HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-02-24 Public hearing City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
February 19, 1998
City Council p~~,~//,
Karin Franklin, Director
Restaurant in the CN-1 Zone
On your agenda is an item to set a public hearing for March 10, on an amendment to the CN-1
zone to govern restaurants by occupancy load. The intent of this amendment is to address
restaurants from the perspective of the intensity of use in a manner that is more direct than
through the square footage requirement.
Included in your packet is a memorandum to the Planning & Zoning Commission regarding
restaurants in the CN-1 zone and options for amending the ordinance to address this issue. The
Commission will be considering this for the first time at their meeting on February 19; hopefully
they will be able to act on this item on March 5. This information is being sent to the City Council
at this time due to the considerable interest in this issue by a number of Council members. The
staff effort has been to maintain the integrity of the Neighborhood Commercial Zone while
attempting to accommodate some of the interests expressed by members of the City Council.
We believe that addressing this issue through the occupancy load meets this goal. We will have
detailed discussion on this possible amendment at your work session on March 9.
CC:
City Manager
Bob Miklo
Scott Kugler
Im\mem~f2-18.doc
Prepared by: Scott Kugler, Assoc. Planner 410 E.
Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5243
ORDINANCENO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 14,
CHAPTER 6, "ZONING," ARTICLE E,
"COMMERCIAL AND BUSINESS ZONES,"
SECTION 2, "NEIGHBORHOOD COMMER-
CIAL ZONE (CN-1)" REGARDING SIZE
RESTRICTIONS ON RESTAURANTS.
WHEREAS, the City established the CN-1,
Neighborhood Commercial Zone, to encourage
the establishment of small scale neighborhood
oriented commercial uses within residential
neighborhoods to help meet the day-to-day needs
of neighborhood residents, and
WHEREAS, in order to discourage the
development of uses that are out of scale with
adjacent residential neighborhoods, and to
minimize potential negative impacts of commercial
developments on their surrounding residential
neighborhoods, the CN-1 zone regulations contain
size limits on certain types of uses, including
restaurants, and
WHEREAS, currently, restaurants containing
up to 2,500 square feet of gross floor area are
permitted as provisional uses in the CN-1 zone,
and those exceeding 2,500 square feet require
approval of a special exception, and
WHFREA~, the City Council has determined
that the use of the current standard based on the
gross floor area of the restaurant is not an
appropriate method of measuring the scale or
intensity of a restaurant use and whether it is
appropriate for the CN-1 zone, but rather a
standard based on the occupant Icad of the facility
would be a better measure of the potential impact
of the restaurant on the surrounding
neighborhood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY, IOWA:
SECTION I. Title 14, Chapter 6, Zoning, Article E,
Commercial and Business Zones, Section 2,
Neighborhood Commercial Zone (CN-1), be
amended as follows:
Ordinance No.
Page 2
a. Section 14-6E-2C, Provisional Uses, be
amended as follows:
5. Restaurants, provided the floor area doos
not exceod two thousand fi¥o hundrod (2,500)
squaro foet occupancy load does not
exceed [85, 90, 100] for any one restaurant,
and the total floor area allocated to restaurant
use will not exceed twenty percent (20%) of
the total commercial floor area in a CN-1 zone.
b. Section 14-6E-2D, Special Exceptions, be
amended as follows:
6. Restaurants that exceed two thousand fivo
hundred (2,500) squaro feet in floor aroa an
occupancy load of [85, 90, 100], except the
total floor area allocated to restaurant uses will
not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total
commercial floor area in a CN-1 zone.
SECTION II. REPEALER. All ordinances and
parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this Ordinance are hereby repealed.
SECTION III. SEVERABILITY. If any section,
provision or part of the Ordinance shall be
adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such
adjudication shall not affect the validity of the
Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or
part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconsti-
tutional.
SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordi-
nance shall be in effect after its final passage,
approval and publication, as provided by law.
Passed and approved this day of
,1998.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Approved by
City Attorney's Office
ppdadmin\ord~_,n 1 .doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
February 13, 1998 (for February 19 meeting)
Planning & Zoning Commission
Scott Kugler, Associate Planner
Proposed CN-1 Zone Amendment - Restaurant Floor Area Limitations
City Council has requested that staff and the Commission review possible amendments to
the provisions of the Neighborhood Commercial (CN-1) zone that deal with restaurants.
This request is a result of a number of unsuccessful attempts that have been made to
locate a restaurant within the CN-1 zone at Court Street and Scott Boulevard. A
summarized history of past attempts to gain approval to construct the restaurant is
provided below, followed by a number of options that could be pursued to address the
concerns raised by Council. However, staff feels that it is appropriate to first discuss the
intent of the CN-1 zone and how the current regulations regarding restaurants came about.
The intent section of the CN-1 zone reads as follows:
The Neighborhood Commercial Zone (CN-1) is intended to permit the development
of retail sales and personal services required to meet the day-to-day needs of a fully
developed residential neighborhood. Stores, businesses and offices in the Zone
should be useful to the majority of the neighborhood residents, should be
economically supportable by nearby population, and should not draw community-
wide patronage. A grocery store or grocery store/drugstore combination is favored
at the principal tenant in a Neighborhood Commercial Zone. In general, the CNol
Zone is intended for the grouping of a grocery store and small retail businesses and
office uses which are relatively nuisance-free to surrounding residences and which
do not detract from the residential purpose and character of the surrounding
neighborhood. The location and development of neighborhood commercial sites
should follow the criteria set forth for such sites in the Comprehensive Plan, as
amended.
In the past, it was not uncommon for light commercial uses such as a family owned
grocery store or a neighborhood tavern/restaurant to be found within residential
neighborhoods. Examples in Iowa City include the former Seaton's store at the corner of
Court Street and Muscatine Avenue, and former commercial buildings within the Northside
and Goosetown neighborhoods, many of which have now been converted to residences.
However, for much of this qentury there has been a concerted effort in most American
cities to separate residential and commercial uses to the extent possible. This has occurred
mainly as a result of the increased mobility of the general population since the advent of
the automobile and the changing nature of commercial developments to accommodate
customers in automobiles. As a result, commercial areas tend to be located such that
2
nearly every trip to the store must be made by car, thus increasing congestion on the
cities' street systems. The CN-1 zone is intended to be a step in the opposite direction by
providing small areas throughout the city where some of the shopping or service needs of
residents of the surrounding neighborhood can be provided within walking distance or a
short drive from their homes. The development of a CN-1 zone with neighborhood oriented
uses is not expected to eliminate vehicular trips to regional commercial areas, but it is
hoped that these trips will become less frequent if some of the neighborhood residents'
needs are provided nearby.
The danger in permitting commercial uses within residential neighborhoods is that they
have the potential to draw additional traffic into the surrounding neighborhood and produce
other negative impacts on nearby properties if the scale and nature of the commercial uses
are not carefully managed. It is for this reason that the CN-1 zone includes limitations on
the types and sizes of businesses that may locate there, and also contains design
provisions aimed at integrating the commercial areas into the rest of the neighborhood.
There are limitations on the number of parking spaces that can be provided for most uses,
landscaping requirements, provisions to ensure pedestrian connections to the surrounding
areas, and some building design guidelines, all of which are intended to result in an
attractive, small scale appearance that will be compatible with the surrounding area.
The very nature of the CN-1 zone and the population it is intended to serve almost requires
that its development be delayed pending the development of the surrounding residential
neighborhood. This requires patience on the part of the developer. An example is the
Walden Square development on Mormon Trek Boulevard, which slowly developed over a
number of years until the surrounding population grew to a level which could help support
the types of businesses permitted in the CN-1 zone, along with business from through-
traffic on Mormon Trek Boulevard. One of the reasons that the Scott Court CN-1 zone has
not experienced the rapid development of neighborhood oriented uses is because only half
of its immediate neighborhood market area is developed (generally the area west of Scott
Boulevard). Unless a CN-1 zone is introduced into an existing neighborhood on an infill
site, it is likely that there will be a delay before neighborhood oriented uses are attracted to
the site. Otherwise, businesses locating there will have to rely on a much broader
customer base and draw customers into the neighborhood from a wider region.
Restaurants in the CN-1 Zone: Currently, the CN-1 zone allows restaurants of up to 2,500
square feet as provisional uses, meaning that they can be established upon administrative
approval of a site plan and the issuance of a building permit, without any public review
before a City board or commission. For restaurants containing more than 2,500 square
feet, a special exception is required, which involves a public review of the plans by the
Board of Adjustment. The Board can approve or deny the application based' on general
standards that deal with an application's potential impact on surrounding properties, and on
an application's compliance with the Zoning Chapter. Restaurants with drive-thru or drive-
up windows are not permitted. The current regulations were adopted in 1994 after being
reviewed by the Commission and City Council. Prior to that time, all restaurants in the CN-
1 zone required a special exception regardless of their size. The changes were requested
by a developer who felt that smaller restaurants would be consistent with the intent of the
CN-1 zone and should be subject to less stringent review than larger restaurants. The
1994 change allowed for a more streamlined approval process for smaller scale
restaurants.
3
In researching the 1994 amendment, staff studied existing restaurants within the City and
reviewed standards suggested in various planning and zoning publications to determine
where the threshold should fall. The 2,500 square foot limitation was consistent with both
sets of findings. In implementing the regulations, the size of the restaurant is based on the
gross floor area of the building, which includes all of the facility, including the seating area,
kitchen, and storage areas. Since that time, special exceptions have been approved to
permit two 3,200 square foot restaurants within the Walden Square development and to
allow a 3,376 square foot restaurant at 200 Scott Court. Two applications have been
denied for restaurants of 4,000 and 4,666 square feet at 200 Scott Court.
