HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-05-21 Bd Comm minutes Item Number: 4.a.
CITY OF OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
May 21, 2024
Ad Hoc Truth & Reconciliation Commission: April 4
Attachments: Ad Hoc Truth & Reconciliation Commission: April 4
April 4, 2024
Approved Ad Hoc Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Minutes
The Assembly Room,Iowa City Senior Center
Commissioners present: Amos Kiche, Cliff Johnson, Chastity Dillard,Lauren Merritt, Wangui
Gathua.
Commissioners on Zoom: Chad Simmons.
Commissioners not present: Louis Tassinary.
Staff present: Redmond Jones, Stefanie Bowers.
Recommendation to City Council: No.
Meeting called to order: Approximately: 7:15 PM.
Reading of Land Acknowledgement: Merritt read the Land Acknowledgements.
Debrief from Fact-Finding and Truth-Telling Events: Commissioner Johnsons shared his
thoughts on the truth-telling events, stating he thought the event(s) went well and there was growth
with the work that was done. Johnson also mentioned the idea of expanding these events into the
community to get others involved. Commissioner Kiche shared that he learned a lot from those
who participated in the events. Kiche was able to learn more about what goes on in the community
including how small business owners are affected and how systems (school system, legal system)
have failed individuals. Kiche suggested vetting people who will be speaking at truth-telling events
with more detail and communication to avoid surprises during the events. Kiche also suggested
sticking to guidelines on how the events should operate.
Commissioner Merritt agreed on the idea of a vetting process for the purpose of safety and
productivity in future events. Merritt also shared that there is potential to do more with these events
in the future. Commissioner Simmons spoke about the positive aspects of the events, including the
process of events (fact finding, truth telling, and healing circles). Simmons shared that the event
was not consistent with the model discussed regarding how the events would operate. Simmons
also shared that there is a need for better understanding of the systems (police, education,housing)
that the commission is working to fix to come up with solutions they can present to the city to
bring about improvements for the community. Merritt suggested implementing time to process
each truth-telling and putting aside additional time to brainstorm options for solutions. Johnson
recommended more advertisement to get more people involved. Commissioner Gathua suggested
implementing a stricter time limit where people stop speaking once the time is up (like what is
done in city meetings). Gathua also suggested being better prepared and tentative to any rising
tension during the events.
1
Commissioner Dillard shared the need for community involvement and for the commission to go to
community members and share what they have learned to help the community. Dillard shared
strengths from the meeting including the process, mobile-crisis partners, and healing circles.
Dillard also suggested providing more healing circles for the community and a vetting process for
future truth-tellers. Dillard mentioned the need for the commission to present as a united front
centered around the message of racial injustice. Facilitator Dr. Larry Schooler acknowledged the
work the commission has done and shared he agrees with the need for separate time to absorb the
stories told at each event.
Phase 2: Budget Update,Request for Additional Funds from the City Council,Next Steps &
Follow-up: Johnson suggested reaching out to community members through churches to get more
involvement at truth-telling events. Dillard revisited the commissioners north star framing question
that represents the commission's guiding vision. Dillard suggested taking what the commission has
learned, along with the model of the north star framing question and using it to reconnect with the
community and gather data/information to use for the recommendation they will present to the
council. Simmons asked what the overall message is that the commission is intending to deliver to
the council on April 16''. Dillard answered that the commission will share that there is still work to
be done. Simmons followed up by asking if the commission does not receive funding will it stop
the work they are currently doing. Dillard answered that if the city wants the commission to do the
work that they have asked them to do then the commission will need the money to move forward.
Johnson agreed that The City needs to be held accountable for what they set out to achieve with
this commission. Johnson also mentioned the possibility of sponsorships for funding.
Commissioners discussed the importance of city involvement and what the future of the
commission would look like without it.
Dillard then brought up the need for increased community support. A solution presented was
providing more healing circles to the community which would then lead to people who may be
interested in the commission work. Merritt suggested an advertising budget. Dillard emphasized
the importance of word of mouth to get community members involved. Johnson suggested a digital
billboard advertising. Dillard brought up the upcoming April 10 meeting with council and
proposed moving the meeting back to give more time to provide an itemized list of what the
proposed increase budget would be used for. Facilitator Annie Tucker brought up the importance
of the April 16'' meeting regarding the facilitation team that reports to council. Schooler asked for
clarification on what the city believes to be the commissions obligations under the contract relative
to the presentation planned for April 16t'. Redmond Jones clarified that the contract speaks to a
joint effort to put together a closing of the activities and recommendations that the facilitators have
brought to the commission. Dillard stated the need for the commission to present on progress on
April 16'' and to then schedule an additional meeting where budget and funding is discussed in
detail. Schooler clarified that the facilitators' role is to both report on the TRC's progress and to
provide a set of recommendations to allow the TRC to continue once their contract with the
facilitators ends. Simmons shared that he does not think it is a good idea for the commission to go
to the April 16'' meeting without a full presentation including budget. Simmons shared the political
nature of the meeting suggests what the commission is bringing to the meeting will benefit the city
rather than simply updating them on progress. Simmons suggested to go to the city and ask to
move back the date. Simmons agreed to support whatever final decision is made by the
commission.
