HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-11-19 Bd Comm minutesMINUTES
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 - 5:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Cordell Jeppsen, Betty McKray, Eric Rothenbuhler, Steve Hoch and
Howie Vernon
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Shaffer, Brau, Helling, Dilkes, Hardy, Wood
Ren6 Paine, Derek Maurer, Barb Black, Mary Jo Langhorne, Bill
Blough
SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION
Blough reported the Fox News Channel will be added to'the channel line up. The rebuild is
progressing on schedule. Paine reported PATV will hold an access forum to gather information
on what the community wants in regard to local programming. Shaffer will speak on the history
of access at this forum, Dilkes reported the City has started work'on developing of a telecom-
munications ordinance, Helling reported Coralville is ready to sign the contract with PATV.
Shaffer reported a portion of the pass-through funds have been transferred to the library and the
Senior Center for equipment gurchases as agreed upon by the parties and the BTC. Due to a
slight miscalculation by TCI in dete~T~ining their maximum cap rate the City Council will be asked
to pass a resolution setting the maximum rate at a lower level to ensure future rate increases start
from an accurate level. The change will not impact the curren~ subscriber rates but would affect
future rates. Helling clarified the relationship of the Commission, the City Council and City staff.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Hoch, seconded by Rothenbuhler to approve the July 22, 1996 minutes. The
motion passed unanimously, .,.
ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMISSIONERS
Rothenbuhler said that as a citizen he appreciates th~ Ci~ changing the Police Department's
policy on entering buildings and the consideration of a citizen review board, He is d~smayed,
however, that Officer Gillespie was put on paid administrative leave when the Johnson County
Attorney said there was no justification for the shooting.
SHORT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
TCI REPORT
Blough reported the Fox News Channel will be carried on channel 23 beginning October 7th.
TCI's delinquent payment policy has been changed, Termination of service had been at sixty (60)
days past due, now it will be at 45 days. TCI has seen an increase in the number of delinquent
accounts and hopes to reduce them be half with this measure. TCI notifies delinquent account
holders by card and phone prior to disconnection. The rebuild is on schedule. It is anticipated
that money will be allocated soon and the design phase will begin. A neighborhood by neighbor-
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
September 30, 1996
Page 2.
hood construction schedule will be submitted to the City within the next two months. There are
two major phases to the rebuild t the construction of the fiber backbone and the upgrade of
subscriber traps. Additional channels may not be put on the system all at one time due to the
need for subscriber surveys, The Iowa City system has a potential for revenues from telephony
services. Direct broadcast satellite subscriptions are growing in Iowa City. DBS subscribers
frequently switch services to obtain the channels TCI doesn't carry. They often continue to
subscribe to the basic Cable 'IV tier. For TCI to offer phone service it must meet 911 reliability
standards of 99.9999%. TCl currently runs at about 99.92%, The fiber rebuild will increase
reliability. In addition, subscriber drops will be upgraded so connectors are at the house rather
that at the pole and will be designed to be permanent rather than connected and disconnected
as is the current practice.
LIBRARY REPORT
Barb Black reported the library has received $12,700 from the pass-through funds account for the
purchase of equipment for Meeting Room A. The government channel staff has been providing
assistance with the purchase planning. The library is celebrating intellectual freedom festival this
week.
PATV REPORT
Paine reported the appendix to their contract which outlines services to Coralville is ready to be
signed. PATV's new series program season begins tomorrow. Staff-assisted series proposals
are being accepted through Fdday. The next newsletter will be out witl~in the next couple weeks.
An access forum for producers and the community as a whole will be held October 13th from 1:00
to 3:00 p.m. in Library Meeting Room C of the Iowa City Public Library. The forum will focus on
what particil:fart~ would like access to be in Iowa City. 'It-is hoped the access forums can be held
once a month. ,~'he~/Will bedcaped and played back during PATV's Access Update with live call-in
potential. Maurer reported several strong candidates have come forward to serve on the PATV
Board. Additional candidates are being sought. Several terms expire in November. Barb Black
reported that PA']'V's space in the library is secure for the indefinite future while the library
expansion is being determined.
LEGAL REPORT
Dilkes reported the City has received the proposal from Rice, Williams to assist the City in
developing a telecommunications ordinance. A meeting was held with staff from Cable, Public
Works and Planning & Zoning to discuss issues related to the ordinance. Dilkes said she
received a letter today from the U.S. Justice Department regarding her inquiries into possible anti-
trust violations in the joint efforts of Sprint and TCI. The Justice Department found their was no
ant-competitive effect and thus no violation of anti-trust laws: '
ECC REPORT
Langhorne reported that she and Mike Haverkamp attended the training sessions at the Denver
TCI facilities and found them quite valuable. She thanked Tel for sponsoring the training. The
ECC September meeting was canceled so discussions on how to get Kirkwood's listings included
with the school's program schedule listing in the Press-Citizen won't be taken up until the next
meeting.
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
September 30, 1996
Page 3
CABLE TELEVISION ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
Shaffer followed up on Dilkes' report regarding the City's initial steps towards the development
of a telecommunications ordinance. Helling said the issues involved in the ordinance involve a
number of departments. Helling has started to get those affected together to discuss the issues.
Helling said the Commission is welcome to have a representative atlend future meetings. The
focus of the ordinance is primarily on the regulation of the public right-of-way.
Hoch asked what the City can do and what needs to be done to encourage competition. Helling
said the cable franchise is not exclusive and any potential cable competitor could enter the
market, If competition is to come for telecommunications services or telephone companies
providing video services, the City could make it known that the City is open to competition, while
Iowa City is a small enough market it is likely well down the list of desirable areas for competitors.
The same is likely true for cable companies providing telephone services. Rothenbuhler said he
is concerned that it may not be a good time to encourage competition until it is known who the
players might be and what the City has control over. Jeppsen said the City needs to be aware
of any opportunities to appropriately and in a timely manner irarite any service providers which
would be of benefit to citizens. There are questions how quickly and when is the best time to
strive for additional providers. Shaffer said it is important for cities to examine how to regulate
the public right-of-way. Cities are proceeding in a variety of ways and the best means need to
be determined for Iowa City. Jeppsen said the Commission should receive reports on the
progress of the telecommunication ordinance. Shaffer reported that regarding encouraging
competition. the City was held up from encouraging competition dudng the refranchising process.
The City could at this time let it be known that is was interested in having a competitor come to
town. The BTC requested a recommendation from Shaffer regarding competition to the current
Cable TV scenario. Shaffer reported receiving 22 complaints as of July 22nd -- one about
programming, two about a poor signal, five about rates, one about,service, three about the billing
cycle, one about sales techniques, two about number of channels on the system.
Hardy reported the Media Unit is gearing up to deal with community programming. In addition
to the candidates forums covered by Channel 4, candidates for all offices will be given the
opportunity to submit short videotapes or have the Media Unit produce a short four minute spot
for them to run on the channel. McKray asked if Channel 4 cablecasted the City's press confer-
ence on the Shaw shooting. Hardy said it was requested to be taped, but not cablecast. A copy
was sent to the library for the public. Jeppsen said that even though KCRG-TV carried the press
conference live, he would expect that government channel viewers would have expected to have
been able to view it on Channel 4. Hardy said Channel 4 generally doesn't cover press confer-
ences as the government channel doesn't function as a member of the press. Vernon asked
about covering the Old Brick Forum. Hardy said the Press. Citizen, a profit making company,
sponsored the forum making it fall outside the government channel's mission of assisting non-
profits. Hoch asked if the Press-Citizen had produced a tape and given it to the government
channel for cablecasting would Channel 4 run it. Helling said this would be a difficult case as the
government channel doesn't want to become like public access. Hoch noted that the Old Brick
Forum does fall within the current Channel 4 guidelines. Vernon said he believes the Old Brick
Forum should have been carried on the government channel.
PATV CONTRACT RENEWAL
Helling said the contract with PATV has been signed. The Appendix outlining Coralville's
concerns is ready and Coralville will sign the contract shortly.
Broadband Telecommunications Commission
September 30. 1996
Page 4
PASS THROUGH FUNDS
Shaffer reported funds had been transferred to the Senior Center and the library. The community
programmer position has been advertised. 24 applications were received. Demo tapes will be
reviewed and interviews conducted shortly. The Community Television Group will meet to discuss
the Community Programming Advisory Committee. Plans for a joint facility are on hold until it is
known on how the library and the City Council are going to proceed with the expansion of the
library. Jeppsen asked a report be included in the Commission packets keeping them up-to-date
on the pass-through funds and their expenditures.
RATE REGULATION
Shaffer reported that the Rice, Williams analysis of TCI's rate increase indicated there was a
discrepancy in the calculation in the maximum cap rate. TCI is charging less than legally,
permitted. A resolution will be forwarded to the City Council setting the cap at the correct levels
as it forms the basis for future rate calculations. In regards to commercial rates, the City has
determined that they lack the authority to compel TCI to charge the same rates for businesses
as households and the FCC no longer considers this a priority matter. A letter will be sent to
affected businesses.
GOVERNMENT CHANIqEL GUIDELINES
Vernon moved and Hoch seconded a motion to defer the government channel guidelines until the
next meeting. The motion passed unanimously. ,-
BTC RELATIONSHIP TO CITY STAFF AND CITY COUNCIL
Jeppsen said the question was raised at the last Commission meeting about what is expected
of the Commission and the relation of the Commission to the City Council and City staff. Helling
said the Commission is essentially an advisory committee to the City Council. In that capacity
staff support is needed. Some Commission functions are clearly spelled out in the City Code
such as the triennial review. Other responsibilities such as making recommendations, are less
clear. It is up to the Council and the Commission to jointly or separately decide what kinds of
issues the Commission will be involved with. The responsibilities of staff are to give the Commis-
sion the support needed to help them make recommendations. This is different from the Library
Board or the Airport Commission which have operational responsibilities. The City Cable 'IV
Office falls under the operational responsibilities of the City Manager. The Commission ~s quasi-
judicial like the Human Right Commission in that there is an administrative procedure for hearing
public complaints. Jeppsen said the by-laws state the purpose of the Commission is to "faolitate
and regulate the ... network", Helling said that that language dates back 16 years and the
Commission has lost a lot of the authority to regulate the cable system. Jeppsen said that even
in the regulation of rates, while the Commission has advises Council its the Council who actually
asserts the regulatory authority. Helling said the Commission should not worry about making
requests of City staff. Vemon said in regard to pass-through expenditures there was some
confusion if the Commission made the decision or if the Council needed to address the ~ssue.
Helling said at times the staff has presented items to the Council in a way they could adopt a
recommendation without creating a separate agenda item to be passed at a formal meeting. This
is a streamlining procedure used sometimes in the cases in which it is anticipated the Counol will
not have need for discussion and passage is certain. Helling said he misunderstood the Council's
disposition on this issue.
Broadband Telecommunicetions Commission
September 30, 1996
Page 5
ADJOURNMENT
It was morned by Hoch, seconded by Rothenbuhler to adjourn. The motion passed unanimously.
Adjournment at 7:00 P.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Cable Television Administrator
MINUTES
IOWA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1996 - 4:30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER - COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRELIMINARY
Subject to Approval
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:'
STAFF PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
Lowell Brandt, Patricia Eckhardt, William Haigh, T~m Lehman
Susan Bender
Melody Rockwell. Sarah Holecek
Shirley Young, Nancy Dooley,,Joe Helland~ Cris Watt, Doug Paul,
Dan Tiedt ..
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Eckhardt called the meeting to order at 4:33 p.m.
CONSIDERATION OF THE SEPTEMBER 11, 1996, MINUTES:
MOTION: Haigh moved to approve the minutes of the September 11, 1996, meeting of the
Board of Adjustment, as printed. Brandt seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 3-0.
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONNARIANCE ITEMS:
EXC96-0016. Public hearing on an application submitted by Jeff Schabilion for a
special exception 'to .modify the side yard requirements for property located m the
Medium Density Single-Family Residential (RS-8) zone at 431 Rundell Street.
Eckhardt announced that the applicant has requested a deferral of this item.
MOTION: Brantit moved and Haigh seconded the motion to defer EXC96-0016 to the
November 13, 1996, meeting of the Board of Adjustment. The motion carried on a
vote of 3-0.
(Lehman arrived at 4:38 p.m.)
EXC96-OO22/VAR96-0002. Public hearing on an application submitted by Shirley
Young for a special exception to modify the front yard requirement along Dartmouth
Street and a variance to modify the vision triangle requirement at the Washing-
ton/Dartmouth intersection for property located in the Low Density S~ngle-Family
Residential (RS-5) zone at 3041 Washington Street.
Rockwell said both a special exception and a variance would be required for approval
of this item. Rockwell said since the special exception portions of this request were
covered extensively at the September 11, 1996, meeting, she would concentrate on
the variance portion of the request. Rockwell noted, however, that staff feels a ws~on
problem exists with the southeast corner of the fence, which requires a special excep-
tion to remain in place. Rockwell pointed out that the land in this area slopes toward
the south; an accident could occur should a child be riding a b~cycle or running home
from nearby Lemme Elementary School, and someone ~s backing out of the drive
without adequate sight lines. Rockwell said to widen the vision tnangle makes sense.
Rockwell said the staff also continues to recommend that the vision triangle require-
Iowa C~ty Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 2
ments for the northeast corner of fence, the area for which a variance ~s requested,
should be met as well.
Rockwell said the purpose of the vision triangle is to provide adequate lines of sight
for vehicles approaching intersections. In this case, the intersection at Washington
Street and Dartmouth Street is controlled with four-way stop signs and Washington
Street has a wider than average, 60-foot right-of-way. This controlled intersection and
extra wide right-of-way lessen the impact of a variance to allow five feet of a s~x-foot
high fence to encroach into the required vision triangle. It appears that the proposed
variance would not contravene the intent of ensuring safety/adequate visibility at the
intersection. Rockwell said, therefore, the public interest test for granting a variance
is met.
Rockwell said the Board must also determine whether the literal enforcement of the
Zoning Chapter will result in unnecessary hardship. The Board must be satisfied in
hearing the evidence of the case that granting the variance will alleviate a clearly
demonstrable hardship that approaches confiscation. Rockwell said altering the fence
to remove it from the vision triangle will decrease the area enclosed by the fence by
12.5 feet, which will not significantly affect the value of the property. The property
owner will still be able to maintain the residential use of the property and there will still
be a privacy area. The fence can be brought into compliance with Code with only
minimal diminishment of value in the property.
Rockwell said.the Board must also consider whether the property is unique or peculiar.
Rockwell noted there are some peculiarities of the property, but as the Board had
witnessed in viewing the site, there are other, similar fence situations in the area. By
granting a variance in this case, the Board would be conferring a special favor to the
applicant over others who must comply in similar circumstances.
Rockwell said the Board must also consider whether the hardship is of the owners own
making. Although the applicant did not knowingly construct the fence in the vision
triangle, she is responsible, as the property owner, for constructing the fence and for
its location. The requested variance does not meet the three tests of hardship. and as
such, should not be approved bythe Board. Although the public interest test has been
met in this situation, all tests must be satisfied in order for the Board to grant the
variance.
Rockwell said this is not the only situation that has arisen in recant weeks that in-
volves fences or hedges located in the sight triangle. There may be a need to amend
the ordinance so there is a better, fairer way of looking at these situations as they
arise. Rockwell said many of these situations here been outlined by John Yapp ~n the
staff report, including whether there is extra w~de right-of-way, a controlled inter-
section or a reduced speed limit. These factors do make a difference ~n ws~bdity at
intersections.
While staff cannot recommend granting a variance to the ordinance, Rockwell sa~d it
does recommend that the Board ask the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider
amending the vision triangle section of the Zoning Chapter to account for ddferences
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 3
in right-of-way width, speed limits, controlled versus uncontrolled intersecuons, and
other intersection variables. The Board may also want to request that the Commission
consider requiring permits for fences sothat people putting up a fence will know at the
time they apply for the permit whether the fence would be in the correct location or
not,
Rockwell said staff recommends that VAR96-0002, a variance to modify the vision
triangle requirement at the Washington Street/Dartmouth Street intersection be denied,
but that the Board of Adjustment request that the Planning and Zoning Commission
consider directing staff to study the vision triangle requirement to take into account
differences in right-of-way width, controlled versus uncontrolled intersections, speed
limits, and other inters6ction variables, and consider a permit process for the installa-
tion of fences. Staff also recommends that EXC96-0022, a special exception to
reduce the front yard requirement from 20 feet to one foot along the 45-foot width of
the fence at 3041 Washington Street, and to allow the fence to begin within one foot
of the Dartmouth Street right-of-way line be approved, subject to; 1) the corner of the
fence within the required intersection vision triangle complying with the vision triangle
requirements within six months of the time the City completes the review of the vision
triangle requirement, and City staff notifies the applicant of the results of the review,
and 2) the southeast corner of the fence being altered so the southern edge of the
fence is set back a minimum of 10 feet from the sidewalk to form a 45-degree angle
to the Dartmouth Street right-of-way line.
