HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-10-15 Info Packet~ - i
~~~.®d1~
~III~ ~
,~°~~~~
-.~..~_
CITY OF IOWA CITY
vrww.icgov.org
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
October 15, 2009
WORK SESSION OCTOBER 19
IP1 Council Meetings and Work Session Agenda
IP2 Memorandum from the Information Services Coordinator and the Recycling Coordinator:
ECO Iowa City update
IP3 Memorandum from the Interim City Manager: Legislative Priorities for 2010
IP4 Schedule of Pending Discussion Items
MISCELLANEOUS
IP5 Memorandum from the City Attorney: International Municipal Lawyers Association (IMLA)
Annual Conference
IP6 Email from Julie Natvig to the Interim City Manager: Extension of Kennedy Parkway [staff
response included]
IP7 Memorandum from the Director of Planning and Community Development: Update: Flood-
related activities
IP8 Memorandum from Acting Director Parks and Recreation: Farmers Market Customer &
Vendor Surveys
IP9 Johnson County Livable Community for Successful Aging Initiative [submitted by Dee
Vanderhoef]
DRAFT MINUTES
IP10 Economic Development Committee: September 15, 2009
IP11 Planning and Zoning Commission: September 17, 2009
IP12 Housing and Community Development Commission: September 24, 2009
IP13 Youth Advisory Commission: October 8, 2009
~ i
_~~®~~ 1 U-15-U9
~' III' ~
.,~_ ~ City Council Meeting Schedule and IP1
CITY OF IOWA CITY Work Session Agendas October 15, Zoos
www.icgov.org
• MONDAY, OCTOBER 19 Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:30p Regular Council Work Session
• Agenda Items
• ECO Iowa City Activities Update (ref IP2]
• 2010 Legislative Priorities (ref IP3]
• Information Packet Discussion (10/8 & 10/15]
^ Council Time
• Budget Priorities
^ Schedule of Pending Discussion Items (ref IP4]
• Upcoming Community Events/Council Invitations
^ Discussion of Meeting Schedules
• TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20 Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:OOp Regular Formal Council Meeting
TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE
SUBJECT TO CHANGE
• MONDAY, NOVEMBER 2 Emma J. Harvat Hall
TBA Regular Council Work Session
7:OOp Special Formal Council Meeting
• WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11 Emma J. Harvat Hall
Veterans Day -City Offices Closed
• THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 12 Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:30p Orientation/Joint Meeting -outgoing and incoming City Council
• MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16 Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:30p Regular Council Work Session
• TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17 Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:OOp Regular Formal Council Meeting
• MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30 Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:30p Regular Council Work Session
• TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1 Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:OOp Regular Formal Council Meeting
• MONDAY, DECEMBER 7 Emma J. Harvat Hall
5:OOp Meeting with Legislators
• MONDAY, DECEMBER 14 Emma J. Harvat Hall
TBA Regular Council Work Session
7:OOp Special Formal Council Meeting
~ - i
_ ~~
"'"'®'~~ City Council Meeting Schedule and
-~..~_
CITY OF IOWA CITY Work Session Agendas October 15, zoo9
www.icgov.org
• MONDAY, JANUARY 18 Emma J. Harvat Hall
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day -City Offices Closed
• WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 20 North Liberty
4:OOp Joint Meeting
_,! r ~ -
:.~;~~ CITY OF IOWA CITY 1P2
~ - •,,ql,®,~~~
-~.~.- RA N D U M
M EAU
CITY OF IOWA CITY
Date: October 8, 2009
To: City Council~~
From: Maeve Clark, Information Services Coordinator, Iowa City Public Library
Jen Jord ycling Coordinator, Public Works
Re: ECOlowa update
Early this spring, the Iowa City Public Library (ICPL) and Public Works Department received a
grant from the International City Managers Association and funded by the Gates Foundation.
"ECO Iowa City" was one of nine grants awarded out of 515 applications from across the
country; we received $57,000 to improve environmental sustainability in Iowa City. The grant
duration is 18 months and will conclude in the fall of 2010.
The four areas of ECO Iowa City are:
• urban composting & local food
• energy conservation
• urban stormwater management
• smart waste disposal
The premise of the grant is to give Iowa City residents the information and tools to be more
sustainable by providing a series of opportunities, including hands-on workshops, programs and
seminars as well as free items. A major goal of the grant is to partner with local organizations
who are already working in these areas to assist their programs and pool resources. To date,
we have held or participated in about 20 events, including:
• Participated in Project GREEN's Garden Fair; handed out 250 packets of vegetable
seeds (partner: Project Green, Seed Savers Exchange)
• Handed out Iowa City Community Compost coupons at Iowa City Farmers Market
• Held "Energy Efficiency in your Home" and "Making your Older Home More Energy
Efficient" programs at ICPL and gave away 100 winterization kits (partner: Mid
American Energy, Friends of Historic Preservation)
• Held composting program at ICPL and offered landfill/compost facility tour and sold 100
Earth Machine compost bins at a subsidized price ($25) at the East Side Recycling
Center (partner: Restore, Master Gardeners)
• Held vermicomposting workshop at ICPL and sold 25 vermicomposting kits at
subsidized price ($25) (partner: Backyard Abundance, Roxanne Mitten)
• Held pharmaceutical collection and disposal event; collected 135.8 pounds of expired
medications. (partners: Iowa State Patrol, Engineers for a Sustainable World, the
American Pharmacists Association -Academy of Student Pharmacists, the Nest of
Johnson County and the Iowa City Police Department)
A series of environmental films are planned for November and we will hold a "green New Years
resolution party" at the library on December 31. Spring programming is being planned now and
will focus heavily on urban stormwater. All events are listed at www.icpl.orq/eco-iowa-city.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Maeve Clark Jen Jordan
Information Services Coordinator Recycling Coordinator
Iowa City Public Library Public Wor#cs Division
319-887-6004 319-887-6160
mavclark(a~icpl.org Jennifer-iordan(c~iowa-city.org
-' r -~
~~.® ,~
~ni11r ~
,~~,.~
CITY OF IOWA CITY IP3
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 15, 2009
To: City Council
From: Dale Helling, Interim City Manager
Re: Legislative Priorities for 2010
Council is scheduled to meet with our area State legislators on December 7, 2009, to discuss
your priority issues for the 2010 Iowa legislative session. Historically you have identified your
highest priorities and adopted them by resolution prior to that meeting. Thus you would need to
adopt a resolution no later than December 1, 2009.
Time has been reserved on your October 19 work session to begin discussion of legislative
issues. This will allow you up to two additional work sessions (November 2 and 16) to finalize
your priorities and have a resolution on your December 1 formal meeting agenda. This will also
allow opportunity for input from newly elected Council members after the November 3 election.
Included with this memorandum are copies of:
2010 Legislative Priorities recently adopted by the Iowa League of Cities
September 4, 2009 memorandum from Mayor Bailey to Metropolitan Coalition staff outlining
legislative initiatives that Iowa City would be likely to support (Note: the Coalition has not yet
finalized its 2010 priorities)
Resolution 08-335 outlining Council's legislative priorities for the 2009 legislative session
2009 Legislative Priorities of the Metropolitan Coalition
There will likely be other issues Council members wish to offer for consideration. I would
suggest that your goal for this work session be to 1) identify all issues you wish to consider, and
2) present any questions or requests for additional information you may need to help you
determine the highest priority issues. Certainly you could begin to identify priorities as well if you
wish.
Please contact me if there is other information I can provide for your discussion.
-~ ; ~~eS
1 ~wdt ~ ems, w r v ~
2010 Legislative Priorities Approved by Policy Committee and League Board
City Revenue Options and Property Taxes
Priority: Diversify funding options for cities by authorizing alternative revenue options and
lessen city dependence on property taxes.
Economic Development Initiatives
Priority: Maintain and support funding for economic development programs and encourage
policies aimed at improving city economic development.
City Infrastructure
Priority: Increase funding for the TIME-21 fund to maintain Iowa's roads and bridges, and to
address city drinking water, wastewater and stormwater infrastructure funding needs.
Pensions
Priority: Iowa's cities want to ensure the integrity and long-term sustainability of the state's
public employee retirement systems.
Continued Disaster Rebuilding and Recovery
Priority: Support disaster recovery policies that help cities rebuild and mitigate future disasters.
Page 1 of 2
Dale Helling
From: R Bailey
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2009 3:03 PM
To: eat@mchsi.com
Cc: Dale Helling; Ross Wilburn
Subject: RE: Metro - 9/8 Conf. Call 10am Tuesday
Erika,
I plan to participate in the phone call Tuesday morning.
We have not discussed our legislative priorities as a council, but I anticipate that the following items are legislative
initiatives that Iowa City would be supportive of:
Alternative Revenues
Hotel/Motel Tax-what would work well for us would be an ability to increase the percentage to at least 9%.
Economic Development Initiatives
1. Increased state funding for micro-enterprise development
2. No changes or restrictions for the use of Tax Increment Financing
3. Another round of I-Jobs funding of at least the same amount as last session--$118.5 million
4. Continued funding for Vision Iowa, RECAT, grants from DCA and other state programs.
5. Increased state funding for trails (more comprehensive trail planning-update the IDOT trail plan?)
6. Funding support for Passenger Rail initiatives:
a. Commuter Rail
b. Extension of AMTRAK to Iowa City from the Quad Cities
Alcoholic Beverages
State statue to restrict price specials and related promotions that encourage excessive consumption.
State examination of the cash-only business of cover charges-there is local concern about under-reporting
revenue, as well as the concern that this is essentially a charge that supplements below-cost drink specials,
thereby encouraging excessive drinking.
?~enia
Regenia D. Bailey
430 Church Street
Iowa City, IA 52245
319.351.2068 (h)
319.321.1385 (mobile)
866.802.2854 (fax)
From: eat@mchsi.com [mailto:ea2@mchsi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 11:09 AM
To: jeff.pomeranz@wdm-ia.com; gaer.steve@rrrealty.com; scott.sanders@wdm-ia.com; pauleckert@sioux-
city.org; impactaccounting@cableone.net; regenia-bailey@iowa-city.org; ross-Wilburn@iowa-city.org; dale-
helling@iowa-city.org; tgoodman@cityofdubuque.org; teri53@aol.com; rdbuol@cityodubuque.org;
raclark@dmgov.org; fcownie@ecity.net; bebergman@dmgov.org; mayorgluba@ci.davenport.ia.us;
ctm@ci.davenport.ia.us; thanafan@councilbluffs-ia.gov; thanafan@cox.net; rbwade@justice.com;
kay.halloran@cedar-rapids.org; kay4iowa@mchsi.com; suev@cedar-rapids.org; bobanncamp@aol.com;
10/15/2009
Page 2 of 2
bkindred@city.ames. ia. us
Cc: eat@mchsi.com
Subject: Metro - 9/8 Conf. Call loam Tuesday
Note: This email has not been sent to members' administrative assistants, staff, or other non-voting
members. Please forward as necessary.
Good Morning: Ross has called a 5 minute conference call for this coming Tuesday, September 8th at
10:00 a.m. to discuss/vote on the two invoices the Coalition has received (per Bruce's message in
August). Call-in code and number to follow.
