Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-01-10 Resolution
Item Number: 5.d. CITY of IOWA CITY www.icgov.org January 10, 2023 1. Resolution to issue Hwy. 1 West. 2. Resolution to issue 220 E. Washington Cigarette Permit to Crown Retail LLC, dba The Crown Liquor and Smoke, 19 Cigarette Permit to Iowa Smoke Time LLC, dba Iowa Smoke Time Vapor Shop, St. ATTACHMENTS: Description Cigarette Resolution S.� Prepared by: City Clerk's Office, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5043 Resolution Number: 23 02 Resolution to Issue Cigarette Permits Whereas, the following firms and persons have made an application and paid the taxes required by law for the sale of cigarettes, tobacco, nicotine and vapor products. Now, Therefore, be it Resolved by The City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, That: the applications be granted and the City Clerk is hereby directed to issue a permit to the following named persons and firms to sell cigarettes, tobacco, nicotine and vapor products: The Crown Liquor and Smoke — 19 Hwy 1 W. Iowa Smoke Time Vapor Shop - 220 E. Washington St. a _January__ Passed and approved this loth day of - , 20 23 ayor Approved by City Attorney's Office It was moved by Dunn and seconded by Bergus Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Nays: Ayes: x x x x x x x Absent: Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague Thomas Dunn the Item Number: 6.b. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution authorizing the procurement of tire derived aggregate for the Landfill CeII FY23 Project. Prepared By: Joe Welter, Senior Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: Estimated $403,636, available in the Future Landfill CeII Project, Account # L3338 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Sole Source Documentation Resolution Executive Summary: This item awards the contract for procurement of tire derived aggregate (TDA), which is needed for the construction of certain parts of the new landfill cell, CeII FY23. These materials are only available from one manufacturer in the State of Iowa, Liberty Tire Recycling, LLC of Des Moines, Iowa. Hence, this procurement is a sole source request, which requires Council approval due to the total cost of the contract. Staff recommends awarding this contract for to Liberty Tire Recycling, LLC of Des Moines, Iowa. Background /Analysis: The current landfill cell, CeII FY18, is nearing the end of its usable space. To continue solid waste disposal services at the Landfill, the City must construct a new landfill cell. The next cell, CeII FY23, has been designed and approved to construct by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Construction and initial fill for the new cell are planned for 2023. The new cell is 11.1 acres and is estimated to last nine to eleven years. Construction next year will allow transition of the solid waste disposal in the new cell roughly in the same time frame as completion of filling in the current cell. The design of the new landfill cell includes the installation TDA as a drainage layer, similar to past what was installed in some of the previous cells. Due to the size of the new cell, a large quantity of TDA is required for the project. With a single supplier, the TDA needed for construction of the new cell must be stockpiled in advance of construction due to limited capacity and availability of processing, shipment, and handling of the materials by the only supplier. In order to have enough time for the vendor to grind the needed quantity, the procurement of the TDA needs to begin prior to the start of the landfill cell construction project. The vendor will arrange hauling and the TDA will be stockpiled at the Iowa City Landfill's northwest storage area until it is ready to be used for the Landfill Cell FY23 Project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Sole Source Documentation Resolution Sole Source Procurement Request. CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE Form Submitter Employee ID 41335 Name JENNIFER JORDAN Email JeJordan@i owa-city. org Application Information Department* Public Works Department Head* Ron Knoche Product/Service Requested* Tire derived aggregate Estimated amount of this purchase* $ 403,636.00 Does this purchase involve any computer hardware and/or software?* Yes • No Contract Period Start Date End Date 12/5/2022 10/31/2023 Internal Contact Person Name Jennifer Jordan Department Public Works Phone 3198876160 Email jejordan@iowa-city.org Due Dates Date Location Work must be completed by 9/29/2023 Material/Equipment/Supplies must be delivered by 9/30/2023 Service must begin by 12/15/2022 Iowa City Landfill, northwest storage area Iowa City Landfill, northwest storage area Iowa City Landfill, northwest storage area Documentation Provide a detailed explanation of the item or service requested.* Approximately 11,600 tons of TIRE DERIVED AGGREGATE (TDA) is needed to line the side banks and other select areas (over the leachate lines) of the new FY23 landfill cell on which we will begin construction in spring 2023 (construction bid opening is 11-29-22). In order to have enough time for the vendor to grind the needed quantity, the purchase needs to be made prior to the start of construction. The vendor will arrange hauling and the TDA will be stockpiled at the Iowa City Landfill's northwest storage area. Detailed specifications are below: 2.1 TIRE DERIVED AGGREGATE (TDA) A. TDA shall be made from scrap passenger car tires only. Truck tires and Tractor tires are not permitted. Rubber products such as conveyor belts and inner tubes shall not be used. B. The material shall be free of bead wire. Supplier shall utilized a magnet or other approved method during shredding and screening to removed bead wire from the TDA. C. TDA shall be free of any contaminants such as oils or greases. D. Gradation shall be 2-inch nominal meeting the following specifications: 1. Maximum dimension in any directions shall be 4-inches. 2. Nominally 2-inches and may range from '% inch to 4-inches. 3. Free of any wire protruding more than '/2 inch. 4. Maximum of 1 percent (by weight) of fines and crumb rubber < 2 mm. E. TDA shall be free from loose bead wire or body wires that may cause damage to the liner system geosynthetics. F. TDA shall not be derived from tires that had been previously exposed to fire. Explain why the product/service requested is the only product/service that can satisfy your requirements and explain why alternatives are unacceptable. Be specific with regard to specifications, features, characteristics, requirements, capabilities and compatibility. Describe what steps have been undertaken to make this determ ination. * As far as landfill staff, our engineering consultant on this project SCS Engineers (SCS) and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) are aware, Liberty Tire Recycling is the only tire processor in the Midwest. Their TDA meets the specifications required by the IDNR for new landfill cell construction drainage layers. Explain why this service provider, supplier, or manufacturer is the only practicably available source from which to obtain this product or service and describe the efforts that were made to verify and confirm whether, or not, this is so.* As far as landfill staff SCS and IDNR are aware, Liberty Tire Recycling is the only tire processor in the Midwest. SCS works with multiple landfills across the state and region and is not aware of other sources of TDA. Obtain and include a letter from the manufacturer confirming, claims made by distributors of exclusive distributorships for the product or service, if, that is cited as a reason for this Sole Source. Liberty Letter.doc.pdf 267.29KB Will this purchase obligate us to a particular vendor for future purchases?* Either in terms of maintenance that only this vendor will be able to perform and/or if we purchase this item, will we need more' like" items in the future to match this one? Maintenance is not an issue for TDA. Future TDA would need to be purchased from Liberty Tire Recycling, assuming they are the only vendor in the future. Explain why the price for this product or service is considered to be fair and reasonable.* There is not a cost for the product itself; the cost is for the transportation from Liberty Tire Recycling to the Iowa City Landfill's northwest storage area. Describe the negotiation efforts, if any, that have been made with the supplier to obtain the best possible price.* There is not a cost for the product itself; the cost is for the transportation. Liberty Tire Recycling needs to grind and haul well before the product is needed to ensure the Landfill has enough material in time for placement in spring/summer 2023. Liberty Tire Recycling does not have capacity to store the needed amount at their site so must grind and transport simultaneously. Explain the consequence(s) to the City or Public, including a dollar estimate of the financial impact, if this Sole Source is not approved. * Washed sand would need to be used for the entire drainage layer, including the side banks and over the leachate lines. The TDA is the best option for the side banks to prevent erosion/sluff on the side banks. Will your department require the purchase of this specific item or service in the future? If yes, provide a detailed explanation including the frequency of the purchase, quantities, and financial impact.* It is likely that TDA will continue to be used for side banks and select areas in future landfill cells. Costs will depend on the side of the constructed cell and the cost of fuel at the time. hereby request that a Sole Source be approved for the procurement of the above statement of work, material, equipment, commodity, or service. Please print your name below Jennifer L. Jordan Date 12/3/2022 Signatures Department Director ikedALP/27kdocoox I hereby approve the Sole Source request for the procurement of the product andlor service documented above for a period of five (5) years for so long as the Council -approved budget authorizes the expenditure Purchasing Agent t I hereby approve the Sole Source request for the procurement of the product and/or service documented above for a period of five (5) years for so long as the Council -approved budget authorizes the expenditure City Attorney I hereby approve the Sole Source request for the procurement of the product and/or service documented above for a period of five (5) years for so long as the Council -approved budget authorizes the expenditure Finance Director I hereby approve the Sole Source request for the procurement of the product and/or service documented above for a period of five (5) years for so long as the Council -approved budget authorizes the expenditure ITS Coordinator If Applicable, only required in event of software/hardware purchase. Sign I hereby approve the Sole Source request for the procurement of the product and/or service documented above for a period of five (5) years for so long as the Council -approved budget authorizes the expenditure City Manager Approval* Approve Deny City Managers Office* I hereby approve the Sole Source request for the procurement of the product and/or service documented above for a period of five (5) years for so long as the Council -approved budget authorizes the expenditure Prepared by: Joe Welter, Engineering Division, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 (319) 356-5144 Resolution No. 23-03 Resolution authorizing the procurement of tire derived aggregate for the Landfill Cell FY23 Project Whereas, an amount of tire derived aggregate (TDA) is needed for the construction of certain parts of the new landfill cell, Cell FY23; and Whereas, these materials are only available from one manufacturer in the State of Iowa, Liberty Tire Recycling, LLC of Des Moines, Iowa; and Whereas, Liberty Tire Recycling has advised the City that stockpiling of the material needs to happen in advance of construction of the cell to make sure an adequate amount is available; and Whereas, construction of the new cell is to start in spring 2023; and Whereas, the contract was established via a Sole Source Procurement Request for this material; and Whereas, at the time the contract was written the cost these materials was $403,636.00; and Whereas, the City's Purchasing Policy requires City Council approval for contracts over $150,000; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Future Landfill Cell Project, Account # L3338. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The proposed procurement as described is approved. 2. The City Manager is authorized to take whatever steps are necessary to effectuate the purchase including any amendments or renewals of said contract. Passed and approved this loth day of January , 2023 Approved by �: 4-C Attest . � -.0 City►Clerk ! City Attorn s ffice - 12/27/2022 • Resolution No. 23-03 Page 2 It was moved by Dunn and seconded by Bergus the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: X Alter X Bergus X Harmsen X Taylor X Teague X Thomas X ')Dunn Item Number: 6.c. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution accepting the work for the 2022 Water Pavement Patching Project. Prepared By: Marri VanDyke, Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: The project has been completed by Bockenstedt Excavation, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer's Report and Performance and Payment bonds are on file with the City Clerk. • Project Estimated Cost: • Project Bid Received: • Project Actual Cost: $ 175,000.00 $ 204,374.00 $ 300,790.80 Background /Analysis: Each year there are, on average, approximately 60 water main breaks within the City, and street and or sidewalk pavement typically needs to be removed and replaced in order to repair the water main. With limited resources and the emergency nature of the pavement repairs, the City combined the pavement repairs at multiple main break sites into a single project to more efficiently address pavement damage resulting from water main breaks throughout the year. The original contract included pavement repairs at twenty (20) locations: 708 Bayard Street 246 Lexington Avenue 131 Ferson Avenue 824 Ronalds Street 707 Oakcrest Street 327 West Burlington Street 1021 South Gilbert Court 728 Chestnut Court 2001 G Street 518 Meadow Street 2904 Cornell Avenue 1201 Wade Street 1345 East Davenport Street 117 Clapp Street 1112 Tower Court 1506 Crescent Street 1304 Kirkwood Avenue 614 Rundell Street 1208 Arthur Court 1208 Tyler Court Fourteen (14) locations were added to the project for a total of thirty-four (34) locations that received repairs. The added locations were: 230 South 7th Avenue 435 Lee Street 603 South 7th Avenue 1219 Marcy Street 1503 Sheridan Avenue ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Report Resolution 1812 B Street 1004 Tipperary Road 2263 Balsam Court 508 Summit Street 51 Rocky Shore Drive 730 East Jefferson Street 910 River Street 121 West Benton Street 1204 Ashley Drive ENGINEER'S REPORT December 22, 2022 City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa RE: 2022 Water Pavement Patching Project CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1826 (319) 356 - 5000 (319)356-5009FAX www.icgov.org Dear City Clerk: I hereby certify that the 2022 Water Pavement Patching Project has been completed by Bockenstedt Excavating, Inc., of Iowa City, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the City of Iowa City Engineering Division. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $300,790.80. There was a total of two (2) change orders for the project as described below: 01 Added flaggers, insulating blankets, and sanitary sewer $2,290.00 materials. 02 Quantity adjustments for added main break locations $94,126.80 TOTAL $96,416.80 I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, Jason Havel, P.E. City Engineer Prepared by: Marri VanDyke, Engineering Division, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5044 Resolution No. 23-04 Resolution accepting the work for the 2022 Water Pavement Patching Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the 2022 Water Pavement Patching Project, as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and Bockenstedt Excavating, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa, dated August 16, 2022, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineer's Report and the performance, payment and maintenance bond have been filed in the City Clerk's office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Water Divisions Operating Budget account #73730130; and Whereas, the final contract price is $300,790.80. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this 10th day of January Attest: ) ,C;() City Clerk J It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: x x x x and seconded by , 2023 Approved by City Attor -y's Office (Liz Craig — 01/05/2023) Bergus Nays: Absent: Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor x Teague x Tkcmas the Resolution be Item Number: 6.d. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution accepting the work for the Nevada Avenue Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Fiscal Impact: Recommendations: Attachments: Joe Welter, Senior Engineer Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager None Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: Construction of the Nevada Avenue Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project has been completed by B.G. Brecke, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the Project Manual developed by Anderson -Bogert Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The Engineer's Report and the Performance, Payment, and Maintenance Bond are on file in the City Clerk's Office. • Project Estimated Cost: • Project Bid Received: • Project Actual Cost: $ 462,000.00 $ 503,234.43 $ 519,771.60 Background /Analysis: This project replaced the sanitary sewer along the back yards of the residential properties between Nevada Avenue and Regal Lane from Lakeside Drive to Whispering Meadow Drive. The new sewer main consisted of 930 linear feet of new ten -inch pipe and four new sanitary manholes. Sanitary sewer services were reconstructed within the easements. The areas excavated for installation were restored with pavement or seeding. Fences were restored to the edge of permanent utility easements, which provides a twenty -foot wide grassed corridor for future maintenance or repair activities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Report Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT December 19, 2022 City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa Re: Nevada Avenue Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1826 (319) 356 - 5000 (319) 356 - 5009 FAX www.icgov.org Dear City Clerk: I hereby certify that the Nevada Avenue Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project has been completed by B.G. Brecke, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the Project Manual developed by the Anderson -Bogert Engineers & Surveyors, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $519,771.60. There were three (3) change orders on this project as follows: 1. Extra Shoring and Bracing — $9,500.00 2. Temporary Seeding for Summer Stabilization — $6,025.00 3. Adjustment for Final Quantities — $1,012.12 Total Cost Difference for Change Orders was $16,537.12 I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, ‘Le Jason Havel, PE City Engineer Prepared by: Joe Welter, Engineering Division, Public Works, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 (319) 356-5144 Resolution No. 23-05 Resolution accepting the work for the Nevada Avenue Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the Nevada Avenue Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project, as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and B.G. Brecke, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, dated October 28, 2021, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineer's Report and the performance, payment and maintenance bond have been filed in the City Clerk's office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Nevada Avenue Sanitary Sewer Replacement, Account Number V3147; and Whereas, the final contract price is $519,771.60. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this 10th day of January , 2023 Attest: It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: x x x x x May Approved by City Attor y's Office (Liz Craig — 12/27/2022) and seconded by Bergus Nays: Absent: Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague X Thomas X Dunn the Resolution be Item Number: 6.e. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution accepting the work for the Pedestrian Mall Playground Project. Prepared By: Marri VanDyke, Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Juli Seydell Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: The project has been completed by Woodruff Construction, Inc. of Tiffin, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer's Report and Performance and Payment bonds are on file with the City Clerk. • Project Estimated Cost: • Project Bid Received: • Project Actual Cost: $ 234,000.00 $ 227,250.00 $ 228, 790.52 Background /Analysis: The Ped Mall playground was nearing the end of its useful life, and discontinued replacement parts were making component repairs and replacements difficult. The City of Iowa City hired a consultant to develop plans for the new playground based on feedback from a public input survey and from a steering committee made up of City staff and representatives of the Iowa City Downtown District. Purchase of the playground equipment and shade structures by the City was approved at the November 16, 2021 Council meeting. Following a competitive bidding process, the City then hired Woodruff Construction to remove the old playground and install the new play equipment, surfacing, and large shade structures. ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Report Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT December21, 2022 City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa RE: Pedestrian Mall Playground Projec CITY OF IOWA CITY 4'10 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1826 (319) 356 - 5000 (319) 356 - 5009 FAX www.iegov.org Dear City Clerk: I hereby certify that the Pedestrian Mall Playground Project has been completed by Woodruff Construction, Inc., of Tiffin, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by Confluence, Inc. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $228,790.52. There was a total of one (1) change order for the project as described below: 01 Replace black dowel rebar with epoxy coated rebar. $1,540.52 I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, Jason Havel, P.E. City Engineer Prepared by: Marri VanDyke, Engineering Division, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5044 Resolution No. 23-06 Resolution accepting the work for the Pedestrian Mall Playground Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the Pedestrian Mall Playground Project, as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and Woodruff Construction, Inc. of Tiffin, Iowa, dated May 19, 2022, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineer's Report and the performance, payment and maintenance bond have been filed in the City Clerk's office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Pedestrian Mall Playground account #R4383; and Whereas, the final contract price is $228,790.52 Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this loth Attest: • ". , 2 1J- Cit Clerk It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: day of January , 2023 Approved by City Attorr y's Office (Liz Craig - 12/27/2022) and seconded by Bergus Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Alter x Bergus Harmsen x x x x x Taylor Teague Thomas Dunn the Resolution be Item Number: 6.f. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution accepting the work for the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project. Prepared By: Melissa Clow, Special Projects Administrator Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: The Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project has been completed by Portzen Construction, Inc. of Dubuque, Iowa in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by Origin Design, formerly I I W, P.C. The Engineer's Report has been filed in the City Clerk's office. • Project Estimated Cost: $ 1,370,000.00 • Project Bid Received: $ 1,398,708.11 • Project Actual Cost: $ 1,467,136.97 Background /Analysis: The 2015 Biennial Bridge Inspection Program reported that the Prentiss Street Bridge over Ralston Creek was suffering from bulging and severe corrosion of the corrugated metal pipe culverts, damaged and undermined inlet and headwall, and cracked street pavement. Pavement replacement in the area uncovered significant voiding under the pavement, further emphasizing the need for the project. The bridge had been limited to a 20-ton weight embargo due to its previous condition. In addition, the existing storm sewer along Prentiss Street, from Ralston Creek to S. Dubuque Street was undersized and had a history of surcharging during large rain events. ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Report Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT December 19, 2022 City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa Re: Prentiss Street Bridge Reconstruction Project CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1 S26 (319) 356 - 5000 (319) 356 - 5009 FAX www.icgov.org Dear City Clerk: I hereby certify that the construction of the Prentiss Street Bridge Reconstruction Project has been completed by Portzen Construction, Inc. of Dubuque, Iowa in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by Origin Design, formerly IIW, P.C. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $1,467,136.97. There were twelve (12) change orders for the project described below: 1. Increase RCB top slab reinforcing $417.52 2. Excavation for Structures, Unsuitable Soil, and Granular Backfill $17,848.84 3. South Apron, Top Reinforcement Plan, and 5f8 Longitudinal Bar $174.08 4. North Apron, Top Reinforcement Plan, Sanitary Sewer Service $38,570.03 Replacement, Culvert Rebar Spacing Corrections, and Special Water Main Gaskets 5. 8" Valve Replacement, C-mix in lieu of 0-mix, and 72" Storm Manhole $8,616.52 Replacement 6. Additional Linn Street Removals and Minor Intake Adjustments $1,500.00 7. Service Adjustments, Wetland Seeding and Temporary Stabilization $5,930,72 8, Storm Sewer — 24" RCP to DIP $3,244.78 9. PCC Cold Weather Protection, RCB Wing Wall Joint Sealing $2,664.53 10. Curb Repairs from Winter Maintenance and Parking Lot Restoration $3,075.00 11. Additional sodding for erosion control stabilization $3,840.50 12. Balance of Item Quantities -17,453.66 I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Jason Havel, P.E. City Engineer Prepared by: Melissa Clow, Engineering Division, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5413 Resolution No. 23-07 Resolution accepting the work for the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the Prentiss Street Bridge Replacement Project, as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and Portzen Construction, Inc. of Dubuque, Iowa, dated May 5th, 2020, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineer's Report has been filed in the City Clerk's office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Prentiss Street Bridge account # S3935; and Whereas, the final contract price is $1,467,136.97. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this 10th day of January , 2023 Attest: It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: x x x x r, Approved by City Atti ney's Office (Liz Craig - 12/27/2022) and seconded by Bergus Nays: Absent: Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague Thomas Dunn the Resolution be Item Number: 6.g. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution accepting the work for the Scott Boulevard Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Project. Prepared By: Scott Sovers, Asst. City Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: Work on the project was recently completed by Dave Schmitt Construction, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer's Report and Performance and Payment bonds are on file with the City Clerk. • Project Estimated Cost: $ 1,660,000.00 • Project Bid Received: $ 1,451,312.36 • Project Actual Cost: $ 1,475,085.46 Background /Analysis: This project generally included the extension of a 24-inch sanitary sewer from the Iowa Interstate Railroad northward along the North Branch of Snyder Creek to American Legion Road. ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Report Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT December 16, 2022 City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa Re: Scott Boulevard Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Project Dear City Clerk: CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington. Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1826 (319) 356 - 5000 (3I9) 356 - 5009 FAX www.icgov.org I hereby certify that the construction of the Scott Boulevard Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Project has been completed by Dave Schmitt Construction, Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by Stanley Consultants Inc. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $ 1,475,085,46. There were four (4) change or extra work orders for the project as described below: Change Order Description 1. Additional tree removals 2. Sunrise Village storm sewer 3. Field tile replacement and chain link gate 4. Sanitary sewer testing (to be completed 2 to 3 months before the expiration of the maintenance bond) TOTAL Net Contract Change $2,750.00 $3,364.52 $8,345.35 No Cost $14,459.87 I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, .12 Jason Havel, P.E. City Engineer Prepared by: Scott Sovers, Asst. City Engineer, Engineering Division, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319) 356-5142 Resolution No. 23-08 Resolution accepting the work for the Scott Boulevard Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the Scott Boulevard Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Project, as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and Dave Schmitt Construction Inc. of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, dated March 5th, 2021, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineer's Report and the performance, payment and maintenance bond have been filed in the City Clerk's office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Scott Boulevard Trunk Sewer account # V3145; and Whereas, the final contract price is $1,475,085.46. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this loth Attest: It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X x x x x day of January , 2023 +tic-L---- ¢o. or Approved by J City Attor/ey's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen - 12/27/2022) and seconded by Bergus Nays: Absent: Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague x Thomas x Dunn the Resolution be Item Number: 6.h. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution adopting the Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS) Standard Specifications (2023 Edition), as revised by the SUDAS General Supplemental Specifications, and the revised City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications (January 2023). Prepared By: Joe Welter, Senior Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item is an annual update of the specifications used for all public improvement projects and construction within the City of Iowa City Right -of -Way necessary and appropriate to respond to innovations and changes in construction technologies, methods, and materials. This update adopts the most recent SUDAS specifications manual along with the City's revisions for work locally within Iowa City. Background /Analysis: Council has adopted annual updates to the City's use of the SUDAS specifications manuals since it originally adopted the SUDAS specifications in 2018. SUDAS recently released the 2023 Edition of the standard Specifications. The City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications have been revised to reflect the 2023 Edition. The revised City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications have been placed on file with the City Engineer's Office, and will be made available for use in the construction of public improvements and construction within the public right-of-way within the City of Iowa City. The SUDAS specifications are available at iowasudas.org. Throughout the year, SUDAS General Supplemental Specifications may be approved by the SUDAS Board of Directors to address issues that arise. These General Supplemental Specifications will be reviewed and may be incorporated into City projects following SUDAS approval. Annually, SUDAS General Supplemental Specifications approved throughout the year are incorporated into the SUDAS Standard Specifications the following year. Staff will evaluate the SUDAS General Supplemental Specifications and the new editions of the SUDAS Standard Specifications at least annually to determine if revisions are needed to the City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by Joe Welter, Public Works, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240, (319) 356-5144 Resolution No. 23-09 Resolution adopting the Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS) Standard Specifications (2023 Edition), as revised by the SUDAS General Supplemental Specifications and the revised City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications (January 2023). Whereas, the City originally adopted the SUDAS Standard Specifications (2018 Edition), General Supplemental Specifications, and City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications in Resolution 18- 139 (May 15, 2018) for use in all public improvement projects and construction within the right-of- way; and Whereas, the SUDAS Board of Directors periodically approves general supplemental specifications, in response to innovations and changes in construction technologies, methods, and materials, which are then annually incorporated into its Standard Specifications; and Whereas, the City Staff similarly conducts an annual review of the Iowa City Supplemental Specifications in response to the revised SUDAS Standard Specifications; and Whereas, upon recommendation by Staff, City Council has annually adopted updates by resolution to its public improvement specifications, most recently with the approval of in Resolution 22-11 approved on January 18, 2022; and Whereas, the SUDAS Board of Directors recently released an updated 2023 Edition of the Standard Specifications; and Whereas, Staff has reviewed said 2023 Edition, and recommends that Council approve the same, along with revised City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications; and Whereas, it is in the best interests of the City to adopt said construction specifications. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The SUDAS Standard Specifications (2023 Edition), as may be periodically revised by the SUDAS Board of Directors through the approval of General Supplemental Specifications, and the City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications (January 2023) are hereby approved and shall be used for construction of all public improvements within the public right-of-way. 2. The City of Iowa City Supplemental Specifications shall be kept on file in the City Engineer's Office. The SUDAS Standard Specifications and any approved General Supplemental Specifications shall be available at iowasudas.org. 3. Resolution 22-11 is hereby rescinded. Passed and approved this 10th day of January 20 23 Resolution No. 23-09 Page 2 Attest: It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: Approved by • City Attorn's Office (Liz Craig - 01/05/2023) and seconded by Bergus Ayes: Nays: Absent: X Alter X Bergus Harmsen x Taylor Teague Thomas Dunn the Resolution be Item Number: 6.i. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution establishing the fee an owner may opt to pay in lieu of providing affordable housing in the Riverfront Crossings District and rescinding Resolution No. 20-230. Prepared By: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Fiscal Impact: No Impact Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Fee -in -Lieu Update Resolution Executive Summary: The Riverfront Crossings Affordable Housing Requirement set forth in Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-14 establishes an affordable housing requirement for certain projects, which may be met by providing on -site affordable housing or by providing a fee -in -lieu of contribution to an affordable housing fund. The fee must be determined biennially by City Council resolution. In September of 2020, the fee was set at $112,853 per unit. The fee for the next two years is proposed to be $70,291 per unit. Background /Analysis: In 2016, staff partnered with the National Development Council to formulate the methodology for calculating a fee -in -lieu that would be paid by developers in lieu of including affordable housing in Riverfront Crossing developments subject to the affordable housing requirement. It was determined that the most appropriate methodology for arriving at a fee -in -lieu was to compare the value of a market rate development to the value of a development subject to the Riverfront Crossings 10% affordable unit requirement. The difference between these values would be the fee -in -lieu since, under the ordinance, developers would be required to either provide the units on - site or pay the fee -in -lieu. This year staff reviewed the former methodology and updated the data using the current vacancy rate, capitalization rate (the rate of return on an investment property based on the income the property is expected to generate), and expense ratios. After updating the model based on recent data, the fee -in -lieu has been set at $70,291. While the input information was updated from 2020, no changes were made to the methodology. An increase to the capitalization rate, higher vacancy rate, and lower rents contributed to the decreased fee amount. Three different scenarios were reviewed using 40 units, 96 units, and 176 units as well as the updated numbers (attached). The highest value differential or fee -in -lieu of the three scenarios was selected. The fee -in -lieu option has been used for five projects to -date, totaling $3,803,275 for 36 units. ATTACHMENTS: Description Fee -in -Lieu Update Resolution r .ro O. C- O- .a a Y Y O O a V V O a L N 0 O C1 0 4- C =EL:E 0 • E E j O O U V 01 0 Q C C m O 7 C CC �j P O O N + T CC cc cc ro r6 .0' d d T y y c X G C C C "2 G u C. S.' w w C V 7 w w Q Q 01 v !D LC, m c-I N N m k.0 00 a N m m 00 00 CO 00 Cr Cr r N N N N N N 0 m m o m N N N co CO V N 0_ r0 E Z a° m 01 m o r1 ry ry w N a • w a a m rvi N m e e CO CO CO CO CO CO a-1 r eai Cr Cr eai N N N N N N • N 0 CO N rr1 O m c-I CO N e-1 cD 1, m N 01 0 0 O CO ea -I ii N 00 CO VD ,n O N c-I r1 r1 m � l CO N r e-1 O l0 i+l . z r, w m o rn 2 n o L m c-I c-I c-I N 1, N 01 N m 01 r N 01 a r1 r0 0 Value Differential/Fee in Lieu N 00 O ai 00 2 VI. 10% Affordable 0 DO NN m N m rn N ii J fJ LL Value Differential 10%Affordable Gross Rent oo n La a N oo c m 00 un N O u1 N m o Lr a ai o a a m M a M M Ln n co m o a1 2 N o 1 m ri ri ri imruuimr m 61 la N a OJ r, o coo ur al a N e {ems -1' C 4k �n a o N o N m m m o N m N i-W N N M a W N N M a rn o N M m o m a a o m rn m 61 a r a 0 00 N . LD 1, co N N O a u1 ,V} i!1• i!1• ,V} i!1• Income Approach to Value 96 Total Units Value Differential/Fee in Lieu N M co 0n 00 C 0n N vw 1, 1 co O co m N nai m M M Los a N. n N Differential Differential/Aff Unit c o o `a w o �n o a a N M O M M 5 lD lD N up 00 M N 00 00 u9 m 00 u9 c-1 G la N m m ' N 00 Le-,N ' a1 61 ni N N a1 1a o) N N N Ti, 00 0 up' 00 O O 6 N N 00 m 0 NW N Le -,I, O N Ln N co 601 co 0 a C-7 N N' . ti V1' .1 z v sh IA. tn. tn. m u m rn is N a OJ N N al O 00 Q d' la 00 61 a N O 2 n co M o Cr) n u_ n 00 0 ul m rn ri ri ri u-i V} in- in- m V} 3k 61 ul Cr)O N u1 10 10 Ln QU i-W N N M a W N N M a Gross Rent Income Approach to Value 176 Total Units Prepared by: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5230 Resolution No. 23-10 Resolution establishing the fee an owner may opt to pay in lieu of providing affordable housing in the Riverfront Crossings District and rescinding Resolution No. 20-230. Whereas, the Riverfront Crossings Affordable Housing Requirement set forth in Iowa City Code of Ordinances Section 14-2G-8 establishes an affordable housing requirement for certain projects, which may be met by providing on -site owner -occupied housing, on -site affordable rental housing, or by providing a fee in lieu contribution to an affordable housing fund to be established by the City; and Whereas, in accordance with Section 14-2G-8F, the in -lieu contribution per dwelling unit shall be determined biennially by resolution of the City Council based on a formula that analyzes the difference between renting a market rate unit and renting a dwelling unit affordable to an income -qualified household; and Whereas, with assistance from the National Development Council, staff has developed a formula that analyzes the difference in project value comparing a market -rate project to a project with a 10% affordability requirement, and used this formula to determine a per -unit fee developers may opt to pay in lieu of providing affordable housing dwelling units; and Whereas, the formula takes into account local market conditions such as rents, vacancy rate, capitalization rate, HOME Fair Market Rents, operational expenses and unit mix; and Whereas, using this formula the fee is $70,291 per unit; and Whereas, Resolution No. 20-230 established the current fee. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. In accordance with Section 14-2G-8F, an owner may contribute to a Riverfront Crossings District affordable housing fund a fee in the amount of $70,291 per Affordable Housing dwelling unit the owner would otherwise be required to provide pursuant to Section 14- 2G-8. The fee applies to all affordable housing agreements entered into after passage of this resolution. 2. Resolution No. 20-230 is rescinded. Passed and approved this 10th day of January 20 May Attest: Approved by • City Attor 's Office (Sue Dulek - 01/04/2023) Resolution No. 23-10 Page 2 It was moved by Dunn and seconded by Bergus The Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent X Alter X Bergus X Dunn X Harmsen X Taylor X Teague X Thomas Item Number: 6.j. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !_iklir�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution authorizing the acquisition of property interests necessary for construction of the Bancroft/Russell Drives and McLean Street/Lexington Avenue Sanitary Sewer Repairs Project. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Fiscal Impact: Recommendations: Attachments: Joe Welter, Senior Engineer Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Funding will be in the Annual Sewer Main Replacement, Account #V31 01 Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Resolution Exhibit A Executive Summary: Preliminary design for the BancroftlRussell Drives and McLean StreetlLexington Avenue Sanitary Sewer Repairs Project has been completed. Temporary construction easements will be needed to access these repair locations, as well as conducting the construction work, which will include removal and replacement of sanitary sewer manholes and pipes. Background /Analysis: Spot repairs, including replacement manholes and pipes, are needed on the sanitary sewer systems between Bancroft and Russell Drives and near McLean Street and Lexington Avenue. Access to these repair locations and the construction work to accomplish the repairs require temporary construction easements. Once the repairs are made, the areas excavated for construction will be restored as close to the existing conditions as possible. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution & Exhibit A Prepared by: Joe Wetter, Engineering Division, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240, (319) 356-5144 Resolution No. 23-11 Resolution authorizing the acquisition of property interests necessary for construction of the Bancroft/Russell Drives and McLean Street/Lexington Avenue Sanitary Sewer Repairs Project. Whereas, the City of Iowa City desires to construct Bancroft/Russell Drives and McLean Street/Lexington Avenue Sanitary Sewer Repairs ("Project") which includes replacement of sanitary sewer manholes and pipes between Bancroft and Russell Drives and near McLean Street and Lexington Avenue; and Whereas, the City Council has determined that construction of the Project is a valid public purpose under State and Federal law, and has further determined that acquisition of certain property rights is necessary to construct, operate and maintain the proposed project; and Whereas, the City staff has determined the location of the proposed Project; and Whereas, City staff should be authorized to acquire necessary property rights at the best overall price to the City; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Annual Sewer Main Replacement, Account #V3101. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council finds that it is in the public interest to acquire property rights by warranty deed, quit -claim deed, and/or easement for the construction of the Bancroft/Russell Drives and McLean Street/Lexington Avenue Sanitary Sewer Repairs ("Project") which Project constitutes a public improvement under Iowa law. The City Council further finds that acquisition of said property rights is necessary to carry out the functions of the Project, and that such Project constitutes a valid public purpose under state and federal law. 2. The City Council hereby approves the preliminary route of this public improvement project, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to negotiate the purchase of property rights by warranty deed, quit -claim deed and/or easement for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Project. The City Manager or designee is authorized to sign purchase agreements for the purchase of property and/or easements, and offers to purchase property and/or easements. 4. The City Manager or designee, in consultation with the City Attorney's Office, is authorized and directed to establish, on behalf of City, an amount the City believes to be just compensation for the property to be acquired, and to make an offer to purchase the property for the established fair market value. 5. In the event negotiation is successful, the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and attest easement agreements and agreements in lieu of condemnation. The City Attorney is hereby directed to take all necessary action to complete said transactions, as required by law. Resolution No. 23-11 Page 2 6. In the event the necessary property rights for the Project cannot be acquired by negotiation, the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to initiate condemnation proceedings for acquisition of any and all property rights necessary to fulfill the functions of the Project, as provided by law. Passed and approved this LOth day of January Attest: It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X X , 2023 Approved by • City Attorne ' O ice (Liz Craig - 01/05/2023) and seconded by Bergus Nays: Absent: Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague Thomas Dunn the Resolution be 2122 8 13121314 2119 1 I 2120 2129 i 2139 331! 4 2174 2119 2129 — I 2139 Approximate area of repair 1ct 0 2149 2209 2206 _ I 2120 } 2128 1 � - I 2138 2148 2168 2204 1- 720 714 1 � I 712 708 440 r - 0 O 438 436 406 • •• • ••• . •N • • ••• M • •� • �': " • EXHIBIT A A Item Number: 6.k. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution approving agreement by and between ICON Arts Academy and the City of Iowa City. Prepared By: Wendy Ford, Economic Development Coordinator Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The $79,380 forgivable loan will be funded by the Climate Action Fund. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Grant Agreement Attachment A Executive Summary: ICON Arts Academy has applied for a grant to replace all fluorescent and incandescent lighting with LED fixtures and occupancy sensors in the historic Brewery Square building in Downtown Iowa City. The total project cost is $158,760 and the 50% matching grant request, is $79,380. This project will be funded by the Climate Action Fund. The agreement takes the form of a forgivable loan to ensure the project is completed and maintained for at least three years. Background /Analysis: The lighting replacement will greatly reduce energy costs for lighting the Arts Academy and for air- conditioning required to cool the building due to the reduction in heat output of the LED lighting. On August 6, 2019, the City Council declared a climate crisis for the City and accelerated the City's goals for carbon emission reduction to reach net -zero emissions by the year 2050. As a result of this declaration, the City Council accepted an action plan in their effort to accomplish this goal. The Emergency property tax levy is being utilized to enhance and support efforts to reduce carbon emissions city-wide and within City operations. The Emergency property tax levy is set at $.20 per $1,000 of valuation and is expected to generate approximately $850k in revenue to be utilized to help the City meet its climate action goals. The borrower is a commercial user within the Northside Marketplace and has applied for this assistance to fund improvements to its facilities that are anticipated to reduce its carbon emissions. The source of funds for this forgivable loan will come from the Climate Action Fund, as opposed to TI F funds from the downtown (City -University) Urban Renewal Area because it is outside the boundaries of the TI F district. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Agreement Attachment A d 111hII II III II IIIII 1111 Doc ID 032027900071 Type GEN Kind: RESOLUTION Recorded: 01/24/2023 at 10:19:43 Fee Amt: $357.00 Page 1 of 71 Johnson County Iowa Kim Painter County Recorder BK6454 PG615-685 STATE OF IOWA ) ) SS JOHNSON COUNTY I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Resolution attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 23-12 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the loth day of January 2023, all as the same appears of record in my office. c� Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this day of January 2023. Kellie K. Fruehling i r City Clerk \res 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 • (319) 356-5000 ■ FAX (319) 356-5009 0,k Prepared by: Wendy Ford, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5248 Resolution No. 23-12 Resolution approving agreement by and among ICON Arts Academy and the City of Iowa City. Whereas, the City of Iowa City adopted a Climate Action Plan in 2018 and an Accelerating Iowa City's Climate Actions report in 2020, including incentives for business to reduce carbon emissions, objectives of which may be funded from the Emergency property tax levy; and Whereas, ICON Arts Academy, Inc. ("ICON") a commercial user in the Northside Marketplace, has applied for this assistance to fund improvements to its facility that are anticipated to reduce its carbon emissions; and Whereas, objectives in the plan are funded in part from the Emergency property tax levy; and Whereas, the attached Energy Efficiency Forgivable Loan Agreement ("Agreement") has been negotiated to grant a forgivable loan to ICON to assist with the described carbon emission reducing improvements; and Whereas, it is in the best interests of the public to approve said Agreement. Now, therefore, be it resolved, by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section 1. That this Agreement by and among the City of Iowa City Iowa and ICON is in the public interest of the residents of Iowa City; and Section 2. That said Agreement is consistent with the Climate Action Plan goals; and Section 3. That the Mayor is authorized and directed to execute the Agreement in a form approved by the City attorney, and the City Clerk is authorized and directed to attest the signature and to affix the seal of the City Clerk; and Section 4. That the Mayor and the City Clerk be and are hereby authorized and directed to take all such actions and do all such things as they shall determine to be necessary or appropriate to ensure the City's performance as provided therein; and Section 5. That the City Clerk be directed to certify and record the Agreement in the Johnson County Recorder's office at ICON's expense; and Section 6. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to administer the terms of the Agreement. Passed and approved this loch day of January , 2023. -1- M Approved: City Attor y — 01 /05/2023 -2- Resolution No. 23-12 Page 1 It was moved by Minn and seconded by Bergus The Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent X Alter X Bergus X Dunn X Harmsen X Taylor X Teague X Thomas Energy Efficiency Forgivable Loan Agreement This Agreement is hereby made by and between ICON Arts Academy, Inc. (Borrower) whose physical address is 123 N. Linn Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240, and the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation whose address is 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa ("City"). Whereas, on August 6, 2019, the City Council declared a climate crisis for the City and accelerated the City's goals for carbon emission reduction to reach net -zero emissions by the year 2050. As a result of this declaration, the City Council has accepted an action plan in their effort to accomplish this goal. The Emergency property tax levy is being utilized to enhance and support efforts to reduce carbon emissions city-wide and within City operations. The Emergency property tax levy is set at $.20 per $1,000 of valuation this year and is expected to generate over $850,000 in revenue to be utilized to help the City meet its climate action goals; and Whereas, Borrower, a commercial user within the North Marketplace Commercial district, has applied for this assistance to fund improvements to its facilities that are anticipated to reduce its carbon emissions; and Whereas, Borrower, has applied for this assistance to fund improvements to its facilities that are anticipated to reduce its carbon emissions. Now, therefore, for the consideration described herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Project: The Project removes all incandescent and fluorescent lighting fixtures and will replace all lighting with LED fixtures and occupancy sensors reducing the need for energy for lighting and air conditioning. Most of the mechanical system is being reused, and where additional conditioning is required, high efficiency heat pumps will be used. The Project will be completed on or before August 1, 2023. 2. Legal description: Iowa City (Original Town) Lots 1 & 2 & E 40' Lot 3 Blk 67, according to the assessor's website. 3. Economic Development Grant: In the event Borrower timely completes the Project described above and provides the City with evidence of invoices paid to contractors for Project Construction Costs in amounts that are equal to or exceed $158,760, then the City shall grant Borrower $79,380, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. In no event shall the City's contribution toward this Project exceed 50% of the total Project cost ("Principal Amount"). Should the Project cost be less than the projected $158,760, the City's contribution will be limited to 50% of the actual Project Construction Costs. Project Construction Costs are defined as the cost for the equipment and installation of the equipment as detailed in the attached Bill of Material. 4. Source of Grant Funds Limited: Funds for this Economic Development Grant shall come from the Emergency Levy. 5. Maintenance, Operation and Reporting: Borrower agrees to construct, maintain, and operate the Project in excellent working condition in a manner consistent with the energy efficiencies described above for a period of three years. Borrower must submit to the City three (3) annual reports detailing the monthly energy usage and energy costs incurred for the above -described property compared to the monthly energy usage and energy costs incurred in the year before the Project was constructed. This comparison is material to the City's determination of whether the Project is being maintained and operated in accordance with this agreement. These reports shall be due annually on August 1. 6. Repayment Term: Borrower shall not be obligated to make payments toward the Principal Amount so long as Borrower satisfies the obligations described in Paragraphs 1 and 5 above. 7. Interest: No interest shall accrue on the Principal Amount during the term of this loan. 8. Release: The City shall forgive this Matching Grant on or about August 1, 2026, upon a determination made in its sole discretion that Borrower has satisfied the terms of this Agreement and issue a release to be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's office at Borrower's expense. 9. Default and Remedy: If Borrower does not timely complete, maintain and operate the improvements as required herein, for three years from the completion of the Project, the Principal Amount shall be immediately due and payable 60 days after the City mails written notice to Borrower to cure the default at the address listed above and Borrower's failure to cure said default. The City reserves the right to pursue any other remedy available to it at law or equity to collect the amount then due. 10. Representations and Warranties: Borrower represents and warrants: (a) It is a company duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Iowa and registered to do business in the State of Iowa and have all requisite power and authority to develop and construct the Project, to carry on their businesses as now conducted and as presently proposed to be conducted, and to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement; (b) This Agreement has been duly and validly authorized, executed and delivered by the Borrower and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the City, is in full force and effect and is a valid and legally binding instrument of Borrower enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as the same may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other laws relating to or affecting creditors' rights generally; (c) Neither Borrower nor any person or entity with an ownership interest of more than 25% of Borrower have been adjudicated guilty or liable in any judicial or administrative proceeding of committing a repeated or willful violation of the Iowa Wage Payment Collection law, the Iowa Minimum Wage Act, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act or any comparable state statute or local ordinance, which governs the payment of wages in the last 5 years. 10. Contractor Labor Law Compliance: Borrower acknowledges that the City of Iowa City will not contract with nor provide any economic development incentives to any person or entity who has participated in wage theft by violation of the Iowa Wage Payment Collection law, the Iowa Minimum Wage Act, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) or any comparable state statute or local ordinance, which governs the payment of wages. Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is a violation of the FLSA and is included in the definition of wage theft. Borrower agrees that it will require, in any construction contract for the Project the following written provisions, proof of which must be provided to City prior to the start of construction: a) Agreement by the General Contractor to comply with all state, federal and local laws and regulations, including, but not limited to the requirements of Iowa Code Chapter 91C (Contractor Registration with the Iowa Division of Labor), Iowa Code Chapter 91A (Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law), Iowa Code Chapter 91D (Minimum Wage), the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Internal Revenue Code; b) Agreement by the General Contractor to provide to the Borrower and the City no later than the filing of an application for issuance of a building permit, the names and addresses of each subcontractor and the dollar value of the work the subcontractor is expected to perform; c) Demonstration by the General Contractor that it has the capacity to meet all performance, and labor and material payment, bonding requirements relative to the Project. d) Providing to the City a certificate by the General Contractor's insurer that it has in force all insurance coverage required with respect to construction of the Project, including $1,000,000 Commercial General Liability Insurance and Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by Chapter 85, Code of Iowa. e) Demonstration by the General Contractor that it has required all subcontractors to agree, in writing, that the subcontractor will comply with all state, federal and local laws and administrative rules and regulations, including, but not limited to the requirements of Iowa Code Chapter 91C (Contractor Registration with the Iowa Division of Labor), Iowa Code Chapter 91A (Iowa Wage Payment Collection Law), Iowa Code Chapter 91D (Minimum Wage), the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act, and the Internal Revenue Code. 11. Indemnification: Borrower releases the City and the governing body members, officers, agents, servants and employees thereof (hereinafter, "Indemnified Parties") from, covenant and agree that the Indemnified Parties shall not be liable for, and agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties against, any loss or damage to property or any injury to or death of any person occurring at or about, or resulting from any defect in, the Project or Borrower's property described in above. 12. Covenant: This Agreement shall constitute a covenant running with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Agreed to on this 10thday of January Borrower: By: Leslie Nolte ICON Arts Academy Approved by: City Attorney Offi e , 2023. City: 772..et8u,_&_ BrJce.*eague, Mayor Attest: 1 Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk CITY ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF IOWA SS: JOHNSON COUNTY ) On this lOttaay of January , 2023, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa, personally appeared Bruce Teague , as Mayor, and Kellie Fruehling as City Clerk, of the City of Iowa City, Iowa. %A" /Iw. TAMARA NEUMANN Commission Number MY COMMISSION EXPIRES B MARCH 14.2025 STATE OF 1 o is COUNTY OF Jc>h�sC,-\ ��rnnavtet_ Notary Public in and for the Stare of Iowa My commission expires: 63/1A-1I,9,ed6 BORROWER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT )SS This instrument was acknowledged before me on this 10 day of )ccia , as 3c c i &:r of ICON Arts Academy. low,' ASHLEY A JAY-PLATZ Commission No. 785030 My Commission Expires July 14, 202 Notary Public 2023, by BILL OF MATERIAL lIL Inc EIEC1ICAL EFFGINEERI' 4G $ EQUIPMENT COMPANY 206 E 5th St Davenport, la 52801 Tel: 563-323-2214 Fax: 563-323-2261 Toll Free: 800-323-2214 Project Name: Iowa Conservatory Company; Merit Electric Name: Mike Date: Prepared by: TONY PLACE PROJECT MANAGER Qty Type MFG Description Comments 37 C1 PRESCOLITE LBRP-M-LSMLCS9 / LBRP-6RD-T-D / LB-6R-F-TG RECESSED DOWN LIGHTS 81 Li SLG SALP-M1-4-LS1-CSID-F-G1-FSK-E-60 4' SUSPENDED DIRECT/INDIRECT 26 L2 SLG SALP-M1-4-LS1-CSID-F-G1-FSK-E-60 4' SUSPENDED DIRECT 10 L3 LITECOTROL 4L-P-D-3-03-SOF-C1-35K-D100-D01 UNV-FAI -W 1-CB1 3' SUSPENDED DIRECT 17 L4 SLG SL-6-4-40-G1-35K 4' RECESSED 2 L5 LITECONTROL 4L-DW-D-12-08-SOF-C1-35K-D100-D01-1C- UNIV-W3 12' RECESSED 5 LC LITECONTROL 22L-W-I-LPA-04-4-C1-35K-I125-D01-1C- UNV-W 1 4' INDIRECT COVE 1 LW LITECONTROL 4L-P-AD-14-08-ASYM--C1-35K-D100- D01-UNV-W 3-FAI -CBI 14' SUSPENDED WALL WASH 6 P1 KUZCO PD80324-WH 24" RING PENDANT 8 P2 KUZCO PD15302-WH 11?18/2022 Confidential Page 1 of 2 BILL OF MATERIAL lIL Inc EIEC1ICAL EFFGINEERI' 4G $ EQUIPMENT COMPANY 206 E 5th St Davenport, la 52801 Tel: 563-323-2214 Fax: 563-323-2261 Toll Free: 800-323-2214 Project Name: Iowa Conservatory Company; Merit Electric Name: Mike Date: Prepared by: TONJY PLACE PROJECT MANAGER Qty Type MFG Description Comments SMALL SINGLE PENDANT 10 F1 HUB CSL4-LSCS 4' STRIP 17 T1 ELITE ET20BWH PAR30 TRACK HEADS 3 T1 ELITE ET106-AWH END CAP 11118r2022 Confidential Page 2 of 2 erescolite LBRP-RD PRO CARLESS DIRECT INSTALL DOWNLIGHT FEATURES ▪ 4', 6" and 8" apertures, delivering 800 to 5000 lumens • Spun aluminum anodized ar white trim, 55 deg cutoff ▪ Switchable Lumen, CCT, and Beam Angie • Integral wiring compartment (standard) • Optional support pans for Joist or T-Grid ceilings ▪ Universal 120-277V v�ith 0.10V Dim to Off • Long Life L70 at >50,000 hrs [TM-21) Five year warranty Intertek SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION ▪ Canlcss direct install New. Construction or Remodel, Non -IC. Select IC models available. Integral wiring compartment (standard) can eliminate the need for an additional J-Box ▪ Retention tether provided to secure to building structure if needed • Fixture modules can be used with interchangeable trims In 3 apertures °PTII High quality spun aluminum reflector with 55* cutoff provides excellent lumen delivery while reducing glare • OptiwwBIWhite Corte and Flange or Diffuse Anodized Cone and White flange available • Optical assembly standard with dial -in beam angle from 24' to 45' with indicators ▪ Polycarbonate lensed optic, suitable for wet teCatipn, covered ceiling applications ELECTRICAL • LED array with 3 SGChi color consistency • Long LED life: Maintains 70% of lumen output at >50,000 hours of operation (L70 at >50,000hr TM-211 • Switchable CCT (2700K, 3000K• 3500K, 4000K, 5000K) (SL and ML modules only) • HL modules: Choose from 5 fixed CCTs in 2700K, 3000K. 3500K., 4000K or 5000K • 90 CRI+ with P9 >50 DATE: I LOCATION: TYPE: CI CATALOG 4: PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY LBRP•M•LSMLCS9/LBRP-6RD T•DIL.S•6R•F-TC LITE RELATED PRODUCTS 8 L teBox Family `(select models' ELECTRICAL (CONTINUED) • Swttchable Lumen, 3 settings per module: SL (800f120011600 Im); ML f16001180012100 Im) HL 13000/4000/5000 Im) ▪ High efficiency integral driver with universal 120-277V, 50/60Hz • Flicker -free 0-10V Dim to Off • see Additional Information section for a list of recommended dimmers • Meets Class A (<24dba) noise rating ▪ FCC CFR 47 Part 15 Class B • 1.0.9 Power Factor. <20% THD INSTALLATION • Robust trim mounting springs hold fixture firmly against ceiling surface • Accommodates ceiling thicknesses up to 2" • Fixture installs below the Ceiling without housing • Optional support pan accessories with or without bar hangers available ▪ Switchable CCT: Field select one of five CCTs at installation with an integral switch on back of fixture module. (5L and ML only) • 5witChabie Lumen_ Field select one of three lumen outputs at installation with an integral switch on back of fixture module. • Switchabie Beam: Field adjust beam angle using optical dial and Indicator on module pro SERVICE PROGRAMS CERTIFICATIONS • cETLus listed to U L1598 STOCK • Can be used in direct contact with insulation (IC Rated. SL Only) • Certified Air Tight per ASTN1 E2 3 • Suitable for wet locations. covered ceilings • ENERGY STAR° Certified ▪ SL modules meet CA Title 24 High Efficacy (JA8-2019) requirement WARRANTY • 5 year warranty • See HLI Standard Warranty for additional information KEY DATA Lumen Range 832-4915 Wattage Range 9.6-54.9 Efficacy Range ILPW) 72-100 Reported Life (How) L70 f >50.000 Input Currant 125-219 (120V) ,81WO1OHd SSIA Ab'da 1VNOl5N Y Ia 8 }IDO15 d2i81 Based on Dituae Amazed 3000Ic 96 {RI Page 116 Peu, o3 iv n C 2022 Hu Swoons Inc Spectecations subject to change rethout notice L91tP-ieG 701 Fanenrvum 81w - GreemnIa. $C 2%071 Tel 864 676,1000 r orebsrte w MMINBSCVrtte COMn HUBBEILL' Lightlirtg erescolite LBRP-RD PRO CANLESS DIRECT INSTALL DOWNLIGHT ORDERING GUIDE CATALOG* HOUSING LBRP-M Fb tore Motile, Round Direct Irrxall, 120`277V- ith 0-10V dim to Crff TRIM (ORDER SEPARATELY Model [ LBRP LteBox Pro Tarn — LS DATE: LOCATION: CRd colt for Stock fiV arra' deco Example: LBRP-M-LSSLCS9 f L2RP-4RD-T-D Switchabte Technology Nominal Lumen Range CCT'CP' LS 9witchable Lunen 4RD 4• Round 0ownlights 5RD fr' Round Ddwnfiiit SRC) 8'140011 bOwnigtrt SL 800J1200t1600lumerr_ F4L 1600V1800F2100 lumens Acces rder separately) ❑ LB-4R-F-TG [ LB-4R-F-J ihecc"SOrY. Pan wager Hangers ipr T-trielk1061, 4• ROuMd Ac Or Pan Sopportlot Joist 4•Rourlp LB-6 R-F-TG ACCeWiry wear Hangers for T ,rrdlJoIst: 6' Round LB-6 R-F-J Accesstw Pan Support for Joist. 6'Round ❑ ILB•BR•F•TG Accessury.wwBarHangers for T-GridfJois48"Rand ❑ ILB•8R•F•J Accessory, Pan Support for Joist, 8• Round FL 100400015000lumens' s9 S.+ritmabie CCT 1.27CO.3O7Cs'35C 4CO0+5000n 90 CFO 27K9 2700K, 90 CRI 3OI0 3000K. 90 CRI 35K9 3500K.90 CRI 40K9 4000X. 90 CRI 5013 5000K, 90 CRI Reflector Finish,'Co' nr D Diffuse Clear Anodized WC White Cone and Flange DWT 0inuse Clear anodized aih White Flange wales: 1 a•T0111144use001y MSLC.FA_ hMuIe. >1301S d i91 'age 215 Rev.03t17i12 C: 2022 HLI So4roona Inc Specracabon5 sr rbJect to change v+Ilh t nalice LORP-R i 701 Mllennyum Bwd - Greenow. SC 298071 Tel 86467$1000 r Wleberte wnnvprBSSvlite.corn HUBBELL' Lightllg erescolite LBRP-RD PRO CANLESS DIRECT INSTALL DOWNLIGHT DIMENSIONS Aperture 4" 6" 8" Ceiling Cutout Mlln: has€. 04.72'-5.46' (0119.9-138.7mml 06,30'-7,01' (0160,0-180,3mmj' 07.87 .8.74' (0 99.9-222.0mm) Nominal Module Lumen Aperture Rastage 4' SL•ML SL-ML HL SL-ML HL 5' 8' DATE A Aperture Diameter 4.15' (105.4 mm) 5.65' (143.6 mm) 5,65' (143,6 mm) 725' (184.2 mm) 725' (1$4.2 mm) LOCATION: E3 Overall Trim Diameter 6.00' (152.4 mm) 750' p90.4 mm) 750' (190,4 mm) 9.10 1231.1 mm) 910- {231.1 mmj c Overall Module Heat Sink 4.35' 010.5 mm) 4.35' 010.5 mm) 0 Overall Height (Assembled) 5,35' (135.9 rnm) 5.85' (148.6 mm) 5.55' (140.9 mm) 5.55' (148,6 mm) 4.35- {110,5 mmll 6,65' {165,9 mm) 5.55' (140.9 mm) $.65' (168. mm) Page3/4 Rev,03t17122 LEIRP-110 2022 HU Salaam Inc Specalcat ons subject to charge without nalke 101 Mnenrvum 8 - Greemnue. SC 296071 Tel 864678d000 r orebsrte wwwpr65CVrite.carn HUBBEILL' Lighting erescolite LBRP-RD PRO CANLESS DIRECT INSTALL DOWNLIGHT PERFORMANCE DATA TABLE DATE LOCATION: Lumen Madule wiiehable Nominal Lumen Setting Lumens Delivered Lumens 4„ 6' Watts LPW Delivered Lumens Wa115 LPW Delivered Lumens 8" Watts LPW 5L PAL HL Low 800 832 9-6 87 880 9.6 92 849 9.6 SS Med 1200 1174 143 83 1243 141 88 1198 14,1 85 High 1600 1560 19.6 79 1649 19.6 84 1592 19.6 81 Lour 1600 1578 201 78 1668 201 83 1610 20.1 80 Med 1800 1808 23-9 76 1912 23-9 80 1845 23-9 77 High 2100 2134 297 72 2257 29.7 76 2178 29.7 73 Low 3000 NA NA NA 3142 31.6 100 3033 31.6 96 Med 4000 NA NA NA 3953 41.0 97 3815 41.0 93 High 5000 NA NA NA 4915 54-9 90 4744 5.19 86 pegs 416 Pam, 03117122 C 2022 Hu Solutions, Inc SpeclfkatiOns wtiect to change witrictrt Mike HUB6EILL' 101 Mllenr J n 8114 - Greenville. SC 2%071 Tel 864678d000 r wegslte wxwprBSSAdlte.cOrn Lighting erescolite LBRP-RD PRO CARLESS DIRECT INSTALL DOWNLIGHT PHOTOMETRY LBRP-Ml-L55LC59 ! LBRP-4RD-T-D LUMINAIIRIE DATA Test No. 21.01863 De4cription 4" LSSL, Med Lumen. @3000K, 45" Beam De[aered Lumens 1174 Wafts 14.1W Efficacy 83 M ntira7 f 949556<1 Spacing Criterion 0.7 ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zorn* LurMnr % Lunissini 040 1138 96,9 0-54 1170 99.7 0,90 1174 100.0 0.180 1174 1000 LBRP-M-LSSLCS9 J LBRP-ERD T-D LUMINAIIRE DATA Teat F. 21,02002 Description 6" L$SL, Med Lumen, ,03000K, ems' Be,,m Dervered Lumens 1243 Watts 141W Efficacy 88 Mauntirg Receascd Spacing Critedeo 0E6 ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zane Lumens %Lumineire 0 1155 93.4 0-60 1239 997 0-90 1243 10(10 0-180 12413 100.0 LBRP-M-L SLCS9 l LBRP-8RD T-D LLPC IN &IRE DATA Teat f4o, 21,01964 DescrIptran 8" LSSL, Med Lumen 03000k, 5' B'n' Dervered Lumens 1198 Watts 14,1W Efficacy 85 Mcuntirg Recessed Spacing Criterion 0.6 ZONAL LUMEN( SUMMARY Zone Lumens %Lumineire 0-4,0 1122 93.6 0-60 1197 99.9 0-90 1198 10010 0-180 1198 1000 LUMEN MULTIPLIER POLAR GRAPH DATE: 5SJ Aso - a' POLAR GRAPH er POLAR GRAPH A' vcr sir 46 4h' 4I sa 41, LOCATION: CANDELA DISTRIBUTION LUMINANCE (DATA' Degree Candela 0 1803 5 1736 15 1318 25 844 35 408 45 27 55 8 65 3 75 1 85 0 90 0 Vertica, Angle Average 45' 4710 55' 1720 65' 876 75" 477 S5' 4 'CandelalSqurale Meter CANDELA DISTRIBUTION LUMINANCE (DATA* Degree ClIn0c ' 0 2008 5 1884 15 1288 25 767 35 422 45 51 55 4 65 2 75 1 85 1 90 0 Vgrtirnl Angle Avenge 45' 4705 55' 655 65' 309 75' 252 85' 749 'CAndele/Squure meter CANDELA DISTRIBUTION LUMINANCE DATA` Degree Candela 0 2245 5 2011 15 1289 25 748 35 382 45 38 55 2 65 1 75 0 85 0 90 0 Vertical Angle Average 45, 55' 65` 75" 85- 2018 131 619 0 0 'Cpndela/Squue Meter 011410m Multiplier 27K, 90 CRI a99 30K. 90 CRI 1.00 35K.90 CRI I 401(.90 CRI 1-04 105 50K. 90 CRI 1.09 Photomelrics above ere pulAisned et nominal 30001C 90 CRL This sable mar be used 10 apixd,imace the lumen values at differ Kehdn temperature seriegs. Power consirmpllon remains the same. P&p 64 Rey, 83.,47122 > 2022 HL1 Sokinona Inc Specifications subject to change without notice L9PP4e) HUBBELL' 701 rnllerrrwrm 8114I -Greenville. SC 29607 i Tel 864978,10001 We5site wxiwprescolite.corn Lighting erescolite LBRP-RD PRO CANLESS DIRECT INSTALL DOWNLIGHT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION DATE Dimming Compatibility See ine Dli A1i \ G i ik for more information on dimming compatibility and recommended dimmer list LOCATION: 2 P-wgn 616 rag.', 03/17133 C2022 Hu Sakrtiorks, Inc $Qeciecabens Subject to change 1/4thout no1 ce LIMP -NYC HUBBELL' 701MllenrlJn 8eerrui e.$C MarTel 864678,10001web6ltewwwpr gllte.corn LiR tlfg Columbia LIGHTING DATE TYPE: Fi LOCATION: I PROJECT: ICYWA CONSERVATORY CSL STR!PLIGHT FEATURES • 4ft a nd eft lengths • Switchable CCT. 350t W400015000K • Wide range of applicatiOnS • 80+CRI • 0-10V dirnrning • Surface mount on wall or ceiling • Universal voltage (120-277Y) • Switchable Lumen Technology SPECIFICATIONS OPTICS • Frosted acrylic lens INSTALLATION • Fully assernbled lOr quick irl$t8ll8tiOr5 ELECTRICAL • 54,000 hour LED5 at L70 for reduced maintenance ORDERING GUIDE CATALOG #: CSL4-LSCS CERTIFICATIONS • All luminaires are built to UL159$ standards and bear appropriate ETL labels • Damp location label standard - DLCT (DesignLights Consortium) Qualified. Pleaserefer to the DLC website for specific product qualifications at wwwdesignlights.org tradesELE T• WARRANTY • 5 year warranty • See HLI Standard Warranty for additional information ! :::.:Jail `.IO. LI I'w Lorne -a 3503K 40130K 5030K K CSL4-1..SCS 840141403625 CSL8-LSCS 340141403632 4' LED S4rlpligra. 3$I»450N5200 Sued -able Lumens. 3500V4000'5404K 5riItchanle CC? 0-10v d:rrniv 8 LEO Sl r plight 7400 $40019200 `yrdtdlable Lumens. 3500.4000 5000K S.+itcretrle CCT, 0.10V derwrio9 4050 4274 4072 30 142 MED 4875 5191 4872 33 128 137 128 HIGH LOW 5402 7387 5770 7771 5405 7404 45 60 120 123 128 130 120 123 MED 8283 8664 8257 72 115 120 115 HIGH 9319 9959 9351 90 116 124 117 Accessories (Order Separately Gl..HS 5' adjustable Cable ro wswsicei mount KEY DATA Lumen Range 40550-9559 Wattage Range 30-80 Efficacy Range (LPW) 115-142 Reported Life (Hours) L70r54,000 .0,41 401Od-1d e 1313HS `11S $ NIMb2Ia 1VNOGSNOWI0 I:r .. O0.1D7I1"1 COL-CSL-1ppc 0 2021 Columbia Lyrriing. a jM9t3n U HuhbHl LIglIng. Inc Specdcsifons aU4tect to chmge wRho'A rbdc6, 7p1 4II nrwm 8t4-GreenWIIQ. SC 29607. TQ18646781080; we*, s1te vnmcolumblogr,ting,com (MUfitiLL.) HUBBELL Lighting Columbia LIGHTING sL STR!PLIGHT DIMENSIONS 48.0" (1219.2mm) 22.4" (668.3mm) (33.3mm) 1.31' (33.3mm)+4 2.63" (66.7mm) 24_0' (609.6rtilm) 4 2.63" (66.7mm) rl DATE I LOCATION: TYPE: F) I PROJECT: ICYWA CONSERVATORY CATALOG #: CSL4-LSCS 2.69" (68.3mm) 0,75" (19.1mm) 2,25' (57,2mm) 25.19" (639.8mm) ' r 1.31' (33,3mrn) Ili47:9" (1217:6mm) 46.6' (1182.7mm) 95.9" (2435.2mm) A -718" diameter knockout B - 5/32" x 114' Mole ;be 2.63" (56.7mm)—Pl--�+ PHOTOMETi RY CSL4-LSCS 4OGOK 38W LUMINAIRE DATA TTSI N0. Dewriplion Delivered Lvmar Ala=Ls Efficacy Spacing Catalan EWA..STO4BLSCS(38WA00Oi ) IradeSELECP CSL,. R.—ought 5204 324 0°=1,32 90°=1,26 ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone Lament % Lumilait 0-30 1059 20,5 0-40 1770 34.0 0-60 3241 62.3 0-90 4662 89.6 0-180 S204 100.0 POLAR GRAPH 2.69° (68.3mm) j—Ell/ 0,75' (19.1nm) 2.25" (57,2mm) 17• 155 1455 750 750 1450 150 155 4411 • 15 50 HataQ"100 120 199 14 �s. sa 45 A ll3NJO1OHd 8 Page 212 raw 041 7V31 0 2021 Columbia L1gh1Ing, a 0M99n 0 Hubbell Lighting. Inc, $pecdca lone stkiect to change w4hou1 mace. CP14+-C34-spas 701 640441744101 MKT - Gr04454190 $C 29607. Tel 8646781060; wemQ vnvmcorumboaserarg,com HUBBELL Lighting DF31GN SERIES SAP M7 .3" Slim Architectural Linear Pendant Mount l},E SALP M T 2,3' Stith Architectural linear Pendant Mount is on ultra - sleek lighting solution Ihnt is fully customizable to meet the unique needs of each application. The lengths come in 2 ft, 4 ft, and 8 ft with selectable color temperature, wattage, and distributions, The minimalist and elegant aesthetic paired with brilliant illumination and even distribution will elevate your space in a range of applications, including offices, lobbies, and retail spaces- This versatile architectural luminaire possesses unlimited design potential for endless design pattern possibilities. APPLICATIONSCommercial, Retail, Hospitality, Education, Airport, Medical, and any open spaces that inquire a unique and elegant architectural lighting design- 1 OFFICE SPACES r;vl.^nw PROJECT: IovkrA CONSERVATORY CATALOG #: F-M1-4-IS1 CSW1-F-G1-FDK-E- O FIXTURE TYPE: Li NOTES: 1. tFIJ tasi1. ILpl:hr: r r„wrRn L`.Dhloido04-.r ii BUILT TO ORDER All orders are carefully assembled in Houston, TX, to meet the unique needs of each application and project, RETAIL Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without nonce. t0643 W. Airport Itaulevari, Suite t40U I Ihhugen, Tex 1 713-389-5680 1022 Spring lighing Group. All Rights leant selesE?slgus. om Pie Sal,PM 1.21.03 1:161GN SERIES PRODUCT OPTIONS DRIVER LENS Internal Driver Seleeloble Distribution SELECTABLE LIGHTING DISTRIBUTIONS not lens Direct Semi -Direct Cseneral Diffuse Semi -Indirect Indirect CANOPY SIZE & SHAPE MOUNTING STYLES Loin Round 4.5in Round Designed for power cnhle Drywall Ceiling w% Internal Driver T-Grid Clips Suspends Iuminaire in T-grid. Carrrpalible with 9/16" and 15/16'"Flat 9/16-and 15/16" Slat Ceiliv Types. Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates moy change witlwat notice. 10643 W. Airport Boulevard, Suite t400 I Houston, Tex 1 713389-5680 sulesr?slgus.mm Pie 2/6 S VM1.21.03 118112 Spring lighln! Group. All Rights leered OES1GN SERIES ORDERING GUIDE The Ordering Guide is not complete without Filling out the Layout Sketch located on page 6. If you have any questions, please contact sales. LumitwireType: Width 'Length Lumren Peer Ft Intcrnol Driver Lena Generation CCT Finish SAW -'.Vldth SI.n Archtocl.ral • Po-donl Mount PM Ai*eium 2.s- # - 4 LS i *111 Inl*md brir*r wig. $J*esehl* byr$ui o F floe L.ns .01 Fflf ti*Id $*I*ere1,I* CCT 3COOY{35001V40OOIC &look VAN 100%up 9O%do. / 10 * Mt; da+•n/7SAup 50%down /50%up 251t down / 75% up 10%down /9Q1 t IOC& down 'sbrk C C._sLom Co Or Incrominhni2fool *Ignytli_ Thy $ALP MT is orailiWq in 2`, d' and B' lkngrhs that can be directly connpogd tngathcr in a continuous run up to 40' (1200 or 104` (277V1. P1 ass mop thy Layout $kgtyh on pawl 6 far full dgrails.. MOUNTING Ceiling Plan Suspended Lengths E Cry' Well Wow* IoJ.boxl lii0 ace Atuof Coble witty 48' Powa' Cord T1Drop Codling Clips I'S.IIol hoeP/161and15/Ii Flot Celingl T'2 Drop Cei l irk C I ko s 15u ito hl a For 9/ 16. Slot Cei l i'9l T3 Th'opCalirylCIO 15..140Eefor 15JI.5`SblCeiing) ILK lad' Ash Coble wih1ae'Power CGrd 240 2+10' Adroo t Cable •nth 240' Rotor Cord PATTERN CONNECTORS ' Cannectar 'T' (oFtnlular 'L' Canoeclor T Connector ACCESSORIES 1:31Nipped ..perni.Fy. k.quir...om. fi.ld orr.ml,y.; AV I-XIAC-16A-1 CH-CLI Wfrekss Circuit Load Corlro ler FAH 2SW 25W Eeeeegoncy dad* Connectors P +' Conn*dv T 'T' Connector IL 'C C -- -'-r t .I'r-,�rssur Y `P Comeau 2 -2' Car.rclor Due. to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without notice. t0643 W. Airport Boulevard, Suite t400 I Houston, Tex 1 713389-5680 solesr?slgus. om PtJ* 2/.0 112022 Spring lighlnl Group. Jil Rghts Reared OES1GN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS HOUSFNG (CT AND CRI Anodized aluminum extruded body Selectable 3000K/350OK/4000K CCT; Standard SO CRI, AMBIENT TEMPERATURE LENS Suitable For use in 0°C to 40°C (32°F to 104°F) Standerc Flat Lens MOUNTING FINISH Pendant Mount Standard White and Black housing in stock- Custom finishes available. EFFICACY Up to 100 Lm/W ELECTRIC 120V Far connections up to 401-t. 277V for connections up to 1QOft_ Standard 1-10V Dimming. Power Factor >0.9, THD <20%. DIutE'SIO1S WARRANTY 5-year limited warranty. Please visit www,slgus_coni for cornplele warranty term_ CERTIFICATIONS UL Listed for damp location, 2 FT AFT L 2_B2" L47.44" 1:1[TH3A6' W2.34" L 94,69" 8FT Dui fee continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change witlwgt notice. 10643 W. Airwrt 9aularuri, Suite t400 I Ihhesten, Tex 1 713389-5680 selesr?slgus.mm Pcpjs <fv s kPm1.21.03 1131122 Spring lighin! Gimp. /1l Rights Reared OES1GN SERIES -90 PHOTOMETRIC -f+180 •1$p 401111111M1111,1 50 -120 120 at *moo A WI i ijoilk 1111Wo. Atamoili fpf#414 Mute Vat* 44•iri - COfl90.360 Uso. 3 7 ' -30 -PI ri30-C60/2,40.360• - C90J270.364' 0 AVERAGE BEAM FANG LE(5C?96}: 360 ZONAL FLUX DIAGRAM 2m 3m 4m 5m AVERAGE ILLUMINANCE CURVE 2115.063.3i n L 69.37, 215.a u 273.V8cn1 558.95cm 30.133, 95.921 K 1338.43cm 17.34.53.954 x 1 117gi <r., 1110L3 sax 1397.3 oh Height Ear$ Erne. Angle: 10882deg D etreter' Note The CiMireS intlirahe the Illumnaten area 211d the average luminad 1 when the Iuminaire is ae tllMarant distance. T CO C95 C90 C135 C100 C225 C270 C315 5 957 7 458.1 847.3 1341 0 061.4 1353.7 848.1 856.1 10 844-1 1349.1 635.1 821.8 851.1 1334.3 637.7 851.1 15 822.1 831.6 815.6 795.4 633.5 617.4 819.0 639.E 20 732.8 807.2 766.8 762.5 807.4 783.9 792.8 620.2 25 757.1 775.5 755.5 723.0 779.6 753.2 760.5 793.2 30 716.2 737.2 715.9 677.7 735.6 7117 721.7 759.2 35 667 9 693.4 6702 627.5 690.3 664.2 676.4 719.2 40 516.1 694.0 619.9 572.8 639.9 611.7 626.2 673.2 45 559.4 589.1 564.3 513.7 585.0 559.E 571.2 621.7 50 999.2 530,9 505 4 451.3 525.8 993.6 511.7 565.9 55 434.1 466,3 441.5 395.1 462.7 928.9 440.0 S05.6 60 365.3 402.1 374.7 315.6 395.8 360.6 361.1 441.0 55 295.4 332.9 305.0 244.5 326.8 2896 310.4 373.2 70 224.4 260.6 232.0 174.7 259.3 217 5 233.6 302.7 75 159.3 189.1 101.3 106.6 189.1 147 3 166.8 230.2 30 90.07 120.5 95.53 51.77 117.0 83.82 99.31 159.1 85 36.95 60.38 41 01 10.68 S0.12 32.36 43.08 93.01 90 39.69 99.99 5.334 21.91 41.89 11.60 S.515 61.74 DEG LUMINOUS INTEMSffY:{Q COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY T 4'24r1e 4.total 4fhlifiljarnp 0-5 20.42 29.42 0.43,0.4.3 5-10 60.56 60.98 1.71,1.71 10.15 913.57 179.6 3.74,3.74 15-20 133.1 312.7 6 6,6,6 20.25 163.1 475.9 10,10 25-30 187.6 663.4 14,14 30-35 205.7 469.1 18.3,113.3 35-40 217.0 1086 22.9,22.9 40-95 221.2 1307 27.6,27.6 45-50 210 2 1525 32.2,32.2 50-55 207.9 1733 36.6,36.6 53-60 190.4 1929 40.6,40.6 641-65 167.5 2092 44.1,99.1 65-70 138.6 2230 47.1,47.1 70-75 105 $ 2336 99.3,219.3 75.60 71.76 2408 5+0.8.50.8 84-95 39.81 2448 51.7,51.7 85-90 19 41 2466 52,52 LINff: Im TWA 90% 70% 50% 30% 10% 0 P a 50% 90% 1016 50% ao% 1056 SO% ao% ••• • • • 5056 30% 1056 50% a046 1C14 0 pfc 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 0 11103 RCR:RoomCa,AtyP3t1a (CIi O 0 1Q$ 1p$ 1Q$ Q 0 a $4 99 $4 71 71 71 58 58 58 $2 1.0 9u 90 $6 87 03 80 74 71 69 62 60 58 51 50 46 y3 2.0 61 75 70 75 70 65 64 60 57 54 Si 49 44 92 40 36 3.11 71 64 58 66 60 54 57 51 97 48 44 41 39 37 34 30 4.0 63 55 49 59 51 96 50 95 90 42 38 32 35 32 29 26 6.0 56 98 42 52 95 39 45 39 35 36 33 30 31 28 25 22 6.0 50 42 36 97 39 39 90 39 30 39 30 26 28 25 22 l9 7.0 95 37 32 92 35 30 36 31 26 31 26 23 26 22 20 17 0.0 91 33 26 33 31 26 33 27 23 23 29 20 24 20 18 15 9.0 37 30 25 35 28 23 30 25 21 26 22 16 22 18 16 14 10.D1 34 27 22 32 26 21 23 23 19 29 20 17 20 17 19 12 Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates moy twinge witlwgt no , 10643 W. Airllert Boulevard, Suite t4OU I Houston, Tex 1 713389-5680 selesr?slgus.mm 118122 Spring lig51n1 Getup. /11 Rights leant Pie 5/v Sa4PM1.21.01 DES1GN SERIES DESIGN PATTERN SAMPLES 4' Continuous Run 4'x4' 2'x 8' Square Rectangle LA.CUT SKETCH CONNECTORS `•'Comredor TConnetler L'Cannedur I' (amour Layout Sketch Sdbmiatol`s are required for all custom pattern designs. Please use the grid below for your layout and include all relevant dimensions. Indicate 'L' connector with a '". NOTE: Depending on the custom design and desired shape, some configurations may require modifications. Due. Fa cordinuous product improvements, apeacation and/or equipment updates moy change without notice. 10643 W. Airport Boulevard, Suite t4OU I Houston, Tex 1 713389-5680 sulesr?slgus. om 1131122 Spring lighin! Gimp. /1l Rights Reared PROJ ECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY ti.40 LG. I_I+5 HT! N G SAL P M1 nil Slim Architectural Linear Pendant Mount The SAP M i 2,3" Slim Architectural Linear Pendant Mount is an ultra - sleek Iir hting solution that is Fully customizable to meet the unique needs of each application, The lengths come in 2 ft 4 ft, and 8 ft with selectable color temperature, wattage, and distributions. The minimalist and elegant aesthetic paired with brilliant illumination and even distribution will elevate your space in a range of applications, including offices, lobbies, and retail spaces. This versatile architectural Iuminaire possesses unlimited design potential far endless design pattern possibilities_ APPLICATIONSCommercial, Retail, Hospitality, Education, Airport, Medical, and any open spades that require a unique and elegant architectural lighting design_ OFFICE SPACES ird con 1 Cr mow= Far J*4 CATALOG #: SALF•tv11-4-L51-CSID•F•G1-FDIC-B-&1 FIXTURE TYPE: NOTES: L2 Swpwnvor Cth4 Fa Madly ;Up r,hl IED BUILTTO ORDER All orders are carefully assembled in Houston, TX, to meet the unique needs of each application and project, — —Foaww H«n,g RETAIL Due to caniinuous product improvements, specirieorion and/or equipment updates may change without notice, 10643 W..Sir_art 9aulerord, Snit 1T400 1 Ilia, Tezo; 113-389-3601 selesigslgus.com 071,12 $piilkithig Gnu JI 3i3t-seined rape 1/s *ss vii,22,b3. SSG LIGHTING DESIGN SERIES PRODUCT OPTIONS DRIVER Internal Driver Selecfoble Distribution • LENS SELECTABLE LIGHTING DISTRIBUTIONS iv • Flat Leos Direct Semi -Direct Generol Diffuse Sena -Indirect Indirect CANOPY SIZE & SHAPE MOUNTING STYLES 1-6in Round 4.5in Round Designed far power cable Drywall Ceiling w/ Internal Driver T-Grid Clips Suspends Iufni moire in T-grid. Compalihie with 9/16" and 15/16" Flat, 9/16- and 15/16+" Sloe Ceilrag Topes. Due to continuous product improvements, specification and for equipment updates may tbarmge without notice. 10643 W. Airport 9eulerort Suite MOO I Ilwstau. Texas ( 713-309-4600 I saksittligus.nom Ian inrGawp)11YAW&amet Pr.p 2/6 iaLPM 1.22.03- SSG LIGHTING DESIGN SERIES ORDERING GUIDE The Ordering Guide is not complete without filling out the Layout Sketch located on pegs 6. If you have any questions, please contact sales. Lanni nn rr- Typo= *ir idth ' Length Lumen Per Ft Inlerry:al Driver Lens Generation CCT Finish ISAILP 2.S- width Slur Archtaciurol Weer Perdue Moan! M1 Mentym2.'' #k ,;,_11w.ghh - 4 L51 5,,,,. 75a,,/ M.N., pa M ISO Inhundclrn.rrah s.1atit6l+ae.ttutemI HrtL..," G1 F$1[ I. I1 nlictua:d«t::l df140kf3.i40xfA0Cs41€ Illllank'./. . 1 OD up 90%dorm /105Wp 75 du../ / 25%up 50%down / 50% up 25%down /25`.tnp 10%dawn / 90% up t00%dawn y4 rFlock C C_,1 I am Co" u• increments 0i21441 1.4.11901. Thei 5 4LP MT is airailkritit in 2', d', and a' Innyths that can h* drrgdty ounn*ctgd tag*thher in a continuum run up to 40' (12Ov) ar 100' 1277V1. Moose 'rim that Layout 5hielich .on page 6 For hill :9ntnils. MOUNTING Coiling Plan Suspondod Lengths E Dry Well IMos•rloa.lwxl 160 80'AicnohCoble nit, it' Power Card I T1 Drop Ceiling Gins !Suitable rer #/ 16' and 15/ IA' Flat Ceiling) 11 Drop Ceiling Clips 'Suitable for /16' 'Slot Ceiling' 10 Drop Coiling Clips (Suitable for 151 r6' 51m Ceitnnt 144 11 d' A.s'ch C0710 wt lid' P '.a}r Co"d 140 240' Aircraft Cable wth 240" Rower Cord PATTERN CONNECTORS BC' t 93' Connector 'T' (aanerlar L' (gnat -tar Cootnet1Or ''Y (arlrsed r ACCESSORIES is,IFF-rd acperatcly. ncquirca RCM] nil Id crrc•r,ey.i AVI-XMAC-16A-1C1{L1 WhelessGrcui1toad Contraler EMN 21W 2SW Ertmluncy 9ae6,p Cannuchars P '�'t,paa*CrQ T T'Camec,r k 'L' CeedliC ar t 'I' C¢nixiar T 'Y' Cannadur Z '2' Crrr tclor Due to continuous product improvements, specification and for equipment updates may change without notice. 10643 titterer &ulegant Suite MOO I Noma, Taxa ( 113309-5600 TIIZZPl Spring tithing Grw1 All ifille &sent soksQtslgus.cem Pup 2/0 ALPtn1.22.03 SSG LIGHTING DESIGN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS HOUSING Anodized aluminum extruded body AMBIENT TEMPERATURE Suiiablc For use in 0°C to 40°C (32°F to 104°F) t[T AND (RI Selectable 3000K/3500K/4000K CCT; Standard 80 CR1. LENS Standard Flat Lens MOUNTING FINISH Standard White and Black housing in stock. Custom finishes available - Pendant Mount EFFICACY Up to 100 Lm/W ELECTRIC 120V For connections up to 40ft. 277V For connections up to 100ft_ Standard 1-10V Dimming, Power Factor >0.9, THD <20%. DIMENSIONS WARRANTY 5-year limited warranty. Please visit www,sIgus_com far complete warranty terms_ CERTIFICATIONS UL Listed for damp location. 2FT 4FT 8FT L 23_82" L47.1 W2.34' H 3-46' L 9L1,69" Due to continuous product improvements, specification or`d for equipment updates may cbot gas without notice. 10643111.04m [auleror& Suite MOO I Ilwstau, Texas 1 113-309-4600 1 saksittsigus.com Yif(1F1Spring lirntGrw1 All We &semi Pr.ge. 4/0 ALPM1.22.0 - SSG LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC DESIGN SERIES - f+1 80 -150 i150 #444inint -,20 Bi 6;0111044o -90 ra " 4. g i; 1 6 if $ 441.31P ll .‘0,141.1111 IICJin L SI 4.47111 _jtiii UNfr_[d r.' 04:180.364' - E30. 210 360 { -30 _ 30-C60.-2- C90:27y4.0.360360' : 0 ,AVE RAGE BEAM ANG LE(5046}: 360 " ZONAL FLUX DIAGRAM 120 7m 2m 3m 4m 5m AVERAGE ILLUMINANCE CURVE 27.1.5.9G3.31 x 279.4ecm 99.37, 215.Bi u 558.95tr, 30.93, 95.921 k 93.. ",3cr 17.34.53.954 11 11 la 3'15311, 1397. )p.,n Height Fao3 Fmz. Awe: 1113132deg Ehenete Nowt The tines Indicate the Iltjnwratcd arca and theareragc Illumination whin Ltd. lumhalre Is at detarant distance ZONALLUMEN SUMMARY T CO (45 C90 C135 C180 C225 C270 C315 7 41zone 4.total #lum,larnp 5 857 7 858,1 847.3 841.0 861,4 853,7 848.1 856,1 0-5 20.42 20 42 0.42,0.43 10 344.1 349.1 635.1 821.E 851.1 1324.3 837.7 651.1 5-10 60.56 60-38 1.71,1.71 15 622-1 331.G 615.6 795.4 633.5 617.4 919.0 639.E 10-15 96.57 179.6 3.79,3.79 20 792-6 807.2 766.8 762.5 607.4 768.9 792.8 820.2 15-20 133.1 312.7 6.6,6.6 25 757.1 775.5 755.5 723.0 779.6 753.2 760.5 793.2 20-25 163.1 475.E 113,10 30 716 2 737.2 715.9 677.7 735.6 711.7 721.7 755.2 25-30 167.6 663.9 14,14 35 6E7 9 693.9 670,2 627.5 690.3 554-2 676.4 719.2 30-35 205.7 859.1 16-3,18.3 40 516.1 644.0 519.9 572.8 639.9 611-7 626,2 673,2 35-40 217-4 1086 22.9,22.9 4S 559-9 589.1 5621.3 513,7 505.0 559-13 571.2 621.7 40-45 221.2 1307 27.6,.27.E 50 499.2 5.30,9 505 0 451,3 525,8 993.6 511,7 565,9 45-50 218 2 1525 32.2,32.2 55 434.1 468,3 441.$ 365.1 462.7 928.4 448.0 505.6 50-55 207.9 1733 36.6,36.6 60 365.3 402.1 374.7 315.6 395.8 360.6 361.1 441.0 55-60 190.9 1924 40.6,40.6 65 295.4 332.9 305.0 294.5 326.8 289_0 310.4 373.2 60-65 767.5 2092 99.1,99.1 70 229A 260.6 232.0 17q.7 254.3 217 5 236.21 302.7 65-70 7313-6 2230 47.1,47.1 75 154.3 189.1 161.3 106.5 189.1 147 3 166.8 230.2 70-75 1135.8 2336 99.3,99.3 80 90.07 120.5 95.53 51.77 117.0 83.62 99.31 153.1 75-80 71.7E 290E 50.8,50.8 85 36 95 60.38 41.01 10.68 58.12 32.86 93.08 95.01 80 5 39.61 2449 51.7,51.7 85-90 90 39.69 49.44 5.334 21,91 41.39 11-60 5.515 61.74 1$,4l 2965 52,52 UNIT: Iris DEG LUMINOUS INTEtJSITY:cd COEFFICIENTS OF UTILIZATION( PI:{ 608E 7091. 504E 304E 10% 0 124dr 5041, 307E lash 509h 30% 10% 509E 30% .. 4 • • + 509E 309E 10% 517e, 30% 10% 0 pope 20% 2041a 20% 20% 20% 0 FCR RCR:Room Cautte Ratio rCrJ) 00 106 153 103 0 0 0 64 64 94 71 71 71 56 58 56 52 1.0 99 90 06 07 83 80 74 71 69 62 60 56 51 50 46 9:3 2.0 61 75 70 75 70 65 64 64 57 So 51 48 49 92 40 36 3.6 71 64 55 65 60 54 57 51 97 48 94 41 39 37 34 30 4.0 63 55 49 53 51 96 54 95 90 42 38 32 35 32 29 26 5.0 56 98 42 52 95 39 45 33 35 36 33 30 31 28 25 22 6.0 50 42 36 97 39 34 90 39 30 39 30 26 26 25 22 19 7,0 95 37 32 92 35 30 36 31 26 31 26 23 26 22 20 17 6.0 91 93 28 36 31 26 33 27 23 26 21 20 24 20 713 15 3.0 37 30 25 35 28 23 30 25 21 26 22 16 22. 18 16 19 10.0 34 27 22 32 26 21 26 23 19 29 20 17 20 17 79 12 Due to continuous product improvements, specification and 'or equipment updates may change without notice, 10643 W. Airport hula/art Saha MOO I Ilustau, Texas I 713-309-5600 I saks8slgus.tam :.071F15pring lishing Gimp. All We test hgaS/1 SA01,51.22.0 - SSG LIGHTING DESIGN SERIES DESIGN PATTERN SAMPLES 4' Continuous Run 4'x4' 2`x8' Square Rectangle LAYOUT SKETCH CONNECTORS `*' Counedor T Cannerlur `I' (anew Layout Sketch 5ubrniital `s are required for all custom pattern designs. Please use the grid below for your layout and include all relevant dimensions. Indicate ' ' connector with a 'I". 