Rockwell said the Board has received a copy of a letter from Nancy Dooley in favor of
allowing the fence to remain as it stands.
Public hearing:
Shirley Youno, 3041 Washinqton Street, the applicant, reminded the Board that she
had contacted the Department of Housing and Inspectfon Services and was told by an
individual that no permits were needed for the fence. She said there was no mention
of other restrictions. Young said she had spent a lot of time, labor and money over a
two year period constructing the fence, and all along she was under the impression
that she was doing things correctly. Young said she does not feel in error in construct-
ing the fence as it stands and feels no obstruction of vision has resulted. Young
reminded the Board that she had taken such things as vision and safety into consider-
ation when constructing the fence, although she was not aware of such th~ngs as
setbacks and vision triangle requirements at that time.
Nancy Dooley. 120 Dartmouth Street, who lives across the street to the east and two
houses south from the intersection, thanked staff and the Board for its measured and
pleasant rebuttal of the items that she had misunderstood. However, Dooley w~shed
to stress that she would have a problem if the City were to act only when there is a
complaint, as appears to be the situation in this case. Yet, when they do act, they
follow stringent Code requirements. Dooley said the process is flawed should thin be
the case.
Public hearing closed.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 4
MOTION: Haigh moved and Lehman seconded the motion to approve VAR96-0002,
a variance to modify the vision triangle requirement at the Washington
Street/Dartmouth Street intersection for property located in the RS-5 zone at 3041
Washington Street.
Brandt said the Board has had time since the last meeting to review the differences
between exceptions and variances. He thanked staff for making this distinction more
clear. Regarding the vision triangle. Brandt said the intent of the ordinance appears to
be met. He said he has viewed the site on several occasions now and. in his m~nd,
cannot see a problem with the way the fence currently stands. On the other hand,
Brandt said it is significant to grant a change in the ordinance when the Board has not
been provided the evidence to make such a change. Brandt said it is unfortunate that
communication appeared to be lacking in this case, but said the evidence does not
exist to set a precedent by approving the variance.
Lehman said he had noticed that a number of hedges appear to be getting cut back at
intersections around town. He asked staff whether the City had stepped up its
enforcement as a result of recent Board items. Rockwell said a brochure was enclosed
with recent water bills that noted standards for hedge and fence heights in the vision
triangle, and a number of complaints have been logged as a result of th~s. Rockwell
said the Department of Housing and Inspection Services currently has a backlog of
such cases to review.
Haigh agreed with Brandt that the standards have not been adequately met to consider
granting the variance.
Eckhardt said she agrees that this case does not meet the standards for granting a
variance and said the ~vhoie idea of zoning is to benefit the public. Eckhardt said she
sympathizes with Young in that she was misled to believe she was meeting all that
was required of her, but as ignorance of the law is no excuse, she could not vote in
favor of granting the variance.
The motion failed on a vote of 0-4.
MOTION: Lehman moved and Brandt seconded the motion to request that the Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission consider directing staff to study the vision triangle
requirement to take into account differences in right-of-way width, controlled versus
uncontrolled intersections, speed limits, and other intersection variables.
Brandt said staff had brought up the issue of whether to consider a permit process for
fence construction. Brandt said he is not sure whether a permit process is necessary,
but did note it may reduce miscommunication and fences being constructed ~n the
wrong locations. The Board concluded that a review of the wsion triangle require-
ments will determine whether a permit process for fence construction will be neces-
sary or valuable.
The motion carried on a vote of 4-0.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9. 1996
Page 5
MOTION: Haigh moved and Brandt seconded the motion to approve EXC96-0022, a
special exception to reduce the front yard requirement from 20 feet to one foot along
the 45 foot width of the fence at 3041 Washington Street, and to allow the fence to
begin within one foot of the Dartmouth Street right-of-way line, subject to: 1) the
corner of the fence within the required intersection vision triangle complying to the
vision triangle requirement within six months of the time the City completes the review
of the vision triangle requirement, and City staff notifies the applicant of the results
of the review, and 2) the southeast corner of the fence being altered so the southern
edge of the fence is set back a minimum of 10 feet from the sidewalk to form a 45
degree angle to the Dartmouth Street right-of-way line.
Brandt said he is agreeable to requiring the alteration of the southeast corner of the
fence, because he does feel inadequate sight distance is currently provided for safe
maneuvering. Eckhardt clarified whether the motion, as stated, would mean that
condition number two would need to be met right away, yet condition number one
regarding the northeast corner can wait until the vision triangle has been reviewed.
Rockwell said this is correct.
The Board felt it had adequately expressed its views concerning the special exception
at the previous meeting.
The motion carried on a vote of 4-0.
EXC96-0024'~ Discussion of an application submitted by Clarissa T. Watt for a special
exception to modify the front yard requirement along Muscatine Avenue for property
located in the RS-8 zone at 1603 Muscatine Avenue.
Rockwell said Watt is requesting a special exception to permit her to complete con-
struction of a covered porch at the main entrance to her antique shop. Atwenty foot
setback is required between street rights-of-way and structures, including covered
porches, in the RS-8 zone. The Board may grant a special exception to modify yard
requirements when the owner or lawful occupant of the property demonstrates that
the situation is peculiar to the property in question, there is practical difficulty m
complying with the dimensional requirements of the Zoning Chapter, and the general
standards for granting special exceptions will be met.
Rockwell said the peculiarity of the property involves the constructran of the budding
at a time when setback requirements were not required. This resulted in the structure
being placed on the lot closer to the Muscatine Avenue right-of-way than would now
be permitted. It is also likely that the Muscatine Avenue right-of-way has widened
over the years as the street has carried more and more traffic.
Rockwell said the practical difficulties in meeting the dimensional requirements should
also be considered. The requested front yard reduction is not substantial either in
quantitative or qualitative terms. The covered porch extends only four feet from the
existing structure toward Muscatine Avenue and covers existing concrete entry steps.
It involves an encroachment of eighty square feet, which decreases the front yard by
2.5%.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 6
Rockwell said no substantial change or detriment to the neighborhood would result
from the exception. The covered porch simply makes the entryway safer and more
accessible, attractive and compatible in appearance with neighboring resident,al
structures. Even if the applicant were to reconstruct the porch to be an uncovered
porch only three feet wide, a front yard modification would be required. If th~s were
the case, there would be no roof to deter ice formation or to mask a flat area on the
front of the structure previously used for grocery store signage.
Rockwell said the requested encroachment into the required front yard along Muscatine
Avenue does not compromise the safety of pedestrians and vehicles at the intersection
of Dearborn Street and Muscatine Avenue. The porch is of open construction and is
set well back from the vision triangle at that intersection, To ensure continued visibili-
ty and to prevent increased floor area being added to a non-conforming use, staff
recommends that the special exception be subject to the understanding that the porch
is not to be enclosed in the future.
Rockwell said staff also recommends that vehicular access to the parking area be
limited to the drive off Dearborn; that the applicant install curb stops in a continuous
line two feet back from and parallel to the Muscatine Avenue right-of-way line.
Rockwell said planters that are a maximum of two feet in height could be used instead
of curb stops and would be more attractive and visible and still serve the same pur-
pose, Rockwell said the point would be to close off the Muscatine Avenue curb cut
in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan policy that encourages restricted access
to arterial streets. It should also create a safer situation for people using the porch
ramp, Rockwell said she had spoken briefly with Mrs, Watt before the meeting. Mrs.
Watt had indicated that she may place the ramp on the other side of the porch.
Rockwell said staff recommends that EXC96-0024, a special exception to reduce the
required front yard along the Muscatine Avenue right-of-way from 20 feet to 2.5-6 feet
to accommodate a four-foot by twenty-foot covered porch on the northeast side of the
existing structure for property located in the RS-8 zone at 1603 Muscatme Avenue be
approved, subject to the property owner 1) understanding that the porch shall not be
enclosed now or in the future, and 2) installing and maintaining curb stops or planters
in a continuous line two feet back from and parallel to the Muscatine Avenue r~ght-of-
way line, and extending northeast for a minimum of 40 feet from a point oppos,te the
south edge of the existing Muscatine Avenue curbcut.
Rockwell pointed out that she had received no telephone calls on this ~tem, but had
received a number of letters expressing support for the special except[on.
Public hearing:
Joe Holland, 123 North Linn Street, attorney for Cris Watt, read a letter from Joan
Frantz, an east side resident, which the Board had not yet received. This reads. "in
my mind, the covered entry that Mrs. Watt would add to the building would serve as
an embellishment to the whole neighborhood, in essence to the whole c~ty. It ~s
refreshing to see private bus~ness people who initiate improvements to their property
and they should be encouraged. They are the lifeblood of our community. I'm sure
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 7
the taxpayers of Iowa City are pleased to know that there are still people who are
willing to improve their surroundings for all without asking for financial aid. How very
unique in this day and age, and I for one appreciate it."
Holland said hopefully the Board has thoroughly reviewed the staff report and read all
the letters attached to the staff report. He said if the Board has had a chance to view
the property, they would understand what the porch has added to the property.
Holland said it is unfortunate that the contractor did not realize a special exception was
needed prior to its construction, but said, on the other hand, the Board must often
consider things in the abstract, and in this case, the Board can actually see what it
would be approving.
Regarding the conditions staff has placed on approval of the exception, Holland said
Mrs. Watt has no objection to the condition that the porch must never be enclosed as
she has no intention to do any more. Holland said they do not, however, agree with
the condition for curb stops. Holland said he has discussed the matter at length with
his client and she feels these would hamper her business. Holland reminded the Board
that this is a business and it is going to fail if customers do not have readily available
access to parking. Holland also reminded the Board that his client and her husband
had operated a food market on the site for over fifty years and because of this, she
knows the are¢; she knows what she has to do to make the business succeed at this
location. In Mrs. Watt's estimation, many people will not make the effort to turn onto
Dearborn Street and then pull into the drive. He said putting in anything that restricts
access is putting in something that jeopardizes business.
Holland said in regard to pedestrian and auto conflict, Mrs. Watt had told him that
there has never been a pedestrian-auto accident at that site. Because of this, Holland
said he does not know that staff can say that there is a legitimate problem there that
needs to be addressed. Holland said the installation of curb cuts and/or planters will
cause more problems than they will solve. Holland noted that anything installed will
act as a barrier to snow removal. Holland said planters may act as a barrier to pedes-
trians and may pose a threat to public safety, especially at night. These may also act
as a =barrier to the loading or unloading of merchandise, which is transported through
the front door, and access to the front door may be more difficult to obtain.
Holland asked that the Board approve the special exception, but drop the condition
about curb stops. Holland said the curb stop condition would decrease the utility of
the property. He said he feels the Board should be in a position of encouraging small
business, especially someone who has operated respectable businesses on the s~te for
over fifty years, and should not impose conditions which may affect the viability of
operating a business on the site.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 8
Cris T. Watt, 1603 Muscatine Avenue, said she has lived in the neighborhood for over
seventy years and because of this she is very familiar with the neighborhood and its
activities. When she and her husband began the food market in 1946, Muscatine
Avenue was Highway 6 and the store was very active, because, although there were
37 small grocery stores, there was only one supermarket. They operated from 7 a.m.
to 10:30 p.m, She said she now operates her antique store from 10:00 a.m. to 4
p.m., which pretty much eliminates being open at times of busy traffic. Watt said to
her knowledge, there has never been an incident of personal injury as a result of
pedestrian-automobile conflicts at the site. Watt noted that several years ago a
gentleman from Missouri had inquired about purchasing the site and the adjoining
property in order to put in a min,-mart. Watt said she and her husband declined the
generous offer, because they could not do that tothe neighborhood, and she still feels
the same way.
Watt said there are a large number of pedestrians, walkers and joggers in this neigh-
borhood. She feels that curb stops or planters would act as adetriment to pedestrians.
Watts brought up the issue of liability and asked whose responsibility this would be
should something happen. Watts asked whether similar conditions would also be
imposed upon theTrca Law Firm or Seatons Grocery, which are located just down the
street and have similar parking situations, or upon the knit shop, the two gas stations,
Osco's Drug, or the University Credit Union, etc. Watts said she strongly feels that
closing the Muscatine Avenue access would be a big detriment to her business and
said she is real happy with the way things currently stand.
Public hearing closed.
Eckhardt asked why the building of a porch on a property. which is grandfathered ~nto
the Code, would cause the need for curb stops. Rockwell said the mare reason for this
condition is to limit access onto an arterial street. Rockwell pointed out. however, that
limited space exists on the site to turn a car around, so it may be more practical to
allow the drive through. She said staff would not object to dropping this condition.
MOTION: Haigh moved and Lehman seconded the motion to approve EXC96-0024,
a special exception to reduce the required front yard along the Muscatine Avenue right-
of-way from 20 feet to 2.5-6 feet to accommodate a four-foot by twenty-foot covered
porch on the northeast side of the existing structure for property located in the RS-8
zone at 1603 Muscatine Avenue, subject to the property owner understanding that the
covered porch shall not be enclosed now or in the future.
Brandt said he actually prefers to access the site from Dearborn Street, because the
Muscatine Avenue access does approach close to the front door. Brandt said although
he has not accessed the site when Muscatine Avenue has been particularly busy, he
can appreciate what the City is attempting to accomplish. Brandt said the porch does
not appear to have made much of an ,ntrusion into the front yard requirements than
had previously existed, and may actually be an improvement from a safety standpoint.
Brandt also feels property values are in no way hindered by the addition of the porch,
so he will vote in favor of the motion.
Iowa C~ty Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 9
Haigh said when you are considering the hours of operation of 10 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
these are not particularly busy hours on Muscatine Avenue. He said he did not feel the
curb cut on Muscatine Avenue is going to make a great deal of difference, therefore,
he is in favor of dropping the second condition. Haigh said it appears as a result of all
of the letters in favor that have been received, and from his own viewing of the
property, that the property has been greatly improved aesthetically. He did not see
any reason'not to approve the exception.
Lehman said he appreciates the comments made by the applicant and her legal advisor.
Lehman said he has occasion to frequent Seatoh'S Grocery and noted that this is a
very similar and convenient parking situation with the ability to drive in one side and
out the other. Lehman said he feels it would be in the best interest of all to drop the
condition for closing the curb cut. Lehman said he does not imagine that the antique
furniture shop will be real busy and he does not envision this causing any backups in
traffic. Lehman said he also does not envision people driving by and deciding rather
quickly that they need to stop and pick something up, as they might for a grocery
store/mini-mart situation. Rather, most will be making a trip solely to go to the store
and will likely drive in the Dearborn Street side and out the Muscatine Avenue side.
Eckhardt agreed with her colleagues regarding the lack of necessity for the second
condition, as well as their stance on other issues,
The motion carried on a vote of 4-0.
EXC96-0025. Discussion of an application submitted by Douglas J. Paul for a special
exception to modify the front yard requirement along Highway 6 for property located
in the Intensive Commercial (C1-1) zone at 507 Highland Avenue.
Rockwell said the applicant would like to add a 32-foot by 60-foot warehouse addmort
at the rear of his commercial property. The business, Profiles Corporation, faces north
toward Highland Avenue and the rear of the property fronts on Highway 6. A twenty
foot setback is required between street rights-of-way and buildings in the C1-1. Inten-
sive Commercial zone. If built as proposed, the southwest corner of the add~bon
would encroach into the required front yard along Highway 6.
Rockwell said the Board may grant a special exception to modify the front yard require-
ment, but must consider whether the property is peculiar in soma way, there ~s practi-
cal difficulty, and it meets the general standards for granting a special exception. In
this case, the peculiarity of the situation involves the double frontage of the lot, the
d~agonal right-of-way line along Highway 6 that angles from the southeast to the
northwest, and the extra wide highway right-of-way.
