growth Rate = 1.0% t2 26 T Years of Growth = 4 2 Hickory Trail 864 Hickory Trail 83 North Total Growth = 1.0406 0 1 0 b 50 1 b N 1 st Avenue 1 388 32 418 839 421 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 PM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1 st Avenue a 0 17 a 0 0 l 0 T 30 Hickory Trail 30 Hickory Trail 0 North 0 13 0 b 0 13 b N 1 st Avenue 17 0 0 13 30 17 Future with Project 409 804 Average W Weekday 0 3911 18 395 PM Peak Hour r2 a b N 1 st Avenue a 7 18 a 0 33 r1 26 T 32 Hickory Trail 894 Hickory Trail 83 North 0 140 b 50 14 b N 1 st Avenue 18 388 32 431 869 1 438 C-4 2 Access @ Scott Blvd Page 2 of 3 SynchrolD: 2 Existing 9 AverageW Weekday 3 0 2 4 PM Peak Hour 1 a b Oaknoll East a 2 Year: 916118 608 a 605 607 l 0 T Data Source: Iowa City 1,176 Scott Blvd 1,180 Scott Blvd 1,175 North 568kdq6b 568 b Site Access 0 0 0 0 6 0 Normalized Existing (COVID- 5 9 4 19 Factor) 3 1 0 2 Average Weekday r2 a b PM Peak Hour Oaknoll Easta 2 608 t2 605 607 Percent Change: 0.0% r1 0 T 1,176 Scott Blvd 1,180 Scott Blvd 1,175 North 2 �' I 568 566 b 568 0 b Site Access 0 0 0 0 6 0 Future without verage Weekday Project � 3 0 2 9 4 A PM Peak Hour r1 a b Oaknoll East a 2 Year: 2025 652 a 649 651 Growth Rate = 1.0% 0 T Years of Growth = 7 1,261 Scott Blvd 1,265 Scott Blvd 1,260 North Total Growth = 1.0721 2 609 607 b 609 0 b Site Access 0 0 0 0 6 0 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 PM Peak Hour 1 a b Oaknoll Easta 0 14 t2 0 6 t2 6 T 33 Scott Blvd 44 Scott Blvd 11 North 491200 19 b 5 b Site Access 14 0 5 25 44 19 Future with Project 5 9 4 Average Weekday 3 1 0 2 PM Peak Hour r2 a b Oaknoll East a 2 666 a 649 657 �z 6 T 1,294 Scott Blvd 1,309 Scott Blvd 1,271 North 2 �' I 628 607 b 614 19 b Site Access 14 0 5 25 44 1 19 C-5 3 N 1 st Ave @ Scott Blvd Page 3 of 3 SynchroID: 3 Existing Weekday 27 45 35 129 22 Average PM Peak Hour r1 a b N 1 st Avenue a 9 Year: 9/6/18 605 a 200 209 rl 0 T Data Source: Iowa City 1,171 Scott Blvd 1,269 Scott Blvd 470 North 6 566 224 b 261 336 b N 1st Avenue 378 7 2 381 768 387 Normalized19 Factor) (COVID- 107 27 45 35 129 22 Average Weekday a b PM Peak Hour N 1st Avenue a 9 605 a 200 209 Percent Change: 0.0% 0 T 1,171 Scott Blvd 1,269 Scott Blvd 470 North H6 566224 b 261 336 b N 1 st Avenue 378 7 2 381 768 387 Future Project verage Weekday � 29 48 139 38 Ae24 PM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1st Avenue a 10 Year: 2025 648 a 214 224 Growth Rate = 1.0% 0 T Years of Growth = 7 1,254 Scott Blvd 1,360 Scott Blvd 504 North Total Growth = 1.0721 6 606 240 b 280 360 b N 1 st Avenue 405 8 2 408 823 415 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 PM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1st Avenuea 0 6 a 6 6 �z 0 T 11 Scott Blvd 11 Scott Blvd 11 North o - I 5 5 b 5 0 b N 1 st Avenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 Future with Project 115 139 Average Weekday 29 48 38 24 PM Peak Hour 1 a b N 1st Avenue a 10 654 a 220 230 �z 0 T 1,265 Scott Blvd 1,371 Scott Blvd 515 North 611k265 b 285 60 b N 1st Avenue 405 8 2 408 823 1 415 C-6 Existing Conditions AM.syn 1: N 1 st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 999 1012 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 7 41 0 7 0 343 27 7 385 0 Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 7 41 0 7 0 343 27 7 385 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 5.51 None 6.11 - None - None Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 - None Storage Length 4.009 - 2.209 - - 2.209 - - 223 - 568 - 246 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 1081 - 0 538 - 0 - 562 0 - Grade, % 0 - 573 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - - Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 1 0 9 54 0 9 0 451 36 9 507 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 999 1012 507 999 994 469 507 0 0 487 0 0 Stage 1 525 525 - 469 469 - - - - - - - Stage 2 474 487 - 530 525 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 223 240 568 223 246 596 1063 - 1081 - Stage 1 538 531 - 577 562 - - - - - Stage 2 573 552 - 534 531 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 218 237 568 217 243 596 1063 - 1081 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 218 237 - 217 243 - - - - - Stage 1 538 525 - 577 562 - - - Stage 2 564 552 - 519 525 - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.8 25.4 0 0.1 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1063 - 473 239 1081 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.022 0.264 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 12.8 25.4 8.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - B D A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 1 0 - - GTC (MJP) Existing Conditions AM Page 1 D-1 Existing Conditions AM.syn 2: Site Access/Oaknoll East & Scott Blvd Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Major1 Major2 Minor1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 506 0 Future Vol, veh/h 3 506 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 0 None Storage Length 0 2 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 569 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 Minor2 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 603 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 603 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - None - 5.52 None 6.12 - None Critical Hdwy Stg 2 0 - - - 0 - 6.12 0 - Follow-up Hdwy 0 - 2.218 - 0 - 3.518 0 3.318 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 678 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 Minor2 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) Conflicting Flow All 680 0 0 569 0 0 1255 1255 569 1254 1254 679 Stage 1 - - - - - - 575 575 - 679 679 - Stage 2 - - - - 680 680 - 575 575 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 912 - 1003 - 148 172 522 149 172 452 Stage 1 - - - - 503 503 - 441 451 - Stage 2 - - - - 441 451 - 503 503 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 912 - 1003 - 147 171 522 148 171 452 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 147 171 - 148 171 - Stage 1 - - 500 500 - 439 451 Stage 2 - - 439 451 - 500 500 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 0 18.6 HCM LOS A C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 912 - 1003 - 268 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - - 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 9 0 - 0 - 18.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - 0 GTC (MJP) Existing Conditions AM Page 2 D-2 Existing Conditions PM.syn 1: N 1 st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 884 897 413 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 25 0 7 1 373 31 17 376 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 25 0 7 1 373 31 17 376 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 - None - 4.009 None 2.209 - None Storage Length 267 280 - 268 - 630 - - Stage 1 - 573 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - - - 0 - - 0 573 Grade, % - 0 - Platoon blocked, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 27 0 8 1 410 34 19 413 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 884 897 413 881 880 427 413 0 0 444 0 0 Stage 1 451 451 - 429 429 - - - - - - - Stage 2 433 446 - 452 451 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 267 280 641 268 287 630 1151 - 1121 - Stage 1 590 573 - 606 586 - - - - - Stage 2 603 576 - 589 573 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 259 274 641 263 280 630 1151 - 1121 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 259 274 - 263 280 - - - - - Stage 1 589 560 - 605 585 - - - Stage 2 595 575 - 575 560 - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.6 18.5 0 0.4 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1151 - 641 301 1121 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.002 0.117 0.017 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 10.6 18.5 8.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A B C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0.4 0.1 - - GTC (MJP) Existing Conditions PM Page 1 D-3 Existing Conditions PM.syn 2: Site Access/Oaknoll East & Scott Blvd Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Major1 Major2 Minor1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 566 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 566 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 0 None Storage Length 0 3 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 615 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 Minor2 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 605 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 605 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - None - 5.52 None 6.12 - None Critical Hdwy Stg 2 0 - - - 0 - 6.12 0 - Follow-up Hdwy 0 - 2.218 - 0 - 3.518 0 3.318 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 658 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 Minor2 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) Conflicting Flow All 660 0 0 615 0 0 1280 1279 615 1278 1278 659 Stage 1 - - - - - - 619 619 - 659 659 - Stage 2 - - - - 661 660 - 619 619 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 928 - 965 - 143 166 491 143 166 464 Stage 1 - - - - 476 480 - 453 461 - Stage 2 - - - - 452 460 - 476 480 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 928 - 965 - 142 166 491 143 166 464 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 142 166 - 143 166 - Stage 1 - - 475 479 - 452 461 Stage 2 - - 449 460 - 475 479 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 20.1 HCM LOS A C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 928 - 965 - 244 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.022 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 8.9 0 - 0 - 20.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - 0.1 GTC (MJP) Existing Conditions PM Page 2 D-4 Baseline Conditions AM.syn 1: N 1 st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1040 1051 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 7 42 0 11 0 357 28 7 400 0 Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 7 42 0 11 0 357 28 7 400 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 5.51 None 6.11 - None - None Follow-up Hdwy - None Storage Length 3.509 - 3.309 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 228 - 210 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 Stage 1 - 0 - 562 0 - Grade, % 0 - Stage 2 0 541 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 1 0 9 55 0 14 0 470 37 9 526 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1040 1051 526 1038 1033 489 526 0 0 507 0 0 Stage 1 544 544 - 489 489 - - - - - - - Stage 2 496 507 - 549 544 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 209 228 554 210 233 581 1046 - 1063 - Stage 1 525 521 - 562 551 - - - - - Stage 2 558 541 - 522 521 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 202 225 554 205 230 581 1046 - 1063 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 202 225 - 205 230 - - - - - Stage 1 525 515 - 562 551 - - - Stage 2 544 541 - 507 515 - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.1 26.4 0 0.1 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1046 - 455 237 1063 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.023 0.294 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - 13.1 26.4 8.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - B D A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 1.2 0 - - GTC (MJP) Baseline 2025 Conditions AM Page 1 D-5 Baseline Conditions AM.syn 2: Site Access/Oaknoll East & Scott Blvd Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Major1 Major2 Minor1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 543 0 Future Vol, veh/h 3 543 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 0 None Storage Length 0 2 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 610 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 Minor2 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 646 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 646 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - None - 5.52 None 6.12 - None Critical Hdwy Stg 2 0 - - - 0 - 6.12 0 - Follow-up Hdwy 0 - 2.218 - 0 - 3.518 0 3.318 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 726 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 Minor2 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) Conflicting Flow All 728 0 0 610 0 0 1344 1344 610 1343 1343 727 Stage 1 - - - - - - 616 616 - 727 727 - Stage 2 - - - - 728 728 - 616 616 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 876 - 969 - 129 152 494 129 152 424 Stage 1 - - - - 478 482 - 415 429 - Stage 2 - - - - 415 429 - 478 482 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 876 - 969 - 128 151 494 128 151 424 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 128 151 - 128 151 - Stage 1 - - 476 480 - 413 429 Stage 2 - - 413 429 - 476 480 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0 0 20.3 HCM LOS A C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 876 - 969 - 239 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - - 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 9.1 0 - 0 - 20.3 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - 0 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2025 Conditions AM Page 2 D-6 Baseline Conditions PM.syn 1: N 1 st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 920 933 430 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 26 0 7 1 388 32 18 391 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 26 0 7 1 388 32 18 391 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 - None - 4.009 None 2.209 - None Storage Length 253 267 - 254 - 616 - - Stage 1 - 562 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - - - 0 - - 0 562 Grade, % - 0 - Platoon blocked, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 29 0 8 1 426 35 20 430 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 920 933 430 917 916 444 430 0 0 461 0 0 Stage 1 470 470 - 446 446 - - - - - - - Stage 2 450 463 - 471 470 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 253 267 627 254 273 616 1135 - 1105 - Stage 1 576 562 - 593 576 - - - - - Stage 2 590 566 - 575 562 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 245 260 627 249 266 616 1135 - 1105 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 245 260 - 249 266 - - - - - Stage 1 575 549 - 592 575 - - - Stage 2 582 565 - 560 549 - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.8 19.5 0 0.4 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1135 - 627 285 1105 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - 0.002 0.127 0.018 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 10.8 19.5 8.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A B C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 0.4 0.1 - - GTC (MJP) Baseline 2025 Conditions PM Page 1 D-7 Baseline Conditions PM.syn 2: Site Access/Oaknoll East & Scott Blvd Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Major1 Major2 Minor1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 607 0 Future Vol, veh/h 2 607 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized 0 0 None Storage Length 0 3 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 660 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 Minor2 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 649 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 649 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - None - 5.52 None 6.12 - None Critical Hdwy Stg 2 0 - - - 0 - 6.12 0 - Follow-up Hdwy 0 - 2.218 - 0 - 3.518 0 3.318 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 705 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 Minor2 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) Conflicting Flow All 707 0 0 660 0 0 1372 1371 660 1370 1370 706 Stage 1 - - - - - - 664 664 - 706 706 - Stage 2 - - - - 708 707 - 664 664 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 891 - 928 - 123 146 463 124 146 436 Stage 1 - - - - 450 458 - 427 439 - Stage 2 - - - - 426 438 - 450 458 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 891 - 928 - 122 145 463 124 145 436 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 122 145 - 124 145 - Stage 1 - - 448 456 - 425 439 Stage 2 - - 423 438 - 448 456 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 22 HCM LOS A C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 891 - 928 - 217 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - - 0.025 HCM Control Delay (s) 0 9.1 0 - 0 - 22 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0 - - 0 - 0.1 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2025 Conditions PM Page 2 Future With Conditions AM.syn 1: N 1 st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1062 1073 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 0 22 42 0 11 8 357 28 7 400 0 Future Vol, veh/h 1 0 22 42 0 11 8 357 28 7 400 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized 5.51 None 6.11 - None - None Follow-up Hdwy - None Storage Length 3.509 - 3.309 - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - 221 - 200 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 Stage 1 - 0 - 547 0 - Grade, % 0 - Stage 2 0 529 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 1 0 29 55 0 14 11 470 37 9 526 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1062 1073 526 1070 1055 489 526 0 0 507 0 0 Stage 1 544 544 - 511 511 - - - - - - - Stage 2 518 529 - 559 544 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 202 221 554 200 227 581 1046 - 1063 - Stage 1 525 521 - 547 539 - - - - - Stage 2 542 529 - 515 521 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 193 215 554 186 221 581 1046 - 1063 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 193 215 - 186 221 - - - - - Stage 1 517 515 - 539 531 - - - Stage 2 521 521 - 482 515 - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 12.5 29.3 0.2 0.1 HCM LOS B D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1046 - 512 217 1063 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.01 - 0.059 0.321 0.009 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 0 12.5 29.3 8.4 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A B D A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 1.3 0 - - GTC (MJP) Future 2025 With Conditions AM Page 1 Future With Conditions AM.syn 2: Site Access/Oaknoll East & Scott Blvd Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Major1 Major2 Minor1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 543 10 Future Vol, veh/h 3 543 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized 17 0 None Storage Length 0 2 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 610 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 235 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Minor2 0.004 - 0.004 - 3 646 2 17 0 5 1 0 2 3 646 2 17 0 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - None - 5.52 None 6.12 - None Critical Hdwy Stg 2 0 - - - 0 - 6.12 0 - Follow-up Hdwy 0 - 2.218 - 0 - 3.518 0 3.318 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 726 2 19 0 6 1 0 2 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 235 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Minor2 0.004 - 0.004 - Conflicting Flow All 728 0 0 621 0 0 1356 1356 616 1358 1360 727 Stage 1 - - - - - - 622 622 - 733 733 - Stage 2 - - - - 734 734 - 625 627 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 876 - 960 - 126 149 491 126 148 424 Stage 1 - - - - 474 479 - 412 426 - Stage 2 - - - - 412 426 - 473 476 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 876 - 960 - 124 148 491 124 147 424 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 124 148 - 124 147 - Stage 1 - - 472 477 - 410 424 Stage 2 - - 408 424 - 465 474 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 33.9 20.5 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 149 876 - 960 - 235 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.166 0.004 - 0.004 - 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 33.9 9.1 0 - 8.8 0 20.5 HCM Lane LOS D A A - A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0 - 0 GTC (MJP) Future 2025 With Conditions AM Page 2 D-10 Future With Conditions PM.syn 1: N 1 st Ave & Hickory Trail Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 958 971 