HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-09-16 Info Packet CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
CITY OF IOWA CITY September 16, 2004
www.icgov,org
IP1 Tentative City Council Meetings and Work ~esision Agendas
IP2 Memorandum from the Senior Center Coordinator: Update on Water Damage Resulting
from a Break in the Fire Sprinkler System
IP3 Letter from Director of Planning and Community Development to Ann Wade: Construction of
Buildings on First Avenue
IP4 E-mail from Katherine Parker: Election Day Notification
IP5 E-mail from Bryce V. Plapp to Klm Johnson, Project Coordinator Public Works: Sidewalk
Repair
IP6 E-mail from Andy Johnson to the City Clerk: Annual Meeting for the Board of Directors of
the Housing Trust Fund of Johnson County
IP7 Police Department Use of Force Report August 2004
IP8 Invitation to attend: A Celebration of Centuries ~- Honoring 100 Year Old Businesses and
Century Farms
PRELIMINARY DRAFT/MINUTES
IP9 Board of Adjustment: August 11, 2004
IP10 Parks and Recreation Commission: September' 8, 2004
IPll Charter Review Commission: September 8, 2004
IP12 Historic Preservation Commission: September g, 2004
IP13 Scattered Site Housing Taskforce: August 30, 2004
~ .b ~ 09-16-04
~~={t'~_ City Council Meeting Schedule and
C~T¥ OF ~ow^ C~T~ Work Session Agendas September 15, 2004
www.icgov.org
TENTATIVE FUTURE MEETINGs AND AGENDAS
· MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20 Emma J. HarvatHall
Council Work Session Cancelled
· TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21 Emma J. Harvat Hall
Formal Council Meeting Cancelled
· TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28 Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:30p-8:30p Special Work Session-Alcohol ISsues
· MONDAY, OCTOBER 4 Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:30p Council Work Session
· TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5 Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00p Formal Council Meeting
· MONDAY, OCTOBER 18 Emma J. Hah/at Hall
6:30p Council Work Session
· TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19 Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00p Formal Council Meeting
· MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1 Emma J. HarvatHall
6:30p Council Work Session
· TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2 Emma J. HarvatHall
7:00P Formal Council Meeting
· MONDAY, NOVEMBER 15 Emma J. HarvatHall
6:30p Council Work Session
· TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16 Emma J. HarvatHall
7:00P Formal Council Meeting
· MONDAY, DECEMBER 6 Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:30p Council Work Session
· TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7 Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00P Formal Council Meeting
Meeting dates/times/topics subject to change
FUTURE WORK SESSION ITEMS
Regulation of Downtown Dumpsters
Senior Center
Memorandum
To: City Manager; Mayor and City Council
From: Linda Kopping, Senior Center Coordinat:Or'~;~-e.%~.~..~~
Date: 15 September 2004
Re: Update on Water Damage Resulting from a Break in the Fire Sprinkler
System
Repairs to areas of the Center that were damaged by water when a sprinkler
pipe ruptured on Monday, August 23, 2004, are running smoothly. Fortunately,
quick removal of the water and water-damaged materials along with the
extended use of multiple dehumidifiers limited ~he amount of damage to the
facility.
The necessary demolition has been completed! and repairs are underway. At this
point portions of the walls, flooring, and ceiling ~tiles need to be repaired or
replaced in the kitchen, ceramics room, free standing exercise room, Visiting
Nurse Association suite, and fitness room. This work should be completed within
the next six weeks.
The estimated cost for the repair work is underi$25,000. The insurance carrier
for Iowa Fire Equipment has indicated they will!fund the cost of all repairs.
Cc: Senior Center Commission
Johnson County Board of Supervisors
3
CITY OF IOWA CITY
September 14, 2004 410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826
Ann Wade (3~9) 3s6-sooo
524 North 1st Avenue (319) 356°5009 FAX
Iowa City, IA 52245-3502 www. Jc~ov.or~
Dear Ms. Wade:
Thank you for your letter of September 2® relative tO the construction of buildings on First
Avenue. The properties to which you refer, as well aS your own, were rezoned in 1983 to a
zoning classification which permits, among other uses, single-family, duplex, townhouse and
multi-family development. When your home was built, lthe developer chose to divide the land
into smaller lots that would accommodate the 3-unit structures built there. At the same time, the
land across from you and the land at the corner of RoChester and First Avenue was platted to
create larger lots for multi-family uses. The City CounCil at the time approved the zoning and
the plat. Aisc approved at that time was a lower density zoning and plat for the single-family
houses immediately east of you.
Obviously, the area has developed incrementally with the single-family and your units occurring
first. More recently, the market or the property Owners' wishes have precipitated the
development of the multi-family portion of this area.
The specific structure you refer to at 531-553 First AvenUe is a 14-unit multi-family building. It is
on a piece of land that under the zoning would allow a q6-unit building. Maximum density was
not achieved due to the sensitive areas on the site.
It is likely that development of the lot immediately south of the 14-unit project will also be
constrained by the slopes on the site. To date, we have received no new development plans for
this site. Given the slopes on this property, it is likely a Sensitive areas development plan will be
required which will go through the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council for
approval. If a project is proposed which requires such review, you and your neighbors will be
notified by letter if you are the owners of record of property within 300 feet of the lot. The City
will also post a sign on the property to notify the public that a project is being considered. At that
time you may choose to be part of the deliberations befc~re the Commission and Council.
I understand the disruption this construction brings to your neighborhood and can sympathize
with what you have had to endure as the construction on this site has taken so long. Hopefully,
with full development of the area, these disruptions will Cease and life will settle in as it did when
your side of the street was being developed.
__._Sin, cerel~, ~. ~
~inin'~g & C¢~c m ~velopment
Cc City Manager
u.eff'y Council
09-16-04 I
Marian Karr IP4
From: Katherine Parker [katherine-parker@uiowa.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:58 AM
To: Auditor@pobox.com
Cc: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: procedures for notifying voters of elections and days that we are supposed to go vote
To Whom It May Concern:
Hello,
My name is Katherine Parker, and I moved to Iowa City a little over a
year ago
to study at the University of Iowa. Since that day,i I have come to love
Iowa
City and have recently become a homeowner here.
I came here from Davis, California, another progressive city with a
large
university in its midst. Every time there was an election or ballot
measure,
whether it was a school board election, ballot measures that only
affected
local residents or a Presidential election, the county clerk sent out
information packets to all registered voters via the US Postal Service.
These
packets contained sample ballots and the wording of any ballot measures,
bond
initiatives, or proposed ordinances that were to be voted on. They
arrived far
enough ahead of the voting date that voters could acquaint themselves
with the
issues and cast informed votes.
Since I moved here, I have missed two elections begause nothing arrived
in the
mail and I do not read the Press-Citizen on a daily basis. I think it
should
not be assumed that all registered voters all readithe paper every day
or own a
TV and watch the local government channel. I take my duty as a voter
very
seriously, and it pains me that twice now I have m~ssed the opportunity
to have
a say in how this city is governed because I was not notified that there
was to
be an election.
Please consider changing the way you disseminate ihformation to voters
so that
it reaches ALL registered voters, regardless of whether they read the
Press-
~itizen, the New York Times on-line, or get all their news from the Fox
network. I am somewhat concerned that I will not be receiving any voter
information about the upcoming Presidential election, and I think it is
detrimental to the democratic process not to provide all voters equal
access to
information concerning the date and substantive issues to be voted on
during
any election.
Thank you for your attention,
Katherine Parker
MA/MFA Candidate, Intermedia
School of Art and Art History
the University of Iowa
(319)466-9445
09-16-041P5 I
Marian Karr
From: Bryce V. Plapp [bv-plapp@uiowa.edu]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 10:21 PM
To: kim-johnson@iowa-city.org
Cc: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: sidewalk repair
Dear Ms. Johnson,
I received notice of a cracked sidewalk piece in Hay, and I think that I
sent an e-mail to you about it en Hay 16. The problem is that the
cracked
piece is not en my property, but rather is part of 906 Talwrn Ct. (and
thus
adjacent to my property at 902 Talwrn Ct.). Thus I suggested that you
contact the owner, Jean Hausler, about the repairs So, far the repairs
have net been completed, and I have not heard back from you. (Perhaps
the
e-mail did net go through.}
Sincerely yours,
Bryce Plapp
Bryce V. Plapp, Dept. of Biochemistry, The University of Iowa
4-370 Bewen Science Building, Iowa City IA 52242-1~09
TEL 319-335-7909, FAX 319-335-9570, bv-plapp@uiowa~edu
http://www.biochem.uiowa.edu
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr ~ [e~
From: andy johnson [htfjc@avalon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 9:20 AM
To: marian-karr@iowa-city.org
Subject: Notice of annual meeting
I am sending the attached press release for inclusion in the City Council's packet, if it is not too late. I have also recopied
the press release below.
Thank you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Andy Johnson
Executive Director
Housing Trust Fund of Johnson County
1700 S. First Ave., Suite 25B
Iowa City, Iowa 52245
Phone: 319-358-0212
Fax: 319-358-0053
PRESS RELEASE
The Board of Directors of the Housing Trust Fund of Johnson County will hold its annual meeting on
September 24 at 8:30 AM in the second floor conference mom of the Johnson County Administration Building,
913 S. Dubuque Street in Iowa City. As part of its meetingi the Board will receive public comment on the 2005
Housing Assistance Plan. This document outlines the gaps iin affordable housing in Johnson County and
identifies the priorities the Board will use in distribution of Trust Fund monies. Persons who are interested in
obtaining a copy of the Housing Assistance Plan or who have questions about the Plan may contact HTFJC
Executive Director Andy Johnson at 358-0212.
eSafe scanned this email for malicious content ***
IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders
9/15/2004
PRESS RELEASE
The Board of Directors of the Housing Trust Fund of Johnson County will hold its annual
meeting on September 24 at 8:30 AM in the second floor conference room of the Johnson
County Administration Building, 913 S. Dubuque Slreet in Iowa City. As part of its
meeting, the Board will receive public comment on lhe 2005 Housing Assistance Plan.
This document outlines the gaps in affordable housing in Johnson County and identifies
the priorities the Board will use in distribution of Trust Fund monies. Persons who are
interested in obtaining a copy of the Housing Assistance Plan or who have questions
about the Plan may contact HTFJC Executive Director Andy Johnson at 358-0212.
IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
USE OF FORCE REPORT i ~ [~~
August 2004
OFFICER DATE INC # INCIDENT FORCE USED
19, 48 08-01-04 4-41522 Suspicious Person The subject did not comply with the
officer's request that he place his hands
behind his back. When the officer
grabbed him by the arm he pushed the
officer and attempted to flee. The
officer was able to direct him to the
ground where he continued to straggle
with the officers until he was
handcuffed.
19 08-05-04 4-42155 Warrant Service When the officer approached the
subject to speak with him he fled. The
officer caught him and ordered him to
place his hands behind his back. When
he didn't comply, the officer used a
hands control technique to place his
hands behind his back.
19 08-15-04 4-43674 Warrant Service The subject who was wanted and
known to go armed was ordered to the
ground at gunpoint.
48 08-15-04 4-43693 Assault The subject fled on foot when he saw
the officer approaching. The officer
caught the subject and directed him to
the ground where he continued to resist
until the officer placed him in
handcuffs.
58 08-15-04 4-43734 Figllt The subject, who had been in a fight,
was informed that he was under arrest
and that he should place his hands
behind his back. The subject did not
comply with the officer command and
attempted to flee when the officer
grabbed his wrist. The officer used a
hands control technique to place the
subject's hands behind his back to
handcuff him.
93, 88, 34, 2, 08-17-04 4-44122 Building Search/ The officers made entry to a building
26 Warrant Arrest where they knew a burglary suspect
was hiding. They were also aware that
the subject had an unrelated
outstanding arrest warrant. While
searching the building the officers had
their weapons drawn. When the subject
was located hiding in a closet one of
OFFICER DATE INC # INCIDENT FORCE USED
the officers pinned him to the floor
until he was handcuffed.
93 08-18-04 4-44465 Escape The officer located a juvenile who had
just fled from his probation officer.
The officer verbally and physically
directed him to the ground where he
was handcuffed.
11 08-18-04 4-44509 Disorderly Conduct The subject, who was under arrest,
became aggressive towards the officer
who then directed him to the floor
where he continued to resist until he
was handcuffed.
9, 6 08-20-04 4-44804 PAULA/Open When the officer attempted to stop an
Container individual with an open beer the subject
tried to pull away from the officer.
While being handcuffed by the officer
the subject attempted to flee but was
directed to the ground where he
continued to resist until officers could
get handcuffs on him.
34 08-24-04 4-45911 Suicidal SUbject The officer responded to assist
ambulance crews with a subject who
was threatening to kill himself. He
refused to get in the ambulance and
struggled with the officer who then
placed him in handcuffs. While at the
hospital he made several attempts to
leave and had to be held down until his
medications took affect.
4 08-29-04 4-47091 Indecent C~)nduct As the officer approached the subject to
speak with him about urinating in
public he attempted to flee. The officer
caught him and directed him to the
ground where he continued to resist
until he was handcuffed.
CC: City Manager, Chief, Captains, Lieutenants, Training sergeant, City Clerk, Library
IP8
You are cordially invited to attend / Senior Center
A Celebration of Centuries
· ,~ ~' 'J; 7,04'¢'~'~: ''~'~' ~,~r2~
Friday, September 24
Honor,ng 100 Year Old Bus,nesses
Century Farms
· 8:30 - 10 30 AM - Table displays of your
business or Century Farm
· 9:30- Comments from new UI Provost
Michael Hogan
· 2:30- Public reception honoring 100 year
old businesses & Century Farms * Speakers ~ I~ ~~
· Live entertainment * Refreshments *
· Contact Julie Seal at 356-5222 orjulie-
seal@iowa-city.erg to reserve your table
display at the Celebration of Centuries!
Thanks to Hills Bank and the Senior Center
2004 Commemorative ~ost Card
Postal Center to Senior Center: 100 Years at 28 South Linn Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
Iowa City Mail Carder, Circa 1930
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
IOWA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
AUGUST 11, 2004- 5 PM
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL - IOWA CITY, CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Carol Alexander, Vincent Maurer, Dennis Keitel, Karen Leigh, Michael Wright.
STAFF PRESENT: Robert Miklo, Tokey Boswell (Planning Intern), Sarah Holecek
OTHERS PRESENT: Valerie Russell, Bushra Sulierean, Dilek Ince, Paul Hoherz, David Ryan,
Warren Duffy, Karen Sheldon
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Keitel called the meeting to order at 5:02 PM
CONSIDERATION OF THE JULY 14, 2004 BOARD MINU~ES
Chairperson Keitel accepted a motion to approve the minutes from July 14.
MOTION: Maurer moved to approve the minutes from JUly 14. Alexander seconded the motion.
Keitel pointed out a mistake on page fourteen, line nine, am extra letter that should be removed. Wright
mentioned that on page twelve, there is a name mistakenly spelled. Instead of Joyce Baker, it should be
Joyce Barker.
Motion carried 5-0.
SPECIAL EXCEPTION(S)
EXC04-00006
Public hearing regarding an application submitted by Vale!ie Russell for a special exception to permit a
commercial child care center for up to 24 children in the LOw Density Single-Family (RS-5) zone located
at 735 Westgate Street.
