HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-05-26 (B) Info PacketCITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
May 15, 1998
IP1
IP2
IP3
IP4
IP5
IP6
IP7
IP8
IP9
IP10
IPll
I'P12
IP13
IP14
IP15
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
City Council Meeting Schedule and Tentative Work Session Agendas
Use of City Streets, Plaza, and Public Grounds
Memorandum from City Manager: Pending Development Issues
Memorandum from City Attorney: Partial Litigation Update:
vs. Michael McNiel - Favorable Verdict
Memorandum from City Attorney: Vacation
Memorandum from Assistant City Attorney Mitchell: Brochures Regarding
Bicycle and Non-Motorized Vehicles Regulations
Memorandum from City Clerk: Council Summer Meeting Schedule
Memorandum from City Clerk: May 8 Work Session
Letter from Planning and Community Development Director: Iowa City
Rehabilitation and Health Care Center
Memorandum from Planning and Community Development Assistant Director to
Economic Development Coordinator: Downtown Angle Parking Areas
Memorandum from Planning and Community Development Assistant Director:
Railroad Interchange Relocation Project
Memorandum from Solid Waste Management Planner: Summary of May 11
Work Session Discussion; Proposed Landfill Ban of Corrugated
Cardboard, Multi-Family Recycling, and Curbside Recycling Changes
Memorandum from Community Development
Priorities for CDBG and HOME
Memorandum from Parks and Recreation Director:
Release: Dubuque Street Sidewalk Installation
City of Iowa City
Napoleon Park
Coordinator: Determining
USE OF CITY STREETS, PLAZA, AND PUBLIC GROUNDS
(all approved by City Manager)
CITY PLAZA
0 Kirk Stephan: Shamen Project selling of handcrafted items - summer 1998
0 Maggie Rustenbeck: ECKANKAR, Religion of the Light and Sound of God
distribution of literature - summer 1998
STREETS AND GROUNDS
0 Mark Ginsberg: musical and dramatic performances- summer 1998
May 15, 1998
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
May 12, 1998
City Council
City Manager
Pending Development Issues
An application submitted by Howard Winebrenner for a preliminary and final plat approval of
Lot 7 WB Development, a 1.78 acre, 3-lot commercial subdivision located at Maples Avenue
and Escort Lane.
An application submitted by S & J Development for a preliminary plat approval of Country
Club Estates - Phase 1, a 21-1ot residential subdivision located at the terminus of Phoenix
Drive.
An application submitted by The Place/Commercial Real Estate to vacate Second Avenue
Court, located between First Avenue and Second Avenue, north of Muscatine Avenue.
mgr\pend5-12.doc
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
May 15, 1998
City Council
Eleanor M. Dilkes, City Attorney
Partial Litigation Update:
City of Iowa City vs. Michael McNiel - Favorable Verdict
To facilitate the Southgate Avenue Extension Project the City condemned a 4,640 square foot
piece of the property located at 1949 Waterfront Drive owned by Michael McNiel (McNiel Auto
Body). On August 26, 1996 the Johnson County Compensation Commission (Sheriff's Jury)
awarded Mr. McNiel $48,000. At that time the City's appraised value was $23,000. The City
appealed and Mr. McNiel cross-appealed, claiming the award was not high enough.
David Brown of the Hayek, Hayek & Brown law firm was retained to represent the City in this
appeal. The appeal went to trial before a Johnson County District Court jury this week. Jeff
McClure, Project Engineer, sat with Mr. Brown at trial and testified as one of the City's
witnesses. At the time of trial, the City had three valuations ranging from $23,000 to $27,000. An
appraiser hired by Mr. McNiel valued the property at $30,000. Mr. McNiel asked the jury to
award him $70,000. On Thursday, the jury returned a verdict in the amount of $36,926.
We consider this verdict to be a success. The verdict requires Mr. McNiel to refund just in
excess of $11,000 to the City. Importantly, because the verdict was not in excess of the amount
awarded by the Sheriff's Jury, the City will not be required to pay the attorney's fees Mr. McNiel
incurred in prosecuting this appeal.
Mr. McNiel has 30 days to appeal.
I am grateful to both David Brown and Jeff McClure for their hard work on this case.
cc: Steve Atkins, City Manager
Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager
David Brown, Attorney at Law
Rick Fosse, City Engineer
Chuck Schmadeke, Public Works Director
Jeff McClure, Project Engineer
Marian Karr, City Clerk
elea nor\mem\ccS*14 doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 12, 1998
To: City Council
From: Eleanor M. Dilkes, City Attorney
Re: Vacation
I will be on vacation from Friday, May 22, 1998 through Friday, May 29, 1998. Sarah will be in
charge while I'm gone and will handle the City Council meeting on May 26th. Annie will know
how to reach me.
CC:
Steve Atkins
Dale Helling
Marian Karr
Sarah Holecek
Department Directors
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
The Honorable Mayor Ernest W. Lehman and Members of the City Council
Dennis Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney ~
May 11, 1998
Re:
Brochures Regarding Bicycle and Non-Motorized Vehicles Regulations
Attached please find a brochure describing Iowa City's bicycle and non-motorized vehicle
regulations. Copies of the brochure will be made available to the public through the Parks
and Recreation Department, the Library, and the University of Iowa. A special thanks should
go to Kay Irelan of the Engineering Department for drafting and designing the brochure.
If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at 356-5030.
Attachment
Cc: Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney
Steve Atkins, City Manager
Marian Karr, City Clerk
Terry Trueblood, Parks & Recreation Director
Susan Craig, Library Director
John Yapp, Urban Planner
Kay Irelan, Drafter
bicycle regulations
· Bicycles may be ridden on any street
within the City. However, bicyclists
must obey the same traffic laws as
motor vehicles. In addition, bicyclists
must stay as far to the right-hand side
of the road as possible, except when
making a left-hand turn, and must ride
single file. Reflectors are required on
all bicycles and headlights must be
used after dusk.
//
II
{.',,liege
Ihl~'li~lgl,,l~
,I
· Bicycles may not be ridden on side-
walks in the central downtown business
district. The "central downtown busi-
ness district" is the area bounded by
and including Capitol Street to the west,
Burlington Street to the south, Gilbert
Street to the east, and Jefferson Street
to the north.
· Bicycles may be ridden on sidewalks in
all other areas of town. However,
bicyclists riding on sidewalks must
yield the right-of-way to pedestrians
and otherwise ()perate the bicycle in a
caretiff anti prudent manner.
· Bicycles may not be ridden within the
City Plaza/pedestrian mall.
· Bicycles may not be ridden within
Chauncey Swan Park.
non-motorized vehicle
regulations
These regulations apply to roller skates,
in-line skates, skateboards, coasters, and
unicycles. These regulations do not
apply to bicycles (which have their own
regulations), wheelchairs, or baby
strollers. ~
Non-motorized vehicles may not be
ridden on sidewalks in the central
downtown business district or within
the City Plaza/pedestrian mall.
Non-motorized vehicles may be ridden
on sidewalks in all other areas of town.
However, persons riding non-motorized
vehicles on sidewalks must yield the
right-of-way to pedestrians and other-
wise operate the non-motorized vehicle
in a carefid anti prudent manner.
· Non-motorized vehicles may not be
ridden on arterial streets or streets with-
in the central downtown business district.
Non-motorized vehicles may be ridden
on non-arterial streets. However,
persons who use non-motorized vehicles
on non-arterial streets must obey all
traffic laws; stay as far to the right of the
street as possible except when making a
left-hand turn; operate the non-motor-
ized vehicle with the flow of traffic and
in a careful and prudent manner; and
wear reflective clothing or a reflective
device after dusk.
Non-motorized vehicles may not be
ridden in parking lots or parking ramps,
except where posted as a permitted
activity.
· Non-motorized vehicles may not be ridden
within Chauncy Swan Park.
bicycle
and
non-motorized
vehicle
regulations
(77')' fiF IOlrl
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 14, 1998
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Marian K. Karr, City Clerk
Revision #2
Re: Council Summer Meeting Schedule
At Council work sessions last week additions were made to the summer meeting schedule. The
revised schedule is outlined below.
JUNE
Monday, 15, Work Session
Tuesday, 16, Formal
Wednesday, 17, Special Work Session 9:00 - 11:00 a.m. (Police Issues)
JULY
Monday, 6, Special Work Session
Tuesday, 7, Special Formal
Wednesday, 8, Special Work Session - 4:00 p.m.
Monday, 27, Work Session
Tuesday, 28, Formal
(Joint meeting with
County/Coralville/School Board)
Johnson
AUGUST
Monday, 24, Work Session
Tuesday, 25, Formal
SEPTEMBER
Tuesday, 8, Special Work Session
Wednesday, 9, Special Formal
Monday, 21, Return to Regular Schedule
All meetings are set to begin at 7:00 p.m. unless noted. The above schedule is subject to
change by Council.
cc: Media
Cable TV
Maintenance
clerk\mem\ccsched doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
May 14, 1998
Mayor and City Council
Marian K. Karr, City Clerk
Council Work Session, May 8, 1998 - 7:10 p.m. in Council Chambers
Council: Lehman, Champion, Kubby, Norton, O'Donnell, Thornberry. Absent: Vanderhoef.
Staff:
Atkins, Karr, Franklin, Miklo, Yapp, Kugler, Davidson, Rockwell, Osborne.
Tape(s): Reel 98-65, all; Reel 98-66, Side 1.
PENINSULA PROJECT WORKSHOP PRESENTATION
Reel 98-65, Side 1
Planning and Community Development Director Franklin and Dover, Kohl, & Partners
consultants Victor Dover, Robed Gray and Suzanne Madison presented summary information
regarding Peninsula Project design. Franklin explained that Dover, Kohl & Partners will present
final design information in July, 1998.
Meeting adjourned: 9:00 p.m.
clerk/min/O508-ws.doc
April 22, 1998
Robert Downer
Meardon, Sueppel, Downer & Hayes
122 S. Linn St.
Iowa City, IA 52240-1830
Re:
Iowa City Rehabilitation and Health Care Center
Dear Bob:
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
I have spoken with Bruce Glasgow regarding the development and annexation of his property
between the Care Center and Iowa City's eastern corporate boundary. I have received no
formal response from my letter of January 21, 1998; however, we did speak on the phone. He
indicated that he was having MMS Consultants work on a development proposal for discussion.
Subsequently I spoke with Larry Schnittjer of MMS Consultants, who indicated that the firm has
worked on a proposal. However, I have not received anything to date from MMS or
Mr. Glasgow. I advised Steve Siglin during a recent phone conversation that it might be prudent
for the Care Center to work with Mr. Glasgow to move this along. Since the City does not do
involuntary annexations as a matter of policy, the annexation of Mr. Glasgow's property will
need to be done with his concurrence. It is difficult for me to anticipate when we will reach
agreement on zoning for his property and its annexation.
Assuming that the annexation of the intervening property is accomplished, the area of which the
Care Center is a part would be served by what we call the Scott Park trunk sewer. The Scott
Park trunk sewer is currently not programmed in our Capital Improvements Program. This trunk
sewer traverses property owned by two or three separate individuals. I would anticipate that we
would need at least one year for design and property acquisition, even if easements are
acquired through condemnation. This trunk sewer has not been a high priority for the City
Council, probably due in part to the annexation question. Therefore, I think it highly unlikely that
the sewer would be completed to meet the November, 1999 deadline.
We have evaluated another option to serve the Care Center, via a line which is currently in
place west of Scott Boulevard. However, there are capacity constraints within this line which
would deter us from approving this as an option.
I am sorry that I cannot give you more optimistic news and a speedy solution to the Care
Center's sewage treatment problems. Please let me know if there is any other information which
you require.
Sincerely,./
Ka'rin Franklin, Director , ~
Department of Planning & Community Devel,~~
cc: Bruce Glasgow
Chuck Schmadeke
City Manager
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY. IOWA }2240-11126 · ¢3 f9) ]~6-}000 · FAX (3}9) 3~6-.~009
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 13, 1998
To: David Schoon
From: Jeff Davidson
Re: Downtown Angle Parking Areas
Last fall we completed the conversion of downtown parallel parking areas to angle parking. This
was done on two blocks of Linn Street and one block of College Street, and resulted in a gain of
15 parking spaces. This conversion was completed by City crews in an effort to get the angle
parking areas installed before winter. Temporary asphalt islands were used to delineate the new
angle parking areas.
The City Council at their May 11 work session indicated they wish to make these areas
permanent with implementation of the downtown streetscape plan. Would you please indicate to
the design consultant that the permanent conversion of these areas to angle parking should be
undertaken consistent with the remainder of the downtown streetscape project. As you are
aware, the temporaw conversion of these areas to angle parking last fall was done somewhat
crudely since we were in a hurry to get it completed before the asphalt plant closed. The City
Council has indicated they would like the following refinements in the design of these areas:
1. Reduce the size and improve the corner radius of the end islands. Perhaps delete altogether
if consistent with the remainder of the downtown streetscape plan.
2. Improve overall aesthetics.
Joe Fowler and I would also appreciate if the design consultant would see if parking stall width
can be reduced in order to squeeze a few more angle parking spaces out of these three blocks.
It appears to us that these three blocks have wider parking stalls than other downtown angle
parking areas. BRW should design Linn and College Streets consistent with other angle parking
areas such as along Washington Street.
Joe Fowler and I will be happy to review any preliminary design work to ensure that BRW is
accomplishing what Council would like to see. Let me know if you have any questions.
cc: Joe Fowler
Bill Dolman
jw/mem/~d-angle.doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 15, 1998
To: City Council
From: Jeff Davidson, Asst. Director, Dept. of Planning & Community Development
Re: Railroad interchange relocation project
I continue to receive questions on when the railroad interchange relocation project will be
completed. This is the project to relocate the interchange between the Iowa Interstate
Railroad and the CRANDIC Railroad from south Iowa City to Iowa County. You will recall
that the City received a $1.1 million grant from the Iowa Department of Transportation last
year to complete this project, under the guise of reducing arterial street traffic congestion
and improving air quality.
This project is somewhat unusual in that it is being completed with grant funds procured
by the City, but is otherwise a privately implemented project. It is our understanding that
the railroads have completed or are near completing acquisition of the needed property and
design of the project, which will be located along the Iowa Interstate Railroad main line
between Homestead and South Amana. I received correspondence from the railroad last
week that the Iowa Department of Transportation is requiring a historic significance survey
of a railroad drainage structure which would be replaced as part of the project. It was
indicated that this assessment should take approximately 2 weeks to complete. I have also
been informed by a member of the Amana Colonies Land Use District that they are
currently considering a zoning-change which will be necessary for the new railroad
interchange in Iowa County.
As far as we know the railroads still intend to have the project completed this construction
season.
CC;
Steve Atkins
Karin Franklin
Chuck Schmadeke
Rick Fosse
jccdgadm\mem\railinte.doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 15, 1998
To: Iowa City City Council
From: Brad Neumann,"~Solid Waste Management Planner
Re:
Summary of May 11 work session discussion; proposed landfill ban of corrugated
cardboard, multi-family recycling, and curbside recycling changes
As directed by you Monday evening, I will continue to plan for implementation of the landfill ban
on corrugated cardboard by the year 2000. I will also continue to work toward the July 1999
implementation date for required recycling programs in multi-family dwellings. The multi-family
recycling collection program will include at a minimum corrugated cardboard, chip board,
newspaper, office paper, magazines, and junk mail. I will be assembling a committee to assist
in developing implementation strategies for both the landfill ban and the multi-family recycling
mandatory collection program.
Also per your direction, I have run some numbers on the amount of clear glass and metal cans
we are currently collecting at the curb compared to the amount of magazines/catalogs, mixed
paper, and junk mail that could potentially be collected at the curb. The numbers are as follows:
· Amount of clear glass currently being collected at the curb: 150 tons/year (1997)
· Amount of clear glass currently being landfilled by Iowa City residents: 119 tons/year (est)
Total amount of clear glass potentially in the residential waste stream: 269 tons/year (est)
· Amount of metal cans currently being collected at the curb: 85 tons/year (1997)
· Amount of metal cans currently being landfilled: 97 tons/year (est)
Total amount of metal cans potentially in the residential waste stream: 182 tons/year (est)
· Amount of magazines/catalogs currently in the residential waste stream 433 tons/year (est)
· Amount of mixed paper currently in the residential waste stream: 530 tons/year (est)
· Amount of office paper currently in the residential waste stream: 261 tons/year (est)
Total amount of paper products potentially collected at the curb: 1,224 tons/year (est)
Other items currently collected at the curb: (1997)
· Newsprint 990 tons/year
· ¢¢1 and ¢¢2 Plastics 88 tons/year
· Cardboard 275 tons/year
Let's plan to discuss these numbers at an upcoming informal work session, so you can make a
decision on any desired adjustments to the residential curbside recycling collection program.
Let me know when you would like to schedule this discussion. I can be reached at x5235.
CC;
Steve Atkins
Jeff Davidson
Chuck Schmadeke
Gerry Kaefring
Dave Elias
Karin Franklin
Im\mem\bn5-13 doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: May 15, 1998
To: City Manager and City Council
From: Maurice I. Head, Community Development Coordinator
Re: Determining Priorities for CDBG and HOME
Council discussed several issues at the May 11 work session that may require adjusting
priorities for allocating CDBG and HOME dollars. At this meeting, Council members suggested
revising a few criteria and/or adding some to be considered when evaluating these projects. In
response to this discussion, it is my understanding that Council would like to discuss with the
Housing and Community Development Commission (HCDC), in advance of the next CDBG and
HOME allocation process, the issues discussed at the work session and generally review the
overall process for the upcoming year. Staff has summarized these issues or questions with
some brief explanation of how the process may already address these concerns:
How can we credit projects that recycle the CDBG and HOME resources by paying the
funds back to the program?
The ranking sheet that is used by the HCDC to evaluate CDBG and HOME proposals
provides points for projects that reuse federal funds. These points are given on a sliding
scale (0-9 points) based on a 100 point system. Points are allocated to projects based
on their degree of repayment to the City. For example, projects that repay the principal
and interest (3%) can receive 9 points and projects that request a grant with no
repayment receive 0 points. This approach is balanced by allowing non-profit agencies
with limited ability to repay funds, to receive points for having human resources
(volunteers) and leveraging other financial resources (in-kind professional services). A
non-profit agency can receive up to 8 points in these two categories.
2. How can we set-aside additional funding for economic development projects?
With respect to "CITY STEPS", we set-aside about 16% of our CDBG budget for
economic development activities. This year the set-aside goal was $152,000. As you
know, only Torus Precision Optics will receive economic development funding of
$75,000 this year. This amount is below our set-aside goal. However, the other two
economic development projects did not rank high enough for consideration by the
HCDC. We also made special efforts this year to solicit more economic development
applications for CDBG funding. We will continue to solicit quality economic development
projects to meet our future set-aside goal in this category.
o
How can we give credit to projects that pay property taxes or make a payment in lieu of
property taxes?
Our current ranking sheet does not give points for projects that pay property taxes. This
criterion can be incorporated into the ranking sheet for the next CDBG and HOME
allocation process.
If there are additional issues or questions that you would like the HCDC to discuss, please let
me know at 356-5244.
cc: Housing and Community Development Commission
Im\mem\mh5-15doc
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
CITY OF IOWA CITY
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
City Manager
Parks & Recreation Director
May 13, 1998
Napoleon Park
As you know we have been attempting to construct a new parking
lot to accommodate the Girls Softball program. Their season
begins Monday, May 18. We think we will be okay as long as we
don't get a lot of rain between now and next Monday. However,
because of the extremely wet Spring we have had, the parking lot
will not be completed in its entirety. As of today, we believe
that a portion of the parking lot will be sufficiently completed
to accommodate approximately 150-160 cars. Additionally, on a
temporary basis, we will be able to accommodate another 25-30
cars on the south side of the new concrete road immediately
south of the parking lot. We can also utilize the entry into
the parking lot to park 10-15 cars along one side of the
driveway. In addition, there are a few areas we can squeeze
cars into on a temporary basis. Ideally, we need a parking lot
to accommodate from 240-280 cars. The current parking lot when
completed will accommodate 248 cars, with space available for an
additional 44 cars.
In order to help the parking situation we are contracting with
Simpson Security to direct traffic for at least the first two
weeks of the season.
One other potential problem about which you should be aware is
poor drainage on fields 7 and 8, which are the two northernmost
fields in the park. While they will be playable there may be
times that games will have to be cancelled on those two fields,
while the other six proceed on schedule. We believe this to be
a problem as a result of the sewer project and we will be
working on it to take corrective measures.
Once everything is completed it will be a fine youth softball
complex and even now it is a much better facility than has ever
been there in the past. If we run into any other significant
problems, we will keep you posted.
Lisa Handsaker
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
May 12,1998
PRESS RELEASE
Contact Person: Tim Randall
330-8102
Re: Dubuque Street Sidewalk Installation
Weather permitting, beginning on Thursday, May 14, 1998, northbound traffic on
Dubuque Street between Park Road and Kimball Road will be intermittently
reduced to one lane of traffic. The easterly lane of traffic will be affected in order
to facilitate the construction of a sidewalk along this section of Dubuque Street.
Construction will take place for approximately 2 weeks.
Motorists are encouraged to exercise caution will driving in this area and to be
aware that delays may occur.
410 EAST V¥-~SI'IIN(;TON STREET · IOgg A ('IT¥, IO~A"A .A2240-1826 · (31~)) 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-.500~
CITY COUNCIL
INFORMATION PACKET
Ms¥22,1998
I
IP1
IP2
I
IP3
IP4
IP5
IP6
IP7
IP8
IP9
IP10
IPll
IP12
IP13
IP14
IP15
IP16
MAY 26 WORK SESSION ITEMS
Memorandum from Airport Manager: Iowa Jet Service
Letter from City Manager to John Sladek (Iowa City Lodge No. 590):
Proposed Lease
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Letter from Mayor to County Mayors and Board of Supervisors: Local Option Sales Tax
Letter from City Manager to Joan Tiemeyer (Homebuilders Association): Building
Inspection Division
Letter from City Manager to Allan Stokes (Iowa Department of Natural Resources):
Transfer Facilities
Letter from Director of Housing Inspection Services: Customer Service Survey Feedback
Letter from Park & Recreation Director: Park Tour
Letter from Director Parking & Transit: Parking Ramp Usage
Letter from Community Development Coordinator: Iowa City Housing Market Analysis
(Housing Study)
Letter from Associate Planner: Neighborhood Compatibility Design Guidelines for Infill
Apartment Buildings
Letter from Senior Building Inspector to Mark Johnson: Fire Separation
Release: Memorial Day Holiday Schedule
Release: Paint and Household Battery Clean-Up Day
Release: Iowa City Landfill
Agenda: May 19 - Johnson County Board of Supervisors Meeting
Agenda: May 21 - Johnson County Board of Supervisors Meeting
Agenda for the 5/26/98 meeting of the Board of Supervisors.
Agenda for 5/27/98 joint ~neeting between smaller cities of Johnson County
and Board of Supervisors.
Iowa City Police Activity report, Taylor, Broadway, and Cross Park. A brief
summary of the activities which occurred between 5/22-25.
IOWA CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
1801 South Riverside Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52246
Office Phone (319) 356-5045
Memorandum
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Iowa City. City. Council
Ron O'Neil. Airloon Manager ~ ~,
May 12. 1998
Iowa Jet Services
As was explained in an earlier memo, Iowa Jet Services (IJS) is interested in basing a charter jet service in
Ic:¥a Ci .ty. Airport Commissioner Mark Anderson and I met with Robert Staib on April 21 '~ to decide on a
location for Mr. Staib's business. After looking at several locations, Mark put together a pma that was
acceptable to the Commission and IJS. If all the details can be worked out, IJS will be located in the
southeast corner of the area known as the North Commercial area.
This idea was discussed at the Council/Commission subeommi~cc on April 30th. US would be the first
tenant in the 54-acre development and would hopefully attract other aviation-related businesses. The
Science Center is also interested in locating directly west of IJS. IJS and the Science Center would be the
first block or "chunk" of property. The Commission is in the process of determining what the fair market
value rent should be.
IJS has requested the Airport provide the hard surfaced parking area south of their hangar and a taxiway
connecting their facility to the existing taxiway to Runway 17. Estimated cost for the two improvements is
$ 205,000. A temporary road from Ernest Street to IJS's office building would also need to be constructed.
A permanent road would be constructed when the infrastmcuge for the North Commercial area is
complete&
In addition, the issue of property taxes will n~ed to be resolve& Originally, IJS was going to build the
hangar and donate it to the Airport in exchange for a long-term lease. IJS was going to fund the building
with private funding. Now, because there may be money borrowed for the building donating the building
at the beginrang of the lease may not be possible.
The Commission has developed a land lease for IJS. The area has been surveyed and most of the details of
the lease have been discussed. IJS has a concern about the mobile home park east of the North Commercial
area. This property is scheduled to be acquired and the tenants relocated through the Land Acquisition and
Relocation project currently being conducted by ACSG. The land acquisition project is scheduled to be
completed by October of 1998.
The Commission subcommittee of Mascari and Anderson~ along with Assistant City Attorney Mitchell has
invested a lot of time trTing to bring IJS to the Airport. When in full operation, IJS anticipates employing
30 to 40 people.
IOWA CI~ AIRPORT PROJECT
IOWA C~. {O~N COUP. IOWA CMS MAS
0
_/
May 20,1998
Mr. John Sladek
Iowa City Lodge No. 590
Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks
637 Foster Road
Iowa City, IA 52245
CITY OF I0 I/VA CITY
Dear John:
We received your letter addressed to Mayor Lehman on Monday, May 11, unfortunately it was
not in time to have this matter placed on the agenda for that evening. We will be scheduling this
matter for Council discussion at their meeting of May 26 at which the Council can discuss the
specifics of the proposal. If all appears to be in order the Council would set a public hearing on
the proposed lease at their meeting on June 15 and hold the hearing and take action at their
next meeting on July 7. I am alerting you to this schedule in that it would appear the soonest the
Council could give this matter their formal consideration would be the meeting of July 7. The
public hearing is required in these circumstances. At the time the public hearing is set we will
need to put the proposed lease on file with the City Clerk and have a more definite description
of the area. As suggested at the meeting, Chuck Schmadeke can assist you with the
description.
It was also brought to my attention that an informal group of City commission members from the
Parks and Recreation Commission and the Riverfront Natural Areas Commission have been
convened in order to assist in the planning of the Peninsula parkland area. The golf driving
range will have a direct beadng on their planning efforts and to date it appears it may conflict
with their recommendations. I would assume representatives of these commissions and/or
planning committee would appear to express their concerns and interests to the City Council.
They have indicated such active uses as a driving range be discouraged on the lower Peninsula
area.
We will move this item through the legislative process as quickly as possible, but I also want you
to be aware of the other planning activities occurring which will likely have a bearing on whether
the Council might approve this request.
If you have any additional questions please feel free to call Eleanor, Chuck or me.
Sincerely,
S p~--~~ins
City Manager
cc: Eleanor Dilkes
Chuck Schmadeke
City Council
Tim Doherty
Im\ltr~sa,5-15.doc
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1126 · (319) 356-$000 · FAX (319) 356-5009
May 18,1998
Joe Bolkcom, Chair
County Board of Supervisors
913 S. Dubuque St.
PO Box 1350
Iowa City, IA 52240
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
Dear Joe:
As I am sure you are aware, the Iowa City City Council has been discussing the local option
sales tax. At our recent work session, we determined we would pursue a local option sales tax
and I have attached a copy of our draft ballot language. We will be working on this draft ballot
language over the next few weeks and may make amendments. Our resolution to call the
election will occur at a later date.
I wanted to let you know of our plans to proceed with this referendum. It is likely that we will
suggest an election date some time in March of 1999. We plan to work with our immediate
neighbors in considering planning joint projects, but we also wanted to give you and your
community sufficient lead time to consider your own ballot proposal. I have taken the liberty of
providing you with our current sales tax estimates. These will be analyzed further and revised
accordingly.
If you have additional questions, please feel free to call. I will do my best to keep you informed
of our progress.
Sincerely,
Ernest W. Lehman
Mayor
cc: City Council
index bc\ltrs\4-1SA.doc
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240-1526 · (319) 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-$009
Understanding the Local Option Sales Tax
Since there has been much discussion about a local option sales tax referendum, a review of
the mechanics of the tax is in order.
This is a county tax imposed by an ordinance of the board of supervisors. It is not a city tax
even though it is imposed in a city and the city gets a portion of the revenues. It is a county tax
because it is voted on county-wide and is restricted to the boundaries of a given county.
Notice of the election must be given 60 days before the vote, and a simple majority in each
jurisdiction is required for passage.
Even though the election is county-wide, the tax applies only to the cities and/or the rural county
where a majority vote is received. All cities that are contiguous to each other are treated as one
large incorporated area. A simple majority of those voting in the contiguous area is required for
passage and the entire area approves or disapproves the tax. If one city within the contiguous
area overwhelmingly defeats the measure but a majority is achieved in the area as a whole, all
jurisdictions within the area would impose the tax.
In Johnson County, the contiguous cities are Iowa City, Coralville, University Heights, North
Liberty, Hills, and Tiffin.
There are two methods for calling an election for the local option sales tax. The first is for the
board of supervisors to receive a petition signed by eligible voters in the county equal to five
percent of persons voting in the last state general election. The other, and most common
method, is for a motion to be adopted by the city or cities or unincorporated areas representing
at least half of the county's population. In Johnson County the only combination that is possible
is for the City of Iowa City to call for the vote.
The ballot must specify the type of tax (local option sales), the date it will be imposed, the
approximate amount of revenue to be used for property tax relief, a statement of specific
purposes for which the revenues will be used (other than property tax relief), and the amount of
the tax (up to but not greater than one percent). The amount of property tax relief may be a
percentage or a specific dollar amount or it may be zero. The statements of specific purposes
can be as general as for economic development or as specific as a certain dollar amount for a
specific project.
This tax is imposed on the same basis as the state sales tax. However, it is not imposed on:
sales of motor fuel used to propel vehicles subject to registration; room rentals subject to local
option hotel/motel tax; sales of equipment by the Department of Transportation; sales of natural
gas or electric energy subject to a city- or county-imposed franchise fee; sale of lottery tickets
and receipts from other games conducted by the state lottery; any property or service not
subject tostate sales tax.
The local sales tax is applied at point of delivery.
Assume that City A has the tax and City B doesn't. If a resident of City B buys a television in
City A and takes it home, the resident of City B pays the tax. However. if the resident from
City B has the television delivered, then the tax is not paid because the point of delivery is
City B. If a resident of City A buys something in City B and has it delivered, the tax is paid
because point of delivery is City A which has the tax.
The tax can only be imposed on the first day of a quarter (January 1, April 1, July 1, or
October 1 ).
Once the tax is in effect it cannot be repealed for one year. The tax can be repealed simply by a
motion of the governing jurisdiction. Unlike the vote, it can be repealed in just one jurisdiction
within a contiguous area.
The proceeds from the tax are distributed to the cities and the county (rural only), 75 percent
based on the jurisdiction's percentage of the county's population and 25 percent based on the
jurisdiction's percentage of the county's property tax dollars levied. The population data are
based on the most recent certified federal census or as modified by subsequent certifications by
the U.S. Bureau of the Census. Property tax data are based on the amount of property tax
dollars levied from July 1, 1982 through June 30, 1985.
Each year the Department of Revenue and Finance estimates the amount of sales tax that
each city and county will receive for the year and the amount for each quarter of that year.
The accompanying table shows the amount each jurisdiction would have received based on
sales tax projections for the fiscal year ending 1997, and assuming all jurisdictions in Johnson
County had passed the tax.
The formula distributes less tax to Iowa City and Coralville than actually generated in these
cities.
The above information in narrative was taken from a similar report by the Polk-Des Moines
Taxpayers Association.
mgrlsalestx2.doc
0% for property tax relief
Iowa City
Ballot Proposition
(April 13, 1998)
40% for capital improvements and/or capital improvement debt service including, but not
limited to, expenditures for a new addition to the public library, renovation of the existing public
library, construction of a new downtown center for the arts/entertainment, construction of streets
and public thoroughfares, bridges, storm sewer projects, public buildings, parks, and related
infrastructure.
25% for additional income to the Water System Fund.
10% for operating expenses for the library and downtown center for the arts/entertainment,
including maintenance, capital expenditures and reserves.
10% for operating expenses for public transit and paratransit.
10% for hiring additional police officers and/or firefighters and construction of public safety
facilities.
5% for Johnson County area human service agencies.
mgr/t3allo~r. doc
SCHEDULE OF ESTIMATED REVENUE FROM A 1% LOCAL OPTION SALES TAX
USING FISCAL YEAR 1997 RETAIL SALES TAX OF JOHNSON COUNTY
% Estimated % of
Population $ 1% Local
Taxable % Taxable Population 1990 1% Local Option
Sales - Sales to - 1990 Census to Option Sales Sales Tax
Community FY 97 Total Census Total Tax to Total
Coralville 173,199,801 19.1% 10,347 10.7% $ 832,793 9.7%
Hills 2,393,382 0.3% 662 0.7% $ 50,679 0.6%
Iowa City 677,731,470 74.7% 60,148 62.3% $ 4,952,632 57.5%
(1997 Spec Census)
Lone Tree 2,092,110 0.2% 979 1.0% $ 76,365 0.9%
North Liberty 19,013,057 2.1% 2,926 3.0% $ 220,765 2.6%
Oxford 3,336,501 0.4% 663 0.7% $ 50,906 0.6%
Shueyville Included below 223 0.2% $ 16,799 0.2%
Solon 7,319,685 0.8% 1,050 1.1% $ 81,488 0.9%
Swisher 5,489,810 0.6% 645 0.7% $ 50,019 0.6%
Tiffin 2,927,453 0.3% 460 0.5% $ 35,175 0.4%
University
Heights Included below 1,042 1.1% $ 79,456 0.9%
Other/
Unincorporated
Johnson
County 13,267,989 1.5% 17,384 18.0% $ 2,167,252 25.2%
Total 906,771,258 100.0% 96,529 100.0% $ 8,614,327 100.0%
Salesop.xls/1997 F. st Sales TAx Rev/4/1/98 Page 1
May 18,1998
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
Joan Tiemeyer
Homebuilders Association
325 E. Washington St.
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Joan:
Attached is a document that was presented by Mark Johnson to the Iowa City City Council on
Tuesday evening, May 12. At .that time Mr. Johnson, representing Johnson Builders, spoke to
the items in this document as well as raising a number of other questions concerning the
relationship, at least between his company and our Building Inspection Division. In that this
document alludes to issues that could well go beyond the personal commentary of Mr. Johnson,
notably the relationship of all builders to our inspectors, I wanted to direct this to your attention
and ask for comments.
Mr. Johnson spoke to the fact that he was a member of the legislative committee of the
Homebuilders Association, and thereby because of our recent collaborative efforts at code
review and other mutual concerns, I felt this matter should be directed to your attention.
I would appreciate your review and if you need any additional information I am sure you can feel
free to call Mr. Johnson and of course my office.
Thankyou.
Stephen J. Aktins
City Manager
CO:
City Council
Doug Boothroy
Im\ltAsaS-14.doc
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY, IOWA $2240-1826 · (319) 356-S000 · FAX (319) 356-$009
I I I
Building &
Workshop
Creating Harmony & Consistency Between
Builders & the City of Iowa City
1) Iowa City Building Process & How it affects building
1) Plan Review committee takes too long to review plans. Typically takes 5 to 10 days
and if you want to start early with a foundation peri. it, it will cost you an additional
$75.00. In addition, they typically miss many essential issues, descrepancies and
never call to discuss the plan in details on items in question. In addition, they need to
provide supported documentation on any disputed issues. Plan review should take 24
to 48 hours and the site & foundation plan approved in 24 hours max:
Adds anywhere from 8 to 10 days to building process at $50.00 per day
2) Energy audit should be done by City of Iowa City if they wish to enforce it like many
other towns & cities.
3)
Adds 1 to 3 days and can be done with no cost by City with a computer program
Utilities should be given the trust and professional courtesy to hook up temporary's on
4)
Adds from 1to 5 days in the building process
Rough in inspections should be held separately by the individual inspectors and upon
request should be pre-inspected on the frame before any mechanicals being installed
to insure initial frame acceptance.
Adds 2 to 4 days and many times more.
5)
Inspectors should respond to any failure in codes by listing the code violation, code
interpretation and remedies. These items should be supported in literature written by
the municipalities, United Building Codes Handbook for interpretation or any other
publications supporting the interpretation.
6)
City should bring out plan review document (plan) that were approved to insure any
modification to sb'ucture conforms to code and if any additional information or
documentation is necessary for approval.
7)
Prevents major delays at dosing and occupancy situation delays in 1 to 10 days.
Inspections & re-inspections need to be done in a prompt and efficient manner within
a 24 to 48 hour pedod of call in or writing, or automatic approval is granted.
8) Inspectors should not be making engineering calls not related to the building process.
These are just some of the items that effect our flow and cost us up to 30 days in the
construction process. This not only adds additional cost to the project but reduces the
possibil'fdes for a builder to s~_~_-~-s-__.~-'fully perform, complete projects timely and to take on
more projects. Our City should be providing business's with the greatest potential to
su___nneed within a reasonable pedod of time. Let's remove the barriers that have no
building or safety impact on the consumer but provides a positive building process for the
Builders of Iowa City.
2) Inconsistency of Upholding of Codes
1) Interpretations made by Iowa City will not be made in writing upon request or demand,
which causes lack of the trust relationship.
2) Notification in change of interpretation, enforcement of interpretation, and or codes is not
given to builders before violation.
3) No communication system is set up to inform, consult, or educate builders on City & Ubc
4) Interpretations not being held consistent with all builders.
5) No attempt to problem solve or modify to fit a code of classification.
6) The City tends to provide the strictest interpretation & classification vs. the most flexible
interpretation which is what the code is intended to provide.
7) The process within the levels of the building 8, safety does not create results or provide
answers but only barriers and more problems.
8) Their inconsistency causes unpredictability thus creating an inability to properly price
homes, increasing cost and reducing affordability.
2
May 19, 1998
Allan Stokes
iowa Department of Natural Resources
Environmental Protection Division
Des Moines, IA 50319
Dear Mr. Stokes:
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
As you may be aware, the City of Iowa City as operator of the Iowa City Landfill has been presented
with an issue of concern to our future operating/financial position, that being the construction of a
transfer station by N&N Sanitation. As I understand DNR pohcy, you do not require a permit of those
facilities that transfer garbage truck-to-truck, as opposed to dumping garbage on the ground first
before it is pushed into a transfer vehicle. To be candid, I question the DNR's position on not requiring
a permit for such truck-to-truck transfer facilities. It seems clear in the Iowa Administrative Code,
Chapter 567-100, that these facilities should require a permit. The Code specifically defines a
"transfer station" as "a fixed or mobile intermediate solid waste disposal facility for transferring loads
of solid waste, with or without reduction in volume, to another transportation unit." I do not understand
how this does not cover a truck-to-truck transfer facility.
Currently N&N Sanitation is a private waste hauling firm operating in Johnson County. This company,
or others supporting the company have constructed a ramp and purchased transfer trailers for the
intended purpose of transferring waste from truck-to-truck and transporting the waste out-of state. I
am concerned that these types of facilities could become qu:te appealing to other private haulers,
since it appears no environmental review or a permit from DNR is required. I am further concerned
that these facilities will not be regulated as to possible environmental impacts such as blowing litter at
outdoor ramp sites, noise, odor, contaminated surface water runoff, and loads sitting in uncovered
trailers for long periods of time before being transferred for final disposal substantially all the rules
and regulations that apply to landfill operations.
I would encourage the DNR Environmental Protection Divisior to enforce the regulations currently in
the State Code pertaining to the permitting of all types transfer facilities. The law makes us as landfill
operator responsible for the waste produced in our service area, but with non-permitted waste
transfer facilities being allowed to operate our landfill and the DNR will not be able to track the waste
leaving our service area. It simply disappears, along with the surcharge tax funds that the DNR and
the Iowa City Landfill use in waste reduction efforts. If you believe it to be helpful, we would direct our
concerns to the Environmental Protection Commission and/or State legislators to secure the authority
necessary for DNR to regulate such facilities. We believe it now exists, however, further clarification
may be desirable.
If you need additional information or any expansion of our el.~boration, concerns, etc, please let me
know. .'
Sincerely,
Steph f: ,~. Atkin~'/
City Manager
cc: City Council
Im~ltr~bnS-13.doc
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY. IOWA $2240-1826 · (319) 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-$009
Date:
To:
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
City Council
From: Douglas Boothroy, Director of Housing Inspection Services
Re: Customer Service Survey Feedback
I have enclosed in the Council packet comments received from the customer service card '%ell
Us How We Are Doing." If you will recall, the Department of Housing Inspection Services began
distributing in January customer service cards to encourage customer feedback about quality of
inspection services provided by both the Building and Housing Inspection divisions. These cards
have been made available at the permit counter, and inspectors hand them out during
inspections. We have received 45 comments out of approximately 325 cards distributed.
Obviously, I am very pleased about the positive nature of these comments and have shared
them with my staff.
Enclosure
jw/mem/db-sun,,y.doc
Iowa City Housing and Inspection Services
Customer Service Survey
I'E LL IJCJ FlOW WE AR'£ POINt:
"Norm was exceptionally polite, and made us feel comfortable. His inspection was exacting and
he pointed out what could become a problematic area in future. Therefore I am working on
preventive measures. I would rate him superior in tact and approach. A pleasure to have here."
"Rental housing inspector, Norm Cate, was prompt, courteous, and efficient."
"1 appreciated the patience of Gary Klinefelter that it took such a long time to comply with
regulations in order to get the rental permit. I might add that if this house had been checked for
violations before purchase I would never have paid what I did for it, as it cost over $3,000.00 to
bring it up to code!"
"Both of my mother's properties were up for rental application renewal last month. Mr. Art
Anderson included the two inspections. I found him to be very personable and extremely helpful.
He provided a rationale for various ordinances and was very accommodating with scheduling
the appointments. He represents your department wonderfully."
"We enjoy working with Pat and his positive attitude towards his job. He has been a breath of
fresh air to a job that was taking a negative approach to our work. Again we commend him on a
job well done."
"Pat Hansen has been a very welcome addition to the building department. His knowledge of
the trade combined with his excellent people skills are top notch. We look forward to working
with Pat in the future."
"We are very pleased with the work Bernie Osvald and Julie Tallmen did on the Mondos
situation. They went above and beyond, and obviously were very polite and professional. We
sincerely appreciate that their efforts resolved the problem. Thank you."
"GREAT"
"I'm a first year landlord, and have a lot of questions. Bovey and Klinefelter have been helpful
and easy to work with as I go about fixing up the properties I manage. Thanks."
"Contrary to previous year's inspections, Mr. Bovey's inspection was a 'good' experience -
courteous and not 'nit picking'."
"Julie Ta'llman did an excellent job in advising us how to draw up our sensitive areas site plan,
was expeditious in routing it through the various departments and always had a smile on her
face. I appreciated everyone's cooperation."
"Our company thinks you are doing an excellent job. We deal with other City departments and
yours is definitely the most organized, efficient, and easy to deal with. We have no complaints.
Keep up the good work."
"Mr. Anderson was very nice and courteous. However, he cited things that I had in my house for
35 years, and no inspector had mentioned it before. Looks like you're just trying to make work to
keep inspectors busy."
hisadm/comrnents.doc 1
"John Bovey inspected our building. He was prompt, courteous, and professional."
"Your staff, headed by Mr. Klinefelter has always treated my firm and staff courteously and in a
professional fashion. It is Gary's office who has been most patient with our organization when
we miss an appointment or request an extension of a deadline. However, like all bureaucracies,
I believe your liberal government philosophies and office has grown out of control and out of
bounds."
"Gary Klinefelter was very professional, thorough, and helpful. He answered all our questions
and provided what assistance he could so we could come into compliance. As we are out-of-
state, he was very patient in allowing us the necessary time to comply. It was pleasure working
with him."
"1 am pleased I.C. checks rental prop. I am concerned why someone like me who maintains
everything constantly, paints, new refrig., countertops, and furnace every year, etc. gets written
up for a leaky faucet and dryer that was disconnected. (This prop. never ever had a dryer
before.) I am comparing this to the filthy fire trap, roach-ridden dilapidated places with no
washer and dryer. I could go on forever, rental places I had to visit when I worked with VNA and
made RN home visits. We were the ones who had to report and try to improve their conditions.
Whey does the city allow these places to exist year after year. Are they checked? Underground
massage parlors. Thank you for sending this. It is the first time I received a questionnaire."
"You do a wonderful job. Very accommodating and clear with requests."
"Great job. Good suggestions. Helpful. Understanding when extensions are requested."
"John always does a thorough job, is informative and friendly. No problems."
"1 believe you folks are very professional when dealing with owners. I just wish a few of the
really 'dumpy' places could be brought into compliance. Any chances of that happening? If you
want, I could show them to you all. Thanks for this opportunity!"
"Quite frankly - glad you asked. For one thing I feel the 'City' is getting or trying to get into the
rental 'business' and even more upsetting using tax payers money and the Fed funds that
maybe could be used by the private property owner without the 'City' placing as many
restrictions and governing the rental or private property for a certain time period. That should, in
my opinion, be 'none of the City's business.' Also, even though I could purchase more rental
property would not even consider it here in this city. Just mainly because of the ridiculous -
expensive required 3 year inspections. Just another way for the City to get a little more income
- i.e. the house we have owned and had inspected since 1969 and we keep it very good
condition - the inspector never fails to firld something to write up. Don't even try to tell me they
are not trained and maybe required to write up something when my house 1131 4th was
inspected. - couldn't find anything wrong so, noticed the tenant a very mature middle aged lady
had 'purposely' removed her electric dryer vent so the warm air would help warm the basement
and she:puts it back on in Summer. I and she feel that is really Ilone of your business and you
may be invading some personal area privacy. If she isn't bothered by the very small amount of
lint coming from the vent even though dryers have lint catchers then why should the City care.
Doubt there would ever be enough lint to cause fire as Art - inspector - mentioned. When I
asked about a City requirement regarding the dryer and asked for a copy he stated 'oh, there
isn't such a thing.' Well then that in itself tells me the inspectors are just 'searching' for
something. If there isn't such a requirement then why is it written up on my inspection? Another
'beef' I have is that why is there a need to inspect rental property every 3 yrs. I feel if a good
inspection is made and problems immediately taken care of and property owned by responsible
people - you know who they are by your records - then every 5 or 10 years should be sufficient.
When nothing could be found at my rental house - then as mentioned - the dryer vent was
written up and the need for guard rail on basement stairs. - we've owned this house
and rented it and had it always inspected since 10-69. Why all of a sudden this was required.
Are new requirements put on the books regularly? I feel all rental property owners should be
given a copy of all requirements and thing inspectors are instructed to check for. The $60+ fee
for the permit should cover this plus the % hr. or less the inspector does his job. Not sure if you
are the proper person to talk to about this. However, 'one of the City's low income rental
properties' is next to my rental home at 923 N. Dodge. I was surprised to see the City had put
up 1 section of chain link fence between my lot and 'the City's'. I wonder why. The family that
was there told me it was to keep the rowdy neighborhood kids out of the ravine. I must tell you I
had nothing but problems with those kids cutting between my hedge, making trail to my
backyard - making tree house in my backyard. Was a bad situation. Thank most of those kids in
the 900 block have moved but I would not have lived in my house myself let alone expect to rent
it to anyone. I was just wondering why you don't run the chain link up to the sidewalk in an effort
to avoid your low income tenants or any tenants cutting through my hedge and lawn and
thinking they have a right to be in my yard. The lot line marker is near my hedge by the walk. To
sum things up - I just feel you 'the City' should concentrate more on the 'big' landlords. The
ones who do try to buy up lots property and rent almost anything! I'd appreciate it if you could
share this with others, i.e., Council - City Manager. Thank you in advance for just listening to
me."
"Each inspector I have had (3 total), has been very friendly, very detailed in each step of our
rental inspection. They have pointed out several problems, given ample time to correct any
problems and been very fair. My inspectors have been John Bovey, Gary Klinefelter, and
Art Anderson."
"Everyone does okay - we do not have any problems. Everyone worked with us when we have
any problems, questions, or concerns."
"Thank you very much for all your work concerning this grill in downtown Iowa City. We so
appreciate that our office will return to a comfortable place to spend the day. We appreciate
your helpful attitude."
"1 think all the housing inspection departments do a great job. They are easy to work with, timely
and I have received a lot of information and assistance. Thank you!"
"Julie Tallman responded to my phone inquiry on City ordinances pertaining to landfill with a site
visit. She was prompt, courteous, informed and helpful. She was not dogmatic and bureaucratic.
I may not agree with the ordinances, but her presentation made them more palatable."
"Julie Tallman has provided the Rochester Hills Condominium Association with very
professional, factual, and educational service. We are delighted that the City has provided her
with help in untangling the source and extent of our erosion problems. Julie's ability to handle
information and problems in public meetings is just outstanding."
"Prompt, friendly, interested, willing to answer questions. Explained when done. John Bovey
gets an 'A'."
"Norm Cate was very pleasant and professional to work with on our rental property and 613 E,
College. We know going into the inspections that there would be improvements and he was very
thorough."
"Good job of inspection."
"Westwinds Management has always felt I.C. Housing and Inspection has done an excellent
job. Joan, Art, Gary, Steve, etc. have been easy to work with, are fair and we feel perform an
essential service to the city."
hi~adm/comments.doc 3
"All inspectors that I have dealt with in the past few years have been pleasant, while doing a
sometimes unpleasant job. I think the inspection process is very important, because I have lived
in rental housing where there was no minimum standard of livability. There does seem to be
some inconsistency between items cited. Fire and electrical safety would be #'1 concerns to my
tenants and the owners of the buildin[Is."
"Great! Norm Cate promotes good will. Does a great job - he's sincere and cares! A real
professional - good for the City of Iowa City - need more workers like that!"
"Inspector arrived exactly on time and acted in a very professional manner. He offered some
helpful advice during his inspection and displayed a good amount of knowledge of construction
techniques."
"John Bovey could not have been more courteous or professional."
"1 thought John was very helpful and easy to deal with. Thank you."
"A good job at 47 Valley Avenue by Norm Cate."
"Prompt, courteous, and efficient. Mr. Bovey does an excellent job."
"The inspector, Norm Cate, was on time and very courteous. He was very professional and
open to discussion."
