Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-07-11 AgendaIOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 11, 1995 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC CENTER 410 EAST WASHINGTON ITEM NO. 1 - AGENDA IOWA CITY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - JULY 11, 1995 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS ITEM NO. 2 - CAL' TO O.DER. ROLL CALL, ~ CONSIDER ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR AS PRESi:NTED OR AMENDED. a. Minutes of Boards and Commissions, (1) Human Rights Commission meeting of February 27, 1998, (2) Human Rights Commission meeting of March 27, 1995. (3) Human Rights Commission meeting of April 24, 1995. (4) Human Rights Commission meeting of May 22, 1995. (5) Human Rights Commission meeting of June 26, 1995, (6) Board of Library Trustees meeting of June 22, 1995. (7) Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June 15, 1995, b, Setting Public Hearings. (1) CONSIDER SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 27, 1995. AT 7:30 A.M., TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR EIGHTEEN (18) REPLACEMENT UNITS OF PUBLIC HOUSING. Comment: Paragraph 403A.28, State Code of Iowa, requires this public hearing prior to undertaking this housing project. The Iowa City Housing Authority proposes to apply for eighteen (18) three-bedroom, single-family dwelling units pursuant to the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, for dwelling unit replacements for disposition of 18 units located at 192611946 Broadway Street subject to Section 18. Possible locations of replacement units and estimated costs will be discussed at said.hearing. c, Correspondence. (1) Letter from Mikki Webb regarding the East Loop bus route, (2) Letter from Irene Dyer, Kurt Dyer and Vickie Dyer Abrahamson regarding Sturgis Ferry Park compost/recycling site, Agenda Iowa City City Council Special Council Meeting July 11, 1995 Page 2 (3) Letter from Riqhard F. Houston regarding cable TV service. (4) Memoranda from the Traffic Engineer regarding: (a) Parking prohibition on Hickory Hill Trail at First Avenue, ..~-(b) P~roh(~ion on the cul-de-sac of Bluestem Court, APPLICATIONS FOR USE OF STREETS AND PUBLIC GROUNDS. (1) Application from the Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games to have the Olympic Torch Relay through Iowa City. (approved) (2) Application from Walter Sparks for the use of the northern portion of Jeffrey Street for a neighborhood barbecue on August 5, 1995. (approved) (3) Application from Jacki Brennan for the use of a portion of Foxana Drive on July 4, 1995, for a neighborhood picnic. (approved) e. APPLICATIONS FOR CITY PLAZA USE PERMITS. (1) Application from Billy Howell-Sinnard for permission to set up a table on July 1 and July 5-8, 1995, for the .purpose of distributing literature. (approved) (2) Application from Christopher Clark for permission to set up a table on July 8 and 15, 1995, for the purpose of distributing literature. (approved) (3) Application from Nita Kehoe for permission to set up a table on July 22 and 29, 1995, for the purpose of distributing literature and offering booklets for donations. (approved) (4) Application from the Council of Elders for permission to set up a table during the period of July 31 through August 4, 1995, for the purpose of selling raffle tickets. for a quilt. (approved) City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: REF: July 10, 1995 Mayor, City Council, General Public City Clerk Additions to Consent Calendar Correspondence. (5) Letter from Robert C. Carlson regarding the proposed location of the Science Center. 2. fo RESOLUTIONS. (1) Consider a resolution to issue a Cigarette Permit for Wig & Pen Pizza Pub, 1220 Hwy. 6 West. Agenda Iowa City City Council Special Council Meeting July 11, 1995 Page 3 ITEM NO. 3 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION {ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA). ITEM NO. 4 - · PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONGFELLOW AREA STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PROJECT. Comment: This project consists of the reconstruction of approximately 1,400 linear feet of sanitary sewer and 2,150 linear feet of storm sewer. The project also involves miscellaneous repairs to the sanitary sewer system. Total estimated cost of this project is 9496,117.00. Funding will be provided by General Obligation Bonds. Action: ~ ~ ITEM NO. 5- ITEM NO. 6 - CONSIDER RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONGFELLOW AREA STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PROJECT, ESTABLISHING AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY EACH BID, DIRECTING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS AT 10:30 A.M., AUGUST 1, 1995. Comment: See comment above. Action: /~/~. / f~ PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT. AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONGFELLOW AREA SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT. Comment: This project consists of root grinding and pressure grouting of 1,332 joints on 8" Vitrified clay sewer pipe. Total estimated cost of this project is 939,815.44. Funding will be provided by General Obligation Bonds. Action: #3 page ITEM NO. 3 - PUBLIC DISCUSSION (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA). Horow/ Public Discussion for items not on the agenda. At this time we ask council to please step forward, sign in, state your name and keep your comments to more than five minutes please on items other than what are on the agenda this evening. Ed Barker/ I hope that this will be the last time and I am sure that you will agree with me because I will address you on the topic of water and wastewater issue. I would like to start this evening by quoting from a book by Senator-the late Senator William Fulbright, "To criticize ones-the word country appears in this statement, substitute in your minds the word city. To criticize ones country is to do it a service and pay it a compliment. It is a service because it may spur the country to do better than it is doing. It is a compliment because it evidences that the country can do better than it is doing. In a democracy dissent is an act of faith." All we have been attempting to do since November is to spur the city to do better. I think you have and I commend you for it. It seems to me that you are now at the point where decisions will be made reasonably soon. Much progress has been made since last November. However, you must evaluate the proposals carefully and ask the right questions. All proposals no matter from where they come must stand the most careful scrutiny. I appreciate very much having had the opportunity to participate in the decision making process but realize fully that the actual decision is your responsibility. I wish you well as you proceed to make the decisions that will be in the best interests of the citizens of Iowa City. Horow/ Thank you, Ed. Anyone else care to address council? Doug Allaire/ Hi. I am the Chair of the Board of Directors of PATV and about ten days ago there was a program on that some people thought was inappropriate or at least in appropriately timed and there has been a lot of discussion about that and I wanted to address council about it. I talked to each of you and went over the basics of PATV's responsibilities for programming. Basically the way the guidelines of PATV are written, the way the contract with the city and the cable company is written and federal law and something else but I forget right now, we don't have any control over content. To the extent that we can't, until the most recent federal legislation, we could not regulate time of presentation of material. And so that puts us in an awkward position because when something comes on that is deemed inappropriate by a large number of people we are Thisrepresents only areasonably accuratetranscription ofthelowa City council meeting ofJuly11,1995, F071195 #3 page 2 expected to have some control over this. Our basic rule is that the producers are the providers of the programming are in control of the content of the program. We have-There are two classes of people, producers and providers. I just wanted to mention that because producers make their own programs with the PATV equipment, they are trained in the operation of the equipment and they take workshops in that and also a workshop called Guidelines which deals with the philosophy and the history and the meaning of access and the purposes of access. Providers are people who give us tapes to put on. So, like the Tom Harkin Show is one, The Power Connection, there are several. The Senior Center T.V. Mature Focus, things like that. These are provided, just given to us and we play them. We have come up-The Board met informally last Friday and we came up with some ideas to be presented at our formal meeting on the 20th of July. The basic idea is that we want to make sure that our users are aware of their responsibilities that they are taking on when they put a program on. Well, there are several steps proposed. One would be to require producers and providers to identify themselves in their program. That has never been a requirement. Producers generally do it. We like to see out names in the credits. Providers are bringing in something from outside and so we just haven't had them identify themselves. But this is something we are going to discuss. Another one is to identify producers and providers to callers. When people have a question about a program currently the informal policy has been to take the name of the caller and give that to the producer or provider and they would get in touch with the caller. That came up when a controversial religious program was on and there was a lot of phone calls coming in and the staff just asked the provider what he wanted to do and he thought that was a good thing and that was the way it was. I am not sure what the policy was before PATV started when the cable company operated access. I don't have any idea but it might have been that for all I know. And it has worked for 15 years. But the feeling is that someone who is addressing the public should be willing to be addressed by the public and so that is another step that we are going to discuss. A third one is to encourage or to develop a series program guide so that programs that are in the series rotation will have a brief description