Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-11-10 Info Packet j - j. CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET CITY OF IOW,~ CITY www.icgov.org November 10, 2005 NOVEMBER 44 WORK SESSION ITEMS IP1 Council Meetings and Work Session Agendas Revised Council Meetings and Work Session Schedule [Distributed at 11/15 formal meeting] IP2 Memorandum from JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner: Proposed traffic calming on Kennedy Parkway IP3 Memorandum from the Community and Economic Development Coordinator: CDBG/HOME Investment Policy IP4 Memorandum from the Community and Economic Development Coordinator: Location Policy for HCDC Allocations MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS IP5 Email from Susan Judkins: Invitation to 11/22 City/County Legislative Forum IP6 Letter from JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner to Residents on Morningside Drive between 7th Avenue and College Street: Meeting to discuss traffic calming on Morningside Drive IP7 Police Department Use of Force Report - October 2005 ~.-_---=f;;~=;_-~=~__~_ CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET CITY OF IOWA CITY ww~v.icgov.org November 10, 2005 14 WORK SESSION ITEMS NOVEMBER IP1 Council :ings and Work Session Agendas IP2 Memorandum m JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner: Pro traffic calming on Kennedy IP3 Memorandum from Community and Economic Developm Coordinator: CDBG/HOME Investment Policy IP4 Memorandum from the unity and Economic Devel¢ ;nt Coordinator: Location Policy for HCDC Allocations IP5 Email from Susan Judkins: Ir Legislative Forum IP6 Letter from JCCOG Traffic Engineenng tuner to Residents on Momingside Drive between 7th Avenue and College Street: iscuss traffic calming on Morningside Drive port - ~ber 2005 ~ City Council Meeting Schedule and CiTY OF Iow^CITY Work Session Agendas November 15, 2005 www.icgov.org TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15 Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00p Regular Formal Council Meeting WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 16 REVISED Emma J. Harvat Hall l:00p-3:00p Continued discussion of Zoning Code · TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22 Public Library 7:00p State League meeting with area legislators on Property Tax Legislation - Public Library e MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28* Emma J. Harvat Hall 4:30p-6:30p Local Legislators/option to December 3 · TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29 Emma J. Harvat Hall TBA Orientation 200512006 City Councils · SATURDAY, DECEMBER 3* Emma J. Harvat Hall TBA Local Legislators (option to November 28) (special start time TBA afternoon) · MONDAY, DECEMBER 12 Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:30p Special Council Work Session · TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13 Emma J. HarvatHall 7:00p Special Formal Council Meeting *Date not confirmed City Council Meeting Schedule and CITY OF IOWA CITY Work Session Agendas November 9, 2005 www.icgov.org , MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14 Emma J. Harvat Hall 4:00p Regular Council Work Session · Kennedy Parkway Traffic Calming Proposal Dinner · ~DBG Investment Policy Provided · Policy for HCDC Allocations · Ac ida Items · il Time · Schedule · Ind Zoning Items · Zoning Discussion / / / / Emma J. Harvat Hall · TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15 / 7:00p Regular Formal Jncil Meeting / TENTATIVE FL AND AGENDAS · WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 16 Emma J. Harvat Hall l:00p-3:00p GeoComm Radio System ~de Joint Communications Cenl · TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 22 ~i~l: Public Library 7:00p State League meeting ~/th area I tors on Property Tax Legislation - Public/~3rary · MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28* / \~ Emma J. Harvat Hall 4:30p-6:30p Local Legislato~option to December 3~ · TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29 / ~ Emma J. Harvat Hall TBA Orientatio,~005/2006 City Councils \,~, · SATURDAY, DECEMBER 3* ~ '~. Emma J. Harvat Hall TBA Local ~gislators (option to November 28) (sp,~/c~al start time TBA afternoon) · MONDAY, DECEMBER~I2 '~...Emma J. Harvat Hall 6:30p ~3ecial Council Work Session / · , TUESDAY, DECEME~ER 13 _ Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00p / Special Formal Council Meeting *Date not confirmed · MONDAY, JANUARY 2 Emma J. Harvat Hall Date: November 2, 2005 To: City Council From: Anissa Williams, JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner ~ Re: Item for November 14, 2005 City Council work session: Proposed traffic calming on Kennedy Parkway Walnut Ridge subdivision requested Kennedy Parkway be considered for the City's Traffic Calming Program. Upon evaluation, Kennedy Parkway qualified for the traffic calming program based on 85th percentile speeds in excess of 5 mph over the speed limit (25 mph). 