Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-10-03 Ordinancer t 4:livegreia-T .,,1 -"NAME. -- CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org October 3, 2022 Item Number: 9.a. Ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 27.68 acres of property located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Rd from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) Zone to Low Density Multi -Family Zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12). (REZ22-0001). (Pass & Adopt) ATTACHMENTS: Description P&Z Staff Report Late Correspondence P&Z Preliminary Meeting Minutes Council correspondence Protest of Rezoning Forms Ordinance & CZA To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ22-0001 & SUB22-0001 Cardinal Heights GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Contact Person: STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Esther Tetteh, Associate Planner Date: August 3, 2022 Jason Walton Navigate Homes jason@naviqatehomesiowa.com Brian Vogel Hall & Hall Engineers, Inc 1860 Boyson Road Hiawatha, IA 52233 319-362-9548 brian@halleng.com Owner: Jason Walton IC Grove East, LLC Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Size: Rezoning from interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Low Density Multi -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) and approval of a preliminary plat To create Cardinal Heights and allow for the development of 78 dwelling units East of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and West of Camp Cardinal Road. 27.68 acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Undeveloped, zoned for Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District: Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 2 North: OPD/RS-8 - Medium Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay South: OPD/CC-2 - Community Commercial with a Planned Development Overlay East: OPD/RS-5 - Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay and ID -RS - Interim Development Single - Family Residential West: OPD/RM-12 - Low Density Multi -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay 8-16 units / acre None NW1 Property owners in the surrounding areas have been notified of the proposed subdivision and rezoning and received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. A rezoning and a subdivision sign were posted on the site on Camp Cardinal Boulevard. April 19, 2022 45 Day Limitation Period: The applicant has waived the 45 -day review period. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Navigate Homes, is requesting approval for the rezoning of 27.68 acres from Interim Development—Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Low Density Multi -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) and a preliminary plat for land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Road. The Preliminary Plat, Planned Development Overlay, and Sensitive Areas Development Plan is provided in Attachment 3. The proposed development would allow for the development of 22 duplexes, 4 townhomes and 30 multi -family units. For renderings of the multi -family building see Attachment 4. The development proposes the extension of Deer Creek Road off Camp Cardinal Blvd through the parcel connecting to Camp Cardinal Road. The proposed preliminary plat for the development is a cul-de-sac - loop layout running north and south, lined by 22 duplexes. Following Deer Creek Road east toward Camp Cardinal Road, the proposal includes a 30 -unit multi -family complex (13 two bedroom, 17 one -bedroom units) and 4 townhomes with additional duplexes on the south side of Deer Creek. The site contains regulated sensitive features including wetlands, woodlands, and slopes. The Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan proposes impacts to wetlands and modifications to the 100' wetland buffer requirement (14-51-6), which requires a Level 11 Sensitive Areas Review. A Level 11 Sensitive Areas Review requires submission of a Sensitive Areas Development Plan 3 (SADP). Furthermore, a Level II sensitive areas review is considered a type of planned development and as such, must comply with the applicable approval criteria set forth in chapter 3, article A, "Planned Development Overlay Zone (OPD)". Good Neighbor Policy: The surrounding property owners have been notified of the proposed rezoning and preliminary plat. A virtual Good Neighbor meeting was scheduled and took place on February 1, 2022. A summary of the meeting is included in Attachment 5. ANALYSIS: Current zoning: The area is zoned as Interim Development—Research Park (ID -RP). This zone is intended for areas of managed growth in which agricultural and other nonurban uses of land may continue until the city is able to provide services and urban development can occur. The interim development zone is the default zoning district to which all undeveloped areas should be classified until city services are provided. Upon provision of city services, the City or the property owner may initiate rezoning to zones consistent with the comprehensive plan, as amended. Proposed zoning: The applicant is requesting to rezone the entire area (27.68 acres) to Low Density Multi -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12). The purpose of the Low - Density Multi -Family Residential Zone (RM -12) is to provide for the development of high density, single-family housing and low density, multi -family housing. In this case, a mix of multi -family housing units and duplex units provides a diverse variety of housing throughout the neighborhood, as intended by RM -12 zoning. Because of this mixture, attention to site and building design is important in this zone to ensure that these housing types are compatible with one another. Due to impacts to the sensitive areas, a Planned Development Overlay is required. The OPD process allows for a mixture of uses, provided that additional criteria in section 14-3A-4 and 14-3A-5 of the City Code are met. General Planned Development Approval Criteria: Applications for Planned Development Rezonings are reviewed for compliance with the following standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Zoning Ordinance. 1. The density and design of the Planned Development will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of land use, building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout. Density: The applicant is requesting a rezoning to an OPD/RM-12 zone, which allows for a density of 15 dwelling units per net acre of land area (total land minus public and private streets right-of- way). The proposed 30 -unit complex, 4 townhomes, and 22 duplexes adds up to 78 total units across the 25.02 acres of net site area, which equals 3.1 dwelling units per acre. Land Uses Proposed: The applicant is proposing a mix of duplex and multi -family residential. There are currently two areas to the west zoned RM -12 and one area to the southeast. The property to the immediate west was rezoned to OPD/RM-12 in 2017 but remains undeveloped. The property to the northwest also has RM -12 zoning with townhomes constructed, as well as ongoing townhome development. Cardinal Villas Condominiums located southeast of the subject property is also zoned as OPD/RM-12 with two multi -family buildings on the property. The area to the north is zoned OPD/RS-8 and contains duplexes similar to those proposed. The addition of more duplexes and multi -family housing to the area will complement the existing, ongoing, and future development plans in the area. Mass, Scale, and General Layout: Due to the potential impacts of the sensitive areas, the development layout is more compact instead of spreading out over the property. The proposed duplexes are located on the western edge of the site off a cul-de-sac street to the north of Deer Creek Road and a loop street to the south of Deer Creek Road. Additional duplexes front Deer 4 Creek Road to the east along with the proposed 30 -unit multi -family buildings and townhomes. The multifamily and townhomes cannot exceed 35 feet in height and have a footprint of 12,000 square feet and 3,660 square feet respectively. The OPD plan shows duplex footprints with the access to garages from the front facade. 14 -3A - 4K -1c-(2) requires garages and off-street parking areas be located so that they do not dominate the streetscape. Alley or private rear lane access will be required, unless garages are recessed behind the front facade of the dwelling in a manner that allows the residential portion of the dwelling to predominate along the street. This standard will be reviewed at site plan and building permitting stage to ensure full compliance to the requirement. Open Space: The proposed development will need to comply with private open space standards, outlined in section 14 -2B -4E of the City Code. For the 30 -unit complex, the calculation comes out to be 430 square feet of private open space required (10 SF per bedroom, 43 total bedrooms in complex). The duplexes require a minimum of 300 SF per dwelling and the townhomes require minimum 150 SF of useable open space. The applicant is aware of these open space standards as they are listed on the preliminary plat. The OPD plans shows 10,000 square feet of on-site open space for the multi -family uses. Additionally, the preliminary plat includes two outlots totaling 16.76 acres that contain regulated sensitive areas that will be placed in conservation easement at final platting. Traffic Circulation: The proposed development will have access off of Camp Cardinal Blvd through an extension of Deer Creek Road. The extension of Deer Creek Road will provide access to the entire site and, until Camp Cardinal Rd and a proposed traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road are constructed, Deer Creek Road will provide temporary access to Camp Cardinal Road. This will provide a secondary access, if needed. The subdivision code 15- 3-2K authorizes the City to request an applicant to contribute 50% of the reconstruction cost of bringing the segment of the subject street that abuts the subject property to city standards. As a condition to the rezoning, owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards prior to issuance of building permit. The infrastructure also requires traffic calming devices. The contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. 2. The development will not overburden existing streets and utilities. The property can be serviced by both sanitary sewer and water. Access to the site will be provided through the extension of Deer Creek Road, which will connect to both Camp Cardinal Blvd and Camp Cardinal Road. 3. The development will not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. The nearest neighbors to the north of the subject property are separated by a woodland preservation area and a stream corridor. The nearest neighbors to the east and southeast will also remain separated due to the preservation of woodlands. The proposed development does not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. 4. The combination of land uses and building types and any variation from the underlying zoning requirements or from City street standards will be in the public interest, in harmony with purpose of this Title, and with other building regulations. The proposed development is not seeking any waivers or variations from the underlying zoning requirements. Additionally, the proposed RM -12 zone allows the proposed mix of residential land 5 uses proposed. The proposed multi -family building, duplexes, and townhomes provide a range of housing options. When factoring in both the total building area occupied (approximately 2.27 acres or 98,800 SF) and the total area occupied by R.O.W. (2.61 acres), the total lot coverage is equal to approximately 15.5%. Meaning, approximately 84.5% of the net site area will remain free of buildings, parking, and vehicular maneuvering areas. The mix of housing, the extension of Deer Creek Road, and the preservation of sensitive features are in the public interest. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The area does not have a district plan hence, the proposed development is reviewed according to the 102030 Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map of the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property as appropriate for residential development at a density of 8-16 dwelling units per acre. As previously stated, the subject property proposes around 3.1 dwelling units per net acre. This density is actually below what is envisioned in the plan; however, the site is constrained due to the sensitive features. The IC2030 Comprehensive Plan encourages urban growth through compact and connected neighborhoods. The Preliminary Plat, Planned Development Overlay, and Sensitive Areas Development Plan demonstrates a commitment to these goals by providing wide interconnected sidewalks and a variety of housing types that as noted in the Comprehensive Plan, "Ensure a mix of housing types within each neighborhood to provide options for households of all types and people of all incomes". The Comprehensive Plan is also aimed at encouraging pedestrian -oriented development and attractive and functional streetscapes that make it safe, convenient, and comfortable to walk. The applicant is showing sidewalks along both sides of Maclan Court and Dear Creek Road. The plan also shows a sidewalk along Maclan Loop and connected to the Deer Creek sidewalk on the subject property. The sidewalk along Deer Creek will connect to the existing sidewalk along Camp Cardinal Blvd. Although the comprehensive plan discourages cul-de-sacs and emphasizes stub streets for future connectivity, the proposed development is limited due to sensitive areas and existing neighborhood constraints. Specifically, due to the layout of the neighborhood to the north, which incorporates a loop street, connecting with that existing neighborhood is not possible. By proposing development on the most buildable portion of the property, and thereby preserving the natural areas of the property, the development aligns with the goals of the comprehensive plan. Subdivision Design: The proposed subdivision contains 23 residential lots and two outlots. Outlot A is noted on the preliminary plat as open space area to be maintained by the homeowner's association. Outlot B will also contain open space to be maintained by the HOA, but it will also include a storm water management area. Additionally, the preliminary plat shows a conservation easement area that will ensure the preservation of sensitive resources. The subject plat proposes the designation of 2.61 acres of public right of way though the extension of Deer Creek Road. This also includes the construction of Maclan Court and Maclan Loop from Deer Creek Road. Maclan Court is proposed as a cul-de-sac lined by 12 duplexes. Maclan Loop is a loop street lined by another 7 duplexes proposed. East of these streets and along Deer Creek Road are the proposed 4 townhomes, housing complex, and the remaining 3 duplexes. According to section 15-3-2A-4 of the City Code, cul-de-sacs should be avoided unless it can be demonstrated that existing constraints prevent the extension of the street to access existing streets within or abutting the subdivision. Due to sensitive area constraints, as well as the northern neighborhoods providing no access point due to loop street systems, there is not an outlet for through street access. Because of these constraints on the property, the applicant proposes Maclan Court ending in a cul-de-sac. Staff supports the proposed cul-de-sac design since previous iterations with a loop street resulted in greater impact on sensitive features. 6 Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject property contains regulated wetlands, woodlands, and slopes. The applicant has submitted a Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan as part of the OPD rezoning. Due to the proposed disturbance of wetlands and associated buffers, a Level 11 Sensitive Areas Review is required. Jurisdictional Wetlands — The City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 100 ft. buffer to be maintained between a regulated wetland and any development activity (14-51-6E-1). The Ordinance does allow for buffer averaging to be permitted where an increased buffer is deemed necessary or desirable to provide additional protection to one area of a wetland for aesthetic or environmental reasons. The applicant has chosen to request buffer averaging, as wetlands and wetland buffers are proposed to be impacted. As required by 14-51-6E-2, no buffer will be reduced by more than 50% and all provided buffers will be equal to or greater than what is reduced. Additionally, the applicant proposes a buffer reduction for the wetland located at the southeastern corner of the subject property. According to 14 -51 -6E -3b of the City Code, a wetland buffer may be reduced by up to 50' if the standards of the of the previously mentioned section are met, as demonstrated by a wetland specialist. A wetland specialist has determined that all standards of 14-51-6E-2 and 14 -51 -6E -3b are met. Staff finds that the proposed buffer averaging, and buffer reduction can be justified as demonstrated by a wetland specialist and will meet the requirements of the City Code. The existing wetland is comprised of approximately 0.90 acres. Approximately 14% of the existing wetlands will be disturbed or 0.059 acres to accommodate leveling of some lots and stormwater management. Per 14-51-6G, staff has required the applicant to provide mitigation for the proposed disturbance to the existing wetland. Compensatory mitigation for the impacts to a 0.015 -acre forested wetland will be provided at a ratio of 1:2. Compensatory mitigation for the southern wetland areas will be provided at a ratio of 1:1.5. The applicant has proposed to meet the City's wetland mitigation requirements by providing onsite wetland mitigation. Specifically, the applicant will provide 0.096 acres of wetland to mitigate the loss of 0.059 acres of wetlands. Woodlands — As shown in Table 2, the subject property has approximately 22.9 acres of woodlands. The preliminary SADP shows that the development proposes to disturb 9.35 acres (55.8%) of woodlands on the subject property. An additional 3.43 acres will remain unimpacted but located within the 50' woodland buffer area. The disturbed woodlands and buffer area total 12.78 acres (55.8%), leaving roughly 44.2% (10.12 acres) unimpacted which is above the 20% woodland retention allowed per the sensitive areas ordinance. Table 2 — Summary of Woodlands Existing Disturbed & Buffer Area Woodlands Preserved 22.9 acres 100% 12.78AC (55.8%) 10.12AC (44.2%) Steep, Critical, and Protected Slopes — The subject property contains critical and protected slopes. The impacts to these slopes are outlined in Table 3. Approximately 19.3% of critical slopes are proposed to be impacted, which is below the 35% of critical slopes that are allowed to be impacted per the sensitive areas ordinance. The sensitive areas ordinance only allows impacts to protected slopes if they are manmade or needed for necessary infrastructure through a Level 11 sensitive areas review. The approximately 10.3% of protected slopes that will be impacted are either manmade slopes or for the construction of the storm water basin. Table 3 — Summary of Regulated Sloaes Slopes Existing Impacted % Non -impacted (%) Critical 328,991(100%) 63,473 (19.3%) 276,327 (84.1%) Protected 55,031(100%) 5,575 (10.3%) 49,456 (89.7%) (manmade) 7 Archaeological Sites — Staff reached out to the State archaeologist and inquired about needing an archaeological study for the site. Staff was informed that a study was conducted in 2004 and there are no current concerns with the site. Neighborhood Open Space: According to section 14-5K of the City code, dedication of public open space or fee in lieu of land dedication is addressed at the time of final platting for residential subdivisions. Based on the 27.68 acres of RM -12 zoning, the developer would be required to dedicate 1.87 acres to the City or pay a fee in -lieu of land dedication. Storm Water Management: All storm water management requirements for this site are being met in the existing regional retention basin located on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd and the proposed stormwater detention basin in Outlot B. Public Works staff have reviewed and approved the preliminary storm water management plans. Additional review will occur at the time of final platting. Sanitary Sewer Service: The development is serviced by a previously approved sanitary sewer plan of improvements that was originally proposed for development on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd. The proposed sanitary sewer line is located at the north end of the subject property. Correspondence: Staff has received public correspondence (Attachment 6) from neighboring residents voicing both concern and support for the proposed development. Generally, the concerns expressed relate to traffic and impacts on property values. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of REZ22-0001, a proposal to rezone approximately 27.68 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Road from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone subject to the following condition: 1 Prior to issuance of building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. Staff also recommends approval of SUB22-0001, a preliminary plat for Cardinal Heights. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Plat, Planned Development Overlay, and Sensitive Areas Development Plan 4. Multi -Family Building Renderings 5. Good Neighbor Meeting Summary 6. Public Correspondence Approved by: • St -h%, Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles I i I i I REZ22-0001 and SUB22-0002 Cardinal Pointe Heights f � i ciugur CITY OF IOWA CITY Prepared By: Emani Brinkman Date Prepared: January 2022 • 4)'R CREEK, RD An application submitted by Hall & Hall Engineers, INC, on behalf of IC Grove East, LLC, for approval of a rezoning and subdivision of 27.68 acres located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd from Interim Development -Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Low Density Multi -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone. Jr s ._� . . AMP CARDINAL BLVD 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles I i I i I • REZ22-0001 and SUB22-0002 Cardinal Pointe Heights w I !'�:.��.®fit ..710hriado so I Air CITY OF IOWA CITY Prepared By: Emani Brinkman Date Prepared: January 2022 • An application submitted by Hall & Hall Engineers, INC, on behalf of IC Grove East, LLC, for approval of a rezoning and subdivision of 27.68 acres located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd from Interim Development -Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Low Density Multi -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone. P CARDINAL!BLVD PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR UTILITY AND EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NUMBERS CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY WATER DEPARTMENT WASTEWATER DIVISION - COLLECTIONS IOWA ONE CALL (UTILITIES) MID -AMERICAN ENERGY UTILITY LEGEND -EXISTING (SS8) (ST15) (FM6) (W8) (G) (G) (S) (S) - - - (OHE)- - - - (OHE)- - - - (E) - - - - (E) - - - - (C)- - - - (C)- - - - (OHC)- - - - (OHC)- - --(OHT)- - --(OHT)- - - - - (F) - - - - (F) - - - (OHF)- - - - (OHF)- (T)- - - -(T) // -«««««««« (FP) (FW) (CORP) 800- ® OR SANITARY SEWER W/SIZE STORM SEWER W/SIZE SUBDRAIN FORCE MAIN W/SIZE WATER MAIN W/SIZE GAS STEAM ELECTRIC -OVERHEAD ELECTRIC -UNDERGROUND CABLE TV -UNDERGROUND CABLE TV -OVERHEAD TELEPHONE -OVERHEAD FIBER OPTIC -UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC -OVERHEAD TELEPHONE -UNDERGROUND FENCE LINE SILT FENCE FLOODPLAIN LIMITS FLOODWAY LIMITS CITY CORPORATE LIMITS CONTOUR LINE LIGHT POLE W/O MAST LIGHT POLE W/MAST TELEPHONE POLE POWER POLE GUY ANCHOR GUY POLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TELEPHONE MANHOLE CABLE TV PEDESTAL UTILITY/CONTROL CABINET SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE GRATE INTAKE RA -3 INTAKE 11 011 RA -5 INTAKE RA -6 INTAKE RA -8 INTAKE �poJ HORSESHOE CATCH BASIN W/O FLUME 0 ®GV HORSESHOE CATCH BASIN W/FLUME GAS VALVE ® FLARED END SECTION CLEANOUT, STORM OR SANITARY ®--�� TRAFFIC SIGNAL W/MAST O BOLLARD *BM BENCHMARK STREET SIGN WELL 4 SB SOIL BORING FIRE HYDRANT ®wv WATER VALVE 460 WATER SHUTOFF WATER BLOWOFF NOTE: THIS IS A STANDARD LEGEND. SOME ITEMS MAY NOT APPEAR ON DRAWINGS. PLAN APPROVED BY: CITY CLERK DATE PLAN DATE: 08/01/2022 CITY FILE NUMBER: HALL AND HALL PROJECT NUMBER: 20034-20-2 (319)-356-5140 (319)-356-5275 911 (319)-356-5260 911 (319)-356-5166 (319)-631-1144 (800)-292-8989 (319)-339-1156 UTILITY LEGEND -PROPOSED CARDINAL HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA IOWA ONE -CALL 800/292-8989 TOLL-FREE CALL- BEFORE- YOU- DIG SS8 ST18 FM6 W12 CORP ® OR ffl gcl v 460 SURVEY LEGEND SANITARY SEWER W/SIZE STORM SEWER W/SIZE FORCE MAIN W/SIZE WATER MAIN W/SIZE CITY CORPORATE LIMITS SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE GRATE INTAKE RA -3 INTAKE RA -5 INTAKE RA -6 INTAKE RA -8 INTAKE HORSESHOE CATCH BASIN W/O FLUME FLARED END SECTION CLEANOUT, STORM OR SANITARY FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE WATER SHUTOFF WATER BLOWOFF O • • X () PLANT LEGEND SET REBAR W/CAP NO. FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS NOTED FOUND RIGHT OF WAY RAIL SECTION CORNER SET AS NOTED SECTION CORNER FOUND AS NOTED CUT "X" IN CONCRETE RECORDED AS EASEMENT LINE PLAT OR SURVEY BOUNDARY PLAT LOT LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE 1/4 SECTION LINE 1/4-1/4 SECTION LINE EXISTING LOT LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS SHRUB CONIFEROUS SHRUB TREE STUMP TREE LINE DRIP EDGE PLANS SCALE CORRECTLY WHEN PLOTTED ON 22"x34" PAPER HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. Leaders i/o Land Development Since /953 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com LOCATION MAP (SCALE: 1"=500') CARDINAL POINTE WEST PART 3 CARDINAL POINTE SOUTH PART 3 1.0' TYP 1/2 R.O.W. - 30' 28 B -B PROFILE LINE, E ROW, AND SURVEY BASELINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1/2 R.O.W - 30' 5.0' 10.0' 14' 14' 10.0' 5.0' (MAX.) 3.5 -11 COMPACTED FILL NOTES: SUBDRAIN (TYP) AS SHOWN ON PLANS SEE NOTE 1 -COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED - 6" MIN. SUBBASE AS SPECIFIED -7" PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH SEE NOTE 2 STORM SEWER WITH GASKETED JOINTS AS PER PLANS SEE NOTE 1 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF STORM SEWER LINES. SUBDRAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF STREET EVEN IF STORM SEWER IS PRESENT. WHERE PLANS SHOW THESE LINES UNDER PAVEMENT LONGITUDINALLY, SUBGRADE SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN TO TRENCHES FOR THESE LINES. THIS WORK IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR LINES UNDER INTERSECTION RETURNS. DEPTH OF SUBBASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. 2. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED OVER STORM SEWER AND/OR SUBDRAIN TRENCHES WHERE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN PROPER SUBBASE DRAINAGE. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED TO CENTERLINE OF STORM SEWER TRENCH AND COMPLETELY OVER SUBDRAIN TRENCH. 3. SEE SUDAS DETAIL 7030.104 FOR GRADING BEHIND CURB. 4. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE THIRD POINT JOINTING PER SUDAS DETAIL 7010.901 TYPICAL 28' STREET CROSS SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) 1.0' TYP SHEET INDEX P1.0) COVER P2.0) SITE LAYOUT AND UTILITIES P3.0) SITE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL P4.0) WETLANDS DISTURBANCE AND PRESERVATION P5.0) WOODLAND DISTURBANCE AND PRESERVATION L1.0) LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.0) LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS CONTACT PERSON BRIAN VOGEL, PE 1860 BOYSON RD. HIAWATHA, IA 52233 PH: 319-362-9548 FAX: 319-362-7595 EMAIL: BRIAN@HALLENG.COM APPLICANT/OWNER IC GROVE EAST, LLC %DAVE OYLER 755 MORMON TREK BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 1907 IOWA CITY, IA 52246 PH: 319-337-4195 FAX: 319-337-9823 EMAIL: DAVE@NAVIGATEHOMESIOWA.COM AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL SITE AREA: NET SITE AREA (EXCL. R.O.W.): USE EXISTING: VACANT LAND PROPOSED: MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING EXISTING: ID -RP PROPOSED: OPD RM -12 AREA TO BE REZONED: 27.68 AC. OWNER'S ATTORNEY C. JOSEPH HOLLAND 123 NORTH LINN STREET SUITE 300 IOWA CITY, IA 52245 1,205,744 SQ.FT. (27.68 AC) 1,091,316 SQ.FT. (25.05 AC) TOTAL NUMBERED LOTS : 23 TOTAL DWELLING UNITS: 78 UNITS GROSS AREA PER UNIT: NET AREA PER UNIT (EXCLUDING R.O.W.): 15,458 SQ.FT. 13,991 SQ.FT. TOTAL POST -DEVELOPED OPEN SPACE: 723,554 SQ.FT. (OUTLOT A AND OUTLOT B) (0.35 AC) (0.32 AC) (16.61 AC) SITE LEGAL /REZONING DESCRIPTION AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2011054 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 56, PAGE 37 IN THE OFFICE OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA RECORDER. NOTES 1/2 R.O.W. - 30' THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF THIS SITE IS BEING MET IN THE EXISTING REGIONAL RETENTION BASIN LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF CAMP CARDINAL BLVD. THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SOUTHERLY PORTION WILL BE ARCHIVED WITHIN THE PROPOSED DETENTION BASIN. PARKING REQUIREMENTS (30-PLEX BUILDING) MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: 1 BEDROOM UNITS = 17 2 BEDROOM UNITS = 13 TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING REQUIRED = 43 SPACES 17 UNITS X 1.0 SPACE PER UNIT = 17 SPACES 13 UNITS X 2.0 SPACES PER UNIT = 26 SPACES TOTAL VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED = 43 (INCLUDES 4 ACCESSIBLE SPACES) 14 OUTDOOR PARKING LOT PARKING (2 ACCESSIBLE) 29 INDOOR GARAGE PARKING (2 ACCESSIBLE) TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED = 22 SPACES 17 UNITS X 0.5 SPACES PER UNIT = 9 SPACES 13 UNITS X 1.0 SPACES PER UNIT = 13 SPACES TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED = 22 SPACES PROFILE LINE, Q ROW, AND SURVEY BASELINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 1/2 R.O.W - 30' 5.0' 11.0' 26' B -B 13' 13' 11.0' 5.0' STANDARD 6" CURB 2.0% COMPACTED FILL NOTES: PROFILE GRADE JOINT SEE NOTE 4 2.5' TYP 2.0% 4.00/0 1.5% Om - (MAX.) 3.5 -11 SUBDRAIN (TYP) AS SHOWN ON PLANS SEE NOTE 1 -COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED - 6" MIN. SUBBASE AS SPECIFIED -7" PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH -SEE NOTE 2 STORM SEWER WITH GASKETED JOINTS AS PER PLANS SEE NOTE 1 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF STORM SEWER LINES. SUBDRAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF STREET EVEN IF STORM SEWER IS PRESENT. WHERE PLANS SHOW THESE LINES UNDER PAVEMENT LONGITUDINALLY, SUBGRADE SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN TO TRENCHES FOR THESE LINES. THIS WORK IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR LINES UNDER INTERSECTION RETURNS. DEPTH OF SUBBASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. 2. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED OVER STORM SEWER AND/OR SUBDRAIN TRENCHES WHERE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN PROPER SUBBASE DRAINAGE. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED TO CENTERLINE OF STORM SEWER TRENCH AND COMPLETELY OVER SUBDRAIN TRENCH. 3. SEE SUDAS DETAIL 7030.104 FOR GRADING BEHIND CURB. 4. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE THIRD POINT JOINTING PER SUDAS DETAIL 7010.901 TYPICAL 26' STREET CROSS SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) SEE NOTE 2 - DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS (RM -12) MULTI -FAMILY (30-PLEX BUILDING - 1 BLDG) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 8,175 SF AREA PER UNIT: 2,725 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 60' MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 40' FRONT YARD SETBACK: 20' SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10' REAR YARD SETBACK: 20' MAX. BLDG HEIGHT: 35' MIN. BLDG WIDTH: 20' MAX. LOT COVERAGE: 50% MAX. BEDROOM PER UNIT: 3 MIN. BEDROOM SIZE: 100 SF MIN. OPEN SPACE: 10 SF/ BEDROOM, NO LESS THAT 400 SF ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY (4 -UNIT TOWNHOMES - 1 BLDG) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 3,000 SF AREA PER UNIT: 3,000 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 20'/28' MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 20' FRONT YARD SETBACK: 15' (25' AT CUL-DE-SAC) SIDE YARD SETBACK: 0710' REAR YARD SETBACK: 20' MAX. BLDG HEIGHT: 35' MIN. BLDG WIDTH: N/A' MAX. LOT COVERAGE: 50% MAX. BEDROOM PER UNIT: 4 MIN. OPEN SPACE: 150 S.F. DUPLEX (22 BLDGS) MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 6,000 SF AREA PER UNIT: 3,000 SF MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 55' WITH ALLEY ACCESS, 80' WITHOUT ALLEY ACCESS MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 40' FRONT YARD SETBACK: 15' (25' AT CUL-DE-SAC) SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5' FOR FIRST 2 STORIES PLUS 2' FOR EACH ADD. STORY REAR YARD SETBACK: 20' MIN. BLDG HEIGHT: 35' MIN. BLDG WIDTH: N/A' MAX. LOT COVERAGE: 50% MAX. BEDROOM PER UNIT: 4 MIN. OPEN SPACE: 300 S.F. PER UNIT OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED OPEN SPACE LOT 23: 30 PLEX: 10 SF/BDRM X 43 BDRM = 430 SF 4 UNIT TOWNHOME: 150 SF TOTAL REQUIRED FOR LOT 23 = 580 SF TOTAL PROVIDED FOR LOT 23 = 10,000 SF DUPLEX LOTS: 300 SF/UNIT TO BE PROVIDED ON-SITE STANDARD VARIATIONS NO VARIATIONS TO THE RM -12 STANDARDS ARE BEING REQUESTED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT. PROFILE LINE, L ROW, AND SURVEY BASELINE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 23' TO ROW 22.1' B -B 11.0' 11.0' STANDARD 6" CURB KT -2 OR L-2 JOINT SEE NOTE 4 2.00/0 PROFILE GRADE 2.0% 6.0' 5.0' 1.5% 1.0' TYP COMPACTED FILL NOTES: SUBDRAIN (TYP) AS SHOWN ON PLANS SEE NOTE 1 COMPACTED SUBGRADE AS SPECIFIED - 6" MIN. SUBBASE AS SPECIFIED -7" PCC PAVEMENT DEPTH STORM SEWER WITH GASKETED JOINTS AS PER PLANS SEE NOTE 1 1. REFER TO PLANS FOR LOCATION OF STORM SEWER LINES. SUBDRAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED ON BOTH SIDES OF STREET EVEN IF STORM SEWER IS PRESENT. WHERE PLANS SHOW THESE LINES UNDER PAVEMENT LONGITUDINALLY, SUBGRADE SHALL BE SHAPED TO DRAIN TO TRENCHES FOR THESE LINES. THIS WORK IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR LINES UNDER INTERSECTION RETURNS. DEPTH OF SUBBASE SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. 2. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED OVER STORM SEWER AND/OR SUBDRAIN TRENCHES WHERE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN PROPER SUBBASE DRAINAGE. SUBBASE SHALL BE EXTENDED TO CENTERLINE OF STORM SEWER TRENCH AND COMPLETELY OVER SUBDRAIN TRENCH. 3. SEE SUDAS DETAIL 7030.104 FOR GRADING BEHIND CURB. 4. LONGITUDINAL JOINTS SHALL BE THIRD POINT JOINTING PER SUDAS DETAIL 7010.901 TYPICAL 22' STREET CROSS SECTION (NOT TO SCALE) PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CARDINAL HEIGHTS SHEET P1.0 CAD File: I:\projects\20000\20034\20034-20\20034-20-2 CP Heights (27 AC)\DWG\Plats\20034-20-2 PP v6.dwg Date Plotted : Aug 01, 2022 - 9:19am Plotted By : BDV 25 50 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1"=50' 100 O�'O� DCIEPAO CP�NA� W ES V'c J14 PR S POTENTIAL FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCLE scensoAN CA-UFOrk sq. wofteri CONNECT 8" DIA WATER MAIN INTO EXISTING CAMP CARDINAL ROAD WATER MAIN CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING HYDRANT LOCATION AND RELOCATE OFF MAIN IF NECESSARY FOR WATER MAIN EXTENSION EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD EXISTING PCC ROAD W8 • EXISTING TREE LINE • ` .` W8 W8 W8 TEMPORARY PCC CONCRETE TO CONNECT aP `�Q`IC%� \1 DEER CREEK ROAD TO CAMP CARDINAL ROAD t Livrerod;.1.V�� CAMP CARDINAL ROAD ink 4.1 W8 5' WALK 20.36' 68.46' LOT 22 13,046 SF 0.30 AC DUPLEX (3,400 SF) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (SEE SHEET P.3 -P.5 FOR SENSITIVE AREA IMPACTS) OUTLOT B SHALL BE FOR STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND OPEN SPACE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROPOSED RETAINING WALL OUTLOT A 577,941 SF 13.27 AC OUTLOT A SHALL BE OPEN SPACE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. LOT 23 78,884 SF 1.81 AC DUPLEX (3,400 SF) PROPOSED DETENTION ALL DUPLEXES SHOWN ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY, ACTUAL DUPLEX FOOTPRINTS WILL VARY. DUPLEX COMPLIANCE WITH • 14 -3A -4C -1(a) WILL BE '9' REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF/ �%\ BUILDING PERMITTING / ss s �9 ss 3s 2� PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SANITARY SEWER PLAN OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR "THE GROVE - OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION" FtIV ATE DRNE SHARED USABLE OPEN SPACE (OUTSIDE OF EXISTING WOODLANDS) = 10,000 SF LOT 20 14,647 SF 0.34 AC • • 1 / / / OUTLOT B 145,613 SF 3.34 AC i 1 1 1 1 1 i� / 1 /1 / 1 1 1 1 DETENTION ACCESS 1 1 1 1 / 20' STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT 100' LOT WIDTH AT 25' SETBACK 4 UNITS (3,660 SF POktile • • \ CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (SEE SHEET P.3 -P.5 FOR SENSITIVE AREA IMPACTS) CONSERVATION EASEMENT • \ DUPLEX (3,400 SF) \ \ \ GRASS ISLAND TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA \\ • • • • 90' LOT WIDTH AT 25' SETBACK DUPLEX (4,030 SF) LOT 7 15,244 SF 0.35 AC ►DUPLEX ' r ■ •OT 10 I DUPLEX(4,030 SF) 110288 SF 14,030 SF) 11,413 SF I°.. 0.26 AC 1 LOTS I - 0.26AC IW 6' DUPLEX 13,319 SF 4,030 SF 6' 1 0.31 AC ( ) 85.33' 7.24' I • /D /D 11111111 105' �^ ; CENTER OF BULB TO CETERLINE OF DEER CREEK ROA COURT MACLAN OU ■r te/ sass CUL-DE-SAC 559 LF FROM TOTAL LENGTH OF 4 s°i" y •� �— ASEMEN 1.08' SS?' MAILBOX 8 ' CLUSTER 5' WIDE SIDEWALK ,nn 96' LOT WIDTH AT 25' SETBACK MAILBOX CLUSTER AND GRASS ISLAND TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA 94' LOT WIDTH AT 25' SETBACK / UPLEX (3,400 SF) LOT 13 11,597 SF\ 0.27 AC / / / / / / / / / 262.24' 408.27' //LOT 6 16,950 SF 0.39 AC 1 LOT 3 (DUP DUPLEX SF111,609 SF a, 10.27 AC W 6' 85.33' 1 LOT 2 (4,030 SF)' ~ 1 11,741 SF .i'-\ 6' 0.27 AC 1 DUPLEXI (4,030 SF)1 �. r • / —\ \\ 011/ - Iy`I�� �i �� \ :11:1; i/Ih h M1 107' LOT WIDT AT 25' SETBACK CONSERVATION EASEMENT J U) SANITARY AND STORM SEWER EASEMENT LOT B (R. O. W . ) 784 SF 0.02 AC 0) (W) (\N) (W) (m) (AA) (m) (AA) (W) — ofkovE cott LEGEND OVERSTORY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE CONIFEROUS TREE SEE SHEETS L.01 AND L.02 FOR DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN LOT BREAKDOWN LOT # PURPOSE 1-22 DUPLEX 23 MULTI -FAMILY r--1 CONSERVATION EASEMENT L__J (16.OAC) DRAWN BY: CJZ CHECKED BY: BDV APPROVED BY: BDV DATE: 08/01/22 FIELD BOOK: - - - • NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED // // // // DATE IOWA CITY HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. Leaders Land Development Since c e 2953 L,L„, 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CARDINAL HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA SITE LAYOUT & UTILITIES PROJECT NO: 20034-20-2 P2.0 CAD File: I:\projects\20000\20034\20034-20\20034-20-2 CP Heights (27 AC)\DWG\Plats\20034-20-2 PP v6.dwg Date Plotted : Aug 01, 2022 - 9:19am Plotted By : BDV z s 25 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1"=50' 100 LO'C C ppkc-x.ti O C „ i£'=s7- / / / / I( ( \ AN�NS.OPsEt-R / 7 7 602' ODES ‘yC JMP VOX)"J EPtOSNK NE,JP,ESC \ Ep� • / P1•0010:0101.04010-00‘ :0101.0PoPNCHVRCN SeT ( EXISTINSo GRAVEL ROAD W8 WB-- CAMP CARDINAL RO D 1 1 1 I:. 0- I 1M-__k�A\�A� ilk ANN! "awl;` CP N� \ \\ , Mt`• ?. \ r} }**8****** **** } "iSlAWiaWst} NOTES: 510 AN�pTM" C pA� • Gil.ily.,a4._*****w*********,*4-*,!7_ *tib P ***gyp` U, *fi n]K* PROPOSED 8' WIDE BERM @ 740.0 - �f N N { 577,941 SF 13.27 AC 1 EQUIPMENT/ MATERIAL STORAGE & STAGING AREA 7 I CONSTRUCTION l LIMITS (TYP) n / INSTALL SILT FENCE, FILTER SOCK OR EQUIVALENT PER \ SUDAS DETAILS 9040.19 & - 9040.20 EXISTING TREE LINE (TYP) 1. / 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DEPTH AND LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. INSTALL FILTER SOCK �7 BEHIND ALL DROP CUR AT SIDEWALK RAMP LOCATIONS (TYP.) 2. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PROTECT ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT OF RECORD FOR THE SITE, WHERE APPLICABLE. / 4. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALL BE KEPT ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT ALL TIMES FROM THE DATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES BEGIN TO THE DATE OF FINAL STABILIZATION. ALL OPERATORS/CONTRACTORS WORKING ONSITE MUST SIGN THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT PROVIDED AND WILL BECOME CO -PERMITTEES ON THE NPDES GENERAL PERMIT NO. 2 FOR THIS SITE. ALL OPERATORS/CONTRACTORS WORKING ONSITE SHALL BE SUPPLIED A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND MUST BE FAMILIAR WITH ITS CONTENTS. THE SWPPP MUST BE PERIODICALLY UPDATED TO SHOW CURRENT EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. UPDATED VERSIONS OF THE SWPPP WILL BE PROVIDED TO ALL OF THE OPERATORS/CONTRACTORS WHOM ARE AFFECTED BY THE CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP. IT WILL BE THE DUTY OF THE PERMITTEE (OWNER OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR) TO SEE THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP ALL ORGANIC MATERIAL WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. A MINIMUM 6" DEPTH. REFER TO IOWA CITY AND SUDAS FOR All OTHER GRADING REQUIREMENTS. 6. PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING ACTIVITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A CSR PERMIT FROM THE CITY OF IOWA CITY. 7. ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT PAVED OR HARD SURFACE ON THE SITE SHALL RECEIVE MINIMUM 6" TOPSOIL. 8. MAINTAIN SUBSTANTIAL VEGETATED AREA AROUND ENTIRE PROJECT PERIMETER TO ACT AS VEGETATED FILTER STRIP. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE OR EQUIVALENT TO ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT NO. 2. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL ADJOINING PROPERTIES FROM DISRUPTION DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 10. FILL AREAS WITHIN STREETS AND AREAS OF 4' OR GREATER FILLS WITHIN BUILDING AREAS AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN REQUIRE SOIL TESTING BY AN APPROVED GEOTECHNICAL FIRM. THESE AREAS TO RECEIVE STRUCTURAL FILL AND TESTING PER LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE TESTING RESULTS TO OWNER AND ENGINEER OF RECORD. 11. PROPER PERMITS SHALL BE IN PLACE FOR ANY GRADING ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY. 12. FINISHED CONTOURS REPRESENT FINISH GROUND ELEVATIONS. 13. ALL SLOPES TO BE NO STEEPER THAN 3.5:1. DRAWN BY: CJZ m x,32 MANMADE PROTECTED SLOPES 750 0 w INSTALL SOCK OR AROUND SILT FENCE, FILTER EQUIVALENT ALL INTAKES. / 3v� 1108 INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER SUDAS DETAIL 9040.20 (TYP) 81 (W) / (W) (AA) (W) (M) (w) (W) // CHECKED BY: BDV // APPROVED BY: BDV // DATE: 08/01/22 // FIELD BOOK: NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED DATE IOWA CITY (W)siv.