HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-27 Bd Comm minutesMINUTES
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
TUESDAY, MAY 28, 1996 - 5:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER - LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Betty Kelly, Sue Licht, Mike Pugh, Doug Russell, John Shaw,
Ginalia Swaim
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Ruedi Kuenzli, Doris Malkmus
STAFF PRESENT:
Scott Kugler
OTHERS PRESENT:
Elizabeth Swenson
CALL TO ORDEI~:
The meeting was called to order at 5:33 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
Russell thanked Kelly for her work on the Historic Preservation Awards Program, and reminded
her to forward the catering bill to First National Bank. Kelly noted that suggestions were
made by members of the audience about how the program may be improved in the future,
including finding a larger facility that can seat more people. Being moved at the last minute
resulted in the room being rather crowded. Russell suggested that Preservation Week be a
topic of discussion at the Commission's annual planning session this fall.
Russell thanked Pugh for his efforts to prepare the HRDP grant application for the Longfellow
Neighborhood survey and National Register nomination.
DISCUSSION OF HRDP GRANT APPLICATIONS:
1. 829 Kirkwood Avenue:
Kugler explained that the Commission's status as a Certified Local Government requires that
it review and comment on all HRDP applications being submitted for properties located within
the corporate limits. Elizabeth Swenson briefly reviewed the grant application that she
prepared for her property at 829 Kirkwood Avenue. She noted some changes to the budget
that would have to be made before a final draft is sent to the state. She noted that the
building was pending listing on the National Register.
Kelly raised concerns about statements in the application suggesting that the Commission
would oversee the project in terms of design review. Russell noted that the building is
pending designation as an Iowa City Historic Landmark, and if designated, the Commission
would review those items that affect the exterior of the building and require a permit.
However, Russell said the grant application should not indicate that the Commission would
be overseeing all aspects of the project. Swenson agreed that those statements should be
rawordeal to more accurately reflect the Commission's role in the project.
Swaim suggested some editorial changes in a few sections. Kelly noted that Plum Grove was
Historic Preservation Commission
May 28, 1996
Page 2
Greek Revival, not Victorian-ltalianate, which should be corrected in the application. Licht
asked for a clarification of the revisions that will be made to the budget. Swenson said the
grant request would be for $16,930, with a cash match of $11,600 and an in-kind match of
$3,750. The grant would basically cover the replacement of the roof, electrical rewiring, and
tuckpointing of the masonry.
MOTION: Pugh moved that e letter be forwarded to the State Historical Society
recommending approval of the proposed grant application, Kelly seconded. The motion
carried on a vote of 6-0.
2. Longfellow Neighborhood Survey and National Register Nomination:
Pugh briefly reviewed the draft application and noted areas where new information was
provided, versus information carried over from previous applications. He noted that this grant
would cover the completion of the Longfellow Neighborhood survey to include Rundell Street,
Dearborn Street, and properties on the west side of Seventh Avenue. It would also include
the preparation of nomination forms to list the proposed Longfellow Historic District on the
National Register.
Russell suggested adding more information about the first survey to better explain why this
area needs to be surveyed. He said the significance of ~he proposed historic district is based
on it being developed as a street car suburb in the early 1900s, but the previous survey area
did not include Rundell Street, where the street car line was located. Pugh said that could
easily be added into the response to question one.
Kelly suggested that the application emphasize that this is a 2Oth century resource. It
contains modest dwellings representative of that period.
Russell suggested that the PIN grant funds being offered by the Longfellow Neighborhood be
explained more clearly by spelling out the acronym and briefly explaining the program and
grant process.
Kelly moved to submit the HRDP grant aPl~icatJon to the State Historical Society of Iowa with
the minor changes discussed abeva. Shaw seconded. _The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
Pugh and Kugler were directed to make the minor changes necessary to the grant application
and submit it to the State by the June 1 deadline.
COMMISSION INFORMATION/DISCUSSION:
Shaw distributed a draft letter from the Commission to the owners of the Park House Hotel,
informing them of grant and loan programs that may be available to assist in the rehabilitation
of the building. The Commission reviewed the letter and directed Shaw to proceed to forward
it to the owners along with any grant or loan application forms that may be applicable.
Russell thanked Shaw for taking his time to collect the information and draft the letter.
Hist(xic Preservation Commission
May 28, 1996
Page 3
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m.
~'m'ed/l~cd/hl~ ~ -28. min
MINUTES
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
JULY 10, 1996
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Jana Egeland, Ken Fearing,
Matt Pacha, Rex Pruess, Allen
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
GUESTS:
Judith Klink,
Stroh
Bruce Maurer, Ross Wilburn
Terry Trueblood, Mike Moran,
Coffin, Marilyn Kriz
Dick Dolezal
Deb Liddell,
Bill Blanchard,
Cindy
FORMAL
ACTION
TAKEN:
Moved by Pacha. seconded by Fearing, to approve the June 190 1996
minutes as written. Unanimous.
Moved by Fearing. seconded by Egeland, to ask the City Council if
it is their intention to allow for the expansion of the City's
cemetery operation. and if the Council wishes to receive a
recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission relative to
this matter. Unanimous.
STATUS
REPORT:
Summer recreation activities status reports were given by Cindy
Coffin (S.P.I. Program), Bill Blanchard (Sports/Wellness), and Mike
Moran (Aquatics, Social/Cultural, Recreation).
