Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-06-03 Public hearingNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearings will be held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m. on the 3rd day of June, 1997, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 410 E. Wash- ington Street, Iowa City, Iowa; at which hearings (~ Council will consider the following item: An ordinance amending Iowa O,,ity Ci~ Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled Zoning Article P, entitled "Fences and Hedges," to change the vision triangle requirements at intersections. 2. An ordinance amending Iowa City City Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning" Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zone; Regulations," to consider permitting projecting signs in the CB-5 and CB-10 zones. 3. An ordinance amending Iowa City City Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zones; Regulations," to permit portable signs in the CB-2, CB-5, and CB-10 zones. Copies of the proposed ordinance are on file for public examination in the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. Persons wishin.cI to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged to appear at the above-men- tioned time and place. MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK ppdadmin\6-3nph.doc Prepared by; John Yapp, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5247 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 6, ENTITLED "ZONING," ARTICLE P, ENTITLED "FENCES AND HEDGES," TO CHANGE THE VISION TRIANGLE REQUIREMENT AT INTERSECTIONS. WHEREAS, the vision triangle is currently measured the same for local, collector and arterial streets, with the leg of the triangle measured thirty feet (30') along the right-of-way lines from their point of intersection; and WHEREAS, the required vision triangle for local streets is excessive, and it is in the City's best interest to modify the required vision triangle for local streets; and WHEREAS, measuring the two legs of the triangle thirty feet (30') along the curb for local streets from the point two streets intersect provides for adequate lines of sight at intersections; and WHEREAS, vision triangles for collector and arterial streets will continue to be measured thirty feet (30') along the right-of-way lines from their point of intersection; and WHEREAS, no fence or hedge more than two feet in height above the curb level shall be located within the required vision triangle, to ensure that lines of sight are maintained at intersections; and WHEREAS, split-rail, open-weave, and wrought iron fences less than twenty percent (20%) solid are found to not restrict lines of sight, and shall be permitted within the required vision triangle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: SECTION I. AMENDMENT Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article P, entitled "Fences and Hedges," is hereby amended by repealing Section 2, Subsection C in its entirety, and adding thereto a new Section 2, Subsection C as follows: 14-6P-2 C. At street intersections, no fence or hedge shall be located within a triangular area, measured as follows: Ordinance No. Page 2 1. On local streets, no fence or hedge more than two feet (2') in height above the curb level shall be located within a triangular area, with the legs of the triangle measured thirty feet (30') along the curb from the point the curbs of the two streets intersect. 2. On collector and arterial streets, no fence or hedge more than two feet (2') in height above the curb level shall be located within a triangular area, with the legs of the triangle measured thirty feet (30') along the right-of way lines from their point of intersection. 3. Where a collector or arterial street intersects with a local street, no fence or hedge more than two feet (2') in height above the curb level shall be located within a triangular area, with the legs of the triangle measured thirty feet (30') along the curb of the local street and thirty feet (30') along the right-of-way of the collector or arterial street. 4. Split-rail, open weave, and wrought iron fences less than twenty percent (20%) solid are exempted from the vision triangle requirement. The solidity is the percent of the fence over a random area which is made up of solid, opaque material, and which does not allow light or air to pass through. SECTION II. FIEPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION Ill. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whdle or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconsti- tutional. Ordinance No. Page 3 SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordi- nance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of ,19~ MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK ppdadmin\visiores.doc v,s,o. / W~HEREAS, the vision triangle is ~currently measQr~ed the same for local, collector §r~d arterial streets, With the leg of the triangle me~§ured thirty feet (30')%along the right-of-way lin¢'s from their point of intOsection; and / WHER~-~S, the required vi triangle for local streets t~; excessive, and is in the City's best interest to'~odify the req~ vision triangle for local streets; ~md WHEREAS, ~easurin! two legs of the triangle thirty streets from the provides for ade( intersections; and WHEREAS, visk arterial streets will feet (30') along tt point of intersectk WHEREAS feet in height a within the re( lines of si wrought (20%) s, and sh triangl the curb for local streets intersect lines of sight at 'iangles for collector and n'u,e to be measured thirty lines from their fence or~.l~edge more than two the curb I~vel shall be located vision triangle, to ensure that maintained at ir~t, ersections; and split-rail, opt,n-weave, and fences less than ~venty percent are found to not restrict"[ines of sight, be permitted within the re~l,uired vision \ BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE CI- COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Iow'~ CITY, \ I. AMENDMENT Chapter 6, ei~itled Article P, entitled "Fences and Hedge(s," hereby amended by repealing Section ~, Subsection C in its entirety, and adding thereto ~k, new Section 2, Subsection C as follows: ~ 14-6 P-2 ~ C. At street intersections, no fence or hedge shall be located within a triangular area, measured as follows: ~~rdinance No. e2 1. On local streets, no fence or hedge more than two feet (2') in height above the curb level shall be located within a triangular area, with the legs ~,f the triangle measured thirty feet (,~') along the curb from the point the twO streets intersect. 