HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-06-29 Info PacketCITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
June 16, 1999
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
IP1 Meeting Schedule and Tentative Work Session Agendas
IP2 Memorandum from City Clerk: May 12 Special Council Work Session
IP3
Memorandum from Planning and Community Development Assistant Director: Summary
of City Council Direction: Angle Parking on Clinton Street
IP4
Memorandum from Planning and Community Development Assistant Director:
of City Council Direction: Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program
Procedure for Evaluating Changes to Residential On-Street Parking
Summary
and the
IP5 Memorandum from Parks and Recreation Director: Park Tour
IP6 Memorandum from Chief of Police to City Manager: Racial Profiling
IP7 Iowa City Police Department Weekly Bar Check Report - June 9-15
IP8 Letter from Bob Hilton to City Manager: CityNews [staff response included]
IP9 Email to City Clerk from Monica Moen: Request
IP10 Agenda: June 17 -JC Board of Supervisors
IP11 Board and Commission Applications
IP12
FY2000-FY02 Three-Year Financial Plan
Consumer SUrvey on Growth Issues - APril
Home Builders.
[Councilpackets only]
1999 from National Association of
~ Cff~ of
City Council Meeting Schedule and
Tentative Work Session Agendas
06-18-99
IP1
June 18, 1999
]June 28
6:30p
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Monday
counci/ Chambers
[June 29
7:00p
FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday
Counci/ Chambers
I July 5
INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVATION - CITY OFFICES CLOSED
Monday
I July 6
8:00a
SPECIAL FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING
Executive Session - Personnel Evaluations
Tuesday
Council Chambers
I July 12
6:30p
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
6:30p Computer Q & A (Council Only)
Monday
counci/ Chambers
I July 13
7:00p
FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday
Council Chambers
I July 26
6:30p
COUNCIL WORK SESSION
Monday I
Council Chambers
i July 27
7:00p
FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday I
Council Chambers
Hickory Hill West
Animal Microchipping
Circuses and Rodeos
Liquor Licenses
Planning & Zoning Pending List
North Dodge Project IDOT Letter
Meeting dates/times subject to change
FUTURE WORK SESSION ITEMS
Council Goals
Newspaper Vending Machines
Transit Interchange
Commercial Use of Sidewalks
1999/2000 Deer Management Plan
City of Iowa City '-
MEMORANDUM'
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 7, 1999
Mayor and City Council
Marian K. Karr, City Clerk
Spec. Council Work Session, May 12, 1999- 8:00 AM Council Chambers
Council: Champion, Kubby, Lehman, Norton, O'Donnell, Thornberry, Vanderhoef.
Staff: Atkins, Helling, Dilkes, Karr, Craig, Kopping, Yucuis, Rocca, Winkelhake.
Tapes: 99-56, Both Sides; 99-57, Side 1.
A complete transcription is available in the City Clerk's office.
BUDGET OVERVIEW
Library Board President Jesse Singerman read a statement regarding the request for a
November referendum; stated their commitment to building a more efficient building; reported
the intent to raise additional monies to off set additional operating costs; and informed Council
they would be conducting a survey of library users and voters to better understand the results of
the sales tax vote. Council agreed to meet with the Library Board on May 17, 6:30 PM in
Council Chambers.
Meeting adjourned 10:05 a.m.
derk\mins\ws5-12.doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
IP3
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 16, 1999
City Council
Jeff Davidson, Asst. Director, Department of Planning and Community Development
Summary of City Council direction: angle parking on Clinton Street
At your June 14 work session you directed staff to implement angle parking on Clinton Street
between Burlington Street and Iowa Avenue as part of the design of the Phase III downtown
streetscape reconstruction project. You stated the block of Clinton Street between Iowa Avenue
and Jefferson Street should not be added to the project unless the University of Iowa was willing
to fund the expense. I have contacted a University representative, and he indicated that while
the University remains committed to the Iowa Avenue streetscape project, they do not wish to
fund streetscape modifications to the 10 block of North Clinton Street.
The angle parking on Clinton Street will be configured as closely as possible to the sketch plan
that was discussed at your June 14 meeting. We will attempt to save the mature trees shown on
the plan. The situation with underground vaults in the block between Washington Street and
Iowa Avenue will be investigated in more detail as part of the Phase III streetscape design.
cc: Steve Atkins
Joe Fowler
Rob Winstead
Manouchehr Amin
Doug Ripley
Karin Franklin
David Schoon
Rick Fosse
Rob Winstead
jw/mem/jd-clinton .doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 16, 1999
City Council
Jeff Davidson, Asst. Director, Department of Planning and Community Development
Summary of City Council direction: Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program and the
procedure for evaluating changes to residential on-street parking
At your June 14 work session you directed us to make the following modifications to the
Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program and our procedure for evaluating changes to residential
on-street parking.
The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program will clarify that the City Council has the final
determination on implementing all potential traffic calming projects. The neighborhood
survey will be a factor in the City Council's decision making, but will not in itself determine if
a traffic calming measure is implemented. This is not a change in our existing practice, only
a clarification.
Traffic calming measures will be designed to reduce vehicle speeds to the posted speed
limit, but not below the posted speed limit. This may eliminate the use of certain traffic
calming features such as chicanes, which by their design may slow traffic to below the
posted speed limit.
3. The chicanes on Highland Avenue will be modified so that the posted speed limit (25 mph)
can be maintained.
The procedure for evaluating changes to residential on-street parking shall attempt to
ensure that a neighborhood postcard survey is not triggered by the action of a single
individual.
With these modifications, we will continue to work with neighborhood groups that come to us
with requests for neighborhood traffic calming and changes to residential on-street parking.
There was one item I forgot to mention at the June 14 work session. The recently installed traffic
calming devices on Washington Street, College Street, and Highland Avenue were constructed
by City crews at approximately one-half of the projected cost. We had estimated approximately
$12,000 each; total expense for both projects was $12,834. This may alleviate the need to
provide additional funding for the traffic calming program.
cc: Steve Atkins
Karin Franklin
Doug Ripley
Marcia Klingaman
Rick Fosse
jw/mem/jd-calming.doc
CITY OF IOWA CITY
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
' 06-18-99 ~
|P5
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Mayor, Council Members and City Manager
Riverfront & Natural Areas Commission
Terry Trueblood, Parks & Recreation Director
June 14, 1999
Park Tour
On behalf of the Parks and Recreation Commission, I would
like to extend an invitation to join us on the commission's
annual tour of parks and recreation facilities and open
space.
The tour is scheduled for Wednesday, July 14. The
commission will conduct a brief business meeting at 4:00
p.m. in meeting room "B" at the Recreation Center, with the
tour to begin as soon as possible thereafter. Dinner will
be provided, and we hope to conclude the tour no later than
8:00 p.m.
In order
arrangements,
joining us.
it by July 2.
to make proper transportation and meal
we need to know how many people will be
Please complete the enclosed card, and return
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact
encl.
CC:
Parks and Recreation Commission
Comments:
PARKS & RECREATION TOUR
JULY 14, 1999
I will attend.
I will not be able to attend.
NAME:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Steve Atkins, City Manager
R. J. Winkelhake, Chief of Police
RACIAL PROFILING
DATE: June 8, 1999
I have followed the articles in the mass media as well as the national TV
coverage regarding the growing national concerns surrounding racial profiling
and other race based traffic stops.
As you are well aware, this issue has been raised before in Iowa City, and while I
feel confident that officers of the Iowa City Police Department do not engage in
that type of behavior, I believe it is necessary to begin to document the traffic
stop activities of the department. A great deal of resentment can be created if
even a small group of citizens of our community believe that law enforcement is
the enemy.
Whether the concern is real or perceived, it must be addressed as quickly and as
openly as possible. If it is only a perception, that in itself must be addressed as
thoroughly as possible. Since there is no collection of data to show that the Iowa
City Police Department does not engage in activities which could be referred to
as racial profiling, the department will begin an effort to gather the necessary
data to more clearly analyze the practice as it exists.
I will again state as I have in the past, the policy of the Iowa City Police
Department is that motor vehicle stops will be performed professionally and
courteously, with a view towards educating the public about proper driving
procedures, while consistently recognizing and taking the necessary steps to
minimize the dangers involved in this activity for the officer, the motorist, and
other users of the roadway. It is the purpose of the Iowa City Police Department
to establish guidelines for stopping and approaching motorists in a manner that
promotes the safety of the officer and motorist. This policy is in compliance with
the accreditation standards. On many occasions, complaints from citizen's
reference speeding vehicles and reckless driving are brought to the department's
attention as part of the neighborhood concerns for overall neighborhood safety
and these complaints often result in strict traffic enforcement. Enforcement
action is taken to correct the driving behavior of the few to ensure the safety of
the neighborhood and the general motoring public.
To this end I have spoken to Mr. Chuck Wexler, Executive Director of the Police
Executive Research Forum (PERF), and Mr. Robert Stewart, the Executive
Director of the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives
(NOBLE) for their input and insight of this concern.
At the present time the department is reviewing the method in which the data will
be gathered, recorded, and eventually reported. The goal will be to gather the
data in the least intrusive manner possible. The department will use the special
census data from 1996 to demographically evaluate the traffic stop data. I hope
to have the method to gather and record the data in place within the next week
or two. I also will present the method of gathering the data and the purpose for
the gathering of the information to the officers before the implementation date.
The City Attorney will be requested to review the method of gathering and
recording of the data, as well as the reporting of the data to ensure that rights of
all involved in the process are protected.
Iowa City Police Department
Weekly Bar Check Report
June 09-June 15
Bar Name
Weekly total Year to date total
A B A B
1 ST AV CLUB
AIR L IN E R
BREWERY
BO JAMES
CARLOS O'KELLYS
CHAUNCEYS
COLONIAL LANES
DAVES FOXHEAD
DEADWOOD
DIAMOND DAVES
DUBLIN UNDERGROUND
EAGLES LODGE
FIELDHOUSE
FITZPATRICKS
GA MALON ES
GABES
GIOVANNIS
GREEN ROOM
GRINCOS
GRIzzLEYs
GROUND ROUND
HAPPY JOES
HIGHLANDER INN
HILLTO P TAP
JIMMY'S BISTRO
J IRSAS
JOES PLACE
KEGLER
50 !~!~!i~ 21
...............
.......
67 :!!i
..........124
17 6
......
lo !!!!!!i{i5
18 ii!!!ieii0
17 5
o iii!!!i!o
88 ~e~z!i!188
34 10
35 ~:i.=,.,3
10 i!;i'!'!"~ii'i0
29 !i;=!:e:~i!i!:[15
4 ::~::~::~::~?O
:::
7 i~i~=~ 10
.......
Arrest/Visit
YTD
0
0.42
0.00
1.85
0
0.35
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.14
0.74
0.29
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.52
0.67
0.05
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
1.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Column A is the number of times a bar is visited specifically checking for underage drinkers.
Column B is the number of people charged with possession under the legal age in each bar. Note this is not the
total number of charges in each bar.
Iowa City Police Department
Weekly Bar Check Report
June 09-June 15
Bar Name
Weekly total Year to date total
A B A B
KITTY HAWK 0 0 10 0
MABELS 0 0 10 0
MARTINIS 0 0 16 11
MAXIES 0 0 42 0
MEMORIES 0 0 16 0
MICKEYS 2 0 28 4
MIKES 1 0 13 5
MILL 0 0 3 0
MONDO'S 0 0 4 1
MOOSE LODGE 0 0 2 0
MUMMS 0 0 10 1
ONE EYED JAKES 3 7 47 79
OUTER LIMITS 0 0 12 0
PLAMOR 0 0 9 2
QUE 2 0 50 48
QUINTINS BAR &DELl 1 0 22 0
ROXIES 0 0 8 0
RT GRUNTS 0 0 16 5
RUSH HOUR 2 1 57 22
SAMS 1 0 7 0
SANCTUARY 1 0 7 0
SPORTS COLUMN 4 5 83 307
THE CELLAR 0 0 0 0
TUCKS 0 0 11 0
UNION 3 5 75 218
VFW 0 0 2 0
VINE 1 0 19 2
V~TOS 2 0 40 73
WIG AND PEN 0 0 6 0
TOTAL 40 33 1153 1187
Arrest/Visit
YTD
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.38
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.10
1.68
0.00
0.22
0.96
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.39
0.00
0.00
3.70
0.00
0.00
2.91
0.00
0.11
1.83
0.00
1.03
Column A is the number of times a bar is visited specifically checking for underage drinkers.
Column B is the number of people charged with possession under the legal age in each bar.
total number of charges in each bar.
Note this is not the
06-18-99
IP8
,~JUN 1 ~ 1999
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
602 Dearborn
Iowa City, IA 52240
June 13, 1999
City Manager's Office
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
Person concerned:
I hope you won't mind a favorable comment: Citynews, in my view, is a
good idea well executed. If I'm paying for it, I'm getting my money's
worth. If you were to make it a monthly, I would say more is better.
Sincerely,
Bob Hilton
June 15, 1999
Mr. Bob Hilton
602 Dearborn
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Mr. Hilton:
Thank you for your kind comments regarding CityNews. I will pass along
your note to Barb Coffey who compiles the newsletter.
It is difficult to include timely topics in CityNews as it is distributed over a
period of several weeks. In an effort to provide current information to our
citizens, the City will provide a monthly section in the Community News
(formerly known as the Advertiser). Look for "Iowa City Insights" the first
Wednesday of each month starting in July.
Please feel free to call me if there are any topics you would like to see
covered.
Administrative Assistant
to the City Manager
c: City Council
Barb Coffey
410 EAST WAStlINGTON STREET * IOx3'A ('II'Y, IOWA 52240-1826 ' (319[ 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-5009
06/16/99 11:22 '~208 345 3514 EVANS KEANE ~ 002/002
Monica Moen
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Monica Meen [ekmonica@micron.net]
Tuesday, June 15, 1999 8:27 AM
'marian_karr@iowacity.org'
°mmoen@uiowa .campuscwix.net'
FW: Council Agenda Item - June 29 meeting
..... Original Message-----
From: MenIce Moon [malltQ:ekrrlonica~,,rnlcCoru~et]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 9:57 Ar~
To: 'marion karr~iowacih/,org'
Cc: 'mmoe~'{~iowa.campuscw~.ner
Subject: Council Ageride Item - June 29 meeting
Hi Marian l
Marc and I would like the opportunity to speak with the Council at its June 29 meeting. Here is proposed
language for the agenda:
The owners of the former Whiteway Building are contemplating building a new commercial and residential
structure at 210-21 iS South Clinton Street, the site of the former Whiteway Building that was destroyed by life on March
26, 1999. The Moons request consideration of a proposal for phasing in the increase in property taxes that will occur as a
result of construction of a new building on the site. The Moens request an incremental phase-in o1' 20 percent of the
increase in the assessed value of the property value over a five year period. That is, once the competed building is
assessed, the increase over the January 1999 assessment would be paid in an increment of 20 percent the first year, 40
percent the second year, etc.. so that at the end of the fifth year. the increase in the property taxes would be fully phased
in. Since only the increase in assessed value would be subject to the phase-in. there would be no loss, but only gain, in
revenue to the City, The 1999 assessment on the former building (excluding land) was $580, 980. The building which
the Moons propose te construct would be well in excess of a four-fold increase in the 1999 assessed value of the former
Whiteway Building. To accomplish this, the Moons need assistance in the form of the proposed property tax phase-in.
Please let either Marc or me know if you need additional information. Marc's phone number is 351-3900 and my
daytime number is (208) 384-1800. I will let either you or Sue know ahead of time if we will be needing any special
equipment for the meeting. I'1[ stop in the office on Monday. June 28 to say hello. I hope all is well. I look forward to
seeing you.
0e/16/99 11:21 8208 345 3514 EVANS KEANE ~001/002
EVANS, K.EANE
Boise Oilice Affonteys at Lmv
Member, C-nmlerclal Law AfliliMt,:/
With Imlependent I;irn~ in
Principal Citle-~ W,,rhlwldc,
i I{)l W. RIver Street, S¢lit~ 2411|
P.O. Box 959
Boise, Tdaho g374}1-0959
FACSIMILE COVER SHEET
CONFI'DENTIALITY NOTICE
'rc'lephone: (21)9) 3S4-1 ~Jfil)
Faeallnlle: (2flf~) 345-3514
E,-mslil: ekidalaw(.~l~ilcrull.ttl:t
%Vebsite: http:lt~ww.t, kid~daw,com
Zhis facvimile /rcmm~ission (and/or the documents accontpanyh'~g it,) may conlain
cof.tfidential infi,'mation helongi,g to the sender, which is protecled by the attonzey-client
privilege. The it.~formation is intended only for lhe use of the h~dividual or entity named below.
If you are not the rotended recipient, you are hereby notified that any discio.vure, copying,
distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this inJbrmation is strictly
prohibited If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notO~ us by
telepho, e to arrange for return e~ the doe, moots.
Operator Name: Tommy
From: 'Monica Moon
T__o: Marion Karr
Facsimile No.: (319) 356-5009
Company: Iowa City City Clerk
Date: June 16, 1999
Documents Transmitted: Proposed Language for June 29 Council Agenda Item
Follows Via Courier:
Original: Will Not Follow: X Follows Via Mail:
This message consists of two (2) pages, including this cover page. 'Please check to see if
you received the cmTect number of pages; if not, kindly contact us immediately either by return
facsimile or by telephone.
File Name: M. Moen
File No.: 0-63
Comments: Thanks for your help. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call either Marc (351-3900) or me (208-384-1 gO0). I look forward to seeing you soon.
B6/]6/99 BB;34:57 319-354-qZ13
-> +3193565889 IOW~ CITV CLERR
06-18-99
IPIO
Johnson Counly
__ ]~ IOWA ~
Jonathan Jordahl, Chair
Charles D. Duffy
Michael E. Lehman
Sally Stutsman
Carol Thompson
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Agenda
Boardroom - 2"d Floor
Johnson County Administration Building
913 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
June 17, 1999
FORMAL MEETING
Agenda
1. Call to order 9:00 a.m.
2. Action re:
3. Action re:
claims
formal minutes of June 10th
Action re: payroll authorizations
Business from the County Auditor
a) Action re: permits
b) Action re: reports
c) Other
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-60136
8fi/lfi/99 88:95:19 ~19-~54-4213 -> +~19~565889 IOUA CITY CLERK Page 082
Agenda 6-17-99
Page 2
6- Business from the Planning and Zoning Administrator
a) Final consideration of application Z9915 of William
Wood.
b) Final consideration of application Z9916 of Steve Michel.
c) Final consideration of the following Amendments:
and Jennifer
1. Amendments to the Johnson County Zoning Ordinance enacting
additional provisions to Chapters 8:1.5.1, 8:1.23.1.1, 8:1.23.1.4,
8:1.24.1.1, 8:1.24.111.1, 8:1.24 111.8, 8:1.25.1, 8:l.27.IV.A. 8:1.27.
IV.B, 8:1.33.II. la, 8:1.33.II. lb, 8:1.33.11I. la, 8:l.33.gl. lb,
8: 1.34.II.H.2e, and by repealing ordinances and parts of ordinances
in conflict herewith
Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to further the stated
purpose of the zoning ordinance by amending Chapter 8: 1.5.1,
8:1.23.I. 1, 8:1.23.1.4, 8:1.24.1.1, 8:1.24.1II. 1, 8:1.24.1II.8, 8:1.25.1,
8:l.27.IV.A, 8:l.27.IV.B, 8:1.33.1I. la, 8:1.33.I1.1b, 8:1.33.1II. la,
8:1.33.1II. lb, 8:l.34.II.H.2e, by adding provisions for RS-20 and
CH-F zoning classifications.
Amendments.
Chapter 8: 1.5.1, Districts and Boundaries Thereof, by
including new language as follows; RS20 - Suburban
Residential.
Amendment. Chapter 8:1.23 .I. 1, Height Regulations, by including
new- language as follows; RS20.
Amendment. Chapter 8:1.23.1.4, Height Regulations, by including
new language as follows; CH-F.
Amendment. Chapter 8: 1.24.1.1, Yard Regulations, by including new
language as follows; CH-F, 40 feet, none, none, RS20,
40 feet, 10 feet, 50 feet.
Amendment. Chapter 8: 1.24.111.1, Yard Regulations, by including
new language as follows; RS20.
Amendment. Chapter 8:1.24.rli. 8, Yard Regulations, by including
new language as follows; RS20 and CH-F.
Amendment. Chapter 8:1.25.1, Area Regulations, by including new
language as follows; CH-F, Residential Uses Prohibited
Except for On-Site Management and t~e. ir Family;
RS20, 100 feet, 20 acres, 20 acres *, * 52
(Continuation of Planning and Zoning Administrator agenda'items)
Section I.
Section I2[.
Amendment.
86/16/99 88:3G:88 319-354-4213 -> +3193S6S809 IOO~ CITV CLgRH Page 883
Agenda 6-17-99
Page 3
d)
Chapter 8:l.27.IV.A, Sign Regulations, by including
new language as follows; RS20.
Chapter 8:l.27.IV.B, Sign Regulations, by including
new language as follows; CH-F.
Chapter 8:1.33 .II. la, Applications, by including new
language as follows; RS20.
Chapter 8:1.33.1I. lb, Applications, by including new
language as follows; CH-F.
Chapter 8:1.33.III. la, Applications, by including new
language as follows; RS20.
Chapter 8: 1.33.111. lb, Applications, by including new
language as follows; CH-F.
Chapter 8:l.34.II.H.2e, Conditional Use Permit.s, by
including new language as follows; RS20.
Amendment.
Amendment.
Amendment.
Amendment.
Amendment.
Amendment.
Amendment.
Motion setting public hearing for various zonings and plattings,
Other
7. Business from the County Attorney
a) Other
8. Business from the Board of Supervisors
FY 2000 Nutrition Contract with Heritage
Heritage Area Agency on Aging Contract with
Fiscal Agent Agreement for Empowerment
Sub-Lease with the State of Iowa Department of
a) Discussion/action re:
Agency on Aging.
b) Discussion/action re:
S.E.A.T.S.
c) Discussion/action re:
Grant.
d) Discussion/action re:
Human Services.
e)
Discussion/action regarding the following county benefits:
1. Adoption Agreement for Flexible Benefits Plan for Employees of
Johnson County.
2. Flexible Benefits Plan Summary Exhibit A re: Administrative
Services Cost.
3. Long Term Disability premiums.
(Continuation of Board of Supervisors agenda items)
86116/99 88:36:34 319-354-4Z13 -> +3193565889 IOO~ CITV CLERH Page 884
Agenda 6-17-99
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
o)
p)
q)
Page 4
Motion to re-appoint William Kelly to the Johnson County Task Force
of the Heritage Area Agency on Aging for a term ending June 30, 2000.
Discussion/action re: resolution increasing county matching funds for
Mitigation Relocation of Citizens from County Floodways.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-T1 transferring from the
Reservoir Roads Trust Fund to the Secondary Roads Fund.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-T2 transferring from the
General Basic Fund to the Conservation Trust Fund.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-T3 transferring from the
Rural Capital Projects Fund to the Rural Basic Fund.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-T4 transferring from the
General Basic Fund to the Capital Projects Fund.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-T5 transferring from the
General Supplemental Fund to the Capital Projects Fund.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-T6 transferring from the
General Basic Fund to the Capital Expenditures Fund.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-T7 transferring from the
General Supplemental Fund to the Capital Expenditures Fund.
Discussion/action re: Resolution 6-17-99-B1 FY '99 Appropriation
Changes to County Attorney (Dept. 02), County Sheriff (Dept. 08), and
Court Services (Dept. 28).
Discussion/action re: Board of Supervisors summer meeting schedule
(possibility of canceling meetings for the weeks of July 26th and August
16th).
Discussion/action re: fireworks permits.
Other
9. Adjourn to informal meeting
a) Reports and inquiries from the County Attorney
b) Inquiries and reports from the public
c) Reports and inquiries from the members of the Board of Supervisors
d) Other
10. Adjournment
06-18-99
IPll
Spouses and relatives of City Council Members and members of comparable County
Boards and Commissions are not eligible for appointment to City Boards and
Commissions. This includes: spouse, child, mother, father, mother- in- law, father-
in- law, brother, sister, brother- in- law, sister- in- law, step-father, step-mother,
step-child, aunt, or uncle. (Resolution 85-354)
Males: 2
Females: 4
June 29, 1999
BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES
One vacancy - Unexpired Term
June 29, 1999 July 1, 2003
Shaner Magalhaes []
1945 Grantwood Street
David Van Dusseldorp
2646 concord Circle
AS OF NOON JUNE 17, 1999
[] Denotes applicant completed the Confidential page of the application.
CITY'OF IOWA CITY
ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION
I .' PLICATION FORM
Individuals serving on Boards/Commissions play an important role in advising the Council on m~tters of interest
to our community and its future. Applicants must reside in Iowa City.
After a vacancy has been announced, the Council reviews all applications during the work session. The
appointment is made at the next formal Council meeting. Appointees serve as unpaid volunteers.
PLEASE USE A BLACK INK PEN. Return the application to City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City,
Iowa. ,
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT AND AS SUCH CAN BE REPRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED FOR
THE PUBLIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE LAST PAGE MARKED "CONFIDENTIAL' THIS APPLICATION WILL
BE CONSIDERED FOR THREE MONTHS ONLY AND AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDERED FOR ANY VACANCY
DURING THAT TIME.
ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION NAME
NAME .-,,('HA/vIE&/14/t
Is your home address (listed above) within the corporate limits of Iowa City?
H~ , long have you been a resident of Iowa City? I0
PHONE NUMBER: HOME
HOME ADDRESS ]?Yf' ~R.44Jf'/4/a ~ Z> Jr /"Yes No
EMPLOYER
BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH YOU FEEL QUALIFY YOU FOR THIS POSITION:
WHAT IS YOUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THIS ADVISORY BOARD?
WHAT CONTRIBUTIONS DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN MAKE TO THIS ADVISORY BOARD (OR STATE REASON
SPECIFIC ATTENTION SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. PLEASE LIST ANY
PRESENT AFFILIATIONS YOU HAVE WITH AGENCIES WHICH MAY APPLY FOR FUNDING FROM THE CITY.
AFFILIATION MEANS BEING A BOARD MEMBER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE AGENCY. OTHER TYPES OF
AFFILIATION MUST BE EXAMINED ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT SECTION 362.5 OF THE CODE OF IOWA GENERALLY PROHIBITS, WITH CERTAIN
IMPORTANT EXCPETIONS, A MEMBER OF A CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION FROM HAVING AN INTEREST IN A
CITY CONTRACT. A COPY OF SECTION 362.5 IS ATTACHED. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE
CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY' S OFFICE AT 356-5030. '
IF YOU ARE UNCERTAIN WHETHER OR NOT A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS, PLEASE LIST THE
AGENCY AND THEN CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
IF YOU ARE NOT SELECTED, DO YOU WANT TO BE NOTIFIED? v/YES __NO
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON ANOTHER IOWA CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION?
YES I~NO
(It has been Council policy not to permit an individual to serve on two Boards or Commissions at the same time.)
Misrepresentations on this application will constitute just cause for removal of an appointee.
If you fail to answer all questions on the application you may not be considered for appointment.
, ,:lerk~bdcomapp.doc
January 1998
CITY OF IOWA CITY
ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION
A nPLICATION FORM
Individuals serving on Boards/Commissions play an important role in advising the Council on matters of interest
to our community and its future. Applicants must reside in Iowa City.
After a vacancy has been announced, the Council reviews all applications during the work session. The
appointment is made at the next formal Council meeting. Appointees serve as unpaid volunteers.
PLEASE USE A BLACK INK PEN. Return the application to City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City,
Iowa.
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT AND AS SUCH CAN BE REPRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED FORTHE
PUBLIC. THIS APPLICATION WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR THREE MONTHS ONLY AND AUTOMATICALLY
CONSIDERED FOR ANY VACANCY DURING THAT TIME.
ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION NAME fluSctc ~8~x;l~ ~:~0 or--7~t,~/-~E'5 TERM
/~
NAME ~u,h ~ ~5~P HOMEADDRESS ~ C~D ~~ ~>~
Is your home address (listed above) within the corporate limits of Iowa City? ~ Yes ~ No
OCCUPATION ~o~r~ ~~ EMPLOYER ~./- ~Nf~
PHONE NUMBER: HOME ~37-~700 BUSINESS
EXPERIENCE AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH YOU FEEL QUALIFY YOU FOR THIS POSITION:
WHAT IS YOUR'PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THIS ADVISORY BOARD? -/~E J~a/~
WHAT CONTRIBUTIONS DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN MAKE TO THIS ADVISORY BOARD (OR STATE REASON FOR
APPLYING)? Z /~~ ~ ~F~ 4 ~/~r e~ ~/~ ~r
SPECIFIC ATTENTION SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO A POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. PLEASE LIST ANY
PRESENT AFFILIATIONS YOU HAVE WITH AGENCIES WHICH MAY APPLY FOR FUNDING FROM THE CITY.
AFFILIATION MEANS BEING A BOARD MEMBER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE AGENCY. OTHER TYPES OF
AFFILIATION MUST BE EXAMINED ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
IF YOU ARE UNCERTAIN WHETHER OR NOT A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXISTS, PLEASE LIST THE
AGENCY AND THEN CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
IF YOU ARE NOT SELECTED, DO YOU WANT TO BE NOTIFIED? ~ YES __NO
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON ANOTHER IOWA CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION? __YES >~ NO
(It has been Council policy not to permit an individual to serve on ~wo Boards or Commissions at the same time.)
cclerk\bdcomal~p.l~o AUgUSt 1996
Spouses and relatives of City Council Members and members of comparable County
Boards and Commissions are not eligible for appointment to City Boards and
Commissions. This includes: spouse, child, mother, father, mother- in- law, father-
in- law, brother, sister, brother- in- law, sister- in- law, step-father, step-mother,
step-child, aunt, or uncle. (Resolution 85-354)
Males: 2
Females: 2
June 29, 1999
POLICE CITIZENS' REVIEW BOARD
One Vacancy - Unexpired Term
May 18, 1999 - September 1, 2000
John R. Stratton []
815 Wylde Green Road
James Clayton []
3059 Prairie du Chien Road NE (not in the City Limits)
John Robertson []
915 Oakcrest #12
Jeff M. Gillitzer []
911 Highland Avenue
AS OF NOON JUNE 17, 1999
[] Denotes applicant completed the Confidential page of the application.
CITY OF IOWA CITY
POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD
PPLICATION FORM
Individuals serving on Boards/Commissions play an important role in advising the Co fl m~tters of interest
Uric on
to our community and its future. Applicants must reside in Iowa City. However, the t~ty Council reserves the
right to waive the residency requirement for good cause shown.
After a vacancy has been announced, the Council reviews all applications during the work session. The
appointment is made at the next formal Council meeting. Appointees serve as unpaid volunteers.
PLEASE USE A BLACK INK PEN. Return the application to City Clerk, 41 0 E. Washington St., Iowa City,
Iowa.
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT AND AS SUCH CAN BE REPRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED FOR
THE PUBLIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE LAST PAGE MARKED "CONFIDENTIAL", THIS APPLICATION WILL
BE CONSIDERED FOR THREE MONTHS ONLY AND AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDERED FOR ANY VACANCY
DURING THAT TIME.
13 v~ ~e,'~,~ ~ ~,'~:~
NAME~44'KV[ d"t('~ZtF HOMEADDRESS
I ~ur home address (listed above) within the corporate limits of Iowa City? X Yes __ No
How long have you been a resident of Iowa City? 19el i ~ i ~9~2 ~
OCCUPATION ~' Sk~ ~(7~+ EMPLOYERUI,NC
~ 3 ~ ~ ~ I ~ BUSINESS
PHONE NUMBER: HOME ~
EXPERIENCE AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH YOU FEEL QUALIFY YOU FOR THIS POSITION:
PCRB
Page 2
ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A "PEACE OFFICER" AS DEFINED IN IOWA CODE SECTION 801.4(11)
(,qcE BELOW). IF SO, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE POSITION(S), THE DATES YOU HELD THE POSITION(S), A BRIEF
L ,CRIPTION OF YOUR DUTIES IN THE POSITION(S) AND THE REASON YOU LEFT THE POSITION(S).
"Peace officers", sometimes designated "law enforcement officers", include:
a. Sheriffs and their regular deputies who are subject to mandated law enforce-
ment training.
b. Marshals and police officers of cities.
c. Peace officer members of the department of public safety as defined in
chapter 80.
d. Parole officers acting pursuant to section 906.2.
e. Probation officers acting pursuant to section 602.7202, subsection 4, and
section 907.2.
f. Special security officers employed by board of regents institutions as set forth
in section 262.13.
g. Conservation officers as authorized by section 456A. 13.
h. Such employees of the department of transportation as are designated "peace
officers" by resolution of the department under section 321.477.
i. Employees of an aviation authority designated as "peace officers" by the
authority under section 330A.8, subsection 16.
j. Such persons as may be otherwise so designated by law.
I
(.i ;
L -:: '-
WHAT IS YOUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THIS ADVISORY BOARDr////t, i/~l a~,-~C ~
~ e. ~ ~,~ ~,: . .~ ~.~ ~c,~ ~, z~ ~, s.~ ~.-~ , ~~ '~p7~7,.~
WHAT C~NTRIBUTIONS~O YOU FEEL YOU CAN MAKE TO THIS ADVISORY BOARD (OR STATE REASON FOR"
PCRB
Page 3
CuNFLICT OF INTEREST
IF YOU THINK A CONFLICT OF INTEREST MAY EXIST BETWEEN OTHER ACTIVITIES IN
ENGAGED AND YOUR POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT TO PCRB, PLEASE DESCRIBE BELOW
CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
iJ-q-,--s ;r'.
WHICH YOU ARE
AND THEN CAN
IF YOU ARE NOT SELECTED, DO YOU WANT TO BE NOTIFIED? _~YES
NO
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON ANOTHER IOWA CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION? XYES
NO
(It has been Council policy not to permit an individual to serve on two Boards or Commissions at the same time,)
Misrepresentations on this application will constitute just cause for removal of an appointee.
If you fail to answer all questions on the application you may not be considered for appointment.
cclerk~polctapp,doc
July 1997
CITY OF IOWA CITY
POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD
APPLICATION FORM
Individuals serving on Boards/Commissions play an important role in advising the Council on matters of interest
to our community and its future. Applicants must reside in Iowa City. However, the City Council reserves the
right to waive the residency requirement for good cause shown.
After a vacancy has been announced, the Council reviews all applications during the work session. The
appointment is made at the next formal Council meeting. Appointees serve as unpaid volunteers.
PLEASE USE A BLACK INK PEN. Return the application to City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City,
Iowa.
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT AND AS SUCH CAN BE REPRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED FOR
THE PUBLIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE LAST PAGE MARKED "CONFIDENTIAL", THIS APPLICATION WILL
BE CONSIDERED FOR THREE MONTHS ONLY AND AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDERED FOR ANY VACANCY
DURING THAT TIME.
ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION NAME , .PCRB
NAMEJohn Robertson HOME ADDRESS
IS your home address (listed above) within the corporate limits of Iowa City?
How long have you been a resident of Iowa City?
OCCUPATION Attorney
PHONE NUMBER: HOME
91 5 Oakcrest #12
X Yes
7 Years
EMPLOYER
BUSINESS
TERM unexpired term
Iowa City IA
52246
No
Linn County Advocate
319-398-3535
EXPERIENCE AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH YOU FEEL QUALIFY YOU FOR THIS POSITION:
see attache~
PCRB
Page 2
ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A "PEACE OFFICER" AS DEFINED IN IOWA CODE SECTION 801.4(11)
(' ~. BELOW). IF SO, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE POSITION(S), THE DATES YOU HELD THE POSITION(S), A BRIEF
Dc,~CRIPTION OF YOUR DUTIES IN THE POSITION(S) AND THE REASON YOU LEFT THE POSITION(S).
"Peace officers", sometimes designated "law enforcement officers", include:
a. Sheriffs and their regular deputies who are subject to mandated law enforce-
ment training.
b. Marshals and police officers of cities.
c. Peace officer members of the department of public safety as defined in
chapter 80.
d. Parole officers acting pursuant to section 906.2.
e. Probation officers acting pursuant to section 602.7202, subsection 4, and
section 907.2.
f. Special security officers employed by board of regents institutions as set forth
in section 262.13.
g. Conservation officers as authorized by section 456A. 13,
h. Such employees of the department of transportation as are designated "peace
officers" by resolution of the department under section 321.477.
i, Employees of an aviation authority designated as "peace officers" by the
authority under section 330A.8, subsection 16.
j. Such persons as may be otherwise so designated by law.
see attached
WHAT IS YOUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THIS ADVISORY BOARD?
see attached
WHAT CONTRIBUTIONS DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN MAKE TO THIS ADVISORY BOARD(OR STATE REASON FOR
APPLYING)?
see attached
PCRB
Page 3
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
IF YOU THINK A CONFLICT OF INTEREST MAY EXIST BETWEEN OTHER ACTIVITIES IN WHICH YOU ARE
ENGAGED AND YOUR POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT TO PCRB, PLEASE DESCRIBE BELOW AND THEN CAN
CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
attached
IF YOU ARE NOT SELECTED, DO YOU WANT TO BE NOTIFIED? x YES NO
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON ANOTHER IOWA CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION? __.YES x NO
(It has been Council policy not to permit an individual to serve on two Boards or Commissions at the same time.)
Misrepresentations on this application will constitute just cause for removal of an appointee.
If you fail to answer all questions on the application you may not be considered for appointment.
cclerk~polctapp.doc
July 1997
I O ', :'A C j'i' ','. l r.} '.
John Robertson
Attorney at Law
209 East Washington, Suite 303
Iowa City Iowa 52240
Phone 319 338 9852
Fax 319 351 8312
email jroberts@inav. net
June 1, 1999
City Clerk
City of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
RE: PCRB Application
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Please find enclosed my completed application to serve on the Police Citizens Review
Board. I ask that Council review it favorably and appoint me to the present vacancy.
I have worked within the criminal justice system since 1979. Until 1989, I was a social
worker and juvenile justice staff member, primarily with the Missouri Division of Youth Services.
Them, and as a part of my regular duties, I interacted with law enforcement and Court personnel on
a routine basis. In 1990 1 returned to school and earned both a Masters Degree and a Juris
Doctorate. Following graduation, I was the Associate Director of the National Maternal and Child
Health Resource Center at the University of Iowa. In 1994 1 began a full time law practice in Iowa
City. In February, 1999 1 accepted a position with the Linn County Advocate representing indigent
criminal defendants. In addition, since 1994 1 have been an instructor at Mount Mercy College in
the Criminal Justice Department. There, I teach criminal investigations and criminal evidence to
students seeking careers in law enforcement.
As an attorney, I come into regular contact with police officers and am very familiar with the
issues and events they regularly encounter in the performance of their duties. Likewise, I am
routinely exposed to treatment private citizens receive from law enforcement. While the vast
majority of those experiences by all accounts are not problematic, on occasion a client or witness
(or another officer) will provide a credible report that entails potentially unprofessional law
enforcement conduct. In all of this I believe I am able to exercise the kind of critical judgment
necessary to properly evaluate the allegations and facts and determine where truth lies.
More important, I support without reservation the purposes of the PCRB and the idea of
citizen oversight to law enforcement. Such an entity serves as a resource both for the community
and the police and can function as a trusted resource for a locality such as ours.
In any event, I seek appointment to the Board, and ask that you give this application serious
consideration. I may be reached at home at 354-9554 and at work, 319-398-3535 if you have any
questions or comments.
J~~O n
EXPERIENCE OR ACTIVITIES WHICH YOU FEEL QUALIFY YOU FOR THIS
POSITION:
I have worked in and around the criminal justice system since 1979. From then until 1989 1 worked
in the juvenile justice field, primarily as a program manager with the Missouri Division of Youth
Services. In 1993 (after completing law school) I worked for the National Matemal and Child
Health Resource Center at the College of Law. In 1994 1 entered private practice in Iowa City,
where I represented criminal defendants and juveniles (as well as others) in a general law practice.
In February, 1999 1 suspended my private practice and joined the Linn County Advocate, where I
represent persons accused of crimes in that county exclusively. I also teach Criminal Investigations
and Criminal Evidence at Mount Mercy College. I have served on numerous Boards and
Committees over the years.
ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A "PEACE OFFICER"?
No.
WHAT IS YOUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THE ADVISORY BOARD?
My understanding is that the Advisory Board investigates complaints made by citizens against
officers in the Iowa City Police Department, develops findings of fact, and where appropriate
recommends remedies to the Chief of Police. The Board also makes policy recommendations to
City Council.
WHAT CONTRIBUTIONS DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN MAKE TO THIS ADVISORY
BOARD?
Because of my close association with law enforcement over the years, I believe I possess an
accurate and detailed understanding of the profession. Because of my work in recent years
representing clients accused of crimes, I also understand the experiences of persons confronted by
police. Because of my work as a teacher, I understand the ideals and realities of law enforcement.
All of this, I hope, would combine to allow me to participate actively and constmctively in the
activities of the Board.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
I envision no conflicts at this time.
CITY OF IOWA CITY
POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD
APPLICATION FORM
Individuals serving on Boards/Commissions play an important role in advising the Council on matters of interest
to our community and its future. Applicants must reside in Iowa City. However, the City Council reserves the
right to waive the residency requirement for good cause shown.
After a vacancy has been announced, the Council reviews all applications during the work session. The
appointment is made at the next formal Council meeting. Appointees serve as unpaid volunteers.
PLEASE USE A BLACK INK PEN. Return the application to City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City,
Iowa.
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT AND AS SUCH CAN BE REPRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED FOR
THE PUBLIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE LAST PAGE MARKED "CONFIDENTIAL", THIS APPLICATION WILL
BE CONSIDERED FOR THREE MONTHS ONLY AND AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDERED FOR ANY VACANCY
DURING THAT TIME.
Is ~our home address (listed above) within the corporate limits of Iowa City? ~ Yes ~ No
How long have you been a resident of Iowa City? / ~ ~ t~
OCCUPATION ~ ~ 8 ~ - EMPLOYER
EXPERIENCE AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH YOU FEEL QUALIFY YOU FOR THIS POSITION:
PCRB
Page 2
ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A "PEACE OFFICER" AS DEFINED IN IOWA CODE SECTION 801.4(11)
(r -. BELOW). IF SO, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE POSITION(S), THE DATES YOU HELD THE POSITION(S), A BRIEF
DL~CRIPTION OF YOUR DUTIES IN THE POSITION(S) AND THE REASON YOU LEFT THE POSITION(S).
"Peace officers", sometimes designated "law enforcement officers", include:
a. Sheriffs and their regular deputies who are subject to mandated law enforce-
ment training.
b. Marshals and police officers of cities.
c. Peace officer members of the department of public safety as defined in
chapter 80.
d. Parole officers acting pursuant to section 906.2.
e. Probation officers acting pursuant to section 602.7202, subsection 4, and
section 907.2.
f. Special security officers employed by board of regents institutions as set forth
in section 262.13.
g. Conservation officers as authorized by section 456A. 13.
h. Such employees of the department of transportation as are designated '~eace
officers" by resolution of the department under section 321.477.
i. Employees of an aviation authority designated as ~peace officers" by the
authority under section 330A.8, subsection 16.
j. Such persons as may be otherwise so designated by law.
WHAT I YOUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THIS ADVISORY BOARD7 ,/~/2~/,/(~C, tb 2/~'~-
PCRB
Page 3
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
IF YOU THINK A CONFLICT OF INTEREST MAY EXIST BETWEEN OTHER ACTIVITIES IN WHICH YOU ARE
ENGAGED AND YOUR POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT TO PCRB, PLEASE DESCRIBE BELOW AND THEN CAN
CONTACT THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
IF YOU ARE NOT SELECTED, DO YOU WANT TO BE NOTIFIED? .z~YES __NO
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON ANOTHER IOWA CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION? YES ,~__NO
(It has been Council policy not to permit an individual to serve on two Boards or Commissions at the same time.)
Misrepresentations on this application will constitute just cause for removal of an appointee.
If you fail to answer all questions on the application you may not be considered for appointment.
cclerk~oolctapp.doc
July 1997
CITY OF IOWA CITY
POLICE CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD
APPLICATION FORM
Individuals serving on Boards/Commissions play an important role in advising the Council on matters of interest
to our community and its future. Applicants must reside in Iowa City. However, the City Council reserves the
right to waive the residency requirement for good cause shown.
After a vacancy has been announced, the Council reviews all applications during the work session. The
appointment is made at the next formal Council meeting. Appointees serve as unpaid volunteers.
PLEASE USE A BLACK INK PEN. Return the application to City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City,
Iowa.
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT AND AS SUCH CAN BE REPRODUCED AND DISTRIBUTED FOR
THE PUBLIC, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE LAST PAGE MARKED "CONFIDENTIAL", THIS APPLICATION WILL
BE CONSIDERED FOR THREE MONTHS ONLY AND AUTOMATICALLY CONSIDERED FOR ANY VACANCY
DURING THAT TIME.
ADVISORY BOARD/COMMISSION NAME
Is your home address (listed above) within the corporate limits of Iowa City?
How long have you been a resident of Iowa City? ~ Z ~ (~ ~
OCCUPATION S 8 C~O ~l~c) ,'~q ~f EMPLOYER
PHONE NUMBER: HOME ~- ~ 5 ~' -- & 10 f BUSINESS
HOME ADDRESS S"' / '~ Cd ;y (/~L ~ /~J
X_ Yes __ No
U & ;' de,,r-5 ; 'lL}/ ~
3 / q - z,~,9' -.2, q f F
EXPERIENCE AND/OR ACTIVITIES WHICH YOU FEEL QUALIFY YOU FOR THIS POSITION:
PCRB
Page 2
ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A "PEACE OFFICER" AS DEFINED IN IOWA CODE SECTION 801.4(11)
(SEE BELOW). IF SO, PLEASE IDENTIFY THE POSITION(S), THE DATES YOU HELD THE POSITION(S), A BRIEF
DESCRIPTION OF YOUR DUTIES IN THE POSITION(S) AND THE REASON YOU LEFT THE POSITION(S).
"Peace officers", sometimes designated "law enforcement officers", include:
a. Sheriffs and their regular deputies who are subject to mandated law enforce-
ment training. "
b. Marshals and police officers of cities.
c. Peace officer members of the department of public safety as defined in
chapter 80. :
d. Parole officers acting pursuant to section 906.2.
e. Probation officers acting pursuant to section 602.7202, subsection 4, and
section 907.2.
f. Special security officers employed by board of resents institutions as set forth
in section 262.13.
g. Conservation officers as authorized by section 456A. 13.
h. Such employees of the department of transportation as are designated "peace
officers" by resolution of the department under section 321.477.
i. Employees of an aviation authority designated as "peace officers" by the
j.
authority under section 330A.8, subsection 16.
Such persons as may be otherwise so designated by law.
WHAT IS YOUR PRESENT KNOWLEDGE OF THIS ADVISORY BOARD?
WHAT CONTRIBUTIONS DO YOU FEEL YOU CAN MAKE TO THIS ADVISORY BOARD (OR STATE REASON FOR
PCRB
Page 3
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
IF YOU THINK A CONFLICT OF
ENGAGED AND YOUR POSSIBLE
CONTACT THE CITY ATTO~{N~~FFIC, E.
INTEREST MAY EXIST BETWEEN OTHER ACTIVITIES IN WHICH YOU ARE
APPOINTMENT TO PCRB, PLEASE DESCRIBE BELOW AND THEN CAN
IF YOU ARE NOT SELECTED, DO YOU WANT TO BE NOTIFIED? .~YES __NO
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON ANOTHER IOWA CITY BOARD OR COMMISSION?
YES ~--~.0
(It has been Council policy not to permit an individual to serve on two Boards or Commissions at the same time.)
Misrepresentations on this application will constitute just cause for removal of an appointee.
If you fail to answer all questions on the application you may not be considered for appointment.
cclerk~oolctapp.doc July 1997
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN FOR
FY2000, FY2O01, AND FY2002
AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
FINANCIAL PLAN
Fiscal Year 2000 through 2002
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
CITY COUNCIL
Ernie Lehman, Mayor
Connie Champion
Karen Kubby
Dee Norton
Mike O'Donnell
Dean Thornberry
Dee Vanderhoef
CITY MANAGER
Stephen J. Atkins
BUDGET ANALYST
Deb Mansfield
FINANCE DIRECTOR
Donald J. Yucuis
APPRECIATION
This financial plan includes the ideas and recommendations of many citizens, the
City Council and the City staff. During the year many suggestions are received
from citizens in the City Council hearings and informal contacts. The major
impact of the City Council upon this financial plan is in the priorities and programs
adopted by the City Council during the current year.
While other departments were intensely involved in the preparation of this
financial plan, most of the credit for the document goes to the members of the
Finance Department. Particular gratitude is expressed to the City Manager, the
Finance Director, the Budget/Management Analyst, the Finance Secretaries, the
Document Services Center, the Data Processing Division and the Print Shop.
While we surely appreciate all contributions to this budget, it must be
remembered that the real thanks must go to the City employees, who, on a daily
basis, transform this document into the City's program of services.
Printed on
recycled paper
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FINANCIAL PLAN
FISCAL YEARS 2000, 2001 & 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY MANAGER'S LETTER
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW .......................................................................
FINANCIAL AND FISCAL POLICIES ................................................................
SUMMARIES AND CHARTS:
Budget Highlights ...................................................................................
Financial Plan Analysis .............................................................................
All Funds Financial Summaries ...................................................................
Transfers-In ............................................................................................
Transfers-Out ..........................................................................................
Authorized Personnel
FY2000 Additional Position Requests .........................................................
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY:
Financial Plan Summary .........................................................................
Expenditures by Division .......................................................................
Administrative Divisions Receipts ............................................................
Administrative Divisions Expenditure .......................................................
POLICY & ADMINISTRATION
City Council ..........................................................................................
City Clerk .............................................................................................
City Attorney ........................................................................................
Year 2000 Census .................................................................................
City Manager ........................................................................................
Human Relations
Finance Administration
Accounting & Reporting .........................................................................
Central Procurement & Services ...............................................................
Treasury ...............................................................................................
Document Services ................................................................................
Information Services
Risk Management ..................................................................................
Government Buildings ............................................................................
Human Rights Activities .........................................................................
Non-Operational Administration (includes Aid to Agency Funding --
see page 29 for narrative) ..................................................................
HOME AND COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM:
Planning and Community Development: PCD Administration ............................................................................
Urban Planning & Development ............................................................
Neighborhood Services ........................................................................
Community Development Non-Grant Activity ..........................................
Economic Development .......................................................................
Comprehensive Plan Update .................................................................
Planning & Development Grants ...........................................................
PAGE
1
4
5
7
15
20
38
44
46
49
50
53
54
56
56
57
57
57
58
58
58
59
59
59
60
60
60
60
61
61
62
63
63
64
64
65
65
65
Engineering ...........................................................................................66
Public Works Administration .................................................................... 66
C.B,D. Maintenance ...............................................................................67
Energy Conservation Administration ......................................................... 67
Traffic Engineering .................................................................................68
Street System Maintenance .................................................................... 68
Forestry/Horticulture ..............................................................................69
Cemetery .............................................................................................69
COMMUNITY PROTECTION PROGRAM:
Police:
Summary .........................................................................................71
Administration ..................................................................................72
Patrol ..............................................................................................72
Criminal Investigation ........................................................................ 73
Records ...........................................................................................73
Community Services .......................................................................... 74
Emergency Communications ............................................................... 74
Animal Control ..................................................................................7E
Fire 76
Housing & Inspection Services:
Administration ..................................................................................77
Building Inspection ............................................................................77
Housing Inspection ............................................................................ 78
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS:
Parks & Recreation Administration .......................................................... 79
Parks ..................................................................................................79
Recreation ...........................................................................................80
Library ................................................................................................81
Library Special Revenue ........................................................... .............. 82
Senior Center .......................................................................................82
ENTERPRISE FUNDS:
Parking:
Parking Operations ............................................................................... 83
Parking Reserves ..................................................................................84
Public Transit:
Public Transit Operations ....................................................................... 87
Transit Revenues ..................................................................................88
Public Transit Reserves 89
Wastewater Treatment:
Wastewater Treatment Operations .......................................................... 90
Wastewater Treatment Reserves ............................................................ 91
Water:
Water Operations ................................................................................. 94
Water Reserves ....................................................................................94
Refuse Collection Operations ..................................................................... 96
Landfill:
Landfill Operations ................................................................................97
Landfill Reserves ..................................................................................98
Airport Operations ...................................................................................1 O0
Broadband Telecommunications:
Broadband Telecommunications Operations .............................................. 101
Local Access Pass Through .................................................................... 101
Public Access 102
Broadband Te~r~U~i~i~.F~i~:~~.~.~.~;~;~:::::::::::::::: 102
Cable Refranchising .............................................................................. 102
OTHER FUNDS:
DEBT SERVICE FUND:
Fund Summary .....................................................................................103
Summary of Expenditures ...................................................................... 104
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TRUST:
Employee Benefits Fund Summary .......................................................... 105
Public Safety Reserve Fund Summary ...................................................... 105
Employee Benefits Summary of Expenditures ........................................... 106
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS:
Road Use Tax - Fund Summary .............................................................. 107
Road Use Tax - Expenditure Detail .......................................................... 108
JOHNSON COUNTY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (J.C.C.O.G.):
Summary ............................................................................................110
Administration 110
Transportation Planning ........................................................................ 111
Human Services Planning ...................................................................... 111
Solid Waste Management ..................................................................... 112
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT:
Community Development Grants ............................................................ 112
CDBG Metro Entitlement ....................................................................... 113
CDBG Flood Grant ................................................................................ 113
INTRAGOVERNMENTAL SERVICE FUNDS:
Computer Information Services ............................................................... 114
Computer Replacement Fund ................................................................. 114
Police Computer Replacement Fund 115
Finance/Human Resources Software Reserve ............................................ I 15
Equipment Maintenance ........................................................................ 116
Equipment Replacement Reserve ............................................................ 117
Fire Equipment Replacement Reserve ...................................................... 117
Central Services ...................................................................................118
MISC. OTHER FUNDS:
Library Equipment Replacement Reserve .................................................. 119
Library Computer Replacement Reserve ................................................... 119
Parkland Acquisition Reserve .................................................................. 120
Parkland Development Reserve ............................................................... 120
Assisted Housing ................................................................................. 121
Energy Conservation ............................................................................. 123
Risk Management Loss Reserve .............................................................. 124
Health Insurance Reserve ....................................................................... 124
Special Assessments ............................................................................ 125
RISE Repayment Fund ........................................................................... 125
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM:
FY99-FY2003 Summary by Category ...................................................... 128
Project Detail by Category ..................................................................... 129
Summary by Revenue Category .............................................................. 142
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Summary ...................................... 144
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail ........................................... 146
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses ................. 160
Unfunded Projects FY2004 and Beyond ................................................... 194
APPENDIX:
Preparation of the Financial Plan ............................................................. 195
Process to Amend the Financial Plan ....................................................... 196
Resolution Approving the Financial Plan ................................................... 197
Resolution Adopting the Annual Budget ................................................... 198
Adopted Budget Summary ..................................................................... 199
Adoption of Budget and Certification of Taxes .......................................... 200
Personnel Listing by Department Full-Time Equivalents .............................. 201
Authorized Positions by Department ........................................................ 202
Personnel Reconciliation ........................................................................ 203
Index by Department ............................................................................ 205
Tax Levies for Iowa City Area ................................................................ 207
Property Tax Rates Statistical History ...................................................... 208
Glossary .............................................................................................209
finadmfoudget/toc-finp.doc
March 1999
City Council
City of Iowa City
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
Re:
Budget Message
Fiscal Year 2000 to 2002 Proposed Three Year Financial Plan
To assist in the preparation of the three-year operating budget for the fiscal years 2000, 2001,
and 2002, we have relied upon extensive financial analysis work, much of it done during the
summer of 1997. This work included a ten-year financial history updated as a part of our
financial trend monitoring system; a ten-year financial projection based upon current state law,
with accompanying expense and revenue analysis; a ten-year City employment history, that is
the number of employees providing public services with specific attention directed to the impact
of new services or policies; and a years' plus worth of experience with respect to the financial
policy guidelines approved earlier by the City Council. I believe we have assembled a
comprehensive financial information package to assist in our budget preparation. This financial
information was not intended to deal with community political issues, but concentrate on our
financial history projections and trends.
We have had early success in fulfilling the financial policies of the City Council and this, coupled
with continued growth has allowed us to project a more favorable financial position. Our analysis
would indicate that some financial flexibility now exists within our General Fund budgets.
However, using this financial opportunity it is not without dsk and will require caution. As you
are aware, we never know from year to year what legislative changes may be imposed by the
state government. Yet, we know risk can be equated to a calculated circumstance and if we
choose to proceed cautiously, both financially and politically, we can achieve quality public
services, fulfill our community's agenda of needs and interests, and do our best to assure a
political and financial foundation that can be carried forward and sustained by future generations
of Iowa Citians.
It is unknown what our new state leadership might do, but for the purposes of our budget
preparation, we believe no dramatic changes will occur. Financial regulations currently in place,
such as the loss of machinery and equipment taxation, limited to no growth in the
reimbursements by the state, our overall reliance on property tax as our financial foundation,
etc., these regulations and others we have assumed will likely remain in place. The political
process of the state and its partisan nature would seem to indicate that negotiation and
compromise will likely need to occur if either political party hopes to fulfill its agenda. Out of that
process we can hope for more favorable municipal finance regulations and possible
opportunities for cities to exercise greater self-determination, or at the very least no
diminishment of our current position.
As you know I have not traditionally used my budget message to comment on issues of a
partisan nature. However, I do believe it is important with respect to the new political
circumstances in our capitol. The State is financially healthy with strong reserve positions and a
variety of revenue sources. Such conditions can hopefully lead to greater legislative and
-1-
executive initiative on the future of our State rather than partisan bickering over how best to
handle some crisis. The State government is not in crisis.
The local option sales tax vote was held on March 30, 1999 and was defeated. There were no
sales tax funded projects included in the budget. The sales tax revenue option, much like our
State government enjoys, would have diversified our tax base. I believe it to clearly be the
State's policy to encourage municipalities to seek the local option tax and utilize those funds to
supplement public services as well as provide relief from fees, charges, and taxes. Without the
sales tax option our initiatives are far more limited, notably in the future.
The financial flexibility in the budget is due to a number of factors, most notable is a residential
rollback increase. The increase in the rollback factor and the resulting expansion of our property
tax base has a profound effect on our financial future. In our earlier projections we had
anticipated the rollback to continue to limit tax base. The rollback increase from 54.9% to 56.5%
does mean the General Fund, assuming current tax rate policy, has new resources available
and when coupled with our continued modest growth would indicate the City's General Fund is
in a better position to consider service amendments in response to community needs and
interests. This will also bring into question program priorities. Our capital improvement plan is
very aggressive and will have a bearing on the General Fund. With the proposed addition of, for
example, new recreation, fire, and airport facilities, expanding parkland and trail development,
these capital investments lead directly to increases in operating expense and the need to
secure tax and/or fee for service support. Your budget policy decisions will determine the full
extent of what public services will receive our attention over the next three years.
Our ability to finance and support capital investment is of particular importance in these budget
recommendations, notably the long-term commitment of staff resources to support these
projects. The City, has over the years, been willing to invest in our capital assets, streets,
sewers, facilities, etc. and thereby work to avoid burdening future generations with infrastructure
failure and/or inadequate public facilities. However, this cannot be said of operating services.
They are often absorbed into our current complement of personnel with associated operating
expenses. As we continue to grow we will need to address operating services and the demands
placed on them by way of our community's interests.
We also have operating programs and their respective budgets which are taking a "new"
direction in fulfilling a program or policy. Our Economic Development Coordinator has assumed
substantial responsibility for our downtown development initiatives. While on the surface this is a
favorable indication of the City's direction, any economic development initiatives are likely to be
"back bumered" as we fulfill our downtown commitments. Our Transit system with a new
downtown interchange will propose in this budget the use of customer service representatives to
staff the new downtown facility in order to support our interest in promoting transit opportunities
for our citizens.
The full effect of certain City services on the budgets of other departments is important to our
management of expenses. Our Police Citizens Review Board has staff and private legal counsel
assigned, and their work does influence the workload of other City operations, such as City
Attomey's office, City Clerk, the time involved by Police Investigators and thereby this new
public service requires more support than is indicated within its specific operating budget. The
same can be said for our new Public Arts Advisory Committee. The concept was created with
capital funds, a citizen's committee was added, and yet, we did not provide for additional staff
resources which have been absorbed by current personnel.
-2-
As we review our operations, and the necessary financial resources, the pressures to provide
public services within our resources has truly become a delicate balancing act of policy
leadership, management oversight, and resource availability. We have attempted in these
budget proposals for FY2000, 2001, and 2002 to offer the community a package of services
utilizing available tax resources.
The budget, as proposed, offers several major operational initiative commitments. The addition
of six new police officers by way of a $450,000 federal grant, has been incorporated into our
plan; a new fire station and accompanying professional staff is proposed as we respond to
community growth; an aggressive capital project plan to meet or exceed our infrastructure
requirements and thereby address our maintenance and safety obligations as well as create
future development opportunities; and wherever practical, staff support for services that are in
need of attention merely due to increasing service demands. These would include an expanding
park system, new pedestrian trails, street inventory and maintenance, greater management
attention to police training and support for our Senior Center, its programs, and the maintenance
of an aging building.
Sincerely,
City Manager
-3-
Citizens of Iowa City
,I,,
Elected
Officials
Key
Appointed
Dy
Council
& Mayor
Mayor &
City
Council
DireclortManagar
Employed by
Board or
Commission
Appointed
Dy City
Manager
J
A
Airport
Cam mission
Boards &
Commissions
City
Attorney
City
Manager
Clerk
Library
Board ol
Trustees
Assislanl
City Finance
Manager Direnor
,,,
Broadband
' Teleconlmua~calions
-Human Rights
__Personnel
Administration
Housing & Parks & Planning &
Fire Inspeclion Community Police
C h ief S errices Recreation
Direclot Director Development Chief
Oireclor
k. ,/ k Jk ,2 k. / k, , k. j kL
-Adminislration -^dministralion -~clmi~istration - Administration --Administration
- Adminislration - A~min.,'Trainin9 I
Assisted 'CBD Mainlenance _Community - Animal Conlrol Energy
- Accounting -Fire Prevention - Housing Developmenl 'Conservation
- Cemetery
-Fire Suppression Building
- Document -Inspection ' Forestry
Services
Housing Governm ant
'inspection ' Buildings
-- Informalion
Services 'Parks
- Recreation
Public Senior
Works Center
Director Coordinator
-- Purchasing
'JCCOG Programs _Community
Services - Engineering
- UrPan Planning Criminal ' Equipment
' Investigalion Maintenance
Economic
- Landfill
- Developmenl Emergency
' Communications ' Solid Waste
Neighborhood
- Services - Patrol - Streets
Senior C enter
--Risk Management
Records &
- ' Wastewater
Identification Treatment
__ Treasury
_ Water
Parking
& Transit
Director
lTransit
Operalions
Parking
-4-
FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW
The Three-Year Financial Plan (the Plan) is again being used for Fiscal Years (FY) 2000 through
FY2002, which begin on July 1 and end on June 30. This is a one year annual budget that
meets State of Iowa code requirements for budgets, but also provides an additional two years
of projections as a planning tool for City government. The "Financial Plan Overview" discuss-
es the basis that the financial plan has been built upon. The Financial Plan operating budget
includes the "General Fund" and "Enterprise Operating and Reserve Funds." A separate multi-
year Capital Improvements Program (CIP) plan through FY2004 is included.
The role of a government's operating budget differs from that of a private business. Budgets
are an important internal planning tool for business. However, in government, budgets also
play an external role. A multi-year financial plan informs parties both inside and outside
government of its future objectives in providing services to its constituents.
The three year plan permits particular emphasis to be placed on property tax levies, user fee
projections, fund balances, the scheduling of capital purchases (both equipment and major
improvement projects) and debt service/bond financing costs. The three year planning process
provides a means to meet most funding needs at some time within the three year period. The
Plan has become a reliable planning document and a management tool.
The modified cash basis of accounting has been used for preparation of the Plan because the
City maintains its daily accounting records on this basis. Therefore, revenues are recorded
when received, not necessarily when they are earned, and expenditures are recorded when
paid instead of when they are incurred. The Plan summarizes the budget by major category
within each division. Actual receipts and expenditures are monitored carefully on a line-item
basis by the Finance Administration Division, the department head in charge of each division
and compared to the budget throughout the fiscal year. Department heads are ultimately
responsible for ensuring that the divisions under their control stay within budget.
-5-
'-6-
BUDGET POLICIES
Operating Budget
Revenue Policies
Capital Improvement Program
Reserve Policies
Investment Policies
Debt Policies
Compensated Absences
Accounting, Auditing and
Financial Reporting
Purchasing Policies
Risk Management Policies
FINANCIAL AND FISCAL POLICIES
The City of Iowa City's financial policies set forth the basic framework for the overall fiscal
management of the City. These policies assist the decision-making process of the City
Council. These policies provide guidelines for evaluating both current activities and proposals
for future programs.
Most of the policies represent long-standing principles, traditions and practices, and follow
generally accepted accounting principles which have guided the City in the past and have
helped maintain financial stability.
n
[3
OPERATING BUDGET POLICIES
The City will prepare an annual balanced budget for all operating funds.
The City will maintain a budgetary control system to ensure adherence to the budget
and will prepare regular reports comparing actual revenues and expenditures to budgeted
amounts.
Operating budgets are established on a fund/department/program basis.
A contingency account will be maintained in the annual General Fund operating budget
to provide for unanticipated expenditures or to meet unexpected small increases in
service delivery costs. The City Council will be informed quarterly on staff initiated
amendments from the contingency account to the operating programs within the
General Fund.
Budget amendments may be made throughout the year with approval of the Department
Director, Director of Finance and the City Manager. The City Council formally reviews
and approves all amendments processed by staff twice a year in August/September and
May.
Increases or amendments to operating budgets are made only in the following situations:
- emergency situations
- transfer from contingency
- expenditures with offsetting revenues or fund balance
- carry-over of prior year budget authority for expenses that had not been paid as of the
end of the fiscal year.
OPERATING BUDGET PREPARATION CRITERIA
General Guidelines
Maintain the fiscal integrity of the City's operating and capital improvement budgets in
order to provide services and to construct and maintain the City's infrastructure.
Maintain the City's responsible fiscal position and AAA bond rating.
-7-
Present budget data to the City Council in a format that will facilitate annual budget
decisions based on a three-year planning perspective. Provide the City Council with a
summary of the three-year forecasts.
Encourage citizen involvement in the annual budget decision-making process through
public hearings, informal meetings, budget briefs and related informational efforts.
Service Level Guidelines
Deliver service levels which are consistent with the citizens' willingness to pay and the
City's available resources.
- Base decisions to reduce service levels or eliminate programs on City-wide priorities.
- Recognize that City employees are one of the City government's most valuable
resources and are essential to the delivery of high quality, efficient services.
Revenue Guidelines
- Property tax levy rates will not exceed the limits as established by the State of Iowa.
- Revise user fee rate structures to charge the costs of service provided to the benefiting
customers, while maintaining sensitivity to the needs of low income citizens.
- Support federal and state legislation which provides property tax relief. Oppose
legislation which imposes local service mandates without fiscal support.
Expenditure Guidelines
Support responsible management efforts to increase productivity by providing resources
for office automation, preventive maintenance, risk management/employee safety, and
employee training.
REVENUE POLICIES
The City will try to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to minimize short-
run fluctuations in any one revenue source.
[] The City will attempt to maximize benefits from major revenue sources as a way of
maintaining a stable property tax rate.
[] The City will follow an aggressive policy of collecting revenues.
The City will establish all user charges and fees at a level related to the full cost
{operating, direct, and indirect) of providing the service, whenever practical.
The City will review licenses, fees, and charges annually to determine if the revenues
support the cost of providing the service.
-8-
D
[~
Parking, Refuse, Wastewater Treatment, Landfill, Broadband Telecommunications and
Water funds will be self-supporting through user fees.
- Rate adjustments will be submitted to the City Council by ordinance if state or
locally legislated, or by resolution (if not state or locally legislated).
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET POLICIES
The City will develop a multi-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which will be
reviewed and updated annually, comply with City Council goals and be compatible with
the Comprehensive Plan whenever possible.
The complete multi-year CIP funding plan must be balanced each year by matching
projected expenditures with proposed revenue sources by fund.
Funding for projects should be obtained through borrowing from:
- bond market, general obligation or revenue bonds
- enterprise fund operations and reserves
- internal loans
The City may utilize General Fund cash balances to fund capital projects whenever
available and feasible.
The City shall utilize available funding sources for capital improvements whenever
practical and feasible such as but not limited to:
- federal and state grant funds
- special assessments
- developer contributions
The City will maintain its physical assets at a level adequate to protect the City's capital
investment and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs. The budget will
provide for the adequate maintenance and the orderly replacement of the capital plant
and equipment from current revenues when possible.
RESERVE POLICIES
The City will establish a contingency line-item in the annual General Fund operating
budget to provide for unanticipated expenditures or to meet unexpected small increases
in service delivery costs.