NOS
MTGS.:
Commission members indicated which dates they would be available to
attend the upcoming Neighborhood Open Space meetings. Trueblood
stated a schedule would be developed and mailed to each member.
MPAC:
Trueblood reported on the Mercer Park Aquatic Center Expansion
Committee's meeting with the City Council at their work session on
July 1st. The committee met with them to obtain their approval
to enter into an agreement with a professional fund raiser to
complete a feasibility study; a majority of the City Council
me~ers (4 out of 7) gave their approval. A contract has been
entered into with the consultant, and staff will be meeting with
him on July 22nd.
CEMETERY EXPANSION:
Trueblood reviewed past discussions relating to the cemetery
expansion issue for the benefit of the commission members who were
not on the commission at that time, and to apprise members of newly
discovered information. Trueblood pointed out on a map a 3.2 acre
area in Hickory Hill Park abutting the cemetery. He noted it is
unknown whether this area could be used for cemetery expansion due
its terrain. He also pointed out another area for possible
expansion that had been discussed, but it would be necessary to
build a large bridge for access, the slope of the area is greater
than thought, and the cemetery would be_ very close to the existing
shelter in North Hickory Hill Park.
When this issue was previously discussed it appeared both the 40-
acre Woods acquisition and the 39.83-acre Gaulocher property were
dedicated as parkland. Recently, it was discovered that only the
Woods property was officially dedicated as parkland. Trueblood
noted the City Council can dedicate or undedicate parkland as they
see fit. He stated over the next two to three months staff will
put together a list of options and recommendations for the
commission to consider.
Trueblood asked for the commission's feeling on the possibility of
hiring an engineering firm to take a look at the 3.2 acre area to
determine what the feasibility would be of using this area, what
would have to be done as far as earth moving and fill needed, and
estimated cost. He noted this area could give approximately 30
years in terms of lot sales if it can be leveled sufficiently.
Klink felt the commission should 10ok at what the options are
before considering hiring an engineering firm. Trueblood noted
there has been discussions about possibly building a cemetery
jointly with the city of Coralville. Coralville will run out of
cemetery space also if they do not resolve a right-of-way problem.
Trueblood stated after discussing this possibility with the
Coralville City Clerk, it would appear they are not inclined to
build a new cemetery.
Stroh questioned the city's obligation to provide burial ground for
Iowa City residents, asking if the city has to provide lots in
perpetuity. Pruess questioned wha{ the local or national trends
were with respect to burials, asking if the trend is towards
cremations. He noted 30 years could allow for a long term or short
term solution, depending on what people do in the future.
Trueblood indicated staff would investigate this. Pacha requested
that a copy of the Hickory Hill Park guidelines established by the
commission be included in the information packet also.
Dick Dolezal addressed the commission with respect to the cemetery
issue, noting he did not know why it was an issue. He indicated
land which had been purchased with cemetery monies had been allowed
to be used as Darkland. He stated he could not understand the
commission's reasoning in 1995 when they initially discussed this
matter when some members indicated they would not even consider
exploring the possibility of expanding the cemetery into Hickory
Hill Park. He stated this land is dedicated to the cemetery, and
using 3 acres out of 190 acres would not b e missed. He noted there
would be a 300 foot buffer between the 3.2 acre area and the
existing trail in Hickory Hill Park. He stated when the land was
purchased it was never intended to be used as a park, but was
intended for cemetery use when it was needed. Dolezal referred to
a 1979 memo prepared by Billie Hauber to Bob Lee stating within 7
to 10 years the cemetery would run out of space, noting it is now
17 years later. He indicated he had a written statement he would
like to read, which would take approximately six minutes to read.
Liddell stated staff would copy this infofixation to include in next
2
month's commission packet for the commission to review. Trueblood
reminded Mr. Dolezal of the following: 1) when the commission
previously discussed this issue, both the commission and staff were
under the impression the land was dedicated as parkland; 2) the
commission is an advisory board and has therefore can only
recommend policy to the City Council; and 3) the commission voted
their preference, and the City Council makes the final
determination as to what can or cannot be done. Liddell stated she
felt the comment that the land belongs to the cemetery was
erroneous, in ~hat the land belongs to city residents and is owned
by the city of Iowa City. She stated the commission's job is to do
the best by the community in making a sound, long term decision,
with her concern being this may only be a "bandaid" in fixing the
problem for 20 to 30 years. Liddell noted the commission wants to
be more long-sighted, and is hopeful in future discussions open
minds are kept with a vision on a long term solution beyond 30 to
40 years.
COMMISSION TIME:
Klink commented on the Heritage Tree group's excellent work in
putting out the brochures identifying trees in the various
neighborhoods, noting they dovetail with the commission's interest
in developing trails.
Liddell referred to the previous discussion on the cemetery issue,
asking what additional information the commission would like to
receive. Stroh stated he would like to receive a financial summary
on the cost to operate Oakland Cemetery. Pacha questioned whether
this was a fundamental issue as to whether the city of Iowa City
should continue to be in the cemetery business, with Pruess
questioning whether the commission should be making this decision.
Trueblood agreed this needs to be clarified at some point, but
noted that the Oakland Cemetery is a part of the Parks and
Recreation Department, and the commission is to advise on any
matters related to the department. He also noted that cemetery
issues traditionally have not been brought to the commission.
Moved by Fearing, seconded by Egeland, to ask the City Council if
it is their intention to allow for the eKpansion of the City's
gemetery 9peration, and if the Council wishes to receive a
recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission relative to
this matter. Unanimous.
Liddell expressed concern with respect to children playing in the
city plaza fountain, and questioned the progress of the City Plaza
Task Force. Egeland, who is a member of the task force, indicated
it has been some time since they have met.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Trueblood reported on the following:
Soccer Complex Fields. It is very doubtful soccer will be played
on the fields this fall due to the weather conditions preventing
sufficient growth of the overseeded areas and the sewer project
cutting through the north one-half of the property. The goal now
3
is to begin playing soccer on these fields. next spring.
Construction of the north access road will be going out to bid
later this month.
Forestry Division Equipment. At the present time the two largest
pieces of equipment are being moved on weekends from Oakland
Cemetery to City Park to help improve the appearance of the
cemetery to visitors from Friday evening to Monday morning.
Sturgis Ferry Park. Conceptual development plans have been
completed. Airport regulations require a "clear path" with a fence
on both sides, which may eliminate trail access. Staff will be
meeting with the Airport Manager to try to resolve this matter.
C.I.P. Program. The City Council will be reviewing the seven year
C.I.P. program. Four additional projects have been included:
Sturgis Ferry Park development, development of the recent addition
to Wetherby Park, Court Mill/Ralston Creek trail, and additional
monies for development of Kiwanis Park. The City Council may want
the commission to review their previous prioritization.
Moved by Pacha. seconded by Eg~!an~, to adjourn. Unanimous. The
meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
4
MINUTES
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
THURSDAY JULY 18, 1996 - 5:45 P.M.
IOW]% CITY TRANSIT FACILITY
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Howard Horan, Rick Mascari,
Richard Blum
STAFF PRESENT~
Eleanor Dilkes, Ron O'Neil
CALL TO ORDEH=
Chairperson Horan called the meeting to order at 5:50 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING - IOWA CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT:
Horan opened the hearing at 5:51 p.m. There were no comments from
the public. Horan closed the hearing at 5:52 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARING - UNITED STATES ARMY RESERVE~
Horan opened the hearing at 5:53 p.m. O'Neil said the main change
from the lease the Commission agreed to last fall was the term of
the lease. The Commission had agreed to three years and the USAR
wanted a five year lease. There were no ~omments from the public.
Horan closed the hearing at 6:02 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES=
The minutes of the June 13, 1996, meeting were approved as
submitted.
AUTHORIZATION OF EXPENDITURES:
Mascari made a motion to approve the bills. Blum seconded the
motion and it was approved 3 - 0.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA:
Jerry Moon presented information on behalf of the Old Capital
Skaters Alliance. He said the Alliance is looking for a location
to build a skating arena. A feasibility study was conducted and
there is a definite need for a facility in this area. The
Commission said they were interested in receiving more information
about the idea and directed O'Neil to put the item on the agenda
for the August meeting.
Beth Cornelly, from the Iowa City Science Center, said the Science
Center Committee is still very interested in locating a center at
the Airport. She circulated a letter, updating the progress of the
Science Center Building Committee. Horan said this will be an
agenda item at the August meeting.
ITEM8 FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION=
a. Iowa City community School District lease - Blum said he has
a concern about the schedule presented for getting the School
District on track with paying fair market value. During the first
ten years of the lease, the District paid about 1/10 the rent other
tenants were paying. Because of sponsor assurances in IDOT and FAA
grants, Blum thought giving the District another ten years to get
caught up to fair market value was definitely too long. Mascari
agreed with Blum.
Searle said the Des Moines Airport had a problem with the FAA for
an arrangement the Airport had with the Des Moines Schools in which
fair market value was not charged.
Blum recommended deferring the item to negotiate a better schedule
of fees with the School Board. He would like to see correcting the
fee schedule in five years at the most. Blum made a motion for a
resolution for a one year lease with the School District, at a fee
of $ 1500.00. Mascari seconded the motion and at roll call vote,
the motion passed 3 - 0, with Foster being absent. O'Neil will
develop a fee schedule that reflects the Commission's concerns and
contact the School District.
Blum made a
b. USA/~ lease - . motion to defer this item to the
next' meeting. Mascarl seconded the motion and it passed 3 - 0.
O'Neil will contact the USAR and discuss the concerns of the
Commission. The Commission will commit to no more than a three
year lease, with a three year option, and quarterly, as opposed to
annual, payments.
o. Master Plan Study - O'Neil said he had received no written
comments since the public hearing. The comment period closed on
June 27. Searle said the FAA had reviewed the Master Plan and had
sent a letter with several comments. Searle said most of the
comments have already been incorporated into the Plan.
Mascari made a motion for a resolution to accept the 1996 Airport
Master Plan, pending final review by the Federal Aviation
Administration. Bl~m seconded the motion, and at roll call vote,
the motion passed 3 - 0, with Foster being absent.
The Commission commended Jerry Searle on the outstanding job he did
conducting the Master Plan Study. Searle thanked the Commission
for their comments and for the cooperation he received from the
Commission and City staff during the Study.
O'Neil said he had met with Dilkes and other City staff concerning
implementation of the Master Plan. He recommended developing a
scope of services and advertising for a consultant to begin the
process of land and easement acquisitions. If FAA selection
procedures are followed, the Commission could be reimbursed when
funding becomes available.
Blum made a motion to begin the process of hiring a consultant for
land and easement acquisitions as described in the 1996 Master
Plan. Mascari seconded the motion and it passed 3 - O.
· . IDOT grants - O'Neil said the Commission received a grant
from the IDOT for Phase V of the safety fence program, as well as
refurbishing the wind tee and wind sock. State grants are a 70/30
match, with IDOT paying up to $ 10,238.00 for their 70% of the
project. O'Neil said that because he had just received the grant
paperwork, Eleanor had not had the opportunity to review the grant.
Blum made a motion for a resolution to accept the grant from the
IDOT, pending review by the City Attorney's office. Mascari
seconded the motion and at roll call vote, the motion passed 3 - 0,
with Foster being absent.
e. Minimum standards - Blum said he and Mascari have met twice
and reviewed information O'Neil provided them. He said the
subcommittee may be ready to present something to the Commission at
the next meeting.
f. Fly In breakfast - O'Neil said he received an application from
Sertoma to use the Airport for their breakfast event. He said the
events are the same as last year. B1LLm said he did not have enough
help last year to direct aircraft traffic. Mascari said he may be
out of town that week. Blum will see if some of the Jay Cee's will
volunteer to help.
Mascari said he woul~ like to see a display at the breakfast of the
Master Plan and how the Commission plans to develop the Airport.
Blum said a model rocket group would like to come and have a rocket
launch demonstration. Because of safety concerns, it was decided
that they would be invited for a static display only.
h. Self fueling proposal - Jones, from Iowa City Flying Service,
said he is considering installing a self-fueling station for his
aviation fuel. He would like the Co~ission to make some road
improvements near his fuel tank to allow access for the planes.
The Commission said they need more information on the costs and how
soon the increased flowage fee would pay for the improvement. This
will be on the agenda at the August meeting.
i. Snow removal polioy - O'Neil provided some information on
costs of hiring contractors for stand-by to increase the service
level of plowing snow. There was a discussion on what level of
service the Airport should provide and what level of service the
Airport can afford to provide. Mascari will furnish additional
information and this will be an agenda item at the August meeting.
CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT;
Horan reported that, in general, the 4th of July fireworks event
went well. O'Neil said the Jay Cee's did a good job cleaning up.
A fee to cover some Airport costs may have to be charged next year.
COMMISSION MEMBERS~ REPORTS=
Blum said he is encouraged that the Skaters and the Science Center
are interested in locating at the Airport. He said that if they
could be accommodated, it would be beneficial to the Airport.
Mascari said he thought the Jay Cee's did a good job with the 4th
of July event.
Mascari said there is a light at Western World or Paul's that seems
to be pointed upward and is a distraction when landing on Runway
17.
Blum said there was a problem with a construction crane in the
approach to Runway 06. The crane was up at night, the company had
not filed the proper forms with the FAA and the crane was not
lighted. Blum said the Police Department was very helpful in
locating someone from the construction company to lower the crane.
Blum filed a NOTAM and the company said the crane would not be left
up at night.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT~
Dilkes said Smith-Moreland Properties needs a temporary sewer
easement for a piece of property northwest of the Airport. This
will be on the agenda for the next meeting.
O'Neil the subcommittee working on the Airport Aircraft Emergency
Plan will be submitting the plan to the Commission for review
sometime in the next couple of months°
There was a letter in the packet from Dennis Knowling expressing
regret that Con-Ag could not locate their plane in Iowa City.
A summary of FAA grant sponsor assurances was included in the
Commission packet. O'Neil suggested the Commission review it when
they have time.
O'Neil said there are ~everal air space studies being conducted for
proposed construction near the Airport. Several will be considered
obstructions. The Commission should comment and object to any new
obstructions near the Airport.
USGS would like to install a ground water sample well on the
Airport. The Commission said they would have no objections but
would like an assurance the well would be removed when the
Commission was ready to develop that parcel of property.
O'Neil suggested a program be developed to put asphalt or concrete
in the older t-hangars. He said it could be a joint project
between the Commission and the tenants or the Commission and ICFS.
This would have to be budgeted for in FY98.
O'Neil said the Commissioner to fill
Hick's term would be appointed by the
meeting.
the remaining time of Bob
Council at their August 6
SET NEXT MEETING:
The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 15,
p.m.
AD,TOURNMENT:
Blum moved to adjourn the meeting. Mascari
and the meeting adjourned at 8:02 p.m.
Howard Horan, Chairperson
1996, at 5:45
seconded the motion
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR M~ETING
2ND FLOOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
THURSDAY, JULY 25, 1996 - 5:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Staff Present:
Others Present:
Margaret Cox, Stephen Greenleaf, Philip
Hubbard, Mark Martin, Jesse Singerman, Jim
Swaim, Chuck Traw
Mary McMurray, Chuck Traw, Anne Spencer
Barb Black, Maeve Clark, Susan Craig, Larry
Eckholt, Martha Lubaroff, Liz Nichols
Eleanor Dilkes, Assistant City Attorney, Jim
Jacobson, ICON
CA?,L TO ORDER:
Singerman called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.
APPROV~J. OP MInuTeS:
Let the minutes reflect that there was ~'correction in the names
listed as serving on the Director's Evaluation co~uittee. Swaim
was the third member of the committee, not Cox. Minutes approved
as corrected. Greenleaf/Martin
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Buildirtg Project and plans for Se, ptemb~r ~eeting with City
Council. The meeting date is September 4 at 3:00 p.m.. Craig
was uncertain about the location; probably Council Chambers,
perhaps the meeting room at the library. Craig will inform Board
when she has more information. City Manager Arkins is on
vacation and when he returns, Craig, Arkins and Karin Franklin
will meet to discuss format of the meeting. Craig's
understanding is that it will be a facilitated meeting.
JCNews, which is an electronic chat line has had some discussion
concerning the library's building plans and the meeting. Craig's
understanding is that the topic of the meeting is expanded
library space and to reach a consensus with City Council about
how to achieve that aim. Councilmember Baker raised the issue of
library programs and services on this chat line.
The Board's response was that it was not their understanding this
would be a topic for discussion at this scheduled meeting.
Singerman suggested that the Council might need to be reinformed
of the Trustees' responsibilities and the role of the library
Board. The consensus was that this information was something
that should be prepared in advance of the meeting. The Board's
understanding is that the only issue for discussion is the
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
July 25, 1996
PAGE 2
AGENDA ITEM 3A
library expansion. Greenleaf asked how the agenda would be
established. Craig will seek input on the agenda. The Board
discussed their preference for an outside facilitator. Trustees
feel strongly that this is critical and that the facilitator has
an outline of any agenda that we are working with and be well
informed with background information. Craig suggested that David
Smith, our building consultant, might update the 1993 study he
did on space needs. Craig reviewed for the board the type of
information contained in Smith's last report. The critical
section is library space needs and projections. Those sections
refer to building expansion alternatives. Greenleaf suggested
some type of comprehensive report be made available. There was
discussion regarding the possibility of other resource persons
that we could have available? Greenleaf is concerned that
library expansion needs are getting absorbed into a plan for
downtown Iowa City and if so should anyone else be there?
Singerman questioned whether or not David Smith could be present
or perhaps Dan West from CPMI. Martin feels that if library
expansion is to be part of a "downtown" picture, that the Board
needs information too. For example, what land is available, the
status of 64 1 a, plans for CenterSpace, etc. Obtaining figures
from other Iowa libraries that have expanded would be helpful.
The Board agreed that Smith study should. be updated. We will
further review this at the August meeting. The issue of
purchasing real estate is not dead, just on hold.
B. Review board Annual Re~ort
Draft of accomplishments was discussed at last meeting.
Draft of plans for fiscal year 97 was written by Craig. There
were no language changes and this will be sent to the City to
appear in their Annual report and then in the library's annual
report
N~W BUSINESS
A. Strategic Plan Update
This is the second update this year of the progress toward FY96
goals. There were several questions including one about the 3%
of annual salary's figure used for staff development. Craig
reported that this figure was recommended in literature and
reports about personnel development.
The Board requested an objective that describes conm~unications
with the City Council and Library Board; in particular, retaining
language that states that Board and Director report to City
Council quarterly and Board of Supervisors annually. Craig will
add the language to FY97 plans if it is not there.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
July 25, 1996
PAGE 3
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Singerman asked for an update on libraries' Task Force for Public
Relations. Although the library informs people about programs
and events in many ways, the staff is looking at the organization
of our public relations efforts within the organization of the
library in an effort to have a more consistent unified plan.
Trustees are supportive of a plan that consistently gets
information out to the public.
During a discussion about proposed FY98 outreach goals, Craig
responded that she will have info~,L~tion available during FY98
budget talks about costs of parking ramp stamps or bus passes.
This would be a budgetary issue for library. Craig will talk to
the Transit Department and get the information. Martin moved to
accept the Strategic Plan tasks for FY98 and Cox seconded the
motion. All were in favor.
C. Policy Review: Hours
This policy contained language changes incorporating the
additional Sundays and the closing at 5:00 p.m. on Thanksgiving
Eve and Christmas Eve. Singerman passed along a complaint from a
user who wanted us to be open every Sunday. Craig explained that
with the public discussion of the building expansion, it has
become an issue for people. Our hours are very traditional in
libraries in Iowa. Craig will do some research regarding other
Iowa libraries and their Sunday policies This would be a budget
issue. A motion was made to approve the policy by Greenleaf and
seconded by Martin. It passed unanimously.
D. A~rove NOBU Bullget (Non operating budget undesignated)
Crai9 was asked for an explanation re9ardin9 the Buildin9 project
support line. She explained that the library had requested
$40,000 for building planning, support, consultants, construction
management, architects in FY98. It did not 9st included in the
budget submitted to City Council. The library needs to identify
money to be spent for the purposes of design and cost estimating
if needed. Board asked for rephrasing of the line that states
Manager to reflect 'City manager."
There was a question re9ardin9 the temporary loan to the
Development Office. The salary fund was in a deficit. The
Development Office closes their books later than the City, and in
order to temporarily cover a shortfall, a loan was made to that
line item. It will be replaced within one month.
Martin moved to accept the NOBU budget. Swaim seconded the
motion. All were in favor.
STAFF B~PORTS
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
July 25, 1996
PAGE 4
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Better library funding proposal. Craig reported on her
participation on a State Committee called Iowans can't wait.
They have been working for about one year. The Board saw the
second version of the proposal. They recently held a meeting on
the Iowa Communications Network. The goal is to create a system
whereby the State would pay a per capita in support of local
public libraries,$.20, .40, .60 depending on certification. Our
library would receive $.60 and some portion of any contract in
which we would participate. If it were to pass the legislature
and be funded, we would receive about $50,000/year. Craig is
pleased with the process and outcome. She feels that the chances
for this legislative session are not good,although our chances of
getting it in the near future are good. Iowa ranks low in state
support.
County Fair Booth for Johnson Countypublic libraries. The booth
was very popular, containing a gigantic birthday card for
visitors to sign. The card will go on tour to the libraries of
Johnson County. This was a successful joint effort.
Videotape/cablecast August meeting. An objective of our
Strategic Plan calls for videotaping a Board meeting. In August
the Board reviews the annual report. If. there is agreement, we
need to have it in Meeting Room A, and schedule for staff for
telecasting. The Board had no objection to videotaping the
August meeting.
Developmant Office report. Foundation Board approved the new
investment policy. Basic change is that they will move into a
less conservative form of investments with the goal of growing
the investment..
Brad Langguth is the new Foundation Board president. Bill
Burger, Suzanne Summerwill, Brad Langguth, Fred Krause, Dave Van
Dusseldorf, Buffie Tucker, Anne Terrell and Clayton Ringgenberg
are members of the Investment Committee.
Maintenance needs of the building: The packet contained a copy
of a memo to Steve Arkins Re urgent maintenance needs for
building. Arkins has asked for more specific figures. He
indicated that the smaller items could be included as a request
in the capital budget; larger items might be combined in one
package for which the City would sell bonds. The Board was clear
in their desire that this would be a maintenance project and in
no way eliminate our greater need for expansion.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Nominating Co~'~uttittee: On behalf of the committee, Hubbard
reported extreme satisfaction with the performance of Traw during
this critical year. Since this situation continues, the
committee recommends the nomination of Traw as President,
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
July 25, 1996
PAGE 5
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Singerman as Vice President and Cox Secretary. Greenleaf moved
to approve slate. Swaim seconded the motion. All were in favor.
The board went on record with appreciation to Traw for his
efforts this past year.
COMMUNICATIONS:
The packet included a 'feel good" letter from a patron who moved
away.
DISBURSEM]~NTS
Visa for June was reviewed.
Approve disbursements for June. Cox moved approval. Martin
seconded it. All were in favor.
SET AQENDA O~DER POR AU~UST~EETIN~
Review of Annual report
Regularly scheduled review of Finance Policy
Discuss meeting with City Council.
Dinner plans in August.
ADJOURNMENT:
Adjourned after a motion by Cox/Martin at 6:30 p.m.
Minutes taken and transcribed by
Martha Lubaroff
MINUTES
IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
CIVIC CENTER, ENGINEERING CONFERENCE ROOM
CIVIC CENTER, NORTH COURT
JULY 25, 1996
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Lyre Dickerson, Sue Dulek, Michael Kennedy
STAFF PRESENT:
Sylvia Mejia, R.J. Winkelhake, Sarah Holecek, Machale Wiebel
GUESTS PRESENT:
None
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: Commissioners recommended that Council approve
the reserve list for Police Officer.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY MANAGER AND STAFF: Commissioners instructed staff to
conduct the recruitment and testing process for the position of Police Officer.
SUMMARY OF RELEVANT DISCUSSION:
Chairperson Kennedy called the meeting to order at 3:00PM. First item for discussion was the
certification of the reserve list for Police Officer. Mejia noted that there are currently two
openings for police officer, with a possibility for a third, and ILEA has two openings for the
academy available at this time. Kennedy moved and Dickerson seconded the motion to certify
the reserve list.
Winkelhake stated that use of a polygraph test is no longer being considered for the Police
Officer entry test and upon approval of the commission, withdrew the item from the agenda.
Mejia reviewed a memo that had been distributed to the commission regarding the recruitment
for Police Officer. She explained that the testing process would be conducted as it had in the
past, including a written test, physical fitness test, SRA test, MMPI test and oral interviews.
Per ILEA guidelines, the Police Officer Selection Test (POST) would be used for the written
teat. Dickerson commented that the components of the current process appear to provide an
appropriate pool of applicants.. Kennedy agreed and requested that the last paragraph of the
memo be deleted since the request for a polygraph test had been withdrawn. Kennedy moved
and Dickerson seconded the recommended recruitment process for Police Officer.
Commissioners agreed that a discussion of the Police Sergeant promotional process will be
scheduled for a future meeting.
Kennedy moved and Dickerson seconded to adjourn at 3:15PM.
MINUTES - DESIGN REVIEW SPECIAL COMMITTEE MEETING
AUGUST 12,1996 - 4:00 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER - LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Martin Haynes, Karyl Larson, Gary Nagle, Phil Reisetter, Randy
Rohovit, Clara Swan, Daryl Woodson.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Bill Nowysz, Nancy Footner
STAFF PRESENT:
Jeffrey McKinney, David Schoon
OTHERS PRESENT:
Jim Clark, Kim Schmidt, Marty Wink, and Jeff Clark.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Recommended by a vote of 7-0, that the City Council retain the original working of Subsac-
tion D, Application for Design Review, 2b-(2){a) of the Design Review Overlay Zone Ordi-
nalice.
Recommended, by a vote of 7-0, that the membership section of the Committee's by-laws
state that:
The Design Review Committee shall consist of seven (7) members, of which
· two (2) shall be licensed architects;
· two (2) shall be design professionals or involved in the building trades;
· two {2) shall be business or property owners from the area subject to the
Design Review Overly Zone Ordinance, ar~l
· one (1) shall be at-large members of the community.
CALL TO ORDER:
Meeting called to order at 4:12 P.M.
Discussion Reoardino the OrODoSed amendments to the Desion Review Overlay Zone (ODR)
Zonp Ordinance and the Committee Bv-Laws:
Haynes asked the opinion of the Committee regarding the amendment to subsection D of the
Design Review Overlay Zone Ordinance as proposed by Councilor Dee Vanderhoef. This
amendment would require an "extraordinary majority vote or three-fourths (3/4) of the entire
Committee" to disapprove an application. Haynes noted that such an amendment would
make it possible for 2 members to effectively approve an application by requiring 6 of the 7
Committee votes to disapprove an application.
Schoon explained Vanderhoef's reason for this proposed amendment. Venderhoer believes the
claim that Design Review is a very subjective process. Therefore, she believes that requiring
an extraordinary majority vote would convey that the City considers a submitted plan ap-
proved unless the Committee proves otherwise.
Larson asked if a precedent for the super-majority requirement has been set anywhere else
in Iowa City's government. Schoon responded that the idea comes from the rezoning process
that allows for petitions against a rezoning. If such a petition is submitted an extraordinary
majority vote of Council is required to approve rezoning property.
Design Review Special Commit'tee Meeting
August 12, 1996
Page 2
Haynes asserted that, when combined with Vanderhoef's proposal to require two "owners of
street-level businesses from the downtown and the near southside" in the Design Review
Committee composition, the ODR amendment would materialize in two committee members,
presumably with no design experience, given the ability to approve an application. Swan
added that the proposed change to the Committee composition requirements would leave only
four design professionals on a committee designed to be a "professional" committee. She
asked if the possibility exists for non-professional property owners to be represented without
compromising the professional integrity of committee membership
Woodson suggested that as an alternative to the by-law amendment, the Council could select
Committee members from a larger pool of applicants. He added that the extraordinary
majority amendment would take authority away from the Committee. Furthermore, he voiced
his opposition regarding the designation of "street-level" business owners in the proposed by-
law amendment. This would exclude other business owners and property owners from
participation in a process that effects them as much as anyone else. The proposed amend-
ments together would take power away from the entire community and give it to ground floor
business owners.
Nagle said that he opposes both of Vanderhoef's proposed amendments. Specifically, he
believes that the proposed requirements are overly specific and exclusionary. Haynes added
that he prefers to leave the ordinance language as it was originally written. The Committee
has taken steps to make the review process more efficient by operating as a quorum. The
amendment would render a quorum committee ineffective. It was agreed that this is an
important consideration given the fact that a member'i~ absent at nearly every meeting.
Swan stated that the near southside neighborhood will experience the most redevelopment
in the future, so it is important that the interests of the current property owners also be repre-
sented. Schoon mentioned that on the Historic Preservation Commission, all designated
districts have to be represented. The proposed amendment would require that only the
affected areas be represented.
Nagle suggested that the two district representatives could also be required to be design
professionals. Woodson reiterated his desire to have the ground-floor requirement removed.
Schoon stated that an alternative could be that two of the seven members of the original
composition represent the two areas.
4:35: Phil Reisetter arrived.
Swan stated that the Committee is at a disadvantage because they are the last to see the
membership applications. Schoon responded that individual Committee members can find out
the applicant's names and call council members to make suggestions regarding who they
should appoint
Larson stated that, contrary to Vanderhoef's claim, adding non-professionals to the committee
would make the process a more subjective one. Nagle suggested that the amendment
language be changed to generalize that two representatives be chosen from any district in the
overlay zone. Woodson added that you would still lose professionals, but would be compro-
mising for less restrictive language. He also stressed the importance of including owners in
the review process.
Haynes added that the Committee could solicit professionals to fill committee vacancies in an
effort to maintain the professional integrity of the Committee. This strategy would provide
Design Review Special Committee Meeting
August 12, 1996
Page 3
a way to maximize the number of committee professionals while still compromising with the
wishes of the Council.
Woodson moved and Negle seconded to recommend that the Council retain the original
language of Subsaction D, application for Design Review, 2b-{2ila) of the Design Review
Ovaflay Zone Ordinance. The motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
A second motion was made by Nsgle and seconded by Swan to recommend that the member-
ship section of the by-laws state that:
The Design Review Committee shall consist of seven (7) members, of which
® two (2} shall be licensed architects;
· two (2) shall be design professionals or involved in the building trades;
· two (2) shall be business or property owners from the area subject to the
Design Review Overlay Zone Ordinance, and
one (1) shall be at-large members of the community.
The motion was carried by a vote of 7-0.
Haynes officially welcomes new Committee member Daryl Woodson to the Design Review
Committee.
Courtesy Review of DesiQn Plans for 315 E. ColleQe Street.
Jim Clark, Kim Schmidt, Marty Wink, and Jeff Clark arrived at 4:50.
Jim Clark provided the Committee with some background information about the project. The
building would occupy a 185' x 150' lot. There will be a 5' setback from the library lot line
and 20 ft. between the two buildings. There is also a 5' setback on Gilbert St. and a 2'
setback on College St. The design is 3' off of the alley property line in order to avoid existing
power lines with footings in an effort to avoid power outages during construction. The
building will include commercial and residential space with an underground parking garage.