430 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 14 26 0 7 18 388 32 18 391 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 14 26 0 7 18 388 32 18 391 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 - None - 4.009 None 2.209 - None Storage Length 238 254 - 236 - 616 - - Stage 1 - 562 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - - - - 0 - - 0 562 Grade, % - 0 - Platoon blocked, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 0 0 15 29 0 8 20 426 35 20 430 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 958 971 430 962 954 444 430 0 0 461 0 0 Stage 1 470 470 - 484 484 - - - - - - - Stage 2 488 501 - 478 470 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.11 6.51 6.21 7.11 6.51 6.21 4.11 - 4.11 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.11 5.51 - 6.11 5.51 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 4.009 3.309 3.509 4.009 3.309 2.209 - 2.209 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 238 254 627 236 260 616 1135 - 1105 - Stage 1 576 562 - 566 554 - - - - - Stage 2 563 544 - 570 562 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 227 242 627 222 248 616 1135 - 1105 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 227 242 - 222 248 - - - - - Stage 1 562 549 - 552 541 - - - Stage 2 543 531 - 543 549 - - - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 10.9 21.3 0.3 0.4 HCM LOS B C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1135 - 627 257 1105 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.025 0.141 0.018 - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 10.9 21.3 8.3 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A B C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 0.5 0.1 - - GTC (MJP) Future 2025 With Conditions PM Page 1 D-11 Future With Conditions PM.syn 2: Site Access/Oaknoll East & Scott Blvd Hickory Trail Estates (GTC 21-005) Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Major1 Major2 Minor1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 607 19 Future Vol, veh/h 2 607 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free RT Channelized 14 0 None Storage Length 0 3 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - Grade, % 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 660 21 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Minor2 0.002 - 0.007 - 6 649 2 14 0 5 2 0 3 6 649 2 14 0 5 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - None - 5.52 None 6.12 - None Critical Hdwy Stg 2 0 - - - 0 - 6.12 0 - Follow-up Hdwy 0 - 2.218 - 0 - 3.518 0 3.318 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 705 2 15 0 5 2 0 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Minor2 0.002 - 0.007 - Conflicting Flow All 707 0 0 681 0 0 1397 1396 671 1397 1405 706 Stage 1 - - - - - - 675 675 - 720 720 - Stage 2 - - - - 722 721 - 677 685 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.12 - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.218 - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 891 - 912 - 118 141 456 118 139 436 Stage 1 - - - - 444 453 - 419 432 - Stage 2 - - - - 418 432 - 443 448 - Platoon blocked, % - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 891 - 912 - 116 139 456 115 137 436 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 116 139 - 115 137 - Stage 1 - - 442 451 - 417 426 Stage 2 - - 409 426 - 436 446 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 34.1 22.9 HCM LOS D C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 144 891 - 912 - 206 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.143 0.002 - 0.007 - 0.026 HCM Control Delay (s) 34.1 9.1 0 - 9 0 22.9 HCM Lane LOS D A A - A A C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0 - 0.1 GTC (MJP) Future 2025 With Conditions PM Page 2 D-12 jDOT Crash Detail Report 20181073217 10/16/2018 15:24 1 HICKORY TRL AND N 1ST AVE County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Followed too close Roadway Type: Intersection: T -intersection Severity:: Possible/Unknown Injury Fatalities: 0 Major Injuries: 0 Minor Injuries: 0 Possible Injuries: 2 Severity:: Possible/Unknown Injury Unit 1 Manner of Crash: Rear -end (front to rear) Surface Conditions: Dry Light Conditions: Daylight Weather Conditions: Clear Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Property Damage: $3,000 Unit 2 Init Trav Dir: South Veh Action: Movement essentially straight Configuration: Sport utility vehicle Driver Age: 33 Driver Gender: F Driver Cond: Emotional (e.g., depressed, angry) Driver Contr 1: Followed too close Driver Contr 2: Not reported Fixed Object: None (no fixed object struck) 20201157310 01/15/2020 04:30 County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Other Roadway Type: Feature: Non-junction/no special feature Slowing/stopping (deceleration) Sport utility vehicle 71 F Apparently normal No improper action Not reported None (no fixed object struck) HICKORY TRL AND N 1 STAVE Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit Severity:: Property Damage Only Manner of Crash: Sideswipe, opposite direction Fatalities: 0 Surface Conditions: Ice/frost Major Injuries: 0 Minor Injuries: 0 Possible Injuries: 0 Severity:: Property Damage Only Unit 1 Light Conditions: Dark - unknown roadway lighting Weather Conditions: Cloudy Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Property Damage: $5,000 Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit 2 JUnit Init Trav Dir: South North Veh Action: Movement essentially straight Configuration: Four -tire light truck (pick-up) Driver Age: 47 Driver Gender: F Driver Cond: Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: Other Driver Contr 2: Not reported Fixed Object: None (no fixed object struck) January 21, 2021 Movement essentially straight Passengercar F Apparently normal No improper action Not reported None (no fixed object struck) Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Page 1 E-1 jDOT Crash Detail Report 20181070658 10/02/2018 16:39 N SCOTT BLVD County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Followed too close Roadway Type: Feature: Non-junction/no special feature Severity:: Suspected Minor Injury Manner of Crash: Rear -end (front to rear) Fatalities: 0 Surface Conditions: Dry Major Injuries: 0 Light Conditions: Daylight Minor Injuries: 1 Weather Conditions: Cloudy Possible Injuries: 0 Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Severity:: Suspected Minor Injury Property Damage: $8,000 Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit Init Trav Dir: East East Veh Action: Movement essentially straight Stopped in traffic Configuration: Sport utility vehicle Four -tire light truck (pick-up) Driver Age: 25 52 Driver Gender: F M Driver Cond: Emotional (e.g., depressed, angry) Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: Followed too close No improper action Driver Contr 2: Not reported Not reported Fixed Object: None (no fixed object struck) None (no fixed object struck) January 21, 2021 Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Page 1 E-2 Hickory Trail Estates GTC #21-005 Scott Boulevard at Site Access (PM Peak -hour) Left -Turn Storage Guidelines 1300 , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Below eurve, storage not needed -for rapacity- - - Above curve, further analysis recommended. ' *DHV is total volume from both directions **Speeds are posted speeds 1200 1100 1000 900 ' > ' 2 � 800 ' O H i 700 i i i 600 i i , ' 4 500 ' SOmah* 400 60 mph** 300 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% % Total DHV Turning Left (single turning movement) Total DHV: 1,285 Posted Speed: 35 mph Left Turns: 6 % Left: 0.5% Based on WSDOT September 2019 Design Manual: Exhibit 1310-7a, Page 1310-14. F - l il THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA 17 December 2020 Mike Welch Professional Engineer Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, IA 52240 mwelch@axiom-con.com OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHAEOLOGIST 700 Clinton Street Building Iowa City, Iowa 52242 319-384-0732 osa@uiowa.edu archaeology.uiowa.edu RE: Phase I Archaeological Survey, Scott Boulvard Subdivision Project, Iowa City, Johnson County, OSA Technical Report 1622 Dear Mike: Attached please find the OSA report Phase IIntensive Archaeological Investigation of the Proposed Scott Boulevard Subdivision Project, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, by Warren Davis (TR 1622). As a result of the study no previously recorded archaeological sites were located within the project area and no newly recorded sites were identified. No further archaeological work is recommended in the surveyed areas. The details of our findings are provided in the attached report. As you know, to complete your archaeological compliance obligations, copies of the enclosed report must also be provided to the appropriate state or federal agencies involved with the project and comment solicited; we assume you will handle this distribution. Keep in mind that agency comments must be received prior to ground -disturbing activities being undertaken within the project area. The University of Iowa Accounts Payable department will invoice you for this project in about 30 days. If you have any questions, please contact me at 319-384-0937 or via e-mail at william-whittaker@uiowa.edu. Thank you for selecting the OSA for your archaeological service needs and good luck with your project. Sincerely, William E. Whittaker, Ph.D., Research Director Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigation of the Proposed Scott Boulevard Subdivision Project, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa by Warren Davis Office of the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa 700 Clinton Street Building Iowa City, IA 52242 Technical Report 1622 2020 cHp,Edi0C,1,,r Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigation of the Proposed Scott Boulevard Subdivision Project, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa by Warren Davis William E. Whittaker Principal Investigator Prepared for Axiom Consultants 60 East Court Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Prepared by Office of the State Archaeologist The University of Iowa 700 Clinton Street Building Iowa City, IA 52242 Technical Report 1622 December 16, 2020 Information contained in this report relating to the nature and location of archaeological sites is considered private and confidential and not for public disclosure in accordance with Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 307103); 36 CFR Part 800.6 (a)(S) of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's rules implementing Sections 106 and 110 of the Act; and Chapter 22.7 § 20 of the Iowa Code Abstract A Phase I intensive archaeological survey was conducted by the University of Iowa Office of the State Archaeologist at the location of the proposed Scott Boulevard Subdivision, Johnson County, Iowa. The field investigation was conducted on December 3-4, 2020. No artifacts or archaeological features were identified in the survey of the 59.9 ac parcel. No further archaeological investigation of the area surveyed prior to the proposed project activities is recommended. Introduction The Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) of the University of Iowa has prepared this report under the terms of a cultural resource survey agreement between OSA and Axiom Consultants of Iowa City, Iowa. This report records the results of a Phase I archaeological investigation of the proposed Scott Boulevard Subdivision. This project area is situated in Sections 1 and 2, T79N-R6W, Johnson County, Iowa (Figures 1-5). The proposed project involves development of the area into a subdivision. The area surveyed 59.9 ac (19.2 ha). This project was undertaken for compliance with the Iowa City Zoning Code: Sensitive Lands and Features, Archaeological sites, Archaeological Study (Article 1:14-51-12-E). The Phase I investigation was conducted on December 3-4 by Warren Davis and Stephen Valdez and took 28 person hours in the field. Warren Davis served as report author and William Whittaker served as project director. The OSA is solely responsible for the interpretations and recommendations contained in this report. All records including maps and figures are curated in the OSA Archives. The National Archeological Data Base Form is included as Appendix 1. Information contained in this report relating to the nature and location of archaeological sites is considered private and confidential and not for public disclosure in accordance with Section 304 of the National Historic Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. § 307103); 36 CFR Part 800.6 (a)(5) of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's rules implementing Sections 106 and 110 of the Act; and Chapter 22.7 § 20 of the Iowa Code. Geomorphological Context The proposed project area is located within Iowa's largest landform region, known as the Southern Iowa Drift Plain. The topography of this area is one of steeply rolling hills, level upland divides, stepped erosion surfaces, and dendritic drainage networks. Uplands are mantled by a moderate to thick cover of Wisconsinan-age loess. Pre-Illinoian glacial drift and underlying sedimentary bedrock are exposed within the deeper stream valleys. Southeast Iowa is dominated by broad, level upland divides that represent undissected remnants of surfaces developed during the Yarmouth and Sangamon stages on a Pre-Illinoian drift plain. The areal extent of undissected uplands decreases with distance westward, and stepped hillslopes and deep valleys dominate the south-central part of the state. In southwest Iowa, flat upland divides are nearly absent (Prior 1991:61-64). Holocene alluvial valley fills in Iowa are subdivided on the basis of lithology and stratigraphic relationships into the Gunder, Corrington, Roberts Creek, and Camp Creek members of the DeForest formation (Bettis and Littke 1987). Gunder member alluvium and Corrington member alluvial fans may contain Paleoindian through Woodland components; Roberts Creek member deposits may contain Late OSA Technical Report 1622 Archaic through early historic components; and Camp Creek member alluvium may contain buried and unburied historic archaeological components, and may bury older surfaces. Environmental Context The proposed project area is situated in a deeply-ravined grassy and lightly wooded area on the northern extents of Iowa City. The area is in the E'/2, SE'/4 of Section 2, and the SW'/4, SW'/4, SW'/4, T79N-R6W, Johnson County, Iowa, 0.1 km east of the intersection of First Avenue and Scott Boulevard, at an elevation of 780 ft above mean sea level (Figures 1-5). At the time of survey, the proposed project area was in mowed grass and light timber cover. The parcel consisted of an irregular area measuring 750 x 400 m in maximum extent. Project area entrances, staging areas, and material storage areas will be within surveyed areas or on nearby paved areas. Soils of the project area are mapped as Fayette silt loam at 5-40% slope, Lindley loam at 18-25% slope, and a complex of Nodaway and Arenzville silt loam at 1-4% slope (Figure 2; Table 1; Artz 2005; Schemerhorn 1983; USDA 2020). Soils in upland settings, such as Fayette and Lindley, have relatively shallow archaeological potential when the parent material predates the earliest human occupation of Iowa and Holocene -aged surface deposition is slow or absent. Movement of artifacts within the soil column is restricted to biologically active horizons. If there is adequate ground surface visibility, larger archaeological sites in plowed upland soils will generally display surface artifacts. Shallow subsurface deposits may exist in unplowed upland areas, and the bottoms of deep human -dug features may be preserved even in plowed areas. Subsurface archaeological testing within these upland settings is usually terminated below the biologically active zone as indicated by the presence of a pedologically formed subsoil (B horizon), relatively unaltered parent material (C horizon), or bedrock (R horizon). The Landscape Model for Archaeological Site Suitability (LANDMASS) is a useful tool for predicting the suitability of a particular upland landform position for prehistoric habitation (Artz et al. 2006; Riley et al. 2011). The ranking is divided into three suitability rankings: low, moderate, and high, based on logistic regression statistical analysis of how often sites have been found in areas with topographically similar terrain. Based upon the model, the project area is located on a landform with a high prehistoric suitability ranking. It is important to note that this predictive model is limited to upland landforms and does not include alluvial settings, such as river valleys and drainages. Historical and Cultural Context The Iowa Site Record at OSA, records of previous archaeological surveys nearby (OSA 2020), the National Register Information System web site (National Park Service 2020), the Andreas atlas of Iowa (Andreas 1875), and Johnson County plat books (Anonymous 1905; Economy Advertising 1917; Hixson 1930; Huebinger 1900; Koser Bros. 1934; Novak 1889; Thompson and Everts 1870) were reviewed for this survey. Other consulted resources included the 1839 General Land Office survey map (ISUGISRF 2020; U.S. Department of the Interior 2020), older U.S. Geological Survey maps (USGS 2020), the Historic Indian Location Database (HILD), and the OSA Notable Locations database of cemeteries and poorly located historic or archaeological locations (Whittaker 2016, 2020). Historic documentation revealed no buildings or other improvements within the proposed project area, and there are no standing buildings or structures located within the proposed project area (Figures 2-3). Historic aerial photography indicates that the area has been largely under agriculture for most of the twentieth century, though the areas currently under grass may have been graded or contoured in the 1990s. Areas currently under timber were largely absent throughmost of the twentieth century, with most present timber postdating the 1980s. A series of trails ran through the project area, largely along what is now the 2 OSA Technical Report 1622 timber line on the west -central portion of the project area. In addition, the trees along the drainage in the southern portion of the proposed project area were removed in the 1980s to allow for more agricultural land. The drainage may have also been straightened or otherwise modified at this time. A farmstead is present on the 1870 Thompson and Everetts map just north of the proposed project area, north of what is now Scott Boulevard. That farmstead is likely under or been impacted by modern development. There are 17 archaeological sites recorded within 1.6 km (1 mi) of the project area. The closest site is 13JH1100, a prehistoric isolated find consisting of a single piece of Late Woodland pottery, located immediately to the east of the project area. Site 13JH1100 was determined to be not eligible for listing in the NRHP by SHPO on Nov. 13, 2001 SHPO NADB files). The southern portion of the project area overlaps with a small portion of a cultural resources survey by Lensink (1978) of proposed Ralston Creek storm water detention units. The next nearest survey was a Phase I survey by Weitzel (2001) for proposed First Avenue expansion just east of the project area. Site 13JH1100 was found near the project area in the 2001 survey. The HILD reveals no documented historic Native American use of the project area or nearby areas. The Notable Locations database shows the locations of St. Joseph's Cemetery 0.7 km to the east, and Oakland Cemetery, 0.7 km to the southeast. Archaeological Assessment METHODS Ground surface visibility was inadequate for pedestrian survey, at less than 25%. The proposed project area was investigated through 5 m interval pedestrian survey and the hand excavation of 67 20 cm diameter auger tests, in linear transects at 15 m intervals (Figure 3). Auger test soils were removed in arbitrary 10 cm levels to examine soil stratigraphy and were screened with quarter -inch hardware cloth. Soils were described using the conventions of Schoenberger et al. (2012). Maximum test depth was 100 cm. RESULTS No artifacts were observed on the surface. No