� 4,04" \N's /C / HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. Loaders 3 Lend ILDvolopnlom¢ S3 coo /953 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com / (W) / - 7 / 7 PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CARDINAL HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA (/ 11/ 11 111 1 1 111 1 I 1 111 EXISTING SLOPES LEGEND CRITICAL 25% - 39% TOTAL ONSITE CRITICAL SLOPES = 328,991 SF (7.55 ACRES) TOTAL DISTURBED CRITICAL SLOPES = 63,473 SF (1.46 AC) 19.3% DISTURBED EXISTING PROTECTED 40% - 100% TOTAL ONSITE PROTECTED SLOPES = 55,031 SF (1.26 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED MANMADE PROTECTED SLOPES = 5,575 SF* (0.13 AC) *10.3% DISTURBED PROTECTED MANMADE SLOPES TOTAL TEMPORARY DISTURBED PROTECTED SLOPES = 80 SF** (0.002 AC) **FOR STORM SEWER INSTALLATION PROTECTED SLOPES BUFFER - 2' OF BUFFER PER VERTICAL FOOT (50' MAX) TOTAL BUFFER AREA = 160,919 SF (3.69 AC)* 0.9% BUFFER AREA DISTURBED (1,375 SF) *BUFFER FOR MANMADE PROTECTED SLOPES NOT INCLUDED, TEMPORARY DISTURBED PROTECTED SLOPE AND BUFFER AREA IS FOR STORM SEWER INSTALLATION SITE GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PROJECT NO: 20034-20-2 P3.0 Z s 25 50 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1"=50' 100 off -°l c NPLPo PPLO CPF1a PN�I.19, OpN\EL R 0101010601CHVRCN SeT cr N� / o�Es lyc JMP PR / • ( EXISTINSo GRAVEL ROAD / • W8 W8 W8— 602' CAMP CARDINAL RO / 375' I / I AN / EXISTING 0.020 AC WETLAND TO 16° BE REMOVED MITIGATED ONSITE / *(SEE WETLAND REPORT) \\ I \ 0 / C h/ / EXISTING 0.024 AC WETLAND TO BE REMOVED MITIGATED ONSITE (SEE WETLAND REPORT) PROPOSED WETLAND 0.030 AC \ � A 510 .. Val; 1.\\\‘ \\k‘-‘.\\'',1.‘‘.;''‘:‘,. 0 V 145,613 5FF 3.34 AC / 0 \\< i s \\ s I / DRAWN BY: CJZ CHECKED BY: BDV APPROVED BY: BDV DATE: 08/01/22 FIELD BOOK: CItt ANS P TM PS / EXISTING 0.015 AC / I WETLAND TO BE REMOVED MITIGATED ONSITE (SEE / I WETLAND REPORT) \ �s \ ,- / \ \ I / \ \--\ - I \ I \ \ \ \ I \I / \ \ \\/ 100' WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGE 4 UNIT (3,660 SF 0.34 AC CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) LOT 1,4 0.2,6 0.26 AC T A (R.O. 113,644 2. EXISTING TREE LINE (TYP) 0 w 1 MACLAN COURT Alliir.���I 1 4 ° 15' UTILITY EASEMENT f �� I LOT 3 X71 I . I11 .09 76s 0.27A �5n •6S ��761 MIS 1,597 0.27 AC 3\ 0 w LOT B (R.O.W.) 784 SF 0.02 AC 81 (W) (W) (m) (W) 7 Il / // 7 (M) // // // // REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED DATE (M) IOWA CITY HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. Loadors 3 Lend ILD4v91opr omt &mcoo 3953 L,L„L 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com / / DEER CREEK ROAD PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CARDINAL HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA 1/ I1/ I 1 I 111 I 1 I 11 111 111 WETLANDS LEGEND EXISTING ONSITE WETLANDS TOTAL EXISTING ONSITE WETLAND AREA = 39,114 SF (0.90 AC) PROPOSED ONSITE MITIGATED WETLANDS TOTAL PROPOSED ONSITE WETLAND AREA = 40,739 SF (0.94 AC) EXISTING 100' WETLANDS BUFFER (AVERAGED) TOTAL ONSITE 100' BUFFER AREA REQUIRED= 264,950 SF (6.08 AC) TOTAL ONSITE BUFFER AVERAGE AREA PROVIDED = 318,050 SF (7.30 AC) EXISTING 50' WETLANDS BUFFER (BUFFER REDUCTION) TOTAL ONSITE 50' BUFFER AREA = 49,422 SF (1.13 AC) 1 EXISTING WETLANDS TO BE REMOVED AND MITIGATED ONSITE I TOTAL AREA = 2,575 SF (0.059 AC) CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING DELINEATED WETLANDS SHOWN ARE FROM EARTHVIEW WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT #SOUTHGATE-004 WETLANDS DISTURBANCE AND PRESERVATION PROJECT NO: 20034-20-2 P4.0 1 \ \ \�/ / l\ I �\I \(I II \I\e\1// /Z( //(/ // /I / // I /\/\ i\ I /\( Il I�_l / //l I r/�--,— /��/i i \ / \\\\\\\\\\‘ \ \/IIII\\II\I\ \IIII\III \ //:///1 /1IIIII\1�\/II 1 �\ 1 / //N I / ///1 1/ Il// JDA Eli/ �//�7 7�7 \\ 1I(1 \(\ 1 111 °I / / I \ I 251/54) /75 I 110 �p�pI I I \ /I ( I I I I I \ ►I II I II III(/ via oI /¢/P C�e(%Ai0FrT I \ \ II I I \I //l/ A ; /// ii / I\ III \\\� �\7 / /di / / / / / / / l/ l /i„ // ///// /II// /I//j//I/j/1 /// / \\\\\\\ \ \\ \i \ / ,+ + + + + + + + + + + +3 2* + + + ,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + , + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ,+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + `+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ` + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 411L+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++ k+++++++++++ `++++++++++ ++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I- + + + + + + �' + + + + + + + \+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + X551e' + + S.SI SS10 CPROWP ?pole sovil-k AFS ll-feE WOODLANDS HATCH LEGEND • • DISTURBED WOODLAND AREA WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (9.35 AC) 50' WOODLAND BUFFER AREA* (3.43 AC) WOODLAND PRESERVATION AREA (10.12 AC) EXISTING TREE LINE \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + +++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + y+ + + + + + + + + sixt + + + \ + + + +�,Pt4 + + + + + + G4° Pie” + + + + + ` + + + + + +�h�c`+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ + + + + EXISTING TREE LINE (TYP) WOODLAND DISTURBANCE CALCULATIONS TOTAL SITE AREA: 27.68 AC. TOTAL WOODLAND AREA ONSITE: 22.9 AC DISTURBED WOODLAND AREAS ONSITE = 12.78 AC (55.8%)* TOTAL WOODLAND ONSITE PRESERVATION AREA = 10.12 AC (44.2%) *DISTURBED AREA INCLUDES ALL TREES WITHIN 50 FEET OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO ACCOUNT FOR POSSIBLE ROOT DAMAGE DRAWN BY: CJZ 0 0 U) _ + + + + -+ +— + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + OFFSET LINE (TYP) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +_ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + r + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f' + + + + + + + + + + +/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + +1 + / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + + +,i + + + + + + + + + , + + + + + + + + +/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / + + + + + + +/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + / / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 + + + + + // + + + + + / + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + +` + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + + + + 1\ + + + + + + + + + 1.\ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + \ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + / + + + + + + + + + + + + 1- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 ± +� + _+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 1 1 1 + + + 50' BUFFER F + + Via ± ---+ , + + + + + + + + + + + + + OlbTLdT A+ + + + t77, §41 tF + + + +1t.7+A5++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -v CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TYP) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +.' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++++++++++++, + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + +/ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + -4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "1r .i-Iisa 6 w 'cirmi .1'1!: 1.7 "vI" - - - - 1I r44, _ i LI"174%4 04 1 ,1 4. 1' - s ' ' . .21 4: ._ - A...: "14 4. 1:4:41::::74.77/4 104 410 �i��� ��i���;����i�i�i�i�i�►°i�0�►��i�����►�i►�r�i�i�i�i�: /W8 / // / / / /- / / / / / / / / EXISTNGRAVE), OAD 7 /i / _l ,L— W_- -8 —' / / / 7 /7 S1' j / / / / / / / / / I / / / / / / / / // I / / / / / � / / I / / / / / I/7 ///,/, pl /I I ( 1 / / I // w v / W8 7 /I LOT B (R.O.W.) 784 SF 0.02 AC OT SS OTSS OISS 62) CHECKED BY: BDV APPROVED BY: BDV DATE: 08/01/22 FIELD BOOK: NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED DATE IOWA CITY (w) cc cc CROVE. 0014000100, HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. Leaders in Land Development Since 1953 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 -.WW.f PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CARDINAL HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA WOODLAND DISTURBANCE & PRESERVATION PROJECT NO: 20034-20-2 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SCALE: 1"=50' 100.0.0400°-°' rTh f.crefaes' .1MP` CAiregt SS -0 372' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ PLANT SCHEDULE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE ID QTY. BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME ROOT NOTES GDE 3 Gymnocladus dioicus'Espresso' BB 40-50' H X 25-35' W; KENTUCKYCOFFEETREE MIN. OF 15" TRUNK DIAMETER AT6" ABOVE GRADE CBF 3 Carpinus betulus'Fastigiata' BB 30-40' H X 20-30' W; COMMON HORNBEAM MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT6" ABOVE GRADE CCT 2 Corylus colurna BB 40-60' H X 25-35' W; TURKISH FILBERT MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE COH 2 Celtis occidentalis 'Prairie Pride' BB 40-50' H X 40-60' W; HACKBERRY MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE COS 3 Carya ovata BB 60-80' H X 30-50' W; SHAGBARK HICKORY MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE Liquidambar syraciflua 'Rotundiloba' BB 60-75' H X 20-40' W; LSR 4 FRUITLESS SWEETGUM MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE LTT 2 Liriodendron tulipifera BB 70-130' H X 30-60' W; TULIP TREE MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT 6" ABOVE GRADE NSB 5 Nyssa sylvatica BB 30-50' H X 20-30' W; BLACK GUM MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT6" ABOVE GRADE OVE 2 Ostrya virginiana BB 35-45' H X 15-20' W; EASTERN HOP HORNBEAM MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE PTN 6 Populus tremuloides'NE-ARB' BB 35-40' H X 10-20' W; PRAIRIE GOLD ASPEN MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE PXA 4 Platanus x acerifolia'Liberty' BB 40-50' H X 50-60' W; LONDON PLANE TREE MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT 6" ABOVE GRADE QBS 7 Quercus bicolor BB 50-75' H X 40-70' W; SWAMP WHITE OAK MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE QMC 3 Quercus muehlenbergii BB 40-60' H X 50-70' W; CHINKAPIN OAK MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT6" ABOVE GRADE QRC 3 Quercus rubra 'Clemons' BB 60-80' H X 60-80' W; RED OAK MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT 6" ABOVE GRADE QRL 3 Quercus rubra 'Long' BB 60-75' H X 45-50' W; RED OAK MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT 6" ABOVE GRADE QXW 1 Quercus x warei'Long' REGAL PRINCE BB 40-60' H X 20-25' W; REGAL PRINCE OAK MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE TMH 3 Tilia mongolica 'Harvest Gold' BB 25-45' H X 20-30' W; MONGOLIAN LINDEN MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT6" ABOVE GRADE 56 TREES ORNAMENTAL / SMALL DECIDUOUS TREES ID QTY. BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME ROOT NOTES CCS 2 Cercis canadensis 'Northern Strain' BB 20-30' H X 25-35' W; EASTERN REDBUD MIN. 1.5" TRUNK DIA. AT6" ABOVE GRADE (SINGLE STEM) MIP 14 Malus ioensis 'Prince Georges' BB 10-15' H X 10-15' W; PRINCE GEORGE CRABAPPLE MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT 6" ABOVE GRADE CCF 2 Cercis canadensis 'Forest Pansy' BB 20-30' H X 25-35' W; FOREST PANSY REDBUD MIN. 1.5" TRUNK DIA. AT 6" ABOVE GRADE (SINGLE STEM) CCN 4 Cercis canadensis'NC2016-2' PPAF BB 15-20' H X 10-15' W; FLAME THROWER REDBUD MIN. 1.5" TRUNK DIA. AT6" ABOVE GRADE (SINGLE STEM) CAP 5 Cornus alternifolia BB 15-25' H X 20-35' W; PAGODA DOGWOOD MIN. 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT 6" ABOVE GRADE AAD 4 Amelanchier arborea BB 15-25' H X 15-25' W; DOWNY SERVICEBERRY MIN. 1.5" TRUNK DIA. AT6" ABOVE GRADE (SINGLE STEM) AXG 7 Amelanchier X grandiflora'Autumn Brilliance' BB 15-25' H X 20-25' W; AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE SPD 4 Syringa pekinensis'DTR' 124 BB 15-20' H X 10-15' W; SUMMER CHARM TREE LILAC MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETER AT6" ABOVE GRADE CVW 7 Crataegus viridis'Winter King' BB 15-20' H X 10-15' W; GREEN HAWTHORN MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE 49 TREES CONIFEROUS TREES ID QTY. (BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME I ROOT NOTES PAN 14 Picea abies BB 40-60' H X 25-30' W; NORWAY SPRUCE MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE PFV 20 Pinus flexilis'Vanderwolfs Pyramid' BB 20-30' H X 10-15' W; LIMBER PINE MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE PSE 41 Pinus strobus BB 50-80' H X 20-40' W; EASTERN WHITE PINE MIN. OF 1.5" TRUNK DIAMETERAT6" ABOVE GRADE 75 TREES ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY MATCHED, QUALITY SPECIMEN: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z60.1 \ \ 01 - PFV \ 01 -PSE 602' OUTLOT A 577,941 SF 13.27 AC CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (SEE SHEET -m P.3 -P.5 FOR SENSITIVE AREA IMPACTS) • 02 - COS 02 - QRC EXISTING TREE LINE ois Joss451:60.°1_ trr)"*)" tessoti•, .003 • 04 - PSE 03 - PFV 01 - PXA PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 02 - PAN 05 - PSE 03 - PFV 01 - PXA FUTURE TRAFFIC CIRCLE W8 W8 W8 W8 W8 CAMP CARDINAL ROAD 5' WALK 04 - NSB 03 - LSR 03 - PSE W8 (i�p,� (``te=-l (1 k lw I 1 I L\ \✓ 1 /�'5-° 01 - QRL 01 - QMC 01 - QRC 01 - LTT OUTLOT B 145,613 SF 3.34 AC 02 - PXA 02-CVW 01 - LSR 02 - AXG 01 - MIP 02 - QMC 02 - QRL 03 - QBS 06 - PSE 02 - QBS 01 - MIP 1 / 01 - NSB 01 - CCF 01 - COS lc 02 - SPD 03 - AXG 02 - AAD 01 - SPD PI 0 02 - CVW 01 - CAP 01 - AAD 02 - AXG 02 - CAP 03 - CVW 03 - PFV 01 - PTN 05 - PSE 04 - PAN hl 03 - GDE 03 - CBF 04 - PFV 01 - QXW 05 - PSE 02 - PAN 02 - QBS M1 0 U) 02 - PTN 01 - PAN 03 - PTN 03 - PFV 01 - PAN 03 - PSE 04 - PAN 05 - MIP 03 - PFV 04 - PSE 06 - MIP LOT B (R. O. W . ) 784 SF 0.02 AC (w) (W) (W) (W) (W) (AA) (W) (AA) (AA) (AA) (W) Goo 0 0 cc W 0 cc W 0 LEGEND OVERSTORY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE CONIFEROUS TREE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS IOWA CITY CODE 14-2B-6: C-3, 14-5E, & 14-5F LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING ZONING: EXISTING: ID -RP PROPOSED: RM -12 RM -12: LOW DENSITY MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH: RS -8 WEST: RM -12 SOUTH: CC2 EAST: ID -RS, RS -5 TREE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTI -FAMILY: 14-5E-8 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 1 TREE/550 SF BUILDING SPACE BUILDING SPACE: 24 BUILDINGS TOTALING: 98,800 SF 98,800/550= 179.64 TREES REQUIRED/PROVIDED: 180 BUFFERS/SCREENING PER 14 -2B -6:C-3 LANDSCAPE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS NO SCREENING REQUIRED AS PROPOSED MULTI -FAMILY BUILDINGS BLOCK VIEW OF DRIVEWAYS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES. LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS TREES REQUIRED/PROVIDED: 180 DRAWN BY: CJZ CHECKED BY: BDV APPROVED BY: BDV DATE: 08/01/22 FIELD BOOK: • - - • NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED // // // // DATE IOWA CITY HALL & HALL ENGINEERS, INC. (Leadless in Land! Development Sii c e 2953 L,L„, 1860 BOYSON ROAD, HIAWATHA, IOWA 52233 ,` PHONE: (319) 362-9548 FAX: (319) 362-7595 CIVIL ENGINEERING . LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING • LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING www.halleng.com PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, AND SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CARDINAL HEIGHTS IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN PROJECT NO: 20034-20-2 L1.0 CAD File: I:\projects\20000\20034\20034-20\20034-20-2 CP Heights (27 AC)\DWG\Plats\20034-20-2 PP v6.dwg Date Plotted : Aug 01, 2022 - 9:20am Plotted By : BDV GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. BEFORE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK, CONTACT IOWA ONE CALL (1-800-292-8989) OR 811 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR DAMAGE TO UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES IMMEDIATELY AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 2. PRIOR TO PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE SHALL APPROVE PLANT LOCATIONS. FIELD ADJUSTMENTS OF PROPOSED PLANT LOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO MINIMIZE POTENTIAL INTERFERENCE WITH EXISTING UTILITIES, TO MINIMIZE HAZARDS TO PLANT GROWTH AND TO IMPROVE MAINTENANCE CONDITIONS AND/OR IN CONSIDERATION OF OTHER FACTORS. 3. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, ALL TREE PLANTING LOCATIONS SHALL BE FLAGGED AND PLANTING BEDS SHALL BE DELINEATED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CONTACT THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE ONE WEEK PRIOR TO ANTICIPATED PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION DATE FOR LAYOUT APPROVAL. 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL AT LEAST MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" (ANSI Z60.1 -LATEST EDITION). 5. PLANT QUANTITIES ARE FOR CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE. DRAWINGS SHALL PREVAIL WHERE DISCREPANCIES OCCUR. 6. NO PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBSTITUTED WITHOUT THE AUTHORIZATION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 7. PROVIDE A MINIMUM 3" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TREE RINGS. MULCH RINGS FOR TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM SIX FOOT (6') DIAMETER. ALL MULCH BEDS AND TREE RINGS SHALL CONTAIN SPADE/SHOVE CUT EDGING AT MULCH EDGE. 8. NURSERY TAGS SHALL BE LEFT ON PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE HAS COMPLETED THE INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. 9. CONTAINER GROWN STOCK SHALL HAVE THE CONTAINER REMOVED AND THE ROOT BALL CUT THROUGH THE SURFACE IN TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. 10. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND WRAPPED OR CONTAINER GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND. ALL ROOT WRAPPING MATERIAL MADE OF SYNTHETICS, METALS, OR PLASTICS SHALL BE REMOVED AT TIME OF PLANTING. 11. AS NEEDED, STAKE ALL NEWLY PLANTED TREES RELATIVE TO WIND EXPOSURE. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SET PLUMB TO GROUND AND FACED FOR BEST APPEARANCE. AS NECESSARY, PRUNE DEAD BRANCHES OR THOSE THAT COMPROMISE APPEARANCE AND STRUCTURE TO A MAX OF %3 THE PLANT. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL WATER AND MAINTAIN ALL SEEDED AREAS AS WELL AS ALL PLANT MATERIAL UNTIL GROUND FREEZES. MAINTENANCE IS INCIDENTAL AND INCLUDES, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, WEEDING, MULCHING, AND OTHER NECESSARY RELATED OPERATIONS UNTIL INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. INITIAL ACCEPTANCE IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE DATE AT WHICH PLANTING AND MULCHING, ETC., PER LANDSCAPE PLAN, HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GUARANTEED TO BE IN VIGOROUS GROWING CONDITIONS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR FROM DATE OF INITIAL ACCEPTANCE. REPLACE ALL PLANT MATERIAL UP TO ONE YEAR OF INITIAL ACCEPTANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS. ALL PLANTS THAT ARE DEAD OR IN AN UNHEALTHY OR UNSIGHTLY STATE ARE REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 14. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE FULL SURFACE RESTORATION IMPLEMENTED BY MEANS OF TURF GRASS LAWN SEED AND/OR SOD, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY/COORDINATE WITH OWNER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL SEEDING APPLICATION NOTES ARE LISTED IN SOD/SEED APPLICATION NOTES. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW SEED MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION & INSTALLATION, OR SUDAS SPECS/DESIGN STANDARDS OR CITY STANDARDS, AS APPLICABLE. 16. FOR ALL OTHER LANDSCAPING WORK NOT ADDRESSED VIA MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS OR NOT COVERED WITHIN THESE GENERAL NOTES, CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW SUDAS OR CITY STANDARDS AS APPLICABLE. THE PLAN AND NOTES ON THIS SHEET SHALL SUPERCEDE SUDAS OR CITY STANDARDS AS APPLICABLE 17. ALL TREES TO BE PLACED WITHIN PARKING LOT ISLANDS ARE TO STRICTLY FOLLOW APPLICABLE SUDAS OR CITY STANDARDS. 18. ALL LANDSCAPE TO BE INSTALLED PER APPLICABLE SUDAS OR CITY STANDARDS. 19. NURSERY SOURCE FOR LANDSCAPE PLANTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE WITHIN A 500 MILE RADIUS OF IOWA CITY, IOWA AND GROWN IN A CLIMATE ZONE OF 5A OR COLDER. 20. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION. DO NOT ALLOW ADDITION OF TOPSOIL, PLANTING SOIL OR MULCH TO DETER POSITIVE DRAINAGE OR TO CREATE AREA OF LOCALIZED PONDING. BED PREPARATION AND MULCHING NOTES 1. IMPORTED TOPSOIL, IF REQUIRED, SHALL BE: FERTILE, FRIABLE, NATURAL TOPSOIL, WITH A CLAY CONTENT NOT EXCEEDING 30% AND ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT NOT LESS THAN 5% FREE FROM LUMPS, COARSE SANDS, STONES, ROOTS, STICKS, AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL, WITH ACIDITY RANGE OF BETWEEN Ph 6.0 and 6.8. 