The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWS 1 - City Park Pool Item: WS.1 PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: By: Juli Seydell-Johnson, Iowa City Parks & Recreation Director Andrew Caputo, Project Manager with Williams Architects Dannie Wilson, Recreation Consultant with BerryDunn r Laura Payne, Professor at University of Illinois Dept of Recreation & Park Resources` `s lir'n Frank Parisi, Managing Principal with Williams Architects - ....._ CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 Fast Washington Strcct Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org 6 ♦ �T e --� CITY PARK POOL CITY OF IOWA CITY PLANNING ``- - City Park Pool Conceptual Design Phase Presentation for the Parks & Recreation Commission and City Council 07 May 2024 WILLIAMS ARC H I T E C T S Agenda i� ;r Introduction Existing Conditions Review _-- _-- City Council Action Public Input Summary Design Concepts Open House No. 2 Survey Recommended Action Schedule / Next Steps Today's Goals Provide the Parks & Recreation Committee t< i and City Council with information to... _ 1 • Understand community input, the development of design concepts & budgets survey results; and recommendations for a new pool; q ; " �► In order for City Council to... _ AcA • Approve a new pool design concept; `# • Approve a project budget; • And direct any additional project considerations ...at the next City Council meeting. , CITY OF IOWA CITY Meet the Experts! PROJECT LEAD Your WILLIAMS Project NN k ARCHITECTS Team PUBLIC INPUT SURVEY Office of Recreation&Park Resources b B e r r y D u n n ][ College Dept.of Recreation,Sport and Tourism of Applied Health Sciences Counsilman-Hunsaker (Aquatic Engineers) • Hitchcock Design Group (Landscape Architects) IMEG (Civil & Structural Engineers) r # Frank Parisi Andrew Caputo COO/ Managing Principal Associate Principal/ Project Manager WILLIAMS WILLIAMS Meet the Experts! ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTS Your Project -,D , TeamLaura Payne Dannie Wilson Professor, Extension Specialist, Recreation Consultant x and Director 1n1BerryDunn Wicea Rm®fion&Pa& b errs F Dept.&Rm®,.,Spo andTmrtvn '�° CollegeofApplied HeaS 1a Project Goals 1. Provide community recreation experiences for a wide range of users. 2. Provide increased independent accessibility to all water experiences. 3. Provide shade in several areas of the deck and some in the water areas. 4. Provide design and operating efficiencies that support the City of Iowa City climate action goals. 5. Maximize efficiency of lifeguards. 6. Promote the vision "Every child learns how to swim." 7. Welcome users of all backgrounds with specific attention to facility entry patterns, shower / changing and restroom design. 8. Evaluate the potential merging of the outdoor park restrooms and year-round recreation programming space into the swimming pool facility. 9. Limit the construction area generally within the fence line/site plan of the current pool. CITYf PARK POOL CITY OF IOWA CITY PLANNING i Existing i Conditions Review Existing Conditions • Increasing annual water loss e • Deteriorated conditions found in pool basin AV • Concern for long term structural integrity of pool walls • Replacement of pool filtration, sanitation, and piping systems needed x • Outdated bathhouse in terms of safety, security, operational areas, and user amenities Recommendation Y t r T T • Williams Architects recommended complete replacement of City Park Pool with a new aquatic facility and bathhouse • Repair of pool not recommended o Repair project would essentially equate to full replacement project due to poor existing condition of pool walls, basin, and operating systems o Money spent on repairs would not replace all site infrastructure, pool piping, or pool - — equipment, leaving these items needing to _ be addressed through additional projects in S next 5-10 years • A new aquatic facility would give a " community a chance to weigh in on how project goals would be met and provide a structure that would last long into future �_? ,40k CITYf PARK ' II Rcr`rca�ion PLANNING A - 7 v IR `.9 w iwo� City Council � r Action J a Jc 7'y�1 e i City Council Action • Iowa City Council voted to approve the recommendation to replace City Park Pool and to begin the process of planning for a new pool r. CITYf PARK POOL WHAT DO YOU WANT CITY OrIMA CITY PLANNING TO SEE INANEW CITY PARK POOL DESIGN? A/" �/ L UPCOMING PUBLIC INPUT OPPORTUNITIES VISIONING EVENTS FRIDAY FOCUS GROUPS OCT 27 p.m. Sign to considered for Me , Mercer Park Aquatic Center one off several community "1141 focus groups that will provide 5:30-7:30 p.m. input into the design. Robert A. Lee Rec.Center Form available at: Public Input Learn about possible design ICGOV MPIN to apply:elements and give your Deadline to apply: feedback. 5 p.m., Monday,Oct. 30 Summary ,LEV i ICGOV.ORG/JUMPI" �r .1 .. CITY B PARK POOL ,T PLGNNING,�, i Engagement Tell us what you want to see in anew City Park Pool design at the Methods City Park Pool Planning •r •: _ Focus Group Participants ent To be considered,fill out an interest Memer form by October Win at 5:30-7:30. ICGOV.ORG/JUMPIN TWO-STEP PROCESS �1 f� CINNING,RRPCOL ICGOV.ORG/JUMPIN Step One � PIA""'Nsa�,.�," � • Open House No. 1 CITHPARK POOL err= .. PIAXNINf�..:IDui y�O L2 • Focus Groups P Step Two ((((� �� oil G • Conceptual Design44 • Survey Provide your input on a new City Park Pool design in our online survey. • Open House No. 2 Survey available at: ICGOV.ORG/JUMPIN • •• Deadline to submit:5 p.m.,November 34,2023 Idea Generation Session Open House No. 1 owl 1ML gg 1A �i 't I t l D U + F— LfJJES _ r," e m Nnr ' + __ _ • asar P � � NSi L k BlindMural Station Buckets .,a • • - F I AIeM C11Y1vAnK • ♦aa � 7 �Cosal — igfcr �6G r 060 w•o>-• wnaa c.cen.ao � • Maz« 1 m aa�e zona ne m�s,e rea, ne 1 - �••e ,'= Feedback Frames Idea Generation Session Focus Groups don Lj a �4pN� 2 BG G Straame J e q 9 4 +(\ O "This is the pool of my heart. " Focus Group Participant What We Heard How We Listened . . . • 1 . . . . lunity Input Touchpoints 251 137 Idea Generation Online Idea Representative Electronic Focus Participants Generation Focus Group Group Submissions Participants Submissions rJ6� Feedback Touchpoints What We Heard Who We Heard From . . . Participant Race I Ethnicity 69% 0%1% •White 7/ •Prefer Not to Answer 5% •Two or More Races \ Participant Ages 90 •Black or African American 350 •Asian 315 •Native Hawaiian or Other 300 Pacific Islander .30-49 years •American Indian or Alaska Native 250 `I'm 67 and I had fun!" .50+years Participant Gender 200 -0-5 years 1% 3% 157 -6-13 years 150 .Female 112 108 100 •Male 64 38% •Non-Binary or 50 Genderqueer 19 12 OJ58% •Prefer not to Answer 0 30-49 50+ 0-5 years 6-13 20-29 14-19 Prefer years years years years years not to Answer What We Learned Design Considerations Preserve Focus Avoid History Learn to Swim Overlapping Trees Multigenerational Functions Open Feel Safety What We Learned Top Amenities a` Shade Lap Lanes Diving Boards Expanded (both 50-meter & 25-yard) Kids Area (Small, semi-isolated, serves ages 3-8 years) Support Features Bubblers/Jets What We Learned Pool Entry & Accessibility crrNPaAxPaar est Desired Means of Entry !,! PLANNING Pay , C �0 r 3+r1'•1' I q �, Tom' � � _ - Sloped Entry • �•i • �_�� i �� PW Llll - I'I YIr. I'nnHn Wall u , 14 Railings Ar • �<s • Tra�uSyswm P San What We Learned Bathhouse Considerations • Non-gendered and gendered options • Family/Group spaces • Privacy • - - - - - F INNEENNEw- • Direct access top ool deck • Support features (hooks, seats, suit spinners) Multipurpose Room • Conditional support: accepted so long as pool amenities not sacrificed j" CITYf PARK POOL CITY OF IOWA CITY PLANNING PDOL Pnni Tk STAIR POOL \, STAIR F Sof � � a \ i Design Concepts Comparison Factors OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D FREE FORM ACTIVITY POOL THREE POOLS "L"SHAPED POOL ORIGINAL COST BATHER LOAD WATER SAVINGS SEPARATE PROGRAM AREAS ACCESSIBLE ZERO-DEPTH ENTRY CHILDREN ACTIVITY AREA 25 M LAP LANES 50 M LAP LANES 50 M LAP LANES AVAILABLE ALL DAY* LOW + HIGH DIVING BOARDS DECK SPACE FOR CHAIRS + SUNBATHING ADDITIONAL SHADE MINIMAL TREE IMPACT DESIGNED WITHIN CURRENT FENCE LINE NEW BATHHOUSE + MECHANICAL BUILDING Option A FREE FORM ACTIVITY POOL ATTACHED TO LAP POOL • (6) 50-meter lap lanes in 31/2 to 5-foot-deep water. Zero Depth entry through activity area °°R and integrated accessible stair entry. sT�R • Attached organically shaped zero-depth entry --- activity pool with depth up to 31/2 feet. Includes current channel and other bubbler/spray features. _ ST IR • Separate deep pool with low and high diving Sr° boards. Integrated accessible stair entry. / • Estimated 495,600 gallons of water volume (current City Park pool is 751,575 gallons). This is than the current pool. f= �cN • Maximum Bather Load: 975 Cost Estimate: $18.39 Million "°"'" Comparison Factors OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D FREE FORM ACTIVITY POOL THREE POOLS "L"SHAPED POOL ORIGINAL COST $18.39 M BATHER LOAD 975 WATER SAVINGS 34% Less 495,600 gallons SEPARATE PROGRAM AREAS ✓ ACCESSIBLE ZERO-DEPTH ENTRY ✓ CHILDREN ACTIVITY AREA ✓ 25 M LAP LANES 50 M LAP LANES 6 Lanes (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) 50 M LAP LANES AVAILABLE ALL DAY* ✓ 2-3 Lanes All Day* LOW + HIGH DIVING BOARDS ✓ DECK SPACE FOR CHAIRS + SUNBATHING ✓ ADDITIONAL SHADE ✓ MINIMAL TREE IMPACT ✓ DESIGNED WITHIN CURRENT FENCE LINE ✓ NEW BATHHOUSE + MECHANICAL BUILDING ✓ Option 6 I` 3 SEPARATE POOLS ZERO DEPTH • Separate pool with (6) 50-meter lap lanes in 31/2 to 5-foot-deep water. Integrated accessible sloped entry ramp & stair entry. • Separate zero-depth entry activity pool with x PO ° L_ depth up to 31/2 feet. Includes play structure I STAIR w_ and other bubbler/spray features. o, • Separate deep pool with low and high diving boards. Integrated accessible stair entry. Estimated 458,555 gallons of water volume (current City Park Pool is 751,575 gallons). This is 39% less water than the current pool. • Maximum bather load: 881 • Cost estimate: $17.94 Million low H. W1._tl Comparison Factors OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D FREE FORM ACTIVITY POOL THREE POOLS "L"SHAPED POOL ORIGINAL COST $18.39 M $17.94 M BATHER LOAD 975 881 WATER SAVINGS 34% Less 39% Less 495,600 gallons 458,555 gallons SEPARATE PROGRAM AREAS ✓ ✓ ACCESSIBLE ZERO-DEPTH ENTRY ✓ ✓ CHILDREN ACTIVITY AREA ✓ ✓ 25 M LAP LANES 50 M LAP LANES 6 Lanes 6 Lanes (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) 50 M LAP LANES AVAILABLE ALL DAY* ✓ ✓ 2-3 Lanes All Day* 2-3 Lanes All Day* LOW + HIGH DIVING BOARDS ✓ ✓ DECK SPACE FOR CHAIRS + SUNBATHING ✓ ✓ ADDITIONAL SHADE ✓ ✓ MINIMAL TREE IMPACT ✓ ✓ DESIGNED WITHIN CURRENT FENCE LINE ✓ ✓ NEW BATHHOUSE + MECHANICAL BUILDING ✓ ✓ i Option C _ "L" SHAPED COMBINED LAP & a ACTIVITY POOL ` oN o = • (6) 50-meter lap lanes in 31/2 to 5-foot-deep a g water. Zero Depth entry through activity area and integrated accessible stair entry. _ I— • Attached rectangular zero-depth entry activity pool with depth up to 31/2 feet. Includes play structure and other bubbler/spray features. • Separate deep pool with low and high diving boards. Integrated accessible stair entry. - • Estimated 443,700 gallons of water volumeSOL (current City Park Pool is 751,575 gallons). This a " is than the current pool. • Maximum Bather Load: 825 • Cost Estimate: $17.25 Million ° Comparison Factors OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D FREE FORM ACTIVITY POOL THREE POOLS "L"SHAPED POOL ORIGINAL COST $18.39 M $17.94 M $17.25 M BATHER LOAD 975 881 825 WATER SAVINGS 34% Less 39% Less 41% Less 495,600 gallons 458,555 gallons 443,700 gallons SEPARATE PROGRAM AREAS ✓ ✓ ✓ ACCESSIBLE ZERO-DEPTH ENTRY ✓ ✓ ✓ CHILDREN ACTIVITY AREA ✓ ✓ ✓ 25 M LAP LANES 50 M LAP LANES 6 Lanes 6 Lanes 6 Lanes (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) 50 M LAP LANES AVAILABLE ALL DAY* ✓ I/ I/ Lanes All Day* 2-3 Lanes All Day* 2-3 Lanes All Day* LOW + HIGH DIVING BOARDS ✓ ✓ ✓ DECK SPACE FOR CHAIRS + SUNBATHING ✓ ✓ ✓ ADDITIONAL SHADE ✓ ✓ ✓ MINIMAL TREE IMPACT ✓ ✓ ✓ DESIGNED WITHIN CURRENT FENCE LINE ✓ ✓ ✓ NEW BATHHOUSE + MECHANICAL BUILDING ✓ ✓ ✓ Option D REPLACE POOL AND WADING POOL - w THE SAME AS CURRENT POOL ` + " • (1) large pool with separate wading pool. (9) 50-meter lap lanes with (2) "wings" of `ST"'R shallow water. Lap Lane depth from 31/2 to 13 feet deep. Diving Area within the lap lane o 0 area. Lap Lanes available during limited "lap p swim" hours. Open for general swim the remainder of the day. • Integrated accessible stair entry at large pool. No zero-depth entry at large pool. C Small zero-depth entry at wading pool only. • Estimated 751,575 gallons of water volume. This is the same as the current pool. • Maximum Bather Load: 1,082 LOW HIGH • Cost Estimate: $19.56 Million ; 1t r 10 z� <o J Comparison Factors OPTION A OPTION B OPTION C OPTION D FREE FORM ACTIVITY POOL THREE POOLS "L"SHAPED POOL ORIGINAL COST $18.39 M $17.94 M $17.25 M $19.56 M BATHER LOAD 975 881 825 1,082 WATER SAVINGS 34% Less 39% Less 41% Less 751,572 gallons 495,600 gallons 458,555 gallons 443,700 gallons No water savings. SEPARATE PROGRAM AREAS ✓ ✓ It X ACCESSIBLE ZERO-DEPTH ENTRY ✓ ✓ ✓ X CHILDREN ACTIVITY AREA ✓ ✓ ✓ X 25 M LAP LANES X X Shared Open Swim 50 M LAP LANES 6 Lanes 6 Lanes 6 Lanes 8-9 Lanes (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) (All 6 for 3-4.5 hrs/day) (3-4.5 Hours per Day) 50 M LAP LANES AVAILABLE ALL DAY* 2-3 Lanes All Day* 2-3 Lanes All Day* 2-3 Lanes All Day* X LOW + HIGH DIVING BOARDS ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ DECK SPACE FOR CHAIRS + SUNBATHING ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ADDITIONAL SHADE ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ MINIMAL TREE IMPACT ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ DESIGNED WITHIN CURRENT FENCE LINE ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ NEW BATHHOUSE + MECHANICAL BUILDING ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ADMISSIONS SPRINKLER lk ff. LAPRt--SS LOCKERS, COMMUNITY WOMEN ECHMEN ROOM '"C NURSING 11, L AN JAR STOR WENDING Bathhouse Floor Plan R\ FIRSTAID GOADS, • Bathhouse design is preliminary and is subject to change. PbOLMANGI IL I • Bathhouse plan is the same with all four options. • Pool mechanical and filtration systems move to a separate building. • Bathhouse community room is 29'-4"x 25'-0" equaling 773 SF(size of N�TH small classroom). Ad o Z 4 iff CITYf PARK ' Il RPce anon PLANNING 4wey � kr r, x l�. I I Open f 4 - Open House No. 2 Summary • Attendees were primarily lap swimmers associated with the "Back to the Future" Group • Nearly all comments from this Open House were related to lap swimming • Participant feedback on the options ■ "I like them all!" ■ "You've done a good job — I'm happy with the options." r ■ One expressed that they appreciated 50-Meter ~' lanes in each option ■ The lack of symmetry was troublesome for more than one attendee CITYf PARK POOL WE LOO „ ' w �PI'NNINPaflKPoo1 K FORW �ti<.�..; . Palk CRY OF IOWA CITY ��" Iowa l moteden QCs Poad s9lAetlD,liked ro EDBgCKB AY P LA N N I N G mwe ode olo a Y FRID the Pro'').N/e invite(all ages acyv�o meet ENGLISH; minafor ttesnew CRYPalrrkpbns,PmgramsYOuroviden ntneeds ✓/nnwn.com/Prolsurvc�,.� yv�.• Hera to comPlete this ssu yse take d�few Mies ❑X s lew ro ESPAND- PyouP'py�ro4kaM h°�me plq�'Pro rsrryrt phone hp0'//tlnYurl.com/PWgurwY3P �... ❑ Oke er wlll dppear I arr me the pRSClla s Your You ro the survey n p�bile p Z:to a MANDq O k Rom�c iesnual and only 9rou Ral IM wlll http://g'nYUH.com/ 4nteo p. AsummA leO ecreate sU^reYare a ��appear i I THANK YOml�tolNe0@2 1 nftgh e 1�hpt,', city ty pec *BrOuo ❑ FRENCH-- hRP:/RinYUH. �..•. fi.1n, rb Pam,ay,,.,,-_ CO^r/poolsurley FR Cesk o!Robert A.Lee Reveation tkno:�e Center.A summary o!the results wlll be POaLd .n the Ory Pool Panning website when the results are ruCy,peau sera mesuw to GtyParkPoOlftJecwlowa� ty with uestlons. Thank you for PoviCing input fhmugh INS bHef wrzy FRENCH: ; THANK YOU! httP'//fire/url.rom/PoOISurvey-FR I VWf wRo of b coocVia \ "".11onVut\�pfnlYu� nretfeW't y� K>u or9 Survey star.P'Yo ao��cepw� p��9a�CaYY�mg lnP�t�9 .maok owWr M tNpNKYOU, Background, Purpose, and Methods • 30,544 households in Iowa City (American community survey,2022) • A stratified random sample of 6,000 residents asked to complete an online survey in late February to early March • The survey questions assessed interest in: ■ Four pool designs ■ Programs and activities ■ Demographics Ic- IF Survey Methods • Mailed a postcard with QR Code & link to the online survey , PIRKPOOL PIRNNING We baits arE WfesE4Uk Ey Fddee.NUM! Oaps!T Iesue wki Vee English Survey OR Coda Is Sled.Please bke Me survey N you M 1 yes • Unforeseen issue: English QR code was Cay Perk Ped.75 ee MsM Nl W replaced Ni a new.more nbdem Pod d"s to meet lona Cay residentsneeds(all ages.adrwN n .erld peter n s)We intoe you to poM bpd an lie prepo peel inoperable but the other 4 QR codes worked de pn proprems NM edbae Iq ie ew Qry Pe Pool Peke ekealew modes to emDee N55k9 rte wwbwas biteeer:rV sfe "gbrem vemeremese "wt kePmewbbesl meaubv.Urym Wy IYei plgbq a Iktl geg4Y eY iN rkne WmPN�.eam pegme SpRn b SUE,WEAN 1yY y.NbM Wrtyln nbpeeeigk ronv Enei 6pseel 10 M Mak Frmci • Second mailing sent 5 days later with a fixed � �MAN n .FR and usable code H In In H • Survey still available to all residents via a Y. � Wsine!.MQa �eqp inf.,arqe^PsIer p.d�e�.y. ewlbde et the hml desk d Rpped A.Lee Revaelbn CUaer and Nermr Perk Agu&b Cenler A sunmmy d Te nd esCulalyPsr*ieposPoo alyPM"h13.T eYo�p Idr, , ea�gi�dttii beefii e public access QR Code while 2 mailing was in production Psksatl ReaeaEm 0.ttb ■ No measurable effect on the response rate from this issue Survey Methods & Data Collection • The survey was available in English, Spanish, French, Mandarin, and Arabic ■ Responses: Spanish (N=24), French (N=9), Mandarin (N=3), Arabic (N=4) • The sample was stratified by race/ethnicity — people from diverse race/ethnic groups were oversampled • Stratification involved ensuring the random sample of 6,000 closely reflected the race/ethnicity of Iowa City households ■ Research indicates people from Latino/Hispanic and Black/African American groups are significantly less likely to complete mailed surveys • Thus, it is important to over-sample residents who identify as members of diverse racial/ethnic groups Survey Questions PLEASE COMPLETE THE SURVEY BY MARCH • Zip code and address (to ensure membership in CITY�PARK POOL stratified random sample) PLANNING • Pool use frequency ca�omaaaa�,. mw,w.wwr ma.,�aw.wb�P xown�bmdrwwrM Win.wd me+�ab alias a we..Ca Pa,Patl o�bra•...wabd.e.*,•b.�avm ma.d.rsbw • Days of week most likely to visit City Park Pool a�w4.wu�wvde Yw��ub.bwa'.dr �,�..�„ _Rww w.m,v..ebR.w.ww..•.ww<.b Pau.r.M.at _ anbmww • Activities done at the pooh �`""'� ' �°`� ' = MW. 9.^�YJUe�i„>w,w,tl,we OYPaLRtl MM aNI.�Y�MmMvc/imKse�{at Px�¢{vrvdwe s.'AYna.ffiIl1RM16YdRaNlk la WWM.atlzMb.mnsd nemdndw NMWa,M.nWw.C,Y Ileaesan COCabIbmPSLM®[Cvb RB SN am�eb u.aY wtlaww • Demographic questions `""'"" �` -.S,. -' • Age Pah ab Rm d.W _S.w.w, ■ Gender = _aaa�www ■ Race/ethnicity ■ Presence of children under 18 in households (yes/no) Preferences for Pool Designs A, 6, Cr & D Interest in Designs A, B, C & D • Question: How interested are you and members of your household in seeing Option B as the final design for the replacement of City - Park Pool? Please check the box that matches your interest level. • Measured on a 7-point scale where: 1 = Very Uninterested . BgYY<p%6.Y YCv q my<<pSM..n p�snnq"mgtM N!yy Y 2 = Uninterested UIN IM TMAv@b•9.MavinMmMrmwn W� . [ynyW ly 555q•stl Jvatl rAne(onn<C.y e.n van151515 P.T<I lle n JSY ka•Yn M R[vrml yv. . MYw.n�Wfpbtl Ml 3 = Somewhat Uninterested � E.511... 4 = Neither Uninterested or Interested: 5 = Somewhat Interested 6 = Interested 7 = Very Interested Preferences for Pool Designs A, 6, C, & D Ranking Designs A, B, C & D • Question: Please rank the four pool designs in order of your preference with your top preference noted with a "1'; your second preferences noted with a "2", third preference noted with a "T', and fourth preference noted with a "4". Please write the number into the box below that corresponds with your ranked preferences from 1 to 4. Above is a quick reference chart that shows facility features and amenities for all four pool designs (A-D). Option A - Free Form Activity Pool attached to Lap Pool Option B - 3 Separate Pools Option C - "L" Shaped Combined Lap & Activity Pool Option D - Replace Pool and Wading Pool the Same Design as the Current Pool • Options A — D were presented in random order to respondents to avoid response bias Response Rates and Sample Description • 6,000 addresses — 1,400 (moved or returned mail) = 4,600 ■ Response Rate = 9.8% response rate ■ N = 449 I • 95% Confidence means there is +/- 5% or less error in the responses 75+ Under18 60-75 1% 7% 11% Age & Gender • Mean Age = 38.22 ■ Standard Deviation = 15.16 19-29 40- 59 35% • Gender: 26% ■ 74.25% Female (common for household surveys) ■ 18.26% Male • 5.8% Prefer Not to Answer ■ Almost 1% Non-binary 30-39 20% ■Under18 ■19-29 ■30-39 ■40-59 ■60-75 ■75+ Race / Ethnicity Race / Ethnicity RACE / Ethnicity (Percentage) Iowa City Sample ■American Indian/Native ® � Alaskan ■Asian/Pacific Islander ■White III American ■Asian ■Caucasian/Wh ite ■Black/African American ■Hispanic/Latino ■Hispanic/Latino ■Other ■Prefer not to answer (American Community Survey,2023) Spatial Spread of Survey Responses Across Iowa City r l • • �• m yR G • aaa' • yea C r Iville • , •� • • • • • •� 010 Y� ••� �• • • •� Uni rsl s�•� • �•+ a♦ •� IOV12 City.... Municipal ^moi j Airport �, + •• .sa. W ioW k 215'. If.Pf]f]nntlrm Sfimpl=. �-Y R.p ,dertL cxtians • III _.. —_�. — Percentage of Households with Children Under 18 Demographics: Children Under 18 in the Household (Yes/ No) • More than two-thirds (i.e., 72%) of respondents indicated they do not have a child under the age of 18 living in the household ■ Yes ■ No Frequency of 4-5 times per 5+ times per week week 1% 7% Never Visiting 2-3 times per 19% week 10'/° City Park Pool • Almost half of the sample (47%) reported they visit the pool 1-3 times Once per per month week 16% • 19% are non-users of City Park Pool • 18% visit once per week • 10% visit 2-3 times per week • 8% visit 4+ times per week Pool Activities Engaged in by Respondents Frequency of Activity (Percentage) OPEN SWIM(N=313) • Swimming is the most common activity SUNBATHING(N=221) (31.6%) • Sunbathing (22.3%) and lap swimming LAP SWIMMING(N=174) (17.6%) are also frequent activities WADING POOL(N=97) • Fitness, non of the above, and water WATER WALKING(N=85) walking are engaged in less frequently NONE OF THE ABOVE(N=38) OTHER ACTIVITIES(N=35) WATER FITNESS CLASSES(N=22) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Interest Levels of Interest in Pool Design Each Pool Design N Y C d 9 • Most respondents indicated they were OC interested in seeing Pool Design A (84%) w 0 • There was also strong interest in Pool Design B (75%) a • Only 23% of residents were interested in seeing Pool Design D Pool Design A Pool Design B Pool Design C Pool Design D Pool Design ■Interested Neither Interested or Uninterested ■Uninterested Number of People Ranking Each Pool Design — 1st to 4th Place Pool Rankings: All Designs Pool Design ' Pool Design B • Nearly 50% of people ranked Pool Design A as their First o ao Choice Pool Design C • The second most popular design was Pool Design B with Pool Design D 22% ranking it first • Pool Design D was 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 Ogg 450 consistently ranked last (66%) Frequency of Ranking ■Ranked First Ranked Second ■Ranked Third ■Ranked Fourth Open - Ended Question Themes : Please Share Additional Views on City Park Pool • Survey open-ended feedback is aligned • City Park Pool means a lot to us/our with the first round of community input family ■ Open House Events in late Fall 2023 • Infrastructure needs and preferences: • Separate lap lanes (with lane lines) ■ Heated Pool 0 Zero Depth Entry ■ More Shade ■ Play features ■ Play and 50-meter lap lanes • Many respondents commented on their preference for Pool Design A • Family Friendly Play Areas ■ Play features and spaces for water play ■ Child friendly spaces ■ "A more inviting pool for all ages and activities" Pool Design A , Conclusions _ � x • Overall respondents indicated the highest interest in Pool Design A Poo L STAR • There is moderate interest in Pool Design B • There is much less interest in Pool Designsy C and D, with respondents being the least POOL STAIR interested in Pool Design D Po • Similar results were received from the open survey (N= 1,133) Open Survey Sample • A total of 1,133 valid responses from the "open" survey eHABLAS (available to the general public) ESPAROL? • The open survey was available in English, Spanish, HELLO! French, Mandarin, and Arabic ■ Responses: j8=0NJ0I/PI o Spanish (N=15) o French (N=7) go o Mandarin (N=2) o Arabic (N=2) 75+ Under 18 3% 1% 19- 29 Age & Gender 60- 75 14 °i° Open Sample • Mean Age = 44.24 ■ Standard Deviation = 14.79 • Gender: 30-39 28% • 71.2% Female (common for household surveys) ■ 24% Male 40-59 ■ 2.6% Prefer not to answer 39% ■ 1.8% Non-binary ■Under18 ■19 -29 ■30 -39 ■40 -59 ■60 -75 ■75+ Race / Ethnicity Race / Ethnicity RACE / Ethnicity (Percentage) Iowa City 0 Sample ■American Indian/Native Alaskan ■Asian/Pacific Islander ■Black/African American ■White ■Caucasian/White ■Asian ■Black/African American ■Hispanic/Latino ■Hispanic/Latino ■Other ■Prefer not to answer (American Community Survey,2023) Interest in Pool Design Interest Levels of Each Pool Design — N Open Survey Sample 0.N W W W d • Most respondents indicated they were interested in seeing Pool Design A (84%) a • There was also strong interest in Pool Design B (70%) • Only 35% of residents were interested in seeing Pool Design D Pool Design A Pool Design B Pool Design C Pool Design D Pool Design ■Interested Neither Interested or Uninterested ■Uninterested Pool Design A , Conclusions : Both Samples x (Open and Stratified Random Sample) POOL PCOM v STAIR ' sq, • Overall respondents indicated the highest interest in Pool Design A • There is moderate interest in Pool Design B • There is much less interest in Pool Designs C and D, with respondents being the least interested in Pool Design D - 0 CITYf PARK POOL CITY OF IOWA CITY PLANNING ♦ a Recommended Action ti t. Option A is Recommended FREE FORM ACTIVITY POOL ATTACHED TO LAP POOL • (6) 50-meter lap lanes in 31/2 to 5-foot-deep 1)o water. Zero Depth entry through activity area STAR TA'R and integrated accessible stair entry. Attached organically shaped zero-depth entry activity pool with depth up to 31/2 feet. Includes current channel and other bubbler/spray I Po L features. Separate deep pool with low and high diving • boards. Integrated accessible stair entry. • Estimated 495,600 gallons of water volume (current City Park pool is 751,575 gallons). This is 140/b less wat, than the current pool r' • Maximum Bather Load: 975 Noa,H • Cost Estimate: $18.39 Million ear.. Option 6 =- Considerations 3 SEPARATE POOLS ZERO DEPTH , • Separate pool with (6) 50-meter lap lanes in 31/2 to 5-foot-deep water. Integrated accessible sloped entry ramp & stair entry. x Pool �= STA �- • Separate zero-depth entry activity pool with STAIR depth up to 31/2 feet. Includes play structure and other bubbler/spray features. • Separate deep pool with low and high diving — boards. Integrated accessible stair entry. • Estimated 458,555 gallons of water volume (current City Park Pool is 751,575 gallons). This is than the current pool. ° • Maximum bather load: 881 IOW HI • Cost estimate: $17.94 Million W1._tl e Additional Considerations =s is 1. Include (2) additional 50-Meter lap lanes: " • Revise from (6) to (8) 50-Meter lanes • Adds $850,000, 75,097 gallons of water, and expands fence line 14 feet to the East which may impact trees and playground. Will require additional lifeguards. 2. 25-Yard lane considerations: • All options have a rope halfway in 50-Meter pool to provide 25-Meter lanes _ y • Enlarge deep hopper to (4) 25-Yard lanes • $ine0,000, 2,379 gallons of water, fits within fence 3. If cost saving are desired: • Exchange current channel for play feature f- = • Fewer lap lanes • Revise layout �_ CITYf PARK ' Il Rpce ation PLANNING A � nr, Woo ere � 1 j el p Wom Ao 10 rr �r r 1 y TC Schedulee Next Steps ��; ,! Next Steps COUNCIL APPROVAL MAY • . DESIGN JUNE 2024- JAN. 2025 • Schematic Design = . • Design Development =_ • Construction Documents • Permitting ' ` BIDDING r.;. • Bid` • NTRACTS FEB. • •Documents Issued to Potential Bidders Y • Pre-Bid Meeting & RFI Responses • Bids Received & Meetings with Potentially Low Bidders • Bid Award Recommendations • Owner/ Contractor Contract w CONSTRUCTION APRIL 2025 • GRAND OPENING MAY 2026 CITYf PARK POOL .�.�• a �. �Y _ CITY OF IOWA CITY P LA N N I N G ' F Thank You ' lip Officeof Recreation&ParkResources WILLIAMS b BerryDunn Dept-of Recreation,Sport and Tourism College of Applied Health Sciences ` A R C H I T E C T S PRESENTATION CONCLUDED CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org