HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-05-05 Ordinance Prepared by: Shelley McCafferty, PCD, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5243 (REZ02-00022)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AN EXISTING PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT HOUSING
PLAN (OPDH-8) TO ALLOW A 64-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR LOT 255 OF WINDSOR
RIDGE PART 'FVVELVE LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF COURT STREET AND ARLINGTON
DRIVE.
WHEREAS, the applicant, Arlington L.C., is owner and legal title holder of approximately 7.93 acres of property
located at the southwest comer of the intersection of Court Street and Arlington Drive; and
WHEREAS, the subject properly was rezoned from Low Density Single Family Residential (RS-5) to Medium
Density Single Family Residential (RS-8) in 1995 subject to a conditional zoning agreement requiring a future
OPDH rezoning and approval of a development plan for the property; and
WHEREAS, an OPDH-8 plan was approved in 1999 for the construction of four 18-plex buildings with
underground parking; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that the proposed amended Preliminary
OPDH Plan is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and technical compliance with all applicable provisions of
the City Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a variation to allow multiple principle multi-family
buildings on a single lot; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a variation to reduce the distance between two
principle buildings on a single lot from a distance equal to the height of the highest building to 17 feet provides for
more .efficient land use; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a variation to allow three apartment buildings on a
lot in a Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS-8) zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. APPROVAL.: The amended Preliminary OPDH-8 Plan for Lot 255 of Windsor Ridge Part 12 is
hereby approved.
SECTION II. VARIATIONS. Section 14-6J-2-D-7 of the City Code provides that combinations of land uses are
permitted and variations in building setback and lot area requirements may be approved for planned developments,
and Section14-6J-2-B of the City Code provides for flexibility in architectural design, placement and clustering of
buildings, use of open space, traffic circulation and parking, and related site and design considerations. The following
waivers are approved as part of the Preliminary OPDH Plan:
a. Waiver of the general previsions to allow multiple principal buildings on a single lot in an RS zone.
b. Waiver of the underlying RS-8 zoning to allow three 12-unit apartment buildings.
c. Reduction of the required distance between two principle buildings from a distance equal to the height of
the highest building to 17 feet.
SECTION III. ZONING MAP. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of
the City of Iowa City, Iowa to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this
ordinance as provided by law.
SECTION IV. CERTIFICATION AND RECORDING The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a
copy of this ordinance and a copy of the amended Preliminary OPDH Plan for this property, and record the same in
the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval
and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law.
SECTION V. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinancas in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance
are hereby repealed.
SECTION VI. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid
or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision
or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION VII. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and
publication, as provided by law.
Passed and approved this __ day of ,20___
Ordinance No.
Page 2
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
City Al(/o}n~y's Offic~ ppdadm/ord?341 fiversideOSA-RNC20.doc
Ordinance No.
Page
It was moved by and seconded by that the Ordinance
as read be adopted, and upon tell call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
Champion
Kanner
Lehman
O'Donnell
Pfab
Vanderhoef
Wilbum
First Consideration 4/22/03
Voteforpassage: AYES: Kanne~', Lehman, O'Donne'll, Vanden'hoer, t~ilbut-n, Champion.
NAYS: Pfab. ABSENT: None.
Second Consideration 5/5/03
Vote for passage: AYES : Pfab, Wndet-hoef, ~li]but'n, Champion, Kanne~', Lehman,
0'Donne11. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None.
Date published
Prepared by Eleanor M. Dilkes, City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5030
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 4, ENTITLED "ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES",
CHAPTER 5, ENTITLED "PROHIBITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS", OF THE
CITY CODE TO PROHIBIT PERSONS WHO ARE UNDER NINETEEN (19)
YEARS OF AGE FROM ENTERING OR REMAINING IN ESTABLISHMENTS
WITH LIQUOR CONTROL LICENSES OR WINE OR BEER PERMITS
BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10:00 P.M. AND CLOSING.
WHEREAS, underage drinking in Iowa City has a significant and negative impact on the
health, safety and welfare of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, as evidenced by the number of charges for Possession of Alcohol Under
the Legal Age, a significant number of persons under the legal drinking age are accessing
alcohol in establishments whose primary purpose, particularly after the hour of 10:00 p.m., is the
sale of alcoholic beverages; and
WHEREAS, the Iowa City City Council desires to prevent persons under the age of
nineteen (19) from entering or remaining in such establishments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
IOWA CITY, IOWA:
Section I. AMENDMENT. Title 4, entitled "Alcoholic Beverages", Chapter 5, entitled
"Prohibitions and Restrictions" of the City Code is hereby amended to add a new section 8 as
follows:
Section 4-5-8: PERSONS UNDER LEGAL AGE IN LICENSED OR PERMITTED
ESTABLISHMENTS.