2. PLANTING SOIL: PLANTING SOIL (i.e. BACKFILL AREAS AROUND ROOT BALLS AS SHOWN ON TREE/SHRUB INSTALLATION DETAIL) SHALL BE AMENDED. THOROUGHLY MIX 4 PARTS TOPSOIL, 1 PART COMPOST, 1 PART SAND. TOPSOIL SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED WITHIN THE NOTE ABOVE. COMPOST SHALL BE FINELY SCREENED GRADED TO PASS SIEVE AS FOLLOWS: -MINIMUM OF 85% BEING 1/4" OR SMALLER (DRY BASIS RESULT). -MINIMUM OF 70% BEING 5/32" OR SMALLER (DRY BASIS RESULT). -WITH CLUMPS OR PARTICLES 3/4" DIAMETER OR GREATER. SAND SHALL BE C33 WASHED CONCRETE SAND, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 3. PRIOR TO MULCHING ALL PLANTING BED AREAS, APPLY COMMERCIAL GRADE PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR APPROVED EQUAL), PER MANUFACTURE'S DIRECTIONS, TO ALL PLANTING BEDS. SEED/ SOD APPLICATION NOTES 1. IF TURF GRASS LAWN SEED ALTERNATE IS USED IN LIEU OF SOD, ALL SEEDING APPLICATION AREAS SHALL PER SUDAS TYPE 1 LAWN MIX. ALL TURF GRASS SEEDED AREAS SHALL HAVE S150 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLED. 2. ALL TURF GRASS LAWN AREAS, WHETHER SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ARE TO BE PLANTED AND INSTALLED AS PER SUDAS SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEEDING OR SOD. 3. ALL TURF GRASS SOD TO BE OF THE SAME PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND SPECIES OF SUDAS TYPE 1 SPECIFICATIONS. SURFACE RESTORATION APPLICATION NOTES 1. ALL TURF GRASS LAWN SEED, SHALL BE PER SUDAS TYPE 1 LAWN MIX APPROVED EQUAL 2. ALL TURF GRASS LAWN AREAS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ARE TO BE PLANTED AND INSTALLED AS PER THE SUDAS SPECIFICATIONS. STAKING NOTES: (SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR MORE DETAIL). Si. STAKING WIRE S2. RUBBER HOSE SET LOOSE LESS DETRIMENTAL GROWTH S3. STEEL FENCE POST STAKE DIAMETER. DRIVE STAKES 6" BELOW ROOTBALL. TO ALLOW FOR TRUNK TAPER AND DRIVEN INSIDE MULCH RING TO 1'-0" INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL TREE & SHRUB PLANTING NOTES: 1. REMOVE TOP 3 OF WIRE BASKET AND BURLAP ONCE PLACED INTO PLANTING HOLE. REMOVE ALL SISAL AND SYNTHETIC TWINE. 2. TRUNK FLARE SHOULD BE EXPOSED BEFORE DETERMINING PLANTING HOLE DEPTH. 3. PLANT TREE WITH TRUNK FLARE 1-2" MAXIMUM ABOVE ORIGINAL GRADE, AVOID PLANTING TREE TOO DEEPLY. 4. PLANTING HOLE TO BE AT MINIMUM 3 TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOTBALL AT SOIL SURFACE, SLOPING TO THE WIDTH OF ROOT BALL AT BASE. PLANTING HOLE WIDTH NEAR SURFACE IS INCREASED TO 5 TIMES THE WIDTH OF ROOTBALL WHEN SOILS ARE HIGHLY COMPACTED OR HEAVY IN CLAY CONTENT. 5. SCARIFY PLANTING HOLE TO HELP ELIMINATE THE CREATION OF A SOIL INTERFACE. 6. PLACE ROOTBALL ON COMPACTED & LEVELED SUBGRADE 7. REMOVE EXISTING SOIL FROM EXCAVATED PLANTING PIT AND REPLACE WITH PLANTING SOIL. WHILE BACKFILLING, WORK PLANTING SOIL AROUND ROOTBALL TO MINIMIZE LARGE AIR POCKETS AND ENSURE BETTER VERTICAL SUPPORT. 8. AVOID MOUNDING MULCH & MAKING CONTACT WITH TRUNK. FORM MULCH RING SAUCER TO HELP HOLD WATER DURING ESTABLISHMENT. DIAMETER OF MULCH AREA SHOULD BE CLEAR OF GRASS, WEEDS, ETC. TO REDUCE COMPETITION WITH TREE ROOTS. 9. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 10. UNDISTURBED SOIL SEE PLANTIN SOIL SURFACE SOIL SURFAC -III-III-III-I I -III-III-I 11=11 11 0 IIr1: Revised August 25, 2022 Fri I . I 1171111111 111 19111, ■1111 1i11!LI Ihk Al kT RPIL Ad B� as II 11 I1 i` 1111Ii 'SII 1111 IIII Y ii. .YI:II :f! II 191 1 Exterior Elevation 1116" = 1•0" PlyGern Wicker Cardinal Pointe Heights AUGUST 2, 2022 PlyGem Vintage Dublin PlyGern Modern I run Fax River Ridgestone PlyGem Wicker anomminamit'ilL•11 PlyGem Vintage Dublin PlyGem Modern Iron Fox River Ridgestone FUSION ARCHITECTS. INC. Iuipi ■■■I L17,! 01, Exterior Elevation 1/16" 1'.0" PlyGern Vintage Dublin PlyGeir l rcker Fox River Ridgestone PlyGem PlyGem PlyGcm Wicker Modern Iron Vintage Dublin Cardinal Pointe Heights AUGUST 25, 2022 PIyCem Mocier'i Iron Fox River Ridgestane FUSk"N Af2CH ITECTS. INC. m:=1 I ri3j3"' - is 4Plb. Ad 1 ••. I Exterior Elevation -1116" = -1,.0,' Cardinal Pointe Heights AUGUST 25, 2022 Fox River PlyGem Vinyl PlyGem Vinyl Ridgestone Modem Iron Wicker RP 1 PlyGem PIyO rri PlyGem Wicker r..1oderri Iron Vintage Dublin Fox River Ridgestone PlyGem Vinyl PlyGem Vinyl Modem Iron Wicker Fox River Ridgestone FUSI'-"N ARCHITECTS. INC.. Summary Report for Good Neighbor Meeting 1CITY OF IOWA CITY Project Name: Cardinal Heights Project Location: East of Camp Cardinal Blvd, west of Camp Cardinal Rd Meeting Date and Time: February 1st, 2022 - 5:30pm to 6:30pm Meeting Location: Zoom Meeting Names of Applicant Representatives attending: F. Joe Hughes - Navigate; Jason Walton - Navigate Brian Vogel -Hall and Hall; Susan Forinash -HHE Names of City Staff Representatives attending: Anne Russet - Senior Planner Number of Neighbors Attending: 7 Sign -In Attached? Yes No X General Comments received regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary) - Neighbors were not particularly excited about potentially losing some privacy and seeing the private woodland area behind their home being disturbed. Applicant explained the closest proposed home will be approximately 400' from any existing home and will be buffered by existing woodlands and drainage way. The proposed development will be at an elevation of at least 50' higher than the existing homes. Old trees were cut down but never removed from previous work that started but was never completed. Concerns expressed regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary) - Project will cause increased traffic Storm water runoff Proposed building proximity to existing homes Construction trash Will there be any changes made to the proposal based on this input? If so, describe: Added additional stormwater detention basin Added proposed trees along north boundary to provided additional screening for existing homes Staff Representative Comments From: Tom Bender To: Anne Russett Cc: Rob Bender Subject: Rezoning REZ22-0001 Date: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 10:00:00 AM Attachments: image001.png imaoe008.onq image009.png imaoe010.onq Anne, I am an owner of Cardinal Villas at 30 and 80 Gathering Place Lane. I received notification of the rezoning request for IC Grove East and while I am generally in favor of the request, I do have some comments; It appears that Deer Creek Road will be stubbed to Camp Cardinal Road with the intention of later adding a traffic circle. If this connection is to provide 2ndary egress, it would be potentially putting an increased amount of traffic on a section of gravel road from the intersection southward to Gathering Place Lane. This section of road has been the source of erosion in the form of gravel washing down into the intersection of Camp Cardinal Road and Gathering Place Ln. The increase in traffic on the gravel portion will create more dust and the intersection of Camp Cardinal Road and Camp Cardinal Blvd is already a dangerous place to pull out of due to the reduced visibility on the curve and the high speed of traffic (well above posted limit) on Camp Cardinal Blvd. Perhaps a signal at that intersection would help. All that being said, I like the project and I believe it will add synergy to the area. Tom Thomas J Bender Assurance Property Management 52 Sturgis Corner Drive Iowa City, IA 52246 Partner 319-530-7333 319-358-0556 tom@assu ra nce pm .com www.assurancepm.com July 18, 2022 Ms. Anne Russett Neighborhood & Development Services City of Iowa City Re: REZ22-0001-& SUB 22-0001Cardinal Heights 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 522404826 Dear Anne, Thank you for the note regarding this planned rezoning by Hall & Hall Engineers. I will be out of town during your meeting. This looks like a nice addition to our neighborhood and as a homeowner i would welcome them to our community. I am not on the Cardinal Ridge HOA any longer, however, was the longest serving board member in the HOA history. I was proud to volunteer and recently welcomed other residents to take their turn. I do feel that more than anyone else-- that I understand the wants and needs of Cardinal Ridge and feel that —_ _---a aners would welcome this new neighbor. All the best with your forts, d R. Beussink Cardinal Ridge Homeowner d rb From: Jo Emerson To: Anne Russett Subject: East of Camp Cardinal Blvd Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 2:47:48 PM Consideration should be given to Increase in traffic on Camp Cardinal Blvd, which has already increased substantially in the last nine years. Aesthetically the new development could impact property value of some existing homes in that area. In my opinion, townhomes and duplexes would fit in best rather than large apartment complex. Sincerely, Mary Jo Emerson 839 Camp Cardinal Rd Sent from my iPhone This email is from an external source. July 31, 2022 Ms. Anne Russett Urban Planning City of Iowa City 410 E. Washington St Iowa City, IA 52245 Dear Anne, Re: REZ22-0001 and SUB22-0001 Cardinal Heights My name is Mark Gedlinske, and I live at 834 Ryan Court. I am an adjoining neighbor to the proposed rezoning property. I have several concerns about the rezoning and development plan, and am not a supporter of the plan. I grew up on the east side of Iowa City and went through the Iowa City schools. A few years ago, I was in the market for a new house. Because trees were a requirement for me, I began the search for lots that had wooded views. There were not many available! My current lot was one of them; others were in neighboring towns. I knew that the property behind me was zoned as a research park, and that gave me some confidence that perhaps the trees wouldn't be clear- cut. Given the slopes and the wetlands, it actually didn't look very buildable. If the current rezoning and development plan were approved, the result would be a dramatic reduction in the woodlands, wetlands and wildlife habitat. It would be a huge blow to a neighborhood that has seen the removal of hundreds of trees in the past three years. I oppose the proposed rezoning and development plan for several significant reasons: • Woodlands • Drainage — and implications with the existing creek near my property • Wildlife Interestingly, in the Staff Report (prepared by Esther Tetteh), page 2 of the Background Information section starts off by saying that "The site contains regulated sensitive features including wetlands, woodlands, and slopes", and further describes that the "...Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan proposes impacts to wetlands and modifications to the 100' wetland buffer requirement (14-5i-6), which requires a Level II Sensitive Areas Review." Those statements raised an immediate flag with me, since they align with my major concerns: wetlands; woodlands; slopes. These three areas all work together, and changes to any ONE of these will affect the others. The proposed plan describes changes to ALL three of these, which is my first sign that perhaps this isn't a good idea. Woodlands. The trees on the proposed property create a pleasing, natural setting. They're beautiful and provide a wonderful canopy. But they serve a larger purpose. They provide a habitat for wildlife and help control runoff and erosion. Roots hold the soil, stabilize the slopes, and hold water that would otherwise run off. One area of specific concern is the northern Page 1 of 4 section of the proposed development - the northern cul-de-sac with the duplexes on the hillside. My concern is twofold: the severe destruction of existing trees, and the clearcutting of the slopes where the duplexes are proposed. Not only would we lose the trees and the canopy, but would then have additional runoff, erosion and drainage from houses built on the slope. Here are sections from proposed Site Grading and Erosion Control document (P3.0) and Woodland Disturbance document (P5.0). This shows the slopes involved with the duplexes on Lots 6 and 7, and how they encroach the critical and protected slopes. Page 2 of 4 CONSTRUCTION UNITS (TYP) This shows the significant area of woodland destruction, compared to the small area of woodland preservation on the north (the left side of the diagram). Drainage / Creek. There is a creek that is to the south of our properties on Ryan Court. This creek has seen varying amounts of water over time, and it seems like the water has been increasing. The creek certainly caused erosion near the Ryan Court properties — particularly the eastern -most, and this erosion is getting worse. My concerns are several: - How will this be affected by drainage from the proposed Cardinal Heights development, especially with the removal of trees? The amount of water will increase. - How will this creek be affected by the pond — and the significant housing development - on the west side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard? It appears that there are already signs of increased water in the creek. - What are the concerns with the proposed sewer line being so near this creek? Page 3 of 4 My concerns are heightened by watching recent news of severe flooding in Missouri and Kentucky. We should be thinking about how similar "water events" may affect us. I would not be surprised to see the creek and surrounding areas flooded. Wildlife. I see wildlife every day. Turkeys, deer, owls, raccoons, bees, butterflies and numerous birds are common. Of course, any new development area destroys wildlife habitats, but this area seems to be a key refuge. Endangered species: I remember being told at a previous HOA meeting about a protected animal in the proposed rezoning area, and I mentioned this at the Good Neighbor Meeting. One of the meeting presenters told us that this was the Indiana Bat. The Indiana Bat is on the endangered list. Are there other such issues? I strongly disagree with the rezoning and development (Case No. REZ22-001 & SUB22-001), due to concerns about woodlands, drainage and wildlife. The proposed plan squeezes a sizable amount of development in a small portion of the total 27.68 acre property. The proposed development encroaches, overlaps and adjoins regulated sensitive wetlands, woodland and slopes. It seems like a bad idea to me. Mark Gedlinske 834 Ryan Ct Iowa City, IA 52246 Note: Several years ago, a path of existing trees was cut down in the proposed rezoning area — supposedly for a future sewer for the new development on the west side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard. This is when our HOA was told that the timing of the cutting and removal of the trees was limited, because of the endangered species in that area. (The trees were cut, but never removed. This created quite an eyesore. Here is one example. My hope is that the current property owner/developer is a much better steward of the land). Page 4 of 4 Dan and Cindy Fishburn 832 Ryan Court Iowa City, IA 52346 August 1, 2022 Via E -Mail Only to: arussett?iowa-city.org The Iowa City Piannin.g and Zoning Commission RE: Case No.: REZ 22-0001 & SUB 22-0001 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission: We own the property at 832 Ryan Court which adjoins the area of the proposed rezoning and subdivision. We purchased this property in October of 2018 as a second home. Our primary residence is in northwest Illinois. We plan to retire and permanently reside in Iowa City within the next two years. We were attracted to this property because of the wooded area behind our home. We are opposed to the rezoning and the subdivision plan for the following reasons: • The tree canopy on the subject property is composed mostly of mature Large trees including all the trees on the hillside overlooking our home. In addition to providing a beautiful landscape, the trees provide a habitat for wildlife and control runoff and erosion down the hill to the creek that borders our property. One of the reasons we purchased our home was that we were confident in looking at other developments in Iowa City that the city was very pro -active in preserving green space between subdivisions, As stated in the City's Comprehensive Plan "the city should encourage subdivisions to not only preserve environmental areas but incorporate them as assets in the overall development for public open space." The proposed plan does not meet this objective. Specifically, Lot 6 and Lot 7 (see the drawing attached to this letter) will be built on the sensitive slope which overlooks our home. These units should not be built on the slope and the tree canopy should not be removed in this area for two reasons. First, to preserve green space between our subdivision and the new development. Second, to stabilize the slope and preserve erosion control into the creek behind our home. 2 • We are concerned regarding the storm management plan, not just for the riew development but for the entire neighborhood given the expansive development which has occurred to the west of Camp Cardinal Boulevard. The staff report indicates that all storm water management requirements are being met in the existing regional retention basin located on the west side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and the proposed storm water retention basin in Outlot B of the proposed project. However, with the development of Cardinal Point West and Grove Condominiums LLC, all of the tree canopy and erosion control on the west side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard has been or will be removed. We want to be assured that the existing storm water management plant has taken into account all of the development west of Camp Cardinal. Can the city assure us that in the event of a St. Louis or Kentucky type of rain event that the existing pond on the west side of Camp Cardinal will control all of the runoff or is there a possibility that the pond could overflow Camp Cardinal Boulevard which would put our homes in jeopardy? * At some point in time, Iowa City and Coralville will need to address the traffic situation on Camp Cardinal Boulevard. Driving on Camp Cardinal frequently resembles a NASCAR race, and the 35 mile per hour speed limit (25 miles per hour at the Kennedy intersection) is largely ignored, There is Little, if any, enforcement of the speed limit by either Coralville or Iowa City, and since Camp Cardinal Boulevard. includes a bike lane on both sides of the boulevard, it places bikers at great risk. Adding to the traffic flow is the soon -to -open four -corner intersection being built at Preston Lane, and with this proposed rezoning there will be another intersection at Deer Creek Road. Further compounding the traffic congestion is the substantial amount of construction traffic (dump trucks; cement trucks; and dirt hauling trucks) that for six days of the week uses Camp Cardinal as access from Melrose to Second Street in Coralville. • Southgate and their related companies which include the owner of the subject tract and Navigate have not been stewards of the forest or the environment. They removed a substantial number of mature trees in March of 2019 all along the creek which adjoins our homes. Southgate assured us at our annual HOA meeting in the fall of 2019 that the dead trees would be removed. They are still on the property and are a real eyesore, particularly in the winter when they are clearly visible. Further, a number of years ago, when Southgate or their related companies turned over Outlots A & D of Cardinal Point South (to the east of Ryan Court), they left all the silt fence and construction debris on the property. There are hundreds of yards of silt fence and posts which were never removed. Those properties are now owned by the HOA. We certainly hope that this type of issue will not be allowed to occur with the proposed development. 3 For the reasons stated above, we are opposing the re -zoning and subdivision approval as proposed. Thank you for your consideration, Dan G. Fishburn CindyL. Fishburn Enclosure From: Erik Winborn To: Anne Russett Cc: Esther Tetteh; Josh Slattery; Mark Gedlinske; Hedlund Steve; Dan Fishburn Subject: Winborn and Hedlund Statements in Opposition to Navigate Home"s Rezoning Request Date: Monday, August 1, 2022 3:18:50 PM Attachments: We sent you safe versions of your files.msq Winborn Statement P&Z Aug 1.pdf Hedlund Statement before P&Z, Aua 1.odf Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Dear Ms. Rusett We share a duplex with Steve and Chris Hedlund. Their address is 864 Ryan Ct, Iowa City and our address is 862 Ryan Ct. The Hedlund's and us are adjacent to the property that is subject to the rezoning request on Camp Cardinal Blvd. We attached our written statements that we would like the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider. We also request that the statements be included in the administrative record for the rezoning request. Unfortunately, the Hedlund's and us are out of town and will not be able to testify in the public meeting on Wednesday. Dan Fishburn and Mark Gedlinske sent you written statements earlier today. We would like the record to reflect that we agree with their statements. We appreciate the work you and your staff have done on the rezoning request. Sincerely Erik and Carol Winborn This email is from an external source. STATEMENT OF ERIK AND CAROL WINBORN Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission Presented on August 1, 2022 We appreciate the opportunity to submit a statement in opposition to Navigate Homes application to rezone property located east of Camp Cardinal blvd. from Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) to Low Density Multi -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) We own a home at 852 Ryan Ct immediately adjacent to and north of the property subject to the rezoning request. When we purchased our home in 2016, we relied or the existing zoning on our adjacent property. We never expected that the City of Iowa City would amend the Comprehensive Plan to indicate that 8-16 Dwelling Units/Acre would be appropriate in the property at issue. We prepared our statement based on information from the following: • Information provided by Navigate Homes representatives during a February 1, 2022, virtual meeting. • The location map and Draft Planned Development Overlay Plan and Preliminary Plat enclosed with a letter from Ms. Anne Russett, Senior Planner, Neighborhood and Development Services, dated July 6, 2022 • A cursory analysis of the Staff Report reviewing the rezoning application. Since the Staff Report was published on July 29, 2022, we didn't have the opportunity closely analyze the Staff Report. We strongly urge the City of Iowa City to deny the application to rezone the property as requested by Navigate Homes, The proposed rezoning and Planning Development Overlay will significantly harm our property, our neighborhood, the City of Iowa City, and the environment. The harm includes the following: • Storrnwater runoff from the development will cause serious erosion on the creek south of our home. • Stormwater runoff will pollute the creek, Clear Creek, and the Iowa River (the creek flows into Clear Creek, a tributary of the Iowa River) • The development will destroy woodlands, trees, and greenspace. • The development will be harmful to wildlife, including bobcats, wild turkeys, fox, coyotes, and bald eagles that pass through the woodlands along the creek. 