written about them by the producer or provider and that would be available at the public library or PATV or wherever and that gives people an idea of what the content is and so on before they are faced with it. And the last one is to encourage producers and providers awareness of their relationship with their audience and as I said, the producers take several workshops with whatever This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 #3 page 3 equipment they are going to use they are trained in that and also in the guidelines. The providers have not had to take any workshops. And the feeling among the boardmembers Friday night was that it might be a bad idea to have providers also take the guidelines workshop. They don't need to take the equipment workshop because they are not interested in that. But the guidelines would give them a little more background then they might absorb by being at PATV and we think that might be helpful. So we are going to discuss these at the July 20th Board meeting. It is Thursday, a week from Thursday at the Iowa City Public Library and on Friday, this Friday the 14th, at 5:00 PM at the PATV Studio there is going to be a program called Open Channel. I have talked to all of you about that. And we are going to discuss this issue. The discussion will actually begin probably about 10-15 minutes after 5:00 because somebody else signed up before i did. So, that is the way it goes. And through all of this stuff we have had, and I am sure you are aware, several complaints called in and so on. Some of them anonymous threatening types of things. And that happens to PATV when this sort of problem comes up and sometimes for other things and the staff just takes it as part of their job. But we have also gotten a lot of support and among the council as well. But meeting on the street, people calling up to support us. So, are there any questions. We have several board members and producers - Woito/ I would like to clarify something. Doug, you started out saying we can't do anything about content. That is not entirely true. You can do something about obscenity which is illegal and I want to make sure that everyone understands that. Allaire/ We have dealt with that and we wonder what we can do. Can we take postpone- Woito/ You need to ask Jim Larew for specific advice. I mean Anne Burnside and I can give you some guidelines but we are not your attorney. I just want to make sure that the council understands that there is something you can do about obscenity and so your statement about you can't do anything about content is not true under constitutional law or state law. Allairs/ Yeah, we have to define obscenity and we also- Woito/ That is the County Attorney's job. Allaire/ But can he act on something that has not been published? Thisrepresents only areasonablyaccuratetranscriptlon ofthelowaCitycouncil meeting of July11,1995. F071195 #3 page 4 Woito/ You talk to your attorney about that. I am talking about pre-publication censorship and I am not going to get into that with you because you are not my client. Horow/ Maybe Mr. Larew should be there on Friday. Woito/ Yes, he should. Horow/ Does anybody have any specific questions? Nov/ I would like to also ask if you can't control the time of day that a show is going to be viewed it seems to me that a commercial station can say we are not going to show this after X hours or before X hours- Kubby/ I thought that has been determined. That if it is obscene they have some control and if it is not obscene they can even control the time of day. I thought that was fairly clearly from what we have been told. Nov/ If it is obscene they can say no. If it is questionable, if it is somewhat offensive I think they can say we will do it at this time. So I want them to ask, that is all. Allaire/ And in thinking about this it always comes down to whether it is timing or show it at all, who is the judge and if the producer insists what happens then? Nov/ Then the Board has to make a decision. Woito/ It is all in your lap, frankly. Throg/ The policy is certainly in their lap and certainly (can't hear). Woito/ Yes and the liability is in your lap. Either way, either way it goes. Nov/ And I think you have to ask also how much of this decision making is a staff function and how much is a board function. Horow/ Okay. Thank you very much unless anyone else has anything? Pigott/ I think that Naomi's- Doug and I have talked via e-mail and other ways about some of this. One of the things I think people had questions about well, what policies does PATV have in regard to when shows are going to be shown and the response Thlsrepresontsonly oro~on~ly accurate ~$crtp~on ofthelowa Cl~ council meetlngofJuly11,1995. F071195 #3 page 5 that I got from you guys was that we feel that we cannot regulate when the shows are shown for constitutional reasons and even suggesting that it be shown after a certain hour may cause trouble for PATV in terms of constitutionality and the idea of having Jim is probably a good idea. Allaire/ And even that is up in the air now because there is a new cable law and there is another new one I think. So, it is all up in the air. Kubby~ And the bottom line is the Board of PATV is in charge of making these policies and figuring this out and I trust you to do your job. Baker/ I agree and I don't want us to get into a discussion about obscenity and pornography and smut because I don't think any of us could agree. But I think that we all agree that there is something wrong with that programming and at that time at night. Kubby/ Do you think (can't hear). Baker/ I don't know. I am just setting up the situation because from what you have told me I empathize with you entirely. What you haven't said is next week if somebody else would walk in with a comparable or more graphic picture, they could do the same thing. Allaire/ If we set up all sorts of assurances and everything else, somebody will find something else. There is always another-it is like half way there. You never quite- Throg/ I guess I want to react a little bit to what I understand the personal producer's or provider's responsibility is here and if I am mistaken in what I say please tell me. But I understand that the guidelines, PATV's guidelines, clearly indicate that none of its programs may contain material which is obscene as defined by federal law. That is one thing. Secondly that each producer must display a disclaimer that says PATV is not responsible for the program content. And thirdly that the producer assumes full responsibility for content. It seems to me that places a burden on the producer and if there are problems with obscenity that producer is the person that has to bear the responsibility of having shown something that is obscene and that is to be decided by the county attorney or through the courts. That is the way I understand it. Thisrepresents only ereesonably accurate benscrlptlon ofthelowa City council meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 ~3 page 6 Woito/ Reading the matter strictly, yes. As a practical matter there is a college student who is producing, does not have a deep pocket, does not have insurance, and PATV does. Throg/ I don't know but we are talking responsibility not necessarily paying money. Woito/ Well, in terms of consequences, there may be greater consequences that you can bring to bear against PATV than a single producer. But you are right, in terms of criminal context, you are probably going against the producer the most. Horow/ Okay, folks, we are going to have to move Oho Baker/ Wait a minute. We still seem to throw up our hands and say there is nothing we can do. Allaire/ Well, what we are going to try to do is train our people so that they will be aware. If they choose then to fly in the face of convention and get people mad, I am not quite sure what we can do. There have been legal cases where access was denied and producers sue and producers win. Woito/ I don't thinkwe are talking about denying access or none of you rare considering- Horow/ It is the appropriateness of timing. Allaire/ We are going to try to work on that and we will keep you apprised. Horow/ Okay. Woito/ There is your attorney right here. Good timing, Jim. Horow/ Thank you very much. Is there anyone else who wished to address council? I would remind you of five minute time. Ben Kemp/ My daughter's name is Christina Marie Kemp and I am standing here in front of you once again asking for-The law has been broke and you said that you would send a letter to me to address who it should go to. Letters have been sent all over the world to Senators, Governors, President of the United States. Why has the judge locked up this case so tight that the newspapers, KCJJ can't even get in there? I want these people to fight me because they are-they have broke the law. The two I told you last time and I want something done. Mayor This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City council meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 #3 page 7 you gave a oath to uphold the law in this town. Do your job, please. This is my little girl we are talking about. My blood, my roots. Horow/ We have already dealt with this as far as we, as a governing body, can go. Ben, we are not a judicial court. We have asked out legal office to assist you. What has happened with sending a letter to them? Except that I am not sure whether whatever we could do- Woito/ Anne can report. Throg/ It would help for us to find out what (can't hear). Horow/ Okay, Anne- Mrs. we can have Mrs. that° Burnside would you please come forward and Burnside explain this. I would appreciate Anne Burnside/ I know that Sara Holecek from our office and Heather Shank from the Human Rights Commission both sat down with the gentleman in our office and gathered the facts and the history of his case and it was their opinion that there was nothing within our jurisdiction as a city that we could do. It is a matter within the court system and it is not something that we can act on. Throg/ So what is the busiest place for Ben to go to? I mean who should he go to? Burnside/ My understanding, second hand from speaking with Ms. Holecek, is that the matter has already been through the appellate court system of the state and that there is a final ruling. I don't know that there is any court review available left to him on the issue. Horow/ So this is something that he would have to have a lawyer figure out how to do that. Is that right? Ben Kemp/ I have asked every attorney in this town. They do not want to take this case. They fear this case. Horow/ There isn't anything that we can do at this point. We have gone as far as we can go. Kemp/ Her right has been violated. My civil rights have been violated through channels who I know come to the U.S Marshall that yes, her rights have been violated as mine and there is Thisrepresents only areasonably accuratetranscription ofthelowa Citycouncil moetingofJuly 11,1995. F071195 #3 page 8 a lot of damage that could be done. But see, again, I am not the one that broke the law. They, too, are the ones that did it. They are the ones that brought shame that is going bring shame to their families. Not I. Horow/ I think we agree with you. We agree with you and your agony over this but there is nothing that this group can do for you. We have gone as far as we can go. Kemp/ I guess the next thing I do is just-they kidnapped her so I am just going to go back and get her. If it ends my life like I told them almost five years ago, I will die for her just like died for us to live here in this country. Thank you. Horow/ Anyone else care to address council on any issue that is not on the agenda? Derrick Honore/ I am a board member with PATV and I would just like to address the council and ask that there is an understanding as we go through dilemma that access is very necessary and that access is important to me as an African American. I have done a few shows and the response that I get from the public is that this is very necessary procedure and it is something that is needed in order to allow the public to enforce their opinions. Now sometimes things get a little mixed up but as a board member I am here to assure you that we will find a way to straighten this thing out and try to avoid any other conflicts. Horow/ I want you to realize this council continues to send letters to absolutely every single Congressperson we can think of for supporting this and we so use the value of public access when we are writing these letters. So, you have our support in this. We want your support in helping this community be comfortable with access. I think that is our question. Derrick/ Thank you very much. And I would like to take this opportunity to ask anybody that wants to come and voice their opinion, we will have Open Channel this Friday at 5:00 and let's try to air this thing out. We do want input from the public. Horow/ That is also via phone, isn't it? Derrick/ Yes it is. Thlsrepr~ents only a ~on~bty accur~etr~s~pUonofthelowaCItycouncllmee~ngofJuly11,1995. F071195 I' #3 page 9 Horow/ Do you have the phone number? Derrick/ 338.-8456. Horow/ 338-8456 and that is between 5:10 and 6:00 on Friday. Renee Paine/ It may go a little longer. We have set aside more time. Kubby/ Although I guess I do want to say that I don't think that your role as a board member is to make people comfortable. Sometimes the role of people producing things on Public Access is to make people uncomfortable to spur thought an discussion. I agree with everything except that one thing. Horow/ We always have to disagree on something. Thank you for your support. / I do believe that is what Public Access does in so many different ways. Thanks very much. Horow/ Anyone else care to address council? Tim Barrett/ I know you folks have a lot of business to attend tonight so I don't want to take too much of your time. This is in regard to PATV. I do not subscribe to cable and I don't watch PATV. I am a fledgling producer and about 3-4 weeks ago friends and colleagues of mine told me I should go down to PATV to investigate producing a program related to the Indian Hand Papermaking. And I just want you all to know that it was made very clear to me during the Guidelines meeting that I was responsible for whatever I produced and I assumed at the time that meant I was to put my name on it and stand by it and I know there has been some discussion about whether or not that should be enforced. I feel very strongly that whether you are a producer or a provider you should put your name on whatever goes on the air and you should be willing to stand by it. They also made it very clear to me that there would be many people in that facility working on programs that express very diverse viewpoints and if we were going to work there we needed to respect those other viewpoints and it was pretty clear that I was going to be in an editing room and there were going to be other people across the aisle from me working on programs that I might like at all but that is what that facility is about and that impressed me very much as well. The other thing that has been very very clear to me is these people are very serious about access. It is like a glowing on the wall, This represents only a reasonably accurate trensc~¥tlon of the Iowa City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 page 10 it flashes on and off. They are not fooling around. They make a very complicated set of hardware and procedures as accessible and unintimidating as possible and I think they do a fine job of it and it is a wonderful public forum in this community and I am not suggesting in anyway that we don't have responsibilities to each other in terms of the kinds of things that go on over the air. But I have been amazed everyday that I have gone in there. I think it is a wonderful thing. Horow/ Thank you. Anyone else care to address council on any issue that is not on the agenda? Okay. This represents only a reasonably accurate trenscrlption of the Iowa City council meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 ~4 page 1 ITEM NO. 4 - PUBLIC HEARING ON PL/%NS, SPECIFICATIONS~ FORM OF CONTRACT, ~NDESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONQFELLOW A~EA STORM AND S~NITARY 8E~.~ PROJECT. Horow/ Declare the p.h. open. I would ask you to limit your comments to five minutes. Please state your name and sign in. Allen J. Wolfe/ I own the property at the corner of Oakland and Grant Court along with my sister Margaret Wolf. And I also own the property individually at 1210 Grant Court. I was born in 430 Oakland Avenue back in 1922 and for 40 years we didn't have any water until Court Hill was developed and from then on we got it. I am certainly in favor of what they want to do but I am very concerned about dumping the water into Ralston Creek. That they are doing there. I have talked to John Huss about it and he assures me that there isn't going to be any problem, but at the present time we own the building across the street from New Pioneer and three weeks ago I guess it was on the Sunday when the big water came real fast, it came within a foot of the door and fairly close around here. We can't handle it. The water that's going to come out of there is going to come right now and into the creek. At the present time, we're storing about half of this water in basements, I mean , and it goes out very slowly. And he knows too that we've got a mess over there and that they've got storm sewer running into sanitary sewer now and then when they separate this, that's all going to go to the creek and it's going to go right now. In high water times, Ralston Creek cannot handle that. There's obviously more storm water apparently then right in this area. I'm not an engineer but I've been in that area for a long time and I know there's a lot of water and that I know that it's going to come right now and that in high water times the creek can't handle it. Thank you. Horow/ I want to ask Mr. Fosse if he would be able to address your comment, Mr. Wolfe. I mean it's a genuine concern. Fosse/ There's really no options for sending that water anywhere but Ralston Creek since it does flow down hill and it's either continue to run it through the sanitary sewer as it's been doing and storage in the basement as he suggested or discharge it into the creek. I don't expect that we'll see a difference in the flood peak downstream here. If you wish we could do a hydrograph analysis to find out if the peak off of this water shed will precede the peak that we get from up stream, that is if it aligns with the peak from up steam, the we can see a This rep;esents only 8 ;eason~b~y accuratstranscrlp~on of ~elowa City council mee~,g of July 11. 1995. F071195 #4 page 2 slight increase, although when you look at the entire water. it will be quite small. If the peak from this water shed precedes the up stream peak, then the peak here will not change. Kubby/ So when water comes up the sanitary sewer on their property, it means that it's sewer in basements. Fosse/ Yes. Kubby/ Versus water in basements. Fosse/ Right. Kubby/ And with this, if there is water in basements from the storm, it will be storm water versus sewage. Fosse/ Yeah. If it comes in through the walls and not from the floor, then that'll be storm water. Kubby/ But now the only choice really. Fosse/ I think they're getting a mix of all. If it comes out of the floor it's certainly sewage diluted with storm water, but it's still nasty. Horow/ Thank you very much. Anyone else care to address this issue? This is the Longfellow Area Storm and Sanitary Sewer Project. Glad to see you. Helen Marlas/ Well I hope so. I live at 752 Oakland at the corner of Sheridan in Longfellow Sewer project area. My family has been affected by this as I guess Mr. Wolfe's has by some forty years. Every few years there are sewer back ups and I'm delighted that the city council is finally addressing this problem and I hope we'll get some relief from this very serious problem and health hazard. I heard the Shive-Hattery presentation of this on the 30th of March. And at that time I raised a question which as far as I know has not been answered yet. And I discussed it with the city engineer yesterday afternoon and he suggested that I call Mr. Huss and I did but I didn't get a return call It was later in the afternoon. I really would like to have some clarification of what I consider a little problem here. From my point of view there may not be one but it doesn't make any sense as it's presented to me. I have no problem with what is being done from Clark to Dearborn or whatever and Court and so on at the north end of Thisrepresents only areasonably accurate transcription oftbelows City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 #4 page 3 this project. Or at the North end of Oakland Avenue. Oakland Avenue is about three blocks long. It's a short street with irregular intersections. Let's call it three blocks long. Two blocks of this three block area are affected by sewer back ups. Well two and part of the block in between. Two houses of that block. On the 30th of March, at the presentation, it was pointed out that sewers back up at the low points of the sewer systemwhere if somehow or other there's some kind of blockage and where it's not possible anyway for the sewer system to handle the flow of sewage. And I thought that over at that meeting and I thought then how is it possible for our block of Oakland which is from Sheridan to Center Street to have sewage backing up into every house which has happened over four years. Some houses are built in things, but it's a problem for that whole block. Well then the next block north toward Center Court has no sewer problems from Center up to the second house from the corner of Grant Court. Kubby/ And that's a lower point, you're saying? Marlas/ That is the lowest point as I see it. Yes. So how do you explain between our block which has it and those two houses by Grant Court, there aren't sewer backups. And if what they are doing at that north end of this whole area is going to correct the problem, I don't see how it's going to correct it for our block of Oakland Avenue. Kubby/ If that's the theory behind the work. Marlas/ That's the theory behind the work. And one part of the problem the whole year has been that there were no storm drains evidently on Clark Street so that rain water somehow or other was connected through the sanitary sewer system of Oakland Avenue. And so then they're going to correct that evidently by putting some kind of a line under the field behind Longfellow school over to Oakland Avenue and then down to Grant Court and they're going to get it to the creek for storm water and I guess over toward Court Street for the sanitary sewer. But if that is the problem and the solution over there, how do account for the fact that that water, if it's supposed to take care of the whole area, how do you account for the fact that that sewage water does not go into the houses between those two houses at Grant Court and the next block, 700 block of Oakland Avenue. And the only thing evidsntly that they're going to do for our 700 block of about seven houses is that they're going to do very long neglected maintenance of the joints between the sections of the sewer Thisrepresents only areasonably accurate ffans~Iptlon ofthelowa CIty coundl mea~ng of July 11, 1995. F071195 #4 pag~ 4 pipe under Oakland Avenue. Now one cannot- now these sewer pipes are under the pavement of the street and we have been getting between two and three feet of water and in 1993 we had about five back ups. The first one about a foot. The other four two and three feet which caused a lot of damage. Now that volume of water could not have entered through the joints of those sewer pipes. I mean if there were that much water under the street around the sewer pipes, the street would be sinking. The sidewalks would be sinking. And so my concern is, is whatever is proposed at the present time going to correct our problem. Horow/ I think the best thing that we can do is ask when Mr. Fosse gets the answer to you, that he gets an answer to us because the question is a good one. Marlas/ Well I'm glad you think so. I didn't get it on the 30th of March and I really would like to have this corrected because this is a very serious. Horow/ Would you like to comment or would you just like to wait and get the answer to us? Fosse/ John's here to answer. The meeting on the 30th was a pre- design meeting and this is precisely why we have those meetings so that Helen and others can identify where the problems are. Since then John Hues from Shive-Hattery is here this evening, has been working on a solution to that problem and others and I'll let him address it since he did the analysis. Horow/ Mr. Hues, it's all yours. John Hues/ Shive-Hattery. First of all, I do want to assure you that I did try to call you back at 5:00 this evening but I didn't get an answer. I guess you'd already left for home. Marlas/ Well, I had something to do. I went out to look at land. Hues/ The project that we're speaking about tonight was envisioned by a long study that was done about a year ago. And that study did include a hydrolic analysis of the sewer system within the entire neighborhood. The water problems that are experienced, the surcharging, the back ups, the sanitary sewers, were caused basically by clean water getting into the sanitary sewer that has come from a number of sources that have been identified. They've included roof drains, drive area drains, Thlsrepr.ent$oniy are.ondotyaccurato ~an$crlp~on of ~elowa Ci~ coun~lmeetlng of July11,1995. F071195 #4 page 5 storm sewer cross connections. A large part of it has come simply from the infiltration at normal joint intervals, and sanitary sewers, and it is also caused by the number of sewer lines that are downstream of this area that are significantly under capacity. To think about a size, most of the sanitary sewers in this area are about an eight inch diameter. The storm sewer that we're putting in this area is thirty-six inch in diameter. So we're talking about storm sewers that have the capacity of over 100 times what's in the sanitary sewer. If you think about a roof drain off a home, you're typical gutter downspout is about a four inch pipe. It takes one gutter to fill up a sanitary sewer over half way. So it doesn't take a whole lot of clean water to create surcharging. What occurs with sanitary sewers is that basically it flows by gravity. It looks for a place where the flow can get out by relief. This particular home's at the NE corner of Sheridan. The house actually sits a little bit lower than the homes directly to the north. The tap, the Y from her home is in fine shape from the TV reports. There is a tap or a Y, a connection from the house just downstream from us. It's protruding about two inohes into the main sewer pipe. That's one of the repairs that's going to be made by this project. The other things that should dramatically. The problems experienced at this location is that we're drastically increasing the sanitary sewer capacity downstream. We're increasing the size from an eight inch line into a fifteen inch in one section, an eight inch to a twelve in another section. We're getting rid of a lot of clean water sources. ~nd by that, we're taking lawns that over 50% of the joints are showing active infiltration meaning groundwater's getting into the sewer line at over 50% of the joints in the pipes. And we're going to be able to correct that. We're going to repair places where we have broken Y's and by the one just down stream or from this home which basically it obstructs the flow from being able to get through the pipe and causes a backup. Some of the other things that many of her neighbors have done is put back flow preventers on their service lines. There's not one on this home. Back flow preventers are not fool proof. They clog. Toilet paper, other things tend to make them so they won't close all the way and they're a maintenance hassle. They're a pain. But they sometimes can help. It's our belief that we're adding additional capacity to remove surcharging in the line. We're getting rid of what we feel is the most the amount of storm water that can effectively or efficiently be pulled out of the sewer lines and even with the very high standard that the city uses for infiltration into the sewer lines, we're providing that level of capacity at this location. We don't feel that Thlsrepresents only a reasonably accurate transcription ofthalowa City council meeting ~ July 11, 1995. F071195 #4 page 6 there should be continuing surcharging at this home or other homes within this district once the project is complete. Horow/ Mr. Huss, can you address her question of why the home of the lower part of the street are not experiencing this flooding where hers are? Huss/ Well~ there are several reasons or I believe there are several reasons. One is between her home and a number of these other homes we have a Y that is protruding several inches into the main. This obstruction causes additional backing up of the flow in her section of line that is not experienced downstream. It acts as a regulator. It prevents flow from getting past it and on down. The second thing is a number of these homes do have backflow preventers that have been added to their service lines. I don't know if all of them do. I have not made personal inspections at the homes. And the last thing is her home actually does sit just a little bit lower than the homes immediately downstream. As you go further north the sewer main does get deeper. So, what occurs is you have what is called a hydrolic profile in the sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewers backup at points the flow can't get through the pipe and the Y that is protruding just downstream of her home is one of those points. So to a certain extent it forces a regulation of the flow pass her home to the points down stream. Are there guarantees? No, from an engineering standpoint we are fairly confident that we will solve this problem and the others in the area. Horow/ Does anyone else have any other questions to Mr. Huss? Karen Gerald Wheaton/ (Can't hear). Horow/ Would you please come to the microphone and sign in and tell us your name please. ~neaton/ I have friends on Oakland and I live in the neighborhood and it is just the most horrible mess. It just makes you cry, really. And I just wonder, based on what the other woman said about the three blocks or two blocks of really bad stuff and that there is this one block that seems okay and then when you get to Grant Court and over on the west side of Oakland there are a couple of houses that really get it bad and I just hope that they know exactly why. Those two houses, and I wonder why those two houses get it so bad. I mean I know that this one woman gets like four feet of water, four feet of sewage every time it storms. But the two-I don't know exactly why. He was This represents only areasonM}ly oc~rstotrans~lptlon ofthelowe CIw council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 #4 page 7 saying the north end of the street was better but they live in the north end of the street. I don't really quite understand. Huss/ I am sorry. There is a section of Oakland in the middle that do not seem to get the surcharge. When you get up to the intersection at Clark-Grant Court there are a number of houses there that get surcharging very badly and the house I think you are referring to is at the northwest corner, kind of at the T where Grant Court and Oakland intersect. CHANGE TAPE TO REEL 95-82 SIDE 1 Huss/ -rid of a lot of clean water cross connections. Horow/ Does anyone else care to address council in the p.h. specifically on the Longfellow area storm and sanitary sewer project? Okay. Declare the p.h. closed. Thtsrepr~entson~ are~o~ablyaccura~ ~ms~lp~on oftbelow. CIty coundl meet~g of July 11,1995, F071195 Iowa City City Council Special Council Meeting July 11, 1995 Page 4 ITEM NO. 7 - ITEM NO, 8 - ITEM NO. 9 - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONGFELLOW AREA SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT, ESTASLISHING AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY EACH BID, DIRECTING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS AT 10:30 A.M., AUGUST 1, 1995. Comment: See comment above, PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FAIRVIEW AVENUE/HIGH STREET STORM SEWER PROJECT. Comment: This project involves construction of storm sewer improve- ments in the area between High Street and Fairview Avenue. The improvements are designed to reduce storm water flooding and associated property damage. The preliminary estimated cost of construction is 5~,000. Funding for this project is from General Obligation Bonds. Action: CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FAIRVIEW AVENUE/HIGH STREET STORM SEWER PROJECT, ESTABLISHING AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY EACH BID, DIRECTING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS AT 10:30 A.M,, AUGUST 1, 1995. Comment: See comment above. #7 page ITEM NO. 7 - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANSt SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, ~ ESTIMATE OF COST FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONGFELLOW A~EA SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT, ESTABLISHING AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY EACH BID, DIRECTING CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH ADVERTISEMENT FOR EIDSt AND FIXING TIME~ND PLACE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS AT 10=50 A.M., AUGUST 1, 1995. Horow/ Moved by Pigott, seconded by Baker. Any discussion? Kubby/ Just a reminder about how important city services are. Water and sewer are some of those basic things that most cities in this country deal with and I think the Longfellow neighborhood has more than enough appreciation for when it is going to work well. Throg/ Is this getting paid for by CDBG funds? No- What is the source of funds? Atkins/ General obligation- Horow/ Okay. Any other discussion? Roll call- (Yes). Resolution is adopted. Thisrepresents onl~ areasonably accuratetranscription ofthelowa Citycouncil meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 #8 page i ITEM NO. 8 - PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS~ SPECIFICATIONSt FORM OF CONTRACTt AND ESTIMATE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FAIRVIEW AVENUE/HIGH STREET STORM SEWER PROJECT. Horow/ Declare the p.h. open. I would ask you to address council, sign in and state your name and keep your comments to five minutes. This cost has been revised since the initial preliminary assessment. David Fitzgerald/ I live on the corner of College Street and Ralston Creek, just downstream from where this project is happening and going to occur and I think it is really appropriate that the city be addressing some of the problems that my neighbors have had and I don't suggest that I don't want their problems solved. I am concerned, however, of it being further downstream and I just hope that people who have the training and know-how that they are not transferring that problem downstream so that then in two years I will be here. Over the last ten years there have been several thousands of dollars to try and reinforce the erosion problem on the bank and I have been reassured repeatedly that the city has in no way any obligation or any way of helping me do that. So I have done that over the years and I certainly hope this project doesn't cause a problem for me or other people on downstream. I certainly hope it solves the problem. Horow/ Thank you very much. Mr. Fosse, could you assure, refute- Fosse/ It is basically the same explanation as 400 yards upstream which we were talking about five minutes ago. It is the same situation. There will be probably some incrementally increase in the flows. Again, we can do that hydrograph analysis to see if they align or not. I think the question is is balancing out the flow. We don't have any options here. If we can't store upstream then it needs to go into the creek. Horow/ May I ask something? If the city did this, would this be of any assistance to their insurance policies should this sort of thing happen in the future? Fosse/ I am sorry, I didn't follow that. Horow/ If we do the hydrographic analysis- Fosse/ Oh, to check that out? Thisrepresents only areasonably occur~etranscrlptlon ofthelowe City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 #8 page 2 Horow/ Right and so there is a baseline established. Fosse/ Be glad to do that. Would you like us to do so? Horow/ Well, what is the council's reaction. My concern is that you establish a baseline and if something happens in the next decade, he is able to, if it is done over again, then he is able to see whether or not there was a problem. David Fitzgerald/ I have heard the explanation the peak arriving sooner. That this really isn't going to cause an additional problem and I guess if I was really assured that that was- assured as much as the science can prove but I am concerned that he says if we do this study we could know that. I just wondering if there is a step that is missing. Horow/ The only thing I could think of is this is not private property. Ralston Creek is public r.o.w. Isn't that right? Fosse/ No, it is not. Horow/ And he has spent the money on this. So if this is under his insurance policy, would it be useful for him to know such an analysis? Fosse/ I would be glad to provide it for him but the bottom line is I don't know that I can really provide a lot of comfort because Ralston Creek is going to- It has always flooded and it will continue to flood and problems will continue to occur and a stack of papers that says well this really didn't make it any worse, I don't know that that is going to provide a great deal of comfort even though we may be comfortable with that. Nov/ I don't see the real point. Fitzgerald/ I have lived in the house for 17 years and I have not had a problem with the flooding from the creek in my house and I am delighted with that and I am sorry the neighbors have had that but, you know, further down creek does this just get moved down further and we can't do anything about it because it moves further down. Maybe it is a dilemma that has no real solution. Horow/ Thank you very much. Any other public discussion? Maggie Moore/ Do I need to sign in? Thisrepresents only areasonably accurate transcription ofthelowa City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 Horow/ Yes, please. Moore/ Just along the same lines. I am one of the tenants on Fairview Avenue and we really do appreciate the city council's appropriation of the money for this and we can't urge you enough to stick to the time table. We did have some pretty serious stor~ sewer problems in 1993 and even though we thought that that might be the flood, we are dealing with homes that are 50 years old that have no water in their basements. Just this past month when we had the downpour in June we are talking about not just water in the basement but huge railroad ties that were moved from the end of our yard to our patios some 50 feet. Other residents experienced extreme damage. And again, it is not just basements. It's into the living area. You know, we have pictures if you would llke to look at them where there is actually white water caps from the water that is moving through our yard. We are the storm sewer and I can appreciate what you are saying about the Ralston Creek because I think no one wants to pass it along. But I think that it is a very serious problem. We really don't also know why it is that this year, given the dry season, that there was additional water difficulties and we can't help to think that there is something up from our homes on Fairview Avenue that may be intensifying that. We just appreciate sticking to the time table and moving as quickly as possible. Thank you. Horow/ Anyone else care to address council on this issue? Glenn $timmel/ 302 S. 7th. Glad to have the opportunity to talk to the council and mayor and city manager and rest of you ladies and gentleman. I consider myself kind of an old timer around this area. I am 70 some years old and we lived at 1403 E. College and I wasn't a neighbor of the man that lives in the house he talked about but Jim Pearson lived in that house and was a local real estate man and we never had any trouble with water going across College Street ever and it never has. But I know what part of the problem is on Fairview is-I think this lady lives in a home built by Mr. Memler and it has a basement garage and I had a basement garage at 1403 E. College and thank God I was out in Colorado- I had a wife on a nice vacation and when we got home a week later everybody said gosh, you missed the big flood. What are you talking about? Well, some of the relatives and neighbors, friends came in and had to scrub out your basement because you had about five feet of water in it from that basement garage and most of the creek. This was about 40 some years ago. So Ralston Creek is This repr~ents only aroason~ly accurate trana~lptlon of thelowa City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 #8 page 4 kind of a mean old boy and I thought over the years here that we got rid of part of that problem by building our two retention basins over on Rochester and also out on Scott Blvd out there but evidently something is wrong that we aren't getting it in operation or something. My main concern tonight is I live at 302 S. 7th Avenue. The sewer, as far as I am concerned is going to go through between me and Marian Smith and it, to me, is going to do five cents of good to my property and my property is built by McCreedy Construction 30 some years ago and I think some of you know McCreedy was a very fine builder and he built for Larry Stohl and we are the second owners of the home because we consider it a very nice home. Hope to live there a few more years. But when the home was built they discovered quick sand at the footings and instead of continuing on with the basement the McCreedy Construction Company went in and laid large footings to hold what we call a tall space of about four feet now. I have talked to your city planners on this project and they want five feet of my property from the property line to dump dirt and this sewer area will be eight feet deep and if there is quick sand there which I understand and I also talked to these people and they said there is going to be no problem. But by golly I will tell you folks, if you can shove a pipe down there on Fairview between those houses, I think you can sure shove a pipe between our houses. So that is my main concern tonight is I hope we don't have a damn big digger in between our houses because I have talked to one engineer and he says I am going to tell you something. He says there isn't room for a digger to get in there and swing his boom around. So let's give us a little consideration on it. And when we are talking water here, really the problem isn't roofs and all these eave troughs we find. But in our area it is old City High School. If you remember they have been building on there and I have been watching the water come down the street and I will tell you I feel damn sorry for those people down there on College Court and also these people on Fairview. Because I will tell you they really had a mess when you folks-somebody said we bad three inches of rain and I know that we had a little more than that. I tell you if three inches of rain did that I wonder what seven would do sometime to them down there. And I hate to think of that one poor lady, she has to carry her sandbags out to block the water out of her garage about every time she hears the weather man say we are going to get a couple more inches of rain. So I tell you what. I am thankful that we are giving some consideration out there. But also when you are talking about the old creek, like I say-I live by it and yes, we own part of it and every time it flooded why we used to Thlsrepresents only areasonably accurate transcription ofthelowa City council meeting ofJuly 11,1995. F071195 #8 page 5 kind of watch it fly by and like I say, a lot of people don't realize that that is their problem and it runs with the landowner there. So I hope, folks, when we are considering this sewer and when we are bidding it, I hope between I and Marian Smith that we shove the pipe through there with a ram. Thank you. Horow/ Thank you, sir. Mr. Fosse, would you like to address this? Fosse/ You bet. We will be bidding an alternate for that portion to bore that pipe through there. If that proves to be cost prohibitive or we don't get any interest from a bidder in boring that through we have designed that with a smaller diameter plastic pipe that will require smaller machinery than the concrete pipe and we have beefed up the bedding so we are more comfortable and it is a good spec on the plastic pipe to get that through there. Nov/ I have concerns about a smaller pipe. If you really think that the amount of water needs a bigger pipe, why are you going to substitute a smaller pipe? Fosse/ Yes, I didn't speak very clearly on that issue. The smaller pipe and what is going in down stream- There is a four foot diameter pipe going in up to Fairview Avenue. At this point it will be a foot and a half in diameter. So comparably, it is smaller. Kubby/ No matter how it is put in it is the same size pipe? Whether it is dug or whether it is bored? Fosse/ Oh, correct, it will be the size to carry the water shed. Horow/ Thank you. Anyone else care to address council on this issue, the Fairview/High Street Storm Sewer? Thank you. Karen Gerald Wheaton/ I am a Fairview Avenue person and I thought maybe you would be interested in these pictures just in case anybody comes to you and says ah, you oughten do that project because we are real happy that it sounds like it is finally going to happen and it really, again, we think it is not only an inconvenience but a danger. I mean, when my neighbor talked about white caps. I mean when the water hit Fairview Avenue it is churning and it broke up an asphaulted alley next to my house and it broke it up down to the tree roots. So the water is rushing. I mean, if a little kid happened to have been away from home during that thunderstorm and just walked home from Thisrepresents only areasonably accuratetranscrlption ofthelowa City council meeting of July11,1995. F071195 #8 page 6 a neighbors house, he could have been drowned. I mean that is so bizarre that that is happening in our neighborhood, but it is. It is not just-it is not really just a matter of people being inconvenienced and having to use wet vacs. So, the first one shows-I am just going to pass them around (distributes photos). Horow/ Anyone else care to address council? Declare the p.h. closed. Thisrepresents only areesonably accurate transcription ofthelowa City council meeting of July 11,1995, F071195 #9 page i ITEM NO. 9 - CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVIN~ PLANS SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT, AND ESTII~qTE OF COST FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FAIRVIEW AVENUE/HIgH STREET STORM SEWER PROJECTt ESTABLISHIN~ AMOUNT OF BID SECURITY TO ACCOMPANY F~CH BID, DIRECTIN~ CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, AND FIXIN~ TIME AND PLACE FOR RECEIPT OF BIDS AT 10:30 A.M., AUGUST 1~ 1995. Horow/ Moved by Pigott, seconded by Throg. Any discussion? Kubby/ I guess it is a good reminder for me that water is a powerful thing. I mean all of us knew that in '93 or learned that lesson again. We can't totally control water. We can manage it. We can manipulate where it goes and where it doesn't go but we can't totally control it and when that rain came, Mr. Stimmel is still here, but I got 4 1/2 inches in my rain gage in my backyard and I live right next to Ralston Creek and I was watching it real carefully, very nervously and it is-But I think the water dams at Hickory Hill and Scott Blvd. do work. I have been in close contact with the person who owned my house previously who was the original owner and said with the rain like that you would have water in your living room and sewer in your basement and I have neither. So I think we are trying to back track and correct some problems. As more development happens we have more impervious soil and so we need to manage that water from the developments in a way that it doesn't adversely affect the inner city neighborhoods and all of that is very challenging as we grow to make sure those new developments are taking care of their own water properly. Horow/ There is a motion on the floor. Any further discussion? Mr. Stimmel, one more- Glenn Stimmel/ When I mentioned City High, water from City High drains clear down to Ralston Creek there of course. I tell you what, I have done a lot of walking in the neighborhood and enjoy it. But the storm sewer that we are talking about here is draining the north parking lot of City High and that also comes down the north end of Morningside there and the south part of that parking lot also comes down College Street and then the south parking lot of City High does the same thing. They have got the speed bumps in there and of course some does go down Fourth Avenue over there. And then they put the new parking lot in and yes, we have built that catch basin up there of course to stop it and that too, folks, I hope to God Thlsrepresen~ only areasonab~ accumte ~an$cfip~on ofthelowa City council mee~ng of Juiy 11,1995, F071195 #9 page 2 the Fire Department or somebody doesn't have to fish some student out of a car sometime in there because when we had that five inch rain the other day and I mean five inches, the water run over the street there and you know how people like to play round and like I say, I hope to God we don't loose some of our citizens in that plump. And I tell you that water really does come down Morningside Drive from that north parking lot. It comes around the corner there, 7th Avenue, and there is a catch basin. There is three catch basins at 7th and College and the city re-worked that intersection there a few years ago and re-built those two catch basins that evidently they don't take the water like they should and then there is two more catch basins from that area on down College Street and those overflow and that water comes on down to College Court and then it ends up going down Fairview because the street lays that way so it goes down that way. And then the water that comes down from the south parking lot there comes down College, comes around the corner on 7th and also off of High Street and Wilson there, it comes around 7th. There is one catch basin there by me and then down on College Court there is three catch basins and that is where the problem is it looks like and then on Fairview they have two catch basins there. So, I tell you what, we just don't have enough, well, places for the water to go. So I think this is a start but I tell you folks, I don't think it is the answer. It is a start. Horow/ Thank you very much. Okay, the motion is on the floor. Roll call-(Yes). Thlsrepresents onlyaroasonably accuratetranscription ofthelowe City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 Agenda Iowa City City Council Special Council Meeting July 11, 1995 Page 5 ITEM NO. 10 - CiTY COUNCIL INFORMATION, ITEIVt NO. 11 - REPORT ON ITEMS FROM THE CiTY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY, a. City Manager. b. City Attorney. ITEM NO, 12 - ADJOURNMENT. #10 page i ITEM NO. ~0 - CZT¥ COUNCIL INFOI%~ATION. Horow/ City council Information. Nov/ What is going on these days with the pigeons? I have a letter in the mail from Janice Goetz saying that this is not a city function. Wolto/ I asked Anne to respond to Janice Goetz's letter. What has happened-The case is moving along on two fronts. Maryann Rasmussen has filed a private nuisance action in district court. She is represented by her own attorney and we at the city have issued a citation for improperly issued permits for the pigeon coop because it was issued as inhabiting-as an inclosure for pets who would ordinarily live and reside within a home and so we are revoking the permit as improperly issued and I don't believe that that has been set for trial yet in terms of the city case. I know it hasn't been set for trial in the civil private suit. Nov/ And you have taken care of answering this letter? Woito/ Yes. Lehman/ We are not involved in this by choice. Is that correct? Woito/ Well, yes we are. It was brought to our attention- Lehman/ But once it was brought to our attention don't we have to revoke the permit that was issued in error? Woito/ Well, it took a while to get all of the facts together and look at all of the law. But eventually someone took a closer look at the Zoning Ordinance and decided and we realized that the permit was erroneously issued. Nov/ And this is many years ago, isn't it? Woito/ This is many years ago, yeah. Nov/ And the zoning law many years ago did not allow this either? I understand the current law. But what about years ago? Woito/ Well, no, the permit was issued for pets that live within a house and I mean it is the same now and I don't believe they are the type of pets that live within a home. Cockateels not withstanding. This represents only. reasonably accur=te trans~lptlon of the Iowa City council meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 #10 page 2 Kubby/ Does that mean that someone couldn't have a legal pigeon coop? Woito/ No, it does not mean that. Kubby/ You can get a permit under another venue from the city? Woito/ Yes. And I think also that I believe the Animal Control Advisory Committee was going to be looking at that from a broader perspective of whether- You know, many cities don't permit pigeon coops within the city limits. But we were sort of waiting for a report from the Advisory Committee on that. But you can ban them. I mean, that is certainly up to you. Nov/ Is this a distinction between pets and livestock? Kubby/ You can't have livestock in town. Nov/ Yeah, that is what I am trying to say. Woito/ It is similar, yes. Horow/ Anything else? Nov/ No. Jim- Throg/ I noticed in a recent issue of The Nations cities Weekly there was a lengthy article about massive cuts in federal funding that will be coming our way over the next seven years and it is worth noting that the CDBG Program is suppose to be cut by 28%. The Home Funding Program is suppose to be cut by $1.8 billion and I don't know what that means in terms of a percent. If it is significant for us. Deep cuts in Section 8 Assisted Housing and Public Housing, phasing out Transit Operating Assistance, increasing the local cost of purchasing new Transit equipment. All of that stuff is coming our way and it is not going to be stopped, right, so, and I know that Steve is quite aware of this and it just means that the next city council and maybe the one right after it is going to be facing real big cuts in the federal government. It is either going to result in the reduction of services to the public with regard to Transit and so on or an increase in local taxes or revenue fees of some kind, some how. It is just there. Horow/ I would comment that the Iowa League of Municipalities has asked for 1995-96 legislative policy issues to be sent into them to develop, certainly at the state level, looking at what Thisrepresents only areasonably accurate transcription ofthe Iowa City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 #10 page 3 can be done to mitigate, if possible, this at the state level. So I would be asking you to get to me any issues for consideration by the League Policy Committee. They are asking us to get this back by July 17. So, I just got this and will get that back but you point is well taken. Nov/ I am on that committee. Horow/ Good, great, it is all yours. Get them to Naomi. Throg/ It might be helpful, although maybe premature, I don't know. But it might be helpful to ask staff to quantify specific affects on city programs that will be associated with that list of cuts. Horow/ Steve did this before a number of years ago. Kubby/ So those things, as outlined, did they pass the Senate as well? Throg/ They passed the House Senate Conference committee which- It means they just adopted a joint Congressional Guideline that the President doesn't have an opportunity to veto and it is going to be used as a guideline for adopting particular appropriations, bills and so fourth. Horow/ Thank you, Jim. Any other- Nov/ Actually this is (can't hear). It shouldn't go to me. Horow/ Oh, okay. Pigott/ In that same vein the Community Development Celebration is coming and I don't know whether you mentioned that. It is this 13th from 3:00 to 6:00 at Goodwill and I think it is an opportunity to highlight some of the positive elements of the CDBG moneys that we do get so that when we do lobby the people in Washington about these cuts we can say specifically what they do. I know we already know and it would be great to turn out. So, I plan to be there and I hope other people do to. Atkins/ 3:30 I think. Nov/ You can come at 3:30 and you could leave. Kubby/ I have a couple of things since we don't have council time at our informal. We got a letter from people who own property Thisrepresents only areasonably accurate transcription ofthelowa City council meeting of July 11,1995. F071195 #10 page 4 across from Sturgis Ferry Park, recycling bins and it is something that I know we talked about before. I don't agree totally with the tone of this but I agree with the points made in this and that if we are going to go after people for oil on the ground and we want to facilitate people respecting our recycling bins and not contaminate them then we have to have a clean shop and so I don't know specifically what I am asking for. I guess I want council agreement that we need to clean up our act in that specific area which will help other people clean up. Arkins/ And we are preparing a response to that. Kubby/ We need to do something different in what we are saying so that there is- I have two kind of'water-sewer things that aren't about rates. Should I wait? One of them is the letter, kind of a precursor on the specific letter from Steve to the DNR. Horow/ Oh, maybe that Atkins/ The draft letter? Kubby/ Yeah, the draft letter. Atkins/ I got that on the informal agenda. Kubby/ And the other thing is from Historic Preservation Commission about the Butler Residence and the idea that it is a historically significant structure and not just physically the structure but to the history to our community. I guess I would like us to look at what (can't hear). Arkins/ I think Chuck has already taken some action to either secure the building so we can deal with that issue. Kubby/ I wanted to do some follow-up. We had talked about meeting with the University Hts. city council about Melrose Avenue issue. I guess I don't want too much time to pass. That we need to request that or respond to a request that has been made by them before too much time goes by. Horow/ There is that one and the council's throughout Johnson County visa vis the landfill. It is just difficult to get everybody to agree on a time. I am just saying at least designate somebody° If we can't get everyone, then as many as possible° This represents only a reasona~lyaccurot8 transcript]on oft he Iowa City council mes~ng of July 11, 1995. F071195 page 5 Kubby/ And at least to communicate saying we want to have a meeting. We are struggling with schedules but we are going to deal with this as soon as we can. Nov/ I think if we have someone absent it may not be the worse thing. It is very difficult in the summer time to get all seven of us at the same time. (Can't hear). Kubby/ I don't know if the committee looking at the ped mall is finalized or not. Arkins/ Real close. Horow/ Well, a person that I would be interested in and I think he would be interested in because of the communication I have had with him over the years about different things is Jim Clayton. That even though he might have some very interesting ideas I think that that makes the discussion more thorough. Atkins/ We placed a call him today but he is on vacation until 27th. I will get back to him. Kubby/ Lastly I am interested in asking the mayor to re-write a letter she has already written. Sue has been really good on keeping on top of lobbying about getting money for the Dam study but then got kind of side whacked and it isn't going to be done. But they are kind of starting the process over again. So, I guess if you are interested in- Horow/ I met the Colonel at the Memorial Day Services at Coralville Dam and I pointedly reminded him about this. He kind of blushed. We didn't really get anywhere but thank you for reminding me. Yeah, he did blush. Kubby/ I think the important thing is especially talk about non- partisan support for this and it is compatible with what the Corps is not already doing, not replacing what the Corps is already doing and that the goals is to reduce the overall damage which actually reduces flood relief money that FEMA has to pay out. So it is an investment in many ways, not just in the destruction of property and the environment. But it helps the federal people save money by not having to pay our FEMA. To me that seems like a pretty strong point for the investment on the front end. Horow/ Do you see that the Congressional study of the costs of recouping from 1993 flood essentially justified the Thisrepresents only areasonably accurate transcription ofthelowa City council meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 #10 page 6 report, saying in the long run that it is cheaper to buy out rather than having people purchase and build in the flood plain. Thank heavens, guys. Okay. Kubby/ I have one last thing and that is about the Neighborhood Stop Sign Program. I wasn't sure from the assessment. Is this just information that we got from Marcia and John? There is no conclusion as to what we are going to do. Atkins/ It was pretty overwhelming that you liked the idea. Unless I hear differently- Kubby/ Well, I would like to suggest that we keep the system but modify it because I believe there are too many stop signs in some places. That every block like for three blocks on a street that there may be 40 oars a day on doesn't make sense and that I would like to tone it down. For me, I live in a neighborhood that was part of the experiment and I value the experiment and I am glad we were willing to take the time and energy to do it and I think it was successful that we learned some stuff. But I think it could be moderated. I think it is overkill. Horow/ Anybody else have any comments on this? I don't have any problem with that. Nov/ I don't know. Pigott/ I wonder how you determine which ones you take out. That would be my only question. I suppose there is a way to determine that. Kubby/ For example, in part of my neighborhood, most of the traffic that is volume and speed traffic is going north -south. Many of the stop signs I am talking about are east-west and so I would want to keep the north-south ones in the quantity that they are and not necessarily X all the east-west but moderate the east-west. There is one, to be specific, on the corner of 5th and C. I have ridden my bike down that corner for 2 1/2 years. I haven't encountered a vehicle of any kind, bike, motorped, car three times on that corner there at the stop sign. It doesn't make sense to me. It makes it hard for people to respect a stop sign. Horow/ May I have a suggestion then that we ask Marcia to get back to the Neighborhood Associations. If there is any other sites of modification that they would like to recommend because we Thisrepresents only a reasonably accurate tranemlptlon ofthelowa Clty coun~l meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 #10 page 7 don't want to play favoritism to your neighborhood. Kubby/ And that is not what I would be asking. Nov/ They have received some of those specifics. We could probably find out. Throg/ I have a reaction, too. It seems to me that at a policy level the message that I got from the two memos was basically that the policy works. Horow/ Except that it is costly. Throg/ Well, I didn't see anything about it being literally costly. I saw words saying there might be some tradeoffs. But I didn't see anything about actual cost. what I did see is that the neighbors think that traffic speeds are reduced significantly and in terms of potential accidents and safety problems for neighborhoods, that is where it is at is the speeds. So I am less concerned about the affects on volume. I am very happy with affects on speeds. It strikes me that it is a winner. Horow/ Jim, the observation from Jim Brachtel is this desire on the part of residences in favor of maintaining the program must be balanced against the cost of further driver disregard for city traffic control devices, additional police enforcement, and the cost of an expanded program. Throg/ Right and all I was saying was there weren't any monetary costs mentioned there in that particular- That is all I am- Nov/ An extra officer to do enforcement is probably (can't hear). We don't know that. Kubby/ (Can't hear) suggestion is that we go back to the Neighborhood Associations because I value that the Council of Neighborhoods to say. It is not an all or nothing proposition. Is there a way to tone it down but still reap the benefits and they might say no. That is fine. But I think probably the other issue for me is that we are trying to encourage people to find alternative modes of transportation, one of them being bicycling. If you are a beginning commuter it takes a lot of energy to stop at signs totally, legally in those neighborhoods for every single block. For like four blocks there is a stop sign. You discourage people from taking that advantage. No matter what way you go you come to that. Thisrepresents only areasonably accuratetranscription ofthelowa City council meeting of July 91,1995. F071195 #10 page 8 Horow/ Okay. Do you have anything else? Kubby/ No. I will save my last thing for the other- Baker/ This is a wonderful bunch of people because I can always count on six items and five of them have been covered. Throg/ You should insist on going first, Larry. Baker/ (Can't hear). I have one that was not covered but I want to follow up on something Jim said because it was on my list of things of what I was going to talk in more detail next week of when we got on camera again because I wanted a more general discussion because we had some memos in our packet recently about the water, the flood- the Corp of Engineers wanting to split the cost and stuff. We are already starting to see those costs (can't hear) and I was (can't hear) in the public. This is just a trickle compared to what is coming and not that I will ever be a partisan politician but I want to remind all those people who may have voted for people who are supporting these particular cuts. Throg/ Well, there are consequences and we don't know what they are until they start showing up. Atkins/ We are having a meeting tomorrow (can't hear) about that. We will know more next week. Baker/ The house issue (can't hear). Atkins/ The Butler. Baker/ Remember six months ago you and I talked about the possibility- Steve and I talked behind the scenes about- I have always had this dream of Iowa City having its own historic museum. Iowa City history sort of in a place. I don't know what the condition of this house is in or what it is like or whether (can't hear). Arkins/ I don't know the size of the house or its condition or whether we would have to move it or not. Baker/ You might talk to Doug and Doug Russell because Doug and I have talked about this- Atkins/ If we are going to preserve the house I suspect you want to preserve it for public use (can't hear). This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the Iowa City cou~lcil meeting of July 11, 1995. F071195 #10 page 9 Baker/ (Can't hear). turn around and sell it or we can turn it into a museum. I don't know what condition it is in. Atkins/ It is pretty ragged from what I saw. We are just trying to secure it right now until we decide what we want to do. Baker/ There is a lot of material out there in the city that we could sort of coordinate (can't hear). Horow/ (can't hear). Baker/ Maybe talk to Doug Russell. Now, the one thing that did not come up and somebody on staff can help me with is is the Exotic Animal Ordinance coming our way? Woito/ We already have one. It is on the books now. Baker/ Is there a new and a revision coming our way? Kubby/ Yeah, there is. Baker/ I got three phone calls about this that I know nothing about. Woito/ The advisory committee is forwarding a recommendation to Karen. Kubby/ It hasn't gone to them yet? Because it is still getting written and I actually suggested to our Animal Control officer that there be some input from people who are raising exotics. Whether there are people who would no longer be in business because of some ordinance or not and that they are really talking about rules like lions and tigers and bears when they are talking exotics. They are not talking about- But the other thing the ordinance would do is talk about permitting for kennels, making people get permits if they are having a petting zoo or a circus or some kind of act or exhibit that comes in to make sure that animals are properly treated. Baker/ The concern expressed to had heard stories about parakeets. me over the phone were that they (can't hear) birds and fish, Kubby/ That is not the intent of the Animal Control officer. Baker/ So if it gets to us we will know (can't hear). It is coming anytime soon? Thisrepresents only a reasonably accurate transcription ofthnlowa City council meeting of July 11.1995. F071195 #10 page 10 Kubby/ I don't think so. I think Lisa is too busy. Baker/ I am in no hurry to push it forward. Kubby/ There may be some people talking about a petition to ban the sale of exotics or possession of exotics in the city. I have asked that Lisa contact those people to become part of the discussion about this. Horow/ All right, thank you. I was about to say- I don't want to be a Pollyanna through all of this but we had a heck of a good time at the 4th of July celebration. The 4th parade got scratched out but we had a very nice 4th of July parade on the 8th of July and Bruno and Molly and Ernie and I represented all of you and we had an awfully lot of un. We really did. The 3rd and 4th of July, Ernie was really very much distracted by all of the kids. They were having a good time and so were we. But what was really a lot of fun was the Jazz Festival on the 3rd and 4th and the inter-generational representation of citizens there was just fantastic. I understand that an industrial engineer graduate student who did a nose count per square foot and the two days combined there were close to 2,000 people there. That is good. That is really good and the restaurant that I was in on the 4th of July I just casually asked them whether or not they could notice the increased patrons and he said no doubt about it. Absolutely no doubt about it. So this is economic development and I am baffled that more stores were not open for this because they would have made a lot of money on this. Throg/ And we helped support them. Kubby/ We have been given kudos publicly many times during the day. Horow/ However, this is going to come again to the next council. You are going to have to do something about it. Thisrepresents only areasonably accurate transcription of theiowa City council meeting of July 11,1995, F071195 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: RE: July 7, 1995 City Council City Manager Work Session Agendas and Meeting Schedule July 11, 1995 6:30 P.M. 7:00 P,M. - 7:00 P.M. 7:20 P.M. - 7:40 P.M. - 7:55 P.M. - 8:40 P.M. - 9:00 P.M. - 9:15 P.M. - July 17, 1995 6:30 P.M. - July 18, 1995 6:30 P.M. 7:30 P.M. July 31, 1995 6:30 P.M. August 1, 1995 7:30 P.M. Tuesday Special Cit~ Council Meeting - Council Chambers City Council Work Session - Council Chambers SEATS Contract Land Use - Water Plant Site (Science Center) Task Force - Housing and Inspection Services Water/wastewater rate analysis/DNR revised schedule Lighting enhancement - parking ramps Census Cemetery - update City Council Work Session - Council Chambers Agenda pending City Council Work Session - Council Chambers 'Agenda pending Regular City Council Meeting - Council Chambers City Council Work Session - Council Chambers Agenda pending Regular City. Council Meeting - Council Chambers Monday Tuesday Monday Tuesday PENDING LIST Appointments to the Human Rights Commission and Board of Adjustment - July 18, 1995 Appointment to the Mayor's Youth Employment Board - August 1, 1995