2 ft i 11, NOTE Depending on the custom design and desired shape, some configurations may require modifications. r- Due to continuous product improvements, specification and for equipment updates may change without notice, 10643 W. Airport 9eulerurd. Suite MOO I Homo, Texas I 713-309-5600 I saksittligus.com TIZ Spring limpGrw1 An YAW tit Pngn 3f 7 SaLPM1.22.0 - LITECONTROL DATE: making light work- TYRE: I-3 LOCATION: PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4L-P-D MOD" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT FEATURES • Variable Intensity technology provides a range of specifiable outputs and resulting fixture wattages . 2 SDCM color consistency End cap design eliminates visible diffuser seams/gaps CONTROLS ' DISTRBt1TED- ii1extra$ nc r r. ra_u 1- SPECIFICATIONS CO N STR U CT ION • t-C.U5 rCistructed from extruded aluminum • End ceps constructed Pram die cast aluminum with magnetic interface • End caps overlap diffuser at each fixture end 7,3 elimate gaps and LED visibility OPTICAL PERFORMANCE • 2 SDCM co or consistency. 50 or 90 CRI . SOF: Soft diffuse acrylic lens • REG: fh' regressed softgto lens with painted steel inserts. Output multiplier (.77) • BWO: White blade baffle with saftglo Tens overlay. Output multiplier (.70) • ASYM; Asymmetric Highlytransmissive diffuse acrylic: lens with linear prisms • BAT; "Eatwing" distribution created created from highly transmissive diffuse acrylic lens with linear prisms • DRP: 1/2' protruding soft diffuse "drop" lens INSTALLATION • Suspension required at every row joint. 3164" diarrieter field -adjustable aircraft cables, ships separately • Low profile cable gripper limits visibility while providing maximum horizontal balance adjustment • Pendant locations at ends of rows (or individual fixtures) are 1/2" from fixture ends • Pendant attachment allows for horizontal adjustment to 'fine-tune" side -to -side leveling . Illuminated corners available in 90% 120% 15°- One piece construction, ready to install, with diffusers that match adjoining fixtures_ Corner system connectors must be used to form patterns, The length Of each outside or inside illuminated corner is 12' CATALOG #: 4L-P-D-3-03-SOF-C1-35Kd11OO-QO1 ME RELATED PRODUCTS B 2L-P-17 8 3L-P-D 8 6L-P-D INSTALLATION (CONTINUE)) - Square and Triangle non -illuminated connectors match future width for COntinuOu5 IOOk - Fixture weight 3lbs/ft ELECTRICAL - Variable Intensity (VI) technology allows precise Specification Of fixture Output/ wattage. Fixture will be programmed and labeled to specification. Indirect and direct hemispheres Csn be independently specified • LED boards and drivers can be accessed and removed from fixture. while installed • Entire LED module can be removed and replaced • IC (1 Circuit) Fixture wired for a single circuit - Non -feed: 2• diameter canopy covers provided (unless 5' non -feed cover Is specified) - Feed Cord: 4-wire. 7 amps max 5•wrre, 5 amps max Emergency Battery IOW battery powered driver_ Provides a minimum of 90 minutes of emergency lighting, Inverter -Compatible. Provided by others_ Available in 4'+' fixtures CONTROLS Sensors install between diffusers . NX Distributed Intelligence": Supports indoor and outdoor applications. wired, wireless and hybrid networked NX lighting control deployments and enabled emerging applications, such as Hubbell Lighting's SpectraSync" Color Tuning Technology 5pectra5ync" Color Tuning Technology: Control your space based on the needs of the application, specific activities thrOuyhOut the day and preferences of the occupants SERVICE PROGRAMS s� CERTIFICATIONS • DLC° {DesignLights Consortium) Qualified - see www_designlights_org • C5A listed for darnp location IBEW • AF of L • UL924 This product qualifies as a "desIgnated country construction material' per FAR 52,225-11 Buy American -Construction, Materials under Tirade Agreements effective 8C14t2020_ See Buy American Solutions. Contact factory for configurations including SpectraSync:, NX, or sensors_ WARRANTY • LED boards - 5 years • LED drivers (standard) - 5 years • LED drivers (Citron) - 3 years • See www.litecantroLcom for details KEY DATA Lumen Range Per Foot D: 300 -1100 Wattage Range Per Foot 2.6-10.0 Efficacy Range (LP'W) 110-118 Rated Life (Hours) L70: >61,000 L90. >6000 A81 W01OHd SJCVIMv JO T VNOISN riC0 $ cil HS) D h l D C-d-11' rage ><+9 P.p. 012321 4L-P-k 0 2021 Lltec r r41 a Ow sion of HUbMeI Lighting. InC SpeCth bons Sutiect 14 change WItI xi1 nctiCti 65 Spring Street Plyrnplpn, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 MOO r imabage wino Iitecontroi corn HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL makIng right work` DATE: TYPE: I-3 LOCATION: I PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MOD- 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT ORDERING GUIDE CATALOG # 4L-P-D-3-03-SOF-C1-38K-0144-DO1 4L _ I l_n _I Fixture Distribution D Direct AD Asymmetric Direct Colin Ti n.oil. ,l. 'no 2 K. 10K rum' 300OK 35K 3500K 40K 5Dtt 27K9 3OK9 35K9 40Kg 50110 2230TD 2750T 27651' 4COOK 500pR3 2700K, 90 CRI1 3COOK.90 CRI 3500K, 90 CRI 4CO0l . 90 CRI SO001C, 9U CRt' 2200K 000K SpectraSync"Dim-to-Warm5 2700K-5004K SpW.ra.S'n ' Tur19ble WNW' 27001-65PPK SpeCtraSyne TLM18Ule Whites OPTIONAL NL NghtlightCPcuit Required Enter quantity. 2NL=2 nlghllight OireUttikOw EF 1CW Emergency Battery Pack Enter warily 2EF = 2 elrel gene' bageileer4,''+.n CATALOG #: 4L-P-D-3-03-SOF-C1-35Kd11O0-DO1 T DirsCt Outpu!Rt D320 300 Irnir D125 127,7, ...., D100 W2 Provide Normal and 6 err yengy.' Nlghtllght Thu lhkingg W3 Provide Normal Thu Winng Only = Service Program Ch'Urirarr 1Far a 175r or Otn'[ISMD gpfi'orts Erdunplat4L-P-D$00-SO-C1-27K-D030 1-1GUNV-FA1 Max Length In Pow 02 2', 609mn 03 3,914mm1 04 4,1219nm 05 5',1524mm 06 6',1829rnm 06 B', 2438mm I000 Dp5 DS1 DSC LEC Dial DALIP NDM Patterns <" 136 Dir11.10-OR, 0.10V SpeciraSyrrc 5% Dimming. 0-101r' 1% Dimming wJ Soft Stan. 0-10V Dim -to -Off m' Soft Sian. 0-10V HHume 1% Ecosystem LED Driver Powered by DAD (2.0)* Nan-Drnmr g CBOL Illtmnated 90' Comer Cl2OL Illirrtinaled 120' Comer C135L Illtrrinated 135' Comer Control Options'' NX Standalone NX5 Nix, FIR EtT Oocupenclr+DaylightSens* $li{1e Mourttts,e.ty 14X Networked -Wired NXE FE'S kiX. Dual Srna99PORTs" 'r NY, FIR BT Occupancy/Daylight Sensor, Side Mount, Dud SrnartP0RrsIs•41 NX Networked -Wireless NXSW NXWIreIess, PIP BT LYwpancAayllght Sensor*W"Q NXWWE NIX Nfirele3xVdgrelessEnabled' ~ NK Networked WirirdlWirelese Nx ureters, PIP BT t?cwpency+Daylifltt Sensor. Dual SmegPOPTS1RWQ (V lrebo xs, Dual S rrartPCRTs 1 NX5WD NXWWD Sensors 501 Daylight Solsor Rortuirod, Enter. quantity. 2501= 2 daylight sensorshow SO'I 044tpancy Sensor Required. Enter quantity. 2SU1= 2 occupancyserlsors/raw Direct U4ticaDistribution SOF Soft Diffuse Lens, Lambe -dal REf3 BWO ASYM BAT ARP Regressed Diffuse Lens' Blade BBHIe with OverIIyl Asymmetric Defuse Lens# s Batwng Lens Drop Lens' 1C 1 Ciraut CO2 T-Inr cip-9V16' CO3 cip-9V16'SS CI Mo:te's'Iiite ipeia_I I C2 Textured Mollie White. C3 Light $iv r C4 MachnedAJuminirn C5 Cadtoo Black C6 Textured Camera Deck CC Custom C'o'cf URN Var(ge 020V through 277v) 347 347 VCR 8,3 FA2 5uspersion Kit, FA3 Susperblrn K14219' FAA Suspension Kit, 363' Notes. 1 Not Available Will Peaerrd. 2 Must be ordered with AD. 3 Adcbienel lead erne n`df be applicable Contact factory. 4 s iht www.lteconhotconrrisiee for delals. 5 Must be ordered wiIII DOS Driver option; excludes 2' lengths and patterns. 6 5pecifeble in 50Irene ineernenrs. lOpariasiasiee the F+erTeumerr_e Dam Table for 1WI petiermetloe olTeri,g and a cephora. 7 13090 not avaiahlem7 8 Mat he ordered with 2230TD, 27513T or 2765T Option 9 Excludes EmergencyBattery Peck t`F Option. Excludes DAL, DALIP end Lunen fi_ECI Dimrnng [rivers 10 Add suffix!V ra replace ell non -feed canopy covers with 5' canopy cowers. FAW - 51'suspension Ica WI 5- canoixex canopies and feed card are stippled In white reclardIgsa cif intuit pplpr onlssa oihe.wise specified. 11 EF -14W [ratter' paweied driver. Provides a minimum of 94 minutes of emergency Ighfinp. kr.arter- CampeGhle. Prrnnded by other. 12 Only applicable. when specified with Ernergennighighllight 13 Contact Fectnry for peaem configrrations. Approval drawings required 14 Includes Lumineire C'arropy t3arc NX ir•Fldue Colima Oialiamc 15 Not scalable for raw mounting. Or* erblede with 0-10V Driver aptlore. Conwet ta2t0ry i0r Lertgtl6 rexlnctlrfl 1$ Pgfer tq NX Mcgrr.;d Ca-ltrnln Rpinrars Tatar. forFun.tlpnalty gf pplgrrg. 17 NX $gnserdwith &uoIpgth, BLE prgrtlga remoteppmmlgypn pry. drkS 51 If l a--d-lb 8 Page 21518e++,1=3J21 4t-P-D C' 2021 Lltecarfrroi. a division Pt Hvbben Lighting. Inc, Spectllcatlono subject to change wabotti npgpg, 65 Spring Street Pyrnpion, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r wggsne wwnv Inecgnrol corn HUISIEIELL U®htlireg LITECONTROL making right work` DATE: LOCATION: TYPE: I-3 I PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MOD'" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT CONTROLS CATALOG #: 4L-R-D-3-03-SOF•G1-35K lJ100•DO1 NX Distributed Intelligence'" Lighting Controls: Supports bosh indoor and outdoor applications in a variety of deployment options- wired, wireless. hybrid. Integrates with and enables a wide array of luminaires including those with SpeciraSync Color Tuning Technology. „ , DISTRIBUTED - :In INTELLIGENCE NX INTEGRATED CONTROLS REFERENCE NXOption Sens tr Netwbrkahle Scheduling Occupancy Hamming Harvesting 0-10V dimming On/off Control Eluetootir App Programming NX Standalone NXS NXSMP-Shill I No I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NX Networked — Wired NXE NIA, Yes Yes No Np Yes Yes Regtlire5 NKaTCR 1 NXES N SMP-$MI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NX Networked — Wireless NXSWW NXSMP-SMI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NXWE 1 NIA Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No' NX Networked — Wired/Wireless NXSWD NXSMP-SMI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NXWD NIA Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Requires NXDTCJR t"a 1 iq 8TC Ft naedS 1.0 4e plugged- Into an er.''atlle FIX Sinai -POW' pn the Bxtur9 Meals* 2 Frogramining via Apt requires Facture assistance 3 To er grerm t114'HE oplkin need to oolault ractonr. F connected to an erea corworer, programs' ng can be done rrom'hat SoectraSvnc` Color Tuning Technology: Control you r space based on the needs of the application, specific activities throughout the day and preferences of the occupants with distinct SpectraSync" Color Tuning Technologies. SpectraSync SPECTRASYNC COLOR TUNING TECHNOLOGY Mode Kelvin Range Desaiptlon Dim to Warm 2ZOOK-3000K M mica the familiar warming effect that occurs with traditional incandescent sources as they are dimmed Tunable White 2700K•5000K 2700K 6500K Offers users the ability to tailor CCT to their personal preference. enhancing task visibility, material and colors or the aesthetics of the space Scheduled Wtlike 2700K•5000K 27O014 65001{ Mimics the rhythm of natural light or follows an alternative user -defined schedule throughout the day, enhancing an occupant's mood and well-being SpectraSv tic Tunable VdhIte Available in MO options:27a0T (270OK-500OK) Or 2765T (2700K-6500K}. Requires two 0-10V cortrolle •s, one for intensity and one for CCT. Minimum 5% dimming. 81.3Ck (HOT) White (NEUTRAL) Green (GROUND) Violet (DIMMING +) Pink (DIMMING •) Violet/White (WHfTETUNE t) Grey/White (WHRTE TUNE -) SpeciraSync Tumble 1'rhte luminaires are provided wdh two 0-10V crcuns. The violet and Font scut' for +,rinrp to any clualrled 0-10 V centrally for dimming. The vloletrwt,lte amp grey,y r,lte crcuit is for wiring to atat guelified 0-16V cantrdler for Tunable White CCT conlroL Controller Manufacturer Data SpectraSync Tunable White was designed to be used with sinking style dimmers (provided by others) and is compatible with: • Hubbell Control Solutions (HCS): NX Distributed Intelligence'" Room Controllers (NXRC) and In -future Controllers [NXFM) • Lutron: DVTV, DVSTV, and NFTV dimmers • Waltstopper. ADF120277 and CD4BL (Titan) dimmers COlor Tuning Rale r It -€W.re1I aping uO!leoiIddV utsasaa XN airr4pala XN 8 3Wi5eip d5 aprti suopiOS XN g page 3a09 1 ,12r23121 0 2021 Lite€ontirol. a division pi Hubbeu Lighting. Inc. Specdl otlons sMject to change wanotR +j1.-P-tt 65 Spring Street Plyrnp10n, MA 02367 r Tel 384294 MOO r watlane wrrw llte€ontrol corn rnnou I HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL makIng light work` DATE: TYPE: I-3 LOCATION: I PROJECT IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MOD'" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT CATALOG #: 4L-P-D-3-03-5OF-C1-35Kd11O0.DO1 PERFORMANCE DATA TABLE The tablle below Shows the delivered lumens for the various lumen outputs, Use this chart in connection with the output multiplier Capability to deliver any Output required. Nomenclature Lumens/Ft WJPt Efficacy D030;mire cos Go40 DCW5 oosa 0055 o e60 0955 13075 O 080 O 0a5 0090 0095 0100 0105 0110 {rne>4 t++Bttage irmy vary up to 9k. iron pu41611e4E Dawnlipht 300 2.6 113 50 3.0 11 400 3.4 113 450 32 115 500 42 113 550 4.7 117 e00 5.1 11. 650 5.6 116 7;10 63 116 750 6.5 115 600 7.0 1r5 650 7.5 1A 900 7.9 113 950 3.5 1000 9.0 1050 1100 Output Restrictions Driver options lisied below are not available for the Output and length as shown. 112 112 10.0 110 Restrictions - Direct Ler'nylh #eel} 2 3 5 5 a Output LPA 300� LEL DAL1, 347V 1ALI, 347V 40D I 450 LEC, CALL 347V DMA 347V DALI, 347V OAU.347v 500 DALI, 347V 950 1000 LEC LEC LEC LEC LEA LEE Output Multiplier Table PhataiumetrIcs for the 4L are published here at a nominal 3500K temperature_ This table may be used to approximate the lumen values at different K€lvir temperatures. Power CCrnSumption would stay the same. LEC LEC LEC LEC LEC LEC Option 2700K 3000K 3500K 4000K 5000K 2700K 90 CRI 3000K 90 CRI 3500K 90 CRI 40001E 90 CRI 5000K 90 CRI SOF 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 RE3 0,73 0,75 0.77 0.79 0,81 0,64 0.65 0.68 0,69 0,72 EIWO 0.67 0.69 0-70 0.72 026 0-63 0.53 0.47 0.42 0.39 ASYM 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 GAT 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 DRP 0,95 0,98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0,90 0,93 LPAD 0,86 0,88 0.90 7 0.93 0.95 1 0.75 0.77 0,79 0,31 0,84 Pigs A1j rLgv,1 3/21 0 2021 Liteccrrrrol. a division p1 Hubbeo Lighting. Inc, $pecikat14ns Riled to ch$rnge wRhoul 65 Spring Street Pyrnpien, MA 02367 t Tel 784294 0100 t we4alle nano Iltecontrol corn r-D HU BBEELL LITECONTROL makIng light work` DATE: TYPE: L3 LOCATION: I PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MOD" 3 LEO PENDANT DIRECT DIMENSIONS s1:4' CATALOG #: 4L-R-D-3-03-SOF•G1-35K-0100•DO1 Fl .:TJR= LENGTH -12' 4 7.16' — F KC ✓ r END CAP — • INDIVIDUAL MOUNTING I// r r r// r r r r r// r r r r//•• r r// FA.UACC/F SIDE VIEW - INDIVIDUAL MOUNTED PENDANT MOUNTED FIXTURE /i 24.36.48 ,60.72 .96 FIXTURE LENGTH FIXTURE LENGTH FIXTURE LENGTH FIXTURE LENGTH V2` - MINUS 1/2" / r, r r // 1 s• 1 r// 1/ / U—FA.fACC/F u END CAP — 0 0 �}— MINUS 1L12'j r r• r r r r. .0. .0r r•/ s s r r FAIIACC INT FIXTURE INT FIXTURE FIXTURE AT END OF ROW FIXTURE AT END OF ROW suspension cable location on female end 11 I 12 1211132" 12 11 2f+32' 4S 90', 120', 13S" 2 2116• 12L) 3 3116" (3L) 4 716' (4L) 6 716"(8L) - -„I--^tiabon on male ena PATTERNS SIDE VIEW • ROW MOUNTED PENDANT MOUNTED FIXTURES ROW MOUNTING 4 25" (108mm) 4 43" (113mm) END CAP VIEW 4 5" (114mm) 1 Page 519 Rey. 12/23121 0 2N1Litecontro. a division pt HU4Ge0 Lighting. Inc, $pectlkeU4n9 Riled to change w ncit4 n4UUce 46-P-D 65 Spring Street Pyrnplpn. MA 02367 r Tel 784294 d100 r aaall9ne w .' Ilfecontro' can HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL making Hight work` DATE: TYPE: L.3 LOCA110N: I PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MUD'" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT PHOTOMETRY 4L-P-D-04-SOF-X-CX 351 -D100 CATALOG #: 4L-P-D-3-03-5OF-G1-35K- 1100-DO1 LUMINAIRE DATA POLAR GRAPH Descrlptan AL Pendant,Salt Diffuse Lens, 3500K De[wered Lumens 4000 W{ntt$ Efficacy 112. Mcuntir l Pendant ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zane 0-40 0-60 0-90 0-180 Lumens %Luminaire 47.1 804 100.0 100.0 4L-R-AD-4-X -XX-ASYM-CX-35K-D050 LUMINAIRE DATA Description 3 L Pendant, Soft Diffuse Laos. 3500K Delivered Lumens 21000 Watts Efficacy 124 M[wntia Pendent ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone 0-40 0-60 0-90 0-1 0 982.00 155&.00 2016.00 201540 % Luminaire 48.7 62.3 100.0 1000 LEGEND: 0-deg. 45-tlag: 90-1e0 POLAR GRAPH 30' 9P` 75' EO' 45' 75' 6p' 45' age 619 Rey. 12/2341 0 2021 Litecantrol. a division pf Hrv4Geo Lighting. Inc, $pectlkdt14n9 Riled t04h$nge wanovi nggcg, 4L-P-fir 65 Spring Street Pyrnpton, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r whims w w Iltecentrnl corn HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL makIng fight work` DATE: TYPE: L3 LOCATION: I PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MOD- 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT PHOTOMETRY CONTINUED 4L X-D-04-BAT-CX 35K-D100 LUMIINAIRE DATA Descrlptan A L PentlahL Balwing Lens. 3500K L3e#iweretl Lumens 4300 wrltt$ Efficacy 111 Mc3tlntir9 Prnrianr ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY 2orle 0-40 0-60 0-90 0-180 Lumens `:625.SA 305677 394.5.70 400(1172 % Luminaire 40.64 76.42 9030 1000 4L-X*D"04-DRP CX-35K-D100 CATALOG #: 21L-P-D-3-03-5OF-G1-35Kd11OO.DO1 POLAR GRAPH 1Qd 7s34 ��� 4 illir Ili ft if RNA 4 1 tlit / a+a a44b iu 4147 f1 e I r IP LUMINAIRE DATA POLAR GRAPH Description 4L Pr.nrinn-„ Drop Lc-;, 351:; 14 Derarereid Lumens 4 .1{:.!1 Watts Efficacy '10 M[wntirg Pendant ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone Lumens % Luminaira 0-40 0-60 0-90 0-160 462,08 277.68 3677.99 3969.32 40.60 70.50 92.70 100_0 K 34' veil,'WN ThC11g 41mc61W NOM.V-tea} Vreftr Ihtr 7r c„y, Henan W Any.epl5- • r251 Vaned Reg Trra.Nh Hnrzomzl Mplas 191Y - 270 i :at 0 4 1 w eir fo a - m Iwo air / *III L • 3C' wimuS plane TIvcingM1HOM1zmI l 0•-1Ag5 V'1cd Plane l'Innuch Horizontal MyealaY • 225) 're•icI Plane' inany' Ilenrt qN ancarata4' - 77a5 AS 1OS 95 T5' 6Q 3 23 Ica ea 75' de Page 7i9 Per. 1V /21 4L-P-D 0 2CP21 Lltecontroi. a dM19 on pt HIv4Gee Lighting. Inc, $pecikati4n9 9t41ect tp change wlhet.4 n4UC.Q 65 Spring Street I snlp1on. MA 02362 r Tel 784294 0100 r tiva4alle corny Iltecontrol corn HUBBIELL Lighting LITECONTROL making Sight work` DATE: TYPE: I-3 LOCATION: PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MOD'" 3 LEO PENDANT DIRECT TIh11-30 DATA COLOR VECTOR GRAPHIC Graphics sham are at 3515 — Reeererxe Ilurrin3nt Test Source COLOR CHARACTERISTICS: COLOR DISTORTION GRAPHIC • Value Ordering Code 30K 35K 40K Rf 83 82 82 R9 96 96 96 CCT (K) 3009 3494 3975 Dui 0.0009 -0.0004 -0.0003 x 0.435 0.4052 0.3814 y 0.4012 03898 0_3768 CIE Ra 83 83 84 COLOR VECTOR GRAPH ICI 30K C� 35K CATALOG #: 4L-P-D-3-03-SOF-G1-35K-131O0-D01 TEST RESULTS - 3500K Value 80+ CRI CCT (K) 3494 CIE R4 83 0 -0.0004 Rf 82 Rn 96 x 0.4052 y 0.3898 SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION: 382 430 AEI s32 s-yC 630 1.4avr[ength ,;nmJ COLOR GAMUT/FIDELITY PLOT: 140 140 120 70 732 — 3;+: - 3�1: — ant 40K SD �P BG 4: FUNky „occ R cm: 80 MINIMUM CCT 30K CRI 83 in; 82 91 97 81 82 89 84 62 13 79 79 69 84 99 35K 83 81 89 95 81 81 85 86 65 13 73 79 62 83 97 40K 82 90 94 82 82 85 87 68 17 74 80 60 84 97 ?gc 3 9 kr': 12131 01 1 D 20121 iltvcontrol. a division of HU4Gea Lighting. Inc, $peGtlkdU4n5 sullect to change wah4LR 4d-113-D 65 Spring Street Pyrnp14n. MA 02367! Tel 384294 0100 r ma4age wrnv Inecintrol corn HUBBELL Ugh:ltreg LITECONTROL makIng gghi- work` DATE: TYPE: L3 LOCATION: PROJECT IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MIDD- 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Driver D01 100%-1% dimming range. Facture will be wired for low voltage 0.10V dimming control_ DAD Dim -to -Off 100%-1% dimming range Facture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control. D05 100%-5% dimming range. Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0.10V dimming control_ Only applicable If either 2230TD. 2750T or 2765T Is selected. DS1 Soft -Start 100%-1% dimming range_ Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control. DSO Soft -Start DimOff 1 to-D0% 1% dimming range. Fixture will be wired for k wvoltage 0-10V dimming control. LEG tli-Lome 1% EcoSystem LED Driver with Soft -On, Fade -to -Black dimming technology. DALI DALI compatible. DALI P Self -Powered DAIJ bus [e.g_ DEXAL) NDM Non -dimming. Fixture will be wired for fixed light output. Rated Life Tested in accardarlce to LM79-2008 & derived from EPA TM-21 calculator L70: 260,000 (calculated per TM-21 extrapolated curve) L70: >61,000 reported per TM•21rLM80 6x's limitation) L90, 72,000 (catcu laced per TM-21 extrapolated curve) L9OE >61,000 (reported per TM-21+LM80 6x'S limitation) Rated Life (Driver' Standard =100,000 hours Lutron = 50,000 hours CATALOG #: 4L-12-0-3-03-5OF•O1-35Kd1100-DO1 Page 919 Riw.12/23121 0 2021 Lgecontrol. a gMh,7on 4'r HvLlt.ell Lighting. Inc, Specdicetions Riled to change wRhovi riutioa. 41.-Fa tr 65 Spring Street Pryrnp1i n, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r w949ne vrrrw Ilrecontrol corn HUEIEIELL Lighting LL OSLG LIGHTING DESNA SE?IFS SL Slot Recessed Linear Gen 1 Design Series SL68ft SL64ft The SL Slot Recessed Linear Gen 1 Design Series is an edge -lit panel that offers balanced illumination and imitates ihs desired aesthetic: for low -plenum applicotons. The slim and shallow frame al a depth of 2 inch is simple and stylistic_ The frosted polystyrene lens provides even and diffused ambient lighting that is glare -free. This luminaire is ovaiiable in 4 ft and 8 ft. APPLICATIONS Commercial, Educational, Healthcare Facilities, Medical, Offices, and Retail, etc, REPLACEMENT Up to 4 lamp F32T8 or 4 lamp F28T5 PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY CATALOG #: S L-6,-4-4 0-G 1 -35K FIXTURE TYPE: L4 NOTES: R Uw MPLia p: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SIZE 6" x 4' SERIES NUMBER WATT 27W LUMENS 2,754 CCT 3500K SL 6 4 30 G1 35K 6" x 4' SL 6 4 40 G 1 35K 40W 4,160 3500K 6"x8' SLEr860G135K 54W 5,508 3500K 6" x 8' SL 6 8 80 G 1 35K 80W 8,320 3500K FEATURES Driver Barr Slim Frame ORDERING UILDE EXAMPLE: SL64BOG135K Lvminoire Type Wodih S .:s _ Gmnerotion Voltage CCT Fir11SIi Opiiona SL 51 recessed L'near i!7 6 6 inch Z 4 4 {t ❑ 3O 2,754 Lumens P 6I 0 BLANK= 1210_277V Z 35K 35001E ® BLANK= White l BLANK=No Option ®40 4,160 Lumens E Er1AH-9llV=Emergency Driver 9W E 8 ❑ 60 5,508 Lumens f180 13,320 Lumens Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without notice. 10643 W. 4irart Baula•+ore1, Suite t4OO I lhustaa. leloas 713-399S690 I sul's slgus.cam TIZJ Z2 Spring lighint Getup. All Rglts!Isola Page 114 SLM22.41 OSLG LIGHTING DESIGN SERIES SPECIFICATIONS HOUSING Body corsi ;t::. of extruded aluminum. AMBIENTTEMPERATURE Suitable for use in 0"C to 40'C (32°F to 104'F) MOUNTING Recessed mounting. EFFICACY Up Co 104 lumens per watt (see individual wattage data) UT AND (RI 3500K CCT available, 80+CRI OPTICS Frosted polystyrene lens. DIMENSIONS Oft 14I1 19.7 in SL64Ft 81t WARRANTY 5-year limited worronty- Comprehensive warranty leans can be located on www-slgus.carn. ELECTRICAL High quality constant current drivers toted For 50 60Hz. Operation 120-277V input. Standard 0-10V dimming. ENERGY DATA Power factor above 90% FINISH Standard Polyester Powder White finish. Multi -stage process for superior corrosion resistance and maximum durability. CERTIFICATIONS UL Listed for damp and dry locations. FCC compliant. RoHs compliant. 1,7 in f i :1.3 in • 2-1 in 5.75 in 14 in 19-7 in r L68fi 1,7in 2,1 in 5,75 in Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without notice. 10643 W. 4irart Baule•+or , Suite MOO I tlwstea, Temas 713199-5680 1 sofas' gus.cam `1111P15ping Uphill! Getup. All !gins !Isola Page 2/4 SLM22.01 0 SLG LIGHTING MiTirW PHOTOMETRIC DATA CANDLEPOWER DISTRIBUTION Vertical ' Horizontal ° 0° 45° 90' 45 ° 675 657 639 65° 369 341 483 75° 203 169 309 85 ° 62 35 7 SL 6 4 30 G 1 35K Lumens: 2,754 Lumens Rower 27W Effta y: 102 Im/W CANDLEPOWER DISTRIBUTION Vertical ° Florizontol ° 0° 45a 90a 45° 978 920 895 65 ° 531 477 676 75 ° 288 237 433 85 ° 85 49 10 L6d40 G1 35K Lumens, 4r160 Lumens Power: 40W Efficacy: 104Im W ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone Lumens %Fixl 0-30 774 28.10 0-40 1267 46.00 0-60 2210 80.30 0-90 2753 100-00 ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY I Zone Lumens 0-30 832 %Fixt 20.60 0-40 1872 45.70 0-60 3328 80.10 0-90 4160 100-00 Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without notice. 10643 W. 4irart Baula•+ore1, Suite l400 I lieustaa, Texas 713-399-5690 1 sukasi slgus.cam `YIY11P1 Spring lighint Gimp. All Rglts lemmd Page 314 SLM22.01 0 SLG LIGHTING DESIGN SERIES LUMEN AMBIENT TEMPERATURE (LAT) MULTIPLIERS Ambient Temperature Lumen Multiplier 0°C 32°F 1.04 5°C 41 °F 1.04 10°C 50°F 1.03 15°C 59°F 1.02 20°C 68°F 1.01 25°C 77°F 1.00 30°C 86°F 0.99 35°C 95°F 0.PS 40°C 104°F 0.97 PROJECTED LED LUMEN MAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL DATA Watt Current (A) 120V 208V 240V 277V 27W 0.23 0.13 0,11 0.10 40W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 54W 0.45 0.26 0,23 0,19 80W 0.67 0.38 0.36 0.29 Operating Hours 0 25,000 50,000 100,000 Lumen Maintenance Factor 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.96 Due to continuous product improvements, specification and/or equipment updates may change without notice. 10643 W. 4irart Baula•+ore1, Suite 6400 I Iaustae, Texas 713189-5680 I sokas slgus.cam `Y1111P15ping Uphill! Gimp. Jil Itglts lemmd Page 4, 4 SLM22.01 LITECONTROL making light work - DATE: LOCATION: TYPE: L5 I PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4L-F-[ MOD'" 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT FEATURES • Variable Intensity technology provides a range of specifiable outputs and resulting fixture wattages • 2 SDCM color consistency • End cap design eliminates visible diffuser seams/gaps CONTROLS DISTR 211TEd- extra$ nc P. IN IL r.i:.r1_r :a ,1-va;. SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION • Housing ccntructed glom die -formed and welded steel with wiring knockouts in top ▪ End caps constructed from die -formed steel. Installs from below via magnetic interface • End caps overlap diffuser at each fixture end to elimate i; p5 irid LED visibility OPTICAL PERFORMANCE • 2 SDCM coior consistent, 30 or 90 CRI • SOP: Soft diffuse acrylic lens • REG;' " regressed softglo lens with painted steel inserts. Output multiplier (.77) • i3WO; White blade baffle with softglo Lens overlay. Output multiplier (.70) • AVM; Asymmetric Highly transmissive diffuse acrylic lens with linear prisms • AT: "Batwing` distribution created created from highly transmissive diffuse acrylic lens with linear prisms ▪ DPP; 112 protruding soft diffuse "drop" lens INSTALLATION PT Mounting: Continuous spackle trim with beaded edge welded to housing. Spackle trim allows plaster coat up to fixture edge for clean ceiling appearance • LGTNGJSS Mounting: Side rails provide continuous mounting, lateral spacing between T•bars and allows clearance for T-bar supporting wire. For Tegular grid mount. fixture will sit level with the T-bar OW Mounting: Side fails allow installation into drywall slot, Visible flange is located on all 4 s:des of fixture CATALOG 4: 4L-DW-Ira-12-08-SOF-C1-35K-D100-DO1-1C-UNV-W3 MQDx RELATED PRODUCTS 8 2L-R-D 8 3L-R-D 8 6L-R-D INSTALLATION (CONTINUED) • Illuminated corners available in 90",120.135"- One piece construction. ready to install„ with diffusers that match adjoining futures- Corner system connectors must be used to form patterns, The length of each outside or inside illuminated corner is 12" • Fixture weight: 3lbsfft ELECTRICAL • Variable Intensity I, VI) technology allows precise specification of fixture output/ wattage. Fixture will be programmed and labeled to specification. Indirect and direct hemispheres can be independently specified LED boards and drivers can be accessed and removed from fixture, while installed - Entire LED module can be removed and replaced • 1C (1 Circuit) Fixture wired for a single circuit - Emergency Battery_ 10W battery powered driver. Provides a minimum of 90 minutes of emergency lighting. Inverter -Compatible. Provided by others- Available in 4'+' fixtures CONTROLS • Sensors install between diffusers NX Distributed Intelligence": Supports indoor and outdoor applications. wired. wireless and hybrid networked NX lighting control deployments and enabled emerging applications, such as Hubbell Ligtlting's 5pectra5ync" Color Tuning Technology SpectraSyne Color Tuning Technology: Coritrpl your space based On the needs Of the application, specific activities throughout the day and preferences of the occupants SERVICE PROGRAMS s� CERTIFICATIONS DLC* (DesignLights Consortium) Qualified - see www.designlights-org CSA listed for damp location • IBEW • AF of L UL924 • This product qualifies as a "designated country construction material • per FAR 52225-t1 Buy American-ConstructIon. materials under Trade Agreements effective 8114f2020. See Buy American Solutions. Contact factory for configurations Including SpectreSync, NX, or sensors_ WARRANTY • LED boards - 5 years • LED drivers {standard) - 5 years • LED drivers (Lutron) - 3 years • See www litecontrol.com for details KEY DATA Lumen Range Per Foot D; 300-1100 Wattage Range Per Foot 2,6-10.0 Efficacy Range (LPW) 110-113 Rated Life 1HOur$} L70: >61,O00 L90; 1,0O0 A81 W01OHd S JN IMV2J O IYNOISNatNC❑ dIHS-NOIt1t cr J-lb Page VO Rev 1W123121 0 2021 LIteconrirol a Oknslan ar HW4e141ghhng. Inc Specnlcabons subject 14 change Yawl rictKe 65 Spring Sheet Pryrnpien, MA 02367 ! Tel 784294 0100 r websge w.v v ntecon -oI corn HUBBELL �-- Lightirv9 LITECONTROL making light work' DATE I LOCATION: LG TYPE: PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4L-R-D MOD'" 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT ORDERING GUIDE CATALOG 4 4L-DW-D-12-SDF-C1-35K-D100-DD1-1C-LfNV-W3 DW Eryi+rI Pry Drywall with planter trim Qdrnless finish) LG 15116Grid NG 955 Grid SS 955 Screw Slot F: ni:-'Crd:,r" CI Matte WI1kg Pefaulli C2 Teeth red Matte White C3 Light Silver C4 Mathined Nurninura C5 Carbon Back C6 Textured Ca mein Black CC CuStOin Color OPTIONAL NL NigkltlightCbcuit Required Enter quantity. 2NL=2 ntghllgptt ClrgttlIVOw 1 Asymmetric Direct CATALOG #: 4L-DW-I3-12.-08-SOF-C1-351C-D 100-1T141-1 C-IiJN V-W3 = Service Program Row Length (Ir Feetl 12" Erne ,n foot increments ..:+Inc r,rr nroi-i cc. 27K 2700K3 3G1DOK 35041C 404( 4000K 50K 5000K5 2710 2700K, 90 CRI5 30K9 3000K, 90 CRI 35K9 3500K.90GRt 4131€9 400014,9042I 50K9 5000K 90 CRI5 2230TD 2200{-3000KSpectaSyrrr"Din-to-Ware 2750T 2700t<-5000K 5pecva5lmc" Tunable White 7 2755T 2700K 50014 Speclra5ync Tuleble vmile' EF 10WEmergency Battery Pack Enter warily 2EF = 2 errer gency t>atteileS+rOw. Thru-wiring WI No Thru Wire W2 Provide Normal and 6 nmt, yencyf Nlglxbht Trim W3 Provide Normal Thou Wring Oriy GSM Click km filar a NI' oropfiws Example; 4L-DW-D-8-.3-08-$OF-C1-27K-D030-D01-iG-UINv Row Length Adder' 3 R_w length *3' _6 Row length +6' _9 Row length +9' Measured in inches Direct Output+ri' D030 303 [mire D125 1250 (max) D100 Patterns f " C90L Illlmineted90'Comer C120L Illlmineted 120' Comer CI35L Illlmineied 135' Come, Control Options' NX Starrdalana NXS N7f, PIP BT OccupencylDtvytgtlt Sensor, Slide Mount ri NX Networked —Wired rvE NK. Dual SrriarlPORTs1' NXES NK. PIR 0T :1CCupanCy+DBA'19r't 59nS0r, Slide Mount 1EXEM 5marIPORTS'-* MXNetworked —Wireless NXSW NX Wreless, FIR BT Occupan Daylight Sensor '4' XWE NX WirelessW1re1ess En' 51 NX Networked — Wired/Wireless WSW D NIVAID 5en904s 5D1 SOl SZ1 t47f Wreless, PIR BT Occupanc 1 ayligtlt Sen oc Dual SrmartPORTsw.w‘g NX Wireless, Dual SrnanPORTs' " DaylghtSerispr Required. Faterguanitty MI' 2daylgte rrorghow Occupancy Sensor Redd red. Enter quantity. 2501= 2 occupancy sensorshaw Z Raft M6dt12Reguied. Enter pWnlity.25Z1=2radio modlieskuw.Radio contras up o 10 amens_ Must be ordered with 1i00_ 02 03 04 05 06 2', E+39 rrrr 31,914 men 1219mm 5..1524 nrn 6',1829 men FOB 13',2438ram D01 1% Dmmring, cowl D D05 1'A Dtrr40-0ff.0-10V SpectraSync 5% Dimming, 0-10V' DS1 1'% Dimming w! Soft Start, 0-10V DSO 1% dirtir-lrr0ff nn Soft Start, 0-10V LEG Hi#rnle 1% EmsySteen LED driver DAL16 Powered by Dal (2.0* NDM Nan -Dimming GAUP Direct Optical Distribution SOF Soft Defuse Lens. Larrbenien REG Regressed diffuse Lens 13w Dade Mlle winOverlfiyx ASYM Asymmetric Diffuse Ler6 '4 BAT Batwing Lens DRP DropLens'ra CCEA C1litago Environmental Air Moditcaticn 1111 UNV Untveraal Voltege (120V through 277.4 } 347 347Malt n Netes: 1 Opting type can rqt be rettati-a0 the 1i21C. 2 Excluded ildirridud tl rnouit 3 Not Available with Patterns, 4 Mist be &rdered with pD. $ AdlliOnal lead Erne may be epplcable OOrtaci factory 6 %fiat Mw.ltecurnroI com'Yris'res rot derail 7 rrkistbeOrdered wryh d4$ Cover gpibrC enkides2'wools and patterns 8 Spetfidble in 501unen intrer ire. e3. Rererente the Peri&rrn9r)oe Dea Tsule far lull perr&inente offeritg anO en43101Vre. 9 MOngtavatebleIn2 14 M st be ordered with 2230TD, 2750T or 2765T Option 11 Excludes Emergency Battery Pack'EP Upton. Excludes 0ALt DAUP and Lutrnn {LEII among Driers 12 EF -10W bairerypor eeed driver. Provides minimum or 94 minutes or emergency Ighhng. krreiter- CampaGNe. Provided by others. t3 Drily approakrle when specified with Ennergem3nTYghalght 14 Contact Factory tor pattern oar figurations. Appror al drawings required Nx rn#IxGmro %calm% OptionE 15 1,knr ,.wiabie nor row rriconenq tnIy available wei 0-14W Driver bplbr4. Contact ralim iqr Length restricrims. 16 Refer Oa NIX r,legra?ed Coitrcts Re'ererce Irene for Functionality cr Optiord. 17 NX $enf0r5 01116luelbrith.13LE provbes remote commission Orly. aws)lD W 8 2r9 R.w.12 23/21 0 2021 Lltecontrol, a dtv`sran P1 Hvbben Lighting. Inc, $pesllicdtIOns st4leGt to change wthotR nodes, 4L47-D 65 Spring Street Pryrnpipn, MA 02367! Tel 734294:0100 r websiIe wrnv Iltecin¢pl corn HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL making light work' DATE TYPE: L5 LOCATION: IPROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4L-R-D MOD'" 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT CONTROLS CATALOG #: NX Distributed Intelligence- Lighting Controls: Supports bosh indoor and outdoor applications in a variety of deployment options- wired, wireless. hybrid. Integrates with and enables a wide array of luminaires including those with SpeciraSync Color Tuning Technology. „ , DISTRIBUTED - :In INTELLIGENCE NX INTEGRATED CONTROLS REFERENCE NX Option Sensor N tworkatlle Scheduling Occupancy Daylight Harvesting 0-10V Dimming On/off Control Eluetootir App Programming NX Standalone NXS NXSMP-SMI I No I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NX Networked - Wired NXE N/A, Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Requires NX;6TC/R 1 NXES N $MP -$MI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NX Networked - Wireless NXSWW NXSMP-SMI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NXWE 1 N/A Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No' NX Networked - Wired/Wireless NXSWD NXSMP-SMI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NXWD NIA Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Requires NXDTCJR t"a 1 ig 8TCFt naedS 1.0 lie plugged Into an &.' lours FIX SinaiPPOW'pn the anvil? Medlar 2 Fragrarnrntorn via Apr} requires Facture assistance 3 To eregrenl rd1PHE oplkin need to oonault ractonr. !' connected to an Sea corworer, programs' ng can be done has Mar SgectraSvnc` Collor Tuning Technology: Control you r space based on the needs of the application, specific activities throughout the day and preferences of the occupants with distinct SpectraSync" Color Tuning Technologies. SpectraSync SPECTRASYNC COLOR TUNING TECHNOLOGY Mode Kelvin Range Eiesaiptlon Dim to Warm 2 ZOOK-3000K M mica the familiar warming effect that occurs with traditional incandescent sources as they are dimmed Tunable White 2700K•5000K 2700K 6500K Offers users the ability to tailor CCT to their personal preference. enhancing task visibility, material and colors or the aesthetics of the space Scheduled Wtlike 2700K•5000K 2700K 6500K Mimics the rhythm of natural light or follows an alternative user -defined schedule throughout the day, enhancing an occupant's mood and well-being SuectraSvnc Tunable VdhIte Available in MO options: 2 7,0T (27OOK-5000K) or 2765T (2700K-6500K}. Requires two 0-10V cortrolle •s, one for intensity and one for CCT. Minimum 5% dimming. 81.3Ck (HOT) White (NEUTRAL) Green (GROUND) Violet (DIMMING +) Pink (DIMMING .) Violet/White (Whin TUNE t) Grey/White (WHRTE TUNE -) SpeciraSync Tumble 1'rhte luminaires are provided wdh two 0-10V crcurls. The violet and Font arcuil kir+,rinrp to any clualrled O-IOV controller for dimming. The vloletMrule and grey,y nits crcuit is rot Wring *OM qualified 0-16V cantrtreller for Tunable White CCT conlroL Controller Manufacturer Data $pe[traSync Tunable White was designed to be used with sinking style dimmers (provided by others) and is compatible with: • Hubbell Control Solutions (HCS): NX Distributed Intelligence" Room Controllers (NXRC) and In -future Controllers (NXFM) • Lutron: DVTV, DVSTV, and NFTV dimmers • Waltstopper. ADF120277 and CD4(3L (Titan) dimmers COlor Tuning Rale r w -€W.re1I aping uO!leoiIddV utsasaa XN airr4pala XN 8 3Wi5eip d5 aprti suopiOS XN g pegs 3.09 1 ,12r23121 I 2021 Llte€onfiral. a dhnaron pi Hubben Lighting. Inc, Specdl otlons Riled to change waboul n tloa. 65 Spring Street Plynrp1 n, MA 02367 r Tel ?Ea294 0100 r wabalfe www llte€ontrol corn riinou I HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL making Night work. DATE TYPE: IS LOCATION: IPROJECT: 4L-R-D MOD'" 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT CATALOG #: PERFORMANCE DATA TABLE The tablle below shows the delivered lumens for the various lumen outputs, Use this chart in connection with the output multiplier Capability to deliver any Output required. Nomenclature Lumens/Ft WJFt Efficacy Downlight D030;mih) 300 2.6 118 6035 350 3.0 11 0040 400 3.4 113 C045 450 3.8 113 O 056 500 42 117 0055 550 4.7 117 O 060 500 4.8 116 DC65 650 5.6 116 ()Pp 700 6,1 11.6 C075 750 6.5 115 111000 800 7.0 1r5 D065 850 7.5 143 D090 900 7.9 1t3 O 095 950 3.5 112 D100 1000 9.0 112 O 105 1050 44 111 0110 1100 10.0 110 MatW9ema4'vary uptv5%1ronpuplshs9E Output Restrictions Driv€ r options listed below are not available for the output and length as shown. Fstrictiori5 - Direct 7 Length {fi cl 3130 LEC,CALL 347V DAU.347v Output LF t4 350 400 LEC, DRLI, 347V DAL, 347V p.4Ln, 347V 450 500 DALI, 347V DAL, 347V Output Multiplier Table Photornetrics for the 4L are published here at a nominal 3500K temperature_ This table may be used to approximate the lumen values at different Kelvin temperatures. Power consumption would stay the same, Option 2700K 3000K 3500K 4000K 50001( 2700K 90 CRI 3000K 90 CRI 3500K 90 CRI 4000K 90 CRI 5000K 90 CRI SOF 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 REG 0,73 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.81 0.64 0.65 0.68 0.69 0.72 BW0 0.67 0,69 0,70 072 0.76 0,63 0,53 0.47 0,42 0.39 ASYM 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 090 0.93 BAIT 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 DRP 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 LPAD 0.86 0.88 0.90 0.93 0.95 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.81 0.84 4(9 IHiw.1212312i 4«r} 62021 Stlighting. rodcs HUBBELL 5 Spring Street Pyrnplonn, MA 02367 / Tel8194 010wabaaw Iecora oI cLighting LITECONTROL DATE: LOCATION: making 'light work' 4L-R-D MOD'" 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT DIMENSIONS S 3F' 2W 4 s' SW 4• Pde LG/NGI55 Fixture Length DW Fixture Length 00 wo 234' PT Fixture Length din4 4 L' 46�ad464ad48464ad464ad4d464ad484ad4d464ad484ad4d464ad484ad4d464ad484ad4d464ad484ad4d464, ""01:113""o"c""a"o""""o"o""a"o""o"o"o""a"o""o"o"o""a"o""o"o"o""a"o""o"o"o""a"o""o"o"o""a"o""n"o"c 4 �51'KO —WKD Drywall 90", 120',135` 31132" OW 4 114" (4L) $ (6L) C. - k K1 I5 FOR 114 -2t1 THFEM ED ROD O -21C Dt4. FEED-IUS INDIVIDUAL MOUNTING Grid 90',120% 135' 3 1/32" (3L) 4 1 /4" (4L) 61f4" (6L) 4 - 5.0 DHL KOM FOR IAA-20THFE4DED ROD Cener Las rND05 4L-55 425" (1 mam) 4L-NG 4L-PT 1 4.4375' 13rnmj 4-25" {1 O8t11an) PATTERNS END CAP VIEW age 5i9 Prnr,13J23121 0 2021 LISecontrol. a dM19 On ar Hv4bel Lighting. Inc, $p2Gtlkdtion9 Riled t4 change wthoLR n4UCA, 65 Spring Street Pyrnp1I n, MA 02367 ! Tel 784294 0100 r 1.4050 wr w Ilteclntrol corn aai rir a HUE E3EILL Lighting LITECONTROL DATE LOCATION: ma It I ng 11g ht work' 4L-R-D MOD'" 4 LED RECE55FD DIRECT PHOTOMETRY 4L-R-D-O4-SOF- C 3SK D100 LUMINAIRE DATA Description 4L Recessed, Soft Diffuse Lens, 3500K Cefvered Lumens 4000 Wrt5 Efficacy 112 Mounting Rnc4LSod ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone 0-4t 0-60 0-90 ❑-180 Lumens % Luminairla 1885.60 3214.60 4000.10 4000.1D 47.1 80.4 1000 100_0 4L-R-AD- X-XX-ASYM-CX-35K-D050 LUMINAIPE DATA C sC ippipn 4L Red. srt DIffu Lens. 3500K Cefvered Lumens 2000 Watts Efficacy 124 Mc jnting R4i4i9Rd ZONAL LUMEN SUM MARY Zone. LurThie t 0-40 0-80 c-90 0-180 982.00 1E 8.00 2016.00 2016.00 % Lultiinteire 48,70 8230 100.00 100.00 POLAR GRAPH r A 2250 — 0' LEGEND: 0-Oeg 45-ck g: 90-deg: POLAR GRAPH 15' tf LEGEND o-clog 50-deq Iso-tlag 91Y 75' E6' 45' age 619 Rev.12/23d21 0 2021 LItecor- roi. a dhil9ion Qf Hlvbtiee Lighting. Inc. Specifications soiled to change vAnclu1 n4die 65 Spring Street Py npion, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r tivabsne www Inecontrol can I-IURBELL Lighting LITECONTROL DATE LOCATION: r i kl ng light work' 4L-R-D MOD'" 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT PHOTOMETRY 4L-X- D-0 4-BAT-CX-3 5 K- D100 LIMO INAIRE DATA Description 94 Recessed, eaiwing Lens. 3500K ❑eivered Lumens 4000 W8rt5 EffiC4Cy till Mounting € nronsr.d ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone Lumens %Luminaire 0-40 1625.84 40.64 0-60 '3056.77 76.42 0-90 s{341L.20 985.0 13-186 4060.17 100_0 4L-X-D-04-DRY'-C. 35 -D100 POLAR GRAPH ic fiela air . ., ,„. , 46‘7,4 '4* iios. vvycr Puna Tha'y' nnfzmwl 4.^44/.0-141// Vancal Maris l'hoongh Hanzmrzl Myas}iS . 73SF ✓ ericrl Plane Tlroup1 Ho zonal Mpcsry4' Z70y LUM!NAIRE DATA POLAR GRAPH Description AL Recessed, drop Len- s. 3500K Detiwered Lumens 4006 WiiSR Efficacy i10 Mounting Recessed ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zane 0-40 0-60 0-90 0-193 Lumens 1E13.pQ 797.9 3577,99 3969.32 % Luutini:re 40.60 70.50 92.70 100_0 b):" - 4 ' 1 ._ W di - 111* , 1111‘, , ii10‘ *w * v ,L ao' verwi pied, Tlra'y' FrmcmW Mgi siP'-mod', ✓ isI Pik.r Tenannn HymanW AnycGMS . Y351 ✓ arictl Pima TFrocgh Hamm! Mprs {9Q' - 276} 46 uTi rus 9IT n r,0 rtff ros 99r COT age 7/9I 12.123/2i 0 2021 Lltecantrd, a dM9lon pJ Hv4Gel1 Lighting. Inc, $pecdicat14n5 Riled to change wRhoLR nggC.Q 4t.14 65 Spring Street Pynnpipn, MA 02367! Tel 784294 0100 r weime wr w Iltecintrol corn HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL DATE: LOCATION: ma ItImggU ht work' 4 L D MOD'" 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT TIM-30 DATA COLOR VECTOR GRAPHIC Graphics shorty are at 3515 — Reeererxe Ilumnam Test Source COLOR CHARACTERISTICS: COLOR DISTORTION GRAPHIC • Value Ordering Code 30K 35K 40K Rf 83 82 82 96 96 96 CCT (K) 3009 3494 3975 Dui 0.0009 -0.0004 -0.0003 x 0.435 0.4052 0.3814 y 0.4012 03898 0_3768 CIE Ra 83 83 84 COLOR VECTOR GRAPHIC. 30K C� 35K 40K TEST RESULTS - 3500K Value 80+ CRI CCT (K) 3494 CIE R4 83 0 -0.0004 Rf 82 Rn 96 x 0.4052 y 0.3898 SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION: 382 430 AEI 51.2 S-ib 630 1.4avr[ength ,;nrni COLOR GAMUT/FIDELITY PLOT: 140 140 120 110 — 70 Sp cm: 817 MINIMUM CCT 30K CRI 83 — 3;+: - 3�1: — ant in; 732 82 91 97 81 82 89 84 62 13 79 79 69 84 99 35K 83 81 89 95 81 81 85 86 65 13 73 79 62 83 97 40K 82 90 94 82 82 85 87 68 17 74 60 60 84 97 ?gc 3 9 kr': 12131 01 1 D 2Cal Litecontrol. a division of HU4Gea Lighting. Inc, $peGtlkdU4n5 SU4fect to change wthout ad-P-f 65 Spring Street Plyrnplon. MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r wehsge wrnv Iitecontrol corn HUBBELL L.URhtli rag LITECONTROL DATE: LOCATION: ma ItImg. IFght work' 4L D MOD- 4 LED RECESSED DIRECT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Driver i2,01 i00%-1% dimming range. Facture will be wired for low voltage 0.10V dimming control_ D0.0 Dim -to -Off 100%-1% dimming range Facture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control. D05 100%-5% dimming range. Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0.10V dimming control_ Only applicable If either 2230TD. 2750T or 2765T Is selected. p51 Soft -Start 916.1 100% dimming range_ Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control. DSO Soft -Start Dimto-Off 100%-1% dimming range. Fixture will be wired for k wvoltage 0-10V dimming control. LEC Eli -Lome 1% EcoSystem LED Driver with Soft -On, Fade -to -Black dimming technology. DALI DALI compatible. DALI P Self -Powered DAIJ bus [e.g_ DEXAL) NDM Non -dimming. Fixture will be wired for fixed Tight output. Rated Life Tested in aCCOrdariCe to LM79-2006 & derived from EPA TM-21 C21Culator L70: 260,000 (calculated per TM-21 extrapolated curve) L70: >61,000 reported per TM.21rLM80 6x's limitation) L90, 72,000 (catcu laced per TM-21 extrapolated curve} L9OE >61,000 (reported per TM-21LM80 6x'S limitation) Rated Life (Driver' Standard =100,000 hours Lutron = 50,000 hours Page 919 Rey.12/23121 0 2021 Lgecontrol. a dM 9on 4'r HvLltlell Lighting. Inc, Specdicetions wiled to change wthout n4dC.Q +t��t-t;••r 65 Spring Street Pyrnp1pn, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r w949ne www Iitecontrol corn HUBEIELL Lighting TYPE LC LITECO TL making light work 22L-W-1 zz LEA Wall Indirect Fixture Type: LC Project [lame: IOWA CONSERVATORY Ordering Guide Feature Code Mounting Fixture distribution Vplight distribution JRowkiengh (irr feet) Max length in row Firrdsli/Coiar Color temperature indirect outputift (specifiable l 50fumerrs./ftirtcremerri i Driver" Options Description 22L 100% Indirect linear W Wall Indirect LPA Law Peak Angle LPAD Low Peak Angle with Diffuser 4• 03 Enter in foot increments. Note fixture lengths below_ 3', 914mm 04 4',1219mm 06 08 lC1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 CC 6', 1829mm 8', 2438mm Matte White (Default) 1 Textured Matte White Light Silver Machined Aluminum Carbon Black Textured Camera Black Custom Color 27K 2700K 30K 3000K 35K 3500K 40K 4000K 50K 5000K' 27K9 2700K, 90 CRI' 30K9 3000K, 90 CRI 35K9 3500K, 90 CRI 40K9 4000K, 90 CRI 50K9 5000K, 90 CRI* 2230TD 2200K-3000K SpectraSync" DI m-to-Warm* 2750T 2700K-5000K 5pectraSync' Tunable White* 2765T 2700K-6500K SpectraSync—Tunable White* *Must be ordered with D05 Driver options 1030 300 11125 12501 NDM DOS [001 D51 000 DSO LEC DALI DALIP 'Additional lead time may be applicable_ Contact factory_ Page 1J6 Rev.11/13/10 Non Dimming 5% Dimming, 0-10V 1% Dimming, 0-10V Soft -Start 1% Dimming, 0-10V Dim -to -off (1%), 0-10V Soft -Start Dim -to -off (196), 0-10V Hi-lume 1% Eco5ystern LED driver DAL!' Powered DALI (2,0)' 'Must be ordered with 2230TD, 2750T or 2765T Option —"EMIlloaniumairoJ 1 Z75 LPA Key Features • Variable Intensity technology provides specifiable lumen outputhuattage • 100% indirect di5tributiorl. • 23DlMcolor variation Performance Nomenclature Lun7eimeft MESINEZIE uptight (LPA) 1030 (rain) I0s0 107s 300 500 750 2.2 34 53 140 147 143 1100 1000 7.4 136 1125 (max) 1250 10.7 117 (wattage may vary up to 5% from published) bi lib Quick Find litecontroI Loran 22L-W-I LED f 22L-W-I 2019 Litecontrcl, a dMsbn of FlubbE0 Lighifng, h,c. SpPoifications sublect to charge without notice. 66 Sprang Street F1 mpton, MA 02367 # Tel 781-294,0100 r Website www.itecnntrd.cwn HUBBELL Lightir5g LITECO TL making light work Ordering Guide (continued) arcuitl,tg Voltage Ilc 1 Circuit 1 I UNV Universal Voltage 22L-W-1 22 LEA Wall Indirect 120 120 Volt 277 277 Volt 347 347 Volt'" "Excludes Emergency Battery Pack'EF' Option. Excludes DALI, DAUP and Lutron (LTW/LEC) Dimming Drivers Optional Features Code Options Description J4ieThtFie�ht Emergencyr Mu -wiring Dust Cover Control Options NX*' Sensors' NL EF Nightlight Circuit Required_ Enter quantity. 2NL = 2 nightlight circuits/row 1 OW Emergency Battery Backup Indicate how many in the row_ Example: 2EF = 2 Emergency batteries/row *Only available in 6` & 8'_ Contact Factory for restrictions W1 NoThru Wire. W2 Provide Normal and Emergency/Nightlight Thru Wiring' W3 Provide Normal Thru Wiring Only "Only applicable when specified with Emergency/Nightlight L1 Clear Acrylic Dust Cover Lens* "Only available with LPA uplight distribution options Code Options Description NXE NX Enabled, Dual SmartPorts NXWE NX Wireless Enabled NXES NX Enabled, Dual SmartPorts, PIR Occupancy Sensor, Dimming Daylight Harvesting NX5 NX, PIR Occupancy Sensor, Dimming Daylight Harvesting (standalone) NXSW NX Wireless, PIR Occupancy Sensor. Dimming Daylight Harvesting NXWD NX Wireless Enabled, Dual SmartPORTs NXSWD NX Wireless, PIR Occupancy Sensor, Dimming Daylight Harvesting, DualSmartPORTs *Not available for row mounting Only available with 0-10V Driver options; Contact factory for Length restrictions _$O1 Daylight Sensor Required. Enter quantity. 2Sl 1= 2 daylight sensars/raw _SO1 Occupancy Sensor Required_ Enter quantity_ 2501= 2 occupancy sensors/row 'Additional lead time may be applicable_ Contact factory_ lib Quick Find litecontroLcorn Page 2/6 Rev.111113F19 22L-W-I LED f 22L-W-I o 200 Lgecontrd, a dMsbn of Hubbell Lighting, rnc. SpPcifrcatrons sublect to change wlthovt nuke. HUBBELL Lightimg 66 Sprang Street Flympton, f Q2367#Tel 781.294,0100, Websitewww.itecnntrd.cwn LITECO TL making light work Details Constructions Housing -extruded aluminum with sheet metal end headers, End caps- Sheet metal, flat style. Indirect diffuser: LPAD - Low peak angle with diffuser. Used to soften light appearance on close to wail/ceiling applications. Output multiplier (_87. ice LPA Toss) Finish/Color: Visitwww,litecontrol,cornlfinishes for details, CCT: 27K-2700koutput multiplier (0.95) 30K-.3000K output multiplier (0.9W 35K-3500K output multiplier (1.00)4 40i-4000K output multiplier (1.03) 50K-5000K output multiplier {1.05) 27K9 2700K 90 CRI output multiplier (0.83) 30K9-3000K90CRI output multiplier (0.85) 35K9-3500K 90 CRi output multiplier (0.88) 40K9-4000K 90 CRI output m u Itiplier (0.90) 50K9-5000X 90CRi output muItiplier(0.93) 4Sca le all values from 35 K Color Variation: 2 step ivlacAdarri ellipse Output {Vf technology): Variable Intensity (Vi) technology allows precise specification of fixture output/wattage. Fixture will be programmed and labeled to specification. Indirect and direct hemispheres can be independently specified. Specify each in 50 lumen increments/ft within the below range: Lumens/ft Nomenclature Indirect Min: 300 1030 Max: 1250 1125 Emergency: ER 10W battery powered driver. Provides a minimum of 90 minutes of emergency lighting. Inverter -Compatible, Provided by others. See separate LC -Emergency spec sheet for additional details_ Thru wirings See separate LC-Thruwi're spec sheet for additional details. Page 316 Rev. i1f1311i9 Driver: NOM: D05: D01: DS1: D00_ D50: LEC: LTW: DALI: DALIP: 22L-W-1 22 LEA Wall Indirect Non -dimming. Fixture will be wired for fixed light output, Osram 100%-S%dlmiming range, Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control- Only applicable if either 2230T0, 2750T or 2765T Is selected. 100%-1%dirnming range- Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control. Soft -Start 100%-196 dimming range. Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control_ Dim -to -off 10096-116 Dimming range, Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming_ Soft -Start Dim -to -off 100%-196dimming range- Fixture will be wired for law voltage 0-10V dimming control_ Hi -Lure 1% Ecosystem LW Driver with Soft -on, Fade -to -Black dimming technology. Lutrwn Hi-Lume 2-Wire dimming using Luton A -Series driver, DALI compatible. Self -Powered DALI bus (e.g. SR, DECAL) Field Accessibility: LED boards and drivers can be accessed and removed from fixture, while installed. Entire LED module can be removed and replaced, Circuiting: 1C (1 Circuit) Fixture wired fora single circuit, Nlghtlights See separate LC-Nightlight spec sheet for additional details- km NX Distributed Intelligence« IINTE IBU DLLIGENCE Supports Indoor and outdoor applications, wired, wireless and hybrid networked NX lighting mntrol deployments and enabled emerging application, such as Hubbell sighting's 5pectraSync'" Color Tuning Technology_ See separate NK Application Guide for additional details, See Hubbell Controls Solution NX Brorh+ira, Sensors: 511: Daylight sens0r(Wattstapper part 1WD301 j- 501: Occupancy sensor(Wattstopper FS-305 with F5-L.6 lens)_ NX: See separate Control Options Guide for additional details. SpectraSync" Color Tuning Tedmology. r� Ct r� y— Control your space based on the needs of the application, specific activities throughout the day and preferences of the occupants with two distinct Spectra5ync'" Color Tuning Technology_ Dim to Warm: Dim to Warm mimics the familiar warming effect that o€curs with traditional incandescent sources as they are dimmed. (Available with 2200K-3000K), Tunable White Tunable White offers users the ability to tailor CCT to their personal preference., enhancing task visibility, material and colors or the aesthetics of the space, (Available with 2700K-5000K or 2700K-6500K)- See separate 5pectraSync" Tech Sheet for additional details, See separate NX"' Solutions Guide for additional Beta its_ lip Quick Find litecontroLeom 22L-W-I LED f 22L-W-I 0209LItecontrol,adt sInofHubbeiLighting,rnc.4'00f:cationssublecttochangewithoutnotice. 65 Spring Street Flympton, f Q2367 # Tel 781.294.0100 r Websitewww.itecnntru cwn HUBBELL Lightirng LITECO TL Imakingl Iiq lit work Details (continued) Dust cover. Clear acrylic lens, Rated Life (LED Board): Tested in accordance to LM79-2008 & derived from EPA TM-21 calculator L70: >61,000 (reported per TM-21JLM80 6x's limitation) L90; >61 AO0 (reported per TNI-21fLM80 6x's limitation) Driver: z50,000 hours (5 year Warranty) Individual Mounting; Row Mounting: 22L-W-1 Zz LEA Wall Indirect Rated Life (Driver); Standard=100,000 hours Lutron = 50,000 hours Fixture weight 3 Ibsfft. Ratings: CSA listed for damp locations. It3EW- AF of L.1JL924 Warranty: LED Boards- 5 years LW Drivers (standard)` 5 years, Lutron- 3 years TOP VIEW - INDIVIDUAL MOUNTED WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE 6.ao' BOTH SIDES I 1 / r WALL BRACKET r r r r r r r FIXTURE LENGTH —I. - TOP VIEW - ROW MOUNTED WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE WALL SRACKET 6.X1 FROM ENDS OF FIXTURE / jd./ r r r .. r r r r 1 r r r r 1 1 End cap -age 4J8 Rev.11i13t19 -4— FIXTURE LENGTH—* FIXTURE LENGTHS FIXTURE LENGTH—i FIXTURE LENGTH ROW LENGTH lib Quick Find litecontro rcorn 22L-W-I LED f 22L-W-I 152019Litecontrol,dMSlonofHubbell LIghnng,rnc.S cificatlonssublecttochangewlthoutnotice. HUJBBBELL 66 Spring Street Plympton, MA 02367 # Tel 781.294.0100 r Websitewww.Itecnntrd.co n Lighting LITECO \TOL making light work Details (continued) Color Char a de riStelr Value it RI Ordering 30K code 35K 40K 83 82 82 Rg 96 96 96 CCT (K) 3009 3494 3975 Duv -0,0009 -0.0004 -0.0003 x 0.435 0.4052 0.3814 y 0.4012 0.3898 0.3768 ClE Ra 83 83 84 Collor Vector G rap hit: 40K: Page 816 Rev.11/13/19 22L-W-I 22 LED Wall Indirect Spectral Distribution! 100% 80% 0% 380 430 480 530 580 630 Wilvtlength Onirn Color Gamut/Fidelity Mat 140 R,-R, Plot 0 110 120 114 I 90 70 04 54 10 CRI: 80 minimum hews kr META iv >Was, &pax cac. — (11{ — — 40K ru 09 1:1 Fiddi&vridiw„ 11, 560 730 Ca CRI R1 im- R2 R3 R4 q5 R6 R7 71111110 R131. 30K 83 82 91 97 81 82 89 84 62 13 79 79 69 84 99 35K 83 81 89 95 81 81 85 86 65 13 73 79 62 83 97 40K 84 82 90 94 82 82 85 87 68 17 74 80 60 81 97 lb Quick Find litecontrol-corn 22L-W-I LED 122L-W-I 2010 Liteconirol, a dm5On of Hubbell Lighting, Inc. Srocifications5ubleck to change withocit notice. 66 Spring Street Flympton, Fu 02367 Tel 781-294,0100 ,'Websitewww.itectiatiol.com HIJIBBELL Lighting LITECO TL making liq lit work Photometry Fixture: 221LP-I-LPA-4-CX-301E• 112k-L)01-1GLINV-W3 CCT: 30001E Output:1120 Nominal lumens: 1200 lumens/ft Efficacy: 118 ImJW Test report: 22L-PPFLPA-4-CX-301C-112t1-DQ1-1C LINV--W3 *Photometry for reference only. Maximum lumen output is 1250. Page 6A6 Rev.11l13119 22L-W-1 zz LEA Wall Indirect II. ter, . . ! miso ZonaI Linens_ Zone Lumens Lamp% 90-180 1' C C I Quick Filth litecontroLcom 22L-W-I LED f 22L-W-I 0209 Litecontrol. clMSOn of HUbbelliti9hting, Inc.SrocificatiOnSsublecttochangewithoutnotice. HUBBELL 66 Spring Street F1ympton, MA02367 # Tel 781.294,0100 r Websitewww.itecnntrd.cco n Lighting LITECONTROL DATE: meting light work- TYPE: LW LOCATION: PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4L-P-D MOD" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT FEATURES • Variable Intensity technology provides a range of specifiable outputs and resulting fixture wattages . 2 SDCM color consistency End cap design eliminates visible diffuser seams/gaps CONTROLS ' DISTR 9UTED- ii1extra$ nc• r r. ra_u f 1- SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION • :Dus .onstructed from extruded aluminum • End ceps constructed from die cast aluminum with magnetic interface • End caps overlap diffuser at each fixture end 7,3 elimate gaps and LED visibility OPTICAL PERFORMANCE • 2 SDCM co or consistency. 80 or 90 CRI • SOF: Soft diffuse acrylic lens • REG: fh' regressed softglo lens with painted steel inserts. Output multiplier (.77) • BWO: White blade baffle with saftglo Tens overlay. Output multiplier (.70) ASYM; Asymmetric Highly transmissive diffuse acrylic lens with linear prisms • BAT; "Batwing" distribution created created from highly transmissive diffuse acrylic lens with linear prisms • DRP: 1,2' protruding soft diffuse "drop" lens INSTALLATION • Suspension required at every row joint. 3164" diameter field -adjustable aircraft cables, ships separately • Low profile cable gripper limits visibility while providing maximum horizontal balance adjustment • Pendant locations at ends of rows (or individual fixtures) are 1/2" from fixture ends • Pendant attachment allows for horizontal adjustment to 'fine-tune" side -to -side leveling • Illuminated corners available in 90',120% 15°- One piece Construction, ready to install, with diffusers that match adjoining fixtures_ Corner system connectors must be used to firm patterns, The length of each outside or inside illuminated corner is 12' CATALOG #: 4L•P•AD• 14-08•ASYM-C 1.35IC-D1O0•D01 •UNV- W3-FAL-CB 1 MOD RELATED PRODUCTS B 2L-P-17 8 3L-P-D 8 6L-P-13 INSTALLATION (CONTINUED} - Square and Triangle non -illuminated connectors match future width for COntinuous IOok - Fixture weight 3lbs/ft ELECTRICAL - Variable Intensity (VI) technology allows preCiSe Specification Of fixture Output/ wattage. Fixture will be programmed and labeled to specification. Indirect and direct hemispheres tan be independently specified • LED boards and drivers can be accessed and removed from fixture. while installed • Entire LED module can be removed and replaced • 1C (1 Circuit) Fixture wired for a single circuit - Non -feed: 2• diameter canopy covers provided (unless 5' non -feed cover Is specified) - Feed Cord: 4-wire, 7 amps max: 5•wrre, 5 amps max Emergency Battery. lOW battery powered driver_ Provides a minimum of 90 minutes of emergency lighting, Inverter -Compatible. Provided by others_ Available in 4'+' fixtures CONTROLS Sensors install between diffusers . NX Distributed Intelligence": Supports indoor and outdoor applications, wired, wireless and hybrid networked NX lighting control deployments and enabled emerging applications, such as Hubbell Lighting's SpectraSync" Color Tuning Technology 5pectra5ync" Color Tuning Technology: Control your space based on the needs of the application, specific activities thrOuyhOut the day and preferences of the occupants SERVICE PROGRAMS s� CERTIFICATIONS • DLC° {DesignLights Consortium) Qualified - see www_designlights_org • CSA listed for damp location IBEW • AF of L • UL924 This product qualifies as a "desIgnated country construction mateiial' per FAR 52, 225-11 Buy America n-Construction, Materials under Tirade Agreements effective 8/14t2020_ See 9uv American Solutions. Contact factory for configurations including SpectraSync:, NX, or sensors_ WARRANTY • LED boards - 5 years • LED drivers (standard) - 5 years • LED drivers (Lutron) - 3 years • See www.litecontrolcom for details KEY DATA Lumen Range Per Foot D; 300 -1100 Wattage Range Per Foot 2.6-10.0 Efficacy Range (LP'W) 110-118 Rated Life (Hours) L70: >61,000 L; 1,0 A81 W01OHd SJCVIMv JO T VNOISN riC0 $ cil HS) D h l D C-d-11' Page tV91, r2t#3V31 4t grit 0 2021 LUSec r r0l a Ow sion of HLi 0 I Lighting. InC SpeCth bons sutiect 14 change WItI i1 n4tK6 65 Spring Sheet Plyrnplpn, MA 02367 r Tel 784264 MOO r websge w.v v IitecontroI corn HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL making right work` DATE TYPE: LW LOCATION: PROJECT: IOWA CONSERVATORY 4 L-P-D MOD'" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT ORDERING GUIDE CATALOG 4: 4L-P-AD-14-08-ASYM-C1-35K-D100-D01-UNV- W 3-FAI -CBI C'ATALQG r 4L•Ps,'tiD•14-06•ASAN.C1.35K•RII •1341•UN-V.W3•FAI•CBl 4L Series 4L MCO Mount nn P Pendant Fixture Distribution FAD Asymmetric Direct Row Length jtn Feet: I� Color Tarn pernturt! VK 30K 27COK� 3CQOk 3'SK 3500K 40K SDK 27K9 3OK9 35K9 40Kg 50IC9 2230TD 2750T 27551' 4C04K 50000 2700K, 90 CRI1 30O0+C 90 CRI 3500K, 90 CRI 40001 90 CRI S000 ,%CRt' 2200K-3000KC 5pectra5ync"Dim-to-Warm5 2700K-SCO0k SOW.ra5yn ' Tunable WNW 27001-65G0K SpeclraSyrtC" TLM1B0le Whites OPTIONAL NL Nig(1tlightCPcuit Rewired Enter quantity. 2NL=2 nlghlligptt CleantairOw EF 1OW Emergency Battery Pack Enter quantity 2EF = 2 elrel gency T DirsCt Outpu!Rt' D434 2C0lrnir 14 D125 127,7, ...., P100 WI No Thru Wire W2 Provide Normal and 61t,yencyt Nightllgtlt Thu }brings W3 Provide Nonni! Ttru Winng Only = Service Program ctSZ Click hoer ibr a 175r or Otifcl 5hlp gprr'ovrs Ex rnple:4L-P-D$08-SOF-C1-27K-D03O 1-1C-LINV-FA1 Max Length In Row 02 2', 6CCrmn 03 3• 914mm 04 4,1219rm1 05 0• 1524mm 06 .6'.18.29rnm 108 0, 2438mm Du1 P% Dimmin, 040V I I000 Dp5 D51 DSC LEC I DALI DALIP NDM Patterns <" 196 clirn•to-OR, 0.10V SpectraSy i 5% Dimming. 0-10Vr 1% Dimming vet Soft Start. 0-10v 1 Dim -to -Off m' Snit Sten. 0-10V HHume 1% Ecosystem LEI) Driver DAII a Powered by DAL] (2.0)* Nan-Dirlmr g C80L Illtmnated 90° Comer C12OL Illtrrtinated 124' Comer C135L Ilkornaled 135' Comer Control Options'' NX Standalone PIKS NHS, FIR ST Occupancy/Daylight 5 $I( WW1s.'" 14X Networked —Wired N?iE F'JXES F4X. dual Smar9P0RTs" 'r NY, FIR ST O-cupanc eylightSensor Side Mour4, Dual Srnmtla0Rrsg•la NX Networked — Wireless NS€SW Fdk141reless, PIP BT LYwpancyMaylight Sensor Ilk W"Q HXWWE NXWireless VWrrelessEnabled" ~ NX Networked WinetWAl roles NxvlAreles3, PIP BT OCoupenCyDayliA Sensor. Dual SmartPOPTSIRW1F i4lrelE55, Du2J S rrartPC TSx" NXSW D MOND Sensors 501 Daylight 54rtSOrRC aired, Errt6r quantity. 2501= 2 daylight SLr1SOrshow S01 044t dncy Sensor Required. Enter quantity. 2501= 2 occupancyserlsorsirow Direct Optical Distribution SOF Soft Diffuse bens, Lambertian REG Regressed Diffuse Lensl 13WQ 616d6 Bathe *Rh O 9rkry1 }&SYM ASymmebiCDilfu1e1ensts RAT Batwng Lens PRP Drop Lens' CO2 T-barcip-9V1W C83 T-barcip-MUSS C1 Matte White lDefrjJt LPN Unkeerstl Voltage; (120V through 277Y) C2 03 C4 C5 C6 CC Teastured Matte White. Light$iv r Machned Aluminirn enet fl Black Tired Camera back CLlsinm C'o'cf r=A1 5uspension Iqt, 51' FA2 Suspension Kit, 87• FA3 Susperdon kit 219' FM Susperson Kit, 363' Notes. 1 Not Available with Pauerrd. 2 Must be ordered with AD. 3 ;Walk nal lead time nw be applicable Contact factory. 4 Vitt www.itecmtrotcomlrrisiesrorderals 5 Must be ordei-ed wish DO5 Driver option; excludes 2' lengths and patterns. 6 5pecneble in 50Irrnen ineernenrs. Pefasence the P+erTeumerr_e Dale Table far lull performarKe o1Terilg and exceptions. 7 D030 not available in2' 8 Mat he ordered with 2230TD, 2754T or 2765T Option 9 Excludes Emergency Battery Peck LF Option. Erckxles DALL DALIP end Lutrcn fi_ECI Dimrnng [rivers 10 Add suffix!V to replace ell 2' non -feed canopy covers with 5' canopy carers. FAW - 51' suspension WI WI 5- canopies canopies and feed card are suppled In whhe regardless of Axrwe polar vnlssa oihe.wise specified. 11 EF - 14W battery powered driver. Provides a minimum of 94 minutes of emergency lighting. kr.+elter- CampeGhle. Provided by others. 12 Only applicable when specified with EinergencyhightiigFt. 13 Contact Factory for Willem configurations. Apprrnal drawings required 14 Includes Lumineire Canopy t#arc NX i dlinme Cortina dip5einic 15 Not scalable nor row mounting. Only &reliable xith 0-14V Driver cfsikwa. Contact r&lcry irx Length rgxlnctlrfl 15 Rorer to Fix. trtpgretpg Ca-rtrnls R rars TAW:. for Fun.tlpnalty gf Pprilgm. 17 NX $9noer5 with &mrlpgth, 0LE prowdps rgmgtc ggmml$gpn pry. drkS 51 If l a--d-lb 8 Page 219 Rev.12i23a1 0 2021 Lltecontiroi. a CIMSnan Pi Hubbell Lighting. Inc, Spectllrotlon5 subject to change wthoLR ng7C6, 65 Spring Street Pyrnp1on, MA 02367I Tel 784294 0100 r'meow w.vwlnecontrol porn HUISIEIELL URhtltreg LITECONTROL making light work` DATE: TYRE: LOCATION: IPROJECT: 4 L-P-D MOD'" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT CONTROLS CATALOG #: NX Distributed Intelligence'" Lighting Controls: Supports bosh indoor and outdoor applications in a variety of deployment options- wired. wireless. hybrid. Integrates with and enables a wide array of luminaires including those with SpectraSyrrc Color Tuning Technology. „ , DISTRIBUTED - :In INTELLIGENCE NX INTEGRATED CONTROLS REFERENCE NXOphor. ens tr Networkatlle Scheduling Occupancy Hamming Harvesting 0-10V dimming On/off Control Eluetootir App Programming NX Standalone NXS NXSMP-SMI I No I Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NX Networked — Wired NXE N/A Yes Yes No Np Yes Yes Requires NX;aTCR 1 NXES N SMP-$MI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NX Networked — Wireless NXSWW NXSMP-SMI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NXWE 1 MA Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No' NX Networked — Wired/Wireless NXSWD NXSMP-SMI Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NXWD NIA Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Requires NXDTCJR t"a 1 rl}E8TC Ft ne8tl51.0 de plugger- Into an eMlat'9 FIX Sinai—POW'pn Roe firkin? nehaprlr 2 r'rogra tmr irrg via Apt requires Factory assistance 3 To program t114'HE oplkin need to oonault ractonr. !' connected to an erea conworer, programming can be done from Mat SoectraSvnc` Color Tuning Technology: Control you r space based on the needs of the application, specific activities throughout the day and preferences of the occupants with distinct SpectraSync" Color Tuning Technologies. SpectraSync SPECTRASYNC COLOR TUNING TECHNOLOGY Mode Kelvin Range Desaiptlon Dim to Warm 2ZOOK-3000K M mica the familiar warming effect that occurs with traditional incandescent sources as they are dimmed Tunable White 2700K•5000K 2700K 6500K Offers users the ability to tailor CCT to their personal preference. enhancing task visibility, material and colors or the aesthetics of the space Scheduled White270OK•5000K 2700K 6500K Mimics the rhythm of natural light or follows an alternative user -defined schedule throughout the day, enhancing an occupant's mood and well-being SpectraSvnc Tunable White Available in MO options: 2750T (27OOK-5OOOK) Or 2765T (2700K-6500K}. Requires two 0-10V cortrolle •s, one for intensity and one for CCT. Minimum 5% dimming. 81.3Ck (HOT) White (NEUTRAL) Green (GROUND) Violet (DIMMING +) Pink (DIMMING •) Violet/White (WHfrETUNE t) Grey/White (WHITE TUNE -) SpeciraSpvc Tumble 1'rhte luminaires are provided wdh two 0-1011 ercmis. The violet and sank maul for +,trots to any clualrled 0-10v centrally for dimming. The velet/ut,lle and gip ny r,lte crcuit is for wiring to errs guelified 0-16V contrtreller for Tunable White CCT co lroL Controller Manufacturer Data SpectraSync Tunable White was designed to be used with sinking style dimmers (provided by others) and is compatible with: • Hubbell Control Solutions (HCS): NX Distributed Intelligence'" Room Controllers (NXRC) and In -future Controllers [NXFM) • Lutron: DVTV, DVSTV, and NFf1J dimmers • Wattstopper. ADF120277 and CD4BL (Titan) dimmers Color Tuning Raffle r It —€W.re1I aping uO!leoiIddV utsasaa XN airr4pala XN 8 3Wi5eip d5 aprti suopiOS XN g page Rev,12123121 0' 2021 Llte€ontirol. a division pi HUbbeu Lighting. Inc. Specdlcatlans Riled t0 change wanoul n tloa. +j1.-P-tt 65 spring Street Pynip14n. MA 02367 r Tel 384294 d100 r we4911e wrrw lltecontroi corn rnnou I HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL makIng light work` DATE_ TYPE: LOCATION: IPROJECT: 4 L-P-D MOD'" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT CATALOG #: PERFORMANCE DATA TABLE The tablle below Shows the delivered lumens for the various lumen outputs, Use this chart in connection with the output multiplier capability to deliver any output required. Nomenclature Lumens/Ft WJPt Efficacy D030;mirp cos Go40 E515 O 050 0055 a060 0955 pj70 13075 O 060 O 0a5 0090 0095 0100 0145 D110 {rne>4 t++BttageTr y vary up- to 9k. LrOrn publtinE.11- Downlipirt 300 2.6 113 50 3.0 11 400 3.4 113 450 32 115 500 42 113 550 4.7 117 5r00 5.1 11. 650 5.6 116 7)00 63 1E6 750 6.5 115 000 7.0 1r5 650 7.5 1A 900 7.9 113 950 3.5 1000 9.0 1050 1100 Output Restrictions Driver options listed belcxw are not available for the output and length as shown. 112 112 10.0 110 Restrictions - Direct Ler'nylln #eel} 2 3 5 5 a OttputLPA 300� LEL DALI, 347V 1ALI, 347V 40D I 450 LEC, CALL 347V MILL 347V DALI,347V OAU. 347V 500 DALI, 347V 950 1000 LEC LEC LEC LEC LEA LEE Output Multiplier Table PhataiumetrIcs for the 4L are published here at a nominal 3500K temperature_ This table may be used to approximate the lumen values at different K€tvir temperatures. PAwer C 1n5umption would stay the same. LEC LEC LEC LEC LEC LEC Option 270OK 3000K 3500K 4000K 5000K 2700K 90 CRI 3000K 90 CRI 35001( 90 CRI 40001E 90 CRI 5000K 90 CRI SOF 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 REG 0,73 0.75 0.77 0.79 0,81 0,64 0.65 0.68 0.69 0.72 E WO 0.67 0.69 010 0-72 0-76 0-63 0.53 0.47 0_42 0.39 ASYM 0.95 0.98 1.00 t03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 BAT 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 DRP 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.03 1.05 0.83 0.85 0.88 0.90 0.93 LEAD 0.86 0.88 0.90 7 0.93 0.95 1 0.75 0.77 0,79 021 0.84 Pigs A1j elm 1 3/2t 0 2021 Liteccrrrrol. a division p1 Hubbea Lighting. Inc, $pecikat14ns Laeti to ch$rnge wah044 65 Spring Street Pyrnp1On, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r w itivie wr w Iltecintrol corn r-D •Ha BB LL LITECONTROL DATE: LOCATION: 4 makIng Ipght work` L-P-D MOD" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT DIMENSIONS Fl.:TJR= LENGTH -12- 4 7.16' — 5'b KC • • END CAP — • INDIVIDUAL MOUNTING / r • • • / / r r r • • / • r r • • / / r r r r • • — FAUACC/F SIDE VIEW - INDIVIDUAL MOUNTED PENDANT MOUNTED FIXTURE /i 24.36.48 ,60.72 .96 FIXTURE LENGTH FIXTURE LENGTH FIXTURE LENGTH FIXTURE LENGTH V2` — MINUS 1/2" / •, • r / / 1 s • • / /—..; 1 / / U—FAfACC/F u END CAP — 0 0 �}— MINUS 1U2' j • • • • • • • . .0 .0 .0r • / / I I / r FAIFACC INT FIXTURE INT FIXTURE FIXTURE AT END OF ROW FIXTURE AT END OF ROW suspension cable location on female encl... Ii I 12 1211132" 12 11 2f+32' 4S 90', 120', 135" 2 2116' 12L) 3 3116" (3L) 4 716' (4L) 6 716"(8L) - c„I-Tcabon on male end PATTERNS SIDE VIEW • ROW MOUNTED PENDANT MOUNTED FIXTURES ROW MOUNTING 4 25" (108mm) 4 43" (113mm) END CAP VIEW 4 5" (114mm) 1 age 519 Riw.1V123/21 0 202i Lltecor- rol. a division pt HU4G4'h Lighting. Inc, $pectlkeU4n9 Riled kQ change wthol4 riutioe. 4410-D 65 Spring Street Pyrnplpn, MA 02367 t Tel 784294 MOO t Wetr9ne wrnv Iit ntro' can HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL DATE LOCATION: 4 making Hight work` L-P-D MOD'" 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT PHOTOMETRY 4L-P-D-04-SOF-X-CX 35K-D100 LUMINAIRE DATA POLAR GRAPH Description AL Pendent,Salt Diffuse Lens, 3500K Defiwered Lumens 4000 W{ntt$ Efficacy 112. Mcuntir l Pendant ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zane 0-40 0-60 0-90 0-180 Lumens %Lumineire 47.1 804 100.0 100.0 4L-R-AD-4 XX-XX-AS II M-CX-35K-D050 LUMINAIRE DATA Description 3 L Pendant, Soft Diffuse Laos. 3500K Delivered Lurnens 21000 Watts Efficacy 124 M[wntii g Pendent ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone 0-40 0-60 0-90 0-1S0 982.00 165+3.00 2016.00 2015.00 % Luminaire 48.7 62.3 100.0 1000 LEGEND: 0-deg. 45-tlag: 90-1ect POLAR GRAPH 30' 9P` 75 60' 45' 75' 6p' 45' Page 619 Rey. 12/2341 0 2421 Litecontrol. a dM19Un pf H ONA Lighting. Inc. $pectlkdt14n9 Riled t04h$nge wtnotR nggcg, 4L-P-fir 65 Spring Street Pyrnp1on, MA 02367 r Tel 784294 0100 r wetme www lltecDn6 oI corn HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL DATE LOCATION: 4 making fight work` L-P-D MIDD- 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT PHOTOMETRY CONTINUED 4L X-D-0 4-BAT- X 35K-D10O LUMIINAIRE DATA Descrlptan A L Pentlenk, Salwing Lens. 3500K L3e#iwered Lumens 4300 WiI$ Efficacy 111 Mcxlntin9 Prnrianr ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zane O -40 0-60 0-90 0-180 Lumens `:625.84 3056.77 -39443.70 400(1172 % Luminaire 40.64 76.42 9030 1000 4L-X*D"04-DRP CX-35K-D100 LUMINAIRE DATA Description 4L Pr.nrinn-„ Drop Lc-;, 351:; 14 Deerrereid Lumens 4 .1{:.!1 Wads Efficacy '10 M[wntillg Pendant ZONAL LUMEN SUMMARY Zone Lumens % Luminaim 0-40 0-60 O -90 O -180 462,08 277.6 3677.99 3969.32 40.60 70.50 92.70 100_0 POLAR GRAPH 1Qd 7s34 ��� 4 Alit Ili ft if small 4 1 tlit / a+a a44b iu 4147 f1 e I r IP K 34' veil,'WN alToKin 41mc61W NOM.V-tea} Vreftr Ihtr 7r c„y, Henan W Any.epl5- • r251 Vaned Reg Trra.Nh Hnrzomd Mplas 190• - 270 i POLAR GRAPH :at 0 4 1 w eir fo a - m Iwo air / *III L • 30' wimuS plane TIvcingM1HOM1zmI l N•-1Ag5 Varied Plane TIraalyl Horizontal MyealaY • 225) 're•icI Plane' inany' Ilenrt qN ancarata4' - 77a5 AS r2f 1OS 95 Ts' 6Q 3 23 Ica 9a 75' de Page 7d9 Ref? 12Y11 0 2CP21 Llrecartrgl. a ciM181ron pi HIvbllee Lighting. Inc. $pectlkaUona soled to change washout n4UC.Q 4L-P-D 65 $mn9 Street Feyrnp1on, MA 02362 r Tel 784294 0100 r wabane IgecontroI corn HUBBELL Lighting LITECONTROL DATE: LOCATION: 4 making light work` L-P-D MOD- 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT TIM-30 DATA COLOR VECTOR GRAPHIC Graphics sham are at 3515 — Reeererxe Ilurrin3nt Test Source COLOR CHARACTERISTICS: COLOR DISTORTION GRAPHIC • Value Ordering Code 30K 35K 40K Rf 83 82 82 R9 96 96 96 CCT (K) 3009 3494 3975 Dui 0.0009 -0.0004 -0.0003 x 0.435 0.4052 03814 y 0.4012 03898 0_3768 CIE Ra 83 83 84 COLOR VECTOR GRAPH ICI 30K C� 35K 40K TEST RESULTS - 3500K Value 80+ CRI CCT (K) 3494 CIE R4 83 0 -0.0004 Rf 82 Rn 96 x 0.4052 y 0.3898 SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION: 382 430 AEI s32 s-yC 630 1.4avr[ength ,;nrni COLOR GAMUT/FIDELITY PLOT: 140 140 120 110 — 70 Sp cm: 817 MINIMUM CCT 30K CRI 83 — 3;+: - 3�1: — ant in; 732 82 91 97 81 82 89 84 62 13 79 79 69 84 99 35K 83 81 89 95 81 81 85 86 65 13 73 79 62 83 97 40K 82 90 94 82 82 85 87 68 17 74 80 60 84 97 ?gc 3 9 kr': 12131 01 1 D 20121 iltvcontrol. a division of HU4Gea Lighting. Inc, $peGtlkdU4n5 sullect to change wah4LR 4d-113-D 65 Spring Street Pyrnp14n. MA 02367! Tel 704204 0100 r tivaime corny Inecintrol corn HUBBELL URhtli rag LITECONTROL DATE: LOCATION: 4 making right work` L-P-D MIDD- 3 LED PENDANT DIRECT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Driver I01 100%- 1% dimming range. Facture will be wired for low voltage 0.10V dimming control_ DAD Dim -to -Off 100%-1% dimming range Facture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dlmmlrg control. D05 100%-5% dimming range. Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0.10V dimming control_ Only applicable If either 2230TD. 2750T or 2765T Is selected. A51 Soft -Start 916.1 100% dimming range_ Fixture will be wired for low voltage 0-10V dimming control. DSO Soft -Start Dimto-Off 100%-1% dimming range. Fixture will be wired for k wvoltage 0-10V dimming control. LEC tli-Lome 1% EcoSystem LED Driver with Soft -On, Fade -to -Black dimming technology. DALI DALI compatible. DALI P Self -Powered DAIJ bus [e.g_ DEXAL) NDM Non -dimming. Fixture will be wired for fixed light output. Rated Life Tested in aCcordariCe to LM79-200$ & derivedfrom EPA TM-21 C21Culator L70: 2130,000 (calculated per TM-21 extrapolated curve) L70: >61,000 (reported per TM.21rLM80 6x's limitation) L90, 72,000 (catcu laced per TM-21 extrapolated curve} L9OE >61,000 (reported per TM-21+LMS0 6x'a limitation) Rated Life (Driver' Standard =100,000 hours Lutron = 50,000 hours Page 919 Rey.12/23121 0 2021 Lgecontrol. a gM 9on 4'r HvLlt.ell Lighting. Inc, Specdicetions Riled to change wthout riutioa. 4L-Fa tr 65 Spring Street Pyrnp1on, MA 02367! Tel 784294 0100 r 1Me4w www Iitecontrol corn HUBEIELL Lighting LL TYPE P1 PD80324-WH CUMULUS MINOR PD80324 PENDANTS PROJECT IOWA CONSERVATORY SPECIFICATION DETAILS ' FGr CuftOrn hotient, ehnsu0t cattiary lhr detAili Fixture Dimensions D23-7/$' a 142' Light Source LED with DC Driser Wattage 42W Total Lumens 3050Im Delivered Lumens 'WH-T884Im 'Voltage 1a0V Color Temperature 3000K CRl Ma) 90CRI Optional Color Temps 2700K = 5000e Available, Mirimum order Giantities Apply LED Rated Lira SDK° hours Dimming 100%- 10%, TRIAL or ELV Dinrner (Not Included) Diffuser Details White Acrylic Diffuser Aidjus.shle Yts Wire Length in- Mart Wi re Type Clear Coamal Wire Location bty Warranty S Years CEC Title 24 AS res 1A6-19 Canopy Dimension pg•3}4' x Ht•1/Z' Finish Option(s) Whig U Z CO g054 aTH AVENUE SURREY - 6C V32 6M3 CANADA DESCRIPTION An illuminated circurnference of bright uniform Tight the Cumulus Minor is devoid of extraneous detail appearing as a single endless loop. The miniscule ovoid profile of the polymeric ring condenses the lamp assembly into a compact yet airy visual footprint, a reduced scale From the substantial Cumulus pendant series. Available in multiple sizes. COMMENT 8-314' WI-1 • WNtm WWW.K.UZCOLIGHTING.COM wS Intertek TYPE P2 PD153D2-WH EXO PD1 5302 PENDANTS PROJECT IOWA CONSERVATORY • PD15302-WH Pt 15302-BK P015302-CH White Black Chrome SPECIFICATION DETAILS • For custom option;, Saniett factory for details. Fixture Dimensions R2' x Hr Lig ht Source LED with DC Driver WattJ.ge 7W Total Lumen5101m Delivered Lamm ens 6K-4171m; 01-4341M; WH-4401nr. ✓ oltayu 120V Col Teirireratare 3pbOR S R.I1.R?} 90CR1 Optional color romps 2700K - 5000k Avaaable, Minimum Order Quantities Apply LEhmated Lida 97000hours Diffuses Details Acrylic Lens Dimming 190%- 1Q9E TRLAC or ELV Dimmer {Nat Inducted) Adjustable 'des• Wire Length 120' Max Wire Type 6K, CH - Black Coaxial Wire; WH - White Coaxial Wre; Location Dry Warranty S Years CEC Tile 24 JAB Yes, JAB-19 Canopy Dimensions D4-3/8' x H1/4" K c o g054 28TH AVENUE SURREY - BC V32 6M3 CANADA DESCRIPTION The miniature spherical spot light that is emblernatic of the 7f series implements timeless iconography and LED technology- With an elegantly reduced scale and essential spherical form the diminutive pendant performs best in multiple fixture alignments- Asa singular lamp in a minimal setting it adds an adornment accent of materiality. Available in multiple curated finishes_ COMMENT Finish BK - Black CH • Chrome WH - White 02' WSW-ICUZCOLIGHTING.COM wS Intertek IITRACK LIGHTING SERIES -ACCESSORIES TYPE T1 END CAP ETII>6-A H r- 4,5 z 1 Z c3 rn rn sn n n rn 0 72 rn Pendant Cord Adapter ETI22- I - -Circuit Color: 01 White • Black Sign Hanger ET123- - 1-Circuit Color: ❑ White • Black End Cap ET 106- I -Circuit ET21O -_ 2-;`in it SI Black Slope Ceiling Adapter ETIIS- I - -Circuit Color: ❑ White ■ Black Line Voltage Round MoroiMorcom Plate ET I40- - 1-Circuit Color: ❑ White ■ Black Floating Canopy ETI03- I-CIurt ET1IO3-_ 2-�_.)r uit Color: ❑ White ■ Black -Silver 7 Satin Nickel MR16 LENS RLTER CAT.# COLOR 6P8MR16-BL BLUE BP8MR16-GR GREEN 6P8MR16-PI PIM( BP8MR16-PU PURPLE BP8t1IR16-DL DAY LIGHT BP8MR16-YE YELLOW BPBMR16-AM AMBER BP8MR16-OR ORANGE 6PBMR16-RE RED Outlet Adapter ET124- 1-Circuit Color: ❑ White • Black Livia End with Cover ETI38-_ 1-cir.:_I_n1 ET2138- 2-C rck. Color: ❑ White ■ Black T-Bar live End ET 137- I -Circuit ET2137-_ 2-Circuit C Icr: J White M Black MR16 SPECIALTY LENS FILTER CAT. # COLOR 1. BP8MR16-SOL SOLITE 2. BP8MR113-CL CLEAR 3, BP8MR16-HC HONEY COMB 4. BP8MR16-UV ULTRAVIOLET 5, BP8MR16-LI LINEAR 6. BP8MR113-FR FROSTED 7, BP8MR16-WA WAVE 8. BP8MR113-SP SPREAD 9�6 elite 4. WWW.IUSEELITE.COM • TEL 1-877-375-5555 • FAX 1-877-375-3333 LIN E VOLTAGE TRACK LIGHTING TYPE T'1 ET2Ufi-WH .y' h1 ET216 - FRONT LOADING GlRLAL RING LAMP 5OW PAR2O OR LED-PAR29 DIun s= IDi Diameter IV Length IM) Max. Extenson FINISH WH - White BK - Blade 2-3/4' 3-5/8' 7-1/4` 111 • ET217 - FRONT LOADING GIBMIAL RING LAMP 75W PAR30 OR LED-PAR3U DIMENSIONS Diemsler 11) Length IIAj Max. Extension FINISH WH - White BK - Back a-Wr8• 4" 8-1 /8" ■ ET218 - FRONT LOADING GIRLAL RING LAMP 15014E PAR3B OR LED-PAR38 DIMENSIONS ID) Diameter (I-) Length ¥NA Max. Extension F111ISH WH White BK - Black 5.3f4' 4' 9-3/4- ■ ET205 - MINIATURE PORCELAIN LIMP WAR LAMP 150W OR LED Ft/PAR LAMP DIMENSION (D)Diameter 1-3/4' {Li Length 6" IM) Max. Extension 8" FINISH WH - White BK - Black • ET206 - ROUND BMX UNIVERSAL LAMP R/PAR LAMP 15011E OR LED RfPAR LAMP DIMUISIOHS ;D) Diameter {Lj Length (LI) Max. Extension FINISH WH - White BK - Black 1-3/4' 8" 14-5r8" ■ ET206-UNIVERSAL PAR HOLDER LAMP WPM LAMP 150W OR LED RJPAR LAMP DIMENSIONS ID) Diameter 1-3/4' IU Length 7-7/8' MA) Max. Extension 9-3/4' FINISH WH = Whae BK - Black ■ 965 elit641pHTIMC EIu2 tc the charges of carslanl inprrroarrent in ligh'ina to:hrroingi; all details are sutiecl is change without. noFice. Gnngplt FaCtrir fIX pp t4 dale irdprrnrilipn. Item Number: 6.1. ..71441 CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org January 10, 2023 Resolution approving Final Plat of Walden Hills Part Two Iowa City, Iowa. (S U B22-0018) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Final Plat Resolution STAFF REPORT To: City Council Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner Item: SUB22-0018 Date: January 10, 2023 Walden Hills Part Two — A Resubdivision of Outlot #2 of Walden Hills GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Jason Walton Navigate Homes Jason@navigatehomesiowa.com Contact Person: Jon Marner MMS Consultants j.marner@mmsconsultants.net Owner: Dave Oyler Crossing Land, LLC Requested Action: Approval of final plat Purpose: To resubdivide Outlot #2 of Walden Hills in order to convey the open space area to the City of Iowa City Location: South of West High School and East of Shannon Drive Location Map: Size: 6.06 acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Undeveloped, zoned Medium Density Single - Family Zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8) North: P-1 - Public South: OPD/RS-8 - Medium Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay East: OPD/RS-8 - Medium Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned 2 Development Overlay West: OPD/RS-8 - Medium Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay Comprehensive Plan: Public/Private Open Space District Plan: Southwest District Neighborhood Open Space District: SW6 File Date: November 15, 2022 60 Day Limitation Period: January 10, 2023 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Jason Walton of Navigate Homes, submitted a final plat for Walden Hills Part 2, a resubdivision of Outlot #2 of Walden Hills. The Walden Hills Final Plat was approved on June 3, 1997 (Resolution 97-175). As part of the final plat of Walden Hills the owner was required to dedicate Outlots 1 and 2 to the City for public use. Per the subdivider's agreement the City would not accept the dedication until such time as all public improvements within the subdivision are installed, permanent groundcover is established and mowable within the outlots, erosion and sedimentation are controlled within the subdivision, and 90% of the land within the area has been developed. Since the approval of the final plat in 1997, Outlot 2 has yet to be conveyed to the City. Over time several structures, including fences and sheds, were built by adjacent private property owners within the Outlot. The City could not take ownership of Outlot 2 with these encroachments. Therefore, the main purpose of this final plat is to clean-up these encroachments in order for Outlot 2 to be conveyed to the City. Despite the delay in the conveyance, a public trail runs through the Outlot which has been available for members of the public to use and enjoy. The final plat for Walden Hills Part 2 includes Outlot A, which will be dedicated to the City for public open space. A portion of Outlot A will also be used for stormwater management. It also includes Outlots B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, which will be dedicated to the adjacent property owners as private open space not for future development. Outlots B-I contained the encroachments and were removed from the original Outlot 2. The final plat includes no developable lots. ANALYSIS: The final plat of Walden Hills Part Two is in general compliance and subdivision regulations. Legal papers and construction drawings are currently being reviewed by staff. It is anticipated that these documents will be approved prior to the January 10, 2023 Council meeting. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject property contains regulated woodlands and a stream corridor. The applicant submitted a Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan concurrently with the Final Plat application. The Final SADP meets the base requirements of the sensitive area ordinance and has been reviewed and approved by staff, subject to approval of the Final Plat. Neighborhood Open Space: The City's Neighborhood Open Space Ordinance requires the dedication of land or a fee in -lieu therefore for residential subdivisions. A land dedication would need to be approximately 1.4 acres and Outlot A is 5.64, which exceeds the neighborhood open space requirement. 3 Storm Water Management: Storm water management is being met through an existing storm water retention basin in Oultot A. However, the existing storm water retention basin silted in over time and has gone from being a wet bottom basin to a dry bottom basin. The basin has silted in to the extent that it no longer meets the required storage volume. Also, the bottom of the basin does not drain which makes it impossible to maintain. Instead of restoring the basin to the original design, the developer has decided to make improvements to convert it into a dry bottom basin that would be acceptable to the City. Public Works staff has reviewed the storm water management plans, included as part of the construction documents, and will require improvements to the storm water detention basin prior to Outlot A being conveyed to the City. Once Outlot A is conveyed, the City will take on the responsibility of maintaining the storm water facility. NEXT STEPS: Once the final plats, construction drawings, and legal documents are approved and all improvements have been accepted by the City, the City will work with the owner on the conveyance of Outlot 2 to the City for public open space. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of SUB22-0018, the final plat of Walden Hills Part 2, a resubdivision of Outlot #2 of Walden Hills. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Final Plat — Walden Hills Part 2 Approved by: Dante e Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services EEG d� d ,= 4; (§ ua ..... Es' ( E; . ) .m} :0B . |,),! 1�ee Plat 0,0 k Lets STATE OF IOWA JOHNSON COUNTY 11111111 n i ip III IMII II II. 1111111 IO 11 Doc ID 032026650015 Type: GEN Kind: SUBDIVISION Recorded: 01/20/2023 at 10:53:54 AM Fee Amt: $77.00 Page 1 of 15 Johnson County Iowa Kim Painter County Recorder BK6454 PG249-263 ) SS ) 1 ill 1, �� +rC0.mll CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1526 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.legov.erg I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Resolution attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 23-13, which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the loth day of January 2023, all as the same appears of record in my office. Also attached are the final legal documents for Walden Hills Part Two, Iowa City, Iowa. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, day of J a (4 _ i t dt f , 2023. Kellie K. Fruehling City Clerk \res subdivision Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington St, lowa City. IA 52240 Resolution No. 23-13 Resolution Approving Final Plat of Walden Hills Part Two, Iowa City, Iowa. (SUB22-0018) Whereas, the owner, Crossing Land, LLC, filed with the City Clerk the final plat of Walden Hills Part Two, Iowa City, Iowa, Johnson County, Iowa; and Whereas, said subdivision is located on the following -described real estate in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, to wit: OUTLOT #2 OF WALDEN HILLS TO IOWA CITY, IOWA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 38 AT PAGE 13 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE. SAID OUTLOT #2 CONTAINS 6.06 ACRES, AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. Whereas, the Neighborhood arid Development Services Department and the Public Works Department examined the proposed final plat and subdivision, and recommended approval; and Whereas, a dedication has been made to the public, and the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the owners and proprietors; and Whereas, said final plat and subdivision are found to conform with Chapter 354, Code of Iowa (2021) and all other state and local requirements. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, lowa, that: The said final plat and subdivision located on the above -described real estate be and the same are hereby approved. 2. The City accepts the dedication of the neighborhood open space, public improvements, and easements as provided by law. The City shall accept dedication of the neighborhood open space, public improvements, and easements upon satisfaction of the terms and conditions stated in the Subdivider's Agreement. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of lowa City, Iowa, are hereby authorized and directed, upon approval by the City Attorney, to execute all legal documents relating to said subdivision, and to certify a copy of this resolution, which shall be affixed to the final plat after passage and approval by law. The City Clerk shall record the legal documents and the plat at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa at the expense of the owner. Passed and approved this 10th day of January , 2023. Resolutipt!lo.:23:-,13 Page? c.