The garage will house 72 parking spaces, to be used as commercial parking during the day
and to possibly serve as tenant parking at night. The design includes handicapped access on
College St. and access to commercial spaces via a covered walkway. It also includes 4
stairwalls and one elevator. The elevator is enclosed in a brick shaft located in the central
corridor. Accent color of the building will be a medium blue and the shingles a neutral gray.
Woodson questioned the fact that the [one handicapped entrance is too far from the opposite
side of the development.
Haynes questioned the buildings height compared to surrounding structures. Schmidt re-
sponded that the building was taller than the adjacent buildings including the church.
Haynes asked how well this design will be received by the prospective commercial tenants
and asked where the signage would be located. Clark responded that most commercial
tenants will be small offices or retail stores. They do not anticipate having any large signs as
the small commercial spaces will not attract any large, retail-type businesses. The signs will
be placed on the storefront windows, not on the front of the building. He added that the
design consists of a concrete structure on the first two levels and covered brick veneer on the
entire building. He stated that these colors are similar to adjacent law offices.
Design Review Special Committee Meeting
August 12, 1996
Page 4
Nagle stated that he does not like the downspouts on the Dubuque St. project, which is of
a similar design. He noted that the colors on that project are not consistent between the brick
and the downspouts. Nagle questioned why the downspouts were not internal to the build-
ing. Clark said it did not work with the internal structure of the building..
Schmidt pointed out that the intention of the shrubbery is to separate the building from the
sidewalk by providing some green space.
Woodson asked if the central corridor is open or if it includes skylights. Clark responded that
it is covered and that the plan includes eight equally spaced openings to be covered by
Plexiglas domes. This corridor will also have brick finish on the exterior walls. Furthermore,
the covering over the central corridor will protect the commercial properties from noise and
trash coming from the residential balconies located above the corridor.
Schmidt added that the large building face on the College St. side will be broken up visually
by the quoins and brick arches protruding 1 1/2 inches from the brick face. This should create
'visual corners" by using shadows. Also, Clark pointed out that they have agreed to take the
4th residential story out of the final design to keep the structure in scale with surrounding
properties. Swan stated that the large facade of the building will create an ominous structure
when located so close to the street.
Haynes asked if they anticipate a problem with security. Clark responded that the design
includes a key operated elevator and considerable lighti.n,g.
Schoon asked how far the commercial space will be up off the street level along Gilbert
Street. Clark replied that the spaces are 6 feet higher than the sidewalk level.
Swan voiced her concern regarding the safety of traffic coming out of the alley, Schmidt
responded that the traffic will have a better view of the street because a three foot setback
was added off the alley.
Woodson explained that he doesn't like the height of the building from the street. He sug-
gested that they open up a wider stairway from the street and create a corner stairway to
make the building more "inviting" to pedestrians. It was agreed that the proposed design set-
up was necessary to facilitate parking. Woodson also questioned the necessity and advantage
of having an archway connection over the walkway. Woodson suggested that money could
be saved by eliminating the arch. Swan replied that she likes the arch, but the stairway up to
it needs to be widened and the lighting should be maximized at this location.
Nagle asked if more of an inset can be made to break up the face. Clark responded that this
would create structural problems and would not be economically feasible.
Jim Clark, Kim Schmidt, Marty Wink, and Jeff Clark left the meeting at 6:00.
Woodson and Nagle agreed that it would have been possible to set the building back further
from the street. The design is based on maximization of available space. The building could
have been designed to look more like townhouses. Nevertheless, the Committee's aesthetic
desires do not match the economics of this project. For example, there are balconies in the
design, but their only reasonable purpose seems to be a way to house the compressors.
Design Review Special Committee Meeting
August 12, 1996
Page 5
Woodson stated that this is an important project because it will set a precedent for future
projects and a message should be sent to future developers. He stated that, "we should draft
a statement that will encourage future efforts to design in harmony with the surroundings",
rather than simply building a 'decorated box", Haynes stated that Clark plans to build what
zoning allows.
Haynes agreed that a letter should be sent that explains, in positive and general terms, the
fact that the Commit'tee feels that the project meets many design principles but that there are
aspects of the design that could be improved. He added that the letter should stress that the
developer has made an effort to be compatible and that this project shows significant im-
provement over the developer's project on Burlington Street.
6:30: Swan leaves.
The general consensus of the Committee was that the Chair should send a memo to the City
Council indicating that the design of the project could be improved in the following areas: 1 )
The relationship between the commercial level and Gilbert Street could be enhanced by having
both at the same level; 2) more relief could be provided to the mass of the building along
College Street; 3) the steps along Gilbert Street could be widened; 4) taller vegetation could
be provided along the Gilbert Street wall; 5} the placement of mechanical equipment and
drainage systems could be improved.
CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 10, 1996:
Woodson moved and Rohovit seconded that the minutes be approved. The motion carried by
a vote of 6-0.
_COMMITTEE DISCUSSION:
Schoon distributed a memo not included in the pre-meeting packet regarding the placement
of the Talbot's sign on the outside face of the Old Capitol Mall.
ADJOURNMENT:
A motion to adjourn was made by Nagle and seconded by Reisetter. The motion carried by
a vote of 6-0. The meeting was adjourned at 6:50.
Minutes submitted by Jeffrey McKinney.