85th percentile speeds were between 30 and 39 mph. A meeting with neighborhood residents was held in October. The residents' preferred option for traffic calming on Kennedy Parkway was speed humps. A neighborhood survey was conducted and sent to 81 affected households. Based on the adopted City Traffic Calming Program, the survey included all "affected" households. Since this is a dead end street, all residents of Walnut Ridge received a survey except for Acorn Court residents. Acorn Court residents would be able to travel to and from their homes without encountering a speed hump. The neighborhood response to the survey was 48 in favor and 8 opposed. That is an 86% majority, clearly above the traffic calming program criterion of a 60% majority. A total of 63 postcards out of 81 sent were returned. There was one disqualified double vote, and 6 vacant properties. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers speed hump design guidelines, Kennedy Parkway will need 18 speed humps. This is based on spacing designed to keep speeds in the 25-30 mph range. Based on previous installations, the average price for a single speed hump is $1500-$1800. The cost for the entire project will be approximately $27,000 to $32,400. This will exceed the remaining traffic calming budget available for FY06. We started the year with $30,000 and have a current balance of $22,530.00. City of Iowa City Police, Fire, Transit and Streets Departments and Johnson County Ambulance were asked to provide comments on this proposal. All indicated they do not have concerns with this project. Please indicate at the November 14th Work Session how you would like to proceed. If directed accordingly, we will proceed with the public comment period and include a resolution for construction of the speed humps on the December 13, 2005 City Council formal meeting. If approved by City Council, the speed humps will be installed in spring 2006. A year after installation, we would conduct another traffic study and survey of the neighborhood to see if the residents want the speed humps to remain in place. Bring any questions to the November 14th meeting. cc: Steve Atkins Jeff Davidson Karin Franklin Marcia Klingaman Rick Fosse Ron Knoche jccogtp/mem/kennedyprkwy-traffcalm.doc IP3 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 8, 2005 TO: City Council o~r~~ FROt4: Steven Nasby, Community and Economic Development Coordinat RE: CDBG\HOME Investment Policy At the November 14 work session the matter of the CDBG\HOME Investment Policy is scheduled for discussion. Specifically, as it relates to Habitat for Humanity. At your last meeting the Council had received correspondence and input. When this policy was discussed, and subsequently approved, the intent was that it would apply to the current FY06 projects and the upcoming FY07 allocation round. For your information, attached is a copy of the approved CDBG\HOME Investment Policy. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 356-5248 or via e-mail at Steven-Nasby@iowa-city.org. Cc: HCDC Karin Franklin, Director of Planning and Community Development Attachment Prepared by: Steven Nasby, Community & Economic Dev. Coordinator, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5248 RESOLUTION NO. 05-213 RESOLUTION ADOPTING IOWA CITY'S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM (HOME) INVESTMENT POLICIES. WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, allows the City of Iowa City, Iowa, flexibility on the allocation and investment of CDBG and HOME funds; and WHEREAS the Iowa City City Council has discussed investment policies for the use of CDBG and HOME funds; and WHEREAS the Iowa City City Council wishes to establish specific policies for public facilities, public service, housing and economic.development activities; and WHEREAS the FY06 Annual Action Plan containing the allocation of CDBG and HOME funds was approved by Resolution 05-169; and WHEREAS adoption of the CDBG and HOME investment policies defined herein are applicable to FY06 and future CDBG and HOME funded projects; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the public interest will be served by the adoption of CDBG and HOME investment policies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, THAT: 1. The City of Iowa City City Council hereby approves and adopts the CDBG and HOME investment policies shown in Exhibit A. 2. CDBG and\or HOME projects funded in FY2005 and years prior thereto are not affected by the adoption of this resolution and changes to the terms of those agreements will not be entertained. 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute, terminate or amend CDBG and\or HOME Agreements entered into in connection with the allocation of public funds with subrecipients, Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs) or other legal entities. PasSed and approved this 2].st day of .)'uae ., 2005. CITY CLERK City Attorney's Office Resolution No. 05-213 Page 2 It was moved by Bailey and seconded by 0'Donne%% ...... the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: X Bailey X Champion X Elliott X Lehman x O'Donnell X Vanderhoef Wilbum X Exhibit A CDBG and HOME Program Investment Policies IEconomlc Development Economic development projects making application to the CDBG Economic Development Fund will be reviewed by the Council Economic Development Committee. The Coundl Economic Development Committee will make a recommendation to the City Coundl for each project proposed for funding. Said recommendation shall include the amount of CDBG assistance to be allocated and the terms of Investment. Typically, for-profit business projects will receive Iow-interest loans; whereas, non-profits may be recommended for forgivable loans or grants. Decisions regarding investment terms for economic development projects will be made based on the nature of the project induding, but not limited to, the risk, potential for growth, the number of and quality of jobs created for Iow-moderate Income persons, the ability to repay a loan and the amount of other funding leveraged. Housinc~ The interest rate for all rental housing activities will be zero percent (0%) for non-profit owned projects and prime rate (determined at the time the CDBG\HOHE agreement is executed by the City) minus two points for for-profit owned projects with an amortization period up to thirty (30) years or the pedod of affordablllty, whichever is less. Assistance to homeownership projects will have three repayment options as shown herein. 1. A 20-year loan that must be paid In full when the low-moderate InCome homeowner sells, transfers title, moves or rents the property or the 20- year term expires, whichever occurs first. No interest will accrue and no payments will be required to be made by the property owner prior to payoff. 2. The homeowner has the option to make monthly payments to the City or its designee in a form not to exceed a 30-year, zero percent (0%) amortized loan, a 30-year amortized loan must start at the time the assistance is provided.. 3. If CDBG\HOHE assistance is provided to a certified non-profit organization, for a Community Land Trust project, the CDBG\HOHE funds will be in the form of a grant. All HOME funds provided for Tenant Based Rent Assistance will be in the form of a grant. public Facilities The Ob/of Iowa City, as the recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, utilizes these funds for "public facilities" projects as defined in 24 CFR 570.201(c} that are completed by the City and\or subredpents. The following policy applies to CDBG assistance provided to non-governmental subredpients ("governmental" includes only Jurisdictions with taxing authority as provided for in [owa Code). Projects that receive an allocation by the City of Iowa City will receive an earned grant, as defined herein, which will be secured by a mortgage or other comparable security instrument. The compliance term of the earned grant will be determined by the formula also provided herein. At the end of the applicable compliance term the lien or other security instrument will be released by the City. If the real property is leased, the lease shall be for a period th.at matches or exceeds the compliance term of the earned grant. · Earned Grant.: A lien against the real property being assisted, or other comparable security, which is repaid only upon ~r-ansfer of title, rental of the property, or termination of services or occupancy as outlined in the applicable CDBG Agreement. If the subrecipient fully satisfies the terms outlined in the applicable CDBG Agreement the mortgage against the property, or other security instrument, will be released by the City following the completion of the compliance period that begins.on the date of execution of the mortgage or security instrument. E.arned Grant Formula_: The total amount of CDBG assistance allocated to a subreclpient in any one Cityf~scal year for a "public facility "project divided by $3,000 equals the number of CDBG compliance years for the Earned Grant. (For example: $17,000 in CDBG assistance divided by $3,000 would equal a compliance term of S.67 years or 68 months). If the Earned Grant Formula results in a compliance term of less than one year (12 months) the minimum compliance term shall be one year (12 month.s) and if the Earned Grant Formula results in a compliance term of more than ninety-nine (99} years the maximum compliance term shall be ninety-nine(99) years. Public Service projects as defined in 24 CFR 570.201 (e) shall receive CDBG assistance In the form of a grant with a term of not less than one year. MEMORANDUM DATE: November 10, 2005 TO: City Council FROM: Steven Nasby, Community and Economic Development Coordinator(t-~~ ~ RE: CDBG and\or HOME Funded Housing - Location Considerations On October 17 the Scattered Site Housing Task Force (SSHTF) presented their final report to the City Council. At this meeting a request was made by Matt Hayek, representing the Housing and Community Development Commission (HCDC), which the City Council provides guidance regarding the allocation of FY07 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and\or HOME Investment Partnerships Program funding by December 1. To aid with this discussion the following are the two most recent CDBG\HOME funding cycle guidelines and the SSHTF recommendation. Scattered Site Housinq Task Force SSHTF provided a 'Fair Share' matrix and map (see attached); however, this recommendation also stated that using this tool in distributing assisted housing must be accompanied with financial resources in addition to CDBG and HOME funds so that a reduction in the supply of assisted housing does not occur. As such, if no additional funds are provided the SSHTF did not recommend this method of distribution, which would leave all areas of the community open to additional assisted housing. FY06 CDBG\HOME Application Cycle "To encourage the distribution of housing and res/dent/a/fac/i/ties (e.g. permanent housing - renta/and homeownersh/p, transit/ona/housing, home/ess she/ters, and spec/a/needs housing), HCDC and the City Counc// w/ii cons/der potent/a/impacts on elementary schoo/ districts." lin practice, the FY06 projects that identified a location or locations within the application were reviewed by HCDC and the City Council at the time of the approval of the Annual Action Plan (May 2005). Projects that did not identify a location(s) are subject on a case- by-case review by the City Council prior to the City entering into a CDBG or HOME Agreement. FY05 CDBG\HOME Application Cycle "To encourage the distribution of housing or res/dent/a/fad#t/es (e.g. permanent housing - renta/ and homeownersh/p, trans/t/ona/ housing, home/ess she/rets, and spec/a/needs housing), HCDC and the C/bi Counc// w/ii consider potent/a/impacts on e/ementary schoo/ d/'str/cts. Attached, as Appendix B, is a i/sting of the/ow-moderate income rates of the ZCCSD by building. Housing projects that propose a/ocation or locations within e/ementary schoo/ districts that are over the ZCCSD average of 20%/ow-moderate income students may be den/ed for funding or other support by HCDC or the C/bi Counc//. " November 10, 2005 Page 2 This policy provided a specific basis for the location criteria and lead to HCDC and City Council review of projects on an individual basis. The projects were reviewed either at the time of application or later within the fiscal year upon the identification of real property by the applicant. The HCDC will be finalizing the FY07 CDBG and HOME application materials on November :~7. To assist them with the development of these documents a clear direction, if any is to be given, as to the location of assisted housing is necessary. We anticipate that the FY07 CDBG\HOME funding round will begin with the availability of applications on December 5. l~f the location of CDBG\HONE funded housing is a matter the Council wishes to address, the following are three possible options for consideration. 1. No location criteria for publicly assisted housing. · Publicly funded housing could be acquired, rehabilitated or constructed in any part of the community (subject to applicable zoning and building codes). 2. Use of the SSHTF "Fair Share" map and matrix with additional city funding. · Assisted housing would be encouraged (though City support and\or funding) within the areas of the community identified as "underserved" by the SSHTF. This option would also include the allocation of additional funds (outside of CDBG\HOME) to off-set actual increased costs of locating housing in these areas. 3. Use of the SSHTF "Fair Share" map and matrix without additional City funding. · Assisted housing would be encouraged (though City support and\or funding) within the areas of the community identified as "underserved" by the SSHTF. No additional City funds would be provided to these projects to off-set increase costs of locating housing in these areas. This option may reduce the number of assisted housing units that are produced through acquisition, redevelopment or construction. 4. Case-by-case review of projects by the City Council. · This is a continuation of the existing policy regarding CDBG\HOME funded projects. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 356-5248 or via e-mail at Steven-Nasby@iowa-city.orq. Attachment Cc: HCDC City Manager Karin Franklin, Director of Planning & Community Development TABLE 2 Fair Share Assisted Housing Units Based on Percentage of All Housing in Each C'FtBG All Assisted Units (Owner and Renter) Column I Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Column 5 Column 6 Column 7 Column 8 Column 9' Census Block 2000 Census 2000-2004 Bldg Total N~mber of Percent of All Housing Number of Percent of Assisted Over~nder Tract Group All Housin.q Units Permits (# of units) Housing Units Units n C'I'tBG Assisted Units Units in C1'~G Fair Sham I I 935 88 1023 3.56% 4 0.39% Under I 2 1018 90 1108 3.85% 38 3.43% Under 4 I 2327 486 2813 9.79% 392 13.94% Over 5 1 4 0 4 0.01% 0 0.00% Under 5 2 2652 293 2945 10.25% 21 0.71% Under 6 I 1812 7 1819 6.33% 9 0.49% Under 11 I 833 8 841 2.93% 30 3.57% Over 11 2 929 18 947 3,29% 14 1.48% Under 12 I 398 2 400 1.39% 14 3.50% Over 12 2 499 5 504 1.75% 4 0,79% Under 13 I 681 59 740 2.57% 13 1.76% Under 13 2 523 3 526 1.83% 9 1.71% Under 14 I 281 0 281 0.98% 6 2.14% Over 14 2 713 26 739 2.57% 90 12.18% Over 14 3 909 144 1053 3.66% 28 2.66% Under 15 I 709 2 711 2.47% 10 1.41 % Under 15 2 572 8 580 2.02% 16 2.76% Over 16 I 1602 73 1675 5.83% 15 0.90% Under 16 2 1372 3 1375 4.78% 81 5.89% Over 17 1 455 1 456 1.59% 21 4.61% Over 17 2 346 2 348 1.21% 3 0.86% Under 17 3 545 11 556 1.93% 13 2.34% Over 18 I 1794 420 2214 7.70% 102 4.61% Under 18 2 1389 123 1512 5.26% 162 10.71% Over 21 I 14 0 14 0.05% 0 0.00% Under 21 2 612 139 751 2.61% 104 13.85% Over 23 I 430 30 460 1.60% I 0.22% Under 23 2 784 2 786 2.73% 0 0.00% Under 23 3 5 0 5 0.02% 0 0.00% Under 104 4 627 0 627 2,18% 0 0.00% Under 105 I 31~3 61~8 93_...[1 3.24% 7..~6 8-16% Over Iowa City Totals 26083 2661 28744 100.00% 1276 4.44% Note: 'Assisted' units include rental and owner-occupied housing units that received public funds. This does not include Housing Choice V~ Program (a.k.a. Section 8) units. ' The 'Over~,Uncler' Fair Share in column 9 is determined by the data in columns 6 and 8. If the percentage in column 8 is greater than the percen~ge in column J~ then the census block group is 'Ove~' its Fair Share and if the percentage in column 8 is less than the percentage in column 6 the census block group is 'Under' Its Fair Share and is tacking assisted housing opportuni'des. Scattered Site Housing Task Force October 3, 2005 Areas that are underserved wi~h affordable housing opportunities IP5 Marian Karr From: Susan Judkins [$usanJudkins@iowalea§ue.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 2:53 PM To: Kelly Hayworth; jfausett@ci.coralville.ia.us; nbeuter@ci.coralville.ia.us; SteveAtkins; Marian Kart; bjames@ci.north-liberty.ia.us; mmitchell@ci.north-liberty.ia.us; jrdowd@netins.net; dbenson@netins.net; schleisman@iowatelecom.net; flol@iowatelecom.net; njoldt@iowatelecom.net; mayor@maharishivediccity.net; cityclerk@maharishivediccity.net; jbrown@fairfieldcityhall.com; mayormalloy@fairfieldcityhall.com; joy@fairfieldcityhall.com; wbcity@lcom.net; dplyman@washingtoniowa.net; winfield@farmtel.net; jrwashclerk@hotmail.com; citywelm@netins.net; riversideiowa@mchsi.com; lisboncityhall@airolink, com; elycity@southslope.net; mtvernonia@mtvernon- ia.com; tracey.mulcahey@solon-iowa.com; cityofsp@netins, net; swisher2@netins.net; uhclerk@yahoo.com; donnlson@intedi Subject: Invitation to '11/22 City/County Legislative Forum Please share the invitation below with mayors, council members and other interested city officials. We hope your city will be interested in participating since a legislator representing your community is likely to attend. The following legislators plan to join us, and others will likely RSVP soon: Senators Joe Bolkcom, Bob Dvorsky, David Miller, Frank Wood Representatives David Heaton, Vicki Lensing Some communities will also be receiving a separate invitation to an EClCOG-sponsored legislative forum to be held in Coralville on November 29th. If you have any questions, please let me know. Susan Judkins Director of Governmental Affairs Iowa League of Cities 515-974-5312 susanjud~ins@iowal_eag ue.or9 http:llwww.iowaleague.org INVITATION Legislative Forum: Key Local Government Issues for 2006 Hosted by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa League of Cities and Iowa State Association of Counties Tuesday, November 22, 2005 Iowa City Library, Room A 123 S Linn St, Iowa City 6:30 PM Reception 7:00 p.m. Program (to be televised) Your attendance is requested at a legislative forum to discuss property tax reform and other key local government issue with city and county officials from your district. The program will be broadcast via public television. Your RSVP allows us to prepare the room appropriately for the broadcast. Please RSVP by contacting Susan Judkins at the Iowa League of Cities at (515) 974-5312 by Tuesday, November 15, 11/8/2005 IP6 CITY OF IOWA CiTY 410 East Washington Street November 10, 2005 Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (:~19) 356-5000 Residents on Morningside Drive between 7th Avenue and College Street (319} 356-5009 FAX www. ict~ov, or8 Re: Meeting to discuss traffic calming on Morningside Drive Dear Resident: The City has received a petition from some of the residents on Morningside Drive between 7th Avenue and College Street to have this portion of Morningside Drive considered for the City's Traffic Calming Program. The City completed a traffic evaluation and determined that this street qualifies for the program based on the 85th-percentile speed of traffic exceeding 5 mph over the posted speed limit of 25 mph. The next step in the traffic calming process is to have a neighborhood meeting to discuss the possible traffic calming measures. The purpose of the meeting is to develop a neighborhood consensus on a preferred traffic calming measure. Examples of traffic calming in your neighborhood include the speed humps on 4th Avenue near Court Street and the traffic circles on College Street and Washington Street near Summit Street. If a consensus can be reached, we will then conduct a survey of residences that would be impacted. The intent of the City's traffic calming program is to install traffic calming features only if that is the desire of the neighborhood. Please consider attending the meeting on: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 7:00 p.m. at City High in the Little Theater 1900 Morningside Drive I expect the meeting to last no more than one hour. If you cannot attend, please feel free to contact me with your comments or questions at 356-5254 or anissa-williams@iowa-city, org. Sincerely, Anissa Williams JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner cc: City Manager City Council .:. Jeff Davidson Karin Franklin Marcia Klingaman Rick Fosse Ron Knoche Bud Stockman John Sobaski jccogtp/Itdmomingside.doc IOWA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT ~,O~kq,,~..j~ USE OF FORCE REPORT ~ October 2005 OFFICER DATE INC # INCIDENT FORCE USED 20,44 100105 49648 Open Container Subject was placed under arrest and resisted handcuffing efforts. Officers attempts to use control techniques were unsuccessful. Officers then exposed the subject to a chemical irritant and used control techniques to place handcuffs on the subject. 95,09 100205 49892 Public Intoxication Subject was placed under arrest and resisted handcuffing efforts. Officers used control techniques to place handcuffs on the subject. 31 100305 50091 Vehicle Pursuit Officers attempted to stop a vehicle reference a welfare check on the driver. The driver failed to yield and a pursuit began. After a short distance the pursuit was discontinued. 36 100605 50573 OWI Subject attempted to assault officers. Officers used control techniques to place handcuffs on the subject. 56 100705 50778 Warrant Service Subject was being arrested for an outstanding warrant. Subject resisted handcuffing efforts. Officers used control techniques to place handcuffs on the subject. 95 100705 50808 Burglary Officers drew sidearms to search a residence after it was reported that an intruder was inside. No one was located. 95 100705 50810 Burglary Officers drew sidearms to search a building after responding there for an alarm and observing forced entry. No one was located. 38 100805 500961 Fight in Progress Subject was involved in a physical altercation and separated from the other party. Subject then attempted to assault another. Officers exposed the subject to a chemical irritant to deter the action. 06,33 100805 50982 Fight in Progress Subject was involved in a physical altercation and separated from the other party. Subject then attempted to assault another. Officers used control techniques to deter the action. 30 100905 51167 Hit and Run Property Subject refused to stop for a traffic Damage Accident violation. A pursuit ensued. After a short distance the vehicle pulled over and the driver was compliant. 18 101505 52148 Bar Check Subject had been placed under arrest and attempted to assault Officers. Officers exposed the subject to a chemical irritant to deter the action. 06,09 101505 52156 PAULA Subject was stopped for an alcohol violation and attempted to run from Officers on foot. Officers used control techniques to take the subject into custody. 81,42,14 101505 52166 Armed Subject Officers responded to a report of an armed subject that was in another's residence. Officer drew sidearms to search the residence for the subject. No one was located. 95 101505 52178 Disorderly Conduct Subjects were involved in a physical fight. Officers used control techniques to separate the subjects. 38,81 101605 52399 Assault Subject was placed under arrest and resisted handcuffing efforts. Officers used control techniques to place handcuffs on the subject. 03,58 101605 52428 Domestic Subject attempted to assault an Officer. Officers exposed the subject to a chemical irritant and used control techniques to deter the act and take the subject into custody. 19 102005 53222 Domestic Incident Subject fled on foot from Officers. Officer caught up with the subject and used control techniques to direct the subject to the ground and place them in handcuffs. 13 102205 53773 Assault Subject assaulted a Police Officer. Officers used control techniques to deter the assault, direct the subject to the ground, and place them in handcuffs. 58,55 102305 53879 Fight in Progress Officers used control techniques to separate two subjects that were in a physical altercation. One subject was exposed to a chemical irritant to facilitate this. After exposure this subject the fled on foot. Officers caught up with the subject and used control techniques to direct them to the ground and place them in handcuffs. 58 102305 53879 Fight in Progress Officers used control techniques to separate two subjects that were involved in a physical altercation. One subject was exposed to a chemical irritant to facilitate this. 59 102505 54249 Fight in Progress Subject was involved in a physical altercation on a city bus. Officers told the subject to leave the bus. Subject refused. Officers used control techniques to escort the subject off of the bus. 59,16 102505 54264 Fight in Progress Subject was involved in a physical altercation and was placed under arrest. Subject resisted handcuffing efforts. Officers used control techniques to place the subject in handcuffs. 31 102805 54662 Domestic Incident Subject fled on foot from Officers. Officer caught up with the subject and used control techniques to direct the subject to the ground and place them in handcuffs. 13 102805 54753 Welfare Check Subject attempted to assault a Police Officer. Officers used control techniques to deter the act and take the subject into custody. 31 102905 55077 Disorderly Conduct Subjects were blocking an entrance/exit to an establishment and refused to move. Officers gave verbal directives for subjects to move along. One subject refused. Officers used control techniques to move the subject away from the door.