-041 Attest: City Clerk It was moved by Dunn adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Approved by City Attome Office (Liz Craig — 01/05/2023) B and seconded by Bergus the Resolution be Nays: Absent: x Alter Bergus _x_ Harmsen x Taylor Teague Thomas " Dunn \ Item Number: 7.a. CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org January 10, 2023 Motion setting a public hearing for January 24, 2023 on a resolution to amend the Southwest District Plan, a part of Iowa City's Comprehensive Plan, to update background information and the concept for the Rohret South Subarea. (CPA22-0002) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Packet for 12-07-22 P&Z Minutes 11-16-22 P&Z Minutes 12-07-22 Additional Correspondence - Dan Black I l I =ipZiEm7q4A,‘,. ••;1141.1iiii cm mg:1r CITY OF 101NA CITY CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: November 16, 2022 [includes upd' t f^ Attachments 1 & 2 for December 7 meeting] To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kirk Lehmann, Associate Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA22-0002) to update the Southwest District Plan, including background information and the future land use map for the Rohret South Subarea Introduction First adopted in 2002, the Southwest District Plan guides future development for land south of Melrose Avenue, west of the Iowa River, and north of Highway 1, to the western edge of the City's growth area. The Southwest District is divided into 4 subareas as shown in Figure 1. Of these, the Rohret South subarea has experienced the least development due to a lack of urban infrastructure. In 2023, the City will extend wastewater infrastructure west of U.S. Highway 218 which will allow development at urban densities in the Rohret South subarea. For a full version of the current plan, visit www.icgov.orq/districtplans. Figure 1. Southwest Planning District Subarea Map • • I,d F-1 ROSFFV a 11'illola ('reek Subarea Rohret South Subarea Staff developed the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA22-0002), shown in Attachment 1, to incorporate form -based land use patterns into the Rohret South subarea future land use map as well as to update background information. The purpose is to help ensure the plan continues to align with the policies, preferences, and circumstances in Iowa City today prior to development. In addition, the amendment will help encourage a diversity of housing types at a compatible scale and the development of compact and connected neighborhoods. It also supports other goals of City Council, including those related to equity and climate action. Background The Southwest District Plan is one of 10 district plans incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan, Iowa City 2030, which serves as the roadmap for directing growth and development in Iowa November 16, 2022 Page 2 City. Adopted in 2013, IC2030 describes a broad vision for the future of the City and provides guidance on planning issues to achieve that vision over time. District plans provide more detailed direction to address the unique issues and opportunities in each of the City's planning districts. One of the City's primary tools in implementing its Comprehensive and District Plans is the Zoning Code, which provides rules for how land can be used and developed, including what structures can be built where, and how they will be used. Conventional zoning codes focus first on regulating land use (e.g. residential, commercial, or industrial), and secondly on related standards such as density of dwelling units, maximum heights, lot coverage, and minimum on -site parking. Form - based codes differ by focusing less on land use and more on the scale of development (e.g. bulk and height) and its relationship to the public realm. The intent is to produce neighborhoods that: • Are safe for pedestrians and encourage walking; • Will preserve important environmental resources; • Contain a connected network of streets and paths; and • Allow for a variety of housing types and price -points. The City adopted a form -based code for use in undeveloped areas in 2021 after multiple years partnering with Opticos Design. However, the City must amend its district plans to implement form -based future land use categories in its growth areas. The South District Plan was the first to incorporate form -based land use categories, and staff identified the Southwest District as an appropriate next step because growth is anticipated once infrastructure is extended in 2023. Due to this and the current plan's age, an update utilizing a form -based future land use map is prudent prior to annexation and development. Process The City's targeted update of the Southwest District Plan focuses on background information and the concept for the Rohret South Subarea. Figure 2 summarizes outreach conducted as part of this process. Full summaries of the survey, focus group, and public open house responses are included in Attachment 3. Regular correspondence and additional interviews and group conversations were also conducted throughout the planning period. Over the course of the project, staff has maintained a contact list which currently exceeds 225 email addresses. Figure 2: Public Outreach Summar Public Events Date Approx. # Participants Focus Group Meetings (Property owners, city-wide stakeholders, government & neighborhood organizations, Iowa City Community School District, and Development Community) Dec. 2020 & Jan. 2021 31 Public Survey Dec. 2020 — Jul. 2022 168 Parks & Recreation Commission Jan. 2021 7 Additional Meetings with Landowners/Stakeholders Apr. 2021 - Present 11 Party in the Park Aug. 2022 41 Public Open House Sep. 2022 117 City Staff Technical Committee Throughout 8 Note: Many individuals likely participated in multiple public outreach events. Initial outreach was conducted through winter 2020 and spring 2021. The City began the process by engaging the public through a mix of surveys, individual interviews, and focus group meetings. The survey was publicized by mailings to nearly 800 owners and occupants near the subarea and word-of-mouth. Focus group participants were selected to include representatives from the local November 16, 2022 Page 3 development community, local governmental entities, property owners, neighborhood organizations, and other area and city-wide stakeholders. Staff also met several times with the Iowa City Community School District to understand future facility needs in the area, as well as with property owners and others that indicated an interest in the process. Following initial outreach efforts, staff reviewed the plan's original concept map and identified a need to incorporate form -based future land use categories and the new fringe area adopted in 2021. However, planning efforts paused following the unsuccessful Carson Farms annexation until more direction was available regarding the area's future. Upon resuming work in 2022, staff again collaborated with Opticos Design to develop a land use and street framework. After drafting a future land use map, staff attended the Party in the Park event at Hunter's Run and held a public open house on September 1, 2022 which was attended by approximately 117 participants. Following the open house, staff made several revisions in response to public input, including: Removing some through -streets; Adding alleys along certain primary streets; Redesignating the 100-year floodplain to the west as private open space; Reducing the size of the northeast neighborhood center's Transect 4 Main Street area; Shifting the locations of neighborhood centers in the southeast and northwest; Expanding Transect 3 Neighborhood Edge areas near Weber Elementary and Kitty Lee Road and adjusting some other boundaries; and Reconfiguring road networks for efficiency and in response to other changes. Following the meeting, staff published the public adoption draft plan on October 19, 2022. Written comments received throughout the process are discussed later in the correspondence section of this memo. Some subsequent changes to the draft plan after the public hearing was set include: Specifying "Historic" Poor Farm; Specifying which curvilinear streets have had recent complaints; Discussing the lack of pedestrian facilities around intersection of Riverside and Highways 1 and 6, along with the Highway 6 Bridge over the Iowa River; and Adding street labels to the future land use and thoroughfare maps. Written comments will continue to be accepted until a decision by City Council. Proposed Amendment: The proposed amendment includes changes to the Southwest District Plan that help ensure the document contains up-to-date information and a refreshed vision for the Rohret South subarea that is consistent with current City policy and preferences prior to development. First, background information was updated throughout the plan. Changes in the introduction are limited to a description of the update process and references to the 2013 Comprehensive Plan. Updates to the Past and Present section include new maps that reflect the 2021 Fringe Area Agreement, and revisions to subsections on Housing, Public Institutions, Transportation, Commercial Development, and Parks and Open Space reflecting changes in circumstance over the past two decades. Updates to background information in the Planning for the Future section are similar to those made to the Past and Present Section, including revised descriptions in the Transportation and Public Services and Facilities subsections, in addition to updated subarea maps. There are some minor modifications in the Planning Principles subsection, but they are limited to a reference to IC2030 and to removing a reference to the Carson Lake concept plan. The more substantive changes to the plan are to the subsection on the Rohret South subarea. Goals for the subarea were not changed, but the future land use map was revised to utilize November 16, 2022 Page 4 categories based on form rather than land use and the area was expanded to reflect the 2021 Fringe Area Agreement. A subsection was also added to explain the land use philosophy and its implementation in the Southwest District. The new future land use map, which includes a thoroughfare map, continues to meet the goals of the original plan but will guide development in a way that better reflects current land use policy. The text in this section was also modified to better achieve intended outcomes in the subarea, including changes to the subsections on public services and facilities, new neighborhoods, housing, transportation, and neighborhood centers (formerly commercial development). While form -based standards generally align with the existing policies in the Southwest District Plan, these changes address any discrepancies in between conventional and form -based development and better align with more recent policy decisions regarding future development in Iowa City. Analysis The Iowa City Comprehensive Plan serves as a land use planning guide by illustrating and describing the location and configuration of land uses envisioned throughout the City, providing notification to the public regarding intended uses of land; and illustrating the long-range growth area limit for the City. The City Council may consider amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. For a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to be approved, evidence must be provided that the request meets the following two approval criteria in Section 14-8D-3D of the City Code. 1. Circumstances have changed and/or additional information or factors have come to light such that the proposed amendment is in the public interest. Since the Southwest District Plan's adoption two decades ago, there have been numerous changes within Iowa City. In addition to the City's continued growth and development, City regulation and policy has also evolved significantly. From 2000 to 2020, Iowa City added more than 12,600 new residents of which more than 2,700 occurred west of Mormon Trek Boulevard. This growth included subdivisions such as Galway Hills, County Club Estates, Wild Prairie Estates, and West Side Estates. Consequently, almost all land in the Southwest District east of Highway 218 is now fully developed, and some areas near Riverfront Crossings West are even experiencing redevelopment. Additionally, new major street connections have been built since the plan was adopted, including Camp Cardinal Boulevard to the north and McCollister Boulevard to the south, and other changes have also occurred such as the closure of Roosevelt Elementary School. At the same time, annexations with a residential component decreased from 825 new acres in the 1990s to 115 new acres in the 2010s with most recent development occurring on previously annexed land. Growth is expected to continue in the future with an estimated 19,265 new residents moving to Iowa City between 2020 and 2040.1 As residential land that was previously annexed is now largely developed, and as sewer service expands under Highway 218, it becomes prudent to review future development patterns in the Rohret South subarea, which remains largely agricultural with some rural residential and institutional uses. These factors constitute major changes since the plan was adopted in 2002. In addition, the City has adopted several major regulatory changes. The City overhauled its Zoning Code in 2005 and updated its Subdivision Code in 2008. In 2021, the City also expanded its growth area through the Fringe Area Agreement with Johnson County and adopted a form - based code with the intent of applying it in greenfield growth areas. Changes to land use regulations have a direct impact on what can be built where, and how it can be built, so these changes alone make it worthwhile to review and revise the plan to ensure its consistency with the current regulatory framework. Future Forward 2050: Long Range Transportation Plan, Metropolitan Planning Organization of Johnson County, adopted May 25, 2022. November 16, 2022 Page 5 Furthermore, other policy changes since 2002, including a new Comprehensive Plan update and an increased focus on climate action and equity, constitute additional circumstances that have occurred and that demonstrate the proposed amendment is in the public interest. The City adopted the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan in 2013. While it maintains the planning framework of the previous Comprehensive Plan, it incorporates sustainability as foundational to the plan's structure and includes revised goals and strategies related to growth, land use, housing, economic development, and transportation, among others. In 2018, the City adopted a Climate Action & Adaptation Plan with goals to reduce carbon emissions by 45% by 2030 and to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Form -based land use can help address issues associated with conventional land use planning that have historically led to separated land uses and low density spawl. The development patterns associated with conventional land use planning encourages auto -oriented development and increases traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions. On the other hand, form -based land use planning can improve the building and transportation systems through compact neighborhoods with destinations that are easily accessible by foot, bike, and bus in addition to cars. In 2020, the City adopted actions in Resolution 20-159 to enhance social justice and racial equity in the community. Historically, conventional zoning regulations have been used to enforce racial and class segregation through exclusionary practices such as single-family only zoning and large minimum lot sizes, along with other policies such as redlining, restrictive covenants, and the demolition of "slums" where persons of color lived. Form -based land use helps address these past wrongs by permitting a diversity of housing types and price points. While it does not solve this complex issue, it mitigates one barrier to providing housing options that are more affordable and allows for a broader range of housing choices for all residents, including those still recovering from generations of targeted exclusion and disinvestment. 2. The proposed amendment will be compatible with other policies or provisions of the comprehensive plan, including any district plans or other amendments thereto. The proposed amendment aligns well with the existing goals and objectives in the Southwest District and Comprehensive Plans. The adopted future land use map of the Comprehensive Plan shows the area as containing residential land uses, primarily at a density of 2-8 dwelling units per acre, but with some areas shown as rural residential. It also includes a small area with neighborhood commercial and mixed use development, along with some public/semi-public uses and open space, though this is limited to only a small portion of the Rohret South subarea. Similarly, the current Southwest District Future Land Use map shows a mix of land use categories in the subarea, including Large Lot/Rural Residential, Single-Family/Duplex Residential, Narrow Lot/Townhouse Residential, Mixed Use, Neighborhood Commercial, Open Space, and Public Services/Institutional Uses, among others. The proposed future land use map maintains many of the same land use and building types but allows a mix of them throughout the area instead of segregating different housing types by area. It also looks at the full subarea rather than only those areas expected to develop first. However, the new map does not include rural residential uses as it is now expected that these land uses will be annexed into the City over time. The proposed amendment also supports several goals from the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan: • Ensure a mix of housing types within each neighborhood, to provide options for households of all types (singles, families, retirees, etc.) and people of all incomes. • Encourage pedestrian -oriented development and attractive and functional streetscapes that make it safe, convenient, and comfortable to walk. • Plan for commercial development in defined commercial nodes, including small-scale neighborhood commercial centers. • Support preservation of valuable farmland, open space, and environmentally sensitive areas. • Ensure that future parks have visibility and access from the street. November 16, 2022 Page 6 • Discourage parks that are surrounded by private property; encourage development of parks with single -loaded street access. Similarly, the plan continues to use the same goals of the Southwest District Plan for the Rohret South subarea, which align with proposed changes to the text and future land use map: • Encourage housing diversity in new neighborhoods. • Preserve natural features and topography. • Build streets that enhance neighborhood quality. • Encourage commercial development that serves local residents. • Reserve space for neighborhood parks and trails that connect to other areas of the City. • Provide adequate street and pedestrian access to recreational facilities and other public amenities. • Establish a public focal point for new neighborhoods, such as a lake or park. On the other hand, amendments related to the background section are relatively minor or simply provide more accurate context due to the significant changes since 2002. In addition to being compatible with the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan and existing goals of the Southwest District Plan, the proposed amendment aligns well with other more recent policy efforts of the City, including the City Council's Strategic Plan, the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, and the City's Black Lives Matter & Systemic Racism Resolution. As other District Plans are updated in the future, incorporating these elements is essential to ensuring consistency in all City documents. Public Comment Staff received several comments regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, a few of which were received after the hearing was set. All comments are included in Attachment 2. Next Steps At an upcoming meeting of City Council, a public hearing must be held on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA22-0002) to update background information and the section on the Rohret South Subarea. Following the hearing, Council will determine whether to adopt the proposed amendment. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of CPA22- 0002, a proposed amendment to the Southwest District Plan to update background information and the section on the Rohret South Subarea, as proposed in Attachment 1. Attachments 1. Proposed Changes to the South District Plan [includes minor correction on p. 12] 2. Correspondence [includes 3 messages not in November 16, 2022 packet] 3. Open House Comments & Survey Results 4. Public Input Summary Approved by: T • St - Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Attachment 1 SOUTHWEST DISTRICT PLAN ADOPTED OCTOBER 8, 2002 AMENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2021 AMENDED XXXXXXXX XX, 2022 r 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY Department of Planning and Community Development 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 SOUTHWEST DISTRICT PLAN ADOPTED OCTOBER 8, 2002 AMENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2021 AMENDED XXXXXXXX XX, 2022 � � 1 I 14 at CITY OF IOWA CITY Department of Planning and Community Development 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 www.icgov.org City Council of Iowa City Ernest W. Lehman, Mayor Dee Vanderhoef, Mayor Pro Tem Connie Champion Steven Kanner Mike O'Donnell Irvin Pfab Ross Wilburn Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission Ann Bovbjerg, Chair Dean Shannon, Vice Chair Jerry Hansen, Secretary Donald J. Anciaux, Jr. Benjamin Chait Ann Freerks Elizabeth Koppes Department of Planning and Community Development Karin Franklin, Director Jeff Davidson, Assistant Director Robert Miklo, Senior Planner Karen Howard, Associate Planner Shelley McCafferty, Associate Planner John Yapp, Associate Planner John Adam, Associate Planner Kay Irelan, Graphics Tech Erin Welsch, Intern INTRODUCTION The Iowa City Comprehensive Plan presents a vision for Iowa City, provides a strategy for realizing the vision, and sets policies for the growth and development of specific geographic areas of the city. Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1997, and its update in 2013, the City has embarked on a series of District Planning efforts in order to provide vision and guidance for development that is more closely tailored to specific areas of the City. District plans are intended to promote patterns of land use, urban design, infrastructure, and services that encourage and contribute to the livability of Iowa City and its neighborhoods. District plans are advisory documents for directing and managing change over time. They serve as guides to decision -making, public deliberation, and investments. The Southwest District Plan establishes planning principles, goals and objectives that relate specifically to the history and existing conditions of specific areas within Southwest Iowa City. The plan addresses issues of housing, transportation, commercial development, public and neighborhood services, and parks, trails and open space. Since the Southwest Planning District includes older neighborhoods, new subdivisions, and also areas that have yet to be developed, it is difficult to establish specific goals and objectives that would apply to all areas of the district. Therefore, the plan divides the district into four subareas: the Roosevelt Subarea, the Willow Creek Subarea, the Weber Subarea, and the Rohret South Subarea. While there are basic planning principles that apply to the entire Southwest District, the plan highlights specific issues and corresponding goals and objectives for each of the four subareas and illustrates a vision for future land use on plan maps for each subarea. The planning principles, goals, and objectives within this plan are intended to be consistent with community -wide goals and policies that are embodied in the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan. Establishing sound planning principles and a vision for the future will benefit citizens living or working in the Southwest District as well as citizens in Iowa City as a whole. The Plan is divided into two sections: The Southwest District: Past and Present, which describes the location, history and existing conditions in the Southwest District; II. The Southwest District: Planning for the Future, which sets forth the planning principles, goals and objectives that will act as a framework on which to base future development decisions. This section includes a discussion of district -wide issues such as transportation and public infrastructure as well as more detailed guidelines for each of the four subareas in the district. Plan maps and concept plans in this section help to illustrate plan goals and objectives. Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 1 Planning Process The Southwest District Plan is based on the input of many individuals, neighborhood groups, and other interested organizations. During the summer and fall of 2001, staff from the City's Department of Planning and Community Development collected background information about the area through historical research, interviews, and site visits. To kick off the public process, the City sent over 5,000 individual notices to invite area residents to a planning workshop on November 8, 2001. The workshop was also promoted through area schools, on the City's website and in the local newspaper. Over 200 citizens responded to this outreach effort and requested to be kept informed of the planning process as it unfolded. At the first workshop, participants used the background information gathered by city staff to inform their own knowledge and experience as they worked to formulate a vision for the district. Approximately 100 citizens spent the evening examining issues relating to housing, commercial development, transportation, parks and open space, and discussed ways to make the district more livable over time. On February 5, 2002, citizens met at a second workshop to build on the work accomplished in November. Participants worked in small groups to develop more specific goals and objectives for the plan. It became apparent during the workshop process that more specific direction was needed for different geographical areas in the district. A plan for the development of new neighborhoods was needed for the outlying areas of the district, while existing zoning, traffic, and redevelopment issues are a priority for inner neighborhoods and commercial areas. In addition, specific recommendations were requested by the City Council for the area bounded by Miller Avenue, Benton Street, Harlocke Street, and Highway 1. This area was placed under a development moratorium to allow time to complete a planning study to determine the most appropriate zoning and land uses for the remaining undeveloped land. A Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 2 smaller working group of citizens and planning staff was formed to help identify specific concerns and discuss possible scenarios for future development. The planning principles, plan maps, and concept plans contained in this document were developed from the public input gathered throughout the planning process. Citizens generated many of the specific policies and design concepts in the plan. A draft plan was presented to the public in July of 2002. The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and discussed the plan with citizens at several public hearings in August and September and forwarded their recommended draft to the City Council for review and adoption. The City Council discussed the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended draft at a public hearing in September. After consideration of public comments, the City Council adopted the Southwest District Plan on October 8, 2002, making it an integral part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. In winter 2020, the City began a targeted update of the plan focused on background information and the Rohret South Subarea. The goal was to vision what future development may look utilizing form -based zones for greenfield sites in light of the planned wastewater service extension under Highway 218 in 2023. Public input was gained throughout the project timeline, including a public open house on September 1, 2022. The draft plan was posted in October 2022, after which the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and recommended XXXXX of the draft update at a public hearing in November. After considering public comments at a public hearing, City Council XXXXXX the Plan Update on XXXXX XXX, 2022. How Will the Southwest District Plan Be Used? The Southwest District Plan is intended to be a guide to development within the district for the next twenty to twenty-five years. As the City reviews subdivision and rezoning requests, the plan will be consulted to help ensure that new development fits into the surrounding neighborhoods. The City will refer to the Plan when setting funding priorities for public projects and services. Property owners, developers and others may also use the plan when making decisions regarding investment in the Southwest District. Continued citizen input will be important during the implementation of the plan. Private investment and neighborhood initiatives to enhance or improve housing and commercial areas and to protect valuable environmental and historic resources will be essential to the implementation of the Southwest District Plan. Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 3 1 Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 4 The Southwest District Past and Present ♦ Location ♦ History & Existing Conditions Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 5 LOCATION \I =MI Ism —ter — -- - Southwest Plan ► g District t I , __if: The Southw- - Planning District extends from the Iowa River west to t ity's western • th area limit. It is bounded on the north by Melrose Avenue a Grand Aven - : nd on the south by Iowa Highway 1. In the mid-1990's the City's gr• h areit was expanded westward to the future alignment of Highway 965, whi ill ntually skirt the eastern edge of the Iowa City Landfill. Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 6 LOCATION Southwest Planning District The Southwest Planning District extends from the Iowa River west to the City's western growth area limit. It is bounded on the north by Melrose Avenue and Grand Avenue and on the south by Iowa Highway 1. In the mid-1990's the City's growth area limit was expanded westward to the future alignment of Highway 965, which will eventually skirt the eastern edge of the Iowa City Landfill. The growth area limit was further expanded in 2021 to account for new anticipated growth which added 'lust over 712 acres of land in the western and southern portions of the Southwest Planning District. Southwest District Plan 1 0/08/021 1 /07/22 6 1111121111111 IVIALIAlbon ECCREU ENE=EN Dorm MIME' 0 DOES Effm1i1DU C] ❑ LIMNER 1 rti CN CN CD CN CO rf CD w cr 1 Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 8 HISTORY AND EXISTING CONDITIONS The Southwest District consists primarily of residential development, although it also contains important commercial areas along Riverside Drive, Highway 1 and Mormon Trek Boulevard. The residential neighborhoods and commercial areas are linked to the rest of Iowa City by a network of arterial streets and regional trails, including Melrose Avenue, Benton Street, Rohret Road, Mormon Trek Boulevard, Riverside Drive, the Willow Creek Trail, and the Iowa River Corridor Trail. Along Melrose Avenue the District abuts University Heights, which is incorporated as a separate city. The land use map on the previous page is provided as a reference. It indicates the various land uses in existence at the time this plan was updated in August 2022. Land uses remain similar to when the plan was originally drafted in June 2002developed. Housing The map on the following page illustrates the existing development pattern in the Southwest District. As one can see from this map, the residential uses in the District range from low -density single-family homes to high -density apartments in areas along the north side of Benton Street and along Mormon Trek Boulevard. While the area located east of Highway 218 is nearly completely developed, the area west of the highway contains low -density single-family subdivisions bordering large areas of agricultural land. While much of the land south of Rohret Road and west of Highway 218 is still used as farmland, vestiges of early country living still remain in the eastern part of the district along Melrose Avenue and Benton Street. The earliest -known house of record is at 817 Melrose Avenue. Two blocks east is the Billingsley-Hills-Widness house at 629 Melrose Avenue, which was originally a 34-acre country estate. Constructed in 1870, this Italianate structure is one of three former estates on Melrose Avenue listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The other two houses are the Cannon -Gay and Pratt -Soper houses at 320 and 503 Melrose Avenue, respectively. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 9 There are also a number of historic houses on Benton Street, including the Williams- Unash house located just east of Roosevelt School at 602 W. Benton Street, and the Cyrus S. Ranck house at 747 W. Benton Street, which was recently designated an Iowa City Landmark. Built at the turn of the century, the house was originally surrounded by a 22-acre orchard. The current owners continue to maintain a large part of this property as natural woodland. The property across from the school was once occupied by another historic brick structure, the William Butterbaugh house, which was built in 1884 on a 160-acre farm. Behind the house were several barns and other farm structures. In 1925 Charles W. Ruppert, Sr. purchased the property and rented it to William Sanger who operated a dairy farm at this location. The Rupperts still own portions of the original farm, however the house was abandoned and eventually demolished. It is now developed and includes the Prairie Hill Co -Housing project and a new public parkThe Ruppert property is one of the few large, undeveloped tracts remaining in the eastern part of the District. The earliest subdivisions within the Southwest District were developed between 1921 and 1924 in the area south of Melrose Avenue and north of the former Rock Island Railroad and Myrtle Avenue. These included Melrose Place, Circle and Court, as well as Brookland Place, Brookland Park, and Triangle Place. This neighborhood has narrow streets, and a wooded, rugged character that makes it intimate and distinct. Another early subdivision occurred along Miller and Hudson Avenues south of Benton Street. Many of the homes along these streets were built as a part of the Baily and Beck Addition, which was platted in 1927. Much of the area along Benton and Orchard Streets was platted in the late 1940s. A World War II aviation manufacturer constructed the small ranch -style homes along Douglas Street and Douglas Court, which was platted in 1954. Further development in the 1950s took place between Myrtle Avenue and the Iowa Interstate Railway (formerly the Rock Island Railway). Others areas south of Melrose Avenue and north of Highway 1 continued to develop through the 1970s in a rather ad hoc manner. Another factor in the development of Southwest Iowa City was an increasing need to house university students. The University expanded its west side dormitory space with the construction of Rienow Hall and Slater Hall in the late 1960s. In addition, a number of apartment blocks were developed among the small subdivisions. The Seville, Carriage Hill and Benton Manor apartment complexes were constructed at the top of the Benton Street Hill. Apartment complexes were constructed around "University Lake" between University Heights to the north and Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 10 1960s-era single-family neighborhoods to the south. Additional apartment blocks were built along Oakcrest Street. Larger subdivisions in the Southwest District were not platted until after the 1960s. From the late 60s through the 70s, most of the area south of Benton Street and east of Willow Creek Park was platted and built. The subdivisions west of Willow Creek Park were all platted in the last two decades of the twentieth century. In the western portion of the Southwest District, development is occurring primarily in the area north of Rohret Road. The Galway Hills subdivision continues to was developed north of near the intersection of Highway 218 and Melrose Avenue. A new retirement community was recently constructed in this vicinity, directly adjacent to West High School. West of Highway 218, Wild Prairie Estates and Country Club Estates continue their build -out near Weber Elementary School. Urban development is not likeslowly t -expanded very quickly south of Rohret Road due to the difficulty in providing sanitary sewer service. Many of thcSome homes in this area are located outside the city limits in Johnson County. These residences have private wells and their own septic systems. Since this plan was original adopted in 2002, the Southwest District experienced additional development. Almost all land east of Highway 218 is now built out, and areas near the Iowa River and University have seen significant redevelopment following adoption of the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code in 2013. West of Highway 218 and north of Rohret Road, Country Club Estates and VUId Prairie Estates continued to grow, and additional development is expected in the Rohret South Subarea following the planned extension of sewer service under Highway 218 in 2023. Public Institutions The Southwest District is home to a number of public institutions that serve the community. These institutions are markers of the district's individuality. Not only do they serve the citizens of the Southwest District, but they also bring people from other areas of the city to the district. The University of Iowa has a significant presence in the northeast part of the district, including the Boyd Law Building overlooking the Iowa River, several parking lots, and scattered properties along Melrose Avenue used as rental property and child daycare. In addition, the University influences development in the Southwest District because it owns much of the property directly north of the District, including the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, the Colleges of Medicine, Pharmacy, Dentistry, and Nursing, the university's athletic facilities, and several dormitories. The Iowa City Community School District has a number of schools in southwest Iowa City. Both Roosevelt and Horn elementary school ism located along Benton Street. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 11 Roosevelt elementary school was also on Benton Street until 2012, after which it was converted into an education center and was subsequently decommissioned in 2019. West High School has a large campus along Melrose Avenue and Weber Elementary School is located in the western part of the district along Rohret Road. These schools serve both educational and community purposes and are often a gathering place for people in the surrounding neighborhoods. One of the Southwest District's largest undeveloped properties is owned by Johnson County and was formerly the site of an important public institution. Located on Melrose Avenue near Slothower Road, the Johnson County Historic Poor Farm provided care to those who were unable to care for themselves, including both the indigent and the mentally disabled, from the 1850s until the 1960s. The intent was for the farm to be partially self- supporting. From its earliest days, farming was an important part of its operations. Residents of the historic poor farm were expected to do what farm chores they could manage in order to compensate the county for their care. In 1964, a newer facility was built on the site. Chatham Oaks, a privately run institution for persons with mental illness, is currently housed in this building. Johnson County continues to own and maintain the property and IAaQAQ the remaining farmland to a local farmer. In 1977, the remaining wing of the original 1859 asylum building was listed on the National Register of Historic Places. This structure was restored by the County and opened to the public in 1990. In addition to the historic asylum building, a number of early farm buildings and the Historic Poor Farm cemetery are notable features of the site. Since a master planning effort in 2016, the County has hosted the Land Access Program which leases plots for small farming operations and has also leased space to various nonprofits including GROW: Johnson County, which grows and donates foods to local pantries, and the Iowa Global Food Project, which provides garden spaces for immigrant communities to grow their native foods. Southwest District Plan 11/22/2210/08/02 12 Transportation Melrose Avenue, Benton Street, Highway 1, Riverside Drive, Mormon Trek Boulevard and Rohret Road form the backbone of the transportation network in the Southwest District. These arterial streets serve two important functions, to provide travel routes for vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians through and to different parts of the community, and to provide access to adjacent properties via collector and local streets. Highway 218, which cuts diagonally through the district, also provides access to the southwest portion of Iowa City, although its primary function is to serve motorists travelling through the metropolitan area. Many of these streets were also important in the early development of the district. Melrose Avenue was once called Snooks Grove Road and known popularly as the Poor Farm Road. Snooks Grove was a settlement located on Bear Creek in Poweshiek County. The residents of Snooks Grove Road eventually rebelled and it was renamed Melrose Avenue. This name became the basis for the naming of Melrose Place, Melrose Circle and Melrose Court. However, the origin of "Melrose" is not known. The topography in certain areas along Benton Street is quite steep. For years, what is now referred to as the Benton Street Hill was called Ranck Hill. The steep hill has always been difficult in the winter months. Irving Weber notes accounts of Roosevelt schoolteachers having to "gun" their engines and push their vehicles to reach the school. To the children living in the area, however, the hill was a popular location for sledding until 1952, when the City paved it. The sledding hill on Benton Street Rohret Road was named for Bavarian immigrant Wolfgang Rohret. He, his wife Katrina, and four sons had staked out a claim along Old Man's Creek in 1840. Wolfgang and his sons traveled the early road daily to and from Iowa City and their employment as construction workers on the new state capitol building. The Rohret sons were later hired by Lyman Dillon to plow the 100-mile-long Dillon's Furrow between Iowa City and Dubuque. In 1856, Iowa City was the westernmost stop for the railroad. During that year, five parties of Mormon converts from England, Scotland, Wales, Norway, and Denmark passed through Iowa City on their trek to Salt Lake City, Utah, which they believed to be the promised land. The first party arrived in May and they spent four weeks at a camp along Clear Creek. While encamped, they built handcarts for hauling their belongings on the continuation of their journey. By the end of July, the last party left Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 13 Iowa City for Utah with their handcarts in tow. Because of the late start, however, they encountered severe winter weather, and between 135 and 150 died en route. Legend has it that five Mormon graves are located near their Iowa City camp, but none have yet been discovered. The Mormon Handcart Park and Trail commemorate this camp and Mormon Trek Boulevard was named in honor of their journey. The decision in the late 1970s to construct Highway 218 as a diagonally -routed, limited -access highway through southwestern Iowa City has had, and will continue to have, a major influence on development in this part of the city. Highway 218 forms part of what will eventually be the "Avenue of the Saints," an expressway between Saint Paul, Minnesota and Saint Louis, Missouri. While providing an important transportation route, Highway 218 is a substantial barrier separating the neighborhoods southwest of it from the rest of Iowa City. Melrose Avenue, Rohret Road, and Highway 1 are the only streets that bridge across the highway. Integrating and connecting the neighborhoods west of Highway 218 to the rest of the community will remain a challenge as the City develops westward. Trail connections under the roadbed may help to integrate new neighborhoods into the community and provide connections to important destinations, such as West High School, on the east side of the highway. Additional north -south street connections between Melrose Avenue, Rohret Road and Highway 1 will improve traffic circulation within the area and will help to connect these westernmost neighborhoods with neighborhoods east of the highway. Improvements to Melrose Avenue, Mormon Trek Boulevard, and Rohret Road in the past decade have improved the capacity of the arterial street system in western Iowa City. While there is some congestion on portions of Benton Street and Mormon Trek Boulevard near the University of Iowa campus during peak hours, level of service is generally adequate. However, there are still opportunities to better control access to improve safetyinsufficicnt capacity and poor acccsc control along strccts such as Benton east of Sunset Street and along portions of Riverside Drive contribute to congestion delay and acrid entc As development continues west of Mormon Trek Boulevard and along Highway 1, the demands on the arterial street system will increase. High vehicle speeds have been reported along lonq curvilinear streets near West High and in Southwest Estates, especially on streets like Lakeshore Drive and Duck Creek Drive. As a result, plans to connect Edinqale Drive to Highway 1 have been met with some concern. As the property at 1160 Highway 1 West redevelops, attention must be Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 14 given to traffic calming and connectivity to Horn Elementary, West High, and the University. Commercial Development The Southwest District contains extensive commercial development along Highway 1 and on Riverside Drive. Much of this development is in the form of commercial strips. Larger businesses line the Highway 1 corridor and provide goods and services to the greater Iowa City area. South Riverside Drive is composed of smaller commercial lots with many individual access drives off of the roadway, making it seem busier and more congested. The Riverside Drive commercial area has a long history and is in many ways the very model of post - World War II commercial strip development. The area was annexed in the 1920s and remained mostly residential for the next couple of decades. Following the war, households began moving out and businesses began moving in, finally outnumbering homes by 1959 and reaching saturation around 1970. Contributing to this was Riverside's changing transportation role over the years. It served as the converged route of State Highway 1 and U.S. Highways 6 and 218 and as the southern entryway into Iowa City. This made it an attractive place to locate filling stations and other auto -service uses and auto -oriented uses, such as fast-food restaurants. The growth of residential neighborhoods in areas to the west, the expansion of commercial uses along Highway 1 West and Highway 6 East, and the reorientation of Highway 218 far to the west in the 1980s effectively displaced Riverside Drive from its former entryway role. Since the adoption of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan in 2013, several redevelopment projects have occurred on Riverside Drive which have improved the appearance and functionality of the street, provided additional commercial amenities, and new added residents along the corridor. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 15 The Southwest District also contains a smaller neighborhood commercial area called Walden Square. This compact shopping center is located on Mormon Trek Boulevard near its intersection with Benton Street. Walden Square includes a neighborhood grocery store, several retail shops and restaurants, and a credit union. Unlike commercial development along Highway 1 and Riverside Drive, which relies primarily on attracting drive -by customers from the entire Iowa City area, the primary focus at Walden Square is to provide for the everyday shopping needs of the surrounding neighborhoods. While parking spaces are prevalent at Walden Square, neighborhood residents can also ride their bikes or walk to these shops via the Willow Creek Trail, which runs adjacent to this development. In addition, the Southwest District has seen significant commercial development at the intersection of Highway 1 and Highway 218. These developments, which are primarily large commercial uses including car lots and home and garden stores, were driven by the extension of Mormon Trek Boulevard from Highway 1 to South Riverside Drive. Parks and Open Space The Southwest District contains a number of regional and neighborhood parks. Willow Creek Park and Kiwanis Park together provide a large regional park facility that not only serves the surrounding neighborhoods on the west side of the City, but also attracts users from other parts of town. The Iowa River Corridor Trail skirts the eastern boundary of the district. The newly developed Ned Ashton Park, located at the corner of Benton Street and Riverside Drive, provides a neighborhood access point and resting area for the Iowa River Corridor Trail. Brookland Park, at the intersection of Greenwood Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railway, provides both active and passive recreational opportunities for the surrounding Melrose and Miller - Orchard neighborhoods. Tho City hac recentl„ acguirod propert„ al„ng Benton Street Hill Park across from the former Roosevelt Elementary +-was developea into a small park with play equipment and a shelter. Discussions continue as to how this park might best be developed to serve the surrounding residents. Tower Court Park is a small pocket park that is enjoyed by residents living along Tower Court and Oakcrest Street. Similarly, Harlocke Hill Park, acquired in 2004, is a small park serving its Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 16 neighborhood at the junction of Harlocke Place and Harlocke Street. Villa Park, located west of University Heights, contains both active and passive areas and also doubles as a stormwater detention facility. Hunters Run Park serves the westernmost neighborhoods of the district. It is located west of Highway 218 along Duck Creek Drive. While this park consists largely of natural areas with trails, improvements have recently been made to provide more active park space. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 17 The Southwest District Planning for the Future ♦ Planning Principles ♦ Transportation ♦ Public Services and Facilities ♦ Southwest District Subareas • Roosevelt Subarea • Willow Creek Subarea • Weber Subarea • Rohret South Subarea Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 18 PLANNING PRINCIPLES During the planning process, citizens discussed what was most valued in the Southwest District and those aspects that could use improvement. They also discussed principles that should be followed as new neighborhoods are developed in the future. Many of the specific ideas, concepts, and goals generated at the citizen planning workshops are included in the remaining sections of the plan. These principles also mirror those in the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan. The following citizen -generated principles provide the underlying framework for the plan: • Citizens stressed the importance of providing a diversity of housing in the District, including homes for first time buyers, mid -sized homes, estate -style homes, townhouses, condominiums and apartments. The appropriate design and mix of housing types is important to the creation of livable neighborhoods. • Citizens emphasized the importance of preserving and stabilizing close -in, diverse neighborhoods. Citizens expressed a desire for better enforcement of existing zoning and nuisance laws and a re-examination of existing zoning patterns in the older parts of the District. There is also concern about the encroachment of university uses into the neighborhoods south of Melrose Avenue. • Design issues are important to citizens. There was a desire expressed to establish design standards for higher density uses so that these uses would be well integrated into existing and future neighborhoods. Variety in building design is a desirable goal. Monotonous repetition of the same building along a street frontage or in a neighborhood should be discouraged. Citizens emphasized that buildings should be designed to be sensitive to the environment, the topography, and the surrounding development. • Citizens feel it is important to design new neighborhoods around a focal point such as a neighborhood commercial district, community center or park. The Carson L ako Future Land Use Map was developed with this principle in mind. • Citizens want to prevent sprawl and preserve the rural character of the far western and southern portions of the district. Although these areas are not likely to remain permanently in farm use, the plan encourages orderly growth. Urban densities should not occur until public facilities are in place and until areas adjacent to existing urban development are built out. • A safe, efficient network of streets is important to neighborhood residents. Emphasis should be placed on designing street networks that prevent cut -through traffic on local streets and provide safe travel routes for bicyclists and pedestrians. • Citizens emphasized the importance of providing good access to public transit. Expansion of transit service should be considered in areas where higher densities develop. • Trails, wide sidewalks, and bicycle lanes are viewed as important transportation links to neighborhood destinations. • With regard to parks, open space and trails, there is overwhelming support for creating an interconnected system of neighborhood and regional parks throughout the district. • Citizens expressed support for attractive, well -designed commercial areas that serve the daily needs of the surrounding residents. Design, accessibility, and types of commercial uses were important topics discussed at the workshops. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 19 TRANSPORTATION The transportation system in the Southwest District includes arterial streets, trails and wide sidewalks, and public transit. More detailed information about neighborhood transportation issues is included in the subarea sections below. Arterial Streets The only new arterial street corridor planned for within the Southwest District is the future extension of Highway 965 from Highway 6 to Melrose Avenue, and eventually to Highway 1. North of Melrose Avenue, the Highway 965 corridor will be located along the Hurt Road alignment and along the east side of the Iowa City Landfill south of Melrose Avenue. Highway 965 will not only provide an additional north -south link between Iowa City and Coralville, it will create an additional link in the regional arterial street system by connecting Highway 1 in Iowa City to Highway 6 in Coralville and beyond to North Liberty. While it's identified as a project in the most recent Long Range Transportation Plan, tThe extension of Highway 965 through the district is not expected to receive funding through at least 2045identified as a long range project, 20 to 25 years in the future. Sidewalk gaps along Riverside Drive Other planned arterial street extensions that affect- I traffic patterns in the Southwest District include the extension of Mormon Trek Boulevard from Highway 1 through the South Central Planning District to Riverside Drive, and Camp Cardinal Road Boulevard from Melrose Avenue north to Highway 6 in Coralville. The extension of Mormon Trek Boulevard to Riverside Drive in 2008 create ,i an additional east -west arterial street link, and traffic forecasts have shown it will likely result in a reduction in traffic on Benton Street. The extension of Camp Cardinal Road Boulevard between Melrose Avenue and Highway 6 in 2007 will created an additional north -south link between Iowa City and Coralville and will hclp rcduce dependence on Mormon Trek Boulevard and Highway 218 for north south traffic. The construction and improvements to these roads facilitated additional growth in the area. The City has also recently converted some 4-lane roads into 3-lane roads, including much of Mormon Trek Boulevard. New traffic counts are not yet available to show the impact of these changes due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic which substantially reduced traffic from 2020 to 2021. For existing arterial streets, segments of Benton Street. Highways 1 and 6. and Riverside Drive have been identified as needing improvement. Sidewalk gaps and Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 20 inadequate bicycle facilities make the area less safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. In addition, poor access control can be improved,contributes to the higher than average collision rate& especially along these street&Benton Street and Riverside Drive. As opportunities arise through redevelopment projects, a concerted effort should be made to fill in the sidewalk gaps, consolidate driveways and/or shift the location of driveways to safer locations. In the case of Highways 1 West/6 East, significant pedestrian improvements are needed near the intersection of Riverside Drive and on the bridge over the Iowa River. While the addition of vehicle travel lanes is not currently being contemplated, both Benton Street and Riverside Drive will periodically be evaluated for improved turning lanes, bicycle facilities, and traffic control. Traffic control devices, such as traffic signals or signs, may be warranted if they improve safety and/or traffic flow without having a negative impact on other neighborhood streets. Because traffic control devices have the potential to increase the collision rate and/or increase traffic on surrounding streets, a traffic engineering study needs to be completed before additional traffic control is added to an intersection. Public Transit As a result of the City's major transit study and overhaul of the bus lines in 2021, tThe Southwest District is now served by a number of Iowa City transit routes, including the 8 — Oakcrest, Westwinds, Plaen View, Westport, and 10 — West Side Loop Iowa City, and 12 — Highway 1 routes. The University of Iowa's CAMBUS provides service to the Hawkeye Park commuter lot and the University of Iowa Campus. The 8 — Oakcrest route serves Melrose Avenue, Sunset Street, and the residential areas along Oakcrest and Benton Streets with headways of 15 minutes during peak hours, 30 minutes during off-peak hours, and 60 minutes on Saturday. The 10 — West Iowa Cityport Route focuses directly serves residential, commercial, and institutional areas along Melrose Avenue, Mormon Trek Boulevard, and Rohret Road with headways of 30 minutes on weekdays and 60 minutes on Saturday. The 12 — Highway 1 serves Riverside Drive/Highway 6, the Highway 1 commercial area, Sunset Boulevard, Benton Street, and &the commercial/employment corridor& along Riverside Drivc and Highway 1 Westareas . The other routes provide general coverage to the predominately residential areas of the Southwest District, including the commercial nodes along on Mormon Trek Boulevard north of Benton Street with headways of 30 minutes during peak hours and Saturdays, and 60 minutes during off-peak hoursand the University of Iowa's Hgalth Sciences Campus. Each of these routes terminates at the Downtown Transit Interchange in Iowa City_, and tTransfers between routes can be made wherever routes overlap. As growth occurs in the Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 21 Southwest District west of Highway 218 and south of Rohret Road, additional changes to transit service may occur. Most of the transit routes operate on a standard schedule, with buses every half hour during the three hour morning and afternoon peak periods, and every hour the remainder of the day. The Westside Loop route is unique in that it operates only when public schools are open, and provides service to West High School and downtown Iowa City with one route in the morning and one route in the afternoon to serve high school students. Currently there are no plans to alter any of these routes, as they arc designed to give general coverage to the area where there is sufficient existing demand for transit service. The extension of trait service will be evaluated as thc population increases west of Highway 218. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian trails within the city are used both for recreation and as transportation routes. Three two regional major trails in -serve the Southwest District: include the Iowa River Corridor (IRC) Trail, the Highway 1 Trail, and the Willow Creek Trail. The IRC Trail, Iowa City's longest at six is part of a regional trail system that extends more than 12 miles, currently extends from Terry Trueblood Recreation Area to Benton Street on the west side of the Iowa River, where it crosses to the east side and continues south to Napoleon Parkthe Macbride Nature Area. Future plans include will extending the IRC Trail along the west side of the river from Benton Street south to Sturgis Ferry Ra-r-kMcCollister Boulevard. The Highway 1 Trail runs from Orchard Street to Mormon Trek Boulevard, where it connects with a side path that extends north to Coralville. A short on -street connection from the Highway 1 Trail links to tThe Willow Creek Trail, continues on through Kiwanis Park, Willow Creek Park, Walden Square shopping area, and on currently provides access to West High School, Walden Square commercial area, Willow Creek Park and Kiwanis Park, and the neighborhoods west of Sunset Street. Future plans include extending the Willow Creek Trail under Highway 218 to Hunters Run Park and the County Historic Poor Farm property, and eventually to Melrose Avenue. A side path is also provided along Rohret Road. To the south, the Willow Creek Trail is planned to pedestrians can cross under Highway 1 e-i-at a signalized intersection to -which connects to the commercial properties on the south side of Highway 1. Ultimately, the Willow Creek Trail is planned to generally follow Willow Crcck to thc Iowa Rivcr where it will connect to thc IRC Trail in thc vicinity of Napoleon Park. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 22 Bike lanes are provided on Mormon Trek Boulevard and Rohret Road. Iowa City's Bicycle Master Plan calls for bike lanes and/or sidepaths on the following Streets: Benton and Sunset Streets; west of University Heights on Melrose Avenue; and south of Highway 1 on Mormon Trek Boulevard. Wide sidewalks within arterial street corridors enhance the pedestrian/bicycle network and are used to help connect neighborhoods to the trail system. An important objective of the plan is to continue filling in the existing gaps in the sidewalk network in the district, as well as expanding connectivity throughout the pedestrian and bicycle network. As arterial streets in southwest Iowa City are reconstructed, it will be important to continue add - features such as wide sidewalks, bike lanes or wide travel lanes for bicyclists, and pedestrian -friendly bridges and underpasses. VVhiie many gains have been made since 2002 including trails and crossings along Highway 1, the City should continue to .prioritizes should be given to the following pedestrian facility improvements: • Fill in the gaps and improve the sidewalks along Riverside Drive; • Fill in the gaps and improve the sidewalk network along Benton Street; • Widen the sidewalks on one side of Benton Street where possible; • As the district continues to develop, evaluate the need for new or improved pedestrian crossings; • Construct wide sidewalks or trails along Highway 1 in order to create pedestrian/bicycle access to the Highway 1 commercial properties. • As -Provide pedestrian and bicycle routes that improve connectivity, especially in well -travelled areas such as near the University of Iowa campusfacilities are added to the Highway 1 corridor, pedestrian-srssings will need to be esta-bashed. for pedestrian -crossings exist at the signalized intersections. A pedestrian underpass of Highway 1 can potentially be constructed using a culvert originally built for overflow from Willow Creek. • Provide pedestrian facilities on the Highway 6 bridge across the Iowa River and at the intersection of Highway 1/Highway 6 and Riverside Drive. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 23 1 Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 24 PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES Fire Protection The Iowa City Fire Department provides fire protection to the Southwest District. Fire Station No. 2, located at 301 Emerald Street, provides primary response to the District. Secondary response is provided by Fire Station No. 1, located downtown at the Iowa City Civic Center. First response times for the developed properties in the District average between four and eight minutes. However, response times for properties located on the periphery of the Southwest District can exceed eight minutes. As the Southwest District continues to develop westward, it is likely that response times will increase. To help keep response times low, it may will be necessary to secure land to relocate develop a new Fire Station No. 2 farther southwest so that it is nearer to the geographic center of on the west side of the city. Arterial street continuity and secondary access are important to ensure adequate fire and emergency protection. A location on Rohret Roada primary street with good access to the area would be appropriate. Sanitary Sewer Service Sanitary sewer is essential for development within Iowa City. Without public sewer service, development is limited to one house per acre. In such situations a private septic system is required and is controlled by the Johnson County Health Department. Because it greatly increases the allowable intensity of development, the construction of a sewer line can have as much influence on development as zoning laws. Sanitary sewer service in the Southwest District is provided by a series of major interceptor/trunk sewer lines and the lateral sewer lines which feed into them. Interceptor and trunk sewers are large pipes that provide service to an entire drainage basin and are usually constructed by the City. The City has a standing policy of recouping the cost of trunkline construction by collecting "tap -on" fees from developments that later hook into the sewer. In the Southwest District, the primary sewers are the Westside Trunk, Willow Creek Interceptor, and Southwest Trunk. Lateral sewer lines are smaller sewers that feed into trunk and interceptor sewers. Individual houses and buildings have service lines that hook into the lateral sewer lines. All of the city's sewer lines flow to one of the City's two -wastewater treatment plants, TheNorth Wastewater Treatment Plant is located adjacent to the Iowa River north of located to the north of Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 25 Napoleon Street on the far south side of the city. Thiese#plant treat_ raw sewage according to Federal and State requirements so that the treated wastewater can be released into the Iowa River. All of the existing developments in the Southwest District are adequately served by the existing sanitary sewer system. There are properties in thc southern portion of the Country Club Estates area Rohret Road and west of Highway 218 that cannot be further developed until the Abbey Lane Trunk Sewer is extended to the west side of Highway 218or a lift station is built to pump sewage to the VVestside Trunk. Until theise- improvements axis made, there will be no further expansion in this part of the subdivicioncity. Development in the area west of Slothower Road can utilize the landfill lift station to pump sewage to the Westside Trunk as a temporary measure until additional trunk lines, a lift station and the Abbey Lane Trunk sewer are constructed to serve the larger growth area south of Rohret Road. The provision of sewer service to the area south of Rohret Road and west of Highway 218 will require the Abbey Lane Trunk Sewer to be extended under Highway 218 and, for the far westerly portions of the growth area, the construction of a lift station. The Abbey Lane Trunk Sewer is scheduled to be extended in 2023.D+e to the high cost of this project, it is not likely to occur in the near future. As the other ar ac of thc Southwcst District bccome more fully developed, the cost of this sewer project may be justified to open additional land for urban growth. Until that time, agricultural uses will continue to predominate in this area. Water Service As development occurs, water lines are extended from adjacent subdivisions to serve areas of new growth. Individual developers are responsible for installing water mains within their subdivisions. Developers are also charged a water main extension fee that is applied to their share of the cost of building the city-wide distribution system. The City installed water main along Slothower Road from Melrose Avenue to the water main in the Country Club Estates Additions. The water main in the Country Club Estates Additions extends to the water main in Rohret Road and creates a looped system that rcccntly constructcd a watcr storagc tank in thc Slothowcr Road vicinity to improves the resilience of the water supply system pressure on the far west side of the city. For the same reason, it will be necessary in the near fut to loop the existing dead end mains along Highway 1 and located along Rohret Road-- - Melrose Avenue. Solid Waste The Iowa City Landfill and Recycling Center abuts the western boundary of the Southwest District and is directly west of the proposed future alignment of Highway 965. The landfill has been in use since 1972, serving all of Johnson County and the communities of Riverside and Kalona in Washington County. The landfill has an estimated site life of_,- 30 --=-years. The current cell 200 acrc sitc has about Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 26 1300 out of 411 acres buried in refuse mainly on the eastern portion of the property. These 100 acres have Much of this area has been capped and grass has been planted to stabilize the banks. The landfill owns two additional 110-acre properties to on the west of the site and plane arc to continue purchasing land surrounding the landfill to the west, north and south in order to add capacity and to created a buffer between the landfill and any future developmentsurrounding properties. Portions of the buffer area could be used for recreation and the landfill itself could be used for recreational purposes in the distant future. Besides landfilling operations, the City manages multiple recycling programs and a commercial compost facility at this site. Southwest District Plan 11/07/2210/08/02 27 SOUTHWEST DISTRICT SUBAREAS The following sections above. The goals an and illustrated on indicate the type addition, futur using dashe and wide Willow Creek Subarea Raft South DI Bi ■ sevelt Subaces 1I the plan refer to the four subareas ill trated on the map bjectives for each of these areas are higt.'ighted in the text onceptual plan maps. These plan maps are c ,Ior-coded to f land use or types of development intended for si ecific areas. In ad extensions and possible new street configurations are illustrated nes. The red lines on the plan maps indicate existing and :"..Iture trails walks. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 28 SOUTHWEST DISTRICT SUBAREAS • ■ • 1 a 7 +�1 � lit r tibare i ic- +1 iIIu ('re k SuIh area 711 q-R ■ � *t a � r • � giro Hoe' di SuI)a1rat • w 1 ■ r . ■ 1 • Oa • ■ . a l The following sections of the plan refer to the four subareas illustrated on the map above. The goals and objectives for each of these areas are highlighted in the text and illustrated on conceptual plan maps. These plan maps are color -coded to indicate the types of land use or types of development intended for specific areas. In addition, future road extensions and possible new street configurations are illustrated using dashed lines. The red lines on the plan maps indicate existing and future trails and wide sidewalks. Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211/07/22 24 ROHRET SOUTH SUBAREA The Rohret South Subarea extends west from Highway 218 and south from Rohret Road to the City's growth area limit. The vast majority Most of the land in this subarea is currently outside Iowa City's corporate limits and is used primarily for agriculture. The non -farm uses in the area can be characterized as large -lot semi - rural homes. Thcce homes are located primarily along the south side of Rohret Road, along Kitty Lee Road, amain the Rohret Court and Kessler Road area, and in scattered locations. Topographically, the astern portion much of the subarea consists of rolling hills with some flatter areas along the hills' crests. The ILand in the northeast portion of the subarea generally drains into the cast and there are Middle Branch Willow Creek which flows east through two primary, semi -wooded drainageways leading to a low area directly west of Highway 218. As -In the southeast portion of the subarea, the watershed drains south. West of Maier Avenue, water sheds west and then south to Old Man's Creek. The topography provides scenic vistas for the area but also creates infrastructure challengesaand stretches to the western limite of City's growth area, the hills and drainagcways are Ie:c pronounced. Public Services and Facilities In order tTo develop at urban densities, city services such as sewer and water will have to be extended to the Rohret South Subarea. Once The Abbey Lane trunk sewer project in 2023 will is -extend sewer servicesed west of Highway 218, which will make the northeast portion of this subarea will become suitable for urban development. It is, therefore, important to plan now for the future orderly growth of this part of the Southwest District. Once the northeast portion of the subarea develops, sewer will need to be extended west to the Old Man's Creek watershed via Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211 /07/22 51 a pressurized sewer main and lift station, according to the 2011 Sewer System Master Plan. To the southeast, sewer can be provided by a pressurized sewer main and lift station south of Highway 1. Both proposed lift stations to the west and south are planned, but not expected to be constructed in the near future. Several of the most significant topographical characteristics of this area are the relic+inn+ rdrainageway€ and the low hying area near Highway 21 8 nn land 4hat is pr perty t dctcrminc its suitability f r a futurc rcgi nal st rmwatcr managcmcnt facility.4 Storm water management is also required in Iowa City to offset the detrimental effects of urbanization on downstream land use. The report states that it is feasible to construct a In this subarea, stormwater should be managed at the regional storm water control facility upstream of Highway 218 on the Carson property. Such a r gional facility would provid caf and ffici nt control of drainag from tho undcvcl pcd watcrshcd and rcducti n ffl d risk and damagc in the d wnstrcam, allowlevel with fewer, larger detention basins, which would reduce the number of smaller basins needed. This creates several benefits, including provide more efficient use of land resources, lower total maintenance costs, and allow for additional multipurpose uses. For example, the future land use map shows a regional stormwater detention lake in the northeast portion of the subarea which could accommodate recreational uses such as water activities, Amenities such as trails, and other recreation facilities could be developed around the new lake amenities thata serve surrounding residential neighborhoods. It is based on a study In 1996, the City conducted a study of this property to determine which identified this area may be its-suitableil+ty- for a future regional stormwater management facility.2 In addition to recreational uses gsuch a regional facility would provide safe and efficient control ofdrainage from the undeveloped watershed and would reduceti-a4a# flood risk and damage in the downstream, developed areas. Additional stud is required for the southeast and west portions of the subarea to evaluate future regional stormwater management options. Form -Based Land Use The future land use map on p. 59 illustrates the potential future uses of property within the Rohret South subarea. It utilizes form -based land use categories to demonstrate characteristics desired in this subarea, including neighborhood centers, a mix of housing types, public parks, pedestrian routes between amenities, an interconnected street network, and adequate public services. There is some flexibility in interpreting and applying the future land use vision to this subarea depending on engineering constraints, environmental factors, and the preferences of individual property owners. However, any development must be consistent with this vision and City regulations. Iowa. City of Iowa City, Iowa Public Works Dcpartmcnt, Octobcr, 1996. 2 Preliminary Design Report for Carson's Lake, Regional Storm Water Management Plan for Iowa City, Iowa. City of Iowa City, Iowa Public Works Department, October, 1996. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 52 Form -based land use represents a paradigm shift from more conventional use -based maps. Traditional land use maps are organized into four major categories: residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional. In other words, they identify areas for houses, for stores and offices, for factories, and for schools and civic buildings respectively. However, this future land use map utilizes form -based categories to determine what may be built where. This means that it focuses on how the built environmental may look and function first, and then the land use secondly. As a result, it reflects the intended physical character of places, such as describin_g_a "main street" area rather than a "commercial" or "mixed use" area. In addition, form -based land uses incorporate other elements of the built environment to create vibrant walkable urbanism, including the interaction of uses, civic spaces, thoroughfares, frontages, and building types. Iowa City's form -based land use categories are organized by the Natural -to -Urban Transect framework. Transects' are a hierarchy of physical environments ranging from the natural environment (Transect 1 or T1) to the urban core (Transect 6 or T6). The designation of each transect along this hierarchy is determined first by the type of place and intensity of development, and secondly by the mix of uses. This hierarchy replaces traditional use categories as the organizing principle for most of this subarea. Because the subarea is on the edge of Iowa City, it includes only designations from the T3 Suburban and T4 General Urban transects. RURAL I I I I 1 I I I I I TRANSECT I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I URBAN 'NATURAL TRANSECTZONES I URBAN TRANSECT ZONES DISTRICTS V jp, I ...i, --„,- --_ = , I = T ,„_- . : ,- ,,---, ... tkr kt•4 r ■ +�`}� I. TI NATURAL T2 RURAL CIt. _.. _4 NNE 1101 MOM ...,' 11MPP 'WI T3 SUB -URBAN T4 GENERAL URBAN T5 URBAN CENTER _ TB URBAN CORE D DISTRICT Any future annexations, rezoninqs, and subdivisions must be consistent with the vision in this Plan. In 2021, the City developed form -based zones for greenfield sites at Article 14-2H Form -Based Zones and Standards. The Article has zoning districts and regulations that are generally consistent with this Plan and may be used to help in the implementation of its vision. New Neighborhoods Given the current pattern of existing development and infrastructure constraints in the Southwest District, it is likely that new neighborhoods development in the Rohret South Subarea will begin developing first in the vicinity ofnear the intersection of Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 53 Rohret Road and Highway 218. This area is w-closer proximity to existing services than areas further west or south and development is expected to continue following the Abbey Lane trunk sewer as it extends west. As noted above, this area has may beep identified as suitable for a regional stormwater detention facility. This facility and along with +t-s-associated amenities which would further encourage new development in the northeast portion remainder of the Rohret South Subarea. The attached Ca�arson aka Concept Plan future land use map illustrates how a regional stormwater facility can be integrated into the design of a new neighborhood. The following elements should be included to maximize the benefit of this public facility to all area residents and visitors to this part of the City: • A park should be created around the entire lake with appropriate recreational facilities to allow for easy public access, views. and recreational enjoyment. Amenities may include areas for a playground, picnic tables, and restrooms. 6—A public street and bicycle/pedestrian trail ring the entire lake. The street ws#ould define the edge of the park. around at least the northern half of the lake. • Appropriate recreational facilities should be located within the park. • Public street and pedestrian while the trail access to the park should also be located on the south side of the lake. • A bicycle/pedestrian trail should ring the entire lake run through the park and tie into the broader trail system that extends which connects to other city neighborhoods. • If a regional stormwater facility is constructed, it may be pos€ible to use the existing culvert that runs under Highway 218 as a tunnel for a pedestrian trail connection to the neighborhoods on the east side of the highway. A regional stormwater facility could provide a focal point for new neighborhoods • Areas for a playground, picnic table and restrooms should be provided within the park. Parking for these recreational facilities should be located on the public street or in smaller parking lotc for 10 15 car&Other civic uses such as an indoor recreation center and/or elementary school should be located near the future park to provide mutual benefit to all uses involved. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 54 Given the drainage issues in this area, if a stormwater lake is not constructed, a public park with a smaller water feature and public amenities, including trails, picnic tables, playground and restrooms, should may be considered in lieu of the lake. The recommended concepts for development around the lake design considerations above shwould also apply to the park if it does not include a lake. Regardless, a regional park of some sort is needed in the Southwest Planning District. This Plan also shows neighborhood centers spread throughout the subarea, along with an interconnected street and pedestrian network. Neighborhood centers serve as a focal point for nearby residents and can include a mix of commercial, residential, and institutional uses, such as schools, parks, fire stations, or other civic buildings. Interconnected streets and pedestrian routes diffuse traffic and make it easier to get around the area using multiple modes of transportation. These centers help to promote walkability and address the needs of those living nearby. Care must be given to the design of new neighborhoods to preserve the natural features of the area including woodland areas, streams, potential wetlands, and steep slopes. and minimize the need for extensive grading. The City's Sensitive Areas Map chows a significant woodland zone in the subarea. The impact of development on these and other wooded areas features should be minimized in compliance with the City's Sensitive Area's Ordinance and significant trees preserved. It would may be appropriate to use the semi -wooded ravines for trail corridors and open space which . These tra-ils could also provide connections between future neighborhood parks in the Rohret South Subarea and to other neighborhoods in the Southwest District. In addition, other public parks and private open space areas may be appropriate for recreational use of nearby residents and for stormwater management as the area continues to develop. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 55 Housing It is likely that a majority much of the housing developed in the Rohret South Subarea will be' density, single-family homes due to market forces. However, a variety of housing types and styles should be provided for persons of various incomes and family types, including singles, couples, families and retired persons. In addition, development should be compact and orderly to help preserve agricultural uses until such property is developed and to help ensure the efficient provision of public services. As illustrated in the concept plan on the following pagefuture land use map, much of the subarea is proposed to be Transect 3: Suburban (T3). Neighborhood Edge areas - which allow single-family, duplex, and cottage court building types - are located near existing, large lot development. Much of the remainder of the subarea is designated Neighborhood General, which also allows townhouse and small-scale multi -family uses. All T3 development requires a mix of building types, though it must be at a scale that is consistent with typical single-family homes. Other areas are designated Transect 4: General Urban (T4), which allows denser building adjacent to neighborhood centers and major thoroughfares. Neighborhood Small areas provide a transition from T3 areas by allowing house -scale multi -family and cottage court building types. Neighborhood Medium and Main Street areas comprise the core of neighborhood centers and located are along major thoroughfares, especially where a street only has buildings on one side and open space on the other (called "single -loaded" streets). These areas allow block -scale multi -family buildings up to 3.5 stories, which the area north of the proposed lake and south of Rohret Road le moct appropriate for a mix of medium to high density cinglc family housing, including condominiums and townhouses, and for low density multifamily housing. Allowing greater housing densities in specific areas around the lake will provide a greater number of residents easy increases access to this significant public amenities and supports y. In addition, thc higher density housing to a neighborhood commercial areauses. Main Street areas are also identified near Highway 218 as a noise buffer for residential areas.Civcn thc character of the topography, lower density single family homes may be more appropriate on the south tide of the lake. When sewer service is extended under Highway 218 it will be possible for some of the existing large lot residential properties to connect into the City sewer system upon annexation. When these properties have better access to City services, the existing large lots could be further subdivided in accordance with T3 Neighborhood Edge standards if property owners decide to do so. Southwest District Plan 10/08/0211/07/22 55 Neighborhood CentersCommercial Development A new commercial Neighborhood centers with a mix of commercial residential, and institutional uses are ideally located throughout the subarea to provide a focal point for nearby residents. Areas designated as "open" would allow but not require a wider variety of uses, including small-scale commercial uses that are compatible with adjacent properties. Storefronts close to the sidewalk invite pedestrians Areas shown as T4 Main Street are intended for commercial uses on the ground floor. These should be constructed as a more traditional to cerve the Surrounding neighborhoods would be appropriately located along the entry corridor to the neighborhood, located on the south side of Rohret Road (as illustrated on the concept plan). This new commercial area should be developed using a "main street" model area with in which buildings a-e constructed at the front lot line and parking is -provided on the street or, Additional parking could be located ir, areas• behind the buildings. IdeallyThe commercial buildings should be at least two stories high in order to give definition to the street with residential or office uses located above where appropriate-siaa-ce. Attention should be given to pPublic amenities such as benches, garbage receptacles, a bus stop, and bicycle parking .In all cases neighborhood centers are shown on the future land use map surrounded by T4 areas to help support Because the viability of commercial development which depends in part on the residential density of the immediate area rtme;ts o es oulld-be encouraged in the upper levels of the commercial buildings. Furthermore, low dcnsity, multifamily housing would be appropriatc in arcs adjaccnt to the "main street" commercial area. The City's Neighborhood Commercial (CN 1) zoning designation would facilitate the type of commercial development described and illustrated in the plan. Civic and institutional uses can also be an important component of neighborhood centers, which may include places of worship, facilitics such as a church, a fire station or a recreational center would also be appropriate adjacent to or integrated into the commercial area and could be used to provide a buffer between Highway 218 and the new neighborhood. Additional civic facilities could also be located across Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 56 from Weber Elementary on Rohret Road. If a fire station is sited at a prominent location adjacent to a neighborhood commercial area, the City has the opportunity to ectablich a nocitiye and infli ential a ence pro �h c i d� n e innl6cion of cuch cimnlo public amenitiec ac a clock tower. The future land use map shows a recreation center and elementary school near the proposed regional stormwater lake and park. Another civic center is located on the future alignment of Slothower Street/Landon Avenue which proposes space for a park, fire station, an elementary school, and possibly a junior high school. While a fire station is needed in this subarea, it may also be developed sooner in another neighborhood centers if the neighborhood grows quickly. Similarly, an emergency siren will be needed for this area as it continues to develop west and south. Transportation The thoroughfare map is a component of the future land use map included on p. 60. It shows a potential hierarchy of streets that support the goals of this Plan, including a well-connected street network with multiple routes to destinations, pedestrian connections between neighborhood centers and parks, and smaller block sizes and thoroughfare types that support the form -based land use categories. It also includes streets that directly abut major parks and the lakefront to help ensure a highly visible and substantive means of public access and high -quality of public spaces and view corridors. The majority Most of the arterial major street framework in this subarea is established between Rohret Road, Highway 1, and Highway 218. The only new major arterial street planned for is the extension of Highway 965 e-n-through the west side of the subarea, which will provide an additional north -south Zink for arterial high volumes of traffic. As land is annexed to the City and +s-developed in the Rohret South Subarea, improvements to the existing arterial major street system will likely be needed. For example, a-c residential development continues west along Rohret Road must continue to be improved to City standards, the urban crow section of Rohrct Road, including pavement, storm sewers, and sidewalks, will be continued to the west. As traffic patterns develop, turning lanes may be needed at key intersections such as Rohret Road / Mormon Trek Boulevard and Rohret Road / Maier Avenue. A collector street should provide a connection between the proposed stormwater lake and Highway 1. A diagonal orientation this the topography of the area would be appropriate. Other important throughstreets in the Rohret South Subarea will must include a -new north -south collector street west of Highway 218 and east -west connections to serve the future neighborhood centers and planned commercial» institutional. uees and recreational areasuses around the proposed stormwater lake. Maier Avenue is an existing north -south Zink between Rohret Road and Highway 1 that -and will continue to be a-n-important link to allow residents of this area in facilitating access to both between Highway 1 and Rohret Road. As land eventually develops to urban densities in this area and Maier Avenue is paved, it will be subject Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 57 to additional traffic pressure. To keep traffic moving at appropriate speeds for a residential area while allowing for traffic circulation between Rohret Road and Highway 1, the future land use map proposes realigning Maier with Wild Prairie Drive to the north and incorporating a neighborhood square, off-cet intersection, or and median improvements should be designed into Maier Avenue. These physical changes to the roadway should emphasizehelp controlling the speed of traffic, while still allowing for circulation between Rohret Road and Highway 1. Additional north - south collector streets along the Slothower Street / Landon Avenue alignment to the west and parallel to Highway 218 to the east will further help distribute traffic which will reduce impacts on all through -streets. East -west connections are shown throughout the subarea for the same reason. In all cases, attention must be paid to street design to ensure appropriate speeds. For local streets, traditional neighborhood design with an integrated system of narrow streets and alleyc, sidewalks, trails, and street trees should be the model for many of the new Rohret South neighborhoods. The traditional grid street pattern will discourage high traffic speeds and disperse traffic. VVhereR urban residential densities are proposed, alleys in the rear may be used to relocate will allow utilities t$ be located in the rear, thereby allowing more space for the planting of right of way trees along residential streets. Alleys also and reduce the impact of driveways and garages on the streetscape, which de-emphasizes the automobile and creates a more people -friendly neighborhood. However, direct property access from Rohret Road, Highway 1, and the future Highway 965 should not be allowed, so alleys or an alternative point of access will likely be necessary. The use of architectural features such as front porches and other frontage types further contributes to this goal. In addition, pedestrian connections should be provided to promote walkability and linkages between neighborhood centers, school sites, parks, and within longer blocks. Because of the rolling hills and drainageways in -throughout the vicinity of the ctormwatcr lakcsubarea, an integrated street grid may need to be somewhat modified to respond to the topography, though connectivity must continue to be prioritized in this area. Where Aa-lleys should be encouraged, but where they are not feasible, the impact of driveways and garages should be minimized to the extent possible, such as by locating garages behind or to the side of the front facade of the house or by utilizing shared driveways. Where the topograp-h-¢+s flatter, the curvilinear strccts around the lakc should transition to possible, a more traditional grid system should be utilized to maximize connectivity, which makes an area easier to navigate, disperses traffic, reduces traffic spaces, and encourages walkability. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 58 The snuthbound street from Rnhret Road to the lake park will be the entry corridor to Trrc�v c cn the lake neighborhood, therefore buildings along this street should be well designed and built using high quality materials. These structures should be architecturally designed to reflect a distinctive character for this new neighborhood. Because the could be designed using a grid system. Care should be given to ensure the accessibility to and quality of public spaces and view corridors. With any new subdivision request, ilt will be important to ensure that a highly visible and substantive means of public access to the lake is provided such as using-Ssingle-loaded streets along the lakefront are strongly encouraged. Because of the rolling hills in this area, care should also be given to the design of the buildings that can be seen from across the lake or other public spaces. A ncw c mmcrcial ccntcr t scrvc thc surr unding neighb rh ds w uld be appropriatoly Iocatod along th ntry c rrid r t thc ncighb rh d, I catcd n thc s uth side f R hrct R ad (as illuctratod on tho concopt plan). This ncw c mmcrcial arca sh ul bc devel ped using a "main strcct" m dcl In which buildings ar construct d at thc fr nt I t line and parking is pr vidcd n the street. A iti nal parking c ul bo Iocatod in aroac bohind tho buildingc. Tho commorcial buildingc chould bo at Icast tw st rics high in rdcr t give dcfiniti n t thc strcct spacc. Public amcnitics such as benches, garbage receptacles, a bus st p, and bicycle parking sh uld be providod. Bocauco tho viability of c mmcrcial dcvcl pmcnt dcpcnds in part Storefronts close to the sidewalk invite pedestrians Immodiato aroa, apartmontc or officoc Gh ul bc cnc uragcd in thc upper levels h using w uld bc appr priatc in arcs iroa. Tho City'c Noighborhood C mmcrcial (CN 1) z ning dcsignati n dov lopmont doccribod and illuctratod in thc plan. Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 59 Civic facilities such as a church, fire stati n, r recrcati nal center w uld als bc appropriato adjacont to or intogratod into tho commorcial ar a and could b ueod to pr vide a buffer bctwccn Highway 218 and thc new ncighb rh d. Additi nal civic facilities c uld als bc I catcd acr ss fr m Wcbcr Elementary n R hrct R ad. If a firo ctation is citod at a prominont location adjacont to a noighborhood commorcial area, thc City has thc pp rtunity t establish a p sitivc and influential civic presence thr ugh quality design and the inclusi n f such simple public amenities as a cl ck temoe r. €fie -Timing of Development West of 11Aaier venue The far western portion of Development in the Rohret South Subarea is not likely to develop in the short term due to the lack of will largely depend on the provision of public services and facilitiesthe demand for new housing. This areas designated "future urban development" on the plan map on the following page. While a small area near the intersection of Highway 218 and Highway 1 could develop currently, much of the rest is dependent on the expansion of the sanitary sewer system, watersheds boundaries, and development interest. Prior to development, land must be serviceable by City infrastructure and must be annexed, zoned, and subdivided. In general, dDevelopment should not proceed into this area until occur in a compact manner with properties adjacent to existing urban development abuilt out first. When development at urban densities becomes -possible and appropriate more detailed plans should be developed for this area. Goals for the Rohret South Subarea • Encourage housing diversity in new neighborhoods. • Preserve natural features and topography. • Build streets that enhance neighborhood quality. • Encourage commercial development that serves local residents. • Reserve space for neighborhood parks and trails that connect to other areas of the City. • Provide adequate street and pedestrian access to recreational facilities and other public amenities. Establish a public focal point for new neighborhoods, such as a lake or park. • Southwest District Plan 11 /07/2210/08/02 60 , ApZ.44.4g.4,I„4i1 4i,tgt4,1.ik,;.0.,...n1..1..1,.seePP.ammi -NERI1 ,,4 rfr :4.7=,-.4:m=.1.,1.t=,„,,'...4.=_.--..rl li� —Iltii 'r .11 :, m, on ww i t% lir #4144 l Alin 'pi * OIL �� ti4 -22pri,tip 4— al • Ala. 00,11 wmpir,ii. was, ill 0414111111 LA /i��w1_a�u��i� .1. rl ;` '1.WAil-3`1110Pt_ isvoize 1011911.1 :171114.47r1 mom 111, 7 lui it.: aN 411IIIU IIIIII ¢3EAia�4�4 peob aamoypois SOUTHWEST PLANNING DISTRICT Rohret South Subarea October 2022 a •* r 1' . • ®I Lull �s 4r L$%• 1. { •i _peon ea7 Au!N 6.II ° , `e . ,I W1 rr MOUS ■_mil ■ r Ift 1 ■■ Dv • r i :.‚( IFA1W �I • ■1 ■■ Mk I nu in NEI ms • Ed ill 11 11 1;licommEsimmaimmi k IN El IIII w sus am id gr peob 4amo4no1S 4" ..i4V i MS anueny 'any MI NM MES=M101 INOUE IM■O 11111M11111111 • U;w MO cm H U H N Z Z m Z J z R N cC N O =+r�o H L O _a o ccoccHO Appendix A Southwest District Plan Map Designations Large Lot/Rural Residential Suitable for large lot single family development in areas not suited for more intensive development due to natural limitations, i.e. soil, slope, unavailability ofsewer and water utilities. Development Density: approximately 1 dwelling unit/acre Single-Family/Duplex Residential Intended primarily for single family and duplex residential development. Lower density zoning designations are suitable for areas with sensitive environmental features, topographical constraints, or limited street access. Higher densities are more appropriate for areas with good access to all city services and facilities. Development Density: 2-12 dwelling units/acre Narrow Lot/Townhouse Residential Suitable for medium to high density single family residential development, including zero lot line development, duplexes, townhouses, and narrow lot detached single family housing. Development Density: 6-12 dwelling units/acre Low -Density Multi -Family Residential Intended for low -density multi -family housing. Suitable for areas with good access to all city services and facilities. Higher density zoning designations may not be suitable for areas with topographical constraints or limited street access. Development Density: 8 -15 dwelling units/acre Medium- to High -Density Multi -Family Residential Intended for medium- to high -density multi -family housing. Suitable for areas with good access to all city services and facilities. Higher density zoning designations may not be suitable for areas with topographical constraints or limited street access. Development Density: 16-44 dwelling units/acre Future Urban Development Areas within the growth limit that are not yet served by City services and may not experience substantial development within the lifetime of this district plan. As development becomes imminent in these areas, the City will develop more detailed land use and street layout concepts to supplement the current plan. Public/Private Open Space Indicates existing open space that is important for the protection of sensitive natural features and/or to provide for recreational opportunities and protect the aesthetic values of the community. An open space designation on private land may indicate that an area is largely unsuitable for development due to environmental or topographical constraints. While these areas are best reserved or acquired for private or public open space, development may occur on privately held land if a proposal meets the underlying zoning requirements and the requirements of the Iowa City Sensitive Areas Ordinance. Vegetative Noise and Sight Buffer Useful public facilities, such as limited -access highways or landfills, can produce undesirable side -effects. In these areas a substantial vegetative buffer should be maintained or established to separate residential development from these uses. Alternatively, where appropriate, nonresidential uses can be used to buffer residential areas from highways, landfills, and other such uses. Public Services/Institutional Areas intended for civic, cultural, or historical institutions; public schools; and places of assembly or worship. Iowa City does not have a zone that designates institutional uses as the primary, preferred land use. However, there are a number of zones where these uses are permitted or provisional uses. Development proposals are subject to the requirements of the underlying zoning designation. Land that is owned by a public entity is typically zoned Public (P). Neighborhood Commercial Areas intended for retail sales and personal service uses that meet the day-to-day needs of a fully developed residential neighborhood. A grocery store or grocery store/drug store combination is preferred as the primary tenant in a Neighborhood Commercial (CN-1) zone. Specific site development standards will apply in these areas to ensure that commercial development is pedestrian -friendly and compatible with surrounding residential development. Office Commercial Areas intended for office uses and compatible businesses. In some cases these areas may serve as a buffer between residential areas and more intensive commercial or industrial uses. General Commercial Areas intended to provide the opportunity for a large variety of commercial uses that serve a major segment of the community. Mixed Use Areas intended for development that combines commercial and residential uses. An area may be primarily commercial in nature or may be primarily residential depending on the location and the surrounding neighborhood. Commercial uses will typically be located on the ground floor with housing above. Development is intended to be pedestrian - oriented with buildings close to and oriented to the sidewalk. Appendix A Southwest District Plan Map Designations Intensive Commercial Areas intended for those sales and service functions and businesses whose operations are typically characterized by outdoor display and storage of merchandise, by repair businesses, quasi -industrial uses, and for sales of large equipment or motor vehicles, or by activities or operations conducted in buildings or structure not completely enclosed. Retail uses are restricted in order to provide opportunities for more land -intensive or quasi - industrial commercial operations and also to prevent conflicts between retail and industrial truck traffic. Special attention must be directed toward buffering the negative aspects of allowed uses from any adjacent lower intensity commercial areas or residential areas. FORM -BASED LAND USE CATEGORIES TRANSECT 3: SUBURBAN Neighborhood Edge A walkable neighborhood environment of detached, low - intensity housing choices, supporting and within short walking distance of neighborhood -serving retail, food and service uses. Building types are house -scale with a small -to -large building footprint, which may include single-family homes, duplexes, and cottage courts. Building height should typically be up to 2.5 stories. Neighborhood General A walkable neighborhood environment of detached, low - intensity housing choices, supporting and within short walking distance of neighborhood -serving retail and services. Building types are house -scale with a small building footprint, which may include single-family homes, duplexes, cottage courts, townhouses, and small multiplexes. Building height should typically be uo to 2.5 stories. TRANSECT4: GENERAL URBAN Neighborhood Small: A walkable neighborhood environment of attached and detached, moderate -intensity housing choices, supporting and within short walking distance of neighborhood -serving retail and services. Building types are primarily house -scale with a small -to -medium -footprint, which may include cottage courts, townhouses, small multiplexes, and larger multi -family buildings with courtyards. Building height should typically be up to 2.5 stories. Neighborhood Medium A walkable neighborhood environment of attached and detached, moderate -intensity housing choices, supporting and within short walking distance of neighborhood -serving retail and services. Building types are primarily house -scale with a small -to -medium -footprint, which may include townhouses and larger multi -family buildings. Building height should typically be up to 3.5 stories. Main Street A walkable, vibrant district of attached, moderate -intensity mixed -use buildings, supporting neighborhood -serving ground floor retail, food and services, including indoor and outdoor artisanal industrial businesses. Building types are block -scale with a medium -to -large -footprint, which may include townhouses (and stacked townhouses), large multi- family buildings, and main street buildings. Building height should typically be up to 3.5 stories. OTHER DESIGNATIONS Open Subareas: Open subarea desiq_nations may be applied to T3 Neighborhood General, T4 Neighborhood Small, or T4 Neighborhood Medium land use designations. The subarea indicates that a wider range of uses should be allowed. However, buildings must maintain the same form and character of the base land use category. As such, open subareas provide additional flexibility that can allow them to function as a neighborhood center of non-residential uses. Public or Private Civic/Park/Open Space Indicates existing or potential civic or open spaces on public or private land that is important for a variety of reasons, which may include the protection of sensitive natural features, the management of stormwater, the provision of private, shared passive or recreational opportunities for a jacentproperties, or the protection of the aesthetic values of the community. This designation may indicate that an area is unsuitable for development due to environmental or topographical constraints. Development may occur if a proposal meets the under- lying zoning and subdivision standards.- NEW Attachment 2 Kirk Lehmann From: Sent: To: Subject: Jill Tentinger <jill.tentinger@gmail.com> Monday, November 28, 2022 10:29 AM Kirk Lehmann More Thoughts on SW Development ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Hello Kirk, We, as a neighborhood, plan to attend the new hearing on December 7th. Here are my revised thoughts on the SW Development Plan. Development is inevitable and it will be a years -long process. We, the residents of Kitty Lee Road, ask that our road not be used for temporary access to any construction or new developments. And we ask that we are not connected to any new developments or streets. We bought our homes in this neighborhood because of the quiet street and small neighborhood. And we would appreciate it staying that way. PLEASE do not add a connection to the north. And PLEASE do not add five feeder streets to Kitty Lee Road. i swrryr MN Jill Tentinger 319.631.5152 jill.tentingert gmail.com 4047 Kitty Lee Road SW flE tof r 49 -cZJC 2 NEW Kirk Lehmann From: mary ott <mary_ott@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 8:11 PM To: Kirk Lehmann Subject: Southwest District Plan ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** My name is Mary Ott. I live on Kitty Lee Rd. My husband and I moved into our home in 1970. We therefore have some experience in living on the road. Kitty Lee Road is a typical, rural county road. It is narrow, there are no shoulders, no curbs, no gutters, no storm water drainage system other than gravity. The first few years that we lived here, the road was gravel. It is now chip -sealed surfaced. It is not a hard surfaced road. I do not know when the road was first constructed but it was back when the road crews did not cut down hills during construction like they do now. Consequently, there are 2 hills on Kitty Lee which are steep enough to be called blind hills, meaning drivers cannot see what's ahead of them on the road until they crest the top of the hill. Unfortunately, many of us living on Kitty Lee have hidden driveways on the sides of the hills. We cannot see what's coming at us as we pull out onto the road. For the first 15 or so years that we lived in our home, the road was a through road commonly called The Coralville Cutoff Road. The combination of blind hills, hidden driveways and lots of through traffic made Kitty Lee a very dangerous road. In the early 80's, a neighbor's child was hit and killed on the road immediately in front of our house as he rode his bike. The driver who hit him could not see him until it was too late to avoid hitting him. The little boy never saw the car coming. When you see something like this happen in your front yard, you never forget it. There were many, many accidents on the road, mostly because drivers cannot see what's ahead of them until they've crested the hill. More than once, the road resembled a demolition derby field. All it took was one car getting sideways on the road, then the chain reaction chaos would begin with cars cresting the hill, seeing the sideways car, hitting the brakes, losing control and sliding into the car, the ditch or someone's mailbox. I would be safe in saying that the majority of home football game Saturday nights ended up with someone wiping out a mailbox [usually ours] as they headed for the ditch. When Kitty Lee Road [AKA The Coralville Cutoff Road] was a through road, it was very dangerous. In the mid 80's, the Coralville Cutoff Road was dead ended at the top of the north hill due to the construction of the new HWY 218. This was a major inconvenience for me because I always went north on my way to work or to the grocery store but I was very thankful that now I could safely pull out onto the road without getting hit. There has not been an accident on Kitty Lee Road for the past 35 years! Now the plan is to open the road to through traffic again. I truly dread that happening. The hills and hidden driveways are still here! I get the feeling that the planners do not realize just how dangerous the road is with through traffic. Is it really necessary to open Kitty Lee to through traffic? I think not! I see a lot of new roads on the plans so I assume the developers will have lots of road building equipment out here. Let them go over to the west a bit and build a nice, new, flat, hard surfaced road over there. Let the developers pay for the new, safe road. They are the ones who will be benefitting from it. The only way to make Kitty Lee safe is to do a massive regrading, cutting down the hills. This would require redoing the driveway entrances also. Who is going to pay for all of this? I don't think it's right to make the residents pay for something they don't want. Is Iowa City able to pay i for making Kitty Lee safe? I don't know. I think the sensible thing to do is make the developers pay for a new, safe road to the west and let Kitty Lee Road alone. If the planners are set on opening Kitty Lee to through traffic, I would like to request that a highway safety expert come out and evaluate the suitability of opening Kitty Lee to through traffic. I would love to know what an expert thinks is necessary to do to make living on Kitty Lee safe! I would also like to know if Iowa City would be liable for damages, injuries or even deaths if they insist on opening Kitty Lee to through traffic after being informed of the dangers of the road? Mary Ott 2 NEW Kirk Lehmann From: amy.charles <amy.charles@protonmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 2:04 AM To: Kirk Lehmann Subject: RE: Draft Southwest District Plan Update Available Online ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Hi, Kirk - I'd meant to do a more comprehensive review, but this will have to do for now. I sent this to John Thomas a week or so ago: I live on Shannon Drive, cattycorner to where the new Southwest District plan will guide development. I've been looking at the plans that've been sent out, and I was taken aback by how SFH/car-centric it is. It looks very 1990s to me, with the addition of some islands of higher -density housing with strips of storefront, long stretches with no clear destinations to walk to, kids reliant on parents to drive them around, and a layout that doesn't even encourage bicycling to the school the plan calls for in the district -- we're just setting up for another twice -daily idling minivan brigade. I can also see things turning extremely busy -- and fast -- along Shannon unless West and the City encourage other means of getting the kids back and forth to school that's actually palatable to the kids, or West and the City restrict parking. I think we have opportunity to do better with the planning for non -private -car -centric neighborhoods here, and wonder if you'd have time to talk sometime next week. Incidentally, I was looking at old plans for my neighborhood, and the emphasis on Walden Square as a walkable destination so that people would use cars less. It worked. The parking lot is a nightmare of blind spots and not good to walk across, but as a destination for surrounding neighborhoods, it succeeds. People use those paths all day long to go to the shops, the bank, Java House. At half a mile away, I'm at about the outer limit for what most people will do. About four -five blocks is as much as most people are interested in. But I don't see that sort of thinking worked into this new plan. I'd encourage the Commission to take a look at what's been designed so far from the perspective of a one -car or no - car family, and consider how far this family's going to have to walk to get to a store, the new elementary school, or an ingress/egress point on Rohret. I'm wondering why there is no off-street bike path network funneling to the elementary school so that the kids can get themselves back and forth safely, and can grow up with a modicum of independence and an idea that bikes are means of transportation. I'm wondering where the corner restaurants are that aren't inconveniently far away for walking to. It seems to me someone's designed a place that assumes that every human over the age of 15 has at least one car/van/truck, and has designed the place to be, first and foremost, convenient for vehicles, which is surely an idea we're trying to move away from. Even EVs are tremendously resource -intensive: yes, they're better than combustion cars, but not nearly as good as transit, walking, and biking. In fact I would just say, start there: imagine you have no car. Don't freak out, just imagine it. What is this district like to live in for you? If you push away that idea, then you are designing with your car at the center of your life. And that's a thing we need to stop doing. (I drive my car about once a week, sometimes less. I work at home, the 10 bus goes right past my house, I can walk to a grocery store, bank, etc. in under ten minutes, my kid walked scootered and biked to elementary school with a ton of other kids going her way and later walked to high school, and I have a great running/walking path a few hundred feet away.) i I'm also looking at this pond/park arrangement and thinking, well, that's a lot of pond, but (as far as I can tell) not really very much park: why not? I'm also looking at the housing mix you're arranging here, and it seems to me that by islanding higher -density housing, you're zoning for student rental (see Cascade Ln, Rushmore, etc.), rather than creating an integrated housing mix that encourages individuals and small families to live in apartments and townhouses rather than buying 2600+ sqft houses to rattle around in on their own, or simply being priced out. Dense=green, dense=prudent, dense=equitable. I just think we can do a lot better than this, and I'd like to see some comparison neighborhoods from places where they've been taking more socially and environmentally responsible design seriously, which are places where the developers have also been persuaded that those are smart ways to build. There isn't really any reason why we have to design areas to look and behave pretty much as they've done around here for decades, with a tweak or two. We can build sustainability and sociability into this in a more intentional and muscular way. best, amy charles iowa city 2 Kirk Lehmann From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Bowen, Jay <jay-bowen@uiowa.edu> Tuesday, November 8, 2022 9:23 AM Kirk Lehmann Southwest District Plan Comments image-1.png; image-2.png ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Good morning, Kirk. I am writing to submit some comments on the Southwest District Plan in advance of the public hearing on November 16, 2022. One thing I notice from the survey results is the overwhelming support for park and recreational space in the new development. 87.7% of people surveyed responded that they would like to see parks and outdoor recreation areas in the new development, and this was by far the most popular item. I see from the new plans for the district that there is a nice affordance for pedestrian paths, but I wondered why the current park planning does not include an extension of green space and paths from Slothtower Street south through the new development area. It was my understanding that the city intended to maintain a ring of green space beginning from Hunter's Run Park, continuing through the Johnson County Poor Farm and adjacent lands, and extending along the current city boundary along Slothtower Street where there is already some prairie being preserved. I think it would be beneficial to both the attractiveness of the new development, the livability of the city, the health and happiness of our citizenry, and in benchmarking with other Midwestern cities to continue this greenbelt across Rohret Road and connect it to the planned park and lake, as shown in the attached diagrams. This would be a perfect place to extend Iowa City's current network of walking trails and bike paths, and new and current residents would benefit immensely from these amenities. Sincerely, Jay Bowen 1260 Deerfield Drive i 1- gn 3 z 2 CD 0. 0 0 0 ina[1- 131TOddgo b o 1 Kirk Lehmann From: Sent: To: Subject: Nick W <nick.wehrle@gmail.com> Thursday, November 3, 2022 9:05 AM Kirk Lehmann Re: Nov. 16 Public Hearing Set for SW District Plan (CPA22-0002) ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Hi Kent. Part of the plan to develop the Rohret South Subarea should include extending and improving Slothtower Rd to connect Rohret Rd to Melrose Ave. It would greatly improve access to the Interstate, reduce emergency response times, and significantly reduce traffic volume on Shannon Dr and Mormon Trek. The construction on the bridge on Rohret Rd during September / October was a huge problem for our community. Thanks, Nick Wehrle 1680 Lake Shore Dr On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 8:25 AM Kirk Lehmann <KLehmann@iowa-citv.org> wrote: Dear Stakeholder, As you're aware, the City has been updating its Southwest District Plan, including background information and the future vision for the Rohret South Subarea, which is south of Rohret Road and west of Highway 218 (CPA22-0002). Additional information, including redlined and simple copies of proposed changes to the plan, are available on the project website at www.icgov.org/sw-plan-update. The Southwest District Plan is a component of the City's Comprehensive Plan, which serves as the guiding policy document for growth and development in the city. The Comprehensive Plan identifies proposed areas and policies for housing, commercial uses, public services, streets and trails, and parks and open space. It may be amended by the City Council, following a consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission has set a public hearing to review the Southwest District Plan Amendment on November 16, 2022 at 6:00 pm in Emma Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City. You are welcome to attend the public hearing to present your views concerning this proposed plan amendment. You may also submit written information to me for consideration in advance, and I will include your comments in the information to be 1 considered by the Commission. Following a recommendation by the Commission, City Council will also set and hold a hearing where additional comments will be accepted. Note that the hearing is subject to change, so you may wish to call 319-356-5247 or check the Planning and Zoning Commission's website, www.icgov.org/p&z, the week of the hearing to confirm the agenda and location. If the hearing is cancelled or postponed, it will be considered at the next meeting of the Commission. The Commission's website will also contain a staff report on the proposed plan amendment the Monday before the hearing. If you know of any interested party who has not received a copy of this message, we would appreciate you informing them. If you have any questions regarding this case or the amendment process for the Comprehensive Plan, please contact me at 319-356-5247 or email klehmann@iowa-city.org. Sincerely, Kirk Lehmann, AICP Associate Planner =I IOWA CITY' A Ulla CO Ci:!r CIF LIFERA1URE 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Main: 319-356-5230 Direct: 319-356-5247 WWW.icgay.org Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 2 Kirk Lehmann From: V Fixmer-Oraiz<vfixmeroraiz@astigplanning.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2022 10:14 AM To: Kirk Lehmann Subject: Re: Draft Southwest District Plan Update Available Online ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Hi Kirk, Thanks for this update, it was great seeing you in Ottumwa! I was wondering if it's possible to change the name of the farm on the maps and throughout the document to read :" Johnson County Historic Poor Farm". Without the 'historic' qualifier, it makes it sound like the county is still utilizing this practice and we've gotten push back from vocal county residents :) For example, on page 12, it would be great to change it on the map there and also in the text. I would add that not only are there local non profit organizations, but the county hosts the Land Access Program, which leases smaller land plots (1/8 acre- 2 acres) for small farming operations. Thanks! V On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:02 AM Kirk Lehmann <KLehmann@iowa-citv.org> wrote: Dear Stakeholders, Thank you for your interest in the Southwest District Plan update. The draft plan is now available on the project website at www.icgov.org/sw-plan-update under "Schedule & Input". You can find two versions of the draft update: 1. Tracked Changes (redlined): This version shows proposed changes to the Southwest District Plan, including additions (which are underlined) and deletions (which are notated by strike-throughs). 2. Simple Changes (not redlined): This version shows what the text of the Southwest District Plan would look like with if all proposed changes are accepted. This version is easier to read, but may make it difficult to determine which changes were made. The project timeline has also been updated. Staff currently anticipates that the Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on November 16, 2022 at 6:00 pm in Emma Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City. This update has been assigned case number CPA22-0002. Because the meeting is subject to change, you may wish to call 319-356-5247 or check the City of Iowa City's website, www.icgov.org/p&z, the week of the meeting to confirm the meeting agenda. City Council will hold another public hearing after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. i You are welcome to attend all public meetings to present your views concerning this update. You may also submit written information to me in advance of the meetings, and I will include your comments in the information to be considered by the Commission. If you know of any interested party who is not on the Southwest District Plan contact list, we would appreciate it if you would inform them of these updates. Please do not hesitate to contact me at klehmann@iowa-city.orgor 319-356-5247 if you have any questions or comments about this plan update or if you would like more information on the plan update process. Regards, Kirk Lehmann, AICP Associate Planner I11A CITY A UN'LSC'O Ci; 7 Of LI TERM LIRE 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Main: 319-356-5230 Direct: 319-356-5247 www..icgov org 0 Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. V Fixmer-Oraiz, AICP 2 (they, them) CEO & Founder 319.243.3426 astigplanning.com 3 Kirk Lehmann From: richard schmidt <ontheroad56@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 1:10 PM To: Kirk Lehmann Subject: Re: Draft Southwest District Plan Update Available Online ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Thank you , Kirt A lot of thought went into this proposal From: Kirk Lehmann <KLehmann@iowa-city.org> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 10:01 AM To: Kirk Lehmann <KLehmann@iowa-city.org> Subject: Draft Southwest District Plan Update Available Online Dear Stakeholders, Thank you for your interest in the Southwest District Plan update. The draft plan is now available on the project website at www.icgov.org/sw-plan-update under "Schedule & Input". You can find two versions of the draft update: 1. Tracked Changes (redlined): This version shows proposed changes to the Southwest District Plan, including additions (which are underlined) and deletions (which are notated by strike-throughs). 2. Simple Changes (not redlined): This version shows what the text of the Southwest District Plan would look like with if all proposed changes are accepted. This version is easier to read, but may make it difficult to determine which changes were made. The project timeline has also been updated. Staff currently anticipates that the Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on November 16, 2022 at 6:00 pm in Emma Harvat Hall, City Hall, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City. This update has been assigned case number CPA22-0002. Because the meeting is subject to change, you may wish to call 319-356-5247 or check the City of Iowa City's website, www.icgov.org/p&z, the week of the meeting to confirm the meeting agenda. City Council will hold another public hearing after a recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission. You are welcome to attend all public meetings to present your views concerning this update. You may also submit written information to me in advance of the meetings, and I will include your comments in the information to be considered by the Commission. If you know of any interested party who is not on the Southwest District Plan contact list, we would appreciate it if you would inform them of these updates. Please do not hesitate to contact me at klehmann@iowa-city.org or 319-356-5247 if you have any questions or comments about this plan update or if you would like more information on the plan update process. Regards, Kirk Lehmann, AICP Associate Planner 1 ® I1A CITY A UHZSCQ :i: Y OF LIFERAlURE 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Main: 319-356-5230 Direct: 319-356-5247 WWW. /cgo v. orP o Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 2 To Whom it May Concern, With the new 20-year plan being developed for the southwest planning district, we wanted to provide written concerns and opinions as a neighborhood about the plan specifically as it relates to Kitty Lee Road (KLR). The drafts of the plan available to us so far have shown that KLR is planned to be made into a through road, with the current cul-de-sac being removed and turned into a continued roadway. As Kirk Lehman has further explained, in this scenario, it is likely that KLR would be the only road connecting to new development for an undetermined amount of time, making KLR into what is realistically an arterial road. While we realize that KLR is likely to have new roads connected to it closer to Highway 1, we are strongly against the plan to turn the cul-de-sac into a through street because; the road is not set up well to have increased traffic, KLR could be the only connection point to development in the area for an unforeseen amount of time, and because cul-de- sacs offer their residents relative quiet and privacy that we'd wish to maintain. KLR is not set up well for increased traffic because of the design of the road. In other words, KLR is not a good candidate for an arterial road. The road itself has two steep hills that it is possible to get air on going only around 50mph on. Lexington Ave was another road that people could get air on, and the ultimate solution for that road was to turn it back into a dead end. We are concerned that people would travel over whatever the posted speed limit would be, especially at the crest of the hill. Additionally, KLR has many driveways connecting directly to it which is a feature that the city has elsewhere tried to avoid on newly developed arterial roads. Not only are there many driveways that connect directly to KLR, several of them are quite close to the steep hill and are blind to traffic on the other side of the hill (this problem exists traveling in both directions). These homeowners would experience a dramatic increase in risk of accident pulling out of their own driveways. Slowing traffic down with speed bumps is a likely solution to speeding that we also do not favor. Speed bumps are a band -aid to the problem of drivers not being able drive the speed they want, where they want. Conversely, city planning is the solution to drivers being able to drive the speed they want, where they want. Speed bumps are never an ideal solution and are not desirable in any situation. Our request is that the city doesn't impose a traffic load that merits speed bumps or opens the door for dangerous traffic patterns. An arterial road that is independent of KLR is a solution that solves both of these potential problems. The development of land west and north of KLR depends on landowners annexing and/or selling to developers. As of right now, there are two landowners who seem to be eager to annex in this area, but neither of them connects to Highway 1. And with the city seeming unwilling to connect more development to Rohret Road until more through roads connecting to Highway 1 are constructed, KLR is the only existing road to connect new development to. It is not right for the residents of KLR (a dead-end road) to get stuck with the increased traffic that Rohret can't handle. (As explained above, KLR can't handle the increased traffic either.) Until other landowners who do border Highway 1 sell/annex, KLR could be the only connection to new development near it for an indeterminate amount of time. It's not an exaggeration to say that it could be a decade or more until another arterial road is able to be put in between Highway 1 and Rohret, relieving traffic from KLR. Even if a new arterial road is constructed, KLR is likely to have sustained increased traffic because people will get used to using it, and if KLR in some way connects to Rohret, even indirectly, KLR will be the most tempting route to take because it would be the first connecting road leaving town on Highway 1 or the last connecting road before Mormon Trek on Rohret. The appropriate way for the city to develop, therefore, is to wait until a new, separate arterial road is able to be put in before developing. KLR residents shouldn't have to bear the burden of development that has gotten ahead of its own connecting infrastructure. Langenberg Ave is an example of development getting ahead of itself. Before McCollister Blvd connected, Langenberg was used as the arterial road, even though it was an indirect path between South Gilbert and Sycamore Street. I was one of the people who used Langenberg as an arterial road before McCollister connected —showing that people will use the routes available to them even if that route is not the intended traffic pattern. The residents of Langenberg had to put up with traffic for years that their road was not intended to handle, and still have to put up with the speed bumps to this day. It is much better to wait until a true arterial road can be constructed rather than hoping that KLR can be used as a stop -gap to access new development. KLR residents chose the street for the low traffic and relative quiet that it has offered residents for nearly 40 years, and we would like it to stay that way. As Kirk has explained, the city has a general preference to avoid cul-de-sacs in new development because while the people at the back end of the cul-de-sacs have low traffic and quiet, the people at the front end take on all the traffic and noise. But this reasoning doesn't hold up for existing cul-de-sacs like KLR because they've been that way for years, and it especially doesn't hold up because KLR connects directly to a state highway. The entity suffering from the increased traffic and noise from the cul-de-sac that is KLR is Highway 1, which can handle all the traffic and noise that KLR can give it. Therefore, the main reasons for the city to avoid cul-de-sacs don't really apply in KLR's case. Additionally, the noise from 218 makes KLR not as quiet as a typical cul-de-sac to begin with. The last thing the neighborhood wants is more traffic noise. Finally, as an anecdote, my fiance and I were house shopping this time last year, and settled on a house on KLR. While we liked houses and could afford them on streets like Kirkwood, Rochester, Court, and Sunset, we specifically avoided streets like those because of the amount of traffic on them. While development is likely to raise property values on KLR in a monetary sense, that same development devalues homes in a personal sense to people like me and other KLR residents. People choose the type of street they live on for good reason and it is unfair for homeowners to have the type of street they chose dramatically changed. It is therefore inappropriate to take away the cul-de-sac at the end of KLR. As the city has presented and talked about future development between Highway 1 and Rohret near 218, it seems clear that KLR is currently intended to be used as the first arterial road to this intended development, even if only for a period of time. The residents of KLR would not be in favor of the road connecting or being extended up at the cul-de-sac for any amount of time. We are not asking or saying that there should be no other roads connecting to KLR, but that the appropriate place to make such connections is south of the existing neighborhood. As a neighborhood we feel strongly about not removing the existing cul-de-sac and creating a through street using KLR. Signed, Mark Alatalo, 4053 KLR Co -signed, Karalee Smith, 4053 KLR Matt and Jill Tentinger, 4047 KLR Vicki and Del Concha, 4086 KLR Dave and Regina Alatalo, 3671 Olde Oak Ln Patti Davis, 4059 KLR Mary and Gary Ott, 4056 KLR John and Regina Arthur, 4104 KLR Barb Hulme, 4090 KLR Justen Concha, former resident Jarod Concha, former resident Kirk Lehmann From: Jill Tentinger <jill.tentinger@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 1:09 PM To: Kirk Lehmann Subject: Questions/Comments for SW Development Plan ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Questions - • Will Kitty Lee Road be annexed into the city limits? Will curb, gutter and utilities be added? At whose expense? The city's? Or the individual homeowner's? • If Kitty Lee is connected to the new neighborhood, will the concrete bus turn -around be torn out? • Are there contracts in place for the city to purchase all the farm ground in the development areas? Or will private developers be purchasing the land and doing all the infrastructure for development? • What does Phase 0 mean? I would not assume that this area is ready to be developed. Oaknoll owns some of that land and was possibly going to put a retirement community on that site. Is Oaknoll selling this tract (or part of it) to the city? Or another developer? Is Oaknoll still possibly planning on a retirement community in this area? • What is the duration of this plan? Starting date, if approved? How many years till the entire area is completely developed? "Timeline based on demand", so this would all be dependent on if farmers will sell? If developers will develop? • Was Jesse Allen's development idea not approved by the county? Is his plan going back to Iowa City P&Z? • Does Iowa City have a new rule against cul-de-sac streets in residential neighborhoods? When Teg was connected to Aber, it became a very busy cut -through, but the streets off Teg were cul-de-sacs therefore maintaining a quiet, safe, neighborhood feel. Your new plan with hundreds of city blocks looks like downtown Chicago. I feel like traffic will be heavy even on your "neighborhood" streets. Comments - • We do not want Kitty Lee Road to connect to any new or existing streets/roads. • We do not want to be annexed into the city limits. • We do appreciate the city considering the survey feedback and scaling back the density of development between our house and Rohret. But we don't want park traffic or cut -through traffic coming down Kitty Lee Rd. Have you considered, or are you willing, to meet with us from Kitty Lee Road? Quite a few of the homeowners are original owners and can let you know firsthand how busy and dangerous our road was back when it was a thoroughfare. The hills are very dangerous at any speed above 30 mph and with driveways on both sides, we all usually drive about 20 mph on our road just to be safe. i Thanks, JiUTentiOger 319.631.5452 z Kirk Lehmann From: Tack, Richard A <rich-tack@uiowa.edu> Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 10:48 AM To: Kirk Lehmann Subject: Re: [External] RE: Please add me to the contact list for SW subarea updates **This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Hi Kirk, Thank you so much for your response. I really do appreciate it. I was able to find the PDF document of the posters. If you are still accepting comments from the public I'd like to add one if I may. I do think you've done a great job with the initial plan. I know it must be difficult to weigh all the competing considerations. But I was wondering, regarding the North end of Maier Ave., if you could offset it off the centerline more to the East (just the part from just south of Kessler Dr. to Rohret Rd.)? Our house is at the intersection of Maier Ave. and Kessler Dr. and it is very close to Maier Ave. already. A wider Maier Ave., plus a sidewalk would put it very close to our walkout basement door. Since you have to jog Maier over to the East to line up with Wild Prairie anyway, and completely rebuild Maier Ave. I don't think it would add anything to the cost of the project. Thank you so much for your consideration. Sincerely, Rich Tack From: Kirk Lehmann <KLehmann@iowa-city.org> Date: Tuesday, September 6, 2022 at 7:57 AM To: Tack, Richard A <rich-tack@uiowa.edu> Subject: [External] RE: Please add me to the contact list for SW subarea updates Hello Richard, Thank you for your interest in the Southwest District Plan update. You have been added to the contact list. You can find the posters on the project website at www.icgov.org/sw-plan-update under "Schedule & Input". Let me know if you have any issues or questions in the meantime. Regards, Kirk Lehmann, AICP Associate Planner City of Iowa City 319-356-5247 1 From: Tack, Richard A <rich-tack@uiowa.edu> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 1:17 PM To: Kirk Lehmann <KLehmann@iowa-city.org> Subject: Please add me to the contact list for SW subarea updates **This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Could you please add my email address to your contact list for updates to the IC SW subarea plan update. Also, they said at the meeting at Webber last night that all of the materials presented were available on your website. I can't seem to find anything. Can you send me a link to the visuals, maps, and information presented on the posters that were on display? Thank you so much. Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 2 a- U .2- oL o»CE/2/V/.Pir S o fr 77/ e S S \i/s 7 e.i C y� L4-Ai (fp D4 re-. ✓ DO- Nor N cL do 71C //v ci d a cod E4 6-L S s ONOT y / o'/ C op Aa jpfs o%r s.W. / o/% SeEP Mac/ co -7- Ec 7'. 1,r/ e Pe /74- /' N /✓2 17 14/c .4/4 V c EGA 2. / yI/tIN \-5 N y ./`7 4)4/ J 6- //T E✓74-/ 2v roe c�/�d� d EO EN d c AL-7- 7y, )A) 46fE6R/v ; v rsT wC -44°C cisi /-41 o h'rvcs0N cN 7/. WC- WiL ( NOT tom- pow ccd 7n>I e-, 67o J //uvi-cc/ `7p 7 y (24- �L.Srwcn �z� can" } ` v c G e 2 E �`i ��t % 02 4/d d �� C%'4/2 9 c c( Ny Le oN a 9/V 7, /7o/u J= / ffis) s 71✓7g41,64J A/074 ble7-4-7r. (94 14/e L ✓'(l e i%-deF G 7 why /�o� 04/4 c/' yU 1%9'(%e- NCy- J�/ 6-T re& G c 7 -7. ✓v L/O L (�c cl ✓ iv G4'-/UNe °,r✓ ,€,t 13 24N cY 70- ,I% rt/cL o,c C- B/ ✓�j�oNc, / 0 9t5 £ CT / c Gv ,1eU y Lrii(/7_ Div NO 7deec Lc tee ✓.zc it V dp % 4 Low:cone r /c ypF /74N rin e✓7� t 4S G4 Tre c( 0 y / O(jc/Z 7-4 CA tY C(11L5 O j J. F 4 A/c 42i Al re de � / 7- .5.,yo Z of a c off- r6e %264'w,1>/ # / Fail0N 7.<- Gc NvT 6N C)We" T 4- tiC4 Cic KsCJi0 OLJ % d a/fic( }C✓LST ✓C/0Gram• /1/41) /N (r 2 ss,.s 7✓j/ c. o A)7ziuu 5 L E Tj�� e- esc�`�3 -1 Co y L J? a c dNLS/terPIt e % j� s c,t/, ,,:e/,y ritcit/J 3• 6-4JN&sT Zow Co/7e. oore, e v ,�� 5',Cl/'®A'S Jj`!i 2/7/0 �s e J CO rr4 e_, /`✓/Ali 10 ' sc (Ec,>r / 00/.kZ -5/.F.7 e ✓7c4-Ns 937 7-M4-7- sZ L L o 9s cs./709-✓ � 774- c5 -1 ,V CC 7 e» /L c� o yk7 �£c.7 /7/0hs��vvGa AJO-No- Cow olcZS' ICJ 7o,J,C/ 3v5U cS/jett .170 9Jc F-04 sS%/4} LG ,p✓J"JJ4°//ccs-, ✓� G�f C y 4-//' x S✓�O-// f e_ did �ScLss d� �-r-y � L ®- CA c L o 6 2T7gcv? poll 4 lic G4R d CI Ai 4 �t�-cif 4-C'c, p9 }/.t/7 c5o,i2 2 Co 7-7-4 GAS NCLcArc-d oh cc /l r°('NciIv 704069,4 cyc_. - yc,t»7c 64-f4 Q CS &t7V kirJ. CO 77 da la ?oo cSQ. 8c3_Q2_ cS"Q.-_ F� . _ 0/2 c, pia 6/s - y To-- 6- Ail cc, '"_rr7 7,4/Z o er k/12(6--#TE 7-4c..rigni. 4-43 o gitz noic 0 4/ N ER s cTem2, 210 N 4aOc, 7/e. ✓ / & e s ow / 7`i 4- r S 4 N- cil74-ePiG T_ s G�oPs iiv'7 /tr elfT 7�4z i L67? A--- L fe CR t4 rS qd`j / Pep(-c 2/Pc. 01 _/ ci zv a LV/v /col 4'9 d f 7-1/c c� 7'h c o c7 cc/7 city- flop,vUc `7/1/A7 ✓.s 1914A/ / NOT Coto of Ooc7trd7c,J7-e r` (/,1 % L/}.�/� o r(s'c'i 9/7,14/ 74 ✓” `61-iT- Co Zc. Ott' Nc Co cm 7 I 7Pe r°>Fe /y rN7 4/1' 7> cs/7,p G C L xx- JCt7,`c u1cro .j oN 78 fr—r c,,, c r 7 fl,q7 /v4r' c Fob 0� yv/`7y 1/ELL y c SyS 7 e,/7 . 09di'/ii / 0 LW Writ, / -_4 179(7/ A/o7 -7/iS �rrr, s73'7c Ttj7rvJt Ja L L 71 „.c_ clas ssi>,4-7/- v rr4 5 LcLf c. N Qc Ua 7-0` C 7: oN Ls}iMd E-C7. 4 7 76 18. SS174L L _�t/e,w ✓` rJ C� /U 7//Z4 //Z✓ _ U7 dflic '7y7c,$ NP_f qjj ,���/.9� C� _ 7 A/c fir/ 0_ cS c - L-c1__, ea s Ci`7-y /-c/47ED` fO/tcr� o U — /�j� e �JS C 44 Cc ?. c s ,tom Z £ 47E/� city, L/ cj -n 0/7//fN` c 00 e c50y4SCowl/-AU St'4 2 Z-�`/.70 €7,073-' o e c2114,�7y, 7_ CSJ/o,t rr cL s et 0/2Ai2/,fi C oc5 c 14,,47-0 f 0g C, Q C C.9 4JS c e(57/Ci. #9✓74Ai ti 4rs Gt0L 7 /rr Gc/i L L Q c SS/4 C 770110 G eJ 1' 1-7 y c}, /7oeca, OC 0De00 EA:647CKCS; ram 24/01 F� ®� svci /oAc..5-../* ss A/o'v <51/2/oUcLr'AI ECT fo & ` eN/d4S G ed.4 Zy« c 5 EN,/ 04±t • Z chici7:6 on rJ'7-00_r.S'LAS ._. a 0 cS Gi1/21.4- c cm/Ty4 LAU 5 DAJ J c,SG Lc, - (. , o e4-(7 CAD/ IL/ eN U- C Is _/ 02.,77,_ //act C-C`S, _ f 0 t•cfc c) cT# rf rJUT &"#o Le_ cs-t L c /ate•% ow, , 4 coe L _,, r-v/`%fir Cat e- `774- CA ra - u A/ a _ft._ft. v cS' 7� 7`C k c4- p Al v rOZ _ _. 7-' Q c kai' % 776 c-i> • y0 le)C( /Or Z0 'W o/74 / ,r✓ 7s rev c G c d `44 `71 c 4 z c it Gr/trir 047 /✓'cc/u cc ,/ A/o7' i7s 4 i/6 �A/'1/4-(-4-- 6-c • N0- Zi`✓7r' 7- 770✓vs Ct CL oijs o'0ic 447,.0 c* J/C4G 7ij CgH C 3 CAfr 7e b-- #c-4-6.74 /in c Z/ `fi -1// o vc-ti • U. osuoi ccuva74`,ei c cork c �i//f c ✓v 2L ec zt `c Q /' L 14-7 ai`zzu- cco' 7-cyo G�1 csciu/ ootS 4 ritGAG lj CFe-4'. 6- 0 07 c54 U df c 4-y'70 d/d. / (0,47/i(/ G.7 Clow7/CS (_ / dJ /0 v it1� .lc _- -_. �f-��-^ �_-Gam%-�r/MCP._. -it Ala 7 T7W/ j//s op OF QS ON Sa 9 74, 4/1 °F v 4 ci - 77}� C W � L `frc }/ rat idsc it C 9 mil/ GAL 1' y S.S ,fr77CS 07 i_ Z cilL, yA o tu/v Z4,4 J7 c4Z e(s-J-_ /T_`f fel v.i n- __L4,vd 1,yc/!, , //I � Ct �� UL �fiNts Av SR , le al o c�N �fS • WC No7 ccrs �- cS' G P. sc a cap..) cogyp' Zy 0,04-4 c,� f vo of � &'0 U o 1 O cf c Z4ti � — �57 --'' Ol7'%1-% G 4N CCU t°' G `1 c U O c/v,/ j" "' ?tic ��.vd c . C/7crM✓k/ rs 8 frtv/ji C //�C .-(.S(soci%�7"r.f' ¥ �',c/7 9_1' %s .7exiy� Memo To: Kirk Lehmann, City of Iowa City From: Dan Black Managing Partner, Black Hills Farms LLC Date: January 6, 2021 Subject: South Rohret Subarea- Land Use Planning District General Commints: • Inclusion of portions of the area south of Highway #1 would make for a more comprehensive and accurate vision for growth planning in this Southwest District. • A comprehensive look, in conjunction with IDOT and other transportation planners, for widening (four lanes and a frontage road system) for Highway #1. Extend the widened Highway #1 west to Sharon Center Road or Slothower Road. It is critical that Highway #1 be included in this district plan, both north and south sides. Highway #1 serves as a major East/West route accessing Highway # 218 as well as Iowa City proper, it needs improvement and needs to be a major element for consideration for this planning process and future growth. The future development of the Oak Knoll parcel further suggests need for Highway #1/ Kitty Lee improvement. • Recommend consideration be given to designation of the Burns parcel located west of the intersection of Kitty Lee and Highway #1 for public use, schools, fire stations, park, etc. • Referencing the "Future Land Use Map" and the accessing of the Carson Lake Project via Kitty Lee road; going straight North on Kitty Lee and angling northwest across Burns and Black Hills is the best alternative. The North West angle road is the safest due to topography and accessing Carson Lake at a more central location. Discussion/Questions Per Power point a. Like/Dislike about Area? Like the rolling hills, sunsets, and vista views, yet close proximity to Iowa City. Designs to maximize these features are a positive. Dislike the heavy traffic and the speed it travels on Highway #1. b. Opportunities and Challenges? Both an opportunity and a challenge is the topography. We have B slope ranging to F slope. One opportunity is to use good old fashioned contour lines to guide road and street locations. c. See in the next 20 years? —An adequate and safe road system, both in developments as well as major access roads. A logical and comprehensive reworking of Highway #1. d. What Distinguishes this Area? The vistas and rolling hills. Its westside location, near U of IA and U of IA Hospital's, as well as ICSD schools including Weber and West High. e. Pervious Concept? I like the Lake; water features are positives. Lot density seems high. f. Other considerations? Look for opportunities to include parks and trails. Look for opportunities to include prairies, wetlands particularly as it relates to water management. There are at least three existing farm type ponds in this district include them in design. Other Thoughts: The whole S.W. District Plan, the Carson Lake Project and Iowa City's progressive nature, begs for "out of box" thinking. read with great interest the community of Cumming, Iowa approving, the Middlebrook Development, an "agrihood" concept that may include community gardens or perhaps even a small working farm. A concept worth exploring. /-7e-go o a / q/7—D4 Trs A/o7/'ce. — l - 7 /7 1V 0 7 5T4/rc //o11r E ,N0 ifs c o wNF47) @r/e .4JfC. NoT 4/?T d y NY ,10 (e(57/V G= c G o p 7 eN Ts; 1 t/E Je -cifE4Gc oLv/V E,C3 ', j7/ P,o, 2,tN d L 0 9J6 E -- 0 L-yN ERs . C ) � e ,yICc 4 ,c. a t_ ' c cyclic/ T ® C/7" coU T1sO97GC4sit 0 LS'icic1/ATcJ tr4-xs5C7 e �`� NOT �k'4iT T7 of L'e 11/ c cs e�s�,v c7/'rs `' £-G 7; J Tit OS csl/o y L c S o -i e i2 0 %1 S/pm-A) cf / N G ,t oel G/ ®w e0 coU d ics �, a� 126z - do Grp/, 7J7 iLS 4 e'ef/l) F. k' e. t70(%c c d`77 ON h% Ta Gc% ckti.lis CLFEA, -TX v7/IT 1:70Ater ./rc% -e0/) CJ�T A (a) 4s nil zq s Ai El Gh'8o4's Jo-- N NT 7-e- a o wA C, - Fe/ c+c, 7-1J -N d P Ai Co N. . G/PI'S/ CAI Of s CO%l eo tC __C,(5riirc s s Al Or 7-)7 J /) / / - - / G `/r/ `" .J tics 7 /14- vit G'/C. ass L/. NSWF041(EliTi°F�sT k/dPDii/ N /.cicl/?f J 9� O4res o ct . 4c5a-- ZET 6-• It 4 / /1/4.s iepeirELo� �Ls taco-d q c-z� 7-OR , Chi Cit� �, �PoN o %rRs Z o c- c,�j c!/E/.G�A-Las _ / N _ . - /! o,t/ T o c,4dJefL .t 000cs, 7 cv o-Qcs eA C -a at. 8 `>/Z 7 . 0 'N PR s. Ri'6- /s, hJ Ti/- C&ij4 (3 N TEN T/ 4 l�j c to is L L NOT / o wi yocr , NN x e,s /Jury o 4 i' 7/ j 7_1-X t S o Y 7- or c o es., e,/• If; t'C GeT� kijcN `STATE Cv y t/ T� j o c 4-L, j �� �o a7;� Ny o 7nr4C CLWC4 lei c L 1-`Tc,S o cif ✓ ,'cvf T,�' %eJ -'JC/ - 49_S 7 % `Cc", %j C7 -4A i`cs 0 y 7✓ k,/ TA( C(04 it / AI fc'V )0r es -Tf//us v w,s Lv'/et, L 6 c g De%IT oniL ty Eve_ oUCH-SoO `l MW c j 7D0 44_ t- L (--v w/ A/ . jo Ci,s / ,c/ % DelcL Eris CC7• Tot_ eye ys ZAR 9 e. C_ `tiv oI Z4Nc1 lLd Z/f/Z�j -)Ge c7,t/ c..`) /�'y i o' %o ctS rS D N, Cr A/c- Or U CA0 8eit/73- AV 72, -C. oyll %DZycs'I` c_ o ctSC- y o o s p r S o U cS p pT. gjZE o� ?}fie 7Z4 / l( ow41s -T Z/4,1/d 747/ t ijo gs C_ 5 &vr, C 0 WA) EIL �4/Zrip( cS Tcs o4 C¢) / LI Coe/c A 6-4-iN1/457- 0 e 7r /' L & o &. e -__i- // 0 (1) p yr, 67 4/C P4 COO 7o a.__. o WC , re . /c k'11 4-N _ 4 .-_-.off-yji_LX o 4,41i / e. L ,5 01 km) ee, s- Z-41v , 70c it 77 7i 00 7714- Z e k o 4';A/rk j /dad 411i r-/rot =_A/0- VA Cf c / 7 ere .w,f%c_ ma`s_ L' e L ( CUetoe4,5✓ -et_o0 Gt"fjole(It Z-e___r `07 4 C/`7 oxlzZ t,z ir,41 qj lteC_ nr, c_'i 6. t r `iLl_ r ` 1'4S_, ..4x /-V 4// �--A Of/ ' 7 tali u CJ/44� 9 c 7--i- C - 0''�1 c J$'e4 0/9 / one i-s 4 w e. matt t L50,1-2 L Co 7 7 :9 rS C4 46 /Aks,„ v q 7 ,v / h e Co yw7st �' . Z 0AJC.. 0 e PNT ' L-L Co %-4- 9' - - wi--- 4---mack o n c/{��.I i G f-gt A 9 c- -oN - c/t-� — EA cif U c.5' e j . _ o-- ,//70 tv Gie.4.5s (±) * 5-- / S 9 S 0- tv�J - cc cc cj T EA//o ti- z---L ,a r L c p / 04,14 r .; r y ;r ev cost/ r 74e es --� w. f 7 yob ,q<so�a of r9c4Z-, CU (AI ®N es /SST _ tJ G y7o %c t 5 Co T7�- 9 — r esocAll tvc cfev _ 6-- 0 O crT -fit boor, Tt// - 45 .�- L/ rS oN /// CA/J�045; A SL6rx Zy eAfoQ/ /� Ny ✓/ U v4 ' 7 L yr q7 r/%rN7,1' rec v -g /a dicicb(-77-ifaivi‘ cis-7 Job's e i rUE 00677'7977oovt( ZA1vta4 A/'0AI 7` Jy(c4 , GUc IMP( O7H E/2 ta C ,r4 LJ 0- %,/,' L. L No 7 _ d e CoNroRiit 0 A. CO /7, G>.‘ 6L. .(/I` atr(cA %err062// of Cy0/ r et/6_� 1 , %/;Q , 7- 094 O41 a�cJ Sti_ c �o hr� Cf cif-7c _ 0 92 o km1 Cooei�i'�,V D2 c Zo,ves v N ©y& Z 4,uy o O -r- Livy i N o Draft Future Land Use Ma •• Attachment 3 3r `illl�1lt CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE 0 T3 Neighborhood Edge a T3 Neighborhood General O T4 Neighborhood Small T4 Neighborhood Medium a T4 Main Street ® open Subdatrict El School District ® other Civic Public open Space Q Private Open Space Proposed Stommrater Lake - Neighborhood Street - Major Street • Pedestrian Passage • "Things You Like" t• "Things You Continues to Highway 965 Dislike" •tinues to illSlothower Specific Feedback Place up to 3 stickers of each color on the draft land use map for things that you like or dislike, • Green = Things You Like • Red = Things You Dislike Pair with sticky notes for in-depth comments by numbering both the stickers and sticky notes. General Feedback Write any general comments about the map using sticky notes and place them around the edge of the poster. Comment Cards If you'd prefer to provide anonymous feedback, you can write on the comment cards. Comment cards also contain some prompts to gain additional feedback. Note This is a concept only. No development is proposed as part of this plan update. The plan guides future growth as private landowners become interested in annexing and developing. Additional info at www.icgov.org/sw-plan-update Open House Comment Cards September 1, 2022 Attachment 3 What do you like about the draft plan for the Rohret South Subarea? What would you change about the draft pan for the Rohret South Subarea? Anything else that should be considered when planning for the Subarea? Additional Comments Focus on natural features, walkability, alternative transportation options, and new schools. Possibility of light commercial uses is good too. More emphasis on multi- family/affordable housing types. Tie in parks areas to existing areas to existing ponds and other natural features. Add additionally ped/bike crossings across US218. More affordable housing please! I think it's well thought out for the long term. The idea of using "nodes" is interesting. Very important to have affordable housing. II don't like the proposed commercial area on the south side of Rohret Rd. There is a lot of traffic already and adding a commercial area would make it worse. I'm okay with a commercial area, just not directly off of Rohret. Trails, parks, wetlands, woodlands, and conservation areas very important. Plants should be specifically selected to support pollinators, birds, insects, and other native species. New Schools. New Rec Center -Possibly with a pool?. Extension of connector roads to highways. New sewer and water infrastructure. Add a dedicated middle school jr. high. Expand bus routes. Elementary school and a preschool and child care POOL POOL POOL - Put a pool in the rec center. Tanks in the area are closing and competitive swim teams need the lane space, especially in this SW corner of town. School district should buy into this to provide for teams. Carson lake plan -> No 1 Open House Comment Cards September 1, 2022 I like that a mixture of housing types and footprints are baked into the plan. The neighborhood north of Rohret is nice, but monolithic in lot size and ultimately exclusionary based on income and home ownership. More information about linked or delinked transporting plans to open up north/south routes to Melrose and Highway 1. Having and maintaining a core value of broadening opportunity for people of varied socioeconomic backgrounds to choose to live in the neighborhood Here in Iowa City we like to think of ourselves as progressive minded. This is an opportunity to manifest that perspective. I can not think of a single topic that is more important to inclusion access and opportunity than residential development. The choices here will affect the degree of socioeconomic and racial integration in this neighborhood for generations to come. Tethered to that is the diversity of schools, food accessibility, climate, action, and policing across the city. I urge you to provide the needs of the entire city and not just rely on the potentially vocal opinions of those currently in the neighborhood (like me) who I fear will emphasize self interest in property values and traffic over what's good for Iowa City I like the pond and the path around it. I like the neighborhood feel. I like the addition of more neighborhood commercial. The plan needs to be contingent on connecting Rohret road to Melrose via the Slothower right-of-way. Without that, the plan will only create more congestion. Connectivity of area. Development of more housing and mixed use commercial development Prioritize road connectivity. Slothower Ave to Rohret (connect to Melrose) Prioritize Melrose to Rohret Connection Would have been helpful to have presentation every 15 minutes or so to give information to all in organized form 2 Open House Comment Cards September 1, 2022 Neighborhood Nodes. Parks I would like to see more nature outdoor play space for the parks. Also would enjoy seeing trails for walking and riding bikes. I would not be in favor of low income coming to this area. Regional stormwater basin/lake. Commercial areas for surrounding neighborhoods. Single family housing transition near existing neighborhoods. Additional parks/open space. Push more density toward HWY 1 and less near Rohret Rd. Concerned about additional traffic on Rohret Rd. Absolutely nothing Throw it out and forget it If I wanted to live in Iowa City, I would have bought a house in town, not in the country. Strongly Oppose Additional schools. Regional park. 965 to Highway 1 roundabouts Alternative to get to the East of 218. The lake area. The commercial areas. The new school. Prioritize north/south connection to HWY 1 and Melrose/IWV increase in neighborhood commercial nodes. Trail connectivity Large development to activate growth Offset traffic on Rohret/. Address Mormon Trek traffic. Regional public park/lake. Rec Center. Neighborhood commercial nodes. Connections are key. With limited HWY 218 crossings the north/south connections to HWY 1 and Melrose are vital. nothing I (prefer) not to have a huge development right across the street from where I live. Leaving the area as is Park area around lake NO COMMERCIAL! DISLIKE PLACEMENT OF FIRE HOUSE Better Road success to Melrose and HWY 1. Less concrete for less runoff. More green areas. 3 Open House Comment Cards September 1, 2022 Another exit route from Rohret Rd - Connect through Slothower to Melrose The eight FT sidewalk is listed as a trail. It goes to Weber School. The City could take care of snow removal on the trail. A road connecting Rohret Rd with Melrose Ave via Connection through Slothower Rd. would improve traffic flow on Rohret. Parks, Fire Department. South access to road. Less access to Rohret road. City's far too busy and unsafe. No apartments. Less population density. Not have Watts develop. Paving/ creating safe access to south access points. Watts built our home, do not consider (them). WE NEED MORE SCHOOLS! Need more fire and police The nightmare scenario created by the development built by the Watts group presently West of Weber cannot be understated (we live there). Impossible to reach for grievances, contractors unsafe and environmentally a nightmare. Rohret has children walking on it by the hundreds every day. Heavy vehicles and contractors both create MASSIVE safety issues. All development must involve school development and expansion, and there needs more commitment to diversity. Too much is driven by affluence and isolation. This is not healthy for our community. Pond/walking trails. Park. no multifamily units. Pave Slothower Rd. to move traffic away from Rohret. Rohret is too busy too much heavy traffic. Cement dump trucks. 4 Open House Comment Cards September 1, 2022 Parks. Schools. Walk paths. Nodes The acreage off of Kitty Lee Rd that Oaknoll owns is essentially already park space. It has a pond, pine tree plantings, walnut tree plantings, and mowed trails. If possible, that land should be preserved as the natural area that it is. It could easily connect to proposed Carson pond/par. Kitty Lee Rd should be preserved and a road further south could connect to future proposed development. I like the amount of parks. I like the amount of trails I would add more trails for biking and 'running. Separate bike paths from roads compared to dangerous bike lanes. I wish for more diversity in housing. Traffic on Rohret Road, Meier Ave, and HWY 1 are already busy. {See Questions Tab} small footprint, low -intensity housing Need road connecting Rohret to Melrose sone today to eliminate traffic on Morgan Trek and road connecting to West High. Large lots are a must for this area to reduce traffic flow. Low income housing mixed with expensive housing would cause housing for expensive homes to be reduced. Mixing apples with oranges! i.e. Maintaining low income homes would be less and caused area to deteriorate. not much Concentrate on the area of Iowa City already developed and built up and improve those areas. Leave the farmland alone, Farmland and open areas are important. Leave them alone. Improve the areas of Iowa City that are already developed. Mix of commercial, single family, and multi -family. Also like plans for parks and schools. Convert the whole area into a large recreation area with miles and miles of mountain bike trails. Please don't over weight the opinions of all the old people who don't want multi - family dwellings anywhere near them. 5 Open House Comment Cards September 1, 2022 Introduction of some commercial space - ability to have place to walk to for coffee, a meal at a restaurant. Increase in public parks (size and number). I see the importance of higher density housing but like the idea of offsetting it with more open space. Perhaps open space to create symmetry (like 2 bookends) with the Poor Farm to the north of the neighborhood and easy places to get to and from the neighborhood and feel like you are still out in the country. I like the idea of "commercial nodes" useful! Green space, low intensity use Traffic over 218 and on Rohret is big concern A dog park! Leave Kitty Lee Road alone Keep Kitty Lee from becoming a thorough fare from HWY1 to Rohret. Do not annex Kitty Lee Road Neighborhood I do not like the current plan for my ground at 3257 Rohret Road. Need more density per the old zone overlay On the original concept we had commercial now we have low density. Need to buffer but need more density to help the area. Park/ Nature space Less general urban land use category. Prioritize roads, fire station and native space earlier in the plan. Safety risk to further develop with a fire station or additional roads (beside Rohret) for fire department to access. Traffic on Rohret if moving forward with Phase 1 without connections to Melrose/HWY1. Risk safety of developing in phase 1 without a fire station which is in phase 2b. Diversity, parks No commercial area near bridge over 218 Please decrease the speed limit in Rohret Rd. It's Residential! North/South road connection. Schools/park. Overall plan very nice. Junior High built ASAP. Developers should be force to agree to plan. 6 July 13, 2022 SOUTHWEST DISTRICT ROHRET SOUTH SURVEY RESULTS Q1: What is your interest in the Southwest District Plan update? (select all that apply) Answered: 168 I Skipped: 0 I live in or next to the subarea 87.3% I am an interested resident of Iowa City 29.8% I own land in or next to the subarea 20.8% I am an interested employee in Iowa City ■ 7.7% I work in or next to the subarea ■ 7.1% Other (please specify) 5.4% I am a business owner in Iowa City , 4.2% I participated in a focus group for the Southwest District I Plan update 1.8% I am a public official in Iowa City 0.0% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q2: What kinds of development would you like to see as this area grows? (select all that apply) Answered: 162 1 Skipped: 6 Parks and outdoor recreational areas 87.7% Housing for small families 53.7% Small-scale commercial services (such as stores, 41.4% restaurants, offices, etc.) Housing for large families 41.4% Educational facilities (such as childcare services, schools, etc.) 38.3% Indoor recreational facilities 33.3% Housing for seniors 33.3% Public facilities (such as facilities providing fire or police protection, etc.) 30.3% Small-scale health services (such as clinics, dentists, etc.) 26.5% Housing for individual persons 22.2% Housing for young adults 17.9% Facilities for public assembly (such as community centers, churches, mosques, etc.) 15.4% Other (please specify) 11.7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q3: What opportunities do you see for future development in this area? (select all that apply) Answered: 156 I Skipped: 12 A neighborhood that provides amenities such as parks and open space A neighborhood that is safe for children to walk, such as to school or a friend's house A neighborhood that is safe and easy to bike in with trails and other amenities A neighborhood that preserves and celebrates the natural environment and features like woods, streams, wetlands,... A neighborhood that promotes a healthy and sustainable lifestyle Housing that is energy efficient and environmentally friendly A neighborhood that has well-connected streets with multiple route options to other areas of town An equitable neighborhood that welcomes people from all backgrounds and incomes A neighborhood that is well-connected with transit to other areas of town A neighborhood that welcomes people at all stages of life with a mix of housing types (single-family homes,... A neighborhood that provides a variety of transportation choices A neighborhood that celebrates and protects culturally significant people, places, and events Housing that is accessible for seniors or persons with disabilities 40.4% ■ 35.3% ■ 34.6% 32.1% 28.2% 26.3% 26.3% Housing that is affordable for first-time homebuyers 25.6% Other (please specify) 10.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 57.7% 50.0% 72.4% 71.2% 70.5% 69.2% 3 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q4: What concerns do you have for future development in this area? (select all that apply) Answered: 161 1 Skipped: 7 Development that is too dense (i.e. buildings are too close together) Lack of road capacity on Rohret Road Lack of green space in new development Increased traffic on neighborhood streets Loss of open space High traffic speeds Loss of agricultural land Lack of road capacity on Highway 1 Lack of access to transit Lack of adequate public services Other (please specify) 10.6% Development that is not dense enough (i.e. buildings are too spread apart) 9.9% 23.0% 20.5% 20.5% 37.9% 36.7% 66.5% 63.4% 63.4% 62.7% 59.0% Distance from jobs 8.1% Distance from commercial uses 7.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 4 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q5: If you selected more than one kind of development on the previous page that you think is important for the area as it grows, please rank them by priority with 1 being most important. Answered: 132 I Skipped: 36 Parks and outdoor recreational areas Housing for small families Housing for large families Small-scale commercial services (such as stores, restaurants, offices, etc.) Educational facilities (such as childcare services, schools, etc.) Housing for seniors Indoor recreational facilities Public facilities (such as facilities providing fire or police protection, etc.) Small-scale health services (such as clinics, dentists, etc.) Housing for individual persons Housing for young adults Facilities for public assembly (such as community centers, churches, mosques, etc.) Other •Top 3 Middle • Bottom 3 a_ 0 5 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix 50 100 Number of Responses 150 Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q6: If you selected more than one opportunity for future development on the previous page that you think is important in this area, please rank them by priority with 1 being the greatest opportunity. Answered: 125 I Skipped: 43 A neighborhood that provides amenities such as parks and open space A neighborhood that preserves and celebrates the natural environment and features like woods, streams,... A neighborhood that is safe for children to walk, such as to school or a friend's house A neighborhood that is safe and easy to bike in with trails and other amenities A neighborhood that promotes a healthy and sustainable lifestyle Housing that is energy efficient and environmentally friendly A neighborhood that has well-connected streets with multiple route options to other areas of town A neighborhood that is well-connected with transit to other areas of town An equitable neighborhood that welcomes people from all backgrounds and incomes A neighborhood that welcomes people at all stages of life with a mix of housing types (single-family homes,... A neighborhood that provides a variety of transportation choices A neighborhood that celebrates and protects culturally significant people, places, and events Housing that is accessible for seniors or persons with disabilities Housing that is affordable for first-time homebuyers Other IN Top 3 Middle • Bottom 3 M 1 I 0 20 40 60 80 100 Number of Responses 6 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q7: If you selected more than one concern regarding future development in the area on the previous page, please rank them by priority with 1 being your largest concern. Answered: 138 I Skipped: 30 Development that is too dense (i.e. buildings are too close together) Lack of road capacity on Rohret Road Increased traffic on neighborhood streets Lack of green space in new development Loss of open space High traffic speeds Loss of agricultural land Lack of road capacity on Highway 1 Lack of adequate public services Lack of access to transit Development that is not dense enough (i.e. buildings are too spread apart) Other Distance from commercial uses Distance from jobs ■ Top 3 Middle ■ Bottom 3 I I II 0 20 40 60 80 100 Number of Responses Q8: If you have other thoughts, ideas, or additional information to share that the City should consider during this plan update, please let us know below: Answered: 62 I Skipped: 106 Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix 7 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q9: If you would like to receive future updates on this project, sign up for the contact list below (your information will remain confidential and will only be used for this project): Answered: 100 I Skipped: 68 Q10: Where do you live? Answered: 146 I Skipped: 22 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 84.3% In Iowa City 10.3% 4.1% 1.4% In another city in Johnson Outside city limits in Johnson Outside Johnson County County County Q11: What is the zip code of your home address? Answered: 142 I Skipped: 26 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 9.2% 2.1% 2.1% 52241 52245 85.2% 52246 0.7% 0.7% 52333 55317 Q12: How would you describe your living situation? Answered: 145 I Skipped: 23 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 93.8% Live in a home owned by you or someone in your household 4.8% 1.4% Live in a home rented by you or Other (please specify) someone in your household 8 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q13: How many people currently live in your household? (include all persons living in your dwelling)? Answered: 144 I Skipped: 24 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 5.6% Mit 31.9% 12.5% • 3 29.9% A 11.8% 5 5.6% Q14: How many children (under 18 years) currently live in your household? Answered: 142 I Skipped: 26 45% 42.3% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 11.3% 28.2% 9.9% 5.6% 2.1% 2.1% 0.7% 7 8 0.7% 2 5 6 Q15: Where do you work or go to school? Answered: 146 I Skipped: 22 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 71.2% In Iowa City 9.6% 0.0% 6.2% 13.0% In another city in Outside city limits in Outside Johnson Not currently working Johnson County Johnson County County or going to school (retired, between jobs, etc.) 9 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q16: What is the zip code of your current work or school address? Answered: 121 1 Skipped: 47 40% 35% 33.9% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 28.1% 14.9% 8.3% III 3.3% 1.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% III mom 522425224652240522415224552402522285223552243523195234052404524055249852556553175590560603 Q17: What is your age? Answered: 135 1 Skipped/Preferred not to answer: 33 35% 32.6% 30% 25% 20% 15% 12.6% 10% 5% 0% 0.0% 0.7% 23.0% 19.3% 8.9% 3.0% <18 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ Q18: With which gender do you most identify? Answered: 129 1 Skipped/Preferred not to answer: 39 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 48.1% Male 51.9% 0.0% 0.0% Female Non-Binary/Non-Conforming Not Listed (please specify) 10 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q19: Are you of Hispanic, Latino, or of Spanish origin? Answered: 117 I Skipped/Preferred not to answer: 51 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2.6% 97.4% Yes No Q20: What is your race? (select all that apply) Answered: 112 I Skipped/Preferred not to answer: 56 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 87.5% White 2.7% 1.8% 10.7% 1.8% Black or African American Indian or American Alaska Native Asian or Pacific Some other race Islander (please specify) Q21: What was the total combined income for all persons living in your dwelling in the past 12 months? Answered: 104 I Skipped/Preferred not to answer: 64 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 5.8% 0.0% 0.0% 14.4% 12.5% 27.9% 20.2% 19.2% Less than $15,000 to $25,000 to $50,000 to $75,000 to $100,000 to $150,000 to $200,000 or $15,000 $24,999 $49,999 $74,999 $99,999 $149,999 $199,999 more Q22: Are you currently enrolled at an institution of higher education? (for example, University of Iowa, Kirkwood Community College, etc.) Answered: 132 I Skipped: 36 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 6.8% 93.2% Yes No 11 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 APPENDIX: FULL QUALITATIVE ANSWERS Q1: "Other" Responses Children attend nearby school I live on Hunters Run, close to the area In the neighborhood. I live in Coralville and my husband and I are looking to move to Iowa City. I live by it. mms Ty'n Cae Nieghborhood President Curently live out of state but family owns land impacted by the plan. I am an employee ofJohnson County Planning Q2: "Other" Responses additional connecting streets/roads to Melrose Avenue Low income housing for poorer residents and university students. very low density residential development I prefer it as it is. Traffic is already heavy on Rohret and the quality of the road is exceptionally poor. None -no development needed DO NOTHING Public Hunting Area This is a valuable area with abundant water and other natural resources. It should be left as a nature reserve. Single family homes only! public pool and tennis courts, maybe even a par 3 golf course with kids activities None Large scale commercial such as IKEA, Hy Vee, Whole Foods. Not interested in seeing this area developed. Single family homes Very dependent on specific areas within plan update No development No more development that requires the loss of farmland and cutting down of trees do nothing with it the Rohret road would need some serious repairs Q3: "Other" Responses this is a weird list - who's going to say no to any of these? additional streets to Melrose Dedicated bike paths that are safe and segregated from car lanes. A quiet neighborhood where people's right to peace in their own homes, on their own schedules, is respected as much as people's right to recreate. 12 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Leave it as is Wild -life Game Area with wetlands and public use Same building requirements, costs, min building sq ft, No low cost housing to bring property values down! Connect Rohret to Melrose directly on the West side NO bike lanes. Please. a focus on neighborhood schools for building community and coordinating recreation and activities None mixed -use & sustainable, walkable, transit -served, pls Bringing more traffic to our peaceful neighborhood is not desired. No development An area that maintains it's rural heritage More stressed resources our water presser is next to nothing now and Rohret road is like a washboard fix the streets we have now. Q4: "Other" Responses Terrible planning with plastic barracks subdivision houses like we have everywhere else on this side of town Commercial buildings( ie gas stations) that hinders the beauty of area. Also the speed limit is too high and traffic drives 50 mph on Rohret in the evening. Traffic is very heavy during in morning and evening due to limited streets and only one street to get over across 1-218. We can barely get out onto Rohret in the morning. It is unacceptable to put more housing in until this is remedied. Increasing urban sprawl which makes public transportation more costly. Further development of suburbs which encroach on agricultural land and dig the city into greater debt in the near future. Ugliness, kit buildings that don't account for continental -climate temperature swings and insulation needs, giant houses, deathtrap parking lots where sight lines are bad (like Walden Square), absence of bike lanes separated physically from car paths, minivan caravans waiting to make a left onto Rohret twice a day (build the road -separated bike paths in now) Loss of animal habitat The small crime area near Heartig drug creating a dangerous atmosphere that could turn the area bad. The lack of space at the elementary school for such expansion Lack of access on Morman Trek with Road Diet! Adding bike lanes that would further congest traffic lack of public community amenities lack of accessible housing for lower income or diverse family groups no more mcmansions Low affordability and use of exclusionary restrictive covenants (e.g., lot size, # of garages) Overcrowding in schools- having to redistrict the boundaries again Commercial uses of land The potential cost of the homes when all is said and done... Loss of natural land and native Iowa species in the area 13 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Q8: If you have other thoughts, ideas, or additional information to share that the City should consider during this plan update, please let us know below: The guy applying for subdivision approval is the same guy who destroyed the area across from the Co- op and City Hall, and has had similar problems elsewhere. Steer him very hard on design if you're approving his plans, because otherwise it'll be soulless and horrible and we'll have to live with it forever while he waltzes off with a lot of money in his pocket. I think the existing area of north of Rohret Road has been ignored. The city refuses to acknowledge and address the high traffic to and from Weber Elementary School and the high number of cars that travel on Rohret Road as it is the ONLY access people have to Mormon Trek and crossing the interstate. You CAN NOT add additional housing without fixing this. Also, older property owners on the south side of Rohret do not maintain their property and make the area look trashy. There should also be a fire station on Mormon Trek to have faster access to these neighborhoods across the interstate. In addition, the speed limit of 35 mph is too high in the areas of Rohret before and especially further west of the school. There are many that use Rohret from the countryside west of the city limits that travel at very high speeds with no regard for present neighborhoods. Also, Rohret Road has been ruined by cement trucks, semi truck, dump trucks and other large construction equipment that travel and speeds greater than 35 mph to their construction sites. This occurs all day long many days of the week. I ask for diversity of housing and transportation options, and for a housing policy that encourages an abundance of housing. Developing out instead of in leads to real estate bubbles. Because the DOT pays for paving new roads the city thinks that they'll make nothing but profit when building new homes on these streets through taxes. However once these streets become the responsibility of the city to maintain these profits quickly become a net loss and in order to keep an influx of revenue, the city must keep expanding. But this will always lead to an inevitable crash. The only thing that prevents this from happening is a federal bailout. This is a forseeable and avoidable problem that will not only prevent the city from crumbling but change it into a beacon for the future of our changing climate in the U.S. Access this area should not be off Rohret Rd but from Mormon Trek and Melrose Try to find some middle ground between current SW district and pennisula neighborhood Slothhower Road improvement? Poor Farm development Hwy 1 improvement or parallel auxilary road Rohret road needs to be connected to Melrose Ave. where the current Slothower Rd. is. This would shave several minutes off people's drive from the existing and proposed new developments to points north. Currently, people have to weave through neighborhoods east of the highway, which is not safe. This area also needs more neighborhood retail (restaurants, supermarkets). My opinion is that this area should not be developed for city use and should remain agricultural. There are other areas around the city that will be much easier less costly to develop The destruction of green space in Iowa City and Coralville is troubling to me, as is the thought of massive development near my home. I doubt my thoughts will do anything to halt what is probably already a fait accompli. I'm sure you've already got developers salivating at the opportunity. Myself and many neighbors enjoy seeing the wildlife nearby & do not want to have any more development in this area. The infrastructure is not there to support an new neighborhood/development in this area. 911 response would be stressed and/or decreased There is only one way in and out of any neighborhood west of Shannon Drive 14 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 Iowa City has incentivized the overbuilding of apartments. Iowa City does not need more apartments or condominiums for young people. There are already too many empty apartments. The city already destroyed a lake to build a Menards a mile from an old Menards. Further destruction of the natural beauty of this area would disgust me; use land that is already in the sphere of influence of Iowa City and stop expanding urban areas. If Iowa City claims to be a progressive and green city, it will reconsider the annexation of this land. Weber Elementary has become one of the highest capacity schools in the district. The school district would have to do new boundaries for the west side of Iowa city if this turns into a housing development. I would like to acknowledge that Weber Elementary is already crowded with very large class sizes and not enough resources to meet the needs of our diverse population. I would like any increase in student enrollment to be addressed. I want to maintain the diversity at Weber Elementary while bringing class sizes down and having appropriate staffing to meet student needs. I would also love to see easier access to Coralville from the neighborhood but with much though and consideration to the effects on current residents and traffic patterns/flow. stop sprawl I cannot stress how worried I am as a prospect buyer to the area and a worker about the crime area near Heartig. Coffee shop in a park Making Slothower Road a through street would go a long way to helping reduce traffic congestion on Mormon Trek, Highway 1, and Shannon Drive. It would also significantly reduce travel times to 218, I- 80, and Coralville. I think this is the single most important improvement for this area and should be considered essential prior to any additional development. If we allow more construction in South Rohret, the traffic in the Rohret-Mormon Trek crossing would be terrible. With the substantial size and land available, an additional school(s) should be included as part of the development. Weber is already very large and will likely reach capacity in near future. Have another elementary school would be ideal. Thank you for letting us be involved. This area very susceptible to soil erosion with light soils and steep slopes making it undesirable for extensive development. A high priority should be given to maintaining these areas as natural as possible, such as wetlands, prairie and woodlands Make Morman Trek 4 lanes! NO Low income housing! Would rather not see high density housing. Loss of open area is concerning as there are no parks west of the highway. Increased traffic is worrisome. Please connect Rohret road to Highway 1 and to Melrose Avenue with roads that do not have speed bumps or stop lights. More development out Rohret road needs more access from roads other than Rohret rd. If Rohret were widened it would further divide the neighborhood from the neighborhood and Weber Elementary, on the north side of Rohret Rd. Dog park and a pool. This part of town is under -served with parks and trails. Not a good space for commercial development given the limited vehicle access and low capacity level for Rohert. This area with more growth NEEDS a better connection to main roads. There is so much traffic from Rohret up through Shannon Drive and on to Melrose. Need a better connection to Melrose from the west side. We recently moved to this area after living 48 years in SE Iowa City. The reason we moved was because of increased crime, and decreasing property values due to rental property and lack of police 15 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 presence. We do not want to see that happen in this area so proper planning and development is extremely important. It would be nice to focus on community activities public and commercial. For example Colonial Lanes is in that area, but it really needs a boost - I wouldn't want to see it go out of business with a new bowling alley, but we need it to improve for families and communities. How can the development in this area improve and build upon some of what's already there/nearby Avoiding "streets of nothing to nowhere" is good for getting people to use feet, breaks up monitony. Owen has it right in Green Metropolis. Also pls require thicker walls, 2x4 studs not adequate for insulation. The rolling hills of the farm directly south of Rohret and directly west of the 218 would be the greatest loss for the area if developed into condos, apartments, or even houses. I would prioritize this as green space or parkland (or retaining it as farmland). Having lived in this area for 26 years, I am concerned about the environmental impact developmental will have on the spring -fed lake and all the deer, pheasants, birds and other animals that live here. I am concerned about the increased traffic on our road given the hills and history of speeding that makes for a dangerous combination. Need to diversify housing options and price in the expansion. Don't want this to increase or maintain existing levels of housing segregation (by income, race, age, etc.) on the west side. As the area grows, an elementary school adjacent (perhaps accross Rohret Rd) to Weber would allow more flexibility and efficiency for the district and should be considered. One building could be PK-3 for instance and one building 4-6. This could change year to year as class sizes fluctuate. It would be really nice to have at least a small commercial area for coffee shop/restaurant/pharmacy etc. that blends in well with the neighborhood. The Fareway complex is a little to far to be easily walkable for most of the Weber neighborhood. Tremendous potential! Would be wonderful to expand on this direction as opposed to continue toward the landfill. One concern would be roads, traffic, accessibility. Would help to add connecting road from the west end of Rohret. Alleviate the one way in/out traffic. BIGGEST CONCERN IS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Weber is already over capacity and suffering from being under resourced with the level of student need. School expansion at this point would be impractical and unsafe, especially with exposure concerns that are likely to continue. Another west end elementary would allow for continued residential development while alleviating some of Weber's overcrowding. Plus increase walk -ability for many of the students. This area needs greater access adjacent main roads such as Highway 1 and Melrose Ave. Emergency services for the proposed add on area. Please add commercial businesses zoning to area, such as convenient/gas store, grocery, office building, mini mall, and so on. We could also use road access to Slothower Road. Would like to see Slothower Rd paved, and extended to connect Melrose Ave. to Hwy 1. Need street connection with Melrose Ave. for area north of Rohret and west of 218 -- via expanded Slothower St. or northbound extension of Wild Prairie Dr. Additional access road from Mormon Trek to the area to be developed other than Hwy 1 and Rohret Rd. Proposed path of connection between Hwy 965 at the Lowe's intersection in Coralville on to Melrose, and then again to Hwy 1. Where that road goes will set the stage for completing a "square" around the whole area from an access standpoint. Depending on square mileage, might be room for an elementary school in addition to Weber. Also, would like to know what the future of Meyer Rd at the border of Rohret Rd and current city limits. Focus on prairie and wetland restoration; traffic speed control (speed bumps) on neighborhood roads; dog park 16 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Southwest District, Rohret South Survey July 13, 2022 I would just love to see a large outdoor park, with hiking and biking trails. No homes or stores. Please don't add any commercial properties. Please don't include ramps on or off of Rohret to hwy 218. Would like a nice park with open space to play and take walks. You should send a survey asking about improving and extending Slothtower Rd from Rohret Rd to Melrose Ave. I think most people would be in favor of this development. The families on Kitty Lee road are concerned that their neighborhood will be connected to a larger neighborhood or businesses, therefore causing there to be more traffic in this currently quiet and private neighborhood. Please consider that they value their home and neighborhood for this reason, it's why they chose to live their. The same goes for the other "country" homes and subdivisions in this area. Please don't develop this. For those of us that live west of 218, it would be great if there was an easier way to access 218 going North. If Slothower went through from Rohret to Melrose it would help out a lot. Iowa City Please make sure to include the park, lake, and walking trails from the original plan. Rohret Rd is already quite congested at certain times of the day. Most people turn right off of Rohret when heading west, which helps, but I'm concerned about traffic back-ups if a lot more people are turning left into the area south of Rohret. The Rohret area already has tons of housing. Would be good to break it up a bit with some parks, clinics or stores. Not sure how much space there is to have more kids attend Weber, so maybe senior housing is best option. The development should be similar to what is already in this area. Please don't connect this development, if approved, to Kitty Lee Road. Connecting all west side to melrose with a main road that doesn't go through neighborhoods I have concerns about the safety in the neighborhood when the future development is too dense. A new elementary school is a must if any land is going to be developed for residential purposes. I would love to see small, local businesses join the neighborhood! An ice cream shop tops my list. consider the interface with Highway 1 as another opportunity to provide commercial development utilizing existing infrastructure, and also to allow transition off the highway into more residential uses to the north. This will also be important as the plan considers developing up to - and possibly incorporating - the existing intensive commercial uses on the south side of the Highway just west of Sharon Center Rd. Q12: "Other" Responses Rent a home. Apartment Q20: "Other" Responses Mexican Multiple 17 Note: Qualitative answers are available in the Appendix Attachment 4 Southwest District Plan Update Stakeholder Meeting Summary CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY Qk LI I ERA I URE This document summarizes public input heard throughout focus group and technical committee meetings held in December 2020 through January 2021 for the South Rohret Subarea update to the Southwest District Plan. In total, 46 stakeholders were engaged, as shown below in Table 1. The document includes overarching themes heard throughout focus group meetings, and a summary of comments which provides additional details and specific thoughts and concerns. A questionnaire is available online as a forum for broader public input. As of January 14, 2021, 130 responses have been received. A summary of those results will be provided when the survey closes. The questionnaire is currently available on the project website at www.icgov.org/sw-plan-update. Questions can be directed to Kirk Lehmann, Associate Planner, at kirk-lehmann@iowa-city.org. Table 1: Focus Group Meetings and Attendance Group Date Time Attending City -Wide Stakeholders December 15, 2020 10:30 am 5 Area Organization Stakeholders December 15, 2020 1:30 pm 4 Owners December 15, 2020 3:00 pm 3 Owners December 15, 2020 4:00 pm 1 Owners December 16, 2020 1:30 pm 2 Iowa City Community School District December 17, 2020 3:00 pm 3 Development Community December 22, 2020 10:30 am 9 Development Community January 6, 2021 9:30 am 4 Parks & Recreation Commission January 13, 2021 5:00 pm 7 Technical Committee Ongoing 8 Total 46 Meetings included representatives from: Neighborhood Associations (Tyne Cae & Country Club Estates), Johnson County (Planning/Development/Sustainability & Poor Farm), ICCSD, ICAAR, HBA, Owners (including Oaknoll), Affordable Housing Coalition, City of Iowa City (Climate Action Commission, Parks and Rec Commission, NDS, PW, MPO, ICFD) OVERARCHING THEMES: Several recurring themes were heard throughout the focus group meetings. They included: • Access and Connectivity. The westernmost portion of the Southwest District has limited access to the City across Highway 218, specifically at Rohret Road, Highway 1, and Melrose Avenue. North/south connectivity between these roads is essential to future development in this area. • Traffic Concerns. Rohret Road is the current primary street to access existing development west of US-218. It experiences some congestion during peak traffic hours. Future development may require improvements to Rohret Road, Highway 1, and/or routes between them to address congestion, especially at choke points like Weber Elementary. Adequate transit access, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, can also help reduce congestion. • Building a New Neighborhood. The area is desirable for a mix of housing types and price points due to potential access to amenities like parks, new schools, and trails, and due to proximity to the University as a large employment center. This provides unique future opportunities for development, such as clustered residences or "agri-hoods". 