History of Attempts to Develop a Restaurant at 200 Scott Court: As mentioned above,
Council's request to consider changes to the CN-1 zone regulations was driven by problems
that a specific proposed restaurant has had in trying to locate within the Scott Court CN-1
zone. The proposed development of this restaurant has been the subject of three special
exception applications before the Board of Adjustment, two of which were denied, and a
failed attempt to obtain a building permit following the one Board approval for the
restaurant. Since the Planning and Zoning Commission was not directly involved in these
cases, a brief history is provided below.
In 1995, an application was filed by John and Ada Streit for a special exception to allow a
4,000 square foot restaurant to be constructed on the property located at 200 Scott Court.
The application was accompanied by a site plan which indicated that 46 parking spaces
were to be provided, which exceeded the maximum number of parking spaces permitted for
that use in the CN-1 zone. No building elevations were provided, as required. In addition,
the site plan contained a number of deficiencies and did not comply with a number of
Zoning Chapter provisions. Staff attempted to work with the applicants to design a scaled-
back plan that was more consistent with the intent of the CN-1 zone, but the applicants
chose to go forward with their original submittal. Staff recommended denial of the
application based on the size and scale of the proposed use and its inconsistency with the
intent and design provisions of the CN-1 zone, as well as the technical deficiencies
contained on the site plan. The Board of Adjustment concurred with staff's assessment
and denied the request.
In 1996, an application was filed by Steve Kohli, who intended to be the lot owner and
developer of the Streits' restaurant. The application was for a 3,376 square foot
restaurant and a 35-space parking lot with 11 additional "landbanked" spaces which could
have been added if it was demonstrated that they were needed after the facility was
opened. Staff worked with the applicant to have the technical deficiencies with the site
plan corrected, and recommended approval of the application subject to conditions. The
Board of Adjustment approved the application with conditions as recommended by staff.
In 1997, property owner Plum Grove Acres applied for a building permit to construct the
restaurant. However, the plans included a 1,200+ square foot basement area, for a total
of 4,576 square feet. Under the Zoning Chapter, the square footage of a use includes all
space devoted to that use, including basements and additional stories. The Building Official
was of the opinion that a few hundred square feet of basement floor area could be added
for mechanical equipment such as a furnace or water heater, but the size being proposed
would likely result in the restaurant use occupying a portion of the basement, such as
4
storage or office area. The applicant was unwilling to diminish the size of the basement to
coincide with the accommodation proposed by the Building Official. Staff felt that the
location of these components of the restaurant in the basement would result in more of the
first floor of the restaurant being devoted to seating area. It appeared that what was
requested was in excess of the size of the restaurant approved by the Board, and a building
permit was not issued.
Later in 1997, an application for a special exception for a 4,666 square foot restaurant was
submitted by Hodge Construction Company on behalf of the Streits. This application was
similar to the application previously approved, but included a 1,290 square foot basement.
The Board denied this application based on the size and scale of the restaurant.
Current Request/Options: Council is now requesting that staff and the Commission
reassess the way restaurants are regulated in the CN-1 zone. All components of a
restaurant are counted when determining the size of a restaurant, not just the seating area.
The definition of floor area includes "It]he total of all floors of a building . . ." and includes
"Is]paces in the basement or cellar... if used for a principal or accessory use permitted in
the zone in which the building is located." In the absence of a kitchen, food preparation
area, or an area to store food, a seating area is not much of a restaurant. If in the case of
the Streits' proposal much of the storage and office space was permitted to be located
within a basement, the main level floor area available for seating would have been much
larger and would have allowed a more intensive use of the property than originally
contemplated when it was approved.
Additional information has been collected on the size of existing Iowa City restaurants and
is attached to this memorandum. Since the existence of basement storage areas was not
investigated in 1994 when the restaurant size limitations were put in place, staff attempted
to collect this information, as well as floor area and occupancy or number of seats, for a
number of Iowa City restaurants. Of the 34 restaurants included, seven contained finished
basement areas, four contained unfinished basement areas, and 23 contained no
basements. It does not appear that the additional information on basements would have
affected staff's recommendation in 1994 regarding the floor area threshold of 2,500 square
feet.
Staff's research of other ordinances and national planning publications conducted in 1994
suggested that there be a maximum floor area for a restaurant in a neighborhood
commercial zone of 2,500 to 3,000 square feet, and the research on Iowa City restaurants
suggested a similar figure. A decision was made to allow restaurants of 2,500 square feet
by right, and allow the Board to approve larger restaurants on a case by case basis if it
feels that they are appropriate for the CN-1 zone. Staff is unaware of any substantial
changes recommended by national planning and zoning publications for restaurants in
neighborhood commercial areas over the past few years. In general, the recommendation
is aimed at limiting negative impacts on surrounding residential properties that can be
generated by higher occupancy restaurants. Iowa City's CN-1 zone is a bit more flexible in
that restaurants over the specified size are permitted by special exception rather than
simply excluded from that zone.
Listed below are a number of different options that have been identified for amending the
CN-1 zone with regard to restaurants. Staff recommends that the Commission discuss the
proper course of action at its February 19 meeting, after which it can review a specific
ordinance with the proposed code changes being recommended, if any, at the March 5
meeting. Although all of the options could be pursued, if changes are to be made to the
regulations staff feels that the fourth option is the most appropriate.
Option One - No Change: Obviously, with this option the CN-1 zone regulations would not
be changed, and the Streits could either scale back their plans to conform to the
regulations, or find an alternative location within a more suitable commercial zone, such as
the CC-2 or CH-1 zone.
Option Two - Add Specific Criteria for Determining Appropriate Scale of Restaurant: This
option involves adopting design and intensity of use standards for restaurants within the
CN-1 zone, with drive-thru or drive-up windows still being prohibited. Depending on the
nature of the design standards, this could ensure that a development is adequately
screened and buffered from residential areas, is well designed and landscaped, and
architecturally "fits" into the neighborhood in terms of appearance. Building size would
likely be one of a number of factors considered. Others might include site design, size of
the parking lot, a site's location within the neighborhood and its anticipated traffic impact,
and the type of restaurant and its expected turnover of customers (i.e., fast food rs. full
service).
This option could involve retaining the threshold that separates those restaurants permitted
as provisional uses and those requiring a special exception, or could be administered by
staff, with appeals of the site plan process coming before the Commission. In the former
case, the approval process would not change, but the criteria for evaluating a larger
restaurant would be spelled out in the ordinance and available for potential applicants to
review before submitting a special exception application. In the latter case, the standards
would have to be written as objectively as possible if a staff review is to be effective.
While the decision in either case would still be somewhat subjective, it would be clear to
applicants what factors will be considered. If this type of review is conducted at the staff
level, it should be subject to a major site plan review regardless of the size of the facility,
rather than a minor site plan review (currently a commercial use under 10,000 square feet
requires only a minor site plan review). The major site plan process allows for some
notification of the neighborhood, and gives the applicant, the Building Official, and the
owners of 20% of the surrounding property within 200 feet of the site an opportunity to
seek a public review of the site plan before the Planning and Zoning Commission if they are
not satisfied with the site plan or staff decision. This option would require additional staff
time to draft a set of standards.
Option Three - Increase Square Foot Requirement of Those Permitted By Right: If 2,500
square feet is felt to be too low of a figure for a restaurant within the CN-1 zone, it could
be increased. However, staff is not comfortable arbitrarily choosing a number without
some rational basis or research to substantiate it. Other communities, such as Pittsburgh,
have higher limits within their neighborhood commercial zones of around 3,000 square feet.
The Board of Adjustment has approved special exceptions to allow two 3,200 square foot
restaurants within the Walden Square CN-1 zone and one of 3,376 on Scott Court.
However, staff feels that it is not advisable to just put a figure in place that allows the
establishment of a large restaurant with no public review or no additional criteria.
6
Option Four - Change the Way Scale of the Restaurant is Calculated: It has been
suggested that one way to address the problem is to base the size limitations on the
footprint of the building rather than the gross floor area. Staff does not feel that this is the
best option since multiple-story restaurants and basement seating areas are permitted, if
proper means of egress are provided to meet the building and fire codes. However, the
idea of changing the way the size of a restaurant is measured to determine the intensity of
use could be considered. The threshold could be changed such that the component of the
use that is likely to have the greatest impact on the surrounding neighborhood, the seating
area, is the primary means of determining the scale of the restaurant and whether or not it
is appropriate for the CN-1 zone. If the restaurant regulations are to be amended, staff
feels that this option is probably the one with the most potential. However, staff is
unaware of other communities who have such a standard in place.
Basing a standard strictly on the size of the seating area would be difficult, as this
information is not readily available and would involve a somewhat time consuming task of
analyzing approved building plans contained in the files of the Housing and Inspection
Services Department. It would also not address differences in the types of seating being
provided within the seating area. However, information on the occupancy load of existing
restaurants is more readily available, as this needs to be determined in order to calculate
the number of parking spaces required, size of the restroom facilities required, proper
exiting requirements, etc. The calculation of a restaurant's occupancy load includes
kitchen and storage areas, but these areas are included at a much lower ratio of persons to
floor area than the public areas of a restaurant. The provision of additional square footage
for storage, whether provided in a basement or on the main floor, would have a minimal
impact on the occupancy of the building. In the case of the proposed 1,200 square foot
basement at 200 Scott Court, the overall occupancy of the building would have increased
by only 4 persons (one person per 300 square feet of storage area). If however, that
1,200 square feet of basement area were to result in a corresponding increase in the size
of the seating area on the main floor, the increase in the occupancy load would be much
greater (generally, one person per 15 square feet or 80).