A. No person, individual, association, corporation, partnership or club holding a
liquor control license, wine or beer permit, which authorizes on the premises
consumption, nor his or her agents or employees shall allow a person who has not yet
attained the age of nineteen (19) years of age to enter or remain in the licensed or
permitted establishment between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and closing.
B. However, the provisions of subsection (A) shall not apply when:
(1) The person under nineteen (19) years of age is an employee of the license or
permit holder, or performing a contracted service for the license or permit holder
on the premises, and is on the premises during his or her scheduled work hours.
(2) The person under nineteen (19) years of age is accompanied by a parent,
guardian, spouse or domestic partner registered as such under Section 2-6-3 of
the City Code who is nineteen (lg) years of age or older.
(3) The licensee or permittee applies for and qualifies for an exception certificate
from the chief of police, or his or her designee, as follows:
(a) A licensee or permittee whose primary business purpose is not the sale of
alcoholic beverages, wine or beer may qualify for an exception by filing with
the City Clerk a verified statement from a certified public accountant or an
accountant which establishes that on average over a calendar year more
than fifty (50) percent of the licensee's or permittee's gross sales on the
premises are from the sale of goods or services other than alcoholic
beverages, wine or beer, which sales shall not include income from fees
charged to gain entry to or remain on the premises, such as cover charges,
drink mixes or any part of an alcoholic beverage as defined in Chapter 123
of the State Code. The statement shall state the actual percentage of such
sales and be based on records made in the regular course of the licensee's
or permittee's business.
(b) In addition to the aforementioned statement, proof of qualification for the
exception may include the business records on which the statement is
based, state and federal tax records, applications for dram shop insurance
and audits performed to determine dram shop insurance premiums, and
receipts from vendors for goods purchased, which records shall be made
available to the Chief of Police or designee for review upon request.
(c) The Chief of Police or designee shall issue an exception certificate if the
licensee has satisfied the above requirements.
(d) An exception certificate shall be effective for the duration of the alcoholic
liquor control license, wine or beer permit.
(e) A new licensee or permittee as opposed to one applying for a renewal of an
existing license or permit, whose primary business purpose in not tl'ie sale of
alcoholic beverages, wine or beer may obtain a temporary 6 months
exception certificate if the licensee's or permittee's business plan anticipates
sales as required by subsection 3(a) of this section and the licensee or
permittee submits an affidavit which details the nature of the new
establishment and the anticipated percentage of sales of food and non-
alcoholic beverages. At the end of the 6 month period the licensee or
permittee may obtain an exception certificate for the remainder of the
duration of the license or permit in accordance with subsections (a) through
(c) hereof if sales during the 6 month period support an exception.
(f) To be effective in excepting the licensee or permittee from the prohibition in
subsection A hereof, the exception certificate issued by the Chief of Police or
designee must be posted at every entrance to the licensed or permitted
establishment in view of patrons of the licensed or permitted establishments.
(4) The person under nineteen (19) years of age is on the premises during a time
that the licensee or permittee has, in accordance with a written notice and plan
given in advance to and approved by the Chief of Police or designee, suspended
dispensing alcoholic beverages on the licensed premises. Said plan must
provide a method by which alcoholic beverages will be out-of-sight and reach of
patrons. If the plan is approved, the Chief of Police or designee shall issue a
certificate approving the event, which certificate shall be posted at every
entrance to the licensed establishment in view of patrons of the licensed or
permitted establishment. It shall be the strict duty of a licensee or permittee
permitting such persons under nineteen (19) years of age onto the licensed
premises pursuant to such a plan, and the agents and employees of the licensee
or permittee, to prevent persons under the legal age from consuming or
possessing alcoholic beverages on said premises.
C. Between 10:00 p.m. and closing, no person under'nineteen (19) years of age
shall enter into or remain on the premises of a licensed or permitted establishment which
authorizes on the premises consumption unless:
(1) the person is accompanied by a parent, guardian, spouse or domestic partner
registered as such under Section 2-6-3 of the City Code who is nineteen (19)
years of age or older;
(2) the person is an employee of the licensee or permittee or performing a
contracted service for the license or permit holder on the premises, and is on the
premises during his or her scheduled work hours; or
(3) a valid exception certificate is posted pursuant to subsection 4-5-8(B)(3) of this
Section or a valid certificate approving a non-alcoholic event is posted pursuant
to subsection 4-5-8(B)(4) of this section.
D. Unless a valid exception certificate under the provisions of 4-5-8(B)(3) of this
Section has been obtained and posted, or a certificate approving a non-alcoholic event
under the provisions of Section 4-5-8(B)(4) of this Code has been obtained and posted
for the duration of the event, the holder of a liquor control license, wine or beer permit,
which authorizes on premises consumption, shall obtain from the City Clerk and post a
notice at every entrance to the licensed or permitted establishment in view of patrons of
the licensed or permitted establishment, stating:
Notice to Persons Under Nineteen (19) Years of Age.
You are subject to a fine of $250.00 for being on these premises between the
hours of 10:00 p.m. and closing unless:
1. you are accompanied by a parent, guardian, spouse or domestic partner
registered as such under Section 2-6-3 of the City Code who is nineteen
(19) years of age or older; or
2. you are an employee of this establishment or performing a contracted
service with respect to this establishment and are on the premises during
your scheduled work hours.
Said notices will be prepared by the City Clerk and available at no charge.
E. (1) A person under nineteen (19) years of age who violates the provisions of
subsection (C) of this section is guilty of a simple misdemeanor punishable by a
penalty of Two Hundred Fifty and 00/100 Dollars ($250.00)
(2) Violation of the provisions of subsections (A) or (D) of this section shall be a
municipal infraction.
Section I1. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the
provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section III. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be
adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudicated invalid or
unconstitutional.
Section IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect on August 1, 2003.
Passed and approved this day of ,20
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
.¢[~/oved by: ,, ~
City Attorney's Office
Eleanor~ord\under21ordinance.doc
Ordinance No.
Page ..
It was moved by and seconded by that the Ordinance
as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
Champion
Kanner
Lehman
O'Donnell
Pfab
Vanderhoef
Wilbum
First Consideration 4/22/03
Voteforpassage:AYES: Vahderhoef; Wi]burn, Champion, Kanner, Lehman, 0'Donne'l],
NAYS: Pfab. ABSENT: None.
Second Consideration 5/5/03
Vote for passage: AYES: Vanderhoef, Wi]burn, Champion, Kanner, Lehman, 0'Donne]],
Pfab. ~IAYS: None. ABSENT: None.
Date published
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr
From: Mjuv@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 8:11 AM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: 21 Only in bars
The outcry from bar owners about the proposed new law should terl you how much money they make selling alcohol to
under age kids. They wouldn't yell so loud if they were selling them Pepsi! Now they want to take steps to really identify
the under age people. That says they haven't been doing doodle squat up to this point! My daughter worked at a local
bar as a waitress. She was given no instruction about checking ID's_.. And it was one recently cited for selling to
underage kids. They really just want to make money. Underage drinking is not a problem for bar owners, in fact, it's
profitable!
Mike Juvenal
2327 Cameron Way
Iowa City
4/23/03
Marian Karr
From: James Dreier [mudrums@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 10:32 PM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: No to the 21 law
Please read the following letter to the editor that I
am sending in. It's for your eyes mainly. Thank you.
James Dreier
424 N. Van Buren
Iowa City, IA 52245
(319) 354-7115
Letter to the editor
West High School wins the Iowa Jazz Championships
(again). City High places 6th and is the selected to
play at the annual Iowa Bandmasters Association
Conference. 3 to 5 students from the coumlunity
perform with the "All-State Jazz Band" each year.
Many go on to prestigious jazz schools and rich
musical lives.
Why does Iowa City succeed in producing such highly
skilled jazz musicians? It is a truly remarkable
accomplishment, and one that rarely gets the attention
it deserves. Of course the first nod is to the
hard-working students and the parents who support
them. Our cor~nunity also has outstanding jazz
educators at all levels and features many live
performance opportunities for young people {Pod-Mall
music, Iowa City Jazz Festival, Iowa Arts Festival, UI
concerts, etc.).
But there is another critical asset in the Iowa City
jazz conm~unity. It is a "club;" a "bar;" the
Sanctuary Restaurant to be exact. The Sanctuary is a
rare gem; a live music club/restaurant that is
comfortable, music friendly and fun to be in. Darryl
(Woody) Woodson has run the place with blood, sweat
and tears (not always his own) for many years, and his
col~nitment to quality live music has benefited the
I.C. community which, in turn, tries to regulate him
out of business. In spite of it all, Woody has
consistently invested in jazz.
Many young musicians and jazz lovers (including my
high school and college age children) go there to hear
jazz from around the world and around the block. In
fact, the scene at the Sanctuary (including the
Thursday night jam sessions) draws jazz lovers from
across Iowa and the country. It is a vital and
czeative scene in an alcoholic establishment that does
not promote under-age or binge drinking.
As a jazz educator and musician, I believe that the
opportunity for young people to hear jazz {and other
styles) in a live-music club is critical to their
education and musical lives. If the "21 Only' law
goes into effect, the Sanctuary will be unavailable to
!
a majority of the young people who want to go there.
Other live-music venues will suffer as well. This
will have a ripple affect, and will diminish the
cultural integrity that Iowa City loves to brag about.
As the City Council lines up the many un-intended
consequences of this well-intentioned, if inept,
attempt at behavior modification, please include this
one. You will be preventing young people from
entering a jazz-sanctuary that promotes an
appreciation of the art and the discipline to achieve
it. Your message will be clear: If you are under 21,
this Sanctuary is not for you.
James Dreier
Musician
Assitant professor (jazz/percussion)
University of Iowa
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr
From: Mjuv@aol.com
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 12:20 PM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: Under 21 Drinking Age
I thought you're going to do the right thing, but, at the last minute, you backed away. Sad, sad, sad! I realize that the
biggest business constituency in this city is bar owners. It must be hard to ignore that, but when faced with the potential
lives lost from underage drinkers driving or becoming addicted following being in downtown bars, the choice seems a no-
brainer.
You, of course, realize that bar owners will lose substantial profits if 21 only came to pass; profits from selling liquor to
minors.
The bar owners and students have had decades to deal with the problem. Why do you think they will address it now?
They won't! They're stalling.
Quit pussyfooting around. Either do the right thing and keep kids out of bars, or quit pretending that you really want to do
something about a problem!
Mike Juvenal
2327 Cameron Way
Iowa City
4/28/03
March 6, 2003 ~ ~
City Council of the City of Iowa City ; i~ "¢~:t ,~:~'j"' 2 ~ ;~
410 E. Washington
iowa City, Iowa 52240 C~'' ' ~
RE: Proposed ordinance to prohibit underage adults from entering alcoho ia ~ t :.' -'
establishments.
Dear Iowa City Council Members,
I am writing to you to express my objection to the passing of an ordinance, which would
prohibit underage adults from entering an alcohoMicensed establishment. I
acknowledge that underage ddnking and over consumption of alcohol are issues that
should be addressed in Iowa City, but I believe that the proposed etd nance would have
negative effects on my community for the following reasons:
1. Bars and restaurants provide a safer environment than private parties.
2. It is not illegal to dance, play billiards and arcade games, attend drag shows, attend
concerts and bands, listen to poetry readings, watch comedy shows or socialize.
3. The ordinance will force several entertainment venues out of business.
4. Many restaurants that are subsidized by the entertainment venues will be forced out
of business.
5. Late night dining will be restricted.
6. Many full time jobs and hundreds of high paying student jobs will be lost.
7.. Students will be less likely to attend The University of Iowa. Students will be less
likely to have visitors come to Iowa City.
8. Bars and restaurants contribute a substantial amount of money to Iowa City charities
and philanthropies.
I agree that underage drinking and over consumption of alcohol is an issue in Iowa City.
I do not agree new regulation or laws are the way to solve it. I suggest enforcing current
laws, education, social norming and forming a task force of community members to work
together with the city are better alternatives to solve the issue.
Pdnt Name: ~.T_A/5~-~?.~-~,LL/~L~ Age (Optional): '[?L
Address: ~0(J ~J.~-¢{9(~ V~,~ ~ (-i'¢,~ ~
Additional Comments: ¥~u 5¢0'~b ~A, ¢~'~- 0~ [/)(~. _pr~Jr/~qS~-~b~
Marian Karr
From: Reichardt, Mary [mary-reichardt@uiowa.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 8:12 AM
To: 'cou ncil@iowa-city.org'
Subject: 19 only rule
Dear Council Members:
I am deeply disappointed in your inability to do what is best for this city
as a whole. I am a law-abiding citizen who pays all kinds of taxes and have
for years. I thought you had found the courage and the backbone to do what
was right overall and not just for one small group of destructive
individuals who drink too much and want no one interfering with that
irresponsible and destructive behavior, who pay little in taxes and move on
after four or five years, never looking back to see the damage they have
done. I can not conitnue to vote for people who can not support the people
who are law-abiding, tax paying citizens and who deserve to have a downtown
area they can live, work and play in.
Mary Reichardt
Marian Karr
From: Matthew McGrath [mcgrath_matthew@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 12:09 PM
To: cou ncil@iowa-city.org
Subject: 19 Ordinance: Take Your Time Council
Council Members of Iowa City,
I just wanted to say that the 19 ordinance is a step in the right
direction, more so than the 21 ordinance at least. But, I do have to say,
why rush the passing of the 19 ordinance? If you rush, you are bound to
make mistakes in the wording, and mistakes are one thing the Iowa City
Concils already tarnished reputation does not need. I did 4 years active
duty service with the Marine Corps and was lucky enough to have the chance
to travel all over the United States and the world. Out of all the towns
and cities I~ve visited and lived in, Iowa City has to be one of the most
messed up I've ever seen. The city council has its priorities backwards.
Lay off the students, they aren't going anywhere, you knew that when you
moved here. Lay off the students and wake up and smell the coffee. Iowa
City doesn't have a crime problem, as much as you want to believe we do, for
the drama effect or whatever reason. What we do have in this city that the
council needs to wake up and see are parking problems, insane housing costs,
homeless people, traffic problems, older citizens against younger citizens
and vice versa, businesses leaving town, etc. Those are the problems you
need to pay attention to, because if you don't this city will go down the
drain and end up like Waterloo or a town like it. Lay off these so called
"pride" missions against the bars and students, hell, that's the only
business there is downtown. Don't let this town go to waste, it's in your
hands city council, show us what you can do.
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Marian Karr
From: James P. and Maureen Patterson [jpatters@inav.net]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2003 2:03 PM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: Please Say NO to 19-only
Dear City Council,
In the past, I have expressed my enthusiasm for the 21-only ordinance. {See
the message I sent below.) Today, I write to express my profound
disappointment for the 19-only ordinance.
If you approve this ordinance again, the statement will be clear: You
support underage drinking. Let's face it, that will be the result of your
decision. Underage drinkers will continue to binge drink at the bars. At
taxpayer expense, the police will be forced to do extra duty enforcing it,
and the vandalism that occurs will be costs all of us will have to pay.
Even worse, you will promote a culture that says, "Stressed out? Have a
drink. Need to relax? Drink. Want to have fun? Drink. Need to loosen up?
Alcohol will solve your problems."
The example set by other cities with 21-only ordinances is that younger
people do find better things to do than to drink. This lesson lasts a
lifetime.
In all your "compromise" discussion, you forget that the citizens of Iowa
City who voted for you have a stake in your decision, too, not just bar
owners and students. There are a lot more of us than there are them. I do
not feel like you are representing us at all. We may not protest: We're too
busy working, paying taxes in Iowa City, and raising our families here. But
we care about this community. And we vote. We matter.
This 19-only ordinance will do nothing to solve the problems of underage and
binge drinking. In fact, it will make it worse. I strongly encourage you to
vote down this ordinance and to head back on the right track, that of
21-only.
Thank you,
Maureen Patterson
1804 Grantwood Drive, Iowa City
From: "James P. and Maureen Patterson" <jpatters@soli.inav.net>
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: I strongly support 21-only
Date: Wed, Mar 12, 2003, 10:45 AM
Dear Council Members,
I understand that 4,000 university students have submitted form letters
opposing the 21-only ordinance. The sound of that would make one assume the
tide is turning against the ordinance. I hope that's not the case, because
Iowa City needs a 21-only ordinance.
So do the students, though they may not think so right now. I probably would
be on their side if I was underage: before I knew enough about the dangers
of alcohol, before I'd watched people struggle with alcoholism, and before I
watched a person close to me die from the effects of it.
There really is more to do in this town than to get drunk. If you pass this
!
ordinance, I'm convinced that students will find healthier ways to have fun.
This is a vitally important lesson for them to learn, one that will make
their lives better for the rest of their lives.
In the meantime, I as a resident will have a safer place to live. There will
be less destruction to the town, and the police can spend more time policing
the neighborhoods than giving 18-year-olds tickets for drinking.
Regarding those 4,000 form letters, were those submitted by people who vote
in Iowa City? I suspect many, if not most, do not, and if this is true, then
why should they have a say in how this city is run? Even if those students
do vote here on occasion, should they really be dictating laws that will
stay on the books forever? They're interested in the short-term effects on
themselves. I've lived here almost 12 years, and I'm interested in the
long-term effects on everyone in this community.
The students may have the numbers, plus the backing of Anheuser and other
corporate sponsors. Neither of those groups serve the best interest of this
community. Please continue on your hard work to pass a 21-only ordinance.
Thank you for your time,
Maureen Patterson
I804 Grantwood Drive, Iowa City