HomeMy WebLinkAboutTRC Agenda 11 21 2024 Ad Hoc Truth and Reconciliation Commission
Thursday, November 21, 2024
Regular Meeting
7 PM – Emma Harvat Hall, City Hall
410 E. Washington Street
AGENDA:
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. READING OF NATIVE AMERICAN LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.
3. PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (COMMISSIONERS
SHALL NOT ENGAGE IN DISCUSSION WITH THE PUBLIC CONCERNING
SAID ITEMS.) 5 MINUTE MAXIMUM FOR EACH SPEAKER.
Only in-person comments will be allowed for Public Comment. Public comment
for specific agenda items, which must be directly related to that agenda item,
may be made in-person or remotely.
4. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM OCTOBER 17, 2024.
5. ACTIONS FOR PHASES THREE AND FOUR:
A. FINAL REPORT.
B. RECOMMENDATIONS.
C. PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
D. OTHER.
6. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMISSIONERS.
7. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF STAFF.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
In order to encourage input from the public, the Commission intends to offer the opportunity
to participate in the meeting remotely. However, this meeting is in-person, and those
wishing to ensure their ability to participate should attend the meeting in-person.
If you instead wish to participate remotely, you may attempt to do so by joining the below
link.
First Thursday Meetings
ID: 867 2424 8095
Third Thursday Meetings
ID: 895 3695 0485
If you have no computer or smartphone, or a computer without a microphone, you can
call in by phone by dialing (312) 626-6799 and entering the meeting ID when prompted.
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to attend all City of Iowa City-sponsored events. If you are a
person with a disability who requires a reasonable accommodation in order to participate in these events,
please contact the Office of Equity and Human Rights at 319-356-5022 or humanrights@iowa-city.org.
1
November 7, 2024 Draft Ad Hoc Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Minutes Emma Harvat Hall
Commissioners present: Amos Kiche, Chastity Dillard, Lou Tassinary.
Commissioners on Zoom: Chad Simmons, Lubna Mohamed.
Commissioners not present: Kayla Rossi, Wangui Gathua, Cliff Johnson, Lauren Merritt.
Staff present: Stefanie Bowers.
Recommendation to City Council: No.
Meeting called to order: 7:17 PM.
Reading of Land Acknowledgment: Dillard read the Land Acknowledgment.
Public Comment of Items not on the Agenda: No.
Approval of the Minutes from October 17, 2024: Dillard moved and Tassinary seconded, motion
passed 5-0.
Final Report: Kiche presented a draft of an agreement for the report writer. Kiche requested that
the commission review the agreement together and make any necessary changes. Dillard thanked
Kiche for his work and stated she had read through the document and had no changes. Tassinary
shared he has reservations with Section 3: Obligations of Party A and Deliverables. Tassinary was
under the impression the work with consultants had covered this area and rather than repeating
that aspect the commission can refer to the original report made by the consultants. Dillard agreed
with Tassinary and his idea to consolidate the information of section 3 to highlight their main
takeaways from the original report. Specific areas of the report Tassinary was referring to include
History of the TRC in Relation to George Floyd’s Murder, The Results of Community
Negotiations, The Charter, The Mission, and Other TRC Worldwide in the U.S. Kiche understood
Tassinary’s concerns and shared he wants to be sure all aspects of the work the TRC has done are
documented in their final report.
Simmons proposed some questions to be considered by the commission in relation to both the
report made by the consultants and the pending report to be written. The first question was, where
will the report address the challenges and overall experiences of the commission. Dillard agreed
that should be an additional section to the report due to the fact it was not included in the draft.
Simmons suggested making it the main framework of the report to highlight how the commission
2
operated during those challenges. Some challenges mentioned by Simmons include commissioner
turnover raters, commissioner relationships (within the commission), inconsistencies in promises
and delivery, challenges working with the City, etc. Kiche agreed that these topics are important
and should be included in the report. Kiche suggested adding these concerns in section two. To
clarify, Dillard asked if the suggestions from Simmons should be a sentiment throughout the
whole report or if he would rather see them assigned to a specific section of the report. Simmons
confirmed he would like it to be a sentiment throughout the whole report. Dillard suggested
allowing the new report writer to sit down with each commissioner and get their personal
experience of their time on the commission to execute Simmons’ sentiment successfully
throughout the report. Simmons agreed to Dillard’s suggestion. Kiche suggested adding a
“Challenges Faced” section to each main subject of the report. Simmons stated that the main focus
when mentioning the challenges would be to highlight the challenges the commission faced
together as a team working under the City Council. Simmons also mentioned the lack of support
he felt the commission received from the City Council. Kiche asked Simmons if the challenges
specific to City Council could fit in section 6 of the report dedicated to recommendations.