Response Needed by Wednesday, September 2nd (tomorrow)
Please respond to this message with the following information:
1) confirm your participation in the 9/8 call (minimum one voting member per member-city).
2) forward 5 potential legislative priorities for the Coalition to consider at the fall meeting, or if
available, a copy of your member-city's legislative priorities for 2010.
3) confirm participation in the fall meeting (minimum one voting member per member-city).
Reminder -Fall Meeting
Wednesday, September 23rd, 4:OOpm
Davenport, on site at the League of Cities Conference
Details to Follow
Thank you! ~ Erika
10/15/2009
12
Prepared by: Dale Helling, Asst. City Manager, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5013
RESOLUTION NO. 08-335
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY OF IOWA CITY
2009 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
WHEREAS, the Iowa City City Council supports property tax reform initiatives that eliminate
inequities in the current system, and also supports more diverse options for. generating operating
revenue; and
WHEREAS, the Iowa City City Council seeks to encourage legislation that enhances economic
development opportunity in Iowa City as well as the State of Iowa; and
WHEREAS, the City of Iowa City and other cities play a critical role in the future of the State.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Iowa City City Council hereby outlines its
legislative proposals to the Iowa City area legislative delegation for the 2009 Iowa State legislative
session as follows:
ALTERNATIVE REVENUE SOURCES
1. Support local revenue options that do not impact State revenues
2. Hotel/Motel Tax
a. Repeal exemption for government and non-profit agencies
b. Increase maximum tax by raising percentage or setting a flat amount per stay
3. Tax non-owner occupied condominiums as commercial properties
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES
1. Increased funding for micro-enterprise development
2. Expansion of Iowa Earned Income Tax Credit
3. More Effective Historic Preservation Tax Credit Program
4. Tax Increment Financing - No changes or further restrictions
5. Restore funding for Vision Iowa programs in FY10 and beyond
6. Funding support for Passenger Rail initiatives:
a. Commuter Rail
b. Extension of Amtrak to Iowa City of Iowa City
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
State statute to restrict price specials and related promotions that encourage excessive
consumption.
Passed and approved this 18th day of
ATTEST: - ~
CITY ERK
20 08
MAY
r ved by
/l-/2-DY
City Attorney's Office
Wpdata/mgr/asst/res/2DD91egis prior.doc
Resolution No. OS-335
Page 2
It was moved by Wright and seconded by o' Donnell the Resolution be
adopted, and upon roll call there were:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
x Bailey
x Champion
~_ Correia
x Hayek
_ g O'Donnell
x Wilburn
'- g ~ Wright
wpdata/glossary/resolution-ic. doc
The Metropolitan
2009 Legislative Priorities
I. Revenue Diversification
Promote diverse revenue alternatives for cities in order to reduce burden
on the property tax system.
II. Community & Economic Development
Support local community and economic development tools that require
low or no state investment but have a high impact on the state's and
local economies.
III. Infrastructure
Support efforts to increase state and local investment in Iowa's
overburdened infrastructure.
Coalition
Ames
Cedar Rapids
Council Bluffs
Davenport
Des Moines
Dubuque
Iowa city
Sioux City
West Des Moines
IV. Disaster Preparation & Response
Initiate and support efforts to continue the ability of local governments
to effectively prepare and respond to natural disasters.
IP4
SUMMARY OF PENDING WORK SESSION ISSUES
10/15/09
Gifts/Naming Policy (NOVEMBER 2)
Inclusionary Zoning and Scattered Site Housing (NOVEMBER)
Crime Related Issues Update (NOVEMBER)
Site Options for Proposed Justice Center (NOVEMBER/DECEMBER)
Meet with Historic Preservation Commission re: energy efficiency/green
issues (after guideline revisions are drafted) (DECEMBER)
Nuisance Enforcement
Site of New Animal Shelter (after FEMA final decision)
Taft Avenue -Land Use Designations for Adjacent Areas
Flood Response & Mitigation Update (PERIODIC)
Alley Inventory (SPRING `10)
Backyard Chickens (SPRING ' 10)
r
~~_,_.®~ CITY OF IOWR CITY IP5
,~®.~~ RA ~ D U ~
~E~a
Date: October 14, 2009
To: City Council
From: Eleanor M. Dilkes, City Attorney
Re: International Municipal Lawyers Association (IMLA) Annual Conference
The International Municipal Lawyers Association is holding its annual conference in Miami on
October 18 - 21. I typically attend this conference each year, as do a number of other City
Attorneys in Iowa. Earlier this year I eliminated the IMLA conference from my continuing legal
education budget due to budget constraints. However, I have received IMLA's regional
scholarship for the cost of the conference, and therefore, now have the budget to attend.
I will be out of the office the week of October 19, 2009 to attend the conference. First Assistant
City Attorney Sarah Holecek will be handling the City Council meetings in my absence. My staff
will know how to reach me.
cc: Dale Helling, Interim City Manager
Marian Karr, City Clerk
eleanor/mem/IMLA 10-09. doc
10-15-09
IP6
Marian Karr
From: Jeff Davidson
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 9:20 AM
To: 'julienatvig@mchsi.com'
Cc: *City Council; "City Manager's Office; Bob Miklo; Ron Knoche; John Yapp
Subject: FW: Extension of Kennedy Parkway
Hello Julie Natvig.
The City's Conditional Zoning Agreement with Southgate Development Company requires Kennedy Parkway to be open to
Camp Cardinal Boulevard no later than January 1, 2010. If this obligation is not met, no further building permits will be
issued for Cardinal Point Subdivision. The City Engineer has indicated that there is ongoing utility work which must be
completed before the City Council will accept the new portion of Kennedy Parkway, but that he expects the January 1
deadline to be met.
Thanks for your message.
Jeff Davidson, Director
Department of Planning and Community Development
The City of Iowa City, Iowa
From: Julie Natvig Lmailto:j_ulienatvigC~mchsi.coml
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 8:32 PM
To: Dale Helling
Subject: Extension of Kennedy Parkway
Two and a half years ago, my family and I moved into Cardinal Ridge Subdivision. Like all the Cardinal Ridge builders and
homeowners, we were promised by the developer, Southgate Development, that there would be two ways in and out of
our development. We have patiently waited for two official ways in and out of Cardinal Ridge for more than two years.
Going all the way through Walnut Ridge is time consuming and is hurting our vehicles due to the speed humps. There
was an "unofficial" back way out on Camp Cardinal Road into Coralville. As long as it wasn't muddy or icy, we put up with
that just fine. We didn't like it but we made the best of things and appreciated the ease of getting to and from Coralville.
We received notice this summer that FINALLY Kennedy Parkway would be extended to Camp Cardinal Boulevard and that
there would be a need to close the "unofficial" back way out of our neighborhood. We were informed that it would take two
months starting in mid-July. Again, we were fine with that. Unfortunately, it has now been THREE MONTHS -much of
that time no work was being done even though there were clearly lots and lots of dry days the workers could have worked.
Now the road is done, but we are not being allowed to use it. As far as I can tell, it needs some barricades to block off the
two areas where new roads will be going off it, but other than that - it is done. We need it open and feel that Southgate
has no interest in whatever is needed to finish is up and make good on a long overdue commitment.
It is getting ridiculous. Southgate has shown no interest in helping our neighborhood thrive. They wouldn't make the old
back way more user friendly (even though an ICCSD school bus used it the last two years), they haven't landscaped
common areas as they've promised, they don't take very good care of the lots they have available to sell. They allowed
someone outside the neighborhood to damage Cardinal Ridge property. They have kept promising and then postponing
putting in the road that is now done -but still not open.
As homeowners, we can't get the road opened up but we are hoping that the city might be able to "get the job done!" :-)
I can speak for so many of the Cardinal Ridge (and Walnut Ridge homeowners) that I've talked to about this, we'd be SO
VERY GRATEFUL if you could help us.
Thank you for your time!
Julie Natvig
iulienatvig(c~mchsi.com
r
~~.!_,,_.®~~ CITY 4 F ICJ W A CITY I P7
~~
~... ~~~~-~ ~ RAN D C~ ~
~~ ~
Date: October 15, 2009
To: City Council
From: Director of Planning and Community Development
Re: Update: Flood-related activities
Planning and Community Development
• Staff continues to review Jumpstart applications for disbursing State Jumpstart 2 and
State Jumpstart 3 funding. A total of 63 flood-impacted residential households have
been assisted with State Jumpstart funding and 18 households with Federal Jumpstart
funding.
• Doug Ongie attended the Case Management Subcommittee on October 9. The purpose
of the subcommittee is to discuss individual flood victim cases and identify programs and
agencies that could potentially assist a victim in need.
• Staff participated in a Disaster Recovery Teleconference held by the Iowa Department of
Economic Development on October 7. Topics included the Business Rental Assistance
Program, CDBG infrastructure and buyout programs, Jumpstart funding, and an update
from RIO.
• The City Manager, Public Works Director, and Planning staff met with a group of
residents from the Park View terrace neighborhood on October 14 to discuss flood
recovery and mitigation efforts for their neighborhood.
• Planning staff is still waiting on several duplication of benefits review from the state and
then can close on several properties. One more closing will occur this week.
• The Business Rental Assistance Program continues to receive applications. We have
-now had 50 applications for a total of $797,000. We have approved 40 of the
applications for a total of $679,000 of funding. Ten applications are still pending.
i
city of Iowa city
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
220 S. Gilbert Street
TO: Ciry Council
FROM: Michael Moran, Parks and Recreation Acting Director
DATE: October 15, 2009
RE: Farmers Market Customer & Vendor Surveys
Last night at its October meeting the Parks and Recreation Commission endorsed and unanimously
supported the process of evaluating the Farmers Market by means of the surveys that are attached to
this memo.
The process will be threefold; 1) Circulate attached flyer with the City water bills that will direct
people to an online web service or give them an option to receive a survey by mail. This process
will start October 28 and run through November 18. 2) Surveys will be available at public locations.
3) Vendors will receive a specialized survey mailed directly to them (also attached).
All responses will be due by December 18. Survey responses will be tabulated by staff. A report,
along with any recommendations, will be submitted to the Commission at their January 12 meeting.
This process and timeline should provide everyone with an opportunity to send us feedback, ideas,
suggestions, etc. for any changes that may occur with the market in the future. The vendor
registration packets will be distributed in late January; this process should allow ample time for
decision making and notification prior to the 2010 season.
I have attached the survey documents and the announcement that will appear in the City water bills.
I will be present at your Monday, October 19 work session to answer any questions that you may
have. If you have any questions prior to that please feel free to call me at 356-5100.
t
~'AnRN)tE1tSr
CIl\~~~rJ.r
Iowa City ~armer5 Market
Customer Survey
--- ---~.
The Iowa City Parks & Recreation Department is seeking your feedback concerning the Iowa City Farmers
Market. Please take a few moments to complete the following survey.
Did you attend the Iowa City Farmers Market this past season (May -October 2009)?
[ ] Yes.
If you checked "yes", how frequently did you attend?
[ ]weekly [ ]monthly [ ]occasionally
Those who checked "yes" can skip to item #2.
3.
[ ] No.
If "no", why did you not attend the market? Check all that apply.
[ ] days/times not convenient
[ ] location not convenient
[ ] not interested in products available
[ ] Other (explain)
Those who checked "no"have now completed the survey. Please skip items 2 and 3 and return
as instructed below. Thank you for completing the survey.
How would you rate the following in terms of need for improvement? Please put an "x" in the box
you select.
Factor Please check one:
~ ~ c.~idera~le
Irrp-t Irr~ro~errerl Irrpro-t Naedec
Suggestions/Comments
Hours of operation ^ ^ ^
Location ^ ^ ^
Parking ^ ^ ^
Cleanliness ^ ^ ^
Vendor courtesy ^ ^ ^
Product variety ^ ^ ^
Product quality ^ ^ ^
Prices ^ ^ ^
Number of vendors ^ ^ ^
Music/Special events ^ ^ ^
Other:
Do you have any other suggestions to improve the market?
[ ] No, I can't think of any suggestions to improve the market.
[ ]Yes (explain briefly)
Thank you for taking the time to complete the survey.
Please return to the following address no later than
Iowa City Parks & Recreation Department
Attn: Farmers Market Survey
220 S. Gilbert St. Iowa City, IA 52240 wlPARKSREC/CustomerSurvey-FarmersMarket-09
ti~~ A C'IT~f-
MAl\~~~rl
Iowa City 1=armer5 Market
1/endor Survey
,,_---
The Iowa City Parks & Recreation Department is seeking your feedback concerning the Iowa City Farmers
Market. Please take a few moments to complete the following survey. There is a limit of one completed survey
per vendor.
1. How would you rate the following in terms of need for improvement? Please put an "x" in the box
you select.
Factor Please check one:
~ ~ ~daa~e
Irrpro~rl In~rrErt Irrpn,~rrert N~dec
Suggestions/Comments
Location ^ ^ ^
Hours of operation ^ ^ ^
Season start/finish ^ ^ ^
Parking ^ ^ ^
Promotion/Marketing ^ ^ ^
Product variety ^ ^
Mix of vendors ^ ^ ^
Number of Vendors ^ ^ ^
Music/Special events ^ ^ ^
Other:
Do you have any other suggestions to improve the Farmers Market overall?
[ ] No.
[ ]Yes. Please describe:
Vendor Name (optional, but helpful for follow-up if provided):
Phone #
Thank you for taking the time to complete the survey.
Please return to the following address no later than
Iowa City Parks & Recreation Department
Attn: Farmers Market Survey
220 S. Gilbert St. Iowa City, IA 52240
w/ PA R K S R E C Ne n d o rS u rve y- F a r m e r s M a r k et
Tt~e 20119 Farmr rs M~3rktat seasar7 is over. but planning for next year's Farmers Market is in full swing -~- and we
need your help la rrrakc thc; 2C}10 Farmers 141arket even better! ., ~'' ~+~,~'';~
The Parks and Kc~creatran Cepartment, which manages the Farmers Market, is sponsoring ,~ customer ~.,.
>y y I y G ~ rJg p ~ to make them '
likevto hr_ qtr irornl! ~iio ~I~ what dorrorot~ urp trti attend the market t'o find o t what ittwould take We would also ~ Wit.
f t ~ ~ y
custarrrr.r;~ as weN' i.b€~ results will ire compiled and used in market planning and decision making. , f1 'x'~ ~ ~' "~ ~;
~'. ~ t
VVe encourage as many pec;ple as possible to take a f~~w minr.rtes is fill out the survey. For those with web ~ ~'~i~ `'. ~ ~ t:~ ~~`~~
access, go to www.icgav.orglmarketsurvey ~~~~,~,~--~ -
t=or those whey would prefer a papF~r copy. cah the Parks & Recreation office at 319-356-5100 ar~d a survey and pre-stamped
return envelope will he rnaileti to you. Copies are also available for pickup at.
City Hall Senior Center Public Library Rabt. A Lee Recreation Center
410 E.Washington St. 2$ S, Linn St. 123 S. Linn St. 220 S. Gilbert St.
C)eaciGne far return of surveys is ~ ,.._. ___.__. __._._._..._~ Questions can be directed io 319-356-521 1449
G'e'e G'~'!xl?~ yr~ur~ (~ Cl?l~l?!
The 2009 Farrr:c~rs tV1[rrke# season is over, but planning for next year's Farmers Market is in full Swing -and we
need your help to make the 20'10 Fanners Market even better! . ~ ~
n.,,, ,
Tfre.~ P arks anct Recreation Department, which manages the Farmers Market.. is sponsoring a customer '~~~
survey which w~li allow yor.r to provide your opinions and suggestions ko improve the market. We wotrid also ~ s
like to hear from peap(e who do 'lot currently attend the market, to find out what it would take to make them s a ~ ~ ,, ,
c~_~stamers as weii+ The results will be cart7piled and used in r7iarket planning and decision making. ~ t t'. t~ ~ , ~'r,,~9
'~
We encourage as rnar7y people as possible to take a few minutes ~ta fill out the survey. For thaw with web ~, ~t~ ~~. ~'~ ~~
access, 9o to www.icgov.org/markets~urvey. ~•~
Far those who wauid prefer a paper copy, call the Parks ,~ Recreation office at 319-356-510E1 and a survey anti pre-stamped
return envelope will b€~ mailed to you, Copies are also available for pickup at:
City Hall Senior Center Public Library Robt. A Lee Recreation Center
410 E.Washington St. 28 S. Linn St. 423 S. Linn St, 220 5. Gilbert St.
14014
Deadiinrr for rc~ir~rn of srrrveY ~` __....- _-.._ ~_ _.~. Questions can be direr..ted to ;319-356-521
G'Ve ~l~~~ Ut~Y t~ tYt t~J~?!~
._
Tfre `L009 Fanners A,1~a~ket season is aver, but plannrng tar next year's Farmers Market is in full swing --and we
nr~ed yor.Jr help to make the '?tl1(: Farmers Market even better? ` ' ~ ` ~ ~~~°
,,
Tile Perks c;r7c1 R~acreatian (aet~artment, which manages the Farmers Market, is sponsoring a customer `;~' ,_~'~.
survey whit.h will allow you to provide your opinions and suggestions to improve the market. We+wauid also - ,
like to hear fran people who do riot currently attend the market, to find out what it would take to make them
r..ustarT~ers as w~lL= 7h~? results will be compiled anc used in market planning and derision making. ~+;~ ~~,~'~ ~ ,~''
We r ncouragr as many peaplr as pcssibie to take a few minutes to fill out the survey, For those with web ~ (~ ~'~~~,~"
access. go fo wwuv.icgov.argfmarketsurvey ~_
For those who would prefer a paper copy, call the Parks F~ Recreation affiLe at 319-356-5100 and a survey and pre-stamped
return envr:,lope will be mailed to you. Copies are also available for pickup at'
City Nall Senior Center Public Library Robt. A Lee Recreation Center
410 E.Washington St. 28 S. Linn St. 123 S. Linn St. 220 S. Gilbert St.
Deadline for rraurn of surveys is _ .Questions can be directed to 319-356-521 1449
If you have questions, or would like additional
copies of this brochure, please contact:
JOHNSON COUNTY LIVABLE COMMUNITY
FOR SUCCESSFUL AGING INITATIVE
Johnso
Count
Information provided by:
Johnson County Livable Community
for Successful Aging Initiative
Aging Specialist
c/o Elder Services, Inc .
1556 S. First Avenue - Suite A
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Phone 319.338-0515
www.livablecommunity.ora or
iohnsoncountyCc~livablecommunity.orq
3rd edition -September 2009
Printed courtesy of Iowa Department of Transportation
and the Iowa Department on Aging
(last electronic up-dating -September - 2009)
- 12-
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
A Guide for Seniors: Transportation &
Mobility Options in Johnson County
Public
Transportation
Specialized
Transportation
Older Driver Resources
When Seniors should
Stop Driving
Information on available resources is
provided by Johnson County Livable
Community for
Successful Aging
www.li vablecommunity. orq
CAMBUS
Company Name: Cambus, The University of Iowa
Street: Stadium Drive, 100 Cambus Office
City, State, Zip Code: Iowa City, IA 52242
Phone: 319.335-8633
Contact Person: Brian McClatchey
E-Mail: brian-mcclatchey~a uiowa.edu
Fax: 319.335-6647 Website: www.uiowa.edu/~cambus
Eligibility All persons are eligible to use the fixed-route service
Costs: There is no fare.
Services Hours: 6:30am to Midnight, Monday-Friday
Weekend service varies during the academic year.
Services: Space at front of bus for seniors and disabled.
Vehicles are accessible.
Coralville Transit
Company Name: Coralville Transit
Street: 708 East 2nd Avenue
City, State, Zip Code: Coralville, IA 52241
Phone: 319.248-1790
Contact Person: Vicky Robrock
E-Mail: vrobrock@ci.coralville.ia.us -Fax: 319.248-17997
Website: www.coralville.org/mod.php?mod=department&did=29
Eligibility: All persons.
Costs: Elderly (65 and over) & Disabled Coralville residents
free any time with a Coralville Senior/Disabled pass.
Coralville will provide reduced fares ($.35) for those who
show a Medicare Card daily Monday through Friday 9:00
am to 3:00 pm and after 6:00 pm and all day Saturday.
Standard fare: $.75 adults and children (children under
5 free). 31 Day Pass costs $25. 20 ride pass costs $15.
Exact fare is required. Drivers do not make change.
Services Hours: 6 am to 11:45 pm Monday through Friday
and 7:15 am to 7:30 pm on Saturdays.
Services: Transfers are available and are honored by Iowa City.
i
New from the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT)
~ www.iowasafeandmobileseniors.com ~
~ This is a newly developed excellent source of information for the ~
~ mature driver, family members and care-givers, Health Care ~
professionals, Community Planners and Law Enforcement
~ personnel. Check the web site for much valuable information. ~
Driver Retirement Planning: A Good Iowa Investment
As part of its "Choices Not Chances -The Road to Driving
Safer and Longer" initiative, the Iowa Department of
Transportation developed "Driving Retirement: Planning and
Making It Work". This brochure is targeted to the older adult and
provides worksheets to assist individuals in identifying their
transportation options and developing a personal transportation
plan. This brochure developed for Iowa residents is available
through the state DOT offices or at:
..from the University of Iowa Center on Aaina: Older
Adult Driving Resources According to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, older adults are nine times more likely to be involved in
fatal accidents than drivers aged 25 to 69. In 2000, older adults made
up 9% of the resident population, but accounted for 13% of all traffic
fatalities and 17% of all pedestrian fatalities.
The Center on Aging, in order to assist Iowans in finding
information for older adults and their family and friends about driving
independently, has created a resource page on their website about
programs to evaluate driving performance.
This list of resources contains programs that can evaluate an
individual's ability to continue to drive independently, whether they can
become an independent driver, or if an individual needs adaptive
equipment. To find out more information, please visit the Center on
Aging website at www.centeronaging.uiowa.edu or contact the Center
at 319-335-6576
-2- ~ -11-
CarFit: Program Volunteers teach making adjustments to
I your vehicle to make it "fit" you better. These will make you feel I
~ more comfortable and in control of your vehicle. Classes are held ~
I on a periodic basis and are free of charge. For further information I
contact - Susan Rogusky -IC/JC Senior Center at 356-5224.
I I
L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J
Additional information:
• FREE LITERATURE TO SEND FOR: + AAA Foundation
for Traffic Safety: Visit www.aaafoundation.org and click on
"Products" then "Free Materials" for a variety of free
publications including:
• Over the Edge and Back; Peligro en el Camino;
• How to Handle Glare for Safer Driving at Night;
• How to Help an Older Driver;
• The Older and Wiser Driver;
• Road Rage: How to Avoid Aggressive Driving;
• Drivers 55 Plus: Test Your Own Performance.
www.aaafoundation.org~roducts/index.cfm?button=free
Visit also:
• The National Center on Senior Transportation (NCST) web
site at www.seniortransportation.net
• www.SeniorDrivers.ora a Website devoted specifically to
senior citizens and driving safety. (AAA)
• Getting Around -good information for seniors and their
families grappling with driving cessation.
http://www.getting-around.org/home/ (AAA)
• + American Occupational Therapy Association: Provides a
nationwide list of driver rehabilitation specialists who give
thorough driver evaluations. Visit www.aota.org/olderdriver
or call 888.232-1184.
• + The Hartford Financial Services Group: Offers a free
brochure "Family Conversations with Older Drivers". Visit
www.thehartford.com/talkwitholderdrivers.
-10-
Iowa City Transit
Company Name : Iowa City Transit
Street/City: 1200 S. Riverside Drive -Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Phone : 319.356-5151
Contact Person: Chris O'Brien E-Mail: Chris-obrien(a~iowa-city.orq
Fax: 319.356-5155 Website: www.icgov.org/transit
Eligibility: All persons
Costs: Elderly (60+ years) 35 cents during off-peak hours
(Medicare card or special pass required; call office for details and
application). Disabled/low income elderly -free during off-peak
hours (call office for details and application).
Standard fare: Adults (18 and up) $.75 -Youth (K-12
grade) $.50. Children under 5 and accompanied by an adult
rides free. 10 ride pass costs $6.50. 31 day pass (adult) $25.00,
(youth) $20.00. Exact fare is required.
Services Hours: Every half hour 6:00 am to 9:00 am and 3:00
pm to 6:30 pm during "rush" hours. Hourly service runs 9:00
am to 3:00 pm and 6:30 pm to 10:30 pm and all Day Saturday
from 6 am to 7 pm. There is no Sunday service.
Services: Transfers are available & are honored by Coralville.
Newest buses ordered are low-floor buses that are easy to enter
and exit. During non-rush hours the bus will stop at any
intersection, other wise they will only stop at designated bus
stops.
NORTH LIBERTY
Company Name: City of North Liberty
Street: 5 E. Cherry Street/ P.O. Box 77
City, State, Zip Code: North Liberty, IA 52317
Phone: 319.626-5700
Contact Person: Tracey Mulcahey
E-Mail: tmulcahey~a ci.north-liberty.ia.us
Fax: 319.626-3288
Website: www.northlibertyiowa.org/transit
Eligibility All persons Costs: $.75 per one way ride
Services Hours: Leaves Community Center, 520 W. Cherry St.
7:05 am -arrive downtown Iowa City at 7:50 am. Returns
leaving I.C. Pentacrest at 5:10 pm and arrives N. Liberty
Community Center at 5:45 pm.. Free parking at Community
Center. Transfers available.
-3-
SEATS
Company Name: SEATS Para-transit
Street: 4810 Melrose Avenue
City, State, Zip Code: Iowa City, Iowa 52246
Phone: 319. 339-6128
Services: SEATS provides door to door service, plus
assistance with limited packages. Phone Numbers
339-6125: to schedule a ride for the next day or up to seven days
339-6127: to cancel a ride or for the current day issues
339-6128: after hours/office closed (to leave a message, talk to a
night driver) or for comments, questions, to talk to a supervisor.
Helpline: For a same day after-office-hours cancellation, call
319.339-6128. At the end of the greeting message, you
will be connected to the evening driver. You may talk to
the driver or leave a phone number for the driver to call
you back. The latest a driver will be available varies on
their last scheduled drop-off.
If you are calling after hours for a next day or future day
cancellation, please call 319.339-6127 and leave a message on
the voice mail. Please leave your name, name of the rider,
telephone number, date and time of trip(s), and the pick up and
drop off address of all trips you wish to cancel.
The drivers do not have access to make scheduling
changes, so do not ask them to make any changes for you. .
Mid-Day Appointments are encouraged.
Contact Person: Tom Brase
E-Mail: tbrase(a~co.johnson.ia.us Fax 319.339-6185
Website: www.johnson-county.com/seats/index.shtml
Eligibility: In Iowa City, Coralville, North Liberty and University
Heights eligibility is determined by each community's transit
system based on the Americans with Disabilities Act's guidelines
and categories.
For people who live in a community without a transit
system or live in the unincorporated areas of Johnson County,
they may call SEATS to arrange a ride. Small communities and
the surrounding areas are served either 2 or 3 days per week.
-4-
Step 3 -Suggest various options, depending on the degree of
impairment. One size does not fit all and while stopping driving
may be the only answer in some cases, stopping driving too early
can cause a person's overall health to decline prematurely. You
may want to:
• Take a classroom refresher course such as the AARP
Driver Safety Program
• Seek additional information from other Web sites on topics
such as behind-the-wheel assessment, counseling from
private or public sources, remedial training, and/or
adaptive equipment from an occupational therapist. (See
our Web Resources listing.)
• Limit driving to certain times of day or familiar areas.
• Encourage the driver to consider and gradually begin using
other methods of transportation such as rides from family
and friends, public transportation, pars-transit services,
taxis or other public or private transportation options in
your community. Accompany the person during initial trials
of alternate forms of transportation.
• Contact local motor vehicle office. Your state Department
of Motor Vehicles may have programs to evaluate
individual driving abilities or may offer special licensing
alternatives. Remember, their goal is not to take licenses
away, but to help people keep driving as long as they
safely can. Contact the state for more information.
Step 4 -Seek additional help if necessary. If the person is not
taking proper action in response to your concern and the
impairment is increasingly obvious, it may be necessary to
involve the driver's doctor. (In addition to family members, a
family doctor is often the most trusted person for providing advice
on health issues that may affect driving.) You may also consider
resources on Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, and driving. (web
site: http://www.thehartford.com/alzheimers/ )
-9-
14. Other drivers honking at you and instances when you are
angry at other drivers.
15. Friends or relatives not wanting to ride with you
If you notice one or more of these warning signs you may want to have
your driving assessed by a professional or attend a driver refresher class
(see resources on page 6). You may also want to consult with your
doctor if you are having unusual concentration or memory problems, or
other physical symptoms that may be affecting your ability to drive.
I "When To Stop Driving" - (or "We Need To Talk") -Here in I
~ Johnson County, trained public speakers on this topic are ~
I available to come speak to your group. Call Aging Specialist at I
Livable Community Office for information. (319)338-0515.
I I
L--------------------------------J
How Can I Help Someone Else Limit or Stop Driving?
Most drivers monitor themselves and gradually limit or stop
driving when they feel that a certain driving situation or driving in
general is not safe. However, some people fail to recognize
declining abilities, or they fear stopping to drive because it will
make them permanently dependent on others for the necessities
of life, and it may reduce their social and leisure activities as well.
Conditions such as dementia or early stages of Alzheimers'
disease may make some drivers unable to evaluate their driving
properly.
Step 1 -Assess the situation. See the 15 warning signs listed
above. It will help to personally ride with the person and observe
driving habits first hand.
Step 2 - Begin a process of having conversations about driving
with the driver. As people age they tend to look first to family
members (spouse and children) for candid advice concerning
their well-being and health issues. Have conversations early and
often. Start the conversation out of a sincere sense of caring for
the person's well-being and base it on things you have observed.
(SEATS - con't)
Costs: $2.00 one-way for rural residents; $1.50 one-way ride or
reduced fare is available for Iowa City residents for trips
originating in Iowa City. Riders must have correct fare or
Punch cards can be purchased for 10 one-way rides. A
personal care attendant may ride free and a companion
can ride for the same fare.
Services Hours: In Iowa City, Coralville, and University Heights
service is provided seven (7) days a week weather permitting:
Monday -Friday: 6:00 am to 11:30 pm. (6:00 am to 11:30 pm
for Coralville) Saturday: 6:00 am to 7:30 pm.
Sunday: 8:00 am to 2:00 pm. Holidays:
Closed for Holidays: The operating times will vary for the
following so please call SEATS 339-6128 for specific information:
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Presidents Day, day after
Thanksgiving, and the floating Christmas Holiday.
The operating times for Cosgrove, Frytown, Hills, Lone Tree,
Morse, North Liberty, Oasis, Oxford, Sharon Center, Shueyville,
Solon, Swisher, Tiffin and the surrounding areas will vary, so
please call SEATS at 319.339-6218 for specific information.
SOLON SENIOR ADVOCATES
Company Name: SOLON SENIOR ADVOCATES
Street: Box 206 - 1425 Hwy 1
City, State, Zip Code: Solon, Iowa 52333
Phone: 319.624-2710
Contact Person: Sandy Hanson
Eligibility: Solon seniors and those in need in Solon
Costs: $.75 per "drop" or trip. (example: trip to senior dining
and home would be $1.50 - as two "drops")
Services Hours: When a driver is available
Services: Senior Dining, Appointments, Sponsored Pleasure
Trips -licensed for 15 passenger van.
-5-
-8-
Commercial Transportation
Numerous taxi companies are listed in the
yellow pages of the local phone book.
Educations/Resources: Free or /ow cost
AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM
AARP Driver Safety Courses are offered on a frequent basis in
area locations. The AARP Driver Safety Program is an 8-hour
classroom refresher that can help you learn the effects of aging
on driving and how you can adjust your driving. Most classes are
taught in two, four-hour sessions spanning two days, and the
course costs $10.
For a listing of future courses in this area, go to:
www.aarp.org/families/driver safety/wrapper driver.~y
Fill in your zip code to get the site locations and contact phone
numbers. You'll get a listing of courses occurring in the next six
weeks, within 20 miles of your zip code.
You can also call 1-888-AARP-NOW (1-888-227-7669 to find
a course by phone. It's atoll-free call. Please be ready to give us
your 5-digit zip code. A local volunteer will call you back within 3-
5 business days to help you locate the course nearest you.
Alternatively -take the Driver Safety Course Online: Go to:
www.aarp.org/families/driver safety/driver safety online course.html
The AARP Driver Safety Program is the nation's first and
largest refresher course for drivers age 50 and older that has
helped millions of drivers remain safe on today's roads. The
course is designed to help you:
Tune up your driving skills and update your knowledge of
the rules of the road.
Learn about normal age-related physical changes, and
how to adjust your driving to allow for these changes.
Reduce your traffic violations, crashes, and chances for
injuries.
-6-
• Qualify for an auto insurance premium reduction or
discount. Specific state insurance laws vary -please
consult your insurance agent for specifics in your state.
The online course is self-paced and interactive and can be taken
at the time and place of your choice. Online course fee is $15.95
for AARP members and $19.95 for non-members. Upon
completion, a certificate will be mailed directly to your home.
"WHEN TO STOP DRIVING" .While we all want to continue
driving as long as we can do so safely, the time may come when
we must limit or stop driving.. Check out the following warning
signs.
Warning Signs: What are the warning signs when someone
should begin to limit driving or stop altogether?
1. Difficulty seeing the sides of the road when looking straight
ahead
2. Easily distracted or having a hard time concentrating while
driving
3. Having a hard time turning around to check over your shoulder
while backing up or changing lanes
4. Frequent traffic tickets or "warnings" by traffic or law
enforcement officers in the last year or two
5. Feeling uncomfortable and nervous or fearful while driving
6. Dents and scrapes on the car or on fences, mailboxes, garage
doors, curbs etc.
7. Difficulty staying in the lane of travel
8. Getting lost
9. Trouble paying attention to signals, road signs and pavement
markings
10. Slower response to unexpected situations
11. Medical conditions or medications that may be affecting the
ability to handle the car safely.
12. Frequent "close calls" (i.e. almost crashing)
13. Trouble judging gaps in traffics at intersections and on
highway entrance/exit ramps
(con't -next page)
7-
IP10
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
CITY COUNCIL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
SEPTEMBER 15, 2009
LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM, 8:00 A.M.
Members Present: Regenia Bailey, Connie Champion, Matt Hayek
Staff Present: Wendy Ford, Tracy Hightshoe, Jeff Davidson
Others Present: Ann Ashby, Lorenz 2.0 Owner; Joe Raso, ICAD
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
CALL MEETING TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Bailey at 8:00 A.M.
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 30. 2009 ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING:
Champion moved to accept the July 30, 2009 meeting minutes as submitted.
Hayek seconded the motion.
Carried 3-0.
DISCUSSION OF A CDBG ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND APPLICATION FOR
LORENZ 2.0:
Hayek recused himself from this discussion and left the meeting room due to a conflict of
interest. Hightshoe explained the Lorenz 2.0 business proposal to Members. Lorenz
2.0 is proposed to be a fashionable shoe store, geared toward the college-age and
younger adult market. Hightshoe noted that the owner has previous business
experience in this area. Staffs recommendation is to loan up to $15,000 for working
capital with a maximum term of 7 years at 1% interest. Champion stated that this could
possibly be a successful business. However, she questioned the lack of the owners'
investment of any cash of her own in the venture. She stated that she believes the
owner should have some money of her own in the business, that she should carry the
risk in this venture -not the City. Champion added that she does agree with staffs
recommendation at this point. Bailey said that she agrees with Champion's statements.
Ann Ashby, the owner, noted that she probably could secure more funding. She stated
that she believes this venture will be successful, and that the family name will have an
impact as they have been in the community since 1919. Bailey noted that she believes
this will be a good addition to the downtown, but she agreed with Champion's statement.
Hightshoe noted that if the owner can secure additional funding on her own, she would
need to submit an updated business plan with projections, in order to reconsider this
application.
The discussion continued with Members noting that securing more funding would be
their suggestion at this time. The owner asked what she needs to do in order to get
things rolling so she can open for business in October. It was noted that once
something is secured and the revised application is received, the Economic
Development Committee will call a special meeting to deal with this issue. Ford
Economic Development Committee Meeting
September 15, 2009
discussed the timeline needed to get this through the City Council in order for Ashby to
have an answer as soon as possible.
DISCUSSION OF FUNDING REQUEST FROM ENTREPRENEURIAL DEVELOPMENT
CENTER, INC. (EDC):
Ford noted that Members have a letter in their packet from the Entrepreneurial
Development Center (EDC) in Cedar Rapids. She noted that about a year and a half
ago they approached the City Manager's office with a request for $15,000 in funding. At
that time, the Economic Development Committee decided to forego any decisions until
they knew more about the organization. Ford added that they had not heard anything
further from this organization until recently, when Chuck Stein wrote a letter of request
for $20,000 in funding support, as part of their Vitality 2014 fundraising campaign. Upon
researching other area contributors to EDC, Ford noted that ICAD recently committed to
$7,500 with the stipulation that EDC meet certain performance measures. She also
noted that the Iowa City Area Chamber has opted not to fund EDC and that the City of
Cedar Rapids recently started funding EDC with a commitment of $100,000 per year for
five years. Ford stated that staff recommends they again table this consideration for
now in order to see how EDC performs under ICAD's metrics in the coming year.
Bailey and Champion both stated that they agree with staffs recommendation. Bailey
asked Hayek what his thoughts are. Hayek stated that he agrees with the
recommendation by staff. He noted that ICAD's involvement with EDC will give them a
better picture of this organization.
CITY COUNCIL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE STRATEGIES AND
POLICIES:
A. REVIEW OF 2007-2008 FINAL REPORT -Ford noted that Members have a
copy of this final report in their packet. She added that it serves as a good
review and a benchmarking tool for review of the objectives in preparation for an
updated 2009-2010 document.
B. CONSIDER UPDATES FOR 2009-2010 -Ford noted that Members have a copy
of this in their packets, as well. She stated that she believes they should review
the policies and mainly focus on the objectives, to see if those still stand as the
objectives for this Committee. Bailey asked Members to give their thoughts.
Hayek noted that the six policies are broad and all-encompassing, as well as
thoughtful. He asked if staff could come up with anything that they feel should be
on this list. Davidson noted that they come at it from a different perspective than
the Committee. He noted that the main purpose of reviewing this is to make sure
they don't need to make adjustments to the policies and objectives, given the
economic landscape of the past few years. Bailey noted that she is comfortable
with the broad direction they are following. Hayek and Champion both agreed
with this, as well. Davidson noted that if Members feel there is anything lacking
in these policies and objectives to let staff know. The discussion continued, with
Members discussing their thoughts on the direction that staff takes. Ford and
Hightshoe then spoke about a grant the City has applied for through the Small
Business Administration that they could focus on the City's southeast side, to
help entrepreneurial ventures get started with various training.
The discussion turned to perceptions by others in the area regarding the
problems in the southeast side. Joe noted that some employers have told him
Economic Development Committee Meeting
September 15, 2009
that they have employees who walk to work, and they are now questioning their
safety, due to these problems. He noted that employers who are attempting to
recruit employees have stated that recruits are even questioning safety in this
area. Ford added that a commercial landlord in the southeast side has stated
they are having trouble getting tenants to renew their leases due to the crime in
the parking lot. Members noted that the community has the expectation that this
type of thing, the crime, will not happen here.
Members continued to discuss the policies and objectives they have been
following. Ford suggested a change to the fourth objective, noting that having
something more specific here would be helpful for staff. Suggestions were
discussed at some length by Members. Ford stated that they can further review
this at their next meeting.
COMMITTEE TIME:
None.
STAFF TIME:
Hightshoe spoke about some of the other requests they have received, and the fact that
they have been so busy with flood-related matters.
Ford stated that she had a few updates for Members. Regarding the Downtown
Incubator project, this was funded by the EDA for a feasibility study, and they should be
receiving proposals this week. Currently they are in the middle of distributing Business
Rental Assistance Program checks for the businesses that pay rent in formerly flood
damaged commercial property. Ford noted that they are working with a consultant to
recommend improvements to the North Side Market Place area, between Market Street
and the alley, or up to Bloomington Street. Ford also spoke about the ICAD shovel-
ready initiative, adding that it is well underway now. Also, according to Ford, the
Towncrest redevelopment idea has been coming together with various options being
created conceptually. She stated that there will be another public meeting soon to
reveal these ideas and get feedback.
ADJOURNMENT:
Champion moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:08 A.M.
Hayek seconded the motion.
Carried 3-0.
Economic Development Committee Meeting
September 15, 2009
Council Economic Development Committee
ATTENDANCE RECORD
2009
TERM ~ v, rn ~ ~ ~
NAME
EXP• N
o N
~ ~
cn N
~ W
o ~
cn
Regenia 01/02/10 X X X 0/E X X
Baile
Matt 01/02/10 X X X X X X
Ha ek
Connie 01/02/10 X X X X X X
Cham ion
Key:
X =Present
O =Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
~ u-~ 5-uy
IP11
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 - 7:00 PM -FORMAL
CITY HALL, EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ann Freerks, Tim Weitzel, Josh Busard, Charlie Eastham,
Michelle Payne
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Elizabeth Koppes, Wally Plahutnik
Bob Miklo, Sarah Walz, Sarah Holocek
John Moreland
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
None.
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairperson Ann Freerks.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None.
REZONING ITEM:
REZ09-00003: Discussion of an application submitted by Southgate Development
Company for a rezoning from Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS-8) zone to
High Density Single Family Residential (RS-12) zone for approximately 4.29 acres of
property located on Walden Road, west of Mormon Trek Boulevard. The applicant has
requested that this item be deferred indefinitely.
Eastham stated that he would be abstaining from discussions on this matter due to a potential
conflict of interest.
Miklo said that a motion to defer the item indefinitely would be in order. Freerks asked if there
was any additional information on the application. Miklo said his understanding is that there is
still some negotiation going on between the property owner and the homeowners' association to
the south regarding drainage issues.
Freerks opened the public hearing.
Planning and Zoning Commission
September 17, 2009 -Formal
Page 2 of 6
Holecek noted that any comments in the public hearing should speak to the deferral rather than
the details of the case.
No one wished to speak on the issue and the public hearing was closed.
Weitzel moved to defer REZ09-00003 indefinitely.
Payne seconded.
The motion carried 4-0 (Eastham abstaining; Koppes and Plahutnik absent).
REZ09-00007: Discussion of an application submitted by Arlington Development, Inc., for
a rezoning from Interim Development Single-Family Residential (ID-RS) zone to Medium
Density Single-Family Residential (RS-8) zone for approximately 7.91 acres of property
located on Huntington Drive, west of Taft Avenue. The 45-day limitation period is
October 9, 2009.
Walz outlined the location of the property. Eastham asked Walz what the future plan is for
Colchester Drive, a road to the west of the property. Walz explained that Colchester would
intersect Thames. The current zoning is Interim Development Single Family Residential (ID-RS)
and the proposed zoning is Medium Density Single Family (RS-8), Walz said. She corrected
the staff report by saying that the RS-8 zone allows for small-lot single-family, but that two
corner lots in the development are also large enough to be eligible for duplexes. Walz said that
the Northeast District plan shows the area north of Thames as appropriate for large-lot single
family housing. That plan considered large lots with access along a rear alley that would have
been along the creek. The intention of that plan was to minimize the impact of Taft Avenue on
future residential development. Walz said that at some point Taft Avenue will be improved and
will serve as an arterial street and that given the industrial property to the south it will carry
significant truck traffic. Walz said that Staff has been concerned with providing a landscape
buffer there for these properties.
Walz said the Northeast District Plan depicted the area south of Thames Drive as small lots
served off an alley that runs between lots. Walz said this plan was created prior to the
development of Windsor Heights Part 21 to the south. The Northeast District Plan had
conceived of a public street running along the creek rather than between developed lots. Walz
said that Staff does think it is important to have single-loaded streets at least along that portion
of the creek to open access to the park. Staff has asked the applicant to consider curving the
road to make a better transition to the single family home nearby and to provide asingle-loaded
street toward the park that will eventually be located in Stonebridge Estates. Staff has also
asked the applicant to present a very thorough landscaping plan for the buffer area. Because
the buffer cannot be installed until improvements are made to Taft Avenue, Staff will be asking
the applicant to set escrow money for those improvements.
Staff recommends that REZ09-00007, a rezoning for 7.91 acres from Interim Development
Single family (ID-RS) zone to Medium Density Single Family (RS-8) zone for the property at
Huntington Drive be deferred until the street layout is addressed and a detailed landscaping
plan is provided for review by the Commission. Walz said that if these two issues are resolved,
Staff recommends approval for this rezoning subject to a conditional zoning agreement
requiring:
Planning and Zoning Commission
September 17, 2009 -Formal
Page 3 of 6
1. the developer to dedicate space along Taft Avenue for right-of-way and construction
easements to allow the improvement of Taft Avenue;
2. general conformance with the concept plan with regard to lot depths and street layout;
and
3. substantial compliance with a landscaping plan for the buffer area.
Freerks asked if there were questions for Staff.
Busard asked if Huntington Drive would cross back over the creek or run along the length of the
creek. Walz said it would stay on the east side of the creek. Payne asked if it would eventually
get all the way up to lower West Branch Road on that side of the creek and Walz said that it
would. Miklo said it would either do that or curve back in to the east. Payne observed that the
road curvature is basically to get around the already existing lot. Miklo said that the anticipation
is that if that large lot is annexed in the future it could be subdivided as well. Miklo said that
continuing the street straight north would run it awfully close to that existing house. Eastham
asked if there was enough room between the existing house and the creek bed for a street.
Miklo said Staff would anticipate that it would be annexed before it is developed because the
property goes basically to the creek. Miklo said the extension of that street would depend on
the property owner participating in some kind of development. Eastham asked if Staff had
looked to see if Huntington can be rerouted to the east and still allow for the same number of
single-family lots as proposed by the developer. Freerks said there is no guarantee that
someone can put in as many lots as they want. Eastham said he was aware of that but that he
was trying to get an idea of how the proposed street alignment could change the developer's
plan. Miklo said there was potential for the plan to be diminished by one or two lots if the street
was realigned.
There were no further questions and the public hearing was opened.
John Moreland, 960 Arlington Drive, introduced himself as one of the developers of Arlington.
He said that he and his partners have developed nearly all of the land to the north and south of
the proposed development. He said that due to the nature of Taft Avenue as an arterial street
there is no demand for large single family lots along the road. He said he is attempting to come
up with something more affordable for families. He said that they have been working with staff
and had gone from an original plan for multi-family units to small-lot single-family units.
Moreland said he has no problem with putting a buffer along Taft Avenue. He said that they
would also be willing to try to curve the street as close to the creek as possible without taking
out a bunch of lots. Moreland said having to reduce the number of lots would severely hamper
their efforts to keep the housing affordable in this development. Moreland said that it is crazy to
change the plan so much because of one man's home. He said that they think they can
reconfigure the road and get as much buffer as possible on the Taft side. What the applicant
does not want to do is to be required to have asingle-loaded street because that will take the
affordability right out of the project. Moreland said the applicant would resubmit and do their
best to cut the size of the lots on the west side of the creek so that there could be a deeper
buffer from Taft, but that they still have to be able to put a house on it. Moreland said that due
to the amount of traffic on Taft, the best use of the land will be for first-time homebuyers who
just want to get into asingle-family home at a good price.
Freerks asked Moreland if he had talked to the neighbor to the north. Moreland said someday
the man will probably sell it and that his guess is that anyone who buys it will continue on with
the kind of development Moreland is proposing. Moreland said along busy roads like Taft and
Scott Boulevard lower priced housing is the way to go. Freerks asked if Moreland had talked to
Planning and Zoning Commission
September 17, 2009 -Formal
Page 4 of 6
the property owner about the proposal. Moreland said they had not talked to him about buying
his property. Freerks asked if he had talked to him about the way the road is proposed to be
developed. Moreland said he had not because he knows the man personally and he believes
he is probably very pleased that they are trying for single-family development rather than a
zoning like RM-12, multi-family.
There were no further comments on this issue and the public hearing was closed.
Payne made a motion to defer REZ09-00007, an application by Arlington Development for
the rezoning on Huntington Drive west of Taft Avenue.
Eastham seconded.
Freerks said she thought it might be advisable for the developer to discuss the proposal with the
owner of the existing home, and said that it might be nice for the Commission to actually hear
from that property owner.
Busard said he is concerned that the Commission is trying to determine the fate of Huntington
Drive without really knowing what is going to happen to the north. Busard said further
consideration has to be given as to how the existing lot will fit in with the proposal.
Eastham said that his view is that the Comprehensive Plan does support smaller lot
development in this area, especially along an arterial street. Eastham said that a landscape
buffer between Taft and the homes to be built is certainly desirable. He said that getting a
residential street in such a narrow corridor as proposed by Staff between the existing home and
the creek is not an easy thing to do. Eastham said that he did not quite understand the concern
about not knowing the future plans for the property to the north.
Busard clarified that his question was what will happen to the road after it curves along the
street, what the plan for that road would be.
Miklo said that the goal is not to have Huntington follow the creek for the entire subdivision,
rather to start curving it at some point so that when it does come near the neighbor's property it
can curve as far from the property as possible.
Eastham asked if the goal with Huntington's alignment was to not get close to the existing
house or to provide good alignment for future subdivisions. Miklo and Freerks replied that it was
to do both. Miklo added that it was also intended to provide good access to parklands, as Walz
had indicated earlier. Freerks said she is sure there are multiple solutions to this problem.
Miklo said a cul-de-sac configuration had been considered.
A vote was taken and the motion to defer carried on a 5-0 vote (Koppes and Plahutnik
absent).
CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: SEPTEMBER 3, 2009:
Eastham motioned to approve the minutes.
Weitzel seconded.
The minutes were approved 5-0 (Koppes and Plahutnik absent).
Planning and Zoning Commission
September 17, 2009 -Formal
Page 5 of 6
OTHER:
Freerks noted that the 7:00 p.m. start time seemed to be working well for Commissioners and
Staff.
ADJOURNMENT:
Payne motioned to adjourn.
Eastham seconded.
The meeting was adjourned on a 5-0 (Koppes and Plahutnik absent) vote at 7:40 p.m.
Z
O
~°~
00
V W
ZVo
N Z N
a
00
Q W
C7 ~
zQ
z
z
Q
J
a
1~
~
X
X
X W
O
X W
O
X
M
o~
X
X
X
X W
O
X
X
O
M
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
co
M
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ti
~ x o x x x x x
~ o x x x x o x
M X X X X X X X
~ x x x x x o x
v
~ x x x x x x x
M X X X X X X X
N x x x x o x x
~ X X X ~ X X X
r
N
W
~
~
.-
M
N
O
O
M
W X ~
~ ~
~n ~
~n ~
~n ~
~n ~
~ ~
~n
H W o 0 0 0 0 0 0
W_ ~ }
Q J w J
~ J
a
= = Z ~ ~
v
i
V
Q i ~
~ W U Y ~
~ Q Y fn ~ F- W
~ = ~ W LLI ~ N
N ~-
L N W a ~ Q W
Q
z ~
m Q
w m
~ O
Y Q
a ~
a ~
Z
H
W
w
Q
O
~ x x x x x x o
ti
M X X X X X X X
M
M X X X X X X X
M X X X X X X X
~ o x x o x x o
w
~~
~
~-
M
N
O
O
M
tea
w X .-
n ~
in .-
~ ~
n ~-
~ i .-
n ~
n
Fw o o o o o 0 0
W ~ ~
i a m W Q
Z Q ~
N
O =
V Z
Q N
W 2
U
~1 ~
~
L V) ~ Z J
~ 2 0C W W A N
~ a a ~ ~
i ci w Q w
Q
z ~
m Q
w m
w O
Y Q
a ~
a ~
c~
Z
W
W
Q
O
z
E
`o
-~ a
~ o
~Z ~
X O
w ~~
a~
~ ~ a~i ~
~~~Eca
~~QZ
a a ~~ „ z
unw
~~ ,
xoOz
w
Y
IP12
MINUTES
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PRELIMINARY
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 - 6:30 PM
LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Chappell, Andy Douglas, Charlie Drum, Jarrod Gatlin,
Holly Jane Hart, Michael McKay, Rebecca McMurray, Brian
Richman, Rachel Zimmerman Smith
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Tracy Hightshoe
OTHERS PRESENT: None
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council
action):
None.
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Brian Richman at 6:30 p.m.
As there are three new members to the Commission (Zimmerman Smith, Chappell, and Gatlin)
brief introductions were made.
APPROVAL OF THE JULY 16T" MEETING MINUTES:
Drum motioned to approve.
Chappell seconded.
Hart clarified that a comment she had made regarding Dolphin Pointe Enclave was made in the
context of supporting rental housing, although that context was not clear from the minutes.
The minutes were approved 8-0 (McMurray not present at the time of vote).
PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA:
No members of the public were present.
STAFFICOMMISSION COMMENT:
Hightshoe said that she did not have any comments aside from what was on the agenda,
although she noted that staff was recently notified of a problem with a proposed City-assisted
Habitat home on I Street. Hightshoe said that Habitat was awarded FY08 CDBG funds to buy
four housing lots. Hightshoe said there was a title opinion that did not identify any problems at
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009
PAGE 2 of 8
the time of purchase, but that when Habitat went to build it was discovered that there had been
an illegal lot-split in 1992. It was determined that there is no way to configure the lot so that it is
a legal lot. At the time of the discovery, Habitat had already built the home's foundation. A
stop-work order has been issued. Hightshoe said Habitat used $30,000 in CDBG funds to
purchase the lot. Hightshoe said a home can't be built on the lot. She will update the
commission once more is known.
Richman asked for clarification on what the issue with the lot was. Hightshoe repeated that
there had been an illegal lot-split by the property's owner in 1992. Richman asked if this meant
that the owner had subdivided the lot. Hightshoe said the owner had not gone though the City's
process to subdivide. While there were two auditor's parcel numbers for the lots, it was not a
legal split. The issue was not picked up in the title/lien search, but the neighbors remembered
and informed the City about the issue when they learned that a Habitat home was to be built on
the site. As a result, Housing Inspection Services (HIS) had to review all of the records and
determined that there was no way to make a legal lot out the property. Hightshoe said there
was to have been a volunteer work-build for the home this weekend that had been cancelled
because of the issue. Hightshoe said she was unsure what would happen from here.
Hightshoe said the Community Development Celebration went well and that a lot of positive
comments were received. The appetizers for the event were purchased from three CDBG-
assisted businesses by First American Bank, and were very well-received.
Douglas said the Commission would be hosting a public event as a way of doing public
outreach and education. He said the event will be held October 28, 2009 at the Iowa City Public
Library. Don Otto and Greg Johnson will be speaking on green-building and its affordability.
The event will begin at 7:00 PM. Hightshoe said that a reminder would be put in
Commissioners' October packets. Richman asked if Douglas was planning on doing some
marketing and publicity for the event and Douglas said that he intended to.
NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Richman stated that each year in the fall a Chairperson and Vice-Chair are elected to serve a
one-year term. Hightshoe noted that Richman had been serving as Chair and Charlie Drum had
served as Vice-Chair. She invited nominations.
McKay nominated the incumbents to retain their positions: Brian Richman as Chair,
Charlie Drum as Vice-Chair.
Hart seconded.
There were no further nominations.
A vote was taken and Brian Richman was voted Chairperson and Charlie Drum was voted
Vice-Chair on a 9-0 vote.
NEW BUSINESS:
PUBLIC HEARING AND APPROVAL OF THE FY09 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL
PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER):
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009
PAGE 3 of 8
Richman explained that this is a document required by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) for cities receiving CDBG funds and requested Hightshoe further explain
the report.
Hightshoe stated the City has a 5 year plan on how to address the needs of low-to-moderate
income persons which is called the Consolidated Plan for Housing, Jobs and Services for Low
Income Residents (a.k.a. CITY STEPS). The plan is broken into annual increments. The City
must submit to HUD an annual action plan before the beginning of the fiscal year to explain how
the City will spend its HOME and CDBG funds based on the goals and priorities established in
CITY STEPS. At the end of each fiscal year, the City must report its accomplishments for that
year and demonstrate progress on meeting the goals identified, this report is called the
Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER).
The CAPER outlines what projects were assisted, how much money was spent, who benefitted
from the project and provides a summary of to how well the City is doing in meeting its 5-year
and annual goals. Hightshoe said that due to work on flood-related disaster recovery funds and
programs, the City has hired a consultant to complete the CAPER this year. Hightshoe said
there have been some issues with the required CAPER documents, specifically IDIS reports
(HUD's disbursement and accounting system).
She said that while the consultants did their report as directed, HUD has gone to a new
accounting/reporting system which has led to inaccuracies in some of the beneficiary/financial
reports needed to complete the CAPER. Hightshoe said that HUD is working on the problem,
but that all of the bugs are not worked out. Hightshoe said she did not believe an extension
would need to be requested from HUD, as the problem is on HUD's end. She said the narrative
of the report will be submitted, but that the IDIS reports will be submitted once HUD has
corrected program errors and the reports are accurate. Richman asked if he was correct in his
understanding that the errors in the reports were coming from HUD, not the consultants.
Hightshoe said that was correct. Hightshoe pointed out several of the inaccuracies that were
showing up in the reports. She said there were also a number of things in this draft of the report
that still need to be confirmed, updated or changed by the consultant.
McMurray asked several questions regarding the content of the report which Hightshoe clarified.
Drum asked about the statement in the plan that reported Iowa City does not have any areas
that have heavy concentrations of low-to-moderate income households or minority groups. He
said that it seemed to him that Iowa City does have areas of concentration for these groups and
he wondered if it was a question of what definition HUD was using for "heavy" and
"concentration." Hightshoe said that according to HUD a "concentration" of a minority
population is an area that has ten percent more minorities than the City average. Hightshoe said
that the numbers the City must use are based on 2000 census data, so the information is
somewhat old. Drum noted that things have changed greatly since the year 2000. Richman
noted that the fact that Iowa City is a University town really skews the numbers. Hightshoe said
that it does because a large number of students are below the poverty level. Hightshoe said
that, with a few exceptions, basically the entire city has a heavy concentration of tow income
because of the student population, and because of this the City has no defined target areas.
When asked by Commissioners, Hightshoe stated that the definition of "concentration" can be
set locally.
Hightshoe walked Commissioners through a map showing the census tract data. Richman said
that presumably if only permanent, non-student residents were taken into account, areas of
concentration would be found. Hightshoe said that there is no easy way to separate students
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009
PAGE 4 of 8
out using census data, so the consultants used age groups to help sift the data, presuming
those households with heads of household under 24-years old to be students. Richman asked
if the results showed clearer areas of concentration for low-to-moderate income families when
the students were removed from the equation. She said she was aware that many people
would assume that southeast Iowa City is an area of concentration, but that area has one of the
highest rates of home-ownership based on the 2000 census. If the downtown tracts are
removed, the far west side of town, the area directly west of the river and the south side of town
would be considered areas of low-to-moderate income. Only the far north east and a sliver on
the west side would not meet the criteria based on the 2000 Census. She reiterated that using
the 2000 census data and leaving the students in results in almost the entire town being low-to-
moderate income, and as a result, no targeting is done.
Zimmerman Smith asked if the City was required to use census data. Hightshoe said that HUD
uses census data so that numbers can be compared for all of the entitlement cities in the
country. Hightshoe said that all funding is based on census figures such as poverty levels, age
of housing stock, number of people, etc. Hart asked Hightshoe to define what a census tract is.
A census tract is a set boundary, defined by the Census. Hightshoe thought that the goal of
each tract was to have about the same number of residents, but doesn't believe that works out
over time. She said that some of the census tracts are quite large and some are small, and that
she did not see any real rhyme or reason as to why that was the case. Douglas asked if
Hightshoe wanted edits from the Commissioners for the CAPER. She said that if there were
typographical errors that would not substantially change the document she would make the
revision. She also stated if anyone notices an inaccurate statement to let her know so that it
could be corrected. Richman asked if there were substantial problems with the document that
Hightshoe had caught other than the faulty data that had been discussed. She said that there
were not.
Richman asked if it would be possible to get documents that need to be reviewed a bit earlier,
as three days could sometimes be a bit short. Richman said if something of this magnitude
could be distributed to Commissioners as much as two weeks in advance, although any
additional time would be very helpful. Hightshoe said that the schedule for the consultant stated
staff would receive the draft one week before the commission meeting. Hightshoe
acknowledged this was a mistake as staff should have put an earlier date in the schedule to
allow more time for review -both staff and commission. Typically, the CAPER is done in-house,
thus staff is already very familiar with the document. If contracted out again, Hightshoe stated
deadlines for submittal would allow more notice and review. Hightshoe said that next year staff
anticipates the CAPER will once again be done in-house.
Hart motioned to approve the FY09 Consolidated Annual Performance & Evaluation
Report (CAPER) with corrections as noted by Staff.
Drum seconded.
The motion carried 9-0.
SELECTION OF PROJECTS TO MONITOR IN FY10:
Richman explained that each winter the Commission allocates the City's CDBG and HOME
funds to a variety of agencies (primarily non-profits) who apply for funds. Subsequently, the
Commission contacts and monitors the agencies to ensure that the funds are being spent in
accordance with the terms and to see how the projects are coming along. Richman said that
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009
PAGE 5 of 8
this is done by each Commissioner selecting a few projects to monitor. He invited
Commissioners to select a few from the list for FY10.
McKay said he is interested in monitoring Isis Investments LLC, First Mennonite-Home Ties
Addition and the Free Medical Clinic-Operations.
Drum said he would monitor the DVIP-Facility Rehabilitation, the Arc of Southeast Iowa-Facility
Rehabilitation, The Housing Fellowship-Affordable Rental, and The Housing Fellowship-CHDO
Operating Expense.
Gatlin opted to monitor NCJC-Facility Rehabilitation, MECCA-Facility Rehabilitation and UAY-
Facility Rehabilitation.
Richman asked if Dolphin International actually needed monitoring since they had not actually
had funds dispersed to them. Hightshoe said that they would need some monitoring as the City
cannot yet force them to recapture the funds. She said staff had given Dolphin a deadline to
inform the City of their intentions. Richman said he would monitor this program.
McMurray will be monitoring Shelter House-Operations (STAR Program) and New Construction,
and Community Mental Health-Facility Rehabilitation.
Hart will monitor Bill Wittig-Rental Rehabilitation and Successful Living-Operations.
Zimmerman Smith will monitor ICHA-Tenant Based Rent Assistance for FY10 and FY09 and
FY09 Downpayment Assistance.
Chappell will be monitoring FY08 Blooming Garden, FY08 Wetherby, and FY08 & FY07 Habitat
for Humanity.
Douglas is monitoring FY09 HACAP-Transitional Housing and Aid to Agencies (UAY, ESI,
MECCA).
Hightshoe said she will formalize the list next month. Richman noted that Hightshoe sends out
contact information about each agency when she sets the agenda, and that if anyone has any
questions about the project they are to monitor they can contact her.
TIMELINE FOR THE REVIEW OF THE 2010-2015 CONSOLIDATED PLAN:
Hightshoe said that the same consultants working on the Housing Market Analysis are also
working on the Consolidated Plan. She said that the consultants had gotten public input in a
forum setting earlier this spring, and that they had also made an online survey available, which
close to 500 people had participated in. Hightshoe said the results from the survey about
community needs are conflicting. Hightshoe cited an example that 62% of respondents
supported helping the homeless become self-sufficient; however, the majority of respondents
did not support any of the activities that would help achieve that goal, such as: expanding
emergency shelter, expanding housing for person with HIV/AIDS, helping those on rental
assistance purchase their homes, expanding housing for low-wage households, etc. Hightshoe
said that the consultants said it was not uncommon to see such a dichotomy in survey results.
She said that often people support an altruistic goal, but are not sure how to get there.
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009
PAGE 6 of 8
Hightshoe also distributed comments to Commissioners that the consultants had received from
community service providers, which, she noted, had a different outlook than the online
participants. Drum asked why Hightshoe thought there had been such a large response to the
survey. (She had noted that it was the largest response the consultants had ever received.)
Hightshoe said that the community is a very vocal one. Hart said it also depends on who
actually shows up to participate. Hightshoe noted that there was a very large turnout. Chappell
asked if there was a mechanism to stop people from taking the survey multiple times.
Hightshoe said she did not know. She said it was advertised and posted throughout the
community. Richman asked how the plan will utilize the survey data as opposed to the more
objective data that might have come out of the Housing Market Analysis. Hightshoe said that
she believed the survey will be weighted with the provider comments and the Housing Market
Analysis. She said she believed there would be a rough draft of the full Consolidated Plan on
October 9th. at which time a copy will be forwarded to the Commission. All comments must be
returned to the consultants by November 9th, and the consultants will return a final draft by
December 1St
Zimmerman Smith asked if the idea behind the survey was to get community input for the
Consolidated Plan, and Hightshoe said it was. Hightshoe reiterated that the contradiction in
survey results is not uncommon according to the consultant. Hightshoe said she thought people
perhaps thought the services were necessary, but that the City should not be providing them.
Richman said that so much of the survey is very perceptual. Douglas asked if Hightshoe saw
any significant changes between the survey results of five years previous and the current ones.
She said that an online survey was not done at that time, but that the provider comments were
very similar in character.
Richman asked Hightshoe to recap the timeline. Hightshoe said that she will receive a draft on
October 9th and will forward it to Commissioners. The Commission will then meet on October
15th. Hightshoe offered to delay the meeting until October 22"d to give more time to review the
document. Richman said that would be very helpful, and asked if it had to be reviewed in
October. Highhtshoe said it did as comments and changes had to be back to the consultants by
November 9t . She said she agreed that more time was probably needed for Commissioners to
review the document. McMurray said that she would probably not be available for either
meeting as her pregnancy due date was that week. It was agreed to meet on October 22"d
Hightshoe noted that technically the document did not have to be done until May or June, but
that because the Commission starts its funding allocation so early in the year that means
applications are made available in December and applicants need to know what the priorities
are for that year. The document will not be approved by HUD when applications begin, but it
will serve as a guide for priorities.
Zimmerman Smith asked if there was a way to determine what programs have actually worked
and had successful outcomes before the priorities are set. She noted that what might be a high
priority might not necessarily have a program that will match up with it. Hightshoe said that
there would have to be a lot of digging, and that the right questions would have to be asked to
make that determination. Hightshoe said that during the Aid to Agency and CDBG funding
processes this sort of information is required. She cited the example of Elder Services, which
must show that people using case management were able to stay in their homes for a longer
period of time than those without case management services. UAY, Hightshoe said, tracks
teenagers who have been pregnant to see if they become pregnant again within five years in an
attempt to determine if their prevention programs are working. MECCA keeps a multitude of
statistics to determine the success rates of their treatment programs. Richman noted that
during the application process there are questions and answer sessions with the applicant. At
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009
PAGE 7 of 8
that time, Commissioners can ask for specifics and statistics. Douglas noted that site visits are
also done for many projects.
McMurray asked if the City can apply for funding. Hightshoe said that it can and has. She
noted that HIS and the Iowa City Housing Authority have applied for funding for code
enforcement and tenant based rent assistance. Some times they are successful, sometimes
they are not, but they still have to go through the same process as all other applicants. The
Wetherby splash pad project was essentially a Parks and Recreation application. Hightshoe
said that many entitlement cities use their money to fund city services. McMurray asked if the
police could apply to address the safety and crime concerns reflected in the survey and the
public comments. Hightshoe said that they could but that it could be problematic in that there
would be a maximum of $10,000 available for public services and the funding would only be for
one year.
Richman said that one of the challenges that the Commission has always faced is that CITY
STEPS (a guiding document) identifies virtually everything as a high priority. Richman said it
forces Commissioners to make more subjective judgments of their own about what they
perceive to be high priorities in the community. Richman asked if Hightshoe had discussed with
the consultants the possibility of having a better differentiation of priorities this time around.
Hightshoe said she that she had, and that she informed them that the Commission would like to
see about the same number of high, medium and low priority items. Richman asked if the
consultants would be at the October HCDC meeting. Hightshoe said she did not believe so.
She said she believed they would be back for the public hearing process for the Consolidated
Plan.
Gatlin asked where the Commission's focus lies as far as priorities are concerned. McKay said
that one of the issues the Commission deals with is that there are so many good projects and so
much need that it really can be difficult to make decisions about how to fairly distribute the
limited funding available. Drum said it is rare to find a project that is not worthy of funding.
McMurray said she felt the $2,500 minimum was helpful. Richman said that affordable housing
is the "800-pound gorilla" and is an area of great need in the community and is where most of
the dollars go. Drum said there is often a fundamental question of whether those dollars should
go toward home ownership or rental assistance; he said he's not entirely swayed in either
direction but is leaning toward rental as it requires less money. Hart said that another
component of that, which is her concern, is the concentration of rental housing ownership and
management, and the need for diversification of populations throughout the city. Hart said the
City would have to do a lot to mitigate that problem, but that there are small steps the
Commission can work toward on that issue. McKay said that another question that is
sometimes asked is how successful a group has been with the funds given in the past. Gatlin
thanked the Commissioners for their comments.
ADJOURNMENT:
McKay motioned to adjourn.
Gatlin seconded.
The motion carried 9-0.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Z
O
N
O
U
H
Z
W
a
0
W
W
~_
Z
O
U
D
Z
a
c~
z_
N
O
O
U
W
W ~
() O
Z ~
a N
D
Z
W
H
a
1 I I
1 1 1
1 I I
N X X X X X X X X X
~ I
I W
O X X O X ~ ~ X X
ti
N p X ~ ~ X ~ X X ~ X ~ X
X X ~ X X X X ~ X X X
N . X X X X ~ X ~ X X X
M
M ~ X X ~ X X X X ~ ~ X X
X ~ X X X X ~ X X X
N
N
'
G
Z
G
Z
I
'
G
Z
G
Z
G
Z C
G
Z
I
' C
G
Z c
G
Z c
G
Z
N x x ~ o x o x o x x
N ~- O N
O O ~- •-- O N
O O
r
O
O
r
W X
H' W O
~ r
O
O •--
O
~ N
~ r
O
O r
O
~ r
O
O r
O
O N
~ ~
O ~
O
~ O
~
O O O O O O O O O O O O
W
Z a
U
W
2
~
~
U
Z Z ~ o ~ Q ~ a N a W W
J N =
~ '~ O ~ a z ~ U N U
~
a
Q J
> > Z
~ =
~ ~Q
a ~ a
_ ~ W
~ V Z
~ ~
a Q
~
a
Z 2
U O
D ~
D a
U a
2 ~
~ ~
~
~ U
~ ~a
N A m
G ~
U 2
V1
N `
~ ~
x ~' E
_ W ~ ~
~c~~
~~~~
aQZz
n n ii n
W
YXOZ
IP13
MINUTES
YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
October 8, 2009 - 7:30 PM
LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL
Members Present: Zach Wahls, Hannah Green, Jerry Gao, Luan Heywood
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Marian Karr, Ross Wilburn
Others Present: None
CALL TO ORDER:
PRELIMINARY
The meeting was called to order at 7:33 p.m. Hannah Green chaired the meeting. Before any
other business took place, Karr noted that the "Broadway" or "Fas Trac" group the Commission
had been referring to in their previous meeting is called "The Coalition." The minutes had been
appropriately changed.
MINUTES:
Gao motioned to approve the minutes of October 1.
Wahls seconded.
The motion passed 4-0.
YOUTH FORUM:
The Commission quickly worked through a rough email that had been complied by Wahls to
reflect the full nature of the youth forum. These changes primarily made the email suitable for
Junior High and High School counselors. The forum was also shortened from 2:00 - 5:00 pm to
2:00 - 4:00 pm.
The Commission then compiled questions for the presenters, which will include the police, The
Coalition and the Iowa City Neighborhood Association. These questions are:
1) What changes in neighborhood safety have you seen and/or experienced?
2) What steps could be taken to increase safety in our neighborhoods?
3) Share your perspective of the proposed curfew ordinance.
4) What role can youth play to address safety issues in our neighborhoods?
Heywood also noted that Mr. Harper told her that he has two students who are interested in
joining the YAC.
YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
October 8, 2009
Page 2 of 5
Wahls requested that the representative of the police force come in plain clothes.
The Commission then put together an agenda for the forum, which is as follows:
• Introduction by YAC [5 min]
• Presentations regarding public safety situation [30-45 min]
o Police
o Coalition
o Iowa City Neighborhood Associations
• Intermission [10 min]
• Small group discussion [30-40 min]
• Synthesis/sharing session [20 min]
• Open mic (youth only) [20 min+]
The Commission also discussed whether or not to televise or record the forum. The
Commission agreed to tape the presentation, synthesis and open mic sections. Wahls asked if
the Commission could give a presentation of their own to Council, reporting the results of the
forum. Karr said that this was could be done at the public presentation period at the Council
meetings November 2 or 17, or during discussion of the deferred curfew ordinance on
December 1. Written comments are due the Wednesday prior to the meeting for distribution in
the Thursday Council packet.
Wahls and Green formed a subcommittee to put together the opening remarks for the forum.
The four discussion questions will be:
1. What was your reaction to the presentations?
2. What have your experiences in your community or neighborhood been?
3. What you think youth can do to help make ours a safer community?
4. What tools do you think are best suited to dealing with this problem?
BUDGET FY11:
The Commission then went through their budget for FY11. The Commission decided to
discontinue its participation in the Summer of the Arts Global Village. When the Commission
began to discuss the website & advertising, Heywood asked if it would be possible for us to
contact a marketing student at the college of business to do some pro-bono work. Karr said that
was definitely possible. Wahls requested that the carnival spending be replaced with $1,000 for
hosting youth forums and an additional $1,000 for proving two Recognition scholarships at $500
each. The Commission unanimously agreed to these reallocations. Wahls will prepare a
summary for attaching to the budget application to be prepared by Karr.
YOUTH EMPOWERMENT GRANTS:
Gao and Wahls were appointed to this subcommittee.
YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION
October 8, 2009
Page 3 of 5
MEETING SCHEDULE:
The November 15t meeting will be the next meeting, other than the youth forum on Saturday,
October 24. Heywood reported that Henri Harper had expressed interest in attending a future
YAC meeting.
ADJOURNMENT:
Wahls motioned to adjourn.
Heywood seconded.
The motion passed 4-0.
Meeting adjourned 9:05 PM
Z
O
N ~
~ ~
~ O
O w rn a
~-' W N ~
~ U ~ c
O Z Q
o z } ~
aW
~a
O
X X X ~ ,
X
;
N X ~ O X X ~ X i
ti
N X X X X X
ti
X X ~ X X
ti
N
X
0
X
X
X
r`
0 X X X X X
`n
cc X X ~ X X X
X ~ X X X
M
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X ~ X X X
M X X X X X
N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i
Z Z Z Z Z i
' ' '
N
z z z z ~ ~ ~ z
°~° X X X X
~ Z Z Z Z Z
07
O O
O O
O O O O O
O O
O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ r r- ~ c-
~
W
F- d
X
W ~
N
r- c~
N
~ ch
N
r- c~
N
~ c~
N
~ ch
N
r- c~
N
~ c~
N
~-
w
~
z
~~
~
~
~
~
~
=
~ --
Q
~
Q
U
~.
_
~
~
Q
~.
~
~
~
~
~
~
a
~
_ ~ ~ J N ~ 7 ~
L
m~
O
3Z ~
v ~~
X =
W +, y
~ ~ ~
+~ ~,
N ~ N ~ ++
N ~
d Q a Z Z
II II ~ II II
XOOz;
w
Y
z
0
O
00
>°
Q N ~
Q ~ o
_ ~~
H~
z o ~
U ~
~oa
Z
O
~ ~
~_ ~
~ ~
~U
O W rn r
(~ ~ O ro
~' W N ~
~ V ~ C
oZa~
~ Z } ~
Q W
F-
I- Q
O
o X X X X
r-
c X X X X
N X X X X
N X i i X X ~ X ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00
~ ~ ~ r ~ r r r
~
W
I- d
X
W c\
N
~ c\
N
~ M
N
~ M
N
~ c~
N
~- c\
N
~ c~
N
.- c~
N
W
~
~
~
_
~
~
~_
~
~
~
~
~
U
~
2
c
J
-.
Q
~
N
~
~
a~'
~ a~
~
.4
D
L
Q
~a
0
~ z a,
~ ~, ~
K
~+ ~ ~ d
=s=~y~
N~N~.~
rn
aQaz°z°
11 II ~ II II
XOpZ
W
Y