1 + The development detracts from the residential and natural character of our neighborhood and will harm our property values. Our most serious objection to the proposed rezoning and development plan is that it will damage the environment in our area and streams downstream from where we live. We understand from comments made by Navigate Homes and Planning and Zoning Commission staff that stormwater runoff on the north side of the development will be diverted into a retaining pond on the west side of Camp Cardinal Blvd. After a heavy rain, pond water immediately rises over the outlet drain in the pond and rushes down the creek behind us causing erosion, The erosion has become worse since 2016 as development increases on the west side of Camp Cardinal, The creek is dark Tike a Colorado stream in a burn area after a heavy rain. Navigate's application with IC Grove East's development plan in the agenda packet does not cover the stormwater runoff environmental impact and erosion along the creek flowing from the retention pond to Clear Clark. Moreover, the Staff Report does not address the problem. A representative of Navigate Homes promised us a copy of their drainage plan during a virtual meeting held on February 1, 2022. Navigate Homes never provided us the promised copy. We would like a copy so that we can have an independent expert review the plan. Navigate Hames drainage plan must include expert analysis of how stormwater runoff will impact the rezoned property, the creek, and our property. We would life the City Engineer to review the plan and seek our comments on the plan. If the City of Iowa City approves the rezoning and development, we request that Navigate Homes be required to protect and restore the creek behind our home by reducing stream bank erosion, minimizing the dawn -cutting of the stream bed when constructing the planned sewer line, and restoring the natural stream system. As part of the restoration, we urge that rocks, logs, and native plants be used to slow down the stormwater. In addition, the stormwater diversion into the pond will pollute the creek behind us, Clear Creek, and the Iowa River. The stormwater runoff from the development's streets, driveways, and roofs will include chemicals, fertilizers, construction debris, pet waste, petroleum products, and winter deicing chemicals. The development will remove and destroy vegetation on the north slope that would have absorbed and filtered water into the soil. The Staff Report does not address the pollution problem caused by the development and how Navigate Hames will prevent pollution. The trees on the property at issue are majestic. They overlook the hillside, creek, and rise above Ryan Court. They are home to numerous bird species and fireflies shine on summer nights from the grass and low-lying shrubs to the tops of the trees. The City's Comprehensive 2 Plan states that "the City should encourage subdivisions that not only preserve environmental areas but that incorporate them as assets in the overall development or public open space," We urge that any rezoning restrict development and removal of trees and greenspace on the north slope of the property to protect environmentally sensitive areas, regulated slopes, and the stream corridors in the property. The Staff Report at page 7 points out that the subject property has 22,9 acres of woodland, and the development will only preserve 10.12 acres of woodland (44,2%). Fora City that prides itself in protecting the environment and woodlands, the destruction of the woodlands is unacceptable. If the City of Iowa City does not regulate the construction and development an hillsides and woodlands along Camp Cardinal Blvd, driving down Camp Cardinal will be like driving through West Virginia looking at mountain tops permanently scarred by coal strip mining. A plethora of wildlife travel along the creek behind our home and fly overhead in the trees above the creek. Deer, wild turkeys, bobcats, coyotes, and fox walk along the creek and hawks and owls sit in the trees above the creek, Four years ago, a bald eagle perched in a tree behind us staring at us and surveying the woodlands. When we took his picture, he posed for us. We suspect other bald eagles have perched closer to the retention pond looking for fish. The proposed development on the north slope of the property will harm their habitat. Since the development as originally proposed will damage regulated slopes, interfere with natural drainage on the north facing slope of the development, and cause erosion on the slope due to removal of trees and vegetation on the slope, we urge the City Engineer to closely scrutinize the proposed development. We're confident the City Engineer will ensure our environment is protected and Navigate's plan complies with local, state, and federal environmental laws and regulations. We also urge that the Planning and Zoning Commission delay consideration of the rezoning request to give the public more opportunity to comment. Although the development will significantly impact our neighborhood, the rezoning application appears to be on a fast track as directed by IC Grove East, LLC and then Navigate Homes dating back to January 2022. This is when the City of Iowa City Comprehensive Plan was updated to indicate that 8-16 DU/A would be an appropriate land use for the property at issue. Although aur neighborhood wrote to the Planning and Zoning Commission in October 2018 expressing our concerns with potential rezoning, we weren't specifically asked to comment on proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan, The City of Iowa City did not conduct public workshops and hearings for questions and comments on the proposed update (We attached a copy of our October 12, 2018, letter). The Comprehensive Plan describes how extensively the City of Iowa City sought public participation in preparing the original Comprehensive Plan several years ago. The Plan describes public workshops the City of Iowa City conducted on the east and west sides of the 3 Iowa River in 2012 as part of the public participation process. The City of Iowa City didn't follow this process in updating the Plan in January 2022 even though the updated Plan severely impacts cur neighborhood. The Staff Report does not mention the October 12th letter. The Staff Report on page 7 describes public correspondence expressing concerns about traffic and property values. Our objections are much more important than traffic and property values. Our objections go to the very core of being stewards of our environment and preserving wetlands, woodlands, and streams. Page 17 of the Staff Report contains a summary report of the "Good Neighbor Meeting" conducted by Zoom on February 1, 2022. It was nice that we were invited to participate in the meeting. However, our recollection of the meeting is different than what is described in the summary's general comments. The summary states that "Neighbors were not particularly excited about potentially losing some privacy and seeing the private woodland area behind their home being disturbed." Since this was a "Goad Neighbor Meeting", we didn't view the meeting as an advocacy session. Our goal was to gather more information about the proposed development and offer constructive suggestions. We asked questions about storrnwater runoff, stream erosion, removal of trees and green space, pollution, and the proximity of the project to homes en Ryan Court. Navigate's answers were vague and never addressed the environmental problems posed by the development. We submitted our statement today, August 14t to give staff the opportunity to amend their Staff Report to reflect the deep opposition that our neighborhood has to the project. We received a letter dated July 6, 2022, announcing the Planning and Zoning Commission would review the rezoning application from IC Grove East, LLC and receive comments at a public meeting tentatively scheduled for July 20, 2021 We understand IC Grove East, LLC requested a delay, The Planning and Zoning Commission is now scheduled to meet on August 3, 2022, to consider an application from Navigate Homes to rezone the property that IC Grove East, LLC earlier requested be rezoned. The planning documents in the Staff Report reference IC Grove East, LLC. Are these companies related? Will Navigate Homes submit their own documents to support their rezoning application request? When we attended the "Good Neighbor Meeting" we were never told who would be applying for the rezoning. Under well- established environmental laws, regulations, and case law the property owner bears ultimate responsibility for compliance with environmental laws and regulations and is responsible for fines and penalties. Who owns the property? Does Navigate Homes have standing to apply for the rezoning? If so, they haven't provided any documents to support their application. After we attended the February 1, 2022, meeting we didn't hear anything from Navigate Homes regarding aur questions and fallow -up. Suddenly in July there appeared to be a rush to apply 4 for rezoning and conduct a public meeting. This fast-track process disadvantages the property owners on Ryan Court because we and our outside experts have not had time to review the petitioner's development and drainage plans prior to the August 3rd public meeting. In addition, we have the issue of who is the applicant and do they have the capability to develop the property in an environmentally responsible manner. Due to the issues we raised in our statement, we request that the Planning and Zoning Commission delay action until we have time determine who is the applicant, are they a responsible developer, and how will the development impact our neighborhood and the environment. Another reason for the delay would be to give us time to submit our petition in opposition to the rezoning. Cur neighborhood is unanimous in opposition to the rezoning and development. We need until the end of August to secure notarized signatures on the petition from all the property owners on Ryan Court. Iowa City is a great place to live and work. The City of Iowa City focuses an people, the environment, education, sustainability, inclusion, diversity, equality, and culture. We respectfully urge that the City of Iowa City continue its emphasis on the environment by either rejecting the rezoning request or accepting the rezoning request subject to substantial changes to the development plan that would prevent development on the north slope, preserve woodlands, and control stormwater runoff to protect the creek behind our home, Clear Creek, and the Iowa River. Signed on August 1, 2022, by Cetjz-o-C//0141 Erik Winborn Carol Winborn 5 Mr. Michael H. Hensch Chairman Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission 410 E. Washington St. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Chairman Hensch: October 12, 2018 We are homeowners in the Cardinal Pointe Subdivision in western Iowa City near Camp Cardinal Boulevard and are members of the Cardinal Pointe South Homeowners Association. We would like to express our concerns in advance of what could he a request to rezone 27,68 acres of property (Parcel ID 1112401008) south of our l or es and subdivision. The property is owned by Iowa City Grove LLC (a Southgate company) and is zoned Interim Development - Research Park. The Iowa City Assessor classifies the property as agriculture property with an assessed value of $20,410 and the owner will pay $148 in taxes for tax year 2017. Urban Acres Reals Estate recently listed the property for sale for Iowa City grove LLC. The property is listed for sale for $1,990,880 and is described as "tremendous development land with great potential for a multi-farnily subdivision." The real estate listing includes pictures and preliminary site layouts for high-density mufti -family units. When we purchased our Maines, our builder, Advantage Custom Builders (ACB), and AC6's realtor, Urban Acres, promised most of us that the wooded area and wetlands south of our property would not be developed and that it was protected by a restrictive covenant, We paid a premium for our homes relying on these promises. in addition, we and our realtors were aware that the Comprehensive Plan did not allow for the construction of high-density multi- family units on the property, We never expected anyone would seek to rezone the property to change the character of our neighborhood. We fully support Iowa City's vision expressed in the Comprehensive Plan for the policy of growth and development in our neighborhood and western Iowa City. We expect Southgate and any future owner of the property adjacent to our subdivision would use the property in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Iowa City's zoning requirements. if the property owner petitions to rezone the property, we expect the owner's proposed use would also comply with the Comprehensive Plan. As neighboring homeowners directly impacted by any request to rezone the property, we will closely follow any discussion to rezone the property. We understand that the Planning and Zoning Commission has detailed rules that allow for public input in the rezoning process_ We appreciate the Commission's requirements for notice, analysis, comment, and a hearing and the Commission's reputation for fairness. We would like it known to the owner and a future owner of the property at issue that we would firmly oppose any attempt to rezone the property for high-density multi -family units as advertised by Urban Acres Real Estate's property listing. if the property owner petitions to rezone the property for high-density multi-fan,iiy units, we would have a number of concerns with the rezoning, including the following: • The rezoning would not be consistent with Iowa City's Comprehensive Plan. • The rezoning is not necessary, since there is sufficient property on the west side of Iowa City for high-density multi -family residential use, • The rezoning would not be consistent with surrounding residential use, • The rezoning would hurt our property values after we had relied on the zoning established in the Comprehensive Pian. • The rezoning would adversely impact public safety by causing an undue and unplanned burden on fire protection, police protection, and other emergency services. • The rezoning would significantly increase traffic and would affect the safely of children in the subdivision, including their travel to and from Rorlaug Elementary schools and other schools. • The rezoning would impact the safety of bicyclists, who regularly travel along Camp Cardinal Road (a popular travel route for bicyclists oa the west side of Iowa City). • The rezoning will lead to construction and development that will harm the streams and wetlands in and around the property_ We look forward to working with the Planning and Zoning Commission on future development initiatives to ensure that Iowa City remains a unique and appealing place to live for people of all ages as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan_ Sincer ly; 4 er,44/ Erik and Carol Winborn 852 Ryan Court wa City, loup,� , #5' ack and Donna Muller 854 Ryan Court Iowa City, Iowa f R ndy and Robin Matejcek' 853 Ryan Court Iowa City, Iowa Steve and Chris Hedlund 864 Ryan Court Iowa City, Iowa Mark Gedlinske 834 Ryan Court Iowa City, lows } t J e Christ + •her 844 Ryan Court Iowa City, Iowa e4:- r e CIA A ti Alan and Gale Elgar 842 Ryan Court Iowa City, Ionia !Gyle Austen 1052 Ryan Court Iowa City, €qwa Dave anti Debra Aegerter 852 Ryan Court Iowa City, Iowa Dan and Cindy Fishburn 832 Ryan Court Iowa City, Iowa f"4af-i3.-.moi Becky Crane 824 Ryan Court Iowa City, lnwa STATEMENT OF STEVE AND CHRIS HEDLUND Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission Presented on August 1, 2022 Thank you for the opportunity to state our opposition to Navigate Homes' application to rezone property located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd. from Interim Development -Research Park (ID -RP) to Low Density Multi -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12). We own a horne at 864 Ryan Ct. Our home is a duplex, Our neighbors in the duplex are Erik and Carol Winbarn_ We are adjacent to the northeast corner of the property subject to the rezoning request. Before we offer our views of the rezoning request, we agree with the statement Erik and Carol Winborn submitted on August 1, 2022. We incorporate their statement with our statement. We have lived in Iowa City for over 5D years and have been active in the community supporting charitable and civic activities_ We are proud to be citizens of Iowa City and have devoted time and energy to make Iowa City a better place to live and work. When Steve practiced dentistry, he routinely provided free dental care to the underserved. As longtime citizens of Iowa City, we are disappointed that the City of Iowa City did not actively seek our input when it amended the Comprehensive Plan to support rezoning of the property at issue to 8-15 Dwelling Units/Acre, We joined our neighbors in sending a letter (a copy is attached) to the Planning and Zoning Commission in October 2018 objecting to rezoning without input. No one replied to our letter, and no one specifically asked for our views of proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan. We're also disappointed that it appears the City of Iowa City is rapidly considering the rezoning application without giving us time to review the request, seek outside expert advice, and submit comments. We expect better from the City. We built our home in 2014 and were the first residents to live beside the property to be rezoned, When we built our home, we never dreamed that we would be fighting the battle we are fighting today to preserve the environment behind our home and the character of our neighborhood. Nobody foresaw that the Comprehensive Plan would be amended to support high density development and that a developer would request rezoning for a development that would damage our property with stormwater runoff, significantly reduce woodlands, and threaten the sensitive area behind our home. The applicant proposes to drain stormwater runoff into a retention pond on the west side of Camp Boulevard. The pond drains into a creek that runs on the south side of our home and then makes a sharp turn north on the east side of our house, Our property line is Tess than 10 yards from the creek. The creek has been significantly eroding during the eight years we have lived in our home. Erosion has become worse as development increases on the west side of Carnp Cardinal Blvd. Stormwater runoff is diverted into the pond versus being absorbed by trees, vegetation, and soil. For example, a large section of creekbank collapsed last year into the creek after a heavy rain. Heavy rains cause the pond to overflow and water races down the creek eroding the banks. If the development is approved, the runoff in our creek will include pollutants from the streets, yards, and roofs of homes and buildings in the development, We can't tell from the agenda whether Navigate Homes or JC Grove East, LLC is the applicant. In any case, neither party addressed how they will control stormwater runoff. If the rezoning and development is approved, it is imperative that the approval be subject to restoring the creek beside our home to prevent future erosion. We also oppose the rezoning application and development due to its impact on the woodlands and sensitive areas behind our home and the homes of our neighbors. As the Staff Report indicates, the development will preserve only 10.12 acres of the 22.9 acres of woodland on the subject property. The woodlands are close to environmentally sensitive areas, including the area behind our house. We urge the City to limit the area to be developed to preserve the woodlands. These woodlands protect our watershed, sensitive areas, and are home to wildlife. The woodlands must be preserved. The Comprehensive Plan's Community Vision Statement stresses the City will strive to protect and enhance the environment and encourage responsible use of our naturaf resources. The Comprehensive Plan an page 6 describes the City's broad support for riverfront improvements to make it more attractive and a focal paint for the entire community. The rezoning and proposed development detracts from these initiatives by destroying woodlands and causing polluted stormwater runoff and silt from eroded creekbanks to flow through the Iowa City riverfront. We also agree with Erik and Carol Wiriborn and our other neighbors in urging the Planning and Zoning Commission to delay consideration of the rezoning request to give the public more opportunity to comment. Although the development will significantly impact our neighborhood, we been given only 5 days to review the application and the Staff Report. It obviously took the applicant or another entity months to prepare the rezoning request and accompanying documents. It's impossible for us to review and prepare comments on the application in 5 days. As 50 -year residents