2
The commission had to consider contractual obligations regarding the date of the meeting with
council and information presented by Jones resulting in a final decision to present a progress report
and highlights of their plans moving forward with a promise of additional budget information in
May. Commissioners discussed who would oversee giving the presentation to the council at the
April 16t' meeting. It was decided Simmons and Merritt will present to the City Council.
Announcements of Commissioners: None.
Announcements of Staff: Jones stated there will be a budget report available at a future date.
The meeting adjourned at 9:52 PM.
The full meeting video can be viewed at this link.
3
AD HOC TRUTH&RECONCILIATION CONEWSSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
YEAR 2024
eetin Date
TERM 1/4 1/25 2/1 2/15 3/7 3/14 3/18 3/20 3/21 4/4 4/18 5/2 5/16 6/6 6/20
NAME EXP.
Dillard 12/31/24 Z P P P P P P P P P
Gathna 12/31/24 P P P P A P P P P P
Kiche 12/31/24 - - - P P P P P P P
Johnson 12/31/24 A P P P P P P P P P
t
12/31/2412/31/24 P Z P P Z P P P P P
12/31/24 Z Z Z A A A A P P R
12/31/24 P P P P P P P A P Z
12/31/24 P A P P P P P P P A
P= Present in person
A =Absent
Z= Zoom
Item Number: 4.b.
CITY OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
May 21, 2024
Charter Review Commission: April 9
Attachments: Charter Review Commission: April 9
MINUTES FINAL/APPROVED
CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION
APRIL 9, 2024—5:30 P.M.
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL
Members Present: John Balmer, Susan Craig, John Death, Gerene Denning, Mackenzie
DeRoo, Matt Hayek, Molly Kucera, Bijou Maliabo, Jennifer Patel
Staff Present: City Attorney Goers, Deputy Clerk Platz
(Videos of the meetings are available at citychannel4.com typically within 48 hours)
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council
action):
None
1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL:
Chair Balmer called the meeting toorder and welcomed everyone.
2. MOTION TO ADOPT DRAFT MINUTES AS PRESENTED OR AMENDED
Balmer thanked the City Clerk's office for the thoroughness of the minutes.
Patel moved to approve the April 1, 2024, draft minutes as presented, seconded by
Kuchera. Motion carried 9-0.
3. MOTION TO ACCEPT CORRESPONDENCE
Balmer suggested a process of accepting correspondence where the commission would
accept correspondence at the meetings as it is received and review the correspondence as
it correlates to the section of the Charter being reviewed. Motion by Deeth to accept
correspondence from Larry Baker, seconded by DeRoo.
Commissioner Hayek asked if there was a way to streamline the process for receiving
correspondence. City Attorney Goers explained that typically correspondence would be
received in connection with an item on the agenda similar to City Council, noting that all
correspondence received by the commission will be directly related to the City Charter.
Goers and Grace thought it would be best to accept as it comes in as there could be some
confusion having staff go backwards to match up the correspondence to the Article of the
Charter being discussed. Goers stated an email for the Commission had been established
and the process to disseminate to the Commission was still being worked through. Motion
carried 9-0.
4. DISCUSS PROCESS FOR THE REVIEW OF THE CITY CHARTER
Balmer proposed a process of review starting with a full review of the Charter to benefit the
Commission and the public. During the review the Commission will make note of items
deemed as important or needing further review along with items that the Commission has
received correspondence on will be noted for further discussion at a later date.
Along with the distribution and dissemination of meeting information to the public, the
Commission would like to encourage public input and how to communicate with the
Commission. Balmer suggested having a public comment period for 15 minutes at the end
Charter Review Commission
April 9,2024
Page 2
of each meeting the allow for public input. Goers provided additional information on open
meetings laws and why the Commission cannot have a discussion with the person giving
public comment when proper notice has not been given. Commissioners also discussed
holding public hearings at a later date prior to approving any recommended changes. Vice
Chair Kucera noted that allowing public comment at the end of the meeting allows the
Commission to reflect on the comments and process the information. The commission
agreed with proposed review process and meeting structure.
5. INITIAL REVIEW OF CITY CHARTER:
Balmer introduced discussion and laid process for the initial review. Kucera noted the Model
City Charter included in the April gth agenda packet and recommended using it as a
reference tool with tips and legal verbiage to help with the review of the City Charter.
Commissioners provided individual comments on ways to use the model during the review
process.
Preamble:
Commissioner Craig asked for the history on inclusion of the language for#2. "The provision
of service relating to the health, safety, and welfare of its residents in a fair, equitable and
efficient manner, " noting that it felt limiting to single out health , safety, and welfare.
Attorney Goers stated the language mirrors that state statue regarding what cities are
entitled to do. Commissioner Denning recommended using some of the Model Charter's
language and add to preamble. Balmer stated that Denning could provide recommended
language to the Commission to review. Kucera also agreed that the verbiage in the example
the Model Charter uses is solid and quoted the following: "By this action, we secure the
benefits of home rule and affirm the values of representative democracy, professional
management, strong political leadership, public engagement, diversity and inclusiveness
and regional cooperation." Denning agreed with Kucera and noted that it could be an
addition to what is already in the Preamble, in addition Denning suggested adding the
following phrase: "a responsibility for environmental stewardship."
Definitions:
Commissioner Deeth noted there were several references to qualified electors and the
distinction between qualified and eligible has faded since the election law took effect in 2008
and suggested cleaning up where qualified is used. Commissioners discussed adjustments
or removal of the language. Kucera noted the commission will review these references as
the review process moves forward.
Article I. Powers of the City:
Denning asked for clarification on Section 1.03 Savings Clause. Goers stated that if any
part of the Charter is challenged the entire Charter would not be removed, only the part
being challenged would be severed off and the rest would remain in effect. Hayek asks
Goers if he was aware of any changes in State Code or potential changes that could require
the Commission to make changes to the City Charter. Goers noted there were a few items
that have come up that may not be required but the Commission should consider and will
bring to the next meeting. Denning mentioned there was language that could enhance
Section 1.01 Powers Of The City and make it stronger.
Article II. City Council:
Balmer noted this would be a section that would need further discussion and gave a brief
history on the introduction of districts in Iowa City and the changes made from a five person
Charter Review Commission
April 9,2024
Page 3
At-Large council to a seven member, four At-Large and three district member council.
Balmer noted it was hybrid and a compromise at the time 50 years ago when it was created.
Deeth advised the current primary process is challenging to explain to the public.
Commissioner DeRoo asked for background history on the three districts and how they're
evaluated. Goers stated districts have been modified to include annexed areas, there is also
a provision that states district must be as close as possible to being equal in population after
each Census . Death gave additional information about district exceptions at the Auditor's
Office and the reprecincting process. Commissioner Patel had questions on annexing and if
that is regulated by City Charter. Goers advised state law regulates annexation but that the
Commission could add language to the Charter that speaks to annexation as long as it
doesn't counter state law. Death provided examples of districting issues with some
districting law. Goers also provided additional information on the known issues Owl Song
Lane.
Denning referenced the Model Charters terms and districts noting Iowa City is very similar
except for how the district representatives are elected questioning if the City should go from
a Primary election to Rank Choice voting process. Commissioners discussed Rank Choice
voting and current proposed legislation. DeRoo added that there will be interest in direct
election of the Mayor, and the previous Charter Review Commission had extensive
discussion regarding compensation so that lower socioeconomic classes could participate in
local government but not so high that people would pursue it as a full time occupation and
how that could be adjusted.
Craig mentioned thoughts on increasing the number of council members to increase
representation may come up as an issue. Kucera stated that the Commission should spend
time looking at the ideas in the model documents so that when they review in detail so they
are ready and prepared for those discussions and can ask the City Attorney any questions
and move forward with that agenda item.
Craig noted in Section 2.12 there is no mention of the Library Director and Airport Manager
and differences of function and oversite by their Boards and though it should be noted in B
and C. Hayek noted reviewing inconsistencies or if there is any confusion in the last
sentence of 2.12(B) and all of 2.12(C) in terms of"expressing views" and "interfering".
III. Nominations:
Balmer noted this may come up in the discussion of districts. Deeth mentioned the timing
and scheduling of primary elections and general elections. Commissioners discussed
elections, special elections and city/school elections and the differences.
IV. City Manager:
Kucera asked Goers if he had any feedback to give to the commission on this item. Goers
advised that the Commissioners will lead this process, but he will help facilitate and provide
feedback as needed. Craig also noted that the Airport and Library should be addressed in
Section 4.04(A)(5)also. Craig asked if the state law prohibits, the City Manager from doing
anything. Goers stated that Commissioners can include items in the Charter as long as it
doesn't interfere with State or Federal law.