Operating cash balances at fiscal year-end will be maintained at a level to ensure
sufficient cash flow throughout the fiscal year.
Reserves will be maintained in the Water, Wastewater and Parking Funds in accordance
with existing Bond Ordinance provisions.
-9-
D
Reserves will be maintained for equipment replacement and for unexpected major repairs
in the following areas: Parking, Wastewater, Water, Landfill, Transit, Broadband
Telecommunication, Equipment Replacement, Information Services, and Central Services
as well as Library Computer Equipment and Parkland Acquisition and Replacement
(moved out of General Fund in FY98).
Reserves, based on third party actuaries, will be maintained for the Risk Management
Loss Reserve, Medical and Dental Insurance Funds.
All City trucks, cars and necessary accessories will be maintained on a replacement cost
basis each year. A separate reserve fund has been set up to fund these replacements.
Additions to the fleet are made through allocations in the annual budget. Fire
Department vehicles and Transit buses will be purchased through the issuance of debt.
All general obligation debt will be paid from the Debt Service Fund. General Obligation
debt applicable to Enterprise Fund projects will be paid out of the Debt Service Fund, but
will be abated from revenues from the respective Enterprise Fund(s).
INVESTMENT POLICIES
Disbursement, collection, and deposit of all funds will be managed to insure maximum
investment opportunity for City funds.
The City will strive to maximize the return on its investment portfolio, with the primary
objective of preserving capital in accordance with the City's investment policy and
prudent investment practices.
All City funds not restricted by bond issue covenants will be pooled for investments,
with interest allocations made monthly.
DEBT POLICIES
The City will confine long-term borrowing to capital improvements. Short term
borrowing will be applicable for large dollar rolling stock (buses, fire apparatus)
purchases and computer systems.
[] Total general obligation debt will not exceed 5% of total taxable assessed value of real
property.
[] The debt service property tax levy shall not exceed 25% of the total property tax levy.
[] The City will follow a policy of full disclosure on every financia~ report and bond
prospectus.
[] The City will use "pay as you go" financing to fund general capital improvement
projects, whenever feasible and practical.
-10-
COMPENSATED ABSENCES
Administrative employees hired prior to June 15, 1983 and all other employees hired prior to
June 29, 1985, upon death, retirement or termination (except firefighters) are entitled to be
paid for one-half of the total accumulated sick leave hours at the current effective hourly rate
for that employee up to the sick leave payout amount calculated as of June 28, 1985,
whichever is less.
After June 28, 1985, employees accumulate vacation, sick leave, and other benefits at
various rates depending on bargaining group and length of service. Employees are paid for
their total unused vacation time upon death, termination (except firefighters) or retirement.
However, sick leave can only be used during employment. The cost of compensated
absences are recognized when payments are made to employees and the City amends the
budget at that time,
ACCOUNTING. AUDITING. AND FINANCIAL REPORTING POLICIES
Quarterly financial reports will be prepared.
[] A three-year financial plan for all operating funds will be prepared by the City Manager
and presented to the City Council for their review,
A Multi-Year Capital Improvement Program budget will be prepared, reviewed and
revised annually.
[] An independent audit will be performed annually for all City funds.
The City will produce a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) in accordance
with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as outlined by the Governmental
Accounting Standards Board.
PURCHASING POLICIES
Purchases for all City departments for the City of Iowa City shall be in accordance with
the City Procurement Policy.
Methods of source selection are as follows:
-Public Improvements
Competitive sealed bidding shall be used for Public Improvement Contracts of ~ 25,000
or greater (Code of Iowa). This process shall consist of:
Invitation for bids
Public notice
Bid opening
Bid acceptance and bid evaluation
Bid award - City Council/Commission authorization
-11 -
-Professional Services
The consultant selection procedures guide all City departments involved in procuring
engineering, architectural, and other professional services. Within approved budgets,
the City Manager may approve contracts up to $50,000 and the City Council approves
contracts over ~ 50,000.
-Major Purchases
The Purchasing Division operates a "voluntary purchasing" system rather than a
complete "centralized purchasing" system. Under the voluntary system, departments
obtain standard operating items, within approved budgets, utilizing Purchasing
procedures. The Purchasing Division reviews various categories of merchandise and
services and makes recommendations for consolidation and standardization of
purchases to reduce duplication and overall costs.
-Emergency Procurement
In the event of an emergency, supplies, services or construction may be purchased
without regard to normal purchase selection procedures to protect the health and
welfare of the public. The City Manager shall keep the City Council informed of the
extent of the emergency.
-Gifts/Conflict of Interest/Interest in Public Contracts
Conduct shall be in accordance with the Code of Iowa - Chapters 68B.22 Gifts,
68B.2A Conflict of Interest and 362.5 Interest in Public Contract. A City officer or
employee shall not have an interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or job of work
or material or the profits thereof or services to be furnished or performed for the
officers or employees of the City.
RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES
It shall be the policy of the City of Iowa City to assume the risk of property damage,
liability and dishonesty in all cases in which the exposure is so small or dispersed that
the loss would not significantly or adversely affect the operations or financial position
of the City.
Insurance will not be purchased to cover loss exposures below prevailing deductible/
retention amounts of current insurance held by the City of Iowa City, unless such
insurance is required by statute or by contact, or in those instances in which it is
desirable to obtain special services, such as inspection or claim adjustment services in
connection with insurance. The deductible/retention amounts will be reviewed once
annually by the Director of Finance and the Risk Manager to ensure appropriateness of
the amounts.
-12-
[3
Insurance will be purchased where possible against all major exposures which might
result in loss in excess of the City's insurance reserve through the purchase of the
following types of insurance.
All risk insurance on real and personal property.
General liability insurance.
Automobile liability insurance.
Fidelity and crime insurance.
Catastrophic workmen's compensation insurance.
The City will self-insure in those instances where the cost of insurance is so high that
it would be more cost effective to assume the risk.
Property will be insured on replacement cost basis, as determined by a competent
appraisal service, against as wide a range of perils as possible. The value will be
reviewed once annually by the Risk Manager and the City's insurance advisor.
Loss prevention recommendations made by insurance companies, the state fire marshal
or local fire authorities will, whenever possible, be implemented. In those cases in
which such recommendations are not followed, a written report in which an explanation
or justification is made will be filed with the Director of Finance and the City Manager
within 30 days of receipt of the report.
Insurance will be purchased only through licensed agents or agencies who have the staff
and technical competence to adequately service the insurance provided.
Insurance will be placed only in insurance companies rated A + or A in Bests. Insurance
placed in other companies will require a written report of the particulars, such report to
be filed with the Risk Manager.
The administration of the risk management policy will be a responsibility of the Risk
Manager. Such responsibility includes placement of insurance coverage, maintenance
of property appraisals and inventories, processing of claims and maintenance of loss
records, and supervision of loss prevention activities.
Settlement of claims are handled through the Risk Management Division and/or City
Attorney Office. The Risk Manager is authorized to settle claims up to $3,000, the City
Manager authorizes claim settlements between $3,000 and ~20,000 and City Council
approval is needed for settlements above 920,000.
-13-
SU'MMARIES & CHARTS
Budget Highlights
Financial Plan Analysis
All Funds Financial Summaries
Transfers
Authorized Personnel
Additional Position Requests
Budget Highlights
Housinq InsDection
+$2,500
In joint effort with the Fire Department, HIS will expand its educational
efforts related to public awareness of Fire/Life Safety issues. Promotional
matedal will be prepared directed at such an effort.
+4,200
Four (4) additional cell phones, one for each inspector. Our inspectors
have many inspection appointments dudng the day as well as while in the
field, they are to investigate complaints/nuisance cases. The ability to
place phone calls from the field would increase their efficiency. Currently
a radio call is placed to the HIS office by the inspector and the office staff
places phone calls on behalf of the inspector.
Assisted Housing
It is anticipated that HUD will reduce the administrative fee available for
the operations/staff support for our support of federal housing programs.
Our recent organizational changes anticipated such circumstances, but
as always our housing programs are subject to Congressional mood
swings.
Parks and Recreation Administration
+$40,000
Engineering
Consulting services to assist in the development of a City-wide parks and
recreation master plan. Some interest has been generated in a
comprehensive plan for our many parks and recreation programs and
facilities. Notably with the substantial increase in parkland acreage, both
traditional and natural areas, the new gymnasium space, and the
continued investment in our downtown recreation center, new roof (1994),
new boilers (proposed 1999), and other related investments, an overall
plan appears to be in our community's best interests. It is assumed the
plan preparation would be under the direction of the Parks and
Recreation Commission, with support from other Boards, such as
Riverfront/Natural Areas Commission.
+$40,800
Senior Engineering Technician
This technician has been recommended in order to more fully address our
responsibilities for public right-of-way management. With deregulation of
utility and telecommunications industries, as well as the other users of the
public right-of-way, mapping, inspection and general oversight of the
right-of-way has been more critical. We know of 14 users of the right-of-
way with each subject to varying regulations and/or controls. We would
hope to recover the cost of this new position to the fullest extent practical
by way of chargeback to various utility funds and the users of the right-of-
way.
-15-
+$54,100 Senior Engineer
Water
+46,800
Forestry
+5,500
Library
+$77,200
+$3,500
+$2,100
Transit
+$102,400
The extent of our capital improvement plan as well as the desire for timely
and accurate development review raquires additional staff attention. This
position will be funded by chargebacks to various utility funds and
development review costs.
Electronics Technician
This position is part of the Water Division long-range comprehensive plan
implementation. This staff person will maintain, install and program
electronic and electrical control systems.
This will increase the annual appropriation for our Re-leaf program from
$2,000 to $7,500. This project is substantially for street trees, not park
trees. It is also projected to be $5,000 for FY2001, and $5,000 for
FY2002.
Additional 2.25 FTE employees in order to utilize City employees to
perform routine cleaning and maintenance of the Library. The Budget has
been reduced by $60,000 the current cost of contract cleaning.
Cover the skylight in the Children's room with reflective film. Due to the
large glass area on the south side of the Library the temperatures dse
higher than elsewhere and cannot be controlled with HVAC system.
Riser would be available in Room A to elevate a stage for performers and
participants and improve audience viewing.
Transit Customer Service Representative
Transit Customer Service Representatives (1.75 FTE) would replace 1.75
Mass Transit Operator positions with no increase in total complement of
personnel. With the opening of a new downtown transit office we would
like to have someone working out of the downtown hub office for the
purpose of customer inquiries. This person can also serve to fill in if a
driver were ill or running behind schedule. If that were to occur,
telephone cells would be "rolled over" the Riverside Drive Transit office.
We now have a different driver every day doing "on call" work. We believe
we can better match the skills necessary with a person who is a customer
service representative as well as a driver.
City's 20% share of capital costs for transit roof replacement ($80,000),
methane abatement ($400,000), and new bus shelters ($32,000). Federal
grants are pending for 80% of the project costs. This cost may is
proposed as a General Fund expense. We may wish to consider the use
of debt.
-16-
The costs/conditions, etc. associated with City assuming the maintenance
responsibility of SEATS vehicles has not been incorporated into this
Budget.
The route study and related changes will be available in
January/February, however the goal is to provide revised services within
existing resources.
Planninq & Community Development
+$2,400
Additional print shop costs due to mailings associated with the
Neighborhood Council newsletters.
+$35,000
Consulting services assistance as part of the district plan process
currently underway throughout the City.
+$20,000
In response to the Housing Forum proposals, consultant services to
review/recommend on the City's development codes as they relate to
housing affordability.
+$2,000
With expanded emphasis in our JCCOG traffic engineering/planning
program we have expanded use of and request for traffic counts. The
wear and tear on these devices is such that we need to commit $2,000 a
year to replace these counting devices.
Police Administration
+$65,000
Police Sergeant - Training
Police training has been continually expanded over the years, and it has
also come under greater scrutiny, both publicly and by police
professionals. Similar to our Fire service, we believe full time attention is
necessary for police training. This Sergeant would report to the Captain
for Administrative Services, and we believe would increase the
effectiveness and efficiency of training. This would include all "outside"
training, represent the City on the Mobile Team Curriculum Committee,
facilitate our in-house "field training", F.A.T.S. related firearms training
and maintain all training records and related documents. It is also planned
to the fullest extent practical to incorporate training as part of annual
officer evaluation.
Police Criminal Investigation
+ $261,800
Six Additional Police Officers
These six additional officers would be assigned to Patrol
responsibilities. The Federal government has recommended a grant of
$450,000 over three years. The grant will fund 75% of the cost. The
budget proposal reflects the annual grant of $150,000 with a City
General Fund share of $111,000.
Fire
+ $435,400
.Airport
+ $9,000
Parks and Recreation
$116,100
Nine Additional Firefighters
These new positions have been identified for years 2001, 2002, and
2003, and serve as the nucleus for staffing the proposed new Fire
Station (#4). The last fire station constructed was in 1972. Since that
time the population has increased + 30%, as well as the
business/industrial expansions which have occurred. In 1972 the fire
service primarily provided fire suppression services. Today the
department provides support to emergency medical services,
hazardous materials, code enforcement, rescue/confined space, and
public education. Additionally, OSHA requires fire departments to
assemble four personnel before initiating an interior fire attack. Given
the lack of actual street access in the northeast, response times are
exacerbated.
Airport Maintenance Worker
The request was to expand the Airport Maintenance Worker from
half-time to full-time. Recognizing the investment in new Airport
facilities as identified in the Master Plan, the budget proposes the
expansion staged over two years, a ~A time expansion each year.
Clerk Typist and Maintenance Worker - Mercer/Scanlon Gymnasium
Maintenance Worker II - Parks
In anticipation of the opening of the new ScanIon Gymnasium, an
additional Y2 time maintenance staff ($17,100)is recommended. In
preparing projections of the costs to operate, this maintenance
position was considered. The budget also proposes an additional Clerk
Typist at Mercer Center. It is anticipated substantial new traffic at the
Center will occur, and with our technological investment in computer
capability ($26,000), we will be able to connect our recreation
scheduling and related activities to our downtown center, thereby
allowing citizens to schedule participation in recreation activities while
at Mercer/Scanlon.
A parks maintenance worker position is being added to help maintain
the growing number of Park acres. In the past 12 years,
approximately 540 acres of parkland have been added.
-18-
Senior Center
+$16,700
Streets Maintenance
+ $45,200
Information Services
+ $18,700
+ 51,700
Maintenance Worker
The Senior Center building will continue to experience maintenance
problems well into the future, due substantially to the buildings age
and usage. Its use by other community interest groups also places a
burden on the maintenance work effort. The decision on addition
space, that is, whether there will be more space allocated to the
Center by way of the available space in the Iowa Avenue parking
garage must be considered in future staff commitments. The use of
temporary employees $8,000 + per year, and its elimination from the
budget, helps support this increased expenditure.
Maintenance Worker
We wish to expand our snow removal routes from 10 to 11, as well
as supplement other street related maintenance work, such as leaf
collection, signs/signals, etc. Our street mileage continues to grow.
The Road Use Tax is the source of finance for our street programs
and has, with our continued population growth, shown it can absorb
additional maintenance responsibility.
Time ClerkTypist
This position would assist in managing the growing inventory of
computers and software, and would be responsible for ordering,
receiving and inventory of supplies, equipment and repairs.
Webmaster
This person will work with a senior management oversight committee
to develop a World Wide Web presence for the City and will be
responsible for programming on the City's internal web pages.
-19-
FINANCIAL PLAN ANALYSIS
GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS
General Governmental Operations consist of the General Fund, Enterprise funds, the Debt Service Fund,
the Trust and Agency Funds, Internal Service Funds and Special Revenue Funds.
PROPERTY TAX
Property tax is the single largest revenue source for the City General Fund, accounting for over
60% of FY2000 General Fund revenues. The City's property tax requests for FY2000 through
FY2004, including the FY99 certified tax requests, are proposed to be levied as follows:
FY99 FY2000
Tax Rate Tax Rate
Dollars Per $1000 Dollars Per $1,000
General
Library
Transit
Subtotal
13,379,524 8.100 13,981,484 8.100
445,984 .270 466,049 .270
1,569,203 .950 1,639,804 .950
15,394,711 9.320 16,087,337 9.320
Tort Liability
Employee Benefits
Debt Service
Subtotal
183,000 .111 381,367 .222
3,030,228 1.834 3,468,264 2.009
3,119,507 .1.868 4,001,609 2.300
21,727,446 13.133 23,938~577 13.851
% Chge from prior year 6.41% 2.64% 10.18% 5.46%
Ag. Bldgs. &Land 6,518 3.004 6,230 3.004
TOTAL LEVIED 21,733.~964 23,944,807
FY2001 FY2002
Tax Rate Tax Rate
Dollars Per$1000 Dollars Per$1000
General
Library
Transit
Subtotal
14,337,961 8.100 14,537,323 8.100
477,932 .270 484,577 0.270
1,681,613 .950 1,704,995 0.950
16,497,506 9.320 16,726,895 9.320
Tort Liability
Employee Benefits
Debt Service
Subtotal
396,731 0.224 425,000 0.237
3,611,000 2.040 3,916,420 2.182
5,148,189 2.887 5,990,889 3.313
25,653,426 14.471 27,059,204 15.052
% Chge from prior year 7.16% 4.48% 5.48% 4.01%
Ag. Bldgs. &Land 6t008 3.004 6,008 3.004
TOTAL LEVIED 25,659~_434' ,27~065J212
The FY2000 property tax levy rate is ~ 13.851
to $13.133 in FY99 or a 5.46% increase.
per $1,000 of taxable assessed valuation, compared
The FY2000 budget includes ~703,295 in property taxes and $178,674 in State property tax
replacements for machinery and equipment (M&E). M&E revenue is scheduled by the state to be
phased out completely by FY 2004. FY 2000 and 2001 revenue from property taxes and state
credit M&E is approximately $882,000 and $921,000 respectively. The revenue increases in FY
2001 because it is reimbursed at the respective year's current property tax rates. In FY 2002 the
state credit portion will be eliminated for Iowa City due to a formula tied to commercial growth, and
the M&E property taxes will be based on the valuation at that time, which are projected to have
dropped to about $222,000 in property taxes. The M&E class of property will be completely exempt
in FY 2004.
- 20 -
The FY2000 General 8.10 property tax levy totaling ~ 13,981,484 is used in the General Fund to pay
for the support of many services, such as police, fire, library, park and recreation services, The levy
cannot exceed $8.10 per ~ 1000 of taxable assessed valuation per State law.
The FY2000 Library tax levy of $.27, which was voted in by a majority of the residents in 1991, will
generate ~466,049. The initial levy was used to expand Library services and continues to maintain
that level of service,
The FY2000 transit levy totaling $1,639,804 is a "general" levy for transit purposes and must be
receipted into the general fund and then transferred (expensed) to the Transit Fund.
The FY2000 tort liability levy of 0.221 will generate $381,367. There is no maximum levy although
it is based on expenditure requirements. The General Fund 8.10 levy paid for all of tort liability prior
to FY99. All budgeted expenses related to tort liability that would have been included in the General
Fund have been moved to the Risk Management Fund.
The Employee Benefits property tax levy is used for General Fund employer costs of social security
(FICA - 7.65%), Iowa Public Employees Retirement System costs (IPERS - 5.75%), Municipal Fire
and Police Retirement System of Iowa (17%), health insurance, life insurance, disability insurance,
worker's compensation insurance premiums and unemployment compensation. The FY2000
Employee Benefits tax levy is $3,468,264. The Employee Benefits Fund reflects the use of local
Employee Benefits Retirement Fund Reserve monies to fund part of the employer share of the
Police/Fire pension contribution, $575,000 was used in FY99 and in FY2000 $585,000 is proposed.
The Debt Service (DS) levy provides funds for the payment of the principal and interest on general
obligation bonds of the City that are not abated by water or sewer funds. It can also be utilized to
fund the payment of any judgments against the City, unless other funding sources are provided. The
FY2000 levy increases from $3,119,507 to $4,001,609 in FY2000 due to a $9 million bond issue
in calendar year 1999. The levy is projected to increase to $5,148,189 in FY2001 and $5,990,889
in FY2002. New debt issues planned to pay for the cost of repairs and renovation to streets,
bridges, buildings, parks, etc. in 2000, 2001 and 2002 are $11.3 million, $6.7 million and $10,3
million, respectively,
Following is a schedule highlighting the changes from FY94 through FY2000 in assessed value,
state rollback, exemptions and taxable assessed value. Taxable assessed value. is calculated
by applying the state rollback factor to residential value and by subtracting military and TIF
exemptions.
Commercial, Less: Exemptions
Industrial & Military &
Description Residential Utilities TIF Values
Fiscal Year 2000
100% Assessment $1,542,400,050 $872,308,484 $ - - -
State rollback .564789 None - -
Less Exemptions .... (17,329,998)
Taxable Assessed Value $ 871,130,656 $872,308,484 $ (17,329,998)
Taxable
Assessed
Valuation
$2,414,708,534
(671,269,394)
(17,329,9981
$1,726,1 09, 142
Fiscal Year 1999
100% Assessment $ 1,500,669,280 $868,475,576 $ - - $2,369,144,856
State rollback .549090 * - * - - (695,304,253}
Loss: Exemptions .... (22,047,567) (22,047,567)
Taxable Assessed Value $ 824,002,432 $849,838,`1Z1 $(22,047,567) $1,651,7_93,036
· State rolled back Railroads and Commercial to .973606; Agland to .964206; Other Utilities and
Industrial are at 100%.
Fiscal Year 1998
100% Assessment
State Rollback
Less: Exemptions
Taxable Assessed Value
$1,381,920,090 $801,176,898 $2,183,096,988
0.588284 None (568,958,498)
(20,534,079) (20,534,079)
8.12,961,592 $801,176,898 $(20,534,079) $1_,593,~04~4~1
Fiscal Year 1997
100% Assessment $1,343,692,710 $800,633,095 - - $2,144,325,805
State rollback .593180 --* - - (563,841,269}
Less: Exemptions .... (20,304,794) (20,304,794)
Taxable Assessed Value $ 797,051,680 _$ 783,432,856 $(20,304,794) $1,560,179,742
*State rolled back Railroads and Commercial to .972824; other Utilities and Industrial are at 100%.
Fiscal Year 1996
100% Assessment $1,136,350,300 8728,058,842 - -
State rollback .675074 - -* * - -
Less: Exemptions .... (12,004,486)
Taxable Assessed Value $ 767,120,599 $726,090,574 $(12,004,486)
· *State rolled back Utilities to .97209; Commercial and Industrial are at 100%.
$1,864,409,142
(371,197,969)
(12,004,486)
$1<481~206,6~7
Fiscal Year 1995
100% Assessment $1,089,889,230 $693,293,313 $ - -
State rollback .680404 None - -
Less: Exemptions .... (9,078,219)
Taxable Assessed Value $ 74_1,564,958 $693,293,3_13 $ (9,078,219)
$1,783,182,543
(348,324,272)
(9,078,219)
$1,425,780,052
Fiscal Year 1994
100% Assessment $ 949,139,460 $651,001,896 $ - ~
State rollback .726985 None - -
Less: Exemptions .... (8,591,624)
Taxable Assessed Value $ 690~010,202 $651~001,8.96 $ (8,591,624)
$1,600,141,356
(259,129,258)
(8,591,624)
$1,332,420,474
- 22 -
Percenta.qe Changes
*FY2000 100% Assessment
FY99 100% Assessment
FY98 100% Assessment
FY97 100% Assessment
FY96 100% Assessment
FY95 100% Assessment
FY94 100% Assessment
*FY2000 State rollback
FY99 State rollback
FY98 State rollback
FY97 State rollback
FY96 State rollback
FY95 State rollback
FY94 State rollback
* FY2000 Taxable value
FY99 Taxable value
FY98 Taxable value
FY97 Taxable value
FY96 Taxable value
FY95 Taxable value
FY94 Taxable value
Commercial,
Industrial &
Residential Utilities Exeml~tions Total
2.78% 0.44% N/A 1.92%
8.59% 8.40% N/A 8.52%
2.84% .07% N/A 1.81%
18.25% 9.97% N/A 15.01%
4.26% 5.01% N/A 4.56%
14.83 % 6.50% N/A 11.44%
2.57% 3.92% N/A 3.11%
2.86% N/A N/A N/A
(6.66%) (2.64%) N/A N/A
(0.83%) N/A N/A N/A
(12.13%) (3.00%) N/A N/A
(0.78%) N/A N/A N/A
(6.41%) N/A N/A N/A
(.50%) N/A N/A N/A
5.72% 2.64% {21.40%) 4.50%
1.36% 6.07% 7.37% 3.65%
2.00% 2.26% 1.13% 2.14%
3.90% 7.90% 69.14% 5.33%
3.45% 4.73% 32.23% 3.89%
7.47% 6.50% 5.66% 7.01%
2.06% 3.92 % (13.64%) 3.08 %
100% assessed value increased by 1.92% from FY99 to FY2000; however, after applying the
state rollback factor and exemptions, taxable assessed value increased by 4.50%. The increase
in taxable value in FY2000 is due to new construction and changes in the state rollback rates,
The residential rollback increased from .549090 in FY99 to .564789 in FY2000. Commercial
property and railroads are back to 100% assessed value being taxable in FY2000 compared to
a rollback of .973606 in FY99.
- 23 -
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
FY2000 revenues total 933.6 million and are approximately 93.35 million or 11% more than
the FY99 revenues of 930.2 million. Sale of the Peninsula Property is budgeted at 1.3 million
in FY2000. Property tax revenue, including the transfer from the Employee Benefits Levy
accounts for approximately $1,052,000 of the FY2000 increased revenues. Another 9600,000
is from a transfer from the Employee Benefits fund to cover the 27th pay period in FY2000.
The General Fund includes machinery and equipment (M&E) property taxes and state credits
totaling 9593,462, $589,062, and $138,613 in FY2000-FY2002 respectively. M&E revenues
will be eliminated between FY2002 and FY2004 per the State Code. 9120,000 is budgeted
for the completion of the Police Federal Crime grant which reimburses the salaries and benefits
of 8 police officers. FY2000-FY2002 includes 9150,000 per year for a new Police Federal
Crime grant for 75% of salaries only (not benefits) for six additional police officers. The grant
total is 9450,000 over three years.
FY2001 revenues totaling $32.2 million are 987,000 less than the FY2000 total of $33.6
million (net of $1.3 million peninsula land sale). Property taxes increase by approximately
9515,000. The initial Federal Crime Grant is 90 in 2001, the transfer for the 27th pay period
of 9609,242 in FY2000 is a one-time revenue.
FY2002 revenues totaling $32.6 million are approximately $380,000 or 1.2% more than the
FY2001 total of $32.2 million. Property tax revenues, including the employee benefits transfer,
account for an increase of 9472,000. In FY2002 there is not any state reimbursement for
machinery and equipment (state credit loss of 9265,715), although a small amount of property
tax from M&E is expected.
General Fund revenues are summarized into nine major categories. The analysis of each
category follows:
Property Taxes (48% of total) -- This includes the General (8.10), Transit (.95), Library
(.27) and Ag Land levies. The property taxes as proposed are at the maximum allow-
able rates per State of Iowa Code. FY2000 property tax revenues are projected to be
916,093,567 or 4.5% greater than FY99. FY2001 is projected to increase by 2.5%
to 916,503,514 and by 1.4% to $16,732,903 in FY2002.
Transfer: Emilioyea Benefits Levv (12% of total) -- This property tax revenue is
receipted into the Employee Benefits Fund and then transferred to the General Fund to
pay for benefits of employees (employer share of FICA, IPERS and Police and Fire
Pension contributions; health premiums, etc.). FY2000 transfers are estimated to be
94,008, 171.
Road Use Tax (9% of total) -- This is a gas tax that is received by the State of Iowa
paid to the City on a per capita basis, receipted into the City Road Use Tax Fund and
then transferred to the General Fund to pay the actual costs of the Traffic Engineering
and Streets Divisions less other revenues received by these divisions and a forestry
position that is directly related to the maintenance of City street right-of-way. FY2000
transfers are estimated to be 92,996,429.
- 24 -
State/Federal Fundin.~ (5% of total) -- The revenue sources that are received from the
State of Iowa consist of state aid, personal property replacement tax, bank franchise
tax, library open access and a new reimbursement for loss of revenue from machinery
and equipment. The State remits state aid and personal property replacement revenue
to the City in two equal installments, one in December and the other in March.
All of the state revenues are budgeted at approximately the FY99 budget level and
reflect no increases in future years.
Six police officers were added in FY96, with salaries and benefits funded from a
Federal Crime Grant. Two additional officers were hired as part of that grant in July
1998. The City will be paying the first six officers from General Fund monies starting
in FY99. Salaries and benefits of the last two officers will be paid from the grant in
FY99 and FY2000. A new federal crime grant will allow the City to hire six more police
officers in FY2000. The grant is a maximum of $150,000 per year for three years
which is 75% of salaries, not including benefits.
Chargeback of Services (3% of total) -- This revenue source consists of administrative
charges to the Enterprise Funds (Ex.: Water, Parking, Wastewater, etc.) for services
provided in the Finance and Public Works Administrative Divisions, use of the Docu-
ment Services Division, use of Central Services, Cable TV support to the Library for
Audio Visual Lab services and a City Attorney chargeback for services.
Fines, Permits and Fees (8% of total) -- This category includes a variety of different
revenue sources. The largest are Recreation fees, building permits and inspections,
parking fines, library services and magistrate court fines.
Contractual Services (4% of total) -- Included in this revenue line item is the contract
for Fire services provided to the University of Iowa.
Johnson County contracts with the City for the use of the Library and Senior Center
for residents who live outside the City limits of Iowa City but within Johnson County.
Hotel/Motel Tax (1% of total) -- This revenue is from the 7% hotel/motel tax that is
assessed to those establishments within the city limits of Iowa City. Actual receipts
are allocated as follows:
Police Patrol (50%), Convention and Visitors Bureau (25%), Parks and recreational
facilities (25%), The 25% amount that goes towards Parks and Recreation is being
receipted into Mercer Aquatics in FY99. Prior to FY99 Mercer Aquatics received 15%,
Parkland Acquisition 7%, and Parkland Development received 3%. In FY2000 Mercer
Aquatics will be returned to 15% and ScanIon Gymnasium will receive 10%.
All Other Income (Peninsula Property 4%, all other 7%} -- The largest revenue sources
in all other income are interest income, transfer of parking fines, transfer from Health
Insurance Reserve and Miscellaneous Income. TIF Interfund loan repayments are from
property taxes associated with the Villa Garden TIF project. The TIF debt repayments
will be completed in FY99. Parking fines in FY98 are for two years (FY97 and FY98).
FY99 and thereafter reflects the annual amount. Sale of the Peninsula property is
budgeted at 1.3 million in FY2000 as well as a one-time transfer in of $609,242 to
fund a 27th pay period in FY2000.
- 25-
CITY OF IOWA CITY
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY MAJOR CATEGORY
FOR FISCAL YEARS 1998 THROUGH 2002
10000 GENERAL FUND FY 98
RECEIPT TYPE ACTUAL
1 ) PROPERTY TAX
8.10 General Levy
.95 Transit Levy
.27 Library Levy
TOTAL PROPERTY TAX
2) TRANSFER: EMPL BENEFITS LEVY 3,526,150
3) ROAD USE TAX 2,657,467
4) STATE / FEDERAL FUNDING:
STATE AID (formerly Municipal 630,380
Assistance and Liquor Profits)
PERSONAL PROPERTY REPLACEMENT 321.117
LIBRARY-OPEN ACCESS 57.441
MACHINERY &EQUIP CREDIT 60.514
POLICE FEDERAL CRIME GRANT 287,059
POLICE-OTHER STATE GRANTS 121,085
BANK FRANCHISE TAX 180,770
TOTAL STATE FUNDING 1,658,366
5) CHARGEBACK OF SERVICES
ADMIN EXPENSE CHARGEBACK 964,955
CITY ATTORNEY CHARGEBACK 34,227
OTHER CHARGES FOR SERVICES
CABLE 'IV CHARGEBACK
WORD PROC/CENTRAL SERVICES 22,570
TOTAL CHARGEBACK OF SERVICES 1.021 ]52
6) FINES PERMITS & FEES
RECREATION FEES 620,010
BUILDING PERMITS &INSPECTIONS 477,034
PARKING FINES- $5 447,726
LIBRARY SERVICES 283,331
POLICE SERVICES 68,781
MAGISTRATES COURT 248,045
HOUSING PERMITS & INSPECTIONS 154,935
FOOD &LIQUOR LICEN &PERMITS 88,818
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 92,802
BUILDING &DEVELOPMENT FEES 37,686
CEMETERY FEES &CHARGES 40,355
TOTAL FINES PERMITS & FEES 2.559,523
7) CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
UNIVERSITY FIRE CONTRACT 798,260
JOHNSON COUNTY CONTRACT 378,983
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,177,243
8) HOTEL/MOTEL TAX 419,605
9) ALL OTHER INCOME
INTEREST INCOME 483,114
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 254,968
MONIES &CREDITS 28,863
MILITARY CREDIT 11.398
TRANSFER IN- HEALTH RESERVE 200,000
TRANSFER IN- 27TH PAYPERIOD
SALE OF LAND (Peninsula Property)
PARKING FINES TRANSFER TO GF 963,074
TIF INTERFUND LOAN REPAYMT 57.016
GRANTS-OTHER 10.150
TOTAL ALL OTHER INCOME 2,008,583
GRAND TOTAL REVENUES $ 29,922,998
FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02
RE-EST BUDGET PROJECTED PROJECTED
12,945,467 13,386,042 13,987,714 14,343,969 14,543.331
1,517,542 1,569,203 1,639,804 1,681,613 1,704,995
431.300 445,984 466,049 477,932 484,577
14,894.309 15.401.229 16,093,567 16,503,514 16,732.903
3,648,141 4,008,171 4,122,692 4,365,401
2,889,044 2.996,429 2,959,634 3,073,947
630,000 630,000 630,000 630.000
320,000 320.000 320.000 320,000
60,000 60,000 60,000 60.000
72,140 115,988 265,715
242,714 270,000 150,000 150,000
159,500 142,000 142,000 142,000
100,000 120,000 121,200 122,412
1,584,354 1,657,988 1,688,915 1,424,412
993,907 998,000 1,017,960 1,038,319
50,000 51,000 51.000 51,000
24,000 24,000 24.000 24.000
1,067.907 1,073,000 1,092,960 1,113,319
642,513 740,998 711,440 718,261
432,740 436.500 438.075 439.666
455,000 455,000 455,000 455,000
230,943 229,664 235,931 232,950
44.415 50,415 50,415 50,415
159,000 220,000 220,000 220,000
140,400 140,400 141.750 143,114
93,595 90,900 90,900 90,900
98,500 108,519 108,416 108,318
37,000 39,000 39,000 39,000
30.000 30,000 30,000 30,000
2,364,106 2,541,396 2,520,927 2.527.624
803.862 851,626 868.659 886.032
387,146 395,496 405.036 412,703
1,191,008 1,247.122 1,273.6~5 1.298,735
456,787 460,667 464,695 469,342
450,000
467,923
28,000
11,500
200,000
440,000
50,000
1.647,423
$ 30,249,999
- 26 -
450,000
487,008
28,000
11,500
200,000
609.242
1,300,000
440,000
3,525,750
$ 33,604,090
450,000
460,308
28,000
11,500
200,000
440,000
1,589,808
32,216,840
450,000
461,528
28,000
11,500
200,000
440,000
1,591,028
32.596,711
C. GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES
The proposed General Fund expenditure budget in FY2000 is $31,640, 187 and is operationally
the same as the FY99 Budget for most departments. However, several departments have
expanded operations proposed in FY2000 which include new personnel. A total of 13.25 new
full-time equivalent positions are included in the FY2000 budget. The positions are: (6) Police
Officers associated with new Federal Crime Grant, (1) Police Sergeant, (1) Maintenance Worker
II - Parks, (1) Maintenance Worker III o Streets Division associated with a new snow route, (1)
Clerk Typist and (.50) Maintenance Worker I - Recreation Division related to expanded opera-
tions at Mercer Aquatics and ScanIon gym operations as well as additional registration abilities
to provide an alternate registration site for recreation programs, (2.25) FTE Library Maintenance
Worker 1 positions, in lieu of the current maintenance contract, and an additional .50 Mainte*
nance Worker I at the Senior Center. A comparison of dollars and percentage changes by major
classification of expenditure follows:
Description
FY98 FY99 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002
Actual Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed
Personal Services
Commodities
Services and Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Contingency
TOTAL
EXPENDITURES
$18,186,420 $19,484,565 920,602,483 $21,402,526 $22,723,868
947,019 1,170,932 1,082,252 1,106,035 1,138,660
5,276,353 5,504,105 5,477,208 5,334,599 5,492,221
1,381,140 1,898,406 1,634,396 1,220,255 1,029,023
3,290,749 3,042,755 2,543,848 2,666,432 2,773,938
0 217,954 300,000 300,000 300,000
929,081,68! ~31~318,7!7 931,640,187
932,029,847 S33,457,711
Percentage Change
From Prior Year
FY98 FY99 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002
Actual Budget Proposed Proposed Proposed
Personal Services 4.6% 7.1% 5.7% 3.9% 6.2%
Commodities 6.7% 23.6% -7.6% 2.2% 2.9%
Services and Charges 6.5% 4.3% - .5% -2.6% 3.0%
Capital Outlay 16,4% 37.5% -13.9% -25.3% -15,7%
Transfers 4.3% -7.5% -16.4% 4.8% 4.0%
Contingency 37.6% 0,0% 0.0%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5.5% 7.7% 1.0% 1.2% 4.5%
Personal Services
Personal services includes salaries and benefits (health, life, disability insurance and
employer share of FICA, IPERS, and Police/Fire retirement contributions. The FY2000
budget includes scheduled step increases, an estimated bargained adjustment and
includes one extra pay period.
Personnel costs are primarily controlled by collective bargaining agreements. Employ-
ees of the City are represented by three unions: AFSCME (Local #183), the Police
Labor Relations Organization (PLRO) Qf Iowa City, and the Iowa City Association of
Professional Fire Fighters, IAFF, AFL-CIO (Local #610). All supervisory, confidential,
temporary and other employees who are excluded by law in Chapter 20 of the Code of
Iowa are excluded from the units and from the terms, conditions or application of the
Agreement.
The majority of City employees are represented by AFSCME. This Union is comprised
of two bargaining units, one composed exclusively of Library employees and the other
composed of employees in all other departments. AFSCME ratified a two-year contract
that spans July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2001. This agreement included a 3%
adjustment to wages in July 1999 and 3% in July 2000, plus any step increases in
each fiscal year.
Sworn police officers are represented by the Police Labor Relations Organizations
(PLRO) of Iowa City. The bargaining unit is composed of all Iowa City police officers.
Exempt from the unit are the police chief, captains, lieutenants, sergeants, and other
confidential, administrative, supervisory and less than half-time employees. The PLRO
ratified a three-year contract that spans July 1, 1997 through June 30, 2000. This
agreement included a 3% adjustment to wages in July 1997, 3% in July 1998 and 3%
in July 1999, plus any step increases in each fiscal year.
The firefighters are represented by the Iowa City Association of Professional Fire
Fighters (IAFF), AFL-CIO (Local #610). The bargaining unit is composed of firefighters,
lieutenants, and captains. Exempt from the unit are the fire chief, fire marshal and
battalion chiefs. The IAFF and City ratified a three-year contract that spans July 1,
1997 through June 30, 2000. This agreement included a 3.25% adjustment to wages
in July, 1997, 2% in July 1998, 2% in January 1999, 3% in July 2000, plus any step
increases in each fiscal year.
Employees who are administrative, supervisory or otherwise ineligible for collective bar-
gaining are covered by the Personnel Rules and Regulations. Some are eligible for Civil
Service. Salaries and benefit appropriations are determined by the City Council upon
the recommendation of the City Manager· FY2000 through FY2002 adjustments to pay
plans for approximately 100 administrative and confidential employees will be the same
percentages as the AFSCME unit, per resolution adopted by the City Council.
Commodities
Commodities mainly consist of office and cleaning supplies, and maintenance and repair
materials for buildings, streets and equipment.
3. Services and Charges
Services and Charges cover expenses for Aid to Agencies payments, printing and
postage, various service contracts, repairs and maintenance to vehicles, equipment and
buildings, chargeback for internal service funds and utility costs.
The Aid to Agencies budget is partially funded from Community Development Block
Grant monies and the remainder funded from property tax revenues in the General
Fund. The City Council appropriates money annually to each agency. The FY2000 Aid
to Agency proposed budget is $447,000 ($105,000 CDBG, $342,000 General Fund).
Human services received FY2000 requests for funding totaling $466,890, an increase
of $57,190 or 14% more than the FY99 budget, excluding $20,000 FY99 Aid to
Agency Contingency budget. The following shows a detailed listing of the actual
funding of agencies from FY96 to FY98, the current budget for FY99, and the adopted
budget for FY2000.
An additional $49,250 is budgeted for various community spirit events and commission
support including Arts Festival, Jazz Festival, DTA Friday Night Series, Heritage Trees,
Historical Society, Economic Development Days and banners.
AID TO AGENCIES FUNDING
Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget
FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY2000
Big Brothers/Big Sisters $33,075 $33,600 $34,557
Crisis Center 31,200 33,000 35,480
Domestic Violence Program 44, 100 46,000 47,000
Elderly Services Agency 53,500 55,105 56,800
Emergency Housing Project 6,000 7,500 8,500
HACAP 6,240 6,240 6,425
Mayor's Youth Employment 35,000 36,000 37,080
MECCA 24,500 25,235 26,000
Rape Victim Advocacy 12,000 12,500 12,500
Red Cross 4,410 4,510 4,740
United Action for Youth 53,000 54,900 56,500
Neighborhood Centers 47,250 49,000 52,000
ICARE 8,925 9,200 9,600
Life Skills Housing 8, 119 -0- '0-
Free Medical Clinic 5,000 5, 180 5,440
ICARE (Needs assessment) -0- -0- -0-
DVIP (Needs assessment) 10,000 -0- -0-
GICHA (Operational) 20, 190 -0- -0-
MYEP (Operational) 13,888 -0- -0-
HACAP (Operational) 3,613 -0- -0-
Contingency -0- -0- 0
Subtotal $420,010 $377,970 $392,622
$36,000 38,150
37,254 38,672
50,000 51,673
58,500 60,255
9,000 9,225
7,625 7,850
38,000 40,450
26,800 27,872
13,000 13,500
4,977 5,155
58,000 60,450
54,844 57,836
10,000 10,250
5,700 5,985
-0- -0-
-0- -0-
-0- -0-
20,000 19,677
$429,700 $447,000
LESS: Amount Funded
Directly by CDBG (160,800) (105,000)
(104,991) (105,000) (105,000)
Net General Fund Total
$259,210 $272,970
$287~631
$324,700 $342,000
- 29 -
Transfers
Following is an itemized listing of actual transfers from the General Fund for FY97 and
FY98, the FY99 budget and proposed for FY2000, FY2001 and FY20C2.
GENERAL FUND
TRANSFER TO
Transit Levy
Airport Operations
Transit Operations
JCCOG
Information Services Operations
Employee Benefits Reserve
Trails
Intra City Trails
CIP-Civic Center, Airport. All Other
CIP-Peninsula Property Development
Equipment Division Loan
Landfill Loan Repay - Fire
Landfill - H.I.S. Loan Repay
Landfill - Mercer Gym Loan Repayment
Capital Projects
C/P-Park Renovation & Improvement
Recreation Center Remodeling
Library-Computer Replacement Reserve
Library-Cable Channel Replacement
Library-CIP-Building Design
Library Equip Repl Resrv - To New Fund
Separate from Gen Fund
Library Computer Repl Resrv - To New Fund
Separate from Gen Fund
Parking-Senior Center
Landfill-Loan Repayment-Sr. Center
CIP-Parks Land Acquisition
Parkland Acquis. Resrv - To New Fund Separate
from Gen Fund
Parkland Develop Resrv - To New Fund Separate
from Gen Fund
CIP-Park Development
Total Transfer from General Fund
FY97 FY 98
Actual Actual
1,478,950 1,517,541
92.750 67.885
252,083 161,530
85.975 85,657
491.934
200,000 200,000
(15,404)
(10.313)
299.298 390.386
3.780
29,250 25,979
FY99 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
Budget Budget Proposed Proposed
1,569.203 1,639,804 1,681,613 1,704,995
65,000 64,000 80,700 86,200
438,922 400,000 460,000 530,000
96,425 129,500 133.575 142,200
44,000
401.000
200,000
3,939
29,630
50,000 50,000 50,000
3,780 3,760 3,780
31,056 31.056 31,056
25,524 25,524 25,524
78,163 78,163 78,163
94,673 9.240 90,000
34,498
60,000 140,000 25.000 25.000 25,000
11.790 11,790 11,790 11.790 11,790
3,678
21,330
94,249
6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
30,000 61,867 61,846 79,231 79,231
3,047 -
442.962
50,553
7,040 -
3,155,250 3.290,750 3,042,755 2.543.848 2,666,432
25,000
11,790
6,000
79,231
2,773,939
5. Contingency
The FY99 original contingency budget was $270,000. Contingency in the past has
been set at approximately 1% of total expenditures. FY2000, FY2001 and FY2002
contingency is set at ~300,000 per year, which is less than 1% of expenditures.
- 30 -
D. GENERAL FUND YEAR-END CASH BALANCE
Starting on July 1, 1998 (FY99) the General Fund cash balance no longer includes reserves.
Reserves for Parkland Acquisition/Development, Library Computer Equipment Replacement,
AV/Public Access Equipment Replacement and State Reciprocal Borrowing were moved to
separate accounts outside the General Fund.
The City Council established guidelines starting in FY99 to maintain cash balances at approxi-
mately 20% of expenses. The following chart depicts the General Fund Operating Cash
position for fiscal years 1998 through 2002.
FY98 FY99 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002
Actual Budget Projected Projected Projected
Beginning Cash $ 9,134,547
Balance
Receipts 29,922,998
Expenditures (29,081,681)
Cash Balance $ 9,975,8_64
$ 9,975,864
30,249,999
(31,318,717)
88,907,146
33,604,090
(31,640,187
$ 8,907J4_6 $10,871,049
$10,871,049 $11,058,042
32,216,840 32,596,711
(32,029,847)(33,457,711}
$11,058,042 $10,197,042
Cash balance as
% of expenditures 34% 28% 34% 35% 31%
Although the cash balance percent of expenditures is higher than the 20% goal, the cash
balance will gradually move toward the 20% level.
The Operating Cash Fund Balance is used to provide for cash flow in the first quarter of the
next fiscal year because the majority of property taxes are not received until October/November
and cash balances are drawn down. The following chart shows cash flow needs or how
expenditures have exceeded receipts in the first three months for the past five years.
3 mos ~ Shortfall
Sept. 30 Receipts Expenditures in Receipts
1998 $3,903,84O $8,305,814 ($4,401,974)
1997 $4,712,408 $7,945,385 ($3,232,977)
1996 $4,370,161 ~7,601,889 ($3,231,728)
1995 $4,612,297 $8,637,663 ($4,025,366)
1994 $4,137,291 $6,690,150 ($2,552,859)
-31 -
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
The Enterprise Funds include Parking, Wastewater Treatment, Water, Refuse, Landfill, Airport,
Transit and Broadband Telecornmunications. These are primarily funded from user fees for
services provided with the exception of transit and airport. Transit and Airport receive most of
their funding from property taxes, federal and state grants, General Fund subsidy, and the
balance from fees. The other six funds are self-supporting from fees.
1. PARKING FUND
FY2001 and FY2002 revenue includes fees from the new ramp on Iowa Avenue. Parking
rates were increased last on August 8, 1996. Almost all of the Iowa Avenue revenue
from parking meters will be phased out over the next three years due to the proposed
landscaping project. There are no fee increases factored into the three year plan.
Parking fines are receipted into the parking fund to satisfy revenue requirements for
Parking Revenue bond covenants. If the bond covenants are satisfied and the cash
balance at year end is adequate, the revenue from fines is transferred to the General
Fund.
Parking operations in FY2001 reflect increased costs associated with operating the new
Iowa Avenue ramp similar to the Dubuque Street Ramp. Transfers ($1,836,760 in FY99)
are approximately one-half of the operating budget. FY2000 transfers (2,141,529)
include the funding for debt payments ($1,136,760) for three existing issues plus the new
1999 bond issue, parking fine transfer to the General Fund ($400,000), parking reserve
for ramp repairs ($170,000) and an operating subsidy to transit operations ($90,000).
2. TRANSIT FUND
For accounting purposes, the Transit Operating Fund is considered an enterprise fund,
which means fees pay for the majority of the costs associated with this fund; however,
fees are one of the smallest portions of this budget. The majority of the funding in the
Transit Fund is generated from a $.95 property tax levy on all taxable property within the
City of Iowa City. This generates approximately $1.64 to $1.70 million a year. In addi-
tion, the General Fund is projected to subsidize an additional $400,000, $460,000, and
$530,000 in 2000, 2001 and 2002 respectively and the Parking Fund subsidizes $90,000
per year.
1.50 FTE Transit Operator positions will be eliminated and 1.75 Customer Service
Representative positions will be added to provide dispatch coverage and public informa-
tion services at the new downtown interchange office.
Fare revenue reflects the loss of the Hawkeye route.
Federal grant revenue of $300,000 is projected to continue throughout the three year
plan, contrary to pdor year reports.
State grant revenue is estimated to be approximately $296,000 per year.
The three-year plan reflects no funding to the Transit Replacement Fund. The City will
pay for their portion of any new bus purchases through loans that are repaid from the
debt service property tax levy. Staffing for the free shuttle is included in all three years.
See page 88 for a summary of bus fare revenue by source and the percentage change from the previous
year.
- 32 -
3. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FUND
The wastewater treatment fund reflects the most recent 15%, 10% and 10% rate increases
enacted for bills on or after March 1, 1996, 1997 and 1998 respectively. The three year
plan reflects increases of 10% on or after August 1, 1999. A 5% increase is factored in
for August 1 of 2000 and 2001 but no increase is planned for several years after that. The
rates, as proposed, comply with the City Council's direction of accumulating cash of 20%
(approximately $7.6 million) of the cost of the wastewater projects. The three year plan
reflects utilizing the $7.6 million cash accumulated to fund the one year debt service
reserve on bonds issued in 1999 and 2000 and part of the project costs. Interest income
reflects earnings on all Wastewater Funds including the reserves.
$300,000 of new expenses have been added in FY2002 when the new plant is anticipated
to be operational. Transfers are the largest portion (74%) of the operating budget.
Transfers fund principal and interest payments on debt that has or will be issued, one year
debt service reserve requirements and Capital Improvement Program projects. The three-
year plan reflects debt service transfers for principal and interest payments on existing
debt issued in 1993, 1996 and 1997 and $7.0 million to be issued in CY99, $10.5 million
in CY2000 and 15.5 in CY2001.
WATER FUND
The water fund reflects the most recent 30%, 20% and 15% user fee rate increase
enacted for bills on or after March 1, 1996, 1997, and 1998. Water fees reflect increases
of 15% and 10% for billings on or after August 1, 1999 and 2000, respectively. The rates,
as proposed, comply with the City Council's direction of accumulating cash of 20%
(approximately $10.7 million) of the cost of the water projects. This cash will be used to
pay for part of the project costs. In addition, a portion of the $10.7 million will be used to
fund the one year debt service reserve on bonds issued in 1999, 2000, and 2001.
Expenses reflect one new position in FY2000. An additional $300,000 of expenses were
added in FY2002 when the new plant is projected to be on line. Transfers include the
water portion of general obligation debt that has been issued, new revenue bond debt and
funding for the one year debt service reserve. The three-year plan reflects debt service
transfers for principal and interest on new revenue bond issues projected in CY99 of $7.7
million, $4.8 million in CY2000 and $27.0 million in CY2001.
REFUSEFUND
There are no significant changes in operations in the three year financial plan. The
monthly fee of $11.55 for curbside refuse ($8.75) and recycling ($2.80) is proposed to be
reduced to $11.00 due to the tipping fee being reduced by $10 per ton in January, 1999.
LANDFILL FUND
The Landfill tipping fee was reduced ten dollars per ton on January 1, 1999 as a result of
the Landfill long range plan. Revenues reflect 75,000 tons of garbage per year being
billed. Any major reduction in tonnage at the landfill will impact the operations. There are
no significant changes in operations in the three year plan. A transfer from the operating
fund to landfill replacement reserve was reduced from $1.7 million to $300,000 in FY99
and then maintained at $300,000 for each year. The transfer is used to pay the cost of
constructing new landfill cells, purchase of additional landfill land, and any major capital
projects that are needed at the landfill. Separate reserves have been established for
Closure and Post Closure Landfill cell costs and special cleanup for paints, batteries, and
toxic chemicals.
7. AIRPORT
Revenues reflect increased rental income from the new corporate hangar. The Airport
operating fund reflects no significant change in operations. A quarter time maintenance
worker has been added in FY2000 and again in FY2001. Transfers include a loan repay-
ment to the Landfill Reserve fund for three T-Hangars. The General Fund subsidy is
approximately 21% of the airport operating budget.
8. BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
This fund accounts for the Cable 'IV operations of the City. The funding source is a 5%
cable franchise fee which is part of the monthly bill for Cable 'IV as well as a $.50 pass
through fee for local programming which was added in FY97. The City also receives
funding for Public Access 'IV (PATV) and then remits that amount to them. Transfers
include an operating subsidy to the Library for cable TV of $44,753 in FY2000 and
increasing to $48,000 by FY2002. In addition, $10,000 a year is transferred to the Cable
TV replacement reserve fund, which is used to replace equipment on an as-needed
basis.
DEBT SERVICE FUND
This fund provides for the payment of the principal and interest due on general obligation debt
of the City. Funding is provided by the Debt Service Property Tax levy and transfers from
various Enterprise Funds for their capital improvements which were funded by General Obligation
Bonds. Debt Service expenses in FY2000 through FY2002 include the bond issue of $9 million
in March, 1999, $11.3 million in 2000, $6.7 million in 2001 and $10.3 million in 2002. Debt
Service expenses related to the Library expansion bond issue are not included.
As stated in the City's Fiscal Policy, "Debt incurred as a general obligation of the City of Iowa
City shall not exceed statutory limits: presently 5% of the total assessed value of property within
the corporate limits as established by the City Assessor."
The following schedule shows the relation of Iowa City's allowable debt margin and the debt
incurred for FY92 through FY2002. The total property valuation amounts are actual for FY92-
FY99, but are estimates for FY2000 through FY2002.
Total Allowable Debt Debt as % of
Property Margin (5% of Outstanding Debt Allowable
Valuation Total Prol~ertv Val,) at July I Debt Margin
*FY2002 $2,518,961,372 $125,948,069 $53,870,000 43%
*FY2001 2,484,672,886 124,233,644 52,490,000 42%
*FY2000 2,416,782,699 120,839, 135 46,165,000 38%
FY99 2,371,395,259 118,569,763 41,675,000 35%
FY98 2,185, 166,884 109,258,344 31,390,000 <~> 29%
FY97 2,146,528,095 107,326,405 29,430,000 27%
FY96 1,866,504,330 93,325,216 26,580,000 29%
FY95 1,785,207,307 89,260,365 20,895,000 23%
FY94 1,602,123,581 80,106,179 15,930,000 20%
FY93 1,553,886,323 77,694,316 14,550,000 19%
FY92 1,413,801,924 70,690,096 14,985,000 22%
(1) Approximate 38% or 12.2 million is debt repaid by property taxes.
- 34 -
City of Iowa City
General Long Term Debt
Bonds issued in Millions
12
m Prop, Tax '"'! Enterprise
11
10
6,7G
4
3
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002
Enterprise: GO Bonds issued for enterprise funds. Debt to be paid/abated from user fees,
Preper~y Tax: GO Bonds issued for governmental funds, Debt to be paid from debt service levy,
35-
The Fiscal Policy also includes the guideline that "the debt service levy shall not exceed 25% of
the total levy in any one fiscal year." The following chart shows the debt service levy as a
percentage of the total levy for FY93 through FY2002. The levies for FY93-FY99 are certified; the
levies for FY2000-FY2002 are projected. (The State will certify the levy for FY2000 in June 1999.)
Debt
Total Levy Service Levy As % of Total
*FY2002 15.052 3.313 22%
* FY2001 14.471 2.887 20%
*FY2000 13.851 2.300 17%
* FY99 13.133 1.868 14%
FY98 12.796 1.615 13%
FY97 12.653 1.200 9.5%
FY96 12.992 1.709 13%
FY95 12.954 1.661 13%
FY94 12.889 1.496 12%
FY93 12.826 1.541 12%
*Estimate
AGENCY FUND
The Agency Fund budgets for Johnson County Council of Governments (JCCOG). The City acts
as custodian for the fund and provides accounting services. JCCOG provides county-wide
planning assistance for transportation, human services and solid waste planning.
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Internal Service funds include the Equipment Maintenance Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund,
the Central Supply and Print Shop Fund, the Risk Management Loss Reserve Fund, the Health
Insurance Reserve Fund and Information Services Fund (formerly a division within the General
Fund).
The Equipment Maintenance Fund provides maintenance for all City vehicles and equipment and
rents vehicles to other City departments from a central vehicle pool. Funding is provided from a
chargeback to all departments for the maintenance services and the rentals of vehicles.
The Equipment Replacement Fund. is used to replace almost all of the rolling stock of all. City
vehicles. Funding is provided from an annual chargeback to all departments based on the
estimated replacement value at the time of replacement.
The Central Services Fund covers the operation of the general office supply inventory, the print
shop, copiers, phone communications, mail services and radio maintenance. All of these functions
are available to all City departments who are charged based upon the services utilized.
The Risk Management Loss Reserve Fund accounts for the liability for all funds. All funds are
charged based on their loss experience and prorated a share of the insurance premium.
The Health Insurance Reserve accounts for the actual payment of all health and dental claims.
Premiums are based on actuarially sound estimates and charged to each department.
The Information Services Fund accounts for the operating support and replacement of all computer
equipment for all divisions except Library. All divisions are charged for computer operating support
and equipment replacement.
I. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
The Special Revenue Funds include the Employee Benefits Fund, Community Development Block
Grant Fund (CDBG), Road Use Tax Fund, Public/Assisted Housing and Special Assessments.
The Employee Benefits Fund accounts for the receipt of property taxes levied to pay the employer
share of benefits of employees in the General Fund. Transfers to the General Fund are made
from this fund.
The CDBG and Public/Assisted Housing Funds account for revenue from the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development programs and is restricted in use for eligible projects as defined
by Federal regulations.
The Road Use Tax Fund accounts for revenue from the State and is used to pay for street related
maintenance and planning, traffic engineering and street related construction costs.
RESERVEFUNDS
Several General Fund reserves have been segregated out of the General Fund in order to more
easily see the unrestricted General Fund balance. These include funds for Library Equipment
Replacement, Library Computer Replacement, Parkland Acquisition and Parkland Development.
The revenue bond ordinance covenants require that Parking and the Wastewater Treatment Fund
set aside these special accounts:
a)
b)
c)
Bond and Interest Sinking Reserves - amounts sufficient to pay current bond and interest
maturities. (Transfers from the appropriate operating fund are made monthly.)
Bond and Interest Reserves - balances to be maintained that are equal to the maximum
amount of principal and interest due on the bonds in any succeeding fiscal year. (Current
parking reserve balance is $369,000 and Wastewater balance is $5,706,001 at 6/30/98
and is budgeted to be $7,326,001 by 6/30/2000.)
Depreciation, Extension and Improvement Reserve or Renewal and Improvement Re-
serves - $240,000 transferred annually for Wastewater Treatment until a balance of $2
million is reached (current balance is $2,000,000) and $60,000 transferred annually for
Parking until a balance of $300,000 is reached (current balance is $300,000).
Parking, Landfill, Water and Broadband Telecommunications have separate reserves for future
capital expenditures. The Parking reserve is to be used for ramp repairs/maintenance, which is
performed biannually, and for a future parking facility. Landfill's reserve is to be used for the
purchase of additional land and cell construction, closure funding and a perpetual care fund. The
Water reserve is available to fund major capital improvement projects for the water plant in future
years. Future bus acquisitions will be funded from loans or bond issues. Broadband Tele-
communications' reserve is for future equipment replacement.
Z
Z
Z
- 38 -
Z
e
~w~
W~Z~
Z~WZ~
W~w
WW
z
z
z
z
z
0 ~
z~ ~ zz ~
0 z ~00 ~
_ ~www~ ~ ~~Q ~ z~~ O~z~
- 3g -
co
z
0
I-
O)
m 0
0 ~
Z~ ~
0 ~
- 40 -
~Z~ OZ~
Z
~~z~zu~ ~
z55wz~w~ <~ w
~O~w~z~
FY2000 -All Funds
Where the Money Comes From
Federal &
Bond
State Aid
Proceeds 9% Other
15% 4%
Interf urn
Transfers
34%
Where the Money Goes
Enterprise :,,,
Fund
27%
internal
Service
6%
Fines/Fees/
Permits
24%
Property
Taxes
14%
Capital
Projects
35%
\
Spec.
Revenue
Debt10%
Service
General 4%
Fund
(/)
n
Z
._1
._1
o~
Z
,t,
U, ~
n,
OW UaZ~ ~
~,w Ow ~ w
ZZ 00~w ~W ~ w
~ ~ o ~
00~~ z
ww ~ w
~ O0 O~Z ~
~ ~ ~000~ 0
-42-
W
~ ~ Z
~W~
~Z~
~ ~00~
~ ~ Z ~Z
5~azoz w
~O~ww~z~w~O~
z
z
z
-*-- ',, r~ *,F "Z
-43 -
SUMMARY OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN FUNDS
RECEIPTS - TRANSFERS IN
TRANSFER TO
TRANSFER FROH FYO0 FY01 FY02
GENERAL FUND:
NON-OPERATIONAL
ADMINISTRATION
Parking Supervision
Other Employee Benefits
Health Insurance Reserve
Employee Benefits Reserve
440,000
3,046,805
200,000
609,242
OPERATIONS AND
MAINTENANCE
Energy Conservation
27,000
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM Road Use Tax
7,500
440,000
3,141,137
200,000
7,500
440,000
3,315,138.
200,000
7,500
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
STREETS
FORESTRY
RECREATION
LIBRARY OPERATIONS
DEBT SERVICE:
ENTERPRISE FUNDS:
PARKING OPERATIONS
PARKING RESERVE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
RESERVE
WATER RESERVE
LANDFILL RESERVE
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
Employee Benefits Fund
Employee Benefits Fund
Road Use Tax
Road Use Tax
Road Use Tax
Energy Conservation
Broadband Telecommunications
SUBTOTAL GENERAl, FUND
Water Operations
Residual Equity - Use Existing Fund Balance
Wastewater Operations
SUBTOTAL DEBT SERVICE
Senior Center Operations
Parking Reserve
Parking Operations
Wastewater Operations
Water Operations
Interfund Loans
Landfill Operations
Non-Operational Admin.
Transit Levy from General Fund
Non-Operational Admin.
Parking Operations
- 44 -
579,465
400,097
886,513
2,060,616
41,800
33,000
44,753
8,376,791
!,831,538
240,097
847,409
2, 919,044
6,000
1,611,529
8,208, 164
1,764,000
309,675
300,000
64,000
1,639,804
400,000
90,000
591,634
408,499
889, i 73
2,019,961
43,000
46,556
7, 787,460
1,773,488
95,788
620, 878
2,490, 154
6,000
1,608,417
9,637,077
5,044,000
309,675
300,000
80,700
1,681,613
460,000
90,000
633,048
437,093
915,716
2, 103, 731
47,000
48,000
8, 147,226
1,706,056
508,425
2,214,481
6,000
110,000
1,437,844
8,448,232
4, 124,000
309,675
300,000
86,200
l, 704, 995
530,000
90,000
TRANSFER TO
TRANSIT RESERVE
BROADBAND RESERVE
SUMMARY OF TRANSFERS
RECEIPTS - TRANSFERS IN
TRANSFER FROH
Transit Opera[ions
Broadband Operations
SUBTOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS
BETWEEN FUNDS
FYO0
16,000
10,000
14,419, 172
FYO1
6,400
10,000
19,233,882
FY02
10,000
17, ! 56,946
OTHER FUNDS
]CCOG:
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ROAD USE TAX
CABLE CHANNEL REPLACEMENT
LIBR COMPUTER RESERVE
PARKLAND ACQUISITION
RESERVE
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS OPERATIONS
CAPITAL PROJECTS
Non-Operational Admin.
Landfill Surcharge Reserve
Road Use Tax
CBD Maintenance Operations
Special Assessments
Library Operations
Library Operations
ScanIon Gym Loan Repayment
Employee Benefits Reserve
Road Use Tax
General Fund - Non-Operational Admin.
Parking Renewal ez Impr. Reserve
Parkland Acquisition
Wastewater CIP Projects
Water CIP Projects
Water fund balance for new water plant
Wastewater Rev. Bond Transfers
Water Rev. Bond Transfers
G.O. Bond Transfers
Misc. Transfer
Capital Projects SubtoDI
SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS
129,500
72,600
125,380
3,780
23,501
11,790
25,000
22,332
585,000
2, 196,000
50,000
50,000
3,466,000
1 70,000
9,834,000
4,720,000
11,167,896
164,000
31,817,896
32,816,779
133,575
71,000
128,000
3,780
23,501
11,790
25,000
22,352
585,1300
900,000
50,000
300,000
100,000
1,820,000
170,000
4,000,000
15, 140,000
26,913,000
6,555,000
55,948,000
56,951,978
142,200
74,500
139,000
3,780
23,501
I 1,790
25,000
22,332
585,000
1,238,000
50,000
50,000
300,000
170,000
4,000,000
400,000
300,000
1 O, 147,000
368,000
17,023,000
18,050, 103
GRAND TOTAL
58,531,786
86,463,474
45,568,756
- 45 -
SUMMARY OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN FUNDS
DISBURSEMENTS - TRANSFERS OUT
TRANSFER FROM
GENERAL FUND:
NON-OPERATIONAL
ADMINISTRATION
CBD MAINT OPERATIONS
FIRE GENERAL ADM IN.
H.I.S. ADHINISTRATION
RECREATION
LIBRARY
ADHINISTRATION
SENIOR CENTER
OPERATIONS
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
PARKING SUPERVISION
PARKING RESERVE
WASTEWATER
OPERATIONS
WATER SUPERVISION
TRANSFER TO
DESCRIPTION
Airport Operations Airpor~ Subsidy
Transit Operations Transit Levy
Transit Operations Transit Subsidy
]CCOG Iowa City's Portion
Capital Projects Civic Center- Other Imprv.
Equipment Skid Steer Loader
Landfill Loan Repayment
Landfill Loan Repayment
Landfill Mercer Gym - Loan Repay
Equipment Repl. Reserve Computer Replacement
Reserve
Cable Channel
Equipment Repl. Reserve Replacement
Parking Operations Reserve Parking-Sr. Ctr.
Loan Repayment-Building
Landfill Reserve Improvements
SUBTOTAL GENERAL FUND
General Fund Admin.
Transit Operations
Renewal ~ Improy. Reserve
Bond e~ Interest Sinking
Capital Projects
Parking Supervision
Wastewater Sinking Fund
Wastewater Sinking Fund
Wastewater Sinking Fund
Wastewater Sinking Fund
Wastewater Sinking Fund
Wastewater Sinking Fund
Wastewater Reserve
Debt Service
Capital Projects
Capital Projects
Water Sinking Fund
Water Sinking Fund
Water Sinking Fund
Water Reserve
Debt Service
Depr., Ext., ez
Improvement
Reserve
Capital Projects
Return Parking Fines
Operating Subsidy
Parking Reserve
Revenue Bonds
Ramp Repairs
i 992 Final Debt Payment
1993 Revenue Issue
1996 Revenue Issue
1997 Revenue Issue
1999 Revenue Issue
2000 Revenue Issue
2001 Revenue Issue
98/99 Bond - 1 Yr Debt
Reserve
Abated G.O. Bonds
Wastewater Projects
New S. WWT Plant
1999 Revenue Issue
2000 Revenue Issue
20OI Revenue Issue
One Year Debt Reserve
Abated G.O. Bonds
For Future Improvements
Water CIP Projects
- 46 -
FYOO
64,000
1,639,804
400,000
! 29,500
50,000
3,780
31,056
25,524
78,163
25,000
11,790
6,000
79,231
2,543,848
440,000
90,000
170,000
1,441,529
3,455,564
1,388,387
772,213
648,000
972,OOO
972,000
847,409
300,000
3, 166,OOO
800,000
320,000
508,000
i,831,538
136,000
! 70,000
FYO 1
8 O, 700
1,681,613
460,000
133,575
50,000
3,780
3 ! ,056
25,524
78, 163
25,000
I i,790
6,000
79,231
2,666,432
440,000
90,000
170,000
1,438,417
300,000
3,451,314
i ,392, 138
785,625
648,000
972,000
1,194,000
i, i 94,000
620,878
300,000
], 52 O, 000
800,000
508,000
1,420,000
2, 180,000
1,773,488
136,000
4, 170,000
FY02
86,200
I, 704,995
530,000
142,200
50,000
3,780
3 ! ,056
25,524
78,163
25,000
11,790
6,000
79,231
2,773,939
440,000
90,000
170,O00
!,267,844
110,000
3,466,844
1,394,638
772,750
648,000
972,000
1,194,000
508,425
300,000
800,000
508,000
2,180,000
1,706,056
636,000
4, 170,000
SUMMARY OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN FUNDS
DISBURSEMENTS - TRANSFERS OUT
TRANSFER FROM
LANDFILL OPERATIONS
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
TRANSIT OPERATIONS
TRANSFER TO
Landfill Reserve
Capital Projects
CapiDI Projects
Capital Projects
]CCOG
Landfill Reserve
Transit Reserve
DESCRIPTION FY00
Excavation, Closures, Repl. 300,000
Public Works Complex
Senior Ctr Improy Projects
Airport SE T-Hangar
Solid Waste Planner
ez Grant 72,600
Loan Repayment-Hangers 118,033
Local Share Grant 16,000
BROADBAND
TELECOM MUNICATIONS General Fund, Library
A.V. Lab Suppo~
Replacement Reserve Equipment Replacement
SUBTOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS
OTHER FUNDS
PARKLAND ACQUISITION
RESERVE
DEBT SERVICE FUND
POLICE COMPUTER
REPLACEMENT
Capital Projects
1997 G.O. Bond Issue
Capital Projects
Land Acquisition
Cemetery Bldg. Expansion
Reduce 1997 G.O. Debt
Service Tax Levy
Local Share Grant
Building Repairs
Health Insurance
Maiden Lane Paving
Pension ez Retirement
Pension ez Retirement
General Fund Employee
Benefits
27th Payperiod Reserve
Police e~ Fire Benefits
Operations
Operations
Operations
Operations
Program for Improving
Neighborhoods
Airport Property
Development
Asphalt e~ Chip Seal
Brick Street Reconstruction
Creek/Drainage Maim.