of Iowa City, we have never experienced this rush to judgment. In closing we urge that the City of Iowa City deny the rezoning request and Planned Development Overlay. If the City approves the rezoning, we request that the rezoning be subject to substantial changes to the Planned Development Overlay. The Overlay should not allow development of the north slope of the property to preserve woodlands, wetlands, and the creek beside our property. The applicant should also be required to restore the creek and prevent stormwater runoff that will cause erosion in the future and pollution from stormwater runoff. Signed an August 1, 2022 Steve Hedlund Chris Hedlund From: To: Subject: Date: Ernie Galer Anne Russett Rezoning concerns Tuesday, August 2, 2022 2:34:39 PM Commimission Members, Subject rezoning South of Ryan Ct.: Our major concerns are drainage and the removal of trees coming down the slope toward our homes. We are going to request that the two buildings at the north end of the project shown on the plan (4 units) be eliminated so that trees will not be removed coming down the hill. We also want the City to understand that we have major concerns with drainage. We are experiencing erosion in the drainage creek behind our homes, particularly at the east end. We believe the City needs to update the storm water management plan for the entire area given all of the recent construction activity. Ernie Galer 822 Ryan Ct. Sent from Mail for Windows From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Cindy Lebsack Anne Russett dan.fishburnc comcast.net Iowa City Zoning Hearing August 3 Tuesday, August 2, 2022 8:21:32 PM We are Michael and Cindy Lebsack and live at 802 Ryan Court, Iowa City. We share the same concerns and agree without reservation on all points listed in the letters written by our neighbors (Hedlunds and Winborns). We look forward to attending the upcoming meeting on August 3rd to convey our support for the opposition of this project. Thank you. Michael and Cindy Lebsack STATEMENT OF JOHN & DONNA MULLER AUGUST 3, 2022 RE: REZONING APPLICATION BY NAVIGATE HOMES As owners of a property at 854 Ryan Ct. in Iowa City purchased 11/2014, we were informed by both realtor and builder for the sub -division the property directly south of our property would not be developed as it was had restrictive covenant that protected it from removing this green space and certainly had strong impression on the purchase of this property. Obviously, that changed with the future development of the west side of Iowa City. In October 2018 we joined other Cardinal Pointe association members in requesting a meeting to voice our concerns with the future development impact to our properties with the construction of the real estate west of Camp Cardinal Blvd. As trees were downed but not cleared the landscape was forever changed and even though this is west of a most busy street the impact on our properties has been immediate and continues. A copy of this joint letter has previously been provided you. As we had in 1990-92 personally developed a smaller parcel of land we were made aware of Planning and Zoning Commission's commitment to preservation of green space and woodlands as we negotiated over several months with adjoining property owners in answering their concerns regarding water run-off, drainage issues and naturally preserving the abundant assortment of trees. That we know continues yet today in the future development in all of Iowa City and thus the reason for my letter to request the delay in approval of this rezoning application. Fellow association members have submitted similar requests to stop this fast -tracking approval as there are issues that need to be addressed that in a zoom meeting in February 2022 were brushed aside and not fully addressed. With the current run off from the west side developments and the future sewer extension to be place next to what was once a clear running stream at the base of my property to now a dirty, muddy out of the banks catch basin for the entire area that will only become more severe than there must be remedies that need to be addressed. I see that this was delayed as requested by Navigate Homes from approval decision a month earlier so it would ne prudent and simply logical for addressing my and others in the Cardinal Pointe Association concerns. The letter from Erik Winborn asks multiple questions that have not been properly addressed. As my last resort to ger this rezoning delayed we are requesting the declination of this application until these concerns are addressed. John & Donna Muller 854 Ryan Ct, Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 5 of 15 Craig stated if there is support, she would like to amend her motion to allow more flexibility for other businesses that may come in and include an allowable opening time of 6:00 a.m. Elliott seconded the amendment. Craig is very excited to see something going back in this building, it was sad to see it sit empty. Hensch agreed noting it's a perfect use to have as Neighborhood Commercial and supports it. A vote was taken and the motion with amendment passed 6-0. CASE NO. REZ22-0001 & SUB22-0001: Location: East of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Rd An application for a rezoning of approximately 27.68 acres of land from Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Low Density Multi -Family zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) and an application for a preliminary plat of Cardinal Heights, a residential subdivision with 22 duplex lots and 1 multi -family lot. Tetteh began the staff report showing the area of the site which is east of Cardinal Boulevard and west of Camp Cardinal Road. The subject property is currently zoned ID -RP which allows only plant related agriculture or hold a property until it is prepared for a use to be identified. North of the site is zoned RS -8, to the east is RS -5 and ID -RS and west is RM -12 with a Planned Development Overlay. The applicant is proposing to extend Duck Creek Road to provide access to the development. The proposal is to rezone 27.68 acres of land to Low Density Multi -Family zone with a Planned Development Overlay. The RM -12 zone provides for high-density single- family housing and low-density multifamily housing. It also provides for diversity in the housing types. The Planned Development Overlay allows a mixture of uses; however additional criteria set forth in the multifamily sites development standards must be met. The preliminary OPD and Sensitive Areas Development Plan proposes a total of 23 lots and the applicant is proposing 22 duplexes, 4 townhomes and 30 multifamily units. The 4 townhomes and 30 multifamily units will be located on lot 23 and the 22 duplexes will be located on lots 1 to 22. The development is also proposing a cul-de-sac and one loop street for traffic circulation on the site. The preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan also includes woodlands, wetlands and slopes. Tetteh stated Planned Development Overlay applications are reviewed in compliance with the following standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Ordinance. The first standard is the density and design is compatible with and/or complementary to the adjacent development, second is the development will not to overburden existing streets and utilities, third is the development will not adversely affect views, property values and privacy, fourth is the land use and building types will be in the public interest. The rezoning is also reviewed according to two criteria, first consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and two, compatibility with the existing neighborhood. Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 6 of 15 The first criteria as density and design is compatible with adjacent development. The OPD/RM- 12 zone allows 15 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is proposing 3.1 dwelling units per acre with 78 dwelling units for the entire site. They are also proposing two family uses which are duplexes and multifamily uses which will be an extension of the existing duplex and multifamily developments in the area. The preliminary OPD also shows garage fronts in the front facade of the of the duplexes. The OPD requires that access to garages needs to be from an alley or the rear of buildings, however if the garages are accessed from the front of the buildings, they need to be recessed in order not to dominate the streetscape. The applicant is aware of this and this will also be checked at building permit and site plan stages. Tetteh showed a rendering of the proposed 30 -unit multifamily building. The development is proposing 10,000 square feet of private open space on site for the townhomes and the 30 -unit multifamily which exceeds the required 580 square feet. They are also providing 300 square feet of onsite open space for each duplex. The applicant is also proposing to construct Maclan Court and Maclan Loop to provide access to the site. The development will be accessed of off Camp Cardinal Blvd through an extension of Deer Creek Road. A secondary access will be provided by Camp Cardinal Road in future when it is constructed, and a traffic circle will also be constructed at that time. As a condition of the rezoning staff is recommending that prior to the issuance of building permits the owner contributes 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards. This 50% will include the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. Regarding the second criteria, the subject property is serviced by both sanitary sewer and water. The stormwater management requirements are being met in the existing stormwater regional detention basin west of Camp Cardinal Boulevard. The development is also proposing a new stormwater management detention basin in outlot B. The development consists of two outlots, approximately 16.61 acres of land, to be placed in a conservation easement. For the third criteria Tetteh noted the closest neighbors will be to the north and southeast of the subject property. To the north they are separated by approximately 13.7 acres of woodland in outlot A. Southeast of the property is also separated by woodland in outlot B. This development will not impact neighboring residents more than any conventional development. Moving on to criteria number four, land use and building types will be in the interest of the public. The applicant is not requesting for any waivers from the underlying zoning requirements. The proposal also incorporates two-family uses and multifamily uses which will provide housing diversity in the housing types. They are also proposing 60% of the site area will be contained in the outlots A and B. The proposed developments balances environmental protection with the need for increased housing. Tetteh stated there is not a district plan for the proposed site and the Future Land Use map of the Comprehensive Plan allows 8 to 16 dwelling units per acre. As noted earlier, the applicant is proposing 3.1 dwelling units per acre, which is below what is allowed. The Comprehensive Plan also encourages diversity in the housing types the applicant is proposing 2 -family uses and multifamily uses. The Plan also encourages the preservation of sensitive areas and guide developments away from such areas. As noted the development is proposing to preserve 60% of the site area. The Plan encourages pedestrian oriented development and attractive and functional streetscapes that make it safe, convenient and comfortable to walk. This development Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 7 of 15 proposes sidewalks around the proposed streets and also connects to the existing sidewalk system around Camp Cardinal Boulevard. The Comprehensive Plan discourages cul-de-sacs however, the due to sensitive features on the site it is necessary. Regarding compatibility with the existing neighborhood, to the north the sites there are duplexes, which the applicant is proposing as well. To the east there are multifamily uses and to the west are growth sites which will provide for new multifamily buildings. Tetteh noted the proposed development will impact wetlands and man-made slopes, hence the level two sensitive areas review as required by the Commission and City Council. The sensitive areas ordinance requires 100 feet buffer between wetlands and developments, wetland buffer averaging may be permitted when necessary, and as justified by a wetland specialist. The applicant is proposing a wetland buffer averaging to the northeast wetland to accommodate leveling of some lots. The applicant is also proposing a wetland reduction buffer for the southeast wetland which also needs to be justified by a wetland specialist. The size consists of approximately 0.90 acres of wetland and 0.059 acres are proposed to be disturbed. The applicant is proposing to mitigate the wetlands on site by the ratio of 1:2 for the northeast wetland and 1:1.5 for the southeast wetland. The site also consists of critical slopes of which there are 7.55 acres of critical slopes, of which 1.46 acres are proposed to be impacted, which is 19.3%. The City Code allows up to 35% of disturbance. There are also 1.26 acres of protected man-made slopes of which 0.13 acres will be impacted. The site has 22.9 acres of woodland, the proposed development will impact 12.78 acres, which is 55.8%. An additional 3.43 acres will remain unimpacted but will be located in a 50 -foot wetland buffer area. A total 10.12 acres of woodland would be preserved which is 44.2%. The required woodland retention rates is 20%, which this development is above. Staff reached out to the state archaeologist, and it was noted that a study was conducted in 2004 and there are no current concerns with the site. Russett stated related to the preliminary plat portion of this application, Tetteh covered most of that, but Russett wanted to summarize what the applicant is proposing with the platting. Again, it's 22 duplex lots and one multifamily lot. Outlot A to the north of the site is around 13 acres and that will be for open space which will be maintained by the homeowner's association. Outlot B to the southern end of the site will be for stormwater management and open space to be managed by the homeowner's association. There will be a conservation easement area which will be land that will be protected from development in the future. Staff has received several questions on how stormwater will be managed, stormwater will be accommodated by the existing regional basin located on the west side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and by an onsite stormwater basin on the southeast corner of the site and outlot B. Russett showed an image that was prepared by Hall & Hall Engineering to show the location of the site that will drain to the onsite basin and the general direction of water flow. The regional basin was designed to accommodate future development in this area including the site of the proposed rezoning. The City stormwater specialist visited the site this afternoon and he noted that all basin inlets structures are open and their discharge drainage ways show no signs of erosion. He also took a look at the creek at the northern end of the site to examine any signs of erosion and did note that the slope north of the basin there's about 15 feet of the area that does show signs of erosion on the north end of the creek. He was only able to make it in about 150 feet from Camp Cardinal Boulevard because the area is heavily vegetated but for the most part, the creek is heavily vegetated and there weren't any signs of erosion except for that portion on the north end. Public Works staff has reviewed the Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 8 of 15 preliminary stormwater management plan as well as the plat and those have been approved. In terms of neighborhood open space, the City does require the dedication of public open space or a fee in lieu at the time of planning. Based on the 27 acres in the RM -12 zone, the developer would be required to dedicate 1.87 acres of land to the City or pay a fee in lieu of land dedication, and in this case that fee in lieu would be appropriate. Russett noted staff received several pieces of correspondence from neighboring residents. This information has been passed on to the Commission. There were two letters expressing support for the rezoning and preliminary plat. There were several pieces of correspondence that expressed concerns related to traffic, impact on property values, stormwater, woodland impacts etc. Staff recommends approval of REZ22-0001, a proposal to rezone approximately 27.68 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Road from Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone subject to the following condition: 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. Staff also recommends approval of SUB22-0001, a preliminary plat for Cardinal Heights. In terms of next steps, upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission staff will request that Council set a public hearing for September 6. Hensch asked if for the erosion on the north creek, can there be some requirements made to a restoration of that erosion. Russett noted the sanitary sewer is going to run along the creek and needs to be constructed. Public Works staff has approved to provide sanitary sewer to the west side of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and when that gets installed and the City receives construction drawings for the layout, Public Works will be looking at things like erosion and what needs to be mitigated. Hensch asked if there will be a sidewalk on the east side of the development, particularly from the new street with the proposed roundabout down to where Gathering Place Lane would be so if somebody lived there and wanted to walk to that church they could. It seems like a good idea if they're going to build a road there to put a sidewalk. Russett said they are asking the applicant to contribute to the construction of Camp Cardinal Road so it would be a City project and at that time the City would install a sidewalk. Hensch asked about the measurement from the north property line to the closest residential lot in the development north of there. Russett replied it is 408 feet. Hensch noted he was out there today and actually saw the inspector, he was looking around at elevations and it looks like north looking south there's a decrease in elevation, then it goes back Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 9 of 15 up. So if someone is a resident on the north side in the existing houses what they would see now there is mature trees. Hensch noted in the landscaping plan they will put in coniferous trees along where that sanitary sewer is, but the brush is so thick there, will the trees go in after the sanitary sewer goes in. Russett confirmed that was correct. Hensch noted there wasn't a grading plan so it can be assumed that no area outside of the 23 lots will be graded, Russett confirmed that. Hensch noted regarding the topography and the flow of water, it doesn't seem like water can flow uphill so how is that storm drainage going to occur. Russett noted it is higher in that area and to the northwest it gets lower so water will be flowing north and then west and into the basin. Craig stated the plan keeps referring to 22 duplex lots and one multifamily lot but what about those townhouses, are they on the multifamily lot. Russett confirmed they are included in the multifamily lot. Craig asked just for a little bit of history because she is always sympathetic to people and it was evident from some of the comments that they got that say homeowners were told certain things when their homes were built about zoning, and why things are zoned in sort of a holding place for development to come. Russett noted it is because the area wasn't ready because of infrastructure for development at the time. Most of the interim development zones ultimately get rezoned at the time of development. Craig had a question about the creek and the erosion, after the sewer line is put in and any mitigation is done for the creek erosion, after that if more erosion were to occur, it is the homeowner's responsibility to fix it. Russett noted if the creek is on private property then the private property owners are responsible. Hensch noted in one or two of the letters there's concern about trees that were cut down and were never removed, are those in areas that are controlled by the HOA's. This Commission always has concerns about HOAs who don't take care of their outlots and do the preventative maintenance that needs to be done in these areas. Padron asked about the multifamily building with 30 units, on the floorplan it shows like a three- story building, but then on the elevation it shows as a four-story building. Russett noted it would only be allowed to be 35 feet which would be no more than three stories. The maximum height in the zone is 35 feet. Townsend asked if any of those 78 units will be affordable housing. Not that Russett is aware of. Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 10 of 15 Elliott asked will people in on Ryan Court be able to see these buildings. Russett is not sure, they don't really have a any type of visual study that was done. Hensch opened the public hearing. Jason Walton (Director of Development, Navigate Homes) has read the report prepared by the staff and agrees and on behalf of Navigate Homes would ask the Planning and Zoning Commissioners to approve this plan as followed by the City's zoning ordinances. Signs asked about the proposed multifamily building, it's proposed as a 30 -unit complex with 43 total bedrooms, so he is assuming a bunch of one -bedroom units being proposed. Are these units going to be rental units or owner -occupied units. Walton is not sure at this point, it depends on what the market shows but it could be a variety of both. Signs noted on the backside of that multifamily building there seems to be some slope adjustments being done there. Will there be a fairly substantial retaining wall there. Walton confirmed there will be a retaining wall on the backside of the building where there parking. He believes it will be an 8 -foot wall. Brian Vogel (Hall and Hall Engineers) answered the question regarding elevation, that cul-de-sac on the north end will be around 755 elevation, and the south property line is around 695 so there's about 60 feet elevation difference from the property line to that cul-de-sac. Hensch asked what the distance from the multifamily structure to those houses on the north side is. Vogel replied it will be at least 800 feet or so. Hensch asked that because the concern for neighbors and understand this is always their view. They're very used to the view they've had for years. People are vociferously opposed to development because of their view shed changes. Elliott asked what the people on Ryan Court will see, these buildings or trees. Vogel explained Ryan Court is 50 feet lower than this development area but there is woodland between them and the development. Hensch asked regarding the trees they're going to plant after the sanitary sewer is put in. The landscaping plan notes coniferous trees but how tall will they get. Vogel responded they will be full trees that should get fairly tall. Dan Fishburn (832 Ryan Court) and his wife Cindy reside in a duplex that would be the closest to the development on Ryan Court. He also wrote a letter but wants to review some of their concerns. First a couple of comments on the testimony, that 400 feet is going to be affected by elevation. He doesn't know exactly how far above them those those northerly duplexes are going to be in the development but it's not a flat surface, they're going to be significantly higher than his home and he is sure in the wintertime after the leaves come down, there's going to be definite sight to those northerly units and they're asking that those two lots that contain two buildings be eliminated from the plan for that reason. To conclude that there isn't going to be any effect on privacy rights or property values is incorrect. The issue with the trees that were cut down, that was not an HOA issue. Southgate came in on their property three and a half years ago and took Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 11 of 15 all the trees down in the area where they're going to put that sanitary sewer in, and they're still there. These are large, mature trees. They don't feel that Southgate has been a particularly good steward of the environment. They promised at the HOA meeting two and a half years ago that those trees would be removed, particularly in the wintertime they are very unsightly. The creek erosion, Fishburn is not sure if this creek is on the new HOA property or if it's on theirs but believes it will be on the new Property Owners Association. That creek is served solely as drainage for the regional basin on across the street. Fishburn noted in his letter they're concerned about drainage and staff indicated that they're relying on a stormwater management plan that was done quite some time ago and he wonders does that take into consideration all of the development at Cardinal Point West, which has taken place across the street and has been entirely recontoured. And the other parcel that was recently rezoned, which will be for Growth Condominiums LLC, with two large buildings, all of that slopes downhill to that regional basin. Fishburn's concern is coming down that hill and they think that green space to the top of the hill should be preserved and those two units on the north end should be eliminated because they're going to be within their view as that's a very steep hill there. They'd like to see that green space preserved, it has all mature trees on it, as far as putting these new trees in that may help somebody 50 years from now when those trees grow up to be 50 or 60 feet tall but in the short run, new trees aren't going to block their view at all. He will be long gone before those new trees they that they're putting in will provide any privacy, but they do appreciate it. Their area that adjoins the outlot, that outlot does not have any trees, that's just bare land and it's kind of developed into a natural prairie. They're concerned about the sightlines. Fishburn also did say something in his letter about the traffic situation, which he realizes isn't really their issue but sooner or later, Camp Cardinal Boulevard traffic is going to need to be addressed in terms of speed limits with bicycle riders and heavy construction traffic. Overall they are concerned about the sightlines and concerned about the stormwater management plan. Fishburn pointed to what happened in St. Louis and Kentucky the last two weeks and if they have a rain event like that, is that basin going to be able to handle it or are they going to be in a situation where they could potentially have water come over that road. On Ryan Court there are seven buildings with 14 owners, they're all duplexes in that circle there, are all adjacent property owners. They would ask that the Commission take all these matters into consideration, and at the very least modify the plan. Mark Gedlinske (834 Ryan Court) stated he is in the same duplex that Dan Fishburn is in and agree absolutely with all of his comments and notes. Gedlinske would like to highlight a couple things, his concern, just like Fishburn's, is on the northern end. Those in that part of the cul-de- sac that he'll be looking at from his house. He can stand out on his deck right now and look straight across at the base of those trees, the trees that will be gone, and duplexes will be built there. So he will look out the back of his house, look up the hill, and he'll be able to see the people sitting on their decks in their backyards, and they'll be able to look and watch everything he's doing in his house. So from a privacy perspective, he certainly thinks this is reducing his privacy, his view, probably his property values. So the statement that was made that this is not going to have an effect, he just doesn't understand that at all. Anytime there is that drastic removal of the trees, it's just a painful to see. He also would like to see if those duplexes on the north end could be moved back or eliminated or something just to get them off that downward Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 12 of 15 slope, that would be much better, it'd be easy to hide things behind trees up there. The other thing with that downward slope is everything from those northern duplexes he doesn't know how can possibly drain across Camp Cardinal and into the pond, it's going to run right down and follow gravity down into the creek and further cause either some erosion of that area or run offs of whatever fertilizer and pesticides that's all going to come right down the hill. There isn't any way to defy gravity. Gedlinske has this image of houses on a hillside out in Los Angeles, and they're overlooking everybody else and that's what they're going to end up with here. He'd like to see if that that plan could be moved a little bit or those properties move back south to get them off that downward slope. The one thing that hasn't been brought up is they've heard over the years that there is an Indiana bat that is an endangered species that's on that property. Gedlinske is unsure if it's still there and doesn't know who monitors that or what the effect of this development is. They heard that brought up in the past when that swath of a 40- or 50 -foot area of trees was cut down, the trees that are still lying there. The timing had to be right to not disturb the Indiana bat. He doesn't know if they have resources to take a look at that but it's a concern that was brought up and then never mentioned. Otherwise he agrees with all Fishburn's other points. Hensch closed the public hearing. Signs moved to recommends approval of REZ22-0001, a proposal to rezone approximately 27.68 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Road from Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) zone to Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone subject to the following condition: 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. Signs also recommends approval of SUB22-0001, a preliminary plat for Cardinal Heights. Townsend seconded the motion. Signs began by reiterating a statement he has made many times, if you don't own the property, you don't have control of property. That's the mantra he has espoused in the six some years he's been on the Commission. He also finds the view shed argument questionable and noted that the poor people on top of the hill in the new duplexes will have to look down the back of duplexes at the bottom of the hill so how is that any different. Regarding the removal of trees, he agrees with the concern, and has noted it before, of Southgate's stewardship of some of the properties they have, and in some of the disturbances they do, but it is probably within their right as a property owner to do it. He also wanted to note the distances here are 400 to 1000 feet of distance between the new units and the in the old units is a huge amount of distance, he has about 40 feet between him and his neighbor in the back. The property owner or developer are already sacrificing, rightfully so, and developing in the manner of a conservation development that is usually looked favorably upon, where they try to condense construction into smaller areas to in Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 13 of 15 order to preserve larger areas of natural space and he thinks that they're doing that to the tee on this development. Regarding the stormwater access to cross Camp Cardinal, he hears what they're saying, but there's already an existing stormwater connection underneath Camp Cardinal Road, from the east side to the west side, towards the bottom of the hill, so he doesn't think it's going to be running over land, it's going to be going into stormwater sewers and channeled through the sewer system into that basin. As far as the capacity of that basin, it's his understanding and belief that was designed as part of the entire master plan of that whole area, which was considered to be developed at some point, so he would assume that it was designed to hold the capacity and if it wasn't, then someone will have to take care of correcting it at some point. The only other issue Signs would have is on the property value issue that came up on several points. He is a realtor in town and can say this won't have any impact on property values, absolutely zero. This is a different development and property values are really much more related to development in like kind, so he doesn't think that that's a relevant issue. Craig supports the proposal, she drove out there today and it feels like this has the potential to be almost identical to the Ryan Court development, it's sort of a mirror of that as it has a multifamily section, and it has beautiful houses. The area has developed differently than maybe the City thought it was going to 20 years ago, but it's developed with beautiful residential homes and she expects that these will be more beautiful residential homes. She is sympathetic to people who want to stand on their deck because that's the way they bought their property but this is in the City and they can see from Deer Creek Road there's a stub in on the other side of the street which means something's going to go in there. She thinks this is an appropriate development for that area and is in favor of it. Padron is also in favor of development and basically agrees with everything Signs said and every time there's a development a neighbor complains about the views from their house being affected and she finds it very selfish, to be honest. Townsend noted it amazes her the way that whole development has come up, she can remember when there was nothing out there and to see a subdivision like this being developed in that area, it's what's needed so will be agreeing. Elliott does support the application, stating it does meet all the City requirements. Hensch noted he does have three concerns, one is he is completely sympathetic to people who feel like their realtor told them one thing but looking right at a realtor for he has great respect for, their job is to sell the property. They're not going to mislead someone, but they're not fortunetellers and can't for 100% certainty tell someone what the zoning is going to be in the future. The second thing is, he has a growing sensitivity to viewsheds, before his eight years on this Commission it was something he didn't give much thought to because he lives in town and his view shed was 20 feet to his neighbor. But he is sympathetic to that and does understand that. However, since the nearest property is going to be 400 feet, in town that's almost unheard of. Nobody's that far away from each other in town. All the properties on Ryan Court are just beautiful and he had the exact same feeling that Craig had driving through there that this development is going to mimic largely Ryan Court, and overall is going to be a great development. Hensch's only negative concern is that water is a big deal to him, especially erosion, so he has concerns about that unnamed creek on the north edge. He is asking the Planning and Zoning Commission August 3, 2022 Page 14 of 15 neighbors to keep the City and the developers feet to the fire about that and if there's erosion occurring hold people responsible to fix that. When the sanitary sewer goes through, that's when there's disruptions that occur and it has to be put back together in a way that is natural and aesthetic and doesn't have erosion. Townsend noted the other thing really talked about were trees that have been there for ages that haven't been taken away and there's several places here in Iowa City where the trees fell down during the derecho and they're still down. So she is hoping there's a way that as good neighbors, they could get whoever is in charge of doing that to get rid of those. Hensch noted it was brought up the question about the Indiana bats, there is a limitation on when their habitat can be disrupted or when trees can be cut down, there's some periods of times where trees can't be cut down because of breeding season. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: JULY 6, 2022: Elliott moved to approve the meeting minutes of July 6, 2022. Townsend seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Russett noted that at last night's City Council meeting they approved the historic preservation code amendments which the Commission saw a couple of months ago. Elliott noted regarding the coffee shop on Bowery, she has been to the one downtown and they use all glass, nothing is a single use utensil, so that is really nice. Townsend noted she was concerned when they built the coffee shop across from HyVee on North Dodge but now sees how packed it is and well utilized, so nice to see. ADJOURNMENT: Townsend moved to adjourn. Craig seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. August 28, 2022 Dear Mayor Teague and Members of the City Council: Navigate Homes applied to rezone property east of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and West of Cab Cardinal Road (Parcel Number 1112401008 of the records of the Iowa City Assessor). Part of tie property is in the Camp Cardinal Creek watershed and is adjacent to property owned by the Cardinal Point South Homeowners Association and is south of homes we own on Ryan Ct. Navigate Homes proposes that the property be rezoned from Interim Development -Research Park (ID -RP) to Low Density Mufti -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12). Although Navigate Homes is the applicant, the property is owned by IC Gove East LLC. The application doesn't indicate a business relationship between Navigate Homes and IC Grove. We urge the City Council to deny the rezoning application. The proposed development will harm the environment, the Camp Cardinal Creek watershed, property owned by our homeowners' association adjacent to the proposed development, and our property. Those of us who live within 200 feet of the property to be rezoned will submit a protest of rezoning in accordance with the Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa and Chapter 14, Section 14-8D-5 of the Code of Iowa City. Since over 20 percent of the owners of property which is located within the 200 feet of the property to be rezoned will submit petitions in protest of the rezoning, three fourths of the City Council members must approve the rezoning request. Navigate Homes proposes to build a 30 -unit complex, 4 townhomes, and 22 duplexes across 25.02 acres of land. Four of the proposed duplexes will be built on the slope of a heavily wooded hill that rises above wetlands, environmentally sensitive areas, and Camp Cardinal Creek. To construct these four duplexes, Navigate Homes proposes to remove 40 -year-old majestic hardwood trees and will build retaining walls to prevent erosion. Navigate Homes proposes to access these duplexes with a narrow road north -south road that ends in a cul-de-sac on the north end of the property. Although the Department of Neighborhood and Development Services staff report recommended approval of the rezoning application, the staff report extensively referenced impacts on sensitive areas; "disturbed" woodlands and wetlands; and impacts on steep, critical and protected slopes. Even though the development's impact on wetlands, woodlands, and slopes would meet the minimum standards established by Iowa City's ordinance, the total negative impact of the development requires disapproval to conform with the spirit and intent of the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan and the Iowa City Zoning Code. The Comprehensive Plan's vision statement states the Iowa City will strive to protect and enhance the environment and encourage the responsible use of our natural and energy resources. The Comprehensive Plan further emphasizes that "Iowa City's vision for the future includes environmental protection as a basic tenet." The Comprehensive Plan states that any impacts on regulated features must be minimized. Section 14 -1A -3B-8 explains the Iowa City Zoning Code is intended to conserve open space and protect natural, scenic, and historic resources. Another reason to disapprove the rezoning application and development plan is that the proposed development violates the Comprehensive Plan's policy against cul-de-sacs and the standards limiting use of cul-de-sacs specified in Section 15-3-2A-4 of the Iowa City Code. Page 5 of the staff report notes that the Comprehensive Plan discourages cul-de-sacs and emphasizes stub streets for future connectivity. Section 15-3-2A-4 states that cul-de-sacs should be avoided, and cul-de-sacs will be considered where there are environmental constraints. The staff report notes that the proposed development is limited due to sensitive areas and existing neighborhood constraints. The staff report then states that due to environmental constraints the staff supports a cul-de-sac design rather than a loop street. This doesn't make sense. The cul-de-sac will cause environmental damage that Iowa City is trying to prevent. The cul-de-sac enables construction around it that harms woodlands, wetlands, and slopes. If the north - south road is shortened 100 yards at the north end of the development and the cul-de-sac is moved 100 yards south, woodlands and wetlands will be preserved and there will not be slope -side development threatening the Camp Cardinal Creek watershed. Although we urge the City Council to deny Navigate Homes' rezoning application, we would not object to a new rezoning request that includes an amended proposed development. The amended proposed development would shorten the north -south road 100 yards at the north end of the development and would propose construction of 18 duplexes rather 22 duplexes. The amended development would be a win-win for the developer, the environment, and our neighborhood. It recognizes IC Grove East LLC's property rights while preserving the environment and the character of our neighborhood. We appreciate the City Council's leadership in making Iowa City a great place to live and work. Sincerely, 6141 /4)04L--01. ., gyati Cfi .%•<fq C4- 01171 /fabr5wg-;z- �ti Afai/k i/vti7d?ca .011 Rya 12 ct _ v (6OttD(Oil) 814 Plata' .=r/LI/L, g Li P--k_r emk,) Mary NedcL4e' LAbce(-47(;('-\- CA ly .80), k1/401\ Or: C.JA-y Ai l an t l,7 a TA - Jo c CAr‘AIA s -b KLx' Se›,1/4, w 5.22 r-Ru\N4C71-. l -C 8'6,5 a Ci• A 5224/6 R&rj el— Robin M4 4 cthavi 8173 / -0v Y‘ HE-WI/a 4 ry 111 qi 8'22 q4 Foy 1?,,i a wa 52 y August 31, 2022 862 Ryan Ct Iowa City, IA 52246 Ms. Kellie Fruehling City Clerk City of Iowa City 410 E. Washington St Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Ms. Fruehling: 3 My neighbors and I who are homeowners and residents on Ryan Ct in Iowa City are protesting the proposed rezoning of property south of us and east of Camp Cardinal Blvd. Navigate Homes is the applicant. I enclosed nine protest forms my neighbors and I signed before notaries. I also included a letter signed by nearly everyone in our neighborhood explaining why we oppose the rezoning. Nine of the fourteen homeowners located within 200 feet of the proposed rezoning signed protest forms opposing the rezoning. Five homeowners could not sign the protest form because they are either temporarily out of the state or unable to travel to a notary. Three of the five signed the letter explaining our opposition to the rezoning. Please present the protest forms and our letter to the City Council for their consideration during the rezoning process. We appreciate your assistance. I can be reached at (202) 271- 8950 and ewinbornaol.