2. On ~ollector and arterial streets, ¢ fence~r hedge more than two feet,~2') in height above the curb level sh¢'l be located '~vithin a triangular are, witth the legs 0~ the triangle measu thir y feet (30') ~1ong the right-ot lines from their int of intersec' 3, Where a lector or street intersects no fence or hedge feet (2') in height above level shall be located within ular area, with the legs of the t~ ~le measured thirty feet (30') from ~rb along the local street and t[ (30') from the right-of-way collector or arterial str~ 4. Split-rail, )en weave wrought iron fer less than percent (20%) are exem from the visior. requirement. ~n~.e solidity is /t~ percent of the fence\over a raCd¢ area which is made up b;f solid, /q~aque material, and which do~e~ not 'allow light or air to pass through. ~ N II. REPEALER. All ordinances a~d : ordinances in conflict with the prov~, sic of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. S~ ION Ill. SEVERABILITY. If any section, ~0rovision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity o! the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Ordnance No. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordi- nar~ce sJ~all be in effect after its final passage, approval~nd publication, as provided by law. /Passe~d and approved this day ~ ,19 . - MAYOR AT"EST: CITY C~ERK ~rney's ppdldmin\visiores.dc City of Iowa City ORAN Date: April 7, 1997 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Yapp, Associate Planner Doug Ripley, JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner Re: Vision Triangle Amendment At their October 9, 1996 meeting, the Board of Adjustment requested that the Commission consider amending the vision triangle requirement in the zoning code. This request stemmed from an application for a variance from the vision triangle requirement, for a fence which en- croaches approximately five feet into the vision triangle. The Board found that the fence did not inhibit lines of sight at the intersection, nor did the location of the fence pose a safety concern. The Board felt that the problem is not with the location of the fence, it is with the way the vision triangle is measured. Therefore, it is more appropriate to recommend changing the code than it is to grant a variance for a specific property. Section 14-6P-2C of the Zoning Code states "at street intersections, no fence or hedge more than two feet (2') in height above the curb level shall be located within a triangular area, two (2) of its sides thirty feet (3(:)') in length and measured along the right-of-way lines from the point of intersection." This definition makes no distinction between local, collector, and arterial streets, the width of the right-of-way, the posted speed limit, and whether or not the intersection is controlled by a stop sign, yield sign or traffic signal. Staff considered several options in re-defining the vision triangle. Safety, in the form of adequate sight distance and stopping distance, is the primary concern. Other concerns staff has include the complexity of the regulation and how well it is understood by the public, the ease of enforce- ment, and how equally the regulation treats residents on similar streets. In reviewing the City's current vision triangle regulations, staff compared the current requirements with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) standards for stopping distance and sight distance. When defining an appropriate vision triangle standard for the community, there are a number of variables that make it difficult to devise one solution that will fit every situation correctly. These variables include the speed of traffic, the width of street pavement and right-of-way, and how an intersection is controlled. Driver due caution is also an important issue. When entering an intersection, it is the driver's responsibility to yield or stop as necessary, and to adjust speed to avoid conflicts. The proposed vision triangle requirement will give drivers sufficient sight and stopping distance, provided the driver is exercising due caution and is following the rules of the road. Without this driver responsibility, no vision triangle will ensure there is sufficient lines of sight at intersections. Staff Recommendation: Vision Triangle Based on the Functional Use of the Street Staff's recommendation is to base the vision triangle on whether a street is classified as a local, collector, or arterial street. Staff recommends that for collector and arterial streets, the vision triangle be measured as it is now, with the legs of the triangle measured thirty feet (30') from the intersection of the right-of-way lines. Collector and arterial streets carry greater volumes and speeds of traffic than local streets, and are more likely to be widened over time. Collectors and arterials are also designed to carry more through traffic, while local street traffic is required to stop before entering the collector or arterial traffic stream. For local streets, staff recommends that the 2 legs of the triangle be measured along the curb instead of the right-of-way line. This will result in a vision triangle shape based on vision needs. Staff believes that it is appropriate to treat local streets differently than arterial and collector streets because of the lower volumes and speeds of traffic on local streets, the varying location of the right-of-way line in residential areas, and because local streets are less likely to be widened. Other Alternatives In addition to the recommended solution, staff consider the following alternatives: Alternative I: Current Definition. The current definition, with