Before Miklo began the staff report, he showed slides with lLhe house in question, and the location of the
property. He stated that the applicant, Valerie Russell, isi requesting a special exception to allow the
establishment of a childcare center in a Low-Density Single Famdy Residential, RS-5, zone. Ms. Russell
currently operates a childcare home from 735 Westgate street. Miklo explained that a childcare home is a
home-based facility that provides daycare for a maximumi of 16 children in a residence. On the other
hand, a childcare center is a nonresidential daycare facility fOr 12 or more children. The maximum number
of children for childcare centers depends on the size of the facility and available parking spaces. Miklo
mentioned that the initial application, submitted in March was requesting approval for up to 65 children.
The original application did not provide the required parkir~g spaces. He said that in July the applicant
submitted a revised site plan showing 4 parking spaces, which would allow for the care of up to 24
children at any one time. Miklo mentioned that if the speciali exception were approved, Ms. Russell would
move out of the house and convert the entire structure into a commercial childcare center.
Miklo said that there are a number of specific standards that should be met, for the special exception to
be approved. The center should provide a fenced outdoor ~lay area of not less than 100 square feet per
child using the area at any given time. Miklo noted that there is currently a fenced outdoor play area of
approximately 5,330 square feet, which would be more than adequate to meet the standard of 2,400
square feet required for 24 children. He mentioned that no]playground equipment should be in the front
and side yards, and that in this specific case, all playgroun~l equipment is located within the fenced play
area in the rear yard. Miklo added that all play areas shoul~J be enclosed or protected, well drained, free
from hazards, and readily accessible to the center. He mentioned that the fenced play area is located in
the rear yard directly adjacent to the house, and therefore it !s readily accessible to the center. The yard is
enclosed with a 4-foot high chain link fence and it is free from hazards. He said that the property is
adjacent to the creek, but the yard slopes gently towards the west and therefore is well-drained.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11,2004
Page 2
Alexander asked if the creek could be showed on the map.i Miklo showed the location of the creek, up to
the north. He mentioned that the property close to the creek is not a residential lot, and there is where the
creek bed is located for the most part. Keitel asked if that iS owned by the City. Miklo answered that he is
not sure who owns that lot, but he thinks that it might be the! property of a Home Owners' Association.
Miklo continued the staff report saying that the center musi contain at least 35 square feet of accessible,
usable interior floor space per child, excluding kitchens, ba!hrooms and halls. He noted that the childcare
center will have 1,875 square feet of usable interior spaCe, excluding kitchens, bathrooms and halls,
which is more than adequate to meet the 840 square feet required for 24 children. He said that the drop-
off/pick-up area for the center should be designed to allow sufficient stacking spaces located in proximity
to the center's entrance. The separation of pedestrian access and vehicular traffic is encouraged to
minimize the extent to which children are required 1o walk,across drives or roads to gain access to the
child care center. Miklo mentioned that the applicant is prol~osing to change the use of this property from
residential to institutional. He said that childcare centers ;require one off-street parking space per six
children in addition to one stacking space per 20 children. Furthermore, in R zones, no parking is allowed
in the front yard. There are currently two parking spaces Ibcated in the garage, which may be counted
towards the required parking. The applicant is proposing tb construct two additional parking spaces on
the north side of the existing house for a total of four spaceS. With four parking spaces, up to 24 children
may be cared for at this center at any given time. The driveWaY and garage location will allow for children
to be dropped off in an area where they will not have to walk across drives to reach the door of the child
care center. The proposed parking spaces on the north side of the building are less convenient and are
more appropriate for employee parking, Miklo stated.
Finally, Miklo said that this facility must be licensed to ol~erate, and in order to be licensed all State
requirements must be met; the State is still in the process o¢ examining the childcare center application.
Presenting the General Standards, Miklo said that the specific proposed exception should not be
detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfCrt or general welfare. During the three years
that the applicant has operated a childcare home, the City has not received any complaints regarding
noise, traffic or other issues that may be detrimental to public health, safety, comfort or welfare of the
neighborhood. Although the proposed special exception will result in an increase in activities on this
property, in staff's opinion the increase from 16 children to 24 children is not likely to have a significant
effect.
Miklo stated that the proposed exception should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity and will not substantia!ly diminish or impair property values in the
neighborhood. He mentioned that the current childcare home is located in the Low-Density Single Family
(RS-5) zone. The noise generated by a childcare center has the potential to negatively impact the
adjacent six properties that have rear yards abutting the area where the outdoor play area is located. Any
negative impacts of the childcare facility appear to be mitigated in part by the large rear yards of these
properties and the separation of three of these properties frbm the play area by the Willow Creek stream
corridor. To date there have been no complaints from neig!hbors regarding the existing childcare home.
Moreover, because the proposed center operates only during working hours, it is less likely to be
detrimental to the enjoyment of adjacent properties.
Miklo reminded the Board that if this special exception woulld be approved the existing residence will be
converted entirely into a childcare center. To assure the appearance of the property remains compatible
with the surrounding residential neighborhood, staff recommends that the building be required to retain its
residential exterior appearance.
Miklo continued by saying that the establishment of the specific proposed exception should not impede
the normal and orderly development and improvement of tl~e surrounding property for uses permitted in
the zone in which such property is located. The adjacerlt properties have already been developed,
therefore this special exception would not be contrary to this standard. He said that adequate utilities,
access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities should be provided. Westgate Street is a collector
street that is terminated by two arterials, Melrose Avenue to the north and Benton Street to the south.
Miklo said this provides good vehicular access to the proposed childcare center. This property was
developed relatively recently (2000) and therefore has ade~luate utilities and services. The applicant will
be required to construct two additional parking spaces on the north side of the house.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11,2004
Page 3
Miklo said that adequate measures should be taken to provide ingress or egress designed to minimize
traffic congestion on public streets. In addition to the two! parking spaces available in the garage, the
applicant will build two parking spaces north of the house. This will require a second driveway on the
Westgate Street. He mentioned that grading work may be necessary to install the two spaces and
driveway.
Miklo said that except for the specific regulations and Standards applicable to the exception being
considered, the specific exception, in all other respectsi conforms to the applicable regulations or
standards of the zone in which it is located. He stated that lhe construction of this house was completed
in 2000 and conforms with applicable regulations and standards of the RS-5 zone. The applicant will need
to obtain a building permit to convert the building from a residential use to a childcare center. He noted
that some building upgrades may be required by the Building Code.
Next, Miklo said that the proposed use should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, as
amended. The childcare facility provides an essential service to the neighborhood. Conversion of the
childcare home to a childcare center will allow the applicator to care for additional children, including an
after-school program for children from Weber and Horn el!ementary schools. The Comprehensive Plan
supports coordinated efforts to provide safe and reliable Childcare. He added that this proposal is not
contrary to any land use goals and objectives of the Cor~prehensive Plan or Southwest District Plan.
Given the center's location on a collector street with an iadjacent religious institution and multifamily
residential uses, staff feels that the proposed childcare cen~er for up to 24 children is compatible with the
neighborhood and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recommends approval of this special exception to allow the establishment of a childcare center for
up to 24 children at any one time provided two additional I~arking spaces are provided per City code, a
building permit for the change of use from residential to childcare center is approved and that the building
retains its exterior residential appearance.
Leigh asked if the garage spaces are considered off street parking spaces. Miklo answered that in this
specific case they count toward the number of off-street parl~ing spaces needed.
Keitel noted that the Board received correspondence in supl~ort and in opposition of the application.
Public Hearing Opened
Valerie Russell, 735 Westgate Street, said that she has been a ohildcare provider for 30 years, and a
licensed teacher for 12 years. She started her business in 2000. Before that, she was an early childhood
education teacher, a kindergarten teacher, and a first grade ieacher for the School District of Kansas City,
Missouri. She mentioned that for eight years she successfully managed 22 children in her classes.
Russell said that she presented the Board of Adjustment eight letters of recommendation. She also
mentioned that she brought more letters from her neighbors;
Russell stated that more parents would like to enroll their children in her Iowa City Early Childhood
Education and Childcare program, and that she currently has a waiting list. She mentioned that in March
2004 she went door to door, and talked to almost all of her neighbors. She said that no one said anything
against her idea of expanding her child care business; instead, she mentioned that many neighbors gave
her compliments about her current business. Russell said!that 12 children from the two block area in
which she resides have attended and benefited from her services.
Russell mentioned that one neighbor, Paul Hoherz, expressed his concern to her about the extension of
the program. She mentioned that he also signed a letter asking that the application for special exception
be denied. Russell said that she would like to address some of his Hoherz's concerns. She stated that
Paul said that she is doing a phenomenal job with the fourteen kids enrolled, that she is keeping her
property looking nice, and that her present business has not negatively affected him. However, Russell
added, Hoherz fears that she will sell the house to someone~else and that those new owners will trash out
the place. Russell reassured anyone concerned that she does not have any intention of selling her house.
Accordingly, she mentioned that she does not intend to t~ave anyone taking over her business. She
stated that she loves her job as a teacher, which not only helps her support herself, but it also helps her
to financially aid her daughter who is attending the University' of Iowa.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11, 2004
Page 4
Russell said that in the letter sent by Hoherz, he and some other neighbors expressed their concern
about the Willow Creek issue. She said that before she I~ought the house she asked many neighbors
about the possibility of the creek overflowing, and thati they all answered that the water had not
overflowed in 30 years. Russell mentioned that she also asked Randy Stevens, her State Farm Insurance
agent, if the property was in a flood zone, and he answered ithat it was not.
Russell said that the same letter from the neighbors stated that more children playing in, or near the creek
are unacceptable and not safe. Russell stated that none ~f the children from her business have ever
played near, or in the creek. She said that there is a chain fence surrounding her backyard. She added
that the same letter states that noise, and traffic in the regipn will increase. Russell clarified that none of
the neighbors who signed the letter live on the Westgate Street.
Russell asked the permission of the Board to read some of the letters sent by her neighbors. She started
with a letter sent by Dr. Thomas Walz, 1 Westgate Avenue. In his letter, Dr. Walz said that he is both a
neighbor of Ms. Russell, and a sponsor of a grandchild in her program. He stated that Ms. Russell is a
very caring and careful professional. He wrote that he is very supportive of allowing Ms. Russell to
expand her service, especially since his granddaughter was kept on a waiting list because the program
was so limited in size.
Next, Russell presented a letter sent by Mary Irwin, 5 Wes~gate Circle. Irwin wrote that she believes that
Ms. Russell maintains a necessary service and should contii~ue it.
Russell presented another letter sent by Dilek Ince. Ince wrote that her child attends Early Learners'
Enrichment since January 2004. She mentioned that she and her husband are both physicians at the
University of Iowa Clinics and Hospitals, and that they hardly found a care center with less strict schedule.
She added that her daughter did not know English when !she was first enrolled, but she learned very
quickly, and she begun to read simple words at the age of 3 ½. Ince also wrote that Ms. Russell is an
excellent teacher, who makes learning a fun experience for kids.
Another letter was sent by Dr. Dogar, 600 Westgate Street. Dr. Dogar wrote that Ms. Russell has been a
wonderful teacher for their children for the last two years. He believes that other children could benefit
from Ms. Russell's program. The business location is very cbnvenient, and there has not been any kind of
trouble. Dogar added that he believes that allowing more c~hildren to enroll will be a great benefit for the
community and it will also help Ms. Russell.
Russell mentioned that if the special exception would be approved the only change to the outside
appearance of her house would be a single line drivewayOh the north side, which would provide two off-
street parking places. Russell mentioned that her neighbo~ts told her that her business does not bother
them or affect them in any negative way. During the past 2 ~/ears, twelve children from the two-block area
have attended her program. Russell stated that her business is compatible with the Iowa City long term
Comprehensive Plan.
Bushra Sulieman, said that one year ago his daughter Madeena joined the program. He mentioned that
he was very insistent that his daughter would not forget ,Arabic, their native language. He said that he
addressed that concern to Ms. Russell, and she assured him that this should not be a problem. He added
that Madeena learned English, and she maintained Arabic. ISulieman said that his son, who is two years
old is supposed to join the program if the application would I~e approved.
Dilek Ince, said that her daughter started to attend Early Learners' Enrichment in January 2004. She
mentioned that she and her husband are both physicians at the University of Iowa Clinics and Hospitals,
and that they hardly found a care center with less strict schedule. She added that her daughter did not
know any English when she was first enrolled, but she learned very quickly, and she begun to read
simple words at the age of 3 ¼. She said that they are very !happy with the program, and that Ms. Russell
is a great teacher, very meticulous in everything she does.
Paul Hoherz, 724 Wheaton Road, said that all the water that drains from Westgate Street, Westgate
apartments, and Emerald Street dump into the street gutters, and the gutters empty into the creek. He
mentioned that the fence where Ms. Russell has the play area is about 5 feet from this creek area; it does
not flood, but it got very close. The new proposal of the parking lot, he said, needs a retention wall to hold
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11, 2004
Page 5
it. There will be a lot of concrete. He mentioned that he had water on his lot several times during heavy
rain. He stated that the gutter could not handle it.
Hoherz mentioned that the traffic on the street is solid. HD said that if there will be 24 children in the
program, there would have to be one car that will drop and pick up each kid every day. The more children
you have, the more cars you are going to have, he said. There is a fairly quick traffic when students come
back; the police knows about it because they installed radars. Hoherz said that he heard reports saying
that Ms. Russell would have 46 different children which would come during the course of the week for an
hour, or according to the parents' need. He mentioned that! there would be parents coming and going all
the time.
Hoherz said that his major concern is the water situation. He said that he doesn't think that someone can
dump water from a driveway and a parking lot into the creek without causing trouble. He mentioned that
his lot is on the other side of the creek, and he keeps it onl~ for flowers, vegetable garden and trees. The
parking lot is going to dump either in her back yard, or in the creek, he said.
Hoherz said that he is concerned about transforming a residential house into a commercial venue. He
mentioned that Ms. Russell will move out if the special exception is approved, and he asks whether she
could also rent the house to students during the night. He added that it will be a commercial building, and
therefore someone could do anything.
Hohrez stated that the kids in the program do not bother him. He said that Ms. Russell keeps them in the
house most of the time. He noted that the drop off and pickrup are his concern, because it is a very busy
street and the number of vehicles on that street would increase.
David Ryan, 730 Wheaton Road, said that Ms. Russell is a igreat teacher. He mentioned that his concern
is transforming a residential house into a commercial venuei He asked whether there is a limit in time that
those children could be there. He said that his backyard is a~djacent to hers, and the noise travels. He said
that the noise does not bother him currently; his wife car~ies a similar business with four children. He
added that he is worried about weekends, nights, which would directly affect their lives.
Warren Duff,/, 818 Keswick Drive, said that he lived in the area for fourteen years, and that the creek
does overflow when it rains heavy. He mentioned that he cares about the safety of the children, and also,
about the traffic in the area which he considers terrible.
Public Hearin,q Closed
MOTION: Leigh moved for the approval of EXC04-000D6 regarding an application submitted by
Valerie Russell for a special exception to permit a commercial child care center for up to 24
children in the Low Density Single-Family (RS-S) zone located at 735 Westgate Street provided
that two additional parking spaces are provided per City code, a building permit for the change of
use from residential to childcare center is approved and that the building retains its exterior
residential appearance.
Alexander seconded the motion.
Public Hearing Reopened
Alexander asked Ms. Russell to try to clarify some of the neighbors concerns regarding the schedule of
the center, and the number of children that she would have.
Russell said that she does not plan to be open during Saturdays or Sundays. She mentioned that she
needs those days for personal reasons like visiting with her daughter, who is a student at the University of
Iowa. She said that she does not want to be open after 5:30~ PM. She noted that she would prefer to close
at 5 pm, but that some parents need that half hour schedule extension. Russell said that she does not
plan to be open during evening.
Maurer asked whether there would be children coming and going all the time, thus increasing the overall
number of children enrolled, but maintaining the requirement of having just 24 children at any one time.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11,2004
Page 6
Russell answered that that is not the case. She mentionedithat there are a few children enrolled for half
days, however most of the parents on the waiting list w~uld be interesting in full time care for their
children. Russell said that she does not believe that the traffic on Westgate is bad, and she thinks that
there are enough parking spaces. She noted that there is Also a bus route, which is in the advantage of
parents who would like to bring their children by bus.
Hoherz said that in 1980 he bought both sides of the creeks. He said that he did not want to maintain the
area for houses, so he sold half of it for one dollar. He said that the City told him that the area is on the
flood plain, and could not be used for building, however, he mentioned that when the City got the lot, it
became construable and Russell's house was built.
Miklo clarified that the lot at 735 Westgate Street is not in the floodplain area; however, some of the other
houses might have floodplain area. He also said that Ms. Russell mentioned that she does not want to
operate after 5:30 PM, and that if the Board is concerned about this, they can put a limitation regarding
the hours of operation.
Public Hearing Closed
MOTION: Leigh made a motion to amend regarding the hours of operation, limiting them to 6AM to
6PM, Monday through Friday.
Alexander seconded the amendment.
The motion passed with a vote of 5-0.
Alexander said that she was concerned when the application was submitted requiring 65 children,
however, the new plan is acceptable, and she will vote ir~ favor. Alexander stated that the playground
area is adequate, the playground equipment is located ~vithin the fenced yard, the interior space is
adequate, the drop-off/pick-up area requirements have been addressed, and the center's operation and
maintenance should meet all State requirements. Alexander said that it would not be detrimental to or
endanger the public health, safety, comfort or general welfare, would not be injurious to the use and
enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity and will not substantially diminish or impair property
values in the neighborhood, and it would not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of the surrounding property. She said that the property has adequate utilities and services,
adequate measures would be taken to provide ingress or egress designed to minimize traffic congestion
on public streets. The applicant has to get a building permit for the change of use from residential to
childcare center, and the childcare facility provides an essential service to the neighborhood.
Maurer stated that he would also vote in favor for the reasons already given.
Keitel stated that he would also vote in favor for the reaSons already stated. He pointed out that the
square footage is more than adequate for 24 children.
Leigh will vote in favor of the motion for the previously mentioned roasons.
Wright will also vote in favor for the reasons already stated.
EXC04-00018
Public hearing regarding an application submitted by Karen~Sheldon for a special exception to reduce the
required front yard adjacent to 5th Avenue from 20 feet to z(~ro feet for property located in the Low Density
Single- Family Residential (RS-5) zone located at 1906 G Street.
Before starting the staff report, Boswell presented a slide show with the area and the house in this case.
He said that the residence is located at the corner of G Street and 5th Avenue in southeast Iowa City in an
RS-5 zone. The property is a narrow, nonconforming corner lot, and the street right-of-way on both
frontages is much wider than is currently required for a residential street. The southern front yard
measures 20 feet from the house to the property line along the G Street right-of-way, but the western
front yard setback along the 5t' Avenue right-of-way (ROW) is only nine feet wide, and is therefore
already non-conforming to the current zoning code. The rear and side yards, which abut an alley and a
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11,2004
Page 7
neighboring property, are conforming. Boswell mentioned that the applicant wishes to put an addition to
the house in the western front yard, which would allow e~pansion of the kitchen and dining area, the
addition of a deck off the kitchen. He said that the proposed structure is nine feet wide, which would be
right at the property line. Under the zoning code no erllargements or alterations that increase the
nonconformity of nonconforming structures are allowed; therefore the applicant seeks a special exception
to the front yard setback requirement that would make the structure conforming and allow the addition.
Boswell said that subsection 6Q-4-B of the Zoning Chapter states that a special exception may be
granted by the Board of Adjustment modifying yard requirements when the owner or lawful occupant of
property demonstrates that such person's situation is peculliar to the property in question, that there is a
practical difficulty in complying with the dimensional requirements of the Chapter, and that the conditions
of Article W of the Zoning Chapter can be met.
Boswell stated that the applicant has a small lot for the RS-5 zone. Dimensional requirements for RS-5
zone are 8,000 square feet of lot and a minimum lot width Of 60 feet. He said that this particular property
measures 40 feet wide by 150 feet long, and is therefore nonconforming in both width and overall area.
There are several other lots of this size in the neighborhood, but they are all interior lots. He mentioned
that this property is a corner and this complicates the size!problems because there are two front yards,
which normally require twenty-foot setbacks. Further, there is an abnormally large street ROW in this
area. In Staff's opinion, this combination of factors is a uniqLie situation.
G Street, as Boswell mentioned, has a 66-foot ROW, and 5th Avenue has a 75-foot ROW. In contrast,
local residential street ROW under the current subdivision Ordinance is required to be only fifty feet wide.
He said that it is even more peculiar that with a ROW this large, there are no city services located in the
right-of-way. Neither sanitary sewer, nor storm sewer, nor wlater mains are located along this portion of 5th
Avenue. He added that there is no sidewalk in the 5th Avehue ROW. Thus, even though the applicant's
home is only nine feet from her property line, there is 34 feet of open space between the near curb and
the foundation of the house. Even after nine-foot addition, there would be 25 feet of yard area between
the home and the street. Boswell stated that this area of IoWa City is fully developed, and no expansion of
utilities or services is expected in the neighborhood. Even so, the resulting area is more than enough to
assure adequate space for any future sidewalks or necessary infrastructure. It is rare for primary
structures to be allowed on the property line, but there are ether homes in the neighborhood that abut the
public right-of-way. In particular, the home directly south of the applicant's is situated no more than one
foot away from the 5~h Avenue ROW.
Boswell said that due to the current non-conformity of the yard requirement, Ms Sheldon will be precluded
from adding any addition to this portion of her house witho~lt a special exception. He added that the north
yard is large enough to contain an addition without violation of the yard requirement, however an addition
to the rear of the house is not practical to meet the desires of the applicant. Boswell stated that an
attached garage separates the living areas of the house from the rest of the lot to the north. He said that
as the purpose of the addition is to expand and create more room to maneuver in the dinning room and
kitchen, an expansion to the rear of the house would not be useful. He added that in Staff's opinion, there
is a practical difficulty in complying with the 20-foot setbackl
Presenting the general standards, Boswell said that Staff considers that the proposed exception will have
very limited affects on public health, safety, comfort and Welfare. He said that the addition is small and
would be at least 25' from the curb. He added that sight distance would not be affected for vehicles on
either 5t~ Avenue or G Street. The large public ROW and the amount of open space in the front and rear
of the property will limit any negative effects.
Boswell said that the addition, as proposed, will be statistically similar to the original structure and small.
The addition will not directly affect use or enjoyment of nei~ghboring properties. He stated that Staff does
not feel that the proposed alteration will substantially alter the neighborhood. Boswell said that many
homes in the neighborhood have larger front yards than the resulting area, but the yards along 5th Avenue
vary to a great extent. The house across G Street, has a setback similar to that proposed for this
particular parcel. He stated that Staff finds that neighboring property should not be affected. He added
that the proposed exception will not increase the population density or affect the use of municipal
facilities. He said that adequate facilities exist to serve tt~e addition and no change in the ingress or
egress is proposed.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11,2004
Page 8
Boswell mentioned that the parcel will still be nonconforming in some respects; the lot is narrower than
required in the RS-5 zone, and lacks the required square footage. He said that this special exception
would allow the entire structure with frontage along 5th Aver~ue to become conforming with the respect to
the yard requirement. Boswell stated that Staff finds that !he exception and renovation conform to the
City's Comprehensive Plan, which calls for preservation Df the existing housing stock in the Central
Planning District.
In summary, Boswell said that given the peculiar situation and the difficulty in complying with the setback
requirement in this case, justice may be served by granting the request. The necessity for special
exception is due to the unique size of this corner lot whic~h creates a practical difficulty in locating the
living spaces. The addition would allow the applicant glreater use of her property, and impact on
neighboring uses would be minimal. He said that the elevation drawings submitted to Staff appear to be in
keeping with the neighborhood. Staff feels that given the limited options available to the applicant,
granting a special exception to the yard requirement is just.
Boswell stated that Staff recommends that EXC04-00018, an application to reduce the required front yard
adjacent to 5TM Avenue from 20 feet to zero feet and 9 fee! in the areas indicated on the site plan for a
single-family home in the Iow-density single-family residential zone, be approved, subject to general
conformance with the elevation drawings and site plans submitted to the Planning and Community
Development department on July 12, 2004.
Keitel asked if a future sidewalk is planned on being constructed there. Boswell answered that currently
there are no plans for a sidewalk but the City engineer said that this is an option. He said that 25 feet of
open space is adequate for a 6-foot sidewalk.
Public hearing opened
Karen Sheldon, 1906 G Street, said that they do not have much room in the kitchen. She mentioned that
her co-owner has a back injury, and might have to use a Wheelchair, and the approval of the application
will open the space. She said that this will be conforming wilh the other properties and the neighborhood.
Keitel asked if the City asked anything about the rock garden on the corner, which is in the City ROW.
Sheldon said no and said that all the neighbors have sometl~ing similar in their corners.
Public Hearing Closed
MOTION: Wright moved for the approval of EXC04-001~18, an application to reduce the required
front yard adjacent to 5th Avenue from 20 feet to zero feet and 9 feet in the areas indicated on the
site plan for a single-family home in the Iow-density!single-family residential zone, subject to
general conformance with the elevation drawings and! site plans submitted to the Planning and
Community Development department on July 12, 2004.
Leigh seconded the motion. The motion passed with a Vote of 5-0.
Maurer said that he would vote in favor of the application. He said that it will not be detrimental or to
endanger public health safety, comfod, or general welfare, it will not be injurious to the use or enjoyment
of other properties in immediate vicinity, it would not impede the normal and orderly development and
improvement of the surrounding property. He said that the property has adequate utilities and services,
adequate measures would be taken to provide ingress or egress, and the proposal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Keitel stated that he would also vote in favor for the reason~ already stated.
Alexander said this is clearly a unique lot configuration and there is practical difficulty complying with the
setback requirements. She will vote in favor of the motion for the previously mentioned reasons.
Wright will also vote in favor for the reasons already stated.
Leigh stated that he would also vote in favor for the reasons already given.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August 11,2004
Page 9
OTHER
NONE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT INFORMATION
NONE
ADJOURNMENT
Alexander moved to adjourn; Maurer seconded. ']'he meeting adjourned at 6:30 PM
Board Chairperson Board Secretary
Minutes submitted by Bogdana Rus
s:/pcd/minutes/boa/2OO4/boa08-11-04.doc
Iowa City Board of Adjustment Minutes
August11,2004
Page 10
Board of Adjustment
Attendance Record
2004
Term
Name Expires 01/14 02/11 03/10 04/14 05/12 06/09 07/14 08/11 09/08 10/13 11/10 12/08
Carol Alexander 01/01/08 NM X × × NM X X X
Dennis Keitel 01/01/05 NM X X X NM X O X
Karen Leigh 01/01/07 NM X X X NM X X X
Vincent Maurer 01/01/06 NM O X O/E NM X X X
Michael Wright 01/01/09 NM X X X NM X X X
Key:
X = Present
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = No Meeting
..... Not a Member
MiNUTES DRAFT
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 8, 2004
MEMBERS PRESENT: Craig Gustaveson, Judith Klink, Margaret Loomer, Ryan O'Leary,
Nancy Ostrognai, Matthew Pacha, Sarah Walz, John Westefeld
MEMBERS ABSENT: David Fleener
STAFF PRESENT: Terry Trueblood, Mike Moran, Terry Robinson
FORMAL ACTION TAKEN
O'Leary requested that the minutes be changed on page 4, last paragraph as follows: He felt the
City should advoeate enforce a tobacco free facility at the park. He asked if the City charges the
........ ~ ................... Ducks Rugby Club for concessions.
Moved by Westefeld~ seconded by O'Leary, to approve the August lit 2004 minutes as
amended. Unanimous.
ANNUAL PARK TOUR
Members departed for the annual tour of park and recreation facilities.
Parks and Recreation Commission
September 8, 2004
Page 2 of 2
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE RECORD
YEAR 2004
TERM t
NAME EXPIRES 1/14 2/11 3/10 4/13 5/12 6/9 7/14 8/11 9/8 10/13 11/10 12/8
Kevin
Boyd 1/1/06 X .................................
David
Fleener 1/1/08 X X X LQ X O/E NM X O/E
Craig
Gustaveson 1/1/07 X X X LQ X X NM X X
Judith
Klink 1/1/07 X O/E X LQ X X NM X X
Margaret
Loomer 1/1/08 X X X LQ X O/E NM X X
Ryan
O'Leary 1/1/06 ......... LQ X X NM X X
Nancy
Ostrognai 1/1/05 X X X LQ X X NM X X
Matt
Pacha 1/1/05 X X X LQ X O/E NM O/E X
Sarah
Walz 1/1/07 X X X LQ X X NM O/E X
John
Westefeld 1/1/06 X X X LQ X X NM X X
KEY: X = Present
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = No meeting
LQ = No meeting due to lack of quorum
.... Not a Member
MINUTES DRAFT
CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 - 7:00 AM
HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL
Members Present: Andy Chappell, Penny Davidsen, Karen Kubby, Naomi Novick,
Lynn Rowat, William Sueppel, Chair; Kevin Wemer, Nate Green
Members Absent: Vicki Lensing
Staff Present: Marian Kart, Eleanor Dilkes, Rick Fosse
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Sueppel called the meeting to order at 7:00 AM. He noted that Lensing
would not be present at this meeting.
APPROVE MINUTES OF AUGUST 26, 2004
Sueppel asked if everyone had reviewed the minutes. Chappell noted that on page 3,
second full paragraph, nine lines down: "Chappell ~tated that the original Charter
Review Commission removed this [emergency exception] from the list in the model
charter..." He asked to clarify this statement by adding that it was a later Charter Review
Commission that removed this, as the original Charter did have the provision on
emergency ordinances.
MOTION: Kubby moved to accept the August 26, 2004, minutes as written.
Chappell seconded. Motion carried 8 - 0 (Lensillg absent).
PUBLIC COMMENT
Sueppel stated that there was one public comment from John Neff, which is outlined in a
memo from John.
MOTION: Novick moved to accept the correspondence from John Neff. Davidsen
seconded. Motion carried 8 - 0 (Lensing absent).
REVIEW CHARTER - Article VII Initiative and Referendum
Sueppel noted that everyone should have received a ~copy of Dilkes' memo regarding the
proposed amendment to Section 7.01 - using the word "measure" in place of
"ordinance." At the last meeting, the members had asked that Dilkes review this section,
and give them a proposed amendment. Kubby asked if it wouldn't be better to have
Public Works Director Rick Fosse speak with them first about the time-line for capital
projects issue that they had previously questioned. Members agreed.
Fosse gave some background on the time-line handout that the members had been given.
He noted that this is a general guideline for the projects in Public Works. Members asked
general questions about projects of this nature. Kubby questioned when the public is
aware of capital improvement projects - at what stage do people pay attention. Fosse
stated that they now have what they call a pre-design meeting, where they go out and
Charter Review Commission
September 8, 2004
Page 2
meet with neighbors in the area where a project is being planned. This way they can talk
with those in the area and get their concerns up front. Sueppel asked where on the time-
line does the City Council become involved. Fosse explained that they do not even begin
to design a project without a funding source, so this iinvolves the Council, as they must
have the funding in the Capital Improvements Plan {CIP).
Sueppel asked Dilkes where she draws the line between Administrative and Legislative
on these issues. Dilkes gave examples from the First Avenue project, and how she made
her determinations on that particular project. She stated that the Charter's current
wording is not clear at all, and that this is a concern. Rowat stated that he feels using
"public improvements," instead of "capital improvements," would make this issue
clearer. Kubby asked where the first "legislative" issue is, after the property acquisition
begins. Fosse stated that the first legislative point is, approval of the Capital Programs;
secondly, the point where they would go to the Council to start the acquisition process;
and the third legislative action begins with the bidding process and public hearings. The
final legislative action is to accept the public improvement. Dilkes reiterated her concern
on where this line is between legislative and administrative. Sueppel stated that the real
question is whether the citizens should have the righl to do their own legislation on
Capital Projects. Discussions continued on this issue, and whether or not the citizens
should be able to stop a capital project once it has begun, and various other related issues.
Sueppel asked if members would give their thinking on the present issue, and he asked
Chappell to start. Chappell stated that he feels this i~ a balancing issue, and that it does
need to be more clear. He likes the idea of the "property acquisition" being their "line,"
and is not comfortable with taking this out completely. Kubby and Green both stated
they agree with Chappell. Novick stated that she would consider removing capital
improvement projects if they are defined in some way, with an exception, although she is
not sure yet what that exception should be. Werner stated that he is also in agreement
with Chappell. Davidsen noted that she believes the citizens have a right to question
capital improvement programs, and that specific projects also need citizen input. She
stated she agrees with Chappell, but that this needs tO stay in in some way. Rowat stated
that public input and the right to question almost anything is very important. He said it
seems they are all leaning towards cutting this process off, but that there needs to be
perhaps a better way to publicize these issues to the Citizens. Sueppel stated that whether
there is property acquisition or not in a project, there needs to be some type of time-line,
and he feels that the public has the right to vote on these issues of capital improvement by
affecting Council. (TAPE ENDS)
Discussion continued among the members, with questions being asked of Fosse on the
time-line of City projects. Sueppel asked if anyone had anything else to add to the
discussion. Davidsen stated that she felt they had had a good discussion, and that she
would like to hear what Dilkes thinks about the point of property acquisition being the
point of cutting off initiative and referendum. Dilkes stated this does help the line-
drawing issue of capital projects, and she gave various examples of acquiring property
and how the City Council handles these matters. Kan' also gave background on the types
Charter Review Commission
September 8, 2004
Page 3
of calls and questions the City gets from the public on how they go about stopping
various projects.
Sueppel asked for clarification of the city budget and how the capital improvement plan
plays into this. Dilkes and Karr responded that the budget is not the capital improvement
plan, but that a lump sum for the CIP is in the budget. Members discussed CIP from the
past, such as the First Avenue project, and how the City handled the problems that arose
at that time. Chappell stated that he would make a motion to add the exclusion, item (K),
and asked that Dilkes give them some language based on his motion. The discussion
continued with Dilkes asking for clarification from ~he members on the wording of this
exclusion. The Commission agreed that they want to include all projects that would
appear on the CIP, regardless of size.
MOTION: Chappell moved to add Limitation (K) to exclude from Initiative and
Referendum, public improvements after such po!nt that the City has authorized or
has acquired property. Kubby seconded. Motion carried 8 - 0 (Lensing absent).
Sueppel then asked the members if they were ready )o start on (J). His proposal was,
"Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and the City Zoning Ordinance are excluded,
deleting the 2-acre exception." Kubby stated that she still feels this issue should be open
to the public, and that she does not agree with adding the Comprehensive Plan, as
suggested. The discussion continued with various members giving their views on this,
and Dilkes stated that she could give them a legal opinion on this issue. Sueppel said an
opinion was not necessary.
MOTION: Sneppel moved to amend (J) by adding Comprehensive Plan and
deleting the 2-acre exception. Rowat seconded. Motion carried 7 - 1 (Kubby voting
the negative; Lensing absent).
(BREAK)
FUTURE MEETING SCHEDULE
Sueppel asked that they skip ahead to discuss future!meeting dates as Green and Kubby
have to leave early. Meetings have been set for Sep!ember 27 and 29; and October 13
and 20, with all meetings running 7 AM to 9:30 AM. Sueppel stated that he would be
gone on the 20th of October, and wondered if October 11th would work. Novick asked
that they plan a public hearing early in October, so that Davidsen could be part of that
process, as she will be leaving the end of October. Rowat asked for clarification of what
type of format this public hearing would be. Suepp~l stated that they need to make some
decisions before they hold this public heating, so there will be items for public
discussion. Some outstanding issues are: today's decisions of increasing or clarifying
initiative or referendum limitations; the directly-elec~ted mayor issue; and the district
versus at-large seats issue. (TAPE ENDS)
Charter Review Commission
September 8, 2004
Page 4
Discussion returned to whether or not the members 9ould meet on October 11th. It was
agreed to add this date to the October schedule. Sueppel then asked if the members
wanted to have the public hearing on the evening olY October 13th. Dilkes reminded them
that they need to leave plenty of time in order to get packets out, a press release done, and
public notification given. Davidsen stated that she feels they should have a less
structured public heating, with this first one being fairly open to whatever discussions
come up. (Green left mtg. 8:45 AM) Chappell statgd that he recommends that Karr
come to the next meeting with a list of potential dates for public hearings, and that they
add to the agenda what they want exactly for the public hearing discussion to be, as well
as type of format for the heating. Karr asked for some direction from the members, and
asked that they give her two or three dates, and time! of day as well. After much
discussion, the members decided to meet October 1 ! and 13, from 7-9 AM for their
regular review meeting, and to look at October 12, fi.om 7-9 PM for the public hearing. It
was also agreed that October 20 and 27th would be regular morning meetings, and if
changes need to be made to the schedule, they can always cancel.
REVIEW CHARTER (cont.)
Sueppel next discussed Dilkes' memo to the Commission, regarding the proposed
amendment to Section 7.01 - Ordinance vs. MeasUre. A brief discussion ensued where
members asked Dilkes how this amendment will make the Charter clearer, and which
wording changes were made to this section.
MOTION: Chappell moved to approve the amendment to the Charter, in
accordance with Dilkes' draft of September 1, 2004. Davidsen seconded. Motion
carried 7 - 0 (Green and Lensing absent).
Sueppel reviewed what has been accomplished on Section B. Limitations, (1) Subject
Matter thus far: agreed to add some language (k) to exclude capital projects after
property has been acquired and amend (j) regarding goning. Various discussions took
place to clarify these amendments, and Dilkes will Work with the wording and present it
to the Commission. Sueppel next addressed (2) ResUbmission and the 2-year date.
There were no changes or additions made here. Kuhby asked about B (3) Council
Repeal, Amendment and Reenactment, and ifthe~e was, for example, an initiative that
passed, can the Council be inactive on this specific issue, or must they act on it.
C. Construction (1) Scope of Power - Chappell asked if the word "voters" should be
changed to "electors." Sueppel stated that it would be helpful if the members would
make note of language and grammatical errors, versus substantial changes, so that these
changes can be adopted by the Council sooner. Discussion next turned to (2) Initiative
(a) and Sueppel questioned the repeal part of this section. Novick stated that she has a
problem with this one due to the wording. She would like to simplify this and say, "A
petition will be valid if it repeals or amends," rather than "no petition will be invalid."
Other members noted that this would be a substantive change, and Dilkes gave some
examples.
Charter Review Commission
September 8, 2004
Page 5
(3) Referendum - Sueppel stated that he has no problems with this section. (Kubby left
at 9:20 AM) The discussion next turned to D. Effeet of Filing Petition. There were no
additions or changes to this section. E. City Obligations - the next section was
discussed, and Dilkes' changes were noted. Discussion of Section 7.01. General
Provisions was wrapped up at 9:25 AM.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Davidsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 AM. Rowat seconded.
Motion carried 6 - 0 (Kubby, Green, and Lensing absent).
I 09-'16-04 I
IP'I2
MINUTES DRAFT
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 - 7:00 P.M.
EMMA HARVAT HALL - CIVIC CENTER
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Gunn, Michael Maharry, Mark McCallum, dim Ponto, Amy Smothers, Tim
Weitzel
MEMBERS ABSENT: dames Enloe, Jann Weismiller, Justine Zimmer
STAFF PRESENT: Shelley McCafferty
OTHERS PRESENT: David Tingwald, Eric Gidal, Helen Burford, Vicki Struzynski Olson, Doris Houser,
Mike Haverkamp, W. Max Mons, R~bin Dull, Phil Launspach, Kevin Deets, Julie
McNalley, Claire Sponsler, Susan Fu~rell, Dwight Dobberstein, Susan Buss-Paulsen,
Clarence Haverkamp, Walter Kopsa, Jeff Dill, Jill Gaulding
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Maharry called the meetiin§ to order at 7:0~1 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Public hearinqs for proposed local ordinance historic districts:
McCafferty discussed what it means to be a local historic distr!ct, the impact that would have on property, and
the process the Commission is going through at this time. She said that this hearing concerns designation of
a local historic district. McCafferty said that recently there was a hearing regarding a National Register of
Historic Places historic district for this area.
McCafferty said this is a separate type of district that involves a rezoning. She stated that the National
Register nomination plays into this process in that it determines the historic significance of the area and that it
meets the criteria established by State and City code for a local historic district.
McCafferty said this process began back in 1992 with the adoption of the Historic Preservation Plan, which
set out various goals and objectives for historic preservation in Iowa City. She said that since that time there
have been four different surveys and evaluations done on various areas in the North Side. McCafferty said
the results include site information sheets for each individual property, an overall history of the area done by
an architectural historian, and recommendations for where there may be districts and landmarks.
McCafferty said the Commission is at the point in the process of historic overlay zoning and added that there
is a long process for local designation. McCafferty said the Commission is currently holding the first of what
may be one or multiple public hearings. She stated that following Commission consideration, the Commission
will make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. McCafferty said the Planning and
Zoning Commission will hold two public discussions and then make a recommendation to the City Council.
She said that the City Council will hold at least three public meetings to consider an ordinance to designate
these districts.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 2
McCafferty stated that the purpose of establishing a historic preservation overlay zone is not to prevent
changes within historic neighborhoods but to manage those Changes to ensure that they are compatible with
the overall historic character.
McCafferty showed examples of changes that have been made in districts. She stated that some changes
involved architects, and some involved design assistance from staff and the Commission. McCafferty said
that the historic overlay zone is not intended to alter use. She said what it does is put in place a process by
which changes to the exterior of a property requiring a building permit are reviewed by the Commission.
McCafferty said that the historic preservation regulations are not intended to interfere with building codes.
She said that concessions have been made to the guidelines in order to accommodate building codes.
McCafferty said one concern of property owners is the process they will have to go through if their property is
in a historic district. She stated that if an owner wants to make a change that requires a building permit to a
property and will change the exterior, the owner has to go through the Commission's historic review process.
McCafferty said this involves submitting an application, and there is an evaluation with staff. She stated that
staff typically works with the applicant to ensure that the application complies with the appropriate guidelines.
McCafferty said that if the owner is doing a repair and it will not change the looks of the property, he/she can
apply for a certificate of no material effect. She said the certificate of no material effect is reviewed typically in
two or three days by the chair and staff. McCafferty said a ~more substatntial change to the exterior of the
property would require review by the Commission and would typically take two weeks in the summer and up
to three weeks in the winter.
McCafferty said that if the application is denied, it can be al~pealed to the City Council. She said the City
Council will determine if the Commission acted in an arbitrary or capricious manner. McCafferty said the City
Council cannot necessarily reverse the Commission's decision if the Commission was not arbitrary or
capricious.
McCafferty said the terms non-contributing, contributing, and key are applied to properties. She said that
non-contributing buildings typically have been significantly altered but are still historic buildings, and hopefully
in the future, their condition may be improved and they may be restored to a historic condition and reclassified
as contributing. McCafferty stated that key buildings are bUildings that are particularly significant and are
usually eligible for designation on the National Register or have particular prominence on the streetscape.
Regarding the guidelines, McCafferty said the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook has been prepared
by the Commission. She said that by City code, all changes to the exterior of property must comply with the
Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation. McCafferty said the Iowa City guidelines are more
specific guidelines compiled by the Commission and deal with issues that are common in Iowa City. She said
the guidelines primarily look at making buildings, changes, and additions consistent with the historic
structures, but there is some flexibility for more creative solutions. McCafferty said the Handbook is available
for $4 from the Planning Department or can be found on the Iowa City website.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 3
Ronalds Street Expansion of the Brown Street Historic District~
Public hearing.
McCafferty pointed out on the overhead map that most of :the Ronalds Street expansion is zoned RS-8,
medium density, single-family, although there is one small area composed of two properties that is zoned
RNC-12, residential neighborhood conservation with a density of twelve units per acre.
David Tin.qwald, 631 North Dodqe Street, stated that his property is listed as a key property. He gave a brief
history of his property, saying that it was once a residence of a blacksmith, with an addition put on in the
1870s or 1880s. Tingwald said he believes his house is much as it was 125 years ago, in terms of its exterior
structure.
Tingwald said he supports the expansion of the Brown Street Historic District to Ronalds Street and thanked
the Commission for the time spent on this.
Eric Gidal, 714 North Johnson Street, said that his property is also a key structure. He said he supports this
designation and thanked the Commission for considering it.
Helen Burford, 604 Ronalds Street, said her property is listed as a key structure. She thanked the Historic
Preservation Commission and the City of Iowa City for efforts to nominate the homes on Ronalds Street to the
National Register of Historic Places and for pursuing the annexation of this area to the Brown Street Historic
District.
Burford said the steps the Commission has taken to recognize this area only underscore the efforts of
everyone at the meeting from this area to make the neighborhood a more attractive place to live. She said
that she, like others at the meeting, actually cherishes the neighborhood and its proximity to downtown and
the University, as well as the homes in the area and the history surrounding them.
Burford said we should aggressively recognize this area as a historic district and recognize its cultural
significance to Iowa City. She hoped that everyone would be able to work together to save the area for future
generations.
Vicki Struzynski Olson, 2446 260th Street, Tiffin, said she lives in rural Johnson County but owns property on
Ronalds Street. She said she was unfamiliar with the process and the progress made to date and wondered
whether the boundary indicated on the map has been predetermined or if it is a solid boundary that needs to
be there. Struzynski OIson said the property she owns is 527 Ronalds Street, a non-historic property, and
she asked if it could be notched out like the property just south of 630 Dodge Street and the property on
Governor Street.
McCafferty said that to the extent possible, when the boundaries are drawn the consultant and the
Commission try to exclude non-historic properties. She said, however, that the Commission likes to keep
boundaries clean and easy to understand, and that is most liikely the reason the boundary is drawn as it is.
McCafferty stated that there are only three guidelines for non-historic properties to comply with.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 4
Doris Houser, 3580 Vista Park, said she is also concerned about how the boundary was drawn. She said she
is concerned for her income property at 611 North Johnson. Houser said that because this is primarily an
income property, she would not want to go through the bureaucracy for every little repair, and it would also
cost a little more.
Houser said she is also concerned about keeping the property up and keeping in the context of the historic
character of the neighborhood. She said she feels that is app!ropriate and is her responsibility as an owner of
income property, and she certainly will do that. Houser said she would really like to have the Commission
notch that back and have the boundary go down the alley, particularly since her property is commercial and
not a single-family residence.
McCafferty said the Commission received a letter from Houser, and she distributed the site inventory sheet for
the property. Houser said her property is a three-plex.
Public hearing closed.
Ponto said that because both 611 and 614 North Johnson a~e key properties, that is probably why they are
included. He said that because the underlying zoning is different, he is no longer as certain as he once was
whether it is appropriate to include those properties. Ponto saiid he could probably go either way on it.
McCafferty said that the other two districts that the Commission would be looking at have multiple zones
within them as do some of the existing local districts. Ponto said he understood that but was thinking more in
terms of this particular district.
McCallum asked about the nature of RNC-12 and if it is primarily single-family residential and not multifamily
commercial zone. McCafferty stated that commercial property generally has a business located within it,
whereas multi-family, such as 611 North Johnson, has multiple residences within it. She said that none of
these properties are zoned for commercial, but there are properties here that are residential income-
generating properties.
Gunn said that the College Green Historic District and the COllege Hill Conservation District both have some
RNC-12 zoning.
MOTION: Ponto moved to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that the Ronalds
Street Expansion of the Brown Street Historic District, with boundaries as shown on the existing map,
be rezoned to historic preservation overlay for the purpose of designating a local historic district.
McCallum seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
McCafferty stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission would most likely consider this rezoning at its
meeting on the third Thursday in October. She said that residents within the district as well as those adjacent
to the district would receive notification by mail of that meeting.
Jefferson Street Historic District.
Public hearing.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 5
Mike Haverkamp, 109 North Van Buren, thanked the CommisSion for recommending this area for designation.
He said he has lived in the district as an owner for 18 years, Haverkamp said it is a wonderfully preserved
area of town. He said there is a lot of different zoning within it; and there are a lot of different facilities within a
very small area.
Haverkamp said this is an area that deserves preservation, and he is very glad the Commission is looking at
this area to make sure the original structures and their creativ~ uses that have evolved over the years can be
held on to.
W. Max Mons, 404 E. Jefferson Street, said he represents; St. Paul's Lutheran Chapel. He thanked the
Commission for its work and said this is a beautiful neighborhood and area.
Mons said he objects to being included in this historic overlay zone, because his is a church that has doubled
in its worship attendance over the past four years, and the church is looking at the possibility of adding on to
the building. Mons said he was concerned that restrictions placed on the historic building might make an
addition cost prohibitive, which would interfere with the church's mission to serve the community and the
students at The University of Iowa.
Robin Dull, 320 E. Jefferson, said that he supports this proposal. He said his family has lived in their house
for 25 years and feels that it is a unique house and a unique and special district. Dull said he hoped the
Commission would vote in favor of this.
Phil Launspach, 136 Koser Avenue, said he manages some of the properties in the 400 block of Jefferson
Street. He asked if this was the first meeting regarding this iissue. McCafferty replied that this was the first
meeting, and there was the potential for more meetings, depending on the Commission's vote. She said
there would also be two Planning and Zoning Commission meetings and three City Council meetings.
Launspach asked about the notification process. McCafferty said that all of the property owners were notified,
based on records from the tax assessor and on rental permits.,
Launspach asked what percentage of the properties is commercial and what percentage is residential.
McCafferty said that the churches and the University building would be considered institutional uses. She
was uncertain if any of the RO zoned properties had commercial properties on the first level. McCafferty said
commercial uses are allowed in the RO zone, but they are quite restricted. She added that rental properties
are considered a residential use, even though they are income generating.
McCafferty said the Planning and Zoning Commission would 10ok at this to determine whether it complies with
the Comprehensive Plan and any other land use documents and regulations.
Launspach asked what would happen if the owner wanted to tear down his key property and build a new
structure. McCafferty said that demolition of a key property is really only allowed if there are structural
defects. She said if there is certification from a professionail engineer that there are structural issues that
would be an economic hardship to repair, then demolition might be allowed.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 6
Launspach said that at least in the 400 block of Jefferson Street and at 325 Jefferson Street, the University
property, there has been a lot of termite destruction. He asked if the Commission would allow the University
to tear down its building, which is a key property. McCafferty said that the University is unique in that as a
State entity it is not required to adhere to any municipal laws. She said that for privately owned properties, if
the termite damage is so severe that the building cannot be reasonably repaired and rehabilitated, then
demolition may be allowed. McCafferty pointed out that new construction would have to be approved by the
Commission.
Launspach asked if it is beyond his control to have several properties excluded from this zone. McCafferty
said Launspach can inform the Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and
the City Council of his wishes. Launspach said he just found eut about this meeting regarding this rezoning.
Maharry said there was a question and answer session held last month, and all property owners were notified
of that session. Several people in attendance said they did not receive notification. McCafferty said the
notice was sent in conjunction with the National Register public hearing, which also included discussion of the
local designation. She requested any address corrections from those in attendance.
Public hearing closed.
Weitzel said it was his recollection that the guidelines and the Commission's previous voting record show that
the Commission has not restricted people from putting additions on their buildings. He said there are
guidelines for the appearance, but the Commission has not stopped an addition from being built.
Gunn said he is in his eighth year on the Commission, and he did not recall any time when a property owner
wanted an addition when that addition was not approved. He said there is no restriction against adding to
buildings; it's just that the manner in which it is done may need to be adjusted a little.
Gunn said there is an idea that a project always costs a whole lot more money once it comes before the
Commission, and that is just not the case. He said it can cos~ more, but sometimes it costs less. Gunn said
the Commission does not just automatically add a lot of dollars to what the owner wants to do; sometimes the
Commission's recommendation is for something simpler. He said the Commission does have guidelines to
follow, and if the guidelines don't allow for the cheapest posSible construction, the Commission doesn't feel
obligated to allow the cheapest possible construction. Gunn said the guidelines are intended for properties to
have additions that are consistent with the character of the property, and that is what the Commission tries to
uphold.
Maharry asked if the Commission would consider making its decision pending satisfactory evidence that
everyone was notified. McCafferty said that an affidavit is filed with the City Clerk giving all the addresses to
which letters and notifications were senL She said she could certainly verify the addresses.
Gunn said that since there may be some issue with notification and more input that people want to provide, he
would like to continue this to the next meeting for further discussion. McCafferty said she would notify owners
of the continued meeting.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 7
Weitzel said there are a lot of factors in the consideration of a district. He said that keeping people in the
district happy is one factor. Weitzel said the consultant's evidence and the benefit to the community are other
factors.
Regarding opposition, McCafferty said that when the rezoning gets to City Council, if there is a significant
square footage, based on area, of objections, then that could require a supermajority decision by City Council.
She said the final decision on this is made by City Council, and property owners have a right to object to the
rezoning by filing a formal protest at the City Clerk's office.
Kevin Deets, 415 Jefferson Street, asked how much square footage is in this area. M¢Cafferty said that
would come into play at the City Council stage. She said that at that point, she would map out all the protests
and determine the square footage based on maps from the County to see if the threshold has been met for
the supermajority. McCafferty said anyone wanting an update could call the City Clerk or her office. She said
the information regarding the protest for rezoning in to specific to just this type of rezoning, but applies to all
rezonings.
Maharry said he is confident that the City has notified people, because this problem has arisen in the past,
and the Commission has wanted to make absolutely certain that everyone was notified. He said the
Commission could certainly delay a vote on this pending r~view of the affidavits showing everyone was
notified.
Maharry said that due process is very important. He said that part of due process is adequate notification.
Maharry said he thought it would be of benefit to look into this Ko see that everyone was notified.
Weitzel said that if there are objections, the Commission will want to hear why the house doesn't comply with
the historic district. He said the Commission has heard specific complaints about the restrictions, but for a
standard, single-family house or a mixed use home with an office or apartment, he did not see what the
Commission would be doing that would be changed by just a simple, negative response. Weitzel said that
strict use questions are under the purview of the Planning and Zoning Commission.
McCallum said he would support a continued hearing.
MOTION: Gunn moved to table discussion of the Jeffeirson Street Historic District to the Historic
Preservation Commission's next meeting.
Gunn said he did not believe this would not eventually pass, although he said the Commission may make
some changes to the district or the guidelines. Gunn said deferral would give people another chance for
input. He said that sometimes districts take six to eight monrths to iron out. He said he thought something
would go through here but thought it would take another meeting or two before the vast majority of people
within the district are comfortable with it. Gunn said that comfort level takes time and an educational process.
McCallum seconded the motion.
Ponto agreed that it is reasonable to hold another meeting at this issue.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 8
AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION: Gunn moved tO amend his motion to call another public
hearing if a public hearing is required to take action. :McCallum seconded the amendment. The
motion~ as amended~ carried on a vote of 6-0.
Smothers said she would like to move forward at the next meeting and receive positive input about what
people want to have happen in their neighborhoods, rather than focusing on the issue of notification.
Gilbert-Linn Street Historic District.
Public hearing.
Julie McNalley, 317 Fairchild, said she supports this proposal. She said that she and her husband think it is a
great idea. McNalley said she has lived in the neighborhood for four years and is really excited about this
possibility. She said she thinks this would help maintain the neighborhood as a wonderful place to live close
to downtown.
Claire Sponsler, 413 North Gilbert Street, said that she s~rongly supports the district and thinks it is a
wonderful opportunity for preserving a unique part of the North Side and for making sure the neighborhood
stays a viable place.
Sponsler said the area has an eclectic mix of people where renters, homeowners, and businesses can thrive.
She said there are a number of businesses and property owners already within the North Side that inhabit
historically significantly buildings. She said those buildings are being kept up, and those businesses appear
to be thriving in these historic buildings. Sponsler said she did not see any conflict between commercial use
and historic preservation. She said the historic preservation possibility would be an asset for everyone who is
part of the proposed district.
Sue Futrell, 311 Fairchild Street, said her property is a key property in the proposed district. She thanked the
Commission for moving ahead with this, and she spoke in support of the designation.
Futrell said she and her husband have lived in Iowa City for over 30 years, mostly in the older neighborhoods.
She said she owns her house in this neighborhood and also owns a single-family rental property in the
Longfellow Neighborhood, and she is therefore familiar with the historic designation from both an income-
generating standpoint and as a resident. Futrell said she has done maintenance and improvements to both
properties and feels it is important to do so in a way that is consistent with the historic style of the
neighborhood.
Futrell said part of what makes Iowa City a unique and attractive place to live are the unique and unusual
older historic neighborhoods in town. She stated that will be increasingly important to Iowa City economically
as it tries to attract and keep people in the City. Futrell said there are lots of sections of town that have been
expanded and are being built up, and there is a considerable proportion of the City now that has been built in
the last 40 or 50 years. She said there are only a few relatively small pads of town that have the possibility of
being preserved as historic areas. Futrell said that makes this even more important.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 9
Dwight Dobberstein, 326 N. Linn, said that he owns a couple,of houses other than the one he lives on in the
300 block of Linn Street. He said that he has lived there for over 30 years. Dobberstein said that he is an
architect and has worked on quite a few projects that have received recognition for historic preservation.
Dobberstein said he is familiar with historic preservation and applauds its use for individual buildings. He
said, however, that he finds the whole idea flawed for a neighborhood. Dobberstein said he did not see how
one could preserve a neighborhood, because there would be the issue of picking a historic period for
preservation. He stated that the neighborhood has been evolving since he has been there.
Dobberstein said the neighborhood has changed from single-family to student rentals. He said the
neighborhood changed a lot in the 1970s. Dobberstein said that he has made a number of changes to all
three of his buildings, and he believed that many of those changes would not have met the guidelines.
Maharry said there are many things in the guidelines that the Commission recommends but absolutely does
not require.
Dobberstein said the changes he has made to his houses have been solely to make them more livable,
particularly the addition of bathrooms and upgrading of kitchens. Weitzel said the Commission does not
oversee where bathrooms are or where kitchens are. Dobberstein agreed but said an addition also changes
the outside appearance of a building. Weitzel said the Commission usually looks for a compatible way to add
on to a building.
McCafferty said that there are a number of terms defined under the Secretary of the Interior Standards
including preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction. She stated that what the Commission
deals with in terms of its regulations is rehabilitation. McCafferty said that rehabilitation is defined as, "the act
or process of making possible a compatible use for a property through repair, alterations, and additions, while
preserving those portions or features which convey its historical, cultural, or architectural value." She said
that is very different from preservation, which tries to preserve something as is or restoration which preserves
something at a specific point in time. McCafferty said the guidelines are intended to allow changes while
identifying the features that are significant to the property and preserving those features. She said there is
latitude, however, to allow changes of use.
Dobberstein said he is concerned that his next changes will not be approved. He said he would prefer to
have his own say when it comes to his property, and that is why he objects to this rezoning.
Dobberstein said he favors historic designs on many buildings that should be preserved. He said he did not
think this is appropriate for the neighborhood. Dobberstein said he thought it would kill the vitality and
creativity of the neighborhood. He said that architecture is an art and should be an expression of what one is
thinking and feeling and of the times. Dobberstein asked who is to say that the changes made today will not
be historic 50 years from now. He said the neighborhood is evolving, and he would not know what time or
period to keep.
Smothers said that she would not pick a time period to keep for any property in Iowa City. She said the
Commission does believe in the evolution of buildings. Smothers said the guidelines are not to control or
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 10
stifle creativity. She said it would be good to witness what the Commission goes through when people come
for suggestions. Smothers said it is not as controlling as some believe.
Dobberstein applauded the members of the Commission for their efforts and time in serving on the
Commission. He said that a lot of the guidelines are excellent, and he has followed most of them.
Dobberstein said, however, that he did not feel his changes would have been approved.
McCafferty said the Commission would be interested in looking at Dobberstein's projects. Weitzel said the
Commission works for compromise and solutions that are wimwin for everyone.
Sara Buss-Paulsen, 416 North Linn Street, said that she and! her husband very much support this proposal.
She stated that this neighborhood is very important to the vitality of the City, and part of what makes it so
valuable is the way it looks. Buss-Paulsen said that everyone wants to have control over decision-making in
connection with their properties, but even if this does not go through, there are all kinds of restrictions on what
one can do with his property. She said that the issue is which restrictions people want, as a community, to
support. Buss-Paulsen said that to answer that question, we have to ask what are our goals as a community.
Buss-Paulsen said she is speaking not just as an owner of 416 North Linn Street but as a citizen of this town.
She said she would like the town to thrive and continue to be a beautiful place to live. Buss-Paulsen said that
if we as citizens don't think about how to make certain that is true, things can get away from us. She said that
most of what happens in any organized collection of human beings happens because of a lot of decisions that
people make about how they are going to live together and organize themselves; it is not just a fact of nature.
Buss-Paulsen said this proposal is a very good one, and from what she has heard, it should not restrict
creativity or represent significant limitations that are incompatible with aims that we should all have as citizens
who love our city.
Phil Launspach asked if there is an appeal process if Dobberstein had wanted to do something the
Commission felt was inappropriate and it was denied. McCafferty said the appeals process determines
whether the Commission's decision was arbitrary or capricious.
Launspach said his family is originally from Dubuque, and he asked if there are historic districts in Dubuque
and if this is fairly common throughout Iowa. McCafferty said she could look up and provide more statistics
regarding this. She said there are historic districts in Dubuqule that are local districts and are regulated. She
added that regulated historic districts are not a new phenomena.
Clarence Haverkamp, 619 North Linn Street, said his property is designated as a key property. He said that
he has lived in the neighborhood for approximately 18 years. Haverkamp said that during that time, he has
seen a shift from landlord/rental type properties to owner-occupied properties. He said he has seen a lot of
houses undergoing changes to bring them back to what they perhaps were at one time or to something close
to what they were.
Haverkamp said he would like to see this become a historic district because, as a single-family property
owner, he would like to have some kind of guarantee that the, property he is fixing up is going to maintain its
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 11
value, rather than having the house next to his come up for Sale and go back to being a rental property. He
said that is very important for this type of neighborhood. Havarkamp said that some rental properties are very
good, but some are not. He said that when a property is s01d for a rental property, one cannot be certain
which way it will go. Haverkamp said he would like to see the Commission vote yes for this because of a
guarantee to single-family properties.
Walter Kopsa, 330 Ashwood, said he was at the Commission's meeting a couple of weeks ago at which there
was significant opposition to a National Register designation. He said he was surprised to find out that before
the National Register designation is approved, the Commission is going ahead with the local designation.
Kopsa asked if this were standard operating procedure.
McCafferty responded that the purpose of the National Register nomination is to determine historic
significance. She said that what the Commission has done in the past, as well as in this case, is to take the
National Register nomination to the point where the CommisSion knows it meets the criteria of State and City
codes for historic significance. McCafferty said this district has not been officially listed yet, but there is
substantial research and documentation that the criteria are met.
Kopsa asked if that had been resubmitted to the State because the boundaries have been changed.
McCafferty said the proposal was resubmitted to exclude the commercially zoned properties. Kopsa asked if
the affected property owners would be re-notified for a chance to send in an objection. McCafferty stated that
the National Register nomination for the revised district will I~e reviewed February 11, and property owners
will receive notification of the February 11th review from the State.
Kopsa said he has owned properties in this district since 1982. He said he owns two properties here, and
they are both rental properties. Kopsa said he has always maintained his properties and feels they are nice-
looking properties, but he has no interest whatsoever in becaming part of a historic preservation district. He
said that he does not feel he needs to come before a commission every time he wants to make changes to
his property. Kopsa said the City's present regulations are quite enough. He added that, with regard to
Clarence Haverkamp's comments, the historic designation has nothing to do with use.
Kopsa said the Commission does not really know how many people are for or against this. He said that for
something this drastic, it seems there should have to be some kind of census from everyone owning property
in the district to find out how they feel about it.
Maharry stated that this is a participatory democracy. Everyone is notified of the issue and has the
opportunity to participate. It is not the City's responsibility to elnsure that everyone participates.
McCafferty said that property owners will be notified of the Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. She
added that notice will not be sent regarding City Council consideration, but the agenda is published in the
newspaper and on the City website..
Jeff Dill, 720 Rosebud Court, Coralville, said he has lived in this area for 15 years, first as a student. He said
he recalls thinking what a wonderful and nicely maintained area this was, including the rental properties.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 12
Dill said that he now owns a rental property in this area and feels like he takes good care of it. He said he
opposes this, because he doesn't feel he should have to go thorough red tape and have someone tell him what
he can or cannot do with his property.
Jill Gauldin.q, 225 East Davenport, said she is in favor of the district, in part because in the end, it honestly will
be the best solution to meet most people's needs most effectively.
Gaulding said this neighborhood is a treasure to the commu~nity on a number of levels. She said that it is
especially beneficial to downtown. Gaulding stated that resiidents struggle with the character of downtown
and would like it to not just be bars but also have stores to shop in. She said that she and her neighbors shop
downtown, and there is fairly good evidence that it will be hard to maintain downtown unless pedestrians keep
flowing through there.
Gaulding said that another way in which having this neighborhood preserved benefits the entire community is
that having a district is recognized nationwide as a signal of quality, and quality in terms of a community that
works together around pleasantness of life issues. She stated that Iowa City is often on lists of best places to
live. Gaulding said that one of the factors used to decide whether a town is a good place to live is how many
historic districts it has.
Gaulding said that she appreciates a neighborhood that looks nice and is well cared for. She said that for her,
the most important thing about the historic designation and tlhe zoning that goes with it is an indication that
this is a neighborhood that is committed to working together ~o make this a pleasant place to live. Gaulding
said that if only students live there, there won't be the same kind of character. She said that a certain balance
is needed. Gaulding said that to get families to live there, there needs to be some sort of signal and a sense
of comfort. She said having this historic designation is a signa~ to people.
Gaulding said she appreciates people's concerns about being told what to do. She said that owners are told
what to do a little bit anyway, and this is just a tiny layer above that saying that there will have to be some
discussion before someone can put a deck on his house.
Gaulding said she appreciated the Commission considering this as a district and said that she thought some
of the concerns that people have could be worked out.
Public hearing closed.
Ponto asked people in attendance if they received notification and if that was an issue for this district. Kopsa
said that he believes that when people received the second letter, they didn't read it carefully and thought it
was something else to do with the National Register nomination. He said that many people apparently were
not aware that the Commission was moving ahead with local designation.
Kopsa asked if this would go through the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council before that
National Register designation. McCafferty said that with the way the timing is at this point, it is likely that it will
be coincidental with that designation.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 13
Gunn said that the Longfellow local historic district was in place before the National Register district. He said
there has been some opposition to every district the Commis!sion has passed since he has been a member.
Gunn said that he believes that what the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council look at is the
public good that comes out of it and the number of people who will benefit as opposed to the few people who
are opposed.
Gunn said that sometimes there are more than just a few people opposed. He said that once people
understand what the Commission does, however, they become more comfortable with the process. Gunn
said the Commission does not require all sorts of expensive, ridiculous things. He said there are now 1,700
to 1,800 properties under design review, and the process goes on rather smoothly considering how many
properties are involved. Gunn said he thinks the value of this will in time convince most people.
Maharry said the Commission had also received a packet of letters and for this particular district. Kopsa said
that the Commission had received well over 20 letters in opposition to the National Register designation. He
said the people who wrote those letters would obviously also oppose a local designation if they opposed the
National Register designation, as the National Register designation is much less restrictive. McCafferty said
that the letters are all available in her office for anyone who wants to look at them.
Maharry said the Commission is reviewing whether this is a good or bad thing for Iowa City. He said that
whether this is historic or not was considered in the vote for the National Register District and whether the
Commission agreed with the findings of Marlys Svendsen. Maharry stated that this is consideration of
whether, after receiving input from the public, this is a good proposal to put forward.
McCallum said, regarding the National Register District, the Oommission did listen to the public and did make
modifications, and that is reflected in the boundary map for the local district. He added that he is an
investment property owner of a multi-family building in a historic district. McCallum said this is the second
property he has owned in a historic district. He said he has rio vacancies and has benefited from this; it has
been a good thing for him.
McCallum said that people are looking for this type of housing and sense of place. He said that he does not
always buy into the economic argument that this will hurt investment property owner per se. McCallum said
that he is a realtor, and he is seeing higher property values for conversion to single-family homes right now.
He said that in this neighborhood, this is a segmented marke~, and there are higher property values on small,
single-family homes than on some of the investment properties. McCallum said he thinks that with the district,
the highest and best use may again become single-family homes in these neighborhoods. He said that the
demand is there, and he did not think a district would hurt either investment or single-family property owners
in this area.
MOTION: Gunn moved to recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission that the Gilbert-Linn
Street Historic District, with boundaries as shown on the existing map, be rezoned to historic
preservation overlay for the purpose of designating a local historic district. Weitzel seconded the
motion.
Historic Preservation Commission
September 9, 2004
Page 14
Maharry said there are a lot of arguments on all sides of the issue. He said there appears to be support by
residents of the neighborhood for this, and there are also I~ersuasive arguments as far as economic and
neighborhood-defining characteristics that make this a good idea. Maharry said he supported this.
The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
McCafferty urged anyone with additional questions or anyone seeking additional information to contact her.
CONSIDERATION OF THE AUGUST 26, 2004 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETING
MINUTES:
MOTION: Ponto moved to approve the minutes of the August 26, 2004 Historic Preservation Commission
meeting, as written. McCallum seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION:
14-5E-19 Responsibilities of Owners Relating to the Maintenalnce and Occupancy of Premises (Demolition by
Ne,qlect):
McCafferty said the information is already in the code under the Housing Code. She said that this ordinance
change would emphasize this portion of the code and apply it to commercial use, if applicable. McCafferty
said that it currently only applies to residential uses.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:54 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte
Pcd/min utes/hpcJ2004/9-9-04hpc.doc
Historic Preservation Commission
Attendance Record
2004
TelT~
Name Expires 01/08 02/12 02/26 03/11 04/08 04/22 05/13 05/27 06/10 06/14 07/08 07/22 08/10 08/26 09/09 10/14 11/11 12/~]
A. Smothers 3/29/05 NM X O/E X X X X O/E X X X X X X X
J. Enloe 3/29/06 NM O/E X X X O O O O O O O O O O
M. Gunn 3/29/07 NM O/E O/E X O/E O/E X X X X O X X X X
M. Maharry 3/29/05 NM X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
M. McCallum 3/29/06 NM X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
J. Ponto 3/29/07 NM X X X X X X X O/E X X X X X X
P. Sueppel 3/29/06 NM O/E O/E X X X X X X O X O ............
J. W¢issmiller 3/29/06 ........................................................ O
T. Weitzel 3/29/05 NM X X X X O/E X O/E X X X X X X X
J. Zimmer 3/29/07 ................ O/E O/E O/E X O/E X O O X X O
Key:
X - Present
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = No Meeting
..... Not a Member
MINUTES
SCATTERED SITE HOUSING TASKFORCE
AUGUST 30, 2004
CITY HALL, LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Don Anciaux, Jerry Anthony, Darlene Clausen, Matthew Hayek,
Jan Left, Jan Peterson, Sally Stutsman
MEMBERS ABSENT: Joan Vandenberg
STAFF PRESENT: Tracy Hightshoe, Steve Rackis
OTHERS PRESENT: Phil Jones, Von Stange (Residence Services, UI)
Steve Gordon, Dan Smith, Joan Tiemeyer (Iowa City Homebuilders Assoc.)
Heather MacDonald (Professor, Urban & Regional Planning, UI)
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Hayek called the meeting to order at 5:10 pm.
Approval of August 2, 2004 and Auqust 16, 2004 Minutes:
MOTION: A motion was made by Anciaux, seconded by Stutsman to approve the August 2 Minutes with
corrections of typographical errors. Motion carried 7-0.
Hayek requested deferral of approval of August 16 Minutes, as he did not receive them. All agreed.
Stutsman noted that alternative Minute format from August 16 was easier to read and preferable to the
previous format.
Presentation by University of Iowa Residence Services
Phil Jones and Von Stange of University of Iowa (UI) Residence Services presented data on students
housed by the University. Stange reported that residence halls have been at or over capacity for
approximately the last 10 years. Residence halls house mostly freshman and sophomores, and the UI is
committed to housing all incoming freshman to assist with the transition to college life. UI also maintains
694 - 2 BR apartment units on the west side of campus, with 60-65% of the occupants being married.
Hayek: What have been recent changes and trends in student housing, and how does enrollment affect
on-campus housing? Also, what are percentages of students in UI housing versus the private market?
What impact do the students have on the private market?
Stange reported that UI houses approximately 90% of the freshman class and 27% of the sophomore
class. Numbers drop drastically for upperclassmen and graduate students. Percentage of freshman
housed is consistent with other comparable universities, and has been consistent over past years.
Jones estimated UI enrollment at 29,000 to 30,000, including graduate students. Jones predicted that the
current housing status would remain lhe same unless changes occur in overall enrollment of the
University. Jones further reported that UI enrollment is unlikely to increase significantly in the foreseeable
future, as no increase in classroom space is occurring or planned.
UI currently houses over 5,600 students in the residence halls, comprised mostly of freshmen and
sophomores. Upperclassmen in residence halls are generally in Resident Advisor (RA) positions. The UI
is working to reduce density in residence halls by reducing the number of triple rooms. However, all
entering students are guaranteed housing, so the number of triple rooms varies. UI considers increases in
capacity with concern directed towards educational needs. Ul does not have any designated grad student
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 2
residence halls, but apartments are available for married students, where priority is given to students with
dependents. A large number of students living in these apartments are from foreign countries.
Plans are currently underway for changes and new residence halls, including studies overseen by Stange
to determine the ideal size of additional residence halls. Residence halls are moving towards single or
suite-style living arrangements. Long-term plans at UI may lead to housing for as many as 6,500
students. Anciaux asked for the number of freshmen and sophomores currently in residence halls. Jones
answered about 4,000 freshmen and 2,300 sophomores.
Hayek: Are numbers stable or expected to change, and has a decrease in number of triple rooms affected
residence halls? Jones reiterated that there has been no increase in classroom space, so no increase in
enrollment is expected. Graduation classes are gradually decreasing over the past decade, though Ul's
market share has stabilized. The number of triple rooms varies, and has increased in past few years in
order to accommodate incoming freshmen classes.
Hayek: What is the planned capacity of the new west side residence hall? Jones said that the needs are
still being assessed. Jones noted that the original plans were for 500 beds, but it may be anywhere from
250 to 500. He also said that the new space would be replacing some lost capacity due to a planned
renovation of Slater Hall. Stange added that the timeline for increasing overall residence hall capacity is
long, as the renovation of current facilities will take several years.
Hayek: Were numbers of students housed prior to the 1970's significantly different than current numbers,
or have they been consistent? Jones reported that there was a surge in numbers in the mid-1970's, but
nothing significant since. A large building boom in residence halls in 1960's, and during recent years due
to the renovation of older space. Unless universities are increasing enrollment size, there is little reason
to increase housing capacity.
Hayek inquired about the affordability of private market units for students and whether there has been any
change in the ability of an average student to rent in Iowa City. Jones reported that it appears to be easier
this year, as he has seen an increase in listings through the Housing Clearinghouse. He said that the
market seems to be softer right now as incentives are being offered by apartments in order to fill their
units. Jones also noted that market rates do not affect UI housing rates, as residence hall rates are
determined by costs. No State money is allocated for residence services, so residence halls must cover
all operational costs, including food, labor, and renovations.
Stutsman: Does UI do outreach to help students, such as Iow-income or foreign, to find housing? Jones
replied that foreign students typically live in University Apartments, and residence halls are the choice of
lower income students. Jones said the reality is that it is less expensive to live in residence hall with a
meal plan than in an apartment.
Hayek: Have there been changes in the affluence of students in past decade, thereby allowing students
to bypass less expensive university housing? Jones said that housing near the university has responded
to student demands, by improving the available housing and then renting at higher rates. Jones said that
some students could pay $500 to $600 per person, and these higher end units typically few vacancies.
Jones recommended consulting the landlords for more detailed information.
Anciaux: What does the University pay the school district for busing? Stange reported that the University
pays for busing to and from school for children from University Apartments, plus a subsidy to the school
district to cover tuition costs. Strange said that this subsidy payment is essentially in lieu of property
taxes. He said that last year the university paid $200,000 for busing, which varies from year to year, and
is based on the number of students in the ICCSD. Strange noted that the ICCSD students range from in
age from elementary to high school.
Hayek: Are University Apartments on west side of town the only apartments? Jones confirmed that those
are the only apartments supported by the University. The Parklawn building was recently converted to
housing for persons living alone.
Hayek: What are the plans for University Apartments? Jones said that all plans are on hold and the
capacity will be maintained at its current level, and the units will be kept safe and clean. He said that
studies are being done to determine what would be best improvements for that complex, but any
significant improvements would require raising the rent substantially or obtaining a large University
subsidy.
Scattered Site Housing Taskforoe Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 3
Jones also confirmed that based on numbers of students living in residence halls, and accounting for
numbers who live at home during school, between 24,000 to 25,000 students do not live in university
housing.
Hayek: Are statistics on housing website correct? If the numbers are correct it is estimated that 75% of
students live in housing provided by the private market live in iowa City, and 25% live in Coralville. Jones
did not know the proportion, nor did he have statistics on numbers of students living in the private market
or the number of those who have children.
Presentation by Iowa City Area Homebuilders Association
Smith began by thanking taskforce for inviting them to speak at the meeting, and stating that
homebuilders' goal is to build housing for all income levels. Current trends in the market are highlighted
by an increased interest in condos, as it is difficult for mid-range professionals to afford single-family
homes. Gordon added that it is more difficult to build affordable single-family homes, as land values and
raw material costs continue to rise. Condos and townhomes are more affordable and still give pride of
ownership.
Stutsman: Is there an increased demand for condos, or are multi-unit developments labeled as condos
after they are built, in order to capitalize on the market trends and tax assessment laws? Also, who tends
to live in condos? Gordon said there is currently a large demand for that type of housing. Developers
base decisions to sell or rent multi-unit buildings on a number of factors, such as demand and margins.
Some seniors live in condos, as well as grad students and residents, but majority are young graduated
singles or couples without children. Gordon's condos are located in the Saddlebrook subdivision on
southeast side of Iowa City.
Smith added that some people like condo living and are taking advantage of Iow interest rates. The
market is very soft and the market is "churning." One barrier to building is the development approval
process, specifically zoning, the design review process, and the approval timeline. The timeline varies,
depending on various factors, from weeks to over a year in process, and ail delays, reviews, and
submittals have costs to the developers.
Stutsman: Is there interest in the area for tract homes? AJso, are developers interested mainly in higher-
incoming housing? Smith replied that there is a correlation between amenities and costs. All developing is
speculative, and most people try to fit into a certain niche in the market in order to sell developments and
cover their overhead.
Gordon also noted that there are all kinds of development going on in the area, bo{h Iow and high income.
Zoning is an issue that impacts that. If a developer has an idea that fits into an existing zone, the process
is clearly laid out, but if the development doesn't fit into the zone, the process gets bogged down.
Developers will put multiple units following the same building plan into an area, but zoning determines
how much of this can be done in a given area. What developers build depends on what land they own
and what the zoning permits.
Hightshoe: Do you think the rewrite of the City's development code will make this better? Smith reported
developers are looking for more flexibility, and there is a shared goal that this will help serve. All the
restrictions bog the process down and ara not efficient for the developers or the City administrators.
Anciaux: What is the difference in the cost of land in Iowa City versus Coralville and North Liberty, and
how much of a percentage does the land cost figure into the total cost? Gordon repoded that land in
Coralville and North Liberty is more expensive than Iowa City. Approximately $35,000 per acre in North
Liberty, and with an average three houses on one acre, that makes the land cost about $10,000 to
$12,000 without infrastructure.
Stutsman: What is the average price of condos expected to sell this year? Gordon reported $90,000 to
$92,000. Hightshoe: Apart from approval process, what would help the City encourage development of
modest, affordable housing? Smith replied that "one-stop shopping" in the approval process, and more
flexible zoning. Also establishing a shared vision on how the community will develop. Agreement on
Building Code interpretation.
Hightshoe: Are building codes between Coralville and Iowa City the same? Smith said that they agree for
the most part, though everyone has their own interpretation on different aspects. Estimates that at a
minimum Iowa City, Coralville, and North Liberty all adhering to 2001 International Building Code.
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 4
Hayek: Would like to give more context of the taskforce and background. The taskforce is responding to
concerns expressed at the City level about concentrations of Iow-income housing. He said that the
taskforce is to evaluate whether there is a concentration of subsidized housing and what the impact of
these concentrations may be. Hayek is also interested in developing a working definition for
"concentration" in this context. Also, Hayek said that the taskforce may be making recommendations on
how the City could look at this issue, rather than coming up with specific Development Code or changes
to the approval process. Last, do the homebuilders think there is a concentration of this type of housing?
Smith responded that based on the theory of economy of scale, there are concentrations of Iow income
housing due to condo or apartment complexes. However, this may not be what the taskforce is looking
for. Zero-lot and duplexes are scattered throughout the city.
Hightshoe: What would entice developers to devote a percentage of their developments to affordable/Iow
income housing? Smith reported that incentives would vary between groups. What sort of housing is also
influenced by what kinds of buildings will work within the character of the development,
Anxiaux: What sorts of housing are the area developers able and willing to supply? Smith responded that
they can meet any demand. Gordon added that there is an interest in supplying modest housing.
Peterson: What is "modest?" Anthony said modest would be 1/3 below the median value of housing in the
community. Gordon also responded that developers respond to the demands of the market, and that
mixed-income housing areas do exist in Iowa City, such as the Saddlebrook subdivision.
Hayek: Why isn't there more mixed-income housing areas? Gordon replied that it is difficult to do in many
areas because of existing zoning. Hayek inquired whether developers would do more if there was a
change in the regulations, and Gordon agreed that they would,
Hayek: Would developers build more mixed-income housing areas as opPosed to something more
lucrative? Gordon responded that they would, because they will build what will sell. Smith noted that there
are neighborhood issues to take into consideration with that as well.
Hightshoe: Is there an interest or need for small-lot zoning? Smith replied that "small" would have to be
defined. Also, the question is what features the purchasers want. Again, zoning figures into the problem.
Anthony: What is the primary determiner in different land prices? Gordon said zoning and location are
key, so comparable homes would be priced differently according to desirable location, such as near
schools. Tiemeyer agreed that location is primary consideration.
Stutsman: Is there currently a way for homebuilders to communicate with government agencies? Would
meetings between the two groups be beneficial? Smith replied that the primary communication comes
through letters. Gordon agreed that having regular meetings would be a positive step.
Anthony: Are there any thoughts or theories regarding the increased percentage of income going to
housing? Smith responded that the transient nature of the population may be a factor, but he doesn't
know for sure. There are many possible reasons for this trend. Gordon noted that the students drive up
the average. Tiemeyer added that another reason is the demand for increasing quality and amenities in
housing.
Anthony: Is there any census data available on housing in the area? Tiemeyer replied that she does not
have data with her, but suggested sending specific questions to the Association In writing, and they would
be able to gather data for the taskforce.
Presentation by Heather MacDonald
MacDonald opened by explaining that she has done studies on the State's housing markets, and that
individuals may contact her for a copy of the most recent housing study, or check on the website. The
major question seems to be why Johnson County is so unaffordable. A "fair market" is defined as 40% of
all apartments renting below a certain rate, which is determined by figuring a "housing income" of what
income a family would have to receive to afford an affordable unit, defined in this case as a 2 bedroom
apartment. Johnson County's housing income has risen steadily. In 2000, this income was $11.60 per
hour. In 2003, it was $11.83. By contrast, in Des Moines the income was $12.60. Question remains why
Johnson County is so different.
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 5
There is a perception that the top end of the housing market has been competed away, so homebuilders
are more interested in serving lower income needs. Iowa City has a very Iow vacancy rate, between 1
and 1.5%. Median-income housing has had more active development in Iowa City relatively recently.
Slide 1: Analysis of vacancy rates, median home prices, growth of new housing units, and population
growth. Slide illustrates that Johnson County is growing rapidly, as derived from population growth,
housing units, and Iow vacancy rates. North Liberty is in stable growth rate, indicated by moderate
vacancy rates (3%), moderate house prices, and moderate rates of new units and population growth.
Southeast of Iowa City is stable, and Coralville has an area of stagnant, characterized by high vacancy
rates and Iow housing costs, much of it old stock in the process of being redeveloped. This area is by
Highway 6 and the Iowa River.
Much more of Johnson County is in the rapidly growing category, which is very different than Cedar
Rapids and other larger cities. Noted that the information on all of the slides is census data, so a few
years old.
Slide 2: Percent of homeowners that pay more than 35% of their income for housing costs.
Thirty-five percent (35%) is a higher figure than federal government uses, but generally is the upper limit
that banks will allow when considering a loan. There are areas in Johnson County where 15% of all
households are cost burdened. The state average is 9%. The data looks at income against housing
prices. The railroad tracks roughly divided areas of less and more burdened households.
Slide 3: Rental information
Statewide, approximately 28% of renters are cost burdened or pay more than 35% of their income for
housing. Students may skew the data on rentals in the downtown area. Data indicates that between 25%
and 50% of renters are paying a .significant amount in housing costs. Affordable rental markets exist in
Linn and Washington counties.
Possible reasons for this situation may include the employment base of the county, which is primarily
service and depends on a large base of relatively Iow-paid employees. Iowa City industry includes
service, information, education, and healthcare, which are different than other larger cities in the sate.
Dichotomy in salaries is evident most strongly in the healthcare industry with highly paid professionals
versus the lower-income support personnel. Relatively small high-income population pushes up costs for
all.
Slide 4: Where is affordable housing located in Iowa City?
Defined as rentals leasing for fair-market rate or less. Affordable owner-occupied housing defined as
affordable for households earning 80% of median income or 50% of median income, depending on where
they fell on the continuum. Definition also assumes no significant debt, a 5% down payment, and an
interest rate of 6%. For a four-person household earning $43,500, this would come to a $160,000 home.
For a household at 50% of median income, it would be a house at approximately $110,000.
Rentals that fall within these guidelines fell mostly on the east side of Iowa City, where 35-50% of the
apartments are affordable. Also a number of affordable units can be found in north Iowa City and in
Coralville.
Slide 5: Analysis of 3 bedroom apartments
They are distributed differently. South and east side had higher concentration of affordable units, with
units becoming less affordable nearer to downtown. North Liberty provides more affordable units.
The taskforce had a question on the number of units available per the data MacDonald collected.
MacDonald responded that data on the slide reflects percentage of units available rather than actual
numbers, though she can get that data. Anciaux requested that data be forwarded to the taskforce.
Slide 6: Owner-occupied units selling for $110,000 or less
More than 50% of units in the south part of Iowa City would be affordable. Near the river and west side is
not very affordable, and the north side has somewhat more affordable housing. Noted that this data is
based on the census, so does not reflect the more recent developments on the east side of Iowa City,
such as large increase in condos.
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 6
Note that subsidized housing developments have not been a large effort in Iowa City. Many of the
affordable houses in the affordable southern zone fall along the Hollywood Blvd area, where many homes
are older. MacDonald added that manufactured homes fall in this category as well.
Hayek: requested clarification - data seems to be showing that them is not a high percentage of new
housing in the affordable range, but reflected primarily in the areas with older homes? MacDonald
agreed, but added that even in 2000, some areas such as North Liberty and Tiffin with higher rates of
new, affordable housing. At time the study was done, many of the condos and zero-lot homes had not yet
been built in Iowa City.
MacDonald approached queslion of what concentrations do. Homebuilders have some good suggestions,
such as streamlining the approval process. There are pros and cons to regulations. Higher regulation can
be attractive to those looking for a good investment in the community. A streamlined process and one-
stop shopping especially geared towards developments that set aside a certain portion of their units for
affordable housing would be attractive to the developers and a fair trade-off for the city for community
development.
More dialogue and marketing of diverse housing could be geared to address neighborhood issues and
local opposition to developments of lower income housing in particular areas. This is not a significant
problem yet, but in the long run it would be beneficial if more neighborhoods provided more choices. More
variability is a good thing.
Some communities have succeeded in bringing consensus on diverse housing issues, often with help
from state legislation. Emphasis can be focused on growth and community management, to prevent
urban sprawl and the impact on the environment. Housing integration can be a draw for the community.
Hayek: What has caused this polarization? MacDonald responded that it reflects nationwide trends.
increasing dichotomy in incomes, community growth, and changes in the local culture are all contributing
factors. Also people who move into area from other states with different economic situations are
purchasing larger and more expensive homes.
Hayek: Would a change in local economy to more of a manufacturing base provide a higher minimum
wage? MacDonald replied that it can, but Cedar Rapids for example has moved to more of a white-collar
base. Economic development professionals generally don't think manufacturing is the answer to the
problem. Iowa City is poised to be on the leading edge of information industry.
MacDonald noted that there are possibilities in roles of the local companies can take in helping to house.
In other cities, some companies contribute to a housing trust fund that can help subsidize moderately
priced housing. Mayo Clinic does this, not to help doctors, but the other professionals and support
personnel. This subsidy may assist with down payment. Stutsman cited example of Coral Ridge mall,
which was essentially subsidized by citizens statewide.
Hayek: In terms of the cost burdens of Johnson County, summarize two or three suggestions for the city
to consider. MacDonald responded to consider workforce housing employer-based linkage fees, in a trust
fund for example, to assist with housing costs for lower-income employees. Develop comprehensive plan
to outline how individual neighborhoods are going to meet the need for affordable housing, on the
assumption that there should be fair-share housing throughout the community. Come to an agreement on
a minimum share of this activity, which might involve rezoning land for higher-density housing.
Noted that there are some architectural designs that might allow for multi-unit buildings that look like large
houses. MacDonald added that positive marketing to make this more acceptable for more affluent areas.
Finally, streamlining the process and allowing for one-stop shopping will help with costs, especially as an
incentive for developers who designate a portion of their activities to affordable housing.
Finally, consider modular housing, as it can look very nice and be inexpensive. Anciaux noted that while
state law makes discrimination against modular homes illegal, issues could be raised if the home arrives
at the lot on wheels. The covenant to the deed may prohibit homes arriving on wheels.
Hayek thanked MacDonald for presenting, and may ask her to come back. MacDonald noted she will
send the maps with the actual number of housing units.
MacDonald said the UI website showing these slides, and more information on the study, is
http://planning.urban.uiowa.edu/iowa2000.
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 7
OTHER BUSINESS
Hayek handed out suggested study/deliberation guide, to be addressed at the next meeting. Requested
that research materials be read by September 20 meeting, in order to begin discussing. There is no public
hearing on September 20. The realtors and neighborhood council will be presenting, and begin
discussion to create definitions. Public hearing tentatively set for October 4.
Anciaux requested additional information. Hayek asked him to email or call.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business to come before the taskforce, Vandenburg moved to adjourn. Anthony
seconded, and the motion passed uncontested. Meeting was adjourhed at 7:40 pm.
S/Pcd/rnin utes/ecodev/2OO4/8-30-o4$sht
MINUTES
SCATTERED SITE HOUSING TASKFORCE
AUGUST 30, 2004
CITY HALL, LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
" Don Anciaux, Jerry Anthony, Darlene Clausen, Matthew Hayek,
Jan Left, Jan Peterson, Sally StutSman
MEMBERS ISENT: Joan Vandenberg
STAFF PRE. Tracy Hightshoe, Steve Rackis
OTHERS Phil Jones, Von Stange (ResidenCe Services
Steve Gordon, Dan Smith, Joan 'Fiemeyer Homebuilders Assoc.)
MacDonald (Professor, Urban ional Planning, UI)
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Hayek called the r~ order at 5:10
Approval of Au,qust 2, 2004 and Au<
MOTION: A motion was made by Anciaux by Stptsman to approve the August 2 Minutes with
corrections of typographical carried 7-0.
Hayek requested deferral of approval of 16 Minutes, as he did not receive them. All agreed.
Stutsman noted that alternative Minute August: 16 was easier to read and preferable to the
previous format.
Presentation by Iowa
Phil Jones and Von Stange of of Iowa Services presented data on students
housed by the University. Start reported that .'e halls have been at or over capacity for
approximately the last '10 years, halls house freshman and sophomores, and the UI is
committed to housing all freshman to assist withtransition to college life. UI also maintains
694 - 2 BR apartment units west side of cam -65% of the occupants being married.
Hayek: What have been changes and trends in studenl r~using, and how does enrollment affect
on-campus housing? Also/~ are percentages of students in U.I housing versus the private market?
What impact do the students have on the private market?
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 2
residence halls, but apartments are available for married students, where priority is given to students with
de A large number of students living in these apadments are from foreign countries.
PI~ are currently underway for changes and new residenCe halls, including studies overseen by Sta:
to the ideal size of additional residence halls. I~sidence halls are moving towards sin~ or
living arrangements. Long-term plans at UI may lead to housing for as many 500
studenb asked for the number of freshmen and sophomores currently in residence Jones
answered ,out 4,000 freshmen and 2,300 sophomores.
Hayek: Are ~bers stable or expected to change, and has a decrease in number of tripl~ affected
residence hall Jones reiterated that there has been no increase in classroom space, no increase in
enrollment is ex Graduation classes are gradually decreasing over the past though Ul's
market share has ]bilized. The number of triple rooms varies, and has increase, past few years in
order to accon' incoming freshmen classes.
Hayek: What is the ed capacity of the new west side residence hall? Jot said that the needs are
still being assessed. Jof noted that the original plans were for 500 beds it may be anywhere from
250 to 500. He also sai ,at the new space would be replacing some capacity due to a planned
renovation of Slater Hall. ~ge added that the timeline for increasing residence hall capacity is
long, as the renovation nt facilities will take several years.
Hayek: Were numbers of stu, housed prior to the 1970"s signifi( different than current numbers,
or have they been consistent? ~s reported that there was a s~ in numbers in the mid-1970's, but
nothing significant since. A large ding boom in residence 1960's, and during recent years due
to the renovation of older space, universities are enrollment size, there is little reason
to increase housing capacity.
Hayek inquired about the affordability of and whether there has been any
change in the ability of an average ) rent in Iowa Jones reported that it appears to be easier
this year, as he has seen an increase in the Housing Clearinghouse. He said that the
market seems to be softer right now as being offered by apartments in order to fill their
units. Jones also noted that market rates do UI housing rates, as residence hall rates are
determined by costs. No State money is residence services, so residence halls must cover
all operational costs, including food, ~tions.
Stutsman: Does UI do outreach to help studer as 10w-income or foreign, to find housing? Jones
replied that foreign students typically live in adments, and residence halls are the choice of
lower income students. Jones said the rea ! is that it ess expensive to live in residence hall wi~h a
meal plan than in an apartment.
Hayek: Have there been changes in of studer past decade, thereby allowing students
to bypass less exl: ? Jones said that sing near the university has responded
to student demands, by improving the housing and ;nting at higher rates. Jones said that
some students could pay $500 to per person, and these end units typically few vacancies.
Jones recommended consulting th s for more detailed
Anciaux: What does the Univers the school district for '~ge reported that the University
pays for busing to and from for children from plus a subsidy to the school
district to cover tuition costs e said that this subsidy payment ssentially in lieu of property
taxes, He said that last university paid $200,000 for busing, which from year to year, and
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 3
Jones also confirmed that based on numbers of students :living in residence halls, and accounting
umbers who live at home during school, between 24,000i to 25,000 students do not live in
Ha ~: Are statistics on housing website correct? If the numbers are correct it is estimated of
live in housing provided by the private market live i~ Iowa City, and 25% live in Jones
did ow the proportion, nor did he have statistics on nui'nbers of students living in the market
or the have children.
Iowa City Area Homebuilders Association
Smith began thanking taskforce for inviting them tO speak at the and staling that
homebuilders' is to build housing for all income levels.. Current trends in are highlighted
by an increased in condos, as it is difficult for mid-range professior to afford single-family
homes. Gordon that it is more difficult to build affordable as land values and
raw material costs tinue to rise. Condos and townhomes are more and still give pride of
ownership.
Stutsman: Is there an demand for condos, or are labeled as condos
after they are built, in capitalize on the market trends and laws? Also, who tends
to live in condos? Gordon there is currently a large demand that type of housing. Developers
base decisions to sell or rent buildings on a number of such as demand and margins.
Some seniors live in condos, as grad students and resi but majority are young graduated
singles or couples without Gordon's condos are: in the Saddlebrook subdivision on
southeast side of Iowa City.
Smith added that some people like 3do living and advantage of Iow interest rates. The
market is very soft and the market is lurning." One to building is the development approval
process, specifically zoning, the design proces= the approval timeline. The timeline varies,
depending on various factors, from wee to over year in process, and all delays, reviews, and
submittals have costs to the developers.
Stutsman: Is there interest in the area for AlsO, are developers interested mainly in higher-
incoming housing? Smith replied that there is a between amenities and costs. All developing is
speculative, and most people try to fit into a liche in!the market in order to sell developments and
cover their overhead. ~
Gordon also noted lhat there are all kinds of ~l geing on in the area, both Iow and high income.
Zoning is an issue that impacts that. If a d~ idea that fits into an existing zone, the process
is clearly laid out, but if the developm, doesn't fit the zone, the process gets bogged down.
Developers will put multiple units the same plan into an area, but zoning determines
how much of this can be done in a gi area. What. build depends on what land they own
and what the zoning permits.
Hightshoe: Do you think the the City's develol: will make this better? Smith reported
developers are looking for more and there is a oal that this will help serve. Ail the
restrictions bog the process are not efficient for the devek ;ity administrators.
Anciaux: What is the the cost of land in Iowa City Coralville and North Liberty, and
how much of a percentage the land cost figure into ~the total Gordon reported that land in
Coralville and North Liberty more expensive than Iowa Oily, ~ly $35,000 per acre in North
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 4
Hayek: Would like to give more context of the taskforce and background. The taskforce is responding to
expressed at the City level about concentratiorls of Iow-income housing. He said that
is to evaluate whether there is a concentration of subsidized housing and what the
concentrations may be. Hayek is also interested in developing a working definiti
in this context. Also, Hayek said that the taskforce may be making on
how thl ~ could look at this issue, rather than coming up with specific Development Code es
to the ~ process. Last, do the homebuilders think there is a concentration of this typ, housing?
Smith that based on the theory of economy of scale, there are concentratio of Iow income
housing due or apartment complexes. However, this may not be what the is looking
for. Zero-lot and are scattered throughout the city.
Hightshoe: What d entice developers to devote a percentage of their d{ to affordable/Iow
income housing? reported that incentives would vary between greu sort of housing is also
influenced by what kin gs will work within the character of the ~ment.
Anxiaux: What sorts are the area developers able and willing Smith responded that
they can meet any ~ordon added that there is an ir~terest in su modest housing.
Peterson: What is "modest?", said modest would be 1/3 median value of housing in the
community. Gordon also res ed that developers respond to demands of the market, and that
mixed-income housing in Iowa City, such as the Sa( 3division.
Hayek: Why isn't there more housing areas? replied that it is difficult to do in many
areas because of existing zoning, inquired whether would do more if there was a
change in the regulations, and Gordon 'eed that
Hayek: Would developers build more h areas as opposed to something more
lucrative? Gordon responded that the, because 1 ' will build what will sell. Smith noted that there
are neighborhood issues to take into consid as well.
Hightshoe: Is there an interest or need for sm~ Smith replied that "small" would have to be
defined. Also, the question is what features the ~asers want. Again, zoning figures into the problem.
Anthony: What is the primary determiner in di and prices? Gordon said zoning and location are
key, so comparable homes would be aacording to desirable location, such as near
schools. Tiemeyer agreed that location is pri
Stutsman: Is there currently a way for to with government agencies? Would
meetings between the two groups be Smith that the primary communication comes
through letters. Gordon agreed that h regular meetin d be a positive step.
Anthony: Are there any thoughts regarding the percentage of income going to
housing? Smith responded that th nature of the! may be a factor, but he doesn't
know for sure. There are many reasons for this trend, noted that the students drive up
the average. Tiemeyer added another reason is the demand for quality and amenities in
housing.
Anthony: Is there any available on housing in the area? Tieme~er replied that she does not
have data with her, but su sending specific questions to the Associatio~
be able to gather data for taskforce.
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 5
There is a perception that the top end of the housing market has been competed away, so homebuilders
are more interested in serving lower income needs. Iowa City has a very Iow vacancy rate,
1.5%. Median-income housing has had more active development in Iowa City relativel,
Analysis of vacancy rates, median home prices, growth of new housing units, and )ulation
ide illustrates that Johnson County is growing ~rapidly, as derived from popul growth,
housing and Iow vacancy rates. North Liberty is in stable growth rate, moderate
vacanc' moderate house prices, and moderate rates of new units and popu growth.
Southeast City is stable, and Coralville has an area of stagnant, by high vacancy
rates and Iow ']g costs, much of it old stock in the process of being )ed. This area is by
Highway 6 and thl River.
Much more of John,~ County is in the rapidly growing category, which different than Cedar
Rapids and other Noted that the information on all of the is census data, so a few
years old.
Slide 2: Percent pay more than 35% of their ' for housing costs.
Thirty-five percent (35%) is ute than federal but generally is the upper limit
that banks will allow when ~idering a loan. There are area Johnson County where 15% of all
households are cost state average is 9%. data looks at income against housing
prices. The railroad tracks rivided areas of less ,~ned households.
Slide 3: Rental information
Statewide, approximately 28% of "s are cost burd, or pay more than 35% of their income for
housing. Students may skew the data rentals in the area. Data indicates that between 25%
and 50% of renters are paying a amount costs. Affordable rental markets exist in
Linn and Washington counties.
Possible reasons for this situation may base of the county, which is primarily
service and depends on a large base of Iow-plaid employees. Iowa City industry includes
service, information, education, and are different than other larger cities Jn the sate.
Dichotomy in salaries is evident most strongl ~e healthcare industry with highly paid professionals
versus the lower-income support personnel, small high-income population pushes up costs for
all.
Slide 4: Where is affordable housing Iowa C
Defined as rentals leasing for fair-mar rate or less. owner-occupied housing defined as
affordable for households earning income ~ income, depending on where
they fell on the continuum, assumes no Iqcant debt, a 5% down payment, and an
interest rate of 6%. For a four- earning ~0, this would come to a $160,000 home.
For a household at 50% of median :ome, it would be a approximately $110,000.
Rentals that fall within these gui lines fell mostly on the east of Iowa City, where 35-50% of the
apartments are affordable, number of affordable units found in north Iowa City and in
Coralville.
Slide 5: Analysis of 3 )artments
They are distributed South and east side had hioher cot of affordable units, with
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 6
~ that subsidized housing developments have not been a large effort in Iowa City. Many of th
Jses in the affordable southern zone fall along the Hollywood Bird area, where many he
are MacDonald added that manufactured homes fall in this category as well.
Hayek: ~ested clarification - data seems to be showing that there is not a high of new
housing affordable range, but reflected primarily in the areas with older homes d
agreed, that even in 2000, some areas such as North Liberty and Tiffin her rates of
new, housing. At time the study was done, many of the condos and zero-lot I had not yet
been built in City.
MacDonald a lcantrations do; Homebuilders have ~ good suggestions,
such as streamlinin process. There are pros and cons to Higher regulation can
be attractive to 9oking for a good investment in the community. A sl process and one-
stop shopping t geared towards developments that set aside a portion of their units for
affordable housing be attractive to the developers and a fair the city for community
development.
More dialogue and of diverse housing could be geared address neighborhood issues and
local opposition to of lower income housing in p~ areas. This is not a significant
problem yet, but in the long it would be beneficial if more provided more choices. More
variability is a good thing.
Some communities have ,=d in bringing consensu diverse housing issues, often with help
from state legislation. Emphasis be focused on and community management, to prevent
urban sprawl and the impact on the ~t. Hou can be a draw for the community.
Hayek: What has caused this MacDc d responded that it reflects nationwide trends.
Increasing dichotomy in incomes, changes in the local culture are all contributing
factors. Aisc people who move into states with different economic situations are
purchasing larger and more expensive ho
Hayek: Would a change in local economy of a manufacturing base provide a higher minimum
wage? MacDonald replied that it can, but CE ' Rapids for example has moved to more of a white-collar
base, Economic development ~erally doter think manufacturing is the answer to the
problem. Iowa City is poised to be on the of information industry.
MacDonald noted that there are possib in of the local companies can take in helping to house.
In other cities, some companies to a ing trust fund that can help subsidize moderately
priced housing. Mayo Clinic does not to help but the other professionals and support
personnel. This subsidy may assr down Stutsman cited example of Coral Ridge mall,
which was essentially subsidized citizens statewide.
Hayek: In terms of the cost bur on County, tmarize two or three suggestions for the city
to consider. MacDonald respc to consider workforce 'rig employer-based linkage fees, in a trust
fund for example, to assist, housing costs for Iower-incom~ Develop comprehensive plan
h '
to outline how individual borhoods are going to meet [r'~ need for affordable housing on the
assumption that there sh( be fair-share housing throughout the'~ommunity. Come to an agreement on
a minimum share of this ty which might involve rezoning land f'~higher-density housing.
Noted that there are ,.hi [ectural designs that might allow for mi~ti-unit buildings that look like large
houses. MacDonald that positive marketing to make this reas.
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce Minutes
August 30, 2004
Page 7
OTHER BU.___SINESS
handed out suggested study/deliberation guide, to be addressed at the next meeting,
be read by September 20 meeting, ia order to begin discussing. The no public
September 20. The realtors and neighborhood council will be presen and begfn
discu~ create definitions. Public hearing tentatively set for October 4,
Anciaux ~d additional information. Hayek asked him to email or call.
ADJO~
There being no business to come before the taskfo~rce, Vandenbuf to adjourn. Anthony
seconded, and the passed uncontested. Meeting was adjourned at pm.
SIPcd/minutes/ecodevl2OO418..30-O4ssht
Scattered Site Housing Taskforce
Attendance Record
2004
04/29 05/12 05/17 06/07 06/21 07/12 07/19 08/02 08/16 08/30 09/20 10/04 10/18 11/01 11/15 12/06 12/20
D. Anciaux X X X X X O/E O/E X X X
J. Anthony X O/E X X X X O/E X X X
D. Clausen X X X X X X X X O/E X
M. Hayek X X X X X X X X X X
J. Left X X X X X X X X X X
J. Peterson X X X X O/E X X O/E X X
S. Stntsman O/E X X X X O/E X O/E O/E X
VandenBerg X X X X X X X X X O/E
Key:
X = Present
0 = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = No Meeting
..... Not a Member