HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-13-2007 Historic Preservation Commission
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, December 13, 2007
City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street
Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:00 p.m.
1. Call to Order
2. Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
3. Items of Consideration
A. Consent Calendar: (Certificates for routine or non-controversial projects)
519 Oakland Avenue
B. Certificate of Appropriateness:
1. 1012 Washington Street (Reconsideration)
2. 521 S. Governor Street
3. 430 Oakland Avenue
4. 2460 S. Gilbert Street
5. 821 Dearborn Street
C. Minutes for October 24, November 1, and November 7, 2007
4. Other
5. Adjourn
Staff Report
December 13, 2007
Historic Review for 519 Oakland Avenue
District: Longfellow Historic District
Classification: Contributing
The applicants, Andrea and Jerry W ooddhead, are requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at
519 Oakland Avenue, a contributing property in the Longfellow Historic District. They are seeking approval
to install two new operable skylights (measuring approximately 39 inches x 21 inches in size) on the north
roof surface of the house.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations
4.4 Mass and Roofline
Staff Comments
The simple front-gabled house was built in c. 1915. Evident from the form, windows and roofline, it appears
that the house was originally built with Craftsmen details, however it has few stylistic details. The broad front
porch has been enclosed and original siding has been covered with synthetic siding at an unknown date.
The applicants are proposing to install two skylights on the north roof surface to enable interior remodel to
use the attic space. Considering roof proftle and the fact that the house is situated on a higher elevation than
the street level, the skylights will not be highly visible from the street. The proposed alterations are consistent
with the guidelines and staff recommends approval.
Application for Historic Review
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or proper-
ties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.
icgov.orgIHPhandbook.
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month.
During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday.
Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Monday the week prior to
the meeting.
~~t~t:~b~~ed .....I.L...?:.1.:0.1.....................
CJ ...certificate of No Material Effect
IiY' Certificate of Appropriateness
CJ Major review
CJ Intermediate review
CJ Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
CJ Owner ...Ar.1'h~ea..~...Je.J..y..y.....Y.Y.~d..\1~
Phone... ....a.3.'il. .::-..3..0../tl.b.. ........ ............. ............... ...... ... ....
Address ......51.~......w..k;t.Y.:1d...A~~.:.........................
........................~.9..WQ......~ry...................................................
email......W.Do.d.he.o.d..a.?..I..Q.(;tvia......Y.:l.e.t..... ..
CJ Contractor ........~e.th.....w.e.n(j.e..Y.:::.....................
Address .................. ... ..... ..... .......... ... .................. ..... .... ... ... .... .........
Phone... .... ..... ..... .... ...... ... ..... .... .......... ......... .... ......... .... ...... .......... ...
email................................................................................................
CJ Consu Itant ... ......... ..... .... .... .......... ........... ....... .............. ......... .....
Address......... ..,.... ..... .................. ..... ......... ..... ................................
Phone ....... ... ....... .... .... ... ....... ...... .., .............. ................................. ...
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
CJ Site plan
CJ Floor plans
CJ Building elevations
. u( Photographs
(jj( Product information
CJ Other.......... ........ .............................. .................... ..........
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently de-
scribe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
Address of property .......~y1.....O'gJs.Lq.t1d.....~y~..t..........
..............................................\.Q.m....GT:j........................................
Use of property..............t.~.~:I.d.e..Y.:\.c..~....................................
Date constructed (if known).................!..'1..?:..9.............................
Historic Designation
CJ This property is a local historic landmark
OR
CJ This property is located in the:
CJ Brown Street Historic District
CJ College Green Historic District
CJ East College Street Historic District
.!.if Longfellow Historic District
CJ Summit Street Historic District
CJ Woodlawn Historic District
CJ Clark Street Conservation District
CJ College Hill Conservation District
CJ Dearborn Street Conservation District
CJ Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
e Contributing
CJ Noncontributing
CJ Nonhistoric
Pr,oject Type
~ Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
CJ Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
CJ Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch.
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
CJ Construction of new building
CJ Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not.
change its appearance
CJ Other ... ............... ... .................. ................. ........... .... ...... ...... ...........
Project description
......................I~.o.........f7.ky..I.\-..1.v..\t.s........:to........k........~.lCL(.c..d........~.........Y.l.(;Y..*\..:;;...~..Y.1j ..... ...si..da... ....1......y. 0 of .
.. ........... ........... ..-:T.~. .~.. .....t..~......::p. .c~.(.t~.....9.f:......CJ/..Y.l....... .~dt:i.c. ........ tC. r.:q .o..c.lJ.M..n5.......p.CDJ~Lt.:., ............................................... I
.... .................... .:J1~7(?........ w.i. JI.... ...~..... .:rlo ...... .o:&U4r.... ...,e(X. k..r.:i f4';'.. ....(,ha<.r.l~........... ......... ...........................................................
Materials to be used
... ........... .... .,. ...IwC'.. ..... ..Ve...I..!J..I.X....... .s.ky.l}.g..l:.Lts..... ..... ..... ... ....... ....... ...... ... ......... ..... ..... ... ............... ...... .... ........................... ........... ........ ...
.............................................Ve..l~......:#.:.....;.+;;......ii........................ .3.J.fL.?.5...'Y.......Q~!.r.:l.a..b.Ie........f(...... ..v.~<I:ili:..1..1~............
. ................. ..... .........................3 ..-g......~.. ...~... ....... .1..... ..?-::........ .......................................... ...................... .............................................................................
Exterior appearance chan
. ...... .... ...... .... ...~Cl.Y.:) e....... .... ...... .......
~;ig;;;.~~,i!}......... \ \.\
.........r.19.t....~.......y.J..'i=I.L~.I.!';......l;~! ..~' : ....
..........(~.....~.k\.g.ti?)........... '.J/ \0'~?
I \
.......................................................0 '\
Iowa City
Historic Preservation Commission
[TaU, 4 \ I) Ii, \'Cl,hingtol1 Street, Iowa
L\, ,';22-10
MEMORANDUM
Date: December 13, 2007
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Sunil Terdalkar, Associate Planner
Re: Reconsideration of an application reviewed at the November 7 meeting (1012 E.
Washington St.)
At your November 7 meeting, the Commission reviewed an application for the demolition of a barn
located at 1012 E. Washington Street. The application was submitted a week after the deadline and
after the packet was mailed. The building official encouraged quick action on the application due to
potential hazardous situation. The regular agenda was amended on Tuesday, November 6 to include
this application. Because of the last minute change, staff contacted the applicants at the phone
number provided in the application and left a voice message on Tuesday November 6, to provide
information about the time and location of the meeting. In regular circumstances a letter is sent the
applicant along with a copy of the agenda and staff report.
After the meeting the applicants informed the staff that they did not receive any notice about the
meeting and submitted an appeal letter. Considering the situation staff recommends that the
Commission should reconsider the application.
In the appeal letter the applicants also mention that the brackets on the barn were installed in 1998.
Although the brackets are not historic or original, staff believes that they are compatible with the
barn and its simple Vernacular style. A decision to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
demolition of outbuildings on contributing are to be made on a case-by-case basis considering the
condition, integrity and architectural significance of the outbuilding. As presented in the November
7 meeting, the barn was originally built sometime prior to 1920 and has typical features of similar
structures built at the time. The barn is leaning to the north, however staff believes that it is not in a
condition that is beyond repair. The barn can be stabilized by using braces to eliminate the lean. One
of the foundation piers should also be strengthened to ensure stability. The building official concurs
with staff that the bracing would help stabilize the building.
Application for Historic Review
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or proper-
ties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.
icgov. orglH Phandbook.
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month.
During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday.
Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Monday the week prior to
the meeting.
~~t~t~~b~~ted ..N~v.~...~.?;..(?1
o Certificate of No Material Effect
~ C~ificate of Appropriateness
~ Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
CHRl S LJ.+A?M!tN
o Owner .........................................................................................
Phone..~..................ce.....?.I....::...l.9..~...?:............
Address .I.fJ..t..b......€::.. ...~.(l.?!.t./.I:::!..€.TI?!Y... ....
........I..(2...~(J........t:.:..!..:~/..x........!..A...........................
email................................................................................................
o Contractor .............S..!2::.~;.!:~..........................................
Add ress . ......... ..... ....... .... ...... ... ...... ...... ..... ............ .................... ......
Phone ... .... ..... ....... ....... ......... ......... ..... ...... ... .... ... ... ... .......................
email................................................................................................
o Consultant ........::=:=:~::::...................................................
Address ... ..... ... ........... ......... ... ...... .... ....... ... .... ...... ... ...... .... .... ...... ...
Phone... .... ..... ..... ..... ...... ....... .,. ........ ............ .... ...... ... .......... .... .... .....
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
o Site plan
o Floor plans
o Building elevations
~ Photographs
o Product information
o Other ...................................... ........................................
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently de-
scribe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
Address of property ....!!.?.L~......E......':::!!'t.~t!/!'/fT?N
Use of property......I~e:;..~~.!...f?...~..(\!...q~:...................
Date constructed (if known)........~...'!......i.9.f.p....:::...l..f:..
Historic Designation
o This property is a local historic landmark
OR
o This property is located in the:
o Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
o Longfellow Historic District
o Summit Street Historic District
o Woodlawn Historic District
o Clark Street Conservation District
JiI""'College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
o Contributing
o Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Project Type
o Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
Jill' Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not.
change its appearance
o Other ..............................................................................................
Project description
..........................................................................................................................~......................................................................................................................
"6 M 0 L-1f1 ON (0 I;:: r:/ A f2-. f\J
..............f{t)..ZA.....'Ti,:;;:..~b........@J.......i?.~..g.........O..F.........................................................................................................
...................................................~............................................................................................................................................................................................
Lor '2 /i;... LN A'7" (.-1- fA! 6'1'0/\/
......":..... ........................................................................................................ .....".........................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Materials to be used
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Exterior appearance changes
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::5E:.:~::::::::::::2t:::~:Q::y::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
ppdadm/HP HandbooklApp.p65
f YZ' . ':."'-.::;:::. '
~\-'\.. "
>,of I''':
I '"
!'~,I
\'
'\ \
J I
l
"
'- " -..
'...... -.......,.._J
........."" \
~
--
""'..........
I
f
.....
--
-..:..
Staff Report
December 13, 2007
Historic Review for 521 S. Governor Street
District: Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District
Classification: Contributing
The applicants, Grace and Whitey Piro, are requesting approval for a proposed addition project at 521
Governor Street, a non-contributing property the Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District. They are
seeking approval to construct a new one-story addition (approximately 20 feet x 25 feet in footprint) on the
west side of the house.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
5.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Additions
5.1 Expansion of Building Footprint
Staff Comments
The house was originally built in c. 1915 and has been significandy altered at an unknown date. Sanborn maps
(1920, 1926 and 1933) show a simple two-story I-shaped house with what appears to be a three-bay front
fa~ade with slighdy projected central bay. A small one-story addition can be seen at the back of the house. It
appears that the addition was removed and the house was altered sometime in the late 1930s or early 1940s to
its current configuration and roof proftle. The original siding has also been covered with vinyl siding. The
house may have been built with minimal features or the original stylistic features have either been removed
when the alterations were carried out. The mass of the house, the original roofline and window proportions
suggest that the house may have been built with some Early 20th Century Revival or Vernacular influences.
The applicants are now proposing to build a one-story new addition. The addition would be offset from the
south fa~ade by approximately 1 foot. It would be built with a gabled roof (4:12 pitch) asphalt shingles, metal-
clad wood windows, vinyl siding, poured concrete foundation. To enable the addition, they are proposing to
replace one of the original windows on the mid-landing level with a smaller metal-clad wood double hung
window. The applicants are also proposing to replace a kitchen window on the first floor level with a new
metal clad-wood window. Both the windows are on the west fa~ade. They intend to use trim that is similar in
proftle to the existing window trim on the house.
The guidelines recommend using siding on a new addition that is similar in size, shape, texture and material to
the existing siding on the historic building. The guidelines disallow using synthetic siding on an addition
instead of historic siding type or an approved substitute siding material. As mentioned above, currendy the
house is covered with vinyl siding and whether the original siding still exists or the condition of the siding
underneath the vinyl siding is unknown. Most other features of the proposed addition are generally consistent
with the guidelines.
Application for Historic Review
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or proper-
ties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa Oty Historic Preservation
Handbook. which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.
icgov.orgIHPhondbook.
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month.
During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday.
Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Monday the week prior to
the meeting.
~~::~b~:ed ........1.1.:..22.Q.::..Q..1...............
[J Certificate of No Material Effect
liY' Certificate of Appropriateness
[J Major review
[J Intermediate review
[J Minor review
Applicant Information
(Prease check primary contact person)
[J Owner ......c;..c~~.e.......:t..v.:!.hllf.y..........E:'.i.~~.......
Phone...........3..~...:......JL?.!..J.......~.................................
Address ......~.l.L...........:2.!.....&.~.~~f.llQ.r.:..................
email................................................................................................
[J Contractor .....llL:':Q.!?.t1.~.~1::..~........2+..f...l0.d:~:J.~j
Address ....1...I.5:..........~.2'i.~~...2L............................
.......M.d~......ll.b.:f.x.1l....t..~..1.....J:.?::.?! 7
Phone......3!..1.:::.....?e.?:Ld..::.....tJ.L'i..!..............................
email......{)jt:.:d.Q.nQy.lj~...~...:2r:..~~J..b..5.I.9.f~.!..~t
[J Consultant .................................................................................
Address ..........................................................................................
Phone..............................................................................................
.....................-........-................................................-..............................................
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Atta..shed are the following items:
Ill""" Site plan
~Floor plans
~ Building elevations
~ Photographs V; fA e ~ tylc~i I
[J Product information
[J Other ..............................................................................
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing strUcture, please submit a
site plan, f\oor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently de-
scribe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
~ '7 I < {,..c'/HfI1'lT-
Address of property ...........i:................_.I......"....,..............................
~::..~~:~~::::::::::::;:~~~5I~:::::~I~~:::::~::::g:ei:~::::::
Date constructed (if known) ..........l..?.LP.......................................
Historic Designation
[J This property is a local historic landmark
OR
[J This property is located in the:
[J Brown Street Historic District
[J College Green Historic District
[J East College Street Historic District
[J Longfellow Historic District
[J Summit Street Historic District
[J Woodlawn Historic District
[J Clark Street Conservation District
[J College Hill Conservation District
[J Dearborn Street Conservation District
~ Lu~vemor Street Conservation District
,-~
Within the district, this property is classified as:
[J Contributing
~oncontributing
[J Nonhistoric
Project Type
[J Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
~dditiOn to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
[J Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim. baluster or similar)
[J Construction of new building
[J Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not .
change its appearance
[J Other ........_....................................................................................
Project description
......._....................._......_...___..~~~!.~.!'..~!'!..!!_~~u.........._...._................_...................._.....u.....u..._........u._........~~~~.~.~~~~~~_~~":-_......__._..~--:-._~~~.~.~~~~_~,:~.::::_...._~:~~
This is for a 20'x24' addition on the.back (west side) of the house; The. addition will be
for a handicap accessible bedroom an bathroom. The owners are an elderly couple - he
has Alzheimer's disease and she would like to care for him as long as possible. Currently
the only bathroom he can use is upstairs, and the stairs are already too challenging. The
addition will be built over a "conditioned crawl space." We would like to match all
current exterior finishes.
---------:..----...-----...--.--.----.....-..-..........--.........-....----..-....--
.-....---........--.-......----.--........--.--.--.--.---.--.--.--.............--.....................--.--.....................................-.------..---.--....--........--..---.............---....-.--........
.............................................................-........................................................................-....-.-..............-..--....................................
..................................................................-................-...........................~..........................................................................................
......................................................................................................................-............................................-.................-....................
Materials to be used
_..__._.._.,.--......---- ."A .~.-..........__~........._.........._
. Asphalt shingles to match existing
. 4" exposure vinyl siding to match existing
. aluminum soffit and fascia to match existing
. Marvin -Integrity, double hung windows
. Poured concrete foundation
.. ....... ... ... ... .... ... ... ....... ..... ..... ... ... ....... ... ... .... ... ...... ..... ...... ....... ...... ....... ...... .... ......... ....... ... ......... ...................... ... ... ..... ... ...... .......... .... .....
Exterior appearance changes
Again, the addition will be on the back side of the house. Currently the back yard is
completely fenced off from the back alley. From the front, there will be nothing sticking
out beyond the existing sides of the house.
We are aware that the existing finishes are not acceptable with-in the historic guide lines,
but for what it's worth... (oYU/,'/lJ !/,flhcf!,,\
1. This house is non-conforming to the hjsr6ric district
2. The existing exterior finishes are relatively new and have many more years of life
in them. If we match existing, the entire house can be brought up to historic
district standards at that time
3. The homeowners want to do this project even if we need to confonn to historic
district finishes, but if we match existing, it will help them financially.
4. the addition will not be very visible from the street or back alley.
.. .I~
if)
w
'"
::>
f-
o
::>
'"
f-
if)
:I:
C>
::>
o
z
o
Cl
U
::;;
;;:
U-
N
..
~
'"
'"
c:~
'" -
N,
<OW
~5
~it
ffi~
~~
~~
"'6>
~M
133tLLS ClONCJ3A08 H.LnOS
z
Qo
t:~
ON
0<0
<{<{
:;;3:
00
0-,
~~
lliG
cr:~
~O
W-
~~
'Z....
Wcr:O
OWO
Z > N~
wO....
0<9cr:
ffii!'lli
cr:0:;;
OWW
Q;N~
CL",O
.00'09
~-3Nli }j~3dO~d----r------'"
...J
>-
I-
0:::
ill
a..
o
0:::
~,o',oe
9
to
N
"O',e8
(!)w
~cn
I-::l 1;'>
~o ~
~I
.O',g -,{
1--"t',~8
z
o
1;'>1=
~Ci
Cl
<(
.L'm
,~',6-{
b
o
o
L{)
9
o
1;'>
10
....
ill
(!)w Z
~(!) ~
1:;> tn~ >-
i'l ~(3 ~
t .o"g .0',Oe "O',e8 t ~
I 1:;> .0:::
I i'x:> i a..
... - - -, ->L.- - -- - -, - - '- -, - -.- -'...
3NIl A.lCJ3dOCJd
I
h:
o
z
;':;0
<9
0':0
z.
::55'
a.."j'j
~~
00;::0
I
~O-,gc:: !
,f/",g , -.~',6
r-I::~------_=~:l -
m'l f-----------I L....__ 0"', ~
m.p"p~.,"..'.:'h:~._=::::==_=.::~~_.. ' 09m
..:..:.......--'---
i
I
.1
i
,;1
i /i
;1
.~',6
::;:
o
o
~~ @
1I ~
J: W
~
::;:
::;:
o
o
a:
o
::J
::;:
m"=-:::::I':'i<:r:>rj
--. ~,
!r~=~1
fr 1 .
~ i 1 ::;:
::J i I 8
1:5 .1-1 cr
IT2:Z.,:::::. I ~
I I
I ( I . ..l..--------==.J
'.' " - - -- I
L....,--...-....,....--........:.:!..:~~.i ~---fT,______
t
~
""
~
~
~~ 0
~~ ~
I'~
~~
::Ii- W
8~ ~ ~
~~ 0 1x>
~~ ~ ~
~1i ~ J:
~~ t;
9[2 X
0, w
g~
&~
~z
.~,",
.~'-,6
.fo'-,L'-
~C\I
~o
z
0 0
;:: ..,.
0 N
N
0<0
<t:<t:
~ :.3:
00
0 -
N ['5~
..,.
:;: ~()
J,
'" o::~
Ul '"
UJ t'-~ ~O
0:: Me (f)-
:J ~ ~~
t;,...~w
:::J:j:!:;<z ZI'-
~t;j--:~ " w rr:o Z
~ () WO 0
UlWi'=n. z >":
, z ;::
G~ffi~ ~! '0 W 01'- ~
~~ 0 (90::
::>J:~1' oz c "0 iii IW W
O..-...JU") 0" ~ Dc UJ f-lJ) -' 1;>
5~~ffi ~o c, 0:: 0:' W
oC\lo:::o;- ZZ ~~ 0 (/)W f- II
~~~~ ~~ ~ffi () (/)
UW 0:: N W W ~
~~ cO g~ a: 3:
~~ '" 0
~~ ,0 ;>0 !~
~~ ~~~
.~ e~ ~~6 z'
0' Q~ ,,~
00 05~
~~ ",~
"ij) ~g~ ZU~
go ~~ ~~3
Oc ~O ~>w
~' 8:3 ~"~ 8~~
5~ "5 zz
z""
~~ ~~ ::l~~ M~
<M zz~
.v-,6
.fz-.,
--t
----\;-
~
~
!~
S?;
~~
3~
8"
~w
z~
?:~
85
~~
cl~
w'
u~
i~
~
5
~
o
c
"
~
~
~
"-
<;;J
::;
'"
'"
~ ~~
~ ~~
~E~~
~~~~
C>(f)W'Q'
5~~~
5~~~
8~~~
;:Eb;ze
~.
00
~~
~~
~~~
~~@
<ll~~
8~~
~~(I)
zz~
~
~
z
g~
H
,0
~~
CO
~~
~~
~.
.0
8"
~~
~~
~\\ '.
~
m
z
o
F
i5
Q
~(V)
~O
z
Qo
f-....
o~
0'"
<<
::;$:
gQ
~~
~(j
rY~
g!o
(/J-
:Hs
'Z"-
WrYO
owo
z>'"
wo"""-
O(!)rY
cnJ:w
Wf-'"
rYo::;
o(/Jw
Q;;Nfrl
a. ",0
z
o
~
..J
w.
:c5'
~Ji
0:'1:
(/J ~
~
N
..
~
'"
~ ~~
i= ~~
~5~~
t;lli~~
5~ffi~
5~~J;
Zco:r:<D
g~tr~
~~~~
~
.
~~
0I~
ZUg
~~Z
00 '.
8~~
~~~
zz~
~~
z'
.~
~(i~
~~z
",.
~'0
8~'
~~~
ZZ~
~
~~
~~
zin
Q~
C0
~~
"X
~w
O~
.0
~~
~i
z
o
CO
B
~
~
~
~
~
"
<
"
~
~-q-
~O
Z
Qo
f-'<t
~N
ON
0'"
<t:<(
:>$:
00
o~
gj~
~0
o:~
~o
rfJ-
::Ji~
'ZI'-
Wo:O
()WO
Z>~
wOI'-
g(!)o:
rfJ:r:W
Wf-al
0:0:>
O(f.lW
~N~
0..",0
Z
o
F=
~
W
...J
W"
I ~
f-~
0:: JI
0;'-
Z~
Staff Report
December 13, 2007
Historic Review for 430 Oakland Avenue
District: Longfellow Conservation District
Classification: Contributing
The applicant, Carl Hirschman, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 430 Oakland
Avenue, a contributing property the Longfellow Historic District. He is seeking approval to enclose an
existing porch located on the north side of the house.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations
4.8 Porches
Staff Comments
This Dutch Colonial house was built in c. 1925 and has been well maintained with few changes on the
exterior. This is one of the many houses in the vicinity that have been built with Dutch Colonial influence.
The applicant is proposing to enclose an original open porch that is located on the northwest corner, to
construct a laundry area and bathroom. He is proposing to install a salvaged double-hung window on the
west and a new smaller fixed-pane window on the north side of the enclosed room. He intends to use wood
or fiber cement board siding and matching trim that matches the existing siding and trim on the house.
The guidelines disallow enclosing front porches or porches that are highly visible from the street with
permanent windows and walls. The applicant indicates that the only access to the porch is via the entry
vestibule (there is a separate small entry porch at the front door that will not be affected by this application)
and it therefore is not a very function porch. There is also a larger sun porch and a screened porch on the
south side that are more functional given their placement in the floor plan.
Staff has informed the applicant that the project is inconsistent with the guidelines and recommended that
other alternatives should be explored to maximize the use of interior spaces and increase functionality. The
applicant requested to proceed with the application to seek Commission's opinion.
12/03/2007 MON 10:55 FAX 3193634633 Dynamic Broadband Inc.
[2]001/008
Application for Historic Review
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or proper-
ties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.
;cgov.orgIHPhandbook.
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month.
During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday.
Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Monday the week prior to
the meeting.
~~t~t:~b~~ted ...ruf:.:.~....O.3.it.tl.
o Certificate of No Material Effe/t I""
vcr Certificate of Appropriateness
VZf Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
txI Owner ...C.o..r...L......~hs.t;..h.!':I:':-.~'::f.}.................................
Phone.....:S.i..5..::33.L:,:.~U.o..\........ ............. ............ ............ ....
Add ress ..lO.,~~.......E:....::5.~.,:Ht..Cs.Q.o...'~.;t..,....................
.................1~w..~.....c.~:t.O.....:r.A.......~~~5..........
email.....CA\...~....hitt:S.l-...h..~.l..~.J...~l6..ClA..1..~.:t..........
o Contractor .... ............ .................................................. ...... ........
Add ress ............................ ......................... ............. .................. ......
Phone ............................................... ............ ................. ....,... ..........
email................................................................................................
o Consultant .................................................................................
Address .... ...... ............ ..................................... ............. ..................
Phone......................................... .....................................................
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items;
Il:( Site plan
1lI Floor plans
'ltj Building elevations
~ Photographs
~ Product information
o Other ............................ ....... .......................... .................
If the proposed project entails an addition. a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan. floor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a stl'ucture.
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently de.
scribe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
Address of property ..4.W......QGI..~.\LUt;\.d.......Au.f..................
....................................................................................................................
Use of property.. .~.~.~:!~~!k..\J...... ...... ........... ................. ................
Date constructed (if known)...\3.~:l............................."..............
Historic Designation
o This property is a local historic landmark
OR
IBl This property is located in the:
o Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
rzJ Longfellow Historic District
o Summi~ Street Historic District
o WoodlawhHistoric District
o Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
(J Contributing
(J Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Project Type
~ Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
1Il Construction of new building
~ Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not.
change its appearance
o Other .......... ......................... ........ .... ...... ...... ...................................
12/03/2007 MON 10:55 FAX 3193634633 Dynamic Broadband Inc.
~002/008
Project description
....~...Co.l0..s..\J.~,sJ:........~....c.u.f.........c.cJ.l.d5Q.......~:U~f.......w.J.\h.......~........IuJI..Q~~.....~Kp..:Y.:.f..M,U,*...~.b.;:~.\i:;.....i).
......:......................................................................................................................................1'....................................................................................................
.:~~:~~~~~::~~~:~~:::~~~:~~::::~~~:::~:::.~~~~a.~~~~:~::::
.~...~dd........J..\f.(MP.l........}.o........,{e.o.c.....J........~.~~........so......c.J.1J..c.......:)faL~........Lp.n.....'oe........c..oo..v.!u...J:.e.J
.. ........ """ :h.?.. ..... ...N:\.D..~l.02.(.........bd.(Q.Qllf.I...................... ............. .................. ................... ................................................................. ... ............
..................................................................................."....................................04.............................u....,......................................................................................
Project Description, Materials to be used, Exterior appearance changes
. North Porch:'Close in the north porch for use as a laundry room and bathroom.
In order to update the kitchen and make it more usable for modern use, the current
1 st floor Y2 bathroom and laundry room spaces will be added to the kitchen area.
These will be moved to the north porch. There is currently an internal window on
the bathroom that is original. This window will be put on the porch to maintain
historic character. Wood or concrete board siding that matches tbe current house
will be used. Moldings will be used that match the other windows on the house.
This will not change the existing roof-line or house foot print.
...........................................,........................,....................n..........................................................................................................................................................
...........h...............................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Exterior appearance changes
......................................................................................................................................................................................,....................................,..............,.....,....
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................t...................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
ppdadmlHP HandbooklApp.p65
<-\
d
~ ~ ~:J
\) .B
~
,
_1
'1"
d
c..-<
(i'!...J
~.
"
lJJ
\,
"--1 ~
~~. d; ~
:( .....
. ~.'-""'"
<;{''\-''
'lor ~ L+--
i?'~ \rf
-.-f1 i!L..'-~
'" '" a. ______
1 z ~\
/
..
~,----; >- ~
!
I o~ ;
,.,.
U>
~i
III
-:0 I
~
i
']
~
.>
~(
---i
, ~
f I I
I I
!
I : I
\
I
i !
" ! I
I
;
~ I
,
f I
, ! I ,
I
I ~ I
1--. I
r--- I I
r''''
i I
j Lb.,- ~ ).. I
..:. I ! I I
I V I I.
e
, I
I 1 I
/ I
\ I
I
... -.... I ~ I J i
..
"- I I f
I I
(
I ,
I
l
\- i
!
""
t
,
~J
\
_J
I
....,
v> j
if-"'.... .J
~ (y~
.->- '
~ --S 3 ~,!-,
i .>-
o l'
<. i.
'"
.....
;><
w
r
6-<':)
c:. <;:.
, 0-:) J
,- 0 '-
C 'OLi ()
0/. 'C
~ (~~
"J,S 6 C
J ..... -t) ,_
(/) c;
-:: '~,- c
"3 ~ 3-
'~
\:,
...
Q
~
~
c
\~\
.~~
- ,-
<:>I 0
- "
C ?' "-
-r '"
I
i
~J
-
~
II
-:::
~
(
o
'.-1"'\
~
?
($
u:;
;,-
~
)
'.
~
-s
4)
.:.
)
o
..-,-
5>
Il'-'
~
-.-
. (.2
x
Lw
(!)
s
s
Staff Report
December 13, 2007
Historic Review for 2460 S. Gilbert Street
District: N/ A
Classification: Historic Landmark
The applicants, Don and Lori Cochran, are requesting approval for an alteration project carried out at 2460
South Gilbert, which is a local Historic Landmark property. The property is also listed in the National
Register of Historic Places. The applicants requesting approval for alterations to an existing outbuilding-
shed/ greenhouse-located behind the historic McCollister House, that was rebuilt without prior approval or
a building permit.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
5.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for New Construction
5.2 New Outbuildings
Staff Comments
Listed in the National Register, McCollister Farmstead is one of the oldest farmsteads in Johnson County.
Built in 1864 (expanded in c. 1880) the house is a good example of Italianate Style. Several outbuildings were
built on the property over the year, including a large historic barn. The barn was partially demolished due to
significant storm-damage in 2004.
A non-historic concrete block shed/greenhouse was among the other outbuildings on the property. In 2006,
the applicants rebuilt the walls and roof for this dilapidated shed, using log siding, vinyl windows of various
types and sizes (slider and fixed-pane) and two large patio doors. A new full-width porch has been added on
the south side. The lower part of the structure (approximately 2 feet) has been clad with a stone veneer. The
roofline of the structure and the structure, in general, resembles similar farm structures. Staff expressed
concerns about the exterior finish and the resulting 'log-cabin' appearance. The applicant approached the
Commission in April 2006 to seek guidance. After the meeting, the applicants continued the work and
installed board and batten siding on the structure without permit. The applicants are now seeking approval
for the work.
The guidelines allow for the exception to use vinyl or vinyl-clad windows in conservation district on new
outbuildings. Staff recommends that wood or metal-clad wood windows should be used. Staff believes that
the shed-roofed porch is inconsistent in terms of its design and scale with similar farm structures. If the
Commission agrees to approve the project, staff recommends that the porch should be simplified by
removing the decorative treatment.
Application for Historic Review
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or proper-
ties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.
icgov. orglH Phandbook.
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month.
During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday.
Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Monday the week prior to
the meeting.
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
~wner .)).q.h....:...\Q.r..l........C~.~h{g.n,........
Phone.........3.J.1..~..33..0...:....t.~..7.:...4......................
Address .......b.y..........EdJ;~.......C!>.f)'(
email.........
o Contractor ........................A!./tI:.......................................
Address ... ...... ... .....,.... .... ...... ... ......... ... ........ ... .... ..... ......... ......... .....
Phone... .... ..... .......... ............. ........... ....... ..... .... .... ..... .......... .......... ...
email................................................................................................
o Consultant ................m..J:1.7.....$...................t.....................
Address ........... 1.'1.1.7.... .... .$. .:: ...G,. .\.lae.#.::.. ................ .....
..........................~.\..C:...............................................................
Phone..................3..I.q..=..3.~.!...~..:h..Z~.1:..............
.......:.........iI"'ii\........Z....;i;'-ji.J.. "'T....j. .1........J~....I.............f.......
emall........~.I..J.m..~.l...MY....n~ fA ..fryJ.. .G... ...f}.f....... .......
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
~te plan
z( /Ioor plans
tl ~uilding elevations
e{ Photographs
o Product information
o Other ............................................ ..................................
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently de-
scribe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
, ~;t~~b~~d J)U.o.!1 (q,
'I 0 Certificate of No Material Effei'''
v6'. C~ficate of Appropriateness
~ Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Property Information t./W 5. C/!w! Sf
Address of property ...........2:..............................................................
~~~..~;.~;~~~.~~:::::::::::::::i::::;;~l::4..~:~:ki>~7:::::::::::::::::
Date constructed (if known) .......L9...r.??.~......y............................
Historic Designation
.e(lhis property is a local historic landmark
OR
o This property is located in the:
o Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
o Longfellow Historic District
o Summit Street Historic District
o Woodlawn Historic District
o Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
o Contributing
o Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Pr~ect Type
..e:('"" Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not.
change its appearance
o Other ..............................................................................................
Project description
................. ......... ....... ........... ..... .... .................. ...:.......... .............. .... ............... ...........'!;;...... ..... 'T"'," .... ..... ........ ............'{.... ....... ... ... ..... ........... ... .... ...:. .::. ......:.. /
....Th:>...P7fr.?:f.:..J:;i,...flQ.LcMlQb..4:.a;,..0.i.I.?Lh 1-
ml!lfJt24#y!:J..??fd...6Ydd..lR:ll.f.Q(I...ihi5mf2.r.f)J?<!:c.o/:.~I~/;.?.tjdl
...........f~.S...............u..,$...~d...............tJ.c.................6~fP..V.~.:c.............q..I(,J..d..............~qr.........9:.....f?a.....j!l..H.. ~rS/
..:1k..f!.a!j~c..d7::.,:l1d"'du...Pfd.1l:itJ.7..7a.!1{A2..iCt2al:..t.s.i.'0I'.vz
..........4...?..(:i........w.I.~/.I..d~S............IM.{.),u.r;..e.7'.........a;:;......dIe./<i(t.~C(...haJ(.J..........a.Kk..d.........d.f..'5.ff.:~..^
.........-tt2.b:..... .........~.(.!;;../.h..'K:J.J............... .6./::7.:ldC;-/.:!;1,.d,.. ..... .... ........... ... .... .......... ...... ..... .......... ............ ........ .... ....... ... ............. .........
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Materials to be used .
...................................6e.e.....................q./.jg,..?:.kd................d;('dk.k!.r.5r.17.J....~...............................................................................
...........:.:;1...........................;..........7...........................7.........................................../...............7.............../...................J,.........................~.~../
..........//Ie.........;2.f.:l2ie..f:f...........(..!:J.L~.Lfd..ek..5............dl.a./:t1(..(..'R.t.Li.........p:~bJ.................!j(/!.........~~.....rq..f-.
..........b2ti.J.................~.Ri..!I/.~j:.-t!...d................f.tI...kk7............./a$...?.(..!lf..../...............d~.ft;t../.........../k?r?./}....
......V2/..R1.dll..~..J.............~~.h.?!I2................f.'.'.:#l3.~.~J..M..................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Exterior appearance changes
....................)/...............;.....................p...:../..............................................................................[.....................................................................................
t'd;~~~:..E.:Q~mmm'. ;f..c::.7;p1~j....~.."jTmZ.;I.;;.mrm
[; L::;;i:d;..7;:m..lJ.H.lC.n7~;)Ld.}(Jj.hLLm7';;::zh;~f:t:.q~
.....SfI'~J;:f/;.hi:l.e:I...'T....4.I..f.L.ZJ.r!;;;...u......ijp.ki:u.....p?.....u....."'.....u...f:1......~.f4
....~...i:/.Y.ht.s.~.....M.f..:(J1.~......t?:?1...........hti.c.f([.&...lI...........................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
ppdadm/HP HandbooklApp.p65
Project description. 'I ..'
,,' '.' /"~" _..,' . ,.r..,.:< ..! ,/., . ,~",'\"."". ,;"", .'." .........' '.'. ";,,f:', .1
25 I,;; :~,,..( (" J'"j ,', b"",'; (' i ".~ }.r,,,,f' }/".\ ,.') ].,~... ".' ,,..,,
.................... .:;.,...:....F...:............................. ..{.... ...........::...... ...:. ~. .:,...:...'................. ..J,.... .::'; .7::....:... .~:......... ";,':'" .........-l. :.:.~...............................:........... ...Y........
iPt.. ".1 I'/"':l'~ ""f!;~P' t'l. ,f .(,. 1'.' ..." yc' ..;;":f~ ~.i' 'i'~. t,i ~ . '--:-"."1\t' .""",,1.
" -""t ' " ~"'.' ,,",'" 'I ,," .' ,',',< lk'w -0\1" ....+ .' .. fI"Ii' ... fir \", 'l"'""l'~ ' "*,
....................,........................ . ...................~.... ....................... .. ...1...... ro.;.......................Z.. .........~.............:,..,....................... ...........................................} .............
/.,~ . "" (,," ii' ./ ! i . t. i" .;e ...' ';..", .' . 1.:/1. I'
"'.....,...'" \\0<1' f . '" 1/1,'; .. .':,: <t..t '... #., !f^,J. . jO'.
.............l<...................... ,'....................,......................m..........".................",..;.....1.............:......................: i."................ ..W-.I... .......J:.................................
, /' " . r ~
,~,,~ 1 In .( lit; /' i.....J;I.~ j,. '. /.' . '...... .J N.' ~ <:,'. . '^ ~ ," f:;'A- io'J..
"'t V" ' v.... r ' -. I "'" - "" . r,..t:.!.41"'"L
.........t1...................i............................................:...'j'.........................:.......'/.........1.:.....,;,:............................:~........f.............,.. . ..........................(...................~
..iJ iJ) r .... I~) 4.12. . .1"#1;% I,j."lr,''/ .,.,.:~ ? $ ."" 4,,,;/. ,,' <" -#1' it ,r:l.p'p .,.~I
....../ ~ i;;......W1.. ...........).?........;.. } ...t...,.............. .... ...........~. ....l..,.".........:.}.~. ..".....,....;...... ................... .... .....;;;;...f........,:r...... ...... ......w.... .............
...........r:l..(,..................~.......~...~...t.~....................u..~...(,.I...,..;....:........./:'.:Jf..~:.C...!..l.............~.t...I.I.'(.......(:.~.............................~.. .
,r,f> ' .' . .Jt! ' ,,) '. '. .1
., 1/ ''':...' /.., ..".." "",.iJW' i ,:> ."",~.,::, .' ", . .,,'~ ~ .';$1. ..1..' /\. '1> h' .
. ':.". '.IT"- .. ...,. ,"',.. '''11'".. ." .,~ ,~.. ,-;- "'. ;," :c. .. ..' ',11 ~ ""~: .. .,- ,l>. ~. -," \- '," .. ..,
...........~....i2../j. .......1. ..t~.IV..\.......H:.... .... .......... ............. .1\.................... .............. .........J4!.. !tll!... .~t.......~......,..... ..............iIl ..,.. ...1:1t................i.. ...
'l.:; . ../ !
A .IJ 1;', ......p,,,
...,........ /I...l....t. .;.;;,1.~.................. ~~.i..~ffg. ."1'(,;..'tI.~,'i'!!.... .~............ ...................... ..... ......................................... ..... ................ ...............n.... .............................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Materials to be used I
,#'F
,t'..( ~( t "It/#'< ,)r.~ Y' .~, ,,~ ,
::::::::::::::]::k.~::~~:;~;:~:;;:~:i:~~:::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::=::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::
~
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Exterior appearance changes
.......... ...............~..I.....;..:...)..... .................:.....1....:... ..}..... ................................ ..........:::....?'...........)... ........../...f.:::....:...:.;;...........~........ ........................... .....
.4r.... .' ..1/ t,' ;,./) ,It -. ~ ..1" ,,~,/ ...' f;" f!'
....................A....l:.....;,.......................(........~..:..................................................."'...,:~.-(...........,...........'j"'......il.............................,:r.................................
) r' J' if "f.. .~ .'... ,. '5;",: .:Jf' ....H~ ' ;f"
... .... .......... ../tC.if. :..:..~..:.::; .......... ... .......~;.'i..j....;:'.::.........,l:.. t~............... ....;::....... ...............~.......................~..,l..;.,..........:':.::..... .~..:.!...:.....;:..,.... ... .............
............../)..f..~........~!~. .!~: l:t~~.:.::;.'5. .................::'......... ......j;;;:~.'1?.~..i;,./~~.......~:.".r.:~... ...J(~.!J.: .
. .}. .' I ,\ . '.1
~"}' .' . ", h";1". ~ ll,ti>>~ ..1It _ -t!',;)'~F
............. "..'I<.....f..~............ ..;.~.........:..........................................~....r;,...J .........":............................... ... ...:.....,.. ........,,:'...........
A II'" .../)-" 1"1 ,-~:~ f ( 1 './ J. " ....' 'f. "
............ J. :\4.I<...~~~........... "f;r:.~. .~. ..~.....~............................................ :;?....;...... ~........... .7:.:!.. :~.??..:t. :~t. .':~'" t'....... 1':... .~:.............:....
...................................................... ..................................................... .t. !!.~.:? r:............. .~~,:. ...... ..:f: .!t.r;.~ r.. ~ .:.... ..~:~.. ~~~. ~~....
~
............... .."".'\............ ../.........~.......................... .....................................~. :,::.............. ....i........... .................................:.... r.................. . '
L 6< ~; .Ii, 11'1 ,1' -..' .' #j..4. ....i.,:'.~..~ If' .t' lO..i'1 i. .. {
............. rJ:.. -::.. ~~'.";....... .;;........\............................................................. t....~... ~"'... ~.~.. ..",;i'. .:........... ~'~.1........... ~";......~. .:.:.... ....... j;.:...................... ~':'...
......... ................................................................................................ .k:1-;~. .~. .r!............... .2:.. ..<fI.,:J..................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
ppdadmlHP HandbooklApp,p65
----
Staff Report
December 13, 2007
Historic Review for 821 Dearborn Street
District: Dearborn Street Conservation District
Classification: Contributing
The applicant, Ronald Cohen, is requesting approval for a proposed project involving demolition of an
existing outbuilding and construction of a new outbuilding at 821 Dearborn Street. He is seeking approval to
replace the existing one-car garage located on an alley behind the house with a new two-car garage.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
6.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for New Construction
6.2 New Outbuildings
Staff Comments
At your October 11 meeting, the Commission reviewed an application for the demolition of a garage located
at 821 Dearborn Street. The Commission also reviewed and approved the construction of a new two-car
garage. The approved design included installation of five square clear story windows on the north fa<;:ade of
the garage. The applicant is now seeking approval to install 4 larger casement windows (6 feet x 3 feet) instead
of the clear story windows.
Staff believes the proposed change in the window size and style is not consistent with the guidelines. The
guidelines recommend constructing new outbuildings that reflect the style of the primary structures. The
proposed changes in the fenestration would be inconsistent with the house as well other similar outbuildings.
Installing two double-hung windows that are similar in size as the windows on the house would be more
appropriate. Staff has indicated this concern and suggested the alternative to the applicant.
"'~ \..~ i
''l..
"'w..;.;~......",
." ""'1:1!\t
,/ ~'..
,,..--,,,,,,,,,,__,.,,,,,,,,,..,,,___.._""~_'J_.'~"''''''''' "",...~f""~_,,,,".,"i':::""'~'''''tN .;l/'"".."._....,...""",.,~_,.........""'_~~
~....--l~>-i- "~r' n"~1rW~wn'I~r. \(r'lr".'..lll,..,......,.,.'~.".,...,.
~ ._- '1: r- -r .. .. '~l"- I' ,I J-' }~
r ~:- - -.. .. ""...-. -r-- ,. ~"
\ E"~. ..J.., ,I.'.,.. --' I :. :...1.... 1... t~..l.. '-~\l I
1 ,I' . ': )~Jl 1)1 \ ' ..,
I -'.....~..~JJ ~=" .....--:!.l .....,.,.:- .,- Il.
1
f .__._._...._~-,>.,._""'._...".~_..~._...---_.......,,_! . ~_.-
.-4~~t....
f~~;";.~r,
."..j.r """"1!':
4~,J ~~''4.:..
,p.#o' .~
", .......
,)":;.0""" "-,.......
...",,,;..i'" ""~~'-"'"
~~~,.
..........., ~
z7211?~tb?f,\'
'w"..a:,,-,._-..~!
PKD P6b~P ~a
~ ....L;, "'."'_" ~__,'.""""" .,"".~_..,",,~..,;j." "",,-
GUC:J(qUlfi) ^~ Tf:ZNA-1(V~
Application for Historic Review
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or proper-
ties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process. explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at www.
icgov.orgIHPhandbook.
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month.
During the summer months. the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday.
Applications are due in the PCD Office by noon on Monday the week prior to
the meeting.
For Staff Use:
Date submitted .......................................................
CJ Certificate of No Material Effect
CJ Certificate of Appropriateness
CJ Major review
CJ Intermediate review
CJ Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
CJ Owner ....R.o..~).........CQ..h.~..~........................
Phone..........:tI.D........g:.3.Q......l..4.~.I................................
Address ..........8.2.\.................CR.9.r...bo.t....Y.........
.........................................................................................................
email................................................................................................
CJ Contractor ......Au..S..i:i..~.........C~.~.~.r.~.J1
Address ......j.l.7.............e:.C$..9.~.................................
.............r.9....~y..~;.........S..~..~.~....................................
Phone ....... ... >.:.. :r...Cj::..~4?.9.l........ ............ ..... .............. ....
email................................................................................................
CJ Consultant ....B..[~.4~.y........St:k\.f.i:..0."..............
Address ........l.~.P..Q.........f.~.Q...t...l...............Q...............
.........................................................................................................
Phone.........3.J.~..:3q.?:..~..~...........................
.........................................................................................................
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
CJ Site plan
CJ Floor plans
CJ Building elevations
CJ Photographs
CJ Product information f
CJ Other.........ex.~.lC{~,,~hClV......Q.. ........f..c.: VIeW
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure. please submit a
site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently de-
scribe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information D
Address of property .................:?~..L...................e~(.~..~ r 10
....................................................................................................................
Use of property....... ..... ......... ...... ............ .............. ....... ....... ...... .............
Date constructed (if known)...............................................................
Historic Designation
CJ This property is a local historic landmark
OR
CJ This property is located in the:
CJ Brown Street Historic District
CJ College Green Historic District
CJ East College Street Historic District
CJ Longfellow Historic District
CJ Summit Street Historic District
CJ Woodlawn Historic District
CJ Clark Street Conservation District
CJ College Hill Conservation District
. /
,)(..Dearborn Street Conservation District
CJ Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District
Within the district. this property is classified as:
CJ Contributing
CJ Noncontributing
CJ Nonhistoric
Project Type
CJ Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement. skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
CJ Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
CJ Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
....,: Construction of new building
CJ Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not.
change its appearance
CJ Other... ......... ......... ......... ................... ........... ................ ..... .............
o ve'( t
Project description
................................L;;:.;............~......................(Aj;.~.....:..r.......~........{:................{;j.e..r....................70e..::.:::......,........~.T......
...................."...........................:J.0!......,...................................~d.....U.....,.........................................e......,..,......,.............~.~.,a.,....
........,............,.......:J...........................,......,.,................,.....,..............................................,.............,....,..............,................Z.....................'J.........................
.+o....b.t::.fU(Jmj.b.!./I!!(I.6.L~m~4L.
........,...,.,.....,.,.......W........,.......'(;:J.................,............j...../..............................'t.... ,...................,.......~...I.. ................Ts....'....................
"...........,.............,..............<?...~.....~............................Il...r..r.~...................... ......Q.........,......,..~.(" ...c..c;!.,.,...,.........,.........,........,.....
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::w::::r.I::r;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::h::"2?:::;;;;::f..rA::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
r
......................................... ..................................~........ ............ ............................ .......................
Materials to be used
" '\
.~...J........ ....
~l
....... ....... .....
........j....... ....
....
...... ......... ...
-..
...... ......... ....
............................................................................................................. ...... ...... ............ ............. ............ ....... ........ ..........
............................................................................................. ....................... ................... ............. ..................... ...... ..........
............................................................................................. ........................................... ..... ....... .............. ...... .................
.............................................................................................. ................ ........................ ...... ...................... ....... ..... ............
.............................................................................................. ................ .......... ......... ..... ..... ............... ..... ...... ...........
............................................................................................................... ............ .......................... ............. ...... ........ ..........
............................................................................... .............. ........... ......... ..... .. ........... . ................................................
............................................................................... ............................................................................................................................
Exterior appearance changes
................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................
.-----
..................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................................................,.............................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
ppdadm/HP HandbooklApp.p65
1'--_
=
c::>
C-"j
C()
Q-
L1-I
CO
~
.e:
.....
u
~
0..
VJ
....
~
0..
'€
o
~
VJ
ro
~
....
o
......
....
~
~
~
I
E
o
-€
ro
~
Q
-
N
00
'I I") \-J.\^C"
/\_1,-1......... "/ I \,1 \ ' ,
}- in
, .,..........1\.....
., c: .c:
V.J .V
6 I 1JO LQQZ
CJ 3"1 !.:J
r-..
CJ
o
'""
co
CL-
UJ
en
(1)
.~
.....
u
(1)
0-
Vl
~
(1)
~
'€
o
S
Vl
(1)
~
~
o
'C
(1)
~
pJ
I
E
o
12
t';j
(1)
o
-
N
00
2S:6
6 I 1JO LDOZ
CJ
I i I
It.::!
Quote
f1.r Tv'
Style
Vl1lJ iiQtJ
~r
Ion
Back to Quote
hUp ://m2o srv . 099X .lowes. co m/m2o/medi umQuot e.jsp ?proj eet Id=4X...
Project II:
Customer Name:
Customer Phone:
Customer Address:
Line Item
Frame Size
5 'It
--~lTr---
It
1
Fr~tJc.h ~C)..
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.
1116XX
2701 2ND STREET
CORALVILLE,IA 52241
USA
(319) 545-X300
224327673
RONALD COHEN
(410) 377-4545
X2I DEARBORN
STREET
lOW AQ CITY,
IA 52240
USA
Description:
WINDOW/DOORS
Product Code
Description
Unit Price Quantity Total Price
.,
.,
$437.21
4
$1,74X.X4
0002 .l\1atlufact~rel':Pella Windows &PaiioD()()rs
Frame Size = 2' 11" W x 5'Oivision:HMiIlw()rk
.11" H Product: Windows
RO Size = 2' 11 3/4" W x Type: Casements
5' II 3/4" H Manufacturer: Pella Windows & Patio Doors
Product Line: Pella Products
Product Configuration: Single Unit
Exterior Finish: Hassle-Free Aluminum Exterior
Frame Size Width: 2' 11" --,,----.--------.-..-
Frame Size Height: 5' I I"
Rough Opening Width: 2' II 3/4"
Rough Opening Height: 5' II 3/4"
Exterior Color: White
Seacoast Color: No
Interior Finish: Unfinished-ready for site finishing
Hinging Direction: Left:
Glazing: Energy Saving Low E Glass
(Recommended)
Gas Filled: Argan
6~ '\ A Tempered Glass: No.
'X cJ.-. LV i NC1...tJW S Handle Hardware: Standard Champagne
FaldAway Hardware
Grid Type: 3/4" Waad Remavable - Unfinished
Grid Style: Traditianal Pattem
Lite Pattem: 3W6H
Fiberglass Insect Screen: Champagne
Screen Type: Standard
Wall Depth: 4 9/16" Applied
Series / Prafile: Pella 450 Series
Lead Time: 17 Days
Palt Numbers:
PC2WEAS357I L
PC2U3571 MUN (I)
PC23571SCR (I)
Praject Leadtime: 17 Days
12/03/2007 OX:I0 PM
Quote
0001
RO Size = 72" W x 80" H
Handing = 25 - LH
FrelJ~
c*oCJr
2 on
http://m2osrv.0998.1owes .com/m2o/mediumQuot e.j sp ?proj ectId=48...
Manufactlll'er: Rdiabilt by .JELb~WENMillwork
Masters Patio Doors
Divislc>n:Millwork
Product: Doors
Type: Patio
Manufacturer: Reliabilt by JELD- WEN Millwork
Masters Patio Doors
Product Design: French
Configuration: Double
Rough Opening Width: 72"
Rough Opening Height: 80"
Unit Width: 71 1/2"
Unit Height: 79 1/2"
Brickmould Width: 74"
Brickmould Height: 80 3/4"
Frame Size Width: 70 1/8"
Frame Size Height: 77 1/2"
Size Application: Retro
Door Material: Am'aLast Wood
Lite Pattem: 1 Lite -
Glass Option: Low "E" IG Tempered
Swing: Inswing - Viewed ti'om the Exterior
Handing: 25 - LH
Hinges: Light Brass Hinges
Jamb Species: Primed
Jamb Width: 4 9/16"
Exterior Casing: Primed Brickmould
Weatherstrip: Betge''Compression
Sill Style: FixedYinyfiCap Sill
Sill Finish: Alum"inum
Screens: White
Bore: Double
Lead Time: 18 Days
**Screens will be shipped separately. **
**Screen is for In-Swing units only**
**lvl~()Catatl()~\Tel'si()l1: 2.13.0**
Manufacturer: Wayne- Dalton
, '(__._n_____....._____n____n.__________n...._.n
Division: Millwork /
Product: Doors
e: Garage
Man cturer: Wayne-Dalton /,/
Product tegOlY: Residentip.H5oors
Material: St
Model: 970()
Panel Design: Pr I
Door Color: lte
Door Widt. ' 0"
Door He' t: 8' 0"
Wind Option: None
Loc s: Omit Lock
ad Room: 2' 0"
rack Type: 15" Radius Track - TorqueMaste
ide Room: 3 1/2" or Greater
a ner Headroom Allowance: No
Ope r Type Needed for Headroom Allowance:
None
Installation Option: Professional Install
Detail Fee: Yes
Lead Time: 21 Days
.. .. $1,016.00
$1,016.00
***This door comes equipped with a
1,263.56
$1,263.56
12/03!2007 os: 10 PM
_'_.__._..~_w_____~_____
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2007
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL - CITY HALL
Preliminary
MEMBERS PRESENT: Esther Baker, William Downing, Pam Michaud, Jim Ponto, Ginalie
Swaim, Tim Toomey, Alicia Trimble, Tim Weitzel
MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Brennan
STAFF PRESENT: Sunil Terdalkar
OTHERS PRESENT: Mary Bennett, Jackie Blank, Carl Klaus, Mike Haverkamp, Ken
Slonneger, Marybeth Slonneger
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Weitzel called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
ITEMS OF CONSIDERATION:
Settino a Public Hearino to Desionate 935 E. Market Street as a Historic Landmark. Terdalkar
said that tonight's special meeting is intended to evaluate preliminary eligibility of the house at
935 E. Market Street and to consider setting a public hearing to designate the property as a local
historic landmark. He said at least seven days notice is required prior to a public hearing for
considering landmark designations. Terdalkar said November 1st is the earliest day the
Commission could hold a public meeting on the issue. He said that depending on the discussion
and public input during the public hearing, the Commission could request the City Council to set a
public hearing on November 5.
Weitzel said the Commission has the letter that was sent to City Council and photos that
accompany it. He said 935 E. Market Street is the Isaac Wetherby House and a demolition permit
was taken out by the land owner. He said the land owner does not plan on saving the building,
but is negotiating with Friends of Historic Preservation. Weitzel added that the waiting period for
demolition has expired. Weitzel said the Commission hearing is necessary to for the application
for a Historic Landmark to be considered by the Council. He said nothing can be done about
staying the demolition until the item reaches City Council. Weitzel said that the Commission is
determining tonight whether or not the Wetherby House should be granted a public hearing to be
considered a registered historic landmark.
Marybeth Slonneger, the applicant, said that she was accompanied by Carl Klaus, a retired
professor and a co-representative in the Goosetown Neighborhood, Jackie Blank, Ken Slonneger,
and Mike Haverkamp, President of Friends of Historic Preservation. She added that Mary Bennett
from the State Historical Society of Iowa might be joining the meeting later.
Marybeth Slonneger said the Wetherby House was sold on October 18, 1858 by Patrick Doyle
and his wife Ann. She said Wetherby painted about 1,000 oil paintings and his works are
displayed in museums in Boston, Des Moines, Davenport, and Iowa City. She said Wetherby was
also a photographer and purchased a camera within two years of the camera becoming available.
She said the State Historical Society has 1,450 glass plate negatives of his work. Slonneger said
he took the first pictures of the Old Capitol dating back to 1854 when it was still the state capitol.
She said the 935 E. Market Street house is the only house left in the United States with a direct
connection to Wetherby. She said he lived there from the 1860 to around the 1900s.
Historic Preservation Commission
October 24, 2007
Page 2
Weitzel said tonight the Commission is only establishing merit to hear the significance of the
property at a public hearing.
Bennett said the Wetherby house qualifies for National Register status. She added that the
property would continue to be eligible even if it is moved. Weitzel asked if it based on criterion B,
significant persons. Bennett said it does meet criterion B because it is the only property left that is
associated with Wetherby. Weitzel said that criterion B allows a property to become a landmark
based on the person that lived there, not the historical architecture.
Bennett reiterated the State Historical Society has found that the house qualifies on a preliminary
basis. Weitzel said there has been no formal survey done on this house.
Downing asked how long it has been known that 935 E. Market Street was Wetherby's property.
Bennett said the State Historical Society has had records since the 1970s. Downing asked if the
owner of the house has ever been approached about preservation or registry status. Slonneger
said she approached the former owner of the house and didn't feel that she wanted to sell the
house at the point. She said that she missed her chance to purchase it. Slonneger said the
current owner bought the property on October 4th, 2007. Downing asked what the current owner
intends to do with the property at 935 E. Market. Slonneger said the property will be a four unit
duplex as a rental property. Downing said it is zoned for single family in an RNS-12 zone.
Michaud asked if it was currently a duplex. Weitzel said it is not a duplex. Terdalkar said duplex
structures are allowed in RNS-12 zones.
Michaud asked if the Commission should talk about what has been changed on the house.
Weitzel said the Commission should determine if a property deserves a public hearing. Michaud
asked if the front door has been relocated. Slonneger said pictures suggest that the entry was
moved to the side of the house.
Weitzel said there has been a lot of community support for moving the house. He said date needs
to be determined when to move it.
MOTION: Swaim moved to set a public hearing to establish 935 E. Market as a local
landmark. Downing seconded the motion.
Ponto said he thinks the house is potentially eligible and would like to have a public hearing.
Baker said there is no reason not to have a hearing.
Motion carried on a vote of 7-0.
Terdalkar suggested that the date for the public hearing should be part of the motion.
MOTION: Swaim moved to amend the motion to have the hearing on November 1st at 6:00
p.m. Downing seconded the motion.
Motion carried on a vote of 7-0.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:23 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Doug Ongie
s/pcd/mins/hpcl2007/1 0-24-07 .doc
c
o
tn
.!!!
E'O
E ...
o 0
oCJ
(I)
Co:::
o .....
.- (I) 0
",(,)0
~;N
(1)'0
tn C
~~
D..<t
CJ
'i:
o
...
.!!!
J:
v W I I I
~ >< (5 I >< I >< >< >< >< >< ><
0 I I I
... I I I
... I I I W
... >< >< I >< I I >< >< >< >< ><
- I I (5
0 I
... I I
,.. I I I I W
... >< >< I I I I >< >< >< (5 >< ><
- I I I I
(7) I I I I
(7) I I I W W
>< >< I I I >< >< >< >< ><
iiO I I I (5 (5
I I I
N I I I W W
... >< >< I I I (5 >< >< >< >< - ><
- I I I 0
,.. I I I
co I I I W
N >< 0 I I I (5 >< >< >< >< >< ><
- I I I
to I I I
N W I I I W W
... >< (5 I I I - - >< >< >< >< ><
- I I I 0 0
to I I I
... I I I W W
C'? >< >< I I I (5 >< (5 >< >< >< ><
- I I I
II) I I I
,.. W I I I W W
... >< - I I I - >< >< (5 >< >< ><
it; 0 I I I 0
I I I
N I I I W
... >< >< I I I >< (5 >< >< >< >< ><
~ I I I
I I I
co W I W W I W
0 (5 >< >< I (5 (5 >< >< >< I >< (5
- I I
C'? I I
CO I W I
0 >< >< >< I >< (5 >< >< >< I >< ><
- I I
N I I
IJ) 0> 00 ,.. 0 ,.. 00 0> ,.. 0> 0 0> 00
E.~ e 0 e ... e e e e e ...... e e
- - -
ala. 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0>
I-X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f) ('f)
~
Cl iV
c c E '0 >-
I'G C ::s CI) CI) Q)
Q) ... c 0 '2 I'G .s E :c
III c 0 E ~
E CI) c ~ (.J .c 'j; E
.II: l!! i: C U C 0 ~
co I'G I'G 0 ::s u :Ii 0 ~ 'I: 0
Z In In (.J C C) :E Q. en l- I-
"t:l
Q) ....
~ Q)
u C)..c
x c: E
W:oJQ)
:g:B~
ccQ)~co
Q) l/l ......
l/l~..c<(oo
~..c zz
0..<(111111
~II II b!:!~
:::S:::><OOz
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2007
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL - CITY HALL
Preliminary
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Brennan, William Downing, Pam Michaud, Jim Ponto, Ginalie
Swaim, Tim Toomey, Alicia Trimble, Tim Weitzel
MEMBERS ABSENT: Esther Baker
STAFF PRESENT: Karen Howard, Sunil Terdalkar
OTHERS PRESENT: Roger Anderson, Mary Bennett, Mike Haverkamp, Mike McLaughlin,
Marybeth Slonneger
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Weitzel called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
ITEMS OF CONSIDERATION:
Recommend Approval of 935 E. Market Street as a Historic Landmark. Terdalkar said a landmark
designation can be based on any historical, architectural or archeological significance. He said
the Commission can also consider significant historical events or personalities related to the
property.
Terdalkar said there have been some developments since the previous meeting on October 24th.
He said the applicant and Friends of Historic Preservation have been working with the property
owner to find a solution. Terdalkar said the goal of the landmark designation is to secure the
property so that the house can be moved to a location where it can be restored. He said the State
Historical Society has been approached regarding the eligibility of the Wetherby House. He said
in their preliminary review they have determined that the property is eligible based on the fact that
it is associated with Isaac Wetherby and it is the only known extant building with a connection to
Wetherby. Terdalkar said the State Historical Society also believes that the house may still retain
its eligibility after it is moved to an appropriate location. He said the applicant and owner are
suggesting that the application be deferred. He said there has been a private agreement between
Friends of Historic Preservation and the owner to delay the demolition.
Weitzel asked what the private agreement is. Terdalkar said the agreement is to wait until
November 15th to allow a decision regarding the move, if the application for landmark designation
is deferred. He said the owner is willing to work with Friends of Historic Preservation.
Weitzel asked if the agreement is conditional based on the Commission's deferral tonight.
Terdalkar said that is how the owner of the property has approached staff.
Weitzel asked if after the Commission voted on the issue Planning and Zoning would have one or
two public hearings. Terdalkar said one hearing at the Planning and Zoning Commission. Weitzel
asked if there would be two or three hearings at City Council. Howard said City Council could
hold one meeting, but would have to vote on the application three times. Weitzel asked if there
was any legal way to fast track the application. Terdalkar said there would be some flexibility in
arranging the public meetings and there could be some expedited action. Howard said that
because the property can be designated a landmark after it is moved, the long process could take
place after it is moved.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 1, 2007
Page 2
Weitzel asked if the Commission would have to open the public hearing if they decided not to
defer at this point. Terdalkar said the Commission could get some input from the applicant and
the owner, and then proceed with further discussion. Weitzel said it would be helpful for the
owner and applicant to restate their agreement for the record.
Weitzel said he would like to read the guidelines for landmark status. He said historic landmarks
are buildings that are individually significant for their architectural and/or cultural merits. Like
historic districts, theses properties are typically listed on the National Register of Historic Places,
or are eligible for listing on the National Register. He added that the State Historical Society and
architectural historians that the Wetherby House is eligible. Weitzel said landmarks are properties
that are individually significant because of their architectural quality, integrity and historical or
cultural significance. Weitzel said the Commission isn't here for debate, but instead for fact
finding.
Swaim asked how deferring the application works on behalf of the owner and applicant. Terdalkar
said the owner is willing to work with the applicant and Friends of Historic Preservation on moving
the property. He said there is a 50-day moratorium period if a public hearing is set by the City
Council and the owner would like the City to not set a public hearing. Swaim asked if nothing
could be done to the house during the 50-day moratorium period, including moving it. Terdalkar
said nothing could be done during that 50-day period unless an official action after a public
hearing has taken place.
Weitzel opened the public hearing.
Mike Haverkamp introduced himself as the President of Friends for Historic Preservation. He said
Friends has been talking to Mike McLaughlin, the owner of 935 E. Market Street, about the
possibility of moving the Wetherby House. Haverkamp said there is a possibility of moving the
house to Reno Street Park. He said that the Parks and Recreation Department and City Council
said there need to be support from the Goosetown Neighborhood. He added that a long term plan
needs to be developed for the maintenance of the property. Haverkamp said Friends has been
looking at the possibility of getting HRDP grants and local donations to move the house. He said
Friends came to an agreement with McLaughlin to hold off on the demolition until November 15th
to give Friends enough time to have a rational idea on what it would take the save the house.