According to the applicant, the distance from the nearest point of the addition to the
Highway 6 pavement would be 125 feet. The requested front yard reductmn ~s not
substantial e~ther in qualitative or quantitative terms. Because of the way the budding
would line up with the building on the adjacent property to the east, and due to the
distance the addition would be from Highway 6, the building would not have the
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9. 1996
Page 10
appearance of encroachment. Only the southwest corner of the addition would extend
into the required front yard along Highway 6, and the area of encroachment would be
approximately 301 square feet or 10% of the total required front yard for this proper-
ty.
Rockwell said although the warehouse addition will not increase the population density,
it may add a small increment of truck traffic on the surrounding public streets. The
portion of the building that would encroach into the required front yard along Highway
6 is some distance from adjacent properties; 22 feet from the nearest point of en-
croachment to the east property line and over 70 feet from the nearest point of
encroachment to the west property line. The wide highway right-of-way separates it
from the commercial properties to the south. Because the addition would be located
on the south side of the property, the encroachment will not be noticeable from proper-
ties located north of the site. However, staff does recommend that evergreen land-
scaping be provided between the new addition and the south property line to soften
the appearance of the building as viewed from the highway, an entryway into the city.
The applicant has agreed to provide evergreen trees along the south side and evergreen
shrubbery along the east side of the new addition.
Rockwell said the applicant could build a smaller addition that widens to 32 feet at a
point where no encroachment into the front yard setback along Highway 6 would
occur. This would create additional warehouse space without requiring a front yard
reduction. The requested exception to reduce the front yard requirement would not
be substantial either in appearance, quantitative terms or impact on neighboring
property owners. Buffering the addition with evergreen landscaping will soften the
appearance of the warehouse along a major entryway into the city and make it more
compatible with the restaurant business on the property to the east. Rockwell said the
warehouse will add value to the 507 Highland Avenue property whmh ~s located in an
intensive commercial zone.
Rockwell said staff recommends that EXC96-0025, a special exception to reduce the
front yard setback area along the Highway 6 right-of-way from 20 feet to 6-20 feet
along the angle of the west portion of the south wall of the 32-foot by 60-foot addition
for property located in the C1-1 zone at 507 Highland Avenue be approved, subject to
the applicant planting and maintaining evergreen landscaping along the south and east
side of the new addition; that is, planting and maintaining evergreen trees between the
new addition and the Highway 6 right-of-way line to the south in accordance with the
vegetative screening requirements set forth in City Code subsection 14-6S-11, and
evergreen shrubs set at a minimum of four feet on center on the east s~de of the
addition,
Rockwell said she had received a telephone call from Dean Thornberry, owner of the
property to the east, who pointed out that the Burger King dining windows look out
on the area where the extension is proposed to occur; that his dining patrons would
be looking out at a blank wall. Thornberry said he was totally, 100,000% opposed to
the special exception and stated that he would try to attend the Board meeting, but
if he is unable to do so, he wanted the Board to know that he is a neighboring property
owner, he is the most impacted neighbor, and he is opposed. Rockwell clarified for
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 13,
the Board the triangle of encroachment that is involved. The wall along the property
line could be built and still comply with the setback requirements; that portion of the
structure would not encroach into the front yard.
Eckhardt said she believes this portion of Highway 6 was planted by Project GREEN
· and staff would probably want to work with them to make sure that their objectives
are not being hindered. She asked whether there would be some way to reduce the
amount of wordiness regarding the evergreen condition. Rockwell said there are trees
in the right-of-way, but the evergreens would be placed on private property along the
wail of the.building and would provide a softening screen. She said specificity is
needed so there is a clear understanding by the applicant and City enforcement person-
nel of what is required when the landscaping is installed. Eckhardt said it does not
really specify that the evergreens are to be planted along the building. Rockwell said
the condition requires the evergreens to be planted between the right-of-way line and
the building. This will effectively locate the evergreens near the wall in a way that
screens th~ building.
Public hearing:
Doualas J. Paul, 507 Hiclhland Avenue, pointed out on the overhead projector the
location of the Burger King restaurant in relation to his property, Paul emphasized that
the rear of the proposed addition would end up about as far south as the Burger King
drive-through window. Paul said Profiles publishes materials for school districts and
they warehouse what they have sent out for print. Paul said, basically, the volume of
business has outgrown the current facilities. Paul said should they print smaller
volumesi their printing costs would increase significantly. They are currently paying
for off-site storage.
Paul said he appreciates staff's report, but said the report is sort of ironic in that truck
traffic to the warehouse would actually be reduced, not increased. Although they may
have 15,000 copies of an item printed, they can only bring 5,000 copies at a time to
the warehouse for storage, whereas with the additional space, only one trip would be
required. Therefore, the incoming and outgoing truck traffic would be reduced.
Regarding Thornharry's stance concerning the view, Paul said those diners who go to
Burger King for the view would be seeing a continuation of the building rather than the
parking lot they.currently see. Paul does not feel this would impact the amount of
Burger King business in any way. Paul said that he could construct thin side of the
building without requiring an exception. Paul said the 32-foot width ~s required in
Iowa C~ty Board of Adlustment
October 9. 1996
Page 12
older for a fork lift to maneuver and they must have a rectangular shape or the space
is not useful for pallet storage. Paul said the corner of the building, which encroaches
into the front yard setback area, only encroaches about 6-8 feet. He said his business
has outgrown its current space, about two-thirds of which is office space.
Dan Tiedt, 415 Hic~hland Avenue, owner of PIP Printing, sa~d he does not do the
printing for Profiles, so he has no business interest, but said the city should be in the
business of encouraging additions as they benefit the local economy. Tiedt noted that
as Paul had stated, he may have to look for space in another community should this
exception not be granted. Tiedt said he feels the addition would be of benefit to the
area and is confident that Paul will have things done in a tasteful manner.
Public hearing closed.
MOTION: Lehman moved and Haigh seconded the motion to approve EXC96-0025,
a special exception to reduce the front yard setback area along the Highway 6 right-of-
way from 20 feet to 6-20 feet along the angle of the west portion of the south wall
of the 32-foot by 60*foot addition for property located in the C1-1 zone at 507 High-
land Avenue, subject to the applicant planting and maintaining evergreen landscaping
along the south and east side of the new addition; that is, planting and maintaining
evergreen trees between the new addition and the Highway 6 right-of-way line to the
south in accordance with the vegetative screening requirements set forth in City Code
subsection 14-6S-1~1, and evergreen shrubs set at a minimum of four feet on center
on the east side of the addition.
Lehman said this is a similar situation to the Economy Advertising request in which
only a corner of the building was affecting the situation. Lehman said he does not feel
Burger King really has an issue, because Paul would only have to cut back the corner
of the addition, the far corner from the restaurant, and no exception would be required.
Lehman said he does not see any great impact in approving encroachment of only a
small portion of the addition, He said he will vote to approve the exception.
Brandt said the property is somewhat urnqua in that it has a street at the front and the
back and the angle of one of the streets affects the property. The overall ~mpact on
the surrounding properties, at least for the encroaching corner that the Board ~s con-
cerned about, is somewhat limited. He said he will vote in favor of the motion.
Haigh agreed with the uniqueness factor and felt confident that the surrounding
properties will not be negatively impacted. Ha~gh also appreciated that Paul was
going through all the trouble to attempt to expand his business and remain ~n Iowa
City.
Eckhardt agreed with her colleagues. She said the exception ~s minimal. She did not
envision any problems resulting from the encroachment.
The motion carried on a vote of 4-0.
Iowa City Board of Adjustment
October 9, 1996
Page 13
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT INFORMATION:
Variance Tests. Rockwell thanked the Board for its careful review of the variance item
and its understanding that a variance requires a more stringent review process than a
special exception. Rockwell said, in retrospect, perhaps a variance should not have
been encouraged as an option. But she noted it was good that some questions were
raised concerning the ordinance and different situations that may arise concerning
fences at intersections. As a rule, however, a variance should not be encouraged,
unless compliance with the ordinance would mean that the use could not continue or
it would result in a confiscation of the property. Brandt commended the Board and
staff as well.
Meeting Time/Public Access. Rockwell said over the past ten years, she has heard
from a number of people who would either like to attend a Board meeting, or may like
to serve on the Board, but are unable to attend at the established meeting time of 4:30
p.m. Rockwell asked the Board to consider whether they would like to schedule a
different meeting time. Eckhardt did not feel there was a pressing need to change the
meeting time. Brandt said the meeting time as it is now works well for him, but he felt
the Board should be mindful of being accessible. Rockwell said this item can be placed
on the November agenda.
Lehman'sTetro Endinc~. Rockwell announced that Lehman's term will be ending at the
end of December. Rockwell said the Board generally has a farewell luncheon for
departing members, which she can schedule in December.
OTHER BUSINESS:
There was
ADJOURNMENT:
Lehman moved and Haigh seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:02 p.m. The
motion carried on a vote of 4-0.
Patricia Eckhardt, Chairperson
Melody Rockwell, Board Secretary
Minutes submitted by Jeff Haring.
IOWA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMEIV'T MEETING
WI:DNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1996- 4.'30 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SIGN IN SHEET
Name Address
Z
o
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
17.
18.
19.
COUNCIL
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1996 - 7:30 PM
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRELIMINARY
Subject to Approval
MEMBERSPRESENT:
Ann Bovbjerg, Benjamin Chait, Dick Gibson, Jane Jakobsen, Tom
Scott, Lea Supple
MEMBERS ABSENT:
George Starr
STAFF PRESENT:
Bob Miklo, Sarah Holecek, Anne Schulte
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
Recommended approval, by a vote of 6-0, that the City Council forward a letter to the
Johnson County Board of Supervisors recommending approval of CZ-9641, an application
to fezone approximately 22 acres located on the north side of Highway 1, approximately
one mile west of Sharon Center Road (W62) from A1, Agricultural, to RS-5 Suburban
Residential, with the stipulation that there should only be one access road to Highway 1.
Recommended approval, by a vote of 5-0-1, tl~at the City Council forward a letter to the
Johnson County Board of Supervisors recommending approval of CZ-9647, an application
to mzone approximately 8.64 acres located west of Prairie du Chien Road, approximately
1/4 mile north of Newport Road from A1, Agricultural, to RS-3, Suburban Residential.
Recommbnded denial, by a vote of 6-0, SUB96-0020, a preliminary plat of Scott-Six
Industrial Park, a 140.5 acre, 41-1ot industrial/commercial subdivision located in Johnson
County on the east side of Scott Boulevard, north of Highway 6. The Commission
recommend denial of the application for the following rsasons: 1) subdivision design
issues including: a) improper lot configuration, i.e., the subdivision ordinance prohibits the
use of double frontage lots unless good platting indicates their use, b) inappropriate
design of 420th Street, and c) the lack of IDNR approval for Snyder Creek relocation; 2)
lack of compliance with City design standards: a) lack of storm water management provi-
sions, b) lack of sidewalks, c) lack of fire hydrants as required by City standards, and d)
inadequate provisions regarding the waste water disposal and water supply systems; and
3) the Commission recommends to the City Council that no change be made in the City
policy regarding connections to municipal water and sewer systems by any property that
remains in the unincorporated area of the County.
Recommended approval, by a vote of 6-0, of SUB96-0023, a preliminary plat ot A
Resubdivision of Lot 2, Westport Plaza, an 11.41 acre, 2-1or commercial subdivision
located south of Ruppert Road.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Bovbjerg called the meeting to order at 7:37 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF VACANCIES ON CITY BOARD AND COMMISSIONS:
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 2
There was none.
REZONING ITEMS:
REZ96-0019. Public discussion of an application submitted by Ed and Cheryl Sobask~ to
rezone approximately .76 acres located at the southwest comer of Waterfront Drive and
Southgate Avenue from C1-1, Intensive Commercial, to CC-2, Community Commercial.
(45-day limitation period: November 14, 1996)
Miklo showed the property location on a map of the area. Miklo said the applicant would
like to construct an office building with a daycare center on the site. Miklo said a daycare
center can be allowed by special exception in the CC-2 zone, but is not allowed in the CI-
I zone. Miklo said the South District Plan proposes that the area west of the property be
rezoned to CC-2. The rezoning may extend to the east to include this property, but at this
time the requested rezoning would result in spot zoning. He said that the eastern border
of the area to be rezoned is in question. Miklo said the railroad is the most logical eastern
border. He noted the area east of the railroad has C1-1 businesses and two group homes
that would become nonconforming if a larger area east of the railroad were rezoned.
Miklo stated that staff recommends deferral until either the South District Plan is adopted
or the applicants receive enough support from surrounding property owners to have a
larger area rezoned so that a one-lot "spot zone" is not created.
Public discussion:
Ed Sobaski, 2315 Cameron Way, showed a diagram of a lift station called a "sewage
ejector.' He said he had spoken to George Kondora of Kondora Plumbing about eventual-
ly routing under Waterlront Drive to Southgate Avenue to a manhole to hook up to C~ty
sewer services when they become available. Sobaski said he is willing to bear that
expense; that it is a relatively minor issue in terms of the cost. He will be ready to hook
up to the sewer when it comes through.
Sobaski said that he contacted as many property owners in the area as possible. He
talked to Glenn Siders and Harry Wolf of Southgate Development, who were not opposed
to the property being zoned CC-2, but did not want to see it spot zoned. Sobaski sa~d he
also talked to Mike McNiel and Bill Kron, who own Mike McNiel Repair and Bill's Autos.
Sobaski said they were not opposed to him rezoning only his property to CC-2, but they
do not want their businesses to end up as nonconforming. He said the question ~s still up
in the air as to whether they would be comfortable having their businesses permitted only
by Special exception under CC-2 zoning. Their businesses are allowed in the current C1-1
zone, but would require a special exception in the CC-2 zone.
Sobaski stated he also talked to Art Scott of MECCA, who told him that having HACAP
there would be great. However, he said Scott would be opposed to the MECCA property
being rezoned to CC-2, which would make MECCA nonconforming. MECCA would not be
permitted even by special exception in a CC-2 zone. Sobaski also talked to Pat Kennedy,
son of Tom Kennedy, who owns some of the property on the west side of the railroad
tracks. He said the Kennedys are not opposed to CC-2 zoning or to the Sobaski property
being zoned CC-2.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 3
Sobaski said he was not able to contact anyone from the Youth Homes property, but he
assumes they would have some of the same problems with becoming nonconforming
under CC-2 zoning. Sobaski showed sketches of the area from the Beyond 2000 [South
District] Plan that recommends changing the zoning in this area to CC-2. He said he was
not receiving any opposition from that area; the land seems to be all vacant in the area
shown. He said he would just like his property included in the CC-2 zone on the south
side of the proposed Southgate Avenue.
Sobaski said another option would be to connect his property to the Hy-Vee CC-2 zone
by bringing CC-2 zoning down on the west side of Waterfront Drive. which would include
Mike McNiel's and Bill Kron's properties. In that case, the question of their businesses
becoming nonconforming would need to be addressed.
Supple asked about the timing of the building project. Sobaski said he would like to start
as soon as possible because of weather and time constraints, but needed to complete
construction by July I to meet commitments to HACAP and to allow HACAP to meet its
own commitments.
Scott asked Miklo about the status of the McNiel and Kron businesses in a CC-2 zone.
Miklo said they could continue to operate as nonconforming uses. He stated that if they
wanted to expand, they would require a special exception for an auto and truck oriented
use, which would be permissible provided the Board of Adjustment grants it. He noted
the Board often puts conditions on special exceptions. Scott asked Sobaski if the Kron
property is developed and Sobaski confirmed that it is.
Sobaski added that after reading the Beyond 2000 [South District] Plan, he feels the
HACAP facility is much needed in that area, because of the expected residenbal develop-
ment. He stated that HACAP serves a lot of needs in the area and that the location is
ideally situated for them. He also said he is planning to construct an appealing-looking
building that people coming into town will see.
AI Axeen, Coralville, stated that he is the assistant director of HACAP and the d~rector of
HACAP in Johnson County, He showed a map that was used to work with developers to
come up with ideas for the building. The map shows demographics of people receiving
heating assistance, a service HACAP provides, and how many of those people have
Headstart or pre-Headstart aged children. He indicated from the circles that the HACAP
service area is in this general vicinity. Axeen said there is now a family service center,
which is what this building will be, in Coralville, which houses the same things they wish
to do in Iowa City. When he put the demographic information out to developers, there
were two responses. The other site was along Stevens Drive, which would have met with
the same zoning concerns.
Axeen displayed another map showing the location of 1995 Headstart children. He stated
that projections on the service needs of the community indicated that daycare would be
a critical issue. Axeen described the services, including daycare, provided by HACAP.