"City Housing & Inspection is the most efficient office/department in the city of Iowa City
Kingdom. They are a model that other city offices should look to copy!"
"You guys always do a good job. Thanks!"
"Mr. Norm Cate is friendly and helpful in assist to solve our problem."
"1 have always had good experiences with housing inspectors. They have always been polite
and have provided good direction. I have not always agreed with housing inspection policy;
however, those inspection policies I have disagreed with have never affected me directly.
Overall - very positive experience."
"Your fair code enforcement has always been appreciated by my family - keep it up!"
hisadm/comments.doc 4
CITY OF IOWA CITY
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Mayor, Council Members and City Manager
Riverfront & Natural Areas Commission
Terry Trueblood, Parks & Recreation Director
May 19, 1998
Park Tour
On behalf of the Parks and Recreation Commission, I would
like to extend an invitation to join us on the commission's
annual tour of parks and recreation facilities and open
space.
The tour is scheduled for Wednesday, June 10. The commission
will conduct a brief business meeting at 4:00 p.m. in meeting
room "B" at the Recreation Center, with the tour to begin as
soon as possible thereafter. Dinner will be provided, and we
hope to conclude the tour no later than 8:00 p.m.
In order to make proper transportation and meal arrangements,
we need to know how many people will be joining us. Please
complete the enclosed card, and return it by May 29.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
me.
encl.
cc: Parks and Recreation Commission
Comments:
PARKS & RECREATION TOUR
JUNE 10, 1998
I will attend..
I will not be able to attend.
NAME:
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
May 20, 1998
To: Steve Arkins, City Manager
From: Joe Fowler, Director Parking & Transit
Reference: Parking Ramp Usage
There have been some concerns raised recemly regarding the currein usage of the existing
parking facilities. Each facility serves a differera user group and has different demands.
The Capitol Street Ramp serves Old Capitol Cemer and the University of Iowa pemacrest
area, Dubuque Street serves the Holiday Inn and the Plaza, and Chauncey Swan serves
the Civic Center, Recreation Center and provides long term parking.
The operating policy of the Parking Division is to maintain sufficiem parking in the Capitol
and Dubuque Street Facilities to accommodate special events. Swan operates at a higher
occupancy percemage because it serves the long term employee - student parking demand.
Exact occupancy coums are available for the Capitol and Dubuque ramps. They are not
available for Swan because of the pay station operation. When a facility has 100 or less
spaces available it becomes unattractive to occasional users because of the difficulty
finding a space and the additional time required. Using this as a guide line the Capitol
Street ramp has had less than 100 spaces 40 times in the last six momhs or 23% of the
time, Dubuque 45 days or 25%. Many of these days the facilities were full.
The lower level of Chauncey Swan is fully occupied the majority of the time. The 48
spaces on the second level reserved for hourly parkers has less demand. There are 282
spaces on the upper floors that are shared by hourly parkers and permit holders. There are
over 300 permit holders currently assigned to these spaces.
There are over 100 persons curremly on the waiting list for parking permits. Some of
these are current permit holders waiting to move to other facilities. There is a constam
demand for permits with the biggest demand coming in August when apartmere leases
renew.
cc Je~ Davidson, Assistant Director Planning & Community Developmere
Bill Dollman, Parking Manager
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
May 21, 1998
City Manager and City Council
Maurice I. Head, Community Development Coordinator
Iowa City Housing Market Analysis (Housing Study)
In August 1997, the City selected and entered into a consulting contract with Maxfield Research
to perform a Housing Market Analysis for the Iowa City Urban Area (iowa City/University
Heights, Coralville, and North Liberty). This project is part of the FY97 CDBG Work Plan
recommended by the Housing and Community Development Commission (HCDC) and
approved by City Council.
It was believed that the housing study would provide a comprehensive, long-term measurement
of housing issues or market gaps in Iowa City. By developing this comprehensive analysis of the
housing market, a baseline could be established for identifying present and future housing
needs. This information could also assist and encourage developers to meet the housing
production requirements recommended in the report. From the City's standpoint, the information
could be helpful in determining priorities for future housing projects applying for CDBG, HOME
and General Fund assistance.
The Housing Market Analysis covers four primary areas. They are as follows:
· Analyzes demographic trends and housing characteristics in Iowa City and Johnson County
· Measures the impact of changes in the employment base on housing
· Assesses the current market for rental housing (including senior congregate and assisted
living) and for sale housing (including resale market and new construction)
· Provides recommendations concerning the need for new housing targeted to different
income segments in Iowa City
Although Maxfield Research encountered numerous problems and had several delays in
gathering information for the study, the Housing Market Analysis is now ready for distribution.
We have attached for your review an Executive Summary of the findings in the report. The
complete housing study (182 pages) is available for you at the Planning and Community
Development Department.
The President of Maxfield Research, Mr, Laurence Harmon, will present the Housing Market
Analysis to City Council and the HCDC at the June 15 work session. Mr. Harmon will discuss in
detail the findings and recommendations in the report. If you should have any questions in the
interim or would like to pick-up a full report, please let me know at 356-5244.
cc: Housing and Community Development Commission
Im~nem\mhS-19.doc
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Introduction
Maxfield Research Inc. was engaged by the City of Iowa City to conduct a comprehensive
housing needs study for Iowa City, Iowa. The study examines the amount and the types of
housing needed to satisfy demand fi'om current and future residents of the Iowa City Urban
Area through the year 2010, and estimates the proportion of this future housing demand that
the City of Iowa City could capture.
Demographic Analysis
Study Area Definition
An examination of growth trends and an analysis of the demographic composition of the pri-
mary draw area for housing in Iowa City was conducted in order to aid in the determination
of housing needs. The primary draw area (or "study area") consists of Johnson County,
which is defined by the U.S. Census as the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) for Iowa
City.
Johnson County consists of two distinct regions; 1) the Urban Area - which includes Iowa
City and the adjacent Cities of University Heights, Coralville and North Liberty, and 2) the
remainder of the Johnson County which is predominately rural in nature. For analytical ptr-
poses, these two regions are often presented in this report as separate sub-markets.
Population
An examination of recent growth trends revealed that Johnson County experienced substan-
tial growth over the last two decades. Between 1970 and 1990, the County's population in-
creased by 33 percent (or nearly 24,000 persons) and its household base increased by 60 per-
cent (roughly 13,600 households).
Population growth accelerated during the 1980s with an increase of 14,402 persons compared
to an increase of only 9,590 persons in Johnson County during the 1970s. Conversely,
household growth was more substantial during the 1970s (with an increase of 7,729 house-
holds), than during the 1980s (an increase of 5,847 households), indicating an increase in av-
erage household size.
Overall, the Urban Area accounted for roughly 80 percent of Johnson County's population
and household growth between 1970 and 1990. The Urban Area comprised a much larger
proportion of the County's growth during the 1980s (88 percent of the population and 82 per-
cent of the household growth) than it did during the 1970s (63 percent of the population and
75 percent of the household growth).
2
The population of Iowa City increased by 27 pement between 1970 and 1990, resulting in a
total of 59,738 persons in 1990, up from 46,850 persons in 1970. Population growth accel-
erated consklerably during the 1980s with an increase of 9,230 persons, compared to an in-
crease of only 3,658 persons during the 1970s.
Households
When examining the need for housing, households trends are a more important indicator of
housing needs than population trends since households represent occupied housing units.
Iowa City's household base increased by 49 pement between 1970 and 1990, for a total of
21,951 households in 1990, an increase of 7,185 households from 1970. Contrary to popula-
tion growth, the 1970s saw slightly greater increases in households (an increase of 3,828
households) than the 1980s (an increase of 3,357 households).
The following projections were made by Maxfield Research Inc. in light of projections
compiled by several nationally recognized demographic services firms and the Johnson
County Council of Governments, and were based on historic growth trends, a review of re-
cent and pending residential construction, land availability, a review of recent Special Census
data for North Liberty (1994) and Coralville (1992), and interviews with city officials and
major employers.
Johnson County will continue to see strong growth throughout the 1990s, however growth is
expected to taper-off slightly between 2000 and 2010. Maxfield Research has projected
Johnson County's population will increase by 12,380 persons (12.9 percent) from 1990 to
2000 and by 10,500 persons (9.1 percent) from 2000 to 2010. Meanwhile, Johnson County's
household base is expected to increase by 7,180 households (19.9 percent) during the 1990s
and 6,250 households (14.5 percent) between 2000 and 2010.
The majority of this growth will be concentrated in the Iowa City Urban Area. The urban
area is expected to see an increase of nearly 9,950 persons (16.2 percent) and 5,840 house-
holds (20.7 percent) during the 1990s and 8,000 persons (9.0 percent) and 5,000 households
(14.7 percent) between 2000 and 2010.
Age Distribution
A review of the age distribution of the population revealed that in 1990, nearly one-quarter
of the County's population and slightly more than one-third of Iowa City's population was
between the ages of 18 and 24. In comparison, only about 10.0 percent of the population in
the State of Iowa fell within this age cohort. This data reveals the impact of the University
of Iowa on the study area's economy and housing market.
Based on an aging of the older adult population (persons age 45 and older), Maxfield fore-
casts that Johnson County's senior household base will increase by 1,090 households (23.5
percent) during the 1990s and by 1,610 households (28.2 percent) between 2000 and 2010.
This accelerated growth will likely continue at least through 2030, as baby boomers begin
reaching thqir senior years in 2011, ensuring that demand for alternative housing options for
seniors will continue to increase.
Household Tenure (Homeownership Rates)
Overall, Johnson County had a homeownership rate of 52.7 percent in 1990 compared to a
homeownership rate of 70.0 percent for the State of Iowa. About 95.0 percent of all renters
in Johnson County lived in the Urban Area. Iowa City accounted for approximately 71 per-
cent of all the renters in the County. Another 17 percent of Johnson County renters lived in
Coralville.
The percentage of homeholds that rent their homing is much higher in Coralville and Iowa
City (62.1 and 55.3 percent, respectively) than in University Heights (29.5 percent), North
Liberty (28.2 percent) or the Remainder of Johnson County (20.5 percent), primarily due to
the large concentration of students renting housing in these two communities.
The 25 to 34 and the 15 to 24 age cohorts had, by far, the largest number of renters in the
study area, with 6,628 and 5,642 renter homeholds, respectively. The 15 to 24 age group
consists primarily of students while the 25 to 34 age group includes both graduate and pro-
fessional students as well as young working adults. Nearly 94.0 percent of all households age
15 to 24 and 78.0 percent of all households age 25 to 34 resided in either Iowa City or
Coralville in 1990.
Income
Income data is critical when considering the ability of homeholds to pay for homing. Income
data is particularly important when examining the market for senior homing since a large
proportion of senior households have limited incomes.
· The overall median household income for all study area households was approximately
$40,100 in 1997. Median incomes are significantly higher in the remainder of Johnson
County ($54,323) than in the Urban Area ($36,605), largely due to the higher proportion of
young adults (particularly students) in the Urban Area.
· University Heights had, by far, the highest median income ($62,083) of the communities
within the Urban Area, followed by Coralville ($38,458), North Liberty ($35,915), and Iowa
City ($35,011). Again, the median income in Iowa City and to some extent Coralville, are
skewed downwards by the large number of students, as well as a larger presence of subsi-
dized homing.
Incomes peak in the middle-age adult cohorts. The 45 to 54 and the 55 to 64 age groups had
the highest median incomes in the study area, $64,162 and $61,169, respectively. Con-
versely, young adults (age 15 to 24) and older senior homeholds had the lowest median
4
incomes, $16,463 and $23,564, respectively. Young adult households are more often single
persons, typically students or individuals just starting their careers. Older seniors (75+) often
live only on. retirement income and also include many single-person households.
University of Iowa Student Population/Housing Profile
University oflowa enrollment projections forecast a gradual increase over the next 10 years
with a projected increase of about another 1,410 students (5.1 percent) between 1997 and
2007. The majority of this growth will come from undergraduate students, with a projected
increase of roughly 1,330 students (7.1 percent), while the number of graduate/professional
students is expected to increase by only 80 students (0.9 percent).
In 1996, only about 16 percent of University of Iowa students were originally fxom Johnson
County and another 17 percent came from an adjacent counties; thus, at least two-thirds of
the students would not be able to commute to school from their homes.
The University's residence halls have a maximum design capacity to house 5,842 students.
Occupancy rates have averaged nearly 95 percent between 1992 and 1996.
In addition, there are a total of 749 apartment units owned by the University of Iowa for m~-
ried students and/or students with families. Occupancy rates at these apartments averaged
99.0 percent over the five-year period.
According to our interviews, the University of Iowa has no plans to develop any additional
student housing at this time. Thus, the expected growth in enrollment at the University will
continue to place a strain on the rental housing market in and near the campus.
Pheasant Ridge Apartments, a large subsidized rental project located near the University
campus in Iowa City, houses a significant number of students, particularly students with
families. It was also mentioned that there is some opposition in the community to subsidiz-
ing rent for students.
Our interviews revealed that some University of Iowa statFfaeulty believe the University
should take responsibility for housing students.
Emvlovment Overview
Between 1980 and July 1997, the number of employed residents in Johnson County increased
by 21,800 persons or 51.7 percent. Meanwhile, the unemployment rate declined from 3.4 to
2.4 percent during this period.
The number of jobs in Johnson County increased by 21,000, or 48.8 percent, from 1980 to
1996, for a total of 64,000 jobs in 1996. Johnson County's job growth rate was twice that of
the State of Iowa's (24.4 percent) during this same period.
5
A comparison of residential and covered employment reveals that the number of employed
residents of Johnson County (63,400 persons in 1996) is slightly less than the number of jobs
in the County that are covered by unemployment insurance (64,000 jobs in 1996). This indi-
cates that a number of individuals working in Johnson County are commuting from surround-
ing counties. It is important to note that the covered employment figures exclude self-
employed individuals, railroad workers and some agricultural workers, among others.
A total net increase of 129 workers is projected for the 26 largest employers in the Iowa City
Urban Area between 1997 and 2000. The projected net decrease of 494 employees at the
University of Iowa Hospital is expected to balance out much of the projected increases in
employment at other employers.
17 percent of the total 33,121 employees of major employers surveyed reside outside of John-
son County. This percentage increases to 26 percent when University employees are
eluded.
Housin~ Characteristics
The Iowa City Urban Area gained 4,827 homeholds during the 1980s. There were 1,917
additional homeholds that owned their housing and 2,955 more households renting their
housing in 1990. Iowa City accounted for roughly 55.0 percent of the Urban Area's gain in
owner households and nearly g0.0 percent of its renter households during the 1980s.
A review of the age of the Urban Area's housing stock revealed that about 4,700 units in the
Urban Area (16 percent of the entire housing stock) were built prior to 1940. Nearly 94 per-
cent (or 4,400 units) were located in Iowa City. These homing units have a greater probabil-
ity of being physically or functionally obsolete and some may need to be rehabilitated or ~-
placed.
Mobile homes were the second largest type of owner-occupied housing in Johnson County
accounting for 2,218 units or 11.7 percent of all owner-occupied units in 1990. Mobile
homes usually serve as a low-cost temporary housing alternative and increases in the use of
mobile homes can indicate shortages of affordable permanent ownership housing options.
Building permits for a total of 7,065 new housing units were issued in Johnson County be-
tween 1990 and the third quarter of 1997, an average of about 912 units per year. The'Urban
Area accounted for nearly 80.0 percent of the new housing units permitted, with a total of
5,587 permits issued, an average of 721 per year.
Iowa City accounted for 62.4 percent of the new single-family units and 52.1 percent of the
new multifamily units in the Urban Area between 1990 and 1997, an average of 160 single-
family units and 240 multifamily units per year.
· A total of 163 housing units (71 single-family homes and 92 multifamily units) were razed in
Iowa City between 1990 and October 1997, an average of approximately 21 units per year.
For-Sale Housing Market Analysis
According to the data provided by the Iowa Association of Realtors, between January 1994
and December 1997, there were a total of 5,445 homes sales in Johnson County. Single-
family homes accounted for nearly 70 percent, condominiums accounted for about 20 percent
and zero-lot-line homes accounted for 10 percent of all home sales.
About 55 percent of all homes sold were located in Iowa City/University Heights; 29 percent
were located in Coralville or North Liberty; and 16 percent were located in the remainder of
Johnson County.
Single-family housing is most costly in Coralville. As of December 1997, the median sale
price of single-family homes in Coralville was $138,500, compared to $122,500 in Iowa City,
$110,000 in North Liberty and $ I 10,900 in the remainder of the county.
Zero-lot-line housing is most costly in Iowa City. As of December 1997, zero-lot line homes
had a median sale price orS111,400 in Iowa City, $96,300 in Coralville and $83,900 in North
Liberty.
Between January 1994 and December 1997, condominiums sold in Iowa City had an average
sale price of $96,700 and a median sale price of $84,250. The average sale price in Iowa
City is about $20,200 (26 percent) more than Coralville, $30,400 (46 percent) more than
North Liberty and $13,900 (17 percent) more than in the Remainder of Johnson County.
Between 1994 and December 1997, the median sale price of single-family homes in Johnson
County increased by 7.5 percent, while the median price of zero-lot line home increased by
19.7 laercent. Conversely, the median sale prices for condominium units declined by 19.7
percent.
Since 1990, there have been 1,526 lots platted in 29 subdivisions in Iowa City. As of De-
cember 1, 1997, 743 permits have been issued for 776 dwelling units (including 33 duplexes)
in these subdivisions leaving a total of 783 vacant lots.
A review of the prices of the 514 lots available for sale through the local Multiple Listing
Service in October of 1997, revealed that median lot prices in Iowa City ($41,500) were
lower than in Coralville ($45,000) or the remainder of the county ($44,000), but substantially
higher than in North Liberty ($28,825).
All 12 mobile home communities located in the Urban Area as well as three communities
adjacent to the Urban Area were surveyed. The 15 mobile home communities surveyed have
a combined total of 2,639 pads, 103 of which were vacant at the time of our survey, resulting
in a vacancy rate of 3.9 percent. Eight mobile home communities were located in Iowa City.
These communities have a combined total of 1,165 pads and had a vacancy rate of 3.4 per-
cent in December 1997.
· One-third o['the mobile home communities accounted for 90 percent of the vacant lots and
one-third of the communities were fully occupied.
A 40-acre, 220-1ot planned modular home community in Iowa City (Saddlebrook) was also
identified. The first phase of the project had just recently opened in 1997. While the owner
would not disclose the number of lots that have been absorbed, he did mention that additional
phases are tentatively planned.
Interviews with real estate agents indicated that most tim-time buyers are typically looking
for homes in the $70,000 to $140,000 range, while job transferees and move-up buyers are
seeking homes in the $120,000 to $250,000 range. Small condominiums in the $60,000 to
$75,000 price range and newly constructed homes in the $100,000 to $120,000 category are
the products most in demand. Residential investment properties located near the University
of Iowa, such as small homes with 2 or 3 bedrooms, are also in high demand.
Several building principals stated that increasing land and construction costs are causing
profit margins to shrink and in order to make a decent profit they must build more expensive
homes. Others cited the high cost of regulations also cause higher home prices.
Many of the builder/developers interviewed also mentioned that Iowa City, in particular, has
a reputation for excessively stringent building code requirements, that the city officials and
the Council are difficult to work with and that the planning and zoning process is very time
consuming (and adds significantly to development costs).
Both builders and real estate professionals stated that because of the high cost of housing in
Iowa City, people are beginning to move to communities such as North Liberty, Tiffin, So-
lon, Lone Tree, West Branch and Riverside where the cost of housing is significantly less.
Rental Market Analysis
Maxfield Research surveyed all of the general occupancy subsidized and moderate-rent proj-
ects as well as the majority of market rate rental projects of 12 or more units in the Iowa City
Urban'Area in October and November 1997. The survey included a total of 5,650 general
occupancy rental units. There were 129 rental units vacant in these projects at the time of the
survey, for an overall vacancy rate of 2.3 percent.
There are seven subsidized general occupancy rental projects in the Iowa City Urban Area
(including 79 scattered-site units owned by the Iowa City Public Housing Authority treated
here as one project). Combined, these projects have a total of 474 units. Only four units
were vacant when surveyed, a vacancy rate of 0.8 percent. All four vacant units were located
in two projects in North Liberty.
8
In addition to the project-based subsidized housing units, there are currently 877 low-income
households receiving rental assistance either through vouchers or certificates issued by the
Iowa City Public Housing Authority (ICPHA) allowing them to find affordable rental hom-
ing in the area. Currently, the ICPHA has over 800 households on its waiting list awaiting
rental assistance.
Two modest-rent general occupancy projects with a total of 150 units exist in the Urban
Area. These projects are restricted to households with incomes below 60 percent of the
County's median income and have below market rents. Five units were vacant (a vacancy
rate of 3.3 percent) between the two projects when surveyed.
A total of 135 "larger" (12 or more units) market rate general occupancy rental complexes
were surveyed. These projects have a total of 5,026 units, of which 120 were vacant when
surveyed, translating to a vacancy rate of 2.4 percent. Typically, market rate rental housing is
considered to be in equilibrium with a vacancy rate of 5.0 percent, to allow for sufficient con-
sumer choice and unit turnover.
· Nearly three-quarters of the market rate rental units surveyed were located in Iowa City. The
rental projects in Iowa City had a combined vacancy rate of 1.9 percent.
Average rents were significantly higher in Iowa City ($536 per month), than in Coralville
($466 per month) or North Liberty ($487 per month), but were skewed upwards slightly, in
part, because of the higher proportion of larger units (three-, four- and five-bedroom units)
geared towards students in Iowa City.
Through the course of our research, we identified three planned or proposed general occu-
pancy rental projects in the Iowa City Urban Area. These include: 16 townhome-style m~r-
ket rate rental units under consauction in Iowa City by The Greater Iowa City Housing Fal-
lowship; a 36-unit, m-credit financed project to be developed by Bums & Bums Architects
in North Liberty; and a 72-unit, tax-credit financed project planned by an unnamed developer
in Coralville.
Senior Housin~ Market Analysis
There are 17 senior housing projects in Johnson County with a total of 773 units. Five other
senior. projects, with a total 6f 75 units, located in communities just outside Johnson County
were also surveyed. At the time of our survey, these 22 projects had only 13 vacant units, a
vacancy rate of 1.5 percent.
The 11 senior subsidized projects surveyed have a total of 391 units. Only five units were
vacant at the time of the survey, a vacancy rate of 1.3 percent. Vacancy rates of less than 2.0
percent are common in subsidized projects, since demand for this type of housing is need-
driven based on income. Nearly every subsidized project surveyed had a waiting list. Nine
of the subsidized projects were located within Johnson County, the other two projects were
located just outside Johnson County in the Cities of Wellman and West Branch.
9
The 11 market rate senior projects either in or near Johnson County have a total of 457 units,
of which 1 ] units were vacant when surveyed, a vacancy rate of 2.4 petcent. This is well
below the 5.0 petcent vacancy rate considered normal in a healthy non-subsidized market,
indicating pent-up demand for market rate senior housing.
Ofthe senior projects located in or near Johnson County; four projects, with a total of 119
units, are targeted towards younger active seniors and offered no support services. Two other
projects, with a total of 24 units, offer services on a optional basis, four projects, with a total
of 306 units, include basic supportservices (i.e. meals, housekeeping) in the monthly rents,
and one 8-unit assisted living facility is located just outside Johnson County.
Maxfield Research Inc. identified several planned or proposed senior projects in the Iowa
City Urban Area. Altogether these developments, if developed as planned, could add 192
units of affordable independent senior housing, 74 units of market rate independent senior
housing and 81 units of assisted living housing.
Housing Demand Analysis
Based on projected household growth, replacement need, and pent-up demand, Maxfield Re-
search estimates a need for an additional 6,800 housing units in the Urban Area through
2010, with an immediate (through 2000) demand of 1,580 units.
Overall rental demand for the Urban Area was estimated at 2,825 units through 2010; and
included demand for 1,050 subsidized units, 1,255 affordable units, and 520 market rate
units. Immediate demand is comprised of 410 units of subsidized general occupancy rental
housing, 185 units of affordable general occupancy housing, and 90 units of market rate goa-
eral occupancy rental housing.
Demand for ownership housing in the Urban Area was calculated at about 3,050 units
through 2010. This included demand for roughly 1,730 single-family units and 1,320 mulli-
family units. We estimate immediate demand for another roughly 290 single-family units
and 140 units of multifamily in the Urban Area over the next two years.
Senior housing demand was estimated at about 945 units for the Urban Area through 2010,
and consisted of 85 units of subsidized housing, 220 units of affordable housing, 340 units of
independent market rate housing and 295 units of assisted living. Short-term demand
through 2000 was estimated at 45 units of subsidized housing, 140 units of affordable hous-
ing, 165 units of market rate housing and 120 units of assisted living.
Recommended Housin~ Develovment Strategy for Iowa City
We have reconunended that the City of Iowa City set a goal to attempt to capture roughly 70
percent of the Urban Area's housing demand through 2010.
10
The following Table summarizes our suggested development concepts for Iowa City tb. rough
the year 2005.
RECOMMENDED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
IOWA CITY
Through 1998-2005
Senior*Specific Housing
lndcl~ndcnt
Subsidized
,4fiordable
Market Rate
1998-2005
485
325
25
140
160
Assisted Living
160
Ownership Housing
Single-family
Multifamily
Townhomes (i4.ont-to-back)
Townhomes (back-to-back)
Zero-Lot-Line
l,!SO
600
550
180-200
150-180
170-220
Rental Housing 1,355
Subsidized 500
Affordable 580
Market Rate 275
[Total 2,990 [
Source: Maxfield Research Inc.
More'detailed information regarding the recommended development concepts can be found
in the Recommended Development Strategy section at the end of the report.
11
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
May 19, 1998
City Manager and City Council
Scott Kugler, Associate Planner
Neighborhood Compatibility Design Guidelines for Infill Apartment Buildings.
Some time ago the City Council requested that staff and the Planning and Zoning
Commission consider ways of improving the compatibility of new multi-family buildings in
older residential neighborhoods. This request came as a result of public criticisms
expressed over the construction of a number of recent apartment buildings. This item is
now near the top of the Commission's pending list. In the interim, staff has been collecting
information on how other communities have addressed this problem, has been evaluating
both good and bad examples of infill apartment construction in Iowa City and other
communities, and has developed a draft set of guidelines to build upon. Staff is now ready
to begin serious consideration of this pending list item.
Rather than finalizing a set of guidelines based on this information and presenting them to
the Commission and Council for adoption, staff is proposing to form a citizen committee to
discuss this issue and finalize a set of design guidelines for consideration. This committee
would be comprised of individuals involved in the development of infill apartment buildings,
as well as residents of the city's older neighborhoods. It would likely also include member
of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Historic Preservation Commission, and a local
architect. It is hoped that this committee can be assembled and begin meeting over the
summer, and would have a proposal to present to the Planning and Zoning Commission
within the next few months.
Provided the Council is in agreement with this approach, staff will begin contacting
individuals about serving on this committee over the next couple of weeks, and will try to
convene its first meeting sometime in June. If you have any questions or comments about
this proposal, please feel free to contact me or Robert Miklo at 356-5230.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Historic Preservation Commission
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
Division of Building Inspections 410 Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240
May18,1998
Mark Johnson
Johnson Builders
P.O. Box 5293
Coralville, lA 52241
Dear Mr. Johnson,
This is a brief response to the three main issues that you raised to Dennis Mitchell on
Wednesday May 13.
ISSUE: Division policy regarding fire separation between a garden room and the rest of
a dwelling unit.
RESPONSE: We have experienced a recent increase in the number of new homes
incorporating garden rooms in their design. These rooms generally include an overhead
door or a set of double doors leading to the rear yard and are very similar in use to a
detached garden shed. There is a high probability that lawn and garden equipment
which use and contain gasoline, such as lawn mowers, rototillers, chipper-shredders, or
snowblowers would be stored in this room. Therefore, these rooms are classified as a
Group U (utility) occupancy by the Uniform Building Code (UBC) the same as an
attached garage. UBC Table 3-B requires a one hour fire separation between a U
occupancy and an R (residential) occupancy. Section 302.4 except!on 3 allows a
reduction in this separation to the application of one hour materials on the U side only
and the installation of a solid core, self-closing, tight fitting door in lieu of a full one hour
assembly with a labeled door.
These code requirements are included as plan review notes for each plan which
designates a garden room as part of the plan submitted for a building permit. I checked
with Cedar Rapids and Coralville and they treat garden rooms in the same manner.
ISSUE: Maximum stair riser height and maximum variation in riser height in a stairway.
RESPONSE: Section 1006.3 of the UBC allows a maximum riser height of 8" in a
private stairway and stipulates that ~the greatest riser height in any flight of stairs shall
not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 of an inch". This is a very specific
requirement with which I can see no interpretation necessary.
ISSUE: Safety glazing in windows adjacent to a door.
RESPONSE: Section 2406.4 of the UBC identifies "glazing in fixed or operable panels
adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc
of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed
edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above grade above the walking surface" as a
hazardous location which requires the installation of safety glazing. The building
inspection division. has a stamp which is used to identify these locations when they are
indicated on the approved plan.
These building code requirements are very basic and have been consistently enforced
by this division on all construction projects. The reason these items became a problem
on the projects at 704 and 746 Arlington is that the plans which were submitted and
approved for construction by the Iowa City Building Inspection Division, were
significantly altered dudng the construction project without informing building division
staff members of the changes or submitting amended plans for review and approval.
As to your assertion that I, or anyone in our division, refused to provide a written
interpretation of a specific, interpretable code section; I can only assure you that your
request was not clearly understood. Neither Doug Boothroy or I came away from our
meeting with you with the understanding that any wdtten interpretation had been
requested. I am very willing to provide a verbal or wdtten division interpretation of a
code section which is subjective and demands local interpretation. In addition, all
interpretations or actions by our staff regarding the building code can be appealed to the
Board of Appeals.
All members of the Building Inspection Division welcome open and honest debate of
building code requirements. In fact, many of our lunch hours are spent in exactly that
manner. We encourage you to bring any specific suggested changes to the Building
Code forward to the Board of Appeals dudng the upcoming meetings regarding the
adoption of the 1997 UBC. Specific language changes to specify code sections should
be submitted pdor to preparation of the meeting agenda so that board members can
review and evaluate proposed changes before the public meeting. The Board of
Appeals meets on the first Monday of each month at 4:30 in the lobby conference room
of the Civic Center. The agenda is closed to new items one week pdor to the meeting
date.
If you have any further questions regarding regulations enforced by our division, please
contact me at 356-5122.
Cordially,
Ron Boose
Senior Building Inspector
cc:',~oug Boothroy, Director of Housing and Inspection Services
Dennis Mitchell, Assistant City Attorney
MEDIA RELEASE
Memorial Day Holiday Schedule
May 15, 1998
Contact: City Manager's Office
356-5010
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
City offices at the Civic Center will be closed Monday, May 25, 1998, in
observance of Memorial Day. A schedule of City services is as follows:
· Iowa City transit buses
will not operate.
· Parking meters
will not be enfomed.
· Parking in the ramps
will be free.
· Iowa City Public Library
closed.
· Senior Center
closed. Senior meals not served.
· Iowa City Recreation Center
offices will be closed. The pool, gym, and game room will be open from 1:00 p.m. to
9:00 p.m. The pools at Mercer Park and City Park will be open from 1:00 p.m. to
9:00 p.m.
· Iowa City Landfill
will be closed.
· Refuse, recycling, and yard waste
not collected on Monday, May 25. Residents on the Monday route should place
refuse, recycling, and yard waste at the curb by 7:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 26.
Residents on the Tuesday through Friday routes should have refuse, recycling, and
yard waste at the curb by 7:00 a.m. on their REGULAR collection day. The City
cannot determine exactly when items will be collected.
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 · (319) 356-5000 * FAX (319) 356-5009
May 15, 1998
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
PRESS RELEASE
CONTACT PERSON:
Brad Neumann
Waste Management Planner
Johnson County Council of Governments
Phone: 356-5235
PAINT AND HOUSEHOLD BA'I-I'ERY CLEANUP DAY
A Paint and Household Battery Cleanup Day has been scheduled for Saturday, June 6, 1998.
The event will be held at the Iowa City Transit facility on South Riverside Drive. You must call
for an appointment in advance to participate in the Cleanup Day. Call 341-8540 on June 1
through June 5, between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. to schedule an appointment. Cleanup
Day hours will be from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and will be limited to about 385 participants.
Items collected at the event include oil and latex based paints, and household (dry cell) batteries
only.
A paint give-away will be held at a later date; watch for the announcement in the newspapers.
There will be no charge for paint at this event.
indexlm~tr~oainbatt.doc
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240-1B26 · (319) 3:56-$000 · FAX (31'9) 356-5009
PRESS RELEASE
May 20, 1998
CITY OF I0 WA
Contact: Iowa City Landfill
Phone Number: 356-5185
The City of Iowa City still has a large stockpile of old street paver bdcks available for sale at the
Iowa City Landfill. These bdcks were originally used on Iowa City streets that have since been
replaced with a newer surface. Many bdcks may have concrete or asphalt stuck to them so they
may require some cleaning. The cost for the bdcks will be 4 cents per pound, cash or check will be
accepted. Each brick weighs about 8 pounds. This sale will be conducted on a first come, first
served basis. There is no limit. Residents may load their own bdcks for a designated pile after
weighing in their vehicle at the landfill scale house. Each vehicle will also be weighed on the way
out to determine the cost of the bdcks. You will not need to count the bricks when loading. Bdcks
may be pumhased at the Landfill Monday through Saturday, 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., beginning
January 26. Call the Iowa City Landfill with questions the phone number is 356-5185.
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY, IOWA 32240-1826 · (319) 336-5000 · FAX (319) 356-5009
BS/1B/':J[{ Bg:;Z3:39 319-354-~.13 -> 3193565Bi{9 II]l,kq Cl'l'V CL'g~KPage BBZ
Joe Bolkcom, Chairperson
Charles D. Duffy
Jonalhan Jordahl
Stephen P. Lacina
Sally Stutsman
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
May 19, 1998
INFORMAL MEETING
Agenda
1. Call to order 9:00 a.m.
2. Review of the formal minutes of May 14t~
3. Business from the Burnell Chadek, Interim Director of S.E.A.T.S.
a) Discussion re: FY '99 contract with Heritage Area Agency on Aging
for S.E.A.T.S. service.
b) Other
Business from Jim McGinley, Director of Emergency Management
Services re' resent disaster in Johnson County.
Business from Rolm Berinobis, Account Executive of Wellmark Blue
Cross/Blue Shield of Iowa re: health management review and premiums.
discussion
Business from the County Engineer
a) Discussion re: set bid letting date of June 22, 1998 for Johnson County
Project L-T-27-1 (RCB Culvert on Wapsi Avenue m Section 27-78-5).
b) Discussion re: right-of-way acquisition for shoulder widening project
on Wapsi Avenue between Highway //22 and 520~ Street with the
following:
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319} 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-6086
I~/1B/[JI] I~J::~4:88 31~-3r-~4-4213 -> 31935fi5889 IOIdfi CITY CT,~K Page 883
Agenda 5-19-98
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
13)
14)
Page 2
1) Right-of-way contract with Richard J. Krueger and Deanna R.
Krueger for $50.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Ronald Cemy for $1,778.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Paul K. Forbes for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Hotz Farms, Inc. for $4,050.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Larew Farms for $1,745.00 for Johnson
County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Keith Hotz for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Cerny Farms, Inc. an Iowa Corporation
for $4,137.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Tenant contract with Paul Forbes for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Charles J. Mullinnix, Wilma J.
Mullinnix, Donald A. Mullirmix, and Donna M. Mullinnix for
$1,810.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Alan Sexton for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Elizabeth A. Hotz for $4,556.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Harold D. and Doris P. Schuessler for
$2,450.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Dennis D. Schuessler for $25.00 for Johnson
County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Shirley J. Buline, Lyle Buline and
Linda Buline for $5,548.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-
-55-52.
15) Right-of-way contract with Dorothy F. Parizek for $2,280.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
16) Tenant contract with William J. Coan for $75.00 for Johnson
County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
17) Right-of-way contract with Kevin D. Forbes and Lisa K. Forbes for
$2,275.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
18) Right-of-way contract with Kevin D. Forbes and Lisa K. Forbes for
$2,072.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
19) Right-of-way contract with John A. Pechman for $3,040.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
20) Right-of-way contract with Kevin D. Forbes and Lisa K. Forbes for
$1,990.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
85/18/98 ~9:24:59 319-354-4213 -> 319~5658B9 I0~ CIW CLERR Page 884
Agenda 5-19-98 Page 3
21) Right-of-way contract with Paul K. Forbes, Kevin D. Forbes and
Lisa K. Forbes for $2,100.00 for Johnson County Project FM-
52(34)--55-52.
c) Discussion re: Wetlands mitigation for future construction projects.
d) Discussion re: scheduling work session for calcium chloride program.
e) Other
7. Business from Mike Sullivan, Ambulance Director re: ambulance
services in Johnson County. discussion
8. Business from the County Auditor
a) Discussion re:
b) Discussion re:
Other
resolution amending the FY '98 budget.
resolution changing departmental appropriations.
9. Business from the Board of Supervisors
a)
b)
c) Reports
d) Other
Discussion re: update on employee computer program. (Sally)
Minutes received
1. Advisory Council for Heritage Area Agency on Aging for March
26, 1998
2. Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission for April 15, 1998
3. Johnson County Task Force Heritage Area Agency on Aging for
April 20, 1998
4. Johnson County Mental Health/Developmental Disabilities
Planning Council for April 21, 1998
5. Communications Committee of the Advisory Council for April 23,
1998
6. Internal Newsletter Sub-Communication Committee for May 8,
1998
7. Johnson County Decat Project Planning Committee~or Ma_.y 12,
1998 :~;- ~; -~
10. 10:00 a.m. - Work Session with Secondary Roads Department
a)
Discussion re: clearing right-of-way.
