HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-12-2009 Historic Preservation Commission
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, February 12, 2009
City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street
Emma J. Harvat Hall
6:00 p.m.
A Call to Order
B. Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
c. Certificate of Appropriateness:
1. 1033 Woodlawn Avenue
D. Virtual Forum Update
E. Consideration of minutes for January 8, 2009
F. Other
G. Adjournment
Staff Report
Historic Review for 1033 Woodlawn Avenue
District: Woodlawn Historic District
Classification: Contributing
The applicants, Rhawn and Jen Denniston, are requesting approval for a proposed project at 1033
Woodlawn Avenue, a contributing property the Woodlawn Historic District. The applicants are seeking
approval to relocate/replace four windows on the east and south facades of the house to facilitate a
kitchen remodel.
February 6. 2009
Applicable ReRulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations
4.7 Windows
Staff Comments
This two-story cross gable house has a one-story porch with simple wood columns. A two-story
protruding bay adorns the eastern fac;:ade. The main cornice is wide, with partial returns and a
paneled frieze. Windows on the north and west facades are set in paneled surrounds topped with
narrow cornices broken by semicircular pediments. The windows on the south and east facades (the
"rear" facades) have much simpler surrounds.
The applicant is proposing to replace the windows in the kitchen and relocate one window. The
existing windows to be replaced are likely replacement windows and do not match the style or size of
the other windows on the house. The applicant has worked with the contractor to find windows that
compliment the style of the house and the existing window pattern, while accommodating the kitchen
remodeling. The proposed windows are similar in appearance to the windows seen on the rest of the
house, which are likely original windows.
On the east side of the house, the proposed new windows are double hung wood windows that match
the width and appearance of the second story windows. On the west side of the house, the proposed
new windows are side-by-side double hung windows to match the appearance of the other windows on
the house All of the proposed windows are shorter than other windows on the first level in order to be
located above a counter. It is not uncommon for kitchen windows to be shorter than other windows for
this reason. All new trim will match the existing trim.
In addition, to accommodate the kitchen remodel and the new counter top height, the applicant is
proposing to relocate one window. The window is being raised 8 inches and shifted 8 inches toward the
south. The new placement of the window is in keeping with the existing window pattern. Moreover,
this window was added in 1996 when a significant addition/alteration took place on the house.
The guidelines allow for the replacement of deteriorated windows. The proposed windows meet the
guidelines, provided the windows are wood or metal clad wood and the divided lights may be created
with muntin bars that are adhered to both sides of the glass or are true divided lights. The guidelines
also recommend that double hung windows be used unless an alternate style is original to the house.
In Staff's opinion, the proposed windows are consistent with the style of this house. Staff believes that
the proposed windows are more accurate to the style of house than the existing windows.
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 652 S Governor Street as presented
in the application with the following conditions:
· The windows must be either solid wood or metal-clad, solid wood double hung
windows, with either true divided lights or simulated divided lights with muntin bars
adhered to both sides of the glass, but not with snap in muntin bars;
· If metal-clad, solid wood windows are used, the sash color shall be dark to match the
existing windows; and
· Any siding repair or replacement necessary must match the existing siding in
dimension, profile, and material.
Apr ';cation for Historic Re~ · ~w
-'
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties
located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process. explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook. which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at:
www.;cgov.orgIHPhandbook
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During
the summer months. the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications
are due in the PCD Office by noon on Thursday two weeks prior to the meeting.
See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates.
For Staff Use: /
Date submitted ..........~..~..Z:.J?...J...........
o Certificate of No Material Effect
){ Certificate of Appropriateness
~ Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
g" Owner ..r.:~.~.~...4..kv.L....~.,,~.~.t~................
Phone;f ~.!...:.!~ ?.:.J..?:::r.1.. ................ .......... .............. .... .........
Add ress ..ID..l..:J. ....... .0I.?'Qdj.aw.~.........................................
1~'!!.:~;x:;:~b;.....'iP !.::':J.:::'tf"
/ em,;i ~~.,.,......j.....~...lZk4w.~y..el.ef.1.p..l:..CQ-!Y'
~ contrac;~..J;~.....:~.O.fX',..e.-r'''''''''''''''''''''''''' ~iS~~i:i;r~:~~~:I~:~ historic landmark
Add ress ........ ....Io...... .N.,....... ....l.r.\. n...................... ................. 0 R
..l.9..v.-!~~...4:~"'''I.......1A..........................Zi~.;?~~ [3'" This property is located in the:
P~c1~.....<e.~L.~..OrlP....................................................... 0 Brown Street Historic District
em';I..:r;"".~,t.v.1<~,~,...!'~Jt,[~.f.~~..~",.",.,:".""s, ., 0 College Geeen Hi"o," Dim'"
o Con,ult.n' .....I1.<;\{~..........'J.\10....~j.!).):... \....,.'1"" ",,, 0 Em College Stceet Hi'ton, Di"""
Addee"q:at.i3\o.ovXLV!? ''3:/215 B ~on~:~::::;~:~;'~:::,;"
.................................................................................Zip ...s............ ~odlawn Historic District
Phone...5..2.\.-.::.....:d..::J...Z.5s.......................................... 0 Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District
e~~;;..i3..~?o.~[:~.::;:::~~~:b;;;;:[::;;!::
l ) 01 1/ L....Ja r" e I J
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
o Site plan
o Floor plans
o Building elevations
~Photographs
o Product information
o Other ..............................................................................
If the proposed project entails an addition. a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure. please submit a
site plan. floor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently
describe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
I ;>? Wi
Address of property ......Q.,J...>............D.Q.tl.l.~.fY.r.1......................
..................jo.~~'!::.....~.~.................................................................
'2,' ~O
Use of property.....I...C.J..L~.........................................................
D d ('fk -"-) /3' 10 . ~~~~;~ "-Jt:.llf:V'/~r.., '
ate constructe I nown ................f................................ .. .:>r..r 17'if
Within the district, this property is classified as:
~ Contributing
o Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Pr..9fect Type
13" Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations. new
decks. porch reconstruction. baluster repair or similar)
o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch.
chimneys, decorative trim. baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not
change its appearance
o Other..............................................................................................
Project description . i / ., . j' ,
'li:.!dCl.(!.t?.~~~Lt(it;;fl.io4;e.tyIMJVd.~mm..
1~~~~~~~~~~~~::~L.~dQ.w..m.
........................................................................u..........................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................,...............................................................
~:r:::b;:s:;21QlhaLcl~J(/st.!l(fJY./.tJdLdQIYf?mm.
"'....a:n.d... !- - ~.....CS.e:r....t&Li.a..,..,7iL).....,~T......S.d/I!Cb.u..'?:../(,4-,..r../.,~~~........................
~ ~ ... J. ~..
.r...L..A.-/.-s;:.1/.U..I,y)':kr!.QW9..t..................m....
..........ji;i..........';..../...................""."."......;..'.....'....".,....;........:;.:'....".,..~...........,.........'''.................."........"....,.......'............",.."...,...................."..
'YC:;1.<4if;"'/k..:z.1cJ4rtj""'-gm.7'
m...a....v....(,....d..........':!4/..~..d..~..J1/,.,....~rJ/......".h:........r4.1...$....'Yi...........:...~.,',.~...~kl.,f1..~....
...........?~....7G........q".~.C.\.)..M..I...d..4;:1...~.......c.o...~..~:f...g,..IC..q:.v..f..............................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Exterior appearance changes
:::::::::::~. ~;;;:;:;;~cd;.;;;:;.........:;.ZZ[l.!.;;~ld.~~..::::::::.~:;s:t~:::;:::~:CjZ.l':::::::;~..:':::t!..c G.r
"I ~. .,.., j ~/'
.."."...?f//PL".dr2..Iy~...~............ .., ." i ,./Y~;~,w.:Ii1!.(l.Q.W.~.k.cL./L~~:;;Fw
......... .s:A:o. .t;.t..'-.f:...dM... ...:ta........ . ..I../oL........... ..ea..kl./..l1!t.t.;.. .r:."..... .......... .~. .7... ........ ........