Simmons agreed section 6 could serve as one section of the report to include comments of culture
within the TRC. Tassinary shared he agrees with the need to include Simmons’ suggestions
however he also shared concerns that what they are asking of the report writer may not be
achievable due to time. Simmons suggested giving the report writer highlights that the commission
would like to see included in the report. The report writer would then do interviews that would
allow him to touch on the topics highlighted with each commissioner. Dillard agreed it may be a
large undertaking for the report writer and that the interviews would be helpful in understanding
the work and experiences of the commissioners. Dillard also suggested commissioners write out
their experiences and thoughts and give those to the report writer in place of an interview (or along
with an interview). Dillard suggested adding into the agreement that the report writer will consult
with each of the commissioners for information on their experience. Simmons asked Dillard about
suggestions on how the commission’s work could have been done differently and when the
commission could discuss that and later be included in the report. Tassinary suggested presenting
the information of what could have been done differently in January when the commission meets
with City Council (separate from the report). Simmons stated he planned to share information with
the group before the next meeting for it to be discussed and possibly used in the report. Dillard
encouraged other commissioners to do the same and to speak with the report writer if they feel
they have time and information to share. Staff clarified the changes made to the draft report
3
include two additional sections for experiences and challenged face by commissioners. Staff also
confirmed the original report will act more as a guide for the commission’s report rather than a
document to be referenced alongside the final report.
Mohamed mentioned she would like to meet with the report writer to discuss her experiences.
Staff encouraged the commission to utilize the recommendations area of the report to also discuss
experiences and challenges leading up to the commission’s Dec. 31 deadline. Dillard inquired
about the flexibility of the report or if it would be necessary for the commission to insert a clause
that allows for changes to the report after the first draft is complete. Staff answered that the
flexibility should be part of the process in receiving the draft and returning any corrections to the
writer before the report is finalized.
Kiche brought up that the writer has not discussed payment. Dillard suggested getting the draft to
him asap. Staff recommended confirming compensation and deadlines among the commission to
get an agreement to the writer. Staff mentioned keeping past compensation in mind when coming
up with a total to be paid for the written report. Tassinary added that work is looking to be roughly
$8,000.00 if the writer is paid $50 per hour. Staff confirmed that work on the report cannot be
started until an agreement is signed between the writer and the City Staff also stated that the
agreement would be with the City of Iowa City. Staff stated submission dates and end dates stated
in the agreement must be firm and specific. Dillard asked if there was any way the report could be
finished by the 31st but submitted after the commissions end date. Staff stated it should be
completed and submitted by the 31st of December. Dillard brought up the possibility of asking for
an extension, if necessary, in the future. Simmons suggested prioritizing shortening the report and
finalizing the report by the commission’s last meeting before it is time to submit.
The commission summarized a timeline of:
•Signed and Finalized Agreement: (around) November 19
•Final Draft: December 17
•Report Submission: Prior to December 31
4
Simmons suggested starting with an offer of $4,000 for the written report and to negotiate from
there. Simmons suggested voting for the commission chair (Dillard) to green light the final
negotiation price with a cap of $8,000.00.
*A brief pause occurred due to lack of quorum*
The meeting resumed with a motion by Tassinary to authorize City staff to move forward on the
MOU with the writer with the edited changes, Simmons seconded, passed 5-0.
Mohamed expressed concerns about the $8,000.00 payment to the writer. Clarification of the
content and purpose of the report was shared with Mohamed. Mohamed expressed her frustrations
with the commission and that she feels there could have been more done to help the community.
Dillard clarified there has been work with the community and the purpose of the commission has
been to find and understand the challenges facing the community to report back to City Council,
which will be the focus of the report. Mohamed feels as though her work towards change through
City committees has been unacknowledged. Dillard encouraged Mohamed to share these concerns
in the report. Dillard also informed Mohamed on her right to vote against the motion concerning
compensating the report writer. Mohamed expressed concern that the City Council will read the
report and no change will come from their efforts. Before Mohamed gives her vote on the amount
to be paid to the report writer, she asked for clarification and wants to know what will happen after
the report is given to City Council. Dillard answered that it is hoped that the City Council will hear
out the commission during their presentation and encouraged Mohamed to bring these concerns up
during the presentation. Dillard agreed to continue the conversation regarding Mohamed’s
concerns outside of the meeting.
Simmons moved that the commission chair has the ability to change the financial agreement with
the contractor for writing the report up to $8,000.00. Tassinary seconded, moved 5-0.
Kiche questioned the need for a timeframe to be added to the motion concerning the payment for
the report. Kiche expressed concerns of paying before receiving any draft/ materials. Dillard
questioned the need to redo the motion previously agreed upon. Staff suggested waiting for the
5
City Attorney for definitive answers. Staff will ask for clarification and will report back
to commissioners outside of the meeting.
Announcement of Commissioners: None.
Announcement of Staff: None.
The meeting adjourned at 9:09 PM.
The full meeting video can be viewed at this link.
AD HOC TRUTH & RECONCILIATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD YEAR 2024
(Meeting Date)
NAME TERM EXP. 3/21 4/4 5/2 5/16 6/20 7/18 8/1 8/15 9/5 9/19 10/3 10/17 11/7
Dillard 12/31/24 P P P P P P P A P P Z P P
Gathua 12/31/24 P P A A Z Z Z A Z P P P A
Kiche 12/31/24 P P P P P P P P P P P P P
Johnson 12/31/24 P P P P P P P P P A A A A
Merritt 12/31/24 P P P A P P P P Z A Z A A
Muhamed 12/31/24 - - - Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z A Z
Simmons 12/31/24 P Z P P A P A A A Z Z A Z
Tassinary 12/31/24 P A P P P A P P A P A P P
Rossi 12/31/24 - - - - A Z A A A A A Z A
P = Present in person A = Absent
Z = Zoom