Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/28/2005 Historic Preservation Commission IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, July 28, 2005 City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 p.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Public discussion of anything not on the agenda 3. Items of Consideration A. Certificate of Appropriateness: 1. 922 East College Street 2. 800 North Van Buren Street 3. 533 South Summit Street 4. 422 Brown Street B. Minutes for June 14,2005 4. Discussion of proposed new Zoning Code (City Code: Title 14) 5. Other 6. Adjourn \ppEcation for Historic Review Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications are due by Wednesday the week prior to the meeting. For Staff Use: Date submitted ........~7.f..L2(.f!..S=..... . ~Certificate of No Material Effect va Certificate of Appropriateness ~ Major review o Intermediate review o Minor review Applicant Information (Please check primary contact person) ~ Owner .....~..Arn.E..~.........G...~RJ,.............. Phone ....(p~.1.:::7......,J..&..(...9·....·...··..·······..·......... ........... Address 4:l.A.......~.......m..äf2..\<:.c::..1......S¡..... .......:r.ð.~.A......c:.\r..~....'t'...X.~.wJ~...... email................................................................................................. o Contractor .......A.l.).~......CQ.M~.:r................. Address ...~..\~.....£;:..........r.:n.~.tu::::.f:;...r.....~t ...........::t......C.A.........~...~.~.............................................. Pho ne ......... ...... .... ..... ... .......... ... ............... ....... ... ... ............. ......... ..... email................................................................................................. o Consultant ................................................................................... Add ress ..... ...... ... ..... ..... ...... ... ....... ............... ...... ........... ................... ........................................................................................................... Pho ne .... ........ ... ... ............ .......... ............. ...... ........... .................... ..... ........................................................................................................... email................................................................................................. Application Requirements Attached are the following items: o Site plan .6iI- Floor plans ~ Building elevations ~ Photographs o Product information o Other .............................................................................. If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs. If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure, please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently describe the scope of the project. Provide a written description of the proposed project on the second page of this application. Property Information Address of property ....9Z2.......E........~..º.~.(ø.'='a. .........................................................................................................,.......... Use of property .....~.p..7.S...........2...~..................."......... Date constructed (if known) ..........J..q.~.~............................... Historic Designation o This property is a local historic landmark OR ¿-This property is located in the: o Brown Street Historic District o College Green Historic District o East College Street Historic District o Longfellow Historic District o Summit Street Historic District o Woodlawn Historic District o Clark Street Conservation District ~College Hill Conservation District o Dearborn Street Conservation District o Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District Within the district, this property is classified as: o Contributing ·0 Noncontributing o Nonhistoric Project Type ;Q Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window j.~ tt replacement, skylights, window open~erations,~ '-.E\Je:.,L.. decks, porch reconstru~tion, baluster repair or similar) o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps) o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch, chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar) o Construction of new building o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance o Other ~roje-::t description ......................7.~\(J;:...........~.£.F...........t.l!..A.N.~.Af?þ.........R..~..E....~....~..§...F.k...AÇ£:........................ ..................W:..'.T.~J...........N..4E..u).......t=..A....k...tI.I.I..r:..l.Q~.~....-::....A..T...r.HCJ:.I..~l2............................................. :::::::::::::::::::4:;:Q:::::::::::::::i.:&::~:::::::ï?A:7::;::~::z..:~:::N:¿;:gQ:;:;;J::r.S:::J::::~:;':;:;;ï::::::::p;¡:r~::~:::::i,,:::~:::: .....................D.l),.Q..2.........J..M........?t..."c..c.......o.~......:T~.¢..........Û..,.J../Ý..Þo.~...:r............................................. ........................................................................................................................................................,.............................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................................,................................................................................ ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Materials to be used ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Exterior appearance changes .....................A.5..............?.~.e..............'P.~4..U............Il....r7..~.çf.(,~-...(.J........................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 ~ 1tT -===flIP" t! I ~'1 ~ ~II 1"1-¡..-.¡- ~ ~ -' II ,",ß ,~II ~I - ~j R~lHH " LL · I'k-i 5 J!~ ¡ill II co¡-;: ~ :!J§ 'l I I Hi= ~ =: i~ , == II ~ J1IIiIll-- '41'--, - æ"'J ' B"1. == ";;;;·"11 ~ III II t " ~ ¡gf,j I \~ 11 ~ 'm",U, >- \~ q=LRJ ~ r- II ~2~ ~l~!;-¡ I'---I-Q -'1--- - I- ì < W H II ~j >- ~ ~o 1ÍF§% ""' ~ H""," II ~~! Æ1 J-I:h It: H I I §~æ ~~¥t :: f-¡-.J ;= f4-Þ-fr Jt I I ;,4 ~ 1 'II _ H II ~ II ~ ~ I I ~I J~~ II ~ ~ I I HII ~~o-¡; ~ mI '-J-.- L, I I ~ ~ "'. ~ A /.. :jJ "j (~') ~ C) () \J ÙJ rJ ~ N Ü () 1 · o'h r J .' \/' ª lJ) J r 'J b ~~ ,00 '011 :a' ~oo ,00 .061{ ---- --- -- -- - -- -- - -- -- - - - -- - -- ò 0 -- - -- Q -- - - - I) I- N) ---- - \'I) - 0> 0 ----- ~ <J) ----- ----- ----- --- -- -- - - - f.r I ~ I I :-, ~ I '0 0 I '8 g I <J1 g I ~I 3 I :n 1<1 I ß 8 I <111 I I I ---- ~- - - - - ----- ¡ ¡ r I ." I i-1--- 'I' -<i .... \.010loI.1 '- 2x8 DECK L¡;;6 :~~ 7' 8" DECK PLAN A R A DECK PLAN RAILING B Staff Report July 12,2005 Historic Review for 922 E College Street District: College Hills Conservation District Classification: Non-Historic Applicants, Uptown Properties, are requesting approval of Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed alterations at 922 East College Street, a non-historic property in the College Hills Conservation District. The project includes: 1) addition of patios on the lower ground level - two on the south façade and five on the west façade, 2) removing the windows to enlarge the openings, and installing patio doors, 3) removing the lower pitch of the mansard roof, finishing the resulting second floors exterior surface with vinyl siding. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: Please refer to following sections: 4.0 Iowa City Guidelines for Alterations, 4.4 Mass and RooDine, 4.5 Siding, 4.7 Windows, 4.8 Door and 10.0 Design Guidelines for Multi-Family Buildings 10.1 Mandatory Compliance Items Balconies /Decks Balconies and decks should be designed so that they are integrated into the overall design of the building. Methods of integrating balconies into the building design may include, but are not limited to, fully or partially recessing them into the facade of the building, placing them under a roof that is integrated into the overall roof plan, utilizing supports that are compatible with the rest of the building in terms of materials and design, and utilizing supports that reach to the ground rather than append on the exterior of the building. When designed in such a manner, balconies and decks may encroach into the required front yard, provided they are located no closer to the street than any porches on the street frontage. Balconies and decks must be placed adjacent to the front or rear yard rather than the side yard. Staff Comments The structure is a non-historic multi-family apartment in a conservation district. Most of the guidelines listed above are for historic contributing or non-contributing structures, except those for multi-family buildings. The patios on the west façade will be placed fairly close to the property boundary. The guidelines do not allow balconies or decks on the side yard. Placing patios so close to the property boundary may create unintended nuisance for neighboring properties. On the other hand, it should be noted that balconies already exist on the upper two levels. In the past the Commission has made exceptions based on the use of neighboring properties. In staffs view, proposed alterations may not be unnoticeable as they are done on the lower ground level. Placing such high railing would be contrary to the function of the egress, if the patios serve the purpose of egress. Staff recommends use of very low railing, if at all necessary. The applicant is proposing two different types of vinyl siding, shingle style on the front façade and clapboard style on all other façades. This combination of siding styles on the same building is unusual for both historic and contemporary buildings. Staff recommends that the Commission require the applicant to use a consistent siding on all sides of the building - either shingle style or clapboard style. - -~ ---- Ap' ~¡cation for Historic RE' . 'ew Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. Guidelin~s for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.icgov.org/HPhandbook. Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Wednesday the week prior to the meeting. Applicant Information (Please check primary contact person) o Owner ........ß..~..R~Je,¿:..c.......... ,'......PiM.?K.:(.).l!l./;(I(o. Phone ................... ............................. ...'.S.'IzI/:~.~/fJJCW4~ .-; J-- Add ress .... :le.},q.~......... ....... ..... .,-:r.:ø..~.I1r.AWl'..r. .....£~...... ........................................... .........~-::':I..;:.a.~'£.¡J.......................... email....................... ........................................................................ ~Contractor .~.t~.I:r1f.f...~.~f..#...hv.y.S~¥l Address .........~.1.'l£.~..¿;),................................................ ................. ..t. øv... ~ ~~...... -;;f.:{.(. ...... ....... ............ ....... ...... ... .... Pho n e ......11.1... t" Y.. r.. ~ J..4.({..¿,........ .cJ)(.Ç} lè?S..£ J..... email................................................................................................. o Consultant .....................N..4.................................................. Add res s ..................................... ........ ......... .............................. ....... ........................................................................................................... Pho n e ........................................................................ ....................... ........................................................................................................... email................................................................................................. Application Requirements Attached are the following items: o Site plan o Floor plans o Building elevations ~ Photographs o Product information o Other .............................................................................. If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs. If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure, please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently describe the scope of the project. Provide a written description of the proposed project on the second page of this application. For Staff Use: Date submitted ......Q7/.JrÞ....I.t??................ o Certificate of No Material Effect ~ificate of Appropriateness o Major review o Intermediate review o Minor review Property Information Address of property .......r,Ç!.º...I.!I...¡¡{......IJ..4c.~...<$..t:....¡;ç..... .................................................................................................................... Use of property ...~.(r.).'t..~..æurieJ...i'Á.(...¡J~.~·II.,n.fJ.~ Date constructed (if known) ...£'i'.&..kk1.G1w.Y.\................................. H~ric Designation : r vd' This property is a local historic landmark OR J2I This property is located in the: ..æ-'Brown Street Historic District o College Green Historic District o East College Street Historic District. o Longfellow Historic District o Summit Street Historic District o Woodlawn Historic District o Clark Street Conservation District o College Hill Conservation District o Dearborn Street Conservation District o Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District Within the district, this property is classified as: ~~, ,..e¡ " Contributing o Noncontributing o Nonhistoric Project Type o Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar) o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps) o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch, chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar) o Construction of new building Œ(' Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance o Other Project description..... Reconstruction of failing barn. The south side-front half of the barns foundation is 10' below grade, basement type. The north half grade changes to walk out level. The south side stone foundation has failed. In the early years the grade on the south side was more than likely lower and the water run off was directed around and away from this foundation area. Over the years, road stone was hauled in for the driveway and built up, and now a very large tree grows there. Water run off keeps the soil wet and expansion pushes on the stone wall. The owner does not want to cut the tree to make it possible to lower the grade. I am proposing to jack and shore the barn, demo out the south side stone foundation and around the comer to the two side service doors, and pour a new concrete foundation wall that will with stand the ground pressure. This new wall will have horizontal and vertical tile system to take the ground pressure off of it. The existing stone wall was back plastered years ago to help hold the stones together. This new wall will look the same, but be strong enough to keep the barn in place. Because of the failing foundation the barn is on its way down. We will jack and shore the barn back into place and then install a new roof system on it. Material s to he used..... Poured in place concrete foundation walls, some new vertical and horizontal beams and floor joist under the barns main floor. Steel rods as need to hold the barn from spreading and would be seen from exterior. Half inch roof sheeting over the spiced roof sheeting, 30 lb. roofing felt, and 30 year Architectural asphalt shingles. Replace missing wood shakes on dormer with wood shakes. Exterior appearance changes..... Looking more like it did 50 plus years ago, bring the sagging walls and roof lines back into place. ~~~--~ . , '~,,", "0V'~, ",'" "-",,,," Staff Report July 12,2005 Historic Review for 800 N Van Buren Street Classification: Listed on the NRHP and as a local landmark District: Brown Street Historic District Classification: Key-Contributing Applicants, Gay Rogers and Steve Vanderwoude, are requesting approval of Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed alterations at 800 North Van Buren Street, a national and local landmark property. The property is also listed as a key-contributing property in the Brown Street Historic District. The applicant is proposing restoration of a carriage house on the property. The proposed work includes: 1) replacement of the stone foundation of the barn with concrete, 2) plastering the foundation wall. The applicant has also indicated that asphalt shingles will be used for the roof, missing wood shakes for the dormer and other damaged wood will be replaced as necessary. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: Please refer to following sections: 4.0 Iowa City Guidelines for Alterations 4.1: Foundations and 4.2: Masonry Staff Comments The structure is part of the landmark property listed on NRHP and as a local landmark. The carriage house was mentioned in the nomination surveys. Except for a few changes on the main floor the layout of the carriage house is intact for the most part. If the carriage house can be restored keeping with the historic character, it will be one of the few such structures remaining in the city. The guidelines recommend repairing historic foundations rather than replacing them. It is also recommended that causes of damages should be rectified to prevent future events of foundation failure. The applicant has also proposed to apply plaster for the proposed foundation. Exiting plaster on the stone foundation appears to be non-historic. The guidelines recommend removing all non-historic material. The structure being part of NHRP and a local landmark property every effort to save the historic fabric should be aimed for. If replacement of the foundation wall is approved, in staffs view, the foundation that will be visible should match the existing appearance. This could be achieved by the use of the original stone or stone veneer. An illustration of alternatives is provided herewith. A....t>lication for Historic Rt.. ~ 'ew Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.icgov.orgIHPhandbook. Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Wednesday the week prior to the meeting. For Staff Use: Date submitted ...........Ql./'J¿¿!.Ç??.............. D Certificate of No Material Effect ~ Certificate of Appropriateness D Major review o Intermediate review D Minor review Applicant Information (Please check primary contact person) D Owner ...i.k..~!ic:~~~.~.1~...h)Ù\.~+............... Phone .. ...5:2.º.~....J.qJ. ::;...'l...£'=<..~.... ........ ................. ...... Address .........!.l.tJ.l..AI:r.tn.d"t/...Id~..I11!r.:k,...I~...~".. ..........................................................k.Jk...~~bfl.c............ email............................................................................................... ¡J( Contractor ......s.rfw..hr.,.rP....~kW.J:.:...LT.JÎ.............. Address ..~..?'..:.2.~-:.....~....ª~......................:..............f ..........R~.~...~.................;:¡¿rYJ..s.fy,.~¡..... Phone .............J1.1...c..~.i:...3.(.;;:o...à....çJ{t..J!..~-.~3 email............................................................................................... D Consultant ............R.A:.......................................................... Address ............. ................... ................................ .......................... .......................................................................................................... Phone ................ ...... ....................... ....... ............... .......... ................ ......................................................................................................... email............................................................................................... Application Requirements Attached are the following items: D Site plan D Floor plans D Building elevations ~ Photographs D Product information D Other ............................................................................ If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs. If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure, please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently describe the scope of the project. Provide a written description of the proposed project on the second page of this application. Property Information Address of property ........6~¿....J;.J::t~.!;Ø,,~..t...,................. ..............;;J;P..!-r.':t..f;~..Ç.~.................................................................... Use of pro perty 1h:t:.~.Ît.1.ro.L.......... ......................... ..................... Date constructed (if known) .....¡J.~~...I.5..rf....1f)li.~.f:f¡,~...... Historic Designation D This property is a local historic landmark OR ~ This property is located in the: D Brown Street Historic District D College Green Historic District D East College Street Historic District D Longfellow Historic District f( Summit Street Historic District D Woodlawn Historic District D Clark Street Conservation District D College Hill Conservation District D Dearborn Street Conservation District D Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District Wi~n the district, this property is classified as: .$ Contributing D Noncontributing D Nonhistoric Project Type D Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar) D Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps) D Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch, chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar) D Construction of new building r Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance D Other Project description :::R=~:;:':;:;'¡¡;;':::1ij;;:;.:;:j:::~;'~I;~¡;Z;:;¿:::;'£J~;t;¡::2P .....J.~:1../~1·~····~··..d~...c.LI...~.~k:...d..W.1.~~.kA.~~~......................................... ...................AIIy....~..iM...k:L¿LY.;J......~.../h.....~......Þ..fcL.::6lI4¿.,~.............................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. .......~J...¡1/.().dJ..i~...~..vX.f1J.·.~...&.....kIl..øc#J..¡d.-f!.~l,....¡¿:t.~...~4-..I6x,..¡.:...iM.I.:;Â.............. ..........h.¿{cL·I·,¿~····..·tJ:!Æ.!t~·kt:-e......~.......................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Materials to be used ::::::::::::::"Jk~:::::Pd4:::::~µ"L:d:;;;;l::::::::~:~;JL:::=:=:;;:¿¡::~~:J:;;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................&eHl......¡).V.C....¿f:hu.~.J:....................................................... ................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... Exterior appearance changes :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::SX=:¡¡;:::~:I1.::::k:;k:::::zï.:¡:::;¿~d:::::;¿::::;;;;¿CJ..::;~:3..:::~:~;::~:::::::::: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ppdadm/HP Handbook/App.p65 -_."~----" - ~ J¡'"" ; >;I;;i>">~'''';t'''';?''/'i0~~1~7{~1WŠVf;W¿~,0fY%iYr1i:ç;>,,:Y'7'»~);:"?':"-X7<;0::;rxÙi&':Tí'k/"/Þ~:""1Y;;1'""-'f;'0i";;'¥""W;';"¡h$!~}v1Hf1gif:0þ?'0:%JI?-r'YM^,%'&W%?",,'IW\0WS'!'\'?''0'V0/7'''^'''; '''A·it,n. '''""''''8''''"'' "'""'~'" "" ",'';"",', , "; . "XÞN'\./YSiUL·, Yd!;fj,<MA> ,~J '/;:;fZl d"i,t\'¡jh'~4f:&W' ''+,:ËfjjFW'JW;j,J ',v",'(¡;;;,/Y:\iff/),L i ,,/W/¡ i "Y;+V)·" ¡O','!i:.V,¡ ¡\, j ',' >i'i." '\ Wft Î ,,/' , \;?01~-~,:' :", '; :', ~~~~~:f\'!s1i}~;~(~;¿~~~~:î:;'ií~~~ii~~i~;fj~~}&!:{:;!~Wkk:~~~~~ \'::&~j~~~~1t~tf(~§ff;{~~~;~~iïi;\Q;;~4~)~{~ß~1: ¡;iŒ:'t~t h~,;:" ' ')':'it;~ty\ì\,.- """'-''- , ' ",,,, r i "~YN' ""(;"0'" ,¡S0',,"P, ""'V<'>;"Y1.~',ßJ,')¡ ,'" W¡t\, (t'" U" ;0,t ," 0 "0fP~iMjmf'Y};;j?';' ,'" ,i', ,:Œ'.-:1l?iL,< 'I,',,',,' tt; ,," ,,' ," ,><", '4'( ~ , ,'~,," [:xit '?' ) ';'{Sn:i/C;>: ' " , , WJ,\,X'"", " ;r""«";"'-'i;'¡;;¡,,<:KS">; ;:¡ ),. \i':'é'l?;-S';(. 'Yl?,A,Mj);'i+':\i,'" '" ' " ,f, , I,' ""h, b"'""'"''N!i~;;:''''' ' ", , . ',' , ""\A st",;;,,,'" ,,,"', '";,:",,," '0 ' ,d ~h'/ ';, ffÞ1!Þ8h" ',,",';":',,' $/'>' , ,'"" ·y:,' JiCY Y0it}@tg ;"~j0~f1';;,' dn,jJ;1~<"'J"Z\i\{?;;j"0-'/ ,'~ ;'r/' " ' fii .- "'!~:i" ,.. "Jb"'~i5.'H¡;'i\;';,,,,, ", ," >" ,,, ',0 , , E,~)~< .; fi%"JA¿, 0~:;;,('0(;N!j<¿ii<"ijj;; ,), ,), ," ", (i'V:'Yii' . ( '>if<" " ",,,' , " ) ,i ' "'-:(:- , "", ",.0''''''' , ',:,3':, , :\\hh ,;0:,,;;;\P/P' ,"Xl',\ {"; , ,~, \,,', : "{i:" ",iil "'""'FF<1", iYW;" ' , ,;':,)':", " ,',,' , , 'Ai' 'y¡'"if't\J. H~1\'þ''j,jN'"'' ii"" '"i' C/,,!' J,' ,f,' "'" ;;i ""~, ""TV' ,.", ' , , ,tV'" '~<J'7"!'" 'pAi,: ',', '-;<,'¡ ',' , '",:, , "'V,·/0/;" j"~~f"'j'I"""';-"'v",,''':'' ; ;: , ~/"'!f,''H,,, ,,<iJ.-It\ >. ',:3, ,';J«;; " ';i ,,"",'. ''\' i'p"""~" '" /ii'-/, :-;/" ,> ';',:+Y,,>ò;, ~©,%!;.!'}(Ù 15>'))7/\';;,' '" \' ' >: '; Z "/1/ 'Y'f~¡"'" i, ," "",,, '"c \1f!;\;'iY, ,);.>/,,'t, ~;,;" 't / Mp,""""'¡""o,<y,,",, (, ,;, , ",. <\,j:',t';t " ~q::" ",," " j' ~P¡"" ' ;c," ",,,) ,'/. "" K (iI~b9>(,j;<~~/"'>"'>';' "'i' VI-"',", ,', "" ,', irJ'q.5/;,' '" ,"';> ' . ¡' l "Vi'j'/c',," {' ,;¡, (,' , ~'h'"h /"" " ' ,'" '1\'7,","'"'' ," ',' " 1iI//" ,\ ;-.. "/' ;;'f'.;;,'· ,-"if,,''''-', , ,"" "/'. ) "/""";':,/-1'.,' ""I/f,! ',,"" :"",,',,', ',:"f/' ff;\":' ',.c);',,\ ~, ":::' f/,' " ,:,:'i-':' ff:S':'-',' :'--;';{ðR';":,j" S';è, ,',;¡;ø :;";"-',,:', .' t,. '" ... :-] " ~.' .~ ii',,, yo () .~. ' G-ì {S \ .... ,.'. \ , , . , , , "\, '\" ~ ,;",,' .~ "I"' , , · , , \ I, :...'.";'j:'''jj':, , ( I ' ,j, , ,¿, 'I' . '~S'~ ,4,< ;/::4; Jb,>" Y,"" "",'" qh ;'\,1"'Þ rl"" '0 · , , , . , , \." :-;" ., " \'/ !,,' i" ~ , , , , : , , , ':;\, · '. · ;''.. " " " , " . "" ....,' «, ,/ ' ", >"-,' /" *lìiii¡"1 ':·'···';~%Yih/' , ','. .__....~~' , " "'I"",¿j(S",,{;¿LU",,,.,,,,,,,,.,j;):i'1V'jY":'" ""'.'-"':""';;'.' ,IY<'<"('f";\,,'/',"'/ " "'''""""""",,,,,',,,/ i,"!'" '¡"'e'(',."""""-"""" ,'X,,,,"" 'k' ;:.:;"~;."".),, ,"-; ,,,',',/,\,,Jß"" ";:,;,,,;\,;¡,",y,,;,,,i,,, ,"I'," "",,--,,"," I""'"'''''' ','/. ,'",'''"',,;'';,',,/,',, · ,',', ",,' ,''','~ "',j \ "''''''',J')<u,''''- :,;,.-1\;", 'd,', ,i,V ,,' 'r/Yh' i' "",;j//',>,þ)--'; "'Yi.'.-'/'. f""i\"",,,, 'ii'"",', ""',"' ,'," , " "',;",''':n"''",,,,,\ \EO",;,;\\,è,",--"""?\",, 1:',:~'</!'I".;xr;,,<;,\I,,/, ' ,', "i,"""'" ,"! ',\<",',,""",,>,,\/(:0';" "",,/,^,,' '''..i/';'''''' '"'' ,\',0) '¡,ii. ~i·~, ),' i" "",' ¡,I'<'-\,""""""""" ,', 'Ii"''''''''''''',' "è.,i"""''';''''V'", A,'" '''Ii,'.' ,. .,J,', · "·d'· ..,' I"""""'" ,,",/'" ,""",...-"",\'\ '" ',,' ".," ", ,,\,' K/,,' ;"'"" "v,"'" 1""'>/';""":>""'\'<,, ':"','i',';':':'>'::' ,'>"--"'\\;\:«<,,ii)';\'><I;'-';' :,",)'.i::' ','"" ''''i,''V,'> """,,' .. ,')'I"!-;<,',;,>',;,, '" ';V«~""'" ,,'>" ",/' .-,...,' ,,",' " '-:,'"y"",""" "<'i' " ,.-,)/"",,, ""';"" ;'/,'-i./: "c;>i> """"";,,'d'>t!;).-(, "y.,'/'U/P/j¡ ',";þ'"""",'), "'x.",' ¡ "òi\',',;,"" ,,,,', "',I"'''' ',F;';;','';"e}':,'"" '/' )"ç",¡,., 'Â1{ >;"'/"'>'1;<;--"; , "; :):""",,,y,, "".-,""" (.'C/"'" """"0,, '//1'/';.-'" A,fHi<' '; Y',"'iY,>.-\A. '!jA<,";,,:lW ",',/," ,""~"h',',' 'W';J','""" ,d4si.'Ji.-ß "",,,,, X"'F',c ,fzJE'Ztt i.!,."Y' I , , , " , :-i:'~"¿: ("( ., , , , "" '", ';'(¡;'\A",,{\:JÄ"i 0~\::t;}1("~\J"; \;',,1; ,,»¡;;\t",Þ;)S/)\ :.-,;;:',',/þ":'}'\ ':,' ",,;.,!:< --;-"":':,:'y,;";i ,';-;C'"",",'",,,,>;, '1'" ".. ,Þ (f ' ¡,PL"" "'" "", ""''''"'' "':,'::, ,,!, ';'\';'," , """'" ',," /",'/' , ", oJ'" ' ""'," , ',"', ,>,' -,i"""'i- '" , , " ' " ,,', , . ", ,,) 4.~ . ' ,,' "':".';) "" ,"" :«i(;,,,,, ; ,,', ". ~---~-~o/#'iii~~.w..--,_YØf!i!ii;Ä",,*,,"","'0J·"f~" '~';,"';""'~~"';"''''''''*,!Ä,_"~~,,' ,.,,,.·,,.,,,,,'.'ni5;;V,/~ ,~, "i , ""," ,", ' " , ' ~ ~ , , ',-" ',"', "", ":',"'-', , " , ,,;.(,,' :,<".':'-><, ~ "',.,' ',';'-' ' ,. <-''-:',(,,''i' '<»i',,::":, , ,~,:~I,j/ti/i;'<>"" ", ,"', ,/\'.;,''"X:hPV:';','./: ~ ,);::> , -: ~~,I "Ù(yv,f0!~"," 'j ":'- 'Û;"~'''-'''''''¿B!à&!J],t,\ " ",':"':?i, ;y',;' " ..' J."<,;;""",, ""'" ::"""-' " /",' , ",', " 'Ki' f"J ' ,",:',",',':,:;;,' " &lÐJj'.'/»" . ~J'), .' 1\ :'f;;", " , ",""':',/": IV'" ' --\>t fl.!,ù', ,,;:;"---',¡,N" {:(" ,.': . ¡;11';;1".-';;,,"', ";"-:',,;'--,' {,""'''''''' :Ci':;::: " 'vi'!' ~!. "",'¡," ,,v", , ' , W'" '.)'-,"D '!' . V,'''', ",:<'-}i . " %~;;'{\":"" -:'{",t;(,' ' '. /;:.."" ',;;,:)' 'J,,',; " ,,', Bt-,{.': " ~:i.~ \"" : f~~¡~~~~¡\;iB:,;;,:;:'-.',~¡-,;,,;;:;,i_\R;,::':;'i1i.;·. r~;\Y;,k:r<'~'~' ,~jt!J@')'i.'t ... .,( ~; , '--L.. " ' , " , 0;'> "':'/, , u .~ . 4' " , ~ ¡'>\~' ~ j ~:<~.;.) .~,' ~\, ' f:'ŒjK'š1A,.-U:W:,r\//i,': .<,,:';' '.,;:;yš://i i::-; ";'"", " ;{':',';, ') >:>,,^, ..,~ If" \',,' ',q,' ~, þ'C>' 46)' ''', ','if' , , , . '/ . , , . · , , . , . .' · , , , , , · , ,,',--, "~',I ""I'" ,<,"/V' ';;'I>}> ?"'"'' ;''''',', >',+' ,'; '. ''', /.- "', , , ',<' . , , . ''; {h ,'" '),\\"'1 " --,. ", ',,, ",--"' , '", " ,? ',).. , , , 'i/ , , . . :' ;.- J , il,....': /\:* , ? , , ,,) , " " " , , "" ,¿Æ ,"',:;Y, , /ç~l ,",,' ,;'% , "",}'!(',; ","'" ,",'!--:::y, ,";;;:l ,)J:; 'i,'\i]; , ));':3Þ ,',II" ,'" ,"",\ Úic, "', '" , "',;~f "A , ,,"); ":" ,,' ,'>); ,,','" ,\,i,¡ . , " i'·' ,~k ;''/' :;,' "j'.- " ., , , , , , .. . , " ", " , .,' , )',<H,'''- "1,~p Wj1)\i ", \'MY? 'f §7!;'",' Z,,' , '>'>"'" ,',' ',' ::tV>;' " ", ij""',' , ç:Ú»!' i ,'4 " /f '/i i' ,,: ,/ ," " '!! />'" ",", '-",' ---'!if ,O&5>, \ip:>:'..', "" " 'I .. ;'¡"k, \,'''? <{:fiG J\>+;¡ ,', ,"..'I." ~';:iiÞ-'~t'i:~~.,: /, "'~6é\¿'i;, '}1,"', ¡)i§:,1!\j:( "^"!' '<:""';¡i'¡';~.' .11;<",",,/,; , ,',;(J,t '~Y/;//",,, ,/w "''''",;;',$' .~¡' , 'iP¡ijj>'0~:<" ,Jiig',1J'h?\'{l.O ,&",""3 \",- ! "¡ ':~ ^ ""-" ' " 'Wf'A,,"",,' 1!.-"',/",^\Y/C C,!'Y/""-;',",;'''';:,,' ''i'''<.' ¡':;¡""" "Ai 'd'N//(i'id ,,,^(,~"""'" 0Yk:!;,>j1/i?' "',1 ,,>%,',~, ,5;',,\:\ 'p"",'!'"", ^""",";,," ",,""Ai',,'.""'" '" "i"" ',,' , .-'0,"'" ""'," "f'I/\,'""'j ,,,,"',,,, " , 2" " ,~X;!YL, l'Wr.0Iiiz+,?? ii'¥<;¡Si;<Z ':', ,/;~,I,;,;, 1;;\ i:\'.'/:',n>r\,^^'Y<~'š:;..! '~~*%,FA;,,'Z' ',',f",l'-' "~iYW1 ,'fuf:;(i"f}%'\'A t, ,t/,<:r"',¡,,,"" ig*¡;P\;~1M¡;¡X~~~j"" ~ """":<>:,/ ", ""''''" ," , " ;,,-,>:,-';";:x/::,;;,;-;, y<;+,>~ , "/~ß}"'" ¡L","""¡;' ¡,y!<:tÚ,~';::!:;!<"0hY0!)f"" I' \2" 'i0,%'0,/i\;+>:,,'/' "J" '2, ,"'<,""1 Z"h Î ,'cv, " y\" ,;.:)'\ .'),", ," "."""";"""",,',:,, ,; /", :;"'f' "i '\!dY ,;\/7""') t .,:W" //:"-:>1,>', "Y~':"';:¡i"N:Y1(','&'/<h.(¡ii') ,r:".c;,,,-t<''¡''W0;;¡;,;,;'\\'jj);,'''(Ä'f>:}¡{i¿Y'' ~,'; "'if "\," ., "; ';',:,,:,':,'.:« /" "'.'-,".-'/'\','<' ,,' """iN/ "'~""""~"')"(' ""i'f.',""'y">",'., ';. ,:'-"h"," ''-''':','':':'',;,::/;":",,,,:,'' ' ,''',' , ,," Y,", "",,",Y»;;..- \ ' ".'''è' ' ',',(@'jff' " '";~ '" v,,~, ,'\.-""""x"" X¡;;Z,>.:.¡/d!,;; " , ' " ' ., ¡ Oi,:: ;.(Ä'';'' , " / y,;>',..: :}\~i)'¡:')" ,:,":¿3(;"// , ;', :;>L'^',\;,)'>1;W¡':~¥jk«','3t!;:?>;\,}-,\:",,,,';,~~¡¿;;4:jj/!'.,'\';' ~< /, "'-,,", ,,;,j;Ti&¿[!(š:¥,,;'( :::,:;,:,::':',"~>,""""'{:',:;,/'07 '\ ",.. ,,'/, ,'" ,','" ;" 1:, f"" "" ",,-'7"';"-",' '/ifJj1iX,,--, ¡, " '''" ;('''S''' 7ffj',-Ç;1"1T"'P;"";'>'-:~-~'^'-~~'~~~r~"'"'''''t,.,,'*1 ;,::..;, ',','''':,:,';;:" ", ",d¿/>--:,,', ',v;","" ',''-;(1'\;/<" ;"',),",,' "'/<n'\d/~» ::', ' , " '>:'('Hcifu<¡/'\' '--" , " /;' ( "'" ,''',,<\ ,,;:%:;WL;:;J. ''V<+/i -;';?0,%\'/é,J ;;W',I';t,.;, ',,; A--~Ji!1~':;:/,/';;jj0::t;)", ',', ' '\ -:- ..:L; "14i0tt;K~' " :':';':--.:' , '''" \ j' REi, ,¿í§i§:,)jYo", ''iX1èsX{) 'SP:"\">,'Ì'\"'"'' '"'",;"" ";;»'2.1 "'""".:] """'-''-<'' J"-!' ''"~'''''' :,:::'-/':' '}::" '" ,:\\";, ',;" ",;,;:v )\'~\;"K:'ì," 2h3Œ¥!iFf2Ki110h\.-'L^ :SW'{t"'yx0i04f'lii'iJ;?¡,;!'Zí&Y¡',;&i-;C"'i.¥+1"';3h i\;",;~<:"" .-: ~ '~~/ ~l(::f:¡;:L ~ 1\'~f!i?,--,"Yj!."!J!fWl'£;j'f}1fi1Wr01[jj{Vh ,,' , '''';¡:\~' t"f,;'-,/i,'" ";ii.' ",...1,%"",..,»,,,,,,,,/),, , "-"',' ''''"'S0-\0/V·¿,)·~"ç ~'-H ,è", ,,,, t".')/£\',;"", 1 ',"':""",', ,..,....-:,,;1'<,0',''/, ,},'>"V¥'''h ","">, ,'n A'V'"' ,,:""",',,:' ,-""","ý,¡;,,'\<;,JJ',,':!V,'A'\.- !', " ^",';'t\W':',"i',',,.-" , ,K,>""'>,,;f,),, , ,,!,';¡ ,F" ~,,1," 'ie',""" .- '''')i'.)',h),''ÞV".'~'''' " ,","" "',"' , W"',""I'''''(;1''''''-''''''I'';' "',' "'''iit' ,,' " ';'Y',,;,-Hlf;;{0s,&;;ftt¿i@';' , ,." ," ' ':JA; ,~ , 1~'»,;j:Xyifg!z" ":,iX>,,:;:',:,', ) 'A~:}y,)Ky<{;¡,· ,'~ ,,'~ I' .Ç~,",/'.-'h;<i!:X-;(>'0, ,'~\,\,kf'" ;'!-" ,"", ,'i/'!/, "<-'M"")!:- j¡"''i " ',:, . .":, ',: , l'9~;,;;[])N-j',0f..G~Y,"\<, )71"'>/,\" ',. "/,, :-y, ,'," ' · 1';'''''1'''0:8\\ 't;;,"'/,,,o >;, ,,,,' , "''''0'''''')'"' '/1(:/'/',,' '", ';,::.:X/:' %.¡~Z::if*l~\:?;-g\¡}ç) :l0'LiT\ ,.' , ,', :Ú,J::-;," 'i"'::;; ':1{\i}\0:¢0;b'i " <i:::',,;: ),.-,,' >::,:-;'{'):':'"Y ,'WN/'ib:;;, ,!,,,,,' ',f':';'>'" , ' , «,"":,,i'i"'';,'"!'" ,.-,'", " ' , , \y"'>(·,+wJ,'iP, '.\j;;¡",>' ! """'''''h ',' \".-'\,~'} " , ,,/ ,,>,,~/\vy ',:,:',':;-:-;-;','::'::,,:.-,,!. 8'i,.-."'J,,"N"', " "'»f§òù',t.;''iKç«i)š,:n* , ·"'2i''J'A/Y'",;.!!<, '\'Vf:,:äi.j:t!BÚf1;!;')lJt, "'o'"<"",-,,,"'.- x::sf-»Y;YI,h;;-,,·t '""""",,),,:', " ,{\,\,!"'W" I", !"J"s ""--'>' >;N:'/;JK\J.\ , :0;-+:;(<->\;;1" ",:',',', f'''->'''',v:;¡-''', 1",,"'\"''''''';»: ,'''b'''Ùp l¡);,\(f\!f¡,§'"J!" &/!--""" ,;i"~--: "",,,,,+1'/'0£ ~); f "t"J0J¡>Ÿ ">"~0X{''- F,St/j:,!!<if¿t" ""'-'",,' ¡q;;'-",,' 'e,p-o,y, , KG'^' .æ4'~ ~~' , ;,,' ''''I'' "~ , "I'Kßt "(','.-0P\ ;'Sj'¡!jð· " é:: '" ( , , , /', , , . , · '. '." 'y); " f ',' , , , , " ' \, " , '''''-,' ",,';>YD " ""~,, Iyf} ,><,?t;; , /', ,"i'" ",,'';iN ","":,, ; <)<,,;.,¡i' , '" '/,'<''''i " "", · , :::è('.' II "" FA ,'" , "'.-'^''.- ',,:,Y,"','" .........:,:>;>t<';';:<,:,:/! , ':iV, N:;,''''''--;,', "", '"'-"", ',"" ""m,,,, " ><J,:':;,':¡,: ","i,"..i;'-\".' ;'/..:'t,')' '" ,/" +;;/';;'~>/¿ '"'' >,,>' "" ,,>-->,"',;;: ,'>''',' :"y'" ,,"""" ,-,,).; ",,(d ,,"+'-:jj, ""'\1:111(' J:0¡~~' ,,', "fw "';/"'>;1<3> ,""'-'"-';'>T.-<\',7;; ,',___" """"',";,,:/.-,,·,^,:;..x> '0"./2'<' <,.-z ,l.W/~~L~~'" ,e', "Av+!'Y.-'''''''''/) ","" ''''''''i'S-''-''',' ,,' ",;,/.-;>S?;")N.-' (.-.,,\',¡,J((!f;;:M;/':-J, "¿-,cm,,,' "~ßJ""';Y0'i!¡:" Wi£,~tw4;¿;~1Ji;(0J¡ik ,',i' :§;" "i.;à,';¡" !y:;'8iY,1%AJJ,!ii, :;'fS",';S1&.YTi\' "',~,,' XC6' "Xi' .--", .~, ')'" '," '" p' " " ; '..,:,\,\cy , ,/fj+Cé\'</<i.JC,<,,','<,<'j\ ""ii''!l';$' . ,9/'.- :¡;.!;}; ,,--, ,-' / \ '\)c,>Y'.<> I¡\\<)~<\':<; , ,', '>/"14:<;.' " i !;;¡'ö''t'áY;''/; ""',\,;",'/',,,,',;,,.,,, ,/,>";,',:U>;,,,' , ',.,,'\/ ",,,A',' ,-"'(Pi( ~ 'Ak''iJ'',-,X";,,,^,,,é'YÒ'<,;/'r.r';.-l%;:;+;i,',''-' ,:,,,,,_,,{,,,,,,,,,,,,,,^,,-,,,',/,) ,)',;:.....'Y wifÄ't#""'~{*,"I.¢M,';¡"'''"'''''''''.'#''Y''"?:':''-'!'''''''''~if.",,* ',"_""fi0 lTI'tißIm , " ..'~... r· !~f,(.,. d.-\H 1 .;1' . II' , '11<,";"-'" ' ,\ ";;;Y;'I ,c,j,,'''' , , '"" ,;'-"-,'"" , "', " ,"" ," "," ,," ,'-',,', '^, '_' .' if,'" ", ,/ A>, ,b ~,< ' :,/ " ",', -,,¡ , "d#'<" '\;" '"," '-\< ,"'< "'\;"" ',' .-;""" , ''''" ";<i:;;,' J'd ,~'/, ,--",,'t "" " ",' '><J ,'1",,, ",' ", ".. "'.' ,';q, ,., ''''i1i'"U'''', ) ,," "" ',» ,,"& W' "'{ 'I'," "'ù/.- ','-;.,~,,', '" "þ,';, ", ,,;" <> ';,;"',1; "-"',' \' ""', '<\, ,'" ' "\)y, "\,, "", ,,/>; "", """I ''''d'', h".'-';,,,,'" '\ </;;'-,,,': 'b,¡Y'/'IÙ;\!, ,>' ;',' \';, d ,/,.><~¡ "'),,,\),'/yji' ",',' "', " --' , ",,¿.-j?/H<}./' ,';'> ' ,¡.- ,'/., A;¿.'';::iYi!m<>:),,''·' J \,b</¡ 'I "";,'-1-'"r:>" ''', ''i'''','" (Xl'I'.'\ ,," "'",, "".-.,' " \'''>.'' "," ","~'V ,',.,0.;;-'>_'/"':<;;;/2&;>'.-2:",,/-\,, ,!-,.Jt/ :~'/, ;'(;;3<-0 /+;""'i"';;¡?i!.-/b! ,'7"<' ,',,,,'i,,, "'(,', " ";" "'''''en:- """"",,, '.."''''' ''''''ii " , '''' ,', ,,";: .,"""',.-' " ,',,, ""I 'è' "I·' . ~ " , " , , Qî;}1' :; " , " , i%i~¡;:-~;;~J,;~':{:"~~';~" ,~,:; ;;;(~~~:~: i!8~%0iW¡ tJfFr¡".Jpr<p "j>;", 'j':' ~,\.j:/ ¡j!:f:qj)~ª?¡ <HJ,<"I" ,~' ,," 'X"i?" "/;:1' It '¡;'!,(!i''(~!?~.'"'¡''' " ;:/>i.j,,~ ,:- "V, "',",,'\'W, " ",y" ", ,'" j "'<IVY";'" "" <'-"" "" ''<, '«»!r'-/ì/ix" ' ,';,')"<,(" ""'0 J$t'i~t\i;"':,!' "'~,';¡ ! ,J\ÚiJyj ;;;;r(\({@lf~ 1;:;4'''';;;'\(' ' /" «+\;'1;;:1,,", \;/)1 py",,~:(, -,"",,; t ,,"h ,-,,' 'C.0'LdT'i>"'" ,.; ,"\<, "",,;)%,"\' :-:04«';/')", '\\:>/"" :¡·',¡~id>' ('"i'{'" '(" ',c" <i,,;è,' "",,;:<>':' ';HY'" )j§J;í¡i'/i':\<' Y/?'i\.. ,,)(j:';'(v,> ~~1-Þ'\6;tXi;':' :,,'1 j/>\,',v" w ", ' "'?i' ",,) ,puú '" """" , ({Wd;',' "( i' v ' "J ',,.-', ' ,", , 'i!,i: " ,,' "'''", ,¡ , ! ",,\,. ',,-' " '\" , \ % # mflÆ 1,;;:':;!+þj)W:~;:j:'Y")/;/I/'" I, ,,;\;+< (,' " 'h' , ' W.r ',j\ fit ,.';,¡ ",(WI;;?, ",,+ 'I;;" '2::\'1'::;;» >, :¿" <ià!?':1.t ?*~f',Þ!i;\J~t;/0!';'<' 'J/:!:!;!if"Vi:);~/>"Þ' I< '~'<iÆœ{!ttj~"d, , ~âïi¿l?¥~0&Jt::íW4¥~~~ì¡~~~,&~}~":~jK{t:J~ij /{!",'/ Vi." '/' ~ " iX""i ,,,(\,,; i""","'M ":\<:' , <è',''.',' ,<, {, "," ,,",' , · ,. ~, " . , ,¡.- , Y' 9· ",iV,-.-"." "'f ",'~ """"fyi'''' (¡iR'''Þ "}~' , ,18/" ., , jf '/;, ., · , ,., ....~. ,..J. ,,';~ ", 't" "f ''¡'" Ô',' " . , -ii, <i" ,,"J " , Staff Report July 21, 2005 Historic Review for 533 S Summit Street District: Summit Street Historic District Classification: Contributing Applicants, Debra Pughe and Jon Winet, are requesting approval of Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed alterations at 533 South Summit Street, a contributing property in the Summit Street Historic District. The applicant is proposing replace window sashes for all the windows with metal clad wood windows. The applicant has also indicated that they would like to replace the wood shutters with PVC shutters. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: Please refer to following sections: 4.0 Iowa City Guidelines for Alterations 4.7 Windows Staff Comments The house was built with the influence of late 19th/early 20th century American Revival style and some Classical Revival features. It shows in the symmetric arrangement of openings and the use of two sidelights for the entry door on the front façade. It's also common to find the shutters on such houses. The house currently has aluminum siding. Despite many alterations, the main structure is intact and retains most of the feature to recognize the architectural styles. The guidelines recommend repair rather than complete replacement for the windows and sashes. Replacing all the windows will be a significant loss of character for the structure. In staffs view, possibilities of repair should be examined. The applicant also proposes to replace all the shutters with PVC shutters. Existing shutters appear to be a later alteration, although it is common for the houses of this period and style to have shutters. The guidelines recommend to no use shutters if they are not historically on the house. Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation recommend original wood material rather than synthetic. If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible when replacing material beyond repair, then a compatible substitute material may be considered. .'. plication for Historic R~ . iew Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Histor'ié Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa Gty Historic Preservation Handbook. which is avaHable in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.icgov.orgIHPhandbook. Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Wednesday the week prior to the meeting. For Staff Use: Date submitted ..........ø..7/?::.r?(...r2.fii.......... D Certificate of No Material Effect ~.. Certificate of Appropriateness \.Ø" Major review D Intermediate review D Minor review Applicant Information (Please check primary contact person) a Own.,...ß._\'M.~.__.W¥µ:... Phone .....b"2¡,.I...:::.ß.:~..I..7............................................ Address .....\,...\....l..Q......\&..L~':L...~f).......... uno ..................................................................................................... emaiJ ............................................................................................... D Contractor ........Q:.\t.J..~...................................... Address .......................................................................................... ......................................................................................................... Phone ............................................................................................. email............................................................................................... a Consuítant .............. ................ ............... ............. ............ ...... ..... Address .......................................................................................... ......................................................................................................... Phone ............................................................................................. ..........................................................................................'................ email............................................................................................... Application Requirements Attached are the following items: o Site plan D Floor plans a Buildíng elevatíons D Photographs D Product information D Other ............................................................................ If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs. If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure. please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently describe the scope of the project. Provide a written description of the proposed project on the second page of this application. Property Information Address of property .....~.(2:z.......ß...f?;?..v.J..\J............. .................................................................................................................. Use of property ............~~.................................... Date constructed (if known) ............................................................. Historic Designation o Th!s pl'ðperty !s a loe-al hlstðFle llifiðmark ~h~s;*operty is íocated in the: if Brown Street Historic District D College Green Historic District D East College Street Historic District D Longfellow Historic District o $ymmit Street Hi$tQric;; Diwh;t D Woodlawn Historic District D Clark Street Conservation District D College Hill Conservation District o Dearborn Street Conservation District D Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District Within the district, this property is classified as: ~ontribllting D Noncontributing D Nonhistoric P9*>;ect Type r¡J Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window replacement. skylights, window opening alterations. new decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar) D Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps) D Demolition of a buiiding or portion of a building (ie. porch, chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar) D Construction of new building (J P.epaír or restoradon of an exístíng structure that wíff not change its appearance D Other Project description ......................ß.a~~..c..£:.........~............\J2.~..::...Q£.£\J......tJ..~........W..~...tJJ)..Cl...!IJ..s............... ....................W..r.r.H:.........Q..f£\J..Lt:J.~...........~...~.......W...L\.t!.).a..kJ..~.........Q...ç;;................................. ...................~.......t:\...l.~........$..l·~t·..··ft::e·~~..~·..·..··~...~t..t:1............................. ·...................................un.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..........................................................................................................."..................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... Materials to be used ."Hm=fTT.<Hmm~H"~n.nwm'mm7mmm.mn'm.wm. mmnumumm,mllmm,u"ummmm:mnrmmmwn'rmmnmm,mmuuu.",nnmumumnfimmum,mmU ...............................\...~~........il.J:~#.?:DM.........lI.~...~..~'i)·.a..~·.$.·....·..·..t..·S~.......~~... S-f e~S) .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ./ .~...~.....~.................................................~...~..................................................~...................................................~~.......................u.................................................................~........... ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .....................~...........................~.................................................................................~...........~.................................................................................~...............................~.............. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Exteriór ãppeäränce Chä"geš ...................................................".......-..................................................................................................................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................................."....................................~..........................~.......................................................~.................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ppdadmlHP HandbooklApp.p65 ",., ,,,,,~,,,,,,'., """.' ",',d,__' """"."""_,,,,,,'M," ",,,',",,,,,.,",,,.,,, ."".,,,^'._,,,.,'.'",,,,,',,',,, "W,'", ,',,' "',,,--',"''''','' ,--"",'"" '"''''''''--''''''----'''''',1''''',',-,''' '''',,'' "-'"'''' ",,,' . , ~ c ~ ~ '~ , ,--, GUEST: , "%"""",,p/ ._~ '" ,,~- -~_.~~~.^"~~~"",~'_"",,,",,w=," ",' IWiii"'&M'I""~"~{(m"'" " ·,.,V "'''''''''''i"~''»''i~'',, ,u"," ""fJw:r 'Wh''''' " " / '",,,,,,yf MENARDS QUOTE 1375HWY 1 WEST IOWA CITY, IA 52246 Phone: (319) 358-9708 Fax: (319) 358-9828 Store Number: 3091 Store Code: IOWA DATE: 07/15/2005 TEAM MEMBER: I ITEM & SIZES LOCA TIONITAG # 0001 Qty. = 2 CT Size = 3' 4" W x 5' 6" H UD Size = 3' 715/16"W x 5' 8 5/8" H RO Size = 3' 6 1/2" W x 5' 85/8" H .... , Quote # 000287 , PRODUCT DESCRIPTIO,N UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE *** SALE PRICE VALID THROUGH JULY 20, 2005 *** 3456 Select Primed Double Hung standard Configuration: 1 Wide 1 High Exterior Finish: Primed Egress: Egress Size Interior Material: Pine Interior Finish: None Glazing: Clear Insulated Tempered Glass: No Air Space Option: Argon Filled Grille Position: No Grille(s) Hardware Type: Integral Plow Hardware Finish: Copper JambUner Color: White Screen: Fiberglass Screen Color: White Screens Shipped Loose: Yes Extension Jamb: 4 9/16" Extension Jamb Material: Pine Jamb Jacks: No Brickmould Type: No Brickmould Subsill:Yes Subsill Shipped Loose: No Base Price Clear Insulated Argon Filled Add-on White Fiberglass Screen(s) Screen(s) Shipped Loose Charge White Jamb Liner Add-on $ $ $ $ $ $ 218.24 3.32 15.47 3.32 5.53 $ 245.88 491.76 Page 1 Of 2 SmartQuote Version 1.0118M Staff Report Historic Review for 422 Brown Street District: Brown Street Historic District Classification: Contributing ]uly21,2005 Applicant, Richard Wayne, is requesting approval of Certificate of Appropriateness for proposed alterations at 422 Brown Street, a contributing property in the Brown Street Historic District. This application presents a revised proposal of window installation presented in the meeting held on June 30, 2005. Proposed work includes of replacement inoperable window openings with operable double hung windows on the south façade of the enclosed porch. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Guidelines for Alterations 4.7 Windows Recommended: Replacement windows · Replacing badly deteriorated windows with new ones that match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of divided- lights, and overall appearance of the historic windows. · Using new wood windows and sashes, if necessary, to replace historic wood windows and sashes. The use of metal- clad, solid-wood windows is acceptable. Replacement windows and trim must accept paint. Divided-lights may be created with muntins bars that are adhered to both sides of the glass, but not with snap-in muntin bars. · Replacing a bedroom window, if required for egress by the Building Code, with a new one that matches the size, trim, use of divided-lights, and overall appearance of the previous bedroom window or other windows in the house. New windows · Adding windows that match the type, proportions, trim, and appearance of the historic windows. The sash width must be similar to that of the original windows. · Adding new windows in a location that is consistent with the window pattern of the historic building or buildings of similar architectural style. Disallowed: New and replacement windows · Installing modern types of windows including sliding, awning, casement, and bay windows when they were not original to the building, consistent with the architectural style, or required for egress. · Installing metal, vinyl clad or vinyl windows when they were not original to the building. · Using snap-in muntin bars to achieve the appearance of divided-lights. Staff Comments Proposed windows are required to meet egress regulations as the enclosed porch is converted into habitable rooms. In the previous meeting the Commission approved installation of double hung windows on the east and west facades. The staff had suggested designing the fenestration such that this would reflect a look of the enclosed porch. In the revised proposal the applicant intends to install a double hung window in each room by replacing the in operable windows. Recommendations Staff recommends approval of Certificate of Appropriateness, provided that the proposed window openings are of the same opening size of the existing inoperable window and appropriate trim is used. MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 14, 2005 -7:00 P.M. EMMA J. HARVAT HALL DRAFT MEMBERS PRESENT: Richard Carlson, Michael Gunn, Michael Maharry, Mark McCallum, Justin Pardekooper, Jim Ponto, Tim Weitzel MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Brennan, James Enloe, Jan Weissmiller STAFF PRESENT: Sunil Terdalkar OTHERS PRESENT: Dave Brost, Jr.; Dave Brost, Sr.; Helen Burford; Kerry DeArmand; Pat Farrant; Sue Kemp; Bob Orend; John Roffman; Walter Seaman; Contractor for 420 South Lucas Street (no name given), hereafter referred to as "Contractor" CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Weitzel called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION: Certificates of Appropriateness: 503 Melrose Avenue: Terdalkar said that this is an Iowa City landmark property. He said the proposed work is for the replacement of wood decking, replacement of gutters and downspouts, and replacement of the screens on the porch. Terdalkar said the goal of the applicant is not to change the exterior appearance. He said the drawings also show addition of parking spaces to the south of existing lot. Orend, representing the church, introduced his consultants, Dave Brost, Sr.; and Dave Brost, Jr.; and Kerry DeArmand of Merit Construction. Orend said the church has decided not to replace any of the deck or the gazebo, due to costs. He said the church is going to restore the brick and do tuckpointing. Orend referred to his updated plans since they were submitted to the Commission. He said that this work would be done in 2006, but the church wanted to make certain it had preliminary approval for the plans. Weitzel asked what length of time a building permit remains effective for. Terdalkar said it is between six months and a year. Gunn said that the church is not obligated to obtain a building permit right away, even if the Commission issues a Certificate of Appropriateness now. Brost, Sr. said that between himself and Merit Construction, they developed a budget for the renovation of this institution. He said the church has to apply for funds in June so that the funding will be received in January. Brost, Sr. said the church will be doing the tuckpointing of the masonry, the brick and the stone, this year. He said the church is taking bids on this work until August 4th. Brost, Sr. said that the [porch] columns and railing would be done right after the first of the year. Regarding outside work, he said the church would like to add eight parking spaces to the end of the parking at the south end of the lot. Brost, Sr. said there is a wood fence on the west end that the church would like to replace exactly as it is now. He said the church also plans to replace the roof of the gazebo because the shingles are in bad shape, and it will be replaced exactly as it is now. Brost, Sr. said the church will be painting all the exterior soffits and the wood windows to match the current color. He added that the skylights over the interior space will be replaced. He said they are steel but will probably be replaced with something better. Brost, Sr. said they would be the same configuration and the same type of glass. Weitzel asked when the skylights were added to the building. Orend was uncertain. Weitzel said he believes that is an addition of later date on that side. Orend asked if a permit is required to do the tuckpointing. Weitzel said he believes that a permit is not needed, as it is masonry repair. Terdalkar said that generally if there are no structural changes, a permit is not required. Weitzel suggested asking HIS to be certain. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 2 Brost, Sr. asked if there are any specific requirements for tuckpointing. Weitzel said the Commission recommends using the least aggressive means of removing the mortar. He said the Commission would recommend that a carbide blade and saw not be used but recommends using a chisel or something else to carefully remove the mortar. Weitzel said this will be soft, mud brick, and it will be very delicate. He said that as carefully as possible, the existing should be removed and then repaired with a like mortar, a very soft mortar, not a commercial mortar. Weitzel said that the Secretary of Interior's Standards provide more information, and the National Park Service has published technical briefs to describe the process. Weitzel said the masonry should be tooled the same way that it is now. Gunn said he recalled that tuckpointing requires a building permit. He said that if it does require a permit, then there are some disallowed items: sandblasting, water blasting, hard mortar, painting or sealing the masonry. Weitzel said the main problem occurs when someone who is used to working with modern, really hard, dense, high fire brick goes in and treats this with a coarse cement mortar in there and tears up the brick. Brost, Sr. said he has a pre-bid meeting with the contractors, and he will emphasize this at the meeting. Gunn asked about the review process for addition of spaces to the parking lot. Terdalkar said the Board of Adjustment will review it when requested for approval as a special exception, because this is a religious institution. He said the Board may ask for recommendations from the Historic Preservation Commission. Gunn said the Commission is looking at this application with regard to the tuckpointing, the parking, and the skylights. Maharry said the notes on the drawings refer to replacing the wood railings with composite type railings of the same design. Brost, Sr. said that the reference to composite material should have been scratched. Maharry said that repairs to gutters and downspouts do not require a permit. Weitzel said the Commission has recommendations for gutters and downspouts. He said that the built-in gutters must be left in place; a building permit is not required for replacing or repairing external gutters. Maharry asked if the wood shingle roof would be replaced with similar wood. Brost, Sr. confirmed this and said the replacement would just be on the gazebo. Maharry said the skylights, when looked at from straight on, tend to disappear quite well because of their dark color. Gunn said the Commission could recommend using a dark color for the skylights. Weitzel said the Commission has some guidelines for skylights, but there are mostly recommendations and a disallowance for the new installation of skylights on significant, prominent, historic parts of the building. He said, however, that these skylights are already there so that they can be replaced. MOTION: Gunn moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for 503 Melrose Avenue for the tuckpointing, following Section 4.2 of the guidelines; parking as submitted; replacement of the skylights with the recommendation of a dark color, bronze or gray, to blend in with the roof; and, if a permit is required for replacement of the gazebo shingles, replacement of the wood shingles with new wood shingles of a similar design. McCallum seconded the motion. Carlson said he did not really have a strong opinion regarding the parking. He said it is nice to have a yard, but this doesn't seem to be taking too much of the yard. Weitzel said that he thinks allowances should be made for an institutional use. Carlson said he would be in favor of that. Gunn said if this involved a retaining wall or something else, he might be concerned, but this is just an extension of the existing lot. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. 906 East ColleQe Street. Terdalkar stated that this is a key-contributing property in the College Green Conservation District. He said the proposal is to replace the front stairs and railing. Terdalkar said that the proposed materials for the replacement of the stairs are Trex, a composite material, and fiber cement board, and metal pipe for rails. Weitzel said that Trex is not yet an approved material for the Commission, so it will need to be discussed. Roffman said that he is the contractor for the project, and he introduced Kemp, a member of the sorority's board. Roffman distributed a sample of the Trex composite. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 3 Roffman said the sorority has around 55 occupants, and this is the primary entrance to the building. He said that slipperiness is a major issue for both the steps and the porch, and fall protection is a major concern. Roffman said he plans to get rid of the bunkers on either side of the steps, extend the steps out past the outside of the inner columns, and start the railing on the inside of the column to flare on out to the outside of the steps. He said this would also allow more expansive stairs. Roffman said this would replace an eyesore with something that is functional, safe, and easy to maintain. He said the risers would be of fiber cement board and would be painted like the rest of the railing. Roffman said the step itself would be the Trex product. Weitzel pointed out that the low sidewalls were built around 1983 and are therefore not original to the house. He said they are concrete wrapped with plywood. Weitzel stated that the Commission approved a ramp for this house for access of supplies on the east side near the rear a couple of years ago, and the ramp did have Trex in it. He said the Design Review Subcommittee (DRS) did not find anything with the proposal that was specifically outside the guidelines, except for the new material. Maharry pointed out that the plan approved two years ago used the same material. Weitzel said it was used on a side elevation and on a ramp that is removable, so it was somewhat different. Maharry said that the stairs could be considered removable. Roffman said that what will be seen on the stairs will be fiber cement board, and the flat plane itself will be made of Trex. McCallum asked, regarding the material being so far unapproved, if it could be added to the approved list or if it is unapproved because of national historical standards. Weitzel said the Commission just hasn't looked at it before, and the guidelines require that anything new that is a substitute for wood or a similar, historic material has to be approved prior to its use. He said the Trex is a composite of plastic and wood: polyethylene and sawdust. Weitzel said the material is not vinyl. He said it is actually millable, just like wood; it can be routed and drilled. Weitzel said he thought it could also be painted. Terdalkar displayed the product website, and Weitzel read that it readily accepts paint or stain, although neither is required. Pardekooper said that this is a very good product, and he has used it a lot. He said if he had his choice between Trex and green treated or another painted wood, he would choose the Trex any day. Pardekooper said, however, that it is really about whether the Commission views this as an appropriate material. Carlson read from under the 'Disallowed' column under Wood and then Wood Substitutes, "Substituting a material in place of wood that does not retain the appearance, function, and paintability of the original wood." He said the Commission probably has to determine that this is paintable, in addition to appearing to be like wood, which it probably would from a distance. Weitzel said that unlike other plastic materials, this is not that slippery, shiny, glossy stuff. Ponto referred to the website display showing the evaluation of the material by paint companies. He said this is pretty good evidence that the product will accept paint. Weitzel said the Commission could consider allowing it for specific locations, such as for decks but not sides of houses. Maharry said it is essentially recycled material and is a worthy product. Burford asked if this product is similar to Tendura, which is a composite material that was approved by the Secretary of the Interior. Gunn said that this application would just approve the product for the stairs. He said that this is not a historic porch floor. Pardekooper said that this would just be used on the tread. Gunn said he thought the Trex would be fine for this project, but he did not want to see every historic porch with six-inch wide, round-edged decks. MOTION: Maharry moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the proposed project at 906 East College Street, with the recommendation that the Trex material used for the stair treads be of a Winchester gray color. Pardekooper seconded the motion. Weitzel said that approval of this motion would make implicit the Commission's acceptance of Trex on stair treads. Maharry said that, in his opinion, this would be similar to what the Commission approved a few years Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 4 ago in that the stairs would be fairly removable if someone wanted to do so in the future. Roffman said that, actually, the treads could just be replaced if someone wanted to do so. Carlson said it is important for the Commission to be explicit in the minutes that approval of this would just apply to stair treads and nothing else at this point. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. 1050 Woodlawn Avenue. Terdalkar said that this house is a non-contributing structure in the Woodlawn Historic District. He said that proposed work includes the addition of a room and patio on the basement level; a sunroom and screened porch at the first floor level; and a wood ramp as an entry way with a deck, and removal, replacement, and/or installation of new windows and doors. Farrant, the owner of the house, said that not much of the intervention would be visible, as most of the work to be done would be interior work. She said that this is a non-conforming house and is the "orphan child" on Woodlawn. Weitzel stated that Sue Licht, the architect, discussed this project during the Design Review Subcommittee (DRS) meeting. He said that Licht's concerns with doing anything but a simple ramp to the accessory door would be the potential cost. Weitzel said that the ramp, door, and window replacement did not get into the original application. He said the proposal is to remove the window, fill it in with material from the planter, and add a door. Weitzel said that this structure is a 1950s ranch but is an architect-designed ranch. He said that it has very strong horizontal architectural features and integral planters and corner windows, which were part of that time period, as well as broad eaves and bow hipped roofs. Farrant said that the carport on the original plans for the house was never finished. She said that is why there are now stairs that go nowhere. Weitzel said then that the area for the door, window, and ramp is original to the house. Farrant said that is true as far as she knows. Weitzel said there are several issues to discuss. He stated that the DRS did not see anything that was specifically out of alignment with the guidelines but did discuss whether the planter was an integral, significant part of the house or whether the window is a significant, determining feature of the house. Farrant said that replacing the window with the door is integral to the plans. She said that this is a small, two- bedroom house. Farrant said that what was planned to be a carport is wasted space, as it is tagged onto the kitchen and is not very warm because it is on a slab. She said the goal is to make an entrance there to a utility room so that part of the kitchen would be more valuable space. Weitzel said Licht had pointed out that for the most part on the house, the windows are vinyl replacements from some time in the last ten years, except for the windows on the back, which are very large, set picture windows. Farrant said that most of the windows are original, which is one of the problems. She said the original windows have lost their seals. Farrant said that there are only two replacement windows and then the large slider. She stated that the original windows have deteriorated and will all be replaced. MOTION: Maharry moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 1050 Woodlawn Avenue, as proposed, based on the facts that it doesn't further detract from the historic district, it doesn't create a false sense of historic character, and it is compatible with the style and character of the non-historic property. Maharry said this is a non-historic property because it was less than 50 years old when the Woodlawn Historic District was designated. Ponto read from page four of the guidelines, "Non-historic buildings are buildings constructed after a district's period of significance and were less than 50 years old at the time the district was designated." Weitzel said the map lists the property as non-contributing. Gunn said that no one on the Commission thinks this property is contributing. He said that whether or not this is historic is still debatable, but in this case it may not matter. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 5 McCallum seconded the motion. Weitzel said that the points made in Maharry's motion are valid. He said it does not change the district to change this one particular house, as long as it is not such a horrifying ugly obstruction to the rest of the neighborhood that it becomes obvious. Carlson said that, in terms of design, he said he thinks it a little odd to have one wall plane with stone on one side and wood lapped siding on the other. He said that is the only stylistic thing that he might question about the proposed addition. Gunn said that he is comfortable with this application and would be in favor of approving it. The motion carried on a vote of 6-1. with Carlson votina no. 426 Grant Street. Terdalkar stated that this is a contributing structure in the Longfellow Historic District. He said the application is to install pipe railing for safety. Weitzel reminded the Commission that any steps that are over four risers high have to have a safety railing by code. Seaman said he plans to install a simple, black pipe railing. He stated that the wrought iron railing that he previously requested was disapproved by the Commission several weeks ago. MOTION: McCallum moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness to allow a simple pipe railing at 426 Grant Street. Maharry seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. 420 South Lucas Street. Terdalkar said that this is a contributing structure in the Lucas Governor Conservation District. He stated that the application is to replace the roof on both structures on the property. Terdalkar said the house in the rear has metal roof. He said the certificate of appropriateness requirement was triggered because this is a multi-family structure. Weitzel said that the owners of the property received some misinformation. He said the owner called and found out that a permit was not needed to redo the roof of what was assumed to be a single-family house. Weitzel said it was then determined that this is a multi-family house so that a permit was required. He said that half the work was done by that point. Contractor said that he looked as the association guidelines and paperwork, but it never mentions roofing, although it mentions windows, siding, etc. Weitzel said that apparently a permit is now required for roofing a multi-family structure. Contractor stated that anything with more than two units requires a permit. Contractor said the rear building has a lot of rust problems. He said the front building is asphalt-shingled. Contractor said the buildings are sided alike, and the owners would like to have them shingled alike. He said the owners want to use architectural shingles to make the buildings look better. Weitzel said the DRS agreed that the existing roof is damaged. He said it is not something the Commission usually covers in the guidelines, except the original material for the house, which is wood shingles, is recommended. Weitzel said the DRS would accept asphalt shingles that look like wood shingles as a substitute. He said the application states that weathered wood is the color, so that would match well with the weathered shingles. Weitzel said that the DRS recommends approval. MOTION: Ponto moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the roofing project at 420 South Lucas Street, as proposed. McCallum seconded the motion. Gunn said the guidelines are not clear about whether or not it is okay to tear off one of these metal roofs that was added on on top of a saw and shingle roof and put back on asphalt shingles. He said that at times the Commission has thought it was acceptable, and other times the Commission has thought it was not acceptable. Gunn said he feels it is probably better to tear off an unoriginal, metal roof and put on good asphalt shingles, as opposed to requiring the reinstallation of a metal roof, which is not original anyway. Weitzel said that because this is a deteriorated [as per the applicant], non-functioning component of the house, the Commission will allow it to be replaced; whereas a perfectly intact roof might require more discussion. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 6 The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. Contractor recommended that it be added to the paperwork [guidelines] that this type of project needs to be brought to the Commission. Minutes for June 30. 2005. Because there were no amendments to the Commission's June 30, 2005 minutes, Weitzel said they would be filed as written. OTHER: Terdalkar stated that the owners of 422 Brown Street want to use two of the four existing non-operable windows on the front porch for egress. He said the owners contacted him to enquire about this revised proposal after a certificate was issued for window installation on the east and west facades as approved by the Commission in the previous meeting. Gunn said he does not really like that idea and that the outside windows of the pairs would then not match the inside windows of the pairs. He said it is actually better and probably no more expensive to put the egress windows on the sides of the porch, because on the front, the owner will mess up one window trying to get the other one out. Weitzel asked Terdalkar to let the owners know that the Commission is leaning toward not approving such a change. Maharryasked if an appeal to the Board of Adjustment has been made regarding the denial of vinyl siding for 946 Iowa Avenue. Terdalkar said that he has not yet received any appeal. Maharry stated that last year the Commission approved a porch reconstruction for a building on the corner of Dodge and Washington. He said the skirting was part of that approval. Maharry said the skirting has not yet been done after one year and is therefore not in compliance with the certificate of appropriateness. Weitzel said the Commission can ask HIS to inspect the property and issue a citation. Maharry suggested that a friendly letter be sent first to remind the owner of his obligation to complete the project and, failing that, that HIS be contacted. Pardekooper said there may be some litigation with regard to that property and also suggested sending a friendly letter. Weitzel asked Terdalkar to look into the matter. McCallum distributed a letter to the Commission. He said that while he is not directing his comments to Terdalkar, he said he expected a little more from planning staff regarding an interactive process between the Commission and planning staff regarding the zoning code rewrite. McCallum said that the zoning code hasn't been submitted to the City Council yet so that the hearing process for the Planning and Zoning Commission to receive feedback is not yet closed. McCallum said that recognizing that he may be the only advocate on the Commission for these changes like what he is calling "the Des Moines model," he is a little frustrated when there is an attempt to not even discuss it. He said that he has the impression that the attempt at stifling debate is not coming from anyone on the Commission, it is coming from planning staff. McCallum said the City website lists the job description of Commission members as making recommendations to zoning. He said it is appropriate for the Commission to do that. McCallum said he was disappointed with what Planning had presented with regard to historic preservation and was expecting more of a consultative type thing. He said he wants to dialogue with representatives of the Planning and Zoning Commission and Planning staff. McCallum said the hearing is not over until the City Council votes. Maharry said the history of how things work with City government shows that people don't show up at the Historic Preservation Commission meetings, they don't show up at the Planning and Zoning Commission meetings, but they show up at the City Council meetings. He said he thought that people would line up when it gets to the City Council level and say that's great, but this is what else I would like to do. Maharry said a strategy would be for McCallum to go to pro-preservation City Council members, possibly Regenia Bailey and/or Bob Elliott or others, and have them advocate for his proposal. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 7 Weitzel asked Maharry if he recalled discussing what was going on with the new zoning code at a Commission meeting. Maharry said the Commission didn't discuss everything that was or wasn't going to affect historic preservation. McCallum said that Shelley McCafferty discussed this briefly and alluded that there would be more feedback later. McCallum said the zoning code revision is only done every 20 years, so there should be open dialogue between the citizens and the government regarding how we want to shape the community. He said he did not see much progressiveness in the proposed zoning code. McCallum said he is just asking to hold the local government accountable. He said he would like to have a dialogue. McCallum said his idea is just one of many that could be out there that might answer some questions and issues. He said he did not feel that the Commission has been engaged to address the part of the zoning code that it is concerned with. Gunn asked whether the Commission has formally discussed McCallum's ideas and made a recommendation. He asked if it was discussed at a meeting when he was not present. He asked whether the Historic Preservation Commission has taken a position on McCallum's zoning incentive ideas. Weitzel stated that the Commission has not taken a position on it or discussed it formally. Gunn stated that since the Historic Preservation Commission has not discussed these ideas or taken a position that planning staff cannot be blamed for ignoring the Commission. He asked if the Commission was planning to discuss McCallum's ideas at tonight's meeting. Commission agreed to a discussion of these ideas. McCallum said that the Des Moines model is for all historic districts, but he modified it to just include primarily multi-family zones in historic and conservation districts. He said it would therefore primarily include the College Green District, the College Hill Conservation District, and the Lucas Governor Conservation District but would exempt the single-family residential zones in College Hill. McCallum said he could see this having the most dramatic effect in the College Hill Conservation District. He stated that Iowa Avenue could be an area of opportunity for this type of thing. McCallum said he defines this as multi-family zones only, in historic districts. He said it would therefore apply to RNC-20 and RM-44 zones. McCallum said that if this displaced anything, it would be rooming houses and that type of activity. He said that what he would really like to see is the creation of a balance in these neighborhoods. McCallum said that because this is an owner/occupied type zoning model, there won't be hundreds of people rushing in to do this. He said it will be specific types of people who are generally not attracted to the downtown area but are looking for something unique. McCallum said that this is really the Peninsula Model in a historic district. Maharry pointed out that the way this is worded geographically, it would favor McCallum geographically, because he is there. He asked McCallum how he would get away from people pointing out that this is proposed by someone who will be affected by it. McCallum said he is something of an advocate, so he would express that bias. Maharry said there will be the impression that this is creating a City policy to suit one person. Burford asked about the potential for defining the boundaries a little differently. She said there are some older buildings that are endangered around the courthouse and down to the railroad tracks. Burford asked if this could be defined to include the new perimeters of the ever-expanding downtown area to include those areas and make it a much more flexible community. McCallum said those are primarily multi-family zones, but they are not in historic districts. Weitzel said it might be just as good to include these other areas, because it would still be an incentive for people to use old buildings to keep them intact, rather than tearing them down. He said that a lot of the designated districts are in smaller zones. McCallum said he restricted this to the historic and conservation districts based on anticipated resistance, to say that the City could try it here first. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 8 Gunn said he thinks there would be a lot of resistance to this. He said he was on the Commission during four rezonings, and the whole pitch was that preservation works best when the underlying zoning is consistent with the architecture one is trying to preserve. Gunn said that almost everything this concerns is single-family residences. He said that is the way they were built, and if was a single-family zone, then it would be easier to preserve those districts if it was consistent with single-family dwellings. Gunn said this proposes something that is against the built historic properties. McCallum said that what he is talking about is a live-work concept. He said it is an owner-occupied type business, where one could live upstairs and have a business on the main floor. Weitzel pointed out that a cottage industry is permissible in the RS-8 zone anyway. Maharry said that the type of businesses described are the ones that are open from ten to five. He said they seem to be non-intrusive type businesses. Maharry said that Gunn has a good point about the original use but said that a large percentage of houses is now being used as rentals and not for the original use. He said he would rather have the house be a business than a rental, because then owners will put money into it a little bit more. McCallum said he thinks that the City is ripe for this. He said that a review process could also be incorporated into this so that there is some balance, and it could be more site specific as to whether the business is appropriate to each building setting. Maharry said that doing this on a case-by-case basis would lead toward a potential "playing favorites" bias. He said the Commission has guidelines that are published for everyone to see, and putting guidelines into this idea would be helpful. Maharry said part of the reason staff is reluctant to look at this is that if this went forward, staff would have to think about ramifications. McCallum said if the Commission endorses something, then it would go to the next level, and there would be a lot of hashing out and so forth. Maharry stated that what has gone forward to City Council has been pored over by the lawyers, and this has not been. McCallum said the attorneys have worked this out for the Peninsula Project. Pardekooper asked if there were any examples, besides the Peninsula, of this idea. He said that the Peninsula Project is not working well. Pardekooper asked if there is a good example of an owner-occupied business that actually works well. Pardekooper said that he thinks this is a good idea, but one needs to consider everything that will be brought against it. He said it will be asked if these neighborhoods will be able to support the overflow traffic associated with these businesses. McCallum said that these are primarily multi-family zones. He said that mostly college students live in these areas, with few exceptions. Weitzel said that Commission members are not necessarily against the idea but said that there are real issues here that need to be discussed. McCallum said that is why he brought up having an interaction with planning professionals and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Weitzel said that Karen Howard has pointed out that any time after the zoning code goes through, there will continue to be modifications made to it. Weitzel said that perhaps the Commission needs to work on this but not insist that it happen this year and then develop it over a longer term. McCallum said he is just asking to meet with planning staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Weitzel said that they are so busy with everything else right now that they may be resistant to this. McCallum said that they are the ones pushing this before the City Council and saying that public comment has to occur now. Weitzel stated that code review is something that happens periodically. Terdalkar said that there will be another review for amendments, and citizens can still go before the Planning and Zoning Commission, which is still getting comments. Maharry said the other proposal to eliminate what happened on Iowa Avenue, where a bungalow was torn down to make two five-bedroom apartments, and the fact that the zoning code does not change or even address that is more important. He said that could continue to happen throughout the north side, and there is nothing the Commission could do about it. Weitzel said that might be more of an issue right now, even though rebuilding the infrastructure and the interior of the City is a good idea. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 9 McCallum stated that the public hearing is right now, and there is a dialogue going on. He asked if the Commission is going to be part of that dialogue and be interactive as a Commission. McCallum said that apparently the answer from planning is no, and he is disappointed in that. Gunn said that basically, everything the Commission does is in its guidelines; the rest of the code is just procedural. He said McCallum is talking about zoning and is asking the Commission to change rather dramatically what it does. Gunn said that is okay, but McCallum is asking for some pretty significant changes from the Commission's perspective, because everything the Commission has done is by landmark or by district. Gunn said that when a landmark is designated, it is pretty clear, but when a district is designated, the guidelines are written, and that is what the Commission has; the guidelines that it writes. He said that McCallum is now asking the Commission to somehow become zoning people, changing the underlying zoning, rather than doing what it has done in the past. Gunn said this involves an entire new area, and that's fine if the Commission is strongly behind it, but it would definitely be a change in what the Commission is doing. Burford said that the house on the corner of Church Street and Linn Street was demolished for a parking lot. She said there was nothing anywhere to say that the house should be saved. Gunn said the Commission knew about it but had no say, because the property was not a landmark and was not in a district. McCallum said that zoning affects what the Commission does in the sense that it dictates what is going on in the marketplace. Maharry said that McCallum obviously proposed this because he believes it is pro- preservation and will encourage people to keep up their structures. He said that the other way the market could go is if the market drops out of the rental business, people might fix these houses up to be single- family homes again, and that might be the Commission's first priority. Weitzel asked if there is a demand for this type of thing and if people will really take advantage of it. He said that right now this can be done in the RS-8 zone, but there tends not to be too many because of parking requirements. Maharry said that currently, if someone wants to have an owner-occupied business, he can apply for a special exception. McCallum said he believed that the only special exceptions that are allowed are the ones that are defined in the code and specified as a special exception use for the particular zone. Weitzel said that the new code is going away from those rote lists and trying to make it more general so that creative things can be done. He said that using the special exception standards, a lot of what McCallum has proposed would be allowed by the new code. Weitzel said that the special exception language is pretty broad. Pardekooper suggested asking Karen Howard or other planning staff to come to a Commission meeting so that members can ask specific questions. McCallum said that what he really wants is a dialogue with planning staff and someone from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Maharry asked McCallum if he has attended a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Maharry replied that he has attended the meetings and has presented two proposals and now has this one in front of the Historic Preservation Commission. Weitzel said that the Historic Preservation Commission doesn't do zoning and doesn't know zoning and does not have experts in that. McCallum said that is why he would like to have a meeting. Weitzel said that McCallum has brought up issues that are broader than historic preservation and that are probably applicable to multiple zones throughout the City. He said that makes it difficult for the Commission to be the group that says something has to be done. Maharry agreed that the Commission's main consideration should be whether something will help historic preservation in Iowa City. Weitzel said that McCallum's ideas have a lot of merit and he should pursue them, but the Commission is not the forum for them. McCallum said the Commission's job description on the website says that the Commission should be interacting with other commissions, where appropriate. He said that the zoning code is rewritten once in twenty years and has applications to what happens to historic structures in the City. Weitzel said that the phrase "where appropriate" is the issue here, which the Commission will have to decide, and he would offer that it is not in this case. Historic Preservation Commission Minutes July 14, 2005 Page 10 Maharry asked if the Commission wanted to consider sending a letter to the Planning and Zoning Commission stating that the Commission did not feel like it had a chance to add to the zoning code. Weitzel agreed that would be appropriate if the Commission had specific proposals to discuss. Gunn said that it is good that McCallum is putting these ideas forward, but he did not hear the Commission behind this. He suggested that McCallum propose this as a citizen and as an informed person. Gunn said that he would not be on the bandwagon with this proposal. McCallum said that he appreciated the input but added that there was not a formal presentation or discussion by planning staff of what was going forward. Weitzel said there were four or five public forums for discussion of the zoning code. He said that staff did not go discuss it with every commission, however. Terdalkar said there was a presentation in April, relating to historic preservation issues only, and only ten people came to the presentation. McCallum asked if the Commission felt inclined to ask for a meeting with representatives from the Planning and Zoning Commission to talk about these types of things. Maharry said that he felt that at any time the Commission could go to the Planning and Zoning Commission when the consensus is to ask for change. He said that if the Commission has voted on something and feels it is important to change the code, the Commission could put together a presentation for the Planning and Zoning Commission. Weitzel recommended that the Commission organize its ideas into a presentation. He said that McCallum would need to be willing to have the Commission take his idea and let everyone have input. McCallum said he agreed. He asked if there was a consensus for the Commission to meet with the Planning and Zoning Commission at the time it is rewriting the code. Weitzel stated that the planning staff has said that zoning code revisions are always on the table. Maharry said that the preservation awards would be held on Wednesday, August 3rd at 5:30 in Meeting Room A of the library. He asked for volunteers to help with replenishing refreshments, and Weitzel and Ponto volunteered. Ponto said, regarding the roof situation, the Secretary of the Interior Standards recommend maintaining roof material: slate, wood, clay, tile and metal and so on, and not recommended is stripping the roof of sound historic material such as slate, clay, tile, wood, or architectural metal. He said the important point is that the metal roof was not original. Terdalkar displayed an e-mail regarding a house on Lucas Street and whether or not their home had been designated a landmark. He said that it was the summer house of General Hoxie, who was an Army Corps Engineer with his wife Vinnie Reams, who was the sculptor for the bust of Abraham Lincoln in the US Congress. Weitzel asked if the Elizabeth Tate house at 914 South Dubuque has been named a landmark. He said that the curator of the Johnson County Historical Society has said that the building should be a landmark, because of the significance of Elizabeth Tate. Terdalkar said that the structure is a multi-family conversion. Regarding the Hoxie/Reams house, Weitzel asked Carlson for an opinion as to how much alteration would be too much. Gunn said that the porch on the house is gone, it has been sided, and the front stairs are different. Weitzel asked if anyone would be interested in working on the landmark designations for these houses. Carlson said he could work on the designations but could not do so right away. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte s:/pcd/minuteslHPC/2005/07 -14-05.doc July 19, 2005 City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Karen Howard - Associate Planner Re: Zoning Code Rewrite Project Planning staff recently received a copy of a memo sent to the Historic Preservation Commission from Mark McCallum. In the memo Mr. McCallum discussed the drafting and review process for the zoning code rewrite project. There were a number of statements made in the memo that warrant clarification. Mr. McCallum states that planning staff is discouraging input from the Historic Preservation Commission and implies that there has been little input from the Commission with regard to the changes in the historic preservation regulations within the proposed Zoning Code. We were surprised at his remarks given that the original ideas and draft of the preservation section of the Code were initiated by the Historic Preservation Commission and drafted by the Historic Preservation Planner at the time, Shelley McCafferty. From my understanding, the goals that the Historic Preservation Commission were trying to achieve at the time this section was drafted were as follows: · General clean-up of the text of the preservation section of the Code, carefully cross- referencing the newly drafted Preservation Handbook. · Adding maps of all the conservation and historic districts in the zoning code, so it is easier for the public to determine when and where the regulations apply. · Adding a new section to prevent demolition by neglect. · Adding a new section to address cases of "economic hardship." · Increasing the penalties for violations of the historic preservation regulations. In addition, staff recommended inclusion of the following zoning incentives: · Expanding the historic preservation exceptions to allow modifications to the underlying zoning requirements and dimensional standards to facilitate rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic structures in all zoning districts in the City (currently, there is only an exception in the RM-12 Zone). · Creating a new historic preservation exception to allow historic buildings to be converted to a variety of land uses not otherwise allowed in the base zone. Going back through the minutes it appears that the zoning code rewrite was discussed at a number of Historic Preservation Commission meetings, particularly with regard to coordination with the new Preservation Handbook and the goals mentioned above. Once Ms. McCafferty completed a preliminary draft, it was reviewed by other staff from the Planning Department, the Department of Housing and Inspections Services, and the City Attorney's Office. Other than structural and editorial changes, no substantive changes were made to this draft. It was forwarded back to the Historic Preservation Commission in its entirety in August of 2004 for your review. It was our understanding that the Commission discussed and had no objections to the draft at that time. It was also forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission in August of 2004. Since that time, staff has received no requests to meet with the Historic Preservation Commission, nor have we received any formal comments or objections from the Commission regarding the proposed draft. Planning staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission were under the impression that the Historic Preservation Commission had reviewed and were in support of these amendments. Mr. McCallum attended the first Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on April 28 and at that time requested changes to the special exception criteria for historic properties. The Planning and Zoning Commission discussed these requests at their work session on May 23 and directed staff to draft an amendment to this effect for their review and approval at the second public hearing on June 27, at which time the amendment was approved. Mr. McCallum attended the second public hearing on June 27 and submitted additional requests for amendments to the draft regarding how residential density is calculated in the zoning code and advocating for incentives for smaller handicapped accessible apartment units. We understand that Mr. McCallum has submitted these amendment requests on his own behalf and not as a representative of the Historic Preservation Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a third public hearing later in August regarding final amendment requests, including Mr. McCallum's. Mr. McCallum also sent planning staff a fax in June advocating the creation of additional zoning incentives for historic preservation with a copy of several pages of the Des Moines zoning ordinance attached as an example. It is our understanding that the Historic Preservation Commission has had some initial discussions regarding Mr. McCallum's ideas and has decided not to pursue additional amendments to the zoning code at this time. If in the future the Historic Preservation Commission decides to study the feasibility of additional financial or zoning incentives for historic preservation, planning staff is certainly available to assist in that effort. If and when a concrete proposal for changes to the City Code is formulated, it can be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council for their review and approval. It is not necessary to rush the discussion and analysis of these issues in order to be included in the current zoning code rewrite project. As always, the City Code can be amended at any time in the future, whenever the Commission and the City Council determines that it is necessary or beneficial to do so.