Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ Agenda Packet 02.19.2025PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Wednesday, February 19, 2025 Formal Meeting – 6:00 PM Emma Harvat Hall Iowa City City Hall 410 E. Washington Street Agenda: 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Public Discussion of Any Item Not on the Agenda Development Items 4. Case No. REZ24-0016 Location: North of Melrose Ave. and East of Camp Cardinal Blvd. An application for a rezoning of approximately 7.2 acres of land from Interim Development Single-Family Residential (ID-RS) zone to Mixed Use (MU) zone. 5. Case No. REZ24-0001 Location: 900, 902, 906, and 908 N. Dodge St. and 905, 909, and 911 N. Governor St. An application for a rezoning of approximately 5.49 acres of land from Medium Density Single-Family Residential (RS-8) zone, High Density Single-Family Residential (RS-12) zone, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20) zone, and Multi-Family Residence (R3B) zone to Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20) zone and High Density Single-Family Residential (RS-12) zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD). 6. Consideration of meeting minutes: December 4, 2024 7. Election of Officers 8. Planning and Zoning Information 9. Adjournment If you will need disability-related accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact Anne Russett, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5251 or arussett@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs. Upcoming Planning & Zoning Commission Meetings Formal: March 5 / April 2 / April 16 Informal: Scheduled as needed. STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ24-0016 Parcel: 1007351003 Prepared by: Madison Conley Associate Planner Date: February 5, 2025 GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner/Applicant: St Andrew Presbyterian Church 140 Gathering Place Ln Iowa City, Iowa 52246 Contact Person: Michael Welch Shoemaker & Haaland 160 Holiday Rd Coralville, Iowa 52241 920-475-8060 mwelch@shoemaker-haaland.com Requested Action: Rezoning of 7.2 acres from Interim Development Single-Family Residential (ID- RS) zone to Mixed Use (MU) zone. Purpose: To rezone to a zone that allows development as opposed to the existing interim development zone. Location: East of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and north of Melrose Ave. Location Map: Size: 7.2 Acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Interim Development Single-Family Residential (ID-RS) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Religious/private group assembly uses, Low Density Single-Family 2 Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) South: Single-Family, Low Density Single- Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) East: Single-Family, Rural Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OP/RR-1) West: Highway 218, Governmental Purposes, Institutional Public (P2) Comprehensive Plan: Office Commercial Public Meeting Notification: Property owners and occupants within 500’ of the property received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. A rezoning sign was posted onsite at Camp Cardinal Blvd & Melrose Ave (Parcel 1007351003). District Plan: None File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: December 23, 2024 February 6, 2025 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The owner, St Andrew Presbyterian Church, is requesting approval for the rezoning of 7.2 acres from Interim Development Single-Family Residential (ID-RS) zone to Mixed Use (MU) zone for land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and north of Melrose Ave. Both Camp Cardinal Blvd and Melrose Ave are arterial streets which are in close proximity to Highway 218. Portions of the property’s northern edge border sensitive areas such as woodlands, wetlands, and regulated slopes, which are also found on the St Andrew Presbyterian Church property directly to the north. The IC2030 Comprehensive Plan’s future land use map originally identified this area appropriate for 2-8 Dwelling Units per Acre. In 2016, St Andrew Presbyterian Church submitted a Comprehensive Plan Amendment that changed the future land use designation from 2-8 Dwelling Units per Acre to Office Commercial (CPA16-00001, Res No. 16-129). The Office Commercial land use designation is assigned to areas intended to provide the opportunity for a large variety of commercial uses that serve a major segment of the community. The subject property is currently for sale. The owners have expressed an interest in rezoning to provide more clarity and certainty to future buyers regarding development potential. Attachment 3 includes the applicant submittal materials such as the Rezoning Exhibit and the Applicant Statement which describes the rationale behind the request. The applicant has used the Good Neighbor Policy and held a Good Neighbor Meeting on January 23, 2025. ANALYSIS: Current Zoning: The property is currently zoned ID-RS. The ID-RS zone provides for areas of 3 managed growth in which agricultural and other nonurban uses of land may continue until such time as the city is able to provide city services and urban development can occur. The land uses allowed in the ID-RS zone are limited. The only permitted use in the ID-RS zone is plant related agricultural. Detached single-family dwellings are allowed but require a minimum of 5 acres. Limited commercial uses are allowed and subject to use specific standards. For example, the ID-RS zone allows general and intensive animal related commercial uses; however, any outdoor facilities associated with these uses are required to be setback at least one hundred feet from any lot line. Proposed Zoning: The applicant is requesting that the property to be rezoned to the MU zone. The purpose of the MU zone is to provide a transition from commercial and employment centers to less intensive residential zones. The MU zone allows a mix of uses, including lower scale retail and office uses, and a variety of residential uses. This mix of uses requires special consideration of building and site design. Table 1 outlines the uses that are allowed in the MU zone, i.e. multi-family, office uses, community service, etc. The MU zone does not allow for drinking establishments (e.g. bars), quick vehicle servicing uses (e.g. gas stations and car washes), or any industrial uses. Table 1 – Uses Allowed in MU Zone Use Categories: Assisted group living PR Attached single-family dwellings PR Detached single-family dwellings P Detached zero lot line dwelling PR Duplexes PR Group Households PR Multi-family dwellings P Eating establishments S Office Uses—General & Medical/dental P Redemption center PR Alcohol sales oriented retail PR Hospitality oriented retail PR Personal Service oriented retail PR Sales oriented PR Tobacco sales oriented PR Community service-shelter S General community service S Daycare PR Educational facilities—General & Specialized PR Parks and open space PR Religious/private group assembly PR Communication transmission facility PR P = Permitted PR = Provisional S = Special exception Rezoning Review Criteria: Staff uses the following two criteria in the review of rezonings: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. 4 Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The Northwest Planning District does not have a district plan, so the proposed rezoning is reviewed using the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2016 changing the subject property’s land use designation from 2-8 dwelling units per acre to Office Commercial (CPA16- 0001). The resolution noted that the amendment was warranted due to the subject property’s close proximity to Highway 218. It also stated that the general principles of the Comprehensive Plan encourage buffers between residential development and major highways. The resolution also states that the CO-1 zone is an appropriate zone near residential neighborhoods and an appropriate transition to more intense uses. Although the resolution indicates CO-1 as an appropriate zoning designation for the subject property, staff finds that the proposed MU zone aligns with the intent of the comprehensive plan amendment, as well. Both the CO-1 zone and the MU zone allow residential and less intensive commercial uses. Similar to the CO-1 zone, the MU zone does not allow drinking establishments, quick vehicle servicing uses, and outdoor storage and display oriented retail. In addition, the MU zone does not allow drive-throughs. Furthermore, the following Comprehensive Plan goals and strategies are supported by the rezoning request: • Encourage compact, efficient development that is contiguous and connected to existing neighborhoods to reduce the cost of extending infrastructure and services and to preserve farmland and open space at the edge of the city. o Ensure that infill development is compatible and complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. • Encourage a diversity of housing options in all neighborhoods. o Ensure a mix of housing types within each neighborhood, to provide options for households of all types (singles, families, retirees, etc.) and people of all incomes. o Identify and support infill development and redevelopment opportunities in areas where services and infrastructure are already in place. The proposed rezoning aligns with the Comprehensive Plans goals that encourage infill development and a diversity of housing types throughout the community. The subject property is surrounded by developed land and the site is currently served by city services. In terms of housing diversity, the MU zone allows a diversity of housing types, including single-family, duplex, and multi- family residential. Compatibility with Existing Neighborhood Character: The land uses surrounding this property include St Andrews Presbyterian Church to the north, single-family residential to the east, multi- family residential to the northwest, and Highway 218 to the west. Generally speaking, the neighborhood is a mix of both single-family and multi-family residential, as well as institutional uses with the church. The neighborhood also includes a number of regulated sensitive features. The subject property, specifically, includes woodlands along the eastern portion of the property that abut the existing single-family homes in Walnut Ridge. Additionally, there is a 30’ pipeline easement that runs north and south along the eastern border of the subject property. No development would be allowed within this easement. Given the regulated sensitive features and the restrictions on development placed by the pipeline easement a natural buffer should remain between any development and the single-family land uses to the east. Furthermore, future development on the subject property must comply with the Mixed Use Site Development Standards that regulate the location of surface parking and require screening 5 between surface parking and neighboring properties. Buildings scale is also regulated, and articulation standards are required to ensure that buildings are broken up in modules. The purpose of these standards is to ensure that building sites are designed to be inviting for pedestrians by orienting buildings toward the street, requiring that buildings be constructed with street level storefront windows and clearly demarcated pedestrian entrances; and by requiring that parking be located away from the street and screened by landscaping. Regarding lighting, the mixed use zone is in the medium illumination district. This district would allow more lighting than a single-family zone; however, the light trespass standards require that lighting fixtures are shielded in such a say that the bulb is not directly visible from any adjacent residential use. Overall, the lighting standards regulate light fixture shielding, directional control, and height of fixtures to prevent light from one property extending beyond the property line onto adjacent properties. Staff finds the proposed rezoning request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and compatible with the existing neighborhood character. Transportation & Public Infrastructure: The property has access from Camp Cardinal Blvd, which contains a median that limits ingress and egress to the site. Therefore, staff is recommending a condition that the Owner reconstruct the median to allow full access to the site. This will also require the construction of a dedicated left-turn lane on Camp Cardinal Blvd. Sensitive Areas: The subject property contains regulated sensitive features. A sensitive areas development plan is not required at the time of rezoning. A sensitive areas development plan will be required either at subdivision or site plan review. At that time, the applicant will be required to submit a sensitive areas development plan showing regulated sensitive features, proposed impacts, and construction limit lines. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ24-0016, a proposed rezoning to rezone 7.2 acres of the property located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and north of Melrose Ave (Parcel Number 1007351003) from ID-RS zone to MU zone subject to the following condition: • Prior to issuance of a building permit the Owner shall reconstruct the median to allow access and also construct a dedicated left-turn lane on Camp Cardinal Blvd subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Applicant Submittal Materials Approved by: _________________________________________________ Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services ATTACHMENT 1 Location Map Ke n n e d y P k w y Camp Cardinal Blvd 2 1 8 S b t o M e lr o s e A v e Galwa y C t Acorn Ct Ga l w a y C i r Hi g h w a y 2 1 8 Gathering Place L n M a c l a n C ir M a c l a n C t G a l w a y D r B u t t e r n u t C t Deer Creek Rd G a t h e r i n g P l a c e L n D o n e g a l P l B utternutLn C a m p C a r d i n alRd Butternut L n 2 1 8 N b t o M e l r o s e A v e Melrose Ave MelroseAveto218Sb MelroseAveto218Nb REZ24-0016 Camp Cardinal Blvd & Melrose Aveµ Prepared By: Rachael Schaefer Date Prepared: January 2025 = 0 0.05 0.10.03 Miles An application to rezone 7.3 acres of land from Interim Development Single-Family Residential (ID-RS) to Mixed Use (MU). ATTACHMENT 2 Zoning Map Ken n e d y P k w y Camp Cardinal Blvd 2 1 8 S b t o M e lr o s e A v e Galwa y C t Acorn Ct Ga l w a y C i r Hi g h w a y 2 1 8 Gathering Place L n M a c l a n C i r M a c l a n C t Ga lw a y D r B u t t e r n u t C t Deer Creek Rd G a t h e r i n g P l a c e L n D o n e g a l P l B utternutLn C a m p C ardinal R d Butternut Ln 2 1 8 N b t o M e l r o s e A v e Melrose Ave K e n n e d y P k wy MelroseAveto218Sb Melros e A v e t o 2 1 8 N b REZ24-0016 Camp Cardinal Blvd & Melrose Aveµ Prepared By: Rachael Schaefer Date Prepared: January 2025 = 0 0.05 0.10.03 Miles An application to rezone 7.3 acres of land from Interim Development Single-Family Residential (ID-RS) to Mixed Use (MU). ATTACHMENT 3 Applicant Submittal Materials—Rezoning Exhibit & Applicant Statement AP 2012061 7.20 Ac 313,428 SF =1" WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEET 0 50 100 200150 100' 24380 AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2012061 TRIANGLE LAND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH ST ANDREW CO P Y R I G H T P R O T E C T I O N U N D E R F E D E R A L L A W ( T I T L E 1 7 , U . S . C O D E ) Ab o v e l a w l i m i t s t h e u s e o f t h i s d o c u m e n t ( d r a w i n g / d a t a ) t o t h i s s p e c i f i c p r o j e c t o n l y , a n d d u p l i c a t i o n w h o l e o r i n p a r t f o r u s e o n o t h e r t h a n t h i s p r o j e c t i s p r o h i b i t e d . Z: \ 2 0 2 4 \ 2 4 3 8 0 \ D R A W I N G S \ B A S E \ 2 4 3 8 0 C - L I N E . D W G , RE Z O N I N G , 12 / 1 2 / 2 0 2 4 2 : 0 9 : 2 4 P M ISSUED DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECK BY: APPROVED BY: PROJECT NUMBER:SHEET NUMBER REV SHEET TITLEPROJECTOWNER NO.REVISION DATE Shoemaker HaalandPRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 12-12-24 MJW KJB MJW 00CITY SUBMITTAL #1 12-12-24 1REZONING EXHIBIT REZONING EXHIBIT AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2012061 IOWA CITY, IA LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPLICANT INFORMATION PROPERTY OWNER ST ANDREW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 140 GATHERING PLACE LANE IOWA CITY, IA 52246 CIVIL ENGINEER MICHAEL J. WELCH, PE SHOEMAKER AND HAALAND 160 HOLIDAY ROAD CORALVILLE, IA 52241 319-351-7150 ZONING INFORMATION CURRENT ZONING ID-RS PROPOSED ZONING MU CAMP CARDINAL BLVD MELROSE AVENUE CA M P C A R D I N A L R D U S 2 1 8 N B U S 2 1 8 S B AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2012061 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 57 PAGE 8 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL CONTAINS 7.20 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT BK 341 PG 246 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTEXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT NORTH B O U N D 2 1 8 O N R A M P AP 2012061 7.20 Ac 313,428 SF 15' MAX. SETBACK =1" WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEET 0 30 60 12090 60' SITE INFORMATION: SITE DESCRIPTION AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2012061 PLATTED AREA 7.20 ACRES DEVELOPABLE AREA 4.35 ACRES ZONING CURRENT ID-RS PROPOSED MIXED USE - MU SETBACKS FRONT MIN 5 FEET MAX 15 FEET SIDE 5 + 2*FEET REAR ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY 20 FEET MULTI-FAMILY 5 + 2*FEET * ADD 2' FOR EACH STORY ABOVE 2 BUILDING BULK HEIGHT 35 FEET BUILDING COVERAGE 50 % UNIT DENSITY ALLOWED EFFICIENCY & 1-BEDROOM 2,725 SF 2-BEDROOM 2,275 SF 3-BEDROOM 2,275 SF CAMP CARDINAL BLVD 20' REAR SETBACK C1.00ISSUED DATE:REVISION: SITE AND ZONING ANALYSIS SHEET NUMBER:PROJECT NO: ISSUED DATE: PROJECT MANAGER: REVISION: PROJECT NAME: CLIENT: SHEET NAME: ENGINEER: REVISION LOG: REV DESCRIPTION DATE © ---CLIENT REVIEW 10-23-24 1102 WELCH ---10-23-2024 TRIANGLE LAND AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2012061 ST ANDREW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH MELROSE AVENUE C A M P C A R D I N A L B L V D DEVELOPMENT RELATED: PRESERVED WOODLAND BUFFERED WOODLAND IMPACTED WOODLAND CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS LEGEND: WOODLANDS DEVELOPMENT-RELATED IMPACTS LOCATION AREA (SF) 529 210 2,831 14,739 1,081 6,616 IMPACTED AREA 26,006 18.4% BUFFER AREA 50,992 36.1% TOTAL EXISTING AREA 153,996 PERCENT RETAINED 45.4% PER IOWA CITY CODE, MU ZONE MUST RETAIN AT LEAST 10% WOODLANDS. WOODLANDS WITHIN THE BUFFER AREAS DO NOT COUNT TOWARDS RETENTION VALUES. IMPACTED WOODLANDS C.1 C.2 C.3 C.4 C.5 C.6 C.1 C.2 C.3 C.4 C.5 C.6 C.6 5' MIN. SETBACK 30' PIPELINE EASEMENT CONSTRUCTED SLOPES IN THIS AREA ARE NOT SUBJECT TO SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED TO EASTERN EDGE OF EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT 179'± 120'± Project No. 24380 Page 1 December 13, 2024 APPLICANT’S STATEMENT FOR REZONING St. Andrew Presbyterian Church Parcel Number 1007351003 Please accept the following Applicant Statement submitted on behalf of St Andrew Presbyterian Church. St Andrew Presbyterian Church has owned the property located near the intersection of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and Melrose Avenue since 2009. This property is identified as Parcel Number 1007351003 or as Auditor’s Parcel 2012061. This property was acquired along with the property located at 140 Gathering Place Lane where the St Andrew Presbyterian Church is located. The parcel is physically separated from the Gathering Place Lane property by a waterway and a wooded ravine. St Andrew Presbyterian Church is seeking a Mixed Use (MU) zoning designation for the property. The property is currently zoned Interim Development Single-Family (ID-RS). According to the City Code, the ID-RS zone is intended “to provide for areas of managed growth in which agricultural and non-urban uses of land may continue until such time as the city is able to provide city services and urban development can occur.” This property is surrounded by developed properties and city services are currently available. St Andrew previously pursued a comprehensive plan amendment to allow for a commercial use on the property. Since making that change to the comprehensive plan, the market for commercial properties has changed and St Andrew has not been able to attract a buyer interested in developing the property for a commercial use. The Mixed Use is a commercial zone that is intended to “provide a transition from commercial and employment centers to less intensive residential zones. The MU zone permits a mix of uses, including lower scale retail and office uses, and a variety of residential uses. This mix of uses requires special consideration of building and site design.” The Mixed Use zone is well situated at this location to provide a transition from Highway 218 to the west and the large-lot residential properties within Walnut Ridge to the east. St. Andrew has not determined a final use nor do they plan to be the developer of the property. Their goal in rezoning the property is to remove a barrier for a potential buyer and position the property to the ready for development when a buyer is identified. The site is currently served by city water and sanitary sewer. Any future development will need to comply with applicable city codes, including the sensitive area ordinance and storm water management. Thank you for your consideration of this rezoning application. Sincerely, Michael J. Welch, PE STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ24-0001 911 N Governor St & Surrounding Properties Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner Date: February 5, 2025 Updated February 14, 2025 for February 19, 2025 Meeting GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant/Owner: TSB Holdings, LLC tracy@barkalowhomes.com Co-Applicant: The City of Iowa City Neighborhood & Development Services Department 319-356-5230 Contact Person: Jon Marner MMS Consultants j.marner@mmsconsultants.net Requested Action: Rezoning to High Density Single- Family Zone and Medium Density Multi-Family Zone with a Planned Development Overlay Purpose: Redevelopment of vacant and underutilized properties along N. Governor St. Location: 900 N. Dodge St, 902 N. Dodge St., 905 N. Governor St, 906 N. Dodge St., 908 N. Dodge St., 909 N. Governor St., and 911 N. Governor St. Location Map: Size: 5.49 acres Existing Land Use; Zoning: Single-family, two-family, and multi-family residential and vacant office building; Medium Density Single-Family Residential (RS-8), High Density Single-Family Residential (RS-12), 2 Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20), and Multi-Family Residence (R3B) Surrounding Land Use; Zoning: North: Single-family and two-family; RS-12 and RS-8 South: Happy Hallow Park and single-family, Neighborhood Public (P1) and RS-8 East: Single-family, RS-8 West: Single-family, RS-8 Comprehensive Plan: 2-8 DU/Acre and 16-24 DU/Acre District Plan: Central District Plan Neighborhood Open Space District: C1 Public Meeting Notification: Property owners and occupants within 500’ of the property received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Two rezoning signs were posted along N. Governor St. and two were posted along N. Dodge St. File Date: January 3, 2025 45 Day Limitation Period: February 17, 2025 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, TSB Holdings, LLC, is requesting approval for the rezoning of approximately 5.49 acres of land from Medium Density Single-Family Residential (RS-8) zone, High Density Single- Family Residential (RS-12) zone, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20) zone, and Multi-Family Residence (R3B) zone to Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20) zone and High Density Single-Family Residential (RS-12) zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD). The City is joining the property owner as a co-applicant on this rezoning. The proposed development would allow for the demolition and replacement of buildings along N. Governor St, including the existing, vacant commercial office building. The Preliminary Planned Development Overlay and Sensitive Areas Development Plan, Building Elevations, Rezoning Exhibit, and Applicant’s Statement are attached. [Attachments 2, 3, 4, and 5] The western portion of the subject property is part of the Subdivision of the SE ¼ Section 3 Township 79 Range 6 Final Plat approved in 1873. The eastern portion of the property is part of the Bacon’s Subdivision of Blk 1 Dewey’s Addition also approved in 1873. The zoning of the property in question has been the subject of significant past litigation. A portion of the subject property was at issue in a 1987 decision of the Iowa Supreme Court, Kempf v. City of Iowa City, 402 N.W.2d 393 (Iowa 1987). In that case, a developer had purchased a four-acre tract comprised of six lots--Lots 8-10 along Governor Street and Lots 49-51 along Dodge Street. At the time, all of these lots were zoned R3B, a classification permitting office buildings and high- density multi-family residential units. The developer had completed construction of an office building and had begun construction of an apartment building when the City revoked the building permit for the apartment building. The City subsequently rezoned the property to permit commercial office and multi-family residential uses on portions of the tract, while limiting the remainder to single-family and duplex development. The court concluded that the decision to rezone the undeveloped portions of the property to permit only single-family and duplex units was unreasonable due to the economic 3 unfeasibility of such limited development. As a result of this litigation, Lots 10, 49, 51, and part of Lot 50 reverted to the R3B zoning classification in effect in 1978. This classification was to remain in effect until a use had been established on any of the lots, after which time further development or redevelopment of that lot would be subject to current zoning regulations. Since the court ruling no uses have been established on the lots in question. In 2011, the City received a rezoning application (REZ11-00016) for a portion of the subject property along N. Governor Street to rezone the property from CO-1 (Commercial Office) zone to RM-12 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential) zone. At the time rezoning would have allowed approximately 18 multi-family residential units. This rezoning received a significant amount of opposition from neighborhood residents and failed at Council by a vote of 0-6. After the failed rezoning attempt the City Council directed staff to examine the comprehensive plan’s land use policy vision for the property and explore designating the property to no longer allow multi- family residential uses. The City initiated a comprehensive plan amendment (CPA12-00004) which proposed an amendment to the Central District Plan to change the future land use designation from Low to Medium Density Multi-Family to Single-Family and Duplex residential for properties located at 905, 909, and 911 N. Governor Street and property between 906 N. Dodge and 910 N. Dodge Street. This comprehensive plan amendment was accompanied by three City initiated rezonings (REZ12-00016, REZ12-00018, and REZ12-00019). Ordinance 13-4518 rezoned land from R3B and CO-1 to RS-12 (High Density Single-Family Residential) zone. After the rezoning the property owner submitted a site plan proposing a multi- family residential building. At the time, Lots 10, 49, and 51 remained undeveloped. The City denied this site plan because multi-family uses are not allowed in the RS-12 zone. The owner appealed the decision to the Board of Adjustment. The Board upheld staff’s decision, and the owner appealed this decision to district court seeking to invalidate the rezoning. The case eventually made its way to the Iowa Supreme Court as TSB Holdings, LLC v. Board of Adjustment for City of Iowa City, 913 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2018). The court found that the rezoning ordinance was a lawful exercise of the City’s zoning authority. However, the court held that the Kempf decision prohibited the City from enforcing the new zoning ordinance as to Lots 10, 49, and 51. As a result, the property owner was permitted to move forward with construction of multi-family housing on these lots consistent with the former R3B zoning classification. To date, this development has not occurred. In short, these properties have a long and complicated zoning history. At present the properties remain a mix of both single-family and multi-family zoning. Some of the multi-family zoning that applies to the property is the zoning designation from the 1970s (R3B) determined by the courts. The City is acting as a co-applicant for this rezoning for several reasons. First, due to the hodge podge of zoning designations this rezoning helps to ensure a cohesive development pattern as opposed to that which would be allowed under current zoning. Second, the proposed rezoning would require compliance with the City’s modern zoning regulations as opposed to zoning regulations adopted in the 1970s. Third, the City Council’s Strategic Plan speaks to working on establishing partnerships and collaborations within the community, particularly in the interest of advancing housing goals. Good Neighbor Policy: The applicant held a good neighbor meeting on August 13, 2024. Approximately 20 individuals attended the meeting. A summary of the meeting is attached. [Attachment 6] In addition to the good neighbor meeting, City staff, representatives of MMS Consultants, and three neighbors met to discuss additional concerns on September 25, 2024. ANALYSIS: 4 Current Zoning: The subject property is zoned Medium Density Single-Family Residential (RS- 8) zone, High Density Single-Family Residential (RS-12) zone, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20) zone, and Multi-Family Residence (R3B) zone. The existing R3B zoning is a zoning designation from the 1970s. See Figure 1. Properties zoned RM-20 allow multi-family residential. Properties zoned RS-12 and RS-8 allow single-family and duplex residential. RS-12 also allows townhome style multi-family up to six units attached. The maximum height in these zones is 35’. The R3B zone also allows multi-family residential at a minimum lot area per unit of 750 square feet. This equates to approximately 58 dwelling units per acre. Given the land area zoned R3B the existing zoning would allow a maximum of 84 dwelling units. The maximum height in the R3B zone is 45’ and 3 stories. See Table 1. Table 1. R3B Zoning Summary Minimum Lot Area Per Unit Approximate Maximum Density Maximum Height 750 square feet 58 du/ac 45’ and 3 stories Proposed Zoning: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property to High Density Single-Family (RS-12) zone and Medium Density Multi-Family (RM-20) Zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD). The OPD is required due to impacts to sensitive areas. No waivers from development standards are being requested. Figure 1. Current Zoning 5 The owner is proposing to demolish and replace the buildings along N. Governor St., which will include the demolition of two single-family homes and the vacant office building to accommodate the development of two multi-family residential buildings each containing 42 units. A total of 84 units are proposed, which is the maximum allowable number of units under the current R3B zoning. The maximum density in the OPD/RM-20 zone is 24 dwelling units per net acre. See Table 2. There is no redevelopment planned along N. Dodge St. at this time; however, redevelopment is possible. Any future redevelopment must demonstrate substantial compliance with the Preliminary OPD Plan as is defined by the zoning ordinance. The maximum allowable height in the proposed zoning designations in 35’. Additionally, development of multi-family residential in the RM-20 zone will require compliance with the City’s modern multi-family site development standards (which would not be required of development under the 1970 R3B zoning). The multi-family site development standards address the location of parking, landscaping between surface parking and neighboring properties, the demarcation of building entrances, and building articulation to avoid monotonous facades. Since the property is located within the Central Planning District, the proposed development is also subject to additional standards that regulate architectural design and building materials. Table 2. OPD/RM-20 Zoning Summary Minimum Lot Area Per Unit Maximum Density Maximum Height n/a 24 du/net acre 35’ Since the proposed zoning does not follow existing parcel boundaries, staff is recommending a condition that no building permit shall be issued for the proposed Lot 1 until the City Council approves a final plat resubdividing the subject property to conform to the proposed zoning boundaries. General Planned Development Approval Criteria: Applications for Planned Development rezonings are reviewed for compliance with the standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Zoning Code, except for sensitive areas developments that comply with all underlying zoning and subdivision regulations. Since the proposed planned development is required due to sensitive Figure 2. Proposed Zoning 6 areas and no modifications are being requested, the proposed rezoning is subject to the standard rezoning review criteria: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan: The proposed rezoning is reviewed using the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Central District Plan. The Future Land Use Map of the IC2030 plan identifies much of the subject property as appropriate for multi-family residential development at 16-24 dwelling units per acre. The area along N. Governor St is identified as appropriate for residential development of 2-8 dwelling units per acre. The Central District Plan identifies the area as appropriate for Single-Family and Duplex Residential, Open Space, and Low to Medium Density Multi-Family with a development density of 8-24 dwelling units per acre. The Future Land Use Map functions as a conceptual future vision. Both plans envision this area as allowing multi-family development. See Figures 3 and 4. Furthermore, the rezoning is supported by plan goals and strategies that are outlined below. The IC2030 Plan also include a number of goals and strategies that support the proposed rezoning: Land Use Goals and Strategies: • Encourage compact, efficient development that is contiguous and connection to existing neighborhoods to reduce the cost of extending infrastructure and services and to preserve farmland and open space at the edge of the city. o Ensure that infill development is compatible and complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. Housing Goals and Strategies: • Encourage a diversity of housing options in all neighborhoods. o Ensure a mix of housing types within each neighborhood, to provide options for households of all types (singles, families, retirees, etc.) and people of all incomes. o Identify and support infill development and redevelopment opportunities in areas where services and infrastructure are already in place. Figure 3. IC2030 Future Land Use Map Figure 4. Central District Plan Future Land Use Map 7 Environmental Goals and Strategies: • Recognize the essential role our land use policies play in preserving natural resources and reducing energy consumption. o Encourage compact, efficient development that reduces the cost of extending and maintaining infrastructure and services. o Discourage sprawl by promoting small-lot and infill development. Parks and Open Space Goals and Strategies: • Improve overall access to and awareness of parks. Goal 1 of the Central District Plan’s Housing and Quality of Life element states “Promote the Central District as an attractive place to live by encouraging reinvestment in residential properties throughout the district and by supporting new housing opportunities” Although the proposed redevelopment is not a reinvestment in existing residential property it is an investment in the neighborhood and will allow the for the removal of the blighted, vacant office building and allow for the development of much needed housing units. The Central District Plan also includes a component related to open space. It envisions the possible expansion of Happy Hollow Park to the west and a bit to the north, including one parcel on the subject property. The area of the subject property identified in the plan as appropriate for open space is zoned R3B. Given the court rulings protecting development rights and the current zoning designation, expanding the public park in this manner is unrealistic. The topography also makes expanding the park to the north challenging as any northern expansion would likely be inaccessible to members of the public. Finally, the Central District Plan also states the following: “Another pocket of multi-family development in the northern part of the district along Dodge Street is zoned R3B, which is an obsolete zoning designation no longer used in the City Code. This area should be rezoned to a valid designation such as RM-20, which acknowledges the density of the existing multi-family development on the property”. In summary, the proposed rezoning to OPD/RM-20 with a small portion rezoned to OPD/RS-12 is consistent with the land use policy direction of the City’s adopted plans. The plans envision the development of multi-family residential in this area, make note of the importance of accommodating a diversity of housing types to meet a variety of needs, and highlight the benefits of infill development for environmental and infrastructure reasons. Compatibility with Existing Neighborhood Character: In terms of the surrounding neighborhood, Happy Hollow Park is directly south of the proposed development. Single-family homes are located across the N. Governor Street right-of-way to the east. To the north is a mix of duplex and other residential uses. To the west of the proposed development on the subject property are two existing multi-family residential buildings containing 12 and 29 units respectively. To the south of the existing multi-family buildings is a duplex (to be converted to a single-family home) with single-family homes further to the south. The neighborhood is a mixture of housing types ranging from detached single-family homes to larger scale apartment buildings. The major amenity for residents is Happy Hollow Park. The Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Play was developed to fit into the existing mixture of residential buildings that the neighborhood contains. It proposes two multi-family buildings along N. Governor Street. Each building contains 42 dwelling units for a total of 84 dwelling units. The two block-scale buildings front N. Governor St. in a manner that aims to reduce their visual impact from the public right-of-way. The northern building is positioned in such a way that the shortest end of the building fronts N. Governor St. The width of this end of the building is 70 feet wide compared 8 with the length of the building, which is ~236 feet. Additionally, the southern building is positioned at an angle, which allows the longest side of the building to be positioned further away from N. Governor St. This site layout also provides for a large open space area south of the building (north of Happy Hollow Park) for the residents of the building. The proposed development must comply with the private open space standards outlined in section 14-2A-4E of the Zoning Code. The proposed multi- family buildings with 84 units containing 132 bedrooms requires 1,320 square feet of private usable open space (10 square feet per bedroom). The proposed development shows adequate private open space featuring an outdoor seating area. Excluding the designated private open space area, much of the remaining area on the proposed Lot 1 will be used to retain stormwater and protect sensitive features. Both buildings are proposed to meet the 35’ maximum height limit in the zone. No waivers from the height standard have been requested. Parking is accommodated on surface lots that are located behind the building, as well as internal structured parking. In terms of landscaping, the proposed development would maintain 15 existing mature trees along the southern property line abutting Happy Hollow Park. Additionally, 54 new trees will be planted on the site, including 9 street trees along N. Governor St. The landscaping plan also shows that the surface parking will be screened to neighboring property owners to the south and west. Along N. Dodge St. there are two existing duplexes and two existing multi-family residential buildings. The plans show that the Owner plans to convert the southern duplex at 900 N. Dodge St. on the proposed Lot 2 to a single-family home. This is needed in order to meet the density requirements of the zone. Staff is recommending a condition that prior to Final Plat approval that the duplex is converted. Although there are no plans for redevelopment along N. Dodge St. (with the exception of the duplex conversion at 900 N. Dodge St.), the rezoning would allow redevelopment in the future. Any future redevelopment of the proposed Lot 2 will be required to substantially comply with the Preliminary OPD Plan. The rezoning would not allow any more dwelling units than currently exist. Additionally, the existing development pattern provides a transition from the detached single-family homes to the south to the existing apartment buildings to the north. Future redevelopment would need to ensure that this transition is maintained similar to the existing context. Transportation and Public Utilities: The proposed rezoning is bordered on the west by N. Dodge St. and on the east by N. Governor St. Both are one-way streets with N. Dodge St. running south and N. Governor St. running north. Both streets are also considered arterial streets per the City’s streets plan and are highways under the authority of the Iowa Department of Transportation. Regarding capacity, 2023 data from the Iowa DOT shows an ADT (average daily traffic) of 5,600 for N. Governor St. The theoretical capacity is approximately 15,000 to 18,000 per day. Transportation planning staff have reviewed the plans and have found that there is sufficient capacity on N. Governor St. to accommodate the new development. The current public right-of- way varies in width and is less than a typical arterial right-of-way width. As for N. Dodge St. the existing conditions will not be changing with the proposed rezoning. That said, 2023 data from the Iowa DOT shows an ADT of 6,200 along N. Dodge St. Like N. Governor St., N. Dodge St. can accommodate between 15,000 to 18,000 per day. The site is also served by Iowa City Transit’s North Dodge Route. Transit stops are located adjacent to the subject property along N. Dodge St. heading south and along N. Governor St. heading north. 9 Staff is recommending two conditions related to the transportation system. First, that public right- of-way along N. Governor St. and easements be dedicated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to allow the installation of a 5’ sidewalk. Second, that a temporary construction easement be granted on the western 10’ of the subject property abutting N. Dodge St. This temporary construction easement is needed to for the Dodge Street reconstruction project that is planned between Governor and Burlington Streets. The project will be done in partnership with the Iowa DOT and includes new street pavement, sidewalk, utility improvements and other associated work. Both conditions will be addressed at final platting. The site also has access is the City’s existing sewer and water system. An 18” sanitary sewer trunk line runs through the property. Public Works staff has reviewed the plans and have no concerns regarding sanitary sewer capacity for this area as it would relate to this project. Staff is recommending a condition that the existing water services for 902, 904, and 906 N. Dodge St. that are tapped off of the water main in N. Governor Street shall be abandoned, and new services for 902, 904, and 906 N. Dodge Street shall be installed that are tapped off of the water main in N. Dodge Street subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject property contains regulated slopes and groves of trees. The applicant submitted a Preliminary Sensitive Areas Development Plan that shows critical slopes being impacted beyond the 35% which can be approved administratively and triggering the OPD rezoning. Specifically, the proposed development would impact 86% of the critical slopes on the property. Although groves of trees are present on the subject property no woodlands exist; and therefore, the proposed development is not subject to the woodland retention requirement. Neighborhood Open Space: According to section 14-5K of the City code, the dedication of public open space or fee in lieu of land dedication is addressed at the time of final platting for residential subdivisions. Based on the proposed rezoning, the Owner will be required to dedicate approximately 0.067 acres to the City or pay a fee in-lieu of land dedication. The Owner has requested to pay a fee in-lieu of a public open space dedication. Staff has accepted their request for a payment in-lieu of land dedication. Storm Water Management: The Preliminary OPD Plan includes an area to accommodate storm water. Public Works staff will review all stormwater management plans as part of the site plan review process. Correspondence: As of the morning of February 14, 2025, staff had received three emails from residents expressing concerns regarding the rezoning. Staff received one email in support of the rezoning. See Attachment 7. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, a public hearing will be scheduled for consideration by the City Council. The Owner also has three other pending applications related to this rezoning: 1) A final plat application which will be reviewed by City Council; 2) A site plan application which will be reviewed by City staff, and 3) A design review application which will be reviewed by City staff. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ24-0001, a proposal to rezone approximately 5.49 acres of land between N. Dodge and N. Governor Streets to OPD/RS-12 (approximately 0.17 acres) and OPD/RM-20 (approximately 5.32 acres) subject to the following conditions: 10 1. In consideration of the City’s rezoning the subject property, Owners agree that no building permit shall be issued for Lot 1 as shown on the Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan until the City Council approves a final plat resubdividing the subject property to conform to the zoning boundaries established by the rezoning ordinance to which this Agreement is attached. 2. Prior to the approval of the Final Plat, the Owner shall convert the existing duplex as shown on Lot 2 of the Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan to one dwelling unit to ensure compliance with the maximum density standards of the zone. 3. As part of Final Plat approval, the Owner shall dedicate public right-of-way and easements along N. Governor Street consistent with what is shown on the Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 4. As part of Final Plat approval, the Owner shall grant a temporary construction easement on the western 10’ of the subject property abutting N. Dodge Street. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for Lot 1 as shown on the Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan, the existing water services for 902, 904, and 906 N. Dodge Street that are tapped off of the water main in N. Governor Street shall be abandoned, and new services for 902, 904, and 906 N. Dodge Street shall be installed that are tapped off of the water main in N. Dodge Street subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location & Zoning Maps 2. Preliminary Planned Development Overlay and Sensitive Areas Development Plan 3. Building Elevations 4. Rezoning Exhibit 5. Applicant’s Statement 6. Summary Report for Good Neighbor Meeting 7. Correspondence Approved by: _________________________________________________ Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services ATTACHMENT 1 Location & Zoning Maps N Summit St De w ey S t N G o v e r n o r S t N D o d g e S t 2ʹͶǦͲͲͲͳ ͻͳͳ . ‘˜‡”‘” –”‡‡–q Prepared By: Rachael Schaefer Date Prepared: January 2025 = 0 0.02 0.040.01 Miles An application to rezone approximately 5.49 acres of land from Medium Density Single-Family Residential (RS-8), High Density Single-Family Residential (RS-12), Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20), and Multi-Family Residence (R3B) to RM-20 (~5.32 acres) and RS-12 (~0.17 acres) with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD). N D o d g e S t N Summit St Dewe y St N G o v e r n o r S t N D o d g e S t 2ʹͶǦͲͲͲͳ ͻͳͳ . ‘˜‡”‘” –”‡‡–q Prepared By: Rachael Schaefer Date Prepared: January 2025 = 0 0.02 0.040.01 Miles An application to rezone approximately 5.49 acres of land from Medium Density Single-Family Residential (RS-8), High Density Single-Family Residential (RS-12), Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (RM-20), and Multi-Family Residence (R3B) to RM-20 (~5.32 acres) and RS-12 (~0.17 acres) with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD). N D o d g e S t ATTACHMENT 2 Preliminary Planned Development Overlay and Sensitive Areas Development Plan N O R T H G O V E R N O R S T R E E T \ H I G H W A Y # 1 DEWEY'S ADDITION BLOCK 3 DEWEY'S ADDITION BLOCK 12 NORTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION ORIGINAL TOWN OF IOWA CITY OUTLOT 13 BRICKWOOD HOLLOW NO R T H D O D G E S T R E E T \ H I G H W A Y #1 SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 3-T79N-R6W SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3-T79N-R6W D (319) 351-8282 LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS CIVIL ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS www.mmsconsultants.net 1917 S. GILBERT ST. PER CITY COMMENTS12-18-2024 SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA 12-11-2024 CAT ADP CAT 9200-006 4 PER CITY COMMENTS01-28-2025 SITE LAYOUT AND DIMENSION PLAN 1 1"=30' NOT TO SCALE LOCATION MAP IOWA CITY, IOWA SCARLETT POINTPRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OPD SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY, IOWA PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 APPLICANT: TSB HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 1490 IOWA CITY, IA 52244 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 1"=30' 3 15 30 PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING PCC PAVEMENT PCC PAVEMENT PCC PAVEMENT PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS DEVELOPMENT CHARACTERISTICS EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 900 & 900 1 2 N DODGE ST EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING G: \ 9 2 0 0 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 O . d w g , 1 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 1 9 : 1 4 A M N O R T H G O V E R N O R S T R E E T \ H I G H W A Y # 1 DEWEY'S ADDITION BLOCK 3 NORTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION ORIGINAL TOWN OF IOWA CITY OUTLOT 13 BRICKWOOD HOLLOW SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3-T79N-R6W D (319) 351-8282 LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS CIVIL ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS www.mmsconsultants.net 1917 S. GILBERT ST. PER CITY COMMENTS12-18-2024 SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA 12-11-2024 CAT ADP CAT 9200-006 4 PER CITY COMMENTS01-28-2025 SITE GRADING EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND SWPPP 2 1"=20' CW PR DL D GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 1"=20' 2 5 10 15 20 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OPD SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY, IOWA PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 APPLICANT: TSB HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 1490 IOWA CITY, IA 52244 O CNE ALLSM IOWATHE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PER IDOT STANDARD ROAD PLAN TC-202 OR SUDAS 8030-104 AND CITY OF IOWA CITY REQUIREMENTS AT ALL TIMES DURING WORK WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR ANY REQUIRED RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. CW PR DL PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 736.00 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE = 736.00 G: \ 9 2 0 0 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 O . d w g , 1 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 1 9 : 1 6 A M N O R T H G O V E R N O R S T R E E T \ H I G H W A Y # 1 DEWEY'S ADDITION BLOCK 3 NORTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION ORIGINAL TOWN OF IOWA CITY OUTLOT 13 BRICKWOOD HOLLOW SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3-T79N-R6W (319) 351-8282 LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS CIVIL ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS www.mmsconsultants.net 1917 S. GILBERT ST. PER CITY COMMENTS12-18-2024 SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA 12-11-2024 CAT ADP CAT 9200-006 4 PER CITY COMMENTS01-28-2025 SITE SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN 3 1"=20' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 1"=20' 2 5 10 15 20 PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OPD SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY, IOWA PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 APPLICANT: TSB HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 1490 IOWA CITY, IA 52244 O CNE ALLSM IOWATHE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL PER IDOT STANDARD ROAD PLAN TC-202 OR SUDAS 8030-104 AND CITY OF IOWA CITY REQUIREMENTS AT ALL TIMES DURING WORK WITHIN PUBLIC R.O.W. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR ANY REQUIRED RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. G: \ 9 2 0 0 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 O . d w g , 1 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 1 9 : 1 8 A M N O R T H G O V E R N O R S T R E E T \ H I G H W A Y # 1 DEWEY'S ADDITION BLOCK 3 ORIGINAL TOWN OF IOWA CITY OUTLOT 13 BRICKWOOD HOLLOW SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3-T79N-R6W (1) GT (1) GD (1) UM (1) PO (1) LT (1) GT (1) LT (1) UM (1) QR (1) UM (1) QR (1) UM (1) QB (1) GT (1) GT (1) GD (1) QB (1) QB (1) QB (1) UM (1) PO (1) QB (1) QR (1) GD (1) QR (1) UM (1) PO (1) UM (1) PO (1) LT (1) GD (1) GT (1) QR (1) LT (1) QB (1) QR (1) GD (1) PO (1) QR (1) GD (1) UM (1) LT (1) GT (1) PO (1) GD Hackberry Elm Maple Elm Cherry Hackberry Walnut Hackberry Hackberry Locust Locust Elm Locust Cherry Locust (4) SB (4) TM (9) VT (9) TM (6) VT (6) SB (1) HQ (5) HQ (3) SM (5) TC (3) SM (5) TC (9) PV (2) JV(5) CS (9) PV (2) JV (5) CS (9) PV (2) JV (1) CS (3) CS (3) HQ 1 STREET TREE FOR EVERY 40 LF OF FRONTAGE. -369.86 / 40 = 9 REQUIRED 9 PROVIDED 1 TREE FOR EVERY 550 SF OF TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE OF THE LOT. -33,225.34 / 550 = 60 REQUIRED 45 PROPOSED (15 EXISTING) SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME INSTALL SIZE COMMENT MATURE H. X W. TREES GT 6 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Skycole` TM Skyline Thornless Honey Locust 2" Cal.B&B 45` x 35` GD 7 Gymnocladus dioica 'Espresso'Espresso Kentucky Coffeetree 2" Cal.B&B 70` x 45` LT 5 Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree 2" Cal.B&B 80` x 50` PO 6 Platanus occidentalis American Sycamore 2" Cal.B&B 90` x 70` QB 6 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2" Cal.B&B 60` x 60` QR 7 Quercus rubra Red Oak 2" Cal.B&B 70` x 70` UM 8 Ulmus x `Morton Glossy` TM Triumph Elm 2" Cal.B&B 60` x 40` SHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES & PERENNIALS CS 14 Cornus sericea `Farrow` TM Arctic Fire Red Twig Dogwood 24" Ht.Container 4` x 4` HQ 9 Hydrangea quercifolia `Sike`s Dwarf`Sike`s Dwarf Oakleaf Hydrangea 24" Ht.Container 4` x 4` JV 6 Juniperus virginiana `Grey Owl`Grey Owl Juniper 18" Ht.Container 3` x 6` PV 27 Panicum virgatum `Prairie Fire`Prairie Fire Switch Grass 24" Ht.Container 4` x 3` SB 10 Spiraea x bumalda `Goldflame`Goldflame Spirea 18" Ht.Container 3` x 4` SM 6 Syringa meyeri `Palibin`Dwarf Korean Lilac 24" Ht.Container 4` x 5` TM 13 Taxus x media `Tauntonii`Taunton`s Yew 18" Ht.Container 3` x 5` TC 10 Tsuga canadensis `Moon Frost`Moon Frost Hemlock 18" Ht.Container 3` x 3` VT 15 Viburnum trilobum `Bailey Compact`Bailey`s Compact Viburnum 30" Ht.Container 6` x 5` PLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS -TURF GRASS -PLANTING BED LANDSCAPE LEGEND (319) 351-8282 LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS CIVIL ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS www.mmsconsultants.net 1917 S. GILBERT ST. PER CITY COMMENTS12-18-2024 SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA 12-11-2024 CAT ADP CAT 9200-006 4 PER CITY COMMENTS01-28-2025 LANDSCAPE AND FINAL STABILIZATION PLAN 4 1"=20' PRELIMINARY SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OPD SCARLETT POINT IOWA CITY, IOWA PREPARED BY: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 1917 S. GILBERT STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 APPLICANT: TSB HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 1490 IOWA CITY, IA 52244 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 1"=20' 2 5 10 15 20 G: \ 9 2 0 0 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 O . d w g , 1 / 3 1 / 2 0 2 5 9 : 1 9 : 2 0 A M ATTACHMENT 3 Building Elevations SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FRONT (STREET) ELEVATION1SELECT STRUCTURAL 5'0 10'15'20'25' 1ST FLOOR 0'-0" 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR TRUSS BEARING TOP OF TRUSS TOP OF PARAPET MODULE "AA"MODULE "AA"MODULE "BB" 22'-8"22'-8"24'-8" 5' - 0 " 2'-6"4"4" 4" 8" 8" 12 " NOTE: SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT 7' - 0 " 3'-0"3'-0" 4" 4"4" 5' - 0 " 2'-6"4" 4" 8" 2'-6"4" 2' - 8 " 2' - 8 " 8" 8"4" 12 " 8" 12 " 4" 4" 4" 4" (1) WINDOW (2) WINDOWS ENTRANCE DOORS 34'-0" 37'-0" 21'-6 3/4" 30'-8" 10'-9 1/2" AP P R O V E D B Y : JO B D A T E : JO B N O : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : KR S 1- 3 0 - 2 0 2 5 23 - 5 2 4 GO O S E T O W N A P A R T M E N T S ( 4 2 U N I T ) 91 1 N . G O V E R N O R S T R E E T IO W A C I T Y I O W A TR A C Y B A R K A L O W SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SIDE YARD ELEVATION2SELECT STRUCTURAL GOOSETOWN APARTMENTS 911 N. GOVERNOR STREET (42 UNITS) 1-30-2025 10'0 20'30'40'50' L.L. PARKING - 11'-0" TOP OF TRUSS 34'-0" TOP OF PARAPET 37'-0" MODULE "A"TOWER ELEMENTMODULE "B"MODULE "A"MODULE "B"MODULE "A"MODULE "B"MODULE "A"TOWER ELEMENT MECHANICAL SCREENING - BEYOND (NOT VISIBLE FROM STREET LEVEL)MECHANICAL SCREENING - BEYOND (NOT VISIBLE FROM STREET LEVEL) 3RD FLOOR 21'-6 3/4" TRUSS BEARING 30'-8" 34'-10"12'-3"24'-4"34'-10"24'-6"35'-0"24'-4"34'-6"12'-3" 5' - 0 " 2'-6" 12 " 2' - 8 " 12 " 12 " 2' - 8 " 4"4" 4" 8" 12 " 12 " 12 " 2' - 8 " 2ND FLOOR 10'-9 1/2" NOTE: SEE CIVIL SITE PLAN FOR AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT 8"8" 12 " 8" 4" 4" 4"4" 4" 8" 8" 8"8" 12 " 8" 4"4" 4" 4" 4" 4" 8" 8" 4"8"8" 12 " 8" 4"4" 4" 4" 4" 12 " 4"4" 8" 8" 8" 12 " 5' - 0 " 2'-6"4" 4" 8" 2'-6"4" (2) WINDOWS(1) WINDOW 1ST FLOOR 0'-0" (A) = HARDIE BOARD TRIM "STONE" EXTERIOR FINISHES SCHEDULE (G) = CEDAR WOOD (STAIN & SEAL) (B) = HARDIE BOARD PANEL "PEARL GRAY" (F) = HARDIE SHAKER SHINGLE SIDING "SAGE" (H) = MASONRY BRICK VENEER "COUNTRY LANE RED" (D) = HARDIE BOARD LAP SIDING "STONE" (E) = HARDIE BOARD LAP SIDING "PEARL GRAY" (C) = PREFINISHED FASCIA & DECORTIVE BRACKETS "QUARTZ" (L) = PRE-FINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING & ARCH. METAL ROOF "BLACK" (J) = MASONRY ROCK FACE C.M.U. BLOCK "QUARTZ" (K) = POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE FOUNDATION - PAINT "QUARTZ" TH E S E P L A N S A R E P R O P E R T Y O F S E L E C T S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C TH E S E P L A N S P E R T A I N T O T H I S S P E C I F I C P R O J E C T A N D L O C A T I O N . DO N O T M O D I F Y , A L T E R O R D U P L I C A T E / C O P Y W I T H O U T P R I O R A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . PA G E N O . SH E E T T I T L E DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E BY 60 6 1 4 T H A V E S W CE D A R R A P I D S , I A 5 2 4 0 4 31 9 - 3 6 5 - 1 1 5 0 # RE V I S I O N S 24 3 5 E K I M B E R L Y R D . S U I T E 2 4 0 S BE T T E N D O R F , I A 5 2 7 2 2 56 3 - 3 5 9 - 3 1 1 7 A- 2 0 0 EX T E R I O R E L E V A T I O N S SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" FRONT PORTCH ELEVATION3SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" APARTMENT ENTRY ELEVATION4 ITALINATE FEATURES <1> TOWERS <2> PROJECTING EAVES <3> BRACKETS/CORBELS <4> ELEBORATE CORNICE <5> FRIEZE BOARD <6> PANEL MOLDING <7> LARGE TRIM <8> TALL NARROW WINDOWS <9> DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS <10> SEGMENTED WINDOW <11> WINDOW PEDIMENT/HOOD <12> WINDOW TRIM <14> BALCONIES <15> PROJECTING PORCH <16> FLAT ROOF <17> LOW SLOPE HIP ROOF <18> BRICK <19> CLAPBOARD SIDING <20> CORNER BOARDS <21> INSET PANELS <22> PORCH COLUMNS <23> RECESSED ENTRY <24> RECTANGULAR BAYS <25> PAIRED DOORS (ARCH GLASS) <26> WATER TABLE / MASONRY FOUNDATION <27> BALUSTRADED BALCONIES & PORCHES <28> STONE STEPS <29> ASYMMETRICAL FACADES <30> BALANCED FACADES <31> RICH TEXTURED FACADE <32> SCENIC GROUNDS (LANDSCAPING) <1><1> <1><1><1> <2> <2><2><2> <2> <2> <2> <3><3><3> <3><3> <3><3> <5> <5><5><5><5><5> <4> <4><4> <5><5> <4> <6><6><6> <6><6> <3><3><3> <3><3> <3><3><3> <7> <7> <7><7><7> <7><7> <7> <8> <8> <8> <8> <8><8><8> <8> <9> <9> <9><9> <9><9> <9> <3> <10> <10> <10> <10> <10><10> <11> <11> <11> <11> <11> <11> <11> <11><11><11> <12> <12><12> <12> <12> <12><12> <12> <12> <12> <12> <12> <4> <4> <4> <3> <14><14> <14> <14> <14> <14> <15> <15> <15> <16> <16> <16><16> <16> <17> <17> <17> <18> <18> <18> <18> <18> <18> <18> <18> <18> <19> <19> <19> <19> <19> <19> <19> <19> <19> <20> <20> <20> <20> <21><21><21> <21><21> <22> <22> <22> <23> <23> <23> <24><24><24><24> <24> <25> <25> <26> <26> <26> <26><26><26><26><26> <27> <27> <27> <27><27><27><27> <27> <29><29><29> <30> <28><28> <31> <31> <31><31><31> <32> <32> <32> <32><32><32> ITALIANATE STYLE A POPULAR AMERICAN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE IN THE LATE 19TH CENTURY BORROWED FROM CLASSICAL ENGLISH DESIGNERS INSPIRED BY VILLAS AND PALACES OF ITALY. CHARACTERIZED OFTEN AS A ROMANTICIZED INTERPRETATION OF ITALIAN RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE. TYPICAL FEATURES INCLUDE FLAT OR LOW PROFILE ROOFS, LARGE OVERHANGING EAVES, DECORATIVE BRACKETS, CORNICE BOARD WITH LARGE FREEZE BAND, TOWERS, TALL NARROW WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH TRIM ALONG WITH BALUSTRADED BALCONIES AND PORCHES WITH SLENDER COLUMNS AND BRICK & CLAPBOARD SIDING. THIS BUILDING STYLE BECAME HIGHLY ADAPTIVE TO INCLUDE HOUSES AND ESTATES, HOTELS, APARTMENT BUILDINGS, BANKS, RETAIL AND OFFICE BUILDINGS TYPICALLY TWO STORIES ON UP TO FIVE BY THE END OF THE 1800'S. IN LINE WITH THE TRADITION OF ITALIANATE ARCHITECTURE, OUR PROPOSED DESIGN SEEKS TO HONOR THE ESTHETIC PRINCIPALS OF THE STYLE AND PROVIDE A FUNCTIONAL MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING COMPLEX. BY INCORPORATING ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, ORNAMENTATION, SPECIAL DETAILING, AND APPROPRIATE PROPORTIONS, WE AIM TO HARMONIZE WITH THE HISTORIC DISTRICT AND PAY TRIBUTE TO BEAUTY OF THE ITALIAN DESIGN. SPECIAL ATTENTION HAS BEEN MADE TO MAKE THE BUILDING ENTRIES APPROACHABLE AND THE SCALE OF THE BUILDING BROKEN DOWN INTO ROWHOUSE LIKE MODULES. THE OPEN SPACE, SCREENED PARKING, WALK WAYS, SITTING AREA, AND LANDSCAPING WILL MAKE A GOOD NEIGHBOR TO THE COMMUNITY. 236'-10" [PROPERTY LINE SIDE] 70 ' - 0 " STAIR ELEVATOR CORRIDOR Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1ST FLOOR PLAN (PRELIMINARY)101 15,625 SQ.FT. STAIR 35'-0"24'-4"34'-8"12'-3"24'-4"35'-0"24'-4"34'-8"12'-3" 22 ' - 8 " 24 ' - 8 " 22 ' - 8 " 70 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 8 " 24 ' - 8 " NORTH BLDG.1 NORTH BLDG.2 SPRINKLER ROOM 1-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT.1-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT.1-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT. 1-BEDROOM APT.2-BEDROOM APT. 1-BEDROOM APT.2-BEDROOM APT. 1-BEDROOM APT.2-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT.PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH 22 ' - 8 " ADA ZERO ENTRY FRONT PORCH 24'-4" PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH PORCH 6" 12'-3"10'-2"14'-0" 2' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 6 " 10'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"14'-0"10'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"14'-0"10'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"14'-0"10'-2"12'-3" 6' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " MODULE "A"TOWER ELEMENTMODULE "B"MODULE "A"MODULE "B"MODULE "A"MODULE "B"MODULE "A"TOWER ELEMENT MO D U L E " A A " MO D U L E " A A " MO D U L E " B B " 8'-6" 6" 6" 8'-6" AP P R O V E D B Y : JO B D A T E : JO B N O : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : KR S 1- 3 0 - 2 0 2 5 23 - 5 2 4 GO O S E T O W N A P A R T M E N T S ( 4 2 U N I T ) 91 1 N . G O V E R N O R S T R E E T IO W A C I T Y I O W A TR A C Y B A R K A L O W STAIR STAIR ELEVATOR 9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4" 3233 PAINTED PARKING LINES & STALL NUMBERS (TYP.) 293031 28 9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4" 26 2527 18'-8"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4" 9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4" 13 14 PAINTED PARKING LINES & STALL NUMBERS (TYP.) 10 11 1209 9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"9'-4" 0706 08 9'-4"9'-4"9'-4"22'-3"9'-4"9'-4" 04 05030102 22'-3" 11'-8" 18 19151617 20 21 23 2224393836353734 VAN PARKING ADA PARKING BIKE RACKS PARKING 11'-8" 3'-7"11'-8" 6" 3'-7" Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" LOWER LEVEL PLAN (PRELIMINARY)001 16,342 SQ.FT. NORTH BLDG.1 NORTH BLDG.2 236'-10" [PROPERTY LINE SIDE] 12'-3"12'-3" 70 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 8 " 24 ' - 8 " 22 ' - 8 " 235'-10" 70 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 8 " 24 ' - 8 " 22 ' - 8 " 6" 24 ' - 8 " 22 ' - 2 " 22 ' - 2 " OVERHEAD DOOR 4041 34'-6"14'-0"45'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"48'-8"10'-8"24'-2" 8'-6" 9'-0" 11'-8" 24 ' - 8 " 22 ' - 8 " 22 ' - 8 " BIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACK BIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACKBIKE WALL RACK 12'-3"12'-3"13'-6"14'-0"45'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"48'-8"10'-8"24'-2"20'-0"1'-0" TH E S E P L A N S A R E P R O P E R T Y O F S E L E C T S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C TH E S E P L A N S P E R T A I N T O T H I S S P E C I F I C P R O J E C T A N D L O C A T I O N . DO N O T M O D I F Y , A L T E R O R D U P L I C A T E / C O P Y W I T H O U T P R I O R A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . PA G E N O . SH E E T T I T L E DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E BY 60 6 1 4 T H A V E S W CE D A R R A P I D S , I A 5 2 4 0 4 31 9 - 3 6 5 - 1 1 5 0 # RE V I S I O N S 24 3 5 E K I M B E R L Y R D . S U I T E 2 4 0 S BE T T E N D O R F , I A 5 2 7 2 2 56 3 - 3 5 9 - 3 1 1 7 A- 1 0 0 LO W E R L E V E L & 1 S T F L O O R P L A N AP P R O V E D B Y : JO B D A T E : JO B N O : DR A W N B Y : CH E C K E D B Y : KR S 1- 3 0 - 2 0 2 5 23 - 5 2 4 GO O S E T O W N A P A R T M E N T S ( 4 2 U N I T ) 91 1 N . G O V E R N O R S T R E E T IO W A C I T Y I O W A TR A C Y B A R K A L O W 236'-10" [PROPERTY LINE SIDE] 70 ' - 0 " STAIR ELEVATOR CORRIDOR Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2ND & 3RD FLOOR PLAN (PRELIMINARY)102 15,625 SQ.FT. STAIR 35'-0"24'-4"34'-8"12'-3"24'-4"35'-0"24'-4"34'-8"12'-3" 22 ' - 8 " 24 ' - 8 " 22 ' - 8 " 70 ' - 0 " 22 ' - 8 " NORTH BLDG.1 NORTH BLDG.2 MECH ROOM 1-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT.1-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT.1-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT. 1-BEDROOM APT.2-BEDROOM APT. 1-BEDROOM APT.2-BEDROOM APT. 1-BEDROOM APT.2-BEDROOM APT. 2-BEDROOM APT.DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK 22 ' - 8 " 24'-4" 3 SEASON SCREENED PORCH 6" 12'-3"10'-2"14'-0" 2' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 6' - 6 " 10'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"14'-0"10'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"14'-0"10'-4"14'-0"10'-4"10'-8"14'-0"10'-2"12'-3" 6' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 8' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 6"6"6"6"6"6"2' - 0 " 6"2' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 2' - 0 " 1' - 6 " 1' - 6 " MODULE "A"TOWER ELEMENTMODULE "B"MODULE "A"MODULE "B"MODULE "A"MODULE "B"MODULE "A"TOWER ELEMENT MO D U L E " A A " MO D U L E " A A " MO D U L E " B B " 8'-6" 6" 8'-6" 3 SEASON SCREENED PORCH 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6' - 0 " 6" 6" 3 SEASON SCREENED PORCH 3 SEASON SCREENED PORCH 3 SEASON SCREENED PORCH 3 SEASON SCREENED PORCH 3 SEASON SCREENED PORCH 24 ' - 8 " ROOF (BELOW) TH E S E P L A N S A R E P R O P E R T Y O F S E L E C T S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R I N G , L L C TH E S E P L A N S P E R T A I N T O T H I S S P E C I F I C P R O J E C T A N D L O C A T I O N . DO N O T M O D I F Y , A L T E R O R D U P L I C A T E / C O P Y W I T H O U T P R I O R A U T H O R I Z A T I O N . PA G E N O . SH E E T T I T L E DE S C R I P T I O N DA T E BY 60 6 1 4 T H A V E S W CE D A R R A P I D S , I A 5 2 4 0 4 31 9 - 3 6 5 - 1 1 5 0 # RE V I S I O N S 24 3 5 E K I M B E R L Y R D . S U I T E 2 4 0 S BE T T E N D O R F , I A 5 2 7 2 2 56 3 - 3 5 9 - 3 1 1 7 A- 1 0 2 2N D & 3 R D F L O O R P L A N ATTACHMENT 4 Rezoning Exhibit (319) 351-8282 LAND PLANNERS LAND SURVEYORS CIVIL ENGINEERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 MMS CONSULTANTS, INC. ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS www.mmsconsultants.net 1917 S. GILBERT ST. 12-2-2024 PER RRN REVIEW - RLW IOWA CITY JOHNSON COUNTY IOWA 11-30-2024 JDM RLW RRN IOWA CITY 9200-006 1 1380 ZONING EXHIBIT 01-28-2025 per city comments -jdm 1 1"=50' PROPOSED ZONING PARCEL #1 (OPD/RM20) GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 1"=50' 5 25 50 PROPOSED ZONING PARCEL #2 (OPD/RS12) REZONING EXHIBIT IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA 231,638 SF 5.32 AC 50 49 12 11 10 9 8 7 51 BACONS SUBDIVISIONSUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 3-T79N-R6W N89°18'10"E 172.08' S89°33'04"W758.91' S00°13'35"E 4.49' N00°55'46"W 46.06' S 2 8 ° 3 6 ' 4 4 " E 1 8 6 . 7 7 ' S0 0 ° 4 5 ' 4 5 " E 18 9 . 7 0 ' 6 6 . 5 3 ' N O R T H G O V E R N O R S T R E E T \ H I G H W A Y # 1 DEWEY'S ADDITION BLOCK 3 DEWEY'S ADDITION BLOCK 12 NORTHRIDGE SUBDIVISION ORIGINAL TOWN OF IOWA CITY OUTLOT 13 BRICKWOOD HOLLOW 50 NO R T H D O D G E S T R E E T \ H I G H W A Y # 1 48SUBDIVISION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 3-T79N-R6W SOU T H E A S T Q U A R T E R OF T H E SO U T H E A S T Q U A R T E R OF SE C T I O N 3 - T 7 9 N - R 6 W DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #1 (OPD/RM20) BEGINNING at the Southeast Corner of Lot 12 of Bacon's Subdivision, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Book 1 at Page 5 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S89°33'04"W, along the South Line of said Bacon's Subdivision, and the South Line of Lots 51, and 50 of the Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter Section 3-T79N-R6W, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Book 1 at Page 1 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office, 758.91 feet, to its intersection with the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of North Dodge Street; Thence N00°55'46"W, along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line, 46.06 feet; Thence N25°57'16"E, along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line, 273.89 feet; Thence N89°23'45"E, 130.27 feet; Thence N00°36'51"W, 66.71 feet, to a Point on the North Line of Lot 49 of said Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter Section 3-T79N-R6W; Thence N89°37'57"E, along said North Line, 246.17 feet, to the Northeast Corner thereof, and a Point on the West Line of Lot 7 of said Bacon's Subdivision; Thence S00°13'35"E, along said West Line, 4.49 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof, and the Northwest Corner of Lot 8 of said Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter Section 3-T79N-R6W; Thence N89°18'10"E, along the North Line of Said Lot 8, a distance of 172.08 feet, to the Northeast Corner thereof, and a Point on the Westerly Right-of-Way Line of North Governor Street; Thence S28°36'44"E, along said Westerly Right-of-Way Line, 186.77 feet; Thence S00°45'45"E, along said Westerly Right-of-Way Line, 189.70 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Rezoning Parcel #1 contains 5.32 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. N2 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 27 3 . 8 9 ' N2 5 ° 5 7 ' 1 6 " E 75 . 0 3 ' N89°37'57"E 96.71'N89°37'57"E 246.17' N89°23'45"E 130.27' N0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 1 " W 66 . 7 1 ' S0 0 ° 3 6 ' 5 1 " E S89°23'45"W POINT OF BEGINNING REZONING PARCEL #1 POINT OF BEGINNING REZONING PARCEL #2 DESCRIPTION - REZONING PARCEL #2 (OPD/RS12) BEGINNING at the Northwest Corner of Lot 49 of the Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter Section 3-T79N-R6W, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Book 1 at Page 1 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence N89°37'57"E, along the North Line of said Lot 49, a distance of 96.71 feet; Thence S00°36'51"E, 66.71 feet; Thence S89°23'45"W, 130.27 feet, to a Point on the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of North Dodge Street; Thence N25°57'16"E, along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line, 75.03 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Rezoning Parcel #2 contains 0.17 Acre, and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. 7,597 SF 0.17 AC G: \ 9 2 0 0 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 \ 9 2 0 0 - 0 0 6 Z . d w g ATTACHMENT 5 Applicant’s Statement December 31, 2024 City of Iowa City Neighborhood and Development Services 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Re: Scarlett Point Subdivision On behalf of the applicant, MMS Consultants requests a rezoning of the properties located at 905, 905 ½, 909, 911 N. Governor Street, 900 , 900 ½, 902, 906, 908 and 910 N Dodge Street, from the current mixed zoning of RS12, RM20, RS8, and R3B, to RM20 and RS12. Respectfully submitted, Jon D. Marner MMS Consultants, Inc. 9200-006L1.docx ATTACHMENT 6 Summary Report for Good Neighbor Meeting Summary Report for Good Neighbor Meeting Project Name: ___________________________Project Location: _________________________ Meeting Date and Time: ________________________________________________________ Meeting Location: _____________________________________________________________ Names of Applicant Representatives attending: ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Names of City Staff Representatives attending: _______________________________________ Number of Neighbors Attending: ________ Sign-In Attached? Yes ______ No ______ General Comments received regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary)- _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Concerns expressed regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary) - _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Will there be any changes made to the proposal based on this input? If so, describe: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Staff Representative Comments ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Scarlett Point 905-911 N Governer & 900-910 N. Dodge August 13, 2024 7:00-8:00 P.M. Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center Social Room Jon Marner & Scott Pottorff(MMS Consultants) Kim Sleege(Select Structural) Anne Russett 20 x See attached summary. See attached summary. Efforts to minimize impacts to existing trees to the extent possible while still meeting city requirements for stormwater detention. Consideration of type and appearance of landscaping adjacent to the park. Concerns related to access location and sanitary sewer capacity have been reviewed on a preliminary level by staff and a detailed review will take place as part of a formal Site plan submittal. Mention of legal rulings that apply to the site with regard to standards to be met and units. Good Neighbor Meeting summary notes: Rezoning Amendment and Preliminary Plat for  property located at 905, 905 ½, 909 and 911 N. Governor Street, and 900, 900 ½, 902, 906,  908 and 910 N. Dodge Street (Scarlett Point)    1. Concern regarding impacts to trees and construction work near Happy Hollow park.  2. Traffic concerns along Governor and Dodge, specifically as follows:  a. Location of entrance.  b. Number of additional cars.  c. Current issues with speeding that is not enforced consistently.  3. General concern and dissatisfaction with the total number of new units and  buildings.  4. Questions regarding the choice of architectural design elements selected for the  buildings.  5. Questions why nothing is being done with the vacant building.  6. Impact to Horace Mann Elementary School.  7. Questions regarding the total number of new residents and the parking required.  8. Questions regarding sanitary sewer capacity.    A follow up meeting with three representatives of the neighborhood was held at MMS at  their request with the same MMS and City staff present as the Good Neighbor Meeting  held at the Robert A. Lee Recreation Center.  The neighborhood representatives are  included with the accompanying sign‐in sheets.    1. Requested to zone to RM‐12 or approximately 54 units.  2. Additional mention of sanitary sewer capacity.  3. Pedestrian safety concerns specifically related to no sidewalk along the west side of  N. Governor, and people cutting through properties.  4. Question regarding use of park by the new tenants, and whether there could be a  sidewalk directly to the park for the proposed site.  5. Mention of a dedication of additional ground to the City for Happy Hollow Park.    ATTACHMENT 7 Correspondence MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 4, 2024 – 6:00 PM – FORMAL MEETING EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Craig, Maggie Elliott, Mike Hensch, Steve Miller, Scott Quellhorst, Billie Townsend, Chad Wade MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Eric Bigley, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Gina Landau, Brian Vogel RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: By a vote of 7-0 the Commission recommends approval of REZ24-0010, a proposal to rezone approximately 27.68 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Road from Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone to Low Density Multi-Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone subject to the following condition: 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CASE NO. REZ24-0010 Location: East of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and West of Camp Cardinal Road An application for a rezoning of approximately 27.68 acres of land from Low Density Multi Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) to Low Density Multi Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12). Russett began the staff report showing an aerial of the subject property, it's located east of Camp Cardinal Boulevard and west of Camp Cardinal Road. The property is currently zoned RM-12 with a Planned Development Overlay, the land to the west is also zoned RM-12, with a Planned Development Overlay and that site is currently vacant. To the south, it's zoned Community Commercial, to the southeast there's more RM-12 zoning and two existing apartment buildings. To the east is the land that the Commission discussed at the last meeting, the proposed Western Homes development that was zoned RS-8 with a Planned Development Overlay. In terms of background, this property was originally rezoned to OPD RM-12 in August 2022, after that rezoning approval went through the applicants moved forward with the subdivision process and their final plats for Cardinal Heights, Part One and Part Two were approved in February 2023. Russett shared the proposed OPD plan and explained this request does not change the proposed land uses or building types that were originally approved with the rezoning from August Planning and Zoning Commission December 4, 2024 Page 2 of 7 2022 nor does it change anything regarding the Sensitive Areas Development Plan or the conservation easements that were approved as part of the subdivision process. The purpose of this rezoning is to request two waivers from zoning standards, and these requests can only be approved through a Planned Development Overlay process. The first request is a 5’ reduction in the minimum front yard setback from 20’ to 15’ and the second request is a 7’ increase in the maximum building height from 35’ to 42’. Russett also pointed out the requests are only for the one multifamily building. Russett shared a few photographs of the site. She noted again the current rezoning is OPD/RM- 12 and the proposed rezoning is OPD/RM-12 and the request is to allow some flexibility in zoning standards. The total number of lots, which is 23, is not changing. There will be 22 duplexes, four townhome style units and one 30-unit multifamily building. Deer Creek Road will be extended through the site, there will be one cul-de-sac to the north and a loop street to the south where all of the duplexes would be. For rezonings there are specific approval criteria along with the general approval criteria. The first standard is related to the design density and whether or not it's compatible with adjacent developments. The proposed land uses do fit with the existing developments and the proposed development to the east, the development and intensity transitions from lower scale on the west side with the duplexes and increases to the east, which aligns well with the proposed multifamily that Western Homes is proposing on their site. Russett noted an error in the staff report as it stated that the garages for the duplexes will need to be recessed from the front facade of the building but since this is a RM-12 zone the duplexes do not need to meet that standard as that is for certain single-family zones. In terms of open space, there is a lot of open space on the site due to the sensitive areas. In terms of traffic circulation, the property would be accessed off of Camp Cardinal Road and there is a proposed traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. Staff is recommending that the Commission maintain that previously approved condition that requires the owner to contribute 50% of the cost of the construction of Camp Cardinal Road as well as the traffic circle. The second criteria is that the development will not overburdening existing utilities and Russett explained this is an infill site and the subject property has access to sanitary sewer and water, and the developer is already installing infrastructure on the property. The third criteria is that development will not adversely affect views, light, air, property values and privacy, as mentioned previously, there are existing conservation easements on the property that will be maintained with almost 17 acres of land that will not be developed and will be preserved. Also, there's not a lot of development around the subject property, there's some duplexes to the north, there's the existing apartments to the southeast, and there's Saint Andrew Church to the east so this development will not impact neighboring residents more than a conventional development would. The fourth criteria is that land use building types and the proposed variations from zoning requirements will be in the public interest. Russett reiterated regarding the waivers, they are just for one building and the applicant has requested a reduction in the front setback from 20’ to 15’ due to site terrain, sensitive features and the existing conservation easements in the area. Additionally, the fire department requested that the applicant move the building closer to the street to address fire code concerns. The alternative of moving the building was to provide a fire truck turn around behind the building, which was not practical given the conservation easement Planning and Zoning Commission December 4, 2024 Page 3 of 7 and the site constraints but moving the building forward requires approval of the setback reduction. Staff finds this request to be acceptable as many other residential uses have a 15’ setback and the requested variation will still accommodate light, air, privacy, as well as onsite open space. The second request is to increase the building height of this building to 42’ and the applicant has requested this modification due to site topography. Staff measures building height based on the average grade to the top of the roof line so due to the sloping nature of the site, the building exceeds that 35’ height maximum, however from the front of the building, it will appear to be 35’ and at the rear of the building it will appear taller than 35’ because of the sloping grade on the site. The rear portion of the building that will look taller is adjacent to an outlot, which is wooded, and so visually will have no impact of passerby’s on the street so staff finds this request to be reasonable as well. Additionally, the proposed increase in height will still accommodate sufficient light and air and open space, and the building will still appear to be 35’ from the front. Russett shared some elevations that were provided by the applicant of the multifamily building. In terms of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Map envisions this to be between eight and 16 dwelling units per acre and the proposed development is under that at three, but the site is constrained significantly by the sensitive features. The applicants are incorporating a diversity of housing types and preserving woodlands, wetlands and slopes on the site. Regarding the environmentally sensitive areas the conservation easements have been put in place to protect the sensitive areas and that will not be changing. In terms of next steps, after a recommendation from the Commission, City Council will set a public hearing, likely at their next meeting on December 10, and the public hearing would then be on January 7. Staff recommends approval of REZ24-0010, a proposal to rezone approximately 27.68 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Road from Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone to Low Density Multi-Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone subject to the following condition: 2. Prior to issuance of building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. Hensch noted one of the criteria is that the development, or the change, doesn't impact views and that always seems so subjective, the view for one person could be fine and to another person it is horrible and for no reason other than personal opinion. Are there any objective criteria regarding that or is it subjectively interpreted. Russett confirmed it is subjective and for this property, in terms of views, the only real neighbors are to the north and they're still going to have a creek and a woodland in their backyard and that won't change with this development. Quellhorst noted in the report the applicant held a Good Neighbor meeting, what was the result or feedback that was obtained as a result of that meeting. Russett explained they held the Good Neighbor meeting for the original rezoning in 2022 and there was a significant amount of feedback from that Good Neighbor meeting and the public hearing process for that, but with this rezoning, staff hasn’t heard anything from neighbors, and they were notified of the meeting tonight. Planning and Zoning Commission December 4, 2024 Page 4 of 7 Craig asked about the traffic circle and does it go between the two developments. Russett explained the traffic circle does go into the Western Homes development and they are also required to contribute 50% of the cost of that construction of that traffic circle. Hensch opened the public hearing. Gina Landau (Navigate Homes) stated nothing's really changed from the very beginning as far as the intention of the development it was just as they started designing parking lots and parking underground areas, they ran into a couple glitches and realized they would need the waivers. Hensch asked if moving the setback in the front was primarily because of the fire department's request. Landau confirmed they met with the fire department, and it was their requirement for safety. And then regarding the additional height, that’s primarily related to the topography on the site because the intention is to have parking underground, and the back part of the building will appear as a four story and the front is only a three story. There will be a little bit of outdoor parking just to hit the requirements, but the majority of the parking will be underground. Craig asked who's the target audience here as it seems like a nice development for families but where are the kids going to play. Landau stated she is not the sales and the marketing person but these will be condos, not an apartment building and typically, most condos are first time home buyers who eventually will maybe move into a duplex, which is what the rest of that development is. Residents may possibly have children, yes, but maybe just starting their families, and while there's no structured play area there's lots of open space with the conservation areas around it. Landau noted all of the open space with the outlots will be maintained by an HOA and they’ve been working with the attorneys to get those set up to make it equitable for everyone. Hensch asked how many acres of open space are in the Conservation Reserve. Russett noted it's almost 17 acres. Craig noted HOAs don’t always take care of their open spaces well, so if there's a way to make HOAs more responsive to the maintenance of their responsibilities that would be appreciated. Townsend asked if there are affordable units in this development. Landau stated there's nothing designated as true affordable housing according to City requirements, but these are not luxury units, they are all one- and two-bedroom units in the 30-plex and they are trying to keep the price point down where someone can actually afford to buy it as a first time homeowner. Townsend asked given the extra height waiver is there any reason why they couldn't have asked for some affordable units in these buildings. Russett noted this area doesn't require income restricted units and the Commission would have add a condition to the rezoning and demonstrate that this rezoning creates a public need for those income restricted units. Russett also noted regarding the height waiver, it's really a topography issue. The height is calculated from the average grade and from the front it is going to be 35’ but the code measures height from the middle which is a much lower grade on this site. Planning and Zoning Commission December 4, 2024 Page 5 of 7 Hensch noted in this area there's a history of neighbors complaining about view interference with their view and so he just wants to make sure they address that. Brian Vogel (Engineer, Hall & Hall) explained he doesn’t know the distance from other buildings and the views, but as far as the height the front of the building is going to be 30’ not even 35’ but then as the grade slopes away to get to the back it will be the 40’ height. There is about a 12’ change in grade due to the slope from front to back. Hensch closed the public hearing. Elliott moves to recommend approval of REZ24-0010, a proposal to rezone approximately 27.68 acres of land located east of Camp Cardinal Blvd and west of Camp Cardinal Road from Low Density Multifamily Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM- 12) zone to Low Density Multi-Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) zone subject to the following condition: 3. Prior to issuance of building permit, Owner shall contribute 50% of the cost of upgrading Camp Cardinal Road to City standards. This contribution shall include 50% of the cost of construction of the traffic circle at the intersection of Deer Creek Road and Camp Cardinal Road. Wade seconded the motion. Elliott stated it seems like a simple request, the fire department requests the setback, and the height seems to be reasonable based on staff recommendation. Wade noted it's a safety request based on the fire department and the law of averages for the topography. Hensch stated he thinks this is a pretty reasonable request and any chance to increase the number of housing units that are more accessible by Iowa City standards they certainly should do that so he supports this application. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REPRESENTATION ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE STEERING COMMITTEE: Russett reminded the Commission that the City is getting started on the Comprehensive Plan update and have executed a consultant agreement with Confluence, out of Des Moines. The City is in the process of formulating a steering committee for this update and are requesting two volunteers from the Planning and Zoning Commission. The role of the steering committee is to serve as an advisor to City staff and the consultant team as they're preparing the Plan, to provide input and feedback, to review the drafts, to help establish final recommendations, which will eventually come to this Commission, and to be an ambassador for the Plan, to promote awareness throughout the community, to encourage participation and to advocate for the Plan. In terms of level of commitment she explained it would be about a one-and-a-half-year process, and there's probably going to be about seven meetings that will last 90 minutes. These meetings will likely start in January. Planning and Zoning Commission December 4, 2024 Page 6 of 7 Quellhorst asked if there are additional members of the community beyond the two people from the P&Z Commission on the committee. Russett explained there will be about 20-26 people from a variety of different stakeholder groups throughout the community. Hensch stated he has been on this Commission for 10 years and is pretty invested in all this and thinks one of the key things is making sure the community understands the Comprehensive Plan. He really appreciates the steering committee being a community ambassador for the Comprehensive Plan, promoting awareness and encouraging participation and advocating for the Plan. He would be interested in volunteering for this, he does come off the Commission in June this year. Waded stated he has an interested, as well. Miller stated while he is new to the Commission he too would be interested in serving on this committee. Craig agreed Hensch should be on this committee, his body of knowledge is so impressive, he's been doing this for 10 years and he knows every hole in every plan. It would be a shame to waste that knowledge and everyone would benefit from him being on the committee. Russett noted there could be three members from the Commission appointed to this committee, they are looking for a diversity of individuals for this committee as well. Craig moved that the representatives on the Comprehensive Plan review steering committee are Wade, Miller and Hensch. Quellhorst seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: NOVEMBER 20, 2024: Craig moved to approve the meeting minutes from November 20, 2024. Elliott seconded the motion, a vote was taken and the motion passed 5-0-2 (Quellhorst and Townsend abstaining). PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Craig asked about the timeline for the project discussed at the last meeting at the ACT area. Russett stated her understanding is that they wanted to get the rezoning approved so they can start rehabbing those existing buildings. Craig stated it seemed like they were eager to get going and noted often times they approve something and six months, a year, six years later it’s still not done. Hensch asked if after two years they have to reapply for a rezoning. Russett clarified that the timeline only applied to OPD rezonings and typically most developments meet that timeline by getting a final plat approved. ADJOURNMENT: Townsend moved to adjourn, Quellhorst seconded and the motion passed 7-0. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2023-2024 8/16 10/4 10/18 11/15 12/6 12/20 1/17 2/7 2/21 4/3 5/1 6/26 9/4 9/18 11/20 12/4 CRAIG, SUSAN X X X X X O/E X X X X X X X X X X ELLIOTT, MAGGIE X X X X X X X O/E X X X O/E X X O/E X HENSCH, MIKE X X X X X X X X X X X X O/E X X X MILLER, STEVE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- X X X X PADRON, MARIA X X X X O/E X X X X O/E O/E -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- QUELLHORST, SCOTT X X X X X X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X TOWNSEND, BILLIE X X X X X X X X X X X X X X O/E X WADE, CHAD X X X X X X X X X X O/E X X X X X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member