Axeen stated the service center in Coralville had the same problems with zoning since
there is a daycare, but there are other functions, such as offices that require commercial
zoning. He said HACAP had to be on the edge of a commercial zone with a special
exception to fit in that scenario.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 4
Axeen said he wants to give support to Sobaski's request that Waterfront Drive be the
dividing line for the new CC-2 zoned area. He remarked that if the building is not allowed,
then he will have to go back to Io0k for properties and developers willing to make the
investment so that HACAP could then lease back the building.
Bill Kron, 2839 Sterling Ddve, said he has lived in and been a small business owner m
Iowa City since 1971. He stated that he owns and operates Hawkeye Country Auto Sales
at 1947 Waterfront Drive and also Mr. Bill's Auto Parts. He said he welcomes and would
have no opposition to Sobaski's new business or application for rezoning his parcel of
land. However, he would like only the Sobaski property to be spot zoned to meet his
needs. Kron would like his property to remain zoned intensive commercial, because he
has a highly successful and marketable business there. He said he has been there ten
years.
Scott told Kron if the only way to prevent spot zoning is to take the second proposal
shown on the map by Sobaski (the s!iver from the proposed applicant's property north to
the Hy-Vee area that is zoned CC-2), he could continue to operate as a nonconforming
use. Miklo said any increase in square footage of the building would require a special
exception from the Board of Adjustment. Kron asked if he wished to sell his business 5
or 10 years from today, would he be able to market and sell it as a used car business.
Scott said yes, it would remain a legally, nonconforming use. Kron said he is not totally
negative toward the idea, but not totally agreeable either.
Gibson asked why this site was selected if the neighbors are not totally enthused about
the idea_ Axeen answered that he liked the site and the area. He stated that Sobsski
believed that he would be conforming when the new plan was eventually adopted. He sa~d
his contract with Sobaski states that as long as the area can be rezoned, then he will
construct the building. Axeart said the other possibility for the building would also have
required rezoning, and also had the same stipulation about proper zoning.
Miklo said the South Distdct Plan makes it clear that everything west of the railroad tracks
should be considered for rezoning to CC-2. The area in question is on a border, and
although the staff would consider it, they had cautioned the applicant that it was not a
clear-cut case and would not necessarily be zoned quickly. Gibson said that the property
is not only on the border, but is also across a'railroad, a fairly significant barrier.
Sobaski said that the railroad tracks go right by Hy-Vee. Near Highway 6 on the east and
west sides of the railroad tracks, the property is all zoned CC-2. He said he had been
looking for a long time for a piece of property for sale within a commercial area to budd
a building. Sobaski stated that he owns Iowa Paper & Chemical and has intended to build
a retail-type building and he basically fits under both zones for what he is trying to do. He
said HACAP is moving along as fast as possible in order to meet his commitments as far
as the bid for the proposal and acceptance.
Sobaski said he read the South District Plan and it does state the area to be considered
for CC-2 is within the gray shaded area. He said that commercial areas often change
from one zone to another at a road or the back or front of a property. Sobaski sa~d he
does not understand all the issues, but would ask for Commission support to build the
project. He stated that it is difficult to find a place where child care is a permitted use.
Sobaski said it seems like childcare is mostly permitted only by special exception.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 5
Sobaski said there are not many vacant lots available for an 8,000 square foot building,
much less ones with proper zoning for a child care use. He said the issue will probably
end up before the Commission at some point. He said he would like the Commission to
deal with it today. Gibson asked Sobaski if he would continue to own the building.
Sobaski said he would lease the building to HACAP and would not occupy any part of the
building. He said the property is 35,000 square feet in size. He said he intends to split
the lot and erect another, smaller building on the other part of it. It may be sold as a
second parcel under CC-2 zoning, possibly for an office use.
$obaski said there would be one entire 8,000 square foot building to house HACAP, with
approximately 2,500 square feet for the child care center. The rest of the building is for
offices and conference rooms for HACAP. On the other part of the lot, there would be a
proposed second building.
Public discussion closed,
MOTION: Scott moved to defer consideration of REZ96-0019, an application submit*
ted by Ed and Cheryl Sobaski to rezone approximately .76 acres located at the
southwest corner of Waterfront Drive and Southgate Avenue from C1-1, Intensive
Commercial, to CC-2, Community Commercial, to November 7. Gibson seconded
the motion.
Scott asked staff about the center section west of the railroad tracks and east of Gilbert
Street shown as CC-2 on the map and whether or not the tract was owned by one party.
Miklo said there are different ownerships. Scott asked if that area is to be zoned CC-2,
where it connects to any present CC-2 zone. Miklo said the map is general, but the CC-2
zoning would go all the way to the north to join the existing CC-2 zone that is along
Waterfront Drive and Highway 6. Miklo said the properties fronting on Gilbert Street would
be proposed for CC-2 zoning; those west of but not fronting on Gilbert Street would be
proposed to remain zoned C1-1. Scott asked how many nonconforming uses this would
create. Miklo said he would provide exact numbers at the next meeting.
Miklo reminded the Commission that Winebrenner Ford is moving from its site so a sizable
parcel will be available for redevelopment. Scott stated that if you then took CC-2 zoning
up Stevens Drive to include the present Winebrenner property, you could connect straight
across the present Waterfront Drive and to the CC.2 zoning at the Hy-Vee. Miklo re-
sponded that the proposal is that north of Stevens Drive also would be zoned CC-2. Scott
said that since it would create some nonconforming uses, there will then be the same
problem as with zoning the silver along the tracks to CC-2. Miklo said he does not beheve
rezoning only the silver without doing areas west of the railroad track is the best idea.
Scott said with the high concentration of users of daycare in this particular area, it be-
hooves the Commission to attempt to locate a use where the need exists. He said with
the new welfare reform bill, there will be a greater need for daylong daycare. Scott sa~d
some properties on the other side of Waterfront Drive, even though they would need
special exceptions under CC-2 zoning, are compatib!esocial service organizations. Miklo
said that the group homes are permitted by special exceptions in C1-1 and are not permit-
ted at all in the CC-2 zone. Scott asked if there is a more appropriate zone between C1-1
and CC-2 for some of these uses. Miklo said them is not.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 6
Miklo stated one of the reasons staff is proposing that this Gilbert Street area be rezoned
to CC-2 is due to the apparent lack of vacant CC-2 property in Iowa City. Also, it is an
area with good access to the highway and is therefore available community-wide. Miklo
said a child care facility is a special exception in most zones, including the CO-1 zone.
but it is not permitted at all in the C1-1 zone. Miklo said given the nature of the C1-1 zone,
staff questions whether it is appropriate to amend the Zoning Chapter to allow a daycare
center to locate in the C1-1 zone, but it is an option that could be studied more closely.
Miklo said group homes were allowed in the past in the Cl-1 zone, because there was
such difficulty locating them in residential areas that it was proposed to allow them in the
intensive commercial zone. Miklo said he would provide a list at the next meeting regard-
ing where daycare centers can locate.
Gibson said since the proposal for rezoning the whole area will be before the Commission
soon, they should just go ahead and do it instead of waiting. He said they will face the
same issues sooner or later. He cited the railroad as an important border. Miklo said staff
is reluctant to initiate a rezoning of the entire area until the South District Plan has been
adopted. He said there will need to be considerable discussion with the property owners
in the area prior to rezoning.
Scott stated that if such a large portion of the area is now vacant or soon will be, the
Commission should look to rezoning it in the near future as opposed to letting the area
develop piecemeal. He suggested the Commission should take a proactive stance in the
near future to accommodate CC-2 uses and not take a reactive stance. Scott said s~nce
by and large the tracts in the center are vacant, he would like to see the issue addressed
now before development begins occurring.
Chait asked if the Commission policy was not to do any spot zoning. Holecek responded
that spot zoning is an invalid zoning basis. The Commission should zone for individual
use on individual parcels of property. The regulatory nature must not be use-specific or
property-specific, but in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. Chair said the Commis-
sion should be clearer about the distinction of what is on the east side of Waterfront Drive.
He felt the proposed HACAP building would be a compatible use with what is now in the
neighborhood. Chait stated it is important to keep in mind that the daycare area would
be 2,500 square feet compared with the other 5,500 square feet of office area. Chair said
he sees the area now as spot zoned clusters with higher and lower densities all mixed
together. He remarked that this could be a good opportunity to explore possibilities for
appropriate zoning for the area. Chair said he does not believe the railroad track is a big
obstacle. Gibson said that if he were looking at the rezoning of the entire area and did not
have the Sobaski application in front of him, there would be no reason to include the
parcel east of the railroad track.
Holecek said you must be able to articulate something that certain properties have in
common; certain inherent characteristics having similar qualities that call for the properties
tO be zoned similarly. She said if you are discussing a larger area and can articulate the
qualities the properties have in common such as access or otherwise, that it is not neces-
sarily spot zoning, because it involves a larger area than just one parcel.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 7
Chait asked about changing the C1-1 zone to allow this type of use in a podion of the
proposed building. Miklo said it could be pursued, but the C1-1 zone is quasi-industrial.
He said staff had some concerns about having a child care facility next to an intensive
commercial use. Gibson said that if someone chooses to build a daycare center in that
zone, they must understand going in the inability to control the property next to them.
Chait said the domestic violence shelter is in the C1-1 zone, so why not have other social
services in the zone. Miklo remarked that group homes and transitional housing were
resisted in residential areas and so ended up in this area. Chait said he thought HACAP
may be resisted in many areas as well. He suggested changing the C1-1 zoning to allow
the daycare center as a provisional use.
The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
CZ-9641. Public discussion of an application submitted to Johnson County by W-Four
Partners to rezone approximately 20 acres located on the north side of Highway 1,
approximately one mile west of Sharon Center Road (W62) from A1, Agricultural, to RS-5
Suburban Residential.
Miklo reminded the Commission that the City has subdivision control within the two-mile
Fringe Area, where this property is located and can make recommendations to the County
on rezonings, He said the Fringe Area Agreement was recently amended and calls for
residential uses to be considered at one unit per ten acres or, if clustering is done, one
unit per five acres is permitted provided 80% of the tract is set aside as open space.
Miklo indicated that the applicant has expanded the rezoning to include approximately 22
acres to meet the 80% open space requirement. He said the state DOT sa~d the sight
distance in this location was not of concern to them. Miklo said staff recommends approv-
al of this rezoning and the appropriate action for the Commission would be to recommend
that the Council send a letter to the Johnson County Board of Supervisors recommending
approval.
Jakobsen asked if the applicants contemplate only one access to the property and Miklo
said that is correct, She suggested the Commission stipulate that in the motion.
Public discussion:
There was none.
Public discussion closed.
MOTION: Jakobsen moved to recommend that the City Council forward a letter to
the Johnson County Board of Supervisors recommending that CZ-9641, a request
to rezone approximately 22 acres from County A1 to County RS-5 be approved
subject to there being only one vehicular access road between this property and
Highway 1. Gibson se¢e~tded [he motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6~0.
CZ-9647. Public discussion of an application submitted to Johnson County by James
Anderson, Stephan Bender, and Tom Bender to fezone approximately 8.64 acres located
west of Prairie du Chien Road, approximately 1/4 mile north of Newport Road from A1,
Agricultural, to RS-3, Suburban Residential.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 8
Miklo stated that this property is in Fringe Area A, which allows the change of zoning from
Agricultural to RS-3 or one lot per three acres. The Commission recently recommended
approval of a rezoning of the properties to the north. He said the applicants are now
expanding that to include the additional area. Miklo said the requested rezoning for the
proposed area does comply with the Fringe Area Agreement, and staff recommends
approval. He pointed out that the Fringe Area Agreement and the North Corridor Plan
encourage clustering in this area, and the City will look at compliance with this policy
when the plat is submitted.
Public discussion:
There was none.
Public discussion closed.
MOTION: Supple moved to recommend that the City Council forward a letter to the
Johnson County Board of Supervisors recommending that CZ-9647 a request to
rezone approximately 8.64 acres located west of Prairie du Chien Road approximate-
ly 1/4 mile north of Newport Road, from A1 to RS-3 be approved. Chait seconded
the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 5-O-1, with Scott abstaininq.
Scott stated that he abstained from voting, because of an ownership interest in a parcel
that adjoins this piece of property.
DEVELOPMENTITEMS:
SUB96-0020. Public discussion of an application submitted by A. F. Streb for preliminary
plat approval of Scott-Six Industrial Park, a 140.5 acre, 41-1ot industrial/commercial
subdivision located in Johnson County on the east side of Scott Boulevard, north o!
Highway 6 (45-day, limitation period waived to October 17, 1996).
Miklo said there were some serious plat deficiencies, and the plat does not comply with
the City's subdivision standards. He said the applicant had not submitted a waiver of the
45-day limitation period at this point that would allow him more time to address the serious
deficiencies. He said that in the absence of a 45oday limitation waiver the Commission
would have to vote. Miklo said staff had spoken with MMS Engineering and they indicated
to him that they would either submit a letter of deferral or the applicant's position was not
changing. Staff had not yet received a letter.
Holecek said that the applicant does have the option of taking the matter to Council. She
stated that one basis for doing so would be clarification of deficiencies between the time
of denial by the Commission'and consideration by Council. Bovbjerg said the apphcant
also had the option of appearing at ton[ghrs meeting.
Scott said there was a clear indication on Monday night that there had to be a letter of
deferral or the issues had to be resolved. He stated that the applicant or his representa-
tives could have faxed or phoned in their intentions. Scott said he believes that they do
not intend to defer. Holecek stated that the Commission cannot know the intent of the
applicant. Miklo said that if the Commission does vote to deny the plat, it would be
appropriate to point out that the reason for denial is that it does not meet the technical
requirements and there are serious deficiencies.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 9
Scott asked about the fire hydrant issue and if anything had happened there. Miklo said
the fire department confirmed that they would like the standard placement of fire hydrants
adhered to, but the applicant was objecting to that, as of Monday.
Chait asked if the subdivision would be acceptable in the County. Jakobsen said that the
article in the paper said that County zoning officials had problems with the proposals also.
Bovbjerg asked if this also comes under the subdivision requirements of the Fringe Area
Agreement. Holecek said yes, the City can require City Design Standards in the Fringe
Area.
Chait asked why the Commission is asked to vote on the application if there are so many
deficiencies and discrepancies still outstanding. Scott said during two months of negotia-
tions, there was at least an indication of a willingness on the part of the City, a third
partner, and the Strebs to reach agreement on many of these items. He stated negotia-
tions had broken down, and the Strebs had indicated they would take their chgnces and
go to Council at this point.
Public discussion:
Richard Rhodes, 2014 Rochester Avenue, said he feels the location is an appropriate
place for an industrial park, considering the pre-existing development and transportation
infrastructure adjacent to the site. He therefore does not oppose an industrial park devel-
opment in this area.
Rhodes said he does agree with staff that the present plat is really not an industrial park,
because of the number of small lots along the western margin of the tract that are obvi-
ously designed for commercial establishments of some sort, rather than industrial develop-
ment. Rhodes did not see commercial development as appropriate along this portion of
Scott Boulevard. He felt it conflicts with Iowa City's Comprehensive Plan.
Rhodes also felt that developments contiguous with and adjacent to iowa City's corporate
boundaries and developments that draw heavily on City services should be annexed so
that they contribute to the City's tax base to support those services. Rhodes said that
since individual property owners may wish to be annexed, once the area has been
developed, to get full access to City services, the subdivision should be to full City Design
Standards. He also stated he does not believe that the City should provide water and
sewer to areas outside of its own limits.
Rhodes said the entire area drains into an unnamed northern branch of Snyder Creek,
which drains farther south on the Sycamore Farms tract into a large wetland complex. He
said the City is required by the terms of a contract signed several years ago with the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect the wetlands on the
Snyder Creek bottoms. Rhodes said special attention should therefore be paid to the
treatment of storm water drainage from an industrial area. He said that it is disturbing that
there is no storm water management plan in place or proposed for this subdivision. He
added that an appropriate storm water management plan here would probably have two
or three integrated areas to treat runoff.
Rhodes referred to two areas on the map that he said should have separate storm water
management structures to treat runoff before it gets into the creek branch. He said that
the large eastern 9/10 of the tract should have a storm water management system of ~ts
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 10
own. He cited Chicago and Detroit industrial parks that use such things as storm water
management basins as amenities for the industrial park. Rhodes said a centrahzed one
here could serve that same purpose. He added that it would be environmentally sensible
to be able to isolate any spills or accidents from those industrial sites from flowing straight
into the creek.
