HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-04-16 CorrespondenceMarian Karr
From: Lisa Mollenhauer
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:23 PM
To: 'Linda A. Woltman@aramarksvm.com'; *City Council
Cc: Barb Coffey; Alana Vavra; Steve Atkins; Andy Matthews; Eleanor M. Dilkes; Gary Cohn
Subject: RE: web site
Ms. Woltman:
You are correct there are not many maps on the City's site. The site is still relatively new and, because map and directions
capabilities are available on other sites (such as mapquest http://www.mapquest.com), we have made a decision to focus
on information that is not available anywhere else. We too believe maps are important; therefore, we recently purchased
software to create maps and will work toward the goal of including many on the City's site.
Carver Hawkeye Arena is a University facility. I was able to locate a map for Carver Hawkeye on the University's Facility
Locator page at the following link http://www, uiowa.edu/~maps/c/chal .htm.
I hope you have an enjoyable time at the Pow-Wow. Thank you for relaying your concern.
Lisa
Lisa Mollenhauer
Administrative Assistant
to the City Manager
(319) 356-5010
..... Original Message .....
From: Linda A. Woltman@aramarksvm.com
[mailto: Linda_A._Woltman@aramarksvm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 12:09 PM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: web site
I don't understand why can't people in Iowa give proper directions to
newcomers to the area. I have been trying to get directions to
Carver-Hawkeye Arena for the past 2 weeks. I would like to attend the
Pow-Wow this weekend. I have been told its behind walgrens, well its not.
then I tried to get into your web site for Iowa City and get a map off of
there well no luck. I did find a phone number to call and for the last week
no one has answered the phone finally a got a young man who can't give
directions and if attends the university of Iowa I sure don't want my kids
going there. How do you expect to increase tourist spending in Iowa City
if no one can find it. None of the maps have the Arena on there. And
unfortunately I had to move here with a job transfer, 1 tell you this is
one Iousey experience I have had, from the move in to dealing with the
utilities out here. I would appreciate some help if someone in your office
can give directions to the Arena coming from 1st Ave in Coralville.
Linda Woltman
Marian Karr
From: Scott Kading [scottkading@mchsi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:37 PM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: 13 S. Linn St.
City Councir,
Again I would like to thank you for your time and effort you give to this groat city.
I am writing in follow-up to the City Council's decision to appeal the District Court's decision to allow a business to be in
the basement of our building at 13 S. Linn St. As you know, we originally filed our building permit application in July 2000.
Although both the State Board of Review and a District Court judge have ruled in our favor, I am still unable to use the
basement. It is my understanding that it could be another two years before the appeal is resolved. As you can imagine,
this process has become very expensive for me.
After consulting with my attorney, who has had discussions with the City Attorney's office, we are proposing that i be able
to proceed with my plans for a restaurant in the basement pending the outcome of the City's appeal. We would agree that
this would have no affect on the outcome of the City's appeal. We believe this would benefit everyone by allowing me to
proceed with the restaurant while allowing the City to maintain its position. It would also alrow the City to avoid issuing a
bond or any potential claims I may have.
If the City continues to prohibit me from going forward with my plans for a restaurant, I feel I will have no choice but to
instruct my attorney to file a lawsuit against the City.
Thank you,
Scott Kading
13 S. Linn St.
(319)430-0696
4/10/02
Marian Karr
From: Matthew Show [mapashow@mchsi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:06 PM
To: cou ncil@iowa-city.org
Subject: Question
Hi,
My name is Matt Show. I work for the Iowa City Community School District. I was just wondering, how come I make less money
working with the children of Iowa City then a clerk/typist of Iowa City or a water cust. service employee? I guess it just struck me as
odd since I am helping to shape the future of Iowa Cities youth. Thanks for your time.
Matthew Show
4/11/02
Council Member
410 E. Washington St, .~.~7 !~?~ -5 ~ill l~: ~!~
Iowa City, IA 52240
Dear Co~cil Members:
I m ~ting m you in tug,ds m ~e p~ ordin~ce ~at would require Iowa Ci~ residents m
obtain pemits for p~ies ~d keg p~ch~es, ~d would b~ indoor hmi~e ~om ~ont porches.
This proposal is absolmely asinine. I m grossly appMled that my elected ci~ co~cilo~ would
w~te their time discussing such a pro,sM that cle~ly ~mples on inffivid~l libe~ies. ~s
proposed ordin~ce mint be elimina~d in i~ entim~.
~e contention ~at by eliminming couches ~om ~ont porches will contribute to ~e upk~p of
Iowa Ci~ is outrageous. Upkeep of individual homes is solely le~ to ~e prope~ o~er, ~d
does not ne~ a m~date by the ci~ s~ting that a homeo~er c~ot have a couch on their
outside pomh. I'm s~e ~ Co,oil members you c~ find more impo~t ~d pressing issues
that face Iowa Ci~ residents th~ w~ting yo~ time discussing couches on home omers
pomhes.
The contention ~at a p~ pe~it wo~d i~ibit impromptu ga~efin~ is so ins~ely fidic~o~,
it is Mmost ~y. If you ~e ~der the n~ve ~smpfion ~at ~ ordin~ce is going to c~b the
numar of impromptu ga~efings you ~e grossly mis~en. Reqofing Iowa Ci~ residents m
obtMn a "p~ pemk" for more t~ 30 people is absolute stupidi~.
As elected city officios I m disgusted ~d asked ~at my ci~ leaders ~e w~ting time on
such trivial issues. I m embossed for ~e Ci~ of lowa Ci~ thru ~e co,oil members offs
tom ~e ~ussing such ~volous ordi~ces. This pro~sed ordin~ce needs to be dropped in
its entire~. I'm s~e the Co,oil c~ find more peffinem issues, which ~e mom relev~t to the
consti~ents of Iowa Ci~.
Sincerely,
Mike Post
100 B~ge Hall ~4432
Iowa Ci~, IA 52242
319-353-1700
michael-post~uiowa.edu
Marian Karr
From: flintstone27bam bam@yahoo.com
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:30 AM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: Response to Eye Sore correspondence
Hell-o Councilors,
Have been waiting patiently for a response to my
Mar.18th letter about the litter problem in Iowa City.
Would appreciate some feedback about my ideas.
Thankyou,
Fred VanAllen
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
ATLAS WORLD GRILL
April 10, 2002
Dear City Council Members
We are seeking a variance to allow our caf~ to remain open until 12:30 PM. The current
regulations require that we cease all activity at 10 PM, I was lucky enough to live in Boulder Co.,
New Orleans La. And I just got back from atdp to Italy. All of these places had a thdving
nighttime caf~ scene. Great conversation, coffee, and wine enjoyed responsibly by adults. I
believe the Atlas World Grill should be allowed this variance for the following reasons.
-Our Average Table "Turn' time is over one hour. Because of this we have to stop seating
the patio at 9 PM.
-AIIOVang the patio to remain open after 10 PM. would provide excellent post-Hancher and
post Riverside theatre dessert and after theatre cocktail location.
-We only allow persons over 21 into the establishment after 10 PM. So this will not
contribute to under-age drinking. We have one of the best records on this issue downtown. By
giving this variance you would be sending a message to the over and under bars in town that the
city will work with establishments that honor the intent of the alcohol ordinance as much as the
letter.
-We were and are great supporters of the Iowa Av. Project. It was one of the reasons we
chose our Ioca~on and decided to move here from Boulder Co, We have invested over $15, 000
on a beautiful hand made rot iron fence from solon artisan Matt Bernhouse, designer chairs
pumhased through Design Ranch a local business, and unique stainless steel tables which Kumi
Moms and the design review board approved "enthusiastically'. I believe our patio adds to the
beauty of our downtown, and allowing us to remain open the extra two hours would help us offset
the cost of the improvement.
127 IOWA AVE · IOWA CITY, IA · 52240
PHONE: (319) 341-7700 · FAX: (319) 341-6608
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: March 28, 2002
To: City Clerk
From: Beth Pfohl, JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner ~
Re: Item for April 16, 2002 City Council Meeting: Change nineteen parking meters in
the Recreation Center lot from 1 O-hour to 2-hour meter term
As directed by Title 9, Chapter 1, 3B of the City Code, this is to advise the City Council
of the following action.
Action:
Pursuant to Section 9-1-3A(17), the nineteen existing parking meters comprising the west
row of parking meters in the Recreation Center lot will be changed fi.om a meter term of
10 hours to a meter term o1'2 hours.
Comment:
This action is being taken at the request of the Parking Division. The intent is to move
the long-term parkers and permit holders away fi.om the Recreation Center and open up
short-term parking for Recreation Center users.
indexbc~memos\4-1 BP.doc
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 5, 2002
To: City Clerk
From: Beth Pfohl, JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner ~?/~'~
Re: Item for April 16, 2002 City Council Meeting: Installation of NO PARKING 2 AM - 6
AM signs
As directed by Title 9, Chapter 1, Section 3B of the City Code, this is to advise the City
Council of the following action.
Action:
Pursuant to Section 9-1-3A(10), NO PARKING 2 AM - 6 AM signs will be installed at the
following locations:
600 block of South Dubuque Street,
500 block of South Clinton Street,
10 block Harrison Street on the east and west sides,
10 block of North Clinton Street on the east side,
200 block of North Clinton Street on the east and west sides,
300 block of North Clinton Street on the east side,
400 block of North Clinton Street on the east and west sides,
500 block of North Clinton Street on the east and west sides,
500 block of Iowa Avenue on the nodh and south sides,
500 block of College Street on the south side, and
400 block of College Street on the south side.
Comment:
The 2 am - 6 am parking prohibition is maintained in all metered on-street parking areas
in the Central Business District and surrounding area. The purpose is to allow routine
maintenance to be performed by the Streets Division. Inconsistent signage of the
prohibition has created enforcement problems for the Police Department. This action will
establish consistent signage throughout the on-street metered area around the CBD.
jccogt p/mem/act-comm4-5~2.doc
Date: April 8, 2002
To: Iowa City Council
From: Hillary Sale, Chair, Neighborhood Housing Relations Task Force
Re: Update from Task Force
The Neighborhood Housing Relations Task Force was established and appointed in October of
2001, by the City Council. In that Resolution, Council directed the Task Force to fulfill the goal
of improving peaceful habitation in Iowa City neighborhoods by reviewing the existing housing
nuisance laws and policies designed to improve residential neighborhoods in Iowa City. The task
force has been meeting almost weekly since that time in an effort to reach consensus regarding
the recommendations it will be making to the City Council. The Task Force plans to hold a
public forum in late April to hear community feedback on its proposals and, shortly thereafter, to
present its recommendations and some proposed ordinances changes to the City Council this
summer.
The members of the Task Force are:
Mike Carberry, tenant representative
Ted Chambers, Chambers Agency
Sally Cline, small landlord representative
Ann Freerks, neighborhood representative
Jerry Hansen, neighborhood representative
Nick Klenske, University of Iowa Student Body President
Mike Newman, tenant representative
Larry Svaboda, rental property owner/manager
Anne Vespa, Heritage Property Management
Tim Walker, neighborhood representative
City Staff who have been meeting with the task force are:
Sue Dulek, City Attorney's Office
Capt. Matt Johnson, Police Department
Norm Cate and Doug Boothroy, Housing and Inspection Services
Marcia Klingaman, Neighborhood Services
The Neighborhood Housing Relations Task Force will be hold a "public forum" on Tuesday,
April 30 in Emma Harvat Hall of the Civic Center from 6:00 to 8:00 PM. The purpose of the
forum is to hear public comment on the draft recommendations. When a draft of the
recommendations is available, we will forward it to you as well.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 335.9225.
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr ~
From: David Schoon
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:34 AM
To: 'sjmurf(~attbi.com'
Cc: *City Council
Subject: RE: Jamba Juice Qustion?
Dear Stephen,
There presently is not a Jamba Juice in Iowa City or in Johnson County, and I cannot recall that there has ever been one
in the sixteen years I have lived here. Aisc, I do not know how far away the closest one is.
David Schoon
Economic Development Coordinator
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr
From: Lisa Mollenhauer
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:21 AM
To: 'Stephen Murphy'
Cc: *City Council; David Schoon
Subject: RE: Jamba Juice Qustion?
Mr. Murphy:
Thank you for sending your comments to the City Council. A copy of your email will be distributed to all seven Council
Members at the next work session, formal meeting, or no later than the next Thursday information packet. All
correspondence addressed to Council becomes a permanent public record.
I forwarded your email to David Schoon, the City's Economic Development Coordinator, for response. He should be
contacting you shortly.
Lisa
Lisa Mollenhauer
Administrative Assistant
to the City Manager
(319) 356-5010
..... Ori§i~al Message .....
From: Stephen Murphy [mailto:sjmur£~attbi,com]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 6:16 PM
To: council~iowa-city.org
Subject: Jamba Juice Qustion?
I am a student that lives in Moraga CA. I was wondering if there has ever been a Jambe Juice in your city. Or
about how far away is the closest one. Can you get to one easily? Thanx.
Please reply fast
-stephen
Page 1 of
Marian Karr 5/~ ~-/~)
From: Lisa Mollenhauer
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 8:27 AM
To: 'ncsteele'
Cc: *City Council; Kevin O'Malley
Subject: RE: Hickory Hill Improvement Costs
Mr. Steele:
Thank you for sending your comments to the City Council. A copy of your email will be distributed to all seven
Council Members at the next work session, formal meeting, or no later than the next Thursday information packet.
All correspondence addressed to Council becomes a permanent public record.
if you wish to communicate with Council Members immediately, please click here for additional contact options
http;//www,icgov, org/cityco unci!.htm.
I have forwarded your email to our Finance Director, Kevin O'Malley. He will respond to your specific questions
below.
Have a nice day.
Lisa
Lisa Mollenhauer
Administrative Assistant
to the City Manager
(319) 356-5010
l
From: ncsteele [ncsteele@netzero. net]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 10:08 AM
To: council@iowa-city.org
Subject: Hickory Hill Improvement Costs
Dear City Council,
I am writing in regards to the improvements being made in and around Hickory Hill Park. What I would like to know is the
costs associated with these projects.
· Hickory Hill Park
o Since the trail improvement project at the park is being done to bring the park into compliance with the
American Disabilities Act, is this being paid for with local or federal funds? If both, what is the breakdown
of costs to local and/or federal taxpayers?
o Will the Parks Department's budget be increased to pay for yearly maintenance of newly constructed trails?
If so, how much is proposed?
· Hick;o~, Hei[Ihts D_e_ye.!op__m_ept
o What is the proposed costs to taxpayers for road and services construction for the Hickory Heights
development? For example: sewer installation, road and sidewalk construction, storm water drainage.
Thank you,
Nate Steele
PO Box 2755
Iowa City, IA 52244
Page 1 of 2
Marian Karr
From: Lisa Mollenhauer
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:38 PM
To: *City Council
Subject: FVV: Park Improvement Costs
.... Original Message
From: Kevin O'Malley
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:34 PM
To: 'ncsteele'
Cc: Lisa Mollenhauar
Subject: RE: Park Improvement Costs
Dear Mr_ Steele,
I have inserted my answers after your questions.
.... Original Message .....
From: ecsteele [mailto:ncsteele~netzero.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 10:00 AM
To: kevin-omalley~iowa-clty.org
Subject: Park lmprovment Costs
Mr. O'Malley,
I am writing in regards to the improvements being made in and around Hickory Hill Park, What I would like to know
is the costs associated with these projects.
· Hickory Hill Park
o Since the trail improvement project at the park is being done to bdng the park into compliance with
the American Disabilities Act, is this being paid for with local or federal funds? If both, what is
the breakdown of costs to local and/or federal taxpayers? The improvements ara paid out of local
funds.
o Will the Parks Department's budget be increased to pay for yearly maintenance of newly constructed
trails? If so, how much is proposed? The following comment is from Terry Trueblood, Director of
Parks & Recreation.
o Kevin,
The answer is .... no, our budget is not being increased for the specific purpose of maintaining these
trails. VVhile the length ofthe trail system is being increased substantially, the surface being used will
not require as much maintenance as the old trails. As you know, we have been requesting additional
help for quite some time due to a number of factors, i.e. increased parkland, more trails, high
maintenance sports fields, etc., but because of the budget situation we haven't received funding for
extra help in the last few years.
Terry
· Hickory Heig_hts Development
o What is the proposed costs to taxpayers for road and services construction for the Hickory Heights
development? For example: sewer installation, road and sidewalk construction, storm water
drainage. Those costs are to be borne by the developer.
(If incorrectly addressed, please forward this to the proper personnel)
Thank you,
Nate Steele
Page 2 of 2
PO Box 2755
Iowa City, IA 52244
Regards,
Kevin O'Malley
Marian Karr
From: Ross Wilburn
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:08 PM
To: Marian Karr
Subject: FW: Public power initiative
..... Original Message .....
From: Jaques, Sandford [mailto:sandford-jaques@uiowa.edu]
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 10:38 AM
To: 'connie_charnpion@iowa-city.org'; 'ernie_lehman@iowa-city.org';
'mike_odon nell@iowa-city.org'; 'dee_vanderhoef@iowa-city.org';
'ross_wilbu rn @iowa-city.org'
Subject: Public power initiative
Hi,
I wanted to voice my support for the analysis of a public power
utility for Iowa City. From the information I received (from Public Power
initiative), some 130 municipalities in IOwa have public power, including
Ames, so it is clearly a viable alternative for a number of communities. It
also sounds possible that a public power provider may be able to save the
City some money, which we all like. Yes there will be significant up front
costs if a facility needs to be constructed, but it may prove worthwhile in
the Iongrun. Third, I would like to see the City investigate some
alternative energy sources, such as solar, or wind rather than the
traditional higher polluting coal and petroleum based sources. I hope that
you give this issue the consideration that it deserves.
Sincerely,
Sandford Jaques
Page 1 of 1
Marian Karr
From: Mary K. Mitchell [nlcity@inav.net]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:33 PM
To: Iowa City Council
Subject: Reception for Brian James
The North Liberty Commerce Committee and the Iowa City Area Chamber am hosting a welcome reception for our new
North Liberty City Administrator, Brian James, on Tuesday, April 16, 2002, from 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. at Rookies in North
Liberty.
We hope you can stop by and say hello.
cc: Steve Atkins
Dale Helling
4/12/02
The C. Everett
0
p Institute
To the Mayor, City Council and
City of Iowa City
Congratulations on the passage of a smokefree restaurant ordinance. You have shown
great leadership and vision. I understand that over the past several years you, and
members of your community, hav_,9, educated themselves on the adverse effects of
secondhand smoke. As you kno/v, smokefree ordinances not only eliminate the exposure
of patrons and workers to carcinogens and toxins, but they also chance social norms.
Prohibiting smoking in public places reduces initiation of tobacco use among children
and assists smokers who wish to quit.
This is an important public health issue and Iowa City, with a forward-looking
government and a health-conscious citizenry, has once again proven itself a leader. I
hope other communities in Iowa and elsewhere will follow your example.
Thank you for including me in your celebration today. I am honored to have played a
role in the genesis of this ordinance.
Hanover, New Hampshn'e 03755 . 862
Tel. 603.650-1450 Fax 603.650-1452
Helene R. Hembreike'~r~
3002 l~arkview Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa 52240
April 11, 2002
Dear Ernie Lehman and Members of the Iowa City Council~
I am enclosing a letter that appeared in the Press-Citizen yes-
terday, April 10th. This letter clearly illustrates our need for a
feasibility study for establishin~ a municipal electric utility
here in iowa City.
Please do not si~n a franchise agreement with Mid-American at
this time.
Please fund a feasibility study.
Please establish a citizen~ committee to conduct this feasibility
study.
Thankyou.
Respectfully,
Page ! lA · Editorial Board: · To contact us:
Michael Beck, president and publisher Opinion editor
D n wednesday, Belinda Stewart, managing editor Suzan Erem
April 10, 2002 Daniel W. Brown, market development director Phone: 337-3181
Tricla Birr, assignment editor E-mail: opinion@
Suzan Erem, opinion editor press-citizen.com
Cheryl L. Taylor, employment specialist Fax: 834-1053
Lucllle Hernandez Gregory, community member
Iowa City needs power study
The Iowa City Council host of others, The Public this matter.
will anon vote on whether to Power Initiative for Iowa Carol Spazia~][ we support a feasibility O~]i~e
sign a fi'anchise (contract) City is opposed to a contract study that would gather the
with Mid.~merican Energy extending beyond 2005. We Saul Mekies f~ and enable the city to · There's more online
Company. The company's propose that the city, joining make an inte[tigent decision at press-citizen.corn,
proposal is for a IS-yearcon- with other coramunifies in ( uest 0piti0. o. beha/f of all its residents including:
Lract. The city's staffsuggest- Iowa, conduct a feasibility and businesses.
ed compromise is for an study to assess wisely our We support a franchise · Aa archive of past
eight to 10-year contract, energy future, including the other utilities: water, cable, ex[ending only to the end of Press-Citizen editorials, at
In response to a hefty possibility of creating a telephone, and high-speed year 2005 because that is wwv.press-citizen.com/
electric r-a[e increase request- municipally-owned electric Interne[ access, while main- when the rate freeze will
ed by iVfid~erican a short utility. Municipally-owned taininglowratesandraaking expire, opinion/
while ago -- just after utilities in Muscat[ne and a net contribution to the city A fmncbzse goh~g beyond · A guide on how to
Berkshffe Hathaway led by Ames have not increased coffers. 2005 may t-mancially bind submit letters at
Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, and electric rates [o their cus* In light of the California Iowa City to MJdAmerican www. press-citizen.com/
other large investors put- tomerssince 1978 and 1979, energy crisis, the Enron well beyond that date. opini0n/letters.htm
chased the company -- the respectively, scandal and the need to use h~deed, even if the city opted
Iowa Utilities Board froze More than 2,000 public our energy resources wisely, in the rneanthnc for its own · A listing of 10wa
elec~c rates, but oldy until power systems inthe United it behooves lowa City to seri- ulility, MidAmerican might elected officials at
the end of 2005. The recent States, incind[ng 137 cities in ously study the possibility of well argue later that the two www. press-citizen.c0m/
MidAmetican request, for an Iowa, operate theirown elec- a raanlcipally4wned elec/ric projected power plants that 0pi~io~/0fficials.htm
increase in nateml gas rates, ttic utilities. It does not nec- utility, before signing a long- are now being co~structed
annommed only a few days essmiiy mean bu[ldix~g new terra contract. MidAmerican were planned with Io~va city's
after its cash purchase of plants. It does mema the city is amonopoly (albeit regulat- "native load" customers in establishing a nmnicipally-
W'fllian~-s Pipeline Company would be in a position to ed for now). This is another mind Tlie city's utility may be ovmed utklity wtil be eco-
is aJready mt indication of negotiate better terms with cause for concern: Our ener- charged for the "stranded nontically in the best interest
where electric rates wili go raany wholesale power sup- gy future may be at the whbn costs" resulting from tile of lowa City. Therefore, let's
~ffter 2005 when the state's pliers m~d set its own rehail of a hand£ul of investors. "lost" ct~stomer base not put the proverbial cart
protection expires Then, rates. This may even include There is notl~g wrong with Tlie couned shoukl con before the horse First, let's
MidAmerican will look aggtin negotiating with Buffett and Gates looking sider sppointmg a represen- allocate a sufficient mnount
Io local consumers to pay for MidAmericmt for wholesale out for theh- own interest, tative comnuttec to ~ssLst m of funds ~o conduct a lo.si-
the cost of its expanding prices but on equal looting, Similarly, there is noticing bmtgingtolighl ali Ihe issues bility study by qualified
monopnly as opposed to be[ag straight- wrong with Iowa City resi invnlved, ex~per~ Then, bo-~ed on that
Any proposal for a con- jacketed by a 10- to 15-year dents and businesses looking Involvement with other study, determine whether -~
tract beyond 2005 would agreement as being contem- out for their own, and potential beneficiaries of and for how long, il at all--
bind the city, its residents, plated now. Such negotiating preparmg inte~genfly fort he lower rotes such as other to extend blid2dnerican's
~md its businesses lo a con- strategies are employed very future, cities, school dLsthcts, rite uni- franchise with Iowa City.
lmct wSth rates that are, at successfully by cities like .~s a result, we made sev- versity, should be sought to Carol Spctzia~i and Sau!
best, unknourn. That makes Pdnes tu~d Mttscatme. In fact, eral recommendations to the aclfieve economies of scale Mr,~ i~'.~ .vt to.oho i*~ne*~ oJ
no sense. Muscatine extended such City Couned, and urge crew- Until we have more facts. Th~' ['id*lit f'tnv('* h~itiatitu'
Marian Karr
From: Alan Nagel [alan~nagel@uiowa.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:05 AM
To: cou ncil@iowa-city.org
Subject: P & Z request
P&Zmemo4-02.doc
Copy follows, imported below and attached, of our letter concerning the
Camp Cardinal Road area master planning discussion, and specifically the
question of the exact location of the division between Iowa City and
Coralville in the memorandum of agreement.
We respectfully request that Council understand the fact that our property
is located exactly in the position where it is as rational for it to remain
in Iowa City as to be ceded to Coralville, and thus favor our preferences.
Alan Nagel
335-0326, 354-3403
To: Karin Franklin
City of Iowa City
From: Alan and Kristin Nagel
1215 Camp Cardinal Road
Iowa City 52246
Date: April 12, 2002
Re.: Master Planning, Camp Cardinal Road area
No few years ago, then mayor Susan Horwitz visited with us about the
long-term planning for development on the west side of Iowa City. She
observed that some land in Iowa City would probably be yielded to
Coralville, for purposes of the convenience of development, with specific
reference to gravity drainage flow and the placement of waste water lines.
Because our property is located at the height of land on the Camp Cardinal
Road, we expressed a strong preference at that time to remain residents of
Iowa City, where we have been resident property owners since 1972.
In the past decade we have reasserted our preference to remain in Iowa City
repeatedly, to City Council members and city staff.
That preference remains strong, and we believe coherent with planning,
beginning with the 1967-8 long-term plan and extending to current specific
expectations for Iowa City.
We request that planning and administrative staff recognize this request
and the long-term planning on our part that has accompanied discussion over
recent years.
cc: S. Atkins, City Manager E. Lehman, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
To: City Council of Iowa City
From: Julie Spears, Graduate Student, School of Social Work, University of Iowa
Date: April 15, 2002
RE: Iowa City Commissions and the Student-aged Population
Purpose
The purpose of this memo is to present the results of an assessment of the
representation of Iowa City residents on local commissions based on age. This assessment
focuses on the inter-organizational network of these community decision-making groups
and the student-aged population in Iowa City. The primary assumption is that students in
Iowa City represent an age group that is systematically excluded from civic participation,
intentionally or otherwise, in terms of the Boards, Committees and Commissions set up to
serve them as residents of their community. For the purposes of this assessment, the
student-aged population is defined as residents of Iowa City between the ages of 18 and 24
years old. The Boards, Commissions and Committees that make recommendations to the
City Council comprise the community decision-making groups (For a list of respondents, see
Appendix A).
This assessment attempts to:
1. Estimate the extent to which the student-aged population is present as a voice on
Iowa City Commissions;
2. Assess the willingness of these commissions to increase student input and civic
participation; and
3. Make recommendations for both the students and city in order to improve the
relationship between and representation of 18 to 24 year old on Commissions.
The goal of this assessment is to provide the student body, via the University of Iowa
Student Government (UISG), will a tool to support its current initiative to increase the
voice of the student-aged population in the Iowa City community through its work with the
City Council. This memo will present demographic information about the student-aged
population and city commissions, report the findings of the assessment, and make
recommendations based on the results.
Background: Iowa City's Student-aged Population and Local Commissions
Table 1 shows that 69 percent (or 19,714) of University of Iowa students are between
the ages of 18 to 24 years old (UI Office of the Registrar, 2001). Almost three-quarters of
students enrolled at the University of Iowa live in Iowa City (UI Office of the Registrar,
2001). In fact, of those who live in Iowa City, almost three out of four hve off-campus in
housing throughout the Iowa City community (see Table 1). The demographics of Iowa City
corroborate this figure in that 20,408 residents of Iowa City, about one-tI~ird o£
popu]ation, were between the ages of 18 to 24 in 2000 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2000). This
significantly over-represents this age category as compared to just over 10 percent of the
population of the state of Iowa as a whole being between 18 to 24 years old.
Table 1. , Students and Iowa e Age
Students Aged 18 to 24 19,714 69%
Of Students Living in Iowa City:
On-campus 5,675 27%
Off-campus 15,406 73%
Living in Iowa City 21,801 73%
_towa City Residents Aged 18 to 24 20, 408 33%
Source: UI Office of the Registrar, 2001 and U.S. Census Bureau, 2000.
Appendix A lists the 18 Boards, Commissions, and Committees under the direction of the
City Council as well as thc number of members and the length of the term for which a
member is appointed. A check mark indicates the Commissions with which I interviewed
as part of this assessment. I included the Neighborhood Housing Relations Task Force Ad
Hoc Committee. This Task Force was designed to address various issues, e.g. enacting a
noise ordinance, that would directly effect the student-aged population. To tailor to the
objective of this study, I excluded four commissions: Airport Zoning Board of Adjustment,
Airport Zoning Commission, Board of Appeals, and Board of Re¼ew based on the larger
number of specified requirements of members, e.g. licensed electrician or appointment on
another board. This resulted in a total study population of 15 Boards, Commissions, and
Committees.
Methods
To assess representation by age on these commissions, I conducted a telephone
interview of a convenience sample of city commissioners on March 23-24, 2002. The survey
included both quantitative and qualitative research questions regarding composition of the
board based on age and student status, as well as the affect that the board's policies and
recommendations have on students, and general attitudes towards the students' role in
their board (see Appendix D). Out of the 15 potential commissions that I identified for
inclusion in the assessment, a total of 10 interviews (n=10) were conducted indicating a
66% response rate. The full report (available upon request) contains results from the more
in-depth interview that I conducted with UISG president Nick Klenske, as both a member
of the Neighborhood Housing Relations Task Force and as a key informant regarding the
initiative to increase the student presence on city commissions. The results are presented
below.
Results
This section reports the aggregated survey results. Table 3 shows that only one
member of any board or commission is 18 to 24 years old. It is important to note that this
person is Nick Klenske in his role as student representative on the Neighborhood Housing
Relations Task Force, which is an Ad Hoc Committee. I~ other wo~ds, the are no members
of ~ny permanent Iowt~ C/tX Bo~'ds, Commissions, a~d Oommittee~ t]~at represez~t the 18 to
24 yea~ old age group. At the same time, four of the commissions reported having at least
one member who is a student at the University of Iowa or Kirkwood. Anecdotally speaking,
these members tend to be graduate students between 25 and 35 years old. Most
respondents (70%) reported a representative population of older adults (65 or older) on their
board. However, only three respondents (those with members who are students) stated
that their committee was reflective of the greater Iowa City community in terms of younger
adults. The same three respondents also expressed that they feel that students should
have a role on their board and that they ~vould be willing to actively recruit 18 to 24 year
olds for their board (see Table 2).
To assess civic participation, respondents were asked to agree or disagree with the
following stateinent: Student invoIvenmnt in lC Boards and Commissions would foster
community leadership and civic participation (such as, voting, attending council meetings,
etc.) anmngst the student population. Half (50%) of the respondents stated that they
agreed with the statement, although many respondents found this question difficult to
answer. Notably, 90 percent of the respondents stated that s/he would prefer a regular
voting member who happened to be a student as a member of their board to a non-voting
studeot representative.
% Member(s) of your committee aged 18-24 years old 10% 1
% Member(s) of your committee students 40% 4
% Committee reflects the greater IC community in
terms of age, including older and younger adults
Older adults 7 0 % 7
Youn~,.er adults ...... 30% 3
% Agree with this statement:
Student involvement in low~ City I3o,~rds and
Corn mission, s we u]d los tcr corn m t u~it)' lea dership an d 50 % 5
civic participa tion (such as, voting, ntte~ding cotmci]
meetings, etc.) amonffst _t]~e studemt i)opu]ation.
% Feel that studen~ shouldhave a role on committee 30% 3
% Prefer a re.ar voting member to a non-verst 90% 9
student representative
% ~ that committee wo~d be w~ng to actively 30% 3
recr~t to include a student-aged member
Table 3 presents the results of a question regarding the degree to which the board has a
perceived effect on student population in terms of the policies and recommendations to the
City Conncil. Tbe majority of the respondents (60%) felt that their board's
recommendations have a miniinal effect on the student population (see Table 3). Not
surprisingly, two of the three respondents stating that their board's recommendations have
at least a moderate effect on students are from the same three commissions whose members
reflect the greater Iowa City community. Tbougb none felt their board's recommendations
have ~l large degree of effect on the student population, oaly one respondent felt it bad no
effect (see Table 3).
Table 3. ~egree oi enecr oI ~OnCleS ana recommenc~arlons on students
Large degree 0% 0
Moderate degree 30% 3
Minimal degree 60% 6
No affect 10% 1
Open-ended comments are presented as qualitative research included in this assessnmnt
(see Appendices B and C). These statements, in my opinion, speak for themselves in
regards of the wide range of feelings from the board members towards the student-aged
population.
Conclusions
Iowa City Boards, Commissions and Committees as well as the City Council lack
diversity in representation of the Iowa City community in terms of age. No members of any
permanent Iowa City Boards, Commissions, and Committees represent the 18 to 24 year
old age group. Although some degree of representation of older adults exists on these
commissions, the population of 18 to 24 year olds is, in no uncertain terms, grossly under-
represented. This is particularly astonishing when considering that 33 percent of the
residents of Iowa City (20,408 people) are between the ages of 18 to 24 years old.
Overall, the three commissions that responded as having 1) members who are students,
and 2) a board that reflects the Iowa City community in terms of age, were the same
respondents ~vho felt that a) students should have an active role on their board, that b) this
type of role fosters community leadership and citizen participation, and that c) they would
be willing to recruit 18 to 24 year olds to their board. Concurrently, there appears to be a
sharp contrast to the unwillingness to be inclusive amongst the remaining respondents and
their commissions. The attitude of inclusivity toward youth participation displayed by the
previously discussed commissions, represents, a model for the rest of the community in
terms of cultural competency.
One of the most fascinating findings was the 90 percent support for a regular voting
board member who happened to be a student to a non-voting student representative. In
fact, several respondents stated that a non-voting member would be excluded from a
nmjority of the commissions' business that occurs in closed session for confidentiality.
Although a recent Council-Student initiative to create non-voting student representatives
went unsupported by City Council, I believe that the ultimate dismissal of this initiative is
a blessing in disguise for the long-term goal of increased student involvement. Non-voting
membership would only give students a less legitimate or tokenized voice in local decision-
making. Instead, I believe (as well as 9 other board members) that all board members
should be voting board members, and, I would add that I did not see this response pattern
as a way for commissions to effectively dodge potential student membership. This action
may have also created a damaging practice of treating students as a special interest
group. Certainly, it should be noted that as 33 percent of the population, students
labeled as a special interest group are no more that than any one neighborhood
association.
Lastly, on a refreshing note, respondents generally expressed a desire to increase their
inclusiveness of the student-aged population, so long as students have an interest and can
meet the time commitment. Term length could be a problem, however, not one that could
not be overcome (see recommendations). Of course, the owness to participate in democracy
falls finally on each individual be they black, white, old, young, rich, poor, and so on.
However, I believe that, as a community, we must continuously examine ways in which
certain groups are intentionally or unintentionally excluded from the process. The City of
Iowa City would be wise to conduct a similar assessment on the extending the subject of
this research to ensure that all residents of Iowa City have a voice.
Recommendations to Improve Age Representation on Commissions
This last section offers summary recommendations and strategies for improving the
relationship of Iowa City, its local commissions, and the student-aged population.
1) Follow Model Comm~asions. Three commissions appropriately described themselves
as representative of the Iowa City community on the basis of age. City Council can
use these commissions as a model from which to appoint future board members to
upcoming vacancies. Also, members of these commissions could submit an open
letter to the other commissions and City Council outlining the benefits of having a
diverse representation on their board. For the purposes of confidentiahty, I will
disclose the identity of these commissions upon City Council's request and proper
permission from the respondents.
2) Students should be actively recruited as reg~l~ voting members. Commissions
should sufficiently represent the age distribution of the general population.
Therefore, steps should be taken to ensure that that occurs.
3) The length of the term of appointment shoald be altered. If City Council changes
one seat on each board to a one or two year term (e.g. the Public Art Advisory
Committee) that will reasonably allow students to serve on local commissions. This
modification will address the concern of turnover in the student population while
building a healthier relationship between the two divided communities. Councilors
Kanner and Vanderhoef should continue to work with UISG to increase student
representation on local commissions while encouraging support from the remaining
members of the Council for this kind of policy change.
4) Send a Mass E-mail. The City of Iowa City should send a welcoming e-mail through
the mass e-mail system to students once a semester about the www.icgov.org web
page and other city services. At this time, reference could be made to the current
and upcoming vacancies on boards and commissions. Because, there are only a
couple of vacancies at any time, a mass e-mail would be looking to recruit 5-10
candidates out of approximately 20,000 Iowa City student residents. Another
appropriate student organization, e.g., UISG, Students for Local Politics, etc., could
also do this ff the City is disinclined.
5) Create a City'Student partnership. Both the outgoing and incoming student
government are notably committed to increasing student involvement in local
decision making. Engage stakeholders representing all the members of the Iowa
City community. Build a partner-based coalition of police officers, city staff,
university administration, and general Iowa City community members, in addition
to students (more than just one), board members and city council.
6) Enfranchiee the Iowa City population of 18 to 24 year olds. Voting is a most basic
form of civic participation. The recently elected UISG Vice President, Matt Blizek,
was also the founder of the Students for Local Politics student organization.
Members of this group have actively supported and promoted student involvement
and civic participation through voter registration, advocacy and awareness
campaigns, involvement in student government, and even running a student for City
Council in November 2001 elections. This an other appropriate student
organizations should be critical partners in the development of healthy City-Student
relationship. Student organizations and City of Iowa City should forge a partnership
driven "get out the vote" campaign to enfranchise the Iowa City population of 18 to
24 year olds. Voter registration drives would let students know that they are
residents and that they should register to vote where they live.
7) Continue to attempt to build support to elect a student to City Council (ideany an 18
to 24 year old).
I am personally committed to assisting the City of Iowa City in efforts to represent and
enfranchise its population of 18 to 24 year olds. In my communications with the UI
Student Government, I see a commendable and unprecedented willingness to work with the
city to build a better community for us all. Now is the time to capitalize on these precious
resources and improve the relationship between the city and its student-aged population.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions about this memo or the full report. I
may be reached at (319) 354'6589 or Julie-spears~uiowa.edu.
6
Appendix A. List of Interviewed Iowa City Boards, Commissions, and Committees
/ Adjustment, Board of 5 5
Airport Commission 5 6
Aninml Care and Adoption Center Advisory Board 5 3
· / Civil Service Commission 3 4
/ Itistoric Preservation Commission 11 3
,/ Housing and Community Development Commission 9 3
,z Human Rights Commission 9 3
· / Library Trustees, Board of 9 6
· / Parks and Recreation Commission 9 4
~ Planning and Zoning Commission 7 5
~ Police Citizens Review Board 5 2
Public Art Advisory Committee 7 (5)
Senior Center Commission 9 3
Telecommunications Commission 5 3
Ad ttoc:
¢' Neighborhood ltousing Relations Task Force 9 n/a
Excluded on the basis of special appointments:
Airport Zoniug Beard of Adjustnmnt
Airport Zoning Commission 5 (1) 5
Appeals, Board of 5 (1) 6
Review, Board of 7 (2) 5
5 (3) 6
Source: Iowa City Government Webpage. l_nttp://;vww.icgov.org/heards.btm#18
)endix B. ~uestions
· Ihave noidea.
· I don't know.
· Icould care less,
· I think they'd be agreeable to it.
· Ithink they'dbe veryinterested.
· I think they'd ha ye a positive response.
· I think the majority [of students] don't think about it.
· Depends on who you talk to.
)en-ended Comments
· In response to should a student to have a role on this committee:
>> I just don't see the benefit to the students or the community.
>> It's not necessary.
· In response to committee reflecting greater Iowa City community in terms
of age, including younger and older adults:
>> No. I don't think it's relevant.
· In response to degree of effect on students:
>>Our board affects the city as a whole, which is inter-connected
with the Universit , Students are
· lowa City is such a diverse town. The boards shouId reflect that based on
all caterer]es of diversity.
· I don't think students care about the community.
· We have a hard time fillin~ these boards, in part because of the length of
the terms.
· I don't think that students are ]nterested" they)'e not property owners. [At
the same time,] I wouId ha ye nothing against it ifa student bad the
background and an interest to serve.
Anyone ~s eH~bIe to app]y for a commission. But, peopIe that wouJd get
involved tend to be cite-minded. We just don't have high visibility.
Student involvement is great, We ~e aIways acfveIy recruiting.
We'veneverrecruitedata]~ butifastudentwereinterested, theyshou]d
be considered.
Accessi~TJty of aH Iowa City residents is one of our main pHozfties. We'd be
happy to have a student.
Students are a major portion of our community. We have a good mix of
cider and younffez' members and make use of student input in many ways.
. I think we a]so need more students going to meetings and active Daily
lowan reporting of meetings. That might be more efibcfive.
~studerts want to become active, ~e interested, have the time, ~d ~e
voting residents of Iow~ Cit~ [then they shodd apply]
8
Cultural Competency Assessment:
Iowa City Boards, Commissions and Committees & the student-aged population
Telephone Interview
Hello. May I speak to . Hi, my name is Julie Spears. I am a graduate
student in Social Work and Urban Planning at the university. I'm calling today to talk to you as
the chair/a member of the board/committee/commission. I was
wondering if you had a few minutes for a brief telephone interview about your committee and the
role of the student population of Iowa City. Yes. Great.
I am doing an assessment of the relationship of the boards and commissions in Iowa City with the
students or the student-aged population, that is Iowa City residents between the ages of 18-24.
So, the questions will pertain to that. And, any information you share with me is strictly voluntary
and confidential, You're information will not be indentifiable in the report.
1) Are any members of your committee 18-24 years old?
2) Are any members of your committee students at the University or Kirkwood?
3) Would you say that your committee reflects the greater lC community in terms
of age, including older and younger adults?
4) To what degree do you think the policies and recommendations made by your
committee affect the student population?
Large degree---moderate degree--minimal degree -no affect
4 ............... 3- 2. --1
Comments:
5) What do you think the younger residents of Iowa City would say about the
manner in which your committee serves and/or affects them?
6) Do you agree or disagree with this statement:
Student involvement in lC Boards and Commissions would foster community
leadership and civic participation (such as, voting, attending council meetings,
etc.) amongst the student population.
Agree Disagree
7) Do you feel that students should have a role on your committee?
If so, what role? How? If not, why not?
8) Do you think that your committee would be willing to make a commitment to
include a student representative? If so, how & why? If not, why?
Ok. That's the end of the survey. Any questions? Thank you very much for your time, Have a great day!