artifacts were recovered in auger tests. Subsurface tests indicated that the proposed project area showed evidence of heavy disturbance, with topsoil (A or Ap) horizons either truncated or missing from auger test profiles. This missing topsoil supports disturbances seen in late twentieth century aerial photography. Typical profiles for auger tests in uplands revealed soils comparable to eroded Fayette soil, with a very thin brown Ap horizon over a dark yellowish Btl and yellowish brown Bt2 horizon (Table 2). Auger tests along the drainage in the south of the project area revealed a brown Ap horizon over a brown and yellowish brown mixed C horizon, likely indicating past disturbance. None of the auger tests or cores encountered buried A horizons or other buried surfaces suitable for habitation. Management Recommendations The Phase I archaeological survey by the OSA of a proposed Scott Boulevard Subdivision revealed no archaeological material or other cultural deposits. The proposed project area was surveyed through pedestrian survey and excavation of 67 auger tests. Because of this absence of cultural resources and the lack of potential for intact deposits, no further archaeological work for this project is recommended. No technique is completely adequate to locate all archaeological materials, especially deeply buried ones. Therefore, should any cultural, historical, or paleontological resources be exposed as part of proposed project activities, the responsible agency must be notified immediately in accordance with the Protection of Historic Properties regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation [36 CFR Part 3 OSA Technical Report 1622 800.13(b)]. If human remains are accidentally discovered, Iowa burial law [Code of Iowa, Sections 263B, 523I.316(6), and 716.5; IAC 685, Ch. 11.1] requires that all work in the vicinity of the finding be halted, the remains protected, local law enforcement officials notified, and the Bioarchaeology director at the OSA contacted immediately (319-384-0740). Archaeologists with the OSA (319-384-0937) and the State Historical Society of Iowa (515-281-8744) are also available to consult on issues of accidental discovery. References Cited Andreas, Alfred T. 1875 Illustrated Historical Atlas of the State of Iowa. State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City. Anonymous 1905 [Johnson County, Iowa] No publisher listed. University of Iowa Libraries digital map collection, digital.lib.uiowa.edu/islandora/object/ui:atlases, accessed December 16, 2020. Artz, Joe A. 2005 Ackmore to Zwingle: Soil Series of Iowa. Iowa I -Sites, Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa, Iowa City. Electronic document, www.iowaisites.com/soil-series, accessed December 16, 2020. Artz, Joe A., Chad Goings, and Melanie A. Riley 2006 LANDMASS: A GIS Model for Prehistoric Archaeological Site Suitability in Iowa. Paper presented at the 64th Plains Anthropological Conference, Topeka, Kansas. Bettis, E. Arthur III, and John P. Littke 1987 Holocene Alluvial Stratigraphy and Landscape Development in Soap Creek Watershed, Appanoose, Davis, Monroe, and Wapello Counties, Iowa. Open File Report 87-2. Iowa Geological Survey Bureau, Iowa City. Economy Advertising 1917 Atlas of Johnson County, Iowa. Economy Advertising Company, Iowa City, Iowa. University of Iowa Libraries digital map collection, digital.lib.uiowa.edu/islandora/object/ui:atlases, accessed December 16, 2020. Hixson, W. W. 1930 Plat Book of Johnson County, Iowa. W.W. Hixson, Rockford, Illinois. University of Iowa Libraries digital map collection, digital.lib.uiowa.edu/islandora/object/ui:atlases, accessed December 16, 2020. Huebinger 1900 Atlas of Johnson County, Iowa. Huebinger Survey and Map, Davenport, Iowa. University of Iowa Libraries digital map collection, digital.lib.uiowa.edu/islandora/object/ui:atlases, accessed December 16, 2020. Iowa State University Geographic Information Systems Support and Research Facility (ISUGISSRF) 2020 Iowa Geographic Map Server. Iowa State University Geographic Information Systems Support and Research Facility, Ames, Iowa. Electronic document, ortho.gis.iastate.edu, accessed December 16, 2020. Koser Bros. 1934 Atlas of Johnson County, Iowa. Koser Brothers, unknown location. University of Iowa Libraries digital map collection, digital.lib.uiowa.edu/islandora/object/ui:atlases, accessed December 16, 2020. Lensink, Stephen C. 1978 A Cultural Resource Survey of the Proposed Ralston Creek Storm Water Detention Units, Iowa City, Iowa. Contract Completion Report 143. Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa, Iowa City. National Park Service 2020 National Register Information System, National Register of Historic Places. National Park Service, Washington, DC. Electronic document, www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/database-research.htm, accessed December 16, 2020. Novak, J. J. 1889 Novak's New Map of Johnson County. J. J. Novak, Iowa City, Iowa. University of Iowa Libraries digital map collection, digital.lib.uiowa.edu/islandora/object/ui:atlases, accessed December 16, 2020. OSA Technical Report 1622 Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) 2020 I -Sites: An Online GIS and Database for Iowa Archaeology. Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa. Electronic document, www.iowaisites.com, accessed December 16, 2020. Prior, Jean C. 1991 Landforms of Iowa. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City. Riley, Melanie A., Chad A. Goings, and Joe Alan Artz 2011 The Landscape Model for Archaeological Site Suitability (LANDMASS). In Archaeological Modeling for the Iowa Portion of the Proposed Rock Island Clean Line Transmission System, by Melanie A. Riley, Chad A. Goings, and Joe Alan Artz, pp. 5-14. Contract Completion Report 1869. Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa, Iowa City. Schermerhorn, Edward J. 1983 Soil Survey of Johnson County, Iowa. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Schoeneberger, P. J., D. A. Wysocki, and E. C. Benham 2012 Field book for Describing and Sampling Soils. Version 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska. Electronic document, www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_052523.pdf, accessed December 16, 2020. Thompson and Everts 1870 Combination Atlas Map of Johnson County, Iowa. Thompson and Everts, Geneva, Illinois. University of Iowa Libraries digital map collection, digital.lib.uiowa.edu/islandora/object/ui:atlases, accessed December 16, 2020. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2020 Official Soil Series Descriptions. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Electronic document, www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/main/soils/survey, accessed December 16, 2020. U.S. Department of the Interior 2020 The Official Federal Land Records Site. Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of the Interior. Electronic document, livingatlas.arcgis.com/topoexplorer, accessed December 16, 2020. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2018 US Topo: Maps for America. National Geospatial Program. Electronic document, www.usgs.gov/core- science-systems/national-geospatial-program/us-topo-maps-america. 2020 USGS Historical Topographic Map Explorer. Electronic document, ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/, accessed December 16, 2020. Whittaker, William E. 2016 An Analysis of Historic -Era Indian Locations in Iowa. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 41:159- 185. 2020 Historic Indian Location Database. Electronic document on file, Office of the State Archaeologist, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, accessed December 16, 2020. 5 OSA Technical Report 1622 Table 1. Project Area Mapped Soils. Soil Name ID Description I -Sites LSA' Landform Native Pedon Vegetation Arenzville- 729B 1-4% slopes Camp Creek Drainageways Tall grass prairie Ap-C1-C2- Nodaway C3 Complex Lindley 65F2 18-25% slopes; moderately eroded Fayette M163 5-40% slopes Shallow to pre- Hillslopes Wisconsin till Loess mantled Hillslopes terrace, thick loess 'Landform/Sediment Assemblage (Artz 2005). 2 Tall grass prairie A-E-Btl- Bt2-Bt3- Bt4-C Tall grass prairie Ap-BE-Btt- Bt2-BC-C OSA Technical Report 1622 Table 2. Representative Soil Profiles. Location Dem) epth Description Auger Test 4 0-5 Ap horizon of brown (I OYR 4/3) silt loam; fine subangular blocky structure; friable; clear smooth boundary. 5-30 Bt horizon of dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/4) silty clay loam; fine to moderate subangular blocky structure; friable; gradual smooth boundary. 30-50 Bt2 horizon of yellowish brown (I OYR 5/4) silty clay loam; moderate subangular blocky structure; friable to firm. Auger Test 0-20 AC horizon of brown (I OYR 4/3) silt loam; fine subangular blocky structure; 13 friable; clear smooth boundary. 20-100 C horizon of mixed brown (1 OYR 4/3) and yellowish brown (5/4) silty clay loam; massive grading to moderate subangular blocky structure; friable; heavy redox present. Auger Test 0-10 Ap horizon of brown (I OYR 4/3) silt loam; fine subangular blocky structure; 37 friable; clear smooth boundary. 10-20 BE horizon of brown (10YR 4/3) silty clay loam; fine subangular blocky structure; friable; silt coats on faces of peds; clear smooth boundary. 20-50 Bt horizon of dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/4) silty clay loam; fine to moderate moderate subangular blocky structure; friable; gradual smooth boundary. Auger Test 0-15 Bt horizon of dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/4) silty clay loam; fine to moderate 41 subangular blocky structure; friable; gradual smooth boundary. 15-40 Bt2 horizon of yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/4) silty clay loam; moderate subangular blocky structure; friable to firm; silt coats present; gradual smooth boundary. 40-50 BC horizon of yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/4) silty clay loam; medium prismatic structure; friable; redox features present; clay skins present. Auger Test 0-10 Ap horizon of brown (I OYR 4/3) silt loam; fine subangular blocky structure; 64 friable; clear smooth boundary. 10-35 Bt horizon of dark yellowish brown (1 OYR 4/4) silty clay loam; fine to moderate subangular blocky structure; friable; gradual smooth boundary. 35-50 Bt2 horizon of yellowish brown (I OYR 5/4) silty clay loam; moderate subangular blocky structure; friable to firm. 7 OSA Technical Report 1622 y _ " T80NR06W - 35 a�. sa `-P36 ■ Kilometers 0 0.4 0.8 1.6 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Project Area Figure 1. Project location in relation to surrounding topography. Base USGS (2018), U.S. Topo 7.5'series quadrangle map. Scale 1:24,000. •' Project Area ."' . _ AW y�� Ste• - j T ■ � ! ■ _ creek . sa�'^:.;■ o T79NR06W +`,� ' ].49�ii FI¢Yn'4 �; ter¢°' i r � `-' 1.1 "• ��, $ �.■: : _ � ., .." ' h: _ . arAi.iwll:. .a:• ,.'. •-.. ... • - F4;'r =^,-B �n� 1 - '♦: �♦ I +e• + _ ..... ... .-.. a _ �„ r•r,, i � � i •: �, '� femme , Eleni Sch i �-+:� Kilometers 0 0.4 0.8 1.6 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles Project Area Figure 1. Project location in relation to surrounding topography. Base USGS (2018), U.S. Topo 7.5'series quadrangle map. Scale 1:24,000. OSA Technical Report 1622 Figure 2. Project location in relation to mapped soil type. From Iowa Cooperative Soil Survey digitization of Johnson County, base image is composite 2018 aerial photograph and I m lidar hillshade map (ISUGISRF 2020). 0 OSA Technical Report 1622 0 0 0 0 0 Meters 0 65 130 260 0 225 450 900 Feet �GNAEOLocIgT P cOil n N Project Area Woe 10 000 11; o m O 0 0 018: s�oz-c By�o Figure 3. Detail map of project area showing subsurface test locations. Base image is composite 2018 aerial photograph and 1 m lidar hillshade map (ISUGISRF 2020). 10 OSA Technical Report 1622 Figure 4. Project area photographs. Upper: project area, facing north near southern portion of project area. Lower: project area, facing east near southern portion of project area. 11 OSA Technical Report 1622 Figure S. Project area photographs. Upper: project area, facing south near northern portion of project area. Lower: project area, facing east at northern extreme of project area. 12 OSA Technical Report 1622 Appendix I: National Archeological Data Base — Reports Citation Form Complete items 3 and 5-14. The State Historic Preservation Office will record information for items 1 through 4. 1. DOCUMENT NO. 2. SOURCE 3. FILED AT Office of the State Archaeologist 700 CLSB University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242 4. UTM COORDINATES Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Zone Continuation, see 14. 5. AUTHORS Warren Davis 6. YEAR 2020 (year published) AND SHPO — ID orthing orthing orthing orthing orthing orthing 7. TITLE Phase I Intensive Archaeological Investigation of the Proposed Scott Boulevard Subdivision Project, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa 7. PUBLICATION TYPE (circle one) 4. Report Series 9. INFORMATION ABOUT PUBLISHER/PUBLICATION Follow the American Antiquity style guide for the type of publication circled. Technical Report 1622 Office of the State Archaeologist, The University of Iowa, Iowa City. 10. STATE/COUNTY (Referenced by report. Enter as many states, counties, or towns, as necessary. Enter all, if appropriate. Only enter Town if the resources considered are within the town boundaries.) STATE 1 Iowa COUNTY Johnson TOWN T79N-R6W 11. WORKTYPE f 321 PHASE I 13 OSA Technical Report 1622 12. KEYWORDS and KEYWORD CATEGORIES Enter as many keywords (with the appropriate keyword category number) as you think will help a person (1) who is trying to understand what the report contains or (2) who is searching the database for specific information. Whenever appropriate, record the number of acres studied in a document. [6 ] Project Area: 59.9 acres [ ] [ ] [ ] 13. FEDERAL AGENCY 14. CONTINUATION/COMMENTS (include item no.) FORM COMPLETED BY Name Warren Davis Date December 16, 2020 Address Office of the State Archaeologist 700 CLSB University of Iowa City Iowa City State IA Zip 52242 Telephone Number 318-384-0937 14 From: Parker, Adam G To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Proposed Residential Development Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Sunday, January 31, 20218:01:12 PM a Hello Anne/Raymond, I would like to voice my opinion, that I oppose the planned rezone area next to hickory hill park. Please forward my concerns to the planning and zoning commission, as they review the rezoning to put a through street in the are directly adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. I understand the land adjacent to Hickory Hill Park is private land, but know the land was discussed in the NE district plan httls::,//www.iowa-city.org/.../0/doc/1473770/Electronic.aspxx should preserve and buffer public lands and Hickory Hill Park. I believe the proposed development images do not accurately buffer the park and would be short sighted to land which the general public finds great utility. This would significantly impede on natural landscape and would permanently alter the watershed, prairies, and sight lines of the park. Hickory Hill Park is a treasure to this community, especially during the past year due to COVID. It often is the only "safe" respite which one can truly escape the crowd and be one in nature. I do not believe this land adjacent would be best utilized as single family plots. This would further income inequality by providing lots only the upper middle class can afford and will decrease utilization in the park as the urban sprawl approaches. I would encourage the city parks department to consider opportunities to include biking, skiing, or more trails if the land adjacent is for sale. This would be a bigger destination for the community long term utilized by more community members. If there is a better way to have my voice heard, please let me know. I look forward to participating in the planning and zoning meeting when this project is brought up. Best, Adam Parker Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: new development next to Hickory Hill Park Date: Monday, January 4, 2021 1:15:35 PM Attachments: imaae002.pno image003.pnng imaae004.pno image005.pnng imaae006.pno FYI From: Anne Russett Sent: Monday, January 4, 20211:15 PM To: 'Teresa Galluzzo' <tegallu@gmail.com> Subject: RE: new development next to Hickory Hill Park Hi, Teresa — Thanks for your message. I've received a few other emails regarding the proposed rezoning. City staff is still working with the applicant on the proposed concept and we have also requested some additional information regarding their rezoning application. At this point, I don't know when this will be before the Planning and Zoning Commission. You can sign-up for e -subscriptions to keep informed of the items of upcoming Commission meetings: httDs://www.icaov.ora/e-subscriDtions Thanks. And let me know if you have any questions. Anne QTY OF IOWA CITy Anne Russett, AICP Senior Planner UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE She/Her/Hers WWW.ICGOV.ORG p:319-356-5251 410 E Washington St Iowa City, IA 52240 From: Teresa Galluzzo <tegallu(@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 4, 202112:56 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(@iowa-city.org> Subject: new development next to Hickory Hill Park Hi Anne, I am writing because I am concerned about the plans for the houses being built next to Hickory Hill Park. This park is a refuge for so many people. A place to find peace, solve life problems, listen to birds, and feel like you are in the wild even in the middle of Iowa City. It is unlike any other park in the area. I am sad to know the hay fields on the Northeast side of the park will be developed at all, but I am particularly worried that houses are being proposed right next to the park boundary. (On the version of the plans I saw, it is lots 14 to 28 in particular that seem intrusive to HHP.) I would like to see a buffer between HHP and the houses to help preserve some of the feeling of being able to get lost in the park and in your own thoughts, so after a trip to Hickory Hill folks can return to their work and family with more energy and clearer thinking. Thanks for considering my concerns. Sincerely, Teresa Galluzzo Iowa City resident and longtime HHP visitor From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: Zoning near Hickory Hill Park Date: Tuesday, January 19, 20218:43:34 AM Can you please follow-up with Adam? From: Parker, Adam G <adam-parker@uiowa.edu> Sent: Monday, January 18, 20218:36 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Zoning near Hickory Hill Park t R4�K Hello Anne, I am looking to inquire about the rezoning of land North East of Hickory Hill Park? Is there a place I can go to access information about what the proposed rezoning of the area is going to be? Appreciate any insight and guidance. Best, Adam Parker Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. From: Parker, Adam G To: Raymond Heitner Cc: Anne Russett Subject: Re: [External] Zoning near Hickory Hill Park Date: Tuesday, January 19, 20219:19:47 AM Attachments: imaae001.ona image002.png imaae003.Dna image004.png imaae005.Dna Great, thank you for following up. I am fairly new to planning and zoning, but it appears there will be a meeting this Thursday (third Thursday of the month) Where would I find the agenda or "staff report" for this Thursday's meeting? Or is that accessible prior to the meeting to know what will be discussed. Apologize for the inconvenience of walking me through a website. (I hate doing it for clients I serve, but I genuinely do not see it, just the meeting on Jan 21 discussion) Also, assuming a zoom link will be added to the web to attend Thursday? Additionally, is the board considering the Iowa City district plan with the development? I understand the land looking to be developed is private land, but hope the considerations of the community will be taken into account by following the Iowa City district plan which had significant community input. Lastly, when and for how long will the community be able to know and provide feedback for the new development? I guess I