1 • Regional Amenities and Trails. Stakeholders are supportive of a regional stormwater management system surrounded by park space. It would function as a neighborhood and city- wide amenity, provide a new attraction to this part of town, and preserve existing habitat. Trails should surround the park and connect to other areas of the City. • Importance of Public Services. With the potential for new development, fire protection and additional schools must be planned. As development progresses west, sewers may become a limiting factor for development, largely due to topographic constraints. • Neighborhood Commercial. Commercial development on Rohret Road and Highway 1 could serve the neighborhood, though commercial areas would likely need to be small in size and targeted in scope, with appropriate transitions to residential neighborhoods. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS Comments from all meetings are organized and consolidated by topic below. As a summary, it does not include every comment made during these meetings. Road Access • The Southwest District has limited access from the west due to Highway 218, with Rohret Road being the primary connection for most existing development. Highway 1 provides access for some limited existing development as well. • While physically close, it takes a while to travel to destinations, which can make the area harder to market and/or develop. • North/south road connections between Rohret Rd, Melrose Ave, and Highway 1 are essential, and making those connections are as important as the trunk sewer being extended under Highway 218. Slothower Road is a good candidate to connect Rohret to Melrose. • A direct route to Coralville along the planned 965 extension will encourage development, though the plan should not be contingent on it because it will not occur for a long time. • Kennedy Parkway crossing 218 would also provide an additional route for traffic. Traffic Concerns • Traffic for development on Rohret Rd is manageable, but it takes time to cross US-218. Traffic can bottleneck at Weber Elementary during school drop off and especially pick up when everyone arrives at the same time; the school district is trying to mitigate this by utilizing side streets and encouraging walking. Turn lanes on Rohret by Weber may increase safety and reduce traffic congestion • There are concerns about development affecting traffic on Benton Street. • It can be challenging to get on Highway 1 at uncontrolled access points from 7 am — 9 am and 3:30 pm — 5 pm due to traffic; in the future, it will likely need stoplights and possibly turning lanes. Active Transportation • Access to sidewalks, trails, and parks have become increasingly important with COVID. • Trails and bicycle infrastructure could be an asset for the area to attract residents and promote walking. Trails should connect to adjacent parks and other areas of the City. • As development occurs south of Rohret Rd, safe crossings to Weber Elementary should be considered, such as an underground pathway. The need may decrease depending on the location of future schools, the growth of the area, and catchment areas. 2 Transit • Transit is an important source of transportation and should be extended as this area grows. • Changes to transit service has resulted in some areas in the Southwest District experiencing reduced access. Further possible service reductions are a concern, including the Melrose Express that runs to the Poor Farm. • Transit should be considered an essential service for this area as it will help reduce reliance on personal automobiles and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Public Services • The sewer extension under Highway 218, currently planned for 2023, is needed for urban -scale development; as such, development will likely follow the sewer line. • Fire protection primarily depends on access and ability to respond. It will become more important as the area grows, so a future fire station should be considered west of US-218, either on Highway 1 or Rohret. • Enrollment at Weber may reach capacity in 1-2 years. Given the amount of potential growth west of Highway 218, 2 additional elementary schools and possibly a junior high should be considered (15-18 acres for the elementary site and 50-60 acres for the elementary/junior high site). • The City should consider Green infrastructure, like the Sycamore Greenway in the South District. Housing and Neighborhoods • People want to live in this area (and send kids to West High), but housing is not always available; this indicates a large demand for housing. A neighborhood close to outdoor recreation is great, which along with new schools, scenic rolling hills, and proximity to the University will drive demand in this area. COVID has increased the desire for housing with good access to trails, nature, and other recreational opportunities (such as fishing, birding, hiking, and biking). • There are currently only single-family homes west of Highway 218 A diversity of housing types and price points with more density should be considered. The City should strive to maintain Weber at its current free and reduced lunch rates. • There may be an opportunity for alternative developments which can promote affordability. May be able to develop micro or pocket neighborhoods it is difficult to place streets. May be able to develop agri-hoods with small lots around a common ag-related space. • Affordability is important because nothing will be built if people can't afford it, even with low interest rates; if it costs more to develop (such as through required alleys or longer, more complicated review processes), homes become less affordable. • The affordable housing requirement should be clarified and implemented at the time of annexation rather than later in the development process; staff should take a more active role in deciding if housing should be onsite or paid as a fee in lieu of units. • Equity is one of the most important considerations for sustainable development, and there are also opportunities to use green construction technique on larger buildings. Commercial Development • Commercial developments would be nice for residents in this area to avoid crossing US-218. o Businesses searching for space typically ask for high traffic counts and turning movements; Rohret Rd and Highway 1 are the two most likely locations. o Businesses often need more than the local neighborhood for support, though there is some opportunity for targeted commercial with limited square footage. 3 Lower demand means lower prices, so buildings must be thoughtful of the end user. • For commercial development on Rohret Rd, there is good visibility but limited access. Could support local services/offices but may be difficult to attract big businesses. Commercial will be more attractive with north/south routes to Melrose and Highway 1. • Commercial uses may be more successful on Highway 1 near other existing commercial. There is existing intensive commercial development in unincorporated Johnson County on Highway 1, near Sharon Center Rd; if that use expands, it will likely be for flex space or other intensive commercial uses rather than neighborhood commercial uses. Will need to carefully transition between commercial areas and residential areas. • In denser markets, COVID is increasing commercial vacancies due to new online demand and telecommuting options. It may affect office space, but attendees don't believe it will impact Iowa City as much. There may be some demand to convert vacant commercial space into residential units outside of the South Rohret Subarea, but many realtors are currently experiencing high demand. Parks, Open Space, and Stormwater Management • There is a need for a recreation center on this side of town, with space for indoor sports and aquatics, and possibly outdoor recreational uses. • Flash flooding affects neighbors east of 218 after the stream crosses under Mormon Trek; improvements upstream can affect that negatively (through construction of impervious surfaces) and positively (through thoughtful stormwater management) • Green infrastructure like the regional stormwater lake in the 2002 plan would be great. Something like Terry Trueblood is more advantageous as a selling point compared to multiple "puddles" in subdivision -level stormwater systems. It could provide biking, hiking, and birding opportunities and preserve the natural landscape, including any native prairies and bird habitats • A regional lake concept depends on the City to take ownership, in addition to landowners. Impact or development fees should offset losses for landowners that cannot develop, but the City should meet with stakeholders to determine the best approach. City should own the stormwater basin and promote it as a recreational area. • The Johnson County Poor Farm is another nearby unique amenity that plans on becoming more integrated with neighborhoods to the south. They have plans for trail connections to the south and some affordable housing. They would like to host more activities and events (festivals, bike rides, summer series, movies, etc.) and provide a different venue than downtown. • The University has lots of nearby outdoor recreational space; the City should enhance connections for residents and strive to avoid duplication of services where possible. Other Development Considerations • There are lots of steep hills, so creative roadway design is needed, though not a concern. • Topography could be a challenge for sewer lines because the cost of lift stations may limit some developments due to their expense (such as in the southwest part of the subarea). • Where constructed, lift stations will require a certain level of density to support the cost. • Form -based development standards are being considered for the area to promote affordability, density, and livability regardless of age or ability. 4 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 16, 2022 —6:00 PM — FORMAL MEETING EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL FINAL MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Craig, Maggie Elliott, Mike Hensch, Billie Townsend MEMBERS ABSENT: Maria Padron, Mark Signs, Chad Wade STAFF PRESENT: Sue Dulek, Kirk Lehmann, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: By a vote of 4-0 the Commission continued the public hearing and deferred the item on a proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to update the Southwest District Plan, including background information and the future land use map for the Rohret South Subarea to the December 7, 2022 meeting. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. CPA22-0002: A public hearing on a proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to update the Southwest District Plan, including background information and the future land use map for the Rohret South Subarea. Hensch opened the public hearing. Russett stated staff is requesting that the Commission defer this item to the next meeting as the zoning code requires a minimum of four votes to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Russett noted since there are only four members of the Commission present tonight and consideration of a Comprehensive Plan amendment is arguably one of the most important roles of the Planning and Zoning Commission staff is requesting a deferral. If the Commission decides to move forward with the item tonight, and ultimately ends up deferring the item to a future meeting date, the City Attorney's Office will need to evaluate whether or not additional Commission members would able to participate in future discussions since those Commission members are not present tonight and wouldn't hear the staff report, testimony from the public and any Commission discussion. So again, staff is asking that the Commission defer this item to December 7. Hensch noted being that they'd want other Commissioners to be here and since Commissioner Craig will not be here in December, that would leave just three and three people cannot vote on a Comprehensive Plan amendment so it would seem logical to defer the public hearing and the Planning and Zoning Commission November 16, 2022 Page 2 of 3 vote to a future date as recommended by staff. Elliott moved to continue the public hearing and defer this item to the December 7, 2022 meeting. Craig seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-0. PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Russett noted one item was approved this week by City Council, it was the local landmark rezoning for the house on East Davenport Street. Townsend noted she heard that there was $93 million in affordable funds that's going to go back to the government because the state of Iowa didn't spend it. Russett acknowledged she read an article on that and it's her understanding it is the Iowa Finance Authority, so she doesn't really have any information on that. Townsend noted Iowa City needs affordable housing, or at least rent subsidies in the area so is there anything that City Council can do. Dulek noted staff can provide the Commission with that information, and then they can take it to City councilor if they'd like. ADJOURNMENT: Townsend moved to adjourn. Craig seconded. A vote was taken and the motion passed 4-0. MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 7, 2022 — 6:00 PM — FORMAL MEETING EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL PRELIMINARY MEMBERS PRESENT: Maggie Elliott, Mike Hensch, Maria Padron, Mark Signs, Billie Townsend, Chad Wade MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Susan Craig Sarah Hektoen, Kirk Lehmann, Anne Russett Mark Alatalo, Barb Halm, Dan Black, Maria Story, Victoria Concha, Kris Sehr, Jill Tentinger, Kelsey Sehr RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of CPA22-0002, a proposed amendment to the Southwest District Plan to update background information and the section on the Rohret South Subarea, as proposed in Attachment 1. By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends that Title 14 Zoning and Title 15 Land Subdivision be amended as illustrated in Attachment 1 to enhance land use regulations related to solar energy systems and to further implement the City's goals related to climate action. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. CPA22-0002 (continued from 11/16/22): A public hearing on a proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to update the Southwest District Plan, including background information and the future land use map for the Rohret South Subarea. Hensch continued the public hearing from the November 16 meeting. Lehmann began the staff report with background on comprehensive planning and how it all fits together. Iowa City has a Comprehensive Plan, IC 2030, which provides a roadmap for the future of Iowa City and as part of that there are 10 planning districts for specific areas of the City. One of those is the Southwest District Plan, which was adopted in 2002. The Southwest Planning District is bounded by Melrose on the north, Highway One on the south, the Iowa River on the east and then the growth area on the west. The reason the City is looking at this area specifically is the plan is to extend sewer service under Highway 218 in 2023 to allow urban development in the Rohret South subarea of this District which is the Southwest quadrant of the Southwest District. Lehmann explained right now this area is largely agricultural because it hasn't had sewer service and therefore couldn't be developed at an urban scale. But the City is anticipating once sewers are put in then development will follow. The proposed amendments are looking Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 2 of 25 specifically at that and updating background information, primarily because the Plan was adopted 20 years ago and lots of things have changed. The Amendments are also reimagining the future land use of the subarea, which includes looking at incorporating form -based land use categories. In terms of this subarea, Lehmann noted not all of it is annexed in the City, most of it is in unincorporated Johnson County. He explained annexation is a voluntary process but the City would expect in the future that it would annex. In terms of the total area of the subarea, it's larger than 1800 acres. Additionally, the process that staff has done for this has been pretty lengthy compared to a lot of planning processes that they do. They initially started looking at this area in winter of 2020, they started looking at the background information and looking at things that needed to be updated. They also started the initial public outreach at that time which involved sending out a survey to property owners and folks that live within the area as well as stakeholders. The survey had 168 participants and the results from that are included in the agenda packet. Staff also had a number of focus group meetings with landowners, developers, neighbors' groups in the area and with other groups that might have interests in this area in the future, just to get some baseline feedback such as what they like about the area, what they don't like about the area, and what opportunities to they see for the area. This data collection concluded around April 2021 but staff did not start looking at the area again until January of 2022 primarily because at that time there was an annexation of approximately 200 acres, the area where sewer would be brought under Highway 218, and that annexation was deferred indefinitely by City Council, so the applicant withdrew their application at that time and went to the County. So there was a time period where staff wasn't quite sure what was going to happen with that land and paused until they had more guidance from Council. Around January of 2022 is when staff started to develop the concept for the Rohret South subarea, they worked with Optic Design who helped do the form -based code in the South District Plan to develop the framework and then staff fleshed it out in more detail, including the final land use categories, and the final thoroughfare types in the future land use map. Once staff had a working map that they could move forward with, they had a series of additional meetings including lots of conversations with landowners, they went to the party in the park event at Hunter's Run Park in the Southwest District where they got some general feedback and after that held a public open house on September 1 where they had 117 participants come and share feedback. Lehmann noted a lot of that feedback is included in the agenda packet, all the written documentation, as well as the interactive map that people were able to put stickers on for things that they like and don't like. So based on that feedback, staff revised the public draft, and completed revisions to the actual text of the Plan, which they posted on October 19. Staff revised it again in November and there have been some small revisions since then based on errors that have been noticed. Staff has also received correspondence throughout this time period and there are 13 messages that are included in the agenda packet. Staff also tried to make sure that folks were up to date and have a contact list that they've been sending out emails to and public notices were sent to property owners within the area. That contact list is approximately 230 folks. Lehmann explained this meeting is part of the adoption process phase, where they are still collecting public input, but this is the final stretch and staff has developed recommendations, which is what is before the Commission today. In terms of the feedback that staff has heard throughout this process, Lehmann stated there have been a number of recurring themes. One of the big ones is related to transportation issues. In this subarea, Highway 218 is a barrier between the Rohret South subarea and the rest of the Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 3 of 25 City. There are only two roads that go over Highway 218 into the subarea, Highway One to the south and Rohret Road to the north. There is also Melrose to the north of the subarea, but that's only three routes in the District. There's lots of concerns with sole access from Rohret Road, especially as there has been more development happening recently, and another concern is tied to Kitty Lee Road where there is existing development. There are several correspondences in the packet about that and about Kitty Lee Road becoming a through street regarding traffic and safety. Some other comments are tied to the opportunities for new neighborhoods within this area. They've heard a desire for a mix of housing types, but it should be consistent with existing development within the area. As part of those new neighborhoods, there's also been a big interest in creating neighborhood destinations, in some cases that may be commercial, and there's been a lot of emphasis on parks and open space and trails and preserving the beautiful rolling landscape that's out there. Additionally, there's lots of concerns about making sure that public services are available for the area, especially schools, since Weber Elementary is pretty much at max capacity, and emergency services as well. The final theme that came up a couple of times, especially in the public open house, was concerns about involuntary annexation and about what that may look like and how development occurs in the City in the future. Lehmann reiterated in terms of the proposed amendment, staff took all these things into account as they looked background information and revisited that section on the Rohret South subarea. He explained the changes to the background information for the most part are relatively minor and factual. For example, in the introduction, since this Plan was adopted in 2002, there's a new Comprehensive Plan update that was done in 2013, so making sure that's referenced, including a description of this update. Then there's the matter of updating maps throughout the Plan since the current land use map is 20 years old, the subarea maps are old, and ensuring that they incorporate the fringe areas that are currently in effect as of 2022. The maps also need updating to show roads that have been completed like McCollister Boulevard and Camp Cardinal Boulevard, which have a significant impact on the area. Other items are things like Roosevelt school, which is closed, new developments that have occurred, and redevelopment within the Riverfront Crossings area. Again, there's a number of changes that have happened and this is just making sure that those are reflected in the planning document. Lehmann noted they did not change the planning principles from the original plan, but they did add a reference to IC 2030. They also removed a reference to the Carson Lake concept plan, which was in the old Rohret South subarea. Lehmann noted there are some other subareas in this planning district but staff did not touch those sections. Lehmann showed an example of the old current land use map, noting there used to be areas that were undeveloped east of Highway 218 and that's not the case anymore. He also pointed out some areas at the far west and north of Rohret Road that have been developed since that time. Staff updated the map to ensure that it is current and accurate and also to ensure that it includes the new fringe area agreement boundaries as well. As far as updating the Rohret South subarea concept, he explained that is where the most substantive changes have been made. In some cases, it's retained many aspects of the current plan with things like retaining the concept of a stormwater lake and park in the northeast portion of the subarea, it's still largely residential in nature with some neighborhood commercial uses and retains the existing planning goals. However, Lehmann stated there are quite a few changes to the area, first it plans for the full subarea rather than having a section that is designated as Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 4 of 25 future urban development. In the past as folks have come in to develop within those areas, and the map is often not updated until it's happening ad hoc, so staff wanted to make sure that there was a concrete plan for the whole area. Staff also wanted to ensure that they meet the full growth area boundary that was adopted in 2021 so it reconfigures the location of some neighborhood centers and adds some additional ones to ensure that most folks are within walking distance to some sort of neighborhood center. Finally, the biggest change is that it uses form -based land use categories and as part of that it includes a thoroughfare map. Again, for the Rohret South subarea concept they're looking south or Rohret Road, west of Highway 218, and north of Highway One. Lehmann showed the 2002 future land use map for later comparison. He stressed that future land use maps are not a zoning code, they are just one way that shows how an area might develop. This area has the stormwater lake and a park in the center, surrounded largely by residential uses containing a mix of housing types. The new land use map still includes a neighborhood center in the northeast corner, so a lot of those things are maintained. However, there are some substantive differences in terms of the planning framework and the concepts that were used to develop the new future land use map. As far as residential uses, the planning framework includes ensuring that there's compact, orderly development, that development doesn't leapfrog to areas far outside of City boundaries, and that it's compact so that it preserves agricultural land until such a time as it is developed. Another goal is requiring a mix of housing types, which includes single family, duplex, townhomes, multifamily, all different housing types, and then also using form -based land use categories to ensure that there's appropriate transitions between existing areas and new areas and ensuring that there's an appropriate design and scale for new buildings within that, as well as high quality design. In terms of nonresidential uses, it includes neighborhood centers throughout that can help meet the needs of folks that live within the area and then also planning for high levels of public services, including schools and emergency services. In terms of transportation, they are wanting to ensure an interconnected street network with aligned streets that help ensure safety, and also that there's a range of transportation options available. Lehmann noted pedestrian linkages are provided throughout and also parks and open space providing amenities near neighborhoods. This would include a regional park, there's a proposal for a rec center and smaller area parks as well, in addition to preserving sensitive features and managing stormwater at a regional level, which helps allow the City use stormwater as an amenity that can benefit residents rather than just being there to manage stormwater. Next Lehmann wanted to discuss form -based land use. The concept of form -based land use is that instead of regulating areas by what the use is (i.e., residential, commercial, industrial) they regulate areas by what they want that area to be like. So instead of commercial, it would be a main street where not only is it tied to the uses that are allowed, but it's also tied to the streets that are there and to the frontages that are allowed, it's tied to the forms and size of the buildings. There are a number of different interrelated factors that that go into making a great place within a range of different character zones called transects. Transects are rated from a natural transects T-1 to T-6 which is the urban core, so the higher the number, the more intense the land use. A T-6 is obviously downtown and T-1 would be natural areas. In this case, the area is at the fringe of town so most of it is T-3 suburban, with some areas in the neighborhood centers that are T-4, general urban. Lehmann noted within each transect there's still a range of different kinds of character areas. For example, within the suburban transect, which is the bulk Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 5 of 25 of the subarea, there's neighborhood edge and in those areas one might see single family homes and duplexes, some cottage courts and those would largely be around existing development. There would also be neighborhood general, which would primarily be single family, but there's still the opportunity for duplexes, townhomes and maybe some small scale multifamily. For the T-4 neighborhood centers there is neighborhood small, which retains some small scale multifamily, has some larger clusters of townhomes, and some larger buildings are possible. Then in the center of those neighborhood centers would be neighborhood medium areas with larger multifamily (up to 12 or 16 dwelling units). Finally, there is the commercial cores, main street areas, which is like the North Side Marketplace, for example, or what one would think of as a traditional small town main street. Lehmann showed on the future land use map how all those areas are laid out. He pointed out the major streets within the area, Highway 218 to the east, Rohret Road to the north, Highway One to the south and he pointed out Maier Avenue that goes through the center of the area and also Kitty Lee Road on the east side. Lehmann also wanted to note that while it currently does not exist, the future Highway 965 is a major arterial that would connect all the way up to Coralville in the long term and would skirt the eastern edge of the landfill and would be a major arterial that would potentially be added to this area. Lehmann pointed out in this concept many of the features are similar to the old future land use map with the stormwater lake, park, and commercial area in the northeast and overall it's still largely residential. That being said, there are the neighborhood centers scattered throughout and it covers the full subarea. He also pointed out that on the far eastern edge there are some areas that aren't form -based land use areas, those are specifically commercial and commercial office areas that are existing with commercial development. Staff proposes that those would remain under the same commercial category. Lehmann also wanted to reiterate this is a future land use map, so while it looks very specific, it is a conceptual map showing one way that it could develop, how it actually develops will depend on property owners as they annex into the City and as they subdivide and rezone their land. At the time of annexation, they have to comply with City standards, which will attempt to do something like what is shown on the future land use map, but it's not going to look exactly like this concept. This map just shows some of those general themes that the City wants to see within the area, such as pedestrian linkages, neighborhood nodes, and an interconnected street network that disperses traffic. In terms of the way that it's laid out, the neighborhood edge area is generally along existing residential developments, and again it would be largely single family uses with maybe some duplexes or some cottage courts. The neighborhood edge is similar somewhat to an RS-5 zone. The next land use category, T-3 neighborhood general, is still predominantly single family, but it would also include some duplexes, it could include some cottage courts, some townhomes, and then some small scale multifamily as well. It's a relatively versatile zone and it would depend on the property owner as to what they'd be interested in. As they get into the neighborhood centers, those are the T-4 areas. Neighborhood small is largely used as a transition from those T-3 areas to the neighborhood centers. Also in some neighborhoods there may be small areas where there's, for example, streets that only have development on one side, the idea being that it can be really difficult to make it cost effective to build lower density homes along those areas. Lehmann pointed that out primarily along the park to the east, where there are some single - loaded streets, but they want that park to be a widely accessible, visible, and well -used resource. In the center of the neighborhood centers, is neighborhood medium, where there are larger scale Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 6 of 25 multifamily (up to 12 or 16 dwelling units). There are also the main street areas, there are only two main street areas proposed for this subarea and that is in the northeast and in the southwest but there are a number of other areas that are designated as open areas that would allow commercial uses. Lehmann showed a map to illustrate the difference between places where commercial is required, and places where commercial uses or other nonresidential uses are allowed. He also pointed out walksheds in the areas where commercial is required, in the northeast, and part of the reason for that is because it is right next to Highway 218 and there are requirements about no residential uses within a certain distance of the highway. That area isn't an appropriate place for residential, but it could be appropriate for some small-scale commercial uses. The other area is near an existing commercial district to the southwest. Lehmann noted there are other areas that would allow nonresidential uses, it may or may not be commercial, those are scattered throughout because one of the goals is to ensure that most people are within walking distance of one of the neighborhood centers. What the uses will be of course will depend on market forces and what property owners want to develop, but there are opportunities there. Lehmann noted perhaps things like childcare centers seems like it would be a good use for some of those areas as they're always looking for more of those across the City. He also pointed out some of the other special uses throughout this area. So, in addition to the neighborhood centers, they have two school sites that are identified, one is located next to the regional park in the northeast and that would be a site for a potential elementary school, they're also proposing a rec center in that area as well. Staff has identified a school site west of Maier Avenue as well and that site would be large enough to accommodate an elementary school as well as a junior high if that was needed in the future. There's also another park over there and a location for a future fire station which is a need in this area. Lehmann noted there are some private parks shown throughout the neighborhood as well, and to the west there's a large area that's a floodplain, depending on need and depending on sensitive features, there might be more or less of these and they might be located in different areas. Lehmann next discussed the thoroughfare map that is incorporated in the future land use plan, noting again it is just one way that the street network might look in the future. He pointed out some of the main routes through the area, noting staff wanted to make sure that there are a number of different routes so that not everyone is getting funneled to one or two roads, and the neighborhood streets are dispersed in each of those neighborhoods. Again, the future Highway 965 will be a major arterial going through the area to the west. With the neighborhood streets, staff would hope to see street trees and pedestrian friendly facades to ensure that it's a pleasant place to walk, a pleasant place a bike, a place where kids can walk to school, etc. Again, this is a future land use map so street design will depend on development but this is the vision of what they'd want to see because that can really improve traffic safety and traffic flow. Lehmann also pointed out a pedestrian passage network throughout the area with the goal to connect neighborhood centers to activity generators like parks and schools so that folks can easily walk or bike to those destinations. Lehmann reiterated this is a huge area, 1800 acres is a lot of space, and there are a number of different environmental factors that affect the way that infrastructure can be provided. First, the infrastructure that's currently being proposed under Highway 218 would service essentially the northeast part, but to expand further beyond that with gravity sewer, based on the topography and some ridge lines, there would need to be some additional substantial infrastructure improvements. For example, for the southeast area to develop they'd need a lift station to the south, for the northwest area to develop they'd need a lift station to the west, and then to the Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 7 of 25 southwest, that's within the long-term serviceable area, but it is not currently identified as to where the sewer service would come from. The Northeast would be expected to develop first, because of those infrastructure limitations and the other areas would depend on additional infrastructure investment. Elliott asked for more detail on the walkability of the area. Lehmann explained within the future land use map pedestrian passages are essentially a 20-foot-wide right-of-way that would allow larger block lengths, because a large part of walkability is ensuring that there's connections so that it's easy to walk from one place to another. With a 20-foot-wide right-of-way it would also have approximately a five-to-10-foot pedestrian paved path that people can use to navigate easier and it wouldn't be part of the street network, it'd be a separate network that would be exclusively for use by bikes and pedestrians, a trail essentially. Padron asked if those pedestrian/bike trails would be right next to a street or just its own path. Lehmann replied most of them are through the center of blocks. The form -based zoning code is organized to allow larger blocks where there's a pedestrian linkage through the middle. Elliott asked about the lift stations, and why the northeast would develop first. Lehmann stated that is what they would expect because the sewer is coming under Highway 218 roughly in the center of that park because that's where the water sheds to and sewer relies on gravity for its most cost-effective service. In other areas a lift station would need to be brought into the development based on watersheds and the way that it flows. However, if a developer can show that they can use gravity sewer to service any area then it could be developed. Elliott stated the streets are put in when the development happens, correct. Lehmann confirmed that is true and it is during the development process, including subdivisions and rezonings, where they get into the nitty gritty of the exact street networks and connections and how the sensitive areas are preserved. This is just a conceptual plan. Padron noted the last time that they talked about a big development like this all the neighbors were concerned about the response time of police and ambulances to reach, because there's going to be more people. So, this plan shows a fire station there but it doesn't show a police station. Lehmann stated the fire station question really depends upon the amount of development and their response times; those are the things that they track. The preliminary plans show the fire station relatively far west in this development because they indicated an interest that they would like to be able to access Rohret Road and the highway rather than be located either on Rohret or the highway. Again, this is a conceptual plan so when fire identifies that there's a need for that fire station, that's really when that would come in. With regards to police, a lot of that's done by patrols, not necessarily tied to a central location so it would depend on changing patrol patterns. Connectivity is really important for any future development in this area and ensuring that there are connections to the south and the north is important and would also help provide a response time and it prevent bottlenecks that might otherwise arise. Signs noticed a couple of comments, one in particular in one of the letters received, questioning why the district didn't extend to the south of Highway One. Lehmann replied the real reason is somewhat arbitrary as it's in a different planning district and so this plan doesn't address that area. Staff also don't anticipate development in that area for some time and are trying to focus on those areas that they're expecting to develop first based on demand and infrastructure availability. Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 8 of 25 Elliott noted when she looked at the Carson farm concept plan, they had noted that there were larger lots based on the typography, and in her mind it seems like a more pleasant plan, the concept plan just looks more pleasant. Lehmann noted as a Planning and Zoning Commissioner what they think is more pleasant could guide their decision making, but he would say that while the concept plan shows grid blocks, he does not anticipate grid blocks due to the topography and anticipates it to be a lot more curvilinear. Again, it really depends on final development as it comes in. The concept shows grid blocks primarily to show that there's connectivity throughout the area so there are not bottlenecks to neighborhoods and that it's easy to navigate. Wade asked Lehmann to share just a little bit from the conceptual standpoint to the point of a developer approaching and the development and how this plan could look a lot different from actual execution. Lehmann reiterated the Comprehensive Plan is the vision for the area but in terms of the way that development is actually regulated, it's done by the zoning code and the subdivision code and annexations since most of this area is not within City limits currently. So as a property owners annex into the City, they do an application and include a rezoning as part of that. Sometimes they are zoned interim development, if they're not sure what they want to do yet, and sometimes they'll rezone to a specific zone and also include a subdivision with that. It's at that point where they actually lay out block and start requiring traffic studies, etc., based on what developers are proposing. It's also at that point they have to see where the sensitive features are and map it to ensure that they're protected. The concept plan is an idea of what the City would like to see and some of the land use categories that they think are appropriate within different areas and the logic behind it, from transitions from existing homes, proximity to the highway or single loaded streets. But it's up to the developer to propose what they want to do, and then Planning and Zoning and Council to make those determinations about whether those comply with this Comprehensive Plan. Lehmann also reiterated all annexations to the City are voluntary, the Comprehensive Plan has a policy about annexations, it is only in extraordinary circumstances that they would consider involuntary annexations. Hekteon also noted before any of this gets developed, it would come back to the Commission with at least three applications for the annexation, rezoning and a subdivision. Lehmann next went into the analysis of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment noting it is based on two approval criteria that Comprehensive Plan Amendments need to meet. One is that circumstances have changed and/or additional information or factors that come to light such that the proposed amendment is in the public interest. Second is that it is compatible with other policies or provisions of the Comprehensive Plan including any District Plans. With regards to the first criteria the original plan was adopted 20 years ago and many things have changed in the City in terms of demographics, development, regulation and policy. In terms of demographics and development, since the time the Plan was adopted the City's added approximately 12,600 new residents and almost 3000 of those are west of Mormon Trek. The City also anticipates an additional 19,000 residents by 2040 based on the Metropolitan Planning Organization's projections. Some other changes in terms of development are that most land east of Highway 218 is now fully developed and some areas are also redeveloping, especially in the Riverfront Crossings District. Major infrastructure projects have been completed that improve traffic capacity, such as Camp Cardinal Boulevard and McCollister Boulevard. Lehmann also mentioned the closing of Roosevelt Elementary School, but that is a major part of the Roosevelt subarea plan, which is a different subarea and not touched by this. Lehmann also noted Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 9 of 25 annexations are decreasing and that the City needs to start planning for future growth and expansion. A lot of recent residential development has occurred through redevelopment within the downtown core, which has been important as it helps ensure compact development and a livable city, but they also want to make sure that they're planning for different areas of the City as infrastructure investments are being made. In terms of regulation and policy, the most substantial is that the zoning code and subdivision codes were updated in 2005 and 2008 and the City also adopted form -based zoning districts for greenfield sites in 2021. The Amendment today is looking at expanding where those should apply for future development within the City. The City has also seen an updated Comprehensive Plan in 2013 and an updated Fringe Area Agreement as part of that in 2021. The City has also had an increased focus on climate action with the adoption of the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan in 2018 and an increased focus on social justice and racial equity with Resolution 20-159 in 2020. Lehmann showed a map from 2003 of the area and discussed how development is occurring within the Southwest District. At that time Iowa City had 62,000 residents and since that time there have been numerous new residential developments and commercial developments, not all are within this subarea, but he wanted to highlight some areas that were close as well. Iowa City is now at almost 75,000 residents and expects to continue growing. With that population demand, there is a need to find housing and ensure that they can have that population within Iowa City. With regards to climate action, social justice, and racial equity that City Council has increasingly focused on, in terms of climate action the goals are to reduce carbon emissions by 45% by 2030 and reach a net zero emissions by 2050. One of the problems with the current future land use designations are they tend to lean towards the conventional zoning categories that would be built in the area, which has some issues as it relates to climate action. First, they're often single land use categories and low -density zoning often results in or contributes to higher greenhouse gas emissions due to spreading out different uses and having to drive to meet needs. Lower density also makes it harder to walk places and basically makes the personal car a requirement and auto -oriented development becomes the norm. Additionally, as more people drive there is traffic congestion. Form -based planning tries to address this is by looking at compact neighborhoods that can be easily traversed by foot, bike and bus in addition to cars. It's not to say that one can't travel through it by car, it still tries to provide a pleasant experience with that, but it wants to make sure that one can use more than just the car to get around. As a result, it seeks to improve the City's building and transportation systems by creating more pedestrian friendly streetscapes. With regards to the social justice and equity question, Lehmann noted the City is often focused on enhancing that often by approaching it through the lens of housing diversity and affordability. Again, one of the issues with conventional land use categories is that historically they have been used to promote racial and class segregation. In 1917 actual racial zoning was banned but there have been loopholes around it to try and use class segregation as de facto racial segregation as well. That includes using things like really large minimum lot sizes, or exclusively single-family zones where there are higher housing costs. Those items have worked with other policies that were racially motivated, such as redlining, slum demolition, and those sorts of things and Iowa City is not immune to that. Iowa City has racial covenants that are still on the books and 81 % of residential land is zoned for single family uses and over half of that is low -density single-family. That again plays into both of these factors of climate action and social justice. Form -based land use planning tries to address that by increasing housing choices, ensuring that there's a mix of housing types, which helps ensure a mix of housing price points. Staff believes that it is in the Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 10 of 25 public's interest to look at changing some of these policies to ensure more diverse housing options throughout the City. The second criterion for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment is related to ensuring that it is compatible with other policies in the Comprehensive and District Plans and other adopted City policies. Lehmann stated the proposed changes align with existing goals and objectives and they did not change the goals or objectives as they updated this plan. In addition, this amendment aligns with other policies such as the Council Strategic Plan, Climate Action Adaptation Plan, Black Lives Matter and Systemic Racism Resolution as all of those things work together to try and make Iowa City a better place. In terms of land use categories shown on the map, Lehmann stated the Comprehensive Plan for this area currently shows it as primarily residential at a density of two to eight dwelling units per acre. It includes some rural residential and some semipublic space and open space, in addition to small neighborhood commercial and mixed -use area. The Southwest District Plan largely follows that pattern and includes a mix of housing types such as large lot rural residential, single family, duplex residential, narrow lot townhouse residential, mixed use, neighborhood commercial, open space, public services and institutional uses. In terms of the uses that are allowed within the proposed future land use map, it maintains a lot of those similar uses, but it goes about it in a different way and uses form -based land use categories. It tries to look at similar building types and uses that are compatible with each other but interspersing those a bit more than the previous plan had done, where it was a more segregated pattern of development. The new future land use map shows a mix of building types throughout but does not include rural residential land uses as a type nor include future urban development as a type. It does continue to plan around neighborhood centers, but it includes more of those since it covers the full planning area. It also takes a closer look at streets than the previous map did with a goal of trying to look at all elements of the public realm that might make it a better place to live. In terms of policy, the existing plan already supports a lot of the goals within the Comprehensive Plan. There are goals to ensure a mix of housing types within each neighborhood, to encourage pedestrian oriented development, and to plan for commercial development and defined neighborhood nodes. There are also goals to preserve valuable farmland and open space, to preserve environmentally sensitive areas, and ensure that there are future parks with visibility and access. This map also ensures that those parks are open to the public with single loaded streets. Within the Southwest District Plan, the Rohret South subarea goals support the same goals for housing diversity, preserving natural features, streets that enhance neighborhood quality, and commercial development that serves local residents. It also discusses things such as adequate street and pedestrian access in space for neighborhood parks and trails, and then also establishing focal points for new neighborhoods. The Rohret South subarea specifically mentions a lake and park but also neighborhood centers and other such uses. Lehmann noted schools are another good neighborhood focal point as well. So based on all of these factors, staff believes these two approval criteria are met. Lehmann noted staff received public comments, those 13 letters were included in the agenda packet, and some of the concerns that are included in those were about involuntary annexation, housing affordability and housing for seniors. There were comments about looking at the area south of Highway One, looking at the design of Highway One and that the intersection of Kitty Lee Road and Highway One may be good for civic uses. There was a letter asking that the Maier Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 11 of 25 Avenue right-of-way be shifted a little bit. There was a letter from Kitty Lee Road residents who are concerned about traffic speeds, road design, and safety, and they ask that the separate primary street that's shown to the west be built first rather than using Kitty Lee Road as a thoroughfare. There was a request to incorporate a greenbelt from Hunters Run Park along Slothower for the proposed regional park and a concern the plan was too car centric and needs neighborhood centers and more bike paths and potentially more park around the lake. Taking these things into account, staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend approval of CPA22-0002, a proposed amendment to the Southwest District Plan to update background information and the section on the Rohret South Subarea, as proposed in Attachment 1. In terms of next steps, presumably the Planning and Zoning Commission would make a recommendation, a public hearing would be set at City Council, right now that is anticipated for January 10, then there would be a public hearing in front of Council, potentially on January 24. Hensch asked if this Rohret South subarea is identified as a growth area in the current fringe area agreements. Lehmann confirmed it is part of the City's growth area. Hensch noted he has been on the Commission for eight years and doesn't recall any involuntary annexations in Iowa City during that time or even in the past several decades. Lehmann stated the last one that he is aware of that was attempted was somewhere on the east side of town but that was 30 plus years ago. Hensch asked if there was an involuntary annexation what are the parameters that are established now to describe that process. Lehmann stated there are parameters, but he admitted he is not familiar with them because it just hasn't happened. He stated there are 20/80 annexations, which is a separate process, depending on land area of land annexed. Hektoen noted Iowa Code would govern it, chapter 368. Hensch asked if this form -based code discussed here tonight, is this the same form -based code that was adopted for use in the South District. Lehmann said it is the same future land use categories and they anticipate that they would use the form -based code that's approved for this South District. Hensch asked if the lift stations, when those are indicated as needed, are those constructed by the City and paid for by the City, or does the developer have any role in the construction or paying for that. Also, are any of the two identified future lift stations in any sort of current City plan. Lehmann replied the two lift stations are not in any near -term plan, they're just identified in the 2012 sewer master plan as long-term projects. He doesn't think that there's any plan for them through 2040. In terms of who would build them, normally the City would as they are a substantial infrastructure investment, however, the developer could build them if they wanted to build them prior to the City being willing to build them, that's their prerogative. He noted it would depend on development, growth pressure, and interest by developers. It's all those factors that would lead to development and would cause the City to prioritize the lift stations. Hensch noted looking the Comprehensive Plan, it is really just a question of a vision of what the City is going to look like in the future and provide guidance on planning for that to happen. In particular they are talking about the Rohret South subarea, and this is just simply some more detailed direction that City staff has put together and then is adopted by the City to address the unique issues and opportunities of that particular planning district but any specifics are Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 12 of 25 determined through rezoning, annexations, and subdivisions. Hensch wanted to confirm any of the maps that people are seeing are just concepts for a vision, there's no reality to any of those because that will occur as there's voluntary annexations and then developers present subdivision, rezoning, and annexation plans to the City. Lehmann confirmed that is correct and added it's the same regarding the specific street layout, any concerns about a particular road layout, grid layout, where different facilities or structures would be located, there is no true answer to that as it will occur as the annexations, rezonings and subdivisions happen. Signs was intrigued in both the public comments from the meeting and in some of the letters they received regarding the concern about the involuntary annexation because he had not heard of that in the 20 years he's been here. Should an involuntary annexation ever occur, and Iowa City has a policy against it, it would involve significant public input at that point. Hekteon stated there's a State City Development Board that would hear that kind of application and before that there are public notice and public meeting requirements that the City would have to go through. Signs stated the norm is for a landowner or a developer to come to the City with an annexation request. Hekteon confirmed that is correct. Signs noted the other thing that he saw a lot of in the comments and the letters was concern about the city doing this, or the city doing that and as he understands the development process, development requests are typically driven by the landowner and/or developer and the City doesn't own any of this land. Lehmann confirmed that is correct and the City has no plans to buy any of this land other than maybe for a fire station or things like that. One other thing that's a little unusual with this area is that because they are proposing regional stormwater, the City would likely take a more active role in something like that, especially with looking at potentially using that as park land as well. Therefore, there are some areas where the City would take a more active role but most of the development of streets and all of that stuff is pretty much driven by private developers and landowners as they develop their lands. Padron asked regarding the City owning the land, there are public parks and open spaces here and the City will own those. However, she stated it seems like there isn't enough green spaces for her liking but remembers for the South District it was said that when a developer comes and they develop their land, they may choose to put green space on their development correct. Lehmann explained the City has a policy with minimum open space requirements so as developers come in there's a formula used to ensure that there's open space provided based approximately on the number of folks that would live within that area, three acres per 1000 residents. That will all be determined at the time of subdivision. In some cases, they'll pay a fee in lieu if it's expanding another park. In this case, the park land that is shown on the map is the regional park and is around 84 acres. But again, this is a concept plan and is more the idea showing the proportion of different types of future land use categories, and then also making sure to highlight things that they want to ensure are included in the area, such as emergency services, schools, etc. Hensch wanted to clarify the City currently owns no land in that area so any of these areas that are being discussed would result from a voluntary sale between the landowner and the City. Hektoen stated it could also come in the form of a dedication at the time of the subdivision. Townsend noted staff spoke to the Resolution 20-159 and to enhancing social justice and racial equity in the Community and that this form -based land use helps address these wrongdoings but Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 13 of 25 the City needs to address that affordable housing piece. How do they get to the place that people can actually afford these homes. Lehmann acknowledged that's tough. One of the ways they tried to do it is by ensuring there's a mix of housing types where even if on a square foot basis, it costs the same for new construction. New construction is often not affordable but if there are some smaller units mixed in with larger units it would be more affordable as a result. Focusing on a mix of housing types and ensuring that there's different housing types and a mix within each area and within the neighborhood centers and throughout the whole planning area. Lehmann added the City has an affordable housing annexation policy so as land is annexed into the City there's an understanding that 10% of units should be affordable and that is determined at the time of annexation. Affordability is defined within the Comprehensive Plan and could be both ownership and rental. Wade noted Highway One does not have a pedestrian lane and is that part of the plan to correct that. Lehmann stated a lot of the times where they see trail connections occur is at the time of rezoning, especially if there's a need for pedestrian connection of some sort. Because this is a developing area the City would probably expect any trail connections or pedestrian connections to occur as part of the rezoning process and as development occurs they would expand the trail network as part of that. Wade noted the City has seen such a drastic decline in annexations, but over a third of recent annexations was for civic land, so what is the context of that. Lehmann replied that the City annexed a fair amount of land for use for stormwater purposes in the South District as part of the regional stormwater management and the sewer plant, that is the Sycamore Greenway. Hensch opened the public hearing. Mark Alatalo (4053 Kitty Lee Road) wanted to discuss the thoroughfare map and how it relates to Kitty Lee Road. He acknowledged that everything on this draft tonight is just that a draft and that any development depends on plans submitted to City Council and there's a whole process for that but he wanted to speak to the draft itself and about the connection at the north side of Kitty Lee Road. Basically, where it makes a hard left turn, as it gets close to Highway 218, and that's where he is concerned. He is concerned that Kitty Lee Road would be used more as a primary road and not as it shown as a secondary road. He knows that there is a desire from the City to get that regional park and stormwater facility there, with an elementary school and with a recreation center, and Alatalo feels they want to do that sooner rather than later and the idea would be to use a City road in lieu of having to wait for a landowner to annex or develop their parcels and Kitty Lee Road is an attractive place to just tack onto the end of it. Also if there are some utilities there a developer doesn't have to build a whole own new road so there's advantages and cost savings as the developer. Alatalo feels like if development of that park or the school or the rec center is dependent on taking advantage of Kitty Lee Road in that way, it is not fair to the 14 landowners on that road. The 14 landowners are taking it quite seriously, they have already submitted a letter signed by nine of them on that street, and there's several of them here tonight. Alatalo also noted Kitty Lee Road is quite hilly and if someone is traveling fast at all, it would create unsafe situations coming over top of those hills. There are driveways on either side of those hills that are quite close and quite blind as it is already so introducing more traffic into that spot is going to make it unsafe for people to back out of their own driveways. He would Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 14 of 25 not want to see any more traffic on Kitty Lee Road then absolutely needs to happen. Alatalo acknowledged that a default way to control traffic speeds is to install speed bumps but that is really no one's first pick of how to control traffic, speed bumps are a band aid way to solve the larger problem of people being able to travel where they want at the speeds they want. The solution is having land that's annexed and developed that can support a primary road and the places where people want to travel to these larger areas like the park and the school. Alatalo referenced Langenberg Avenue on the south side of town before it connects to McCollister Road, people would cut up through Langenberg and it's just a rather dense residential area. So speed bumps were installed there and are still installed to this day, even though McCollister connects. Alatalo doesn't think that's fair for those property owners to be dealing with traffic that was not intended for the road, even though now there's a different road that's supposed to handle that traffic, and they've been dealing with that for quite a long time. He would not want to see that kind of situation come to Kitty Lee Road. Also on this map, the proposed primary street that is the first one as someone is leaving town is a less direct path or arguably the same amount of directness as it would be to cut across Kitty Lee Road and get back to all those areas or cut up to Rohret Road so in this draft of the plan he doesn't see how Kitty Lee Road would not be utilized as a primary road. All that to say Kitty Lee Road is not a solution for the overuse of traffic on Rohret Road, there's other better solutions including connections to Slothower, improvements to Maier and other arterial roads going in before Kitty Lee Road is utilized. His request for the Commission tonight is that this plan is not approved with that connection at the end of Kitty Lee Road. Barb Halm (4090 Kitty Lee Road) has lived on that road for 50 years and has experienced that road being a through road, it was Mormon Trek from the end of Benton Street straight to Highway One and there was a great deal of traffic they experienced and now it is being considered to be returned to that and she has a lot of safety concerns. To briefly describe that area, from Highway One it's very rural, there's the pasture and the back fence of Menards and then you come up over a hill but before you reach the crest of that hill you have no vision of what's on the other side of that hill. As you reach the top, there are three driveways right below the crest of that hill, hers being one of them. Every time she goes to pull out of her driveway, she is just hoping there's nobody coming over the hill. Now with it being dead end it's not as bad as it was in past years. Halm also acknowledged that when there is a big snowstorm, that road becomes impassable. In past years when it was a through road cars were off the road very frequently and in big numbers when there was a bad storm, there are no shoulders on that road. She invited the Commissioners to come out and just take a look at that road sometime and see what they're dealing with out there. In closing, she shared an experience she had just this last Saturday, a friend came to pick her up as she was getting ready to pull out of the driveway out of the blue she said every time she pulls out of the driveway, she's afraid a car's going to come over the hill. Halm asked how the Commission would feel if a friend that said that to them. Dan Black appreciated the opportunity to make a couple of comments and would echo what's already been said here and in some of the concerns that were in the agenda packet. His three greatest concerns really are the roads, Highway One, Rohret Road and Kitty Lee Road. He acknowledged that this is all preliminary but from a design concept right now they're showing a lot access on the Highway One and that might be necessary and needed, but he really thinks that they need to be talking sooner rather than later to the Iowa DOT with regards to their plans Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 15 of 25 for Highway One because this is a major entryway into Iowa City, it's of great importance for not only this kind of development, but also possible commercial development down the road here. So he really encourages them to get Iowa DOT as soon as they can on this kind of stuff. Black also said in defense of his comments to go south on Highway One, they've already leaped over Highway One and the development across from Menards is a pretty good-sized development on the south side so that was why he thought it should actually be included. He understands it's very nice and clean to make Highway One the boundary, but it's all so tangled up together and it just seems like it's prudent to take a look at that. Black also wanted to echo what his neighbors and friends on Kitty Lee Road had to say with regards to it being an old country road and it's going to need a whole lot of improvement to make it to make it safe and make it right for this development. He doesn't quite know who does it or who bears the expense but it's one that really needs to be factored in as they go down the road here. Rohret Road isn't a whole lot better, but it's not nearly as steep as Kitty Lee Road. He appreciates Commissioner Elliott's comments on the topography, he sees the same thing when he looks at the maps and the design concepts of straight lines and that sort of thing. He has spent a lifetime on that country out there and there's some nasty slopes and some nasty hills and it only seems prudent to design around some of these obstacles. He also acknowledged during snowstorms getting up and down some of those hills is extreme. Black also acknowledged he has been very appreciative of the staff's efforts to communicate and returning phone calls and talking through this, he has had a real good experience with staff. Maria Story (1223 Duck Creek Drive) lives on the first road past Highway 218 and was initially pretty opposed to some of the development ideas going on when she first got that letter back in January 2020. She attended the open house in early September and was really impressed with all the thought that had gone into the planning of this property including thinking about things like terrain and the neighborhood centers and she thinks that's been successful in other parts of Iowa City. Her big concern with the plan at the moment is just that commercial area that's proposed right on the northeast corner of the Highway 218 and Rohret Road. There's a lot of traffic on Rohret Road already and while she understands there's plans to help alleviate some of that traffic, they're talking about developing a whole other section of the City. So, in general she is supportive of the plan and thinks that it's a good plan but would like extreme caution to be taken with specifically that commercial area because of the amount of traffic that's already there. Victoria Concha (4086 Kitty Lee Road) wanted to echo all the concerns for safety on Kitty Lee Road, she also lives on one of those driveways where none of them back down the driveways due to the hills. When her sons who are now young adults are over and they backed out in the driveway, she is terrified. They all turn around and drive straight down because one cannot safely go across that road as it is with 14 homes and they know that people going up and down that road. When her sons were young car dealerships used Kitty Lee Road for test driving cars, and the number of times her husband ran after cars because they almost hit a child terrifies her to think that that can happen again. Not just car dealerships, but anybody going down that road. She has lived on that road for going on 29 years and echoes the same concern about the snow removal. Again, they cannot get their out of their own driveways on snowy days, it will take multiple tries and when they do get out of their driveway they can't make it up that hill. Even in the summertime they drive slowly on that road and they know what it's like. There has been a number of times she has crested that hill and felt like she is going to hit someone head on. Concha added there are no sidewalks, no curbs, no shoulders, nothing, if a car goes off the road, it goes into their front yard or into a ditch and then they have to get it out of there. If there is a lot Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 16 of 25 of traffic going up and down the road the wear and tear on Kitty Lee Road will be immense. She did not live there when it was a through street but did live there when they put it in the Menards and had to live through that and the wear and tear on that front half of Kitty Lee Road is terrible. She can't imagine the construction vehicles going up and down Kitty Lee Road to try and do development for that number of housing that's going there. Another reason she is super concerned, she knows this is all concept and who knows how long before it's going to happen, and it all is based on development, but Carson has wanted to develop this area and has taken it to the City and been denied at least twice, and has now taken it to the County, so that is just waiting in the wings. They can say this is the future 20 - 30 years but it's closer than that if Carson wants to sell and wants to develop Kitty Lee Road, and if it goes through, they will all be impacted. She fears for anybody living in and trying to get up and down that road. Kris Sehr (4047 Maier Ave) has some serious concerns about being forced to annex. When they bought the property they wanted to live in the country, and still want to live outside of the City limits. She has no desire to live in the City limits and to be ignored, nor do many of her neighbors. Beyond that, they talked a lot about Maier Avenue, which is currently a gravel road, and she understands this is a concept and this is in the future, but obviously Maier would have to change significantly. In the northeast section there's already lots and lots of traffic from Kalona or from Sharon Center Road that uses that as a cut off. Lots of people go far too fast for a gravel road to get over to Rohret Road and the more they develop that area, the more that's going to happen. So again, if the plan is to develop northeast she thinks that there's going to be some kind of some consequences sooner than what they might think. Her driveway is a blind driveway, which scared her to death when her kids were learning to drive, the school bus would not stop at her house because of the little hill that was on and they didn't feel it was safe for a school bus to be stopped there. So that concerns her again, more traffic put there when there's not really great visibility. Sehr also noted there's a subdivision on the west side of Maier closer and she hasn't heard any talk about widening that road, but if they do, they're going to be taking people's yards. One of the other people that commented about moving that road to the east, which would be away from his yard, she can certainly appreciate. She acknowledged she hasn't been approached and been told if this happens, they're going to lose part of their front yard. Sehr asked if they have the choice to say, "No, I'm not annexing and you can't use my yard to widen the road" and that there's a lot of unanswered vagueness about saying owners never have to annex. She owns six acres, which is relatively in the middle of that Maier Avenue stretch, so if she says no to annexation, then does the plan get changed or will the City come back and say too bad, you don't have a choice. She has some serious concerns about that. She also would like to note that one of the things that was changed from the previous plan to the newer plan was the removal of the valuation of farm ground, which apparently means they don't care about farm ground anymore. Jill Tentin ier (4047 Kitty Lee Road) stated she lives at the very last house so the connection would directly affect her so her only ask is that Kitty Lee Road not be connected because it would be a de facto thoroughfare. Also they know that development is inevitable, but they do not want to be annexed. Kelsey Sehr (4047 Maier Ave) noted a big concern as they've seen a lot in the feedback is people worried about being annexed into the City. Again, if one chooses not to be annexed in what happens with like the sidewalks along Highway One, that's going to take quite a few people's front yards and some of those houses are very close to Highway One, and if it is Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 17 of 25 widened to put in a shoulder or sidewalks, people will lose their entire front yards. Same on Kitty Lee Road or Maier Avenue. So even though the City is saying that people aren't going to be annexed in, there's people have also lived there for their entire lives and that would be making major changes, even if they decided not to be annexed into the City because obviously they are going to need to widen roads, and then they're going to need sidewalks. Sehr also noted secondly, the safety concern. People do drive up and down Maier Avenue much over 55. They can put a 35 speed limit, but people are still going to go 65-70 and that's something that they've personally taken to the secondary roads many times about lowering the speed limit without anyone having any sort of solution or real concern about that. Victoria Concha (4086 Kitty Lee Road) forgot to mention about the annexation as she is also concerned about that. The roads and Menards already behind them, that's her backyard, is annexed to the City. The first half of Kitty Lee Road is City owned and the rest of it is County and she can't imagine that if everything across Kitty Lee Road becomes annexed to the City, and everything north is annexed, and everything south as annexed, they're really going to have this two mile stretch of land that is not annexed into the City. She knows her neighbors and the majority, at least, are not interested in that. She also wants to echo the concern about those feeder streets at the south end of Kitty Lee Road, that's about less than half of a mile so she is not sure how they get five blocks in there and how they have five streets. People should take a drive out there and take a look and see is it a good idea or not. Hensch closed the public hearing. Signs moved to recommend approval of CPA22-0002, a proposed amendment to the Southwest District Plan to update background information and the section on the Rohret South Subarea, as proposed in Attachment 1. Townsend seconded the motion. Signs acknowledged he totally hears the concerns from the residents of Kitty Lee Road and honestly shares the general concern about the traffic as this area develops, it's going to put a tremendous burden on Rohret Road in particular. Also one of the things that has been talked a lot today was Slothower extension up to Melrose, and he thinks that's going to be a critical piece of the puzzle, some of the additional major thoroughfares coming off of Highway One, heading north will be a critical piece of the puzzle. As far as the need to make a change, specifically about Kitty Lee Road in this plan, this is such a conceptual plan and having been on the Commission now for six or seven years, rarely do these things end up anything quite like what they're drawn in at this phase of the game. The public will have so many opportunities to give specific feedback and issues when these things do come before a Council and he is of the belief that probably the initial development is going to happen off of Rohret Road and not off of Kitty Lee Road coming in from the south just because that's where the development is happening now. The landowner who has come to the City before that's where they're looking at developing. Signs is generally in support of the plan, he doesn't see a need to exclude Kitty Lee Road or change the Kitty Lee Road piece of it because he doesn't think it's likely to end up being that way and there'll be plenty of opportunity, if someone comes forward with a plan that does show that to voice concerns. Hensch agreed and is completely sympathetic to people talking about the road issues but Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 18 of 25 remember that when this comes into the City they'll have to meet urban design standards and right now the road is at rural design standards. He would venture to guess that a right-of-way already exists on those properties that some people probably think is their property. But the right- of-way is actually there adjacent to the roadway and that's just how it is on all rural roads, they're 66 feet. The road may only be 25 feet, but then there is right-of-way land on both sides. He acknowledged sometimes the right-of-way isn't sufficient to meet the design standards and then there would have to be a voluntary agreement to purchase that right-of-way. He also agrees with Signs that this is a broad vision and this is not prescriptive, it's simply descriptive of that vision. He has had rezonings in his neighborhood that he wasn't happy with and they happened anyway so he understands the intense feelings, but stressed they need to just keep in mind that there's a lot of additional steps if this is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and by City Council, that when specific plans come in for the rezoning and annexations and the subdivisions, that's where things have to have actual maps drawn and the layouts actually occur. Right now it's so conceptual and simply a vision. He would bet if they looked at this 30 years from now, it's going to look markedly different than it does now. He does support this because he thinks it's really important to have this vision for this District that doesn't exist now. It's already in the Fringe Area Agreement, all land that's adjacent the City, the area outside of that for two miles, and if it's a future land use growth area, the City has already said how the plans are to grow into that and they have to prepare for that. He is sympathetic to people with their concerns and acknowledged that's why it is very important that people participate in the public process. So when these rezonings, annexation and subdivisions occur, get your voice heard and bring these things forth, so that it meets your needs. Hektoen wanted to clarify if the City does engage in a public improvement project, such as construction of a street, sometimes they do exercise condemnation authority but that is different than annexation. However, that is a situation in which it may result in a less than voluntary arrangement, but compensation is paid, and negotiations are had. She noted it's pretty rare that they actually get to condemnation. Hensch added when land is taken by eminent domain, it is a citizen committee that listens to those concerns and develops that price. Hektoen noted appraisals are obtained and fair market value is paid. Padron stated she supports the plan as the way it is right now. Elliott stated she went on Kitty Lee Road and it's a beautiful area but acknowledged it is very hilly, so she hears what they're saying. She appreciates both the comments to explain the concept plan and staff's help with what the concept is, she supports the plan. Hensch stated on those areas with the slopes, there's protected slopes and there are sensitive slopes. The City already has regulations about impinging or disturbing those slopes so these roads will not go straight, because those slopes, depending on their status, can't be impinged upon, or there's pretty tight regulations about that. Likely they will end up with a curvilinear design because this is a hilly area. Signs noted regarding the walkability factor, and they hear this in every neighborhood replanning, the community is very strong on walkability and bikeability so the City looks for opportunities for that every chance they can, but the reality is they have land with contours to deal with along the way. Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2022 Page 19 of 25 Wade stated he had the opportunity to go through the letters and hear the voices tonight and appreciates everybody being involved in the process, understanding that this is just a conceptual process at this point, and not implementation of the road is going to connect or so on. For that reason, he thinks providing a guidance for growth makes sense. However, he does understand the neighbors on Kitty Lee Road being concerned about the traffic on that road and where concerns come into place as far as the topography, speed, introducing traffic calming, avoiding speed bumps, etc. He acknowledged that would be one of the considerations in the future from a development standpoint. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. REZ22-0011: Consideration of an amendment to Title 14, Zoning to enhance land use regulations related to solar energy systems and further climate action goals. Lehmann noted this is a case that came before the Commission on November 2 because the Climate Action Committee wanted to make sure to address any goals or issues in the zoning code that might prevent the implementation for solar energy systems within Iowa City. Staff looked through the code and looked at best practices to see if there's anything else they can do to try and enhance some of those climate action goals. On November 2 staff came before this Commission with some proposals that included adding and clarifying some definitions, limiting regulatory barriers within the zoning code, providing regulatory incentives for projects that are aligned with climate action goals, and finally, a set of standards related to electric vehicle readiness and requiring that within parking areas. This Commission provided feedback requesting additional information on requiring chargers in addition to EV readiness and had some requests about applying it to handicap parking spaces. At this time, staff is still evaluating best practices and figuring out what other communities are doing because it's a pretty substantial step to move from EV readiness to EV chargers. Staff does have some good examples, but they don't have a recommendation yet so in the meantime, staff would like to continue with the other three items that were proposed on November 2 and then would bring before the Commission any EV related amendments once they have a recommendation formulated. Staff has drafted a revised zoning code amendment and removed all the regulations related to EV readiness. In terms of current regulations, there's two branches of regulations, one related to accessory solar energy systems and one related to utility scale ground mounted solar, which is a principal use. For accessory solar systems they're allowed administratively as mechanical structures, but they're not explicitly defined that way within the zoning code so that's one of the things staff wants to address. There are also some specific use standards related to screening, setbacks, and design that they're looking at changing to prevent potential barriers. With regards to utility scale ground mounted solar, those are for uses that are over one acre in size, it's its own principal use and is allowed provisionally in industrial and public zones and by special exception in most other nonresidential zones. It is not allowed in residential or form -based zones. Lehmann noted those regulations were adopted in 2019 and staff is not proposing to modify those. Staff is primarily looking at accessory solar energy systems and at some additional things they think will help try to address those climate action goals. In addition, staff has an administrative process for historic and conservation district overlay zones, typically everything within those zones that are exterior improvements are otherwise reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission. Memo: To: Kirk Lehman, City of Iowa City From: Black Hills Farms, LLC Managing Partner, Dan Black Topic: Planning S.W. District Iowa City, IA Date: December 22, 2022 Kirk, I read and reviewed the materials from the September 1, 2022 public meeting at Weber Elementary. I have also re -read a memo I sent to your attention in 2021 when the city was excepting comments on the S.W. District proposed Land Use Draft. I also attended your P-Z Meeting in early December, 2022. There are several items of continuing concern in the most recent Land Use Draft. As mentioned in my 2021 Memo and I reiterate here, by neglecting to include Hwy 1 and the IDOT in this initial planning for the S. W. District seems short sided and incomplete. I believe your Land Use Draft Map # 7 speaks to this very point with over 15 street accesses points on to Hwy #1. It seems only reasonable to have a discussion with the IDOT on a frontage road or four lane system, now rather than later. I continue to believe that it would be prudent to include the south side of Hwy #1 in this Planning District. An additional concern, is road placement that goes against contours and existing slopes. As pointed out in my 2021 Memo there are several possible road routes that follow relatively flat topography. A safer and less costly route. Other Thoughts: The whole S.W. District Plan, the Carson Lake Project and Iowa City's progressive nature, begs for "out of box" thinking. I read with great interest the community of Cumming, Iowa approving, the Middlebrook Development, an "Agrihood" concept that may include community gardens or perhaps even a small working farm. A concept worth exploring. Thank -you Item Number: 7.b. CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org January 10, 2023 Motion setting a public hearing for January 24, 2023 on an ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 31.2 acres of property located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8). (REZ22-0012) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Packet for 12-21-22 2022-12-21 P&Z Prelim Minutes STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ22-0012 Western Home GPD oflowaCity GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant/Owner: Contact Person: Requested Action: Purpose: Prepared by: Kirk Lehmann, Associate Planner Date: December 21, 2022 Pat O'Leary Western Home Independent Living Services, Inc. 5703 Caraway Lane Cedar Falls, IA 52246 Michael Welch Welch Design and Development michael@welchdesigndevelopment.com Rezoning from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPDIRS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPDIRS-8). Construction of a senior living community with 35 single-family homes, 8 duplex units, 38 multi -family units, 20 townhome-style units, and 1 assisted living building with 32 beds Location: East of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane Location Map: Size: 31.2 Acres 2 Existing Land Use; Zoning: Surrounding Land Use; Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District: Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: UndevelopedNacant Open Space; Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) North: South: East: West: Residential; Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) Residential & Institutional; Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Low Density Multi -Family (RM-12) Residential; Rural Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RR-1) Undeveloped/Vacant Open Space; Low Density Multi -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) Residential, 2-8 Dwelling Units Per Acre None NW1 Property owners and occupants within 500' of the property received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. A rezoning sign was posted onsite at Gathering Place Lane. October 12, 2022 The applicant waived the 45-day review period. The applicant, Western Home Independent Living Services, is requesting approval for the rezoning of 31.2 acres from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8) for land located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane. The Preliminary Planned Development Overlay and Sensitive Areas Development Plan is provided in Attachment 3. The proposed development would allow for the construction of a senior living community with 35 single-family homes, 8 duplex units, 38 multi -family units, 20 townhome-style multi -family units, and an assisted living building with 32 beds. Elevations are provided in Attachment 4. The plan proposes improving Camp Cardinal Road to City standards and extending Deer Creek Road to Gathering Place Lane. This block would contain the 32-bed assisted living building and 20 townhome-style units with a shared alley and parking. From the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Gathering Place Lane, the plan proposes to further extend Gathering Place Lane through the subject property in an arc to the east, terminating at a temporary turnaround on the north side of the St. Andrews Presbyterian Church property to the southeast. The multifamily buildings (which include 38 multi -family units, a clubhouse, and neighborhood commercial uses) are on the west side of this extension of Gathering Place Lane. Two cul-de-sacs and a loop street are shown north of the extension with 8 duplex units at some corners and the remainder consisting of single-family homes. 3 Additional single-family homes and a stormwater retention basin are shown south of the extension. The site contains regulated sensitive features including slopes, woodlands, a stream corridor, and wetlands. The Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan (SADP) proposes reducing wetland buffers, which requires a Level II Sensitive Areas Review. In a Level II Sensitive Areas Review, the SADP is evaluated as a planned development that must comply with the applicable approval criteria set forth in Article 14-3A"Planned Development Overlay Zone (OPD)" of the Iowa City Zoning Code. Good Neighbor Policy: The surrounding property owners were notified of the proposed rezoning. A Good Neighbor meeting was held at St. Andrews Presbyterian Church on August 25, 2022. A summary of the meeting is included in Attachment 5. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: The northern portion of the subject property (approximately 27 acres) is zoned Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS). This zone is intended for areas of managed growth in which agricultural and other nonurban land uses may continue until the City is able to provide services and urban development can occur. The interim development zone is the default district to which all undeveloped areas should be classified until City services are provided. The southern portion (approximately 4 acres) is zoned Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5). This zone is primarily intended to provide housing opportunities for individual households and to create, maintain, and promote livable neighborhoods. The code allows some flexibility of dwelling types to provide housing opportunities for a variety of household types and some nonresidential uses that contribute to the livability of residential neighborhoods, such as parks, schools, religious institutions, and daycare facilities. However, nonresidential uses should be planned and designed to be compatible with the character, scale, and pattern of the residential development. The OPD overlay permits flexibility in the use and design of structures and land in situations where conventional development may be inappropriate and where modification to requirements of the underlying zone will not be contrary to the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code, inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, or harmful to the surrounding neighborhood. Proposed Zoning: The applicant is requesting to rezone the area (31.2 acres) to Medium Density Single -Family with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8). The purpose of this zone is primarily to provide for the development of small lot single-family dwellings. Due to impacts to the sensitive areas, an OPD is required, which also allows for a mixture of uses, provided that additional criteria in section 14-3A-4 and 14-3A-5 of the Code are met. The OPD also allows the applicant to request waivers for certain zoning standards. In this case, a mix of single-family, duplex, and multi -family residential uses, in addition to commercial uses, are proposed which requires careful attention to site and building design to ensure compatibility with the character, scale, and pattern of the residential development. The applicant is also requesting a rear setback reduction on the north property line for one single-family home, a front setback reduction for several homes around the bulbs of Camille Court and Clara Court, a front setback reduction for a few townhome units, an on -site parking reduction for the neighborhood commercial use, and a height increase for the multi -family and mixed use buildings. These are discussed in detail below. General Planned Development Approval Criteria: Applications for Planned Development rezonings are reviewed for compliance with the following standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Zoning Code. 1. The density and design of the Planned Development will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of land use, building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout. 4 Density: The applicant is requesting to rezone to OPD/RS-8, which allows for a density of 8 dwelling units per net acre of land area (total land minus street rights -of -way). The proposed 35 single-family homes, 8 duplex units, 38 condominium -style units, and 20 townhome-style units add up to 101 total units across the 27.02 acres of net site area, which equals 3.7 dwelling units per acre. A building with 32 assisted group living beds is also proposed but does not count towards the density requirement. Overall, the proposed plan complies with the planned development density requirements for an RS-8 base zone. Land Uses Proposed: The applicant is proposing a mix of single-family, duplex, townhome, multi- family, and assisted living residential structures on three shared lots, in addition to a small neighborhood commercial use. The proposed development is intended to be a senior living community. Based on the onsite parking provided for the multi -family and mixed use buildings, these must be occupied as elder apartments unless additional onsite parking is provided. However, other housing types may be occupied by non -seniors if the intent changes in the future. Surrounding zones include Rural Residential (RR-1) to the east, Low Density Single -Family Residential (RS-5) to the north and southeast, and Low Density Multi -Family Residential (RM- 12) to the south and west. Most surrounding properties also have Planned Development Overlays (OPDs), largely due to sensitive features. Surrounding land uses include single-family homes to the north and east, St. AndreWs Church to the southeast, and multi -family condominiums to the south. The property to the west is undeveloped but was rezoned in October 2022 to allow duplex, townhome, and multi -family units. The proposed mix of housing types complements existing homes nearby and future development plans. Mass, Scale, and General Layout: Due to potential impacts to sensitive areas, the layout is more compact than a conventional development in a single-family residential zone. The proposed assisted group living, townhome, multi -family, and small-scale commercial uses are on the west/southwest side of the property. This is near other more intense uses including St. Andrew's Church, the Cardinal Villas Condominiums, and proposed uses such as the Camp Cardinal Event Center to the southwest and Cardinal Heights subdivision to the west with a proposed mix of duplex, townhome, and multi -family buildings. The higher intensity uses on the subject property have the best access to major streets, though they are also near an existing single- family home at 608 Camp Cardinal Boulevard. That home is zoned interim development however, so redevelopment may occur in the future. The proposed development transitions to less intense uses to the north and east with predominantly single-family homes along Gathering Place Lane and Camille Court, Clara Court, and Timothy Court, with duplexes on some corner lots. Overall, the layout maintains an appropriate transition to surrounding neighborhoods. Elevations for all proposed uses are available in Attachment 4. Single-family and duplex units are all one story (some with walk -out basements), The assisted group living building is two stories, the townhomes are three stories, and the multi -family and mixed use buildings are three - and -a -half stories. Buildings in this zone cannot typically exceed 35 feet in height and their footprints must comply with lot coverage standards. However, the applicant has requested an increase in height limits for the multi -family and mixed use buildings which would allow them to be approximately 45 feet tall. The elevations demonstrate that off-street parking does not dominate the streetscape. For single-family and duplex units, garages are recessed behind the facade of the dwellings in a manner that allows the residential portion to predominate along the street. Parking areas for the townhomes and assisted group living uses are accessed via a shared alley. Parking areas for the multi -family and mixed use buildings are underground, with limited surface parking. Standards relating to mass, scale, and layout will be reviewed at the site plan and building permitting stages to ensure full compliance with these requirements. Lighting for the any development must follow standards that minimize glare and Tight trespass for nearby properties. Illumination cannot exceed 0.5 initial horizontal foot-candles and 2.0 5 initial maximum foot-candles at any property line adjacent to or across the street from a residential zone, in addition to standards related to height and shielding. The development must also meet low illumination district standards which require the maximum total outdoor light output for the development to be less than 50,000 initial lumens per acre. Downcast streetlights are anticipated at every intersection and at every dead-end or cul-de-sac to enhance intersection identification and safety. A lighting plan will be reviewed during site plan. Open Space: The proposed development must comply with the private open space standards outlined in section 14-2A-4E of the Zoning Code. The east multi -family building with 22 units requires 550 square feet of private usable open space (10 SF per bedroom), while the west multi -family building with 16 units requires 400 square feet and the assisted group living and townhome buildings require a combined 920 square feet. In addition, single-family and duplex units require a minimum open space square footage of 500 and 300 per dwelling, respectively. All uses on the plan are shown with adequate private open space, and much of the remaining area is left as open space to retain stormwater and protect sensitive features. Traffic Circulation: Initially, the proposed development will only have access off Camp Cardinal Boulevard through the extension of Camp Cardinal Road. This access point is built to collector standards from Camp Cardinal Boulevard to Gathering Place Lane, at which point Gathering Place Lane to the proposed Deer Creek Road extension is built to collector standards. Secondary access to the site is anticipated following the extension of Deer Creek Road from Camp Cardinal Boulevard to the west as part of the Cardinal Heights subdivision. Section 15- 3-2K of the Subdivision Code allows the City to request an applicant contribute 50 percent of the cost of bringing a segment of street abutting a property to City standards. Staff recommends as a condition of the rezoning that the owner contribute 50 percent of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards prior to issuance of building permit, including the cost of building the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road which will serve as a traffic calming device. Access to the northern portion of the site will be along Gathering Place Lane from its intersection with Deer Creek Road. This northern area will only have a single point of access for the foreseeable future due to sensitive areas and existing neighborhood layouts. Specifically, connecting to other existing neighborhoods is not possible due to their street layout to the east and north, which incorporates loop streets with no potential areas for connection. However, the Gathering Place Lane extension is stubbed out on the eastern portion of the St. Andrew's property with a temporary turnaround to allow future connectivity should that area develop. 2. The development will not overburden existing streets and utilities. The property can be serviced by both sanitary sewer and water. However, water service must be looped from the termination of Gathering Place Lane extension to reduce issues associated with water stagnation and increase firefighting capacity. This may require off -site service through the St. Andrew's property, though the final route will be identified prior to approval of a final plat in compliance with City requirements. Access to the site will be provided through the extensions of Camp Cardinal Road, Gathering Place Lane, and Deer Creek Road (which will provide secondary access when the proposed Cardinal Heights subdivision is developed to the west). If Cardinal Heights develops, the southern portion of the property would have two points of access but the remainder would still only have one point of access. For the full development to have secondary access, additional development would need to occur on the eastern portion of the St. Andrew's property. The proposed development is expected to have 309 daily trips at Deer Creek Road and Gathering Place Lane, which is less than the 500 vehicle trips that would cause it to become overburdened. Should Cardinal Heights not develop, the single point of access would be Camp 6 Cardinal Road at Camp Cardinal Boulevard. Because Camp Cardinal Road follows collector street rather than local street standards, the vehicle trip threshold is significantly higher to become overburdened. As a result, staff does not anticipate any problems. A unique feature of the proposed plan is the diagonal on -street parking in front of the multi- family and mixed use buildings. Staff finds this reasonable, given the proposed commercial uses at that location. However, the Public Works Department does not have a practice of maintaining such parking spaces. Therefore, if the applicant constructs such spaces, staff recommends a condition that the owner maintain the diagonal on -street parking spaces, including snow removal. Staff recommends that this obligation be further detailed in an agreement executed at the time a final plat is approved. 3. The development will not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. The applicant has requested a setback reduction from 20 feet to 16 feet for one of the single- family homes along the north property line. However, the nearest neighbors to the north of the subject property are separated by a woodland preservation area and stream corridor. Neighbors to the east also have a further separation of more than 30 feet due to an existing pipeline easement. Properties to the west and south are separated by setbacks that are typical in single-family zones. As such, the proposed development will not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. 4. The combination of land uses and building types and any variation from the underlying zoning requirements or from City street standards will be in the public interest, in harmony with purpose of this Title, and with other building regulations. The applicant is requesting a number of waivers including reduced setbacks, increased building height, a mix of uses, and a modification to the commercial parking requirement. Each variation and its approval criteria are discussed in the following sections, but overall, the proposed development and all requested waivers appear to be in the public interest and in harmony with the purpose of this title. Setback Reductions: The applicant is requesting to reduce the rear setback along the north property line from 20 feet to 16 feet, to reduce the front setback for a few single-family homes on the bulbs of Camille Court and Clara Court from 25 feet to 15 feet, and to reduce the front setback for a fewtownhomes along Camp Cardinal Road and Gathering Place Lane from 20 feet to 15 feet. To receive a reduction, the applicant must demonstrate that the conditions at 14-3A-4K-la are met, including but not limited to adequate light, air, and privacy; adequate private open space for each dwelling unit; and sufficient area for utilities and street trees. Additionally, front setback reductions for single-family homes must elevate the first floor 30 inches above the grade of the adjacent sidewalk. Because this is a senior housing development, the applicant has requested an exception to this approval criteria pursuant to 14-3A-7 to allow the homes to be zero entry. For an exception to be granted, it must be in harmony with the purpose and intent of Code and Comprehensive Plan; must generally enhance the proposed development and not have an adverse impact on its physical, visual or spatial characteristics; must not result in a configuration of lots or a street system that is impractical or detracts from the appearance of the proposed development; and must not result in danger to public health, safety or welfare by preventing access for emergency vehicles, inhibiting the provision of public services, depriving adjoining properties of adequate light and air, or violating the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code or Comprehensive Plan. For the proposed reductions and requested exception, all relevant criteria appear to be met. 7 Building Height: The applicant is requesting an increase in the building height for the multi- family and mixed use buildings from 35 feet to 45 feet to allow a gathering space and rooftop patio on the top stories of both buildings. The maximum building height may be modified pursuant to 14-3A-4K-1 b where the design of the development results in sufficient light and air circulation for each building and adequate, accessible open space for all residents of the development. In addition, at least 35 percent of the net land area in the development must be free of buildings, parking, and vehicular maneuvering areas. Based on the elevations, the additional height is used to accommodate an additional half -story on the top of buildings, which is stepped back to maintain light and air for each building, and the proposed patios add usable outdoor space for residents. In addition, well over 35 percent of the proposed development, including sensitive features and stormwater management facilities, is open space. Consequently, staff believes an increase in building height is warranted. Mix of Uses: The applicant is requesting a mix of land uses and building types that is different from what is typically allowed in a RS-8 zone, including multi -family, assisted group living, and neighborhood commercial uses. To allow additional land uses, the applicant must meet all approval criteria at 14-3A-4C-1. Based on the following analysis, the proposed the mix of uses appears appropriate given the intent of the development and transitions to surrounding areas. Regarding residential uses, a mix of housing types, including single-family, two-family, and multi -family dwellings, is encouraged in all residentially zoned planned developments. The proposed mix for senior housing provides a range of types in such a way that maintains compatibility between uses, and buildings utilize similar architectural elements, scale, massing, and materials. Commercial uses are permitted in residentially zoned planned developments where the property is 2 acres or larger. Such commercial uses should be designed to serve as a focal point of the development, should be designed compatibly with adjacent residential uses, and is encouraged to incorporate open spaces such as town squares. Mixed use buildings with residential and commercial uses are also encouraged. In addition, commercial uses should be of a scale suited to serve residents of the development and adjacent neighborhoods. In this case, the proposed commercial use consists of approximately 2,300 square feet in a mixed use building at the center of the development. The design of the mixed use building matches the rest of the development, and would consist of uses allowed in Neighborhood Commercial zones, such as commercial recreation, eating and drinking establishments, office uses, and personal service- or sales -oriented retail, among others. Because this is not a commercial development, the mixed use building will be evaluated using multi -family site development standards rather than CN-1 site development standards. Staff will ensure the mixed use building complies with all applicable standards during site plan review. Commercial Parking: The applicant is requesting to reduce the minimum off-street parking requirement for the neighborhood commercial use from 9 spaces to 7 spaces. This is allowed where it avoids development on or near regulated sensitive areas pursuant to 14-3A-4E-4. In this case, the off-street parking for the mixed use building is split between a 9-space surface lot and a 20-space underground garage. The required parking for the building is 31 spaces (9 for the commercial use and 22 for senior apartments). The only area where additional parking could be provided is to the north, which is the location of the construction boundary used to protect sensitive areas. Staff believes this parking reduction is warranted because it protects those sensitive features and because the commercial use is also served by diagonal on -street parking that does not count towards this minimum. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The Northwest Planning District does not have a district plan, so the proposed development is reviewed using the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan. 8 The Future Land Use Map of 1C2030 identifies the subject property as appropriate for residential development at a density of 2-8 dwelling units per acre. The applicant proposes a density of 3.7 dwelling units per net acre which is consistent with the vision in the plan, even when the additional density provided by the assisted living facilities is included. IC2030 encourages a diversity of housing options in all neighborhoods and compact, efficient development that is contiguous and connected to existing neighborhoods. The proposed development implements these goals by focusing on one of the few remaining undeveloped in - fill parcels in Iowa City. In addition, it provides a full range of housing types, including single- family homes, duplexes, townhomes, multi -family units, and assisted group living. The Comprehensive Plan also encourages pedestrian -oriented development and attractive and functional streetscapes that make it safe, convenient, and comfortable to walk. The proposed plan includes sidewalks along all proposed streets and connects into the broader pedestrian network along Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Boulevard. Furthermore, the centrally located clubhouse and commercial uses provide destinations within walking distance of homes. With regards to street connectivity, the proposed development extends streets to create a coherent network for the southern portion of the site, though connectivity on the northern portion of the site is limited due to sensitive areas and existing neighborhood constraints. Specifically, connecting to other existing neighborhoods is not possible due to the layout of neighborhoods to the east and north, and the location of sensitive features on the property justify the use of cul- de-sacs though the plan generally discourages their use. Meanwhile, the proposed stub street to the east maintains the possibility for a future connection should the eastern portion of the St. Andrew's property develop. The proposed layout of the development also helps preserve the property's natural areas which aligns with goals related to protection of sensitive features. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject property contains regulated wetlands, a stream corridor, slopes, and woodlands. The applicant has submitted a Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan as part of the OPD rezoning. Due to the proposed disturbance of the wetland buffers, a Level II Sensitive Areas Review is required. Jurisdictional Wetlands: The subject property contains an existing wetland of approximately 0.04 acres to the northwest (see Attachment 6). No impacts are proposed to the existing wetlands. However, the City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance requires a 100-foot buffer to be maintained between a regulated wetland and any development activity (14-51-6E-1). The Ordinance allows a 50-foot buffer reduction for the wetland according to 14-51-6E-3a of the City Code where applicable standards are met as demonstrated by a wetland specialist. The applicant has requested a 50-foot buffer reduction, and a wetland specialist determined that all standards of 14- 5I-6E-3a are met. Staff has reviewed the full wetland report and concurs with the findings. Stream Corridors: The subject property contains the Cardinal Creek stream corridor on the northern portion of the property. The stream corridor requires a 30-foot wide stream corridor (spanning both sides of the stream) and 50-foot wide stream corridor buffer on each side of the stream. The stream corridor is situated far enough away from the proposed construction limits that the stream corridor will not be impacted, so these standards are met. Regulated Slopes: The subject property contains steep, critical, and protected slopes. The impacts to these slopes are outlined in Table 1 on the next page. Approximately 30.7 percent of critical slopes are proposed to be impacted, which is below the 35 percent threshold of critical slopes that may be impacted per the Sensitive Areas Ordinance. 9 Table 1 — Summary of Regulated Slopes Slopes Disturbed Preserved Total Square Feet Percent Square Feet Percent Square Feet Percent Steep 297,918 91.9% 26,336 8.1% 324,254 100.0% Critical 73,523 30.7% 166,274 69.3% 239,797 100.0% Protected 0 0.0% 39,523 100.0% 39,523 100.0% Wooded Areas — The subject property has approximately 6.49 acres of woodlands. The preliminary SADP shows that the development would disturb 1.24 acres (19.1 %) of woodlands. An additional 1.87 acres (28.7%) will riot be impacted within the 50-foot woodland buffer, but this area does riot count towards preserved woodlands. The disturbed woodlands and buffer area total 3.11 acres (47.9%), leaving roughly 3.38 acres (52.1 %) unimpacted. This is above the 50 percent of woodlands required to be retained in the Sensitive Areas Ordinance. Table 2 summarizes these findings. Table 2 — Summary of Woodlands Square Feet Acres Percent Disturbed 54,039 1.24 19.1% Buffer Area 81,247 1.87 28.7% Preserved 147,338 3.38 52.1% Total 282,624 6.49 100.0% Archaeological Sites — A Phase I Archaeological Survey was completed by the Office of the State Archaeologist on July 21, 2022. No artifacts or archaeological features were identified in the survey and no further archaeological work is recommended. Neighborhood Open Space: According to section 14-5K of the City code, dedication of public open space or fee in lieu of land dedication is addressed at the time of final platting for residential subdivisions. Based on the 31.2 acres of RS-8 zoning, the developer would be required to dedicate approximately 1.08 acres to the City or pay a fee in -lieu of land dedication. The applicant has requested to pay a fee in -lieu of a public open space dedication, which is estimated at approximately $140,467 based on a recent appraisal. Storm Water Management: The applicant intends to provide stormwater detention in an underslab detention system, to be engineered at the time of the Preliminary Plat. The plan shows a proposed wet stormwater retention basin south of the extension of Gathering Place Lane, and another stormwater retention basin northeast of the intersection of Camp Cardinal Road and Gathering Place Lane. Public Works must approve any stormwater management plan as part of platting process. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ22-0012, a proposal to rezone approximately 31.2 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPDIRS-8) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading 10 Camp Cardinal Road to City standards from Gathering Place Lane to the future extension of Deer Creek Road in accordance with 15-3-2 of the Iowa City Code. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. 2. In the event Owner desires to construct on -street angled parking, at the time of final platting, Owner shall execute an agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney obligating the Owner to maintain such spaces. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location & Rezoning Maps 2. Rezoning Exhibit 3. Preliminary Planned Development Overlay and Sensitive Areas Development Plan 4. Preliminary Building Elevations 5. Summary Report for Good Neighbor Meeting 6. Wetlands Delineation Map Approved by: . St+"- -D-anielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services 0.15 Miles 0 0.04 0.07 I I DER CREEK RD REZ22-0012 Gathering Place Development ■ ■ ■ 44 ■ ■ it 0... 4 • ■ ■ ■ • ■ • ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • • ■ 7 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ a • ■ • ■ ■ ■ • • • • • ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■A■ ■ ■ • 1 • ■ • • ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ An application submitted by Welch Design and Development on behalf of Western Home Independent Living Services, Inc. for a rezoning of approximately 31 acres of property located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane for a senior living community from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Overlay development (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Overlay Development (OPD/RS-8). CIl Y OF IOWA CI I Y Prepared By: Emani Brinkman Date Prepared: August 2022 5uTTERNUT LN ACORN Crr - 0 0.04 0.07 0.15 Miles I I 1 I �." AMii ���� Ain �.At1 i. ikWinnniMlninn ID -RP mrr. k. _. A.. R EEK RD REZ22-0012 Gathering Place Development • kin GATHERING PLAG' - RM12 ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ CIIY OF IOwA CI I Y Prepared By: Emani Brinkman Date Prepared: August 2022 .=s 7 ■��w nni ID-RS An application submitted by Welch Design and Development on behalf of Western Home Independent Living Services, Inc. for a rezoning of approximately 31 acres of property located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane for a senior living community from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Overlay development (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Overlay Development (OPD/RS-8). SNp.GBARK CT • r —i Wnn we.u.T-TE_RNLI:TL IN BUTS .ling irrAinn /rin• AMINWPAI nin /in" —Wi n �� n WI , COR CT-Y r-��/rn �. - 1. — z ��z ��� — . rn Ii�� — l. �>_�� In — -a "i0r 1M. CAM, CARDINAL POINTE / \-- SOUTH PART MO ZONING: OPO RS-5 CARDINAL HEIGHTS ZONING: OPD / R11-12 w.�UPEDER c9 p,0 \ CARDINAL HEIGHTS ZONING: OPD / 1114-12 CARDINAL RIDGE PART TWO ZONING: ORD RS-5 AUDITOR'S PARCEL 99051 BK41 PG114 ZONING: ID-R5 I �1. 1` VZONING: 10-R5 I � AUDITOR'S\ PARCEL 99051 BK41 PG114 ZONING: ID-RS 301 CAMP CARDINAL RD 1 �I• .. ',.1 \\` ZONING: OPO / CC-2 ' ql• I \ Z j \\\\ 7 U 1. CARDINAL VILLAS CONDOMINIUMS \ ZONING: RM-12 1. OUTLOT A 5T ANDREW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH PART ONE BK60 PG138 ZONING: OPD / R5-5 AUDTOR'S PARCEL 95063 BK35 PG220 PARCEL "A" 3120 Ac 1,359,065 SF I. CAMP CARDINAL BLVD ZONING: ID-R5 ST ANDREW PRESBYIERI4N CHURCH - PART DNE ZONING: DPD / R5-5 J\ ORDINAL RIDGE Y PART ONE ZONING: DPD RS-5 i y J I re' TYJ WALNUT RIDGE ONING: OPO / RR-1 \ iT \ AUDITORS PARCEL 2012061 BK57 PGB \\\ ZONING: ID-R5 WALNUT RIDGE ZONING: OPO / WALNUT RIDGE ZONING: OPD / RR-✓ Lig L. — ..-..—._a.. WALNUT RIDGE ZONING: / \ 0P0 / RR/ / � I I \ 1-_-./.. f..--' C REZONING EXHIBIT WESTERN HOME GPD OF IOWA CITY IOWA CITY, IOWA LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "A" BEING PART OF: AUDITOR'S PARCEL 95063 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 35, PAGE 220 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE SOUTHWEST IA OF THE NORTHWEST FRACTIONAL IA AND THE NORTHWEST IA OF THE SOUTHWEST FRACTIONAL IA OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH z.M., CITY OF IOWA CITY, DCHN50N COUNTY, IOWA. AND OUTLOT A CF ST. ANDREW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH - PART ONE, AS RECORDED IN BOOK 60, PAGE 138 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. EXCEPT AUDITOR'S PARCEL 99051 A5 RECORDING BOOK 41, PAGE 114, OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, IN THE SOUTHWEST 'A OF THE NORTHWEST FRACTIONAL 'A AND THE NORTHWEST 'A CF THE SOUTHWEST FRACTIONAL 'A OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5' P.M., CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 31.20 ACRES AND 15 SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ZONING INFORMATION OIRRENT ZONING: ID-R5 & OPD 1 R5-5 PROPOSED ZONING OPD 1 R5-B APPLICANT INFORMATION 'ROPERTY OWNER WESTERN HCME INDEPENDENT _DING SERVICE, INC 5703 CARAWAY LANE CEDAR FALLS, IA 50613 ST ANDREW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 140 GATHERING PLACE LANE IOWA CITY, IA 52246 DEVELOPER WESTERN HCME SERVICES, INC 5703 CARAWAY LANE CEDAR FALLS, IA 50613 CVIL ENGINEER WELCH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MICHAEL 3. WELCH, PE '0 BOX 679 NORTH LIBERTY, IA 52317 (319) 214-7501 welch design+development WESTERN HOME INDEPENDENT _IVING SERVICE, INC. WESTERN HOME GPD OF IOWA CITY !EWS101. LC. REV GESSRIPTION OTY SUBMITTAL JN GATE 041.9.22 REZONING EXHIBIT 01�—�— l5�0 vs �300 ,czr z zn wxe Ev .�moxxO: mEov..HE 09-14-2022 PAGE 1 T-dGVSLt'°upT.> U 9719M 1 NYId 1N3Wd013A30 SV3aV 3ALIISN3S 8 AV1N3A01N3Wd013A30 03NNV1d A0YNIWn3ad - S3dOlS 03LV11 3N .1.1.4115 2['S(-21 ZETRZT S1-60 31M 601Vt11W nsAID BM 1r11w0i6 A1D PM 1rLL1NNP6IUD IM 1V111Wans ALD NOad(tlh30 witiommi A113 VMOI dO Od0 314OH Na31S3M .3011.1(011.1 'ONI'S301AN3S 9NIA11 1N3aN3d30NI3WOH Na3153M3N111 11etUd01eAeP1U8!507 — LPI OM 41110S - Wald 1d33NO3 Sda0S 1-1190N - N V 1d 1433N07 b-d005 NVld1d37Nm Edays SONV1000M ZdOVS s3dOlS 031011939 1-d0VS 31111N133H5 rads X30NI133HS 105E+10I61E1 CTR5 VI'AIN3911 I41110N 6L9 609 Od 3d'9013M T13VHDIW 1N3Wd013A30 017899190 N013M 933NISN31IAD ET905 VI'STIV9 11V033 31110 AYMYdtO EOLS 3NI'533IA8S 31,10H N931.53M Z96E-199 (61E) 06RS VI 'A170 1/N01 E014 N019NI13063 BOE D9013A319 SH3N19Vd VOWS 113d013A30 9%RS VIAi17 VM01 3591331080979311119061 H79OH7 Nv013119539d M311CNV 15 £T906 tlf'S11Vd NY(133 3NV7 AVMV9117 EOLS 7N1'33IA9359NIAil 1N30N3d30M 3WOH N93IS3M 113NMO ALN3d011d N OI1YW2IOd N I IN VOIlddtl ,0N393135013031VII19311 33[nBe Ba 5iems a iuBtme 3H101513rdNi 0.91.3.1 EseE 3.15031.1.10.11,1.01 52515 modewmMl01 B6rw ce us.* re awm lis) Vila zm e;:.Pu 59[88 fi15851 (is) vim 3d01s33u 1r101 e O :S3d01S 0313310ad :535010 103W03 0317Vd141 :835015 5331S 03179d141 'ONLLLVId lONI3 d0 3WLL lV 1N3WAVd .3317 NI 33i. 1/1/113W 39111M SW3W3310039 30Vd5 N34000011909691311 'M3IA311 939V 3AWSN351113A31 V 03UIn039 11IM L3ii09 a9YN3M 039N039 3H1d0 901170039 39/4 '535015 107LU37 3111 40 %S£ 969159713Vd W111IM S1N3BBA09d11719Od 91VOOSSY a1I1N3Wd013n30 0350d011d 3HL S31ON NOI1vDIlddv VMOI 1J�IIJ VMOI kLIJ VMOI J O adD 114OH Ni91SJM NV1d 1N01Ald01]A]4 SValV ]AIIISN]S GNV Jl` Td]A0 1NDWdO1 ADa GONNV1d K IVNIWI1ald La U1n1aluna 129 I �du 1 1 —z- 1D LnNH3une I� £b£PaL I`{l -tom 13 1n N8311119 SSD 10 )181/90VH5 DC 10 )I60809HS 09 7 .00T = .T 3N0 lava 30019 1VN10NYD OML 131Vd 30019 10610NV3 3N0 ltltld — HONfH3 NVR131A9530d 110330NY 15 \ 1'1 SWf INIINOON01 S9T1IA 11MI061tl0 e j`� j'O�N33a7 a330 \ liIIIIIIlIIIIII +110d 1.01E1 10066 1309dd s,a0llanY — ma3i19NV3015A5 90019307 HMid15 AE a Hod 06319 3 1410d I>N9 10066 1309Vd S,N01100V S1H013H 1Vn1a6V3 OM1 laud 5111013H 300111 1051021V3 11M100YD -1 0M1 `laud Htn05 31NIDd 1vn1aa73 fi 09 Z-davS 7Z0Z31-ZI I J "n "w,l SZOI NV1d 1N3Wd013A30 SV3iltl 3ALIISN3S AVIH]AO.N3Wd013A30 03410V1d •Wn3ad • SaNV113MIsaNV1a0DM 22i1-21 i 2-11-1511I 60 31Y0 b� "n.wweM1S AID fY1Y.WN9f6ALD 21 Y3LlWBOS AIIO f T/111WOrS AM 1.1117110 1nnMe A110 VMOI dO Od9 314OH N113LS3M .3011.110.1 •ONI•S301AN3S SNIAI1 IN30N3d30NI3WOH 1031S3M 1J2Iud019Aep. u61S2p Lp eM SC NV11112 9 SaNV1000M :0N3931 353141O N$15300111130 '03a013A30 104 T 1/11YN15Y3w 3a015-NM00.11010'1110. 911HLL0owMoL110. 11 adS .1115u3M Yaw N061JIIWSNOJ 9NON 33411 ALS DOM. 'SJLLL NIOWOVJ ammo. CNN C N0LL11133tl 1131A191119111011VD. NO1.1110 NI TMOLLIOOY YD111033N 0NY1131.101 MEM '039-15-r1 N0L0351[N 0NY03M 3N1 MOM YLi06 30 PS 114LL5531 ON 11,1011014 01. AN 010.1. 38 111M axe, M 3. FILM O3IYWSSY1.1110111 SONV1J.3M 19Y310 NH13B11 Y13N021.3000A11301100131 NAME n91e2 6[e1e SrF BF 6Fe'SZ 2181 FiY6 Z7 61f'L n Gs) Yaw NOLLY I SsTaN3 03AY138 LS1108A30 SONVla00M 0317VdWI l:l 1n N213111a SSD 17 JIHYBOVHS DC hOHS 09 I 1 —we e_ • AOT = .1 OM a1 ooi N B 3N0 1>JVd 30013 1VNIO9V0 0651 1;IVd 30019 1V11109,10 1\ \ \ SMNNINOONOO SVlllh lYNI0aV0 1 3N0 121tld — HOafH3 NVI1J31A9S3?Jd M330NV JS +ll0d L121 10066 1309Vd s,a011anv 3Ia3111WY331S AS 5 f ¥OOIYtl0 WY3115 AE OMl 13Yd SIH013H 30013 16010063 16010000 J / ' rEOM laVd H1n05 31NIDd 1VN100V0, CARDINAL 'POINTE SOL0.H PART, TWO CARDINAL HEIGHTS CARDINAL HEIGHTS CARDINAL HEIGHTS 301 CAMP 1 CARDINAL,' RD CARDINAL RIDGE PART TWO AUDITOR'S PARCEL 99051 BK4-1 PG114 30' Mal COPA100R 915TREAM&IiER AUDITOR'S PARCEL 99051 BK41 PG114 1111 CARDINAL VILLAS CONDOMINIUMS \q\\. 25ORr EDITAC 16BEDS•NEMORYC45E 16003• AS¢MEDIA1IL 20 INTERIOR RIMING STALLS CARDINAL RIDGE PART 1W0 NL7NG 61 OLBKWSE 16 RE50BNTIAI UN15 35TOAIES ST ANDREW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — PART ONE 1 COINECTTO MISTING WATER LINE YmE 1^ = 100' CARDINAL RIDGE PART ONE T ti I 1. PRNATEWATER MAIN LOOP AND 2O FISSION j 11 e III lil 1 1 1 7 I L..\ 60 SHAGBARK CT IMAGINARY LOTLI E SMONN P)R 20NA'G COMPLIANCE (TYPICAL) 70 SHAGBARK CT PULING PIPELINE EASBENTBr391 PG2413 PARKING & TRAFFIC DATA GENERAL SITE DATA: OPP-STREET PERLMO REQUIREMENTS U10T COUNT: GROG LIVING, MEMORY CARE IPER 3 BEDS 31 BEDS 11 STALLS COUNT AREA TOTAL 1 PER EACH STAFF 16 STAFF 16 STALLS SINGIEFW4ILY UNITS 35 1,615 SF 92,825 SF SUBTOTAL 27 STALLS DUREX UNITS B ;ma SF WOO SF CLUBHOUSE CONDO WILDING EU 14,150 SF MULTI.FMAILY PI • INDEPENDENT ELDER I PER UNIT 16 UNITS 16 STALLS TWO -BEDROOM RIOTS B THREE6133RO13M UNITS B MULTSFAMILY 82 ATTACHED CONDO (BUILDING RI) 14,150 SF INDEPENDENT FILLER IPER UNIT 22 UNITS 22 STALLS TVOOEDROOM UNITS 11 COMMERCIAL CAN TO WRAC 1 PER 250 SF 2320 SF 9 STALLS THMEBEDROOM UNITS 11 SUBTOTAL 31 STALLS TOWMBTKSE UNITS 20 1,220 5F 24,400 SF TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 74 STALLS MEMORY URE2 ASSISTED WING BEDS 32 1T.400 SF TOTAL 133 190,775 5F OPF-STREET PARKING PROVIDED GROUP LIVING • MEMORY CA. SITE INTERIM 20 STALLS PAVBIBLT AEA(ESCLUDEE CARP CARDINAL RD) I113,600 SF SCTERIOR 12 STALLS TOTAL BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENT 324,375 SF SUBTOTAL 32 STALLS TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 1,359,180 5F NET LAND AREA FREE OF BUILDINGS, PARKING DRIVES 801205 SF MULTPFAMILY SITES 58.9 44 BUILDING NI INTERIOR 20 STALLS LOT AREA (AC (ACRES) BUILDING N2 INTERIOR 20 STALLS MIDROR3 FARM 95063 2692 (SEE WAIVER REQUEST A3) O(IERIOR 9STALS OUTLET A-ST ANDREWS 4.38 SUBTOTAL 29 5TAL15 TOTAL 31.20 TOTAL PARKING PROYIDEO• el STALLS RIGHT-0,64T(LOT A) 4.3e • DOES NOT INCLUDE STREET PARKING NET ACREAGE BICYCLE PARKING TO BE PROVIDED WIMIN THE PARKING STRUCTURES UNITS Y ACRE OR ,-,-'-''�' TRAFFIC PROIECCOM(NII 11TH EDITION): 00515TS, LIVING BED = WAIT AT INTERSECTION OF DEER OWE ROW AND GATHERING PIKE UNE HO5INGTYPF TRIPS PER 4.31 N0. UN[35 DAILY TRIPS COMMERCIAL USES OPEN TO PUBLIC \ SHIIgt-SIN2IE-FMLOY^ 451 35 151 WEST CONDO BUILDING 2,320 SF \ SENIOR -WPM' 4.31 8 35 LIB -MARL-PANTRm.E Y 321 38 ALL LEES MOST MEET OKI STANDARDS TOTAL - SENIOR DUPLEX UNITS ARE 00aRITED AS •DETPCNED. RS-8 SASE rOnE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS SLS REQUESTWAIVERS LOT AREA,TM MINU REQUESTED M 5,0005E 1. REQU11 A REDUCTION FOR THE REAR SETRACNASSOCIATEDWITH UNIT 9 FROM 20 FEET TO LOT WIDTH 4S FEET 16 FEET. LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET --\1\` I REQUEST ANEOUCOOR FOR THE FRONT SETBACK ON CIES DE SAC FROM 25 FEET TO 15 FEET SETBACKS AND WAIVE REQUIREMENT FOR UNITS TO RE SET 304 ABOVE ADMCENT PUBLIC SIDEWALK FRONT 15 FEET CIXGIRUCTIURNAROUND I-----c AN05IUB PAVBBR TO 50WN. MIN 39'PAO. Al EDGE (*PAVEMENT 35$•(143A41-1A14)) TO MA2NI0N AC(ESSMILIY. NOTE THAT A DRIVEWAY OF AT LEAST 299 GARAGE DOOR 25 FEET BUTTERNUT CT \ WILL STILL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH UNIT ON THE CUL DE SAL 510E 5FEET 3. REQUPSF A REDULTION(S TWO REQUIRED ONIMERCUL MONO SPACES FOR EXTERIOR REAR• 20 FEE PARKINGFORBUIDINGP2 DUE TO PROXIMITY TO SFIAIW TAREAS(143A4E4) ' REQUEST IV REAR SETBACK FOR UNIT 9. P.EQU.T AN INCREASE IXTHE MAXIMUML40WILDING HEIGHT FROM 39 FOR TO 45' FOR WRUNG NI AND BUILDING F2 TO ADORES SITE TOPOIROPFN(GRADE PLANE CALCULATION) MULTI•FAMttY ZONE DIMENSUNIAL STANDARDS AND ROOFTOP FEATURES. SETK0CM £ REQUEST A REDUCTION FOR THE FONT SETBACK ASSOCIATED WM1 TOWNHO4ESYIIF, FRONT 20 FEET HULRFMIILV BUILDINGS FROM 20 FEET 10 ]S FEET TO MAIN CONSISTENT WITH OTHER SIDE lO FEEL K au"F.FAMRY HOMES MUMTIE DEVELOPMENT FRONT 20 FEEL __BOLDINGET SEPARATION 20 FEET A NO FS: 1. ALLINGRSTREETS QUIARE MNTS IC • L PARKING REQUIREMENTS WAA£SUMEMES T APE LOCATED 3. ALIT URB ID !ADORE. PEAK IENTLY MAR E BE THE CURB WITHIN RUBLL[RIGNT OFWAY CORM T THE IDl ADORERWNERSENRY MAM'EDONTHFN SNONR roER lOWMATR SHA.I RE LLSAREIN F FOR SALON RFPKNA AT THE ANGLED REFER TPMRIET EYEN AN 7ULLSAEM 0IENRLRRIORT-0FWAY 343 s. REFER TO SHEETS SADP4 AND SADPS MN LOT DIMENSIONS FOR THE"MAONMY LOT LIIIFS BUTTERNUT CT REQUIRED EN NANN1w STAFF BUTTERNUT CT \. LEGEND: UNIT TYPES SINGIEPAEIILY CONDO CUPLEI, CNCO(2UNITS) _ MRT141NIT CONDO _ TOWNHm1E _ COTTAGES: MEMORY CARE _ RROTECTED SLOPE(a 4046) �I PROTECTED SLOPE BUFFER FER ID IIIIIIIIII CON5I9UCTION MA OMIT 27.02 4.9 welch design.developrnerrt WESTERN HOME INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES, INC. WESTERN HOME GPD OF IOWA CITY CRY SUBMITTAL AL CITY SUBMITTAL A2 CITY SUBMITTAL Al CRY SUBMITTAL N9 09-1422 11-15-22 120522 12-15-22 ' '' ' 'CONCEPT PLAN - PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY & SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRPJECr 1025 ARDWROI 12-15-2022 SADP-3 .1 lam DEERCEK AD e_. ST ANDREW PRGRttERIAN CHIIRr.H - PART ONF CARDINAL RIDGE I / EX6fWG PEIJNE. PART ORE EASENE9.391041 welch design. development µ^FROM WESTERN HOME GPD OF IOWA CITY sin un66A CONCEPT PLAN NORTH • PRELIMINAR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY & SENSIINE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1025 12-LS2022 BUIL16161 It2 ' NEIGH80.61000 COMMERCIAL :f AND 22 0E510E011AL UNLTS, STNOFS, L4. If MAIN LEVEL FEE,.>T24.S0 LOITER LEVEL 5FE - 762.50 7' ST ANDREW PRESBITERIAN CHURCH — PART ONE • k e1 0 2s 50 n INB LEGEND: UNIT W S: 51103£cM1RY 064400 OMB, 074160 MULTLUNTT CONDO 70441010.16 COTAGFS: MEMORY CUTE CONSIRIKOON AREA UNIT r I 11 welch design .development a NESTERN HOME INDEPENDENT LIVING SERVICES, INC. PRO WESTERN HOME GPD OF IOWA CITY 5UBM C[IY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMIT.AL CITY SUBMITTAL A4 111422 10S-x2 1,0}22 12-15-22 CONCEPT PLAN SOUTH • PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY & SENSTIIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1025 WELCH 12-15-2022 SADP-5 r 1 PLANT SCHEDULE LOCATED ON SHEET L-02 7 - ,• I 1 ' '\ r\ \ • .,,\;\.. \! V \ \ , . \ \ \` `•. ;/'• \ . \ \ • \ \ y' \ ., J Mira _ Landscaping Plan is subject to Zoning Code standards which will be reviewed with the site plan. The plan shown he a concept and is subject to change in compliance with those standards. 0 SO 75 l00 07 PROVIDED A. MN HUM R9DUIREME11715: IV OF AT LEASTO IIETREE ToRZELF0DIFETIVII RED I/ If11r"•7 1 I,, I welch I r I I — design.development 1 1!1 11 c"'WESTERN HOME INDEPENDENT 1 • 1 / 1 / / ' r ' IVING SERVICES, INC. rill,E: WESTERN HOME GPO t• J REV SeCIRIPTIC1,1 att SLIMITTPL Jtt fir( ABMITTPL J9 att SLIMITTPL as DATE 0314II 1l-l9II 12-osa ID 15II CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN .evl o25 ssal EH " ILA Design �� AL..oi �C 12-15-2022 PRO POSE0 SMALL 1.010110116TREE1 -/ / % \ ( 00,50a 101 \ 1 1 /.. w•[r 1E_ S/0Tz""' wniroxoueco ramucmrry vrtererrcorsr.crnr owmw Ert ` `\ \.,.,\,�, 11.0ELSIREETTLEE wo.,�Tm ... „P.P. TCH'LINE:, L-01 ...\'. -� 7T' L02' v- Malt WEE 011011110401111011.007•011 APB 0011105.01 GOB 100 0010 OPP ea COP CCT ea COX Ell COS ea MOM LBN ea LIT ea 11011 N SO CMS PILL PBS 110.1110005. CPC GBC ea Ott CCM TRIM 01 TM. ea GOT mom. mums nos Lamm CCP ea CCM w77 ea MP 0000 NP 0010118110.10. CCS ▪ CO TO ABG SPO CAS ea P AM am ea P OE 10110 1101210010006010.11/10101 Gee COP SBO CAB PPP S4P PAC MAO JXP Landscaping Plan is subject to Zoning Code standards which will be reviewed with the site plan. The plan shown here is a concept and is subject to change in compliance with those standards. welch design+development c""'WESTERN HOME INDEPENDENT _IVING SERVICES, INC. •�c�J�E WESTERN HOME GPO OF IOWA CITY REV DATE aTY SUBMITTAL JM 041422 A att9-NrIITTPL JR ll-l9II C1TY 9_&"OTTAL 44 12-04II a-N.4417ALPa CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN 1025 rtwWELCH 12-15-2022 AL-02 'Re ..... ,,,,, ------- ay. ... ...................................................... ............................ ILA Design F441tEE, welch design.development ''EIVESTERN HOME INDEPENDENT _IVING SERVICES, INC. WESTERN HOME GPD OF IOWA CITY MIEMFLW: REV DffERIPTICI4 DATE arr SUBMITTAL #1. 041422 arr 9_131ARTAL. 141,22 DTY SUBMITTAL 44 12-0422 a-N.4417AL.. 12-1422 CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS 1025• WELCH L-03 C 12-15-2022 a uvima l NING BEDROCIA? ■ BEDROOM W.I.C. 2 HA BATH 1 STORNI RM MCCH KITCHEN MUD RM FOYER GARAGE 2 IEROON YN BASEMENT. OMAAEM6 i An UTAAC IIBY -IX/1/Si SsswEST .1MS" LIVING rDINING IGTCHEN BEDROOM BEDROOM3 HALL BEDROOM 1 1 BATH I BATII 2 STORM FOYER MUD RM. GARAGE 3 BEDROOM. NO BASEMENT. FIRSTFLODH 1 A WM:ow. Nova DShoemaker Haaland w+ vshoenokerha4aulcan WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -SINGLE FAMILY PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SINGLE FAMILY FLOOR PLANS A101 f Teo' 12112 Qh-8-T_O1118'.P.-GARAGE FIRST FLOOR 1 LOWER_LEVEL -10'-1 1/2' T.O.P-0'.- 12712 18' T8'.O.P11/8'.-GARAGE - ;IRST FLOOR 0" 1r--10'-1 LOWER LEVEL I/O' r T8.0-12112 T.O.P.-GARAGE . LO�10' W-ER1112" LEVEL T.O.P.0"-12/12 1C- T.O.11/8P.-GARAGE r FIRST FLOOR 0'-0' LOWER11/2 LEVEL 10'- m L 12-12 Sack Elevation -Walkout \ \ Shed -Back Elevation -Walkouts 1/a' a 1,0" Nlpped.ack Elevation -Walkout 10 118-= 12-12Back Elavaton �, 1/W=1'-0 Shetl-Back Elevation 8 HippeO-Back Elevation 8 Dulcl-Beek Elevation 11 1/0"=1.-0' T.O.P.-12/12 18-0'1 12-12 F/onl Elevation 2 1/8" PvlVRI0RPMI6/P8 1. 3MaF5 WRDILAPPEDallEM BOARD MINS I••031.05URF 2. 2.172. CEMENT WARD TM. TYPICAL 3. WHIM FIBER CEMFR WALL PAM;1.91EN.3/ 3. ALUMINUM GAD moo unND0Vfa Hipped -Front Eleva8m 8 DultlnFronl Elevation T.O.P.-12/I2 6'-0' T.O.P.-GARAGE FIRST FLOOR T.O.P. -12/12 RV-0' • T.O.P.-GARAGE — n•-i iflt••J/ WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -SINGLE FAMILY FIRST FLOOR iuie -0 T.O.P.-t21f2 PRELIMINARY T.0.P.-GARAGE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SINGLE FAMILY ELEVATIONS A201 Area PIon.Op4on 1 IA, 3132'= 1,0. Area Plan-Optlon 2 3fl2• = r-cP L F N. \ = PATO LIVING KITCHEN I DINING II I UNIT A FOYER BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM a� HALL BEDROOM 1 N I C BATH 1 BEOR00N1 LAUNDRY i GARAGE BEDROOM 2 IC mmi HALL BEDROOM 3 POP BEDROOM 'I BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM LAUNDRY MECH. GARAGE GARAGE LAUNDRY MECH LIVING KITCHEN/DINING FOYER UNIT B FIRST FLOOR-OPTICN UNIT B I• LIVING KITCHEN I DINING FOYER BEDROOM BEDROOM HALL BEDROOM BATH 1 AA� GARAGE FIRST FLOOR-OPTION2 ,2 JShoemaker �j� Haaland ww,sshcemaker-hthulam WESTERN HOMES: GATHERING PLACE -DUPLEX PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FLOOR PLANS -OPTIONS 1&2 A101 WPLEX ELEIIB"VATION leme slim/ Lc - DUPLEX FLOOR PLAN 1!B" =1.-0' �l DUPLEX ELEVATION Z, 118•• =1•-0. Aoemaker Haalan www. emaker-had n, ,u� .PE,RCII HFC HART-FREDERICKS CONSULTANTS PC WESTERN HOMES:GATHERING PLACE - DUPLEX PRERLIMINARY DUPLEX A201 BEDROOM 1 BATH 1 MECH. GARAGE FOYER FIRSTFLOOR ELEVATIONS BATHROOM BEDROOM 2 W.I.CLOSET KITCHENILIVINGIDINING r0 SECOND FLOOR i THIRD FLOOR 1 I, 1 u 1 1 1 NOTE: BULDING IS SUBJECT TO MULTI -FAMILY SITE DEVELOPEMENT STANDARDS WHICH WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE SITEPLAN. THE BUILDING SHOWN HERE IS A CONCEPT AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE STANDARDS. i 15201111 WESTERN HOMES - GATHERING PLACE - TOWNHOMES PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FLOOR PLAN A101 3 4 5 6 7 8 I,) 13 STORAGE 1134 SF 411S SF PARKING 9517 SF CIRCULATION e_+ 1843 SF Rentable Area Legend CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE RENT AREA-PARKINO cf,, NOTE: BULDING IS SUBJECT TO MULTI -FAMILY SITE DEVELOPEMENT STANDARDS WHICH WILL BE REVIEWED WITH \• G Moemaker Haaland wlnv 3hcenlaker- a1 can WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT D BLDG. 1 B PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION rIgAlr THE SITEPLAN. THE BUILDING SHOWN HERE IS A CONCEPT AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE AREA PLAN - STANDARDS. PARKING A101 OFFICE 13E6 SF 1 S 9 10 11 . 12 13 I 1 OUTDOOR SEATING Olt 64565F .TROOMS 551 5F MECH RENS LOCKER ROOM MEN WOMEN MECN. STAIR fY ELEVATOR .LOBBY CIRCULATION 963 5F ENTRY FOYER 1 ■ r r Rentable Area Legend CAFE C6FE :667 SF CIRCULATION GYM OUTDOOR SEATING 1 f 1 OFFICE RESTROOMS WONENS LOCKER ROOM ELEVATOR LOBBY STAIR-2P CIRCULATION 9635F ENTRY FOYER 2 11 RENT AREA -PUBLIC 1 G F E D2 D B ' A a�.DShoemaker �j� Haaland ww,sshremaker-hthul can WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 1 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN -PUBLIC Al 02 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 BEDROOM 1 BATH 1 = BEDROOM 211 BALCONY C BALCONY D BEDROOM 1 BATH 2 I0L BEDROOM 2 BATH 1 BEDROOM BALCONY A •„ i APT.A 1444 SF, D KITCHEN ! LIVING DINING BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1 APT. D KITCHEN / LIVING 10265E 2 DINING BATH 2 STAIR .11 - MECH. u BATH 1 MECH. n MECH MECH. BEDROOM1 11 �1 J W.I.C. BATH 1 BATH 2, BEDROOM 2 MECH APT. A 1444 SF • V1 HEN !DINING `L 11- Y� KITXEN I LIVING 1 DINING CIRCULATOR 1212 SF APT.B 1633 SF APT. B 633 SF BEDROOM3 BALCONY B APT. C1.1 NY APT. D 1026 sr ELEV. Rentable Area Legend APT. A APT. B APT. C APT. D CIRCULATION RENTAREA•APT•TYP. G E D2 D A LENINIVITHEN DShoemaker �j� Haaland w sshoenokerhthulcan WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 1 PROJECTIN NNW PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN -APARTMENTS A103 7! 8; T KITCHFN 258 5F STAIR 1 CIRCULATION 485 SF ELEVELEVATOR. LOBBY ECH ROOF DECK 10 1111 12 13 GATHERING 1631 SF ROOF DECK 1 I 1 R5TROOMS 257 SF CIRGUI AMOR 484 SF ELEVALOeeTOrx ELEV. 2 STAIR 2.0 MECH. Rentable Area Legend lCIRCULATION GATHERING KITCHEN RESTROOMS RENTAREA-GATHERING i1 G F; Ei D2 D A RECORO Moemaker Haaland w shcemaker-hthldcan WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 1 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN -GATHERING A104 Rentable Area Legend CAFE CIRCULATION GYM Rentable Area Legend CIRCULATION GATHERING OFFICE RENT AREA-PUBLIC•1116 2 1/16" =1'-0" RESTROOMS Area Schedule (Reelable) Level Name Area APT-1 APT. A 1444 SF APT-1 APT.0 12215F APT-1 APT. C 1221 SF APT-1 APT.O 1026 SF APT-1 APT.O 10285F APT-1 APT, B 1633 SF APT-1 APT. B 1633 SF APT.1 CIRCULATION 1212 SF APT-1 APT. A 1444 SF GATHERNG KITCHEN 258 SF GATHERING GATHERING 1831 SF GATHERING RESTROOMS 2579F GATHERING CIRCULATION 4855F GATHERING CIRCULATION 484 SF PUBLIC GYM 6458 SF PUBLIC OFFICE 13865F PUBLIC CAFE 1557 SF PUBLIC CIRCULATION 963 SF PUBLIC CIRCULATION 963 SF PUBLIC RESTROOMS 3915F PARKING PARKING 9517 SF PARKING CIRCULATION 406 SF PARKING CIRCULATION 4075F PARKING STORAGE 1134 SF PARKING STORAGE 1843 SF KITCHEN RESTROOMS RENT AREA -GATHERING Copy1y 4. 1l16" =1'-0" is 1» i Rentable Area Legend CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE Rentable Area Legend APT. A APT. B APT. C RENT AREA -PARKING- 1116 1 , 1/16"=1'4Y 0.1.11.10/1111 Shoemaker Haaland wxx 6hcemakerhaaiandcan WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 1 PAISICAS PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APT. D CIRCULATION RENT AREA-APT-TYP.-1/16 1l16"= 110" Apartment -Area Plans Al 05 i i �i r11=ftil Hain nnnn 1 NOTE: BULDING IS SUBJECT TO MULTI -FAMILY SITE DEVELOPEMENT STANDARDS WHICH WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE SITEPLAN. THE BUILDING SHOWN HERE IS A CONCEPT AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE STANDARDS. Front slaver 1 WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 1 ISSUE OAR elAlt PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APARTMENT BLDG. - ELEVATION A201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 II) 13 STORAGE 1134 SF I I: u rw AnoN PARKING 9517 SF CIRCULATION SI, SF ETORAGE 1843 SF Rentable Area Legend CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE NOTE: BULDING IS SUBJECT TO MULTI -FAMILY SITE DEVELOPEMENT STANDARDS WHICH WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE SITEPLAN. THE BUILDING SHOWN HERE IS A CONCEPT AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE STANDARDS. RENT AREA-PARKINGk. • .245 WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT D BLDG. 2 C B PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN - PARKING 54. A101 2 3 InI 4 5 APL 1221 SF ABLE 1353 SF 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 APT.A 435 SF Lf CIBCULATON 1193 SF APT A 1<35 SF STAIR I* ELEVATOR LOBBY -r T Rentable Area Legend APT. A APT. C PUBLIC 2317 SF ATI SF AELE 1353 SF ELEVATOR LOB Y APT. E CIRCULATION PUBLIC STAIR-2P r�7 RENT AREA -PUBLIC VS' -1'ff F D2 D R IOW PaamstrOxrue WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 2 OAR PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN -PUBLIC Al 02 2 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 ;13 BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BALCONY C ■ BALCONY 0 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1 Y ft BATH 1 BEDROOM BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 4 L �I (ATH 2 APT.D 026 F BATH 1 u c O O ,BATH2 NaS ' MECH. KITCHEN I LIVING DINING MECH. 17 BALCONY A KITCHEN f LIVING I DINING BATH 2 MECH. iJ BATH 1 STAIR 1.1 APT.A 14, SF VI !DINING HEN CIRCULATION 1212 SF 6PT. A 1414 SF MECH. [W.I.C. � H BAIN 2 BEDROOM 2 MECH. ,CI KITH LIVING DINING APT. B 1E33 SF APT.B 1633 SF APT. B 63, BEDROOM3 BALCONY B BEM 1.1 BE AEL,Q 1026 SF STAIR 2.1 N. N. G � E D2 D Rentable Area Legend APT. A APT. B APT. C • ■ APT. D L CIRCULATION RENTAREA•APT.TYP. 1, B A NINFITEIR SEEM. NHILIYINITaxam leNkomeNoWna INVENVII WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 2 DENRINNw PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN -APARTMENTS A103 Rentable Area Legend I CIRCULATION GATHERING KITCHEN RESTROOMS RENT AREA -GATHERING WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 2 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION AREA PLAN -GATHERING A104 Rentable Area Legend APT. A APT. C Rentable Area Legend CIRCULATION APT. E 1 • 1 GATHERING ■ CIRCULATION ■ PUBLIC RENT AREA-PUBLIC•1116 2 1716"=1'-0' Area Schedule (Rentable) Level Name Area APT-1 APT. A 1944 SF APT -I APT.0 12215F APT -I APT. 1221 SF APT-1 API 1026 SF APT -I APT. 0 10265F APT -I APT. B 1633 SF APT-1 APT. B 1633 SF APT-1 CIRCULATION 1212 SF APT-1 APT. A 1444 SF GATHERING KITCHEN 258 SF GATHERING GATHERING 18315F GATHERING 'RESTROOMS 257 SF GATHERING CIRCULATION 985 SF GATHERING CIRCULATION 484 SF Not Placed GYM Not Placed Nol Racal OFFICE Not Placed Nol Raced CAFE Not Placed Nol Racetl CIRCULATION Not Placed Nol Raced CIRCULATION Not Placed Nol Raoad RESTROOMS Not Placed PARKING PARKING 9517 SF PARKING CIRCULATION 406 SF PARKING CIRCULATION 407 SF PARKING STORAGE 1134 SF PARKING STORAGE 1843 SF Nol Raced APT. B Nol Rantl PUBLIC PUBLIC 23175F PUBLIC CIRCULATION 11938F PUBLIC APT. E 1353 SF PUBLIC _ APT.E 1353 SF PUBLIC APT.A '14358F PUBLIC APT. A 1435 SF 1 PUBLIC APT. C 1221 SF PUBLIC APT. G 1221 5F KITCHEN RESTROOMS RENT AREA -GATHERING Copy 1 , 4 1118' =11-0' J h l ranaMMIr o is Rentable Area Legend CIRCULATION PARKING STORAGE RENT AREA-PARHING- 1116 1 , 1l16" =1'-0' • I rit Rentable Area Legend APT. A APT. B APT. C 0.1101.1...1.20110 WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 2 OAR PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APT. D CIRCULATION RENT AREA-APT-TYP.-1716 3 1116-= 1' 0. Apartment -Area Plans Al 05 �1 1 1 11 11=1=1= =I= Mil III rin=L-ril Iffn hn nnnn 'uji' 1 NOTE: BULDING IS SUBJECT TO MULTI -FAMILY SITE DEVELOPEMENT STANDARDS WHICH WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE SITEPLAN. THE BUILDING SHOWN HERE IS A CONCEPT AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE STANDARDS. ■ 1 1 rV1 NORPNSSMEE I. d"IAASOMV YEMEN. JAMS HARP LAPPED CEMENT SOME. SONG EXPOSURE 3 31KCEMENT SOSSD TRUSS TYPICAL S A NICNIIIAEISER CEMENT W.I. RAWLS(SNADEOAREAS) S. AEWINW CVO WOOD WHSONS 7 GLASS PARIS,. AIwINw STORE FRONT SYSTEM WI STSUATEDaASS 1 Rent elevation 1 3t16' WESTERN HOMES -GATHERING PLACE -APARTMENT BLDG. 2 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION APARTMENT BLDG.- ELEVATION A201 T Western Home Communities 155'-8" FRONT ELEVATION 155-8" BACK ELEVATION 126'-6 J nieuinnuuiiu .. RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT 14,300 SC) FT PER STORY BACK COURTYARD ELEVATION OPPISITE ELEVATION MIRRORED 1 132'-8" WHC - Assisted Living Facility Iowa City, Iowa LEFT ELEVATION NOTE: — • • I, l "MAM"YSIOEL"SNOTNDSTSSITw IT1 ITEE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ICOMPLY DESIGNS WILLSE PROVIDED AS NEEDED VATH THE SITE PLAN FOR APPROVAL. architecture & planning Summary Report for Good Neighbor Meeting � r gf wrr W"riCr CITY OF IOWA CITY Project Name: Gathering Place Development project Location: Gathering Place Ln Meeting Date and Time: August 25, 2022 @ 4:30 - 6:00pm Meeting Location: St Andrews Presbyterian Church Names of Applicant Representatives attending: Michael Welch - Engineer, Sanjay Jani - Architect Kris Hansen, Pat O'Leary - Western Home Names of City Staff Representatives attending: Anne Russett Number of Neighbors Attending: 20 + Sign -In Attached? Yes No X General Comments received regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary) - The neighbors were generally supportive of the development concept. The neighbors to the north appreciated that much of the wooded areas would not be disturbed, particularly those wooded areas with steeper slopes. The predominance of single-family homes was also well received. They also were pleased that there would be no new roads extending north to their neighborhood through the ravine and waterway. The senior nature and assisted living components were seen as a positive for the neighborhood and community. People liked the variety of building forms proposed for the single-family homes. Concerns expressed regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary) - The primary concerns expressed were related to additional traffic on Camp Cardinal Boulevard, potential for removal of existing trees and habitat, potential for additional runoff and erosion into the waterway north of the development, potential visual impacts of lights from this development on neighbors to the east, and desire to have a landscape buffer between this development and existing houses to the east. Will there be any changes made to the proposal based on this input? If so, describe: No specific changes to the plan will be made as a result of the meeting; however, additional details will be incorporated into the plans as the project moves through the approval process that will directly address landscaping, lighting, runoff, and erosion control. Staff Representative Comments Figure A: Wetland Delineation Map CI Investigation Area Contour (10 ft) 0 Datapoint 0 100 200 300 400 500 Feet Wetland Delineation Western Home Independent Living Services Impoundment Emergent Wetland IMPACT7 October 2022 • Page 9 Wetland Mitigation Plan Western Home Independent Living Services Iowa City Sensitive Lands & Features Welch Design & Development Iowa City, Iowa Effective Date: 12/15/2022 Copyright ©2022 Impact7G, Inc. Prepared By Will Downey, PWS Project Manager (515) 473-6256 IMPACT% 315 West Cherry St., Ste. 4, PO Box 227 North Liberty, IA 52317 515.473.6256 • info@impact7g.com www.impact7g.com Western Horne Independent Living Services Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 II. Wetlands Delineated 3 Iti. Jurisdiction 3 IV. USACE Preferred Mitigation Method 3 V. Compensatory Mitigation Plan (Iowa City, City Code 14-51-6G) 3 VI. Buffer Reduction 3 www impact7g cnm - Pane Western Nome Independent Living Services I. Executive Summary Impact7G has evaluated the 0.04 acres of emergent wetland within the parcel boundary of the proposed Western Home Independent Living Services Development in Iowa City, Iowa. Based on current site plans (1025 SADP-3 Concept Plan, provided by Welch Design and Development), there are no planned impacts to wetlands delineated within the parcel boundary. II. Wetlands Delineated Impact7G delineated a 0.04 acre emergent wetland, located above an approximately 0.5 acre artificial impoundment. Additionally, a 146 linear feet (LF) section of Cardinal Creek is located within the Investigation Area. III. Jurisdiction Due to the proximity of the floodplain and evidence cited during field wetland delineation a potential direct surface hydrologic connection to Cardinal Creek, the wetland area is assumed to be jurisdictional under Section 404 of the United States Clean Water Act as of this date. IV. USACE Preferred Mitigation Method No planned impacts to jurisdictional waters of the United States. No mitigation required. V. Compensatory Mitigation Plan (Iowa City, City Code 14-51-6G) Under current guidance, this project will not require any mitigation through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, however, under the permit conditions for a Nationwide Permit #29 for Residential Development — a Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is required for this regulated activity, including "no impact" developments. A Joint Application for permit should be submitted to both the US Army Corps of Engineers and Iowa Department of Natural Resources and will fulfill the project's PCN requirement. VI. Buffer Reduction The buffer area surrounding the delineated wetland (to the east and south) will need to be reduced by 50 feet to allow placement of the Camille Court cul-de-sac, as this area is already limited in developable space due to two adjacent areas of protected slopes (>40%) and their associated buffers, This area is illustrated on site drawing 1025 SADP-3 Concept Plan, dated 12/9/2022. Iowa City, city code 14-5I-6E allows for wetland buffers to be reduced by up to 50 feet at this location because the following conditions are met based on field evaluation by Impact7G staff at the time of wetland delineation: • City Code 14-51-6E-3a www.impact7g.com • Page 3 Western Home Independent Living Services 1, The wetland is less than 5 acres in area - the delineated wetland is 0.04 acres and does not extend beyond project limits_ 2. The wetland does not contain species listed by the federal or state government as endangered or threatened, or critical or outstanding natural habitat for those species — the wetland area is dominated by invasive reed canary grass and is not the preferred habitat for listed species' 3. The wetland does not contain diverse plant associations of infrequent occurrence or of regional significance — the wetland area is dominated by invasive reed canary' 4. The wetland is not located within a regulated stream corridor - see USGS Topographic Mapping2 • City Code 14-51-6E-3b 2. The wetland likely has periodic standing water in an average year of precipitation and would not qualify for the 75 foot buffer reduction This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client, and for specific application to the project discussed. To the best of my knowledge the above statements, attachments, including those labeled and identified as enclosures, and all conclusions are true, accurate, and based on current environmental principles and science. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are intended or made. In the event that changes in the nature, design or location of the project as shown are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained on this form shall not be considered valid unless Impact7G, Inc. reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this form in writing. Will Downey, PWS Project Manager Impact7G, Inc. 1 Impact7G, 2022, "Threatened and Endangered Species Preliminary Review: Western Homes Independent Living Services", Section 4.1 Iowa City Sensitive Lands & Features. 2 Impact7G, 2022, "Wetland Delineation: Western Homes Independent Living Services", Figure C. www.impact7g.com • Page 4 MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 21, 2022 —6:00 PM — FORMAL MEETING EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL PRELIMINARY MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Craig, Maggie Elliott, Mike Hensch, Maria Padron (via zoom), Mark Signs, Chad Wade MEMBERS ABSENT: Billie Townsend STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Kirk Lehmann, Anne Russett, Parker Walsh OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Welch, Steve Long, Sanjay Jani, Ryan O'Leary, Kirsten Frey RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of REZ22-0012, a proposal to rezone approximately 31.2 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards from Gathering Place Lane to the future extension of Deer Creek Road in accordance with 15-3-2 of the Iowa City Code. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. 2. In the event Owner desires to construct on -street angled parking, at the time of final platting, Owner shall execute an agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney obligating the Owner to maintain such spaces. By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends deferring application REZ22-0015 to the January 4, 2023 meeting. By a vote of 6-0 the Commission recommends approval of VAC22-0002 a vacation of public right-of-way located at the northwest corner of South Riverside Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railroad right-of-way. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. REZ22-0012: Location: East of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane An application for a rezoning of approximately 31.2 acres of land from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 2 of 16 Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8). Lehmann explained this is a rezoning for 31 acres north of Gathering Place Lane and east of Camp Cardinal Road on the west side of Iowa City. He stated this area is probably one of the largest remaining undeveloped areas within the City east of Highway 218. It's been undeveloped for quite some time and is surrounded mostly by existing development with single family homes to the north and east, multifamily homes and a church to the south, and undeveloped land to the west that was recently rezoned for duplexes and multifamily. Lehmann explained in terms of zoning, the property to the north and south are low density single family residential or RS-5, the properties to the east are rural residential or RR-1, and then to the west and a portion of the south is low density multifamily residential, or RM-12. Lehmann pointed out there's lots of planned development overlays in this area because of all the sensitive features, including woodlands and a stream corridor to the north. In terms of background, the Western Home Independent Living Services is looking to rezone the area to allow a senior housing project with a mix of housing types and uses and would include the development of some new streets including a connection into the proposed Cardinal Heights development to the west that was recently rezoned. It would also allow future connections to the St. Andrew's property to the east. Lehmann reiterated the area does contain several sensitive features, including wetlands, streams, slopes and woodlands. This site was actually previously proposed for rezoning for another senior housing project in 2016, 170 units, and it was recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission, but then was subsequently withdrawn by the developer. Lehmann next showed a few pictures of the site noting the topography of rolling hills and the trees, especially along the north side of the property. He also pointed out the area that includes a wetland with a stormwater detention basin. In terms of zoning for the subject property, it actually consists of two properties. The northern most is 27 acres, zoned interim development residential single family or ID-RS, which is primarily intended for agriculture until such a time as it develops. The southern portion is about four acres and zoned low density single family residential with an OPD and that OPD was part of the St. Andrews rezoning for sensitive features. Lehmann explained low density single family residential is primarily for single family uses so the proposed zoning is medium density single family residential with a plan development overlay or RS-8/OPD for primarily single family detached units, but the OPD does allow flexibility and that flexibility includes things like different housing types and a commercial use. It also allows modifications to certain standards to the wetland buffer, which is also being proposed as part of this development. The proposed development would be on three different lots with a single owner and would it include about 101 units, 35 single family, 8 duplexes, 20 townhouse style multifamily and 38 multifamily units. The proposed development would also include one assisted living building with 32 beds and then a small-scale neighborhood commercial use approximately 2300 square feet. This development is proposed on extended streets through the area, including Gathering Place Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 3 of 16 Lane, which would terminate on the east side of the property at the arc of the hill as there are sensitive features primarily to the north. In terms of the criteria used to evaluate OPDs Lehmann explained there are four general criteria found at 14-3A and then there are also two standard criteria that apply to all rezonings. The second standard criteria is tied to compatibility with an existing neighborhood that's also covered by the first criteria for OPD which is tied to density and design and making sure that it's compatible with adjacent development and looking at it from a couple different angles. Density in terms of OPD/RS-8 zone allows eight dwelling units per net acre, and what is proposed is approximately 3.7 dwelling units per acre, so they do meet that standard. Another way the City looks at compatibility is tied to land uses. The proposed development does include a mix of single-family, duplexes and multifamily uses, in addition to assisted group living and neighborhood commercial uses. Lehmann did want to note that with the proposed land uses, this is proposed as a senior development but that being said there's no obligation to provide it for seniors except for the multifamily units, those do have to be provided as elder apartments because they make use of a lower parking standard that that applies to senior housing. The rest of the housing could be occupied by seniors, or it could be occupied by others, but the multifamily must remain elder housing. In terms of how this works with surrounding land uses Lehmann reiterated there's single family to the north and east, to the south there's group assembly and multifamily and then to the west it is expected to be multifamily and duplex uses. There are a mix of uses around the site and the development is trying to transition it through the site. Specifically, the transitions look at having higher intensity uses to the west and south, especially the townhomes, multifamily, and assisted group living. Then towards the east and north, that's where there will be the single family uses with some duplexes on the corners therefore providing a really good transition with the way that the existing neighborhoods are laid out. In terms of other concepts that staff look at with mass and scale they look at the elevations. Most of the building heights that are being proposed are typical for these buildings. Lehmann noted there is a requested waiver for building height for the two multifamily buildings in the center of development, the multifamily building, and the mixed -use building which he will discuss later when they get into the waivers. As far as other considerations, the developer does a good job of making sure that the off-street parking doesn't dominate the streetscape, it's recessed for the single family and duplex units and it's below ground for most of the multifamily units or it's located in shared parking behind the units for the townhomes and assisted group living so that doesn't dominate the streetscape. Lehmann also wanted to touch on lighting, the City does use standards that minimize light and glare in surrounding properties and those standards are stronger when it comes to being surrounded by residential uses so this being a residential zone it would also abide by the low illumination district. Lighting will be reviewed during site plan review as well. Another consideration in terms of compatibility is open space and that private open spaces are provided on each or near each of the dwelling units in compliance with the City's open space standards. In addition to much of the development being open space anyway, through either stormwater management areas or through sensitive features, there's plenty of open space provided in compliance with standards. Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 4 of 16 With regards to traffic circulation, this development does propose extending Deer Creek Road and Gathering Place Lane and Gathering Place Lane would curve through the property and end at the property line to the east near St. Andrew's Church. Off Gathering Place Lane would also be two cul-de-sacs and a loop street. Lehmann noted this project will also include the improvement of Camp Cardinal Road, which is basically a gravel road right now. In terms of access, the primary access for this development would be from Camp Cardinal Boulevard via Camp Cardinal Road and then secondary access would come from the future connection of Deer Creek Road to the west which would depend on the Cardinal Heights subdivision that was recently rezoned. Staff is proposing that the owner must contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road, that would include a roundabout that's proposed for the north side of Camp Cardinal Road where it connects with Deer Creek Road. Lehmann noted that same condition was applied to the Cardinal Heights subdivision to the west as well so between those two properties there would be enough funds to improve that road fully and it would serve as access for both of those developments. Lehmann next discussed the elevations for the development. The single-family elevations are one story, as are the duplex elevations, the townhomes are three stories, the assisted living units are two stories, and the proposed mixed -use and multifamily buildings are proposed to be three and a half stories with that top story being gathering space and outdoor patio space. However, Lehmann explained having that additional half story would push it above the 35 feet that's the typical height limit plus the grade. Regarding the criteria tied to overburdening existing streets and utilities, generally the site can be provided with water and sewer, one complication is that water needs to be looped so that may occur on the site or it may occur off the site and that will determined during platting as those calculations are done. Utilities are fine, in terms of streets it is a development with a single point of access so to avoid overburdening the City does place thresholds on the amount of daily trips that would be allowed. The amount of trips that they would expect at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Gathering Place Lane would be 309 daily trips, which is below the threshold for becoming overburdened as a local street, but that is assuming that Deer Creek Road is extended to the west. If Deer Creek Road is not extended to the west, that would mean that Camp Cardinal Road where it connects with Camp Cardinal Boulevard would be the single access to this development. However that road is built to collector standards which has a pretty substantial increase allowed for daily trips so staff doesn't anticipate any issues even if there isn't secondary access. One other unusual thing with this development is there's a proposed portion of Gathering Place Lane that includes angled on -street parking and that is something that typically isn't allowed because City services aren't equipped typically to maintain those, especially in snow. Therefore, staff does recommend a condition that the owner maintain all of the on -street angle parking spaces and adjacent properties. Staff does believe that the angle parking makes sense given the fact that there's proposed small scale commercial uses located right outside. Craig asked where's the secondary access if and when it gets developed. Lehmann pointed it out as where Deer Creek Road would be extended as part of the Cardinal Heights subdivision, but it can't go through until that gets developed. He added it is the same with Gathering Place Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 5 of 16 Lane, it stubs off at the St. Andrews property, it does allow for future connectivity, but no development is anticipated there in the near future. The third criteria is related to effects on surrounding properties compared to conventional developments. Lehmann stated to the north the building that's being proposed closer to the rear property line as a single-family home would be 16 feet instead of 20 feet. That being said, the closest development is located across a woodland preservation area and stream corridor so it's not particularly close and staff doesn't anticipate any more impacts than a conventional development. To the east there is a pipeline easement that creates more than a 30-foot buffer and that's further than would typically be in a conventional development as well. However, to the west and south those setbacks are typical for single family zones and staff doesn't think that there are going to be any impacts beyond the conventional development given those factors. Regarding land uses, building types and modified requirements, all are in the public interest. Lehmann stated there are several waivers that are requested as part of this application. For example, there's a rear setback waiver from 20 feet to 16 feet for the single family home to the north, there's a requested front setback reduction from 20 feet to 15 feet for three of the townhomes along Gathering Place Lane and Deer Creek Road, there's a front setback reduction from 25 feet to 15 feet for single family homes on the cul-de-sacs and as part of that for single family homes that would also typically require that the first floor is elevated 30 inches above the sidewalk, but they have requested a waiver from that as well because it's a senior housing development and they want zero entry access. In terms of other building bulk standards, they are requesting a waiver to increase the height for the multifamily buildings from 35 feet to 45 feet to accommodate the additional half story on those buildings for gathering space and it would also adjust for the grade that is on the property. The applicant is also proposing a mix of uses that would not typically be in an RS-8 zone including single family, duplex, multifamily and assisted group living, as well as a small-scale neighborhood commercial use. Lehmann explained generally OPDs encourage a mix of uses and encourage commercial uses within mixed use buildings that provide or help meet the needs of those living in the area. The final request for a waiver is to reduce the onsite parking for the neighborhood commercial use reducing it from nine spaces to seven spaces and again that is something allowed under the OPD zone for commercial uses if it helps preserve sensitive areas. In this case the only place where those two additional spaces could be added would be to the off-street parking lot to the north, which is right next to sensitive features, so staff believes that criteria is met, especially considering the fact that there's proposed on -street diagonal parking that would help meet the needs of this commercial use that don't get counted towards this minimum parking requirement. Moving onto the factors that are considered for all rezonings, first is compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. This area is shown as having two to eight dwelling units an acre, there is no Northwest District Plan that's adopted so staff just go by the Comprehensive Plan. There's also a number of goals in the Comprehensive Plan related to housing diversity, connected neighborhoods and contiguous neighborhoods, pedestrian oriented development, and preservation of sensitive features. One that's a little more complicated is tied to street connectivity but in this case it is a challenging site and there's not a lot of places to get access or Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 6 of 16 where they can provide street stubs to adjacent properties. This proposal does include the Deer Creek Road extension and connecting to the St. Andrews property, however there are no areas to connect to the east or north because of sensitive features and the layout of those neighborhoods. So given the extent possible, they do provide connectivity as to what would be allowed on that site. Lehmann stated there's the sensitive areas portion of this and a level two review is required, which is a review by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council that is tied to reducing the wetland buffer from 100 feet to 50 feet. That being said, there's also a stream, slopes and wooded areas on the site and staff also looked at archaeological sites. In terms of the jurisdictional wetlands, the wetland area on this site is pretty small, just 0.04 acres. Typically, that would require 100-foot buffer around the wetlands but it may be reduced to a 50 foot buffer with a level two review and if certain standards are met and certified by a wetland specialist. In this case there is a memo from the wetland specialist in the agenda packet that looks at those different criteria. Staff has also reviewed the background information including information on endangered species on the wetland itself and staff does concur with the findings by the wetland specialist. Cardinal Creek is on the very north side of the property but it is located far enough from construction boundaries that it's not really a factor in this. There are approximately 6.5 acres of woodlands on the property and to avoid a level two review they have to retain 50% of that, and also provide a buffer. 52% of the woodlands are retained in this development and only approximately 19% of the woodlands are impacted, the rest of the acreage is included within that buffer area. In terms of slopes, there are numerous slopes on the property but a lot of the steepest slopes are located at the northern part of the property and level two reviews are only required if more than 35% of critical slopes are impacted or if the protected slopes or their buffers are impacted. In this case, they've avoided the protected slopes and their buffers and have only impacted 31 % of critical slopes so this meets the standards for administrative review. With regard to archaeological sites, a phase one study was completed in 2022 and no artifacts were identified and no further work was recommended. Finally, to touch on neighborhood open space standards which are required by 14-5K either by providing open space on site or paying a fee in lieu of it, that's addressed at final platting but in this case with 31.2 acres in an RS-8 zone, it would require dedication of 1.08 acres or a fee of approximately $140,000. With regard to correspondence staff didn't receive any written correspondence on this application. There was a good neighbor meeting held. Staff recommends approval of REZ22-0012, a proposal to rezone approximately 31.2 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards from Gathering Place Lane to the future extension of Deer Creek Road in accordance with 15-3-2 of the Iowa City Code. Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 7 of 16 This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. 