Using occupancy to establish a threshold would be more appropriate than size of seating
area or floor area of the restaurant. For instance, the occupancy of a certain size seating
area can vary by the type of seating being provided (booths vs. moveable tables and chairs,
counter space, etc.). In addition, some restaurants with relatively little kitchen and storage
space in relation to their seating areas might meet an overall floor area limitation, but result
in a much more intensive use than others of the same size (China Buffet and Jimmy's Brick
Oven Cafe on the attached table appear to have obtained a fairly high occupancy in relation
to their floor area). To determine an appropriate occupancy limit for restaurants in the CN-
1 zone which roughly corresponds to the 2,500 square feet now permitted, some analysis
of the information contained on the attached table is necessary. One approach might be to
sort the restaurants into categories based on whether or not they seem appropriate for the
CN-1 zone, and see if such a categorization suggests an appropriate occupancy level for a
neighborhood commercial center restaurant. Another approach might be to come up with
an estimate of the occupancy load of a typical 2,500 square foot restaurant, the figure
currently being used, and establish the threshold in that manner. Both approaches are
discussed below.
In categorizing the restaurants found in the attached table, staff feels that the following
restaurants might be considered to be appropriate for a neighborhood commercial zone:
Floor Area
Name Occupancy (including basement)
Blimpie/Heyn's 98' 2974
Blimpie (Rochester) 32* 1000
Bruegger's 72 3000
Chill & Grill 43 2300
Cottage 90' 3160
Hamburg Inn 50 3200
Happy Joes 65 2212
Hungry Hobo 100 3220
Linn St Cafe 70 1716
Quizno's 34* 1232
Sushi Pc Pc 63 1836
*Number of seats vs. occupancy Icad
Note: Restaurants appearing on the attached table for which an occupancy Icad was not listed were excluded
from this list, as well as fast food type restaurants which would typically be accompanied by a drive-thru
service not permitted in the CN-1 zone.
Most of these restaurants clearly meet the intent of the neighborhood commercial zone,
although those with occupancy loads of 90 to 100 may be pushing the limit of what should
be permitted in the CN-1 zone without the need for a special exception review. The figures
suggest that an occupancy Icad of less than 100 be used as the threshold for requiring a
special exception. Those with occupancy loads of over 100 seem to be more regional in
nature and are perhaps more appropriate for different commercial zones, unless it can be
demonstrated through the special exception review process that they will not have a
substantial impact on the surrounding neighborhood and will be compatible with the
neighborhood in terms of design and scale.
In considering the second approach, staff divided the total occupancy of each restaurant
listed in the attached table by the gross floor area of the facility, to determine how much
floor area each contains per one unit of occupancy. In most cases, about 30 square feet of
overall restaurant space is provided per one occupant, although this can fluctuate based on
the amount of floor area devoted to kitchen and storage space. Both the mean and median
of the resulting ratios also equals approximately 30. If this factor is applied to a 2,500 to
3,000 square foot restaurant, an occupancy Icad of between 83 and 100 persons is
suggested as an appropriate CN-1 zone restaurant size.
Both methods suggest a similar occupancy range for establishing a maximum restaurant
size that should be permitted by right within the CN-1 zone. Similar to the existing
regulations, this maximum threshold would be established for restaurants to be permitted
as provisional uses, and those above this limit would be required to seek Board approval of
a special exception. Such a standard would address the component of the restaurant that
most closely reflects the degree of impact that it is likely to have on the surrounding
neighborhood. The size of the kitchen or storage area is not nearly as relevant as the
8
number of people that can be accommodated at the facility. Staff continues to recommend
that no drive-thru or drive-up facilities be permitted in the CN-1 zone.
One drawback associated with this option has to do with the amount of information that
needs to be submitted by an applicant at the time of special exception review. Rather than
submitting more general preliminary plans at the special exception stage, and spending the
money to refine those plans only if the special exception is approved, and applicant must
now have more detailed plans prepared prior to the special exception review to determine
what the occupancy of a restaurant will be, at the risk of the plans not being approved by
the Board of Adjustment.
Summary: Changes are being suggested to the CN-1 regulations pertaining to restaurants
because of difficulties that one developer has had in gaining approval for the construction
of a restaurant at 200 Scott Court. Whatever course of action the Commission and City
Council choose to take on this matter, staff recommends that the changes be well thought
out and thoroughly examined to determine whether they are best for the CN-1 zone and the
development of neighborhood oriented commercial centers. It is unwise to base a change
in zoning regulations on a single proposal without closely considering the impact that
change will have city-wide.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Iowa City Restaurants Characteristics List.
Approved by:
Robert Miklo, Senior Planner
Department of Planning and
Community Development
Restaurant
Arby's
Blimpie/Heyn's
Ice Cream/Coffee
Shop
Blimpie
Bruegger's Bagel
Bakery
Burger King
Burger King
China Buffet
Chill & Grill
Cottage Bakery
Country Kitchen
Godfather's Pizza
Ground Round
Hamburg Inn
Happy Joe's
Address
201 S. Clinton
118 S. Dubuque
2221 Rochester
225 Iowa Av.
124 S. Dubuque
1445 Boyrum St.
1931 Broadway St.
206 N. Linn
14 S. Linn St.
1402 S. Gilbert
531 Hwy. 1 W
830 S. Riverside Dr.
214 N. Linn St.
225 S. Gilbert
Iowa City Restaurant Characteristics List
A Selective Sample
Total Occupancy
or Number of
Seats
154 seats
Floor Area (sq.ft.)
(Not including
Basement Floor Area)
3730
Basement Information
No Basement
98 seats
2974
Half unfinished basement
32 seats
Occupancy - 72
Occupancy- 118
94 seats
Occupancy- 178
Occupancy-43
90 seats
Seating Capacity-
194
Seating Capacity-
50
Occupancy-65
1000
3000
3600±
2920
3500
1300
3160
5377
5726
5204
1950
2212
No basement
No basement
Finished basement-600 sq.fi.
No basement
No basement
Basement 1000 sq.ft.
One-quarter basement - 341 sq.ft.
No basement
No basement
No basement
Full basement- 1250 sq.ft.
No basement
Zone
CB 10
CB 10
CN 1
CB 10
CB 10
CI 1
CC 2
CB 2
CB 2
CC 2
CI 1
CC 2
CB 2
CB 10
Restaurant
Hungry
Hobo/That's
Rentertainment
India Caf6
JC's Caf6
Jimmy's Brick
Oven Cafe
SeasoWs Best
(now Jimmy's
Bistro)
La Casa
Linn Street Caf~
Maid-Rite Comer
McDonalds
Mondo's Sports
Caf~
Pagliai's Pizza
Quizno's
Sanctuary
Sushi Po Po
The Mill
Address
517 S. Riverside Dr.
227 E. Washington
1910 S. Gilbert
749 Mormon Trek
Blvd.
325 E. Washington
1200 S. Gilbert Ct.
121 N. Linn St.
1705 S. First Av.
804 S. Riverside Dr.
212 S. Clinton
302 E. Bloomington
370 Scott Court
405 S. Gilbert
725 Mormon Trek
Blvd.
120 E. Burlington
Total Occupancy
or Number of
Seats
Occupancy- 100
Occupancy-
Dining-135
Beer Garden-60
Occupancy- 170
Occupancy-70
Occupancy- 115
Occupancy- 148
34 seats
Occupancy-63
Floor Area (sq. fi.)
(Not including
Basement Floor Area)
3220
3O0O
1750
3126
5830
5730
1716
2200
4330
3620
3280
1232
3530
1836
6803
Basement Information
No basement
Full basement o 2000 sq.fi.
No basement
No basement
No basement
No basement
No basement
No basement
No basement
Unfinished basement
Unfinished basement
No basement
Basement storage - 2241 sq.ft.
No basement
One-quarter unfinished basement
Zone
CC 2
CB 10
CI 1
CN 1
CB 10
CI 1
CB 2
CC 2
CC 2
CB I0
CB 2
CN 1
CB 5
CN 1
CB 10
2
Restaurant
The Vine
Village Inn
Pancake House
Wendy's
Wig and Pen
Yen Ching
Address
330 E. Prentiss St.
9 Sturgis Comer
840 S. Riverside Dr.
1220 Hwy. 6 W
1803 Boyram St.
Total Occupancy
or Number of
Seats
Occupancy- 170
Occupancy-155
Occupancy-90
Occupancy-
120-outside,
49-inside
Occupancy-247
Floor Area (sq.ft.)
(Not including
Basement Floor Area)
2424
4920
2230
3500
6192
Basement Information
No basement
No basement
No basement
No basement
1425-storage in basement
Zoue
CB 5
CC 2
CC 2
CH 1
CI 1
Total Number of Restaurants - 34
Average Floor Area - 3415 sq.ft.
Average Floor Area plus basement area - 3675 sq.ft.
Total Number of Restaurants in the CN 1 Zone - 4
Average Floor Area - 1800 sq.ft.
None of four these restaurants have basements.
updated: 2/13/98
c:Xrnsoffice\winwor\restamd.doc
Form 631.1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Fiscal Year July 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999
City of Iowa City, Iowa
The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed 1998 - 1999 Budget at the Civic Center,
410 E. Washington St. on February 24, 1998 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. The Budget Estimate Summary of
proposed receipts and expenditures is shown below. Copies of the detailed proposed 1998 - 1999
Budget may be obtained 'or viewed at the offices of the Mayor, City Clerk, and at the Library.
The estimated Total tax levy rate per $1000 valuation on regular property is .... $13.13343
The estimated tax levy rate per $1000 valuation on Agricultural land is ............ $ 3.00375
At the public hearing, any resident or taxpayer may present objections to, or arguments in favor of, any
part of the proposed budget.