1. Level B Roads
BSYlB/9B 89;25;31 319--354-42.13 -> 31935658B9 II]l,~q CITV CI~ P,,ge BI{5
Agenda 5-19-98
2. Other roads
3. Communications with the public
b) Other
11.
3:00p.m. Meeting with Senior Center
parking, operations and other. discussion
Center)
12. Discussion from the public
13. Recess
Page 4
Commission re: contract,
(lids will be at the Senior
85/28/98 18:41:2B 319-354-4213 -> 31935658H9 IOtkq CITY CLERK Page 8B2
Jebmon Count)'
Joe Bolkcom, Chairperson
Charles D. Duffy
Jonathan Jordahl
Stephen P. La¢ina
Sally Stutsman
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
May 21, 1998
FORMAL MEETING
REVISED
1. Call to order 9:00 a.m.
2. Action re: claims
Agenda
3. Action re: formal minutes of May 14th
4. Action re: payroll authorizations
5. Business from the County Auditor
a) Action re: permits
b) Action re: reports
c) Other
Business from Pat Jensen, Representative from the Johnson County
League of Women Voters re: update of activities of the county.
discussion
7. "9:30 a.m. Public Hearing on FY'98 budget amendment.
a) Action re: resolution amending the FY'98 budget.
b) Action re: resolution changing departmental appropriations.
Other.
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-6086
!J5/2~/98 18:41:52 319-354-4213 -> 31':J~:,6.qiW{9 IiM, M:b CITY CLERI{Page 883
Agenda 5-21-98 Page 2
8. Business from the Planning and Zoning Administrator
a) Final consideration of application Z9803A ofMaricl Sotzen.
b) Final consideration of application Z9813A of Louis and Ila Ernst.
c) Final consideration of application Z9816 of Lynn A. Detweiler.
d) Final consideration of application Z9817 of Emilie Young.
e) Motion setting public hearing for Conditional Use Permit CU9804
Other
9. Business from the Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator
a) Discussion/action re: the following Platting applications:
1. Application S9813A of Louis and Ila Ernst, signed by Louis
Ernst, requesting preliminary and final plat approval of Digby
Station Subdivision, a subdivision described as being located in
the NW ¼ of Section 4; Township 79 North; Range 5 West of the
5th P.M. m Johnson County, Iowa. (This is a 1-lot, 3.94 acre,
residential subdivision, located on the east side of Utah Avenue
NE, approximately ½ mile north of Herbert Hoover Highway NE
m Scott Twp.)
2. Application S9817 of Eddie R. Slach requesting preliminary and
final plat approval of Slach's Comer, a subdivision located in the
NW ¼ of Section 33; Township 79 North; Range 8 West of the
5t~ P.M. in Johnson County, Iowa. (This is a 1-lot, 6.98 acre,
residential subdivision, located on the north side of Black
Diamond Road SW, in the NE quadrant of the Black Diamond
Road SW and Calkins Avenue SW intersection in Har0.ha Tw~)
b) Other
Business from the County Attorney
~i) Report re: other items
10.
Business from the Board of Supervisors
a) Motion to hold both informal and formal meetings for the week of
June 14th on June 18th.
18:42.:29 319-t91-/213 -> 319356588 ll]M/t Oil"/ I:!,!~l/RPa{e liB4
Agenda 5-21-98 Page 3
b) Motion setting bid letting date of June 22, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. for
Johnson County Project L-T-27-1 (RCB Culvert on Wapsi Avenue in
Section 27-78-5).
c) Action re: right-of-way acquisition for shoulder widening project on
Wapsi Avenue between Highway #22 and 520th Street with the
following:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
lO)
12)
13)
14)
Right-of-way contract with Richard J. Krueger and Deanna R.
Krueger for $50.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Ronald Cerny for $1,778.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Tenant contract with Paul K. Forbes for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Hotz Farms, Inc. for $4,050.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Larew Farms for $1,745.00 for Johnson
County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Keith Hotz for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Cemy Farms, Inc. an Iowa Corporation
for $4,137.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Paul Forbes for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Charles J. Mullinnix, Wilma J.
Mullinnix, Donald A. Mullinnix, and Donna M. Mullinnix for
$1,810.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Alan Sexton for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Elizabeth A. Hotz for $4,556.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Harold D. and Doris P. Schuessler for
$2,450.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
Tenant contract with Dennis D. Schuessler for $25.00 for Johnson
County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Shirley J. Buline, Lyle Buline and
Linda Buline for $5,548.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-
-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Dorothy F. Parizek for $2:,280.00:~for.
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52.
BS/2B/':JB 18:43:15 319-354-4213 -> 319".JSS.,~{B9 I0~ Cl'l'Y CLE!~ Pagu B85
Agenda 5-21-98
ld) Tenet
17)
19)
2O)
21)
Page 4
contract with William J. Coan for $75.00 for Johnson
County Project FM-5204)--55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Kevin D. Forbes and Lisa K. Forbes for
$2,275.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Kevin D. Forbes and Lisa K. Forbes for
$2,072.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with John A. Pechman for $3,040.00 for
Johnson County Project FM-52(34)-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Kevin D. Forbes and Lisa K. Forbes for
$1,990.00 for Johnson County Project FM-5204)-55-52.
Right-of-way contract with Paul K. Forbes, Kevin D. Forbes and
Lisa K. Forbes for $2,100.00 for Johnson County Project FM-
52(34)--55-52.
c) Motion authorizing the County Attorney to begin condunnmtion
proceedings for fight way to be acquired from the following property
owners for Johnson County Project FM-52(34) 55-52 (shoulder
widening, etc. on Wapsi Ave. Between Highway #22 and 520th
Street): Maxine Hammer and Dale Hammer, Alan Burr and Nancy
Burr and Nancy S. Burr and Rosetta Burr
d) Action re: FY'99 contract with Heritage Area Agency on Aging for
S.E.A.T.S. service in the amount of $8,000 for fides to Semor Dining
sites and $1,000 for the delivery of meals to those receiving them.
e) Other
11. Adjourn to informal meeting
a) Work Session re: Advisory Committee for S.E.A.T.S. Para-Transit
service. discussion
b) Inquiries and reports f~om the public
c) Reports and inquiries from the members of the Board of Supervisors
d) Report from the County Attorney
Other
12. Adjournment
Johnson CounD' I
Joe Bolkcom, Chairperson
Charles D. Duffy
Jonalhan Jordahl
Stephen P. Lacina
Sally Stutsman
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
May 26, 1998
INFORMAL MEETING
1. Call to order 9:00 a.m.
Agenda
2. Review of the formal minutes of May 21st
Business from the County Engineer re: Right of way acquisition for
shoulder widening project on Wapsi Avenue between Highway #22 and
520th Street with the following:
a) Right-of-way contract with Edward H. Rossman and Margaret E.
Rossman for $3,920.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52
b) Right-of-way contract with Donald Cemy and Ruby Cemy (Fee
owner) and Floyd E. Hotz (C.P.) for $1,760.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52
c) Tenant contract with Thomas C. Hotz for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52
d) Right-of-way contract with Elizabeth Anne Chudacek, Mary Ellen
Chudacek, and William J. Chudacek, all individually and as partners of
Chudacek Partnership, and Iowa general partnership, for $2,720.00 for
Johnson County Project FM- 52(34)--55-52
e) Tenant contract with Russ Forbes for $80.00 for Johnson County
Project FM- 52(34)--55-52
t') Right-of-way contract with Floyd E. Hotz and Elizabeth A. Hotz for
$3,046.00 for Johnson County Project FM-52(34)--55-52
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-6086
85/Z2/98 14:18:88 319-354-4213 -> 31935&5889 IOWfi CITY CLERH Page 883
Agenda $-26-98
Page 2
g) Tenant contract with Thomas C. Hotz for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52
h) Right-of-way contract with Donald K. Wolf and Janie W. Wolf,
Trustees, the Don and Wynette Wolf Trust, under Trust Agreement
dated January 17,1995 for $8,075.00 for Johnson County Project FM-
52(34)--55-52
i) Tenant contract with Lyle Buline for $25.00 for Johnson County
Project FM-52(34)--55-52
j) Other
4. Business from the County Sherifire: the following:
Tree, and Oxford for law enforcement services.
b) Other
Business from the Board of Supervisors
a)
b)
c)
d)
Contracts with the following cities: Coralville for communication
services; North Liberty, Hills, Tiffin, Shueyville, Solon, Swish._er, IL~e
mploy "~
Discussion of e ee computer program. ~., ~o
Minutes received
1. Chatham Oaks for February 11, 1998
2. Johnson County Board of Social Welfare/Cluster Board for May,
4th'
3. Johnson County Board of Health for April 22, 1998.
4. Johnson County Conservation Board for April 15, 1998
Discussion of 28 E Agreement establishing the East Central Iowa
Employment and Training Consortium.
Other
6. Business from Administrative Assistant re:
a) Centrex Plus contract with U.S. West Communications. discussion
b) Blue Cross/Blue Shield renewal rates and premiums. discussion
7. Work Session regarding S.E.A.T.S Advisory Committee. Discussion
I)5/ZZ/98 lq:18:33 319-35q-qZ13 -> 31935~58H9 I0~0 CI?¥ CI~ P~§e HHq
Agenda 5-26-98 Page 3
8. 1:30 p.m. - Joint Work Session with Board Health
a)
Presentation from H.B. Calvert, Rural
Midwest Assistance Program (M.A.P) re:
discussion
Development Specialist of
rural development issues.
9. 3:00 p.m. - Meeting with Department Heads
a) Discussion of the following:
1) Report from Communication Committee. (Mike Sullivan)
2) Maintenance of County Facilities and County Abbreviations.
(Graham Dameron)
3) Mileage Reimbursement (Graham Dameron)
4) Reports/updates from County Elected Officials and Department
Heads
5) Other
6) Adjourn
10. Discussion from the public
11. Recess
BS/Zt/gB 13:08:46 319-354-~Z13 -> 319356~09 IOWfi CITY CLERK Page BBZ
Jolmson Count'
Joe Bolkcom, Chairperson
Charles D. Duffy
Jonathan Jordahl
Stephen P. Laeina
Sally SUatsman
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Joint Meeting between the (smaller) Cities of
Johnson County and Johnson County Board of Supervisors
Johnson County Board of Supervisors
Administration Building, Board Meeting Room
913 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Informal Meeting
Agenda
Wednesday, May 27, 1998
1. Call to order 6:30 p.m.
2. Introductions
Presentation from Opal Current, Taxpayer Services Specialist of the Iowa Department
of Revenue and Finance re: overview of Local Option Sales Tax. discussion (This
agenda item was requested by hhe Mayor of Solon)
Business from Roger Stoakes, USDA Rural Development Specialist and John Arthur,
USDA Community Development Manager for Rural Development re: overview of
services. discussion
5. Update of city happenings
6. Discussion re: upcoming problems of various cities and county.
7. Date and time of next meeting.
8. Discussion from fiae public
9. Adjourn
Ir~ageada~ki 99g~05 -27
913 SOU'I~ DUBUQUE ST. P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-6086
Iowa City Police Activity Report
Taylor, Broadway, and Cross Park
A Brief Summary of the Activities Which
Occurred Between May 22 - 25, 1998
Friday 5-22-98
Disturbance/Loud Party - Cedarwood Apts., Warning Issued
Robbery - Pet Degree - Pepperwood Mall, Under Investigation
Disturbance/Loud Party - 2010 Broadway #D Warning Issued
Fight - Econofood - Pepperwood Mall Talked to an individual
Report of subjects hitting cars in lot - Cedarwood Apts. Investigated by officers on foot patrol
Out with subjects - Taylor and Hollywood 2 subjects arrested for public intoxication.
Saturday 5-23-98
Civil dispute - 861 Cross Park Determined to be a civil problem
Disturbance/Loud Party - 2100 Broadway #F Warning Issued
Disturbance/Loud Party - 2100 Broadway #H Warning Issued
Out with subject - 2000 blk. Broadway Subject charged with Open Container and Public
Intoxication
Sunday 5-24-98
Suspicious Activity - 1913 Taylor Subject charged with Public Intoxication, Possession
Under Legal Age, Open container, another subject
charged with Public Intoxication
Suspicious Activity - 945 Cross Park Report of wallet that appeared to have been shot with a
rifle. Billfold recovered no bullet holes.
Suspicious Activity - Broadway and Taylor report of numerous people in area, and cars driving
recklessly Officers arrived and could not locate vehicles driving recklessly.
Fight in Progress - 2100 Broadway Unable to locate anyone fighting.
Intoxicated Pedestrian - 2010 Broadway Arrest made
Monday 5-25-98
No reported activity
Report does not include numerous traffic stops, officers going out on foot patrol, or interviewing
subjects in the area and not generating a case number.
cc: sgt. steffen