2. In the event Owner desires to construct on -street angled parking, at the time of final platting, Owner shall execute an agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney obligating the Owner to maintain such spaces. In terms of next steps, presuming there is a recommendation tonight for City Council, staff anticipates setting the hearing on January 10 for consideration by Council on January 24, there would be the hearing, and then there'll be two additional readings beyond that. Hensch asked from the 2016 rezoning application, which was a different applicant, are these the same parcel boundaries. Lehmann believes it was just the north part of the site and it was 170 units in that proposal, including a mix of some assisted living as well as independent living all in one building. Hensch has tried to read the topographic map and the elevations, but it looks like it generally slopes from east to west with a lot of elevation changes and there's a ridge line that runs along the bowl of it. Lehmann showed an aerial of the north portion of the site noting the ridge line follows the street essentially and it slopes north, east and west, depending on where they are on the property. On the south side of the site it generally slopes to the south. Hensch asked that mostly just for issues with lighting and lighting glare for the people in the Walnut Ridge neighborhood or people concerned about that and could Lehmann talk a little bit about the downcast lighting requirements for the City and would that be for any parking areas that have streetlights with that. Lehmann explained shielding is generally required if a volt is above a certain amount. There are also requirements towards total light output and that's where the low illumination standard comes in and that's the lowest standard that would be allowed. The idea is to avoid just general glare and then there's also standards about not having light trespass on the surrounding properties for residential uses. Finally, there's limits on pole height and a couple other things that try to limit the impacts on surrounding properties. Hensch remembers from the 2016 conversation, the predominant thing they heard from the neighbors to the east was about view shed disruption and the bulk size of the building, but the larger building is now down in that south westerly portion for this application correct. Lehmann said it would be in the west central between the two properties. Craig asked about the clubhouse and if that is for the whole development, not just the people who live in the 16 residential units. Lehmann confirmed it'd be available for anyone who lives within this development. The clubhouse building does have space on the ground floor, including a cafe that's available to residents, a gym that's available to residents, and then the gathering space on the roof. Signs had a question about the cul-de-sac on the east end of Gathering Place Lane and for all practical purposes he doesn't think that road is going to be extended anywhere, would staff agree or disagree with that assessment. Lehmann agreed there are significant challenges to Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 8 of 16 extending it to the south, there is another stream corridor and there are cost limitations that would apply. Signs noted they hear over and over the City doesn't like cul-de-sacs anymore, for example they had a significant development on the west side that involve sensitive land and it was modified extensively because there was a cul-de-sac proposed on it so he was a little surprised to see this. Wade asked if he understands correctly that there's a waiver request for the single family from 25 to 15 feet. Lehmann states it is from 20 feet to 16 feet for the northern most lot, lot nine and also for the cul-de-sac bulbs there's a larger front setback that's required than typical. So instead of the typical 15 feet, which is what the single family typically is, there's a 25-foot requirement on the bulb of the cul-de-sac, so that's the waiver that's being requested. Additionally, that's also what triggers the 30 inches above grade standard that they're requesting another waiver from. Wade also asked about the assisted living building at the southwest corner of Deer Creek Road and Gathering Place Lane, he assumes that's going to be a staffed facility so where is the associated staff parking. Lehmann stated he believes one parking space per staff person is anticipated and one for every three beds within the facility for the residents, therefore they do provide enough parking on site. Padron asked for clarification on when it says illumination cannot exceed 0.5 initial horizontal foot-candles and 2.0 initial maximum foot-candles at any property line adjacent to or across the street so only on property lines adjacent to the street, will two be the maximum, but then in the rest of the property lines it will be 0.5. Lehmann stated that would apply to any lot line that is by a residential use, which he believes is almost all property lines with this specific property. The horizontal foot candles are measured at a certain height above grade and in lumens so when they submit a site plan they do a lighting analysis and staff makes sure it's within the thresholds for light trespass on adjacent properties. Hensch opened the public hearing. Mike Welch (Welch Design and Development) is representing the applicant, also present tonight is Sanjay Jani from AKAR and he's doing the architecture for everything other than the memory care assisted living building and also in attendance is Steve Long who is the developer's representative for the project, so between the three of them, hopefully they can answer all the questions. Welch began by noting this has been a challenging site and they've worked on it for a number of years with different people. With Western Home, it's an exciting use of the various uses that they're proposing and they don't usually see that much variation across the site. The addition of the 2300 square feet for neighborhood commercial is exciting to have a place for their residents, but also for Cardinal Heights and other people in the neighborhood, since there's not much else out there. So that is another good positive use of the site. Welch noted they did have a good neighbor meeting and during that that meeting one of the things they heard most of from the neighbors to the east and north was what the impact would be on those sensitive areas. Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 9 of 16 Welch reiterated that they are meeting the code requirements and feel real confident and good about that. Hensch noted during the good neighbor meetings in 2016 he remembers a consideration of that application, which the Commission and Council did actually approve but it was withdrawn, anyway, one of the overall concerns for the neighbors was view shed interruption. Did they hear much of that at this good neighborhood meeting. Welch stated it was kind of brought up, people that came were questioning what they were doing, what they were proposing and once people saw that it was primarily single family on the north end the negative ones generally felt better about that and that they weren't looking at a super tall building. Having the multifamily buildings located far enough away from the neighbors to the north and the east that made those impacts pretty minimal. Hensch asked about lot number nine to the north, where they're asking for that reduction, is the area behind there a really difficult area to develop. Welch confirmed yes, immediately north of that property line is an outlot and from Cardinal Ridge, the development to the north, that's in a conservation easement. Craig had a question about the townhouses, she doesn't typically think of them as elder housing because it's living on three different floors, all the single-family houses are a single floor but then all these townhouses that are three floors. Welch explained Western Home's goal is that they understand that people are at different points in their life and different mobilities and access and desires so they've wanted to have that broad market for not just people who want a single-family house or people who want condo style living, so there is an option in those townhouses to have an elevator that people can add to the design. Also for those in memory care, they need to recognize that sometimes a spouse or significant other may need the memory care, but others are still independent and this gets that balance. Signs asked if the first floor includes the garage. Welch confirmed it does and that is a fairly common type of construction in the market. Hektoen added the zoning code will limit the occupancy of that of those units, only the multifamily are going to be limited by the zoning code for senior living. Padron noted she was looking at the clubhouses floorplan and it says it has 16 units but the floorplan that was presented tonight shows it has eight units. Welch replied it was 16 units in the clubhouse building, there's no units on the first floor and then 8 units each on the second and third floors. Steve Long (Salida Partners representing Western Home) gave a little background about Western Home communities. They are based in Cedar Falls, Iowa, but they have communities throughout Central Iowa and Northeast Iowa. What they strived to do is to have a sense of community and build community. At their main campus in Cedar Falls it's a 200-acre campus with 1100 residents, which is larger than most towns in Iowa and it's a real community with Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 10 of 16 restaurants and fitness facilities. Long stated his firm has been working with Mike Welch and Sanjay Jani for over a year now to get this right mix of units for this market, they really wanted to have that mix of two and three bedrooms, townhomes, condos, assisted living single family homes and then even within single family homes have a variety so there is different affordability as well. Western Home is known for their memory care and assisted living facilities and in this market there is a big need for those facilities so that's an important part of the continuum that will be developed probably towards the end of the project. Long noted even though he's been in Iowa City over 25 years, he grew up in Cedar Falls and has known about Western Home his entire life and has a lot of friends and family members who have lived there so he's excited to be a part of this team to bring them to this market. Craig asked what about affordable housing. Long acknowledged they talked about that and given the market base it's going to be based on the size of units. There are not any subsidized units being proposed but they're happy to work with the Housing Trust Fund or another entity. He added they mentioned these homes will be open to anybody, but these will all be deed restricted as 55 plus is the model, except for the assisted living and memory care, of course, but for the standalone homes, their deed restricted forever 55 plus. At this point they've been looking at a mix of housing styles to offer different price points. Hensch asked if the assisted living facility includes memory care or is it just assisted living. Long confirmed it is a mixture of both. Sanjay Jani (AKAR Architecture) stated he has been doing residential architecture for almost 35 years and one thing he does not like is when all the houses end up looking exactly the same when the diversity of America is changing, and they all look different. So the first thing they did was made it possible to be more democratic, where people buy into these houses they have option to choose different colors, different planning, different options, so every house can be a little more individual to ensure the individuality of the people who live with them. Nothing will look like cookie cutter housing. Even with the townhouses, the way they are stepping it up to have four -foot offsets instead of one linear flat building they are breaking the scale and are definitely doing things a little different than what he's seen in this marketplace. Hensch asked about the elevators in the townhomes, if somebody purchased the townhome but didn't have the elevator initially, can they add that like 20 years later if they then need an elevator. Jani confirmed they'll plan the elevator in the plan exactly where it should go because they need the tolerances for the doors and everything to open, so the idea would be to put the joists. He noted the amazing thing is this elevator is like a suction tube of only three foot six wide, it's a perfect circle of glass of three foot six so even if one doesn't don't build or buy the elevator is not a huge wasted space. Wade asked if all these units will be zero entry. Jani replied from garage to the house is zero entry and the hope is to have zero entry everywhere, even the front door so there will be no steps, and if there are floors, there will be an elevator option. Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 11 of 16 Ryan O'Leary (343 Butternut Lane) stated his house backs up to the eastern most portion of the planned development and the southernmost area. He likes a lot of what he sees on the plan and has a fair amount of optimism and faith that there'll be further detail to the plan. But, in particular where his windows back up to three units along that back ridge, it has a pretty significant impact and he has a fair amount of optimism that there'll be some landscaping screening that'll be mutually beneficial. So he just wanted to voice his thoughts and concerns about that in the event that there wasn't any sort of a landscaping buffer as that would be regrettable for him and whoever lives in those three houses, but he always anticipated something being done back there. He also noted with the slopes a lot of his property is about 35 feet below so it limits what they can do on their property to create that visual screening. If some screening is done to the west of the pipeline easement that would allow the visual screening. He noted right now they're a density of one house per acre and this would put three houses in about 50% of their visual vantage point out the back which is a little bit more concentration than they're used to. Hensch closed the public hearing. Signs moved to recommend approval of REZ22-0012, a proposal to rezone approximately 31.2 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Road and north of Gathering Place Lane from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID-RS) and Low Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Medium Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-8) subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards from Gathering Place Lane to the future extension of Deer Creek Road in accordance with 15-3-2 of the Iowa City Code. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. 2. In the event Owner desires to construct on -street angled parking, at the time of final platting, Owner shall execute an agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney obligating the Owner to maintain such spaces. Elliott seconded the motion. Hensch really liked the mixed housing and the senior living facility, and the memory care, it's exactly what they need in the City. Those on the Commission at the time were bitterly disappointed when the previous application was withdrawn and now that facility is in Coralville. Craig noted it's obvious a lot of thought has been put into this and also likes the diversity of housing. She agrees that every house shouldn't look the same. What she's concerned about is they've seen quite a few senior housing developments and thinks this is going to be really expensive for people to live there and will be really out of reach for many, many people, particularly elderly people, but is in support of the project. Elliott agrees about the comments regarding the architecture and also is in support of this project. Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 12 of 16 Signs stated notwithstanding his comments about the large cul-de-sac nature of the development, he is in support of it too and thinks it's a fantastic mix and hopes it is developed with the way it's been laid out. Hensch agreed and is generally never in support of cul-de-sacs or bulbs but this is just a tough site and there's not really any other option. Iowa City is running out of developable land and he likes this application. Wade stated he is on board considering the challenge and the topography. It's a nice layout, it looks walkable for the neighborhood and it's nice to see the commercial area whether that ends up as a coffee shop or whatever, it's a draw to the neighborhood. Padron also stated she supports this development. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. REZ22-0015: Location: North of W. Benton Street and west of Orchard Street An application for a rezoning of approximately 3.52 acres of land from Low Density Single Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) to Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0). Russett stated the applicant has requested a deferral to January 4, the next commission meeting, staff is still working through some conditions with them. Signs moved defer application REZ22-0015 to the January 4 meeting. Elliott seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. VAC22-0002: Location: Northwest corner of S. Riverside Dr. and the Iowa Interstate Railroad An application for a vacation of approximately 266 square feet of public right-of-way to increase the developable area for the proposed redevelopment at the southwest corner of Myrtle Avenue and S. Riverside Drive. Russett explained this is a vacation of 266 square feet of public right-of-way along South Riverside Drive. The area is just north of the Iowa Interstate Railroad. Russett showed the zoning map of the area noting this is a public right-of-way. The background on this vacation is the City recently acquired this 266 square feet and the purpose of that acquisition was to help with installing a pedestrian tunnel under the Iowa Interstate Railroad, however that project is not going to be moving forward because there were concerns from the Railroad regarding the tunnel Item Number: 7.c. CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org January 10, 2023 Motion setting a public hearing for January 24, 2023 on an ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 3.52 acres of land from Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Riverfront Crossing — Orchard (RFC-0) to Riverfront Crossing — Orchard (RFC-0). (REZ22-0015) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report with Supplemental Memo ^�_,,® CITY OF I O W A CITY MEMORANDUM Date: January 4, 2023 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Rezoning of approximately 3.52 acres of land to Riverfront Crossing -Orchard (RFC-0) zone located north of W. Benton St. and west of Orchard St. (REZ22-0015) Background At the Planning and Zoning Commission's December 21, 2022 meeting, the applicant of REZ22- 0015 requested a deferral to January 4, 2023 to allow more time to discuss the proposed rezoning conditions with staff. At issue was staff's recommended condition that would require the owner to resubdivide the property through the final platting process. After further discussion, staff has proposed to remove the condition related to final platting. Staff's main concern related to the public improvements required for this development, such as the traffic signalization and associated intersection improvements. Staff has revised the conditions to eliminate the need for a plat, but still ensure the public improvements are installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The revised conditions are as follows: 1. Prior to site plan approval for any development on the property, Owner shall: a. Enter into an agreement with the City providing for the construction of public improvements or the provision of an improvements escrow prior to issuance of a building permit. In all cases, however, the public improvements shall be constructed prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy. The public improvements shall include, but not be limited to: i. 6' wide sidewalk along the W. Benton Street frontage of the subject property in a location approved by the City Engineer. ii 5' wide sidewalk along the Orchard Street/Court frontage of the subject property in a location approved by the City Engineer. iii. Traffic signalization at the corner of W. Benton and Orchard Streets, and associated intersection improvements, which may include turn lanes, as approved by the City Engineer. iv. Reconstruction of Orchard Street/Court in a manner approved by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit for any development on the property, Owner shall dedicate: a. A 30' wide public access easement over the span of the pedestrian street and dedicate right-of-way to the City, without compensation, along W. Benton Street and Orchard Street/Court. The area to be dedicated shall be up to 15' wide, depending on the design of the traffic signalization and is subject to approval by the City Engineer. b. Any additional easements necessary to comply with the City's subdivision design standards. January 4, 2023 Page 2 Public Comment Staff received several pieces of correspondence related to this rezoning that were submitted after publication of the December 21, 2022 agenda packet. All comments received as of December 29, 2022 are included in Attachment 2. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of REZ22-0015, a proposal to rezone approximately 3.52 acres of property near the intersection of W. Benton Street and Orchard Street/Court from Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) to Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0), subject to the revised conditions outlined above. Attachments 1. December 21, 2022 Staff Report 2. Late Correspondence STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ22-0015 GENERAL INFORMATION: Prepared by: Emani Brinkman, Planning Intern and Anne Russett, Senior Planner Date: December 21, 2022 Applicant: Zach Feldman Aptitude Development 669 River Drive, Suite 402 Elmwood Park, NJ 07407 zf(a�aptitudere.com Contact Person: Brian Boelk Axiom Consultants, LLC 60 E. Court Street, Unit 3 Iowa City, IA 52240 bboelk@axiom-con.com Owner: M&W Properties P.O. Box 5152 Coralville, IA 52241 319-430-5991 Rvanwade1000@qmail.com Requested Action: Rezone from Low Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) to Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) Purpose: Redevelopment of the area to comply with the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. Location: North of W Benton Street and west of Orchard Street/Court 2 Location Map: Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: 3.52 Acres Residential building, Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Riverfront Crossing - Orchard Subdistrict (RFC-0) North: RS-8, Medium Density Single -Family Residential Zone RFC-WR, Riverfront Crossings - West Riverfront South RS-8, Medium Density Single -Family Residential Zone East: RS-8, Medium Density Single -Family Residential Zone West: RFC-WR, Riverfront Crossings - West Riverfront Comprehensive Plan: Mixed Use District Plan: Riverfront Crossings Master Plan Neighborhood Open Space District: SW3 Public Meeting Notification: Properties within 500' of the subject property received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. A rezoning sign was posted on the site on November 19, 2022. File Date: November 15, 2022 45 Day Limitation Period: December 30, 2022 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Aptitude Development, has requested a rezoning from Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (RS-5/OPD) and Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) to Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) for 3.52 acres near the intersection of Orchard St and Benton St. The proposed rezoning includes 224, 226, 330, 614, 622, 630, 650, and 652 Orchard Court; 711, 725, 727, 741, and 743 Orchard Street; 204 and 206 W. Benton Street (See Attachment 3). In 2016, the City Council adopted an amendment to the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan creating the Orchard District, which included properties along Orchard Street and Orchard Court north of Benton Street. The purpose of the District was to encourage residential redevelopment that would serve as a transition between the higher intensity mixed -use area along S. Riverside Drive and the lower intensity single-family residential neighborhood to the west. After the amendment to the Master Plan, the City Council adopted an amendment to the zoning code to incorporate Orchard District standards into the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. The zoning standards were adopted to ensure that buildings are complementary in mass and scale to the adjacent single-family neighborhood. This zoning code amendment also included the addition of the Orchard District to the Regulating Plan. The properties on Orchard Ct. were zoned as Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) in 1981 (Ordinance No. 81-3038). This was done because of the multi -family units that were proposed on the lot. The multi -family units were used as a buffer for the single-family housing from the commercial uses to the east and the railroad tracts to the north. In 2018, a portion of the subject property was rezoned to RFC-0 (REZ18-00019) subject to the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall: i. Dedicate 15' of right-of-way along the north side of the Benton St. frontage to the City; ii. Dedicate a 30' wide access easement running in a north -south direction generally along the western 30' of the vacated Orchard Court right-of-way south across the property locally known as 330 Orchard Ct., to the southern property line of 330 Orchard Ct., in a location approved by the City Engineer; iii. Dedicate a 30' wide public access easement over the span of the pedestrian street; iv. Design and obtain approval from the City Forrester of a landscaping plan for the subject property. The landscaping plan shall include, among other plantings, street trees in the Orchard St. right-of-way; and v. Execute an affordable housing agreement to satisfy the affordable housing obligations imposed pursuant to Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8 through the provision of on -site owner -occupied dwelling units, on -site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on - site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the City. b. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Owner shall: i. Construct a 6' wide sidewalk along the Benton St. frontage of the subject property in a location approved by the City Engineer; ii. Construct a 5' wide sidewalk along the Orchard St. frontage of the subject property; iii. Construct a pedestrian street as shown in the concept plan; and iv. Install all plantings shown on and required by the approved landscaping plan. The applicant has held two good neighbor meetings (See Attachment 4). The original meeting 4 was held September 28, 2022. The concept presented at the September 28t" meeting did not align with the policy direction of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan or the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code; and therefore, could not be developed without amendments to both the plan and the code. Based on feedback from both staff and members of the public, significant changes were made to the concept and rezoning proposal and the applicant held a second good neighbor meeting on November 30, 2022. The revised concept presented during the second good neighbor meeting is included in Attachment 5; however, the proposed rezoning does not require that any future redevelopment of the subject property be consistent with this concept. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: The property is currently zoned Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (RS-5/OPD) and Riverfront Crossings — Orchard (RFC-0). As was previously mentioned, in 1981 a portion of the site was rezoned to RS-5/OPD to allow for multi -family development. The RS-5 zone is primarily intended for the development of single-family residential although some other uses such as duplexes and daycares are allowed in the zone. The Planned Development Overlay allows flexibility in the use and design of structures and land in situations where conventional development may be inappropriate and where modification to requirements of the underlying zone will not be contrary to the intent and purpose of this title, inconsistent with the comprehensive plan, as amended, or harmful to the surrounding neighborhood. The RFC-0 zone is "Intended for lower intensity residential development in buildings with street - facing entries opening onto pedestrian -friendly streetscapes that provide a transition between higher intensity mixed -use areas along Riverside Drive and low -scale residential neighborhoods to the west." This zone was tailored specifically for an approximately 5-acre area, within which the subject properties are located. The zone also explicitly prohibits commercial and industrial uses in this zone, except in live -work townhouses. Proposed Zoning: The proposed RFC-0 zone does not restrict density through limitations on dwelling units per acre, but rather through limitations on maximum building height. Unlike the other RFC zones, the Orchard zone has no bonus height provisions and does not allow building heights to exceed the base maximum of three stories. Multi -family buildings in this subdistrict that are two stories or greater are also required to have a 10' stepback, intended to mitigate the visual impact of larger buildings. If the proposed rezoning is approved, future development will be subject to the Affordable Housing Requirement in place for all Riverfront Crossings zoning designations. This requirement mandates the provision of affordable housing units in the amount of 10 or more percent of all dwelling units in the development. This requirement may also be satisfied through a fee in lieu contribution to an affordable housing fund. The applicant intends to satisfy the affordable housing requirement through a fee in lieu. Although the affordable housing requirement was included as a condition of the 2018 rezoning, staff is not carrying forward that condition as it is a requirement of the zoning code and does not need to be included as a separate condition. Existing Land Uses: The subject property is currently developed with a mix of single-family, duplex, and four-plex units. In total, there are approximately 24 dwelling units within the proposed rezoning area. Rezoning Review Criteria: Staff uses the following two criteria in the review of rezoning: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; 5 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan: The Riverfront Crossing Master Plan describes the Orchard Court District as fully developed with duplexes, small multi -family and some single- family dwellings. The plan encourages redevelopment of this area at a higher density while providing a transition between the large-scale development along S. Riverside Drive and the single-family to the west. Development should be restricted to building typologies, such as cottage clusters, townhomes, live -work townhomes and multi -dwelling buildings that are designed and scaled in a manner that is complementary to the rhythm and scale of the single- family neighborhood located to the south and west, where the goal is to preserve the existing housing stock. The Riverfront Crossing Plan also has objectives to improve the design quality of development and create better and more visible street access for the Orchard District. The figure to the right shows an excerpt from the Riverfront Crossing Master Plan that lists the plan objectives, desired development character for the district, and the types of development envisioned for this area. The proposed rezoning would satisfy several of these objectives. It would allow development that would create a transition from larger -scale mixed use and commercial buildings along S. Riverside Dr. to single family housing to the west of the district. Rezoning the property to RFC-0 will facilitate the type of redevelopment envisioned for this area in the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Development in this area would be required to go through the staff Design Review Committee and comply with the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code, this area. Orchard District Summary Master Plan Objectives: r Encourage redevelopment that is complementary in mass and scale to the adjacent single family neighborhood r Create a transition from larger -scale mixed -use and commercial buildings along Riverside Drive to single family r Improve design quality of development r Create better and more visible street access Development Character: r Buildings that are articulated and scaled in a manner appropriate for transition from the larger -scale, mixed -use corridor to the adjacent single family neighborhood r Buildings fronting tree -lined streets r Parking located away from street frontages with minimal surface parking lots r Use rear or side yard setbacks, upper floor stepbacks, and landscaping to create transitions to single family neighborhood Development Program: Limited to cottage homes, rowhouses, townhouses, live -work townhouses, and two to three-story multi -dwelling buildings with third floor stepback. High level of design in exchange for increased density which is the intent of the adopted policy direction for 6 Compatibility with Existing Neighborhood Character: The proposed rezoning is distinct from a typical rezoning in that the impetus for the Orchard zone's creation was to ensure neighborhood compatibility. It was expressly created to provide a transitional buffer between the more intensive development allowed in the Riverfront Crossings — West Riverfront (RFC-WR) zone to the east and the existing Medium Density Single -Family Residential (RS-8) to the west. To ensure neighborhood compatibility the zone restricts height to three stories and requires an increased setback of 30' from adjacent residential uses. In addition, the Regulating Plan (see figure at right) includes a north/south pedestrian street that ensures more than one building, which helps to break up the mass and scale of any redevelopment. Staff is recommending as a condition of the rezoning that a 30' public access easement be dedicated over the span of the pedestrian street. The condition from the 2018 rezoning that a pedestrian street be constructed is not needed since is required by the Regulating Plan, which is part of Title 14 Zoning. The 2018 rezoning also included conditions related to landscaping. For the proposed rezoning, staff is not recommending any conditions related to landscaping since the Riverfront Crossings Form - Based Code has landscaping requirements, including the planting of street trees. it Transportation and Access: When a portion of the subject property was rezoned in 2018, staff requested that the applicant submit a traffic study to evaluate how the proposed development might impact traffic in the area. The study examined two adjacent intersections: Benton St. and Orchard St. and Benton St. and S. Riverside Dr. The analysis indicated that while the S. Riverside Dr. and Benton St. intersection would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS), the southbound approach of Orchard St. at Benton would operate at an unacceptable LOS E during the AM peak hour and a LOS F during the PM peak hour. The proposed rezoning in 2018, which included a portion of the subject property, was anticipated to create an additional 20-30 peak hour trips during AM and PM peak hours (approximately 7:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M.). The proposed rezoning being considered now would result in substantially more traffic generation. Since the area under consideration would result in additional traffic than previously contemplated, staff recommends a condition that the intersection of Benton St. and Orchard St. be signalized. Signalization may also require intersection improvements, such as turn lanes, as well as dedication of additional right-of-way which is also required by the proposed rezoning condition. There are also other transportation related conditions that staff recommends be carried forward from the previous rezoning. These include the construction of a 6' wide sidewalk along W. Benton Street, the construction of a 5' wide sidewalk along Orchard Street, and the dedication of right-of-way along W. Benton Street and Orchard Street. Lastly, staff is recommending a condition that Orchard Street be reconstructed in a manner approved by the City Engineer. There is one condition related to access from the 2018 rezoning that staff is not recommending 7 as part of this rezoning. Specifically, a condition related to the dedication of a 30' wide north/south access easement along the western edge of the property is no longer needed. This condition was contemplated with the previous rezoning in case an additional access point was needed to address traffic. Instead, staff is recommending signalization. Neighborhood Open Space: According to section 14-5K of the City code, dedication of public open space or fee in lieu of land dedication is addressed at the time of final platting for residential subdivisions. As part of a condition of the rezoning, staff is recommending that the area be re - subdivided through the final plat process due to the required signalization and infrastructure improvements that are needed. During the subdivision process the neighborhood open space requirement will be evaluated. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed rezoning. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ22-0015, a proposal to rezone approximately 3.52 acres of property near the intersection of W. Benton Street and Orchard Street/Court from Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) to Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0), subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to site plan approval, Owner shall re -subdivide the property through the final plat process. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall: a. Dedicate a 30' wide public access easement over the span of the pedestrian street. b. Dedicate right-of-way to the City, without compensation, along W. Benton Street and Orchard Street/Court. The area to be dedicated shall be up to 15' depending on the design of the traffic signalization and is subject to approval by the City Engineer. 3. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Owner shall: a. Construct a 6' wide sidewalk along the W. Benton Street frontage of the subject property in a location approved by the City Engineer. b. Construct a 5' wide sidewalk along the Orchard Street/Court frontage of the subject property in a location approved by the City Engineer. c. Install traffic signalization at the corner of W. Benton and Orchard Streets, and associated intersection improvements, which may include turn lanes, as approved by the City Engineer. d. Reconstruct Orchard Street/Court in a manner approved by the City Engineer. ATTACHMENTS: 1 Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Rezoning Exhibit 4. Summary Report from Good Neighbor Meetings 5. Development Concept Approved by: -Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services T l I;i W#4! IIIIJk 11 1- u. 1711ElM irra Irirrin MirliiitIll — ORCHARD ST a f 7.1 "0 cn 0 2 2 § _ c u o E1) . Tao LL, 0•.2124 qCn a��t $ 2 \ / OS ° 2 •� '§ § v E & 5./ O L) - c m Lt.. csi ° U § U 0•- § ca.{ / N u •2 - ° " \ § d q = § 2 7,4 o ;cc § a T.u�0§ � OS c - U / (M6I) k ".ur.2.0C,t4p. . / / c .w U r,z j ƒ G k o _ 0 0 0 E O.\ 0 § . o a 2 I;i W#4! IIIIJk 11 1- u. 1711ElM irra Irirrin MirliiitIll 0225I-�6.11ad 111107M1IUSW011 ANA wor 1N3Wd013A3a 3aflllldV VOZO-TZ 901 ONIMb'tl0 9VZZS 'VMOI 'AlIJ VAM101 1J aSVH300 11VHS21VA 3H1tl LL 0 119IHX39NINOZ3215r `1 PROJECT LOCATION MAP: (NOTTO SCALE) APPLICANT INFORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT BOUNDARY: NOI1JflH LSNOJ HOd lON ZONING INFORMATION: 2 Z PROPOSEDZONI WIN iwr,111.1 •0Z'05Z 3.98.88 .005 ran oz w2 n$ EOLO[1 I• I_ mz I om o as o m I o m E2 . n0 I E69 NO Ni18i9 858 :ONINOZ 15 N01N39 M 8TL 858 :ONINOZ 15 N01N39 M ON 8Stl :ONINOZ 1S N01N39 M 0(L 858:ONINOZ - T088T9T0T10113DdVtl h.. 858:9NINOZ 15NO1N39 M806 858 :ONINOZ 15 NO1N39 M L0E 858 19NINOZ 15N01N39 M L18 8Stl 19NINOZ 1SNO1N39M018 W Z00 :DNINOZ k10 301Stl3AI11 S T08 8Sk1 :9NINOZ 15 0k1tlHON 0 608 8Sk1 ,.9NINOZ '' 15N01N39 MSOZ 8Sk1 :9NINOZ 15 NO1N39 M£TZ I 8Sk1 :9NINOZ 15 NO1N39 MSTZ H85k1'9NINOZ 1S NO1N39 MTZZ 851,1 :9N INOZ 1S NO1N 39 M SZZ 85k1 I9NINOZ I1S NOIN 39 M 6ZZ 8S171N.IN02. 15 N01N39 M£0£ 8Sk1 (ONINOZ 11S N01N39 M£TE 859 :9NINOZ 1S NO1N39 MTZE g59 9NIN0Z 15 N01N39 MSZE From: Brian Boelk To: Anne Russett; Michael Welch Subject: RE: [External] Orchard & Benton Rezoning Date: Friday, December 16, 2022 7:16:32 AM Attachments: imacie003.ono image004.Dna imacie005.Dno imaae006.Dna imacie007.i no image008.Dna imacie009.Dno image010.Dna imacle011.Dno imaae012.Dna logo-charcoalandoranoe-linear-transparent-email 38c9a8be-ef67-4f1f-b5f3-7cbfaec9ab75. ono 079 sm fb d4769f35-474f-4861-a58e-099aa5cfa8d3.Dna 079 sm in d8061d26-6e17-45d8-b821-e3b73de5d846.ono 079 sm twitter 73f8f4e9-8864-400f-9100-349a7b839898.Dng 079 sm insta b9829f39-ea7b-4ffb-9e4e-d1a11d6e4972.ono ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Please see below Anne from the first meeting. Will send you a separate email with comments from second meeting. Good Neighbor Meeting —September 28, 2022 11 attendees Short presentation given and then Open House w/ Q&A Notes from discussion with the Rew Family: • They have lived in this house for 44 years. Their son lives in the house adjacent to the west, and their daughter lives in the house directly adjacent to their son. Thus, the Rew family resides in the three parcels directly adjacent to our project along Benton Street. * Noted that the proposed Fire Lane/Access on the west side would be right next to their existing drive and they would see a lot of cars in and out every day. • Extremely concerned with the size of the building, and in particular the height (3 stories) that will be 65' from their existing house. Noted the concern of those living in the new building being able to look down into/onto their house. • Concerned that it is student living and the number of units proposed. * They asked about patios overlooking that west side and asked whether there would be windows (and how many) overlooking their house. • They asked if the front units facing Benton could be lowered so that only 1 or 2 stories rather than 3. Or, could the building be pushed back further from the ROW (to the north) so more in line with their garage rather than house. I explained to them that there is a maximum setback from the ROW as part of the zoning code so this was not possible. Concerned with losing sunlight into their property and the view they currently have looking down Benton Street. • They are concerned with affordable housing being provided in this building and would rather see the 10% requirement getting taken care of via fee in lieu of. They would rather not see affordable housing next to them. There was a lot of discussion regarding the drainageway (creek). Turns out, the gentleman loves that the creek is in their backyard and is hoping that can remain in some fashion. His wife has been concerned with erosion along the creek for some time now and fine with that waterway moving away from or off property. The husband noted the best situation would be to keep it as close as possible but improve the waterway by stabilizing and controlling erosion. • Many questions as to screening between the proposed building and their yard/house. Also questions on exterior look, but they did like the idea that this would look more like townhomes/townhouses. Comments from other attendees: • Why one large building? That building is really large. That is too big. • Neighborhood character. Currently older, traditional small-scale houses. They assume new building will have a more modern design appearance and worry about how the two fit (or don't fit) together • Existing "green space" associated with 224, 226, and 230 Orchard Ct is desirable. Micro - neighborhood around those properties. The three buildings to the north can/need to go but the stuff south of those has a feel that fits well in the neighborhood. • Previous rezoning & overall River Front Crossings in Comp Plan protected / buffered the neighborhood by keeping single-family houses along Benton. Transition occurred in back yards. Three story building along Benton will "tower over" the surrounding single-family properties. • The Rews (302 W Benton) felt like the previously approved rezoning was too close and too large but at least the other properties along Benton weren't changing. • Light trespass o Lights from cars entering and exiting building o Light from exterior fixtures around building o Light from windows and decks / balconies on upper floors • Affordable housing o River Front Crossings district incentivizes student housing closer to campus (height bonus if within 1,000 feet) o Miller -Orchard neighborhood seen has a location to reinvest in the existing housing stock rather than replace o Students vs non -student o Displacing existing residents and likely higher rents o Some did NOT want affordable housing as they were concerned with those results in as far as care, look, and those who may live there. • Student housing not seen as a need in this neighborhood or a desirable use • Traffic o There is already a lot of traffic on Benton o Will signals be required? If so, they are really close to Benton / Riverside intersection o What will impacts be to Hudson & Miller Streets? People already use those to cut over to Highway 1. How much worse will this development make it? o Currently appears to be parking shortage because of number of cars ticketed on Orchard Ct • Positive comments The townhouse -style along the southern portion of the building was seen as a positive o Re-aligning/shortening Orchard Ct well received • Eliminating the three buildings (614, 622, 630) seen as OK as it is recognized that those buildings are tired • Several questions on schedule — how soon will this happen? One from a current tenant in one of the rental buildings while others just trying to get an idea on how quickly this is hoping to get pushed through. * How would this project be constructed in terms of phasing/staging of equipment and disruption to the neighboring residents? Thanks, BRIAN BOELK PE, CPESC, CPMSM Owner - Principal - Civil Services Manager XIOMCONSULTANTS CBJ Best of the Corridor 2019-2022 w: axiom-con.com c: 319-400-1056 1100 From: Anne Russett <ARussett@iowa-city.org> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 11:01 AM To: Brian Boelk <bboelk@axiom-con.com>; Michael Welch <Michael@welchdesigndevelopment.com> Subject: RE: [External] Orchard & Benton Rezoning Great. Could you please send me your summaries of the good neighbor meetings? From: Brian Boelk <bboelkPaxiom-con.com> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 10:54 AM To: Anne Russett <ARussettPiowa-citv.org>; Michael Welch <MichaelPwelchdesigndevelopment.com> Subject: RE: Orchard & Benton Rezoning ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Thank you, Anne. We will plan to be in attendance. BRIAN BOELK PE, CPESC, CPMSM Owner - Principal - Civil Services Manager From: Brian Boelk To: Anne Russett; Michael Welch Subject: RE: [External] Orchard & Benton Rezoning Date: Friday, December 16, 2022 7:37:29 AM Attachments: imaae003.ona imaae004.Dna imaae005.Dna imaae006.Dna imaae007.ona imaae014.Dna imaae015.ona imaae016.Dna imaae017.Dna imaae018.Dna logo-charcoalandoranoe-linear-transparent-email 38c9a8be-ef67-4f1f-b5f3-7cbfaec9ab75. ona 079 sm fb d4769f35-474f-4861-a58e-099aa5cfa8d3.Dna 079 sm in d8061d26-6e17-45d8-b821-e3b73de5d846.ona 079 sm twitter 73f8f4e9-8864-400f-9100-349a7b839898.Dna 079 sm insta b9829f39-ea7b-4ffb-9e4e-d1a11d6e4972.ono We sent you safe versions of your files.msa Sian -In Sheet.Ddf ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. Please see below Anne from the second meeting. I have attached the sign -in sheet from the second meeting but unfortunately left the the sign -in sheet from the first meeting at the school and it was never found. Good Neighbor Meeting— November 30, 2022 Open House w/ Q&A • Many compliments and appreciation for the changes made from original one large building to three smaller buildings. • Residents (specifically the Rew family) very excited that the four parcels to the southeast, included in previous plan, no longer part of project or being purchased by Aptitude. • Everyone seemed to really like the townhouse look based on the elevation provided/shown. • Based on changes in layout and parcels involved, several questioned if the existing drainageway would be impacted or included in improvements in any way. • Requests that lighting be evaluated and focus be made on down lighting and least impacts to neighbors as possible. • Several questions about screening, in particular to the west and south. Would this be vegetation only? Residents would like fencing for purpose of screening visually as well as providing safety/security. • Many still have a concern with traffic as several noted existing issues on Benton Street now. How will these additional units/bed impact traffic? How would a signal work at Benton/Orchard knowing there is a signal very close at Benton/Riverside? Will additional R.O.W. or street width be made or wanted in the future. • We noted that a traffic study has been completed, and further evaluation and design will be required to improve the intersection of Benton and Orchard. This may and most likely will consist of traffic signalization and turn lanes on Benton Street. • There was a question as to how many units are existing within these sites based on single family residential and multi family apartments. What is the comparison between existing number of units and proposed number of units. • Several expressed concerns with parking and asked how much parking is to be provided on site. Their concern being that there is not enough on -site parking so residents will park cars on adjacent streets and impact the surrounding neighborhoods. • Questions on intended schedule for start of construction and leases. • Asked if height still the same and we reiterated that City Code limits these buildings to a maximum of 3 stories/floors above ground. • Though some still would rather not have any development to area at all, they were very complimentary and appreciative of the changes made and the new proposed layout and look. Thanks, BRIAN BOELK PE, CPESC, CPMSM Owner - Principal - Civil Services Manager AXIOMCONISULTANTS CBJ Best of the Corridor 2019-2022 w: axiom-con.com c: 319-400-1056 IICI DIM BRIAN BOELK PE, CPESC, CPMSM Owner - Principal - Civil Services Manager AX IOMOONSULTANTS CBJ Best of the Corridor 2019-2022 w: axiom-con.com c: 319-400-1056 130 0 From: Anne Russett <ARussettPiowa-city.org> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 11:01 AM To: Brian Boelk <bboelkPaxiom-con.com>; Michael Welch <Michael@ welchdesigndevelopment.com> Subject: RE: [External] Orchard & Benton Rezoning Great. Could you please send me your summaries of the good neighbor meetings? From: Brian Boelk <bboelkPaxiom-con.com> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2022 10:54 AM To: Anne Russett <ARussettPiowa-city.org>; Michael Welch Late Correspondence December 14, 2022 Anne Russett - Senior Planner City of Iowa City 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240-1826 Re: REZ22-0015 Rezoning Request near Benton Street & Orchard Court. Dear Anne Russett, Please submit the following written comments to the Planning & Zoning Commission in lieu of attendance to the scheduled December 21, 2022 meeting. As a tenant of 627 Orchard Court my primary concern for the planned increased apartment density from rezoning is the parking and traffic that occurs on the limited block and a half street of Orchard Court. That street takes traffic from my 46 unit apartment, some 20 street rental units in the area, plus overflow traffic from some 96 multiple bedroom units in the 629 South Riverside Apartment as well as commercial traffic from the Kum & Go. 629 S. Riverside Apartments have underground parking plus an above ground parking lot with some 85 to 90 spaces. That lot is over parked. Residents park curbside in the egresses as well as on the limited street parking. The 20 independent rental units on the street have cars over parked in the drives blocking sidewalk access while some also park in their yards. No accommodations exists for the numerous Amazon, FedEx, UPS, USPS mail, or Spee-Dee delivery trucks to temporarily park, thus blocking or squeezing egress to a single lane. Plus access for special Cambus services, trash pick-up and commercial traffic from the Kum & Go all contribute to this street fight. Access to Benton Street from Orchard Court can become a challenge and as a result many vehicles cut through the parking lot of Kum & Go. If a traffic light is added to that intersection of Benton and Orchard Ct. I believe, while necessary, will increase the traffic cutting through Kum & Go just to avoid the lights on Riverside Drive and Benton as well as Benton and Orchard. In order for rezoning to occur I believe there needs to be an additional alternate access to the proposed higher density apartments from Benton Street or elsewhere rather than forcing all traffic through Orchard Ct. In addition I think Orchard Ct. should be widened as well as accommodations made for delivery vehicles. As for any future apartments built in the proposed area, parking cannot be minimized. Richard \Test 627 Orchard Ct. #216 Iowa City, IA Anne Russett From: Paula Swygard <pswygard@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 3:11 PM To: Anne Russett Subject: REZ22-0015 ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Anne - please forward to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Thank you. I apologize that I cannot attend the December 21, 2022 Planning and Zoning meeting due to the holidays. The Orchard District was not part of the original Riverfront Crossings plan. It was unnecessarily added to be a transition between higher intensity mixed use area along Riverside Drive and the single family residential homes to the west. So far, the drawings and plans presented at the Good Neighbor Meetings and with REZ22-0015 have been for multi -family housing that appears to use every inch of land to crowd in as much 3 story development as can be squeezed in. P & Z can only rezone the land and has no control over the buildings which are subject to the Riverfront Crossings form -based code. The properties between Riverside Drive to the east of Orchard Street are part of the original Riverfront Crossings Plan and there is the potential for redevelopment in the near future at the southeast corner of Orchard Street since the former Twin Image building is now for sale. If redeveloped, this too will add to the traffic difficulties already anticipated with the rezoning of the area in REZ22-0015. This area, where the former Twin Image building is located, allows 4 stories max, with no bonus height. If this area redevelops at an increased density as permitted in the original Riverfront Crossings Plan, this will add to traffic problems. Keep in mind that Myrtle and Riverside (West Riverfront Subdistrict) was recently rezoned. This project expanded the West Riverfront district and included a Comprehensive Plan amendment, a rezoning from medium density to high density, and an increase in the maximum height bonus. The original plan showed a development that included a mixed - use project with housing, retail, hospitality, and neighborhood service (2 multi -family residential housing units and townhouse -style housing) uses. However, a 650 bed (mix of 1, 2, 3 bedroom units) multi -family (student housing) development is now in the works. If the developer follows the plan as presented at the Good Neighbor Meeting for REZ22-0015, it would potentially add another 187 units (mix of 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units). All of this development doesn't happen in a vacuum, impacting just one intersection. If the Myrtle/Riverside area gets developed at that high density and the Orchard District gets redeveloped at a density that requires signalization of Orchard/Benton, and the Twin Image building gets redeveloped to increase housing density, all of a sudden the density in buildings within several blocks of each other has potentially increased immensely to include over 1,000+ more residents, The majority with cars. That's in addition to the already built apartment buildings: Riverview West (101 units built in 2016) and 627 Orchard Court (Orchard Lofts - 45 units completed in 2018). Traffic in the area is overcapacity. Per staff report, this proposal will "result in substantially more traffic generation." I 1 fail to see how adding more capacity, with a stop light, will improve the traffic congestion already experienced. The recommendation for signalization may require intersection improvements. Recommendation 3.d states "Reconstruct Orchard Street/Court in a manner approved by the City Engineer." Orchard Street just underwent a 2 year reconstruction process, finally completing earlier this month, at great inconvenience to Iowa Citians, especially those living on Douglass Street/Douglass Court who had trouble accessing their homes and who put up with hundreds of cars trapped on their No Outlet streets when drivers were confused by the construction. The most recent traffic study numbers are hard to interpret BUT I can tell you what the congestion is like to experience. And the recent traffic studies have not included the traffic on Orchard, Hudson, and Miller which will all be impacted by the increase in traffic generated by all the multi -family housing being planned. Please refer to the traffic study of those streets completed way back in September 2010 by Johnson County Council of Governments (JCCOG) and a traffic study by MPOJC dated May 2012 completed by then director, John Yapp. Although old, they explored high traffic numbers and traffic calming options back then prior to Riverfront Crossings and the Prairie Hill Co -housing development. Better yet, require a current traffic study of the streets in whole Miller Orchard area instead of focusing just on the intersection of Orchard/Benton and Benton/Riverside It's a given that parking will be inadequate and I, and my neighbors, are concerned that residents of the multi -family housing proposed will store their vehicles on the residential streets of the area including Giblin, Douglass St/Ct, Hudson, and Miller. Tickets for parking violations are already a common occurrence on Orchard Court. The Hwy 1 bus route has stops in this area along Riverside at Myrtle, Kum and Go, McDonalds and near the Dairy Queen. The route will get you to/from Walmart, Aldi's, and out to Walden Square (Fareway and Hartig Drug) and downtown Iowa City. The question is whether the bus route will be able to handle an increase in demand, not only with this rezoning application, but also with the development at Myrtle/Riverside - especially if all of this is student -oriented housing. Most of the current sidewalks were built when the area was first developed and to the standards of that time. They are smaller in scale and close to the street. Retrofitting and adapting them to current standards is challenging. Having lived in the Miller Orchard neighborhood for a long time, I can attest to the fact that many people cut through private property if it is unfenced to find the quickest route available to go between the residential area and the commercial areas along Riverside and the Highway. Sometimes, even fences don't help keep people from cutting through yards. Please consider requiring Opaque Fence or Wall, SS screening between residential properties abutting the Orchard District property for both privacy and security purposes. I think the Orchard District should never have been created as an after -thought to the original Riverfront Crossings Plan (although that ship has sailed). It is intended for LOWER DENSITY residential development. It appears plans are to stick to the 3 story limit but develop at a higher density that will result in too many people being crammed into an area that is not equipped to handle the traffic that will be generated. It's interesting that so many conditions have been put on the property with both the past rezoning request and the current one. That the rezoning would require signalization of an intersection in such close proximity to Benton/Hwy 1 and reconstruction of streets (one that just completed a total reconstruction) is cause for alarm. Thank you for your time, Paula Swygard 2 Anne Russett From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Claire Wofford <ebullientethos@gmail.com> Monday, December 19, 2022 3:38 PM Anne Russett From: Paula Swygard; To: letsknf@netscape.net; CC: Aaron Van Noy; Adam Tatro; Bart Dvorak; Bill Martell; Cameron Harvey; Cathy Fell; Erin Casey; Ga King; Jane Olson; Janet Evans; Joann Whitmore; Kendall Kachura; Kevin Tobin; Linda K; Lynne Doxie; Mal Stroik; Mark Falk; Mark Keehner; Mary Turecek; Michael Sebaaly; S F; S&J F; Susannah Middaugh; Tim Tack; ZemZem; Sanaa; Shweta Rezoning for Orchard development - on to Planning and Zoning Commission ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Hello Anne, My name is Claire Wofford and I live at 315 Douglass St. I am concerned about the new Orchard development and its impact on our neighborhood. Currently there are about 24 units in that neighborhood all with ample parking. The last proposal I saw for the new housing construction increased the housing units to around 96. There is typically more than one vehicle per unit, Let's estimate there will be at least 100 additional cars that will need a place to park. I beg the P and Z commission to require any new housing units constructed to provide a FREE parking space for each bedroom, especially since these are adults living there (not families with children). We are the closest area of street parking. We have a narrow street with parking on one side of the street. We have lots of children playing in our neighborhood. The city does not want houses to add parking spaces to single family units, so most homes have one place to park. We already have people from UIHC and the University parking on our street and walking over to go to work and school. I have witnessed the catastrophe that happened with parking in the neighborhood around the new student housing called The Quarters. During the planning phase, the developers promised plenty of parking for all their units, but changed their plans halfway through the development process, plus started to charge the students for a parking place. The result is the residential area is packed with student parking, even blocking their driveways, blocking fire hydrants, etc, because the students are so desperate for a place to park. Normally Iowa City does such a great job of urban planning. I know that parking is one of Iowa City biggest urban planning issues. Our neighborhood is so sweet. Most all my neighbors are so warm and kind and really have created a wonderful cohesive neighborhood. Please, please, please support our wonderful little community by requiring these developers that are creating high density housing next door, to supply their occupants with plenty of free parking for themselves and their visitors. Claire Wofford 1 20 Dec 2022 Mark Falk 435 Douglass Court Iowa City, Iowa 52246-5405 To Iowa City Planning and Zoning -Commission: My address is 435 Douglass Court. I'm writing to comment on the proposed development adjacent to my neighborhood [Miller/Orchard]. Large apartment buildings are planned for Orchard Street and Court with insufficient free parking provided for the expected number of occupants. I must protest. Without parking provided, these "developments" will flood my nearby neighborhood with those who can't park where they live. This will significantly and negatively impact the nature of our quiet neighborhood. This is for the profit of developers, and is not in the interest the residents of the neighborhood. That profit comes at the expense of our quality of life — for which we will receive no compensation. We already have game day traffic and parking; such density which would only be exacerbated by additional apartment parking. Another "feature" of the proposed construction is the reconstruction of Orchard Street/Court "in a manner approved by the City Engineer". This is absolutely ridiculous. The street is only this fall complete after a lengthy and total reconstruction, at considerable expense and inconvenience. This is a gratuitous waste of tax dollars; surely there are better uses for city funds. If that project was not completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, why was it allowed to proceed? Orchard Street has a stop light at one end already, to add another at Benton Street would mean one could hit three stoplights in 2 blocks distance, which seems excessive. When City planners wanted to impose sidewalks in our neighborhood, our residents appealed to the City Council; we were granted an exception from this "development" plan, based at least in part on the unique nature of our neighborhood. Like a European model, the Douglass Street/Court neighborhood is one where youngsters on bikes and seniors with walkers alike roll and stroll around our circle. My partner is disabled and she uses this Circle as her main exercise venue. If sufficient free parking is not provided for the tenants of these development complexes, we will suffer significant loss of this quality of life, through no doing of our own. Sincerely, Mark Falk Anne Russett From: Sent: To: Subject: letsknf@netscape.net Wednesday, December 21, 2022 5:19 PM Anne Russett RE: Orchard & Benton St Development plan ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Anne, My name is Lindsay Park, and I live at 401 Douglass St. I met you at the first good neighbor meeting at Horn elementary, where I objected to the colossal size of the single complex and the essential removal of all existing trees and greenery that would occur if such a construction were allowed. I did not attend the November meeting, but seeing the revised plans for the development in Paula Swygard's email to us, EZ22-0015 Orchard Street rezoning, I would consider this an improvement in design and scope, and less of a decimation of existing greenspace, including the stream. There is a proposed development north of this area and north of the railroad tracks, which would improve the quality of existing large, old apartment buildings and not remove significant amounts of trees and greenery and which would replace fewer single homes. It also is well served by an existing stop light at the intersection of Riverside and Myrtle. I want to ask the council to explain why The Orchard St project would be prioritized, with an additional stoplight at Benton Street, such a short distance from the busy intersection at Riverside, when better locations for increased density like the one described above would serve that goal while causing fewer problems? Just a final note based on something I observed on the map on page 6 of the EZ22-0015 pdf. It identifies the large areas immediately north and south of Benton St. along the eastern shore of the Iowa River as Green Space. My observation of these spaces however is that they are mostly riddled with ugly stretches of concrete and asphalt ---stuff that no one would ever miss if they were to be removed for better development. These could be transformed into actual greenspace that would be excellent extensions of River Crossings Park. I understand that these lands are not owned by the developers. But I find it interesting that the targeted area for the Orchard St. development is physically more of a greenspace than either of those large plots, and I wish that more plans in general sought to enhance the best qualities such land. Lindsay Park 401 Douglass St. Iowa City, IA 52246 P.S. I did not hear any remarks by anyone at the first meeting rejecting the proposal for including affordable housing. 1 I want affordable housing to be part of any and all such developments, especially if rezoning is being pursued to make the projects qualify. 2 Item Number: 7.d. CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org January 10, 2023 Resolution setting a public hearing for January 24, 2023 to consider the vacation and conveyance of approximately 266 square feet of right-of-way located at the northwest corner of S. Riverside Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railroad to FFI Farms, LLC; Kevin C Kain Revocable Trust; and Lindsay R Kain Revocable Trust. {VAC22-0002) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Preliminary PZ Meeting Minutes Resolution Setting a Public Hearing STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: VAC22-0002 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Contact Person: Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Size: Prepared by: Emani Brinkman, Planning Intern and Anne Russett, Senior Planner Date: October 19, 2022 Shawn Hitchcock Scannell Properties shawnh(a�scannel Iproperties.com Noah Decker & Wade Wamre Shive-Hattery ndecker@shive-hattery.com wwamre@shive-hattery.com City of Iowa City 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 Vacation of the public right-of-way adjacent to Riverside Drive To incorporate area into proposed development Northwest corner of Riverside Drive and Iowa Interstate Railroad right of way 266 Square Feet Existing Land Use and Zoning: Riverfront Crossings — West Riverfront (RFC- WR) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Riverfront Crossings — West Riverfront (RFC-WR) South Public (Iowa Railroad) East: Riverfront Crossings — West Riverfront (RFC-WR) 2 Public Meeting Notification: West: Riverfront Crossings — West Riverfront (RFC-WR) Property owners within 500' of the subject property received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Vacation signs were posted on the site at Riverside Drive. File Date: September 30, 2022 45 Day Limitation Period: NA BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Scannell Properties, submitted a request to vacate approximately 266 square feet of City right-of-way located at the northwest corner of S. Riverside Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railroad. If granted, the vacation would allow for an increase in the developable area of the property at the southwest corner of Myrtle Ave and S. Riverside Drive. The City recently acquired the 266 square feet of land in order to create a pedestrian tunnel under the Iowa Interstate Railroad right-of-way. The project ultimately did not move forward because the Iowa Interstate Railroad had concerns with how the pedestrian tunnel would impact their tracks. The City is still committed to provide a pedestrian connection in this location and is currently working with the Iowa Department of Transportation to make improvements. The plan is to narrow the street to allow for a sidewalk to be placed on the west side of S. Riverside Dr. between the bridge abutment and the curb. This will require narrowing the travel lanes and adding a protected barrier between the new sidewalk and vehicular traffic. ANALYSIS: The following factors are to be considered in evaluating a vacation request: a) Impact on pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation; b) Impact on emergency and utility vehicle access and circulation; c) Impact on access of adjacent private properties; d) Desirability of right-of-way for access or circulation needs; e) Location of utilities and other easements or restrictions on the property; f) Any other relevant factors pertaining to the specific requested vacation. a) Vehicular and pedestrian circulation and access to private property: The right-of-way is mostly paved and previously used to access the now closed commercial uses at 529 and 527 S. Riverside Dr. Access to the properties along the western side of S. Riverside Drive will be maintained with the proposed vacation. The proposed vacation is a relatively small area and access can still be provided to private properties from S. Riverside Dr. The proposed vacation is being requested to increase the buildable area for the proposed student housing development at the southwest corner of Myrtle Ave and S. Riverside Drive. b) Emergency and utility and service access: The right-of-way is not needed to provide public utility services or emergency access to private properties. 3 c) Impact on access of adjacent private properties: Since the City did not construct the planned pedestrian project, this will not affect surrounding properties. The proposed vacation will return property to its previous condition. Specifically, the property was privately held prior to the City purchasing it and the current owners now wish to purchase it back since the City no longer has a need for it. d) Desirability of right of way for access or circulation needs: Staff has determined that there is no need to maintain the right-of-way for access or circulation needs. e) Location of utilities and other easements or restrictions on the property: The right-of-way does not contain any City utilities. Private utilities have been contacted and asked to identify any utilities currently on -site. If the right-of-way is vacated, easements will need to be granted for any utilities that may exist, or alternatively, the utilities will need to be relocated. f) Any other relevant factors pertaining to the specific requested vacation: Staff does not believe there are any other relevant factors pertaining to the specific requested vacation. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the proposed vacation will be reviewed by the City Council. The City Attorney's Office has received a purchase agreement. The City Council will discuss both the proposed vacation and the conveyance of this land. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of VAC22-0002 a vacation of the public right-of-way located at the northwest corner of S. Riverside Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railroad right of way, subject to the retention of any necessary utility easements. ATTACHM ENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Vacation Exhibit Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services +- a.)Q 'c$ 7)r O a) rx 4 o CS 4-0 x o rct -o C vs V) • tea. INDEX LEGEND: LOCATION: PART OF LOT 2 OF A SURVEY IN LOT 3, SECTION 16, T79N, R6W, OF THE 5TH PM. JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA REQUESTOR RIVERFRONT WEST LLC PROPRIETOR: CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA SURVEYOR: WADE D. WAMRE, PLS COMPANY: SHIVE-HATTERY, INC. RETURN TO: 222 3RD STREET SE, SUITE 300 CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401 wwamre(a)shivealattery.com 319-364-0227 PLAT OF SURVEY AUDITOR'S PARCEL NO. 2022062 Part of Lot 2 of a survey in Lot 3, Section 16, Township 79 North, Range 6 West of the 5th P.M., Johnson County, Iowa a1 FND. 1/2" REBAR W/ CAP #15980 FND. 518" REBAR W/ ALUM. CAP FND. 1" IRON PIPE N 00°10'01" W (S 88°40'53" W) -N 89°56'33" E -r 00 Sa 00 z 15e (S 88°55'34" W) N 89°54'24' E (N 74°49'22" E) N 75°36'39" E 7.61' SURVEY LEGEND FND. 3/4" REBAR �P I 25' I,kg, 0 P5 � <` .re I 1--cT� SEE DETAIL'A' 100' Rg'(P�`ROPS) 10`NP t3� • 0 O ( ) POC POB ROW FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED SET 5/8' REBAR W/ ORANGE CAP #17565 SET MAG NAIL RECORDED AS POINT OF COMMENCEMENT DATE OF SURVEY: POINT OF BEGINNING 05/23/2022 RIGHT OF WAY PLAT OR SURVEY BOUNDARY EXISTING LOT LINE VARIES I� 0 0 0 z W POC (S 88°43'48" W) 1 INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE N 89°55'43" E 1 OF LOT 2 OF A SURVEY IN LOT 3, (11.81') SEC. 16, T79N, R6W AND THE WEST 11.81' I ROW OF SOUTH 1 1 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 0 25 1 50 100 ■ IN II IN SCALE IN FEET (N 88°43'48" E) S 89°54'25" W (12.04') 12.04' AREA: 266 SQ.FT. SURVEYOR CONTACT: WADE D. WAMRE, PLS SHIVE-HATTERY, INC. 222 3RD STREET SE, SUITE 300 CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA 52401 PHONE: 319-364-0227 FAX 319-364-4251 wwamre@shIve-hattery.com REQUESTOR: RIVERFRONT WEST LLC ATTN: STEVE LONG 220 SE6TH ST SUITE 200 DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 OWNER CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA 410 E. WASHINGTON STREET IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS CHORD BRG CHORD DELTA (C1) 3772.00' C1 58.78' 3772.00' S 04°22'48" E 58.77' 000°53'34" (C2) 3772.00' C2 18.59' 3772.00' S 03°47'33" E 18.59' 000°18'57" (03) 9363.36' C3 41.40' 9363.36' S 73°22'00" W 41.40' 000°15'12" (C4) 17.29' 21.00' N 48'33'08" E 16.81' 47°10'39" C4 17.29' 21.00' N 49°44'26" E 16.81' 047°10'55" 6.46' 9355.36' N 72.07'17" E 6.18' 00.02'22. C5 6.46' 9355.36' N 73°18'43" E 6.46' 000°02'22" (06) 17.52' 13.00' N 33°29'17" E 16.23' 77°13'36" C6 17.51' 13.00' N 34°38'38" E 16.22' 077°09'19" (07) 152.80' 9363.36' N 72'46'14"E 152.60' 00'56'06" C7 152.85' 9363.36' N 73°5T39" E 152.85' 000°56'07" (C8) 25.09' 3784.00' S 06°11'29" E 25.09' 00°22'48" C8 25.09' 3784.00' S 05'00'04"E 25.09' 000°22'48" BASE OF BEARINGS: IOWA REGIONAL COORDINATE SYSTEM: ZONE 10 CEDAR RAPIDS V " i/ WADE D. *. M? 2 WAMRE. PLS g ; jc- i 17565 �,r 4,M f fOWA I hereby ceWiy that this I lid surveying doaoment was prepared and the related survey work w s performed by under my direct personal supervi 'on and that 1 t duly licensed Land S $)nr der the Lows r th° smayor of Ia"a. gnntnre) (data) WADE D. WAMRE, PLS License number. 1756E My license renewal date is December 31 Pages or sheets covered by this seal. 8 PLAT OF SURVEY - AUDITOR'S PARCEL NO. 2022062 PART OF LOT 2 OF A SURVEY IN LOT 3, SEC. 16, 779N, R6W, OF THE 5TH P.M. Q JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA W DATE 09-20-2022 SCALE hJ D DRAWN can I APPROVED/ FIELD BOOK OT-2022-1 REFERENCE DRAVIING REVISION SHIVEI-IATTERY ARCHITECTURE + E N G I N E E R I N G Iowa I Illinois I Indiana I Missouri htp:Aw,w.enire-helm,ym,n Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 12 of 16 Signs stated notwithstanding his comments about the large cul-de-sac nature of the development, he is in support of it too and thinks it's a fantastic mix and hopes it is developed with the way it's been laid out. Hensch agreed and is generally never in support of cul-de-sacs or bulbs but this is just a tough site and there's not really any other option. Iowa City is running out of developable land and he likes this application. Wade stated he is on board considering the challenge and the topography. It's a nice layout, it looks walkable for the neighborhood and it's nice to see the commercial area whether that ends up as a coffee shop or whatever, it's a draw to the neighborhood. Padron also stated she supports this development. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. REZ22-0015: Location: North of W. Benton Street and west of Orchard Street An application for a rezoning of approximately 3.52 acres of land from Low Density Single Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) and Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0) to Riverfront Crossing - Orchard (RFC-0). Russett stated the applicant has requested a deferral to January 4, the next commission meeting, staff is still working through some conditions with them. Signs moved defer application REZ22-0015 to the January 4 meeting. Elliott seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. VAC22-0002: Location: Northwest corner of S. Riverside Dr. and the Iowa Interstate Railroad An application for a vacation of approximately 266 square feet of public right-of-way to increase the developable area for the proposed redevelopment at the southwest corner of Myrtle Avenue and S. Riverside Drive. Russett explained this is a vacation of 266 square feet of public right-of-way along South Riverside Drive. The area is just north of the Iowa Interstate Railroad. Russett showed the zoning map of the area noting this is a public right-of-way. The background on this vacation is the City recently acquired this 266 square feet and the purpose of that acquisition was to help with installing a pedestrian tunnel under the Iowa Interstate Railroad, however that project is not going to be moving forward because there were concerns from the Railroad regarding the tunnel Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 13 of 16 under their right-of-way. The City is still committed to providing a pedestrian connection on the west side of South Riverside Drive so now the City is working with the Iowa DOT to narrow the street along South Riverside Drive and install a sidewalk between the curb and the bridge abutment. She added this will also include some type of protective barrier for pedestrians in that area. So again, there will eventually be a pedestrian connection, but it will not be a tunnel and therefore the City no longer needs this 266 square feet right-of-way, so the property owner is asking that it be returned to private property. Russett noted the Commission saw this rezoning several months ago for proposed development on the corner of Myrtle and Riverside Drive and returning this right-of-way to the property owner adds a little bit a square foot to their buildable area. Russett stated there are several criteria that need to be reviewed when looking at a vacation of public right-of-way and staff has reviewed all of these criteria and find that they have all been met. The first criteria is that whether or not there's an impact on pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation. She reiterated this is a very small area, only 266 square feet, and pedestrian and vehicle access will not be impacted through the vacation. The second is will there be any impacts on emergency and utility vehicle access and circulation. Russett confirmed this right-of-way is not needed to provide any utility services or emergency services to the site. The next criteria is impact on access of adjacent private properties and there will be no impact as this vacation essentially returns the property to its previous condition, which is private ownership and not public right-of-way. Next is the desirability of the right-of-way for access or circulation needs and since the pedestrian tunnel is no longer a viable option for that pedestrian connection there's no need for the City to maintain that right-of-way. Next is the location of utilities and other easements or restrictions on the property and there are no City utilities within this 266 square feet. Russet stated private utilities have been contacted and she didn't hear back from any with concerns about the vacation and staff has not found any other relevant factors pertaining to this specific vacation request. Staff is recommending approval VAC22-0002 a vacation of public right-of-way located at the northwest corner of South Riverside Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railroad right-of-way. In terms of next steps, City Council will need to set a public hearing and staff anticipates the public hearing to be on January 24 where Council will consider both the vacation and conveyance of the right-of-way. Craig assumes the City paid for it and now the property owner will have to pay for it back. Russett confirmed that's correct. Wade asked if the tunnel that was previously going to go through there is completely off the table, is there ever a chance that that's going to be revisited. Russett doesn't believe so, the City had been working with the Railroad for quite a while trying to address concerns but at this point feels it is not going to work so they're working with the DOT for an alternate design. Wade noted this is going to increase the need, right now people are sneaking through on the street or on that little gravel portion which is pretty dangerous. Planning and Zoning Commission December 21, 2022 Page 14 of 16 Elliott asked if there is a timeframe for the alternative. Russett is unsure but can ask Public Works. Craig asked what's the status of the development on the site. Russett stated they are currently going through the final platting process, design review and site plan review and then the final plat will go to City Council. Hensch opened the public hearing. Kirsten Frey (attorney, Shuttleworth and Ingersoll) is representing the applicant stated she has been working with Sara Hekteon recently on the purchase agreement for the 266 square feet of right-of-way that was originally acquired in connection with a tunnel that's not going to get built. She acknowledged they are planning to pay for the acquisition of the right-of-way. Hensch closed the public hearing. Wade moved to recommend approval VAC22-0002 a vacation of public right-of-way located at the northwest corner of South Riverside Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railroad right-of-way. Padron seconded the motion. Wade noted the only comment he had was the concern if there was an opportunity that it might be revisited by the railroad, he'd be reserved in making the sale but it sounds like that's out of scope. Signs noted he is in support of the vacation item but wanted to take the opportunity to comment in general on the development. As he has discussed at a previous meeting, he is extremely disappointed to learn that the proposed project for this property has been converted to a student housing project, which is not at all what was presented to this Commission and it has gotten some of the commissioners thinking about ways they can avoid that in the future. Craig agrees with Signs and this project was just not done in good faith. Hensch agrees but noted they know with any rezoning anything that is presented to them is just a concept and they have to think about the all the possibilities that could be constructed within that particular rezoning. Padron supports this vacation and has the same feelings regarding the senior housing becoming student housing. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 Resolution No. 23-14 Resolution setting a public hearing for January 24, 2023 to consider the vacation and conveyance of approximately 266 square feet of right-of-way located at the northwest corner of S. Riverside Drive and the Iowa Interstate Railroad to FFI Farms, LLC; Kevin C Kain Revocable Trust; and Lindsay R Kain Revocable Trust. (VAC22-0002) Whereas, FFI Farms, LLC; Kevin C Kain Revocable Trust; and Lindsay R Kain Revocable Trust, owners of property at 215 S Riverside Ct, have requested that the City vacate an approximately 266 square foot portion of right-of-way and convey it to them to facilitate the redevelopment of the southwest corner of Myrtle Ave and S. Riverside Drive; and Whereas, at its meeting on December 21, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the vacation; and Whereas, Staff has determined that this portion of right-of-way serves no benefit to the public and recommends approval of the vacation and conveyance; and Whereas, in the event that Council approves the vacation, it is in the public interest to convey the vacated right-of-way by quit claim deed to the abutting property owners, FFI Farms, LLC; Kevin C Kain Revocable Trust; and Lindsay R Kain Revocable Trust, for fair market value. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council does hereby declare its intent to consider the vacation and conveyance of approximately 266 square feet of right-of-way to FFI Farms, LLC; Kevin C Kain Revocable Trust; and Lindsay R Kain Revocable Trust via quit claim deed for $11,900. 2. A public hearing on said proposal should be and is hereby set for January 24, 2023, at 6:00 p.m. in Emma Harvat Hall at City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be published as provided by law with the costs assessed to the applicant. Passed and approved this loth day of January Approved by/ G City Attor y's Office - 01/04/2023 MOR ATTEST: , 2023. Resolution No. 2, — Page Z — and seconded by It was moved by The Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent X Alter X Bergus — Dunn X Harmsen X Taylor —X----- Teague X Thomas Item Number: 11. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution approving the conveyance of a private sanitary sewer easement to Metro Pavers, Inc. adjacent to Lot 1, Metro Pavers, 1st Addition. Prepared By: Sara Greenwood Hektoen, Ass't. City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Fiscal Impact: none Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Plat Executive Summary: In order to facilitate development of a newly subdivided lot, the CI ty has been asked to dedicate a private sanitary sewer easement to the adjacent property owner for its sanitary service line. This easement will allow connection to the public sanitary sewer system in the most efficient location and is in an area immediately west of the terminus of Southgate Ave. that is intended to be dedicated as right-of-way, at which time this easement would be terminated. This easement area is encumbered with other easements. For these reasons, Staff recommends conveying this easement for $0. Background /Analysis: ATTACHMENTS: Description Plat Resolution FOR COUNTY RECORDER'S USE LOCATION: SURVEY REQUESTED 5Y: A PORTION OF LOT 12 OF KENNE.OY'S WATERFRONT ADDITION - PART THREE IN THE NORTHWEST ouARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGER WEST. OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL. MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. METRO PAVERS INC PO BOX 250a IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244.2508 LAND SURVEYOR' PROPRIETOR OR OWNER RICHARD R. NOWUTNY PIS MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 SOUTH GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PHONE. 319-351•B287 CITY OF IOWACITY 110 E WASHINGTON STREET IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 DOCUMENT RETURN INFORMATION: DATE OF SURVEY. LAND SURVEYOR 07-12-2912 LOT 112 WEL E DJ I'e ii f da f 1. u'1 1ONY ADDOTQ IN VMS+GiT TWEE IN . 2 4Z W11I 171E FLAT .FENREfr RF10RPEP iN PLAr (S.'7f+1C 25 Ar FAEG yi 62 200 REPOR176 GP TOE 20tt22LN C42-1,11-f 1FLLEDF}t5 OFFICE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE Ns\EASEMENT 689 SF 573'54'46"E 10.12' r T- NI6'05'12'E' S01'02'10"E 46.42 tO -i I 7s.s5• S16'05'12"W 7.23' S89T12'29°W. 20.92' POINT OF BEGINNING °I7UIfI='1''a0Il KENNLDY'S P AI G3EG°DL r �'^�MMOI, - PANT THREE IN AG`0GRDNY� 'ENE k FIAT TEHRECE RFi(RDFL IN RAT' DON W. At" PAL=f 51 62 THE FELL Or TIE .17-NGBN GGUN Y REUF 9W5 OFFICE 0s 2s so GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET S CO DM CAVE A\fi J POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1.2 11 1J EASEMENT PLAT PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA LEGEND AND NOTES - PROPERTY &for BOUNDARY LINES CONGRESSIONAL SECTION UNES -------------- RIGHT-OF-WAY UNES - CENTER LINES - LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED - EASEMENT LINES, WDTH 8 PURPOSE NOTED - EXISTING EASEMENT UNES, PURPOSE NOTED IR - RECORDED DIMENSIONS 0-0- MEASURED DIMENSIONS C22-1 - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER UNLESS NOTED ORERISE, AU. DIMDI9CNS ARE IN r91 MID RUNDREOTHS EASEMENT I DENT FICATION TABLE LABEL DESCRIPTION (`) EO9TIN6 30 rota' WIFE: GOh1EERVATIGN Nil WHISWAY rASEME\T �js 5xr-TINr5 24/ roar WEE STORM SEWER 210`-Galt (3i E021rINO 15 r0172 WIPE WATER. MAIN Alf, UTILITY EA0F1.FNr ® F5051-121* Fi 2001 WIPE UTILITY EA`5EAENW ID PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EASEMENT DESCRIPTION - PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EASEMENT Commencing at the Southeast Corner of Lot 12 of Kennedy's Waterfront Addition - Part Three, to Iowa City, Iowa, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 36 at Page 52 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S89`02'29"W, along the South Line of said Lot 12, a distance of 2,13 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing 589°02'29"W, along said South Line, 20.92 feet; Thence N16°05'12"E, 45.42 feet; Thence S73°54'48"E, 10.12 feet, to a Point on the East Line of said Lot 12; Thence S01"02'10"E, along said East Line, 33.55 feet; Thence 516°05'12"W, 7.23 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said Private Sanitary Sewer Service Easement contains 689 square feet, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. gv; j� BlAllltlttl8l :AR R. NOWO 17916 INA " Ja One SEAL °°A- 'rfrig _-<_ t, �ij I hereby certify that this land surveying document was prepared and the related survey work was performed by me or under my direct personal supervision d that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the a of the of Iowa.7 / , `O"Cam` 20 RICKARD R. NOWOTNY �-- P.LS. Iowa Lic. No. 1 918 Z My license renewal data is December 31, 20 �..... Pages or sheets covered by this seal: f M M CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS 1917 S. GILBERT ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 (319)351-8282 www.mmsoonsultants.net Date I Re4slon 0911612022 PER RRN REVIEW - LSS 1111612022 PER CITY REVIEW - LSS EASEMENT PLAT PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. Data 09-13-2022 Designed by, RLA Drawn by. RLW Checked by. RRN Project No: IC 0112-057 Field Bock No: 1346 Scale: 1 "=50' Sheet No: of: 1 fee, JOHNSON COUNTY 1111111 IIII 1111 II 1111 111 1111111 11 11111 1111 Doc ID 032027870009 Type GEN Kind EASEMENT Recorded: 01/24/2023 at 10:10:15 AM Fee Amt: $47.00 Page 1 of 9 Johnson County Iowa Kim Painter County Recorder BK6454 PG598-606 STATE OF IOWA ) ) SS ) ► pity of AC I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Resolution attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. 23-15 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the loth day of January 2023, all as the same appears of record in my office. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this � ' day of January 2023. 1' P . LL(I :: Kellie K. Fruehling City Clerk \res 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, [OVA 52240-1826 • (319) 356-5000 • FAX (319) 356-5009 Prepared by: Sara Hektoen, Assistant City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030 Resolution No. 23-15 Resolution approving the conveyance of a private sanitary sewer easement to Metro Pavers, Inc. adjacent to Lot 1, Metro Pavers, 1st Addition. Whereas, Metro Pavers, Inc. (Subdivider) desires to construct a building on its property legally described as Lot 1, Metro Pavers, First Addition; and Whereas, pursuant to Iowa City Code of Ordinances 16-3D-5, Subdivider is required to connect the building to the proper public sanitary sewer; and Whereas, the nearest point of connection to the public sanitary sewer system from the new building is located on City -owned property immediately west of the western terminus of Southgate Avenue, which is anticipated to be dedicated as public right-of-way; and Whereas, connection to the public sewer system in this location is the most efficient connection point, as it will avoid the need to remove and replace street pavement; and Whereas, it is in the public interest to grant a non-exclusive easement to Subdivider for the purpose of connecting its building to the public sanitary sewer system in this location; and Whereas, this location is anticipated to be dedicated as public right-of-way at such time as the roadway is extended; and Whereas, pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 16-3D-6F, the service line must be maintained at Subdivider's expense; and Whereas, this easement area is encumbered with other easements, and for these reasons, the conveyances should be for $0; and Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and attest all documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney, necessary to convey a private sanitary sewer easement to Metro Pavers, Inc. for the price of $0. 2. The City Attorney is hereby authorized to carry out any actions necessary to consummate the conveyance as required by law, and to have any and all necessary documents recorded with the Johnson County Recorder at the Subdivider's expense. Passed and approved this i nth day of J„yary , 2023. Mayor Resolution No. 71_ 14 Page 2 Approved by/ ^� City Attor ey's Office — 01/05/2023 Attest: Resolution No. 23-15 Page 3 It was moved by Bergus and seconded by Dunn The Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent X Alter X Bergus X Dunn X Harmsen X Taylor X Teague X Thomas Item Number: 15. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign a State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) grant agreement with Shelter House to administer the Housing Stability Pilot program. Prepared By: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Fiscal Impact: The City has been allocated $18,325,190 in ARPA-SLFRF funds. This agenda item would authorize expenditure of $1,137,710 of those funds. It also authorizes $30,000 in FY23 Affordable Housing Funds (and it is anticipated to be at this same level in FY24 and FY25). Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Housing Stability Pilot Resolution Agreement Executive Summary: As part of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), the City was awarded State and Local Fiscal Recovery funds (SLFRF) dollars to respond to the COVI D-19 pandemic. This resolution authorizes a subrecipient agreement with Shelter House for $1,137,710 to administer the Housing Stability Pilot program aimed at preventing homelessness through eviction prevention and diversion, and improving housing retention through increased partnerships and support. This resolution further authorizes the City Manager to amend the agreement as needed, including the budget for each of these activities by up to 10%. Background /Analysis: In 2021-22 the City of Iowa City received $18.3 million in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) State and Local Relief Funds. After dedicating several months in 2021 gathering public input, the City Council generally agreed to guiding principles and numerous priorities for investing these funds back into our community. To date, several important initiatives have commenced. Shelter House submitted a proposal for a Housing Stability Pilot program that aims to ensure a more efficient and effective homeless response system while preventing homelessness through eviction prevention and diversion and improving housing retention through increased partnerships. This initiative fits clearly in the City Council's ARPA priority for eviction prevention under the Emergent Needs category. The proposal further speaks to the City's guiding principles of leveraging partnerships and outside funding as well as meeting the Council's strategic planning strategy to address the unique needs of vulnerable populations. The proposed Housing Stability Pilot program consists of three activities that are outlined in the Agreement and will be carried out simultaneously for three consecutive years. The City will be providing these services through the City's one-time allocation of ARPA dollars. The Pilot project, with the exception of the landlord risk mitigation fund, will serve clients within Johnson and Washington Counties. When these federal funds expire, the project will need funding from other jurisdictions to sustain this level of services. The City is not anticipated to have the ability to continue this level of financial support beyond this grant. Activity #1 - Coordinated Entry: Funds will be used for salary, benefits and associated costs of one FTE (full-time equivalent) Coordinated Entry Specialist as well as a translation subscription service. Coordinated Entry is the first point of contact for homeless individuals and families. While it is a HUD -mandated program, HUD does not provide administrative funds for this role. The Coordinated Entry Specialist will answer phone calls and meet with people in person to complete assessments to determine household need. They will also be responsible for organizing and holding biweekly meetings with community -based housing providers to prioritize households and assign to the appropriate housing intervention. Activity #2 - Housing Stabilization Services: Funds will be used for salary, benefits, and associated costs of two FTEs Housing Stability Support Specialists. Housing stabilization services provided by these positions will include: • Housing Navigation: Expansion of housing search and location services, arranging apartment viewings, ongoing outreach and relationship building with local landlords and property managers, and support through the lease -up process to support households for whom eviction is imminent. • RentWise: Restart the tenant education series RentWise to increase prospective renters' success in all aspects of the rental experience. Offer eight courses annually throughout the duration of the Pilot. • Landlord Risk Mitigation: Establish and administer a landlord risk mitigation fund to incentivize private landlords to rent to households with limited income, poor rental or credit histories, and/or a criminal background. Funds may cover excessive damages to a rental unit, lost rent, or legal fees beyond those covered by a security deposit up to $3,500. Funds will be paid through Iowa City's Affordable Housing Fund which currently budgets $30,000 for this program. This resolution would authorize annual payment of those funds to Shelter House for the amount budgeted by City Council. Eligibility for risk mitigation funds will initially be limited to landlords renting to households engaged in a local Rapid Rehousing program, households supported by Mainstream Vouchers or Emergency Housing Vouchers, Permanent Supportive Housing providers, and other not -for -profits offering supported housing to extremely low-income (0-30% of the Area Median Income) households. Units must be located within the City of Iowa City municipal boundary. Activity #3 - Eviction Prevention and Diversion: Funds will be used for salary, benefits, and associated costs of two FTE Eviction Prevention and Housing Stabilization Specialists who will provide the following services: • Financial assistance (rent and utility arrears) with onsite application that integrates with existing Coordinated Entry efforts to avoid duplication of efforts. • Landlord -Tenant education, relationship building and conflict management. • Needs assessments, service navigation, application for mainstream benefits including but not limited to SNAP, Johnson County General Assistance, the Housing Choice Voucher Program, and SSI/SSDI. • Increased outreach and education to landlords on eviction prevention. • Utilization of Rapid Rehousing funds as needed to relocate households where possible after all other avenues have been exhausted. Under Activity #3 Shelter House will subcontract with Iowa Legal Aid to provide a Legal Aid Clinic at the Johnson County Courthouse and $30,000 will be used to hold quarterly Expungement Clinics to reduce and remove criminal records that disproportionately affect people of color and pose barriers to housing, employment, and licensure. The proposed budget for each Activity is as follows: Budgeted Items FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Total Activity#1 Coordinated Entry Coordinated Entry Specialist (1 FTE) including salary and benefits, equipment and IT, supplies and subscription to translation service. $33,312 $67,350 $70,195 $33,313 $204,350 Activity#2 Housing Stabilization Services Housing Stability Specialists (2 FT Es) including salary and benefits, equipment and IT, materials and supplies, and transportation costs. $64,450 $130,410 $135,430 $64,450 $394,740 Activity#3 Eviction Prevention and Diversion Eviction Prevention Supportive Services (2 FT Es) including salary and benefits, equipment and IT, printing and supplies, transportation. $63,950 $129,410 $134,430 $63,950 $391,740 Iowa Legal Aid Expungement Clinic $15,000 $30,000 $30,000 $15,000 $90,000 Administration and Reporting $9,9300 $18,805 $19,475 $9,300 $56,800 Total for Fiscal Year $186,012 $376,155 $389,530 $186,013 $1,137,710 The U.S. Treasury permits the city to make subawards with SLFRF funds for the purpose of carrying out an eligible use under the SLFRF program. Per 31 CFR 35.6(b)(2)(i), households experiencing increased housing instability are presumed eligible and per 31 CFR 35.6(b)(3)0i) emergency housing assistance services are an enumerated eligible use of SLFRF funds. Thus, the administration of an eviction prevention program such as the Housing Stability Pilot program addresses the impacts of COVID-19 and is an eligible use of SLFRF funds. ATTACHMENTS: Description Housing Stability Pilot Resolution Agreement HOUSING STABILITY PILOT (Submitted by Shelter House) Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Shelter House has disbursed $1.16 million in emergency rental assistance, preventing the eviction of 583 households (nearly one thousand individuals) and avoiding the traumatic experience of homelessness. COVID-19 disproportionately impacted communities of color, and local data show that efforts to ensure emergency rental assistance reached households most in need have been successful: 90% of households receiving assistance indicated they fall into the "extremely low- income" range (0-30% AMI), 67% of households identify as Black and 11% identify as Hispanic. The Housing Stability Pilot Program, then, is not just the work of equity; rather, it is the work of narrowing wealth gaps that have become chasms. It is the work of anti -racism. Diane Yentel, President and CEO of the National Low Income Housing Coalition notes that "... decades of structural racism created tremendous racial disparities in housing and homelessness. African Americans represent thirteen percent of the general population but are forty percent of people experiencing homelessness and more than fifty percent of homeless families with children." While living and working within the very system that created these disparities, we do not have the luxury of pontificating nor are we content to wring our hands and decry its brokenness. As providers of essential, life-saving services, it is incumbent upon us to find ways to meet the needs of individuals and families now, and in every way we can, not just despite, but because this broken system requires it. This pilot is a response to systemic disparities and an expansion of effective tools that combat their perpetuation. Beginning in 2020, federal funds that passed to the state of Iowa were combined with local public and private funds to seed a series of new services. This pilot, if funded, would not only maintain this higher level of service provision, but would allow for growth in response to recognized gaps and lessons learned. The potential for long-term impact here should not be understated. The recommendations in this document are intended to inform the implementation of a three-year Housing Stability Pilot (January 2023 — December 2025) that will ensure a more efficient and effective homeless response system while preventing homelessness through eviction prevention and diversion and improving housing retention through increased partnerships and support. The pilot will incorporate the following project components which, while presented individually, work in combination to achieve the intended goals: 1) Coordinated Entry, 2) Housing Stability Services, and 3) Eviction Prevention and Diversion. Budgets are provided for each individual component and then summarized at the end of the proposal. Coordinated Entry Shelter House seeks funding for 1FTE Coordinated Entry Specialist. Coordinated Entry is a system designed to ensure all people experiencing a housing crisis have fair and equal access to housing interventions and are quickly identified, assessed, referred, and connected to housing assistance based on each household's strengths and needs. Shelter House is the designated point of contact for any community member experiencing a housing crisis. Dedicated staff answer phone calls and meet with people in person to complete assessments to determine household need. Shelter House organizes and holds bi-weekly meetings with community -based housing providers during which households are prioritized and assigned to the appropriate available housing intervention. These range in intensity of services, from Eviction Prevention and Rapid Rehousing to Permanent Supportive Housing. The system is efficient, ensures households receive the right level of assistance, prevents over -utilization of resources, and avoids duplication of effort between agencies. At the provider level, Coordinated Entry remains an unfunded HUD mandate. 1 Shelter House received a one-year CDBG-CV grant for 1FTE Coordinated Entry Specialist from the City of Iowa City in the fall of 2020. While these public dollars were fully expended by September 2021, Shelter House has continued to staff this activity at its own expense, funded through private fundraising. The agency has grown substantially over the past year, most significantly through the opening of a 36- unit permanent supportive housing facility with significant monthly debt service obligations. Shelter House can no longer self -fund the Coordinated Entry Specialist without new and dedicated investment. Budget Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Coordinate Entry Specialist Salary and Benefits (1FTE) $60,375 $62,790 $65,300 $188,465 Equipment and IT $2,950 $1,290 $1,290 $5,530 Supplies $300 $300 $300 $900 Translation Service* $3,000 $3,150 $3,305 $9,455 Total: $66,625 $67,530 $70,195 $204,350 *This is the cost of an agency -level subscription to Boost Lingo. Shelter House will leverage this investment, making the tool available for Housing Stability and Eviction Prevention and Diversion Services at no additional cost. Housing Stabilization Services Shelter House proposes combining new services and expanding previously piloted activities. This will enhance housing stability for two vulnerable categories of residents: households at statistically higher risk of losing housing as well as households perceived as higher risk prospective renters by landlords and property managers because of past rental history, credit issues, and/or criminal background. These activities will require 2FTE's Housing Stability Support Specialists. Housing Navigation A key component of Shelter House Rapid Rehousing Services is housing navigation. This consists of housing search and location services, arranging apartment viewings, ongoing outreach and relationship building with local landlords and property managers, and support throughout the lease -up process. Currently, this support is limited to households meeting HUD Categories 1 and 4 of Homelessness. If funded, Shelter House would expand services to support households for whom eviction is imminent (HUD Category 2 of Homelessness). RentWise RentWise is a tenant education series intended to increase prospective renters' success managing the landlord/tenant relationship, and in all aspects of the rental experience. Households exiting homelessness who may be perceived as higher risk renters participate in facilitated lessons led by RentWise trainers covering: 1) Communication and Conflict Resolution, 2) Money Management, 3) Housing Navigation and Location Services, 4) Getting Through the Rental Process, 5) Taking Care of Your Home, and 6) When You Move Out. RentWise was initially piloted by the Local Homeless Coordinating Board in 2019. Johnson County Social Services facilitated much of the initial outreach to Nebraska RentWise in 2019, and they provided initial startup funding for materials and participant incentives. A few staff from LHCB partner organizations were 2 trained in leading the RentWise course, and Shelter House taught several full courses prior to the onset of the pandemic. Shelter House is seeking dedicated funding to restart RentWise locally for the duration of the Pilot with a goal of eight courses offered annually with 15-20 participants intended for each course. Initial project implementation will focus on outreach and marketing to local landlords and property management companies. Emergency Housing Voucher Tenant Support As a part of the American Rescue Plan, HUD made Emergency Housing Vouchers available to qualifying Housing Authorities across the nation. The Iowa City Housing Authority now administers these 69 Emergency Housing Vouchers, assigned through Coordinated Entry. While qualifying households for these targeted Vouchers were not required to meet the same high threshold of need as those qualifying for Mainstream Vouchers (MSV), the application of the Vouchers through Coordinated Entry —as mandated by HUD —meant EHVs went to those in highest need of ongoing housing support. Shelter House saw no categorical differences between households receiving EHVs and those receiving typical MSVs. When analyzed in concert with limited Permanent Supportive Housing capacity, this meant households awarded EHVs were more consistent than not with MSV and PSH tenants, demonstrating intersecting needs that included complex health and behavioral health challenges. Experience has shown that EHV households would benefit from additional, ongoing supports. Furthermore, when assured these critical supports to better address systemic health challenges and life needs, EHV households historically have, and likely would, demonstrate a higher rate of housing retention that would not be possible absent the supports provided by Shelter House's PSH programs. This need exceeds the current capacity of both the Iowa City Housing Authority and Shelter House. Shelter House proposes increasing supportive services for these households through this pilot. Risk Mitigation Fund Risk Mitigation funds are a form of guarantee to landlords that are a proven and effective tool for engaging property owners, incentivizing them to rent to households with limited income, poor rental or credit histories, or a criminal background. The funds can cover excessive damages to a rental unit, lost rent (leveraging Homelessness Prevention funds for lost rent may be preferable), or legal fees beyond those covered by a security deposit. Reimbursement limits are set in advance, and landlords submit a claim for reimbursement following a prescribed process. Shelter House proposes to establish and administer a risk mitigation fund in an interest -bearing account to be held in trust at a local bank, capitalized by the City of Iowa City at $30,000. Once funded and given sufficient staff support, the fund would be available according to the following schedule: • Years 1 and 2: Landlords renting to households engaged in a local Rapid Rehousing Program, households supported by Mainstream Vouchers (MSV) or Emergency Housing Vouchers (EHV), Permanent Supportive Housing providers, and other not -for -profits offering supported housing to extremely low-income (0-30% AMI) households. • Years 3 and 4: Extended to landlords serving Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) households. If the pilot is successful and ongoing funds are made available, the community should assess the benefits and requirements to extend eligibility to landlords renting at FMR to households at or below 60% AMI. Landlords would apply to be part of the Risk Mitigation fund for a specific unit rented to a specific authorized household as an additional security beyond the rental security deposit. Landlords will pay a set fee to apply for and have a property/renter combination certified as eligible. Photos and/or an initial inspection of the property must be included in the application and documented. Once approved, the landlord will receive a certificate for that tenant/unit. Claims will be capped at an amount based on the total fund value, generally expected to be approximately $3,500 per certificate. 3 Claims for damage are submitted to Shelter House, and a qualified rental inspector will inspect the unit and issue a report. Shelter House will review the inspection and, depending on the result, pay or deny the claim. If a landlord disagrees with the claim, they have the right to challenge the disallowance to a neutral arbiter once. A second denial is final. Budget Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Housing Stability Services Salary and Benefits (2FTE's) $120,750 $125,580 $130,600 $376,930 Equipment and IT $5,900 $2,580 $2,580 $11,060 Materials and Supplies $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $4,500 Transportation $750 $750 $750 $2,250 Total: $128,900 $130,410 $135,430 $394,740 The preceding budget does not include: • Funds necessary to capitalize and maintain the Risk Mitigation Fund balance, proposed to be initially established at $30,000. • Incentives to participate and meals for RentWise participants during trainings; private foundations and grantors will be solicited to cover these expenses. Eviction Prevention and Diversion Shelter House seeks to continue the Eviction Prevention and Diversion services initiated in response to the pandemic and in collaboration with Iowa Legal Aid. The initial iteration of Eviction Prevention and Diversion assumed there would be very limited need for staff intervention and ongoing support for households seeking prevention services and financial assistance. Experience has demonstrated otherwise. The acute crisis of eviction experienced by the majority of households previously served through local Eviction Prevention and Diversion services was not the result of a single event or loss of income; rather, it was caused by the culmination of a complex array of challenges which could be better addressed through wrap -around services delivered by experienced staff available to assist with everything from service navigation, guidance and support with applying for mainstream benefits such as SSI and SSDI, ongoing education regarding tenant rights, and facilitation of landlord/tenant relationship building. Shelter House has dedicated 1FTE to Eviction Prevention and Diversion services for the better part of two years; however, funding for this position ends December 31, 2022. Shelter House seeks funding for 2FTE's Eviction Prevention and Housing Stability Specialists. Shelter House will continue to provide payments for rental and utility arrears and with 2FTE's would better ensure comprehensive wrap -around services for assisted households. These services include: 1. Financial assistance (rent and utility arrears) with on -site application that integrates with existing Coordinated Entry efforts to avoid duplication of effort. 2. Landlord -Tenant education, relationship building, and conflict management. 3. Needs assessments, service navigation, application for mainstream benefits including but not limited to SNAP, Johnson County General Assistance, the HCV program, and SSUSSDI (Shelter House staff will be trained in SOAR). 4 4. Increased outreach to landlords. Through the course of the pandemic response, Shelter House has grown landlord relations to include a network of over 300 landlords and property managers. Shelter House will continue this extensive outreach with the goal of educating landlords and preventing them from filing FEDs. 5. Iowa Rapid Rehousing funds will be leveraged when needed to relocate households where possible and after all other avenues have been exhausted. This proposal is predicated on the continued collaboration with Iowa Legal Aid with the maintenance of the on -site Legal Aid Clinic at the Johnson County Courthouse originated during the pandemic response and possible growth in capacity. Attorneys will work with households referred by Shelter House that require legal intervention and support. Assistance will include, but not be limited to, credit repair, garnishments, child support, paternity disestablishment where appropriate, taxes, and habitability adjudication. If funded, Iowa Legal Aid would host Expungement Clinics to be held quarterly with the goal of reducing and removing criminal records that disproportionately affect people of color and pose continued barriers to housing, employment, and licensure. Budget Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Eviction Prevention and Diversion Rent and Utility Arrears * * * * Supportive Services Salary and Benefits (2FTE's) $120,750 $125,580 $130,600 $376,930 Equipment and IT $5,900 $2,580 $2,580 $11,060 Printing & Supplies $750 $750 $750 $2,250 Transportation $500 $500 $500 $1,500 Iowa Legal Aid Expungement Clinic $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $90,000 Total: $157,900 $159,410 $164,430 $481,740 *Funds for Rent and Utility Arrears will be leveraged from the Iowa Rapid Rehousing Project administered by the Iowa Finance Authority with $250,000 per year. 5 Summary Pilot Budget Budget Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Coordinate Entry Specialist $66,625 $67,530 $70,195 _ $204,350 Housing Stability Services $128,900 $130,410 $135,430 $394,740 Eviction Prevention and Diversion Services $157,900 $159,410 $164,430 $481,740 Administration, Reporting and Management (5% of total request) $18,600 $18,805 $19,475 $56,880 Pilot Total: $372,025 $376,155 $389,530 $1,137,710 6 Prepared by: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5230 Resolution no. 23-16 Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign a State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) grant agreement with Shelter House to administer the Housing Stability Pilot program. Whereas, the Housing Stability Pilot ("Pilot"), a program of Shelter House, seeks to ensure a more efficient and effective homeless response system while preventing homelessness through eviction prevention and diversion and improving housing retention through increased partnerships; and Whereas, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on housing stability; and Whereas, the U.S. Department of Treasury allocated the City funds through the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund ("SLFRF") as part of the American Rescue Plan Act (aka, ARPA) to meet local needs; and Whereas, federal regulations permit the City to make subawards with SLFRF funds for the purpose of carrying out an eligible use under the SLFRF program; and Whereas, households experiencing housing insecurity are presumed eligible and emergency housing assistance services are an enumerated use of SLFRF funds under 31 CFR 35.6; and Whereas, the City has set -aside $30,000 in FY23 funds from the City's Affordable Housing Fund to capitalize a landlord risk mitigation fund and anticipates FY24 and FY25 funds for same purpose; and Whereas, Shelter House has proposed to the City a Housing Stability Pilot, in which it will provide Coordinated Entry, Housing Stabilization Services, and Eviction Prevention and Diversion for a period of three years; and Whereas, providing eviction prevention and housing stability services as set forth in the attached Subrecipient Grant Agreement is a public purpose; and Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The Mayor is authorized to execute the attached Subrecipient Grant Agreement. 2. The City Manager is authorized to sign amendments to increase the budget for each activity by up to ten percent (10%) and to sign other amendments to the Subrecipient Grant Agreement as needed. Passed and approved this 10th day of January 2023. Resolution No. 23-16 Page 2 Attest: Approved b City Attorney' . Oice (Sue Dulek - 01/05/2023) Resolution No. 23-L6 Page 3 It was moved by Dunn and seconded by Al ter The Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent X Alter X Bergus X Dunn X Harmsen X Taylor X Teague X Thomas SUBRECIPIENT GRANT AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between the City of Iowa City, a municipal corporation ("City") and Shelter House ("Subrecipient") on January 10 , 2023 in Iowa City, Iowa. Whereas, the Housing Stability Pilot ("Pilot"), a program of Subrecipient, seeks to ensure a more efficient and effective homeless response system while preventing homelessness through eviction prevention and diversion and improving housing retention through increased partnerships; and Whereas, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on housing stability; and Whereas, the U.S. Department of Treasury allocated the City funds through the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund ("SLFRF") as part of the American Rescue Plan Act (aka, ARPA) to meet local needs; and Whereas, federal regulations permit the City to make subawards with SLFRF funds for the purpose of carrying out an eligible use under the SLFRF program; and Whereas, Subrecipient has proposed to the City a Housing Stability Pilot, in which Subrecipient will provide Coordinated Entry, Housing Stabilization Services, and Eviction Prevention and Diversion for a period of three years; and Whereas, households experiencing housing insecurity are presumed eligible and emergency housing assistance services are an enumerated use of SLFRF funds under 31 CFR 35.6. Now, therefore, the City and Subrecipient agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Term. This Agreement shall commence upon execution and remain in effect until December 31, 2026, unless terminated as provided herein. 2. SLFRF Funds. The City shall provide Subrecipient a total sum not to exceed $1,137,710 in SLFRF funds for Activities #1, 2 and 3, except for the capitalization funds for the risk mitigation fund estimated at $30,000 annually during the term of this Agreement, payable as provided herein. 3. Use of Funds. Subrecipient shall use the funds for the following three activities: Description of Activities: Activity # 1: Coordinated Entry Subrecipient shall use funds for salary and benefits of one (1) full-time equivalent (FTE) Coordinated Entry Specialist, related equipment and IT costs of this position, associated supplies, and a translation subscription service. The scope of Coordinated Entry shall include the following services for the duration of this agreement: • Answering phone calls and meeting with people in person to complete assessments to determine household need; and • Organizing and holding biweekly meetings with community -based housing providers to prioritize households and assign to the appropriate housing intervention and making referrals to the applicable organization(s). 1 This activity shall be limited to clients served within Johnson and Washington Counties. This activity shall begin immediately. Activity #2: Housing Stabilization Services Subrecipient shall use funds for salary and benefits of two (2) full-time equivalent (FTE) Housing Stability Specialists to provide housing stabilization, related equipment and IT costs of these positions, associated materials and supplies, and transportation costs for these positions. The Subrecipient shall provide the following services for the duration of this agreement: • Housing Navigation: Expansion of housing search and location services, arranging apartment viewings, ongoing outreach and relationship building with local landlords and property managers, and support through the lease -up process to support households for whom eviction is imminent (HUD Category 2 of Homelessness). • RentWise: Restart the tenant education series RentWise to increase prospective renters' success in all aspects of the rental experience. Offer eight courses annually throughout the duration of this Agreement. The program shall not be mandatory, but Subrecipient shall encourage all prospective renters to participate. The prior two activities shall be limited to clients served within Johnson and Washington Counties. • Landlord Risk Mitigation: Establish and administer a landlord risk mitigation fund to incentivize private landlords to rent to households with limited income, poor rental or credit histories, and/or a criminal background. Funds may cover excessive damages to a rental unit, lost rent, or legal fees beyond those covered by a security deposit. Claims of damages must be verified. If there are damages or losses to a unit owned by Subrecipient or the Subrecipient is the claimant, the City's Senior Housing Inspector or designee must verify the damages before funds are allocated from this fund. Claims for damages or losses must be documented. Photos of units shall be taken at lease up or documented through the HQS process to verify if damage occurred while the tenant occupied the residence. Maximum eligible amount per unit shall be $3,500. The Neighborhood Services Coordinator may approve a request for an increased amount based on extenuating circumstances. In FY23, there is $30,000 available for the risk mitigation fund. Upon execution of this Agreement, FY23 funds may be requested by the Subrecipient. Subrecipient shall hold these funds in an interest -bearing account at a local bank or credit union and drawn as needed for approved claims. Any accrued interest shall be reinvested into the risk mitigation fund. Subrecipient may make funding requests for FY24 and FY25 after July 1 of each fiscal year up to the amount approved by City Council in the City's annual budget, estimated at $30,000 annually. Eligibility for risk mitigation funds will be limited to landlords renting to households engaged in a local Rapid Rehousing program, households supported by Mainstream Vouchers or Emergency Housing Vouchers, Permanent Supportive Housing providers, 2 and other not -for -profits offering supported housing to extremely low-income (0-30% of the Area Median Income) households. Eligibility requires an initial 12-month lease and units must be located within the City of Iowa City's corporate limits. The program shall be assessed annually to determine ongoing eligibility criteria with potential expansion to landlords serving any Housing Choice Voucher household and landlords renting to households at or below 60% of the Area Median Income at or below the current HOME Fair Market Rent for Iowa City. If eligibility is expanded, Subrecipient shall provide written notification to the City within 30 days of the effective date that defines the new eligibility criteria, and this Agreement will be amended accordingly. This activity shall begin by February 1, 2023. Activity #3: Eviction Prevention and Diversion Subrecipient shall use funds for salary and benefits of two (2) full-time equivalent (FTE) Eviction Prevention and Housing Stabilization Specialists, related equipment and IT costs of these positions, associated printing and supplies, and transportation costs for these positions. Services provided shall include: • Financial assistance (rent and utility arrears) with onsite application that integrates with existing Coordinated Entry efforts to avoid duplication of efforts. • Landlord -Tenant education, relationship building and conflict management. • Needs assessments, service navigation, application for mainstream benefits including but not limited to SNAP, Johnson County General Assistance, the Housing Choice Voucher Program, and SSI/SSDI. • Increased outreach and education to landlords on eviction prevention. • Utilization of Rapid Rehousing funds as needed to relocate households where possible after all other avenues have been exhausted. Subrecipient shall continue to work in collaboration with Iowa Legal Aid for the maintenance of the on -site Legal Aid Clinic at the Johnson County Courthouse originated during the pandemic response. Attorneys will work with households referred by Shelter House that require legal intervention and support. Assistance will include, but not be limited to, credit repair, garnishments, child support, paternity disestablishment where appropriate, taxes, and habitability adjudication Subrecipient shall subcontract with Iowa Legal Aid for Expungement Clinics to reduce and remove criminal records that disproportionately affect people of color and pose barriers to housing, employment, and licensure. A copy of the subcontract with Iowa Legal Aid shall be provided to the City upon execution. This activity shall be limited to clients served within Johnson and Washington Counties. This activity shall begin by February 1, 2023. 4. Payment. Subrecipient shall make quarterly requests for reimbursement within thirty (30) days of the completion of the quarter. The City shall provide payment within 30 days of receipt of an approved reimbursement claim for Housing Stability Pilot program expenditures, not to exceed a total maximum reimbursement of 3 $1,137,710. All SLFRF funds must be expended no later than December 31, 2026. The budget for the reimbursable expenditures is as follows: Budgeted Items Activity #1 Coordinated Entry Coordinated Entry Specialist (1 FTE) including salary and benefits, equipment and IT, supplies and subscription to translation service. Activity #2 Housing Stabilization Services Housing Stability Specialists (2 FTEs) including salary and benefits, equipment and IT, materials and supplies, and transportation costs. Activity #3 Eviction Prevention and Diversion Eviction Prevention Supportive Services (2 FTEs) including salary and benefits, equipment and IT, printing and supplies, transportation. Iowa Legal Aid Expungement Clinic Administration and Reporting Total for Fiscal Year FY2023 $33,312 FY2024 I FY2025 FY2026 1 Total $67,350 $64,450 $70,195 $130,410 $63,950 $15,000 $9,9300 $33,313 $135,430 $129,410 $30,000 $18,805 $204,350 $64,450 $134,430 $30,000 $19,475 $186,012 $376,155 $389,530 $394,740 $63,950 $15,000 $9,300 $391,740 $90,000 $56,800 $186,013 $1,137,710 The Neighborhood Services Coordinator may administratively approve budget revisions within 10% of the outlined budget items in terms of category and/or fiscal year. 5. Procurement. Subrecipient shall procure all materials, property, or services in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.317-326. 6. Quarterly Reporting. Subrecipient shall provide quarterly reports at of the end of each fiscal quarter on the ARPA-SLFRF Quarterly Report Form, which is attached tednths Exhibit dlayfollowing and therated end ofherein. each fiscal quuch arter shall be delivered to the City not later than January 10, April 10, July 10 and October 10) and shall contain: a. The status of completion of the overall award, including all Activities; b. A narrative update of any progress made on each Activity during the quarter; c. The amount spent on each Activity during the quarter; d. A certification that, as of such �e Gralng nt A aeement) Subrec p ent sthe and has been pr°fulllg date (or if none, since the date oft 9 compliance with all terms of the Agreement; and e. Invoice and documentation of expenses for which the Subrecipient is requesting reimbursement; f. A separate report for the Risk Mitigation fund that identifies and summarizes claims paid, shall also include addresses of units assisted and type of claim paid; and g. Such other items as the City shall reasonably request related to the Agreement. 7. Duplication of Benefits. 4 By entering this agreement, the Subrecipient agrees to the following: a. The Subrecipient shall disclose all sources of actual and potential financial assistance. b. The Subrecipient agrees that the total financial assistance applied for does not exceed the total need. c. After entering into this Agreement, the Subrecipient must notify the City of any additional financial assistance it receives for the activities listed herein. d. Any unreported financial assistance will be considered a failure to comply with this Agreement. Duplication of benefits will result in the Subrecipient repaying ARPA and/or local funds to the City. 8. Close Out Reporting. The close out of this Agreement is governed by 2 CFR 200.343-.344. Subrecipient's obligation to the City shall not end until all close-out requirements are completed, and the compliance period is over. 9. City and U.S. Treasury Recognition. Subrecipient shall insure recognition of the role of the City and the U.S. Treasury in providing funding through this Agreement. Additionally, any publication produced with the SLFRF funds must display the following language: This project is supported, in whole or in part, by federal awarded number SLFRP0047 awarded to the City of Iowa City by the U.S. Department of Treasury. 10. Termination. For Cause In accordance with 2 CFR 200.338-342, the City may terminate this Agreement if the Subrecipient materially fails to comply with any terms of this Agreement, which include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Failure to comply with any of the rules, regulations or provisions referred to herein, or such statutes, regulations, executive orders, and U.S. Treasury guidelines, policies or directives as may become applicable at any time; 2. Failure, for any reason, of the Subrecipient to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement; 3. Ineffective or improper use of funds provided under this Agreement; or 4. Submission by the Subrecipient to the City reports that are incorrect or incomplete in any material respect. Prior to a suspension or termination for the reasons in this paragraph (#4) the Subrecipient shall have fifteen (15) days following written notice from the City, to cure. The City shall be obligated to make no payment due hereunder if City has notified Subrecipient, in writing, of its intent to suspend or terminate this Agreement. In the event of termination, Subrecipient shall repay to the City the full amount of funds that have been disbursed to Subrecipient under the terms of this Agreement within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from City of its intent to terminate this Agreement. The failure of City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants or conditions of the Agreement, or to exercise any options herein conferred in any one or more instances shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment for the future of any such covenant, condition, or option, but the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. For Convenience 5 This Agreement may be terminated upon the mutual agreement of the parties hereto, in which case the City and the Subrecipient shall agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and the disposition of contract amounts. 11. SAM. Subrecipient shall maintain an active SAM registration at all times while this Agreement is in effect. 12. Documentation and Record Keeping. Records to be Maintained Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations, which are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to: a. Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; b. Financial records as required by 2 CFR 200.333-337; and c. Other records necessary to document compliance 2 CFR 200. Retention Subrecipient shall comply with the record retention requirements set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Part D. Additionally, the Subrecipient shall retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to the Agreement until January 31, 2030 ("retention period"). Such records include but are not limited to payroll, timekeeping records, invoices, receipts, purchase orders, bank statements, and cancelled checks. Notwithstanding the above, if there is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration of the retention period, then such records must be retained until completion of the actions and resolution of all issues. 13. Audits & Inspections. Throughout the retention period, all Subrecipient records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the City, and the Comptroller General of the United States or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the Subrecipient within 30 days after receipt by the Subrecipient. Failure of the Subrecipient to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The Subrecipient hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F for the funded years 2022, 2023, and 2024 and to provide the City with a copy within thirty (30) days of receipt. 14. Use and Reversion of Assets. Subrecipient's use and disposition of real property and equipment under this Agreement shall comply with the requirements set forth in 2 CFR 200.311-313. 15. Notices. All notices required to be given hereunder shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, sent certified or registered, addressed as follows: 6 a. If to Subrecipient, to: Executive Director Shelter House P.O. Box 3146 Iowa City, IA 52244-3146 b. If to the City, to: City Attorney City of Iowa City 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 or to such other address or person as hereafter designated in writing by the applicable party in the manner provided in this paragraph for the giving of notices 16. Non Discrimination. Subrecipient shall not permit any of the following terms and practices: A. To discharge from employment or refuse to hire any individual or to discriminate against any individual in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of their race, creed, color, national origin, religion, age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, or handicap status. B. Subrecipient shall not deny to any person its services on the basis of race, creed, color, national original, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, or handicap status 17. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Subrecipient, its contractors, subcontractors, successors, transferees, and assignees, shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from excluding from a program or activity, denying benefits of, or otherwise discriminating against a person on the basis of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract (or agreement). Title VI also includes protection to persons with "Limited English Proficiency" in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., as implemented by the Department of the Treasury's Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, and herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement. 18. Third Party Beneficiary/Independent Contractor. The City's sole responsibility hereunder shall be to provide the funds to Subrecipient in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement, nor any act or omission of the Subrecipient or the City, shall be construed to create any special duty, relationship, third -party beneficiary, respondent superior, limited or general partnership, joint venture, or any association by reason of the Subrecipient's involvement with the City, nor shall the City have authority to direct the manner or means by which Subrecipient conducts activities. 19. Conflict of Interest. Iowa Law Upon signing this Agreement, Subrecipient acknowledges that Section 362.5 of the Iowa Code prohibits a City officer or employee from having an interest in a contract with the City and certifies that no employee or 7 officer of the City, which includes members of the City Council and City boards and commissions, has an interest, either direct or indirect, in this Agreement, that does not fall within the exceptions to said statutory provision enumerated in Section 362.5. SLFRF Requirement Subrecipient shall maintain a conflict -of -interest policy consistent with 2 CFR 200.318(c) which is applicable to each activity funded with an SLFRF award. Subrecipient shall disclose to the City and to the U.S. Treasury any potential conflict of interest affecting the awarded funds in accordance with 2 CFR 200.112. 20. Indemnification. Each party agrees to release, indemnify and hold the other parties, their officers and employees harmless from and against any and all liabilities, damages, business interruptions, delays, losses, claims, judgments, of any kind whatsoever, including all costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses incidental thereto, which may be suffered by, or charged to, the party by reason of any loss or damage to any property or injury to or death of any person arising out of or by reason of any breach, violation or non-performance by the other parties or their servants, employees or agents of any covenant or condition of this Agreement or by any act or failure to act of those persons. The City shall not be liable for its failure to perform this Agreement or for any loss, injury, damage or delay of any nature whatsoever resulting therefrom caused by any act of God, fire, flood, accident, strike, labor dispute, riot, insurrection, war or any other cause beyond the City's control. 21. Conflict of LawsNenue/Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Iowa. Any legal proceeding instituted with respect to this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in Johnson County, Iowa. The parties hereto hereby submit to personal jurisdiction therein and irrevocably waive any objection as to venue therein, including any argument that such proceeding has been brought in an inconvenient forum. 22. Amendment. All amendments shall be in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. 23. Severability. In the event any portion of this Agreement shall, for any reason, be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in whole or in part, the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby and shall continue to be valid and enforceable and if, for any reason, a court finds that any provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal, or unenforceable as written, but that by limiting such provision it would become valid, legal and enforceable then such provision shall be deemed to be written, construed and enforced as so limited. 24. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of both parties and their respective permitted successors, assigns and other legal representatives. Neither this Agreement nor the rights arising hereunder shall be assignable by either of the parties hereto to any third party without the prior written consent of the other party to this Agreement 25. Captions. 8 The captions of the sections of this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and in no way define, limit or affect the scope or substance of any section of this Agreement. 26. Entire Agreement/Integration. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the City and the Subrecipient for the use of funds received under this Agreement and it supersedes all prior or contemporaneous communications and proposals, whether electronic, oral, or written between the City and the Subrecipient with respect to this Agreement. 27. SLFRC Regulations. This Agreement is subject to the Final Rules issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury published on January 6, 2022 for the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund and the Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Fund established under the American Rescue Plan Act. Subrecipient acknowledges that the U.S. Department of Treasury may amend the SLFRC regulations during the term of this Agreement, and Subrecipient agrees to comply with any applicable amended regulation. 28. Labor Standards. Subrecipient agrees to comply with the requirements of the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis -Bacon Act as amended, the provisions of Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327 et seq.) and all other applicable Federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards insofar as those acts apply to the performance of this Agreement. Subrecipient agrees to comply with the Copeland Anti -Kick Back Act (18 U.S.C. 874 et seq.) and its implementing regulations of the U.S. Department of Labor at 29 CFR Part 5. The Subrecipient shall maintain documentation that demonstrates compliance with hour and wage requirements of this part. Such documentation shall be made available to the City for review upon request. 29. Compliance with Laws and Guidelines. Subrecipient certifies that this Agreement will be conducted and administered in compliance with the federal laws, regulations, and Executive Orders contained in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated herein. In addition to the specific laws set forth in this Agreement, Subrecipient shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. CIEY,OF IOWA CITY Qt&-stAsZ--- SHELTER HOUSE Executive Director Approved: City Attorney's Office (Sue Dulek — 01/05/2023) %0 -D----- 9 Reporting Period (select one): Exhibit A CITY OF IOWA CITY ARPA-SLFRF Quarterly Report Form ❑ Jan -Mar (Q1) ❑ Apr -June (Q2) ❑ July -Sept (Q3) ❑ Oct -Dec (Q4) Amount of Costs Incurred (cumulative, to -date): Amount Expended (cumulative, to -date): $ ;iitck or tap here to ei;t: r te:<t. $ Click or tap here to enter text. Program Income Earned (cumulative, to -date): $ ' ick or tap here to enter text. Program Income Expended (cumulative, to -date): $Click or tap here to enter text. Completion Status: Brief Description of Project Accomplishments for the Quarter: Subaward Specific Data: Signature Date 10 EXHIBIT B CERTIFICATIONS Subrecipient hereby certifies that the grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with: (1) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub. L. 88-352; 42 U.S.C. 2000d, et seq.) and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR Part 1; (2) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90-284; 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) as amended; and that the grantee will administer all programs and activities related to housing and community development in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing; (3) Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended; and the regulations issued pursuant thereto; (4) Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended; (5) Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Orders 11375 and 12086, and implementing regulations issued at 41 CFR Chapter 60; (6) Executive Order 11063, as amended by Executive Orders 12259, and implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 107; (7) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-112), as amended, and implementing regulations when published for effect; (8) The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1975 (Pub. L. 94-135), as amended, and implementing regulations when published for effect; (9) The relocation requirements of Title II and the acquisition requirements of Title III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and the HUD implementing regulations set forth in 24 CFR Part 42; (10) Executive Order 11988 relating to the evaluation of flood hazards and Executive Order 11288 relating to the prevention, control and abatement of water pollution; (11) The flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-234); (12) The applicable regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements of OMB Circular Nos. A-102, Revised, 24 CFR 85 and Subpart J of 24 CFR 570, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-128 and A-133 as they relate to the acceptance and use of federal funds under this federally -assisted program; 11 (13) The Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et.seq.) as amended; particularly section 176 (c) and (d) [42 U.S.C. 7506 (c) and (d)]; (14) The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 201,300 (f) et.seq., and 21 U.S.C. 349) as amended; particularly section 1424 (e) (42 U.S.C. 300 (h)- 303 (e)); (15) The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et. Seq.) as amended; including but not limited to section 7 (16 U.S.C. 1536) thereof; (16) The Reservoir Salvage Act of 1960 916 U.S.C. 469 et.seq.); particularly section 3 (16 U.S.C. 469a-1); as amended by the Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1974; (17) Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et.seq.) as amended; particularly sections 102(a) and 202(a) [42 U.S.C. 4012a(a) and 4106(a)]; (18) Executive order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26961 et. Seq.); particularly sections 2 and 5; (19) Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention requirements of 25 CFR Part 35 issued pursuant to the Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821 et.seq.); (20) The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.) as amended; particularly section 106 (16 U.S.C. 470f); and (21) Executive Order 11593, Protection and Enhancement of the Cultural Environment; May 13, 1971 (36 FR 8921 et seq.); particularly section 2(c). (22) Construction work financed in whole or in part with federal funds is subject to the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis -Bacon Act (29 CFR, Parts 3 and 5), the Copeland Act (29 CFR Part 3), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (Public Law 91-54, 83 Stat. 96). When a project meets this applicability requirement, the labor standards provision of the HUD 4010 and the Davis- Bacon Wage Decision issued for the project will be incorporated into this contract document and shall be incorporated into all construction contracts and subcontracts of any tier thereunder. (23) No ARPA funds may be expended for lobbying purposes and payments from other sources for lobbying must be disclosed (24 CFR Part 87). (a) No federally appropriated funds have been or will be paid, by or on behalf of subrecipient, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress. or an 12 employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (b) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (24) Where asbestos is present in property undergoing rehabilitation, Federal requirements apply regarding worker exposure, abatement procedures and disposal. (CPD-90-44 EPA/OSHA). (25) Compliance with Applicable Law and Regulations. (a) Subrecipient agrees to comply with the requirements of sections 602 and 603 of the Act, regulations adopted by Treasury pursuant to sections 602(f) and 603(f) of the Act, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing. Subrecipient also agrees to comply with all other applicable federal statutes, regulations, and executive orders, and Subrecipient shall provide for such compliance by other parties in any agreements it enters into with other parties relating to this award. (b) Federal regulations applicable to this award include, without limitation , the following: i. Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. Part 200, other than such provisions as Treasury may determine are inapplicable to this Award and subject to such exceptions as may be otherwise provided by Treasury. Subpart F - Audit Requirements of the Uniform Guidance; implementing the Single Audit Act, shall apply to this award. ii. Universal Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM), 2 C.F.R. Part 25, pursuant to which the award term set forth in Appendix A to 2 C.F.R. Part 25 is hereby incorporated by reference. iii. Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information, 2 C.F.R. Part 170, pursuant to which the award term set forth in Appendix A to 2 C.F.R. Part 170 is hereby incorporated by reference. 13 iv. OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governrnentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), 2 C.F.R. Part 180, including the requirement to include a term or condition in all lower tier covered transactions (contracts and subcontracts described in 2 C.F.R. Part 180, subpart B) that the award is subject to 2 C.F.R. Part 180 and Treasury's implementing regulation at 31 C.F.R. Part 19. v. Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters, pursuant to which the award term set forth in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII to Part 200 is hereby incorporated by reference. vi. Governmentwide Requirements for Drug -Free Workplace, 31 C.F.R. Part 20. vii. New Restrictions on Lobbying, 31 C.F.R. Part 21. viii. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655) and implementing regulations. ix. Generally applicable federal environmental laws and regulations. (c) Statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination applicable to this award, include, without limitation, the following: i. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d et seq.) and Treasury's implementing regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 22, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin under programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance; ii. The Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability; iii. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance; iv. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101 et seq.), and Treasury's implementing regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 23, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance; and v. Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.), which prohibits 14 discrimination on the basis of disability under programs, activities, and services provided or made available by state and local governments or instrumentalities or agencies thereto. (26) Hatch Act. Subrecipient agrees to comply, as applicable, with requirements of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328), which limit certain political activities of State or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by this federal assistance. (a) In accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 4712, Subecipient may not discharge, demote , or otherwise discriminate against an employee in reprisal for disclosing to any of the list of persons or entities provided below, information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a federal contract or grant, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a federal contract or grant, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law. rule, or regulation related to a federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or 9 rant. (b) The list of persons and entities referenced in the paragraph above includes the following: i. A member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress; ii. An Inspector General; iii. The Government Accountability Office; iv. A Treasury employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management; v. An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency; vi. A court or grand jury; or vii. A management official or other employee of Subrecipient, contractor, or subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct. (c) Subrecipient shall inform its employees in writing of the rights and remedies provided under this section, in the predominant native language of the workforce. (27) Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States. Pursuant to Executive Order 13043, 62 FR 19217 (Apr. 18, 1997), Subrecipient should encourage its contractors to adopt and enforce on- the-job seat belt policies and programs for their employees when operating company -owned rented or personally owned vehicles. 15 (28) Reducing Text Messaging While Driving. Pursuant to Executive Order 13513, 74 FR 51225 (Oct. 6, 2009), Subrecipient should encourage its employees, subrecipients, and contractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving, and Subrecipient should establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers. (29) Appendix II to 2 CFR Part 200. Subrecipient shall comply with the following: • • Equal Employment Opportunity. Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60, all contracts that meet the definition of "federally assisted construction contract" in 41 CFR Part 60-1.3 must include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 CFR 60-1.4(b), in accordance with Executive Order 11246, "Equal Employment Opportunity" (30 FR 12319, 12935, 3 CFR Part, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339), as amended by Executive Order 11375, "Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity," and implementing regulations at 41 CFR part 60, "Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor." All applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) - A subcontract must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR part 1986 Comp , p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR part 1989 Comp., p. 235), "Debarment and Suspension." SAM Exclusions contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Byrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352) - Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress; officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non -Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non -Federal award. 16 § 200.322. (a)As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non -Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. (b) For purposes of this section: (1) "Produced in the United States" means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. (2) "Manufactured products" means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer -based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber. 17 Item Number: 16. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Support Services Division of the Police Department and the Confidential, Administrative and Executive pay plan by adding one .5 FTE Civilian Accreditation Manager position, grade 24. Prepared By: Captain Denise Brotherton, Police Reviewed By: Chief Dustin Liston, Police. Fiscal Impact: The estimated financial impact of the .50 FTE Civilian Accreditation Manager is between $44,399 and $55,903 depending on the step the individual starts at (using FY23 salary table and insurance rates). Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: The commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (C.A.L.E.A.) manager is responsible for maintaining the mandated level for training for members of the department as well as ensuring all personnel are trained in areas that are necessary for the efficient functioning of the department. One .5 FTE Civilian Accreditation Manager (a position recommended in the December 2020 Restructuring of the Iowa City Police Department plan) will replace the current full time Accreditation Sergeant which will allow for the reallocation of a full-time supervisor position to Professional Standards. Background /Analysis: The purpose of the Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (C.A.L.E.A.) Accreditation Programs is to improve the delivery of public safety services, primary by maintaining a body of standards developed by public safety practitioners covering a wide range of up-to-date public safety initiatives, establishing, and administering an accreditation process, and recognizing professional excellence. The Iowa City Police Department received its first accreditation from the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (C.A.L.E.A.) in 2002 and has maintained accreditation since by successfully passing rigorous web -based reviews and site - based assessments. The Iowa City Police Department is one of ten Iowa law enforcement agencies accredited by C.A.L.E.A. and only 4% of all law enforcement agencies in the country have earned this distinction. Currently, accreditation efforts are managed by a sworn Sergeant within the Iowa City Police Department. C.A.L.E.A. does not require that the accreditation manager be a sworn officer. In the City Manager's Preliminary Plan to Accelerate Community Policing by Restructuring the Iowa City Police Department, recommendation #18 states "Iowa City should consider a civilian Accreditation Manager position that could bring a non -law enforcement perspective to police policy development and compliance review efforts." The police department supports this recommendation. The police department believes that the responsibilities of the accreditation manager could be managed by one .5 FTE civilian position that would allow for the reallocation of a full-time sworn supervisor to a Professional Standards position to standardize and streamline administrative investigations. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Dustin Liston, Police Chief, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5271 Resolution Number. 73-1 7 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Support Services Division of the Police Department and the Confidential, Administrative and Executive pay plan by adding one .5 FTE Civilian Accreditation Manager position, grade 24. Whereas, Resolution No. 22-76, adopted by the City Council on March 22, 2022 authorized budgeted positions in the Police Department for Fiscal Year 2023; and Whereas, Resolution No. 21-112, adopted by the City Council on May 4, 2021 established a classification and compensation plan for Confidential, Administrative and Executive employees; and Whereas, the commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (C.A.L.E.A.) manager is responsible for maintaining the mandated level of training for members of the department as well as ensuring all personnel are trained in areas that are necessary for the efficient functioning of the department; and Whereas, one .5 FTE Civilian Accreditation Manager (a position recommended in the December 2020 Restructuring of the Iowa City Police Department plan) will replace the current full time Accreditation Sergeant which will allow for the reallocation of a full-time supervisor position to Professional Standards. Now Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The budgeted positions in the Support Services Division of the Police Department be amended by adding one .5 FTE Civilian Accreditation Manager position, grade 24. 2. The Confidential, Administrative, and Executive pay plan be amended by adding the position of Civilian Accreditation Manager position to grade 24. Passed and approved this loth Attest: C y Clerk It was moved by Thomas and upon roll call there were: AYES: X X X X X day of January , 20 23 . Approved by • City Att. e s Office (Jennif r Schwickerath — 12/29/2022) and seconded by Dunn NAYS: ABSENT: the Resolution be adopted, Alter Bergus Harmsen Taylor Teague Thomas Dunn Item Number: 17. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Support Services Division of the Police Department by deleting one full-time Sergeant position, grade 29, and adding one full-time Lieutenant position, grade 30. Prepared By: Captain Denise Brotherton, Police Department Reviewed By: Chief Dustin Liston, Police Department Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The impact is projected to be between $6,302-$10,525 annually Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: Currently, internal affairs investigations and complaints are assigned to four separate Lieutenants to investigate. A full-time Lieutenant assigned to professional standards would allow a singular point person for all internal affairs investigations and complaints, which would create more continuity and consistency with police department investigations. Deleting a full-time Sergeant position and adding one full-time Lieutenant position would reduce the workload on watch supervisors and allow more time for field supervision. Background /Analysis: It is the policy of the Iowa City Police Department to investigate all complaints made against Department members and/or against Department policies and procedures, regardless of the source of such complaints. This policy includes the investigation of alleged or suspected violations of ordinances or Department rules, regulations, policies, procedures or orders (written or oral) as reported to Department managers and supervisors by members of the Department, community members, the Community Police Review Board, and supervisors and personnel who observe or suspect violations by Department personnel. Currently, the majority of these complaints are investigated by four separate Lieutenants assigned to patrol/investigations watches. Adding a full-time Lieutenant assigned to professional standards would create more continuity and consistency with these investigations and allow the watch supervisors more time for field supervision. The Lieutenant of Professional Standards is responsible for receiving, processing, and supervising internal affairs investigations that involve allegations of criminal conduct and acts of misconduct made against members of the Iowa City Police Department. The Lieutenant assigned to professional standards will ensure that allegations made against members of the ICPD are thoroughly and objectively investigated. This Lieutenant would handle responsibilities of the previous planning and research sergeant that include Use of Force review and data distribution and analysis. The Lieutenant would be responsible for the supervision of the Civilian Records Supervisor, Evidence Division, and Training & Accreditation. This Lieutenant would provide support to Command and report directly to the Chief of Police. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Prepared by: Dustin Liston, Police Chief, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5271 Resolution Number. 23-18 Resolution amending the budgeted positions in the Support Services Division of the Police Department by deleting one full-time Sergeant position, grade 29, and adding one full-time Lieutenant position, grade 30. Whereas, Resolution No. 22-76, adopted by the City Council on March 22, 2022 authorized budgeted positions in the Police Department for Fiscal Year 2023; and Whereas, currently internal affairs investigations and complaints are assigned to four separate lieutenants to investigate, and Whereas, a full-time Lieutenant assigned to professional standards would allow a singular point person for all internal affairs investigations and complaints, which would create more continuity and consistency with police department investigations; and Whereas, deleting one full-time Sergeant position and adding one full-time Lieutenant position would reduce the workload on watch supervisors to allow more time for field supervision. Now Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that the budgeted positions in the Support Services Division of the Police Department be amended by: 1. Deleting one full-time Sergeant, grade 29. 2. Adding one full-time Lieutenant, grade 30. Passed and approved this loth It was moved by Di n day of January May , 2023 . Iextst— Approved by • City Attor ey's Office (Jennifer Schwickerath — 01/04/2023) and seconded by Alter adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: the Resolution be x Alter x Bergus x Harmsen x x X Taylor Teague Thomas Dunn Item Number: 18. 4CITY OF IOWA CITY !iklii:�� COUNCIL ACTION REPORT January 10, 2023 Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign an Agreement with CommUnity Crisis Services for Law Enforcement Liaison Support. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Captain Denise Brotherton, Police Department Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: $70,000 annually is budgeted to support the mental health liaison partnership with CommUnity Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Agreement Executive Summary: On February 2, 2021 CommUnity Crisis Services and Foundation 2 entered into an agreement with the City to employ, train, supervise, and support one mental health liaison to work with the Iowa City Police Department (ICPD) to serve and enhance the overall quality of care and safety for members of the community. Consistent with the City Council's Strategic Plan, the ICPD desires to partner with Comm Unity for a second full-time Law Enforcement Liaison as part of the ongoing commitment to improve outcomes on mental health related calls for service and divert persons who need support and treatment from emergency rooms and jails. Foundation 2's role was primarily to assist in starting the liaison program in 2021 and does not desire to partner in a new agreement for a second liaison. CommUnity is willing to employ a second Law Enforcement Liaison to work with the ICPD and has staff with the necessary qualifications, expertise, and experience for crisis intervention, referral, and support. Background /Analysis: The ICPD's Mental Health Law Enforcement Liaison performs a variety of functions in support of the police department's mission to work in partnership with the community, enhance trust, protect with courage and compassion, and empower victims of crime through excellence in service. The Mental Health Law Enforcement Liaison's specific role is to assist in the field with those individuals who are experiencing a mental health crisis, ultimately working to restore the individual to pre -crisis levels. In addition, a large part of the Mental Health Law Enforcement Liaison's role is to provide follow-up services and to triage individuals to a higher level of care within the mental health system. The Mental Health Law Enforcement Liaison has been invaluable to patrol in providing assistance on calls for service involving those in mental crisis and providing the in-depth follow up that patrol officers are not able to perform due to the need to respond to other needs in the community. The partnership with CommUnity to provide a liaison with the necessary qualifications, expertise, and experience with crisis intervention, referral, and support has been successful and the I CPD wishes to continue this partnership. The I CPD desires to add a second full-time Mental Health Law Enforcement Liaison to increase responses on mental health related calls for service and to continue to divert persons who need support and treatment from emergency rooms and jails. The addition of a second Mental Health Law Enforcement Liaison will double the ICPD's capacity of co -response to mental health crisis calls as recommended in the Preliminary Plan to Accelerate Community Policing in the Iowa City Police Department. Entering into the agreement to employ, train, and supervise two liaisons to work with the ICPD will enhance the overall quality of care and safety of the Iowa City Community. The proposed agreement is substantially similar to the existing agreement including the funding for the liaison positions, which is 75% from the City and 25% from the State's regional funding for mental health services. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Agreement Prepared by: Susan Dulek, First Ass't. City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030 Resolution No. 23-19 Resolution approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign an Agreement with CommUnity Crisis Services for Law Enforcement Liaison Support. Where, on February 2, 2021 CommUnity Crisis Services (CommUnity) and Foundation 2 entered into an agreement with the City (approved in Resolution No. 21-25) to employ, train, supervise and support one mental health liaison to work with the Iowa City Police Department (ICPD) to serve and enhance the overall quality of care and safety for members of the community; and Whereas, the ICPD desires to add a second full-time Law Enforcement Liaison as part of the commitment to improve outcomes on mental health related calls for service and divert persons who need support and treatment from emergency rooms and jails; and Whereas, CommUnity is willing to employ a second Law Enforcement Liaison to work with the ICPD and has staff with the necessary qualifications, expertise, and experience for crisis intervention, referral, and support; and Whereas, Foundation 2's role was primarily to assist in starting the liaison program in 2021 and does not desire to partner in a new agreement for a second liaison; and Whereas, entering into the attached Agreement for Law Enforcement Liaison Support with CommUnity to employ, train, supervise and support two liaisons to work with the ICPD is an appropriate way to serve and enhance the overall quality of care and safety of the Iowa City community; and Whereas, funds used for the law enforcement liaisons under said agreement are a public purpose. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The attached Agreement for Law Enforcement Liaison Support is hereby approved. 2. The Mayor is authorized and directed to sign said agreement, and the City Manager is authorized to sign amendments thereto. Attest: I.�,��{�" City'Clerk Approved by. City Attorney'ffice (Sue Dulek — 01/04/2023) Resolution No. Page 2 It was moved by Dunn The Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: and seconded by TayTor Ayes: Nays: Absent X Alter X Bergus X Dunn X Harmsen X Taylor X Teague Thomas Agreement for Law Enforcement Liaison Support between Iowa City Police Department and CommUnity This agreement for law enforcement liaison crisis support and follow up effective February 1, 2023, is by and between the City of Iowa City (Police Department or ICPD) and CommUnity Crisis Services (CommUnity) ), a crisis mental health provider accredited by the American Association of Suicidology and Iowa Administrative Code 441- 24. Summary: ICPD and CommUnity formed a partnership through understanding the importance of best meeting the needs of people in the community living with mental health challenges. Through partnership, the program works to improve services provided to the public. The effort will focus on providing increased access to mental health resources, diversion from hospitalization and jail, and other treatment services for individuals with mental illness or co-occurring mental health and substance abuse disorders. RECITALS A. ICPD, through partnership with an accredited community organization desires to contract for two full-time Law Enforcement Liaisons as part of its commitment to improve outcomes on mental health related calls for service and divert persons who need support and treatment from emergency rooms and jails. B. ICPD applied and was selected by the East Central Region MHDS to collaborate with CommUnity whose staff have the necessary qualifications, expertise, and experience for crisis intervention, referral, and support. C. ICPD has determined that entering into the Agreement with CommUnity to employ, train, supervise, and support liaisons to work with the ICPD is an appropriate way to serve and enhance the overall quality and safety of care for their constituents in their community. D. ICPD and CommUnity along with Foundation 2 entered into a substantially similar agreement on February 2, 2021 for one mental health liaison, and Foundation 2 consents to termination of said agreement. As provided herein, ICPD and CommUnity agree to termination of said agreement. In consideration of the foregoing recitals and mutual promises and covenants contained herein, ICPD and CommUnity agree as follows: I. ICPD Responsibilities a. ICPD fully supports the integration of the contracted two full-time Law Enforcement Liaison positions and at all levels of leadership will take strong initiative to help ensure success of this program. b. ICPD will identify a position of Sergeant or above to provide oversight and support to the Law Enforcement Liaison positions, accountability to other officers, and frequent connection to CommUnity administration. c. ICPD agrees to provide CommUnity with the support necessary to effectively integrate the Law Enforcement Liaisons into the department including space to work, tools for communication, access to relevant information, and engagement with staff at all levels. d. The Law Enforcement Liaisons will be hired and employed by CommUnity but ICPD will actively participate in the hiring and selection process. A background check must be conducted or approved by the ICPD prior to start of employment. The ICPD will pay upon invoice from CommUnity 75% of salary of each position. CommUnity Responsibilities CommUnity will employ two full-time trained counselors as Law Enforcement Liaisons to the ICPD to improve the level of service provided to the community. While the ICPD will be involved in overseeing certain aspects of day to day activities of the liaisons and may provide input to CommUnity in making employment decisions, CommUnity shall be responsible for all employer functions including hiring, background checks, wages, benefits, supervision and discipline and final decisions relating thereto. The job description for the Law Enforcement Liaison position is attached as "Exhibit A". CommUnity will be responsible for collaborating with the ICPD to effectively fulfill the program delivery items below in a manner satisfactory to the ICPD. Such program will include the following activities: Law Enforcement Liaisons, CommUnity administration, and the ICPD will participate in monthly meetings to explore improved responses to and increasing diversion from the criminal justice system for individuals who have a mental illness. 2. CommUnity maintains profession) full-time individuals for the position of Law Enforcement Liaison. 3. Collect agreed upon data and provide to ICPD and City of Iowa City requested. 4. Provide support, guidance and training to the ICPD as a whole in an effort to improve awareness and drive mental health initiatives and best practices. a. b. c. d. e. f. g• 1. mutually agreed qualified (in the mental health as CommUnity will provide two full-time crisis counselors for the provision of crisis intervention services in the position of Law Enforcement Liaison. CommUnity will provide case management and referral services to the clients served by the above mentioned position. The identified CommUnity Law Enforcement Liaisons will attend (in person, by phone, zoom, or other platform) planning meetings. CommUnity will collect and disseminate program related data, as well as prepare and present data as requested. An annual report shall be prepared and delivered to the ICPD a on a calendar basis no later than January 31 of each year. CommUnity will maintain professional liability and general liability insurance, which includes the City as a named insured and present documentation of insurance coverage as requested. III. Service Delivery a. The CommUnity Law Enforcement Liaisons will work full-time hours as determined by ICPD and CommUnity and directed by CommUnity that best serve the needs of the community. CommUnity acknowledges ICPD desires the liaisons be assigned to different hours/shifts with some flexibility to serve the needs of the community. b. CommUnity mobile crisis teams and crisis phone/chat/text teams will provide additional support through crisis counseling, suicide assessment and referral or linkage to services. c. ICPD and CommUnity will work together during the first two months of this Agreement to establish agreed upon standard operating procedures on when the Law Enforcement Liaisons will deploy with officers, when calls could be diverted to the Law Enforcement Liaisons directly and what resources will be utilized for crisis intervention calls occurring outside the normal working hours of the Law Enforcement Liaisons assigned to the ICPD. IV. Hold Harmless and Indemnification a. CommUnity shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify ICPD against any and all claims, liability, damages, including attorney fees, or judgments asserted against, imposed or incurred by ICPD that arise out of acts or omission of CommUnity agents or representatives, including the Law Enforcement Liaisons, in the discharge of its responsibilities under this Agreement. b. CommUnity shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify ICPD against any and all claims, liability, damages, including attorney fees, or judgments asserted against the ICPD in connection with the employment of the Law Enforcement Liaisons, whether such claims be brought by the Law Enforcement Liaisons or third parties. c. ICPD shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify CommUnity against any and all claims, liability, damages or judgments asserted against, imposed or incurred by CommUnity that arise out of acts or omissions of ICPD agents or representatives in the discharge of its responsibilities under this Agreement. Such indemnification shall not extend to actions or omissions of the Law Enforcement Liaisons or to claims brought by the Law Enforcement Liaisons. V. Term and Termination The term of this Agreement is 2/1/2023 to 1/31/2026. The Agreement will be automatically extended for additional one-year terms unless otherwise terminated as set forth herein. VI. Termination This Agreement may be terminated as follows: With or Without showing Cause. With or without showing cause and without penalty by either party at any time upon prior thirty (30) days written notice of termination to the other. VII. Miscellaneous The following additional conditions apply to this Agreement: a. Severability. In the event that one or more of the provisions contained in the Agreement are declared invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be impaired thereby, unless the effect of such invalidity is to substantially impair or undermine either party's rights and benefits hereunder. b. Anti -Discrimination. CommUnity shall not discriminate against any person in employment or public accommodation because of race, religion, color, creed, gender identity, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, marital status or age. "Employment" shall include but not be limited to hiring, accepting, registering, classifying, promoting, or referring to employment. "Public accommodation" shall include but not be limited to providing goods, services, facilities, privileges and advantages to the public. c. Independent Contractor. CommUnity shall at all times remain an independent contractor with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement, and nothing contained in this Agreement is intended to, or shall be construed as, creating or establishing the relationship of employer/employee between the parties. CommUnity shall be the employer of the Law Enforcement Liaisons and shall be responsible for all employer functions including hiring, wages, benefits, supervision and discipline and final decisions relating thereto. ICPD shall be exempt from payment of all Unemployment Compensation, FICA, retirement, life and/or medical insurance and Workers' Compensation Insurance, as CommUnity is an independent contractor. d. Modifications and amendments can be made to this agreement as long as both parties agree. All changes will be approved in writing and considered part of the agreement. e. ICPD and CommUnity agree that the agreement entitled "Law Enforcement Liaison Support Iowa City Police Department, CommUnity and Foundation 2, Inc." entered into on February 1, 2021 is terminated effective February 1, 2023. M �Y9Y City of Iowa City and Sarah NelsoxecGtive Director CommUnity Crisis Services Approved: City Attorney's Office I /d Date h /2.023 Date t Community Crisis Services and Food Bonk CommUnity Crisis Services and Food Bank 1121 S. Gilbert Ct., Iowa City, IA 52240-4528 builtbycommunity.org Mental Health/Law Enforcement Liaison EXHIB IT Job Description This position, through partnership with lowa City Police Department, will improve outcomes on mental health related calls for service and divert persons who need support and treatment from the emergency room and jail. Under the supervision of the Mobile Crisis Coordinator, the Mental Health Law Enforcement Liaison will work with assigned police officers to provide crisis intervention, referral and support to individuals in our community. Examples of Duties: • Work collaboratively with both Iowa City Police Department, as well as the CommUnity Mobile Crisis Team to ensure effective service delivery to clients. • Provide on -site crisis intervention services (intervention, referral, follow-up) to individuals in a mental health or behavioral health crisis at the request of the Iowa City Police Department. • Act as a liaison between the Iowa City Police Department and CommUnity in regards to crisis services delivery, data collection and coordination of care. • Assist individuals with scheduling appointments and/or assessments or re -connecting with prior service providers. The Mental Health Liaison will make the initial contact with clients during a crisis intervention, and provide follow-up services after the initial contact to ensure effective coordination of care. • Complete required paperwork and maintain client files in accordance with program rules and policies. • Go out on crisis calls with MCO Counselors when needed. • Remain in contact with the individual and the treatment providers by phone and/or in person to monitor participation in recommended services. Collaborate with other service providers involved with the individual, to assist in coordinating care. • Operate agency vehicles to transport clients as needed. • Other duties as assigned. Professional Qualifications: • Bachelor's degree in the human service field with a minimum of 2 years relevant experience or must have equivalent work experience. • Must pass criminal records/child abuse checks completed by CommUnity and Iowa City Police Department • Valid Iowa driver's license and insurable under agency liability insurance • Attend and complete ASIST and Community MCO training within 90 days of hire. • Ability to work a flexible schedule. Hours vary based on program needs but generally Monday through Friday during the day. Signature: Date: Business Line: 319-351-2726 • Crisis Line: 1-855-325-4286 • Food Bank: 319-351-0128