Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-07-08 ResolutionItem Number: 5.d. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution approving applications for retail tobacco, tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, and device retailer permits, as required by Iowa Code 453A.47A and Iowa Code 453E.3. Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: Pursuant to Iowa Code §453A.47A, a retail permit is required to sell tobacco, tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products at any place of business or through delivery sales. All permits provided for in Iowa Code §453A.47A expire on June 30 of each year and require payment of the applicable fee established in Iowa Code §453A.47A(7). The Iowa Department of Revenue implements the retail permit requirements of Iowa Code §453A.47A. The City Clerk's Office issues all permits for retailers located within city limits. As part of the retail permit process, the Iowa Department of Revenue requires applications be approved by the City Council once the City receives the completed application and the appropriate fee is paid. Background / Analysis: During the 2024 legislative session, the Iowa legislature enacted Iowa Code §453E.3, which regulates and taxes the sale of devices effective January 1, 2025. Per the legislation, a "device" is defined as any equipment or product, made in whole or in part of glass or metal, that is designed for use in inhaling through combustion tobacco, hemp, other plant materials, or a controlled substance. A device retailer shall only display and sell devices in a location of a retail outlet where the device retailer ensures that the devices are not visible to a person younger than twenty-one years of age and where no person younger than twenty-one years of age is present or permitted to enter at any time. Based on this legislation, we have included 'device' in the permit approval resolution and will indicate the permit type for which each business has applied. Prepared by: Wendy Mayer, License Specialist, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5042 Resolution Number: 25-156 Resolution approving applications for retail tobacco, tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, and device retailer permits, as required by Iowa Code 453A.47A and Iowa Code 453E.3. Whereas, applications for Tobacco/Tobacco Products/Alternative Nicotine Products/ Vapor Products/Device Retail permits have been submitted and filed with the City Clerk; and Whereas, the applicants have filed the proper application and fees as required by the Iowa Department of Revenue; and Whereas, applications are presented to City Council for approval. Now, Therefore, be it Resolved by The City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, That: Section 1. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to issue a permit to the following named applicants and locations to sell the following products: Effective from: July 9, 2025 to June 30, 2026. Business Name Business Address Permit T The Crown Liquor &Smoke 1910 Lower Muscatine Rd Tobacco Permit The Crown Liquor 6, Smoke 1910 Lower Muscatine Rd Device Permit Passed and approved this 8th day of July 2025 Approved b Attest: City Clerk City Attorney' ffice (Jennifer Schwickerath - 07/0312025) Resolution No. Page No. 2 It was moved by Moe and seconded by salih , that the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Alter Bergus x Harmsen x Moe x Salih x Teague x Weilein Item Number: 5.e. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution approving applications for retail tobacco, tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, and device retailer permits, as required by Iowa Code 453A.47A and Iowa Code 453E.3. Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: Pursuant to Iowa Code §453A.47A, a retail permit is required to sell tobacco, tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products at any place of business or through delivery sales. All permits provided for in Iowa Code §453A.47A expire on June 30 of each year and require payment of the applicable fee established in Iowa Code §453A.47A(7). The Iowa Department of Revenue implements the retail permit requirements of Iowa Code §453A.47A. The City Clerk's Office issues all permits for retailers located within city limits. As part of the retail permit process, the Iowa Department of Revenue requires applications be approved by the City Council once the City receives the completed application and the appropriate fee is paid. Background / Analysis: Pursuant to Iowa Code §453A.47A, a retail permit is required to sell tobacco, tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products at any place of business or through delivery sales. All permits provided for in Iowa Code §453A.47A expire on June 30 of each year and require payment of the applicable fee established in Iowa Code §453A.47A(7). The Iowa Department of Revenue implements the retail permit requirements of Iowa Code §453A.47A. The City Clerk's Office issues all permits for retailers located within city limits. As part of the retail permit process, the Iowa Department of Revenue requires applications be approved by the City Council once the City receives the completed application and the appropriate fee is paid. Prepared by: Wendy Mayer, License Specialist, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5042 Resolution Number: 25-157 Resolution approving applications for retail tobacco, tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, and device retailer permits, as required by Iowa Code 453A.47A and Iowa Code 453E.3. Whereas, applications for Tobacco/Tobacco Products/Alternative Nicotine Products/ Vapor Products/Device Retail permits have been submitted and filed with the City Clerk; and Whereas, the applicants have filed the proper application and fees as required by the Iowa Department of Revenue; and Whereas, applications are presented to City Council for approval. Now, Therefore, be it Resolved by The City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, That: Section 1. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to issue a permit to the following named applicants and locations to sell the following products: Effective from: July 9, 2025 to June 30, 2026. Business Name Business Address Permit T Device Permit The Crown Liquor & Smoke 19 Highway 1 W El Paso Tienda Y I aquaria Inc. Gopuff 609 Hollywood Blvd. site 2 1907 Stevens Dr. Tobacco Permit Tobacco Permit Passed and approved this grh day of _ Ulny,lr Approv by City Attorr y's office (Jennifer Schwickerath - 07/03/2025) Attest: City Clerk 2075 Resolution No. 25-157 Page No. 2 It was moved by Moe and seconded by Salih that the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Alter x Bergus x Harmsen Moe Salih x x Teague x Weilein Item Number: 6.b. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the Mercer Pool Roof Replacement Project. Prepared By: Ben Clark - Senior Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel - City Engineer Juli Seydell Johnson - Parks and Recreation Director Ron Knoche - Public Works Director Geoff Fruin - City Manager Fiscal Impact: $495,600.00 available in the Mercer Pool Roof account #R4426. Staff Recommendation: Approval Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item awards the Mercer Pool Roof Replacement Project. Five (5) bids were submitted prior to the July 1, 2025 deadline: Bidder Name City Bid Amount T&K Roofing Company Ely, Iowa $495,600.00 Jim Geise Commercial Roofing, Inc. Eldridge, Iowa $498,980.00 Cedar Service, Company Cedar Rapids, Iowa $538,501.00 Dryspace, Inc Cedar Rapids, Iowa $645,230.00 Rushton Sheet Metal, Inc. Iowa City, Iowa Non -Responsive Engineer's Estimate 1$655,000.00 T&K Roofing Company of Ely, Iowa submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $495,600.00. Staff recommends awarding the contract for the Mercer Pool Roof Replacement Project to T&K Roofing Company. Background / Analysis: The Mercer Park Aquatic Center roof has reached the end of its serviceable life and is need of replacement. Project Timeline: Award Date: July 8, 2025 Specified Start Date: August 4, 2025 Pool Refilling Milestone: September 5, 2025 Substantial Completion: September 12, 2025 �.b Prepare] by: Ben Clark, Engineenng Division, 410 E. WashingWn St. Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)M6G5436 Resolution No. 25-158 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the Mercer Pool Roof Replacement Project Whereas, T&K Roofing Company of Ely, Iowa submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $495,600.00 for construction of the above -named project; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Mercer Pool Roof account #R4426. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: The contract for the construction of the above -named project is hereby awarded to T&K Roofing Company, subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest the contract for construction of the above -named project, subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. 3. The City Engineer and City Manager are authorized to execute change orders according to the City's Purchasing Policy as they may become necessary in the construction of the above -named project. Passed and approved this 8th day of July µ.�a�, 220, ,2,5� — Mayor Approved by Attest: City Clerk City Attome s Office (Liz Craig - 07/02/2025) It was moved by Moe and seconded by salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Alter x Bergus x Harmsen x Moe x Salih x Teague — 7� Weilein Item Number: 6.c. CITY OF IOWA CITY �l COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the FY26 Stormwater Improvements Project. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Attachments: Resolution Tim Schmadeke - Civil Engineer Jason Havel - City Engineer Ron Knoche - Public Works Director Geoff Fruin - City Manager $335,135.50 available in the Annual Storm Sewer Improvement account #M3631. Approval Executive Summary: This agenda item awards the FY26 Stormwater Improvements Project. Four bids were submitted prior to the July 2, 2025 deadline: Bidder Name City Bid Amount Sulzco, LLC Muscatine, Iowa $335,135.50 J & L Construction, LLC Washington, Iowa $340,961.22 Eastern Iowa Excavating & Concrete, LLC Cascade, Iowa $366,875.50 Iron X, LLC Riverside, Iowa $382,520.35 Engineer's Estimate $350,000.00 Sulzco, LLC of Muscatine, Iowa submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $335,135.50. Staff recommends awarding the contract for the FY26 Stormwater Improvements Project to Sulzco, LLC. Background / Analysis: This project includes storm sewer repairs on Greenwood Drive, Wylde Green Road, and Clover Street. The work generally includes replacing damaged storm sewer pipe, intakes, pavement replacement, and site restoration. Additional repair locations may be added to the project as they arise. Project Timeline: Construction Start — July 2025 Final Completion — June 2026 i ,c Prepared by, Tim Schmadeke, Engineering Oivis n, 410 E. Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 (319)95rr5044 Resolution No. 25-159 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the FY26 Stormwater Improvements Project Whereas, Sulzco, LLC of Muscatine, Iowa has submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $335,135.50 for construction of the above -named project; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Annual Storm Sewer Improvements, account #M3631. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The contract for the construction of the above -named project is hereby awarded to Sulzco, LLC, subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest the contract for construction of the above -named project, subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. 3. The City Engineer and City Manager are authorized to execute change orders according to the City's Purchasing Policy as they may become necessary in the construction of the above -named project. Passed and approved this 8th day of July 2025 T _ P-D�C�'t-9--� Mayor Approved by Attest: -- G� City Clerk City Attom ys Office (Liz Craig - 07/03/2025) It was moved by Moe and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Alter x x Bergus x Harmsen x Moe x Satin x Teague __T_ Weilein Item Number: 6.d. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the 2025 Water Pavement Patching Project. Prepared By: Tim Schmadeke — Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel - City Engineer Ron Knoche - Public Works Director Geoff Fruin - City Manager Fiscal Impact: $303,709.80 available in the Water Divisions Operating Budget account #73730130 Staff Recommendation: Approval Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item awards the 2025 Water Pavement Patching Project. Two (2) bids were submitted prior to the July 1, 2025 deadline: Bidder Name City Bid Amount Eastern Iowa Excavating & Concrete, LLC Cascade, Iowa $303,709.80 All American Concrete West Liberty, Iowa $383,589.00 Engineer's Estimate $360,000.00 Eastern Iowa Excavating & Concrete, LLC of Cascade, Iowa submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $303,709.80. Staff recommends awarding the contract for the 2025 Water Pavement Patching Project to Eastern Iowa Excavating & Concrete, LLC. Background / Analysis: On average, there are approximately 70 water main breaks in Iowa City each year. Street and sidewalk pavement typically need to be replaced following water main repairs. With limited resources and the emergency nature of the pavement repairs, the City combines the pavement repairs at multiple main break sites into a single project to more efficiently address pavement damage resulting from water main breaks. As additional main breaks occur later this year, those sites will also be added to this project for repair. Project Timeline: Construction Start — July 2025 Final Completion — November 2025 fl.J Prepared by: Tim Schmadeke. Engineering Division, 410 E. Wasbingloo St., love City. IA 52240 (31g)356-5044 Resolution No. 25-160 Resolution awarding contract and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest a contract for construction of the 2025 Water Pavement Patching Project Whereas, Eastern Iowa Excavating & Concrete, LLC of Cascade, Iowa has submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid of $303,709.80 for construction of the above -named project; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Water Divisions Operating Budget, account #73730130. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The contract for the construction of the above -named project is hereby awarded to Eastern Iowa ect o the condition at e adequate performanceta d payment tbond,iinsurance certificates, andhcont actdee compl ante Program statements. 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign and the City Clerk to attest the contract for construction of the above -named project, subject to the condition that awardee secure adequate performance and payment bond, insurance certificates, and contract compliance program statements. 3. The City Engineer and City Manager are authorized to execute change orders according to the Citys Purchasing Policy as they may become necessary in the construction of the above -named project. Passed and approved this Bch day of July 2025 ayor Approved by Attest: i t--e r �`�'� City Clerk City Attome s Office (Liz Craig — 07/02/2025) It was moved by Moe and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Alter X Bergus x x Harmsen X Moe x Salih Teague �— Weilein x -- Item Number: 6.e. CITY OF 1 O WA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution accepting the work for the 2024 Landfill Camera Movement Project. Prepared By: Joe Welter - Senior Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel - City Engineer Ron Knoche - Public Works Director Geoff Fruin - City Manager Fiscal Impact: None. Staff Recommendation: Approval Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: Work on the project was recently completed by Advanced Electrical Services, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer's Report and Performance, Payment and Maintenance Bond are on file with the City Engineer. Project Estimated Cost $35,000.00 Project Bid Received $31,800.00 Project Actual Cost $34,600.00 Background / Analysis: This project included new conduit, a handhole, a pole, a cabinet, and fiber to move existing cameras approximately 700 feet west of their current location. This movement allows better coverage of the current and active landfill cell. This will aid staff in observing operations and provide alerts of potential fires. ENGINEER'S REPORT July 1, 2025 I r i WIM®0001 CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 319-356-5000 1 www.icgov.org City Council Iowa City, Iowa Re: 2024 Landfill Camera Movement Project Dear City Clerk: I hereby certify that the 2024 Landfill Camera Movement Project has been completed by Advanced Electrical Services, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the Engineering Division. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $34,600.00. There was one (1) change order on the project as described below: Removal of old camera, replacement pan -tilt camera $2,800.00. I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, Jason Havel, P.E. City Engineer Prepared by: Joe Welter, Engineering Division, Public Works, 410 East Washington Street, Icwa City, Iowa 52240 (319) 356-51" Resolution No. 25-. 161 Resolution accepting the work for the 2024 Landfill Camera Movement Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the 2024 Landfill Camera Movement Project, as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and Advanced Electrical Services, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa, dated November 12, 2024, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineer's Report and the performance, payment and maintenance bond have been filed in the City Engineer's office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the account # 75750121; and Whereas, the final contract price is $34,600.00. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this Bch day of �July 12025 Mayor Attest: � ��`C'� City Clerk It was moved by Moe and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Approved by City Attom ys office (Liz Craig — 07/0212025) salih the Resolution be Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Alter x Bergus x Hannsen Y Moe x Salih x Teague x Weilein Item Number: 6.f. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution accepting the work for the Sturgis Ferry Park Improvements and Southside Recycling Center Project. Prepared By: Scott Sovers - Assistant City Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel - City Engineer Ron Knoche - Public Works Director Geoff Fruin - City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Staff Recommendation: Approval Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: Work on the project was recently completed by Streb Construction Company, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications. The Engineer's Report and Performance, Payment and Maintenance Bond are on file with the City Clerk. Project Estimated Cost $790,000.00 Project Bid Received $774,409.10 Project Actual Cost $875,200.90 There were ten (10) change orders on this project, which generally included removal and proper disposal of unsuitable soils, the installation of electrical conduits as needed to provide electricity to the new park lighting as well as the replacement of failing storm sewer in the area. Background / Analysis: The project improved the quality and safety of the current boat ramp and the riverbank edge for fishing. Additionally, the project included park amenities such as a shelter, a drinking fountain, a park sign and lighting; and added recycling facilities as needed to fill a gap in coverage on the south side of Iowa City following the loss of the Benton Street and North Dodge Street sites. e r 1 � y�oai�1 CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE 410 East Washington Street ENGINEER'S REPORT Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 319-356-5000 1 www.icgov.org June 26, 2025 City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa Re: Sturgis Ferry Park Improvements and Southside Recycling Center Project Dear City Clerk: I hereby certify that the construction of the Sturgis Ferry Park Improvements and Southside Recycling Center Project has been completed by Streb Construction Company, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by Shive-Hattery, Inc. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $ 875,200.90. There were ten (10) change or extra work orders for the project as described below: . Change Order Description 1. Removal of unsuitable soils 2. Removal of additional unsuitable soils 3. Manhole adjustment 4. Conduit for electrical service 5. Shelter footing adjustment 6. Maintenance entrance, portable restroom pad, seeding 7. Erosion control, pavement cold weather protection 8. Additional traffic control 9. Storm sewer replacement 10. Additional traffic control TOTAL Net Contract Change $2, 397.00 $18,788.44 $4,400.50 $21,288.18 $1,500.00 $6, 090.20 $3,384.28 $4, 763.00 $43,276.50 2 750.00 $108,638.10 I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sinc I , d� aon Havel, P.E. City Engineer Prepared by: Scott Savers, Engineering Division, Public Worts, 410 E. Washington St., laws City. IA 52240 (319) 356-5142 Resolution No. 25-162 Resolution accepting the work for the Sturgis Ferry Park Improvements and Southside Recycling Center Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the Sturgis Ferry Park Improvements and Southside Recycling Center Project, as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and Streb Construction Company, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa, dated October 10th, 2023, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineers Report and the Performance, Payment and Maintenance Bond have been filed in the City Clerk's Office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Southside Recycling & Sturgis Ferry Boat account # L3334; and Whereas, the final contract price is $875,200.90. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this 8th day of July 2025 Mayor Attest: v City Clerk It was moved by MOe and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Approved by City Attorna s Office (Liz Craig - 07/0212025) Salih the Resolution be Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Alter x Bergus x Harmsen x Moe x Salih x Teague —x— Weilein Item Number: 6.g. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution approving a 28E agreement to jointly apply for a Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) grant for reconstruction of the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge over Ralston Creek. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Attachments: Resolution Agreement Letter Jason Havel — City Engineer Ron Knoche — Public Works Director Geoff Fruin — City Manager Approximately $10,000, available in the Annual Bridge Maintenance and Repair account #S3910. Approval Executive Summary: The Iowa Department of Transportation is applying for a CHBP grant on behalf of itself and 22 other Local Public Agencies in Iowa, including 19 counties and 3 cities. The City of Iowa City was selected as one of those cities, with the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge over Ralston Creek included as a part of the project. This item approves a 28E agreement between the City, Iowa Department of Transportation and other cities and counties to allow for the entities to share in the cost of completing the grant application and assign responsibilities for administering the grant. The estimated cost to the City to apply for the grant is $10,000. The project would include the replacement of the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge over Ralston Creek and construction costs are estimated at $3,700,000. The grant application is anticipated to request funding for approximately 80% of the estimated construction cost. As a part of the application, a letter of support from the City has also been requested. Background / Analysis: Recently, the U.S. Department of Transportation made funding available through the CHBP. The CHBP is a grant program that provides funding for bridge replacement or rehabilitation projects in eligible states, such as Iowa. Applications for CHBP can only be submitted by an eligible state Department of Transportation and selected projects must demonstrate anticipated cost savings by bundling projects at multiple locations. As a part of the City's regular bridge inspection program, the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge over Ralston Creek was identified as being in poor condition. Based on this condition, the Iowa Department of Transportation identified this bridge as a candidate for the grant program. Iowa Secretary of State 1E OF /aFILED 321 East 12th Street Filing Date: 07/24/2025 03:05 PM Des Moines, IA 50319 ►. 10%�'.� SEAL y�� Filing Number: M518306 sos.iowa.gov 4RY 4F 28E Agreement Full Legal Name Party "I Iowa Department of Transportation Party 2 City of Iowa City Party 3 City of Davenport Party 4 City of Mount Pleasant Party 5 Blackhawk County Party) Buchanan County Party - Emmet County Party 8 Floyd County Par+! 91 Guthrie County Pai,y 10 Hancock County Party 11 Henry County Party 1= Howard County Party 1'3 Keokuk County Party 14 Kossuth County Par} 15 Marion County Part' ! 3 Page County Pasty 17 Pocahontas County Pasty 18 Pottawattamie County Party 19 Poweshiek County Party ?u Sioux County Party 21 Webster County Party %% Woodbury County Party 23 Worth County Participants 300 - HIGHWAY AND PUBLIC WORKS Sei',iic' Type Organization Type County State Agency Other City Johnson City Scott City Henry County Black Hawk County Buchanan County Emmet County Floyd County Guthrie County Hancock County Henry County Howard County Keokuk County Kossuth County Marion County Page County Pocahontas County Pottawattamie County Poweshiek County Sioux County Webster County Woodbury County Worth 2025 Iowa DOT Competitive Highway Bridge Program Grant Application Agreement Purpose Indefinite Duratian Contact Person: (Optional) Lindsey Ccntact Firs. i`lai7ie Schroeder Contact _.sr ^;ama Discretionary Grant Coordinator -ob T;rI= 319-230-8444 NIU ibe Prepared by: Jason Havel, Engineering Division, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319) 356-5410 Resolution No. 25-163 Resolution approving a 28E agreement to jointly apply for a Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) grant for reconstruction of the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge over Ralston Creek Whereas, federal funding is available through the CHBP, the purpose of which is to provide funding towards highway bridge replacement or rehabilitation projects on public roads that demonstrate cost savings by bundling at multiple highway bridge projects; and Whereas, funding is available only to eligible states, which includes Iowa; and Whereas, the Iowa Department of Transportation is applying for a CHBP grant on behalf of itself and 22 other Local Public Agencies in Iowa, including 19 counties and 3 cities; and Whereas, the City's Kirkwood Avenue Bridge over Ralston Creek was selected as one of the bridges to be included in the application; and Whereas, the proposed project would include the reconstruction of the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge over Ralston Creek; and Whereas, a 28E agreement between the City, Iowa Department of Transportation and other cities and counties will allow for the entities to share in the cost of completing the grant application and assign responsibilities for administering the grant, if awarded; and Whereas, the City Council finds said proposal to be in the public interest. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign, and the City Clerk to attest, the attached 28E agreement. 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the attached letter of support. 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any amendments to the 28E agreement as may become necessary. 4. The City hereby authorizes staff to submit the required documentation to participate in the CHBP grant application. 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to sign the grant agreement, if awarded. 6. The City agrees to fund the design and construction of the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge replacement project beyond the amount awarded as a part of the grant, should CHBP grand funding be awarded. Resolution No. 25_1-6-� Page 2 Passed and approved this 8th day of July 2025 j�- i Mayor Approved by Attest: City Clerk City Attorn is Office (Liz Craig — 07/03/2025) It was moved by Moe adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: and seconded by Nays: salih the Resolution be Absent: Alter Bergus Harmsen Moe Salih Teague Weilein Agreement No. 2025-16-107 Staff Action No. xxx - 2025 xx xx 28E Cooperative Agreement for a Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) Grant Project This Agreement is entered into this Arh day of .{„1y 2025, by and between the Iowa Department of Transportation (herein after referred to as Iowa DOT), and the counties named in Section 4, paragraph A (herein after collectively referred to as the Counties), and the cities named in Section 4, paragraph B (herein after collectively referred to as the Cities), as follows: WHEREAS, the Iowa DOT, the Counties, and the Cities, are public agencies as defined by Section 28E.2 of the Code of Iowa, and WHEREAS, Section 28E.3 of the Code of Iowa provides that any powers, privileges or authority exercised or capable of exercise by a public agency of the State of Iowa may be exercised and enjoyed jointly by a public agency of the State of Iowa having such power or powers, and WHEREAS, In accordance with Iowa Code Chapter 28E and other relevant sections of the Code of Iowa, the Iowa DOT, the Counties, and the Cities enter into this cooperative and joint Agreement to define the roles and responsibilities of the Iowa DOT, the Counties, and the Cities, to provide for the design, construction, administration, and cost sharing for four (4) Iowa DOT -owned bridge projects, twenty-seven (27) county owned bridge projects, and three (3) city owned bridge projects, which will each be bundled into one of several construction contracts (hereinafter Project), detailed in Exhibit B, as part of an anticipated Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) Grant Award, and WHEREAS, The CHBP funding was made available by the Full -Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025, Public Law 119-4, March 15, 2025, which provides $250 million to be awarded by FHWA for a CHBP with the same requirements as The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, Public Law 118-42, Section 126. Federal funds are available to eligible States for replacement or rehabilitation of specific bridge projects that demonstrate cost savings by bundling multiple highway bridge projects, which were included in the grant application, and WHEREAS, the Iowa DOT, the Counties, and the Cities, desire to select potential bridge replacement candidates, to develop an application for CHBP Grant funding, and to contract Grant Application Development Consulting Services with HDR Engineering, Inc., to assemble and submit a grant application for the purpose of acquiring said CHBP Grant funding, and WHEREAS, the Iowa DOT is willing and able to enter into a contract with HDR Engineering, and provide contract management and accounting services as agreed to herein, for and between the parties to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Iowa DOT agrees to be the Lead Applicant and Primary Recipient, and all other Counties and Cities herein agree to be Sub -Recipients, and WHEREAS, the Iowa DOT, the Counties, and the Cities, have informed themselves as to this Agreement. THEREFORE, IT IS NOW AGREED that the Iowa DOT, the Counties, and the Cities will enter into this Agreement Pursuant to Chapter 28E of the Code of Iowa providing for cooperative action pursuant to the proposed Project, and said cooperative actions include the following: SCOPE GRANT APPLICATION WORK The Iowa DOT will be the Contracting Authority for the HDR Engineering Inc. Professional Services contract, as per the attached proposal, Professional Services Agreement and associated Exhibit A. The Iowa DOT shall be responsible for contract administration and accounting services between the Counties, Cities, and the Consultant. 1 2. The Iowa DOT shall make payments to HDR Engineering Inc. for all grant application Professional Services rendered. The total amount paid to HDR Engineering will then be divided evenly across the total number of bridges included in the grant application. The Iowa DOT shall invoice each of the nineteen (19) counties and three (3) cities for their share of the Professional Services rendered. Each of the nineteen (19) counties and three (3) cities shall reimburse the Iowa DOT for their per bridge share times their total number of bridges included in the grant application within 30 days of receipt of invoice. POST -AWARD ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. The Iowa DOT shall serve as the Lead Applicant, primary point of contact, and primary recipient for the CHBP grant award. The primary recipient shall be an eligible applicant that submits the application and is responsible to deliver the CHBP Grant Awarded Project. 2. The Iowa DOT, as Primary Recipient, will administer the CHBP grant funding for the Counties and the Cities, as sub -recipients, and provide Federal -aid oversight in the same manner as it does for other Federal formula funds that are administered through the Iowa DOT to the Counties and the Cities. Primary and sub -recipients shall be responsible for financial accounting for their jurisdictional portion of the Project. One lead agency, the Contracting Authority, will be identified for each of the construction contract bundles, per Exhibit B. The Contracting Authority may be a County Bridge Owner, a City Bridge Owner, or the Iowa DOT, and shall be responsible for contract and project administration including: • Execution of the construction contract • Signature as Contracting Authority on construction phase change orders • Provide all pertinent correspondence, documentation, and relevant project information necessary to fulfill the reporting requirements to the primary recipient (Iowa DOT) • Upon successful completion of the contract, the Contracting Authority's Engineer will be responsible for signing final acceptance documents for the contract. Each County Bridge Owner or City Bridge Owner shall be a sub -recipient to Iowa DOT and is responsible for the project development and administration items listed below, and shall provide all pertinent information, as per the resolutions attached hereto and as such becomes part of this Agreement, to the Iowa DOT for CHBP project coordination and reporting requirements for the bridges identified in Exhibit B. • Project planning, development, construction administration and inspection, and completion of final paperwork for their respective project(s) in accordance with Iowa DOT policy, Iowa DOT Specifications, Iowa DOT Materials Instructional Memorandums (I.M.$), and with Iowa DOT I.M.s for Local Public Agencies, which include processes and design requirements that meet Federal -aid standards and are approved by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) • Coordination with other agencies within the contract bundle for letting and contract close-out • Process contractor's progress and final payments for each Bridge Owner's respective bridge(s) • Construction engineer signature on change orders. In the event the construction engineer is a consultant, the Bridge Owner shall also sign change orders as the Person in Responsible Charge (PIRC). • Pay its proportionate share of the Local Matching Costs as set forth in the FINANCING paragraph of this Agreement. • Perform or complete all other duties and documentation required to administer their project A. The Counties • Black Hawk County • Buchanan County • Emmet County • Floyd County • Guthrie County • Hancock County • Henry County • Howard County • Keokuk County • Kossuth County • Marion County • Page County • Pocahontas County • Pottawattamie County • Poweshiek County • Sioux County • Webster County • Woodbury County • Worth County B. The Cities • City of Davenport • City of Iowa City • City of Mount Pleasant The projects in Exhibit B shall be bundled within construction contracts via the Iowa DOT's Contracts and Specifications Bureau's letting process. The Iowa DOT will let the construction contracts. The Project shall be obligated by September 30, 2028. The Project shall be paid in full by September 30, 2033, or the amount not paid will be de -obligated. After the bid letting, all non -Contracting Authority agencies agree to discuss the bids and take action to either recommend awarding the contract to the lowest, responsive bidder or reject all bids within 30 days of the letting date. The Contracting Authority agrees to discuss the bids and take action to either award the contract to the lowest, responsive bidder, or reject all bids within 30 days of the letting date. The Contracting Authority shall then follow the Iowa DOT process to accept the low bid or reject all bids. FINANCING — Each County Bridge Owner, City Bridge Owner, and the Iowa DOT shall pay for their respective project costs, including overages beyond the initial budget presented in the application. Payment to the Prime Contractor shall be made either directly by each agency, from the Iowa DOT Primary Road Fund (PRF), or from each County Bridge Owner's Farm to Market (FM) account, and the CHBP funds shall be reimbursed to said agency, PRF, or FM account, as per the Iowa DOT payment and reimbursement methodologies. All costs not reimbursed with CHBP funds, County HBP funds, the County Bridge Construction Fund, City HBP Funds, STBG Funds, or Farm to Market funds shall be paid for by each respective County Bridge Owner, City Bridge Owner, or the Iowa DOT. Any cost incurred by a county, city, or Iowa DOT outside of the period of performance of the CHBP grant agreement is non -reimbursable and the responsibility of the county, city, or Iowa DOT. TERMINATION — This Agreement will be terminated upon final acceptance of the work by all County Bridge Owners, City Bridge Owners, and the Iowa DOT and settlement of the financial conditions set forth in the FINANCING paragraph of this Agreement, including final project acceptance and closeout in FMIS, and final acceptance of CHBP Grant award requirements and final reporting. If any of the Counties, the Cities, or the Iowa DOT wish to terminate their responsibilities under this Agreement, an amendment to this Agreement must be executed by all parties specifying the conditions of such termination. SERVABILITY- If any part of this Agreement is found to be void and unenforceable then the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect. NON-DISCRIMINATION- In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and Iowa Code Chapter 216 and associated subsequent nondiscrimination laws, regulations and executive orders, the LPAs shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, creed, age, sex, sexual orientation, national origin, religion, pregnancy, or disability. CHAPTER 28E PROVISIONS - There will be no new or separate legal or administrative entity created by this Agreement. The primary recipient shall be responsible for the filing of this Agreement with the Iowa Secretary of State as required by law following its execution. 3 PROPERTY — No property will be jointly held as part of this Agreement. LIABILITY — Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create joint or several liability of a party hereto for the acts omissions or obligations of the other parties. Each party shall be liable only for its own acts and the parties shall have such rights of indemnity and contribution among themselves with respect to this Agreement and the undertakings hereunder as shall be permitted by law and consistent with the provisions of this Agreement. OBLIGATIONS — The Counties, the Cities, and Iowa DOT's obligations hereunder will cease immediately, without penalty of further payment being required, in any year for which the General Assembly of either state, or the U.S. Congress, fails to make an appropriation or re -appropriation to pay such obligations. The Counties, the Cities, and Iowa DOT will provide the other parties to this Agreement notice of such termination of funding as soon as practical after it becomes aware of the failure of funding. In the event such notice is provided, the other parties to this Agreement may terminate the Agreement or any part thereof. EXECUTION —This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts as the case may be, each of which shall be deemed a duplicate original and which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. In addition, the parties agree that the Agreement may be executed by electronic, digital, pdf, or facsimile signatures by any party and such signature will be deemed binding for all purposes hereof without delivery of an original signature being thereafter required. Execution of this Agreement constitutes approval pursuant to Iowa Code section 28E.10 as to all matters within the Iowa DOT's and the Counties' and Cities' jurisdiction with regard to any services (or facilities) over which each agency has constitutional or statutory powers of control. AMENDMENTS - This Agreement may only be amended in writing, after the amendment has been signed by all parties. An amendment shall become effective immediately upon filing with the Iowa Secretary of State pursuant to Iowa Code section 28E.8. INDEMNIFICATION —As permitted by law, the Counties, the Cities, and Iowa DOT shall Indemnify and hold each other, their employees and agents, wholly harmless from any damages, claims, demands, or suits by any person or persons to the extent caused by the respective acts or omissions by the Counties, the Cities, or the officers, agents, or employees of either, in the course of any work done in connection with any of the matters set forth in this Agreement. [This space intentionally left blank] 4 WITNESS WHEREOF, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth above and for other good and valuabl c sideration, the receipt, adequacy and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties have into a Agreement and have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute the Agreement. This Ag on the County Signature Block nt was approved by official action of the (County Name) County Board of Supervisors iry6fficial session ay of 2025. Count uditor Chair, County Board of Sup 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth above and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties have entered into the Agreement and have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute the Agreement. I gy Bruce Teague Mayor of Iowa City, Iowa City Signature Block Date July 0$ , 2025 I, Kellie Grace, certify that I am the City Clerk of Iowa City, and that Bruce Teague, who signed said Agreement for and on behalf of the city was duly authorized to execute the same by virtue of a formal resolution duly passed and adopted by the city on the 8th day of July Signed Date July 08 . 2025 City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa IN WITNESS WHEREOF, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth above and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt, adequacy and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties have entered into the Agreement and have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute the Agreement. Iowa DOT Signature Block This Agreement was approved by official action of the Iowa DOT on the 21 day of J u i v 12025. uvL'a� Deputy Director, Transportation Development Division 7 Exhibit A Attachment Al-1 Scope of Services Contract 319AN, SA12 2025 Grant Application for Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) INTRODUCTION The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the US DOT released a revised NOFO and second round of funding through the Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP). The program is open only to states with a population density of less than 100 individuals per square mile. Program funding must be used for highway bridge rehabilitation or replacement on public roads that demonstrate cost savings through the bundling of multiple bridge projects into a single contract. The Iowa DOT has requested HDR to provide support to update/revise the previously submitted FY24 CHBP bundled bridge application to align with the new CHBP NOFO requirements. HDR will also provide technical support to Iowa DOTto develop a second single CHBP grant application for bridge bundling for the FY25 funding appropriation. HDR will work with DOT staff, as well as the ICEA Service Bureau, to collect necessary data for use in the benefit -cost analysis and grant application, such as traffic data and project cost estimates. It is HDR's understanding that critical data, such as National Bridge Inventory Data (NBI) and cost assumptions, are already available for the project. HDR will develop a benefit -cost analysis (BCA) model using assumptions consistent with US DOT's guidance for conducting BCAs for discretionary grant programs. In the development of the follow scope of services, it is assumed that much of the common themes and overall narrative framework will be carried forward from the previous 2024 CHBP grant application and applied to the 2025 CHBP grant application. This also applies to methodologies and processes used to perform safety and detour analyses, as well as to develop the benefit -cost analyses. TASK 1.0: Project Management and QC TASK 1.1: Project Management HDR will provide contract administration, coordination, and direction for the duration of this contract. HDR will provide a project manager to serve as the HDR's single point of contact with Iowa DOT for this Scope of Services. Three (3) months are assumed for invoicing and progress reporting. Deliverables: • One (1) electronic copy of monthly invoice and progress report. Task 1.2: Quality Review of Deliverables HDR will perform an independent quality review of deliverables noted below. To facilitate more efficient document management, reviews and collaboration, HDR will establish and host a project Team s/SharePoint site and provide access to Iowa DOT, ICEA and other project representatives. Task 1.3: Kickoff / Coordination Meetings HDR will conduct a kick-off meeting with the Iowa DOT project team to review the scope of work for this project. As part of the project kickoff meeting, HDR will provide Iowa DOT with guidance on US DOT's guidelines for the Competitive Highway Bridge Program and probable application review strategy, application development, schedule, criteria, and overall strategy. HDR will use the project kick-off call as an opportunity to facilitate a strategy session on the grant application approach and detailed work plan. The kick-off call will also be used as an opportunity to obtain relevant existing documentation related to the individual bridge projects. This task will also include virtual meetings with Iowa DOT, ICEA, and representatives of cities and counties with participating bridge projects. Coordination meetings will be used to discuss various options for the development Page A-1 Exhibit A of the application, develop common themes and messages for the proposed bundling of projects, confirm budget inputs, and review draft application documents as the project progresses. It is anticipated that a total of eight (8) 1-hr virtual meetings will be held to discuss interim deliverables and progress during project development. Deliverables: Monthly invoices and progress reports, action items from calls/meetings, and quality control -quality assurance. Task 2: Collect and Review Available Data HDR will provide a revised questionnaire to obtain or confirm bridge specific information from cities / counties, including ADT, percent trucks, current load rating, proposed detour route, and other data, using the forms and tables from the 2024 CHBP grant application effort. It is assumed that the following data would be provided to HDR for use on the study: • Existing traffic volumes, including vehicle classification (e.g., AADT and percent trucks) • Projected traffic volumes (or an annual growth rate) • Estimated detour routes for each bridge • Bridge construction cost estimates ■ Maintenance and rehabilitation costs for different states of repair • Bridge weight limitations and load postings (current and forecasted timing) Proposed or anticipated contracting and delivery method In addition, HDR will create a public -friendly online survey for each county to distribute and conduct engagement, the results of which will be included in the application. Task 3. Scenario Definition and Pro ect Prioritization HDR will work with Iowa DOT, ICEA, and other cities and counties to identify and assess bridge projects to be include in the grant application. Grant Project Identification and Prioritization This coordination effort will utilize the public impacts expected from the individual bridge projects to determine the bridges included in the application. Part of this strategy will involve selecting the various components of the project for inclusion in the scope in order to increase the probability of a grant award. This scope of work assumes that these public impacts will be: • Time and distance impacts associated with bridge detours (due to weight posted or closed bridges) • Expected safety improvements due to bridge improvements (increased bridge width, improved guardrail protection) ■ Lower rehabilitation costs due to a better state of repair Also, as part of this task, HDR will also work with Iowa DOT to help screen and select Iowa DOT bridge projects to include in the application with the county and city bundles. We will use available data to help develop simple screening criteria to select the most beneficial projects in terms of the grant thematic scenarios. Assessment of Bridge Bundling/Packaging Upon completion of Task 3.1 above, HDR will support ICEA and Iowa DOT in the development of bridge bundles, which will represent contract packages for construction. Bridge projects will be grouped together, as able, based on factors such as: • Project Readiness • Geographic Proximity • Structure Type ■ Economies of Scale to Reduce Overall Bridge Construction Costs • Reduction of Construction Detour Duration Page A-2 Exhibit A This exercise will provide a more efficient project delivery scenario, enhancing the overall merits of the grant application. Deliverable: Brief documentation of scenario definition and project prioritization results. Task 4. Traffic Operations and Safety Analysis Safety Analysis Crash data will be obtained for the past 10-year period for up to 35 bridges identified by Iowa DOT and the cities and counties. Crash rates will be calculated for identified bridges to highlight bridges that exceed the statewide average crash rate for similar features and support predictive safety analysis. Highway Safety Manual -based crash prediction methods will be implemented with the NCHRP 17-38 spreadsheet tool provided by AASHTO for up to 35 bridges, resulting in predicted crashes on the existing bridge and predicted crashes on the new bridge. Iowa DOT's published average crash rates by facility class will be collected and forecasted if necessary. Crash prediction results developed (crashes per year) will be estimated for up to 4 key years of analysis by KABCO severity level. These data will serve as inputs for Task 6. Operations Analysis Highway Capacity Manual methods applied via spreadsheet will be utilized to determine a before and after average travel speed for travel through the project limits and via the project detour for up to 35 bridges. The differential between before and after travel times will be applied to the volume of traffic impacted by the project in Task 6. Daily out -of -distance travel delay will also be calculated for bridge detours using the same HCM-based methods. Before and after travel time analysis will focus on typical day conditions or recurring congestion and will be estimated for each year in the benefit -cost analysis. Estimates of delay for non -recurring congestion may be developed at the request of Iowa DOT but will be calculated as a fixed percentage increase to recurring congestion based on statewide breakdowns of source congestion published in Iowa DOT's TSMO Program Plan or provided by Iowa DOT. Deliverable: Documentation of the methodologies for the traffic and safety analyses will be developed for inclusion as an appendix in the grant application package. Task 5- GIS Mapping & Detour Analysis HDR will map the locations of the individual bridge projects proposed for the application, including the selected city and county bridges. This GIS mapping will assist in efforts to appropriately bundle bridge projects into construction packages, helping to inform geographic themes or points of merit. HDR will work with DOT to review existing bridge inventory data for the bridges in the bundles, including detour routes in the event of bridge posting or closure. DOT will help refine these detour routes and distances. HDR may conduct GIS analyses to aid the calculations of distances and consider the proximity and condition of neighboring bridges for passenger vehicle and truck detour routes. The results of these analyses will inform the user costs of detours in the case of bridge closures or weight restrictions estimated in Task 6, Benefit -Cost Analysis. User costs will cover travel time, vehicle operating costs, safety, and emissions impacts associated with bridge detours. Deliverable: Predicted detour costs for the baseline scenario — required for input into benefit -costs. Task 6. Benefit -Cost Anal sis HDR will quantify public benefits and impacts expected from the project that demonstrate adherence with the CHBP selection criteria. A key challenge of this grant application will be to provide compelling evidence to USDOT of the merits of bundling the bridge projects compared to implementing the projects individually, as well as demonstrating that the monetized benefits of the bundled projects outweigh the project costs. The economic analyses will include the following elements: Develop Benefit -Cost Model: This effort will re -use much of the model development performed for the 2024 CHBP grant application, using the same logic diagrams and monetization methods for user costs and Page A-3 Exhibit A associated benefit categories identified in Task 5. The BCA model from the 2024 CHBP grant effort will be updated and populated with the most up-to-date project information available from Tasks 4 and 5, and parameters according to the latest USDOT BCA guidance and other publicly available data. Produce Benefit -Cost Results, Test Sensitivity of Results against Key Variables: Initial benefit -cost results will be developed, and key variables will be flagged for testing. The model will be re -run using ranges on key variables to evaluate the robustness of the BCA. Issue and Document Results: Materials for the CHBP grant application, including the BCA excel -based model, technical documentation, and data points to support the merit criteria narrative will be written, reviewed, and finalized. To support the development of 0&M costs for each structure, HDR work with the Iowa DOT Bridges & Structures Bureau to establish a schedule of standard or parametric cost estimates for operations and maintenance activities by such characteristics as bridge/structure type (i.e. timber, concrete, etc.) and general age of structure. Again, this will utilize information produced in the 2024 CHBP grant effort, and updated with any new information available. This schedule of 0&M costs will be applied to each bridge site based on existing and proposed bridge types to assist in the development of site -specific 0&M costs for the BCA. Deliverables: A short document summarizing key data for the application narrative; technical documentation (appendix or narrative) describing the evaluation approach, data, assumptions, and results of the analysis; and the benefit -cost excel -based model for submission to USDOT. Task 7. CHBP Grant Application Preparation HDR will compile the analysis, develop select graphics, and document strategies that address the grant requirements. HDR will also assist in evaluating the selected projects and developing content for each of the applicable selection criterion described earlier in this proposal. Iowa DOT will be responsible for the actual submittal of the grant application on the grants.gov site. The application narrative will follow USDOT's recommended structure and approach for describing the project, its costs, funding, benefits, and other factors. The CHBP grant application narrative will include the following project narrative, generally following the basic outline below, as per the previous NOFO: I. Cover Page Table (as per template in NOFO) II. Project Description III. Project Location IV. Project Parties V. Grant Funds, Sources and Uses of Project Funds VI. Selection Criteria a. Innovation b. Support for Economic Vitality c. Life -Cycle Costs and State of Good Repair d. Project Readiness VII. Letters of Support a. HDR will provide a letter of support template for Iowa DOT and ICEA to provide to stakeholders. b. HDR will help Iowa DOT and ICEA develop a list of potential stakeholder supporters and track requests as they are made, and letters obtained. Deliverable: Completed CHBP Grant Application (Draft and Final) Key Assumptions 1. Up to 35 bridges will be analyzed for the grant application. 2. Existing Year Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes to be obtained via the Iowa DOT GIS traffic maps and confirmed by Cities / Counties via questionnaire. Page A-4 Exhibit A 3. Forecast Year Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Volumes to be derived from the iTRAM model in coordination with Iowa DOT. Bridges with forecast ADT not provided will be estimated with a sketch -planning approach based on travel -sheds for traffic and safety benefits. 