Public discussion closed.
MOTION: Chait moved to recommend approval of SUB96-0020. preliminary plat
approval of Scott-Six Industrial Park, a 140.5 acre, 41-1ot industrial/commercial
subdivision located in Johnson County on the east side of Scott Boulevard, north
of Highway 6. Supple seconded the motion.
Jakobsen stated that she would vote against the motion because of all the deficiencies.
She said it should be developed to City standards.
Scott commented that there aren't any items as enumerated in Kugler's memo dated
October 17, 1996 that can be compromised either from the standpoint of precedence or
from the standpoint of future negotiations with this developer/applicant or any develop-
er/applicant. He stated that this Commission and the City Council must remain absolutely
firm on these issues.
The motion failed on a vote of 0-6.
MOTION: Jakobsen moved to deny approval of SUB96-0020, the preliminary plat
of Scott-Six Industrial Park, a 140.5 acre, 41-1ot industrial/commercial subdivision
located in Johnson County on the east side of Scott Boulevard, north of Highway 6.
Scott amended the motion to more clearly delineate why the Commission is recommend-
ing denial.
MOTION: Scott moved to deny approval of SUB96-0020, preliminary plat approval
of Scoff-Six Industrial Park, a 140.5 acre, 41-1ot industrial/commercial subdivision
located in Johnson County on the east side of Scott Boulevard, north of Highway
6 for the following reasons: 1) subdivision design issues including: a) improper lot
configuration, i.e., the subdivision ordinance prohibits the use of double frontage
lots unless good platting indicates their use, b) inappropriate design of 420th Street,
and c) the lack of IDNR approval for Snyder Creek relocation; 2) lack of compliance
with City design standards: a) lack of storm water management provisions, b) lack
of sidewalks, c) lack of fire hydrants as required by City standards, and d) inade-
quate provisions regarding the waste water disposal and water supply systems; and
3) the Commission recommends to the City Council that no change be made in the
City policy regarding connections to municipal water and sewer systems by any
property that remains in the unincorporated area of the County. Gibson seconded
the motion. The motion to deny carried on a vote of 6°0.
SUB96-0023. Public discussion of an application submitted by Staples, Inc. for prelimi-
nary plat approval of A Fiesubdivision of Lot 2, Westport Plaza, an 11.41 acre, 2-lot com-
mercial subdivision located south of Ruppert Road.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 11
Miklo stated that this subdivision plat will take Lot 2 of Westport Plaza and divide it into
two lots, one of them containing file existing Cub Foods and one of them containing the
proposed Staples store. He said that the plat as submitted is in order for approval, and
staff recommends that SUB96-0023 be approved.
Public discussion:
There was none.
Public discussion closed.
MOTION: Chait moved to recommend approval of SUB96-0023, a preliminary plat
of A Resubdivision of Lot 2, Westport Plaza, an 1~.41 acre, 2-lot commercial subdi-
vision located south of Ruppert Road. Jakobsen seconded the motion.
The motion carried on a vote of 6-0.
CONSIDERATION OF THE OCTOBER 3, 1996, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES:
MOTION: Gibson moved to approve the minutes of the October 3, 1996, meeting of the
Planning and Zoning Commission. Chalt seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 5-0-1,
with Jakobsen abstaining due to absence.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Public discussion of a request submitted by Alan Saltzman to permit hotels and motels
in the CC-2 zone.
Miklo cited the letter from Saltzman. He said hotels and motels are currently not allowed
in the CC-2 zone, given that it is primarily a retail zone. Miklo said if the Commission
would like to study the possibility, it must be decided what priority it would be given in
relationship to the priority list attached to the agenda. Miklo said if the Commission puts
the item on the pending list, staff would do some research and prepare an amendment.
He said that after research, staff may or may not recommend approval of allowing hotels
and motels in the CC-2 zone by special exception.
Chait asked about the time frame. Miklo said the applicant was pursuing the possibility
of development on Riverside Drive, but had not indicated his time frame. He assumed the
sooner the better.
Public discussion:
There was none.
Public discussion closed.
MOTION: Supple moved to put on the pending list a request to staff to look at
permitting hotels and motels in the CCo2 zone. Gtbson seconded the motion.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 12
Jakobsen asked where to put the item on the pending list. She felt that the item has low
priority compared to other items on the pending list. Scott suggested putbng the item at
the bottom.
The motion carried on a vote of 5-1, with Jakobsen votincl no.
Public discussion of a request submitted by Stephen N. Greenleaf to amend the definition
of "elder family home."
Bovbjerg said this is another issue to consider studying and/or putting on the pending list.
Miklo had no additional information beyond the letter and handout submitted by Stephen
Greenleaf.
Jakobsen stated that if this does go on the pending list, the Commission should also ask
staff to review the need for "mother-in-law apartments." Miklo said the Code currently
allows them in all zones with no special exceptions. He said they are called accessory
apartments and noted there are some size limitations. Miklo added that the property
owner is required to file an affidavit with the Housing and Inspection Services Department.
Chait said that when the house is sold, he believes the affidavit goes with the abstract so
that the buyer is on notice when they review the abstract.
Public discussion:
Stephen N. Greenleaf, 1402 Willow Creek Court, stated that he represents clients who are
interested in making an improvement to the elder family housing provision in the Iowa City
zoning ordinance. He said the purpose would be to provide new housing stock and allow
for an alternative between a nursing home and single-family residence or even the elder
family group home, which is distinguished in the zoning ordinance, Greenleaf said the two
sentences he proposes adding are to provide some more special accommodation for
residents in elder family housing.
Greenleaf said density is not changed by this proposed amendment. He cited Longfellow
Manor as an example. Greenleaf said that strictly speaking he does not think the Mary
O. Coldren Home is elder family housing and that, in fact, there is no elder family housing
now in Iowa City.
Greenleaf said inspection is required by the Iowa Code, and the City must be notified if
there is a violation. He added that the City could also initiate further inspection beyond
that already mandated by the State of Iowa. Greenleaf said the issue of students and
apartments is not a reality, and that with elder family housing, in a zone such as RS-8.
there would either be single family residences or elder family housing.
Greenleaf stated that the amenibes would include small stoves, microwaves, sinks, and
refrigerators and these are not intended to replace a common kitchen. He cited a letter
from Jane Doman that was distributed to the Commission. Greenleaf said that at this
point, he is just asking the Commission to put the matter on its pending list. Greenleaf
said the developer wants to plan parameters for the building. He said there is a demand
and a need for this kind of housing, therefore he would like the concept to be considered.
Public discussion closed.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 13
Jakobsen asked how long it would take staff to review the matter, and Miklo replied that
he anticipated that it would be about a two-month process. Bovbjerg asked which items
on the pending list are essential. Miklo responded that staff is currently working on items
1 through 4 and hopes to bnng these before the Commission soon. He said that ~tem 5
is one that the Council added recently and indicated that they wanted to give it their
highest priority when the things from last year, which are items 1-4, are completed.
Chait asked what zones this request for a new elder family concept would be allowed in
now. Miklo said it would be allowed in all residential zones. Chair said the essential
question is then whether to allow them in RS-5 and RS-8 zones. Miklo said this is
basically correct.
Gibson stated that there are places to find this kind of housing right now. Scott said he
did not have much objection to the request if, in fact, all of the provisions were included,
i.e. 55 or older. Bovbjerg said that the current definition specifies "the majority of whom
are elders." Gibson asked what is prohibiting anyone from living in that environment if the
majority requirement is met.
Chair expressed concern that eight independent units in a building could be viewed as
apartments and would not be a group/family type of situation, but could be in an R$-5 or
an RS-8 zoned neighborhood. Miklo said the current ordinance would allow a group of
eight people to live together in a family environment in an RS-5 or an RS-8 zone.
Jakobsen stated that there was nothing in the proposed ordinance that required a com-
mon kitchen.
Chait said that he sees it as a great concept that could be very beneficial to older and
handicapped people, but he has a problem with putting it into single family neighborhoods.
Scott asked Greenleaf if there were any tax advantages to calling it "elder family home"
as opposed to building an apartment with eight units and a common living and dining
room. Greenleaf said he did not know. Bovbjerg asked if there were any tax or inspection
differences between RM and RS zones. Holecek said she did not know specifics, but
assumed they are the same.
Scott stated that the idea had potential, but he would not .drop it down to the RS zones.
MiKIo said there is another provision in the zoning ordinance that allows elder housing,
and someone can apply for that and designate it as an elder housing development and
would get a break on parking. He said that it can be done in all the multi-family zones.
Chait asked if this is allowed in an RS-8 zone if it means 1 6 potential pods in one parcel,
since RS-8 includes duplexes. Scott said he thought you could do almost everything
Greenleaf wants to do under the present ordinance, except in the RS-5 and RS-8 zones.
Miklo said that currently you could convert an existing house to an elder group home in
any zone, but could not have the individual kitchens. Bovbjerg suggested taking some
action on the matter, rather than none at all. Greenleaf suggested that the Commission
refer the issue to staff, considering the length of discussion.
Scott asked Greenleaf if he would be willing to do research on the issue, with some
assistance from staff, to specify why it would be an exception to what is presently allowed.
Greenleaf stated that what was originally submitted to the Housing and Inspection Depart-
ment for a b~Jilding permit included a kitchen and was therefore called an apartment.
Planning & Zoning Commission
October 17, 1996
Page 14
However, they had no specific definition for an apartment. He said he would be willing to
work with staff, but did not know where it would go, based on previous discussions.
Greenleaf said his goal is to have the Commission look at the homes in RS as well as RM
zones.
MOTION: Scott moved to put the question of amending the definition of "elder
family home" on the pending list. Supple seconded the motion.
Scott said he does not support the idea in RS zones. Gibson said he is concerned that
the request may include a fundamental change.
The motion failed on a vote of 0-6.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION INFORMATION:
Miklo stated that there is a Community Housing Forum at the Public Library in Meeting Room A
on Wednesday night, October 23 at 6:30 p.m. He said everyone is invited. There may be some
zoning issues that come up at the forum.
MOTION: Jakobsen moved to adjourn at 9:50 p.m. Gibson seconded. The motion carried on
a vote of 6-0.
Lea Supple, Secretary
Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte.
IOWA CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17, 19~6- 7:$0 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SIGN IN SHEET
2.
3.
4.
Name
Z
10.
1!.
12.
13.
14.
15.
17.
18.
19.
MINUTES
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
OCTOBER 28, 1996 - 4:00 P.M.
IOWA CITY PUBLIC WORKS CONFERENCE ROOM - CIVIC CENTER
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Martin Haynes, Karyl Larson, Phil Reisetter, Randy Rohovit, Clara
Swan, and Daryl Woodson.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Gary Nagle and Bill Nowysz.
STAFF PRESENT:
Jeffrey McKinney, David Schoon.
OTHERS PRESENT: None.
CALL TO ORDER:
Meeting called to order at 4:15 p.m.
CONSIDERATION OF A FINAL DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR EXTERIOR ALTER-
ATIONS TO SUITE 160, OLD CAPITOL MALL, LOCATED NORTH OF THE CLINTON STREET
MALL ENTRANCE.
Haynes informed the Committee that the issue will be deferred until the applicants decide to bring
their proposal before the committee again. Schoon added that the existing planter was construct-
ed I foot into the right of way. This issue will have to be resolved.
4:20: Karyl Larson ardves.
A mobon to defer the issue was made by Woodson and seconded by Reisetter. The motion
passed 5-0.
DISCUSSION REGARDING THE DESIGNATION OF A DESIGN REVIEW DISTRICT:
Determining Design Review District Areas. Haynes asked the Committee how such a set of
guidelines should be developed and incorporated into a report.
4:30: Randy Rohovit arrives.
Woodson suggested that the best approach would involve the designation of a large general
district (the entire downtown and the Near Southside) that could later be broken into sub-districts
with s~milar design characteristics over time. Haynes countered this point by proposing that the
Committee start with a small district and expand from that. Unknowns such as the future of the
downtown and the Near Southside require a conservative proposal. Woodson asserted that a
large district would provide the Committee with a readied inventory for review and sub-diwsion.
Haynes argued that establishing a larger district would require a more labor-intensive survey.
Schoon added that the Committee should m~nimize its survey costs in an effort to reduce the
possibility of surveying areas that may never be designated as design d~stricts. Schoon asked the
Committee to think about which would be easier to sell to the city council and property owners,
a large district with general guidelines or a smaller district with more specific guidelines.
In response to a question posed by Swan, Schoon noted that the Committee has no distnct
limitations within the given overlay zone area. Woodson suggested that the proposed district
should carry from Court St. to Madison St. to Gilbert St. and to Iowa Avenue. The district should
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
OCTOBER 28, 1996
PAGE 2
also include the leg of the CB-5 zone that runs down Gilbert Street to Prentiss. Haynes added
that, while he believes the initial district should be small, it should include more than just the CB-
10 zone. The Committee agreed that its first district should include the CB-5 and CB-10 zones.
Developing Buildlng/Streetscape Survey Forms, Haynes stated that survey forms should
provide the Committee with the information needed to determine guidelines based on desired or
prevalent styles. He then asked for volunteers to spearhead the formation of this survey form.
Swan suggested that it would be easier to get volunteers if an itinerary were provided. Schoon
added that the volunteers should include at least one architect and one lay person. Woodson
then volunteered for one of the positions and Haynes stated that he would speak with absent
committee members to identify another volunteer. If he could not find another volunteer, Haynes
agreed to volunteer.
DISCUSSION REGARDING EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS:
Brochures and Other Written Materials. Haynes stated that Schoon updated the existing
brochures. Haynes will review the brochures and present them to the Committee.
Design Clinics. Rohovit informed the Committee that the Chamber could help sponsor the
clinics, however, they need to be attached to an already existing Chamber of Commerce function.
Haynes added that he believes the clinic idea is a valid one, He added that there is no time limit
for establishing the clinics, so the options can be studied thoroughly. In addition, Haynes noted
that he came across a video chronicling downtown maintenance in Portland, Chattanooga and
another city. The name of the video is "Back From the Brink" and he suggests that the DRC look
into broadcasting the program on public access television or PBS. He believes that the program
addresses several issues relevant to Iowa City's downtown.
Rohovit mentioned that similar materials are produced by the Regional/Urban Design Assistance
team. Haynes stated that a committee member or staff will contact them. He added that several
other videos are produced for children that could be shown in local school career education
programs.
INFORMATION ON THE DOWNTOWN STRATEGY COMMITTEE:
Schoon stated that the Downtown Strategy Committee would like to offer a public forum as their
current meetings do not allow for active public participation. He added that their public forum will
be held on Thursday, November 14 in the Senior Center Assembly room. These meetings will
address very general issues and attempt to establish a vision and strategy for downtown along
with a common understanding of the community's goals. Haynes questioned the DSC's ability
to avoid specific issues.
CONSIDERATION OF SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 DRC MEETING MINUTES:
Swan pointed out the fact that her name was not included under "Absent Committee Members".
Woodson moved and Reisetter seconded that the minutes be approved as amended. The
motion passed by a vote of 6-0.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
OCTOBER 28, 1996
PAGE 3
COMMIl'rEE DISCUSSION:
Haynes stressed the importance of having a quorum present at every scheduled meeting to avoid
cancellations.
Reisetter shared details regarding the design of parking ramps in San Francisco. These garages
used planters on each level to soften the appearance of the ramp,
ADJOURNMENT:
The motion to adjourn was made by Swan and seconded by Woodson at 5:35 p.m, The motion
passed by a vote of 6-0,
Minutes submitted by Jeffrey McKinney.
Agenda item 3A
i%m'4UTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
2ND FLOOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
THURSDAY, APRil, 25. 1996 - 5:00 P.M.
Members Present:
Margaret Cox, Stephen Greenleaf, Philip Hubbard, Mary McMurray, Mark
Martin, Jesse Singerman, Anne Spencer (arrived at 5:15, left at 6'00 p.m.).
Jim Swaim, Chuck Traw
Staff' Present:
Barb Black. Maeve Clark. Susan Craig, Larry Eckholt, Debb Green. Martha
Lubaroff, Liz Nichols
Others Present'
Eleanor Dilkes, Assistant City Attorney
CALL TO ORDER:
Greenleaf called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m
APPROVAL OFM/NUTES.
The minutes for the meeting of March 28 were approved as submitted after a motion by
Martin/Greenleaf. All voted Aye and the motion was passed unanimously.
UNF1NISH~ED BUSINESS
Closed session to discuss property acquisition.
President Traw recommended going into closed session in order to discuss the acquisition of real
estate. A motion was made by Greenlea_rand seconded by Martin. A rollcall vote was taken and all
present voted Aye. Let the minutes reflect that dunng the closed session, the acquisition of real estate
was discussed. A tape recorder was started. This portion of the discussion began at 5 20 p.m. and
ended at 5:45 p.m..
A motion to resume the open meeting was made by Martin and seconded by Greenleafi All sio~tified
approval by voting Aye. The Board then resumed the regular meeting.
Follow up on Building project meeting with City Council, Monday, April 22.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
APRIL 25, 1996
Pa~e 2
Agenda item 3A
In summary the Board felt it was a good presentation Traw presented a history of the project over
the last three years culminating in the current plan. Drawings of the proposed building and the site
were displayed by Jeff Scherer, architect. and questions were answered. The goal of this
informational session was to bring City Council up to date and answer questions The Board
believed that it had accomplished these go~s and in addition identified areas of concern from Council
members for the Board to address more completely Craig reported that she had a recent
conversation with a downtom businessman regarding Lot 64 IA as an option. Craig replied that she
felt that it has not been an option due to Council position and the current marketing plan only vaguely
mentions the library.
Trustees were polled regarding their response to the Council session Singerman stated that the
Board had much ground to cover in terms of informing Council and the public about the need for
an expanded central library as opposed to branches. The design seems to be a point of contention
for some City Council members. Some affirmative action is'needed to promote the design Swmm
suggested that the Board raise the issue of 64 I A as an option in order to clear up any concerns of'
the public. A suggestion was made to prepare some sort of briefing paper for Trustees in order to
respond to the public efficiently. A goal of Trusteeship is to educate the public and provide
information to the public and Council.
Craig is working with the City's Finahce Director to' obtain accurate figures on the amount of
property tax average homeowners would pay.
Eckholt reported on discussions with the fundraising consultant selected by the Foundation. The
consultant believes that a part of the cost can be raised with a private fund raising campaign. but
actual figures would not be available until after the referendum was passed. He felt comfortable
~ying gifts "in the million dollar range" Eckholt reported a ~eat deal of support from the Friends
Foundation Board. They feel very stron~y about the concept of enhancing the downtown with the
proposed building.
A steering committee was assembled to work on preparing and presenting information to the Council
and public with an aim to bring a referendum to the voters in November. Singerman was appointed
to chair it through the first meeting. Martin, Hubbard and Spencer agreed to serve on it. The first
meeting is scheduled for May 2.
A suggestion of hiring a public relations professional was raised. Craig cautioned the Board that tax
dollars could not be spent on a campai~ that promotes one side of an election referendum. When
that time comes, a Referendum Cornmit~ee would be needed to raise money and campaign for a YES
vote. Craig will provide more information on Referendum Committees.
ICPL BOAR~ OF TRUSTEES
APRIL 25, 1996
Page 3
Agenda i~em 3A
NEW BUSIlxrESS
Prozram Policy Revie~v
This policy was reviexved and new lan=-,uage drafted by Black and Green. Much of the language was
removed to keep it policy oriented and not procedural Craig related some examples of problems
with co-sponsored programs when the library. was approached to provide facility support including
use of limited staff for room arrangements and cable casting with no participation in program planning
or content.
A motion was made to adopt the revised policy' Manin/Singerman All in thvor The morion passed
unanimously.
Cable Television Programmine Policy
The primary issue in this policy review was a recommendation that, given the current lack of
community programnfing resources, we provide limited support to groups meeting in the meeting
room who want to have their meeting telecast on the/:hannel. Procedures will be developed to
support this policy. In response to a question regarding fiber-optics, Craig stated that when that
capability arrives it will most likely fall under our Meeting Room policy.
A motion was made to adopt the revised policy by Greenleaf/Cox All were in favor The motion
passed unanimously
S T ,~'F REPORTS
The State Legislature's failure to pass the budget bill funding library services is of concern Two
versions, one supportive of library needs, the other calling for budget cuts and removing power from
the State Library Commission are currently being debated.
Planning process update. Craig described the series ofbrainstomfing sessions in which staff has been
participating. Some good work has come out of them. These sessions are preparatory to a plan
update for FY98
The shelving crisis has passed. In order to get out from under, extra resources were added. With
exlra help, in the last few weeks, Craig feels that we're over the peak that occurs around this time of
year.
Development Office report. Eckholt distributed an addendum to the report included in the packet
The Friends Foundation Investment Comnmtee completed a review of the management of the
Endowment fund. As of July I the fund will be managed by Hills Bank.
ICPL BOARD 0F TRUSTEES
APRIL 25, 1996
Page 4
Agenda item 3A
Craig requested moving the time line to July for official approval of the (Non Operating Budget
Undesignated) NOBU budget which was previously approved in the spring. A tentative budget is
now prepared in September so waiting for carryover balances of the funds seemed appropriate.
Board agreed.
Article on new San Francisco Library
PRESIDENT'S REPORT
None
ANNOUNCEIVIENT FROM MEMBERS
Apologies from Swalm who had to miss Foundation Board meetings this past year due to a serious
illness and difficult schedule.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Director's Evaluation. Evaluation forms were distributed. They should be returned to Martha by
May 10.
FINANCIAL REPORTS
Financial reports through the third quarter were reviewed including the Girls and Bequests report and
FY96 receipts.
Biggest receipt is the fine income and we've already collected 94% of what we projected at the end
of this year.
FY96 Expenditures
Expenditures at nine months show that at this point we've spent 75% of our budget.
Use R e__~e.~
Output Statistics through the 3rd quarter show biggest gain in the use of electronic information
resources including dial-in.
Circulation is up slightly.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
APRIL 25, 1996
Page 5
Agenda item 3A
DISBURSEMENTS
The Visa expenditures for March 1996 were reviewed.
Disbursements for March 1996 were approved. Singerman/Martin
SET AGENDA ORDER FOR MAY MEET1NG
Derek Mauer from PATV board requests a discussion item regarding space for access tv in proposed
facility. He will be on agenda.
ADJOURNMENT:
Co 'x/iVlartin adjourned at 6.30 pro.
Minutes recorded and transcribed by
Martha Lubaroff
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
REGULAR FIEETING
2ND FLOOR ADMINISTP~ATIVE
THURSDAY, May 23, 1996
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CONFERENCE ROOM
5:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITF_AI 3A
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Staff Present:
'~4argaret Cox, Stephen
Greenleaf, Philip Hubbard,
Mark Martin, Jesse Singerman,
Anne Spencer, Jim Swaim,
Chuck Traw
Mary McMurray
Barb Black, Maeve Clark, Susan Craig, Larr7
Eckholt, Uebb Green, Martha Lubaroff, Lzz
Nichols, Liz Nichols
Others Present:
Derek Maurer, Chair of the PATV Board, Renee
Paine, Director of PATV; Eleanor Dllkes,
Assistant City Attorney
CALL TO ORDER:
Traw called the meeting
A~PROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the regular meeting
approved. Martin/Spencer
to order at 5:05 p.m.
of April 25, 1996 were
NEW BUSINESS
Derek Maurer, Chair of the PATV Board requested an opportunity to
address the board about the rental of space in the proposed
expansion. He understands that part of the 25,000 square feet
designated for commercial use might be available, probably ~n the
less expensive basement space. Maurer indicated that they are
very interested in continuing to share a physical space with the
library and would like to participate in discussions about that
possibility. He expressed concern regarding their status during
renovation and whether they would have to relocate during that
period. Craig explained that if we agreed to joint occupancy in a
new space, we would work with them to remain in the current space
which might be disrupted, but not closed. If we were unable to
come to some agreement, they would have to vacate. Maurer
reviewed for the Board members the reciprocal plan that has been
in place whereby PATV offers production services in return for
occupancy. Those production services could be part of the
ICPL BOARD OF ~USTEES
May 23, 1996
PAGE 2
AGENDA IT'EA,! 3A
discussion for the future although 5hey understood that financial
compensation would also be needed. Hubbard asked who is
responsible for the programs aired on PATV. Paine explained that
it is the individual_producer's responsibility; PATV is the
conduit. Swaim asked about space needs and whether they have
thought about their requirements. A possibility of some joint
plan with the City's cable department was mentioned. Currently
PATV occupies about 1100 square feet which are not really
adequate. They would want to add several hundred square feet.
$waim expressed his enthusiasm for continuing the close
relationship with PATV in order to enhance the library's cable
offerings.
b~F!NI SHED BUSINESS
Closed session to discuss property acquisition.
President Traw recommended going into a closed session in order
5o discuss acquisition of real estate. A motion was made by
Greenleaf and seconded by Martin. A rollcall vote was taken and
all present voted Aye. Let the minutes reflect that during the
closed session, the acquisition of real estate was discussed. A
tape recorder was begun.. This portion-of the discussion began
at 5:15 p.m. and ended at 6:00 p.m..
A motion was made by Greenleaf and seconded by Martin to come out
of closed session and resume the open portion of our Board
meeting. All were unanimous in their approval.
Continuation of New Business
A discussion of the forthcoming meeting with City Council, May
28, at 5:00 p.m.. Note change in time. The meeting will take
place in Council Chambers.
As Craig understands it, the format is a joint meeting between
Library Board and City Council. The setting will be informal.
The Mayor requested the meeting. Craig asked if she could
prepare any information. The response was that this was just an
opportunity to get together to discuss issues.
Discussion of strategy for the Council meeting emphasized
positive answers to possible concerns. The project is expensive.
It also meets the needs in an attractive, accessible manner with
great care taken to allow for growth. It has been a long
process. Expert advice has been sought and taken. Designing the
project should not occur at the meeting- The only two reasons
Council members may have for not supporting putting the issue on
the ballot are protecting the public from a bad project cra
desire to avoid perceived personal political fallout. The Board
is unanimous in their belief that this is the best project to
bring to the voters.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
May 23, 1996
PAGE 3
AGE. N'DA IT~I 3A
Library Expansion Project Strategy Committee Report
At this time, Singerman, on behalf of the committee which
consists of herself, Martin, Hubbard, Craig, Eggers, Dave Van
Dusseldorf, Eckholt~_ Spencer, reported. They have met twice. Tke
mission statement for the committee is to convince the Iowa City
coramunity who would ~hen convince the City Council to put the
facility issue on the ballot. They hope to act as a catalyst %c
build support and, to get on the ballot. They worked on
developing a list of Frequently Asked Questions. This will be
available to Trustees, Friends Foundation Boards, library star=
core library supporters. A shorter piece is being developed fcr
broader distribution as well as an article in the WINDOW with a
condensed format of the FAQ and a picture of the proposed
expansion. There will also b~ a d!splay on the main floor of 5Y.~
library. The committee will meet agaiq on June 3. It was
requested that the FAQ be sent to City Councilors prior to
Monday's meeting and that a question sua%marizing the profess~cna
assistance received be added.
STAFF REPORTS
University Heights. Since it had be~n' some time since the
Council of University Heights had been approached by Coralville
Public Library and Iowa City Public Library regarding a contracu,
Coralville Director Heidi Lauritzen followed up. The Council Ls
still interested but have been delayed, and haven't sent out a
planned survey to the residents. They will discuss the conten5z
of the survey at their June meeting. Craig reco~unended delayin~
the review of fee card rates. No action necessary. Board
agreed.
JCCN updates. Johnson County Community Network recently had an
unveiling of their World Wide Web home page. This will serve as
a prototype for a public meeting set for September. Cities of
Iowa City, Coralville, Iowa City Schools, Chamber of Commerce,
Johnson County & Council of Governments organizations is
involved.
Programming Policy. In follow up to the Board's Review of
703, Cable TV Program_ming Policy, Black received an opinion from
Assistant City Attorney Burnside who recommended that the
sections pertaining to the appeal process be included in polic!es
for access channels. This will be done.
Development Office Report - Report was included in the packe5.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
May 23, 1996
PAGE 4
AGF2qDA/TEN/3A
State Library budget news. Craig reported that the budget news
was good as a result of much lobbying on several library issues
of policy and budget.
Tax season: The library distributed 136,422 forms.
Readings: Craig included an article for the Board's information
regarding public libraries and the need to have information
available electronically.
PRESIDENT'S REPORT
Traw appointed a Nominating Committee of the following Board
members: Greenleaf, Cox, Hubbard. Hubbard will chair.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
See above.
DISBURSEMENTS
Visa expenditures for April 96 were reviewed.
Disbursements for April, 9~ were approved. Greenleaf/Swaim
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. after a motion by
Martin/Greenleaf.
Minutes taken and transcribed by
Martha Lubarof f
AGENDA ITEM 3A
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
2ND FL00RADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
THURSDAY, JUNE 27, 1996 5:15 P.M.
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Staff Present:
Others Present:
Margaret Cox, Stephen Greenleaf, Philip
Hubbard, Mary McMurray, Jesse Singerman,
Swaim, Anne Spencer, Chuck Traw
Mark Martin
Barb Black, Maeve Clark, Susan Craig, Larry
Eckholt, Debb Green, Martha Lubaroff, Liz
Nichols
Eleanor Dilkes, Assistant City Attorney,
Brian Sharp, Press Citizen, Gary Sanders,
citizen of Iowa City, Daniel West, CPMI,
Construction management company
Jim
O_ALL TO ORDER:
Traw called the meeting to order ~t '5:15 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
Gary Sanders addressed the board with his concerns about the
proposed building design. He complimented the Board, and library
staff for the time and effort that have gone into the expansion
plans. He is a heavy user of the library and is appreciative of
all the services that are offered and the need to expand the
building. He stated that he is not in favor of a branch; that
the library should remain downtown, and spoke about the public's
perception of the current plans. He feels that the controversy
over the current design; in particular, the tower, has drawn the
focus of the community away from the greater need for an expanded
library and the benefit of such an expansion to downtown. He
reco~=~tends modification of the design in order to get more public
support and would encourage the Board to continue moving ahead.
~T. OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the regular meeting of May 23 were approved
unanimously after a motion. McMurray/Singerman
EXECuTIVE SESSION
Traw requested an executive session for the purpose of discussing
the personnel evaluation requested by Craig. In addition, he
asked to have a discussion regarding the acquisition of property
during this session. A motion was made by Greenleaf and seconded
by Singe~,~,~n. A rollcall vote was taken and all present voted
Aye. Let the minutes reflect that during the closed session, the
evaluation of the Director, and the acquisition of real estate
was discussed. This portion of the meeting began at 5:30 p.m.
and was recorded by .tape.
AGENDA iTEM 3A
A motion was made to adjourn the closed session. Singerman/Cox.
All signified by saying Aye. The open meeting resumed at 6:30
p.m.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Building Project:
Dan West of CPMI prepared documents for the Board's information.
In an attempt to respond to a council 'member's suggestion to
build under the pedestrian plaza, West worked up an estimate of'
costs using the gross square footage contained in the most recent
version of the proposal, completing second floor of current
building and adding other space below ground. He estimated
22,240 GSF at a cost of $214/sq.feet. He explained that the
biggest expense would be to dig a .large, deep hole in a small
space. Ths cost estimates for sheet piling, hauling away dirt,
fill sand, additional waterproofing, a roof structure that would
have to bear a heavier load due to its location in a fire lane,
the maintenance of a waterproof condition as a result of being in
a fire lane were all included in his estimate. Utility
relocation cost is an unsupported $50,000 expense and he stated
that he believes this is a low number. West had a conversation
with the architect who said that if we were to build underground,
it would be necessary to have an atriu~n and skylights in order to
give a feeling of space and light. This would drive the cost up.
He believes that he has made reasonable assumptions with the
information he had. It would be fair to assume 10 to 15% more
dollars per square footage thanpr he shows. Although the total
project cost may be less with this est±mate, the cost for the
library space is significantly more.
The second part of his report was in response to council members
interested in features of the building that could possibly be
eliminated in an effort to reduce the cost. The maximum
reduction could be $1,510,000; more than half of that amount
would be related to the structural capacity necessary to support
a 3rd and 4th level. That would redyce growth room in the
future. Categories of eliminating costs were listed. Eckholt
pointed out that removing the distinctive feature of the tower,
squaring up the space and making it brick amounts to a savings of
$85,000. This option would not change the square footage but may
affect the quality of atmosphere in the building since some of
these changes may reduce light levels in the building. Traw
pointed out that at this time this estimate is the best we can do
ICPL B~ OF TRUSTEES
without a complete architectural workup. The only other option
is to reduce square footage.
Traw asked for questions. One question concerned the financial
difference between funding the structural capacity for a 3rd and
4th floors? West responded that three fourths of the expense
would be for the 3rd floor in relation to one fourth for a 4th
floor. He stated that there are always soft costs and would
factor in 25% for non-building costs. He noted that these
opinions are not those of the architects, Meyer, Scherer &
Rockcastle. Craig informed the Board that she received a fax
from the architect which stated the features they wanted to
protect were the light features, and windows. Also, unsupported
by the architect was the change from brick to an exterior
insulated finishing system.
AGENDA ITEM 3A
It was agreed that a special meeting would be held before the
City Council meeting on the 15th. The Board will meet on
Tuesday, July 9 at 5:00 p.m.. Dan We~t was thanked for coming.
NEW BUSINESS
Approve FY97 contracts with Regional agencies:
East Central & Southeast Regipnal Library Systems contract.
Approved unanimously after a motion by Greenleaf/Cox
2. East Central Regional Library System contract. Approved
unanimously after a motion by Singerman/Cox
Open Access contract. Approved unanimously after a motion
by Greenleaf/Spencer
Access Plus contract. Approved unanimously after a motion.
Cox/Spencer
Co~u~it tee Reports
A. Director Evaluation Committee
The conmdttee, which consisted of Singerman, Greenleaf, Cox,
co~u~ended Craig on her outstanding performance during the last
year. Her coR~nunication with the Board in terms of library
policies, her updating the Board in matters of budget, and her
involvements in the community have been valuable and the
conm%ittee recoL~u~ended a salary increase of 6.75%. Greenleaf
moved that the Board adopts the reco~u~endation of the Evaluation
Committee, commends Director Craig for her fine work and
recommends to Council the increment of 6.75. Cox seconded the
motion and the vote was unanimously in favor.
DISBURS~WNTS
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Disbursements for the month of May 1996 were approved unanimously
after a motion by Singerman/Cox
Greenleaf moved that we continue the balance of the agenda at
special meeting on July 9. Spencer seconded and the vote was
unanimous.
the
~DJOURNMRNT:
The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Spencer/Cox.
after a motion by
Minutes taken and transcribed by
Martha Lubaroff
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Regular Meeting
2nd Floor Administrative Conference Room
Thursday, August 22, 1996 - 5:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Members Present: Cox, Greenleaf (5:45 P.M.), Hubbard, Martin, McMurray,
Singerman, Swaim, Traw
Members Absent: Spencer
Staff Present: Black, Clark, Craig, Daly, Eddqolt, Fisher, Green
CALL TO ORDER:
Traw called the meeting to order at 5:10 P.M.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
NONE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the regular meeting of July 25, 1995 were approved as written,
Swaim, Singerman.
UNTINISHED BUSINESS:
A. The City Coundl requested that the Trustees d~oose among several dates to
reschedule the joint meeting (formerly planned for September 4). Steve Arkins has
agreed to facilitate the joint meeting. The dates available to the coundl are Sept. 17
or.30, Oct. 1, 2, 23, or 29. A sheet was passed around and Trustees marlted the dates
they were available. The consensus was that an earlier date would be preferred.
Susan Craig explained that the Council ~vanted to use the September 4 date to
discuss long range planning and the downtmvn as a whole, so projects like the Library
would be part of a unified plan. Craig agreed to attend the meeting and report back
to the board.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
August 22, 1996
Page 2
AGENDA ITEM 3A
To prepare for the joint meeting, Craig and consultant David Smith are updating the
space needs study in anticipation of Council questions. Craig will distribute a draft
when it is available. She asked that comments and questions be directed to the
members of the Facilities Planning Committee: Steve Greenleaf, Charles Traw, and
Susan Craig.
In response to questions from a council member, a chart comparing the construction
costs of recently built library projects and a memo written by Craig will be sent to the
City Council. Craig was pleased to note that the projected ICPL construction costs
were comparable to the other libraries' costs in 1999 dollars.
Craig reported that the Planning Department has prepared a map of downtoxvn Iowa
City, with City owned land identified. Craig will ask Marian Karr, the City Clerk, to
poll the council members to see if they want more information.
B. Traw announced that this August 22 meeting was an historic event: for the
first time, the ICPL Library Board Meeting was televised live. This is in keeping
with one goal of the Library's long range ply, s~eking to increase public awareness
and to "report regularly to the public regarding library use, policies, and finances."
The August meeting was chosen because it is when the annual report is discussed.
NEW BUSINESS:
A. Craig gave each Trustee his or her own copy of the Annual Report. The
Library's annual report was erroneously not mailed with the board packet. Craig then
presented the highlights of the report, and asked that the board members take a look
at the report and bring any questions or comments to her. Copies of the annual
report will be available to the public at the Information Desk or in the Business
Office. Jesse Singerman led the congratulations from the board to the staff for a great
year.
B. James Hawtrey and Mary Merkel-Hess were reappointed to Library's Art
Advisory Committee, terms to expire April 1, 1999. Eugene Anderson was appointed
to fill a vacancy left by the death of Suzanne Richerson, term to expire April I, 1997.
Hubbard/Swaim.
As requested by the Ax~ Advisory Committee m~d Library staff, $600 was allocated
from gift funds to support the purchase of original art for the Art-to-Go collection.
Singerman/Martin.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Augast 22, 1996
Page 3
AGENDA ITEM 3 -\
Jim Ssvalm requested that the finalists for the Arts Purchase Prize contest be
displayed in the lobby as part of the Librarv's Centennial celebration.
STAFF REPORTS:
A. This year's Carol Spaziani Intellectual Freedom Festival will lddc off on
September 29, 1996, at 2:00 P.M. with an address by Elaine Estes, former director
of the Des Moines Public Library. Events that week will include a showing of
FAHRENHEIT 451, a film based on Ray Bradbury's book of the same title; a
booktalk featuring challenged and banned children's boolos; a luncheon with Judith
Krug of the ALA spealdng on INTERESTING TIMES OF INTELLECTUAL
FREEDOM; and the ~Exercise Your Right to Read-in. ~
The Intellectual Freedom Festival will be the first event in the Library's Centennial -
celebration. The Centennial Committee has prepared events to echo the 1896/97
time line. For example, the Library was dedicated on January 20, 1897. The
committee is planning a birthday party for the Library for January 19, 1997. Other
Centennial events include booktalks; a reade~r'~ performance of the melodrama
HONOR BEFORE WEALTH; a'fund drive in September; numerous special children's
programs; and the release of Lol]y Egger's book, a history of the Iowa City Public
Library.
B. Maeve Clark demonstrated General Reference Center, the Library's new Full
Text Magazine access. This service replaces the print and CD ROM versions of
periodical indexes, additionally providing abstracts and the text of artides. Clark is
excited about the scope and depth of the service. Because the service is on-line,
information can be accessed in a most timely manner. Clark demonstrated access to
an issue of TIME MAGAZINE which has not yet appeared on local newsstands. The
public will have access to magazines to which ICPL does not subscribe. General
Reference Center will also eliminate the frustration of looking up a magazine and
finding that the last person has removed the desired article.
General Reference Center can be found on RefNet, the Library's database access on
the first floor. The public w~ll be able to print copies of magazine and newspaper
articles through the Page Station for 10¢ per page.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
August 22, 1996
Page 4
AGENI)A ITEM 3A
Claris responded to questions about General Reference Center training by explaining
that it is more efficient to show a person ho~v to use General Reference Center xvhen
he or she has a specific question. The Information Department does offer XNorld
Wide Web search training twice a month, and Getting to Know the Library, a general
Imowledge course, twice a year. The Children's Department can give tours to school
age children upon request.
C. Craig briefly reviexved opportunities for continuing education for Trustees.
Trustees are invited to attend part or the entire Iowa I ibran, Assodation Annual
conference scheduled for October 10, 1 I, and 12. The theme this year is "The
Challenge of Change."
T, vo other workshops that might be of interest are BUILDING PUBLIC/SCHOOL
PARTNERSHIPS, September 5, sponsored by the Iowa Regional Library System, and
IOWA'S OPEN MEETINGS LAW, September 10, sponsored by the East Central
Regional Library. These two worlcshops are inexpensive and should prove to be
informative.
D. Larry Eckholt revealed a few changes that the Friends Foundation is maldng
this year. The annual report, with a new format, will be mailed in October instead of
August. The Silver Century Card will become the Second Century Card and will be
available to donors of $1 O0 or more. The county wide September issue of the
WINDOW will be inserted in the Ioxva City Press Citizen and the Johnson County
Advertiser, saving $3,000 in postage costs. Also, Development Office can nmv accept
donations by credit card.
The Development Office is working closely ~vith the Centennial Committee to
develop promotional items for the library Centennial. Some items already under~vay
are T-shirts, post cards, and book bags.
E. The State Library of Iowa has announced that the Iowa City Public Library has
met the conditions for State Accreditation, valid until June 1, 1999. This
achievement is important, because state funding may be tied to state accreditation in
the future.
F. As requested by Maeve Clark, Hospice Road Race Team Captain, up to $500
was allocated from the gift funds to support staff efforts to coordinate the Librarv's
Hospice Road Race team for this year. Martin/Cox.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
August 22, 1996
Page 5
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Last year, the funds xvere used to purchase special glasses and refreshments. Clark
invited to the Trustees to join the team ~x4th Library staff, friends, and volunteers and
put #521 on their pledge sheets.
G. The company that cleans the LibraL-v is undergoing reorganization. The local
Sen4ceMaster owner defaulted on his obligations and the franchise was taken over bv
the previous owner. Susan Craig and Ed Arensdoff are monitoring the situation and
are preparing to rebid the contract in the spring for FY98.
H. Office Manager Martha Lubaroff requested that any Trustee with an E-mail
address please give it to her so she has another contact point.
PRESIDENT'S REPORT:
A. Traw thanked the Board and Staff for their kindness after the death of his
mother. The thoughtfulness was much appreciated.
B. Traw announced that Phil Hubbard will b.e signing his new book, NEW
DAWNS, 150 YEARS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, on
September 29, in con}unction with the University of Io~va's Sesquicentermial
celebration. This is the same day as the kickoff for the ICPL's Intellectual Freedom
Festival, so Trustees are encouraged to get their copies early and attend the Library
event that day.
ANNOUNCEMENTS FROM MEMBERS:
NONE
COMMITFEE REPORTS:
NONE
COMMUNICATIONS:
The Chamber of Commerce newsletter, REFLECTIONS, recently contained a column
by former ICPL Trustee and current Chamber Chair, Tom Gelman. Gelman
supported the current board's role in planning the proposed Library expansion and
discussed the role of library boards in general.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
August 22, 1996
Page 6
FINANCIAL REPORTS:
AGEN'DA ITEM 3 A
A. Craig pointed out that the Library generated more income than ~vas pro}ected
for FY96; the amount is also up over the FY95 total.
B. FY96 receipts are in good shape.
C. Library expenditures for FY96 reached 100% of the budgeted amount. The
figures were slightly over due to last minute internal fund transfers. The Trustees
congratulated Craig on a job well done, and thanked her for her hard work.
D. The Library's Gifts and Bequests receipts and expenditures for the end of the
year were reviewed. The Gift fund greatly enhanced the Library's materials budget
this year. The balance is in good shape.
DISBURSEMENTS:
The Visa bill for July was reviewed.
The disbursements for July were'approved. Singre'man/Martin
AGENDA FOR SEPTEMBER MEETING:
The next meeting will be on September 26. The main item on the agenda ~adll be
preparing the FY98 budget. The Trustees considered holding a second meeting in
September, but will plan for a longer than usual regular meeting instead.
ADIOLrRNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 P.M. Singerman/Cox.
Minutes taken by Beth Daly
MINUTES
I0WA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
2ND FLOOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1996 5:00 P.M.
AGEndA ITEM 3A
Members Present:
Members Absent:
Staff Present:
Others Present:
Margaret Cox, Stephen Greenleaf, Philip
Hubbard, Mary McMurray, Mark Martin (left at
6:40 p.m.), Jesse Singerman, Anne Spencer
(left at 7:00 p.m.), Jim Swa±m
Chuck Traw
Barb Black, Maeve Clark, Susan Craig, Larry
Eckholt, Debb Green, Martha Lubaroff, Laura
Morton, Liz Nichols
Practicum students: Kathy Leonard, Amy
Sexton
C~T,L TO ORDER:
Cox called the meeting to order at
APPROVDT. OF MINUTES:
The minutes for the
approved as corrected.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
5:05 p.m.
regular meeting of August
Swaim/Mar t in
22, 1996 were
~F2~_~_USIN~.SS
A. FY98 Budget: Craig reviewed the budget process prior to
examining the packet included for the board. She reviewed the time
line leading up to approval of the budget. This first meeting is
the initial opportunity for the Board to see and hear about budget
requests. Priorities are established in keeping with the
strategic plan and with major building and computer systems
maintenance needs. The figures contained in the FY98 Budget in
Brief are preliminary since Craig has not yet received updated
projections from the City.
Proposals -
Circulation Coordinator. Craig explained that this proposal
appears twice in the packet due to a possibility the position could
be gained by reorganizing due to a current vacancy. This position
has been requested in our budget for the last three years. A
question was raised about the level of expertise we have in our
infoz'n~tion systems area and whether it is easier to fund a
technological staff person. In response to tha;- question, Nichols
explained that the Circulation Department, which is the largest
ICPL BOAP, D OF 5~RUSTEES
SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
PAGE 2
AGE~rDA iTEM 3A
department in the library, needs and deserves a full time manager.
We have a full t~_me systems librarian and the A~sistant Director is
directly in charge of both the Systems division and the Circulation
department. All Coordinators are librarians with M.L.S. degrees
which gives the position more flexibility. All Coordinators have
public service and .selection assignments in addition to their
management and supervisory responsibilities. Circulation needs
have been docLu~ented fully.
Craig then described the alternative proposal to keeping the
request in the budget for a 4th year. This suggestion is to change
a currently vacant, full time position to a management position.
The council would have to approve a request to turn that position
into one for a Circulation coordinator. It would cost the City
about $13,500 which is considerably less than the new position and
because the library cannot afford to lose all the clerical support;
we would fund a 25% clerical position, add it to a current 75%
position and fu~nd it from the library's reciprocal borrowing fund.
This is something we would do immediately while the job is open.
If Council accepted this proposal, the request for Circulation
Coordinator would be eliminated from the budget.
A more routine reclassification.wquld not be brought to the
Trustees. However, Craig believes this request is not routine
because it involves creating a management job and also requires a
co~itment of open access funding. q~ne Board asked a question about
the use of NOBU funds for the 25% position. Craig reviewed the
status of those funds ~nd its use as a contingency fund. She felt
certain that it would not be a problem.
Martin moved to approve the strategy as requested; that we go ahead
with the request as proposed and then include in FY98 budget
request if necessary. The motion was seconded by Spencer. All
were in favor.
proposal ~_Q_~WO more Sundays. Sunday hours are ver7 busy and
popular. The public frequently asks for more Sundays. This
proposal is to ens-ble the library to remain open Sundays through
June. This prompted a discussion on accessibility to the library
in tez~ns of additional parking. Trustees agreed with Craig's memo
outlining the high cost of a park and shop or bus pass arrangement
at a projected cost of $38,000 and/or a bookmobile which would cost
more than $100,000. Presently the most realistic method in which
to increase access is to be open on additional Sundays. Adding ten
more Sundays throughout the year is a hardship on the library since
the time and a half taken off by staff if they choose time of in
lieu of overtime usually comes from behind the scenes work. Martin
stated that his perception of increased access is the ability to
park rather than more hours. There is agreement that planning for
a larger building is a good reason to expand our hours to be open
on all Sundays. How far could we stretch our Sundays without
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
PAGE 3
AGENDA ITEM 3A
adding more staff? The Board directed Craig to include all summer
Sundays in the next budget draft.
Automatirig Cable channel. Black's request was for equipment to
reduce the need for manual loading of Library Channel programs.
Black based her request on the strategic plan goal of "fostering
the library's role as a community center" and taking the library's
services to those who cannot come to the library. The library
channel has been identified as one tool by which to do this.
Broadcasting programs with the new equipment will make use of
technology in a way that costs very little. Currently, every
program that goes on the channel is placed there manually which
means that at times programs don't get on exactly at scheduled
times and broadcasting can only take place when the library is
open. In response to a question, Black stated that it was
reasonable to expand library programming by eight hours a day with
this equipment. The Board favored th~s request.
