HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-09-25 Info Packet of 9/13 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
September 13, 2001
www.icgov.org
I MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS I
IP1 Meeting Schedule and Tentative Work Session Agendas
IP2 Liquor Establishments with Space Not on the Ground Floor and Occupancy
Loads
IP3 Memorandum from Assistant City Manager: Gas/Electric Franchise Renewal
IP4 Letter from Randy Brown (Mediacom) to Cable TV Administrator: @Home
Service Rate Changes
IP5 Letter from Dennis Griffith (Iowa City Babe Ruth League) to Parks and Recreation
Director: Appreciation
IP6 Email from Tam/Shaw to City Manager: Rezoning for Fareway
IP7 Letter from William Bleeker to City Manager: Rochester Avenue
IP8 Creating New Childcare Funds through Business Partnerships [Vanderhoef]
IP9 East Central Iowa Council of Governments August 30 Board Meeting Notice
[Vanderhoef]
IP10 Minutes: June 27 East Central Iowa Council of Governments Executive
Committee [Vanderhoef]
IPll Minutes: June 28 East Central Iowa Council of Governments [Vanderhoef]
IP12 Minutes: July 26 East Central Iowa Council of Governments Executive
Committee [Vanderhoet]
IP13 Policy Informer - July 2001 [Vanderhoet]
IP14 Schedule of Outstanding Debt as of June 30, 2001
IPI5 Minutes: August 27, September 5, and September 10 Deer Task Force
IP16 Email from Carol DeProsse to JCNews: Drugs
Agenda packet: September 20, City Council Economic Development Committee
(Previously distributed)
~ City Council Meeting Schedule and s.pt~mber~3.200~
'°~tr~"~ Tentative Work Session Agendas
~ September 24 Monday
6:30p CITY CONFERENCE BOARD Emma J. Harvat Hall
SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION Emma J. Hatvat Hall
J September 25 Tuesday
7:00p SPECIAL FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING Emma J. Hatvat Hall
i October 8 Monday
TBD SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION Emma J. Hatvat Hall
7:00p SPECIAL FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING Emma J. Harvat Hall
! October 16 Wednesday
6:30p - 8:30p SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION Emma J. Hatvat Hall
Smoking in Restaurants
Public Input (6:30p - 7:30p)
· Council Discussion (7:30p - 8:30p)
!October 22 Monday
6:30p SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION Emma J. Hatvat Hall
J October 23 Tuesday
7:00p SPECIAL FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING Emma J. Hailat Hall
J November 12 Monday
6:30p SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION Emma J. Hallat Hall
J November 13 Tuesday
7:00p SPECIAL FORMAL COUNCIL MEETING Emma J. Hatvat Hall
Meeting dates/times subject to change
FUTURE WORK SESSION ITEMS
Dog Park Downtown Historic Preservation Survey
LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENTS WITH SPACE NOT ON THE
GROUND FLOOR AND OCCUPANCY LOADS
ESTABLISHMENT GROUND FLOOR OTHER THAN GROUND FLOOR
Airliner 160 105
Atlas 93 72
Dublin Undergr~>und 0 57
Field House Bar, The 192 208
Fitzpatricks 115 100 (beer garden)
Gabe's 220
Givanni's 111 28 basement
42 - 2"d floor
One-Eyed Jakes 0 230
One-Twenty Six 60 45
Panchero's 30 8
Quinton's Bar & Deli 126 23
Union Bar 775
Note from Jann Ream: These are as close as can be determined at this time. Some of
the occupancies have been determined by the building inspectors and some have been
extrapolated from floor plans on file. We have no floor plans for Gabes, just a listing of
total occupancy. The Union Bal is very complicated and the floor plans may or may not
be accurate.
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 12, 2001 .
TO: City Council
FROM: Dale Helling, Assistant City Manager ~'
RE: Gas/Electric Franchise Renewal
Attached please find "red lined" versions of two franchise ordinances (Gas and Electric).
The indicated revisions are the result of input from both MidAmerican Energy
representatives and City staff. As I indicated to you previously, the staff committee
includes Chuck Schmadeke, Kevin O'Malley, Andy Matthews, Rick Fosse and myself.
I have made it clear to MidAmerican that the suggested revisions put forth by the City
are not to be construed as counter proposals, and that the City cannot commit to any
specific language or even to the extension or renewal of the franchise until this matter
has been discussed by Council. The language you see in the two draft ordinances has
been pursued in the context of what each franchise might look like if renewed using the
current ordinances as a foundation. We have attempted to come up with language which
would afford the City flexibility in the event that future deregulatory measures should
create new oppodunities for local governments to secure power for either government or
citizen use. If Council wishes to address this matter differently, you may certainly choose
to do so.
We have arranged to have Robed Latham of Latham and Associates, Inc. present at
your work session on September 24. Mr. Latham is a consultant with considerable
expertise in the areas of gas and electric utilities, franchising, electric deregulation, and
municipal electrical utilities. Mr. Latham has served the City as a consultant in the past.
He will be able to assist staff in answering your questions regarding the rather complex
issues associated with the question of franchise renewal. Currently, the major issues
would seem to include duration of the franchise, the question of whether or not to
impose a franchise fee, the relative advantages/disadvantages of having a franchise,
future deregulation, and the possibility of a municipal system overbuild.
If you have any specific questions you would like Mr. Latham to address at the work
session, please let me know and I will convey these to him.
cc: City Manager
City Attorney
John Sehnert, MidAmerican Energy
Chuck Schmadeke
Kevin O'Malley
Andy Matthews
Rick Fosse
mg~asst\memos\g&efranchise,doc
Exhibit No. 1
ORDINANCE NO. 8~ 2296
AN ORDiNANCE GRANTiNG TO IOWA ILLiNOIS GAS
AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, MIE!A.MgIRIC~,,ENER, G.y
COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS, THE RIGHT AND FRANCHISE TO ACQUIRE,
CONSTRUCT, ERECT, MAiNTAiN AND OPERATE iN
THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, AN ELECTRIC LIGHT AND
POWER SYSTEM FOR A PERIOD OF FIFTEEN YEARS
AND TO FURNISH AND SELL ELECTRIC ENERGY TO
SAD CITY AND ITS INHABITANTS.
BE IT ENACTED by the City Council of the City of Iowa City:
Section 1. There is hereby granted to Iowa Illinois Gas and electric Company,
an Illinois corporation authorized to do business in the state of Iowa, MidAmerican
EB¢[gY Corn p~!!y~ an lowa c~ora~.ion~ hereinafter called the "Company", and its
successors and assigns, the non-exclusive right and franchise to acquire, construct, erect,
maintain and operate in the city of Iowa City, an electric light and power system
including the right to erect and maintain the necessary poles, lines, wire, transmission
lines, conduits and other appliances for the transmission and distribution of electric
energy along, under and upon the streets, avenues, alleys and public places to serve
customers within and without said City of Iowa City, ~!!d!o furnish and sell electric
cBggy to said gity and::jt~ inhabitantS, for a period of fifteen years from and after the
effective date of this ordinance, provided however that there may be a re-evalU~!jO~rior
tOth~ end oflhg eighth {g.}ygar withtl~gopportuDil~.fO[both pg~ig$!Ore~199st
a~nengtt~.gl~j~s. If ng!~!~gy party rC~ltJg~s such rE-evaluation by~ggs ofa wgi~lgB~p~ige to
the other pgtrty during t!~e last 60 days of franchise year 8, or if the parties arc unable to
agrco to amend the ordinance, th~t!!his fi'anchiSg~,~i!! continu~A!h~ut change
remg!~ing seyen(D years, If either party does request such reevaluation and if the parties
are unable to agree to amend the ordinance, then the franchise shall expire at the end of
the tenth year. and to furnish and sell electric energy to said City and its inhabitants.
Section 2. The rights and privileges granted to the Company as franchisee
under this franchise ordinance, and including the Company's successor and assigns, are
subject to
(1 .) applicable provisions of the Iowa Code, including but not limited to,
Chapter 364 thereof:
(2.) the Code of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, including but not
limited to Chapter 31, Article II, Excavations; Chapter 32,
Subdivision Regulations; Chapter 33, Article IV, Public Utilities
Regulation; Chapter 34, Vegetation; and Chapter 36; Zoning, and
(3 .) any other applicable statue or regulation promulgated by Federal or
State agencies under federal or state laws:
May 7, 2001
all as said laws, codes, ordinances, statutes and regulations are presently enacted. The
Company acknowledges the validity of the aforementioned laws, codes, ordinances,
statutes and regulations as they may exist as of the effective date of this ordinance,
provided however, that the Company reserves the right to challenge or contest the City's
future interpretation or application of any of said laws, codes, ordinances, statues and
regulations. The City may make such lawful and reasonable amendments to the
provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City Iowa City affecting or regulating the
Company in its operation of the electric utility, as the City deems necessary and proper.
The franchise granted herein shall not restrict in any manner the right of the City in the
exercise of any power which it now has or which may hereafter by authorized or
permitted by the laws of the State of Iowa.
Sectlob 3. Nothing iu this agreement shall be constEu~d or interpreted to limil
or prol!ibit th;g City, resid~Bt~or b~!.~h~esses of IowaCity f_C~}n participating in or
gnjP~i~!g ~nY b~Pg!i~.~!~ Proteg~ign-s- of a restructured electric utility industrv to the
extent that such benefits and protections are made availab e to consumers of competitive
electric services under state and federal rules~r~gk!!gtions and law,
Section _t$ The Company shall have the right to erect, construct, or install all
necessary electric utility system components, including but not limited to posts, poles,
towers, conduits, fixtures, manholes, appliances and accessories and to place thereon or
therein the necessary wires for the transmission and distribution of electric energy in and
through said City, but all electric utility system components shall be placed and
maintained so as not to cause unnecessary obstructions of or unnecessary interference
with the construction or operation of any public improvements or facilities located upon
public property or public right-of-way, including but not limited to streets, alleys,
sidewalks, traffic control devices, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, storm drains, or water
mains, which have been or may hereafter be located by authority of the City, or any other
public utilities which are in place. All electric utility system components placed above,
upon, in or under public right-of-way, and the wires placed thereon or therein, shall
comply with the National Electrical Safety Code and the regulations of the utilities
division of the Iowa Deparhnent of Commerce (Utilities Division). Iowa Utilities
Section4_5_. The Company is authorized to make excavations in City streets,
avenues, alleys and public places for purposes of routine repair, replacement, and
maintenance of poles, wires, conduits, lines or other electric utility system components.
In making such excavations, the Company shall obtain a permit therefore pursuant to
Chapter 31 of the Municipal Code, shall not unnecessarily obstruct the use of streets,
avenues, alleys or public places, shall provide the Public Works Director with 24 hours
notice prior to the actual commencement of the work, and shall comply with all
provisions and requirements of Chapter 31 in performing such work. In emergencies
which require immediate excavation, the Company may proceed with the work without
first applying for or obtaining the permit, provided, however, that the Company shall
apply for and obtain the excavation permit as soon as possible after commencing such
emergency work.
The Company is empowered and authorized to cut and trim-prt~ne in careful and
prudent manner, at its expense, any trees extending into any street, alley or public ground
so as to prevent limbs or branches from interfering with the Company' s above-ground
transmission or distribution lines or facilities. The authority or obligation of the
May 7, 2001
Company shall not extend beyond trimming pruningtrees sufficiently to clear its above-
ground lines and facilities. Cutting or h'4m:.~i::g,:pX~Bi!~g shall be performed in residential
street and alley areas in accordance with standards to be established by the City Forester.
The Company shall submit to the City Forester on or before Decemberl, of each year, a
schedule of tree trimming that it intends to do in the residential street and alley areas.
Trimming or cutting which is done on an emergency basis and which is not shown on the
annual trimming and cutting schedule shall be reported to the City Forester within 7
calendar days following such trimming or cutting.
Section 8~. The Company shall defend at its own expense, in the name and on
behalf of the City, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City from any and all
claims, suits, losses, damages, costs or expenses, whether caused or contributed to by the
active or passive negligence of the Company, or by the passive negligence of the City, on
account of injury or damage to any person or property, caused or occasioned, or allegedly
caused or occasioned, in whole or in part, by reason of or arising out of the construction,
reconstruction, excavation, operation or maintenance by the Company of the electric
utilities authorized by this franchise. However, the Company shall not be obligated to
defend, indemnify and save harmless the City for any costs or damages arising from the
negligence of the City, its officers, employees or agents where the Company is not
negligent in any way. In situations where the damage was caused or contributed to by the
active or passive negligence of the Company and the active negligence of the City, the
principles of comparative negligence in effect in Iowa shall apply as between the
Company and the City. The duty of the Company to defend, and save harmless and
indemnify the City shall extend to officers, employees and agents of the City to the extent
the City is obligated to defend, save harmless and indemnify by law.
Section,6~. The Company, and its successors and assigns, is authorized to
extend its lines, wires and conduits, to expand its transmission and distribution systems,
to engage in major repair work and to install new distribution and transmission systems
within the City, provided that such work is done in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Utilities Di,/i~ion,.~p~v~ U~i!i~gs 13p~7~,! and provided further that City
approval of such work is first obtained pursuant to requirements and procedures set forth
in Chapter 33, Article V1 of the Municipal Code, Public Utilities Regulation, now in
effect or as amended.
Section-;z~. The said Company, its successors and assigns, as long as it shall
operate under the terms of this franchise shall furnish electric energy in sufficient
quantities to supply the reasonable demands of said City and the inhabitants thereof in
accordance with the Company' s rules, regulations and conditions of service as approved
by the Utilities Division._l~wa U~i!iti~Boa~:d,
Section~g~. The Company, its successors and assigns, is authorized to impose
reasonable terms and conditions upon the furnishing of electric service and reasonable
rules and regulations in the operation and conduct of its business.
Section OJ:,!). The City shall be privileged upon notice to the Company, without
charge, to make use of the poles, posts, towers and underground conduits of the Company
for any City alarm, City control, or City communication function to the extent that such
use shall not interfere with their use by the Company, but the City shall hold the
Company harmless from any and all causes of action, litigation or damages arising
May 7, 2001
through the placing of the facilities of the City upon the Company's poles, posts or
towers or in the Company' s underground conduits.
Section 40~1_. Upon approval of the City Council and after reasonable attempts to
acquire by purchase, the Company shall have the power to condemn private property for
the purpose of providing electric service to the public and in a reasonable relationship to
an overall plan of distributing electrical energy within the City. The Company must
establish the necessity of each taking of private property and, when so established, the
City Council may approve the condemnation of the private property by resolution.
Section 441~2. The Company shall, at its cost and expense, locate and relocate its
installations in, on, over or under any public street or alley or public grounds in the City
in such manner as the City may at any time reasonably require for the purposes of
facilitating the construction, reconstruction, maintenance or repair of any public
improvement of, in, or about any such street or alley, or public grounds or promoting the
efficient operation of any such improvement. The City may, upon a showing of good and
reasonable cause, require the Company to place or bury its electrical utility system
components underground in any underground service district hereafter established by the
City pursuant to the procedure set forth in Chapter 33, Article V1 of the Municipal code,
Public Utility Regulation.
Section 4z,'2:1~. This franchise shall apply to and bind the City and the Company
and their successors and assigns; provided that any assignment by the Company shall be
subject to the approval of the City Council by resolution, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
The City expressly reserves the right to terminate the franchise granted herein
if the Company breaches any of the provisions of this franchise; provided, however, there
shall be no termination if the Company shall correct the breach within sixty (60) days
written notice provided by the City to do so unless otherwise provided for by ordinance
or a~reement.
The Company shall not be excused from complying with any of the terms and
conditions of this franchise by any failure of the City to insist upon or seek compliance
with any such terms or conditions. Further, it is agreed that the subject matter of this
franchise is unique and may be enforced by specific performance, at the City's option,
since a remedy at law may be inadequate.
Section 4~314. The Company shall, at all times during which this franchise is in
effect, maintain, administer and operate such energy conservation program within the
City, as may be approved by the Utilities Division,!owa Utilit!~Board, which program
shall be designed and operated to promote the conscrvation and efficient use of electrical
energy by all utility customers xvithin the City.
Section 441.5. In the event that the City should at any time during the term of
this franchise become a generator or producer of electrical energy at a municipally-owned
or operated facility or at any other facility in agreement with any co-producers, or should
the City choose to purchase electric power for its facilities form a source other than the
~an¥, .the Company shall, if requested by the City, enter into an agreement to either
purchase or wheel to City facilities the electric energy produced from such qualifying
generating facility, such further agreement being subject to the approval of the Utilities
Divisic:~,~pWa~UtilitieS Board and to applicable statutory requirements and regulations.
Nothing contained in the terms of this franchise shall be construed to prevent the City
May 7, 200l
from purchasing electric power for its facilities from sources other than the Company and
to contract for same from these sources.
Delete Section 15 above and substitute a new Section 15 as follows:
Section 15: In the event the City should at any time during the term of this
franchise become a generator or producer of electrical energy at a municipally-
owned or operated thcility or at any other facility in agreement with any co-
producers or should the City choose to purchase electric power for its facilities from
a source other than the Company, the Company shall, if requested by the City, enter
into an agreement to either parchase at negotiated prices or transmit at regulated
prices and terms, anthorized by the Federal Energy ReRulatoD~ Commission or the
IUB, to City facilities the electric power produced or purchased, where such further
agreement is not disallowed by the IUB or other applicable statutory requirements
and regulations. Nothing contained in the terms of this franchise shall be conslrued
to prevent the City from purchasin~ electric power t~r its facilities from sources
other than the Company and to contract for same frnm these sonrces.
Section 15. This Ordinance and the rights and privileges herein granted arc
subject to the approval of a majority of the el~tora of the City voting at the next general
or municipal elation or at a special election called for that pu~oae. The cost ~d
expense of the election relating to the ~anchiac provided for herein shall be paid by the
Section 16. The Comply, within thiay (30) days after the approval of this
Ordinance by a vote of the p~ple, shall file xvith the office of the City Clerk its
accept~ce in writing of all te~s and provisions of this Ordinance.
Section 17.1~ This Ordinance shall become effective and binding upon it~
approval m~d passage in accordance with Iowa law ~d the written acceptance by the
Company. The Company shall within thirty (30) days a~er the approval of this ordinance
by the City Council, file in the office of the clerk of the City its acceptance in writing of
all the te~s ~d provisions of this ordinance.by the City Council, approval of the voters
as provided in Section 15 hereof; acceptance by the Comply as provided in Section 16
hereof; ~d publication as r~uircd by law. Following Following City Council approval
and written acceptance by tbe Company, this ordinance shall be published as required by
~:in ~h~9~.C~ty Pre~._Ci~i~ _voter approval and acceptance of this Ordinance by
the Company, this Ordinance shall be publish~ in the Iowa City Press Citizen. The
effective date of this Ordinance shall be the date of publication.
Section ~1~. If ~y of the provisions of this ~chise ordinance are for ~y
reason declared to be illegal or void, the lawful provisions of this ~chise ordinance,
which are severable from said unlawful provisions, shall be ~d remain in full force and
effect, the same as if the ~chise ordinance contained no illegal or void provisions. h
the event any provision or provisions are ruled illegal or void by a cou~ of competent
j~isdiction, the City and the Company shall fo~hwith amend this fr~chise to inse~ a
successor provision that complied with the applicable coua ruling.
Section ~1~. All orallances or pa~s of ordin~ces in conflict herewith ~e
hereby repealed.
May 7, 2001
PASSED AND APPROVED this __ day of 2001.
CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
By
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Possible Additional Section
Pole Attachments [
Any person, business or govemment entity other than the City, MidAmerican
Energy Company or its affiliates prior to placing attachments on the aerial utility system
owned or operated by the Company within the City limits of Iowa City, shall receive
prior approval from the City of Iowa City.
May 7, 2001
Exhibit No. 1
ORDNANCE NO. 86 32%z
AN ORDNANCE GRANTING TO IOWA ILLINOIS GAS
AND ELECTRIC COMPANY M!~AMgR!CAN ENERG~
.COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THE RIGHT AND
FRANCHISE TO ACQUIRE,CONSTRUCT. CONSTRUCT, ERECT,
MAINTAiN AND OPERATE IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, A GAS
PLANT OR PLANTSFOR A PERIOD OF FIFTEEN YEARS AND TO
FURNISH AND SELL GAS FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE USE IN
THE CITY OF IOWA CITY AND ELSEWHERE.
BE IT ENACTED by the City Council of the City of Iowa City:
Section 1. There is hereby granted to loxva Illinois Gas and clcctric Company,
an Illinois corporation authorized to do business iu the state of lowa,~idAmerican
Energy Company, an Iowa corporation, hereinafter called the "Company", and its
successors and assigns, the non-exclusive right and franchise to acquire, construct, erect,
maintain and operate in the City of Iowa City, a gas plant or plants for the production,
storage, transmission, distribution, sale, delivery or furnishing of gas, either natural or
manufactured or mixed natural and manufactured, including the right to use the streets,
avenues, alleys and public grounds and bridges in the City of Iowa City for the purpose
of laying, constructing, maintaining, replacing and substituting mains, pipes, conduits and
other facilities for the transmission, distribution, sale, delivery or furnishing of gas for
public and private use to furnish and sell such gas to said City and its inhabitants in the
City of Iowa City and elsewhere for a period of fifteen years from and after the effective
date of this ordinance, provid~!~owever thgt ther¢ may be ~rgz.e~aluafion
g~ ofthg gig~th (8) yCg~y~th the oppg~unity for bo~!~.parties to rcqU~.k~¢ndments, If
neither party requests such re-evaluation by mem!s of a written notice to the other party
dgri!~g t!~.!ast 60 dgy~.~f franchi~g year 8, or if the parties are unable to agree to amend
the ordinance, tl3~p.~!Tfis ti'anqhi~gsill cont!BU~yi~hout ~b.~g~for the tLe~3.a.i.~!~g ~even
(7) years. If either party does request such reevaluation and if the parties are unable to
agree to amend the ordinance, then the franchise shall expire at the end of the tenth year.
and to furnish and sclI such gas to said City and its inhabitants.
Section 2. The rights and privileges granted to the Company, as franchisee
under this franchise ordinance, and including the Company's successor and assigns, are
subject to:
(1 .) applicable provisions of the Iowa Code, including but not limited to,
Chapter 364 thereof:
(2.) the Code of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City, including but not
limited to Chapter 31, Article II, Excavations; Chapter 32,
Subdivision Regulations; Chapter 33, Article IV, Public Utilities
Regulation; Chapter 34, Vegetation; and Chapter 36; Zoning, and
(3 .) any other applicable statue or regulation promulgated by Federal or
State agencies under federal or state laws:
May 7, 2001
all as said laws, codes, ordinances, statutes and regulations are presently enacted. The
Company acknowledges the validity of the aforementioned laws, codes, ordinances,
statutes and regulations as they may exist of the effective date of this ordinance, provided
however, that the Company reserves the right to challenge or contest the City' s future
interpretation or application of any of said laws, codes, ordinances, statutes and
regulations. The City may make such lawful and reasonable amendments to the
provisions of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City affecting or regulating the
Company in its operation of the gas utility, as the City deems necessary and proper. The
franchise granted herein shall not restrict in any manner the fight of the City in the
exercise of any power it now has or which may hereafter be authorized or permitted by
the laws of the State of Iowa.
Section 3. The Company shall have the right to excavate in any public street for
the purpose of laying, relaying, repairing or extending gas pipes, mains, conduits and
other facilities, but all gas utility system components shall be placed and maintained so as
not to cause unnecessary obstruction of or unnecessary interference with the construction
or operation of any public improvements or facilities located upon public property or
public fight-of-way, including but not limited to streets, alleys, sidewalks, traffic control
devices, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, storm drains, or water mains, which have been or
may hereafter be located by authority of the City, or any other public utilities which are
in place. All gas utility service,~y~m components placed above, upon, in or under
public right-of-way shall comply with the rules an_~:~National Fuel Gas Code and the
regulations of the :lo~Utiliti~$Board, Utilities Division of the Iowa Department of
Commerce (Utilities Division) regarding construction and clearance requirements.
Section 4. In making excavations in any streets, avenues, alleys and public places
for the installation of gas pipes, conduits, or apparatus, the Company shall obtain a permit
therefore pursuant to Chapter 32 of the Municipal Code, shall not unnecessarily obstruct
the use of streets, avenues, alleys or public places, shall provide the Public Works
Director with 24 hours notice prior to the actual commencement of the work, and shall
complywith allprovisions and requirements ofChapter31 in performing suchwork. In
emergencies which require immediate excavation, the Company may proceed with the
work without first applying for or obtaining the permit, provided, however, that the
Company shall apply for and obtain the excavation permit as soon as possible after
commencing such emergency work.
Section 5. The Company shall defend at its own expense, in the name and on
behalf of the City, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City from any and all
claims, suits, losses, damages, costs or expenses, whether caused or contributed to by the
active or passive negligence of the Company, or by the passive negligence of the City, on
account of injury or damage to any person or property, caused or occasioned, or allegedly
caused or occasioned, in whole or in part, by reason of or arising out of the construction,
reconstruction, excavation, operation or maintenance by the Company of the gas utilities
authorized by this franchise. However, the Company shall not be obligated to defend,
indemnify and save harmless the City for any costs or damages arising from the
negligence of the City, its officers, employees or agents where the Company is not
negligent in any way. In situations where the damage was caused or contributed by the
active or passive negligence of the Company and the active negligence of the City, the
principles of comparative negligence in effect in Iowa shall apply as between the
May 7, 2001
Company and the City. The duty of the Company to defend, and save harmless and
indemnify the City shall extend to officers, employees and agents of the City to the extent
the City is obligated to defend, save harmless and indemnify by law.
Section 6. The Company, and its successors and assigns, is authorized to
extend its mains, pipes and appurtenances, to expand its transmission and distribution
systems, to engage in major repair work and to install new distribution and transmission
systems within the City, provided that such work is done in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the low~Utilitie~.~ardUtilitic5 Division, and provided further that City
approval of such work is first obtained pursuant to requirements and procedures set forth
in Chapter 33, Article VI of the Municipal Code, Public Utilities Regulation, now in
effect or as mended.
Section 7. The said Company, its successors and assigns, as long as it shall
operate under the terms of this franchise shall furnish gas in sufficient quantities to
supply the reasonable demands of said City and the inhabitants thereof in accordance
with the Company's rules, regulations and conditions of service as approved by the Iowa
Utilities Board. Utilitics Division.
Section 8. The Company, its successors and assigns, is authorized to impose
masonable terms and conditions upon the fumishing of gas service and reasonable rules
and regulations in the operation and conduct of its business.
Section 9. Upon approval of the City Council and after reasonable attempts to
acquire by purchase, the Company shall have the power to condemn private property for
the purpose of providing gas service to the public and in a reasonable relationship to an
overall plan of distributing gas energy within the City. The Company must establish the
necessity of each taking of private property and, when so established, the City Council
may approve the condemnation of the private property by resolution.
Section 10. The Company shall, at its cost and expense, locate and relocate its
installations in, on, over or under any public street or alley or public .grounds in the City
in such manner as the City may at any time reasonably require for the purposed of
facilitating the construction, reconstruction, maintenance or repair of the street or any
public improvement of, in, or about any such street or alley or public grounds, or
promoting the efficient operation of any such improvement.
Section 11. This franchise shall apply to and bind the City and the Company
and their successors and assigns; provided that any assignment by the Company shall be
subject to the approval of the City Council by resolution, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
The City expressly reserves the right to terminate the franchise granted herein
if the Company breaches any of the provisions of this franchise; provided, however, them
shall be no termination if the Company shall correct the breach within sixty (60) days
written notice provided by the City to do so unless othersvise provided for by ordinance
or agreement.
The Company shall not be excused from complying with any of the terms and
conditions of this franchise by any failure of the City to insist upon or seek compliance
with any such terms or conditions. Further, it is agreed that the subject matter of this
franchise is unique and may be enforced by specific performance, at the City's option,
since a remedy at law may be inadequate.
May.7,_200!
Section 12. The Company shall, at all times during which this franchise is in
effect, maintain, administer and operate such energy conservation program within the
City, as may be approved by the Iowa Utilities BoardUtilities Division, which pro/,n'am
shall be dcsigned and operated to promote the conservation and efficient use of gas
cncrgy by all utility customcrs within the City.
Section 13. This Ordinance and the rights and privileges herein granted arc
subject to the approval of a majority of the electors of the City, voting at the next general
or municipal election or at a special election callod for that purpose. The cost and
expense oFthe election relating to thc franchise provided for herein shall be paid by the
Ca:hi:any.
Section l q. The Company, within 30 days after the approval of this Ordinance
by a vote of the people, shall file with the office of the City Clerk its acceptance in
writing of all terms and provisions of this Ordinance.
Section J;a4-5. This Ordinance shall become effective ~nd b n~ing upon:,it_}
passage and .~lpproval_in accords_nee with Iowa la~v and the written acceptance by the
Company.. .The Comp~ly sha!>vithin l3irly (30) days after l~.approva!o~.t!~is ordiu~n.cc
!eY.j~be Ci,t~C0.unci!,.fi!c in tll~.gf~cc 0[.~l~ clerk 9f.~he City !!~.~cceptan~9 in writing of
all the terms and provisions of this ordinance.by the City Conncil, approval of the voters
as provided in Section 13 hereof; acceptance by the Company as provided in Section 14
hereof; and publication as required by law. Following Gi~Y CP.~[~e!! app[gy~! ~n~! }¥[ill~n
~cceptance by the Company, this ordinance shall be published as required by law in t~c
Iowa City Press Citizen.voter approval and acceptance of this Ordinance by the
Company, this Ordinance shall be published in the Iowa City Press Citizen. The
effective date of this Ordinance shall be the date of publication.
Section ~44i. If any of the provisions of this franchise ordinance are for any
reason declared to be illegal or void, then the lawful provisions of this franchise
ordinance, which are severable from said unlawful provisions, shall be and remain in full
force and effect, the same as if the franchise ordinance contained no illegal or void
provisions. In the event any provision or provisions are ruled illegal or void by a court of
competent jurisdiction, the City and the Company shall forthwith amend this franchise to
insert a successor provision that complied with the applicable court ruling.
Section 1.~44. All ordinances orparts ofOrdinances incon~ict herewith are
hereby repealed.
PASSED AND APPROVED this __ day of 2001.
CITY OFIOWA CITY, IOWA
By
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
May 7, 2001
31 August2001
Mr. Drew Shaffer
Cable TV Administrator
City of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240-1826
Dear Drew:
In our continuing effort to keep you informed, Mediacom is providing the City notice of a
price adjustment for customers who subscribe only to the @Home service.
Effective October 1,2001, the ala carte monthly rate for the @Home service will increase
by $10 per month to $55.95. Customers subscribing to both video services, such as basic
and expanded basic, and @Home will be discounted $10 on their monthly bill and will
continue to pay only $45.95 per month for their @Home service, in addition to their
monthly charge for video services.
Current ala carte @Home customers will receive a $5 monthly discount on the new ala
carte pricing through March 31,2002.
Mediacom is committed to providing the best products at the highest levels of service and
reliability. This price adjustment will enable us to continue investing in state-of-the art
technology as we strive to deliver the fastest Intemet connection in Iowa.
Legal notice of this price change will be provided in local newspapers and ala carte
@Home customers wiI1 receive separate written notice from Mediacom.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (319) 395-9699,
extension 210.
Sincerely,
Regional Vice President
Mediacorn Communications Corporation
6300 Council St. NE · Cedar Rapids, 1A 52402 ° 319-395-7801
Fax 319-393-7017
Iowa City Babe Ruth League
PO. Box 731 Iowa City, Iowa 52244-0731
September 4, 2001
Iowa City Parks and Recreation Dept.
220 S. Gilbert St.
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
ATTN: Terry Trueblood, Director
Gentlemen,
We, the Iowa City Babe Ruth Board of Directors, would at this
time like to extend a hearty thank you to yourselves, and the
City of Iowa City, for the fine new building now being utilized
at Mercer Park by our program.
This new structure will allow us to grow and put it to use for
the betterment of the youth baseball in Iowa City.
Enclosed you will find a check in the amount of $7500.00.
Hopefully, each year we will make a contribution in saying
thank you and a show of appreciation.
Once again, our hats are off to everyone involved in making
this dream building become a reality.
Thank you.
President,
Iowa City Babe Ruth League
Steve Atkins ~
From: Shawtamike@cs.com
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:59 AM
To: stephen atkins@iowa-city.org
Subject: Rezonin~ for Fareway
Dear Mr. Atkins,
As a resident in the neighborhood directly effected by this issue I urge you
NOT to rezone. I do agree that East Iowa City needs more retailers. I do
not agree that rezoning this land is necessary. Look around our area. We
have had a problem keeping retailers. That is evident by all of the vacant
buildings on the East side. Please urge businesses to fill up the vacant
buildings before building more. We do not need more buildings.
There is also a safety factor. I drive Highway 6 and Scott Blvd. regularly.
The semi drivers from the industries are not good about sharing the road.
They have a philosophy that if they can get the cab of their truck in front
of you they have time to go. Mixing this traffic with thousands of people
running errands will result in increased accidents.
I also would hate to see industries run out. We need them to survive also.
I am afraid if this area is rezoned not only will it be difficult to get new
industries in the area, but the ones we have may leave. Then how will those
workers afford to shop?
Tami Shaw
shawtamike@cs.com
2315 Rochester Avenue
iowa City, 522~
September 7, 2001
Dear Steve Arkins,
'RED' to underscore appreciation of the fine work on Rochester Avenue
in recent weeks -- the 'smooth' surface is great on that heavily utilized
roadway.
Also, for the expedited surface patching in scores of locations aroused
the city in recent months - after the tough winter. Particularly reme~n-
bered was the quick response o~ the street surface adjacent to the Jefi'erson/
Glendale bridge a couple months ago.
Have a nice fall, Sir.
Sincerely,
Willimn Bleeker
Distributed by Council Member Pfab
Creating new Childcare Funds through Business Partnerships
When does this begin?
Any time a business approaches the County Board of Supervisors or City
Officials and asks for a tax abatement, bonds or any other financial support to build or
expand their business in our community.
How is this partnership created?
a) The County or City o~cials respond they are interested in considering
the request for assistance to the business only after they submit a plan
that demonstrates how that business will contribute to their
employee' s childcare thus being able to receive up to $150,000 per
year Federal Tax Credit.
b) The business submits a plan that shows they will do any one of the
following activities that meet the Federal tax code for a childcare
business tax credit.
1. They will contribute funds annually to help build new childcare
facilities or improve existing facilities either on site or in the
community.
2. They will contribute funds to provide training to workers in the
childcare field.
3.They will hire a nurse to do site visits and consult with
employees childcare providers both home and center based.
4.They will subsidize a portion of the monthly childcare fees for
their employees.
Why should you, as Government Officials encourage use of the Federal
Tax Credit for local businesses?
a) Many employers and corporations are not aware of this new
Federal tax credit (passed in May of 2001) and your request would
result in a benefit for their company.
b) Quality Affordable Childcare attracts workers to a community.
c) Childcare needs the supports from local business in order to attract
qualified and trained personnel.
d) Quality childcare maximizes the opportunities to help a child
develop and achieve school readiness skills.
e) Children are our future and the village it takes to raise them
includes you!
Distributed by
Counci 1 member Vanderhoef
09-13-01
East Central Iowa Council of Oovernments'~oard Meeting Notice IP9
Kirkwood alyt/il~liI~.(dii~"llC~'hh' SetVii:es
....... ............................... .....................
TEL 365-9941 FAX 365-9981
pages
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
· 1 Recognition of Alternates
.2 Public Discussion
.3 Approval of Agenda
2.0 ROUTINE MATTERS '.
1-14 .1 Approval of Minutes
· June 27, 2001 Executive Committee Minutes
· June 28, 2001 Board Meeting Minutes
· July 26, 2001 Executive Committee Minutes
15-17 .2 Preceding Month's Budget Reports/Balance Sheets
3.0 AGENCY REPORTS
.1 Chairperson's Report
.2 Board Members' Reports
.3 Director's Report
18-19 .4 Joint-Purchasing Report
20-22 .5 Community Development Report
23-25 .6 Housing Report
26-32 .7 Solid Waste Report
· Travel requests
33-37 .8 Transportation Report
· Extension of Transit Service Contracts
4.0 COMMITTEE REPORTS
· 1 Executive Committee
.2 Personnel Committee
.3 Budget Committee
38-40 .4 Transit Operators Group
41-42 .5 Solid Waste Technical Advisory Committee
.6 Ad Hoc Committee Reports
43-44 5.0 IOWA INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW SYSTEM
6.0 OLD BUSINESS
.1 Approval of Expenditures
7.0 NEW BUSINESS
8.0 NEXT MEETING: September 27, 2001
ECICOG is the Region lO planning agency serving local governments in the counties of Benton, Iowa, Johnson, Jones, Linn,
and Washington.
Distributed by
Counci 1 member
MINUTES Vanderhoef
East Central Iowa Council of Governments
Executive Committee Meeting Conference Call I 09-i3-01
1:00 p .m., June 27, 2001 - ECICOG office I P
108 Third Street SE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson, Dee Vanderhoef at 1:07 p.m.
.1 Roll Call
MEMBERS PRESENT
Dee FanderhoeJ:lowa City City COuncil O~resent in ECICOG office)
Dennis Hansen-Jones County Citizen
Lu Barron-Linn County Supervisor
Ed Brown-Mayor of Washington
MEMBERS ABSENT
Henry Herwig-Coralville City Council
STAFF PRESENT
Doug Elliott-Executive Director
Gina Peters-Administrative Assistant
Mary Rump-IT/Transportation Planner
Robyn Jacobsen-Planner
2.0 ROUTINE MATTERS
.1 Approval of Agenda
M/S/C (Hartsen/Brown) to approve the agenda. All ayes.
: 3.0 NEW BUSINESS
,- .1 Review Service Contract Language
.2 Review Distribution Options
Elliott told the committee that he brought to the attention of the Chair, Dee Vanderhoef, a
disparity in the distribution of State Transit Assistance funds. One of the transit proriders would
be receiving more than their estimated assistance for the year and the remaining providers would
be receiving less than was projected. Vanderhoef suggested that the executive committee meet to
discuss the issue. The last STA payment for the quarter was received on Monday and is included
in the totals. If the executive committee approves the re-distribution of funds, the changes would
be made and presented to the full board at their regular meeting tomorrow.
Vanderhoef referred to the sample contxaet that was included in the packet, She noted that the
contract doesn't have a specific distribution formula. Hansen and Barton stated they had no
problems with changing the formula in fairness to the other providers. Vanderhoef reviewed
page 5 of the packet noting the difference in the total operating and the amounts that were
projected by ECICOG. Discussion followed on the difference in the projections.
Rump referred to a FY 2001 Region 10 Transit Operating Assistance - Prorider Funding Options
spreadsheet dated June 27, 2001. This spreadsheet was faxed earlier to members of the
conference call. Rump gave an overview of the spreadsheet and outlined the three options for
distributing funds. Option A would leave the formula as it has been in the past and would give
all but one provider a deficit. Option B would distribute 4m quarter funding to only five
providers to ensure that the projections that were made in the beginning of the year were met.
The remaining funds would be distributed to all providers. Option C would distribute 4th quarter
funding to five proriders to ensure that the projections that were made in the beginning of the
year were met. The remaining ~mds would be deposited in the. .regional transit account.
Discussion followed on the options presented. Elliott told the board that if the remaining funds
were to be put into the transit account a possible use for the funds would be for ne~y bus signage
that will be require_d next year. Brown asked who is responsible for paying for the signage.
Rump stated that in the past it has been the responsibility of the proriders. Jacobson stated that
the Transit Operator's Group is aware of the new signage requirements and has voted to use the
funds in the regional transit account to help cover the costs. Elliott asked committee members
what options they were comfortable with. Hansen and Barton noted they were in favor of Option
C. Brown asked what the balance was in the regional transit account. Elliott stated that the
balance is around $34,684. Jacobson stated that approximately $2,000 of those funds was to be
used' for yellow page advertisement. Brown said that he liked Option A but would be agreeable
to Option B. Hamen then decided he would be in favor of Option B. Vanderhoef asked what the
cost of signage would be. Rump stated that the approximate cost per vehicle is $300-$400.
There are 70 vehicles in the fleet. Jacobson also noted that federal and state funding may
decrease next year and a possible use of the remaining funds could be to cover those provider
deficits. More discussion followed. After discussion, the committee consensus was to
recommend Option B to the full board. Vanderhoefnoted that the options and a recommendation
of Option B would be presented to the full board for approval. -
The meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m. : ../ /
Lu Barron, Secretary/Treasurer
August 30, 2001
Date
FY 2001 Region 10 Transit riperating Assistance - Provider Funding Options
Prepared June 27, 2001
:
System Projected Operating Option A Option A Option B Option B Option C Option C
Assistance vs. Projected vs. Projected vs. Projected
Benton $79,817 $67,751 -$12,066 $80,429 $612 $79,817 $0
Iowa $70,179 $66,701 -$3,478 $70,782 $603 $70,179 $0
Johnson $59,213 $50,273 -$8,940 $59,667 ~ $454 $59,213 $0
Jones $78,4.t2 $81,153 $2,721 $79,165 $733 $78,432 $0
LInn $116,003 $107,277 -$8,726 $116,973 $970 $116,003 $0
Wash!ngton $173,485 $244,447 $70,962 $210,586 $37,101 $208,377 $34,892
ECICOG $60,000 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,000 $0
Regional
Transit AccL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,581 $5,581
Total $637,129 $677,602 $40,473 $677,602 $40,473 $677,602 $40,473
Option A - Typical DIstribution (based on formula of 60% revenue miles end 40% rides)
Option B-~:~'th q,uarter funding to only five proriders to ensure at least 100% of projected revenue to all proriders. Remainder distributed to all six provlders.
Option C - 4th quarter funding to only five providers to ensure at least 100% of projected revenue to all proriders. Remainder distributed to the regional transit account
MINUTES
East Central Iowa Council of Governments Di stri buted by Counci 1 member
Vanderhoef
Board Meeting l:00p.m.
June 28, 2001 - ECICOG office t 09-13-01
108 Third Street SE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa IFI11
MEMBERS PRESENT
Dee lzanderhoef-lowa City City Council ..
/inn Hearn-lSinn County Citizen
ISu Barron-lSinn County Supervisor
Larry Wilson-Johnson County Citizen
Ed Brown-Mayor of D ashington
David Fermedahl-Benton County Supervisor
James Houser-Linn County Supervisor
Leo Cook-Jones County Supervisor
Dennis Haasen-Jones County Citizen
David Cavey-Mayor of Olin
Don Magdefrau-Benton County Citizen
Gary Edwards-Iowa County Citizen
Mike Lehman-Johnson County Supervisor
Ed Raber- Washington County Citizen
Charlie Montross-Iowa County Supervisor
MEMBERS ABSENT
Tom Tjelmeland-Mayor of Ely
Rod Straub-Iowa County Supervisor
Dale Todd-Cedar Rapids Commissioner
Marc Greenlee-Benton County Citizen
Bob Stout-Washington County Supervisor
Henry Herwig-Coralville City Council
ALTERNATES PRESENT - None
OTltER'S PRESENT
Mary Zielinski-Kalona News
Douglas Morgan-City of Kalona
STAFF PRESENT
Doug Elliott-Executive Director
Gina Peters-Administrative Assistant
Robyn Jacobson-Transit Administrator
Mary Rump-IT/TransportationPlanner
Jim Nehring-Joint-Purchasing Coordinator
Lisa Garlich - Planner
Marie De Vries - Solid Waste Planning Coordinator
David Correia-Planner
Tracey Mulcahey-Grants Administrator
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson, Dee Vanderhoef at 1:02 p .m.
.1 Recognition of Alternates
Vanderhoef introduced new board member Larry Wilson as the Johnson County Citizen Representative.
.2 Public Discussion - None
.3 Approval of Agenda
MJS/C (Brown/Houser) to approve the agenda. All ayes.
2.0 ROUTINE MATTERS
.1 Approval of Minutes (May 31, 2001)
M/S/C (Hansen/Raber) to approve the minutes as written. All ayes.
.2 Preceding Month's Budget Reports/Balance Sheets
Elliott gave an overview of the May financial statements.
Rump and Jacobson joined the meeting at this time.
M/S/C (Cook/Montross) to receive and file the May financial statements for audit. All ayes.
3.0 AGENCY REPORTS
.1 Chairperson's Report
Vanderhoef told board members she wouldn't be available for the executive committee meeting in July.
.2 Board Members' Reports
Brown mentioned that he recently toured D&D Ranch in Swisher. Vermedahl told board members that
the WMT Tractoreade went through Vinton yesterday.
.3 Director's Report
Elliott gave an update on the circuit rider pilot project with USDA and if)El). He noted that there were
seven eligible communities in the region and Oxford Junction and Onslow opted not to participate in the
program. After the first of the fiscal year, the position will be able to be filled. Discussion followed.
.4 Joint-Purchasing Report
Nehring gave an overview of the first year of joint-purchasing at ECICOG.(handouO Discussion
followed. Elliott referred to the last page of the report, the listing of options for the continuation of the
joint-purchasing task force. He told board members that if they would like to discuss option 3 or 4 they
should contact him or Nehring. Ellintt noted that in April 2002, the grant ~mding from IDED will stop.
Cook asked what the cost would be to continue the program. Elljolt said the grant from IDED was
$38,000 for 24 months and participating entities contributed $11,000. Ellintt said that if the board was
interested in continuing the program that an agenda item could be added for the next meeting.
Discussion followed. Lehman asked Nehring to prepare a history of the joint-purchasing efforts and the
cost savings per item to be presented at the next board meeting.
.5 Community Development Report
Information was included in the board packet.
.6 Housing Report
,- Information was included in the board packet.
.7 Solid Waste Report
DeVries gave an overview of the GRO house in Belle Plaine and a general listing of the items needing
rehabilitation.
DeVries told the board that the IDN'R sent ECICOG a contract for $100,000 to evaluate recycling
programs in selected communities in the region. Edwards asked how much of the grant was for
administration. DeVries stated that $20,000 was budgeted for administration. A consultant will be hired
for the project and possibly an intern. Brown asked if Wash'mgton County was included in this contract.
DeVries stated that only the cities of Riverside and Kalona in Washington County are in the ECICOG
solid waste planning region.
M/S/C (Edwards/Cavey) to authorize Elljolt to sign the contract with the IDN'R for the recycling
evaluation project. All ayes.
DeVries presented the FY01 waste tire budget and showed board members a display of past tire
recycling education and promotional materials that have been used.
.8 Transportation Report
Rump indicated that the IDOT has released the draft 2002-2004 State Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP) and will meet in late August to discuss its approval for submittal to the Federal Highway
Administration. Rump noted that the STIP includes projects that were programmed by Regional
Planning Affiliates (RPAs), Metropolitan Planning Organizations 0VlPOs), and state projects. A copy is
available for review.
5
Jacobson referred to page 17 of the board packet, a sample purchase of service contract. This contract
will extend the current conlracts with each of the providers 60 days until the end of August when the
transit subcommittee will present their final recommendations to the board.
M/S/C (Montross/Raber) to allow the chair to sign the 60 day purchase of service contracts with each of
the transit proriders. All ayes. .
4.0 COMMITTEE REPORTS
.1 Executive Committee
Vanderhoef told the'board that the executive committee met yesterday via conference call. It was brought
to her attention that there was a disparity in the distribution of state transit assistance and she felt the
committee should meet to discuss the issue. A handout of the FY2001 Region 10 Transit Operating
Assistance - Provider Funding Options was passed around. ('attached) She noted that if the present
funding formula is continued, four of the six counties would experiunee a deficit in funding, one would
be slightly over projections and the other would be considerably over projections. She also noted that the
contracts do not state the distribution formula that is to be used. Jacobson gave a summary of the handout
and explained the options presented. She also told the board that in the near future, the regional vehicles
will be required to have new signage making the system identification prominent. (handouO She is sitting
on a state-wide committee to discuss signage on vehicles.
Discussion followed on the options.
M/S CRaber/Brown) to table discussion until aRer the transit sub-committee presents their
recommendations at item 4.6.
Vanderhoef stated that she, as well as the executive committee members, felt it was important to start the
new fiscal year with the recommendations from the transit sub-committee. The executive committee also
felt the board had the power to make the change. The executive committee recommends that the board
approve Option B. More discussion followed.
Brown, Raber, Lehman, and Edwards ayes, all the rest nays. Motion failed.
M/S/C (Cook/Montross) to change the funding formula distribution for 4s' quarter STA. All ayes.
M/S/C 011arron/Heam) to use Option C for the distribution of 4a~ quarter STA. Brown, Raber nay, all the
rest ayes.
.2 Personnel Committee - None
.3 Budget Committee - None
.4 Transit Operator's Group
,. .5 Solid Waste Technical Advisory Committee
.6 Ad Hoc Committee Reports
A copy of the slide presentation made by the transit sub-committee at last month's board meeting was
handed out.
Vanderhoef stated that to date, no written comments have been received on the recommendations. She
also asked that the board vote on each recommendation separately.
M/S/C (Houser/Raber) to maintain current brokered structure, with greater oversight and decision-
making by the ECICOG Board of Directors. All ayes.
M/S/C (RaberfMont~oss) to specify minimum service requirements and contraet accordingly. All ayes.
M/S/C (Cook/Houser) to recognize that medical and employment services may need to be accessed
outside of home county, a common process for accommodating exceptions should be established. All
ayes.
M/S/C (CooldHansan) the funding formula should be changed to mirror the IDOT distribution formula.
All ayes.
MJS/C (Cook/Houser) to discontinue subcontracting of transit operations and/or subleasing of capital by
providers. All ayes.
6
M/S (Raber/Brown) to adopt all of the sub-committee recommendations with the exception of changing
the funding formula to be changed for FY03.
Discussion followed on waiting a year to change the funding formula. Raber stated he didn't think it was
fair to give the provideis only two month's notice to prepare their budgets for the coming year.
(Hearn left the meeting at this time)
Motion failed: Brown, Edwards, Raber ayes all the rest nays.
M/S/C (HouserfMontross) to adopt all of the recommendations of the sub-committes including the
funding formula as-of September 1, 2001. Raber nay, all the rest ayes.
5.0 IOWA I1NI'ERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW SYSTEM
IA200110-039, Foundation 2 - Youth Shelter, Family Counseling and SWeet Outreach.
M/S/C (Hartsen/Brown) to approve the latergovernmental Review with a favorable review. Bancon
abstained, all the rest ayes.
6.0 OLD BUSINESS
.1 Approval of Expenditures
M/S/C (Hansen/Cavey) to approve payment of expenditures including payments for STA from Item 4.1.
All ayes.
7.0 NEW BUSINESS - None
8.0 NEXT MEETING: AUgust 30, 2001
The ECICOG board has been invited to meet at the new Kirkwood training center in Marion and will
meet there in August.
M/S/C (Cook/Raber) to allow the executive committee to meet in July in lieu of the full board. All ayes.
The meeting adjourned at 2:47 p.m.
Lu Barron, Secretary/Treasurer
Au~mst 30, 2001
Date
Distributed by
MINUTES Counci 1 member Vanderhoef
East Central Iowa Council of Govemments ] 09-13-01
Executive Committee Meeting Conference Call I P
1:00 p.m., July 26, 2001 - ECICOG office
108 Third Street SE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
MEMBERS PRESENT
Dennis Hansen-Jone~ County Citizen
Henry Herwig-Coralville City Council
Ed Brown-Mayor of Washington
Ed Raber-Washington County Citizen
MEMBERS ABSENT
Dee Vanderhoej~lowa City City Council
Lu Barron-Linn County Supervisor
STAFF PRESENT
Doug Elliott-Executive Director
Gina Peters-.4dministrative Assistant
Mary Rump-IT/Transportation Planner
Robyn Jacobsen-Planner
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Vice-Chairperson, Ed Brown at 1:00 p.m.
.1 Public Discussion - None
.2 Approval of Agenda
M/S/C (Hanscn/Hetwig) to approve the agenda. All ayes.
Raberjoined the meeting at this time.
2.0 ROUTINE MA~FFERS
,- .1 Preceding Month's Budget Reports/Balance Sheets
Elliott gave an overview of the June financial statements.
M/S/C (Herwig/Hansen) to receive and file the June financial statements for audit. All ayes.
3.0 AGENCY REPORTS
.1 Chairperson's Report - None
.2 Committee Members' Reports - None
.3 Director's Report
A sample purchase of service contract was mailed to committee members with the changes that
were made in red type.
Brown suggested that under item B .2. Demand Responsive, the no fixed stops or times that is in
parenthesis be defined more clearly in a glossary section of the contract. Elljolt noted that the
changes that were made to the contracts are a result of the transportation sub-committee
recommendations that were approved at the June board meeting. Hansen noted that he liked the
additions to the contract because they help explain what is required. He also thought a glossary
page should be added to the contract. Brown referred topage 5 of the contract and suggested
that the red section be deleted from section G. Hansen agreed. Brown also suggested to take
out section G.5. Discussion followed. It was decided to forward this sample contract to the full
board for discussion at the August board meeting. Raber noted that in Section G.1. the exact
distribution formula should be stated more clearly. Elliott noted that the current provider
contacts expire on September 1, 2001 and the next board meeting is August 30, 2001 so a 30-
day contract extension will be necessary.
The committee would like staff to prepare a glossary section ~f the contract that includes a
mathematical representation of the distribution formula. The contract with the glOSsary section
is to be presented to the full board in August.
4.0 IOWA INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW SYSTEM
M/S/C (Hansen/Herwig) to approve all intergovemmental reviews with a favorable review. All
ayes.
5.0 OLD BUSINESS
.1 Approval of Expenditures
M/S/C (Herwig/Hansen) to approve payment of expenditures. All ayes.
6.0 NEW BUSINESS - None
7.0 NEXT MEETING: August 30, 2001
The meeting adjourned at 1:24 p.m.
Lu Barton, Secretary/Treasurer
August 30, 2001
Date
Distributed by
Council member Vanderhoef
! I
July 2001
Nalional League of CitiesNational Municipal Policy
NLC's seven Steering Committees have completed their International Agreements: The Committee discussed how
spring meetings in wkich members explored, identified NLC can promote balance bem'een cncnuraging trade and
and discussed issues related to the policy development protecting local authority. Georgetown Llniversity l.aw
priorities of each committee. At their fall meetings, the Professor Robert Stumberg educated the Committee about
committees will deliberate and vote on proposals developed potentially adverse lan~age in trade and mvestn3cnt
based on the spring work reported in this issue of the Po/i7 agreements that could impact local savereighty regarding
[qfomzer. subsidies, procurement, seaices, and re~lato0,power. The
Areas iden6~ed that may require cross-committee discussion Committee is drafting pokey language to protect local
to ensure policy consistency include border inspections, government interests during current and future negotiatinns,
digital divides, land use, school based 'clinics and youth particularly regarding the WTO General Agreement nn Trade
suicide, spectrum and transit nricnted development. & Seaice (GATS) and the Free Trade Area ,ff the Americas
(b~AA).
Other Suggestions? in addifon to work on pri~,ri%' issues,
~l~e comminecs will consider propnsals m the tall that ate Transit-Oriented Developn~ent: Conm~ittcc Mcmhcr Tcri
,uhmitted during the summer by direct member cmcs, Jackson, Councilmember, Grand Prairie, TX, w:ts appointed
mdividuM city elected officials, aud state muuic~pal leagues. to NI.C's "TEA-2I Task Force" to guide NI.C p~fiicy {,u the
X mailing soliciting proposals will go out this sunnner with a reauthorization of the "Transportation l.;quit> Act t~i the 21
duc date ot August 10'h. Century" CI'IEA 21). Members gave guidance t,~ ehc~r Task
Force member about how d~c federal g~x'crnmcnt ma> help
Wh~;i'~'~j~':Ca~ilttCe~*Debatc The Proposals? local governments with Transit ( ~rientcd l)c~ch qm~cnt
'.,,:':':~?~'~Li:-:~:'~g'c-.i.:.':~:~.... i'5'..... ':' ,; ' .
200'1 'Afl~B'[~g~fi~is '8f:Gi~s '6n Wednesday, December ,,f funding sources for more crcaton of af~.rdahlc h, ,using
:,,2O01~i~:?g~6~'inghi~s: · including expansion ,,f the H()MI"; h~vcstmcnt ]~r,,~Ua,n,
EEN ,i iBi I d ~ifl~eet at 9:00 a.m. c,eation ,Ca federal lh,using Trust Fund..rod br, ..,dcr t,,c'. ,t
CED}.}~ik~'.~Op,"~n'd ~iS wilt meet at l:OO p.m. the l.nw h~cnme Housing Tax Credit ([.lilT(Z).
Comprehensive Land Use Planning &Zoning:
Community & Economic Comprehensive I.and Use includes the fnllhwint~ sub
Development (CED) <~ "Religious Land Use & lnstitutinnalized l'crs,,ns
Act" (RI.L/IPA); (2) takings; (3) down zoning; and (4)
-.., ......... shc~relinc development. Tbc Cem3mittcc dctctmmctX which
~:~:~.~'~ag~dlilb~f~.':" topics were appropriate for C[~I) pt,hcx :u,d wh,ch
( ..~... ~..~;...2:.={4,::,?~.,fZ ... , , tccommendauons should hc iliaale t¢~ the ap[3r¢>}~tlatc
¢(;2a~',~iltag'g~Sg~lhr, ColUmbia, SC Predato~ Lending: Th,s ,s the prac,,cc ,,h,,'d>, lender,
· ' ~2~_~ .... '_'~'., take advantage ¢,f unsuspctting }lonlt'~>~ner~ hx
Recently appointed Vice Chair Anne Sinclair h,,qL'd the h>an~ wuh excessively high rotcrest rates and/,,~ hMdcn
sprirlK meeting in Cok~n/bla, SC 'I'hu (21'21) Stc'crlrlK oftc'I1 targeting the re.st financialIx Vtl]ncrRh~c
~ ,,mmnrcc's agcnda mdudcd the hfih}wing: The C.mmincc began d~cus~i~m ,~t h¢,w the k'dtr.d
g~vcrnmcnt should pr~hihit predate,r)Icnchng
l'oliff Informer Page 1
July 2001
"~Energy, Environment & Facilities: The Committee also wt,rked on a resolut,on
presented by Ingrid Lindemann. Ci,unc mcn~cr, z\urora,
Natural Resources co, which highhghts existing NLC policy urging the fcdcral
(EENR) at closed federal facilities to facilitate timeh' rCL, SC ,tnd
j2~ · ' · . ~. ;:rt:;k. ""~ ':'..'.':.. ~5. ~
~. ': .' , .:~. :~.f:..~.~:.:.;,.:~;}:"~.. :..;]:):. ~& Intergovernmental
m~ , .... '.. ' "",h ....... :: ";. Relations (FAIR)
.................. i':nL.,..
T Com~ttee~e~S~l~'~':'' %~:':~ C ":' ' ' '
hc KI~NR Policy Committee dircctcd the Srccrmg
' c~"'M " ' "' ' ;'
(Zommntcc to devclop policy on water infrastructure ,.:~ - . . · .. ;c ,, ~ -
financing, energy policy, and the Clcan Air Act at the p,,hc> ViCe Chain: ..... } :.,i',:, ~..~ ,;;:'.-..L '~ ,-:
meeting m March. Under the chairtnanship ,~f T,.J, C0hn~mb~E:Mai~et~dtd'~i6~i~-~W~'~aHey CiW, UT[
1~3ttcrson, the con3n~ittce began to w,,rk on water MaydrPrg~emR0n'Bat~i;~'s~mitos,'CA
mirastructure financing and enerD, policy at its first II/CCtll3g ': ''
m Richmired, VA., hosted by Vice Mayor Rudtqph C. Councilmember Ruth Vreeland hosted the I'AIR sp~in~
Mc(Zollum, b The (]can Air Act will bc discussed at the mccting in Montere),, CA. Mayor Alex I'ckcrc,
Ifil Sictung (Z{munittc¢ meeting. Pcn~hr.kc Pine, FI., led the comn~ittcc ns it
fi~c three priority mpics sclcctcd bx dk F,XIR P,4tcx
Water Infrastructure Financing: The ,Xl/~cl'lckln kV:ttcl (2~n31nllttcc ]aq Mnrch: muntcq,:d bonds. tcdcLd
~cwcragc X~c'nc~cs (AMSA) ~;uthncd the intrastrutturc gap
i'tcxC'~ll:lli~nn~, t~X CtnnH~ittcc ftlCtlSCd <HI Start' I{ux{dxl~lt,, ~1,~1 hu funded in the federal I~tRlgcI it' tax Ittlt~<H~.II
u~':4c"tCd that II~c next gci~c~an~m ,~f fcdcr,d t%iM:ll/tk Municipal Bonds: T-pies Menrifled t~,r
]t,'kl]d ;t3CIt~C/C funding r,~ rcplacc dctt~i. Lmng amendments illeluded: municip,tl i~ond% t;n [3ul~hc tuct.~x
1*2uer~y Policy: ['he Amcr~c:u~s hn' Bcncr i'.ncrg} {h~,Kc~ ,~tt]tt,~l~ xxcrc charged hn' pcrs~nktl xh,l.ltlun.
Xtq,(), ;l ~ri~klp that advf,catcs the use ~,f c~al, {q3cncd mun~cq~,xl b, md law,
lj,c kX Imc }Jt)klSu'S ]"Lncrg> [3olicy~ which had J3ccn k'/uasud ()d~cr: Ilccti{,n adn/mistration t~>plcs idtllllt]ct]
I';nGronmcntal Rcn~cdiation of Chased Federal
l'oliev ln/brmer Page 2
' Human Development be diverted from the same funding source already allocated for
(HD) cities, about religious organizations t, cing exempt from the
civil rights protections of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and
about potentially harsh provisions creating additional legal
liabilities for cities and their individual officials.
iInformation
L,: . Technology and
Councilor Joe Willjams. Tulsa, OK, hosted the spring Communications (ITC)
meeting. The HD Steering Ccmm~ittee's agenda
tid ded the eono i g topics:
Welfare Reform: After a general discuss,.n ,,n welfare
representative, tbe Comn3ittcc set forth the tbllowing as
'Cp~e~P~Ze~i en ~ chael Brasher, .~buquerqR~';~-.?'.2.5-~v'.'.:..
important gnals: (1) adequately tracking welfare recipients EE-DiX~X~5'TLz'2~z.Z ............. L_=._:..._.. .:. ": '.~
and "lcavers" of the welfare systcm~ (2) allowing more
flexibility fnr education and j,,b tr:unin~ (3) making the Hosted by C~mnciln~cmbc~ (Lhris [:c~rdl, Nashville, TN,
Earned Income Tax (hcdit (EIT() casic'r to understand Chair Nanc~
and receive; and (4) better addressing ~hc needs dworking the comnlittcc through its i~ltllal rout/d .>[ d~cussions on the
families. following fi~ur priorit5 uq3tc~, ldtnllGcd bx the ITC Policy
Committee during the (Z<,ng~cssi~nAI (Litx (Zonfcrence:
Education: Aftc~ :~ di~cu~s~t,n wHh ]<~cal ()klahoma convergence, spectrum. pHXAC> And dag~ral d,vidc.
educators about the rclati.nshq~ rh:~r t mc~ can have with
their schoni h~mrdb and stllX'l'll31ttlt]t'lll~, G,nm3ittcc Convergence: Th~s xxas ,he tctm ch~cn h~ the conmlittee to
members agreed that Talc [ ,>t Ihc IL[ct~c't~tarx& Secondary capture the general c,mccm ,d [~cNc'~x~n~ ~ q~gni~cant local
Education Act (I'LSI'~A) was ~crx IH1pt~rLHll tn providing role and voice m the Icgt/13rl~,n .Hid ovc'~sight of
in poverty, but that 113tH'c ficxfi~ihtx xx<,u]d l~c cvcIl bcttcr. emeged that an cntuch new IrMa] {'l:liIlt xx l~l l,: Dr "paradigm" is
They also agreed tha~ the blth~ldtLdq wll}l Disabilities required looncompass ncx~ tcchl/{,ll,glcq.
ICducation Act (II)I'LA) m~pr<,13td5 C~H~SHIUtCS
without adequate Gmdm3~ concerns about the uuc .~xA~[ahdHx ~d ~pcc:t~um for public
safety uses were the prm~ar3 h,cus m this p.u't ~,f the meeting.
Health/Mental Health: Thc (2, mmmtcc focused its
Health/Mental llcahh d~scu~s,m .~ ~outh suicide and Privacy, Security and Encrypdon: Since NLC's Puhlic
health awareness, rc~.t~rccs. and paHt> t~ provision of areas in which p~tcnt~al isNucs m~ght cxl51 arc: licensing.
physical health scrv~cc~ The (e~lllt/31ttcc agreed that taxation, permitting,
school based clinics wrxcd .t~ one ~tplv, ~pnalc conduit Q}r which citrus gathc~ pc~v ,~Ltlh ~dctm~3;ddt clR'n~ mh~m~at~on.
Faith-Based Initiatives: (~mmmtct ;~c;nbcr~ began to begin to develop
draft policy languagt m ~ulq~.,rl ,,1 IrK.i[ p;trtr~crshIps assure the widc axafi,d,dH~ ,~1 ,tdx,lntcd t~,lll[3tltCr d~d Intcrr~ct
Policy Informer Page 3
Jtd'e 2001
re public Safety & Crime Transportation Infrastructure
Prevention (PSCP) &Services (TIS)
the spring meeting. The PSCP Committee began policy on the reauthorization of the Transportation Equity,
developing policy recommendations and amendments for Act in the 21'l Century (TEA 21), pipeline safety, competition
school safety, media violence, the reintcgration of former in the airline industry, the Airlinc Passenger Bill of Rights, and
prisoners into society, and drug control policy. passenger r:ul issues at its spring meeting in Hoffman F. states,
School Safety: The steering committee focused on policies IL, hosted by Trustee Edwin Frank.
to address thc need for more uniform reporting and Reauthorization of TEA-21: Pat Moss, TIS Chair, appointed a
definitions of violent incidents at schools. Fostering effective Special Task Force to address policy on d~is law. The Task
partnerships between law enfnrcement, mental health Force met for a full day before the Committee meenng
programs and school districts, and closing loopholes in convened. A representative from the Federal Highxvay
federal firearms laws impacting youth were itcms of Administration 0:HWA). stressed the importance ofguarantced
discussion. funding, firewalls, and tl~e transit program in the current law,
Media Violence: The Committee focused on policy and speculated that these idcas will be included in the
recommendations that balance ~;irst Amendment rights of Administration's version of reauthorization. Addrcssing the
nation's cl,ngcstion problem is a priority on Capitol ttill. and
~rce spcccl~ with implications of violent cl>ntcnt in
FI [XVA su.~csted that programs to tackle this issue might also
marestream media, such as urging the f~dcral government to
bc' part of a rcauthorizatlim package. Representatives from tbc
ttxnd a comprchcnsivc study ,~n the behavioral elfrots of
media violence upon youth. Other op~ons were discussed, An~erican Pt~blic Transpc~rtation Association (APTA), the
American Road and Transportation Builders Associat~m
.ucl~ as flexible funding tot intomet filtering sofarare and
,,tl~cr m<,nit<~ring devices f~}r libraries and schools, along (ARTBA), and the Sm'Gcc Transportation Policy Project
~th m<,re sclfrcgulati~m by tt~c cmcrtainmcm industry, (STPP) smn~n~arizcd tl~c~t' priorities for rcauthorization at II~c
~cl~ as a "V~cwers' Bill .f Rights," whid~ w,~uld include mcctb~g.
defined principles curtailing childrcn's access to violent Airline Issues: The C~mmittcc covered a variety of topics.
materials, including anti compctmvc practices by airline~, mergers c,t
Prisoner Rcent~: The c~mm~ittce's policy richate ccntct'cd n~aF~r a~rlincs. and tedoral pr~grams created to serve sn~all
c-mm~m~t~cs (e.g., Small (Z~mm~mity Air Service l)cvcl.pmcnt
tq~,m increased c.ordinati~.~ among the criminal justice
~x~tcm, s~cial services. and community based resources that l~r.gram, llic Rcgli,r~.fi A~t Service Incentive l~rogram)
.. cnccdcd t,~ help reintc~ate more than 500,000 prisoners, I.cgislatu~g the v,~luntarx customer service agreement (prepared
xvhc~ arc released annually back into society. by the Air Transp,~rtatlim Association and in~plcmcnted last
year h~ m~st maj.r earners) was also a t~,p~c .( discussion.
Drug Control: The (Z~mmittcc also hcgan considering Discussion groups determined that NLC's policy shc,ukl
~q~proprxatc federal responses to medical prc~hlcms silent {,n mergers, and the committee determined that
experienced by policc ot~ccrs involved in unprotected sh.uld s~pp<~rt all ot the fcdcrai programs created t{~ incrcaqc
exposure to substances m illcgal mcthamphetaminc labs. service t. small c{mm~unmcs. The Committee was cvcnl5~
diwdcd ~n D,w the tedoral gc~vernment should increase airline
her; :;.i~q.'~o~it~'6"~:~ii'h~ ti~es during c.mpcfit,.n, and ,m wl~cthcr cities have a ~takc
th6"A~a~ta:~:e'~d/~ of Ci~di'~'b~' "Wddnesday, Passenger Bill of g.~li t~
DeCember 5,'~i?: ...... :;}:ik'~2':' Pipeline Safety: Tl~c (,,remittee' v,,tcd t~, m,,d.tx a c'urrcm
EENR, HD, e ·
- ' ' ::,-~.;t:'. ,.,.:~i 'q~tl:OOp.m. Passenger Rail: 'f},c
~: ~5~ · . .:{:.
sO ;Ind 1~ ,c:~ht mc's ~ dcx cl~ ~l~ lix.~li speed rail
Poli~ ln/~rmer Page 4
July 2001
City of Iowa City
Schedule of Outstanding Debt
As .of June 30, 2001
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 27, 2001
TO: City Council
City Manager
FROM: Kevin O'Malley, Director of Finance
RE: Outstanding Debt Schedule
Attached you will find several schedules summarizing the City's outstanding debt obligations as of
June 30, 2001. This includes general obligation (GO); parking, sewer and water revenue bonds.
Schedules for the individual bond issues outline what funds will be used to make the principal and
interest payments each year.
If you have any questions concerning this information, please contact me at 356-5053.
City of Iowa City
Schedule of Outstanding Debt
As of June 30, 2001
Table of Contents
Debt Obligation by Individual Bond Issue ............................................................................1
Debt Repayment Schedule by Fiscal Year .............................................................................2
Total Debt Outstanding & Debt Margin ................................................................................3
General Obligation Bonds:
Total Outstanding Debt ..............................................................................................4
Debt Repayment Schedule by Fiscal Year .................................................................5
Individual GO Issues ..................................................................................................6
Debt Repayment Costs per Capita (Fiscal Years 1998 - 2002) ..................................17
Parking Revenue Bonds:
Debt Repayment Cost per Parking Space (Fiscal Years 1998 - 2002) ......................17
Total Outstanding Debt ..............................................................................................18
Debt Repayment Schedule by Fiscal Year .................................................................19
Individual Issues ........................................................................................................20
Water Revenue Bonds:
Total Outstanding Debt ..............................................................................................24
Debt Repayment Schedule by Fiscal Year .................................................................25
Individual Issues ........................................................................................................26
Debt Repayment Costs per User (Fiscal Years 1998 - 2002) ...................................28
Sewer Revenue Bonds:
Debt Repayment Costs per User (Fiscal Years 1998 - 2002) ...................................28
Total Outstanding Debt ..............................................................................................29
Debt Repayment Schedule by Fiscal Year .................................................................30
Individual Issues ........................................................................................................31
City of Iowa City
Debt Obligation as of June 30, 2001
by individual bond issue
TOTAL FISCAL
PRINCIPAL & YEAR DEBT
INTEREST IS PAID IN
PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS FULL
91 GO 225,000 12,600 237,600 2002
92 GO 490,000 26.950 516,950 2002
92CAPLOAN 1,680,000 316,110 1,996,110 2007
94 GO 2,175,000 204,450 2,379,450 2004
95 GO 4,240,000 749~813 4,969,813 2007
96 GO 5,000,000 2,221,688 7.221,688 2015
97 GO 52 Million 3,100,000 502,888 3,602,888 2007
97 GO 5 54 Million - Water 4,700,000 2,015,188 6,715,188 2017
98 GO 6,775,000 2,019,788 8,794,788 2013
99GO 8,075,000 3,336,163 11~411,163 2018
00 GO 13,605,000 7,437,810 21,042,810 2018
01 GO 11,500,C00 4.455,209 15,955,209 2016
Total G,O. BOnds Outstanding 61,565,000 23,298,654 84,863,654
93SEWER 29.210,000 11,709,432 40,919,432 2013
96 SEWER 17,000,000 11,987.656 28,987,656 2022
97SEWER 9,925,000 7,155,250 17,080.250 2023
99SEWER 6,770,000 3,384,815 10,154,815 2020
00 SEWER 12,000,000 9,862.195 21,862,195 2026
Total Sewer Revenue BOnds Outstanding 74,905,000 44,0S9,348 119,004,348
99 WATER REVENUE SOND 9.060,000 6,321,095 15,381,095 2025
00 WATER REVENUE BOND 13.000,000 10,608,329 23,608.329 2026
Total Water Revenue Bonds Outstanding 22,060,000 16,929,424 38,989,424
92CJ~PLOAN 1,680,000 316,110 1,996,110 2C07
92 PARKING 160,000 4,240 164,240 2002
95 PARKING 1,120,000 127,466 1,247,466 2004
99PARKING 11,350,000 10,423,216 21,773,216 2025
99 PARKING ANTICIPATION NOTE 1,650,000 56,719 1,706,719 2002
Total Parking Revenue Bonds Outstanding 15,960,000 t0,927,751 26,887,75t
Deduct rg2 CAP LOAN" Once, it is listsd above in both G,O, and Parking
Listed in G,O. because it is treated as G O for debt margin.
Listed in Parking since entire issue is repaid from Parkif'~J,
92 CAP LOAN (t,680,000) (316,1t0) (1,996.110} 2007
Total All Issues; t72,810,000 94,939,066 267,749,066
Debt Repayment Schedule by Fiscal Year
For all Outstanding Bond Issues
- As of June 30, 2001 -
general obligation (GO) bonds, revenue bonds and parking anticipation notes
I I { PRINCIPAL
TOT,~ PRINCI,A. ~ INTEREST PRI,CIPAL INTEREST i PRINCIPAL! INTEREST ~ PRI.CIPA. INTEREST
iPRINCIPAL& PAID FOR BY : PAID FOR BY PAIDFORBY PAJDFORBY PAIDFORBY PAIDFORBY PAIDFORBy PAIDFORBY BEGINNING;
PRINCIPAL ~ INTEREST PAYMENTS RE~NUES
~2 11,275,~ 9.151,370 ~,4~.370 3,597,141' 2,186.716 3,428,423 4,321,015 2,405,~0 889,111 1,~,4~ 1,7~,528 172,810.~
~ 1,755,~0 __48,831 1,803,831 0 0 23,238; 910,000 25,594 1,755,~
Total Debt Outstanding by Fiscal Year
· As of June 30, 200'1 -
PRINCIPAL & I
, PRINCIPAL INTEREST INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL ~ INTEREST i PRINCIPAL ! INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST
~ BALANCE BALANCE BALANCES BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE r BALANCE ~ BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE
BEGINNING BEGINNING BEGINNING PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY pAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR 81
FISCAL OF FISCAL OF FISCAL OF FISCAL PROPERTY PROPERTY SEWER SEWER PARKING PARKING WATER FUNE WATER FUND
YEAR YEAR YEAR YEAR TAXES TAXES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES
1~ ~,108.475.065.031,270100.~.270- ;~:;:?:,~+. 6,229,46755.22,,70641,589,9304.746.01,587.669 13,639.306 6.615,683
2000 5 151,585,000 93,394,061 244,979,581 15,480,324 69,725,260 51,751,396 4,120,000 1,028,876~ 34,898,006 22,544,999
2®2 172,810.094.939.0,5287,748.585ii46.586.330,5.363.811;'0~',;?,5;;-',~~21.102.258
2003 161,535,000 85,787,696 247,322,696: ' 43,0,9,197 16,377,096 73',20~,414 , ~ , 31,702,589 19,347,700
2004 152,695,000 77,372,959 230,067,959 i 39,800,421 14,338,482 69,746, 4 J 36,048,622i 12,920,000~.__ 9,249,471 30,100,439 17,736,383
2006 134,705,000 61,917,723 196,622,723 } 33,366,194 10,700,780 62,536,708; 28,683,973' ~ 7,791,366 27,137,098 14,741,604
20,7 125,875,000 54,871,282 180,546,282 30,228,832 9,098,780 36,768,354 25,303,580 11,045,000 7,114,022 25,632,814 13,354,000
20,8 116,425,000 48,258,440 154,713,440 27,125,323 7,630,500 54,830,000 22,154,833 10,300,000 6,471,519 24,079,678 12,043,498
2009 108,315,000 42,188,212 150,003,212 24,584,258 6,321,011 58,810,000 19,191,251 10,035,000 5,865,924 22,885,743 10,810,026
2010 99,800,000 30,517,441 130,397,441 22,0,3,183 5,119,446 46,545,000 16,480,241 9,665,000 5,281,627 21,006,808 9,630,127
2011 91,058,000 31,295,785 122,350,785 19,345,980 4,030,144 42,040,000 14,016,453 9,275,000 4,719,654 20,394,028 8,523,534
2012 81,810,000 26,548,470 108,358,470 16,602,620 3,076,002 37,270,000 11,815,430 8,865,0,0 4,181,182 19,072,30C 7,475,247
2013 72,135,000 22,302,271 94,437,271 13,783,113 2,246,489 32,215,000 9,894,211 8,458,000 3,667,384 17,701,886 6,494,186
2016 48,625,000 12,400,966 61,025,966 5,800,000 566,120 22,515,000 5,559,311 6,995,000 2,287,848 13,265,00C 3,987,688
2018 35,975,000 7,647,761 43,622,761 1,685,000 89,113 17,615,000 3,348,007 5,895,000 1,518,530 10,780,00C 2,692,111
2019 30,010,000 5,776,148 30,786,148 0 0 14,855,000 2,449,122 5,295,000 1,184,430 9,750,00( 2,142,596
2020 25,520,000 4.233,587 29,753,367 0 0 12,170.000 1,698,972_ 4,665,000 886,615 8,685,000 1,648,000
2021 20,760,000 2,944,544 23,704,544 0 O~ 9,205,000 1,105,994 3,995,000 627,100 7,560,000 1.211,400
O0 3,890,000
2023 11,540,000 1,135,778 12,675,778 0a 0 375,925 2,535,000 234,100 5,115,000 525,703
2,40,,000
20264,930,~2~:~038;5.155.031~ oi1.~.~:~00 91.712895.026.6002,300.~.6.469
2026 1,755,000 1,803,831 I _. 0i ~ 23,237 0 0 910,000 25,594
The city's fiscal policy states that "debt incurred as a general obligation of the City of Iowa City shall not exceed statutory limits: presently 5% of
the total assessed value of property within the corporate limits as established by the City Assessor." Outstanding general obligation debt for fiscal
year 2002 totals 2.9% of total assessed value as of June 30, 2001. Fiscal policy also states that "the debt service (property tax) levy shall not
exceed 25% of the total levy in any one fiscal year. The certified debt service levy for fiscal year 2002 is 2.94479, or 19.8% of the total levy
(14.84983).
General Obligation (GO) - Outstanding Debt
by Fiscal Year
,
I R
PRINCIPAL NTE EST J PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL BALANCE
: PRINCIPAL INTEREST ~ BALANCE BALANCE ! BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE TO TO BE PAID
i: P FOR BY FOR BY . FOR BY FOR BY !BY ! WATER
YEAR YEAR YEAR PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES R S REVENUES ~ REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES , REVENUES
1999 40,400,000 13,453,781 55,266,181 ! 18,278,907 5.245,717 , 519,070 2,110.000+ 541.745 13,839.385 5.615.863
2000 59,725,000 23,745.940 84,280.865 38.206.134 15,486,824 2.155,260~ 372,071 1,900,000 423.888 12,698,606 4,871,442
2001 55,275,000 21,486,141 77.000,091 35,530,349 14,149,534 1,731,837 245.868 1.680,000 316,110 11.567,814 4.182,913
2002 61,565.000 23,298.654 84.863.654 46,666,338 18,563.811 1,731,837 245.868 1,680.000 316,110 11.486,825 4,172,864
2003 56,160,000 20,361,741 76,521,741 43.069,197 16,377.096 1,308,414 160,865 1,435,000' 230,173 10.347.383 3,593.608
2004 51,255,000 17,661.603 68,916,603 39,868,421 14,338,482 906,141 96,462 1,175,000 156.485 9,305,433 3.070,173
2005 46,150.000 15,187.551 61.337,551 36,473.556 12.443,063 505,062 51,474 905,000 95.798 8.266,382 2,597,217
2006 41,680,000 12,950,408 54,630,408 33,366,194 10,700.780 336,708 25,842 620,000 48,880 7.357,098 2.174,905
2007 37.140,000 10.921.491 48,061.491 30,228,832 9,098,780 168,354 8,628 320,000 16,640 6,422.814 1,797,443
2008 32.595,000 9,105,280 41,700.280 27.125,323 7,638,590 0 0 0 0 5.469.67~ 1,466.690
2009 29,490,000 7,504,815 36,994.815 24,584,258 6.321.011 0 0 0 0 4,905.743 1,183,804
2010 26,345.000 6,048,525 32,393,525 22,003,193 5,119.446 0 0 0 0 4,341,808 929,079
2011 23.105,000 4.738,923 27,843,923 19,345.980 4,036,144 0 0 0 0 3.759.02C 702,778
2012 19,760.000 3,582.918 23.342,918 16,602,620 3,076,602 0 0 0 0 3,157,38C 506,315
2013 16,320,000 2,587,630 18,967,630 13,783,113 2,246,489 0 0 0 0 2.536,888 341,141
2014 12,765,000 1,759,963 14.524,963 10,867,458 1,551,369 0 0 0 0 1,897,543 208,594
2015 9,670,000 1.107,660 10.777,660 8.411,803 997.780 0 0 0 0 1,258.198 109,880
2016 6.450,000 611.120 7,061,120 5,850.000 566,120 0 0 0 0 600,000; 45,006
2017 3,605.000 278,190 3,883,190 3.305.000 263.190 0 ~( 0 0 300.000 15.00C
2018 1,685.000 89,113 1.774,113 1,685,000 89,113~ 0 ~ _ O~ O;
Note: Outstanding debt from parking Capital Loan Notes Sedes1992 are included here for debt margin calculations on general obligation bonds.
General Obligation Debt Repayment
by Fiscal Year
i PRINCIPAL INTEREST
I ~ PRINCIPAL ! INTEREST ~ PAID FOR PAID FOR
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAID I PAID FOR / PAID FOR PAID FOR ~, PAID FOR BY BY
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY FOR BY BY BY BY BY WATER WATER
FISCAL INTEREST PROPERTY PROPERTY i SEWER I SEWER PARKING PARKING FUND FUND
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES
1998 3.095,000 1,651,332 4,746,332 1,654,155 690,601 431,448 167,796 200,000 127,458 809,397 665.477
1999 3,985,000 2,027,436 6,012,436 2,221,837 1,021,221 431,448 146,999 210,000 117,858 1,121,715 741,35,c
2000 4,450,000 2,259,799 6.709,799 2,687,392 1,338,182 423,423 126,203 220,000 107,778 1,119,185 687,637
2001 5,210.000 2,642,696 7,852,696 3,434,564 1.806,317 423,423 105,603 235,000 97,218 1,117,013 633.55c,
2002 5,405,000 2,936,912 8,341,912 3,597,141 2,186,716 423,423 85,003 245,000 85,938 1,139,436 579,25~
2003 4.905,000 2,700,139 7.605,139 3,200.777 2.038,613 402,273 64,403 260,000 73,688 1,041,951 523,435
2004 5,105,000 2,474,051 7,579,051 3,394,865 1,895.420 401,079 44,988 270,000 60.688 1.039,057 472,957
2005 4,470,000 2,237,144 6,707,144 3,107,362 1,742,283 168,354 25.632 285,000 46,918 909.284 422,312
2006 4,540,000 2.028,916 6,568,916 3,137,362 1,602,000 168.354 17,214 300.000 32,240 934,284 377,462
2007 4,545,000 1,816.211 6,361,211 3,103,510 1,460,190 168.354 8,626 320.000 16,64(3 953,137 330,753
2008 3,105,000 1,600,465 4,705,465 2,541,065 1,317,579 0 0 0 563,935 282,886
2009 3,145.000 1,456.290 4.601,290 2,581,065 1.201,565 0 0 0 563,935 254,725~
2010 3,240,000 1,309,603 4.549,603 2,657,213 1,083,302 0 0~ 0 (3 582,788 226.301
2011 3,345,000 1,156,005 4.501,005 2,743,360 959,542 0 ~ 0 601,640
2012 3,440,000. __ 995,288 4,435,288 _ 2,819,505 630,113 0~L' , ~ 0i ~00 620,493 165,174
2013~:;;;:~gggg627.88s4.382.~82.916,855898.120gi6g~63g.345
2014 662.3033.7,7.3632.455.855-:~.00,-~639.3,5
2015 3,220.000~ 496,540 3.716.540 2,561.803 ' ~
658, 198
2016 2,845,000 332.930 3.177,930 2,545,000 302,930 ' 6" ' ~, ' OJ 300,000 30,000
2017~:~.~189.6782.10g.g76-1.820.600174.978--~--~.~ g,
2018 . . 89,113r 1,774,113 1,685.000 89,113 ~ _ '0~ ~ ~ _~J~ 300,000 15.000
Total @ 61,565,000 23,298,654 r ~
Note: Pdndpa[ and interest payments for Parking Capital Loan Notes Series1992 are included here for debt margin calculations on general obligation bonds.
1991 $2.34 Million General Obligation {GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
The 199'1 issue provided funds for equipping the police & fire departments; the construction, reconstruction. extension. improvement, &
equipping of works & facilities useful for the collection of sewage & industrial waste in a sanitary manner. & for the collection and disposal of
surface waters & streams and the rshabllltstlon and improvement to existing city-owned parks.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL
i PRINCIPAL & pAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST PROPERTY PROPERTY SEWER SEWER BEGINNING OF
o> YEAR ~5.A~0 I [ REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
PRINCIP INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES REVENUES
__ 90.60% 9.40%
2002 ' 22 0 ~ 12.~0 237,600 . 203,850 11,416 21.150 1,184~ 225,000
Totals@e/30101 228,000l 12,600l 237,6001" 203,850~ 11,416i 21,150~ 1,1~
1992 $4.87 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
The 1992 GO bond issue refunded the callable podions of the 1985 & '1986 GO issues.
The 1985 issue provided funds for street improvements, sidewalks, alley pavement, sanitary sewers, storm sewers, culverts, sanitary sewage
pumping facilities, construction of water storage facilities & acquisition of land needed for the existing airport.
The 1986 issue provided funds for the construction, reconstruction & repairing of streets, acquisition, installation & repair of traffic control
devices, acquisition, construction, improvement of street lighting fixtures, connections and facilities, acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, enlargement, improvement and rapair of bridges, culverts, grade crossing separations and approaches thereto, including
railroad crossings, acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, repair and equipping of waterworks and a swimming pool project.
PRINCIPAL
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST BALANCE
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAJD FOR BY PAID FOR BY BEGINNING
FISCAL INTEREST PROPERTY PROPERTY WATER FUND WATER FUND OF FISCAL
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES REVENUES REVENUES YEAR
2002 490.000 26,950 516,950 373.662 20,551 116.338 6,399 490!000
,
,
490~000 l"' 61399
Totals@6/30101 26,950 516~950 ] 373,662r 20~55t~ 116,3381
1994 $7.37 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
The 1994 issue provides funds for the construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement, & equipping of storm & sanitary sewers, including sewage treatment plant
improvements & construction of storm water detention facilities; the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, repair and equipping of waterworks &
extensions & real & personal property, useful for providing potable water to city residents, including water treatment plant acqulsitiof~ and design; and the rehabilitation
and improvement of existing city parks; and reconstruction & improving the Roped A. Lee Community Recreation Center, Including rerooflng and replacement of flooring.
IPRINCIPAL
TOTALP.,NC,PAL,.TE.EST PR,NC,.AL ,.TEREST P.I.CIPALB .OE
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY P Y BEGINNING
co FISCAL INTEREST PROPERTY PROPERTY SEWER SEWER WATER FUND REVENUES OF FISCAL
WATER FUND
YE~. PRINCIPAL ~NTEREST' PAYMENTS : TAX~ZS [ T~XES REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES YEAR
6,985= 725,000
Totals @ 6130/01 2,115,000 204,450~ 2,379,450, 1,0~,0,950i 96,9091 698,175) 65,628 445,875
1995 $8.5 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
The issue provides funds for the construction, reconstruction and repair of street improvements; the construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement and
equipping of the sewage treatment plant and sanitary and storm sewers; the reconstruction and improvement of waterways, and real and personal property, userut for
the protection or reclamation of property situated within the corporate limits from floods or high waters; the reconstruction, improvement and repair of the water
works; and the construction and equipping of soccer recreation fields.
TOTAL ' PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL INTEREST ~ PRiNCiPAL iNTEREST =' PRINCIPAL
FISC~ INTEREST PROPER~ PROPER~ ~ SEWER WATER FUND WA~R FUND BEGINNING OF
YE~ PRINCIP~ INTEREST PAYMENTS : T~ES ; T~ES : REVENUES ; REVENUES; REVENUES , REVENUES, FISCAL YE~
' 18.24% ~ : 23.68% L ~ 57.88%
~ ~ 705,000~ ~6~ ~7~86~ ~; "~0~'~ ~8.~' '34.650," 4080~ 82.52g 2,820,000
200~ ~ 70'5.00~ 107,3~6 8122~5~* ~592' ~?~ i~',~ ~32' '~ 62,126 2,115,00C
.... ~ ....... 777,08~ ' ~28,59~E 1~;~ 16~ ~' ~ 41,724 1,4~',0~
-I
~ J ,
136,766 )
6/30101 4,240,000 749,813 4,989,813 713,376 1,012,512 ,
1995 $6.1 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
The issue provides funds for the costs of improvements and extensions to the Municipal Waterworks Plant and System, construction,
reconstruction and repairing of bridges and street improvements and the construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement and equipping of
works and facilities for the collection and disposal of surface waters and streams.
PRINCIPAL
TOTAL PRINCIPAL ~ INTEREST PRINCIPAL : INTEREST PAiD ~ BALANCE
PRINCIPAL & PAiD FOR BY PAID FOR BY PAiD FOR BY ~ FOR BY ~ SEGINNING
FISCAL INTEREST = PROPERTY t PROPERTY WATER FUND WATER FUND , OF FISCAL
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES REVENUES i REVENUES I YEAR
~ 24.59%i ! 75.41~
' ~6~ ': 250.0001 ~59.8~5!' ~6g~ ~ ' ~,,ZT~ ~3~8_91~ ~ 188.525i, 195 9341 5,OO0,OOC
"20o4' ~ ~ 2~5.0~ 2~,~,9~ ~0,9"25 ' 67.~3T' ' ~8,014T '~ 4,4~5.00c
'2005 ~ 3'00:000~ 2~2,86~ ' 522,E~63~ ~3~7~0~ 54,~02: 226,230' 168,0611 4,200,00C
~ ' ~(j 20~,~13 " 508,313 ; ' ' ~ 5~,22~ ~ ~,900,00~
157,088
2010
2011 400,000 121,288 521,288 98,360 29,825 301,640 91,463 2,200,000
2012 425,000 ~J,688 524,688 104,508 24,513 320,493 ~5,17~ 1,800,00C
2013 450,000 76,313 526,313 110,655 16,765 339,345 57,547 1,375.000
2014 450.000 51,338 501,338 110,655 12,624 339,345 38,7~
2015 475,000 26,363 501,363 116,8031 6,483 358,198 19,880 475,00~
Totals @ 6/30/01 5~000,000 2~221,688 7,2211688 t,229~500~ 546~313 31770,500 1,67.51375
1997 $5.2 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
This issue funds the costs of the construction, reconstruction and repairing of bridges, street and public walicway
improvements; the construction, reconstruction, extension, improvement and equipping of works and facilities for the
collection and disposal of surface waters and streams; the rehabilitation and improvement of existing city parks; the
reconstruction, extension and improvement of the municipal airport; the improvement and equipping of the ~ibrary,
including roof and carpet replacement; heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) system; the expansion of Fire
Station #3, the renovation of the City's Animal Shelter and replacement of portions of the Civic Center roof.
PRINCIPAL
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST BALANCE
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY BEGINNING
FISCAL INTEREST PROPERTY PROPERTY OF FISCAL
YEAR PRINCIPAL [ INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES YEAR
2002 525,000 144,519 669.519 525.000 144,519 3.100,000
2003 525,000 120,238 645,238 525.000 120,238 2,575,000
2004 525,000 95,956 620,956 525,000 95,956 2,050,000
2005 525,000 71.675 596,675 525,000 71,675 1,525,000
2006 500,000 47,000 547,000 500,000 47.000 1,000,000
2007 500,000 23,500 523,500 500,000 23,500 500.000
Totals @ 6130101 3,100,0001 502,8881 3,602,888 3,100,000! 502,888i
1997 $5.54 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
This issue funds the cost of various water projects Including iowa River Power
Dam, Site Development, Water Main and Engineering.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL ! INTEREST PAID PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY ' FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST WATER FUND WATER FUND BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL iNTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 275,000 232,344 507,344 275,000 232,344 4,700!00C
2003 275,000 218,938 493,938 275,000 218,938 4,425!00(:
2004 275,000 205,531 480,531 275,000 205,531 4,150!00(:
2005 275,000 192,125 467,125 275,000 192,125 3,875!00C
2006 300,000 178,650 478,650 300,000 178,650 3,60__0!00(:
2007 300,000 163,950 463,950 300,000 163,950 3,300!00C
2008 300,000 149,250 449,250 300,000 149,2EI 3,QOO!OQC
2009 300,000 134,550 434,550 300,000 134,550 2,70__0!00(
2010 300,000 119,850 419,850 300,000 119,850 2,400,00(:
2011 300,000 105,000 405,000 300,000 105,000 2,100!00(:
2012 300,000_ 90,000 390,000 300,000 90,000 1,800,000
2013 75.000 375.000 300.000 75.000 1.500.000
2014 60,000 360,000 300,000 60,000~ 1,2~
2015 300,000{ 45.000 345,000 300.000 15,000
45.000 900,000
__. 2016 300,000 30,000 330,000 300,000 _.
30,000 600,000
15,000 _ , 9'
2017 300,000 315,000 309 00 3O0,O00
Totals @ 6/30101 4,700,000 21015,188 ! 61715~188, 4,700,0001 2t0151188~
1998 $8.5 Miliion General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue: -
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
This issue funds the costs of the acquisition of land for streets and sewers; improvements to streets, bridges,
sidewalks and public ways; the rehabilitation and improvement of city parks; the reconstruction, extension
and improvement of fie municipal airport; the reconstruction, improvement and repair of water works
property; and the reconstruction, extension, improvement and equipping of works and facilities for the
collection and disposal of surface waters and streams and detention facilities.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAID PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST PROPERTY PROPERTY BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES FISCAL YEAR
2002 575.000 309.800 884.800 575,000 309,800 6,775.000
2003 575,000 284,500 859,500 575,000 284.500 6,200.000
2004 575.000 258.913 833.913 575,000 258.913 5.625.000
2005 575,000 233.038 808,038 575.000 233,038 5,050,000
2006 575,000 207,163 782, 163 575,000 207.163 4,475.000
2007 [ _ 575,000 181',288 756,288 575,000 181,288 3.900,000
2008 _ 575,000 155,413 730,413 575.000 ~__ 155,413, 3,325,000
2009 550,000 129,250 679,250 550,000 129,250~ 2,750,000
2010 550.000 103,950 _ 653,950 ~ 550,000 103,950 2,200,000
2011 550,000 [ 78.100 628, 100 550,000 78.100 1,650,000
~ 2012 550,000J 52,250 602,250 550,000 52,250 1.100,000
__ 2013 550,000i 26,125 576.125 550,000 26.125 550,000
Totals @ 6130/01 6,775,000J 2,019,788 8,794,788 6,775,000i 2,019,788[
1999 $9 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
This issue funds construction of Civic Center 3rd Floor, Library Computer replacement, Library ICN room, Police
2nd Floor Design, Public Works Complex. Scanion Gym, Art, Airport Master Plan-Land Acquisition, Captain Irish
PkwyoAct/Dodge, Downtown Streetscape, Iowa Ave. Streetscape, Park Accessibility Programs, Park Development,
Park Footbridge Replacements, Park Parking Lot Improvements. Park Shelter Improvements, Park Sidewalk
Rep|acements, South Site Soccer Fields, S. Sycamore Regional Stormwater Detention, Summit St. Bridge Repl.,
WooIf Ave-Newton/River St.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAID PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST PROPERTY PROPERTY BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES rTAXES FISCAL YEAR
;;,~I:;85: :,~;;[476.000~361.g608.076.00°
~ ~475.000:- 321.876796675,:;;:0°0°~I;;:~;7.600.0®
2008 475.0001 240.113, 715.113 : 475000 240,113~ 5.225,000
20~_~ ~ '~0~ 21~688' 694,68~ ' 47~2000' 2197.d~8: 4,750.000
2010 199,263~ 674,263 i 475,000i 199,26~3i 4,275,000'
20. 475.000, 178,383! 683.363 475.~06~ :'5::;~;I 3.~00.000-
2012 475.07~_0 156,988 631.988 i ~'%75.0007 3,325.000
_ 2013, _ 4~80. ~ 610,138 ] 475,000[ 135,138 2.850.000
2014 475,000 112,813 587,813
475 000 112,813 2,375.000
2015 475,000 90.250 565.250 ~ ' '~ 90,250 1,900,000
2016 475,000 ~7,688 .~42,688 475.000! 67.688 1,425,000'
2017 476,®0 48, 12~' 820.126 :;~:O000~J 45.125 950.000
2018 475,000 22.563 497,563 22.563 475,000
Totals @ 6/30101 8,075,000 3,336,163 111411,163 J 8,0751000~ 3~336,163
2000 $14.31 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
This issue funds construction of GIS Systems, Airport Master Plan, Hwy. 6-SidewalkJDrainage Fire Apparatus
Public Works Complex, Art, Downtown Streetscape, Iowa Ave. Streetscape, Park Accessibility Programs, Park
Development, Park Restroom Replacement, Cemetery Expansion, Wetherby Park Development, Park Playground
Equipment, City Park Stage, Mormon Trek-Abbey Lane/Hwy. 1, Airport Terminal, Civic Center Roof Repair, Walden
Woods Park, Tennis Court Renovation, Finance/Human Resources Computer System, Parks Maintenance Facility,
Civic Center 3rd Floor, Iowa Ave. Trail, River Street Paving, S. Sycamore Regional Stormwater Detention, Foster
Road-Phase 2
: I i
I
TOTAL i PRINCIPAL PAID INTEREST PAID !' PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & FOR BY FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST ' PROPERTY PROPERTY JBEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS TAXES ; TAXES ~ FISCAL YEAF
2002 1.11,.598 ,19.000, 70,.598=13.606.009
2003, ~ ' 1,084,098i 400,O00L 684,098i13,195,000
2004 5~0,000 ~>4.098,'1,244.098' 580,000 '664,098}12,795,000
200~ ' ~ 610.~j~ 635.098; 1,245,098' 61'0.~0+ 635,098~12,215.00~
20~ ' ~0.000, ~:~ ,.244.608 ~0~ ~9..~= ,1 ,s08.000
" 200~ " 67~,00b~ 1,247.598f 675,000:' 572'598i10.9S5,000
. 2006 710.~838.~s1.248.~,8710.00058~:~gr 10.290.000
2009 745,000503,3481,248,348~745,0009,580 000
2010 785,000 466,098 1,251,098 785,000 466.o98] ~
2011 830,000 426,063 1,256,063 830,000 426,063 8,050,000
2012 870,000 383,733 1,253,733 870,000 383,733 7,220,000
2013 i 920,000 339,363 1,259,363 920,000 339,363 6,350,000
2014 970,000 291,983 1,261,983 970,000 291,983 5,430,000
2015 1,025,000 241,058 1,266,058 1,025,000 241,058 4,460,000
2016 1,080,000 186,733 1,266,733 1,080,000 186,733 3,435,000
2017 1,145,000 128,953 1,273,953 1,145,000 128,953 2,355,000
2018 1,210,000 66,550 1,276,550 1,210,000 66,550 1,210,000
Totals @ 6/30/01 13,605,000 7,437,810 21~042,8t0 13,605,000 7,437,810 '
2001 $11.5 Million General Obligation (GO) Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
This bond funds the construction, reconstruction, improvement and repair of streets, water mains/extensions, storm
water drainage systems and sanitary sewer facilities; extension and improvement of the municipal airport and cemetery
facilities; the equipping of fire, police, street and civil defense departments; acquisition of a GIS system; Civic Center
HVAC Improvements; construction of a downtown transit interchange facility and the acquisition, enlargement,
improvement and equipping of a Transit Intermodal Facility, Public Works Complex, skateboard facilities and a new city
park; and improvements to existing city parks and Mercer's baseball field complex.
: ! PRINCIPAL
: TOTAL I INTEREST PAiD I BALANCE
PRINCIPAL & FOR BY FOR BY ~]BEGINNING
FISCAL ]INTEREST PROPERTY i PROPERTY OF FISCAL
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST ; PAYMENTS TAXES TAXES ~ YEAR
~002 ~ ~5:0_0,,0_0_0~,_ ~4_82,5_7~9 J _ .~§2~,57g , _ ~500.0004 482,579 11,500,000
2003 685,000 482,105 1,167,105 ~85,q00~ 482,105 11,000,000
2~" ~ 700,000 r .454,~'05 T 1,154,7'0~ t 700,000 ! 454,705 10,315,000
~' ~0~' ' ~ .... 1,146,705 720,000 ~ 426,705 9,615,000
- 1,142,906 746, 00! 397, 05 8.695.000
___ 2007 670,000J 368,105 ~ 1,038,105 670,000 368,105 8,150,000
2008 695,000 339,630 1,034,630 695,000 339,630 7,480,00~0
2009 725,000 310,093 1,035,093 725,000 310,093 6,785,000
2010 755,000 279,280 1,034,280 755,000 279,280 6,060,000
2011 790,000 247,193 1,037,193 790,000 247,193 5,305,000
2012 820.000 212,630 1,032,630 820,000 212,630 4,515,000
2013 860,000 175,730 1.035,730 860,000 175,730 3,695,000
2014 900,000 136,170 1,036,170 900,000 136,170 2,835,000
2015 945,000 93,870 1,038,870 945,000 93,870 1,935,00J
2016 990,000 48,510 1,038,510 990,000 48,510 990,000
Totals @ 6/30101 [ lt,500,O001 4,455,2091 15,955,209[ 11,500,000~ 4,455,209
General Obligation Debt
Cost per Capita
160.00
140.00
120.00
100.00 - .-
· :
80.00 -- . - -
60.00 -.< "~ ....
.~.] .'
40.00
20,00 ·
.-.: S:.-,',?;.,:... ~!.~ ,,~;~ .. ~.,.
0.00 ...... , ......... , ......... , ....... ~ ..........
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Payments on general obligation debt come from property tax revenue.
The annual portion of property tax dollars (per capita) dedicated to
principal and interest payments is shown above.
Parking Revenue Debt Payments
Daily Cost per Parking Space
$4.00 $3.72
$3.50
$3.00
$2.50
~ '.
$2.00 "· '.
$1.50
$1.00 ! :
$0.50 "
$ _ i,'. ....
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Parking revenue bond payments are generated through parking
operations, This graph illustrates the average daily cost per space at
ramp facilities to fund principal and interest payments each fiscal year.
17
Parking Revenue Bonds
Outstanding Debt by Fiscal Year
I INTEREST I BALANCE TO BALANCE TO
~ PRINCIPAL BALANCE TOTAL I BE PArD FOR BE PAID FOR
BALANCE BEGINNING PRINCIPAL & ! BY BY
FISCAL BEGINNING OF OF FISCAL INTEREST ~ PAR. KING PAP, KING
YEAR FISCAL YEAR YEAR PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES
2002 15,960,000 10,927,751 26.887,751 15,960,000 10,927,751
2003 13,555,000 10,038,639 23,593,639 13,555,000 10,038,639
2004 12,920,000 9,249,471 22,169,471 12,920,000 9.249,471
2005 12,255,000 8,501,746 20,756,746 12,255,000 8,501,746
2006 11,665,000 7,791,366 19,456,366 11.665.000 7,791,366
2007 11,045,000 7,114,022 18,159,022 11,045,000 7.114,022
2008 10,390,000 6,471,519 16,861,519 10.390,000 6,471,519
2009 10,035,000 5,865,924 15,900,924 10,035,000 5,865,924
2010 9,665,000 5,281,627 14,946,627 9.665,000 5,281,627
2011 9,275,000 4,719,654 13.994,654 9,275,000 4,719,654
2012 8,865,000 4,181,182 13,046,182 8,865,000 4.181,182
2013 6,435,000 3,667,3~Y~ 12,102,384 8.435,000 3,667,384
2014 7,980,000 3,179,584 11,159,584 7,980,000 3,179,584
2015 7,500,000 2,719,249 10,219,249 7,500,000 2,719,249
2016 6,995,000 2,287,848 9,282,848 6.995,000 2,287,848
2017 6,460,000 1,886,998 8,346.998 6,460,000 1,886,998
2018 5,895,006 1,518,530 7,413,530 5,895,000 1,518,530
2019 _ 5,295,000 1J84,430 6,479,430 5,295,000 1,184.430
2020 4,865,009 ~ ~:.~?;~ 4.665.090 886.815
2021 ~ 3,995,000F 3,995,000 627,150
2022 ~0~00 408,750!'' 3,~93,~50~3.285,000i408,750
2023 2~0 ~;:;ool2:,69.160~ 2.535.000~2~,1~
2024 ~ 1.740000,105.900
2025 895,000 26,850 921,850 895,000 26,850
Parking Revenue Bonds
Debt Repayment by Fiscal Year
I TOTAL PRINCIPAL
I PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST PARKING PARKING BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 2,405,000 889,111 3,294, 111 2,405,000 889,111 15,960.000
2003 835,000 789.168 1,424,168 635,000 789,168 13,555,000
2004 665.000 747,725 1.412,725 665,000 747,725 12.920,000
2005 590,000 710,381 1,300.381 590.000 710,381 12,255,000
2006 620,000 677,344 1,297.344 620,000 677,344 11,665,000
2007 655.000 642,503 1,297,503 655,000 642,503 11,045,000
2008 355,000 605,594 960.594 355,000 605,5o~4 10,390,000
2009 370,000 584,298 954,298 370,000 584,298 10,035,000
2010 390.000 561,973 951,973 390,000 561,973 9,665,000
2011 410,00~ 538,473 946,473 410,000 538,473 9,275,000
2012 430,000 513,798 943,798 430,000 513,798 8,865,000
2013 455,000 487,801 942,801 455,000 487,801 8,435,000
2014 480,000 460,335 940,335 480,000 460,335 7,980,000
2015 505,000 431,401 ~_ 936,401 505.000 431,401 7.500,000
2016 535.000 400,851 935,851 535,000 400.851 6,995,000
2017 565,000 368,468 933,468 565,000 368,468 6,460,000
2018 600,000 334,100 934,100 600,000 334,100 5.895,000
2019 630,000 297,815 927,815 630,000 297,815 5,295,000
2020 670,000 259,465 929,465 670,000, 259,465 4,665,000
2021 710,000 218,400 928,400 710,000 218,400 3.995,000
2022 750,000 174,600 924,600 750,000 174,600 3,285,000
2023 795,000 128,250 923.250 795.000 128.250 2,535,000
2024 I 845,000 79,050 924,050 845,000 ~ 79,050 1,740,000
2025 L 895.000 26,850 921,850 895,000 26,850 895,000
Totals ~ 6/30101 15,960,000, 10,927,751, 26~887,751 '~5,966,000 10,927,751
1992 $1.19 Million Parking Revenue Bond Issue:
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-1 and 1-1.
This bond issue refunded the t986 Parking Revenue bonds. The 1986 bond issue paid for two additional
parking levels at the Dt~buqt~e Street parking ramp. Debt service is repaid from parking revenues.
TOTAL I PRINCIP~J_
PRiNCiPAL & ~ PAID FOR BY jj PAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS
2002 160.000 4,240 164,240 160,000 4,240 1
Totals ~ 613010t 160~000 4,240, 164~240~ 1601000 4~240
1992 $3.48 Million Capital Loan Note Bond Issue:
Principal payable 6-1; Interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
The bond issue paid for a new four level parking facility on the Chauncey Swan Parking lot. Debt service is repaid
from parking revenues.
TOTAL PRINCtPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL i INTEREST PARKING PARKING BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL ~ INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 245,000 85,938 330,938 ~ __ 85,938 1,680,000
2003 260,000 73,688 333,688 260,000 73,688 1,435,000
2004 270,000 60,688 330,688 60,688 1,17~
2005 285,000 46,918 331,918 46,918 90~
2006 300.000 32,240 332.240 300 000 32,240 620.000
2007 320,000 16,640 336,640 320',000 16.640 320.000
Totals @ 6/30/01 1,680~000~ 3t6,110 1,996,110, t,686~000 316~1101
1995 $2.5 Million Parking Revenue Bond Issue: ~
Principal payable 7-1; interest payable 12-1 and 6-1.
The bond issue refunded the 1985 Parking Revenue bonds. The 1985 bond issue provided the City with fund:
to defease the outstanding 1978 Parking Facility Revenue bonds. Debt service is repaid from parking
revenues.
TOTAL i PRINCIPAJ_
PRINCIPAL & PAJD FOR BY ! pAiD FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST PARKING PARKING BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES 'j REVENUES FISCAL YEAR_
2003 7 375.000 ' 43,058 418,058 43,058 770.0C~
2004 ~ 395,000 14,615 ~09,615 3~5,~0~ 14,615~ 395,000
I t27,466'
Totals @ 6/30101 1,120,000 127,466 t,247,466 1,120~000
1999 $1.65 Million Taxable Parking Revenue Bond Aniticipation Notes: Principal payable 12-14-01;
interest payable 12-14 and 6-14
This bond issue is paying for the construction of the commercial portion of the Tower Place parking
facility located on Iowa Avenue. Debt service is repaid from revenues from the sale of the
condominiums in the commercial portion of the parking facility.
'i ! I
[ TOTAL ~ PRINCIPAL
!, PRtNCIPAL& PAiD FOR BY p.adD FOR BY. BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST PARKING PARKING [BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES [ FISCAL YEAR
2002 1,650,000 56,719 1,706.719 1,650,000 56,719i 1,650,000
Totals @ 6/30101 1~650,000 56,719 t,706,719 t,650,000 56,719
1999 $11.35 Million Parking Revenue Bond Issue:
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 1-1 and 7-1.
This bond Issue is used to pay for the construction of the Tower Place parking facility located on Iowa
Avenue. Debt service is repaid from parking revenues.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST PARKING PARKING BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR_
2002 672.423 672.423 0 672.423 11,350.~
2003 672,423 672,423 0 672.423 11.350.0(~
_ 2004 ._ 0 672.423 672.423 0 " 672,423 11,350,0~
~ 2005 305,000 663.463 ___,968.463 305,000 663.463 11.350.0~
2006 320,000 645,104, 965,104 320,000 645,104 11,045,0~
2007 335,000 625,863 960,863 335,000 625,863 10,725,0~
2008 355,000 605,594 960,594 355,000 605.594 10,390,0~
2009 370.000 584.298 954,298 370,000 584.298 10.035.0~
2010 390.000 561.973 951.973 390,000 561.973 9,665.0~
2011 410.000 538.473 948.473 410,000 538,473 9,275.00~
2012 430.000 513.798 943.798 430.000 513,798 8.865,0~
2013 455,000 487.801 942.801 455.000 487.801 8,435.0~
2014 480.000 460,335 940,335 480,000 460.335 7.980.0~
2015 505.000 431,401 936.401 505.000 431,401 7,500.06~
2016 535.000 400.851 935.851 535,000 400.851 6.995,06~
2017 565,000 368,468 933,468 565,000 368,468 6,460.00~
2018 600.000 334.100 934.100 600,000 334,100 5.895.0~
2019 630,000 297.815 927.815 630.000 297.815 5,295,0~
2020 670,000 259,465 929,465 670,000 259,465 4,665.0~
2021 710.000 218,400 928,400 710,000 218,400 3.995,06~
2022 750.000 174.600 924,600 750,000 174,600 3,285,0(~
' 2 ~
_ 2023 795,000 128. 50 923,250 795,000 128.250 2,535,06~
2024 ,6.000 79.650 1.740.0
2025 895,000~_ ---~ ............ i _ 26.850 895,006
' I
Totals @ 6/30/01 11,350,000i 10,423,216~ 21,773,216 j 11,380,000~ 10,423,216!
Water Revenue Bonds
Outstanding Debt by Fiscal Year
PRINCIPAL INTEREST
BALANCE TO BALANCE TO
PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL BE PAID FOR BE PAID FOR
BALANCE BALANCE PRINCIPAL & BY BY
FISCAL BEGINNING OF BEGINNING OF INTEREST WATER FUND WATER FUND
YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES
2002 22,060.000 16,929,424 38,989.424 22050000 16.929,424
2003 21,355,000 15,754,152 37,109,152 21,355,000 15.754,152
2004 20,855.000 14,666,209 35,521,209 20855,000 14,666.209
2005 20,330,000 13.603,3~7 33.933.317 20,330.000 13,603,317
2006 19,780,000 12,566,699 32,346,699 19,780,000 12,566.699
2007 19,210,000 11,557,457 30,767,457 19,210.000 11,557,457
2008 18,610,000 10,576,808 29,186,808 18,610,000 10,576,808
2009 17,980,000 9,626,222 27,606,222 17,980.000 9,626,222
2010 17,325~00 8,707,048 26,032,048 17.325,000 8,707,048
2011 16,635,000 7,820,756 24,455,756 16.635.000 7,820,756
2012 15,915,000 6,968,932 22,863,932 15,915.000 6,968,932
2013 15,165.000 6,153,046 21,318,046 15.165,000 6,153,046
2014 14,375,000 5,375,094 19,750.094 14,375,000 5,375,094
2015 13.540,000 4,637,510 18,177,510 13,540,000 4,637,510
2016 12,665,000 3,942,688 16,607,688 12,665,000 3,942,688
2017 11.745,000 3,293,235 15,038,235 11,745,000 3.293,235
2018 10,780,000 2,692.111 13,472,111 10,780,000 2,692.111
2019 9,760,000 2,142,596 11,902,596 9,760,000 2142,596
2020 8,685,000 1,648.000 10.333,000 8685,000 1,648,000
2021 7,560000 1,211400 8?71400 7560000 1.211.400
2022 6370,000 836000 7205000 5370000 836,000
2023 5115,000 525703 5,640703 5115,000 525.703
2024 3.790,000 264,563 4074,563 3790,000 284,563
2025 2390,000 116,469 2,506469 2,390000 116,469
2026 910.000 25594 935.594 910000 25594
Water Revenue Bonds
Debt Repayment by Fiscal Year
t TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAiD FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST WATER FUND WATER FUND BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL yEAR
2002 705,000 1,175,272 1,880,272 705,000 1,175,272 22,060,000
2003 500,000 1,087.943 1,587,943 500,000 1,087,943 21,355,000
2004 525.000 1,062,893 1,587.893 525,000 1,082.893 20,855,000
2005 550,000 1,036,618 1,586,618 550,000 1,036,618 20,330,000
2006 570.000 1,009,243 1,579,243 570,000 1,009,243 19,780,000
2007 600.000 980,649 1,580.649 600,000 980,649 19,210,000
2008 630,000 950,586 1,580,586 630,000 950,586 18,610,000
2009 655,600 919,174 1,574,174 655,000 919,174 17,980,000
2010 690,000 886,293 1,576,293 690,000 886,293 17,325,000
2011 720,000 851,824 1,571,824 720,000 851,824 16,635,000
2012 750,000 815,886 1,565,886 750,000 815.886 15,915,0~0
2013 790,000 777,952 1,567,952 790,000 777.952 15,165,000
2014 835,000 737,584 1,572,584 835,000 737,584 14.375,000
2015 875.000 694.823 , 1,569,823 875,000 694,823 13,54_0.000
2016 920,000 649.453 1,569,453 920.000 649,453 12,665,000
2017 965,000 601,124 1,566,124 965.000 601,124 11,745,000
2018 1,020,000 549,515 1,569,515 i,020,000 549.515 10,780,000
2019 1,075,000 494,596 1,569,596 1,075,000 ~,94,595 9,760,000
2020 _ 1,125,000 436,600 1.561,600 1,125.000 436,600 8,685,000
2021 1,190,000 375,400 ~ 1,565,400 1,190,000 _, 375,400 7,560,000
2022 1.255,000 , 310,297 ~ 1.565,297 _ 1,255,000~ 310.297 r 6,370,000
2023 1,325,000 241,141 1,566,141 1,325.000 241,141 5,115,000
2024 1.,90.090 158.0 ! 1.868.0 , 158.0 3.7 0.900
2025 1,480.000 90,875 1,570,875 90.875 2,390,000
2026 910.000 25,594 935,594 :16:,::: 25,594 910,000
Totals @ 6/30101 22,060:000 t6,929,424 38~989,424 22~ , 16,929,424 ,
1999 $9.2 Million Water Revenue Bond Issue:
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-1 and 1
This bond issue is used to construct improvements to the City's water system. Debt service is repaid from..
wateF Fevenues.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST WATER FUND WATER FUND BEGINNING OI
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 215,000 436,719 651,719 215,000 436,719 9.060,000
2003 225,000 426,269 651,269 225,000 426,269 8,845,00~
2004 235,000 415,344 650,344 235,000 415,344 8,620,000
2005 245.000 403,944 648.944 245.000 403,944 8,385,000
2006 255,000 392,069 647,069 255,000 392,069 8,140,000
2007 270,000 379,600 649,600 270,000 379,600 7,885~00b
r~ 2008 280,000 366,538 646,538 280,000 366,538. 7,615,000
m 2009 290,000 353,000 643,000 290,000 353,000 7~3~,0~
2010 305,000 338,869 643.869 305,060 338,669 7,045.0~
2011 320.000 324,025 644.025 320,000 324.025. 6.740.000
2012 330,000 308,588 638,588 330,000 308,588 6.420,000
2013 345.000 292,556 637.556 345,000 292,556 6.090.000
2014 365,000 275,694 640,694 365.000 275,694 5,745,000
2015 380,000 257,905 637,905 380,000 257.905 5,380,000
2016 400.000 239,185 639,185 400,000 239.185 5,000,000
2017 415,000 219,418 634,418 415,000 219,418 4,600,000
2018 440,000 198,250 638,250 440.000 198250 4,185.000
2019 460000 175.750 635.750 460,000 175,750 3.745,000
2020 480,000 152,250 632,250 480,000 152,250 3.285,000
202t 505,000 127.625 632,625 505.000 127.625 2.805.000
2022 530,000 101,750 631.750 530000 101,750 2,300.000
2023 560,000 74,500 634,500 560,000 74,500 1.770.000
2024 590,000 45,750 635,750 590,000 45,750 1,210.000
2025 620,000 15,500 635,500 620.000 15.500 620,000
Totals@6130101 9,060,000 6,32t,095 15,38t,095 9,060,000 6,32t,095
2000 $13 Million Water Revenue Bond Issue: '
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-1 and 1-1.
This bond issue is used to construct improvements to the City's water system. Debt service is repaid from water
revenues. -'
TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAID PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST WATER FUND WATER FUND BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 490,000 738,553 1,228,553 490,000 738,553 13,000,0~
2003 275.000 661.674 936,674 275.000 661,674 12,510,000
2004 290.000 647.549 937.549 290,000 647,549 12,235,000
2005 305,000. 632,674 937,674 305,000 632.674 11,945,000
2006 315,000 617,174 932,174 315,000 617,174 11,640,000
2007 330,000 601,049 931.049 330,000 601,049 11,325,000
2008 350.000 584.049 934.049 350,000 584,049 10.995,000
2009 365,000 566.174 931174 365000 566,174 10.645,000
2010 385.000 547.424 932424 385,000 547424 10.280000
2011 400,000 527,799 927799 400,000 527799 9.895,000
201~ 420000 507.299 927299 420000 507299 9.495,000
2013 445000 485.396 930.396 445000 485,396 9075.000
2014 470,000 46t,890 931,890 470000 461.590 8.630,000
2015 495,000 436,918 931,918 495000 436.918 8,160.000
2016 520,000 410,268 930,268 520,000 410,268 7,665,000
2017 550,000 381,706 931,706 550,000 381,706 7,145,000
2018 580,000 351,265 931265 580,000 351,265 6,595,000
2019 615,000 318,846 933,846 615,000 318,846 6,015,000
2020 645,000 284,350 929.350 645,000 284,350 5,400,000
2021 685,000 247,775 932.775 685,000 247,775 4,755,000
2022 725,000 208,547 933,547 725,000 208,547 4,070,000
2023 765,000 166,641 931,641 765,000 166,641 3,345,000
2024 810,000 122,344 932,344 810,000 122,344 2,580,000
2025 860,000 75,375 935,375 860,000 75,375 1,770,000
2026 910,000 25,594 935,594 910,000 25~594 910,000
Totals@6130101 13,000,000 10,608,329 23,608,329 13,000,000 10,608,329
Water Revenue Debt Payments
Annual Cost per User
$93.95
$100.00
$80.00
$60.00 .... :.- .i _ ~ ~',~,~:I
":""' i.i
$20.00
$_ , '..'
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Principal and interest payments on revenue bond issues are financed by
water and sewer user fees. These graphs illustrate the average annual
cost per user for debt payments on water and sewer revenue bonds,
based on the City's fiscal year.
Sewer Revenue Debt Payments
Annual Cost per User
$400.00 $373.91
$350.00
$300.00
$250.00
$200.00
$150.00
$100.00
$50.00
$ ....
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
28-
Sewer Revenue Bonds
Outstanding Debt by Fiscal Year
r PRINCIPAL INTEREST
BALANCE TO BALANCE TO
PRINCIPAL INTEREST TOTAL BE PAID FOR BE PAiD FOR
BALANCE BALANCE PRINCIPAL & BY BY
FISCAL BEGINNING OF BEGINNING OF INTEREST : SEWER SEWER
YEAR FISCAL YEAR FISCAL YEAR PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES
2002 74,905,000 44,099,348 119,004,348 74,905,000 44,099,348
2003 71,900,000 39,863,336 111,763,336 __ 71,900,000 39,863,336
2004 68,840,000 35,952,160 104,792,160 68,840,000 35,952,160
2005 65,595,000 32,213,913 97,808,913 65,595,000 32,213,913
2006 62,200,000 28,658,131 90,858,131 62,200,000 28,658,131
2007 58,600,000 25,294,952 83,894,952 58,600,000 25,294,952
2008 S4,830,000 22,134,833 76,964,833 54,830,000 22,134,833
2009 50,810,000 19,191,251 70,001,251 50,810,000 19,191,251
2010 46,545,000 16,480,241 63,025,241 46,545,000 16,480,241
2011 42,040,000 14,016,453 56,056,453 42,040,000 14,016,453
2012 37,270,000 11,815,438 49,085,438 37,270,000 11,815,438
2013 32,215,000 9,894,211 42, 109,211 32,215,000 9,894,211
2014 26,885,000 8,270,179 35,155,179 26,885,000 8,270,179
2015 24,760,000 6,856,039 31,616,039 24,760,000 6,856,039
2016 22,515,000 5,559,311 28,074,311 22,515,000 5,559,311
2017 20,125,000 4,387,461 24,512,461 20,125,000 4,387,461
2018 17,615,000 3,348,007 20,963,007 17,615,000 3,348,007
2019 14,955,000 2,449,122 17,404,122 14,955.000 2,449,122
2020 12,170,000 1,698,972 13,868,972 12,170,000 1.698,972
2021 9,205,000 1,105,994 1 O, 310,994 9,205,000 1,105,994
2022 6,615,000 666,469 7,281,469 ~ 6,615,000 666,469
2023 3.890,000 375,925 4,265.92_5 I 3,890,000 ~ 375,925
2024 2,400,000 202.950 2,400.000! 202,9 0
2025 .... 1,645,000, ~_._712 ... ' a 1,645,000 ~ 91,712
2026 845,000i ~3,237~ 868,238~ 845,000 I 23,237
Sewer Revenue Bonds
Debt Repayment by Fiscal Year
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY INTEREST PAID BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST SEWER SEWER FOR BY OTHER BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 3.005,000 4,236,012 7.241,012 3,005.000 4,236.012 7,241.012 74,905,000
2003 3.060.000 3.911,176 6.971,176 3,060,000 3,911.176 6,971,176 71,900,000
2004 3,245,000 3,738,248 6.983,248 3,245,000 3,738.248 6.983.248 68,840,000
2005 3,395,000 3,555.782 6,950,782 3,395,000 3,555,782 6.950,782 65.595.000
2006 3,600,000 3.363,179 6.963,179 3,600,000 3,363.179 6,963,179 62,200.000
2007 3,770,000 3.160.119_ 6,930.119 3,770,000 3,160.119 6,930,119 58,600,000
2008 4,020,000 2.943,582 6,9~3,582 4,020.000 2,943,582 6,~63,582 54,830,000
2009 4.265,000 2,711,010 6,976,010 4,265,000 2.711.010 6,976,010 50,810,000
2010 4,505,000 2,463,788 6,968,788 4,505,000 2,463,788 6,968,788 46,545,000
2011 4,770,000 2,201,014 6,971,014 4.770.000 2,201,014 6,971,014 42,040,000
2012 5,055,000 1,921,227 6,976,227 5,055,000 ~ 1,921,227 6,976,227 37,270,000
2013 5,330,000 1,624,032 6,954,032 5,330,000 1,624,032 6.954,032 32,215,000
2014 2,125.000 1,414,140 3,539,140 2,125,000 1,414,140 3,539,140 26.885,000
2015 2,245.000 1,296,729 3,541,729 2,245,000 1,296,729 3,541,729 24,760,000
2016 2,390,000 1,171,850 3,561,850 2,390,000 1,171,850 3,561,850 22,515,000
2017 2.510,®01.639.4543,549,4542,510.000
1,039,4543,549.45420,125,000
2018 2,660.000 898.885 3,558.885 2.660,000 3.558.885 17,615,000
2019 2.785,000 750,150 3,535,150 2,785,000 3.535,150 14.955,000
2020 ._ 2,965.000 592.976 3,557,978 2,965.000 592,978 ~ 3,557.978 12.170.000
2621 2,596,000 439,525 3.029.525 2,590.060 3,029.526 9,205,600
2022 2,725,000 290,544 3.015.544 2,725.000 3,015,544 6,615,000
2023 1,490,000 _ _ 172,975 1,662,975 1.490,000 ~ , 172,975 I 1,662,975 3,890,000
2024 755,000 , 111,238 866,238 755,000 J 111.238 ] 866,238 2.400.000
2025 800,000 68,475 868.475 800.000 68.475 r 868,475 1,645.000
~, 2026 845,000 23.238 868,238 845.000 , 23,238! 868,238 845,000
Totals @ 6130101 74,9051000 44,0991348 119~004~348 ~ 74,905~000 44,0991348 [ 119,0041348
1993 $37.3 Million Sewer Revenue Bond Issue:
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-1 and 1-1.
This bond issue refunded the callable portion of the 1986 Sewer Revenue bonds, The 1986 bonds were issued to
construct a new wastewater facility. Debt service is repaid from wastewater revenues.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL PAID INTEREST PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & FOR BY pAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST SEWER SEWER BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 1,715,000 1,686,579 3,401,579 1,715,000 1,686,579 29,210,000
2003 1,630.000 1,583,088 3.413.086 1,830,000 1,583,088 27,495,000
2004 1.940,000 1.472,344 3,412.344 1,940,000 1.472,344 25,665!000
2005 2,045,000 1,355,284 3,400,284 2,045,000 1,355,284 23,725!000
2006 2,175,000 1.231,322 3,406,322 2,175,000 1,231,322 21.660_!000
2007 2,295,000 1,100,016 3.395,016 2.295,000 1,100,016 19.505~000
2008 2,440,000 959,400 3,399,400 2,440,000 959,400 17.210-t00C
2009 ! 2,610,000 807,900 3,417,900 _ 2,610,000 807,900 14,770!000
2010 2,770,000 646,500 3,416,500 2,770,000'r 646,500 12,160,00C
2011 2,950,000 __ 474,900 3,424,900 2,950,000 _' _474,900; 9.390_!00(:
2612 3.125.000 2~:,~5666 3.,17.650 ~ 2;~..~ 6.,0.00°
2613 i 3.315,600 3,41..4~0 LZ 3,315:ooc
Tot. Is ,~ 6,30,0~29.210.6061t1.709.432~40.919.432~!29.210.006i11.7,~.432i
1996 $18.3 Million Sewer Revenue Bond Issue:
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-1 and 1-1.
This bond issue is used to construct improvements to the City's sewer system. Debt service is repaid from
wastewater revenues.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL
PRINCIPAL PAID INTEREST
PRINCIPAL & FOR BY PAID FOR BY BALANCE
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS R S REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 450.000 930,888 1.380,888 450,000 930.888 17,000,000
2003 475,000 907.763 1,382,763 475,000 907.763 16,550,000
2004 500,000 883.388 1,383.388 500.000 883,388 16.075,000
2005 525,000 857,500 1.382,500 525,000 857,500 15,575,000
2006 550,000 830.088 1,380.088 550.000 830,088 15,050,000
2007 575.000 801,400 ~ 1,376,400 575,000 801,400 14.500,0~
2008 625,000 770,488 1.395,488 625,000 _ _ 770,488 13,925~
2009 650,000 737,013 1,387.013 i 650,000 ~ 737.013 13,300.0~
2010 675,000 701,563 ~ 1,376.563 ~ 675.000 r 701.563 12 650.000
2011 ~ 725,000 663,400 1,388,400 I 725,000 I 663,400 1%975,000
2012 775,000 621.763 1,396,763 775,000 621,763 11,250,000
2013 800,000 577.263 %377,263 800,000 ~_ 577.263 10,475,000
2014 850.000 530.238 1,380,238 ~ 850,000 ~ 530,238 9,675,000
2015 i 900.000 "480,_3_63~ 1.380,363 ! 900.000 I 480,363 8,825.000
2016_, 427,8381,377.638 50,000'427.6387,925,000
2017 1 ~3' 1,372,063'T1,000.000372,0636,975,000
2018 1.075,000" 312,656 1,387,656 1,075.000 312,656 5,975,0~'
2019 1.125,000 249.406 1.374,406 1,125,000 249.406 4.900,000
2020 1,200,000 182,563 1,382.563 1.200.000 182,583 3,775.000
2021 1.250.000 112, 125 1.362, 125 1,250,000 112, 125 2,575.000
2022 1.325,000 38,094 1,363.094 1.325,000 38,094 1.325,000
Totals @ 6130101 17,000,000 11,987,656 28,987,656 17,000,000 tl,987,656
1997 $10.6 Million Sewer Revenue Bond Issue:
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-I and 1-1.
This bond issue Is used to construct improvements to the City's sewer system. Debt service is repaid from -
wastewater revenues.
PRINCIPAL
: TOTAL PRINCIPAL INTEREST BALANCE
PRINCIPAL & PAID FOR BY PAID FOR BY BEGINNING
FISCAL INTEREST SEWER SEWER OF FISCAL
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES YEAR
2002 250,000 529,188 779,188 250,000 529,188 9.925,000
2003 250,000 516,313 ~ 766.313 250,000 516,313 9.675,000
~' 2004 275,000 , 502.794 ] 777,794 , 275,000 502,794 9,425,000
2005 275,000 488,631 i 763,631 275.000 ~_ 488.631 9,150,000
2006 300,000 473,825 773,825 300,000 ~ 473,825 8,875,000
2007 300,000 !" 458.375 ~ _ ' 758,375 300,000 458,375 8,575,000
2009 424,900 L 774,900 350,000 .... 424,900 7,950,000
2010 375,000 ~ 406,044 781,044 375,000 406,044 7,600,000
2011 375,000 386,169 761,169 375,000 386,169 7,225,000
2012 400,000 365,338 765,338 400,000 365,338 6,850,000
2013 ~ 425,000 342,956 767,956 425,000 342,956 6,450,000
2014 450,000 319,000 769,000 450,000 319,000 6,025,000
2015 475,000 293,563 768,563 475,000 293,563 5,575,000
2016 525,000 266,063 791,063 525,000 266,063 5,100,000
2017 550,000 236,500 786,500 550,000 236,500 4,575,000
2018 575,000 205,563 780,563 575,000 205,563 4,025,000
2019 600,000 173,250 773,250 600,000 173,250 3,450,000
2020 650,000 138,875 788,875 650,000 138,875 2,850,000
2021 700,000 101,750 801,750 700,000 101,750 2,200,000
2022 725,000 62,563 787,563 725,000 62,563 1,500,000
2023 775,000 21,313 796,313 775,000 21,313 775,000
Totals @ 6/30/01 9,925,000 7,155,250 17,080,250 9,925,000 7,155,250
1999 $7.0 Million Sewer Revenue Bond Issue: _
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-1 and 1-1.
This bond issue is used to construct improvements to the City's sewer system. Debt service is repaid from
wastewater reverlues.
TOTAL PRINCIPAL PAID INTEREST PR|NCIPAL
PRINCIPAL & FOR BY PAID FOR BY BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST SEWER SEWER BEGINNtNG OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
~ 2002 240,000 301,180 541.180 240,000 301,180 6,770,00(3
2003 290,768 0,768 250,000 290.768 6,530.00(:
~. 2004 279,930 539,930 260,000 279.930 6,280,00C
2005 270,000 268,668 538.668 270,000 268.668 6,020!00(3
2006 280,000 256.980 536,960 260,000 256,980 5,750!00C
co 2007 290,000 244,868 534,868 290,000 244,868 5,470,00C
2008 305.000 232,224 537,224 305,000 232,224 5.180!00(3
2009 315,000 219,049 534.049 315,000 219,049 4,675!00~
2010 330,000 205,343 535,343 330,000 205,343 4,560!00C
2011 345,000 190,913 535,913 345,000 190,913 4,230,00C
2012 360.000 175,575 535,575 360,000 175,575 3,885!00(3
2013 375,000 159,218 534.218 375,000 159,218 3,525!00(:
2014 390,000 141,810 531,810 390,000 141,810 3.150.00C
2015 410.000 123,205 533,205 410,000 123.205 2,760,00C
2016 430,000 103.358 533.358 430,000 103,358 2,350,00(:
2017 450,000 82,345 532,345 450,000 82,345 1,920.00(:
2018 470.000 60,148 530,148 470,000 60,148 1.470!00C
2019 490,000 36,806 526,806 490,000 36,806 1,006,00~
2020 510,000 12,431 522.431 510,000 12,431
Totals @ 6130/01 6,770,000 3,384,815 10,154,815 6,770,000 3,384,815
2000 $12.0 Million Sewer Revenue Bond Issue:
Principal payable 7-1; Interest payable 7-1 and 1-1.
This bond issue is used to construct improvements to the City's sewer system. Debt service is repaid
from wastewater revenues, -
PRINCIPAL & Y BALANCE
FISCAL INTEREST SEWER ;SEWER BEGINNING OF
YEAR PRINCIPAL INTEREST PAYMENTS REVENUES REVENUES FISCAL YEAR
2002 350,000] 788,178 1,138,178 ___ _ 350,000 788,178 12,000,000
2003 255,000! 613,246 866,246 255,000 613,246 11,650,000
2004 270,000', 599,793 869,793 270,000 599.793 11,395,000
2005 280.000 585,699 865.699 280,000 585,699 11,125.000
2006 295.000 570,964 865,964 295,000 570,964 10,845,000
2007 310.000 555,461 865,461 310,000 555,461 10,550,000
2008 325,000 539,189 864,189 325,000 539.189 10,240,000
2009 340,000 522,149 862,149 340.000 522.149 9,915.000
2010 355,000 504,339 859,339 355,000 504,339 9,575,000
2011 375,000 485,633 860.633 375,000 485,633 9.220,000
2012 395,000 465,902 860,902 395,000 465,902 8,845,000
2013 415,000 445,146 860,146 415.000 445,146 8,450,000
2014 435,000 423,093 858,093 435,000 423,093 8,035,000
2015 460,000 399,599 859,599 460,000 399,599 7,600,000
2016 485,000 374.793 859,793 485,000 374,793 7,140.000
2017 510,000 348,546 858,546 510,000 348,546 6,655,000
2018 540,000 320,519 860,519 540,000 320,519 6,145,000
2019 570,000 290,688 860,688 570,000 290,688 5,605,000
2020 605,000 259,109 864,109 605,000 259,109 5.035,000
2021 640,000 225,650 865,650 640,0001 225,650 4,430,000
2022 675,000 189,888 864,888 ~675,000 189,888 3,790,000
2023 715,000 151,663 866,663 715,000 151,663 3,115,000
2024 755,000: 111,238 866,238 ~ 111,238 ~ 2,400,000
2025 800,000~ 68,475 868,475 800,0001 ~ 1,645,000
2026 845,000[ 23,238~ 668,236 ! 845,00~ , ~ 845,000
Totals @ 6130/0t 12,000,000 9,862,195 21,862,195 12,000,000 9,862,195
FINAL ] I
MINUTES
DEER TASK FORCE MEETING
AUGUST 27, 2001
HARVAT HALL - CIVIC CENTER
MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Farrant, Harold Golf, Jan Ashman, Nancy Menning,
Lezlie Hail, Pete Sidwell
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Emerson, Linda Dykstra, Steve Hendrix
STAFF PRESENT: Lisa Mollenhauer, Ron Fort
OTHERS: Tim Thompson (DNR), Marti Horan
CALL TO ORDER
Farrant called the meeting to order at 6:45 P.M.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of July 30 approved as amended.
TIMELINE
Mollenhauer handed out a revised timeline for approval of the plan. Members decided to
work toward Council approving the Plan October 23 and submission to the Natural
Resource Commission at their November 8 meeting.
2001-2002 REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS
Farrant reminded the Task Force that Iowa City's Deer Management Plan was
extensively rewritten last year. Mollenhauer updated data obtain during 2000-2001,
Deer Task Force Description
· No changes.
Long-Term Deer Management Plan
· No changes.
Introduction
· Minor edits.
2001-2002 Deer Management Plan
· Added clarification to include the City will consult with a qualified professional to
evaluate feasibility of passageways (tunnels)
· Paragraph added regarding establishing a procedure to assess impact of
development on wildlife
Deer Task Force Meeting Minutes
August 27, 2001
Page 2
Determining the Number of Deer to be Killed in 2001-2002
· Minor edits to Summary of Population Surveys and Deer Count Conditions.
· Mollenhauer did hear from Larry Wilson (U of I) about the University participating
in a Task Force meeting to open dialogue. Wilson is to get back to her on who
will attend.
Recommended Number of Deer to Kill
· Still waiting for DNRrecommendation on number of deer to kill. Thompson
indicated Suchy would have it by the next meeting.
Summary of Population Management Options
· Minor edits. Goff noted that, according to current City Code, shotgun hunting
would be legal in the City without any Code amendments if shooting were
conducted under an approved Deer Management Plan.
· The Task Force decided to recommend White Buffalo, Inc. again as the agency.
Traffic Safety Issues
· No changes.
Education and Other Nonlethal Initiatives for Improved Human-Deer Coexistence
· Minor edits.
History of Deer Management in Iowa City - 1997-2001
· Minor edits. Goff raised the issue of the definition of "humane" from the 1997-
1998 description. Farrant reminded the Task Force that the definition of humane
listed was used by that Committee.
· Menning mentioned the need for citations. Farrant indicated specific references
were intentionally omitted to keep the document "friendly" rather than coming
across as a research paper. All support documentation is available with the
1997-1998 Management Plan. The cited information will most likely be updated
in the 2002-2003 Plan. At that time, reference citations will be added.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Marti Horan mentioned that autopsies should be necropsies. The Task Force thanked
her for her suggestion.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M.
Minutes submitted by Lisa Mollenhauer
FINAL
MINUTES
DEER TASK FORCE MEETING
SEPTEMBER 5, 2001
HARVAT HALL - CIVIC CENTER
MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Farrant, Harold Goff, Jan Ashman, Nancy Menning,
Lezlie Hall, Pete Sidwell
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Emerson, Linda Dykstra, Steve Hendrix
STAFF PRESENT: Lisa Mollenhauer, Ron Fort
OTHERS: Tim Thompson (DNR)
CALL TO ORDER
Farrant called the meeting to order at 6:45 P.M.
2001-2002 DEER MANAGEMENT REPORT
I ntroduction
· Minor edits.
2001-2002 Deer Management Plan
· Minor edits. Clarified the item on development to also include annexations.
· Rather than the City evaluating the effectiveness at a Formal City Council
meeting, it was determined the Task Force would evaluate the effectiveness
during the summer of 2002.
Determining the Number of Deer to be Killed in 2001-2002
· Minor edits to Summary of Population Surveys.
· Members decided to include the square mileage and number of deer per square
mile in the East Clear Creek zone (not on the chart but stated as a footnote).
Recommended Number of Deer to Kill
· Still waiting for DNR recommendation on number of deer to kill. Thompson
indicated Suchy would have it to the City in two days.
Summary of Population Management Options
· Minor edits. Menning raised the issue of removing the line under bow hunting
which states "The only scientific studies the Task Force found to review were
conducted by bow-hunting advocacy groups or funded by archery-related
Deer Task Force Meeting Minutes
September 5, 2001
Page 2
industries." Members decided to let the statement stand until studies not
conducted by bow-hunting advocacy groups or funded by archery-related
industries were found.
Traffic Safety Issues
· No changes.
Education and Other Nonlethal Initiatives for Improved Human-Deer Coexistence
· Minor edits.
History of Deer Management in Iowa City - 1997-2001
· Still need clarified numbers from the Salvation Army. Mollenhauer will continue
to pursue.
Commonly-Asked Questions
· Minor edits. The question regarding why isn't the Task Force recommending
bow hunting was amended to include an updated response.
ADJOUI~NMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
Minutes submitted by Lisa Mollenhauer
PRELIMINARY
MINUTES
DEER TASK FORCE MEETING
SEPTEMBER 10, 2001
HARVAT HALL - CIVIC CENTER
MEMBERS PRESENT: Pat Farrant, Harold Goff, Nancy Menning, Lezlie Hall, Pete
Sidwell, Steve Hendrix
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Emerson, Linda Dykstra, Jan Ashman
STAFF PRESENT: Lisa Mollenhauer
OTHERS: Tim Thompson (DNR), Marti Horan, Barb Goff, Casey
Wagner (Daily lowan)
CALL TO ORDER
Farrant called the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M,
RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Approve the 2001-2001 Deer Management Plan.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 27 and September 5 minutes were approved as amended.
2001-2002 DEER MANAGEMENT REPORT
Minor edits. Plan was approved as amended by a vote of 6-0 (Dykstra, Emerson,
Ashman absent).
EDUCATION AND NONLETHAL PROJECTS SUBCOMMITI'EES
Task Force members will submit volunteer interests to Mollenhauer.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 6:05 P.M.
Minutes submitted by Lisa Mollenhauer
Lindesmith Center for Drug Policy I 09-13-01 '~
Marian Karr IP16
From: Carol DeProsse [cdeprosse@earthlink. net]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:44 PM
To: jcnews@yahoogroups.com; iagp-johnsoncounty@yahoogroups.com; icprogs@yahoogroups.com
Cc: jpwhite@co.johnson.ia.us; cthompso@co.johnson.ia.us; mlehman@co.johnson.ia.us;
sstutsma@co.johnson.ia.us; pharney@co.johnson.ia.us; tneuzil@co.johnson.ia.us; tjneuzil@msn.com;
carolt@inav.net; Connie_Champion@iowa-city.org; Ross_Wilburn@iowa-city.org; Dee_Vanderhoef@iowa-
city.org; ipfab@avalon.net; Steve_Atkins@iowa-city.org; Eleanor_Dilkes@iowa=city.org; Marian_Karr@iowa-
city.org; Jim Fausett; Harry Herwig; John Weihe; Diana Lundell; Dave Jacoby; Jean Schnake
Subject: Lindesmith Center for Drug Policy
* Colorado and Noah Carolina Latest States to
Rethink Punitive Drug War *
Colorado and Noah Carolina are the latest states
to consider implementing Proposition 36 style
legislation in order to ease the financial burden
that comes with incarcerating large numbers of
non-violent drug offenders. Both states are
currently considering treatment over incarceration
alternatives. In Noah Carolina prosecutors are
under pressure from state lawmakers and
corrections officers to lighten up on sentencing.
State prisons are operating well over capacity in
Noah Carolina. Due to similar fiscal restraints,
Colorado Senator Ken Gordon (D) has put forth a
proposal that diveas non-violent drug offenders
into treatment instead of prison.
* Justice Department to Investigate Rainbow Farm
Shootings *
While the marijuana plant has never been shown to
cause an overdose death, marijuana prohibition has
proven deadly once again. An armed standoff at the
Rainbow Farm resulted in tragedy when FBI agents
shot owner Tom Crosslin on Monday and local police
gunned down roommate Rolland Rohn on Tuesday. A
third man, Brandon Peoples, suffered minor injuries
and has been told by FBI not to discuss details of
the standoff publicly. The standoff began after
Crosslin and Rohn skipped a court date for drug and
weapons charges.
http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/DailyNews/09 06 01rainbow_farm.html
* Governor Gary Johnson To Debate Drug
Enforcement Administration Head Asa
Hutchinson In New Mexico *
Governor Gary Johnson will debate the new head of
the federal Drug Enforcement Administration Asa
Hutchinson on the topic of drug policy. The debate,
9/6/01
Lindesmith Center for Drug Policy Page 2 of 2
"Directing America's Drug War: Which Way to a Safer
Society?" will be taped for broadcast on NPR's
Justice Talking this fall. Justice Talking is
broadcast on public radio stations nationwide and
on the Internet at www.justicetalking.org.
The Johnson/Hutchinson debate will take place on
Monday, September 10, 2001, at 4:00 PM at the
Continuing Education Conference Center (1634
University Boulevard, NE) in Albuquerque. It is
co-sponsored by KUNM Radio (89.9 FM), the
University of New Mexico School of Law, and the
National AIDS Brigade. The debate is free and
open to the public.
http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/pr-september06-01 x.html
* Drug Czar Confirmation Hearings Next Tuesday *
John Walter's confirmation hearing is set for
Tuesday, September 11, 2001. The Coalition for
Compassionate Leadership on Drug Policy (CCLDP),
a group of civil rights and public health
organizations, released a non-partisan report
today analyzing Walter's record. Visit their Web
site to learn more, and send a fax to your Senator
asking that they thoroughly question Walters and
scrutinize his record to ensure that he supports
reforms.
http://www.ccldp.org
9/6/01
AGENDA
Iowa City City Council
Economic Development Committee
Thursday, September 20
9:00 a,m,
Lobby Conference Room
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes of June 28, 2001
3. Presentation by Pete Vanderhoef Regarding the Local Iowa National Guard Unit
4. Discuss Ways to Market City's Economic Development Funds
5. Update - Business Outreach Program - Major Employer Visits
6. Review of Any Business Development Proposal Not Previously Listed on the Agenda
7. Other Business
8. Adjournment
Next Meeting
Thursday, October 18, 200f at 9:00 a.m.
MINUTES -CITY COUNCIL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2001 - 8:30 AM
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
ct to
------ ......
Members Present: Ernie Lehman, Dee Vanderhoef and Ross Wilburn"'
Members Absent: None
Staff Present: Steve Atkins, David Schoon, Ron O'Neil
Other Present: Allen Ellis, Rick Mascari, Tracy Overton, Steven Kanner, Irvin Pfab and
Sarah Langenberg
Call to Order
Mayor Lehman called the meeting to order at 8:35AM
Approval of Minutes of April 25, 2001
Minutes for the April 25th meeting were approved as submitted.
Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council Reqardinq Economic
Development Financial Assistance Proqram Descriptions and Eliqibilit¥ Guidelines
Schoon briefly summarized the item and stated that the Committee had discussed this item at a
previous Committee meeting. in response to a suggestion from Vanderhoef, the Committee
agreed to change the wording on the CDBG Economic Development Fund description on page
2, so that it would read "streetscape improvements" rather than "downtown streetscape
improvements".
In response to a question from Vanderhoef regarding the wording of the "Eligibility Guidelines"
section of the Commercial/Industrial Property Tax Exemption description sheet, Schoon stated
that the present qualifying areas (urban revitalization areas) have the same eligibility guidelines;
however, future urban revitalization areas may have different guidelines. If different types of
guidelines were established for new urban renewal areas, this description sheet would need to
change.
In response to a question from Vanderhoef regarding the "Low/Mod income Households" map
with the CDBG Economic Development Fund description sheet, Schoon stated that the 2000
Census income figures are not out by census tract, but once they are released an updated map
will be included. Until that time, the City will still use the 1990 Census information.
Lehman asked if the word retail under the "Eligibility Guidelines" section pertaining to the Partial
industrial Property Tax Exemption should be used. Schoon stated that the guidelines are taken
directly from the State codes.
Recommendation to Council:
MINUTES -CITY COUNCIL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2001 - 8:30 AM
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
Motion: Vanderhoef moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Economic
Development Financial Assistance Program Descriptions and Eligibility Guidelines.
Wilburn second the motion. Motion carried by a vote of 3-0.
Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council Re.qardincl Economic
Development Financial Assistance Proqram Application Forms.
Schoon stated this is the first time the Committee has discussed the application forms as a
group. Schoon stated that the Business Financial Assistance Application Form was modeled
after the State CEBA application form (Community Economic Betterment Accounts), but this
form reflects the requirements to meet the City's financial assistance guidelines. The other
application form, Economic Development Support Projects Application, is for projects that foster
economic development but are not directly tied to a specific business. The last two application
forms are examples for urban revitalization area property tax exemptions and the partial
industrial property tax exemption. Lehman stated that the Business Financial Assistance
Application form and the Economic Development Support Projects Application form could be
adjusted in the future if needed. Vanderhoef suggested that the forms could include a
statement that would read that the City might request additional information.
Recommendation to Council:
Motion: Wilburn moved to recommend to the City Council approval of the Economic
Development Financial Assistance Program Application Forms. Vanderhoef second the
motion. Motion carried by a vote of 3-0.
Consideration of a Recommendation to the City Council Reqardinq AnnualIV Settin.q
Aside a Percentacle of CDBG Funds for Economic Development Projects.
Schoon stated presently in the CITY STEPS Plan there is a target of 5% percent of the federal
dollars being made available for economic development activities. That percentage has recently
been reduced from 9% percent. There are two potential options, though they are not the only
available options. The first is to recommend to the Council that they set aside the 5% percent of
the federal funds given that is what is identified in CITY STEPS. The second option would be to
recommend a higher percentage. in recent discussions, the Committee discussed increasing it
back to 9%, which reflects what use to be in the City Step Plans.
Lehman stated that in eartier discussions it had been suggested to create a fund that could be
built up to a certain level and wondered if that could be possible with CDBG funds. Schoon
stated that when Steve Nasby was last at a Committee meeting this topic was discussed.
Nasby stated that only a certain percentage of federal dollars could be carried over from year to
year. Depending on the status of other projects awarded funds and how much would be
available in the economic development fund would impact how much could be carried over from
year to year. Lehman stated that if a meaningful contribution were to be made to someone who
needs economic assistance a larger sum many times would make it more appealing because of
the requirements of the program. Vanderhoef stated that too little funding could be a setup for
failure of the program. Vanderhoef indicated that she could support 10% of the federal funds
being set-aside for economic development projects.
MINUTES -CITY COUNCIL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
THURSDAY, JUNE 28, 2001 - 8:30 AM
CITY MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
Recommendation to Council:
Motion: Wilburn moved to recommend to the City Council that the City Council annually
set-aside 9% of federal funds for economic development projects. Vanderhoef second
the motion. Motion carried by a vote of 3-0.
Update - Business Outreach Proqram - Major Employer Visits.
Vanderhoef reported that she visited Goodwill and received some very positive feedback on
how the City has worked with them on the stoplight and crosswalk projects. Atkins stated that
many people did not have any knowledge that it was CDBG monies that helped in the
construction of the new Goodwill parking lot. Lehman stated that he would like a memo to the
Council in regards to the Chesapeake Display and Packaging Company and the positive
comments made by the plant manager of his working with City staff to get his building open and
the business operating,
Review of Any Business Development Proposal Not Previously Listed on the Aqenda
None.
Other Business
None.
Adjournment
Motion: To adjourn carried a vote of 3-0.