the legs of the triangle measuring thirty feet (30') from the intersection of the right-of-way lines, is very easy to understand. The weakness in this definition is that it makes no distinction between street classifications or right-of- way width. While a thirty foot (30') long triangle leg measured from the right-of-way line may be appropriate for a collector or arterial street, staff feels it is excessive for a local street. Alternative I1: Vision Triangle Based on the Traffic Control at the Intersection. This option bases the size of the vision triangle on the type of traffic control at the intersection. The assump- tion is that traffic coming to a stop at an intersection does not need as large of a vision triangle as traffic which is in motion. Under this option, staff recommends the leg of the vision triangle be measured thirty feet (30') along the curb if there is a stop sign or traffic signal, and thirty feet (30') from the intersection of right-of-way lines if there is a yield sign or no control whatsoever. This measurement would hold regardless of whether the street is an arterial, collector, or local street. Under this definition, the required triangle would change with every addition of a stop sign or traffic signal at the intersection. This option may also result in requests for unwarranted traffic control (such as stop signs) so that property owners could extend their fence line or hedge further toward the corner. Alternative Ill: Vision Triangle Based on the Speed Limit of the Street. This option bases the size of the vision triangle on the posted speed limits of the intersecting streets. Whether an intersection is controlled with a stop sign or traffic signal could also be taken into account. Although this method may custom fit the vision triangle to each situation, it would also be the most complex to implement, and would be confusing for residents. In addition, the posted speed limit does not necessarily reflect the actual speed of traffic. As with the option based on the type of traffic control, the required triangle would change with every speed limit change on the street. The Solidity of the Fence or Hedge The solidity of the fence is how much solid, opaque material there is on the fence along its length. The definition of solidity, for the purposes of this ordinance, is the percent of the fence, over a random area, which is made up of solid, opaque matter, and which does not allow light or air to pass through. A few codes from other cities permit fences up to 4 to 41/2 feet in height within the vision triangle as long as the solidity is no greater than 20% to 50%. For example, a 3 to 4 foot tall split-rail, open weave, or wrought iron fence with a solidity of 10% to 20% would not block lines of sight at the intersection. Staff recommends that split-rail, open-weave, or wrought iron fences, or hedges with an solidity of 20% or less be permitted within the required vision triangle, up to a height of 4 feet. 3 Vision Triangle at Alleys Staff also evaluated requiring a vision triangle at alleys. Alleys are generally 16 feet wide within a 20 foot right-of-way, and have a speed limit of 10 miles-per-hour. It is part of the current code that any fence or structure must be at least 2 feet from any public right-of-way, including alleys. Alleys are designed and intended as access roads for adjoining properties; they are not designed to carry through traffic. The design features of alleys, including the narrow road width and numerous access points combine to limit the speed at which drivers will travel. Staff calculated the stopping distance of a vehicle in an alley traveling 10 miles-per-hour using the minimum available sight distance, if a fence or hedge were within two feet of the alley and street right-of-way. Under current regulations, a pedestrian would have the minimum 2 to 2.5 second reaction time (based on AASHTO standards) to avoid a collision. It is staff's opinion that increasing the vision triangle for alleys is unnecessary, and the increased sight distance may invite higher speeds entering and exiting the alley, as well as more through traffic. Therefore, staff recommends there be no change in the regulations for fence and hedge locations for alleys. A diagram illustrating lines of sight under current standards is attached. Staff also reviewed accident locations from 1994 to present, to see if alleys accounted for a significant number of accidents. Less than 1% of reported accidents were related to alleys. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning" Article P "Fences and Hedges," be amended as follows: 14-6P-2 At street intersections, no fence or hedge shall be located within a triangular area, mea- sured as follows: On local streets, no fence or hedge more than two feet (2') in height above the curb level shall be located within a triangular area, with the leg of the triangle measured thirty feet (30') along the curb from the point two streets intersect. = On collector and arterial streets, no fence or hedge more than two feet (2') in height above the curb level shall be located within a triangular area, with the leg of the triangle measured thirty feet (30') along the right-of-way lines from their point of intersection. w Split-rail, open-weave, and wrought iron fences less than 20% solid are exempt- ed from the vision-triangle requirement. The solidity is the percent of the fence over a random area which is made up of solid, opaque material, and which does not allow light or air to pass through. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vision Triangle Alternatives Diagram. 2. Vision Triangle at Alley Diagram. ppdadmin\jy3-20.wp5 Approved by: Robert Miklo, Senior Planner Department of Planning and Community Development I ,J I I t I I I ! I LOCAL ~o '~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearings will be held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m. on the 3rd day of June, 1997, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 410 E. Wash- ington Street, Iowa City, Iowa; at which hearings the Council will consider the following item: 1. An ordinance amending Iowa City City Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning" Article P, entitled "Fences and Hedges," to change the vision triangle requirements at (~ intersections. "An ordinance amending Iowa City City Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning" Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zone; Regulations," to consider permitting projecting signs in the CB-5 and CB-10 zones. 3. An ordinance amending Iowa City City Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zones; Regulations," to permit portable signs in the CB-2, CB-5, and CB-10 zones. Copies of the proposed ordinance are on file for public examination in the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. Persons wishing to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged to appear at the above-men- tioned time and place. MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK ppdadmin\6-3nph.doc -I'e- I P~ ~U6C6' f I. $~c Prepared by: John Yapp, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5247 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAP- TER 6, ENTITLED "ZONING," ARTICLE O, ENTITLED "'SIGN, REGULATIONS," TO PERMIT PROJECTING SIGNS AS A PROVISIONAL SIGN IN THE CB-5, CENTRAL BUSINESS SUPPORT ZONE AND THE CB-10, CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE. WHEREAS, projecting signs have been prohibited in the CB-5, Central Business Sup- port zone, and the CB-10, Central Business District zone, since the 1970s; and WHEREAS, unregulated projecting signs may lead to businesses installing bigger, bright- er and more colorful signs in an attempt to overshadow adjacent signs and business; and WHEREAS, small, pedestrian oriented projecting signs will benefit both the business erecting the sign as well as the overall street- scape; and WHEREAS, projecting signs are appropriate in the pedestrian-oriented CB-10, Central Business District zone and the CB-5, Central Business Support zone; and WHEREAS, because projecting signs may have a substantial impact on the character of downtown Iowa City, design of projecting signs will be subject to Design Review Committee approval; and WHEREAS, projecting signs will have size and location restrictions placed on them to help ensure they remain unobtrusive and 'do not oreate visual clutter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: SECTION I. AMENDMENT Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article O, entitled "Sign Regula- tions," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zone; Regulations:", Subsection F, entitled "CB-5 and CB-10 Zones" is hereby amended to include the following additional paragraphs and subparts: 14-60-5F. CB-5 and CB-10 zones: 2. Provisional signs: e. One projecting sign per ground floor business, provided it does not exceed six (6) square feet per sign face, does not project more than five feet (5') out from the building wall, is not less than eight feet (8') or more than twelve feet (12') above grade, is not thicker than eight inches (8"), is not illuminat- ed, and provided the business does not have an awning sign or signs. Any projecting sign must be fixed to the building wall, or to a po~e which is mounted on the building, but may not be swinging or easily moved by wind. The sign face must be installed per- pendicular to the building wall. A business wishing to install a projecting sign must show proof of liability insur- ance, and must obtain Design Review Committee approval according to procedures and guidelines established by the Design Review Committee prior to obtaining a sign permit. f. Awning signs, provided the business does have a projecting sign. SECTION II. REPEALER. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provi- sions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION Ill. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconsti- tutional. SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordi- nance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of ,19 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK / ppdadrnin\prolord.wp5 Prepared by: John ~)p, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52 319-356-5247 ORDINANCE NO. IN DI~ ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE lZ~ 6, ENTITLED "ZONING," O, "SIGN, REGULATIONS," TO SIGNS AS A PROVISII SIGN E CB-5, CENTRAL THE CB-10, BUSINESS r ZONE. prohibited port zone, District zone WHE may lead to busi~ er and more col, overshadow ad WIlE projecting si! erecting th. scape; an. W~ in r :AS, projecting have been the CB-5, C{ Business Sup- d the CB- Central Business and projecting signs s installing bigger, bright- JI signs in an attempt to signs and business; and II, pedestrian oriented ~nefit both the business n as as the overall street- projectin igns are appropriate CB-10, Central Busi~/c~ District zone and ~e CB-5, Central Bus~ess Support zone; and % . J WHEREAS, because pr ~c: ~,g signs may ~ave a substantial impact on tb ~%character of /downtown Iowa City, design ¢ f r 'oj~cting signs / will be subject to Design Review ( )mmittee approval; and, WHEREAS, projecting signs will e size and location restrictions placed on them help ensure they remain unobtrusive and create visual clutter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY' CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY IOWA: SECTION I. AMENDMENT Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article O, entitled "Sign Regula- tions," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zone; Regulations:", Subsection F, entitled "CB-5 and CB-10 Zones" is hereby amended to include the following additional paragraphs and subparts: 14-60-5F. CB-5 and CB-10 zones: 2. Provisional signs: e. One projecting sign per ground level business, provided it does not exceed six (6) square feet per sign face, does not project more than five feet (5') out from the building wall, is not less than eight feet (8') or more than twelve feet (12') above grade, is not thicker than eight inches (8"), is not illuminat- ed, and provided the business does not have an awning sign or signs. Any projecting sign must be fixed to the building wall, or to a pole which is mounted on the building, but may not be swinging or easily moved by wind. The sign face must be installed p pendicular to the building wal A business wishing to install a pro ign must show proof of liabi insur- ce, and must obtain Des Review approval '.ording to and guidel established by Design Revie~ prior to ining a sigr f. Awnin the business does sign. SECTION II. REF All ordinances and parts of ordinance,, conflict with the provi- sions of this Ordi~ are hereby repealed. SECTION III. ILITY. If any section, provision or of Ordinance shall be adjudged to invalid or u~onstitutional, such adjudicati~ shall not affect~he validity of the Ordinan? ~; a whole or any s~¢tion, provision or part/her~ )f not adjudged inw~,d or unconsti- tutio, yfal. SEJ~TION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. ~This Ordi- nce shall be in effect after its final~assage, proval and publication, as provided b law. Passed and approved this ,19 . MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK " C(x,.~~°rney~s ~f~ ppdadmin\projord.wp5 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM Date: May 1, 1997 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Yapp, Associate Planner Re: Projecting Sign Regulations A projecting sign is defined as "a building sign extending more than one foot out from the wall of the building on which it is mounted." Projecting signs were prohibited following urban renewal in the early 1970s. As you can see from the photograph below taken in 1971, projecting signs can dominate the streetscape. If left unregulated, each projecting sign may block the view of neighbor- ing signs, causing each business to successively install bigger, brighter and more colorful signs in an attempt to overshadow adjacent signs. "NE corner of Clinton & Washington Streets, 1971 Since projecting signs have been prohibited for the last several years, the downtown area has benefited from a more park-like atmosphere, free from excessive signage blocking the view of building facades, other businesses, and the sky. This is especially the case in the pedestrian mall. The installation of the Uncommon Grounds projecting sign (which was permitted as a time and temperature sign) has opened a discussion of whether or not to allow more such signs in the downtown area. Although it is possible to have tasteful, well-placed projecting signs, it is also entirely possible for projecting signs to be installed which detract from neighboring businesses as well as the atmosphere of the downtown. If the downtown has benefited from the prohibition 2 against projecting signs, it may be wise to continue that policy. Staff proposes that projecting signs continue to be prohibited, to prevent the possibility of the signs creating visual clutter in the downtown area. If the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council choose to permit projecting signs, staff recommends they be subject to conditions to protect against their becoming physically and visually obtrusive. Staff suggests that to help ensure they remain pedestrian oriented, they should not extend further than five feet out from the face of the building, and no part of them should be farther than 12 feet above grade (no part shall be lower than eight feet above a public right-of- way due to clearance requirements). To prevent projecting signs from blocking the view of a neighboring business or building, and to encourage the pedestrian orientation of such signs, no sign face should be larger than six square feet in size per side. To minimize glare and obtrusiveness, staff recommends that no illumination be permitted for projectings. To help ensure that numerous projecting signs are not erected on buildings which have more than one business in them, only one sign per first floor business should be permitted. Staff also recommends that projecting signs be fixed, and not be permitted to swing. This will decrease the chance of a projecting sign falling or coming loose. The sign face should be perpendicular to the building, and should not be more than eight inches thick. Although the exact design of projecting signs cannot be regulated by the Zoning Code, signs projecting over the pedestrian mall are subject to Design Review Committee approval. Because projecting signs may have a substantial impact on the character of the downtown if they are permitted, staff recommends that any projecting sign in the CB-10 and CB-5 zones be subject to Design Review Committee approval. This will help ensure that the visual clutter often associated with projecting signs will be minimized, and that they complement, rather than detract from, the appearance of the surrounding area. ~" !!~'::':'ii!; !;?i','. :; ..'.:;' '. ,': ' ;i,~'~. ~'i.:','~ "~,'"'i ......~'! i" , ~;~,il,;!i, ,,, :~', ,, ',,, ,, .i.,. %: ;::;:: ;i' ~ .'.~;~"' .. '~,;;:: '.'.4' '; .... · .?; .:-., ....,.,.~::. ' .... ". ',1 ' ' 'f~ .':"' ;'*'. ' '"" "~i: ' .'" ' . . ;~, .,'.,.~ "i; .', ;'..-..'i .... ' ;':'5 ....... '~: , ' ' '1 i , ~' ... ~ , ~;? ~,':~ t.i'. ' :~i';";'¢,. ',,, ',.'.."!,".'. .,.,--~" ~f"' '-~~~~' ~" '. -- · :i",!&;; ' . ~',' ':~!!( ~';.,.. i.'. ,~' ,/' ~, . '.' · ? ~' ~';: ' '.... ,~. ~ :,~!~ :~I,.,,.:;,, ,,.~;';..:.:~',:!~:,.~:: ¥',.~.: ,' ..-., ..,.,(~., :- .,.,-., ;-~ I ~/;?'"'.~' .... ' ........;'"~-',--.' 7~'~. ,'*' ';'~J'l, · .,,~.~.~¢' ~ ', .'.;;~,~,~;~ 1 t~','" ~ ,,, ,~,,-,.., ,~ · .. I, . ,,~11J. , , Example of small, non-illuminated projecting sign in Healdsburg, CA Staff has submitted the information in this memorandum to the Downtown Association and Design Review Committee for their review and comment. The Downtown Association has recommended that projecting signs be permitted, with size and location restrictions similar to what staff has outlined. The Design Review Committee will be considering a formal recommendation at their April 28 meeting. Both groups have suggested that a business should be able to have either a projecting sign or an awning sign, but not both. This would be another way to minimize the potential visual clutter numerous projecting signs might create. Staff agrees that permitting a business to have either a projecting sign or an awning sign, but not both, is similar to other provisions within the sign regulations designed to limit the accumulation of signage. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that projecting signs continue to be prohibited. If projecting signs are permit- ted, staff recommends that Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article O, entitled "Sign Regula- tions" be amended to permit projecting signs as a provisional use in the CB-5 and CB-10 zones: 14-60-5F. CB-5 and CB-10 Zones: 2. Provisional Signs: One projecting sign per ground level business, provided it does not exceed six (6) square feet per sign face, does not project more than five feet (5') out from the building wall, is not less than eight feet (8') or more than twelve feet (12') above grade, is not thicker than eight inches (8"), and provided the business does not have an awning sign or signs. Any projecting sign must be fixed to the building wall, or to a pole which is mounted on the building, but may not be swinging or easily moved by wind. The sign face must be installed perpendicular to the building wall. A business wishing to install a projecting sign must show proof of liability insurance, and must obtain Design Review Committee approval according to procedures and guidelines established by the Design Review Committee prior to obtaining a sign per- mit. e. Awning signs, provided the business does not have a projecting sign. Approved by: Robert Miklo, Senior Planner ppdadmin~ojCgn,w~6 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearings will be held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m. on the 3rd day of June, 1997, in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 410 E. Wash- ington Street, Iowa City, Iowa; at which hearings the Council will consider the following item: 1. An ordinance amending Iowa City City Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning" Article P, entitled "Fences and Hedges," to change the vision triangle requirements at intersections. 2. An ordinance amending Iowa City City Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning" Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zone; Regulations," to consider permitting projecting signs in the CB-5 and CB-10 //~-----~zones. I 3..)An ordinance amending Iowa City City ',-.."Code Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zones; Regulations," to permit portable signs in the CB-2, CB-5, and CB-10 zones. Copies of the proposed ordinance are on file for public examination in the Office of the City Clerk, Civic Center, Iowa City, Iowa. Persons wishing to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged to appear at the above-men- tioned time and place. MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK ppdadmin\6-3nph. doc Prepared by: John Yapp, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, iA 52240; 319-356-5247 ORDINANCENO. ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 6, ENTITLED "ZONING," ARTICLE O, ENTITLED "SIGN REGULATIONS," TO PERMIT PORTABLE SIGNS AS A PROVISIONAL SIGN IN THE CB-2, CENTRAL BUSINESS SERVICE ZONE, CB-5, CENTRAL BUSINESS SUPPORT ZONE, AND THE CB-10, CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONE. WHEREAS, portable signs are found to be a pedestrian-oriented sign appropriate for the central business zones; and WHEREAS, portable signs, with limits on their size and location, will not be obtrusive in the central business zones; and WHEREAS, for public safety reasons, portable signs shall not be permitted to impede pedestrian traffic, shall be weighted to provide stability, and should be moved to inside the business when the business is ciosed; and WHEREAS, although portable signs are appropriate in the pedestrian-oriented central business zones, they are not appropriate for all commercial zones due to too much visual and physical clutter in areas not oriented toward pedestrian travel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA: SECTION I. AMENDMENT. Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning," Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "Signs Permitted by Zone; Regulations:", Subsections F and E, entitled "CB-5 and CB-10 Zones" and "CB-2 Zone," respectively, are hereby amended to include the following additional paragrapl~s and subparts: 14-60-5F. CB-5 and CB-10 Zones: 2. Provisional signs: (d) One non-illuminated portable sign per first floor exterior storefront, provided it is placed only on private property or within a designated sidewalk cafe area, does not block access to any doorway, is moved inside the business when the business is closed, and is weighted at the base to provide stability as approved by the building official or designee. 3. Dimensional requirements: (b) (6) Portable Sign (A) Maximum area of sign face: six square feet Ordinance No. Page 2 (B) Maximum height of sign: six feet above grade 3, 14-60-5E. CB-2 Zone 2. Provisional signs: (d) One non-illuminated portable sign per first floor exterior storefront, provided it is placed only on private property or a designated sidewalk cafe area, does not block access to any doorway, is moved inside when the business is closed ,and is weighted at the base to provide stability as approved by the building official or designee. 3. Dimensional requirements: (b) (7) Portable Sign (A) Maximum area of sign face: six square feet (B) Maximum height of sign: six feet above grade SECTION II. REPEALER, All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provi- sions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION Ill. SEVERABILITY. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconsti- tutional. SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordi- nance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this __ day of ,1997. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK / // City Att~n y's ppdadmin/portable.ord/~ co.~,.._ ~ V ~..~_.~_"~,~Z- Prepared by: John p, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washi/on Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5247 ORDINANCE NO. / / :DINANCE AMENDING/TITLE 6, ENTITLED "ZONING," 'LED "SIGN REGI ,BLE SIGNS A~ IN TI- CB-2, CEN'] ZONE, 3-5, ZONE, DISTRICT WHERE, a pedestrian- central busine,, lZ~, CHAPTER ARTICLE O, TO PERMIT A PROVISIONAL SIGN BUSINESS SERVICE BUSINESS SUPPORT CENTRAL BUSINESS signs are found to be nted sign appropriate for the zones; and WHEREAS/, ~ortable signs, with limits on their size and/Ioc~ion, will not be obtrusive in the central b/usines~zones; and WHERF_/AS, for~public safety reasons, portable si~ns..s. hall n~ be permitted to impede pedestria~f traffic, shal~be weighted to provide stability,/ and should bc~moved to inside the busines¢ when the busine~6s is closed; and WI~.EREA. S, although ~.ortable signs are appropriate in the pedestri~-oriented central business zones, they are not ~ppropriate for all com)/nercial zones due to too_ ~uch visual and phy/~ical clutter in areas not oi~ented toward peCestrian travel, / NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT O~,~A~INED BY T~IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY \OF IOWA ~ITY, IOWA: SECTION I AMENDMENT Cha15 er 6, / ,,',, . entitled Zoning, Article O, entitled \~Sign Regulations," Section 5, entitled "S~ns Permitted by Zone; Regulations:", Subsecti~gs F and E, entitled "CB-5 and CB-10 Zones" an~N "CB-2 Zone," respectively, are hereby amended to include the following additional paragraphs and subparts: ~... 14-60-5F. CB-5 and CB-10 Zones: 2. Provisional signs: (d) One non-illuminated portable sign per first floor exterior storefront, provided it is placed only on private property or within a designated sidewalk care area, does not block access to any doorway, is moved inside the business when the business is closed, and is weighted at the base to provide stability as approved by the building official or designee. Ordinance No. Page 2 3. Dimensional requirements: (b) (6) Portable Sign (A) Maximum area of sign face: six uare Maximum height of sign: six f, above and ordin, · ' of this repeale~ SE III. SE~ provision or shall be adjudged 1 60-5E. CB-2 Zone 2. ~rovisional signs: (d) ne non-illuminated p sign per first ~or exterior sto provided it is only on property or a desi sidewalk c~ area, does not block ;ess to an' doorway, is moved inside the bu is closed ,and is weighted to provide stability as approved building official or designee. 3. Dimensio~ uirements: (b) (7) Portal Sign (A) Maximu of sign face: six square feet (B) Maxir Iht of sign: six feet above grade II. :.ALER. All ordinances in conflict with the are hereby RABILITY. If any of the Ordinance be invalid or nal, such ad shall not the validity of the ante as a whole o any section, provision or I~art thereof not udged invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION IV. EFFECTIVE ~ATE. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, ~s provided by law. ~ Passed and approved this ~day of , 1997. ~, MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK ppdadmin/portable.ord/~ City~torney's ~),t~ic/~ City of iowa City ME,', IORAN Date: May 1, 1997 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Yapp, Associate Planner Re: Portable Sign Amendment A number of downtown businesses have made use of small portable signs for many years, to advertise menu items, specials, sales, and other changeable messages. Although portable signs are currently prohibited under the City's sign regulations, enforcement of them has generally occurred only if they blocked the public right-of-way. These signs are generally less than six square feet in size, contain a changeable message, are located near the entrance to a business, and are light enough in weight so they can be moved inside when the business is closed. These signs are generally located on private property, but recently have been found in the public right-of- way as well. Examples of portable signs can be found in front of Bremer's Clothing, Blimpies restaurant, and Bo James restaurant. These signs have generally not been a problem in the past, although recent complaints about portable signs impeding pedestrian traffic have been logged with the City. In the summer of 1995, a complaint was logged regarding a portable sign in the City Plaza which was within the public right-of-way. As a result of that complaint, the Housing and Inspection Services Department notified several downtown businesses that their portable signs were not permitted under the sign ordinance. Joe Murphy then submitted the attached letter requesting that the sign ordinance be amended to permit portable signs. Again, such signs have not been a problem until recently when some business owners have placed them within the public right-of- way, where they have impeded pedestrian traffic. City policy and regulations should be clarified regarding the use, size, and appropriate location of portable signs. Many cities have outlawed portable signs altogether, because of their potential to end up blocking the public right-of-way, and their tendency to be blown or knocked over. Staff feels, however, that they are appropriate for use in the pedestrian oriented CB-10, CB-5 and CB-2 zones. In staff's view, the limited use of portable signs is not objectionable, provided certain conditions are met. To help assure that portable signs do not become large and obtrusive, the sign face should be limited to a maximum of six feet above grade. To help assure that the portable signs remain pedestrian oriented, staff recommends that the sign face be limited to a maximum of six square feet in size. For comparison, the Bremer's sign is roughly five feet in height, and has a 30" x 24" sign face (5 square feet). Portable signs should be permitted only on private property or within a designated sidewalk cafe area, and should not block access to any doorway, so that public access is not impeded. Finally, to help ensure that the sign is not blown over, bumped over, or moved into the sidewalk or street, the signs shall be anchored or weighted to provide stability, and should be removed to inside the business when the business is closed. Staff recommends only one sign be permitted per first floor business, not one sign per business in the building. Allowing portable signs in all commercial zones or city-wide would risk too much visual and physical clutter in areas not oriented toward pedestrian travel. As with other signs, portable signs would require a sign permit. 2 The Downtown Association has agreed with staff's recommendation. The Design Review Committee is meeting on April 28 to formulate a recommendation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Title 14, Chapter 6, entitled "Zoning" Article O, entitled "Sign Regulations" be amended to allow portable signs as a provisional sign in the CB-2, CB-5, and CB-10 zones: 14-60-5F. CB-5 and CB-10 ZONES: Provisional Signs: d. One portable sign per first floor business, provided it is placed only on private property or a designated sidewalk cafe area, does not block access to any doorway, is moved inside the business when the busi- ness is closed, and is anchored at the base to provide stability as approved by the Building Official or designee. Dimensional Requirements: (6) Portable Sign: (A) Maximum area of sign face: six square feet (B) Maximum height of sign: six feet above grade 14-60-5E. CB-2 ZONE Provisional Signs: d. One portable sign per first floor business, provided it is placed only on private property or a designated sidewalk cafe area, does not block access to any doorway, is moved inside the business when the business is closed, and is anchored at the base to provide stability as approved by the Building Official or designee. Dimensional Requirements: (7) Portable Sign: (A) Maximum area of sign face: six square feet (B) Maximum height of sign: six feet above grade Attachments: Letter from Joe Murphy jw/signs.jy Approved by: Robert Miklo Senior Planner BREMERS To: Planning and Zoning This is a request for a reasonable change to the sign ordinance to allow us to continue to display a sign outside the front of our store and many others in downtown Iowa City. What we would like to have is amendment to allow a sign that we carry in and out each day to promote our store. These signs would not be allowed to impede traffic flow and would have to be under a certain size. We would like to meet with planning and zoning to discuss this and to help with the writing ~f the ordinance. Thank you f~r your assistance in this matter. Sincerely~ Bremers Mens St~re 120 E. Washington Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319-338-1142 City of iowa City EMORANDU Date: May 7, 1997 To: From: Re: Downtown Association Design Review Committee John Yapp, Associate Planner '~I Proposed Portable Sign, Projecting Sign, and Changeable Copy Sign Amendments At their May 1, 1997 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission made recommendations to the City Council regarding portable signs, projecting signs, and changeable copy signs (see summary below). The Commission deferred consideration of awning illumination, directing staff to do further research on the definitions of awnings and awning signs. The City Council will likely set a public hearing on the three sign code amendments for their June 3 meeting. Changeable Copy Signs The Commission recommended by a vote of 7-0 that their be no change to the definition of changeable copy signs. This is consistent with the recommendations made by the Downtown Association and the Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee recommended by a vote of 5-1 (Swan voting no) that there be no change to the definition of changeable copy signs. Projecting Signs The Commission recommended by a vote of 6-0 (Chait voting no) that projecting signs continue to be prohibited. The Design Review Committee also recommended by a vote of 5-1 (Swan voting no) that projecting signs continue to be prohibited. The Downtown Association recommended that projecting signs be permitted in the CB-10 and CB~5 zones with size and location restrictions placed on the signs. Portable Signs The Commission recommended by a vote of 6-1 signs be permitted in the CB~10, CB-5, and restrictions: (Supple voting no) that portable CB-2 zones, with the following One nonilluminated portable sign be permitted per first floor exterior storefront, provided it is placed only on private property or a designated sidewalk cafe area, does not block access to any doorway, is moved inside when the business is closed, and is weighted at the base to provide stability as approved by the building official or designee. The maximum area of the sign face shall be six square feet, and the maximum height of the sign shall be six feet above grade. The Downtown Association recommended that portable signs should be permitted with size and location restrictions similar to what staff has proposed. The Design Review Committee recommended by a vote of 5-1 (Woodson voting no), that portable signs be permitted with the restrictions outlined above, including the additional condition that the design of a portable sign should receive Design Review Committee approval prior to obtaining a sign permit. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATED COST FOR WYLDE GREEN SANITARY SEWER PROJECT IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER PERSONS IN- TERESTED: Public notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, will conduct a public hearing on plans, specifica- tions, form of contract and estimated cost for the construction of the Wylde Green Sanitary Sewer Project in said City at 7:00 p.m. on the 3rd day of June, 1997, said meeting to be held in the Council Chambers in the Civic Center in said City. Said plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated cost are now on file in the office of the City Clerk in the Civic Center in Iowa City, Iowa, and may be inspected by any persons interested. Any persons interested may appear at said meeting of the City Council for the purpose of making objections to said plans, specifications, contract or the cost of making said improve- ment. This notice is given by order of the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa and as provided by law. MARIAN K. KARR, CITY CLERK pweng/wyldegr.nph