Curb Ramps- A. D. A.
Dubuque Street Elevation
ENERGY CONSERVATION Government Buildings
HEALTH INSURANCE
RESERVE Non-Operational Admin.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
OPERATIONS
EHPLOYEE BENEFITS
RESERVE
Transfer to Road Use Tax
Police Dept
Fire Dept
Non-Operating Admin.
Non Operating Admin.
PUBLIC SAFETY RESERVE
ROAD USE TAX
Employee Benefits Op.
General Fund, Traffic Eng.
General Fund, Streets
Forestry
]CCOG-Trans. Planning
Neighborhood Services
Capital Projects
- 47 -
44,753
I 0,000
18,990,026
50,000
240,097
164,000
60,000
200,000
23,501
579,465
400,097
3,046,805
609,242
585,000
886,513
2,060,616
41,800
125,380
7,500
200,000
606,000
i 5,000
250,000
60,000
FY01
300,000
71,000
118,033
6,400
46,556
l 0,000
26,055,849
50,000
50,000
95,788
200,000
23,50 l
591,634
408,499
3,141,137
585,000
889, 173
2,019,961
43,000
128,000
7,500
50,000
60,000
15,000
FY02
300,000
368,000
74,500
i 18,033
48,000
10,000
22,253,090
50,000
200,000
23,501
633,048
437,093
3,315,138
585,000
915,716
2, 103, 731
47,000
139,000
7,500
220,000
15,000
!00,000
SUMMARY OF TRANSFERS BETWEEN FUNDS
DISBURSE!vfENTS o TRANSFERS OUT
TRAHSFER FROH
CAPITAL PROJECTS BOND
TRANSFERS
TRANSFER TO
DESCRIPTION FYO0 FYO 1 FY02
East West Arterial-
Scott to ACT 200,000
Entrances to City-
Beautl~cation Project 30,000 30,000 30,000
Extra Width Sidewalk 40,000 40,000 40,000
First Ave. Extended 100,000
Foster Rd/Dubuque
Intersection 75,000
Foster Road 400,000
Gilbert St IAIS Underpass 50,000
Hwy 6 Median, Sidewalk
and Drainage Improvmnt 100,000 100,000 S0,000
Intra City Bike Trails 30,000 30,000
Iowa Ave. Streetscape 200,000 200,000
Longfellow/Pine St
Ped/Bicycle Trail 50,000
Mormon Trek-Plaen View
/Hwy 1 100,000
Mormon Trek/Abbey Lane
Storm Sewer 75,000
Park Rd Bridge Approach 28,000
Pavement Markings SO,O00 50,000 50,000
P.C,C. Maintenance 100,000
RR Crossings-City Wide 20,000 20,000 20,000
Second Avenue Bridge 50,000
Sump Pump Discharge Tiles 25,000
Traffic Calming 25,000 25,000 25,000
Traffic Signals 120,000 130,000 35,000
Capital Projects
Capital Projects
Capital Projects
Wastewater Rev. Bonds 9,834,000 1 S, 140,000 400,000
Water Rev. Bonds 4,720,000 26,913,000 300,000
G.O. Bonds I 1,167,896 6,555,000 10,147,000
SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS
GRAND TOTAL
36,997,912 57,741,193 20,541,727
58,531,786 86,463,474 45,568,756
CITY OF IOWA CITY
AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL LISTING
FULL TIME EQUIVALENTS
FULL
TIME
7.00
4.00
City Council
City Clerk
Police Citizen's Review Board
City Attorney 6.00
City Manager 3.00
Human Relations 4.00
Finance 25.35
Government Buildings 2.33
Human Rights Activities 2.00
Planning & Comm. Develop. 8.45
Engineering 11.00
Public Works 2.00
CBD Maintenance 3.00
Energy Conservation 0.50
Police Protection 88.00
Fire Protection 52.00
Animal Control 5.00
Housing & Inspection Svcs. 13.00
Traffic Engineering 3.75
Streets Maintenance 23.00
Forestry Operations 3.00
Cemetery 3.00
Recreation 10.67
Parks 12.00
Library 29.50
Parks & Rec Dept. Admin. 2.00
Senior Center 5.00
Total General Fund 328.55
Parking System Operations 17.50
Wastewater Trmt Oper 25.30
Water Oper. & Maint. 25,95
Refuse Collection Operations 19.50
Landfill Operations 11.50
Airport Operations 1.00
Mass Transit Operations 32.50
Broadband Telecommunications 4.00
Total Enterprise Fund 137.25
I.S. Police Grant 1.00
Sewer Connection o N & S Plant 5.00
Capital Improvement Projects
Library Dev. Office Salary 1.50
J.C.C.O.G. 5.80
Information Services 5.00
General Fleet Maintenance 8.70
Equipment Replacement 0.30
Central Sup. &Print 1.20
Assisted Housing 11.00
Risk Management 1.30
Misc. Community Development 1.10
Employee Benefits 0.15
CDBG Metro Entitlement 3.15
Total Other Funds 45,20
Grand Total 511.00
FY99 FY2000 TO
PART FULL PART FY2000
TIME TOTAL TIME TIME TOTAL CHG
- 7.00 7.00 7.00
0.50 4.50 4.00 0.50 4.50
0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 -
- 6.00 6.00 6.00 -
3.00 3.00 3.00 -
4.00 4.00 4.00 -
3.25 28.60 24.50 3.21 27.71 (0.89)
1.75 4.08 2.33 1,75 4.08
2.00 2.00 2.00
8.45 8.55 8.55 0.10
11.00 10.60 10.60 (0.40)
2.00 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00 3.00
0.50 0.50 0.50
1.25 89.25 95.00 1.25 96.25 7.00
52.00 52.00 52.00
0.50 5.50 5.00 0.50 5.50
1.13 14.13 13.00 1.13 14.13
3.75 4.15 4.15 0.40
23.00 23.50 23.50 0.50
3.00 3.00 3.00
3.00 3,00 3.00 -
2.50 13.17 12.67 2.00 14.67 1.50
- 12.00 13.00 13.00 1.00
8.50 38.00 30.50 9.75 40.25 2.25
- 2.00 2.00 2.00
0.50 5.50 5.00 1.00 6,00 0.50
20.38 348.93 339.30 21.59 360.89 11.96
13.00 30.50 17.50 13.00 30.50
- 25.30 25.30 25.30
- 25.95 26.20 26.20 0.25
- 19.50 20.35 20.35 0.85
- 11.50 11.50 11.50
0.50 1.50 1.00 0.75 1.75 0.25
15.50 48.00 33.50 14.75 48.25 0.25
0.75 4.75 4.00 t .25 5,25 0,50
29.75 167.00 139.35 29.75 169.10 2,10
- 1.00 - - (1.00)
- 5.00 5.00 5.00
- 2,00 2.00 2.00
- 1.50 1.50 1.50
- 5.80 6.10 6.10 0.30
0.50 5.50 7.45 0.50 7.95 2.45
- 8.70 8.70 8.70
0.50 0.80 0.30 0.50 0.80
0.50 1.70 1.60 0.50 2,10 0.40
0.75 11.75 10,00 0.75 10.75 (1.00)
0.29 1.59 1.30 0.26 1.56 (0.03)
0.20 1.30 1.10 0.20 1.30
0.23 0.38 0.15 0,30 0.45 0.07
0.30 3.45 3.15 0.30 3.45
3.27 48.47 48.35 3.31 51.66 3.19
53.40 564.40 527.00 54.65 581.65 17.25
- 49 -
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY2000 ADDITIONAL POSITIONS REQUESTED
POSITIONS REQUESTED- FUNDED IN FY2000 FINANCIAL PLAN
iDepartment
Police
Police
Police
Police
Police
Police
Police
* Total Police Department
Position FTE Wages Benefits
Police Sergeant 1.00 51,358.89 15,724.19
Police Officer 1.00 31,613.79 12,032.19
Police Officer 1.00 31,613.79 12,032.19
Police Officer 1.00 31,613.79 12,032.19
Police Officer 1.00 31,613.79 12,032.19
Police Officer 1.00 31,613.79 12,032.19
Police Officer 1.00 31,613.79 12,032,19
7.00 241,041.63 87,917.33
Streets Supervision
Maintenance Worker III
General Recreation Admin
Recreation
Parks Oper & Maint
* Total Recreation
Clerk Typist
Maintenance Worker I - Gym
Maintenance Worker II
1.00 34,682.16 10,512.52
1.00 26,186.72 9,281.23
0.50 12,652.52 4,475.00
1.00 27,956.26 9,538.26
2.50 66,795.50 23,294.49
General Library Library Maintenance Worker I 1.00
General Library Library Maintenance Worker I 0.75
General Library Library Maintenance Worker I 0.50
* Total Library 2.25
Senior Center Operations Maintenance Worker I
I** Total General fund Positions Requested and Funded:
Total
67 083.08
43 645.98
43 645.98
43 645.98
43.645.98
43 645.98
43 645.98
328 958.96
45,194.68
35,467.95
17, 127.52
37,494.52
90,089.99
25,305.04 9,153.11 34,458.15
18,978.78 6,709.91 25,688.69
12,652.52 4,475.00 17,127.52
56,936.34 20,338.02 77,274.36
0.50 12,284.81 4,423,15 16,707,96
13.25
Water Plant Operations Electronics Technician 1.00
Transit Operations Customer Service Representative 1.00
Transit Operations Customer Service Representative 0.75
Transit Operations Mass Transit Operator (1.50)
1) 1.50 FTE transit operator positions will be eliminated and 1.75 Customer Service
representative positions will be added to provide dispatch coverage and public
information services at the new downtown interchanf:3e office.
I**Total Enterprise Funds Positions Requested and Funded: 1.25
Capital Improvement Projects Sr. Engineering Technician
Capital Improvement Projects Senior Engineer
* Total Capital Improvement Projects
411,740.44 146,485.51
558,225.95 I
36,067.51 10,712.23 46,779.74
36,331.19 10,749,19 47,080.38
27,247.62 7,838.58 35,086.20
(51,059.16) (15,679.34) (66,738.50)
48,587.16 13,620.66
Maintenance Worker
Admin Clerk/Typist
Webmaster
1.00 31,836.27 10,099.67
1.00 43,761.61 11,849.51
2.00 75,597.88 21,949.18
0.25 6,890.70 2,315.72
62,207,82
Airport
Information Services
Information Services
* Total Information Services
I** Total Other funds Positions Requested and Funded:
[** Grand Total New Positions Requested and Funded FY2000:
41,935.94
55,611.12
97,547.06
9,206.42
0.50 14,056.41 4,673.20 18,729.61
1.00 40,386.30 11,357.02 51,743.32
1.50 54,442.71 16,030.22 70,472.93
3.75 136,931.29 40,295.12
18.25 597,258.89 200,401.29
177,226.41
797,660.18
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY2000 ADDITIONAL POSITIONS REQUESTED
POSITIONS REQUESTED - NOT FUNDED IN FY2000 FINANCIAL PLAN
IDepartment
Position FTE Wages Benefits
PCD Administration Public Art Coordinator
Urban Planning & Dev Associate Planner
* Total Planning & Comm Development
Engineering
Police Patrol
Police Patrol
Police Records
Police Emergency Comm
Police Emergency Comm
Police Emergency Comm
* Total Police Department
Clerk Typist
Juvenile Police Officer
Juvenile Police Officer
Police Records Clerk
Emerg Comm Dispatcher
Emerg Comm Dispatcher
Emerg Comm Dispatcher
Fire - Public Education
Fire Emergency Oper
Fire Emergency Oper
Fire Emergency Oper
* Total Fire Department
Assistant Fire Marshal
Firefighter
Firefighter
Firefighter
Parks Supervision
Parks Oper & Maint
* Total Parks
Natural Areas Manager
Maintenance Worker II
Senior Center Operations Clerk Typist
Senior Center Operations Maintenance Worker I
* Total Senior Center
J** Total General fund Positions Requested, Not Funded:
Water Supervision Special Projects Inspector
Landfill Supervision Clerk Typist-WWTD/Landfill
~'*Total Enterprise Fund Positions Requested, Not Funded:
Information Services Data Communications Analyst
Purchasing Division Mail Clerk
J** Total Other funds Positions Requested, Not Funded:
~** Grand Total New Positions Requested, Not Funded FY2000:
I** GRAND TOTAL OF ALL NEW POSITIONS REQUESTED:
Total I
0.50 20,196.24 5,503.92 25,700.16
0.50 20,196.24 5,503.92 25,700.16
1.00 40,392.48 11,007.84 51,400.32
1.00 26,186.72 9,281.23 35,467.95
1.00 31,613.79 12,032.19 43,645.98
1.00 31,613.79 12,032.19 43,645.98
1.00 27,043.68 9,518.59 36,562.27
1.00 31,836.27 10,213.07 42,049.34
1.00 31,836.27 10,213.07 42,049.34
1.00 31,836.27 10,213.07 42,049.34
6.00 185,780.07 64,222.18 250,002.25
1.00 48,910.58 16,373.41 65,283.99
1.00 34,677.01 13,711.19 48,388.20
1.00 34,677.01 13,711.19 48,388.20
1.00 34,677.01 13,711.19 48,388.20
4.00 152,941.61 57,506.98 210,448.59
1.00 37,325.14 10,912.17 48,237.31
1.00 27,956.26 9,538.26 37,494.52
2.00 65,281.40 20,450.43 85,731.83
0.50 13,093.36 4,534.07 17,627.43
1.00 29,018.19 9,691.34 38,709.53
1.50 42,111.55 14,225.41 56,336.96
15.50 512,693.83 176,694.07 689,387.90
1.00 39,892.93 11,266.31 51,159.24
0.50 13,093.36 4,534.07 17,627.43
1.50 52,986.29 15,800.38 68,786.67
1.00 40,386.30 11,357.02 51,743.32
0.25 6,798.00 2,303.30 9,101,30
1.25 47,184.30 13,660.32 60,844.62
18.25 612,864.42 206,154.77 819,019.19
36.50 1,210,123.31 406,556.06 1,616,679.37
CITY OF IOWA CITY
FY2000 ADDITIONAL POSITIONS REQUESTED
POSITIONS REQUESTED - RECOMMENDED IN FY2OOf - FY2002
JDepartment Position FTE FY00 FY01
Fire Department 3 Firefighters in FY01 3.00 148,068.30
Fire Department 3 Firefighters in FY02 3.00
* Total Fire Department 6.00 148,068.30
Airport Operations Maintenance Worker in FY01 * 0.25 9,206.42 18,872.42
Information Services Data Comm Analyst - FY01 1.00 54,330.00
I** Total Recommended Positions FY2001 - 2002: 7.25 9,206.42 221,270.72
FY02
152,510.35
152,510.35
152,510.35 I
* Airport Maintenance Worker reflects a recommended increase from .50 to .75 FTE in FY2000 and to 1.00 FTE in FY2001.
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
Financial Plan Summar,/
Summary ot Receipts and
General Fund Reserves'
Expenditures
GENERAL FUND
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY02
FY98
ACTUAL
Beqlnnln~ Balance 9,134,547
Property Taxes 12,945,467
Trans;l Levi,` 1,517,542
Llbraly Levy 431,300
Monles & Credits Tax 28,863
Military Credits 11,398
Personal Property Replacement 321,117
M & E Eredins 60,514
Licenses & Permits 88,8!8
Building Permils & Inspections 477,034
Housir.g Permlts & Inspections 154,93~
Cemetery Fees & Charges 40,355
Magistra:es Court Flnes& Fees 248,045
Parking Fines 447,726
Charges For Services 6,284
Recreation Fees 62C,010
Police Services 68 781
Ur:iversity F~re Contract 798,260
Animal Ccntrol Services 92,802
Bid9 & Development Fees 37,686
L~Dra~y Services 283,331
Fees Contracted Serv1ces 378,983
Admit Expense Chargeback 987,525
State Population Allocation 630,380
Bank Franchise Tax 180,770
Other SLate Grants 131,235
Hotel'Motel Tax 419,605
Libzary Open Access =n,441
Federal Crime Grant 287 059
lnLeresL Income 483,i14
Miscellaneous Revenue 68,55~
Sale cf LanJ 0
Loan Repa}~ents 20,050
City Attorney Chargeback 34,227
Transfer from Road Use Tax 2,657,467
Transfer: Employee Benefits 3.526,150
Transfer from Parking Fund 963,074
Transfer From Reserves 2O0,CC0
Misce]ianeous Transfer 160,077
TIC interfund Loan Repayment 57.016
Total Receipts 29,922,998
Personal Services 18,186,420
Commodi-~ies 947,019
Serv:ces And Charges 5,276.353
Capi%~l Outlay 1,381,140
Transfers 3,290,w49
Contangency 0
Total Expenditures 29,081,681
FY99
ESTIMATE
9975,864
!3,386,042
1,569,203
445,984
28,080
11,58C,
320,0~,3
72,140
93,595
432,740
!40 400
30,000
159 000
455 000,
9 890
642 513
44 415
803 862
98 5C8
37 000
230 943
387 146
1,017 907
630 000
100 000
159 500
456 787
60 OS, C
242 714
453000
438,033
0
0
50,000
2,889,044
3,648,141
440,000
200,000
0
50,0,05,
30,249,999
191484,565
1,170,932
e/504,105
i~898,406
3,042,755
217,954
31,3181717
DEPT
REQUEST
22,666,390
1,195,652
5,867,280
I,?94,596
2,543,848
300,000
34,387,766
FYC8 BUDGET
FINAL
BUDGET
5,907,146
13,987,714
!,639,804
46~,049
28,000
11,500
320,000
115,988
90,900
436,500
145,495
3O,0CC
220,006
455,000
7,562
748,998
50,415
851,~26
105,519
39,000
229 664
395 496
1.022 000
630 000
120 000
142 000
460 667
68 880
270 00C,
450
452 446
1,303 0CO
C
51,000
2,996,429
4,008,171
440,000
809,242
27,000
0
33,604,090
20,602,483
1,082,252
5,477,205
1,634,396
2,543,848
300,000
31,640,187
ELiIns Balance
9,975,864 8,907,146
10,871,049
FYC!
PROJECTION
10,871.049
14,343,969
11681,613
477,932
28,000
11,500
320,000
265,7!5
9O,90t
438,075
141,750
3C.,00~:
220,00C:
455,000
7,4E0
711,440
5C',4!5
868,659
108,416
39,000
235 931
405 036
1,041 960
630 000
121 2~C
142 0CO
464 695
6C CO0
150 00C'
450 O0C
452 82~
0
0
51,000
2,959,634
4,122,692
440,000
20u,008
0
32,216,840
21,402,526
1,106,035
5,334999
1,220,255
2,666,432
300,000
32,029,847
11,058.042
FY,3L
[RGjEiTI ON
11,058,042
14,543.331
1,704,99[
484,577
2~,800
11,500
32C;,000
9
9C',93'C
439666
143 1!4
3 G, 000
220,000
455,08~
~,43C
718,261
5C,418
886,332
178,318
39,000
232 950
412 703
1,062 319
63C 300
122 412
142 ,SO0
469 342
d'l '300
150 000
45,1
454 128
C
3
51,000
3,0v3,947
4,365,401
440,C, 3,3
200,03'3
0
C
32,596,711
22,723,868
1,!38663
[,492,221
1,029,323
2,7'~i.~3p
31'C,0:i'3
3i,457,71!
1'3,197,042
- 53-
CITY OF IOWA CITY
GENERAL FUND
EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY DIVISION
FINAL BUDGET FOR FY00 FY02
FY98 FY99 FY00 FYC1 FY02
ACTIVITY ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED PRSJECTZON PRCJETTION
City Council 82.286 94,865 88.9!7 89,292 92.549
City Clerk 385,507 349.584 353,024 321.376 36~.273
City Attorney 347.011 423.407 409.124 416,107 436.643
Year 2000 Census .2 2.000 8,313 C. 0
City Manager 357.837 385.446 388.313 385.2]6 401.556
Human Relazions 281.1!i 343,815 3!5.622 321.001 339.56}
Finance Admlnlstratlon 325.247 net 783 28C.212 291.342 31t.664
AcCounting & Reporting 454.987 475~780 488.539 495.09[ 527.708
Central Procuremen~ & Services 209,550 214.419 206,526 203.73,6 213.949
Treasury 703/930 7261919 794.581 811.886 846167,9
Document Services 2CI.930 223,843 230,701 212,608 223.098
Information Services 155.023 152,909 0 C, C:
Risk Management 460,41C: 0 0 C C
Government Bulldlngs 281.838 325.426 3291772 30!3.838 311.426
Human Rmghts ActivIties 124/743 145.499 146,727 148,871 155~967
Non-operational Admln 2.828.137 3.374/664 3.125.944 3.258.792 3.376.874
P C D Administration 201.721 161.550 169.489 169.737 178.318
Urban Planning & Development 246,415 290,985 323,704 328.206 342.3!~
Neighborhood Services 8C.631 104.927 1141655 I15~757
Communlty Dev Non grant 55.285 219.041 164,481 165,932 169.11~
Economic Development 12C.876 136.406 139.916 140.612 !44.587
Comprehensive Plan Update ~91 0 C' C C
Planning & Developmen~ Grants 6.945 C C C 6
Engineering 532.006 780.45~ 7!7.603 685.367 71P.059
Public Works Administration 153,674 161,799 162,529 164,861 l'l 35.1~
C B D Maintenance 243.25! 283.106 352,368 328,014 341.982
Energy Conservation AdmLn 19,991 36.384 38.610 37.!55 39.t. 89
Police Department 5,662,380 6.140,014 6.464.817 6.66C.802 6.86S65C
F~re Department 3,277,655 3,651,090 3,587.874 3.9!!.071 4172.~33
Animal Control 257 716 331,723 306.624 327.431 326.809
H I S Administration 200 189 261.616 234,309 236,984 247.448
Building Inspection 369 574 403.281 406,077 41D,476 430,668
Housing Inspection Services 222 119 233,022 246,866 249.971 262.3'11
Traffic Englneerlng 827 516 838,692 906.198 909.956 93e984
Street System Maintenance 1.807 144 2,017,423 2.C76.945 2,037,363 2.1211810
Forestry/horticulture 269 167 271.263 261,087 271,605 317,846
Cemetery 199 239 230,232 229,531 23315!5 238,755
Recreation 1.891 827 2.0111016 21415.225 2,334113C 2.332119t
Parks 776 941 1.219.310 1.097,715 1.06,3.768 1.049i3~
Library i.003 615 3.037.094 3.134.454 3.129.271 3.279.941
Library Special Revenues 141 223 123.188 83,440 78,088 81.!75
Parks & Recreation Admln 164 278 170.78[ 206.77i 170.325 178.711
Senlor Center 541 071 644,956 634,584 616,339 586,684
Library A. V. Equip. Replace. 21,330 0 0 0 C
Park Land Acqulsltlon Res 442,962 0 0 C,
Library Computer Replacement 94,249 0 0 C,
Parkland Development Reserve 5. S'.553 0 0 0
GRiLND TOTAL 29.081.681 31,318,717 31.640.187 32,029.847 33,45~,711
- 54 -
General Fund
Where the Money Comes From
Road Use Tax
9%
Intergov.
5%
Property Taxes
Other
15%
Where the
Fines/Fees/
Licenses
11%
Money Goes
Parks/Rec
Fire 16%
{ ihrary
a,dmin./Rnance
14%
Pul3hc Works
12%
Subsidy
7%
~i;!:hhnglHSgJ
St. Ctr.
8%
CITY OF IOWA CITY
ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPTS SUMMARY
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RECEIPTS
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL FY01
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET PROJECTION
FY02
PROJECTION
Monies & Credits 28,863 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000
Military Credit 11,398 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500
Personal Property Replacement 321,117 320,000 320,000 320,000 320,000
Machinery/Equip. Credit 60.514 72,140 115,988 265,715 0
Licenses & Permits 84,866 88,800 86,300 86,300 86,300
Magistrates Court 248.045 159.000 220.000 220,000 220,000
Parking Fines 447,726 455,000 455,000 455,000 455,000
Charges For Services 1,056 4,000 4,162 4,080 4,000
Johnson County Contract 300 0 0 0 0
Admin Expense Chargeback 875,525 902,547 904,000 921,600 939,552
State Population AllOC. 630,380 630,000 630,000 630,000 630.000
Bank Franchise Tax 180,770 100,000 120,000 121,200 122.412
State Grants 650 0 0 0 0
Hotel/Motel Tax 116,557 114,197 115,000 116,150 117,312
Interest Income 483,114 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 21,159 409,350 409,350 409,350 409,350
Sale Of Real Estate 0 0 1,300,000 0 0
Loan Repayments 50 0 0 0 0
City Attorney Chargeback 34,227 50,000 51,000 51;000 51,000
Transfer: Empl Benefits 2,766,000 2,801,717 3,046,805 3,141,137 3,315,138
Transfer-Parking Fund 963,074 440,000 440,000. 440,000 440,000
Transfer From Reserves 200,000 200,000 809,242 200,000 200.000
Miscellaneous Transfer 160,077 0 27,000 0 0
TIF Intrfnd Loan Repaymnt 57,016 50,000 0 0 0
TOTAL 7,692,484 7.286.251 9,543,347 7,871,032 7,799,564
CITY OF IOWA CITY
GENERAL FUND
ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISIONS EXPENDITURES SUMMARY
FINAL BUDGET FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01
ACTIVITY ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED PROJECTION
City Council 82,286
City Clerk 385,507
City Attorney 347,011
Year 2000 Census 0
City Manager 357,837
Human Relations 281,111
Finance Administration 325,247
Accounting & Reporting 454,987
Central Procurement & Services 209,550
Treasury 703,930
Document Services 201,930
Information Services 155,023
Risk Management 460,410
Government Buildings 281,838
Human Rights Activities 124,743
Non-operational Admin. 2,828,137
GRAND TOTAL 7,199,547
94 865
349 584
423 407
2 000
388 446
343 815
297 783
475 780
214 419
.726 919
223 843
152 909
0
325,426
145,499
3,374,664
7,539,359
88,917
353,024
409,124
8,313
388,313
315,622
280,212
488,539
206,526
794,581
230,701
0
0
329,772
146,727
3,125,944
7,166.315
89,292
321,376
416,107
0
385,216
321,001
291,342
495,095
203,706
811,886
212,608
0
0
300 838
148 871
3,258 792
7,256 130
FY02
PROJECTION
92,549
366,273
436,643
0
401,556
335,565
310,664
527,708
213,949
846,670
223,098
0
0
311,426
155,967
3,376,874
7,598,942
- 56 -
GENERAL FUND
POLICY & ADMINISTRATION
City Council
City Clerk
City Attorney
2000 Census
City Manager
Human Relations
Finance
Government Buildings
Human Rights
Non-Operational Administration
Aid fo Agencies Funding
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR
FINANCIAL
CITY COUNCIL
PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
43,253 43,253
3,410 2,995
51,727 42,669
0 0
98,.390 88 917
41,135 43,253
1,960 2,310
36,289 47,982
2,902 1,320
82,286 94,865
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
44,161 46,444
2,380 2,436
42,751 43,669
0 0
89,292 92,549
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
6.00 6.00
1.00 1.00
7.00 7.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
FY00
EXPENDITURES:
CITY CLERK
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 217,575 228,430 245,196 227,937 233,068 245,224
Commodl=ies 3,082 3,285 3,336 2,930 2,986 3,071
Services And Charges 97,666 93,138 128,100 121,457 85,322 117,978
Capital Outlay 67,184 24,731 700 700 0 0
Total 385,507 349,584 377,332 353,024 321,376 366,273
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK/TYPIST
LICENSE SPECIALIST
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK
MINUTETAKER
ASSISTANT TO PCRB
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
· 50 ,50
.50 .50
5.00 5.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
i File Stamp Clock
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
297,428 361,477 380,781 353,544
10,706 10,163 11,495 10,095
31,734 51,767 47,714 45,485
7,143 0 0 0
347,011 423,407 439,990 409,124
--- FTE "-
PERSONAL SERVICES: FY99 FY00
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK/TYPIST 1.00 1.00
LEGAL ASSISTANT 1.00 1.00
ASST CITY ATTORNEY 2.00 2.00
FIRST ASST CITY ATTORNEY 1.00 1.00
CITY ATTORNEY 1.00 1.00
6.00 6.00
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
361,707 380,666
10,786 11,098
43,614 44,879
0 0
416,107 436,643
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
FY00
700
700
FYO0
NOTE: See ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY for detailed receipts,
YEAR 2000 CENSUS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
- FY02
-~ FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal services 0 0 2,153 2,153 0 0
Commodities 0 0 2.000 1.756 0 0
Services And Charges 0 2,000 6.000 4,404 0 0
Total 0 2.000 10,153 8,313 0 0
CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 292,170 295,286 328,614 305,712 312,064 327,296
Commodities 10,731 3,282 5,402 4,743 4,867 5,005
Servlces And Charges 54,873 86,669 97,341 77,858 68,285 69,255
Capital Outlay 63 3,209 0 0 0 0
Total 357,837 388,446 431,357 388,313 385,216 401,556
--- FTE
PERSONAL SERVICES: FY99 FY00
ADMIN ASSIST TO CITY MGR 1.00 1.00
ASST CITY MANAGER 1.00 1.00
CITY MANAGER 1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
FY00
HUMAN RELATIONS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 173.748 218,155 245,076 228,024 233.421 245,605
Commodities 4,192 7,301 4,850 4,260 4,533 4,664
Services And Charges 101,197 107,959 101,582 83.338 83,047 85,296
Capital Outlay 1.974 10,400 0 0 0 0
Total 281,111 343.815 351,508 315,622 321,001 335,565
--- FTE ---
PERSONAL SERVICES: FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
PERSONNEL ASSISTANT
PERSONNEL GENERALIST
PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATOR
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1,00 1.00
4.00 4.00
FYO0
NOTE: See ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY for detailed receipts.
- 58 -
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
FINANCE ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-~ FY00 BUDGET -~
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
236,438 241,364 221,665 206,581
1,355 772 848 744
87,054 55,647 75,451 72,887
400 0 0 0
325,247 297,783 297,964 280,212
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
211,283 222,299
739 759
79,320 87,606
0 0
291,342 310,664
PERSONAL SERVICES:
BUDGET MANAGEMENT ANALYST
ASST FINANCE DIRECTOR
FINANCE DIRECTOR
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
.55 .10
1.00 1.00
.63 .57
3.18 2.67
FY00
ACCOUNTING & REPORTING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 323,988 339,682 361,796 336,956 344,889 362,747
Commodities 1,450 3,617 2,353 2,066 2,016 2,130
Services And Charges 121,494 121,481 144,405 137,517 148,190 162,831
Capital Outlay 8,055 11,000 12,000 12,000 0 0
Total 454,987 475,780 520,554 488,539 495,095 527,708
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ACCOUNT CLERK - ACCTNG
SR ACCOUNT CLERK - ACCTNG
SR ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLERK
SR PAYROLL CLERK
SR ACCOUNTANT - ACCOUNTING
CONTROLLER
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
7.0O 7.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Micro Computer Equipment
1 Micro-Computer Software
FY00
6,000
6,000
12,000
EXPENDITURES:
CENTRAL PROCUREMENT & SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 182,417 189,666 185,644 173,483 177,498 186,696
Commodities 668 753 1,095 962 917 944
Services And Charges 25,217 21,600 28,423 27,081 25,291 26,309
Capital Outlay 1,248 2,400 5,000 5,000 0 0
Total 209,550 214,419 220,162 206,526 203,706 213,949
--- FTE "-
PERSONAL ~ERVICES: FY99 FY00
BUYER II 1.90 1.50
PURCHASING AGENT .90 .90
CENTRAL SERVICES INFO CLERK 1.26 1.26
4.06 3.66
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Workstation
FY00
5,000
5,000
NOTE: See ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY for detailed receipts.
EXPENDITURES:
FINANCIAL
TREASURY
PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 425,803 447,399 479,442 447,506 458,026 481,879
Commodities 1,834 1,735 4,299 3,775 3,173 3,910
Services And Charges 275,322 264,399 351,617 339,985 346,991 359,411
Capital Outlay 1,171 13,386 33,315 3,315 3,696 1,470
Total 703,930 726,919 868,673 794,581 811,886 846,670
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ACCOUNT CLERK - TREASURY
SR ACCOUNT CLERK - TREASURY
CUSTOMER SERVICE REP
SR ACCOUNTANT - TREASURY
CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGER
CASHIER - TREASURY
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.38 1.38
10.38 10.38
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Chair, Task
1 Check Protector/Signer
FYO0
735
2,580
3,315
EXPENDITURES=
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
DOCUMENT SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
173,041 175,799 195,242 181,653
5,540 7,407 10,485 9,208
17,451 17,487 21,889 20,340
5,898 23,150 19,500 19,500
201,930 223,843 247,116 230,701
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
185,773 195,457
7,979 8,207
18,856 19,434
0 0
212,608 223,098
PERSONAL SERVICES:
DOCUMENT SPECIALIST
DOCUMENT SERVICES SUPV
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Dictation System, Doc. Svcs.
1 Software
FY00
1B,000
1,500
19,500
INFORMATION SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Services And Charges 155,023 152,909 0 0 0 0
Total 155,023 152,909 0 0 0 0
RISK MANAGEMENT'
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Services And Charges 460,410 0 0 0 0 0
Total 460,410 0 0 0 0 0
NOTE: See ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY for detailed receipts.
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Service8
Coa~aodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES:
GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
FINA/~CIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
141,238 147,367 160,952 151,034
20,780 22,406 21,244 18,657
112,728 130,553 134,588 127,381
7,092 7,100 32,700 32,700
0 18,000 0 0
281,838 325,426 349,484 329,772
--- FTE
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
M.W. I - GOVMT BLDG8 1.00 1.00
M.W. II - GOVERNMENT BLDNGS 1.00 1.00
SR M.W. - RECREATION .33 .33
CUSTODI/%N 1.75 1.75
4.08 4.08
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
154,707 162,769
19,635 20,200
124,596 126,957
1,900 1,500
0 0
300,838 311,426
31 Dual Window Panes - Repl.
1 Counter, Office
1 Floor Tile Replacement
1 Restroom sink, co~tnter, faucet
81 Window Panes - Resealed
HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVITIES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
EXPEN'DITI/RES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
Personal Services 101,768 114,406 128,034 119,374
Commodities 1,318 3,730 3,045 2,674
Services And Charges 19,683 23,693 27,614 24,679
Capital Outlay 1,974 3,670 0 0
Total 124,743 145,499 158,693 146,727
FY00
13,000
1,200
3,500
1,000
14,000
32,700
PERSONAL SERVICES:
~ RIGHTS INVESTIGATOR
PrUM_~N RIGHTS COORDINATOR
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
121,994 128,387
2,844 2,925
24,033 24,655
0 0
148,871 155,967
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
FY00
NOTE: See ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY for detailed receipts.
-61 -
NON- OPERATIONAL ADMIN.
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FYO1 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Commodities 34 0 34 30 27 27
Services And Charges 424,778 509,160 534,571 542,610 552,877 563,452
Capital Outlay 0 5,000 0 0 0 0
Transfers Out 2,403°325 2,642,550 2,283,304 2,283,304 2,405,888 2,513,395
Contingency 0 217,954 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
Total 2,828,137 3,374,664 3,117,909 3,125,944 3,258,792 3,376,874
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
i Contingency
FY00
300,000
300,000
TRANSFER TO:
CIVIC CENTER - OTHER 50,000
Transit Levy 1,639,804
Airport SubSidy 64,000
Transit Subsidy 400,000
Multi Co Assessmt 13,750
JCCOG-Human Services 57,200
JCCOG-Administration 58,550
2,283,304
AID TO AGENCIES FUNDING
Actual Actual Actual
FY96 FY97 FY98
Big Brothera/Big Sisters $33,075 $33,600 $34,557
Crisis Center 31,200 33,000 35,480
Domestic Violence Program 44, 100 46.000 47,000
Elderly Services Agency 53.500 55,105 56,800
Emergency Housing Project 6.000 7,500 8,500
HACAP 6,240 6.240 6,425
Mayor's Youth Employment 35,000 36,000 37,080
MECCA 24,500 25.235 26,000
Rape Victim Advocacy 12,000 12.500 12.500
Red Cross 4,410 4,510 4,740
United Action for Youth 53,000 54,900 56,500
Neighborhoed Centers 47.250 49.000 52,000
ICARE 8,925 9.200 9,600
Life Skills Housing 8,119 -0- -O-
Free Medical Clinic 5.000 5, 180 5.440
ICARE (Needs assessment) -0- -0- -0-
DVIP (Needs assessment) 10.000 -0- -O-
GICHA {Operational) 20, 190 -0- -O-
MYEP {Operational) 13,888 -0- oO-
HACAP (Operational) 3,613 -0- o0-
Contingency o0- -0- 0
Subtotal $420,010 $377,970
S392,622
LESS: Amount Funded
Directly by CDBG (160,800) (105,000) (104,991l
Net General Fund Total
$259,210 ~272,970 ~
BudgN Budg~
FY99 FY2000
$36,000 38.150
37,254 38.672
50,000 51.673
58,500 60,255
9,000 9,225
7.625 7,850
38,000 40,450
26,800 27.872
13,000 13,500
4,977 5,155
58,000 60,450
54.844 57,836
10,000 10.250
-0- -0-
5.700 5.985
-0- -0-
-0 - -0 -
-0- -O-
-0- -0-
20,000 19,677
9429,700 $447.000
(105,000) (]05,000)
$324,700 ~
NOTE: See ADMINISTRATIVE RECEIPT SUMMARY for detailed receipts.
GENERAL FUND
HOME& COMMUNITY
ENVIRONMENT
Planning & Community Development
Engineering
Public Works Administration
C.B.D. Maintenance
Energy Conservation
Traffic Engineering
Street System Maintenance
Forestry
Cemetery
P C D ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
RECEIPTS: ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 201,378 161,550 169,489
Miscellaneous Revenue 343 0 0
Total 201,721 161,550 169,489
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
169,737 178,318
0 0
169,737 178,318
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
165,108 139,731 185,210 148,652
1,580 2,692 2,150 1.887
34,812 16,327 18,396 17,595
221 2,800 1,355 1.355
201,721 161,550 207,111 169,489
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
151.939 159,872
1.875 1.927
15.923 16.519
0 0
169,737 178,318
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ENGINEERING TEC}~qICIAN
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
PCD DIRECTOR
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
.40 .50 8 Chair, Side
.55 .55 1 Table, worktable
1.00 1.00
1.95 2.05
FY00
1,040
315
1.355
RECEIPTS:
URBAN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 215.248 263,185 293.904
Building & Develop. Fees 30.280 27,000 29,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 887 800 800
Total 246,415 290,985 323,704
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
298.406 312.518
29,000 29,000
800 800
328.206 342,318
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 202,895 207,653 255.750 223.289 228,416 240,330
Commodities 1,684 1,634 1,816 1.594 1,648 1,695
Services And Charges 41,836 81,698 103,059 98,821 98,142 100,293
Total 246.415 290,985 360,625 323,704 328,206 342,318
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
SENIOR PLANNER
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2.50 2.50
1.00 1,00
3.50 3.50
FY00
- B3 -
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Road Use Tax
Total
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
80,631 89,927 107,155
0 15,000 7,500
80,631 104,927 114,655
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
108,257 112,308
7,500 7,500
115,757 119,808
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
56,230 62,784
514 720
16,808 16,423
7,079 25,000
80,631 104,927
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
68,546 64,400 65,901 69,327
54 48 46 47
25,392 25,207 24,810 25,434
25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
118,992 114,655 115,757 119,808
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Prog. to Imprv. Neighborhoods
FY00
25,000
25,000
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Miscellaneous Revenue
Total
COMITY DEV.
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
NON-GRANT
- FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
55,283 219,041 164,481
2 0 0
55,285 219,041 164,481
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
165,935 169,116
0 0
165,935 169,116
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 48,171 56,512 61,981 57,652 59,017 62,104
Commodities 129 664 992 871 929 957
Services And Charges 2,985 7,865 5,996 5,958 5,989 6,055
Capital Outlay 4,000 154,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Total 55,285 219,041 168,969 164,481 165,935 169,116
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORD
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
.80 .80
.20 .20
1.00 1.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2 Land Acquisition
FY00
100,000
100,000
- 84 -
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
RECEIPTS: ACTUAL ESTIMATE BEGET
Property Tax 100,565 136,206 139,716
Miscellaneous Revenue 311 200 200
Loan Repayments 20,000 0 0
Total 120,876 136,406 139,916
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
140,410 144,387
200 200
0 0
140,610 144,587
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 58,583 59,909 68,582 64,436 65,843 69,280
Commodities 351 1,131 1,098 964 894 919
Services And Charges 61.942 75,366 77,804 74.516 73,873 74,388
Total 120,876 136,406 147,484 139,916 140,610 144,587
PERSONAL SERVICESr
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
--~ FTE
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
FY00
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Total
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Total
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
591 0 0
591 0 0
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0
0 0
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
52 0 0 0
92 0 0 0
447 0 0 0
591 0 0 0
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
RECEIPTS:
State Grants
Total
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT GRANTS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
9,500 0 0
9,500 0 0
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0
0 0
EXPENDITURES:
Services And Charges
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
6,945 0 0 0
6,945 0 0 0
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0
0 0
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Bldg Permits & Inspect
Charges For Services
Building & Develop. Fees
Miscellaneous Revenue
Total
FINANCIAL
ENGINEERING
PLAN FOR FY00
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
500,960 761,805 691,953
21,392 8,000 15,000
384 150 150
7,406 10,000 10,000
1,864 500 500
532,006 780,455 717,603
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
659,717 693,409
15,000 15,000
150 150
10,000 10,000
500 500
685,367 719,059
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
441,528 689,378 669,312 585,886
6,061 9,019 8,544 7,504
68,958 79,282 96,280 82,213
15,459 2,776 42,000 42,000
532,006 780,455 816,136 717,603
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
599,601 631,007
6,985 7,182
78,781 80,870
0 0
685,367 719,059
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR I
SR ENGINEERING TECH
SPECIAL PROJECTS INSPECTOR
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR II
SURVEY PARTY CHIEF
SR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR
CIVIL ENGINEER
CI~ ARCHITECT/ENERGY COORD
SR ENGINEER
CITY ENGINEER
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
.50 .10
1.00
1-00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
.50 .50
3.00 3.00
1-00 1.00
11.00 10.60
Photocopier
Computer scanner
CD Rom Writeback Device
Imaging Software
FY00
16,000
5,500
500
20,000
42,000
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Admin Expense Chargeback
Miscellaneous Revenue
Total
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
41,664 46,439 44,529
112,000 115,360 118,000
10 0 0
153,674 161,799 162,529
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
44,501 50,583
120,360 122,767
0 0
164,861 173,350
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
149,198 154,965
264 448
4,212 6,386
0 0
153,674 161,799
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
165,144 153,255
539 473
9,314 8,476
325 325
175,322 162,529
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
156,771 164,932
504 518
7,586 7,900
0 0
164,861 173,350
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
CAPITJ~L OUTLAY:
File, Lateral
FY00
325
325
C B D MAINTENANCE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
RECEI~S:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 237,571 276.311 345,768
Licenses & Permits 3,952 4.795 4,600
Miscellaneous Revenue 1.728 2,000 2,000
Total 243.251 283,106 352,368
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
321,414 335,382
4,600 4,600
2,000 2,000
328,014 341.982
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
145,557 174,920 227,525 218,731
9,259 17,567 15,937 13,994
63,810 63,232 70,912 62,543
20,845 23,448 53,320 53,320
3,780 3,939 3,780 3,780
243,251 283,106 371,474 352.368
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
223,521 235,078
15,127 15,563
62,406 63,641
23,180 23,920
3,780 3.780
328,014 341,982
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. I - CBD
SR M.W. - CBD
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
2 Radios, Portable
20 Trash Receptacles
1 Tree / Shrub Replacements
1 Chipper/Shredder
1 Power Vacuum
1 C.B.D. Plaza Fixtures
1 Surface Repairs
FY00
1.600
5,300
2,850
7.500
25,000
5,000
6,070
53.320
TRANSFER TO:
To EMS for Skid Steer Loader
3,780
3,780
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Total
EXPENDITURES:
ENERGY CONSERVATION ADMIN
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
19,991 36,384 36,610
19,991 36,384 36,610
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
37,155 39,088
37,155 39,088
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 17,973 34,799 37,492 34,716 35,468 37,322
Commodities 23 33 25 22 24 25
Services And Charges 1,995 1,552 1,958 1,872 1,663 1,741
Total 19.991 36,384 39,475 36,610 37,155 39,088
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CITY ARCHITECT/ENERGY COORD
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
.50 .50
.50 .50
FY00
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
RECEIPTS: ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 4 1,154 15,685
Miscellaneous Revenue 5,378 4,000 4,000
Road Use Tax 822,134 833,538 886,513
Total 827,516 838,692 906,198
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
16,783 17,268
4,000 4,000
889,173 915,716
909,956 936,984
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES=
CLERK/~"fPIST - SOLID WASTE
SR CLERK/TYPIST - STREETS
ELECTRICIAN
ELECTRONICS TECH/TRAFFIC ENG
ASST SUPT STREETS/TRAFFIC
SUPT-STREETS/SOLID WST/TRAFF
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
276,248 202,356 248,975 233,734
111,777 105,463 167,022 162,364
438,169 498,173 491,809 490,100
1,322 32,700 20,000 20,000
827,516 838,692 927,806 906,198
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.25
.50
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
.25 .50
.25 .15
3.75 4.15
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Cargo Van
1 Radios, Portable
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
239,259 251,692
173,696 178,730
497,001 506,562
0 0
909,956 936,984
FY00
18,000
2,000
20,000
STREET SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RE CE I PTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Property Tax 0 13,917 15,329
Miscellaneous Revenue 7,404 1,000 1,000
Road Use Tax 1,799,820 2,002,506 2,060,616
Total 1,807,224 2,017,423 2,076,945
16,402 16,879
1,000 1,000
2,019,961 2,103,731
2,037,363 2,121,610
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
976,188 1,176,682 1,398,398 1,272,041
208,081 236,439 231,541 218,668
494,871 575,887 519,124 502,836
128,004 28,415 83,400 83,400
1,807,144 2,017,423 2,232,463 2,076,945
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,301,939 1,369,608
233,052 239,789
502,372 512,213
0 0
2,037,363 2,121,610
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. I - STREETS
SR CLERK/TYPIST - STREETS
M.W. II - STREETS
M.W. III - STREETS
SR M.W. - STREETS
ASST SUPT STREETS/TRAFFIC
SUPT-STREETS/SOLID WST/TRAFF
--- FTE
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
7.00 7.00
.75 .50
6.00 6.00
6.00 7.00
2.00 2.00
.75 .50
.50 .50
23.00 23.50
1 Curb, Gutter and Brick Repairs
12 Ton Dump Truck(s)
3 Snow Blade
1 Sanding Spreader
FYO0
10,000
53,000
15,900
4,500
83,400
FORESTRY/HORTICULTURE
FINANCIAL PLAiq FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
RECEIPTS: ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 233,579 233,263 219,287
Miscellaneous Revenue 75 0 0
Road Use Tax 35,513 38,000 41,800
Total 269,167 271,263 261,087
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
228,605 270,846
0 0
43,000 47,000
271,605 317,846
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIFATE REQUEST Bb'DGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 191,903 171,394 181,890 172,788 176,885 186,084
Commodities 3,948 7,852 5,700 5,004 5,155 5,302
Services And Charges 66,177 86,092 78,961 72,945 72,765 74,160
Capital Outlay 7,139 5,925 12,850 10,350 16.800 52,300
Total 269,167 271.263 279,401 261,087 271,605 317,846
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. - FORESTRY
M.W. II - FORESTRY
SR MW- FORESTRY
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00 1 RE-LEAF Program
1 · 00 1.00 1 Trees
i. O0 1.00 1 Saw, Chain
3.00 3.00
FY00
7,500
2,200
650
10,350
CEMETERY
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
RECEIPTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 158,884 200,232 199,531
Cemetery Fees & Charges 40,355 30,000 30,000
Total 199,239 230,232 229,531
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
203,515 208,750
30,000 30,000
233,515 238,750
~- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 160,723 170,074 193,798 183,632 187,932 197,662
Commodities 7,248 10,048 8,553 7,508 7,484 7,692
Services And Charges 30,598 37,536 33,326 31,631 31,564 31,996
Capital Outlay 670 12,574 6,760 6,760 6,535 1,400
Total 199,239 230,232 242,437 229,531 233,515 238,750
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. II - CEMETERY
M.W. III- CEMETERY
SR M.W. - CEMETERY
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Chair, Task
1 Monument Lifter
1 Radios, Portable
1 Asphalt Overlay
11 Tree / Shrub Replacements
1 Trailer(s)
FY00
580
900
750
1,500
1,230
1,800
6,760
- 70 -
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNITY PROTECTION
Police
Animal Control
Fire
Housing & Inspection
RECEIPTS:
POLICE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 4.533,372 4,973,727 5,i92,937
Police Services 68,781 44,415 50.415
State Grants 121,085 159,500 142,000
Hotel/Motel Tax 233,114 228,393 230,000
Federal Crime Grant 287,059 242,714 270,000
Transfer: Empl Benefits 418,969 491,265 579,465
Total 5,662,380 6,140,014 6,464,817
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
5,494,453 5,658,564
50,415 50,415
142,000 142,000
232,300 234.623
150,000 150.000
591,634 633,048
6.660,802 6,868,650
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Tonal
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
4,707,080 4,979,565 6,031,159 5,415,039
190,464 230,942 224,414 197,078
461,932 555,795 710,226 602,671
283,230 373,712 258,729 250,029
19,674 0 0 0
5.662.380 6,140,014 7.224.528 6,464,817
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
5,540,135 5,829.208
188,174 192,053
604,728 606,889
327,765 240.500
0 0
6,660,802 6,868,650
PERSONAL SERVICES:
POLICE RECORDS CLERK
SR POLICE RECORDS CLERK
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
EMERGENCY COMM DISPATC]{ER
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK/TYPIST
ADM SECRETARY/RECORDS SUPV
EMERGENCY COMM SUPERVISOR
POLICE SERGEA/gT
POLICE LIEUTENANT
POLICE CAPTAIN
POLICE CHIEF
POLICE OFFICER
POLICE SERGE~agT
EMERGENCY COMM DISPATCHER
--o FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
5.00 5.00
9.00 9.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
8.00 8.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
53.00 59.00
1-00
1.25 1.25
89.25 96.25
FY00
3 Workstation 12,000
6 Chairs, for Conference Table 1,500
4 Chair, Task 1,800
1 Chair, Side 400
2 Chair, Dispatcher 1,200
3 Chair, Desk 1.885
1 Communication Surveillance Dev 2,500
1 Video Printer - Police 2,000
1 Computer scanner 800
1 Printer, Laser - Color 400
9 Micro Computer, Laptop 26,000
1 Lockers 600
1 File, Lateral with overhead 1,500
3 Carpet 9,000
1 Shelves, Cupboards 3,500
4 Police Squads 90,640
2 Unmarked police vehicles 36.000
1 Vehicle, 4 x 4 21,000
14 Squad Car Rear Seats - Plastic 6,400
7 Cages for Squad Cars 4,060
2 Camera, 35 MM 3,384
1 Lite Bars for Squad Cars 2,320
8 Siren Units for Squad Cars 960
1 Special Team Weapons 3,800
6 Sidearm Weapons 2,580
1 Camcorder 3,000
20 Shotguns - Police 10,800
250.029
POLICE ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
RECEIPTS: AC'fUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 246,221 304,016 327,401
Police Services 5,013 4,000 5,000
Transfer: Empl Benefits 19,807 11,866 21,701
Total 271,041 319,882 354,102
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
341,722 343,027
5,000 5,000
22,157 23,708
368,879 371,735
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
CapiUal Outlay
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET -~
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
227,015 234,619 320,614 302,350
6,363 4,498 6,321 5,552
35,610 79,542 61,653 42,700
2,053 1,223 4,200 3,500
271,041 319,882 392,788 354,102
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
309,146 324,734
5,505 5,646
53,378 41,355
850 0
368,879 371,735
PERSONAJ~ SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK/TYPIST
POLICE CAPTAIN
POLICE CHIEF
POLICE SERGEANT
~-- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
3.00 4.00
CAPIT,lL OUTLAY:
1 Carpet
FY00
3,500
3,500
RECEIPTS:
POLICE PATROL
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 2,701,983 3,001,147 3,124,715
Police Services 56,844 37,815 42,815
State Grants 52,534 101,500 84,000
Hotel/Motel Tax 233,114 228,393 230,000
Federal Crime Grant 287,059 242,714 270,000
Transfer: Empl Benefits 325,077 394,700 459,199
Total 3,656,611 4,006,269 4,210,729
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
3,404,045 3,485,575
42,815 42,815
84,000 84,000
232,300 234,623
150,000 150,000
468,842 501,661
4,382.002 4,498,674
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 3,156,425 3,307,610 3,974,841 3,637,511 3,722,121 3,917,188
Commodities 158,032 177,237 180,724 158,714 150,308 153,118
Services And Charges 139,961 161,391 259,046 195,375 192,558 197,068
Capital Outlay 202,193 360,031 219,129 219,129 317,015 231,300
Total 3,656,611 4,006,269 4,633,740 4,210,729 4,382,002 4,498,674
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CO~EMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
POLICE SERGEA2~T
POLICE LIEUTENANT
POLICE CAPTAIN
POLICE OFFICER
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
4.00 5.00
6.00 6.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
45.00 50.00
59.00 65.00
- 72 o
FY00
6 Chairs, for Conference Table 1,500
4 Chair, Task 1,800
1 Chair, Desk 785
1 Communication Surveillance Dev 2,500
t Lockers 600
8 Micro Computer, Laptop 24,000
20 Shotguns - Police 10,800
6 Sidearm Weapons 2,580
1 Special Team Weapons 3,800
8 Siren Units for Squad Cars 960
1 Lite Bars for Squad Cars 2,320
2 Camera, 35 MM 3,384
7 Cages for Squad Cars 4,060
14 Squad Car Rear Seats - Plastic 6,400
1 Carpet 2,500
1 Shelves, Cupboards 3,500
4 Police Squads 90,640
2 Unmarked police vehicles 36,000
1 Vehicle. 4 x 4 21,000
219,129
POLICE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RECEIPTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Property Tax 363,862 444,185 449,736
State Grants 68.551 58,000 58,000
Transfer: Empl Benefits 51,896 61,696 73,419
Total 484,309 563,881 581,155
452,600 477,201
58,000 58,000
74,961 80,208
585,561 615,409
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
454,518 528,045 588,705 551,599
2,520 5,671 2.685 2,357
16.007 23,028 22,832 19,399
11,264 7,137 15,800 7,800
484,309 563,881 630,022 581,155
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
564,087 593,385
2,418 2.486
19.056 19,538
0 0
585,561 615,409
PERSONAL SERVICES:
COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER
POLICE SERGEANT
POLICE LIEUTENANT
POLICE OFFICER
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1 Camcorder
1.00 1.00 1 Video Printer - Police
1.00 1.00 1 Micro Computer, Laptop
6.00 7.00 1 Computer scanner
9.00 9.00
FYO0
3,000
2,000
2,000
800
7,800
POLICE RECORDS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
RECEIPTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 348,815 383,204 411,428
Police Services 6,924 2,600 2,600
Transfer: Empl Benefits 8,260 8,698 9,653
Total 363,999 394,502 423,681
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
420,421 440,049
2,600 2,600
9,856 10,546
432,877 453,195
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 229,237 239,448 299,268 245,269 250,996 264,037
Commodities 8,099 10,644 10,574 9,285 9,277 9,524
Services And Charges 114,746 141,089 182,105 167,227 165,404 171,634
Capital Outlay 11,917 3,321 1,900 1.900 7,200 8,000
Total 363,999 394,502 493,847 423.681 432,877 453,195
PERSONAL SERVICES:
POLICE RECORDS CLERK
$R POLICE RECORDS CLERK
ADM SECRETARY/RECORDS SUPV
POLICE SERGEANT
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.00 1,00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Chair, Side
1 File, Lateral with overhead
FY00
400
1,500
1,906
POLICE: COMMUNITY SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RECE I PTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Property Tax 178,564 205,938 194,623
Transfer: Empl Benefits 13,929 14,305 15,493
Total 192,493 220,243 210,116
199,379 207,110
15,818 16,925
215,197 224,035
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FYg8 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 169,267 177,112 190,439 182,593 186,725 196,374
Commodities 11,427 24,343 18,594 16,328 17,259 17,754
Services And Charges 11,599 17,988 11,318 9,695 9,713 9,907
Capital Outlay 200 800 1,500 1,500 1,500 0
Total 192,493 220,243 221,851 210,116 215,197 224,035
PERSONAL SERVICES:
POLICE OFFICER
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
2-00 2.00
2.00 2.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Printer, Laser - Color
2 Chair, Desk
FY00
4o0
1,100
1,500
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Total
EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
693,927 635,237 685,034
693,927 635,237 685,034
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
676,286 705,602
676,286 705,602
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES:
EMERGENCY COMM DISPATCHER
EMERGENCY C0~ SUPERVISOR
EMERGENCY COMM DISPATC}{ER
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
470,618 492,731 657,292 495,717
4,023 8,549 5,516 4,842
144,009 132,757 173,272 168,275
55,603 1,200 16,200 16,200
19,674 0 0 0
693,927 635,237 852,280 685,034
~-- FTE
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
9.00 9.00 1 Carpet
1.00 1.00 2 Chair, Dispatcher
1.25 1.25 3 Workstation
11.25 11.25
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
507,060 533,490
3,407 3,525
164,619 167,387
1,200 1,200
0 0
676,286 705,602
FY00
3,000
1,200
12,000
16,200
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Animal Control Services
Total
ANIMAL CONTROL
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
164,914 233,223 198,105
92,802 98,500 108,519
257,?16 331,723 306,624
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
219,015 218,491
108,416 108,318
327,431 326,809
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 190,615 224.789 247.712 231.513 236,979 249,348
Commodities 22,335 25.010 25,768 22,632 23.677 24,335
Services And Charges 33,471 55,058 49.853 45,579 44,275 45,126
Capital Outlay 11,295 26,866 6,900 6,900 22,500 8,000
Total 257,716 331.723 330,233 306,624 327,431 326,809
PERSONAL SERVICES:
KENNEL ASSISTANT
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER
ANIMAL CONTROL SUPERVISOR
KENNEL ASSISTANT
--- FTE
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00 2 Cages. Animal
3.00 3.00 1 Table, Animal Exam
1.00 1.00 1 Lockers
.44 .50 1 Printer, laser
5.44 5.50
FY00
3 500
1 000
400
2 000
6 900
-75-
FIRE DEPARTMENT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
RECEIPTS: ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 2,125,480 2,468,086 2,335,951
Charges For Services 526 0 0
University Fire ContraCt 798,260 803,862 851,626
Miscellaneous Revenue 12,208 23,983 18,396
Transfer: Empl Benefits 341,181 355,159 381,901
Total 3,277,655 3,651,090 3,587,874
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
2,633,713 3,049,208
0 0
868,659 886,032
18,778 20,078
389,921 417,215
3,911,071 4,372,533
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET -
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 2,888,494 2,940,328 3,418,488 3,002,583 3,399,930 3,785,167
Commodities 72,931 119,428 93,496 82,111 97,084 99,667
Services And Charges 220,209 360,423 403,832 348,949 312,851 323,693
Capital Outlay 70,042 201,281 229,175 123,175 70,150 132,950
Transfers Out 25,979 29,630 31,058 31,056 31,056 31,056
Total 3,277,655 3,651,090 4,176,047 3,587,874 3,911,071 4,372,533
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK/TYPIST
BATTALION CHIEF
FIRE CHIEF
FIREFIGHTER
FIRE LIEUTENANT
FIRE CAPTAIN
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
1.00 1.00
33,00 33.00
10,00 10.00
3,00 3.00
52.00 52.00
10 Table, Conference
25 Chairs, Stacking
1 Kitchen Table set
65 Lockers
i MSA Test Equipment, Fire
1 Rescue Raft w/Motor/Trailer
1 Monument Lifter
4 Mattresses, Fire Quarters
2 Chair, Side
10 Fire Hose Nozzles
1 Air Tank, Cascade - Fire
1 Dishwasher
7 SCBA Units
1 Camera, Digital
23 Fire Protection Helmets
1 Rescue Extrication Equip.
1 SVHS/VCR
2 Camcorder
4 Training Films/Videos
4 SCBA Tanks
3 Physical Fitness Equipment
-1 Repl carpet in living gtr FY99
2 Building Improvements
1 Carpet
2 Contracted Improvements
3 Fire educ. costumes / props
1 LDH Hose, 5
FY00
3,000
1,500
450
14,000
8,000
10.000
25,000
750
700
5,000
3,000
450
15,500
1,000
5,000
8,200
450
,900
1 000
1 700
4 200
-1 000
1 950
1 000
1 175
2 250
3000
123,175
TRANSFER T0:
Loan Repayment to Landfill
31,056
31,056
- 76 -
H I S ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
RECEIPTS:
'Property Tax
Mousing Permits & Inspect
Total
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
194,905 256,616 229,309
5,284 5,000 5,000
200,189 261,616 234,309
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
231,964 242,446
5,000 5,000
236,964 247,446
-- FY00 BUDGET -~
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 171,310 176,707 194,161 180,627 184,715 194,347
Commodities 1,057 1,448 1,937 1,703 1,766 1,815
Services And Charges 27,822 23,461 29,606 26,455 24,959 25,760
Capital Outlay 0 0 3,000 0 0 0
Transfers Out 0 60,000 25,524 25,524 25,524 25,524
Total 200,189 261,616 254,228 234,309 236,964 247,446
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CODE ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANT
HIS DIRECTOR
HOUSING ASSISTANT
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.13 1.13
3.13 3.13
FYO0
TRANSFER TO:
H.I.S. Computer Upgrade
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Bldg Permits & Inspect
Total
BUILDING INSPECTION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
0 0 0
455,642 424,740 421,500
455,642 424,740 421,500
25,524
25,524
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 6,002
423,075 424,666
423,075 430,668
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
318,060 352,844 371,318 345,744
7,088 5,362 8,144 7,151
44,426 45,075 53,952 51,682
0 0 1,500 1,500
369,574 403,281 434,914 406,077
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
353,902 372,427
7,508 7,723
49,066 50,518
0 0
410,476 430,668
PERSONAL SERVICES:
BUILDING INSPECTOR
DEVEDDPMENT REG SPECIALIST
SR BUILDING INSPECTOR
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
5.00 5.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
7.00 7.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2 Truck Topper
FY00
1,500
1,500
HOUSING INSPECTION SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Housing Permits & Inspect
Total
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
72.468 97,622 111,466
149,651 135,400 135,400
222,119 233,022 246,866
113,221 123,897
136,750 138,114
249,971 262,011
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
EXPENDITURES: ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 191.493 200,726 219.179 203,971 208,768 219,666
Commodities 1,379 1,667 2,159 1,895 1,913 1,963
Services And Charges 29,247 30,629 45,472 41,000 39,290 40,382
Total 222,119 233,022 266,810 246,866 249.971 262,011
PERSONAL SERVICES:
HOUSING INSPECTOR
BUILDING INSPECTOR
SR HOUSING INSPECTOR
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
FY00
- 78 -
GENERAL FUND
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
Parks & Recreation
Library
Senior Center
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Total
PARKS & RECREATION ADMIN
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
164,278 170,785 206,771
164,278 170,785 206,771
170,325 178,711
170,325 178,711
EXPENDITURES:
Personal ServIces
Commodi=ies
Services And Charges
Capital OuZlay
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
147,282 151,963 161,914 150,381
1,508 2,170 2,034 1,787
15,488 13,802 56,324 54,603
0 2,850 0 0
164,278 170,785 220,272 206,771
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
153,836 161,848
1,853 1,906
14,636 14,957
0 0
170,325 178,711
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
-~- FTE
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
FY00
PARKS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
RECEIPTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 759,753 1,203,110 1,081,515
Miscellaneous Revenue 17,188 16,200 16,200
Total 776,941 1,219,310 1,097,715
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,044,568 1,032,935
16,200 16,200
1,060,768 1,049,135
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CLERK TYPIST - PARKS/FORESTR
M.W. II - PARKS
M.W. III- PARKS
SR MW - TURFGRASS SPECIALIST
SR MW - PARKS
SUPERINTENDENT PARKS/FORESTR
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
499,227 590,721 817,884 693,096
35,409 91,707 72,337 63,528
183,729 209,138 246,729 226,371
49,336 143,744 114,720 114,720
9,240 184,000 0 0
776,941 1,219,310 1,251,670 1,097,715
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
5.00 6.00
3.00 3.00
2.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
12.00 13.00
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
709,513 746,280
58,118 59,555
224,678 228,676
68,459 14,624
0 0
1,060,768 1,049,135
10 Picnic Tables
10 Barbecue Grills
6 Trash Receptacles
2 Snow Thrower
1 Desk
2 Chair, Lobby
7 Chairs, for Conference Table
2 Chair, Desk
1 Backhoe Parking Pads
1 Micro Computer
1 Workstation
89 Trees
1 Ton P/U Truck
2 Light Tractors
1 LOg Loader Attchmt
1 Earth Auger
2 Radios, Portable
FYO0
2,000
1,500
1,800
1,500
700
300
1,050
1,370
1,500
11,500
1,500
24,000
3,500
53,000
6,200
1,000
2,300
114,720
- 79 -
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Recreation Fees
Hotel/Motel Tax
Total
RECREATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE Bb'DGET
1,201,883 1,274,306 1,558,560
620,010 642,513 740,998
69,934 114,197 115,667
1,891,827 2,031,016 2,415,225
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,506,445 1,496,522
711,440 718,261
116,245 117,407
2,334,130 2,332,190
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. I - RECREATION
CLERK TYPIST - PkRKS/FORESTR
SR CLERK/TYPIST - REC
M.W. II - RECREATION
M.W. II - POOLS
OFFICE COORD - RECREATION
REC PROGEAM SUPERVISOR
SR M.W. - RECREATION
RECREATION SUPT
M.W. I - RECREATION
M.W. I - POOLS
REC PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
FY96 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
1,260,688 1,313,552
110,872 133,304
357,762 392,765
162,505 191,395
0 0
1,891,827 2,031,016
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,604,039 1,555,105 1,589,449 1,671,497
135,474 118,977 125,031 128,649
454,143 414,250 407,579 415,902
248,730 248,730 133,908 37,979
78,163 78,163 78,163 78,163
2,520,549 2,415,225 2,334,130 2,332,190
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 2.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
.67 .67
1.00 1,00
1.00
1.00 1.50
.50 .50
13.17 14.67
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
3 Compressor, Air 975
1 Cash Register 600
4 Chair. Desk 2,795
3 Chair, Task 1,890
1 Desk 700
1 Workstation 1,000
1 Pool Deck Furniture 2,600
1 Stanchions / Backstroke Flags 2,680
1 Pool Bulkl~ead Grates 10,000
i Diving Board 2,000
1 Sound System 6,000
2 Volleyball Equipment 6,500
1 Table, Tennis 1,800
1 Bumper Pool Table 2,000
2 Weight Lifting Equipment 15,000
5 Micro Computer 26,000
1 Chairs, Snacking 2,000
12 Table, Conference 6,300
6 Building Improvements 113,500
1 Carpet 3,000
1 Windows that open 9,015
2 Counter, Office 6,500
1 HVAC Pneumatic Controls 5,000
1 Athletic Field Maintainer 8,000
i Lane Line, interior and exter. 2,100
3 Lawn Mower 1,050
3 Liquid Chlorination System 4,500
2 PoOl Control System 4,225
1 Special Olympic Sports Equip 400
1 Foosball Table 600
248,730
TRANSFER TO:
Scanlon Repaymt to Park Acq.
Mercer Gym Loan Repay
22,332
55,831
78,163
RECEIPTS:
Property Tax
Library Levy
Library Services
Johnson County Contract
Total
LIBI{ARY
FINANCIAL PLAlg FOR
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
2,129,384 2,150,028
431,300 445,984
184,745 184,293
258,186 256,789
3,003,615 3,037,094
FY00 - FY02
FY00
FINAL FY01 FY02
BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
2,230,312 2,201,808 2,347,062
466,049 477,932 484,577
182,514 188,781 182,300
255,579 260,750 266,002
3,134,454 3,129,271 3,279,941
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Total
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
2,018,906 2,130,833
66,777 70,612
384,618 363,114
381,524 435,745
151,790 36,790
3,003,615 3,037,094
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
2,418,547 2,279,476 2,331,583 2,452,759
80,641 70,823 66,411 70,405
341,399 334,515 324,125 330,607
422,850 412,850 370,362 389,380
36,790 36,790 36,790 36,790
3,300,227 3,134,454 3,129,271 3,279,941
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. I ~ GOVMT BLDGS
LIBRARY CLERK
PUBLIC SERVICES CLERK
SR LIBR~Y CLERK
LIBR~Y ASSIST/LNT I
LIBRARY ASSISTANT II
LIBRARY ASSISTANT III
M.W. III - LIBRARY
SR LIBRARY ASSISTANT
MICRO COMPUTER SPECIALIST
LIBRARY ASSIST~LNT II
LIBRARIAN II
SR LIBRARIAN
OFFICE MANAGER - LIBRARY
LIBRARY COORDINATOR
ASST LIBRARY DIRECTOR
LIBR~_RY DIRECTOR
M.W. I - GObleT BLDGS
LIBRARY CLERK
PUBLIC SERVICES CLERK
LIBRARY ASSISTA/Cr I
LIBRARY ASSISTANT II
LIBP. ARY ASSISTANT III
LIBPJ~RIAN I
LIBFtARIA/q II
--~ FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00
2.00 2.00
1.75 1.75
1.00 1,00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
5.00 5.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.25
1.25 1.25
1.25 1.25
.75 .75
.75 .75
2.75 2.75
.50
1.75 1.25
37.25 39.50
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
Building Improvements
Desensitizer
Digital Video Mixer
Workstation
Stage Platform
Micro Computer
Software
Network Cabling and Software
Books and Materials
TR3LNSFER TO:
Cable Channel Replacement
Computer Replacement Reserve
11,790
25,000
36,790
FYO0
3,500
6,000
4,000
20,000
2,100
t0,000
9,000
6,000
352,250
412,850
-81 -
LIBRARY SPECIAL REVENUES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RECEIPTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Property Tax 0 538 0
Library Services 98,586 46,650 47,150
Johnson County Contract 12,220 16,000 13,000
Restricted State Surchrg 57,441 60,000 60,000
Total 168,247 123,188 120,150
0 0
47,150 50,650
15,000 15,000
60,000 60,000
122,150 125,650
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
PERSONAL SERVICES:
PUBLIC SERVICES CLERK
SR LIBRARY ASSISTANT
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEFT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
27,934 43,666 47,579 45,353
5,699 9,885 8,310 7,298
37,502 39,637 29,220 25,789
70,088 30,000 5,000 5,000
141,223 123,188 90,109 83,440
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
.25 .25
.50 .50
.75 .75
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
46,374 48,788
5,925 6,081
25,789 26,306
0 0
78,088 81,175
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
I BOOks and Materials
FY00
5,000
5,000
SENIOR CENTER
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
RECEI~S:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Property Tax 428,476 524,859 504,417
Charges For Services 4,318 5,740 3,250
Johnson County Contract 108,277 114,357 126,917
Total 541,071 644,956 634,584
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
483,803 451,733
3,250 3,250
129,286 131,701
616,339 586,684
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers Out
Total
-- FY00 BEET --
FY98 FY99 DEFT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
268,225 275,430
17,039 18,926
124,663 182,945
63,277 99,809
67,867 67,846
541,071 644,956
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
393,959 309,173 316,259 332,766
23,071 21,473 18,274 18,786
183,171 162,940 146,575 149,901
55,767 55,767 50,000 0
85,231 85,231 85,231 85,231
741,199 634,584 616,339 586,684
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. II SENIOR CE}rrER
SR CLERK/TYPIST - SR CENTER
PROGRAM SPECIALIST - SR CENT
VOLUNTEER SP~CIALI~T-~R CNTR
SENIOR CENTER COORDINATOR
M.W. I - SENIOR CENTER
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.0O 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
.50 1.00
5.50 6.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
3 Table, worktable
1 Front Entry Remodel
1 Signage, ADA
1 DOOr / Frame Replacements
1 Audio Visual Presentation
5 Chair, Task
3 Workstation
FY00
738
21,655
2,600
8,000
828
3,150
18,796
55,767
TRANSFER TO:
Parking
To 38580 Sr Ctr Rep Ph II
To 38530 Sr Ctr ~VAC Improy
Sr. Ctr Ceiling Sprinkler #3
To L.F. FY95 Proj 38540
6,000
8,844
25,056
22,308
23,023
85,231
- 82 -
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Parl<ing
Public Transit
W astewater'Treatment
Water
Refuse Collection
Landfill
Airport
Broadband Telecommunications
Beginning Balance
Parking Fines
Interest Income
Building Rentals
Ramp Revenues
Other Parking Revenue
Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfer from Senior Center
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
PARKING OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY98
ACTUAL
1,952,254
473,732
379,928
14,400
1,849,557
863,569
155,369
6,000
0
3,742,555
1,141,560
22,952
513,187
14,086
2,147,377
3,839,162
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY99 DE PT FINAL FY01 FY02
ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,855,647 1,545,427 1,123,183 823,007
440,000 400,000 400,000 400,000
300,000 300,000 250,000 225,000
14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400
1,699,417 1,851,000 2,377,000 2,647,800
920,546 794,357 704,357 624,357
0 155,000 155,000 155,000
6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000
0 0 0 110,000
3,380,363 3,520,757 3,906,757 4,182,557
1,148,440 1,262,261 1,262,261 1,455,413 1,533,534
33,015 32,129 32,129 38,655 39,386
523,052 482,082 482,082 549,448 568,298
149,316 0 25,000 25,000 25,000
1,836,760 2,141,529 2,141,529 2,138,417 1,967,844
3,690,583 3,918,001 3,943,001 4,206,933 4,134,062
Ending Balance
1,855,647 1,545,427
1,123,183 823,007 871,502
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CASHIER - PARKING
M.W. I - PARKING SYSTEMS
PARKING ENFORCEMENT ATTEN~D~/q
M.W. II - PARKING SYSTEMS
M.W. II - RAMP/METER REPAIR
CUSTOMER SERV REP - PARKING
PARKING OPERATIONS SUPERVISO
PARKING MANAGER
PARKING AND TRANSIT DIRECTOR
CASMIER - PA/~KING
M.W. I - PARKING SYSTEMS
M.W. I - TOWING
PARKING ENFORCEMENT ATTEND~/q
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
3.00 3.00
2.00 2.00
4.00 4.00
2.00 2.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
.50 .50
10.00 10.00
1.OO 1.00
.50 .50
1.50 1.50
30.50 30.50
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Contracted Improvements 25,000
25,000
TRANSFER TO:
1992 Capital Loan Notes
1992 Revenue Refunding 86 GO
1995 Taxable Revenue Bonds
98 Parking Revenue Sinking
Improve/Replace Reserve
Transit Subsidy
Fines To General Fund
327,778
171,695
437,036
505,020
170,000
90,000
440,000
2,141,529
PARKING, BOND & INT SINKING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 162,666 136,670 36,670 0 0
Parking Impact Fee 77,980 0 0 0 0
TOtal Receipts 77,980 0 0 0 0
Services And Charges 59 0 0 0 0 0
Capltal Outlay 103,917 0 36,670 36,670 0 0
Transfers 0 100,000 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 103,976 100,000 36,670 36,670 0 0
Ending Balance
PERSONAL SERVICES:
136,670 36,670 0 0 0
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Land Acquisition 36,670
36,670
Beginning Balance
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PARKING, BOND RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
669,000 669,000
0 0
0 0
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 PY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
669,000 669,000 669,000
0 0 0 110,000
0 0 0 110,000
669,000 669,000
669,000 669,000 559,000
Beginning Balance
Transfer from Parking Fund
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PARKING RENEWAL & IMPROV RES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
1,693,270 1,810,202
180,0~4 990,000
180,014 990,000
0 100,000
63,082 2,017,322
63,082 2,117,322
1,810,202 682,880
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
682,880 822,880 692,880
170,000 170,000 170,000
170,000 170,000 170,000
30,000 30,000 0 0
0 0 300,000 0
30,000 30,000 300,000 0
822,880 692,880 862,880
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 SOftware 30,000
30,000
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
1992 PARKING BONDS-REFUND 86
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
149,213 150,833
166,665 174,645
166,665 174,645
165,045 163,155
165,045 163,155
150,833 162,323
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
162,323 163,348 164,240
171,695 168,480 0
171,695 168.480 0
170,670 170,670 167,588 164,240
170,670 170,670 167,588 164,240
163,348 164,240 0
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE -~-
FY99 FY00
· O0 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Principal 150,000
1 Rev Bond Interest Exp 20,670
170,670
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
1992 CAPITAL LOAN NOTES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
327,458 327,585
327,458 327,585
327,458 327,585
327,458 327,585
-~ FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0 0
327,778 332,218 330,938
327,778 332,218 330,938
327,778 327,778 332,218 330,938
327,778 327,778 332,218 330,938
0 0
0 0 0
PERSONAL SERVICES:
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital outlay
Total Expenditures
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTlAY:
1 Principal
1 Rev Bond Interest Exp
PARKING SINKING FUND 4/95
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FYO0 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
344,677 355,089 369,764
430,180 434,530 437,036
430,180 434,530 437,036
419,768 419,855 423,284 423,284
419,768 419,855 423,284 423,284
Ending Balance 355,089 369,764 383,516
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
· O0 . O0
CAPITAL OUTlAY:
1 Rev Bond Interest Exp
1 Principal
FY0t
PROJECTION
383,516
432 699
432 699
424 868
424 868
391 347
FY00
220,000
107,778
327,778
FY02
PROJECTION
391,347
431,886
431,886
419,793
419,793
403,440
FYO0
118,284
305.000
423,284
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
PARKING SINKING FUND -
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
0 200,000
0 200,000
0 0
0 0
1999
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
200,000 200,000 200,000
505,020 505,020 505,020
505,020 505,020 505,020
0 505,020 505,020 505,020
0 505,020 505,020 505,020
200,000 200,000 200,00O
Ending Balance
0 200,000
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Principal 505,020
505,020
Beginning Balance
Bus Fares
Para Trans Fare Rev.
Local Governments
Other State Grants
Fed. Intergov. Rev.
Interest Income
Auto Body Work Chargebacks
Miscellaneous Revenue
Transit Property Tax Levy
Transfer: General Levy
Transfer from Parking Fund
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
TRANSIT
FINANCIAL PLAN
OPERATIONS
FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
402,554 479.310
619,942 673,900
43,690 0
27,060 27,500
287,952 296,635
282,555 194,443
20,179 8,000
49,288 84,080
7,852 0
1,517.541 1.569,203
161,530 438,922
90,000 90,000
3,107,589 3,382,683
1,891,519 2,063,869
262,261 352,231
819,746 811,982
57,307 67,364
0 124,600
3,030,833 3,420,046
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FIN~LL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
441,947 382,571 361,039
609,000 609,000 609,000
0 0 0
28,000 28,500 29,000
296,635 296,635 296,635
300,000 300,000 300,000
15,000 15,000 15,000
50,000 50,000 50,000
0 0 0
1,639.804 1,681,613 1,704,995
400,000 460,000 530,000
90,000 90,000 90,000
3,428,439 3,530,748 3,624,630
2,302,454 2,235,820 2,287,641 2,406,098
366,939 366,939 370,975 375,084
870,456 869,056 887,264 911,538
0 0 0 0
16,000 16,000 6,400 0
3,555,849 3,487,815 3,552,280 3,692,720
Ending Balance
479,310 441,947
382,571 361,039 292,949
PERSONAL SERVICES=
ACCOUNT CLERK - TP. ANSIT
M.W. II - TRANSIT
MASS TRANSIT OPERATOR
PARTS/DATA ENTRY CLERK
DISPATCHER - TRANSIT
M.W. III - TRANSIT
MECMJ~NIC I
BODY REPAIR MECHANIC
MECHANIC II
MECHANIC III
SR MECHANIC
TRANSIT SHOP SUPERVISOR
TRANSIT OPERATIONS SUPV
TRANSIT MANAGER
PARKING AND TRANSIT DIRECTOR
M.W. I - TRANSIT FACILITY
M.W. I - TRANSIT
MASS TRANSIT OPERATOR
DISPATCHER - TRANSIT
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
19.00 19.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1,00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1.00
.50 .50
.50 .50
2.25 2.25
12.75 11.25
.75
48.00 48.25
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
TRANSFER TO:
Transit Local Share Grant
16,000
16,000
FY00
Revenue Source
Fare revenue
Bus Fares
Percentage Change
Bus Passes
Percentage Change
Bus Ticket Strips
Percentage Change
Miscellaneous Bus Fares
Percentage Change
Shop & Ride
Percentage Change
Sub-Total Bus Fares
Local Governmental Agencies
Percentage Change
State Grants
Percentage Change
Federal Grants
Percentage Change
Transfer: Transit Levy
Percentage Change
Transfer: General Levy
Percentage Change
Transfer from Parking Fund
Percentage Change
Miscellaneous
Percentage Change
Grand Total Revenues
Percentage Change
TRANSIT REVENUES
Actual Actual Budget
FY97 FY98 FY99
373,061 305,070 340,000
-4.9% -18.2% 11.4%
300,599 254,301 278,000
38.6% -15.4% 9.3%
55,014 50,971 48,000
259.5% -7.3% -5.8%
817 3,051 900
-65.5% 273.4% -70.5%
7,508 6,549 7,000
-38.1% -12.8% 6.9%
736,999 619,942 673,900
15.3% -15.9% 8.7%
27,060 27,060 27,500
0.0% 0.0% 1.6%
284,250 287,952 296,635
2.2% 1.3% 3.0%
217,217 282,555 194,443
-18.0% 30.1% -31.2%
1,478,950 1,517,541 1,569,203
5.5% 2.6% 3.4%
252,083 161,530 438,922
-6.3% -35.9% 171.7%
75,000 90,000 90,000
-16.7% 20.0% 0.0%
86,305 121,009 92,080
418.7% 40.2% -23.9%
3.157.864 3.107.589 3.382.683
5.7% -1.6% 8.9%
Budget
FY2000
307,000
-9.7%
252,000
-9.4%
43,000
-10.4%
1,000
11.1%
6,000
-14.3%
609,000
-9.6%
28,000
1.8%
296,635
0.0%
300,000
54.3%
1,639,804
4.5%
400,000
-8.9%
90,000
0.0%
65,000
-29.4%
3.428.439
1.4%
Projected
FY2001
307,000
0.0%
252,000
0.0%
43,000
0.0%
1,000
0.0%
6,000
0.0%
609,000
0.0%
28,500
1.8%
296,635
0.0%
300,000
0.0%
1,681,613
2.5%
460,000
15.0%
90,000
0.0%
65,000
0.0%
3.530.748
3.0%
Projected
FY2002
307,000
0.0%
252,000
0.0%
43,000
0.0%
1,000
0.0%
6,000
0.0%
609,000
0.0%
29,000
1.8%
296,635
0.0%
300,000
0.0%
1,704,995
1.4%
530,000
15.2%
90,000
0.0%
65,000
0.0%
3.624.630
2.7%
TRANSIT REPLACEMENT RES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 154,928 69,970 2,803 2,803 2,803
Fed. Intergov. Rev. 0 32,400 0 0 0
Federal Grants 166,551 0 64,000 25,600 0
Transfer From Transit Fund 0 44,600 16,000 6,400 0
Total Receipts 166,551 77,000 80,000 32,000 0
Capital Outlay 226,265 40,500 80,000 80,000 32,000 0
Transfers 25,244 103,667 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 251,509 144,167 80,000 80,000 32,000 0
Ending Balance
69,970 2,803 2,803 2,803 2,803
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 ROOf Repair/Replacement 80,000
80,000
WASTEWATER TREATMEN"r OPERATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 6.768,099 8,105,081 8,486,108 4,707,024 1,995,141
Charges For Services 9,978,014 10,983,000 11,445,000 11,959,600 12,570,000
Interest Income 730,288 655,000 706,700 762,000 661.000
Miscellaneous Revenue 67,866 19,000 60,000 60,000 60,000
Wastewater Lab Chargeback 38,818 50,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Total Receipts 10.814.986 11,707,000 12,251,700 12,821,600 13,331,000
Personal Services 1,229,687 1.250.979 1,353,923 1,353.923 1,385,461 1,607.350
Commodities 262,512 310,537 338,497 338,497 344,014 349,627
Services And Charges 1,201,996 1,353,180 1,498,517 1,431,691 1,461,553 1,655,486
Capital Outlay 153,867 293,573 385,100 385,100 264,500 258.400
Transfers 6,629,942 8,117.704 12,521,573 12.521,573 12.077,955 9,256,857
Total Expenditures 9,478,004 11,325.973 16.097,610 16,030,784 15,533,483 13.127.520
Endlng Balance 8,105.081 8,486,108 4,707,024
1,995, 14 1
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. - METER READER
M.W. I - WASTEWATER TRTMNT
SR CLERK/TYPIST - WASTEWATER
MW II - WASTEWATER TRTMNT PL
LABORATORY TECHNICIA/4
M.W. III- WASTEWATER COLLEC
MAINT OPERATOR - WASTEWATER
TPO - WASTEWATER TREATMENT
MW. III - WASTEWATER
ELECTRONICS TECH - WASTEWATE
SR TPO ' WASTEWATER
CHEMIST
SR M.W. - WASTEWATER COLLECT
SR M.W. - WASTEWATER PLANT
ASST SUPT - WASTEWATER TRMT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SUPT
- - FTE - - -
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY
.80 .80
1.00 1.00
.75 .75
4.00 4.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
4.00 4.00
5.00 5.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1-00
.75 .75
25.30 25.30
2,198,621
FY00
Chip / Seal 10,000
Inflow & Infiltration repair 50.000
Landscaping - WWTF 5,000
Laboratory Equipment 10,000
Safety Equip - Atmosph Testing 8,000
Building Repairs 50,000
Facility Equipment Repairs 50,000
Process Instruments 30,000
Lift Station Repairs 15,000
Sampling Equipment, Industrial 7,500
Bookshelves, Enclosed 650
Chair, Task 1,300
Micro Computer 12,000
Printer, Inkjet 650
Micro-Computer Software 10,000
Software, Utility Pkg. 125.000
385,100
Bond Type
Sewer Fund:
Sewer Revenue
Sewer Revenue
Sewer Revenue
Sewer Revenue
Total Sewer
Date of
Issue
TRANSFER TO:
New S. WWT Plant 3,166,000
Sewer Main Proj-Annual 300,000
1993 Refund 1986 Revenue 3,455,564
1996 Revenue Bond Issue 1,388.387
1999 Revenue Bond Issue 648.000
2000 Revenue Bond Issue 972,000
6/97 Revenue Bond Issue 772,213
1991 G.O. Bonds 24,703
1990 G.O. Bonds 97,128
1989 G.O. Bonds 200,656
1994 G.O. Bonds 287,415
1995 G.O. Bonds 237,507
98/99 Bond-lyr Debt Reserve 972.000
12,521,573
Amount
Issued
Principal
Outstanding
711199
Principal & Interest Payments
FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002
1-93 37,300,000 32,370,000 3,410,079 3,408,439 3,401,579
3-96 18,300,000 17,825,000 1,373,388 1,377,763 1,380,888
6-97 10,600,000 10,375,000 778,006 766,419 779,188
2-99 7,000,000 7,000,000 648,000 648,000 648,000
67,570,000 6,209,473 6,200,621 6,209,655
WASTEWATER REN & IMP RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BEGET
Beginning Balance 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Ending Balance 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
FY01
PROJECTION
2,000,000
2,000,000
FY02
PROJECTION
2,000,000
2,000,000
Beginning Balance
97 Sewer Transfers
Total Receipts
WASTEWATER BOND & INTEREST RES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION
4,932,363 5,706,001 6,354,001 7,326,001
773,638 648,000 972,000 1,194,000
773,638 648,000 972,000 1,194,000
Ending Balance 5.706,001 6,354,001 7,326,001
BOND & INTEREST SINKING 1/93
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
8,520,001
FY02
PROJECTION
8,520,001
0
0
8,520,001
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 2,432,592 2,467,282 2,494,797 2,540,282 2,583,157
Bond Ordinance Transfers 3,469,564 3,454,594 3,455,564 3,451,314 3,466,844
Total Receipts 3,469,564 3,454,594 3,455,564 3,451,314 3,466,844
Capital Outlay 3,434,874 3,427,079 3,410,079 3,410,079 3,408,439 3,399,578
Total Expenditures 3,434,874 3,427,079 3,410,079 3,410,079 3,408,439 3,399,578
Ending Balance 2,467,282 2,494,797 2,540,282 2,583,157 2,650,423
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Principal
1 Rev Bond Interest Exp
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--~ FTE
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
FY00
1,535~000
1,875,079
3,410,079
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PERSONAL SERVICES:
1996 SEWER REVENUE FUND
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
~Y98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
603,569 876,068
1,377,137 1,383,388
1.377,137 1,383,388
1,104,638 1,367,763
1,104,638 1,367,763
876,068 891,693
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.oo .oo - 91 -
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT PINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
891,693
1,388,387
1,388.387
1,373,388 1,373,368
1,373,388 1,373,388
906,692
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Rev Bond Innerest Exp
1 Principal
FY01
PROJECTION
906,692
1,392,138
1,392,138
1,377,763
1,377,763
921,067
FY02
PROJECTION
921,067
1,394,638
1,394,638
1,380,887
1,380,887
934,818
FYO0
973,388
400,000
1,373,388
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
BOND & INTEREST SINKING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
28,519 510,193
814,400 783,800
814,400 783,800
332,726 789,594
332,726 789.594
- 5/97
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
504,399 498,606 492,812
772,213 785,625 772. 750
772,213 785,625 772,750
778,006 778,006 791,419 779. 188
778,006 778,006 791,419 779,188
498. 606 492,812 486,374
Ending Balance
510 193 504,399
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1Rev Bond Interesn Exp 553,006
1 Principal 225,000
778,006
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PERSONAL SERVICES:
BOND & INTEREST SINKING - 1999
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
0 0 648,000
0 648,000 648,000
0 648,000 648,000
0 0 648,000 648,000
0 0 648,000 648,000
0 648,000 648,000
-- FTE
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Principal
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
648,000 648,000
648,000 648,000
648,000 648,000
648,000' 648,000
648,000 648,000
648,000 648,000
FY00
648,000
648,000
- 92 -
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PERSONAL SERVICES:
BOND & INTEREST SINKING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
- 2000
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0 0
972,000 972,000 972,000
972,000 972,000 972,000
972,000 972,000 972,000 972,000
972,000 972,000 972,000 972,000
0 0
0 0 0
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Principal 972,000
972,000
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
BOND & INTEREST SINKING - 2001
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0
1,194,000 1,194,000
1,194,000 1,194,000
1,194,000 1,194,000
1,194,000 1,194,000
0 0
- 93 -
Beginning Balance
Charges For Services
Water Sales
Hydrant Rental
Conn.& Recon. Fee
Interest Income
A/R Interest
Miscellaneous Revenue
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
WATER OPERATIONS
FINA/~CIAL PLAIq FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
5,120,998 7,874,534 9,066,562 11,015,160 6,886,654
240 0 0 0 0
7,122,356 8,015,000 9,098,000 9,717,000 9,717,000
1,205 0 0 0 0
95,351 0 0 0 0
520,480 398,000 548,000 813,700 556,000
20,952 0 0 0 0
61,666 50,000 120,000 120,000 120,000
7,822,250 8,463,000 9,766,000 10,650,700 10,393,000
1,316,393 1,284,091 1,459,436 1,408,276 1,441,128 1,665,860
667,040 882,916 831,896 781,896 793,622 805,565
1,098,784 1,299,800 1,418,732 1,413,662 1,416,968 1,605,643
305,646 404,686 448,030 448,030 140,000 140,000
1,680,851 3,399,479 3,765,538 3,765,538 t0,987,488 10,000,056
5,068,714 7,270,972 7,923,632 7,817,402 14,779,206 14,217,124
7,874,534 9,066,562
11,015,160 6,886,654 3,062,530
PERSONAL SERVICES:
M.W. - METER READER
WATER SERVICES CLERK
M.W. I-WATER CUSTOMER SERVIC
M.W. I - WATER DIST
M.W. II - WATER SERVICE
SR CLERK/TYPIST - STREETS
M.W. III- WATER DIST
TREATMENT PLANT OPER - WATER
PUBLIC INFO/ED COORD - WATER
CUSTOMER SERVICE COORD
ELECTRONICS TECH - WASTEWATE
SR TPO - WATER
SR M.W. - WATER DISTRIBUTION
ASST SUPT STREETS/TRAFFIC
ASST SUPT - WATER
SUPT-STREETS/SOLID WST/TPAFF
WATER SUPERINTENDENT
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.20 1.20
1.00 1.00
2.00 2-00
2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
.25
3.00 3.00
7.00 7.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
.25
1.00 1.00
.25
1.00 1.00
25.95 26.20
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Software, Utility Pkg. 125,000
1 Roof Repair/Replacemen~ 30,000
1 Contracted Improvements 50,000
1 Safe Drinking Water Act Imprv 75,000
1 Sandblasting 25,000
1 Landscaping 5,000
1 Piping, Chlorine 3,500
1 Surge Silurian Well Rehab 20,000
1 Shed, Storage 1,700
1 Water Meters 60,000
2 Radios, Portable 2,000
1 Mower 13,000
1 Projection Display System 5,730
1 Leak Detection Equipment 3,600
1 Raw Water Pump 18,000
1 Pump, Dewatering 8,000
1 Water Meter Field Programmer 1,900
1 Micro-Computer Software 600
448,030
TRANSFER TO:
Water Main Proj-Annual
2000 Revenue Bonds
1999 Revenue Bonds
1990 G.O. Bonds
1992 C~ Refunding 85/86
1994 G.O. Bonds
Nov 97 G.O. Water
1996 G.O. Bonds
1995 G.O. Bonds
Improvement Reserve
Water-One Yr Debt Res Trfr
170,000
320,000
800,000
37,775
112,599
183,552
534,156
387,789
575,667
136,000
508,000
3,765,538
Beginning Balance
Transfer from Water Fund
Total Receipts
Ending Balance
WATER DEPR,
FINANCIAL PLAN
EXT & IMPR RES
FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
1,474,536 1,610,536
136,000 136,000
136,000 136,000
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
1,746,536
136,000
136,000
1,610,536 1,746,536
1,882,536
FY01
PROJECTION
1,882,536
136,000
136,000
2,018,536
FY02
PROJECTION
2,018,536
636,000
636,000
2,654,536
Beginning Balance
Transfer from Water Fund
Total Receipts
Ending Balance
ONE YEAR DEBT SERVICE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
0 800,000
0 800,000
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET -~
DEPT FINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
800,000
508,000
508,000
0 800,000
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,308,000 3,488,000
2,180,000 0
2,180,000 0
1,308,000 3,488,000 3,488,000
Beglnnlng Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital OUtlay
Tonal Expenditures
Ending Balance
PERSONAL SERVICES:
BOND & INTEREST SINKING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
0 400,000
0 400,000
0 0
0 0
0 400,000
--- FTE --*
FY99 FY00
-00 .00
1999
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
400,000
800,000
800,000
800,000 800,000
800,000 800,000
400 000
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
400,000 400,000
800,000 800,000
800,000 800,000
800,000 800,000
800,000 800,000
400,000 400,000
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Principal 800,000
800,000
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Endin9 Balance
Beginning Balance
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
BOND & INTEREST SINKING
FINANCIAL PLAN
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
FOR FY00
- 2000
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BEGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 320,000 320,000
320,000 508,000 508,000
320,000 508,000 508,CC0
0 0 508,000 508,000
0 0 508,000 508,000
320,000 320,000 320,000
__
BOND & INTEREST SINKING -
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
2001
FY02
-~ FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL
REQUEST BUDGET
0 0
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0 1,420,000
0 1,420,000 2,180,00C
0 1,420.000 2,180,00C
0 0 2,180,000
0 0 2,180,000
0 1,420,000 1,420,000
REFUSE COLLECTION OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
Beginning Balance 468,836 656,519
Refuse Collection Fees 1,375,675 1,365,000
Recycling Curbside Collection 434,867 435,000
Refuse Stickers - $1 per bag 24,846 36,000
Yardwaste Bags 95,965 90,000
Yardwaste Stickers 4,320 0
Interest Income 28,382 20,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 81 0
Total Receipts 1,964,136 1,946,000
Personal Services 765,117 835,637
Commodities 16,046 38,003
Services And Charges 979,012 1,061,431
Capital Outlay 0 0
Transfers 16,278 0
Total Expenditures 1,776,453 1,935,071
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
667,448 580,738 517,091
1,295,000 1,305,000 1,315,000
435,000 437,000 439,000
25,000 25,000 25,000
90,000 90,000 90,000
0 0 0
20,000 20,000 20,000
0 0 0
1,865,000 1,877,000 1,889,000
960,282 960,282 982,990 1,034,016
33,304 33,304 33,938 34,582
908,124 908,124 923,719 939,511
50,000 50,000 0 0
0 0 0 0
1,951,710 1,951,710 1,940,647 2,008,109
Ending Balance
656,519 667,448
580,738 517,091 397,982
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CLERK/TYPIST ~ SOLID WASTE
M.W. I - REFUSE
M.W. II - REFUSE
A~ST SUPT STREETS/TRAFFIC EN
ASST SUPT SOLID WASTE
STREETS/SOLID WST/TRAFFIC SU
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.75 1.00
7.00 7.00
11.00 11.00
.75
1.00
.35
19.50 20.35
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Software, Utility Pkg.
FY00
_.
50,000
50,000
LA/~DFILL OPERATIONS
FIN/LNCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
Begirn~ing Balance
Landfill Fees
Recycled Solid Waste
Recycling Curbside Collection
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services ~nd Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
1,566,912 2,417,671
3,795,268 3,145,000
240,970 200,000
4,278 0
268,208 175,000
1,973 0
4,107 0
4.314.804 3,520,000
476,514 555.853
51,799 54,389
1,180,895 1,287,655
54,837 127.029
1,700,000 300,000
3,464,045 2,324,926
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BEGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
3,612,745 3,934,000 4,250,778
2,400,000 2,400,000 2,400,000
200,000 200,000 200,000
0 0 0
125,000 150,000 160,000
0 0 0
0 0 0
2,725,000 2,750,000 2,760,000
631,839 614,212 628,632 661,204
60,422 60,422 61,558 62,716
1,206,611 1,206,611 1,222,032 1,238,458
222,500 222,500 221,000 81,000
300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
2,421,372 2,403,745 2,433,222 2,343,378
Ending Balance
2,417,671 3,612,745
3,934,000 4,250,778 4,667,400
PERSONS/. SERVICES:
SCALEMOUSE OPERATOR
M.W. I - LANDFILL
M.W. II - LANDFILL
SR CLERK/TYPIST - WASTEWATER
MW II - LJ~NDFILL/RECYCLE
M.W. III - I~NDFILL
SR M.W. - LANDFIILL
CIVIL ENGINEER
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SUPT
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
2.00 2.00
1.00
3.00 3.00
.25 .25
1.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
.25 .25
11.50 11.50
CAPITAL otTrIAy: FY00
Contracted Improvements 75,000
Chip / Seal 4,000
Groundwater Monitoring Instru. 2,000
Roll Off Bins - Recycling 10,000
Vacuum, Litter 18,000
Tarper, Automatic 60,000
Compost Screener 50,000
Computer Workstation 3,500
222,500
TRANSFER TO:
Transfer-Capital Reserve
300,000
300,000
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Total Receipts
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
Beginnin9 Balance
Interest Income
Interfund Loan Repayments
Transfer from Landfill Fund
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
LANDFILL CLOSE-PERPETUAL CARE
FINA/~CIAL PLA/q FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FYg8 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
305,649 0 0 0 0
15,991 0 0 0 0
15,991 0 0 O 0
321,640 0 0 0 0 0
321,640 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
LANDFILL REPLACEMENT RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FYg8 FY99 DEPT FIN~J~ FY01 FY02
AC~AL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
4,926,763 5,399,746 2,420,651 3,250,326 3,996,001
266,047 250,000 220,000 136,000 163,000
134,031 142,823 309,675 309,675 309,675
1,700,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000
2,100,078 692,823 829,675 745,675 772,675
0 400,000 0 0 0 0
1,627,095 3,271,918 0 0 0 368,000
1,627,095 3,671,918 0 0 0 368,000
5,399,746 2,420,651 3,250,326 3,996,001 4,400,676
Beginning Balance
State Surcharge
Interest Income
Total Receipts
CommOdities
Services And Charges
Transfers
Total EXpenditures
Ending Balance
SOLID WASTE SURCHARGE RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FYg8 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
221,861 182,015
72,974 75,000
10,311 12,000
83,285 87,000
0 2,454
66,454 75,552
56,677 37,700
123,131 115,706
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FYOl FY02
REQUEST BUIX]ET PROJECTION PROJECTION
153,309 142,800 133,858
93,750 93,750 93,750
7,600 8,300 8,900
101,350 102,050 102,650
0 0 0 0
64,259 64,259 64,992 65,744
47,600 47,600 46,000 49,500
111,859 111,859 110,992 115,244
182,015 153,309
142,800 133,858 121,264
TRANSFER TO:
JCCOG, Solid Waste Dept.
47,600
47,600
Beginning Balance
Landfill Fees
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Ending Balance
LANDFILL ASSUR.
FINANCIAL PLAN
FY98
ACTUAL
2,315,820
629,732
135,461
321,640
1,086,833
3,402.653
560,000
120,000
0
680,000
CLOSURE RESRV.
FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY0O BUDGET --
FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
4,082,653 4,821,653 5.597,653
535,000 535,000 535,000
204,000 241,000 280,000
0 0 0
739,000 776,000 815,000
3,402,653 4,082,653 4,821,653 5,597,653 6,412,653
Begiruning Balance
Landfill Fees
Interest Income
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Endin9 Balance
LANDFILL SPEC. CLEANIIP RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BLrDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEFT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
338,277 502,942 558, ~02 594,678 631,220
187,022 139,500 112,500 112,500 112,500
20,594 15,000 5,400 6,200 6,900
207,616 154,500 117,900 118,700 119,400
1,310 2,835 829 829 846 890
1,486 1,092 1,672 1,672 1,703 1,735
38,725 69,713 54,523 54,523 54,609 54,696
1,430 0 0 0 0 0
0 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
42,951 98,640 82,024 82,024 82,158 82,321
502,942 558,802 594,678 631,220 668,299
TR3~NSFER TO:
"JCCOG, Solid Waste Grant
25,000
25,000
Beginning Balance
Rentals
Miscellaneous Revenue
Transfer: General Levy
TOtal Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services ~uld Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
34,125 47,633
150,042 160,343
6,404 6,150
67,885 65.000
224.331 231,493
75.211 81,988
6,473 5,272
82,206 114,352
481 21,900
46,452 51,347
210,823 274.859
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET ~-
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
4,267 4,931 8.414
236,488 236,488 236,488
6,000 6,000 6,000
64,000 80,700 86,200
306,488 323,188 328,688
103,124 93,917 105,729 111,609
6,594 6,594 6,721 6,851
87,280 87,280 89,222 91,210
0 0 0 0
118.033 118,033 118,033 118,033
315,031 305,824 319,705 327,703
47,633 4,267
4,931 8,414 9,399
PERSONAL SERVICES=
AIRPORT MANAGER
MAINTENANCE WORKER I-AIRPORT
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
.50 .75
1.50 1.75
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
TRANSFER TO:
S.T-Hanger Loan Repay #37430
South East T-Hanger #37310
Corp. Hanger #37330
26,185
27,360
64.488
118,033
- 100- '
Beginning Balance
Fines & Fees Code En
Charges For Services
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
Cable TV Franchise
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
BROADBAND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
172,808 243,218
23,500 21,750
3,036 0
21,188 12,000
4,855 739
363,069 323,000
415,648 357,489
211,145 229,829
6,113 5,536
63,471 56,693
12,731 16,241
51,778 53,240
345,238 361,539
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
239,168 214,934 182,125
0 0 0
0 0 0
18,000 18,000 18,000
0 0 0
365,000 365,000 365,000
383,000 383,000 383,000
271,387 271,387 277,611 292,016
10,130 10,130 10,321 10,515
49,584 48,754 49,321 50,268
22,210 22,210 22,000 0
54,753 54,753 56,556 58,000
408,064 407,234 415,809 410,799
243,218 239,168
214,934 182,125 154,326
PERSONAL SERVICES:
PRODUCTION ASSIST~aqT
INTERACTIVE SPECIALIST
PRODUCTION COORDINATOR - BTC
CLERICAL ASSISTANT - CABLE T
CABLE TVADMINISTRATOR
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
.50
.75 .75
3.75 4.25
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Micro Computer, Laptop 2,100
1 Micro Computer 4,000
2 Television 610
1 Video Edlt System ~ BBT 11,000
4 Chairs, for Conference Table 1,500
1 Workstation 2,500
1 Table, Conference 500
22,210
TRANSFER TO:
Library Ch 10 Support
Equip. Replacement Reserve
44,753
10,000
54,753
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Cable TV Franchise
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PERSONAL SERVICES:
COMMUNITY PROGRAMMER
LOCAL ACCESS PASS THROUGH
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIM3~TE
85,308 161,525
6,146 0
122,067 98,000
128,213 98,000
34,041 36,265
0 750
15,705 17,707
1,783 1,000
467 6,990
51,996 62,712
~- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
196,813 263,521 331,764
5,000 5,000 5,000
125,000 125,000 125,000
130,000 130,000 130,000
39,763 39,763 40,659 42,789
1,000 1,000 1,020 1,040
20,029 20,029 20,078 20,127
2,500 2,500 0 0
0 0 0 0
63,292 63,292 61,757 63,956
161,525 196,813
263,521 331,764 397.808
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Workstation
FY00
2,500
2,500
- 101 -
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Cable TV Franchise
Total Receipts
Services And Charges
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Transfer [rom Broadband FUnd
Total Receipts
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PUBLIC ACCESS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT F I NAL FY 01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 583 583 0 0
583 0 0 0 0
161,366 162,629 163,000 163,000 163,000
161,949 162,629 163,000 163,000 163,000
161,366 162,629 163,583 163,583 163,000 163,000
161,366 162,629 163,583 163,583 163,000 163,000
583 583 0 0 0
BBT EQUIPMENT REPLACE. RES.
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FYgB FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
45,791 55,975
2,514 2,500
10,000 10,000
12,514 12,500
648 0
0 1,402
1,682 8,000
2,330 9,402
-- FY00 BUDGET -~
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
59,073 70,935 82,785
2,500 2,500 2,500
10,000 10,000 10,000
12,500 12,500 12,500
638 638 650 662
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
638 638 650 662
55,975 59,073
70,935 82,785 94,623
Beginning Balance
Ending Balance
CABLE REFRANCHISING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
200,000 200,000
200,000 200,000
200,000 200,000 200,000
200,000 200,000 200~000
- 102 - '
OTHER FUNDS
Debt Service Fund
Employee Benefits
Road Use Tax
JCCOG
Community Development Block
and Other Grants
Computer Information Sewices
Equipment
Central Services
Library Reserves
Parkland Reserves
Assisted Housing
Energy Consewation
Risk Management Loss Reserve
Health Insurance Reserve
Special Assessments
RISE Repayment Fund
Beginning Balance
Debt Service Levy
M & E Credits
Interest Income
Accr Int On Bonds
Bond Ordinance Transfers
Abatements Funding
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
DEBT SERVICE FUND
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
649,163 618,434
2.602,537 3,119,507
10,045 17,556
86,927 5,000
5,349 0
1,391,995 1,346,549
1,072,535 1.438,389
7,212 375,000
5,176,600 6,302,001
5,196,266 6,279,415
11,063 375,000
5,207,329 6,654,415
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
266,020 30,311 0
4,352,606 5,287.189 6,125,014
31,952 97,478 0
10. 000 0 0
0 0 0
1,284,141 1,237,193 1,190.244
1,394,806 1,157,173 !,024,237
240,097 95,788 0
7,313,602 7,874,821 8,339,495
6,517,719 7,309,214 7,809,344 8,333,495
240,097 240,097 95,788 0
6,757.816 7,549,311 7,905,132 8,333,495
618,434 266,020
30,311 0 6,000
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Prog. Alloc. Contra
12 Principal
12 G.O. Bond Interest Exp
1 Comm Protection Alloc.
1 Muman Dev. Alloc.
1 Home & Comm. Alloc.
1 Policy & Admin Alloc.
-7,309,21
4,805,000
2,504,214
291,760
1,229,423
5,777,259
10,771
7,309,214
TRANSFER TO:
Residual Equity Transfer
240,097
240,097
.... 103-
Debt Service Fund
Summary of Expenditures
FY2000 Through FY2002
General Obligation
Multi-purpose and sewer*
construction
Multi-purpose and
sewer*/water construction
Multi-purpose and sewer*
construction
Multi-purpose and water
construction special
assessment* refunded the
callable portion of the 1985
and 1986 GO bond issues
Capital Loan Note- Parking
Multi-purpose and
sewer*/water construction
Multi-purpose and
sewer*/water construction
Water construction
Capital Loan Note
Multi-purpose
Water construction
Multi-purpose
Multi-purpose
Multi-purpose
Multi-purpose
Total Debt
Less: amount paid from
abatements and fund balance
Total Direct Tax Levy
Obligation
Date Principal
of Amount Outstanding
Issue Issued 7-1-99
12-89 $2,960,000 $300,000
Principal and Interest Due
FY2000 FY2001 FY2002
$318,300 $0 $0
12-90 2,300,000 450,000 252,675 238,950
0
9-91 2,340,000 675,000 262,800 250,200 237,600
6-92 4,870,000 1,365,000 503,555 495,980 516,950
* Debtse~ice paid from eachfund
**Pr~e~edissues
10-92 3,450,000 2,135,000 327,778 332,218 330,938
6-94 7,370,000 3,625,000 895,375 861,300 827,225
4-95 8,500,000 5,660,000 994,586 959,086 923,586
531,575 520,825 509,825
71,500 68,250 0
718,082 693,800 669,520
534,156 520,750 507,244
935,113 909,957 884,800
940,500 859,750 838,375
0 1,291,495 998,750
0 0 1,291,495
$7,285,995 $8,002,561 8,536,308
3,284,386 2,854,372 2,545,419
$4,001,609 $5,148,189
3-96 6,100,000 5,500,000
6-96 295,000 130,000
4-97 5,200,000 4,150,000
11-97 5,540,000 5,250,000
4-98 8,500,000 7,925,000
3-99 9,000,000 9,000,000
3-00** 11,300,000 0
3-01'* 6,700,000 0
$46,165,000
$5,990,889
- 104 - '
Beginning Balance
Empl. Benefits Levy
University Fire Contract
Interest Income
General Fund Transfer
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Services And Charges
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
FINANCIAL
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
1,237,659 1,338,370
2,975,601 3,030,228
77,813 86,961
43,957 14,000
200,000 0
513,195 590,174
3,810,566 3,721,363
36,329 52,367
140,745 157,983
3,532,781 3,647,924
3,709,855 3,858,274
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINILL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,201,459 465,255 395,688
3,468,264 3,611,000 3,916,420
0 0 0
10,000 10,000 10,000
0 0 0
609,441 642,047 585,000
4,087,705 4,263,047 4,511,420
49,070 49,070 50,119 52,053
139,230 139,230 141,225 143,944
4,635,609 4,635,609 4,141,270 4,385,279
4,823,909 4,823,909 4,332,614 4,581,276
1,338.370 1,201,459
465,255 395,688 325,832
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ASST FINANCE DIRECTOR
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.15 .15
.23 .30
.38 .45
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
TRANSFER TO:
Jo. Co. Task Force Grant 7,823
Police Records Transfer 9,653
Police Patrol Transfers 407,817
Police Criminal Invest Trans 65,596
Police Administration Trans. 21,701
Community Services Bureau 15,493
Stop Violence/Wmn Grant 7,162
Fire Administration Transfer 23,620
Hazardous Materials Oper. 18,196
General Fund Benefits 3,046,805
Fire Training Transfer 8,495
Fire Suppression Transfer 349,786
Federal Crime Bill Grant 44,220
27th Payperiod Resrv 609,242
4,635,609
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Total Receipts
Services And Charges
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PUBLIC SAFETY RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
3,898,435 3,514,035 3,088,826 2,593,631 2,083,436
116,510 150,000 90,000 75,000 50,000
116,510 150,000 90,000 75,000 50,000
160 209 195 195 195 199
500,750 575,000 585,000 585,000 585,000 585,000
500,910 575,209 585,195 585,195 585,195 585,199
3,514,035 3,088,826 2,593,631 2,083,436 1,548,237
TPj~NSFER TO:
To Fire Employee Benefit
To Police Employee Benefit
220,000
365,000
585,000
--- - 105 -
CITY OF IOWA CITY
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
Costs Budgeted in Employee Benefits Fund
FY97 FY98 FY99 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002
ACTUAL ACTUAL RE-EST BUDGET PROJECTED PROJECTED
..... $ .......... $ .......... $ .......... $ .......... $ .......... $ .....
Police e~ Fire Pension and Retirement
General Fund Employee Benefits
Workers Compensation
Unemployment Insurance
Loss Reserve Transfer
Miscellaneous Transfers ez Expenses
Staff Support
Police e~ Fire Retirement-Chapter 410
Transfer to General Fund-27 pay period
TOTAL TRUST e~ AGENCY FUND BENEFITS
Costs Budgeted in General Fund
FICA
IPERS
Health, Life ez Disability Insurance
TOTAL GENERAL FUND BENEFITS
Paid from General Tax Levy
PAID FROM EMPLOYEE BENEFITS TAX LEVY
724,194 766,781 846,207 971,126 991,518 1,060,923
2,731,830 2,766,000 2,801,717 3,046,805 3,141,137 3,315,138
33,845 39,078 65,000 45,000 45,855 46,726
13,904 12,428 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,930
102,705 52,500 60,000 60,000 61,140 62,302
18,083 36,739 11,483 12,730 12,730 12,986
20,051 21,368 22,367 29,070 29,739
20,869 14,961 30,000 20,000 20,380
609,242 0
3,665,481 3,709,855 3,858,274 4,815,473 4,323,999
700,212 734,619 819,751 920,050 937,775
447,815 498,360 506,491 582, 113 592,694
1,693,510 1,729,289 '1,770,931 1,892,343 1,978,224
2,841,537 2,962,268 3,097, 173 3,394,506 3,508,693
109,707 196,268 295,456 347,701 367,556
2,731,830 2,766,000 2,801,717 3,046,805 3,141,137
31,285
20,768
0
4,572,058
1,003,424
634, 179
2,071,320
3,708,923
393,785
3,315, i 38
Employer's Contribution Rate
Police / Fire Retirement - City pays per State Code
Police / Fire Retirement - State actuafial rate
17.00% 17.00% 17.00% 17.00% 17.00%
16.99% ! 5.94% 13.62%
17.00%
FICA 7.65% 7.65% 7.65% 7.65% 7.65% 7.65%
IPER5 5.75% 5.75% 5.75% 5.75% 5.75% 5.75%
Police ~ Fire Retirement - The State of Iowa adminsters the Police ez Fire Retirement Fund. The State Code requires a minimum contribution
from cities of 17%. The 6/30/97 annual actuary of the MFPRI (pension fund) calculated a city contribution rate of 13.62%, which would
result in savings to Iowa City taxpayers of approximately $168,246 in the employee benefits property tax levy in FY99.
FICA - Rate is expected to remain at 7.65%. Maximum salary covered on the social security portion is $68,400 for Calendar Year 1998 and
is $72,600 in Calendar Year 1999.
IPERS - The rate remains at 5.75%~ the maximum salary cap was eliminated-effective January 1, i 997.
- 106 -
Beginning Balance
Road Use Tax
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Services And Charges
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
FINANCIAL
ROAD USE TAX
PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
682,188 3,604,107 1,195,906
239,899 4,200,000 4,400,000
175,433 200,000 200,000
45,366 23,501 23,501
460,698 4,423,501 4,623,501
1,987 1,425 2,416 2,416
536,792 6,830,277 5,317,809 5,317,809
538,779 6,831,702 5,320,225 5,320,225
3,604,107 1,195,906 499,182
FY01
PROJECTION
499,182
4,488,000
200,000
23,501
4,711.501
2,416
3,987,634
3,990,050
1,220,633
FY02
PROJECTION
1,220,633
4,577,760
200,000
23,501
4,801,261
2,464
4,450,947
4,453,411
1,568,483
TRANSFER TO:
Traffic Engineering
Streets Maintenance
Airport N. Commercial
Inter City Trails
Entrance to City - Beautify
FY99 Pavement Marking
Foster Road
Hwy 6 Sidewalk/Drainage
Longfellow/Pine St. Trail
Mormon Trek Abbey Storm
Mormon Trek-Plaen View/Hwy 1
Overwidth Paving
Railroad Crossing Improvemnt
Creek Drainage/Maint
Asphalt resurf/Chip Seal
Sump Pump Discharge Tiles
Traffic Calming
Dubuque St. Elev.
Traffic Signals
Curb Ramps - A.D.A.
Forestry-Parkway Mtce.
PIN Prog. RUT Projects
Transfer-JCCOG Trans
886,513
2,060,616
200,000
30,000
30,000
50.000
400,000
100.000
50,000
75,000
100 000
40 000
20 000
15 000
606 000
25 000
25 000
60 000
120 000
250 000
41 800
7 500
125 380
5,317,809
· - - 107-
ROAD USE TAX FUND
TRANSFERS OUT AND EXPENDITURE DETAIL
FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000
ACTUAL ACTUAL REoEST BUDGET
FY2001
PROJECTED
FY 2002
PROJECTED
Miscellaneous Expenditures
Transfer - Gf Streets
Transfer o Gf Traffic Engineering
Transfer - Gf Forestry
Transfer-GF Pin Grant
Transfer * JCCOG - Trans Planning
Sub Total - Operating Transfers & Miscellaneous
Expenditures
Airport Property Development
Asphalt & Chip Seal-Annual
Benton-Orchard To Oaknoll
Brick Street Reconstruction
Brookside Bddge
Burlington St. Bridge-South
Burlington St. Dam Safety
Burlington/Gilbert Intersection
Burlington/Governor Signals
Burlington/Madison To Gilbert
Capitol/Benton Signal
Captain Irish Parkway-ACT/Dodge
Concrete Street Maint.
Court St Extended.
Creek/Drainage Maint.
Curb Ramps- A. D. A.
Dodge Street Paving
Dubuque Street Elevation
East West Arterial Act To Dodg
East West Arterial- Scott to ACT
Entrances to City-Beautification Project
Extra Width Sidewalk
First Ave/lais Rr Crossing Imprv
First Ave-Muscatine/Bradford
First Ave-Ralston Creek/Muscatine
First Avenue Extended
Foster Rd/Dubuque Intersection
(ROW/Grading)
Foster Road-West of Dubuque to Elks
Gilbert - Hwy. 6 dual left turn lanes
Gilbert St Corridor Study
Gilbert St IAIS Underpass Pedestrian Imp
Gilbert St. Railroad Crossing
GilbertJ Lakeside Signals
Hwy 1/Hwy6/Riverside Dr Dual Left Turn Lanes
Hwy 1/Sunset - Right Turn
Hwy 6 Median, Sidewalk and Drainage Imp
Hwy 6/1 St Ave - Left Turn
Hwy 965 Extension
Hy-Vee Storm Sewer
1,201 1,988 1,425 2,416 2,416 2.464
1,797,688 1,799,820 2,002,506 2,060,616 2,019,961 2,103,731
858,447 821,995 833,538 886,513 889, 173 915,716
33,940 35,513 38,000 41,800 43,000 47,000
- 15,000 7,500 7,500 7,500
81.272 84,005 117,700 125,380 128,000 139,000
2,772,548 2.743,321 3,008.169 3,124,225 3,090,050 3,215,411
200,000
515,865 335,108 395,000 606,000
13,177 11,823
35.945 57,496 16,154
3,382
1,039 2,961
382,767 22
53,473 6,527
202 6,875
28,545 31,455
153,000 250,000
22,327 37,673
15,000
85,928 30,242 301,104 250,000
1,225 25,000
106
1,413 7
34,756 714
12,596 120,520
203,102 21,737
72 656
4,966
(22,168)
7,946
20
3,672
111,390
13,980
540
375
2,497
60,000
50,000
60.000
100,000
15,000
100,000 30,000 30,000
29,993 40,000 40,000
24,344
400,000
100,000
13,610
56,000
76,020
42,000
24,460
100,000
24,625
50,000
100.000
220,000
15,000
100,000
200,000
30,000
40,000
100,000
75,000
5O,00O
- 108 -
ROAD USE TAX FUND
TRANSFERS OUT AND EXPENDITURE DETAIL
FY 98 FY 99 FY 2000
ACTUAL RE-EST BUDGET
FY 97
ACTUAL
38.058
16,119
763
28
73,511
585,519
402.225
151
25,758
la River Tr.-Water Plant / Taft
Industrial Pk Rd Ditch Mtce
Intra City Bike Trails
Iowa Ave Tattletales
Iowa Avenue Streetscape
Iowa River Bank Stabilization
Imu / Iowa Ave
Kirkwood & Gilbert Upgrade
Longfellow/Pine St Peal/Bicycle Trail
Madison Street Paving
Melrose Ave. - West High To 218
Melrose Ave. Bridge
Melrose Avenue
Mormon Trek-Abbey Lane/Hwy 1
Mormon Trek/Abbey Lane Storm Sewer
Mormon Trek-Benton/Melrose
Mormon Trek/Rohret Road
NE Property Development
Overwidth Paving Projects
Park Rd Bridge Approach
Pavement Marking
Public Works Complex
RR Crossings-City Wide
Railroad Tunneling
River Street Paving
Rohret Road Improvements
Rohret Road Pedestrian Bridge
Scott Blvd. / lais Rr Improv
Scott Boulevard Sidewalk
Second Avenue Bddge
Soccer Site Access Road
South Gilbert Storm Sewer
South Area Arterial
Southgate Avenue Extension
Summit St. Bridge Replacement
Sump Pump Discharge Tiles
Traffic Calming
Traffic Signals
Washington St. Plantings
Washington/Iowa Signal
Waterfront Drive Improv.
Waterfront Drive Rr Crossing
Willow St.-Muscatine/Brookside
WooIf Ave. Bridge Reconstruction
Sub Total - Transfer to CIP
S~b Total - Total Transfers from RUT
Grand Total Road Use Tax Fund
26,116 442,941
FY2001
PROJECTED
31,327
142
46,590
13,765
30,000 30,000 30,000
26,673
50,000
13,273
137,528
15,053
208,220
37
8.500
1,235
92,472
54,741
100.000
75,000
17,938
2,397
4,539
(10,701)
(13,425)
10,037
17,190
6,171
62,665
16,560
50,000
50,000
200,000
136,500 50,000 50.000
88.072
69,113 20.000 20,000
451.143
5,526
50,586
7,194
6,364
1,112
5.407
5,261
7.626
2,957,876
5.729,223
5.730,424
12,898
56,454
6.217
585
20,360
1,020
11,921
44,154
57,928
1,795.458
4,536,791
4.538,779
200.000
60,000
27,102
25,000
25,000
120,000
2,196,000
5,317,809
5,320,225
80,000
496,829
139,466
25.000
54.640
130,000
3,823,533
6,830.277
6,831,702
25,000
130,000
900,000
3,987,634
3,990,050
FY 2002
PROJECTED
200,000
28,000
50,000
20,000
50,00O
25,000
35,000
1,238,000
4,450,947
4,453,411
-- - 109 -
JCCOG SUMMARY
FINA/~CIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
Beginning Balance
Charges For Services
Local Governments
Other State Grants
Transfer from Road Use Tax
Get Fund-non Op Adm.
Transfer from Landfill Fund
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
2,058 2 1,018
2,879 500 500
90,749 90,702 76,631
78,912 83,500 91,455
84,005 117,700 125,380
85,658 96,425 129,500
56,677 62.700 72,600
398,880 451,527 496.066
312.965 340,279 376,762 376,762
2.424 5,511 3,622 3,622
85.395 98.421 112,215 111,615
152 6,300 4.900 4,900
400.936 450,511 497,499 496.899
Ending Balance 2 1,018 185
FY01
PROJECTION
185
500
77,283
91,455
128,000
133,575
71,000
501.813
385.371
3,565
109,961
2,000
500,897
1,101
FY02
PROJECTION
1,101
500
77,943
91,455
139.000
142.200
74.500
525,598
405,468
3,664
112,136
2,000
523,268
3,431
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN
ASSOCIATE Ph~a~INER
HUMAN SERVICES COORDINATOR
SOLID WASTE PLAiCNER
}a3MINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
ASST PCD DIRECTOR/JCCOG EX D
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.10 .40
2.50 2.50
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
.20 .20
1.00 1.00
5.80 6.10
--
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Telephones. Cellular
2 On-Street Traffic Counters
1 Workstation
RECE I PTS:
JCCOG ADMINISTRATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BIrDGET
Charges For Services -5 0 0
Local Governmntl Agencies 25,407 24,501 9,600
State Grants 0 22,000 23,500
Non Oper Admin Transfer 43.422 39,387 72,300
Total 68.824 85,888 105,400
EXPENDITURES:
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0
9,600 9.600
23.500 23.5D0
75.275 79,900
108,375 113,000
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 39,354 51,575 69,222 69,222 70,754 74,450
Commodities 287 1,540 1.284 1.284 1,151 1.183
Services And Charges 29,242 31,848 35.762 35,762 36,244 36,995
Total 68,883 84,963 106,268 106.268 108,149 112,628
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
ASST PCD DIRECTOR/JCCOG EX D
.10 .40
.20 .20
.50 .50
.80 1.10
FY00
400
2.000
2,500
4,900
FYO0
-110-
JCCOG TRANSPORTATION PLAN
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RECEIPTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Charges For Services 43 0 0
Local Governmntl Agencies 25,539 26,770 27,172
State Grants 78,912 61,500 67,955
Road Use Tax 84,005 117,700 125,380
Total 188,499 205,970 220,507
0 0
27.580 27,994
67,955 67,955
128,000 139,000
223,535 234,949
EXPENDITURES:
-* FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
Personal Services 168,629 175,739 189,482 189,482 193,873 203,981
Commodities 1,511 2,919 1,561 1,561 1,624 1,670
Services And Charges 18,357 20,966 27,445 27,045 25,851 26.615
Capital Outlay 152 6,300 2,400 2,400 2,000 2,000
Total 188,649 205,924 220,888 220,488 223,348 234,266
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
2.50 2.50
.50 .50
3.00 3.00
PERSONAL SERVICES:
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
ASST PCD DIRECTOR/JCCOG EX D
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Telephones, Cellular
2 On-Street Traffic Counters
FY00
400
2,000
2,400
JCCOGKUMAN SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
RE CE I PTS:
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
Charges For Services 2,841 500 500
Local Governmntl Agencies 15,468 15,072 15.500
Non Oper Admin Transfer 42,236 57,038 57.200
Total 60,545 72,610 73,200
FY02
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
500 500
15,500 15,500
58.300 62,300
74,300 78,300
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Total
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET
50,903 58,018 58,388 58,388
277 511 356 356
10,481 14,081 14,599 14,399
61,661 72,610 73,343 73,143
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
59,668 62.781
365 375
14,188 14,529
74,221 77,685
PERSONAL SERVICES:
MUMAN SERVICES COORDINATOR
--- FTE
FY99 FY00 C~PITAL OLP~Lj~Y:
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
FY00
0
JCCOG, SOLID WASTE MGMT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
RECEIPTS:
LOcal Governmntl Agencies
Transfer from Landfill
Total
FY00
FY98 FY99 FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE BUDGET
24,335 24,359 24,359
56,677 62,700 72,600
81,012 87,059 96,959
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
24,603 24,849
71,000 74,500
95,603 99,349
EXPENDITURES:
Personal Services
Commodities
Services ~ad Charges
Capital Outlay
Total
-- FY00 BL~GET -~
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BEET
54,079 54,947 59,670 59,670
349 541 421 421
27,315 31,526 34,409 34,409
0 0 2,500 2,500
81,743 87,014 97,000 97,000
FY01 FY02
PROJECTION PROJECTION
61,076 64,256
425 436
33,678 33,997
0 0
95,179 98,689
PERSONAL SERVICES:
SOLID WASTE PLANNER
--- FTE
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL 0UTL~Y: FY00
1.00 1.00 1 Workstation 2,500
1.00 1.00 2,500
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DE~T FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Begiru%ing Balance -223,909 -22,762 0 0 0
Other State Grants 0 90,000 0 0 0
Federal Grants 1,114,792 1,446,280 500,000 500,000 500,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 8,194 0 0 0 0
I~3an Proceeds 5,394 -5,394 0 0 0
Total Receipts 1,128,380 1,530,886 500,000 500,000 500,000
Personal Services 48,634 107,171 72,291 72,291 74,007 77,859
Commodities 5 0 505 505 540 556
Services ~uld Charges 165,893 338,342 111,368 111,368 111,537 111,782
Capital Outlay 712,701 1,062,611 315,836 315,836 313,916 309,145
Total Farpenditures 927,233 1,508,124 500,000 500,000 500,000 499,342
Ending Balance
-22,762 0 0 0 658
PERSONAL SERVICES:
HOUSING REHAB ASSISTANT
REHAB OFFICER
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COORD
PROGRAM ASSISTANT
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.30 .30
.30 .30
.40 .40
.10 .10
.20 .20
1.30 1.30
CAPITAL OIFT~Y: FY00
8 Land Acquisition 235,836
5 Building Improvements 80,000
315,836
-112- --
CDBG, METRO ENTITLEMENT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BEGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance -108,849 -10,358 0 0 0
Comm Dev Block Grant 777,726 1,288,825 830,000 830,000 830.000
Building Rentals 3,948 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Revenue 5.195 40,000 70,000 70,000 70,000
Loan Repayments 117,572 0 0 0 0
Loan Proceeds 4,145 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Transfer 275 0 0 0 0
Total Receipts 908,861 1,328,825 900,000 900,000 900,000
Personal Services 187,403 221,630 196,464 196,464 201,120 211.593
Commodities 7.007 5,127 1,948 1.948 2,016 2,073
Services And Charges 438,447 239,829 224,715 224.715 224,407 231,055
Capital Outlay 177,513 761,300 476,873 476.873 472,457 454.693
Contingency 0 90,581 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 810,370 1,318,467 900,000 900,000 900,000 899,414
Ending Balance
~10.358 0 0 0 586
PERSONAL SERVICES:
MOUSING RE~L~BASSISTANT
REHAB OFFICER
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
COMM'JNITY DEVELOPMENT COORID
PROGRAM ASSISTANT
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.70 .70
.70 .70
.80 .80
.25 .25
.70 .70
.30 .30
3.45 3.45
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Land Acquisition
31 Building Improvements
1 CDBG Equipmt, Applicnt
1 File, Lateral -
278,740
122,533
75,000
600
476,873
Beginning Balance
Charges For Services
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
CDBG FLOOD GRANT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98
ACTUAL
-228
412,176
412,176
1,554
21
410,373
411,948
0
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
FY99
ESTIMATE
0 0 0
..... 113-
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
I.S.-Mini Cmptr Chg
I.S.-Micro Cmptr Chg
I.S.-Dev. Serv. Fees
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
COMPUTER
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION SERVICES
PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 2,725 6,894 22,730 67,174
400 0 0 0 0
391 0 0 0 0
375,265 370,797 338,641 417,205 490,215
263,904 423,559 488,748 363,646 393,723
0 23,857 0 0 0
639,960 818,213 827.389 780,851 883,938
335,264 344,718 521,617 469,874 534,964 560,503
18,111 25,020 27,598 27,598 23,097 29,361
195,543 180,103 202,181 202,181 162,746 165,558
88,317 264,203 111,900 111,900 15,600 21,700
637,235 814,044 863,296 811,553 736,407 777,122
2,725 6,894 22,730 67,174 173,990
PERSONAL SERVICES:
OPERATIONS SPECIALIST
PROGR~aMMER/ANALYST
SR. PROGRAMMER/ANALYST
WEB MASTER
INFORMATION SERVICES COORD
ASST FINANCE DIRECTOR
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK/TYPIST
PROGRAMMER/ANALYST
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1.00 1.00 1 Building Improvements 10,000
1.00 2.00 4 Chair, Desk 2,400
2.00 2.00 3 Desk 3,000
1.00 2 Network Server 30,000
1.00 1.00 1 JUKEBOX 18,000
.45 2 Micro Computer 6,000
.50 8 Micro Computer - public use 36,000
.50 1 Printer, Laser - Color 6,500
5.50 7.95 111,900
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
I.S.-Cmptr Repl Chgb
Total Receipts
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
COMPUTER REPLACEMENT FUND
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
265,290 394,119
17,324 12,000
5,003 0
269,776 190,750
292,103 202,750
5,409 3,088
2,981 19,754
154,884 296,989
163,274 319,831
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
277,038 386,862 473,060
18,000 18,360 18,727
0 0 0
202,006 202,006 202,006
220,006 220,366 220,733
546 546 532 547
22,636 22,636 22,636 23,089
87,000 87,000 111,000 127,000
110,182 110,182 134,168 150,636
394,119 277,038
386,862 473,060 543,157
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00
.00 .00
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
5 Memory 15,000
15 RAM Upgrades 15,000
5 Printer, laser 17,000
2 Routers for Wide Area Network 25,000
1 Network Rack Cabinet & Hub 15,000
87,000
-114- --
POLICE COMPUTER REPLACEMENT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 130.063 220,957 212,259 51,414 15,639
I.S.-Cmptr Repl Chgb 150.120 137,220 88,155 64,225 64.225
Miscellaneous Transfer 6,439 0 O 0 0
Total Receipts 156,559 137,220 88,155 64,225 64.225
Commodities 0 183 0 0 0 0
Services And Charges 0 75 85,000 85,000 0 0
Capital Outlay 16,878 23,114 0 0 100,000 0
Transfers 48,787 122,546 164,000 164,000 0 0
Total Expenditures 65,665 145,918 249,000 249,000 100,000 0
Ending Balance
220.957 212,259 51,414 15,639 79,864
TRANSFER TO:
COPS MORE GRANT
164,000
164.000
Beginning Balance
I.S.-Cmptr Repl Chgb
Total Receipts
Services And Charges
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
FIN/HUMAN RESOURCES SFTWR RES.
