The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06/09/2005 Historic Preservation Commission IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, June 9, 2005 City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street Emma J. Harvat Hall 7.00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Public discussion of anything not on the agenda 3. Items for Consideration 1. Certificate of Appropriateness: a. 934 Iowa Avenue 2. Minutes for May 26, 2005 and June 02 , 2005 4. Other 2005 Work-Plan 5. Adjourn Application for H istorie Review Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. For Staff Use: Date submitted ........................................................ o Certificate of No Material Effect 'CJ Certificate of Appropriateness '0 Major review o Intermediate review o Minor review Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Wednesday the week prior to the meeting. Applicant Information (Please check primary contact person) .0 Owner ....?.tf/!:..ß.r......li1..tfY8!!................................... Phone .....}ÆY.·~£:r.q.Z....../...1..)..!..::..q,q7.~............... Address ..~.rf......Æ!..~-:tf!.(!'!(!.C.~~.....t.0.~........... . ..... ....... .¡),r!...~~.I.Y¡. ...+11::..... ~r?:: !!...?... ...... .... .................. email ...I!:1..t!:y.~.~~....~..tf..q.~.~..f.q~............................... o Contractor lVé.ÿ:ðtl.â./:~~i?~.&~.......... Address ...bf.J.:r...I!/~~é!.~~.~...~................... .............J..r?~~~.¡...£'t:......r..?.-:1.¿¿............................. Phone ......?E't..":..!Y.~..?...../.....~¿/...::~f.~............ email ...~~~:?9..~.~.....~?....(!.~.~...:..~.~~.................... o Consul tant ........... ...... .................................................................. Add res s ................................................. .......................................... ........................................................................................................... Pho n e ............................................................................................... ........................................................................................................... email................................................................................................. Application Requirements Attached are the following items: o Site plan o Floor plans o Building elevations ~ Photographs o Product information o Other ................. ...... ...... ................... ......................... ..... If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs. If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure, please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently describe the scope of the project. Provide a written description of the proposed project on the second page of this application. Property Information q ...-- Address of p~rty ..../...~..f.:.......:?..q.t;~~VI:................................ ......................-d1?.~~........f'..(!.7.................................................. Use of property ........i?.f.dlr/l:..k:................................................ Date constructed (if known) .............................................................. Historic Designation o This property is a local historic landmark OR o This property is located in the: o Brown Street Historic District o College Green Historic District o East College Street Historic District o Longfellow Historic District o Summit Street Historic District o Woodlawn Historic District o Clark Street Conservation District o College Hill Conservation District o Dearborn Street Conservation District o Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District Within the district, this property is classified as: o Contributing o Noncontributing o Nonhistoric Project Type o Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar) o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps) o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch, chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar) o Construction of new building o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance o Other Project description ,A ~ j) / // ~( . , . ..............ð.¿1!1.q~f.............?&A!..y..I...tY'.0...........~.?.....~.i.?:P.I......:~.....('/..~.~......t?Q~~.(,?r·...?~!.?t.~~··................. ........................7!.Al.V¿W~....A.O'!.i;-Æ.fU.£~L...à#..¿~.ç¿:........................................................................................................... ...........íik;(...I.~t>........t.0:~......ft!.1(4./.~.......~/..:?:...l?4.....?.....f.!...~t./.f...<~~[q,(!~~?~¡;7....¿fé.(r~:................ .............................;i),A;l.¿~~1t.......I.f......./..tY/1.~4:.~~£è............................................................................................................................... .............6.fÆ.C¥.!.t!...... ..(.tJ..tf¿vt.t/.ZL....¿r:E.I!..¡....t.E.tI:A.r.~6:.. .....Tº.......ì3.!.t.~~........f:!!t.!::.~.MðI..·.....(~¿......................... ........... .... ................ .... .J!:.:ff~..(~t:!t.¢.à. .t....................................... ...... ......... ... .......... .... .................. ... ..... ..... .... ........ ...... ....... ... ...... .... ..... ...... .......... ......... ..... ..... ........................................,.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Materials to be used ........... ...... ........./i<:f¿¿7:!!).......kl.?l.!!(à.t.?I:............................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Exterior appearance changes ...............t2.~()......Æ.QÆ:..,Ç~Æ:L?!.~~I.X~:....f(!~/}I./k.é-........~~....lré4.f.......l:?!L~.'"........a..~C................................ .............g.fl!..'-:.!.1:.f.?I..........~/4(t:.~......?:Æ~A.I..~Á.........~/.?:f,!1;....1.....f.;71:t................................................................... ..............?¿f(!(A.II:!.A......H:!/..~.f:......ð.t£......f..~t:':::.é/!.~~/~&/.....&!.!..I2I......d.~&...CìA!...L~{!.....j(,I!.~~~./..,,¡....... .......... ..... ......<.'?:.'!::.f.1.t./.L.... ..f.T¿¿f......(f./f~lfY.f......T{!.....P~{....WD..{.....d.C...g.~&:.Ç?f(,ç,~!:¿..Æ&¿).. ....... ................ ..... .lJ/.a.T...... .I?€I?~. ~ fI,.......... ................... ...... ......................................... ...................... .................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ppdadm/HP Handbook/App.p65 ~ ~ -,-..., (The posts shown in this picture are not necessary and not included with the postless railing type you selected! Illustration intended to show general deck size and shape. Stair Widths : 36" Some options selected may not be shown for picture clarity. - - .... .... . ..._.~~.~......._---- -..-.---------.. -- ( :J ,,> -- -~>-~^~.~~-~~~-".""'-'-".'"'' 1/ J,_ / , ;/ ",'M '" ' ;/ '::-::'-__'X~: .. ',¡¡if',' '-- >~';-- '/';..0' /19 $', ' '" ' , £>:":,,,,,' -'M"" "",", '-"" ':,':::""""'~":"""'i"":Yn ~~," '~;¡~ ".., , '+';d'i0:ii4':?Bi{~3i0::1',,, ',-:UiYff-0!',;lß4--,,! '/(1.<\\--",- "2{~;~~!~:~,~:';:~1lJtJ~tl¡~~~:~Y4Æy:t ,..,-"'-"" , , ,~.;,:::- ""_'~',,.v:. ~"~ " ""',""" ""., ._--_.~,~~" m.~~~. , ,,-'Ä '-'}¡::;/'f'.",A"", , ,0''),/,»_, '\". ,,~,' ':<;J':;'ii;w,ÙF41," 1-":" '''''w, , ,- 'Y":,;"" '" 'ir. , 'i '" , ''<'#J,. __{ '4_ '--0A0""" 'd- ",' ". " "'-1r ,'~ ~ "'W" :', , ',~, -"VCF' , ,~*,V~k, '" " , , ii ",V"y, ."'r );'iW- , >, "",,,', "", -"."0 'o/!o/Æi!", "-" A" ~,'- .\¡"" .". ,",~?,i . ','X",' -*X'['" """"*:':-; , " ",' + "\' _i"-' , ,,% + '",,,, /\ , .,.,' ',' -, .,,', , » ''0' ,"".- > " , >Y, , ,~, , \i14~;K,:-' " ~{\\r'fi£;:<""" ""-'\/~---- -"<"\,.<$""". - '" -'" -~ ""-"', - - - '"<:'\', '<\-. ''S,-%'>:,., _ - -, ., ^-m.,,_, -, -',. ,--- '-'iIi:%Ø'---- "+'+',-""-,, ''''dC, w"J\ié'!0:ß%X ':vn',_ tt;~_ff<0'<+,,_,_ ,'~- 'i,'" ", '-""-'L- C_' " -, ,. ", -\"'>'-Ä_. _ "','<-. - "\'k'-'.· "\ '" "---;"1'. "''''A., -,~" "'--"'--""-''''''-'='''!ß<i~0':&ML;M_'(_ u ¡ -::~~I~i1~~11{~ktYf-- - ,', ,,:: '-'.-.",.\",- ':./,',', --^"-->X:;;~À;S~;~lt:_- ,j~1\J&';!*;:%1F:tz:s,I;');¡;;:?f¥.;_~~:&k'šk~~~_:_,___:__,t,"""'., ._,_ 2!~ +'",' ¡-"<i%,,:_,--_w~,,,_,__ - ,.\> _%' -\Ú, ,"', .---'-" - -''''T '''_~'9'_, 1\\>;¿L,._____ ',_, --'--:,<:::->~^- :;, ., < '<> -,'" :-·'u,,;;X>,____ Staff Report Historic Review for 930 Iowa Avenue District: College Hill Conservation District Classification: Contributing May 05, 2005 Applicant, Larry Meyers, is requesting approval of Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed alterations at 934 Iowa Avenue, a contributing property in the College Hill Conservation District. Proposed work includes demolition and reconstruction of side entry stairs and landing. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Guidelines for Alterations Staff Comments Part of the side entry stairs is made of wood and the rest (the set of stairs going toward the rear of the property) is concrete block masonry. The applicant has proposed to remove these stairs and reconstruct only the wood stairs. No specific guidelines can be referred to, however in staff's view, section 4.9: Porches, 4.10: Balustrades are helpful for review. Railing would be required as one side of the landing will be higher than 36" above grade. Staff recommends installation of railings of appropriate appearance, material and style. Currently, a metal pipe railing exists. Recommendations Staff recommends approval of Certificate of Appropriateness, provided railings are installed as per code requirements. MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 26,2005 -7:00 P.M. EMMA J. HARV AT HALL DRAFT MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Brennan, Mark McCallum, Michael Gunn, Tim Weitzel MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Carlson, James Enloe, Justin Pardekooper, Jim Ponto, Jan Weissmiller STAFF PRESENT: Sunil Terdalkar OTHERS PRESENT: Stephen Bloom, Iris Frost, Florence Stockman Because there was not a quorum present, Acting Chair Weitzel opened the meeting as a work session at 7:20 p.rn. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: Stockman, 132 Eversole Lane, asked the Commission if there would be any interest in making a landmark out of the old Plug Railroad. She said the section that she lives in, east of Court Street in the Arlington Development, still has a stone bridge remaining from the Plug Railroad. She stated that the Plug Railroad preceded the Crandic and Rock Island Railroads and originated in the l870s. Stockman said the stone bridge is still there, and although the surface is gone, the stones are substantial. Stockman said she would volunteer to help and said she was looking for direction if there is an interest on the part of the Commission. She said the area is now platted to be a trail. Stockman said the area is north of Windsor Ridge and is to be called Stone Bridge Development and developed by John Moreland and Gary Watts. McCallum asked if the area is at risk. Stockman said that it eventually could be at risk. Terdalkar said the land is zoned IDRS, although some concept plans may have been developed. Weitzel said there are several ways to look at this. He said that if the whole railroad was still intact, it could be designated a historic landmark, but if it were missing most of the engineered portion of the structure, it would be called a ruin and could then be considered as an archaeological landmark. Gunn asked if the bridge itself could be a landmark as a bridge. Weitzel said it could be if it is intact. Stockman said that except for the wooden surface, the bridge is intact. She said there are two or three long ridges of stone, with trees growing up in between. Weitzel said that if this is platted as green space and dedicated as green space, that would also preserve the bridge. Stockman said she had spoken with Moreland about his intentions, and he suggested she speak to the City. She said she believes it is Moreland's plan to leave this as a trail space. Weitzel asked if the bridge piers were turned into a trail if there could be a truss on top of it to make it back into a bridge. Stockman said she thought it could be done. Weitzel said the Commission should think about that in terms of the impact of the remains of the structure. Terdalkar said the remnants of the bridge could be used for the proposed trail way. However after alterations, if any, it would not be eligible for landmark designation because the integrity of the structure would be compromised. He said that because there is no longer a platform on the bridge, it probably is already not eligible for historic landmark status. Terdalkar said the creek and a certain amount of land as a buffer would be left intact when any development occurs as they fall under sensitive areas classification. Terdalkar said that if the remnants are used for a trail, dedication to the City may be an option. Weitzel said that the way the bridge is now, the State would not call it a historic landmark, although the Commission could consider it for a local landmark or an archaeological site. Weitzel said the developer will eventually have to go through the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the plat will have to be approved. He said that for the plat to be approved, the City can make sure that planning stipulations designate the area as green space or erodible slope or whatever it needs to be to preserve it immediately. He said the main purpose would then be served. Weitzel said that an archaeological site can be written up without the owner's permission, but that does not give the site any impact except for putting it on a map. He said it will still have to be evaluated, and there would only be an 2 impact for federal projects. Gunn said that making it a local landmark or listing a property on the National Register would require the owner's approval. Weitzel said that when the area is platted, this can be designated as a special area, and the bridge will probably be encompassed within what is already going to be considered as sensitive areas. He said that if the concern is that the bridge is in danger, one would have to make sure the landowner does not knock down the bridge before the area is platted as dedicated space. Weitzel said that the Commission could not stop the owner at this point but suggested Stockman see if the owner has an interest in making this a landmark. 416 SOUTH SUMMIT STREET: Bloom said that he and Frost have owned the house at 412 Summit Street, the oldest house on Summit Street, since 1994 and converted it from a duplex back to a single-family house. Bloom said that the neighboring house to the south at 416 South Summit is the last rooming house in the historic district, and he and his wife bought the property last September. He said he and his wife have been renovating 416 South Summit Street to bring it back to its original splendor. Bloom said he wants to install front steps. He said he needs permission to replace what was there with something that is in line with the architectural integrity of not just the house, but the neighborhood. Bloom said he wants to remove the wrought iron railing and the concrete steps and replace them with what was originally there, which was wood. Bloom said that there needs to be a rail system because of City Code. He said he would use newel posts on the first step, and they would go neatly to the two pillars. Bloom showed a picture of the railing at 406 South Summit. He said he would like to duplicate what was done there, with one exception. Bloom said he intends to install newel posts that are a mini-version of the original square posts on the house. He added that the spindles would be straight spindles. Frost said she would like it to be an aesthetically inviting entrance. Frost discussed using panels on the big and small posts for color contrast. She said the intent is not to make it more massive but to have some trim. Weitzel responded that the owners would want to look to see what was done historically. He stated that some turn of the century houses had such trim, but he did not know if trim was traditionally used on this type of wide posts. Weitzel said the Commission would not vote on the trim, because it does not require a permit, but could give its recommendation. He added that the Secretary of the Interior Standards refer to resisting the creation of a false sense of history. Weitzel said this is a craftsman style offoursquare house, and he did not know if the trim was done like this on others of this era. Bloom said that he needs to proceed with the steps and said that the molding can be added at any time. He said he needs approval for the rail system and the newel posts. Gunn suggested that the Commission hold a special meeting to consider a certificate of appropriateness for this project. Frost said that she wants newel posts, not boxes, and showed a photograph of how she would like them to look. Bloom said they would like to duplicate the look of 409 and 406 South Summit but with a wooden handrail. Frost said that she would photograph 409 and 408 South Summit as examples and stated that the Commission at one time approved the front steps and handrail for 408 South Summit. The consensus of those at the work session was to hold the Commission's next meeting on Thursday, June 2nd at 5:15 p.rn. and consider all the items on the agenda. ADJOURNMENT: The work session was adjourned at 8:16 p.rn. Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 2, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. EMMA J. HARVAT HALL DRAFT MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Brennan, Richard Carlson, Michael Gunn, Mark McCallum, Jan Weissmiller, Tim Weitzel MEMBERS ABSENT: James Enloe, Justin Pardekooper, Jim Ponto STAFF PRESENT: Sunil Terdalkar OTHERS PRESENT: Stephen Bloom, Iris Frost CALL TO ORDER: Acting Chair Weitzel called the meeting to order at 5:20 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION: 416 Summit Street. Frost and Bloom, the owners of the house, presented before and after photographs of their house. Frost also distributed a photograph of the neighboring house at 409 South Summit and said that they intend to duplicate the front steps of that house with regard to the squareness and the spindles. Carlson asked the owners if they intend to have inset panels in the columns that would be reflected in the newel posts. Bloom said there would be inset panels on the columns in future, and the currently proposed newel posts would be made with that style. Carlson asked if the posts were original, and Bloom did not know. Weitzel said that he looked at several foursquares in the area, and, regarding the column detail, several have paneled detailing with fairly wide trim. Carlson said his one concern would be that the panels may create a false historic appearance. He said they would be compatible with the style, but on this building one did not know what was there originally. Frost said the real goal right now is the steps, as they are unsafe and unattractive. She stated that the column trim is a separate matter. Weitzel pointed out that the panel detail would not require a permit, so the owners don't need Commission approval for that. MOTION: McCallum moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the addition of front steps and a railing at 416 South Summit Street, as shown in the photograph, with the recommendation that the raised panels or lack of panels match the porch columns. Gunn seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0. Brennan stated that the City Attorney informed him that he would not need to recuse himself from voting on this item, even though he works with Frost. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Chair. MOTION: McCallum nominated Weitzel to be Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission. Weismiller seconded the motion. Gunn moved that nominations cease. McCallum seconded the motion. Weitzel was voted Chair by acclamation. Vice Chair. MOTION: McCallum nominated Carlson to be Vice Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission. Gunn seconded the motion. Gunn moved that nominations cease. Brennan seconded the motion. Carlson was voted Chair by acclamation. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 2 1111 Sheridan Avenue. Terdalkar said that this is a contributing single-family home in the Longfellow Historic District. He said the application was tabled at a previous meeting in order for the owner to provide more information. Terdalkar said the applicant has submitted new sketches and has agreed to widen the steps to accommodate the Commission's recommendations. McCallum said this is replacing concrete with wood. Weitzel said the steps would be widened too, and a wood railing would be added. Terdalkar said the wood railing would match the existing porch railing and would have two by two spindles. MOTION: Gunn moved to approve an application for a certificate of appropriateness for the replacement of front steps at 1111 Sheridan Avenue, as proposed. McCallum seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0. 503 Melrose Avenue. Terdalkar stated that this application is for a monument type of freestanding, directory sign at this address. He said the sign will be letters imprinted on a metal sheet mounted on two metal posts. Terdalkar said there are no particular guidelines in the handbook regarding signs. He said this sign meets the City's Sign Regulations in the Zoning Code, as it is within the square footage and height restrictions. . Carlson said that this is before the Commission because a permit is required. Terdalkar confirmed this. Weitzel stated that the sign is fairly minimalist. MOTION: Gunn moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the installation of a sign at 503 Melrose Avenue, as proposed. McCallum seconded the motion. Carlson said that it is unclear here what the Commission has jurisdiction over. He asked if the Commission liked the placement of the sign or if it would be better in a less conspicuous place, and, if so, does the Commission have the authority to ask the church to move the location. Gunn said he did not believe the Commission had any authority over this. Brennan said that the Secretary of the Interior's Guideline number nine discusses alteration of features and spaces that characterize the property. Weitzel said he does not feel this sign creates a false sense of history. Carlson said he has no problem with the sign itself. He said that someone coming down Grand Avenue to turn on Melrose, however, would be looking straight at a sign as opposed to looking at the house, as the sign faces Melrose. McCallum said there is a four-foot high fence, and the sign has to be higher than the wrought iron fence to be seen, since it is to be behind the fence. Gunn suggested that if the sign were further away from the street, the applicant might want to have a bigger sign. Carlson said that if the Commission had the authority, he would recommend that the sign be placed in such a way that it does not block historic features of the house from Grand Avenue. Brennan said the bottom of the sign would be four feet high, so that it would just clear the fence and be visible. Gunn said that given the size that the sign could be and the placement that is possible, this is a pretty low-key approach to signage, and he was comfortable with it. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: April 28. 2005. Brennan stated that on page one in the second to last paragraph, "the house" should be deleted. Carlson said that the fourth paragraph on page two should be deleted. He stated that in the third to last paragraph on page two, the word "sites" should be changed to "sides." Brennan said that on page four, in the ninth paragraph, first sentence, the second "not" should be deleted. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes June 2,2005 Page 3 Carlson stated that on page four, in the eleventh paragraph, in the three things to be taken into consideration, he was taking those from the guidelines, and so the wording could come directly from the guidelines to make it clearer. Brennan said that on page five, in paragraph fourteen, "apartment building" should be changed to "rooming house." He stated that on page five, in the fifteenth paragraph, the wording should include his comment that the guidelines that are applicable to key properties are the same as for other contributing properties. Brennan said that in paragraph sixteen on the same page, the minutes should include his comment that the Commission had earlier approved an application for balconies overlooking a boarding house separated by only a driveway. He said Enloe then pointed out that this was a historic district, rather than a conservation district, and that comment should be included. Brennan said that in the last sentence on page six, the word "intended" should be changed to "intend." Carlson said that in the second to last paragraph on page six, "ex pate" should be changed to "ex parte." Brennan said that in the first sentence on page seven, the wording should be changed to .... .or would the old one be used..." Carlson said that in the second paragraph on page seven, the first sentence should be changed to, "Carlson said that the proposed addition dwarves the existing garage and that only one side of the existing garage would be visible from the street." Weitzel said that on page seven in the twelfth paragraph, the tape should be listened to in order to complete the paragraph. Terdalkar said he would review the tape. Brennan said that on page eight, in the seventh paragraph, Gunn's name was misspelled. Carlson said he had numerous small clarifications and typographical corrections that he would submit to Terdalkar. He said they were not of substance. Brennan said that on page eight, after the tenth paragraph, there should be an additional paragraph to include and summarize the discussion of the ramifications of the Chair's resignation. MOTION: McCallum moved to approve the minutes of the April 28, 2005 meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission, as amended. Carlson seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0. May 12. 2005. Carlson said that the representative from 503 Melrose Avenue should be referred to throughout the minutes as Bob Orendt. Weitzel pointed out that Amy Smothers was listed under "Members Not Present;" however, she was no longer a member of the Commission at the time of the May 12 meeting. Carlson stated that on page five, in the ninth paragraph, second sentence, the first item, which was not spelled out, should be taken from the guidelines. MOTION: Carlson moved to approve the minutes of the May 12, 2005 meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission, as amended. Brennan seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0. 2005 WORK PLAN: MOTION: McCallum moved to defer discussion of the 2005 Work Plan to the Commission's next meeting. Brennan seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0. Weitzel stated that the Commission's next meeting would be June 9th at 7 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:11 p.m. Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte s:/pcd/mi nutes/HPC/hpc06-02-05.doc