Charter Review Commission
April 9,2024
Page 4
V. Board Commission and Committees
Commissioners had questions and discussed gender balance and the State Code change
effective July 1, 2024. Goers provided additional information noting that gender balance
may be considered but not required.
VI. Campaign Contributions and Expenses
Deeth noted the if there was a violation that would have changed the limit from $50 to $100.
Goers noted he was familiar of the change. Commissioners discussed the maximum
contribution limits and changes along with the state laws on funding and spending. Denning
mentioned discussions about adding sections to specify how the funds can be used.
VII. Initiative and Referendum
Deeth brought up issues with past verbiage on referendums regarding confusion for a
simple yes/no vote, and the inability of election poll workers to provide any direction or
answer questions for confused voters. Goers provided information and advised the
language is drafted sustainably the same as the petition. Death pointed out Section
7.01(B)O)and asked if that was added in the 90's and referenced the Walmart rezoning.
Goers advised Planning and Zoning matters are regulated by the state and carving out a
separate process through an initiative would violate state law. Deeth also noted Section
7.05(A) stating there my be issues with the 30 day deadline before a scheduled election for
the Council to take action to approve something if the elections are being combined on even
years. Hayek stated it would be helpful to know if there have been any changes in state or
federal law that impact the deadlines and processes in the City Charter. Goers asked for
clarification as to when the Commission would like information distributed such as at the
next meeting after the request is made or as those sections come up for discussion. After
Commission discussion, Goers will provide information in the meeting packet of the
scheduled meeting that has the item on for discussion.
VIII. Charter Amendments and Review
Balmer asked for clarification on Section 8.01(A)and the use of"special" city election.
Deeth explained the difference between even and odd year elections according to the
Auditor's office. Goers noted that special implies that it is not at the general election.
Commissioners had further discussions about "Special City Elections" vs. "General"
"Special" and "City/School elections". The Commission asked Goers to look into it.
6. TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE
Commission discussed topics to discuss at the April 251 meeting and agreed to discuss the
Preamble and Article I. DeRoo and Craig will be unable to attend April 251 meeting. Goers
stated they are welcome to submit comments similar to the public. The Commission
discussed strategy to keep the review process moving, how to promote public participation
and engage the media. Balmer mentioned getting good media coverage to help explain
what the board is doing with the ten-year review. DeRoo mentioned seeking partnership
with non-profits that could help spread the word, for example League Of Women Voters, etc.
Craig noted that City Council could make announcements at their meetings. Denning
mentioned reaching trusted partners in different communities, especially non-English
speaking communities. Commissioner Maliabo provided some insight to the best way to
reach the immigrant population via social media.
Charter Review Commission
April 9, 2024
Page 5
Balmer noted that even though the Commission is seeking comments from community
members and elected officials, they are tasked with giving the City Charter an independent
review and to keep an open mind.
Commission also discussed May meeting schedule currently set for May 14' and May 231
Denning advised that she will be unable to attend the meetings in May. The Commission
will discuss the summer schedule at the April 25" meeting.
7. ADJOURNMENT:
Patel moved to adjourn the meeting at 6:44 P.M., seconded by Maliabo. Motion
carried 9-0.
Charter Review Commission
ApnI9,2024
Page 6
Charter Review Commission-2024
ATTENDANCE RECORD
TERM > a
0 0
NAME EXP. m
N N
A A
John Balmer 411!25 X X
Susan Craig 411!25 X X
John Death 411/25 X X
Gerona Denning 411/25 X X
Mackenzie DeRoo 4!1125 X X
Matt Hayek 411125 X X
Molly Kucera 411125 X X
Bijou Maliabo 411!25 X X
Jennifer Patel 411125 X X
Kev:
X = Present
O = Absent
OJE=Absent/Excused
NM=No meeting
---=Not a member
Item Number: 4.c.
CITY OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
May 21, 2024
Climate Action Commission: April 1
Attachments: Climate Action Commission: April 1
MINUTES FINAL
IOWA CITY CLIMATE ACTION COMMISSION
APRIL 1 , 2024 -3:30 PM — FORMAL MEETING
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michal Eynon-Lynch, John Fraser, Jamie Gade, Ben Grimm, Zach
Haralson, Wim Murray, Brinda Shetty, Michelle Sillman, Angie
Smith, Gabriel Sturdevant
MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Anderson
STAFF PRESENT: Sarah Walz, Daniel Bissell, Sarah Gardner, Diane Platte
OTHERS PRESENT: Quin Kitterman,Alex Viner, Abdullah Elbuytari
CALL TO ORDER:
Sturdevant called the meeting to order.
APPROVAL OF MARCH 4, 2024 MINUTES:
Fraser moved to approve the minutes from March 4, 2024. Shetty seconded the motion, a vote
was taken, and the motion passed 9-0.
PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Action Items from last meeting (Staff):
• Staff contacted Sarah Walz, transportation planner, who agreed to attend the April
meeting as a follow up to her presentation in March
Air Quality Council Work Session:
• Staff have requested clarification as to how City Council would like the Commission to
engage with the Proctor & Gamble rezoning request, whether by participation in a future
work session or other means, and will update the Commission as more is learned
Upcoming Events:
• Earth Expo (AmeriCorps, April 6) -will showcase a secondhand fashion show
• Neighborhood Energy Blitz (April 20) - volunteers are needed
Angie Smith joined the meeting at 3:36.
• Commissioners' Other Events in the Community:
C) Climate Solutions Surround Us with UI Office of Sustainability (April 22) - Dr.
Heidi Roop is presenting at 3pm and 7pm
C) Repair Cafe at Environmental Education Center (April 21) - bring items in need of
repair
Climate Action Commission
April 12024
Page 2 of 5
UNFINISHED/ONGOING BUSINESS:
Discussion of Bicycle Master Plan
• Sarah Walz from Johnson County MPO continued the discussion on the Bicycle Master
Plan and addressed commissioners' questions. Walz described projects to be completed
this year and noted completion of the Highway 6 Trail is expected in a couple years.
• Reconstruction of Burlington St. bridge will include major improvements to bicycle, bus,
pedestrian, and vehicular traffic.
• Projects are planned 5 years out through the Capital Improvements Program. Upcoming
projects include improvement of Highway 6 bridge and improvement of the Riverside
Dr/Highway 6 intersection
• Nearly all the projects from the 2017 Bicycle Master Plan are complete. Complete
Streets federal funds will enable new projects and public input will be sought for those.
• Budgets: $150k each year is allocated for bicycle projects. It is used for bike lane striping
and signage as well as other construction or reconstruction projects.
• E-bike programs would not fall under the responsibility of MPO; those would come
through City Council. Gardner added that a-bikes rebates were previously considered by
the Climate Action and Outreach Division as a potential use of ARPA funding but
deemed them a lower priority due to unresolved equity questions. She also noted e-
bikes are to be included in the regional climate action plan.
• Eynon-Lynch asked for clarification between a bikeway and a side path. Walz explained
that bikeways are low-volume streets with no designated bike lanes; these are marked
with signage and monitored for needed improvements. Side paths are wide sidewalks
where driveways and curb cuts are limited.
• Eynon-Lynch asked how a-bikes fit on trails with pedestrians and kids. Walz noted that it
is an ongoing process to work out how everyone shares those spaces.
• Fraser asked what's the best message commissioners can convey. Walz reported that
people think it is not safe to walk in Iowa City, whereas really our city is rich with
sidewalks. Highway 1 and Highway 6 are examples of areas where pedestrian facilities
could be improved. Walz noted that getting cyclists comfortable at intersections
especially is key.
• Smith asked about plans for protected bike lanes. Walz noted that such lanes work best
in locations with long blocks and few curb cuts, such as protected bike lanes in Madison
Wisconsin. Driveways pose a challenge. Keeping the bike lanes clean is another
challenge.
• Smith asked about the adoption of a Complete Streets policy. Walz noted that the
reconstruction of American Legion Road reflected the City's adoption of Complete
Streets policy.
• Sturdevant asked for clarification on buffered bike lanes. Bike lanes have a single line.
Buffered bike lanes have double lines. Protected bike lanes have a barrier within the
buffer.
• Murry asked if residents are responsible for clearing side paths. Walz said the City
removes snow in some but not all areas.
• Fraser noted that"Bike Lane Ends" signs pose a challenge to less-confident cyclists.
• Gardner shared that a bus bike rack will be affixed to Chauncy ramp as part of the City's
Bike to Work Week activities.
• Walz noted that the Bike Library and Bike Iowa City are great ways to get people out and
comfortable on bikes.
2
Climate Action Commission
April 12024
Page 3 of 5
• Sturdevant asked about snow removal from bike trails and side paths. Walz explained
that the commuter parts of bike trails are plowed by Iowa City. Different communities in
Johnson County may have different policies. Sturdevant asked if there is a way to find
out which trails are cleared. Walz said MPO publishes a map of trails that are cleared.
• Gade added that she used the ICGovExpress app to report glass in the bike lane and it
was fixed promptly.
• Fraser asked if there are helmet requirements for cyclists. Walz noted there are not.
Fraser suggested that giving out free helmets may be a good way to encourage cycling
and less expensive than giving out free bikes.
Climate Pollution Reduction Grant
• Gardner summarized the ongoing work:
o The Priority Climate Action Plan was submitted to the EPA March 1. Iowa City
and Cedar Rapids submitted a coalition grant for methane capture systems.
ECICOG was charged with submitting a grant application to further energy
efficiency projects, including EV charging at multi-family housing. Stage 1 of a 4-
year process is done.
o Stage 2 involves developing a Comprehensive Climate Action Plan. An Equitable
Engagement Toolkit is in development in collaboration with University of Iowa
researchers to make sure rural and small communities and Environmental
Justice communities have their priorities included.
• Gardner asked commissioners for suggestions on defining good green jobs and
workforce development related to the green economy.
• Bureau of Labor Statistics defines green jobs as those that help contribute to the green
economy (producing wind turbines, solar panels, bicycles, etc.) or those that make
processes for existing businesses more environmentally friendly (waste reduction,
conservation, etc.). Gardner asked commissioners to consider whether that definition is
adequate and whether those two halves should be weighted equally.
• Gade asked if this would include an assessment of the current workforce makeup.
• Fraser noted that there is a danger of defining green jobs too narrowly: ideally there are
many jobs that would include a green component.
• Sillman proposed she would like to have time to look at definitions and then discuss it.
• Gardner offered to email out the Bureau of Labor Statistics definition and plan a
discussion for the next meeting.
Visioning indicators of success in climate action
• Gardner asked if any additional metrics should be added to the list.
• Haralson offered that distributed generation and storage can be measured by total
capacity and cumulative ongoing total.
• Gardner noted that the City has recently selected the Fare Free pilot as an example for
reporting meaningful metrics, thinking about what the metrics can and can't tell us and
what alternatives might be worth considering.
• Commissioners were asked to think about how frequently numbers should be reported,
and how would numbers be used.
NEW BUSINESS:
Iowa City/UI Pledge Project Recommendations
• University of Iowa students Quin Kitterman, Alex Viner, and Abdulla Elbuytari have been
3
Climate Action Commission
April 12024
Page 4 of 5
creating a Climate Pledge activity for Welcome Week as part of a class project for their
Sustainable Systems course.
• The project strives to include both new students and current students living off campus.
• The students envisioned an implementation idea of infographics including QR code that
would appear on digital signs throughout campus and printed as paper copies. Figuring
out the measurable impact of someone taking the pledge is the next step for the class.
• Sturdevant asked if collaboration across university programs is already taking place.
Quin answered that the Office of Sustainability has been helpful for reaching out to
various departments.
• Sillman noted that the number fact related to water savings was impactful; similar facts
for other actions would be recommended.
• Fraser asked if they had considered where the greatest resistance might be.
• Smith asked if information would be collected from those who sign up to take the pledge,
and whether follow-up would occur.
• Gade asked if there were incentives for signing the pledge. Shetty noted 'Buy Local'
could be part of it.
• Shetty also asked if a social media campaign was planned.
RECAP:
• Confirmation of next meeting time and location:
o Monday, May 6, 3:30-5 p.m., Emma J. Harvat Hall
• Actionable items for commission, working groups, and staff:
C) Discuss green jobs in the next meeting
C) Tyler Baird will present about City forestry efforts
ADJOURNMENT:
Grimm moved to adjourn, Sillman seconded the motion. A vote was taken, and the motion
passed 10-0. Meeting adjourned 4:52.
4
Climate Action Commission
April 12024
Page 5 of 5
CLIMATE ACTION
COMM ISSI ONATTENDANCE
RECORD
2023-2024
N m V W N O N N W A
(➢ A
NAME TERM EXP. w w w w w w w w a a a a
Michael 12/31/2025 NM O/ X O/
Anderson E E
Michal Eynon- 12/31/2024 X NM X X X X X X NM X X X
Lynch
Elizabeth 12/31/2025 X NM O/ X
Fitzsimmons E
John Fraser 12/31/2024 O/ NM X O/ X X X NM X X X
E E
Jamie Gade 12/31/2025 O/ NM X X X O/ X X NM X X X
E E
Ben Grimm 10/31/2023 X NM X O/ X X X X NM X O/ X
E E
Zach Haralson 12/31/2025 NM X X X
Matt Krieger 12/31/2023 X NM X O/ X O/ X O/
E E E
Jesse MidAmerican X NM X
Leckband Rep
Wm Murray MidAmerican X X X X X NM X X X
Rep
Michelle 12/31/2002 O/ NM X X X X X X NM O/ X X
Sillman 5 E E
Brinda Shetty UI Rep X NM X O/ X X X O/ NM X X X
E E
Angie Smith 12/31/2025 X X NM X X X
Gabe 12/31/2024 X NM X X X X O/ X NM X X X
Sturdevant E
Matt Walter 12/31/2023 X NM X X X X O/ X
E
KEY:X = Present
0 =Absent
0/E =Absent/Excused
NM= No Meeting
" No longer on Commission
5
Item Number: 4.d.
CITY OF OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
May 21, 2024
Community Police Review Board: April 9 [See Recommendation]
Attachments: Community Police Review Board: April 9 [See Recommendation]
r
�.:. -4 CITY OF IOWA CITY
=r'° �� MEMORANDUM
Date: May 15, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Connie McCurdy, Community Police Review Board Staff
Re: Recommendation from Community Police Review Board
At their April 9, 2024 meeting the Community Police Review Board made the following
recommendation to the City Council:
(1) Accept CPRB #2403 Summary Dismissal-
Additional action (check one
x No further action needed
Board or Commission is requesting Council direction
_ Agenda item will be prepared by staff for Council action
FINAL/APPROVED
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
MINUTES —APRIL 09, 2024
CALL TO ORDER Chair Jensen called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Melissa Jensen, Ricky Downing, Saul Mekies, Orville Townsend,
Jerri MacConnell, Amanda Remington,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jessica Hobart
STAFF PRESENT: Staff Connie McCurdy, Legal Counsel Patrick Ford (5:35 p.m.),
City Clerk Kellie Grace
OTHERS PRESENT: Police Chief Dustin Liston, City Council Liaison Laura Bergus
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL
(1) Accept CPRB 24-03 Summary Dismissal.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by Townsend, seconded by Downing, to adopt the consent calendar as presented.
• Minutes of the meeting on 03112124.
• ICPD Quarterly Summary Report IAIR/CPRB, 11 Quarter 2024.
Commissioner Mekies stated that he will be absent from the 05/14/24 meeting. Vice-Chair Downing
noted that he will be absent from the 08113124 meeting. City Clerk Grace mentioned that Commissioner
Remington's and Commissioner Townsend's terms expire 06/30/24.
Motion carried 6/0. Commissioner Hobart absent.
NEW BUSINESS
ICPD process for determining when a mental health liaison is called to assist an officer during a call:
Commissioner Mekies had requested this agenda item at the 03/12/24 meeting.
Chief Liston stated that all officers are trained in mental crisis help. When the officers respond to calls,
they assess the situation to determine if a liaison is needed. The department has two liaisons that they
use, and they follow up with the individuals after the initial call. Chief Liston also noted that they engage
with DHS frequently in certain situations.
Commissioner Remington mentioned that follow ups are needed to ensure individuals get the help they
need. Commissioner Mekies had concerns about the lack of social workers, and what the results of that
might be, and how society will view it.
CPRB
April 09, 2024 FINALIAPPROVED
Page 2
Commissioner Townsend would like to know if there is a way to show the value of this program to the
City Council so it will remain in place and not be cut. Chief Liston mentioned that he's talked with the
council about performing studies that would show a comparison between the number of calls received
by an individual before engaging with a mental health liaison or Mobile Crisis and then after they have
received help from one or the other.
Commissioner MacConnell noted that some individuals won't accept help, and so court orders are
sometimes needed. She also mentioned that mental health workers cannot go out thinking that they
can fix situations without needing the police at times. MacConnell stated that the police are needed,
and the safety of police officers and mental health workers are important.
OLD BUSINESS
Chair Jensen noted that there was no old business.
Commissioner Mekies wanted to know the status of the Legislature's attempt to do away with the
CPRB. Chair Jensen responded to this saying that it did not pass.
Commissioner Townsend noted a mistake on his attendance record. Staff will make the correction on
the final approved minutes to City Council.
PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Dean Abel spoke to concerns that he had about legislation that would abolish the Police review boards.
He mentioned that it passed in the Senate, but the House of Representatives wanted to tweak it. He
then asked if the board did anything about it, such as write a letter.
Chair Jensen responded saying that they were aware of it and that she was contacted by a reporter,
however; a letter was not written.
Commissioner MacConnell stated that she talked to the Chief and found out that the City Manager was
aware of this situation, and that the City has a liaison that works with our representatives.
Chief Liston noted that the city has a lobbyist. Abel wanted to know if the lobbyist took a position on it,
and Chief Liston said that he was unaware.
Legal Counsel Patrick Ford intervened to stop the discussion noting that this should be put on the
agenda for next month (this will be added to New Business on the May 14, 2024, agenda).
Commissioner Remington explained to Abel that they couldn't continue the conversation because it
was not on the current agenda, and it needed to be noticed to the public before it could be discussed.
Abel thanked the board for putting it on the next agenda,
CPRB
April 09, 2024 FINAL/APPROVED
Page 3
BOARD INFORMATION
Commissioner Remington mentioned that a discussion is needed regarding Dean Abel's concerns
about the legislature abolishing review boards. This item will be added to New Business on the May
2024 agenda.
Commissioner Mekies wanted to make a certificate for retired CPRB staff Tammy Neumann in
recognition of her work with the board. Staff McCurdy brought a sample for the board to review. The
board members all agreed, and a formal certificate was signed at the meeting by Chair Jensen.
STAFF INFORMATION
City Clerk Grace introduced Connie McCurdy as the new CPRB staff person. Grace noted that she will
attend a few meetings with McCurdy until she is settled in.
TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS (subject to change)
• May 14, 2024, 5:30 PM, Helling Conference Room
• June 11, 2024, 5:30 PM., Helling Conference Room
• July 9, 2024, 5:30 PM, Helling Conference Room
• August 13, 2024, 5:30 PM, Helling Conference Room
Vice-Chair Downing was curious about having enough members for the meetings after Commissioner
Remington and Commissioner Townsend were done with their terms at the end of June. City Clerk
Grace noted that the vacancies will be advertised beforehand, and the hope is that they will be filled so
new members can start in July.
The Board agreed to no changes to the existing meeting schedule at this time but will review it again at
future meetings.
Commissioner MacConnell noted that there was only one board vacancy listed in the City Council
meeting minutes in the newspaper. Staff will look into this issue.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Motion by Commissioner Remington, seconded by Commissioner Mekies, to adjourn into Executive
Session based on Section 21.5(1)(a)of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are
required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a
condition for that government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11)
personal information in confidential personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities,
boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports, except where
disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18)Communications not required by law, rule
or procedure that are made to a government body or to any of its employees by identified persons
outside of government, to the extent that the government body receiving those communications from
such persons outside of government could reasonably believe that those persons would be
discouraged from making them to that government body if they were available for general public
examination.
Motion carried 610. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Open session adjourned 6:03 p.m.
CPRE
April 09, 2024 FINAUAPPROVED
Page 4
REGULAR SESSION
Returned to open session at 6:16 p.m.
Motion by Commissioner MacConnell, second by Chair Jensen, to set level of review for CPRE
Complaint 23-15 to 8-8-7 (13)(1)(A), on the record with no additional investigation.
Motion carried 610. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Motion by Commissioner MacConnell, second by Commissioner Townsend, to set level of review for
CPRB Complaint 24-01 to 8-8-7 (13)(1)(A), on the record with no additional investigation.
Motion carried 6(0. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Motion by Commissioner Remington, second by Vice-Chair Downing, to summarily dismiss CPRB
Complaint 24-03.
Motion carried 610. Commissioner Hobart absent.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Commissioner Remington, seconded by Vice-Chair Downing to adjourn.
Motion carried 610. Commissioner Hobart absent.
Meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m.
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
ATTENDANCE RECORD
YEAR 2023-2024
(Me ting Date
TERM 0509/23 W3323 7tl123 3/823 9112123 10/3/23 INT0/23 lt(l 3 AVID 01/11R4 OZd3124 3/1224 04N924
NAME EXPIRES Forum
Rkky 6/36/26 O/E X X X X X X X X X X X X
➢owning
A." 6/30/26 — — — X X X X X X X X O/E
nobar(
Melissa 6262s X X X X X O/E X X X O/E X O/E X
Jeoxen
Jerri WW7 X X X O/E Y X X X X X X O/E X
Mu ..ell
Saul Mekiec 6/3W25 X X X O/E X X X X X O/E X X X
Amanda 6/30124 X X X X X X O/E X X WE X O/E X
Remi�mn
Orville W30n4 X X X X X X X X X X OX X X
Tawasead
slue,( WQn4 O/E O — — — — — — — — — — —.
Vantler Yegtr
KEY: X = Present
O =Absent
OfE=Absent/Excused
NM=No meeting
--- =Not a Member
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW BOARD
A Board of the City of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City IA 52240-1826
(319)356-5041
CPRB REPORT OF SUMMARY DISMISSAL TO THE CITY
COUNCIL
Re: Investigation of Complaint CPRB 2403
CPRE Complaint 24-03, filed March 26, 2024, was summarily dismissed as
required by the City Code, Section 8-8-3(D) and 8-8-3(E). The complaint was not
filed within 180 (one hundred eight) days of the alleged misconduct.
City Code, Section 8-8-3(D):
D. All complaints to the board must be filed with the City Clerk within one
hundred eighty (180) days of the alleged misconduct.
City Code, Section 8-8-3(E)
E. Only those complaints to the board which do not involve the conduct
of an Iowa City sworn police officer or are not filed within one hundred
eighty (180) days of the alleged misconduct may be subject to summary
dismissal by the board.
DATED: April 9, 2024
- r
V
PUBMmeliness Report Form:4l13t99