Adult Program~: Black spoke about the next request which was for
regular budget support for adult programs. The strategic plan goal
of "providing services and programs that reflect and enrich the
community" needs funding in order to pay program expenses. The
ongoing success of the Intellectual. Freedom Festival is also
dependent on the ability'to bring in well known keynote speakers.
The community is rich in volunteers and we use many of them;
however, it is not always possible to locate individuals willing ~c
volunteer their time. She requested funding for two adult programs;
and the ongoing 'Let's Talk ~bout it" book talk series. Included
in this request as well are funds to handle some of the charges
incurred for copyright fees. Also included in this request is
funding to purchase programs for broadcast which would expand the
variety of offerings on the channel. Board members favored this
request.
P,h~Lldrens' programming. The initiatives for the prograr~,in9 come
out of the Strategic Plan. This proposal reflects a combination of
supplies, performers and printing necessal~ to carry out a busy and
ambitious agenda for children. Green reported that an average of
one program per day takes place. Expanding the number of Sundays
means more regular programming on Sundays. Board members favored
this request.
OCLC Online Cataloging Service. Morton spoke about this request
for funding the ongoing use of the OCLC cataloging database which
provides standard cataloging copy. Morton explained that the use
of this database allows library staff to catalogue more titles.
Once implemented, it will become part of our regular budget. Board
members agreed with this priority.
Replace Library'~ automated system
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
PAGE 4
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Nichols addressed the issue of replacing and upgrading the
library's computer system. This project would have been funded as
part of a building expansion referendum, but plans must now be made
to proceed. It is budgeted over two years. We will be approaching
the 5th year of our current configuration. We had to upgrade last
year and are presently at our maximum capacity. Up until now we
have been able to upgrade by getting a bigger central computer;
however, the technology has changed so that the PC now does more
work and offers more information and te~nLinals are being replaced
by computers . As a matter of fact, the type of system we have is
no longer being installed in libraries. Client-server hardware is
now being used. Nichols is convinced that a consultant would need
to be hired. When questioned about the budget line for consultant
which seemed low to Singerman, she stated the staff has the
expertise to write an RFP. The consultant is needed to evaluate
the proposals and the stability/financial position of companies
submitting a proposal. When a change ~n the building occurs, the
system could be moved and used easily; the only lost expense being
recabling.
Conl~uter Replacement Fund: The requested amounts for funding will
raise the amount in the replacement fund to reflect a more
realistic a~ount. It would bring the .fund to the point at which we
would not have to ask for'more each year. It will be used for the
first two years to fund a significant part of the automated system
replacement. The fund has been growing each year from a small
amount and if we can raise the annual afnount we should be able to
avoid budgeting significant additional money as we must now do for
the system replacement.
New Equipment and Software:
This request is for a variety of projects that reflect the
library's cof~u~tment to inforn~tion technology and making equipment
available in adequate numbers to support all formats effectively.
This request is limited to supporting small microcomputer-based
projects.
Buildin~ re~airs: This request is necessary to conduct building
repairs. An immediate need is for replacement of the roof and
carpet and upgrading the HVAC system. These repairs and
maintenance were deferred in anticipation of a bond referendum and
need to be completed to protect library staff, users and
collections as well. as the community investment to the current
facility.
Buildin~ Maintenance Increase. The contract for cleaning the
library has not been rebid in several years. We are currently
dealing with a new company due to legal problems with the former
franchise, and it is expected that the cost will increase by at
least 15%. Additionally, we are finding that general maintenance
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
PAGE 5
AGENDA ITEM 3A
and repairs to the building are increasing fairly dramatically as
the building ages.
Parking Fees: Craig included a memo to the Board describing the
projected costs and administration of a park and shop option. Her
recommendation is that it not be budgeted for in FY98 due to
significant cost, $38,000 and great difficulty to administer. The
City Council should be informed that the Board considered this
suggestion. Swaim recommended that we look into some sort of bus
pass to make available to patrons coming to the library in an
effort to increase our accessibility and bring riders for Transit.
Craig will look into it.
In response to a query from the Board, Craig calculated that
without any capital expenditures, this budget reflects a 7.2%
increase in budget request, using city figures from last spring.
B. Updated space needs report and discussion of "Downtown 21"~
With the exception of one error ~n.page S2 in the Space Needs
Assessment, the Trustees felt it represented the needs of the
library as well as originally; and that it answered the questions
about the advisability of a dow7%town location. Craig shared
comments and minor corrections from Karin Franklin and those
changes can be easily made as well. There was a discussion about
the responsibilities of the Trustees/Council and their meeting and
a Council Committee yet to be named to work on an overall downtown
plan. The trustees felt it was important to communicate to the
Council that the co~Littee not make an assumption about something
that involves the library. Our relation to this larger issue is
related to site.
Craig suggested adding a discussion item pertaining to how we see
the format of the meeting on the 30th, to the agenda for the
special meeting in October. Trustees believed that we needed to
revisit our basic principles and be prepared to go to the meeting
with those principles uppermost. Our basic concern is expansion of
the library, not the entire downtown.
STAFF REPORTS
~tennial Activities. Crai9 passed out information regarding
Intellectual Freedom Festival/Centennial Activities. The coming
weekend is the kick off of our celebration. Board members are
asked to attend as many activities as possible.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
PAGE 6
AGENDA ITEM 3A
University Heights Update. Residents responded to the survey
conducted by University Heights Council and stated that they would
want a contract. However, the amount they wanted to pay was quite
minimal. Currently discussion is at a standstill, but they may
consider something in a budget process. Our offer was in the
$15,000 range which seems high to them.
Hospice Road P~q~. Team 521 is the ICPL Hospice Road Race Team.
Pledge sheets were passed around as well as registration forms.
We'd like Trustees to be on the library team.
Development Office. Report is included in the packet and very
positive.
~able ~assthrou~h money. Black reported on a positive result of
cable franchise negotiations. A $.50 passthrough per subscriber
goes directly to the City and Broadbahd Teleco~unications System
held long discussions on how to use it. It was determined chat 1/2
should be used to hire a co~uunity progr~u,~er to help groups in
town use cable access. The other half could be used for equipment.
The Library received half of that half. Black reported that it was
a cooperative, productive meeting. The library will receive
$12,700 to purchase broadcast quality.cameras for the meeting room
to allow multi-ca~uera shoots, Black will serve on an interview
team while hiring the community progr~er. She was pleased with
all the support and recognition given to the library's needs.
Swaim ~ave credit to Black for her efforts.
Iowa Library A~sociation (ILA) conference is scheduled in Waterloo
October 11-12. Board members were told it is not too late to
register.
FYI. Special Library Centennial shirts were distributed to each
Board member. /%11 staff members will get one courtesy of corporate
gift support of the Centennial and an anonymous donor.
ANNOUNCEMENT FROM ~ERS
Swaim informed the Board about a national "Kids Vote" program.
Kids K-12 in I.C. schools will get to vote on election day at
their parents' precinct in a separate voting booth. He encouraged
library staff to sponsor a precinct and staff a booth on election
day. Votes are tallied and tabulated and released nationally as
part of this nationwide project.
Visa reviewed.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SEPTEMBER 26, 1996
PAGE 7
AGENDA ITEM 3A
Disbursements for August were approved. Greenleaf moved approval.
Cox seconded it. All in favor.
A special Board meeting was set for the 15th of October at 5:00
p.m. The agenda will include the budget and the upcoming
Trustees/Council meeDing on the 30th.
A~JOURNM~NT:
Greenleaf/Cox 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SPECIAL MEETING
2ND FLOOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 1996 - 5:00 PM
Members Present:
Margaret Cox, Stephen Greenleaf, Philip Hubbard, Mary McMurray, Mark
Martin, Jesse Singerman, Anne Spencer, Chuck Traw
Members Absent: Jim Swaim
Staff Present:
Barb Black, Susan Craig, Larry Eckholt, Debb Green, Martha Lubaroff,
Laura Morton
CAII TO ORDER:
President Traw called the meeting to order at 5:05 pm
The purpose of this special meeting was to cover two issues: FY98 budget and the joint
Council/Trustees meeting on the 30th of October,
FYg~ Budget
Craig reported that the version of the budget they had received was revised to include all the
Board's recommendations resulting after discussion at the September meeting. This version
included City's financial projections for FY98. The major increases from the last version were
the additional Sunday hours, a substantial request for $12,000 for painting and replacing wall
covers which was moved from capitol improvements to repairs and maintenance. This is the
Board's opportunity to look carefully at the budget that the,/suggested. If there are to be no
changes it will be entered into the City's system and be approved at the regular Board meeting
on October 24. . .
In answer to a question regarding how the new Circulation Coordinator position will affect our
budget, Craig responded that the City places the position into the personnel portion of our
budget and it is not reflected in the budget as it stands. The only expenses that the Board may
see as a result of this new position may be for office furniture.
There remains a level of concern among managers about the effect of being opened every
Sunday. The current contract allows staff to choose between overtime on Sundays and taking
time off and managers will have scheduling issues that mean time away from behind the scenes
work. We will have to wait and see what type of impact it has but staff supports the increase
in service.
Craig reported on the City Council meeting last week. She was there to answer questions
regarding the resolution to change a clerical position into a management position for Circulation
and increase a .75 clerical position to full time. This proposal was approved by the Board m
September. Craig was pleased at the outcome of the presentation. Council members asked
her interested, pertinent questions and voted 7-0 in favor of the resolution.
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OCTOBER 15, 1996
PAGE 2
COI. J~lCll/BC)ARD MFFTING, OCTOI~EB_3~
Traw asked for input from Board regarding the upcoming joint meeting. The Board felt that
David Smith, the building consultant, had proposed a meaningful agenda regarding the
discussion of options in his updated Building Needs Assessment. Traw asked for guidelines
from the Board to pass on to the facilitator. Traw hopes to meet with City Manager Arkins and
Mayor Novick prior to the meeting on the 30th to discuss direction and talk about a process.
Some concern was expressed by Board members that this meeting not get bogged down with
other agendas regarding downtown redevelopment; that this decision not be delayed as a result
of other possible projects. Singerman stated that the needs of the library cannot wait and we
must not get involved in a process that will slow us down. Trustees believe it is our goal to
get somethng to the public by next year. The community's need for a library cannot be
postpohed when the demand has been documented so well. Traw believes that Atkins will
begin with trying to get agreement on 1) do we need to expand and 2) should we remain
downtown7 Trustees would like to seriously talk about 641A, and hear from Council about
whether they think it will stand alone as a library or mixed use. The issue of a mixed use
facility has been raised with trustees however, no one has been clear about what use other
than library would be planned for. Trustees recognize the need to discuss concerns of Council
members like ease of accessibility, parking, etc. Board would want to hear from Council
regarding what concepts they feel are important in any expansion. It was suggested that Craig
offer a variety of times and invite Councilmembers f~3r a tour of the present building.
AD.I~L JRNMFNT:
Martin/Singerman at 6:05 pm
Minutes prepared and submitted by Martha Lubaroff.
MINUTES
IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
2ND FLOOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 24, 1996 - 5:00 PM
Members Present: Margaret Cox, Philip Hubbard, Mary McMurray, Anne Spencer, Chuck
Traw
Members Absent: Mark Martin, Jim Swaim, Jesse Singerman, Stephen Greenleaf
Staff Present:
Maeve Clark, Susan Craig, Larry Eckholt, Martha Lubaroff, Laura
Morton, Liz Nichols
CALl TO ORDEEJ:
President Traw called the meeting to order at 5:05 pm
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes for the regular meeting of September 26, 1996 were approved unanimously
after a motion by Cox which Hubbard seconded.
UNFINISHFD BUSINESS
Final approval of FY9P, budge~t. This is the third and final budget discussion prior to
submitting figures to the City. Craig pointed out significant increases for repair of roof.
replacement of carpet, and the beginning of a two year cycle of replacement of main
computer system. The budget reflects an anticipated increase in building maintenance.
The largest service increase is for funds to remain open on all Sundays. A smaller,
additional increase is for expanded adult and childrens programming. There was no further
discussion and a motion was made to approve the budget as submitted by Cox/Spencer.
It passed unanimously.
Craig reminded Board that she will meet with the City Manager in November to review the
budget request, it then goes to City Council for final proposal. It will be published in late
December.
October 30 Council/Board meeting
The board received a packet from the City Manager containing the updated space needs
assessment as well as miscellaneous pieces of information concerning the history of the
library project proposal. His agenda and guidelines for the structure of the meeting were
included. Traw plans to talk to Arkins prior to the meeting. He wants to convey to Atkins
the Board's commitment to move ahead and bring something to the voters by next year.
He also stressed the importance of adhering to the Manager's agenda before beginrang
to discuss other possibilities.
Documents were distributed from the Area Chamber of Commerc' ,~brary task force. The
task force presented it to the Chamber Board who approvP" ,t and forwarded it to us.
The substance of the proposal is to construct the libr~,y in lot 64 1A as part of a
multipurpose structure that would include an open performance plaza, underground
parking and the sale or lease of "air rights" for 3-5 additional floors for residential and/or
ICPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
October 24, 1996
PAGE 2
office development, A proposal to redevelop the library with components of other uses
as well as cutting back on meeting room space was included.
A second proposal was received from the CenterSpace Committee calling for a new
building on 641A which would comprise some combination of library and the elements of
CenterSpace like a large conference and performance auditorium. They envision the
current library building as housing community-based public access television service and
finally, a bridge between the two buildings.
Craig reported to the Board that she had sent a memo to all City Council members inviting
them to come to a tour of the library. She made herself available on several different
times and dates.
The meeting time was verified for 5 to 9 pm on the 30th of October,
STAFF REPORTS
Craig reminded Trustees of the Inservice Day letter included in packet. This is a third
annual staff development day scheduled for December 13 and Trustees are invited to
attend.
The Circulation Coordinator job search has begun. The position will be posted in one
national library journal, on the Internet, and various local and state recruiting venues.
Applications will be accepted until early December.
Johnson County Community Network. (JCCN) Craig reported that she was recently
elected Chair until June of next year. They have been established as a non-profit
organization. The kickoff is November 7 in ICPL Meeting Room. They are now searching
for an Administrator. This network which includes the cities of Iowa City, Coralville, IC
School District, University of Iowa, Chamber of Commerce, Johnson County, and ICPL is
working towards organizing and producing information pertinent to local and countywide
people and putting it on the World Wide Web. Their goal is to make this available for
smaller entities who do not have the resources to do it by themselves. They are an
information organizing, and producing group with the hope of helping smaller
organizations. The Trustees assist in the support of this network with funding from the
NOBU budget.
Development Office Report:
Eckholt displayed some items he is ordering for the Centennial; including a tee shirt for the
public, bookmarks, book bags, etc. They will be available at the Book Gala November 7
and be marketed from that time on. The Development Office recently sent out a large
fundraising mailing. It contains brochures with a history of private support as well as the
Annual report. The use of credit cards is now available for contributors.
Finance Policy Review:
This review was moved to November. Craig reminded the Board that at the last review.
the Board established a committee to review it. It is a policy of the Board that directly
tCPL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
October 24, 1996
PAGE 3
affects Board actions. Craig asked if trustees wanted to form a committee to review the
Finance Policy again prior to final review. Trustees asked Craig to present it to the Board;
they will evaluate the process.
The Newsweek article left out of the packet was distributed at meeting.
A corrected copy of IUPLA (Iowa Urban Public Libraries) statistics was passed out.
~BESJDI=NT'S RE:P~3RT
Traw reported earlier.
FINANCIAL REPORTS
Craig reported that both expenditures and receipts are where they should be for the first
quarter. Right at about 25%
Gift report. Craig reminded Board that much of the money in these accounts have been
allocated. The sum of money is not all available,
~UARTERLY REPORTS
Output Statistics
Always some interesting figures. This quarter circulation was up a bit and people coming
into the building was down a bit. Information statistics were up and the Compass remote
dial*in shows that more people are using our services electronically,
Circulation by Type & Format was reviewed.
DISBURSEMENTS
Visa reviewed. No discussion
Disbursements for September were approved unanimously, Cox/McMurray
Agenda items for Novera~
Finance, Theft and Use of Cardholders' File Policy Reviews
Discussion of Building
AdimJrnment
Meeting was adjourned at 6:05 pm after a motion by Cox/Spencer
Minutes taken and transcribed by Martha Lubaroff