Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09-11-25 Historic Preservation Commission
lowd City Historic Preservation Commission Thursday September 5:30 p.m. 11, 2023; n• � � • I��lll[ilrll�Jf1V • wV ,^ y III � � • (1 `�►•� �� � e M JInk Emma J. Harvat Hall y� �� �`�.V' r � City Hall I )nnnn J s, e C� A S9 Gpl tlm/HFc-Stale=ovaW mi Cuc IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, September 11, 2025 City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street Emma J. Harvat Hall 5:30 p.m. Agenda A) Call to Order B) Roll Call C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda D) Certificates of Appropriateness 1. HPC25-0030: 317 Fairchild Street — Northside Historic District (metal roof replacement and Yankee gutter removal) 2. HPC25-0050: 721 Grant St — Longfellow Historic District (rear demolition and new addition) 3. HPC25-0054: 622 North Van Buren Street — Brown Street Historic District (rear deck demolition and door to window alteration) 4. HPC25-0056: 415 Clark Street — Clark Street Conservation District (new garage) E) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff Minor Review — Staff Review 1. HPC25-0042: 624 North Johnson Street — Brown Street Historic District (window sash replacement) 2. HPC25-0052: 528 East College Street — College Green Historic District (roof shingle replacement) Intermediate Review — Chair and Staff Review 1. HPC25-0051: 1046 Woodlawn Avenue — Woodlawn Historic District (replacement of stairs and decks) 2. HPC25-0055: 404 E Jefferson Street —Jefferson Street Historic District (foundation wall ventilation alteration) F) Consideration of Minutes for August 14, 2025 G) Commission Information H) Commission Discussion 1. Iowa Highway 6 Bridge Mitigation Project 2. Awards I) Adjournment If you will need disability -related accommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact Jessica Bristow, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5243 or at jessica-bristow@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs. Staff Report Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner Historic Review for HPC25-0030: 317 Fairchild Street General Information: Owners: Peter Speltz & Ida Santana Contractor: Justin Pardekooper Pardekooper Construction pardekoopercon(a-)_gmail.com District: Northside Historic District Classification: Key Contributing September 11, 2025 Project Scope: The project consists of replacing the deteriorated metal roof with architectural asphalt shingles and the removal of the internal gutters and their replacement with external gutters. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.6 Gutters and Downspouts 4.7 Mass and Rooflines Property History: This house was built between 1907 and 1912 in a transitional style between the waning Queen Anne Style and the large vernacular American Foursquare style. The cutaway corner and projecting bay on the east side are examples of the Queen Anne Style. The large square form with gabled dormers are elements of a traditional Foursquare, but the scale of the dormers reflects the gabled projections on a Queen Anne. The house has narrow lap siding, a standing seam metal roof, and one -over -one double -hung windows. The front porch has been enclosed and a small rear corner porch has also been enclosed. The large gabled rear projection may be original since it appears on the 1912 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map. In 2011, a Certificate of No Material Effect was issued for the removal a non -historic applique in the gable of the front porch. In 2017 a Certificate of No Material Effect was issued for the repair of the internal gutters and replacement of any deteriorated soffits and fascia found when the external gutters and downspouts were replaced. This same year approval through an Intermediate Review was given to replace and widen the driveway. In 2018, the Commission approved the installation of solar panels on the garage roof. In 2019, the Commission approved a rear covered entry and deck addition. Detailed Project Description: The goal of this project is the replacement of the deteriorated metal roof with architectural asphalt shingles. The rear projecting wing of the house has an internal gutter in the slope of the roof, known as a Yankee gutter. This gutter would be removed with the metal roof and could not be reconstructed with modern roof materials. Instead, an external gutter will be hung at the eave edge. The internal gutters on the porch roof and projecting bay are a different type that can be repaired and will remain. rmirlPlinPc- Section 4.6 Gutters recommends: • Repairing original built-in gutters. EPDM rubber sheeting is an economical replacement material for the original tin flashing. • Covering original built-in gutters and applying exterior gutters only if the roof slope at the gutter is not altered. Original Built-in Gutter Exception applicable to All Properties: • Removal of original built-in gutters unable to be repaired. On a case -by -case basis, the Commission may consider allowing removal of original built-in gutters if documentation is provided to establish evidence of need. This may include damage to the roof itself or inability to repair built-in gutters to properly working condition. Section 4.7 Mass and Rooflines recommends: • Maintaining metal roofs rather than replacing Replacement of Metal Roofs applicable to All Properties: • On a case -by -case basis, the Commission may consider allowing replacement of metal roofs with an approved alternative material if documentation is provided to establish evidence of need and off efforts to repair existing damage. Analysis. The existing metal roof was inspected by Justin Pardekooper of Pardekoper Construction. Mr. Pardekooper has experience painting and repairing metal roofs. He determined that the roof was too deteriorated to be repaired and recommends replacement. The applicant has chosen to replace the metal roof with architectural asphalt shingles. This house originally had a wood shingle roof and no gutters. Once the metal roof was installed, internal gutters were built by creating a trough in the slope of the roof. Removal of the metal roof will remove the internal gutters. This type of gutter cannot be constructed in the same way with new roofing materials, including new standing seam metal roofs. Similar gutters in the main hipped roof were removed in the past and external gutters were installed. The internal, Yankee gutters, on the rear portion of the house will be removed with the roof material with this project, necessitating the installation of external gutters. Although the guidelines recommend repairing both internal gutters and metal roofs, the guidelines include exceptions to allow replacement when it has been determined they are deteriorated beyond repair. The applicant has provided photographs showing the deterioration of the roof and gutters. Staff finds that removing the internal gutter on the rear projection will not impact the historic character of the house. Removing them will allow the existing roof slope to remain. Since the internal gutters at the east projecting bay and the front porch are more traditional, they can be repaired. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 317 Fairchild Street as presented in the staff report, which includes the replacement of a metal roof with architectural asphalt shingles and removal of the internal gutters on the rear of the house through the use of an exception to the guidelines to allow the removal of the internal gutters. y Illllii�� a III�ii —126;.4 317 Fairchild Street — Existing Rear (South) Elevation ~je - _ - �' ;: �': �°�•s ��� - -Sir _-� . r r' Sw Evidence of Deterioration 0 Evidence of Deterioration Y. Evidence of Deterioration Evidence of Deterioration 4 4. 1 ` .r _r1 Evidence of Deterioration Staff Report Historic Review for HPC25-0050: 721 Grant Street General Information: Applicant/Owner: Sarah Frank Contact person: Peter Correll, peter@icmartin.com District: Longfellow Historic District September 4, 2025 Classification: Contributing Project Scope: This project is the demolition of a single -story 1960s addition on the back of the house and the construction of a new shed roof addition with entry stoop and step in its place Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.1 Balustrades and Handrails 4.3 Doors 4.7 Mass and Rooflines 4.11 Siding 4.13 Windows 4.14 Wood 5.0 Guidelines for Additions 5.1 Expansion of Building Footprint 7.0 Guidelines for Demolition 7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures or Significant Features Property History: This house is a 1 '/2 -story side -gabled Craftsman bungalow built in 1923. The moderately pitched roof features a full-length shed -roof dormer on the front a back. The wide eaves are supported by decorative purlins. The house, columns of the subsumed porch, and the solid balustrade are clad with lap siding mitered at the corners. The lap siding extends to the base of the wall which is supported on a stucco -coated foundation. The windows are 4-over-1 double hung windows with a simple flat casing topped by a simple crown, serving as a drip edge. The house has a one-story rear addition that was built about 1960. In 2021, the Commission approved a similar demolition and addition at this house which was never completed. Detailed Project Description: This project demolishes the existing rear addition completed ca. 1960 and a small enclosure around a rear door. A new addition, roughly 19 foot by 16 foot, is constructed in its place. The addition is set back from the south wall of the historic house, preserving the west -facing window in that area. It is also set back from the north wall 2 feet (approximate depth of the eave overhang). A new stoop and step are located at the north side, extending beyond the north wall of the house. The addition has a shed roof that will tie in with the existing roof and overlap a portion