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 0
0 35,000
0 35,000
0 0
0 0
0 35,000
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
35,000 5,000 40,000
35,000 35,000 35,000
35,000 35,000 35,000
65,000 65,000 0 0
65.000 65.000 0 0
5,000 40.000 75,000
.... 115-
Beginning Balance
Charges For Services
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
~- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
18,599 1,045 11,516 1,738 3,180
1,193,486 1,250,000 1,295,137 1,288,296 1,329,268
2,324 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
1 1259 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
62,673 0 0 0 0
1,259,742 1,253,000 1,298,137 1,291,296 1,332,268
442,555 444,925 479,956 479,956 491,106 516! 523
588,498 605,242 625,898 610,641 609,789 624,087
245,268 192,362 187,318 187,318 188,959 194 , 148
975 0 30,000 30,000 0 0
1,277,296 1,242,529 1,323,172 1,307,915 1,289,854 1,334,758
Ending Balance
1,045 11,516 1,738 3,180 690
PERSONAL SERVICES:
PARTS/DATA ENTRY CLERK
MECHANIC I
MECi4ANIC II
MECHANIC Ill
EQUIPMENT SHOP SUPERVISOR
EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT
--- FTE ~--
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
3.00 3.00
1.00 1.00
2.00 2.00
1.00 1,00
,70 .70
8.70 8.70
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Contracted Improvements 30,00C
30,000
-116- '
Beginning Balance
Charges For Services
Interest Income
M~scellaneous Revenue
Sale Of Autos
Interfund Loans
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PERSONAL SERVICES:
EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT
BUYER I - EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98
ACTUAL
2,649,376
861,901
143,497
1,470
2,225
20,058
1,029,151
36,962
30
12,327
592,292
62,673
704,284
FY99
ESTIMATE
2 974,243
1 024,000
100,000
0
0
3,939
1 127,939
38,331
0
4,947
1,563,108
0
1 606,386
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
2,495,796 1,193,125 601,141
914,505 923,647 932,880
145,000 148,000 150,000
2,000 2,000 2,000
3,000 3,000 3,000
3,780 3,780 3,780
1,068,285 1,080,427 1,091,660
42,466 42,466 43,398 45,657
30 30 18 19
6,457 6,457 6,190 6,343
2,322,003 2,322,003 1,622,805 1,328,402
0 0 0 0
2,370,956 2,370,956 1,672,411 1,380,421
2,974,243 2 495,796
1,193,125 601,141 312,380
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
.30 .30
.50 .50
-80 .80
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
End loader 90,000
Aerifier
Chipper Class 28,000
Tree Spade Class 22,200
Tower Truck Class 56,900
Chipper Class 28,000
Bucket Truck 93,700
Compact P/U Truck 86,000
Landfill Scraper 380,000
Forklift 18,900
Chipper/Shredder 2
Compact P/U Pool 17,000
Gang Mower Class 56,900
Street Sweeper 110,800
Refuse Truck Class 164,800
1/2 Ton P/U Truck 18,000
3/4 Ton P/U Class 47,400
3/4 Ton Utility Class 23,700
1 Ton Flatbed Class 63,000
Cargo Van Class 19,400
Passenger Van Class 46,400
2 Ton Dump Truck(s) 582,400
2 Ton Flatbed Class 72,800
Motor Grader 103,500
Large BacKhoe 147,800
Compact Auto(s) 27,000
Midsize Auto Class 17,400
2,322,003
Beginning Balance
University Fire Contract
Interest Income
Sale Of Autos
Transfer: General Levy
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
FIRE EQUIP REPLACEMENT RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
238,353 265,984
0 22,186
4,991 0
200 0
22,440 0
27,631 22,186
0 24,000
0 260,000
0 284,000
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
4,170 31,970 60,470
22,800 23,500 24,000
5,000 5,000 5,000
0 0 0
0 0 0
27,800 28,500 29,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
265,984 4,170
31.970 60.470 89,470
117-
Beginning Balance
Charges For Services
Refuse Collection Fees
Junk Car Removal
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
Photographic Supp.
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
CENTRAL SERVICES
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
213,709 294,292
712,084 760,749
233 0
11,330 11,300
13,291 8,900
827 121,850
675 500
4.000 0
742,440 903,299
68,639 73.521
63,949 83,161
485,226 544,436
40,043 162,157
4,000 0
661,857 863,275
- FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
334,316 369,015 483,580
900,292 923,806 947,770
0 0 0
11,443 11,557 11,673
11,800 12,600 13,300
500 500 500
670 671 672
0 0 0
924,705 949,134 973. 915
107,976 98,874 101,261 106,508
81. 850 81,850 73. 437 75,067
629. 782 629,782 629,871 643. 188
79,500 79,500 30,000 178,000
0 0 0 0
899,108 890,006 834,569 1,002,763
294.292 334,316
369,015 483.580 454,732
PERSONAL SERVICES:
CENTRAL SERVICES CLERK
BUYER II
PURCHASING AGENT
MAIL CLERK
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.00 1.00
.10 .50
.10 .10
-50 .50
1.70 2.10
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
Telephone System
1 Mail System
4 Photocopier
1 Copier, Color
FY00
2.500
8,000
34,000
35,000
79,500
-118-
LIBRARY EQUIP REPL RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
~- FY00 BUDGET ~-
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 0 20,111 31,901 43,691 55,481
Interest Income 319 0 0 0 0
Library Dept Transfer 11,790 11,790 11,790 11,790 11,790
Miscellaneous Transfer 21,330 0 0 0 0
Total Receipts 33,439 11,790 11,790 11,790 11,790
Capital Outlay 13,328 0 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 13,328 0 0 0 0 0
Ending Balance
Beginning Balance
inneresu Income
MiScellaneous Revenue
Library Dept Transfer
MAscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
20.111 31,901 43,691 55,481 67,271
LIBRARY COMPUTER REPL RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 227,877
2,529 0
405 0
140,000 25,000
94.249 0
237,183 25,000
9,306 0
0 150,000
9,306 150,000
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
102,877 127,877 152,877
0 0 0
0 0 0
25,000 25,000 25,000
0 0 0
25,000 25,000 25,000
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
227,877 102,877
127,877 152,877 177,877
-119 -
Beginning Balance
Hotel/Motel Tax
Interest Income
MIscellaneous Transfer
Interfund Loans
Total Receipts
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PARK LAND AQUISITION RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 516,029 266,029 238,361 160,693
32,636 0 0 0 0
6,208 0 0 0 0
442,962 0 0 0 0
0 0 22,332 22,332 22,332
481,806 0 22,332 22,332 22,332
-34,223 250,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 50,000
-34,223 250,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 50,000
516,029 266,029 238,361 160,693 133,025
TRANSFER TO:
Land Acquisition
50,000
50,000
PARK LAND DEVELOPMENT RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
BeginnIng Balance 0 64,821 9,526 9,526 9,526
Hotel/Motel Tax 13,987 0 0 0 0
Interest Income 676 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Revenue 39 0 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Transfer 50,553 0 0 0 0
Total Receipts 65,255 O 0 0 0
Transfers 434 55,295 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 434 55,295 0 0 0 0
Ending Balance
64,821 9,526 9,526 9,526 9,526
-120 -
ASSISTED HOUSING
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
Beginning Balance
Federal Grants
Housing Admin. Grant
Interest Income
Rent Of Property
Miscellaneous Revenue
Sale of Land
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
254.274 360,760
3,616,697 3,523,009
410,398 424,176
10,248 8,211
272,964 232,859
1,396 0
2,600 0
-1,317,321 0
2,996,982 4,188,255
510,858 533,438
16,968 18,002
3,681,953 3,636,860
56,168 565
-1,375,711 0
2,890,236 4,188,865
-- FY00 BUDGET ~-
DEPT FINAL FY01 FYO2
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
360,150 360,252 354,889
3,620,000 3,620,000 3,620,000
426,000 426,000 426,000
7,000 7,000 7,000
250,000 250,000 250,000
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
4,303,000 4,303,000 4,303,000
521,479 521,479 533.369 561,191
36,520 36,520 37,292 38,213
3,739,049 3,736,349 3,737,702 3,743,823
8,550 8,550 0 0
0 0 0 0
4,305,598 4,302,89~ 4,308,363 4,343,227
Ending Balance
360,760 360,150
360,252 354,889 314,662
PERSONAL SERVICES:
LEASED MSNG RECEPTIONIST
CLERK/TYPIST - LEASED MSNG
M.W. II - PUBLIC MOUSING
INTAKE WORKER
HOUSING MANAGEMENT AIDE
OFFICE COORD - ASSISTED HSNG
HOUSING PROGRAM ASSISTANT
HOUSING OFFICE MANAGER
HOUSING SPECIALIST
SECTION 8 COORDINATOR
PUBLIC HOUSING COORDINATOR
HOUSING ADMINISTRATOR
HOUSING INSPECTOR
--- FTE
FY99 FY00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
5.00
1.00
2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1,00 1.00
.?5 .75
11.75 10.75
CAPITAL OUTLAY: FY00
1 Bookshelves, Enclosed 1,500
1 Chair, Task 750
4 Chairs, for Conference Table 800
1 Desk Return EXtension 3,000
1 Table, Conference 1,500
1 HutCh 1,000
8,550
Beginning Balance
Federal Grants
Total Receipts
Commodities
Services And Charges
capital outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
1926 BROADWAY APTS REPAIR
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 -316
266,347 43,765
266,347 43,765
335 0
9,148 0
257,180 43,449
266,663 43,449
-- FY00 BUDGET '-
DEFT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0 0
0 0 0
O 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
-316 0
0 0 0
.... 121 -
PUBLIC HOUSING REPL RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
~- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 240.275 310,421 381,821 450,221 518.621
Interest Income 13,753 15,000 12,000 12,000 12,000
Miscellaneous Revenue 56,400 56,400 56,400 56,400 56,400
Total Receipts 70,153 71,400 68,400 68.400 68,400
Services And Charges 7 0 0 0 0 0
Total Expenditures 7 0 0 O 0 0
Ending Balance
310,421 381,821 450,221 518,621 587,021
Beginning Balance
Federal Grants
Miscellaneous Revenue
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Ending Balance
Beginning Balance
interest Income
Mxscellaneous Revenue
Sale of Land
Total Receipts
Services And Charges
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PUBLIC HSG-NEW CONSTR./009
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 25,244
391 0
-372 0
25,225 0
25,244 0
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DBPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
25,244 25,244 25,244
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
25,244 25,244
25,244 25,244 25,244
PHO TENANT TO OWNER PROGRAM
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
0 157,809
618 0
625 0
158,644 0
159.887 0
2,078 0
2,078 0
-- FY00'BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
157,809 157,809 157,809
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
157,809 157,809
157,809 157,809 157,809
Beginning Balance
Federal Grants
Interest Income
Total Receipts
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
PUBLIC HSG. ACQUISITION 1-06
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
896 -1
46,553 541
-31 0
46,522 541
6,126 540
14,341 0
26,952 0
47,419 540
-- FY00 BUDGET '-
DEFT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
-1
0 0 0 0
- 122 - ~
EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance -697 -24,430 -1 0 0
Other State Grants 91,064 187,999 160,001 160,000 160,000
Total Receipts 91,064 187,999 160,001 160,000 160,000
Personal Services 2,922 3,445 0 0 0 0
Services And Charges 111,875 160,125 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000
Total Expenditures 114,797 163,570 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000
Ending Balance -24,430 ~1 0 0 0
Beginning Balance
Loan Repayments
Total Rece~pus
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
ENERGY CONSERVATION
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
80,647 103,410 113,590 63,584 69,482
22,763 10,180 9,994 5,898 4,635
22,763 10,180 9,994 5,898 4,635
0 0 60,000 60,000 0 0
0 0 60,000 60,000 0 0
103,410 113,590 63,584 69,482 74,117
TRANSFER TO:
Rec. Ctr FY00 Boilers Repl.
Civic Center FY00 Window Rep
33,000
27,000
60.000
123 -
Beginning Balance
Tort Levy
M & E Credits
Risk Management Fees
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
Miscellaneous Transfer
Interfund Loans
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Commodities
Services And Charges
Capital Outlay
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
RISK MANAGEMENT LOSS RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
1,840,080 2,275,497
0 183,000
0 1,784
615,659 514,702
94,397 56,358
327,134 2,500
-25 0
0 182,000
4,007 0
1,041,172 940,344
85,072 85,538
3,899 4,262
475,119 1,052,890
1,665 2,980
40,000 182,000
605,755 1,327,670
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
1,888,171 1,677,125 1,462,639
381,367 396,731 425.000
2,832 6,578 0
621,165 623,945 626,753
66,000 66,000 66,000
2,500 2,500 2,500
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1,073,864 1,095,754 1,120,253
93,552 93,552 95,724 100,709
5,019 5,019 5,302 5,456
1,186,339 1,186,339 1,209,214 1,251,736
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1,284,910 1,284,910 1,310,240 1,357,901
2,275,497 1,888,171
1,677,125 1,462,639 1,224,991
PERSONAL SERVICES:
OCC. HEALTH & SAFETY SPECIAL
ASST FINANCE DIRECTOR
ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY
--- FTE ---
FY99 FY00 CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1.00 1.00
.30 .30
.29 .26
1.59 1-56
FY00
Beginning Balance
Realth Insurance Chargebacks
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Transfer
Total Receipts
Personal Services
Services And Charges
Transfers
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
HEALTH INSURANCE RESERVE
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
2,915,390 3,312,345
2,641,923 2,617,000
159,852 152,500
163 0
2,801,938 2,769,500
85 0
2,204,898 2,818,309
200,000 200,000
2,404,983 3,018,309
-- FY00 BUDGET ~-
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
3,063,536 2,793,909 2,470,587
2,635,000 2,635,000 2,635,000
152,500 152,500 152,500
0 0 0
2,787,500 2,787,500 2,787,500
0 0 0 0
2,857,127 2,857,127 2,910,822 2,966,567
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
3,057,127 3,057,127 3,110,822 3,166,567
3,312,345 3,063,536
2,793,909 2,470,587 2,09t,520
TRANSFER TO:
Health Ins. Transfer
200,000
200,000
- 124 - --
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 - FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
FY98 FY99 DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
ACTUAL ESTIMATE REQUEST BUDGET PROJECTION PROJECTION
Beginning Balance 161,879 842 1,842 1,845 487
Interest Income 3,419 0 0 0 0
Special Assessments 41,518 24,501 23,504 22,143 23,014
Total Receipts 44,937 24,501 23,504 22,143 23,014
Transfers 205.974 23,501 23,501 23,501 23,501 23~501
Total Expenditures 205,974 23,501 23.501 230501 23,501 23,501
Ending Balance
842 1,842 1,845 487 0
TRANSFER TO:
Spec Asses 71190 to RUT
23,501
23,501
Beginning Balance
Interest Income
Miscellaneous Revenue
Total Receipts
Capital Outlay
Total Expenditures
Ending Balance
RISE REPAYMENT FUND
FINANCIAL PLAN FOR FY00 -
FY98 FY99
ACTUAL ESTIMATE
7,152 10,967
206 0
17,000 13,391
17,206 13.391
13,391 13,391
13,391 13,391
FY02
-- FY00 BUDGET --
DEPT FINAL FY01 FY02
REQUEST BEET PROJECTION PROJECTION
10,967 10,967 0
0 0 0
13,391 2,424 0
13,391 2,424 0
13,391 13,391 13,391 0
13,391 13,391 13,391 0
10,967 10,967
10,967 0 0
PERSONAL SERVICES:
--- FTE --~
FY99 FY00
.00
CAPITAL OUTLAY:
1 Loan Repayment
FY00
13,391
13,391
- 125-
- 126 -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Summary of Projects
Projects by Fiscal Year
Unfu.nded Projects
CITY OF IOWA CITY
Capital Improvements Program
FY1999 - 2003
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
June, 1999
- 127 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Summary by Category - All Categories
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total
Bridges 2, 273, 076 600, 000 1, 370, 000 4,243, 076
Street Reconstruction 8,062, 136 6,551,000 2,425,000 10,290,000 6,890.000 34,218. 136
Ped &Bike Trails 1,700,732 676,000 30,000 180,000 30,000 2,616,732
Wastewater 10.848,307 13,300,000 16,960,000 700,000 300,000 42.108.307
Water 13,415,387 4,890,000 31,330,000 4, 170,000 170,000 53,975,387
Stormwater 1,660, 634 2. 436, 000 1,940, 000 540, 000 140, 000 6. 716, 634
Parks &Recreation 2,462,850 1,170,000 1,255,000 305,000 805.000 5.997,850
Airport 5, 215, 500 3, 528, 961 345, 000 368, 000 9, 457, 461
Landfill 1, 186, 210 3, 300, 000 4,486. 210
Other Projects 48,589, 145 2,874,000 1,780,000 1,130,000 3,810,000 58, 183, 145
Bond Control Accts 62,866,095 62,866,095
GP~ND TOTA~,~ ' 158,280,072 35,425,961 56,065,000 18,283,000 16~81~,000 284,869,033
- 128 -
Bridges
Bridges
5-Year Projection
2000 2001 2002 2GG3
Street Reconstruction
The Street Reconstruction category accounts for the construction and rebuilding of existing City streets, the purchase of land for future street right-
of-way, and the construction of New Streets within the City.
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
BENTON-ORCHARD/QAKNOLL 4,323
BIENNIAL ASPHALT/CHIP SEAL 395,000 806,000 50,000 820,000 50,000
BIENNIAL BRICK S'I2 RECONSTRUCTION 160,000 165,000
BIENNIAL P.C.C. MAINTENANCE 200,000 220,000
BURLINGTON/GOVERNOR SIGNALS 6,527
BURLINGTON/MADISON TO GILBERT 10,000
CAPTAIN IRISH PKWY-ACT/DODGE 2,163,711
CAPTAIN IRISH PKWY-SCO'FF/ROCH. 5,000,000
COURT ST EXTENDED PHASE I 635,617
CURB RAMPS - A.D.A. 301,104 250,000 250,000
DODGE STREET PAVING
DUBUQUE ST ELEVATION 360,000
EXTRA WIDTH SIDEWALK 29,993
FIRST AVENUE EXTENDED 24,344 1,500,000
FOSTER RD-DBQ/PRAIRIE DU CHIEN 750,000
FOSTER RD-W OF DUB THRU ELKS 145,800
FOSTER RD/DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
FY99 PAVEMENT MARKING 136,500 50,000 50,000
GILBERT ST CORRIDOR STUDY 76,020
GILBERT ST IAIS UNDERPASS 250,000
HWY 1/SUNSET - RIGHT TURN 99,460
HWY 6/1 ST AVE - LEFT TURN 99,625
IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE 266,458 1,700,000
L MUSCATINE-DEFOREST/SPRUCE 700,000
MELROSE AVENUE 21,741
MORMON TREK-ABBEY LANE/HWY 1
MORMON TREK-BENTON/MELROSE 12,000
MORMON TREK-R/R OVERPASS
MORMON TREK/ROHRET ROAD 18,060
OVRWDTH PAV/EXTRA WDTH SIDWLK 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
PARK RD/RIVERSIDE-LEFT TURN 230,000
RIVER ST PAVING 2,548,109
RR CROSSINGS-CITY WIDE 69,113 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
SCOTT BLVD SIDEWALK 60,000
SOUTH AREA ARTERIAL 80,000
SOUTHGATE AVE. EXTENSION 713,991
SYCAMORE-BURNS TO CITY LIMITS
TRAFFIC CALMING 30,640 25,000 25,000 25,000
TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS 94,000 120,000 130,000 135,000
1,600,000
2,380,000
1,050,000
50,000 50,000
1,500,000
2,500,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
25,000
140,000
Total
4,323
2,121,000
325,000
420.000
6,527
10,000
2,163,711
5,000,000
635,617
801,104
1,600,000
360,000
29,993
1,524,344
750,000
2,525,800
1,050,000
336,500
76,020
250,000
99,460
99,625
3,466,458
700,000
21,741
2,500,000
12,000
1,400,000
18,060
180,000
230,000
2,548.109
149,113
60,000
80,000
713,991
1,200,000
130,640
619,000
- 130-
Street Reconstruction
Street Reconstruction
5-Year Projection
12000 '
looou./~
· ~. , .~_.,~
~ooo./' ?.~',.:-
~?:,. ~ ::::
"" '
2°°°/ i!':::' -:',
131 -
Ped & Bike Trails
1999 2000 2001
Ped & Bike Tra~s
5-Year Projection
Wastewater
Pfoiect Name $999 2000 2001 2002
COURT HILL TRUNK SEWER 800,000
IOWA AVENUE SANI I'ARY SEWER 100,000
MELROSE MARKET SANITARY SEWER 46,866
N RVR CORRIDOPJB'JAYSWLLE 29,103
NAPOLEON PARK LIFT STATION 43,226
Wastewater
5-Year Projection
,.
2001 2002 2003
Water
Water
5*Year Projection
134 -
Stormwater
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
BEER CREEK STORM SEWER 4001000
CREEK,DRAINAGE ,MAINTENANCE 15,000 15,000 15,~00 15,009
EPA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 500,000
FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING 15,576
HWY 6 SIDEWALK/DRAINAGE 1 O0,00O 1,44~,000 600,000 500,000
MORMON TREKsABBEY LANE STORM 250~000
SEWER
N BRANCH BASIN EXCAVATION 100,000
S SYCAMORE REG, STRMWTR DET 1,158,531 700+000 500.~00
SANDUSKY STORM SEWER 8,634
SHAMROCFjPETERSON STORM 8,433
SEWER
SNYDER CREEK WA:FERSRED 344,460
400,000
60,000
500.900
15,576
250,000
lOOlO00
2.358,531
8,634
Stormwater
5-Year projection
2002 2003
Parks & Recreation
The Parks and Recreation category accounts for construction and improvements to all municipal parks and recreation areas.
Project Name
BENTON ST (NED ASHTON) PARK
CEMETERY BUILDING
RENOVATION/REPAIR
CITY PARK BUILDING/PARKING
IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PARK STAGE - RIVERSIDE
THEATER
FOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT
HOSPICE MEMORIAL
HUNTERS RUN PARK DEVELOPMENT
KIWANIS PARK
LEISURE POOL DEVELOPMENT
MERCER PARK BALL FIELD LIGHTING
NAPOLEON PARK SOFTBALL FIELDS
OPEN SPACE-LAND ACQUISITION
PARK ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAMS
PARK SHELTER IMPROVEMENTS
PARK-PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
PARK-RESTROOM REPLACE
/CONSTRUCT
PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT
PARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY
PARKS SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
PARKS-PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
PENINSULA PARK
SCOTT PARK DEV./BASIN EXCV.
SKATEBOARD PARK
SOUTH SITE SOCCER FIELDS
STURGIS FERRY PARK DEVELOPMENT
TENNIS COURT
RENOVATION/LIGHTING
WALDEN WOODS PARK
WATERWORKS PARK
WETHERBY PARK DEVELOPMENT
1999
62,351
20,000
8,000
266,153
277,664
50,000
45,000
23,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 Total
120,000
10,000
50,000
25,000
10,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
150,000
62,351
50,000
150,000
120,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000
8,000
300,000 300,000
266,153
250,000 250,000
200,000 200,000
277,664
50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
25,000 25,000 25,000 145,000
10,000 10,000 10,000 63,000
100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
40.000 40,000 40,000 160,000
25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
750,000
10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
13,000 100,000
7,000 250,000
838,682
35,000
12,000
250,000
100,000
120,000
75,000
250,000
100,000
225,000
750,000
30,000
80,000
113,000
257,000
100,000
838,682
35,000
120,000
75,000
512,000
100,000
- 136-
Parks & Recreation
2""7
Airport
Airport
5-Year Projection
2000 2001 2002
- 138-
Landfill
2000 2001 2002 2003 Tota~
500,000
2,800,000
Land~l
5-YearProjection
2002
2003
Other Projects
The Other Projects category accounts for a variety of construction and reconstruction projects that do not fall into any other category.
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
ANIMAL SHELTER CAT RUN 27,000
ANIMAL SHELTER-WEST WING 17,028
ART 100,000
CEMETERY EXPANSION 25,000
CIVIC CENTER - OTHER PROJECTS 50,000
CIVIC CENTER - ROOF PROJECTS 4,261
CIVIC CENTER HVAC 18,000
CIVIC CENTER NORTH 3RD FLOOR 1,550,000
CIVIC CENTER-HVAC
COPS GRANT 489,056
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE 3,333,187
ENT. TQ CITY-BEAUTIFICATION 60,000
FIRE APPARATUS
FIRE STATION-NEW
FY 96 BUS ACQUISITION 186,048
FY96 FIRE PUMPER 260,000
GIS COMPUTER PACKAGE
H.I.S. COMPUTER UPGRADE 172,725
IOWA AVENUE PARKING RAMP 12,800,000
LIBRARY COMPUTER REPLACEMENT 580,000
LIBRARY EXPANSION 22,500,000
LIBRARY ICN ROOM 76,000
LIBRARY-ROOF, HVAC, CARPET 169
MONTGOMERY/BUTLER HOUSE 24,173
PENINSULA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT 200,000
POL DISPATCH WINDOW REMODELING 10,520
POLICE SECOND FLOOR DESIGN 644,000
PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX 2,468,072
RAMP MAINTENANCE &REPAIR 317,322
RIVERSIDE DRIVE REDEVELOPMENT
SCANLON GYMNASIUM 1,657,640
SENIOR CENTER - HVAC RENOV 65,084
SR CENTER REPAIRS-PHASE II 175,238
TORNADO WARNING SIRENS 17,512
TRANSIT DOWNTOWN INTERCHANGE 211,110
TRANSIT METHANE PROJECT 400,000
TRANSIT PARKING LOT RESURFACE 150,000
100,000 100,000 100,000
350,000
50,000 50,000 50,000
180,000
200,000
164,000
1,700,000 1,000,000
30,000 30,000 30,000
300,000 350,000
100,000 600,000
300,000
100,000
50,000
30,000
1,000,000
300,000
330,000
2,000,000
Total
27,000
17,028
500,000
375,000
250,000
184,261
18,000
1,550,000
200,000
653,056
6,033,187
180,000
650,000
1,000.000
186.048
260,000
1,000,000
172,725
12.800,000
580,000
22,500,000
76,000
169
24,173
200,000
10,520
644,000
2,468,072
947,322
2,000,000
1,657,640
65,084
175,238
17,512
211,110
400,000
150,000
- 140 - --
Other Projects
Other Projects
5-Year Projection
~o0o0..'
3sooo-
2000 2001 2002 2003
Capital Improvement Projects
Summary by Revenue Category - All Categories
Fund Description
~01 - General Fund - Operations
5171 GEN FUND-NON OP ADM.
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS
5176 GEN FUND-PRKLND ACQ.
5179 GEN FUND-OTHER
Totals for General Fund - Operations
~02 - Parking Fund - Operations
5181 PARKING FUND
Totals for Parking Fund - Operations
103 - Wastewater- Operations
5182 WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Totals for Wastewater- Operations
104 - Water- Operations
5183 WATER FUND
Totals for Water- Operations
105 - Landfill - Operations
5185 SANITATION-LANDFILL
Totals for Landfill - Operations
106 - Road Use Tax - Operations
5120 ROAD USE TAX
Totals for Road Use Tax - Operations
107 - Other Funds, Operations
5190 MISCELLANEOUS TRANS
Totals for Other Funds - Operations
109 - Transit- Operations
5187 TRANSIT FUND
Totals for Transit - Operations
ffO - Federal Grants
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS
Totals for Federal Grants
111 - State Grants
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS
Totals for State Grants
112 - Interest Income
4511 INT. ON INVESTMENTS
Totals for Interest Income
113 - Interfund Loan
5900 INTERFUND LOANS
Totals for/nteffund Loan
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total
548,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
184,000
305,295 50,000 100,000 50,000 50,000
95,560
1,132,855 104000 150,000 104000 100,000
2,117,322
2,11~322
300,000
30~000
330,000
330,000
748,000
184,000
555,295
95,560
1,582,855
2,747,322
2,74~322
300,000 3,466,000 1,820,000 300,000 300,000 6,186,000
300,000 3,466,000 1,824000 304000 300,000 6,186,000
185,000 170,000 4,170,000 4,170,000 170,000 8,865,000
18~000 ~7~000 4,174000 4,170,000 170,000 8,86~000
3,300,000
3,30~000
1,486,210
1,486,2~0
4,786,210
4,786,210
3,498,409 2,196,000 900,000 1.238,000 1,840,000 9,672,409
3,498,409 2.196,000 900,000 1,238,000 1,840.000 9,672,409
555,546 164,000
555,546 154,000
183,667
I83,667
719,546
719,546
183,667
183,667
4,096,469 3,508,065 17,000 160,000 1,220,000 9,001,534
4,096469 3,508,065 1~000 164000 1,220.000 9,001,534
400,000
40~000
1,762,447
1,762,447
368,000
368,000
633,927
633,927
1,714,416
1,714,416
2,162,447
2,162,447
633,927
633.927
2,082,416
2,082,416
- 142-
Capital Improvement Projects
Summary by Revenue Category - All Categories
Fund Description 1999 2000
2001 2002 2003 Total
114 - Miscellaneous Revenue
4366 DEV FEE-SDWLK/PAVING 1,080
1,080
4372 CONTRACTED SERVICES 4,960
4410 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 667,000
4652 REIMB OF EXPENSES 74,685
4681 CONTRIB. &DONATIONS 3,221,898
4684 MISCELLANEOUS OTHER 1,446,000
Totals for Miscellaneous Revenue 5, 415, 623
~ ~ ~n~'~eneral Obligation
4,960
1,000,000 1,667,000
74,685
3,221.898
100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 2,146,000
100, 000 100, 000 1, 100, 000 400, 000 7, 115, 623
5,241,063
6,211,395
31,376,000
11,167,896 11,167,896
6,555,000 6,555,000
10,147,000 10,147,000
8,755,000 8,755,000
11,167,896 6,555,000 10,147,000 8,755,000 79,453,354
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 5,241,063
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 6,211,395
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 31,376,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
Totals for Bond - General Obligation 42,828,458
116 - Bond - Sewer Revenue
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS
5298 99 SEWER TRANSFERS
5299 00 SEWER TRANSFERS
5300 01 SEWER TRANSFERS
5301 02 SEWER TRANSFERS
Totals for Bond - Sewer Revenue
117 - Bond - Water Revenue
5396 99 WATER TRANSFERS
5399 00 WATER TRANSFERS
5400 01 WATER TRANSFERS
5401 02 WATER TRANSFERS
Totals for Bond - Water Revenue
118 - Bond Proceeds-Control
4711 SALE OF BONDS
Totals for Bond Proceeds-Control
GRAND TOTALS
3,665,575
6,882,732
10,548,307
9,029,447
9,029,447
9,834,000
15,140,000
400,000
9,834,000 1~14~000 40~000
4,720,000
26,913,000
300,000
4,72~000 26913,000 300,000
58.997,362 25,721,896 48,606,000 10,847,000
58,99~362 2~721,896 48,60&000 10,84~000
3,665,575
6,882,732
9,834,000
15,140,000
400,000
3~ 922, 307
9,029,447
4,720,000
26,913,000
300,000
4~962,447
!44,174,258
144,174,258
144,485,465 61,147,857 104,673,000 29,130,000 16,815,000 356,251,322
- 143 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source o Receipts Summary
Activity Project Name
Totals for 4366 - DEV FEE-SDWLK/PA VIN
Totals for 4372 - CONTRACTED SERVICE
Totals for 4410 - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Totals for 4426 - OTHER STATE GRANTS
Totals for 4431 - FEDERAL GRANTS
Totals for 4511 - INT. ON INVESTMENTS
Totals for 4652 - REIMB OF EXPENSES
Totals for 4681 - CONTRIB. & DONATION
Totals for 4684 - MISCELLANEOUS OTHE
Totals for 4711 - SALE OF BONDS
Totals for 5120 - ROAD USE TAX
Totals for 5171 - GEN FUND-NON OP AD
Totals for 5173 - GEN FUND-PARKS
Totals for 5176 - GEN FUND-PRKLND AC
Totals for 5179 - GEN FUND*OTHER
Totals for 5181 - PARKING FUND
Totals for 5182 * WASTEWA TER TREA TM
Totals for 5183 - WATER FUND
Totals for 5185 - SANITA TION-LANDFILL
Totals for 5187 - TRANSIT FUND
Totals for 5190 - MISCELLANEOUS TRAN
Totals for 5197 - TRANSFER IN - 97 GO
Totals for 5198 - TRANSFER IN - 98 GO
Totals for 5199 o TRANSFER IN - 99 GO
Totals for 5200 - TRANSFER IN - O0 GO
Totals for 5201 - TRANSFER IN - 01 GO
Totals for 5202 - TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
Totals for 5203 - TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
Totals for 5297 - 97 SEWER TRANSFERS
Totals for 5298 - 99 SEWER TRANSFERS
Totals for 5299 - O0 SEWER TRANSFERS
Totals for 5300 - 01 SEWER TRANSFERS
Totals for 5301 - 02 SEWER TRANSFERS
Totals for 5398 - 99 WATER TRANSFERS
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total
1,080 1,080
4, 960 4, 960
667, 000 1,000, 000 1,667, 000
1,762,447 400,000 2,162,447
4, 096, 469 3,508, 065 17, 000 160, 000 1,220, 000 9. O01,534
633,927 633, 927
74.685 74, 685
3,221,898 3,221,898
1,446, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 400, 000 2, 146, 000
58,997,362 25,721,896 48,608,000 10,847,000 144, 174,258
3, 498, 409 2, 196, 000 900, 000 1,238, 000 1, 84 O, 000 9, 672, 409
548, 000 50, 000 50. 000 50. 000 50, 000 748, 000
184, 000 184, 000
305. 295 50, 000 100, 000 50, 000 50, 000 555, 295
95, 560 95, 560
2,117,322 300,000 330,000 2,747,322
300, 000 3, 466, 000 1,820, 000 300, 000 300, 000 6, 186, 000
185,000 170,000 4,170,000 4,170,000 170,000 8,865,000
1,486,210 3,300,000 4,786,210
183, 667 183, 667
555,546 164,000 719,546
5,241,063 5,241,063
6,211,395 6,2fl,395
31,376,000 31,376,000
11.167,896 11,167,896
6, 555, 000 5,555, 000
10,147,000 10.147,000
8, 755, 000 8, 755, 000
3, 665, 575 3, 665, 575
6, 882, 732 6, 882, 732
9, 834, 000 9, 834,000
15, 140,000 15, 140,000
400, 000 400, 000
9,029,447 9,029,447
- 144 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Summary
Activity Project Name 1999 2000
Totals for 5399 - O0 WATER TRANSFERS 4, 720,000
Totals for 5400 - 01 WATER TRANSFERS
Totals for 5401 - 02 WATER TRANSFERS
Totals for 5900 - INTERFUND LOANS 1.714.416
Receipts Total: 144,485,465 61,147,857
GRAND TOTALS 144,485,465 61,147,857
2001
26,913.000
104,673,000
104,673,000
2002
300, 000
368, 000
29,130,000
29, 130, 000
2003
16,81~000
1~81~000
Total
4,720,000
26,913.000
304000
Z082.416
35~251,322
35~251,322
145 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999
2000 2001 2002 2003 Total
4366 DEV FEE-SDWLK/PA VING
35500 SUMMIT ST BRIDGE 1,080
REPLACEMENT
Totals for 4366 - DEV FEE-SDWLK/PA VIN 1,080
1,080
1,080
4372 CONTRACTED SERVICES
38515 ANIMAL SHELTER CAT RUN 4,960
Totals for 4372 - CONTRACTED SERVICE 4,960
4410 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
34710 IA RIVER TRAIL- 67,000
BURIJNAPOLEON
34740 IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE
34850 RIVER ST PAVING 600,000
Totals for 4410 - LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 667,000
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS
35310 BURL ST BRIDGE/RALSTON
CREEK
34690 BURLINGTON/MADISON TO 71,601
GILBERT
34860 HWY 1/SUNSET - RIGHT TURN 43,900
34870 HWY 6/1ST AVE - LEFT TURN 48.300
34710 IA RIVER TRAIL- 750,000
BURL/NAPOLEON
35770 MELROSE AVENUE BRIDGE 10,000
34290 S SYCAMORE PEG. STRMWTR 200,000
PET.
34160 SNYDER CREEK WATERSHED 258,345
35720 WOOLF AVE. BRIDGE 360,101
RECONSTRUCT.
Totals for 4426 - OTHER STATE GRANTS 1.762,447
443f FEDERAL GRANTS
17,000
4,960
4,960
67,000
1.000,000 1,000,000
600,000
1, 00~ 000 1.66~ 000
400,000 400,000
71,801
43,900
48,300
750,000
10,000
200,000
.258,345
380,101
400,000 2,162,447
160,000
900,000
160,000 -
160,000
366,510
900.000
160,000
146,425
17,000
946,000
196,000
4,542,963
160,000 160,000
789,570
177,066
320,000
120,000
17, 000 160, 000 1,220, 000 9, O01,534
35350 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE
38890 COPS GRANT 366,510
34440 DODGE STREET PAVING
35390 F STREET BRIDGE
36920 FY 96 BUS ACQUISITION 146,425
34995 GILBERT ST IAIS UNDERPASS
34130 HWY 6 SIDEWALK/DRAINAGE 946,000
38681 LONGFELLOW/PINE ST PEP 196,000
TRAIL
37480 MASTER PLAN-LAND 2.176,898 2,366.065
ACQUISITION
35330 MEADOW STREET BRIDGE
35500 SUMMIT ST BRIDGE 789.570
REPLACEMENT
36940 TRANSIT DOWNTOWN 177,066
INTERCHANGE
36950 TRANSIT METHANE PROJECT 320,000
36930 TRANSIT PARKING LOT 120,000
RESURFACE
Totals for 4431 - FEDERAL GRANTS 4,096,469 3,508,065
- 146 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Deta~
Activity Project Name 1999 2000
4511 INT. ON INVESTMENTS
33930 97 SEWER REV BOND 279,869
CONTROL
39200 APR 97 G.O. BOND ISSUE 23,000
39400 APR 98 G.O. BOND ISSUE 210,000
39310 NOV 97 G.O. BOND ISSUE- 121,058
WATER
Totals for 4511 - INT. ON INVESTMENTS 633, 927
2001
2002
2003
Total
279,869
23,000
210,000
121,058
633, 927
4652 REIMB OF EXPENSES
: 35770 MELROSE AVENUE BRIDGE 71.523 71,523
34420 SOUTHGATE AVE. EXTENSION 3,162 3,162
Totals for 4652 - REIMB OF EXPENSES 74, 685 74, 685
468'~' C~N~;RIB. & DONATIONS~ ...................................
36260 IOWA AVENUE PARKING RAMP
38380 PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX
38190 SCANLON GYMNASIUM
34160 SNYDER CREEK WATERSHED
Totals for 4681 - CONTRIB. & DONATION
1,500,000
1,380,000
255,783
86,115
3,221,898
4684 MISCELLANEOUS OTHER
38595 ART 100,000 100,000 100,000
38770 CIVIC CENTER NORTH 3RD 696,000
FLOOR
38880 FIRE STATION-NEW
37210 NE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT 750,000
Totals for 4684 - MISCELLANEOUS OTHE 1,446,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
4711 SALE OF BONDS
33950 00 SEWER REV BOND 9,834,000
CONTROL
31940 00 WATER REV BOND 4,720,000
CONTROL
33960 01 SEWER REVENUE BOND 15,140,000
CONTROL
31950 01 WATER REV BOND 26,913,000
CONTROL
33970 02 SEWER REV BOND 400,000
CONTROL
31960 02 WATER REV BOND 300,000
CONTROL
39600 1999 G.O. BOND ISSUE 33,297,362
39700 2000 G.O. BOND ISSUE 11,167,896
39800 2001 G.O. BOND ISSUE 6.555,000
39900 2002 G.O. BOND ISSUE 10.147.000
33940 99 SEWER REV BOND 7.000,000
CONTROL
31930 99 WATER REV BOND 9,200.000
CONTROL
36260 IOWA AVENUE PARKING RAMP 9,500,000
Totals for4711 - SALE OF BONDS 58,997,362 25,721,896 48,608,000 10,847.000
1,500,000
1,380,000
255,783
86,115
3,221,898
100,000 400,000
696,000
300.000
40~000
300,000
750,000
2,146,000
9,834.000
4,720,000
15,140,000
26,913,000
400,000
300,000
33.297,362
11,167.896
6,555,000
10.147,000
7.000,000
9.200,000
9,500,000
144,174,258
147 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity
5~0
35350
37410
34585
34765
34760
34770
35210
35310
34657
34690
34980
34981
34960
34170
34755
34440
34565
38315
34720
35390
34920
34950
34930
34866
34530
34415
34995
34860
34130
34870
38680
34740
38640
344:30
38681
35330
34510
35770
34845
34840
Project Name 1999 2000
ROAD USE TAX
2ND AVENUE BRIDGE
AIRPORT NORTH 200,000
COMMERCIAL PARK
BENTON-ORCHARD/OAKNOLL 4.323
BIENNIAL ASPHALT/CHIP SEAL 395.000 606.000
BIENNIAL BRICK ST
RECONSTRUCTION
BIENNIAL P.C.C. MAINTENANCE
BROOKSIDE DRIVE BRIDGE (1,967)
BURL ST BRIDGE/RALSTON
CREEK
BURLINGTON/GOVERNOR 6,527
SIGNALS
BURLINGTON/MADISON TO 10,000
GILBERT
CAPTAIN IRISH PKWY- 250,000
ACT/DODGE
CAPTAIN IRISH PKWY-
SCOTT/ROCH.
COURT ST EXTENDED PHASE I 37.673
CREEK-DRAINAGE 15,000
MAINTENANCE
CURB RAMPS - A.D.A. 301,104 250,000
DODGE STREET PAVING
DUBUQUE ST ELEVATION 60,000
ENT. TO CITY-BEAUTIFICATION 60.000 30,000
EXTRA WIDTH SIDEWALK 29,993
F STREET BRIDGE
FIRST AVENUE EXTENDED 24.344
FOSTER RD-DBQ/PRAIRIE DU
CHIEN
FOSTER RD-W OF DUB THRU 145,800 400,000
ELKS
FOSTER RD/DUBUQUE
INTERSECTION
FY99 PAVEMENT MARKING 136.500 50,000
GILBERT ST CORRIDOR STUDY 76,020
GILBERT ST IAIS UNDERPASS
HWY 1/SUNSET - RIGHT TURN 24,460
HWY 6 SIDEWALK/DRAI NAGE 100,000 100,000
HWY 6/1ST AVE - LEFT TURN 24,625
INTRA-CITY BIKE TRAILS 20,000 30,000
IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE 26.673
KIWANIS PARK 10,000
L MUSCATINE-
DEFOREST/SPRUCE
LONGFELLOW/PINE ST PED 50,000
TRAIL
MEADOW STREET BRIDGE
MELROSE AVENUE 21,741
MELROSE AVENUE BRIDGE (38,937)
MORMON TREK-ABBEY 100,000
LANE/HWY 1
MORMON TREK- 12,000
BENTON/MELROSE
2001 2002 2003 Total
50,000 50,000
200,000
4,323
50,000 220,000 50,000 1.321,000
60,000 165,000 225,000
100,000 220,000 320.000
(1,967)
300,000 300,000
6,527
10,000
250,000
200,000 200,000
37,673
15,000 15,000 15,000 60,000
100,000 651,104
100,000 100,000
60,000
30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000
29,993
40,000 40,000
100,000 124,344
75,000 75,000
545,800
100,000 100,000
50.000 50,000 50,000 336.500
76,020
50,000 50,000
24,460
100,000 50,000 350,000
24,625
30,000 80,000
200,000 200,000 426,673
10,000
100,000 100,000
50,000
40.000 40,000
21,741
(38,937)
100.000
12,000
- 148 - '
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding SourCe - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999
9122 MORMON TREK-R/R OVERPASS
34270 MORMON TREK/ABBEY LANE
STORM SEWER
34641 MORMON TREK/ROHRET ROAD 18,060
34750 OVRWDTH PAV/EXTRA WDTH 20,000
SIDWLK
35370 PARK RD BRIDGE APPROACH
34890 PARK RD/RIVERSIDE-LEFT
TURN
38380 PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX 88,072
34850 RIVER ST PAVING 200.000
34991 RR CROSSINGS-CITY WIDE 69.113
34745 SCOTT BLVD SIDEWALK 60.000
34925 SOUTH AREA ARTERIAL 80,000
34420 SOUTHGATE AVE. EXTENSION 510.829
35500 SUMMIT ST BRIDGE 626.816
REPLACEMENT
34380 SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE 25.000
TILES
34590 SYCAMORE-BURNS TO CITY
LIMITS
34635 TRAFFIC CALMING 30,640
34600 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS 94,000
Totals for 5120 - ROAD USE TAX 3,498,409
5171 GEN FUND-NON OP ADM.
37410 AIRPORT NORTH 75,000
COMMERCIAL PARK
38130 CEMETERY EXPANSION 25,000
38750 CIVIC CENTER - OTHER 50.000
PROJECTS
38770 CIVIC CENTER NORTH 3RD 154.000
FLOOR
38365 PENINSULA PROPERTY 200,000
DEVELOPMENT
38850 POLICE SECOND FLOOR 44,000
DESIGN
Totals for 5171 - GEN FUND-NON OP AD 548,000
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS
38931 FOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT 10.000
38975 HICKORY HILLS TRAIL DEV 44,000
38640 KIWANIS PARK 30,000
38980 PARK ACCESSIBILITY 20,000
PROGRAMS
38650 PARK SHELTER 13.000
IMPROVEMENTS
38570 PARKS MAINTENANCE 50,000
FACILITY
38960 PARKS SIDEWALK 5,000
REPLACEMENT
38990 PARKS-PARKING LOT 5,000
IMPROVEMENTS
38924 SCOTT PARK DEV./BASIN 7,000
EXCV.
Totals for 5173 - GEN FUND-PARKS 184,000
2000 2001
75,000
40,000 40,000
20,000 20,000
25,000
25,000 25,000
120.000 130.000
2,196,000 900,000
50,000 50.000
5~000 5~000
- 149 -
2002
40,000
28.000
20,000
25.000
35,000
1,238,000
50,000
50,000
2003
150,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
Total
150,000
75,000
18,060
180,000
28,000
30,000
88,072
200,000
149,113
60,000
80,000
510,829
626,816
25,000 75,000
200,000 200,000
25,000 130,640
140,000 519,000
1,844000 9,672,409
75,000
25,000
50,000 250,000
154,000
200,000
44,000
54000 748,000
10,000
44,000
30,000
20,000
13,000
50,000
5,000
5,000
7,000
184,000
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999 2000
2001 2002 2003 Total
5176
38925
38390
38690
38950
38190
38940
Totals
5179
38515
38760
38355
38840
GEN FUND-PRKLND A CQ.
BENTON ST (NED ASHTON)
30,295 30,295
PARK
CEMETERY BUILDING
RENOVATION/REPAIR
OPEN SPACE-LAND 50,000 50,000
ACQUISITION
PENINSULA PARK 13,000
SCANLON GYMNASIUM 200,000
WATERWORKS PARK 12,000
for 5176 - GEN FUND-PRKLND AC 305,295
GEN FUND-OTHER
ANIMAL SHELTER CAT RUN 7,040
CIVIC CENTER HVAC 18,000
H.I.S. COMPUTER UPGRADE 60,000
POL DISPATCH WINDOW 10,520
REMODELING
50,000
50,000
Totals for 5179 - GEN FUND-OTHER
5181 PARKING FUND
9~560
36260 IOWA AVENUE PARKING RAMP
36600 RAMP MAINTENANCE &
REPAIR
Totals for 5181 - PARKING FUND
5182 WASTEWATER TREATMENT '~
33870 PHASE Ill-NEW SOUTH PLANT
33210 SEWER MAIN PROJECTS- 300,000
ANNUAL
Totals for 5182- WASTEWA TER TREA TM 300,000
5183 WATER FUND
34850 RIVER ST PAVING 185,000
31210 WATER MAIN PROJECTS-
ANNUAL
31610 WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Totals for 5183 - WATER FUND 185,000
5185 SANITA TION-LANDFILL
32210 FY 98 CELL CONSTRUCTION 497,027
32240 HAZARDOUS WASTE 620,000
RECYCLING FAC
9110 LANDFILL AIR QUALITY
PERMITTING
32220 LANDFILL CELL-FY 2003
32120 LEACHATE MONITORING 69,183
38380 PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX 300,000
Totals for 5185 - SANITA TION-LANDFILL 1,486,210
1,800,000
317,322
~ 11~322
50,000
50,000 50,000 250,000
5aooo 100,000 54000 54000
300,000
304000
3,166,000 1,520,000
300,000 300,000
3,46~000 1,820,000
13,000
200,000
12,000
555,295
300,000
304000
170,000 170,000 170,000
4,000,000 4,000,000
170,000 ~ 170,000 4,170,000
7,040
18,000
60,000
10,520
9~560
1,800,000
330,000 947,322
334000 ~74~322
4,686,000
300,000 1,500,000
300,000 6,186,000
185,000
170,000 680,000
8,000,000
170,000 8,86~000
497,027
620,000
500,000 500,000
2,800,000 2,800,000
69,183
300,000
3.300,000 4,78~210
- 150-
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Deta~
Activity Project Name
5187 TRANSIT FUND
36920 FY 96 BUS ACQUISITION
36940 TRANSIT DOWNTOWN
INTERCHANGE
36950 TRANSIT METHANE PROJECT
36930 TRANSIT PARKING LOT
RESURFACE
Totals for 5187 - TRANSIT FUND
5190 MISCELLANEOUS TRANS
38515 ANIMAL SHELTER CAT RUN
38890 COPS GRANT
38860 FY96 FIRE PUMPER
38985 HOSPICE MEMORIAL
38555 LIBRARY COMPUTER
REPLACEMENT
Totals for 5190 - MISCELLANEOUS TRAN
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO
38510 ANIMAL SHELTER-WEST WING
38720 CIVIC CENTER - ROOF
PROJECTS
31380 COLLECTOR WELLS-LOWER
TERMINUS
31360 COLLEGE STREET MAIN
38970 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE
34140 FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING
31513 GROUND STORAGE
RESERVOIR
31515 IA RIVER POWER DAM IMPR.
38640 KIWANIS PARK
38560 LIBRARY-ROOF, HVAC, CARPET
31514 RAW WATER MAIN-PHASE 1
34230 SANDUSKY STORM SEWER
34260 SHAMROCK/PETERSON
STORM SEWER
38929 SOUTH SITE SOCCER FIELDS
38645 STURGIS FERRY PARK
DEVELOPMENT
31518 WATER FACILITY SITE DEV.,
PH 1
31335 WATER MAIN, PHASE IlIA
31340 WATER MAIN, PHASE IV
31510 WATER TREATMENT FACILITY
31519 WELL HOUSE IMPROVEMENTS
31517 WILLIAMS PIPELINE
RELOCATION
34780 WILLOW CREEK TRAIL
Totals for 5197 - TRANSFER IN - 97 GO
1999 2000 2001 2002
39,623
34,044
80,000
30,000
183,667
2003 Total
39,623
34,044
80,000
30,000
185667
15,000
122,546
260,000
8,000
150,000
55~546
17,028
4,261
748,088
200,000
403,187
15,576
4,169
83,869
161,493
169
138,114
8,634
8,433
138,682
35,000
2,449,705
5,637
512,019
257,574
(14,515)
1,280
62,660
5,241,063
164,000
164,000
15,000
286,546
260,000
8,000
150,000
719,546
17,028
4,261
748,088
200,000
403,187
15,576
4,169
83,869
161,493
169
138,114
8.634
8,433
138,682
35,000
2,449,705
5,637
512,019
257,574
(14,515)
1,280
62,660
5,241,063
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity
5198
38925
34980
34960
38970
34860
34870
34710
34740
38640
38360
38930
38570
34850
34290
38929
34420
34780
35720
Totals
Project Name 1999 2000
TRANSFER IN - 9~ GO
BENTON ST (NED ASHTON) 32,056
PARK
CAPTAIN IRISH PKWY- 313,711
ACT/DODGE
COURT ST EXTENDED PHASE I 597,944
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE 1,220,000
HWY 1/SUNSET - RIGHT TURN 31,100
HWY 6/1ST AVE - LEFT TURN 26.700
IA RIVER TRAIL- 694.374
BURL/NAPOLEON
IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE 139,785
KIWANIS PARK 39,660
MONTGOMERY/BUTLER HOUSE 24,173
NAPOLEON PARK SOFTBALL 277,664
FIELDS
PARKS MAINTENANCE 700,000
FACILITY
RIVER ST PAVING 1,013,109
S SYCAMORE REG. STRMWTR 158,531
DET.
SOUTH SITE SOCCER FIELDS 400,000
SOUTHGATE AVE. EXTENSION 200,000
WILLOW CREEK TRAIL 62,698
WOOLF AVE. BRIDGE 279,890
RECONSTRUCT.
for 5198 - TRANSFER IN - 98 GO
~211.395
2001
2002
2003 Total
32,056
313,711
597,944
1,220,000
31,100
26,700
694,374
139,785
39,660
24,173
277,664
700,000
1,013,109
158,531
400,000
200,000
62,698
279,890
~21f,395
- 152-
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999 2000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO
38595 ART
34980 CAPTAIN IRISH PKWY-
ACT/DODGE
38770 CIVIC CENTER NORTH 3RD
FLOOR
38970 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE
38931 FOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT
34740 IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE
38640 KIWANIS PARK
38555 LIBRARY COMPUTER
REPLACEMENT
38550 LIBRARY EXPANSION
38565 LIBRARY ICN ROOM
37480 MASTER PLAN-LAND
ACQUISITION
38980 PARK ACCESSIBILITY
PROGRAMS
38650 PARK SHELTER
IMPROVEMENTS
38691 PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT
38960 PARKS SIDEWALK
REPLACEMENT
38990 PARKS-PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS
38850 POLICE SECOND FLOOR
DESIGN
38380 PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX
34850 RIVER ST PAVING
34290 S SYCAMORE REG. STRMWTR
DET.
38190 SCANLON GYMNASIUM
38929 SOUTH SITE SOCCER FIELDS
35500 SUMMIT ST BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT
Totals for 5199 - TRANSFER IN - 99 GO
100,000
1,600,000
700,000
1,710,000
10,000
100,000
25,000
370,000
22,500,000
76,000
300,000
25,000
10,000
25,000
5,000
15,000
600,000
700,000
550,000
800,000
700,000
300,000
155,000
31,376000
2001 2002 2003 To~I
100,000
1,600,000
700,000
1,710,000
10,000
100,000
25,000
370,000
22,500,000
76,000
300,000
25,000
10,000
25,000
5,000
15,000
600.000
700,000
550,000
800,000
700,000
300,000
155,000
31,376,000
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
~00 TRANSFER IN - O0 GO
37320 AIRPORT TERMINAL
34765 BIENNIAL ASPHALT/CHIP SEAL
38130 CEMETERY EXPANSION
38635 CITY PARK STAGE -
RIVERSIDE THEATER
38720 CIVIC CENTER - ROOF
PROJECTS
38970 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE
34565 DUBUQUE ST ELEVATION
38870 FIRE APPARATUS
38931 FOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT
34930 FOSTER RD-W OF DUB THRU
ELKS
34130 HWY 6 SIDEWALK/DRAINAGE
37480 MASTER PLAN-LAND
ACQUISITION
34845 MORMON TREK-ABBEY
LANE/HWY 1
34270 MORMON TREK/ABBEY LANE
STORM SEWER
38980 PARK ACCESSIBILITY
PROGRAMS
38650 PARK SHELTER
IMPROVEMENTS
38920 PARK-PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT
38655 PARK-RESTROOM REPLACE
/CONSTRUCT
38691 PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT
38960 PARKS SIDEWALK
REPLACEMENT
38990 PARKS-PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS
38950 PENINSULA PARK
34290 S SYCAMORE PEG. STRMWTR
DET.
38150 SKATEBOARD PARK
38155 TENNIS COURT
RENOVATION/LIGHTING
38910 WALDEN WOODS PARK
38940 WATERWORKS PARK
38625 WETFII;;~DY DARK
DEVELOPMENT
34780 WILLOW CREEK TRAIL
Totals for 5200 - TRANSFER IN - O0 GO
700,000
200,000
350,000
120,000
180,000
1,700,000
300.000
300.000
10,000
1.980,000
400.000
262.896
2.400,000
175,000
25,000
10.000
100,000
40,000
50,000
5,000
15,000
100,000
700,000
100,000
120.000
75,000
250,000
100,000
400,000
11,16~896
Total
700.000
200,000
350,000
120,000
180,000
1,700,000
300,000
300,000
10,000
1,980,000
400,000
262,896
2,400,000
175,000
25,000
10,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
5,000
15,000
100,000
700,000
100,000
120,000
75,000
250,000
100,000
400,000
11,16~896
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002
5201 TRANSFER IN, 01 GO
9135 AIRPORT UNDERGROUND
TANK REPLACEMENT
34250 BEER CREEK STORM SEWER
34760 BIENNIAL BRICK ST
RECONSTRUCTION
34770 BIENNIAL P.C.C. MAINTENANCE
9125 CITY PARK BUILDING/PARKING
IMPROVEMENTS
38760 CIVIC CENTER-HVAC
38970 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE
34110 EPA STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
38931 FOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT
34995 GILBERT ST IAIS UNDERPASS
38350 GIS COMPUTER PACKAGE
38660 HUNTERS RUN PARK
DEVELOPMENT
34130 HWY 6 SIDEWALK/DRAINAGE
34740 IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE
9126 LEISURE POOL DEVELOPMENT
9108 MERCER PARK BALL FIELD
LIGHTING
38980 PARK ACCESSIBILITY
PROGRAMS
38650 PARK SHELTER
IMPROVEMENTS
38920 PARK-PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT
38655 PARK-RESTROOM REPLACE
/CONSTRUCT
38691 PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT
38960 PARKS SIDEWALK
REPLACEMENT
38990 PARKS-PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS
31330 PENINSULNDUBUQUE RD-PH 3
34290 S SYCAMORE REG. STRMWTR
DET.
34380 SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE
TILES
Totals for 5201 - TRANSFER IN - 01 GO
345,000
400,000
100,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
1,000,000
500,000
10,000
183,000
100,000
300,000
400,000
1,300,000
250,000
200,000
25.000
10,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
5,000
15,000
247,000
500,000
25,000
~555,000
2003 Total
345,000
400,000
100,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
1,000,000
500,000
10,000
183,000
100,000
300,000
400,000
1,300,000
250,000
200,000
25,000
10,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
5,000
15,000
247,000
500,000
25,000
6,55~000
- 155-
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
2003 Total
35350 2ND AVENUE BRIDGE
34765 BIENNIAL ASPHALT/CHIP SEAL
34981 CAPTAIN IRISH PKWY-
SCOTT/ROCH.
34755 CURB RAMPS - A.D.A.
38870 FIRE APPARATUS
34920 FIRST AVENUE EXTENDED
38931 FOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT
34950 FOSTER RD-DBQ/PRAIRIE DU
CHIEN
38350 GIS COMPUTER PACKAGE
38975 HICKORY HILLS TRAIL DEV
34130 HWY 6 SIDEWALK/DRAINAGE
38680 INTRA-CITY BIKE TRAILS
34740 IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE
38980 PARK ACCESSIBILITY
PROGRAMS
35370 PARK RD BRIDGE APPROACH
38650 PARK SHELTER
IMPROVEMENTS
38920 PARK-PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT
38655 PARK-RESTROOM REPLACE
/CONSTRUCT
38691 PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT
38960 PARKS SIDEWALK
REPLACEMENT
38990 PARKS-PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS
34380 SUMP PUMP DISCHARGE
TILES
34600 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS
Totals for 5202 - TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
90,000
600,000
4,800,000
150,000
350,000
1,400,000
10,000
375,000
600,000
150,000
450,000
30,000
500,000
25,000
272,000
10,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
5,000
15,000
25,000
100,000
1~14~000
g0,000
600,000
4,800,000
150,000
350,000
1,400,000
10,000
375,000
600,000
150,000
450,000
30,000
500,000
25.000
272,000
10,000
100,000
40,000
50,000
5,000
15,000
25,000
100,000
1~147,000
- 156 - '
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name 1999
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
34440 DODGE STREET PAVING
35390 F STREET BRIDGE
38880 FIRE STATION-NEW
38931 FOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT
34866 FOSTER RD/DUBUQUE
INTERSECTION
38350 GIS COMPUTER PACKAGE
38680 INTRA-CITY BIKE TRAILS
34430 L MUSCATINE-
DEFOREST/SPRUCE
35330 MEADOW STREET BRIDGE
9122 MORMON TREK-R/R OVERPASS
34340 N BRANCH BASIN EXCAVATION
38980 PARK ACCESSIBILITY
PROGRAMS
34890 PARK RD/RIVERSIDE-LEFT
TURN
38650 PARK SHELTER
IMPROVEMENTS
38920 PARK-PLAYGROUND
EQUIPMENT
38655 PARK*RESTROOM REPLACE
/CONSTRUCT
38691 PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT
38960 PARKS SIDEWALK
REPLACEMENT
38990 PARKS-PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENTS
38310 RIVERSIDE DRIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
38924 SCOTT PARK DEV./BASIN
EXCV.
34590 SYCAMORE-BURNS TO CITY
LIMITS
38940 WATERWORKS PARK
Totals for 5203 - TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS
33310 MELROSE MARKET SANITARY 804
SEWER
33570 N RVR CORRIDOR/B'JAYSVILLE 29,103
33830 NAPOLEON PARK LIFT 43,226
STATION
33640 SCOTT BLVD TRUNK SEWER 118,595
33820 SEWER CONNECTION - N & S 76,921
PLANT
33540 SHERIDAN AVE SANITARY 17,983
SEWER
33850 SOUTH RIVER CORRIDOR 78,768
SEWER
33550 WESTMINISTER RD SANITARY 5,005
33860 WILLOW CREEK SANITARY 3,295,170
SEWER
Totals for 5297 - 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 3,665,575
2O00
2001
2002 2003 Total
600,000 600,000
120,000 120,000
700,000 700,000
10,000 10,000
950,000 950,000
300,000 300,000
30,000 30,000
600,000 600,000
150,000 150,000
1,250,000 1,250,000
100,000 100,000
25,000 25,000
200,000 200,000
10,000 10,000
100,000 100,000
40,000 40,000
50,000 50,000
5,000 5,000
15.000 15,000
2,000,000 2,000,000
250,000 250,000
1,000,000 1,000,000
250,000 250,000
8,75~000 8.75~000
804
29,103
43,226
118,595
76,921
17.983
78,768
5,005
3,295,170
3,665,575
- 157 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
A~ivi~
5298
33310
33530
33850
33550
33860
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Total
99 SEWER TRANSFERS
MELROSE MARKET SANITARY 46,062
SEWER
RIVER STREET SEWER 208,000
SOUTH RIVER CORRIDOR 600,000
SEWER
WESTMINISTER RD SANITARY 420,000
WILLOW CREEK SANITARY 5,608,670
SEWER
Totals for 5298 - 99 SEWER TRANSFERS 6, 882, 732
46,062
208,000
600,000
420,000
5,608,670
6, 882. 732
5299 O0 SEWER TRANSFERS
33870 PHASE Ill-NEW SOUTH PLANT 4,634,000
33890 SOUTH PLANT DIGESTERS 5,000,000
Totals for 5299 - O0 SEWER TRANSFERS 9,834,000
5300 '
33410
4,834,000
5,000,000
9,834,000
COURT HILL TRUNK SEWER 800,000 800,000
33510 IOWA AVENUE SANITARY 100,000 100,000
SEWER
33870 PHASE Ill-NEW SOUTH PLANT 7,640,000 7,640,000
33390 ROHRET SOUTH SEWER 800,000 800,000
33890 SOUTH PLANT DIGESTERS 5,000,000 5,000,000
33430 WEST SIDE TRUNK SEWER 800,000 800,000
Totals for 5300 - 01 SEWER TRANSFERS 15, 140,000 15, 140,000
5301 02 SEWER TRANSFERS
33620 SCOTT PARK AREA TRUNK 400,000 400.000
SEWER
Totals for 5301 - 02 SEWER TRANSFERS 400, 000 400, 000
5398
31380
31515
31120
31370
31518
31335
31320
31340
31510
Tota~
99 WATER TRANSFERS
COLLECTOR WELLS-LOWER
TERMINUS
IA RIVER POWER DAM IMPR.
PENINSULA SITE DEV. - PHASE
SAND PIT PUMP STATION-L.T.
WATER FACILITY SITE DEV.,
PH 1
WATER MAIN, PHASE IlIA
WATER MAIN. PHASE IIIB
WATER MAIN, PHASE IV
WATER TREATMENT FACILITY
for 5398 - 99 WATER TRANSFERS
715.000
485,685
1.600,000
800,000
1,725,262
1,366,000
1,365,000
819,500
153,000
9,029,447
715,000
485,685
1,600,000
800,000
1,725,262
1,366,000
1,365,000
819.500
153,000
9,029,447
- 158 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail
Activity Project Name
~399 O0 WATER TRANSFERS
31380 COLLECTOR WELLS - L. T.
31390 COLLECTOR WELLS - U. T.
31350 S WASTEWATER PLANT-
WATER LINE
31370 SAND PIT PUMP STATION
31220 SYCAMORE STORAGE
RESERVOIR CONCRETE
REPAIR
Totals for 5399 - O0 WATER TRANSFERS
5400 01 WATER TRANSFERS ....
31330 PENINSULNDUBUQUE RD-PH 3
31335 WATER MAIN PENINSULA PH
3A
31610 WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Totals for 5400 - 01 WATER TRANSFERS
5401 02 WATER TRANSFERS
34950 FOSTER RD-DBQ/PRAIRIE DU
CHIEN
Totals for 5401 - 02 WATER TRANSFERS
5900 INTERFUND LOANS
37330 AIRPORT CORPORATE
HANGAR
37310 AIRPORT SE T-HANGAR
37320 AIRPORT TERMINAL
38355 H.I.S. COMPUTER UPGRADE
38190 SCANLON GYMNASIUM
38530 SENIOR CENTER - HVAC
RENOV
38580 SR CENTER REPAIRS-PHASE
38830 TORNADO WARNING SIRENS
Totals for 5900 - INTERFUND LOANS
Receipts Total:
GRAND TOTALS
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
1,670,000
1,900,000
300,000
650,000
200,000
4, 720, 000
1.313,000
1,600,000
24,000,000
2~913,000
300,000
304000
750,000
92,000
112,725
501.857
65,084
175,238
17,512
1,714,416
144,485,465
144,485.465
61,147,857
61, 147,857
1o4,673, ooo
lo4,673,ooo
368,000
368, 000
29,130,000
29,130,000
16,815,000
16,815,000
To~l
1,670,000
1,900,000
300,000
650,000
200,000
4,724000
1,313,000
1,600,000
24,000,000
2~913,000
300,000
304000
750,000
368,000
92,000
112,725
501,857
65,084
175,238
17,512
2.082,416
35~251,322
356,251,322
- 159 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
4711 SALE OF BONDS 9.834.000 9,834.000
Receipts Total .' 9,834,000 9.834,000
4711 SALE OF BONDS 4.720,000 4.720,000
Receipts Total: 4, 720, 000 4,720, 000
4711 SALE OF BONDS 15,140.000 15.140,000
Receipts Total: 15, 140, 000 15, 140, 000
4711 SALE OF BONDS 26.913.000 26,913,000
Receipts Total: 26.913.000 26,913,000
4711 SALE OF BONDS 400,000 400,000
Receipts Total .' 400. 000 400, 000
4711 SALE OF BONDS 300,000 300.000
Receipts Total: 300, 000 300, 000
4711 SALE Of BONDS 33.297,362 33,297.362
Receipts Total: 33,297,362 33,297,362
8111 FINANCIAL SERV & CHG 124,000 124,000
9590 MISC. TRANSFERS 31.376.000 31,376,000
Expense Total 31,500,000 31,500,000
4711
4711
~ 2000 G.O. BOND ISSUE - Bond proceeds to fund projects listed in 'Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Deta~" for receip~ 5200.
SALE OF BONDS 11.167,896 11.167,896
Receipts Total: 11.167,896 11,167,896
1200f G.O. BOND ISSUE - Bond proceeds to fund projects listed in 'Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail' for receipt~ 5201.
SALE OF BONDS 6.555.000 6,555,000
Receipts Total: 6, 555, 000 6, 555, 000
~ { 2002 G.O. BOND ISSUE - Bond proceeds to fund projects listed in 'Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail" for receipt~ 5202.
4711 SALE OF BONDS 10,147,000 10,147,000
Receipts Total: 10, 147,000 10, 14 7, 000
- 160 -
Activity
4431
5120
5202
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
12ND AVENUE BRIDGE - This project will replace the bridge over Ralston Creek at Second Avenue and will include sidewalks.
FEDERAL GRANTS 160.000 160,000
ROAD USE TAX 50,000 50,000
TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 90,000 90.000
Receipts Total: 300, 000 300. 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 300,000 300,000
Expense Total 300, 000 300, 000
97 SEWER REV BOND CONTROL transfers to fund sewer projects listed in "Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Detail"
' ~ for receipt~ 5297. - Bond
4511 INT. ON INVESTMENTS 279,869 279,869
Receipts Total: 279, 869 279, 869
8164 OTHER PROF. SERVICES 2,000 2,000
9590 MISC. TRANSFERS 3.665,575 3,665,575
Expense Total 3, 667, 575 3, 667, 575
4711 SALE OF BONDS 7.000,000 7,000,000
Receipts Total: 7, 000, 000 7, 000, 000
8111 FINANCIAL SERV & CHG 163.330 163,330
9590 MISC. TRANSFERS 6.882.732 6,882.732
Expense Total 7,046,062 7,046,062
99 WATER REV BOND CONTROL - Bond proceeds fund water projects listed in "Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Deta~" I
'~ lfor receipffl 5398 plus bond issuance costs. to
4711 SALE OF BONDS 9.200.000 9.200,000
Receipts Total: 9.200,000 9,200,000
8183 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 170,553 170,553
9590 MISC. TRANSFERS 9,029.447 9,029.447
Expense Total 9,200,000 9,200,000
~ ~AIRPORT CORPORA TE HANGAR - New Corporate Hangar. Funded from internal loan and repaid by the corporate sponsor.
5900 INTERFUND LOANS 750,000 750,000
Receipts Total: 750,000 750, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 750,000 750,000
Expense Total 750, 000 750, 000
AIRPORT NORTH COMMERCIAL PARK - Development of this commercial park would include water, sanitary and storm
Jstorm water detention area, and a new road. sewer, a
5120 ROAD USE TAX 200,000 200,000
5171 GEN FUND-NON OP ADM. 75,000 75.000
Receipts Total: 75,000 200,000 275,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 75,000 200,000 275,000
Expense Total 75.000 200,000 275,000
- - - 161 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
~ IAIRPORT SE T-HANGAR - Construction of additional T-Hangar funded by internal loan to be repaid with Airport revenues.
5900 INTERFUND LOANS 368,000 368,000
Receipts Total: 368, 000 368, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 368,000 368,000
Expense Total 368, 000 368, 000
AIRPORT TERMINAL - This project would renovate the 1950's airport terminal, including development of the upper level
Fblfor community meeting space. existing
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 700,000 700,000
5900 INTERFUND LOANS 92,000 92,000
Receipts Total: 92, 000 700, 000 792, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 92,000 700,000 792,000
Expense Total 92, 000 700, 000 792, 000
F~ IAIRPORT UNDERGROUND TANK REPLACEMENT - Replace 50 + year old underground tanks.
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 345,000 345,000
Receipts Total: 345, 000 345, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 345,000 345.000
Expense Total 345,000 345. 000
~ iANIMAL SHELTER CAT RUN - Construction of outdoor cat run at Animal Control Faci~ty.
4372 CONTRACTED SERVICES 4.960 4,960
5179 GEN FUND-OTHER 7,040 7,040
5190 MISCELLANEOUS TRANS 15.000 15,000
Receipts Total: 27.000 27.000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 27.000 27.000
Expense Total 27,000 27,000
~ iANIMAL SHEL TER-WEST WING - Landscaping at Animal Control Facility / FY99.
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 17.028 17,028
Receipts Total: 17, 028 17, 028
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 17,028 17,028
Expense Total 17, 028 ~ 7. 028
4511 INT. ON INVESTMENTS 23,000 23,000
Receipts Total: 23.000 23,000
9590 MISC. TRANSFERS 855,123 855,123
Expense Total 855, 123 855, 123
~ IAPR 9a S.O. BOND ISSUE - Bond t~nsfers to fund sewer projects listed in 'Projects by Funding Source - Receipts Deta~" for
receipffi 5198.
4511 INT. ON INVESTMENTS 210.000
Receipts Total: 210,000
9590
MISC. TRANSFERS 6.211,395
Expense Total 6,211,395
210,000
210,000
6,211,395
6,211,395
,162 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
~ JART - Annual a~ocation for Art.
4684 MISCELLANEOUS OTHER 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 400,000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 100,000 100,000
Receipts Total: 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 500, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100,000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100,000 500.000
Expense Total 100.000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 100, 000 500, 000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 400,000 400,000
9220
Receipts Total: 400,000 400, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 400.000 400,000
Expense Total 400,000 400,000
BENTON ST (NED ASHTON) PARK - Develop a small riverfront park just north of the Benton Street Bridge. This would also
IbA;ch;~: part of the proposed Iowa river corridor Trail System, and would be the location for an appropriate memorial to Ned
5176 GEN FUND-PRKLND ACQ. 30,295 30.295
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 32.056 32,056
Receipts Total: 62,351 62,351
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 62.351 62,351
Expense Total 62,351 62,351
5120 ROAD USE TAX 4,323
*-- Receipts Total: 4,323
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 4.323
Expense Total 4.323
Fj~ IBIENNIAL ASPHAL T/CHIP SEAL - Biannual maintenance of selected streets involving resurfacing and chip seal.
395,000 606,000 50,000 220,000 50,000
200,000
4,323
4.323
4,323
4,323
820.000 50,000 2,121,000
820,000 50,000 2,121,000
the bHck streets and provide a morelevelsurfacefor
5120 ROAD USE TAX 1,321,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 200,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 600,000 600,000
Receipts Total: 395, 000 806, 000 50, 000 820, 000 50, 000 2, 121,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 395,000 806,000 50,000
Expense Total 395,000 806,000 50,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 60,000 165,000 225,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 100,000 100.000
Receipts Total: 160,000 165,000 325.000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 160,000 165,000 325,000
Expense Total 160,000 165,000 325,000
- 163-
Activity
5120
5201
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
I BIENNIAL P.C.C. MAINTENANCE - This program contracts for the maintenance of concrete streets on an every other year basis.
9220
ROAD USE TAX
TRANSFER IN - 01 GO
Receipts Total:
CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
BROOKSIDE DRIVE BRIDGE
ROAD USE TAX
Receipts Total:
CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
5120
100.000 220.000 320,000
100,000 100.000
200,000 220,000 424000
200.000 220,000 420,000
20~000 220,000 424000
(1.967) (1.967)
(1,967) (1,967)
9220 (1.967) (1,967)
(1,967) (1,967)
BURL ST BRIDGE/RALSTON CREEK - This project will replace the bridge over Ralston Creek near the Recreation Center. The new
~ F,r~g; ",J"::~:c~;."~;;,~';~o ,:~;..?.d S' s,dewa,,s. ,DOT w,,, cost sh.re ,n th,s p,oject. The project a,so ,.vo,ves Coa, Tar ,ss.es
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 400,000 400,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 300.000 300,000
Receipts Total: 700.000 700,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 700,000 700,000
Expense Total 700.000 700,000
Fj~ [BURLINGTON/GOVERNOR SIGNALS - Costs to complete traffic signals, cost of $53,493 prior to FY99.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 6,527 6,527
Receipts Total: 6,527 6,527
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 6.527 6.527
Expense Total 6,527 6,527
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 71,801 71,801
5120 ROAD USE TAX 10,000 10,000
Receipts Total: 81,801 81,801
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 10,000 10.000
Expense Total 10.000 10,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 250,000 250,000
5198 TRANSFER IN - 96 GO 313,711 313,711
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 1,600,000 1.600,000
Receipts Total: 2, 163, 711 2, 163, 711
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 2.163,711 2,163,711
Expense Total 2, 163, 711 2, 163, 711
- 164- '
Activity
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
CAPTAIN IRISH PKVIIY-SCOTT/ROCH. - This project would construct Captain Irish Parkway from its current terminus on ACT
property to the intersection of Scott Blvd. and Rochester Ave. A preferred alignment is being prepared as part of the Northeast
_District Study.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 200,000 200,000
5202 TRANSFER IN o 02 GO 4,800,000 4,800,000
Receipts Total: 5,000,000 5,000,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 5,000,000 5,000,000
Expense Total 5,000,000 5,000,000
CEMETERY BUILDING RENOVA TION/REPAIR - This project entails the replacement of the shop roof and repairs to the
- - ~ lroof over the office plus needed repairs to the exterior brick surface and replacement of selected doors and windows. existing t~le
5176 GEN FUND-PRKLND ACQ. 50,000 50,000
Receipts Total: 50.000 50,000
' 9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 50,000 50.000
Expense Total 50, 000 50, 000
Cemetery immediately to the east of the existing cemetery on cemetery land which has been utilized as part of Hickory Hill Park
25,000 25,000
5171 GEN FUND-NON OP ADM.
5200 TRANSFER IN - O0 GO 350.000 350,000
Receipts Total: 25, 000 350, 000 375, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 25,000 350,000 375,000
Expense Total 25,000 350,000 375,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 150.000 150,000
Receipts Total: 150, 000 150, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 150,000 150,000
Expense Total 150,000 150. 000
~ ~ CITY PARK STAGE - RIVERSIDE THEATER - Construct outdoor theater stage and seating in City Park.
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 120,000 120,000
Receipts Total: 120, 000 120, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 120,000 120,000
Expense Total 120, 000 ? 20, 000
5171 GEN FUND-NON OP ADM. 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50.000 250,000
Receipts Total: 50, 000 50, 000 50, 000 50, 000 50, 000 250, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
Expense Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
- - 165 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002
CIVIC CENTER - ROOF PROJECTS * This is a continuation of the roof replacement project.
J lobby, Police Dept. Records, Fire Dept. Training Room and Civic Center East.
2003 Totals
The areas to be reroofed include the
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 4.261 4,261
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 180,000 180,000
Receipts Total: 4, 261 180, 000 184, 261
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 4,261 180,000 184,261
Expense Total 4,261 180,000 184,261
5179
922O
GEN FUND-OTHER 18.000 18.000
Receipts Total .' 18,000 18,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 18,000 18.000
Expense Total 18,000 18,000
ICIVIC CENTER NORTH 3RD FLOOR - Third floor addition plus renovation to existing offices, Clerk, Human Resource, HIS, Public
Works, and Planning.
4684 MISCELLANEOUS OTHER 696,000 696,000
5171 GEN FUND-NON OP ADM. 154,000 154,000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 700,000 700.000
Receipts Total: 1,550,000 1,550,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,550,000 1,550,000
Expense Total 1,550,000 1,550,000
5201
9220
iCIVIC CENTER-HVAC - This project consists ofreplaceing all worn out and inefficient heating and cooling equipment dated 1981
or before.
TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 200,000 200,000
Receipts Total: 200,000 200,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 200,000 200,000
Expense Total 200,000 200,000
F jT~ I COLLECTOR WELLS - L. T. - This project provides for the construction of the above ground structure (house), pumps piping and
controls for the four collector wells.
5399 00 WATER TRANSFERS 1,670,000 1,870.000
Receipts Total: 1,670, 000 1,670, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1.670,000 1,670,000
Expense Total 1,670,000 1,670.000
5399 00 WATER TRANSFERS 1,900,000 1,900,000
Receipts Total: 1,900, 000 1,900, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,900,000 1,900,000
Expense Total 1,900,000 1,900,000
- 166 - '
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity
5197
5398
9220
5197
9220
4431
5190
9220
9341
9342
9346
9351
5300
9220
5120
5198
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
ICOLLECTOR WELLS-LOWER TERMINUS - This project provides for the construction of the above ground structure (house),
pumps piping and controls for the four collector wells.
TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 748,088
99 WATER TRANSFERS 715,000
Receipts Total: 1,463, 088
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1.463,088
Expense Total 1,463,088
748,088
715.000
1,463,088
1,463.088
1,463,088
COLLEGE STREET MAIN - Replace an old water main in the College Street Pedestrian Mall between Clinton Street and the Library.
TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 200,000
Receipts Total: 200, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 200,000
Expense Total 200, 000
J COPS GRANT - Grant to purchase software and computers for the Police department.
FEDERAL GRANTS 366.510
MISCELLANEOUS TRANS 122.546 164.000
Receipts Total: 489,056 164,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 164,000
MINI-COMPUTER 105.000
MICRO-COMPUTER 109,556
OTHER EDP HARDWARE 95,000
MINI-COMPUTER 179,500
Expense Total 489,056 164,000
200.000
20~000
200,000
200,000
I
366,510
286,546
653,056
164,000
105,000
109,556
95,000
179,500
653,056
COURT HILL TRUNK SEWER - This project will upgrade the sanitary sewer along branch of Ralston Creek from Court I
Hill Park to Scoff Park to facilitate development east of Scott Blvd. the south
01 SEWER TRANSFERS 800.000 800,000
Receipts Total: 800, 000 800, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 800,000 800,000
Expense Total 800,000 800,000
ROAD USE TAX 37,673
TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 597.944
Receipts Total: 635. 617
15,000 15,000 15,000
15,000 15,000 1~000
15,000 15,000 15,000
15,000 1~000 15,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 635.617
Expense Total 635, 6 f 7
~ ICREEK-DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE- Annual creek maintenance.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 15,000
Receipts Total: 15, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 15,000
Expense Total 15,000
37,673
597,944
835.617
635,617
635,617
I
60,000
60,000
60,000
60,000
- 167 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
~ ICURB RAMPS o A.D.A. - Reconstruction of curb ramps throughout the City for comp~ance with the American Disabilities Act.
301,104 250,000 100,000 651,104
5120 ROAD USE TAX
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 150.000 150.000
Receipts Total: 301, 104 250, 000 250, 000 801, 104
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 301.104 250.000 250,000 801,104
Expense Total 301, 104 250, 000 250, 000 801, 104
4431
5120
5203
9220
DODGE STREET PAVING - This is a capacity related improvement identified by the Arterial Street Plan. Right-of-way constraints
exist throughout much of this project. This project will be on Dodge Street between Hy-Vee, Governor/Dodge to Prairie Du Chien
Road. It will include traffic signals at the intersection of Dodge Street and Prairie du Chien Road.
FEDERAL GRANTS 900.000 900,000
ROAD USE TAX 100.000 100,000
TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 600,000 600,000
Receipts Total: 1,600,000 1,600,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,600,000 1,600,000
Expense Total 1,600, 000 1,600, 000
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE - Complete renovation of the Downtown Streetscape. FY 2001 includes the continuation of the
downtown and Iowa Avenue type streetscape improvements. This includes both sides of Gilbert-iowa Avenue to Burlington, north
side of Burlington-Gilbert to Capitol, bith sides of Capitol-Burlington to Washington, the south side of Washington -Capitol to
Clinton and both sides of the 400 block of Washington SL
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 403.187 403,187
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 1,220,000 1,220,000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 1,710,000 1,710,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 1.700,000 1.700.000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 1,000,000 1,000.000
Receipts Total: 3,333, 187 1,700,000 1,000,000 6,033, 187
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 3,333,187 1,700,000 1,000,000 6,033,187
Expense Total 3, 333, 187 1,700, 000 1.000, 000 6,033, 187
DUBUQUE ST ELEVATION - This project will elevate the north bound lane of Dubuque Street between Taft Speedway and Foster
{not prevent Dubuque Street from flooding as it did in 1993.
Road. This project will eliminate the frequent flooding of the north bound lanes caused by locally heavy rains. This project will
5120 ROAD USE TAX 60,000 60,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 300,000 300,000
Receipts Total: 360,000 360,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 360,000 360.000
Expense Total 360, 000 360, 000
~ IENT. TO CITY-BEAUTIFICATION - Cost to add signs at all entrances to Iowa City.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 60,000 30,000 30.000
Receipts Total: 60, 000 30, 000 30. 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 60,000 30,000 30,000
Expense Total 60.000 30,000 30,000
30,000 30,000 180,000
30,000 30,000 184000
30.000 30,000 180,000
34000 30,000 18~000
- 168 - '
Capital Improvement Projects
~ Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
~ ~ EPA STORMWA TER MANAGEMENT - This is only the cost of applying for a permit. New EPA requirements that will regulate
storm water runoff in Iowa City and other similarly sized communities are expected to be issued in March of 1999. Compliance
with the new regulations may be required as soon as 2002. The cost of compliance cannot be estimated at this time.
~. 5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 500,000 500,000
Receipts Total: 500,000 500,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 500,000 500,000
~- Expense Total 500.000 500, 000
-- 5120 ROAD USE TAX 29,993 29.993
Receipts Total: 29, 993 29, 993
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 29,993 29,993
" Expense Total 29,993 29,993
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 160,000 160.000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 40,000 40.000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 120,000 120,000
-- Receipts Total: 320, 000 320. 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 320.000 320,000
Expense Total 320,000 320,000
Fj~q lFIRE APPARATUS - Pumpers-2000,2002,2011,2012,2015 ; Aerial Ladder-2008,$1.2 million.
5200 300,000
5202
TRANSFER IN - 00 GO
TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
Receipts Total: 300,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 300.000
9315 FIRE TRUCK(S)
Expense Total 300, 000
350,000
350,000
350,000
350,000
4684
5203
9220
MISCELLANEOUS OTHER 300,000
TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 700,000
Receipts Total: 1,000, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,000,000
Expense Total 1,000,000
300,000
350.000
654000
300,000
350,000
654000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 24,344 100,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 1,400,000
Receipts Total: 24,344 1,500,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 24,344 1,500,000
Expense Total 24,344 1,500,000
oflowa City. Recent
300,000
700,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
CapBin Irish
124.344
1,400,000
1,524,344
1,524,344
1,524,344
169 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING - Amendments of existing maps and expansion of area covered to the Rood Insurance Rate Maps, used
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 15,576 15,576
Receipts Total: 15,576 15,576
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 15,576 15,576
Expense Total 15,576 15,576
Fj~3 JFOOTBRIDGE REPLACEMENT - Annual maintenance of footbridges in the park.
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS 10.000 10.000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 10.000 10,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 10,000 10,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 10.000 10.000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 10.000 10,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 10.000 10,000
Receipts Total: 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 20,000 10,000 10.000 10,000 10,000 60,000
Expense Total 20,000 10,000 10.000 10,000 10,000 60,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 75.000 75,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 375,000 375.000
5401 02 WATER TRANSFERS 300,000 300.000
Receipts Total: 750, 000 750, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 750,000 750,000
Expense Total 750, 000 750, 000
r~ I,~?,o,~,,:~ .,%.,,~o:, ~,?..~,~,%~..~ ;,~,",'; ,~;::L"",' ~'::;'o~""~'2'''~ ~' ,o .~...,.,~.~..,~ ,~o~,~.., ~..,~.~.,~ ~,o,~
145.800 400.000 ~5,800
5120 ROAD USE TAX
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 1,980,000 1,980,000
Receipts Total: 145,800 2,380,000 2,525,800
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 145,800 2,380,000 2,525,800
Expense Total 145,800 2,380,000 2,525,800
5120 ROAD USE TAX 100,000 100,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 950,000 950,000
Receipts Total: 1,050, 000 1,050, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,050,000 1,050,000
Expense Total 1,050.000 1,050, 000
- 170- ~
Activity Project Name
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 146,425
5187 TRANSIT FUND 39,623
Receipts Total: 186,048
9329 OTHER OPER. EQUIP. 52.298
9333 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 20,500
9346 OTHER EDP HARDWARE 113,250
Expense Total 186,048
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
Purchase of fare data system, fareboxes and safe. Grant proceeds will cover 80% of the
~ IFY 98 CELL CONSTRUCTION - Construction of new landfill ce~ at the landfill.
5185 SANITATION-LANDFILL 497.027
Receipts Total: 497,027
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 497.027
Expense Total 497,027
~ ~FY96 RRE PUMPER - FY99: Replace 1977 Mini Pureper.
5190 MISCELLANEOUS TRANS 260,000
Receipts Total: 260,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 260.000
Expense Total 260.000
146,425
39,623
186,048
52,298
20,500
113,250
186048
497,027
49Z027
497,027
49~027
I
260,000
264000
260,000
264000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 136,500
Receipts Total: 136,500
6110 PERM. FULL TIME 22,700
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 113.800
Expense Total 136,500
50.000 50,000 50.000 50.000
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
50,000 50,000 50,000
50, 000 50, 000 50, 000
lines of~
336,500
336500
22,700
50,000 313,800
54000 336500
5120 ROAD USE TAX 76,020
Receipts Total: 76020
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 76,020
Expense Total 76,020
Fj~j'~ l GILBERT ST IAIS UNDERPASS - This project relocates the Gilbert St. underpass at the IAI5 Railroad.
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 17,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 50.000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 183,000
Receipts Total: 250,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 250,000
Expense Total 250,000
76,020
76,020
76,020
76,020
I
17,000
50,000
183,000
254000
250,000
254000
- 171 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity
5201
5202
5203
9220
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 100,000 100,000
TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 600,000 600,000
TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 300,000 300,000
Receipts Total: 100, 000 600, 000 . 300, 000 1.000, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100,000 600,000 300,000 1,000,000
Expense Total 100,000 600,000 300,000 1,000,000
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO Receipts Total:
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. Expense Total
IH.l.,. COM UTER U GRAOE
5179 GEN FUND-OTHER 60,000
5900 INTERFUND LOANS 112,725
Receipts Total: 172, 725
8826 I.S.-DEV. SERV. FEES 76,640
9342 MICRO-COMPUTER 35,500
9352 MICRO-COMPUTER 60,585
Expense Total 172, 725
GROUND STORAGE RESERVOIR - Renovation of pumps, motors, piping and controls at the three 2-million gallon ground storage
~distribution system. Total costs including prior to FY99 total $767,456.
reservoir/booster stations. This project will improve the City's ability to control pressure and flow throughout the water
4,169 4,169
4, 169 4, 169
4.169 4,169
4, 169 4, 169
5185 SANITATION-LANDFILL 620,000
Receipts Total: 620,000
8163 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 125,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 495,000
Expense Total 620,000
60,000
112,725
172,725
76,640
35,500
60,585
172,725
HAZARDOUS RECYCLING FAC - This will provide a permanent facility to accept recyclables and disposal of hazardous
' ' Jmaterials. WASTE
620,000
620,000
125,000
495,000
62~000
HICKORY HILLS TRAIL DEV - This project provides for the design and construction of a revamped and extended trail system
~crushed limestone with a small portion possibly hard- surfaced to accommodate disabled individuals.
throughout Hickory Hill Park. A portion of the trail will be accessible to persons with disabilities. The surface will likely be a
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS 44,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 150,000
Receipts Total .' 44,000 150,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 44,000 150,000
Expense Total 44,000 150,000
~ JHOSPICE MEMORIAL - Create trail side rest area / memorial by Willow Creek Trail with gift and City funds.
5190 MISCELLANEOUS TRANS 8,000
Receipts Total: 8, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 8,000
Expense Total 8,000
44,000
150,000
194,000
194,000
194,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
8,000
- 172 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
~ IHUNTERS RUN PARK DEVELOPMENT - Develop approximately 26 acres of land into a park to better serve the neighborhood.
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 300,000 300,000
Receipts Total: 300,000 300.000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 300.000
Expense Total 300,000
~ I HW'( 1/SUNSET - RIGHT TURN - Construct a right turn lane for westbound traffic on Highway I turning north onto Sunset
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 43.900
5120 ROAD USE TAX 24,460
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 31,100
Receipts Total: 99,460
9220
300,000
304000
StreeL
43,900
24,460
31,100
99,460
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 99,460 99,460
Expense Total 99,460 99,460
crossing and provide a pedestrian/bike trail from Gilbert Street to Sycamore Street along with associated landscaping
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 946,000 946,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 100,000 100,000 100,000 50,000 350,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 400,000 400,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 400,000 400,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 450,000 450,000
Receipts Total: 100,000 1,446,000 500,000 500,000 2,546,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100,000 1,446,000 500,000 500,000 2,546,000
Expense Total 100,000 1,446,000 500,000 500,000 2,546,000
~ JHWY 6/1ST AVE - LEFT TURN - Extension of the left turn bay for eastbound traffic on Highway 6 turning north onto First Avenue.
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 48,300 48,300
5120 ROAD USE TAX 24,625 24.625
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 26,700 26,700
Receipts Total: 99,625 99,625
99,625
99. 625
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 99,625
.... Expense Total 99, 625
~ IIA RIVER POWER DAM IMPR.- Costs to renovate the dam. Related to be new Water Plant.
__ 5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 83,869 83,869
5398 99 WATER TRANSFERS 485,685 485,685
Receil~ts Total: 569. 554 569, 554
-- 9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 569,554 569,554
Expense Total 569,554 569,554
~lA RIVER TRAIL-BURUNAPOLEON - 2.4 Mile PCC and ACC trail, retaining walls; pedestrian bridges, and storm sewer; part of the
regional trail system. EsL construction cost is $1.8 million ($750,000 Fed STP; $1,050,000 RUT). 4/7/98 Agenda
4410 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 67,000 67.000
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 750,000 750.000
. _ 5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 694,374 694.374
Receipts Total: 1,511,374 1,511,374
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,51 1,374 1,511.374
~ Expense Total 1,511,374 1.511,374
- 173-
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
Fj~ ~INTRA-CITY BIKE TRAILS o Annual appropriation of $30,000 for use in various bike trail projects throughout the city.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 20,000 30,000 30,000 80,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 30,000 30,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 30.000 30,000
Receipts Total: 20, 000 30, 000 30, 000 30, 000 30, 000 140, 000
9220
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 20,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 140,000
Expense Total 20,000 30.000 30.000 30.000 30,000 140,000
}
IOWA AVENUE PARKING RAMP - Costs associated with building a new parking faci~ty on the South side of Iowa Avenue between
· Linn St and Gilbert SL
4681 CONTRIB. &DONATIONS 1,500,000 1,500,000
4711 SALE OF BONDS 9,500,000 9,500,000
5181 PARKING FUND 1,800,000 1,800,000
Receipts Total: 12,800,000 12,800,000
8163 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 800,000 800,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 11,200,000 11,200,000
9590 MISC. TRANSFERS 800,000 800,000
Expense Total 12,800,000 12.800.000
5300
9220
WA AVENUE SAN~TARY SEWER~ This pr~jectwi~ rep~ace a brick sewer in the1~ b~ck ~f i~wa Avenue that has a hist~ry ~f
maintenance problems.
01 SEWER TRANSFERS 100,000 100,000
Rece~ToMl: 100,000 100,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100.000 100,000
Expense Total 10~000 100,000
IOWA AVENUE STREETSCAPE - This project provides for the reconstruction of the Iowa Avenue Streetscape between Clinton
Street and Dubuque Street. Sidewalks and street amenities will be improved. There is a reduction of approximately 170 on s~reet
parking spaces· The University has indicated that they will participate in the funding of this project, which has been projected in
FY 2002.
4410 LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 1.000,000 1,000.000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 26,673 200,000 200.000 426.673
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 139,785 139,785
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 100,000 100,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 1.300,000 1,300.000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 500.000 500,000
Receipts Total: 266.458 1,500,000 1,700,000 3,466,458
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 266,458 1,500,000 1.700.000 3.466.458
Expense Total 266,458 1,500,000 1,700,000 3,466,458
KIWANIS PARK - Develop the 14 acre parcel of property donated by the Dane family. The Cae and Penny Bryn
~Associations and the Iowa City Kiwanis Clubs have been involved in development plans. Ty'n Neighborhood
5120 ROAD USE TAX 10,000 10,000
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS 30,000 30,000
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 161,493 161,493
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 39,660 39,660
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 25,000 25,000
Receipts Total: 266, 153 266, 153
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 266,153 266,153
Expense Total 266. 153 266, 153
- 174 -
Activity
5120
5203
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
L MUSCA TINE-DEFOREST/SPRUCE - This project w~l reconstruct Lower Muscatine Rd from Spruce to will include a ~
i left turn lane at the intersection with Sycamore and improved storm sewer. DeForest and
9220
5185
ROAD USE TAX 100.000 100,000
TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 600,000 600,000
Receipts Total: 700, 000 700, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 700.000 700,000
Expense Total 700, 000 700, 000
ILANDFILL AIR QUALITY PERMITTING
SANITATION-LANDFILL 500,000
Receipts Total: 500, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 500,000
Expense Total 500,000
500,000
500,000
9220 500,000
500,000
LANDFILL CELL-FY2003-This project which isincludedinthe Land~llMasterPlan willbe the fou~h ce~ on the westhalfofthe
5185 SANITATION-LANDFILL
Receipts Total:
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
~ [LEACHA TE MONITORING - Ongoing costs to monitor leachate within the landfill.
5185 SANITATION-LANDFILL 69.183
Receipts Total: 69, 183
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 69,183
Expense Total 69, 183
2,800.000 2.800.000
2,804000 2,800,000
2,800,000 2.800.000
2,804000 2,800,000
69,183
69,183
69.183
69,183
~7~ ILEISURE POOL DEVELOPMENT - Retrofit City Park pool into a 'leisure pool' facfiity ( water sfide, spray fountains, play area, etc.)
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 250,000 250,000
Receipts Total: 250, 000 250, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 250,000 250,000
Expense Total 250.000 250, 000
lu. RA.Y coMPuTER REPu, cEMENT
5190 MISCELLANEOUS TRANS 150,000 150,000
5199 TRANSFER IN- 99 GO 370,000 370,000
Receipts Total: 520,000 520.000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 580,000 580,000
Expense Total 580,000 580,000
LIBRARY EXPANSION - renovate and expand the public library. Costs to include a community events center. Subject
'~1 voter approval. Cost to
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 22,500,000 22,500,000
Receipts Total: 22, 500, 000 22, 500, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 22,500,000 22,500,000
Expense Total 22,500.000 22,500,000
- 175-
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
Activity Project Name
ICN ROOM
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 76,000
Receipts Total: 76, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 76,000
Expense Total 76,000
~ ILIBRARY-ROOF, HVAC, CARPET- Cost to
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 169
Receipts Total: 169
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 169
Expense Total f 69
replace the HVAC and carpet in the existing Library.
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 196,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 50,000
Receipts Total: 246, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 246,000
Expense Total 246, 000
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 2,176,898 2,366,065
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 300,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 262,896
Receipts Total: 2,476,898 2,628,961
9100 RIGHT-OF-WAY 3,548,500
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 2,628,961
Expense Total 3,548,500 2,628,961
76,000
76, 000
76,000
76, 000
169
169
169
169
196,000
50,000
246,000
246,000
246000
These are
4,542,963
300,000
262,896
5,105,859
3,548,500
2,628,961
6,17~461
~ iMEADOW STREET BRIDGE - This project will replace the bridge over Ralston Creek at Meadow StreeL
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 160,000 160,000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 40,000 40,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 150,000 150,000
Receipts Total: 350, 000 350, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 350,000 350,000
Expense Total 350.000 350.000
MELROSE AVENUE - This project involves the removal and replacement of the existing Melrose Avenue pavement between
5120 ROAD USE T~ 21,741 21,741
Receipts Total: 21,741 21,741
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 21,741 21,741
Expense Total 21,741 21,741
- 176- '
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
MELROSE AVENUE BRIDGE o Reconstruction of Melrose Ave. Bridge, which spans over the Iowa Interstate Railroad, and the
F~ ~F~;~.se Ave. pavement from Olive Court to just east of Hawkins Drive. Total project cost is $2.561,596 including costs prior to
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 10,000
4652 REIMB OF EXPENSES 71,523
5120 ROAD USE TAX (38,937)
Receipts Total: 42,586
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 42,586
Expense Total 42,586
F~ IMELROSE MARKET SANITARY SEWER - Sanitary Sewer repairs. Costs prior to FY99 total 10,931.
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 804
5298 99 SEWER TRANSFERS 46,062
Receipts Total: 46,866
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 46,866
Expense Total 46,866
10,000
71.523
(38,937)
42, 586
42,586
42, 586
I
804
46,062
46,866
46,866
46,866
MERCER PARK BALL FIELD LIGHTING - This project involves the removal replacement and upgreding of the fighting
l Mercer Park Diamonds #1, #2 and #3. Improvements will better accommodate baseball as opposed to softball. system on
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 200,000 200,000
Receipts Total: 200, 000 200, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 200,000 200,000
Expense Total 200, 000 200, 000
MONTGOMERY/BUTLER HOUSE - The Montgomery - Butler house is an 1850's era structure purchased by the City as part of the
~ ~;:;p,.:~:;. ,;:~,t%~ ,,~,~,~y prope,~. The proj. c, ,.vo,v.d s.c.r,.,, ..d steb,fi.,.g ,he str. c,ur. ,or ,u,ure reh.b,,,,.,,on,
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 24,173 24,173
Receipts Total: 24. '/73 24, 173
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 24,173 24,173
Expense Total 24. 173 24, 173
MORMON TREK-ABBEY LANE/HWY 1 - This project reconstructs Mormon betwen Hwy 1 and Abbey Lane from two lane
}to four lane and includes turning lanes at the major intersections. Trek Blvd
5120 ROAD USE TAX 100.000 100,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 2,400,000 2,400,000
Receipts Total: 2,500, 000 2,500, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 2,500,000 2,500,000
Expense Total 2,500,000 2,500,000
9220
,-.-,.-,,...,.....,,,-... ,.....,..,,: ,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,.,,,..,,,.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 12.000 12,000
Receipts Total: 12, 000 12, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 12,000 12,000
Expense Total 12, 000 12, 000
- 177 -
Activity
5120
5203
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Tota Is
IMORMON TREK-R/R OVERPASS - This project reconstructs the IAIS railroad overpass on Mormon trek Blvd to accommodate the
proposed four-lane street. The railroad wi~ remain in operation during construction.
ROAD USE TAX 150.000
TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 1,250,000
Receipts Total: 1.400, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1.400,000
Expense Total 1,400,000
MORMON TREK/ABBEY LANE STORM SEWER - This project wi~ investigate ways to reduce stormwater
I Trek Blvd and Abbey Lane and reduce erosion problems to the T'yn Cae stormwater management basin. flooding along Mormon
5120
5200
150.000
1,250,000
1,400, 000
1,400.000
1,400, 000
ROAD USE TAX 75,000 75,000
TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 175,000 175,000
Receipts Total: 250, 000 250, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 250,000 250.000
Expense Total 250, 000 250. 000
~ [MORMON TREK/ROHRET ROAD - Signalization of intersection, total cost of $52,597 including costs prior to FY99.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 18,060
Receipts Total: 18,060
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 18,060
Expense Total 18,060
18,060
18,060
18,060
18,060
.,.,-,..,.,,.,,.,,..,,.. ,.. ,,.. ,,....., ,,,.,. ,.,..,..,-.,,.,.,, ,,..,..,,,,,.,.,.,,.,.
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 100,000 100,000
Receipts Total: 100,000 100,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100,000 100,000
Expense Total 100,000 100,000
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 29,103 29,103
Receipts Total: 29, 103 29, 103
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 29, 103 29.103
Expense Total 29, 103 29, 103
NAPOLEON PARK LIFT STATION - Construction of Napoleon Park Pump Station, minor improvements at the N. Wastewater
Jtreatment plants. Costs prior to FY99 total 5,985,637.
Treatment Plant; new bar screens at the North and South Plant pump stations; and fiber optic lines between the two waterwater
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 43,226 43,226
Receipts Total: 43,226 43,226
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 43.226 43,226
Expense Total 43,226 43,226
- 178-
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO
Receipts Total:
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 277,664
Expense Total 277,664
rj~7~ INE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT-
4664 MISCELLANEOUS OTHER
Receipts Total:
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 750,000
Expense Total 750,000
NAPOLEON PARK SOFTBALL FIELDS - Renovate the existing facility, transforming it into an eight-field youth softba~ complex,
designed to girls' softbafi standards. It would include a~ the necessary items for a softball complex, including fencing, backstops,
bleachers, water lines, adequate parking, concession stand, restrooms, etc. The Girls Softball Association will be approached for
a financial contribution.
277,664 277,664
277, 664 277, 664
Costs to develop the land north and east of the airport.
750.000
750, 000
277,664
277, 664
4511 INT. ON INVESTMENTS 121.058
Receipts Total: 121,058
9590 MISC. TRANSFERS 4,385,940
Expense Total 4,385,940
750,000
750,000
750,000
750,000
121,058
121,058
-- 4,385,940
4.385, 940
5176 GEN FUND-PRKLND ACQ. 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50.000
Receipts Total: 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Expense Total 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Fj~ ~ OVRWD TH PA V/EXTRA WD TH SIDWLK- City cost for overwidth paving and extra width sidewalks.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Receipts Total: 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
Expense Total 20,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
I PARK ACCESSIBILITY PROGRAMS - Annual cost to improve the accessibility of the parks.
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS 20,000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 25,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 25,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
Receipts Total: 45,000 25,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 45,000 25,000
Expense Total 45, 000 25, 000
25,000
25,000
2~000 2~000
25,000 25,000
2~000 2~000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
250,000
250,000
250,000
254000
180,000
184000
180,000
184000
20,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
145,000
!45,000
145,000
- 179-
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
PARK RD BRIDGE APPROACH - This project involves the removal and cracked approach pavement
~and the removal and replacement of the bridge expansion joints. replacement of settled and
5120 ROAD USE TAX 28,000 28.000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 272,000 272,000
Receipts Total .' 300, 000 300, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 300,000 300,000
Expense Total 300, 000 300, 000
F ~7~ ~PARK RD/RIVERSIDE-LEFT TURN - This project establishes left turn lanes on all approaches to the intersection. The traffic
carrying capacity of Park Rd is currently constrained due to the absence of dedicated left turn lanes.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 30,000 30,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 200,000 200,000
Receipts Total: 230. 000 230, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 230,000 230,000
Expense Total 230. 000 230, 000
~ ~PARK SHELTER IMPROVEMENTS - Annual cost to improve the park shelters.
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS 13.000 13,000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 10,000 10.000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 10,000 10,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 10,000 10,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 10,000 10,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 10,000 10,000
Re ceipts Total: 23, 000 1 O, 000 1 O, 000 1 O, 000 1 O. 000 63, 0 O0
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 23,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 63,000
Expense Total 23,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 63,000
~ }PARK-PLA YGROUND EQUIPMENT - Annual cost to replace the playground equipment in the parks.
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 100,000 100,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 100,000 100,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 100,000 100,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 100,000 100,000
Receipts Total: 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
Expense Total 100,000 . 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
F~ IPARK.RESTROOM REPLACE/CONSTRUCT- Annual cost to replace/construct restrooms in the parks.
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 40,000 40,000
5201 TRANSFER IN- 01 GO 40,000 40.000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 40,000 40,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 40,000 40,000
Receipts Total: 40, 000 40, 000 40, 000 40, 000 160, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 160,000
Expense Total 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 160,000
- 180 - '
Activity
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT - With the Neighborhood Open Space Plan ordinance completed, neighborhood associations
becoming more active, and the requirement of developers to dedicate land to the City, we need to set aside an annual
appropriation for development of new parks, as the land becomes acquired. Partially funded through the Parkland Development
Fund.
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 25,000 25,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 50,000 50,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 50,000 50,000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 50,000 50.000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 50.000 50.000
Receipts Total: 25.000 50, 000 50, 000 50, 000 50, 000 225. 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 25,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50.000 225,000
Expense Total 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 225,000
5173
5198
8161
9220
5173
5199
5200
5201
5202
5203
9220
5173
5199
5200
5201
5202
5203
922O
PARKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY - The exising maintenance shop at City Park is inadequate for parks and CBD operations. It
l would, upon renovation and expansion, provide room to add Forestry operations.
GEN FUND-PARKS 50.000
TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 700,000
Receipts Total: 750, 000
ARCHITECTURAL SERV. 50.000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 700,000
Expense Total 750,000
I PARKS SIDEWALK REPLA CEMENT- Annual cost to replace the sidewalks in the parks.
5,000
5.000
5.000
5,000
5,000
GEN FUND-PARKS
TRANSFER IN - 99 GO
TRANSFER IN - 00 GO
TRANSFER IN - 01 GO
TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
Receipts Total:
CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
IPARKS-PARKING
GEN FUND-PARKS
TRANSFER IN - 99 GO
TRANSFER IN - 00 GO
TRANSFER IN - 01 GO
TRANSFER IN - 02 GO
TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
Receipts Total:
CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
10,000 ~000 ~000 ~000
10.000 5,000 5,000 5.000
1~000 ~000 ~000 5,000
LOTIMPROVEMENTS-Annualcoststorepairthe parking lotsinthe parks.
5,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15.000
5,000
5,000
5,000
~000
50,000
700,000
750,000
50,000
700,000
750,000
15,000
20,000 15,000 1~000 1~000 1~000
20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
2~000 1~000 15,000 1~000 15,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
30,000
30,000
3~000
5,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
15,000
80,000
80,000
80.000
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
PENINSULA PARK - This project involves the development of the lowere elevation of the peninsula area into a 'natural park", with
~ water supply.
prairie grasses, wildflowers, native woodlands and trails. This type of development will help protect the weftheads for the City's
5176 GEN FUND-PRKLND ACQ. 13,000 13,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 100,000 100,000
Receipts Total: 13,000 100,000 113,000
8163 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 13,000 13.000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100,000 100,000
Expense Total 13,000 100,000 113,000
5171
9220
PENINSULA PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT -
GEN FUND-NON OP ADM. 200,000
Receipts Total: 200,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 200.000
Expense Total 200,000
Cost to market the peninsula for sale to a developer.
200.000
204000
200.000
204000
PENINSULA SITE DEV. - PHASE II - This project will be combined with the Foster Road west of Dubuque improvements and
5398 99 WATER T~NSFERS 1.600.000 1.600,000
Receipts Total: 1.600, 000 1,600, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,600.000
Expense Total 1,600,000
~ IPENINSUL~DUBUQUE RD-PH 3 - Cost ffi cons~uct wa~r main ~om Dubuque Rd. to ~e Peninsula.
5201 TRANSFER IN- 01 GO 247,000
5400 01 WATER TRANSFERS 1,313.000
Receipts Total: 1,560,000
9220 CONTACTED IMPROV. 1,560.000
Ex~nse Total 1,560,000
5182 WASTEWATER TREATMEN
5299 00 SEWER TRANSFERS
5300 01 SEWER TRANSFERS
Receipts Total:
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
~ !POL DISPATCH WINDOW REMODELING
5179 GEN FUND-OTHER 10,520
Receipts Total: 1 O, 520
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 10,520
Expense Total 10,520
1,600.000
1,600,000
Cos~includea ~ail/road.
247,000
1,313,000
1,56~000
1.560.000
1,56~000
3,166,000 1,520,000 4,686,000
4.834.000 4,834,000
7,640.000 7,640,000
8,000,000 9,16~000 1~160,000
8,000,000 9,160,000 17,160.000
8,00~000 ~160.000 ~160,000
10,520
10,520
10,520
10,520
- 182-
Activity
5171
5199
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
~POLICE SECOND FLOOR DESIGN - Cost to finish the second floor of the police departmenL
GEN FUND-NON OP ADM. 44.000 44,000
TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 600,000 600,000
Receipts Total: 644,000 644,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 644,000 644,000
Expense Total 644, 000 644, 000
iPUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX - This complex will replace the existing buildings at 1200 S Riverside Drive to a new site south of the
Airport.
4681
5120
5185
5199
9220
5181
9220
5197
9220
4410
5120
5183
5198
5199
9220
5298
9220
CONTRIB. & DONATIONS 1,380,000 1,380,000
ROAD USE TAX 88,072 88,072
SANITATION-LANDFILL 300,000 300,000
TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 700,000 700,000
Receipts Total: 2,468,072 2,468,072
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 2,468.072 2,468,072
Expense Total 2.468,072 2,468,072
I RAMP MAINTENANCE & REPAIR - Every other year maintenance of parking ramps.
PARKING FUND 317.322 300,000
Receipts Total: 317, 322 300, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 317,322 300.000
Expense Total 317, 322 300, 000
330,000 947,322
330,000 94~322
330,000 947.322
330,000 94~322
RAW WATER MAIN-PHASE 1 - Installation of a raw water pipeline from the existing plant to Foster Road and construction of the
· Jexisting Jordan well and Burge wells to the new plant.
Iowa River Trail from Park Road to Taft Speedway. After the new plant is constructed this line will transport raw water from the
TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 138,114 138,114
Receipts Total: 138, 114 138, 114
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 138,114 138,114
Expense Total 138, 114 138, 114
'RIVER ST PAVING - This project will reconstruct the pavement and provide storm sewer improvements. High annual maintenance
costs are experienced with this street as well as complaints about lack of curbs. This project should be coordinated with the
River Street sanitary sewer.
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 600,000 600,000
ROAD USE TAX 200,000 200.000
WATER FUND 185,000 185,000
TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 1,013,109 1,013,109
TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 550,000 550,000
Receipts Total: 2,548, 109 2,548, 109
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 2,548,109 2.548,109
Expense Total 2,548, 109 2,548, 109
RIVER STREET SEWER- This project will reconstruct the pavement and provide storm sewer improvements. High annual
maintenance costs are experienced with this street as well as complaints about lack of curbs. This project should be coordinated
with the River Street sanitary sewer. River Street sanitary sewer involves the reconstruction of the sanitary sewer on River Street.
99 SEWER TRANSFERS 208,000 208,000
Receipts Total: 208, 000 208, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 208.000 208,000
Expense Total 208, 000 208, 000
- 183 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
RIVERSIDE DRIVE REDEVELOPMENT - This project includes methane abatement. dynamic compaction and fill at the 7 acre site
owned by the City at Riverside Dr. and Hwy 6. This site preparation would a~ow for marketing of this properly for commercial
development.
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 2,000,000
Receipts Total: 2.000,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 2.000,000
Expense Total 2,000,000
ROHRET SOUTH SEWER - This project would extend the 30" sanitary sewer along Abbey Lane west side
P'~'~ ~of Highway 218. This project will allow development within the watershed of Highway 218. from Burry Drive to the
5300 01 SEWER TRANSFERS 800,000 800,000
Receipts Total: 800.000 800,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 800,000 800,000
Expense Total 800. 000 800, 000
F~'~ (RR CROSSINGS-CITY WIDE - City share of costs associated with repairing railroad crossings in Iowa City.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 69,113 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 149,113
Receipts Total: 69, 113 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 149, 113
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 69, 113 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 149, 113
Expense Total 69, 113 20.000 20.000 20,000 20.000 149. 113
'~ {and qua~ty as well as recreation.
2,000,000
2, 000, 000
2,000,000
2, 000, 000
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 200,000 200,000
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 158,531 158,531
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 800.000 800,000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 700.000 700,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 500,000 500,000
Receipts Total: 1.158,531 700, 000 500,000 2,358,531
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,158,531 700,000 500,000 2,358,531
Expense Total 1,158.531 700,000 500,000 2,358,531
5399 00 WATER TRANSFERS 300,000 300,000
Receipts Total: 300, 000 300, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 300,000 300,000
Expense Total 300,000 300,000
~'6~ ~SAND PIT PUMP S TA T/ON - Costs associated with building a sand pit pump station in conjunction with the new water plant.
5399 00 WATER TRANSFERS 650,000 650,000
Receipts Total: 650, 000 650. 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 650,000 650,000
Expense Total 650, 000 650, 000
- 184 -
Activity
5398
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
i SAND PIT PUMP STA TION-L. T. - Costs associated with bu~ding a sand pit pump station in conjunction with the new water plant.
99 WATER TRANSFERS 800,000 800,000
Receipts Total: 800. 000 800, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 800,000 800,000
Expense Total 800, 000 800, 000
ISANDUSKY STORM SEWER - This project will reduce street and yard flooding. Improvements to alleviate street and back yard
flooding north and south of Sandusky Avenue between the intersections with Pepper and Broadway, and along the properties
south of Southgate Ave.
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 8,634 8,634
Receipts Total: 8, 634 8, 634
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 8,634 8,634
Expense Total 8,634 8,634
SCANLON GYMNASIUM - 16,000 Sq Ft addition mercer Park Aquatic Center. Addition includes 2 baskeffia~ courts 3 volleyball I
Icourts and a muftipurpose room. to
4681 CONTRIB. &DONATIONS 255,783 255,783
5176 GEN FUND-PRKLND ACQ. 200,000 200,000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 700,000 700,000
5900 INTERFUND LOANS 501,857 501,857
Receipts Total: 1.657, 640 1,657, 640
8161 ARCHITECTURAL SERV. 22,798 22,798
9210 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 1,584.842 1,584,842
9329 OTHER OPER. EQUIP. 50,000 50,000
Expense Total 1,657, 640 1,657, 640
_ ~ ~ SCOTT BLVD SIDEWALK - This project will construct a sidewalk along the east side of Scott Blvd in front of Scott Park.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 60,000
Receipts Total: 60. 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 60.000
Expense Total 60,000
60.000
60,000
60,000
60,000
SCOTTBLVD TRUNK SEWER - This projectextendsfromthe Heinz tiff sM~on downs~eamtothe SoutheastinterceptoC and
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 118,595 118,595
Receipts Total: I 18, 595 ~ 18, 595
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 118,595 118,595
Expense Total f 18.595 ~ ~ a, 595
5301
9220
SCOTT PARK AREA TRUNK SEWER - The Scott Park sewer will provide sewer service to the approximately 300 acre area
generally bounded by Scott Park on the south, the city limits on the west, Rochester Avenue on the north, and a line one-half mile
east of the city limits on the east. The existing sanitary lagoon serving the care center on Rochester Avenue could be removed
once this sewer is installed.
02 SEWER TRANSFERS 400,000 400,000
Receipts Total: 400, 000 400, 000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 400,000 400,000
Expense Total 400. 000 400, 000
- 185-
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
5173 GEN FUND-PARKS 7,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 250,000
Receipts Total: 7, 000 250, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 7.000 250,000
Expense Total 7, 000 250, 000
SENIOR CENTER - HVAC RENOV - Repair
control problems throughout the building.
and control of the HVAC systems.
5900 INTERFUND LOANS 65,084
Receipts Total: 65,084
9210 BUILDING IMPROVEMENT 45.888
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 19,196
Expense Total 65, 084
7,000
250,000
257, 000
257,000
257, 000
and reconstruction of HVAC system to address uneven heating, cooling and HVAC
Also includes installation of Direct Digital Control (DDC) system for better management
~ { SEWER CONNECTION - N & S PLANT - Design phase of wastewater treatment facility.
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 76.921
Receipts Total: 76, 921
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 76.921
Expense Total 76,921
~ ISEWER MAIN PROJECTS-ANNUAL - Annual costs to replace sewer mains.
5182 WASTEWATER TREATMEN 300.000 300.000 300,000
Receipts Total: 300,000 300,000 300,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 300.000 300,000 300,000
Expense Total 304000 304000 300,000
65,084
65, 084
45,888
19,196
65, 084
76,921
76,921
76,921
76,921
300,000 300.000 1,500,000
304000 304000 1,504000
300,000 300,000 1,500,000
304000 304000 1,500,000
'~ JSHAMROCK/PETERSON STORM SEWER - Construction of rock filled wire mesh baskets for 125-feet around the creek bend at the
Shamrock Drive / Arbor Drive culvert entrance. Also includes debris removal inside the 450-foot long culvert. This work will
stabilize the stream bank at the culvert entrance and improve culvert capacity.
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 17,983
Expense Total 17, 983
~ I SKA TEBOARD PARK - Construct a skateboarding facility in a park relatively close to the downtown area.
5200 TRANSFER IN - O0 GO 100,000
Receipts Total: 104 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100,000
Expense Total 104 000
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 8,433 8,433
Receipts Total: 8,433 8,433
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 8,433 8,433
Expense Total 8,433 8,433
SHERIDAN AVE SANITARY SEWER - Construction of a sanitary sewer along Sheridan Ave. from Oakland Ave. to the trunk sewer
on Rundell StreeL This new sewer will bypass approximately one third of the sewage flows around the Longfellow neighborhood
to control sewer surcharging.
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 17.983 17.983
Receipts Total: 17.983 17,983
17.983
17,983
100,000
104000
100,000
104000
- 186 - '
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
'~ I SNYDER CREEK WATERSHED - Watershed study, within a 3200-acre study area (five square miles), to be funded by EPA grant
with local match of $86,115.
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 258.345 258,345
4681 CONTRIB. &DONATIONS 86,115 86,115
Receipts Total: 344,460 344,460
6110 PERM. FULL TIME 28,436 28,436
6310 FICA 2,175 2,175
6320 IPERS 1,635 1,635
7286 MISC. SUPPLIES 1,484 1,484
8163 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 134,000 134.000
8164 OTHER PROF. SERVICES 50,625 50,625
8167 TESTING SERVICES 31,400 31,400
8319 TRAVEL 7,395 7,395
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 86, 115 86.115
9352 MICRO-COMPUTER 1,195 1,195
Expense Total 344,460 344,460
5120
922O
5299
53O0
9220
ROAD USE TAX 80,000 80,000
Receipts Total: 80,000 80,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 80,000 80,000
Expense Total 80,000 80,000
5,000,000 5,000,000
00 SEWER TRANSFERS
01 SEWER TRANSFERS 5,000,000 5,000,000
Receipts Total: 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,000,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 5,000,000 5,000,000 10,000,000
Expense Total 5, 000, 000 5, 000, 000 1 O, 000, 000
SOUTH RIVER CORRIDOR SEWER - Construction of an interceptor sewer between the South and North Wastewater Treatment
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 78,768 78,768
5298 99 SEWER TRANSFERS 600,000 600,000
Receipts Total: 678, 768 678, 768
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 678,768 678,768
Expense Total 678, 768 678, 768
e SOUTH SITE SOCCER FIELDS - Costs associated with renovating the South Site Soccer field. Including concession stand,
restrooms and playground equipment.
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 138,682
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 400,000
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 300,000
Receipts Total: 838, 682
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 838,682
Expense Total 838, 682
138,682
400,000
300,000
838,682
838,682
838,682
-- - 187 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
SOUTHGA TEA VE. EXTENSION - The Southgate Avenue project consists of the extension of Southgate Avenue from Waterfront
Drive to Gilbert StreeL The work includes 36-foot wide paving, a railroad crossing and related storm sewer. The portion of the
right-of-way west of the railroad property has been dedicated to the City without charge by the developer. This project will
provide improved access to the commercial area between Gilbert Street and Keokuk Street south of Highway 6 and reduce the left
turn congestion at Gilbert and Highway 6.
4652 REIMB OF EXPENSES 3.162 3,162
5120 ROAD USE TAX 510.829 510,829
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 200,000 200,000
Receipts Total: 713,991 713,991
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 713.991 713,991
Expense Total 713,991 713,991
5900
9220
SR CENTER REPAIRS-PHASE II - Instaft fire protection sprinkler system, renovate Washington Street entrance, and replace ceiling
tiles.
INTERFUND LOANS 175.238 175.238
Receipts Total: 175, 238 175, 238
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 175.238 175,238
Expense Total 175, 238 175, 238
STURGIS FERRY PARK DEVELOPMENT- This park was constructed on an old landfill and has been difficult to maintain. The
~entrance to the city. The project will also include a multi-purpose trail to connect into the Iowa River Corridor Trail.
project includes berming and planting, particularly on the north end to screen the recycling area, making a more attractive
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 35.000 35.000
Receipts Total: 35,000 35,000
9220 CONTP. ACTED IMPROV. 35.000 35,000
Expense Total 35,000 35,000
SUMMIT ST BRIDGE REPLACEMENT- Removal and replacement of Summit SL Bridge, which spans over the Iowa Interstate
Railroad. Federal funding will be 80% of construction costs or $850,000 whichever is less, remainder to be funded from Road Use
Tax.
4366 DEV FEE-SDWLKJPAVING 1,080 1,080
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 789,570 789,570
5120 ROAD USE TAX 626.816 626.816
5199 TRANSFER IN - 99 GO 155,000 155,000
Receipts Total: 1.572,466 1,572,466
8166 ENGINEERING SERVICES 208.000 208,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1.364,466 1.364.466
Expense Total 1,572,466 1,572,466
5120 ROAD USE TAX 25,000 25.000 25.000 75,000
5201 TRANSFER IN - 01 GO 25.000 25.000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 25.000 25,000
Receipts Total: 25, 000 25, 000 25, 000 25, 000 25, 000 125, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 25.000 25,000 25.000 25,000 25,000 125,000
Expense Total 25,000 25.000 25,000 25,000 25,000 125,000
- 188 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order o Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
5399 00 WATER TRANSFERS 200,000 200,000
Receipts Total: 200, 000 200, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 200.000 200,000
Expense Total 200, 000 200, 000
5120 ROAD USE TAX 200,000 200,000
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO 1,000.000 1,000,000
Receipts Total: 1,200,000 1,204000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1.200,000 1.200.000
Expense Total 1,200, 000 1,200, 000
~ TENNIS COURT RENOVA TION/LIGHTING - This project involves the resurfacing and relighting of the tennis courts in both City
Park and Mercer Park. It enta~s an ove~ay surface on the courts with color coating and striping. It also includes a complete
renovation of the lighting systems from ground up.
5200
9220
5900
TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 120.000
Receipts Total: 120,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 120,000
Expense Total 124000
· ~ TORNADO WARNING SIRENS - FY99: Cost to add a weather alert siren at the South Wastewater planL
INTERFUND LOANS 17.512
Receipts Total: 17.512
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 17,512
Expense Total 17,512
~ ~ TRAFFIC CALMING - This is an annual program to implement traffic calming strategies where requested and appropriate.
5120 ROAD USE TAX 30,640 25,000 25,000 25,000 25.000
Receipts Total: 30, 640 25, 000 25, 000 25, 000 25, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 30,640 25,000 25,000 25.000 25,000
Expense Total 30,640 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
~ l TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS - Annual appropriation of $50,000 for potential traffic signals.
120,000
120,000
120.000
124000
17,512
19512
17.512
1~512
130,640
134640
130,640
134640
5120 ROAD USE TAX 94,000 120.000 130.000 35,000 140,000 519.000
5202 TRANSFER IN - 02 GO 100.000 100.000
Receipts Total: 94,000 120,000 130.000 135,000 140,000 619,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 94.000 120.000 130.000 135,000 140.000 619,000
Expense Total 94, 000 120, 000 130, 000 135, 000 14 O, 000 619, 0 O0
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 177,066
5187 TRANSIT FUND 34.044
Receipts Total: 211, 110
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 211,110
Expense Total 211, 110
177,066
34,044
211,110
211,110
211,110
189-
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
~ ITRANSIT METHANE PROJECT- This project will instaft a methane venting system underneath the Transit Bu~ding.
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 320,000 320.000
5187 TRANSIT FUND 80,000 80,000
Receipts Total: 400, 000 400, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 400,000 400,000
Expense Total 400, 000 400, 000
~ I TRANSIT PARKING LOT RESURFACE - Costs to resurface the transit parking lot.
4431 FEDERAL GRANTS 120,000 120.000
5187 TRANSIT FUND 30,000 30,000
Receipts Total: 150,000 150,000
9220 C~)NTRACTED IMPROV. 150,000 150,000
Expense Total 150,000 150, 000
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 75,000 75,000
Receipts Total: 75,000 75.000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 75,000 75.000
Expense Total 75, 000 75, 000
~ I WATER FACILITY SITE DEV., PH 1- Costs associated with getting the water plant site ready for the new water plant.
5197 TRANSFER IN ~ 97 GO 2,449,705 2,449,705
5398 99 WATER TRANSFERS 1,725,262 1,725,262
Receipts Total .' 4, 174,967 4, 174,967
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 4,174,967 4.174,967
Expense Total 4, 174,967 4,174,967
1WATER MAIN PENINSULA PH 3A - Costs to construct water mains on the peninsula in conjunction with the water plant site.
5400 01 WATER TRANSFERS 1.600,000
Receipts Total: 1,600,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,600,000
Expense Total 1,600,000
~ ~ WA TER MAIN PROJECTS-ANNUAL - Annual replacement of water mains.
5183 WATER FUND 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000
Receipts Total: 170, 000 170, 000 170, 000 170, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000
Expense Total 170, 000 170, 000 170, 000 170, 000
~ { WATER MAIN, PHASE IlIA - Costs to construct water mains on the peninsula in conjunction with the water plant site.
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 5,637
5398 99 WATER TRANSFERS 1,366,000
Receipts Total: 1,371,637
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,371,637
Expense Total 1,371,637
1,600,000
1,600, 000
1,600,000
1,600, 000
680,000
680,000
680,000
684000
5,637
1,366,000
1,371,637
1,371,637
1,371,637
- 190 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity
5398
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,365,000
Expense Total 1,365,000
Fj~ J WATER MAIN, PHASE IV - Water main work in conjunction with the new water plant.
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
WATER MAIN, PHASE IIIB - This project will be combined with the Foster Road west of Dubuque improvements and includes raw
water main and finish water main from the peninsula to the water plant site and raw water main along Foster Rd. to Dubuque St.
99 WATER TRANSFERS 1,365,000 1.365,000
Receipts Total: 1,365, 000 1,365, 000
1,365,000
1,365,000
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 512,019 512,019
5398 99 WATER TRANSFERS 819,500 819,500
Receipts Total: 1,331,519 1,331,519
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,331.519 1,331,519
Expense Total 1,331,519 1,331,519
1WATER TREATMENT FACILITY - Design phase of water treatment facility.
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 257,574
5398 99 WATER TRANSFERS 153,000
Receipts Total: 410,574
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 410,574
Expense Total 410,574
~ ~ WATER TREATMENT PLANT - This project includes the construction of the new water treatment facility.
5183 WATER FUND 4,000,000 4.000,000
5400 01 WATER TRANSFERS 24,000,000
Receipts Total.' 28,000,000 4,000,000
9220
257,574
153,000
41~574
410,574
41~574
I
8,000,000
24,000,000
32,000,000
CONTRACTED IMPROV. 28,000,000 4,000,000 32,000,000
Expense Total 28, 000, 000 4, 000, 000 32, 000, 000
WATERWORKS PARK - This project involves the development of the City-owned land surrounding the new water treatment plant I
into a 'natural park', with prairie grasses, wildflowers, native tree, etc. It will also accommodate a future portion of the Iowa River
Corridor Trail
12,000 12,000
250,000 250,000
250,000 250,000
12,000 25~000 25~000 51~000
12,000 12,000
250,000 250,000 500,000
1~000 25~000 25~000 51~000
5176 GEN FUND-PRKLND ACQ.
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO
5203 TRANSFER IN - 03 GO
Receipts Total:
8163 MANAGEMENT SERVICES
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO
Receipts Total:
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
(14,515) (14,515)
(14,515) (14,515)
(14,515) (14,515)
(14,515) (14,515)
-- - 191 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
WEST SIDE TRUNK SEWER - This project would improve the capacity of the trunk sewer from West High School to the
'~'~ lwest access at hwy 218 which would a~ow development in this area. west side
5300 01 SEWER TRANSFERS 800.000 800,000
Receipts Total: 800, 000 800, 000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 800.000 800,000
Expense Total 800,000 800,000
5297 97 SEWER TRANSFERS 5,005 5,005
5298 99 SEWER TRANSFERS 420,000 420,000
Receipts Total: 425,005 425,005
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 425,005 425,005
Expense Total 425.005 425,005
5197
5297
5298
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 100,000 100,000
Receipts Total: 100,000 100,000
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100.000 100,000
Expense Total 100,000 100,000
WILLIAMS PIPELINE REL OCA TION- Relocate Willlares Pipeline from
Ipipeline easemenL Total cost of $885,333 including prior to FY99 new water treatment plant site and vacate the existing
TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 1,280 1.280
Receipts Total: 1,280 1,280
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 1,280 1.280
Expense Total 1,280 1,280
9220
97 SEWER TRANSFERS
99 SEWER TRANSFERS
Receipts Total:
CONTRACTED IMPROV.
Expense Total
3.295.170
5,608,670
8,90~840
8,903,840
8,903,840
3,295,170
5.608,670
8,903.840
8,903,840
8,903,840
I WILLOW CREEK TRAIL - This would extend a trail from the terminus of the trail built in 1998 through Willow Creek and Kiwanis
Parks to Willow Creek Drive.
5197 TRANSFER IN - 97 GO 62.660 62,660
5198 TRANSFER IN- 98 GO 62,698 62,698
5200 TRANSFER IN - 00 GO 400,000 400.000
Receipts Total: 125, 358 400, 000 525. 358
6110 PERM. FULLTIME 10,000 10,000
8163 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 15,184 15.184
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 100.174 400,000 500,174
Expense Total 125, 358 400, 000 525, 358
- 192 -
Capital Improvement Projects
Project Summary in Alphabetical Order - Receipts and Expenses
Activity
Project Name 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Totals
WOOLF AVE. BRIDGE RECONSTRUCT. - Removal and replacement of Woolf Avenue bridge spanning Highway 6 and the
CRANDIC Railroad and reconstruction of WooIf Avenue pavement between Newton Road and Bayard Street, along with associated
sidewalk, water main, and storm sewer facilities.
4426 OTHER STATE GRANTS 380,101 380,101
5198 TRANSFER IN - 98 GO 279.890 279,890
Receipts Total: 659, 991 659, 991
9220 CONTRACTED IMPROV. 659,991 659.991
Expense Total 659, 991 659, 991
GRAND TOTAL - RECEIPTS
GRAND TOTAL - EXPENSES
144,485,465 61,147,857 104,673,000 29,130,000 16, B15,000 356,251,322
158.280.072 35.425,961 56,065.000 18,283,000 16,815,000 284,869,033
-- - 193-
Capital Improvement Projects
Unfunded or in Fiscal Year 2004 and Beyond
# Project Name
13RD AVENUE BRIDGE
2 420TH ST NEAR INDUSTRIAL PARK
3 4TH AVENUE BRIDGE
4 6TH AVENUE BRIDGE
5 AIRPORT NORTH COMMERCIAL PARK
6 AMERICAN LEGION-SCOTT TO TAFT
7 BENTON-ORCHARD/OAKNOLL
8 BURLINGTON ST BRIDGE-SOUTH
10 CEMETERY EXPANSION
11 COMPUTER-FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTE
12 COURT HILL TRAIL
13 DUBUQUE/CHURCH LEFT TURN BAYS
14 EAST-WEST PARKWAY
15 FIRE APPARATUS
16 FIRE TRAINING FACILITY
17 FOSTER RD-DBQ/PRAIRIE DU CHIEN
18 FOSTER RD/DUBUQUE INTERSECTION
19 GILBERT/BOWERY INTERSECTION-LEFT LAN
20 HAFOR CIRCLE STORM SEWER
21 HIGHWAY 965 EXTENSION
22 HWY 6 - LAKESIDE TO 420TH
23 IA RIVER TRAIL-PED BRIDGE/RS
24 IOWA AVE BRIDGE REPAIRS
25 IOWA AVENUE CULVERT REPAIRS
26 KEOKUK ST RECONSTRUCTION
27 LANDFILL GAS SYSTEM
28 LAURA DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION
29 MESQUAKIE PARK
30 MORMON TREK-MELROSE/IAIS RR
31 MORMON TREK-R/R TO HWY 6
32 NORTH SIDE STORM SEWER
33 PARKING RAMP - NEAR SOUTHSIDE
34 PRENTISS ST. BRIDGE
35 PUBLIC WORKS COMPLEX
36 RALSTON CREEK TRUNK SEWER-S. BRANCH
37 REC CENTER EXPANSION
38 ROCHESTER AVENUE BRIDGE
39 SCOTT BLVD TRUNK SEWER
40 SCOTT BOULEVARD EXT-PHASE 1
41 SHANNON DRIVE BOX CULVERT
42 SOUTH AREA ARTERIAL
43 SOUTH GILBERT IMPROVEMENTS
44 SUMMIT ST. HISTORIC PLAN
45 SUNSET ST STORM SEWER
46 SYCAMORE-CITY LIMITS TO L
47 SYCAMORE-HWY 6/DEFOREST
48 TAFT SPEEDWAY
49 WEST SIDE LIFT STATION
50 WILLOW CREEK TRAIL
- 194 -
Unfunded Amount
$320,000
$1,200,000
$320,000
$320,000
$1,000,000
$2,100,000
$2,500,000
$800,000
$300,000
$1,000,000
$225,000
$300,000
$3.400,000
$2,820,000
$890,000
$2,200,000
$1,050,000
$420,000
$600,000
$5,000,000
$3,500,000
$1,200 000
$800 000
$300 000
$400 000
$2,300 000
$500 000
$1,500 000
$3.000,000
$2,000,000
$1,800,000
$15,000,000
$375,000
$7,000,000
$650,000
$5,000,000
$320,000
$1,500,000
$5,000,000
$500,000
$9,000,000
$6,000,000
$260,000
$380,000
$1,000,000
$250,000
$1,500,000
$600,000
$1,300,000
$99,700,000
APPENDIX
Preparation of the Financial Plan
Process to Amend the Financial Plan
Resolution Approving the Financial Plan
Resolution Adopting the Annual Budget
Adopted Budget Summary
Authorized Positions by Department
Index by Department
Property Tax Rates
Glossary
PREPARATION OF THE FINANCIAL PLAN
In August, the Finance Department writes a manual of directions and updates all forms. The
manual contains: 1 ) directions for completing the forms, 2) descriptions of expenditures that
may be budgeted in a particular line item, and 3) projected prices or inflation factors for vadous
supplies, service contracts, vehicle maintenance service, telephone and postal services, and
office fumiture and equipment.
The City Manager instructs the Department Heads on whether any changes in level of service
can be factored into the proposed financial plan. This is done before the actual budget process
starts. Changes to the financial plan are done annually dudng the budget process. All revenue
and expenditure estimates are re-evaluated and revised if necessary.
In September, the manual and forms for the next financial plan are distributed to Department
and Division Heads. They also receive salary projections, a three-year history of each
Departmenrs/Division's actual line item expenditures, and projected revenues and costs for the
three years covered by the Financial Plan. (The Finance Department projects revenues
individually and uses a combination of inflation factors and individual costs to project
expenditures.)
In October, the forms are returned. These include the Departmenrs/Division's adjustments to
line item revenue and expenditure projections, their travel request, their capital outlay request,
and professional services required.
In November, the Finance Department reviews the forms'and compiles them all into a budget.
All budget forms and adjustments are forwarded to the City Manager.
By mid-December, the City Manager and Finance Department decide which modifications to
operations will be made. A tax levy is computed. Analysis is done so all funds have required
balances or zero balances. Then the Proposed Financial Plan document is pdnted.
In January, the City Council reviews the Proposed Financial Plan.
In February, the Proposed Financial Plan and a memo of Council's changes are presented to
the public. A public headng is held at least one week pdor to the final adoption.
In March, the final Financial Plan is adopted. The State of Iowa requires a one-year budget
tO be adopted by March 15 of each year. The applicable year in Iowa City's three-year
Financial Plan is adopted as the annual budget to satisfy State requirements.
The Finance Department monitors the status of actual revenues and expenses compared to
budget. Analysis is done on a line-item basis within each division. Ultimate responsibility for
a division's budget rests with the department head in charge of that division. The Finance
Department staff normally works directly with department/division management to resolve any
.problems within the line item budget.
- 195-
PROCESS TO AMEND THE FINANCIAL PLAN
Departments and Divisions analyze their monthly financial reports to determine if a budget
amendment is needed for expenditures that were not included in the budget, for example,
capital outlay, repairs to equipment and buildings, wages for temporary employees and
overtime related to work assignments outside of the budgeted staffing level. On the
amendment requests, departments/divisions explain the reason for requesting additional funds
and also suggest a funding source for it:
1 ) Subtract budgeted funds from another item within their budget.
2) Show that additional revenue will be received.
3) Request funds from the "contingency" (see definition in Budget Glossary).
The requests are reviewed by the Budget/Management Analyst for accuracy. Then, the
Finance Director and City Manager approve or deny the request. Upon approval, the
amendment is added to the budget so that the next monthly Budget Comparison Report
includes it. Amendment requests are not accepted after a date set by the Finance Department
in order to compile necessary reports for Council action on the amended budget.
Starting in FY98, amendments are presented to the City Council twice each fiscal year and two
public hearings are held. 'The first public headng is in August/September and includes the
carryover amendments from the previous fiscal year. The second public headng is in May and
includes all other amendments so that the amended budget will be filed with the State by May
31 as required by law. Statements of budget and actual revenues and expenditures are
published by September 30 for the fiscal year ended June 30. They are also presented for
the City as a whole in the notes to that year's Financial Report. Legal compliance is met if
actual expenditures do not exceed the budgeted expenditures by program areas: community
protection, home and community environment, human development and policy and
administration.
- 196 -
Prepared by: Donald Yucuis, Finance Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240; 3'19-356-5052
RESOLUTION NO. 99~72
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF IOWA
CITY, IOWA, FOR FISCAL YEARS 2000 THROUGH 2002 AND THE MULTI-
YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2003.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Iowa City deems it in the public interest and in the
interest of good and efficient government for the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to adopt a three-year
Financial Plan for operations and a multi-year Capital Improvements Program budget; and
WHEREAS, the three-year Financial Plan and multi-year Capital Improvements Program are
subject to annual review and revisions; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 23, 1999 and March 2, 1999, at regularly
scheduled City Council meetings and public comments were received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA, THAT:
The City Council of the City of Iowa City does hereby adopt the three-year Financial Plan
for the Fiscal Years 2000 through 2002 and the multi-year Capital Improvements Program
through Fiscal Year 2003.
This Resolution is an expression of the Council's legislative intent for planning future
operation and capital improvements for the City of Iowa City, Iowa; and the anticipated
means of financing said plan, subject to applicable laws.
Passed and approved this 2nd
day of March ,1999.
AYOR
ATTEST:Ci~!L-"~'; ~
City Attomey's Office
~nadm~res~nplan .doc
- 197-
Prepared by: Donald Yucuis, Finance Director, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5052
RESOLUTION NO. 99-70
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2000.
WHEREAS, a public headng on the proposed budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2000 was
held on February 23, 1999, and March 2, 1999 at regularly scheduled City Council meetings and
public comments were received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA, THAT:
The annual budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2000, as set forth in the Adoption of
Budget and Certification of Taxes and on the Adopted Budget Summary, together with the
detailed budget in support thereof showing revenue estimates, appropriation expenditures,
and progrem allocations for said fiscal year should be and hereby is adopted.
The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the filings required by law, and to set up the
books in accordance with the summary and details, as adopted·
Passed and approved this 2nd
day of Narch ,1999.
MAYOR
A'I'rEST:
City Attomey's Office
It was moved by Norton
adopted, and upon roll call there were:
and seconded by
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT:
O'Donnell
the Resolution be
X
X
X
X
X
Champion
Kubby
Lehman
Norton
O'Donnell
Thomberry
Vanderhoef
- 198 -
- 199 -
RECEIVED
John~n Co. Iowa
COUNTY AU
ADOPTION OF BUDGET AND CERTIFICATION OF TAXES
RlcelYeerJulyl, 1999 through June30, 2000
crrYoF Iowa City Peebee 60,148
CERT1RCATION
?o: c~W~ee, v~ea~s~-v,,~ Johnson c~. ,_
7".,: 0' .'; ..' ;-..' = .'-,....."' .'.. ~ .= 7 '" ~ ";d. ~.
Iowa City, IA 52240
.. ,' Z:j:'; ~:' --': :; .~ ........ -.
RUNG
affid/Viffpoet~fotettiesundet200~_e~e,_~etioo)wlhNOountyAudRorbyMImh15, 1999
~ t, 1i
DetetT~eStlmp~t I~gETIF 3
38~,12(8)
384.12(10}
384.12(11)
3S4.12(12)
384.12(13)
384.12(16)
3e4.'f2(18)
384.i2(i)
3s4.i2~
384.12('3)
384.12(,d)
384.12(5)
384.12~
:384.12~)
28~22
384.8
Rate
44
45
46
4/
49
50
52
Telel 6mweiFlmdTm~ Le, deel2~ + 21l
$.2't Emeq~myf~fum:S-'~vyeme) 28
1,L '.
AmtNee FICA&lP~RS~gm~lfuad~tlewllmlt] 30 ·
~:~2~ i:::.: ~"Z';::~,!::; :.:,;:::~:~i:,~ .:,L;::;:: ....~:!"' :E' . ":' ::" 'r~":' ::'.::::~ .............::, :: "'::. ........
vaueua~2 35 67
valueDon ~ 36
VNulon 4 37 69
TdallSMIO(341hm37) 38 F~,
Te~dk..~,b,~R.,,,,-..F,,ma. LevTm+ul 3~ 3,46 ?64
384.4 AmtNec De~tSe,~ceLe~y
384.7 A4 Vo~ C~ ~m~ ReeNe 4~ 0
Total Tax (27+39+40+4t) ~ ? .t. q44.907
.. A~X~e~expe~dltum do meaNed pul~mhed ot peeted emo,.m~m eec~olthe fouf pr~m m. or ffi toml.
__Thi~bu~getwascertffiedon~'lx~o~M~ch15. 1998.
CITY OF IOWA CITY
PERSONNEL LISTING BY DEPARTMENT
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS
FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002
Adopted Projected Projected
Administration 24.50 25.00 25.50 27.00 27.00 27.00 27.00
Airport Operations 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.00
. .Assisted Housing 12.75 11.75 10.75 11.75 10.75 10.75 10.75
Broadband Telecommunications 3.60 3.60 4.60 4.75 5.25 5.25 5.25
*Equipment Maintenance 10.00 10,50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50 9.50
Finance 37.39 37.39 37.39 38.77 39.77 40.77 40.77
Fire Department 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 55.00 58.00
Housing &Inspection SeNices 13.00 13.00 14.13 14.13 14.13 14.13 14.13
JCCOG 4.80 4.80 5.80 6.10 6.10 6.10 6.10
'Library 37.25 37.25 37.25 37.25 39.50. 39.50 39.50
Library Development Office Salary 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25
Parking 27.25 27.50 27.50 30.50 30.50 30.50 30.50
'Parks &Recreation 36.75 37.75 38.75 40.25 42.75 42.75 42.75
Planning/Community Development 13.70 13.70 13.20 13.30 13.30 13.30 13.30
Police Department 86.56 , 87.50 93.25 94.75 101.75 101.75 101.75
":Public Works 121.00 124.00 122.50 122.10 124.10 124.10 124.10
Public Works CIP Project Mgmt. - 3.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Senior Center 5.50 5,50 5.50 5.50 6.00 6.00 6.00
.... Transit 49.00 48.50 49.50 48.00 48.25 48.25 48.25
Grand Total 538.55 543.24 553.87 564.40 581.65 585.90 588.90
* 7.50 FTE for Transit Maintenance were moved from Equipment Division to Transit Division mid-year FY95. FY96 adopted
has been restated with the positions moved. See "FY 2000 Additional Position Requests" for description of new positions
---scheduled in FY 2000, 2001 and 2002.
- 201 -
Number of Authorized
Positions Per Department
Admin.
AirportOpts.
Asst. Housing
Broadband Tele.
EquipmentMaint.
Finance
Firs Dept.
HIS
JCCOG
L,b,a
Pa~ing
Parks & Recreation
Ranning/Camm. Dev,
Police Dept. , =
Public Works '~ _~ " .
St. Center -~' ] ]
Transit ': "f
0.00 20.00 40.00 80.00 80.00 100.00 # Positions
(] FY2000
~ FY99
]] FY98
~ FY97
120,00
140.00
202 -
PERSONNEL RECONCILIATION
Full Time Equivalents (FTE) by Departments and Divisions
FY 2000 - FY 2002 Adopted Financial Plan
ADMINISTRATION
City Council
City Clerk
Police Citizens Review Board
City Attorney
City Manager
Human Relations
Human Rights Activities
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
FY2000
FY99 New Total
FY99 Additioas by Positions in Authorized /
Original Council FY2000 Requested
Budget Resolution Budget Positions
7.00
4.50
0.50
6.00
3.00
4.00
2.00
27.00
AIRPORT OPERATIONS
7.00
4.50
0.50
6.00
3.00
4.00
2.00
27.00
ASSISTED HOUSING
BROADBAND TELECOt4MUNICATIONS
1.50 0.25 1.75
11.75 (1.00) 10.75
4.75 0.50- 5.25
EQUIPMENT
General Fleet Maintenance
Equipment Replacement
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
FINANCE
Finance Dept. Administration
Accounting ~ Reporting
Central Procurement
Treasury
Document Services
Information Services
I.S. Police Grant
Central Sup. ez Print
Risk Management
Employee Benefits
TOTAL FINANCE
8.70
0.80
9.50
2.67
7.00
3.76
10.38
4.00
5.95
1.00
2.00
1.56
0.45
38.77
0.50 1.50
(1.00)
(0.50) 1.50
8.70
0.80
9.50
2.67
7.00
3.76
10.38
4.00
7.95
2.00
1.56
0.45
39.77
FIRE PROTECTION
52.00
52.00
HOUSING a~ INSPECTION SVCS.
His Department Administration
Building Inspection
Housing Inspections
TOTAL H.I.S.
].C.C.O.G.
Administration
Transportation Plan
Human Services
Solid Waste Management
TOTAL ]CCOG
LIBRARY
Ubrary
3.13
7.0O
4.O0
14.13
1.10
3.00
1.00
1.00
6.10
37.25
2.25
3.13
7.00
4.00
14.13
1.10
3.00
1.00
1.00
6.10
39.50
Library Reciprocal Borrowing/Regional
Library Reference
Library Dev. Office Salary
TOTAL LIBRARY
0.75
! 30
39.50
2.25
0.75
1.50
41.75
- 203 -
PERSONNEL RECONCILIATION
Full Time Equivalents (FTE) by Departmenu and Divisions
FY 2000 - FY 2002 Adopted Financial Plan
FY2000
FY99 New Total
FY99 Additions by Positions in Authorized
Original Council FY2000 Requested
Budget Resolution Budget Positions
PARKING / TRANSIT
Parking System Operations
Mass Transit Operations
TOTAL PARKING/TRANSIT
30.50 30.50
48.00 0.25 48.25
78.50 0.25 78.75
PARKS ez RECREATION
Government Buildings
CBD Maintenance
Forestry Operations
Cemetery
Recreation
Parks
Parks ez Rec Dept. Admin.
TOTAL PARKS 8z RECREATION
4.08 4.08
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
3.00 3.00
13. i 7 1.50 ] 4.67
12.00 1.00 13.00
2.00 2.00
40.25 2.50 42.75
PLANNING st COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
Administration 2.05 2.05
Urban Planning 3.50 3.50
Nelgborhood Services 1.00 1.00
Non-Grant Comm. Development i.00 1.00
Economic Development 1.00 - 1.00
!'4isc. Community Development 1.30 1.30
CDBG Metro Entidernent 3.45 3.45
TOTAL PCD 13.30 - 13.30
POLICE DEPARTHENT
Administration 3.00 1.00 4.00
Police Patrol 59.00 6.00 65.00
Criminal Investigation 9.00 9.00
Records And Identification 5.00 - 5.00
Community Services Bureau 2.00 2.00
Emergency Communications Ctr. I 1.25 11.25
Animal Control 5.50 5,50
TOTAL POLICE 94.75 7.00 I Ol .75
PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering i 0.60 10.60
Public Works 2.00 2.00
Energy Conservation 0.50 0.50
Traffic Engineering 4. 15 4.15
CIP - Special Projects 5.00 2.00 7.00
Streets Maintenance 22.50 1.00 23.50
Wastewater Trmt Oper 25.30 25.30
Water Oper. ez !~laint. 25.20 1.00 26.20
Refuse Collection Operations 20.35 20.35
Landfill Operations 11.50 11.50
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 127,10 4,00 131.10
SENIOR CENTER 5.50 0.50 6.00
GRAND TOTAL 564.40 (I.O0) 18.25 581.65
FY99 Original Budget has been corrected to reflect the following: Transit reduced by -0.75
FTE due to overstatement of 3/4 bus driver; rounding of positions in Finance Dept -0.02
FTE; and Animal Shelter Kennel Asst +0.06 FTE. Total Correction = -0.71 FTE.
- 204 -
INDEX OF BUDGET UNITS BY DEPARTMENT
PAGE
ADMINISTRATION
City Council ......................................................................57
City Clerk .........................................................................57
City Attorney ....................................................................57
City Manager ....................................................................58
Human Relations 58
Human Rights ...................................................................61
Broadband Telecommunications Operations & Reserves ......... 101
FINANCE
Finance Administration .......................................................59
Accounting .......................................................................59
Central Procurement Services ..............................................59
Treasury ...........................................................................60
Document Services ............................................................60
Information Services .........................................................114
Non-Operational Administration ........................................... 62
Central Services ...............................................................118
PLANNING & COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
PCD Administration ............................................................63
Urban Planning & Development ............................................ 63
Neighborhood Services .......................................................64
Community Development Non-Grant ..................................... 64
Economic Development ...................................................... 65
Comprehensive Plan Update ................................................ 65
Planning & Development Grants ........................................... 65
JCCOG Summary ............................................................. 110
JCCOG Administration ...................................................... 110
JCCOG Transportation Planning .......................................... 111
JCCOG Human Services .................................................... 111
JCCOG Solid Waste Management ....................................... 112
Community Development Other Grants ................................ 112
CDBG Metro Entitlement .................................................... 113
Community Development Flood Grant .................................. 113
PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works Administration ................................................ 66
Engineering .......................................................................66
Energy Conservation Administration ..................................... 67
Traffic Engineering .............................................................68
Street System Maintenance ................................................. 68
Wastewater Treatment Operations ....................................... 90
Wastewater Treatment Reserves .......................................... 91
Water Operations ..............................................................94
Water Reserves 94
Refuse Collection Operations ............................................... 96
Landfill Operations .............................................................97
Landfill Reserves ................................................................98
-205 -
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
HOUSING & INSPECTION
SERVICES
LIBRARY
PARKS & RECREATION
SENIOR CENTER
AIRPORT
PARKING & TRANSIT
NOT CONSIDERED PART
OF A DEPARTMENT
Equipment Maintenance ..................................................... 116
Equipment Reserve ...........................................................117
Energy Conservation .........................................................123
Police Summary ..................................................................71
Police Administration ..........................................................72
Patrol ...............................................................................72
Criminal Investigation .........................................................73
Records and Identification ...................................................73
Community Services Bureau ................................................ 74
Emergency Communications ................................................ 74
Animal Control 75
Fire ..................................................................................76
Fire Equipment Replacement Reserve ................................... 117
HIS Administration .............................................................77
Building Inspection .............................................................77
Housing Inspection ............................................................78
Assisted Housing ..............................................................121
Library .............................................................................81
Library Replacement Reserves ............................................ 119
Parks &Recreation Administration 79
Parks ...............................................................................79
Recreation 80
Government Buildings ........................................................61
C.B.D. Maintenance ...........................................................67
Forestry/Horticulture ..........................................................69
Cemetery .........................................................................69
Parkland Reserves .............................................................120
Senior Center ....................................................................82
Airport Operations ............................................................100
Parking Operations .............................................................83
Parking Reserves ...............................................................84
Public Transit Operations ....................................................87
Public Transit Reserves .......................................................89
Debt Service Fund ............................................................103
Employees Benefits Trust ...................................................105
Road Use Tax ..................................................................107
Risk Management Loss Reserve .......................................... 124
Health Insurance Reserve ...................................................124
Special Assessments .........................................................125
RISE Repayment ...............................................................125
- 206 - --
TAX LEVIES FOR IOWA CITY AREA
TAXING DISTRICTS
Actual Actual Actual
FY97 FY98 FY99
COUNTY LEVIES IN CITIES
GENERAL BASIC
GENERAL SUPPLEMENTAL
MH-DD SERVICES
5.23778 5.17191 5.37568
3.50000 3.50000 3.50000
0.43904 0.54734 0.84483
1.29874 1.07457 1.03085
IOWA CITY ASSESSOR LEVIES
0.21538 0.23257 0.30415
AC, EXTENSION COUNCIL LEVIES
0.06165 0.05992 0.06734
AREA X COMMUNITY COLLEGE LEVIES
GENERAL
TORT LIABILITY
PLANT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
INSURANCE
UNEMPLOYMENT
EARLY RETIREMENT
EARLY RETIREMENT
0.58862 0.59506 0.56710
0.20250 0.20250 0.20250
0.02171 0.01335 0.01459
0.20250' 0.20250 0.20250
0.09000 0.09000 0.09000
0.04608 0.0:3025 0.01847
0.0100:3 0.00000 0.00000
0.01580 0.05646 0.0:3904
0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
STATE OF IOWA
0.00500 0.00500 0.00500
SCHOOL
GENERAL
HOUSE
17.1:3035 19.9~016 17.0751:3
10.:35920 10.47499 10.35190
1.77115 1.74517 1.7232:3
CITY LEVIES
GENERAL
SPECIAL
1~.6575:3 17.79617 1:3.1:334:3
9.32000 9.:32000 9.43079
3.3325:3 3.47617 3.70264
TOTAL
30.89131 31.03079
Residential Rollback
0.593180 0.588284
31.5278:3
0.549090
207 -
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
PROPERTY TAX RATES - ALL DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTS
Last Ten Fiscal Years
(per $1,000 assessed valuation)
Collection
Year
Iowa City Kirkwood
School City of Johnson Community
District Iowa City County~ Coll~ge
State of
Iowa
Total
1989-90 11.042
1990-91 11.347
1991-92 11.081
1992-93 11.331
1993-94 12.334
1994-95 12.338
1995-96 12.634
1996-97 12.130
1997-98 12.220
1998-99 12.075
12 028
12 128
12 670
12 826
12 900
12 954
12.992
12.653
12.796
13.133
4.992 0.482
5.327 0.481
5.667 0.502
6.378 0.532
6.431 0.539
6.431 0.530
5.790 0.593
5.515 0.589
5.414 0.595
5.747 0.567
0 005
0 005
0 005
0 005
0 005
0 005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
28.549
29.288
29.925
31.072
32.209
32.258
32.014
30.892
31.031
31.528
Source: "Tax Levies for Johnson County, Iowa," compiled by the Johnson County Auditor.
Note:
~I 1
nc udes Johnson County, the City of Iowa City Assessor and Agricultural Extension levies.
Ratio of
Iowa City
to Total
42.1
41.4
42.3
41.3
40.1
40.2
40.6
41.0
41.2
41.7
-208 -
GLOSSARY
Assessed Valuation: The estimated value placed upon real and personal property by the City
Assessors as the basis for levying property taxes.
Bonded Debt: A written promise to pay a specified sum of money at a future date along with
pedodic interest. Proceeds from bonds are typically used for long-term debt to pay for
construction of capital projects.
Budget: A financial plan for a specific time pedod that estimates the expenditures and the
means of financing those expenditures which are associated with all services and
functions performed by the City.
Capital Improvements Program (CIP): A management tool used to assist in the scheduling,
planning, and execution of a series of capital improvements over a seven-year period.
The CIP is updated annually. It sets forth the estimated expenditures by year and
specifies the resources estimated to be available to finance the project expenditures.
Capital Improvements Projects: The specific projects that make up the Capital
Improvements Program. The projects involve construction, purchase, or renovation of
city facilities or property. They are generally non-recurring major improvements to the
City's physical plant which necessitate long-term financing and are permanent in nature.
Capital Outlay: Expenditures for fixed assets, such as equipment, remodeling, minor building
improvements, and vehicles, that are funded from the operating budget. Since long-
term financing is not necessary and expenditures of this type are of such recurring
character, these items are not part of the Capital Improvements Program.
Commodities: Items or supplies needed for routine maintenance and operations. They
include cleaning, maintenance and office supplies, repair materials, minor equipment,
and tools.
Contingency: Funds set aside, but not appropriated or approved for use. These funds could
be used for unanticipated expenditure requirements, new programs, or to absorb
unexpected revenue losses.
Debt Service: Payment of principal and interest to holders of the City debt instruments.
Department: A major organizational unit in the City comprised of related work activities aimed
at accomplishing a major service or regulatory program.
Division: An organizational subdivision of a department.
Employee Benefits: Contributions made by the City to designated funds to meet
commitments or obligations for employee fringe benefits. Included are the City's share
of costs for Social Security, Iowa Retirement System, and the other pension, medical,
and life insurance plans.
Enterprise Fund: Separate financial entity used for government operations that are financed
mainly from user fees.
Expenditures: The cost of goods received and services rendered.
-209 -
Fiscal Year: A 12-month time period to which the annual operating budget applies. In Iowa,
the fiscal year begins July I and ends the following June 30.
Full-time Equivalent (FTE) Positions: A pad-time position converted to the decimal
equivalent position based on total hours per year. Full-time positions charged to more
than one program are shown as an appropriate fraction in each program.
Fund:
An independent fiscal and accounting entity with a self-balancing set of accounts
recording cash, which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities
or attaining certain objectives.
Fund Balance: The cash balance that remains in a fund on a given date after all receipts and
expenditures have been recorded.
General Fund: The fund supported by taxes, fees, and other revenues that may be used for
any lawful purpose.
General Obligation Bonds: When the city pledges its full faith and credit to the repayment
of the bonds it issues, then those bonds are general obligation (G.O.) bonds.
Grants: Contributions or gifts of cash or other assets from another governmental entity to be
used or expended for a specified purpose, activity or facility.
Intergovernmental Revenue: A contribution of assets (usually cash) by one governmental
unit or other organization to another. Typically, these contributions are made to local
governments from the State and Federal govemments. Grants are usually made for
specified purposes.
Internal Service Fund: Funds used to account for the financing of goods or services provided
by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of the City, on a cost
reimbursement basis.
Non-Departmentah Program costs that do not relate to any one department, but represent
costs of a general City-wide nature.
Operating Transfer: Routine and/or recurring transfers of assets between funds.
Personal Services: Services rendered by full-time and part-time employees to support the
functions of City departments. Costs include salaries, fringes and other related benefits.
Program: A distinct function of city govemment provided to the public or a function providing
support to the direct services of other city departments.
Reserves: An account used to earmark a fund balance or a portion of a fund balance for a
specific use. A reserve may be established formally by ordinance or resolution or
informally by administrative action.
Revenue: Income dedved from taxes, fees, grants and charges. In the broader sense,
"revenue" refers to all government income, regardless of source, to fund services.
-210-
Revenue Bonds: A bond that is payable from a specific source of revenue and to which full
faith and credit of the city is not pledged.
Services and Charges: A category of expenditures used for the purchase of services
provided by individuals. businesses or agencies who are not in the direct employ of the
City.
Special Assessment: A tax levied against a property owner to offset all or part of the cost of
public capital improvements which are deemed to benefit that particular property.
Special assessments are commonly used to finance improvement projects such as
street construction, sidewalk construction, or installation of sewer lines. Special
assessments are levied in addition to regular property taxes.
Subsidy: Financial aid given to a governmental unit by another governmental unit. For
example, in Iowa City, the General Fund subsidizes Public Transit with property tax
monies.
Tax Incremental Financing District (T.I.F.): A geographical area designated for public and
pdvate development. Public improvements are funded by debt which is repaid through
segregating the increased property taxes resulting from pdvate development.
Tort Liability: A tort is a wrong against an individual or property that is neither a crime nor a
violation of a contract. The City could be found liable or responsible by a court when
a tort occurs on City property, as a result of the actions of a City employee, or the
function of a City operated activity. The City levies a special taxto purchase tort liability
insurance and to cover the cost of tort damages for which the City is found responsible.
Transfers: Financial transactions that occur between City funds.
Trust and Agency: Funds used to account for monies held by the City in a trustee, custodial
or agent capacity for the City's pension and retirement funds and for other entities such
as other governmental units. The budget includes the Johnson County Council of
Govemments (JCCOG) which is a joint endeavor among city governments within
Johnson County and the county govemment.
Consumer Survey
Growth Issues
April 1999
Prepared for
Smart Growth Task Force
By
Economics Department
National Association of Home Builders
Washington, DC 20005
CONSUMERS' SURVEY
ON
GROWTH ISSUES
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Graph of Census Regions
Introduction
QUALITY OF LIFE
Living conditions in your community
Most important issues facing your area
Quality of life in your neighborhood compared to five years ago and expected by 2004
Satisfaction with the quality of life
GROWTH AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
Pace of growth and development in your area
Feelings about growth in your area
Most favorable (positive) aspects of growth in your area
Most unfavorable (negative) aspects of growth in your area
Your issues of major concern, if you controlled the growth of your community
Responsibility for addressing growth issues: federal, state or local government.
Performance of local govt. in managing and dealing with various aspects of growth
Approaches to influence growth and development
Actions to protect the environment/wildlife based on environmental or economic
considerations
Agreement/disagreement with different statements on growth issues
Ways to direct development to meet housing needs
Governments' zoning and planning process should accommodate population growth
Who pays for schools, streets and sewers?
Who should pay for roads, sewers and schools, in new developments?
THE TERMS GROWTH & SPRAWL
What do you think of when you hear the term growth?
What do you think of when you hear the term sprawl?
FARMLAND PRESERVATION/ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUNDARIES
Favor or oppose laws that prevent farmland from being converted to other uses
Establish boundaries that prevent development of land outside the boundaries
Page #
i-v
3
4
5
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
19
20
20
21
DENSITY
Support or oppose single family homes at a higher density in your neighborhood
Support or oppose multifamily apartment buildings or townhouses in your neighborhood
SOLUTION TO TRAFFIC PROBLEM
Best solution to traffic problem
TRANSPORTATION PATTERNS
Access to transportation and transportation presently used
RESPONSIBILITY FOR GROWTH
Who is responsible for growth in your area?
IMPROVE/PRESERVE ENVIRONMENT
What should builders and developers do to help improve/preserve the environment?
PLAN TO BUY A HOME
Plan to buy a home in next two years
Type of home you will buy
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
Type of present home
Type of home preferred
Prefer a townhouse in the city or detached home in outlying urban area
Importance of different factors if you were to buy a new home today
Prepared to accept in a home to make it affordable
Community amenities that would seriously influence you to move
Features you would look for in choosing your next home
Things you would support to make housing more affordable
RESPONDENT'S PROFILE
Family composition
Age of head of household
Household income
Year your home was built
Year your neighborhood was built
Registered voter
22
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
31
33
35
36
37
39
39
40
41
41
42
Executive Summary
While Americans express concerns about growth and related issues, particularly traffic,
they are generally satisfied with the quality of life in their neighborhoods and prefer current
growth patterns over higher density development, according to a survey conducted in early
1999 by the National Association of Home Builders.
The written survey of 2,000 randomly selected households nationwide and 3,000
households in 10 metro areas (300 households in each of the selected metre areas) showed
that Americans associate growth with economic opportunities and strongly believe that
government should plan and manage growth rather than restrict or stop it. The survey results
were consistent across regions and metro markets.
Furthermore, the survey confirmed that Americans overwhelmingly prefer a single-family
detached home on a large lot in the suburbs to any other type of home. And, even though they
cite traffic as a major concern, the majority drives to work alone and wants to continue to do so.
QUALITY OF LIFE
· Living conditions in your community are moving in the right direction according to 40 percent
and in the wrong direction for 15 percent of the households. More than one third (37
percent) of the households think that the direction of living conditions are mixed in the
community.
· Crime/Drug/Gangs topped the list (50 percent of responses) of the three most important
issues facing your area, followed by traffic/roads (46 percent) and growth/development (39
percent).
· Quality of life in the neighborhood is about the same or better for 71 percent and worse for
20 percent of the households. The remaining 9 percent are not sure. About 65 percent of
the households expect the living conditions in their area to be about the same or better by
2004. Twenty-nine percent of the respondents expect living conditions by 2004 to be worse.
GROVVTH AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
· Eighty-nine percent of the households responding are somewhat to very satisfied with the
quality of life in their neighborhood and only 10 percent are not satisfied.
· Pace of growth and development in your area is considered too fast by 42 percent of the
households and about right or too slow by 47 percent. The remaining 11 percent are not
concerned or are not sure.
· About 50 percent of the households responding have positive feelings and 37 percent have
negative feelings about growth in their area.
· The top three favorable aspects of growth are growth creates jobs (54 percent), generates
economic growth (48 percent) and better shopping/services (44 percent).
· Heavier traffic is by far the most unfavorable aspect of growth for 79 percent of the
respondents followed by more crime (47 percent) and reduces open spaces (45 percent).
· Responding to the question "if you controlled the growth of your community, which of the
following issues would be your major concerns", having good quality schools topped the list
with 69 percent of households, followed by reducing traffic congestion (64 percent), paying
for needed public improvements as growth occurs (59 percent) and protecting the
environment (58 percent).
· Local government is responsible for addressing growth issues according to 72 percent of
households. This is followed by state government (14 percent) and the federal government
(3 percent).
· Performance of local government in managing overall growth was rated good to excellent by
27 percent, fair by 39 percent and preservation of open space was rated as good to
excellent by 31 percent, fair by 41 percent of the respondents.
· Roads and highways were rated good to excellent by 37 percent, fair by 40 percent and
schools were rated good to excellent by 29 percent, fair by 37 percent of the respondents.
· Plan and manage growth is the approach overwhelmingly suggested by 75 percent of the
households which local government should take to influence growth and development. Only
12 percent of the respondents suggested passing laws to restrict growth.
· Actions to protect wildlife should be based on both environmental and economic
considerations according to more than 90 percent of the respondents.
· About one fourth agree with the statement; "Growth is not good as it reduces open spaces"
and 70 percent of the respondents agree with the statement "Managed properly, growth is
good for the community".
· About half of the respondents agree with the statement "Growth is necessary because it
creates jobs" and more than one third of the respondents agree and 21 percent disagree
with the statement, "Growth is necessary because it creates tax revenues".
· About 45 percent of the respondents agree with the statement, "Growth brings new
infrastructure" and only 16 percent of the respondents agree with the statement, "Growth
provides new affordable housing".
· About 39 percent of the respondents agree with the statement, "Growth is not good because
schools get crowded" and about 57 percent of the respondents agree with the statement,
"Growth creates air and noise pollution".
· The most preferred way to build n~w homes to meet housing needs due to growth in the
number of households is "build new homes in existing, partially developed, suburban areas"
according to 44 percent of the respondents, followed by "build new homes on vacant land in
the central city or inner suburbs" (37 percent) and "build new homes in outlying areas" (20
percent).
· Nearly three out of four respondents indicated "yes", that the government's zoning and
planning process should accommodate expected growth in population, 8 percent said no
and 19 percent are not sure.
· In response to the statement "Other people paid for schools, streets and sewers, before I
moved in, so it's only natural for current residents (including myself) to pay for schools,
streets and sewers for those who will move into my area in the future", about 60 percent of
the respondents agree that current residents should pay for schools, streets and sewers.
· In response to the question, "Who should pay for roads, sewers and schools", 59 percent
indicated developers, 20 percent favored all taxpayers in the area and 21 percent favored
people who buy homes.
THE TERMS GROWTH AND SPRAWL
Generally, the term growth has positive connotations and the term sprawl has negative
connotations:
· The term growth means more opportunities, economic growth, additional jobs, new
businesses, retail businesses, more people and diversity of people.
· This also means more traffic, congestion, overcrowding, noise and pollution, new
neighborhoods, more taxes and growing pains.
· The term sprawl means more people, more concentrated, traffic congestion, long commutes,
too spread out over large area and haphazard growth.
FARMLAND PRESERVATION/ESTABLISHMENT OF BOUNDARIES
· About 50 percent of the respondents favor laws that prevent farmland from being converted
to other uses and 36 percent oppose such laws. The remaining 16 percent are not sure.
· About half the respondents favor and one-third oppose laws to establish boundaries around
towns and cities that prevent the development of land outside the boundaries.
I11
DENSITY
· More than three out of four respondents oppose and only 15 percent support building single
family homes at a higher density (smaller lots or more homes per acre) in their
neighborhood.
· About 78 percent oppose building multifamily apartments and 54 percent oppose building
townhouses in their neighborhood.
SOLUTION TO THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM
· Responding to the question regarding the best solution to traffic problems, 44 percent favor
widening roads followed by more public transportation (33 percent) and building new streets
and roads (27 percent). About one fourth (24 percent) favor stopping building development
while 18 percent reported that traffic is not a problem.
TRANSPORTATION PATTERNS
· About 47 percent of the respondents have access to bus/trolley, 17 percent car pool, 16
percent have access to train or light rail, and over 90 percent drive their own car.
· Even though 47 percent of the respondents have access to bus/trolley for commuting to
work, only 3 percent use it. Train or light rail is available to 16 percent of the respondents
and only 2 percent use it. Eighty-five of the respondents drive own car to work.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR GROVVTH
· Fifty-eight percent of respondents said that local government is responsible for growth and
this is followed by builder/developer (52 percent), elected officials (42 percent) and
community leaders (37 percent). Only 24 percent of the respondents indicated that
homebuyers are responsible for growth in their area.
IMPROVE/PRESERVE ENVIRONMENT
· Eighty-eight percent indicated that builders/developers should build more energy efficient
homes and equip them with energy saving appliances. That was followed by leave or plant
as many trees as possible (87 percent), protect environmentally sensitive areas, e.g.,
wetlands (87 percent), preserve wildlife habitat (59 percent), and make greater use of
recycled materials (57 percent). Only 20 percent of the respondents indicated preserve
open spaces by clustering development.
PLAN TO BUY A HOME
· About 16 percent of the respondents plan to buy a home in next two years.
· More than one fourth (29 percent) of the respondents who plan to buy a home during the
next 2 years will buy a new home and 42 percent will buy an existing home.
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
· Respondents were asked to consider two options:
buying a $150,000 townhouse in an
urban setting close to public transportation, work, and shopping. Or, you could purchase a
larger, detached single family home in an outlying suburban area, with longer distances to
work, public transportation, and shopping. Eighty-three percent preferred a $150,000
detached unit in a suburban area.
· Crime rate was rated as very important by 84 percent, followed by quality of community or
neighborhood (82 percent), price of home (79 percent), and size and features of home (68
percent).
· In response to the question, "If you cannot afford to buy the house you want, what would
you be prepared to accept to make it more affordable to you," farther away from shopping
and entertainment and unfinished spaces were the top 2 choices with 58 percent of the
respondents, followed by a smaller house (42 percent) and a longer commute to work (40
percent).
· Highway access and park areas are the top two amenities that would seriously influence 55
percent and 51 percent of the respondents, respectively, to move to a new community.
They are followed by walking/jogging trails (48 percent), and lakes (38 percent).
· A more energy efficient home is the number one feature respondents would look for if
buying a home (69 percent). This is followed by less traffic (42 percent), a bigger house (42
percent), reduced exterior maintenance (38 percent), and a bigger lot (35 percent).
· Respondents' opinions regarding things they would support to make housing more
affordable in their area was divided. About one-third of the respondents indicated none, 29
percent would support providing government assistance to homebuyers and 31 percent
would support the use of a flexible approach to protecting the environment.
Introduction
CONSUMERS' SURVEY ON GROWTH ISSUES
The objective of the survey is to measure consumer attitudes on growth issues. Four
focus groups on growth issues were conducted in the following places: Fairfax, VA, Columbus,
OH, Dallas, TX and Ventura, CA. These focus groups were conducted during December 1998
and January 1999. A summary of findings from the focus groups is in Appendix I. A survey
questionnaire was developed from the experience gained at the focus groups. This
questionnaire was mailed to two statistically selected random samples of households. A
national sample of 2,000 households and another random sample of 3,000 households (300 in
each of the 10 selected metropolitan areas) were selected from a panel of households
maintained by National Family Opinion Organization (NFO), a nationally known survey research
firm. The survey questionnaire (Appendix I) was mailed on March 2, 1999. Responses were
received from 1,205 households in the national sample and 1,831 households in the ten metro
areas. The response rate for the national sample is 60 percent and for metro areas it is 61
percent. The response rate from households in the ten metropolitan areas varies from 54
percent in Phoenix, AZ to 67 percent in Sacramento, CA. Table 1 below gives the number
mailed and responses received.
Table 1
Sampling Plan
National Sample Number Mailed Number Received Response Rate
1. Northeast 320 192 60%
2. Midwest 440 259 59%
3. South 800 501 63%
4. West 440 253 57%
Total 2,000 1,205 60%
Metropolitan Areas Sample
5. Atlanta, GA 300 187 62%
6. Minneapolis, MN 300 177 59%
7. Chicago, III 300 178 59%
8. Philadelphia, PA 300 188 63%
9. Denver, CO 300 185 62%
10. Phoenix, AZ 300 162 54%
11. Orlando, FL 300 180 60%
12. Seattle, Wash 300 178 59%
13. Wash DC 300 196 65%
14. Sacramento, CA 300 200 67%
Total 3,000 1,831 61%
Overall Total 5,000 3,036 61%
All the questions in the national sample and metro areas sample have been analyzed by
the following five banners.
Banners for analyzing National Sample
1. Census Region
Northeast
Midwest
South
West
2. Year neighborhood was built
Before 1960
1960-1969
1970-1979
1980-1989
1990 or later
3. Housing Tenure
Owner
Renter
4. Age of the head of household
25-34 years old
35-44 years old
45-54 years old
55-years and older
5. Combined household income
Less than $40,000
$40,000 -$49,000
$50,000-$74,000
$75,000-$99,000
$100,000 and over
Banners for analyzing Metro Sample
1 Year neighborhood was built
Before 1970
1970-1989
1990 or later
2.. Housing Tenant
Home Owner
Renter
3. Age of the head of household
Less than 35 years old
35-54 years old
55-years and older
4. Combined household income
Less then $35,000
$35,000 -$49,999
$50,000-$59,999
$100,000 and over
2
Livind Conditions in Your Community
Living conditions in your community are moving in the right direction according to 40
pement and in the wrong direction for 15 pement of the households. More than one third (37
percent) of the households think that the direction of living conditions are mixed in the
community.
Q1.
Chart 1
Direction of Living Conditions In Your Community
Mixec !
15 %
ight
0%
There are some regional differences, though not significant, in the response about
direction at living conditions in your community. There are very pronounced differences across
motto areas regarding household feelings about the direction of living conditions in Iheir local
markets. in Minneapolis! over 50 pement of the households indicated lhat living conditions in
their community are moving in the right direction and only 6 pement feel they are mowng in the
wrong direction. Thirty~five percent indicated a mixed direction. tn Atlanta, more than one third
(35 percent) of the households ~eel ~ha[ living conditions in their community are in the ngt~t
direction and about one fourth said in the wron9 direction,
3
Most important issues Facinq Your Area
Crime/Drug/Gangs topped this list (50 percent of responses) of the three most important
issues facing your area, followed by traffic/roads (46 percent) and growth/development (39
percent), Schools, taxes too high and jobs/economy were ranked as the 4"', 5% and 6m most
impon:ant issues for 38 percent, 35 percent and 32 percent of the households, respectively,
Chart 2
Q2. Top 3 Most Important Issues Facing Your Area
..................................... :!:~J~.y ..............................................................
50
Percent of Respondents
There area some differences across regions and metre marke~s, In Atlanta, the top
three jssues are traffic/roads (65 percent), growth/development (48 percent) and
crime/drugs/gangs (46 percent), whereas in Denver the top 3 issues are traffic/roads
percent), growth/development (61 percent) and crime/drugs/gangs (38 percent),
Quahtv of Life in Your Neiqnborhood Compared to 5 Years Aqo and Expected bV 2004
Quality oi life in the neighborhood is about the same or better lot 71 percent and worse
for 20 percent of the households, The remaining 9 percent are not sure, About 65 percent of
the households expectthe living conditions in their area to be about the same or better by 2004.
Twenty-nine percent of the respondents expect living conditions by 2004 to be worse,
Chart 3
Q16. Quality Of Life In Your Neighborhood Compared
sure/do not TO 5 Years Ago Better
~. ",~ "",.,..~ , ~ !~.i..,~
Chart 4
Q17, Living Conditions In This Area By 2004 Will Be
Not sure/do no; Better, About The Same Or Worse
know _ _ Better
Worse
29%
Them am some differences in responses regarding quality of life 5 years ago or living
condition expectations by 2004 across census regions and metre areas, Atlanta is the oniy
metre area where more respondents (50 percent) expect living conditions by 2004 to be worse
compared [o those who rated then about the same or better (44 percent). In all other metre
areas the percentage of respOndents rating living Conditions to be the Same or better are more
than those rating worse,
5
Satisfaction with the Quality of Life
Eighty-nine percent of the households responding are somewhat to very satisfied with
the quality of life in their neighborhood and only 10 percent are not satisfied, There are no
difieences in the level of satisfaction across regions and motto markets covered in the suNey,
Chart 5
Q15, Level Of Satisfaction With The Quality Of Life In
Your Neighborhood
NSt satisfied Not sure
.,..i. :. ', :, ,:: :! ,' ! i.5 :,, :':: ,. ,..., .:. ,',: !, i:" ,.?-::cz,:,.,:ii.
'i i!.'ii;'i:,. i',:L.,
36%
GROWTHANDtTSCONSEQUENCES
Pace of Grow[h and Develocment {n Your Area
Pace of growth and development in your area is considered too fast by 42 percent ot the
households and about right or too slow by 47 percent. The remaining 11 percent are not
Concerned or are not sure.
Chart 6
No[ concernea Q3, Pace Of Growth In Your Area No~ sure/ao not
6% ~ - .............. know
5%
TOO faSl
42%
Although Ihere are no significant differences in response regarding pace of growth in
different regions of the country, differences exist among major metro markets, In Atlanta,
Denver, Phoenix and Seattle over 70 percent of the households considered the rate of growth in
their markets [oo fast compared to 39 pement of the households in Minneapolis,
Feelinos about Growth in Your Area
About 50 percent of the households responding have positive feelings and 37 percent
Have negative feelings about growth in their area. There are no significant differences across
regions but some differences do exist among metro markets, In Atlanta, Denver, Orlando~
Seattle, and Washington D,C. less than 40 percent ot the households have positive feelings!
compared to 57 pement in Minneapolis, 52 percent in Chicago. and 46 percent in Sacramento,
Chart 7
Q18, Your Feelings About Growth In Your Area
3o% 2, ,:.;.,. ~8%
Most Favorable (Positive} Aspects of Growth in Your Area
The top three favorable aspects of gro~.qh are growth creates jobs (54 percent)~
generates economic growth (48 percent) and bettershopping/services ¢4 percent). These
three favorable aspects of growth are the same in each of the regions and across rnetro
markets, though the order changes.
Chart 8
Q4. The Most Favorable Aspects Of Growth In Your
Area
20 30 40
Percent of Respondents
50 60
in the Nor[heast. the lop three are growth creates jobs according to 45 percent of the
respondents, provides better shopping/services (40 percent) and generates economic growth
(32 percent), whereas ~n the Midwest growth creates jobs (58 percent), generates economic
growth (52 percent} and provides better shopping/services (45 percent). A simtlar patten~ of
response exists among metro markets. Even in the high growth metro areas of Atlanta, Denver.
and Phoenix. the percent of responses indicating positive aspects are nigh. The table below
8
shows the positive aspects of growth for the national survey and compares the responses from
the metro areas.
Table 2
Most Favorable (Positive) Aspects of Growth in Your Area
Metro Area
Create Jobs Generates Economic Growth Better Shopping Services
National 54% 48% 44%
Atlanta 52 47 57
Minneapolis 44 51 38
Chicago 38 47 53
Philadelphia 35 39 46
Denver 57 50 46
Phoenix 58 47 40
Seattle 45 46 34
Washington D.C. 52 46 44
Sacramento 59 52 54
Orlando 50 45 42
Most Unfavorable (Negative) Aspects of Growth in Your Area
Heavier traffic is by far the most unfavorable aspect of growth for 79 percent of the
respondents followed by more crime (47 percent) and reduces open spaces (45 percent).
Heavier traffic is the leading negative aspect of growth across regions and metro markets. In
Atlanta, Denver, Phoenix, Orlando, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. 90 percent or more of the
respondents indicated heavier traffic to be the most unfavorable (negative) aspect of growth
compared to less than 80 percent in Minneapolis and Chicago.
9
Chart 9
Q5, The Most Unfavorable Aspects Of Growth In Your
Area
~4
Your Issues of Maior Concern
Responding to the question "if you controlled the growth of your community, which of the
following issues would be your major concerns'l, having good quality schools topped the list with
69 percent of households~ followed by reducing traffic congestion (64 percent)~ paying for
needed public improvements as growth occurs (59 percent) and protecting the environment (58
percent),
Responderos across regions and metro markets have a similar pattern of responses,
10
Chart 10
Q10, Your Issues Of Major Concern, If You Controlled
Growth Of Your Community
20 30 40 50 60 70
8O
Responsibility of Addressinq Growth Issues
Local government is responsible for addressing gro~,nth issues according to 72 percent of
households. This is followed by state government (14 percent) and the federal government (3
pement),
The responses across regions and metro markets are quite similar,
11
Chart 11
Q6, Responsibility To Address GrOFV ehrJS eS
r gv
Noneotthese a~, '?. ""E:; - "' 14%
Local govt
72%
Pen'ormance of Local Government in Manaqincl Growth
Respondents were asked to rate the performances of local government in manag~rl9
overal~ growth and preservation of open space, roads and highways, schools, crime and
environmental quality.
Managing overall growth was rated good to excellent by 27 pement! fair by 39 percent
and poor by 30 pement of the respondents.
Preservation of open space was rated as good to excellent by 31 percent, fair by 41
percent and poor by 24 percent of the respondents.
Roads and highways were rated 9ood to excellent by 37 pement, fair by 40 percent and
poor by 20 pement of the respondents.
The respondents rated schools good to excellent by 29 percent, fair by 37 percent and
poor by 29 percent of the respondents,
Crime was rated as good to excellent by 23 percent, fair by 40 pement and poor by 33
percent of the respondents.
Environmental quality was rated as good to excellent by 22 percent, fair by 47 percent
and poor by 29 pement of the respondents,
12
Chart 12
Q11. Percent of Respondents Who Rate The
Performance Of Local Govt In Managing And Dealing
With Various Aspects Of Growth As "Excellent" or
"Good"'
Schools ~ 29
127
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Trlere are some differences across census regions and motto markets in ratjog the
pedormance of tocal government io managing and dealing with different issues, Overall, growth
management by local governments was rated good to excellent by 31 pement in the West, 30
pement in the Northeast, 28 pement in the South and 21 percent in the Midwest, Local
governmenrs performance in managing overall growth was rated as good to excellent by 33
percent of the respondents in Atlanta and Seattle, and by oniy 17 percent in Minneapolis,
ADoroaches Local Government Should Take to influence Growth and Development
Plan and manage growth is the approach overwhelmingly suggested by 75 percent of
the households which local government should take to influence growth and development, Only
12 percent of the respondents suggested passing laws to restdct grow[h, The share of
13
households suggesting plan and manage growth is over 70 percent in each region and most
metre areas,
Chart 13
Q7, Approaches Local Government Should Take To
Influence Growth & Development
Le~ people use
proper~y a,s they see
growth
12%
Actions to Protect Wildlife
Act;arts to protect wi}dlife should be based on both environmental and economic
considerations according to more than 90 percent of the respondents. This is the pattern of
responses across regions and metre markets,
Chart 14
Q8. Actions To Protect Wildlife Should Be Based On
Environmental Or Economic Considerations
Only on
environmental
8%
Only on economic
considerations
14
Agreement/Disagreement with Consequences of Growth
Respondents were asked to rate their level of disagreement/agreement with different
consequences of growth on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree, and 5 = strongly agree).
About one third of the respondents disagree and one fourth agree with the statement;
"Growth is not good as it reduces open spaces". Forty four percent of the respondents neither
agree nor disagree.
Over 70 percent of the respondents agree and only 8 percent disagree with the
statement "Managed properly, growth is good for the community", and the remaining 19 percent
neither agree nor disagree.
About half of the respondents agree and 19 percent disagree with the statement "Growth
is necessary because it creates jobs", and the remaining one third neither agree or disagree.
More than one third of the respondents agree and 21 percent disagree with the
statement, "Growth is necessary because it creates tax revenues", and 41 percent neither agree
nor disagree.
About 45 percent of the respondents agree and 24 percent disagree with the statement,
"Growth brings new infrastructure", and the remaining 31 percent neither agree nor disagree.
Only 16 percent of the respondents agree and 45 percent disagree with the statement,
"Growth provides new affordable housing", and the remaining 38 percent neither agree nor
disagree.
About 39 percent of the respondents agree and 23 percent disagree with the statement,
"Growth is not good because schools get crowded", and 39 percent neither agree nor disagree.
About 57 percent of the respondents agree and 12 percent disagree with the statement,
"Growth creates air and noise pollution", and 32 percent neither agree nor disagree.
Three out of four respondents agree and only 7 percent disagree with the statement,
"Growth creates traffic problems", 18 percent neither agree nor disagree.
The level of agree/disagreement with various issues across regions and metro markets
is quite similar to responses at the national level.
15
Chart 15
Q9, Percentage of Respondents Who "Agree" or
"Strongly Agree" With Different Statements
50 60 /0
Ways to Direct Development to Meet Housind Needs Due to Growth in Households
The most preferred way to build new homes to meet housing needs due to growth in the
number ot households is "build new homes in existing, partially developed, suburban areas"
accordin9 to 44 percent of the respondents, followed by "build new homes on vacant land in the
central city or inner suburbs" (37 percent) and "build new homes in outlying areas" (20 percent),
The responses regarding the most preferred ways to direct development to meet the housing
needs across regions and me~ro markets are quite similar.
16
Table 3
Q 19, Rank The Following Ways To Direct Development To
Meet Housing Needs Due To Growth
Percent of Respondents
Second Third
Most Most Most
Preferred Preferred Preferred
Build New Homes In Existing
Partially Develeped, Suburban Areas
Build New Homes On Vacant Land
In The Central City Or inner SubuiDs
44 46 t0
37 28 35
Build New Homes In
Outtyil~g Areas
20 26 54
The Governments Zoninq and Ranninq Process Should Accommodate Expected Growth in
Nearly three out of tour respondents indicated "yes", that the 9ovemment's zomng aed
planning process should accommodate expected growth in population, 8 percent said no and 19
percent are not sure,
Chart 16
Q23. The Govt Zoning And Planning Process Should
Accommodate Expected Growth In Population
1Z
In the NortheasL 65 pement of the respondents indicated "yes", thai the governments
zoning and planning process should accommodate expected growfb in population compared to
77 percent in the South, In Atlanta, Phoenix and Orlando, 80 percent of respondents agreed,
while in Washington, D,C,, 71 percent indicated "yes".
Current Residents Should Pay for Roads. Sewers and Schools
Respondents were asked to express their sentiment toward [he staterrlenL "Other
people paid for schools, streets, and sewers before l moved in, So it's only natural for current
residents (including myself) to pay for schools, streets and sewers for those who will move into
my area in the future," About 60 percent of the respondents agree with the above statement. 36
percent disagree and the remaining 5 percent are not sure. The level of
agreement/disagreement across regions and metro markets is similar to the national responses,
Chart 17
Q20, Other People Paid For Schools, Streets, Sewers
Before I Moved In So I Should Pay For These For Those
Who Move Into My Area In The Future
Disagree s~rong'
13%
, Agtees~rongly
11%
48%
18
Who Should Pay for Roads, Sewers and Schools when a New Development ts Budff
In response To the question, "who should pay for roads, sewers and schools", 59 percorn
indicated developers, 20 percent favored atl taxpayers in the area and 21 percent favored
people who buy homes.
Chart 18
Q14, Who Should Pay For Roads, Sewers And Schools
When A New Residential Development Is Built
People who Puy
Across regions and metro markets, most respondopts indicate that developers should
pay for roads, sewers and schools when a new deveDpmers is built, though the percent of
respondents varies from 71 percent in Washington, DC to 81 percent in Atlanta,
TERMS GROWTH AND SPRAWL
What Do You Think o! When You Hear the Term Growth?
In response to the question, "What do you think when you hear the teml growth?",
positive and negative comments were offered, though more were positive, Briefly, the
comments can be summed up as follows:
Generally more positive titan negative
More opportunities, economic growth, additional jobs, new businesses, retail
businesses, more people
Diversity of people
More traffic, congestion, overcrowding
Noise and pollution
New neighborhoods, more taxes and growin9 paan8
19
What Do You Think of When You Hear the Term Sprawl?
Many respondents had not heard the term sprawl or did not know about the term,
Generally, respondents have a negative connotation with the term sprawl, Bdefiy, the
comments Can be summed up as follows:
It has negative connotations
More people, more concentrated
Traffic congestion. long commutes
Too spread out over a large area
Unplanned and haphazard growth and development
Destruction of environment
FARM LAND PRESERVATION/ESTABLISH BOUNDARIES
Favor or Oppose Laws that Prevent Farmland from BeinQ Convened to Other Uses
About 50 percent of the respondents favor laws that prevent farmland from Being
convened to other uses and 36 percent oppose such Jaws, The remaining 16 percent are not
sure,
Chart 19
Q12, Favor Or Oppose Laws That Prevent Farm Land
From Being Converted To Other Uses
Strongly o
Jaws to pl
Strongly favor laws
Unsure to preven~
16% 17%
~natfavor
prevent
H%
2O
Tltem are some regional and roefro area differences in tl3e percent of respondents
favoring or opposing laws to prevent farmland being converted to other use, In the Nor[beast,
61 percent ol the respondents favor and 36 percent oppose, whereas in the South 43 percent
lavor and 38 percent oppose such laws, In Minneapolis, 37 percent of the respondents favor
and 47 percent oppose such laws; in Philadelphia, 67 percent favor and 21 percent oppose,
Favor or Oppose Laws to Establish Boundaries that Prevent the Development of Land Outside
The Boundaries,
About half the respondents favor and one-third oppose taws to establish boundaries
around [owns and cities that prevent the development of land outside the boundaries.
Strongly oppose
laws to preven
Chart 20
Q13. Favor Or Oppose Laws To Establish Boundaries
That Prevent The Development Of Land Outside The
Boundaries
Unsure Strongly favor taws
19% to prevent
15%
Somewhat oppos,~
laws Io prevenI ' ~aws D prevent
Them are some differences, though not very significant. in responses across regions
and metro markets, JR the Northeast, 56 percent of the respondants favor and 25 percent
oppose the laws to establish boundaries to prevent the development of land outside the
boundaries, whereas in South, 42 percent favor and 38 percent oppose such taws. in
Minneapohs, 37 percent favor and 47 percent oppose compared to Philadelphia where 67
peruant favor and 21 pement oppose such taws.
21
DENSITY
Support or Oppose Sinqle Famitv Homes at a Hioher Density in Your Neiahborhood
More than throe out of four respondonto oppose and only 15 percent support building
single family homes at a higher density (smaller lots or more homes per acre) in their
neighborhood, This pattern of opposing higher density holds true across regions and me~ro
markets,
Chart 21
21, Support Or Oppose Building Single Family Homes
At A Higher Density In Your Neighborhood
Sup
12
Suppori or Oppose Multifamfiv Acar[ment Buildinas or Townhouses in Your Neiqhborhood
About 78 percent oppose building multifamily apartments and 54 percent oppose
building townhouses in their neighborhood, This opposition to building multifamily apartments
or townhouses is consistent across regions and roefro markets,
22
Chart 22
Q22a, Support Or Oppose Building Multifamily
Apartment Buildings In Your Neighborhood
Not sure., ":. ,.. ~;.:,,, , :..~ .,,~ ,. ,. i . ,., j,:,..:, :' .~, .....,
'°'" :. :. :""::'::':'~"~'!:"""""""" ~":.'~"""'
.... ...<. ,.;,,:.fi'.,z,', ,"~ .!:i,.,. ;',~ ..,. %:.,,." ""
.................. ...,.:.. ..... .............., .............; .....
Support
12%
Oppose
78%
Oppose
54%
Chart 23
Q22b, Support Or Oppose Building Townhouses In
Your Neighborhood Support
No~ s.~e
32%
SOLUTIONS TO TRAFFIC PROBLEM
Best Solution to Traffic Problems
Responding to the question regarding the best so{ution to traffic problems, 44 percent
favor widening roads followed by more public transpor{ation (33 percent) and building new
streets and roads {27 percent), About one fourth (24 pefcenD favor stopping building
development white 18 percent reported that trailic is not a problem,
23
Chat 24
Q24. The Best Solution To Trdfic Problems In Your
Widening loads ....................
More public transportation 33
Traffic is not a problem
Not sure
Building new streets ann
roads
Stop
buiiding/developrnent '
0 5 t0
2'/
124
15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Percer~t of Respondents
There are significant differences in responses across regions and roefro markets. In the
Northeast, the best solutions to traffic problem are: more public transportation (39 pement),
widening of roads (35 percent) and slopping bui]dingideveloph'n-em (31 pement). in the South!
tbe solutions are; widening roads (53 percent)! buiieing new streets and roads (33 percent) and
more public transportation (32 percent),
in the Philadelphia metro area, 39 percent preferred stopping building/development
followed by more public transportation (37 percent) and widening roads (31 percent), whereas in
Phoenix, the solutions are more public transportation (67 percent), widening roads (48 percent)
and stopping building/development (29 percent),
TRANSPORTATION PATTERNS
Access to Transportation and Transportation Used
About 47 percent of the respondents have access to bus/trolley, 17 percent car pool, 16
percent have access to train or fight raill and over 90 percent ddve their own oar, There are
24
significant differences in access to transportation across regions and metro markets. In the
Northeast, 60 percent of the respondents have access to bus/trolley compared to 66 percent in
the West and 34 percent in the South. Subway is available to 17 percent in the Northeast and
only 2 percent in the Midwest, 3 percent in the West and 6 percent in the South. Bus/trolley is
available to 35 percent of the respondents in Atlanta and over 80 percent in Denver and Seattle.
The table below shows the availability of different forms of transportation and transportation
actually used by the head of the household and another adult in the household.
Table 4
Transportation Presently Used to Commute to Work
Transportation Used By
Access to Head of Household Other Adult Member
Transportation
Drive own car 92% 85% 80%
Bus/Trolley 47% 3% 3%
Car Pool 17% 4% 3%
Train/Light rail 16% 2% 2%
Van Pool 8% 0% 0%
Subway 6% 2% 2%
Other 5% 3% 2%
Name 4% 2% 5%
Does not commute 13% 13%
to work
Even though 47 percent of the respondents have access to bus/trolley for commuting to
work, only 3 percent use it. Train or light rail is available to 16 percent of the respondents and
only 2 percent use it. Eighty-five of the respondents drive own car to work. Bus/trolley is
available to 60 percent of the respondents in the Northeast and 66 percent in the West, but only
7 percent use it in Northeast and 6 percent use it in the West. The availability of bus/trolley for
commuting to work is over 80 percent in Denver and Seattle but only 9 percent and 13 percent
of the respondents use it, respectively.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR GROWTH
Who is Responsible for Growth in Your Area?
In response to the question, 'NVho is responsible for growth in your area?", 58 percent
indicated local government followed by builder/developer (52 percent), elected officials (42
25
percent) and community leaders (37 percent), Only 24 percent of the respondents indicated
Ihat homebuyers are responsible lot growth in their area, There are no significattt differences in
responses across regions and metre markets,
Chart 25
Q25. Who Is Responsible For Growth In Your Area?
IMPROVE/PRESERVE ENVIRONMENT
What Should Builders and Developers do to Help improve/Preserve Environment?
In response te the question, "What in your opinion should builders/developers do to help
improveipresep-,e the environment?", 88 percent indicated that builders/developers should build
more energy efficient homes and equip them with energy saving appliances. That was followed
by leave or plant as many trees as possible (87 percent), protect environmentally sensitive
areas, e.g., wellands (87 percent), preseNe wildlife habitat (59 percent), and make greater use
of recycled rnatenals (57 percent), Only 20 percent of the respondents ind~cated preseNe open
spaces by clustering development.
There are no significant differences in responses across regions and metro markets.
26
Chart 26
Q30. What Should Builders Do To Help
Improve/Preserve The Environment?
Protectenwronmentallysensitiveareas ~65
Preserve wildlife habitat :23 :: !:::: :: :!:~:2:::::: 159
house
Presenze open space by clustering deve~opment ~20
Other g 3
0 10 20
30 40 50 60 70 80
Percent of Respondents
90 100
PLAN TO BUY A HOME
Ran to Bu_V.._a..._H.~..e..~(.n.....N..~:~.2T~y)p..2:(.~'
About 16 percent of tile respondGrits p!an to buy a home in next two years. While there
were some differences in responses across the regions, there were significant differences in
responses across metre areas.
27
Chart 27
Q35a. Plan To Buy A Home In The Next Two Years
NOt sure Yes
17% 16%
': ............. =' ~:I '' ~ ·, '; ~ :~
.. . ........ ...... .-,
,.,....
: ~.~ :....,..,.,,',;, ,.j, ;: ',,,:, ,',,,.:,.. ,.',.. !,.! .:.. , '.,~,;~
, ', "" ~ :.:, ' :..' :~ ', ..' "2 .' .' :" "' "" ' ~?"' .' .; ' '.: ,~.
No
67%
About 13 percent of the respendents in the Midwest plan to buy a home in the rlex~ 2
years compared to 16 percent in the South, 17 pement in the Northeast and 19 percent in the
West, Only 16 pement of the respondents in Minneapolis, Denver and Orlando plan to buy a
home in the next 2 years but tl~e response was a high 33 percent in Atlanta.
Type of Home You Will Buy
More than ene fourth (29 percent) of the responden[s who pan to buy a home dunng the
next 2 years will buy a new home and 42 percent will lady an existing home, Tl~e remaining 29
percent are not sure,
Chart 28
Q35b. Type Of Home You Will Buy
i,"?,"' :,':'.' :'¥.':',.';:i~
.... "'~; ' "":;", :: "'.: ,,'~ ' '.' ' 'U' ,". ~' ,," ". ?' ~:~";~.~.'; ~ "~~:,'e:.:".~ .~,'~. "";: ,' :'::.;.;.'¥,:..:,'.L', ,..':,:j'~,.~'-:..""'i
: :i:~':,.:? "77::':'~"':" :"""' :. ,~
28
There are significant differences across metre markets for the type of home respondents
will buy, In the Northeast, only 18 pement said that they plan to buy a new home compared to
21 pement in the Midwest, 27 percent in the West and 38 percent in the South, Among motto
markets, 21 percent in Minneapolis plan to buy a new home and this rises to 32 percent in
Orlando and Chicago,
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
Type of Present Home
Eighty-one pement of the households responding to the survey live in a single family
detached home and five pement live in a single family attached home, Only nine percent of the
respondents live in an apartment in a multifamily building and four percent live in a toobib
home, Nationally, among nit households in the country, 63 percent live in a single family
detached uniL 10 pement live in an attached unit, 21 percent ~ive in a multifamily umt, and 6
pement live in a mobile home,
Chart 29
Q26a. Which Type Of Home Do You Currently Live In?
Other {0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
80 90
There are some regional and metro market differences in responses regarding the type
of home respondents presently live m, In the Northeast, 72 percent of the households
responding live in a single family detached unit, 20 percent live in a multifamily unit, and seven
pement iive in a townhouse, whereas in the South, 82 percent live in a single family detached
29
unit, five percent in a townhousel and six percent in an apartment in a multifamily building In
Atlanta 82 percent live in a singte family detached unit. 3 percent in a townhouse, and 11
pement in an apartment in a multifamily building. In Washington D.C., 67 percent live in a single
family detached unit, 21 percent live in a townhouse and 10 percent live in an apartment or
muitifamily building.
Type of Home Preferred
Eighty-eight pement of the household respondents prefer to live in a single family
detached home, six percent in a townhouse, and two pement in an apartment in a multifamily
building,
Chart 30
Q26b, What Type Of Home Would You Prefer?
Mobile home ~3
O~her
0 ~0 20 30
40 50 60 70 80
Percent of Respondents
90 100
There are some differences in responses regarding the type of borne in which
respondents would like to bye across regions and roefro markets. In the Northeast, 86 pement
of the households prefer to live in a single family detached unit followed by a townhouse (10
percent.), and an apartment in a multifamily building (4 percent). In Atlanta, 91 pement prefer to
live in a single family detached home, 5 pement in a townhouse, and 1 percent in an apartment
jn a multifamily building and in Philadelphia, 83 percent prefer to live in a single family detached
uniL 10 percent in a townhouse and 5 percent in an apartment or multifamily building.
30
Prefer a Townhouse in the City or a Sinqle Family Detached Home in the Suburbs
Respondents were asked to consider the following hypothetical choice: "Your income is
high enough ~o purchase a $150,000 home. You have two options: buying a $150,000
townhouse in an urban setting dose to public transportation, work, and shopping. Or, you could
purchase a larger, detached single family home in an outlying suburban area, with longer
distances to work, public transportation, and shopping. Which option would you choose? A
$150,000 townhouse in the city or a $150,000 detached home in an outlying suburban area?"
Eighty-three percent preferred a $150,000 deached unit in a suburban area.
Chart 31
Q27. Prefer To Purchase A $150K Townhouse In The
City Or Detached Home In Suburbs 150KTOWnlIOUSe ~n
"' '
A detached home in the suburbs is the choice for 87 percent of households in the South,
83 percent in the Midwest, 81 percent in the Northeast, and 78 percent in the West. Among the
ten metre markets, a single family detached home in the suburbs is preferred by 81 percent in
Sacramento, Los Angeles, and Phoenix, 80 percent in Chicago, and 70 percent in Washington,
D,C,, and Seattle.
importance of Different Factors if You Were to Buy a New Home Todal
Respondents were asked to rate the importance of 11 different factors as very imponanL
somewhat imporiaet! not important, and not sure. Crime rate was rated as very important by 84
percent. ~oltowed by quality of commumty or neighoorhood (82 percent), price of home (?9
percent), and size and features el home (68 percent). Convenience to pubhc transportation was
rated as very important only by 10 percent of the respondents and highway access had a 23
percent rating,
Chart 31
Q28. Percentage of Respondents Who Rate These
Factors Of Buying A New Home As "Very Important"
Clime Rate ~'~'~ ' ~tf~t~~ ~' '~~~~ '~~~'~~,,~,':'~8}~J~ 84
Size Of Lot ~~~t 59
Location To Shopping ~20
' i
Convel lient To Pubtic Transportation ~ 10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Percent of Responderos
impor[ance of different factors across census regions and metro markets followed a
s~milar pattern. Crime rate, quality of community or neighborhood, and price of home were the
top three factors in each of the census regions and metro markets, The table below compares
the top three factors across regions and rnetro markets.
32
Table 5
Importance of different factors if you were to buy a new home
(Percent ranking very important)
Crime rate Quality of Price of Home
Community/Neighborhood
Total 84% 82% 79%
Northeast 82% 79% 81%
Midwest 78% 77% 76%
South 88% 85% 80%
West 82% 85% 78%
Metro Areas
Atlanta 90% 84% 78%
Minneapolis 81% 81% 79%
Chicago 86% 85% 83%
Philadelphia 87% 82% 83%
Denver 77% 72% 75%
Phoenix 88% 89% 82%
Orlando 91% 81% 75%
Seattle 76% 73% 75%
Washington, D.C. 80% 82% 71%
Sacramento 83% 84% 72%
Prepared to Accept in a Home to Make it More Affordable
In response to the question, ~lf you cannot afford to buy the house you want, what would
you be prepared to accept to make it more affordable to you ," farther away from shopping and
entertainment and unfinished spaces were the top 2 choices with 58 percent of the respondents,
followed by a smaller house (42 percent) and a longer commute to work (40 percent).
33
Chart 33
Q31, If You Cannot Afford To Buy The Home You Want
What Would You Accept To Make It More Affordable
Farther away from chopping and entertainment remains the number one or two method
to make the home more affordable across the census regions and the metro markets. The table
below shows the top three ways to make homes more affordable across metro markets,
34
Table 6
Prepared to Accept in a Home to Make it More Affordable
(Percent of respondents)
Farther away from Unfinished spaces you
shopping/entertainment could Finish
Total 58% 58%
Northeast 58% 61%
Midwest 57% 64%
South 61% 56%
West 54% 54%
Metro Markets
Atlanta 65% 65%
Minneapolis 55% 78%
Chicago 51% 61%
Philadelphia 45% 59%
Denver 59% 72%
Phoenix 66% 48%
Orlando 60% 40%
Seattle 55% 64%
Washington, D.C. 47% 68%
Sacramento 56% 50%
Community Amenities that Would Seriously Influence You to Move
Highway access and park areas are the top two amenities that would seriously influence
55 percent and 51 percent of the respondents, respectively, to move to a new community. They
are followed by walking/jogging trails (48 percent), and lakes (38 percent).
35
Chart:34
Q32~ Which Of The Following Amenities Would Seriously
Infiuerx:e You To Move To A New Community Realizing That
There are no significant regional or metro marke~ differences ~n the amenities that would
seriously influence respondents to move.
Features You Would Look for in Choosing Your Next Home
A more energy efficient home is the number one featu re respondents would look for if
buyin9 a home (69 percent). This is followed by tess traffic (42 percent), a bigger house (42
percent), recluced exterior maintenance (38 percent), and a bigger tot (35 percent),
36
Srnaj[erhouse ~11
Chart 35
Q33, Features You Would Look For In Choosing Your
Next Home
38
30 40 50 60 70 80
The pattern of responses for features which homebuyers would like across regions and
metro markets is quite similar,
Things You Would Support to Make Housincl More Affordable
Respondents' opinions regarding things they would support to make housing more
affordable in their area was divided. About onesthird of the respondents indicated none, 29
percent would support providing government assistance to homebuyers and 31 percent would
suppot' the use of a flexible approach to protecting the environment
37
Chart 36
Q29, Would Support To Make Housing More Affordable
In Your Area
Useotafiexibieapproachloprotectin~the
Efiminasng excessive buffdrag codes and regulations ~23
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
There are some differences, though not very significant~ ~n the responses supperling
various things to make housing more affordable across regions and motto markets. In the
Northeast 40 percent would support providing government assistance to homebuyers and
renters, followed by the use of a flexible approach to protect the environment. th the Midwes~
24 pement would support providing government assistance to homebuyers and rentors and 27
percent would support the use of a flexible approach to protect the environment. In Atlanta 28
percent would support providing government assistance to homebuyers and renters and 34
percent would support the use of a flexible approach to protect the environment. in Denver 30
percent would support providing government assistance to homebuyers and rentors and 26
percent would Support the use of a flexible approach to protect the environmenL
38
RESPONDENT'S PROFILE
Family Composition
Two out of three households are comprised of a husband and wife with or without
children, Another 19 percent are single. (male or female) and ten percent are single, with
children,
Chart 37
Family Composition
Single male
7%
Female with
nonrelative
2%
child/relative , Unmarried ma~e,
7% present
68%
Aqe of Head of Household
About 17 pement of the heads of household responding are 25~34 years of age, 29
percent are 35-44 years old, and 32 pement are 45*54 years old. The remaining 22 pement are
55 years and older, The median age of the head of Household is 46,6 years,
39
Chart 38
Age of the Head of the Household
25 to 34 yrs Of age
55 and eider ! 7%
45 10 54 yrs C ~ "'"; ........ ~ .....~ ,'sot age
32% 29%
Household Income
About 29 percent of the households responding to the sun, ey have income of over
$75,000 and another 31 percem have income or S50,000-$75,000, The remainin9 40 percent
have ncome of less than $50,000, The median income of households responding to the suNey
is $58,064,
Chart 39
Household Income
$100,0O0 or higher
14% $25,000 to $34,999
17%
875,000 ....... . ....
o $49,999
23%
4O
Year Your Home Was Bufit
More than one-third of the respondents are living in homes built in 1980 or later, 20
percent are ~n homes built in the 1970s, and 14 percent are in homes built in the 1960s, The
remaining 31 percent are living in homes built before t960,
Chart 40
Q34a. Year Your Home Was Built
~970to1979 [~.2: ......... J20
Year Your Neiohborhood Was Built
About one~fou r{h of the respondents are from neighborhoods built in 1980 or later, 18
percent from the 1970s and 12 percent from the 1960s, The remaining 48 percent live in
neighborhoods built before 1960,
Chart 41
Q34b, Year Your Neighborhood Was Built
Reqistered Voters
Ninety three percent of the respondents are registered voters, 7 percent are not,
Chart 42
Q37. Respondents Who Are Registered Voters
Yes
93%
42
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
June/l~',; 1999
IP1
IP2
IP3
IP4
IP5
IP6
JUNE 28 WORK SESSION ITEMS
Memorandum from Economic Development Coordinator: Request for Property Tax
Exemption for Project on the Former Whiteway Site [City Manager response included
in Council packet]
Memorandum from Planning and Community Development Director: Peninsula Project
Memorandum from City Manager: Highland Avenue
Letter from Francis and Janet Driscoll to City Manager: Highland Avenue Islands [City
Manager response included in Council packet]
Memorandum from City Manager: City Park Amusement Rides
Memorandum from City Manager: Water Treatment Plant/Project Labor Agreement
IP7
IP8
IP9
IP10
IPll
IP12
IP13
IP14
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
Memorandum from City Manager: Pending Development Issues
Memorandum from City Attorney: Absence
Memorandum from Senior Planer: Planning and Zoning Commission Work Program
Pending List
Memorandum from Purchasing Agenda to Assistant City Manager: Rotation Method for
3-Year Towing Contract
Release: Deer Line
Release: Yard Waste Stickers Now on Sale
Article: How Suburban Design is Failing Teen-Agers [Franklin]
Agendas: June 21, 22, and 24 JC Board of Supervisors
Agenda for the June 29 Board of Supervisors.
Information distributed by Moen regarding Whiteway reinvestment options
( property tax ).
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
06-28-99
IP1
Date: June 24, 1999
To:
From:
City Manager & City Council
David Schoon, Economic Development Coordinat~-~-~~CL"",,,~._
Re: Request for Property Tax Exemption for Project on the Former Whiteway Site
The City Council has received a request for property tax exemption for a project to be
constructed on the former Whiteway building site. The purpose of the memo is to outline
what Chapter 404 of the State Code allows a city to provide in terms of property tax
exemption,
Urban Revitalization Law
Chapter 404 of the State Code allows a city to designate an area of a community as an
urban revitalization area for the purpose of granting property tax exemption for qualifying
projects. An area may be designated an urban revitalization area under one of four criteria:
1) slum; 2) blight; 3) historic preservation; or 4) economic development. Given that one
would be hard pressed to argue that the downtown is an area of slum and blight and given
that the project consists of constructing a new building rather than preserving or restoring
a building of historical or architectural significance, the most appropriate designation may
fall under the economic development criteria.
Economic Development Criteria
Chapter 404 defines an economic development area as:
an area of a municipality designated by the local governing body as appropriate for
commercial and industrial enterprises, public improvements related to housing and
residential development, or construction of housing and residential development for
low and moderate-income families, including single or multifamily housing.
The downtown area could be designated an economic development area appropriate for
commercial enterprises, public improvements related to housing and residential
development or the construction of housing for low and moderate income families. Such
designation should be consistent with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and
other City policies. The attached letter dated June 23 to Monica Moen outlines recent City
Council policy and actions regarding the use of property tax exemption in an area adjacent
to downtown, the Near Southside.
Property Tax Exemption for the Proposed Project
If Council determines that it would be in the public's interest to designate a portion of the
downtown area an urban revitalization economic development area, one then needs to look
at how property tax exemption could be used for the proposed project. If designated an
economic development area, the commercial component of the structure could qualify for
property tax exemption. In order for the housing component of the project to qualify for
property tax exemption, the housing must be for low and moderate-income families. The
urban revitalization law defines low and moderate income families as "those families,
including single person households, earning no more than eighty percent of the higher of
the median family income of the county or the statewide nonmetropolitain area as
determined by the latest U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Section 8
income guidelines." Only that portion of the building housing low and moderate-income
families would qualify for property tax exemption. In discussions with staff, the developer
has indicated that the housing units in the project would be market rate housing though
the developer has indicated that they may consider including some units that would be
affordable to low and moderate income families. In order to define the project as a
housing development for low and moderate-income families, it would not be unreasonable
to expect that at least half of the project's units would be for low and moderate-income
families.
If the City Council determines that it is in the public interest to grant property tax
exemption for this project, the developer will then need to submit for staff review a pro
forma and other financial documentation demonstrating that the project requires property
tax exemption to make the project financially feasible. During this review, the developer
and staff will determine what may be the most appropriate and permissible abatement
schedule under State law. Upon staff's review of this information, we will present our
recommendations regarding the project's need for property tax exemption.
Cc: Karin Franklin
Monica Moen
F:\downtown\cdbd\ccomoen.doc
June 23,1999
Transmitted via fax: (208) 345-3514
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
Monica Moen
1101 West River Street Ste. 200
PO Box 959
Boise, ID 83701-0959
Dear Monica:
Time has been scheduled on the City Council's Monday, June 28 Work Session agenda for you
to address the Council regarding your desire to be granted property tax exemption for your
proposed commercial/residential building on the former Whiteway building site. Discussion at
the formal meeting seemed premature at this point. Please call on Monday, June 28 and Karin
can give you an idea when your item is scheduled. The agenda for that evening is very full, so I
imagine the City Council will want to stay as close as possible to schedule.
As a follow-up to David Schoon's phone conversation with you at the beginning of May, I would
like to reiterate staff's position regarding the granting of property tax exemption for your project.
This position is based on recent City Council policy regarding the granting of property tax
exemption under Chapter 404, Urban Revitalization, of the Code of Iowa. In October of 1994,
the City Council adopted two urban revitalization plans for the Near Southside area. The
purpose of the plans is to encourage redevelopment of this area for specific uses. The Near
Southside Residential Urban Revitalization Plan targets the redevelopment of a portion of the
Near Southside for housing for low and moderate income households as defined by the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Section 8 income guidelines. For a
redevelopment project to qualify, the residential component of the building must be
predominately for low and moderate-income households. Based on our conversations with you,
your proposed project is predominately, if not exclusively, market rate housing.
The Near Southside Commercial Urban Revitalization Plan targets the redevelopment of a
different portion of the Near Southside for office and retail development. For a redevelopment
project to qualify for property tax exemption, the retail/office component of the building must
occupy three stories of the building. The goal in this area is to redevelop sites for predominately
commercial uses rather than for residential uses. It is staff's understanding that your project will
consist of only one story of commercial and four or five stories of residential uses.
I believe the City Council will use these policies for the Near Southside as a guide for any tax
exemption policy in the downtown. Consistent with those policies and our treatment of similar
projects to yours in the downtown, the staff cannot find a rationale for tax exemption for your
project.
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 · (319) 356-5000 , FAX (319) 356-5009
Monica Moen
June 23,1999
Page 2
Though City policy may not support the granting of property tax exemption for your proposed
project, the City is extremely supportive of your efforts to redevelop the site.
Sincerely,
City Manager
Cc: City Council
Karin Franklin
David Schoon
F:\downtown\cdbdVnoenO623,doc
06/16/99 11:22 8208 345 3514 EVANS E:A_N~ ~002/002
Monica Moen
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Monica Moon [ekmonica@micron.net]
Tuesday, June 15, 1999 8:27 AM
'marlan_karr(~iowacity.org'
'mmoen@uiowa.campuscwix.net'
FW: Council Agenda Item - June 29 meeting
--Original Message--
From: Monlca Moon [mallto:el<mo,~ioa micron.net]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 9:57 A~
To: 'madan_karri~iowac~ .orcJ'
Cc: 'mmoen~iowa .campuscw,y.ner
Subject: Council AVerde Item - June 29 meeting
Hi Madanl
Marc and I would like the opportunity to speak with the Council at its June 29 meeting. Here is proposed
language for the agenda:
The owners of the former Whiteway Building are contemplating building a new commercial and residential
structure at 210-216 South Clinton Street, the site of the former Whiteway Building that was destroyed by tire on March
26, 1999. The Moons request consideration of a proposal for phasing in the increase in property taxes that will occur as a
result of construction of a new building on the site. The Moens request an incremental phase-in of 20 percent of the
increase in the assessed value of the property value over a five year period. That is, once the competed building is
assessed, the increase over the January 1999 assessment would be paid in an increment of 20 percent the first year, 40
percent the second year, etc.. so that at the end of the fi~h year. the increase in the property taxes would be fully phased
in. Since only the increase in assessed value would be subject to the phase-in. there would be no loss, but only gain, in
revenue to the City. The 1999 assessment on the former building (excluding land) was $580, 980. The building which
the Moons propose to construct would be well in excess of a bur-fold increase in the 1999 assessed value of the former
Whiteway Building. To accomplish this. the Moons need assistance in the form of the proposed property tax phase-in.
Please let either Marc or me know if you need additional information, Marc's phone number is 351-3900 and my
daytime number is (208) 384-1800. I will let either you or Sue know ahead of time if we will be needing any special
equipment for the meeting, rll stop in the office on Monday, June 28 to say hello. I hope all is well. I look fortNard to
seeing yoU.
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 24, 1999
City Council
Karin Franklin, Director,
Peninsula Project
As you know, we received only one development proposal from the three developers chosen to
continue with this project after the Request for Qualifications (RFQ). We have been working with
this single developer to achieve a proposal which we believe will build the neighborhood
envisioned in our Peninsula plan. After receiving a response to some of our questions about the
original submittal, we believe more work will be needed to come to agreement with this
developer on how to execute our plan successfully. Consequently, we would like to create
another opportunity to look at this proposal in the context of competitive proposals.
We are aware of throe or four developers who continue to be, or have become, interested in this
project and would submit a proposal if requested. These are individuals who have roconfigured
more desirable teams from initial responses to the RFQ or who have learned about this project
after our previous deadline. Since our intent from the beginning was to have a number of
proposals to comparo and evaluate, we would like to reopen this competition and request
proposals from selected developers who have expressed an interest in this project and who
have experience in this type of development. It is our hope that Mr. McCabe would continue to
be part of the competition so that we can comparo his proposal to others.
Given the timeline of the Foster Road project, we have sufficient time to go back out for
proposals and not delay the actual construction of the Peninsula project. With the Council's
approval, we would mail requests for proposals to selected developers by mid-July. These
proposals would be due by December 15th; reviewed in January; have a public presentation in
February; and the preferred developer would be selected in Maroh, 2000. The Foster Road
project should be completed by June, 2001. The developer would have approximately one year
from the date of selection to finalize plans, complete a development agreement with the City,
and obtain all necessary approvals and permits.
I would like to discuss this strategy with the City Council Monday, June 28, 1999 at the work
session.
cc: City Manager
Jeff Davidson
Bob Miklo
ppddir\memos\penproj .doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 23, 1999
To: City Council
From: City Manager
Re: Highland Avenue
On Friday, June 18 I met with staff representing Planning, Public Works, Fire and the City
Attorney. This meeting was called in order to discuss the traffic calming features recently
installed on Highland Avenue. We all had received numerous calls concerning this issue,
and the staff, collectively, raised a number of concerns to me.
This matter had reached such negative proportions that it was reflecting badly on
the City organization, City Council and on the general decision making process used
for determining the need for installation of traffic control devices.
The City is immune from liability for claims based on negligent design and
construction of a street, only if the design and construction is "in accordance with a
generally recognized engineering or safety standard criteria, or design theory in
existence at the time of construction." The opinion of our City engineers and
planners are important in determining whether this standard has been met. Although
political decisions may be made that are contrary to the advice of your professional
staff, the legal standard remains the same.
Although the design of the original chicanes and chokers were done in accordance
with generally accepted standards for such devices, the City Council chose to
"shave off" a portion apparently in order to promote more convenient less
restrictive traffic movements.
Parking restrictions were added to improve the flow of traffic. We now have
neighbors criticizing these restrictions and complaining of inconvenience, the very
same type of complaint we have received from non-resident motorists using
Highland.
The side streets in the area have experienced increased traffic from the perspective
of those residents, contrary to the basic principles of traffic calming.
Residents of the area are concerned about public safety response to their possible
emergency needs.
7. Overall, the staff also experienced concerns for the future of traffic calming.
Although traffic calming is a new and somewhat innovative practice, we have strived to
make sure that all of our Iowa City projects are well designed within acceptable
engineering standards, and responsive to the neighborhood petitioning for such traffic
Highland Avenue
June 23, 1999
Page 2
calming, while attempting to satisfy other users of the particular street in question. Traffic
calming devices that were installed are by their very nature designed to disrupt traffic,
change driver behavior, and thereby slow vehicles down. This certainly seems to have
been successful on Highland. However, it appears that on Highland Avenue these chicanes
and chokers are so unexpected on a street with 2,200 vehicles per day that motorists are
having a difficult time adjusting and we question whether they ever will. The overwhelming
response from the public measured in the form of correspondence and telephone calls has
been in my judgment intensely negative. Not only do they complain about Highland, but
also the complaints now bring into question our whole history of traffic in the area.
Notably complaints about Kirkwood being inadequately designed for its traffic volume and
traffic control measures (stop signs) used inappropriately.
You will recall that when the neighborhood traffic calming program was established, staff
recommended that collector streets not be included in the program. There was significant
neighborhood opposition to this staff position, and you ultimately decided that traffic
calming on collector streets would be permitted. A rule was in place that collector streets
would be considered for traffic calming as long as the street had a traffic count of less
than 3,000 vehicles per day. We now question 3,000 vehicles per day as being too high a
standard. We believe that Highland Avenue represents a situation whereby traffic calming
on a collector street has led to significant public difficulty in even understanding the
concept, let alone accepting it. Our traffic calming has been done as an experiment to be
evaluated periodically, and we feel that Highland Avenue has simply become a successful
failure. By any measure of public opinion the immediate neighborhood, that is those
properties fronting on Highland, may be satisfied but there seems to be few others.
Besides the overwhelming negative response, we also observe a traffic diversion occurring
onto other local streets in this area. As stated, this was not intended to be a result of the
traffic calming project. Much of the diversion is a result of decisions that were made on
Kirkwood Avenue. We have been reminded of that frequently through the complaints
received. We are concerned that as Highland becomes a permanent traffic feature and
other streets take on more traffic, the complaint will become Kirkwood an(t Highland.
The whole traffic calming concept is difficult in that we must balance subjective
neighborhood quality issues with technical engineering and other legal responsibilities. The
engineering profession must design streets to move traffic as efficiently and safely as
possible. The notion of traffic calming would seem to be antagonistic to the engineering
profession because it introduces inefficiencies into the street system. The balance between
the worthwhile goals for neighborhood quality and travel efficiency raises difficult political
questions.
This is made all the more difficult in the face of our developing community tradition that
neighbors expect councils to vote the particular interest of the neighborhood. We have
built many public services on this neighborhood political process. There are times,
however, that the parochial interest of the neighborhood must be evaluated and considered
in light of overall community good. Departments involved feel in the Highland Avenue
project that the initial response from the public and the re-engineered features by way of a
vote of the City Council does cause significant concern. We believe there are other options
such as parking and speed enforcement which may be called upon to address the issues
associated with Highland Avenue. We would request that 1) the chokers and chicanes be
removed from Highland Avenue; 2) consider amending our procedures and policies
Highland Avenue
June 23, 1999
Page 3
associated with traffic calming on collector streets; 3) we would suggest that on-street
parking on both sides of Highland Avenue might create side friction and thereby moderate
speed on this street; and 4) direct that increased police enforcement of the speed limit.
cc: Jeff Davidson
Eleanor Dilkes
Rick Fosse
Chuck Schmadeke
Andy Rocca
Doug Ripley
rngr~memos\highlan~l.doc
1409 Spruce St.
Iowa City, IA 52240
June 13, 1999
Stephen Atkins, City Manager
410 E Washington St.
Iowa City, IA 52240
06-28-99
IP4
RE: Highland Ave. Islands
Dear Mr. Arkins:
Having lived on Spruce St., three houses south of Highland Ave., for over 25 years, we use Highland Ave. daily when
traveling across the south side of town. There has been some concern about vehicles traveling at high speeds in this
residential neighborhood and have noticed the newly constructed islands on Highland. These islands bring many
concerns to mind:
· Will ~ere be any loss of valuable response time of emergency vehicles, including fire trucks and anlbu lances, with
reduced speeds required to navigate around these islands? Have these depamnents been consulted in this matter?
Will drivers be able to determine where these islands are following a new snowfall and prior to snow removal.
How well will snow plows be able to clear the street? Will these islands and potential snow piles create visual
obstructions for drivers?
Will on-street parking be allowed to continue? This presents another obstacle.
· Will refuse vehicles block the street on pick-up day?
· Will them be a safety issue with cars and bicycles maneuvering around islands?
· With the elementary school nearby and many children walking and biking to school, will these islands ereate a
street-crossing problem? and a visual obstruction?
· There are elderly persons living in this neighborhood as well, will these islands create a ha Ta rd for them both
walking and driving?
· With the City' s new interest in neighborhood meetings and public feedback was there a meeting about this issue?
We realize this may be an experimental solution to traffic problems and offer the above comments in this light.
However, we feel it is the City' s respons~ility to provide safe, barrier free streets that move traffic safely and timely
and not create additional obstacles and hazards to our streets.
We invite you to travel Highland Ave. during the day, between 4:00 and 6:00 P.M., and again at dusk when resident' s
cars are parked on the street. Thank you for your attention on this issue.
Francis and Janet Driscoll ~~ ~'~
June 22,1999
Francis & Janet Driscoll
1409 Spruce Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Driscolh
Thank you for your timely and thoughtful letter concerning the installation of the traffic control
devices on Highland Avenue. As I am sure you are aware by now, the City Council has
discussed this matter extensively and have a vadety of opinions as to whether the islands are
the means by which to address the Highland Avenue residents' traffic concerns.
Just to give you a bit of history, some Highland Avenue area residents approached the City
Council concerning speeding and traffic volumes on their street. Meetings were held to discuss
their concerns. The chicanes and chokers (the islands along Highland Avenue) have become a
means to address these issues although not used extensively. Whether motorists find them
acceptable as in any change in traffic control will require further evaluation.
I will do my best to respond to each of the specific items you identified.
With respect to the loss of emergency vehicle response time, our fire and police vehicles have
driven the area and determined they can navigate these islands satisfactorily. Of course, this
assumes drivers will yield in response to the lights/sirens as they are required to do so by law.
Will they be slower in response - I would say the answer is a qualified yes. Our emergency
personnel operate with strict policies such as their speed on various streets and in
neighborhoods. It is difficult to determine exactly what the reduction if any in response time
might be.
The issue of determining how we will navigate with our snowplows is one which we will just
simply have to wait and see. Our snow plow drivers are usually very familiar with their particular
route and we try to keep the same personnel on snow routes throughout the winter season for
this familiarity. This should help in the removal of snow as well as assure safe operations. The
snow piles which would occur on the islands I would believe are not substantially different than
the snow piles that might occur at the parkway. Until we have had experience, I will have to
reserve judgment on the effectiveness of our snow removal effort.
The issue of on-street parking restrictions is currently underway. I would agree that the on-street
parking does provide another obstacle and we will need to restrict parking in and around the
choker/chicanes in order to provide for reasonably safe movement.
Refuse collection vehicles will block a street on pick up day, but I would suspect it would be of
very short duration as our crews generally work rather quickly in order to move through their
routes and avoid such blockages.
Is there a possibility of a safety issue with cars and bicycles maneuvering around the islands? I
would believe the answer is yes. If the vehicle, whether it be car or bicycle, is operated in a
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240-1826 · (319) 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-5009
Francis & Janet Driscoll
June 22, 1999
Page 2
responsible fashion, it should be minimalized. The street has had its share of speeding and will
need further police attention.
Will the islands create a street crossing problem and visible obstruction? My instincts would say
that the children crossing the street might, in fact, have some degree of additional safety in that
they can step up on this choker/chicane as they cross the street. As a parent, I have seen the
habits of children; it is difficult to predict, but certainly that is something that will have to be
followed carefully. Slowing traffic may be viewed as a desirable response and thereby
increasing the margin of safety.
With respect to the elderly living in the neighborhood and whether it creates a hazard walking
and driving, there is no evidence that would indicate so. Those driving have an obligation to
operate their vehicles in a safe fashion regardless of age.
As far as public feedback and neighborhood meetings, there were several meetings at which
City staff persons, and I know of Council work sessions, where this matter was discussed.
I will again reiterate that this matter is subject to review by City Council Members. They are
receiving numerous phone calls on both sides of the issue. As far as my own experience, I have
driven the neighborhood on several occasions at several times of the day, so I am familiar with
the situation.
Thank you for your time and interest.
Sincerely,
City Manager
CO:
City Council
Doug Ripley
Jeff Davidson'
Andy Rocca
Chuck Schmadeke
indexbc\ltrs\4-4SA.doc
Date:
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
June 21, 1999
To: City Council
From: City Manager
Re: City Park Amusement Rides
Guy Drollinger, owner and operator of the amusement rides in lower City Park, has informed the
Director of Parks & Recreation that this will be the last year of his family's operation of the rides.
He indicated he feels badly about discontinuing this operation because it has been in the family
for 47 years and has become somewhat of an "institution" in City Park. They have decided to
give it up largely because they spend 10-12 hours a day, seven days a week, six months of the
year working the rides and do not make much money, considering the time involved.
We have been asked if the City might be interested in acquiring the train ride and possibly the
carousel in order to continue some of the tradition in the park. He indicated that he doesn't know
at this time the exact value of these two rides, but he estimated them to be in the area of
$40,000 each.
Terry discussed this with the Parks & Recreation Commission informally at their June 9
meeting. The Commission has indicated an interest in pursuing this possibility. They recognize,
of course, the fact that a good deal of research needs to be done yet, but conceptually they are
in favor.
If we were to acquire these two rides, one possibility may be to get the service clubs involved
and initiate a "save the train and carousel campaign." It has also been mentioned that perhaps a
capital project could be undertaken to extend the railroad tracks throughout the park (or a
portion of it).
If we were to take over the operation, either directly or indirectly, I would foresee it not being a
full-time operation as it has been in the past, but more likely evenings and weekends only or
some combination thereof.
In a recent conversation with Terry, Mr. Drollinger indicated that it might be easier to sell the
entire operation to another vendor. If he decides to do this, then we will have to make a decision
as to whether or not we choose to work with another vendor or discontinue the operation in City
Park. The Drollingers are under a time crunch since this is the right time of year to begin
advertising such items for sale. We have asked them not to do anything just yet until we have a
chance to make a final determination as to whether or not the City is interested in acquiring the
train ride and carousel and retaining them in the park. We indicated to them that we do not
believe the City would be interested in acquiring the entire operation.
I would like to get an indication from you as to whether or not you have an interest, before
spending much time in developing concepts for community involvement, operating procedures,
insurance, liability, acquisition costs, operating costs, revenue potential, expansion and
development costs, etc.
The Drollingers would like to proceed with their plans as quickly as possible, so I would
appreciate receiving direction from the City Council in the near future. I plan to place this item
on your work session agenda for June 28.
bc\memos\l -1 SA.doc ~~~/~1 '
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 23, 1999
City Council
City Manager
Water Treatment Plant Project/Project Labor Agreement
Attached is a copy of a letter from area labor unions and a proposed resolution requiring a
project labor agreement (PLA) for our bidders/contractors for the upcoming water plant project.
These PLAs are a type of collective bargaining agreement often used on large, private
construction projects. They are now more actively considered for public construction projects
and can serve as the standard for labor relations by creating uniform terms and conditions of
employment; dispute resolution and other working conditions. The case for a project laborer
agreement is often made due to the vulnerability of construction delay - work stoppages - by
any one of a number of multiple trades which may be working on a padicular project. The
availability of a labor supply is also often addressed in a PLA.
Those that oppose the concept of PLAs would challenge them as being anti-competitive;
minority businesses are concerned about an inability to share in the public's business; and open
shop contractors would be required to restructure their operations.
If the requirement for a PLA is a matter of your policy interest, extensive research as the
Assistant City Attorney's memo outlines will be needed. Before we proceed to undertake the
research as well as determine whether we wish to incorporate into our upcoming bidding
documents I will need your policy guidance.
This matter will be on your work session agenda for June 28.
Attachment
jwlrnem/sa-water.doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 7, 1999
Steve Atkins, City Manager
Sarah E. Holecek, First Assistant City Attorney ~~
Legal concerns associated with Project Labor Agreements
You have asked that this office briefly review the potential legal issues involved in the City
requiring all parties successfully bidding on city projects to enter into a Project Labor
Agreement ("PLA") with the local Union(s) for the referral and/or supply of labor on such
project. First, it is my understanding that the requirement for entering into such an agreement
with the local Union would be contained in the project specifications upon which bids are
submitted. Additionally, it is my understanding that the PLA would establish the basic terms
and conditions of employment on the project, including provisions for wages, hours of work,
overtime, holidays, tools and equipment, safety and other such details of employment. Lastly,
the stated public purpose of such an agreement is to ensure a minimum skill level by project
workers as well as to ensure timely completion by minimizing work interruptions due to labor
disputes.
A cursory review of the proposed terms and conditions of the PLA reveals several areas of
concern which will require further research in order to formulate an agreement which can
sustain challenge. The areas for concern are as follows:
1. Uniform or "prevailing" wage requirements: Public Bidding and ERISA implications
As we have discussed, the City of Des Moines' ordinance requiring a prevailing wage
on City projects was found by the Iowa Supreme Court to violate both the Iowa
statutory requirement for competitive bidding on public projects (Iowa Code §384.99)
and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). See, City of Des
Moines v. Master Builders of Iowa, N.W.2d __ (Slip op. 92-345) (1993). The
Supreme Court of Iowa found that the requirement of a prevailing wage artificially
elevated low bids, which thwarts the bidding statute's purpose of obtaining the best
possible results at the lowest possible price. Additionally, the Court found that the
"wage and benefits" requirements of the ordinance violated ERISA, as the requirements
implicated benefit plans, which are an area reserved for federal authorities alone (and
are therefore outside city authority). Resolution of the bidding issue will require
designing terms which balance the public policy interests by maintaining a "floor" of
workmanship without artificially elevating the costs of a project. We shall also need
to become familiar with the intricacies of ERISA in an effort to avoid implicating
employee benefit plans when attempting to outline uniform details of employment.
Requirement to contract with and receive labor through local union(s): Anti-trust, Equal
Protection, Unfair Labor Practices and Right to Work implications
The requirement that each successful bidder must execute a contract with local
union(s) which will in turn make labor referrals to such contractors raises a number of
legal concerns. First, requiring a party to contract with a specific party for services
greatly restrains trade to those with "favored" status, and may have Anti-trust
implications. Thus, we shall need to familiarize ourselves with the Sherman Act and
the Clayton Act which prohibit trusts or business combinations in restraint of trade.
Next, although such an agreement would explicitly state that labor referrals shall be
made without reference to union membership and/or status, using an entity which has
a fiduciary duty to represent its membership to make employment referrals will at
minimum, notwithstanding such a clause, have an "appearance of impropriety". In
reality, this appearance may translate into a colorable claim that the City, as a
governmental entity, is supporting union membership to the detriment of non-union
workers and is therefore violating the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution. I will
need to review Equal Protection caselaw to determine whether requiring such an
agreement with local Unions as a condition of bidding would exceed an acceptable
governmental involvement and result in an unacceptable impact on non-union workers.
Further, the specific requirements of such an agreement will need to be reviewed in
light of the National Labor Relations Act to ensure that the proposed practices and
referral system do not constitute unfair labor practices. Most importantly, however,
the Iowa right to work laws (Iowa Code Chapter 731 ) makes it unlawful for an entity,
directly or indirectly, to require payment of union dues as a prerequisite to employment,
and any contracts which make employment contingent upon union membership are
void. Thus, we will need to carefully review this body of law and construct terms and
conditions to ensure that the union(s) make labor referrals without consideration of
membership, and that the existence of the agreement does not have the effect of
requiring union membership to obtain a referral.
Lastly, I note that when a similar agreement was reviewed by the U .S. Supreme Court,
(See, Buildin.q and C. Trades Counc. v. Assoc. Bldrs, 507 U.W.218 (1993)(also known
as "Boston Harbor")), the agreement was used on a 10 year, ~6.1 billion project
ordered as a result of a District Court lawsuit, which court order required the
construction to proceed without interruption, making no allowance for delays from
causes such as labor disputes. Subsequent court cases concerning such agreements
have focused on whether justification for such an agreement exists, for example where
work stoppages would seriously jeopardize a project. Thus, if such an agreement is
required, the City Council will need to make findings of sufficient justification to
support the same.
As stated, if the City Council wishes to pursue this matter further, we will allocate resources
to researching the above issues in an effort to design an agreement which can withstand
challenge. Please let me know how the Council wishes to proceed.
CC:
Eleanor Dilkes, City Attorney
Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager
sarah\opinion\laborag.mmo
IOWA - NEBRASKA - SOUTH DAKOTA
LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL
LABORERS' INTERNATIONAI UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (AFL-CIO)
MIDWEST REGION
r~OII, mNBYlNDRfVE. $l,I~8
MOll, l, IOWA 60333
WiLlAM 0. NitHARD
EUIINE$,S MANAGE~
t~,CI!~ I',I R Y- TRF..4 IIJRER
April 7, 1999
PHONE.. ISIS) 270.6961
FAX: (515) 270.fi~62
Mr. Steve Arkins, City Manager
City of Iowa City
Civic Center
410 E. Washington Street
Iowa OIly, Iowa 52240
Dear Mr. Arkins:
On behalf of the Iowa City Laborers' Union and Iowa CIty Carpenters' Union and the
Construction and Building Trades Council, I want to thank you for ~akln9 the time ~o meet
with us earlier this week. As we discussed, we are interested in pursuing, with the City of
Iowa City, a Project Labor Agreement (PLA) for the upcoming new water treatment ptant
and possibly the sewage Treatment plant improvements.
As you are aware, Project Labor Agreements between public entities and Local Building
Construction Trades Cduncils have proven ~o be very successful. PLA's are instrumental in
standardizing work rules end conditions, insuring a sufficient number of skilled tradesman
and eliminating any work stoppages on a large and complex building project. A Project
Labor Agreement can also 3pacify the work will be I~rformed by local traclesrnen. I am
enclosing a sample Project Labor Agreement for your review. We took forward to
continuing discussion5 and the possibility of a Projec~ LaDor Agreement for the City's
upcoming projects. If you have any questions, please feel free tO corl[~ct me. With kind
regards, I r main
Business M
IA/NE/SD LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL
ERe.
co:
Mr. Randy Raynor, Business Manager. Local Union #1231~
Mr. Rick Hanna, Business Manger, Carpenters' Local #1260
Mr. Ken Cable, President, Iowa City/Cedar Rapids Building and Construction Trades
Council
WGGilo
2 WHEREAS the City of Iowa City intends to construct a new Water
3 Treatment Plant, which will be the largest, most complex and most expensive
4 construction project ever undertaken by the City: and
5 WHEREAS the Project will require the employment of large numbers of
6 construction craft workers in many different trades; and
7 WHEREAS it is anticipated that there will be many contractors and
8 subcontractors working on the Project; and
9 V~rI-IEREAS it is xdtally important to the City that work on the project be of
10 the highest quality. and be completed in a timely manner. and
11 WHEREAS it is the desire of the City to encourage the employrnent of
12 qualified local construction craft workers;
13 The City Council makes the following findings of fact:
14 Project labor agreements have proven to be of major economic benefit to
15 private owners. municipalities, states and their subdivisions, particularly those
16 which extend for a substantial period of time, involve a number of different
17 trades or skilled craft workers, and which are complex, expensive, time
18 sensitive, or involve other special circumstances, by:
19 · Making available a ready and adequate supply of qualified, highly sMIled
20 and trained craft workers.
21 ° Permitting the contractors to accurately determine labor costs at the outset
22 of the Project.
23 · Establishing uniform conditions of employment for all employees on the
24 Project.
25 ° Guaranteeing uninterrupted work on the Project. thus facilitating timely
26 completion of the Project.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
IT IS THEREFORE RESOLVED that the successful bidder(s) on the Iowa
City Water Treatment Plant Project shall, at the time of being awarded a bid on
any portion of the construction work on said Project, certify that they have
entered into a binding, lawful project labor agreement with a local construction
union. unions or with a group of unions, which specifies the terms and
conditions of employment of construction craft workers who will be employed
on said Project. Said project labor agreement shall at a minimum include:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
A provision requiring the contractor(s) to obtain applicants for
employment through the referral system of the local construction
union(s}.
A provision requiring the local construction union(s) to refer qualified
applicants for construction craft jobs to the contractor(s) without
reference to union membership and prohibiting discrimination against
any employee or applicant by any contractor or union, referral system.
hiring hall or related job placement svstem based on the individuals
union membership or lack fi~ereof.
A provision permitting t.~,e contractor(s) to determine the number and
type of employees required. to determine the qualifications of all
applicants, and to reject any applicant referred by the local construction
union(s).
A provision requiring local construction union to use all means necessary
to provide sufficient numbers of qualified construction craft workers to
fill the requirement of the contractor(s).
A provision requiring all parties to make every effort to ensure that all
work on the Project is completed in accordance with the specifications
established by the City and in a prompt and timely manner.
A provision prohibiting work stoppages or slowdowns, of any kind,
including but not limited to lockouts, walkouts, strikes or picketing, even
in the event of the expiration of the project labor agreement or any other
applicable agreement.
A provision requiring that all disputes between the parties, including
jurisdictional disputes between participating local construction unions,
be submitted to binding arbitration.
2
1 8.
2
3
4
5 9.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
10.
11.
A provision requiring all parties to comply with applicable federal, state
and local laws and regulations with respect to health and safety, equal
employment opportunities and non-discrimination in employment.
A provision establishing uniform hours of work, overtime rules, holidays,
vacation and leave provisions for all employees employed on the Project.
A provision requiring that all signatory unions shall agree to offer the
same terms and conditions of employment, including the same wage
rates, to any and all successful bidders without regard to the contractors'
previous union status.
A provision requiring all signatory contractors to require that any and al
subcontractors also sign a project labor agreement conta,-'ning the
provisions enumerated above.
Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to require or prohibit
membership in any labor organization.
DEFINITIONS
"Contractor" shall mean any person, firm or corporation who contracts
x~,ith the City_, to perform any portion of cons~-uction work on any phase of the
Project. and shall include general contractor(s) and all sub-contractors.
"Construction work" shall have the same meaning as in Section 8(f) of the
Labor Management Relations Act, 29 USC § 158(0 and shall include site
preparation. demolition and new construction necessary for the completion of
the Project.
"Construction crafts" shall include all trades traditionally and ordinarily
associated with construction work including laborers, roofers, carpenters,
carpedayers, plasterers. plumbers, pipefitters and steamfitters, iron workers,
electrical workers, sheet metal workers, painters, heat and frost insulators,
millwrights. operating engineers, cement masons, stone masons, brick layers,
glaziers, boilermakers, teamsters and drivers, but excluding superintendents,
supervisors, staff engineers, surveyors, inspectors, timekeepers, clerks, mail
3
1 carriers, messengers, guards, emergency medical and first aid technicians,
2 office workers, estimators, and other professional engineering, administrative,
3 supervisory and management employees.
4 "Project labor agreement" shall mean an agreement between a contractor
5 and a local construction union covering the terms and conditions of
6 employrnent of construction craft workers employed on the Project entered into
7 pursuant to Section 8(19 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 USC §
8 15 8 (f).
9 "Local construction union" shall mean a labor organization as defined in
10 Section 2 of the Labor Management Relations Act. 29 USC § 152(5), and
11 authorized to enter into a project labor agreement pursuant to Section 8(f) of
12 the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 USC § 158(t9 which represents
13 workers in one or more of the construction crafts and regularly refers those
14 workers to jobs invohdng construction work in Johnson County, Iowa.
15 "Qualified consLruction craft workers" shall mean a worker who (a) has
16 completed or is currently enrolled in an apprenticeship program which has
17 been certified by the United State Department of Labor Bureau of
18 Apprenticeship and Training or (b) has four or more years of prior employment
19 in a construction craft and who is skilled in a construction craft or (c) in the
20 case of laborers, has two or more years experience as a construction laborer
21 and (d) for those trades for which a license is required, has the required
22 license.
23 "Project" shall mean the Iowa City Water treatment Plant Project.
4
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 22, 1999
To: City Council
From: City Manager
Re: Pending Development Issues
An application submitted by Plum Grove Acres Inc. for a preliminary plat of Scott Boulevard
East Part 4, a 7.36-acre, 15-1ot residential subdivision located east of Scott Boulevard and
Washington Street.
An application submitted by Plum Grove Acres Inc. for a final plat of Scott Boulevard East
Part 3, a 9.5-acre, 3-lot residential subdivision located east of Scott Boulevard and Washington
Street.
An application submitted by Gerald and Pauline Milder for a preliminary and final plat of Milder
Meadows, a 47.69-acre, 3-lot residential subdivision located on the north side of American
Legion Road ~ mile east of Taft Avenue in Fringe Area B.
An application submitted by Southgate Development for a preliminary planned development
plan (OPDH-12) for Lot 77 of Walden Woods, Part 6, a 16-unit residential development located
at the north end of Jensen Street.
An application submitted by Carl Stieglitz for a special exception to allow one front yard
reduction from 20 feet to 18 feet to allow a covered porch to encroach into the front yard, and
another front yard reduction from 20 feet to 18 feet to allow a 6ofoot high fence to encroach into
the front yard, for property located in the Low-Density Single-Family Residential (RS-5) zone at
811 Florence Street.
An application submitted by Philip and Helen Oldis and Robert and Rosemary Oldis for the
vacation of an unimproved portion of Virginia Drive located northeast of the intersection of
Virginia Drive and Ridgewood Lane.
jw/menVsa-developmt.doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
06-28-99
IP8
Date:
To:
From:
Re:
June 21, 1999
City Council 7
Eleanor M. Dilkes, City AttorneyV
Absence
I will be out of the office the week of June 28 - July 2. 1999. Sarah Holecek will handle
the Council meetings on Monday and Tuesday. My staff will know how to reach me.
Cc:
Steve Atkins
Dale Helling
Marian Karr
Sarah Holecek
Department Directors
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: June 24, 1999
To: City Council
From: Robert Miklo
Re:
Planning and Zoning Commission Work Program - Pending List
The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed their Work Program - Pending List for
fiscal year 2000. A proposed pending list is attached. The Commission has proposed the
removal of three items as discussed below.
Review definition of awnings: This item originally arose because of the Pizza Hut awning,
which has now been removed, and which may have been permitted as an awning in error. The
Pizza Hut awning did not function as an awning, but instead was more like afacia sign. There
have not been problems or complaints about other awnings.
Proposals for treatment of entranceways: One of the original reasons for this item to be
placed on the pending list was to preserve natural areas along the main roads into Iowa City.
The Sensitive Areas Ordinance addresses the preservation of woodlands, wooded slopes, and
other sensitive environmental features. The City has also been investing public funds into the
appearance of entranceways, both with entranceway signs and landscaping, and during public
infrastructure projects such as the WooIf Avenue Bridge and Melrose Avenue. Also, some
Conditional Zoning Agreements contain site-specific entranceway-related site and building
design requirements. The Commission felt that these have been effective ways to address
entryway concerns.
Guidelines for design of communication towers: We recently changed our zoning code to
allow towers by special exception in public zones. The idea was that it may be appropriate for
communications towers to locate in public zones such as the sewer treatment plant property, the
landfill property, etc. Towers are also allowed by special exception in the Interim Development
zone, and as a provisional use in the Industrial zones. The Board of Adjustment can require
certain tower designs or screening or setbacks as part of the special exception process for
communication towers in a Public zone or Interim Development zone.
In addition to the items on the pending list there are a few items that are currently being
reviewed by the Commission or a committee that will be sent to the Council in the near future.
These include the South Central District Plan; review of the Floodplain Management Ordinance;
provisions to assure neighborhood compatibility for multi-family buildings in established
neighborhoods; consideration of limited commercial uses in the RM-12 zone or revised home
occupation requirements.
IOWA CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
WORK PROGRAM - PENDING LIST
Fiscal Year 2000
Zoning Chapter Issues
1. Review Zoning and Subdivision Codes for compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan and
Community Housing Forum Report.
2. Review existing tree regulations, especially for parking lots that exceed the minimum
required parking spaces.
3. Consider zoning requirements for schools and other institutions.
4. Review parking requirements for fraternities and sororities.
5. Consider amending the CC-2 zone to permit hotels/motels.
6. Review parking requirements. for housing for the elderly.
Comprehensive Plan
1. North Planning District
6/24/99
f/shared/pending
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: 6/23/99 ~20
Front-'Cathy Eisenhofer, Purchasing Agent ~
CC-' RJ Winkelhake, Manouchehr Amin
RE: Rotation method for 3 year Towing Contract
The question has been raised as to why the City does not provide our own storage facility and allow
a rotation basis of privately owned tow trucks for towing?
The City generates approximately 1/2 of Big 10's business. 80% of the tows are released within 8
hours. Storage income is not a large revenue generator, $3-5,000/mo. Storage fees do not cover
the cost of staffing the lot, estimated at $36,000/mo. Monies are generated through volume of tows
and other services provided not storage fees. If the City implemented rotation towing, fees would
need to be evaluated to see if towing fees may need to decrease and storage fees increase to cover
the lot expenses.
The lot currently is open from 8:00 am to 8:00 PM, 7 days a week. The towing service is required to
be at the site within 20 minutes of the call, 24 hrs a day. Big 10 has 2 staff on at all times to handle
the storage lot X 3 shifts a day = 6 staff. In addition there are 2-3 employees that process the
paperwork of the business. This does not include tow truck drivers.
The Iowa City zoning code allows storage of abandoned or salvaged vehicles only in the I-1 zone.
Storage of operable vehicles would be permitted in a C1-1 zone. The City would be required to
designate land, add fencing costs and a building for impound and police investigation as well as
commit ongoing staffing costs or the City would pay a company to provide a storage lot and services
for the tows to be taken to.
There would also be issues of who's responsible for damage to vehicles towed. Currently, if Big 10
tows the vehicle, they are responsible from pickup to release. Insurance coverage is part of the
contract. If the City enters into rotation towing, inventory/inspection can be done when the vehicle is
brought into the lot but there is potential for separate damage and insurance claims as a result of
several companies.
The required equipment includes trucks that are needed to provide tows throughout the contract.
Small wreckers, large wreckers, and car carriers provide the necessary tows for cars as well as large
vehicles such as semi-trucks and buses. Additional small trucks are currently subcontracted for
events such as the Iowa Homecoming Parade. If you have a rotation basis for only the small trucks
there is not the incentive for the major equipment provider to maintain their larger units, currently
required by contract.
The City receives no direct revenue from the towing contract. The service is provided to assure
consistent and equitable towing/storage rates for the public as well as meet the City's legal
requirements for abandoned vehicles. Police officers offer to notify a towing company of choice to
the customer before contacting the contract towing company. To initiate a City lot or contract for a
storage lot in order to implement rotation towing does not appear to be a cost-effective change. Feel
free to contact me if you have any further questions.
PURCHASING
DIVISION
Date: July 9, 1996
To: Steve Arkins, City Manager
From: Cathy Eisenhofer, Purchasing Division, x5075
Jeanne Somsky, Purchasing Division, x5076
RE: PROPOSED TOWING CONTRACT - PROPOSALS RECEIVED 6~28~96
Note: The City receives no direct revenue from this contract.
BACKGROUND: Proposal documents were made available to 18 area towing service
providers. The City received two proposals and is recommending award to Big 10
University Towing, Inc., for the three-year contract. Big 10 University Towing, Inc., will
provide towing and storage services for vehicles impounded due to traffic violations,
abandonment, and police investigation. Big 10 is located 2.0 miles west of the city
limits on Hwy 1 South. Holiday Wrecker and Crane Service is located 1.5 miles west of
the city limits.
ATTACHED:
· Resolution for Council approval to award the contract to Big '10 University
Towing, Inc. on July 16, 1996. The resolution contains a provision that Big 10
University Towing, Inc., meet all requirements of the proposal documents by start of
contract, August 25, 1996.
· Summary of towing contract proposals received June 28, 1996:
· Big 10 University Towing
· Holiday Wrecker and Crane Service
· Comparison with the City's current contract rates, as well as rates from the University
of Iowa and other cities in Iowa.
· Report from Police Dept. regarding equipment and facilities.
COMMENTS:
· The contract vendor will change from Holiday Wrecking and Crane Service, who has
had the contract for at least the past 12 years, to Big 10 University Towing. Holiday
will conduct a final auction to comply with current contract requirements for disposal.
· The proposed contract is for three years, effective August 25, 1996.
· Basic towing rate will increase $5.00. (Same rate was offered by both bidders.)
Towing Contract, Memo to Steve Atkins, 7/9/96, p. 2
· The contract will cover an estimated 2,800 tows per year. At a conservative estimate
of $55 per tow, the contract is worth approx. $154,000 per year, or $462,000 for the
three-year period.
· The City receives no direct revenue from this contract.
· Required insurance coverage remains the same. Contractor is also required to submit
a $2,500 performance bond, and to complete Contract Compliance Documents by
start of contract.
· Under the new contract, vehicles stored for law enforcement investigation will be
charged $1,00 per day. In the past, such vehicle storage was at $7.00 per day for the
first week, with a rate negotiated for additional time.
· A new contract provision requires Contractor to notify the City in writing each month
regarding any vehicle(s) in storage for more than 30 days.
· The Iowa City zoning code allows storage of abandoned or salvaged vehicles only in
the I-1 zone. Storage of operable vehicles would be permitted in a C1-1 zone.
eric.
cc: R. J. Winkelhake, Police
Bill Dollman, Parking
Linda Woito, City Attorney
Terry Reynolds, Equipment
MEDIA RELEASE
Staff Contact: Lisa Mollenhauer
356-5010
Deer Line 356-5015
In order to make it easier for residents to provide input to the City regarding
deer, a recorded-message "Deer Line" has been established. By calling 356-
501 5, citizens may make a request, ask a question, record a concern, or
make a statement about Iowa City's deer. In order for comments to become
part of the official record, callers will need to state their name and address.
Comments will be forwarded to the City Council and Deer Management
Committee. If callers would like a return phone call, they should include their
daytime number.
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET * IOWA ('ITY, IOWA 52240-1826 * (319) 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-5009
06-28-99
IP12
June 23,1999
CITY OF I0 WA CITY
MEDIA RELEASE
Subject: Yard Waste Stickers Now on Sale
Yard waste container stickers for the new fiscal year (July 1999 through June 2000) am now
available for sale. Yard waste container stickers are available only from the Cashier at the Civic
Center, 410 E. Washington Street. The annual fee is $20 per sticker. For mail order, please
send a check for $20.50 (to cover mailing costs) to the Cashier at the Civic Center address. The
sticker is to be placed on a refuse container the customer supplies. Yard waste will be collected
weekly from that container for a full year. The container must be no larger than 35 gallons and,
when full, must not exceed 50 pounds.
Yard waste stickers are an option offered in addition to the $1 yard waste bags. If you have any
questions regarding yard waste container stickers, call the Iowa City Sanitation Division at 356-
5180.
indexbc\ltrs\l -1TS .doc
documetl
410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET · IOWA CITY. IOWA 52240-1826 · (319) 356-5000 · FAX (319) 356-$009
NYT Archives Article
IP13
Archives
Shop for cell one uns
May 6, 1999, Thursday
House & Home/Style Desk
NEW IEAREN
ABOUT THIS: SERVIC~E
ACCOUNT ~ENTER
ARCHIVES HELP
How Suburban Design Is Failing Teen-Agers
By WILLIAM L. HAMILTON
AS quickly as the word "alienation" can be attached to the idea of youth, the
image of isolation can be attached to a picture of the suburbs. Is there an
unexplored relationship between them? It is a question parents and urban
planners alike are raising in the aftermath of the Columbine High School
shootings in Littleton, Colo.
At a time when the renegade sprawl of suburbs themselves is being intensely
scrutinized, the troubling vision of a nation re-pioneered in vast tracts of
disconnected communities has produced uneasy discussion about the
psychological disorientation they might house.
Created as safe havens from the sociological ills of cities, suburbs now stand
accused of creating their own environmental diseases: lack of character and
the grounding principles of identity, lack of diversity or the tolerance it
engenders, lack of attachment to shared, civic ideals. Increasingly, the
newest, largest suburbs are being criticized as landscapes scorched by
unthoughtful, repetitious building, where, it has been suggested, the
isolations of larger lots and a car-based culture may lead to disassociation
from the reality of contact with other people.
Designers of the newest Ame~can suburbs say they have largely ignored or
avoided one volatile segment of the population -- teen-agers. In recent
conversations, three dozen urban planners, architects, environmental
psychologists and sociologists, and experts on adolescent development
agreed that specific community planning and places for teen-agers to make
their own are missing.
"They're basically an unseen population until they pierce their noses," said
William Morrish, a professor of architecture and the director of the Design
Center for American Urban Landscape at the University of Minnesota.
"They have access to computers and weaponry. The sense of alienation that
might come from isolation or neglect will have a much larger impact than it
might have before. And there are no questions coming from the design
community about what we can be doing about this. We don't invite them in."
http://graphics.nytimes.corn/images/ 6/24/99
NYT Archives Article Page 2 of 5
Virtually every other special interest has been addressed by enlightened
suburban designers -- the elde~y, the disabled, families with young children.
But, said Andres Duany, a planner who is a leading proponent of the "new
urbanism," a model of suburban design based on principles of traditional
towns, "it's the teen-agers I always bring up as a question mark." Mr. Duany
said that he had only once or twice included teen-agers in the public process
of planning a suburban development.
"It's a good point," he said, as though it were an unlikely idea. "I should talk
to the kids."
Though teen-agers tend to resist advice and choose their own turf as a
territorial issue of establishing self-identity, most experts interviewed say
that design could constructively anticipate and accommodate anxieties of
adolescence. They agreed that teen-agers need a place to congregate in and
to call their own; it is a critical aspect of relieving the awkward loneliness of
adolescence. Between home and school -- spheres compromised by the
presence of parents or the pressure of performance -- places for teen-agers in
the suburbs are as uncommon as sidewalks.
"It's a paradoxical situation," said Ray Suarez, host of"Talk of the Nation"
on National Public Radio and author of "The Old Neighborhood" (The Free
Press, 1999), a study of suburban migration. "Parents move there for their
children; their children are dying to get out."
Like much of the Western United States, Denver is experiencing vertiginous
suburban growth. From 1990 to 1996, the metropolitan area expanded by
two-thirds, to its current size of 535 square miles.
"Typical of the Denver metro area are the new suburbs, where 'downtown' is
a four-way intersection with three shopping centers and a condo
development," said Charles Blosten, community services director for
Littleton's city planning division. Highlands Ranch, Denver's largest
suburban development, has its own ZIP code, "nothing but roofiops and
miles and miles of nothing,, he said of the numbing vista of houses.. "It's got
to affect people."
The idea that place has an impact on adolescent development and
socialization is accepted by most experts on the suburbs but is only now
beginning to be studied. "A culture of impersonality has developed in the
suburbs by the way they're laid out," said Jonathan Barnett, a professor of
regional planning at the University of Pennsylvania and author of "The
Fractured Metropolis" (HarperCollins, 1996). In the newer suburbs, "the
standard of houses is high, but the standard of community isn't," he
continued, adding, "It's most people's impression of modern life."
And the people it stands to impress the most are children. "They are the most
vulnerable people growing up there," said Dr. Jose Szapocznik, a professor
of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and director of the Center for Family
Studies at the University of Miami. "As a child you're disabled by not being
able to walk anywhere. Nothing is nearby."
Mr. Morrish said he thought that public transportation to metropolitan
downtowns was crucial for high-school students. He said that the ability to
http ://graphics .nytimes.corn/images/ 6/24/99
NYT Archives Article Page 3 of 5
access "the system" -- the world adults create -- was a vital form of
empowerment.
"What to do after school, how to get to the city, to see other people and how
to negotiate this without parents," he said, posing the issues. "Teen-agers
have to have better access to the public realm and public activity." He
recalled a conversation with a group of high school students who met with
the Design Center, which invites teen-agers to group meetings when it is
commissioned to study neighborhoods.
"One girl said, 'All I've got is the Pizza Hut,' "Mr. Morrish said. "'You go
there a lot or you go to somebody's house -- we're tired of both.'"
Between home and school, in a landscape drawn by cars and the adults who
drive them, is there even a particular place that teen-agers can call their
own? Peter Lang, a professor of architecture at the New Jersey Institute of
Technology and an editor of "Suburban Discipline" (Princeton Architectural
Press, 1997), a collection of essays, said: "In most suburbs, there's not even
a decent park, because everyone has a backyard. But older kids never play in
the backyard. They'll find even the crummiest piece of park."
Typically, the students at Columbine High School went to Southwest Plaza,
a two-level mall that has video arcades, food courts and stores, supervised
by security guards and closed by 9 P.M. "Like any suburban community,
there's not a lot of places to go and hang out," Mr. Blosten said of Littleton.
"I tell you this because that's where my daughter goes -- the mall."
Mr. Lang said he thought that places like malls were not adequate gathering
spaces for teen-agers, calling them, like many public suburban venues,
commercially and environmentally "controlled space." He added, "They are
not places for free expression or hanging out."
Disagreeing that suburbs create greater alienation is Dr. Laurence Steinberg,
a professor of psychology at Temple University and director of the
MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and
Juvenile Justice. But he said that he thought recent tragedies like the
incident in Littleton do "wake people up to the notion that there is parental
disengagement in affluent suburbs." He added: "We did a a study on
latchkey kids. The kids most likely to be left unattended for long periods
were middle class, in sprawling professional suburbs. Isolated for long
periods of time, there's no counterbalancing force to fantasy."
The desire for more and cheaper land that has pushed suburbs to rural
exurbia may result in teen-agers who are alone for large parts of the day. Mr.
Morrish pointed out that in communities like Modesto, in the San Joaquin
Valley in central Califomia, people commute to jobs in the San Francisco
area, where they enroll their children in schools.
"Some people in California are taking their kids with them," he said,
"making the kids commute."
The planners who have been most vocally and visibly at work on
restrncturing the suburban model have been "new urbanists" like Mr. Duany.
Their solutions to the wheeling nebulae of tract development are based on
tighter concentrations of houses, businesses and public spaces connected by
http://graphics.nytimes.comJimages/ 6/24/99
NYT Archives Article Page 4 of 5
townlike elements -- porches, sidewalks and parks -- that have largely
disappeared from the new residential landscape.
If teen-agers find their place there, in new towns like Columbia and
Kentlands in Maryland or Celebration, the Disney-built town in Florida, it is
not because of any bravery on the planners' part. They often foster nostalgic
views of families with young children. But like conventional suburbs, they
overlook the inevitability of teen-agers in their design.
Peter Katz, who with Vincent Scully wrote "The New Urbanism: Toward an
Architecture of Community" (McGraw-Hill, 1993), spoke of the importance
to teen-agers of a place that existed only for them, neither hidden and
ignored nor exposed and supervised -- in effect, a secret place in full view.
On a visit, Mr. Katz discovered that for Celebration's teen-agers, it was a
narrow bridge, "with low railings, that goes from downtown to the health
club." He continued: "They find each other. They sit on the railing. It's on
the route to daily life -- not a back alley, but not the town square." Mr. Katz
suggested that such a structure could become a conscious part of a
community design for teen-agers.
For Diane Domey, a mother with two teen-age children who lives in
Kentlands, Md., a 10-year-old "new urban" suburb of some 1,800 people, the
hallmarks of town life work well for both parents and children. Ms. Dorney
and her husband, Mark, moved their family from a typical town-house
development.
"We wanted to raise our kids in a place that provided more than just a
house," she said. "It's a diverse community, of age and income," with older
people, young couples, families. Ms. Domeye said that she thought the gaze
of the town created a sense of extended family and moral weight that were
its most important success.
"Someone sneaking down the street to have a cigarette -- they don't get away
with it," she said. "I don't think teen-agers should be left on their own until
they're caught at the small things." She continued, "When they go into the
big things, they know how big they are." She added: "And we have another
way of knowing these kids, other than the bad things. They're your
neighbors, too. You're always seeing them. You give them another chance."
Organizations mentioned hi"this artieliii"
Related Terms:
Suburbs; Children and Youth; Murders and Attempted Murders; Education
and Schools
You may prir~t.0y save thiS"~iCie now.
New Search
SEARCH FOR:
Searc~.h.,,T_i. ps
SORT BY:
Ic~osest Match
http://graphics.nytimes.corn/images/ 6/24/99
319-354-4213
-> +919956~089 I08~ CITV CL~
Johnsan County
]~ IOWA ~
Jonathan Jordahl, Chair
Charles P. Duffy
Michael E. Lehman
Sally Stutsman
Carol Thompson
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Joint Meeting with the Solon City Council
Solon High School Auditorium
Solon, Iowa 52333
-
Monday, June 21, 1999
--:
INFORMAL MEETING --<
c3~-. .--
Agenda
1. Call to order 5:30 p.m.
2. Open House at Solon High School to view maps of proposed
Highway 1 North between Interstate 80 and Highway 30.
3. 6:30 p.m. - Join Solon City Council's special meeting
4. Roll call
changes to
5. Perfecting and approval of agenda
6. Introduction of Board of Supervisors
7. Comments form Solon City Council
8. Comments from Johnson County Board of Supervisors
9. Citizen Speak - Please start with name and address
Each person will be allowed two minutes to make comments
10. Closing comments from the Solon City Council
11. Closing comments from the Johnson County Board of Supervisors
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 354-4213
~/18/99 12:5~:59 319-~4-4~13 -~ ,31935~889 I09~ CITY CLBRH Page 802
12. Adjourn at 8:30 p.m.
08:41:41 919-~54-~19 -~ +~1995~580~ IOg~ CITV CL~K hgc 881
Johnson County
X_
Jonathan Jordahl, Chair
Charles D. Dufi~/
Michael E. L~hman
Sally Stutsman
Carol Thompson
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Agenda
Boardroom - 2nd Floor
Johnson County Administration Building
913 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
June 22, 1999
INFORMAL MEETING
CD -.-;'
I-~
1. Call to order 9:00 a.m.
2. Review of the formal minutes of June 17th
Business from Joe Aossey, Muslim Camps of America re: proposal for
Muslim Camp on Corps of Engineers land. discussion/action needed
Business from Jerri Robison, Field Supervisor and Mike Sullivan,
Ambulance Director re: to present the "Journey Unknown" program that
the ambulance service conducts each year in Johnson County.
discussion/action needed
5. Business from the County Auditor
a) Discussion/action needed re: Resolution 06-24-99-B1 appropriating
amounts for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2000.
b) Discussion/action needed re: Resolution 06-24-99-B2 establishing
Fund 41.
c) Discussion/action needed re: changing the wage rate to $8.00 for
Johnson County precinct officials.
d) Other
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-6086
BG/21/99 B8:42:12 319-354-4213 -> +31935fi5089 IOWfi CITV CLSRR Page BB2
Agenda 6-22-99
Page 2
6. Business from the County Attorney
a) Discussion/action needed re: Collective Bargaining Agreement with
PPME and Johnson County for the Administrative Unit.
b) Discussion/action needed re: Collective Bargaining Agreement with
PPME and Johnson County for the Sheriff' s Office.
c) Other
Business from Carol Peters, Administrative Assistant re: report/update
regarding new phone system for the Administrative Building, Ambulance
Building and County Attomey's Department. discussion/action needed
8. Business from the Board of Supervisors
a) Discussion/action needed re: appointments to the Johnson County
Housing Task Force.
b) Discussion/action needed re: advertising for a vacancy on the Johnson
County Board of Adjustment for a term ending December 31, 2002.
c) Minutes received
1. Johnson County Nutrition Board for May 17, 1999
2. East Central Iowa Council of Governments for May 27, 1999
3. Mid-Eastern Council on Chemical Abuse Board of Directors for
May 27, 1999
4. Hawkeye Area Community Action Program for May 2Z':, 5:i 99~
d) Reports
e) Other '~""
9. Discussion from the public
10. Recess
8G/18/99 10:11:5G 319-954-4213 -> +31995~009 IOMfi CITY CLERH Page 801
Johnson Courtly
]~ IOWA ~
Jonathan Jordahl, Chair
Charles P. Duffy
Miehaol E. Lohman
Sally Stutsman
Carol Thompson
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Agenda
Gold Room, Oakdale Hall
Oakdale Research Campus
Coralville, Iowa
June 22, 1999
INFORMAL MEETING
1. Call to order 1:00 p.m.
2. Work Session with Department Heads
a) Training Session re: goal setting
3. Adjourn
Johnson County
IOWA ~
Jonathan Jordahl, Chair
Charles D. Duffy
Michael E. Lehman
Sally Stutsman
Carol Thompson
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Agenda
Boardroom - 2nd Floor
Johnson County Administration Building
913 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
June 24, 1999
FORMAL MEETING
1. Call to order 9:00 a.m.
2. Action re:
3. Action re:
claims
formal minutes of June 17th
4. Action re: payroll authorizations
5. Business from the County Auditor
a) Action re: permits
b) Action re: reports
c) Other
Business from Lisa Dewey, Director of S.E.A.T.S. re: setting a date and
time for a public hearing on Missed Rides Policy for S.E.A.T.S.
discussion/action
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST. P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-6086
Agenda 6-24-99
Page 2
7. Business from the County Attorney
a) Discussion/action re: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Johnson County and PP1VIE for the Administrative Unit.
b) Discussion/action re: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Johnson County and PP1VIE for the Sheriff' s Office.
c) Other
between
between
8. Business from the Board of Supervisors
a) Discussion/action re: Resolution 06-24-99-B1 appropriating amounts
for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2000.
b) Discussion/action re: Resolution 06-24-99-B2 establishing Fund 41.
e) Discussion/action re: changing the wage rate to $8.00 for Johnson
County precinct officials, effective June 18, 1999.
d) Motion authorizing Chair to send Stephen J. Radosevich and Eldon
Moss a letter of appreciation and certificate for serving on the Johnson
County Zoning Board of Adjustment.
e) Discussion/action re: appointments to the Johnson County Board of
Adjustment for terms ending December 31, 1999 and December 31,
2002.
f) Discussion/action re: appointments to the Johnson County Housing
Task Force.
g) Discussion/action re: contract with Digital Communications for the
new phone/voice mail system for the Johnson County Administration
Building in the amount of $64,648.00.
h) Motion authorizing an instant claim to Digital Communications ~r the
fLrst payment for the new phone/voice mail system.
i) Discussion/action re: fireworks permits.
j) Other
9. Adjourn to informal meeting
a) Reports and inquiries from the County Attorney
b) Inquiries and reports from the public
e) Reports and inquiries from the members of the Board of Supervisors
d) Other
10. Adjournment
86/28/99 88;Z?|86 319-35q-qZ13 -> +3193565089 IOWfi CITV CLgRE Page 881
Johnson County
i'~
\
Jonathan Jordahl, Chair
Charles D. Duff3,
Michael E. Lehman
Sally Stutsman
Carol Thompson
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Agenda
Boardroom - 2nd Floor
Johnson County Administration Building
913 South Dubuque Street
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
June 29, 1999
INFORMAL MEETING
1. Call to order 9:00 a.m.
2. Review of the formal minutes of June 24th
Business from Jeff Davidson, Transportation Planner for Johnson County
Council of Governments re: resolution supporting the First Amendment
to the 28E Agreement between the City of Coralville, the City of Iowa City,
and Johnson County providing for the preservation of the Oakdale Boulevard
Corridor. discussion/action needed
4. Business from Joanne Hora re: Senior Center update. discussion
5. Business from the County Auditor
a) Discussion/action needed re: Resolution 07-01-99-B1 establishing
Fund 06.
b) Discussion/action needed re: Resolution 07-01-99~B2 interest earned
in the Technology Fund remain in the Technology Fund.
c) Other
913 SOUTH DUBUQUE ST, P.O. BOX 1350 IOWA CITY, IOWA 52244-1350 TEL: (319) 356-6000 FAX: (319) 356-6086
0fi/28/99 ~8:27:3fi 319-354-4213 -> +31935~5809 IOg~ CITY CLERR Page 882
Agenda 6-29-99
Page 2
Business from Angela Williams, Housing Planner for East Central Iowa
Council of Governments re: resolution to approve East Central Iowa
Council of Governments to write a Housing Grant on their behalf.
discussion/action needed
7. Business from the Board of Supervisors
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
g)
Discussion from the public
Recess
Discussion/action needed re: Board of Supervisors goals.
Discussion/report/action needed re: budget foes.
Discussion/action needed re: appointment to the Iowa City Riverfront
and Natural Areas Commission.
Discussion/action needed re: changing Board appointments to the
Sixth Judicial District and MECCA Board of Directors.
Minutes received
1. Johnson County Council of Governments Regional Trails and
Bicycling Committee for May 4, 1999
2. Sixth Judicial District Department of Correctional Services Board
of Directors for May 19, 1999
3. Heritage Area Agency on Aging Advisory Council for May 27,
1999
4. East Central Iowa Employment and Training Consortium for May
27, 1999
5. Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors for May
27, 1999
Reports
Other
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
A
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
TOTAL (during phase-in)
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
I B I
LATEST
ASSESSMENT
$836,630
EFFECT OF PROPERTY TAX PHASE-ZN ON REVENUE TO THE CITY
C
6-~
3-STORY
BARE LAND
BUILDING (with
I
$255,850 $1,165,850 $2
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$25,858 $%066 $36,757
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$129,290 $40,332 $183,784
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
$25,858 $8,066 $36,757
10 YEAR TOTAL $258,580 $80,662 $367,569
H I I I ] I K I L
TORY Increased Increased
.DING revenue revenue over
~h tax over Bare 3-Story
se-in) Land Building
30,000
3,450 $28,384 -$306
7,043 $38,976 $10,286
7,635 $49,569 $20,878
!,228 $60,161 $31,471
t,820 $70,754 $42,063
8, 176 $ 247,844 $104,392
1,820 $70,754 $42,063
1,820 $70,754 $42,063
t,820 $70,754 $42,063
1,820 $70,754 $42,063
1,820 $70,754 $42,063
2,276 $601,614 $314,707
$36
$288
$78
$78