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Erik Winb rn AJL Enclosures (10) Protest forms (9) Letter to City Council (1) PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA • CITY OilOIVA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: ectsi-0 Coomp C41-6,1 na C3 ‘41 eua_ onlancktis-t. of CarApCxtricen PaLtd(FlArce1ti Lib lacl? TcLo C.20 -y Asses This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: iP7.- Propert mer(s): Le.; e_K By: By: cr INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: ps4 instrument was acknowledged before m 3 be on (Date) by r)d-v 2-S_ _ and _rCIL_C.. t.-111.___42.S.1,04.4.narne(s) af individual property ownet(s)). AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): 0.,CAROL LYNN RAYMER 0 Commission Number 822821 z ,' My cpmmission Expires )0,0. 1 ("-- STA I E OF IOWA. ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner). Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Ong: Subd Folder Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File 02/2013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA .•. __ CITY OF IOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: primeriy C>ustr GavnpCcultinaI (3 "IeOft rdanCkLLeSiafCar9pCixrdisert1 RaCafekralite I 1a, 40Iac3`8 0u0o 641/ Assessor-. This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not becorne effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. { A I t Property Address: � 1 -J 1 A Prop v O� er(s): By: LA By: y [ INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instgument vas acknowledged before me on 1�t and to vidual e),r,orz2 41,b)r JENNIFER P LEE .S Notarial Sohl - IOWA CorAmiSSIOD iNlo.7713 32 ?Ay Cornmiss'son Expires January 29, 2 iv'o blic or a State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: (Date) by (narne(s) of This instrurnent was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA- PCD - Council - Media File 0212013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OF IOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: Pimp€ r+y eas-tt Gakrn p Cc rzl i na 1 e a ui eua rdancklLesi of CarypCitrtflen I Pactcla=tkrce I# 11 /a `-01 ao V 3bLda a+y Assessor This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: ea Li 12. Property Owner(s): l rte `L By: By: te el 5:P.OM e�dli Il\TDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This `owledged before me on 7/ k �'F/ A(5 d individual property owner(s))- LG [ 22- (Date) by (name(s) of Notary Publi �?4-/LA_ in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name s) ofperson s)) as +flu t ■ i/vca bl� 'T11116f Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File name of ‘r Commission Number WOOTONN 796078 .o*a M �j mm" n (Date)by (add- 4.• /' ' (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of erty owner) . Notary Public in an for the State of Iowa SHEILA WOOTONN mmr Com fission Number 796078 rtO .jr- A 02/2013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OF IOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: grope.r+y Eat_sttf Camp Cart%inal RAuieva.r+sialickt . 61 ofCavflpCnrtflvn 1 frcei# 111•& 001? 3o�.da c.. 4 y Ass This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa Property Address: Property Owner(s): By: lam- !<e, By: .1.A4� r 8" Y2 j ya{t cd', Tow, cry (n v� 1G. C1,9 ar r)--• An -01 Ga (e tr. 1,14i, b G+ INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on k/Sv ,'SC)`±/ f Z Z and U* D g-01/0-11- individual -01r0 individual propowner(s)). �.p+ AVERY POWERS 2° - Commission Number 839576 • M • mmiss on • fires - nt •ii! . AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROP STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: Iowa .,RTY OWNER(S): (Date) by (name(s) of This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File 02:2013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA :�— CITY OF IOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: prc €r -+y eastoFCamp Ccu inaI 63aUIevctnflandlLestofCar9PC.tallyn1 Qactd(Rkrce1# 11a.' O1608 3o�da CGi-y Assessor This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa Property Address: S 4 1236 14 Cry /1;7 2 Property Owner(s): 5 t P h e +'' By: By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): C -) STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: / This ins w ac owledged before me on 1 &Q! Oaz_(Date) by � (name(s) of indiatSal property owner(s)). and Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): 4lu�s� DEVIN BUSH r Commission Number 841419 My Commission Expires STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File 0212013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: p;rcee.r+y ecstofCamp Cetrairia1 Rouletktrdoridl siofCar9pC'Ord+vxt1 Pacbrialkrcelti111a5Fo1aog SoLda G+y Assessor, Thisctive except by o abl protestvis of at three-fourths e fo rths of with the members of thate counuch cil, all in accordance with Sning shall not become efction 414 5 ofthe the favorable vote of at Code of Iowa. �7 Property Address: 1C \+ ar\ Propert wner(s): Cl�.Vraer---a-r-14110,-10r6 ML V By: _-;;%1==- By: INDIVIDUAL ROPER OWNER(S): CITY OF IOWA CITY STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This imtrument was acknowledged before me on l�a�v t A e.) 4- r _ and individual property owner(s)). 3 f - 0.20 a (Date) b ❑.e b r.% A e } k-: -_ (name(s) of Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File - 3 1- a da a (Date) by (type of authority, such as e of property owner) . 1� J . 1 f—' icer, trust It Not ublic in and for the State of Iowa JAMES A LYNCH Comrr fission Number 831271 • ' My Expires 0212013 PROTEST OF REZONING • x TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITYOFIOWR CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: prcxr+y eccs* Gannp Carib i na I Q o uieVct rzlar,cll.ck.si of Car9pCard ha 1 Pry td(pa rce ltt 111a ooh , Iouoa 6+y Assessor-. This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at Ieast three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa P l Property Address: 8 ` �'�'I '�J ! thit � j Jt ..s. --.2c/6 - "�. �M ot � Property Owpea(s): .b4�N 4 / l By: f'' i f By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: Thitr unent was acknowledged before me on �Oh na 1q tt OA,e and individual property owner(s))• blit int V or the/ e of lows AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: ow STACIE S BEDFORD Commission Number 006031 ' My Commission Expires August 29, 2023 This instrument was acknowledged before me on (type of authDate ) ry, such as officer, trustee) of (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (name of property owner) Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig. Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File 022013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA - CITY OF IOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: pr'cper+y easttk Camp Carmina l 3 DIeuccrrlandll�siofCars pCartilsVxt l ►2aad(Fkrrel#' U Q.4o la0V 3o�da (24y Assessor This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. ^� Property Address: 6-6° `2- i' �" J 6 7 "j� 4IeR CU �.JL,4 6 22 y }� ): ,r'i 1C' if / c hJOQ Y'24 Property Ow By: % By: ��4'/t -a-► aghteer-A • i / r - Crco/ G J(kl1 o ii INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on ' atA- a, lL W VAN° by N _ and _ C0...r o\ w \vtb b( Y\ individual property owner(s)). 1111.A/� t0(4 - Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Et1A1. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S) STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: (Date) by'. (name(s) of ' =` DIXIE ABBOTT s. Commission Number 755982 dire r• My Commission Expires November 26, 2023 IOWA This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name(s) ofperson(s)) as Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa 0212013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA • CITY OF IOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: Pryr+y EastoCam pCarel inaIG3oule etrcionc‘lAsiofCar9pCaalien I Pacta(FtkrzelttII!a,Lio1008 .3oLdd CA -41 Assesso)-, This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: l9! 4 Own 59 Propertys): /c/ _AP/ 5 By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument wa acknowledged before me on tgtd L 't)r c3 and individual property owner s)). yP Lt SA CAROL LYNN RAYMER 1 g . Commission Number 822821 My Commission FXidres StL (91) Z�2� 1 (Date) by ' ) v n} (name(s) of Notary ' blic ' i ', d for the State • Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa 02/2013 I ae. 1 1 tl1 1 1 I I 1 1 I tllYltlWd1 I1IM1IllIIII1l IV Doc ID: 031975640007 Type GEN Kind: ORDINANCE Recorded: 10/11/2022 at 02:28:56 PTI Fee Amt: $37.00 Page 1 of 7 Johnson County Iowa Kim Painterr} CountyRecorder BK6432 PG616-622 STATE OF IOWA ) SS JOHNSON COUNTY j � 1 - City +off 04A I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Ordinance attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. 22-4888 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the 3rd day of October 2022 is a true and correct copy, all. as the same appears of record in my office. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this 7day of October 2022. Kellie K. Fruehling 1 City Clerk lord 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 • (319) 356-5000 • FAX (319) 356-5009 Prepared by: Esther Tetteh, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; (REZ22-0001) 22-4888 Ordinance No. An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 27.68 acres of property located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Rd from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) Zone to Low Density Multifamily Residential Zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) (REZ22-0001). Whereas, IC Grove East, LLC, and Navigate Homes Iowa, LLC, have requested a rezoning of property located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Rd. from Interim Development - Research Park (ID -RP) to Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12); and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the subject area is appropriate for residential development at a density of 8-16 dwelling units per acre; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages a mix of housing types within each neighborhood to provide options for households of all types and people of all incomes; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages pedestrian -oriented development and attractive and functional streetscapes that make it safe, convenient, and comfortable to walk; and Whereas, the rezoning creates a public need for construction of Camp Cardinal Rd to provide a secondary access and additional traffic calming devices at the intersection of Deer Creek Rd and Camp Cardinal Rd to provide the safe street network envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding construction of Camp Cardinal Rd and a traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Rd and Camp Cardinal Rd, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner, IC Grove East LLC, and the applicants have agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby classified Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12), as indicated: AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2011054, A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT OF Ordinance No. 22 48,843 Page 2 SURVEY RECORDED IN BOOK 56, PAGE 37, PLAT RECORDS OF JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA: Section 11. Zoning Map. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification and Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and any agreements or other documentation authorized and required by the Conditional Zoning Agreement, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication in accordance with Iowa Code Chapter 380. Passed and approved this 3rd. day of October , 2022. Attest: t Gity CIerk Approved by City Attorne s Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen — 08/30/2022) Ordinance No. 22-4888 Page 2 It was moved by Thomas and seconded by Bergus the Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: x x x ABSENT: First Consideration 09/06/2022 Vete for passage: NAYS: Taylor Second Consideration Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner that AYES: Alter, Bergus, Harmsen, Teague, Thomas, Weiner ABSENT: None 09/20/2022 Vote for passage: NAYS: Taylor Date published AYES: Alter, Bergus, Harmsen, Teague, Thomas, Weiner ABSENT: None Prepared by: Esther Tetteh, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (REZ22-0001) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made among the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), IC Grove East, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and Navigate Homes Iowa, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 27.68 acres of property located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Rd., legally described below; and Whereas, the Applicant has requested the rezoning of said property legally described below from Interim Development — Research Park (ID -RP) to Low Density Multifamily -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the subject area is appropriate for residential development at a density of 8-16 dwelling units per acre; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages a mix of housing types within each neighborhood to provide options for households of all types and people of all incomes; and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan encourages pedestrian -oriented development and attractive and functional streetscapes that make it safe, convenient, and comfortable to walk; and Whereas, the rezoning creates a public need for construction of Camp Cardinal Rd to provide a secondary access to the development; and Whereas, the rezoning creates a public need for additional traffic calming devices at the intersection of Deer Creek Rd and Camp Cardinal Rd to provide the safe street network envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding contributing to the cost of developing Camp Cardinal Rd to urban design standards and also contributing to the cost of constructing a traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Rd and Camp Cardinal Rd, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner and Applicant agree to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. IC Grove East LLC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as: 1 AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2011054, A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER AND PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST OF THE 5T" RM., IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT OF SURVEY RECORDED IN BOOK 56, PAGE 37, PLAT RECORDS OF JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. 2. Owner and Applicant acknowledge that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2021) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner and Applicant agree that development of the subject property will conform to all requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards in accordance with Iowa City Code of Ordinances 15-3-2. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road 4. The conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2021), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released by the City of Iowa City. Once a building permit is issued, the conditions shall be deemed satisfied and no further release of this agreement will be provided. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. In the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all development will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. Nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this (9 day of 1jL'11S7 , 2022. City of Iowa City e Teague, Moor 2 IC Grove Eat, LC y: DWI,7I.•©yter ) M _aje,' 9 .e L- Cr Kellie ruehling, Ci Ierk Approved by: City Attorney's Office Navigate Homes Iowa, LLC By: Da tri rhaitafer City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of Iowa ) ) ss: Johnson County ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on / C' • a- , 2022 by Bruce Teague and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, res ectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the S of Iowa IC Grove East, LLC Acknowledgement: State of County of ohviso,i This record was acknowledged before uviol L- O>f ler (name) as s SUSAN J WEAVER Commission Number 794422 My Commission Expires (Stamp or Seal) TAMARA NEUMANN Commission Number 539055 COMMISSION ISSION E7(PIRES MARCH 14, 2025 e on 41,L,qUf I6 , 2022 by (title) IC Grove East, LLC. otary Public in fid for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: Z' 6.2025 Navigate Homes Iowa, LLC Acknowledgment: State of County of D–oh v . rsn This record was acknowledged before me onA/W(54 Is" , 2022 by nAvol L. (name) as J - (title) of Navigate Homes Iowa, LLC. A. 'RtAt SUSAN J WEAVER a g. ComiiissidhNumber 794422 a b, mySornrriSs,on Expires - .zz Ddotary Public in a •' or the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: 2' S. 2-0ZS- 3 Item Number: 11. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !kr4gi,'��� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 3, 2022 Ordinance amending Title 9, entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic," Chapter 3, entitled "Rules of the Road," Section 6, entitled "Speed Restrictions," Subsection B, entitled "Exceptions," to eliminate the 35 MPH speed zone for American Legion Road. (Second Consideration) Prepared By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Reviewed By: Kent Ralston, Transportation Planner Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: American Legion Road Speed Zone Ordinance Executive Summary: An existing 35 mph speed zone currently extends from Buckingham Lane east to City Limits at Taft Avenue. With the 2nd phase of the American Legion Road Reconstruction Project nearing completion, and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and the design speed of the new road segment, the speed limit east of Buckingham Lane should be reduced from 35 mph to 25 mph. Background /Analysis: The proposed speed limit change was determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, which considered the design of the reconstructed roadway, adjacent land uses, and State Code. During the design of the American Legion Road Reconstruction Project, design elements were incorporated into the project to convert the roadway from a rural to an urban cross-section. Elements including narrow travel lanes, on -street buffered bicycle lanes, and sidewalks are intended to make the corridor more conducive to multimodal travel, which was identified as a priority for the reconstructed corridor. The design speed was therefore set at 25 mph. Residential development has recently increased on property immediately adjacent to the roadway corridor, and the section qualifies as a residence district as defined by the State code. Based on that designation, the speed limit shall be 25 mph according to State Code. The speed limit on the 1st phase of the reconstruction project generally between Scott Boulevard and Buckingham Lane was lowered to 25 mph last year. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Acting Traffic Eng. Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5239 Ordinance No. 22-4889 Ordinance amending Title 9, entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic," Chapter 3, entitled "Rules of the Road," Section 6, entitled "Speed Restrictions," Subsection B, entitled "Exceptions," to eliminate the 35 MPH speed zone for American Legion Road. Whereas, it is in the best interest of the City to define maximum allowable speeds for vehicles on public streets and highways; Whereas the current 35 MPH speed zone extends from Buckingham Lane and continues east to Taft Avenue; and Whereas, in conjunction with the reconstruction of the portion of American Legion Road, between Buckingham Lane and Taft Avenue, and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation and the design speed of the new road segment, the 35 mph speed limit exception should be eliminated and the speed limit east of Buckingham Lane should be reduced to 25 MPH. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I. Amendment 1. Title 9, entitled "Motor Vehicles and Traffic," Chapter 3, entitled "Rules of the Road," Section 6, entitled "Speed Restrictions," Sub -Section B, entitled "Exceptions," is hereby amended as follows: Name of Street Where 35 MPH Limit Applies American Legion Read Section II. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective upon publication. Passed and approved this 3rd day of October , 2022. Page 1 of 2 Ordinance No. 22-4889 Page 2 It was moved byWeiner and seconded by Taylor the Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: X Alter x Bergus x Harmsen x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner that First Consideration 09/20/2022 Voteforpassage: AYES: Alter, Bergus, Harmsen, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner NAYS: None ABSENT: None Second Consideration Vote for passage: Date published 10/11/7077 Moved by Weiner, seconded by Taylor, that the rule requiring ordinance to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Alter, Bergus, Harmsen, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Weiner NAYS: None ABSENT: None S'7AA-4-1-- Mayor Attest: k_ AA-z-- Mayor -L Approved by J City Attorr'y's Office (Liz Craig — 09/14/2022) Page 2 of 2