Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-03-07 Bd Comm minutes *APPROVAL ENDING*. ANIMAL CONTROL ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES - January 20, 2000 Meeting ATTENDING:Ursula Delworth, Shawn Lockhart, Diana Lundell, Mary Shafer (Chair) ABSENT: Jonelle Hankner STAFF: Denise Cassidy, Misha Goodman, Terry Koehn, Tom Widmer VISITORS: Janet Ashman, Linda Tomblin (Public); Erick Wakiaga (Press- Citizen) Minutes of the December 2, 1999 were approved. OLD BUSINESS 1. SHELTER STATISTICS. The 1999 statistical report was distributed and discussed. Adoptions are very good. 2. UPDATE ON GOALS. Goal 3 o Mobile adoption site increase. No action. Goal 4 - Exploration of medical services. In process. Goal 5 - S/N of Shelter animals. Plan will be presented at March meeting. Goal 6 - Information classes. No action. 3. COMPUTER SOFTWARE. Additional monies have been requested through the police dept. NEW BUSINESS 1. BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR CENTER UPDATES. Granted. 2. NEW APPOINTMENT. No action is needed, since it was ascertained that Shafer's term ends 1/12/2001. 3. CORALVILLE GROOMING SHOP. There are no criminal violations, accoring to Koehn. The investigation is on-going at the state level. 4. PET SHOP CLOSURE. Goodman reported that an Iowa City pet shop closed voluntarily due to animal care problems. 5. ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 2000: Chair- Shafer Vice-Chair - Lockhart (with Board's expectation that he chair in 2001.) Secretary- Lundell CITIZEN COMMENTS: Public member Ashman inquired whether Coralville will be considering pet shop licensing. Lundall replied that it would be discussed by the Coralville City Council. NEXT MEETING: Thursday, March 16, 2000 6:30 pm- IC Transit Building AGENDA OLD BUSINESS 1. Update on goals #3,4, and 6. NEW BUSINESS 1. Spay/Neuter plan for Shelter animals. Respecfully submitted, Ursula Delworth Secretary * APPROVAL PENDING* HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CIVIC CENTER, LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 2000 - 6:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Dan Coleman, Denita Gadson, Bob Elliott, Rick House, Jayhe Moraski, Luci'a-Mia Page, Kathleen Renquist, Gretchen Schmuch, Bill Stewart MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Maggie Grosvenor, Steve Long, Steve Nasby, Angela Williams OTHERS PRESENT: None RECOMMENTATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL MOTION: Coleman moved to recommend to the Iowa City Council to give the two South Pointe lots to the Greater Iowa City Housing Fellowship (GICHF) as decided in the Commission's November meeting. Schmuch seconded the motion. The motion to make this a recommendation to Council was carried by a vote of 9-0. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Moraski called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FROM DECEMBER 16, 1999: Coleman said that he had noted a correction. On Page 4 under New Business, the sentence should state that both Moraski and Coleman had drafted the letter. Motion: Elliott moved to approve the December 16, 1999 meeting minutes as amended. Coleman seconded the motion. The motion was carried by a vote of 9-0. PUBLIC/MEMBER DISCUSSION OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: Renquist shared an article in 'Great Homes magazine that included photographs of units designed by Burns & Burns Architecture. Moraski said that if any member could attend the Iowa City south central district draft planning and support affordable housing, she would encourage them to do so. She said that she believes the Housing and Community Development Commission (HCDC) should think of themselves as advocates for housing, and not necessarily for one particular group. She has heard comments that the Commission should speak out on various issues. She said the letter they recently drafted is a nice way to do that. The letter discussed how the Commission is in favor of creating and preserving affordable housing. REVIEW OF THE FY01 ALLOCATION SCHEDULE: Nasby said that he put together a timeline so that HCDC would have a general idea of when allocation benchmarks need to be completed. Commissioners discussed their schedules and made several changes. During the discussion, HCDC decided there will be a meeting on February 24u~ and ranking sheets would be due on February 29u~. Nasby said that he would distribute the revised schedule to everyone. Housing & Community Development Commission Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 2 MONITORING REPORTS: MECCA - Aid to A.clencies - Gadson said that she received information about the demographics of the clients and leamed that the entire allotment for FY2000 had been spent. From July through December 1999, a total of 1,196 people (863 male and 333 female) had been seen. Of those, 73 percent of both the men and the women were under the age of 34. Caucasian men totaled 87percent, Caucasian women totaled 83 percent, African-American men totaled 8 percent, and African-American women totaled 12 percent. CCIA - Youth Leadership - Schmuch said that she knows the funds have been spent and that it went well. She did not have any further details at this time. Successful Living - SRO Rehab. -Willjams said she learned that approximately $15,000 was awarded, but the work for the requested items was completed under budget. Less than $10,000 was spent to replace the refrigerator and freezer, the construction work, and the installation of cabinets. Therefore, City staff approved additional work up to the budgeted amount. Free Lunch Pro.clram - Kitchen Improvements - Moraski said that the money has not been spent because they did not have any bidders on the Request for Proposal (RFP) that was released for the new commercial-grade stove. The RFP had to be re-released. She added that 38 different volunteer groups work together to provide lunch for 100 to 120 people every day except Sunday. Mercantile Bank - Down Payment Assistance (FY96) - House said that he was told he would be provided with details before the next HCDC meeting. City of Iowa City - Critical Issues Plannin.q (FY97) - House said that $17,627 of the funds remain after the Maxfield Study. The rest of the funds have been earmarked to improve and streamline the City's development code. He said six proposals for the study have been received and the top three would be inte.rviewed on February 1st. The estimated cost is $60,000 to $130,000. Nasby explained that the Community Housing Forum recommended a complete review of the City's development code to streamline it and reduce excessive regulations. He said that they paired up with the Urban Planning Division on the release of the RFP. The range of the bid price includes Phase I -- a review of the code and Phase II -- rewriting the City's development code. OLD BUSINESS: Discussion and Recommendation on the Swenson Project Nasby reported that the family was unable to close because during the final inspection for the Conditional Occupancy Permit, the City inspections found 15 deficiencies in the unit. Those need to be corrected before the family can move in. He said the biggest remaining item is a sub pump discharge line that needs to be trenched in to meet the subdivision requirement. The project is over budget because of the extended timeframe, but the homeowner moving in will not be affected. Nasby said that in November, the Commission voted to grant the two South Pointe Lots to the Greater Iowa City Housing Fellowship. He added that the motion would need to go through the Council because it would be a substantial change to the project. MOTION: Coleman moved to recommend to the Iowa City Council to give the two South Pointe lots to the Greater Iowa City Housing Fellowship (GICHF) as decided in the Housing & Community Development Commission Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 3 Commiss|on's November meeting. Schmuch seconded the motion. The motion to make this a recommendation to Council was carried by a vote of 9-0. NEW BUSINESS: Grosvenor provided an explanation of a handout that HCDC received. She explained that the Quality Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 was a comprehensive statutory change and many parts of it are still unfolding. One of the components of meeting this Act is Housing Authodties across the United States must have a one-year plan (annual plan) and five-year plan.. She said that the information in the plan was to provide a framework for local accountability and an easily identifiable source by which public housing residents, participants in the Section 8 program, and other members of the public may locate basic Housing Authority policies, rules, and requirements concerning its operations, programs, and services. Grosvenor said that the format of the document to be reviewed by the Commission was a HUD template and that the plans must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The information is currently in draft form and she encouraged the Commission to provide any feedback. Grosvenor said that the Iowa City Housing Authodty needs to document what it is doing and allow for a 45- day public comment period. Elliott asked how much of the document reflects what the City would like to do and how much reflects what HUD is asking the City to do. Grosvenor said that the document does reflect what came out of CITY STEPS and the Comprehensive Plan. Nasby said that the City received two CDBG and HOME applications after the noon deadline. He provided HCDC with a memo and letters from the applicants about the late applications. Commissioners read the information and Stewart noted that he would not want to exclude anyone because they missed the deadline by a couple of hours. He said that he believes the City and Federal government should treat people as if they were customers. Nasby said that he thought this was a consistency and fairness issue; therefore, he told the applicants that it Was too late to submit the applications. Schmuch said that if these persons received funding while another person who made the deadline did not, this would be viewed as inconsistent and unfair. She added that in the past, the Commission has been very strict about people presenting what was in the application and not allowing changes. Elliott said that he agreed with Stewart but questioned how late the Commission would accept applications. He said that there could be legal ramifications if the HCDC accepted the applications, just as there would be if accepting late bids. He asked City staff if the Commission had ever rejected an application because it was late. Nasby said that they have not had this exact situation. Moraski explained that there was a different situation that Schmuch pointed out where the applicant wanted to make changes to the project a month after the application had been turned in. Moraski added that both of the letters indicated that the applicants missed the deadline because of emergencies and extenuating circumstances. She stated that this is different from the past situation. Nasby noted that both applicants called to let them know the applications would be late prior to the noon deadline. Moraski said that the Commission had previously discussed whether they wanted to follow the intent of the program or follow the procedures to the letter. She agreed with Stewart in following the intent of the program by giving the late applicants a chance. Coleman said that he agreed with Stewart because there is a place on the ranking sheet where the Commission can consider the applicanrs ability to do the project. He also suggested drafting a policy for the applications about how the Commission could give exemptions to the deadline under certain conditions, but that there would be a deduction of points from the ranking. He said that this would be something the HCDC could discuss in the future. He thought the Commission should accept the applications for now. Housing & Community Development Commission Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 4 Nasby said that the City also received a phone call from someone who knew that their application would be late, so they did not submit it. Elliott said that is why this is a faimess issue. Stewart said that the City could contact that person. Nasby said there may have been as many as four or five applications that were expected that did not ardve. Elliott said that if the HCDC accepts the two applications, they would need to afford the same opportunity to those who did not submit an application. Gadson said that in order to do this, they would need to extend the deadline. She added that she liked Coleman's i,dea but tho,ght that it should be something the Commission looks at for next year under the advice of counsel and guidance of City staff. .Galeman Moraski and. Stewart said that they would be willing to "take the heat" and accept the late applications because of the circumstances of the individuals. MOTION: Coleman moved that the Commission accept the two late CDBG/HOME applications. Stewart seconded the motion. The motion failed by a vote of 4-5. (Coleman, Moraski, Stewart, Page in favor. Gadson, Elliott, House, Renquist, Schmuch opposed.) Nasby handed out a citizen's financial summary of the City's budget plan. He said that the City Council would hold a budget meeting with the City's boards and commissions on January 25t". He said that if anyone from the HCDC wanted to attend, they should call to sign up for a 15- minute slot or let him know so he could schedule a time slot. He also gave the Commission a copy of a Letter to the Editor that appeared in the Press-Citizen about the City's consolidated plan. Long also provided HCDC with an article from the Gazette about an apartment complex Iowa State University is building that has rent rates from $285-$315. Commissioners also received a memo and a binder filled with applications for CDBG & HOME Funds. Nasby commented that the HCDC has approximately $1.8 million to allocate. He said that the SRO money not previously used was rolled into this year's funds. This amount also includes some unexpended program income and the usual CDBG/HOME allocations. He said the meetings would be held at the Senior Center. ADJOURN: MOTION: Stewart moved to adjourn the meeting. Coleman seconded the motion. The motion was carried by a vote of 9-0. The meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Minutes submitted by Wendy Larive. jw/c:/temp/hcdcl -20-(X).doc 03 07 00 ~ MINUTES " 4;(~) PRELIMI;,,,,, THURSDAY, JANUARY 20, 2000, 3:00 PM IOWA CI~ MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM Subject t0 pr0val MEMBERS PRESENT: Nancy Purington, Rick Fosse, Emily Vermillion, Sandra Hudson, Terry Trueblood MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Nagle STAFF PRESENT: Karin Franklin, Joyce Carroll OTHERS PRESENT: John Kenyon- Iowa City Gazette, Deb Galbraith CALL TO ORDER Purington called the meeting to order at 3:10 P.M. DISCUSSION OF SEMI-FINALISTS FOR PEDESTRIAN MALL SCULPTURE COMPETITION Franklin began by stating that there are five sculpture pads for which artists will need to be chosen. The locations are two at Black Hawk Mini Park, one in a planter outside Blimpie's, one by a playground and one at the far west end of the mall near Lorenz's Shoe Store. Purington reviewed with committee members the design considerations that were listed in the call. They were as follows: to select works of ad which inspire and delight. To conceptually illustrate phenomena of wonder. i.e., instruments for the weather, direction, time, space, motion and light, or themes related to regional geography, history and sense of place. Concepts may be developed in the following ways: representational and abstract; kinetic or interactive works representing variations on natural form; figurative works. She went on to remind members that this was the flavor and direction that the committee agreed upon this as being the foundation for the sculpture call. Although it could be interpreted as "anything goes" it also could be used to rein in the Committee in their selection. Fosse asked for an example of a figurative piece. Purington said actual figures like humans are figurative. Vermillion noted that she thinks the kiosks need to be considered when selecting the type of sculpture because the kiosks are quite large and sculptural. They consume a large space and have quite a presence. Franklin said she thought this was particularly important on the west leg of College Street as the pad is near the kiosk. Purington also asked members to use a 1-10 number system with ten being the high score to rate the work that was being viewed. This has been done in the past in other projects Purington has been involved in. It has not been implemented in this committee's past selection process, but Purington said she felt it was a needed process. This would allow for more clarity in the discussion. Franklin reminded members as they look at the work to consider if the artists have the ability to do the kind of work that is being sought as opposed to just considering the piece that is being shown. These artists were chosen by the selection panel and reviewed by the committee as follows: Billy AI Bengston- His work is between $45-80K. Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 2 Roger Berry- His work ranges between $20-200K. His work included a water wall that has a thin sheet of water flowing down the corner wall of the building reflecting the skylight in color. Jonathan Bonner- This artist did not provide any prices. His work included a piece for a 100' foot circle at a hospital. Bonner also included a wind series of pieces that provided kinetic elements. The selection panel suggested his kinetic pieces for the call. Robert W. Ellison- The price range for this artist is $14-225K. Barbara Grygutis- Her works range from $25-500K. The selection panel suggested that her chair pieces would be appropriate for this call. Norm Looney- No prices were provided. This artist's plain colored and kinetic pieces were recommended by the selection panel. Donald Mitchell- The panel suggested that Mitchell's work should be considered for the playground area. His work ranges from $8-34K: Kevin Robb- This artist's work ranges from $8-40K. Barton Rubenstein- This artist has pieces which include water or are kinetic. The panel recommended the kinetic pieces for consideration. His pieces range from $21-27K. A video is available of his work. Julius $chmidt- He is an Iowa artist from Iowa City. His work ranges from $45-60K. The piece he suggested for sale is cast in bronze at 112" in height and is priced at $45K. Julio Teich- The price range for this artist is $5-100K. The selection panel recommended his work for the playground area. Clark Wiegman- His work ranges from $20-155K. It includes stainless steel, aluminum, copper and bronze, electronics, water and lights systems. This artist gave the price and construction costs. This artist also showed a project which included the work of several artists' collaboration. Thomas Chouteau- The selection panel requested that this artist be considered for this call in the children's' area. He is from Davenport. His work includes a kaleidoscope called Blue Note, priced at $4800. The artisrs recommended maintenance for this piece was the eye piece be cleaned daily. The wheel should be lubricated monthly and every four months the wheel should be removed, inspected and lubricated. The riser/rotator should be lubricated. The piece should be painted periodically as well. Vermillion explained that these can be an artist's wishes; however this can be discretionary as need arises. Vermillion also commented on considering pieces for children's' areas versus the adult area. When things are obviously for children they really should be considered for the adult areas. Adults would enjoy a piece like this as much or more than children. She said she felt adults need to play and need inspiration. Iowa City Public Ad Advisory Committee Minutes January 20, 2000 Page 3 Trueblood noted that to comply with safety standards for any piece which someone can climb on there must be a shock absorbing surface below it. The following artists received a split vote and are to be considered by the committee: Michael D. Bigger- This artist's work ranges from $20-50K. Michael Peter Cain- The price range for this work is $5-62K. He is from Iowa. Some of his work is at the Cedar Rapids Airpod. Kathleen Caricof- This artist did not provide a price range. Robert J. Gehrke- His work ranges from $30-50K. Ivan Kosta- No price range was provided. Vermillion noted that the committee needs to be conscience that there are no vistas on the City Plaza. Many of the large works are shown in areas with vistas. Thomas Lindsey- His work ranges from $30-50K. Molly Mason- This artist is a native of Cedar Rapids. The prices range from $13-45K. Christopher Sl~ath- This artist did not provide prices. His work consists of stone and glass inlaid pieces. Steven Woodward- His work ranges from $40-180K. His work is made of wood and metal. Vermillion inquired if large works which one could pass through needed to meet ADA requirements. The committee agreed that this issue would need to be addressed. Vermillion also clarified that the artist Robert Sunderman's work was included in the literary walk instead of Steven Woodward's and that Woodward is the one who should be included. Woodward's work consisted of a large plaza with books. Hudson noted that she felt that there is not enough diversity of representation for the public at- large. She looks at this situation as providing a service to the community as opposed her personal taste in art. There seems to be one outlook on art presented in this collection regardless of the artist. There does not appear to be any realism in this selection of artists. She inquired about the perspective that would be taken. Galbraith commented that this was the same issue that took place with the Vietnam Vets Memorial. People did not identify with the wall and this was the reason the three soldiers piece was put up. Purington said that the call was for up to five selections for five pads and the committee is not required to do five selections from this pool. Another option is to decide that the selection pool is too monolithic in its perspective and take the opportunity back to the selection panel. These artist's works do not appear to meet the broader objectives of the call. She feels there needs to be more discussion and focus on the goal. Purington made the suggestion that the committee limit the selection from this pool to two to three pads. Iowa City Public A~ Adviso~ Committee Minutes Janua~ 20,2000 Page 4 Franklin spoke about the budget constraints. She provided the public art budget information as follows: Balance: $130,374.80 The anticipated expenses for the remainder of FY00 is as follows: $ 7,000 - Weatherdance contract 400 - Plaques for Weatherdance 2,000 - Administration Costs 1,600 - Honoraria to 8 artists for Literary Walk $11,000 - TOTAL The balance with anticipated expenses is $119,374.80. Purington and Vermillion suggested the honoraria be increased from $200/artist to $500/artist. The budget was amended accordingly, resulting in an available balance of $116,974.80. Franklin suggested pursuing the artists for each pad now but deferring actual acquisition for some period of time. Vermillion said she felt three years is a very reasonable time for artists to complete their work if commissioned. She also commented that it is important to not lose track of the concept. Franklin then said that there is a budget proposal to diminish the public art budget from $100K to $75K. She said that it is in the capital projects program. In the proposal of the City Manager to the Council there had to be limitations on capital projects so that taxes would not increase any more than projected. For this reason a number of projects were cut. The decisions will be made by the Council at a later date as to the cuts that will take place. Vermillion asked if it would help to enlighten the Council on the price range of public sculpture. Based on the submission list the general price range is $20-45K. She does not believe people are generally aware of the cost of art. Trueblood said in the scheme of things this is a twenty-five percent cut in this budget item. Vermillion concurred this is an important fact that the Council needs to be informed of at this time. Purington said she would be going to the budget meeting on January 25, 2000. She invited other committee members to attend the meeting as well as it would be helpful to explain these issues to the Council. Galbraith commented that Governor Viisack has made proposals to the budget for quality of life type projects such as cultural facilities. She said she sees this as a time to build up the budget for items such as public art and not make cuts. ADJOURNMENT The next sculpture selection meeting will be January 27, 2000, at 3:30 PM. The meeting adjourned at 5:10 PM. Minutes submitted by Le Ann Dunne-Tyson. ppddi~min/artl -20-00,doc MINUTES PRELIMINAR' THURSDAY, JANUARY 27, 2000, 3:30 PM Subject to ... proval IOWA CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY MEMBERS PRESENT: .Nancy Purington, Rick Fosse, Emily Vermillion, Sandra Hudson, Terry Trueblood, Gary Nagle MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Karin Franklin, Joyce Carroll OTHERS PRESENT: Deb Galbraith CALL TO ORDER Purington called the meeting to order at 3:35 P.M. DISCUSSION OF SEMI-FINALISTS FOR PEDESTRIAN MALL SCULPTURE COMPETITION Purington began by reviewing the design considerations for the call as being to select works of art which inspire and delight. In addition, it will conceptually illustrate phenomena of wonder (i.e., instruments for weather, direction, time, space, motion and light or themes related to regional geography, history and sense of place). The work may be representational and abstract, kinetic, interactive works representing or variations on natural form2figurative works. She went on to say that figurative works were intentionally included in the call. Franklin then re-capped the previous meeting. All of the slides were reviewed that had come from the selection panel. She stated the goal of this meeting was to focus on some of these artists with the idea of finding competitors for two or three pads. Artists for the other two to three pads will be sought from the original slides that were submitted but rejected by the selection panel. This committee will then determine competitors from that selection to compete for the remaining pads. The issue was what had come from the selection panel was not diverse enough in terms of the kind of art that was represented. The desire of the committee was to have more diverse art to meet the various tastes of the community. Purington then noted that a minimum of one site opportunity was to be awarded to an Iowa artist. She said she would prefer a minimum of two artists and would like to lobby for at least two artists who are from Iowa. Vermillion reminded the committee that they had discussed the fact that in determining the children's area they should not distinguish between works for children and adults. PRESENTATION OF ARTIST'S WORK The artists were presented and rated on a scale of one to ten with the total score listed in parenthesis as follows: Billy AI Bengston (44) Donald Mitchell (32) Julio Teich (38) *Roger Berry (20) *Kevin Robb (32) Clark Weigman (37) Jonathan Bonnet (47) *Barbara Grygutis (33) *Michael D. Bigger (14) *Barton Rubenstein (26) *Norm Looney(39) *Michael Peter Cain (25) Robert W. Ellison (46) *Julius Schmidt (27) Kathleen Caricof (36) Robert J. Gehrke (41) *Ivan Kosta (23) Thomas Lindsey (21) *Molly Mason (23) Christopher Spath (51) *Steven Woodward (27) Michael Chouteau (52) * Artists were eliminated due to low ratings from the committee. Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes January 27, 2000 Page 2 The discussion regarding the artists was as follows: Ben.clston: Fosse commented that he felt the work was too fragile and that people could damage it. Vermillion thought his work seemed to be very whimsical and could work well around the west end of the mall area. Hudson said that the top portion of the vane does keep with the theme; however she did not like the work from the toe down. Purington found the work to be delightful and would be positive. Both Trueblood and Nagle did not like the style of the work. Bonner: All members preferred the weathervane pieces. Purington commented that it does illustrate waves and wind. Purington also noted that she liked the egg pieces. Ellison: Vermillion noted that this artist's work is similar to the work of Bengston. Purington did not care for the work. However, other members found the work to be colorful and whimsical. Vermillion felt this adist's work would be good for the children's area. Grygutis: Vermillion commented that she felt a single chair would be odd and insignificant for the pads that are being considered. The members felt that her work could be considered for the literary walk or for later consideration of seating. Mitchell: Galbraith said she felt some of the pieces seemed to have hazardous features. Vermillion noted that she thought this work would be excellent for the children's area. Teich: Vermillion commented that this work would fit well in the downtown architecturally as well as it being whimsical and colorful. Purington did not find the work appealing as its features are like that of shopping mall atmospheres that are popular today. Galbraith said she found the work playful and that people would enjoy it. Wei.qman: The group agreed that the "keys" would be attractive in the area. Vermillion found the work to be diverse with the artist showing adaptability. Caricof: The group generally agreed that they liked the work and the materials used in the pieces. Vermillion did not feel it would fit well in the downtown area; however Fosse felt it would be attractive to many people with the romantic features. Galbraith did question the materials being durable enough for use in outdoor pieces. Gehrke: Vermillion thought this artist would appeal to a lot of people. Fosse liked the level of detail in his work. Trueblood liked the work; while Purington did not as it seemed to present conflict with the type of art versus the materials used. Nagle agreed with Purington's opinion. Franklin brought up the library referendum on the library proposal. If the library is renovated the playground equipment will be temporarily taken out and turned around. Therefore, she suggested that it may be a good idea to do the playground pad at a later date. It was agreed by the committee to select artists for the north entrance pads and for the location on the west end by Lorenz's. They also decided that the kaleidoscope piece by Michael Chouteau will be considered independently as a sixth option later. Vermillion suggested that the artist be given a photo of the sculpture pad area to impose their proposed piece for public consideration. The committee agreed that this would be a good idea. Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes January 27, 2000 Page 3 The artists were selected as follows: West-End North-End Bengston Bonner Teich Weigman Ellison Spath Gehrke The committee decided that Caricof and Gehrke will be considered for the planter area and will be dealt with at a later date. It was also determined that Mitchell will be considered for the children's area. Nagle left the meeting at 6PM. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:15 PM. Minutes submitted by Le Ann Dunne-Tyson. ppddir/min/artl -27-00.doc MINUTES ~ PRELIMINARY THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 2000, 3:30 PM Subject to ,-ppr0vai CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM _ MEMBERS PRESENT: Nancy Purington, Rick Fosse, Emily Vermillion, Sandra Hudson, Terry Trueblood, Gary Nagle, Scott Hansen MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Karin Franklin, Joyce Carroll OTHERS PRESENT: Kevin Hanick CALL TO ORDER Pudngton called the meeting to order at 3:35 P.M. Franklin introduced Scott Hansen to the committee. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA Purington noted that Siah Armanjani would be making a presentation at the Public Library at 7PM that evening. She also noted that at Arts Iowa City there would be a show of local artists from 5-7PM on February 4th and on February 25th the 25th anniversary party will take place from 5PM until midnight. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 6 MEETING Hudson inquired if the clarification of the Visual Artists Rights of 1990 was included in the meeting minutes. Franklin stated that they would be attached to the minutes of'January 6th and presented to the council. Trueblood moved to approve the minutes with a second made by Fosse. The minutes were approved by unanimous consent. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIR Vermillion was nominated as the vice-chair by Fosse with a second by Hudson. Vermillion was elected on a vote of 7-0. DISCUSSION OF IOWA AVENUE LITERARY WALK Franklin began by passing out a copy of the budget outline. She said that she had some concern about the availability of funds for the Iowa Avenue Literary Walk since a cost has not been set for the project. She spoke about the timing of the project and said that it does have to go to the City Council for approval. The earliest that she would be able to present it to them is March 7th. A letter could then go out to the artists on March 8th if the council approved the project. She said she would anticipate a four-week period for the artists to prepare their proposal with the deadline of April 10th. Each artist would have two block faces in the three blocks of Iowa Avenue. The selection would then take place sometime within two weeks after the proposals are displayed for a week. The selection could be done by the committee because using a panel is always at the committee's discretion. She said this means that the committee could not count on having their work done until May 1. The selection would go before the City Council on May 2nd. Franklin noted that this does create a problem with the construction plans that will be done by this time. Fosse noted that Phase I would be bid and under construction by this time. The sidewalks will not be in place. He also explained that construction plans for Phase II would be well under way for the 100 and 200 blocks, Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes February 3, 2000 Page 2 Franklin said that the concept may need to be confined to the sidewalk and two colored bands that define a corridor in the sidewalk. Fosse explained that the lay out will consist of 4x4' panels of concrete. There will be a primary pedestrian corridor throughout that will be two panels wide and flanked by two colored bands of concrete. They are anticipated to be dark gray in color. Tree grates and lighting will also be included. The pattern will be completed in all three blocks. Fosse noted that the constructibility issues are difficult to define. If there is something that is contiguous and meandering there will be a very different cost than something that can be substituted for one of the 4x4' panels. He suggested that the committee also needs to think about if the project will be long-term and continuous or a finalized completed project. Franklin then confirmed with Fosse that the final drawings will be available for March 8th to send out with the invitation. This will allow the artists to understand what they will be working with in a conceptual manner. Franklin outlined the time schedule as follows: Public review: April 10-14 Selection: April 17 Council Decision: May 2 Franklin then noted that the construction of this project would take place in CY2001 and overlap into FY 2001-2002. Given assumed expenses and an anticipated $75,000 allocation for FY2001 and FY2002, there would be $161,974.80 in the Public Art budget through FY2002. This assumes no other new projects are undertaken. Purington inquired if less concrete was used could it be used for the artwork. Franklin said that she would guess that if it would decrease the concrete cost already included in the budget an argument could be made. Fosse said he did not think it would be significant. He said the labor component would go up in boxing out the panels. Purington said she felt that the projects were being pushed in terms of time and budget. Franklin said that due to the construction plans there is a push in time because it is important to plan for the project prior to the construction in the Spring of 2001. If there is a delay so that the construction plans have to be put on hold or revised prior to letting bids it would mean that the consultants would have to be paid a larger fee. If it can be resolved at this point to determine how it will interface with the construction plans then it would workable with the consultants. Hudson did make a request that when handouts are given to committee members they would have a date and the source of who is supplying the information. Purington inquired as to when the committee would know about the budget. Franklin said there is a public hearing on February 29t~. The council will likely vote on March 7t~. Purington then suggested when the information goes to the artist a budget could be included. Vermillion said that it would be easier to offer a fixed amount of money. Purington agreed this would simplify the process. Hudson inquired about public/private partnerships. This could include other areas to be developed along the corridor that would allow for a greater expenditures. Franklin noted that in other projects this has taken place. Projects like the ScanIon Gym and the soccer field had private donations. Fosse said that the university is putting in $1.5 for the streetscape project. Vermillion suggested that the university should be approached to support the literary walk. Franklin said that she has advised Larry Wilson of the project. Personally he was very interested in the project. She said she would talk to Larry first; funding decisions would ultimately be made by others. Vermillion said she felt that it would be very appropriate as it is a student area and would enhance their lives immensely. She suggested that the city present their budgeted amount to Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes February 3, 2000 Page 3 the university and ask for a contribution from the university. Franklin also noted when another entity is added to any project it does complicate things in completing the project in a constrained timeframe; however she believes it is prudent to include the other interested parties. Vermillion said that she would like to see a budget set for the project and whatever additional funds could be collected towards the Iowa Avenue project it would be help the public art budget. Franklin commented regarding pursuing pdvate businesses along Iowa Avenue. She said she felt it would be a function of the committee. Trueblood noted some businesses were opposed to the Iowa Avenue Streetscape Project. Vermillion asked which ones. Franklin noted that Iowa Book and Supply and Joe's Place were the two businesses who were primarily opposed to the streetscape project. Hudson said if the business is a lease business one could approach both the landowner and tenant for a donation. Vermillion thought she would be able to contact Iowa Book and Supply. Hanick suggested that publishers could also be approached for some contributions as this project would be an enhancement of their business. Vermillion suggested $10-20K per block face for the project. Purington suggested $120K for the project. Trueblood said he felt the $120K would be workable over a two-year period. The committee agreed on this amount for the project. It would be presented to each artist as $10- 20K per block. Nagle inquired if one person would be asked to design one concept. Franklin clarified that three artists would be selected to do both sides of each block. The literature would provide the cohesiveness of the project. Vermillion said that once the artists are selected the committee could suggest that a meeting take place between the artists. Nagle said that he would like to go on record as saying that he believes it is a mistake to not have one person design the theme of the walk. He believes something needs to be done to tie the blocks together. Vermillion said she felt that the committee members need more confidence in their ability to select artists whose work will be compatible. The committee does have the option of rejecting proposals. Vermillion commented that it would be wonderful to have a literary festival once this project is completed. Nagle and Fosse left the meeting at 4:35PM. DISCUSSION OF MANAGEMENT OF COMMISSIONS Purington stated she has concerns regarding the management of commissions. She said that in the beginning with the fountain project she had concerns with the manner in which it would be coordinated. An example Purington gave is the swale that was discussed at great lengths. Now it looks like a berm with water draining down the street. She said she would like to know where the decision to make a change came about. Franklin said she would like to defer on the fountain issue until Fosse is present. Purington said the issue of management will take place again with upcoming projects. Franklin said this will take place every time there is an art project integrated with something else. However, she felt the first project was probably the most difficult because it involves water and mechanics in addition to art. In retrospect the fountain probably was not a very good idea for a first project. The one thing that Franklin said she has learned is that there has to be explicit direction in terms of who is prescribed what responsibility within a contract. Purington said she would like to see someone who could serve as a consultant on these projects who would bring all parties together. She said she felt money is ill-spent if a project has problems, Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes February 3, 2000 Page 4 Franklin then asked what type of person Purington would anticipate to oversee a project. She said that with the Iowa Avenue Parking Garage there is engineering staff who does periodic walk-throughs for the project. In other projects consultants have been hired who coordinate plans based on drawings. Drawings are reviewed by engineering staff on projects as well. Contracting another person would be a redundancy for some of these areas. Franklin said in reference to the fountain the position that has been taken is that the oversight of the project by the designer was insufficient. The designer will reject this idea. Purington asked if the committee could review design changes in these cases and Franklin said she did not believe so. In this case the issue was hydrology and grade. This is an engineering issue. Franklin stated she did not believe a committee would necessarily have the skills to deal with such an issue. Franklin noted that the management of commissions may be a valuable idea. Purington said that she does hope that the intentions of the committee are carried out to the level of excellence that the committee expects. Purington said she felt somewhat responsible for this project. Franklin said that in these projects people are hired with the expectation that a product will be delivered that meets the standard of excellence. When it is not delivered as expected one would expect to have the item replaced to meet the standards. Franklin then commented that she does encourage the committee to continue to pursue a half- time or full-time person to support the work of this program. Trained staff support is not available presently. Purington said it is important to have someone who can interface with artists and understand the nature of the business. LITERARY SELECTION Hanick thanked the committee for including him as a suggestion for the selection committee. He suggested that some of the high school English teachers would be a good option. Tom Yates and Jack Kennedy were his recommendations. Another option is Frank Paluka. Mr. Paluka actually started the Iowa Authors collections. His successors could also be considered. Hanick then inquired what the timeline is for this part of the project. Franklin said as soon as possible and suggested the selection committee should consist of seven people. Hanick said he thought it would be very difficult to define what is in the best interest of the project to have the various authors included. Hanick volunteered to manage the enlistment of committee members. Vermillion left the meeting at 5:02 PM. SCULPTURE SELECTIONS A meeting was set for Wednesday, February 9 to review slides for the remainder of the pedestrian mall sculpture pads. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:10 PM. Minutes submitted by Le Ann Dunne-Tyson. ppddir/min/art2-3-OO.doc PRELIMINARy IOWA CITY PUBLIC ART ADVISORY COMMITTEE THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2000, 3:00 PM Subject to Approval CIVIC CENTER LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Nancy Purington, Rick Fosse, Emily Vermillion, Sandra Hudson, Terry Trueblood, Gary Nagle MEMBERS ABSENT: None (Hansen resigned) STAFF PRESENT: Karin Franklin, Joyce Carroll t OTHERS PRESENT: John Kenyon- Iowa City Gazette CALL TO ORDER Purington called the meeting to order at 3:06 P.M. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA None CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 20,2000, MEETING Deferred to future meeting. REVIEW OF REMAINING SLIDES FOR DOWNTOWN PEDESTRIAN MALL SCULPTURE PADS Franklin began by confirming that the artists selected for the north entrance were Bonner, Wiegman and Spath; on the west end were Bengston, Ellison, Teich and Gerhke for the competition. This meeting the committee focused on figurative artists. The committee then reviewed slides and rated the following artists with 60 points being the maximum number of points possible: Gary Aslum-45 Tom & Lea Anne Askman-45 Chris Bennett-32 Joy Brown-18 Peter Busby-29 Muriel Castanis-12 Tim Cherry-30 Dee Clements-38 Jane Dedecker-37 R. Eckstrand-24 Denny Haskew-19 Gregg Johnson-30 Valery Kovalev-17 Tuck Langland-34 John Leon-31 Janice Lewellen-24 Gino Miles-34 Leo Osborne-34 Karla Runquist-18 Kent UIIberg-26 Esther Werthheimer-42 Shaun Cassidy-19 Perci Chester-18 Jim Collins-10 Michelle Greene-15 Scott Wallace-9 All artists receiving a score below thirty-four were eliminated. Nagle left the meeting at 3:50PM. Purington expressed her concern that no Iowa artists were included in this group. She also commented that she believes that the directions to the artists need to be very clear as she has found that artists tend to sometimes wander in producing their work. The committee discussed the fact that a number of known Iowa artists did not apply for the call. Vermillion said that a lot of artists are simply too busy with commissions and do not respond to calls. Purington commented that the attitude of some artists is that there is no need for them to apply in Iowa and never get selected. Vermillion noted that she thought many artists would say the same thing of their home state. Purington said she felt that if there is no Iowa artist the call would have to be re-opened. Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes February 9, 2000 Page 2 Hudson reminded the committee that the previous selections for the call had been quite monolithic. The artists being considered at this meeting would hopefully provide a range of choices to meet the community's taste as these artists' work were more figurative in nature than the artists previously selected. Vermillion noted that when a figurative artist is chosen the artist should not be chosen for figurative sake, but that the style of the work is complimentary to the abstract work that has already been selected. Comments on the artists were made as follows: Aslum- Askman- Vermillion commented that the Askmans' workmanship was better than that of Alsum in the way they utilized the material while incorporating it into the work. She felt the Askmans were better sculptors. Vermillion found that they took figurative pieces and added cleverness to them. The cleverness came in the way the pieces were posed. Hudson did not find emotion in the Askmans' work; while Purington did not find the work to be joyful. Clements- Vermillion found some of Clements' work to be technically superb, but overdone. Dedecker- In Dedecker's work Vermillion found the materials to be true to the emotion. The material related well to the piece. She found the work to allow the viewer to use their imagination as the features on the pieces are not immediately evident. Purington noted movement or gesture that suggests energy. Lan.aland- Eliminated in the second round. Miles- Vermillion said that she saw ~uidity in his work and this artist could take an abstract form and give it life. She noted his work with horses was exceptional. This artist added depth to pieces. Miles was eliminated in the second round. Osborne- Vermillion found his work to be exquisite. Purington concurred with Vermillion. It was decided that this artist be eliminated in the second round because the committee found the materials to not be conducive for the outside sculptures. Wertheimer- Hudson commented that she loved the motion and whimsicalness in the work. Vermillion said she thought that it was a person who found a style although not being good at doing figurative pieces. Trueblood said he felt there needs to be something that kids and adults will relate to. Vermillion noted that in her experience kids relate better to the abstract. She also commented that this artist could provide a woman artist as an option. The final selection for the figurative artists to compete was made as follows: Plav.around West Dedecker Alsum Wertheimer It was decided that the Askmans would be included in the competition for the north pad. Mitchell, who was considered at the previous meeting, would be included in the competition for the playground, Caricoff was cut from the competition in this meeting. The committee also made the decision to reserve the pad by the planter for another competition for an Iowa artist. Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee Minutes February 9, 2000 Page 3 Vermillion left the meeting at 4:57PM. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjoumed at 5:25PM. Minutes submitted by Le Ann Dunne-Tyson. ppddir/min/a't2-9-00,doc MINUTES RIVERFRONT AND NATURAL AREAS COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1999 IOWA CITY MAIN LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: . Lynn Rose, David Thayer, Larry Wilson, Jeff Gillitzer (late), Kathy Janz, Kevin Kacena, Russell Bennett, Gretchen Grimm MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Graham OTHERS PRESENT: Terry Dahms :~ , . CALL TO ORDER Chairperson Rose called the meeting to order at 5:35 P.M. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 20, 1999, MEETING Neumann noted that Melody Rockwell from the Planning Department had some additions to the North Planning District portion. Her additions were as follows: In the fourth paragraph Rockwell wanted to say "in the south central district along HWY 1 ". On the last page in the fourth to the last paragraph in the third sentence that said "there will be no development in the area"; the words "flood plain" will be added before the word "area". Wilson moved to approve the minutes and Thayer seconded the motion. The minutes were approved on a 7-0 vote. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA Terry Dahms attended the meeting representing FIRST and wanted to acknowledge the support that the commission has given FIRST. He stated that over recent years there has been significant work done on bicycle trails and now the issues of connectivity are beginning to be addressed. Dahms went on to say that on the previous evening the regional trails and bicycle subcommittee had met to review the applications for State Transportation Enhancement funds. There were twelve applications making approximately $3M in requests. There is only $300K available for disbursement; which makes the dealsions very difficult. He went on the say that this points out that there is a lot of work to be done and there is not enough money for the projects. Dahms indicated that there has started to be some movement towards addressing some of the issues outside of Iowa City and some of the same immense problems exist. However, the DOT is starting to shift their support of trails. He went on to say that at the governor's level there have been meetings regarding the farm land protection bill which limits trail development. He concluded by thanking the commission for their support and asked them to be aware of the activities at the state level. Gillitzer joined the meeting at 5:45 PM. Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission Minutes December 15, 1999 Page 2 RFPORT FROM JCCOG RI=GIONAI TRAIl S AND RICYCLING COMMITTIPF Gdmm began by stating that the committee discussed what they were going to recommend for enhancement funding to the JCCOG Tran~sportation Technical Advisory Committee. The recommendations for projects were as follows: HWY 965/North Liberty Trail development Clear Creek trail development Oakdale Blvd trail development Butler House trail development Willow Creek TraiI-HWY 1 to Riverside Ddve Bus Bike Racks Dahms, who is also on the JCCOG Committee, stated that Michelle Ribble from the university was at the meeting. She said that the university did not want to put the bike racks on the campus buses because the buses have to make tight turns. By extending the buses out another three feet it could cause problems for inexperienced drivers. There also was the feeling that once someone gets to campus there is already a faidy well developed sidewalk system. There would be twenty-three buses for Iowa City and eleven for Coralville. Dahms then said that the committee did not endorse funding amounts, but the technical advisory committee would debate the dollar amounts for the endorsed projects. He went on to say that these funds are TEA-21 money that must be used for non-road type of enhancements. There are surface transportation funds that could possibly be used for these types of projects, but it does not generally happen. Grimm said that the Butler House was discussed. An outside restroom facility and parking is being proposed in order to make the Butler House a trail head. The dty has currently spent $60K to mothball the Butler House and are hoping to get federal funds for restoration of the building. Dahms stated that the reason this was recommended was because there is limited parking in the area. The whole vision behind the Butler House is that it will eventually be an attraction for people to get off the interstate as it has historical significance. Kacena asked if there are plans for the trail going north of the Butler House. Neumann indicated that the county would pick up the trail and take it over the bridge and follow Dubuque Street. Janz inquired about the trail crossing the bridge as it is a dangerous area for biking. Neumann said that building a separate bridge is an expensive item and he does not see it as a separate project. Dahms said that it looks like the model that is starting to be used is what was done on Prairie du Chien Road. It is the situation that appears to be a win-win for everyone. It is a better engineered road and provides room for bicycles, walkers and farm equipment. He said he sees it as the DOT's way of addressing the need for more trails. This is not ideal, but a compromise. Grimm said that she disagreed with this. She totally disagreed with this idea as Prairie du Chien was one of the beautiful country roads. In ten years from now there will not be anything like this and our country roads will be a thing of the past. Bennett said there are plans to re-plant some of the wildflowers along Prairie du Chien Road. Thayer then commented on all of the entities dealing with the Butler House. He then noted that this commission has in the past had a connection with the Butler House and inquired why RNAC is currently not involved. Neumann said that the Historic Preservation Commission has been attempting to seek funds for restoration. Scott Kugler with the Planning Department asked the Parks and Rec Department for their support in attempting to get a grant. The reason behind this is that once this facility becomes operational and a trailhead the Parks and Rec Department will take care of it. He Riverfront and Natural Areas Commission Minutes December 15, 1999 Page 3 wanted to get their suppod. Neumann went on to say that the funds that they were seeking was approximately $5-6K from a state source to him a consultant to determine the best use of the building as well as to find funds for restoration. Neumann thought that Kugler will want to approach RNAC when funds are found to make plans for the Butler House. FORMATION OF OFFICER NOMINATING COMMITTEE FOR THE YEAR 2000 Rose indicated that she has one additional year in her term and that she does not want to chair the commission for her last year. She stated she was willing to be on the nominating committee and asked for two additional volunteers. Gdmm and Janz indicated that they would like to assist Rose. MEMBERSHIP ISSUES Bennett submitted his resignation from the commission as he is retaining fees from the Parks and Rec Department which is not allowed by the City. The Courtney Daniels (Iowa City) position does have one year remaining on it; however she did not submit a letter of resignation. Neumann said he would speak to the legal department regarding this situation. The county position held by Kacena ended in December; however the county approved the position for three additional years. Kacena said he received a letter and it would pass through the council for approval. The positions for Wilson and Thayer will also end in December. Wilson is not renewing his University of Iowa position and he has recommended Bob Brooks to replace him. Thayer stated that he spoke to Coralville Mayor Jim Fausett regarding his continuation on this commission and the position he holds with the Coralville Parks and Rec Commission. Fosset indicated that he assumed both appointments would go through. Neumann said county, city and university positions need to be filled. Rose indicated that Lod Goetsch might be an Iowa City candidate. CREEK MAINTENANCE SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT AND DISCUSSION Rose started by reminding the commission that Wilson, Gillitzer and Graham represent the subcommittee and they had made a presentation of their outline for the further development of the creek maintenance program. She said she would like to see the subcommittee as an ongoing entity. Rose then went on to say that Janz had approached her and indicated that she lives in the Hickory Hill Park area and she is noticing that the creek is cutting into the park area. She had asked if something could be done about this. Rose then commented that this very problem fits well into the recommendations that were sent to Public Works; particularly where there would be a public demonstration project that was directly applicable to creek side maintenance issues. This could be an oppodunity to engage Public Works and show them that the commission can make the creek maintenance plan work. This also would provide a platform to enact the vision that is being discussed. Janz then said that she is willing to spend a substantial amount of administrative time to work on an educational project. She went on the say that Rick Fosse had said that the city would be willing to direct $15K to start the project and Janz suggested perhaps contacting Johnson County Public Health as they may be another source for matching funds. She also said that other entities such as the Soil and Conservation Commission, Parks and Rec and city engineers should be involved. There is also money at the state level in terms of water quality monitoring. Mayor's Youth Development is also interested in terms of work reducing labor cost and The Friends of Hickory Hill are willing to do some Riverfront end Natural Areas Commission Minutes December 15, 1999 Page 4 volunteer work. Janz also noted that she was planning to meet with Terry Trueblood to inform him of the project idea. Wilson said that he thought it was a tremendous idea. He suggested contacting Wayne Peterson and chose the appropriate site based on the funds available. He also suggested contacting Chds Talega with the county soil conservation office. Bennett then injected a note of cautio'n that with'any major renovations heavy equipment may be needed to make extensive changes. He went on to say that there are problems because of the psychology related to the park. Janz then commented that she understood and agreed with Bennett. She would like this project to lead the way by ading in an environmentally fdendly fashion. Gillitzer said that if a project can not be done in a friendly way in the park landowners will not give the access necessary to creek beds that border private property. He went on to say that this needs to be the showcase for pdvate property owners to show them that this can be done without tearing up land. Wilson said he believed the challenge is to improve the deteriorated properties without damaging the environment. Maybe the stream will not be restored to its ultimate condition and this will be the compromise. Janz said it also says something about the commission being able to make its vision a reality. She sees the first priority is to preserve the environmental integrity of the park. Gillitzer noted that he has watched the council deal with the annexation of the cemetery. He feels that sensitivities are high already and he would suggest treading carefully. Janz then went on to say that she does not feel it is a dichotomy in terms Hickory Hill. She does not believe that the environmentalists do not think anything should be done with the park. Rather they think that the needs of the floral and fauna should be priodtized over the idea of multi-use. Access should also be maintained, but consideration should be given to the natural entities. She feels that the environmental advocates would embrace the project and this could mend some fences. Neumann then said that he would talk to Terry Trueblood and Wayne Peterson to see if they would be interested in going to the area to determine an apprepdate site for consideration for the project. Wilson suggested the subcommittee establish goals for the project. Bennett then noted that the true solution to Hickory Hill Park is really upstream from the park. There is uncontrolled flow somewhere upstream. The land above it needs to be controlled and it could solve the problem in Hickory Hill. Then Wilson suggested if the solution is not in the park then landowners up stream should be contacted to try to draw them into the project. It was agreed that a subcommittee, consisting of Janz, Gillitzer and Graham, would meet to establish goals. OTHER Neumann noted that orientation for Janz and Kacena would take place in January. ADJOURNMENT Rose adjourned the meeting at 6:50 PM. Minutes submitted by Le Ann Dunne-Tyson. jccogtp/minh-tbcl 2-15-99. doc