4. Existing and proposed bridge barrier rail protection and existing and proposed bridge traveled width (face of barrier to face of barrier) to be provided by DOT / Cities / Counties via questionnaire. Any missing information to be provided by Iowa DOT via the SIIMS database. 5. Detour Route for bridge construction or for diverted trucks from load rated bridges to be provided by Cities / Counties via questionnaire. 6. Percentage of Trucks to be provided by Cities / Counties via questionnaire. For load rated bridges, the estimated daily traffic volume of trucks diverting to other crossings to be provided by Cities / Counties via questionnaire. For bridges with percent of trucks or estimated daily truck volume diverted not provided, the iTRAM model will be used to estimate percent of trucks. 7. Bridges to include in application, including year of proposed construction and construction costs for each bridge, will be provided by the DOT/City/County. Schedule HDR will begin to perform these services upon Notice -to -Proceed. Most of the scope deliverables will be completed within a 2-month period. A schedule for delivery of notable deliverables outlined above will be established in coordination with Iowa DOT and largely be based on the submittal requirements of the NOFO, released from USDOT on June 2, 2025 Notice to Proceed 6/4/2025 Final Application Package Submittal to Iowa DOT 7/31/2025 Contract Completion 8/15/2025 Page A-5 Exhibit B Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) Grant Project Bundle Information* Bridge Bundle 1 • Contract Authority: Woodbury County, Iowa oFHWA Structure Number(s): 053490, 053510 oTPMS number(s): 58062, 58063 • Budget and Funding: See to -era DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Brid a Sundle 2 Contract Authority: Emmet County, Iowa oFHWA Structure Number(s): 148850 oTPMS number(s): 58059 • Sioux County, Iowa c FHWA Structure Number(s): 309420 oTPMS number(s): 52259 Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Brid a Bundle 3 Contract Authority: Kossuth County, Iowa oFHWA Structure Number(s): 033040, 216631 oTPMS number(s): 55490, 55368 Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Brid a Bundle 4 • Contract Authority: Pocahontas County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 278401, 279211 oTPMS number(s): 58072, 58073 Budget and Funding: See Iowa DDT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Brid a Bundle 5 •Contract Authority: Iowa DOT oFHWA Structure Number(s): 052250 oTPMS number(s): 55678 • Webster County, Iowa oFHWA Structure Number(s): 343231, 000537 oTPMS number(s): 58068, 58069 • Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Brid a Bundle 6 • Contract Authority: Iowa DOT c FHWA Structure Number(s): 026880 oTPMS number(s): N/A • Worth County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 356251 cTPMS number(s): 58064 Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 7 • Contract Authority: Hancock County, IA o FHWA Structure Number(s): 173100, 173400 oTPMS number(s): 58061, 52981 • Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 8 • Contract Authority: Floyd County, Iowa oFHWA Structure Number(s): 025060, 025070 oTPMS number(s): 58060, 45029 Howard County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 028790 oTPMS number(s): 55178 • Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 9 • Contract Authority: Black Hawk County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 074350 cTPMS number(s): 37463 • Buchanan County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 016100 oTPMS number(s): 45587 ■ Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 10 • Contract Authority: Iowa DOT o FHWA Structure Number(s): 045760 oTPMS number(s): 55647 ■ Poweshiek County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 291900, 291910 oTPMS number(s): 58070, 58071 • Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 11 • Contract Authority: City of Iowa City, Iowa oFHWA Structure Number(s): 006390 oTPMS number(s): TBD ■ City of Davenport, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 003220 oTPMS number(s): 58076 • Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 12 • Contract Authority: Iowa DOT o FHWA Structure Number(s): 604370 oTPMS number(s): N/A ■ City of Mount Pleasant, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 180411 oTPMS number(s): 58077 Henry County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 028640 oTPMS number(s): 55107 • Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 13 Contract Authority: Keokuk County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 032640 oTPMS number(s): 42591 Marion County, Iowa oFHWA Structure Number(s): 239470 oTPMS number(s): 57674 Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application Bridge Bundle 14 • Contract Authority: Guthrie County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 167900, 168070 oTPMS number(s): 58067, 58074 ■ Page County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 266350 oTPMS number(s): 58066 • Pottawattamie County, Iowa o FHWA Structure Number(s): 285030 oTPMS number(s): 58065 • Budget and Funding: See Iowa DOT FY25 CHBP Grant Application *It is the intention to use the bundles presented in the application, but bundles are subject to change due to unforeseen conditions. Bundles will be formalized upon CHBP grant award via a post -award Iowa DOT funding agreement. Resolutions signed by partner agencies attached as part of this 28E agreement acknowledge a commitment to these partnerships and an endorsement of each bundle lead. July 8, 2025 The Honorable Sean Duffy Secretary of Transportation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary Duffy, � r 4 M44 -�...� CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE I am writing to express my strong support for the Competitive Highway Bridge Program (CHBP) grant application submitted by Iowa Department of Transportation, which includes the Kirkwood Avenue bridge in Iowa City. This project would reconstruct the existing bridge, which is listed in poor condition, into a safe and modern crossing. A new bridge will improve the safety, efficiency, connectivity, and reliability of this important connection in Iowa City. The project will have a direct positive impact to Iowa City residents and visitors by addressing items within the City Council's Strategic Plan: • Safety and Well -Being: The current structure is in poor condition. Reconstructing the existing bridge to modern design standards would maintain complete streets that are comfortable and safe for all users. This is especially important for the Kirkwood Avenue bridge, as it is located on one of the City's critical arterial roadways near our downtown area and Riverfront Crossings Park. • Mobility: By replacing the bridge, it ensures appropriate infrastructure is in place for future business growth and development. For these reasons, I, along with those I represent, would urge your strongest consideration of this application for the Kirkwood Avenue Bridge project to bring forward the critical safety and economic impacts this project would provide. City support demonstrates that our community and State understand the need for and importance of these critical bridge connections. Sincerely, Bruce Teague, Mayor Item Number: 7.a. a CITY OF IOWA CITY "QF T-4 COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Motion setting a public hearing for August 5, 2025 to consider an ordinance rezoning approximately 7.76 acres of land located on Lot 66, Monument Hills Final Plat from Low Density Single -Family Residential zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Low Density Multi -Family Residential zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM- 12). (REZ25-0007) Attachments: Final Staff Report with Attachments Late Correspondence Items_REZ25-0007 Council correspondence - Lawrence Luebbert Jr. STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ25-0007 Lot 66 of Monument Hills GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant/Owner: Contact Person: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Prepared by: Madison Conley Date: June 18, 2025 Monument Hills, LLC 221 E. Burlington St. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 (319)-631-1894 Michael Welch Shoemaker & Haaland 160 Holiday Rd. Coralville, Iowa 52241 mwelch(a�shoemaker-a) Rezoning of 7.76 acres from Low Density Single -Family Residential zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS- 5) to Low Density Multi -Family Residential zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12). To allow for the construction of a senior living community consisting of 3 duplexes and a 100-unit multi -family style independent living building. Northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and N. Scott Boulevard. 7.76 Acres Vacant, Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) zone. North: Single -Family and Harvest Preserve, Low Density Single - Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) & Interim Development Single -Family K Comprehensive Plan: Northeast District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District: Public Meeting Notification: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Residential (ID-RS) South: Single -Family, Low Density Single -Family Residential (RS- 5) East: Vacant, Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID- RS) West: Single -Family, Low Density Single -Family Residential with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) Conservation Design Town Homes and Small Apartments NE1 Property owners within 500' of the subject property received notification of the Planning and Zoning Commission public meeting. Rezoning signs were posted on the site at the corner of N. Scott Blvd and Rochester Ave. May 27, 2025 July 11, 2025 The applicant, Monument Hills, LLC, has requested a rezoning from Low Density Single -Family Residential zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RS-5) to Low Density Multi -Family Residential zone with a Planned Development Overlay (OPD/RM-12) for approximately 7.76 acres located on Lot 66 of Monument Hills subdivision northwest of Rochester Avenue and N. Scott Boulevard. The rezoning is required due to a change in ownership on the subject property. The proposed rezoning would allow for the construction of a senior living community consisting of 3 duplexes and a 100-unit multi -family style independent living building resulting in a total of 106 units on the subject property. The proposed development is shown in the Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan (Attachment 3). The subject property (Lot 66 of the Monument Hills subdivision) was created as part of the Monument Hills final plat and was rezoned and subdivided in 2022 and 2023. In terms of case history, here's a summary: On August 16, 2022 the City Council approved a rezoning (REZ22-0008 & Ord. No 22-4885) for approximately 64.38 acres of the property to OPD/RS-5 and 0.31 acres to OPD/ID-RS to accommodate the existing communications tower. The rezoning included the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall: 3 i. Dedicate a private access easement to the property hereby zoned OPD/ID-RS; ii. Dedicate a public access easement to allow a public trail from the proposed development to Calder Park in a form of agreement approved by the City Attorney and install a 10' wide trail therein; iii. Dedicate to the City, without compensation, right-of-way along Rochester Ave and N. Scott Blvd. b. The final plat for any of the above -described land shall incorporate traffic calming generally in locations shown on the attached Overall Concept Plan. All of these conditions have been met through the final platting and building permit review processes. In September 2022, the City adopted a resolution that approved the Preliminary Plat of the Monument Hills subdivision. (SUB22-0006 & Res. No 22-240). The City adopted a resolution in April 2023 that approved the Final Plat of Monument Hills subdivision (SUB22-0015 & Res. No 23-103) which shows a conservation easement on the subject property. During final platting staff also approved the Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan. See Attachments 4 and 5. Attachment 6 includes the applicant submittal materials such as the Rezoning Exhibit, the Applicant Statement, Elevations and an updated Traffic Study. The applicant conducted a Good Neighbor meeting on June 5, 2025. A summary of the meeting is included in Attachment 7. ANALYSIS - Current Zoning: The property is currently zoned OPD/RS-5. The OPD is intended to permit flexibility in the use and design of structures and land in situations where conventional development may not be appropriate. With the previous rezoning, the subject property was approved for 12 single-family homes, 3 duplexes, and a two-story, 29-unit multi -family building, and a private clubhouse for the residents resulting in a total of 47 units. The RS-5 allows larger lot sizes and setbacks creating neighborhoods with a limited density. While the proposed development contains duplexes and a multi -family building, the OPD process allows for a mixture of uses in the RS-5 zone. Proposed Zoning: The proposed zone is OPD/RM-12. The OPD is intended to permit flexibility in the use and design of structures and land in situations where conventional development may not be appropriate. The RM-12 zone is intended to provide for the development of high density, single-family housing and low density, multi -family housing. The Preliminary OPD Plan for this rezoning proposes 3 duplexes and a 3-story, 100-unit multi -family style independent living building for a total of 106 units. The RM-12 zone is intended to provide a diverse variety of housing options in neighborhoods throughout the city. Careful attention to site and building design is important to ensure that the various housing types in any one location are compatible with one another. General Planned Development Approval Criteria: Applications for Planned Development Rezonings are reviewed for compliance with the following standards according to Article 14-3A of the Iowa City Zoning Ordinance. CI 1. The density and design of the Planned Development will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of land use, building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation and general layout. Density - The OPD/RM-12 zone allows for a density of 15 dwelling units per net acre of land area (total land minus public and private streets right-of-way). The proposed development includes 106 dwelling units on 7.76 net acres. The proposed resulting density is 13.7 dwelling units per acre, which complies with the OPD/RM-12 density standard. Land Uses Proposed - The applicant is proposing the construction of a senior living community consisting of 3 duplexes and a 100-unit multi -family style independent living building. The addition of this senior housing will increase the diversity of housing types and help to satisfy an ongoing need for senior housing in the city. The Final Plat shows that there is an existing conservation easement at the northeast corner of the subject property. No development is allowed to occur in the conservation easement area due to the existing sensitive features. The proposed rezoning aims to continue to preserve and protect sensitive areas by clustering development and concentrating the more intense land uses near the arterial streets and away from the conservation easement. Lot 66 is adjacent to existing single-family lots and an outlot located to the north. The outlot, established through the approved Final Plat, contains a conservation easement that prohibits future development. As a result, no new construction can occur to the north of Lot 66 and the proposed development will not impact that area. Furthermore, the proposed development will be compatible with the adjacent single-family neighborhood, as any construction on Lot 66 must comply with the Multi -Family Site Development Standards, which are intended to support safe, attractive, and pedestrian -friendly neighborhoods. Mass, Scale and General Layout - The development will include duplexes that help balance out the larger multi -family building. The multi -family building will be 3 stories and will be required to comply with the Multi -Family Site Development Standards. These standards aim to promote attractive, pedestrian friendly neighborhoods by regulating parking, requiring screening of unsightly features and ensuring clearly identified pedestrian connections. Additionally, the proposed development locates the duplexes next to the existing single-family homes along Heron Dr. and places the larger scale multi -family building at the corner of the two arterial streets. This allows for a transition from single-family to multi -family. The applicant has requested two waivers from the RM-12 zone dimensional standards. One waiver from the height requirement and the other from the arterial street front setback requirement at the corner of Rochester Ave. and N. Scott Blvd. The first waiver requests an increase in the maximum building height from 35 feet to 40 feet for the multi -family building to address site topography and building aesthetics. The site is unique in the sense that it slopes and requires a building design suitable for changes in elevation. Additionally, the multi -family building aims to have a pitched roof compared to a flat roof to allow for vaulted ceilings. The OPD rezoning process allows applicants to request waivers from certain development standards, including building height. However, the following approval criteria must be met (1 4-3A-4K- 1 b): 1. The maximum building height and building coverage may be modified or waived, provided the design of the development results in sufficient light and air circulation for each building and adequate, accessible open space for all residents of the development. 9 The increased roof height would allow for vaulted ceilings and help aesthetically transition the appearance of the multi -family building into the surrounding style of the neighborhood. The applicant has provided staff with the Preliminary OPD Plan that lists the required open space for this use. The amount of required open space for Lot 66 is 10 square feet per bedroom. The proposed bedroom count for the duplexes and multi -family building is 182 bedrooms. Therefore, the total amount of required open space for the proposed development on Lot 66 is 1,820 square feet. Features of the open space areas for the residents include sports courts, swimming pool, garden, and a dog run. Staff will ensure this standard is met during site plan review. The second waiver request is to reduce the arterial street front setback requirement from 40 feet to 32 feet at the corner of Rochester Ave. and N. Scott Blvd. Both of these streets are arterial streets which require a setback of 40 feet. Through the OPD rezoning process, minimum setbacks may be reduced if the following conditions are met (14-3A-4K-1a) 1. The setbacks proposed will provide adequate light, air, and privacy between dwellings and between dwellings and public rights of way. 2. Sufficient setbacks are incorporated to provide the opportunity for adequate private open space for each dwelling unit. 3. The setbacks proposed will provide sufficient area for utilities and street trees. 4. If front setbacks are reduced, measures should be taken to preserve privacy within residential dwellings and to provide a transition between the public right of way and private property. To ensure privacy within single-family and two-family dwellings for which setbacks are reduced, the first floor must be elevated at least thirty inches (30") above the grade of the adjacent public sidewalk. Other methods to increase privacy are also encouraged, such as use of front porches. 5. Residential buildings that are located in close proximity to each other must be designed to preserve privacy. This can be achieved by placement of windows to prevent direct views into the windows of adjacent residential dwelling units. In addition, balconies and air conditioning units may not be located along a building wall that is within twenty feet (20') of a building wall of an adjacent principal building on the same lot, if the wall of the adjacent building contains window or door openings into dwelling units. Proximity of building walls will be subject to all current building code fire protection requirement. The multi -family building has been designed to accommodate the site's topographic conditions while maintaining compatibility with surrounding development. The Preliminary OPD Plan illustrates that the majority of the building frontage is set back more than 40 feet from the front property line. This setback provides space for street tree plantings, which will enhance neighborhood character and contribute to environmental quality. No reductions are proposed for any other setbacks, and all setback requirements will be verified during site plan review. Additionally, the plan demonstrates that the multi -family building is located more than 20 feet from the nearest duplexes, ensuring adequate separation between buildings. Based on these factors, staff finds the proposed front setback reduction to be appropriate. Open Space - The proposed development will need to comply with private open space standards, outlined in section 14-2A-4E of the City Code. The Preliminary OPD Plan for the senior living community requires 1,820 square feet of open space. These standards will be reviewed for compliance at site plan review. Traffic Circulation - The proposed development would include a private drive for the senior living community, which is proposed off of Heron Dr. to the west on the subject property. No access is proposed off of N. Scott Blvd or Rochester Ave. 2. The development will not overburden existing streets and utilities. C01 The subject property can be serviced by both sanitary sewer and water. Transportation Planning staff requested that the applicant submit an updated traffic study which examined how the proposed development on Lot 66, the 3 duplexes and 100-unit multi -family style independent living building, would impact traffic. The traffic study indicates that the total average daily trips generated by the proposed development on the subject property in addition to the 66 single-family homes included in the Monument Hills subdivision, is 1,004 new daily trips, which includes 69 new AM peak -hour trips, and 92 new PM peak -hour trips by the anticipated date the site is fully developed and occupied, 2026. The study analyses the following intersections at Rochester Ave: Scott Blvd., Heron Dr., Amhurst St., Teton Cr., and Allison Way. The study concludes that the intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable level -of - service (LOS) C or better in the 2026 baseline and 2026 future with development conditions during both the AM and PM peak hours. Staff has reviewed the traffic study and concurs with the analysis. 3. The development will not adversely affect views, light and air, property values and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a conventional development. A portion of Lot 66 and the area north of Lot 66 is in a protected conservation easement which would prevent any development within these areas. However, there are existing single-family homes located along Heron Dr. to the west and north. Additionally, there are also existing single-family homes across Rochester Ave. to the south of the subject property. The proposed development locates the duplexes next to the existing single-family homes along Heron Dr. and places the larger scale multi -family building at the corner of the two arterial streets. This allows for a transition from single-family to multi -family. The proposed development will be required to meet the Multi -Family Site Development Standards that include screening requirements which will help integrate the proposed development. For these reasons staff finds that this development will not impact neighboring residences more than a conventional development. 4. The combination of land uses and building types and any variation from the underlying zoning requirements or from City street standards will be in the public interest, in harmony with the purposes of this Title, and with other building regulations of the City. The Preliminary OPD Plan for the subject property incorporates two-family and multi -family uses. The combination of land uses provides a diversity of housing options and helps to satisfy an ongoing need for senior housing. In summary, the proposed project balances the need for environmental protection with the need for an increased housing supply and diversity of housing types. Rezoning Review Criteria: Staff uses the following two criteria in the review of rezonings: 1. Consistency with the comprehensive plan; 2. Compatibility with the existing neighborhood character. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The IC2030 Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Map has identified this area as appropriate for Conservation Design. Conservation Design is appropriate in areas containing steep slopes, woodlands, stream corridors, and other sensitive features. Building sites are identified to take advantage of the preserved land and create streets that minimize disturbance of natural areas. Developments with a conservation design should be more compact with less pavement and more open space than conventional development. The VA subject property has clustered development away from the environmentally sensitive areas and contains a conservation easement aimed to preserve and protect woodlands and sensitive slopes. The Northeast District Plan Future Land Use Map for the Bluffwood neighborhood (Figure 2) shows the subject property as appropriate for townhomes and small apartment buildings. The proposed development generally aligns with the land use envisioned by the plan since the proposed development provides duplexes that are a similar scale to single-family homes. The proposed multi -family style independent living building is more intense and is proposed at the intersection of Rochester Ave. and N. Scott Blvd. Figure 2. Northeast District Plan Future Land Use Map JU : # a +� i i �;► 3 17 Both the IC2030 Comprehensive Plan and Northeast District Plan encourage a diversity of housing options. The proposed rezoning would incorporate duplexes and a multi -family building on Lot 66 which would help diversify the surrounding housing stock, which is primarily single- family to the northwest and south of the subject property. Compatibility with Existing Neighborhood Character: The proposed 3 duplexes and 100- unit multi -family style independent living building is generally consistent with the existing neighborhood character. Existing single-family homes are located northwest and south of the subject property. The proposal locates the higher density development in the southeast corner of Lot 66. Concentrating the multi -family development on this area of the property, along the arterial streets, provides a transition of land uses from single family neighborhoods to higher density development. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject property contains steep slopes, critical slopes, woodlands, and wetlands. There is an approved Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan, Attachment 4, that will not change with this proposed rezoning. The conservation easement has been established as part of the Final Plat and the conservation easement that exists on the northeast portion of Lot 66 will remain. NEXT STEPS: Upon recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission, the City Council will hold a public hearing on the proposed rezoning. EV STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ25-0007, a proposal to rezone approximately 7.76 acres of land located on Lot 66 of Monument Hills subdivision northwest of Rochester Avenue and N. Scott Boulevard from OPD/RS-5 zone to OPD/RM-12 zone. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan 4. Approved Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan 5. Approved Final Plat 6. Applicant Submittal Materials 7. Good Neighbor Meeting Summary Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services ATTACHMENT 1 Location Map ATTACHMENT 2 Zoning Map ATTACHMENT 3 Preliminary Planned Development Overlay Plan NOTE: On June 5, Staff prbvj0-dj-he\a1i' txWith, several,�co� ���o �� � In set. As of thepublication\6 ` f1is en apaic� �Cet` e\r' \ sjbi1&had \ \ \\ \ ` I I I \ \ I ' I I \ I \ \ \ \ \ ` ` \ \ \ ` ` \ I ' o yetlO\������ \ \\t�(ff ar ti i�a�te \ \ \ \ \ I I \ \ \ \ , \ \ , I J \ v v v\ Vff vvvvv. vv.vvvvv vAa reVlSeCi Ian set, l ,b� � ve ' Jbi tbjh\&\F� 4(6b\& vOrlin 'O` S� mil, tin .I v v v v 11 1 v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v I v g g v ca OUT l v vvvvv�\ \ \\ I vVAv\ \Vvv \vv A\\ \\V/ / / vvvvvvvvvvvvvvv �� vv v �\ I I VA\A\\VA\VAA VAVAVA\VAA\ \ \ O�bA� �vvv�vv�� 0- ` v 1 \ vv A \ \ 1 v vv V A \\ V v vvvvvvv v v v vv 1 1 \ \ \V A\ \ VAVA \ VA EX15TI�IG\ V A V A \ \ \ \ 1 \ A \ A AA \ \ \ \ V AV V A\ \ A A\ \ o v \ � \ VA \\ \ VA \VA V\V A CO SEV Tlbl� \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ v \ \ \ I EA E E T ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ vvvvvv vv vvvvv� vvv vvvv \ \ I I I V A \ \ VA VAA \\ \ VAA AVA V\1 \ \ � o MbNU ETH'ILLS V A\ \ VA\ \ VA f - ��V N\ vl I I I V A V G v v v vvv\v � V AVA\\\VA\\V111� I / \ V �� vv�v�vvvv vvvvvvvv�� �v�/ / A \\AV VAVA VAA 1 LOT52 vv� I\AVA\I I11 I I I"/ / / / \AIIIIIIIIIIII,,,III I I % - 66- v /�� 76Ae / LOT531 — _ II 338 024 SF— v � � \ V A\ \ ��/ / ool t (ST) t V �� / ✓ j / / j/ / — — — /l l l l / \ \ V — / / LOT 18 0 'r / LOT 17 1 / // / A I / BUILDIKG �E-TBACK,/ �/ / �� ten✓ , � / � V / � /� � � / / / LOT 6—' E / n o LOTT 15 j� o/ �o / ono �i 00 C \ 0- LOT IC- / El v 0) / 00 LOT 13 / �. / — St Foy / 00 M SITE PLAN INVISION IOWA CITY INDEPENDENT LIVING PLANNONG I ARCMTEGTURE I oNTEMORS 25009 (SH PE 24418) genus [ landscape architects ] GENERAL SITE DATA: LOT INFORMATION: TOTAL LOT AREA 338,024 SF 7.76 AC 0 IMPERVIOUS AREA PAVEMENT (PARKING, DRIVES, SIDEWALKS) 51,715 SF 1.19 AC BUILDING COVERAGE - DUPLEX 11,340 SF 0.36 AC BUILDING COVERAGE - MULTI -FAMILY 62,920 SF 1.49 AC TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 115,975 SF 2.66 AC PERCENT IMPERVIOUS 34.3 % CURRENT ZONING LOW -DENSITY, SINGLE-FAMILY / PLANNED OVERLAY RS-5/OPD PROPOSED ZONING LOW -DENSITY, MULTI-FAMILIY / PLANNED OVERLAY RM-12/OPD UNIT DENSITY: DWELLING BEDROOMS TOTAL BUILDING INFORMATION UNITS PER UNIT BEDROOMS MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING ONE -BEDROOM UNITS 30 1 30 TWO -BEDROOM UNITS 70 2 140 Shoemaker �f Haaland 100 170 DUPLEX UNITS Q BUILDINGS) 6 2 12 SITE TOTAL 106 182 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE 10 SF PER BEDROOM x 182 BEDROOMS = 1,820 SF TOTAL UNITS 106 UNITS PER NET ACRE 106 / 7.76 = 13.7 ALLOWABLE UNITS PER NET ACRE (RM-12 PER CITY CODE TABLE 3A.1) = 15 PARKING MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING INTERIOR PARKING 110 SPACES EXTERIOR PARKING 25 SPACES DUPLEX UNITS GARAGE 1 SPACE x 6 UNITS 6 SPACES DRIVEWAY 1 SPACE x 6 UNITS 6 SPACES TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 147 SPACES PARKING REQUIRED (ELDER HOUSING) 1 SPACE PER UNIT 106 SPACES RM-12 BASE ZONE DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS DUPLEX LOT AREA - MINIMUM 6,000 SF AREA PER UNIT 3,000 SF OPEN SPACE 300 SF PER UNIT LOT WIDTH 55 FEET LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET SETBACKS FRONT * 15 FEET SIDE 5 FEET REAR 20 FEET * GARAGE, IF FRONT FACING, MUST BE SETBACK 25 FEET MULTI -FAMILY LOT AREA - MINIMUM 8,175 SF AREA PER UNIT - ALL TYPES 2,725 SF OPEN SPACE 10 SF / BEDROOM LOT WIDTH 60 FEET LOT FRONTAGE 40 FEET SETBACKS FRONT * 20 FEET SIDE 10 FEET REAR 20 FEET * 40 FOOT SETBACK REQUIRED ALONG ROCHESTER & N. SCOTT APPLICANT REQUESTS 32' SETBACK AT THE CORNER OF N. SCOTT & ROCHESTER REQUESTED WAIVERS 1. REQUEST AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT FROM 35' TO 40' FOR THE MULTI -FAMILY BUILDING TO ADDRESS SITE TOPOGRAPHY (GRADE PLAN CALCULATION). 2. REQUEST CONTINUATION OF THE SETBACK REDUCTION GRANTED DURING PREVIOUS REZONING AT THE CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND N. SCOTT BOULEVARD TO REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM 40' TO 30'. NELSON CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT SCALE: AS NOTED DATE: 05.19.25 SHEET: C200 ATTACHMENT 4 Approved Final Sensitive Areas Development Plan a co M N O N 04 0 0 HARVEST PRESERVE V �I FOUNDATION, INC 4 / '' � �/ y• 1 � ` �,/ it T+ HARVEST PRESERVE FOUNDATION, INC FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND SENSITIVE AREAS Y �� -V ULVLLUFML1N I FLAIN Vj / HARVEST PRES RVE / OUTLOT F 42 a 43........................ M N M NT HILLS �•I •� .• ' ry / FOUNDATION, =INC �HnRVEST PRESERVE � , w 44 x \ / �RL ,k''• / OU0v TLOT E 4� HICKO _ / / / cjT CIT F IOWA �� c 40 I uv �� IOWA I TY IOWA CALDER PARK \ y / / ��aK�—uLx uLVL 39 X .,t� �'—,� �uL A \ �I 0 W \ / �';,� OUTLOT A �l 57 I.ti� CITY OF IOWA CITY � � �SNO� 36 47 OUTLOT C 0 r 59 37 \ 56 x titi 60 x 8 J oC -_ ---- „�/ 55 x APPLICATIONNOTES I T x \ 4 €€ i x 49 �. NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS \ 61 ::: '� :+: \ 4 65> `< w WILL BE MET VIA DEDICATION OF OUTLOT E TO + 64 x � v 63 THE CITY OF IOWA CITY. IL 50 v 1'-'�' �\ �' � I THE FINAL OPD AND SADP FOR LOT 66 WILL BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF MAJOR SITE PLAN : APPLICATION FOR LOT 66. ROCHESTER \ � 29 I �. HILLS / 28 5 CONDOMINIUM \ </I,�� 27 26 25 24 x MN • - I - LIL=.C:::::::.'4;5���:::::::lye 66 \ /20 �y - x x 19 x :� .. x x .:I 17 x I w I I I x -ti a u I ieieieieieieieieieieieie:eieieieieieieieieieieieieieieieieiei::. f x 16 / ' x \ \ 12 +I I I €:: 2 \ SHEET INDEX / •r 7ti 14 's \ SHEET SHEET NAME y i'ti i • Fr, 4 !F 1. COVER SHEET - I C 00 CO / .i 1 - k .'ti :: 3 C1.10 REGULATED SLOPES 4 • I y \ ; �C1.20 WOODLANDS � � � :. �_. � C1.30 WETLANDS -1 : \ '- L \ O C2.00 OUTLOT E & F SLOPES AND WETLANDS k/� \ 5 �\ G 4 \ C2.10 OUTLOT E & F WOODLANDS :.. fit \ . \• L. J \/ i r - \ a 68 C _ Z U \r / J N V J F ; ��V '� '� �� .• \t V \;rL ,� 7 r ... _ J .': ' l4 G J oo � -'_X OUTLOT A /J \ -5 \ r t1� \ . .... ............ , y.................................... / - . — ..................................... _ LEGEND cn ' _ LL rt - / REGULATED SLOPES: / .......... i I—°f,��• \ \:—.� \ ,. 1,• .• / STEEP SLOPE 1 °/ —2 °/ 5 r•\ / Y �. / �. �' Aw ......................A ; �VIE 01 CRITICAL SLOPE 25%-40% :~V \ \ / /- \ J '•' } : 7-• -\ n - r �__ PROTECTED SLOPE (>40%) _� , , — PROTECTED SLOPE —BUFFER TREELINE — — 9 �•_. /f / / CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS j +7�y[, �- —III MOUNTAIN DR z I Awn w i - '_ GREEN r f / r F -- �, / _ ; ', r // /��' ����� WETLANDS: �7_Z" WETLANDS WL BUFFER — 100' a APPLICANT INFORMATION PROPERTY OWNER MONUMENT FARMS, LLC 3810 PERTERSON PL NORTH LIBERTY, IA 52317 DEVELOPER MONUMENT HILLS, LLC 221 E BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 631-1894 CIVIL ENGINEER WELCH DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT MICHAEL J. WELCH, PE PO BOX 679 NORTH LIBERTY, IA 52317 319 214-7501 0 75 150 225 300 WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEET 1" = 150' ENGINEER: we c design develo ment � p CLIENT: MONUMENT HILLS, LLC PRO3ECT NAME: MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY, IOWA REVISION LOG: REV DESCRIPTION DATE — CITY REVIEW # 1 10-07-22 A RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #2 02-27-23 B RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #3 03-09-23 C RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #4 03-21-23 SHEET NAME: COVER SHEET FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN PR03ECT NO: PR03ECT MANAGER: SHEET NUMBER: 1026 WELCH REVISION: ISSUED DATE: CI-00 C 03-21-2023 0 1ri M N O N 04 0 w r __ _- - HARVEST PRESERVE \ \ _ - HARVEST PRESERVE 'r'" --- - '>''------- FOUNDATION, INC - - \ r 7 -0 � - \,- / I(,%-, , I-- ,\--�\T— \_I,-, ___0-I-_11 ,_t--\_-__MV_ D --� x, _� -T) , —\ -_ -\ I /" I/ , " � 1-- --`,,,­�"_ �\ i�\ . "'_-!\V-- -,_ 1I\� ,,- ,, - I,_ , --" II_ 3 ,-\ \-"-- I ,, , -\ \-,i� �";I 1-1-,1IIiI /I- -- \I -\ ;�@(I� \\ _ /'\ I�\ _- -Qr_\\ , N � - - ----- X - - - - _ -- FOUNDATION INC I %- X- ---- - y � I; ; __ --- -- ' - , , -6� - , -,1; ' --------- - -� I ---------- AC INC I , - - - - --- ---- - _ _ --- ------ _ S _ - -- _ - : - , - ; �,----- Z2o---------------- ' _ - --- - -- ------ -� ,-4I , M 0 N U M E N T --- J --- ; ` - _- _� _-- ----- -- --------------- -- ; � ---- � Y ------ - __ ----------- ------ --- ---- `;� `<\ FARMS , LLC \ Ii II 1 \\n w— IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIeIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIIII II IIIIc IIII I \ „ --- --- - - - ----- ---- -- ,, / 1 `_ �, I , / _ r /i; , ' I / I ' ' I ' ; ; ; ,1, ; I - ; ----- -____ -- _------------------------------ ---- ----- - _ ��`� \ --- -- 1 , 1- �:�:` -, _ _ ; , ,;' l ------ A 1 l 11 _\�\�,, ,-;1�\\� \-� r I r' < �,,� / 1 , ' 1 n , ----- -- - ---_ i ; ; /-- ---- _ G - ' — = v x 1,,1 1 l 1, % ;' ' l �,�� Iv 1 _------ ------------------ __ --- ------- �� `r �.:.� �. A w '' _ - ,------- _--- x �' 1 ��-' / 1 / ''� �--'�� �/��- , .r -_-, i : �'i ,' � 1�� I i ' i I III-r-�A � ` '�r it I� i1 / � _-'' -------------- X_ '-"__ - -- �� � ���.� � 1 O' ,.,: - I`` _ ,\ � _- 1'.1 : I , _, I , " i , ` - - - - 1 1 I I, ---------- --___ __ ___ \` �`l;• -/, ." -4'6` - —.� ,ill ' , , / 1 -�1 1 1 v +- - 1 1 I i I - ---- ---- AI. e �, � ) I /yam � __�--'-_" - _ Q'% 1 �'" - - - - - -�'- _ ----- _ _ , �B12 + -„ „, - - r--- I i --,'---a6=---us = -- _ _ - - , , 11 � \ V - I . , , . / - , 5_7:1 - - y A - - - - 1 i _----- - r _ �� ' r , , i= r- -�-i- 1 , I i - _ a\ r B 14 ;' \ \ \ s t _ ��'� - -- -- ------ _ __ -- ,� \ I , 1 CIT� -0-r - -- " - - _ _ __ � - 1 1 1 _ --- - --t- - --- y. ;,: �:.. ;. ! " A - \. --- -- J �' _- - _ - -__ _ I a+, _ ,,�,- / mot` 1 i-r-r_ �' i 1 i - - x _ - . , �.'�,.`°e.A' < �, 'IOWA CITY- - - �! - _----- _---- -- _ 1 - ----- -__ - - \ --- ' �'Yi ` - %- "-- *,k . t , - i - - _ 1 V r 1 , ' 1 i � - - _ - � �, � ` r a � ' � a. �, V-\-\y�—'/��L A ___--- -----' ``- - \1'I ,,I --_/ / �, ' ', ," _-_ / / 1 ,� i 1 1, 1 % - __-_- .`` ' . I. V J i' ---------- - ;;, , u� �� - _ - - -- - _ - r __ - - -- / - _ --- 1 - �\ ----- u --� / --- ----- - 1 I 1 1 -- -_ - y, y - MONUMENT _ _- _ - - - 1' W,- 1\ C` ' / , i - - - l �� , ,,'1 I I , 1 I X `` \� \il i �, _ - _ FARMS LLC - V - - yv -- - - ' - - �\ - ! V - I 1' 1 \� / 1 , _ - _ I I --- - �.. __ I k 1 / - 7 I I- - I 1 - I % 1 i - - 1 - 1 7 - 1 �I --- r 11 1 1 O A 1 `, -� , �' 1, //// ' ' / - - _ - 1 1 , 1 7 - '' %� / - - _ - 1 QO �� i 1 ��i - 1 n n - I �v , I - ' \ '' --=� '' f i , , . % ' : _ `�'-ram' - ----- 1 I I , I I I� �C' , 1. T' ' , ! 1 `.�., 1 ,' V' /yam \ _ - I it 1 i (yI ILQ` \ f..` HARVEST PRERVE ',�", - -- - 1 I �- --- - 1 I I �' X , '' _ ,�', I , 1 - - l I �i 1 = - ---- - ' 1 1 I 11 I 1 / 1�'� V�1' 1 '\ �. J / - - 1 - I I - 1 .J FOUND �1"bN INC _ _ I , I I 1 •. 1'I 1 / ! - 1 I I I / � I f r I I 1 I I 1 `-} 1 1 4 �' ,I 1 1 `��'� 1 - i'I I - 1 i� I �` I I Y _ 1 i 1 1 � i1 1 I - 1 1 11 I � I .A` �' I I r. S ��� I i I 4 _ I - - I, I �_ I � t� 4\ - - 1 1 I 1 1 - 1 - - 1 I \ 1 1 ,\ 11 �� Q 1 \ 1 �, �_ - L � - , 1 - W 1 1 _ - 1 I 1 �., �` 1 - _ I 1 '� I f1 - , 1 I _ - 1 I 1 I I 1 I , _ ti I �YY 1 1 0 ' r �, �, - Y� 1 1 1 J ti2�` - - I - I a, i V I 11 1 G1 1 1, 11 y ',x�', - - I 1 _ �.'-F-��. 1 1 1 1 , , �i I I ��u \ 1 I > - _ �ti , a v r _ `. F ->. , , / . . . . v _ _ _ _ _ - ---- . " , r . _ _ . - __ - - ---- _ _ _ _ _ _ I 1 __ I r=c�c�� �\ 1�1 1 , ' I ! v . _ I I �� v I % v . , . ---_ - -- -- B ; I I , 11 vv - - - - a ♦ � , I ------ - - _ --- - I `�� 1 ---, - --- -- , ` _ -- 1 ' --- 10 - LEGEND: REGULATED SLOPES ' A �� _ - I - .� �� I _ �B -- ���• - - - - _ , A -- _ _ ,-' 1 - - - - - - - --- - - - - -- - , - -- ' - , A'`, A -- - ---- - ''I vI , , , �'� '� - -- -- / - fF 1 , ', 1' - - - - - - - 1 I Sa-1--r-=-F 4 T-i 1 ��__ - 1 1 O.- -- _ =F= ��� �` TEEP L PE 1 / 2 / �' 1 I 1 1 } — z1 , ' - 1-i-1 , = I I-, '\ �' 1 , A , '-"' -- - - - -- - _ _ T- - 1 ' I 1` az ---T_, -- _ _ -- I 1 `. -�--c 'c---A- 1 - _ 1 ---- 1 � '1 ------- A I A �•� I I ) 'I A --i-1- -- - - - , t_ 1� I 1 - - - - -- - i _3� �t �`, , vi I 1 x - --- -- --- ` x - p , , , , , I ________________________________ A v`v �� ` ` ` `� A `. , 1 - - - - - ___ __ __ - - __ __ -- _____ - - - - - - - v I v �_ - I 1 \' I v vv v I - I I I I - - __________ __ , , , - _--_ STEEP SLOPE IMPACTED -- B8� --------- �__ x , - t x'1 ��� - B.9 1 _, o I I ` . . . . ___ , , , , � , , , , , ---- _ , , - i-F �- - — - - - - - -+.:tom- - - - I I 1 -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ' 1 - ---- �, 1 1 ' ------------------ v -- - - A `• �`� '� �, �' 1 v` ---- r _--- 1 I I o_ o -------- --- _ A x 1 - - / 1 --- ,-' ----- v I - - 1 --- �'-ti o 1 1 CRITICAL SLOPE 25 /0 40 /o �1 ----- _ �. . , , . , , , . ` t ------ ` ♦ . . , , 1 , . `. ` 1 , -- - - --t-� - - 11 1 I --- -- - - --- - -- -- -- -- -- ---- , 111 1 ' 1 --- r i I - - -------- - - I ---------------- __ , ` - -- I -- -- -- - - --- ---- - - -- , --- -- I — - - ,'% I CRITICAL SLOPE IMPACTED ---- _ _ _ --- - --- v -- -v ' " , , , .1 , 1 , -- - ---- I 7-- --- r _ d - - - / ---- --- _ _ . . - . . _ -- _ ,. ._ _ , , , .� , , X _ . , a -- - - - 1 1 - - - I ----------� . V . , , 1 ----- ' , X , , , ---- - ' --'x \ - , _ -'i I -_ _ _. �. _, ky 'x_� 1 � ��. ! PR TE ED L PE >4 °/ - - ---- ------ ------ - 1 , , - _ 0 CT S 0 ( 0 ) - in 4 — x�— - O ,' O" -- 1 T v , 1 �— i -- s -- - _ _ , r : ,— �. - I vi - __ - s - - - -- 1 Imo, �=�� � . - - o A I , - - p -- { Cp __ _ _ _ ____ I A - - - - - - - _ 1 - - __ , I 1 PR TE ED L PE B FFER ___ -- 0 CT S 0 U 1 _ - I , - �l I , i 1 L , ---- _ _ ----- - ..-- +<, I l _ _ - Q - �' `� - 1 T \1 I' r 1\ I - _ d J 1 1 /y 1 - 1 v A /i ' ! ) V 1 r_ r• r• r_ r _ _ _ - _�\ B 7 \ CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS --- - _ i - - ,---- ` `� \ , , , \ , -- , ,/ -,-- - - __�__ __�____ i I - �� j _ R ' 4 t `�! ` 11 `\ --,-- - --1 ' , - 1 yI r _ - ♦ \ \ \ \ ♦ \ \may ti � I t. - , - -v - - A , _ _ - ,� 'I __ - -- v- � � _ �--- � ��:� �. -_ -_ "`��� %� - � � fps, DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY v -- ' ---- - . I 1 J — - �... < �' ' + - J , --- • - v . . A A , . , - , I I - - --- - ' - - - - - - - -- - -- -- - 1 - - -- - r v I , .------------- -- - - - - - - Z , ' � � FAY. I 1 ' , , - ____ \� � \, I _ ' , , - -_ v I 1 t ,, , / ,. r - -_ _� — - - --- - � �.� Jh _ ?� �:� `��: ��. I � --- __ � NOTE: J- , , , , I ------ - - v 1 ---- ' v , 1 i-------------------- " - - - - _ - - - v , � I I , , , , , ,- ,- ,- r ,-------_ _,_ �.. ,,.�� ,- -- -_ _ _ � Jn ,. _- 1 I _ _ � ES WITHIN i _ _ x -- ` - _ r 1`,', 1 --- THERE ARE NO PROTECTED SLOP v A A , A A , 1 V ' , , 1 , , , , , , _ I ,--- _ A --_ - ---- - - - -- - -- - --_--_ -- - i , 1 v` , I I ,, 1 � ,- __--- - A.4 --- __--_-------�-- ,�-'-� ��:�-y�-'=�:`. �,•,,vv. wL I `, , ,,, _ , I,, I , - - THE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY 1, -- -- - ' v , , , I � ' - ' ` , , , , 1 1 , , ,� / ; ; , , 1 i Y1 , 1 i �. , % i _ ______-___ __ _ _ __ �I°\\ ..i ! J,, \ \�\\%/ 1 _ _` - _____J __ _ _ _ /' m, i �jiy��� \ � , O 1, iF .- - ----- I , ' 1 I I 1 I i , , , ; , , , , , \\ \ l , v----------------- ; / / / ; %' I ;' , f/M '---R--------- --- A - --- '�: � ` :. � 4< — 9L — ul 11 `;` �o; �j ' 11 - - - /' ; -- - REFER TO SHEET C2.00 FOR GRADING PLAN _ , , 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ' , I , , - - - _ - ----I , 1 1 1 1 1 ', I ' 1 ' ` , 1 \ \ ` \\ -\ '--- '\ % / i ,k i i I I % ' - _ \ Jn �1, \� 11 \ � \ -- ----'' 1\ i - - _ -- ---- , I e• ' 1 , 1 ,1, v v . - , A , , �t I , , �� ,------'- ----- --- >- �: A��::, ! I �Ib I - �:A �� Sty -- v 1 1 I 1 I ' ', i ` - v - A v` v, ------ ,, / l , f _ - ----- A.. :A�::� 4 " i I 1 ayv y %------- 1 I 1 1 I 1 --_------- I -- - - -- \ - - - - -- - 1� I I I 1 , , , A _ ----, A , I A 1 ' ' ----- - -- _ ---_-- - _ - 1 1 1 ' / 1 , 1 I � ' .� ---- , v 1 1 ' ' 1 ' 1 , -- , 1 , 1 Il 1, \ I I 1 1 1, .'I, 1, I ' , v I 1 , 1 1 1 , Ivv v1v I - /, '; - - /, 1 1 , , / , , , ,' / , ,� ; ;/,%; ; , , ; / `V 'v v Av;�A 'v,Iv, ; ` _ __ - ---- ---- ----=-V..�': .IC. �\\fit \vv �, 11 V I - ------ -- - �.a- _- 1 , , ' ' ' ' / ,' ,,-'-,,' - ! ' ---- - ---- ---- -- - - - -----_ - ' I I , I , i �, i _-' - _ ---- r Jk ', v` „ \ , , � i I , , , _ ____________ _ _ „ , , ,, __________ __ __ - __ ___ - --_ _- 1 _ B _- � :, A 's I ' , 1 A ,, ; --- _ vv:; 1::.1 ----- ���� I %�, 1 I v IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPES: _ y r , , , r , r i i %i , , i; ,' - - ' ,�/ , --- ,J' \ \ \\�"\`. i- \ C - __ _ _ \.\ >`. .4. s v " 1 , 11 I 1 i / / / , /----------- 11 ' -- -- i v 11 v` e. A, � A,' ` 1 _ - - -- � f , I ---- , _ /, _ it ' ; , ---- I I v - - - LOCATION AREA (SF) H / t _ i. I -- _ , 1 4 Y' _ _-- _ - ��. o IMPACTED STEEP SLOPES: B i / _ �� ;` , --f I i ----- A 0 50 100 150 200 /' , ' l J - __,' - - -- v - �� - - �- _ ' ; ; r%? ;� \\ LOTION AREA SF) B.2 7 791 ,,' ; ' , 1 ----- --- --- --- --- - 1 / 1 1 , I; 1 ( I - _ ---- -- s>vv � .�' t t -' i _- \\ — WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEET I I , �`!' _ __ A 11 1 I I , , , , v ', .� , v 1 / 1 1 1 1, ',1, 1 I \ - - ____ _____-- ) \ \ �\�A�R ' - \ 1 _ 1 \ 1 , I\ O' ,` - - - x'V `I A , _ I` --- /,' '�:'-----�\V\v I '�� �_`�� 1; -- --.�,` -- -- -- - - - - ---' - --- o !r.- ' --- �- \ A.1 1,069 B.3 23,809\- - - I - \1 - ---- pp / x.� - \ O O ENGINEER:v , �,1 v v `v , - - ---- \I ` 11 v _ -1 --11 A v /' i v I i -- ii�� ! , A v __ _� __� ____ _______ _� _ _ _ ._8p r+cm _-____ u / " A \ /- \ 11 11 v 11 `--- i WOP i i i _ i 1" - i i 1-- I - - ---- - - -- - - - 11 /� I _ I \, 1� _ I --__ A v v v v 1 �I 1 __ A.2 7 018 B.4 15 342 \ --' I :a , , , ---- 1 , ; , `s 1 - 11 \, - --F �_ _- - -- - - ___ ---- / /. /j' / / , , , I , \ \ \ \ , \ - 1 \ \ `. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 \ \ �� , I / III ' ' ' - ___ '-,\`� \\\`` I 1 -- / \,,, 1 � \ \ \ \ \ \ ' = \ \ \\ \\ 11 \ \ ♦ \ \ \ . - _-- , , I i I , 1 ' /, " �\\ I I 1 u ��-a�°� ,n ___ I 1 = _ - ___ __ - - --`\'----' i� /. I I �y ----- , , s; 1 ; % I 1 �.:. �.,;.;'' --- �4 .. 1 I 4 274 B.5 9 769 l \ B.3 / I , 1 ' , ' , __ -A, v--'' i1 i1 i i i�,'-' " i' i 1 1 , _ _-_ - ___ __ - -I- _� I / _� �V A v v 11 v v v `v Av vv ` J , �. ` / J 11 \ \I \ \ 11 ; i ,, / A '�� , / , ' i , ' , __ - \\\, \ \ 1\ \\ \\ I , ; ,``.1.` \` \ I , i �Y�r�•��'� ,,, _ ___ ___ __ __ _____F_ _ _ I \ " / \ / \ \ J I v I v , 1 1 �; -f - „ , , I v �' i ; ; . J --- ' ,, _ __ - --- - - - -- -- -I-t - 1 � � - " , \\ ' _I \1_-"\\\I, I1i 1 -1��\ \ \- -,\I , I 1\ A"1, \ \_ "1- -�\\ " \�" \,�\ \-'"\ \\-\ ,\\, - \,1, 1�\,,1 _\1",-,%, ,-, "_1%\ ,,_\-\ - II :I 1",/�_, I- %\\_\\ \', '\, %-,% :, ,\ I\I _1:I%"--'--­", 1\""\, _-\\\\"/ ,, -z\, -,I %'I \ I \-_ \, I%\\ :-I\," A I,- —\ \ -i \-\ %',-'_\\", —\\, � \ -\\ _1\\_--\;�-"1\,"1 \"-" '" _,--1 , \i --\--/P\,.,-:-'/%-1_S, \V7_I\_%, ,\ - --_ -\ \ 1I_\ ,, 1 \ ,-,"-I \ / -\\_\,, ',\,E3%I:,-"-\/ " \IV_-, , W-!-,1; \,, ,'_ -�_, ,, ,\�_ /L,%_- \ -, " -,_\ ,,/)'_",;," .-31!1 ,-_\1/ ;,91_3�-c_/ I:,I ,,,_, \/e:_- ' -1- -/\-.-,1,i' _/ ,�, _,—\- , - ", ,- 1//I__, I-\\ "-\l\1 -lI,-,_ �,iO_, ,/" - \ i" 1 , , ; , - ; ; ' , I / % , ; ' ; :1'I'° '�.1.v -'- L . ', � --- ---------- _,_ *, 1 � 75 2 92 ,' I - -;d,,, /� I , --- /; I .��� 1-� -, V A A.4 3,2 B.6 1,5 ` v , 11 \ i I i i i ' i� ` ,-' J,- i i I i i 11 vv v V i ' v', % r 'L�y°e°y _ '/'v ____ - - - - i / / / i- 1 11 ,,I it ,, A AI A\ \IA , ----- -_---- i, , I aG ��� _/ �_. 1 - �.. v I v v v „ v ,- ,= v 1 1;;;,;, 1 I ;; ; ; , 1 _ ---- - 1 _ de i n+develo ment G p 1 1 , \ _ A.5 13 122 B 46010, 6 010 I \ \ \ ♦ ` , I 1 I , , , , , 1 , I I 1 / , ,-,-' / i , , , r \\\ \\ \\\ \\\\ , I. ' j�.a .. \� �y _ _ ' 1 I 1 ` /.. 11 , I 1 , , • , , , i , , r , r ____________ _ _ _ O > I vv I , , , , ", "/i'/' --- ' , r, i r , , , /' 11vv ��\- i 1,�' �`�,�� - - - - - - /.- 11 v v . v . I I 1 ' r , , , ; r; , , ; vG , , , , , , , r . v v v I ` ---- i - 1yice. - - , i CLIENT: / l,;' __ A`,;y;`.v` ��' -- __ 0 I I ' l , ; , i , - �,� _ y, " / � ---_ __- _-, p - A.6 2 538 B.8 8 001 \ �--- -\_- _II--,\--�_-_1I- � \�- _ -- -7-,":, ,-\ - I -I . ,--/--1_,-I-\i \1%���-__,_'\%,,1,�N_--," �\7]���-',// , - -- �_ 1VA,/_I —._1- ,I ,,---"-,I, I_I\\-"I \_\, \'1I �__\A �,n, , ;; , '. , , o= ___--I _/ a I MONUMENT HILLS LLC ' - - 2 67 1 96 r I - 1 1 ; ; !; , ' l ! l ; 1 ; / -- �`.;.;. �, _ _ , / , f"� _ — — 4'4 �'S PROJECT NAME ----- - - �\ �V A A 7 B 9 \, A 11 , , 1 , 1 ' 1, , , 1 , ; v -I,\\- 1 1 1 1 ' � I �j �r y' ,JI �'(�I,' _I _I,I-:�,-__I ,,-� -- , -- ","%-_�-"___",-,-";.-1__,,,I_:-- _ \-1 __-1,,-\�-"-"_,_\\'-_\,-_,/,-\-_-/" _-_-_\­1I/-"-,-\-\\I--, " \ -'I\I_-� --\� -, --"\ /-_\ -1_ --_-\\\\ -"\- "-- ,__- --',\--\ --_ I -%_I - - \ -" "I ,_,-�-_ ,,I_-, ,\/ _ \- \_ _ ---, _-,_-, -"\\_,\-_,\\-_. , %I\ \\ -\- -',1, 1 %\- -_1\ % ,1 - -4,\ -- " II --__,1_f.,"1" \- \\-,,-/ ,,,\ %1,v- "- -,,,%\\, , - 1__, %\- / /,\ ",__,,/. , \,/_\\\\\,� -1\,/ -/% /IiI ,�,\, I ' B2 111'!11 - ' ;��',;/ -- -- _ - -- �\ �\,\. _V _ —� I MONUMENT HILLS _z�M3Z�:z<z2��0ML_NnI)-) )_jjj. �>/\/II--�"--_--/ ---, /---- - 1----_----__-,----,-I / --,,_TI _//-----_I//_,�-//I- ------/--, - 1_/-I/ ,"--_--_, ,� -_-,,- _---/--- / _,-," I --/,/ -,/,,-- ; - ;_�--, I/ ;-D, -I-/ �---- "%"--- ,_/�-.�--__- --1-I ,,, - ---�,,� -- /\ %I_-I-,/_-__I_I--:,-­\1--/- --__- , ""1I-__\_-, /-_--_" 1_,\--,/-: 1- -_---_-_ , --_-," - -__--"-I-,"-,_,I,`I,--/ --- \r--__-, I- _ \-__ \- \,,,\_-'__I/ ,\ ,--,/- - �--__ ,-, `,/"-_,"I --__ _-', " --/, -1_,_,/,,--,� _ -,-_I,,_- ---"/_-/1-,'-1-I- ,/-,/-,,_-"--1--_,"_--,_-, ,1\-,'__/ \--/\\--_I--\\,--1� �\--"\_"", ----_ -,\�:\I -"\-E_1-A1-/-,,,---\" -\- \- :_- \I-, --_/,1, --11_-, " k-\-" /,---,:" \-__\I--,11 -- -1z\ ---"-"/1, -_--\ _­1"-"1,--/f_-l-,Z ----_\,-"_--',�_ ,,-\\--_-- "I"-�-, - _-I%I�II/_—,--,7�I_" \,---\, ,-----_, - -S\-1- ,",,`-___-­'I/I -,\--\',\----% _-_--, --,)\ ,_I -_\,1-­I/ ---1"- \_-\�_- - __,\ _-,I,- " /, - -_% \I,\\�II---I_/:I-_ ,I _-_\,,:_",-, "" \ , I---- _­-\-"__--\-- _,,1\ -_`--, I %----_ --\1 ,X-,_ -, ,\_"-- ,I -1­--,--_- -- \,-- _" \-- ,"-\--1, -%I -,\ --1�//_-,I--\I \---1 \ /_\\ -\ -'\-/-,--\__-1\\---)1 -'\ _'I \-, ,,/-/\1 -\ -,/, --I -_-, -----_-p __::i -� 1,�-\\ 1 -,\,\- ,-__-,-­__\--, -"_-/"\�I--\I,I 1-\ _:,_I;_- '- \ _,--_I/I-,_--\�" ,I '-.I � ---/"_\0 I,_-, \ --�_" --L--__--� 1-'\-�/-_-"\\" ,�-i,_-\I_-_, ---�"—/";_-_-- ,/ - I\ . -1,_-, --\\\,-\ "/__-1__-I I,,_--\_-/�I-- I-i'__%\""1I;,_-" _-1 -\_-:,/---\ ;1_- /\ %- % 1--f-_-�_--7_l,-\,__,1\-, ­"I-%/I1,1.�-, -"\__-,_" 1 , --�\1 -\1-_--,__i_ -1l ,I' -"" ,_\,-1,1,\-\_,-_,\ -�"\\ /` 1",I_1 _ / , ,/Z_�-" , \: /-1, , ,_'I1,_," ,,--_ I ,; \ 1,-__--\, , -�\_- ,I ," iI-,-; "--I-I_/-I , \-, _iI� ,_ 1 ,1- , %, -,, \\ - -I -,_,-'�;-,I1,\,,_1,_,\j,�,- _"�-,1I,-1-X ,, \�l\i1,-:%I_;1 %_\ , _ ,\-_),-1,1""I, -,­_,'Z_,_\\- %-_111,,,1.",1 \, __,," ___,1 ,,_ 1�\ --, _-\�\1, I,' _ / "\ \,, -" _, \ ,, --, ,�\ 1_,1i_ I ` /-_,, " _"1-" � j,i"'; ,/,%_ I_-\ \_ ,,—_ ,,, "-I", , 1,,,\ ,\ �,, � - :_,/,� 1"Y_,-I,_r \,I,\� :, I ""I1,, �;;1\-_, I� ,_,,1, ` _ _1,-1,,, ,,\1 , ,1"--_\/\\ "\- i1 -, _,\\\ \%,.-\ "y \ \\-1-\'-.-I"%,:\ \(_""\-. , ' I , I - I I ' ' ' _'�' ! % - ------ , % --\ = -- _= _ = i V \ A.8 5,536 B.10 11,465 1, \ I `;,1`I --.4' ; ; ; ;'; ;' / �,�-� �.: :`\\�'_ - , __ \ __E�/ IOWA CITY, IOWA N \wv� 11 ; 1 ; % �� � � I -' .. � - -�___ �� V A \ \ \ \ �� � @9428 B.11 13193 ��� I� �� u III / v. ���,��, i % \- `` �`, - "-- ---- / _ / —\ — \ D , , v ' %I , '—' 7 - ---------- - \ V A \ \ \ > REVISION LOG: / 1 ; ''- ` --- \ �V A \ \ \ > A.10 5,291 B.12 2,846 REV DESCRIPTION DATE �, j 1 �� ` - - \ - �\ \ CITY REVIEW # 1 10-07-22 2 - __ "� \ \ _'� A.11 12 468 B.13 7 743 A RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #2 02-27-23 r D N D 11 y D B.1 $ A \` —J UN � o —fl D T � _— — ) ---- - 3 � II _------] \ � B RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #3 03-09-23 ---__ n \ \ \ \ \ � C RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #4 03-21-23 _- , �NI�5 A.12 6,937 B.14 4,132 _______ , , = Z 1 v v - _ — �6\�4��A.13 9,549 6.15 3,624 SHEET NAME: REGULATED SLOPES 0 0 s, T \ � -�. _" � TOTAL IMPACTED 105,026 TOTAL IMPACTED 205,262 FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT r �_ q — E— � cl � __ _ �� OVERLAY AND SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN I I __ -� TOTAL STEEP SLOPE 215,827 TOTAL CRITICAL SLOPE 403,791 PR03 CT N • PROJECT WELCHGER: SHEET NUMBER: — — — � / 1026 REVISION: ISSUED DATE: C �j ----\ —�49% PERCENT IMPACTED 51% C 03-21-2023 1 ■ 1 O '� N I , 1 , 0. i% % j'' -----`-````'` ��`♦ -- ---------- -- ---- HARVEST PRESERVE RESERVE ------- ------ FOUNDATION, INC j T HARVEST PRESERVE X -`x - x — .................. - I FOUNDATION INC , ;---------- - - - Vj ACT, I N C MONUMENT ------------- J FARMS, LLC r .•k�"ARVEST .-PRESERVE ``:\♦ ;_ 1 ; ; ; ; -'`�30--`-=_ ------ -- - % i ;' ;' _ \; i FO l�b� 5' TI O N , I N� cs % 1' ,' ;' ----------------= _---------------- -- ---- �� _ _ --- --- \ \\ I 140 -- /' .✓' ' -----_ / ' g/ / / / ^ /i' / i ' i i 1 I ; ; 1' i i /' - ` ♦ `\ i i i % ' I % i i i ' ' "'- ' %5 - `'` `\ `' ' _ ,RQ `� ` ` - /' ' ' ' / /'`_-I``-____ �i,r ` //�� ,♦- fif�: '�' iI i i'i i i " i i ; ` I� `` \ � ♦1 i i i i J � r ; i i i / J' ----------- -------' '-- ' p , ,._- --- = ; _ `-NR�,,,"Y'- -. 1' 1= / ; % i ; ' / 1 1 1 ` ♦ 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I / " ------------------- --- -- - X C.4 ---__ ' ♦ \ _ \ \ Ir 'j -- '--- ` ` 1 ' I / % 1 1 1 I . ` ' ' I 1 1 1 1 '! / I 1 I , I I , 1 ' --- ---- III. _- `'`\ `♦ ``♦♦`♦ / I 7 ` O ----------- / / ii %J ,/"AE •- _�..-_;``'i - / - / / r \ i I ' 1 r / I ; i i i ' i f� -- ` \ \ ___________ 760. ' ♦♦ ♦` \` , 1 1 \ \ J r \ \ I I _ _\ N _JI I ' �,_- __ - -`� i i iIIIIIII � \ 1 , � , / TY 0 F ; �`; '� , - _- _--- j, .� --- !; ; = ' \, i I , '.. l' I r r r ��' `� --- rrlll II -- _ _. :Y`-� �� =- ' 4 it-: ' i _ - --- ----�_ _ '1 � /_-% � ' _ -� __----- � ;'' - ___ --�-- ----_ ---\\ ,, -- _`_ --- --_ � ' WL . `i\' n�' __ � ' IIII � \ 1 \` \ \ 1 , I , (O ; , ' / X --- --_ - •\ \ \\ ` `\ \ \ 1 MONUMENT -�- WLIII �`\ , 1 , , I I 1 ' � I I I 1 ♦ �♦ \ \ \ \\ 1 ' I \ 'i III ``\ `♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ \ \ __ / \ I 1 1 x _ \ \ • - - - - ---- ` " I - r' \ % ; / / , , - ' I I I , 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 , --- - -- ` \ , 1 , I , ` `\ I \ 1 \ \ ; ' 1 FARMS, L L C _-- 1 I 1 I - ♦ 1 \ \ \ \ ' I , � I 1 \ ' n / I - I 1 \ 1 1 - / / 1 1 V - I 1 I / 1 ' 1 1 I 1 % ♦ I 1 i �y/' , , ,O/,i , , ' , '� , /- : . _ � , 1 I , 1 , I , , I , I I ,k _ _-�_- ♦ \ \ \ I I I \ \ - 1 \ 1 \ \ 1 1 ' ' ' ' .' ' i ' i i ' ; I I ' I I I I I I I 1 ; � , ♦ \ \` \` \ , , , 1 1 1 I I \ \ I I '' \ � 1 \ \ \ ` 1 O i _ / -- x \ � j � ' I _--- -'- - __ -- / ` 1 1 1 I ' ' 1 ' I I 1 � I , - 1 1 1 `_�� 1 1 1 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 \ 1 1 1 I / I / I I / 1 1 1 I 1 -\ I 1 _ - , � 1 , \I % / 1 I 1 I I I I 1 \ I \` \ \ \ 1` 1 ; ;; ;;; \ \ I 1 ' 1 ``\` ` `♦ `� I 1 1 ` , 1 \ ' '1 I 1 , '\ \ 1 , `� �' � `♦ ♦\ ' > i \ '1 \ � 1 ' ' ' % 1 ; 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 X 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ � \ ♦ I , , \ \ ' \ , 1 1 '1 , ---`_ -- _-_- .-� - � 1 �; \ I \ / ` % ; / • ' ;' ``♦ `---' I I 1 I I ; I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I ; `, `, \ `, \ ` ` \ \ \, , I ; 1 I --- `, ♦ \♦ . \ ' `\ \ \ `, `, 1 `;\ `, \ ` ', ' I 1 1 1 - --- 1 ; `� . . I I I 1 1 1 I XI \ \ \ \ \ \ ,\, 1 1 I I'I ; ` `'♦ `♦♦`` ` ♦,; \` ` \ ` ♦`` ' ` 1' ' ' ' / 1 1�1 --'--'� - -= ' i ; ', i-----`_�` -- \ \` \` ♦♦ .. '\ `, C.1 ,,` � ,. ; , `\ `, ; I � ; ; , , I 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 � \ , \ \ \ 1 I I I 1 '� -- '`:: ` 1 , ♦ ` \ , \ '` \ 1 I \` --'--- - : �\, III 1 ``\♦` \ ;` \` 1\ � < `\, ` ` ; ; 1 1 ; 1 1 � � I I I I 1 \, `, `, `, `, `, ; ; 1 1 1 ; 1 i I ; / \, ; ♦, \ ♦1�\ \ \ \,` ,` \\ \ , . ';' ; \ ` `: � ' '` ' �II L \ \ ` -- I I 1 1 1 1 1 '1 '1 \ \ \ I I I ; ; " i 1 1 tl 1 / I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ I I '` 1 1 1 i i i ' ' 1 1 iiil i ♦\ \\\I" ,II'"' \\ ' ' \ \ 1 1 1 1 \ 1 ' 1 ' \ 1 1 ♦ \ \ I I ; I I I ; 1. \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 I 1 , I , A 1 A ♦` � 1 1 ------------ `` 1 1 , ; ,X \ ` II III `\`, `.�. \\\\ \ , 1 , ; ,\; ,u.mn'♦' --'' �Illlllll \ 1 1 \ 1 -- -- -------------------- \` '``"' i f``♦ `. .� \ `` - - ``' \``♦\ `\ \ \ `\ \ `\ \ \ - - -' c 1 _ p \`\ 1 1 1 1 I 1' '' 1 1 1 I ' 1 I ` ' i " I`` �``♦ `\ \`\` I ; r �\ 1 1 1 1 ', \ \\ i \` � ♦♦ ``\ _ � � - `` \ _ --� C.8 ' � `\ \ `\ `\ `\ `\ `\ `\ \\ ``\ \ I ♦`♦ }} ♦ - ```I 1 ' '1'1 I � ' , I I ' I 1 I \1 '1 i , / `` `` `. ; `` �.` I 11 ' \ \ ;` 1 ,1 1 1 '1 ` 1\ ' \ ------------- `\ / f `• • `` r llllll (IIIIIII ` ` `` `♦ i i i ' ' i i I 1 ,1 I 1 ; __'-- ` ♦ ` ♦` ` _ �,` `., ``,` -`. III IN 1 !' `, ;♦ `, `\♦ `,\ `\` `\; \` \ \ ; ``, ', \` \,` ``,` `,` ` ``.� `. ♦` `' I I I I � ' ' ; I I I I ; , r' ``; ♦, ., .,` `` _ 1 ; 1, `, 1 \ \ , 1 1 I ; _________-%\`` �' ♦` ♦ \ ��`` \ I ; I 'i /. � `\` `` \`` \\ ; '` `,` `\ �\\ ``♦`\ `\ I ♦`\7` `\ `♦ ♦♦ ♦ 1 I 1 I 1 1 ' III / ' . 1 1 i I `\ \ i i � \ 1 1 \ I / r \ , / , I 1 ` ♦ ' 1 1.---:� .` ♦ 1 I 1 1 , 1 , I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 ------------------- ` i i j , 1` , `♦ � -`^` Y.� I 1 1 ` ```♦ \ ' 1 ' \ 1 1 1 I ♦` 1 1 1 . 1 \ 1 __- -T1 / , ♦ , \ ` -`-- `"` I / ' % 1 I 1 �♦ `♦ ♦ \ � \ , 1 � \ \�-- - �`\`\ ` \ , 1 , 1 , I 1 1 � I 1 \ � I I ' 1 1 1 1 ___---_- -_- ♦ ``♦ -- - I / ; ` \ ``♦ `♦ % % f 1 1 � ` `` ` ��``` ` \ ` \ \ \ `- - ♦ \ ` \ 1 -_- 1 I I I I % --__ 11 I 1 1 1 '.1 (Y C7 ` \ ------ --_- __-_'- X / I \ ` 1 - _ x ``�� / , I 1 l \`♦ �( ` III `` ♦\ ` ` ` `` -` ` `` `` ` `` ' ' -- / , ; ; , ; , � , I 1 I I 1 , ` /``�� ; I / \ \ , \♦\ ♦\ ♦♦� `♦`` III ``'``, `` `\ ` `\ \ \ \ 1 1 1 / __l I 1 I 1 1 --- _ ,`\ \ __-___-_- / \ `l \ 1 \ I `♦\ \\ `-`-_\ `\\ \\\\ \ \ 1 ; `V; ; 1 ; 1 ; I I 1 i 1 1 j 1 r ` I 1 1 1 _ I \ ----- ------ ` ` ` ` ` = --- --- --- \ \ . ---- '``Y 1 1 1 '`♦ `, `\ , \ `\ \ ` ` `. ` I I 1 ' -� ' / ; % ' ; ; 1 / ; ' ; I I - 1 1 ---'_ _--- `_-----� \ \ \`\ \ --�_ \ \I 1 1 ♦ \ \ ` ` \ \ \ \ \ \ I I r - " / / / ' I / i ' / / / 1 1 I I 1 1 t7TLl \---__- \ \\`♦ ♦\ \ _- ----__ --_--' `�X 1 1� i S 1 `\ \ ` _ - ` III \ \1 1 - ♦ 1 \ \\\\ \ \\ \ - - .� \ 1 \ __ -___ y , `♦ - `' C.10 III - -- `\ ♦ , � / --- I{. ,1'\ -- I', \ \ `\ \ 1 � � \` ``I ; 1 1 `, \ `, `\ C.5 I I I ; 1 1 ; ; � ,♦ , ,, I I ------------ © / - h ------------- �. � __ �'�``----- t tLEGEND: WOODLANDS kill ------------- \♦ � ; �----- .\ `♦ ; IIII - � � __ ` `\, __- - - � I i` \ \ ; \ ,''♦ _ __ \ , ;\, \ \ \, ; _ `I �- - - '`> � '`♦ / `♦``. ' - - �� � ♦ ` IIII � ,,\ \\\\;\ .;♦, ;III � '' � ' ;' o 1 / � ♦ � ��� �� � � �� -- � - -__ � , p, 1 \\ .`,♦ I , I , 1 1 ;' - 1 � DEVELOPMENT RELATED: PRESERVED WOODLAND M I 1 I \ ` \ I i \ _ ` IIII. ``./G - `� 7 �r `-1 ``�` - i i ♦``\ `` ♦`, ♦ � \ ; '`♦\ `♦♦ `�`` ``+ I I I � � � � � i ' j ' ' �-�`` �� i `' I '\ ; ' .-. 5) � 1 ` \\ / ' ``- ^`V� I,%,, . I =¶` J'I• x \ ; ` \ `I ` ; �'♦, , I 1 ;' ; / ; I / V' - BUFFERED WOODLAND (50 ) ```♦` \ ` ♦`, 1 \ / ' / 1 ;'�' , = �L`` �:\`- -- ` yy I� `'♦ l��Il(�fIq(MIyI�'I\ ; 1 , ; ; ; ;'; 1 / ; %' ,-, t) IMPACTED WOODLAND CA/ 1 C.1 O � i D �.. I ..T.. -- T `_______ ---7 /1 i i i i i / i i i / �IIIIP°°' X_ `` -'— �-_ �`♦ `\ `\`\ �� \ \ -___' ` ' i .--------------------- ,III HIM 1 / r IMPACTED WOODLANDS vv�'`♦ -�t, `,� A, --- \ DEVELOPMENT -RELATED IMPACTS �' `; `v ` / `� `` ' � , ♦ VAAA � I ,,.� ; �' i - A LOCATION AREA (SF) 230,671 12,735 13,217 l� 81,293 r r \ _ 1 = I 7.-A @ 8 KK - -- _ = _ C620,687 36,850 52,066 80,800 5,543 IMPACTED AREA 608,471 34.7% Nc II BUFFER AREA 266,365 15.2% ' \I Q \ \ \ \ TOTAL EXISTING AREA 1,754,016 \ / PERCENT RETAINED 50.1% PER IOWA CITY CODE, RS-5 ZONE MUST RETAIN AT LEAST / 50% WOODLANDS. WOODLANDS WITHIN THE BUFFER r AREAS DO NOT COUNTTOWARDS RETENTION VALUES. -..-.. CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY ENGINEER: Q H 0 50 100 150 200 WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEET 1" = 100' we c design+development CLIENT: MONUMENT HILLS, LLC PROJECT NAME: MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY, IOWA REVISION LOG: REV DESCRIPTION DATE - CITY REVIEW # 1 10-07-22 A RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #2 02-27-23 B RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #3 03-09-23 C RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #4 03-21-23 SHEET NAME: WOODLANDS FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AND SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN PROJECT NO: PROJECT MANAGER: SHEET NUMBER: 1026 WELCH REVISION: ISSUED DATE: C1.20 C 03-21-2023 04 N 04 Ld a 0 HARVEST PRESERVE T FOUNDATION, INC HARVEST PRESERVE d 7 FOUNDATION, INC ... ... ... ... ... ... .. . .. ... ... . .. . .. ------- ------- --------------- pv, ACT, INC .720- --------------- u, / / ,,, � -_ ... ... ... ... . . ... -x MONUMENT 7771 - -- -- ----- - K FJ . ... ... .. "t J ----74o %%' ------- - FARMS, LLC . .. ... ... ... .. 73 ........ ..... - ---- A. 13 ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. A 12 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... > ------------- x , , '. 11 '\ \> 140 . .. . . . . ...... .... ... .... 7 ------------- % B.13 . .... . .. . ..... . . ... . . ... ... .. ... ... ... ... . 7 ... ... ... ... .. .......... . b 1Z 0\ . . . ............. -710 .. ... . ... ------- ...... . .... ... ... --------------------- ... ... . . ... . ... 760 ... ... ... ... ... .. WL \ , I % ... ... ... . 0 �, \ %% � , I , ", ", % % - ------ ------ ----- ----------- I j/ C -0 -r 4 . ... .... ... ... ... ... IOWA CITY r I I ............ '%j ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ......... MONUMENT WL FARMS, LLC % >1 . . ....... . .... I ... ....... co % 1% 0 HARVEST PREH VE j- 6' 3 FOUN INC ----------------- CP.... ........ c� ---------- - .... ....... C? . . ... ... .. \ Li . .. ... . .. .. ............ ; f . .. ... . .. ... 0" ... . .. ... ... ---------- . ... . %\ !'(B 11 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... . .. . .. . .. ... ... ... ... . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. c ------ LEGEND: REGULATED SLOPES ... ... ... ... ... ... .. % ---------------- ---------------------- \% A.10 % ... ... ... ... .. STEEP SLOPE (18%-25%) . ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... .. % '%% ... .. .. . ........ .. ......... . . %\ --7 ------- % STEEP SLOPE - IMPACTED B 9 -------------------------- B 8 ----- ----- ... ... ... .. r% -, ,, /, \ 1'1�� ... . .. ... . .. .. ... ... ... I. ... ... ... ------ ---------- -FICAL SLOPE (25%-40%) CRr . . ... ... .. A.8 ... ... ... ... .. ... . .. . .. . .. . .. ... UA9 11L WL -FICAL SLOPE - IMPACTED f C) E R. CRr ... ... . .. . .. . .. ... x %%\\ 7 HILLS ... ... ... ... ... X % PROTECTED SLOPE (>40%) 0 N DQNJN- ... ....... .. .. Ad 10 ... .. ... . 0 TED SLOPE - BUFFER PROTEC ... ... ... ... . . ... ... . -- ------- ---- % ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. .. . ... ... ... .. 7777. ---------- k1l", "I I , 1, %, � , , 1% . . ........ % % 77 ..... ......... ----------- --------------------- -7 --- -------------- % % If I - - I I I . . .. .. . UB7, %! CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS -- -- ---------------- At --777 .. ... ... ... . .. 16 ... ... .. ... .. DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY % %. .. .... ... . 13.4 . .. ........ ....... - ---------------------- NOTE: . . . ... ... .. THERE ARE NO PROTECTED SLOPES WITHIN -77Z"' i r 7- -------------------- ... ... ... ... - I - I "I I , 1 11 -------- ... ... ... ... ... .. . .. ... . .. -7 A.4 THE DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY . .. ... ... ..... (D 4< 9L ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. c)) .... .. . ... REFER TO SHEET C2.00 FOR GRADING PLAN Im �\% 1, -, , , ... ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... \ % ----------- A.3 A . ... ... ... . . .... ... . -6 .. ... ... .. B ... ... ... . % IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPES: ... ... ... . ... ... ... ... ... ... . .... . . .. . .. . .. ... ... LOCATION AREA (SF) 780 ------ ------------ ....... .. .. .. ............. .................. .. .. ... ... ... LV LOCATION AREA (SF) 7,791 1 -------- TED STEEP SLOPES: 10,349 IMPAC 0 50 100 150 200 T WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEE . . ... ... ... 0 N 100' INEER: 1,069 23,809 A'4 8 ENG - ----------- 7,018 15,342 ---------- .. ... ... .. 4,274 9,769 % % % �P, B.3 % 3,275 21,592 /0 ----- w e c -P, �j --7 ... ... ... . .. 78 -77 �j > ... ... ... ... .. CLIENT: A �A 13 2,538 8,001 design +development 13,122 46,010 MONUMENT HILLS, LLC PR03EC-F NAME: �j 24,467 19,596 ... ... ... ... .. .. - -- ------- B.2 \% L) < 5,536 11,465 ... ... .... MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY IOWA 9,428 13,193 D REVISION LOG: ---------------- 5,291 2,846 REV DESCRIPTION DATE CITY REVIEW #1 10-07-22 .c A RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #2 02-27-23 12,468 7,743 B RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #3 -21-23 C RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #4 03 B I 6,937 4,132 -A A.1 SHEET NAME: 0 9,549 3,624 REGULATED SLOPES n FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 7- 105,026 205,262 OVERLAY AND SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN TOTAL STEEP SLOPE 215,827 TOTAL CRITICAL SLOPE 403,791 PR03EC-F NO: PR03EC-F MANAGER: SHEET NUMBER: 1026 WELCH 3- -T -T T REVISION: ISSUED DATE: 49% 51% c 03-21-2023 F cl . 10 a 00 M N O N N M O N MEN • • • . - ------ G -.::Il ee...........E..e...ee: .I. ..., I"N .I.'I ..M .... ..• �_.,.:::.........,..........::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: • . • -::::: C..11111111:1:11 - ...;_GL::••1:L.11�� Y�::::::::::::::1:::1:::1:::1:�:1: L:lia■�iN1::1:::1:::1:::1:::1::\. • 1) . • 1) • • • 1) ::1.':.111111111111I1.11::.E11II.111•11111.111111:11111111111111111111111:\. • ..' I•o111 ' I; Ii......:::::::i::::i ::::::::::::::::::::.. .........::::::::::::ii : • • • • • e.. • (,y/Iy}••.a�1•ra11:::::i:::Ie1 ! is:::::� ���::::::::::::::::::'.:::::::::::::::::::::::::\. 1 r •"r� - - 1 1 • �•.IIN.S....."..S 11I9.. 1............... 1:11111111111111:1111:'111111111111111111111111: .E...., .I .I...H.".., .I .I..., .I .I..I.'..^;iS�C11153OEr11111111:::1:::1:•c1.n. ��;::1:::1:::1:::1:::1:.0 �::1:::1:::1:::1:::1::8: • • .. .. .. C]\1I.111111.SI111:11:19:11111G1111111.. `\I''1111111:::::::::::::1..I ........................... —.��\::11:II:�A1::11:::11111.•1e1:::1.•11:1:.%, , • 1) 1) ` • / \ N�� �I]\'.5111111........11:::11I1.I1I.1I111111. 11:::::::::::::::::::5E11:..................::111I:.. �.� ... ® w::.....:::::g1 :::::::::::::::::::::r.::..........................-........ I�•.�:11111\eLi30111:11Y11C\•1: p::111111111111111111111111:1111111111111111111......... ..... .. :::•r1:ii1.°' :1, :: 1"'.i:::::::::::::::::::::::::.....::::::::::::i.. : • • : • 1 ��� ■ I ■ �� • D ■ ".�:1 1:111.1\� - 1"11�111111:::::::::1:.............11111... 11... 1111111I: . . . .. . ■ i rl■.. • 11111111•.1.111::::::11::.........:11111m...........::::\. � :.11:: ::. 'e1.11�11111. I11...:............I.N ........... ....1 � .: �ooaao.•.. mo.o .... • .-w. . OMNI r 9 / 1.111 :1�1111 ..................... •� n•:um.u...c..Y.•i..................................:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::::::::.. t I • • • • - • .. .. . • �� ® _ „ . .. ::::::::::::::::::::� ri:::::::::1::::::::ii':::......::::::::n.n_ onononononononn • • f • �• n.'n::1:".: 1::::::::::::::::::::::n•u.onnono.uononen.onono•••.. ... ,•::::::::::::::::11: A�11 • : • I �� .:1::ri1:•u1. :I:: ::::::::::::::::::::1:::::.1..:.::::::..................:•oi::::::��:::::1 11111111111111111111111111111111v::W1� 1••��1111:::::::Ii.1:::::::::::::::::::::•c::1::.:::::::1n:::1:::1:::::ra,>ii::•.i::1::1: `•iI:1::::i1:ri:i::1:1 i1::a:::::::::::::::::::::I::I::I::i.:1i" %eno.n•...yur.u.c:%uo .00000000000.om..ouoa.c uoocoo\•ouuuuuu.o...uaaoo.0000.uoouoo • \. mn.m....r.....u. ononononmor•o1...e ononon....... .Yu1 • , • 'i•.:1:111'in:1:1:: r•:::::::::::::::::.•o::1:ri:::.:::;1:::11:::::::co::o1:1:1:•Y ::•u::::"ui. , i'.:: u.• ou� - N1:�:"u::::"n:1 •••::::::::::::iia:::1::1i •e::n.1.,�I::Ioa:::i::1:::.. .Y w i: %"■� • 1:::::::::::%ia�.::1::�0. ::n.:.••�uom � locaooY.ou.noo..1. • •• �. .i1.. ... •::::n ' •1:.1::1. •an.:i�iniL:l:i:;:.y�w,"'"n • e�� C� •1 :1 H ' --::•e1:::. .:.i.•�..is ,':::::1::. •'1•iar 'I':il:i:'1%■� . �11111i•111511:1'11:I11:1111111111:1N111: •11111111: • • �(♦ • s _ v . i • /� / , � \� Rag. .eer�1:::::II:::. �:::•. � � • 1 IN ::•cl:.._ 1c:1............: �'��:'a.1a•,:::1::::ri::::::: :::: r• .............. 1 1 .;,.. - ........ • . . • ................... • 11 1111111111111111111� III .... .......... 1111111111111111111 1 / � � � � �'\.1I111:1111I511:15�' � � • • :::::::::::' 11P11111�17.a.: 1 ..1■■■■■.11 I� -t I I II 2222222222222222222E -------------------- -• I D I II I� I � III I r ............................. j � ��� ___ - __ �•1 � 1111111F1111111111111IR11111� - _ � 111� _@w�:1111� ..:11:1::1M: / I..�YGi�rl.111■ IY.::1[ w.R'] YO. r.:111I:1•••� \ 11111I1111.1111 .I[..G.11111::I:11111 .11 ....... ��� ��� � ::::�::::n';.iiia ♦ ..'u::: 1::1:n r�1::::1 �:�'•c1::i1::::nc�:::::1..::::::::::.:•a:::::.::::::. s • 1..... ...�. r...:::::: ,...y..:::2r ..... 1'1.................... _ _ . IN 77 _ '::::..;.I:i1•n.:III:11iih::::::::::ri11•.•a•'�I::::�•e'ss.ai:i: - IN ON ® i '.. r•:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I�:::::::::::::::::: .a •� • ' • ...................... �•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::iil'::::::::::::::::::::::::1•ees:1:::::::::.n eesaa1•e:.iiiii:::'-,� m000000000000000000000000u.......... .............00... e • • ...:...............................................�_.............. _....:......... IN IN. IN IN a �•%.:7iiiii •::::ao:onoi. II••••n::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: r'i:::::::::::::n ..;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::............111111111rY:111I1 /O ............»,YOVA111111 .:... �•1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.'1 111111111 .. . _ • • • • IN 11 , �a1111.::::::::: �� ���:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::rii.:o::1n :i::: Z2 1:.................::::::::: rr•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.................I ::::c::r;�: .00000000uuuu ...... 00000000000000000000i.u.m... o oco I. _ • .............................. ..................................................,,..n....1,... • • : • 1 _::::::::::::::::::::::::::.1. :::: __ ::::::::::::::::::::n::1::1ii 1::1: ....................... ::::::'•� ::::■::.: ::::::ENII lin 10 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::a r•-..•......i l i:.n::n::1:: i • 1 • . 1 • . • . 1 111111111111111111111111111I::1111111 111111111111::::::::::::......::1111111m11J111111111 :..................::::::::::::::::::::::::............:::::II::�:h::::1: � ..•11:::::::::::::::::::1111111111C.111111111::::::::::::......::1111111:15111:�11111 J • ••.::1:::1:::1:::1:::1:::1:::1:::1 :I:::I:::I:::I:::I:::I:::I:I:1 • Iva I• w 1 ■ i] a I•.11I111:::::::::::::::::11111111111. w71111111 ..................:1111111n"....1 1 \� ::1::I:::1:::1:::1:::1:::1:::1:::1::: 1::..................:::I:::I;.: 11.. °I.91.111111111111111111111111111111:11\ • 11111111111111111111111111111.11 '111a ME .............................\ .............................. •111111111111111111111111111111,�C1..................11111111{R 111:I::111111111111111111::::::11111111111F.:._..:1111111111111111111111111II::1111 - .II�111I....ISE11:1I1:114::.:11111111111111111111111117..111111111111111111111111111111111"� •."11I:S��F1 .��11e�•r U`11.................::1.11.1 eee::..........1......:1111. I , 1 _-- _ ® ..,,...............................n......... '.....e........................,.......�� • , 1 : 11 : 11 .; a ����• .`� ; • � - ■1j 11I ........ .... �� �� •• 1 1 • 1 1 � 111111.I:: ME r � IN ME 1 ` f i • - 1 ...r. ININ •„ .. • . ■1 1 �� .. 1 S3.............. .� ice' —� , • 1 ............ [.». ......... �..... . � � ' • ' "1:111IIE11111111. 1::1111:13="• ¢���=s ��,•,� ® ■ • , � , • ' . ' : ' 1 1 • • . 1 � : . � , • � , 1 • iii aw IN IN WIN rim ;W-2�' PIMA Wililillill '' • • • �•• 1 • ■ • ■pill 1 1 HARVEST PRESERVE FOUNDATION, INC HARVEST PRES-ERVE 3 FOUN A- rON, INC ' -- j � H X.1 X.2 Wit®®ems �w4 � /��w< __,-___--- "________- - 3- i ROCHESTER -----HILLS CONDOMINIUM 3 OF CITY" 71 �I ROCHES-T- R CD 1------------ HILLS n1 CONDOMINIUM a 00 N 00 M N N N 04 0 w Y.1 V. "A --- -------------------- ------------------------ ---------------- , ---------------- ------ I 1MO HARVEST PRESERVE FOUNDATION, INC HAR, FO Y.2 I ; I 1 I I I 1 1 \ I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 11 1 i REGULATED SLOPES 1 —_--- — "-- HARV'FST PRESERVE FO-UJNDATION, INC ---------------- ------------------- -------------- 1 -- I I , ------ - IIE Sfi__PR15 S E RV y! I - J-N-DATIGN-; --- NC- / / --------------- --, -- -- --------- / / I , \ `'IN , \, , 'I I I IN I 11 IN IN II f I 1 I I 1N IN NN , II 1 1 1 1 Q I 1 I 1 1 ` / 1 1 — I 1 1 \I III I _ y 1 I -------------- -------------- ' --- --------- --- --------------------- --r--- ; --a�M--"'------- ------- 1 I HARV'FST PRESERVE i FO-UJNDATION; INC r' / - ----------------- ----------------- J i r ---------------- - - -_--- ?20----- f4A- VESfi-- R S E RV i l --- - - --- -F�U--Nti}AT10N-;---FBI-C' T I -- ----------- --------------------------- --- - - I ' IN 730 _ ------------ 1 -`--------------------- aka ;'------------------- --- -- ` , ! i ----- .a140 ; ----- , ' i El vvV IN 1111 III IIIIIN IN I — -- ---- ' \ IN III • �,� '�1 I\I 1 , , I ' I � - -- - — -- , 1 1 I _•, 1 � 1 1 — I ; / I ----- , y I i, r' ---------------- IN ---- _ --- --- _ _ __ ------------------- --- I WETLANDS IMPACTED STEEP SLOPES: IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPES: IMPACTED PROTECTED SLOPES: LOCATION AREA (SF) LOCATION AREA (SF) LOCATION AREA (SF) V.1 2,471 W.1 4,120 X.1 1,928 V.2 241 X.2 6,009 TOTAL IMPACTED 2,712 TOTAL IMPACTED 4,120 TOTAL IMPACTED 7,937 TOTAL STEEP SLOPE 20,773 TOTAL CRITICAL SLOPE 10,411 TOTAL CRITICAL SLOPE 16,898 PERCENT IMPACTED 13% PERCENT IMPACTED 40% PERCENT IMPACTED 47% ALL IMPACTS TO THE PROTECTED SLOPES RESULT FROM ACTIVITIES ALLOWED BY IOWA CITY CODE(PUBLIC TRAIL, BRIDGE CROSSING, AND SANITARY SEWER) PER CODE 14-51-2D LEGEND: WETLANDS WELTLAND BOUNDARY — WL — WETLAND AREA WETLAND BUFFER (100') WETLAND FILL WETLAND IMPACTS LOCATION AREA (SF) S 3,314 Y.2 4,337 8 2,513 TOTAL IMPACTS (SF) 10,164 LEGEND: REGULATED SLOPES STEEP SLOPE (18%-25%) STEEP SLOPE - IMPACTED CRITICAL SLOPE (25%-40%) CRITICAL SLOPE - IMPACTED PROTECTED SLOPE(>40%) PROTECED SLOPE - IMPACTED PROTECTED SLOPE - BUFFER CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS ---- DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY ENGINEER: 0 30 60 90 120 WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEET 111 = 601 we c design+development CLIENT: MONUMENT HILLS, LLC PRO3ECT NAME: MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY, IOWA REVISION LOG: REV DESCRIPTION DATE - CITY REVIEW # 1 10-07-22 A RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #2 02-27-23 GENERAL NOTES: B RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW#3 03-09-23 C RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #4 03-21-23 ALL IMPACTS TO REGULATED SENSITIVE FEATURES SHOWN ON OUTLOT E AND OUTLOT F ARE FOR USES SHEET NAME: AND ACTIVITIES ALLOWED WITHIN PROTECTED OUTLOT E & F: SLOPES AND WETLAND BUFFERS PER IOWA CITY CODE 14-5I-2D: FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1. PARKLAND, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, AND TRAILS OVERLAY AND SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN 2. STREAM CROSSINGS PR03ECT NO: PR03ECT MANAGER: SHEET NUMBER: 3. ESSENTIAL PUBLIC UTILITIES (SANITARY SEWER) 1026 WELCH REVISION: ISSUED DATE: C2.00 C 03-21-2023 a N co M N N N N M 0 0 OF CITY" � (s cS> ROCHESTf=R ---------- Fl 1 LLS CONDOMINIUM HARVEST PRESERVE FOUNDATION, INC HARVEST PRESERVE FOUNDA— rON, INC 4♦ / ♦4♦ "000-0o 00, ♦ ��� I♦ �� p - _ __ -- ♦ / - - -- - --' ' -----_,00 -- ----- -- -- - -x- ✓= - _ --- ---- 0000 IN IN -_ -- -.-----yX*--- 1, IN,------ IN IN _--------- -" ---- i �i r , WOODLANDS HARV'FST PRESERVE FO-UJNDATION, INC i' "''�Illllo11l10 'T IN IN r' ---- _ IN IN k/ ; NINNIN 1 ' IN II IN l IN ' i NNNN "N IN — ; IN y , - - - - - - - I --- ----------- / --------- --- - - - - -------------- -- --- ; --' ' ----- -- - ------ /---__--- - - - ----------- - -- _ -_--__ , IMPACTED WOODLANDS LOCATION Z.1 AREA (SF) 18,082 IMPACTED AREA 18,082 BUFFER AREA 11,959 TOTAL EXISTING AREA 71,108 PERCENT REATAINED 58% LEGEND: WOODLANDS DEVELOPMENT RELATED: PRESERVED WOODLAND BUFFERED WOODLAND (50') IMPACTED WOODLAND CONSTRUCTION AREA LIMITS ---� DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY ENGINEER: H 0 30 60 90 120 WHEN PRINTED ON 22"x34" SHEET 1" = 60' L) we c J Z design+development J ' it n CLIENT: 01 MONUMENT HILLS, LLC Z 0 PR03ECT NAME: J MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY, IOWA N D N REVISION LOG: o+ REV DESCRIPTION DATE - CITY REVIEW # 1 10-07-22 3- A RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #2 02-27-23 GENERAL NOTES: B RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW#3 03-09-23 C RESPOND TO CITY REVIEW #4 03-21-23 ALL IMPACTS TO REGULATED SENSITIVE FEATURES SHOWN ON OUTLOT E AND OUTLOT F ARE FOR USES SHEET NAME: AND ACTIVITIES ALLOWED WITHIN PROTECTED OUTLOT E & F: WOODLANDS BUFFERS PER IOWA CITY CODE 14-5I-2D: FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT s 1. PARKLAND, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, AND TRAILS OVERLAY AND SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN i 2. STREAM CROSSINGS PR03ECT NO: PR03ECT MANAGER: SHEET NUMBER: 3. ESSENTIAL PUBLIC UTILITIES (SANITARY SEWER) 1026 WELCH REVISION: ISSUED DATE: i i C 03-21-2023 C2. 10 ATTACHMENT 5 Approved Final Plat Page 1 of 3 AREA BREAKDOWN BY QUARTER: FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY --TrNA NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SECTION 12+79-6 39.43 ACRES SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SECTION 12 79 6 8.98 ACRES !,o NE CORNER OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 !�__._NE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SECTION 12-79-6 23.52 ACRES4��0NW CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 MONUM T HILLS FOUND 5/$ REBAR YPC BROKEN SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 SECTION 12-79-6 0.24 ACRES � $ Doc ICI: 032076970003 Type: PLA Kind: PLAT NW CORNER AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2022024 TOTAL 72.17 ACRES Recorded fl.004/2023 at 11:21:52 AM FOUND CONCRETE Q � , �.3� � -- _— _�_. _�-`-------}.�_._ � --._ __ - \ Fee Amt: �7.0o Pane i of .� MONUMENT ���' CIT l j ��� ° ' '� Johnson County rowa N87 42 14 E 1 54 NW CORNER AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2022066 Kim Painter County Recorde�� nriniTr+vEct)n rGi wnnn�a f FDUND3/4" PIPEOPC#19$28 , BK�� P�267-269 rC%if RECORDER'S INDEX COUNTY: JOHNSON o SECTION: 12-T79N-R06W 4 QUARTER SECTION: NE 1/4 - CITY: IOWA CITY „h SUBDIVISION: MONUMENT HILLS --- BLOCK: N/A _.. 0 O LOT(S): N/A U O 0 PROPRIETOR: MONUMENT FARMS LLC REQUESTED BY: MONUMENT FARMS LLC 0 X AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC, 60 E. Court St. Unit 3 ¢ PREPARED BY: Iowa City, IA 52240 - PH# 319.519.6220 W z z z w LOCATION LOCATION MAP - NOT TO SCALE _ PLAT PREPARED BY: OWNERS: � AXIOM CONSULTANTS MONUMENT FARMS, LLC 60 E. COURT STREET, UNIT 3 3810 PETER50N PL IOWA CITY, [A 52240 NORTH LIBERTY, IA 52317 SUBDIVIDER'S ATTORNEY: HARVEST PRESERVE PHELAN TUCKER LAW LLP FOUNDATION, INC JOHN BEASLEY 3402 ROCHESTER AVE 321 E. MARKET STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52245 IOWA CITY, IA 52245 SUBDIVIDER: MONUMENT HILLS, LLC 221 E. BURLINGTON STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 UTILITY APPROVALS LUM N DATE 1,2 D- [Mt;NltOMMUNICATIONS DATE MEtFRdNET DATE -�. 11W 7-- 2 3 MEDIACOM DATE "il, 1/� // _23 DAMERICAN EONERGY DATE NOTES: \ �7 ' _ _ _- - �� -- _- 1. NOTES ON THIS PLAT ARE NOT INTENDED TO CREATE ANY VESTED PRIVATE \ INTEREST IN ANY STATED USE RESTRICTION OR COVENANT OR CREATE ANY q _ _ -- J �1U. `. (��� r 2 OUTLOTS: THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES TO ANY NOTED USE RESTRICTION OR COVENANT. � UT�OT_i NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 - - _ _ -_� � __ m �0.34AC SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 ` -' ,- --" A i 6 1 s M� _ 1. �y � LLJ LCC I % �; a _ OUTLOT SIZE (SF) INTENDED USE A 877,373 MAINTAINED BY HOA. CONSERVATION EASEMENT AS SHOWN. B 332,843 MAINTAINED BY HOA. CONSERVATION EASEMENTAS SHOWN. C 285,496 MAINTAINED BY HOA. CONSERVATION EASEMENT AS SHOWN. D 150 MAILBOX CLUSTER. E 67,730 DEDICATED TO THE CITY FOR OPEN SPACE PER CODE 14-5K-3. F 78,731 TO BE CONVEYED TO HARVEST PRESERVE, INC. CONSERVATION EASEMENT AS SHOWN. p,1 3 �� PARCEL A 114,537 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR ROCHESTER AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS. C] z 569 = ��° . ' � 0© I KEY NOTES; 20' ACCESS EASEMENT PARCEL B 238,562 RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED TO CITY FOR HERON DRIVE, HERON PLACE, Q z _ - + �p� 4 ��© 1 AND ALLISON WAY. u- Z 33 ° Q3 1 °®� o Q�`� �� 15' UTILITY EASEMENT Q 50' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT B C AND D ARE TO BE MAINTAINED AND OWNED BY HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION (HOA). oc m o , �� —l`!� 5��$.�?� �(�}�� (BK 5971 PG 298-302) OUTLOTS A, , w 575 56 20 Wr�-IQ s AREAS WITHIN THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA. x U_ 80.62r S59 o 1139E ", 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT � © 0 47.55' �� _ - Q CONSERVATION EASEMENT C z 2Q �a - ~ A , - ' C 1 1 © STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT ►++r>>���� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS LAND SURVEYING DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED AND THE RELATED SURVEY LU �5 !t EXISTING CONSERVATION EASEMENT BK 3237, PG 210 ����� L �{� WORK WAS PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT PERSONAL SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY _``�p� 25' STORM SEWER EASEMENT O ( ) 4 �i� LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF IOWA, APPROVED BY THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA 0CA�7 573 O Lf Cl rrr► CITY CL R D.ATE Q MAILBOX CLUSTER. REFER TO OUTLOT D DETAIL (]E 10' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT O EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT FROM = '�L ' BRADLEY +G�, = R. GEATER ; O ` •' 19828 — BRADLEY R. GEATER, P.L.S., P.E. DATE 15 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT CELL TOWER SITE PLAN BLD10-00134 '•., •s,•�#�' LICENSE NUMBER 19829. • MY LICENSE RENEWAL DATE IS DECEMBER 31, 2023. Q 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT N 25' TRAIL EASEMENT O '�,,+,• OW`P ,��1l11Iii1i{ PAGES OR SHEETS COVERED BYTHIS SEAL: 0 50 100 cv ry m rn Rt3 0 0 0 0 F. rV N N N 00 Q N 1� cV r 9 r f !V rr N H H Q C V) LU 0 3 3 3 t-'- Z 0 a a a a > > > > 0 Q Uj 'LU M_ ,j II© IIw Illy I- Z W O .J W W 0 V) J J_ Q I— Q z �= w cW G F U _ z Z a J O LU LLJ Q o o� CL W _... L, LU a n 6i _I p z G L O W u.. 0 fV (,n a 1OF3 - 1L:�)1)P i Page 2 of 3 ice, . � P AUi MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY, IOWA LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING ALL OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 200033 IN BOOK 41 PAGE 192, AND PART OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 200034 IN BOOK 41 PAGE 191, ALL OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2022024 IN BOOK 65 PAGE 294, AND ALL OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2022076 IN BOOK 66 PAGE 126 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, ALL IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M., CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DESCRIBED AS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 200034 AS RECORDED IN BOOK 41 PAGE 191 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, THENCE N01010'21"W, 1,799.23 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M.; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE N87°42'14"E, 1,549.13 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2022066; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE S56°13'44"E, 807.74 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF N. SCOTT BOULEVARD; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE S19029'26"E, 54993 FEET; THENCE N70°22'36"E, 40.00 FEET; THENCE S19°37'24"E, 33.00 FEET; THENCE S69°03'42"W, 1,213.46 FEET, THENCE S69°03'59"W, 863.50 FEET; THENCE S73°21'59"W, 366.60 FEET; THENCE 127.02 FEET ALONG A 1145.99 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY (CHORD BEARING S76°54'48"W, 126.95 FEET) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DESCRIBED AREA CONTAINS 72.17 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, LEGEND O SET 3/4" 0 PIPE OPC 19828 X SET CUT X a FOUND PROPERTY CORNER -AS LABELED OPC ORANGE PLASTIC CAP YPC YELLOW PLASTIC CAP RPC RED PLASTIC CAP EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BOUNDARY/PROPERTY LINE "- - EXISTING EASEMENT ----- PROPOSED EASEMENT --.._. __....".._ SECTION LINE I LINE TABLE LINE# LENGTH SEARING L1 42.46 N01' 10' 21"W L2 44.98 N69' 04' 11"E L3 16.40 N69° 04' 11"E L4 366.28 569' 04' 09"W L5 32.45 S45' 16' 40"E L6 9.91 N06' 25' 34"E L7 5.38 526' 46' 56"W L8 19.46 526' 46' 56"W L9 10.00 N26' 46' 56"E L10 24.08 N70° 46' 00"W Lll 18.95 S08' 27' 19"W L12 17.19 N08' 27' 19"E L13 22.38 N41' 43' 32"W L14 14.62 N87° 17' 02"W L15 10.74 S63' 13' 04"E LINE TABLE LINE # LENGTH BEARING L17 10,00 S26° 46' 56"W L18 15.00 N63° 13' 04"W L19 10.00 S26" 46' 56"W L20 14.85 j N16' 56' 39"W L21 15.97 S55' 43' 16"E L22 20.00 S13" 45' l6"W L23 18.23 S05° 25' 34"W L24 32,11 N24' 27' 46"E L25 43.84 Nos' 05' 15"W L26 22.31 N06" 25' 34"E L27 20.00 S32° 45' 17"W L28 17.16 N46° 16' 37"W L29 19.63 S63'13'04"E L30 40.00 N70° 22' 35"E L31 33.00 S19" 37' 24"E • rV'� 0-18 AC L25 w ss�° S8 1 ° � S9 74.1I 8,020 SF o \ 31 41 " • 336, , S2.34° z ss'°z I I s°7� �i"E �� 19 PA C E L \ M 0.19 AC MI 46.85 A N LO tv j -I 8,241 SF --� S56° 13' 08"E 1�G' n i \ N83 ° 3 " )" �I m 43.34' ,�,}; \ 66 ! 1� 1 4 26 W I20.00' rrn m 1 S o� © o a �� 9.51' (V N 0.19 AC 1 , A j � 8,416 SF Qtli � 1 A CL� o 0.22 AC ! p i �I 9,600 5� j00 a_ o_ 1 �r 1 0.21 AC a a M tta 9,000 SF 11 m Ir i o " n�i � 0 83 ° 34' 26 "E N83 ° 34' 26 © o 12Q.00' "w 1TO.OT �s � �' N�� 16 11 ,� �o sy • r? f'� QQ c� "' a N 'j " j V � T L T L.7 tan wai 0, 21 AC 2 12 7.65 AC cr,u_ 9,0005E � Q 0,27 AC 4 0.22 AC 333,428 SF D D 1 11677 SF I 9,737 SF 3 o So :3 6 a q ° �-I"E 150 11 00 o CAI ti o 1 A 1 0,21 AC ' 49�"E- 11 w \ �y�p, 11 `S`y� 9,0005F 1 0.23 AC 11 9,977 SF �� 3 \\ �g �t`E 2 6 E0.27 AC ` , 1 ti 544.88 a�` ti •° 11,677 SF �\ \ 10 65 66, N 14 1 sty 30� `1 030' `��� 0.21 AC 0.32 AC a 30' 1 9,345 SF �s 14,109 SF �G �•�S Q S � � � ,`' 6g0` 1 4 9 0.25 AC \\ �O. 0.20 AC ! w •�• " U, 10,878 SF ° b i ` 8,700 SF fi 4� > 13 - j° `i�O \` °� dy�� `rj \ .�c.,y'y gip, ° 45' 04„W 07.84 0 LL 0.58AC Pp�pS� T1� `,�`y 25,1$9 SF rn sT .'LO \ °� '�� as 3�, RO uj I1 I f 9 0,24 AC �' Z \`•��10,311 SE Ss�°��� a0 ' / �69 p -' N . 11O d1 1 0.25 AC \ \ 569CP r� 569 04 09 W 00 n 11,105 sF �,tH 67� 40.38' \\ C17 �- J� 0.94 AC \ •. ' 40,7845E A- W 1/4 TH [gi i 1 NOF E NE 1/4 - - _.� _ _ . is t a `r � � 69° 06 SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 �, "E �3�$g \ �' "PARCEL IIAn - •,� . y1 0_ ° p� 6' \ ` N69 d 68 6 0.47 AC 0.24 AC �� , 20,483 SF A S/ a - a 10,632 5F 1- p Oa = %`� J ^ 1 i pit 11t� A 1 �+ N�,9 1 �o • u� 1 ' 9� / I - 7 10.3S AC 5,230SF 1 c7� •, - 'r��Opp�PSEM O UTLOT A w�N �.11 = �t 615 9 / 0 - o I KEY NOTES: (D 20' ACCESS EASEMENT 15' UTILITY EASEMENT © 50' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (BK 5971 PG 298-302) © 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT Q CONSERVATION EASEMENT Q STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT Q EXISTING CONSERVATION EASEMENT (BK 3237, PG 210) © 25' STORM SEWER EASEMENT © MAILBOX CLUSTER. REFER TO OUTLOT D DETAIL Q 10' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Q EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT FROM 0 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT CELL TOWER SITE PLAN BLD10-00134 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Q 25' TRAIL EASEMENT CURVE TABLE CURVE # LENGTH RADIUS i DELTA CHORD DIR. CHORD LEN. C1 127.02 1145.99 6'21'02" S76' 54' 48"W 126.95 C2 109.83 715.72 8'47'32" 576'34'53"W 109,72 C3 357.82 6000.00 3'25'01" S70° 48' 01"W 357.77 C4 85.28 200.00 24°25'52" N33' 03' 44"W 84.54 C5 180.48 200.00 51'42'13" N19` 25' 33"W 174.42 C6 124.35 350.00 20'21'22" N16' 36' 15"E 123.70 C7 111.95 350,00 18'19'37" 572° 22' 53"E 111.48 C8 35.06 350.00 5°44'21" S84° 24' 52"E 35.04 C9 376.43 350.00 53°26'15" S47' 35' 15"E 314.73 C10 215.86 150.00 82'27'04" S68° 00' 28"W 197.71 Cil 179.07 150.00 68'24'01" N36° 34' 00"W 168.63 C12 66.11 350.00 10"49'18" NO3' 02' 40"E 66.01 C13 23.54 15.00 89'54'59" S24' 06' 42"W 21.20 C14 23.58 15.00 90°05'03" N65" 53' 19"W 21.23 C15 19.87 170,00 6"41'48" S24° 11' 42"E 19.86 C16 52.62 170.00 17'44`04" S36' 24' 38"E 52.41 C17 8.04 230.00 2'00'08" N21' 50' 52"W 8.04 C18 66.90 230.00 16'39'54" N31' 10' 52"W 66,66 C19 23.14 230.00 5°45'50" N42` 23' 45"W 23.13 C20 27.80 170.00 9'22'10" N40` 35' 35"W 27.77 C21 125.61 170.00 42'20'03" N14` 44' 28"W 122.77 C22 47.55 230.00 11.50'45" S39° 21' 17"E 47.47 C23 80.00 230.00 19°55'44" S23' 28' 03"E 79.60 C24 80.00 230.00 19'5544" S03` 32' 19"E 79,60 C25 34.21 380.00 5'09'30" S09° 00' 18"W 34.20 C26 100.80 380.00 15°11'52" S19' 10' 59"W 100.50 C27 23.56 15.00 90"00'00" S18' 13' 04"E 21.21 C28 45.99 65.00 40°32'25" S42' 56' 51"E 45.04 C29 52,50 65.00 46'16'24" S00' 27' 33"W 51.08 C30 56.11 65.00 49'27'36" S48' 19' 33"W 54.38 C31 49.61 65.00 43.43'35" N85' 04' 52"W 48.41 C32 23.56 15.00 90°00'00" 571' 46' 56"W 21.21 C33 68.93 320.00 12'20'28" N12' 35' 48"E 68.79 C34 44.76 320.00 8'00'54" N22" 46' 29"E 44.73 C35 23.56 15.00 90"00'00" N71' 46' 56"E 21.21 C36 23.56 15.00 90°00'00" N18° 13' 04"W 21.21 C37 172.69 120.00 82'27'04" N68' 00' 28"E 158.17 C38 57.55 180.00 18`19'08" S35° 56' 30"W 57.31 C39 72.06 180.00 22'56'20" S56134' 14"W 71.58 C40 75.92 180.00 24'09'57" S80' 07' 22"W 75.36 C41 53.49 180.00 17°01'39" N79' 16' 50"W 53.30 C42 37,58 180.00 11°57'39" N64° 47' 11"W 37.51 C43 75.00 180.00 23"52'24" N46' 52' 10"W 74.46 C44 75.00 180.00 23'52'24" N22° 59' 46"W 74.46 C45 27.31 180.00 8'41'34" N06' 42' 47"W 27,28 C46 143.26 120.00 68'24'01" S36° 34' 00" E 134.90 C47 60.44 320.00 10'49'18" 503' 02' 40"W 60.35 C48 71.77 380.00 10°49'18" NO3° 02' 40"E 71.67 C49 70.78 49.00 82"45'41" N32' 55' 32"W 64.78 C50 66.18 45.00 84'15'39" S50` 35' 08"W 60.37 C51 32.05 320,00 5'44'21" N84' 24' 52"W 32.04 C52 60.09 320.00 10°45'36" N76° 09' 53"W 60.01 C53 42.26 320.00 7'34'01" N67° 00' 05"W 42.23 C54 51.55 380.00 7'46'21" 567' 06' 15"E 51.51 C55 70.00 380.00 10"33'16" S76" 16' 03"E 69.90 C56 4.75 380.00 0'42'58" 581" 54' 10"E 4.75 C57 33.31 380.00 V01'23" S84° 46' 21"E 33.30 C58 25.88 33.00 44'56'19" S64' 48' 53"E 25.22 C59 75,16 56,00 76'53'57" S80' 47' 42"E 69.64 C60 25.88 33.00 44'56'19" N83° 13' 29"E 25.22 C61 14.66 320.00 2'37'31" S72` 59' 36"E 14.66 C62 72.79 320.00 13'02'00" S65' 09' 51"E 72.63 C63 74.94 320.00 13'25'02" S51' 56' 20"E 74.76 C64 74.94 320.00 13'25'02" S38' 31' 19"E 74.76 C65 61.13 320.00 10'56'41" 526° 20' 28"E 61.03 C66 17.41 380.00 2"37'31" N72' 59' 36"W 17.41 C67 65.00 380.00 9°48'02" N66` 46' 50"W 64.92 C68 60.00 380.00 9'02'48" N57' 21' 25"W 59.94 C69 79.23 380.00 11'56'48" N46' 51' 36"W 79.09 C70 132.77 380.00 20'01'05" N30' 52' 40"W 132.09 C71 23.56 15.00 89°58'55" S24° 07' 20"W 21.21 C72 23.57 15.00 90,01,051, N65' 52' 40"W 21.22 C73 47.62 39.00 69`57'13" N75° 53' 31"W 44.71 0 25 50 w 0 0 0 0 a N '-[ N O M N P 0 o tLLj �� (V 0 Oa IL D 0 0 0 0 _ Z w w w w 0 > > > > s Q ate. Lu fIUI�wl� W O i W W w {f) z J Q Q (� Wec �- W G � ❑ w Z U Q _ u O > zw LLI o a V Q z L U- W V) Q � g W Q o z O a z G O Z o LU = I.L ° N a SHEET NUMBER: 20F3 Apr 06, 2023 - 1:00pm S:\PROJECTS\2020\200047\OS Design Civi -Survey Plats 200047 - FP.dwR Page 3 of 3 FINAL PLAT MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY, IOWA 70 42' 14* 210.58' O UTLOT E N84005' 01"W 233.92` w tD LA �I ®as-01, §Q! 0 00 1141 N870 42' 1411E 1,549.13' y \.y/ \ \ ' \,,;r\ \ \ ` \ '/ \ l' �' . iM) AUDITOR'S PARCEL 200034 %- \\ \ \ / ' \ / / , \\ AUDITOR'S PARCEL 200D33 8$ \7°.\/ \/ \ \ \ v v v Z,9,a\ / 42 0.31 AC / //X V% A v'' A.� \/�blu\�,L" 3T�E\/ \ ♦/ V /f !�514 SF 4.28AC 1 03 \xj,. ' `•yi v;' v1:251`�C. .\ % v '``vv .y �, BA•12,0195E O /Jk73rSFy / \ \ i' `\ v0.33 AC 44 c r''�V��14,459O 1.: *� 0.25 AC �'' >'�' >, x' �:' Y 3 93 \ 11,050sF w ` x '�' k45 C \ / v % v "� Cf40 C4i � � 0.27 AC �o 6, ` ;AV vv nv ��, h / v ;C l� t.10 E 11,652 SF F vx' ; ' �, ;: ' 40 �,\ j� `V A ' A� - 0.43 AC 1' • ,y147 61 ; % • ` 18,729 5F \ '�j $$ cp 37 29, 0411 > jar t0 \ N55043' 16"W • / 5, W?j / cb / ') A���� �44�, 2 �[ 36.71' .� .06. / C G3 �- - -- ON I� / Lz azz \ 39 • / \ k\ Y\ i �6 0.47 AC 7 20,520 5F 1F 57 �. ._ •7�,�x � ` 1 G Z A 11,482 SF ' / 30' ' y9a 3�� 36p \ / / \ 58 A t0.35 Ac Q ` \ E �h0� p \ ° \ �i� 0.26 AG 6 �1 15,204 SF '� 83 ^ry C 11,138 SF ti \ 59 35 � � 37 \ / 56 �' • � 12,54USF 15,735 5F 1 4.00 ry�O 9,490 SF \ 8,700 SF /1 /n\ 60 1. +� 0.34 AC C31 �p 38 O I j h'y �/ 14,769 SF • 0.25 AC /DO ° , �^ 10 �� ` 10,7425E / ry�. / / � ! Tl UD j /55 s to �. `80gr ; A F 0.19 AC59, • 65' \ \ S s,1�sF /, cr 587 ° 38' 00"W 138.88' t• 34 _ 68 / 63a 0.29 AC o0 12,556 SF tO a 19' a1„ S6� / 46 0.30 AC 13,128 5F KEYNOTES: p 20' ACCESS EASEMENT Q 15' UTILITY EASEMENT 0 50' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (SK 5971 PG 298-302) © 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT Q STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING CONSERVATION EASEMENT (BK 3237, PG 210) Q 25' STORM SEWER EASEMENT 0 MAILBOX CLUSTER. REFER TO OUTLOT D DETAIL . �E 10' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT FROM d 15' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT CELL TOWER SITE PLAN BLD10-00134 20' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT Q 25' TRAIL EASEMENT a \ 47 0.30 AC 12,923 SF 1 Sa S5, �6t' � 133.50, N7 nP lJz 48 E 0.25 AC 11,088 SF N87° 38' 0011E 130.00' • � l 49 61 54 q 0.22 AC to Ln 9,750 5F F •� cu 9,498 SF t 65 1 11 11 0.23AC 65 ` PARCEL B 9,936SF 0.35AC j 5.48 AC �� 15.1105E 64 w 587° 38' 00'W 114.40' • e' ! Q 238,562 SF Q� ° 0.29 AG cri 63 N$7° 38F f]0" 13fl.a0' N p 90 12,706 SF 029 AC 0 4.00' � �r ` rf j 12,807 SF 0 00 . \ 00• N26" 46' S6"E00 0 `t �,.' v o \ 35.00' ' \ A z U u! 33 �tirF 4� `" 0.29 AC ' 62 12,472 SF A p4 \ /�` 6) r • 1 O L D • C`S.3 13,058 C � � • 05.360 cow 32 �ryo A �, / \\� ONO�� O.a05 C cs `Y j -� rn 15,695 SF 0.20 AC N c l hti 8,760 SFL7 n1� E �C 4.91' 1 -� 3 c0 • 80.001 • aoCS1 � \\ 30, 31.Oif • 14 G i� \ C. 31 / 30 ^ \ 0.24 AC 0.25 AC� \� 10,350 5F , 10,975 SF 'tiM �'S� 8-1 CD (a I 1ST _� 30' 4i 13°S 9z z1.9 ~�� �6 • A F 29 -� ass C 87 1 ' Dom" • ass 0.22 AC ,yy �_ 70 3 S • 3` 4 i . p01 �0 13 1 AO�rr 0 O n LEGEND O SET 3/4 0 PIPE OPC 19828 X SET CUT X 0 FOUND PROPERTY CORNER -AS LABELED OPC ORANGE PLASTIC CAP YPC YELLOW PLASTIC CAP RPC RED PLASTIC CAP EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED BOUNDARY/PROPERTY LINE EXISTING EASEMENT - � _ = PROPOSED EASEMENT - - - -- SECTION LINE 0.28 AC Z12,027 SF 52 0.21 AC ti 9,341 SF ry�ti \ ti ti� 9,450 SF z x8' C67 A -- C57 cS $0 \ ^ate 53 • °0� H 4 C5 - `�- 8 C68 �� 0.27 AC 0.23 AC - 19.59, • 11720 SF V =ti 9,9545E p �] g C6D 38 27 Cs9 �4, 0.25 AC w •'► q �� 61 ` 1 v / � � A `' ' v /' �a� • A\ '' \// S 11,055 SF ��y 26 41 co ^ 0.22 AC s \e A\ • v .%/ V ��• ' ^ 9,495S 5 41 � 24 h: jA t� `� S760 x4, L24 yi x ` F 3 838y, �7 n� 9,445 SF 0.23 AC 0./'1'1 l i� `y \ \ .' 7Q�ufi 1 ; \\ j \�6 10,041 SF ry v i . '� N �� /' �'v ' v /',v v / / \ • S%° 22 36, O m 8,851 SF p 0.20 AC i v� �.\ V / x.v / n vv 45tr 92.5S' Z ry j� 8,763 SF N21 \ / / I � v v / � � +� � 4 � j � v,\ v � v i v / i i ' v A /� v • �Q , � ° � 0.19 AC ��� • ,1 �, v �;`v 20 \ \/ .S� Y \ \�, .\K / / \, y' \, \ ! \.'' \ k \ ,' ' e • ry'�' 0.18 AC tb \ C' x/ ,y i / % \ i° Sx 32 4 „ 3 c 74.li' s 02o sF `'s r 89, to Ap k J co \ O i 1 / \ \ i I N 4 / \ 10 4 19 / r y E N 'V - ` % \ \ v \ 1 / y \ \ / r 0 0.19 AC ` y \ ` / / �8r ` / \\. / \ ` / , i \ // / `•\\/' \ % \� / / \ i' \\ \\/ ' / \ j / `` `\ j +, / ` ,.x f . / / \ \ 8,241 S ` > " A �, %/ ul ,,. �r.. /� /` ' TLO1. V v � / v` < n ✓ a �t NCO' �6 O cl 0 Ln 0 N �cn J T-1 Z 0. 0 u ><z O O_ L w bow w 0 25 so N N M M lJJ N N N N oo ch A d, ,V rl N Q ,n Lu C'3 z Lou 0 s a a s a s n O w w w �t�Lu a Lu uj n X. z Lu s� ' li \. O W Lu Z Q _J = F_ Q ((z� V W ]- W z z Q dJ CO ZW a G o 0 66 7.76 AC CFI "k z Lu 338,024 SF" " La CL w J d" �Q zo Z G O z wi uJ SHEET NUMBER; 30F3 -1:00pm S:\PROJECTS\2020\200047\0S Design ivi - urvey Pats 2 7 - FP. wg ATTACHMENT 6 Applicant Submittal Materials — Rezoning Exhibit, Applicant Statement, Elevations and Traffic Study HARVEST PRESERVE ZONING ID—RS MONUMENT HILLS OUTLOT F \ ZONING \ OPD / RS-5 \ HARVEST PRESERVE FOUNDATION, INC. \ \ ZONING ID—RS — — — — \ HARVEST PRESERVE \. FOUNDATION, INC. ID—RS MONUMENT HILLS/\ \ \ ZONING OP D RS-5/ / \ \ MONUMENT HILLS OUTLOT C V \ ZONING \ \ OPD / RS-5 \ JNB IOWA CITY, LLC ZONING ID—RS — — — JNB IOWA CITY, LLC ZONING ID—RS MONUMENT FARMS, LLC ZONING ID—RS LT REZONING EXHIBIT LOT 66 MONUMENT FARMS, LLC ZONING ID—RS \ w \ "' > Q \ 0 103 \ °C Lf Lu �2 \ oc Q \ roc �- OLD TOWNE VILLAGE ZONING CC2 OLD TOWNE VILLAGE ZONING \ CC2 \ , ZONING\ \ l� N MONUMENT HILLS OPD / RS—5��) \ V 0 \ \1 1 �-- ---r \ _ OUTLOT B \ ZONING / \ \ % OPD RS-5 \\ \ 3 A / \ / ROHE HEIGHTS R \ O2 \ \ G 1 \ \ / / ZONING \ w \ \ �G Q RS-5 DEAN OAKES V\ MONUMENT HILLS \ WOODS ZONING OUTLOT A �" RS-5�" OLD TOWNE VILLAGE ZONING OPD RS-5 \ Q CHESTER 1EIGHTS 07 ?ONING 0NIN Al RS-5 ZONING \�- / \ \ \ CC2 ROCHESTER \ \ HEIGHTS ZONING RS-5 MONUMENT HILLS IOWA CITY, IA LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 66 MONUMENT HILLS AS RECORDED IN BOOK 66 PAGE 267-269 OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, CITY OF IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. SAID LOT CONTAINS 7.76 ACRES AND IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. APPLICANT INFORMATION PROPERTY OWNER MONUMENT HILLS, LLC 221 E BURLINGTON ST IOWA CITY, IA 52240 (319) 631-1894 APPLICANT / DEVELOPER JACOB WOLFGANG NELSON CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT 665 GRAND AVE, STE 200 DES MOINES, IA 50309 (515) 720-6170 CIVIL ENGINEER MICHAEL J. WELCH, PE SHOEMAKER AND HAALAND 160 HOLIDAY ROAD CORALVILLE, IA 52241 319-351-7150 ZONING INFORMATION CURRENT ZONING OPD / RS-5 PROPOSED ZONING OPD / RM-12 F/77 N OLD TOWNE VILLAGE 0 50 100 150 200 ZONING \ OPD / RS-5 \ FEET CLIENT PROJECT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER Shoemaker NELSON CONSTRUCTION LOT 66 MONUMENT HILLS REZONING EXHIBIT 24317 & DEVELOPMENT ISSUED DATE: 05-07-2025 00,Haaland DRAWN BY: CHECK BY: MJW \ NO. REVISION DATE APPROVED BY: MJW REV May 7, 2025 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT FOR REZONING Lot 66 Monument Hills Parcel Number 1012127002 Please accept the following Applicant Statement submitted on behalf of Nelson Construction and Development, the Applicant. Lot 66 Monument Hills is located on the northwest corner of Rochester Avenue and N. Scott Boulevard in Iowa City. This property is identified as Parcel Number 1012127002 and is 7.76 acres in size. This lot was created as part of the Monument Hills subdivision. This included extending utilities and other public infrastructure to the property. It is bounded on the east by N. Scott Boulevard (462 LF of frontage), on the south by Rochester Avenue (638 LF of frontage), and the west by the newly constructed Heron Drive (326 LF of frontage). The area north of the parcel is a conservation area identified as Outlot C on the Monument Hills plat. During the subdivision process for Monument Hills, the property was rezoned from Interim Development Single - Family (ID-RS) to Low Density Single -Family with an overlay for sensitive areas (OPD/RS-5). Lot 66 was projected to have 12 single-family homes, 3 duplex homes, a 29-unit multi -family building, and a private clubhouse for the residents of these units. The Applicant is now requesting to rezone the property to Low Density Multi -Family with an overlay for sensitive areas (OPD/RM-12) to allow for the construction of a multi -family, independent living building and three duplex units. The courtyard of the multi -family building will have amenities for the residents. The multi -family building is projected to have 100 units, resulting in a total of 106 units on the property. The allowable number of units by code is 15 units per net acre. The net acreage of the subject property is 7.76 acres. Therefore, the allowable number of units on the property is 116 units (7.76 acres x 15 units/acre). North Scott Boulevard and Rochester Avenue are both classified as arterial streets. The proposed multi -family building is positioned to the east on the parcel. The duplex units front on Heron Drive on the west side of the parcel with the garages being accessed from a private drive that runs between the duplex units and the multi- family building. The Future Land Use Plan within the Comprehensive Plan contemplated this area as Conservation Design due to the presence of regulated slopes, woodlands, and wetlands on the property. The Northwest District Plan includes this property in the Bluffwood Neighborhood and indicates small apartment buildings at the corner of N. Scott Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. The Monument Hills subdivision addressed the preservation and protection of the regulated sensitive features, including a conservation easement at the northeast corner of Lot 66 to protect wetlands and regulated slopes. There are no changes proposed to this conservation easement, or other sensitive features addressed during the Monument Hills subdivision process. The site is currently served by city water and sanitary sewer. Any future development will need to comply with applicable city codes, including the sensitive area ordinance and storm water management. Shoemaker Haaland Project No. 24418 Page 1 Thank you for your consideration of this rezoning application. Sincerely, A-�/w� Michael J. Welch, PE Shoemaker Haaland Project No. 24418 Page 2 ALUM CLAD WD WINDOW PELLA, MARVIN, OR SIM T&G CEDAR SIDING - STAIN ENGINEERED WD BOARD & BATTEN SIDING MTL FACIA TO MATCH SIDING LP SMARTSIDE OR SIM RnnF n III oil mim III MERIN III MMI-i Ill 0 I 0 Ill Mims oil IN ji:r7. 1.11 Mims 0 Ill I IN - Min 0 Ill I Ill I mii� 111 1 MMI MMM ME 111 IN j i J7.. Milil IM. I NMI Nil I Imevl ,,, „ .=.I ,,, I � . ,,, Imel ,,, ImMlmI �,� „ MMlmI ,,, ,,, 11 11, �� i= 11 11 11WII '.=.I 1111111 1=11 I �0 Ip F0M1won0 i ii F0 iii 1' Mro Im i 0 iiii ii i' iiiii ii li' iii �' i i'i ii iii 'Mii ii nLAMEINN � BUILDING ENTRANCE FROM XXX ST SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION \_CONC WALK-UP STOOP W/ BRICK WING WALLS LPREFABRICATED BLACK MTL RAILING LTAN BRICK GLEN-GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN MAXIMUS OR SIM ALUM CLAD WD WINDOW PELLA, MARVIN, OR SIM NMI NMI IN IN MIMIMI IN IN IM IN MINIM IN ft a III a CONIC WALK-UP STOOP W/ PREFABRICATED BLACK MTL TAN BRICK BRICK WING WALLS RAILING GLEN-GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN MAXIMUS OR SIM ENGINEERED WD BOARD & BATTEN SIDING T&G CEDAR ALUM CLAD WD WINDOW MTL FACIA TO MATCH SIDING LP SMARTSIDE OR SIM SIDING - STAIN PELLA, MARVIN, OR SIM .. ------------ irr■■11 L�riiir■r■Jeo..rrrYll 1�1irr■r..Y■rriiir■u Lyrrrl 11111 . 1 II■■!■■11 ■■■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!11 II■■■!!■■!!■■■!■■■!■ I ■!!■■I 11111 ,1 ILL■■■■■■■■M---■�---■............. .....■ ■----■..............;r..-..^---1.-----------------------III! --- 1 .rnn■r h1�■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!■ ■■■■!!■■!!■■■■!!�,■ uiiiiiii 1,.---, r,.---71 i■----■ II . ■■■■■■■■1 ■I ■ 1■■■■■■■■■ ■ 1 ■ ■ 10000000000 11 11 LIl■■■■■■■I 11 1 11 11 11111 ■ ■ 1 BEADBOARD SOFFIT - STAIN II . ■■■■■■■■1 ■I . I■■■!■■■!. . . . . ........... 11 .I ■!!■■....1 11 1 11 11 11111 I ■ 1 ... rl ■ ■■■■■■■■Y...aV...■...r■■■!■■■!■ ■....■ ■....a n■■■■■■■■■■... JL... jL... ■11■■11■■1 1L. LV..J 11111 ■.... q =]■!1 ■ !■■■!■■■r---lr--rr---�■■■!■■■!■ r---_■ r =___ 11 11■■■!!■■!!■---�r___lr---■!!■■!!■■1 Ir---� 1r.===11 11111 r===- ■ 1 ■■■■■■■■1 ■1 1■ I■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■1 Ill 11■■■■■■■■■■ 11 .I ■!!■■!!■■I 11 1 111 111 11111 11 1■ 1 PREFABRICATED BLACK MTL 1 !■■■!■■■1 ■I I ■ I■■■!■■■!■ . . ■ 1 1 11 II■■■■■■■■■■ 11 ■1 ■■■■■■■■■1 11 1 11 1 1 11 11111 1 1 1 ■ 1 1 111 ■ 000000001 ■1 1 ■ I■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■ ■ 1 111 11■■■!!■■!!■ 11 ■1 ■■■■■■■■■I 11 1 11 1 111 11111 1 1 1. 1 1 1 11 . !■■■!■■■1 ■I I ■ 1■■■!■■■!■ . . ■ 1 1 11 I■■■!!■■!!■ 11 ■I ■!!■■!!■■I 11 1 11 1 1 11 11111 1 1 1 ■ 1 RAILING L__LJL_■ !■■■!■■■1 ■I I■1■■■■■■■■■_l____l_ll__lll_JI■■■!!■■!!■ 11 ■I■!!■■!!■■LJL___J_1LJ__JJLJLLL_ll__Ll_ ■!■■■!■■■L...aL..i■...J■■■!■■■!■ I 1 Il■■■!!■■!!■---J1.---aV---■!!■■!!■■I- 1 11 1 ■■■■■■■■■■■J-■■■■■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!■ I 1■■■■■■■■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!■■■!!■■!!■-ll 1 1 1 1 ■!■■■!■■■!■■■!!■■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!■ 1 I4■■■■!!■■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!■■■!!■■!lI11 1 11 1 ■!■■■!■■■!■■■!!■■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!■ I■■II■■■■!!■■!!■■■!■■■!■■■!■■■!!■■!■III 1 11 1 i ... .. .1 .. .. .... .. ■!■■■■n�■!■■■!1'1!1!■■■■!n-■!■■■■'Il I 1-n■n■nne—n■■■■!■nnn■■■!■■rT7■■■' I I I 1 1 -��r�.. 1T'II-7---__----T"-7'll l ��1 ����1� 1����1� r--t-_---__--t_-Y--ti---t-- -----J-------------------------------- --------------- ■ !l ■I. ■I !I. I11 ■I i j li■ 77--77777i7 TAN MTL FACIA ON BALCONI i ii"r'iiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiir'`iiiii! iliiiiiiii�Ill iiiiir�iiiiiiiiio 1 ii uiiii ...,r ■ 1■■■1■■■!- ■■■■■■!■■■■■■■■■...■.■■.■■■..y-■■■!■■■!■■■!!■■!!■■■r-------------n-..■■1 ■!■■■ II ■ l........I 1 II ■■■■■■■ 1 .-F. I r'01 ■ 11 11 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I 1 111 ■1 ■!■■■ TO MATCH BRICK II ■ !■■■!■■■!I 1 II ■!■■■!■ ■I ■ 11 11 !11'1■!■■■!!■■!!■■I 1 111 ■I r1!■■■ --.JI ■ ■■■■■■■■■L---I IL---■■■■■■1 ■6...■----11.....6- 1111 1....... IIL--.■I r■■■■ ---11 ■ ■■■■■■■■lr---1 Ir---■!■■■!I BIL- --- li Y■!■■...■■!!■■r---1 11r---■1 ■■■■■ r--111 ■ !■■■!■Rrll 1 II ■■■■■!rl 111 a■!■■■■■■■!!■■I 1 111 ■1 ■■■■■ BEADBOARD SOFFIT STAIN 1 ■1 !■■■■- !I I II ■!■■■!llLLilil.i .■I lJ 111 I 111 ■ ■!■■■!!■■!!■■I 1 111 ■1 ■■■■■ 1 ■■ ■■■■1' ■1 1 II ■!■■■!!■■!!■■W 1■1 n loll 111 ■ ■!■■■!!■■!!■■I 1 III ■I ■!■■■ 1 11 !■■■� !I 1 II ■!■■■!!!!■!■■A■I ■� l ■1 l Ill !■ !■■■■■■■■■■■1 I 111 ■1 110000 L__.L_■.!Rn"I'll _■L___L_________JL___■M == =292ja_■L___[1__111J__1JL___!■■!■■LC!!!!21■L___L_________LL___■LLP.EI l T T r r-11■■ ■Ilf-�rrrT-T-r Il II I 1 1 1 I 1 I■■■■ ■f II I II I- I II II I 1 1 1 I 1 1■■■■ 111 .I .. I II I I I I I II II I 1 I 1 I 1 I■■■■■ ■11r.: III II I 1 I 1 I 1 I■■■■!■■■Y!■■Y■r■ I II I I . r"1 11 1 "'- - - y - -y------Y---------T----------r____-----r-_■nnnnnn■■■_e- - 7r �h� T-_ --�-.-.-.-.-r-----------_--_--_--_---_.-_.-_.-_.-_o -_-_-_-_-_----------�--1--------- J_____________________________-____________________________-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-._-._-.-_._-._-o_-_-_-r ..............II I 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 11 ■ III 1 II 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 11 ■ III ■ r--I II I 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 Il r--7 ■ I--� III ■ 1 III I 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 I■ I I III 1 1 III 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 I■ I I III 1 1 111 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 I ■J 1■ I I m 1 1 III 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 ■■ 1■ I I III ■ 1 III I 1 1 II ■ I I 11 1 1 n 1■ I I m 1 -- 1 III 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 ■■ 1■ I I III 1 f-- 1 III 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 ■■ 1■ 1 1 111 1 I 1 III I 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 ■■ 1■ I I III 1 I --' II I 1 1 II ■ 1 1 11 1 1 ■■.d ■'--' III 1 I EAST ELEVATION ALUM CLAD WD WINDOW PELLA, MARVIN, OR SIM - -------------------------- Lim I F11 M IN Ml MO WIN IN IN M111 M111 WEST ELEVATION ALUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS T&G CEDAR SIDING - STAIN \1/_ 12 DEEP, 1/4 ALUM PLATE WINDOW OPENING FRAME ARCHITECTURAL GRADE ASPHALT SHINGLES T&G CEDAR SIDING - STAIN ALUM CLAD WD WINDOW PELLA, MARVIN, OR SIM ENGINEERED WD HORIZ SIDING _�—�—�—�— LP SMARTSIDE OR SIM PREFABRICATED BLACK MTL TAN BRICK RAILING GLEN GERY, COLUMBIA WEST ELEVATION - TOWNHOME MAXIMUS OR SIM CONIC WALK-UP STOOP W/ BRICK WING WALLS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS INVISION IOWA CITY INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITY IOWA CITY - CITY SUBMISSION PLANNIINC I ARCH11TECTURE I INTERIORS 25009 ENTRANCE CANOPY ABOVE W/ LTAN BRICK PREFABRICATED BLACK MTL STAINED T&G WD SOFFIT & GLEN-GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN RAILING PAINTED STL STRUCTURE MAXIMUS OR SIM NORTH ELEVATION - TOWNHOME AMnl �^TURAL GRADE ;HINGLES WD WINDOW RVIN, OR SIM ED WD HORIZ SIDIN 31DE OR SIM L CONIC WALK-UP STOOP W/ BRICK WING WALLS L GLEN GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN EAST ELEVATION - TOWNHOME MAXIMUS OR SIM I LINE OF GARAGE ENTRANCE BYND J ROOF +36'-0" LEVEL 3 +24'-0" =S LTAN BRICK GLEN-GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN MAXIMUS OR SIM T&G CEDAR SIDING - STAIN ENGINEERED WD BOARD & BATTEN SIDING MTL FACIA TO MATCH SIDING LP SMARTSIDE OR SIM ROOF +36-0" STAIN ACK MTL LEVEL 2 +12'-0" LEVEL 1 0'-0" LEVEL 3 3ALCONIES +24' 0" STAIN LEVEL 2 +12'-0" LEVEL 1 0'-01, LOWER LEVEL -12'-0" RAL GRADE NGLES DOOR WD HORIZ SIDING )E OR SIM VD WINDOW GLEN-GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN PELLA, MARVIN, OR SIM MAXIMUS OR SIM ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES GAF TIMBERLINE T&G CEDAR SIDING - STAIN KITCHEN MECH VENT/LOUVERS I _y ENGINEERED WD BOARD & BATTEN SIDING LP SMARTSIDE OR SIM FACIA TO MATCH SIDING ROOF +36'-0" BEADBOARD SOFFIT -STAIN PREFABRICATED BLACK MTL RAILING LEVEL 3 +24'-0" TAN MTL FACIA ON BALCONIES TO MATCH BRICK :3�_urz•�a:��>�Y•»����rai� —DINING CANOPY ABOVE VALUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS SUPPORTED BY WD & BRICK COLUMNS TAN BRICK BOARD & BATTEN SIDING T&G WESTERN RED CEDAR SIDING GLEN-GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN MAXIMUS LP SMARTSIDE .R r�l i L-l� lam- �I r� SITE KEY PLAN PROJECT +_ SITE SOUTH ELEVATION - TOWNHOME genus [ landscape architects ] x .ROCNES�ER FVE��� Shoemaker Haaland ELEVATION KEY PLAN ARCHITECTURAL GRADE ASPHALT SHINGLES ENGINEERED WD HORIZ SIDING LP SMARTSIDE OR SIM ROOF ABOVE SUPPORTED BY WD & BRICK COLUMN TAN BRICK GLEN-GERY, COLUMBIA ROMAN MAXIMUS OR SIM HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING LP SMARTSIDE C LEVEL 2 +12' 0" LEVEL 1 0'-0" FEET: 012 4 8 ww"El"I 3/32"=1'-0" SCALE: NELS O N DATE: 04.22.25 SHEEP: CONSTRUCTION R DEVELOPMENT A4 7111k WIi,u_, ' , Hoi,'i /\NN & A S S O C I A T E S I N C E NG IN I: ICING AR(III I EC IURI LAND SURVEYING 809 EAST 2ND STREET, DIXON, IL 61021.0367 T:815•28.1.3381 DESIGN FIRM: 018.1-000918 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR MONUMENT HILLS, LLC RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ALONG ROCHESTER AVENUE IN IOWA CITY, IOWA ROCHESTER AVENUE INTERSECTION CAPACITY AND DELAY ANALYSIS, CRASH DATA ANALYSIS, & LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS May 14, 2025 3�101UIIIIIIIIIIpq ````��O oF�ssPREPARED raNq%,,�,, \� Q �. ••� i� O L • ••�� IHEREBY CERTIFYTHATTHIS ENGNEERINGDOCUMENTWAS 13Y ME UNDER MY DIRECT PERSONAL SUPERVIS7 AND THAT IAMA DULYUCEVSEDPRCFESSIONALENGINEER ION UNDER THE LAWS O/F�THE OFIOWA. r Y D. OE E • • Z • a 6j • ... • `gip 4�1011WlA1,1\o\````��. 1STSTATE �! . V /14/2025 XJRRNS IARRY D. S, P.E DATE UCEVSE N ER. 11833 MY LJCEN RENEAFAL DATE IS, DECEA+BER 31, 2025 PAGES ORSHEETS CObERBJBYTHIS SEAL ALL SHEETS Larry D. Berns, P.E. Iowa Licensed Professional Engineer License No. 11833 Expires: 12/31/2025 WHA # 1296C25 May 14, 2025 7111k WILLETT HoFMANN & A 5 5 0 C I A T E: S [ N C ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE LAND SURVEYING 809 E06T2ND STREET, DIXON, IL 61021.0367 T: 815.2"3381 DESIGN FIRK 0$84.000913 Report Summary On behalf of Monument Hills, LLC, the Cedar Rapids, Iowa office of Willett Hofmann and Associates, Inc. (WHA), in association with Shoemaker & Haaland of Iowa City, Iowa, prepared an updated Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the Rochester Avenue corridor adjacent to the proposed Monument Hills residential development in Iowa City, Iowa. This document updates the original TIS report, dated June 30, 2022, which was prepared by Welch Design and Development (WDD). in partnership with Kimley-Horn and Associates. This updated TIS utilizes the "existing" March 2, 2022, traffic count data that was obtained for the original TIS report and which is included in the Attachment pages numbered " B-F to "B-8". This updated TIS also utilizes the Intersection Level of Service reports, generated by the Synchro 11 software, which were provided in the original TIS report for the 2022 Existing Conditions and the 2026 Baseline Conditions for both the AM and PM peak hours of Rochester Avenue traffic. These reports are included in the Attachment pages numbered "D-F to "13-16". This updated TIS also utilizes the sight distance analysis that was performed for the original TIS report. No new sight distance analysis was performed for this updated TIS report. This updated study once again evaluated the impacts of the proposed development on the traffic on Rochester Avenue adjacent to the development. Specifically, the existing intersections of Rochester Avenue with North Scott Boulevard, Heron Circle, Amhurst Street, and Teton Circle; and the proposed intersection of Rochester Avenue with Allison Way were evaluated. The conclusions of this updated Traffic Impact Study are: • The five Rochester Avenue study intersections listed above are expected to function well within the acceptable levels of service for an arterial street, based on average control delay per vehicle. • No significant crash history was identified at any of the existing study intersections. • According to the original TIS report, stopping sight distances and intersection sight distances for the proposed new intersection of Rochester Avenue with Allison Way are adequate. • Warrants are not met for providing an eastbound auxiliary left -turn lane on Rochester Avenue at either the proposed intersection of Allison Way or the intersection of Heron Circle / Heron Drive because of the proposed development traffic. Monument Hills, LLC Residential Development May 14, 2025 Traffic Impact Study Introduction The Monument Hills development will consist of 66 single-family detached residences (65 proposed residences and 1 existing residence), 6 senior single-family dwelling units, and 110 senior multi- family dwelling units. The development is located on the north side of Rochester Avenue, west of North Scott Boulevard. The development is anticipated to be constructed and fully occupied by 2026. The Overall Development Plan for the proposed Monument Hills residential subdivision is shown on Exhibit 1 on the following page. Methodology The trip generation for the Monument Hills development is calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 111h Edition (2021). The average trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 210 — Single -Family Detached Housing; LUC 251 — Senior Adult Housing, Single -Family; and LUC 252 — Senior Adult Housing, Multi -Family have been used. The following intersections are being analyzed as part of this report: 1. N Scott Blvd at Rochester Ave — All -way Stop -Controlled 2. Heron Cir / Heron Drive (Site Access 1) at Rochester Ave — Two-way Stop Controlled 3. Amhurst St at Rochester Ave — Two-way Stop Controlled 4. Teton Cir at Rochester Ave — Two-way Stop Controlled 5. Site Access 2 (Allison Way) at Rochester Ave — Two-way Stop Controlled The development is expected to be fully built out and occupied by the year 2026. Therefore, the year 2026 was used for future analysis. The analysis has been performed for the existing conditions, 2026 baseline conditions, and 2026 future with development conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. Traffic counts were collected at the existing study intersections by WDD, on Wednesday, March 2, 2022, for both the AM and PM peak hours of Rochester Avenue traffic. The 2026 baseline turning movements were calculated by applying an annually -compounding growth rate of 1% to the existing turning movement volumes. The 1% growth rate is based on conversations by WDD staff with Iowa City staff. The 2026 future with development turning movements have been calculated by adding the development's trips to the 2026 baseline turning movements. The peak -hour level of service (LOS) analysis was completed using the Synchro 11 software. This software applies the operational analysis methodology of the current Highway Capacity Manual (HCAI). Traffic congestion is generally measured in terms of level of service. In accordance with the HCM 6th Edition, road facilities and intersections are rated between LOS A and LOS F, with LOS A being free flow and LOS F being forced flow or over -capacity conditions. The level of service criteria is summarized in Table I on the following page. The level of service at two-way stop -controlled intersections is based on the average delay of the worst approach. The level of service at signalized and all -way stop -controlled intersections is based on the average delay for all approaches. Geometric characteristics and conflicting traffic movements are taken into consideration when determining level of service values. Page 1 MONUMENT HILLS, LLC RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MAY 141 2025 14,'PRESERVE- __ EOUN6Rz�91V HARVEST PRESERVE FOUNDATION, INC. ` AA ` r �4 _ '57 38 2 3 " MQMlkG1ENT HILLS 0o �✓� UT41T-C 1 p ;- -Lu ---- ==° _--- --- - ; v ,�MUNUMLINT.t{ILLs 2� �,g,2 ----- - - \t t yi / ` I MONUMENT HILLS 16 � _ ��,lDD- OUTLOT B 67 68 2 GZ�G SITE DATA DEVELOPMENT DATA SINGLE-FAMILY HOME SITES (LOTS 1- 65, 68) 66 UNITS LOT 66 SENIOR DUPLEX 6 UNITS SENIOR MULTI -FAMILY 11D UNITS SUBTOTAL 116 UNITS TOTAL 182 UNITS \ \ . t♦\t \\ I / / \ \ E/r �`\ mot, / /�A � 1 \.t _ ___ �/1 F \�"� ' 1 \i� 1 / - 1 1, -.. i<, *a T,•, _. 1 / I, mil l / �///ii',-// I//// _ �R / BURS i ti r> e ` 9 Lu Lu , J y IJJ I` � LLJ _. - „ e = r z_. _. _. l > 11 w _ :_ _ � 0 75 150 225 300 FEET CLIENT PROJECT SHEET TITLE PROJECT NUMBER: SHEET NUMBER 1 Shoemaker NELSON CONSTRUCTION LOT 66 MONUMENT HILLS OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 24317 H a a l a n d & DEVELOPMENT ISSUED DATE 05-07-2025 DRAWN BY: EXHIBIT 1 CHECK BY: MJW NO. REVISION DATE APPROVED BY: MJW REV PAGE 2 Monument Hills, LLC Residential Development May 14, 2025 Traffic Impact Study Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Level of 1 Service Expected Delay Intersection Control Delay (Seconds er Vehicle) Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersections A Little/No Delay <10 <10 B Short Delays >10 and <15 >10 and <20 C Average Delays >15 and <25 >20 and <35 D Long Delays >25 and <35 >35 and <55 E Very Long Delays >35 and <50 >55 and <80 F Extreme Delays2 >50 >80 The acceptable level of service for intersections within Iowa City is LOS C/D and the significance of impacts on intersections operating at LOS E or LOS F is taken on a case -by -case basis. 1 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6rh Edition. LOS A: Free -flow traffic conditions, with minimal delay to stopped vehicles (no vehicle is delayed longer than one cycle at signalized intersection). LOS B: Generally stable traffic flow conditions. LOS C: Occasional back-ups may develop, but delay to vehicles is short term and still tolerable. LOS D: During short periods of the peak hour, delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial but are tolerable during times of less demand (i.e., vehicles delayed one cycle or less at signal). LOS E: Intersections operate at or near capacity, with long queues developing on all approaches and long delays. LOS F: Jammed conditions on all approaches with excessively long delays and vehicles unable to move at times. 2 When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Trip generation calculations for the Monument Hills development are based on national statistics contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 11' Edition (2021). The average trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 210 — Single -Family Detached Housing; LUC 251 — Senior Adult Housing, Single -Family; and LUC 252 — Senior Adult Housing, Multi -Family have been used. There are a total of 66 single-family detached residences (65 proposed residences and I existing residence), 6 senior single-family dwelling units, and 110 senior multi- family dwelling units. Page 3 Monument Hills, LLC Residential Development May 14, 2025 Traffic Impact Study The Monument Hills development is anticipated to generate 1,004 new weekday daily trips, 69 new AM peak -hour trips and 92 new PM peak -hour trips. The trip generation is summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Trip Generation Summary Average Daily Trips AM Peak -Hour Trips PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Uses Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total LUC 210 — Generation 9.43 Trips per Unit 0.70 Trips per Unit 0.94 Trips per Unit Rate Single -Family Detached Splits 50% 50% 100% 25% 75% 100% 63% 37% 100% 66 Units Trips 311 311 622 12 34 46 39 23 62 LUC 251 — Generation Rate 4.31 TripsUnit per ppp 0.24 Trips er Unit 0.30 Trips er Unit Senior Single -Family, Splits 50% 50% 1 100% 33% 67% 100% 61% 39% 100% 6 Units Trips 13 13 26 0 1 1 1 1 2 LUC 252 — Generation Rate 3.24 TripsUnit per ppp 0.20 Trips er Unit 0.25 Trips er Unit Senior Multenior ly, Splits 50% 50% 50% 34% 66% 100% 56% 44% 100% 110 Units Trips 178 178 356 7 15 22 16 12 28 TOTAL 502 502 1004 19 50 69 56 36 92 The trip generation calculations are included in the attachments. Trip distribution and traffic assignments for the development are based on the existing turning movement counts. It is anticipated that 75% of the development traffic will travel to and from the west on Rochester Avenue and 25% will travel to and from the east on Rochester Avenue. Of the 25% of trips traveling to and from the east, 5% of these trips are anticipated to travel to and from the north along Scott Boulevard, 5% are anticipated to travel to and from the south on Scott Boulevard, and 15% are anticipated to continue traveling to and from the east along Rochester Avenue. Based on the proposed layout of the development's street network and residential lots and the fact that motorists will generally seek to minimize their travel distance and travel time, it was assumed that: • Residents of approximately 53% of the development's single-family detached housing (35 of the 66 lots) will use the site's west access drive, Allison Way, to exit and enter the development; • Residents of approximately 47% of the development's single-family detached housing (31 of the 66 lots) will use the site's east access drive, Heron Drive, to exit and enter the development; and • Residents of all 6 senior adult single-family housing units and all 110 senior adult multi- family housing units, located in the east corner of the development, will use the site's east access drive, Heron Drive, to exit and enter the development. The development trips are included in the turning movement sheets for the AM and PM peak hours. Page 4 Monument Hills, LLC Residential Development May 14, 2025 Traffic Impact Study Intersection Capacity and Level of Service Analysis The existing lane configurations at the study intersections, as well as the existing peak -hour factors, were utilized in performing the intersection capacity and level of service (LOS) analysis. The turning movements are included in the attachments. The level of service analysis for the normalized existing, 2026 baseline, and 2026 future with development conditions is summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Intersection Level of Service Summary Intersection Time Period 2022 Existing Conditions 2026 Baseline Conditions 2026 Future With Development Conditions LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay 1. Scott Boulevard at AM B 13.0 sec B 13.6 sec B 13.9 sec PM C 15.6 sec C 16.7 sec C 17.2 sec Rochester Avenue 2. Heron Circle at AM B 10.7 sec B 10.8 sec B 11.6 sec PM B 11.1 sec B 11.2 sec B 12.5 sec Rochester Avenue 3. Amherst Street at AM B 11.0 sec B 11.2 sec B 11.5 sec PM B 11.5 sec B 11.7 sec B 12.2 sec Rochester Avenue 4. Teton Circle at AM B 12.2 sec B 12.4 sec B 13.1 sec PM B 12.3 sec B 12.6 sec B 13.4 sec Rochester Avenue 5. Allison Way (New Access) AM --- --- B 10.7 sec PM --- --- --- --- B 10.4 sec at Rochester Avenue The study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better in the 2022 existing, 2026 baseline and 2026 future with development conditions during both the AM and PM peak hours. Crash Data Analysis Crash data was compiled for the five-year period from 2020 through 2024 using data from the Iowa Department of Transportation's (DOT'S) Iowa Crash Analysis Tool (ICAT) for the four existing study intersections. During this time, there were six crashes (five broadside and one sideswipe) at the intersection of North Scott Boulevard and Rochester Avenue; one crash (with an animal) just west of the intersection of Heron Circle and Rochester Avenue; and one crash (with an animal) at the intersection of Teton Circle and Rochester Avenue. All but one of these eight crashes resulted in property damage only with no reported injuries. One crash, a broadside crash in 2024 at the Rochester Avenue / North Scott Boulevard intersection, was identified as a suspected minor injury crash resulting in one suspected minor/non-incapacitating injury. Page 5 Monument Hills, LLC Residential Development May 14, 2025 Traffic Impact Study There were no other crashes at the study intersections including the location where the development's new access drive,Allison Way, is to be constructed on thenorthside ofRochesterAvenue approximately midway between the Teton Circle and Amhurst Street intersections with Rochester Avenue. Based on the review, there is no significant crash history associated with the geometry of the road network at the study intersections. One crash trend was identified, however. Four of the five broadside crashes occurring at the Rochester Avenue / North Scott Boulevard intersection during the five-year analysis period involved a westbound vehicle on Rochester Avenue and either a northbound or southbound vehicle on North Scott Boulevard. This may be happening because 1) this is the first controlled intersection approach (by either a stop sign or a traffic signal) that westbound motorists on Rochester Avenue encounter upon entering the City limits, and 2) the Stop Ahead symbol warning sign for westbound Rochester Avenue traffic may be obstructed by vegetation during certain times of the year. This is shown in Exhibit 2 below. This exhibit is a screen capture taken from a June 2024 Google Maps Street View of the westbound approach of Rochester Avenue at a point approximately 400 feet east of the centerline of the North Scott Boulevard intersection. A crash diagram, a crash detail report, and a crash summary for the Rochester Avenue / North Scott Boulevard intersection are included in the attachments. Exhibit 2. June 2024 Google Maps Street View Screen Capture of Westbound Approach of Rochester Avenue Approximately 400 Feet East of North Scott Boulevard Centerline Page 6 Monument Hills, LLC Residential Development May 14, 2025 Traffic Impact Study Access Analysis The Overall Development Plan for the Monument Hills development provides two accesses to Rochester Avenue. One of the proposed accesses, Heron Drive, is located opposite an existing public street, Heron Circle. Construction of this access drive will convert an existing T-intersection into a four -legged intersection. Construction of the second access drive, Allison Way, will create a new T- intersection with Rochester Avenue. This T-intersection will be located approximately 507 feet east of Teton Circle and approximately 555 feet west of Amhurst Street. This access spacing exceeds the existing public road access spacing for Amhurst Street and Heron Circle, which is approximately 308 feet. Sight distance analysis for the new site access, Allison Way, was performed as part of the original traffic impact study conducted by WDD in Spring 2022. This analysis was conducted for stopping sight distance along Rochester Avenue, the major road, and intersection sight distance for the new site access, Allison Way, the minor road. The posted speed limit along Rochester Avenue is 35 mph. Per AASHTO guidelines, this would require 250 feet of stopping sight distance for passenger cars on Rochester Avenue, assuming a level roadway. Since the grade for the east approach of Rochester Avenue east of the new site access, Allison Way, is approximately a 2.1% downgrade, the required stopping sight distance for westbound passenger car traffic approaching the new site access, Allison Way, rounded up to the nearest five feet, would be 255 feet. Per AASHTO guidelines, with a posted speed limit of 35 mph along Rochester Avenue, the required intersection sight distance for motorists in passenger cars stopped on the new site access, Allison Way, would be 390 feet, assuming the approach grade of the new site access, Allison Way, does not exceed 3%. According to the original 2022 traffic impact study, there is clear stopping sight distance and intersection sight distance of more than 400 feet to the east and west of the proposed Allison Way access. Left -turn lane warrant analysis was performed for PM peak hour traffic on Rochester Avenue, assuming full build -out of the new development. This was done to determine if a dedicated left - turn lane is warranted for eastbound Rochester Avenue traffic at either of the development's two proposed access drives, Allison Way or Heron Drive. The need for a dedicated left -turn lane at these two intersections has been evaluated using the Missouri DOT'S (MoDOT's) online Engineering Policy Guide, specifically, Figure 940.9.1, Left Turn Lane Guidelines for Two -Lane Roads less than or equal to 40 mph. These two left -turn lane warrant analysis figures are included in the attachments. MoDOT's Figure 940.9.1 is a reproduction of Figure 2-5(a), Guideline for determining the need for a major road left -turn bay at a two-way stop -controlled intersection, found on Page 22 of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 457, Engineering Study Guide for Evaluating Intersection Improvements. NCHRP Report 457 was authored by James A. Bonneson, P.E. and Michael D. Fontaine of the Texas Transportation Institute at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas in 2001. The analysis shows that the small number of eastbound left -turning vehicles on Rochester Avenue at both evaluated intersections does not reach the percentage threshold to warrant the addition of a dedicated left -turn lane at either intersection. Page 7 Monument Hills, LLC Residential Development May 14, 2025 Traffic Impact Study Conclusion This updated traffic impact study finds that: • The study intersections are expected to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better in the 2022 existing, 2026 baseline and 2026 future with development conditions during both the AM and PM peak hours. • The proposed Allison Way access location exceeds the existing public street separation distance along Rochester Avenue. • Sight distance requirements are met for the proposed Allison Way access location. • There is no significant crash history at the study intersections. • A dedicated eastbound left -turn lane on Rochester Avenue is not warranted at either proposed development access drive — Allison Way or Heron Drive. Based on these findings, from a traffic impact viewpoint, there is no reason not to approve the proposed access locations shown in the Overall Development Plan for the proposed Monument Hills residential development. Attachments Trip Generation A-1 to A-5 Traffic Counts B-1 to B-8 Turning Movements C-1 to C-10 Level of Service Calculations D-1 to D-26 Crash Data E-1 to E-11 Left -Turn Lane Warrant F-1 to F-2 Page 8 ATTACHMENTS Monument Hills WHA #1296C25 Trip Generation for: Weekday (a.k.a.): Average Weekday Daily Trips (AWDT) NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS Gross Trips Transit Reduction TOTAL PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW LAND USES VARIABLE ITE LU code Trip Rate % IN % OUT In+Out (Total) % of Gross Trips Trips In+Out (Total) In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) In+Out (Total) In Out In Out In Out Single -Family Detached 35 units 210 9.43 50% 50% 330 0% 0.00 330 0% 0 0% 0 330 0 0 0 0 165 165 Single -Family Detached 31 units 210 9.43 50% 50% 292 0% 0.00 292 0% 0 0% 0 292 0 0 1 0 0 146 146 Senior Single -Family 6 units 251 4.31 50% 50% 26 0% 0.00 26 0% 0 0% 0 26 0 0 0 0 13 13 Senior Multi -Family 110 units 252 3.24 50% 50% 356 0% 0.00 356 0% 0 0% 0 356 0 0 0 0 178 178 Total 1004 1 0.00 1004 0 0 1004 0 0 0 0 1 502 502 A - 1 Monument Hills WHA #1296C25 Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 7 and 9 AM (a.k.a.): Weekday AM Peak Hour NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS Gross Trips Transit Reduction TOTAL PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW LAND USES VARIABLE ITE LU code Trip Rate % IN % OUT In+Out (Total) % of Gross Trips Trips In+Out (Total) In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) In+Out (Total) In Out In Out In Out Single -Family Detached 35 units 210 0.70 26% 74% 24 0% 0.00 24 0% 0 0% 0 24 0 0 0 0 6 18 Single -Family Detached 31 units 210 0.70 26% 74% 22 0% 0.00 22 0% 0 0% 0 22 0 0 0 0 6 16 Senior Single -Family 6 units 1 251 1 0.24 1 33% 1 67% 1 1 1 0% 1 0.00 1 1 0% 0 0% 0 1 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 0 1 Senior Multi -Family 110 units 252 0.20 34% 66% 22 0% 0.00 22 0% 0 0% 0 22 0 1 0 0 0 7 15 Total 69 1 1 0.00 1 69 0 0 69 0 1 0 0 0 19 50 A-2 Monument Hills WHA #1296C25 Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 4 and 6 PM (a.k.a.): Weekday PM Peak Hour NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS Gross Trips Transit Reduction TOTAL PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW PASS -BY DIVERTED LINK NEW LAND USES VARIABLE ITE LU code Trip Rate % IN % OUT In+Out (Total) % of Gross Trips Trips In+Out (Total) In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) In+Out (Total) In Out In Out In Out Single -Family Detached 35 units 210 0.94 63% 37% 33 0% 0.00 33 0% 0 0% 0 33 0 0 0 0 21 12 Single -Family Detached 31 units 210 0.94 63% 37% 29 0% 0.00 29 0% 0 0% 0 29 0 0 0 0 18 11 Senior Single -Family 6 units 1 251 1 0.30 1 61 % 1 39% 1 2 1 0% 1 0.00 1 2 0% 0 0% 0 2 0 1 0 11 0 1 0 1 1 Senior Multi -Family 110 units 252 0.25 1 56% 1 44% 1 28 1 0% 1 0.00 1 28 0% 0 0% 0 28 0 1 1 0 1 16 12 Total I 1 1 92 1 1 0.00 1 92 0 0 92 0 1 0 0 01 56 36 A-3 Monument Hills WHA #1296C25 AM Peak -Hour New ADT New AM Peak Hour Trips In I Out 11 Total 100% 10041 191 5011 69.00 1 % 10.04 0.19 0.50 0.69 2% 20.08 0.38 1.00 1.38 3% 30.12 0.57 1.50 2.07 4% 40.16 0.76 2.00 2.76 5% 50.20 0.95 2.50 3.45 6% 60.241 1.14 3.00 4.14 7% 70.281 1.33 3.50 4.83 8% 80.32 1.52 4.00 5.52 9% 90.36 1.71 4.50 6.21 10% 100.40 1.90 5.00 6.90 11 % 110.44 2.09 5.50 7.59 12% 120.48 2.28 6.00 8.28 13%1 130.52 2.47 6.50 8.97 14% 140.56 2.66 7.00 9.66 15% 150.60 2.85 7.50 10.35 16% 160.64 3.04 8.00 11.04 17% 170.68 3.23 8.50 11.73 18% 180.72 3.42 9.00 12.42 19% 190.76 3.61 9.50 13.11 20% 200.80 3.80 10.00 13.80 21 % 210.84 3.99 10.50 14.49 22% 220.88 4.18 11.00 15.18 23% 230.92 4.37 11.50 15.87 24% 240.96 4.56 12.00 16.56 25% 251.00 4.75 12.50 17.25 26% 261.04 4.94 13.00 17.94 27% 271.08 5.13 13.50 18.63 28% 281.12 5.32 14.00 19.32 29% 291.16 5.51 14.50 20.01 30% 301.20 5.70 15.00 20.70 31% 311.24 5.89 15.50 21.39 32% 321.28 6.08 16.00 22.08 33% 331.32 6.27 16.50 22.77 34% 341.36 6.46 17.00 23.46 35% 351.40 6.65 17.50 24.15 36% 361.44 6.84 18.00 24.84 37% 371.48 7.03 18.50 25.53 38% 381.52 7.22 19.00 26.22 39% 391.56 7.41 19.50 26.91 40% 401.60 7.60 20.00 27.60 41% 411.64 7.79 20.50 28.29 42% 421.68 7.98 21.00 28.98 43% 431.72 8.17 21.50 29.67 44% 441.76 8.36 22.00 30.36 45% 451.80 8.55 22.50 31.05 46% 461.84 8.74 23.00 31.74 47% 471.88 8.93 23.50 32.43 48% 481.921 9.12 24.00 49% 491.96 9.31 24.50 A3450 50% 502.00 9.50 25.00]]] New ADT New AM Peak Hour Trips In I Out ILTotal 100% 1004 151 5011 69 51 % 512.04 9.69 25.50 35.19 52% 522.08 9.88 26.00 35.88 53% 532.12 10.07 26.50 36.57 54% 542.16 10.26 27.00 37.26 55% 552.20 10.45 27.50 37.95 56%1 562.24 10.641 28.00 38.64 57%1 572.28 10.83 28.50 39.33 58% 582.32 11.02 29.00 40.02 59% 592.36 11.21 29.50 40.71 60% 602.40 11.40 30.00 41.40 61% 612.44 11.59 30.50 42.09 62% 622.48 11.781 31.00 42.78 63%1 632.52 11.97 31.50 43.47 64% 642.56 12.16 32.00 44.16 65% 652.60 12.35 32.50 44.85 66% 662.64 12.54 33.00 45.54 67% 672.68 12.73 33.50 46.23 68% 682.72 12.921 34.00 46.92 69% 692.76 13.11 34.50 47.61 70% 702.80 13.30 35.00 48.30 71 % 712.84 13.49 35.50 48.99 72% 722.88 13.68 36.00 49.68 73% 732.92 13.87 36.50 50.37 74%1 742.96 14.06 37.00 51.06 75% 753.00 14.25 37.50 51.75 76% 763.04 14.44 38.00 52.44 77% 773.08 14.63 38.50 53.13 78% 783.12 14.82 39.00 53.82 79% 793.16 15.01 39.50 54.51 80% 803.20 15.20 40.00 55.20 81 % 813.24 15.39 40.50 55.89 82% 823.28 15.58 41.00 56.58 83% 833.32 15.77 41.50 57.27 84% 843.36 15.96 42.00 57.96 85% 853.40 16.15 42.50 58.65 86% 863.44 16.34 43.00 59.34 87% 873.48 16.53 43.50 60.03 88% 883.52 16.72 44.00 60.72 89% 893.56 16.91 44.50 61.41 90% 903.60 17.10 45.00 62.10 91 % 913.64 17.29 45.50 62.79 92% 923.68 17.48 46.00 63.48 93% 933.72 17.67 46.50 64.17 94% 943.76 17.86 47.00 64.86 95%1 953.80 18.05 47.50 65.55 96% 963.84 18.24 48.001 66.24 97% 973.88 18.43 48.50 66.93 98% 983.92 18.62 49.00 67.62 99% 993.96 18.81 49.5 668.31 100% 1004.00 19.00 50.00 69.00 A-4 Monument Hills WHA #1296C25 PM Peak -Hour New ADT New PM Peak Hour Trips In I Out 11 Total 100% 10041 561 3611 92.00 1 % 10.04 0.56 0.36 0.92 2% 20.08 1.12 0.72 1.84 3% 30.12 1.68 1.08 2.76 4% 40.16 2.24 1.44 3.68 5% 50.20 2.80 1.80 4.60 6% 60.241 3.36 2.16 5.52 7% 70.281 3.92 2.52 6.44 8% 80.32 4.48 2.88 7.36 9% 90.36 5.04 3.24 8.28 10% 100.40 5.60 3.60 9.20 11 % 110.44 6.16 3.96 10.12 12% 120.48 6.72 4.32 11.04 13%1 130.52 7.28 4.68 11.96 14% 140.56 7.84 5.04 12.88 15% 150.60 8.40 5.40 13.80 16% 160.64 8.96 5.76 14.72 17% 170.68 9.52 6.12 15.64 18% 180.72 10.08 6.48 16.56 19% 190.76 10.64 6.84 17.48 20% 200.80 11.20 7.20 18.40 21% 210.84 11.76 7.56 19.32 22% 220.88 12.32 7.92 20.24 23% 230.92 12.88 8.28 21.16 24% 240.96 13.44 8.64 22.08 25% 251.00 14.00 9.00 23.00 26% 261.04 14.56 9.36 23.92 27% 271.08 15.12 9.72 24.84 28% 281.12 15.68 10.08 25.76 29% 291.16 16.24 10.44 26.68 30% 301.20 16.80 10.80 27.60 31 % 311.24 17.36 11.16 28.52 32% 321.28 17.92 11.52 29.44 33% 331.32 18.48 11.88 30.36 34% 341.36 19.04 12.24 31.28 35% 351.40 19.60 12.60 32.20 36% 361.44 20.16 12.96 33.12 37% 371.48 20.72 13.32 34.04 38% 381.52 21.28 13.68 34.96 39% 391.56 21.84 14.04 35.88 40% 401.60 22.40 14.40 36.80 41 % 411.64 22.96 14.76 37.72 42% 421.68 23.52 15.12 38.64 43% 431.72 24.08 15.48 39.56 44% 441.76 24.64 15.84 40.48 45% 451.80 25.20 16.20 41.40 46% 461.84 25.76 16.56 42.32 47% 471.88 26.32 16.92 43.24 48% 481.921 26.88 17.28 44.16 49% 491.96 27.44 17.64 45.08 50% 502.00 28.00 18.00]]] 46.00 New ADT New PM Peak Hour Trips In I Out 11 Total 100% 1004 571 3611 92 51 % 512.04 28.56 18.36 46.92 52% 522.08 29.12 18.72 47.84 53% 532.12 29.68 19.08 48.76 54% 542.16 30.24 19.44 49.68 55% 552.20 30.80 19.80 50.60 56%1 562.24 31.361 20.16 51.52 57%1 572.28 31.92 20.52 52.44 58% 582.32 32.48 20.88 53.36 59% 592.36 33.04 21.24 54.28 60% 602.40 33.60 21.60 55.20 61 % 612.44 34.16 21.96 56.12 62% 622.48 34.721 22.32 57.04 63%1 632.52 35.281 22.68 57.96 64% 642.56 35.84 23.04 58.88 65% 652.60 36.40 23.40 59.80 66% 662.64 36.96 23.76 60.72 67% 672.68 37.52 24.12 61.64 68% 682.72 38.08 24.48 62.56 69% 692.76 38.64 24.84 63.48 70% 702.80 39.20 25.20 64.40 71% 712.84 39.76 25.56 65.32 72% 722.88 40.32 25.92 66.24 73% 732.92 40.88 26.28 67.16 74%1 742.96 41.441 26.64 68.08 75% 753.00 42.00 27.00 69.00 76% 763.04 42.56 27.36 69.92 77% 773.08 43.12 27.72 70.84 78% 783.12 43.68 28.08 71.76 79% 793.16 44.24 28.44 72.68 80% 803.20 44.80 28.80 73.60 81% 813.24 45.36 29.16 74.52 82% 823.28 45.92 29.52 75.44 83% 833.32 46.48 29.88 76.36 84% 843.36 47.04 30.24 77.28 85% 853.40 47.601 30.60 78.20 86% 863.44 48.16 30.961 79.12 87% 873.48 48.72 31.32 80.04 88% 883.52 49.28 31.68 80.96 89% 893.56 49.84 32.04 81.88 90% 903.60 50.40 32.40 82.80 91% 913.64 50.96 32.76 83.72 92% 923.68 51.52 33.121 84.64 93% 933.72 52.08 33.48 85.56 94% 943.76 52.64 33.84 86.48 95%1 953.80 53.20 34.20 87.40 96% 963.84 53.76 34.56 88.32 97% 973.88 54.32 34.92 89.24 98% 983.92 54.88 35.28 90.16 99% 993.96 55.44 35.64 91.08 100% 1004.00 56.00 36.0011 92.00 A-5 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave N Scott Blvd ScottBlvd Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.77 0.72 0.78 0.92 0.89 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Scott Blvd 546 i KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave N Scott Blvd ScottBlvd Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.85 0.87 0.86 0.86 0.97 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Scott Blvd 625 i KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave Heron Cir --- Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.78 0.79 0.75 #DIV/0! 0.83 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! W, 32 Im KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave Heron Cir --- Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.91 0.93 0.60 #DIV/0! 0.92 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! W, 36 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave Amhurst St --- Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.79 0.80 0.75 #DIV/0! 0.86 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! W, 46 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave Amhurst St --- Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.92 0.90 0.71 #DIV/0! 0.93 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! W, 65 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave Teton Cir --- Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.73 0.89 0.71 #DIV/0! 0.91 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! W, 73 C KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. EXISTING PEAK HOUR: 4:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Wednesday, 3-2-2022 Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Total Approach Name Rochester Ave Rochester Ave Teton Cir --- Peak Hour Factor (PHF) 0.86 0.87 0.67 #DIV/0! 0.91 % of Heavy Vehicles 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% #DIV/0! W, 67 i 1 N Scott Blvd @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 1 Existing 170 518 348 Average Weekday 7 1 128 1 35 AM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard Q 66 Year: 3/2/22 207 a 86 173 Data Source: Rochester Avenue 974 �2 21 Rochester Avenue 422 T North 462 Welch Design Development 255 142 b 249 21 b N Scott Boulevard Q 4 I� 114 190 72 170 546 376 Future 133 539 363 Averag Weekdout ay Average Weekday 7 133 36 AM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard Year: 2026 215a180 ff22 Growth Rate = 1.0% '2 T Years of Growth = 4 481 Rochester Avenue 1,014 Rochester Avenue 439 North Total Growth = 1.0406 96 &1 266 148 b 259 22 b N Scott Boulevard Q 119 4 I� 75 1 198 1 177 569 1 392 Total Project Trips 1 1 3 2 Average Weekday 1 1 0 1 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard Q 0 4 a 2 2 t2 0 T 16 Rochester Avenue 16 Rochester Avenue 10 North 2 12 8 b 8 2 b N Scott Boulevard 1 0 0 2 3 1 FutureProject 1 542 365 Average Weekday 8 13333 36 AM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard 219a182 ff22 '2 T 497 Rochester Avenue 1,030 Rochester Avenue 449 North 98 &1 278 156 b 267 24 b N Scott Boulevard Q 4 I� 120 1 198 1 75 179 572 1 393 C - 1 2 Heron Cir @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 2 Existing 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 3/2/22 261 aff 251 t2 T Data Source: 429 Rochester Avenue 443 Rochester Avenue 425 North Welch Design 0 Development 168 161 b 174 7 b Heron Circle 11 0 13 8 32 24 Future without Project 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 2026 271 a E 261 Growth Rate = 1.0% c2 T Years of Growth = 4 446 Rochester Avenue 461 Rochester Avenue 443 North Total Growth = 1.0406 0 175 168 b 182 7 b Heron Circle 11 1 0 1 14 8 33 1 25 Total Project Trips 32 45 13 Average Weekday 24 1 0 1 8 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Heron Drive Q 25t2 ffl T 39 Rochester Avenue 50 Rochester Avenue 16 North 10 14 4 b 12 0 b Heron Circle 0 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 45 13 Average Weekday 24 0 0 8 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Heron Drive 3 296 a 261 265 t2 1 T 485 Rochester Avenue 511 Rochester Avenue 459 North 10 &1 189 172 b 194 7 b Heron Circle 11 1 0 1 14 8 33 1 25 C-2 3 Amhurst St @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 3 Existing 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 3/2/22 275 a E 262 T Data Source: 432 Rochester Avenue 449 Rochester Avenue 420 North Welch Design 0 Development 157 146 b 158 11 b Amhurst Street Q 4 I� 18 0 12 16 46 30 Future without Project 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 2026 286 a E 272 Growth Rate = 1.0% c2 T Years of Growth = 4 449 Rochester Avenue 466 Rochester Avenue 436 North Total Growth = 1.0406 0 163 152 b 164 11 b Amhurst Street 19 1 0 1 12 16 47 1 31 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b 25 a 25 25 t2 0 T 39 Rochester Avenue 39 Rochester Avenue 39 North 0 14 14 b 14 0 b Amhurst Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b 0 311 a 292 297 '2 5 T 488 Rochester Avenue 505 Rochester Avenue 475 North o � I 177 166 b 178 11 b Amhurst Street 19 1 0 1 12 16 47 1 31 C - 3 4 Teton Cir @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 4 Existing 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 3/2/22 313 a E 268 t2 T Data Source: 494 Rochester Avenue 503 Rochester Avenue 439 North Welch Design 0 Development 181 165 b 171 16 b Teton Circle 48 0 6 19 73 54 Future without Project 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b 0 Year: 2026 326 a 276 279 Growth Rate = 1.0% '2 3 T Years of Growth = 4 515 Rochester Avenue 524 Rochester Avenue 457 North Total Growth = 1.0406 0 189 172 b 178 17 b Teton Circle 50 1 0 1 6 20 76 1 56 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b 38 a 38 38 t2 0 T 53 Rochester Avenue 53 Rochester Avenue 53 North 0 15 15 b 15 0 b Teton Circle 0 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 0 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b 0 364 a 314 317 '2 3 T 568 Rochester Avenue 577 Rochester Avenue 510 North o � I 204 187 b 193 17 b Teton Circle 50 1 0 1 6 20 76 1 56 C-4 5 Site Access @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 5 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour Year: 3/2/22 Data Source: Welch Design Development 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 t2 b b 275 432 Rochester Avenue 157 157 b 0 b E0 a 275 275 t2 0 432 Rochester Avenue 432 157 Volumes extrapolated form west a z� leg of Amhurst St at Rochester 0 1 0 0 Ave. I 1 0 0 1 0 Future without Project 0 1 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 2026 286 Growth Rate = 1.0% Years of Growth = 4 449 Rochester Avenue Total Growth = 1.0406 0 163 163 b 0 b a 286 286 t2 0 449 Rochester Avenue 449 163 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Total Project Trips 18 24 6 Average Weekday 14 1 0 1 4 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Allison Way Q 1 38 a 24 25 t2 0 53 Rochester Avenue 58 Rochester Avenue 39 5 15 10 b 14 0 b --- � 4 z� 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 18 24 6 Average Weekday 14 1 0 1 4 AM Peak Hour c2 b b Allison Way EO, 324 a 311 t2 502 Rochester Avenue 507 Rochester Avenue 488 5 178 173 b 177 0 b --- Q 4 I� 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 T North I T North I T North I T North I C - 5 1 N Scott Blvd @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 1 Existing 274 657 383 Average Weekday 17 1 226 1 31 PM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard Qff Year:3/2/22 237263 T Data Source: 476 Rochester Avenue 1,142 Rochester Avenue 526 North Welch Design 113 Development 239 100 b 263 26 b N Scott Boulevard Q 4 I� 63 171 132 259 625 366 Future 235 684 399 Average Weekday Averag Weekdout ay 18 1 235 32 PM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard 103 Year: 2026 247 a 163 273 Growth Rate = 1.0% c2 7 T Years of Growth = 4 496 Rochester Avenue 1,188 Rochester Avenue 546 North Total Growth = 1.0406 118 &1 249 104 b 273 27 b N Scott Boulevard 66 1 178 1 137 269 650 1 381 Total Project Trips 3 1 5 2 Average Weekday 3 1 0 1 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard Q 0 13 a 7 7 t2 0 T 22 Rochester Avenue 22 Rochester Avenue 12 North 2 9 5 b 5 2 b N Scott Boulevard 3 0 0 2 5 3 FutureProject 2 689 401 Average Weekday 21 23535 32 PM Peak Hour c2 b b N Scott Boulevard 103 260 a 170 280 � 7 T 518 Rochester Avenue 1,210 Rochester Avenue 558 North 120 &1 258 109 b 278 29 b N Scott Boulevard 69 1 178 1 137 271 655 1 384 2 Heron Cir @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 2 Existing 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 3/2/22 172 a E 172 T Data Source: 451 Rochester Avenue 463 Rochester Avenue 439 North Welch Design 0 Development 279 262 b 267 17 b Heron Circle 7 0 5 24 36 12 Future without Project 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b 0 Year: 2026 179 a 172 179 Growth Rate = 1.0% � 7 T Years of Growth = 4 470 Rochester Avenue 482 Rochester Avenue 457 North Total Growth = 1.0406 0 291 273 b 278 18 b Heron Circle 7 1 0 1 5 25 37 1 12 Total Project Trips 24 59 35 Average Weekday 18 1 0 1 6 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Heron Drive Q 23 a 13 ff t2 T 53 Rochester Avenue 67 Rochester Avenue 22 North 27 30 3 b 9 0 b Heron Circle 0 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 59 35 Average Weekday 18 0 0 6 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Heron Drive 8 202 a 177 192 � 7 T 523 Rochester Avenue 549 Rochester Avenue 479 North 27 &1 321 276 b 287 18 b Heron Circle 7 1 0 1 5 25 37 1 12 C - 7 3 Amhurst St @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 3 Existing 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 3/2/22 169 a E 170 t2 T Data Source: 473 Rochester Avenue 494 Rochester Avenue 450 North Welch Design 0 Development 304 273 b 280 31 b Amhurst Street Q 4 I� 13 0 7 45 65 20 Future without Project 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 2026 176 a E 177 Growth Rate = 1.0% c2 T Years of Growth = 4 492 Rochester Avenue 514 Rochester Avenue 468 North Total Growth = 1.0406 0 316 284 b 291 32 b Amhurst Street 14 1 0 1 7 47 68 1 21 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b 23 a 23 23 t2 0 T 53 Rochester Avenue 53 Rochester Avenue 53 North 0 30 30 b 30 0 b Amhurst Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 0 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b 199 a 200 E15 '2 T 545 Rochester Avenue 567 Rochester Avenue 521 North o � I 346 314 b 321 32 b Amhurst Street 14 1 0 1 7 47 68 1 21 C - 8 4 Teton Cir @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 4 Existing 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 3/2/22 181 a E 167 T Data Source: 513 Rochester Avenue 523 Rochester Avenue 466 North Welch Design 0 Development 332 296 b 299 36 b Teton Circle 21 0 3 43 67 24 Future without Project 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b 0 Year: 2026 188 a 166 173 Growth Rate = 1.0% � 7 T Years of Growth = 4 533 Rochester Avenue 543 Rochester Avenue 484 North Total Growth = 1.0406 0 345 308 b 311 37 b Teton Circle 22 1 0 1 3 44 69 1 25 Total Project Trips 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b 27 a 27 27 t2 0 T 69 Rochester Avenue 69 Rochester Avenue 69 North 0 42 42 b 42 0 b Teton Circle 0 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 0 0 0 Average Weekday 0 0 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b 215 a200 E � T 602 Rochester Avenue 612 Rochester Avenue 553 North o � I 387 350 b 353 37 b Teton Circle 22 1 0 1 3 44 69 1 25 C - 9 5 Site Access @ Rochester Ave SynchroID: 5 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour Year: 3/2/22 Data Source: Welch Design Development 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 t2 b b 169 473 Rochester Avenue 304 304 b 0 b E0 a 169 169 t2 0 473 Rochester Avenue 473 304 Volumes extrapolated form west a z� leg of Amhurst St at Rochester 0 1 0 0 Ave. I 1 0 0 1 0 Future without Project 0 1 0 0 Average Weekday 0 1 0 1 0 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Year: 2026 176 Growth Rate = 1.0% Years of Growth = 4 492 Rochester Avenue Total Growth = 1.0406 0 316 316 b 0 b a ff76 176 t2 492 Rochester Avenue 492 316 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 Total Project Trips 33 21 Average Weekday 9 0 0 3 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Allison Way Q ffO8 27 a 23 70 Rochester Avenue 78 Rochester Avenue 53 16 43 27 b 30 0 b --- � 4 z� 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 FutureProject 33 21 Average Weekday 9 0 0 3 PM Peak Hour c2 b b Allison Way 5 203 a 194 199 c2 0 562 Rochester Avenue 570 Rochester Avenue 545 16 <�' 359 343 b 346 0 b --- Q 4 I� 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 T North I T North I T North I T North I C-10 Monument Hills Iowa 1: N Scott Boulevard & Rochester Avenue Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 13 Intersection LOS B 2022 Existing Conditions AM Peak -Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 92 142 21 21 86 66 114 190 72 35 128 7 Future Vol, veh/h 92 142 21 21 86 66 114 190 72 35 128 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 103 160 24 24 97 74 128 213 81 39 144 8 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 12.4 12.2 14.2 11.9 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 73% 0% 87% 0% 57% 0% 95% Vol Right, % 0% 27% 0% 13% 0% 43% 0% 5% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 114 262 92 163 21 152 35 135 LT Vol 114 0 92 0 21 0 35 0 Through Vol 0 190 0 142 0 86 0 128 RT Vol 0 72 0 21 0 66 0 7 Lane Flow Rate 128 294 103 183 24 171 39 152 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.245 0.506 0.207 0.336 0.048 0.312 0.079 0.283 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.895 6.192 7.213 6.612 7.394 6.574 7.269 6.722 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 519 580 495 540 482 543 490 531 Service Time 4.667 3.964 4.993 4.391 5.181 4.36 5.056 4.509 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.247 0.507 0.208 0.339 0.05 0.315 0.08 0.286 HCM Control Delay 11.9 15.2 11.9 12.7 10.6 12.4 10.7 12.2 HCM Lane LOS B C B B B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 1 2.8 0.8 1.5 0.2 1.3 0.3 1.2 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] Intersection Level of Service.syn HCM 6th AWSC D-1 Monument Hills Iowa 2022 Existing Conditions 2: Heron Circle & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.6 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 161 7 1 250 11 13 Future Vol, veh/h 161 7 1 250 11 13 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 194 8 1 301 13 16 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 202 0 501 198 Stage 1 - - - - 198 - Stage 2 - 303 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1370 530 843 Stage 1 - 835 - Stage 2 - 749 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1370 529 843 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 529 - Stage 1 835 Stage 2 748 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10.7 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1M►Ll9'�i011:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 663 1370 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.044 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.7 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D - 2 Monument Hills Iowa 2022 Existing Conditions 3: Amhurst Street & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.8 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 146 11 5 257 18 12 Future Vol, veh/h 146 11 5 257 18 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 170 13 6 299 21 14 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 183 0 488 177 Stage 1 - - - - 177 - Stage 2 - 311 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1392 539 866 Stage 1 - 854 - Stage 2 - 743 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1392 536 866 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 536 - Stage 1 854 Stage 2 739 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 11 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i011:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 632 1392 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 11 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D - 3 Monument Hills Iowa 2022 Existing Conditions 4: Teton Circle & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 165 16 3 265 48 6 Future Vol, veh/h 165 16 3 265 48 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 181 18 3 291 53 7 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 199 0 487 190 Stage 1 - - - - 190 - Stage 2 - 297 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1373 540 852 Stage 1 - 842 - Stage 2 - 754 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1373 538 852 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 538 - Stage 1 842 Stage 2 752 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 12.2 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i011:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 561 1373 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.106 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn Monument Hills Iowa 1: N Scott Boulevard & Rochester Avenue Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.6 Intersection LOS C 2022 Existing Conditions PM Peak -Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 113 100 26 7 157 99 63 171 132 31 226 17 Future Vol, veh/h 113 100 26 7 157 99 63 171 132 31 226 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 116 103 27 7 162 102 65 176 136 32 233 18 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 12.8 16.5 16.8 15.7 HCM LOS B C C C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 56% 0% 79% 0% 61 % 0% 93% Vol Right, % 0% 44% 0% 21% 0% 39% 0% 7% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 63 303 113 126 7 256 31 243 LT Vol 63 0 113 0 7 0 31 0 Through Vol 0 171 0 100 0 157 0 226 RT Vol 0 132 0 26 0 99 0 17 Lane Flow Rate 65 312 116 130 7 264 32 251 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.134 0.573 0.252 0.258 0.015 0.508 0.067 0.488 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.421 6.599 7.798 7.137 7.721 6.932 7.577 7.015 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 483 547 460 503 463 520 473 514 Service Time 5.167 4.345 5.55 4.889 5.471 4.681 5.326 4.764 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.135 0.57 0.252 0.258 0.015 0.508 0.068 0.488 HCM Control Delay 11.3 17.9 13.2 12.4 10.6 16.7 10.9 16.3 HCM Lane LOS B C B B B C B C HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 3.6 1 1 0 2.8 0.2 2.6 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF KH #090222040] Intersection Level of Service.syn HCM 6th AWSC D - 5 Monument Hills Iowa 2022 Existing Conditions 2: Heron Circle & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 262 17 7 165 7 5 Future Vol, veh/h 262 17 7 165 7 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 285 18 8 179 8 5 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 303 0 489 294 Stage 1 - - - - 294 - Stage 2 - 195 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1258 538 745 Stage 1 - 756 - Stage 2 - 838 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1258 534 745 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 534 - Stage 1 756 Stage 2 832 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 11.1 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i011:3WiTi=I1:1M: 1:3:aVJ1:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 605 1258 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.006 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.1 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF KH #090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D - 6 Monument Hills Iowa 2022 Existing Conditions 3: Amhurst Street & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 273 31 14 156 13 7 Future Vol, veh/h 273 31 14 156 13 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 294 33 15 168 14 8 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 327 0 509 311 Stage 1 - - - - 311 - Stage 2 - 198 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1233 524 729 Stage 1 - 743 - Stage 2 - 835 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1233 517 729 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 517 - Stage 1 743 Stage 2 824 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.7 11.5 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1M►Ll9'�i011:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aVJ1:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 576 1233 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.037 0.012 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.5 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF KH #090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D - 7 Monument Hills Iowa 2022 Existing Conditions 4: Teton Circle & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 296 36 7 160 21 3 Future Vol, veh/h 296 36 7 160 21 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 325 40 8 176 23 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 365 0 537 345 Stage 1 - - - - 345 - Stage 2 - 192 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1194 505 698 Stage 1 - 717 - Stage 2 - 841 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1194 501 698 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 501 - Stage 1 717 Stage 2 835 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 12.3 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i011:3WiTi=I1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 519 1194 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 0.006 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.3 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF KH #090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn B Monument Hills Iowa 1: N Scott Boulevard & Rochester Avenue Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.6 Intersection LOS B 2026 Baseline Conditions AM Peak -Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 96 148 22 22 89 69 119 198 75 36 133 7 Future Vol, veh/h 96 148 22 22 89 69 119 198 75 36 133 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 108 166 25 25 100 78 134 222 84 40 149 8 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 12.9 12.6 15 12.3 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 73% 0% 87% 0% 56% 0% 95% Vol Right, % 0% 27% 0% 13% 0% 44% 0% 5% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 119 273 96 170 22 158 36 140 LT Vol 119 0 96 0 22 0 36 0 Through Vol 0 198 0 148 0 89 0 133 RT Vol 0 75 0 22 0 69 0 7 Lane Flow Rate 134 307 108 191 25 178 40 157 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.26 0.536 0.219 0.357 0.052 0.335 0.083 0.304 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.998 6.294 7.431 6.829 7.625 6.801 7.507 6.95 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 509 567 486 529 472 533 480 519 Service Time 4.794 4.09 5.131 4.529 5.325 4.501 5.207 4.66 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.263 0.541 0.222 0.361 0.053 0.334 0.083 0.303 HCM Control Delay 12.3 16.2 12.2 13.3 10.7 12.9 10.9 12.7 HCM Lane LOS B C B B B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 1 3.2 0.8 1.6 0.2 1.5 0.3 1.3 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] Intersection Level of Service.syn HCM 6th AWSC D - 9 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Baseline Conditions 2: Heron Circle & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.6 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 168 7 1 260 11 14 Future Vol, veh/h 168 7 1 260 11 14 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 202 8 1 313 13 17 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 210 0 521 206 Stage 1 - - - - 206 - Stage 2 - 315 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1361 516 835 Stage 1 - 829 - Stage 2 - 740 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1361 515 835 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 515 - Stage 1 829 Stage 2 739 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 10.8 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i011:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 656 1361 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.001 HCM Control Delay (s) 10.8 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D-10 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Baseline Conditions 3: Amhurst Street & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.8 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 152 11 5 267 19 12 Future Vol, veh/h 152 11 5 267 19 12 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 177 13 6 310 22 14 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 190 0 506 184 Stage 1 - - - - 184 - Stage 2 - 322 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1384 526 858 Stage 1 - 848 - Stage 2 - 735 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1384 523 858 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 523 - Stage 1 848 Stage 2 731 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 11.2 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i011:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 616 1384 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.059 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D -ll Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Baseline Conditions 4: Teton Circle & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 1.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 172 17 3 276 50 6 Future Vol, veh/h 172 17 3 276 50 6 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 189 19 3 303 55 7 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 208 0 508 199 Stage 1 - - - - 199 - Stage 2 - 309 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1363 525 842 Stage 1 - 835 - Stage 2 - 745 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1363 523 842 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 523 - Stage 1 835 Stage 2 743 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 12.4 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i101:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 545 1363 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.113 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.4 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D-12 Monument Hills Iowa 1: N Scott Boulevard & Rochester Avenue Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.7 Intersection LOS C 2026 Baseline Conditions PM Peak -Hour Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 118 104 27 7 163 103 66 178 137 32 235 18 Future Vol, veh/h 118 104 27 7 163 103 66 178 137 32 235 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 122 107 28 7 168 106 68 184 141 33 242 19 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 13.2 17.7 18.1 16.8 HCM LOS B C C C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 57% 0% 79% 0% 61 % 0% 93% Vol Right, % 0% 43% 0% 21% 0% 39% 0% 7% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 66 315 118 131 7 266 32 253 LT Vol 66 0 118 0 7 0 32 0 Through Vol 0 178 0 104 0 163 0 235 RT Vol 0 137 0 27 0 103 0 18 Lane Flow Rate 68 325 122 135 7 274 33 261 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.143 0.609 0.269 0.274 0.016 0.54 0.071 0.52 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.573 6.75 7.969 7.308 7.883 7.092 7.738 7.174 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 473 533 450 490 453 507 462 501 Service Time 5.329 4.505 5.734 5.072 5.641 4.85 5.498 4.934 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.144 0.61 0.271 0.276 0.015 0.54 0.071 0.521 HCM Control Delay 11.6 19.5 13.7 12.8 10.8 17.9 11.1 17.5 HCM Lane LOS B C B B B C B C HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 4 1.1 1.1 0 3.2 0.2 3 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] Intersection Level of Service.syn HCM 6th AWSC D-13 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Baseline Conditions 2: Heron Circle & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.4 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 273 18 7 172 7 5 Future Vol, veh/h 273 18 7 172 7 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 297 20 8 187 8 5 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 317 0 510 307 Stage 1 - - - - 307 - Stage 2 - 203 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1243 523 733 Stage 1 - 746 - Stage 2 - 831 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1243 519 733 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 519 - Stage 1 746 Stage 2 825 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 11.2 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i0111.1WE=I1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 591 1243 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 0.006 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.2 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D-14 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Baseline Conditions 3: Amhurst Street & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 284 32 15 162 14 7 Future Vol, veh/h 284 32 15 162 14 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 305 34 16 174 15 8 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 339 0 528 322 Stage 1 - - - - 322 - Stage 2 - 206 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1220 511 719 Stage 1 - 735 - Stage 2 - 829 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1220 503 719 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 503 - Stage 1 735 Stage 2 817 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.7 11.7 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i011:3WiTi=: 1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 559 1220 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.7 8 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D-15 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Baseline Conditions 4: Teton Circle & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement 0.7 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 308 37 7 166 22 3 Future Vol, veh/h 308 37 7 166 22 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 338 41 8 182 24 3 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 379 0 557 359 Stage 1 - - - - 359 - Stage 2 - 198 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1179 491 685 Stage 1 - 707 - Stage 2 - 835 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1179 487 685 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 487 - Stage 1 707 Stage 2 828 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 12.6 HCM LOS B ►LIR.TiFMW ILVAF1 MLTAl9'�i0111.1WE=I1:1M: 1:3:aY9:3WTi9:11 Capacity (veh/h) 504 1179 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.6 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. [SPF 090222040] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service.syn D-16 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 1: N Scott Boulevard & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.9 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 98 156 24 22 91 69 120 198 75 36 133 8 Future Vol, veh/h 98 156 24 22 91 69 120 198 75 36 133 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 110 175 27 25 102 78 135 222 84 40 149 9 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 13.3 12.8 15.5 12.5 HCM LOS B B C B Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left,% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 73% 0% 87% 0% 57% 0% 94% Vol Right, % 0% 27% 0% 13% 0% 43% 0% 6% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 120 273 98 180 22 160 36 141 LT Vol 120 0 98 0 22 0 36 0 Through Vol 0 198 0 156 0 91 0 133 RT Vol 0 75 0 24 0 69 0 8 Lane Flow Rate 135 307 110 202 25 180 40 158 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.268 0.55 0.228 0.385 0.053 0.342 0.085 0.309 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.16 6.456 7.465 6.859 7.67 6.85 7.567 7.015 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 504 561 482 526 467 525 474 513 Service Time 4.874 4.169 5.183 4.578 5.409 4.588 5.306 4.754 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.268 0.547 0.228 0.384 0.054 0.343 0.084 0.308 HCM Control Delay 12.5 16.8 12.4 13.8 10.8 13.1 11 12.9 HCM Lane LOS B C B B B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 3.3 0.9 1.8 0.2 1.5 0.3 1.3 Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D-17 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 2: Heron Circle/Heron Drive & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 172 7 1 261 3 11 0 14 8 0 24 Future Vol, veh/h 10 172 7 1 261 3 11 0 14 8 0 24 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 83 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 12 207 8 1 314 4 13 0 17 10 0 29 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 318 0 0 215 0 0 568 555 211 562 557 316 Stage - - - - - - 235 235 - 318 318 - Stage 2 - - 333 320 - 244 239 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1242 1355 434 440 829 438 439 724 Stage - - 768 710 - 693 654 - Stage 2 - - 681 652 - 760 708 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1242 1355 413 435 829 425 434 724 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 413 435 - 425 434 - Stage 1 760 702 685 653 Stage 2 653 651 736 700 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0 11.6 11.2 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 574 1242 1355 616 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.052 0.01 0.001 0.063 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 7.9 0 7.7 0 11.2 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - 0 - 0.2 Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn 11111311 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 3: Amhurst Street & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 166 11 5 292 19 12 Future Vol, veh/h 166 11 5 292 19 12 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 193 13 6 340 22 14 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 206 0 552 200 Stage 1 - - - - 200 - Stage 2 - 352 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1365 495 841 Stage 1 - 834 - Stage 2 - 712 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1365 493 841 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 493 - Stage 1 834 Stage 2 708 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 11.5 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 587 1365 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 11.5 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D-19 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 4: Teton Circle & Rochester Avenue AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 187 17 3 314 50 6 Future Vol, veh/h 187 17 3 314 50 6 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 205 19 3 345 55 7 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 224 0 566 215 Stage 1 - - - - 215 - Stage 2 - 351 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1345 486 825 Stage 1 - 821 - Stage 2 - 713 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1345 485 825 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 485 - Stage 1 821 Stage 2 711 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 13.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 507 1345 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.121 0.002 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.1 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D-20 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 5: Rochester Avenue & Allison Way AM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations +' Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 173 310 1 4 14 Future Vol, veh/h 5 173 310 1 4 14 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 188 337 1 4 15 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 338 0 0 536 338 Stage 1 - - - 338 - Stage 2 - 198 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1221 505 704 Stage 1 - 722 - Stage 2 - 835 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1221 502 704 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 502 - Stage 1 718 Stage 2 835 Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 0 10.7 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1221 646 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 10.7 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D-21 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 1: N Scott Boulevard & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 17.2 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 120 109 29 7 170 103 69 178 137 32 235 21 Future Vol, veh/h 120 109 29 7 170 103 69 178 137 32 235 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 124 112 30 7 175 106 71 184 141 33 242 22 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SIB Opposing Approach WB EB SIB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SIB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Right NB SIB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 13.5 18.5 18.6 17.2 HCM LOS B C C C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% Vol Thru, % 0% 57% 0% 79% 0% 62% 0% 92% Vol Right, % 0% 43% 0% 21% 0% 38% 0% 8% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 69 315 120 138 7 273 32 256 LT Vol 69 0 120 0 7 0 32 0 Through Vol 0 178 0 109 0 170 0 235 RT Vol 0 137 0 29 0 103 0 21 Lane Flow Rate 71 325 124 142 7 281 33 264 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util (X) 0.151 0.617 0.276 0.291 0.016 0.56 0.072 0.532 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.663 6.839 8.039 7.374 7.949 7.164 7.831 7.259 Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 467 526 445 485 449 501 457 496 Service Time 5.423 4.599 5.809 5.143 5.713 4.928 5.594 5.022 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.152 0.618 0.279 0.293 0.016 0.561 0.072 0.532 HCM Control Delay 11.8 20.1 13.9 13.2 10.8 18.7 11.2 18 HCM Lane LOS B C B B B C B C HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 4.1 1.1 1.2 0 3.4 0.2 3.1 Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th AWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D-22 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 2: Heron Circle/Heron Drive & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 276 18 7 177 8 7 0 5 6 0 18 Future Vol, veh/h 27 276 18 7 177 8 7 0 5 6 0 18 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None None None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 300 20 8 192 9 8 0 5 7 0 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 201 0 0 320 0 0 591 585 310 584 591 197 Stage - - - - - - 368 368 - 213 213 - Stage 2 - - 223 217 - 371 378 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.12 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.218 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1371 1240 419 423 730 423 420 844 Stage - - 652 621 - 789 726 - Stage 2 - - 780 723 - 649 615 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1371 1240 399 409 730 409 406 844 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 399 409 - 409 406 - Stage 1 635 605 768 721 Stage 2 757 718 627 599 Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0.6 0.3 12.5 10.6 HCM LOS B B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 492 1371 1240 667 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.039 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.5 7.7 0 7.9 0 10.6 HCM Lane LOS B A A A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0.1 - 0 - 0.1 Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D - 23 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 3: Amhurst Street & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 314 32 15 185 14 7 Future Vol, veh/h 314 32 15 185 14 7 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 338 34 16 199 15 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 372 0 586 355 Stage 1 - - - - 355 - Stage 2 - 231 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1186 473 689 Stage 1 - 710 - Stage 2 - 807 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1186 466 689 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 466 - Stage 1 710 Stage 2 795 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.6 12.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 522 1186 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.043 0.014 HCM Control Delay (s) 12.2 8.1 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D - 24 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 4: Teton Circle & Rochester Avenue PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1� Traffic Vol, veh/h 350 37 7 193 22 3 Future Vol, veh/h 350 37 7 193 22 3 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 385 41 8 212 24 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 426 0 634 406 Stage 1 - - - - 406 - Stage 2 - 228 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1133 443 645 Stage 1 - 673 - Stage 2 - 810 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1133 439 645 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 439 - Stage 1 673 Stage 2 804 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 13.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 456 1133 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.06 0.007 HCM Control Delay (s) 13.4 8.2 0 HCM Lane LOS B A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D-25 Monument Hills Iowa 2026 Future with Development Conditions 5: Rochester Avenue & Allison Way PM Peak -Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations +' Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 343 194 5 3 9 Future Vol, veh/h 16 343 194 5 3 9 Conflicting Peds, Whr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None None - None Storage Length - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 17 373 211 5 3 10 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 216 0 0 621 214 Stage 1 - - - 214 - Stage 2 - 407 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1354 451 826 Stage 1 - 822 - Stage 2 - 672 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1354 444 826 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 444 - Stage 1 809 Stage 2 672 Approach EB WB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 0 10.4 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 1354 680 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 0.019 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 10.4 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 Willett, Hofmann and Associates, Inc. [1296C25] HCM 6th TWSC Intersection Level of Service - 2026 Future with Development.syn D - 26 Rochester Ave at N Scott Blvd Collision Diagram (2020-2024) 6 Crashes �3/16/2024 �7/14/2021 7/15/2021 712/7/2023 6/13/20231 1/13/2020 Clear 0 Straight Parked * Fatal Fixed objects: < Stopped Erratic 0 Major General ® Pole Unknown Out of control C Minor ® Signal o Curb ® Tree Animal Backing Right turn 0 Injury DUI < Overtaking Left turn Pedestrian a 3rd vehicle Sideswipe U-turn Bicycle p Nighttime Crash Magic Online 4/21/2025 E-1 Crash Magic Online ',DOT Crash Detail Report 20201156632 01/13/2020 09:49 ROCHESTER AVE AND N SCOTT BLVD County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Made improper turn Roadway Type: Feature: Non-junction/no special feature Severity:: Property Damage Only Manner of Crash: Sideswipe (same direction) Fatalities: 0 Surface Conditions: Dry Major Injuries: 0 Light Conditions: Daylight Minor Injuries: 0 Weather Conditions: Clear Possible Injuries: 0 Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Severity:: Property Damage Only Property Damage: $10,500 Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit 1 lUnit 2 lUnit Init Trav Dir: West West Veh Action: Turning right Movement essentially straight Configuration: Tractor/semi-trailer Sport utility vehicle Driver Age: 45 25 Driver Gender: M F Driver Cond: Apparently normal Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: Made improper turn No improper action Driver Contr 2: Not reported Not reported Fixed Object: lNone (no fixed object struck) None (no fixed object struck) 20211250984 07/14/2021 13:38 ROCHESTER AVE AND N SCOTT BLVD County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Other Roadway Type: Intersection: Four-way intersection Severity:: Property Damage Only Manner of Crash: Broadside (front to side) Fatalities: 0 Surface Conditions: Dry Major Injuries: 0 Light Conditions: Daylight Minor Injuries: 0 Weather Conditions: Clear Possible Injuries: 0 Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Severity:: Property Damage Only Property Damage: $7,000 Unit 1 Unit 2 Init Trav Dir: North West Veh Action: Movement essentially straight Movement essentially straight Configuration: Passenger car Sport utility vehicle Driver Age: 70 64 Driver Gender: F F Driver Cond: Apparently normal Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: No improper action Other Driver Contr 2: Not reported Not reported Fixed Object: None (no fixed object struck) None (no fixed object struck) Number of Vehicles: 2 nit April 21, 2025 Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Page E-2 ',DOT $ RT 3 I SI v PI f R I PJ 90M-PD�N114 Crash Detail Report 11251015 07/15/2021 11:32 1 N SCOTT BLVD County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Unknown Roadway Type: Intersection: Four-way intersection Severity:: Property Damage Only Manner of Crash: Broadside (front to side) Fatalities: 0 Surface Conditions: Dry Major Injuries: 0 Light Conditions: Daylight Minor Injuries: 0 Weather Conditions: Cloudy Possible Injuries: 0 Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Severity:: Property Damage Only Property Damage: $9,000 Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit Init Trav Dir: West North Veh Action: Movement essentially straight Movement essentially straight Configuration: Four -tire light truck (pick-up) Passenaer car Driver Age: 53 Driver Gender: M Driver Cond: Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: Unknown Driver Contr 2: Not reported Fixed Object: None (no fixed object struck) iK%I�rI6t.fIyli[Clf?zi➢,c]EVROIC? pparently normal nknown of reported one (no fixed object struck) ROCHESTER AVE County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Unknown Roadway Type: Intersection: Four-way intersection Severity:: Property Damage Only Manner of Crash: Broadside (front to side) Fatalities: 0 Surface Conditions: Dry Major Injuries: 0 Light Conditions: Daylight Minor Injuries: 0 Weather Conditions: Clear Possible Injuries: 0 Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Severity:: Property Damage Only Property Damage: $7,500 Unit 1 Unit 2 Init Trav Dir: East North Veh Action: Movement essentially straight Movement essentially straight Configuration: Sport utility vehicle Passenqer car Driver Age: 75 Driver Gender: M Driver Cond: Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: Unknown Driver Contr 2: Not reported Fixed Object: None (no fixed object struck) pparently normal nknown of reported one (no fixed object struck) Number of Vehicles: 2 nit April 21, 2025 Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Page E-3 ',DOT Crash Detail Report 1396828 12/07/2023 06:50 1 SCOTT BLVD AND ROCHESTER AVE County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: FTYROW: From stop sign Roadway Type: Intersection: Four-way intersection Severity:: Property Damage Only Manner of Crash: Broadside (front to side) Fatalities: 0 Major Injuries: 0 Minor Injuries: 0 Possible Injuries: 0 Severity:: Property Damage Only Unit 1 Surface Conditions: Dry Light Conditions: Dawn Weather Conditions: Clear Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Property Damage: $6,000 Unit 2 Init Trav Dir: West North Veh Action: Starting in road Starting in road Configuration: Sport utility vehicle Passenaer car Driver Age: 50 Driver Gender: F Driver Cond: Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: FTYROW: From stop sign Driver Contr 2: Not reported Fixed Object: lNone (no fixed object struck) 1413567 03/16/2024 21:02 County: Johnson City: Iowa City Major Cause: Unknown Roadway Type: Intersection: Four-way intersection Number of Vehicles: 2 nit pparently normal o improper action of reported one (no fixed object struck) ROCHESTER AVE AND SCOTT BLVD Severity:: Suspected Minor Injury Manner of Crash: Broadside (front to side) Fatalities: 0 Surface Conditions: Dry Major Injuries: 0 Light Conditions: Dark - unknown roadway lighting Minor Injuries: 1 Weather Conditions: Cloudy Possible Injuries: 0 Drug/Alc Involved: None Indicated Severity:: Suspected Minor Injury Property Damage: $7,000 Number of Vehicles: 2 Unit 1 lUnit 2 lUnit Init Trav Dir: South Veh Action: Movement essentially straight Configuration: Passenger car Driver Age: 65 Driver Gender: M Driver Cond: Apparently normal Driver Contr 1: Unknown Driver Contr 2: Not reported Fixed Object: None (no fixed object struck) ovement essentially straight port utility vehicle pparently normal nknown of reported one (no fixed object struck) April 21, 2025 Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Page E-4 DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Quick Report 2020-2024 Crash Severity 6 Fatal Crash 0 Suspected Serious Injury Crash 0 Suspected Minor Injury Crash 1 Possible/Unknown Injury Crash 0 Property Damage Only 5 Property/Veh i cles/Occu pants Property Damage Total (dollars): 47,000.00 Average (per crash dollars): 7,833.33 Total Vehicles: 12.00 Average (per crash): 2.00 Total Occupants: 19.00 Average (per crash): 3.17 Injury Status Summary 1 Fatalities 0 Suspected serious/incapacitating 0 Suspected minor/non-incapacitating 1 Possible (complaint of pain/injury) 0 Uninjured 0 Unknown 0 Not Reported 0 ge Severity Fatalities/Fatal Crash: 0.00 Fatalities/C rash: 0.00 Injuries/Crash: 0.17 Major Injuries/Crash: 0.00 Minor Injuries/Crash: 0.17 Possible/Unknown Injuries/Crash: 0.00 9 04/21 /2025 E-5 DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Quick Report 2020-2024 Major Cause 6 Animal 0 Ran traffic signal 0 Ran stop sign 0 Failed to yield to emergency vehicle 0 FTYROW: At uncontrolled intersection 0 FTYROW: Making right turn on red signal 0 FTYROW: From stop sign 1 FTYROW: From yield sign 0 FTYROW: Making left turn 0 FTYROW: From driveway 0 FTYROW: From parked position 0 FTYROW: To pedestrian 0 FTYROW: Other 0 Drove around RR grade crossing gates 0 Disregarded RR Signal 0 Crossed centerline (undivided) 0 Crossed median (divided) 0 Traveling wrong way or on wrong side of road 0 Aggressive driving/road rage 0 Driving too fast for conditions 0 Exceeded authorized speed 0 Improper or erratic lane changing 0 Operating vehicle in an reckless/erratic/care... 0 Followed too close 0 Passing: On wrong side 0 Passing: Where prohibited by signs/markings 0 Passing: With insufficient distance/inadequa... 0 Passing: Through/around barrier 0 Passing: Other passing 0 Made improper turn 1 Driver Distraction: Manual operation of an e... 0 Driver Distraction: Talking on a hand-held d... 0 Driver Distraction: Talking on a hands free ... 0 Driver Distraction: Adjusting devices (radio... 0 Driver Distraction: Other electronic device ... 0 Driver Distraction: Passenger 0 Driver Distraction: Unrestrained animal 0 Driver Distraction: Reaching for object(s)/f... 0 Driver Distraction: Inattentive/lost in thou... 0 Driver Distraction: Other interior distracti... 0 Driver Distraction: Exterior distraction 0 Ran off road - right 0 Ran off road - straight 0 Ran off road - left 0 Lost control 0 Swerving/Evasive Action 0 Over correcting/over steering 0 Failed to keep in proper lane 0 Failure to signal intentions 0 Traveling on prohibited traffic way 0 Vehicle stopped on railroad tracks 0 Other: Vision obstructed 0 Other: Improper operation 0 Other: Disregarded warning sign 0 Other: Disregarded signs/road markings 0 Other: Illegal off -road driving 0 Downhill runaway 0 Separation of units 0 Towing improperly 0 Cargo/equipment loss or shift 0 Equipment failure 0 Oversized load/vehicle 0 Other: Getting off/out of vehicle 0 Failure to dim lights/have lights on 0 Improper backing 0 Improper starting 0 Illegally parked/unattended 0 Driving less than the posted speed limit 0 Operator inexperience 0 Other 1 Unknown 3 Not reported 0 Other: No improper action 0 04/21 /2025 E-6 DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Quick Report 2020-2024 Time of Day/Day of Week 12 AM 2 AM 4 AM 6 AM 8 AM 10 AM Noon 2 PM 4 PM 6 PM 8 PM 10 PM Not to to 4 to 6 to 8 to to to 2 to 4 to 6 to 8 to to reporte Day of Week 2 AM AM AM AM 10 AM Noon PM PM PM PM 10 PM 12 AM d Total Sunday 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monday 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Tuesday 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Wednesday 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Thursday 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Friday 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saturday 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Total 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 6 Manner of Crash Collision 6 Non -collision (single vehicle) 0 Head-on (front to front) 0 Rear -end (front to rear) 0 Angle (oncoming left turn) 0 Broadside (front to side) 5 Sideswipe (same direction) 1 Sideswipe (opposite direction) 0 Rear to rear 0 Rear to side 0 Not reported 0 Other 0 Unknown 0 Surface Conditions 6 Dry 6 Wet 0 Ice/frost 0 Snow 0 Slush 0 Mud/dirt 0 Water (standing or moving) 0 Sand 0 Oil 0 Gravel 0 Not reported 0 Other 0 Unknown 0 Fixed Object Struck 12 Bridge overhead structure 0 Bridge pier or support 0 Bridge/bridge rail parapet 0 Curb/island/raised median 0 Ditch 0 Embankment 0 Ground 0 Culvert/pipe opening 0 Guardrail - face 0 Guardrail - end 0 Concrete traffic barrier (median or right sid... 0 Other traffic barrier 0 Cable barrier 0 Impact attenuator/crash cushion 0 Utility pole/light support 0 Traffic sign support 0 Traffic signal support 0 Other post/pole/support 0 Fire hydrant 0 Mailbox 0 Tree 0 Landscape/shrubbery 0 Snow bank 0 Fence 0 Wall 0 Building 0 Other fixed object 0 None (no fixed object struck) 12 04/21 /2025 E-7 DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Quick Report 2020-2024 Driver Age/Driver Gender Driver Age - 5 year Not Bins Female Male reported Unknown Total <14 0 0 0 0 0 =14 0 0 0 0 0 =15 0 0 0 0 0 =16 0 0 0 0 0 =17 0 0 0 0 0 =18 0 0 0 0 0 =19 0 0 0 0 0 =20 0 0 0 0 0 —21 and —24 0 0 0 0 0 —25and —29 1 1 0 0 2 —30and —34 0 0 0 0 0 — 35 and — 39 1 0 0 0 1 —40and —44 0 0 0 0 0 —45and —49 0 1 0 0 1 —50and —54 1 1 0 0 2 —55and —59 0 0 0 0 0 —60and —64 1 1 0 0 2 —65and —69 0 1 0 0 1 —70and —74 1 0 0 0 1 — 75 and — 79 0 1 0 0 1 —80and —84 1 0 0 0 1 —85and —89 0 0 0 0 0 —90and —94 0 0 0 0 0 —95 0 0 0 0 0 Not reported 0 0 0 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0 0 0 Total 6 6 0 0 12 Drug/Alcohol Related 6 Drug 0 Alcohol (< Statutory) 0 Alcohol (Statutory) 0 Drug and Alcohol (< Statutory) 0 Drug and Alcohol (Statutory) 0 Refused 0 Under Influence of Alcohol/Drugs/Medications 0 None Indicated 6 Alcohol Test Given 12 None 12 Blood 0 Urine 0 Breath 0 Vitreous 0 Refused 0 Not reported 0 Drug Test Given 12 None 12 Blood 0 Urine 0 Breath 0 Vitreous 0 Refused 0 Not reported 0 Drug Test Result 12 Negative 0 Cannabis 0 Central Nervous System depressants 0 Central Nervous System stimulants 0 Hallucinogens 0 Inhalants 0 Narcotic Analgesics 0 Dissociative Anesthetic (PCP) 0 Prescription Drug 0 Not reported 12 Other 0 04/21 /2025 W DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Quick Report 2020-2024 Crash Severity -Annual Suspected Serious Suspected Minor Possible/Unknown Property Damage Crash Year Fatal Crash Injury Crash Injury Crash Injury Crash Only Total 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 0 0 0 0 1 1 2021 0 0 0 0 2 2 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 2 2 2024 0 0 1 0 0 1 2025 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 1 0 5 6 SeverityNear 2.5 2 1.5 � Fatal Crash Suspected Serious Injury Crash Suspected Minor Injury Crash 1 . Possible/Unknown Injury Crash Property Damage Only 0.5 9 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 04/21 /2025 E-9 DOT Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Quick Report 2020-2024 Injury Status -Annual Suspected Suspected Possible serious/incapac minor/non- (complaint of Crash Year Fatalities itating incapacitating pain/injury) Uninjured Unknown Not Reported Total 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2025 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Injury Status/Year 1.2 W. W . 0.2 0 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Fatalities Suspected serious/incapacitating Suspected minor/non-incapacitating Possible (complaint of pain/injury) Uninjured Unknown Not Reported 04/21 /2025 E-10 DOT Meeting the following criteria Jurisdiction: Cities (Iowa City) Year: 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 Map Selection: Yes Filter: None nalyst Information Rochester Ave at N Scott Blvd (2020-2024) Iowa Crash Analysis Tool Quick Report 2020-2024 04/21 /2025 E-11 Rochester Avenue at Allison Way (2026 Future with Development Conditions: PM Peak Hour) 801) 700 600 -JL 17C C 5% left-.L,i. 5 3% 20% 15% 13% in V, Add Left-T� rn Lane No Left -tun Lane 3C0 4JC 5DD NO Advancing Volume (Vd, vehih Figure 940.9.1, Left 71irn Lane Guidelines for TWo-Lane Road less than or equal to 40 mph L l The following data are required: 1. Opposing Volume (veh/hr) - VO - The opposing volume is to include only the right -turn and through movements in the opposite direction of the left -turning vehicle. [199] 2. Advancing Volume (veh/hr) - VA - The advancing volume is to include the right -turn, left -turn and through movements in the same direction as the left -turning vehicle. [359] 3. Operating Speed (mph) - The greatest of anticipated operating speed, measured 85th percentile speed or posted speed. [35 mph] 4. Percentage of left turns in VA. [16 / 359 = 4.5%] Left turn lane is not needed for left turn volume less than 10 vph. However, criteria other than volume, such as crash experience, may be used to justify a left turn lane. The appropriate trend line is identified on the basis of the percentage of left -turns in the advancing volume, rounded up to the nearest percentage trend line. If the advancing and opposing volume combination intersects above or to the right of this trend line, a left -turn lane is appropriate. Source: Missouri DOT (MoDOT) Engineering Policy Guide Website [https://epg.modot.org/index] F-1 Rochester Avenue at Heron Drive (2026 Future with Development Conditions: PM Peak Hour) 801) 700 600 -JL 17C C 5% left-.L,i. 5 -3% ZO% 159E 13% in V, Add Left-T� rn Lane No Left -tun Lane ------------- INN 3C0 4JC 5DD NO Advancing Volume (Vd, vehih Figure 940.9.1, Left 71irn Lane Guidelines for TWo-Lane Road less than or equal to 40 mph The following data are required: 1. Opposing Volume (veh/hr) - VO - The opposing volume is to include only the right -turn and through movements in the opposite direction of the left -turning vehicle. [185] 2. Advancing Volume (veh/hr) - VA - The advancing volume is to include the right -turn, left -turn and through movements in the same direction as the left -turning vehicle. [321] 3. Operating Speed (mph) - The greatest of anticipated operating speed, measured 85th percentile speed or posted speed. [35 mph] 4. Percentage of left turns in VA. [27 / 321 = 8.4%] Left turn lane is not needed for left turn volume less than 10 vph. However, criteria other than volume, such as crash experience, may be used to justify a left turn lane. The appropriate trend line is identified on the basis of the percentage of left -turns in the advancing volume, rounded up to the nearest percentage trend line. If the advancing and opposing volume combination intersects above or to the right of this trend line, a left -turn lane is appropriate. Source: Missouri DOT (MoDOT) Engineering Policy Guide Website [https://epg.modot.org/index] F-2 ATTACHMENT 7 Good Neighbor Meeting Summary Summary Report for Good Neighbor Meeting Project Name: Lot 66 Monument Hills Rezoning � r CITY OF IOWA CITY Project Location: Lot 66 Monument Hills Meeting Date and Time: Thursday June 5, 2025 - 6:00pm - 7:30pm Meeting Location: FeatherStone Assisted Living, 2450 Hickory Trail, Iowa City Names of Applicant Representatives attending: Michael Welch, - Shoemaker and Haaland Jacob Wolfgang - Nelson, Evan Shaw, Invision Names of City Staff Representatives attending: Madison Conley & Parker Walsh Number of Neighbors Attending: 5 Sign -In Attached? Yes X No General Comments received regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary) - An overview of the proposed rezoning request was presented to attendees. We explained how this request differed from the previous proposal originally presented with the Monument Hills rezoning. We presented an overview of the general features of the proposal and then opened the meeting to questions. Concerns expressed regarding project (attach additional sheets if necessary) - Neighbors immediately across the street (Rochester Ave) expressed concerns about the change to their view looking north from their homes. The impact of the additional traffic at the intersection of Heron Drive and Rochester Avenue was also a primary concern. Residents indicated that traffic on Rochester often travels faster than the posted speed limit and that there are delays for traffic turning onto Rochester Avenue from Heron Circle during peak traffic times. Some residents were concerned that the rents in the building would be market -rate rather than "affordable". The size of the building and number of units was a concern from some neighbors. Will there be any changes made to the proposal based on this input? If so, describe: Not specifically; however, the applicant previously reduced the size of the proposed building from 130+ units down to 103 units during prior reviews with Iowa City staff. The applicant also included a revised traffic study with the rezoning submittal at staff's request. Staff Representative Comments Late Correspondence From: John & Canice Treangen <jctreangen@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2025 10:09 PM To: Madison Conley Subject: REZ25-0007 Lot 66 Monument Hills Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged i Fil$F{ ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** This message is from an external sender. Dear Ms. Conley, Thank you for your letter dated June 10th regarding the proposed rezoning of Lot 66 in the Monument Hills development. We are John & Canice Treangen and we are currently building our home at 969 Allison Way in the Monument Hills development. Our home is scheduled for completion on July 15, 2025, and we anticipate moving in shortly thereafter. Unfortunately, due to our current location in Michigan, we are unable to attend the meeting scheduled for June 18th. We are, however, concerned about this proposed rezoning and will make every effort to attend any future meetings regarding this proposal. As requested in your letter, we are writing to make you aware of our concerns and to seek any further information that can be provided regarding this proposed rezoning. When we purchased our two lots in Monument Hills and began construction of our new "forever home," we did so with the understanding and expectation that the previously approved RS-5/OPD development standards would remain in place. The new, higher - density proposal is therefore a significant concern for us. Our home is in close proximity to Lot 66, and we are worried that increasing the size and capacity of the development would negatively affect our quality of life and property values. Specifically, we are concerned about potential impacts on our views (e.g. a high rise development would be looking straight into our backyard), increased noise, and additional traffic —particularly if the number of residents and guests at Lot 66 increases So substantially Over the current RS-5/OPD zoning. We believe these changes could also reduce property values for our home and neighboring properties, compared to what would be expected under the current RS-5/OPD zoning. My hope would be to keep the zoning as originally planned. However, any further information that could be provided that might help to alleviate my concerns would be appreciated. Thank you very much for your attention and consideration. Sincerely, John & Canice Treangen (989-600-0490) Late Correspondence From: Larry & Barbara Luebbert <Ihluebbert@mchsi.com> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2025 10:39 PM To: Madison Conley Subject: REZ25-0007 Lot 56 Monument Hills Attachments: We sent you safe versions of your files; June_15_2.jpg; Speed Log Sheet.xlsx ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. This message is from an external sender. During the Good Neighbor Meeting of June 5, 2025 at Featherstone Assisted Living Community on Hickory Trail off 1 st Ave I expressed concerns about the proposed rezoning from RS-5/OPD (Low -Density, Single - Family) to RM-12/OPD (Low -Density, Multi -Family Residential) zoning with 100 units versus the original 47 units of the 2022 plan due to existing traffic issues. Comments were offered by the presenters that a traffic study had been completed on the intersection of Rochester and Scott Blvd and that existing volumes were well within allowances. I asked for a copy of this study, a nice young lady saying they were there from your office ask for my email and indicated I would get a copywithin a couple days. I've not received a copy nor a follow-up email, I did not get her business card so couldn't follow up. I would like a copy and will pay for it as I did for a long-range plan of the area North of Rochester now known as Monument Hills and Harvest Preserve in 1999. That report showed the subject property from Rochester North to Rawson Creek "not suitable" for development due to "unstable and steep" terrain!! I built this house on that basis. The current proposal more than doubles the density of the 2022 proposal and makes no adjustments to the street configuration to handle the additional traffic. Questions about traffic impact were brought up at the prior discussions also. Given there are 66 lots in the current Monument Hills development with; possibly, 1 (one!) appearing to be occasionally occupied the ACTUAL impact on Rochester traffic is unknown. Given the amount of large vehicle traffic into and out of Heron Drive for the 3 houses current under construction and watching their waiting times I saw the future. During these 25 years I've seen the traffic density continually increase to the current level of seeing cars stack up at times on Heron Circle to exit left (West) on Rochester and well as stack up making left turns onto Heron Circle. Our first surprise after moving in was how much traffic came and went on Heron. There are 3S single family houses served on these dead-end streets system with the average age well above 50 yr with many retired. Monument Hills has 66 lots and looking at a combination of terrain and general street shape it likely that as many as 50-55 will use Heron Drive. The number of "waits" could easily double, now add some percentage of the 100 new units! Second concern: Speeding! We now have a SIGNED crosswalk across Rochester from Heron Circle to Heron Drive. I dare you to come out and try to cross Rochester in this crosswalk from 3 -5 PM on a weekday. Attached is small speed study taken on a "quiet" yesterday afternoon. Speeds of 45-50 mph in this 35-mph speed limit are common. A couple days ago I clocked a 60 mph directly in front of the house. Don't take my word, talk with any family along Rochester. I've asked the city twice to put up a speed sensing and recording system. Guess where it was put - just East of Larch Lane. Third concern: Visibility. Attached are two photos taken a max of two seconds apart tonight standing in Heron Drive, facing East like I would if making a left turnout onto Rochester. Look very carefully at photo 1 just to the left of the utility pole you will see a faint yellow spot. Look at the second photo taken a maximum of 2 seconds later (per my Nikon D850 professional digital SLR that records in seconds). That post is 140-150 feet from the left curb of Heron Drive. Per the Iowa DOT Project TR-455, dated Nov. 2002 entitled "Handbook of Simplified Practice for Traffic Studies" the stopping distance for a normal vehicle traveling at 35 mph is 250 feet. A pedestrian not seeing this vehicle or the driver not seeing the pedestrian behind the 15 inch plus diameter of this 35-foot-tall utility pole in the foreground would probably result in severe injuries and possibly death. At the more common speed of 40 mph seen yesterday afternoon stopping distance becomes 305 feet - more than half the additional distance between the next pole to the East! At 45 mph its 360 feet! As you can see in the data, I clocked a car doing 55 mph in the short time I watched. This is more common than East bound because the visibility of the street forward to the 4-way stop at Scott is level and straight, plus there is no place for a radar trap. Coming from the other direction the cars have to accelerate the 564 feet from Scott to the utility pole I was using as the timing start point. Of course, that speed is the mathematical average speed across the 320-foot timing base. Exit speed could be significantly faster than the data shows and in many cases it was. Fourth concern: Traffic volume. Just in the hour and 40 minutes yesterday I recorded an average of 111 vehicles per hour. I'm confident I missed half because many times I was timing a West bound while many times more were traveling the opposite direction at the same time. Secondly, most of time I clocked only the first vehicle in the stream as I couldn't be sure the following one was either slowing or speeding up. Therefore, I'm pretty confident this rate is probably 1/2 of actual - on a quiet Saturday afternoon. We'll see what Tuesday and Wednesday show - if I have time. Understand you are busy so I can just pick up the studywhen it's ready. Advise primarily via text to 319-621- 3277 or reply to this email if not available until Tuesday or Wednesday. Larry Luebbert 3269 Rochester Avenue Iowa City, IA 52245 NOW - lip dp or Alk wo- Am IP J■�•i r r 4J r � � r' # w J 4 f dw .. � 'fir ► 1 dP J � � ` + • • •L It rlp AOL- Jtqr • A` #i �■ - # L It AT `' J • r +. F 1%d 4W, y # j . 17r • + 4y r } y « .0 + -• ;i k. Ilk 4 .,. - � - r • - � fi �`'t�--,�, ? - �• , # _ _ - - ; ram..:- _- ... -- - --� - Ir Al'T 1 = • - + - iris+� , 1 l Ir 0 ? I * IF - F0l SSA, i f i •� � i � A •� � J. 1 y �■� . 'Ab 4 F ry mow�, l 4 * r t 1s in # r do ~ *I piii - 3 lift -it's r (+ yft jt 16 4 _ 1 - + �, ' !� • 4W �M 4 s 1% 4 1 �f mi dli i 1 r 41 AP Y - T �.■ ■ of hOw F ■ r 1 1. IL_ r 'OC YL I _ � r1 r r • , y ' , + } 10 f 7 1p f - 1 ' W ` r �• bL } R w if ►� ,.� T Y; +rlr i r 41 r -5I . • • ti/ i+4 � 'r ' * �• • #��. yr r ,��r r • •+ AO O . i '-r' r' �• L + i Ley r '+ + y { r yr i IL ♦ Fly f {� ; � i * R r,, f w. ' :�• � `:'fit 'r� • � #t - � �'• '* �� ���. �. �, � � �N FAA r #+ P6'ri Ap + , a � ■ - r ,. _ a ig r ■ 7 ■ A �' r f y•1 + ' • �� ' • .+ i i F M ■ ■. + ` ; It Ir A 1 R 1�ej7 •�* k■ + # { � r . Ar 10 + I log A4 0 s or is. •� ' -4 -r * # ,� i F � �• + IL � f � `► 4L 4A. _ + A 4 # s / Yv IC di r}r tom. . i Art di -4 ja £k sI ■ti f A At A/ V - s too yw ICI + iF _ F -am�► HW wr FM 4L qm Ai r ...' 1� /• • ` %r - Y qp r r rr . ". i = �A? • � it - 1 � t r '- AP �� ., Ir t f ; ; • IL40 { or mL •� r / y � � �r i } s + �+ � f•r i jp 's 6 +ir. - 40 pp i a 16 f 4e - I y ti Rochester Avenue Speed Test Base - 320 feet Time -sec Speed - mph East 3.0 72.7 3.1 70.4 3.2 68.2 3.3 66.1 3.4 64.2 3.5 62.3 3.6 60.6 3.7 59.0 3.8 57.4 3.9 55.9 4.0 54.5 4.1 53.2 4.2 51.9 4.3 50.7 4.4 49.6 4.5 48.5 4.6 47.4 4.7 46.4 4.8 45.5 4.9 44.5 5.0 43.6 5.1 42.8 5.2 42.0 5.3 41.2 5.4 40.4 5.5 39.7 5.6 39.0 5.7 38.3 5.8 37.6 5.9 37.0 6.0 36.4 6.1 35.8 6.2 35.2 6.3 34.6 6.4 34.1 6.5 33.6 6.6 33.1 6.7 32.6 6.8 32.1 6.9 31.6 7.0 31.2 7.1 30.7 7.2 30.3 7.3 29.9 7.4 29.5 7.5 29.1 7.6 28.7 7.7 28.3 7.8 28.0 7.9 27.6 8.0 27.3 Totals Both directions together 111.4/hr Rate in mph=(320/Time)*360 Factor= 218.18 West 3:40 PM 5:20 PM 1 hr 40 Min 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 3 6 1 2 4 11 2 3 1 12 4 2 6 6 1 4 9 6 3 2 10 4 7 4 5 7 2 2 2 4 4 2 2 4 1 3 2 4 2 1 3 3 92 93 Late Correspondence From: Anne Russett Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 8:56 AM To: Larry & Barbara Luebbert Cc: Madison Conley Subject: RE: REZ25-0007 Lot 56 Monument Hills Hi, Larry - The traffic study is included in the agenda packet that we published last Friday. You can access it here: https://www.icgov.org/government/boards-commissions-and-committees/planning-and-zoning- commission Would you like us to share your correspondence with the Planning & Zoning Commission? Thanks, Anne -----Original Message ----- From: Larry & Barbara Luebbert <lhluebbert@mchsi.com> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2025 11:31 PM To: Anne Russett <ARussett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Fwd: REZ25-0007 Lot 56 Monument Hills ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** Mimecast Attachment Protection has deemed this file to be safe, but always exercise caution when opening files. This message is from an external sender. I just received an auto reply that Madison Conley is out of the office until Tuesday. As indicated in the below email I'm trying to get a copy of a traffic study done at the intersection of Rochester Ave and Scott Blvd as it relates to the above rezoning proposal. I would like to have time to understand prior to the meeting this Wednesday (June 18th). I was able to fix the photo that is referenced in this original email but sent in a second email to him as I was having problems with Mediacom email. It is now attached. The comments relating to the location of a traffic monitor requested in the past are about placing this device at least 1/2-mile WEST of my request. That location is the beginning in the "S" curve portion of Rochester just East of 1 st Avenue and is completely different that the straight run of Rochester starting at Windmill Place all the way East to Scott. Larry ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Larry & Barbara Luebbert" <lhluebbert@mchsi.com> To: "mconley" <mconley@iowa-city.org> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2025 10:38:30 PM Subject: REZ25-0007 Lot 56 Monument Hills During the Good Neighbor Meeting of June 5, 2025 at Featherstone Assisted Living Community on Hickory Trail off 1 st Ave I expressed concerns about the proposed rezoning from RS-5/OPD (Low -Density, Single- Family) to RM-12/OPD (Low -Density, Multi -Family Residential) zoning with 100 units versus the original 47 units of the 2022 plan due to existing traffic issues. Comments were offered by the presenters that a traffic study had been completed on the intersection of Rochester and Scott Blvd and that existing volumes were well within allowances. I asked for a copy of this study, a nice young lady saying they were therefrom your office ask for my email and indicated I would get a copywithin a couple days. I've not received a copy nor a follow-up email, I did not get her business card so couldn't follow up. I would like a copy and will pay for it as I did for a long-range plan of the area North of Rochester now known as Monument Hills and Harvest Preserve in 1999. That report showed the subject property from Rochester North to Rawson Creek "not suitable" for development due to "unstable and steep" terrain!! I built this house on that basis. The current proposal more than doubles the density of the 2022 proposal and makes no adjustments to the street configuration to handle the additional traffic. Questions about traffic impact were brought up at the prior discussions also. Given there are 66 lots in the current Monument Hills development with; possibly, 1 (one!) appearing to be occasionally occupied the ACTUAL impact on Rochester traffic is unknown. Given the amount of large vehicle traffic into and out of Heron Drive for the 3 houses current under construction and watching their waiting times I saw the future. During these 25 years I've seen the traffic density continually increase to the current level of seeing cars stack up at times on Heron Circle to exit left (West) on Rochester and well as stack up making left turns onto Heron Circle. Our first surprise after moving in was how much traffic came and went on Heron. There are 39 single family houses served on these dead-end streets system with the average age well above 50 yr with many retired. Monument Hills has 66 lots and looking at a combination of terrain and general street shape it likely that as many as 50-55 will use Heron Drive. The number of "waits" could easily double, now add some percentage of the 100 new units! Second concern: Speeding! We now have a SIGNED crosswalk across Rochester from Heron Circle to Heron Drive. I dare you to come out and try to cross Rochester in this crosswalk from 3 -5 PM on a weekday. Attached is small speed study taken on a "quiet" yesterday afternoon. Speeds of 45-50 mph in this 35-mph speed limit are common. A couple days ago I clocked a 60 mph directly in front of the house. Don't take my word, talk with any family along Rochester. I've asked the city twice to put up a speed sensing and recording system. Guess where it was put - just East of Larch Lane. Third concern: Visibility. Attached are two photos taken a max of two seconds apart tonight standing in Heron Drive, facing East like I would if making a left turnout onto Rochester. Look very carefully at photo 1 just to the left of the utility pole you will see a faint yellow spot. Look at the second photo taken a maximum of 2 seconds later (per my Nikon D850 professional digital SLR that records in seconds). That post is 140-150 feet from the left curb of Heron Drive. Per the Iowa DOT Project TR-455, dated Nov. 2002 entitled "Handbook of Simplified Practice for Traffic Studies" the stopping distance for a normal vehicle traveling at 35 mph is 250 feet. A pedestrian not seeing this vehicle or the driver not seeing the pedestrian behind the 15 inch plus diameter of this 35-foot-tall utility pole in the foreground would probably result in severe injuries and possibly death. At the more common speed of 40 mph seen yesterday afternoon stopping distance becomes 305 feet - more than half the additional distance between the next pole to the East! At 45 mph its 360 feet! As you can see in the data, I clocked a car doing 55 mph in the short time I watched. This is more common than East bound because the visibility of the street forward to the 4-way stop at Scott is level and straight, plus there is no place for a radar trap. Coming from the other direction the cars have to accelerate the 564 feet from Scott to the utility pole I was using as the timing start point. Of course, that speed is the mathematical average speed across the 320-foot timing base. Exit speed could be significantly faster than the data shows and in many cases it was. Fourth concern: Traffic volume. Just in the hour and 40 minutes yesterday I recorded an average of 111 vehicles per hour. I'm confident I missed half because many times I was timing a West bound while many times more were traveling the opposite direction at the same time. Secondly, most of time I clocked only the first vehicle in the stream as I couldn't be sure the following one was either slowing or speeding up. Therefore, I'm pretty confident this rate is probably 1/2 of actual - on a quiet Saturday afternoon. We'll see what Tuesday and Wednesday show - if I have time. Understand you are busy so I can just pick up the studywhen it's ready. Advise primarily via text to 319-621- 3277 or reply to this email if not available until Tuesday or Wednesday. Larry Luebbert 3269 Rochester Avenue Iowa City, IA 52245 Late Correspondence From: Anne Russett Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 1:42 PM To: Madison Conley Subject: FW: REZ25-0007 Lot 56 Monument Hills Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged -----Original Message ----- From: Larry & Barbara Luebbert <lhluebbert@mchsi.com> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2025 11:24AM To: Anne Russett <ARussett@iowa-city.org> Subject: Re: REZ25-0007 Lot 56 Monument Hills ** This email originated outside of the City of Iowa City email system. Please take extra care opening any links or attachments. ** This message is from an external sender. Thanks for advising where to find the traffic study. I exited the June 6th meeting understanding there was a current study, this one is 2022. The traffic volume for the intersections of Heron Circle/Drive fairly compared to the informal calculation I did late afternoon last Thursday, I also clocked a vehicle doing 60 mph West bound that afternoon. However, the "heavy vehicles %" is no longer accurate - it is higher. For example, the Rochester Bus route now goes out past Scott, in 2022 I'm think it turned at Amhurst. Concrete trucks, gravel trucks, large semi's of earth moving equipment, etc are a regular occurrence all day and they are all going through the new crosswalk. Again only 3 houses are currently under construction and given the number of sold tags on the Monument Hills displays I expect this to double in the next year and last for at least 5 years. My laymen's brain is trying to understand the volume of statistics in this report. Especially how they came up with a Highway Capacity Model (HCM) value of 1355 veh/h West Bound in the data on Heron Circle/Heron Drive & Rochester Avenue. That calculates to 23 vehicles/min - a vehicle every 134 feet. Almost a vehicle every two seconds! There would be noway anyone could enter the flow. Did not see any measures of actual speeds as I sent with my email which would make the above even more concerning. Suspect the "HCM Lane LOS" rating relates theoretical to actual in some manner and a rating of B rather than A is meaningful. I've found the forms commonly used for these types of studies and will do some data gathering tomorrow and Wednesday has I have time and will bring to the Wednesday meeting. Will also be studying to get a better understanding of the statistics in this report. Yes, sharingwith the commission is definitely my intent. I'm also hearing a lot of neighborhood concerns about traffic density. That's why I'm trying to get a better understanding and have current data - not just opinions. Larry June 23, 1925 City Council 410 E Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52245 N c..r RE: REZ25-0007 Lot 66 Monument Hills — Public Safety Concerns This is a third effort to convey my lifelong obligation as a Registered Profession'7IF-rigir&r in the State of Missouri (El5800) to "Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the pmlic", the first fundamental Canon in the Code of Ethics of the Missouri statute. I am now retired and reside at 3269 Rochester Avenue (SE immediate corner of Heron Circle and Rochester Ave). My wife and I moved into this custom-built home in June 2000. During this period, vehicle traffic increased annually, while pedestrian and bicycle traffic, particularly families with small children both walking and bicycling, grew more rapidly than traffic after restaurants, especially an ice cream shop, opened at the SE of the Rochester/Scott Blvd intersection. The summary report presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission on June 18, 2025, did not address the following concerns: This report states it is updating the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the Rochester Corridor from the original study dated June 30, 2022. Digging deeper into this original study found that observation data for traffic flows and "sight distance" measures were performed about March 2, 2022. No data was taken relating to pedestrians, bicycle flow direction and volume or vehicle speeds in this 35-mph zone. The updated study states this TIS and sight distance data was not updated to reflect the physical conditions of May, 2025. Obviously, very early March would not be representative of walking and bicycling spanning the period from mid -March to mid -November. No speed data has been provided in either report, but a speed profile study on the afternoon of June 14th was supplied to staff at a meeting on the 17th. No one expressed surprise at speeds exceeding 50 mph in this 35-mph zone; look at photo #2. Assuming the sight distances were recorded at the same time as traffic count, the area viewed was a grassy field with an overgrown, brushy fence near Rochester's curb extending to Scott Blvd. This entire area has been extensively altered with the insertion of the Heron Drive roadbed and very large mounds of soil. This roadbed location required modifications of the overhead large electrical distribution lines via a much larger, taller pole (35 feet above ground) positioned 31/2 feet North of the Rochester curb and 6 1/2 feet East of the crosswalk concrete. Enclosed are a page image and photographs with explanations to further explain these concerns. Lawrence (Larry) H LuebbertJr. -: 3269 Rochester Ave Iowa City, IA 52245 • ,i. or�� n 1r1 (cell) 319-621-3277 Lh_Luab_bertmQhsj.corn r7T_ j - 7 ri Attachments: 1) Image of page 16-1 of the 2010 HCM discussing streets that have multiple travel modes. Newer versions of this HCM cost $450 and must be ordered, this version is downloadable from the Internet. The Iowa Dept of Transportation 2023-2024 "Iowa Bicycle Map" details a bicycle route from 1st Ave East to Scott. It crosses Scott to the North which goes through the crosswalk at the Rochester/Scott 4 way stop on approx. 2 miles to Dodge Street. Software supporting this HCM as well as references on the Internet by Toronto, Canada of the Synchro 11 software speak to processing these multiple street travel modes. Highway Capacity Manual 2010 - Ca I. INTRODUCTION Chapter 16, Urban Street Facilities, describes an integrated multimodal methodology for evaluating the quality of service provided to road users traveling along an urban street. An urban street is unique among road types because it typically serves multiple travel modes. Four of the more common urban street travel modes include automobile, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit. Travelers associated with each of these modes use different criteria to evaluate the service provided to them when they travel along an urban street. This integrated multimodal approach allows analysts to analyze urban streets from a "complete streets" perspective. VOLUME 3- 1 RUPTED FLOW 16. Urban t Facilities 17. Urban Street segments 18. Signalized Intersections 19. TWSC Intersections 20. AWSC Intersections 21. Roundabouts 22. Interchange Ramp Terminals 23. OFF -Street Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities The following photographs were taken with a professional Nikon digital camera (full frame 45 MP) had a lens set to 50mm to emulate the vision field of the human eye. 2) Photo #1, _SPT4853 - 9:05 AM, June 18, 2025, likely Regina High School track team out for morning training run. 3) Photo #2, _SPT4852 -10:49 AM, June 17, 2025, Look carefully at photo. How many seconds did it take you to see a pedestrian? The approximate distance is 150 feet. The US recom- mended design stopping distance at 35 mph is 250 feet, 40 mph - 305 feet, 45 mph - 360 feet! 4) Photo #3, _SPT4894 - Taken at 2:37 pm on June 23, 2025, on Allison Way, near the area where the street passes over a small stream. Lot #1 starts at about end of sidewalk on right of crosswalk sign. 5) Photo #4, _SPT4865 - 2:39 pm, June 23, 2025, approximately'/2 way up this 12% slope again looking South. A second raised crosswalk can now be seen at the top but seeing a vehicle coming is questionable. The crosswalk is near the boundary between lots 5 and 6. There are a total of 15 lots adjacent to this street, which has two crosswalks! An excellent example of construction that would significantly improve the crossing safety of pedestrian in photo #2. 6) Photo #5, _SPT4891 - 2:08 PM, June 23, 2025, standing on the crosswalk red pad looking East to estimate traffic distance and speed. The base diameter of this post at my eye level is approximately 14 inches. Wiring guards increase the vision blockage. 7) Photos #5 & 6 _SPT4849 and 4850 - 7:26 PM, June 15, 2025, standing in Heron Drive at about Location of a vehicle driver stopped before crossing East/West crosswalk lines. Yes, grass is high (about 37-40 inches), I can easily produce historical images of snow building up on the shoulder out front to 50+ inches after multiple plowings and drifting via strong North winds. i Hef {,may:`. -.. _ • �'-, - r _. � � •4. � Is . Now Now -a AEI' yp & P, rd -4 i 10, - _ r r � - �. ie. 4Y1irif •z ydr .. f -�''*f�•l.x`rai..-,•, • Y. �" �? ` �� low � •'�, .. � i l '': �A 1 w5� r �T •'.-. .: Y=• Y Item Number: 7.b. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution setting a public hearing on August 5, 2025 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the FY25 CDBG Fairmeadows Sidewalk Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Fiscal Impact: Staff Recommendation: Attachments: Resolution Josh Slattery — Senior Engineer Jason Havel — City Engineer Juli Seydell Johnson — Parks and Recreation Director Ron Knoche — Public Works Director Geoff Fruin — City Manager $94,000 available in the FY25 CDBG Fairmeadows Sidewalk Improvements account #S3989. Approval Executive Summary: This agenda item begins the bidding process for the FY25 CDBG Fairmeadows Sidewalk Improvements Project. This project generally includes the construction of 5-foot wide sidewalk around the cul-de-sac of Western Road, a 10-foot wide shared use path between Western Road and Union Road within Fairmeadows Park, and another 10-foot wide shared use path connecting the aforementioned shared use path with a 10-foot wide sidewalk along the parking lot in Fairmeadows Park, south of the Western Road cul-de-sac. Background / Analysis: The project is part of the City's Neighborhood Improvements Program, which utilizes Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. CDBG funds are designed to improve the quality of life for residents, particularly those with low -to -moderate income. The project is located in a CDBG-eligible area and was selected to increase connectivity and walkability near Grant Wood Elementary. Currently the existing sidewalks on Western Road and Union Road end at Fairmeadows Park. This project will extend the sidewalk on Western Road around the existing cul-de-sac and will provide a 10' wide shared use path connection through Fairmeadows Park between Union Road and Western Road. Project Timeline: Public Hearing / Approve Project Manual: August 5, 2025 Bid Letting: August 26, 2025 Contract Award: September 2, 2025 Construction: October 2025 to May 2026 7, b Prepare0 by: Josh Slattery. Engineering Division, 410 E. Washington St., loxes City, IA 52240, (319)3565149 Resolution No. 25-164 Resolution setting a public hearing on August 5, 2025 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the FY25 CDBG Fairmeadows Sidewalk Improvements Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the FY25 CDBG Fairmeadows Sidewalk Improvements account # 53989. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above -mentioned project is to be held on the 5" day of August, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harval Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above -named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above -named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this tSth day of July 12025 Mayor Approved by Attest: ( City Clerk City AttorrWs Office (Liz Craig - 07/02/2025) It was moved by Moe and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Salih the Resolution be Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Alter Bergus x Harmsen x Moe x Salih x Teague x Weilein Item Number: 7.c. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution setting a public hearing on August 5, 2025 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Iowa River Powerhouse Dam Repair Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Alin Dumachi — Senior Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel — City Engineer Ron Knoche — Public Works Director Geoff Fruin — City Manager Fiscal Impact: $675,000 available in the Iowa River Powerhouse Dam Repair Project account #W3328. Staff Recommendation: Approval Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item begins the bidding process for the Iowa River Powerhouse Dam Repair Project. This project generally includes concrete surface repairs to the upstream and downstream sections of the dam and pier footing repairs. Background / Analysis: A diving inspection of the Iowa River Powerhouse Dam conducted in 2021 identified a range of deterioration, from minor to moderate concrete surface defects in the dam and significant undermining of the pedestrian bridge pier. A follow-up diving inspection in November 2024 examined both the upstream and downstream portions of the dam to assess the progression of this deterioration. The 2024 inspection revealed a 60% increase in the number of defects compared to 2021, with most showing significant changes. Based on these findings, the dam is currently rated in fair condition. However, comprehensive repairs are necessary to extend the service life of the dam and pedestrian bridge piers. Project Timeline: Set Public Hearing — July 8, 2025 Hold Public Hearing — August 5, 2025 Bid Letting — August 28, 2025 Award Date — September 2, 2025 Construction — September 2025 to November 2026 Prepay by: Alin Dumachi. Engineering DiNsim, 410 E. Washington St., loves City. IA 52240, (319)3W5143 Resolution No. 75-165 Resolution setting a public hearing on August 5, 2025 on project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Iowa River Powerhouse Dam Repair Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said project manual on file for public inspection. Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Iowa River Powerhouse Dam Repair Project account #W3328. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: A public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost forthe construction of the above - mentioned project is to be held on the 5^ day of August, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice of the public hearing for the above -named project in a newspaper published at least once weekly and having a general circulation in the City, not less than four (4) nor more than twenty (20) days before said hearing. 3. A copy of the project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the above -named project is hereby ordered placed on file by the City Engineer in the office of the City Clerk for public inspection. Passed and approved this 8th day of July 2025, Mayi5ir Approved by L Attest: QS ` City Clerk City AttorrysOffice (Liz Craig — 07/03/2025) It was moved by Moe and seconded by adopted, and upon roll call there were: Salih the Resolution be Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Alter x Bergus x Harmsen Y Moe x Salih x Teague x Weilein �,A Prepared by: Susan Dulek, First Asst. City Atty., 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030 Resolution No. 25-166 Resolution setting a public hearing for August 5, 2025, to approve a purchase agreement with PJP Holdings, LLC for the eastern approximate one-half of Cutlot C in Iowa City Industrial Campus and to consider a proposal to convey said property. Whereas, Iowa City Industrial Campus is a shovel -ready parcel for industrial use located on 420" Street, which the City has been marketing since 2008; and Whereas, City staff has negotiated the attached purchase agreement, contingent on City Council approval, for the eastern approximate one-half of Outlot C (approximately 20 acres) to PJP Holdings, LLC for $1.25 per square feet; and Whereas, Outlot C will need to be re -subdivided into two or more lots, one lot of which will be the eastern approximate one-half to be conveyed to PJP Holdings, LLC; and Whereas, City Council should hold a public hearing on the proposed conveyance. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council does hereby declare its intent to convey the eastern approximate one- half of Outlot C in Iowa City Industrial Campus to PJP Holdings, LLC pursuant to the attached purchase agreement for $1.25 per square foot. 2. A public hearing on said proposed agreement should be and is hereby set for August 5, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in Emma J. Harvat Hall of City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa or 9 said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of public hearing to be published as provided by law. Passed and approved this 81h day of July, 2025. Mayor Approved by Attest: L��P ?J�V aC-ei City Clerk City Attome s Office (Sue Dulek — 07/02/2025) - Resolution No. 25-166 Page No. ? It was moved by Moe , and seconded by Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: g Alter Bergus x Harmsen Moe x % Salih x Teague g Weilein lih . that the REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO: City of Iowa City (Seller) PIP Holdings, I.I.C, an Ohio limited liability company (Buyer), hereby offers to buy. and the undersigned Seller, by its acceptance of this Agreement, agrees to sell approximately 20 acras (dimensions approximately 750 feet emwest and 11 192 fret north/south) of real property situaw in the moan approximate one-half of Outlet C, Iowa City Industrial Campus according ea the Corrected Final Plat thereof recorded in Book 63, No 42 Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, as generally depicted and identified as'9.nt 5" and "Lot 7' on the attached Exhibit A. together with all the Seller's right, title and interest in all buildings and improvements, if any, located on the above -described real estate, and subject to my casements and appurtenant servitudes for the benefit of the Seller, free and elm of all liens, encumbrances, reservations, exceptions and modifications, exceph for the Permitted Exceptions, as defined below. The entirety- of the above -described interests being conveyed shall hereinafter be relcred to as the -`Property". The final legal description for the Property shall be determined in accordance with Paragraph 12A below, and this Agreement amended accordingly at that time to include the final legal description of the property The Property shall be conveyed with good. clear and marketable title- subject to the following Permitted Exceptions: I. Zoning and building laws and ordinances; and 2. Covenants, restrictions, reservations and casements of record approved by Buyer. In consideration of the covenants and obligations contained herein. the Seller and Buyer a, ee as follows: 1. PLRCHASL PRICE. The Purchase Price for the Property shall be $1.25 per square foot, to be paid in full at the time of closing, all title objections being corrected to show marketable title. The final Purchase Price will not be known until the final survey legal description a completed as provided in Paragraph 12A below at which time the parties shall amend this Agreement m provide for the exact purchase Price. 2. R-ML ESTATE TAXES. Seller shall pay its prorated share, kissed upon the date orclosing, of the real estate taxes for the fiscal year in which closing occurs, due and payable in the 'subsequent fiscal veer, and all unpaid taxes for prior years. The amount shall be calculated based upon the assessed valuation, lesislm ve tax rollback and real estate tax exemptions that may be applicable to and used for the calculation of taxes payable in the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2024. If, at the time of closing, the tat rate has not been certified, then the mast current certified tax rate shall be used. Buyer shall be given a credit for such proration at closing. 3. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Seller shall pay all installments of special assessments which have been certified to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection before the Closing date. All charges for solid waste removal, sewage and maintenance that are attributable to Seller's Possession, including those fix which assessments arise after closing, shall be paid by Sellers. Any preliminary or deficiency assessment which cannot be discharged by payment shall be paid by Seller through en escrow account with sufficient funds to paysuch liens when payable, with any unused funds returned to Seller. 4. S'rATCS QUO M.AINTAiNED. The Property shall be preserved in its present condition and Seller shall deliver it intact at the time possession to the Buyer is given. All risk of loss or damage to the Property is on Seller until the Buyer takes possession. Prior to possession by the Buyer, Seller shall promptly give written notice to the Buyer of any loss or damage to the Property. In the event of lass, damage or destruction of all or part of the Property, the Buyer shall have the option to temrinae this Agreement effective immediately. Flowever, in the case of loss, damage or destruction of all err part of the Property from causes covered by insurance, the Buyer shall have the option hs either: (1) take possession of the Property and accept an assignment of all Buyer's right, title and interest in and to any claims Buyer has under the insurance policies covering the Property; or (2) terminate this Agreement effective immediately. Buyer shall be permitted to make a walk through inspection of the property prior to possession and closing, in order to determine that there has been an material change in the condition of the property except thane mutually agreed upon. 5. POSSESSION AND CLOSING. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to buyer at closing; possession of the Property shall be delivered nr Buyer within 30 days of the Iowa City City Council approving the re -subdivision of Dollar C, Industrial Campus, Iowa City, Iowa as described in Paragraph 12A below and after approval of title by Buyer's attomey. The parties agree to schedule a closing promptly after said subdivision is approved and all provisions of this Agreement have been satisfied. 6. ABSTRACT AND TITLE. Seller, at its expense, shall obtain an abstract of title to the Property continued through the City Council approval of the re -subdivision of Outlot C and deliver it to Buyer" attorney for examination within 5 days of the recording of the City Council resolution approving said to. subdivision. It shall show merchantable title in Seller in conformity with this Agreement, Iowa law, and 'fide Standards of the low& State Bar Association. The Seller shall make every reasonable effort to promptly perfect title. If closing is delayed due to Sellers inability to provide marketable tide, this Agreement shall continue in force and effect until either party rescinds the Agreement after giving ten days written notice to the other party. The abstract shall become die propery of Buyer when the purchase price is paid in full. Seller shall pay the costs of my additional abstracting and tide work due to any act or omission of Seller, including transfers by or the death of Seller or their assignees. In lieu of or in addition to the abstract review by an attomey, Buyer may elect to obtain an owil title insurance policy or a certificate from Iowa'I'itle Guaranty, in which case Buyer shall pay the cost thereof, however, Seller agrees to cooperate with any reasonable requirement imposed by the title company or Iowa Title Guaranty in connection with the issuance of such policy or certificate. 7. ENVIRONMENT.AL MATTERS. (a) Seller warrants to the best of its knowledge and belief that there are no abandoned wells, solid waste disposal riles, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks located on the Property, the Property does not "main levels of radon gat, asbestos or urea - formaldehyde fiction insulation which require remediation under current governmental standards, and Seller has done nothing to contaminate the Property with hazardous waste.% or substances. Seller warrants that the Property is not subject to any local. start, or federal judicial or administrative action, invrstigulion or order, as the case may be, imigin ne wells, solid waste disposal silos, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks. (b) Seller hereby grams the Buyer its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors, the right to enter upon the property at reasonable times upon reasonable notice, oral or written, from time to time for the purposes of investigating, inspecting and performing inventories of the Property, and to determine if there ame any environmental deficiencies, including hazardous materials, substances. conditions, or waste. The Buyer shall indemnify and hold harmless Seller from and against any and all expenses, claims, or losses arising from or in connection with any activities of the Buyer, its officers, agents, employees, or contractors on the Property prior to the Closing Date, including without limitation, any attorney's fees or court costs occasioned by such claims. The Buyer may notify Seller in writing of any such deficiency. Failure to do so shall be deemed a waiver of the Buyer's inspection and repair right%. In the event of any claim or demand by the Buyer as a result of inspections, Seller shall declare and commence one of the following options: (a) curing the deficiency, or (b) amending this agreement by giving the Buyer a credit for the cost of curing the deficiency, or (c) canceling this agreement. If prior to the Closing Date Seller does not promptly core all such deficiencies in a manner mutually agreeable to the Seller and Buyer, then the Buyer may declare this offer null and void. 8. DEED. Upon payment of die purchase price. Seller shall convey the Property to Buycr by Warranty Deed, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, and encumbrances except for Permitted Exceptions. General warranties oftitle shall extend to the time of delivery of the deed excepting liens or encumbrances suffered or permitted by Buyer. 9. REMEDIES OF THE PARTIES. A. If Byer fails to timely perform this Agreement, Seller may forfeit it as provided in the Iowa Code (Chapter 656). and all payments made shall he forfeited; or, at Seller's option, upon thirty days written notice ofintention to accelerate the payment of the entire balance because of Buyer's default (during which thirty days the default is not corrected), Seller may declare the entire balance immediately due and payable. Thereafter this agreement may be foreclosed in equity and the Court may appoint a receiver. B. If Seller fails to timely perform this .Agreement, Buyer has the right to have all payments made retumed to them. C. Buyer and Seller are also entitled to utilize any and all other remedies or actions at law or in equity available to them and shall be entitled to obtain judgment for costs and attorney fees as permitted by law. 10. NOTICE. Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed served when it is delivered by personal delivery or by certified mail return receipt requested, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: Seller: City of Iowa City, City Attorney, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, Iowa 52240; Buyer: 9005 Smith's Mill Road North, New Albany, Ohio 43054, Attn: Vert Bhindwallsm. It. GENERAL PROVISIONS. In the performance of each part of this Agreement, time shall be of the essence. Failure to promptly assert rights herein shall not, however, be a waiver of such rights or a waiver of any existing or subsequent default. This Agreement shall apply to and bind the successors in interest of the parties. This Agreement shall survive the during. Paragraph headings are for convenience of reference and shall not limit or affect the meaning of this Agreement. Words and phrases herein shall be construed as in the singular or plural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender according to the context. 12. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: A. FINAL PLAT (RE -SUBDIVISION OF OUTLOT C). Seller intends to prepare a Final Plat in order for the Iowa City City Council to m-subdivide the area known as Oudot C, Iowa City Industrial Campus, Iowa City. Iowa into two or more lots, one lot of which is generally depicted and identified as "Lot 5" and "Lot 7" on the attached Exhibit A. Seller shall provide a copy of this Final Plat depicting and describing the legal description of the Property to Buyer to be included in the deed for the Property. Seller will have the Final Plat recorded prior to closing. This Agreement is contingent upon Buyer approving the Final Plat and approving the final purchase price, and if not so approved, Buyer may declare this Agreement null and void and the earnest money shall be returned to Buyer. Seller anticipates it will take approximately 60 days from the date a complete Final Plat application is received by the City to the date the Final Plat is presented to the Iowa City City Council for approval. Seller will promptly take the necessary actions to submit the Final Plat application. B. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. This Agreement is subject to approval by the City Council of Iowa City. C. EARNEST MONEY. Buyer shall tender One Hundred Thousand Dollars IS 100,000.00) as camest money to be deposited in the trust account of Lcpic-Krueger Realtors within five (5) business days of execution ofthis Agreement. The earnest money shall be applied to the Purchase Price at closing in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and shall be delivered to Seller upon performance of Seller's obligations and satisfaction or waiver of Buyer's contingencies. The earnest money will be returned to Buyer if Buyer timely terminates this Agreement for any reason before the and of the Due Diligence Period. The balance of the Purchase Price shall be paid by Buyer at the time of closing. D. RAILROAD SPUR. Seller shall cooperate with, but will provide no financial assistance to. Buyer in the construction of the milmed and crossing from the existing spur, across 420's Street and into the Property. E. FARM TENANT/CROPS. OWlot C is subject to a farm lease with Phil Prybil. Seller shall anempt to negotiate a termination of said farm [case with the tenant effective on or before closing, and if Sella is unsuccessful in such negoliation, Seller shall provide the tenant with a written termination notice pursuant to Section 562.6 of the Iowa Code terminating said farm lease effective March 1, 2026, and provide Buyer a copy of said notice. Seller shall provide Buyer with a copy of such farm lease within 10 days of the execution ofthis Agreement. F. BROKER AND RFAL ESPA I'E AGENT COMMISSION. The Listing and Selling Agents/Broken arc agents of the parties hereto as outlined below, and their fiduciary duties of loyalty and faithfulness am owned to the party they represent: however, they must real the Other party with honesty and Fairness. Seller is represented by Jeff Edbura/Lepic Krueger, Realtors, and Buyer is represented by Mark Lynch of Skogre m Realty. Each Party hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the other harmless from and against any and all claims, causes ofactien, losses, damages, liabilities,judgments. settlements and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees) that the other may sustain or incur by reason of its breach of the foregoing representation and warranty. The provisions of this Section 13 shall survive the Closing or temtination ofthis Agreement. G. UTILITIES. Water and sanitary service are available along 420's Street, and Buyer shall extend water and sanitary service to the limits of the subdivision. Buyer shall be responsible for the tap on fees to the City of Iowa City water main (currently $539.42/aere) and City of Iowa City sewer (carremly $1,698.18.'acre). Buyer shall he responsible for providing gas, electricity, phone, f fiber, and cable to the Property. H. STORMWATER MANAOEMENI. Buyer shall be responsible for storm water management as regulated by the Iowa City City Code - I. CERIlFICATION. Seller certifies that it is not acting, directly or indirectly, for or on behalfofany person, group, entity or nation named by any Executive Order or the United States Treasury Department as a terrorist. "Specially Designated National and Blocked Person" or any other banned or blocked person, entity, nation or transaction pursuant to any law, order, rule of regulation that is enforced Or administered by the Office Of Foreign Assets Control; and are trot engaged in this transaction, directly or indirectly on behalf LA any Such person, group, entity or nation. Seller hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and held harmless the Buyer from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, risks, liabilities and expenses (including attomey''s fees and costs) arising fiom or related to any breach of the foregoing certification. J. BUYER'S DUE DILIGENCE. This Agreement is contingent upon Buyer's satisfactory (to Buyer) due diligence investigation into Buyer's development plans and was associated with the subject property to be completed within 45 days of execution of this Agreement ("Due Diligence Period'). During the Due Diligence Period, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property. Buyer's investigation includes, but is not limited to, undertaking sell tests and environmental studiesithin 10 days of execution of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer will any existing site . W reports of studies, title work, environmental reports, all information relating to soil bongs, easements, andf this cy not been eleased within 10 days of ration Ofthe Due Diligence Period, he location Of leitherities 1party may tdeclare his Agreement null and void and the camettmoney shall Ise returned to Buyer. 13, ACCEPTANCE. When accepted, this Agreement shall became a binding contract. � This Offer is presented to the Seller On this r� day of ..2025. PdP HOLDINGS, LLC, as Buyer BY Name: min/ RH[�CtIRI,L� Accepted this day of �+2025.. �CITY OF IOWA CITY, as Seller By: GeoffFruin, City Manager 4748 420th St, Iowa City, Iowa City Iowa 9.2 - 75.5 Acre Commercial Lots for Sale Item Number: 7.d. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution setting a public hearing for August 5, 2025, to approve a purchase agreement with PJP Holdings, LLC for the eastern approximate one-half of Outlot C in Iowa City Industrial Campus and to consider a proposal to convey said property. Prepared By: Susan Dulek, First Ass't. City Attorney Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The final sale amount is subject to future platting. The price of $1.25 per square foot. Staff estimates the final sale price to be approximately $1,089,000 (assuming 20 acres). Staff Recommendation: Approval Commission Recommendations: N/A Attachments: Resolution Purchase Agreement Executive Summary: Iowa City Industrial Campus is a shovel -ready parcel for industrial use located on 420th Street. City staff has negotiated a purchase agreement, contingent on City Council approval, for the eastern approximate one-half of Outlot C (approximately 20 acres) to PJP Holdings, LLC for $1.25 per square foot. This resolution sets a public hearing for Aug. 5 on the proposed conveyance. Background / Analysis: For approximately fifteen years, the City has owned and marketed industrial property in in the 420th Street corridor. The City bought the property and invested in utility, roadway and railroad infrastructure in an attempt to expand our industrial sector, protect and add employment opportunities, and increase our tax base for the benefit of the entire community. The City has approximately forty acres remaining for sale and this agreement is expected to result in the sale of approximately twenty of those acres. Outlot C will need to be re - subdivided to create a lot consisting of the eastern approximate one-half of Outlot C. The sale of the land is to PJP Holdings, based out of Ohio. PJP is expected to build a rail - served facility that will operate in the packaging industry and serve local and regional customers including Procter & Gamble here in Iowa City. The sale of this land and construction of the manufacturing facility will expand the City's tax base, boost local employment, and further benefit existing employers in the region. Prepared by: Susan Dulek, First Asst. City Atty., 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030 Resolution No. Resolution setting a public hearing for August 5, 2025, to approve a purchase agreement with PJP Holdings, LLC for the eastern approximate one-half of Outlot C in Iowa City Industrial Campus and to consider a proposal to convey said property. Whereas, Iowa City Industrial Campus is a shovel -ready parcel for industrial use located on 4201" Street, which the City has been marketing since 2008; and Whereas, City staff has negotiated the attached purchase agreement, contingent on City Council approval, for the eastern approximate one-half of Outlot C (approximately 20 acres) to PJP Holdings, LLC for $1.25 per square feet; and Whereas, Outlot C will need to be re -subdivided into two or more lots, one lot of which will be the eastern approximate one-half to be conveyed to PJP Holdings, LLC; and Whereas, City Council should hold a public hearing on the proposed conveyance. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council does hereby declare its intent to convey the eastern approximate one- half of Outlot C in Iowa City Industrial Campus to PJP Holdings, LLC pursuant to the attached purchase agreement for $1.25 per square foot. 2. A public hearing on said proposed agreement should be and is hereby set for August 5, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. in Emma J. Harvat Hall of City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of public hearing to be published as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of July, 2025. Attest: City Clerk Mayor Approved by City Attorney's Office REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO: City of Iowa City (Seller) PJP holdings, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (Buyer), hereby offers to buy, and the undersigned Seller, by its acceptance of this Agreement, agrees to sell approximately 20 acres (dimensions approximately 750 feet eastlwest and 1.192 feet northfsouth) of real property situated in the eastern approximate one -hall- ol' Outlot C, Iowa City Industrial Campus according to the Corrected Final Plat thereof recorded in Book 63, Page 42 Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa, as generally depicted and identified as "Lot 5" and "Lot 7" on the attached Exhibit A, together with all the Seller's right, title and interest in all buildings and improvements, if any, located on the above -described real estate, and subject to any casements and appurtenant servitudes for the benefit of the Seller, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, reservations, exceptions and modifications, except for the Permitted Exceptions, as defined below. The entirety of the above -described interests being conveyed shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Property". The final legal description for the Property shall be determined in accordance with Paragraph 12A below, and this Agreement amended accordingly at that time to include the final legal description of the Property The Property shall be conveyed with good, clear and marketable title, subject to the following Permitted Exceptions,- 1. Zoning and building laws and ordinances; and 2_ Covenants, restrictions, reservations and casements of record approved by Buyer. in consideration of the covenants and obligations contained herein, the Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1. PURCHASL PRICE. The Purchase Price for the Property shall be $1.25 per square foot, to be paid in full at the time of closing, all title objections being corrected to show marketable title. The final Purchase Price will not be known until the final survey legal description is completed as provided in Paragraph 12A below at which time the parties shall amend this Agreement to provide for the exact Purchase Price. 2. REAL ESTATE TAXES. Seller shall pay its prorated share, based upon the date of closing, of the real estate taxes for the fiscal year in which closing occurs, due and payable in the subsequent fiscal year, and all unpaid taxes for prior years. The amount shall be calculated based upon the assessed valuation, legislative tax rollback and real estate tax exemptions that may be applicable to and used for the calculation of taxes payable in the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2024. If, at the time of closing, the tax rate has not been certified, then the most current certified tax rate shall be used. Buyer shall be given a credit for such proration at closing. 3. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Seller shall pay all installments of special assessments which have been certified to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection before the Closing date. All charges for solid waste removal, sewage and maintenance that are attributable to Seller's possession, including those for which assessments arise after closing, shall be paid by Sellers. Any preliminary or deficiency assessment which cannot be discharged by payment shall be paid by Seller through an escrow account with sufficient funds to pay such liens when payable, with any unused funds returned to Seller. 4. STATUS QUO MAINTAINED. The Property shall be preserved in its present condition and Seller shall deliver it intact at the time possession to the Buyer is given. All risk of loss or damage to the Property is on Seller until the Buyer takes possession. Prior to possession by the Buyer; Seller shall promptly give written notice to the Buyer of any loss or damage to the Property. In the event of loss, damage or destruction of all or part of the Property, the Buyer shall have the option to terminate this Agreement effective irnrnediately. However, in the case of loss, damage or destruction of all or part of the Property from causes covered by insurance, the Buyer shall have the option to either: (1) take possession of the Property and accept an assignment of all Buyer`s right, title and interest in and to any claims Buyer has wider the insurance policies covering the Property; or (2) terminate this Agreement effective immediately. Buyer shall be permitted to make a walk through inspection of the property prior to possession and closing, in order to determine that there has been no material change in the condition of the property except those mutually agreed upon. 5. POSSESSION AND CLOSING. Possession of the Property shall be delivered to buver at closing; possession of the Property shall be delivered to Buyer within 30 days of the Iowa City City Council approving the re -subdivision of Outlot C, Industrial Campus, Iowa City, Iowa as described in Paragraph 12A below and after approval of title by Buyer's attorney. The parties agree to schedule a closing promptly after said subdivision is approved and all provisions of this Agreement have been satisfied. 6, ABSTRACT AND TITLE. Seller, at its expense, shall obtain an abstract of title to the Property continued through the City Council approval of the re -subdivision of Outlot C and deliver it to Buyer's attorney for examination within 5 days of the recording of the City Council resolution approving said re - subdivision. It shall show merchantable title in Seller in conformity with this Agreement, Iowa law, and Title Standards of the Iowa State Bar Association. The Seller shall make every reasonable effort to promptly perfect title. If closing is delayed due to Sellers inability to provide marketable title. this Agreement shall continue in force and effect until either party rescinds the Agreement after giving ten days written notice to the other party. The abstract shall become the property of Buyer when the purchase price is paid in full. Seller shall pay the costs of any additional abstracting and title work due to any act or omission of Seller, including transfers by or the death of Seller or their assignees. in lieu of or in addition to the abstract review by an attorney, Buyer may elect to obtain an owner's title insurance policy or a certificate from Iowa Title Guaranty, in which case Buyer shall pay the cost thereof: however, Seller agrees to cooperate with any reasonable requirement imposed by the title company or Iowa Title Guaranty in connection with the issuance of such policy or certificate. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL, MATTERS. (a) Seller warrants to the best of its knowledge and belief that there are no abandoned wells, solid waste disposal sites, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks located on the Property, the Property does not contain levels of radon gas, asbestos or urea - formaldehyde foam insulation which require remediation under current governmental standards, and Seller has done nothing to contaminate the Property with hazardous wastes or substances. Seller warrants that the Property is not subject to any local; state, or federal judicial or administrative action, investigation or order, as the case may be, regarding wells, solid waste disposal sites, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks. (b) Seller hereby grants the Buyer its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors, the right to enter upon the Property at reasonable times upon reasonable notice, oral or written, from time to time for the purposes of investigating; inspecting and performing inventories of the Property and to determine if there are any environmental deficiencies; including hazardous materials, substances, conditions, or waste. The Buyer shall indemnifti• and hold harmless Seller from and against any and all expenses, claims, or Iosses arising from or in connection with any activities of the Buyer, its officers, agents, employees, or contractors on the Property prior to the Closing Date, including without limitation, any attorney's fees or court costs occasioned by such claims. The Buyer may notify Seller in writing of any such deficiency. Failure to do so shall be deemed a waiver of the Buyer's inspection and repair rights. In the event of any claim or demand by the Buyer as a result of inspections, Seller shall declare and commence one of the following options: (a) curing the deficiency, or (b) amending this agreement by giving the Buyer a credit for the cost of curing the deficiency, or (c) canceling this agreement. If prior to the Closing Date Seller does not promptly cure all such deficiencies in a manner mutually agreeable to the Seller and Buyer, then the Buyer may declare this offer null and void. 8. DEED. Upon payment of the purchase price, Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer by Warranty Deed, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, and encumbrances except for Permitted Exceptions. General warranties of title shall extend to the time of delivery of the deed excepting liens or encumbrances suffered or permitted by Buyer. 9. REMEDIES OF THE PARTIES. A. If Buyer fails to timely perform this Agreement, Seller may forfeit it as provided in the Iowa Code (Chapter 656). and all payments made shall be forfeited; or, at Seller's option, upon thirty days written notice of intention to accelerate the payment of the entire balance because of Buyer's default (during which thirty days the default is not corrected), Seller may declare the entire balance immediately due and payable. Thereafter this agreement may be foreclosed in equity and the Court may appoint a receiver. B. If Seller I'ails to timely perform this Agreement, Buyer has the right to have all payments made returned to them. C. Buyer and Seller are also entitled to utilize any and all other remedies or actions at law or in equity available to them and shall be entitled to obtain judgment for costs and attorney fees as permitted by law. 10. NOTICE- Anv notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed served when it is delivered by personal delivery or by certified mail return receipt requested, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: Seller: City of Iowa City, City Attorney, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, Iowa 52240; Buyer: 9005 Smith's Mill Road North, New Albany, Ohio 43054, Attn: Ven Bhindivallam. 11. GENERAL PROVISIONS. In the performance of each part of this Agreement, time shall be of the essence. Failure to promptly assert rights herein shall not, however, be a waiver of such rights or a waiver of any existing or subsequent default. This Agreement shall apply to and bind the successors in interest of the parties. This Agreement shall survive the closing. Paragraph headings are for convenience of reference and shall not limit or affect the meaning of this Agreement. Words and phrases herein shall be construed as in the singular or plural number, and as masculine. feminine or neuter gender according to the context. 12. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: A. FINAL PLAT (RE -SUBDIVISION OF OUT'LOT C). Seller intends to prepare a Final Plat in order for the Iowa City City Council to re -subdivide the area known as Outlot C, Iowa City Industrial Campus, Iowa City, Iowa into two or more lots, one lot of which is generally depicted and identified as "Lot 5" and `Lot 7" on the attached Exhibit A. Seller shall provide a copy of this Final Plat depicting and describing the legal description of the Property to Buyer to be included in the deed for the Property. Seller will have the Final Plat recorded prior to closing. This Agreement is contingent upon Buyer approving the Final Plat and approving the final purchase price, and if not so approved, Buyer may declare this Agreement null and void and the earnest money shall be returned to Buyer. Seller anticipates it will take approximately 60 days from the date a complete Final Plat application is received by the City to the date the Final Plat is presented to the Iowa City City Council for approval. Seller will promptly take the necessary actions to submit the Final Plat application. B. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. This Agreement is subject to approval by the City Council of Iowa City. C. FARNEST MONEY. Buyer shall tender One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) as earnest money to be deposited in the trust account of Lepie-Kroeger Realtors within five (5) business days of execution of this Agreement. The earnest money shall be applied to the Purchase Price at closing in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and shall be delivered to Seller upon performance of Seller's obligations and satisfaction or waiver of Buyer's contingencies. The earnest money wili be returned to Buyer if Buyer timely terminates this Agreement for any reason before the end of the Due Diligence Period. The balance of the Purchase Price shall be paid by Buyer at the time of closing. D. RAILROAD SPUR. Seller shall cooperate with, but will provide no financial assistance to, Buyer in the construction of the railroad and crossing from the existing spur, across 420`h Street and into the Property. E. FARM TENANT/CROPS. Outlot C is subject to a farm lease with Phil Prybil. Seller shall attempt to negotiate a termination of said farm lease with the tenant effective on or before closing, and if Seller is unsuccessful in such negotiation, Seller shall provide the tenant with a written tennination notice pursuant to Section 562.6 of the Iowa Code terminating said farm lease effective March 1, 2026, and provide Buyer a copy of said notice. Seller shall provide Buyer with a copy of such farm lease within 10 days of the execution of this Agreement. F. BROKFR AND REAL ESTATE AGENT COMMISSION. The Listing and Selling Agents/Brokers are agents of the parties hereto as outlined below, and their fiduciary duties of loyalty and faithfulness are owned to the party they represent: however, they must treat the other party with honesty and fairness. Seller is represented by Jeff Edburg/Lepic Kroeger, Realtors, and Buyer is represented by Mark Lynch of Skogman Realty. Each Parh, hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the other harmless from and against any and all claims, causes of action, losses, damages, liabilities, judgments, settlements and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees) that the other may sustain or incur by reason of its breach of the foregoing representation and warranty. The provisions of this Section 13 shall survive the Closing or termination of this Agreement. G. UTILITIES. Water and sanitary service are available along 420" Street, and Buyer shall extend water and sanitary service to the limits of the subdivision. Buyer shall be responsible for the tap on fees to the City of lowa City water main (currently $539.42/acre) and City of Iowa City sewer (currently $1,698.18,'acre). Buyer shall be responsible for providing gas, electricity, phone; liber, and cable to the Property. 14. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT. Buyer shall be responsible for storm water management as regulated by the Iowa City City Code. 1. CERTIFICATION. Seller certifies that it is riot acting, directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of any person, group, entity or nation named by any Executive Order or the United States Treasury Department as a terrorist, "Specially Designated National and Blocked Person" or any other banned or blocked person, entity, nation or transaction pursuant to any law, order, rule or regulation that is enforced or administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control; and are not engaged in this transaction, directly or indirectly on behalf of", any such person, group, entity or nation. Seller hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Buyer from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, risks, liabilities and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs) arising from or related to any breach of the foregoing certification. J. BUYER'S DUE DILIGENCE. This Agreement is contingent upon Buyer's satisfactory (to Buyer) due diligence investigation into Buyer's development plans and costs associated with the subject property to be completed within 45 days of execution of this Agreement ("Due Diligence Period"). During the Due Diligence Period, Seller shall provide Buyer with reasonable access to the Property. Buyer's investigation includes, but is not limited to, undertaking soil tests and environmental studies. Within 10 days of execution of this Agreement, Seller shall provide Buyer will any existing site reports or studies, title work, environmental reports, all information relating to soil borings, easements, and the location of utilities. If this contingency has not been released within 10 days of expiration of the Due Diligence Period, either party may declare this Agreement null and void and the earnest money shall be returned to Buyer. 13. ACCEPTANCE. When accepted, this Agreement shall become a binding contract. This Offer is presented to the Seller on this CX day of IG(,It1Q 2025. PJP HOLDINGS, LLC, as Buyer BY: Name: 8f1!�kG[lI Accepted this day of . 2025.. CITY OF IOW, CITY, as Seller By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager 4748 420th St, Iowa City, Iowa City Iowa 9.2 - 75.5 Acre Commercial Lots for Sale C UIN•I. SIOR � 7 - W[ LKR 144 Lepic-Kroeger. RCr1ESOR-SO ww% .lepickrveger.com Item Number: 7.e. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution setting a public hearing for August 5, 2025 on a proposal to convey Lot 10, Lindemann Subdivision - Part Eight located on Kenneth Drive. Prepared By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood & Development Services Director Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Susan Dulek, First Ass't. City Attorney Fiscal Impact: City will use budgeted Opportunity Funds of $270,000 as a grant to DVIP for the land acquisition costs. There will be no impact on the general fund for ongoing operational expenses. Staff Recommendation: Approval Commission Recommendations: NA Attachments: Purchase Agreement Resolution Executive Summary: On July 8, 2025, City Council will be asked to set a public hearing for August 5, 2025, to consider a resolution authorizing the conveyance of Lot 10, Lindemann Subdivision - Part Eight (located at the intersection of Kenneth Dr. and York Place) to the Domestic Violence Intervention Program (DVIP). Up to six townhomes can be constructed on the lot. The proposed conveyance supports a partnership between the City and DVIP to develop affordable housing for individuals and families fleeing domestic violence. In 2024, DVIP was awarded $2,488,733 in HOME -American Rescue Plan (HOME -ARP) funds from the Iowa Finance Authority (IFA) to construct and operate six townhomes on the Kenneth Drive lot. The grant also includes funding for supportive services and operational costs. Background / Analysis: The City originally acquired the Kenneth Drive lot in 2018 using former land banking funds to preserve opportunities for future affordable housing development. Over several years, various development concepts were considered, but none advanced to implementation. Up to six townhomes may be constructed on the lot. In 2021 the HOME American Rescue Plan (HOME -ARP) program was created as part of the American Rescue Plan Act to address homelessness and related needs resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2024, the Iowa Finance Authority (IFA) announced a competitive HOME -ARP funding round, allocating $3.7 million statewide. The City partnered with DVIP on a successful application, committing to contribute the land, assessed at $270,000, toward the required 25% project match. City Contribution and Agreement Terms In February 2024, Council authorized the City Manager to execute a grant agreement for $270,000 in Affordable Housing Funds contingent on DVIP's receipt of HOME -ARP funds. The agreement will provide: • A conditional occupancy loan, at 0% interest, of $270,000 (the land value); • A 20-year affordability period. The loan is forgiven if compliance is maintained; • A requirement that DVIP maintain affordable rents for households earning at or below 60% of area median income; and • A mortgage on the property to secure compliance throughout the affordability period. Once DVIP executes a grant agreement with IFA, the City will proceed with closing and convey the lot to DVIP. PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO: City of Iowa City, Iowa (Seller) Domestic Violence Intervention Program ("Buyer") hereby offers to buy, and the undersigned Seller, by its acceptance of this Agreement, agrees to sell the real property situated in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, locally known as Lot 10, Lindemann Subdivision -Part Eight, Iowa City, Iowa, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 62, Page 200, Plat Records of Johnson County, Iowa together with all the Seller's right, title and interest in all buildings and improvements, if any located on the above -described real estate, and subject to any easements and appurtenant servitudes for the benefit of the Seller, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, reservations, exceptions and modifications, except for the Permitted Exceptions, as defined below. The entirety of the above -described interests being conveyed shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Property". The Property shall be conveyed with good, clear and marketable title, subject to the following Permitted Exceptions: 1. Zoning and building laws and ordinances; and 2. covenants, restrictions, reservations and easements of record approved by Buyer. In consideration of the covenants and obligations contained herein, the Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1. PURCHASE PRICE. The Purchase Price for the Property shall be $270,000, to be paid in full at the time of closing, all title objections being corrected to show marketable title. 2. REAL ESTATE TAXES. Seller shall pay the prorated share, based upon the date of closing, of the real estate taxes for the fiscal year in which closing occurs, due and payable in the subsequent fiscal year, and all unpaid taxes for prior years. The amount shall be calculated based upon the assessed valuation, legislative tax rollback and real estate tax exemptions that may be applicable to and used for the calculation of taxes payable in the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2024. If, at the time of closing, the tax rate has not been certified, then the most current certified tax rate shall be used. 3. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Seller shall pay all installments of special assessments which have been certified to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection before the Closing date. All charges for solid waste removal, sewage and maintenance that are attributable to Seller's possession, including those for which assessments arise after closing, shall be paid by Buyer. Any preliminary or deficiency assessment which cannot be discharged by payment shall be paid by Buyer through an escrow account with sufficient funds to pay such liens when payable, with any unused hands returned to Buyer. 4. RISK OF LOSS AND INSURANCE. Seller shall bear the risk of loss or damage to the Property prior to closing or possession, whichever first occurs. Seller agrees to maintain existing insurance until closing or possession, whichever first occurs. Buyer may also insure the Property prior to closing or possession. The Property shall be preserved in its present condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and Seller shall deliver it intact at the time the Buyer takes possession: Prior to the Buyer taking possession, Seller shall promptly give written notice to the Buyer of any loss or damage to the Property. In the event of loss, damage or destruction of all or part of the Property, the Buyer shall have the option to terminate this Agreement effective immediately. However, in the case of loss, damage or destruction of all or part of the Property from causes covered by insurance, the Bayer shall have the option to either 1) take possession of the Property and accept an assignment of all Seller's right, title and interest in and to any claims Seller has under the insurance policies covering the Property; or 2) terminate this Agreement effective immediately. 5. POSSESSION AND CLOSING. If Seller timely performs all obligations, possession of the Property shall be delivered to Buyer within six (6) months following the IFA HOME round closing, which the parties estimate to be September 1, 2024, and any adjustments of rent, insurance, taxes, interest and all charges attributable to the Seller's possession shall be made as of the date of. closing. Closing shall occur after approval of title by Buyer's attorney and vacation of the Property by Seller. Seller agrees to permit Buyer to inspect the Property within 48 hours prior to closing to assure that the premises are in the condition required by this Agreement. If possession is given on a day other than closing, the parties shall make a separate agreement with adjustments as of the date of possession. 6. FIXTURES. Included with the Property shall be all fixtures that integrally belong to, are specifically adapted to or are a part of the real estate, whether attached or detached, such as: fencing, gates, bushes, trees, shrubs and plants. 7. ABSTRACT AND TITLE. Seller, at its expense, shall promptly obtain an abstract of title to the Property continued through the date of acceptance of this Agreement, and deliver it to Buyer's attorney for examination. It shall show merchantable title in Seller in conformity with this Agreement, Iowa law, and Title Standards of the Iowa State Bar Association. The Seller shall make every reasonable effort to promptly perfect title. If closing is delayed due to Seller's inability to provide marketable title, this Agreement shall continue in force and effect until either party rescinds the Agreement after giving ten days written notice to the other party. The abstract shall become the property of Buyer when the purchase price is paid in full. Seller shall pay the costs of any additional abstracting and title work due to any act or omission of Seller, including transfers by or the death of Seller or their assignees. 8. SURVEY. Buyer, at Buyer's expense, may have the Property surveyed and certified by a Registered Land Surveyor. If the survey shows any encroachment on the Property or if any improvements located on the Property encroach on lands of others, the encroachments shall be treated as a title defect. If the survey is required under Chapter 354, Buyer shall pay the cost thereof. 9. ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. (a) Seller warrants to the best of its knowledge and belief that there are no abandoned wells, solid waste disposal sites, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks located on the Property, the Property does not contain levels of radon gas, asbestos or urea - formaldehyde foam insulation which require remediation under current governmental standards, and Seller has done nothing to contaminate the Property with hazardous wastes or substances. Seller warrants that the Property is not subject to any local, state, or federal judicial or administrative action, investigation or order, as the case may be, regarding wells, solid waste disposal sites, hazardous wastes or substances, or underground storage tanks. (b) Buyer may, at its expense, within 10 days after the date of acceptance, obtain a report from a qualified engineer or other person qualified to analyze the existence or nature of any hazardous materials, substances, conditions or wastes located on the Property. In the event any hazardous materials, substances, conditions or wastes are discovered on the Property and the cost to remove them is in excess of $5,000.00, Buyer shall have the option to terminate this Agreement effective immediately. In the event the cost to remove the hazardous materials, substances, conditions or wastes on the Property is $5,000.00 or less, the cost to remove them shall be borne solely by Buyer. 10. DEED. Upon payment of the purchase price, Seller shall convey the Property to Buyer by Warranty Deed, free and clear of all liens, restrictions, and encumbrances except as provided in this Agreement. General warranties of title shall extend to the time of delivery of the deed excepting liens or encumbrances suffered or permitted by Buyer, 11. USE OF PURCHASE PRICE. At time of settlement, funds of the purchase price may be used to pay taxes and other liens and to acquire outstanding interests, if any, of others. 12. REMEDIES OF THE PARTIES. A. If Buyer fails to timely perform this Agreement, Seller may forfeit it as provided in the Iowa Code (Chapter 656), and all payments made shall be forfeited; or, at Seller's option, upon thirty days written notice of intention to accelerate the payment of the entire balance because of Buyer's default (during which thirty days the default is not corrected), Seller may declare the entire balance immediately due and payable. Thereafter this agreement may be foreclosed in equity and the Court may appoint a receiver. B. If Seller fails to timely perform this Agreement, Buyer has the right to have all payments made returned to them. C. Buyer and Seller are also entitled to utilize any and all other remedies or actions at law or in equity available to them and shall be entitled to obtain judgment for costs and attorney fees as permitted by law. 13. NOTICE. Any notice under this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed served when it is delivered by personal delivery or by certified mail return receipt requested, addressed to the parties at the following addresses. Seller, City of Iowa City, City Clerk, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, Iowa 52240; Buyer, DVIP, 1105 S. Gilbert Ct., Iowa City, IA 52240. 14. GENERAL PROVISIONS. In the performance of each part of this Agreement, time shall be of the essence. Failure to promptly assert rights herein shall not, however, be a waiver of such rights or a waiver of any existing or subsequent default. This Agreement shall apply to and bind the successors in interest of the parties. This Agreement shall survive the closing. Paragraph headings are for convenience of reference and shall not limit or affect the meaning of this Agreement. Words and phrases herein shall be construed as in the singular or plural number, and as masculine, feminine or neuter gender according to the context. 15. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. This agreement is subject to approval by the City Council of Iowa City as required by Section 364.7 of the Code of Iowa. 16. FINANCING. This Agreement is subject to Buyer obtaining State HOME ARP funding and additional financing on terms acceptable to Buyer. 17, AFFORDABLE HOUSING. This Agreement is subject to Buyer signing an agreement with Seller, which is secured by a mortgage, that requires the Property to be used exclusively for affordable housing for a period of twenty (20) years. Said agreement will further provide the maximum income limits of the occupants and how rent will be established. Buyer shall construct a minimum of four affordable housing units on the Property and obtain a certificate of occupancy for said units within two years of closing. 19. CERTIFICATION. Buyer and Seller certify that they are not acting, directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of any person, group, entity or nation named by any Executive Order or the United States Treasury Department as a terrorist, "Specially Designated National and Blocked Person" or any other banned or blocked person, entity, nation or transaction pursuant to any law, order, rule or regulation that is enforced or administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control; and are not engaged in this transaction, directly or indirectly on behalf of, any such person, group, entity or nation. Each party hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, risks, liabilities and expenses (including attorney's fees and costs) arising from or related to any breach of the foregoing certification. 19. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS: (Put "NIA" below if there are no additional provisions.) 20. ACCEPTANCE. When accepted, this Agreement shall become a binding contract. If not accepted and delivered to Seller on or before February 20, 2023 at 5:00 pm, this Agreement shall be null and void and all payments made shall be returned immediately to Buyer. This Offer is presented to the Seller on February 19, 2024. BUYER BY: Kristie Fortmann-Doser, Executive Director Accepted this /f % day of February, 2024. Geoff F in City Manager (SELLER) Prepared by: Tracy Hights hoe, NDS Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5244 Resolution No. Resolution setting a public hearing for August 5, 2025 on a proposal to convey Lot 10, Lindemann Subdivision - Part Eight located on Kenneth Drive. Whereas, the HOME -ARP program was created to address homelessness and related needs related from the COVID-19 pandemic; and Whereas, the Iowa Finance Authority awarded the Domestic Violence Intervention Program, Inc. (DVIP) $2,488,733 in HOME -ARP funds to develop and manage up to six units of affordable housing for those individuals and families fleeing domestic violence; and Whereas, the City purchased the vacant lot on Kenneth Drive with former land banking funds for a future affordable housing opportunity; and Whereas, City staff has negotiated a purchase agreement for the sale of the lot to DVIP for $270,000 contingent of City Council approval; and Whereas, this sale would provide affordable rental housing to individuals and families fleeing domestic violence for a period of 20 years; and Whereas, this sale is conditioned on DVIP entering a HOME -ARP agreement with the Iowa Finance Authority for development, support services and operations funding to support up to six housing units. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council does hereby declare its intent to convey Lot 10, Lindemann Subdivision - Part Eight for the sum of $270,000. 2. A public hearing on said proposal should be and is hereby set for August 5, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in Emma J. Harvat Hall of the Iowa City City Hall, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be published as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of July, 2025. Mayor Approved by: City Attorney's Office Attest: City Clerk Prepared by: Tracy Hightshoe, NDS Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5244 Resolution No. 25-167 Resolution setting a public hearing for August 5, 2025 on a proposal to convey Lot 10, Lindemann Subdivision - Part Eight located on Kenneth Drive. Whereas, the HOME -ARP program was created to address homelessness and related needs related from the COVID-19 pandemic; and Whereas, the Iowa Finance Authority awarded the Domestic Violence Intervention Program, Inc. (DVIP) $2,488,733 in HOME -ARP funds to develop and manage up to six units of affordable housing for those individuals and families Fleeing domestic violence; and Whereas, the City purchased the vacant lot on Kenneth Drive with former land banking funds for a future affordable housing opportunity; and Whereas, City staff has negotiated a purchase agreement for the sale of the lot to DVIP for $270,000 contingent of City Council approval; and Whereas, this sale would provide affordable rental housing to individuals and families Fleeing domestic violence for a period of 20 years; and Whereas, this sale is conditioned on DVIP entering a HOME -ARP agreement with the Iowa Finance Authority for development, support services and operations funding to support up to six housing units. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The City Council does hereby declare its intent to convey Lot 10, Lindemann Subdivision - Part Eight for the sum of $270.000. 2. A public hearing on said proposal should be and is hereby set for August 5, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in Emma J. Harvat Hall of the Iowa City City Hall, 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be published as provided by law. Passed and approved this Bch day of J 5. ,2A Mayor Approved by: Attest: City Clerk City AttornKs Office (Sue Dulek - 06/27/2025) - Resolution No. 25-167 Page No. 9 It was moved by !^ , and seconded by Sa11h that the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Alter x Bergus x Harmsen x Moe x Sallh x Teague x Weilein Item Number: 10.c. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution Adopting the Human Rights Grant Allocations for Fiscal Year 2025. Prepared By: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Sue Dulek, First Assistant City Attorney Fiscal Impact: $100,000.00 Staff Recommendation: No recommendation Commission Recommendations: The Human Rights Commission by a 5-0 vote approved the recommendations. Attachments: minutes 5 13 25 Resolution Exhibit for Human Rights Grant Executive Summary: The Human Rights Commission recommends funding for Bike Library, Community Inclusion Club, The Dream Center, Escucha Mi Voz, Greater Iowa City, Inc., Great Plains Action Society, Immigration Welcome Network of Johnson County, Mogul Consulting, Restorative Community Works, Wright House of Fashion. Background / Analysis: The Human Rights Grant Program was available for Iowa City organizations to apply for from March 1 to April 1, 2025. To qualify, projects must meet at least one of the following criteria: build capacity to organize communities around human rights, strengthen the ability to mobilize communities in support of human rights, and educate the public on human rights, such as by organizing or facilitating educational public forums. r ��-4 CITY OF I O W A CITY Tom'i®!� MEMORANDUM Date: May 13, 2025 To: Mayor and City Council From: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator Re: Recommendation from Human Rights Commission At its special meeting of May 13, 2025, the Human Rights Commission made the following recommendation to the City Council: The Human Rights Commission recommends funding for Bike Library, Community Inclusion Club, The Dream Center, Escucha Mi Voz, Greater Iowa City, Inc., Great Plains Action Society, Immigration Welcome Network of Johnson County, Mogul Consulting, Restorative Community Works, Wright House of Fashion. Additional action (check one) No further action needed Board or Commission is requesting Council direction X Agenda item will be prepared by staff for Council action S:RECform.doc Approved Minutes Human Rights Commission May 13, 2025 Emma J. Harvat Hall Commissioners present: Kelsey Paul Shantz, Viana Qadoura, Mark Pries. Commissioners on Zoom: Emily Harkin, Doug Kollasch. Commissioners absent: Lubna Mohamed, Roger Lusala, Elizabeth Mendez -Shannon. Staff present: Stefanie Bowers. Recommendation to City Council: Yes. Meeting called to order: 5:35 PM. Native American Land Acknowledgement: Pries read the Land Acknowledgement. Public Comment of Items not on the Agenda: None. Ames to Host Conference for Commissioners: The conference will be held June 7, 2025, from 10 AM- 3 PM. It was undecided who will attend. Paul Shantz suggested reviewing the details of the event in case someone can attend and plans to check her own calendar to potentially attend the conference. Youth Awards Update and Details: Staff asked for commissioners to arrive a little before 6:00. Staff informed the commission there will be 37 recipients and the order of the event will go as follows: • Opening: Paul Shantz • Brief Remarks: Mayor Teague • Announcements of Honorees: Kollasch o Awards: Lusala & Mendez -Shannon • Closing Remarks: Pries Human Rights Grant: The commission discussed each application and their thoughts on each one. Paul Shantz provided a breakdown of each organization's average score (given from commissioner's reviews), and a ranking of the total averages. • Open Heartland: Open Heartland's application focuses on their ID Program which seeks to support immigrant families in Johnson County by offering workshops, trainings, activities, resources, etc. The program empowers immigrant communities to champion their rights. The requested amount is $12,644. Commissioners noted their confidence and admiration in the work of the organization, however there were concerns about the sensitivity of the data on immigrants that would result from a membership -based program. It was also expressed that the organization has seen a decrease in participation due to recent federal action taken against immigrants. The commission discussed that the group received the highest approval score amongst applicants. It was also noted the group has received Human Rights Grant funding in previous years (2021, 2022, 2024). Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $4,000. After being revisited, it was noted there are additional funding initiatives such as driving safety pamphlets, health record form copies, and translation button for website update. It was agreed to increase the funding to a partial funding total of $6,400. o Requested: $12,644.00 o Recommended: $6,400.00 • Escucha Mi Voz: Escusha Mi Voz has requested funding for their Know Your Rights Workshops for immigrants and allies, provisions for direct legal aid and housing support to immigrant families and the training of immigrant leaders in rights -based advocacy and organizing. The requested amount is $20,000. Commissioners discussed the immediate need for support amongst immigrant communities within Iowa City. It was noted that Escucha Mi Voz has created strong relationships that allow them to successfully achieve meaningful aid to immigrant families and their need for legal assistance, housing, and other resources. It was also noted they have funding from other outside organizations and have been a recipient of the grant in previous years. Partial funding was suggested due to overlapping efforts, however this overlap was discussed with a focus on Escucha Mi Voz's connections and ability to successfully provide aid where it is needed. It was also discussed that by funding these efforts it may lead to more exposure and opportunity for Know Your Rights workshops. Full funding was agreed on for the request of $20,000. o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $20,000.00 • Great Plains Action Society: Great Plains Action Society is requesting grant funding for a project that would convene the annual Truthsgiving celebration to educate on harmful colonialist myths on indigenous history and culture, to garner media advocacy, and promote mutual aid development and delivery. The requested amount is $20,000. Commissioners noted they have funded Truthsgiving before and the Great Plains Action Society has received funding from the Human Rights Grant in previous years (2022 and 2023), highlighting the idea that commissioners don't want organizations to become reliant on the Commission's grant. The budget was discussed amongst commissioners where they considered the group's need for exposure within the community. Some partial funding was suggested with a focus on the group's efforts to have a presence in the Englert Theatre. There was a discussion on the necessity of the content from the programming as the exposure to Indigenous history will allow for a sense of belonging and understanding amongst the Iowa City community. Commissioners agreed it is admirable the event is growing, and they want to help fund that expansion. There was also recognition of the Land Acknowledgement read at the beginning of each Human Rights Commission meeting that states the need for reparations, which this grant can contribute to. Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $10,000. The commission revisited the Great Plains Action Society application with remaining funds. It was suggested to allocate the remaining funds to Great Plains Action Society's Truthsgiving event. After reviewing the budget an increased funding of $12,500 was agreed on in order to cover the costs of the Englert Theatre. After reviewing applicants, the remaining funds were granted to Great Plains Action Society. It was agreed to increase the funding to a partial funding total of $15,415. o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $15,415.00 Wright House of Fashion: The Wright House of Fashion is requesting proceeds that would go toward Black student unions in High Schools in the Iowa City community in effort to build community and support change within those spaces and the community as a whole. The requested amount is $14,754. Commissioners stated their admiration of fashion and art to facilitate community. There was also admiration for the organization's focus of 10 youth apprentices and their potential to expand this sense of community across all Black Student Unions throughout neighboring schools. Regarding budget, it was noted that the organization received grant money of $100,000 from an outside organization (ARPA) as well. During the discussion of budget, staff clarified that "artist fees" are eligible to be covered by grant funding if it is an artist's performance, however an artist consultant may not be the City Attorney would have the final say. The commission discussed the longevity of the project and considered how it may operate in the years following. The discussion concluded that while the project may be a one-time effort it is still beneficial for the Commission to contribute to in order to see the impact of their contribution. The commission's previous contributions to this organization were considered. However, this application is unique in its representation, as no other applicants represent Iowa City's Black youth and their efforts. Partial funding was suggested in support of the field trip opportunity. Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $10,000. Additional funding was proposed to cover the full cost of the field trip. It was reviewed that the field trip was covered by the already allocated funds. o Requested: $14,754.00 o Recommended: $10,000.00 • Bike Library: The Iowa City Bike Library is requesting funding for a project to expand the outdoor courtyard of the bike library to improve its functionality and comfort as well as connection through community and educational events. The requested amount is $20,000. It was noted that the creation of public goods and a third space for patrons provides a unique value to the Iowa City community. It was noted the Bike Library has received funding from the Commission's grant program in 2021. There was a collective confidence in the Bike Library's ability to make this project happen as well as in their affiliation with partnering community organizations. It is reflected in their budget, that the requested amount is a portion of their project costs. It was noted that the efforts of the Bike Library not only meet the commission's goals, but also the City's goals in the way it impacts climate and community. The consideration of funding a physical project versus efforts towards a greater impact was discussed amongst commissioners. Partial funding was proposed considering potential restrictions and delays in construction. Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $10,000. o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $10,000.00 • Dream City: Dream City is requesting funding for a project that will develop a community strategic plan, a roadmap that outlines collaborative strategies, and a Community Conversation series. The requested amount is $15,000. In their application, both climate and community are highlighted in their intended strategic plan, which not only answers to the Commission's goals, but the City's as well. It was agreed this project is a great outreach effort and can help shift powers in the community by informing leaders of individual's own lived experience and interest. When discussing the budget, it was noted some details were left out with some catch-all categories listed. Due to this, a partial funding was suggested with a focus on the community and planning aspects of the proposal. Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $7,500. It was recommended to increase the partial funding from $7,500 to $9,000 as previously discussed. The commission agreed to increase the funding to a Partial funding total of $9,000. o Requested: $15,000.00 o Recommended: $9,000.00 • Greater Iowa City Inc.: Greater Iowa City is requesting funding to support the inclusive economic development collaboration created by and grounded in local, community -centered lived experience. The requested amount is $3,000. Highlights from this application included their coalition building aspects as well as the partner -centric model of working will well -placed, relevant community groups. There was also an appreciation for the community -centered conversations which will allow for a shared understanding and approach towards improvement. When discussing their budget, the Commission noted budget restrictions regarding facilitators and how much of the project the Commission would be allowed to fund. It was also noted there are no specifications on dates or deadlines for the project. It was clarified that the grant runs for a year, so they have one year to spend their money. It was also clarified that funds could be redirected if declared necessary by City Council. Full funding was agreed on for the request of $3,000. o Requested: $3,000.00 o Recommended: $3,000.00 • Immigrant Welcome Network of Johnson County: The Welcome Network is requesting funding for their monthly community event Voices of Resilience that allows immigrant stories and voices to be heard and to raise awareness about the systemic barriers faced by immigrants. As well as for the purchase of a seven -passenger van for the transport of immigrant and refugee families to critical services across Iowa City, Coralville, and Cedar Rapids. The requested amount is $20,000. It was noted this request is a repeat request from last year's Grant applicants and was denied due to the idea of providing funding for a van due to unforeseeable issues with the vehicle. It was suggested to stick with that decision but to go forward with funding the conversation series. Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $7,000. o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $7,000.00 • Unity Exchange (Mogul Consulting): Unity Exchange is requesting funds for four community marketplace events that offer vending opportunities for entrepreneurs from marginalized communities. These events will feature cultural performances, community conversations and structural educational elements. The requested amount is $20,000. It was discussed that the events proposed duplicate some of the other proposed efforts amongst this year's applications. There was also concern of conflicts with other significant community events. When discussing the budget, it was noted there are some proposed allocations that are not eligible for funding. Highlights of the application are the cultural and celebratory aspects of the market. Partial funding was recommended for the event costs while avoiding funding the vendor support. Another shared concern is the outcome of participants due to the target demographic being immigrants and minority communities during a time of uncertainty for these groups. Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $6,000. N o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $6,000.00 Restorative Community Works: Restorative Community Works is requesting funding for their project of a public story telling initiative that centers the experiences of adults in Iowa City who have impacted by the judicial system. This event includes a story preparation workshop as well as the public forum where the stories will be shared. The requested amount is $20,000. The structure of the proposal was appreciated by commissioners, and it was noted the breakdown of the event as well as the future impact was helpful. It was also shared that the story telling initiative is very powerful as it provides the space, the time, and the tools that provide awareness and lead to change. There were concerns regarding the budget, noting questionable expenses under the permissions of the grant allocation as well as saving opportunities by outsourcing resources. It was noted this is a project with a unique voice (formerly incarcerated individuals) and it has a protentional for longevity, as it can be repeated and extended to a broader audience. Partial funding was agreed on for a grant of $12,000. o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $12,000.00 • Community Inclusion Club: Community Inclusion Club is requesting funds for their efforts to empower Iowa City community members with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). The project supports these individuals by developing the knowledge and skillset to voice their concerns at the State and national level to collectively stand up for their rights. The requested amount is $1,185. It was clarified the group would be creating a conversation that is informed by the IDD community in order to foster advocacy and raise awareness to general audiences. It was unanimously agreed that full funding would be granted. There was a note that due to the bulk of the budget going towards T-shirts the organization could create a design they could use in the future rather than for a one-time event. Full funding was agreed on for the request of $1,185. o Requested: $1,185.00 o Recommended: $1,185.00 • BIPOC Healing Collective: The BIPOC Healing Collective is requesting funds to provide unique mental health needs to BIPOC and minoritized individuals and communities. This would happen through a combination of direct services, educational outreach, and advocacy. The project notes 16 therapy sessions to 40 clients totaling $80,000. The requested amount is $20,000. It was noted, in support of the initiative, that systems work against the BIPOC population, referring to systemic racism, so this is an opportunity for those communities to talk to someone. There were concerns of limited access assuming there is one provider for all clients. There was uncertainty amongst commissioners regarding where the funding is directed and if the grant restriction permit said funding. While it was agreed this project is a commendable effort that is needed in the community, due to uncertainty in funding and lack of details in the application the Commission agreed there will not be funding for this project. While the Commission cannot provide funding, it was suggested they provide resources and connection to the group so they can further their efforts. o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $0.00 • Home 4 My Peeps: Home 4 My Peeps is requesting funds to establish a sustainable community on 50 acres of lands which integrate housing, regenerative agriculture, and renewable energy systems. The requested amount is $20,000. It was noted there is support for the dream behind this effort, with a focus on the effort towards housing. Conceptually, the project has more of a focus on sustainability rather than human rights. It was also noted the application could have benefitted from more details regarding the intended outcome behind each aspect proposed. Due to a lack of details in the application and uncertainty behind certain efforts the Commission agreed there will not be funding for this project. However, the applicant is encouraged to apply again next year after taking into account the missing details in their application and making more of a connection between their process, the outcome, and human rights. o Requested: $20,000.00 o Recommended: $0.00 With funds remaining, the commission revisited previous applications they noted could benefit from additional funding: o Open Heartland o Great Plains Action Society o Wright House of Fashion It was noted that these organizations being revisited are previous recipients of the grant. Adjourned: 8:31 PM. The meeting can be viewed at https://www.youtube.com/@citychannel4/videos. Human Rights Commission ATTENDANCE RECORD YEAR 2024/2025 (Meeting Date) NAME TERM EXP. 1/23 2/27 314 3/26 4/23 5/28 7/23 8/27 9/24 11/26 12/12 1/28 2/25 4/1 4/22 5113 JahnaviPandya 2024 X X X X X X X X A A - - - - - - Emily Harkin 2027 - - - - - - - - - P - P P X P Z Doug Kollasch 2027 X X X X X X Z X X P - P P X P Z Viana Qadoura 2025 X X X X X X X X X P - A A X P P Idriss Abdullahi 2025 - - - - X Z X Z A P - P A A Z - Mark Pries 2025 X A X X X X X X X P - A P X P P Roger Lusala 2026 X X X A X X X X X P - P P A A A Kelsey Paul Shantz 2026 X X X X Z X X A X P - P A X P P Liz Mendez -Shannon 2026 X X X A Z X X A X A - P P X A A Lubna Mohamed 2027 - - - - - - - - - - - Z A Z Z A KEY: X = Present A = Absent Z = Present via Zoom Prepared by: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator, Office of Human Rights, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5022. Resolution No. 99-1 eR Resolution Adopting the Human Rights Grant Allocations for Fiscal Year 2025 Whereas, the City Council approved funding in the fiscal year 2025 budget for the Human Rights Grants for community -based organizations to educate the public on human rights, such as organizing and facilitating educational public forums that address one or more of the broad range of topics included within the rubric of human rights; and Whereas, the City has disseminated the Human Rights Grant applications to Iowa City organizations; and Whereas, the City has received 13 submissions for the Human Rights Grant for fiscal year 2025; and Whereas, the Human Rights Commission held a meeting to discuss and review applications regarding the allocation of funds for the grants for fiscal year 2025; and Whereas, the Human Rights Commission has recommended that the attached Exhibit A be approved; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the Human Rights Grant allocations have a public purpose and the public interest will be served by the adoption of the fiscal year 2025 Human Rights Grant allocations. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. The allocation of fiscal year 2025 Human Rights Grant funds attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby approved and adopted. 2. The City Manager or designee is hereby authorized to execute, terminate, or amend Human Rights Grant agreements consistent with Exhibit A. Passed and approved this 81h day of July ­2025 Mby'or Approved by Attest: i'-\QhG�� 2, City Clerk City Attor y's Office (Sue Dulek - 07/0312025) Resolution No. 25-168 Page No. 2 It was moved by Bergus , and seconded by ai c e that the resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: x Alter �- Bergus x Harmsen _ x Moe _ x Salih x Teague x Weilein HRC Approved Organization Amount Our Kids DBA Open Heartland $6,400.00 Escucha Mi Voz Iowa $20,000.00 Great Plains Action Society $15,415.00 Wright House of Fashion $10,000.00 Bike Library $10,000.00 The Dream Center DBA Dream City $9,000.00 Greater Iowa City, Inc. $3,000,00 Immigrant Welcome Network of Johnson County $7,000.00 Mogul Consulting $6,000.00 Restorative Community Works $12,000.00 Community Inclusion Club $1,185.00 Total $100,000.00 Item Number: 10.d. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution approving Substantial Amendment #1 to City Steps 2030 which includes the FY26 Annual Action Plan. Prepared By: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Fiscal Impact: The City anticipates receiving $741,332 in CDBG funds and $378,560.15 in HOME funds from HUD for FY26 which will be used in conjunction with program income and any uncommitted or returned funds. Staff Recommendation: Approval Commission Recommendations: The Housing and Community Development Commission recommended approval at their June 16, 2025 meeting with a vote of 6-0. Attachments: HCDC 6.16.25 draft minutes Resolution Appendix A Executive Summary: A public meeting and resolution considering approval of Substantial Amendment #1 to City Steps 2030 will be held on July 8, 2025. City Steps 2030 was adopted by City Council on January 21, 2025 for City fiscal years 2026-2030. The amendment will incorporate the FY26 Annual Action Plan, which describes the projects and activities proposed for funding in the fiscal year, into City Steps 2030. The amendment will also incorporate CDBG and HOME funding allocations into the plan as well as ensure consistency with current federal regulations. The previously approved City Steps 2030 plan and the proposed amendment draft can be found on the City website at www.icgov.org/actionplan. Background / Analysis: As an entitlement community, Iowa City receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds annually from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to carry out housing and community development activities serving low-income residents of the community. For FY26, the City has been allocated $741,332 in CDBG and $378,560.15 in HOME funds. To receive these funds, the City must submit an Annual Action Plan describing the projects and activities proposed for funding for the upcoming year. The FY26 Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD as part of City Steps 2030, therefore the adoption of the plan requires a Substantial Amendment to City Steps. In FY26, the following activities will be funded: • Public services ($124,000) • Owner -occupied rehab ($250,000) • Rental rehab ($75,000) • Down Payment Assistance ($240,000) • Tenant Based Rental Assistance ($200,000) • Community Housing Development (CHDO) Operations and Reserve Activities ($118,260.15) • Competitive Rental Acquisition ($214,132) • Competitive Public Facilities ($150,000) • Planning and Administrative Costs ($198,500) The total investment for FY26 is budgeted at $1,569,892. This includes the current allocation as well as program income and any uncommitted or returned funds. Additional information on beneficiaries can be found in Appendix A attached to the resolution. Additional revisions to the previously adopted City Steps 2030 have been made to ensure the City is in compliance with current federal regulations. Since the adoption of the plan in January, several Executive Orders have been issued that impact federal funding. In order to receive CDBG and HOME funding, the City must demonstrate compliance with all applicable Executive Orders. Staff have been working with the City Attorney's office, HUD, and other entitlement communities to understand the new regulations and best position ourselves to meet the requirements. At this time staff do not anticipate any substantial changes to CDBG and HOME activity outcomes in FY26 based on these new regulations. The draft Substantial Amendment #1 to City Steps 2030 including the FY26 Annual Action Plan was made available for public comment beginning on June 16, 2025. HCDC reviewed the draft and recommended approval at their June 16, 2025 meeting with a vote of 6-0. At the time of this submission, no public comments have been received. The plan is due to HUD on July 18, 2025. MINUTES HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION JUNE 16, 2025 — 6:30 PM FORMAL MEETING E M M A J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL DRAFT MEMBERS PRESENT: Horacio Borgen, Maryann Dennis, Amos Kiche, George Kivarkis (via zoom), Karol Krotz, Kyle Vogel MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brianna Thul OTHERS PRESENT: None RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to City Steps 2030 which includes the FY26 Annual Action Plan to City Council. Krotz seconded the motion and a vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan to City Council. Kiche seconded the motion, a vote was taken and it passed 6-0. W11 I N ivi 14 A 11► 1011111OX01 V 114 Vogel called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: MAY 19, 2025: Krotz moved to approve the minutes of May 19, 2025. Kiche seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the minutes were approved 5-0 (Borgen not present for vote). PUBLIC COMMENT FOR TOPICS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. REVIEW AND CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON APPROVAL OF THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO CITY STEPS 2030 WHICH INCLUDES THE FY26 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN: Thul explained the five-year City Steps 2030 plan sets the goals and strategies for what Iowa City is going to do in this period. The Annual Action Plan says what specific activities they're going to undertake that year to work towards the goals. City Steps 2030 was approved in January. The first year of the planning period is a little unique in that the Annual Action Plan is technically a part of the City's five-year plan. In years two through five, the Commission will see the Action Plan come to them as a separate document. She explained that because the year one Action Plan is part of City Steps, this is technically called an amendment. The Annual Action Plan shows the programming of the HUD funds into the specific activities that will be done in FY26. The amendment includes updates to the document to be consistent with final award amounts, it incorporates the Annual Action Plan as mentioned, and it ensures consistency with a lot of rapidly changing regulations. As an example, Thul noted one thing that has changed is HUD has Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 2 of 5 eliminated the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirement to do an Analysis of Impediments study. There were portions of that study that were incorporated into City Steps and that's no longer a requirement. Therefore, staff deleted some of that language just to be consistent with some of the new regulations. Thul stated the structure of these planning documents are very prescribed by HUD and typically the Commission is most interested in the specific projects that the City is going to undertake that are listed in a summary located in the appendix. She continued that dollars programmed in this plan will fund the different City programs such as homeowner rehab, a new pilot rental rehab program, the City's down payment assistance program, and tenant based rental assistance. It will also support local nonprofit agencies through the CDBG portion that goes to Aid to Agencies and through Community Housing Development Organizations, which are special nonprofits that can undertake housing activities. The City is required to set a percentage of the HOME funds aside for CHDO activities. The City will also do a competitive funding round. Thul noted that the Commission will see that funding round coming soon. Thul stated there are no public comments to date on this amendment and staff is requesting HCDC recommend approval of this amendment to City Council. City Council will hold a public meeting on July 8 where they will accept public comments and consider approval of the amendment. If the amendment is approved, staff would submit the document to HUD. Dennis asked how much funding is going to be available for the competitive round. Thul replied that for competitive rental acquisition there will be about $214,000 and then for public facility projects there will be $150,000. Thul reminded Commissioners that they have parsed down the types of activities that will be funded through the competitive round. Krotz asked if they are targeting that $214,000 for one project. Thul responded that the target beneficiaries do say one rental unit and one public facilities for the funds. However, let's say the Commission gets two public facility project applications and they want to recommend funding to both at half of the available amount each, they certainly do that. It's okay to exceed the goals set, but they try to set reasonable goals. Vogel asked what the definition of affordable housing under the affordable housing section is. Thul replied that project requirements vary type of activity and the funding. If it's a HOME activity, like the down payment assistance program, an applicant can be up to 80% of area median income, but then there are specific underwriting requirements. For example, the monthly housing payment including insurance can only be 30% of the applicant's gross income. If it was a rental project, HUD also restricts the amount of rent that the landlord can charge to the tenant. For HOME funds, HUD sets the maximum rents for the area and then there's a utility allowance. The maximum rent minus the utility allowance is the rent that they can charge to the tenant. A landlord can charge less, but the maximum rent they can charge to the tenant is restricted. Dennis asked about HOME funds for rentals and if there are different income levels based on the number of units. Thul confirmed yes HOME requires that they maintain a unit mix, but for the most part they require income under 60% for rentals. A landlord would need to make sure that the tenant is under 60% of the area median income for a HOME assisted unit. Many times with HOME projects, the limit might be 60% of area median income, but tenants served are well below that limit. Thul explained that the rent and income limits for these programs are set annually by HUD. Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to City Steps 2030 which includes the FY26 Annual Action Plan to City Council. Krotz seconded the motion and a vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. REVIEW AND CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON APPROVAL OF THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN: Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 3 of 5 Thul stated the next document is called the Citizen Participation Plan which is a HUD requirement that guides how cities gain input for planning documents. It directs things like when staff brings things to HCDC and how long the public comment period should be. Again, this updates is technically called a substantial amendment to the plan that was last updated in 2020. They try to do a general update every five years with the consolidated planning process. With this amendment they are modernizing the methods of input, they are ensuring consistency with current regulations, adding provisions for disasters and emergencies, increasing the clarity and the input for the approval process for each plan and any associated amendments. Thul acknowledged the process for input is generally the same, but this amendment is breaking out each plan to add clarity. Additionally, it makes clear that staff will attempt input from HCDC but that staff would proceed with the process if a Commission meeting is canceled. If there are deadlines for plans staff needs to be able to proceed with the process to submit on time. Krotz asked if citizens can come to the City Council meeting and present thoughts. Thul stated yes and for example, with the substantial amendment for the last item the Commission just reviewed, the City starts a public comment period where they'll announce it in the Press Citizen and online. Then they do a 30 day public comment period. People can submit comments in writing to staff, they could submit comments to the clerk's office, they can come to this HCDC meeting and make a public comment, and they can come to City Council and make a public comment there, so there's several different ways that someone can have their input incorporated. Staff would accept written input like a mailed letter as well. Kiche asked is there a restriction on the place where a public meeting would be conducted. Thul noted they try to do most of the meetings like this at City Hall, but when they do the public input process for City Steps, that does have additional requirements on where they can hold the public input meetings. At least one of the meetings needs to be in a neighborhood of Iowa City where at least 50% of residents have low to moderate income. For public input initiatives of that scale they also try to hold meetings in different locations and at different times to try to get as much feedback as possible. Kiche asked if there is usually some communication with the community organizations in form of writing to their leaders. Thul replied that yes, during that public input process staff really relies on the nonprofit community. They are super helpful in distributing flyers and getting people to do the surveys. When the City did the public meetings for City Steps 2030, they partnered with agencies like Neighborhood Centers of Johnson County to hold meetings at the Broadway and Pheasant Ridge Centers. Vogel asked what the requirements on a minor versus a substantial amendment is, he understands a minor amendment means there doesn't need to be any public input, but in a substantial amendment situation there would be a requirement for public input. He knows a lot of the minor ones are where CDBG/HOME funds can get applied to something else or a program gets canceled and they don't have to have a whole series of public input for that. So, when something becomes a substantial amendment, what is that process? Is it one or two public meetings and do they have to go through the whole public comment process all over again? Thul stated a substantial amendment takes a little bit more time and it's not something that would happen quickly. The amendment process is less intense than developing the development of the full five-year plan, but it still takes a meeting of the HCDC and then a City Council meeting to get a substantial amendment approved. There is a list of things in the Citizen Participation Plan explaining what is substantial and what is administrative. Thul continued to say that staff retain the ability to bring amendments forward to a public meeting or to HCDC if they feel it's something that needs input even if it is considered administrative. Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan to City Council. Kiche seconded the motion, a vote was taken and it passed 6-0. 3 Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 4 of 5 STAFF & COMMISSION UPDATES: Thul noted that at a previous meeting someone had asked about narrative accomplishments for Aid to Agencies project so Sam Turnbull, the City's Grants Specialist, prepared a memo which was included in the packet. They also included the 2024 Neighborhood and Development Services Annual Report. Thul also noted the Council passed the amendment to the by-laws and that they all have received a copy of the newly revised by-laws. Thul announced that the FY26 Non -Legacy Aid to Agencies application opened today. Applications will be due July 16 at noon. Krotz noted they have a couple of Commissioners whose terms expire at the end of this month and wondered if there were any updates? Thul stated new Commissioner appointments are on the City Council agenda for tomorrow and noted that Dennis has reapplied for the Commission, but Borgen has not. Vogel thanked Borgen for his service and commitment. Kivarkis noted he's been offered a career opportunity in the city of Chicago, and unfortunately his permanent residence in Iowa City will be expiring August 1 and he will be forced to resign from the Commission. He wanted to take a moment to thank the City staff and the entire Commission as it's been an honor working them during his limited time on HCDC, he generally feels that he learned a lot and that they were able to make their process a little more efficient. He is happy with the direction they moved in his time on the Commission. Kiche congratulated Kivarkis and said that it has been encouraging to have a young person and a student as a role model on the Commission. Borgen thanked staff and City Council for the opportunity to serve. He hopes that there will continue to be Latino representation on the Commission. He feels that is important for the Latino community in Iowa City. Thul thanked Borgen and Kivarkis for their service to the Commission. She also noted that they hope to see Dennis back in July, but just in case she also wanted to say thank you to Dennis for her service as well. Thul noted sometimes the Commission takes a summer break and asked if Commissioners would like to meet July 21. All decided they would be willing to meet. Vogel would like to have a future agenda item about the start times for HCDC meetings. He asked if a 5:30 meeting start would be difficult for people or would everyone be willing to change? Commissioners agreed. Krotz asked how much advanced notice they need to give to the public that the meeting times are changing. Thul stated they would put it on the next agenda for discussion and a vote. The next meeting would still be at 6:30, but it could change after that if approved. ADJOURNMENT: Dennis moved to adjourn, Krotz seconded the motion and a vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. 4 Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 5 of 5 Housing and Community Development Commission Attendance Record 2024-2025 Name Terms Exp. 3/21 4/18 5/16 6/13 8/19 9/16 10/21 3/24 4/21 5/19 6/16 -- -- -- -- A A P A A D D Balde, Daouda 6/30/27 A A P P P A A P P A P Borgen, Horacio 6/30/25 (zoom) P P P P P P P P P P P Dennis, Maryann 6/30/25 Kiche, Amos 6/30/25 -- -- P P A P P P Kivarkis, George 6/30/27 zoom A A P P A P P A A P P Krotz, Karol 6/30/27 A A P P P P P Patel, Kiran 6/30/26 A P P P A P A Pierce, James 6/30/26 P P P A P A p Szecsei, Denise 6/30/25 P P A A P P P P P P P Vogel, Kyle 6/30/26 Key: P = Present A = Absent * = Resigned -- = Vacant D = Discharged IC;,-L Prepared by: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5230 Resolution No. 25-169 Resolution approving Substantial Amendment #1 to City Steps 2030 which includes the FY26 Annual Action Plan Whereas, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to prepare and submit a Consolidated Plan every five years to plan the use of federal funds to assist lower income residents with housing, jobs, public facilities, and public services; and Whereas, on January 21, 2025 the City Council of Iowa City adopted the Iowa City Consolidated Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-2030, known as City Steps 2030, in Resolution 25-29; and Whereas, City Steps 2030 should be amended to ensure consistency with current regulations, to include the FY26 Annual Action Plan following the announcement of federal Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership Program allocations, and to update City Steps 2030 with final allocation amounts; and Whereas, the City has disseminated information, solicited public input, and held a public meeting on the substantial amendment to City Steps 2030, which is summarized in the attached Appendix A; and Whereas, on June 16, 2025 the Iowa City Housing and Community Development Commission recommended approval of the substantial amendment to City Steps 2030; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the public interest will be served by the approval of the substantial amendment to City Steps 2030 and submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. City Steps 2030, including the FY26 Annual Action Plan which is summarized in the attached Appendix A, as amended, is hereby approved and adopted. 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to submit to HUD all necessary certifications or documents related to the submission of City Steps 2030. Passed and approved this 8th day of July, 2025. Attest: ° d� K t!� City Clerk Mayor City Attorneys Office (Sue Dulek - 07102/2025) - Resolution No. 25-169 Page No. 9 and seconded b Moe , that the It was moved by Aleer y resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: x Alter Bergus x Harmsmsen x Moe x Salih x Teague x Weilein Append xA FY26 Annual Action Plan -Project Summary Pahlio Services Funding CDBG Source Beneficiaries I HOME Target Aid to Agencies (CDBG Portion) $124,000.00 NA 1000 individuals Attordahte Hausln¢ CDBG HOME Target City Owner -Occupied Rehab $250,000.00 $0.00 8owner units City Rental Rehab $75,000.00 $0.00 2 rental units city Downpayment Assistance $0.00 $240,000.00 9owner units City Tenant Based Rental Assistance NA $200,000.00 45 renter households CHDO Reserve Activities NA $99,360.15 1rental unit CHDO Operations NA $18,900.00 NA Competitive Rental Acquisition $214,132.00 NA Sren[al unit Rahtic Adtities CDBG HOME Target Competitive Public Facility $150,000.00 NA 1 facility AtlmID CDBG HOME Target Planning and Administration $153,200.00 $45.300.00 NA Item #10.d STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: � r m �t..s._ CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240- 1 826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org City of Iowa City City Steps 2030 Substantial Amendment #1 FY26 Annual Action Plan July 8, 2025 City Steps 2030 Iowa City's Five -Year Consolidated Plan Substantial Amendment #1 • Funding Allocations • FY26 Annual Action Plan • Compliance with any changed federal regulations and applicable Executive Orders FY26 Funding FY25 FY26 $ Change % Change CDBG $716,206.00 $741,332.00 $25,126.00 3.51% HOME $384,280.57 $378,560.15 -$5,720.42 -1.49% Total $1,100,486.57 $1,119,892.15 $19,405.58 1.76% Historic Funding - CDBG & HOME $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1, 400, 000 $1, 200, 000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 mCDBG mHOME —Admin Historic Funding - Inflation Adjusted $3, 500, 000 $3,000,000 $ 2, 500, 000 $ 2, 000, 000 $1, 500, 000 $1, 000, 000 $500,000 $0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 ■ CDBG I HOME FY26 Funded Activities - Annual Action Plan FundingSource j- Beneficiaries Public Services GDBG HOME Target Aid to Agencies (CDBO Portion) $124,000.00 NA 1000 individuals Affordable Hou!in CDBC HOME Target City Owner -Occupied Rehab $250,000,00 $0.00 8 owner units City Rental Rehab $75,000,00 $0.00 2 rental units City Downpayment Assistance $0,00 $240,000.00 9 owner units City Tenant Based RentalAssistance NA $200,000.00 45 renter households CHDO Reserve Activities NA 99,860.15 1rental unit CHDO Operations NA $18,900.00 NA Competitive Rental Acquisition $214,12,00 NA 1 rental unit Public Facilities CDBC HOME Target Competitive Public Facility $150,000.00 NA 1facility Admir1 CDBC HOME Target Nanning and Administration $153,200.00 $45.800.00 o4$603,560-11 NA Regulatory Updates • Affirmativelg Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) mandate rescinded • Various Executive Orders for Federal Funding Iowa City will continue to comply with federal regulations relating to administration of CDBG and HOME funding. Next Steps Public Notice • The 30-day public comment period for this Substantial Amendment ends July 8, 2025. • No written comments received to -date Plan Submission • City Steps 2030 including the FY26 Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD bg the deadline of July 18, 2025 Funding • The competitive funding process for CDBG public facilities and rental acquisition is underway. • Applications are due August 4, 2025 by noon • Funds for other activities will be available after plan approval, agreements, and environmental reviews. ••10•• STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r m7pL CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240- 1 826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Item Number: 10.e. CITY OF IOWA CITY COUNCIL ACTION REPORT July 8, 2025 Resolution approving a Substantial Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan and Rescinding Resolution No. 20-11. Prepared By: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Fiscal Impact: No Impact Staff Recommendation: Approval Commission Recommendations: The Housing and Community Development Commission recommended approval by a vote of 6-0 at their June 16, 2025 meeting. Attachments: HCDC 6.16.25 minutes -draft Resolution Citizen Participation Plan -Draft for public comment June 2025 Executive Summary: The Citizen Participation Plan sets forth the policies and procedures for public participation and seeks to help residents participate in the development of and amendments to various plans required for federal CDBG and HOME funding. The purpose of this amendment is to modernize methods of input, ensure consistency with current regulations, add provisions for disasters and emergencies, and increase clarity in the input and approval process for each plan. The proposed amendment as well as the current plan can be found online at www.icgov.org/actionplan. Background / Analysis: Iowa City's Citizen Participation Plan is a requirement established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to ensure that residents, especially low- and moderate -income individuals, have a meaningful role in the development and implementation of federally funded housing and community development programs. Locally, the Citizen Participation Plan outlines policies and procedures for public participation related to federal entitlement funds including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) funds. Iowa City works to engage the public, especially those who are typically underrepresented or affected most by policy decisions. The consolidated planning process provides the most extensive outreach efforts to determine funding priorities for the next five years. The City Steps 2030 outreach process included stakeholder sessions, public meetings held in low- income neighborhoods, meetings in partnership with service providers, surveys, and social media posts. Flyers and surveys were translated into Arabic, French, Spanish and Mandarin. The Citizen Participation Plan also guides participation surrounding the City's Annual Action Plan, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), fair housing plans, as well as the Citizen Participation Plan itself. Any time a new plan is created or a substantial change is made to one of these documents, staff go through a public process to ensure transparency and opportunity for input. This public process typically involves a public notice, a 15- or 30-day public comment period, review by the Housing and Community Development Commission (HCDC), and a public meeting with City Council. The 2025 Citizen Participation Plan update revises the plan to include reference to virtual public input options consistent with current public meeting practices, adds provisions for disasters and emergencies in the event of another public health emergency, ensures consistency with current regulations, and increases clarity in the input and approval process for each plan. The most substantial change is to clarify that staff can proceed to City Council in the event that HCDC is unable to meet or cannot reach a quorum to make a recommendation. In this situation staff would provide commissioners with an opportunity to provide input on the item individually. The purpose of this change is to ensure that the City is able to meet HUD funding deadlines. Standard practice will be to continue to include HCDC in review of CDBG and HOME plans and activities. A 30-day public comment period for the Citizen Participation Plan began on June 6, 2025. As of the date of this submission, no public comments have been received. The Plan will take effect upon Council approval and will be used in conjunction with City Steps 2030 beginning in FY26. MINUTES HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION JUNE 16, 2025 — 6:30 PM FORMAL MEETING E M M A J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL DRAFT MEMBERS PRESENT: Horacio Borgen, Maryann Dennis, Amos Kiche, George Kivarkis (via zoom), Karol Krotz, Kyle Vogel MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brianna Thul OTHERS PRESENT: None RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to City Steps 2030 which includes the FY26 Annual Action Plan to City Council. Krotz seconded the motion and a vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan to City Council. Kiche seconded the motion, a vote was taken and it passed 6-0. W11 I N ivi 14 A 11► 1011111OX01 V 114 Vogel called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: MAY 19, 2025: Krotz moved to approve the minutes of May 19, 2025. Kiche seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the minutes were approved 5-0 (Borgen not present for vote). PUBLIC COMMENT FOR TOPICS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. REVIEW AND CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON APPROVAL OF THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO CITY STEPS 2030 WHICH INCLUDES THE FY26 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN: Thul explained the five-year City Steps 2030 plan sets the goals and strategies for what Iowa City is going to do in this period. The Annual Action Plan says what specific activities they're going to undertake that year to work towards the goals. City Steps 2030 was approved in January. The first year of the planning period is a little unique in that the Annual Action Plan is technically a part of the City's five-year plan. In years two through five, the Commission will see the Action Plan come to them as a separate document. She explained that because the year one Action Plan is part of City Steps, this is technically called an amendment. The Annual Action Plan shows the programming of the HUD funds into the specific activities that will be done in FY26. The amendment includes updates to the document to be consistent with final award amounts, it incorporates the Annual Action Plan as mentioned, and it ensures consistency with a lot of rapidly changing regulations. As an example, Thul noted one thing that has changed is HUD has Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 2 of 5 eliminated the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirement to do an Analysis of Impediments study. There were portions of that study that were incorporated into City Steps and that's no longer a requirement. Therefore, staff deleted some of that language just to be consistent with some of the new regulations. Thul stated the structure of these planning documents are very prescribed by HUD and typically the Commission is most interested in the specific projects that the City is going to undertake that are listed in a summary located in the appendix. She continued that dollars programmed in this plan will fund the different City programs such as homeowner rehab, a new pilot rental rehab program, the City's down payment assistance program, and tenant based rental assistance. It will also support local nonprofit agencies through the CDBG portion that goes to Aid to Agencies and through Community Housing Development Organizations, which are special nonprofits that can undertake housing activities. The City is required to set a percentage of the HOME funds aside for CHDO activities. The City will also do a competitive funding round. Thul noted that the Commission will see that funding round coming soon. Thul stated there are no public comments to date on this amendment and staff is requesting HCDC recommend approval of this amendment to City Council. City Council will hold a public meeting on July 8 where they will accept public comments and consider approval of the amendment. If the amendment is approved, staff would submit the document to HUD. Dennis asked how much funding is going to be available for the competitive round. Thul replied that for competitive rental acquisition there will be about $214,000 and then for public facility projects there will be $150,000. Thul reminded Commissioners that they have parsed down the types of activities that will be funded through the competitive round. Krotz asked if they are targeting that $214,000 for one project. Thul responded that the target beneficiaries do say one rental unit and one public facilities for the funds. However, let's say the Commission gets two public facility project applications and they want to recommend funding to both at half of the available amount each, they certainly do that. It's okay to exceed the goals set, but they try to set reasonable goals. Vogel asked what the definition of affordable housing under the affordable housing section is. Thul replied that project requirements vary type of activity and the funding. If it's a HOME activity, like the down payment assistance program, an applicant can be up to 80% of area median income, but then there are specific underwriting requirements. For example, the monthly housing payment including insurance can only be 30% of the applicant's gross income. If it was a rental project, HUD also restricts the amount of rent that the landlord can charge to the tenant. For HOME funds, HUD sets the maximum rents for the area and then there's a utility allowance. The maximum rent minus the utility allowance is the rent that they can charge to the tenant. A landlord can charge less, but the maximum rent they can charge to the tenant is restricted. Dennis asked about HOME funds for rentals and if there are different income levels based on the number of units. Thul confirmed yes HOME requires that they maintain a unit mix, but for the most part they require income under 60% for rentals. A landlord would need to make sure that the tenant is under 60% of the area median income for a HOME assisted unit. Many times with HOME projects, the limit might be 60% of area median income, but tenants served are well below that limit. Thul explained that the rent and income limits for these programs are set annually by HUD. Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to City Steps 2030 which includes the FY26 Annual Action Plan to City Council. Krotz seconded the motion and a vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. REVIEW AND CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON APPROVAL OF THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN: Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 3 of 5 Thul stated the next document is called the Citizen Participation Plan which is a HUD requirement that guides how cities gain input for planning documents. It directs things like when staff brings things to HCDC and how long the public comment period should be. Again, this updates is technically called a substantial amendment to the plan that was last updated in 2020. They try to do a general update every five years with the consolidated planning process. With this amendment they are modernizing the methods of input, they are ensuring consistency with current regulations, adding provisions for disasters and emergencies, increasing the clarity and the input for the approval process for each plan and any associated amendments. Thul acknowledged the process for input is generally the same, but this amendment is breaking out each plan to add clarity. Additionally, it makes clear that staff will attempt input from HCDC but that staff would proceed with the process if a Commission meeting is canceled. If there are deadlines for plans staff needs to be able to proceed with the process to submit on time. Krotz asked if citizens can come to the City Council meeting and present thoughts. Thul stated yes and for example, with the substantial amendment for the last item the Commission just reviewed, the City starts a public comment period where they'll announce it in the Press Citizen and online. Then they do a 30 day public comment period. People can submit comments in writing to staff, they could submit comments to the clerk's office, they can come to this HCDC meeting and make a public comment, and they can come to City Council and make a public comment there, so there's several different ways that someone can have their input incorporated. Staff would accept written input like a mailed letter as well. Kiche asked is there a restriction on the place where a public meeting would be conducted. Thul noted they try to do most of the meetings like this at City Hall, but when they do the public input process for City Steps, that does have additional requirements on where they can hold the public input meetings. At least one of the meetings needs to be in a neighborhood of Iowa City where at least 50% of residents have low to moderate income. For public input initiatives of that scale they also try to hold meetings in different locations and at different times to try to get as much feedback as possible. Kiche asked if there is usually some communication with the community organizations in form of writing to their leaders. Thul replied that yes, during that public input process staff really relies on the nonprofit community. They are super helpful in distributing flyers and getting people to do the surveys. When the City did the public meetings for City Steps 2030, they partnered with agencies like Neighborhood Centers of Johnson County to hold meetings at the Broadway and Pheasant Ridge Centers. Vogel asked what the requirements on a minor versus a substantial amendment is, he understands a minor amendment means there doesn't need to be any public input, but in a substantial amendment situation there would be a requirement for public input. He knows a lot of the minor ones are where CDBG/HOME funds can get applied to something else or a program gets canceled and they don't have to have a whole series of public input for that. So, when something becomes a substantial amendment, what is that process? Is it one or two public meetings and do they have to go through the whole public comment process all over again? Thul stated a substantial amendment takes a little bit more time and it's not something that would happen quickly. The amendment process is less intense than developing the development of the full five-year plan, but it still takes a meeting of the HCDC and then a City Council meeting to get a substantial amendment approved. There is a list of things in the Citizen Participation Plan explaining what is substantial and what is administrative. Thul continued to say that staff retain the ability to bring amendments forward to a public meeting or to HCDC if they feel it's something that needs input even if it is considered administrative. Dennis moved to recommend approval of the substantial amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan to City Council. Kiche seconded the motion, a vote was taken and it passed 6-0. 3 Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 4 of 5 STAFF & COMMISSION UPDATES: Thul noted that at a previous meeting someone had asked about narrative accomplishments for Aid to Agencies project so Sam Turnbull, the City's Grants Specialist, prepared a memo which was included in the packet. They also included the 2024 Neighborhood and Development Services Annual Report. Thul also noted the Council passed the amendment to the by-laws and that they all have received a copy of the newly revised by-laws. Thul announced that the FY26 Non -Legacy Aid to Agencies application opened today. Applications will be due July 16 at noon. Krotz noted they have a couple of Commissioners whose terms expire at the end of this month and wondered if there were any updates? Thul stated new Commissioner appointments are on the City Council agenda for tomorrow and noted that Dennis has reapplied for the Commission, but Borgen has not. Vogel thanked Borgen for his service and commitment. Kivarkis noted he's been offered a career opportunity in the city of Chicago, and unfortunately his permanent residence in Iowa City will be expiring August 1 and he will be forced to resign from the Commission. He wanted to take a moment to thank the City staff and the entire Commission as it's been an honor working them during his limited time on HCDC, he generally feels that he learned a lot and that they were able to make their process a little more efficient. He is happy with the direction they moved in his time on the Commission. Kiche congratulated Kivarkis and said that it has been encouraging to have a young person and a student as a role model on the Commission. Borgen thanked staff and City Council for the opportunity to serve. He hopes that there will continue to be Latino representation on the Commission. He feels that is important for the Latino community in Iowa City. Thul thanked Borgen and Kivarkis for their service to the Commission. She also noted that they hope to see Dennis back in July, but just in case she also wanted to say thank you to Dennis for her service as well. Thul noted sometimes the Commission takes a summer break and asked if Commissioners would like to meet July 21. All decided they would be willing to meet. Vogel would like to have a future agenda item about the start times for HCDC meetings. He asked if a 5:30 meeting start would be difficult for people or would everyone be willing to change? Commissioners agreed. Krotz asked how much advanced notice they need to give to the public that the meeting times are changing. Thul stated they would put it on the next agenda for discussion and a vote. The next meeting would still be at 6:30, but it could change after that if approved. ADJOURNMENT: Dennis moved to adjourn, Krotz seconded the motion and a vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. 4 Housing and Community Development Commission June 16, 2025 Page 5 of 5 Housing and Community Development Commission Attendance Record 2024-2025 Name Terms Exp. 3/21 4/18 5/16 6/13 8/19 9/16 10/21 3/24 4/21 5/19 6/16 -- -- -- -- A A P A A D D Balde, Daouda 6/30/27 A A P P P A A P P A P Borgen, Horacio 6/30/25 (zoom) P P P P P P P P P P P Dennis, Maryann 6/30/25 Kiche, Amos 6/30/25 -- -- P P A P P P Kivarkis, George 6/30/27 zoom A A P P A P P A A P P Krotz, Karol 6/30/27 A A P P P P P Patel, Kiran 6/30/26 A P P P A P A Pierce, James 6/30/26 P P P A P A p Szecsei, Denise 6/30/25 P P A A P P P P P P P Vogel, Kyle 6/30/26 Key: P = Present A = Absent * = Resigned -- = Vacant D = Discharged It �/ Prepared by: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5230 Resolution No. 25-170 Resolution approving a Substantial Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan and Rescinding Resolution No. 20-11 Whereas, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the City of Iowa City, Iowa to prepare and submit a Citizen Participation Plan to meet HUD's basic requirements for resident participation in preparing the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, Performance Report, and any associated amendments; and Whereas, the Citizen Participation Plan has been revised to modernize methods of input, ensure consistency with current regulations, add provisions for disasters and emergencies, and increase clarity in the input and approval process for each plan and any associated amendments; and Whereas, said Citizen Participation Plan replaces the plan adopted by City Council on January 7, 2020 in Resolution No. 20-11; and Whereas, the City has disseminated information, solicited public input, and held a public meeting on the substantial amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan, which is attached; and Whereas, on June 16, 2025 the Iowa City Housing and Community Development Commission recommended approval of the substantial amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the public interest will be served by the approval of the substantial amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan and submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that 1. The attached Citizen Participation Plan, as amended, is hereby approved and adopted. 2. City Council Resolution No. 20-11 is rescinded. 3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to submit to HUD all necessary certifications or documents related to the submission of the Citizen Participation Plan. 4. The City Manager is hereby designated as the Chief Executive Officer and authorized to act on behalf of the City of Iowa City in connection with the Citizen Participation Plan. Passed and approved this 811 day of July, 2025. ----77 Mayor Resolution No. 25-170 Page No. 2 Attest City Clerk City Attorneys Office (Sue Dulek - 07102/2025) It was moved by aloe and seconded by Bergus that the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: x Alter x Bergus x Harmsen —� Moe x Salih x Teague x Weilein CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development requires the City to have a plan for involving residents in the programming of federal funds including CDBG and HOME. The plan describes how residents can provide input and is formally known as a Citizen Participation Plan. While the federal regulation uses the term "Citizen," this plan is meant to encourage all residents and stakeholders to participate. nr®r�� Contents 1. Introduction 2. Encouragement of Participation 3. The Citizen Participation Plan 4. The Consolidated Plan 5. The Annual Action Plan 6. Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report 7. Other Administrative Topics 1. Introduction Purpose The City of Iowa City is an Entitlement Grantee under the federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME). The City's Neighborhood and Development Services (NDS) Department is responsible for the statutory and regulatory requirements for each of these programs and is also the program administrator. The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the City to have a plan for involving residents in the programming of federal funds including CDBG and HOME. The plan describes how residents can provide input and is formally known as a Citizen Participation Plan (CPP). While the federal regulation uses the term "Citizen," this plan is meant to encourage all residents and stakeholders to participate. The CPP presents the City's intent for encouraging all residents to participate in the development, revision, amendment, adoption, and implementation of the following HUD required plans: • Citizen Participation Plan o As described above, the CPP outlines how the City will engage and involve community members in decision -making processes to ensure voices are heard. • The Consolidated Plan (known as City Steps) o The Consolidated Plan explains how the City will use federal CDBG and HOME funds to address housing and community development needs in Iowa City. • The Annual Action Plan o The Annual Action Plan provides the allocation of federal funds, project goals, and timelines to address housing and community development needs within the community for the upcoming year. • The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) o The CAPER provides a detailed account of how federal funds were spent, the outcomes achieved, and whether the housing and development goals were met during the program year. Lead Agency NDS is the lead entity responsible for the administration of the CDBG and HOME programs for the City of Iowa City. Designated Contact Person All communication regarding the documents covered by the CPP, comments, complaints, reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities, translation services, or other elements shall be directed to the Neighborhood Services Coordinator or their designee: Neighborhood Services Coordinator 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 Phone: (319) 356-5121 Email: ekublvfdiowa-city.org Effective Date Upon approval by City Council, the CPP shall be effective until it is amended or otherwise replaced. 2. Encouragement of Participation General The City provides for and encourages all residents to participate in the development, revision, amendment, adoption and implementation of its planning documents related to CDBG and HOME funds. The City will take appropriate actions to encourage the participation of all residents, including, but not limited to, those that are non-English speakers, individuals with disabilities, and those that meet the income guidelines for the programs' (generally those below 80%of Area Median Income). Non -English -Speaking Residents The City has a significant population of non-English speakers. Other than English, the most common languages in Iowa City according to census information are Arabic, Spanish, French, and Chinese. To encourage non-English speaking residents to participate in planning processes, the City will translate marketing materials for public input opportunities into these languages. For example, flyers for stakeholder sessions to gather input for a Consolidated Plan will be available in English, Arabic, Spanish, French, and Chinese. Individuals with Disabilities Individuals with disabilities requiring special accommodations to participate in public meetings should call the designated contact person no later than three (3) business days prior to the day of a meeting. The City will conduct all public meetings in locations that are accessible to individuals with disabilities, when available. If requested, the City will mail copies of public meeting notices to persons who are homebound and request such accommodation no less than seven days prior to the public meeting. All advertisements for public meetings will indicate such and include the following The City of Iowa City will make reasonable accommodations and services necessaryfar individuals with disabilities at the public meeting. Additionally, translation and interpretation services may be offered upon request and availability. Persons requiring such accommodations should contact the City of Iowa City's Deportment of Neighborhood and Development Services at least three business days in advance of the meeting at tdesionated contact's email) or (designated contact phone number). Upon request, the City will provide plans covered in this document in a format accessible to individuals with disabilities (e.g., providing a large print copy of a plan for someone with a visual impairment). ' Federal income guidelines vary by funding source and activity type. Income limits are established annually by HUD for Iowa City. Residents that Meet Federal Income Eligibility Guidelines To encourage residents of Iowa City that meet the federal income eligibility guidelines to attend and participate, staff will make an effort to ensure public meetings are held at times that are convenient for those potential and actual beneficiaries who are most likely to be affected by the proposed actions. Residents of public and assisted housing are encouraged to participate. The City will provide information about the Consolidated Plan activities and other relevant information to the Iowa City Housing Authority to share with program participants. Organizations and Agencies The City encourages the participation of local and regional institutions, the Balance of State Continuum of Care (planning body that coordinates funding and delivery of housing and services for people experiencing homelessness(, businesses, developers, nonprofit organizations, philanthropic organizations, and community -based and faith -based organizations in the process of developing, revising, amending, adopting and implementing all documents covered by this plan. This will be achieved through stakeholder interviews, focus groups, public comments, and/or public meetings. Public Notices Public review/comment periods and public meetings held in the process of developing, revising, amending, adopting and implementing the documents covered by this plan shall be advertised in the Iowa City Press -Citizen and/or online at icgov.org no less than one day before the public review and comment period commences and no less than seven calendar days before a public meeting is held. Minimum number of days for public display and comment: Document Minimum Number of Calendar Days Citizen Participation Plan 30 Consolidated Plan 30 Annual Action Plan 30 CAPER 15 Substantial Amendments to the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, and Citizen Participation Plan 30 Public Meeting All public meetings will be scheduled at times and locations that are reasonably convenient for potential and actual program beneficiaries, and with reasonable accommodations as requested. The City may, at times, hold public meetings virtually through Zoom or a similar platform. In these instances, instructions for participating virtually will be included in all public notices. In order to encourage greater input from the public, the City typically has virtual access available for in - person public meetings. Staff recommend in -person participation due to the potential for technological issues during virtual public meetings. In the event of loss of virtual access during a meeting, the meeting will continue in -person as quorum levels allow. In general, the public meetings held through the program year address the following minimum requirements: • Housing and community development needs • Development of proposed activities • Proposed strategies and actions related to fair housing consistent with current federal regulations • Review of program performance • Receiving comments, input, and feedback related to each plan and/or report Document Access The City will post copies of all documents covered by this plan on its website accessible at: www.icgov.org • Most documents are available at www icgoy.org/action via n • City Steps 2030 is available at www.icgoy.org/2030 Members of the public that experience any difficultly locating the documents covered by this plan may contact Neighborhood and Development Services staff at 319-356-5230 for assistance or to make an open records request. Other Engagement Techniques The CPP may be amended as the City continues to gain access to technology that improves the avenues of participation by its residents. 3. The Citizen Participation Plan CPP Development The City shall use the following procedure when developing its CPP. a. Public Meeting The City will hold a public meeting to accept comments on the CPP, or any substantial amendments thereto, prior to its approval and submittal to HUD. Public comments will be accepted at any time during the public comment period and at the City Council meeting at which the substantial amendment will be considered by City Council. The City will provide the Housing and Community Development Commission with the opportunity to make comments on the plan draft at their public meetings and/or in writing. If a public meeting of the Housing and Community Development Commission is scheduled and is canceled due to lack of quorum or other reasons, the plan will proceed to City Council in order to not delay any planning processes and/or submissions to HUD. Members of the Commission may make comments on the proposed amendment at any time during the public comment period. b. Public Display and Comment Period The draft CPP will be made available for public review for a 30-day period prior to City Council adoption and maybe done concurrently with the public review and comment process for the Consolidated Plan. Copies of the draft CPP will be made available for review at the following locations: • City website: www.icgov.org. • At a minimum, print copies will be available at City Hall, 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 in the Neighborhood and Development Services Department and/or the Iowa City Housing Authority. The City may also make documents available at the Iowa City Public Library, 123 S Linn St., Iowa City, IA 52240. In addition, the City will make available a reasonable number of free copies to residents and groups that request them in writing. c. Comments Received on the Draft Plan Written comments will be accepted by the designated contact person during the 30-day public comment period. The City will consider any comments or views of residents received in writing, or orally at the public meeting, in the final plan. A summary of these comments or views, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons why, will be attached to the final plan for submission to HUD. d. City Council Action The plan will be presented to City Council for consideration and formal action. A summary of all written comments and those received orally during the Housing and Community Development Commission meeting (if applicable), as well as the City's responses to all written comments, will be attached to the plan prior to submission to City Council. City Council may approve the document as presented, or City Council may approve the plan with amendments as they see fit. e. Submission to HUD The plan will be approved as a stand-alone document and submitted to HUD with a summary of all written comments and those received orally during the public meeting, as well as the Cib/s responses to written comments and proof of compliance with the 30-day public review and comment period requirement. A summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefore shall be supplied to HUD as well. Amendments to the Approved CPP The City shall use the following procedure to amend its approved CPP, as needed. a. Amendment Considerations The City will amend the plan, as necessary, to ensure adequate engagement and involvement of the public in making decisions related to its HUD programs. Substantial amendments to the CPP may be required should a provision of the plan be found by the City to conflict with HUD regulations, or when changes in HUD regulations occur. Edits to the CPP that only include updated contact information or editorial changes for clarity will not be placed for a formal public review and comment period, nor will a public meeting or City Council action be required. b. Public Display and Comment Period When a substantial amendment is required to the CPP, the City will generally follow the same process identified above under CPP Development (items b-e). Only one public meeting is required for a substantial amendment. The City will hold a public meeting to accept comments on the draft substantial amendments prior to its approval and submittal to HUD. Public comments will be accepted at any time during the public comment period and at the City Council meeting at which the substantial amendment will be considered by City Council. The City may also provide the Housing and Community Development Commission with the opportunity to make comments on the substantial amendment at their public meetings. If a public meeting of the Housing and Community Development Commission is scheduled and is canceled due to lack of quorum or other reasons, the plan will proceed to City Council in order to not delay any planning processes and/or submissions to HUD. Members of the Commission may make comments on the proposed amendment at any time during the public comment period. In the Event of a Disaster or Emergency In the event of a local, state or federally declared disaster or emergency where public places may be closed to the public or in -person participation may not be feasible or large gatherings may be considered a public health risk, the City may opt to forgo the public meeting for substantial amendments to its CPP. The length of public comment for amendments to the CPP shall be no less than five(5)days. Draft documents for public comment and review will be made available on the City's website at www.icgov.org. Copies of the draft documents will be mailed or e-mailed upon request, if possible. 4. The Consolidated Plan Consolidated Plan Development The City will follow the process and procedures described below in the development of its Consolidated Plan. a. Stakeholder Consultation and Resident Outreach A variety of mechanisms maybe utilized to solicit input from these persons/service providers/agencies/entities. These may include letters, phone calls, virtual or in -person interviews, surveys, internet-based feedback, focus groups, and/or consultation workshops. In the development of the Consolidated Plan, the City will consult with public and private agencies that may include, but is not limited to, the following: Assisted housing providers • Social service providers including those focusing on services to underrepresented groups, families with children, the elderly, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, homeless persons, and other protected classes • Continuum of Care that serves the jurisdiction • Community -based and regionally based organizations that represent protected class members and organizations that enforce fair housing laws • Business and civic leaders • Organizations promoting economic and/or workforce development • Regional government agencies involved in metropolitan -wide planning and transportation responsibilities • Broadband internet service providers, organizations engaged in narrowing the digital divide • Agencies whose primary responsibilities include the management of flood prone areas, public land or water resources • Emergency management agencies • Adjacent local governments • Local or state health and child welfare agencies to examine existing data related to lead - based paint hazards and poisonings, including health department data on the addresses of housing units in which children have been identified as lead -poisoned. • Other related organizations and agencies b. Public Meeting The City will conduct at least two public meetings during the development of the Consolidated Plan. • The first public meeting will be conducted before the draft Consolidated Plan is developed. The purpose of the public meeting is to gather community input on housing and community development needs in Iowa City. This meeting will be held in a neighborhood in Iowa City where at least 51%of persons are below 80%of Area Median Income. • The City will hold a second public meeting to accept comments on the draft Consolidated Plan prior to its approval and submittal to HUD. Public comments will be accepted at any time during the public comment period and at the City Council meeting at which the substantial amendment will be considered by City Council. • The City may also provide the Housing and Community Development Commission with the opportunity to make comments on the plan at their public meetings. If a public meeting of the Housing and Community Development Commission is scheduled and is canceled due to lack of quorum or other reasons, the plan will proceed to City Council in order to not delay any planning processes and/or submissions to HUD. Members of the Commission may make comments on the proposed amendment at any time during the public comment period. c. Public Display and Comment Period The draft Consolidated Plan will be placed on display for a period of no less than 30 days to encourage public review and comment. The public notice shall include: • A brief summary and purpose oft he Consolidated Plan • The anticipated amounts of funding (including program income, if any) • Proposed activities likely to result in displacement (if any) • Plans for minimizing the displacement of persons as a result of CDBG and HOME activities (if any) • Plans to assist persons actually displaced by the project (if any) • Dates of the public display and comment period • Locations where copies of the draft Consolidated Plan can be examined • How comments will be accepted • When the document will be considered for action by City Council • The anticipated submission date to HUD Copies of the draft Consolidated Plan will be made available for review at the following locations: • City website: www.icgov.org/2030 • At a minimum, print copies will be available at City Hall, 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 in the Neighborhood and Development Services Department and/or the Iowa City Housing Authority. The City may also make documents available at the Iowa City Public Library, 123 S Linn St. Iowa City, IA 52240. In addition, the City will make available a reasonable number of free copies of the draft document to residents and groups that request them in writing. d. Comments Received on the Draft Plan Written comments will be accepted by the designated contact person during the 30-day public comment period. The City will consider any comments or views of residents received in writing, or orally at the public meeting, in the final Consolidated Plan. A summary of these comments or views, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons why, will be attached to the final plan for submission to HUD. e. City Council Action The plan will be presented to City Council for consideration and formal action. A summary of all written comments and those received orally during the Housing and Community Development Commission meeting (if applicable), as well as the Cites responses to all written comments, will be attached to the plan prior to submission to City Council. City Council may approve the document as presented, or City Council may approve the plan with amendments as they see fit. f. Submission to HUD The Consolidated Plan will be approved as a stand-alone document and submitted to HUD with a summary of all written comments and those received orally during the public meeting as well as the City's responses to written comments and proof of compliance with the 30-day public review and comment period requirement. A summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefore shall be supplied to HUD as well. The Consolidated Plan will be submitted to HUD no less than 45 days before the start of the City's five-year program cycle, or at such time as instructed by HUD. Amendments to the Consolidated Plan The City shall follow the following procedure to revise its Consolidated Plan, as needed. a. Minor Amendments and Substantial Amendments There are two types of amendments that may occur with the Consolidated Plan, minor amendments and substantial amendments. An amendment to the approved Consolidated Plan is considered substantial when it proposes to: • Make a change in its allocation priorities. • Make a change in the method of distribution of funds. • Carry out a project using funds from any program covered by the Consolidated Plan not previously described in the Annual Action Plan (including program income, reimbursements, repayment, recaptures, or reallocations from HUD). • Change use of federal funds from one eligible activity to another. • Change the location of a project that is "neighborhood specific" or in a designated urban revitalization area (e.g., to eliminate slum and blight) to areas beyond that neighborhood. • Change the purpose of a project with respect to the objectives as originally described, such as a change in the type of project or its ultimate objective (e.g., canceling a public facility project and allocating those funds to a housing project). • Increase a project budget by more than $50,000 or by more than 25%of the original budget allocations, whichever is greater. • Reduce the number of assisted beneficiaries or affordable housing units by more than fifteen (15) or by more than 25%of the original number, whichever is greater. All other changes that do not meet the criteria defined above will be considered minor amendments will be reviewed and approved by the Neighborhood and Development Services Director and City Manager and will not be subject to public comments. These changes will be fully documented in writing. Examples of a minor amendments may include: • Canceling an existing activity or program if no funds were expended. • Updating the amount of prior year HOME or CDBG program income, which was unknown at the time of drafting the APP. • Transferring a funded activity from one approved grant year to another to facilitate the efficient use of CDBG and HOME funds (e.g., using uncommitted FY2022 CDBG grant funds to fund an activity that was awarded FY2023 CDBG grant funds). • Funding activities for administration, public services, TBRA, downpayment assistance, Community Housing Development Organizations, or housing rehab. • Amending existing agreements with grant recipients, so long as they do not trigger a need for a substantial amendment. • Changing the location of a project that is not "neighborhood specific" or in a designated urban revitalization area. • Changing the purpose of an activity with respect to the objectives as originally described in the Annual Action Plan or funding application. • Increasing a project budget by $50,000 or lessor by 25%or less oft he original budget allocation, whichever is greater. • Reducing the number of beneficiaries or housing units being assisted by fifteen (15) or less or by 25%or less, whichever is greater. • Decreasing a project budget if the work is completed or increasing the number of beneficiaries or housing units being assisted. • Making typographical,grammatical, clarificatory, or technical corrections that do not trigger a substantial amendment. • Modifying the document per HUD's requests following submission to HUD, so long as it does not trigger a substantial amendment. All amendments, substantial and minor, will be submitted to HUD via the IDIS. c. Public Display and Comment Period When a substantial amendment is required to the plan, the City will generally follow the same process identified above under Consolidated Plan Development (items c-f). Only one public meeting is required for a substantial amendment The City will hold a public meeting to accept comments on the draft substantial amendments prior to its approval and submittal to HUD. Public comments will be accepted at any time during the public comment period and at the City Council meeting at which the substantial amendment will be considered by City Council. The City may also provide the Housing and Community Development Commission with the opportunity to make comments on the substantial amendment at their public meetings. If a public meeting of the Housing and Community Development Commission is scheduled and is canceled due to lack of quorum or other reasons, the plan will proceed to City Council in order to not delay any planning processes and/or submissions to HUD. Members of the Commission may make comments on the proposed amendment at any time during the public comment period. In the Event of a Disaster or EmerRen In the event of a local, state or federally declared disaster or emergency where public places may be closed to the public or in -person participation may not be feasible or large gatherings may be considered a public health risk, the City will conduct public meetings exclusively via virtual methods such as conference call or live web -streaming with the ability to ask questions in real time. Accommodations will be made for persons with disabilities and non-English speaking persons upon request, such as sign language or language interpretation services. Documents for public review will be shared via the Cis website. Copies of the document may be mailed or e-mailed upon request. Additionally, where program funds covered by this plan may be expended to carry out eligible activities to address the City's disaster response, the City's requirements under this plan will be streamlined to include: a. A 5-day public display and comment period to amend the Consolidated Plan or a period of public as outlined and directed by HUD or the State of Iowa. 10 b. A minimum of one public meeting shall be held to receive comments on the revised Consolidated Plan. c. The amended Consolidated Plan will be presented to City Council for public comment and consideration and formal action. The Housing and Community Development Commission may also hold a public meeting to accept comments. d. The amended Consolidated Plan will be submitted to HUD upon City Council approval S. The Annual Action Plan The Annual Action Plan is a component of the Consolidated Plan, and it describes the City's proposed use of available federal and other resources to address the priority needs and specific objectives in the Consolidated Plan for each program year, the City's method for distributing funds, and the geographic areas of the City to which it will direct assistance. Annual Action Plan Development The City will follow the process and procedures described below in the development of its Annual Action Plan. a. Activities to Be Undertaken The Annual Action Plan includes activities to be undertaken with CDBG and HOME funds. The City follows the framework identified in the Consolidated Plan to establish the annual budget for programs and activities. A portion of CDBG funds is typically made available to eligible nonprofit agencies to undertake specific projects including rental acquisition and public facility activities (subject to availability). Funds are awarded through a competitive process that generally includes the following elements: • Funds that are available for the competitive round will be announced via a news release. • Information related to the opportunity including the amount offunds available, eligible activities, and timeline will be posted on the City's website. • An applicant guide and an applicant workshop are provided by staff to assist those interested in applying. All potential applicants (including groups representative of residents that meet federal income eligibility guidelines) are strongly encouraged to contact the designated contact person for technical assistance before initiating a funding request application. • City staff provide analysis of proposals and funding recommendation to the Housing and Community Development Commission. • The Housing and Community Development Commission reviews proposals, staff analysis/recommendations, and makes funding recommendations to City Council at a public meeting. • City Council determines final budget allocations and approves the corresponding Annual Action Plan. b. Public Meeting 11 The City will conduct at least two public meetings during the development of Annual Action Plan. • The first public meeting will be conducted before the draft Annual Action Plan is developed. The City will address housing and community development needs, development of proposed activities, the amount of assistance the City expects to receive (including grant funds and program income), the range of activities that may be undertaken, including the estimated amount that will benefit residents that are income eligible, and a review of program performance. This public meeting is typically held through the Housing and Community Development Commission but may be conducted independently of the commission if needed to encourage additional participation from the public. • The City will hold a second public meeting to accept comments on the draft Annual Action Plan prior to its approval and submittal to HUD. Public comments will be accepted at any time during the public comment period and at the City Council meeting at which the Annual Action Plan will be considered by City Council. • The City will provide the Housing and Community Development Commission with the opportunity to make comments on the plan draft at their public meetings and/or in writing. If a public meeting of the Housing and Community Development Commission is scheduled and is canceled due to lack of quorum or other reasons, the plan will proceed to City Council in order to not delay any planning processes and/or submissions to HUD. Members of the Commission may make comments on the proposed amendment at any time during the public comment period. c. Public Display and Comment Period The draft Annual Action Plan will be placed on display for a period of no less than 30 days to encourage public review and comment. The public notice shall include a brief summary of the Annual Action Plan, the anticipated amounts of funding (including program income, if any), the dates of the public display and comment period, the locations where copies of the draft Annual Action Plan can be examined, how comments will be accepted, when the document will be considered for action by City Council and the anticipated submission date to HUD. Copies of the draft Annual Action Plan will be made available for review at the following locations: • City website: www.icgov.org/actionelan. • At a minimum, print copies will be available at City Hall, 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 in the Neighborhood and Development Services Department and/or the Iowa City Housing Authority. The City may also make documents available at the Iowa City Public Library, 123 5 Linn St., Iowa City, IA 52240. In addition, the City will make available a reasonable number of free copies to residents and groups that request them in writing. d. Comments Received on the Draft Annual Action Plan 12 Written comments will be accepted by the designated contact person during the 30-day public comment period. The City will consider any comments or views of residents received in writing, or orally at the public meeting, in the final Annual Action Plan. A summary of these comments or views, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons why, will be attached to the final plan for submission to HUD. City Council Action The plan will be presented to City Council for consideration and formal action. A summary of all written comments and those received orally during the Housing and Community Development Commission meeting (if applicable), as well as the City's responses to all written comments, will be attached to the plan prior to submission to City Council. City Council may approve the document as presented, or City Council may approve the plan with amendments as they see fit. f. Submission to HUD The Annual Action Plan will be approved as a stand-alone document and submitted to HUD with a summary of all written comments and those received orally during the public meeting as well as the City's responses to written comments and proof of compliance with the 30-day public review and comment period requirement. A summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons therefore shall be supplied to HUD as well. The Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD no less than 45 days before the start of the Cites program cycle, or at such time as instructed by HUD. Amendments to the Annual Action Plan The City shall follow the following procedure to amends its approved Annual Action Plan, as needed. a. Minor Amendments and Substantial Amendments There are two types of amendments that may occur with the Annual Action Plan, minor amendments and substantial amendments. An amendment to the approved Consolidated Plan is considered substantial when the amendment proposes to: • Make a change in its allocation priorities or a change in the method of distribution of funds. • Carry out a project using funds from any program covered by the Consolidated Plan not previously described in the AAP (including program income, reimbursements, repayment, recaptures, or reallocations from HUD). • Change use of federal funds from one eligible activity to another • Change the location of a project that is "neighborhood specific" or in a designated urban revitalization area (e.g., to eliminate slum and blight) to areas beyond that neighborhood. • Change the purpose of a project with respect to the objectives as originally described in City Steps, such as a change in the type of project or its ultimate objective (e.g., canceling a public facility project and allocating those funds to a housing project). • Increase a project budget by more than $50,000 or by more than 25%of the original budget allocations, whichever is greater. 13 • Reduce the number of assisted beneficiaries or affordable housing units by more than fifteen (15) or by more than 25%of the original number, whichever is greater All other changes that do not meet the criteria defined above will be considered minor amendments, will be reviewed and approved by the Neighborhood and Development Services Director and City Manager and will not be subject to public comments. These changes will be fully documented in writing. Examples of a minor amendments may include: • Canceling an existing activity or program if no funds were expended. • Updating the amount of prior year HOME or CDBG program income, which was unknown at the time of drafting the APP. • Transferring a funded activity from one approved grant year to another to facilitate the efficient use of CDBG and HOME funds (e.g., using uncommitted FY2022 CDBG grant funds to fund an activity that was awarded FY2023 CDBG grant funds). • Funding activities for administration, public services, TBRA, downpayment assistance, Community Housing Development Organizations, or housing rehab. • Amending existing agreements with grant recipients, so long as they do not trigger a need for a substantial amendment. • Changing the location of a project that is not "neighborhood specific' or in a designated urban revitalization area. • Changing the purpose of an activity with respect to the objectives as originally described in the Annual Action Plan or funding application. • Increasing a project budget by $50,000 or less or by 25%or less of the original budget allocation, whichever is greater. • Reducing the number of beneficiaries or housing units being assisted by fifteen (15) or less or by 25%or less, whichever is greater. • Decreasing a project budget if the work is completed or increasing the number of beneficiaries or housing units being assisted. • Making typographical,grammatical, clarificatory, or technical corrections that do not trigger a substantial amendment. • Modifying the document per HUD's requests following submission to HUD, so long as it does not trigger a substantial amendment. All amendments, substantial and minor, will be submitted to HUD via the IDIS. d. Public Display and Comment Period When a substantial amendment is required to the plan, the City will generally follow the same process identified above under Annual Action Plan Development (items c-f). Only one public meeting is required for a substantial amendment The City will hold a public meeting to accept comments on the draft substantial amendments prior to its approval and submittal to HUD. Public comments will be accepted at any time during the public comment period and at the City Council meeting at which the substantial amendment will be considered by City Council. The City may also provide the Housing and Community Development Commission with the opportunity to make comments on the substantial amendment at their public 14 meetings. If a public meeting of the Housing and Community Development Commission is scheduled and is canceled due to lack of quorum or other reasons, the plan will proceed to City Council in order to not delay any planning processes and/or submissions to HUD. Members of the Commission may make comments on the proposed amendment at any time during the public comment period. In the Event of a Disaster or Emergency In the event of a local, state or federally declared disaster or emergency where public places may be closed to the public or in -person participation may not be feasible or large gatherings may be considered a public health risk, the City will conduct public hearings and meetings exclusively via virtual methods such as conference call or live web -streaming with the ability to ask questions in real time. Accommodations will be made for persons with disabilities and non-English speaking persons upon request, such as sign language or language interpretation services. Documents for public review will be shared via the City's website. Copies of the document may be mailed or e-mailed upon request. Additionally, where program funds covered by this plan may be expended to carry out eligible activities to address the City's disaster response, the City's requirements under this plan will be streamlined to include: a. A 5-day public display and comment period to amend the Annual Action Plan or a period of public as outlined and directed by HUD or the State of Iowa. b. A minimum of one public meeting shall be held to receive comments on the revised Annual Action Plan. c. The amended Annual Action Plan will be presented to City Council for public comment and consideration and formal action. The Housing and Community Development Commission may also hold a public meeting to accept comments. d. The amended Annual Action Plan will be submitted to HUD upon City Council approval. 6. The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report CAPER Development The City shall follow the following procedure in the development of its Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). a. Report Considerations The City will evaluate and report the accomplishments and expenditures of the previous program year for CDBG and HOME and draft the CAPER in accordance with HUD requirements. b. Public Display and Comment Period Copies of the draft CAPER will be made available for review at the following locations: • City website: www.icgov.org/actionplan 15 • At a minimum, print copies will be available at City Hall, 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 in the Neighborhood and Development Services Department and/or the Iowa City Housing Authority. The City may also make documents available at the Iowa City Public Library, 123 S Linn St., Iowa City, IA 52240. In addition, the City will make available a reasonable number of free copies to residents and groups that request them in writing. c. Public Meetings Although a public meeting is not required for the CAPER, City staff typically present the annual accomplishments to the Housing and Community Development Commission each year during a public meeting. d. Comments Received on the Draft CAPER Written comments will be accepted by the designated contact person during the 15-day public display and comment period. The City will consider any comments orviews of City residents received in writing in preparing the final CAPER. A summary of these comments or views, and a summary of any comments or views not accepted and the reasons why, will be attached to the final CAPER for submission to HUD. d. Submission to HUD The CAPER will be submitted to HUD within 90 days following the end of the Cites program year. 7. Other Administrative Topics Potential Displacement of Persons Although the City does not anticipate any residential displacement to occur in the foreseeable future, it is required to describe its plans to minimize the displacement of persons and to assist any persons displaced. When displacement is unavoidable on a temporary or permanent basis, the City will comply with the federal Uniform Relocation Act. Should displacement of residents be necessary as a result of the use of funds covered by this Plan, the City will compensate as required by the URA and implementing regulations. Complaints a. General Complaints Residents may register complaints regarding any aspect of the CDBG and HOME program by contacting the designated contact person. All written complaints received will be addressed in writing within 15 business days. b. Objections to the Consolidated Plan Residents wishing to object to HUD approval of the final Consolidated Plan may send written objections to: 16 Des Moines Field Office 210 Walnut Street Room 937 Des Moines, IA 50309-2155 Phone:(5151284-4512 Objections should be made within 30 days after the City has submitted the Consolidated Plan to HUD. Any objections should be based on the following reasons: • The applicant's description of needs and objectives is plainly inconsistent with available facts and data • The activities to be undertaken are plainly inappropriate to meeting the needs and objectives identified by the applicant • The application does not comply with the requirements of the CDBG programs or other applicable laws • The application proposed activities which are otherwise ineligible under the program regulations. Objections shall include both an identification of requirements not met and available facts. 17 Item #10.e STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: � r m �t..s._ CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240- 1 826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Citizen Participation Plan • Sets forth policies and procedures for public participation • Seeks to help residents participate in development and amendments to plans required for CDBG/HOME funding. • Updating as part of the consolidated planning process (every five years) Revisions: • Modernize methods of input • Add provisions for disasters and emergencies • Ensure consistency with current regulations • Increase clarity in the input and approval process for each plan Citizen Participation Plan City Steps 2030 Annual Action Plan CAPER Public Input Seeking Input" Community and Housing Needs --- in Iowa City As part of its City Steps 0 plan, the LEARN MORE ®IOWACITY icgov.org/2030 3r, Take the online survey o., o If you have questions or need d isabilRy-related accammobations to participate in the stakeholder workshops, contact Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services, at ekublvf `'awac'ly.org, a 311-111-1121. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient lime to meet your access needs. 0 . Public Meetings • Pheasant Ridge Neighborhood Center: 7/30/24 at 6:00pm • Saint Patrick Church (Escucha Mi Voz): 7/31/24 at 7:00pm • Broadway Neighborhood Center: 8/1/24 at 5:30pm • Virtual public meeting 9/9/24 at 2:30pm Stakeholder Input Sessions 1. Housing Needs of Underserved Populations 2. Housing Assistance and Barriers to Safe Affordable Housing 3. People Experiencing or At -Risk of Homelessness 4. Non -Housing Community Development and Basic Needs 5. Workforce Development 6. Sustainable Neighborhoods and Amenities Housing Needs Survey for Iowa City • Translated to Spanish, French, Arabic & Mandarin • 336 responses completed Shelter Survey STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r m7pL CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240- 1 826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org