HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-12-16 CorrespondenceDate: Mon, 8 Dec 1997 16:28:38 -0600 (CST)
From: "H. Hart" <hhart@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu>
To: council@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu
Subject: A Note of Thanks
I've been meaning to extend my thanks to all who had a part in making the
downtown shuttle available. It's a wonderful service, and I hope it can
be continued!
Holly Hart
411 N. Dubuque St
337-7341
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
December 10, 1997
To:
From:
City Clerk
Doug Ripley, JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner~[5~/
Re:
Removal of Bus Loading Zone in 100 Block of Clinton St.
As directed by Title 9, Chapter 1, Section 3B of the City Code, this is to advise the City Council of
the following action. Unless directed otherwise by the City Council, this action will occur on or
shortly after December 26, 1997.
Action
Pursuant to Section 9-1-3A(18) of the City Code, signage will be removed designating the bus
loading zone on the east side of Clinton Street, north of Washington Street. The commercial
loading zone will be returned to this portion of the street.
Comment
This action is being taken at the request of the Transit Division. The bus loading zone prevented
area businesses from receiving deliveries. The Transit shuttle will continue to stop in this area, but
will do so in the easternmost travel lane of S. Clinton St.
Im\mem\dr12-10,doc
December 5, 1997
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council
RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination - PAR~ING ~ORC~T
We, the undersigned members of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa
City, Iowa, do hereby certify the following named person(s) as
eligible for the position of Parking Enforcement Attendant.
Cary Spicher
IOWA CITY CIVIL
CO~ISSION. ,9
~~/~ael~nedy,
SERVICE
Chair
ATTEST:
Jan Karr, City Clerk
411) kA.S! %'I'.'%.SIIIN(;I'ON S'I'RI'21';T d, l()%%A ('IT','.
Melrose Avenue Neighborhood Association
629 Melrose Avenue, Iowa City, Iowa 52246
(319) 354-4171
December 13, 1997
Iowa City City Council
Civic Center
Iowa City, IA 52240
re. Melrose Reconstruction Project
Dear Council Members:
Like the rest of Iowa City, we are pleased that the Melrose Avenue Street Reconstruction Project
has been completed. Moreover, we believe the results were worth the construction headaches:
the street looks wonderful, and the crosswalk lights, wide shoulders and center turn lane
certainly afford greater safety for pedestrians, bikers and motorists.
However, now that we have had a chance to live with the new situation for a while, we have
become aware of a couple of areas that may not be working as intended:
1. West-bound commuters on Melrose seem to be experiencing delays during peak travel
periods.
2. The pedestrian light at Melrose Court across from the University field house appears to be
longer than is necessary to cross the street, thereby exacerbating the traffic flow problem.
We hope Council will consider directing staff to study these areas in order to find ways to
improve current conditions. As part of the process, we urge you to consult with representatives
of the University and University Hospitals, for a couple of reasons.
First, there is, of course, much traffic turning right at Hawkins Drive to reach the University's
many facilities located north of Melrose Avenue. In evaluating the right-turn problem, we
suggest that consideration be given to the following:
Determining the destination of right-turning traffic into the University. Doing so may point
the way for redirecting traffic. For example, vehicles whose destination is the new parking
ramp 4 along Melrose Avenue may be able to enter the Hospital complex via the South Grand
Avenue surface lot entrance next to the field house, thereby completely avoiding Mel rose.
Determining what effect curb cuts such as the one at the Pomeranz Pavilion surface lot onto
Hawkins Drive are having on the right-turning traffic at the Melrose intersection.
It is, of course, possible that the recently-begun Newton Road relocation will redirect some
traffic to that part of the Hospital complex, resulting in an overall reduction of vehicles on
Melrose Avenue. In this case, perhaps little would need to be done to the Hawkins Drive
intersection. A discussion with representatives at the University and Hospital about this point
may clarify the situation.
It is curious that the subject of a right-turn lane at the Hawkins Drive intersection did not come up
during the many conversations about the street reconstruction project. One would have thought
that the consultants, who did analyses of the 5 main intersections in the Melrose Avenue corridor,
would have suggested such a feature for the 2- and 3-lane options. Perhaps it was anticipated
that the center turn lane, coupled with the new traffic light at the intersection of Melrose and
page 2 of 2 Melrose Reconstruction Project
Koser, would obviate the need for a dedicated right tum lane at Hawkins. It may be that this
issue needs to be revisited.
A second problem complicates the issue. It appears that at least part of the problem at Hawkins
Drive is caused by a back-up of traffic going north on Hawkins. This is due to the fact that the
light at South Drive (opposite the stadium) is triggered by cars leaving parking ramps no. 2 and
no. 4. The frequent changing of this signal hampers the movement of north-bound traffic on
Hawkins, and this in turn blocks right-turning cars at the intersection.
In light of the significant gains realized by the street reconstruction, we are not discouraged by
what we have observed regarding peak-period traffic flow. We do, however, believe that
additional improvements are still possible, and we are willing to be involved in discussion about
ways of improving the current situation.
Truly yours,
Steering Committee
Melrose Avenue Neighborhood Association
cc: Jeff Davidson, Assistant Director, City & Transportation Planning,
Marcia Klingaman, Neighborhood Services Coordinator
Ann Rhodes, V.P. University Relations