am more curious, as to what will be developed there if the community has a voice with how it is developed? Thanks, Adam From: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 at 9:00 AM To: "Parker, Adam G" <adam-parker@uiowa.edu> Cc: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: [External] Zoning near Hickory Hill Park Good Morning Adam, Anne forwarded me your question about the rezoning northeast of Hickory Hill Park. We are currently working with the applicant on a few details pertaining to their concept plan for this rezoning application. We do not have a date for when the rezoning application will be presented to the City's Planning and Zoning Commission. You can check the following website for information on when the application will be heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission. https://www.icgov.org/city-government/boards/planning-and- zoning -commission The link above will also provide the City's staff report and meeting packet by 5:OOPM on the Friday prior to each meeting (P&Z meetings occur the first and third Thursday of each month). The meeting packet will provide information on how to participate in the Commission's zoom meeting. If you have any questions or comments that you would like sent to the Commission for consideration, please feel free to email me, and I will forward your comments onto the Commission. Ray He tner Associate Planner (he/him/his) 319.356.5238 raymond-heitner(@iowa-city.org 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 d "HZ3Cb [11Y bF t i r r RA 7"DE WWW.ICGOV.ORG f Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: ACT development Date: Monday, January 25, 20215:01:50 PM Attachments: Notice.docx Ray — Please see the email below. I've created the attached for him. What do you think? From: Casey James Kohrt <cjkohrt@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 25, 20213:59 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Re: ACT development fi i That would be great. On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 3:36 PM Anne Russett <Anne-RussettPiowa-city.org> wrote: Hi, Casey — At the moment, I don't have any extra rezoning signs to put out there. We've had several that were damaged and destroyed this winter. One idea is to put some notices in the kiosks as trail heads. If that's something you'd like to do I could put together a PDF with some general information that you could print to put in a kiosk. Thanks, Anne From: Casey James Kohrt <cjkohrt(@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 25, 20212:33 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(@iowa-cit)1.org> Subject: Re: ACT development Hi Anne, It is the Friends of Hickory Hill Park's request for two additional signs to be placed in the park to make the general public aware of the application for rezoning of the property. We feel the current single sign does not inform the general public of the full scope of the land potentially being developed. Therefore, would it be possible for additional signage to be placed inside the park to notify the public? We would be happy to pick up the signage at a City office and have it placed in the park by a member of Friends of Hickory Hill Park Board. Best, Casey Chair, FHHP On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 2:52 PM Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(@iowa-city.org> wrote: H i, Casey — We have a received a rezoning application for this land. At this point, I don't know when it will be on a Planning and Zoning Commission agenda. You can sign up for e -subscriptions, though, so you can keep track of when Commission agendas are published: https://www.icgov.org/e-subscriptions Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Anne From: Casey James Kohrt <cikohrt(cDgmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 202110:03 AM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(@iowa-cit)1.org> Subject: ACT development AI Hi Anne, Has anything been filed with the City yet on the ACT -owned land by developer Joe Clark? Do you have an estimate of when that might happen? Casey Kohrt Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. From: Parker, Adam G To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: [External] RE: Proposed Residential Development Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:26:08 AM Attachments: imaae001.p_na imaae002.pnna imaae003.p_na imaae004.pnna imaae005.p_na I Hello Ray, I appreciate you forwarding my concerns to the P&Z commission/City Council. Best, Adam From: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Date: Monday, February 1, 2021 at 10:21 AM To: "Parker, Adam G" <adam-parker@uiowa.edu>, Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa- city.org> Subject: [External] RE: Proposed Residential Development Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Good Morning Adam, Thank you for your comments on the proposed residential development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. Your comments will be forwarded on to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. The rezoning will have public hearings by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, with opportunities for direct public comment at both stages. We do not have a date set for the application to appear before the Planning and Zoning Commission. If you want to keep track of Planning and Zoning Commission agendas, I would recommend you sign up to receive an email notice whenever a Commission packet is published: https:,//www.icgov.org/e-subscriptions. Meetings are held the first and third Thursday of each month. You can also email any correspondence you may have for the Planning and Zoning Commission to my email address raymond-heitneri Thank you, Ray He tner Associate Planner (he/him/his) 319.356.5238 ravmond-heitner(@iowa-city.org 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 _=10 A CITY A LI HZ i CCI {r ?7 CI LITE RA 7LRE WWW.ICGOV.ORG From: Parker, Adam G <adam-parker@uiowa.edu> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 20218:01 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org>; Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa- city.org> Subject: Proposed Residential Development Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park fi i l�l$ki Hello Anne/Raymond, I would like to voice my opinion, that I oppose the planned rezone area next to hickory hill park. Please forward my concerns to the planning and zoning commission, as they review the rezoning to put a through street in the are directly adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. I understand the land adjacent to Hickory Hill Park is private land, but know the land was discussed in the NE district plan https://www.iowa-city.org/.../0/doc/1473770/Electronic.aspx should preserve and buffer public lands and Hickory Hill Park. I believe the proposed development images do not accurately buffer the park and would be short sighted to land which the general public finds great utility. This would significantly impede on natural landscape and would permanently alter the watershed, prairies, and sight lines of the park. Hickory Hill Park is a treasure to this community, especially during the past year due to COVID. It often is the only "safe" respite which one can truly escape the crowd and be one in nature. I do not believe this land adjacent would be best utilized as single family plots. This would further income inequality by providing lots only the upper middle class can afford and will decrease utilization in the park as the urban sprawl approaches. I would encourage the city parks department to consider opportunities to include biking, skiing, or more trails if the land adjacent is for sale. This would be a bigger destination for the community long term utilized by more community members. If there is a better way to have my voice heard, please let me know. I look forward to participating in the planning and zoning meeting when this project is brought up. Best, Adam Parker Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. From: Mary Winder To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: views regarding development near Hickory Hill Park Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 1:36:35 PM RI$H Feb. 2, 2021 Dear Anne Russett and Ray Heitner: I am writing to you about the housing development being proposed for land along the northeast border of Hickory Hill Park. To give you a bit of background, I grew up in Iowa City and spent many, many happy times in Hickory Hill Park through the years. I like that park so much, in fact, that I held my wedding there! I have moved away from Iowa City, but every single time I return for a visit, taking a walk at Hickory Hill Park is always at the top of my list of things to do. I have often marveled at the forethought of the people who preserved this wild patch of woods, fields, hills, and creeks for the benefit of the community and the wildlife. It is a unique and very precious treasure in the Iowa City community. I understand that land around the park will be developed, but I am very concerned when I read that the proposed design that the developer is presenting for the housing development area along the northeast border of the park does not follow the guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan that has been established by the City. This is extremely unwise, and it is wrong, as the guidelines were put in place for good reason. It is vital that they be followed. I am writing to ask you to please require that the development plan be revised so that it does follow the appropriate guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, allowing Hickory Hill Park to retain its "natural and wild" character as opposed to being hemmed in closely by a poorly planned residential development that does not follow the City's own guidelines. Now is the time to require revision of the development plan. Once the land has been rezoned and the development is in place, it will be too late to say to yourself, "Gosh, I wish we had done this differently." Jackie Joyner-Kersee said, "It's better to look ahead and prepare, than to look back and regret." Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or need clarification. Thank you for taking time to read my views on this important matter. Sincerely, Mary Winder 785-985-2519 From: Stella Hart To: anne-russetCa)iowa-city.org; Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Park Date: Monday, February 8, 20215:51:29 PM Hello! I'm writing to express my strong opposition to any rezoning or development of Hickory Hill Park. It really is a very special place in our community, and losing any part of it would be devastating. Thank you for your consideration and all you do for the city. Stella Hart 1331 Dodge Street Ct Iowa City, IA 52245 This email is from an external source. From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: Proposed land development Date: Tuesday, February 9, 20218:51:04 AM Can you please follow-up with this person if you haven't, yet. From: Jorgensen, Shea M <shea-jorgensen@uiowa.edu> Sent: Saturday, February 6, 20211:34 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org>; ray-heitner@iowa-city.org Subject: Proposed land development i RE'&ii Dear Ms. Russett and Mr. Heitner, My family lives in Iowa City and we frequent Hickory Hills, as well as other natural areas in town, at least weekly with our 2 -year-old. One of our favorite aspects of Iowa City is the nature built into the city, especially places we can easily walk to, like Hickory Hills. I am very concerned about the encroachment of the residential development proposal adjacent to Hickory Hills. I don't believe the developer's proposed design is an adequate buffer and it would be a shame to lose another of the few natural places remaining in the city. I hope that we can protect what is left of our wild areas for future generations. Once they are developed, they will never be reclaimed. On behalf of my 2 -year-old and all the kids who benefit from natural places in the city, thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Shea Jorgensen, MD Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and From: Kristen Morrow To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Subject: Hickory Hill Land Development Date: Tuesday, February 9, 20217:09:01 PM a Hello Mr. Heitner and Ms. Russett, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed rezoning and housing development on the land directly abutting Hickory Hill. I am very concerned with the lack of buffer between this development and the park, and I feel that this development would bring irreparable harm to the sense of wildness one can feel while hiking Hickory Hill's more remote trails. Like many residents in my generation, I yearn for more wild places, more trails, more public lands and parks. This sentiment seems to be growing, especially in light of the pandemic, as more and more people are finding refuge in the natural world. While I greatly value the Iowa City parks that are available to me, it's hard not to feel the tug of cities that have placed greater value on keeping wild corridors. For the sake of Iowa City's residents, wildlife, and reputation, I think it would be a great mistake if this development were allowed to carve out some of the remaining wild spaces we have. Thank you for your time, Kristen Morrow "There can be no purpose more enspiriting than to begin the age of restoration, reweaving the wondrous diversity of life that still surrounds us. " - E. O. Wilson. From: Lutaendorf, Philip A To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Cc: friends. hh.parKbgmaiLcom; Lutgendorf, Susan K Subject: Rezoning the field adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Tuesday, February 9, 20218:28:07 PM Dear Ms. Russett and Mr. Heitner, As a nearby resident and frequent walker in Hickory Hill Park, I am deeply troubled by the current rezoning request that would allow a developer to put fifty four houses and a street into the fairly narrow field adjoining the park on its northeast side. I knew something like this was coming when I repeatedly saw an "Axiom" truck in the field just south of the new Oaknoll East facility during the summer, with people taking measurements, but I did not guess the extent of the development they want to build. In my experience over nearly four decades, the City has given up several opportunities to preserve, through the acquisition of former farms, a larger belt of greenspace that would enhance the quality of life for residents and prevent our area becoming part of continuous semi -urban sprawl, especially to the east and north. Approving the present request—the density of which I understand to violate the City's own Northeast District Plan and its mandate for "conservation residential design," as well as its Comprehensive Plan—would be yet another failure of vision, and loss of an opportunity to enhance Iowa City's livability and recreational opportunities for present and future residents. If there is more that I can do (in our present situation of limited social interaction) to register my concern over and opposition to this proposed rezoning, please let me know. Thanking you, Philip Lutgendorf 2 Glendale Court Iowa City (52245) 319 541-5145 From: Shelly Carpenter To: Raymond Heitner Subject: REZ20-0016 Hickory Trail Estates Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 1:41:46 PM a Dear Mr. Heitner In response to the notice we received regarding the proposal to rezone the area around Scott Blvd. and 1 st Ave. on the east side of Iowa City we would like to express our concern about how the planned rezoning would affect Hickory Hill park and surrounding areas. We oppose any rezoning that would have construction butting up against city preserve and park land. Also we would request that any development approaching the park be done with single -loaded streets to allow for a natural buffer between park grounds and housing developments. Thank you. Shelly & Marty Carpenter 1035 Tamarack Trail Shelly Carpenter, M.S. Certified Wellness Coach and Yoga Instructor www.wellfinii 319.330.8382 0 From: Erin Durian To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Rezoning Message Date: Wednesday, February 10, 20215:43:45 PM I RdS� Mr. Heitner, I am writing to you about the proposed development in the area behind Hickory Hill Park. I believe that this space is vital for the neighborhood community and should not be further developed. Please share these comments with the Commission. Over the years, this space has been important to me personally but I have also been observing its importance to others. One of the reasons I love living in this neighborhood is the proximity to nature and in the summer and spring and fall, my preferred walk when I'm feeling stressed, overwhelmed, or sad is through Hickory Hill to the Big Field that opens up. This space always feels magical because of its isolation and its expansive presence close to a busy street. On the days I come up, I'll sit at the top of the hill- sometimes for an hour or two- and appreciate the sound of the birds and the quiet, of being surrounded by trees. I'll observe the plants that grow and the animals that sneak by. I've seen deer, owls, a fox come into the clearing and walk along known pathways so I know they also appreciate the quiet and the trees. I'll see families taking a walk together with their dog leaping beside them (the dog is always particularly stupefied by the amount of open space to run). I'll wave hello and listen to their soft footsteps in the grass allowing my mind to relax, observe, and appreciate what we have around us. This space is a sanctuary for the residents of this neighborhood and their families as well as for the wildlife that travels between the park and other wooded areas. I believe the value of this place is greater as it is, than it would be with another street of houses. Please reconsider developing this area as it holds a special place in my heart. Thank you, Erin Durian 51 Hickory PI From: Jason Naooli To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Rezoning Near 1st Avenue and Scott Boulevard Date: Tuesday, February 9, 20215:25:47 PM Attachments: imaae004.pna image005.pno imaae001.pna image002.pno imaae003.pna Thank you for the follow-up regarding this matter. Would you be able to help interpret this new plat proposal? It appears that lot 45 now contains ten separate homes. Is there a reason and/or strategy for that? Furthermore, it appears the numbering of the lots has changed since the original proposal, which is concerning since my initial message to Anne identified lots 14-28 as not following the concept of a single - loaded street development. The lots that are now of concern are 26-44. If other residents previously expressed concern about specific lots can we be sure the numbering change will be taken into consideration by the Commission? Thank you again for reconnecting. As previously mentioned, it is concerning how far this proposal is from the established NE District Plan for the Bluffwood area and I hope the Planning & Zoning Commission will follow the established guidelines when developing against city preserve. All the best, Jason On Monday, February 8, 2021, 02:39:51 PM CST, Raymond Heitner <raymond-heitner@iowa-city.org> wrote: All, Please see the attached neighbor notification letter for the rezoning application near the intersection of 1 st Avenue and Scott Boulevard. The attached letter contains information pertaining to the currently scheduled meeting date and time that the rezoning will be discussed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The letter also contains information on how to access and participate in the meeting. Please feel free to email me any additional comments that you might like the Commission to consider in its evaluation of this application. Thank you, Ray Heitner Anne Russett From: Casey James Kohrt <cjkohrt@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 6:53 PM To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Cc: fhhp-board@googlegroups.com Subject: Friends of Hickory Hill Park Response to Proposed Rezoning Ar R]SK Anne and Ray, Please include this letter among items being provided to P&Z commission. I hope all responses to this proposal are being provided to the commission, are they? Friends of Hickory Hill Park is opposed to the planned rezoning of the land South of Scott Boulevard and West of 1st avenue. This current proposed plat for "Hickory Trail Estates" is in opposition to the NE District Plan and the Comprehensive Plan. It has been opined that these plans are dated, and should be ignored. If this is the case, we will ask City officials to re -open the NE District Plan and Comprehensive Plan before this goes through, as we feel this still reflects the view of most citizens in how City development takes place. Protecting the viewshed of the park was central to the plan. The NE District Plan calls for (image from plan): Preserve natural features. Conservation design of residential developments is a key feature of the future land use scenario for the Bluf-Nvood Neighborhood. To preserve sensitive areas, cul-de-sac streets and single -loaded streets are proposed where appropriate. Open spaces are shown in areas containing wooded ravines and boggy, potential wetland areas; as a buffer along the east and north edges of Hickory Hill Park where it abuts the Larson tract; and encompassing the 100 year floodplain along Ralston Creek and its tributaries. The pond on the Kral I farm is featured as a focal point within a allowed on First Avenue in the vicinity of the park. A conservation residential design is proposed on the property between First Avenue and Hickory Hill Park to provide a buffer between the residential development and the park. Create and enhance neighborhood partes within the district. Natural open SpacelBufferAreas. In the Bluffwood Neighborhood, the plan calls forbuffering green space to be provided between Hickory Hill Park and residential development on the south and west portions of the Larson tract. One goal of this buffer is to minimize the visibility of residential develop- ment from the park. This can be accomplished by shifting density on the Larson property away from the park and aligning it in slightly higher densities (townhouses and small apartment houses) along the adjacent arterial streets. A larger buffer area for the park on the Larson tract may be possible if the property owner consents to a greater transfer in density or there is private and/or public purchase of a portion of the property. No direct vehicular access to the park or through streets adjacent to the park are proposed. Instead, the residential development nearest the park is shown on cul-de-sac streets and pedestrian access to Hickory Hill Park is encouraged. Environmentally sensitive areas, such as flood- plain and wetlands along Ralston Creek and wooded ravines, are preserved as open space. Conserva- 6b tr , The comprehensive plan calls for: Comprehensive Plan htt s://wwwS.iowa- cit .or /Web Lin k/01edoc/19321601Section%2010%20Parks%20and%200 en%20S ace%2012.2019. df Parks and Open Space Goals and Strategies: Improve overall access to and awareness of parks. - Discourage parks that are surrounded by private property; encourage development of parks with single -loaded street access It has been suggested by City Staff that more current code regarding cul-de-sacs would negate these plans. We disagree. There is language that addresses environmental concerns: 15-3-2: STREETS AND CIRCULATION: A. Connectivity Of Streets, Sidewalks, And Trails: Subdivisions shall provide for continuation and extension of arterial, collector and local streets, sidewalks and trails in accordance with the following standards: 4. Use of cul-de-sacs and other roadways with a single point of access should be avoided. Cul�de- sacs will be considered where it can be clearly denlonstrated that environmental constraints, existing development, access limitations along arterial streets, or other unusual features prevent the extension of the street to the property line or to interconnect with other streets within or abutting the subdivision. We therefore 'feel that environmental constraints described, along with non-compliance with NE District Plan and Comprehensive Plan ideals, we firmly reject this proposal. If this rezoning is to be approved, we first ask the City P&Z Commission and City Council to re -open the plan concepts before any consideration is made, to affirm how the citizens of Iowa City would like to see development happen. We are not anti -development, but ask that development be done in accordance with the NE District and Comprehensive Plans. CaseyJames Kohrt, for Friends of Hickory Hill Park. From: Ben Berger To: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: REZ20-0016 Hickory Trail Estates Date: Thursday, February 11, 20219:28:29 AM RI$H Hi Raymond, I received your letter in the mail about the potential rezoning for Hickory Trail Estates. Thank you for reaching out and allowing the public to voice their opinions. While I do not disagree with development in our community, I do want it to be done in areas that do not impact housing and the environment that is already present. With the new proposed development, I am very concerned about the impact it will have on the environment and Hickory Hill Park. I very much enjoy walking through the park and admiring the natural haven that it provides for humans and nature. I fear that by placing a housing development right along the border of the park, we as a community will negatively affect the animals and their homes. Another very real concern is the added traffic on N. 1 st Ave. Traffic on this street is already very busy and more often than not far exceeding the posted speed limits. I have 3 young children, and I am always concerned about the traffic on this street. Adding the development will increase traffic volumes and I believe just lead to additional issues. The way that the development road will be placed I believe will create an avenue of least resistance to Eastbound traffic on Scott. At night when the stop at N. 1 st Ave and Scott becomes backed up, traffic will just shoot down the neighborhood and to the intersection at Hickory Trail and N. 1 st Ave. I have approached the city about traffic calming on N. 1 st Ave before, but have not seen any attempts to control it. What is the city planning to do with the increased traffic and speeds? I hope they have a suggestion. Finally, I purchased my house on N. 1 st Ave because of the great views out the back of the lot (ravine) and across the street to the open field and trees. This development will negatively affect my view across the street and I will be forced to look at a large building development. My suggestion is the city looks to rezone and develop elsewhere. Leave nature alone and do not impact an area that so many people of the community love and enjoy. Thank you. Ben Berger From: karen.nichols To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Development along Hickory Hill Park Date: Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:26:33 AM Dear Ms. Russett, Mr. Heitner, and members of the Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission: I am writing in opposition to the rezoning request for a residential housing development along the northeast border of Hickory Hill Park. I am not opposed to development near the park in general, but do object to the proposed development as currently presented. Based on images of the plan I have seen, it does not seem to adhere to the recommendations in the Northeast District Plan or the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Northeast District Plan calls for a "conservation residential design" in the neighborhood that provides a buffer between the residential development and the park. The City's Comprehensive Plan, when discussing Parks and Open Space Goals and Strategies, discourages parks that are surrounded by private property and encourages development of parks with single loaded street access. The developer's proposed design does not seem to adhere to either of these plans. Hickory Hill park is a jewel of Iowa City and one of the reasons our family stays here. Considerable community effort has gone into protecting and maintaining the park over many decades. Developers, planners, and other city leaders must respect the wishes of the community as expressed in the Northeast District Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan, which set forth guidelines that residents expect to be followed in developing land near the park. Please require that the developer's plans be reworked to adhere to our city's expressed guidelines. Thank you. With warmest regards, Karen Nichols Communications Professional 1740 F Street Iowa City, IA 52240 641.781.8506 karen.nichols@pm.me she/her/hers Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. From: Veronica Bolinger To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Park Proposed Rezoning Concerns Date: Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:26:24 PM RI$H To Whom it may Concern, I am concerned about the rezoning request for new development near Hickory Hill Park, this proposal does not comply with the NE District plan, or the Comprehensive Plan and needs to be reworked. These plans were put in place to protect and minimize the impact to Hickory Hill Park and they should absolutely be followed and the diverging from these stated goals shows a lack of integrity to our citizens and community. I would appreciate it if you would forward my concerns onto the Planning and Zoning team. A concerned citizen, Veronica Bolinger From: Jesse Thomas To: Anne Russett Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Proposed development of Hickory Hill Park Date: Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:50:23 PM Attachments: imaae002.Dna image003.pnng imaae004.Dna image005.pnng imaae006.Dno Thanks for the option Anne. I would prefer to retract my first statement and just make a broad comment based on what little I know of the project right now: 1. I'm in favor of Hickory hill park growing. 2. I'm against boxing in the park which could reduce its expansion options in the future 3. I would prefer we avoid more low-density development or road laying but if we cannot avoid it I would insist that we take every opportunity to build dedicated and separate bicycle infrastructure so we don't need to share the road with car users. This is the first time in 20 years I've paid attention. I'll tune in closely so I can make more educated comments next time. Thank you Jesse On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:22 PM Anne Russett <Anne-Russettna.iowa-city.org> wrote: Hi, Jesse — Would you like me to share this correspondence with the Commission? If you'd like to revise your statement for me to share with the Commission you could do that, as well. Thanks, Anne From: Jesse Thomas <jessemacfarlane&gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:14 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett&iowa-city.org> Subject: Re: Proposed development of Hickory Hill Park Thanks for the clarification Anne I was confused about the facts there. I'm reassured to hear you would grow the park... let's do it! Jesse On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:44 AM Anne Russett <Anne-Russett&iowa-city.org> wrote: Hi, Jesse — Thank you for your email. We will forward it to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration. wanted to clarify that the proposal does not turn over any of the existing parkland to development. I would increase the size of the park by 10 acres. That said, the development is adjacent to the park. Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Anne CITY OF IOWA CiTy Anne Russett, AICP UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE Senior Planner WWW.ICGOV.ORG She/Her/Hers 00*0 p:319-356-5251 410 E Washington St Iowa City, IA 52240 From: Jesse Thomas <� semacfarlane&gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 20219:59 AM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett&iowa-city.org> Subject: Proposed development of Hickory Hill Park Hello Anne, Would you please forward this to the Planning and Zoning Commission? I am the owner of 625 S Governor St and I think that turning over any part of Hickory Hill Park to development would be a huge mistake. It goes without saying that HHP is a beloved benefit for the entire community in any year but to think of encroaching on the park after living through Covid is shocking and hurtful to put it mildly. There areos in areas in our city already bulldozed, paved, and vacant that can accept such a development. In order to lead the state in equity and human happiness, we need to increase the density of what we have already developed, decrease our automobile dependence, and increase the leisure spaces and our access to them with bicycle highways and free bussing. I use every acre of Hickory Hill park every month of the year and I would be extremely sad to see more wasteful sprawl continue to make a mockery of our "Athens of the Midwest" reputation. Jesse Thomas Resident Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. From: Hillary Schofield To: anne-russet(@iowa-city.ora; Raymond Heitner Subject: Proposed Residential Development Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Thursday, February 11, 2021 1:00:44 PM RI$H Dear Anne and Ray, I am writing to express my disapproval of the proposed development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. I explore and walk the trails of HHP frequently. It is a precious source of renewal in Iowa City, without having to travel very far. It is so important to have this kind of refuge in town, and not only for humans, but for all the other creatures that are trying to persist and thrive despite the ever -encroaching spread of human settlement. A development so close and so elaborate would undoubtedly have a negative domino effect on the ecosystem of the Park. My strong feelings aside, this plan does not comply with the Northeast District Plan, nor the Comprehensive Plan; these need to be followed in order to minimize the damage to this dearly valued part of Iowa City. I ask that you please pass along these comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Many thanks for your time, Hillary From: Anne Russett To: "nancy footner" Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: RE: Hickory Hill Park proposed development Date: Thursday, February 11, 2021 1:04:33 PM Thanks, Nancy. We will pass this along to the Commission. Anne From: nancy footner <nfootner@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 202112:47 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Hickory Hill Park proposed development R]Sk{ Dear Ms Russett, I am writing to protest the proposed development on the NE side of Hickory Hill Park. This plan completely violates both terms laid out in the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan and the NE District plan. Please forward this email to all the members of the Planning and Zoning committee and the City Council. The proposal must be rejected. Hickory Hill Park is a precious natural area and must be protected from any further encroachment by development. Nancy Footner Iowa City Citizen 2008 Dunlap Ct, Iowa City, IA 52245 319 3382674 From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: Hickory Hill Development Date: Thursday, February 11, 20212:24:32 PM Please include with Commission correspondence. From: Susannah Neal <susannahgkneal@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 20212:04 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Hickory Hill Development fi R�S�[ Dear Ms Russett As a citizen of Iowa City I am writing to object to the proposed development that borders Hickory Hill Park. This proposed development does not comply with the NE Plan nor does it comply to the Comprehensive Plans. Those plans were put in place to protect HHP and by breaching these plans this development is in violation of those plans. Please immediately reverse the course of this egregious development plan. Respectfully, Susannah Neal 1133 Chamberlain Drive Iowa City, IA 52240 From: Heather McKnight To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Date: Thursday, February 11, 20213:56:07 PM Anne and Raymond, I am writing to you to express my dismay at the proposed rezoning of land adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. Hickory Hill is an oasis within the city. A sprawling park where I and my kids wander aimlessly and discover new delights. We have seen foxes, deer and numerous other wildlife. It is a special retreat and I fear a rezoning would be very disruptive to the rugged and wild landscape and wildlife. This proposal does not comply with the NE District plan, nor the Comprehensive Plan and I strongly encourage the proposal not be accepted. Please share my feedback with planning and zoning. Thank you, Heather Sent from my iPhone This email is from an external source. From: Messingham, Kelly To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Trail rezoning project by Axiom consultants Date: Thursday, February 11, 20214:19:03 PM To: Iowa City Planning and Rezoning Commission and City Council c/o Anne Russett and Raymond-Heitner We are writing to convey our objection to the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres on the SW corner of Scott Blvd and N 1st Ave by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension. The proposed development, with up to 50 single family lots and a senior living facility with 120 units, does not comply with the NE District plan and the Comprehensive plan set forth by the City. The original plan specified development of a short cul -de -sac -no longer than 900 feet. These original plans were put into place to minimize the impact of development on HHP, and should be followed. HHP is a unique urban park that should be protected. A larger buffer is necessary to diminish city noise within the park and elimination of the buffer zone to the proposed 35-48 feet (in some areas) will have a direct impact on wildlife that travel between the park and surrounding areas on a daily basis. Additionally, we live immediately adjacent to the site to be developed and this extensive increase in housing density will dramatically increase noise and traffic in the area, with a negative impact on both HHP and the traffic on Scott Blvd. Please do not hesitate to reach out with any questions. Thank you. Kelly Messingham Michael Messingham 64 Hickory Heights Lane Iowa City, IA 52245 Ph. 319.594.6611 keliv-messinaham(@uiowa.edu michaelmessingham@gmail.com Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. From: Emily Schacht To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Date: Thursday, February 11, 20214:31:59 PM i To: Iowa City Planning and Rezoning Commission and City Council I'd like to express my objection to the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres on the SW corner of Scott Blvd and N 1st Ave by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension. The proposed development, with up to 50 single family lots and a senior living facility with 120 units does not comply with the NE District plan and the Comprehensive plan set forth by the City. These original plans were put into place to minimize the impact of development on Hickory Hill Park, and should be followed. Hickory HIII Park is a unique urban park that should be protected. A larger buffer is necessary to diminish city noise within the park and elimination of the buffer zone to the proposed 35-48 feet (in some areas) will have a direct impact on wildlife that travel between the park and surrounding areas on a daily basis. I am not opposed to development in general, and believe development is necessary for our town to continue to retain its current residents and attract new ones. However, development needs to be done thoughtfully, which is what the NE District plan and Comprehensive City plan accomplish. These plans should be followed. Please forward my comment to the Planning and Rezoning Commission and City Council. Sincerely, Emily Campbell 328 N 7th Ave, Iowa City, IA From: kristen Nelson -Boutros To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Proposed Rezoning and Development Date: Thursday, February 11, 20214:45:17 PM Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org and Raymond-heitner@iowa-city.org To: Iowa City Planning and Rezoning Commission and City Council We are writing to convey our objection to the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres on the SW corner of Scott Blvd and N 1st Ave by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension. The proposed development, with up to 50 single family lots and a senior living facility with 120 units, does not comply with the the NE District plan and the Comprehensive plan set forth by the City. The original plan specified development of a short cul -de -sac -no longer than 900 feet. These original plans were put into place to minimize the impact of development on Hickory Hills Park (HHP), and should be followed. HHP is a unique urban park that should be protected. A larger buffer is necessary to diminish city noise within the park and elimination of the buffer zone to the proposed 35-48 feet (in some areas) will have a direct impact on wildlife that travel between the park and surrounding areas on a daily basis. Additionally, we live immediately adjacent to the site to be developed and this extensive increase in housing density will dramatically increase noise and traffic in the area, with a negative impact on both HHP and the traffic on Scott Blvd. Sincerely, Kristen Nelson -Boutros Rami Boutros Get Outlook for iOS From: Robin Kopelman To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Hickory Hill Park area rezoning Date: Thursday, February 11, 20214:59:11 PM To: Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council: We are writing to convey our objection to the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres on the SW corner of Scott Blvd and N 1 st Ave by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension. The proposed development, with up to 50 single family lots and a senior living facility with 120 units, does not comply with the NE District plan and the Comprehensive plan set forth by the City. The original plan specified development of a short cul -de -sac -no longer than 900 feet. These original plans were put into place to minimize the impact of development on HHP, and should be followed. HHP is a unique urban park that should be protected. A larger buffer is necessary to diminish city noise within the park and elimination of the buffer zone to the proposed 35-48 feet (in some areas) will have a direct impact on wildlife that travel between the park and surrounding areas on a daily basis. Additionally, we speak as a family who lives adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. We share concerns with other adjacent neighborhoods that the extensive increase in housing density will dramatically increase noise and traffic in the area, with a negative impact on both HHP and the traffic on Scott Blvd. and 1 st Ave.. Our six family members are daily users of the park, whether as recreational hikers, XC skiers, responsible dog walkers, sledders, and trail runners. I (Robin) also co -lead the Iowa City Trail Sisters, an all -women's trail running group who regularly runs in and loves this wild area deeply. For these reasons, we are concerned it will severely impact the wildlife habitat, negatively impact the quality of the park experience, and be detrimental to the already poor water quality of Ralston Creek. Please forward our comments. Sincerely, Robin and Todd Kopelman 523 Woodridge Avenue Iowa City Sent from my iPhone This email is from an external source. From: Mark Renshaw To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner; Bruce Teague Subject: Rezoning Date: Thursday, February 11, 20218:00:22 PM To: Iowa City Planning and Rezoning Commission and City Council I am writing to contest and oppose the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres on the SW corner of Scott Boulevard and N 1st Avenue by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension. The proposed rezoning and development, with up to 50 single family lots and a senior living facility with 120 units, does not comply with the the NE District Plan and the Comprehensive Plan set forth by the City of Iowa City. The original plans specified development of a short cul -de -sac -no longer than 900 feet, and were developed to minimize the impact of on Hickory Hills Park. If this space is to be developed, these original plans must be followed. Our Hickory Hills Park is a unique urban park that should be protected. A larger buffer is necessary to diminish city noise within the park and elimination of the buffer zone to the proposed 35-48 feet (in some areas) will have a direct impact on wildlife that travel between the park and surrounding areas. Additionally, my property is immediately adjacent to the site to be developed and this extensive increase in housing density will dramatically increase noise and traffic in the area, with a negative impact on both Hickory Hills Park and traffic on Scott Boulevard. Sincerely, Mark Renshaw 72 Hickory Heights Lane Iowa City, Iowa This email is from an external source. From: Bruce Teague To: Mark Renshaw; Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Rezoning Date: Thursday, February 11, 20218:22:31 PM Attachments: OutlookEmoi i -1554175382453692d 126f-b36d-4eda-ba bd-Of306Of207ce. ong OutlookEmoji-1554175382453074ba4ce-9234-4274-9637-aa0aebcO5576. png OutlookEmoii-15541753824534c39b404-ae lf-45ae-b633-343d56495d4a. ong OutlookEmoji-1554175382453b45f3bO8-f3Oa-4ebe-897f-9445fc8ace4f. [ng OutlookEmoii-1554175382453aO398783-e4e2-4f62-99a9-06452cO2dO67.ong OutlookEmoji-1554175382453e323ed 16-9e35-4f52-aaO6-361cf68c4e59. png OutlookEmoii-1554175382453dde46e65-eb31-45el-a249-f58094elcOd6.ong OutlookEmoji-155417538245367aed794-3e7c-4608-9056-2a5589e5e6b3. png OutlookEmoii-1554175382453a419b920-12c8-4663-ab60-853ac4c91599.ong OutlookEmoii-15541753824533aaObfO7-2022-4c92-a736-5452034d69fd.png OutlookEmoii-1554175382453fae27209-c22b-4b3d-bccl-0361 b217bcde. ong OutlookEmoi i-155417538245319745814-5f90-4f63-aadf-8aOd 3471 bb86. Ing OutlookEmoii-15541753824535b9a9ec7-b9a4-445a-b58a-7a5cecdOf68d.Dng Thanks for reaching out and sharing your concerns. I hear you! This project will first be at our Planning and Zoning Commission and must pass there before it comes to council. I would encourage you to share your concerns with Commissioners through email, calls, and/or when this item is on their agenda. Sincerely, Mayor Bruce Teague (He/Him/His) Iowa City City Council Member - At Large 1-319-536-1200 410 E. Washington St. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 WWW.ICGOV.ORG =10W CITY A UN[SC10 trFY of LIrEItAF.UA[ Notice: Please be advised this email communication may be public information. From: Mark Renshaw <markrenshaw@me.com> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 20218:00:00 PM To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner; Bruce Teague Subject: Rezoning To: Iowa City Planning and Rezoning Commission and City Council I am writing to contest and oppose the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres on the SW corner of Scott Boulevard and N 1 st Avenue by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension. The proposed rezoning and development, with up to 50 single family lots and a senior living facility with 120 units, does not comply with the the NE District Plan and the Comprehensive Plan set forth by the City of Iowa City. The original plans specified development of a short cul -de -sac -no longer than 900 feet, and were developed to minimize the impact of on Hickory Hills Park. If this space is to be developed, these original plans must be followed. Our Hickory Hills Park is a unique urban park that should be protected. A larger buffer is necessary to diminish city noise within the park and elimination of the buffer zone to the proposed 35-48 feet (in some areas) will have a direct impact on wildlife that travel between the park and surrounding areas. Additionally, my property is immediately adjacent to the site to be developed and this extensive increase in housing density will dramatically increase noise and traffic in the area, with a negative impact on both Hickory Hills Park and traffic on Scott Boulevard. Sincerely, Mark Renshaw 72 Hickory Heights Lane Iowa City, Iowa This email is from an external source. From: Elizabeth Tracey To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Development by Axiom Consultants bordering Hickory Hill Park Date: Friday, February 12, 2021 1:17:38 AM We are writing to convey our objection to the proposed rezoning and development of the 48.75 acres on the SW corner of Scott Blvd and N 1 st Ave by Axiom Consultants for completion of a Hickory Trail extension. The proposed development, with up to 50 single family lots and a senior living facility, does not comply with the NE District plan and the Comprehensive plan set forth by the city. The original plan specified development of a short cul-de-sac no longer than 900 feet. These original plans were put into place to minimize the impact of development on Hickory Hill Park (HHP), and should be followed. HHP is a unique urban park that should be protected. A larger buffer is necessary to diminish city noise within the park and elimination of the buffer zone to the proposed 35-48 feet (in some areas) will have a direct impact on wildlife that travel between the park and surrounding areas on a daily basis. Additionally, we live immediately adjacent to the site to be developed and this extensive increase in housing density will dramatically increase noise and traffic in the area, with a negative impact on both Hickory Hill Park and the traffic on Scott Blvd. Sincerely, Elizabeth Tracey and Robert Beck 40 Hickory Heights Lane Iowa City, Iowa 52245 This email is from an external source. From: Julie Moffitt To: Raymond Heitner Subject: Rezoning adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Friday, February 12, 20217:50:17 AM RI$H Dear Mr Heitner, I am writing regarding rezoning of land adjacent to Hickory Hill park. I have lived in Iowa City since 1999 and have run and hiked 1000's of miles in that park. I took my dog for the last cross country ski of his life in that park, I took my young daughter for her first trail run in that park, and I have run many miles with cherished friends there as well. Every time I wander the trails there, it never ceases to amaze me at the natural beauty and wildlife I see. This park is a crowing jewel in Iowa City. Rezoning this land adjacent - and I know this section well - will effective remove a buffer from that side of the park and negatively impact habitat and the experience. If Central Park in NYC can exist as it does, surely Iowa City, IA can be as thoughtful and protective of its urban parks and natural habitat. I would request that you deny this request for rezoning. There is plenty of other land to develop. Please share my comments at the rezoning meeting. Sincerely, Julia A. Moffitt, PhD 302 W Park Rd, Iowa City, IA 52246 From: Kelly Teeselink To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Comments on the proposed residential development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Friday, February 12, 20218:02:37 AM RI$H Good morning, This email is in regards to the proposed residential development adjacent to Hickory Hill Park. I was (and am) very heartbroken and frustrated to hear of this potential residential development that I believe would negatively impact the best park in Iowa City. But to take the emotion out of it, one of the biggest issues I see is this proposal does not comply with the NE District plan, nor the Comprehensive Plan. This plan calls for a "conservation residential design" and myself and others do not believe the developer's proposed design follows the City's established comprehensive plan and needs to be reworked. Furthermore, the City's Comprehensive Plan, when discussing Parks and Open Space Goals and Strategies, "discourages parks that are surrounded by private property; encourage development of parks with single loaded street access." This residential development would be doing the opposite of the comprehensive plan. On another note, I can't claim to know much about deer population and control but I am going on the assumption that the more deer habitat that is removed, the more deer will end up in residential areas. With the city spending lots of resources on deer population control, it's frustrating to see that there is a proposed plan that would destroy this animal friendly habitat. And finally, I must admit I am no longer an Iowa City resident as of one month ago. I lived in Iowa City for 16 years and consider it my home. I moved to Flagstaff, Arizona because I wanted more access to nature and wild spaces. While IC and the surrounding area provides lovely trails and parks, I wanted to live in a place that actively conserved outdoor spaces and made them more abundant and accessible. This proposed plan near HHP reaffirmed my decision to leave Iowa City, which wasn't an easy one. I know I'm not the only who places significant weight on access to and conservation of outdoor spaces when deciding where to live. Thank you for listening! Kelly Teeselink From: Carolyn L. Buckingham To: Anne Russett; Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: Proposed Development Adjacent to Hickory Hill Park Date: Friday, February 12, 20218:41:58 AM Dear Ms. Russett and Mr. Heitner, I am writing on behalf of myself and my husband, Mike Biderman, to express our opposition to the proposed development along the easternmost border of Hickory Hill Park. The proposed development does not adhere to the recommendations listed in Iowa City's Northeast District Plan for the Bluffwood Area, or the City's Comprehensive Plan and does not provide for an adequate buffer between the residential development and the park. Moreover, Hickory Hill Park is such a unique and special place in our City and a new development built directly adjacent to the Park will severely impact wildlife habitat and be detrimental to the water quality of Ralston Creek. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Carolyn Buckingham & Mike Biderman This email is from an external source. From: Jorgensen, Shea M To: Raymond Heitner Cc: Anne Russett Subject: Re: [External] RE: Proposed land development Date: Friday, February 12, 2021 11:20:40 AM Attachments: imaae001.Dna image002.pnno imaae003.Dna image004.pnno imaae005.Dna Yes, if you could forward this to City Staff that would be much appreciated. I have since heard from the Friends of Hickory Hill group and would also like to add that this development proposal does not comply with the NE District plan, nor the Comprehensive Plan. Thank you for listening to the families and individuals of our city who care about our natural spaces. Shea Jorgensen, MD From: Raymond Heitner <Raymond-Heitner@iowa-city.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 20219:09 AM To: Jorgensen, Shea M Cc: Anne Russett Subject: [External] RE: Proposed land development Shea, Thank you for your comments. Attached is a letter that we sent out to nearby residents last week. The letter contains information on how to access the upcoming Planning and Zoning Commission meeting where we intend to discuss the rezoning application for this property. Please let me know if you would like City staff to forward any correspondence to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank you, Ray He tner AICP Associate Planner (he/him/his) 319.356.5238 ravmond-heitner(@iowa-citv.ore 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 ®IIIA CITY A U R E S C O C F F Y OF LITERATURE WWW.ICGOV.ORG 0 00 From: Jorgensen, Shea M <shea-Jorgensen(@uiowa.edu> Sent: Saturday, February 6, 20211:34 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett(@iowa-city.org>, ray-heitner(@iowa-city.org Subject: Proposed land development Dear Ms. Russett and Mr. Heitner, My family lives in Iowa City and we frequent Hickory Hills, as well as other natural areas in town, at least weekly with our 2 -year-old. One of our favorite aspects of Iowa City is the nature built into the city, especially places we can easily walk to, like Hickory Hills. I am very concerned about the encroachment of the residential development proposal adjacent to Hickory Hills. I don't believe the developer's proposed design is an adequate buffer and it would be a shame to lose another of the few natural places remaining in the city. I hope that we can protect what is left of our wild areas for future generations. Once they are developed, they will never be reclaimed. On behalf of my 2 -year-old and all the kids who benefit from natural places in the city, thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Shea Jorgensen, MD Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you. From: Weis, Adam J To: Anne Russett Cc: Raymond Heitner Subject: Re: [External] RE: Hickory Hill Park/NE District Date: Friday, February 12, 20212:43:34 PM I Hi Anne, Thank you for replying and forwarding my message on. It is nice to know that our voices are heard, and I value your time. The 10 -acre addition is a small consolation in what is a betrayal of the NE District Plan, of Iowa City, and of nature. Please forward my comments to P&Z. I know Iowa City will make the right decision in the end. Thanks again, Adam From: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 202110:41 AM To: Weis, Adam J <adam-j-weis@uiowa.edu> Cc: Ray Heitner <raymond-heitner@iowa-city.org> Subject: [External] RE: Hickory Hill Park/NE District Hi, Adam — Thank you for your email. We will forward it to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration. I did want to let you know that with the proposal the park would be expanded by 10 acres. Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks, Anne From: Weis, Adam J <adam-j-weis@uiowa.edu> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 20219:39 AM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Hickory Hill Park/NE District t�l�ki Dear Ms. Russett, I'm writing to express my concern about development plans near Hickory Hill Park. I'm a graduate student at the University and have lived in Iowa City since I was four years old. In my twenty years here, I've explored nearly every corner of our city, particularly its natural areas. I'm really proud that the IC area has so many beautiful parks and trail systems, and I think it's one of the strongest aspects of our community. I've spent hundreds of hours with friends and acquaintances running and hiking in our parks, especially Hickory Hill. When I heard about plans to develop northeast of the park, it immediately struck me as poor planning. In a time when Iowa City is trying to embrace sustainability and the fight against climate change (for instance, the prairie plantings in the parks which I think is absolutely amazing), it seems antithetical and backwards to develop along park boundaries. If anything, Hickory Hill should be expanded, so that more land area can be restored to native landscape which helps reduce flooding through increased infiltration, clean our water and air, provide habitat for wildlife, and offer more recreational opportunities for our neighbors. It's especially imperative that existing natural areas are bolstered since it's much easier to expand an existing park than create a new one. And wildlife corridors become more effective with size and inter- connection, rather than being dispersed across the city. I'm also concerned that the developers will not follow the NE District Plan and maintain a proper buffer or follow "conservation design." Due to its proximity to Ralston Creek, developing any additional land in this part of town cannot embrace conservation. The increase in impermeable surfaces will only increase the flashiness of Ralston Creek, and additional contaminants will runoff into the stream. Iowa City should be seeking every single opportunity it can to strengthen the size and health of its natural areas. We're lucky to have a community that cares about nature and recreation and prioritizes those aspects in a state which does not. Please at least consider these things, and I appreciate you spending the time to read this. I would be happy to help in any way I can. I love Iowa City and would hate to see it become a haven for developers seeking short-term gains. Thank you, Adam Weis Graduate Research Assistant Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Iowa From: darcy128Cabaol.com To: Raymond Heitner; Anne Russett Cc: darcy128Cabaol.com Subject: REZ20-0016 Hickory Trail Estates Date: Friday, February 12, 20213:21:26 PM I RI$H Dear Mr. Heitner and Ms. Russett, I'm writing to you with regard to the rezoning of the land proposed as Hickory Trail Estates REZ20-0016 In the rezoning exhibit submitted by Mr. Clark, lots numbered 26-44 clearly ignore the "buffer zone" that the overall city plans for development near parks contain. This proposal does not comply with the NE District Plan nor the Comprehensive Plan for development. Why did the city go to the trouble of developing these plans if not to follow them? Lots numbered 26 through 44 are clearly encroaching on the area designed to protect the park. Those additional nineteen lots are far too close to the park. People within the park will be subjected to so much more noise from people not to mention car traffic. This road could easily become a cut through for people coming from Scott Boulevard. The plan clearly shows that one remedy for the congestion was contemplated and that is the use of a cul-de-sac. Why was that abandoned? Additionally, removal of lots 26-44 would create a single -loaded street, both of which are to be used in city development close to parks. This development is already going to severely impinge upon the enjoyment of the park. This park is a City of Iowa City treasure and should be kept that way. I have been a user of this park for at least fifty of my sixty -plus years and I have seen the many changes that have come, some of them very good but this one, as proposed, will be among the worst. I am a wheelchair user now and we often go to the end of Hickory Trail on a nightly walk. The beautiful prairie grasses and abundant animal life is a joy. Make no mistake. First Avenue traffic behind us is still plenty loud but if this were a street with houses on two sides, the north side of the park will never be the same. Please do the right thing and minimize this development by keeping within the NE District Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, already in place. Please forward this comment to the Planning and Zoning commission. Darcy Lipsius 2639 Hickory Trail From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: Hickory Hill Park Proposed Development Plan Date: Friday, February 12, 20213:32:19 PM From: Emily Kim <emilyakim05@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 12, 20213:32 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Hickory Hill Park Proposed Development Plan fi i Hello Anne, My name is Emily Kim and I have thoroughly enjoyed many hikes through Hickory Hill Park over the years. I also am a teacher in Iowa City, and many of my students enjoy the park - especially the sledding! They tell me, "it's one of the best sledding hills in IC." I don't have any kids yet (I am actually due with our first baby in a few days), but I imagine we'll be frequenting HHP for many sled trips in the future, per the recommendation of MANY Iowa City fourth graders. After seeing the newest proposed development plan, I am concerned because the plan does not comply with the NE District Plan or Comprehensive Plan. These plans were put in place to minimize the impact on Hickory Hill Park. They should be followed with integrity and fidelity. I know Iowa City prides itself on its commitment to nature, to sustainability, and to providing the best park areas for its residents. Hickory Hill Park is a crucial part of the city and we ask that any negative impact on the park be avoided at all costs. Thank you for your time and commitment to Iowa City! Emily Kim From: Anne Russett To: Raymond Heitner Subject: FW: Concerns about proposed development near Hickory Hill Park Date: Friday, February 12, 20213:31:09 PM From: Molitor, Hannah R <hannah-molitor@uiowa.edu> Sent: Friday, February 12, 20213:18 PM To: Anne Russett <Anne-Russett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Concerns about proposed development near Hickory Hill Park fi RI$ki Hello Ms. Russett, As a resident and taxpayer in Iowa City for 5 years now, and someone who appreciates natural spaces in Iowa City, I'm writing to you to express my concerns for the proposed development near Hickory Hill Park. As I'm sure you know, the proposed plan does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan nor does it comply with the Northeast District Plan. I'm asking that the proposed development not be pursued, and that the city adhere to its previous agreements to better protect Hickory Hill Park. While I realize that all development will not be stopped, I advocate for responsible planning around the park and establishing a buffer zone. Please forward my thoughts to the planning and zoning committee. All the best, Hannah Molitor Hannah Molitor Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Iowa hannah-molitor&uiowa. edu Item Number: 8.b. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution setting public hearing for June 1, 2021, on a proposal to convey a single-family home located at 520 N. Dodge Street. Prepared By: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The assessed value of 520 N. Dodge at the time of purchase was $139,930. The sales price will be $227,000. There will be no impact on the general fund for ongoing operational expenses. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Before & After Photos Resolution Executive Summary: On May 18, 2021, City Council will set a public hearing for June 1, 2021 to consider a resolution authorizing the conveyance of 520 N. Dodge as part of the UniverCity Neighborhood Partnership Program. This will be the 69th property sold under the program. Background /Analysis: Through the UniverCity Neighborhood Partnership Program, the City proposes to sell 520 N. Dodge Street for $227,000. The City purchased the home for $167,500. City funds were used to rehabilitate the home to sell to an eligible buyer. Unlike other UniverCity residential properties that were sold as single family homes, 520 N. Dodge was purchased as a side-by-side duplex and renovated as upper and lower units with a one -bedroom unit on the main floor and a studio unit with a separate entrance on the second floor. The City will require that the buyer keep the property as owner -occupied but would have the option to live in one unit and rent out the other if they choose. The property is located in a neighborhood commercial zone which also allows the opportunity for a ground -floor business. Based on these requirements, the City had difficulty selling the property through our normal channels. The City hired a realtor to take advantage of their expertise and the Multiple Listing Service to market the home to a broader audience. In addition to the reconfiguration of the units, renovations included siding repair, exterior paint, new windows, foundation repair, spray foam insulation, and HVAC upgrades. The interiors were completely renovated with updated kitchens and bathrooms, laundry, new flooring, drywall, and paint in each unit. The property has a total of 1,477 square feet of finished living space and is located directly across the street from Mann Elementary. The home is located in an area where there is a mix of owner - occupied and rental units, as well as commercial properties. The renovated home will be an asset to the neighborhood and community. ATTACHMENTS: Description Before and After Photos resolution � r � CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE 520 N. Dodge - Before Renovations Before Renovations - Lower Level: � r � CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE Before Renovations - Upper Level: 520 N. Dodge - During Renovations: 520 N. Dodge — After Renovations Professional photos & staging by Julie Dancer, Lepic-Kroeger Realtors After Renovations - Lower Level: l � � aP��1L Ilk CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE � r � CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE ---w After Renovations - Upper Level: il �e Prepared by: Susan Dulek, Assistant City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)356-5030 RESOLUTION NO. 21-137 Resolution setting public hearing for June 1, 2021, on a proposal to convey a single-family home located at 520 N. Dodge Street. Whereas, the UniverCity Neighborhood Partnership Program is a project to encourage home ownership and reinvestment in designated neighborhoods surrounding the University of Iowa; and Whereas, the City purchases rental units located in designated neighborhoods surrounding the University of Iowa, rehabilitates them, and then sells them to income -eligible buyers; and Whereas, the City purchased and rehabilitated a single-family home located at 520 N. Dodge Street, Iowa City; and Whereas, the City has received an offer to purchase 520 N. Dodge Street for the principal sum of $227,000; and Whereas, this sale is conditioned on the family securing adequate financing for the purchase of the home. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council does hereby declare its intent to convey the home located at 520 N. Dodge Street, Iowa City, Iowa, for the sum of $227,000. 2. A public hearing on said proposal should be and is hereby set for June 1, 2021, at 6:00 p.m. in Emma J. Hanrat Hall of the Iowa City City Hall, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be published as provided by law. 3. City Hall is currently closed to the public because of the coronavirus. If City Halls remains closed to the public, the meeting will be an electronic meeting using the Zoom Meetings Platform. For information on how to participate in the electronic meeting, see www.icgov.org/Gouncildocs or telephone the City Clerk at 319/356-5043. I � �Q 1� MA OR ATTEST: CITY CLERK oved by City Attorney's O ice — 05/12/2021 Resolution No. .21 137 Page 2 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Bergus x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner Passed and approved this 18th day of May 2021. Item Number: 8.c. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution setting a public hearing on June 1, 2021 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Curb Ramp 2021 Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Jason Reichart, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost for this project is $165,000. Funds are available in the Curb Ramp -ADA account #S3822. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This is a recurring project that installs and repairs sidewalks and curb ramps throughout the City to improve accessibility and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The focus of the project is to install curb ramps in locations that do not have curb ramps and to improve locations to meet current ADA requirements. Background /Analysis: The Curb Ramp 2021 Project includes work at the following intersections: Foster Road and Swisher Street Foster Road and Canton Street Foster Road and Ball Street Oberlin Street and Lower West Branch Road Riverside Drive and Benton Street Shamrock Drive and Peterson Street Arbor Drive and Shamrock Drive Arbor Drive and Beech Street Arbor Drive and Arbor Circle Project Timeline: Set Public Hearing — May 18, 2021 Hold Public Hearing /Approve Plans and Specifications — June 1, 2021 Bid Letting — June 30, 2021 Award Date — July 6, 2021 Construction Start — Summer 2021 Final Completion — Fall 2021 ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution N Prepared by Jason Reichert, Engineering Division, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240,(319)356-5416 Resolution No. 21-138 Resolution setting a public hearing on June 1, 2021 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Curb Ramp 2021 Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Curb Ramps -ADA account # S3822. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-mentioned project is to be held on the 1st day of June 2021, at 6:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. City Hall is currently closed to the public because of the coronavirus. If City Hall remains closed to the public, the meeting will be an electronic meeting using the Zoom Meetings Platform. For information on how to participate in the electronic meeting, see www.icgov.org/councildocs or telephone the City Clerk at 319/356-5043. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 4. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this 18th day of Ma Attest: City Clerk 2021 I � MaKr Approv City Attorney's Ice — 5/13/2021 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by 'Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: x Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 8.d. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution setting a public hearing on June 1, 2021 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Public Housing Pavement Repair Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Marri VanDyke, Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $147,000 available in the Public Housing Capital Funds, accounts #79490332 and #79490334 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This item begins the bidding process for the Public Housing Pavement Repair Project, which includes sidewalk and driveway repairs at 34 City -owned public housing units located throughout Iowa City. Background /Analysis: The Housing Authority is a division of the City of Iowa City established in 1969 to administer housing assistance programs throughout its jurisdiction, including all of Johnson County and portions of Iowa and Washington Counties. The Housing Authority currently assist more than 1,300 low-income families to acquire and maintain affordable housing through rental and ownership programs. Multiple City -owned public housing units in Iowa City need sidewalk and driveway repairs to eliminate tripping hazards and comply with City code. Project Timeline: Set Public Hearing — May 18, 2021 Hold Public Hearing — June 1, 2021 Bid Letting — June 23, 2021 Award Date — July 6, 2021 Construction — July 2021 —October 2021 ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Marri VanDyke, Engineering Division, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240,(319)356-5044 Resolution No. 21-139 Resolution setting a public hearing on June 1, 2021 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Public Housing Pavement Repair Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Public Housing Capital Funds. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-mentioned project is to be held on the 1" day of June, 2021, at 6:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. City Hall is currently closed to the public because of the coronavirus. If City Hall remains closed to the public, the meeting will be an electronic meeting using the Zoom Meetings Platform. For information on how to participate in the electronic meeting, see www.icgov.org/councildocs or telephone the City Clerk at 319/356-5043. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above-named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 4. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above-named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this 18th day of May _'2021 MayaV Attest: City Jerk City Attorney's Office — 05/13/2021 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 11. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution amending the current budget for the fiscal year ending June 2021. Prepared By: Jacklyn Fleagle, Budget & Compliance Officer Reviewed By: Dennis Bockenstedt, Finance Director Ashley Monroe, Assistant City Manager Fiscal Impact: FY2021 budget revisions funded through new revenues or available fund balance Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: FY2021 List of Budget Amendments #3 Resolution Executive Summary: The Finance Department requests the City Council conduct a public hearing for consideration of amending the fiscal year 2021 annual budget on May 18, 2021. This is the third budget amendment for fiscal year 2021. Background /Analysis: Budget amendments are submitted to the Finance Department and reviewed for approval by the Finance Director and City Manager. Requests to carry appropriations over from one year to the next are also submitted and approved in the same manner. A formal recommendation for a budget amendment is then prepared for City Council approval. The State of Iowa allows cities to amend the annual operating budget for supplemental appropriation authority. These changes may include new or revised revenue and expenditure projections, transfers between funds, and capital improvement plan changes. I ncreased expenditures must utilize available fund balance or additional revenue sources, as the State does not allow amendments to increase property taxes. According to the City's financial policies, amendments to operating budgets will be made only in the following situations: • emergency situations • transfer from contingency • expenditures with offsetting revenues or fund balance • carry-over of prior year budget authority for expenses that had not been paid as of the end of the fiscal year. This proposed budget amendment increases overall revenues and transfers -in by $1,779,217, as shown on Line 15 of the attached notice (see Revenues & Other Financing Sources, lines 1-15). The majority of the increase of revenues being amended is for intergovernmental revenues and transfers in. Intergovernmental revenues (line 9) are being increased by $1,354,217 which primarily represents grant revenues in response to the COVI D-19 pandemic and the Derecho Storm. Additionally, Transfers in (line 14) are being amended up by $425,000 for the transfers of funds to be used for fire station land purchase. The section entitled Expenditures & Other Financial Uses (lines 16-28) provides for an increase in appropriations of $1,884,121. The majority of the increase in appropriations is related to governmental capital improvement projects that total $993,000 due to the purchase of land for two fire station locations. The next largest increase in appropriations is for the Transfers out (line 27), also for the purchase of land for the fire station locations. This amendment also includes new expenditure amounts in response to the continuation of the COVI D-19 pandemic and the Derecho Storm in the Fall of 2020, as well as a new Police policy software, a pool pump repair, and consulting services for officer recruitment and protest review. The net budgeted result to fund balances is a reduction of $104,904 (line 29). This reduction will be covered through excess fund balances and bond funds and will not affect property tax revenues or levies. The City Budget Amendment and Certification Resolution for the third budget amendment of fiscal year 2021 is attached to this memo along with a detailed list of the individual amendments. ATTACHMENTS: Description FY2021 List of Budget Amendments #3 Resolution Fiscal Year 2021 Budget Amendment #3 Org Obiect Proiect Description Amount Program Line 10310712 471010 Purchase 931 6th Ave $ 65,000.00 21 10310712 473010 Demo 931 6th Ave $ 25,000.00 21 10450900 490040 Fire Station #3 land purchase $ 425,000.00 27 31450900 471010 Fire Station #5 land purchase $ 525,000.00 23 31450900 471010 Fire Station #3 land purchase $ 425,000.00 23 31450900 393140 Fire Station #3 land purchase $ (425,000.00) 14 10310722 469190 906 COVID-19 $ 5,979.62 16 10310722 469210 906 COVID-19 $ 12,575.00 16 25490190 331200 906 COVID-19 $ (8,100.00) 9 83310510 476050 906 COVID-19 $ 18,280.95 x 10530200 331200 907 Derecho $ (8,500.00) 9 10530200 473010 907 Derecho -City Park shelter $ 10,000.00 19 10530210 331200 907 Derecho $ (8,500.00) 9 10530210 474420 907 Derecho - fences damaged $ 10,000.00 19 10530300 331200 907 Derecho $ (127,500.00) 9 10530300 473020 907 Derecho - debris removal $ 50,000.00 17 10530300 445020 907 Derecho - tree removal $ 100,000.00 17 10540100 331200 907 Derecho $ (5,132.00) 9 10540100 445020 907 Derecho $ 6,037.50 19 22710322 331200 907 Derecho $ (34,278.00) 9 22710322 414100 907 Derecho $ 8,076.71 17 22710332 414100 907 Derecho $ 25,715.96 17 22710332 474420 907 Derecho $ 6,534.48 17 22710323 331200 907 Derecho $ (25,500.00) 9 22710323 469040 907 derecho - street signs $ 30,000.00 17 32710910 331200 907 Derecho $ (36,550.00) 9 32710910 473010 907 Derecho - light poles $ 13,000.00 23 32710910 473010 907 derecho - traffic signals $ 30,000.00 23 73730120 331200 907 Derecho - water building $ (42,500.00) 9 73730120 473010 907 Derecho - water building $ 50,000.00 25 73730120 331200 907 Derecho $ (31,870.75) 9 73730120 445230 907 Derecho $ 37,495.00 25 74740110 331200 907 Derecho - building $ (12,750.00) 9 74740110 473010 907 Derecho - building $ 15,000.00 25 75750121 331200 907 Derecho $ (11,645.00) 9 75750121 474420 907 Derecho $ 13,700.00 25 75750122 331200 907 Derecho $ (8,505.00) 9 75750122 414100 907 Derecho $ 10,005.91 25 81710510 331200 907 Derecho $ (11,892.35) X 81710510 467160 907 Derecho $ 13,991.00 X 71810210 331100 906 CRSSA Transit Funding $ (969,886.00) 9 76850110 331100 CRSSA Airport Funding $ (23,000.00) 9 10410100 432080 Space Needs study $ (50,000.00) 16 10410100 476130 Policy software $ 68,000.00 10410100 432080 Officer recruitment plan $ 10,000.00 10310710 479999 Police software/recruitment plan $ (28,000.00) 10310710 479999 Pool pump repair $ (5,000.00) 10520543 472010 Pool pump repair $ 5,000.00 10310710 479999 OIR Group - protest review $ (25,000.00) 10210100 432060 OIR Group - protest review $ 25,000.00 10510100 432080 Moved park swing to FY22 & bought from CIP $ (15,000.00) 83310510 476050 Server Storage $ 256,899.00 X State Form Program Lines Use of Money & Property - 8 Intergovernmental (1,354,216.75) 9 Charges for Services - 10 Miscellaneous - 12 Other Financing Sources - 13 Transfers In (425,000.00) 14 Public Safety 46,554.62 16 Public Works 220,327.15 17 Health & Social Services - 18 Culture & Recreation 16,037.50 19 Community & Economic Development - 20 General Government 57,000.00 21 Debt Service - 22 Capital Projects 993,000.00 23 Business-Type/Enterprise 126,200.91 25 Transfers Out 425,000.00 27 Internal Service (not budgeted) 277,278.60 X 382,182.03 Internal Service (not budgeted) (277,278.60) Excess Revenues & Other Financing Sources under Expenditures/Transfers Out 104,903.43 29 16 16 21 21 19 21 21 19 52a -w483 11 CITY BUDGET AMENDMENT AND CERTIFICATION RESOLUTION - FY 2021 - AMENDMENT #3 To the Auditor of JOHNSON County, Iowa: The City Council of Iowa City in said County/Counties met on 5/1812021 ,at the place and hour set in the notice, a copy of which accompanies this certificate and is certified as to publication. Upon taking up the proposed amendment, it was considered and taxpayers were heard for and against FILED the amendment. JOHNSON CO. IOWA The Council, after hearing all taxpayers wishing to be heard and considering the statements made by them, gave MAY 2 12021 final consideration to the proposed amendment(s) to the budget and modifications proposed at the hearing, if any. thereupon, the following resolution was introduced. �'Z/x RESOLUTION No. 21-140 .. / A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CURRENT BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 2021 COUNTY AUDH (AS AMENDED LAST ON 3/16/2021) Be it Resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City Section 1. Following notice published 5/7/2021 and the public hearing held, 5/18/2021 the current budget (as previously amended) is amended as set out herein and in the detail by fund type and activity that supports this resolution which was considered at that hearing: Revenues & Other Financing Sources Taxes Levied on Property Total Budget as certified or last amended 65,849,13 Current Amendment Total Budget after Current Amendment 65,849,13 Less: Uncollected Property Taxes -Levy Year Net Current Property Taxes 65,849,13 65,849,13 Delinquent Property Taxes TIF Revenues 2,593,20 2,593,20 Other City Taxes 2,307,29 2,307,29 Licenses& Permits 1,991,49 1,991,49 Use of Money end Property 2,272,47 2,272,471 Intergovernmental 48,351,54 1,354,21 49,705,76 Charges for Services 1 44,636,13 44,636,13 Special Assessments 11 57 57 Miscellaneous 1 2,534,661 2,534,661 Other Financing Sources 1 12,212,84 12,212 8 Transfers In 1 49,350,22 425,00 49,775,22 Total Revenues and Other sources Expenditures & Other Financing Uses Public Safety 1 1 232,099,57 28,000,471 1,779,21 46,55 233,878,79 28,047,02 Public Works 1 11,609,08 ,32 220 11,829,40 Health and Social Services 1 605,00 605,00 Culture and Recreation 1 16,400,99 16,03 16,417,03 Community and Economic Development 2 10,090,56 10,090,56 General Government 21 12,921,55 57,00 12,97 ,55 Debt Service 2 14,519,81 14,519,81 Capital Projects =+^:' 2 53,755,11 993,00 54,748,11 Total Govern Activities Expenditures 2 147,902,60 1,332,92 149,235,5271 Business Typ , .lioterpisea 73, 03, 126, Ot 73,729,3 Total Gov Activities & Business Expenditures 2 221,505,78 1,459,121 222,964,90 Transfers Out' 249,350,22 425,0 49,775.2 Total ExpenifitibresfTransfers Out 2 270,856,00 1,884,121 272,740,13 Excess Revenues & Other Sources Over (under) ExpenditureslTransfers Out Fiscal Year Beginning Fund Balance July 1 2 3 -38,756,43 180,441,531 -104,90 -38,861,34 180,. #1;531 L umuy Fund oa,anca aune au 411 141,6bb,uut] -104,9041 141,580, 19-11 Passed thiq 18th day of May, 2021 to' (Mwu+✓r vd —` -�� Sign re Signature City Cl nce Officer Mayor Resolution No. Page 2 21-144 It was moved by Salih and seconded by Weiner Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Gl`��s'il x NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner the Item Number: 12. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the 2021 Water Pavement Patching Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Prepared By: Marri VanDyke, Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $132,000 available in the Water Divisions Operating Budget, account #73730130 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This project includes pavement repairs associated with water main breaks on various streets throughout Iowa City. Types of pavement that need repaired include Portland Cement Concrete (PCC), PCC with Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) overlay, and full depth HMA. Some locations will also require the removal and replacement of driveway, sidewalk, and/or curb and gutter. Background /Analysis: Each year there are, on average, approximately 60 water main breaks within the City, and street and/or sidewalk pavement typically needs to be removed and replaced in order to repair the water main. With limited resources and the emergency nature of the pavement repairs, the City is combining the pavement repairs at multiple main break sites into a single project to more efficiently address pavement damage resulting from water main breaks. As additional main breaks occur later this year, those sites will also be added to this project for repair. Project Timeline: Hold Public Hearing — May 18, 2021 Bid Letting — June 8, 2021 Award Date — June 15, 2021 Construction — June 2021 to November 2021 ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution is Prepared by: Marri VanDyke, Engineering Division, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319) 356-5044 Resolution No. 21-141 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the 2021 Water Pavement Patching Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Whereas, notice of public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the above- named project was published as required by law, and the hearing thereon held; and Whereas, the City Engineer or designee intends to post notice of the project on the website owned and maintained by the City of Iowa City; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Water Divisions Operating Budget, account # 73730130-473010. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that 1. The project manual and estimate of cost for the above-named project are hereby approved. 2. The amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construction of the above- named project shall be in the amount of 10% (ten percent) of bid payable to Treasurer, City of Iowa City, Iowa. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post notice as required in Section 26.3, not less than 13 days and not more than 45 days before the date of the bid letting, which may be satisfied by timely posting notice on the Construction Update Network, operated by the Master Builder of Iowa, and the Iowa League of Cities website. 4. Sealed bids for the above-named project are to be received by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, at the Office of the City Clerk, at the City Hall, before 3:00 p.m. on the 8th day of June, 2021. At that time, the bids will be opened by the City Engineer or his designee, and thereupon referred to the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for action upon said bids at its next regular meeting, to be held at the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, at 6:00 p.m. on the 15th day of June, 2021, or at a special meeting called for that purpose. If City Hall is closed to the public due to the health and safety concerns from COVID-19, sealed bids may still be delivered in person on Mondays through Fridays 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. The person delivering the sealed bid may come to the front lobby of City Hall, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, Iowa, and upon arrival telephone the City Clerk at 319/356-5043. 5. City Hall is currently closed to the public because of the COVID-19. If City Hall remains closed to the public, the meeting will be an electronic meeting using the Zoom Meetings Platform. For information on how to participate in the electronic meeting, see www. Icgov.org/councildocs or telephone the City Clerk. Resolution No. 71 -141 Page 2 Passed and approved this 18th day of MaY , 2021. Ma rayed b Attest: V City Clerk City Attorney's Office — 05/06/2021 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by trims the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 15. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT May 18, 2021 Resolution approving a purchase agreement for 8 duplex properties for the South District Home Investment Partnership Program. Prepared By: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Fiscal Impact: Acquisition costs of $1,520,000 will be funded by TI F fee -in -lieu dollars to be repaid as units are eventually sold for home ownership. Ongoing maintenance costs for occupied properties are expected to be paid through rental income. As units become vacant, up to $60,000 will be invested per unit, consisting of $35,000 in local funds and $25,000 in federal HOME funds for rehabilitation, down payment assistance and any associated costs. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Location Map Resolution Executive Summary: On May 18, 2021, City Council will consider a resolution authorizing the acquisition of eight duplex properties at 1911/1913 Taylor Dr., 2003/2005 Taylor Dr., 2318/2320 Taylor Dr., 2160/2162 Davis St., 2218/2220 Davis St., 1132/1134 Sandusky Dr., 1311/1313 Sandusky Dr., and 1312/1314 Sandusky Dr. as part of the South District Home Investment Partnership Program. The City will be the landlord for the occupied units. As tenants voluntarily vacate the properties, the City will rehabilitate the homes, convert them to 2 -unit condominiums, and sell them to income -eligible homebuyers. Background /Analysis: The City proposes to purchase eight duplex units for $1,520,000 ($95,000 per unit) under the South District Home Investment Partnership Program. The properties are currently owned by a single entity. The City has previously purchased three duplex properties in the neighborhood as part of the program. To -date, three units have been renovated, and sold to neighborhood residents, one unit is available for sale, and two units are under construction. The long-term goal of the acquisition is to provide affordable owner -occupied homes in the South District Neighborhood. It is expected that this process will take several years to implement, and will ultimately depend on how long tenants choose to remain in their rental units. Of the 16 units proposed for acquisition, 15 are currently occupied by tenants. The City will honor the existing leases and no tenants will be involuntarily displaced. City staff and an outside maintenance company will manage the rental properties while they are occupied. If a tenant chooses to move out, the unit will not be re-leased. As units are voluntarily vacated over time, staff will proceed with rehabilitation. Once complete, units will be sold as owner -occupied homes with preference to purchase the homes given to neighborhood residents. The City will apply for additional HOME funds in the upcoming mid -year competitive allocation to provide down payment assistance for home buyers to keep the units as affordable as possible. City staff has notified tenants by mail of the proposed change of ownership and the opportunity for future home ownership through the South District Program. Staff will work with any tenants interested in pursuing homeownership through this program. The City continues to partner with Horizons for home buyer education and will look for additional partnership opportunities for increasing home ownership in the neighborhood. Staff also has an informational meeting with the South District Neighborhood Association leadership committee scheduled for May 13th to discuss the acquisition and get feedback from residents. Neighborhood Services plans to continue working with Climate Action staff to incorporate sustainable features in each unit to reduce carbon emissions and lower utility costs for the owners. Staff are also investigating opportunities to continue our partnership with the Home Builders Association Vocational Training Council to provide skill -building opportunities for students learning the trades as rehabilitation work is completed in each unit. Upon completing these homes, the City will have renovated a total of 11 duplexes, creating 22 affordable owner -occupied homes in this neighborhood. The City will invest over $770,000 in rehabilitation and $550,000 in downpayment assistance. When the City initiated this program, 11 % of the homes in this neighborhood were owner -occupied. Upon completion of this project, 22% of the homes will be owner -occupied. In our original equity analysis the City limited rental conversions to no more than 35% of the total homes on Taylor Drive and Davis Street to preserve affordable rental housing opportunities. Should funding and opportunities arise, we will need to determine if the City purchases additional homes in this neighborhood or if the program expands to other neighborhoods. ATTACHMENTS: Description Location Map resolution F CITY DF 10WA CITY ff South District -� Program Current Properties Proposed for Acquisitian Rental Owner-Occupied! Other Weth arty Park ! ! F � I D 12° a,D :+43 1 -� Fest + f fr7T Item: 15 STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: � r CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org South District Proposed Acquisition CITY COUNCIL MAY 181 2021 M CITY of IOWA CITY South District Program Current P repertle Pmpas dRrAr ulvtiaa Rental O 0..r-0.upledf Other o Wenerby Fark 0 125 L'0 No r� Proposed Acquisition 8 Duplexes— 16 Homes 1911/1913 Taylor Dr. 2003/2005 Taylor Dr. 2318/2320 Taylor Dr. 2160/2162 Davis St. 2218/2220 Davis St. 1132/1134 Sandusky Dr. 1311/1313 Sandusky Dr. 1312/1314 Sandusky Dr. Signed purchase agreement for $1,520,000 with seller for 8 duplexes (16 homes), subject to Council approval. Price per home: $95,000 Prior two duplexes City purchased: paid average of $67,500 per home. Note: 2 were in foreclosure and two of the other four were fire damaged. Process After acquisition, will continue to rent to existing tenants. 15 of the 16 units occupied. City will honor existing leases with tenants. City staff and an outside maintenance company will manage the units while occupied. AAs tenants voluntarily vacate units, staff will move to rehabilitate the unit. Once renovated will be sold to income eligible homebuyers with a preference for neighborhood residents. A 1911/1913 Taylor Drive 2318/2320 Taylor Drive 2003/2005 Taylor Drive 2160/2162 Davis Street 2218/2220 Davis Street 1132/1134 Sandusky Drive 1311/1313 Sandusky Drive Before Before IN i I .2 �t i II, �I /d Proposed Homeowner Financing City Investment ... $95,000 G�IM419RR-4iiiT:�ifi Carrying Costs (includes rehab. costs in excess of $35,000) +$35,000 +$10,000 Sales Price to Buyer $140,000 Sales Price Closing Costs Rehab. Forgivable Loan HOME Downpayment Total Amount to Finance: Estimated Monthly Payment (Mortgage, Insurance and Taxes) 30 year fixed loan $140,000 +$3,000 -$35,000 -$25,000 $83,000 $600 per month Proposed Funding Sources: • Acquisition: Tailwinds TIF Fee -in -Lieu ($1,805,648). As homes resold, funds go back in the Affordable Housing Fund for future projects. Proposed Acquisition $1,520,000. • Rehab. ($30,000-35,000 per home): possible sources include CDBG/HOME, General Fund or Affordable Housing Fund. • Downpayment (up to $25,000 per home): Annual HOME application. Will apply for $100,000 (for up to four homes) in upcoming HOME mid -year funding allocation. Will make subsequent applications as needed. Program Partnerships • 2021-2023 Taylor (3rd duplex acquired). Partnering with HBA Vocational Training Council, Kirkwood Community College and the Iowa City Community School District to support the area's industrial technology programs for local youth to consider careers in the construction industry. Students are assisting with the remodel and building the sheds for each home. • Partnership with our Climate Action Staff to incorporate sustainable measures in each unit and lower utility costs for owners. Partners for this home also include Backyard Abundance and Green Iowa AmeriCorps. • Will continue to partner with Horizons to provide homebuyer education to applicants. Mailed letter to impacted tenants on May 6, 2021 Letter notified the tenants that: • The City entered a purchase agreement for their property, subject to Council approval on May 18. If approved, purchase would be on or near July 30. • Their existing lease will continue to be honored and no tenants will be asked to leave under the new ownership. • If a tenant does wish to terminate their lease early, the City will accommodate such requests. Otherwise they can expect no change to lease with the ownership change. • If interested in homeownership, who to contact. • Contact information if they have general questions. • If Council approves the purchase, they will receive a follow-up letter on who to contact regarding leasing concerns, rent payments and maintenance requests once the City purchases the property. STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED 14 M CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org `S Prepared by: Susan Dulek, Asst. City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030 RESOLUTION NO. 21-142 Resolution approving a purchase agreement for 8 duplex properties for the South District Home Investment Partnership Program. Whereas, staff has negotiated a purchase agreement with the owner of the following eight (8) duplex properties for $1,520,000 contingent on Council approval: 1911/1913 Taylor Drive, 2003/2005 Taylor Drive, 2318/2320 Taylor Drive, 2160/2162 Davis Street, 2218/2220 Davis Street, 1132/1134 Sandusky Drive, 1311/1313 Sandusky Drive, and 1312/1314 Sandusky Drive; Whereas, the City should acquire the properties as part of the South District Home Investment Partnership Program; and Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: Upon the direction of the City Attorney, the City Manager is authorized to execute all documents necessary to purchase the following properties in accordance with the purchase agreement for rehabilitation and sale to income -eligible buyers: 1911/1913 Taylor Drive, 2003/2005 Taylor Drive, 2318/2320 Taylor Drive, 2160/2162 Davis Street, 2218/2220 Davis Street, 1132/1134 Sandusky Drive, 1311/1313 Sandusky Drive, and 1312/1314 Sandusky Drive. Passed and approved this 18th day of May _'2021. Attest: Approve& City Attorney's Office — 05/12/2021 Resolution No. Page 2 21-142 It was moved by trims and seconded by salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner