HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-01-21 Bd Comm minutesItem Number: 3.a.
a
CITY OF IOWA CITY
"QF T-4 COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
January 21, 2025
Charter Review Commission: December 17 [See Recommendation]
Attachments: Charter Review Commission: December 17 [See Recommendation]
r
, .0-4 CITY OF IOWA CITY
MEMORANDUM
Date:
January 14, 2025
To:
Mayor and City Council
From:
Kellie Grace, City Clerk
Re:
Recommendation from Charter Review Commission
At their December 17, 2024 meeting the Charter Review Commission made the following
recommendation(s) to the City Council:
Accept the Final Report of the 2024-2025 Iowa City Charter Review Commission and the final
proposed amendments to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission.
Additional action (check one)
❑ No further action needed
❑ Board or Commission is requesting direction from City Council
® Agenda item will be prepared by staff for City Council action
Approved by
Chair Balmer
Minutes
Charter Review Commission
December 17, 2024 — 5:30 p.m.
Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall
Members Present: John Balmer, Susan Craig, John Deeth, Gerene Denning, Mackenzie
De Roo, Matt Hayek, Molly Kucera (via Zoom), Bijou Maliabo (5:33 p.m.), Jennifer Patel
Staff Present: City Attorney Goers, City Clerk Grace
(Videos of the meetings are available at citychannel4.com typically within 48 hours)
Recommendations to Council: (to become effective only after separate Council action):
Accept the Final Report of the 2024-2025 Iowa City Charter Review Commission and the final
proposed amendments to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission.
Call to order and roll call
2. Motion to adopt draft minutes as presented or amended
Commissioner Deeth noted a typographical errors were noted in item 5 at the bottom of
page one, Goer to Goers. Commissioner Craig noted Goers was also misspelled on page
two under item 8.01(C)(3).
Moved by Deeth, seconded by Craig to approve the November 25 draft minutes as
amended. Motion carried 8-0, Maliabo absent.
3. Motion to Accept Correspondence
No correspondence received.
4. Motion approving language regarding Mayoral election
Motion to approve the language regarding Mayoral election. Motion carried 5-3, Deeth,
Denning, and Patel voting no. Maliabo absent.
Commissioner Hayek noted that it was often difficult for Commissioner Maliabo to get to the
meetings by 5:30 p.m. and asked if she would be able to vote on the item. City Attorney
Goers stated that since she had not missed any discussion or debate there was no reason
why she couldn't vote.
Maliabo arrived at 5:33 p.m., City attorney Goers summarized the prior vote, Maliabo voted
in favor of approving the language regarding Mayoral election.
Motion to approve the language regarding Mayoral election. Motion carried 6-3,
Deeth, Denning, and Patel voting no.
Charter Review Commission
December 17, 2024
Page 2
5. Motion approving language regarding district representative elections
Motion to approve the language regarding district representative elections. Motion
carried 6-3, Deeth, Denning, and Patel voting no.
6. Motion approvinq Iowa City Charter Working Draft
Chair Balmer noted the robust discussion by the Commission and encouraged a unanimous
vote on the final version to send to City Council. Other Commissioners agreed with Balmer
pointing out the strength of the system and process, and the vibrant democratic process.
Motion to approve the Iowa City Charter Working Draft dated November 25. Motion
carried 9-0.
City Attorney Goers asked the Commission if they would authorize the City Attorney and
City Clerk make formatting and non -substantive grammatical changes for to produce a clean
final version.
Moved by Deeth, seconded by Patel to authorize the City Attorney and City Clerk
make formatting and non -substantive grammatical changes for to produce a clean
final version. Motion carried 9-0.
7. Review Draft Reoort of the 2024-2025 Iowa Citv Charter Review Commission
Chair Balmer thanked the City Attorney and City Clerk for helping the Commission construct
the draft. Commissioners commended its readability, organization, and alignment with
previous discussions. Commissioners also noted the importance of transparency,
referencing the decision to publish the draft publicly on the commission's website. Individual
Commissioners expressed their views.
8. Motion approving Draft Report of the 2024-2025 Iowa City Charter Review
Commission
Moved by DeRoo, seconded by Craig to approve the draft report of the 2024-2025
Iowa City Charter Review Commission. Motion carried 9-0.
9. Discussion regarding the Report of the 2024-2025 Iowa City Charter Review
Commission to City Council
Chair Balmer stated he and Vice Chair Kucera will present the approved report to the City
Council during an upcoming work session. Commissioners were invited to attend the
meeting but were reminded not to deliberate further to avoid quorum complications.
10. Tentative Meeting Schedule
The commission agreed that no further meetings were necessary as the review process was
complete.
11. Community Comment
No one appeared.
Charter Review Commission
December 17, 2024
Page 3
12. Acknowledgements/Recognition
Chair Balmer commended all participants, staff, and public contributors for their input and
dedication. Commissioners noted the importance of civic engagement and transparency,
expressing satisfaction with the process and noted the call to encourage greater voter
participation and community involvement in governance. Individual Commissioners
expressed their views.
13. Adjournment:
Moved by Maliabo, seconded by Hayek to adjourn the meeting at 5:51 p.m. Motion
carried 9-0.
Charter Review Commission
December 17, 2024
Page 4
Charter Review Commission - 2024
ATTENDANCE RECORD
TERM
o
�
0
Ob
0
Ob
0
U1
0
U1
0
CD
0
CD
0
co
o
co 0
0
N
NAME
EXP.
O
O
W
N
v+
�
N
w
.i
N
•i
w
N O
co co
N
46
O
-4
N
v,
-4
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
A A
N
A
N
A
N
A
A
John Balmer
4/1/25
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Susan Craig
4/1/25
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
John Deeth
4/1/25
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
Gerene Denning
4/1/25
X
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
Mackenzie DeRoo
4/1/25
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Matt Hayek
4/1/25
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Molly Kucera
4/1/25
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Bijou Maliabo
4/1/25
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Jennifer Patel
4/1/25
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Key:
X = Present
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = No meeting
--- = Not a member
Kellie Grace
From: John Balmer <john@pscia.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2025 8:50 AM
To: Kellie Grace
Subject: RE: December 17 - Draft Charter Review minutes
AI
** This per .awl originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or
attachments. **
Kellie.
I have reviewed the proposed draft minutes for the December 17 Charter Review Committee and they meet with
my approval.
Again thank you and City Attorney Goers for your support and dedication to Iowa City.
It has been my distinct pleasure to get to work with and know you both.
Thankyou
John
IPSE
DISTRIBUTION
JOHN BALMER
PH: 319-338-3601
FAX: 319-337-7937
www.oscia.com
DON
From: Kellie Grace <KG race@ iowa-city.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2025 2:52 PM
To: John Balmer <john@pscia.com>
Subject: December 17 - Draft Charter Review minutes
This message originated from outside PSC.
Please review the attached draft minutes and respond to this email as approved or approved as amended
noting the amendments.
Thank you
i
mmIloWACITY
A UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE
Keffie Come, CVC
City Clerk
office: 319-356-5041
410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240
WWW.ICGOV ORG
O QO
FARE FREE
IOWA CITY
Disclaimer
Iowa City Transit is now FARE FREE!
Learn more at ICGOV.ORG/FAREFREE
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and
others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
Resort of the 2024-2025 Iowa Ci
Charter Review Commission
The Commission and the Process. The Iowa City Charter Review Commission was established by the
Iowa City Council on January 2"d, 2024. Created pursuant to Section 8.02 of the Iowa City Charter, the
Commission was charged with "review[ing] the existing charter" and "recommend[ing] any charter
amendments that it deems fit to the council." The Charter Review Commission is tasked with engaging
in a deep and thorough review of the Charter "at least once every ten years."
Commission members were appointed by Council at their February 20th and March 19th meetings. They
include Chair John Balmer, Vice -Chair Molly Kucera, Susan Craig, John Deeth, Gerene Denning,
Mackenzie De Roo, Matt Hayek, Bijou Maliabo, and Jennifer Patel. The Commission had their first
meeting on April 111, 2024, and met a total of 16 times, including two Community Forums to receive
community input. The Commission decided at their first meeting that they would welcome public
comment and input at all of their meetings and encouraged the public to participate in their work at
every opportunity. All meetings were publicly posted, video recorded, and made available online. A
working draft of the red -lined changes to the Charter the Commission is recommending has been
available on the Commission's webpage throughout the process, tracking the Commission's work,
progress, or tentative positions. The Commission received in -person comments and written
correspondence. The Commission was aided in its work by the invaluable contributions of City Attorney
Eric Goers and City Clerk Kellie Grace. These are two very dedicated individuals who were instrumental
in making the Commission and its mission much easier.
The Report. This Report, the culmination of the Commission's work, is meant to provide a summary
review of the substantive changes recommended by the Commission. It supplements the "red -line"
version of the Charter showing all additions, deletions, and alterations recommended by the
Commission. In addition, the minutes of all Commission meetings are available online, as are the full
videos of all Commission meetings. Finally, the Commission Chair and Vice -Chair intend to make a
formal presentation to the Council regarding the Commission's work and recommendations. They will
make themselves available to assist the Council throughout their review of the Commission's
recommendations.
The Charter is made up of a Preamble, a Definitions section, and eight (8) Articles. This Report will
address each of them in turn, including changes that were considered but ultimately rejected. Much of
this Report will present changes to the Charter proposed by the Commission in exactly that way— as
proposed changes. However, forthe sake of brevity, portions of the Report will read as though the
Commission has amended the Charter itself. To be clear, the Commission acknowledges that under
Article VIII. of the Charter, the Commission has no authority to amend the Charter itself. Any and all
changes described herein or in the attached red -lined version of the Charter are simply changes
proposed by the Commission to the Council. It is the prerogative of the Council and/or City voters to
adopt proposed changes. Finally, the Commission has several recommendations not involving changes
to the Charter, but which are instead supportive of a healthy, democratic society. They will be listed at
the end of this Report.
Explanations of Recommended Charter Amendments. First, some discussion of whole cloth changes
proposed throughout the Charter. The Commission is recommending capitalization of all proper nouns,
such as the Council, the Charter, District A, the City, and the City Manager. The Commission also
proposes moving away from "he or she" to "they" to be more inclusive. Second, some explanation of
the red -lining in the accompanying Draft Charter. All proposed changes are reflected in red text. Stfike-
thrGogh font represents text the Commission proposes to delete. Underlined font represents text the
Commission proposes to add. Unde-rl stfike-thFea b font represents text the Commission proposed
adding to the Charter, but later reconsidered and deleted.
Preamble
The language in the Preamble was revised in several ways based on the National Civic League's Model
City Charter. The changes were proposed to emphasize representative democracy, environmental
stewardship, inclusivity, and professional management. The portion related to the principle of resident
participation was bolstered with language related to equitable participation in local government, with all
individuals having an opportunity to participate, and with discrimination prohibited under Title 2 of the
City Code not tolerated. The term "strong political leadership" was later replaced with "strong
leadership" to ensure neutrality.
Definitions
The only changes made to the Definitions section relate to capitalization conventions. There was
discussion about whether the terms "eligible elector" and "qualified elector" were both needed. The
conclusion was to retain both definitions because while Iowa City and State Code allow only qualified
electors (registered voters) to vote, eligible electors (those eligible to register to vote) are able to sign
petitions and otherwise engage in the local political process.
Article I: Powers of the City
Section 1.01 was strengthened to state, "The City shall have all powers possible under the constitution
and laws of this state." This was intended to ensure that the City, acting through the Council, have any
and all powers available to it. The Commission considered language from the Model Charter on
Intergovernmental Relations to allow for cooperative ventures with other governments, but found it
unnecessary, given the allowance already granted by State Code.
Article II: City Council
Probably the most significant and robust discussion by the Commission was about two elements of
Article II. The first was the composition, division, and election of District Council positions. The second
was the election of the Mayor.
District Council positions. The Iowa City Council presently consists of seven members, with four at -large
representatives and three district -specific representatives who are elected city-wide but reside in
different geographic districts. When primary elections are needed (if three or more candidates qualify
for election) for a District election, only voters residing in that District are allowed to vote in the primary.
The top two vote -getters advance to the general election in which all City voters may take part. This
system was designed to ensure geographic representation while maintaining City-wide accountability
for all Council members.
Several Commissioners advocated for allowing only voters residing in the District to take part in the
election of District Councilors. They felt only this method of election would make them truly District
Councilors and that this would allow for smaller, less expensive campaigns based on the smaller number
of voters the candidates needed to reach. The remaining Commissioners supported keeping the present
system in place, seeing the risk of parochialism in conflict with City-wide priorities. There was also fear
that given the process by which Mayors are selected, there would be a significant chance that Councilors
could select a Mayor for whom two-thirds of the City never had a chance to vote. These Commissioners
valued the opportunity of all City voters to have a say in the elections of all City Councilors.
There were a number of related topics the Commission discussed, but ultimately rejected. Those
included a discussion about increasing the total number of Councilors, changing the mix of District and
At -Large Council positions, and adding a dedicated Council position for a University of Iowa student.
Each idea had merit, but did not win majority support on the Commission.
Following lengthy discussion over the course of several meetings, the Commission voted 6-3 to retain
the current system, but proposed language in Section 2.01 to acknowledge that District Councilors are
not solely representatives of their Districts, but are instead intended "to ensure City-wide geographic
representation on the Council." The Commission advocated for more voter education about the
method by which Councilors are elected in Iowa City.
Election of the Mayor. The Commission discussed the role of the Mayor, focusing on whether the
Mayor should be elected directly by the public or chosen by the City Council, and the length of the
Mayor's term. At present, the Mayor is elected from among all Councilors by the Councilors themselves
at their organizational meeting immediately after seating new Councilors in January of even years.
Mayoral terms are two years.
Several Commissioners favored direct election of the Mayor, arguing it leant the office more legitimacy.
They further argued having a Mayor directly elected by voters would strengthen the connection
between City government and its residents, increase public interest in City government and
participation in civic affairs, and cause the Mayor to feel more directly accountable to the public,
potentially improving transparency and communication.
Commissioners favoring the status quo argued that maintaining the current system creates a stronger
Council by ensuring decisions reflect the position of the Council majority. They believed that a voting
Mayor promotes accountability and equality on the Council and fosters unity and cohesiveness within
the Council, which benefits the City's governance and its staff. They pointed outthat Council selection of
the Mayor promotes prior Council experience and diplomacy, and strengthens the Council as a collective
body. They expressed concerns about the potential risks of directly electing a Mayor with no Council
experience or with a strong personal agenda that might disrupt governance. Finally, they noted that
correspondence from former City officials and other public feedback predominantly supported retaining
the existing system. The Commission ultimately voted 6-3 to retain the current system, for the reasons
cited above.
Separately, Section 2.08, Appointments, was amended to add the appointments of the Police Chief and
Fire Chief, moving the language from Section 2.12, Prohibitions. While the language and location
changed, the process by which the Chiefs are appointed did not.
Section 2.12, Prohibitions, was modified as described above, and was amended in substance by adding
the staff of the City Attorney and City Clerk to the protections against Council interference afforded to
the staff of the City Manager. Because the Airport and Library staff are governed by the Airport
Commission and Library Board of Trustees, respectively, not any of the three Council appointees,
language was added to offer the same protection to those staffs by prohibiting interference with any
employee other than the three employed directly by Council. Those are the City Manager, City
Attorney, and City Clerk.
Article III: Nomination, Primary Election, and Regular Election
Only minor, non -substantive changes are proposed in Article III. The Commission discussed moving the
primary date earlier in the election cycle but found that the primary date is set by State Code.
Article IV: City Manager
Several minor, non -substantive changes were made. The only substantive change was to Section
4.04(A)(6), reflecting that the restrictions and obligations imposed on the City Manager by the Charter
come from City Code, not State Code. State Code provisions still apply but require no enabling by the
City Charter to have effect.
Article V: Boards, Commissions, and Committees
Section 5.01(A) was updated to encourage the Council to consider community demographics when
making appointments to ensure boards and commissions reflect Iowa City'sdiversity. The language
mandates consideration of demographics, not imposition of demographic quotas, as quotas would
offend Constitutional protections. The Commission also was cognizant that the Council can appoint only
4
from the pool of residents who apply. Gender balance was also discussed in light of the recent repeal of
a State law that mandated gender balance on many City boards and commissions.
There was also discussion about the Community Police Review Board. The state of recent bills regarding
police review boards was considered. While bills had been offered in recent years to prohibit police
review boards, none have passed thus far. It is possible similar bills will be presented in the future. If
such a bill were to pass, it is likely that Iowa City's Community Police Review Board would need to be
disbanded. The Commission alsoweighed the minimum number publicforumsto be held, deciding to
leave it at "at least one community forum each year."
Article VI: Campaign Contributions and Expenditures
Only minor, non -substantive changes are proposed in Article VI. The $100 contribution limit embedded
in an ordinance enabled by Section 6.01 of the Charter was retained, emphasizing fairness and
transparency in campaign financing.
Article VII. Initiative and Referendum
Section 7.01 was amended to make clear that personnel decisions are not subject to initiative or
referendum petitions. Section 7.05 was updated to align with changes to State Code on election dates,
while preserving the intent of prompt elections on valid petitions. Section 7.05 was also amended to
mirror Council's ability under Section 8.01 to adopt the proposal made in the petition, negating the need
for an election on that issue.
Article Vill: Charter Amendments and Review
Section 8.01 was amended to reference Section 7.05(B), relating to election dates, ensuring consistency
and adaptability to future changes in State election law. Section 8.01 was also amended to allow the
Council to adopt the substance of a Charter amendment petition without having to hold an election.
The language mirrors the substance of Section 7.05 governing initiative and referendum petitions.
Other Recommendations
The Commission discussed concerns with declining local media coverage of City government and City
elections. It was hypothesized that this decline in local coverage has contributed to lower voter
engagement. The Commission proposes that Council promote multi -jurisdictional initiatives to improve
voter turnout, including multi -generational education programs, a task force, multimedia outreach, and
nonpartisan guides such asthose provided by Greater Iowa City, Inc. The Commission was also
concerned about declining candidate participation, particularly in District Council elections, which are
often uncontested.
Conclusion
The Iowa City Charter Review Commission appreciated the opportunity to take part in this important
process. Commission members enjoyed the vigorous but respectful debates they held on numerous
issues foundational to the governance of the City. The Charter is essentially the Constitution of the City
of Iowa City, an importance not lost on Commissioners as they weighed possible changes to propose.
While not all decisions made were unanimous, the recommendations as a whole contained in this
Report and accompanying red -lined draft Charter carry the authority of a unanimous vote of the
Commission.
Pursuant to Section 8.02 of the Charter, the Council may adopt all, some, or none of the Commission's
proposed changes. Any changes not adopted must go on the ballot for City voters to decide. Because
the Commission, made up of residents appointed by Council, spent many hours over the course of
months developing these recommendations, with input from the public, the Commission respectfully
asks that the Council adopt the Commission's proposed changes in their entirety.
As a Commission, we thank you for the opportunity to serve, and look forward to your discussion of
these matters. Thank you for your own service on Council.
Respectfully submitted this 17th day of December, 2024.
Iowa City Charter Review Commission
By:_ _,�2�a��
JohrrBalmer, Chairperson
On behalf of Commission Members:
Molly Kucera, Vice -Chair
Susan Craig
John Deeth
Gerene Denning
Mackenzie DeRoo
Matt Hayek
Bijou Maliabo
Jennifer Patel
The following is a clean copy of'the w2E&jft:dr•a ft of proposed amendments as of Ataye
3Oecenrber 17, 2024 to the lovva City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. The
Eer�n:rissie�-#a��{�neli�-t-�- pa�a!#�eEe�ie�-a+�en�$r-¢sr�
eh� e-
IOWA CITY CHARTER 1
Preamble
Definitions
Article 1, Powers Aof Tthe City
§ 1.01. Powers Aof Tthe City.
§ 1.02. Construction.
§ 1.03. Savings Clause.
Article 1I. City Council
§ 2.01. Composition.
§ 2.02. Division linto Council Districts.
§ 2.03. Eligibility.
§ 2.04. Terms.
§ 2.05. Compensation.
§ 2.06. Mayor.
§ 2.07. General Powers Aagnd Duties.
§ 2.08. Appointments.
§ 2.09. Rules; Records.
§ 2.10. Vacancies.
§ 2.11. Council Action.
§ 2.12. Prohibitions.
Article I1I. Nomination, Primary Election Aand Regular Election
§ 3.01. Nomination.
§ 3.02. Primary Election.
§ 3.03. Regular City Election.
Article IV. City Manager
§ 4.01. Appointment; Qualifications.
Page 1
The Following is a clean copy a f the weE&W-draft of proposed amendments os of Akwom
Qecm er 17, 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Cammissinn �#e
&sri�sis� #as-e�l��i�etft-k���as�t�F�l-�s�e►emend� es;��e��;iec-t-Fe
Vie=
§ 4.02. Accountability; Removal.
§ 4.03. Absence; Disability AQf City Manager.
§ 4.04. Duties AQf City Manager.
§ 4.05. Ineligibility; Prohibited Acts.
Article V. Boards, Commissions Aand Committees
§ 5.01. Establishment.
§ 5.02. Appointment; Removal.
§ 5.03. Rules.
Article VI. Campaign Contributions Apnd Expenditures
§ 6.01. Limitations AQn t-The Amount 8Qf Campaign Contributions.
§ 6.02. Disclosure AQf Contributions Apnd Expenditures.
§ 6.03. Definition.
§ 6.04. Violations.
Article VII. Initiative Aand Referendum
§ 7.01. General Provisions.
§ 7.02. Commencement AUf Proceedings, Affidavit.
§ 7.03. Petitions; Revocation AQf Signatures.
§ 7.04. Procedure Aafter Filing.
§ 7.05. Action AQn Petitions.
§ 7.06. Results AQf Election.
§ 7.07. Prohibition 0 n Establishment AQf Stricter Conditions Apr Requirements.
Article V1II. Charter Amendments Aand Review
§ 8.01. Charter Amendments.
§ 8.02. Charter Review Commission.
Notes
Page 2
The following is a clean copy of the werkine-draft o proposed amendments as Qf Nk:en4ee
2- December I7, 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. the
1. The home rule cCharter of the sCity, adopted by the voters of the sCity on
November 15, 1973, and by ordinance 76-2792 on January 2,1976, pursuantto I.C.A.
section 372.9, is set out herein as adopted and amended.
PREAMBLE
We, the people of Iowa City, Iowa, pursuant to the constitution and statutes of the sState of
Iowa and the principle of self-determination, proclaim that the government of Iowa City
belongs to all its residents and all share the responsibility for it. We hereby adopt this
ECharter and confer upon it the full home rule powers of a charter city.in order to provide
for an honest and accountable council-manager government. By this action,we Secure the
benefits of home rule and affirm the values of representative democracy, professional
management, strong fsekit- c leadership. public engagement, diversity and inclusiveness,
regional cooperation, and fist stewardship of our unique environment.
Furthermom adoption of this Charter- recognizes the following principles:
1. Resident participation on an equitable and inclusive basis as l2art of the Process of ta
democratic self-government.
a. Each individual sh-aU have an opoortunity to participate in the life of the City.
including economic, ctrlturai and intellectual.
b. Discriminatioii prohibited by Title 2 of the City Code shall not be tolerated.
2. The provision of service relating to the health, safety, and welfare of its residents in
a fair, equitable and efficient manner.
3. The conduct of c-City business inconformity with the principles pjjflfijM s and
practices, oFdue process, equal protection under the laws, and protection of theseindividual
liberties pw-eteeEegranted by the eConstitution of the United States, tithe sState of Iowa,
and by local ordinances.
4. Civility and responsiveness_by sCity employees in their interactions with the public.
(Ord. 15-4621,5-19-2015)
DEFINITIONS
As used in this eCharter:
1. "City" means the sCity of Iowa City, Iowa.
Page 3
The following it a cleat copy of the otdraft of proposed amendments as of Nevembeg:
24&cember 1 Z 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. Xhe
Ce�a�iss�r #ef-x�et-€RaJi�e� �te-�esa� ee�� �et£w Eiel�r�d�►eeEs � ft� h� �e
2. "City eCouncil" or "eCouncil" means the governing body of the FCity.
3. "Council member" means a member of the eCouncil, including the mMayor.
4. "Shall" imposes a duty.
S. "Must" states a requirement.
6. "May" confers a power.
7. "Eligible elector" means a person eligible to register to vote in Iowa City.
8. "Qualified elector" means a resident of Iowa City who is registered to vote in Iowa
City.
9. "Board" includes a board, commission, committee or other similar entity however
designated.
10. "Person" means an individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association,
political party, committee or any other legal entity.
11. "Ordinance" means a city law of a general and permanent nature.
12. "Measure", except as provided in aArticle VII, means an ordinance, amendment,
resolution or motion. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976; amd. Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985; Ord. 05-
4152, 3-1-2005)
ARTICLE 1. POWERS OF THE CITY
Section 1.01. Powers Gof Tthe it .
The c-City has -shall have all powers possible under the constitution and laws of this state.
(Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 1.02. Construction.
The grant of power to the eCity under this eCharter is intended to be broad; the mention of
a specific power in this ECharter is not intended to be a limitation on the general powers
conferred in this article. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 1.03. Savings Clause.
Page 4
The following is a clean copy of the weFkj'Rgjra ft o f Dronosed amendments as of Xo 4?r
2—SDeCember 17. 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. Th-e
��faesx�fli��-p�ese�ell�e�rEi�le�eH�ea��sa�ele �.�s
If any provision of this eCharter, or the application of this eCharter to any person or
circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications
of this eCharter. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
ARTICLE IL CITY COUNCIL
The eCity eCouncil consists of seven members. As provided in aArticle 111, four, to be known
as eCouncil members at_ large, are to be nominated by eligible electors of the eCity at= large,
and three, to be known as district eCouncil members, are to be nominated by eligible
electors of their respective districts. The purpose of district divisions is to ensure City-wide
geographic repreientatiQ M the Council. All eCouncil members shall be elected by the
qualified electors of the eCity at -large. (Ord. 85-3273,12-17-1985)
ection 2.02. Division Into Council Districts.
The eCouncil, by ordinance, shall divide the eCity into three eCouncil districts of
substantially equal population. These districts are to be designated as eCouncil dDistrict A,
eCouncil Qistrict B, and eCouncil dDistrict C. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 2.03. Eligibility.
To be eligible to be elected to and to retain a eCouncil position, a person must be an eligible
elector of Iowa City, and if seeking or elected to represent a eCouncil district, must be an
eligible elector of that eCouncil district (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
Section 2.04. Terms.
At the first election under this eCharter, all seven eCouncil members are to be elected; the
eCouncil_member from ECouncil dDistrict A, eCouncil dDistrict C, and the two eCouncil
members at --large who receive the greatest number of votes cast for eCouncil member at -
large are to serve for terms of four years, and other eCouncil members are to serve for
terms of two years. Commencing at the next regular eCity election, and at all subsequent
regular eCity elections, all eCouncil members elected to fill the positions of those whose
terms expire shall be elected for terms of four years. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Page 5
The following is a clean copy of the wer-kin-g-droft of proposed amendments as of NeYeM4
25December 17, 2024 to the Iowa Citv Charter by the Charter Review Commission. T-4e
��issfe��s� �r�a�iaed- prey �� fiset�t-ia�ee�e�le�e�$�e �ie�t-re
Section 2.05. Compensation,
The ECouncil, by ordinance, shall prescribe the compensation of the e}Mayor and the other
ECouncil members. The eCouncil shall not adopt such an ordinance during the months of
November and December immediately following a regular ECity election. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-
1-2005)
Section 2.06. Mayor.
A. Immediately following the beginning of the terms of eCouncil members elected at the
regular ECity election, the ECouncil shall meet and elect from among its members the
FoM.ayor and tnMayor pPro ETem for a term of two years. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985)
B. The mMayor is a voting member of the eCouncil, the official representative of the
ECity, presiding officer of the ECouncil and its policy spokesperson. The fRMlayor may add
items to the ECity e Council agenda. The mMayor shall present to the ECity no later than
February 28 an annual sState of the ECity message. (Ord. 1S-4621, 5-19-201S)
C. The RMayor pPro STem shall act as FAMayor during the absence of the R+Mayor. (Ord.
85-3227, 3-12-1985)
Sgctlon 2.07, General Powers Aand Duties.
All powers of the ECity are vested in the ECouncil, except as otherwise provided by state
law or this c-Charter. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-198S)
Section 2.08- Appointments.
A. The ECouncil shall appoint the ECity fnManager.
B. The ECouncil shall appoint the ECity EClerk. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-198S)
C. The ECouncil shall appoint the eCity. aAttorney. (Ord. 95-3671, 3-28-199S)
_D. The City Manager shall appoint the Chief of the Police Department and the Chief of the
Fire Department subject to approval of the Gk*Council.
D.E. The ECouncil shall appoint all members of the eCity's boards, except as otherwise
provided by state law. (Ord. 8S-3227, 3-12-1985)
fiE. The ECouncil shall fix the amount of compensation, if any, of persons it appoints and
shall provide For the method of compensation of other ECity employees. All appointments
and promotions of ECity employees by c4 **eA--7tF4ctrv+anager-must be made
Page 6
The followina is a clean copy ofthg we ,draft obroposed amendments as oLNgve 4:
Mecemher 17, 2024 to the Iowa QU Charter by the Charter Review Commission. -T4w
C•��issi�#r�s ��#eal};�€f� �s{�se•r•a�a•1��seE�t�e•��w�e�e� st�Ete
according to job -related criteria and be consistent with nondiscriminatory and equal
employment opportunity standards established pursuant to law. (Ord. 95-3671, 3-28-
1995)
Section 2,09. Rules; Records.
The ECouncil may determine its own rules and shall maintain records of its proceedings
consistent with state law. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 2.10. Vacancies.
The eCouncil shall fill a vacancy occurring in an elective ECity office as provided by state
law. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
Section 2.11. Council Action,
Passage of an ordinance, amendment or resolution requires a majority vote of all the
members of the ECouncil except as otherwise provided by state law. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-
2005)
Section 2.12. Prohibitions.
A. A ECouncilmember may not hold any other eCity office or be a ECity employee or
elected county official while serving on the ECouncil nor hold any remunerated ECity office
or employment for at least one year after leaving the ECouncil. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
B—�Ali�r�e•��e�t+er�af tl�e+;att�►enE�tkefl�iefef�pal+ee�e�a�tn}e�Ea�•c-hie:
sf t#e i�depat, �=l�;�k� eres�bje��e ��f-av�efx�e�+-esu�+l;-�eia:kreFfl��+�
�+t�-�e�13eFs n3ay di�ate-mot �-may �k��p�ae�la�-�e�erFaka€��e�sat3
an gei *IewreveF;44 cow nc-if mad` ems-+ts-views-tet#e-eity
s�ae�e�aiegts-Ek���t�errE�-feme+:al•$fs•uc#��yee- f
298y4-With the exception of powers provided in Section 2.08. a Council member may DOL
dictate. in any manner. the appointment or removal of any City employee. However, the
Council may express its views is tkea�tie;aeta�i pea+ te+#epte?ae�
pertaining to the appointment or removal of such employee to
the Council appointee underwhom the employee works.(City Manager. City Attorney
Clerk .
Page 7
The following i.g a cigar cony of the w944g-drnft 0groposed amendments as of A6e� ief
agDecemher 17. 20Z4 to the Iowa City Charter Ay the Charter Review Commission.
C. AEetitea�laee�eilae+s+s s�itie a€a �e�ssa
ap"iated-by ertieEa t elef ecity aaage�:{A -fib- -� .9.Cn_uncil
member may not interfere with the supervision or direction of any City employee other
than the City Manager, City Attorney_. or City Clerk.
ARTICLE III. NOMINATION, PRIMARY ELECTION AND REGULAR ELECTION
Section 3.01. Nomination.
A. An eligible elector of a ECouncil district may become a candidate for a ECouncil district
seat by filing with the Johnson County ECommissioner of eElections a valid petition
requesting that k6--&F4+eF-their name be placed on the ballot for that office. Unless
otherwise provided by state law, the petition must be filed not more than eighty-five (85)
days nor k-s&-fewer than sixty-eight (68) days before the date of the election. Unless
otherwise provided by state law, the petition must be signed by eligible electors from the
candidate's district equal in number to at least two (2) percent of those who voted to fill
the same office at the last regular eCity election, but not le-,-,fewer-than ten (10) persons.
B. An eligible elector of the eCity may become a candidate for an at -large eCouncil seat by
filing with the Johnson County ECommissioner of eElections a petition requesting that the
candidate's name be placed on the ballot for that office. Unless otherwise provided by state
law, the petition must be filed not more than eighty-five (85) days nor fewer than
sixty-eight (68) days before the date of the election. Unless otherwise provided by state
law, the petition must be signed by eligible electors equal in number to at least two (2)
percent of those who voted to fill the same office at the last regular ECity election, but not
k� fewer than ten (10) persons. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 3.02. Primary Election.
A. If there are more than two candidates for a ECouncil district seat, a primary election
must be held for that seat with only the qualified electors of that ECouncil district eligible to
vote. The names of the two candidates who receive the highest number of votes in the
primary election are to be placed on the ballot for the regular eCity election as candidates
for that ECouncil seat. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
B. If there are more than twice as many candidates as there are at large positions to be
filled, there shall be a primary election held unless the ECouncil, by ordinance, chooses to
have a run -off -election. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985)
Page 8
Thg following is o clean copy of the we�iaadroft of proposed amendments as o X9
2SDecember 17, 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. Ae
Section 3.03. Regular City Election.
A. In the regular eCity election, each eCouncil district seat up for election shall be listed
separately on the ballot and only the names of candidates nominated from that ECouncil
district shall be listed on the ballot as candidates for that seat. However, all qualified
electors of the ECity shall be entitled to vote for each candidate. The three ECouncil district
seats shall be designated on the ballot as ECouncil dDistrict A, ECouncil dDistrict B and
ECouncil dDistrict C and each shall be elected at --large.
B. The at_ large ECouncil seats shall be designated on the ballot as such. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-
12-1985)
ARTICLE IV. CITY MANAGER
Section 4.01. Appointment: Qualifications.
In appointing a ECity fnManager, the ECouncil shall consider only the qualifications and
fitness of the person without regard to political or other affiliation. During 4per-4e*-their
tenure the eCity mNlanager shall reside within the eCity. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
Section 4.02. Accountability: Removal.
A. The eCity f4lanager is under the direction and supervision of the eCouncil and holds
office at its pleasure. A eCity fn anager removed by the eCouncil is entitled to receive
termination pay as provided by contract. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
B. Upon the resignation or removal of the eCity e3Manager, the eCouncil shall appoint an
individual qualified to perform the duties of eCity mManager to serve at the pleasure of
eCouncil or until a eCity fnManager is appointed. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
Section 4.03. Absence: Disability Qof City Manager.
The eCity fWanager may designate a qualified eCity employee as acting eCity faManager to
perform ljisaf-#eFth_e r duties during a temporary absence or disability. If the EGty
FaManager does not make such a designation, the eCouncil shall appoint a qualified eCity
employee to perform the duties of the eCity ffkManager until he,ae4e-t gy returns. (Ord.
76-2792,1-2-1976)
Page 9
The following is a clean copy of the we,-k tdraft oFlroposed amendments as of Atee e
ZSDecember 17, 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission.
��ss� ��e� delired-N�a�sa�c�i-peteri�ee�ee�e�s�e�+ �s
Section 4.04. Duties 9of City Manager.
A. The FCity ff�lvlanager shall be chief administrative officer of the FCity and shall;
{11} }ffsuffEnsure that the laws of the FCity are executed and enforced.
{2.3 Supervise and direct the administration of c-City government and the official
conduct of employees of the FCity appointed by the FCity Manager including their
employment, training, reclassification, suspension, or discharge as the occasion requires,
subject to state law.
(3.) Appoint the FChief of the pEolice dDepartment and the FChief of the Wire
Department with the approval of the FCity cCouncil.
{4,} Supervise the FChief of the pQolice dDepartment and FChief of the €fire
dDepartment, including their suspension or discharge as the occasion requires. Such
supervision shall not be subject to approval of the FCity ECouncil.
{5_} Appoint or employ persons to occupy positions for which no other method of
appointment is provided by state law or this ECharter.
{6_} Supervise the administration of the c-City personnel system, including the
determination of the compensation of all c-City employees appointed by the c-City
mManager subject to state larwthis Code or this cCharter
f7,4 Supervise the performance of all contracts for work to be done for the FCity,
supervise all purchases of materials and supplies, and assure that such materials and
supplies are received and are of specified quality and character.
{8_} Supervise and manage all public improvements, works and undertakings of the
<ity, and all c-City-owned property including buildings, plants, systems, and enterprises,
and have charge of their construction, improvement, repair, and maintenance except where
otherwise provided by state law.
{9_4 Supervise the making and preservation of all surveys, maps, plans, drawings,
specifications and estimates for the c-City.
{10_} Provide for the issuance and revocation of licenses and permits authorized by
state law or eCity ordinance and cause a record thereof to be maintained.
{11_} Prepare and submit to the cCouncil the annual budgets in the form prescribed
by state law.
{12_} Provide the cCouncil an itemized written monthly financial report.
{13:} Attend ECouncil meetings and keep the cCouncil fully advised of the financial
and other conditions of the <ity and its needs.
Page 10
The following is a clears copvofthe wer-ki2t.-draft of prom-sed amendments as of XfWemheF
2USDecember 17, 2024 to the lows City Charter by the Charter- Review Commission Tk
C-ee�iie�r-bss��ali�� ash a� s�1-�eteet� sflaera�me�� ��e
e -
{14=} See that the business affairs of the eCity are transacted in an efficient manner
and that accurate records of all eCity business are maintained and made available to the
public, except as otherwise provided by state law.
{15,} Provide necessary and reasonable clerical, research, and professional
assistance to boards within limitations of the budget.
{16,} Perform such other and further duties as the eCouncil may direct. (Ord. 05-
4152, 3-1-2005)
B. The eCity mManager, in performing the foregoing duties, may:
{1j Present recommendations and programs to the eCouncil and participate in any
discussion by the eCouncil of any matters pertaining to the duties of the eCity mmanager.
{2,} Cause the examination and investigation of the affairs of any department or the
conduct of any employee under supervision of the eCity faM.anager.
{3,} Execute contracts on behalf of the eCity when authorized by the eCouncil. (Ord.
85-3227, 3-12-1985)
Section 4.05. lneligibiliW: Prohibited Acts,
Except for the exercise of the right to vote, the eCity FAManager shall not take part in any
election of cCouncil members. This prohibition shall in no way limit the eCity mManager's
duty to make available public records as provided by state law or this ECharter. (Ord. 76-
2792,1-2-1976)
ARTICLE V. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Section 5.01. Establishment.
A. With the exception of the ECommunity $Rolice FReview bBoard, the cCouncil may
establish boards in addition to those required by state law and shall specify the title, duties,
length of term, qualifications of members and other appropriate matters. The Council shall
consider the available denioeranhics of board and commission members and avolicants in
makinE the4aanaintments in an effort to make annointments reflective of the community.
The eCouncil may reduce or increase a board's duties, transfer duties from one board to
another or dissolve any board, except as otherwise provided by state law or this c-Charter.
B. There shall be a permanent c-Community p !olice FReview Hoard, which shall have
vested in it the following minimum powers:
Page 11
The foI/awina is a clean copy of the ear-kinwadraft of proposed amendments as ofA4wem ap
2-SDecember 17. 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Chat -ter Review Commission. The
�►rx�i3siea'�-� lined -the p�s�ssl-Frr�ca�l► �ie�t���e#�a��ebieeE-tom
1. To hold at least one community forum each year for the purpose of hearing views on
the policies, practices, and procedures of the Iowa City p olice dDepartment;-and
2. To make recommendations regarding such policies, practices, and procedures to the
eCity eCouncil; and
3. To investigate claims of misconduct by sworn police officers and to issue
independent reports of its findings to the sCity eCouncil; and
4. The authority to subpoena witnesses. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 5.02. Appointment. Removal.
The eCouncil shall, subject to the requirements of state law, seek to provide broad
representation on all boards. The eCouncil shall establish procedures to give at least thirty
days' notice of vacancies before they are filled and shall encourage applications by
residents. Council procedures for the removal of members shall be consistent with state
law. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005; amd. Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 5.03. Rules.
A. The eCouncil shall establish rules and procedures for the operation of all boards,
which must include but are not limited to, the adoption of by-laws and rules pertaining to
open meetings and open records. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
B. The eCouncil shall specify, for each board, methods for informal and formal
communication with eCouncil, time schedules for the completion of reports requested by
eCouncil and such rules as it deems appropriate.
C. A board may establish additional rules and procedures that are consistent with state
law, eCouncil rules, and this eCharter. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
ARTICLE VI. CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES
Section 6.01, Limitations Aon Tthe Amount Oof Campaign Contributions.
The eCouncil, by ordinance, shall prescribe limitations on the amount of campaign
contributions made to a candidate for election to ECouncil by a person as defined in this
eCharter. (Ord. 95-3671, 3-28-1995)
Page 12
The following is a clean covyof the weEkdraft 4f proposed amendments as of"vOP4
2-5December 17, 0024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter- Review Commission. The
Section 6.02. Disclosure 9of Contributions Aand Expenditure$.
The ECouncil, by ordinance, may prescribe procedures requiring the disclosure of the
amount, source and kind of contributions received and expenditures made by (1) each
candidate for election to ECouncil and (2) any and all other persons, for the purpose of
aiding or securing the candidate's nomination or election. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
Section 6.03. Definition.
Within this article "contribution" shall be defined as that term is defined in chapter 68A
("campaign finance") of the ECode of Iowa. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005; amd. Ord. 15-4621, 5-
19-2015)
Section 6.04. Violations.
The sCouncil, by ordinance, shall prescribe: (1) penalties for the violation of the
contribution limitations and disclosure requirements it establishes pursuant to this
sSection; and (2) when appropriate, conditions for the revocation of a candidate's right to
serve on ECouncil if elected, consistent with state law. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
ARTICLE VII. INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM
Section 7.01. General Provisions.
A. Authority.
{1,} Initiative. The eligible electors have the right to propose measures to the
ECouncil and, if the eCouncil fails to adopt a measure so proposed without any change in
substance, to have the measure submitted to the voters at an election.
{2,} Referendum. The eligible electors have the right to require reconsideration by
the ECouncil of an existing measure and, if the ECouncil fails to repeal such measure, to have
it submitted to the voters at an election.
{3j Definition. Within this article, "measure" means all ordinances, amendments,
resolutions or motions of a legislative nature, however designated, which (a) are of a
permanent rather than temporary character and (b) include a proposition enacting,
amending or repealing a new or existing law, policy or plan, as opposed to one providing
for the execution or administration of a law, policy or plan already enacted by ECouncil.
B. Limitations.
Page 13
The fgllowing is a clean cogy of the w94i4i-g4rorr of proposed amendments as of Mava-M&-4
24December 17. 2024 to the Iowa ON Charter by the Charter Review Commission. The
C�r�i�sfexr #e�-�l�a�i�l {#epF�poce�-er+de�lpa�i�as►�e�d�e� �e-��c-�Fe
{1,4 Subject Matter. The right of initiative and referendum shall not extend to any of
the following:
fah Any measure of an executive or administrative nature, including, but not
limited to. RPrsonnel decisions.
{b,4 The eCity budget.
{c,4 The appropriation of money.
{d.4 The levy of taxes or special assessments,
fe_4 The issuance of general obligation and revenue bonds.
ff_3 The letting of contracts.
{g.) Salaries of eCity employees.
fh.4 Any measure required to be enacted by state or federal law.
fi_4 Amendments to this eCharter.
fj,4 Amendments affecting the eCity zoning ordinance or the land use maps of the
comprehensive plan, including the district plan maps.
fk,) Public improvements subsequent to ECityeCouncil action to authorize
acquisition of property for that public improvement, or notice to bidders for that public
improvement, whichever occurs earlier. "Public improvement" shall mean any building or
construction work.
{2.4 Resubmission. No initiative or referendum petition shall be filed within two
years after the same measure or a measure substantially the same has been submitted to
the voters at an election.
{3,4 Council Repeal, Amendment Ajand Reenactment. No measure proposed by
initiative petition and adopted by the vote of the sCouncil without submission to the voters,
or adopted by the voters pursuant to this article, may for two years thereafter be repealed
or amended except by a vote of the people, unless provision is otherwise made in the
original initiative measure. No measure referred by referendum petition and repealed by
the vote of the ecouncil without submission to the voters, or repealed by the voters
pursuant to this article, may be reenacted for two years thereafter except by vote of the
people, unless provision is otherwise made in the original referendum petition.
C. Construction.
{1,4 Scope 94f Power. It is intended that this article confer broad initiative and
referendum powers upon the eligible electors of the eCity.
Page 14
The following is a clean copy of the weAiaa-drag of proposed amendments as of Afaveswbec
24December 17, 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. The
{2J Initiative. It is intended that (a) no initiative petition will be invalid because it
repeals an existing measure in whole or in part by virtue of proposing a new measure and
(b) an initiative petition may amend an existing measure.
{3.1 Referendum. It is intended that a referendum petition may repeal a measure in
whole or in part.
D. Effect Aof Filing Petition. The filing of an initiative or referendum petition does not
suspend or invalidate any measure under consideration. Such measure shall remain in full
force and effect until its amendment or repeal by ECouncil pursuant to saection 7.05A or
until a majority of the qualified electors voting on a measure vote to repeal or amend the
measure and the vote is certified.
E. City Obligations. An initiative or referendum vote which repeals an existing measure
in whole or in part does not affect any obligations entered into by the EGty, its agencies or
any person in reliance on the measure during the time it was in effect. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-
2015)
Section 7.02. Commencement 9of Proceedings: Affidavit.
A. Commencement. One or more qualified electors, hereinafter referred to as the
"petitioners," may commence initiative or referendum proceedings by filing with the ECity
EClerk an affidavit stating they will supervise the circulation of the petition and will be
responsible for filing it in proper form, stating their names and addresses and specifying
the address to which all relevant notices are to be sent, and setting out in full the proposed
initiative measure or citing the measure sought to be reconsidered.
B. Affidavit. The ECity EClerk shall accept the affidavit for filing if on its face it appears to
have signatures of one or more qualified electors. The ECity EClerk shall issue the
appropriate petition forms to the petitioners the same day the affidavit is accepted for
filing. The ECity sClerk shall cause to be prepared and have available to the public, forms
and affidavits suitable for the commencement of proceedings and the preparation of
initiative and referendum petitions. (Ord. OS-4152, 3-1-2005)
Section 7.03. Petitions: Revocation Oof Signatures.
A. Number Aof Signatures. Initiative and referendum petitions must be signed by eligible
electors equal in number to at least ten percent (10%) of the number of persons who voted
Page 15
The following is a clean copy of the we5.ki9s drn ftof proposed amendments as of Alegi
25Qecember 17, 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission.
Ei�si��-� �ali;�et� ��pese�al6-��t�l-ame►es�t-s-�-3e�ect �e
in the last regular eCity election, but such signatures of eligible electors shall be no fewer
than ten. (Res.16-258, 8-29-2016] [November 2016 Special Election]
B. Form Agrid Content. All papers of a petition prepared for filing must be substantially
uniform in size and style and must be assembled as one instrument. Each person signing
shall provide, and the petition form shall provide space for, the signature, printed name,
address of the person signing and the date the signature is executed. Petitions prepared for
circulation must contain or have attached thereto throughout their circulation the full text
of the measure proposed or sought to be reconsidered. The petition filed with the sCity
eClerk need have attached to it only one copy of the measure being proposed or referred.
C. Affidavit Opf Circulator. Each paper of a petition containing signatures must have
attached to it when filed an affidavit executed by an eligible elector certifying: the number
of signatures on the paper, that 4e434:-4iL--thft-the elector personally circulated it, that all
signatures were affixed in 4isar4-L�the4-r--the elector's presence, that 4ie-OF.-&�t4 lbs
elector believers them to be genuine signatures of the persons whose names they purport
to be and that each signer had an opportunity before signing to read the full text of the
measure proposed or sought to be reconsidered. Any person filing a false affidavit will be
liable to criminal penalties as provided by state law.
D. Time Xor Filing Initiative Petitions. Signatures on an initiative petition must be
secured and the petition filed within six months after the date the affidavit required under
sSection 7.02A was filed.
E. Time Ffor Filing Referendum Petitions. Referendum petitions maybe filed within sixty
days after final adoption by the c-Council of the measure sought to be reconsidered, or
subsequently at any time more than two years after such final adoption. The signatures on
a referendum petition must be secured during the sixty days after such final adoption;
however, if the petition is filed more than two years after final adoption, the signatures
must be secured within six months after the date the affidavit required under &Section
7.02A was filed.
F. Revocation Oaf Signature. Prior to the time a petition is filed with the eCity eClerk, a
signatory may revoke W&-af-4er--jhgjr signature for any reason by filing with the eCity
eClerk a statement of his-ep4w-r-t ei intent to revoke his•iw-hei=their signature. After
petition is filed a signatory may not revoke his oF �hsrth it signature. The c-City EClerk shall
cause to be prepared and have available to the public, forms suitable for the revocation of
petition signatures. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015]
Section 7.04. Procedure Aafter Filing
Page 16
The following is a clean co pv of the wer-kihz-draft o f proposed amendments as ofN0V-- 3kef
25Decemhgr I7. 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission.
A. Validity Qcgf Ag Petition. A petition is valid if it contains the minimum required
signatures by eligible electors in the required form and with the required content and
accompanied by the affidavit of circulator as set forth in ,Section 7.03. The petition shall be
examined by the eCity eClerk before it is accepted for filing. If the petition appears valid on
its face it shall be accepted for filing. If it lacks the required number of signatures it shall be
considered invalid and returned to the petitioners. Petitions which have been accepted for
filing are valid unless written objections are filed with the eCity eClerk within five working
days after the petition is received.
B. Hearing Gon Objections; Objections Committee. Written objections timely filed with
the eCity eClerk shall be considered by an objections committee made up of the mmayor
and eCity eClerk and one member of the ,Council chosen by the ,Council by ballot, and a
majority decision shall be final. The hearing on the objections shall be held within ten days
of receipt of the objections.
C. Court Review. To the extent allowed by law, court review of the ,Objections
,Committee's actions shall be by writ of certiorari. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 7.05. Action Aon Petitions.
A. Action 9 y Council. When an initiative or referendum petition has been determined
valid, the ,Council shall promptly consider the proposed initiative measure or reconsider
the referred measure. If the ,Council fails to adopt a proposed initiative measure and fails
to adopt a measure which is similar in substance within sixty days, or if the ECouncil fails to
repeal the referred measure within thirty days after the date the petition was finally
determined valid, it shall submit the proposed or referred measure to the qualified electors
of the EC:ity as hereinafter prescribed. If at any time more than thirty days before a
scheduled initiative or referendum election the ,Council adopts the proposed initiative
measure or adopts a measure which is similar in substance or if the eCouncil repeals a
referred measure, the initiative or referendum proceedings shall terminate and the
proposed or referred measure shall not be submitted to the voters.
B. Submission Tto Voters.
—(IJ Initiative. If required by this section. Tt e vote of the eCity on a proposed
measure shall be held at the 44 F1ekE
ecgt:s-first le ap l!y oerniissible election dare -more than forty days after the expiration of
the sixty day period provided for consideration in sSection 7.05A, provided that the
initiative petition was filed no k-,-,fewer than 80 days prior to the deadline imposed by
state law for the submission of ballot questions to the ,Commissioner of eElections.
-f2_) Referendum. I f required by this section. Tthe vote of the eCity on a referred
measure shall be held at the ft3' elec-�ieq er-at teal eleFEie+� aekt
oeg+fs•first legally nermissible election date more than forty days after the expiration of
Page 17
The following is a clean copv of the aster-kiae draft o f propased amendments as of k1eveffl#eE
29Dece►nber z 7.2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. Ae
issienot
liee tE$esa�11ettaeraceas�siieet�a
Ehffnaa-
the thirty day period provided for reconsideration in sEection 7.05A, provided that the
referendum petition was filed no less -fewer than 50 days prior to the deadline imposed by
state law forthe submission of ballot questions to the eCommissioner of eElections. The
ECouncil may provide for a special referendum election on a referred measure any time
more than 120 days after the filing of the referendum petition with the sCity EClerk.
C. Ballot. Copies of the proposed or referred measure shall be made available to the
qualified electors at the polls and shall be advertised at the <ity's expense in the manner
required for "questions" in section 376.5 of the Iowa Code. The subject matter and purpose
of the referred or proposed measure shall be indicated on the ballot. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-
2015)
Section 7.06. Results Qof Election.
A. Initiative. If a majority of the qualified electors voting on a proposed initiative
measure vote in its favor, it shall be considered adopted upon certification of the election
results. The adopted measure shall be treated in all respects in the same manner as
measures of the same kind adopted by the ECouncil, except as provided in sEection
7.01B(3). If conflicting measures are approved by majority vote at the same election, the
one receiving the greatest number of affirmative votes shall prevail to the extent of such
conflict.
B. Referendum. If a majority of the qualified electors voting on a referred measure vote
in favor of repealing the measure, it shall be considered repealed upon certification of the
election results. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 7.07. Prohibition Pon Establishment Laof Stricter Conditions Por Requirements.
The ECouncil shall not set, except by eCharter amendment, conditions or requirements
affecting initiative and referendum. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
ARTICLE VIII. CHARTER AMENDMENTS AND REVIEW
Section 8.01. Charter Amendments.
This eCharter may be amended only by one of the following methods:
A. The ECouncil, by resolution, may submit a proposed amendment to the voters at the
Lir:9 legally.oermissible elecri-i n date consistent with Section 7.05f Bl of this Charters
Page 18
The fallowing is o clean
copy of the w944g
draft ofproposed amendments
as of Asyem4er-
2-SO-ecember I Z 2024 to
the Iowa City
Charter by the Charter Review
Commission. The
L-'e�xiissdc�-��{��li�!
��e{3s��1-Pet�tia!'
�ae►ul�ea��e
s
speEial city elerisra, and the proposed amendment becomes effective when approved by a
majority of those voting.
B. The eCouncil, by ordinance, may amend the eCharter. However, within thirty (30) days
of publication of the ordinance, if a petition valid under the provisions of section 362.4 of
the ECode of Iowa is filed with the eCouncil, the re -Council must submit the amending
ordinance to the voters at the first legally permissible election date consistent with Section
7,OSCB1 of this Chartera-spe l•gjjaLeleetian, and the amendment does not become effective
until approved by a majority of those voting.
C. Petitions.
1. Action by Council. If a petition valid under the provisions of section 362.4 of the
ECode of Iowa is filed with the eCouncil proposing an amendment to the ECharter, the
Council shall promptly consider the proposed amendment. if the Council fails to adogt a
proposed amendment which is similar in substance within sixty days. it shall submit the
proposed amendment to the qualified electors of the City as hereinafter prescribed. If at
any time more than thirty days before the scheduled election the Council adapts 2
profosed amendment which is similar in substance. the amendment proceedings shall
terminate and the proposed amendment shall not be submitted to the voters.
2. Amendment. if required by this section. the vote of the City on the proposed
pry endmentshall be held, t4ecettaFil st tf e$e 2 ae to-N �2�e+s
at the First legally permissible election date consistent with Section 7:r'� 8-01MI110�
this Charter-,+-. e;e} i electien, and the amendment becomes effective if approved by a
majority of those voting. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
4-3, Ballot. Coj2ies of the proposed amendment shall be made available to the
qualified electors at the polls and shall be advertised at the Cit 's expense in the manner
required for "questions" in section 376.5 of the Iowa Code. The subject matter and purpose
of the proposed amendment shall be indicated on the ballot.
Section 8.02. Charter Review Commission.
The eCouncil, using the procedures prescribed in aArticle V, shall establish a ECharter
egeview eCommission at least once every ten years following the effective date of this
eCharter. The eCommission, consisting of at least nine members, shall review the existing
eCharter and may, within twelve months recommend any eCharter amendments that it
deems fit to the eCouncil. The eCouncil shall either exercise its power of amendment
pursuant to sSection 8.01B of the (Charter on a matter recommended by the ECommission
or submit such amendments to the voters in the form prescribed by the ECommission, and
an amendment becomes effective when approved by a majority of those voting. (Ord. 05-
4152, 3-1-2005)
Page 19
The following is a clean copy of the war-Lsng-draft of proposed amendments as of Neyera e�
23December 17.2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. The
6��isstef�-#�s�-��pA;s�t+ra��! �ia��e�r�►e�ere-s��e
CHARTER COMPARATIVE TABLE
The #Home r-Rule charter is set out in this volume as adopted by the voters on November
15,1973, and by ordinance 76-2792, on January 2, 1976. The following table shows the
disposition of amendments to the eCharter:
Ordinance Date Disposition
Number
77-2826
3-15-
6.01
1977
77-2858
9-6-
7.0513
1977
77-2864
9-6-
3.01
1977
85-3227
3-12-
Definitions 7,8, 2.01, 2.03, 2.05 - 2.08, 3.01- 3.03, 4.04, 5.02,
1985
6.04, 7.01- 7.05, 8.01, 8.02
85-3228
3-12-
6.02
1985
85-3273
12-17-
2.01
1985
90-3462
6-26-
7.03A, 7.04A
1990
95-3671
3-28-
2.0613, 2.08C,E, 3.01A, 6.01, 7.04D
1995
Page 20
The following is o clean coly of the we44;adra ttoofproposed amendments as of Nevem
240ecember 17, 2024 to the Iowa City Charter by the Charter Review Commission. e
�c��s:awes-�{t�ali�ed-�osef��l�-h+at-eflz��e��aea�a� s��eEts
05-4152
3-1-
Definitions 11,12, 2.03, 2.05, 2.11, 2.1213, 3.01A, 3.02A, 4.04A,
2005
5.02, 5.03A, 6,02, 6.03, 6.04, 7.01, 7,02, 7,03B,C,E, 7.04A,B,C,
7.05, 7.06, 8.01, 8.02
Res.07-262
8-31-
5.01
2007
15-4621
5-19-
Preamble, 2.0613, 3.01, 4.02A, 5.01, 5.02, 6.03, 7.01, 7.03, 7.04,
2015
7.05, 7.06, 7.07
Petition
11-
7.03A
2016
Page 21
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
IOWA CITY CHARTER 1
Preamble
Definitions
Article I. Powers of the City
§ 1.01. Powers of the City.
§ 1.02. Construction.
§ 1.03. Savings Clause.
Article II. City Council
§ 2.01. Composition.
§ 2.02. Division into Council Districts.
§ 2.03. Eligibility.
§ 2.04. Terms.
§ 2.05. Compensation.
§ 2.06. Mayor.
§ 2.07. General Powers and Duties.
§ 2.08. Appointments.
§ 2.09. Rules; Records.
§ 2.10. Vacancies.
§ 2.11. Council Action.
§ 2.12. Prohibitions.
Article III. Nomination, Primary Election and Regular Election
§ 3.01. Nomination.
§ 3.02. Primary Election.
§ 3.03. Regular City Election.
Article IV. City Manager
§ 4.01. Appointment; Qualifications.
§ 4.02. Accountability; Removal.
§ 4.03. Absence; Disability of City Manager.
Page 1
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
§ 4.04. Duties of City Manager.
§ 4.05. Ineligibility; Prohibited Acts.
Article V. Boards, Commissions and Committees
§ 5.01. Establishment.
§ 5.02. Appointment; Removal.
§ 5.03. Rules.
Article VI. Campaign Contributions and Expenditures
§ 6.01. Limitations on the Amount of Campaign Contributions.
§ 6.02. Disclosure of Contributions and Expenditures.
§ 6.03. Definition.
§ 6.04. Violations.
Article VII. Initiative and Referendum
§ 7.01. General Provisions.
§ 7.02. Commencement of Proceedings, Affidavit.
§ 7.03. Petitions; Revocation of Signatures.
§ 7.04. Procedure after Filing.
§ 7.05. Action on Petitions.
§ 7.06. Results of Election.
§ 7.07. Prohibition on Establishment of Stricter Conditions or Requirements.
Article VIII. Charter Amendments and Review
§ 8.01. Charter Amendments.
§ 8.02. Charter Review Commission.
Notes
1 1. The home rule Charter of the City, adopted by the voters of the City on November
15,1973, and by ordinance 76-2792 on January 2, 1976, pursuant to I.C.A. section
372.9, is set out herein as adopted and amended.
Page 2
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
PREAMBLE
We, the people of Iowa City, Iowa, pursuant to the constitution and statutes of the State of
Iowa and the principle of self-determination, proclaim that the government of Iowa City
belongs to all its residents and all share the responsibility for it. We hereby adopt this
Charter and confer upon it the full home rule powers of a charter city in order to provide
for an honest and accountable council-manager government. By this action, we secure the
benefits of home rule and affirm the values of representative democracy, professional
management, strong leadership, public engagement, diversity and inclusiveness, regional
cooperation, and stewardship of our unique environment. Furthermore, adoption of this
Charter recognizes the following principles:
1. Resident participation on an equitable and inclusive basis as part of the process of
democratic self-government.
a. Each individual shall have an opportunity to participate in the life of the City,
including economic, cultural and intellectual.
b. Discrimination prohibited by Title 2 of the City Code shall not be tolerated.
2. The provision of service relating to the health, safety, and welfare of its residents in
a fair, equitable and efficient manner.
3. The conduct of City business in conformity with the principles and practices of due
process, equal protection under the laws, and protection of individual liberties granted by
the Constitution of the United States, bythe State of Iowa, and by local ordinances.
4. Civility and responsiveness by City employees in their interactions with the public.
(Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
DEFINITIONS
As used in this Charter:
1. "City" means the City of Iowa City, Iowa.
2. "City Council" or "Council' means the governing body of the City.
3. "Council member" means a member of the Council, including the Mayor.
4. "Shall" imposes a duty.
5. "Must" states a requirement.
6. "May" confers a power.
7. "Eligible elector" means a person eligible to register to vote in Iowa City.
8. "Qualified elector" means a resident of Iowa City who is registered to vote in Iowa
C ity.
Page 3
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
9. "Board" includes aboard, commission, committee or other similar entity however
designated.
10. "Person" means an individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association,
political party, committee or any other legal entity.
11. "Ordinance" means a city law of a general and permanent nature.
12. "Measure", except as provided in Article VII, means an ordinance, amendment,
resolution or motion. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976; amd. Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985; Ord. 05-
4152, 3-1-2005)
ARTICLE I. POWERS OF THE CITY
Section 1.01. Powers of the CiM.
The City shall have all powers possible under the constitution and laws of this state. (Ord.
76-2792,1-2-1976)
Section 1.02. Construction.
The grant of power to the City under this Charter is intended to be broad; the mention of a
specific power in this Charter is not intended to be a limitation on the general powers
conferred in this article. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
Section 1.03. Savings Clause.
If any provision of this Charter, or the application of this Charter to any person or
circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications
of this Charter. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
ARTICLE II. CITY COUNCIL
Section 2.01_ Composition
The City Council consists of seven members. As provided in Article III, four, to be known as
Council members at -large, are to be nominated by eligible electors of the City at -large, and
three, to be known as district Council members, are to be nominated by eligible electors of
their respective districts, The purpose of district divisions is to ensure City-wide
geographic representation on the Council. All Council members shall be elected by the
qualified electors of the City at -large. (Ord. 85-3273,12-17-1985)
Page 4
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
Section 2.02. Division Into Council Districts.
The Council, by ordinance, shall divide the City into three Council districts of substantially
equal population. These districts are to be designated as Council District A, Council District
B, and Council District C. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
Section 2.03. Eligibility.
To be eligible to be elected to and to retain a Council position, a person must be an eligible
elector of Iowa City, and if seeking or elected to represent a Council district, must be an
eligible elector of that Council district. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
Section 2.04. Terms
At the first election under this Charter, all seven Council members are to be elected; the
Council member from Council District A, Council District C, and the two Council members
at -large who receive the greatest number of votes cast for Council member at -large are to
serve for terms of four years, and other Council members are to serve for terms of two
years. Commencing at the next regular City election, and at all subsequent regular City
elections, all Council members elected to fill the positions of those whose terms expire shall
be elected for terms of four years. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 2.05. Compensation.
The Council, by ordinance, shall prescribe the compensation of the Mayor and the other
Council members. The Council shall not adopt such an ordinance during the months of
November and December immediately following a regular City election. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-
2005)
Section 2.06. Mayor.
A. Immediately following the beginning of the terms of Council members elected at the
regular City election, the Council shall meet and elect from among its members the Mayor
and Mayor Pro Tern for a term of two years. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985)
B. The Mayor is a voting member of the Council, the official representative of the City,
presiding officer of the Council and its policy spokesperson. The Mayor may add items to
the City Council agenda. The Mayor shall present to the City no later than February 28 an
annual State of the City message. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
C. The Mayor Pro Tern shall act as Mayor during the absence of the Mayor. (Ord. 85-
3227, 3-12-1985)
Section 2.07, General Powers and Duties.
All powers of the City are vested in the Council, except as otherwise provided by state law
or this Charter. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985)
Section 2.08. Aonointments.
A. The Council shall appoint the City Manager.
Page 5
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
B. The Council shall appoint the City Clerk. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985)
C. The Council shall appoint the City Attorney. (Ord. 95-3671, 3-28-1995)
D. The City Manager shall appoint the Chief of the Police Department and the Chief of the
Fire Department, subject to approval of the Council.
E. The Council shall appoint all members of the City's boards, except as otherwise
provided by state law. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985)
F. The Council shall fix the amount of compensation, if any, of persons it appoints and
shall provide for the method of compensation of other City employees. All appointments
and promotions of City employees must be made according to job -related criteria and be
consistent with nondiscriminatory and equal employment opportunity standards
established pursuant to law. (Ord. 95-3671, 3-28-1995)
Section 2.09. Rules: Records.
The Council may determine its own rules and shall maintain records of its proceedings
consistentwith state law. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 2.10. Vacancio.
The Council shall fill a vacancy occurring in an elective City office as provided by state law.
(Ord. 76-279Z,1-2-1976)
Section 2.11. Council Action.
Passage of an ordinance, amendmentor resolution requires a majorityvote of all the
members of the Council except as otherwise provided by state law. (Ord, OS-4152, 3-1-
2005)
Section 2.12. Prohibitions,
A. A Council member may not hold any other City office or be a City employee or elected
county official while serving on the Council nor hold any remunerated City office or
employment for at least one year after leaving the Council. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
B With the exception of powers provided in Section 2.08, a Council member may not
dictate, in any manner, the appointment or removal of any City employee. However, the
Council may express its views pertaining to the appointment or removal of such employee
to the Council appointee under whom the employee works:(City Manager, City Attorney,
City Clerk).
C. A Council member may not interfere with the supervision or direction of any City
employee other than the City Manager, City Attorney, or City Clerk.
Page 6
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
ARTICLE III. NOMINATION, PRIMARY ELECTION AND REGULAR ELECTION
Section 3.01. Nomination.
A. An eligible elector of a Council district may become a candidate for a Council district
seat by filing with the Johnson County Commissioner of Elections a valid petition
requesting that their name be placed on the ballot for that office. Unless otherwise
provided by state law, the petition must be filed not more than eighty-five (85) days nor
fewer than sixty-eight (68) days before the date of the election. Unless otherwise provided
by state law, the petition must be signed by eligible electors from the candidate's district
equal in number to at least two (2) percent of those who voted to fill the same office at the
last regular City election, but not fewer than ten (10) persons.
B. An eligible elector of the City may become a candidate for an at -large Council seat by
filing with the Johnson County Commissioner of Elections a petition requesting that the
candidate's name be placed on the ballot for that office. Unless otherwise provided by state
law, the petition must be filed not more than eighty-five (85) days nor fewer than sixty-
eight (68) days before the date of the election. Unless otherwise provided by state law, the
petition must be signed by eligible electors equal in number to at least two (2) percent of
those who voted to fill the same office at the last regular City election, but not fewer than
ten (10) persons. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 3.02. Primary Election.
A. If there are more than two candidates for a Council district seat, a primary election
must be held for that seat with only the qualified electors of that Council district eligible to
vote. The names of the two candidates who receive the highest number of votes in the
primary election are to be placed on the ballot for the regular City election as candidates
for that Council seat. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
B. If there are more than twice as many candidates as there are at large positions to be
filled, there shall be a primary election held unless the Council, by ordinance, chooses to
have a run-off election. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-12-1985)
Section 3.03. Reeular City Election.
A. In the regular City election, each Council district seat up for election shall be listed
separately on the ballot and only the names of candidates nominated from that Council
district shall be listed on the ballot as candidates for that seat. However, all qualified
electors of the City shall be entitled to vote for each candidate. The three Council district
seats shall be designated on the ballot as Council District A, Council District B and Council
District C and each shall be elected at -large.
B. The at -large Council seats shall be designated on the ballot as such. (Ord. 85-3227, 3-
12-1985)
Page 7
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
ARTICLE IV. CITY MANAGER
Section 4.01. Appointment: Qualifications.
In appointing a City Manager, the Council shall consider only the qualifications and fitness
of the person without regard to political or other affiliation. During their tenure the City
Manager shall reside within the City. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
Section 4.02. Accountability: Removal.
A. The City Manager is under the direction and supervision of the Council and holds
office at its pleasure. A City Manager removed by the Council is entitled to receive
termination pay as provided by contract. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
B. Upon the resignation or removal of the City Manager, the Council shall appoint an
individual qualified to perform the duties of City Manager to serve at the pleasure of
Council or until a City Manager is appointed. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 4.03. Absence: Disability of City Manager.
The City Manager may designate a qualified City employee as acting City Manager to
perform their duties during a temporary absence or disability. If the City Manager does not
make such a designation, the Council shall appoint a qualified City employee to perform the
duties of the City Manager until they return. (Ord. 76-2792, 1-2-1976)
Section 4.04. Duties of Ci , Manager.
A. The City Manager shall be chief administrative officer of the City and shall:
1. Ensure that the laws of the City are executed and enforced.
2. Supervise and direct the administration of City government and the official
conduct of employees of the City appointed by the City Manager including their
employment, training, reclassification, suspension, or discharge as the occasion requires,
subject to state law.
3. Appoint the Chief of the Police Department and the Chief of the Fire Department
with the approval of the City Council.
4. Supervise the Chief of the Police Department and Chief of the Fire Department,
including their suspension or discharge as the occasion requires. Such supervision shall not
be subject to approval of the City Council,
5. Appoint or employ persons to occupy positions for which no other method of
appointment is provided by state law or this Charter.
6, Supervise the administration of the City personnel system, including the
determination of the compensation of all City employees appointed by the City Manager
subject to this Code or this Charter.
Page 8
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
7. Supervise the performance of all contracts for work to be done for the City,
supervise all purchases of materials and supplies, and assure that such materials and
supplies are received and are of specified quality and character.
8. Supervise and manage all public improvements, works and undertakings of the
City, and all City -owned property including buildings, plants, systems, and enterprises, and
have charge of their construction, improvement, repair, and maintenance except where
otherwise provided by state law.
9. Supervise the making and preservation of all surveys, maps, plans, drawings,
specifications and estimates for the City.
10. Provide for the issuance and revocation of licenses and permits authorized by
state law or City ordinance and cause a record thereof to be maintained.
11. Prepare and submit to the Council the annual budgets in the form prescribed by
state law.
12. Provide the Council an itemized written monthly financial report.
13. Attend Council meetings and keep the Council fully advised of the financial and
other conditions of the City and its needs.
14. See that the business affairs of the City are transacted in an efficient manner and
that accurate records of all City business are maintained and made available to the public,
except as otherwise provided by state law.
15. Provide necessary and reasonable clerical, research, and professional assistance
to boards within limitations of the budget.
16. Perform such other and further duties as the Council may direct. (Ord. 05-4152,
3-1-2005)
B. The City Manager, in performing the foregoing duties, may:
1. Present recommendations and programs to the Council and participate in any
discussion by the Council of any matters pertaining to the duties of the City Manager.
2. Cause the examination and investigation of the affairs of any department or the
conduct of any employee under supervision of the City Manager.
3. Execute contracts on behalf of the City when authorized by the Council. (Ord. 85-
3227, 3-12-1985)
Section 4.05. Ineligibility: Prohibited Acts.
Except for the exercise of the right to vote, the City Manager shall not take part in any
election of Council members. This prohibition shall in no way limit the City Manager's duty
to make available public records as provided by state law or this Charter. (Ord. 76-2792,1-
2-1976)
Page 9
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
ARTICLE V. BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
Section 5.01. Establishment.
A. With the exception of the Community Police Review Board, the Council may establish
boards in addition to those required by state law and shall specify the title, duties, length of
term, qualifications of members and other appropriate matters. The Council shall consider
the available demographics of board and commission members and applicants in making
appointments in an effort to make appointments reflective of the community. The Council
may reduce or increase a board's duties, transfer duties from one board to another or
dissolve any board, except as otherwise provided by state law or this Charter.
B. There shall be a permanent Community Police Review Board, which shall have vested
in it the following minimum powers:
1. To hold at least one community forum each year for the purpose of hearing views
on the policies, practices, and procedures of the Iowa City Police Department; and
2. To make recommendations regarding such policies, practices, and procedures to
the City Council; and
3. To investigate claims of misconduct by sworn police officers and to issue
independent reports of its findings to the City Council; and
4. The authority to subpoena witnesses. (Ord.1S-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 5.02. Appointment: Removal.
The Council shall, subject to the requirements of state law, seek to provide broad
representation on all boards. The Council shall establish procedures to give at least thirty
days' notice of vacancies before they are filled and shall encourage applications by
residents. Council procedures for the removal of members shall be consistent with state
law. (Ord. OS-4152, 3-1-2005; amd. Ord.15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 5.03. Rules,
A. The Council shall establish rules and procedures for the operation of all boards, which
must includebut are not limited to, the adoption of by-laws and rules pertaining to open
meetings and open records. (Ord. OS-4152, 3-1-200S)
B. The Council shall specify, for each board, methods for informal and formal
communication with Council, time schedules for the completion of reports requested by
Council and such rules as it deems appropriate.
C. A board may establish additional rules and procedures that are consistent with state
law, Council rules, and this Charter. (Ord. 76-2792,1-2-1976)
Page 10
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
ARTICLE VI. CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES
Section 6,01. Limitations -()-n the Amount of Campaign Contributions.
The Council, by ordinance, shall prescribe limitations on the amount of campaign
contributions made to a candidate for election to Council by a person as defined in this
Charter. (Ord. 95-3671, 3-28-1995)
Section 6.02. Disclosure of Contributions -,and Expenditures.
The Council, by ordinance, may prescribe procedures requiring the disclosure of the
amount, source and kind of contributions received and expenditures made by (1) each
candidate for election to Council and (2) any and all other persons, for the purpose of
aiding or securing the candidate's nomination or election. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
Section 6.03. Definition.
Within this article "contribution" shall be defined as that term is defined in chapter 68A
("campaign finance") of the Code of Iowa. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005; amd. Ord.15-4621, 5-
19-2015)
Section 6.04. Violations.
The Council, by ordinance, shall prescribe: (1) penalties for the violation of the contribution
limitations and disclosure requirements it establishes pursuant to this Section; and (2)
when appropriate, conditions for the revocation of a candidate's right to serve on Council if
elected, consistent with state law. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
ARTICLE VII. INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM
Section 7.01. General Provisions.
A. Authority.
1. Initiative. The eligible electors have the right to propose measures to the Council
and, if the Council fails to adopt a measure so proposed without any change in substance, to
have the measure submitted to the voters at an election.
2. Referendum. The eligible electors have the right to require reconsideration by the
Council of an existing measure and, if the Council fails to repeal such measure, to have it
submitted to the voters at an election.
3. Definition. Within this article, "measure" means all ordinances, amendments,
resolutions or motions of a legislative nature, however designated, which (a) are of a
permanent rather than temporary character and (b) include a proposition enacting,
amending or repealing a new or existing law, policy or plan, as opposed to one providing
for the execution or administration of a law, policy or plan already enacted by Council.
Page 11
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
B. Limitations.
1. Subject Matter. The right of initiative and referendum shall not extend to any of
the following:
a. Any measure of an executive or administrative nature, including, but not
limited to, personnel decisions.
b. The City budget.
c. The appropriation of money.
d. The levy of taxes or special assessments.
e. The issuance of general obligation and revenue bonds.
f. The letting of contracts.
g. Salaries of City employees.
h. Any measure required to be enacted by state or federal law.
i. Amendments to this Charter.
j. Amendments affecting the City zoning ordinance or the land use maps of the
comprehensive plan, includingthe district plan maps.
k. Public improvements subsequent to City Council action to authorize
acquisition of property for that public improvement, or notice to bidders for that public
improvement, whichever occurs earlier. "Public improvement" shall mean any building or
construction work.
2. Resubmission. No initiative or referendum petition shall be filed within two years
after the same measure or a measure substantially the same has been submitted to the
voters at an election.
3. Council Repeal, Amendment and Reenactment. No measure proposed by initiative
petition and adopted by the vote of the Council without submission to the voters, or
adopted by the voters pursuant to this article, may for two years thereafter be repealed or
amended exceptby a vote of the people, unless provision is otherwise made in the original
initiative measure. No measure referred by referendum petition and repealed by the vote
of the Council without submission to the voters, or repealed by the voters pursuant to this
article, may be reenacted for two years thereafter except by vote of the people, unless
provision is otherwise made in the original referendum petition.
C. Construction.
1. Scope of Power. It is intended that this article confer broad initiative and
referendum powers upon the eligible electors of the City.
Page 12
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
2. Initiative. It is intended that (a) no initiative petition will be invalid because it
repeals an existing measure in whole or in part by virtue of proposing a new measure and
(b) an initiative petition may amend an existing measure.
3. Referendum. It is intended that a referendum petition may repeal a measure in
whole or in part.
D. Effect of Filing Petition. The filing of an initiative or referendum petition does not
suspend or invalidate any measure under consideration. Such measure shall remain in full
force and effect until its amendment or repeal by Council pursuant to Section 7.05A or until
a majority of the qualified electors voting on a measure vote to repeal or amend the
measure and the vote is certified.
E. City Obligations. An initiative or referendum vote which repeals an existing measure
in whole or in part does not affect any obligations entered into by the City, its agencies or
any person in reliance on the measure during the time it was in effect. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-
2015)
Section 7.02. Commencement of Proceedings: Affidavit_
A. Commencement. One or more qualified electors, hereinafter referred to as the
"petitioners," may commence initiative or referendum proceedings by filing with the City
Clerk an affidavit stating they will supervise the circulation of the petition and will be
responsible for filing it in proper form, stating their names and addresses and specifying
the address to which all relevant notices are to be sent, and setting out in full the proposed
initiative measure or citing the measure sought to be reconsidered.
B. Affidavit. The City Clerk shall accept the affidavit for filing if on its face it appears to
have signatures of one or more qualified electors. The City Clerk shall issue the appropriate
petition forms to the petitioners the same day the affidavit is accepted for filing. The City
Clerk shall cause to be prepared and have available to the public, forms and affidavits
suitable for the commencement of proceedings and the preparation of initiative and
referendum petitions. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
Section 7.03. Petitions: Revocation of Signatures.
A. Number of Signatures. Initiative and referendum petitions must be signed by eligible
electors equal in number to at least ten percent (10%) of the number of persons who voted
in the last regular City election, but such signatures of eligible electors shall be no fewer
than ten. (Res.16-258, 8-29-2016)[November 2016 Special Election]
B. Form and Content. All papers of a petition prepared for filing must be substantially
uniform in size and style and must be assembled as one instrument. Each person signing
shall provide, and the petition form shall provide space for, the signature, printed name,
address of the person signing and the date the signature is executed. Petitions prepared for
circulation must contain or have attached thereto throughout their circulation the full text
of the measure proposed or sought to be reconsidered. The petition filed with the City
Clerk need have attached to it only one copy of the measure being proposed or referred.
Page 13
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
C. Affidavit of Circulator. Each paper of a petition containing signatures must have
attached to it when filed an affidavit executed by an eligible elector certifying: the number
of signatures on the paper, that the elector personally circulated it, that all signatures were
affixed in the elector's presence, that the elector believes them to be genuine signatures of
the persons whose names they purport to be and that each signer had an opportunity
before signing to read the full text of the measure proposed or sought to be reconsidered.
Any person Filing a false affidavit will be liable to criminal penalties as provided by state
law.
D. Time for Filing Initiative Petitions. Signatures on an initiative petition must be secured
and the petition filed within six months after the date the affidavit required under Section
7.02A was filed.
E. Time for Filing Referendum Petitions. Referendum petitions may be filed within sixty
days after final adoption by the Council of the measure sought to be reconsidered, or
subsequently at any time more than two years after such final adoption. The signatures on
a referendum petition must be secured during the sixty days after such final adoption;
however, if the petition is filed more than two years after final adoption, the signatures
must be secured within six months after the date the affidavit required under Section 7.02A
was filed.
F. Revocation of Signature. Prior to the time a petition is filed with the City Clerk, a
signatory may revoke their signature for any reason by filing with the City Clerk a
statement of their intent to revoke their signature. After a petition is filed a signatory may
not revoke their signature. The City Clerk shall cause to be prepared and have available to
the public, forms suitable for the revocation of petition signatures. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-
2015)
Section 7.04. Procedure after Fiiine.
A. Validity of a Petition. A petition is valid if it contains the minimum required signatures
by eligible electors in the required form and with the required content and accompanied by
the affidavit of circulator as set forth in Section 7.03. The petition shall be examined by the
City Clerk before it is accepted for filing. If the petition appears valid on its face it shall be
accepted for filing. If it lacks the required number of signatures it shall be considered
invalid and returned to the petitioners. Petitions which have been accepted for filing are
valid unless written objections are filed with the City Clerk within five working days after
the petition is received.
B. Hearing on Objections; Objections Committee. Written objections timely filed with the
City Clerk shall be considered by an objections committee made up of the Mayor and City
Clerk and one member of the Council chosen by the Council by ballot, and a majority
decision shall be final. The hearing on the objections shall be held within ten days of receipt
of the objections.
C. Court Review. To the extent allowed bylaw, court review of the Objections
Committee's actions shall be by writ of certiorari. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Page 14
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
ection 7.05. Action on Petitions.
A. Action by Council. When an initiative or referendum petition has been determined
valid, the Council shall promptly consider the proposed initiative measure or reconsider
the referred measure. If the Council fails to adopt a proposed initiative measure and fails to
adopt a measure which is similar in substance within sixty days, or if the Council fails to
repeal the referred measure within thirty days after the date the petition was finally
determined valid, it shall submit the proposed or referred measure to the qualified electors
of the City as hereinafter prescribed. If at any time more than thirty days before a
scheduled initiative or referendum election the Council adopts the proposed initiative
measure or adopts a measure which is similar in substance or if the Council repeals a
referred measure, the initiative or referendum proceedings shall terminate and the
proposed or referred measure shall not be submitted to the voters.
B. Submission to Voters.
1. Initiative. If required by this section, the vote of the City on a proposed measure
shall be held at the first legally permissible election date more than forty days after the
expiration of the sixty day period provided for consideration in Section 7.05A, provided
that the initiative petition was filed no fewer than 80 days prior to the deadline imposed by
state law for the submission of ballot questions to the Commissioner of Elections.
2. Referendum. If required by this section, the vote of the City on a referred measure
shall be held at the first legally permissible election date more than forty days after the
expiration of the thirty day period provided for reconsideration in Section 7.05A, provided
that the referendum petition was filed no fewer than 50 days prior to the deadline imposed
by state law for the submission of ballot questions to the Commissioner of Elections. The
Council may provide for a special referendum election on a referred measure any time
more than 120 days after the filing of the referendum petition with the City Clerk-
C. Ballot. Copies of the proposed or referred measure shall be made available to the
qualified electors at the polls and shall be advertised at the City's expense in the manner
required for "questions" in section 376.5 of the Iowa Code. The subject matter and purpose
of the referred or proposed measure shall be indicated on the ballot. (Ord.15-4621, 5-19-
2015)
Section 7.06. Results of Election
A. Initiative. If a majority of the qualified electors voting on a proposed initiative
measure vote in its favor, it shall be considered adopted upon certification of the election
results. The adopted measure shall be treated in all respects in the same manner as
measures of the same kind adopted by the Council, except as provided in Section 7.01B(3).
If conflicting measures are approved by majority vote at the same election, the one
receiving the greatest number of affirmative votes shall prevail to the extent of such
conflict.
Page 15
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
B. Referendum. If a majority of the qualified electors voting on a referred measure vote
in favor of repealing the measure, it shall be considered repealed upon certification of the
election results. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015)
Section 7.07. Prohibition on Establishment of Stricter Conditions or Requirements.
The Council shall not set, except by Charter amendment, conditions or requirements
affecting initiative and referendum. (Ord. 15-4621, 5-19-2015)
ARTICLE VIII. CHARTER AMENDMENTS AND REVIEW
Section 8.01. Charter Amendments.
This Charter may be amended only by one of the following methods:
A. The Council, by resolution, may submit a proposed amendment to the voters at the
first legally permissible election date consistent with Section 7.OS(B) of this Charter, and
the proposed amendment becomes effective when approved by a majority of those voting.
B. The Council, by ordinance, may amend the Charter. However, within thirty (30) days
of publication of the ordinance, if a petition valid under the provisions of section 362.4 of
the Code of Iowa is filed with the Council, the Council must submit the amending ordinance
to the voters at the first legally permissible election date consistent with Section TOS(B) of
this Charter, and the amendment does not become effective until approved by a majority of
those voting.
C. Petitions.
1. Action by Council. If a petition valid under the provisions of section 362.4 of the
Code of Iowa is filed with the Council proposing an amendment to the Charter, the Council
shall promptly consider the proposed amendment. If the Council fails to adopt a proposed
amendment which is similar in substance within sixty days, it shall submit the proposed
amendment to the qualified electors of the City as hereinafter prescribed. If at any time
more than thirty days before the scheduled election the Council adopts a proposed
amendment which is similar in substance, the amendment proceedings shall terminate and
the proposed amendment shall not be submitted to the voters.
2. Amendment. If required by this section, the vote of the City on the proposed
amendment shall be held at the first legally permissible election date consistent with
Section 8.01(C) (1) of this Charter, and the amendment becomes effective if approved by a
majority of those voting. (Ord. OS-4152, 3-1-2005)
3. Ballot. Copies of the proposed amendment shall be made available to the
qualified electors at the polls and shall be advertised at the City's expense in the manner
required for "questions" in section 376.5 of the Iowa Code. The subject matter and purpose
of the proposed amendment shall be indicated on the ballot.
Page 16
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
Srtion 8.02. Charter Review Commi5§iQn.
The Council, using the procedures prescribed in Article V, shall establish a Charter Review
Commission at least once every ten years following the effective date of this Charter. The
Commission, consisting of at least nine members, shall review the existing Charter and
may, within twelve months recommend any Charter amendments that it deems fit to the
Council. The Council shall either exercise its power of amendment pursuant to Section
8.01B of the Charter on a matter recommended by the Commission or submit such
amendments to the voters in the form prescribed by the Commission, and an amendment
becomes effective when approved by a majority of those voting. (Ord. 05-4152, 3-1-2005)
CHARTER COMPARATIVE TABLE
The Home Rule Charter is set out in this volume as adopted by the voters on November 15,
1973, and by ordinance 76-2792, on January 2, 1976. The following table shows the
disposition of amendments to the Charter:
Ordinance Date Disposition
Number
77-2826 3-15- 6.01
1977
77-2858 9-6- 7.05B
1977
77-2864 9-6- 3.01
1977
85-3227
3-12-
Definitions 7,8, 2.01, 2.03, 2.05 - 2.08, 3.01- 3.03, 4.04, 5.02,
1985
6.04, 7.01- 7.05, 8.01, 8.02
85-3228
3-12-
6.02
1985
85-3273
12-17-
2.01
1985
90-3462
6-26-
7.03A, 7.04A
1990
95-3671
3-28-
2.06B, 2.08C,E, 3.01A, 6.01, 7.04D
1995
05-4152
3-1-
Definitions 11,12, 2.03, 2.05, 2.11, 2.12B, 3.01A, 3.02A, 4.04A,
2005
5.02, 5.03A, 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 7.01, 7.02, 7.03B,C,E, 7.04A,B,C,
7.05, 7.06, 8.01, 8.02
Res.07-262
8-31-
5.01
2007
Page 17
The following is a clean copy of the Iowa City Charter amended as proposed.
15-4621 5-19- Preamble, 2.06B, 3.01, 4.02A, 5.01, 5.02, 6.03, 7.01, 7.03, 7.04,
2015 7.05, 7.06, 7.07
Petition 11- 7.03A
2016
Page 18
Item Number: 3.b.
I, CITY OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
January 21, 2025
Climate Action Commission: December 2
Attachments: Climate Action Commission: December 2
MINUTES
IOWA CITY CLIMATE ACTION COMMISSION
DECEMBER 2, 2024 —3:30 PM— FORMAL MEETING
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
FI NAL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Anderson, Michal Eynon -Lynch, Zach Haralson, Jamie Gade,
Brinda Shetty, Michelle Sillman, Angie Smith, Gabriel Sturdevant
MEMBERS ABSENT: John Fraser, Ben Grimm, Wim Murray
STAFF PRESENT: Daniel Bissell, Sarah Gardner, Megan Hill, Diane Platte
OTHERS PRESENT: Bruce Titus, Dave Yankey, Brent Hartwig, Tyler Simmons, Thomas Agran,
Becky Soglin
CALL TO ORDER:
Sturdevant called the meeting to order at 3:30.
APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 18, 2024 MINUTES:
Anderson moved to approve the minutes, Shetty seconded, and the motion carried.
PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None.
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Action Items from last meeting (Staff):
• Staff is working with Clerk on next steps to revise by-laws
• Staff sent recording of City Council Nov. 19 work session to commissioners
• Staff shared commissioners' BRT/PUM questions with MPO, Greater IC, and City Manager
Events:
• None upcoming
Angie Smith joined the meeting at 3:35. Michelle Sillman joined the meeting at 3:37.
NEW BUSINESS:
Midyear presentations from Climate Action Grant awardees. Summarized in slides in agenda packet.
• Plated Table used grant funds for native plantings and an appliance.
• Oaknoll used grant funds for compost collection.
• Our Redeemer Lutheran Church used grant funds for LED lights.
OLD BUSINESS:
CRANDIC Bus Rapid Transit Study/Pop Up Metro discussion update
Climate Action Commission
December 2024
Page 2 of 4
• Gardner observed there is a bit of an information imbalance between BRT study and Pop -Up
Metro proposal, noting staff efforts to compare them on equal footing.
• Gardner shared that staff often reach out to other cities for information sharing when exploring
new projects and said she had reached out to transportation planners in Oklahoma City to set
up a meeting as their system was widely referenced in the BRT study, but as Pop Up Metro is
not yet in use in another U.S. city, could not do the same for it.
• Noting questions raised in a previous meeting as to the history of the company, maintenance
considerations, and how tested the trains were, Gardner shared that the Pop Up Metro trains
are currently owned by the Railroad Development Corporation (RDC) which acquired the two
trains from Vivarail in Great Britain after a bankruptcy following mechanical failures with some
of the trains. Another British company, Great Western Railroad (GWR), purchased the Vivarail
Intellectual Property (IP) and remaining rolling stock. It is unclear how this would impact the
ability to repair the trains or build more.
• The company that made Iowa City's electric buses, Proterra, also filed for bankruptcy, which has
resulted in some maintenance challenges related to obtaining parts and software updates.
• Gardner shared this information with Cady Gerlach of Greater IC as she wanted to give her a
chance to obtain more information before appearing before the Commission. Gerlach
requested time to do so.
• Sillman asked if the train cars are in use now. Gardner affirmed they are in use in Pennsylvania
for demonstration purposes, but her understanding was that they were not in regular hourly use
similar to full deployment in a transit system.
• Sturdevant asked about next steps. Gardner said she would stay in touch with Greater IC and
schedule a presentation when they were ready.
• Gardner explained the standard practice for charging EVs is to leave the batteries in place and
plug the vehicle in, noting all of the different vehicles included in the Fleet Transition Study were
charged this way. Because the Pop Up Metro trains use a novel approach, removing the
batteries each time to charge, staff do not have the expertise to evaluate such a system and
would recommend an independent engineering review. She noted an added benefit of studies is
sometimes to keep a project going in the face of different challenges.
Climate Action and Adaptation Plan updates and discussion
• Gardner described proposed providing updates section by section (Buildings, Transportation,
etc.) starting in March to better review the history of each item in preparation for reprioritizing
the Climate Action Plan next year.
• Eynon -Lynch asked about use of metrics previously discussed by the Commission in the visioning
process. Gardner said the EMS (Environmental Management System) approach discussed in a
prior meeting could serve as a good framework for those metrics and offered to ask Jane Wilch
to provide some guidance on using an EMS approach when she next presents to the
Commission.
• Smith asked about an update on Bicycle -Friendly Community application. Gardner shared the
City is still waiting to hear from the American League of Bicyclists as to the application and
offered to share it when available.
• Haralson asked about legislative priorities from City Council and how other organizations could
support those priorities. Gardner spoke of the City's lobbyist in Des Moines and offered to find
out how organizations could support their efforts.
• Sturdevant asked about bus shelter distribution along transit routes. Gardner offered to arrange
Climate Action Commission
December 2024
Page 3 of 4
a presentation from Transit later next year.
• Haralson asked about plans for electric vehicles in the Police Department. One vehicle has been
ordered but delayed twice. A second e-bike is coming.
• Eynon -Lynch encouraged CAC to consider the intended outcome of new projects using metrics
from visioning process and consider which actions are most effective as the reprioritization of
CAAP is undertaken.
• Sillman asked about re-engaging landlords around grants for EV chargers at multi -family
housing. Gardner confirmed that process has started, describing an approach based more on
one-on-one follow-up with landlords rather than presentations to the Landlords Association.
Sillman suggested senior living facilities might be good candidates for adding chargers.
• Sturdevant asked for comments on resilience hubs. Gardner explained NCJC has completed their
Resilience Hub plan. Their first round of funding will provide a generator for each of their three
facilities so that childcare can continue uninterrupted in the event of a disaster. The Bike Library
will also be in a stage of implementation this next year.
• Shetty asked if there are updates about Fare Free Transit. Gardner reported it seems to be on
track to meet the target.
RECAP:
Confirmation of next meeting time and location:
• Monday, January 6, 3:30-5 p.m. Emma J. Harvat Hall
Actionable items for commission, working groups, and staff:
• Staff will follow up on a question on how other organizations can support the City's legislative
priorities.
• Staff will follow up with Transit about presenting to CAC late next year.
Recognition of outgoing members
ADJOURNMENT:
Sillman moved to adjourn, Anderson seconded, and the motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 4:45.
3
Climate Action Commission
December 2024
Page 4 of 4
CLIMATE ACTION COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
2023-2024
N
W
A
(n
Ql
CO
l0
0
N
I--
r'
ri
NAME
TERM EXP.
N
W
N
L\
N
A
N
N
N
O\i
N
w
N
U,
N
W
N
N
N
00
0
N
W
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
N
A
A
Michael
12/31/2025
NM
O/E
X
O/E
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
Anderson
Michal Eynon-
12/31/2024
X
NM
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
Lynch
John Fraser
12/31/2024
X
NM
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
O/E
O/E
Jamie Gade
12/31/2025
X
NM
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
Ben Grimm
10/31/2026
X
NM
X
O/E
X
X
O/E
O/E
X
X
X
X
Zach Haralson
12/31/2025
NM
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
X
Matt Krieger
12/31/2023
O/
E
Wim Murray
MiclAmerican
X
NM
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
Rep
Michelle Sillman
12/31/20025
X
NM
O/E
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
Brinda Shetty
UI Rep
O/
NM
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
E
Angie Smith
12/31/2025
X
NM
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
Gabe Sturdevant
12/31/2024
X
NM
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
Matt Walter
12/31/2023
X
KEY: X = Present
0 = Absent
0/E = Absent/Excused
NM= No Meeting
* No longer on Commission
4
Item Number: 3.c.
a
CITY OF IOWA CITY
"QR T-4 COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
January 21, 2025
Economic Development Committee: October 16
Attachments: Economic Development Committee: October 16
Final - p.1
Council EDC, 10/16/24
Minutes
City Council Economic Development Committee
October 16, 2024
Emma J. Harvat Hall
City Council Economic Development Committee
Members Present: Josh Moe, Andrew Dunn
Members Absent: Laura Bergus
Staff Present: Geoff Fruin, Rachel Kilburg Varley, Eric Goers
Others Present: Curt Nelson (EDC, Inc.), Tracy Jon Sargent (MDC Iowa), John Kenyon
(City of Literature), Eric Johnson (Summer of the Arts), Andrew
Sherburne (FilmScene), John Englebrecht (Public Space One), John
Schickedanz (Englert), Adam Knight (Riverside Theatre)
Call to Order
Councilor Moe called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m.
Consider approval of minutes from the August 16, 2024 Economic Development
Committee meeting
Dunn moved, Moe seconded a motion to approve amended minutes of the August 16, 2024
meeting. Motion passed (2-0).
Review FY26 funding requests from Business Development and Arts & Culture Organi-
zations
Kilburg Varley referenced the staff cover memo included in the agenda packet and began by
reviewing the history of these funding requests and the FY26 requests submitted by each
organization. It was noted that the arts and culture organizations had also submitted a joint
letter this year expressing the need for increased funding a desire to meaningfully discuss a
path to increased funding support. Additionally, Public Space One submitted a request for
$25,000 for the first time. Next, Fruin provided an update on the current budgetary
environment and shared that, due to these factors, staff were unable to make a funding
recommendation and advise waiting until after impactful factors are known such as state
rollback rates, final taxable valuations, and upcoming collective bargaining settlements. Staff
also expressed appreciation for the role each organization plays in contributing to the local
economy.
EDC members reiterated support and appreciation for the work these organizations do and
invited public comment from those in attendance. Curt Nelson, EDC Inc., shared information
about the capital leveraged through their investments and responded to Councilor Moe's
question about specific organizations they assist who are located in Iowa City. John Kenyon,
Final - p.2
Council EDC, 10/16/24
City of Literature, reiterated the importance of the economic impact that each of the arts
organizations play in Iowa City, acknowledged the City's budget challenges, and indicated a
desire to have meaningful discussion over the next year about how increased funding support
could be achieved among the arts organizations. Angie Jordan, a member of the public,
commented on the funding process and encouraged more inclusivity in the process. Andrew
Sherburne, FilmScene, shared a statement communicating the importance that arts & culture
play in the economy, livability, and quality of life in Iowa City and the need to recognize and
intentionally support that. John Englebrecht, Public Space One, provided background on their
organization and their reason for submitting a funding request. Eric Johnson, Summer of the
Arts, noted that when considering the funding requests, it should be noted that many of the
organizations aim to provide free programming and promote access to the arts, which is an
important aspect of economic development.
Councilors Moe and Dunn thanked everyone for their comments and reiterated their support
and appreciation for each of the organizations and agreed with staff's encouragement to wait
on a funding recommendation until additional budgetary factors are known.
Set recuring EDC meeting time (quarterly)
The Committee established the first Wednesday of the quarter (January, April, July, and
October) at 8:30 a.m. as the standard recurring meeting time.
Old or New Business
None.
Ad4ournment
Dunn moved, Moe seconded that the meeting be adjourned. Motion carried (2-0)
Final - p.3
Council EDC, 10/16/24
Council Economic Development Committee
ATTENDANCE RECORD
2020-24
TERM
12/09/20
10/27/21
10/19/22
11/29/22
9/25/23
7/1/24
8/12/24
8/16/24
10/16/24
NAME EXP.
Josh
Moe 12/31/25
---
---
---
---
.--
X
X
X
X
Andrew
Dunn
12/31/25
---
---
---
---
---
X
O/E
X
X
Laura
Bergus
12/31/25
---
---
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
O/E
John
Thomas
01/02/24
X
X
X
X
X
—
—
---
—
Megan
Alter
01 /02/24
---
---
X
X
X
--
--
---
---
Susan
Mims
01/02/22
X
X
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Mazahir
Salih
01/02/22
O/E
X
Key:
X = Present
O = Absent
--- = not a member
O/E = Absent/Excused
Item Number: 3.d.
I, CITY OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
January 21, 2025
Historic Preservation Commission: December 12
Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission: December 12
MINUTES APPROVED
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
DECEMBER 12, 2024 —5:30PM —FORMAL MEETING
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Margaret Beck, Carl Brown, Kevin Burford, Andrew Lewis, Jordan
Sellergren, Deanna Thomann, Nicole Villanueva, Frank Wagner, Christina
Welu-Reynolds,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ryan Russell
STAFF PRESENT: Jessica Bristow
CALL TO ORDER:
Sellergren called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None
CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
HPC24-0048: 621 North Johnson Street - Brown Street Historic District (alterations to garage windows
and doors):
Bristow began the staff report stating this house is likely a catalog home. It has a couple siding patterns
with a narrow lap siding with corner boards and also a staggered shingle with mitered corners, battered
columns. The house is very intact and considered a key contributing property in the historic district. It
also has a small historic garage, and some small changes to the garage are the project that's under
review today. Bristow shared the site plan of the garage here noting it's located almost on the property
line. Staff has been working with this property owner off and on for almost a year on various
possibilities for using the space for living space. She next shared some photos of the garage noting the
original swinging hinged doors on the north side and the one small window, which can be seen from
Ronalds Street, there are no windows on the back and then on the south side, looking into the yard,
there is just one small window. The plan is to make the garage into one large space with a laundry with
a sink, and a bath with a toilet and a tub. They do plan for a mini split for some conditioning of the air
and will likely, eventually put in some type of on demand water heater.
Bristow stated she worked with the applicants and went through a few options. First the mini split was
originally on the back but by code it has to be two feet from the property line so they're moving it around
the corner to the south side. Regarding the windows there were a few options, if they wanted to retain
the current type of window and not actually replace those windows, because they're not beyond repair
and in pretty good condition, they would just add an additional window on the south side and a passage
door. They also want to add some windows to the historic garage doors. And then the plan is to make
the original windows operable and add a hinge and the ability to hold them open. At one point, they
talked about skylights but that is not in the current plan. Bristow shared one of the windows, she had
mentioned there is a possibility of making it either an awning or a hopper window by adding a hinge and
she noted the trim is the stop for the window on the outside so the hinge and any adjustment to the stop
will have to happen on the inside and for the windows to operate they will open inwards. Bristow still
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
December 12, 2024
Page 2 of 8
needs to discuss the new window operations with the applicant if they'll want the additional window to
operate the same way as the original ones. Regarding adding windows to the two garage doors, the
applicant submitted a few images of local garages as examples that have similar windows and staff
does agree that a certain window configuration would definitely be possible. Bristow is unsure exactly
how they will add the windows, so she did mention to them that they'd probably have to remove some
of the bead board, keep the frame of the door, which is the entire structure of the door, and use the
frame as the exterior stop. They'll then add some interior stop to hold the glass in place and mutton
bars. It would also be possible to put in an insulated glass unit if they wanted to but the door itself isn't
insulated. The passage door the applicant is proposing is a pressed steel door and staff finds that a
steel door does not meet the requirements for a wood replacement in the guidelines. Steel doors are
not paintable in the same way and they do tend to dent and rust. So typically either a wood door or a
fiberglass door would be approved which the applicant did agree to, and since this house has
craftsman details staff would find it acceptable to have a fiberglass version with two panels and a small
divided window as typically seen on a garage or a Craftsman Style to match the house.
Bristow stated because they also want to put laundry in this space, the dryer will need a vent by code,
so there will be a small dryer vent hole that's put in the side of the garage. Additionally, they will
probably install a water heater, she's assuming it might be a gas water heater, which also would have a
vent and need some type of small opening on the side of the garage. It would be acceptable to have
the vents on any side except for the front.
The guidelines that relate to this project include retaining the historic garage doors, which the applicant
voluntarily wanted to do and never proposed to replace, adding new door openings that are trimmed to
match the others so that new door and new window will match the trim on the other windows. Bristow
shared the guideline about substituting a material in place for wood, durable, accept paint and be
approved by HPC and that a steel door is not approved. Regarding windows, preserving the historic
windows, which they do propose to do, adding windows that match the type, size, sash width, etc., of
the existing windows, adding new windows in a location that matches the window pattern already on
the garage, and the windows on out buildings should be relatively small and rectangular or square.
Bristow stated the recommended motion for this project is to approve the project with the condition that
that the passage door is constructed of wood or fiberglass and that all windows and glazing complies
with the guidelines so that they could work through the window alterations with the applicant.
MOTION: Lewis moves approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 621 North
Johnson Street as presented in the application with the following conditions:
1. The door is constructed of wood or fiberglass
2. All windows and glazing complies with the guidelines.
Brown seconded the motion.
Thomann stated she likes that this garage is being used in this way, they talk and hear about how more
housing is needed in the City and this is a nice way to incorporate it within an old neighborhood.
A vote was taken and the motion passed 9-0.
HPC24-0117: 518 North Van Buren Street- Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District(chimney
demolition):
Bristow stated this house is located in the Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District and just
across the alley is the Northside Historic District. The house has been highly modified and is
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
December 12, 2024
Page 3 of 8
considered noncontributing but looking into this house she did find some interesting facts. The survey
stated it was built in or around the 1880s but it is not shown on the fire insurance maps until 1926.
Bristow believes it was moved to this site between 1921 and 1926. The house is basically a Queen
Anne cross gabled house with scroll brackets at the corners. There is crown molding and a band board
separating the second floor from the attic. There is also an interesting belt course below the windowsill
for the second floor, and that's shingled and tapered. On the south side there is a projecting bay, called
a canted bay meaning the corners are cut off and there are scroll brackets that support the upper floor,
which is not canted. These are Queen Anne details. On the back side is another little inset porch with
columns also bracketed. Likely after it was moved, someone added a large masonry porch to the front
of the house. It may have been considered a modernization with Craftsman details. At some point,
someone decided to enclosed a portion of the porch and also added living space to the basement with
egress windows on the front of the enclosed portion. There is also access to an upper floor apartment
that goes across the front porch roof and up the side, and another basement entry on the north side..
The subject of this project is a chimney. They've had some leaks in the roof so they had someone go
up and they were able to repair the larger chimney on the house by adding some flashing. While they
were up there they determined that the subject chimney was not stable and they needed to take it down
so currently there is just a stove pipe. The guidelines talk about the fact that historic chimneys should
be preserved, typically repairing and capping unused chimneys in a matter that prevents vermin from
entering but allows air circulation. The guidelines do not recommend new chimney pipes to just
penetrate the roof and typically require that they construct a faux chimney with framing and thin bricks
to obscure metal chimney pipes. They have to make sure there's enough support underneath, but using
thin bricks and some mortar can approximate the look of a traditional chimney, especially when it's far
away. It is disallowed to remove prominent chimneys that are important to the historic architectural
character the building. In staffs opinion, if this was not a used chimney and there were no pipes
involved, they would recommend approval to demolish it as it's on the back, and it wasn't architecturally
significant. Because this house already has had some alterations, staff is recommending that they
shorten the pipe to what code requires, which is two feet and straighten it. If the Commission wants to
be flexible or lenient for this particular project that could be approved. However, they have also not
approved leaving a bare chimney pipe like that so far. It is the Commission's role to decide.
Bristow wanted to point out a few other alterations to this house. Originally the rear facing wing had
extended and matched but then it has been built out to the south with a dormer above. Several
entrances were added. Looking at the rear of the house, because of the fact that the chimney was
there, it likely never had a window in that location but since there's now likely an apartment up here
they've added a window at some point. She also discovered in the survey where they mentioned that
at one point there was a basement garage, likely that came off the alley under the back part of the front
porch and that would have been done when the house was moved to this location.
Bristow reiterated that the current project is the removal of the chimney which is already complete. She
doesn't know if they removed it below the roof or if there's anything in the attic to support it being
rebuilt, so the Commission could either approve it as recommend by shortening it or they could also
approve it stating they need to frame it out and use thin bricks as if it was a new chimney pipe that was
penetrating the roof.
Villanueva asked how this project came to the City. Bristow explained this is one of those situations
where a neighbor reported that the chimney had been removed so the City sent an inspector out and
the inspector let them know they needed to apply for a demolition permit. Then because an historic
review is needed for a demolition permit this is being brought before the Commission.
Bristow noted it is a rental property and she's been in conversation with the owner, or the person in
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
December 12, 2024
Page 4 of 8
charge, maybe a property manager, and feels they would agree to shortening it. She did however let
them know that it's possible that the Commission could require that they rebuild it and make a false
chimney.
Brown asked if the owners had come to the City with the picture of the chimney in the state that it had
been in before they demolished it what would the recommended approach have been. Bristow stated
they would have recommended repairing the chimney. She looked back and there have been
numerous violations of the chimney being in disrepair over the last three decades and she is assuming
it has just never had been repaired completely after the derecho and/or other related storms.
Brown asked in the demolition recommendations how do they determine if this is a historic architectural
feature chimney or a non -historic architectural feature chimney. Bristow stated her recommendation is
that this is not a significant architectural feature because it's utilitarian and not decorative. Also what
remains is on the back and like many Queen Anne houses this house has a larger and more decorative
chimney and while neither of the chimneys are readily visible from the street the larger one is more
decorative. So if this smaller chimney was not being used, she would have recommend approving its
demolition.
Brown asked for a house that has multiple chimneys on it, there's sometimes a secondary one and it
can be not architecturally significant but if a house only has one chimney, regardless of how decorative
it is, is that chimney almost by definition is architecturally significant. Bristow explained the
Commission has approved removal of the only chimney on a house before and in some cases those
were the only chimney on the building. It is a case of looking at each individual house and its chimney
separately.
Beck asked if it matters that the house is noncontributing, does that factor into the discussion. Bristow
stated it can, there is not a specific guideline that would allow an exception to the guidelines for a
noncontributing property in these two sections.
Thomann is curious about the pipe height and that it is not at a height that the code would approve at
this point. Is that the code for the City or just for historic situations. Bristow explained the building code
states the requirements for chimneys, and it can be a complicated, but basically where there's not
another roof that's within 20 feet a chimney needs to project out of the roof two feet, it can't be shorter
than that but it can be taller. She is assuming that at one point this chimney was taller but now they've
lost those bricks.
Lewis asked about the lost bricks. Bristow explained they've either fallen on the ground or fallen inside.
Bristow stated the staff recommendation allows them to leave the brick off, straighten the pipe, but
shorten it and patch the roof to match. The Commission can make this motion or they can make a
different motion.
MOTION: Wagner moves approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 518 North
Van Buren Street as presented in the application with the following conditions:
1. The existing chimney pipe is straightened and shortened to a code -required height (2 feet)
2. The roof is patched to match the existing roof.
Villanueva seconded the motion.
Sellergren stated she would prefer to just go with the motion, given the condition of the house she
doesn't think there's a whole lot of point in preserving what's not there.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
December 12, 2024
Page 5 of 8
Lewis noted they've had people do this before, demolish things without getting approval and in this
instance they would have likely had them repair so he doesn't think it's out of line to say build the
chimney back up.
Brown agrees and states he struggles often in these things, people do things and then once it's done
the Commission just approves it, he's not a fan of that. There was a porch recently they talked about a
whole bunch where that's what they did, they put a new porch in and didn't do it in any of the ways they
were supposed to and the Commission made them rebuild it the way they were supposed to. In this
situation it's compromised halfway so should they allow them to go ahead and cut the pipe down
because they went all the way over and demolished it without asking first.
Sellergren thinks that would stand more with her if the house weren't so heavily modified prior to
guidelines being in place and it's so unlikely that the house would ever be brought back to the Queen
Anne it once was.
Welu-Reynolds agrees and feels they are at this stage because of that, what's already happened with
the house and she doesn't want to be punitive, this is a compromise that she feels comfortable with
given the house. To lower the height of the pipe will look good, it's also on the back of the house and
not going to be seen from the street.
Sellergren stated it's not ideal, but neither is the house in general, they have homes that really should
be preserved because they're in good shape, or something close to good shape, and there's potential
for them. This is not that situation, there's so much going on, and they need to pick their battles
because they want the residents of Iowa City and property owners to be on their side.
Lewis stated there are times they need to compromise, but maybe in this case the compromise would
be shorten the pipe, but then build the chimney up to that level. He noted parts of this house are so far
gone so what are they preserving at this point, but then what stops someone else from going in and just
saying they are going to change what they want and then the house is beyond the point of historicity,
Sellergren noted the example of the front porch was that house was intact beyond that porch
replacement so such a different situation.
Burford stated the point of shortening that the chimney is just aesthetic, it's not a working chimney
A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-2 (Brown and Lewis dissenting).
REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF:
Certificate of No Material Effect -Chair and Staff review:
HPC24-0112: 1033 Woodlawn Avenue - Woodlawn Historic District (internal gutter, trim, and porch
repair):
Bristow explained this house is having some work done on the porch. There is an addition on this
house and so some of the porch had been replaced in the past. The columns used to have nice,
normal weep holes and they've been blocked out also the floor is rotting out. There's an internal gutter
that has had some issues and the contractor is going to just repair it.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
December 12, 2024
Page 6 of 8
HPC24-0113: 425 Oakland Avenue - Longfellow Historic District (brick step reconstruction and dryer
vent installation):
This house on Oakland Avenue has had a couple different projects: the Commission approved a rear
egress window and window well on this house and they added a basement laundry. There is an old
coal chute on the side and they had proposed to make a hole in the metal coal chute and put the dryer
vent on it. Staff was concerned for multiple reasons and stated they need to make a hole in the brick
wall on the back. So, on the opposite side of the sunroom they'll put a little hole in the wall, they
changed around their basement floor plan so that was acceptable. Additionally, the brick steps had
been covered with carpet and were totally deteriorating. Bristow met the mason at the house and he
thought he was going to need to only take down some of the side walls and be able to put them back
up. The surface is going to be brick and the stairs will be too. She gave them the option to use
concrete but they decided they wanted to do brick.
Minor Review -Staff review:
HPC24-0115: 602 Dearborn Street - Dearborn Street Conservation District new deck -
Bristow stated last year the Commission approved an addition on the back of this house and they
originally just had a little stoop and step but decided they wanted to do a deck. It will mostly be at
grade but might still have a railing.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 1.4, 2024:
MOTION: Thomann moves to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's
November 14, 2024 meeting. Lewis seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 9-0.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION:
Election of Officers:
Wagner nominates Jordan Sellergren for vice chair and Andrew Lewis for chair. Welu-Reynolds
seconded the motion, a vote was taken and the motion passed 9-0.
Awards Update:
Bristow noted in the past, when they had the Historic Preservation Awards they brought them to the
Commission for approval and then staff send out the notifications. Then a year or so ago the
Commission voted that they didn't need to be approved by the Commission but they still want to show
the awardees at this meeting.
Bristow noted they don't currently have an application for the January meeting, but it doesn't mean they
won't have a meeting. Bristow noted they do need to discuss the Commission's work plan so perhaps
they could do that at the January meeting since they will do the annual report in February. She noted
she will be out of town beginning the December 24 — January 6.
Bristow reminded the Commission the Historic Preservation Awards is February 27 at the library. They
have gathered most of the information and the next thing is to figure out who's writing things and who's
presenting things.
Bristow noted the United States of America has a 250th anniversary that's coming up in 2026 and
across the nation, and across the state, communities are doing official things to celebrate that. She isn't
aware if the Iowa City community has already started working on this or has thoughts but there are
some communities that have started working on it and it's just the kind of thing that presumably this
Commission would be somehow involved in some way.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
December 12, 2024
Page 7 of 8
Bristow then reviewed the Historic Preservation Awards nominations with the Commission.
ADJOURNMENT:
Lewis moved to adjourn the meeting. Wagner seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 9-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 pm.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD
2024
TERM
1/11
2/8
3/21
4/24
5/22
6/13
7/11
8/8
9/12
10/10
11/14
12/12
NAME
EXP.
X
BECK,
6/30/24
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
MARGARET
BROWN,
6/30/26
O/E
O/E
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
O/E
X
X
X
X
CARL
BURFORD,
6/30/27
---
---
---
---
---
---
X
X
X
X
X
X
KEVIN
LEWIS,
6/30/26
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ANDREW
RUSSELL,
6/30/27
---
---
---
--
--
r-
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
RYAN
SELLERGREN,
6/30/25
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
JORDAN
STORK, NOAH
6/30/24
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
---
---
---
---
--
---
THOMANN,
6/30/26
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
I
X
X
X
X
DEANNA
VILLANUEVA,
6/30/25
X
X
X
X
X
X
X IO/E
X
X
X
X
NICOLE
WAGNER,
6/30/26
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
i
O/E
X
X
X
FRANK
I
I
WELU-
6/30/25
X
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X X
X
O/E
X
X
REYNOLDS,
CHRISTINA
KEY: X = Present
O = Absent
O/E= Absent/Excused
--- = Not a member
Item Number: 3.e.
a
CITY OF IOWA CITY
"QF T-4 COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
January 21, 2025
Parks & Recreation Commission: November 13 [See Recommendation]
Attachments: Parks & Recreation Commission: November 13 [See Recommendation]
CITY OF IOWA CITY
'Oki
Date: 1 /8/2025
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Staff Member of Parks and Recreation Commission
Re: Recommendation from Parks and Recreation Commission
At their November 13, 2024, meeting the Parks and Recreation Commission made the following
recommendations to the City Council:
To approve the adjusted User Fees and Charges for FY26 as suggested by staff.
Additional action (check one)
X No further action needed.
Board or Commission is requesting Council direction.
Agenda item will be prepared by staff for Council action.
IOWA CITY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION APPROVED
MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 2024
MEETING ROOM A — ROBERT A. LEE RECREATION CENTER
Members Present: Alex Hachtman, Connie Moore, Aaron Broege, Rachel McPherson, Brian
Morelli, Caleb Recker, Alex Stanton
Members Absent: Missie Forbes, Virginia Hayes
Staff Present: Juli Seydell Johnson, Tyler Baird, Brad Barker, Gabe Gotera, Josh Worrell
Others Present: Mark Cannon, Mitzi Read
CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hachtman called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council
action):
Moved by Moore, seconded by Morelli to recommend the approval of the adiusted User
Fees and Charges for FY26 as suggested by staff. Motion Passed 7-0 (Forbes and Haves
absent.
OTHER FORMAL ACTION:
Moved by Stanton, seconded by Broege, to approve the September 13, 2024, minutes.
Motion passed 5-0 (Forbes, Haves, McPherson, and Morelli absent).
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None
USER FEES AND CHARGES — Recreation_Supt, Barker
Supt. Barker announces that it is the annual time to review the suggested FY26 fees and charges
for various programs and rental facilities within the department. Baker says that typically, the
increase of fees would be scheduled to alternate every year between having an increase or no
increase. Barker states that the staff recommendation for the FY26 fees and charges would see
increases in the range of 3-8%. There is some variability in the increase, as staff try to keep the
fees consistently rounded to a whole number for customer convenience. Barker explains several
notable variations in the recommended user fees for the following items:
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 2 of 12
■ The Farmers Market
o The suggested vendor fee saw an increase of $5. This brings the vendor fee per
day, per stall to a total of $25. Of the $5 increase, $4.50 will go towards the `land
rental fee' that helps cover the staffing cost and expenses for programs and
supplies. The remaining $0.50 will go towards the `advertising fee' for the
promotion of the market. Barker explains that this is the first time in four years
that the vendor fee has risen. Barker says that at the time of the last fee increase, it
was recommended to not increase the famers market fee because of the recent
initiative from Council to start collecting insurance information. This required
vendors to have their own liability insurance which would be a new fee in of itself
at the time. Now that costs for staffing, equipment, and materials are increasing, it
has come time for the vendor fees to increase.
■ Recreation Center Operations
o The suggested fee for locker replacement keys increases from $35 to $45. This
updated fee better represents the true cost of key replacement, including shipping
and administrative costs.
• Aquatics
o Group lessons have no proposed fee increases to keep this option as affordable as
possible. Affordable lessons align closely with the department's `Every Child in
Iowa City Learns to Swim' initiative. Barker explains that while there are
scholarships to provide these lessons, the prices must remain affordable for those
who are unable to qualify for those scholarships.
o General private lesson options are no longer an offered as the department strives
to focus on teaching more children how to swim through group and adaptive
lessons.
o Drop -in swim admission fees do not have a proposed fee increase. However,
possible across-the-board raises in the aquatics fee structure will need to be
considered prior to the anticipated opening of the new City Park Pool.
• Terry Trueblood Lodge
o A new peak -season, low -season cost structure is proposed. Holidays and peak -
season weekend rates during April through September will be $290 per hour or
$2,000 for an all -day rental. Low -season weekend rates during October through
March will be $230 per hour or $1,600 for an all -day rental. Monday through
Thursday throughout the year will be $110 per hour or $800 for an all -day rental.
• Dog Parks
o Drop -in dog park fees do not have a proposed fee increase. Much of these daily
fees are collected on an honor system, so keeping this fee reasonable low
encourages continued participation. Barker explains that the drop -in fees are
collected via drop -box or through the Park Mobile app.
Commissioner Morelli asks if it would be possible to add the ability to purchase the annual dog
tag at the dog park itself, explaining that it is not very convenient to go to Animal Services or the
Rec Centers to purchase an annual tag. Supt. Barker responds that it could be possible if there are
staff at the dog parks to handle the annual dog tags but explains that the staffing hours can be
sporadic. Staff are scheduled at irregular times so that they can check on people's annual tags or
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 3 of 12
to see if they are paying the daily drop -in fee. Barker suggests that an online option to purchase
the annual tags could be looked into as a more feasible approach. Dir. Seydell Johnson interjects,
explaining that patrons are required to show proof of their dog's rabies vaccination to purchase
an annual dog tag. Seydell Johnson explains that this is why the annual dog tags are purchased
in -person as opposed to online, as dictated by Animal Services, not the Parks and Recreation
department.
Vice Chairman Moore says that after reading through the suggested fees and charges, she found
them to be very reasonable.
Chairman Hachtman asks Supt. Barker to speak about some of the programs available to help
those who are less fortunate with covering costs. Barker explains that the RecAssist program was
previously rebranding from the Low -Income Discount program, which from a marketing
perspective made it easier to advertise in a way with less stigma attached. Apart from a few items
such as drop -in fees and the pottery studio, the program can be applicable to most other
programs and passes offered, reducing the fees by 50%. A person can apply either online or in -
person, listing their income, the number of people in their household, and any government
assistance programs that they have, and if qualified will have the 50% reduced fees for the entire
calendar year. Patrons would be required to reapply for the next calendar year. Barker says that
the number of people utilizing this service has been increasing each year, showing that the
marking efforts are working, making people more comfortable with applying and increasing both
program registration and attendance.
Moved by Moore, seconded by Morelli to recommend the approval of the adiusted User
Fees and Charges for FY26 as sueizested by staff. Motion Passed 7-0 (Forbes and Haves
absent.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BUDGET UPDATE 2024-2029 — Parks and
Recreation Dir, Sevdell Johnson
Dir. Seydell Johnson presents the attached PowerPoint over the 2024-2029 Parks & Recreation
Capital Improvement Plan.
Commissioner Stanton, regarding the City Park Pool project, asks when the decision was made
to move the design to three pools instead of one larger pool and a diving well. Dir. Seydell
Johnson explains that when the City Council approved the schematic designs, one of the options
that the Council left open was to have either two or three pools in the design. Seydell Johnson
adds that the Council has already seen the current design and has approved to move forward with
the three pools. Stanton says that from his conversation with people who gave input, the main
reason that they picked the first option was because everything was within eyesight of
everywhere. Stanton explains that families with small kids could have a big issue with a three -
pool design, where their child could get up and take off into another pool. Stanton also points out
that if a parent has a younger child and an older child, each in a different pool, they wouldn't be
able to watch both at the same time. Seydell Johnson responds that the pool is being designed
with sightlines in mind and points out a row of chairs in between the pools that is meant to keep
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 4 of 12
kids corralled to one side or the other. Stanton asks, during open swim, how many of the lap
lanes are used for open swim versus lap swimming. Seydell Johnson says that the plan is to
always have two -to -three of the 50m lap lanes available for lap swimming during open swim.
Vice Chairman Moore, regarding the City Park Pool project, asks if there is still a possibility to
include a 25m lap lane. Dir. Seydell Johnson says that this was looked at, but it was not able to
work within the budget. Seydell Johnson says that while there is not a 25m lap lane, a rope could
be put across the 50m lap lane at the half way point. Seydell Johnson clarifies that the lap pool
will have a depth of 3-1/2 to 5ft, so it is walkable for the most part of the entire lane.
Commissioner Morelli, regarding the City Park Pool project, asks if there are less shade
structures shown than in previous designs. Dir. Seydell Johnsons confirms that in the picture
shown there are less shade structures but clarifies that this is because the exact locations have not
yet been decided.
Commissioner Morelli, regarding the Terrell Mill Roller Park project, asks if the land belongs to
the Corp of Engineers. Dir. Seydell Johnsons confirms that the land does not belong to the Corp
but clarifies that a permit application has been submitted to the Corp due to the project's
proximity to the river.
Commissioner Recker, regarding the Terrell Mill Roller Park project, asks if the parking at
Terrell Mill Park will remain the same. Dir. Seydell Johnson confirms that parking will remain
the same.
Commissioner McPherson, regarding the College Green Park Playground project, asks if the
hoop on the basketball court is adjustable. Dir. Seydell Johnson confirms that the basketball hoop
will not be adjustable. Supt. Baird explains that operationally, staff have found that adjustable
hoops break much more often than a non-adjustable hoop from the repetitive up and down
motions. Another issue is that the rims get bent more often when park users hang on it while the
hoop is lower than usual. Baird says that he would love to have variable heights as an option, but
that he would instead prefer to have a hoop that functions consistently.
Vice Chairman Moore, regarding the Palisades Park Development project, asks where the park
land is located. Supt. Baird responds that it is near the old N Dodge Street Hy-Vee. Dir. Seydell
Johnson adds that this project is similar in both size and scope to the Adelaide Joy Rogers Park
project and that it took eighteen years for the department to receive the land from the developers.
Commissioner Morelli, regarding the Rec Center Annual Improvements and the RALRC
Structural Cable Repairs projects, asks if the projects for the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center
account for what might happen with the future of the pool area. Dir. Seydell Johnson confirms
that the Robert A. Lee projects do not pertain to the future of the pool and is solely work that
needs to be complete for the building's shell integrity. Morelli asks if, depending on how the pool
project turns out, would any of the work done on the building's integrity have to be redone
during the pool project. Seydell Johnson explains that that could potentially happen but clarifies
that if the building integrity projects aren't completed soon, then the necessary repairs would be
even bigger than before. Seydell Johnson reiterates that the Rec Center projects are to upkeep the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 5 of 12
integrity of the build basic structure, and because no decision has been made of what could
happen with the pool, staff must act on what needs help right now.
Commissioner McPherson, regarding the Parks & Tree Annual Improvements projects, asks if
any of the funds would go towards trees on the right-of-way or if it just for parks. Supt. Baird
explains that that project would include the right-of-way trees. Baird says that the Tree Annual
Improvement funds are consistently around $30,000 annually while the Parks Annual
Improvement funds are more variable each year.
Commissioner McPhersons, regarding the Ped Mall Fountain project, asks for clarification on
why the colored concrete would be more sustainable. Mng. Worrell explains that currently the
flooring is a hardscape stone with a sand or short grout layer underneath, so when a car drives
over them, it rocks the stones and breaks the grout joints between. The water from the fountain
then flows through the cracks and walks the sand out, making the tiles lie unevenly. Worrell says
that staff are looking at different options, one of which being color concrete, which would last
longer than the hardscape stones that are currently used.
Commissioner Broege, regarding the Benton Hill Park Renovations asks if any of the project has
to do with trail maintenance or the nearby trees towards the back of the park. Supt. Baird
responds that staff could look at those aspects for the project but clarifies that the deciding
factors will depend on what the budget allows. Baird explains that the trail is a soft surface trail,
mostly being gravel. Baird adds that staff, during the last year, have been working on pushing
back invasive species, decreasing the amount of overgrowth, and making the trail more
accessible. Broege asks if the tree house feature in the park is ADA accessible. Baird says that
the structure itself should be ADA accessible but that the trail leading up has gravel surfacing,
which may not be accessible all the time.
Commissioner Morelli, regarding items that weren't mentioned, says that the trail near the
Burlington St. bridge and the trail under the bridge at the intersection of Newton and Riverside
are out of access and asks if these would be under the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation
department. Dir. Seydell Johnson explains that these projects are not under the Parks and
Recreation department but does explain that both bridges are being looked at and that one of the
projects has been delayed due to a lack of bids from contractors.
Commissioner Morelli asks if Parks and Recreation will have any role in looking at the
accessibility of park functions for when the Burling St. bridge is replaced, adding that there are
great opportunities for recreation for both pedestrians and cyclists. Dir. Seydell Johnson says
there will be a public process for that project that the Commissions can be involved in but
clarifies that the Parks and Recreation department will not have a role in it.
Commissioner McPherson asks how it was decided that the roof repairs at Mercer were more
pressing that the roof at Robert A. Lee. Dir. Seydell Johnson and Mng. Worrell explains that
there was a study complete around 2021-2022 looking at the roofs of City Hall, the Mercer Park
Aquatic Center & Scanlon Gymnasium, and the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center, knowing that
repairs would be imminent at these three locations. The order of the repairs was based on the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 6 of 12
condition of the three different roofs. When the Mercer roof was looked at, it was found to be
covered in rips, causing it to move up the list of priorities quickly.
REPORT ON ITEMS FROM CITY STAFF:
Parks and Recreation Director — Juli Sevdell Johnson
Parks: Dir. Seydell Johnson announces that the Ped Mall Playground surfacing has been
repaired. Seydell Johnson explains that the playground is currently closed and that the project
contractors have made repairs on the torn open parts of the surfacing. Seydell Johnson clarifies
that while this is a temporary solution, it does keep the playground from having tripping hazards
through the winter.
Deer: Dir. Seydell Johnson relays that the City Council has decided to allow the bow hunting of
deer in specific parts of City Park after being approached by neighbors of the area. The city
allows bow hunting throughout the community, but under strict restrictions. Due to the size of
the lots around City Park and the Ashton House, there are not many places for people to hunt,
allowing the deer population to rise and push the neighborhood to ask the City Council what
could be done. The decision was made to allow limited bow hunting of deer in City Park, mostly
along the western area on the hilltop near the Parks shop and out between the river and the ball
diamonds. The only caveat being that currently, only City employees are eligible to do the bow
hunting. Seydell Johnson says that as of November 13, only one city employee has shown
interest. A deer stand has been approved to be set up to the north of the ball fields. The trails
won't be closed for the duration, so park visitors may see some bow hunting during the current
deer season. Seydell Johnson clarifies that currently, the Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) does not allow the city to bring in a sharpshooter and do anything more than bow
hunting.
Commissioner McPherson asks if the DNR had previously allowed sharpshooting in Oakland
Cemetery. Dir. Seydell Johnson confirms that the DNR did previously allow the city to have the
White Buffalo Company do sharpshooting, but now the DNR feels that bow hunting would be
sufficient to keep the deer population in check.
Commissioner Stanton asks if there is any discussion in opening bow hunting to non -city staff.
Dir. Seydell Johnson responds that the city will try first with only city staff, but if it is found
there is enough deer population to support more hunters in the area it may open up further.
Seydell Johnson says that the best thing someone can do right now is to get qualified at Fin and
Feather for bow hunting and then let the city know that there is interest. Stanton asks what the
hours are that hunting is allowed. Seydell Johnson responds that the hours have not yet been
determined.
Vice Chairman Moore asks what will happen with the dead deer. Mgr. Worrell explains that
multiple things can happen with the deer. A hunter could harvest and preserve it themselves.
They could bring the deer to a local locker affiliated with the Help Us Stop Hunger (HUSH)
Program where it will be ground up and distributed to those who would want it. Moore asks for
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 7 of 12
confirmation that the public can get deer meat. Worrell says that there are stipulations to
prioritize the underserved, but that generally anyone could go there and get the ground deer
meat. Worrell adds that the state provides a list of such lockers in the local area. Dir. Seydell
Johnson comments that when there were sharpshooters several years prior, the deer meat went
through the local food bank.
Roosevelt Ravine: Dir. Seydell Johnson refers to correspondence in the packet from two
individuals asking the Commission to consider reaching out to a land owner to preserve an area
called the Roosevelt Ravine, behind the old Roosevelt Elementary School. The elementary
school has been closed for some time and there has been a lot of different interest in having the
land redeveloped. Seydell Johnson explains that the land is owned by a private company who
have not yet given the city a development plan, so currently there is no action that the
Commission can take. Seydell Johnson says that it may come up in a future discussion but that
for the time being, there is nothing to discuss.
Seydell Johnson thanks Chairman Hachtman and Commissioner Broege for being part of the
Parks and Recreation Commission, as this may be their last meeting of their terms.
Recreation Superintendent — Brad Barker
October: Supt. Barker says that October is a very busy month for the department. Being the
month of Halloween, there is an abundance of themed events and programming. Events for
October 2024 include the following:
• The Halloween Carnival, hosted in the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center, saw great
attendance, with more than 1,200 people coming through the doors. Staff utilized every
nook and cranny of the facility and outdoor areas. Many families attended in their
Halloween costumes.
• Indigenous Peoples' Day was held on October 14 at the Terry Trueblood Recreation Area.
This is the 2nd year the annual event has been hosted after being initiated by Recreation
Program Supervisor, Malory Smysor who oversees Adaptive Programming and Outreach
Programming. Barker explains that Smysor reached out to make sure that this event was
fully represented with a lot of different partners. The Great Plaines Action Network was
one of the bigger partners this year. To see more attendance, staff are looking at hosting
the event on a Sunday rather than the actual Indigenous Peoples' Day date which is
typically on a Monday.
Farmers Markel: Supt. Barker announces that the Holiday Market will be held on November 16
and December 14 from 8 a.m. — 1 p.m. at the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center in the Gymnasium
and the Social Hall. There will be a lot of both new and returning vendors showing off their
crafts, arts, and baked goods.
Ned Ashton House: Supt. Barker explains that the Ned Ashton House has transitioned from a
rental facility into a hub for adaptive recreation programming. Barker says that Supv. Smysor has
filled the house with second-hand furniture, making the facility into a cozy space. Most of the
adaptive recreation programs have been hosted at the Ashton Hose and are running smoothly.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 8 of 12
Pool Temperatures: Supt. Barker passes out a handout going over the processes to set the pool
temperature. Barker explains that this is in response to the Commission's request for staff to look
into pool temperatures at the September 2024 meeting. Barker goes over the diagram showing
the journey of the water through filtration, chlorination, and heating. Throughout this loop
system, there are various sensors and controls points that automatically adjust as needed to keep
the pool temperature at a controlled setpoint. This system also sends an alert to the operator if
any variables become misaligned from its set range. The Robert A. Lee (RAL) pool's setpoint is
consistently set at 83 degrees, measured at both the pool pit and pool water return sensor. Barker
explains that RAL Pool is the wanner of the two indoor pools and it is programmed as such,
hosting swim lessons, family open swim and events, arthritic and physical therapy users, and
water fitness classes. Barker adds that there are some lap swimmers that prefer the warmer water.
The Mercer Park Aquatic Center (MPAC) pool setpoint is consistently at 81 degrees and is
measured at the pool water return sensor. MPAC pool is programmed as a competitive pool,
hosting City High, Southeast Junior High, Iowa City Eels, and a lot of lap swimmers. Some
prefer the water to be a bit cooler to avoid getting overheated as they are working out.
Barker reflects that both staff and the Commission have heard about the pool water being too
cold or too warm but clarifies that the water temperature can feel as though it is warmer or cooler
than nonnal due to the significance that ambient temperature can have on perceived water
temperature. The exact same water temperature can feel cooler on a hot day and wanner on a
cold day because of the surrounding air temperature. The larger the difference between air and
water temperature, the more pronounced the perceived temperature change will be when entering
and exiting the pool. Barker explains that there are several factors that can influence ambient
temperature, the most essential being heating and ventilation systems. The indoor pool
dehumidification system helps a lot at MPAC, which the RAL pool does not have. Another large
influence on the indoor air temperature are the number and size of glass windows in a
natatorium, especially on a sunny day.
Parks and Forestrv- Sunerintendent—T'vler Baird
Parks: Supt. Baird addresses that there have been requests for port -a -potties in some of the parks,
specifically the nature areas with longer trails. Baird acknowledges that the request has been
received but explains that there is no additional funding in the budget to support more portable
restroom units in the parks. Baird says that there are a few units throughout the parks system that
are utilized throughout the year but clarifies that there are weekly fees for the use and cleaning of
each unit. Baird says that there have been units occasional at Hickory Hill in years past, but that
these were for the use of contractors during construction projects.
Supt. Baird announces that the playground in Upper City Park has been removed in preparation
to repurpose the land for the footprint of the City Park Pool project. Baird says that the
playground is a newer one and will remain in storage until it can be utilized in Lower City Park
sometime next year.
Supt. Baird says that there is a small spot of playground surfacing that needs repairs at Willow
Creek Park. Baird expects this to be complete in the upcoming week but clarifies that it is
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 9 of 12
weather and temperature dependent. Baird adds that the repairs are much smaller than the recent
surfacing repairs at the Ped Mall Playground.
Supt. Baird says that staff have been working recently at the Terry Trueblood Recreation Area,
clearing the trails, pushing back honeysuckle form the trail edge, and addressing the Ash trees
that are failing in the area.
Supt. Baird is excited for upcoming work on the natural areas at Sand Prairie. Parks is working
with several agencies, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Nature Conservancy, Johnson County
Conservation, and the state expert, Dr. Tom Rosberg from Drake University to complete
inventory on what is in the natural area and determining what can be done to maintain it. Baird
says that there was a recent woody brush removal, and a prairie burn the previous Spring with
more burns schedule for the upcoming Spring.
Supt. Baird announces that the water has been shut off across the Parks system but explains that
the restrooms and water fountains were open longer than usual this year due to higher
temperature.
Supt. Baird states that the Parks & Forestry division is back to full capacity for permanent staff.
Baird is happy for this before the winter processes start with snow removal and other seasonal
work.
REAP Grants: Supt. Baird discusses the Resource Enhancement And Protection (REAP) Grant
that is funded through the Department of Natural Resources. Baird says there are a few ongoing
projects funded through previously received REAP grants, of which include work done at
Ryerson's Woods, Hickory Hill Park, and at the Ned Ashton House. Baird explains that these
grants wouldn't be on the list of CIPs as there are externally funded.
Baird announces that the Parks & Forestry division has received conditional approval for the
grant application submitted for 2024. This grant would go towards work on the Sycamore Green
way, including vegetation clearing, clearing and maintenance of the areas, and stormwater bio-
cell spaces which would recharge the area with the local stormwater. Baird explains that staff
want the area functioning as well as it can before any further development can happens in the
next 10-15 years. Baird says that the grant received is worth $200,000 and scored the second
highest of any applications received for the year.
Trees: Supt. Baird announces that 550 street trees were planted by staff, for a total of 997
between Parks and Streets in the Iowa City area. An additional 150 seedlings were planted at
Ryerson's woods, ranging in height from 1-2 feet.
Dir. Seydell Johnson points out the rare occasion for three division heads of the department to be
present together at a Commission meeting. Seydell Johnson expresses her profound thanks to
them all, including Russ Buffington, the Cemetery Mgr. who is not present at the meeting.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 10 of 12
CHAIRS REPORT:
Chairman Hachtman expresses his gratitude, saying that it has been both an honor and a privilege
to serve as the Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Hachtman is grateful for both
the facilities and parks and all the hard work and dedication that goes into these.
COMMISSION TIME/SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS:
Commissioner Broege asks who the contact is regarding deer crossing signs, explaining that
there has been a growing population of deer on the East Side, especially crossing Scott
Boulevard. Dir. Seydell Johnson responds that all things deer related can go to Assistant City
Manager Kirk Lehman.
Commissioner Broege, if he is not granted a new term on the Commission, says that is has been a
pleasure to work with staff and the rest of the Commission.
Vice Chairman Moore thanks Recreation Program Supervisor Malory Smysor for the use of the
Ned Ashton House. Moore says that she been taking yoga classes at the Ashton House on
Tuesday nights and states that it has been an increasingly welcoming space, with new signs or
arts and crafts every week.
Commissioner McPherson expresses her pleasure to be a part of this community and is very
proud, bragging about it wherever she goes.
Commissioner Morelli says that is cool to hear about the programming going on with new events
always around the corner. Morelli refers to the September commission meeting, during which
there was an agenda item for the baseball fields. Morelli recalls Michael Muhlenbruch, a member
of the public who has spoken and asks if staff had any update of following up with Muhlenbruch.
Dir. Seydell Johnson responds that Supt. Barker and herself had sat down and met with
Muhlenbruch who had much of the same information he had given the Commission, wanting to
know if there are ways to get more involved in the fields. Barker says that they had spoken on
field access priority and where Little Hawks would land in that order, having more field access,
and when it was reserved. Seydell Johnson says that they had answered Muhlenbruch's questions
and got him to a better understanding. Morelli asks if the fields have officially transferred to the
28e agreement. Seydell Johnson responds that the agreement has not yet been signed and is
going back and forth between the attorneys for the School District attorneys and the city but
expects it to be on a Council agenda before the end of the calendar year. Morelli asks why Parks
and Recreation is interesting in giving up space that is in demand by the community to the
School District exclusively. Seydell Johnson explains that staff's records did not show as high of
a level of demand and that the department is in a strong partnership with the School District on
several facilities, playing into that already established relationship. Staff believes that they can
fulfill the amount of use that has been seen in recent years with the two remaining Mercer Park
fields, the field at Happy Hollow Park, and the fields at City Park. Seydell Johnson says that the
department would love to see and will continue to advocate for more fields in the future, but as
an overall good partner and neighbor to the School District, found it to be a good move for the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 11 of 12
partnership. Morelli asks if this move was budgetary, where the School District would be
responsible for maintenance or budgetary decision. Seydell Johnson responds that the School
District will be responsible for Fields 1 & 4, they will start paying for the use of Fields 2 & 3
when they reserve them, and they will pay an amount each year into the future Capital
Improvements of spaces surrounding Fields 1 & 4. For the duration of the agreement, the city
will not be responsible for Fields 1 & 4 but will remain responsible for Fields 2 & 3, the common
areas, the pathways, and the Park amenities in the surrounding area.
Commissioner Stanton thanks both Parks and Recreation staff for allowing the County Office to
use their facilities and spaces as voting locations for the General Election during the week prior.
Stanton asks about the status of the patch repair on the Ped Mall playground. Supt. Baird
confirms that the patches have been applied and that staff are just waiting for the curing to finish.
Commissioner Stanton asks, now that the conservation bond was passed, is there any opportunity
for that money to assist in any trail projects. Supt. Baird believes that the trails would have to be
in the County proper but that there are opportunities around that may be adjacent to Parks such
has Ryerson's Woods. Baird adds that the most recent trail project to be funded that way was
used to connect to the larger trail system but clarifies that trail replacement wouldn't fall under
this.
ADJOURNMENT:
Moved by Morelli, second by Stanton to adiourn the_meetina at 6:35 p.m. Motion passed
b-Q (Forbes, Haves. and Recker absent).
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
November 13, 2024
Page 12 of 12
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
NAME
en
N
N
R
N
N
N
N
N
7
N
N
N
N
N
TERM
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
0
N
EXPIRES
Aaron
12/31/24
X
X
O/E
NM
X
NM
NM
X
X
O/E
NM
X
Broe e
Missie
12/31/25
X
X
X
NM
O/E
NM
NM
X
O/E
X
NM
O/E
Forbes
Alex
12/31/24
X
X
X
NM
X
NM
NM
O/E
X
X
NM
X
Hachtman
Virginia
12/31/27
*
X
X
NM
X
NM
NM
X
X
O/E
NM
O/E
Hayes
Rachel
12/31/26
X
X
X
NM
X
NM
NM
X
O/E
O/E
NM
X
McPherson
Connie
12/31/25
X
X
O/E
NM
X
NM
NM
X
X
X
NM
I X
Moore
Brian
12/31/25
X
X
O/E
NM
X
NM
NM
X
X
X
NM
X
Morelli
Caleb
12/31/26
X
O/E
X
NM
O/E
NM
NM
X
O/E
X
NM
X
Recker
Alex
12/31/27
X
X
X
NM
O/E I NM
NM
O/E
X
X
NM
X
Stanton
KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = No meeting
LQ = No meeting due to lack of quorum * = Not a member during this meeting
Parks &
Recreation
• a •
Recreation Program Supervisor - STEAM, Arts & Nature
The Recreation Program Supervisor oversees the programming and staffing of the following core areas:
Pottery Studio — Adults & Teen
Includes Pottery Studio pass participants, ceramics programs and workshops for all ages. Participants
learn basic clay techniques to form pottery such as plates, bowls, and vases. Supervises Pottery Studio
area and makes maintenance requests as needed.
Arts & Crafts — Adults & Youth
Includes various types of programs that inspire creativity amongst beginning or continuing participants
of the arts. Also occasionally includes some theater and improv courses. Supervises Craft Room and
makes maintenance requests as needed.
Nature Education — Adults & Youth
Includes nature crafts, outdoor exploration and engagement, and informational sessions with partner
organizations about Iowa's ecosystems. Updates geocache placement throughout Iowa City and
manages the online account. Includes oversight of the annual Freeze Fest event at TTRA Lodge that
utilizes many partnerships in an effort to share outdoor winter activity options with the community.
Gardening — Adults & Youth
Supervises Discovery Garden area and makes maintenance requests as needed. Programs for classes and
activities that educate and engage participants on growing their gardening skills. Offers weekly Garden
Parties during the summer for families. Partners closely with Backyard Abundance for additional
educational efforts towards edible gardening.
STEAM — Youth
Includes hands-on programs that encourage youth to explore and inspires inquiry and critical thinking.
Robotics, music and engineering -based projects are some of the topics covered in this program area.
Also includes partnerships with local organizations to host larger STEAM events during the winter
months and the STEAM activity area during the Halloween Carnival.
Rollerskating — All Ages
Includes oversight of open rollerskating sessions on Saturday evenings, skill learning clinics and rentals of
the gym for rollerskate parties. Supervises maintenance of the skate inventory.
Camps — Youth
Includes oversight of summer camp and half -day art/STEAM camps. This role involves frequent
communication with the parents of participants in resolving requests and addressing behavioral issues.
Coordinates with AIR Program Supervisor on inclusion assistance, when needed.
PLAY Daze — Youth
Programs for the weekly PLAY Daze drop -in program at various parks during the summer. This serves as
a neighborhood outreach effort to bring recreational opportunities to children and their families where
they reside.
220 S. Gilbert Street • Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1632 • 319-356-5100
RECREATION
Nolan Butkowski
Recreation Assistant ' 19
Brad Barker
Recreation Superintendent'18
Matt Eidahl
Assistant Recreation
Superintendent'00
1I
Bill Lane Maiory Smysor Jeff Sears
Joyce Carroll _ Caylea Housh Communications �, Adaptive & Adult & Youth
Social &Cultural Aquatics Inclusive
Supervisor'79 Supervisor '19 &Special Events Recreation � Recreation
Supervisor '24 Supervisor '22 Supervisor '08
Item Number: M.
CITY OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
January 21, 2025
Senior Center Commission: November 21
Attachments: Senior Center Commission: November 21
Approved Minutes
November 21, 2024
MINUTES
SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION
November 21, 2024
Room 311, Iowa City Senior Center
Members Present: Nancy Ostrognai, Betty Rosse, Jay Gilchrist, Warren Paris
Members Absent: Ross Taylor, Lee McKnight, Angie McConville
Staff Present: LaTasha DeLoach, Kristin Kromray
Others Present: Cynthia Dietz
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by McKnight at 4.00 PM.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE OCTOBER 17, 2024 MEETING:
Motion: To accept the minutes from the October 17, 2024. Motion carried on
a 4/0 vote. Ostrognai/Paris
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
Cynthia Dietz, a retired GIS librarian, spoke to the commission regarding an
online map project that will explore information and resources in the Iowa City
area. Cynthia would like to partner with the Senior Center to do a program and/or
gather information from local seniors. Commissioners suggested she speak with
Senior Center programming staff regarding her ideas.
OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW:
DeLoach noted the Senior Center has hired three new evening and weekend
employees. The afternoon receptionist position is still currently open, but an offer
to a potential new employee has been given.
The door and window project is still slated to occur next year. Ostrognai
requested a larger handicap button at Washington St. Paris noted an opener that
is activated by a hand wave might be an option.
1
Approved Minutes
November 21, 2024
DeLoach reported staff will be revising the code of conduct and locker policies.
Updated policies will likely be in next month's commission packet for review. The
Senior Center has seen an increase in the number of unhoused community
members utilizing the Senior Center. Updated policies will address some of the
items Senior Center staff have been navigating. The Senior Center is working
more closely with Shelter House and the police department as well as starting to
attend a City work group dedicated to unhoused community members. Rosse
noted that there have been some concerns on the Monday Table to Table
distribution and that people have reported to her that they appreciate a police
officer coming through on Mondays. Gilchrist asked if the police are well
resourced. DeLoach noted that Iowa City police officers do receive de-escalation
training and that when calling the Senior Center can request an officer who is
versed in mental health issues. Additionally, there is the Mobile Crisis Unit that
can be contacted for situations that do not warrant a police call.
DeLoach noted that locker pricing has not been increased in many years. It
currently costs $5/month. The recreation center has day use only lockers that are
50 cents a day. The Senior Center will be putting forward a request to increase
the cost of a locker to $15/month. This will put it more in line with the recreation
department pricing.
DeLoach noted that the Table -to -Table distribution continues to evolve and will
soon involve a registration process. She will be keeping an eye on how it is going
and make assessments as things move forward.
Rosse reported that Ecumenical Towers residents are interested in having an
ATM at the Senior Center. As of now, DeLoach understands the desire to have
one, but it is unlikely to happen soon. DeLoach noted that this could be
something that could be discussed during the interior renovation discussions.
There was discussion that there are multiple ATMS's within a block. Gilchrist also
noted that there might be a concern with older adults and scamming that could
occur.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION:
Ostrognai mentioned that a community member asked if congregate meals would
come back to the Senior Center. DeLoach gave a brief history of that meal
program and that it had always been an outside organization who had run that
program. She noted that once a kitchen renovation is complete that there might
be more opportunities for meals at the Senior Center.
The Commission discussed the one application for the at large commission seat.
Motion: To appoint Mary McCall as the at large, non -Iowa City, Johnson
County representative. Motion carried on a 4/0 vote. Paris/Ostrognai
2
Approved Minutes
November 21, 2024
Gilchrist noted that he would like for other Senior Center staff members to meet
at future commission meetings.
Meeting Adjourned.
Approved Minutes
November 21, 2024
Senior Center Commission Attendance Record
12/21/23
1/18/24
2/15/202
3/21/24
4/18/24
5/16/24
6/20/24
7/18/24
8/15/24
9/19/24
10/17/202411/21/2204
Name
Term Expires
4
Betty
12/31/26
--
--
--
X
X
X
NM
NM
O/E
X
X
X
Rosse
Jay
12/31/25
O/E
NM
X
X
X
X
NM
NM
X
X
O/E
X
Gilchrist
Tasha
12/31/24
O
NM
O
O
O
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Lard
Angela
12/31/24
X
NM
X
X
X
O/E
NM
NM
X
X
X
O/E
McConville
Lee
12/31/27
X
NM
X
X
O/E
X
NM
NM
X
X
X
O/E
McKnight
Susan
12/31/23
X
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Mellecker
Nancy
12/31/26
X
NM
X
X
X
X
NM
NM
X
X
X
X
Ostrognai
Ross
12/31/24
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
O
X
O
O
Taylor
Warren
12/31/25
X
NM
O
X
X
X
NM
NM
O
X
O
X
Paris
Key: X =Present O =Absent O/E =Absent/Excused NM =No meeting -- = Not a member