The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2010-10-20 Correspondence7 ~~5 //~ JOHNSON COUNTY (OUTSIDE IOWA CITY) 2009 assessed rollback taxable $ 2010 assessed % increase rollback tax able $ w/2009 rollback res $ 3,909,225,002.00 0.469094 $ 1,833,793,993.09 $ 4,039,517,204.00 3.2% 0.48529 $ 1,960,337,303.93 $ 1,894,913,283.29 comm $ 1,102,583,422.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,102,583,422.00 $ 1,104,777,072.00 0.2% 1 $ 1,104,777,072.00 $ 1,104,777,072.00 ag $ 330,137,151.00 0.662715 $ 218,786,842.02 $ 330,137,151.00 0.0% 0.69 $ 227,794,634.19 $ 218,786,842.02 ag dwel $ 175,771,100.00 0.469094 $ 82,453,168.38 $ 179,011,800.00 1.8% 0.48529 $ 86,872,636.42 $ 83,973,361.31 $ 3,237,617,425.50 $ 3,379,781,646.54 $ 3,302,450,558.63 201 0 taxable increase over 2009 4.21 $ 77,331,087.91 Is attributable to rollback change $ 64,833,133.13 Is actual growth 1.92 2009 assessed rollback taxable $ 2010 assessed % increase rollback tax able $ w/2009 rollback res $ 3,909,225,002.00 0.469094 $ 1,833,793,993.09 $ 4,039,517,204.00 3.2% 0.48529 $ 1,960,337,303.93 $ 1,894,913,283.29 comm $ 1,102,583,422.00 -$ 1.00 $ 1,102,583,422.00 $ 1,104,777,072.00 0.2% 1 $ 1,104,777,072.00 $ 1,104,777,072.00 ag dwel $ 175,771,100.00 0.469094 $ 82,453,168.38 $ 179,011,800.00 1.8% 0.48529 $ 86,872,636.42 $ 83,973,361.31 $ 3,018,830,583.47 $ 3,151,987,012.35 $ 3,083,663,716.60 2010 taxable increase over 2009 4.22% $ 68,323,295.75 Is attributable to rollback change $ 64,833,133.13 Is actual growth 2.06% IOWA CITY 2009 assessed rollback taxable $ 2010 assessed % increase rollback taxable $ w/2009 rollback res $ 3,124,020,860.00 0.469094 $ 1,465,459,441.30 $ 3,182,677,000.00 1.8% 0.48529 $ 1,544,521,321.33 $ 1,492,974,684.64 comm $ 1,170,461,470.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,170,461,470.00 $ 1,170,960,470.00 0.0% 1 $ 1,170,960,470.00 $ 1,170,960,470.00 ag $ 2,382,167.00 0.662715 $ 1,578,697.80 $ 2,317,426.00 -2.8% 0.69 $ 1,599,023.94 $ 1,535,792.97 ag dwel $ 1,256,350.00 0.469094 $ 589,346.25 $ 1,256,350.00 0.0% 0.48529 $ 609,694.09 $ 589,346.25 industrial $ 81,979,330.00 $ 1.00 $ 81,979,330.00 $ 81,786,730.00 -0.2% 1 $ 81,786,730.00 $ 81,786,730.00 $ 2,720,068,285.35 $ 2,799,477,239.36 $ 2,747,847,023.86 2010 taxable increase over 2009 2.84% $ 51,630,215.51 Is attributable to rollback change $ 27,778,738.51 Is actual growth 0.99% 2009 assessed rollback taxable $ 2010 assessed % increase rollback taxable $ w/2009 rollback res $ 3,124,020,860.00 0.469094 $ 1,465,459,441.30 $ 3,182,677,000.00 1.8% 0.48529 $ 1,544,521,321.33 $ 1,492,974,684.64 comm $ 1,170,461,470.00 $ 1.00 $ 1,170,461,470.00 $ 1,170,960,470.00 0.0% 1 $ 1,170,960,470.00 $ 1,170,960,470.00 ag dwel $ 1,256,350.00 0.469094 $ 589,346.25 $ 1,256,350.00 0.0% 0.48529 $ 609,694.09 $ 589,346.25 industrial $ 81,979,330.00 $ 1.00 $ 81,979,330.00 $ 81,786,730.00 -0.2% 1 $ 81,786,730.00 $ 81,786,730.00 $ 2,718,489,587.55 $ 2,797,878,215.42 $ 2,746,311,230.88 2010 taxable increase over 2009 2.84 $ 51,566,984.54 Is attributable to rollback change $ 27,821,643.34 Is actual growth 0.99% C ~ ~~,~~`~_s~ Roosevelt Repurposing Study Group Minutes ~~ October 18, 2010 ~ 7:00 pm ~ Roosevelt Minutes 1. Welcome and Introductions with our connection to Roosevelt • Bennett Bork - Treasurer of the ICCSD Foundation • Mary Knudson -PTO parent and lives across from Roosevelt -active in the neighborhood • Pam Bourjaily -past parent of Roosevelt students -past PTO president -lives in the Roosevelt area • Mike Cooper- University Heights Council Member-taught at Roosevelt • Pat Harney -Johnson County Board of Supervisors • Paul Schultz -Physical Plant Director • Mike Cooper- Member of the ICCSD School Board • Becky Furlong -ICCSD Assistant Superintendent • Celeste Shoppa -Roosevelt Principal -Roosevelt parent - past Roosevelt student • Terry Dickens -City Council Member - owner of Herteen and Stocker Jewelers • Doug Paul - unable to attend -property owner in Iowa City 2. Roles and Responsibilities-Becky • This is an Administrative Committee - not a Board Committee -we are a study group with no decision-making authority • Becky is the chairperson • Celeste is the secretary • Mike is a community facilitator 3. Establishment of ground rules-Becky • Cell phones off • Begin and end on time • Respectful of others' opinions • Balanced participation • Review and vetting of minutes before published 4. Tour of building 5. Review of committee purpose (mission statement) -Mike MISSION o To find the best use of the Roosevelt School property. PURPOSE OF COMMITTEE o Make recommendations of viable solutions for the ICCSD Board of Education to consider regarding Roosevelt School. • We are to seek information from others and bring the ideas to the table • The ideas will be given to Superintendent Murley and then presented to the Board • Criteria 1. Revenue Neutral 2. Neighborhood friendly 3. Educational purpose 4. Positive community impact 6. Committee input on additional ideas to add/amend purpose 7. Review of Superintendent Murley's charge to Roosevelt Repurposing Committee -Mike 8. Discussion of establishing potential parameters for Roosevelt School repurposing • Paul Schultz will forward to committee members the report, "Roosevelt Elementary School Assessment", written by Shive Hattery • To sell the property - it would be sold as is • The ravine is included in the property • Roosevelt is 29, 8000 in square footage • 21% air conditioned -office, library, gym • 6 areas of land 9. Review of article, "The Old School Approach" and DM Register article, "Old Schools Hold New Life" • Could making the facility "green" have a positive impact on applying for grants? • Old Ames High was a downtown school that has been successfully renovated • Smiley Building is a good option for Goggling to find ideas for repurposing buildings 10. RHWK Report on Oct. 20tH • There are principal, parent, and teacher representatives for each of the four schools -Roosevelt, Horn, Weber, Kirkwood • Becky and Celeste will share with RHWK members the main points from tonight's meeting 11. Next meeting agenda -November 8`n at 7:00 @ Roosevelt • Review of ground rules • Review of criteria • Reports from committee members - Paul will share the current cost of running Roosevelt - Paul will share findings in reference to outside interest in the property - Paul will share what ICCSD is paying currently for outside facilities - Terry will share findings in regard to interest at the city level - Terry will share findings in regard to ideas for co-share between Iowa City and ICCSD - Mary will contact Marcia Bollinger in regard to the conversion of a Davenport school - Mary will contact the Historical Society to see about available funding sources - Pam will research the Cos Grove Institute • RHWK Committee report • Beghi to generate ideas for repurposing • Set third meeting date 12. Adjourned at 8:40 DD~1D~1CFrl TIMFI INF Date Activity September 14, 2010 Present Roosevelt repurposing plan to Board of Education September 15-30, 2010 Hold organizational meeting October-December, 2010 Committee work/information gathering 3'd meeting • Narrow options based on parameters 4`h and subsequent meetings • Study/analyze selected options (information gathering to determine pros/cons of each option) Last meeting • Prepare report for board of top options January 2011 Report to Board status of committee work for purpose of developing an action plan ~.. ~ J / ~/,~ G ~I~ ]oint Emergency Communications Center Concerns A.) We are concerned that IT positions are duplicating the work of maintenance and service contracts. B.) We discussed the issue of building reserves to pay for future equipment versus bonding to access the TIF Districts. We should formally ask the JECC Board to vote to keep reserves low and bond for future equipment replacement. C.) We discussed the issue of the number of management level positions. We should formally ask the JECC Board to vote against any new positions until the signatories have formally reviewed any new staffing requests. D.) We discussed the transparency of the User Advisory Group. We should formally ask the JECC Board to vote to require the User Advisory Group meetings to be open to the public and produce minutes. E.) We discussed the make up of the JECC Board. We should formally ask the JECC Board to vote to amend the 28E agreement and move the EMA Director to Ex Officio status, and to replace that voting member with an elected official from a small town served by the JECC. The EMA Director has too many potential conflicts to be a voting member of the JECC Board. Specifically, 1. Everyone else is elected, so they have to answer to the voters. 2. The EMA Chair can sit on the JECC Policy Board, meaning the EMA Director has to vote with his boss right there. It could be viewed as that person getting two votes. 3. The EMA Director votes on building/grounds related matters when working in the same building as the JECC staff. F.) We discussed the entities that created the JECC each take a formal but non-binding vote on the JECC budget each year. We should formally ask the JECC Board to provide adequate information in a timely enough manner to allow this to occur.