of the existing dormers. The shed roof will match the slope of the dormer above but the eave will be slightly higher than the eave on the existing house. The siding will be a wood siding mitered at the corners and aligning with the existing siding on the house. Because of an existing mature tree, the addition will have a non-traditional foundation to minimize damage to the tree's roots. The stucco -coated foundation on house will be mimicked with the new foundation but the structure will be helical piers instead of a continuous footing and foundation wall. The addition will have pairs of windows with their heads and sills aligning with the first floor windows on the house. The windows at the kitchen counter will have raised sills to allow the counter to pass beneath them. The south wall will have no windows. Guidelines: Section 4.1 Balustrades and Handrails recommends: • Constructing or replacing missing balustrades by using historic photographs or by choosing a style that is consistent with the architectural style of the building. • Installing turned balusters in balustrades that have an actual diameter of 2 inches or greater, or square spindles that are 1-1/2 inches or greater in width. • Installing top and foot rails that are at least 2 inches in thickness. Section 4.2 Doors recommends: • Adding new door openings that are trimmed to match other doors and windows in the building. • Substituting a material in place of wood for doors and screen doors only if the substitute material retains the style and appearance of the historic doors and screen doors. The substitute material must be durable, accept paint, and be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Section 4.7 Mass and Rooflines recommends: • Preserving the original roof pitches and spans. • Preserving the original walls and vertical corners that define the massing of a historic building. Section 4.11 Siding recommends: • Substituting a material in place of wood siding only if the substitute material retains the appearance and function of the original wood. The substitute material must be durable, accept paint and be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. In many applications, fiber cement board with a smooth finish is an approved wood substitute. Section 4.13 Windows recommends: • Adding windows that match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of divided lights, and overall appearance of the historic windows. • Adding new windows in a location that is consistent with the window pattern of the historic building or buildings of similar architectural style. • Using new wood windows to replace deteriorated historic wood windows, although the use of metal -clad, solid -wood windows is acceptable. All replacement windows and trim must accept paint. Typically, sashes will be finished in a dark color, either black or dark green. • Divided lights may be true or simulated. Simulated divided lights may be created with muntin bars that are permanently adhered to both sides of the glass, preferably with spacer bars between the panes of insulating glass. Section 5.1 Expansion of the Building Footprint recommends: • Distinguishing between the historic structure and the new addition. This may be accomplished easily by offsetting the walls of the addition from the walls of the original structure or by connecting additions with a breezeway • Matching key horizontal "lines" on the existing building, such as water table, eave height, window head height and band boards, in order to provide continuity between the addition and the historic structure. • Using a palette of materials that is similar to that used on the historic structure. • Placing building additions at the rear of a property, if possible. • Installing doors in additions that match the material of historic doors, and have a similar style and appearance as the historic doors in the existing building. • Constructing an addition foundation that appears similar to the historic foundation in color, texture, unit size, and joint profile. • Constructing additions that are consistent with the massing and roofline of the historic building. This requires that the wall areas and corners, as well as the roof pitches and spans are all consistent with the existing building and have a proportion that is similar to that of the existing building. • Constructing the roof overhang, soffits and eaves of the addition so that they match the roof overhang, soffits and eaves of the existing building. When the eaves of an addition intersect the eaves of the existing building, care should be taken to assure that the two eaves align properly. The trim details of a new eave should match the eave details of the existing building. • Applying siding to a new addition that appears similar in size, shape, texture, and material to the existing siding on the historic building. • Using windows that are of a similar type, proportion and divided light pattern as those in the original structure. • Following the guidelines for new windows in section 4.13 Windows. • Constructing additions with materials that appear similar to the historic siding, trim, moldings, and other details of the original building. Disallowed: • Leaving large expanses of wall surface uninterrupted by windows or doors. Exceptions: • For additions to foundations, it is acceptable to match the color of the original foundation by using paint or masonry stain rather than matching the material and appearance of the original foundation material. • Window trim, door trim, fascia and frieze boards, and corner and band boards on additions must be similar to those on the historic building. However, other details of the historic building may be omitted, simplified, or enhanced on additions as long as they are compatible with the existing structure. Analysis: In Staff's opinion, the demolition of the 1960s addition and the construction of a new addition is appropriate. In 2021, the commission reviewed a similar project and approved an addition with two exceptions to the guidelines: one for the foundation and another for simplified trim since the addition would not have the brackets found on the main roof and both dormers. This new iteration will also need to utilize exceptions for these items. In addition, there are several other aspects of the current design that do not comply with the guidelines. While this addition likely has different goals from the 2021 design, the previous version shows that it is possible to design an addition for this house that better complies with the guidelines. The addition section of the guidelines begins with the following statement: "When planning an addition that expands the building footprint, consider first how a new exterior form and roof can be added to the existing house in a manner that is compatible with the design of the historic building. Often, the desired interior space dictates the location and size of the addition, and the resulting roofline and form appear awkward and inconsistent with the historic structure." When an addition is designed to fit with the exterior of the historic house first, the eave height and window patterning as well as setbacks and details are matched first and then the interior layout is designed to work with that. In this addition design the north wall is set in from the corner of the house 2 feet which allows the roof overhang to terminate inside the building corner but the new stoop and step project beyond the corner of the house at the driveway side of the house. Since the driveway is paved to the foundation wall, this projection will appear as if it is in the way especially since the garage is much wider than the historic driveway. Staff recommends that the addition is pulled back on the north wall to allow the stoop and step to terminate before the corner. The eave height in the new addition is higher than the eave height on the main house. Staff recommends that this eave height is lowered to match the main house roof. This will help maintain a similar relation between the overhang and the windows heads as is found on the historic house. The south wall of the addition proposes a completely windowless wall which is disallowed by the guidelines. Historic houses had windows on all sides to take advantage of natural light. Having views across rear yards and open space is a benefit that historic houses provided. Current construction practices often build new houses with windows in only two directions, a stark contrast with historic building practices. Staff recommends that the project is revised to provide windows on all three sides of the addition. The window section of the guidelines recommends that new windows are added "in a location that is consistent with the window pattern of the historic building or buildings of similar architectural style." The historic house has individual windows on all four sides. At the first floor on the porch, the house has one set of paired windows. All others are individual windows equally spaced. The fact that the front window is the only paired window makes it a special architectural feature. In this addition, the location of the windows has no relationship to the window patterning on the historic house. Many of the windows are paired instead of individual windows. On the west wall, the windows are not aligned beneath the dormer windows. As has been mentioned, there are no windows on the south wall. Staff recommends that the windows are revised to individual windows and the window patterning better reflects the window pattern on the historic house, including windows on the south side. This will allow the front window to remain an architectural feature on the front of this house. As with the 2021 project, staff recommends approving two exceptions for this project. While the guidelines recommend foundations on additions match the historic foundation, this project is attempting to preserve a valuable mature tree. The addition has been designed to be supported by drilled piers instead of a traditional foundation and was originally presented with skirting obscuring the structure on all sides. This use of skirting made the addition appear to be floating instead of fully supported. Skirting would only be appropriate under porches which are traditionally supported on masonry piers. The guidelines in section 5.1 allow for an exception for the new foundation to match the color of the original instead of the material. The addition will utilize a faux stucco texture to mimic the house's stucco -coated foundation. It will be installed on all three sides between the addition floor structure and the ground. Staff finds this to be an appropriate solution to the need for the addition to sit lightly over the tree's roots. Section 5.1 also includes an exception for wood that requires that "window trim, door trim, fascia.... on additions must be similar to those on the historic building. However, other details of the historic building may be omitted, simplified or enhanced on additions as long as they are compatible with the historic structure." The addition currently does not include the exposed rafter tails and corner brackets found in house including the existing rear dormer. This exception applies to setback (or rear) additions in historic districts. Since this addition is located on the rear of the house, the Commission may use this exception to approve these simplifications from the historic details. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 721 Grant Street as presented in the staff report through exceptions to the guidelines for the foundation and simplified trim, with the following conditions: ■ The north wall is set in so that the stoop and step terminate before the corner of the house and the eave height is lowered to match the house ■ Windows are added to the south wall of the addition and the windows are revised to reflect the window patterning on the historic house such as individual windows and window spacing. ■ Window and door product information is submitted for review f _ Old �,- � � � ., - ; �n �t3 �';.�`� '�� ►*� ��a ,yam V "�i it � ,r � ! ,_� 1 . � ' .e ,�j,�, ,�,� ..• .� 4• (( i ,a ✓ �r alp �+ , 1 R 708 US 712 ' 722 23 rI O 3.1 Ky e1�8 734728 R S87 r 741 738 i 746 747 Map 12 " = 1' -0 11 SHEET LIST G.O Al A.2 A.3 A.5 A.6 17� 7 721 72; rI 73' = RN 737 ' 741 747 Cover Sheet Overall Floor Plans Roof Plans Addition Plans Elevations - Existing Elevations - New 7070- F 708R58 712 718 J 722 728 732 r 736 F74 G I I parcel boundary cc �—---------+-\-------------- — 1 15'-6" \ 32' • \ - + 15'-0" 11 0 / 721 Grant St I I CV I 20'-0" oak tree ♦ I � I o L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- setback parcel boundary Site plan 1/ 1611 = 1' -0 11 Demo wood deck _ 1 Demolition Existing walls to remain Overall Demo Plan 1/811 = 1' -0 ° -------------------------- 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I A.3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 A.6 Overall Floor Plan 1/8-1 = 1' -0 11 A.6 08/11/25 scale 1/8- = 1.-0., Overall Floor Plans AA sheet Na. Demo roofs and gutters Existing Roof n Roof Plan - Demo 1 1/8" = 1'-011 Replace gutter & downspout n Roof Plan - New 178 tt = 1' -0 ti Gutter & downspout "—"�'* hingle roofing to match is closely as possible Replace gutter & downspout Flash and tie new roofing in to existing Existing roof to remain 08/11/25 Project North (4 Scale 1/8" = 1'-0" Roof Plans A■2 Sheet No. E C LL M. AI-7- a--7" rn 1-;?)Addition Ceiling Plan —1/411 =1t-011 Er a New electric meter 18' - 91/2" 51/2" T - 41/2" 2' - 8" 7' -11/2" 2' - 8" CE 2' -1" 1/2" 1 Z A.7 O 1 1 Lj I I O Z Built-in ® seating II - 00 O See cabinet I I drawings for details iN T� v -------------- Z Furniture by Owner III ® t N in — — O II � I I I I N a I III 4 R @ ±6114" R a O N 3 c, 5 --- --- N 2 o 1F— 7 If � Ref II II �� — — — — " — ---- Dining Rm 1 Addition Floor Plan 4/Arr = 11-Ott 3 r Kitchen HI DN 4 Wood decking r & railing 01 2- o -- __ 08/11/25 N N II I I � Revisions Closet Pantry I I i Powder Rm A.4 I I I I 1 ProjectN ft (4 Scan i 14 -1'-0" Addition Plans A.3 Sheet Ne. Second Floor Second Floor +9' - 81/2" +9' - 8 1/2" First Floor First Floor +0' - 0" 5 +0. - 0.. Lower Level -1'-9" I I I I I exist. foundation & basement I 1 3 East Elevation - Existing 1/8" = 1'-0 Second Floor Second Floor +9' - 81/2" +9' - 8 1/2" First Floor First Floor +0'-0" +0'-0" Lower Level Lower Level -1' - W. -1' - 9" I I I J I I L L L— J exist. foundation & basement I I I I South Elevation - Existing 1/8" = 1 f —0 11 I I I I I ---------- i------ — exist. foundation & I basement I I I 08/11/25 Revisions stele iia^ = r-o^ Elevations - Existing 1\ West Elevation - Existing 1/8" = 1'-011 North Elevation - Existing 1/8" = 1'-011 A.5 Sheet No. I I I I I I I exist. foundation & basement I I East Elevation - New 3 1/8 11 = 1' -0 11 II II II II II II it II II fir" V n West Elevation - New U 1/8 rr = 1' -0 rr Second Floor Second Floor ti +9' -8 1/2" +9' -8 1/2" First Floor LJ+0.-0 Second Floor +9' - 8 1/2" New electric meter First Floor �j+0.-0 Wood clapboard siding and trim to match existing; horizontal laps to align at connection to existing siding Stucco finish faux foundation Helical piers - see plan I FBI LF11 Wood clapboard siding and trim to match existing; horizontal laps to align at connection to existing siding First Floor +0.-0 — — — — — — — MUM I I I Stucco -finish faux foundation II I 1 L I � J I exist. foundation & basement I I I I South Elevation - New 1/8 11 = 1' -0 11 Second Floor +9'-81/2" First Floor +0 1 - 0,1 Wood clapboard siding and trim to match existing; horizontal laps to align at connection to existing siding i i painted wood stairs and railing exist. foundation & I stucco finish faux foundation basementL J n North Elevation - New 2 1/8" = 1'-0" Match existing lap siding mitered corners Staff Report September 11, 2025 Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner Historic Review for HPC25-0054: 622 N. Van Buren Street General Information: Owners: Kevin Boyd District: Brown Street Historic District Classification: Key Contributing Project Scope: In 1995, a previous owner added a second story rear deck and staircase. They also replaced a window with a door. The proposed project involves removing the rear deck and staircase and replacing the modern door with a window matching the historic window and replacing the siding that was removed to attach the deck to the house. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.13 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Windows 7.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Demolition 7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures of Significant Features Property History: This two-story Queen Anne is built in a gable -front and wing form with Free Classic details. The house has a main hipped roof with projecting gable wings to the front (west) and south. The south wing features a chamfered first floor bay with a square second floor. The rear fagade has a gabled through -wall dormer. The north side has a hipped through -wall dormer. The windows in the gables are paired. The siding is a wood lap siding with corner boards and a scalloped shingle siding in the gable ends. Classical details include the cornice returns on the gables, the dentils on the porch frieze and the classical columns. Prior to 1973, the house was duplexed with stairs to the second floor added to the north side. In 1995 the rear deck was built. The second -floor access was moved to the rear at this time. Detailed Project Description: The goal of this project is to remove the 1995 addition of a rear deck and staircase and replace the door added in the 90s with a window. The applicant has provided documentation showing the 1995 alteration and associated building permit application, as well as photos of the previous conditions. See attached. Guidelines: Section 4.13 Windows recommends: • Adding windows that match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of divided lights, and overall appearance of the historic windows. • Adding new windows in a location that is consistent with the window pattern of the historic building or building of similar architectural style. Section 7.1 recommends: • Removing additions or alterations that are not historic and that significantly detract from the building's historic character or that are structurally unsound and are a safety hazard. Analysis: The proposed project would result in the removal of a non -historic alteration, specifically the rear deck and staircase. It would also replace the existing rear door, which is also not original to the home, with a window as originally designed. Product details for the window have not been provided by the applicant, but the window would match the overall appearance of the historic windows and be made of wood or metal -clad wood. Staff finds that the proposed project aligns with the guidelines for demolition, as the deck and staircase are not historic. Additionally, the replacement of the door with a window also aligns with the guidelines since it will match the historic windows and maintain the window pattern. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 622 N. Van Buren Street as presented in the staff report, which includes the removal of the rear deck and staircase and the replacement of the associated door with a window. Applicant Materials: Building Permit Application BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OFIOWA CITY Application Date 6-- r.5,- —g.5- 1. Site Address: gQ X.-'-v S L OR Lot & Subdivision: Site Zone (to be completed by City Staff): 1 2. Owner or Tenant: I;fAllee- S Address: 45,22 '41,y'/,l/V B46<4-.1V s7. City: .-Ta 11-VA C t T Y state Zip .5--.04-- Work Phone: Home Phone: 3�t— 7 l-2 9 3. Contractor: .9 u.s C# �2 C 7-/--1-" Address: 5-/4-0 ""el4y C--/rq 1� ''r, -t/, 4EF!- t City: --To W�-`9 <I---rT Y state �.¢ r Zip Work Phone: .331 - G2 3 5� Home Phone: o -3- 5S 73 4. Project Description: !q /1 p C.<- tl'-' -S T.sr /X s v. Total Value of Project: $ :9-; Sri© , 0 0 (Exclude Cost of Lot and Cast of Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Work) Contact Person: a �} elf &62 SC/f 33f —0 35-- ck� A 1�3 %4 3z vi w! 41 k 14 LI) LI Tf ILI LU CL Vu Pf Staff Report September 3, 2025 Historic Review for HPC25-0056: 415 Clark Street General Information: Applicant/Owner: Kate Klefstad Contact person: Chucho Loria, cloria@cladarchitecture.com District: Clark Street Conservation District Classification: Contributing Project Scope: Construction of a new two-story garage at the southwest corner of the lot accessed by a new driveway and curb cut. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.3 Doors 4.11 Siding 4.12 Site and Landscaping 4.13 Windows 6.0 Guidelines for New Construction 6.2 New Outbuildings Property History: This house was originally built in 1939 as a two-story hipped -roof block with an attached single -story garage in the northeast corner. The smaller upper -floor windows are 6-over- 6 double -hung sash and the lower -level windows are 8-over-8 double -hung sash windows. The eave edge is punctuated by two segmental arched through wall dormers symmetrically spaced on each side of the house. Lower -level wide lap siding is bordered on the front fagade by a mid -level band at the height of the second floor windowsills. The cladding above may have originally been a stucco -coating. The house is a Colonial Revival style in a Regency -style variation. Elements of the Colonial Revival style are the hipped roof, symmetrical, three bay front facade, a formal central entrance and the stone, faux "quoins" at the corners. The Regency variation was loosely based on English precedents and was popular in the 1930s. Elements of this Regency variation are the somewhat simplified door surround (compared to other Colonial Revivals) and the small, shaped center window on the second floor. A single story addition on the NW corner was added prior to 1966. The larger hip -roof addition off the same corner was approved by the Historic Preservation Commission in 2005. Detailed Project Description: This project adds a two-story, two car garage to the southwest corner of the property. The garage will be similar to the house in that it will have a hipped -roof, similarly arched through -wall dormers on each side, wide lap siding with corner boards, and 6-over-6 double hung windows on three sides. The east elevation will have two single -car overhead doors. On the north side, a narrow projection will enclose the stairs to the upper floor which is an open living space with a restroom. The proposed siding is a smooth Hardie board, cement board siding. The proposed windows are a PVC -clad wood window. The overhead doors are composite material with additional composite overlays in a panel design similar to historic doors. They will have a band of small rectangular windows across the top. The passage door is a two panel fiberglass door with small window in a Craftsman style. r,i drlalinac- Section 4.3 Doors recommends: • Adding new door openings that are trimmed to match other doors and windows in the building. • Substituting a material in place of wood for doors and screen doors only if the substitute material retains the style and appearance of the historic doors and screen doors. The substitute material must be durable, accept paint, and be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Section 4.11 Siding recommends: • Substituting a material in place of wood siding only if the substitute material retains the appearance and function of the original wood. The substitute material must be durable, accept paint and be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. In many applications, fiber cement board with a smooth finish is an approved wood substitute. Section 4.12 Site and Landscaping recommends: • Providing parking behind the primary structure on a lot where possible. If parking must be located along the side of an existing or new primary structure, it must be set back from the front plane of the building a minimum of 10 feet and be screened by a decorative fence, landscaping, or a combination of a decorative fence and landscaping, and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. • Constructing new driveways to be similar to historic driveways in the neighborhoods. Typically these driveways are 8-10 feet in width. • Providing vehicular access from an alley when available. Driveways leading from the street to garages or parking at the rear of the property should be one lane in width, but can be widened toward the back of the lot to provide access to multi - stall garages or parking spaces. 4.13 Windows recommends: • Adding windows that match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of divided lights, and overall appearance of the historic windows. • Adding new windows in a location that is consistent with the window pattern of the historic building or buildings of similar architectural style. • Windows on outbuildings should be relatively small and rectangular or square. • Divided lights may be true or simulated. Simulated divided lights may be created with muntin bars that are permanently adhered to both sides of the glass, preferably with spacer bars between the panes of insulating glass. Section 6.2 New Outbuildings recommends: • Placing new outbuildings, including garages, to the rear of the primary building. • Constructing garages and other outbuildings that are clearly subordinate in size and ornamentation to the primary structure. • Constructing new outbuildings that reflect the style of the primary structure. The primary structure will typically reflect a style of architecture prevalent within the district. • Installing garage doors that are simple in design. Smooth or simple panel -type garage doors may be used. Carriage -style doors in a style appropriate to the property may also be used. • Adding trim around the garage door openings that matches the trim of other doors and windows on the building. • Installing single -car garage doors. Double -car garage doors are discouraged. Windows • Incorporating windows into the design that are relatively small and rectangular. Analysis: In Staff's opinion, the construction of a new garage in the rear corner of the yard will create additional parking, useable space on the upper floor, and allow the historic attached garage to remain in place, retaining the historic character of this property. The creation of a second curb cut, provides driveway access to the new garage while maintaining the original cub cut retains the historic link between the original building and the public right-of-way. With the proximity of the north property line, it was not possible to expand the historic garage. A lack of alley in the back requires additional access from the street. This Regency style is rare in Iowa City. The new garage reflects that style in form and roof line, the dormer configuration, the window type, and the wide lap siding. Instead of copying the more elaborate front fagade with the upper -level cladding and quoins, it reflects the rear and additions with the lap siding, corner boards, and frieze board. The smooth cement board and proposed overhead doors comply with the guidelines. There are several elements needing clarification, discussion, or approval through exception to the guidelines. In the drawings, the gutter is shown continuous through the dormers on a couple sides. Staff has asked the architect to revise the drawings to break the gutter into separate sections. As can be seen on the front of the house, this roof line and dormer configuration means that the gutter is continuous at the building corners and downspouts are located at the breaks by the dormers, extending down the middle of the wall instead of the traditional corners. In addition, the front of the new garage is shown with three dormers instead of two. This detail is more elaborate than the house and will lead to an additional downspout. Staff recommends that the front fagade of the garage is simplified to two dormers in order to avoid a more elaborate design than the house and to simplify the downspout situation. The eave condition on the garage is also shown with an eave overhang that is at least twice as deep as that on the house. Staff recommends that this is narrowed to better reflect the roof condition in the Regency style. The trim on the new garage is not clearly shown and the material is not specified. Staff recommends a simple 4-inch (minimum) flat casing in wood. Alternative trim materials have not been commonly approved by the Commission; wood trim is approved instead. Flat casing would be appropriate in this building and since it is not masonry, brickmold would not be appropriate on any of the doors and windows. The proposed windows are a vinyl -clad wood window. The guidelines in Section 4.13 includes an exception for windows in new outbuildings in conservation districts for the Commission to approve vinyl -clad wood windows. The proposed passage door is a fiberglass Craftsman -style door. Staff recommends that the door is revised as a Colonial Revival -style door such as a door with a cross -buck pattern in the lower half and a nine-lite window in the upper half, or a four -panel door with four arched windows across the top, or a simple single - panel door with a single half-lite above. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 415 Clark Street as presented in the staff report with the following conditions: ■ The vinyl -clad windows are approved through an exception to the guidelines ■ The eave is revised with a non -continuous gutter at the dormers, a narrower overhang, and two dormers in the front fagade. ■ The trim is revised with corner boards, a frieze board at the top of the wall, and flat casing at all doors and windows. ■ The passage door is revised to a Colonial Revival Style. ��_ _ � ' • �''� '-� I T � •�. .. ��''�P y� ter+ `� � .. _ �Y 415 Clark Street, rear addition at Northwest corner, 2006 I I � I ; I ; I � I ; I � I ; I ; I ; I ; I ; I ; I � I ; I ; I ; I ; I ; —r• I PROPFRTV I IAIC I I I I I I I i i i i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w! ZI J• cc �I aI OI aI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY LINE —•—•—•—•—•—•—• ...... ...... ...... _ ................. I I I i i i i Al A-101 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN i i I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I'a m .O _ Im 7° iz m I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I X J W G N Y J 3 W G N FROM GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. WALLS TO BE TYPE G4.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REPAIR AND PATCH CONCRETE FLOOR WHERE DAMAGED OR UNFINISHED RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION WORK. 4. WHEREVER DEMOLITION OF WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, CASEWORK, OR OTHER ITEMS RESULTS IN EXPOSED, UNFINISHED EDGES, PLANES, OR FACES OF ADJOINING WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, ETC., THESE UNFINISHED ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED, PATCHED, AND FINISHED WITH LIKE/COMPATIBLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 5. WHERE REMOVAL OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND TELECOM ITEMS, LEAVES HOLES IN THE EXISTING WALLS, FLOORING, FLOOR SLAB, CEILINGS, AND/OR ROOF DECK, CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL HOLES LEFT FROM REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS TO MATCH ADJACENT ASSEMBLY AND SURFACE PRIOR TO REFINISHING. 6. WHERE EXISTING OPENINGS IN MASONRY WALLS ARE TO BE FILLED WITH SIMILAR MASONRY UNITS, TOOTH -IN SOLID BRICK OR CMU AT JAMBS. 7 REFER TO THE UNDER -SLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONALAREAS OF PATCHING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDER -SLAB PIPING NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. LINE TO CURB 3 FT RADI H W W Y a J U W WW 113 Wright Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ 319-351-9214 cladarchitecture.com RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION 415 CLARK IOWA IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 25.008 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS ATTHE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. © CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC OWNER: KATHERINE IMBOREK & KATE KLEFSTAD ISSUED: XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A=101 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 12' Al A-102 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN EXISTING HOME GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. WALLS TO BE TYPE G4.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REPAIR AND PATCH CONCRETE FLOOR WHERE DAMAGED OR UNFINISHED RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION WORK. 4. WHEREVER DEMOLITION OF WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, CASEWORK, OR OTHER ITEMS RESULTS IN EXPOSED, UNFINISHED EDGES, PLANES, OR FACES OF ADJOINING WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, ETC., THESE UNFINISHED ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED, PATCHED, AND FINISHED WITH LIKE/COMPATIBLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 5. WHERE REMOVAL OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND TELECOM ITEMS, LEAVES HOLES IN THE EXISTING WALLS, FLOORING, FLOOR SLAB, CEILINGS, AND/OR ROOF DECK, CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL HOLES LEFT FROM REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS TO MATCH ADJACENT ASSEMBLY AND SURFACE PRIOR TO REFINISHING. 6. WHERE EXISTING OPENINGS IN MASONRY WALLS ARE TO BE FILLED WITH SIMILAR MASONRY UNITS, TOOTH -IN SOLID BRICK OR CMU AT JAMBS. 7 REFER TO THE UNDER -SLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS OF PATCHING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDER -SLAB PIPING NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. W I � I T 113 Wright Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 J 319-351-9214 cladarchitecture.com RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION 415 CLARK IOWA IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 255.008 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS AT THE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. © CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC OWNER: KATHERINE IMBOREK & KATE KLEFSTAD ISSUED: XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A=102 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 0 4' 8' 12' Al A-104 ROOF LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = V-0" ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF SLOPE TO MATCH EXISTING HOME ROOF PREFINISHED ALUM. GUTTERS & DOWNSPOUTS 0 4' 8' 12' GENERAL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF STUD OR MASONRY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. WALLS TO BE TYPE G4.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. REPAIR AND PATCH CONCRETE FLOOR WHERE DAMAGED OR UNFINISHED RESULTING FROM DEMOLITION WORK. 4. WHEREVER DEMOLITION OF WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, CASEWORK, OR OTHER ITEMS RESULTS IN EXPOSED, UNFINISHED EDGES, PLANES, OR FACES OF ADJOINING WALLS, CEILINGS, FLOORS, ETC., THESE UNFINISHED ELEMENTS SHALL BE REPAIRED, PATCHED, AND FINISHED WITH LIKE/COMPATIBLE MATERIALS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 5. WHERE REMOVAL OF ITEMS REQUIRED BY THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND TELECOM ITEMS, LEAVES HOLES IN THE EXISTING WALLS, FLOORING, FLOOR SLAB, CEILINGS, AND/OR ROOF DECK, CONTRACTOR SHALL PATCH ALL HOLES LEFT FROM REMOVAL OF THESE ITEMS TO MATCH ADJACENT ASSEMBLY AND SURFACE PRIOR TO REFINISHING. 6. WHERE EXISTING OPENINGS IN MASONRY WALLS ARE TO BE FILLED WITH SIMILAR MASONRY UNITS, TOOTH -IN SOLID BRICK OR CMU AT JAMBS. 7 REFER TO THE UNDER -SLAB MEP PIPING PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL AREAS OF PATCHING CONCRETE FLOORS FOR UNDER -SLAB PIPING NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. W I � I T 113 Wright Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 J 319-351-9214 cladarchitecture.com RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION 415 CLARK IOWA IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 255.008 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS AT THE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. © CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC OWNER: KATHERINE IMBOREK & KATE KLEFSTAD ISSUED: XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION ROOF PLAN Am104 411 OL 4po" min loin] j 6 Aw r W,01 �,44 64 'air, -49 41t <C U t�{ 's `fit//yC'�y��.i ��1I'i��M\a� •�•.'1M'i' '-.w !.. A. , - vql 4w � MINIM 40, A e, AVr_- lw low ilkPI 4k_ A 711: VoI r 6 PC WI r --a AwAll Al A-202 BUILDING ELEVATION SOUTH SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" BUILDING ELEVATION WEST SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" 2 ROOF +91-011 1 UPPER LEVEL +0„ 0 MAIN LEVEL -8'-6„ -1 BASEMENT LEVE 0 2' 4' 8' +18'-0" 2 ROOF +91-011 1 UPPER LEVEL +0„ 0 MAIN LEVEL -8'-6" -1 BASEMENT LEVE 0 2' 4' 8' W W Z 113 Wright Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ 319-351-9214 cladarchitecture.com RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION 415 CLARK IOWA IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 25.008 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS ATTHE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. © CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC OWNER: KATHERINE IMBOREK & KATE KLEFSTAD ISSUED: XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION SOUTH & WEST ELEVATION Am202 ENDLESS DESIGN POSSIBILITIES nistinctive design, engineered to last. Hardie' Artisan Siding NOW PART OF THE HARDIE"' ARCHITECTURAL COLLECTION. Offering gorgeous, deep shadow lines and extra thick boards, Hardie" Artisan siding will set your home apart. The 5/8-inch thickness and unique features of Hardie" Artisan siding provide precise fit and finish as well as the freedom to miter corners for attractive, streamlined styling. LOCK JOINT SYSTEM Hardie`R' Artisan siding flat wall profiles have a lock joint system that helps enable faster, cleaner installation. Orient vertically, horizontally or use as soffit. MITERED CORNERS Add sophistication to your design with mitered corners that can be crafted on -site with any Hardie" Artisan profile. Lock Joint Mitered Corners iiiMIIIIIIIIIl U NEW SIDING LAYOUT SHALL MATCH EXISTING Hardie' Artisan Siding LAP SIDING Shiplap V - (', rn Baer+° Lap Siding Width 7.25 in (6 in exposure) Length 12 ft Pcs/Pallet 1 144 Thickness 5/8 in 8.25 in (7 in exposure) 12 ft 125 Finish Primed Primed SMOOTH FINISH FLAT WALL PROFILES Thickness 5/8 in Width 10.25 in (9 in exposure) Length 12 ft Pcs/Pallet Finish V-Groove Width Length Pcs/Pallet Finish Square Channel Width Length Pcs/Pallet Finish 105 Primed Thickness 5/8 in 8.25 in (7 in exposure) 12 ft fiW101 Primed Thickness 5/8 in 10.25 in (9 in exposure) 12 ft 105 Primed Product Catalog Rnnacle Double Huna & Glide -by J WOOD FRAMED/COMPOSITE CELLULAR PVC CLAD WINDOWS Features and Benefits Glazing Clad Colors • The warmth and beauty of Clear Select • Windsor Glazing System provides 3/4" All clad colors painted in-house with the Pine, Douglas Fir or Natural Alder; can be double pane insulated glass; Cardinal° highly durable AAMA 2604 standard finish, painted or stained LoE 366 glass standard; Itinted, tempered, or upgrade to AAMA 2605 for the most • Clad units offer a strong, durable obscure and laminated glass available challenging of environments extruded aluminum sash and frame for • Glazed with tape and silicone sealant • 24 Standard Clad Colors available in 2604 low maintenance; primed units offer the • Custom and special glass types available and 2605 finish traditional appearance of decorative • Preserve protective film optional • 20 Feature Clad Colors available in 2604 cellular PVC trim and 2605 finish (Custom color matching • Glass is replaceable in case of damage Exterior Trim is also available) • Both tape and silicone glazed, with • 7 Matte Clad Colors available in the 2604 interior wood stops for superior strength finish only and seal WINDOW TRIM PROFILE • EZ Tilt operation available for easy Hardware removal and replacement of sash SHALL MATCH EXISTING Double hung lock available in champagne, (double hung only) fiat ige, williamsburg, 3-112" fiat, 4- 1 i2 white, =and black; optional finishes in backband, 5-1/2" flat or plantation casi� faux bronze, oil rubbed bronze, satin nickel double hung sill nose. 2" hi ill nr:r:^ sill and bright brass nose or belly sill nose • All prime window trims, :,iii iiu.,e a,u Performance Ratings )utside stops are cellular PVC For current performance ratings, visit our website at windsorwindows.com and click Grilles on "Professional Information" in the menu bar • Both sashes tilt in with compression or Windsor Divided Lite (WDL) = simulated divided lite concealed jambliner for easy cleaning . 7/8" and 1-1/4" Perimeter Grille (NOT • Recessed lock and keeper for a sleek available on radius double hung) appearance • 7/8" and 1-1/4" Stick Grille • 3/4" and 1 " Profiled Inner Grille • 13/16" Flat Inner Grille • 7/8" and 1-1/4" Ogee WDL • 5/8", 7/8", 1-1 /4" and 2" Short Putty WDL • 5/8", 7/8", 1-1/4" and 2" Short Contemporary WDL • 2" Simulated Check Rail (DHpicture only) • Standard and custom grille patterns • Block and tackle balance system for ease available of operation • Prime double hung units come standard Finishes with cellular PVC trim, blind stop and sill • Interior — Available in Clear Select Pine, • No -finger pull option for hardware Douglas Fir or Natural Alder application — Primed: white or black — Painted: white, black or gray Sizes — Stained: 9 color options Available in hundreds of standard and • Exterior — Clad windows feature heavy - custom sizes duty extruded aluminum cladding on SEE PLANS FOR SIZES sash and frame; primed windows (double hung only) offer an assortment of traditional cellular PVC trim options COORDINATE/VERIFY ALL WINDOW UNIT AND HARDWARE FINISHES WITH THE OWNER www.windsorwindows.com 10/2023 DESCRIPTION: PINE WOOD -FRAMED, COMPOSITE CELLULAR PVC -CLAD WINDOW ASSEMBLY. MANUFACTURER: WINDSOR MODEL/TYPE: LINE: PINNACLE, WOOD PRIME DOUBLE HUNG. FINISH: INTERIOR: AS SELECTED BY OWNER/ARCHITECT. EXTERIOR: FACTORY PRIMED/SITE PAINTED. COLOR AS SELECTED BY OWNER/ARCHITECT. GLAZING: INSULATING, LOW-E; CLEAR. GRAY. GRAY SPACER. HARDWARE: BRONZE. ACCESSORIES: PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED JAMB EXTENSIONS AND ACCESSORIES. EXTERIOR WINDOW TRIM SHALL MATCH EXISTING PERFORMANCE: U-VALUE: 0.28; SHGC: 0.18; VT: 0.41; CR: 60. W W U Ef 113 Wright Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 J 319-351-9214 cladarchitecture.com RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION 415 CLARK IOWA IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 255.008 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS ATTHE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. © CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC OWNER: KATHERINE IMBOREK & KATE KLEFSTAD ISSUED: XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION PRODUCT INFORMATION A=601 SIDING WINDOWS f f- It i I x.6 Roaring Twenties Innovative Construction Features: 1. Laminated, insulated core to increase energy efficiency and reduce noise 2. Heavy-duty wood frame at all fastening points 3. Impenetrable composite surrounds create the interlocking tongue and groove to seal out the elements and increase sustainability 4. Precision -machined architectural relief in solid 3/a' high -impact composite face 10 4a 4h. 4c 4d 4a. Smooth 4b, V-Groove (shown here) 4c. Beadboard 4d. Custom designs 5. Square edged smooth, solid composite 1/2" overlays are inlaid (pocketed) for durability 6. Prefinished interior cover to protect your door (optional composite interior backer pg. 27) Glazed Grille Top Options Traditional: 1" Vertical Muntins across whole grille: arch or square Standard on: AL, PR, RT Available on: All Series L tJrIE-1 [TIFT] Euro: 3 112" Vertical Muntins in center of bay: arch or square Standard on: EU Available on: All Series i C-Grille: Bead with Radiused Inside Corners Standard on: EU, PR, AL Available on: All Series SINGLE ARCH Isla 'soon MEMO SEEN ■■N DOUBLE ARCH marls ORION. Now-onIN ■on■ ���■ ���� NINE COLONIAL Now OWN RECTANGLE LITES I d **Standard i / **TDL **Extruded Aluminum fr GARAGE DOOR 7 Fully -customizable designs for solid sections and glass sections 8. Traditional style grille (pg. 28) with optional interior grille (pg. 27) 9. Standard glass section profile: V-Grille (see pg. 28) 10, Standard: 3 sections with customizable height, width, and top options 11, Overall section thickness is 1 t3"6" 12. Slab doors available (consult dealer) Design your own, or count on one of ours! Customize to meet your needs, Solid tops available, see website for further options: www.fimbelads.com. CUSTOM MODERN CUSTOM SCROLL CUSTOM ELLIPTICAL AND TEMPLATE ARCH �liveSol 11111 ,�rr C( Further upgrades and custom options (see page 26) * Please refer to Fimbel warranty on page 29 for terms and conditions. V-Grille: Putty Bar with Sharp Inside Corners, \ Standard on: RT, RP DESCRIPTION: COMPOSITE LAMINATED, INSULATED GARAGE DOOR ASSEMBLY. ,= Available on: All Series MANUFACTURER: FIMBEL ARCHITECTURAL DOORS. TYPE/MODEL: ROARING TWENTIES STYLE, MODEL: DETROIT RT11-S. GRILLE LAYOUT: EURO STYLE. V GRILLE PROFILE. �— ■ FINISH: STANDARD FACTORY FINISH. COLOR AS SELECTED BY OWNER/ARCHITECT. dGrille Frame Shown" GLAZING: INSULATING, LOW-E,- CLEAR. GRAY. GRAY SPACER. Frame Available** ■ HARDWARE: STANDARD. POWERED OPENER. used on American Legends Doors** ACCESSORIES: PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED JAMB EXTENSIONS AND ACCESSORIES. PERFORMANCE: U-VALUE: 0.3-1 SHGC: 0.2-1 VT: 0.46-1 CR: 59. W II Ill T 0 113 Wright Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 J 319-351-9214 cladarchitecture.com RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION 415 CLARK IOWA IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 255.008 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS AT THE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. © CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC OWNER: KATHERINE IMBOREK & KATE KLEFSTAD ISSUED: XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION PRODUCT INFORMATION A=602 W Engineered to work together. The Craftsman Doors & Sidelites IHERMA11RU' A Therma-Tru, door system with genuine Therma-Tru components is engineered with craftsman precision for durability DOORS and reliability through the years. From the door slab and glass to the hinges and sill, Therma-Tru specifies each piece 3 A Yfc to work together at the most critical points where an ordinary door system's performance can fail. So when a homeowner chooses a complete Therma-Tru door system, you can be confident it will perform as � I I exceptionally as it looks. You're in expert hands with Therma-Tru, the most preferred brand of entry doors. t W Year after year, building professionals rank Therma-Tru #1 - as the brand they use ��-�'� ' Both Classic -Craft 3 most.** It's a reputation built on more than 50 years of experience and technical BEST BUY and Fiber -Classic - are rated a know-how. Therma-Tru introduced the world to fiberglass doors and continues to Consumers Digest m make door systems that are held to high standards for quality and performance. �" Best Buy in the Classic-Cr " & Fiber -CI fiberglass entry That's where the beauty of choosing Therma-Tru begins. Entry Doo doors category. oo� m _ Door Selections - Q The beautyof a Therma-Tru. door is easy to see, no matter how you look at it. _ Y Y ----, - � � 0 m' What makes our doors even more beautiful? Choice. A premium entryway that — - - i �� 113 W right Street, © can truly express your style. Or the look and feel of real wood with excellent 74' e _ Iowa City, Iowa 52240 J performance and value. , - _ . 319 - 3 51- 9 214 cladarchitecture.com �l I — ram' RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION -. - �,�P 415 CLARK IOWA p -M111111114--4 ��` _ - - f IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 25.008 Classic -Craft,, Fiber -Classic. 116 - American Style Collection,. Mahogany ' ' k DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, �"�6 ;• `i }� EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE A touch of true Craftsman appeal. FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS ATTHE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, - TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. • — _ (0 CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC Smooth -Star® -- ©� OWNER: _ 'Based on a nationwide survey of consumers' estimates of perceived home value based on exterior appearance. K A T H E R I N E I M B O R E K& Not based on actual home sales. Results may vary based on region and home style. Therma-Tru's "National Home Valuation Study" was commissioned by Therma-Tru in 2015 and conducted by TINS, an independent provider of KATE KLEFSTAD O internet-based research. **Brand use study, 2017 Builder magazine. LIFETIMEFROM,,S - - Note: Finish colors may vary from an actual application due to fluctuations in finishing or printing. See your Therma-Tru seller or visit www.thermatru.com for details on limited warranties and exclusions, and ENERGY STAR ' 2 qualified products. 3 Required Components for Tru-Defense Door System** with Therma Tru Fiberglass Door Slab & Components - Door FraiI Corner Seal Pads rr Provides a solid structure for (Inswing Only) the door slab and components. Fit securely behind the Recommended: Therma-Tru weatherstrip to help block Composite Door Frame wind -driven moisture infiltration 6. at the bottom corner of the Ci) door system. All os °ir Composite Adjustable Sill rr ftftftftft Provides a solid stepping surface Weatherstrip ale s and forms a tight seal at the bottom Features a resilient design of the door system to help channel to help deliver a precise seal moisture away from the home. between the door and frame. Bottom Sweep mD' (Inswing Only) Astragal 4, (Double Doors) A dual -bulb, dual -fin design Covers the margin between helps maintain tight contact with double doors to help complete adjustable sill caps and creates the seal against air and moisture added barriers against moisture. infiltration, with aluminum construction for stability, 38-714" 1R.G � holding power and durability. 1 �� Hinges nOm Ensure smooth operation and Rain Guard position the door so it creates a ' #I�IfI�G' tight seal with the weatherstrip (Outswing Only) h � when closed. Creates a barrier at the top - 3' - I�``�°') � IMAGE VIEWED FROM EXTERIOR of the door to protect against _ ,,�q�1 a fo. , moisture infiltration. SPECIFICATIONS - Recommended Components U.D.= 37-1/2" x 81-5/8°;R.o.=38-1/4"x82" O.M.of EXTERIOR TRIM = 40-1/8"x82-15/16" ISSUED: Multi -Point Locking System 0 XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION (MPLS) ITEM DESCRIPTION Engages the door and frame at Sill Pan 0 TO" X 68" S4810-LE, SMOOTH -STAR, SHAKER -STYLE FIBERGLASS DOOR W/LOW E GLASS. three points from top to bottom Adds an extra layer of protection to help keep moisture RIGHT HAND INSWING (TRU-GUARD COMPOSITE EDGE) for enhanced security and sealing. away from the subfloor; protects flooring by catching 2-3/4" BACKSET - DOUBLE BORE (2-1/8" DIA. BORE W/STANDARD 5-1/2" SPACING) W/FACE PLATE LOCKSET and draining water in the event of infiltration. LATCH PREP W/ STANDARD STRIKE PREP W/ DEADBOLT 9202 THERMA-TRU 2-1/41, FULL LIP STRIKE PREP SET OF BALL BEARING - BLACK NICKEL HINGES Levels of Reimbursement WHITE DELUXE ALUMINUM CLAD FRAME W/ PRIMED DURA-FRAME INTERIOR - 4-9/16" JAMB System Reimbursement Eligibility W/ CLASSIC BRICK MOULD EXTERIOR TRIM (APPLIED) W/(2)BLACK NICKEL ADJUSTABLE SECURITY STRIKE Components PLATES (FOR LOCKSET AND DEADBOLT) Latch & Deadbolt (No Sill Pan)*** $250 $500 BRONZE COMPRESSION WEATHERSTRIP DESCRIPTION: FIBERGLASS DOOR. Latch & Deadbolt with Sill Pan*** $500 $1,000 TRU-DEFENSE COMPOSITE ADJ. W/ DARK CAP - BRONZE SILL MANUFACTURER: THERMA TRU; SMOOTH -STAR LINE. MPLS (No Sill Pan) $1,000 $2,000 TRU-LOC DOOR ANCHORS - INSTALLED MODEL: S4810 PRODUCT MPLS with Sill Pan $1,250 $2,500 FINISH: DOOR AND FRAME FACTORY -PRIMED AND PAINTED ON SITE. COLOR AS SELECTED BY OWNER/ARCHITECT. INFORMATION Baseline components required to qualify for the Tru-Defense Warranty Rider. Look for components with the (.:.) icon. GLAZING: INSULATING; CLEAR. SAFETY/TEMPERED AS REQ'D BY CODE 7 HARDWARE: BRONZE HINGES AND HARDWARE. ACCESSORIES: WEATHER -STRIPING SEALS AND ALUMINUM THRESHOLD. A=603 SWING DOOR p Al SK01 r PERSPECTIVE VIEW FROM EXTERIOR SIDEWALK PROPOSED NEW CURB CUT - - _ _ _ . ��f -.tea ��.< "' ._ � � `�� ► ` � �i �j "-7 JA it -, - _ -' " _ - - '-�!�'"_ .' ma's _- -_ _ _-''�••�.. 1*i :, .�. .'_ .. -_ y'' .•t'_. � >T - -r rl W W U W Z CC a 113 Wright Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 J 319-351-9214 cladarchitecture.com RESIDENCE GARAGE ADDITION 415 CLARK IOWA IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 PROJECT NUMBER: 255.008 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT. THEY ARE NOT TO BE USED ON EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT, OR OTHER PROJECTS, EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT IN WRITING AND APPROPRIATE COMPENSATION TO THE ARCHITECT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFIRMING AND CORRELATING DIMENSIONS ATTHE JOB SITE. THE ARCHITECT WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROJECT. © CLAD ARCHITECTURE, LLC OWNER: KATHERINE IMBOREK & KATE KLEFSTAD ISSUED: XX/XX/2020_ISSUE DESCRIPTION PERSPECTIVE VIEW SK01 SCALE:1' = 1'-01, 0 1/2" 1" 2" MINUTES PRELIMINARY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 14, 2025 —5:30 PM —FORMAL MEETING E M M A J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Margaret Beck, Kevin Burford, Andrew Lewis, Ryan Russell, Deanna Thomann, Nicole Villanueva, Frank Wagner MEMBERS ABSENT: Austin Curfman, Carl Brown STAFF PRESENT: Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Jennifer Miller, Chad Miller, Matt Pemble CALL TO ORDER: Lewis called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: HPC25-0036: 311 Brown Street - Brown Street Historic District (front porch roof replacement and removal of internal gutter, removal and replacement of crown molding): Russett noted this is a contributing property in the Brown Street Historic District, the home was built in 1898 and is a two story wood frame home that incorporates aspects of both Victorian and Georgian Revival architecture. The house retains its original front porch and features a complex roof pattern with returned cornices, which is a special feature of the house. The item tonight is related to the front porch roof and some modifications that need to be made to properly function, a portion of the roof has been repaired but Russett showed photographs provided by the applicant of some standing water on it. She shared another photo and pointed out the gutters look quite shallow and the issues that the applicant is having with this roof is that it's not properly draining and it's causing damage to both the floor of the porch, as well as some of the trim and crown molding around the roof. The applicants were originally proposing to cut out the internal gutters and to remove the crown molding and then replace the crown molding and re -roof the front porch. After some more discussions internally and with the applicants, staff is recommending an alternative solution that will not impact the historical character of the house but solve their water problems. Staff is recommending to fill in the internals gutters and add sheathing and then roof over the gutter and the roof with EPDM, which is a membrane roof. Russett noted the guidelines that relate to gutters recommend repairing original built in gutters. Regarding mass and roof lines, it's important to preserve historic trim, such as crown molding and decorative material, and the section on demolition also disallows removing any architectural features such as decorative trim. She noted there is an exception in the gutter section of the guidelines that allow the Commission to approve the removal of built in gutters that are unable to be repaired and this can be done on a case by case basis if the gutter is not able to be repaired and properly function. Additionally, staff can administratively approve replacing an existing metal roof on a front porch with EPDM. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION August 14, 2025 Page 2 of 5 Staff recommends approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 311 Brown Street to fill in the internal gutters on the front porch roof, add sheathing as needed, and roof over the metal roof and gutters with EPDM through the use of an exception to remove the internal gutters, since they continue to poorly function causing water damage. Burford asked if gutters would be put in place of the internal ones or would there just be no gutters at all. Russett stated staff recommends half rounds on the external portion of the front porch. Thomann asked if using the half rounds would all the trim and the molding be preserved. Russett explained yes, the original proposal was to impact that, but what staff is recommending is not to impact that, just fill the gutter in, add the sheathing, add the new roof material and leaving the crown molding in place. Thomann asked if the half round gutter then cover or conceal the crown molding. Russett stated it may cover a portion of the crown molding, but with the half rounds it will show more of the historic trim than a case style gutter. Jennifer Miller (311 Brown Street) stated when they moved into this house in 2021 they met with Jessica Bristow on site and learned about this process. In 2022 they called the people on the list and most people say they can't do this kind of repair so they got the front porch and back porch patched and repeated that in 2023. In 2024 they were told by their insurance that they were going to be kicked off their insurance because of the age of the roof. Luckily, they found new insurance just in the nick of time this summer. In 2024 they gathered bids from people including $32,000 for a whole new roof, which is outside of their budget, but at the beginning of 2025 they met with Bristow and Russett again to discuss how they could get their porch fixed for the sake of the house. Miller wanted to stress that they've been proactive and have called the contractors from the list but that had to be expanded because so many people said they wouldn't do it. Finally, they found Tomlinson Cannon and feel like their proposal and their suggestions are sound. She acknowledged they lost a lot of time as it's already August and they really wanted to make this happen for the sake of the house. Chad Miller (311 Brown Street) added when they first moved in there was already dripping and leaking through the porch roof, both front and back, damaging the soffit, the porch, the front steps. Yes they had it patched but patches don't last and the leaks come back. He can see out from their bedroom to the gutter on the northwest corner and it's practically flat. The water is supposed to go north, then east and around the corner and then south, but at that corner there's really no slope there so it goes right over the roof and into a standing puddle situation. Therefore, by patching the roof it just makes a longer lasting puddle. He doesn't see how to fix that and how to recreate enough slope and enough fall to make that flow properly. He doesn't know how to do that without rebuilding it completely. Miller reiterated they do not want to change anything architecturally for the historic value, they just want something that functions because the porch is getting destroyed, the soffit is getting destroyed, and those are also historic features that are actually more visible than the gutter. Matt Pemble (Exterior Operation Manager, Thomlinson Cannon) has been a finished carpenter in the field for 21 years and been in the construction industry for 30 years. Thomlinson Cannon has been around in Iowa City since 1948 doing gutters, but internal gutters, the built in systems are a poor design and the problem is everything's internal. They leak, they clog, there is settling, they cause other issues. It is hard to keep maintenance on internal gutters because you don't see it, at least not until it starts getting too late. Thomlinson Cannon doesn't do repairs on internal gutters, a lot of companies don't repair Yankee gutters because they fail, so their proposal was to redo the roof and close off the built in gutters because they're causing problems with the soffit internally. Because the gutters are built into the roof system they're causing potentially structural damage to the roof and they don't know how bad until HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION August 14, 2025 Page 3 of 5 they open it up. Again, their proposal was to try to preserve as much as they can, yes the half round will be visible but they will still be able to see the crown molding and the crown molding can be fixed and preserved. The half round would have to be applied with straps because of the crown molding there's no fastener to go straight into the fascia but they wouldn't see the straps except where they barely come up and still be able to see the crown molding. Thomann asked how they fill in those gutters. Pemble explained they will go over the tin with half inch OSB, putting a wood structure, kind of like a roof decking, all completely over. They will build pitch wedges, to get the proper slope on the front porch roof but also getting the slope so the water will come down into the gutter system, wrap it around. Thomann asked if the half round gutters are something typically seen on that era of house. Pemble replied absolutely and a lot of the historical homes around Iowa City still have half rounds. They've came a long way with half rounds, they used to come in 10 foot sections and were put together, now they have the opportunity to have a seamless machine to make them continuous. Additionally, they can still use the downspouts on the older homes or they can get the round down spouts that aren't like the typical modern ones now. Thomann noted they don't generally have much to say about gutters but was just curious about the style. MOTION: Villanueva moves to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 311 Brown Street to fill in the internal gutters on the front porch roof, add sheathing as needed, and roof over the metal roof and gutters with EPDM through the use of an exception to remove the internal gutters, since they continue to poorly function causing water damage. Beck seconded the motion. Burford noted there are a lot of interior gutters built into the houses on Brown Street, he has them on his house, and standing water goes with interior gutters they can't really escape it. He stated they are more esthetic, in his view, than the half rounds, however he understands the practical need to make the change and would therefore be in favor of it. Villanueva stated on her house they also have a front porch with internal gutters and they are having the exact same issue and can't find anyone to repair, remodel or rebuild the gutters. She is impressed with this approach and is in favor of this. She also noted that perhaps since there's such an issue with finding people to help with built in gutters are the guidelines out of date and there is a need for a much bigger discussion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: Minor Review - Staff Review: HPC25-0043: 406 South Summit Street - Summit Street Historic District (porch roof replacement) HPC25-0045: 1022 East College Street - East College Street Historic District (garage roof replacement) HPC25-0048: 332 East Davenport Street - Northside Historic District (roof shingle replacement): A roof shingle replacement for the main house. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION August 14, 2025 Page 4 of 5 HPC25-0047: 821 North Linn Street - Brown Street Historic District (roof shingle replacement with standing seam metal roofing) Intermediate Review — Chair and Staff Review: HPC25-0049: 810 North Johnson Street - Brown Street Historic District (radon mitigation system installation): Russett stated this is a corner lot and there's one piece of the piping that runs down the south side of the home, which technically fronts a street, but the house has two sides that front a street and the piping is just on the south side. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR JULY 10, 2025: MOTION: Wagner moves to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's July 10, 2025, meeting. Villanueva seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. COMMISSION INFORMATION: Open Meeting Training Requirements Russett stated the State recently passed a law that all new board and commission members need to go through an open meeting training that's provided by the State. The City would like all members of boards and commissions to take the training, however the rollout of the training has not gone well and given the fact that people can't get into trainings, and there's not enough trainings, she recommends Commissioners other than Curfman and Villanueva, who were both appointed in July, hold off on trying to get in until others have completed it. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Awards Lewis noted they switched to doing it in February and starting to plan it in August last year so it's time to begin thinking of scheduling the first subcommittee meeting soon. Friends of Historic Preservation will still be involved, but perhaps different people than last year since some of those people who were involved last year are maybe no longer part of Friends. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:00pm. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2024-2025 TERM 9/12 10/10 11/14 12/12 1/9 2/13 3/13 4/10 5/8 6/12 7/10 8/14 NAME EXP. BECK, 6/30/27 X O/E X X X X X X O/E X X X MARGARET BROWN, 6/30/26 X X X X X X X O/E O/E X X O/E CARL BURFORD, 6/30/27 X X X X X O/E X X X X X X KEVIN CURFAM, 6/30/2028 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- X O/E AUSTI N LEWIS, 6/30/26 X X X X O/E X X X X O/E X X ANDREW RUSSELL, 6/30/27 X O/E X O/E O/E X X X X X X X RYAN SELLERGREN, 6/30/25 X X X X X X X X X X --- --- JORDAN THOMANNN, 6/30/26 X X X X X X O/E X X X X X DEANNA VILLANUEVA, 6/30/25 X X X X O/E O/E X X X X X X NICOLE WAGNER, 6/30/26 O/E X X X X O/E X O/E X O/E O/E X FRANK WELU- 6/30/25 X O/E X X X X X O/E X X --- --- REYNOLDS, CHRISTINA KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E= Absent/Excused --- = Not a member Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Memorandum Date: September 11, 2025 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner Re: Section 106 review for replacement of US 6 Bridge (52-05122) over the Iowa River in Iowa City At your meeting on June 12, staff provided an update on the Section 106 process for the replacement of the US 6 Bridge over the Iowa River. The bridge was determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places during a statewide bridge survey conducted in 2011. In April 2025, it was determined that the bridge could not be repaired or remain in place with a new bridge constructed adjacent to it. The result of this evaluation is that the bridge must be demolished and replaced which is an adverse effect to the bridge. The next step will be the creation and adoption of a formal Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on how the Iowa Department of Transportation will mitigate the loss of the historic bridge to the community and other interested parties. The State Historic Preservation Office and your Commission will be involved throughout this process. Since the meeting in June, staff has continued to collaborate with the DOT and the SHPO on this effort. The discussions with these agencies have been about possible mitigation measures. Based on input from the Commission, staff provided the DOT with three possible mitigation options: 1. Intensive Survey of Oak Grove Park, 2. Reconnaissance Survey of the Kirkwood / Lucas Farms neighborhood, or 3. Summit Street Monument Project. After discussing these options with the DOT, they have proposed to move forward with the intensive survey of Oak Grove Park. They determined that of the three options this is the one that they could complete within their timeline. Based on the discussion with the DOT, they would propose this draft language for inclusion in the MOA: The Iowa DOT shall, in consultation with the Iowa City HPC and Iowa SHPO, complete an intensive survey of Oak Grove Park and immediately surrounding residences (approximately 12 properties) that are 45 years old or older. The Iowa DOT shall provide a draft of the survey to the Iowa Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 City HPC, and Iowa SHPO for review and comment, both entities shall provide comments within 60-days of delivery of the survey. All work completed for the intensive survey shall be consistent with Iowa SHPO's draft guidelines for architectural survey in Iowa. The DOT has asked staff to share this language with the Commission to provide you an opportunity to comment and ask questions.