City Clerk
INational Inflation Factor
2.16%
L
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Taxes Levied on Property 1
Less: Uncollected Property Taxes-Levy Year 2
Net Current Property Taxes 3
Delinquent Property Taxes 4
TIF Revenues 5
Other City Taxes 6
Licenses & Permits 7
Use of Money & Property 8
Intergovernmental 9
Charges for Services 10
Special Assessments 11
Miscellaneous 12
Other Financing Sources 13
Total Revenues & Other Sources 14
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES
Community Protection
(police,fire,street lighting, etc.) 15
Human Development
(health, library, recreation, etc.) 16
Home & Community Environment
(garbage, streets, utilities, etc.) 17
Policy & Administration
(mayor, council, clerk, legal, etc.) 18
Non-Program 19
Total Expenditures 20 1
Less:
Debt Service 21
Capital Projects 22 ·
Net Operating Expenditures 23
Transfers Out 24
Total Expenditures/Transfers Out 25 1
Excess Revenues & Other Sources Over
(Under) Expenditures/Transfers Out 26
Beginning Fund Balance July I 27
Ending Fund' Balance June 30 28
Explanation of any FY97 to FY 99 average % change (& "NEW"
Budget Re-estimated Actual
FY 1999 FY 1998 FY 1997
21,733,964 20,424,857 19,726,650
21,733,964 20,424,857 19,726,650
50,000 62,000 55,572
456,787 456,000 465,670
600,735 543,200 624,614
3,162,056 3,361,203 4,412,528
14,461,251 21,239,851 17,155,660
32,403,931 30,196,980 28,321,987
23,501 23,501 106,590
5,404,984 3,391,451 2,542,832
119,573,540 98,119,656 63,551,507
197,870,749 177,818,699 136,963,610
Average
% Change
FY 97 to 99
4.96%
-0.96%
Property taxes are proposed to increase by 4.96% over two years (FY97 to FY99) due to valuation growth, new
construction and increased debt service property taxes. Property taxes reflect a state required decrease of -$124,772
within the debt service and employee benefit levies due to state 100% funding of homestead and other property tax
credits.
A summary of the expenditure program changes proposed over two years (FY97 to FY99) is as follows: COMMUNITY
PROTECTION: 5.29% 2 YR CHG: (4.28% personal services (labor contracts) which is 63% of the 5.29%, 16% in
commodities and 12% in services and charges.) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: 90% 2YR CHG (97% of this change is due to
capital improvement projects, which includes a proposed new library building of $17.7 million which may be placed on
the November 1998 ballot.) HOME &COMMUNITY: 6.51% 2YRCHG:(55% of the change is due to debt for capital
improvement projects; 15% is due to capital improvement projects construction; 18% is due to personal services (labor
contracts); 12% due to commodities, services & charges, and other). POLICY & ADMINISTRATION: 16% 2YR CHG:
(68% of the change is due to capital improvement projects; 12% for personal services (labor contracts); 5% for
services and charges; and 15% in capital outlay).
11,386,953 12,046,496 10,270,835 5.29%
28,147,566 13,767,756 7,787,381 90.12%
73,087,291 90,425,522 64,428,215 6.51%
7,436,030 6,041,432 5,500,810 16.27%
0
20,057,840 122,281,206 87,987,241
13,475,434 10,241,079 9,146,037
54,137,231 57,951,143 28,649,820
52,445,175 54,088,984 50,191,384
71,912,553 69,837,266 48,126,434
91,970,393 192,118,472 136,113,675
5,900,356 (14,299,773) 849,935
60,396,474 74,696,247 73,846,312
66,296,830 60,396,474 74,696,247
expenditure program) exceeding the National Inflation Factor:
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
Finance Department Memo
Date:
February 19, 1998
To:
From:
Re:
City Council and City Manager
Don Yucuis, Finance Director
Fiscal Year 1999 Budget Public Hearing - February 24, 1998
I am planning on doing a ten minute summary presentation of the Fiscal
Year 1999 budget as part of the Public Hearing that will be held on
February 24, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. I would like to do that at the beginning of
the Public Hearing.
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 12, 1998
To:
From:
Re:
City Council and City Manager
Donald J. Yucuis, Director of Finance ~
Revisions to the Fiscal Year 1999, 2000 and 2001 Proposed Three-Year Financial
Plan and Capital Improvements Program Budget Through Fiscal Year 2003
A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, February 24, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers regarding the adoption of the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 budget, the FY99, FY2000, and
FY2001 three-year financial plan, and the Capital Improvements Program (CIP) budget through
FY2003. This packet includes the public hearing notice that will appear in the newspaper on
Friday, February 13, 1998, and the forms that are required by the State to be filed with the
adoption resolution.
The attached schedules highlight the changes that have occurred in the FY99, FY2000 and
FY2001 three-year financial plan and the CIP budget between December 1997 and the City
Council's final review and recommendation.
Please note that the FY99 property tax levy rate is set at $13.13343 per $1,000 of taxable
assessed valuation, compared to $12.79617 in FY98. The proposed levy rate of $13.13343
reflects a savings of 7.5 cents to property taxpayers as a result of full reimbursement by the state
for various property tax credits, including homestead, age & income (A&I credit), military and
disabled veterans. ($13.20880 estimated before full credits levy reductions versus $13.13343
proposed after full credits levy reductions.) The 7.5 cents reduction in the levy rate was
accomplished by reducing the debt levy by $25,000 and by reducing the employee benefits levy
by $99,772. The total levy reduction of $124,772 is our estimate of 50% of the additional property
tax credits anticipated over two years (FY98 and FY99). The FY98 budget had been certified to
the state before this legislation was enacted; therefore City Council directed by resolution that
50% of the additional property tax credits in FY98 be used to reduce the FY99 property taxes.
The FY99 tax levy request and total expenditures as published in the newspaper for the public
hearing cannot be increased but can be reduced prior to final approval.
Final City Council approval of the FY99 budget, three-year financial plan, and multi-year CIP plan
is scheduled for March 10, 1998. Two resolutions will be presented for your approval. The first
resolution will approve the FY99 budget. The second resolution will approve the FY99 to FY2001
three-year financial plan and also the multi-year Capital Improvements Program budget through
FY2003.
Please contact me at 356-5052 or Deb Mansfield at 356-5051 if you have any questions.
Attachment
finadm~budget\finplan.doc
Form 631.1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Fiscal Year July 1, 1998 - June 30, 1999
City of Iowa City, Iowa
The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed 1998 - 1999 Budget at the Civic Center,
410 E. Washington St. on February 24, 1998 at 7;O0 o'clock p.m. The Budget Estimate Summary of
proposed receipts and expenditures is shown below. Copies of the detailed proposed 1998 - 1999
Budget may be obtained or viewed at the offices of the Mayor, City Clerk, and at the Library.
The estimated Total tax levy rate per ~ 1000 valuation on regular property is.... $13.13343
The estimated tax levy rate per $1000 valuation on Agricultural land is ............ $ 3.00375
At the public hearing, any resident or taxpayer may present objections to, or arguments in favor of, any
part of the proposed budget.
City Clerk
National Inflation Factor -
Budget Re-estimated Actual
FY 1999 FY 1998 FY 1997
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Taxes Levied on Property 1 21,733,964 20,424,857 19,726,650
Less: Uncollected Property Taxes-Levy Year 2
Net Current Property Taxes 3 21,733,964 20,424,857 19,726,650
Delinquent Property Taxes 4
TIF Rev,,r. ues § 50,000 62,000 55,572
Other City Taxes 6 456,787 456,000 465,670
Licenses & Permits 7 600,735 543,200 624,614
Use of Money & Property 8 3,162,056 3,361,203 4,412,528
Intergovernmental 9 14,461,251 21,239,851 17,155,660
Charges for Services lo 32,403,931 30,196,980 28,321,987
Special Assessments 1 t 23,501 23,501 106,590
Miscellaneous t2 5,404,984 3,391,451 2,542,832
Other Financing Sources 13 119,573,540 98,119,656 63,551,507
Total Revenues & Other Sources 14 197,870,749 177,818,699 136,963,610
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES
Community Protection
(police,fire,street lighting, etc.) 15 11,386,953 12,046,496 10,270,835
Human Development
(health, library, recreation, etc.) 16 28,147,566 13,767,756 7,787,381
Home & Community Environment
{garbage, streets, utilities, etc.) 17 73,087,291 90,425,522 64,428,215
Policy & Administration
(mayor, council, clerk, legal, etc.) 18 7,436,030 6,041,432 5,500,810
Non-Program 19 0
Total Expenditures 2o 120,057,840 122,281,206 87,987,241
Less:
Debt Service 21 13,475,434 10,241,O79 9,146,037
Capital Projects 22 54,137,231 57,951,143 28,649,820
Net Operating Expenditures 23 52,445,175 54,088,984 50,191,384
Transfers Out 24 71,912,553 69,837,266 48,126,434
Total Expenditures/Transfers Out 2D 191,970,393 192,118,472 136,113,675
Excess Revenues & Other Sources Over
(Under) Expenditures/Transfers Out 26 5,900,356 (14,299,773) 849,935
Beginning Fund Balance July I 27 60,396,474 74,696,247 73,846,312
Ending Fund Balance June 30 28 66,296,830 60,396,474 74,696,247
2.16%
Average
% Change
FY 97 to 99
4.96%
-0.96%
5.29%
90.12%
6.51%
16.27%
Explanation of any FY97 to FY 99 average % change (& "NEW" expenditure program) exceeding the National Inflation Factor:
Property taxes are proposed to increase by 4.96% over two years (FY97 to FY99) due to valuation growth, new
construction and increased debt service property taxes. Property taxes reflect a state required decrease of -$124,772
within the debt service and employee benefit levies due to state 100% funding of homestead and other property tax
credits.
A summary of the expenditure program changes proposed over two years (FY97 to FY99) is as fellows: COMMUNITY
PROTECTION: 5.29% 2 YR CHG: (4.28% personal services (labor contracts) which is 63% of the 5.29%, 16% in
commodities and 12% in services and charges.) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: 90% 2YR CHG (97% of this change is due to
capital improvement projects, which includes a proposed new library building of $17.7 million which may be placed on
the November 1998 ballot.) HOME & COMMUNITY: 6.51% 2 YR CHG: (55% of the change is due to debt for capital
improvement projects; 15% is due to capital improvement projects construction; 18% is due to personal services (labor
contracts); 12% due to commodities, services & charges, and other). POLICY & ADMINISTRATION: 16% 2YR CHG:
(68% of the change is due to capital improvement projects; 12% for personal services (labor contracts); 5% for
services and charges; and 15% in capital outlayl.
Form 635.2A
REVENUES & OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
Taxes Levied on Property
Less: Uncollected Property Taxes-Levy Year
Net Current Property Taxes
Delinquent Proper~y Taxes
TIF Revenues
Other City Taxes
Licenses & Permits
U_se_of Money & Property .
Intergovernmental
Charges f_or Services
Sp~ecial Assessments
Miscellaneous
Sub-Total Reven~es
Other Financing Sources:
Transfers In
Proceeds of Debt
Proceeds of Fixed Asset Sales
Total Revenues & Other Sources
EXPENDITURES & OTHER FINANCING USES
Community Protection
(police,fire,street lighting, etc.)
Human DeveJopment
(health, library, recreation, etc.)
Home & Community Environment
(garbage, streets, utilities, etc.)
Policy & Administration
(m~eyor, council, clerk,.legal, etc.}
Non-Program
Total Expenditures
Less:
Debt Service
Capital Projects
Net Operating Expenditures
Transfers Out
Total Expenditures/Transfers Out
Excess Revenues & Other Sources Over
(Under) Expenditures/Transfers Out
Beginning Fund Balance July 1
Ending Fund Balance June 30
CITY OF IOWA CITY ADOPTED BUDGET SUMMARY
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
Special Debt Capital
General Revenues Service Projects
(A) (9) (C) {D)
77 15,584,229 106 3,030,228 134 3,119,507 161
78 107 135 162
79 15,584,229 108 3,03~1228 136 3,119,507 163
80 109 137 164
110 50,000
81 456,787 111 138 165
82 600,735 112
83
99state.xls
Expendable Budget
Trust Proprietary FY 1998/99
(E) (F) {G)
- 189
234 21,733,964
- 190
235
- 191 236 21,733
192 237
238 50,000
193 239 456,787
212
Re-estimated Actual
FY 1997/98 FY 1996/97
(HI {I)
;4 264 20,424,857 294 19,726,650
265 295
4 266 20,4~4,857 296 19,726,650
267 297
268 62,000 298 ~22
269 456,000 299 '0
270 543,200 300 4
271 3,361,203 301 ~ ~8
272 21,239,851 302 17 iO
273 __50,196,980 303 2E ;7
274 23,501 304 0
275 3,391,451 305 ~ 2
276 79,699,043 306
277 70,439,797 307 47,591,659
278 27,644,659 308 15,902,217
279 35,200 309 57,631
280 ~'77,818,699 310 36,963,610
281 12,046,496 311 10,270,835
282 13,767,756 312 7,787,381
283 90,425,522 313 64,428,215
284 6,041,432 314 5,500,810
428 _
285 122,281,206 315 87,987,241
286 10,241,079 316 9,146,037
287 57,951,143 317 28,649,820
288 54,088,984 318 50,191,384
289 69,837,266 319 48,126,434
290 192,118,472 3201136,113,675
291 (14,299,773 321 849,935
292 74,696,247 322 73,846,312
293 60,396,474 323 74,696,247
240 600,735
529,743 113 620,070 139 5,000 166 194 213 2,007,243 241 3,t62,056
84 i,956,552 114 9,737,359 140--- 17,~556 167 640,000- 167,239 426 1,9~2,545 242 14,461,251
85 2,685,101 _ 115 80,147 141 168 195 500 214 29,638,183 243 32,403,931
86 23,501 116 142 169 -- 427 244 23,501
87 1,340,463 117 96,400' 143 13,391 170 2,176,000 196 2~5 1,778,730 245 5,404,984
88 23,177,111 118 13,614,204 144 3,155,45~- 17~- 2,816,000 197 167,739 216 35,366,701 246
89 7,267,223 119 598,501 145 3,159,938 172 26,976,713 198 281,478 217 33,824,761 247 72,108,614
90 - 459 146 173 25,709,726 218 2~,424,500 248 46,134,226
91 1,330,700 147 174 199 219 249 1,330,70~-
92 31,775,034 120 14,212,705 148 6,315,392 175 55,502,439 200 449,217 220 89,615,962 250 197,87C
93 11,124,555 121 149 262,398 176 0 201 221 251 11,386,953
94 7,112,908 122 150 519,685 177 20,514,973 202 222 252
95 4,056,895 123 5,861,703 151 5,510,723 178 7,777,740 203 448,000 223 49,432,230 253 73,087
96 5,725,471 124 210,559 152 179 1,500,000 204 224 254 7,43~
97 28,019,829 125 6,072,262 153 6,292,806 180 29,792,713 205 448,000 225 49,432,230 255 120,057,840
98 4,000 126 - 154 6,292,806 181 226 7,178,628 256 13,475,434
99 O 127 182 29,792,713 - 227 24,344,518 257 54,137,231"
100 28,0~5,829 128 6,072,262 155 183 ' --206 448,000 22~- 17,909,084 258 52,445,175
101 2,448,909 129 8,809,093 156 375,000 184 25,709,726 207 229 _34,569,825 259 71,912,553'
102 30,468,738 130 14,881,355 157 6,667,806 185 55,502,439 208 4~8,O00 230 84,002,055 260 191,970,393
103 1,306,296 131 (668,650) 158 (352,414) 186 209 1,217 231 5,613,907 261 5,900,356
104 8,893,895 132 6,708,747 159 524,977 187 1,346,000 210 191 232 42,922,664 262 60,396,474
105 10,200,191 133 6,040,097 160 172,563 188 1,346,O00 211 1,408 233 48,536,571 263 66,296,830
Form 631.B
2/9/98 11:18 AM
REVENUES & OTHER~INANC!N~G SOURCES i
Taxes Levied on Property
Less:Uncollected Property Taxes-Levy Year :
Net Current Property Taxes (line 1 minus line 2)_
Delinquent Property Taxes _
TIF Revenues
Other City Taxes:
Mobile Home Taxes
Hotel/Motel Taxes _
Other Local Option Taxes $*
Subtotal - Other City Taxes (lines 6 thru 8 )
Licenses & Permits
Use of Money & Property
intergovernmental:
Federal Grants & Reimbursements
State Shared Revenues _
Other State Gr_ants & Reimburseme_nts
Local Grants & Reimbursements
Subtotal - Intergovernmental (lines 12 thru 15}
Charges for Services:
Water
Sewer
Erecttic
Gas
Parking
Airport . _
Landfill/Garbage
Hospital
Transit
Other
Subtotal - Charges for Services (lines 17 thru 26)
Sp. ecial Assessments
Miscellaneous
Other Financing Sources:
Operating Transfers In
Proceeds of Debt
Proceeds of Fixed Asset Sales
$ubtota~ - Other Financing Sources (lines 30 thru 32)
Tota~ Resources Except Begi_n_ning Fund Balance
(lines 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 16, 27, 29, 29, & 33)
General
(A)
1 15,584,2:~9
2
3 15,584,229
4
5
i 6
7 456,~87
8
9 456,787
10 600,735
11 529,743
12
13 1,154,077
14 324,714
15 477,761
16 1.956,552
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23 400
24
25
26 2,684~70~
27 2,685,101
28 23.501
29 1,340,463
30 7,267,223
31
32 1,330,700
33 8,597,923
31,775,034
35 8,893,895
Be~ginning Fund Balance J_~ly ~ _
TOTAL RESOURCES (lines 34 + 35) 36 40,668,929
*Enter the amount the city calculates to be attributable to property tax relief.
Special
Revenue
{B)
CiTY OF IOWA CiTY
RESOURCES DETAIL
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
Debt Capital Expendable
Service Projects Trust
(C) (D) (El
3,030,228 3,119,507
3,030,22~ 3,119,~07
50,000
620,070 5,000
5,457,185
4,215,174 17±556
65,000
9,737,359 17,556
64o,ooq
83,500
83,739
167,239
80,147
80,147
96,400 13,391 2,176,000
598,501 3,159,938 26,976,713
25,709,726
5OO
5OO
281,478
598,501 3,159,938 52,686,439 281,478
14,212,705 6,315,392 55,5~439 449,217
6,708,~747~_ 524,977 1,346,000 191
20,921,452 6,840,369 56,848,439 449,408
Proprietary
(F)
2,007,243
1,5o3,~1o
75,000
329,035
35,0o~o
1,942,545
8,658,000
11,455,000
2,620,154
5,970,500
673,900
260,629
29,638,183
1,778,73~0
33,824,761
20,424,500
54,249,261
89,615,962
42,922,664
132,538,626
Bud
FY 1
(G)
i
422[
423!
21
391
392
393
394
396
397
398
399
400
401
402:
403
404
405'~
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420 119
421 197
390
424 258
99state 1 .xls
get Re-estimated Actual
98/99 FY 1997/98 FY 1996/97
~) (H)
733,964 20,424,857 19,726,650 1
2
733,96~ 20,424,857 19,726,650 3
4
50,00~ 62,00~' -- 55,572
6
456,78~ ~56,000465,670 7
8
456,787 456,000 465,670 9
600,73~5 543,200 __ 624,614 ~1~0
162,056 3,361,203 4,412,528 11
600,6~- 13,137,315 7,220,195
461,807 5,602,899 8,079,431 1~3
802,2~- 1,959,974 1,280,535 14
596,50~0539,663 ~575,499 15
461,251 21,239,851 17,155,660 16
658,00~ 7,457,000 6,486,592 17
455,00~010,447,000 9,382,895
20
620,15~-__ 2,~64,~! 2,696,62~77 2~1
22
970.90~ 6,220,000' 6,011,139] 23
2¢
673,9b0 679,550 i 736,~1 25
025,977 2,929,1301 3,007,9~-I 26
403,93~- 30,196,980 28,~21~9871 27
23,501 23,501 106,59~00! 2~8
404,9~4 3,391,451 2,542,83~ 29
108,614 70,439,797 47,591,659 30
134,226 27,644,659 15,902,217 31
3~7~ 35,200 57,631
573,540 98,119,656 63,551,507 33
a70,7~9 177,818,699 I---136,963 6~!
396,474 74,696,247' ~3~,31~I 35
267,2~3 252,514,946~ 210,809,922~ 36
Form 631.A Page
A. COMMUNITY PROTECTION
Street Lighting
Police Department
Traffic Control and Safety
Jail
Civil Defense
Flood Control
Fire Department
Ambulance
Department of Inspections
Misce{laneous Protective Services
Debt Service
Capital Projects
TOTAL {lines 1-12)
B. HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Welfare Assistance
City Hospital
Payments to Private Hospitals
Health Regulation & Inspection
Water, Air & Mosquito Control
Community Mental Health
Other Social Services
Library Services
Museum, Sand, & Theater
Parks & Recreation Activities
Community Center, Zoo & Marina
Other Recreation and Culture
Animal Control
Debt Service
Capital Projects
TOTAL (lines 14-28)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
General
(A)
342,790
6,030,297
462,048
3,432,493
856,927
11,124,555
Special
Revenue
CITY OF IOWA CITY
REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
Debt Capital Expendable
Service Projects Trust
(C) (D) (E)
Proprietary
(F)
262,:398
262,398
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
3,197,471
3,098j~50
503,937
313,350
7,112,908
519,685
519,685
20,514,973
20,514,973
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
99state1
FY
let Re-estimated Actual
~8/99 FY 1997/98 FY 1996/97
~ IH) (I)
2,790 356,401 334,271 1
0,297 5,945,392 5,135,135 2
2,04~---404,871 -- 534,242 3
4
5
6
2,49~- 3,551,331 --3,2----06,232 7
8
6,927 -- 859,546 748,336 9
10
2,398 274,532 306,738 11
654,423 5,881 12
~953 12,046,496 10,270,835 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2O
7,471 3,022,893 3,087,724 21
22
8,150 3,229,583 2,718,661 23
24
3,937 552,391 471,160 25
3,350 286,224 263,741 26
9,685 548,685 777,398 27
4,973 6,127,980 468,697 28
7,566 13,767,756 7,787,381 29
Bud~
(G)
342
482
856
262
ll
5O3
31~
519
2O
28
C. HOME & COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT
Roads, Bridges, & Sidewalks
Snow Removal
Highway Engineering
Parking - Meter and Off-street
Sewers & Sewage Disposal
Landfill/Garbage
Street C~eaning
Water Utility
Electric Utility
Gas Utility
Cable TV
Transit
Airport
Cemetery
Community Beautification
Economic Development
Housing and Urban Renewal
Other Environmental Expenses
Debt Service
Capital Projects
TOTAL (lines 30-49)
D. POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION City Courts and Judicial
Mayor, Council, & City Manager
Clerk, Treasurer, and Finance Admin.
Elections
Legal Services & City Attorney
Planning & Zoning
City Hall & General Buildings
Other Administrative Expenses
Tort Liability
Debt Service
Capital Projects
TOTAL (lines 51-61)
Non-Program
Total Expenditures (lines 13 + 29 + 50 + 62
Transfers Out
Ending Fund Balance June 30
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS (lines 64 + 65 + 66)
Special Debt
General Revenue Service
(A) {B) (C)
30 1,815,030
31 146.951
32 935,485
33
34
35
36 41,525
37
38
39
40
41
42
43 221,295
44 535,259
45 320,966
46 5.738,258_
47 36,384 123,445
48 4,000
49
50 4,056,895 5,861,703
51
52 456,422
53 2,367,146
54
55 416,~52
56 545,749
57 302,997
58 1,270,405 210,559
59 366,700
6O
61
62 5,725,471 210,559
63
64 28,019,829 6,072,262
65 2,448.909 8,809,093
66 10,200,[91 6,040.097
67 40,668,929 20,921.452
CITY OF IOWA CITY
REQUIREMENTS SCHEDULE
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
Capital Expendable
Projects Trust
(D) (El
Proprietary
353
354
355
1,696,375 356
4,090.799 357
4,289,551 358
359
3.735,963 360
361
362
532.402 363
3.374.387 364
Budget
FY 1998/99
(G)
1,815,030
146,951
935,485
1,696.375
4,090,799
4.289,551
41,525
3,735,963
532,402
3,374.387
FY
9Sstatel .xls
imated Actual
~97/98 FY 1996/97
~) (I)
)17,930 1,415,882 30
125,363 246,541 31
)34.676 565,093 32
349,634 1,613.687 33
314,505 3,890,112 34
)85,222 3,699.827 35
54.713 136,636 36
Z20,142 3.238,900 37
38
39
517,809 513,346 40
387,438 5,379,808 41
213,325 168.054 42
218,662 201.065 43
574,223 472.468 44
$~-~899 6,253,881 46
5~..449 ~37,219 47
~-~.862 8,661,901 48,
)65.848 27.934,166 49,
~2~5.522 64.428,215 50
51
~46,226 419,280 52
~51,456 1,923,812 53
54
388.617 384,726 55
559,710 532,726 56
309,820 264,857 57
222,301 1,234,949 58
~60,410 499,384 59~
60;
~02,892 241,076 61
~41,432 5,500,81~ 62
63
281,206 87,987,241 64
~37,266 48,126,434 65
396,474 74.696,247 66
514,946 210,809,922 67
5,510,723
5,510,723
6,292,806
375,000
172,563
6,840.369
7,777,740
7,777,740
1,500,00~O
1,500,000
29.792,713
25,709,726
1,346,000
56,848,439
448,000
448,000
189,607 365
7.178,628
24,344,518
49.432,230
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
448,000 49,432.230 386
34,569,825 387
1,408 48,536,571 388
449,408 132,538,626 389
189,607
221,295
535.259
32O,966
5.738,258
6O7,829
12,693,351
32,122,258
73,O87,291
456,422
2,367,146
416,052
545,749
302,997
1,480,964
366,700
1,500,000
7,436,030
120,057,840
71,912.553
66,296,830
258,267,223
122
252
CITY OF IOWA CITY
SCHEDULE OF DIFFERENCES IN REVENUES BY FUND BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSED
THREE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN FY 99 - FY2001 TO THE FINAL PROPOSED THREE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN
AFTER CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS
RECEIPTS & TRANSFERS IN
FY99 BUDGET
Dec 97 Feb 98
Original Revised Change
FY2000 PROJECTED
Dec 97 Feb 96
Original Revised
Change
FY2001 PROJECTED
Dec 97 Feb 98
Original Revised Changel
1 GENERAL FUND 31,421,771 31,526,959 105,188 31,340,105 31,447,035 106,930
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
2 PARKING OPERATIONS 3,330,554 3,330,554
3 PARKING, RESERVES 1,306,760 1,306,760
4 WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATION 12,160,000 12,160,000
5 WASTEWATER RESERVES 7,796,782 7,796,762
6 WATER OPERATIONS 9,056,000 9,056,000
7 WATER RESERVES 1,800,720 1,800,720
8 REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS 1,946,000 1,946,000
9 LANDFILL OPERATIONS 3,420,000 3,420,000
10 LANDFILL RESERVES 3,029,323 3,029,323
11 AIRPORT OPERATIONS 226,493 226,493
12 TRANSIT OPERATIONS 3,341,922 3,390,183
13 TRANSIT RESERVES 40,500 40,500
14 BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS 595,629 595,629
15 BROADBAND TELECOM. RESERVES 12,500 12,500
TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 48,063,183 48,111,444
48,261
48,261
OTHER FUNDS
16 DEBT SERVICE 6,820,139 6,302,001 (518,138)
17 LIBRARY EQUIPMENT RESERVES 36,790 36,790
18 PARKLAND RESERVES
19 JCCOG 444,661 449,217 4,556
20 COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES 629,398 629,398
21 INFO. SVCS. COMPUTER REPL. RESRV. 202,750 202,750
22 POLICE COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 137,220 137,220
23 FIN/HUMAN RESOURCES SFTWP, RES. 35,000 35,000
24 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,253,000 1,253,000
25 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RESERVE 1,127,939 1,127,939
26 FIRE EQUIP REPLACEMENT RESERVE 23,114 23,114
27 CENTRAL SERVICES 778,250 778,250
28 ASSISTED HOUSING 4,259,655 4,259,655
29 ENERGY CONSERVATION
30 RISK MANAGEMENT LOSS RESERVE 929,679 758,344 (171,335)
31 HEALTH INSURANCE RESERVE 2,769,500 2,769,500
32 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 24,501 24,501
33 ROAD USE TAX 4,423,501 4,423,501
34 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,814,321 3,714,549 (99,772)
35 PUBLIC SAFETY RESERVE 150,000 150,000
36 CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT 1,550,000 1,550,000
37 RISE REPAYMENT FUND 13,391 13,391
38 VILLA GARDENS 50,000 50,000
TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 29,472,809 28,688,120 (784,689)
39 CAPITAL PROJECTS 84,051,177 97,006,957 12,955,780
GRAND TOTAL 193,008,940 205,333,480 12,324,540
G:\99BUD\STATE FORM S\3yr_recn.xls\RECEI PTS
3,805,554 3,805,554
1,455,309 1,455,309
13,130,700 13,130,700
7,281,164 7,281,164
10,432,000 10,432,000
1,650,560 1,650,560
1,946,000 1,946,000
3,420,000 3,420,000
2,859,323 2,859,323
238,993 238,993
3,530,356 3,578,749
110,000 110,000
605,508 605,508
13,500 13,500
50,478,967 50,527,360
7,334,350 7,433,793
36,790 36,790
470,773 474,534
561,405 561,405
202,750 202,750
137,220 137,220
35,000 35,000
1,265,000 1,265,000
1,118,939 1,118,939
23,808 23,808
782,550 782,550
4,262,655 4,262,655
1,216,942 969,095
2,795,670 2,795,670
24,501 24,501
4,423,501 4,423,501
4,071,656 4,025,386
125,000 125,000
1,550,000 1,550,000
13,391 13,391
48,393
48,393
99,443
3,761
(247,847)
(46,27O)
30,451,901 30,260,988 (190,913)
38,263,150 34,998,440 (3,264,710)
150,534,123 147,233,823 (3,300,300}
31,619,317 31,729,536 110,219
3,780,554 3,780,554
1,452,197 1,452,197
13,186,481 13,186,481
7,294,077 7,294,077
11,624,700 11,624,700
5,497,010 6,497,010
1,946,000 1,946,000
3,420,000 3,420,000
2,862,976 2,862,976
245,993 245,993
3,658,880 3,707,508 48,628
610,533 610,533
14,000 14,000
55,593,401 55,642,029 48,628
7,753,926 7,666,889 (87,037)
36,790 36,790
478,716 482,614 3,898
562,692 562,692
202,750 202,750
137,220 137,220
35,000 35,000
1,278,000 1,306,000 28,000
1,128,939 1,128,939
24,285 24,285
785,950 785,950
4,265,655 4,265,655
1,239,879 993,635 (246,244)
2,822,102 2,822,102
24,501 24,501
4,423,501 4,423,501
4,226,805 4,219,130 (7,675)
100,000 100,000
1,550,000 1,550,000
13,391 13,391
31,090,102 30,781,044 (309,058)
83,536,974 83,736,974 200,000
201,839,794 201,689,583 49,789
CITY OF IOWA CITY
SCHEDULE OF DIFFERENCES IN EXPENDITURES BY FUND BETWEEN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSED
THREE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN FY 99 - FY 200~1 TO THE FINAL PROPOSED THREE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN
AFTER CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS
EXPENSES & TRANSFERS OUT
FY99 BUDGET
Dec 97 Feb 98
Original Revised Change
Dec 97
Original
FY2000PROJECTED
Feb 98
Revised
Change
Dec 97
Original
FY2001 PROJECTED
Feb 98
Revised Change
1 GENERAL FUND 30,050,783 30,004,558 (46,225) 31,672,647 31,621,501 (51,146)
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
2 PARKING OPERATIONS 3,533,135 3,533,135 3,794,089 3,794,089
3 PARKING, RESERVES 1,480,595 1,480,595 1,270,532 1,270,532
4 WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATION 12,086,277 12,086,277 14,655,403 11,855,403 (3,000,000)
5 WASTEWATER RESERVES 6,228,436 6,228,436 7,226,473 7,226,473
6 WATER OPERATIONS 7,600,162 7,6001162 7,321,636 7,321,636
7 WATER RESERVES 832,360 832,360 1,173,460 1,173,460
8 REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS 1,925,120 1,925,120 2,007,557 2,007,557
9 LANDFILL OPERATIONS 3,714,642 3,714,642 3,510,461 3,510,461
10 LANDFILL RESERVES 399,588 887,727 488,139 403,385 416,592 13,207
11 AIRPORT OPERATIONS 240,954 240,954 238,748 238,748
12 TRANSIT OPERATIONS 3,341,987 3,341,987 3,570,356 3,570,356
13 TRANSIT RESERVES 40,500 40,500 110,000 110,000
14 BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS 567,233 577,642 10,409 584,000 595,424 11,424
15 BROADBAND TELECOM. RESERVES 8,000 6,000
TOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 41,998,989 42,497,537 498,548 45,866,100 42,890,731 (2,975,369)
OTHER FUNDS
16 DEBT SERVICE 6,973,719 6,654,415
17 LIBRARY EQUIPMENT RESERVES
18 PARKLAND RESERVES
19 JCCOG 444,633 448,000
20 COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES 632,611 632,611
21 INFO. SVCS. COMPUTER REPL. RESRV. 245,942 245,942
22 POLICE COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 59,258 258
23 FiN/HUMAN RESOURCES SFTVVR RES.
24 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1,223,033 1,241,698
25 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RESERVE 2,278,478 2,278,478
26 FIRE EQUIP REPLACEMENT RESERVE
27 CENTRAL SERVICES 723,584 723,584
28 ASSISTED HOUSING 4,187,775 4,187,775
29 ENERGY CONSERVATION
30 RISK MANAGEMENT LOSS RESERVE 1,141,145 1,141,145
31 HEALTH INSURANCE RESERVE 3,018,309 3,018,309
32 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 23,501 23,501
33 ROAD USE TAX 4,531,769 4,537,169
34 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,858,274 3,858,274
35 PUBLIC SAFETY RESERVE 575,209 575,209
36 CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT 1,549,058 1,549,058
37 RISE REPAYMENT FUND 13,391 13,391
38 VILLA GARDENS 50,425 50,425
TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 31,530,114 31,179,242
39 CAPITAL PROJECTS 84,051,177 97,006,957
GRAND TOTAL 187,631,063 200,688,294
(319,304)
3,367
(59,000)
18,665
5,400
(350,872)
12,955,780
13,057,231
7,496,840
470,668
561,405
127,242
164,260
1,271,338
2,116,311
763,439
4,239,292
1,170,084
3,046,484
23,501
4,549,898
4,733,430
585,211
1,549,713
13,391
32,882,507
38,263,150
148,684,404
32,214,383 32,162,316 (52,067)
3,822,126 3,822,126
1,565,074 1,565,074
14,603,358 11,767,358 {2,836,000)
7,217,621 7,217,621
14,064,778 14,064,778
3,267,235 3,267,235
2,032,529 2,032,529
3,502,843 3,502,843
304,643 317,783 13,140
245,727 245,727
3,618,880 3,618,880
596,854 608,512 11,658
54,841,668 52,030,466 (2,811,202)
7,307,902 (188,938) 7,662,339 7,540,064 (122,275)
474,068
561,405
127,242
164,260
1,290,190
2,116,311
763,439
4,239,292
1,170,084
3,046,484
23,501
4,502,728
4,733,430
585,211
1,549,713
13,391
3,400
18,852
(47,170)
(213,856)
(3,264,710)
(6,505,081)
32,668,651
34,998,440
142,179,323
478,660
562,692
44,894
262
1,288,979
935,413
861,274
4,253,870
1,193,790
3,074,940
23,501
4,827,603
4,209,144
585,213
1,550,148
13,391
31,566,113
83,536,974
202,159,138
462,094 3,434
562,692
44,894
262
1,308,020 19,041
935,413
861,274
4,253,870
1,193,790
3,074,940
23,501
4,639,203 (188,400)
4,209,144
585,213
1,550,148
13,391
31,277,913 (288,200)
80,830,749 (2,706,225)
196,301,444 (5,857,694)
G:\99BUD\STATE FORMS\3yr_recn.xls\EXPENSES
2/19/98 CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY99 - FY01 PROPOSED FINANCIAL PLAN
RECONCILIATION OF CITY MANAGER'S ORIGINAL PROPOSED TO CURRENT PROPOSED
AFTER CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS
FUND/REVENUE/EXPENDITURE DESCRIPTION
GENERAL FUND:
REVENUES:
Total per City Manager's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
Property taxes-based on final County Auditor's Valuation report
Contracts for Services - 28E Agreements
Sub total - General Fund Revenue Changes
Total Proposed General Fund Revenues
FY99 FY2000 FY2001
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
31,421,771 31,340,105 31,619,317
70,952 71,761 74,066
34,236 35,169 36,153
105,188 106,930 110,219
31,526,959 31,447,035 31,729,536
EXPENDITURES:
Total per City Manager's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
Personal Services:
Recreation - Recalculate Temporary Wages closer to past actuals
Animal Control - .44 FTE Kennel Asst added by City Council
Parks/Forestry Revision per Resolution to restructure
Sub total - Personal Services
Commodities, Services, & Charges:
Aid to Agencies - City Council recommendations Engineering - Professional Services revisions
Recreation - eliminated aid to agencies funding & other exp adj.
Sub total - Commodities, Services, & Chargebacks
Transfers Out:
Non-Op Admin Transit Levy - Auditor's Valuation adjustment
Non-Op Admin funding of CIP projects
Non-Op Admin JCCOG funding
Sub total - Transfer Out Changes
Sub total General Fund Expenditure Changes
Total Proposed General Fund Expenditures
30,050,783 31,672,647 32,214,383
(68,128) (75,007) (76,585)
13,993 15,180 15,471
5,628 6,258 6,400
(48,507) (53,569) (54,714)
6,290 6,290 6,290
(35) (70)
(5,000) (5,117) (5,237)
1,290 1,138 983
7,183 7,315 7,550
(1,000)
(5,191) (6,030) (5,886)
992 1,285 1,664
(46,225) (51,146) (52,067)
30,004,558 31,621,501 32,162,316
99bud~stforms\RECON99.XLS
2/19/98 CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY99 - FY0~I PROPOSED FINANCIAL PLAN
RECONCILIATION OF CITY MANAGER'S ORIGINAL PROPOSED TO CURRENT PROPOSED
AFTER CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS
FUND/REVENUE/EXPENDITURE DESCRIPTION
ENTERPRISE FUNDS:
REVENUES:
Total per City Manger's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
Transit Levy - adjusted per Auditor's valuation report
Transit state & federal grants - revised
Total Proposed Enterprise Fund Revenues
FY99 FY2000 FY2001
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
48,063,183 50,478,967 55,593,401
7,183 7,315 7,550
41,078 41,078 41,078
48,111,444 50,527,360 55,642,029
EXPENDITURES:
Total per city Manager's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
Landfill subsidy to JCCOG & ECICOG
Landfill CIP funding
Wastewater CIP funding from fund balance
Broadband Telecommunications - Cable TV Administrator to .75 FTE from .60 FTE
Sub total - Enterprise Fund Changes
Total Proposed Enterprise Fund Expenditures
41,998,989 45,866,100 54,841,668
12,901 13,207 13,140
475,238
(3,000,000) (2,836,000)
10,409 11,424 11,658
498,548 (2,975,369) (2,811,202)
42,497,537 42,890,731 52,030,466
OTHER FUNDS:
REVENUES:
Total per City Manger's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
Debt Service Property Taxes - Revised bond issue projections
Debt Service Property Taxes - Reduction for full credit funding
Debt Service Property Taxes - Transfer to fund "full credits" property tax reduction
JCCOG funding revisions: state, local, & federal
Equipment Division - revised chargebacks
Risk Management - eliminate extraordinary loss revenues
Risk Management - revised loss reserve contributions from other funds
Employee Benefits Property Taxes - reduced due to state "full credit" funding
Sub total - Other Fund Revenue Changes
TotaiProposed Other Fund Revenues
29,472,809 30,451,901 31,090,102
(518,138) 99,443 (87,037)
(25,000) (32,000) (87,000)
25,000 32,000 87,000
4,556 3,761 3,898
28,000
(150,000) (150,000) (150,000)
(21,335) (97,847) (96,244)
(99,772) (46,270) (7,675)
(784,689) (190,913) (309,058)
28,688,120 30,260,988 30,781,044
EXPENDITURES:
Total per City Manager's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
JCCOG: expense revisions
Debt Service: revised principal and interest payments
Information Services Police Computer Repl Fund - eliminate transfers to CIP
Equipment Division: revised insurance loss reserve payment
Road Use Tax: Revised CIP funding
Sub total - Other Fund Expenditure Changes
Total Proposed Other Fund Expenditures
GRAND TOTAL - OPERATING BUDGET
Total Operating Revenues after Adjustments
Total Operating Expenditures after Adjustments
31,530,114 32,882,507 31,566,113
3,367 3,400 3,434
(319,304) (188,938) (122,275)
(59,000)
18,665 18,852 19,041
5,400 (47,170) (188,400)
(350,872) (213,856) (288,200)
31,179,242 32,668,651 31,277,913
108,326,523 112,235,383
103,681,337 I 107,180,883
118,152,609
115,470,695
99bud\stforms\RECON99.XLS
2/19/98 CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY99 - FY01 PROPOSED FINANCIAL PLAN
RECONCILIATION OF CITY MANAGER'S ORIGINAL PROPOSED TO CURRENT PROPOSED
AFTER CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS
FUND/REVENUE/EXPENDITURE DESCRIPTION
'CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (ClP)
REVENUES:
Total per City Manger's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
Hwy 6 Median, Sidewalk & Drainage Imp.
Library-Carpeting from FY98
Hickory Hills Trail - added to FY 2000
Burlington St. Dam Safety
COPS Grant - Police Computer
Revisions to multi year plan
Bond Control Account Sale of Bonds (Sewer, Water, GO)
Sub total - CIP Revenue Changes
Total Proposed CIP Fund Revenues & Transfers in
EXPENDITURES:
Total per City Manger's Proposed Budget
Adjustments:
Hwy 6 Median, Sidewalk & Drainage Imp.
Library-Carpeting from FY98
COPS Grant - Police Computer
Burlington St. Dam Safety
Hickory Hills Trail
Sub total CIP Expenditures Changes
Total Proposed CIP Fund Expenditures
Bond Control Account transfers out (Sewer, Water, GO)
Total Proposed CIP Fund Expenditures & Bond Transfers
FY99 FY2000 FY2001
BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET
84,051,177
(900,000)
245,14o
13,610,640
12,955,780
97,006,957
54,692,091
(900,000)
245,140
(654,860)
54,037,231
42,969,726
97,006,957
38,263,150
100,000
104,000
164,000
(3,632,710)
(3,264,710)
34,998,440
21,428,714
164,000
104,000
100,000
368,000
21,796,714
13,201,726
34,998,440
83,536,974
200,000
200,000
83,736,974
43,223,536
43,223,536
37,607,213
80,830,749
GRAND TOTALS:
Revenues
Expenditures
205,333,480 147,233,823
200,688,294J 142,179,323
201,889,583
196,301,444
99bud~stforms\RECON99.XLS
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City Council
of Iowa City will hold a public hearing on the
24th day of February, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the City of Iowa City,
410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa,
regarding the intent to convey a vacated
twenty foot (20') wide portion of the former
Benton Street right-of-way between Riverside
Drive and the Iowa River which is adjacent to
Linder Tire Service to Henry and Grace Linder,
with the City retaining all utility easements.
Persons interested in expressing their views
concerning this matter, either verbally or in
writing, will be given the opportunity to be
heard at the above-mentioned time and place.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City Council
of Iowa City will hold a public hearing on the
24th day of February, 1998, at 7:00 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the City of Iowa City,
410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa,
regarding the intent to convey vacated portions
of the Waterfront Drive right-of-way located
north of Stevens Drive and adjacent to Country
Kitchen, Carlos O'Kelly's, Contractor's Tool
and Supply and Robo Car Wash to Rosalie
Braverman, Darrel L. and David K. Rolph,
Thomae/Brogan Partners and Blackhawk
Partners, as the owners of said properties,
respectively.
Persons interested in expressing their views
concerning this matter, either verbally or in
writing, will be given the opportunity to be
heard at the above-mentioned time and place.
MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK
sat ah\landuse\watrfr nt.nph
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT
AND ESTIMATED COST FOR
WILLOW CREEK INTERCEPTOR AND
LATERAL SEWERS PROJECT
IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY Of IOWA
CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER INTERESTED
PERSONS:
Public notice is hereby given that the City
Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, will conduct
a public hearing on plans, specifications, form of
contract and estimated cost for the construction of
Willow Creek Interceptor and Lateral Sewers
Project in said City at 7:00 p.m. on the 24th day of
February, 1998, said meeting to be held in the
Council Chambers in the Civic Center in said City.
Said plans, specifications, form of contract and
estimated cost are now on file in the office of the
City Clerk in the Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa,
and may be inspected by any interested persons.
Any interested persons may appear at said
meeting of the City Council for the purpose of
making objections to and comments concerning
said plans, specifications, contract or the cost of
making said improvement.
This notice is given by order of the City Council
of the City of Iowa City, Iowa and as provided by
law.
MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK
pweng~willlate.doc
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT
AND ESTIMATED COST FOR
WILLOW CREEK TRAIL, PHASE 1 PROJECT,
MORMON TREK TO GALWAY HILLS
IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER INTERESTED
PERSONS:
Public notice is hereby given that the City
Council of the City of Iowa City. Iowa, will con-
duct a public hearing on plans. specifications,
form of contract and estimated cost for the con-
struction of the Willow Creek Trail, Phase 1
Project, Mormon Trek to Galway Hills in said
City at 7:00 p.m. on the 24th day of February,
1998, said meeting to be held in the Council
Chambers in the Civic Center in said City.
Said plans, specifications, form of contract and
estimated cost are now on file in the office of the
City Clerk in the Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa,
and may be inspected by any interested persons.
Any interested persons may appear at said
meeting of the City Council for the purpose of
making objections to and comments concerning
said plans, specifications, contract or the cost of
making said improvement.
This notice is given by order of the City Coun-
cil of the City of Iowa City, Iowa and as provided
by law.
MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK
PH-1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT
AND ESTIMATED COST FOR
NAPOLEON PARK ENTRANCE AND
PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER INTERESTED
PERSONS:
Public nolJce is hereby given that the City Council
of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, will conduct a public
hearing on plans, specifications, form of contract
and esUmated cost for the construcUon of the
NAPOLEON PARK ENTRANCE AND PARKING
LOT IMPROVEMENTS Project in said City at 7;00
p.m. onthe 24th dayof February , 1998,
said meeting to be held in the Council Chambers in
the Civic Center in said City.
Said plans, specifications, form of contract and
estimated cost are now on file in the office of the
City Clerk in the Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa, and
may be inspected by any interested persons.
Any interested persons may appear at said
meeting of the City Council for the purpose of
making objections to and comments concerning
said plans, specifications, contract or the cost of
making said improvement.
This notice is given by order of the City Council of
the City of Iowa City, Iowa and as provided by law.
MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK
PH-1