HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-09-26 Correspondence210 Gilbert St.
Iowa City, IA 52245
(319) 354-4668
Sept. 20, 1995
City oflowa City
City Council
410 E. Washington St.
lowa City, Iowa 52245
Dear City Council:
I am writing to inquire about the cultural resource management survey on the parcels
of land recen~y acquired by the City of Iowa City. I am interested in submitting a survey
bid on the aforementioned land. I am experienced and qualified to complete such a project
as I have been active in the field of Cultural Resource Management for the last 6 years.
Also, 1 am very familiar with the parcels and have previously done rosearch in the area.
By Federal law (Historic Preservation Act of 1%6) any undertaking utilizing Federal
monies, insarance or permits are required to complete a survey to inventory all cultural-
resources that are to be impacted by said undertaking. Scientific and systematic
archaeological and geomorphological surveys are required in such undertakings with the
final report being sent with mitigation recommendations to the State Historical Protection
Office. The State Historical Protection Office then gives the authorization to proceed with
the undertaking.
Please contact me if yon are interested in a project bid and I will gladly send one
along with my resume.
Sincerely,
Randy Dickson
Preliminary Discussion Draft: June 2, 1995
Guidelines for Archaeological
Investigations in Iowa
Jointly Prepared by
the Association of Iowa Archaeologists (AIA) ~' c,~
the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA),~.~ :=
and the State Historical Society of Iowa, ~
in its role as the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO}
In troduc t i on
These archaeological investigation guidelines are intended
for two audiences: (1) federal, state, and local agencies and
other organizations in need of archaeological services; and (2)
professional archaeologists desiring to provide such services in
Iowa.
For the most part, these guidelines are not new. Various
procedural guidelines have been set forth by the Association of
Iowa Archaeologists (AIA), the Office of the State Archaeologist
(OSA), and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) since
each organization's inception. This booklet is new, however, as
it represents the first time the various guidelines have been
integrated into a single document and endorsed by all three
organizations. By compiling these guidelines into a single
document, it is hoped that the procedures will be clarified.
Each of the organizations involved in developing these
guidelines has a particular role. The Association of Iowa
Archaeologists (AIA) is comprised of professional archaeologists
who live or work in Iowa. The AIA has three categories of
membership: Fellow, Associate, and Honorary. Fellows and
Associates are voting members who form the Executive Council of
the AIA and whose role it is to set professional standards
regarding the quality and direction of archaeological research
and education in Iowa. The AIA has guidelines for Phase I and
Phase II investigations, geomorphological assessments, and
historic archaeological research. The individual guidelines were
discussed, revised, and ultimately adopted by the membership over
the course of several meetings between 1986 and 1993.
The Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) has statutory
authority over a number of archeological matters, including the
protection of ancient human remains, the release of site
locational information, the operation of a curatorial facility,
and the maintenance of the state's archaeological site inve. ntory
(Code of Iowa 263B). As part of this responsibility, the OSA has
deposits in the field and be able to describe and analyze the
,sits using standard terminology and methods (detailed under
Geomorphological Field Work). The geomorphologist should have or
be near completion of a post-graduate degree in an earth-science
field (geology, physical geography, pedology, Quaternary
Studies), or have demonstrated professional expertise in field
geomorphology through experience and publications. Previous
field work experience in the Upper Midwest is recommended to
insure an adequate knowledge of regional stratigraphy, soils, and
research issues.
It is the responsibility of the project principal
investigator and the geomorphologist to integrate the
geomorphological investigation into those aspects of the project
where questions of context and site preservation potential need
to be addressed.
Laws Protecting Cultural Resources
Federal Laws
co
CD ~
.ost archaeological work cond. cted in the state is arr d"
out pursuant to Section 106 of the National Mistoric R[_e_s~va_~ioh
Act. Section 106 mandates that federal agencies take into ~
acc"'~unt the effects of their actions on properties listed in or
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
As part of this requirement, the federal agency must consult with
the SHPO and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
These review procedures are often referred to as the "Section 106
process," and are set forth in the regulations issued by the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 CFR 800). The
Section 106 process is an important aspect of statewide historic
preservation planning. It is intended to identify those historic
properties than may be affected by an undertaking, and to devise
ways to minimize the adverse effects of the project on the
historic properties.
Each federal agency is responsible for ensuring that its
programs comply with the mandate set forth in Section 106. These
Guidelines for Archaeoloqical Investiqations in Iowa are intended
to provide guidance to the federal agencies, as those agencies
work to fulfill their legal responsibilities. These guidelines
specify the minimum amount of technical information necessary to
carry out historic properties investigations that will contribute
to the statewide preservation plan. Reports which do not meet
these standards cannot be integrated into the state's historic
properties inventory.
In addition to Section 106, federal agencies have other
6
legal responsibilities toward historic properties. Section 110
of the National Historic Preservation Act sets forth proactive .
measures which federal agencies must implement on lands which
they own. Likewise, some sections of the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) apply to lands owned by
federal agencies.
As stated above, Section 106 pertains to federal actions
(undertakings). Such undertakings can occur on land owned by any
entity--a federal or state agency, a local government, or a
private individual. All are subiect to Section 106.
Undertakings include not only iederally-funded actions, but also
such things as federal licensing or permittznq actions. For
~xample, a local economic development activity which includes a
Small Business Administration loan guarantee as part of the
financing package, is subject to Section 106. An undertaking is
defined as "any project, activity, or program that can result in
changes in the character or use of historic properties, if any
such properties are located in the area of potential effects.
The project, activity, or program must be under the direct or
indirect jurisdiction of a federal agency or licensed or assisted
by a federal agency. Undertakings include new and continuing
projects, activities, or programs and any of their elements not
previously considered under Section 106" (36 CFR Part 800.2).
The federal agency has legal responsibility for identifying
the undertaking and defining its Area of Potential Effect.
Regulations specify that the Area of Potential Effect must
include areas directly or indirectly impacted by the action. Any
individual or entity can challenge a federal agency's definition
of an undertaking or its area of effect. Procedures for
complying with Section 106 are set forth in 36 CFR Part 800, and
are outlined in "The Section 106 Process," below.
Before describing the Section 106 process, it should be
noted that there are some exceptions to the "normal" procedure.
Some agencies have negotiated Programmatic Agreements with the
Advisory Council and the SHPO. These Programmatic Agreements
allow an agency to implement an alternate procedure for complying
with Section 106 for specific agency programs. There is an ever-
changing list of Programmatic Agreements. Most Programmatic
Agreements are negotiated on a state or regional basis. Some
Programmatic Agreements are negotiated on a national level. In
these instances, the National Conference of State Historic
Preservation Officers (NCSHPO) negotiates and signs the
Programmatic Agreement on behalf of SHPOs.
With the
Preservation,
To date, the Department of Housing and Urban Development
the only agency which has Council-approved counterpart
regulations. HUD's regulations are
approval of the Advisory Council on Historic
agencies can operate under counterpart regulations.
(HUD) is
7
found at 24 CFR Par~:58.o;
C-
,-
358 Magowan
Iowa City IA 52246
12 September 1995
Iowa City City Council
410 East Washington
Iowa City IA 52240
To the City Council:
I saw a back-hoe on Dubuque Street by the river. It was made in Japan. As you
know, Japan closes its mm'kets to manufactured goods from this country in order to take
care of their workers. Iowa city should take cm'e of Iowa workers and American workers.
Please replace this back-hoe with an American one.
Thank you.
September 12, 1995
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Iowa City
410 East Washington St.
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
Dear Mayor and Councilors,
As the Chairperson of the Iowa City Downtown Association's
Parking and Transit Committee, I would like for you to
consider changing the Bus and Shop reimbursement rate from
$.50 to $.35 for participating merchants. This would match
the cost of the Park and Shop rate and allow us to recruit
more participants into the bus portion of the program.
Currently we have 76 merchants in the Park and Shop program
but only 32 using the Bus and Shop program. The usual
reason given for not doing the bus program is the higher
cost. When a minimum purchase is $10, the current rate of
$.50 is 5% of the sale.
The Downtown Association's Park and Shop/Bus and Shop
Program expects to bill participants about $190,000 for
parking and bus passes in 1995. We are responsible for all
administrative costs involved in collecting these fees,
including any losses from stores going out of business.
Joe Fowler, who is a member of our Committee has indicated
that this reduction to $.35 would result in a revenue loss
to the City of about $4,000 annually. At $.35 per ride and
313 transit days per year (365 less Sundays), 37 new riders
per day would recover these costs. Just 10 new participants
giving 4 bus passes each would easily cover the cost to the
City for this change in the reimbursement rate. This is
very likely to occur.
We have also undertaken a marketing program to shoppers and
recognize that every bus rider frees a parking space for
another customer. We would like to increase bus ridership
by the usage of the Bus and Shop program, and with your
support, we will.
Thank you for
I will be available for any questions.
considering this matter.
Sincere~,//~.~
~ Gross, Chairperson
DTA Parking and Transit Committee
cc: Joe Fowler
Advertiser
Park Free, RIde Free
Free ParlOng & Riding -
Can't Beat 11~aU
lxl ads
~usses are
~ark Free
Ride Free!
1 x2 ads
Parking Spaces
~W e can
her you Shop, Eat Lunch,
Get a Good Book, & Park Free?
~'~'~.ike to Park in the Shade?
2x2 ads
OME
N
Ask About FREE Parking
and FREE Bus Rides
With A Qualifying Purchase
Valid For One FREE Bus Ride
Guest of:.
Expires:
Valid For One Hour FREE Parking
Guest Or:
in the Dubuque St.
or Capitol St. Ramps
Expires.
Melrose Avenue Neighborhood Association
629 Melrose Avenue, Iowa City, Iowa 52246
(319) 354-4171
o ~
I
MELROSE AVENUE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
ALTERNATIVE #3
NEW TWO LANE BRIDGE AND 11-IttEE LANE ROAD
MELROSE AVENUE
CiTY OF IOWA CiTY
ALTERNATIVE ~2
NEW ~ LANE IINIDCE AND TWO LANE ROAD
MELROSE AVENUE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
AL"rERNATIVE
EXISTING ~ LANE BRIDGE AND TWO LANE ROA[
'i
MELROSE AVENUE
CITf OF IOWA CITY
ALTERNA'flVE #6
NEW FOUR LANE BRIDGE AND RVE LANE ROAD
-,~
MELROSE AVENUE MELROSE AVENUE
CITY OF IOWA CITY CITY OF IOWA Cl'f'f
ALTE"RNA~VE #5 AL'rERNA'RVE
NEW FOUR LARE BRIDGE AND FOUR LANE ROAD NEW THREE I,~E BRIDGE ANO THREE LANE ROAD
/ : ·
0
p .-...
m
I
MELROSE AVENUE
Cl'P)' OF IOWA CITY
ALTERNATIVE
NEW FOUR LANE BRIDGE AND FIVE LANE ROAD
I
MELROSE AVENUE
CITY OF IOWA CITY
ALTERNATIVE #5
HEW FOUR LANE BRIDGE AND RJI~ LANE ROAD
MELROSE AVENUE
CITY OF IOWA Cl'Pr
ALTERNATIVE #4
NEW THREE Ij~HE BRIDGE AND THREE LANE ROAD