- . /,. ." , ~ - ", ,. ~ -
......-S:"a1..<.:.....11.4/.kd.O.M..&.....w..t.l.!...rJ:/;~.!.v...W.l.... .....tyLVri.~.0.:.-!:2....Q::J.,..............
.....;?ds:.ifJ.f..;'1;..tlIMtL..Ati.{eiUU1clf.4;.........j;i........:........';;l"
........Cl/L<....SrJ.. /.c..7K..s:/i..,e, ......I.M.I......d.o.0<.s... ..I1d./I......... .......... Co. iff. IM..,.. ....w
:::::::::f::.~:1.ftfjf::.;;::~fL:?f!;.~~~~7/:::::i:l~i7jtj,
. ........~.b./..m.... ........... ................ .... ........ ................' ............. .............. .......... ............V
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
East side of 1033 Woodlawn
Current
Current
Proposed
South side of 1033 Woodlawn
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
THURSDAY, January 08,2009
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
PRELIMINARY
MEMBERS PRESENT: Thomas Baldridge, Esther Baker, William Downing, Lindsay Bunting Eubanks,
Pam Michaud, Jim Ponto, Ginalie Swaim, Alicia Trimble, Frank Wagner
STAFF PRESENT: Christina Kuecker, Robert Anderson
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Warner
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Bunting Eubanks called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
712 Ronalds Street.
Kuecker said the project on Ronalds Street was deferred from the previous meeting. She said it's a
three-part project including window replacement, enclosure of a portion of a porch with screens and
addition of windows on the garage. She said it's a non-contributing house in the Brown Street Historic
District on Ronalds Street.
Kuecker said the applicant proposes to replace the second story window with the same windows that
were approved for the addition in 2007. The applicant proposes to use some of the second story
windows for use in the garage. And he wants to enclose part of the porch along the side door with a
screened in porch. The applicant proposes to have screened in porch about 2.5-3 feet away from
balustrade and have a 30-inch high base wall with sided base wall with same dimension as siding on the
house. Kuecker said staff sees other options, such as moving screen wall to line up with balustrade and
eliminating the thirty inch base wall or just leaving the screened in portion where it is and extending
screens from ceiling to floor with grid or support to allow visibility and structural support along bottom
portion. The third portion of the project is to add windows to side of garage. The garage is shared so
applicant only has control over half the garage.
Kuecker said staff recommends approval of project as presented in application with the condition that the
replacement windows on second story match existing windows in type, size, sash width, trim, and overall
appearance, and that the mullion width must be maintained between the double windows. Staff
recommends allowing applicant the option of constructing the screened porch as presented in the
application, eliminating the 30-inch high base wall and extending the screen the entire distance between
floor and ceiling, or moving the screen wall to directly behind the porch railing and eliminating the 30-inch
high base wall. Kuecker said if the third option is chosen, the screened door may be placed on the south
wall to provide access through the screened in portion of the porch.
Bunting Eubanks asked if the applicant would like to address the Commission.
Robert Warner, the applicant, said the reason for the access between was because there is a problem if
the screening is put behind the railing, then the railing cannot be accessed, which is a problem with the
continual need to repaint. Warner said the porch is really wide, added in the 1970s. He said the higher
addition was added in the 1960s, and the rear addition in 2007. Warner said he was thinking of trying to
replicate the existing wall with the panels along, to blend more with the character of the walls and wrap
around. Ceiling light fixtures in the porch area was a consideration.
Warner discussed the window damage. He said the windows themselves are rotted. Warner said the sill
plates between the two double-windows are rotted out, that there is just a hole. He said moisture comes
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
January 8, 2009
Page 2 of 7
down between windows and collects on the sill plate and the only thing holding the windows together is
pai nt.
Warner discussed a screen system suggested by his contractor called Screen Tight.
Kuecker asked the applicant to explain the system to the Commission.
Warner said it's a plastic framing system that fits on the framing. He said the panels are done with a
cover piece over the panel. The benefit, he said, is if damage is done, a single panel can be removed
and replaced. Warner said he and the contractor are flexible in the method chosen. The covers currently
on the window are vinyl, suffering from UV damage.
Michaud asked to which windows the applicant is referring.
Warner said all windows, then clarified that the ones on the right have the old, full-covered storm windows
with hooks in the top that slide into place. But the ones in the front were replaced with vinyl years ago
and are falling apart. He said he would like to replace those to get a nicer look, emphasizing his desire to
salvage and keep trim pieces. He said there is a red strip above the windows that he wants to keep.
Baldridge asked if the proposal is to take the windows from the front and place them on the garage.
Warner clarified that the intent is to take the windows from the side, the smaller windows of the same
height as the non-functional window on the garage. The goal is to bring in more light to the garage for
use as an art studio. He said they would not be visible because there is a shed on the side.
Swaim asked about the height of the balustrade for the proposed 3D-inch high base wall.
Warner said the height is the same as the balustrade, the intent being to keep a straight line and to have
a wider sill to place things like glasses. He said he intends to use cement board to blend, like has been
done to other portions of the house. He said one could barely tell the difference.
Michaud asked whether the two windows on the first floor will stay, the ones going down to where the
proposed screen will go.
Warner confirmed this. He said he wants to get away from those.
Michaud asked whether he is planning to leave a few inches of space.
Warner said more than that, about two feet. He said the hope is to match up with third column.
Michaud suggests lining it up with the solid wall, to drop it down so it is shorter and less prominent and
tied in better with the windows.
Warner said that is good idea.
Warner said the driveway is ice, so he uses the porch to safely get from front to rear. He said in addition
to the screen door proposed for the north side of the porch, he would like to put a screen door on the
south end to pass through. He said he will submit another sketch for that proposed door.
Bunting Eubanks said a problem in the past has been in keeping the outward appearance the same. She
emphasized that for windows, to make sure the mullion spacing is the same and the framing is the same.
Warner said he wants to keep the framing and to try to salvage as much as possible to keep the price
down, but the sill whole plate is gone so those have to be replaced.
Bunting Eubanks said it's okay to replace, but it has to keep the same spacing.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
January 8, 2009
Page 3 of 7
Warner wondered about the section between the windows going on the outside. A retailer told him with
one type of window, which is an insert, there might be a little bit of space, but that would be done on the
outside. But even then the mullion between the windows would stay the same.
Warner addressed the issue of egress for the bedrooms on the east and west side of the house. He said
the windows are only 2'8" wide, so those will need to be widened. The ceiling height is only five feet. He
said he can get a casement window with insert to achieve the appearance of a double-hung window.
Michaud said the Commission has approved the casement window with insert before to achieve double-
hung look.
Bunting Eubanks said egress receives priority.
Warner said it will look the same, just a little wider but that can be made up in the interior frame. He said
what he needs to do is maintain the width of the outside framing.
Bunting Eubanks added that the mullion also needs to be maintained. She said there was a case where
mullion was not kept.
Warner says he heard about that.
Bunting Eubanks emphasized the outside appearance needs to remain the same. She said the fiber
cement board is acceptable, that there are many materials which are acceptable which people are
surprised by.
Warner said that was a wise decision to allow use of fiber cement board. He said his neighbor applied
fiber cement board long ago and it looks the same as when first applied.
Bunting Eubanks said the Commission has guidelines that come from the Secretary of the Interior and
those permit fiber cement board.
Warner says his house is a noncontributing property, that it is a mix of styles. He said he also found a car
jack holding up a portion of his porch which is accessible through the skirting of the porch.
Bunting Eubanks said the clarification of these issues is why the Commission wished his presence at the
meeting. In the past, if there has been no communication with the applicant, there are problems. She
asked for questions or further discussion from Commission members.
Ponto asked about size of the upper windows that would be moved to the garage compared to the
existing garage windows.
Warner said the size of the windows is the same.
Michaud asked whether the plan was to move three.
Warner said there are two windows on the upper portion of the house on each side. So, there are four
windows. He said the window in the worst condition will be discarded.
Bunting Eubanks asked about whether the motion needs to be amended to include the two screened
porch doors.
Kuecker said yes, the motion language should be amended. She also said it should include language
about casement window for egress that has the appearance of a double-hung.
Michaud offered suggestion for screen, to have heavier mesh to protect screen against pets.
Warner said he knows about the heavier mesh but that even though it doesn't puncture, the pre-molded
system of installation warps the screen, so he would prefer not to use it.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
January 8, 2009
Page 4 of 7
Bunting Eubanks asked for further discussion, or a motion.
Warner asked if there is any problem with the plastic panelized system.
Kuecker said she thinks guidelines say it should be wood.
Bunting Eubanks said the Commission tends to go against plastic. She said that only certain synthetics
have been tested and are therefore acceptable, such as fiber cement board. This comes from the
Secretary of the Interior.
Warner said the suggestion came from contractor because it is easier to assemble, but the use of wood is
fine, that he didn't think the plastic would be acceptable.
Bunting Eubanks said the guidelines are also set up so the materials last.
MOTION: Ponto moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 712 Ronalds
Street as presented in the application, with the condition that the replacement windows match the
existing windows in type, size, sash width, trim, and overall appearance. For any window that is
required to meet egress requirements, a casement window may be used provided that it has a
wide muntin to simulate the appearance of a double hung window. The applicant also has the
option of constructing the screened portion of the porch as presented in the application;
changing the height or eliminating the base wall; and adding a second screened door. Everything
must be constructed of wood or fiber cement board. Michaud seconded the motion. The motion
carried on a vote of 9-0.
VIRTUAL FORUM UPDATE:
Bunting Eubanks said she has prepared a draft power point for the virtual form to present to the
Commission. The Commission discussed the power point and other details of the Forum.
Kuecker made notes of the changes requested by the Commission.
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 11. 2008.
MOTION: Swaim moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's December
11, 2008 meeting, as written. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 9-0.
OTHER:
Bunting Eubanks asked about eliminating the cover page from the Commission packets to be more
environmentally friendly.
Baker, Ponto and Michaud said they are fine with it. Ponto said all the information is included at the top
of the agenda page.
Kuecker asked if everyone is okay receiving minutes by email. Positive responses from the Commission
were received.
Kuecker asked if individuals want to receive their entire packets via email.Trimble. Downing, Baker,
Michaud, and Wagner indicated they wish to receive their packets via email.
Bunting Eubanks reminded the Commission that Kuecker presents all the relevant information during the
meetings.
Kuecker said that individuals can change their mind if receiving packets or minutes via email does not
work for them.
Bunting Eubanks said it is a good idea to have at least one printed agenda at the meeting.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
January 8, 2009
Page 5 of 7
Downing said probably the most important thing about receiving the pack in the mail is the reminder of the
meeting date and time.
Kuecker said the agenda could still come via postal mail.
Michaud wondered about whether a postcard could be used for the agenda.
Swaim asked about an email notification of meeting dates. She wondered if that would serve the same
purpose of Kuecker asking for a quorum.
Kuecker said it could be either. She said this is still being figured out.
Kuecker said one advantage of sending packets via email is the packets would be received the same day
rather than waiting to receive the packet in postal mail.
Bunting Eubanks asked whether Commission members had a preference for when to hold the forum.
Michaud asked about President's day, whether City hall would be closed.
Bunting Eubanks said the forum could be held at City Hall. She said her idea would be to have the forum
on the second or fourth Thursday of the month to maintain the normal schedule.
Kuecker said she didn't think the Commission could replace a regular meeting to hold the forum.
Bunting Eubanks said then the fourth Thursday would work at the end of February.
Swaim said February is a good month because people are starting to look at doing work on their houses.
Michaud asked if it would be good to have it on President's Day because people would have more time.
She asked if City Hall is locked.
Kuecker said she doesn't know about holidays.
Baker asked about when the letters normally are sent out. Kuecker said normally the letters are sent in
April, but they can be sent anytime. She said last year the letters were sent out too late because nobody
was hired yet for her position.
Bunting Eubanks suggested the fourth Thursday in February for the date of the forum.
Downing asked about the slide presentation showing a picture of the Old Brick church. He said he thinks
people might be confused and think that is the location of the forum.
Kuecker said in order to have the forum televised it has to take place at the Iowa City Library or City Hall.
She said she'll make sure the invitation is clear.
Kuecker asked if there are any comments about the Certified Local Government report to the state that
was sent to the Commission members. Swaim indicated that Wetherby is spelled without the letter 'a'.
Swaim asked about question number two in the report regarding the nomination of the Wetherby House
to the National Register.
Kuecker said the house has been approved by the state committee and will go to the National Park
Service for consideration.
Anderson said that the information about the Wetherby House will be left in the report to indicate that the
house has been moved even though the report asks for properties listed on the National Register and the
Wetherby House has only been nominated to this point. Swaim asked about question number five, letter
c in the report, whether the annual Historic Preservation Awards should acknowledge collaboration with
Friends of Historic preservation and Johnson County Historic Preservation Commission.
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
January 8, 2009
Page 6 of 7
Anderson said he added text to question eight in the report, a question that was unfinished. He said
since contractors have not yet been notified district requirements he will amend that language.
Swaim asked if it matters whether the language reads 'Historical Society' or 'SHPO'.
Kuecker said she doesn't think so. She said she also included information on two things. One is an
invitation to the Friends of Historic Preservation annual meeting to take place at the end of January which
will focus on historic paint by David Arbogast. The other is a Growing Sustainable Communities
conference in Dubuque. She said if several Commission members are able to go she could probably
arrange for a planner there to give a historic tour of the downtown. She said if any Commission members
are interested to let her know now.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 7:06 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Robert Anderson
S/pcd/mins/hpc/2009/hpc 1-08-09.doc
r:
.2
U)
U)
E
E
o
o
r:
o
+:
('\S
>
I..
CI)
U)
CI)
I..
Q..
(J
.i:
o
-
.!!?
J:
'C
I..
o
(J
CI)
a:
CI) 0)
(J 0
r: 0
('\S N
'C
r:
CI)
-
-
oCt
co ,
e x x xx , x x x xx
,
,... ,
'" ~ 0) 0 ..- ~ 0) 0 0) 0 0)
E ~ ~ ~ ..- ..- ..- 0 ..- ~ ..- ~
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
Q3 "a. 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
f-X C\J ~ ~ C\J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-- Cry
LlJ M M M M M M M M M
C
Q) Cllll l'G
Cl E 'tl ...
'tl COX ::l E~ Q)
Q) ";:: ... .c C .c: l'G 0 C
E 'tl Q) ~ l'G U .c: - "iij E Cl
oX .c III u C
<<l iii l'G 0 ::l ... 0 ~ ";:: ~
Z IJ:I IJ:IQ w i: :ii Q. U)I-
-0
Q)
en
:J
u
X
W
~
~~a3
C C en
Q)Q).o
enen<(
Q).o
.. ct <( II
~II II!:!;!
~xoo