HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-12-2023 Historic Preservation CommissionIowa City Histo
ric Preservatio
�� L
Thursday .L,
October 12, 2023 n.0 C:
1'
5:30 p.m. ' '
11111111
e I�
(AC,
fU4�
)r
i
\ �I
i IIII
} i
i' l k
Emma J. Harvat Hall 'Y!
City Hall
n Commission
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, October 12, 2023
City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street
Emma J. Harvat Hall
5:30 p.m.
Agenda
A) Call to Order
B) Roll Call
C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
D) Certificate of Appropriateness
1. HPC23-0061: 1047 Woodlawn Avenue — Woodlawn Historic District (new rear deck and repairs to
earlier addition)
E) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff
Certificate of No Material Effect —Chair and Staff review (deferred from September meeting)
1. HPC23-0043: 518 South Lucas Street — Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District (concrete site
stair replacement)
2. HPC23-0047:
314 South Governor Street — Governor -Lucas Conservation District (concrete site stair
replacement)
Minor Review —Staff
review (fast 4 deferred from September meeting)
1. HPC23-0037:
738 Rundell Street - Longfellow Historic District (deteriorated window and door
replacement)
2. HPC23-0041:
521 South Governor Street — Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District (vinyl siding
removal and historic siding and trim repair)
3. HPC23-0044:
707 Runde]] Street — Longfellow Historic District (overhead door replacement)
4. HPC23-0046:
1328 Muscatine Avenue — Longfellow Historic District (roof shingle replacement)
5. HPC23-0060:
737 Grant Street — Longfellow Historic District (front step replacement)
Intermediate Review —Chair and Staff review
1. HPC23-0052:
1025 Woodlawn Avenue — Woodlawn Historic District (new barn foundation)
2. HPC23-0055: 521 South Governor Street— Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District (shutter
installation)
F) Consideration of Minutes for September 14, 2023
G) Commission Discussion
1. 302 (316) East Bloomington Street, Slezak Hall
2. HP Awards
H) Adjournment
If you will need disabilityrelatedaccommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact Jessica Bristow,
Urban Planning, at 319-356-5243 or at Jessica-bristow@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow
sufficient time to meet your access needs.
Staff Report October 9, 2023
Historic Review for HPC23-0061: 1047 Woodlawn Avenue
General Information:
Owner: Jenny Gordy, jennygordy@gmail.com
Applicant/Contact Person: John Martinek, Modern Roots Design Build,
jnmartinek@yahoo.com
District: Woodlawn Historic District
Classification: Contributing
Project Scope: New rear deck and repairs to rear addition
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations
4.1 Balustrades and Handrails
5.0 Guidelines for Additions
5.2 Decks and Ramps
Property History:
Built in 1888, this cross -gable house presents a somewhat "Gothic" effect, due to the
step pitch of the roof and the pairs of small, second story windows with flat -sided
pointed head on the north and west sides. The north and west gable ends are
decorated with lacy vergeboards. On the north, is a first floor protruding polygonal bay,
with bracketed cornice and iron cresting on the roof. It is probably that a similar bay was
located on the west side. A one-story rear addition was built by 1915. It was expanded
with an upper story at an unknown date. In 1984, another small one-story addition was
added behind that and then a larger one-story sunroom addition was constructed across
the back of the house in a somewhat Post-modern design. A screened porch is included
in the east portion of the addition.
Detailed Project Description:
This project involves the removal and replacement of an existing heavily deteriorated
modern deck structure at 1047 Woodlawn. When the existing structure is removed,
repairs will be made to deteriorated framing and siding on the home. The new deck will
be attached to existing sunroom, mudroom, and screen porch area or the 1984 addition.
The deck will be roughly L-shaped running approximately 20 feet along the back of the
house and projecting 21'-6" south from the house. Materials to be used are as follows:
the structural framing will be pressure treated lumber; the deck surface and steps will be
composite deck boards; the deck railing will be painted wood to match the dark green
trim color on the house with a square spindled balustrade style. The deck skirting on the
east side will be simple, framed vertical skirting. The owners would also plan to
incorporate a hot tub into the design. For the wall repairs, a vertical corner trim to match
the corner trim on the rest of the addition (dark green) will be installed and then wood
lap siding (tan color) to match the existing lap siding will be installed.
Guidelines:
Section 5.2 Decks and Ramps of the guidelines recommends:
• Locating a new deck on the back of a primary building, opposite the street -facing
facade and set in from the side walls at least 8 inches.
• Designing decks so that the size, scale and location do not detract from the
character of the district's rear yards, if significant to the district.
• Attaching decks to the building in a manner that will not damage a historic
exterior wall or, other historic materials, or cause wood siding to deteriorate.
• Following the guidelines in section 4.1 Balustrades and Handrails.
It is disallowed to leave balusters and railings unpainted if they are highly visible from
the street.
Section 4.1 Balustrades and Handrails of the guidelines recommends:
• Constructing or replacing missing balustrades by using historic photographs or
by choosing a style that is consistent with the architectural style of the building.
• Installing ... square spindles that are 1-1/2 inches or greater in width.
• Installing top and foot rails that are at least 2 inches in thickness.
• Sloping the top and foot rails slightly to allow water to be shed from these
surfaces and help prevent deterioration of these members.
It is disallowed to use unpainted treated wood for elements that would have been
painted in the historic application.
Analysis:
In Staffs opinion, the existing deck was not installed with proper flashing, leading to
damage to the exterior wall. The upper portion of the wall was also damaged from other
sources. The wall will be repaired with lap siding and trim matching this portion of the
house. The new deck will be installed to avoid damage to the existing wall. The new
deck will be constructed of wood with piers below, skirting to enclose the area, a
composite floor and a railing that follows the guidelines.
The proposed deck will not be set in 8 inches from the side walls of the house. Instead,
it will be flus with the east wall of the screened porch addition which projects about five
feet east of the historic house. Approval of the deck will require an exception to the
guidelines. Even though the deck (and the screened porch to which it is attached) is not
set in from the side walls of the historic house, the deck is located behind the house in a
heavily wooded lot in a heavily wooded neighborhood on a private drive. The deck will
not be visible from the street or from any of the neighboring houses. Aligning the deck
with the existing screened porch will avoid adding more complexity to the already
complex rear addition to this house. Staff recommends approval through the use of an
exception to the deck portion of the guidelines for an Uncommon Situation.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 1047
Woodlawn Avenue as presented in the application through the use of an exception to
the guidelines for the uncommon situation created by the existing rear addition to the
house.
Mail �� ♦ '1 ., � �.� � Jy� 1 d �r �( L �1� �:' 'f'
.. � �` u i w� F o `FM1 •.'Q u v � � '�`� J'� C yC -.r
1 I,
ti
IL
s
rl
<ac+ fix„
/ a
h `�
-jx - --"- , - .
"P
1047 Woodlawn Photos
MATERIALS:
Deck St it ur preseE wood
sure
TlmberTlec�Azek bmt Ms Surface
Rang:
paintetl wood, with square posts,
square 1- balusters and top cap railing
Skirting'
this waotl pasts exposetl win
5 12'�..d fusi eilli all %Mon.
to the back of the frame in the
mlmtcM1 exlieeng s screened comb skirting
MODERN ROOTS
DESIGN ♦ BUILD
21 u .
GORDY
GILLESPIE
RESIDENCE
FLAN
wammec
new iii existing Mick existing sklding
calUmn
Deck Structure:
,,..sure treated! wood
Deck, Planters and Stairs Surface
Thirecb Azek brands
Palling'
pqi= wom, wkM1 square posts,
square 1"balusters antl to, ca„ailing
Sklding:
Me—d poets exposed with
d"'skirting in Metween;
W the back Ulai8Imei the Btanad
rn
m.gralattice
s� ng screened pomp skirting
0 C12 �%'h
MODERN ROOTS
DESIGN a BUILD
GORDY
GILLESPIE
RESIDENCE
6EVAilONB�
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14. 2023 —5:30 PM —FORMAL MEETING
EM MA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
CALL TO ORDER:
Nicole Villanueva, Noah Stork, Margaret Beck, Deanna Thomann, Carl
Brown, Jordan Sellergren, Andrew Lewis, Christina Welu-Reynolds, Frank
Wagner
Jessica Bristow
David Villanueva, Sharon DeGraw
Sellergren called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None.
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS:
HPC23-0049: 813 Rundell Street— Dearborn Street Conservation District (roof alteration at screened
porch):
Bristow began the staff report noting this is on the edge of the Dearborn Street Conservation District
and is a contributing building. It is a brick house with a front -facing gable and lap siding. In the front
entryway is a California window and recessed entry. This project is about the roof so Bristow showed
an aerial image showing the roof line, noting it is a ranch house with a main hip roof and a gable roof on
the front. This project is about the screened porch which was on the back and originally built as part of
the house. It has an effectively flat roof with a very low slope and it's been causing deterioration from
water. The project is to replace the flat roof with another gable roof and it would be at the same slope
as all the other roofs on the house. Bristow showed an image of the south side of the screen porch
noting the eave line for the screen porch actually steps down a little bit and there's a fascia board
around the top of the wall so another part of the project is to raise that to match the rest of the house.
Bristow stated in the guidelines regarding additions they talk about continuing the horizontal lines on
the house so they determined that they would go ahead and raise it.
Bristow noted the guidelines that are associated with this project are from section 4.7 Mass and Roof
Lines. With this project they will be preserving the historic trim such as crown molding, skirt and frieze
boards. Replacing with wood to match is the recommendation and what they propose to do. Also
preserving the original roof pitches and spans is required but the proposed project does not do that so
there is an exception in this section available to all properties in all districts: minor changes to the roof
pitch to address drainage can be done on a case -by -case basis. The Commission would approve that
as an exception to the guidelines because it was necessary here in order to solve a drainage issue.
Otherwise, the roof itself that they propose fits in with the guidelines to match roof pitches and roof
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 2 of 12
types and things like that. Since this house has a hip roof as the main roof, the decision could be made
to make this new porch roof be a hip roof but because of the fact that the front facing projection is a
gable roof that was the recommendation by staff to make the screen porch have a gable roof as well.
The new roof will have asphalt shingles to match the gable in the front with the lap siding and raising
the eave and soffit to match the main house. This project will also replace the battens and the screens
on the screen porch.
Staffs recommended motion is to approve the project as presented in the application through the use
of an exception to the guidelines.
Stork noted that that fascia board was going to line up with the roof line but they didn't have to do that
because the whole project's an exception or because they can match the existing conditions so they
could leave it where it is. Bristow confirmed they could do that but because they're changing the roof
anyway it would then follow the guidelines and match. They could go in either direction with that
particular detail either raising the part to match the frieze board or maintaining it where it is.
MOTION: Wagner moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 813
Rundell Street, as presented in the application through the use of an exception to the
guidelines. Thomann second.
A vote was taken and the motion carried on a vote of 9-0.
HPC23-0050: 320 East Colleae Street — Local Historic Landmark (sianaae
Bristow began the staff report nothing this is a local Historic Landmark in the Iowa City Downtown
Historic District and reminded everyone the Downtown Historic District is only a National Register
Historic District (not requiring review of projects) so they're reviewing this project because it's also a
local landmark. The property is the Trinity Episcopal Church on the corner of College and Gilbert
Streets. The church was built in the 1870s and has had several projects such as sign projects, roofing
projects and there was a big project that replaced the foundation.
The current project is to replace the sign, it is a modern wood sign, and the Commission doesn't have
any specific guidelines about signs in the handbook. Therefore, they review signs against the
Secretary of Interior standards. If this building was a downtown business, then they would review it
against the Iowa City Downtown District sign guidelines but those also follow the Secretary of Interior
standards. Bristow stated they will discuss not only the sign design but the material as well. There is a
section of the guidelines about wood. The Guidelines would recommend substituting a material in place
of wood only if the substitute material retains the appearance and function of the original wood and that
substitute material must be durable except paint and be approved by the Commission. The guidelines
disallow substituting a material that does not retain the appearance, function and paintability of wood.
For the Secretary of Interior Standards, the basic standards related to this project say exterior
alterations shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property but the existing sign is not
a historic sign. The sign will be placed in the yard near where the existing sign is so there won't be any
historic materials that will be damaged. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be
compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the
property. Bristow stated one of the things that they would look at for a monument sign is whether or not
that sign speaks to or works with the architecture and so that would satisfy standard nine. Standard 10
is adjacent new construction or related work shall be undertaken in a matter that if removed in the
future the essential form and integrity of the historical property would be unimpaired. Again, given the
location and installation that would be satisfied.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 3 of 12
Bristow showed the site plan for the church building noting the main historic portion and the more
recent addition and the historic Parish Hall. She noted that to meet the zoning code and the sign permit
application it has to be set back 30 feet on each direction from the corner and that it's a certain height.
She showed an image of the proposed design for the new sign noting it'll have posts similar to the
existing ones and then there will be a board that is suspended with several things that Trinity already
has on their signage.
The application was submitted to make the sign board itself out of HDU, which is a high -density
urethane, and her research took her to at least two main web pages that talked about the fact that it's
has become an industry standard for carved signs because they're not going to deteriorate in the
weather, are paintable and it can be worked like wood. Bristow showed an image the applicant
submitted and also a statement that this sign uses the same material that's being installed in a historic
district in Washington DC right outside of National Park Service buildings. Given the research staff
would agree that at least for a monument sign that the HDU material would be an appropriate material
to approve. The Commission can just approve it for this project then or if interested in approving it for
all signs like this as an appropriate Commission approved material they can also make a motion and
vote on that.
Staff recommends approval of a certificate of appropriateness for the project of 320 East College Street
as presented in the application.
Welu-Reynolds asked that on the current sign the piece painted right now looks like it's a high gloss
paint. Bristow noted they are going to paint it red and so it is possible that they would use a high gloss
paint.
MOTION: Brown moves to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 320 East
College Street, as presented in the application. Stork second.
Welu-Reynolds asked how many applications the City gets for signs. Bristow replied about two or three
a year, with monument signs it's going to be churches, maybe a random business, or the Greek
houses, there's not going to be a lot of monument signs.
A vote was taken and the motion carried on a vote of 9-0.
Request Comment on a Proposal at 431 South Summit Street:
Villanueva recused herself from this discussion.
Bristow noted this house is in the Summit Street Historic District. She showed an image of the front of
the house stating this house was an Italianate house originally and was remodeled in the 1930s by a
local architect after a fire. It's also pretty obvious that the rear portion of this house was an addition at
some point in time. She stated this type of Italianate house is noted by the front proportion and the
rhythm of windows, it could have a wide eave overhang that probably would have had an internal gutter
in it and it would have had brackets. Bristow showed other examples of Italianate houses, including
one at 618 East Davenport is a local landmark and happens to have a Gable front roof. The house at
431 South Summit Street has a really low-pitched hip roof.
The overall project is to add an addition to the back of the house and during design review of the
project it became apparent that one guideline wasn't being met and it's a guideline that impacts the
location of the addition. So, prior to having the architect work on any design revisions that might be
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 4 of 12
needed staff wanted to come to the Commission to determine whether or not the Commission is likely
to approve an exception to the guidelines to allow the project to happen. The Commission won't be
making a motion or voting on this, it is really just to get a feel from the Commission to determine
whether or not it it's likely to be approved one way or the other.
Currently the house has a dining room and a kitchen in the rear of the house and part of the applicant's
reason for wanting to put the addition behind that is because they want to keep the historic dining room
as it has built-ins and a plaster cartouche in the ceiling. However, the kitchen is very small with
numerous doors that make one end of the kitchen not really usable.
The guidelines in question is section 5.1 Expansion of the Building Footprint which states that unique
setback guidelines exist for Summit Street and on this street the rear wall of the primary structure, the
house, must not extend deeper than 125 feet from the front street. The purpose of that restriction is it
preserves the openness of rear yards and then it refers to section 8.1 of the Neighborhood District
Guidelines which state on Summit Street only the rear wall of the primary structures must not extend
deeper than 125 feet from the front street. Unlike section 5.1, the Neighborhood District Guidelines are
not written as recommendations and there is not a specific documented exception to this guideline.
Bristow noted they have a few ways that exceptions happen with the guidelines, one they're
documented, for example the previous case regarding the roof that basically said if there's drainage
issues the Commission can decide. For this section no documented exception exists but the
Commission can apply exceptions of the guidelines through an uncommon situation. The Commission
has used that for instance because the guidelines actually disallow attached garages on Summit Street
and they've approved an attached garage because of the fact that the lot was too small to add a garage
that was not attached to the house, so an exception was made to the guidelines in that case to use an
exception to the guidelines.
Since the applicant knew about the situation, as part of the application they submitted some
measurements from a screenshot from the Johnson County property information viewer. Bristow noted
they use that viewer every day to measure from one place to another, and she noted two things: one is
the shapes seen are roof outlines so if somebody has a 24-inch soffit this is showing that whole size of
the roof not the walls so they do need to take that into consideration. Second, there are other things
such as making sure that the beginning and ending of measurement lines aligns properly with what you
are measuring. The applicant also provided distances of just the backyards which is also useful. Even
so, Bristow went through and measured the entire street for accurate measurements. When going
through on each property she noted two measurements, what was the eave overhang and tried to
come up with how far these rear walls are from the front street. She also looked at additions and when
additions were done and came up with the table that was included in the agenda packet.
Bristow pointed out 304 South Summit on the corner of Burlington Street and Summit Street extends
past 125 feet, but that was also a historic situation it was either the house was built that way or they
added on to it basically before 1942. The house at 624 Summit Street was actually just built really far
back on the lot and set back a lot further than everybody else. Overall, she found out of the 43
properties 14 did not follow that guideline. Of those, six happened before 1942, another three had
some kind of addition in the 1950s to 1970s, two were reviewed by the Commission in the 1980s or
1990s and that was before they had guidelines. Finally, three of them were reviewed more recently
and Bristow reviewed those. The first is 409 South Summit and they had a historic sleeping porch that
somebody had added and extended out prior to the 1970s and their project was enclosing the area
below it. The Commission didn't talk about that set back in regard to this project, but it did not extend
further than the existing building. The second is at 519 South Summit where they had an existing
addition and the project added an addition. The Commission had felt strongly that this improved the
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 5 of 12
appearance of the back of this house and that it would only project four and a half feet into that 125-foot
setback. The third is 330 South Summit and this was a project where it was adding on to the back of
the house a one-story bedroom/bath for the owner to age in place and then she wanted a porch that
matched the front porch. In this particular instance they determined that this house had the biggest lot
in that area and that even after this addition they would still have twice as much open space as anyone
nearby so it was approved.
At this point Bristow stated staff would not recommend approving an addition that extended past the
125 feet partly because staff doesn't find an uncommon situation or a limitation to apply an exception to
the guidelines, and also because they feel that there's an opportunity to put an addition on another
portion of the house instead. Effectively they could take the dining room space and move it outwards,
they would have to replace some of the materials in there and it would retain the exterior window on
both the north and west sides and then the extra space could be added to expand the kitchen. Staff
would recommend that this would at least allow an addition and better follow the guidelines.
Staff requests comments from the Commission if the Commission would consider the use of an
exception to the guidelines for an addition to 431 South Summit to extend past the setback limitation on
Summit Street. Bristow also wanted to note the house is only one foot from that limit right now so to
entirely meet the guidelines they have one foot. The City has regularly allowed properties to go to 126
so it is feasible to add something of a foot or two. Another option is would the Commission consider the
use of an exception for an addition that extends past the setback limitations less than the proposed 13
feet and if so what distance could it extend. The Commission has a role here of providing comment
whether they think that there's an exception that is warranted to allow them to put the addition entirely
behind the house and it is a 14-foot addition so that's where the 13-foot dimension comes from.
Wagner noted 138 feet back is where they would be if they approved the entire addition. He asked
what the square footage is roughly of the kitchen addition. Bristow believes it would be 14x18 but with
what staff would suggest it would only be slightly smaller, just off the side, not the back.
Stork noted however that suggestion basically destroys the dining room. Bristow clarified the
recommendation is saying put the addition on the south side of the house, however that works out.
Beck would definitely consider the addition going behind the house because it does preserve the dining
room. She asked how far the front of the house is from the front of the street. Bristow replied from one
of the dimensions that they provided they have 54 feet and it's aligned with the house next door. Beck
noted the addition would go 13 feet back and they still have quite a bit of space in the backyard before
it hits their garage, it's also in the back of the house so it would not be seen from the road, it preserves
the dining room, the stairs and things like that.
Wagner stated this just this looks like a very modern kitchen to him and the way it juts out that two feet
four inches is sort of contrary to what they usually say about an addition that it sets back in a foot well
and if they're sifting in their dining room and look out the window they'll see the corner of the house.
Brown stated it's set back from the main part of the house but not that kitchen area. Bristow stated they
have noted that as one of the recommendations in staff review to be revised. In the mass and roof line
section there is a guideline that requires that they retain the corners of the building so that one can
always tell the extent of the original building, it also solves some major roof issues. She stated whether
or not it is set in from that corner is not actually what they're concerned with right now.
Brown stated his sense is they're being asked to think about if they would be open to an exception and
his mind goes to what would be the reason for that exception and he doesn't think they have a reason
right now for an exception.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 6 of 12
Sellergren agrees and would say that this is opening floodgates for no limitations on making exceptions
after this because there's no necessary reason for this to happen besides wanting to have an addition.
She noted they can't not make exceptions, and this is the oldest historic district in the City so if they
don't draw the line here there's no line and the district guidelines are clear.
Brown stated if there were a reason for the exception, such as they've talked about with other auxiliary
units, and it could possibly happen but if there were some reason they could narrow the definition of
what that exception is maybe but he doesn't see a reason for the exception other than their kitchen's
really small and this is a better place to put it.
Sellergren doesn't think they're necessarily going to need to destroy the dining room, they can save
some of those pieces and build them in if they do extend to the south. She noted if they allow this
anybody can come in here and cite this as a precedent and it doesn't end at that point.
Thomann stated there is a precedent already through other properties. Wagner noted both of those are
corner lots.
Sellergren noted since she's been on the Commission this is the second major exception, they've made
to the guidelines to accommodate a Commissioner's work on their home and she personally doesn't
think it politically looks great. To approve a major addition like this that contradicts guidelines for a
Commissioner she is personally not comfortable with that.
Brown stated he thinks they do have to be flexible with the guidelines and possibly revisit this particular
guideline and decide is 125 really what they want. He does think 13 feet past the 125 guideline is too
far and they have to say there's no reason for an exception.
Lewis noted there are other houses expanded that far and no one seems to have any concern, yes
those were there before the guideline but still no one's complaining that it messes with the aesthetic of
Summit Street. In addition it's on the back of the house and there's been a lot of discussion about
things that happen on the back of the house that they seem to care about a little bit less than the
things that happen in the front of the house.
Thomann would also like to know where the 125 feet number originated from. Additionally, whether the
house is owned by a Commissioner or by Joe Schmoe is not the issue, they are trying to preserve that
dining room.
Sellergren noted there's also something to be said for buying a home in a historic district, the oldest
historic district in the town, and this is a luxury addition so to her it's very clear it's not an option unless
they revisit the entire neighborhood or have to be prepared for an influx of requests like this.
Stork stated this is a more unique guideline for this Commission and they don't normally see this
backyard -type preservation guideline. It's not so much a structure guideline it is more of a way of life.
Bristow stated she is sure the applicant believes saving the dining room is the reason for needing the
exception. The 125 feet likely came from the fact that most the houses tend to be that depth and when
coming up with that guideline they probably looked at what the length of general houses are and what
they tend to be set back at and used some math. They likely don't have documentation about why the
guidelines were set up in certain ways, but she does know that it was part of the 2004 guidelines.
She noted one major project that came up since she's been here regarding how far a house projected
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 7 of 12
into the rear yard was in 2015 at 610 Ronalds Street where the house was pretty small and a developer
bought it and he wanted to take it down claiming that it was structurally unsound and irretrievable, their
engineer said that the typical historic construction was structurally sound but that it was irretrievable
because of cat urine. As with any demolition the Commission has to look at the house but then also
review the design of the replacement house. They were going to replace it with a basic gable front
house that was two stories plus attic and it was aligned with the front facades but it was extending
further back than all of the neighbors. This was an issue because in the neighborhoods where there is
a rhythm of streets and alleys, being able to look across the backyards was part of that neighborhood
and so they suggested to the owner and architect that they limit the size of the building. The project
was not approved because of the length of the house extending into the rear yard and that is the just
the only example she can really think of where they really were looking at what was happening in the
space of the rear yards.
Welu-Reynolds noted if the diagram was lined up so that they could get a better sense of how things fit
in the yard comparatively it would be helpful. She had never even thought about site lines in the back
yards until now. Bristow did note on the map it shows the house next to it as shorter and then two of
the longer ones on either side. Site line may be less of an issue unless the neighbors really want to
see 419 South Summit.
Bristow noted it sounds like everyone has a lot of different opinions and they're not all saying yes
absolutely nor all saying no way. Perhaps they need to just poll each Commissioner because there are
costs here that will affect the applicant. It won't be as formal as a certificate of appropriateness vote
just a quick statement to gauge.
Wagner agrees about setting a precedent if they allow it but also doesn't like the way it's it looks, it
looks like a kitchen addition slapped on the back that doesn't belong with the house. He would say go
with what staff recommends as an addition with the dining room and say okay to adding five feet to the
back of the house to make it all bigger. That would look better and more in line with a lot of the other
homes in that area. He noted that there's this idea about the dining room and one of those two built-ins
in the corners, those are from the 1930s or 1940s, but they can get oak flooring or maple flooring and
put it on a diagonal to make the new dining room look like the old dining room and make the rest of the
house look like it's part of the house. In his estimation this addition does not work with that house and
they can still make the kitchen bigger.
Stork appreciates the fact that this meets the values of the Commission to keep the original structure
and it's a shame to care more about the outside than the inside. The application does seem to go
along with the values it just doesn't meet this one rule and that one rule just doesn't seem to apply in a
way that to him makes sense.
Sellergren asked: does the kitchen have to be that large, could it be a longer, narrower kitchen and still
be an efficient space.
Bristow stated the guidelines are for additions are really clear and start with a paragraph that says
figure out what addition will work with the exterior of the house then figure out what the interior does.
One shouldn't just work out an interior design they like and then make it fit, they should always have a
design that works on the exterior first. She reiterated the first question is the Commission okay with a
13 feet addition and the second question is would they be okay with anything less.
Wagner would be willing to entertain an exception based on what is the average of those properties
that go past the 125 feet. Go down the whole block and obtain the average, if the average over the limit
extension is eight feet then as a Commission they can say they are willing to make that exception
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 8 of 12
because that's the average. He stated set back averages are a thing that they do in general in non -
historic district zonings.
Brown asked about creating an exception and Bristow explained they would pick from the three types of
exceptions, those being a documented exception from the past, an uncommon scenario or no
applicable guideline existing. The Commission can apply an exception but they have to state the
reason for it. Brown is open to considering an exception of the 13 feet past the 125 feet.
Beck stated she is really torn between it being a super clear rule and 125 just being such an arbitrary
number. Thomann stated she doesn't feel like they're being frivolous or opening floodgates. This is a
historical addition to a historical house that will have to meet all guidelines. Beck added because the
fact that there is an older neighbor who got to do it because it was before 1950 makes it feel okay.
Stork stated if the guidelines are there to give everybody this nice, wonderful backyard he looks at the
size of this house and that lot and is not sure that's restricting the rear yard on this house.
Lewis asked does it actually preserve the openness of a rear yard, and who decides that.
Sellergren asked if the architect was aware of the guidelines and was this misjudged. She
acknowledges one of her hesitations is always not to make them spend more money or do more work
but maybe more work needs to be done in this case. Bristow stated the architect measured from the
property line instead and not the way it says from front street. Sellergren would like to see an
alternative design but is open to the possibility of an exception.
Brown is open to an exception, just not to the 13 feet because he doesn't see a justification for the 13
feet. Sellergren wants an alternative design, Stork is open to an exception, Welu-Reynolds is open to
an exception, Wagner is open and basing it on an average of those properties that are over the 125
feet. Beck is open to an exception to line up with a pre-1945 immediate neighbor. Lewis is open to an
exception, Thomann is not, but likes Wagner's idea to find a way to provide a limitation. She noted
there has to be a reason for preserving the dining room but that's interior uncommon it's got to be
something uncommon for the exterior. She doesn't feel this is setting a precedent because they review
every house individually.
Brown noted the homeowner has to present a reason for the exception correct and the Commission is
to figure out which of the three exceptions the reason fits in and then vote on whether they approve that
reason for the exception.
David Villanueva (431 South Summit Street) stated in retrospect upon making the application he notes
he failed to fully describe the full intent behind how they arrived at the design. The overall layout of the
current house has a very small kitchen, it's seven feet by eight feet, so functionally that's New York City
standards and not Midwest. He stated that's probably why when they first bought the home it had been
on the market for six months because not many people want to live with that small of a kitchen. When
they initially took a look at redoing the kitchen in terms of cost, they didn't want to build walls or have to
move out, and they wanted to try and keep the charm of the house without impacting as much of the
design as possible. They did look at just maybe tearing down some walls and trying to reconfigure
things but ran into issues. Part of the reason why just simply bumping out that southern dining room
wall, which seems like it's eight feet however they have take into account the fact they would still have
to set it back from that southern den wall by the eave height, which is at least probably six inches
maybe more, maybe less, and therefore ending up at about seven feet of space which they could
potentially work with but one of the things they tried to address in the design is functionally. The
kitchen is half that size and they cannot touch the staircase, at least not without unlimited funds, as well
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 9 of 12
as the rear entryway to the house. The current kitchen layout is not only too small but has a bottleneck
that creates barriers to open many things and it's also the primary pathway to two of the main places in
the house. Villanueva noted when they tried to address the staircase the first issue is leading into the
basement it's a 24-inch-wide space with 67 inches of headroom and it's an old basement and not going
to have modern tread heights. So part of the redesign tried to incorporate a reworking of that basement
entry and to try to funnel the rear entryway away from that choke point and try to create a little bit more
open space in the kitchen. When they tried to incorporate all those things into the current space it was
simply impossible, then when they tried to just bump out a couple feet one way or the other there was a
concern to minimize disturbing the overall feel as one of the goals originally had been to minimize
disturbance to the dining room because it is so beautiful and to bump out a couple of feet would have to
completely eliminate that dining room or at least move it and the built-ins and things like that and they
would still be very limited in the actual functional space they would gain. That is why their architect
ended up deciding trying to extend in the rear. He acknowledges they all accept this design could use
some work and it wasn't meant to be the final design. A problem they run into is they do have one of
the narrow lots on the street and have 60 feet total. The house is limited in terms of extending north
and they can't extend south so they're really left with no space to work with other than extending in the
rear yard. They wanted to bring this to the Commission because they did review guidelines and the
reason they included the average rear setbacks is to show they believe that they would not be violating
the inherent nature or intent of what the guidelines were meant to preserve which is a spacious rear
yard. By his very rough calculations approximately 134 feet is the average on Summit Street including
all the houses on the western side of Summit Street (which is where their house is). The average rear
yards on the eastern side of Summit Street tend to be much less. Villaneuva stated they believe 13
feet will still maintain a pretty spacious yard. The biggest reason they wanted to bring this to the
Commission is to find out if this would be a project worth pursuing, without some rear set back
modifications, the quantity of which they would leave up to the Commission and work with the architect
to see if there's something they could do that would also incorporate maybe the southern side as well.
However, if they are not allowed to violate that that rear setback at all they would have to put in a ton of
work and the kitchen probably still wouldn't function nor would it be a project worth pursuing. His bigger
sadness is ultimately this house by any modern standards does not function to what most people would
want or expect on Summit Street. Most of the houses on Summit Street that have those amenities sell
really quickly and the fact that their house took six months to sell shows that. Villaneuva wants to
make this a home that people see as worth preserving not only today but for generations to come but if
they don't make this house worth living in for families today then he worries what it would do for the
future because they are very limited and he doesn't see those limitations necessarily changing anytime
soon.
Welu-Reynolds asked if they weren't able to redo the kitchen are they thinking they'll move. Villaneuva
stated they don't have kids currently but if they did it would be impossible. Of course the past
generations obviously did it but he doesn't believe they would want to.
Beck noted these houses on South Summit and Brown Street and other historic neighborhoods
shouldn't just be for somebody who has a wheelbarrow full of money in the sense of having to be so
wealthy to afford these places to preserve them. Allowing this keeps a family in this house who wants
to stay in this house, there is a big picture to historic preservation about getting people to raise their
kids in these neighborhoods. She is not saying to willy-nilly allow anything but that's not what's
happening here, they have an architect and people who are invested in this neighborhood, whether the
owner is on the Commission or not has nothing to do with it, this is exactly who they want to see buying
these houses and living in these neighborhoods and she thinks they have some justification for looking
at a 13, 12, 14 or whatever addition on the back of this house because they do have the other two
properties on each side, one's 145 and one's 137 so that's a 141 average and this is going to be 138 so
she is totally open to an exception because this is exactly what the future is going to look like as they
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 10 of 12
need people to fix up these old houses and yet they shouldn't have to be so wealthy that they'll never
be able to afford a house on this street, especially potentially young families.
Sellergren stated she would still like to see another design
Villaneuva stated he doesn't think they'd be able to see another design if there was an ultimate
consensus that there's no give on the rear set back because it's not worth doing another design. He
thinks what they're hearing is that there may be potentially some give and with that in mind they could
potentially approach the architect again and say what is the best, most concise plan, but again that's
why they wanted to approach the Commission regarding the setback because without an
understanding of where they stand further steps may or may not be worthwhile.
The Commissioners agreed they are all open to an exception and Villanueva stated he has enough
information to help them move forward.
{Wagner left the meeting}
REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF:
Due to time and length of meeting, these items were not discussed.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR AUGUST 10, 2023:
MOTION: Thomann moves to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's
August 10, 2023, meeting, as written. Beck seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of
8-0 (Wagner was not present).
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Bristow gave an update on the Historic Preservation Awards. She will be assigning people who are
going to present and also working on writing the scripts. Commissioners have been helping with the
writing. The ceremony is Thursday September 28th at the Highlander, there will be cookies and juice at
5:00 with the presentation at 5:30. There will be a cash bar open right outside the area for milling
around and drinking afterwards.
(Brown left the meeting}
Bristow stated regarding the Planning and Zoning items she didn't pull any slides together and also
have not entirely read the memo but if there are questions, she can get answers or they can ask the
questions directly to the senior planners Anne Russett, Parker Walsh and Kirk Lehmann, they're all
interested in answering any questions. The memo talked about where they are in the process of the
ability to have accessory dwelling units more widely and they are having an open house to discuss that.
Sharon DeGraw (Iowa City) stated she is a former Commissioner and member of the North Side
Neighborhood and the Friends of Historic Preservation and one of the things that is of great concern to
them is a proposal for neighborhood stabilization for the RNS-12 zone and it deals with infill
development of single-family homes and duplexes. What they're asking for is for the height of those
new structures to have a 27 feet tall height limit. She stated it's good to take into consideration the way
that height is measured, 27 feet should sound not tall enough, but they measure from eaves to the apex
and divide that height in half. Walking around the North Side neighborhood one may see houses that
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 14, 2023
Page 11 of 12
look taller than 27 feet but it is really the first story, second story and then half of what that full top level
is. DeGraw stated they walked around and measured every house in the North Side Neighborhood and
could not find any structures that were single-family homes or duplexes that exceeded 27 feet. So, the
conversation might be okay when talking about the North Side neighborhood but what about the other
areas that have RNS-12. DeGraw stated they are starting to make contact with people in the College
Hill area and the long-term residents that they've spoken to like the idea because it's all for
neighborhood stabilization because a developer could come in and build something new in a non -
historic district and currently have the ability to go up to 35 feet, and might be able to go a little taller
than that perhaps in some of neighborhoods. A developer could remove a small cottage say and go up
to 35 feet tall and do significantly bumping out in the back in neighborhoods where there are more
modest structures and so some of the long-term residents and even newer residents who bought into a
certain kind of neighborhood are realizing that there could be major redevelopment. 27 feet will not
prevent redevelopment it just scales down what can be done when there is an RNS-12 lot that is right
against a historic or conservation district. In terms of redevelopment it would be nice for a new
structure to be similar to the neighboring homes and have the same proportions of height, density or
scale and mass. She acknowledged there's sometimes the viewpoint that it's your land and it's legal to
build what you want so they are thinking of how they can mitigate situations where things would be built
out of scale and height.
Sellergren asked does historic preservation has oversight over what can be built in many of these
neighborhoods. Bristow stated yes, but there could be a property that's right next door where the
boundary is. Sellergren noted then modifying the Planning and Zoning proposal would be to protect
those situations. Bristow acknowledged there was a case where a house was built or proposed right
next to a district and that house was tall and so the neighborhood came back with the idea of reducing
the 35-foot maximum that currently exists to a 27 foot.
DeGraw stated in that situation the design proposed was ultimately turned down through the Board of
Adjustment because it had a three -car garage on the ground floor level, no basement and the living
quarters were on the first floor and the second floor causing it to get so tall compared to other single-
family home buildings. She noted for the bulk of the zoning code amendments that would be made
people that are living in the close -in neighborhoods, some of them are historic neighborhoods, are liking
the idea if Council could suggest pull out the University Impact area for now if they want to go forward
in passing the zoning code changes because there are so many variables that have to deal with
development and intensity of wanting to build up those close -in neighborhoods that it could transform
neighborhood stabilization.
Bristow stated any further questions or concerns can be directed to the Planning and Zoning staff.
ADJOURNMENT:
Thomann moved to adjourn the meeting. Weu-Reynolds seconded. The motion carried on a vote
of 7-0 (Brown and Wagner absent).
The meeting was adjourned at 7:23 pm.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD
2022-2023
TERM
9/8
10/13
11/10
1/12
2/9
3/22
4/13
5/11
6/8
7/13
8/10
9/14
NAME
EXP.
BECK,
6/30/24
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
MARGARET
BOYD, KEVIN
6/30/23
X
X
X
X
X
X
0/E
X
X
BROWN,
6/30/23
X
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
X
CARL
LARSON,
6/30/24
O/E
O
--
--
--
KEVIN
SELLERGREN,
6/30/22
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
JORDAN
STORK, NOAH
6/30/24
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
THOMANN,
6/30/23
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
DEANNA
VILLANUEVA,
6/30/25
O/E
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NICOLE
WAGNER,
6/30/23
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
FRANK
WELU-
6/30/25
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
REYNOLDS,
CHRISTINA
LEWIS,
X
X
X
ANDREW
KEY: X = Present
O = Absent
O/E= Absent/Excused
--- = Not a member
®® 1 2 Iowa City
Historic Preservation Commission
City Hall, 410 E Wwhington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240
Memorandum
Date: October 9, 2023
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner
Re: 302 (316) East Bloomington Street, Slezak Hall
At the request of the Commission Chair, a discussion of the historic building at 302 (316) East
Bloomington Street is included in the agenda for discussion. The property is currently listed for sale.
The building, historically known as Slezak Hall was built originally in 1875 and likely included the 3-
story apartment addition to the rear (or it was constructed soon after). By 1888 the 2-story building
was added at the alley, which was a carriage house with a hoist, laundry, and sleeping areas. The
stable and feed storage wing (now laundromat) was also in place by that time. Site inventory forms
and photos are attached.
302 East Bloomington Street — Slezak Hall to left, Apartments (3-story) center, Carriage house (white
2-story) center, and stable to right.
IT7
I7
1� J
tt r yX�y►�
a-�
PIP,
w
iAiwfM
3;�
i
►mil
57
FAIR F/A.tE No/3T ��-
I
ti
a
I
o
r
�
�I
f>/k/dfI__
XA , / CIO
►I
I
•
I
C/7✓ WATER
.�WAlL AMT. UFSCENER
�
� �
� GFa'
V
Z►I
l
/NNA1L
K
L x �
x
_r-/.0
FE.G/ STEAM
II
Q IO
•ST OE
5'TIl✓ES,
- rWA' ;0MINrT0N.
1888 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing 302 (316) East Bloomington Street
IOWA SITE INVENTORY
Survey II) Number 52-010-DO19
Database ID Number
Nonwant
Location and F uncrio al rnformatinn
1.HistoricName($) National Hall (Slezak Hall)
2. Common Name(s)
3. Street Address 102 E_ Bloomington
4, City Iowa City Vicinity[] 3. County Tnhru;ort
6. Subdivision Original Plat 7. Block(s) 57 8. Lots) 5
9. Legal Description: (If Rural) Townsbip Range Section Quarter of Quarter
_ of
f
10. Historic Function(s) rYnnr+rcial 02
Fraternal / Meeting Hall on 2nd 03A
11.Current Funcdon(s) rxymip-vial (Rest) apartments 02G 01A
12.. Owner Vladimir Skarda Phone d
Address 412 N_ TAnn St_ City/State Iowa City, IA ZIP 52245
(Plat Map)
T
(Integrity Notes)
1888 - Front halves:
grocery I
Saloon in middle
Dining in back
Boarding in back
addition
1892 - Same but no saloo�t
1899 - Don't nave trap
1906 - W1/2 grocery
E1/2 saloon
hall on 2nd
Dining Roots in ba�k
Rear add - hotel
roans
OW912 - same
1920 - same
1926 - "store" in both
halves
Hall on 2nd
Boarding house in
rear
1933 - Same except "apts"
N
M8P)
S• r, �
S rse'a ,wno ''
LRJI Y
� � 5 3%A
N
E. BLOOMINGTON
Roll/Frame 6 / 5 Photographer Moraski/Kugler
N
IOWA SITE INVENTORY FORM
CONTINUATION SHEET
Survey ID Number 52-010—D 019
Database ID Number
Sueet Address 302 E. Hloottdmton City Iowa city County Johnson
Legal Description: (If Rural) Township Range Section Quarter of Quarter
Of
Roll/Frame it 1 15 looking ENE
Roll/Frame lA / 14 looking NW
1
North Side Neighborhood Preservation Study
Historic Structure Inventory block: 57
lot
address: 302-304 Bloomington no. 1349
present use: commercial Pizza Palace owner
present owner: Holub/Cont: Skarda occupied:
date of construction: 1875
building type and material: 3 story brick
architectural style: Italianate
condition: excellent
importance to neighborhood: important independent of surrounding structures
notable features of building and site:
This distinctive Italianate building not only has the typical
brackets under the eaves, dentil molding on the cornice and arched
windows, but is also notable for the unusual roof line both on this
building and on the adjoining Laundromat at 310 Bloomington.
original owner:
original use: commercial - Slezak Hall
historic significance:
Slezak Hall housed a complex of uses including a grocery
and a saloon on the first floor, a meeting room with a stage on the
second floor and hotel and boarding rooms at the rear in what is
now the Holub Apartments on Linn. The present Laundromat housed feed
for horses and carriages were kept in the low building at the rear of
the lot.
sources: Sanborn 1888, 1892, 1899
Weber
Z
Z
O
H
a
a
U
y
w
Y
Property Chaneterink Form - ResidentW
CFN 259-1402 Survey lDNumber 52-010—DO19
8/25/89 Database W Number
AM
....eetAddress 302 E. Bloomington City Iowa City County Johnson
Legal Description: (If Rural) Township Range Section Quarter of Quarter
Of
Location Integrity: Original Site X Moved c Moved to Original Site s
Endangered? NX or Y_ If yes, why?
Ground Plan: a. Building Shape(s) Rectangle b. Width 40 by Depth 80 in units
Rear wing width 45 depth 45
Architectural Style/Stylisdc Influences Key Stylistic Attributes Code
Late Victorian & Italixiate Bracketed cornice, round arched 42
windows, cast hood molds
• Roof
Number of Stories
Roof Shape
Builder(s)
;0 _. ..
2 - 3 on addition
,&ginal Construction Date 1875 Modification/Addition Dates:
date determined for rear (north) wing, but prior to 1882.
100
30
50
2 1/2
1
Original owner was Joseph Holub. His son, Joseph F. Holub continued the business, then
was succeeded by Joseph Slezak. Groups meet in the National Hall include the Bohemian
Society, "Trusti", "Slovanska Lipa" and "Zastit".
Condmodan SIMCL 1
Surveyor Comments:
Scrollwork on cornices and dorways
Parapet on south side
Paglia's Pizza
Originally complex contained a library, hotel, grocery and meeting hall. `
Sources: Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps: 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 19261 1933.
North Side Neighborhood Preservation Study: Historic Structure Inventory, 1977
Korth Side Survey 1981; N.R. nomination for North Side Ccmnercial District (not sutmitted)
ieeds Further Study/Anomaly ( I Continuation Sheet ( I
Surveyor Moraski/Erwin/xualer Date 1995-96
IOWA SITE INVENTORY FORM
EVALUATION SHEET
ADDRESS: 302 East Bloomington
Iowa City, IA
REVIEWED BY: Molly Myers Naumann, Consultant
ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE & ASSOCIATED CONTEXTS:
Dubuque/Linn Street Corridor: 1839—c.1946
SURVEY ID # 52-010—DO19
APPLICABLE NRHP CRITERIA: A B _ C __ XD _
NRHP ELIGIBILITY: INDIVIDUAL_ YES _X_ NO _
DISTRICT: CONTRIBUTING X NON—CONTRIBUTING
DATE: February 1996
Ibis two story brick commercial building from 1875 (with three story addition to the rear by 1883)
is individually eligible as a fine example of Italianate commercial design. It features tall slender
round arched windows on the second floor with simple brick hoodmolds, while on the first floor the
windows are segmental arched with brick hoods. The three story addition has more elaborate cast
hoodmolds. A bracketed wooden cornice surrounds both sections. Relatively few alterations have
been made over the years, but these include: bricking in an entrance on the secondary (west) facade
and putting in two small modern windows, bricking in a doorway on the west elevation, installation
of smaller windows at the second floor level, creating a new brick foyer or vestibule entry to the
rear wing, and new plate glass windows and entry door on the storefront. While these changes
sound extensive, the building actually maintains a very high level of integrity. It is individually
eligible and is considered to be a key structure in any historic district that would include Linn Street.
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE & ASSOCIATED CONTEXTS:
Dubuque/Linn Street Corridor: 1839—c.1946
APPLICABLE NRHP CRITERIA: A X B_ C D
NRHP ELIGIBILITY: INDIVIDUAL YES _X_ NO _
DISTRICT: CONTRIBUTING X NON—CONTRIBUTING
The National (Slezak) Hall was built for Joseph Holub in 1875 and is historically significant as a
major commercial building (grocery and saloon) in the small neighborhood business district, but even
more so as the meeting place of a number of Bohemian societies in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries. The second floor was built to serve as a meeting hall, while the rear addition functioned
as a hotel and dining room. Almost every organization in the North Side neighborhood met on the
second floor at some time over the decades. While the heaviest Bohemian settlement was farther
east near St. Wenceslaus and the Czecho Slovakian Association (CSPS) Hall on North Johnson, many
of the societies held their meetings in National Hall. It is known that "Trasti" met there in 1891,
"Slovanska Lipa" met there from 1891-1908, and "Zastit" met there between 1908-1915. This
was not the only meeting hall in the area. Others included Mohr's (Baker's) Hall at 401 East
Market, Griffel's Hall at th NE corner of Dodge and Fairchild, and Union Hall at 203 N. Linn.
National Hall is historically significant for both its commercial and its fraternal associations. It is
considered individually eligible and a key structure in any historic district including Linn Street.
PREPARED BY: Molly Myers Naumann, Consultant
ADDRESS: 167 W. Alta Vista, Ottumwa, IA 52501
AFFILIATION: Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission
ADDRESS: 401 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240
PHONE: (515) 682-2743
DATE: February 19416
PHONE: (319) 356-5243
s
op
Iowa Site Inventory
Office of Historic Preservation
Iowa Stale Historical Department
East 121h d Grand Avenue
Des Moines. Iowa 50319
Identification
s'a-'a- 13a3
Site Number
District Name North Side Commercial
Map Reference # 13-14
1. Site Name Slezak Hall
2. ViRage/Town/City Iowa City Township County -Johnson
3. Street Address 308 12,314 N. Linn and 302-304 E. Bloomington/ all 5, W 50 of 6 #13
4. Legal Location
ltwal:
range
senbn of k section
5. UTM Location: Zone easting northing ; Acreage
6. Owner(s)Name Holub, William J. (contract to) Skarda, Vladimir F., Marilyn
7. Owner(s) Address _
(Street address)
(CiIV)
Istale)
8. Use: Present Apartments Original hotel. hall
Description
9. Date of Construction 1875 ArchitecVBuilder Joseph Slezak
10. Building Type:
❑ single-family dwelling ❑ industrial ❑ other institutional ❑ religious
❑ multiple -family dwelling ❑ educational ❑ public ❑ agricultural
commercial
11. Merior Walls: ❑ clapboard ❑ stone gq brick ❑ board and batten ❑ shingles ❑ stucco
❑ other
12. Structural System: ❑wood frame with interlocking joints ❑wood frame with light members (balloon frame)
[3 masonry load -bearing walls ❑ iron frame ❑ steel frame with curtain walls ❑ reinforced concrete
❑ other
13. Condition: ff excellent ❑ good ❑ fair ❑ deteriorated
14. Integrity: ❑ original site ❑ moved —if so, when?
Notes on alterations, additions (with dates and architect, if known) and any other notable features of building and site:
#13Remodeled apartments 1937. Fire 2/8/1940 "Holub Apartments" Loss $2,800 (304 N. Linn)
15. Related Outbuildings and Properly: ❑ barn ❑ other farm structures ❑ carriage house ❑ garage ❑ privy
❑ other
16. Is the building endangered? ❑ no ❑ yes —if so, why?
17. Surroundings of the building: ❑ open land ❑ woodland ❑ scattered outbuildings ❑ densely built-up ❑ commercial
❑ industrial ❑ residential ❑ other
18. Map
I N
19. Photo
Roll__ frame A View
porch 1965
%553
see .1fC18
Signlflccmce (Indicate sources of information for all statements)
20. Architectural significance
',] a. Key structure/individually may qualify for the National Register
:1 b. Contributing structure +
❑ C. Not eligible/intrusion
#13 Italianate, ornate stone arches over windows, bracketts under eaves.
#14 Italianate, brackets undereaves, dentil molding on cornice and arched windows,
unusual roof line notable.
21. Historical Significance Themes) Commercial Italianate
❑ a. Key structure/individually may qualify for the National Register
Kb. Contributing structure 1
❑ c. Not eligibleAntrusion
#13 Used as Hotel, boarding rooms as part of Slezak Hall Anna, William J. Holub 1911.
#14 Housed grocery and saloon on first floor, meeting room with a stage second floor, and
hotel boarding rooms in rear. The laundromat portion housed feed for horses and
carriages were kept in the low building in the rear of the lot.
22. Sources (for primary and secondary sources, give complete facts of publication: author, title, place of publication, date, etc.):
Irving Weber Research by Pat Eckhardt
NSNPS Weber, Irving Vol. I, pp. 26-27
E.C. Ellis, "Certain Stylistic Trends in Architecture in Iowa City" (1947)
Chapman et al, Portrait & Biographical Record 6f Hohnson, Poweshiek and Iowa Counties,
lowa(Chicago, 1893) p. 140.
Aurner, History of Johnson County, Iowa 1836-1882,(Iowa City, 1883)
Prepared by Date
James E. Jacobsen
Address Telephone
For Office of Historic Preservation Use Only
Office Information Sources on this Property
❑ County Resource file
n Windshield Survey
� N,aional Register
❑ Grants -In -Aid:
❑ Determination of Eligibility
2. Subject Traces
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
❑ Review and Compliance Project:
❑ Other
❑ Other
❑ Other I
3. Photo Images _ 4 50 7
I
Iowa Site Inventory
Division of Historic Preservation
Iowa State Historical Department
26 E. Market St., Iowa City, Iowa 52240
5-1-4/6-13,13
Site Number 29-1349
Continuation Sheet
ORWE
a
"-PSI ctl 4t
w `-
Joseph F. Holub was born in Bohemia in 1867, came to the U.S. in 1868 with
his family. He was a clerk with Denecke & Yetter Dry Goods store until 1900
when he started his own business, including a grocery, hotel. A son William
(born 1892) assisted with the business.
(Aurner, History of Johnson County, Iowa (Cedar Rapids, Western Pub. Co., 1912)
p. 689-90).
Historical Background:
Joseph Slezak (1847-1912), born in Bohemia, came to the United States
in 1855, and to Iowa City in 1870. He opened a hotel that same year, adding
grocery in 1877. The National Hotel and Hall was recognized as being a local
Bohemian cultural center. The following Bohemian fraternal and community
organizations used the hall for their meetings; Trasti (c. 1892), Zastit
(1901-15), Slovanska Lipa (1892), Forum Palacky (1904-9), and Iowa City Lodge
#180 of ZCBJ (1914). For the most part these uses were discontinued with the
construction of the CSPS Hall to the east in 1906.
The commercial complex (hotel, hall and grocery) was operated by Slezak
at this site for more than twenty-two years and served farmers from Solon,
Swisher, and Shueyville (and that general area) who brought their produce to
the city for marketing. Slezak also served hospital visitors (this trade was
to continue through 1929 when University Hospital relocated to the west side
of the sity across the river. Slezak himself was a member of St. Mary Church
(the Bohemian Catholic Church was as yet not organized), Slovansk Lipa and
Lodge #75, CSPS.
The grocery was listed in city directories in 1878, 1891-98. It was
run by Frank V. Slezak in 1899, by Joe Slezak 1901-2, Joseph Holub 1904-20,
and Holub and Sons 1926-30.
The Farmer's Hotel is listed 1891-98, the National Hotel 1904, 1920, 1926,
National Hall in 1930. A saloon is listed here (Joseph Slezak) 1878-9, (Frank
V. Slezak) 1899-1900, and (Joseph Slezak) 1901-02. A local national guard head-
quarters was in the dance hall 1921-6.
The complex of buildings was later owned by Joseph Holub, William Holub,
and Val and Marilyn Skarda.
The earliest recorded commercial uses on this corner date from 1868 and
listed Frank Shimek's Shoes and Boots, and Joseph Shingmir's Guns and Pistols.
4%
-Oft
I Ir0, 0 A-a/O—/1�
(5/62)
c
i
1. STATE TO'.rr HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY
COUNTY Johnson INVENTORY
TOWN IO:rr City VICINM2nut",-Stern I .ir
STREET NO. 302 & 316 F-Rt Plon•niroton 2. NAME 302 G 31F East Bloomington &
3OR-314 No. Linn 30n 314 No. Linn
ORIGINAL OWNERJohn 21C7•^1 el JOS. 51C7.PV DATE OR PERIOD C. 187% 1883-88
ORIGINAL USE grocery stole rricj ]Intel STYLE
PRESENT OWNER Willi%m llolub ARCHITECT
PRESENT USE restaurrrtt, rpr rtm-_ntr rr.d BUILDER
WALL CONSTRUCTION brick 1`)Ind1y 3. FOR LIBRARY OF CONGRESS USE
NO. OF STORIES 3
A. NOTABLE FEATURES, HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND DESCRIPTION OPEN TO PUBLIC no
The oririnrl huildinr loc:tnd on thr corner of Linn rnd Bloomington,
mer•s1ITPS 40' x 80' rnd wr.n hvilt ty John 31ezrk about 1872. It housed a grocery
store rnd hotel. In rbout 18n3 or 1888, en nridition to the hotel was built by
Josenh Sleznkj a lime, irrecular iddition rt the north end, with residential and
stnhle frcilities.
The ton of tLe south frcrde is a wooden pediment in baroque curves. Below
this is v hervy, projectinc, woolen cornice with single, widely -spaced, windows
with three srshes. (The u-+per section is toArded up today.) Around the semi-
circulrr winder tons the rrised brick molding forms a rectangular panel. At the
top of the first story is Fi less extended cornice. The first story front has
been remodelled. Orininally a grocery store, now a restaurant occupies the first
floor front.
The second story cornice extends xlonc, the erst And west sides, upper story
windows rerertinr those of t'e south frcrde. On the west side was a second
entTrnce, lerdirn to •^,rrt,ncnt3, usinc cast iron elements and large glrss win -
doers. This �:s hcen Iriched ur, rrvi t!-e present entrance is to the north.
The liter, nort!-ern r Ilition is five hays wide, with a central entrance.
The FPcade is tonged try r 'inh cornice with a version of triglyph rnd metope
ornF^.ent, rnd single, widely -spaced brackets. 111 openincs are topped by very
plrstiq nressed tin rrchps with delicate inset floral ornament of an Eastlake
character, the kind of hooi used in the '80's. The cornice continues around the
buildin(7. 71ir.dows on the ::ides and hack are to-ped by a segmental arch with a
senrrate moldinc, fnnne-1 1-y !)rotrudincl prick.
The strrn section of t!u, irreculrrly shaped eddition served originally as
brrn. The curvinc• fertnres of the 1`rroque pc!-!iment is executed in brick and out-
lined in .rood. This Irter hu'lcling presently houses a 1Pundromat.
The significr•nt fcrtur�-s OF this ?)uildinr are: the unusual roof line, Pnd
the elnnnrted, widely -spiced, second -story win(lows of the early building.
5. PHYSICAL CONDITION OF STRUCTURE Endanger.d no Interior good E.t.ri.r good
I -A LA Aj bP-6AiAr
A PA Rrrn E NrS
ANr
r 1 FAST- RL.00 NI) N 41V N 57, _
N 6. OCATION MAP (PI—OP6 ..1) 7. PHOTOGRAPH
B. PUBLISHED SOURCES (A-O-r, Trrl., P"..) . NAME, ADDRESS AND TITLE OF RECORDER
INTERVIEWS, RECORDS, PHOTOS,'_TC. Professor Robert Alexander
Johnson Coamty Trrnsfer BhOks-1011, City School of Art
In -Fr City Directory Universityof Iowa
PurnCr„ Cl: rcncc °ry, L%•"•1 Inrn .^rri .s in IOIre Citylowe 52240
1JTytinsnr nn•n,tx T Tjir•}_ry. e3ar
r, rat 24tea, - P January 20, 1970
ni9s. L", or1: ..,.or , 1 rC3^ DATE OF RECORD
I'll
i
North Side Neighborhood Preservation Study
Historic Structure Inventory
i
address: 302-304 Bloomington
present use: commercial Pizza Palace
present owner: Holub/Cont: Skarda
3'ke No. 5'�-0/v-�323
block: 57
z
O
lot
Rti
Q
U
no. 1349
owner
E�
occupied:
z
w
A
date of construction: 1875
building type and material: 3 story brick
architectural style: Italianate
condition: excellent
importance to neighborhood: important independent of surrounding structures
notable features of building and site:
AML
This distinctive Italianate building not only has the typical
brackets under the eaves, dentil molding on the cornice and arched
windows, but is also notable for the unusual roof line both on this
building and on the adjoining Laundromat at 310 Bloomington.
6�
original owner:
original use: commercial - Slezak Hall
historic significance:
Slezak Hall housed a complex of uses including a grocery
and a saloon on the first floor, a meeting room with a stage on the
second floor and hotel and boarding rooms at the rear in what is
now the Holub Apartments on Linn. The present Laundromat housed feed
for horses and carriages were kept in the low building at the rear of
the lot.
sources: Sanborn 1888, 1892, 1899
Weber
i��
s]
Iowa Site Inventory
Office of Historic Preservation
Iowa State Historical Department
P"k East 12th 3 Grand Avenue
Des Moines. Iowa 50319
Identification
Site Number
District Name
Map Reference
1. Site Na rne_ ApaT"t bents
2. Villagenowocl; t !N ! 3 Township County JalnTson
3. Street Address
4. legal location
Urban: subdMsblecY panel b cel
RnsMp ural. towrang-4s¢yi e sMion 'a on of w anion
S. UTM Location: zone easting northing ,
G rxr�sld Ns�we
7. Owner(s) Address
151ree( address) (city) (Sister (zip)
8. Use: Present Original
Description
9. Dale of Construction ArchitecUguilder
10. guilding Type:
❑ single-family dwelling ❑ industrial ❑ other institutional ❑ religious
❑ multiple -family dwelling ❑ educational ❑ public ❑ agricultural
❑ commercial
11. Exterior Walls: ❑ clapboard ❑ stone ❑ brick ❑ board and batten ❑ shingles ❑ stucco
r 1 nther
12. Structural System: ❑wood frame with interlocking joints ❑wood frame with light members (balloon frame)
❑ masonry load -bearing walls ❑ iron frame ❑ steel frame with curtain walls ❑ reinforced concrete
r ❑other
13. Condition: ❑ excellent ❑ good ❑ fair ❑ deteriorated
14. Integrity: ❑ original site ❑ moved —if so, when?
Notes on alterations, additions (with dates and architect, if known) and any other notable features of building and site:
15. Related Outbuildings and Properly:
❑ other
16. Is the building endangerecif ❑ no
❑ barn ❑ other farm structures ❑ carriage house ❑ garage ❑ privy
❑ yes —if so, why?
17. Surroundings of the building: ❑ open land ❑ woodland ❑ scattered outbuildings ❑ densely built-up ❑ commercial
❑ industrial ❑ residential ❑ other
18. Map
19. Photo
Roll 1506 Frame 15 View
CPE41965
2]3-0228
Significcmce (indicate sources of information for all statements)
20. Architectutal significance
❑ a. Key structure/individually may qualify for the National Register
❑ b. Contributing structure
❑ c. Not eligible/intrusion
21. Historical Significance Themels)
❑ a. Key structure/individually may qualify for the National Register
❑ b. Contributing structure
❑ c. Not eligible/intrusion
22. Sources (for primary and secondary sources, give complete facts of publication: author, title, place of publication, date, etc.):
Prepared by Dme .
Address Telephone
For Office of Historic Preservation Use Only
Office Information Sources on this Property
❑ County Resource File
❑ Windshield Survey
❑ National Register
❑ Grants -In -Aid:
❑ Determination of Eligibility
1. Subject Traces
a. ---
b.
C.
d.
e.
❑ Review and Compliance Project:
❑ Other
❑ Other
❑ Other
3. Photo Images
w
District: North Side Commercial
Property Name:
Address: 308 East Bloomington
Iowa City, Iowa
Photographer: Vicki Miller
Date: July, 1981
View: SE
#13
North Side Neighborhood Preservation Study
Historic Structure Inventory block: 57
z
address: 310 Bloomington
present use: commercial -Laundromat
present owner: Holub/Cont: Skarda
lot
no. 1349
owner
occupied:
date of construction: 1875
building type and material: 1 1/2 story brick
architectural style: Italianate
condition: good
Importance to neighborhood: important independent of surrounding structures
notable features of building and site:
This building should be considered as part of Slezak Hall (302-304
Bloomington) . The style is distinctive and complements that building.
They were built as a complex.
original owner:
original use: Slezak Hall - stable and feed
historic significance:
Refer to the inventory sheet for 302-304 Bloomington.
sources: Sanborn 1888, 1892, 1899
Weber
z
W
r
r
r
Iowa Site Inventory Site Number SJ,-o /o - /3 a3
Division of Historic Preservation
Iowa State Historical Department
26 E. Market St., Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Continuation Sheet
Item Number(s)
Roll 14, Frame 7,
3!0 rj/,0inikgl0x
view Noetlk
Courtyard view from south (laundromat to right)
Roll K, Frame 6
View NW
Laundromat, former stable, view from southeast.
North Side Neighborhood Preservation Study S;4e- Na. 5� 0/o-/3a3
Historic Structure Inventory block: 57
z
lot U'
address: 310 Bloomington no. 1349
present use: commercial
-Laundrpmat owner
present owner: Holub/Copt: Skarda occupied: z
w
L]
H
date of construction; 1875
building type and material: 1 1/2 story brick
architectural style: Italianate
condition: good z
importance to neighborhood: important independent of surrounding structures U
notable features of building and site: w
M
x
This building should be considered as part of Slezak Hall (302-304 U
Bloomington) . The style is distinctive and complements that building. A
They were built as a complex.
original owner:
original use: Slezak Hall - stable and feed w
historic significance: z
4
Refer to the inventory sheet for 302-304 Bloomington. U
k,
z
0
M
U
H
rz
p
H
;C
sources: Sanborn 1888, 1892, 1899
Weber