Haverkamp said he thinks Friends and the owner have come to a voluntary agreement and
recommends deferral of the application.
McLaughlin said he is the owner of 935 E. Market Street. He said he has been approached by
Marybeth Slonneger and Haverkamp regarding the preservation of the Wetherby House. He said
hat he must demolish or remove the two structures on the property before obtaining a plat survey
to split the existing lot down the middle. He said his plan is to construct two separate structures
on each of the two lots. McLaughlin said there is a garage on the property, but there has only
been interest in the preserving the house. He said it has been worked out over the phone that he
would give the house to Friends of Historic Preservation and they would be responsibly for the
structure. He added that the where the property could be moved still needs to be ironed out.
McLaughlin said he has talked to the City Attorney's about what will happen to his demolition
permit with all of the various scenarios. He said if there would be a recommendation from this
commission or the public to the City Council for a public hearing, then the demolition permit would
be stayed. McLaughlin said he draws the line at the point of a public hearing and does not want to
lose his demolition permit. He said he is willing to deal with this issue privately with Friends of
Historic Preservation. He added that his contractor has no problem waiting until November 15th
for a decision, and might be flexible beyond that. McLaughlin said that losing his demolition
permit would cause a considerable financial burden.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 1, 2007
Page 3
McLaughlin said the request for deferral is preferred because it will allow for a deal to work out
privately and avoid time constraints. Weitzel said the Commission's intent is never to cause
unnecessary delays or expense to a property owner.
Marybeth Slonneger, the applicant, said Carl Klaus and herself are the co-representatives of the
Goosetown Neighborhood Association. She said Klaus cannot attend the meeting tonight, but
strongly recommends the Reno Street Park as a location for the Wetherby House. Slonneger said
a vacant lot left by a demolished house was given to the Reno Street Park by the City and still
has water and gas lines. She added that those water and gas lines could be used to hook up to
the house. Slonneger said Heritage Trees and other local organizations have shown interest in
donating money to restore the house.
Slonneger said a lot available on Prairie du Chien Road and Hickory Hill Park are other options
for the location of the Wetherby House. She said Hickory Hill Park would provide less protection
to the house than Reno Street Park.
Weitzel asked if a vote has been made by the Goosetown Neighborhood Association. Slonneger
said she was supposed to receive e-mails from the other representatives. Weitzel said that it
sounds like there needs to be more time for the association to make a decision. Slonneger said
she sent out the notices about moving the house to Reno Street Park the previous night, so no
one was prepared.
Roger Anderson said that his property is adjacent to the Reno Street Park and does not support
moving the Wetherby House to the park. He said the property should be left where it is. He added
that he objects to losing the park. Anderson said the homes on the south side of the park are
setback quite a distance from other homes in the city, so the further the house is set back, the
less park space there will be left available.
Mary Bennett, an employee of the State Historical Society, said she would like to see the
discussion on the Wetherby House done a public manner. She said that two weeks isn't enough
time to make sure the evaluations are done properly. She added that if private discussions
continue, the threat of a demolition is held over our heads of those trying to save the property.
Bennett said the economic pressures and the private negotiations have not exposed all of the
angles that can be taken. Bennett said she would like to see the property preserved at the current
location.
Weitzel closed the public hearing.
Weitzel said the Commission can now discuss and entertain motions. He added the main concern
is to determine if the Wetherby House is eligible for landmark designation.
Ponto said this is a bad situation because ideally the whole process for designating a landmark
should have started a long time ago. He said the cost of moving it may meet or exceed the
amount the property could be sold at. He added that at this point, private discussions would be in
the best interest of the public. Ponto said he would support deferral of the application.
Michaud asked if a representative from Parks and Recreation would be there during private
discussions. Haverkamp said Friends has talked to Parks and Recreation and will be giving a
presentation to them at their next meeting on November 15th. He added that Parks and
Recreation would be willing to schedule an earlier meeting, if needed.
Swaim said it sounds like if something is going to be worked out, it is going to happen in the next
two weeks.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 1, 2007
Page 4
Toomey asked if approval by Parks and Recreation and the house needs to be moved in two
weeks. McLaughlin said he would be willing to give Friends until 6 p.m. on the 15th of November
to have the structure moved. He added that there may be some flexibility beyond that.
McLaughlin said his contractor that will head up the demolition is willing to be flexible about the
date.
Toomey said that if the house is moved to a city-owned park, it becomes city property. Weitzel
said it depends on what kind of agreements are made.
Weitzel asked what an adequate time frame would be to receive grants for the property. Bennett
said 30 days.
Michaud asked what the time frame is on the demolition permit. McLaughlin said 60 days. He
added that he is trying to complete his project in July 2008 and cannot wait a few months to start
the project. He said he does not want to continue to monitor a request for a public hearing with
the City Council. McLaughlin said a public hearing would be giving up too much of control of the
project.
Michaud asked Slonneger if Plum Grove was an option. Slonneger said Plum Grove is not an
option. She said the Butler property and Wetherby Park are other options. She added that Parks
and Recreation did not recommend Wetherby Park due to the high rate of vandalism. Michaud
asked if Slonneger is looking at creating a trust fund for the house. Slonneger said that is the
goal, but will not set that up personally. She said an endowment fund would likely be set up by
Friends. Slonneger said Friends has also considered having a live-in caretaker.
Michaud asked if the Wetherby House could be moved to a different location on the lot while the
foundation is being built for the duplexes. Terdalkar said that may not be allowed because a lot
must be clear to have it split and to get a building permit for future buildings as the owner is
proposing. Weitzel asked how long those processes typically take. Terdalkar said staff has not
received any plans and cannot give a definite time frame. He added that Housing & Inspection
Services might have more information. Howard said the design review process generally takes
longer than a week, and depending on complexity of the project it may take longer. Weitzel said
he asked about the building permit and design review process to find out if there are other time
restrictions outside of landmark designation.
Weitzel asked McLaughlin how long it would take to demolish the building. McLaughlin said it
would take less than a day.
Howard said Council needs 24 hours notice before setting a public hearing. She recommended
that the applicant and the owner talk to the Council and let them know that a private agreement is
going forward. McLaughlin said regardless of what they would say to Council, they could decide
otherwise and set the public hearing. Howard said the Council has to motion to set a public
hearing, so it is up to the discretion of the City Council to set a public hearing. Weitzel said a
request for a public hearing doesn't necessarily mean the demolition permit will be lost.
McLaughlin said there is always a chance that they could vote in the affirmative and that would
jeopardize the permit.
Toomey asked what effect the Commission would have from voting tonight. He also asked if
voting to designate the Wetherby House as a historic landmark would preveht the demolition from
happening in two weeks. McLaughlin said that recommendation to the City Council would then
have to vote on setting a public hearing. Howard said what the Commission has in front of them is
a request from the applicant to defer to allow private negotiations to continue.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 1, 2007
Page 5
Slonneger asked if the Wetherby House could be moved to some location as a holding place.
Weitzel said since the Historical Society of Iowa said that its eligibility does not suffer from the
location of the building, so a deferral is in order.
MOTION: Ponto made a motion to defer the application. Michaud seconded the motion.
Brennan said he will be voting to defer. He said the current plan is to demolish the structure. He
said deferring the application will allow time to move the building. Brennan said a vote tonight
would put more pressure on McLaughlin to exercise his right of demolition or risk losing his
permit. He said the better decision is to defer.
Swaim said she will be voting to defer. She hopes that the extra time will give the applicant more
time to work on moving the building. She said that she hopes the owner will be flexible about the
moving date.
Weitzel said the applicant should make all due haste to move the building and worry about the
rest later.
Motion carried on a vote of 8-0.
Meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Doug Ongie.
s/pcd/mins/hpcl2007/11-01-07,doc
E:
o
tn
.~
E~
E ...
o 0
()(.)
CI)
E:D::
.2 CI) .....
+'(.)0
nsE:o
~nsN
(1)~
tn E:
~~
0..<(
(.)
.t:
o
+'
.~
:J:
.... W 0 I I
!2 0 >< 0 >< I I >< >< >< >< >< ><
.... I I 0
.... I I 0
"It W 0 I 0
N >< 0 >< I 0 >< >< >< >< >< ><
- 0
0 0 I 0
.... 0 I 0
.... 0 I 0 W
.... >< >< 0 >< I 0 >< >< >< >< ><
- 0
0 0 I 0
.... 0 I I
t- o I I 0 W
.... >< >< 0 I I 0 >< >< >< 0 >< ><
c;; 0 0 I I
I 0 I 0
en I I I W W
- >< >< I I I 0 >< >< 0 >< >< ><
co I 0 I
I 0 I
N I 0 I W W
.... >< >< I 0 I 0 >< >< >< >< 0 ><
- I 0 I
t- o 0 I
co 0 0 I W
N >< 0 0 0 I 0 >< >< >< >< >< ><
- I 0 I
CD I 0 0
N W I 0 0 W W
.... >< 0 I 0 0 0 0 >< >< >< >< ><
- I 0 0
CD 0 0 0
.... I 0 0 W W
M >< >< I 0 0 0 >< -. >< >< >< ><
- I 0 0 0
It) I 0 I
t- W 0 0 I W W
.... >< 0 0 0 I 0 >< >< 0 >< >< ><
- I 0 I
It) I 0 I
N 0 0 0 W
.... >< >< 0 0 0 >< 0 >< >< >< >< ><
- 0 0 0
"It 0 0 0
co W 0 W W 0 W
0 0 >< >< 0 0 0 >< >< >< 0 >< 0
- 0 0
M 0 0
co 0 W 0
0 >< >< >< 0 >< 0 >< >< >< I >< ><
- 0 0
N 0 I
fIl 0) eo t- o t- eo 0) t- O) 0 0) eo
E.~ Q Q ~ .... Q ~ Q Q 0 .... Q Q
-- -- --
GlQ. 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
I-X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w ("I) ("I) ("I) ("I) ("I) ("I) ("I) ("I) ("I) ("I)
~
C) ii
l: l: E 't:l >0-
ns l: :;, G) G) Qj
Q) ... l: 0 '2 l: 0 ns 0 E :c E J::I
E ~ l: I/) ~ (J J: .. 'cv E
e "i: l: .~ l: 0 ~
ro ns ns 0 :;, to) 0 ~ ';:: 0
z m m (J c C) :E :E 0- UJ l- I-
"0
Q) ....
~ Q)
o 0).0
X c: E
W:o::;Q)
:g~~
"E"EQ)~ro
Q) l/l _
l/l~:9oo
~.o"""'zz
ll.. <{ II II II
~II II ~~
~><OOz
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2007
SENIOR CENTER, ROOM 202
PRELIMINARY
MEMBERS PRESENT: Esther Baker, Michael Brennan, William Downing, Pam Michaud, Jim Ponto,
Ginalie Swaim, Tim Toomey, Tim Weitzel
MEMBERS ABSENT: Alicia Trimble
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Miklo, Sunil Terdalkar
OTHERS PRESENT: Hottie Allen, Helen Burford, Mary Bennett, Jeremy Patterson, Marybeth
Slonneger, William Wang
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Weitzel called the meeting to order at 6: 12 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
Terdalkar said that the Parks and Recreation Commission held a meeting at 5:00 to discuss a potential
location for the Wetherby House to be moved to. He said that Mary Bennett gave a presentation to City
Council at which the City Council directed the petitioner to provide additional information about the
project: what steps are necessary to move the house, the restoration work needed, and what the City
would be expected to contribute.
Terdalkar said that a proposal will be submitted to the City Manager, who will eventually contact the City
Council. He said that Friends of Historic Preservation is also working to come with the costs of moving the
house and the future restoration. Terdalkar said that within a couple of days more should be known about
the kinds of financial resources available and the actual costs.
Weitzel said that apparently some of the Commission members have toured the house and found very
little left intact of the original structure. Terdalkar said he was told that there is still some original fabric left
of the building. He said that the original clapboard is still there.
ITEMS OF CONSIDERATION:
Certificate of Appropriateness.
829 Kirkwood Avenue. Terdalkar said that this is a local landmark property that was built in 1874. He said
that the applicant requests replacement of the existing limestone foundation with a new concrete
foundation and would also use limestone veneer outside by saving the existing stone.
Terdalkar said the applicant would also like to replace most of the basement windows and install at least
one egress window; depending on the layout of the basement, the applicant may need more than one
egress window. Terdalkar said the applicant also proposes to repair the existing exterior brick walls. He
said there is quite a bit of damage to be seen, especially the pointing where the mortar is loose. Terdalkar
said it is more evident in the places where additions were put on the building.
Terdalkar showed photographs of where there are joinery problems where additions were put on. He said
there is also uneven settling of the different structures that has caused some damage. Terdalkar said that
the effect of water has also caused problems.
Terdalkar stated that staff is not comfortable at this point approving the replacement, as staff has not
seen any report or structural review of the basement. He said that given the magnitude and significance
of the structure, the Commission should have a preservation architect or engineer with experience in the
preservation of brick buildings and masonry ~lrudules give all opirdoll. Terdalkar said that if there is
enough evidence to support the application, the guidelines recommend that the appearance of the
foundation as existing be matched with regard to material, size, color, composition, and joint profile.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 2
Regarding window replacement, Terdalkar said that he has not seen any information regarding materials
or sizes. He said the applicant did identify the locations of the windows and openings that need to be
replaced. Terdalkar said that where an egress window is installed, construction of the window well should
be matched to the existing foundation, which is the historic foundation, not the one that is being replaced.
He said staff recommends deferral of the application until receiving additional information about the
foundation as well as a structural report.
Patterson said he is a structural mover and would be doing the work on this project. He said that he has
spent two years in New Orleans to move and save historical structures. Patterson said that Eric
_from Shive-Hattery visited the property and said that this needs to be done. Patterson said that Eric
_recommends new concrete footings and a reinforced foundation under the house to save the
structure. Patterson presented a letter from to the Commission.
Patterson said that he is not an engineer, but the engineer who looked at this recommends replacing the
whole basement. Patterson said that radon is another issue for the owner, because this house has open,
dirt floors.
Patterson said he plans to bore cut every hole to save all of the bricks that can be saved, and beam it,
and take pressure. He said that he will dig up the limestone foundation, core bore cut it, and then save it
so it can be reused. Patterson said that he is required to pour two-foot footing for stability. He said that he
will pour all clean rock underneath this and will have to lay a twelve-inch wall to hold the weight of the
building. Patterson said that this structure probably weighs around 850 tons.
Patterson said the problem is that this is an old foundation, although it was state of the art when it was
built in the 1870s. He said there is no footing underneath the building, and there is a huge amount of
moisture underneath the building.
Patterson said that he specializes in historic structures. He said his company owns the second biggest
unified jack machine in the world. Patterson said that it is pressure pointed so that one can control every
tweak at every point. He said that he can fine tune everything. Patterson said that with this technology, he
can pressure one corner that may only weigh five tons, while the next corner may weigh 40 tons. He said
that after locking these pressures off and hitting a valve, they all go up at the same time.
Downing asked if a radon test had ever been done in the house. Patterson said that he never did one, but
he would be concerned about radon if he lived in this house.
Brennan said the application mentions lowering the floor and asked if that is feasible. Patterson said that
he does not have a choice but to lower the floor, because he can't get underneath and excavate without
making it at least 8 % to nine feet. He said that without doing this, one can't make it livable. Patterson said
that there is no mortar left on the foundation; it has all deteriorated. He said there is no strength to it; it is
dilapidated and gone.
Patterson said that a basic wood frame house would settle with no problems. He said that with brick, any
movement in stone or masonry structures is a terrible thing. Patterson said there is not forgiveness with
brick, concrete and stone; they can't bow and deflect.
Patterson said that Mr. Allen is his masonry contractor and has been in the masonry business for 40
years. He said that Allen will go in and relay and re-tuckpoint any bricks that have fallen out.
Weitzel said that the letter from the Shive-Hattery consultant recommends that a footing be installed to
stop the differential settling but makes no comment about the likelihood of collapse. Patterson said that
he cannot predict when the building will collapse but said that he has never had a house collapse when
he has moved it. He said he has already moved 247? houses this year.
Weitzel asked Patterson what would happen with the chimney after the move. Patterson responded that
he uses a banding system to clamp the chimney and is able to save 99% of the chimneys that are there.
He said the same functionality will be there after the move.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 3
Miklo said that staff had asked for some information about the structural stability of the building and had
not received it before tonight's meeting. He suggested that if the Commission was inclined to approve
this, it could be subject to evaluations and conversations with the engineer, given that the engineer's
report was just received.
Weitzel said that the Commission looks at this from both sides. He added that the Secretary of the Interior
Standards say to do the least amount possible to get the building to be preserved.
Miklo said that this sounds like a laudable project. He said there has been some neglect to the building in
the past, and the present owner wants to invest in the building and stabilize and improve it. Miklo said
staff does not necessarily object to the project but needs more information to form a recommendation.
Brennan said that replacing the foundation is not prohibited or disallowed under the guidelines. He said
that the exterior appearance can be restored more or less to what it is now or perhaps what it was when it
was built, and that is the purview of the Commission - the exterior appearance, not whether the
absolutely original foundation stays in place or not. Brennan said the main question is can this be done
while preserving the exterior appearance, and it sounds like it can be. He said that what condition the
foundation is in does not necessarily bear on whether the Commission should approve this or not.
Miklo said he agreed that the real concern is that something be done that does not cause further
structural problems. He said whether the basement is converted to livable space or not is not a major
concern.
Miklo said that the other issue concerns the window replacement, as the owner has still not submitted a
brand name or materials. He said the Commission may want to defer that aspect until the information is
available or until the applicant, chair and staff agree on a window that meets the guidelines.
Patterson said that the foundation reconstruction process will take about 2 'V2 months. He said that a snow
load causes more of a problem. Patterson emphasized that Wang, the owner, wants to do what is right for
this structure, but this is a long process. He said that there is a lot of time to discuss the window plans.
Downing asked who would design the foundation wall. Patterson said that Eric _ of Shive-Hattery
and Allen would be working on the foundation wall. Downing asked how the reclaimed stone would be
supported. Allen said that he'll come up with a twelve-inch block and catch the inside with an eight-inch
block with a four-inch ledge to carry the stone. He said that where the stucco is, there should be enough
stone to carry around, if the owner approves, to blend it in all around.
Allen said he agrees with Patterson. He said the brick is cracking and moving, and the stairway is
impassable. Allen said the house may last 20 years, but it is gradually setting. He said that it can be
temporarily patched up, but that is not going to help it.
Wang, the owner of the house, said he moved into the house six years ago. He said that the first thing he
did was fix the roof. Regarding the basement, Wang said that there is one big area of the room that is wet
every week. He said that it will be a major problem in another five to ten years, so he needs to do
something now. Wang said that the best technology allows him to do this in one shot, with everything
raised up and with everything joined tightly.
Weitzel asked if the drainage will be taken care of at the same time the foundation is poured. Wang
confirmed this.
Weitzel said that he has read about this, and the segmental process has the problem of differential
settlement as the load is put on the different sections. He said that in general, if the whole thing is lifted up
at once, it's a better way to go.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 4
Patterson said that he has that house insured for $600,000. He said that he is not a gambler, and he
never does something that he thinks is not going to be the right thing. Patterson said this technology is
the best way to move this house.
Regarding the windows, Wang said that he intends to use the same size, style, and color as that shown
on the first floor, the double hung egress window. Weitzel said the Commission likes to see the window,
at least the visible part of the window well portion, lined with the same material as the foundation, so in
this case, either limestone or brick for the first 18 to 24 inches. Wang agreed and said he told the
contractor this same thing.
Allen said that wherever the windows would be longer than they are now, he would bring the rock up to
match the rock that goes around. Allen asked what the Commission recommends for window wells.
Weitzel replied that usually the Commission recommends poured concrete with lining of brick or stone,
where it's adhered to the actual poured well.
Allen said that he has used Anamosa stone, but it would look different than the other block. He said he
could bring cement block up and then the last couple of feet put rock on it. Weitzel said that one could
use the regular concrete and just face it with a veneer. He said then there is a superior structure for soil
movement and there is still the look. Allen said he would bring it up to ground level so that there would be
no water. Weitzel agreed it could be brought up the side and then over the top.
Allen asked how much room is needed for access. Weitzel suggested contacting Housing Inspection
Services for this information. Terdalkar replied that the size of the egress window should be 24 inches by
22 inches at least; that's the clear distance. He said that depending on the type of window, one would
need a window well at least three feet wide to give enough room for someone to get out of the opening.
Regarding the plans for the project, Terdalkar said there is a mention of reconfiguring the entryway. He
said that plan also needs to be provided to staff for details. Allen said that Wang would like to have
another entryway out to the south. Wang agreed that he would like to have a door on the back side of the
house.
Terdalkar asked if the plan also includes reconfiguring the existing door on the west side. Wang said
there would be no change to that door. Allen said there would be two access doorways, plus an access
window on the east side.
MOTION: Ponto moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 829 Kirkwood
Avenue for putting in a new foundation to be faced with reclaimed stone to get the current look,
with the windows and the new door to meet the guidelines and be approved by staff and the chair.
Swaim seconded the motion.
Ponto said that a house of this weight not having regular footings is not good for long term stability, and
he is in favor of putting in something solid. Weitzel said that when using the Secretary of the Interiors
Standards, what the Commission looks at is to be as sensitive as possible, especially for landmarks, to
the existing structure and to do the minimal necessary. He said that if this can be done it would be a good
thing. Weitzel said he is not certain that this is absolutely necessary, since he is not an engineer, but at
some point that is the landowner's prerogative to do this. He said the owner has undertaken a lot of roof
work and did use cedar shingles when other types of shingles could have been applied, which is a sign of
authenticity and commitment to this building.
Ponto pointed out that the owner will save the existing stone and cut it to use it as a veneer to put on so it
will look the same. Weitzel said that will save the appearance, but one will lose the historic nature of the
basement, which is not necessarily anything the Commission can control. He said that he would actually
like to have a little discretion for staff to consult with the engineer. Ponto said he could add that to the
motion to give the option for staff to consult.
AMENDMENT TO THE MAIN MOTION: Ponto moved to add to the motion an option for staff
consultation with the project engineer.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 5
Michaud said the Commission has not seen interior photographs to document water damage to the
basement. Miklo said he did not believe that was necessary. He said that staffs concern about this was to
consult with the engineer to make sure there is no further damage to the building.
Patterson pointed out that the time frame for this project is limited. Miklo said staff could have a decision
next week. Wang said that he and his family would be staying at a hotel until the project is completed.
Downing pointed out the importance of keeping the building heated.
Swaim said she appreciated staff's evaluation in not seeing any particular structural faults. She said that,
however, if there is the technology and the kind of foundation that will help this house last another 100
years that will be an investment in the integrity of the building.
Weitzel pointed out that this is limestone, and limestone with a lot of water ends up removing the
limestone, ending up in decay. Swaim said that if the brick problems are related to the foundation, then
that will only get worse if nothing is done.
Wang said that he redid the kitchen two years ago. He said that in that time, the kitchen has already
settled, as evidenced by the ever-increasing gap between the refrigerator and the ceiling.
The motion carried on a vote of 7-1. with Toomev votinQ no.
Wetherby House. Bennett, Slonneger, and Burford discussed the status of the Wetherby House and the
options for saving it. Slonneger said that the Committee to Save Wetherby House (CSWH) has been
formed to save the house, and $7,000 has been donated to that cause. She said that Jean Lloyd-Jones
and Mike Wright are the two co-chairs of that committee.
Slonneger stated that the committee would be sending a large, designated mailing regarding the house
and would also be canvassing the neighborhood this weekend, hopefully with a brochure about the
house. She said that CSWH would have articles coming out in Friday's paper about the house. Slonneger
added that the Johnson County Historical Society is coming on board as a caretaker for future
maintenance of the house.
Burford said that Marlin Engels has been hired to document the house by compiling a complete historic
and archaeological commentary. She added that on Friday at 12:30 p.m. at the house the asbestos siding
will be removed to see if an original front door will be revealed.
Burford said that the CSWH has discussed the viability of the house itself and has spoken with a house
mover, engineers, and architects regarding what would need to be done to the house. She said that the
committee has walked through the process regarding the building permit and the moving permit. Burford
said that two recommended sites will be discussed further at the committee's meeting later in the
evening.
Bennett said the estimate for moving the house is approximately $30,000, and half of that could
potentially come from an HRDP grant. She said that it might cost as much as $75,000 for restoration and
long-term maintenance.
Bennett said the CSWH is still looking for a location for the house and spoke to the Parks and Recreation
Commission at its meeting earlier in the evening. She said those Commission members are adamant
about having public input on the issue, especially from those neighbors who might be in the vicinity of the
house. Bennett said that therefore in the next few days there will be a campaign to get some input from
the Goosetown Neighborhood and from people who live near the Reno Street Park.
Bennett said there will be a meeting with the Parks and Recreation Commission at 6:00 p.m. next
Wednesday to look for a resolution about the potential location of the house. She said that if it is defeated
by the Parks and Recreation Commission, there is still the option of going to the City Council. Slonneger
added that the two City Council members-elect, Hayek and Wright, are in support of saving the house.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 6
Weitzel said that because this item is not on the Commission's agenda, the Commission could pass a
resolution of support but it might need to occur at a future meeting. Bennett asked if the Commission
could provide a letter of support to show that another sector is in support of saving this truly significant
house.
Weitzel asked if the Commission could provide a letter of support without having this item on its agenda.
Miklo said that this could be considered a public discussion item so that the Commission might be able to
provide a letter of support, although he would confirm this with the City Attorney's Office.
Ponto asked how this fits into the owner's timeline. Bennett said that one of the owner's conditions is that
the committee have a solid plan in place and is showing progress. She added that the CSWH has
concrete analysis by professionals, and the owner seems to have some leeway but not a lot.
Weitzel said that one can see that there is public support for this, with the CSWH set up and donations
already under way. He said that is a very positive sign and asked Commission members if there is
consensus for a letter of support.
Brennan asked if the letter would support the move or support a move to a particular location or
something else. Weitzel said the Commission could discuss the terms of the letter. Brennan said he is
hesitant about that, because the item is not on the agenda. He said that part of an open process is public
notice and public meetings and discussions. Brennan noted that there was at least one person at the
least meeting who was opposed to a move to the Reno Street Park. Weitzel said the support letter could
omit a specific location and be a very general letter of support.
Weitzel said there is some concern on the part of Commission members about the cost and amount of
restoration that would need to take place. He said that if people are willing to undertake that, however,
that is not the Commission's purview. Michaud asked who would own the structure. Bennett said that it
would be owned by the City, and the Johnson County Historical Society would be responsible for its
upkeep. She added that the Johnson County Historical Society has a good track record on managing
properties in comparable situations.
Weitzel said that in the past, the Commission has approved the concept of writing a letter, which was then
written by the chair and staff and then circulated for approval. Bennett said she would like to at least have
a letter of support in time for the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting next Wednesday. Weitzel
said the Commission should be able to give verbal approval of the concept, without a specific location
being specified. He said that as far as a letter being written, people seem to want to make it an agenda
item in order to have a vote.
Swaim said that she would be comfortable with whatever staff and the chair would pull together in a
general letter of support. She said the letter could be a broad letter of support suggesting that all avenues
be explored. Terdalkar said he would check with the City Attorney's Office regarding compiling a letter.
The consensus of the Commission was for staff and the chair to draft a letter of support to be reviewed by
the City Attorney's Office before being sent. Weitzel said that the CSWH has seen the Historic
Preservation Commission's support and can therefore verbally report back that support to other
commissions.
Bennett, Slonegger, and Burford asked that the letter be addressed to the Committee to Save Wetherby
House.
OTHER:
Weitzel said that in December or early January, the Commission holds a work session to compile a work
plan and submit it to City Council. He added that last year's work plan consisted mostly of updating the
Preservation Plan. Weitzel said that one item of interest is the CLG grant from the State Historical
Society, which should be announced around January 15th. He suggested that a survey of the near south
side to look for potentially eligible properties and potential districts be considered in the work plan.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 7
ITEMS OF CONSIDERATION:
Certificate of Appropriateness:
1012 East WashinQton Street. Terdalkar said that the owner of this property was served notice by the
Housing Inspection Division to remedy a situation identified as potentially hazardous. He said that the
structure seems to be an original structure and is shown on the 1920 Sanborn Map and listed as "two_
story auto."
Terdalkar showed photographs of the property and stated that it is certainly in a condition that requires
immediate attention. He said there was some tornado damage to the property. Terdalkar said that one
opinion was that the structure can be braced from inside and can be fixed; it is not gone beyond repair.
He said that in recent years, the owner put a new foundation in this structure that could be reused, and
there may be a need to repair one or two of the piers in the foundation.
Swaim asked if the building was leaning in two directions, as it appeared in the photograph. Terdalkar
said it is not leaning in two directions; it is leaning to the north only.
Terdalkar said the criteria for outbuilding demolition are the condition of the structure, integrity of the
structure, and architectural significance. He said that in terms of architectural integrity, this is probably
one of the better structures that the Commission has reviewed so far.
Terdalkar said that after the tornado, the owner approached the City and was advised to apply for grant
money. He said this would probably have qualified for the HRDP grant because of age and significance.
Terdalkar said the owner did not apply and has not addressed the issue since then. Weitzel said that after
July 1, the money was no longer available as it was appropriated back by the State.
Swaim asked if it is likely this building was originally a barn and then used for an auto in 1920 and after.
Terdalkar said that he thought that was likely. Weitzel agreed that this could have been a horse barn.
Swaim said that the fact that this was a barn makes it seem even more important.
Terdalkar said that the building needs work to make it accessible and usable. Weitzel said the owner has
been cited with a dangerous structure, so he needs to do something to remedy it. Terdalkar said that
something needs to be done very quickly.
Weitzel said that one of the remedies is to demolish the building, but the Commission has purview to
evaluate the significance because it's in a historic district. Terdalkar said that the Housing Inspection
Services' notice is to remedy the situation, so the options are to repair it to make it stable or demolish it.
Downing said that either way, it's an expense to the owner. Baker asked if the owner has indicated any
interest in restoring the building. Terdalkar said that the day he met with the owner, the owner was not
interested in saving the building. He said the application does not contain much information, and the
owner did not apply for an HRDP grant.
Terdalkar said that he spoke with the building inspector, who felt that metal braces could be used to
straighten and save the building. Terdalkar said that if the owner wants to make the building usable, he
can still keep the building on the site.
Weitzel said the Commission should discuss the significance of the building, because if the structure is
not significant, there is no point in making the owner maintain it. Swaim said that the building seems to
have significance. Weitzel said that there is a demolition by neglect ordinance that requires homeowners
to keep their buildings in a state of repair. He said that if the Commission finds the building to be
significant, the demolition option would be off the table. Weitzel said the owner would then be forced to
repair the building or face fines.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 8
Ponto said that it should be relatively inexpensive to brace the building to stabilize it, although it would
cost a lot more to restore the building. Miklo said that if the building is at least stabilized, a new owner in
the future might appreciate the building and restore it to use it for storage. He said that realistically, if the
Commission doesn't allow demolition, the owner will probably do the minimum to stabilize the building,
thereby potentially saving it for a future owner.
MOTION: Swaim moved to deny a certificate of appropriateness for the demolition of an
outbuilding at 1012 East Washington Street. Michaud seconded the motion. The motion carried on
a vote of 7-0.
Weitzel pointed out that the demolition was denied because of the historic significance and the venerable
nature of the structure.
Downing asked what recourse the owner would have regarding this decision. Weitzel said the
Commission's decision may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment.
PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT PRESERVATION PLAN:
Public hearing open:
Public hearing closed.
Michaud asked about suggestions that vinyl windows be reevaluated. Weitzel said there are
recommendations in the Preservation Plan update that the Commission relook at how windows are
treated in conservation districts and that there be some leniency.
Terdalkar said the packet includes a memorandum with two potential amendments to the plan. He said
that one amendment would be to add a paragraph to objective nine, goal two, to consider a revision to the
design guidelines to allow more flexibility in terms of materials. Terdalkar said another recommended
addition to goal one would extend the period of survey as we move forward in terms of the buildings that
meet the 50-year threshold. He said that as the threshold is moving, the Commission would also
reevaluate its position in terms of what is significant and what should be surveyed.
Weitzel said that he would also like to see the Commission adopt a standard procedure to evaluate
previously unconsidered substitute materials so that the process is not always so ad hoc. He said the
Commission should be proactive, not reactive, in adopting substitute materials. Weitzel suggested the
Commission look to the Historic Trust Forum, preservation architects, etc.
Terdalkar said there is a lot to look at in terms of revising the guidelines. He said that the process after
the tornado recovery was helpful to get some of the projects moving faster, and that could be
incorporated in the guidelines. Terdalkar said the Commission should look at revisions of the guidelines
realistically, not just for materials or small changes. Miklo said the Preservation Plan refers to potential
amendments to the guidelines in several places.
Michaud stated that she is very concerned about environmental impact. She said that if there are green or
recycled products, perhaps those could be used rather than less durable products such as wood. Swaim
asked if the Commission wanted to be that specific. She said that until those materials are truly tested
and there is some guidance from the Trust or the Secretary of the Interior, the Commission's job is to
work with the historic guidelines.
Weitzel said that the National Trust online forum has discussions about many topics, including substitute
materials. He said that the National Trust really doesn't like vinyl, because it's not a renewable resource
and doesn't last that long. Weitzel said that one of the greenest things an owner can do is to replace a
window that is in place. He said there is a wealth of data on that.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7,2007
Page 9
Miklo said that the draft Preservation Plan is being considered and adopted by the Commission, and the
details will come in the guidelines. He said the plan would then be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and from that Commission to the City Council for approval.
Weitzel said he feels the staff memorandum with the amendments should be adopted and included in the
Preservation Plan. He said he felt that it covered most of Ponto's concerns, and Ponto agreed.
MOTION: Michaud moved to adopt the amendments to the Preservation Plan as proposed in
staff's November 7th memorandum. Ponto seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-
O. with Brennan not votina on this motion. because he was brieflv out of the room.
MOTION: Swaim moved to recommend the draft Preservation Plan, as amended at tonight's
meeting, to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Brennan seconded the motion. The motion
carried on a vote of 7 -0.
Minutes for October 11. 2007.
Weitzel said that he had typographical corrections to submit.
Baker said that on page one, in the second paragraph under Certificate of Appropriateness, the last
sentence should read, "... sill of the windows will..."
Brennan said that on page eight, in the second to last paragraph, "1920" should be changed to "1930."
Weitzel said that on page five, in the second full paragraph, last sentence, "CRF 38" should be changed
to "36 CFR Part 800."
MOTION: Baker moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's October 11,
2007 meeting, as amended. Downing seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of7-0.
OTHER:
Discussion of a proposed telecommunication tower located on Hawk Ridqe Drive.
Terdalkar showed the location of a telecommunications tower to be located on Hawkridge Drive and
Highway One. He said that the most notable historic structure nearby is at 747 Benton Street. Terdalkar
said that the distance between the properties is fairly significance, and the topography is such that the
house is not visible from the site.
Terdalkar referred to a report from architectural historian Patricia Eckhart noting that the tower's
construction will not have an adverse effect. He said that it will be a stealth tower in that it will be installed
on a light pole. Terdalkar said that the light pole will be 50 feet in height. Miklo said there is a height limit
of 35 feet for the lamp. Terdalkar said the owner has not yet applied for a special exception. Miklo said
that staff would suggest through the special exception process that the light be mounted no higher than
35 feet.
Terdalkar said that a letter to the State Historical Society and to the applicant would need to be drafted in
order to state the Commission's opinion. The consensus of the Commission was to draft a letter stating
that the Commission finds no adverse effect so long as the tower is a stealth tower and the light is
mounted at 35 feet or less.
Swaim stated that the awards program went quite well and was handled very efficiently. She said that the
remarks were good and to the point, and the focus was on the buildings rather than on people walking
across a stage.
Weitzel said that some Commission members' terms would expire next year. He said that officer elections
would also need to be held early next year.
Historic Preservation Commission
November 7, 2007
Page 10
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte
s/pcd/mins/hpc/2007/11-07-07.doc
c
o
'iij
(/)
'E
E
o
()
C
~I'-
roO
~o
Q)N
(/) "
Q)I'-
.... ....
Q.Q)
U.o......
'C E......
OQ)Q)
->0>
,!!1 0 ro
IZQ.
C
o
UI
,~
E't:l
E ...
o 0
U (,)
CD
CO::
.2 CD .....
_(,)0
C'lSCO
~C'lSN
CD't:l
UI C
e CD
0.=
(,)et
'i:
o
-
.~
J:
l- I I I f:::!
S2 :>< :>< I :>< I I :>< >< :>< :>< :><
.... I I I 0
.... I I I
.... f:::! I I I
S2 :>< I :>< I I :>< :>< :>< :>< :>< ><
.... 0 I I I
.... I I I
-.t f:::! I I I
~ :>< I :>< I I :>< :>< :>< :>< :>< :><
Q 0 I I I
.... I I I
.... I I I f:::!
.... :>< :>< I :>< I I :>< :>< :>< :>< :><
......
Q I I I 0
.... I I I
l- I I I I f:::!
.... :>< :>< I I I I :>< :>< :>< :>< :><
...... I I I I 0
0'1 I I I I
0'1 I I I f:::! f:::!
...... :>< :>< I I I :>< >< :>< :>< :><
QO I I I 0 0
I I I
M I I I f:::! f:::!
.... :>< :>< I I I :>< :>< :>< :>< :><
...... I I I 0 0
l- I I I
QO I I I f:::!
M :>< 0 I I I :>< :>< :>< >< :>< ><
\Q I I I 0
I I I
M f:::! I I I f:::! f:::!
.... :>< I I I :>< :>< :>< :>< :><
...... 0 I I I 0 0
\l:) I I I
.... I I I f:::! f:::!
~ :>< :>< I I I :>< :>< :>< >< :><
I I I 0 0
In I I I
l- f:::! I I I f:::! f:::!
.... :>< I I I :>< >< >< :>< ><
iii 0 I I I 0 0
I I I
M I I I f:::!
.... :>< :>< I I I :>< :>< :>< :>< :>< :><
~ I I I 0
I I I
QO f:::! I f:::! f:::! I f:::!
S2 :>< :>< I :>< :>< :>< I :><
0 I 0 0 I 0
.., I I
QO I :>< f:::! I
S2 :>< :>< >< I >< :>< :>< I >< ><
I 0 I
M I I
E .~ 0\ 00 l- e I- 00 0\ I- 0\ e 0\ 00
e S2 S2 - S2 S2 e S2 e - S2 e
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 0;
OJ ~ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\
!:::l !:::l !:::l !:::l !:::l N !:::l !:::l N !:::l !:::l !:::l
f-<[..IJ ...... ......
M M M M M M M M M M M M
~
-;
C ll.lI 5 "0 .. ....
c c = -
~ .. 5 :c .. ..
<l) .. c 0 'c c 0 ~ 0 5 .l:l
8 ~ c '" U .c - '; 5
.. i: ~ C <J C 0 ';;
<<S ~ .. ~ 0 = OJ .- 0 ~ .;: 0
Z = = U ~ C ::; ::; i:l.. 00 Eo< Eo< ~
"0
<l) ...
ell <l)
;::l ~~.D
U "'" 8
~'E <l)
d ~:::E
dd~:::E~
~<l).DOO
e$<ZZ
~ < II II II
~II II f:::!:::E :
~><OOZ: