HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-29-2009 Historic Preservation Commission
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Thursday, May 28, 2009
City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street
Lobby Conference Room
6:00 p.m.
A Call to Order
B. Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
C. Certificate of Appropriateness
a. 428 S. Governor Street
b. 320 College Street
D. Consideration of minutes for May 14, 2009
E. Other
F. Adjournment
Staff Report
May 28. 2009
Historic Review for 428 S Governor St
District: Governor- Lucas Street Conservation District
dassification: Contributing
The applicant, Martha Greer, is requesting approval for a proposed project at 428 S. Governor St, a
contributing property the Governor- Lucas Street Conservation District. The applicant is seeking approval to
for several projects associated with a kitchen remodel and additional remodeling work
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations
4.1 Foundations
4.5 Siding
4.7 Wmdows
4.8 Doors
4.9 Porches
Staff Comments
This house was built in c. 1885-95 and features a complex gable and hip roof with irregular
massing. It is currently clad in replacement siding. The house retains its original porch,
fenestration, and offset gables.
The applicant is proposing several alterations in order to accommodate a kitchen remodel and
general renovation of the property.
Siding
The applicant is proposing to remove the as bestos replacement siding and restore the wood siding that is
underneath. Any portions of the siding that are rotted or missing will be replaced with new wood siding to
match. The applicant is still deciding if they would like to undertake this portion of the project, but would
like to obtain approval at this time, so when they make their decision, they will not have to submit another
application.
The guidelines encourage the removal of synthetic siding and repairing the historic wood siding and trim.
Windows
The applicant is proposing to remove the kitchen window on the north wall and fill in the opening with
siding to match either the existing asbestos siding or wood if they decide to remove the asbestos.. The
applicant is also proposing to remove the window on the east wall and add a bank of three windows to this
elevation. The new windows are double-hung, metal-clad, wood windows.
The guidelines generally discourage the filling in of windows; however, Staff believes that since this window is
not prominent from the street and is not located on the primary portion of the structure, it is not detrimental
to the architectural integrity of the house to eliminate the north window.
The guidelines also allow for the addition of windows that match the type, proportions, trim, and appearance
of the historic windows, provided that the new windows are in a location that is consistent with the window
pattern of the building or buildings of similar architectural styles. In Staff's opinion, the bank of three
windows is consistent with the architectural style, if the new windows have trim that matches the trim on the
other windows. In addition, these windows are on the back elevation of the house, and will not be
inconsistent from the window pattern on the rest of the house.
Door
The applicant is proposing to alter two door openings. The first involves removal of double French doors on
the south wall of the kitchen and replacement with a single French door. The second involves removal of an
unusable door on the north side of the house. This door is not functional because at some point, the
basement stairs were reconfigured and the landing for the door was eliminated. The applicant would like the
option of either replacing this door with a window or filling in the opening all together.
The French doors that the applicant proposes to replace with a single door were recently installed and are not
consistent with the historic character of the house. In Staff's opinion, a single door would be more in
keeping with the architectural style than the existing double French doors.
The guidelines generally discourage filling in door openings; however, staff believes that since the door on the
north side is no longer functional, replacement with a window or filling in the opening would be appropriate.
Foundation
The applicant is proposing to make some repairs to the existing foundation under the kitchen. Failing mortar
joints will be re-tuck pointed below grade. Open joints above grade will also be tuck-pointed.
The guidelines encourage repairing historic foundations rather than replacing them. The tuck-pointing
should be with a soft mortar that is appropriate for the soft historic masonry/block In Staff's opinion, if the
mortar used is of a similar density, color, and joint profile, this project will have no material effect on the
property.
Porch
The applicant is proposing to make some repairs to the front porch footings. They propose to jack up and
level the northwest comer of the porch, remove the more modem concrete blocks and replace with blocks
that match the existing blocks and foundation more closely.
The guidelines encourage the replacement of non-historic materials and replacement with more appropriate
materials. In Staff's opinion, the proposed blocks are more historically accurate.
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 428 S Governor Street as presented in the
application with the following conditions:
. The trim on bank of three windows match the trim of the existing windows;
. The applicant having the option of using a window in place of the north door or filling in
the door opening. If a window is used, it shall be a solid wood or metal-clad solid wood
double hung window; and
. The mortar used for tuck-pointing must match the density, color, and joint profile of the
existing mortar.
Ap 'ication for Historic Rev'w
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties
located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process. explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at:
www.;cgov.org/HPhandbool<
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month, During
the summer months. the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications
are due in the PCD Office by noon on Thursday two weeks prior to the meeting.
See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates.
For Staff Use: t::.. l' 0/_ t:)
Date submitted ....~.. ...(LO........................
Cl Certificate of No Material Effect
rj{ Certificate of Appropriateness
Cl Major review
Cl Intermediate review
Cl Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
o Owner .~.~.~~.~..~~.~~.~..........,.................,..........,.....................
Phone.. (~.~.~). ?~.~ .~~~~!..................... .................................... .....
Address .. ~~.q .~. .~~.~~~~?~. .~~. ....... .........................................
.................................................................................zip...................
. mcsgreer@yahoo.com
email................................................................................................
o Contractor ............................................................................ ....
Address...... ............................................. ........... ............................
.................................................................................zip...................
Phone.... ... ... ...... ............. .... ...................... ........... ... ..... ....................
email................................................................................................
o Consultant .............. ....................................................... ............
Add ress ....................... ........................................................ ...........
.................................................................................zip...................
Phone.................................................. ...... ......................................
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
o Site plan
o Floor plans
o Building elevations
o Photographs
o Product information
o Other ..... ...... ............. ................................ ......................
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure. please submit a
site plan, floor plans, building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently
describe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
Address of property .~.?~..?~.~:':'.~:.~~.~..?..~.......................................
Use of property ..~.~~!9.~.~!!~~............. ................. ........... ..... ......... ......
. 1910
Date constructed (If known)...............................................................
Historic Designation
o This property is a local historic landmark
OR
D This property is located in the:
o Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
o Longfellow Historic District
o Summit Street Historic District
o Woodlawn Historic District
o Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
o Contributing
o Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Project Type
EJ Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement. skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks. porch reconstruction. baluster repair or similar)
o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not
change its appearance
o Other ............................ ........ ................................................ ...... ....
Project description
1. We would like to re~odel the..~~~?~~.~..i.~.~~!~..~~~.~:..T~~..~!~?~~.~..i.~.?~.~~~.~.~~.~..~!~.~..?~..~~.i.~.~.?'~.~~:..!~~.p"I.~~..~.?~..~~!.~............
............................................... ................ .
remodel includes the removal of a small window on the north side of the kitchen (see photo #1 & 3), the removal of a
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
window from..the.. .e. .a.s~. ~.i.d. .e... ?f..t. .h. .~..k..~~~.~~.~ ..(~~.~.P~.?~.?. ~~!. ~.~~.. ~.~p..I.~~~~.~~.~. ~!. ~.~~~..~~~.~?~. ~.i~~..~.~.~~. .?~.~~.~~.~..~.~~~~~~. ~~~.~.
.......................... ..... .. ,- .
floor plan and Quote #4928 for more information), and the replacement of double french doors on the south side of the
.................................................;...................................................................................................................................................................................................
kitchen (see photo #3) with a single french door (see floor plan).
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
2. In addition to the kitchen remodel, the foundation underneath the kitchen will be repaired. Please refer to the proposal
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.~.~ .~~.~~.p.~. ~?~~~~~.~~.i~~. .~?~. ~?~~.. ~~~~~~.~~.i.?~:..!~~. ~.~~.~..~?~.~.~~~. .~~p~.i.~ .!~.. ~~. .P..~.?~.?.~~..~ .~.. ~:............... ................. ..... ............................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................'
. ~.:. ~~p..~~~. .~.~~. .~~.~~~~~. ~~!~. .~~.?~.~.p.?~~~:.. ~~~.~~.~..~~~~~ .~~ .~~~..p.~?P..~~.~~ .~y...~~~~p..~. ~.?~.~.~~~~~i.?~ .!~~. .~~~.~. !~!?~~~~i.~~ :.!.~.~... ........
. ~.~~.~. ~?~ .~.~.i.~. ~~p~.i.~.!~. .~~. .p.~.~~?~. .~.:~. :.......... .......................... ........................................... ................... ........................................ ................. ................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.~:. ~.~.?~~~ .~~~~:. .Y'!~. ~~~!~. !!~~. ~~. .~.~.~.~. .~~~.~p.~!~~. .<:>.~.~i.~~~~. r.~.~~~~~~ .~~!~. ~~~r. .~.~?. ~~p.!~~!~~. !~. ~!~~. ~. ~!~~~~. ~~.~.~. .~.i.~.i.~.~....
.~~. T.~~~~. ~!.!~~!~~ ..~!~!~~). .?~. ~~.~.?y.i.~.~. .~~~. ~~~.~.~ ~~. ~~pl.~?i.~.~.. ~~ .~.i~~. .~~!!. ~~~. ~.~!~~~ ~~. ~~~!~~. ~I~.~.~.i~.~. .~~~ .~~~~ .~~~T.~. .i~~!~~.
Materials to be used
.!3.~~~.~..~~.. 9~.?~~..~~?~. .f.?~. ~~~.~!r.'.~.?~. ~p..~~~f.i.?~:.................................................... ............................. ...................... .......................................
. !3.~~~.~. .~~. ~.~.~..~~~~!?f. .~?~~~~.~~~!?~. g~.~~~. f.?:'. !.':~f?~~~~.i.?..~. .~~~.~:.~.~~.~. .~.~~. ~~?~.~~..~~. .~~. .~~.~9.. .?.~. .~~.~. .!.~~~~. !?~~.?~.: ...........
... ........ .... ................. ,..... ............................ ...... ..... ...... ....... ................ .............................. ...... ...~.... ...... .... ............. ............. ................... ......... ......... ...... ................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Exterior appearance changes
.~:..~.~~.?~.~!. ~!.~~~. .~.?~~. .~~?~.~.~~~.~~..~~..~~.~. ~.i.~~~.~~..~.~~.~~. ~!. .~~~..~.?~.~~). ~.~~.~~P..I.~~.~~~.~~.~~~~..~~.I.I. :.'!:!.~ .~.~~.~? ..I.i.~~......... .........
to match the siding to the existing siding.
........................................................................................................................................................................................-............................................................
.~:..~~~.~~.~~.~!.~~~. .~.~~~ .~~~.~..~~~.~~.~ .~~. .~~.~. .~i.~~~~~.~.~~..~~p..I.~~.~T..~~.~. ~.i.~~..~. .~~.~~..~~ .~~.~~.~ .~~~~.~~.~:... ............ ............. ... .................
3. Removal of double~french doors in the kitchen and replacement with a single-french door.
........~................................... .............................. .................................................. ........................................................................................................... ....
These changes will allow for more counter, cabinet and appliance space in the kitchen and will provide more view to
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
the backyard.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. Removal of door on the north side of the house. This door has no function. On the interior of the house, the door
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
leads onto the basement stairs. There is no landing on these stairs so the door cannot be used as a point of entry. .
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Repair ofthe front porch footings. Currently, the front porch is partially held up by a stack of concrete blocks. We
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
would like to remove these concrete blocks and install older blocks that are more appropriate to the historic style of the
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
. ~~~~: ..~~~. ~~~~~~ .~::~. .!~~.~. :~.i~~. ~~. ~.~.~. .p.~~~~:. .~~~. ~~~!~. ~~. .~?~. ~~. !~~.~. .<:>.~ .~~.~. ~~p'.I~.~~.~~~~. ~~~?~. ~~y'I.~.............................
r
I
11
,""r-
()
~
1,,1/ i~ll
['Ilia
I
I
rn,
,",,'
\,\:" ~
~l< 1("
~~
--' -",\
\.2;\
~
-~,
t~
L \;Vl)O?1
('>
'"
'j\
~+
S
0,
~,,,...
....?,:
:5
,~\,
~"
,)
/'
/"
[,'4DIGI i I ~]1
I I I I I 1-
f.t
:&'
rr
t
~
~
~
~
\S"'
'q\
(f,
~j
@
@
C):
1'--\\ Ii'\" '"
"("},.'
,~
// '--!~)
()
f-L
~6~~rnor St projecMark Russo Kitchen and Bath Design1st FloorFFo~~~~e~
Iowa City, IA 614 Clark St. Mark Russo
Iowa Cltv, IA May 7 2009
Revision A 3194300038 3/4('=1'0"
OJ
!\' v
j ,
( . '
~ .'.:..... . / ."-
,
-:;f-;;.~
Photo #1
Kitchen windows - east side and north side.
Northeast corner of foundation (for repair)
Photo #2
Window on east side of kitchen.
Photo #3
Double-french doors in kitchen.
Inside shot of north window in kitchen
Photo #4
Front porch view: On the left and right side of the stairs are the concrete
blocks.
Photo #5
Front porch view: Example of older blocks to be used to replace concrete
blocks.
. /;ae;
.<~:b1!ii.;
';,~~
:~~
Photo #6
View of north side door.
Another view of front porch concrete blocks.
Photo #7
Inside view of side door -It is on the right side of the picture (covered in
plastic)
PROPOSAL
Stumpf Construction Services Inc
2975 Hwy 22 E P.O. Box 130
Riverside, Iowa 52327
319- 648-3602 (PHONE), 319- 648 2902 (FAX)
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO:
Martha Greer
530 S Governor St
Iowa City Ia 52240
PHONE
319-541-5997
DATE
5-12-09
We hereby submit labor, material and equipment for the following work at 428 S Governor St.
In the coal room, north east room in the basement, spot tuck-point the failing mortar joints and
some of the more open joints around the inside of the remainder of the basement. We also do
some open joints above grade on the outside. $2167.00
At the north west comer ofthe front porch, jack and shore this corner of the porch, remove the
newer concrete blocks and install older blocks that are more like the other existing blocks
under the porch. $538.00
Payment to be made as follows:
Upon completion and receipt of invoice.
All material is guaranteed to be as specified. Any alteration
Or deviation from above specifications requested by owner
involving extra costs will executed as additional work and
will become an extra charge over and above the proposal. All
agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond
our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary
insurance. Our employees are fully covered by Workman's
compensation insurance.
Submitted by: ~:l!:I::O .sl hyf / v'J
TERRY STUMPF, PRESIDENT
Note: this proposal may be withdrawn by us ifnot accepted within
30
days.
ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL - The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and hereby accepted. You are
authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above upon receipt of invoice.
Date of acceptance:
SIGNATURE
IF YOU AGREE TO THIS PROPOSAL, PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN ONE COPY.
-
-1>>:[ ',/("I> .r.;,..-IlI-.., {ll.'1iJ
.lIt,... .11.. Jo!.........' l\ylL.l1.
\"\""1')"tdo"j(,.Is. It'lt:
Knebel Windows Inc.
700 S. Capitol Street
Iowa City, IA 52240
Phone: 319 338.1712
Fax: 319 338-1904
CQ prj #: 4928
Sold To: 67
CASH CONTRACTOR
System #: 0
Dealer Prj #: 4928
Customer ID:
Phone:
Fax:
Delivery
Instructions:
Shipping
Instructions:
QUOTE: 4928
QUOTE DETAIL
Project Number: 4928
Printed: 5/7/2009 9:14:30 AM
Order Date:
5/7/2009
Valid Date:
6/7/2009
Ship To: 1
KNEBEL WINDOWS INC.
700 S. CAPITOL STREET
IOWA CITY, IA 52240
Phone: 319338-1712
Drop Ship:
Fax: 319338-1904
Schield Family Brands. Proposes to Furnish Products as Stated Below.
._________._.....__.--6!!_\,!!!it~__yjewed from_s:_xter~__._
Item Number:
Quantity:
Total Jamb To Jamb:
Total Rough Opening:
1
1
76 X 491/8
77 1/16 X 49 5/8
0 0 0
D D D
PO:
JOB NAME:
LOCATION:
Page 1 of 1
Weather Shield
Double Hung Tilt
Rectangle
Product ID-810
Product Arrangement-3 Wide
Sizing Method-Nominal Glass Size
Nominal Glass Size-20 X 20
Nominal Glass Width-20
Nominal Glass Height-20
Overall Jamb Width-76
Jamb Height-49 1/8
Overall RIO Width-77 1/16
R/O Height-49 5/8
Glass Width-19 7/8
Glass Height-19 11/16
Operating Code-Operating
Operating Code 2-0perating
Operating Code 3-0perating
Unit ~rice:
Exterior Frame Finish-Aluminum Clad
Exterior Sash Finish-Aluminum Clad
Aluminum Paint Finish-Standard
Exterior Color-White
Glass Type-Zo-E Shield 5
Gas-Inert
Lite Configuration-1 Lite
Sash Lift Options-No Finger Pull Rout
Screen/Storm-Full Screen
Screen/Storm Color-White
Per Unit:
Ex!. Price:
$1.060.14..___ $1.060.14
Net Amount:
State Taxes:
Cty Taxes:
Local Taxes:
Taxes(Other):
J0~g_ Ctlarges:
Grand Total:
$1,060.14
$53.01
$0.00
$10.60
$0.00
_________.10. OQ_.
$1.123.75
Schield Family Brands CustomQuote System™ 2.17.0
mm
Staff Report
May 28, 2009
Historic Review for 320 College Street
Structure: Iowa City Landmark and National Register property
Oassification: NA
The applicant, Trinity Episcopal Church, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration and addition project
at 320 College Street, an Iowa City Landmark and National Register property. The project consists of several
modifications in order to accommodate a building expansion.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations
4.1 Foundations
4.4 Mass and Rooflines
4.7 Wmdows
4.12 Chimneys
5.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Additions
5.1 Expansion of Building Footprint
Staff Comments
Trinity Episcopal Church is a Gothic Revival style building with vertical board and batten siding. A dentil
course is used instead of a freeze board. Several sympathetic additions on the site have allowed the growth of
the congregation without detracting from the original structure. The building now creates a quadrangle with a
small inner courtyard. Only the east wing, the original structure, is listed on the National Register. The
building is listed on the National Register for its significant design and building technique as well as its
association with Richard Upjohn, who was one of the most famous Gothic Revival architects in the country.
The applicant is proposing several alterations in order to expand the usable space in the building.
Basement
The applicant is proposing to excavate below the existing building to create usable space in a basement. They
are planning on removing the existing stone foundation walls, replacing with a reinforced concrete
foundation, and using a veneer of the original stone on the exposed portions of the foundation.
The guidelines recommend repairing historic foundations rather than replacing them; however, the existing
foundation is not being replaced because it is failing. The church wishes to expand in its current location and
there is very limited space on the site to allow for expansion. Staff believes that excavating below the building
and creating usable space in a basement is an appropriate way to retain the existing use of the building, while
minimizing changes to the historic appearance of the building. In Staff's opinion, because the applicant is
planning on using the original stone as a veneer for the new foundation, there will be minimal impact to the
historic character of the building.
Stair tower
The applicant is proposing to construct a new stair tower on the east elevation facing Gilbert Street. This
stair tower will provide access to the new basement and replace a cellar door with stairs. The stair tower is
approximately 15' x 13'. It will be approximately as tall as the existing entryway on the east elevation. The
stair tower will be finished to blend in with the existing church, using board and batten siding, dentils, and
roofing materials to match. There will be minimal demolition of the existing wall where the stair tower is
being added, with the siding and stained glass window remaining on the interior of the stair tower. A stained
glass window that was found in the organ chamber will be installed on the south wall of the stair tower. Two
new windows that are similar to other existing windows on the building will also be placed in the stair tower,
with the intention that stained glass windows will replace them when financially feasible. This will provide
natural light into the stairway.
The guidelines allow for additions to existing buildings, provided that the addition preserves historic materials
and features and is does not diminish the character of the historic structure. In Staff's opinion, although this
addition is on the most visible f~ade of the building, it is not intrusive or overwhelming to the design of the
building. It is recommended that additions are distinguishable from the historic building. Staff believes that
since the existing exterior wall will still be present inside the stair tower, it will be evident that the stair tower
is a later addition.
Chimney
The applicant is proposing to demolish a brick chimney on the north elevation. According to the applicant
this was a later addition and is not original to the building. The applicant also proposes to remove a vent on
the north elevation. The siding and roofing materials will be filled in to match existing.
The guidelines disallow removal of prominent chimneys that are important to the historic architectural
character of the building. In Staff's opinion, this chimney is not important to the architectural character of
the building and does not have any significant historic value.
Courtyard
The configuration of the church creates an internal courtyard. This courtyard is only accessible through
portions of the church and its additions. The applicant is proposing to make some changes to portions of the
church that are only visible from within the courtyard. In order to do this, they are proposing to remove the
glass breezeway on the south elevation, so there is easier access to the courtyard. After the work in the
courtyard is finished, the glass breezeway will be reconstructed as is. Staff believes that this will have minimal
effect of the appearance of the building.
The work in the courtyard involves a lean-to addition that was added at some point in the past. The applicant
would like to remove the lean-to and reconstruct it with a higher roofline and a slightly larger foot print.
Currently there is approximately 5-6' of clear space on the interior of this portion of the church, and the
applicant would like to raise it to be more usable. The proposed new eaves lines up with the existing eaves of
the fellowship hall. New windows will be used on this addition that are the same as the windows used in the
parish hall addition during the 1990's. The space will also be expanded slightly to the south. This is to
provide access to the insides of the organ to allow for more regular cleaning and maintenance. Some
previously closed in window and door spaces will be eliminated, and a new window will be installed. The
addition is to be finished with siding, trim details, and roofing to match the existing building
The guidelines allow for additions that are compatible with the existing building. In Staff's opinion, this
addition is compatible with the existing building. In addition, the addition will not be seen from the street,
alley, or neighboring properties. Staff believes it will have minimal impact on the historic integrity of the
building
Summary
In general, Staff believes that the proposed work is compatible with the existing building and retains the
historic character of the building. In Staff's opinion, this is a suitable way for a church to maintain its current
location in a historic building, while allowing for an expansion in its membership and services. The applicant
and the designers have taken care to make sure that the changes are compatible with the architectural and
historical integrity of the building. According to the architect, this is a LEED project, so as many materials as
possible will be reused or recycled.
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 320 College Street as presented in the
application.
A[
'lication for Historic R
.
llew
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties
located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at:
www.icgov.org/HPhandbook
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the secondThursday of each month. During
the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications
are due in the PCD Office by noon on Thursday two weeks prior to the meeting.
See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates.
For Staff Use: 5" -7 C
.- I ::> -D I
Date submitted .......................................................
o Certificate of No Material Effect
.A ~ertificate of Appropriateness
~ Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
o Owner .!.~!:.'.~y.~.P.!~.~?p.~!.g~.~~~~...~(.?~.~~..~~.I~?.~......
Phone. (~~ .~).~~.!. ~?~.?.~........ .......................................... ........ .....
Add ress . ~.?~..~. ~.?~~~.~~.. ~~............................ ............. ..... ........
Iowa City . 52240
.................................................................................Zlp...................
emai I.~.?~~?~:.~:.'.~ .~~W~~.i.~: ~?~............ .... ............ .....................
o Contractor .......................... ............ ..........................................
Add ress ............................................................... ...........................
.................................................................................zip...................
Phon e........................... ........................................ ............... ............
email................................................................................................
EI Consultant .~~~.~~..~~.~~.~y.:..~.~.~~.~.~~..~.?~.~?~.~~~~.i
Add ress .~.?~..~. ~.?~ ~~.~~..~~:..~.~!~.~ ..~~.~.................. ...............
Iowa City . 52240
.................................................................................Zlp...................
319-338-7878
Phone..... .... ......... ... ... ...... ........ ....... ........... ...... ....... ..... ....... .... .... .....
.........................................................................................................
.\ ssomsky@neumannmonson.com
emal................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
EI Site plan
EI Floor plans
EI Building elevations
EI Photographs
EI Product information
o Other ..............................................................................
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan, floor plans, building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently
describe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
Address of property .~.?~.g~.I.I.~~.~..?.~.......................... .....................
....................................................................................................................
Use of property .~~~~~~.......................................................................
. 1871
Date constructed (If known) ...............................................................
Historic Designation
EI This property is a local historic landmark
OR
o This property is located in the:
D Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
o Longfellow Historic District
o Summit Street Historic District
o Woodlawn Historic District
o Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
o Contributing
D Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Project Type
o Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights. window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
GI Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
D Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not
change its appearance
o Other ..............................................................................................
._ "0 ~
~ ~1 - fac'
'I to =
! J Q...c C <1>
I W ~8 ~~-g
~ ~.- CI) :::nJ E
8 ..!:; .o....c"O <1>
. I ~wo<(a:
I CI)
l!ill Iii ~
111!11 II I B
b'II!1 I'll i ~
illll II ~ 0
,lll:11 I: i ro
~ . 0
z (/) ~
o I- i:ll
Z U ~ . II \ i 1~.. ~ i~
o <D - s, I k~ p~
i ~ ; . 8 ii · 5:~~ t i ~~
z . _ ~! I ' .i.. I cl~
<( I ~ . -I i t,n ~ U.
~ u ~ ~ ~ j II I HU ~ r
C3 Ct!: ;; u ~ &1
z<(:~~
{i
9
ti . "
Ii dl
. i' .
;a.tl aU
~: ~k; II
i fl~ i!l 'q ~
!...~l hfi jao~
I Iii , i, I ~
. ~h! i ~. I
~ i~~ ' ~ I .. ~
I ~~. ~ I ~ ~!I ~8
~ h Ii! h II II! n
~ n f ~I d~ nl Ii
g n ~~U II ; U i II ~~
i ~~ !M !l ~ ~~ ~ :1 !i
o
I
I ~~. ~ fi
~~ ~ I i~ I ~~I'lal
III ~ ~I II I ! I I I I P ! Ii i I ~
, II I !!II Ii I Ii n I II 'Ill!!! Ii 1111,11111
d II nill ! II i I ~ I- ~ II ~ I. i ~ ~ ! ~ ~I ~ III !~ ~I ~ 1 i i~
~ I I I I I h I H I i ~ I! i II I I d ~ ~ i I I n I I ~ i h ~i~! i I d
~088000808@0000@000@@0@@00@0@@00@@
. i~
1 II~:
i i. i;
i D~j~
~
~
,-
o
,-
o
1<(
-'
(-----------..: ~
l~!
~ ~
-'
(-----------..~ ~
'/!l,e:
: -' ! ~
'f-.-I----- --.} '?
,__ i:?
. \ ~
-..'----~,J ~
c;
~.
~
z
o
5
o
"
w
o
-' n
~
t
~
~.
~
Z
o
~
ill
o
~
ffi~
It;
::>~
~
<(
z (/)
o f-
Vl
Z U
o LJ.J
~ f-
Z -
~ I
~ U
::J ""
LJ.J
Z <C
[fJ
I-
a
z
~ ...J
<(
0:
W
Z
W
'"
z
:s
tL
0:
a
9
"-
Iii
Illl ~ ~ I'
~dH ~ H
'Iii d H
I~h ~ ~ <!
IU~ l ~ i i
h~~ i i s i !
IK~~ i. I ~ ~
lIlt d~ I II
1.0. 1 1~ 8 . ,
z
ill ~
'I' --l
I'! ~
1111 ~
11'1_ w
j, . ;::
., i 0
. --l
T"""
o
T"""
I
'e:{
i
8Iil!l!-.
!i I !'U i
1'1 ~ _R__{
I ~ .1--1
-I! "~~
I~ J ~na
~~
~ i~
11~
~~
I.
i ~y
~H
::,jr
.l
I
I!jll
111"1
!Ii"i!l
i III
Ill:ll
o "'0
~I~ 111 &-,= ~ .~
~-rw ~8~~-g
~ ~ 'c.~ ::J"'O E
~ i'C 0.-'="'0 Q)
lI-WO<t:a:
.s:
o
5
ti
OJ
~j
lS.
;BJ!
~-
,~]6
! '~.,
1-. ,
d~
r i Ii
: f:' ! I
I!! ji!~
I !!
. _!
. ~ d I ~
I II!. p
iiiH!~1
iil! dL
000000008808000000
Cl
Z
w
'"
~
z
:s
0-
'"
z
::J
W
()
Cl
t
~
"-
W
0:
[fJ l
Id
~n
~ ~ *
. .
~H
~H
w
0:
Ui
5
z
~
"
z
~ i
~ i I
g i d
t PI
~ . ~ .
tb ~ H
0: 000808888
~
(~_mm__n_: I
I I 3'
, ----- --: i
9
<? .
~
~
~~
9~
~
I -
ro- -
- - ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I
~- ~ . ----
0 0
I 0 o Ht;;;'; \ 0 0
0 0 0 0
-- - ~ --- I
0 0 0 0 0
--, I 0 0 0
0 0
0
"G ] ~
o. 0 0 0 ~~
, ~ . ~L T
" I 0 0 }
~
~
\1
:J
[!]
"
!
0:
~
t
T'""'
<(
z V)
o f-
:2 u
o w
2: f-
Z -
Z I
i u
::J ""
u.J
Z <(
~~ -gO) I II I
.J:: I! ill
~rr' "
~H 2 ;5 C\J
I ~ ri~ 11% ~l~ 1 "m.b i! i mS 0
"! ~J~~l !~ ~ll o...c c Q) 1, dl li!"l
i'l ! EA." ,....
! '.i.-l 1'1 .. w ~8 ~~-g ,,~ till !Ijlll II.i ~ ~ I
- ~ p~l ~L ;fri. <!
i~ll~h~ ~ ...- en ::nJ E ~} ~~f iill! II!! ~ ffi 8
~r " c._
~ n: o.6~ Q) f' Iii LiB i i~I;I~
,) I. ~5 , i 8::-l
ll-W a: ! t-~j · ::> u.
. i ~
i~~d i ~.
ill uill i i I
~ ml; I ; i
;;! h-! ~ ~ ~ i
ffi !~~~ ,'~ g i
~ iiU1 Ii 1111
"- ii' ~I ~~ ~ ~ I
a: ~! ~t 11 i III ~
g .~ ~ .~ .1 8 . I
.J
U. -' ..,;..,.; to
Cl
i ~ ~
I I ~ j
,.~ 1,1 . ~ ~
~ r i :J I
i Pi ~ ~ ~ ~
Inl;q ~ I ~
1I~ld; it DfEIj
000000000000000000 ~ ~
'" i
W I
b
~ I i
"- ~ ~
~d
~ ~ .
Cl . ~
W . ,
>- , ~
~U
W
a: .;..
'"
W
b
z
i\j
'"
z
~ I
Cl t
5 ~
~ i
~ i
() .
~ .
.. .
~ 000000000
-'
(~___m__m_: ~
, ' w
, I '-
, ____m n_ I I
'*'
~.
~
a:
o
~
~
~~
::>~
Cf)
<(
~
~.
~
i
iOO
'"
Z
:J
III
"
~
ffi
a:
~
~~
::> ~
~
)'.
~
~OO
~
~oo
T"""
<(-
iOO
z U)
o I-
Z U
o
:?: I-
Z -
Z I
~ U
::l ""
L.W
Z <C
~~
~ j~
}t"?
, ."
4~
! ~.
a "~
~1~,
""'r
,)
"0
~I~ ~Il ~-C ~ ~
- w >-8 ug"8
01. !:g co ~'O E
. F ,-'o....c"O (J)
~ } ~wO<(a:
~ ,I
iil i l:i~
.~.' !!Ih,'
Iii i ;i;; 1
i ill !Iii
1
. A
~
~ ~li!
! ~ i ~~
H ~ lIP
i I ~ !~! I
~~~q~
d ~ H! g
~ ~. !.~!
~ i H qq
b II Ig LL
~ i lid h ~
'" eee ee e
<11
- - - - . - - - f ~
--1[--:; i.
. ~ ~
__ __...JI
un' " C'i)
:::lw ij 0
~~1ji
I::
-u----i':.~
t
d:
m____~j
:'~,' ! 1 !
t
I"
I"
nmf
4
~! ~I
~I~ ~:
~Ii !Il
,L ~" ,L
~
'iI
.l~
w~
,~~
, ,E.
. ...."
,i.t III
,II! 'I'
111!ll I' I ~
11'11 I' a: 0
~I'ld I'll Q ~
illll I' I! ffi?';
I~l:il !; i X ~
OUJUJ
.i ~ ~
- ~ ~
Iii
l .'
iil ,.~~
no nH
"'"
-----" z
o
_ __n_., I ~
~
; ::
--- --"1.J
-------,.
. ~~~~Jj
,....
o
C\I
.I
J<(
~
z
o
F
~
w
5~
o'
"'~
C\J
<(
Z if)
o >-
::2 u
o u.>
::'E >-
Z -
Z :r:
~ U
:::J "'"
u.>
Z <(
~el 6 "U
H~ ~I~ Iii ~~ ~i
I~M ~ll >-00.0:;::; 0
""I~ ... +-' L...._
~ ~ ~ ~ .c.!!2 :J"O E
~ r ~ -.C o..~"O <D
.J ~ f I-W O<t:a:
8 ~niint
iiI' :t: I
: j iii I Hn
8 1
~ ~ ~
j G 2~
~ ." .~
. ; l h.
~ ~ 1 H;;
i Ii. g' I
~~~"..
-I! HI!
I ~ ~ ~!~;
~ ,~ ! U ~
~ i i ~.~!
~ ~ Ii n~ ;
~ I i II nl ;
~ 000 00 0
~
i
~
~;
I::
(
'"
(
w :c
z
o
~
~
w
>-~
~~
:: Ci)
ii ()
~
~
<mm
~
4!l!ImJ
C __nn___,
.1 ;!
j' I'
~I II
I: ~:
U
-Ii
5
"iI
~l
~!
,~!
! ~.
Ii ill Ii!
-nil I! I CJ)
111'11 I 'I a: 15
j'lld III Q~
iilll III' mr.:
~ i~I;I~ Ii ~ >< ~
~ . w w
<l
<l
!'
Ii'
~I
C\J
o
C\J
I
<t
z <.I)
o f--
~ U
o ill
~ f--
Z -
~ I
~ U
::J '"
ill
Z 4:
t !
I I I'
I. II ~
IIIl 'I' 0 CJ)
Illlll I'! b~
111,111 ill I, I lli ~
illl' 111-- a:
II&! , i! - 0
,l,bl;;!' 1 ~Z
I . CJ) 4:
i~
~ iI
ii~
! !~
j ~,
~U
:::,]r
el
. lJ
~I~!h ~-'= ~~
~r ~ll .?:-8 e:e 0
~ ~ oCo~ ::llJ E
~ i oC Q..-'=O lJ<( Q)
~ I-W a:
ii
~
~~
!~i
JEH
1-- _
6 I'H it
~II~_. .. ! HU i
II ' .1-.1
~H I nil
i .'
Ii! utI
/!? ~ ~I
MIIoIi lIBllIIC 8lBllIloIl _c
ZlIN ~"'I ..,.llbl: "^W
Mr,I.l.Y8IiIilQlllU
."
C\I
o
(Y)
"
1<3:
1
.
"'=t
<(
~
U>
a: ~
;;-;
t;~
C\J
<(
z Vl
o f-
;2 U 0
o w 0
::;;: f-
Z --
~ I
::;;: U
::J 0<
L.U
Z <(
8 ~~I'iq!n
.~ f ~I~~ 1
~;iifii'
] ;?ll1 ~ a~
1
.\
~~
~ i~
i J~
! !~
i ~~
~ l~
:::;j 1"
JI
.
I -g~
~I. ~IJ ~-C ~'Q)
~W ~8~~"8
i ~'c.~ ::::nJ E
'd -'- ^ -ClJ ~\
S t ~WO<(a:
~
"
.c:
U
03
8~
s-h
j~!5
~ ~~j
~.
! i
i i
Ii ill !i!
'I!N II I z
!I',I!I,llli ~
ill'l II ~ LL
,ill;!, I: i 8
: , c:
. .'
Hi HU
I! __~_----W-~:i_~~T~~~~_=~-
id ~.
) ---- t~~~
n
il
In
8
8i
i
8
~
<Ej
8
<Ej
-~--r-
-----------+--=---
I
,....
C\I
,....
I
~
~
8~
a:~
('I')
<(
, AI
:t,
~
-~
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
THURSDAY, MAY 14, 2009
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL
PRELIMINARY
MEMBERS PRESENT: Esther Baker, Thomas Baldridge, Lindsay Bunting Eubanks, William Downing,
Carl Hirschman, Pam Michaud, Jim Ponto, Alicia Trimble, Frank Wagner
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ginalie Swaim
STAFF PRESENT: Christina Kuecker
OTHERS PRESENT: Scott Kading
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Bunting Eubanks called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
430 N. Van Buren Street.
Kuecker stated that the owner of the property has withdrawn this application.
13 S. Linn Street.
Kuecker stated that the intent of this project is to make the property ADA accessible. She showed a
photograph of the house and stated that it is a local landmark currently serving as a commercial building.
Kuecker said the applicant would like to add a ramp and would raise grade about one foot. She said it
would be a fairly small ramp. Kuecker said it would start farther back and would be fairly difficult to see
from the street. She said the applicant would also like to add a door for access.
Kuecker said the ramp would be constructed of wood. She said the door would be a simple, steel, fire-
rated door used for comnmercial structures. Kuecker said that staff feels this is an appropriate way to
address the ADA accessibility of the property without being detrimental to the most visible facades of the
property. She said that in general, the guidelines recommend not adding new openings to a building.
Kuecker said that in this case, since it won't be seen from the street, staff feels it is fine.
Kuecker said staff recommends approval of the application as proposed, with the condition that any
handrail, if needed, is just a simple, black handrail.
Kading, the owner of the property, said that there are two buildings right next to each other. He said that
the way the grade is set up, this will ramp up less than a foot with a somewhat even continuance to the
back, so both these buildings will be handicapped accessible. He said that he is working with the
neighboring property owner on some issues. He said that this should allow him to make the space a lot
more usable and will not affect much externally.
MOTION: Ponto moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 13 South Linn
Street as proposed, with the staff recommendation that if there needs to be a handrail that it be a
simple black metal handrail. Trimble seconded the motion.
Ponto said that this is a really good way to make something handicapped accessible while not changing
anything noticeable in the front.
The motion carried on a vote of 9-0 (Swaim absent).
Historic Preservation Commission
May 14, 2009
Page 2
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR APRIL 13. 2009.
MOTION: Downing moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's April 13,
2009 meeting, as written. Trimble seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 9-0 (Swaim
absent).
OTHER:
Bunting Eubanks said that one of the City Council members asked about how to reconcile the movement
of energy efficiency with historic preservation. Bunting Eubanks suggested the Commission come up
with a list of ideas to include on the website and possibly in the handbook.
Bunting Eubanks said that one concern was that solar panels are only allowed on the side of a building
not facing the street within the guidelines. She said the City Council member was also concerned with
adding a bump out area to add insulation to the exterior of a house. Bunting Eubanks suggested this
could cause water damage. Kuecker said that it would also cover trim and potentially historic features.
Kuecker said one council member stated that adding insulation could bump the exterior of a house out a
couple of inches and asked how that is detrimental to the historic character of the building. She said there
are things that can be done to a house in the name of energy efficiency that are permitted under the
guidelines. Kuecker said that the Commission could brainstorm ideas to come up with a list. She said
there might be things that are currently not allowed in the guidelines that the Commission might want to
consider allowing, since the guidelines are in the process of being rewritten.
Bunting Eubanks said that new types of energy efficient materials are being developed, including
materials like photo-voltaic paint that captures solar energy. Downing mentioned insulating attics.
Bunting Eubanks asked if that ever caused water damage. Downing said that that isn't usually an issue.
Baldridge said that Jim Throgmorton with the University is interested in green issues and might be willing
to share his expertise.
Downing said that one important factor is upgrading the mechanical systems of a house. He said that a
lot of the older houses have boilers that are ancient and run at 40% efficiency.
Bunting Eubanks said that an article in a preservation magazine discussed how when one removes a
porch and there are cracks in the wall, the cracks could be filled with spray in foam insulation before the
porch is rebuilt. She said the Commission could make those suggestions part of its recommendations
when it issues certificates. Bunting Eubanks said that when an owner fixes up his house gradually, he
deals with a lot of those problems.
Hirschman said that he did his entire house by blowing in insulation from the interior. He added that it
greatly reduced his utility bill. Hirschman said that it cost him around $8,000. He said that there was a tax
rebate and a State of Iowa property rehabilitation tax credit available.
Bunting Eubanks said there was a great article on windows also. Hirschman asked if storm windows had
to come before the Commission. Kuecker confirmed that storm windows did not need to come before the
Commission He said that at this point one can get a storm window that is essentially like putting on a
double pane for much less cost.
Bunting Eubanks said that a historic preservation commission in Colorado came out with a pamphlet
describing different things that could be done. She said she was thinking more along the lines of just
adding bullet points to the website. Michaud said that those bullet points could then refer people to
technical websites.
Bunting Eubanks said that a second idea is what the Commission should amend the guidelines to include.
The Commission discussed the use of recycled materials and the new tax benefits available. Bunting
Historic Preservation Commission
May 14, 2009
Page 3
Eubanks suggested having a section entitled "The Green Side of Historic Preservation," with a link to the
window page. She asked people to e-mail further ideas to Kuecker.
Trimble said that when people come to the Commission and complain about energy efficiency, it almost
always involves windows. Bunting Eubanks said that the statement on windows says that windows might
not actually be the problem, but it could be all the cracks in the building. Trimble said that people seem to
think that vinyl windows work better than they do, but that has not been her experience.
Ponto said that Tim Toomey had a good idea in that especially the old double hung windows with the
weights have a space that cannot be insulated. Ponto stated that Toomey had a way of using a PVC pipe
that the weight would be inside and then putting insulation around that. Ponto said there are ways to
insulate an old double hung window.
Baker said that Downing's point might be the best one to make, in that greenest thing for one to do is to
fix what he's got. Bunting Eubanks said that is also the least expensive. She said there is a lot of debate
about how much it costs to do historic preservation. Bunting Eubanks said that if an owner is able to fix
what he has, then he doesn't have to buy anything new.
Kuecker asked if there are green products or technologies that the Commission would like to have in the
guidelines. Specifically, she asked if the Commission wanted to allow solar panels on prominent street
elevations. Kuecker said the guidelines currently state that it is not recommended to install atennas, vents,
solar collectors, skylights, or other mechanical devices on a prominent street elevation. Downing said
that not recommended is soft language to begin with.
Ponto said the Commission might want to make some sort of blanket concession that as technology
changes, the Commission will review new materials. He said the Commission could ask that anyone
planning something for the exterior of a house should come before the Commission to discuss it, and the
Commission will make every effort to accommodate the homeowner within the guidelines.
Bunting Eubanks said she thinks that solar panels will probably be outdated in 20 years, to be replaced
by the paint that uses solar energy. Downing said that solar panels are not very efficient, because such a
large amount is needed to generate sufficient energy.
Kuecker said that in Dubuque, the City plans to put photo-voltaic shingles on the City Hall. She said the
Commission might want to discuss something like that before it is included in an application. Downing
said that the shingles look like ordinary black shingles but slightly shiny.
Downing said that he feels that in the next 20 years the ideas of individuals collecting solar energy in their
own home will give way to larger utility companies collecting solar energy on a larger scale. Bunting
Eubanks said the idea is whether the Commission wants to give individuals th,e option to choose that if
they want to.
Michaud asked how often the guidelines are rewritten. Kuecker said they wer,e written in 2000 and are
being rewritten in 2009. Michaud said that including a statement, that says as new materials and
technologies become available the Commission will review them.
Bunting Eubanks said the Commission members should think about the subject and realize that this is a
criticism of the Commission. Ponto stated that besides windows, what people most criticize the
Commission for is its stance on vinyl siding and the insulation underneath.
Regarding the use of green products, Downing said that the LEED rating system discourages vinyl in
almost every way. Kuecker agreed that vinyl is one of the least green products available, partly because
of the production process and the contaminants released in the process. Downing added that vinyl is very
hard to recycle.
Bunting Eubanks said the Commission could come up with a more concise list. She asked Commission
members to e-mail them to staff and the other Commission members.
Historic Preservation Commission
May 14, 2009
Page 4
Baldridge asked about providing some sort of open-ended invitation in that building materials and
technology are constantly changing, and if a homeowner has an idea of what they want to do on their
house, they should feel free to bring that idea to the Commission, which will try to work with them on it.
He said that sounds more user-friendly.
Bunting Eubanks said that one of the big problems is that there are salesmen out there who want to bring
up new products and promise things about them that haven't been tested. She said that she has seen
that before with roofing materials in particular.
Michaud said that rather than suggest that the Commission will amend its guidelines, the Commission
could state that it will be happy to do a product review.
Ponto said that another green thing about historic neighborhoods is that there are a lot of mature trees
that provide shade and therefore energy savings. He said that is one benefit over a new subdivision.
Kuecker said that Helen Burford wanted her to remind everyone of the Parade of Historic Homes on
Sunday. Kuecker said there are four historic homes and one new home with the entire interior made of
historic materials.
Michaud said that on Tuesday there was an article about a proposed historic district in New York that has
been under review for two years. She said there are thousands of buildings there, and it has become a
very protracted process. Michaud said that in preface, many of the buildings were altered or demolished.
Michaud asked if, when there is a proposed district, there is a way to freeze demolition permits until the
district is voted on. Kuecker said that it is already in the zoning code that when City Council sets its public
hearing, it puts a freeze on the area so that anything that is going to happen needs to meet the new
regulations, even if it is just being reviewed. She said she believes the period is !90 days from the point at
which the City Council sets the public hearing.
Kuecker said that is happening now on the Northside in that she is getting applications for projects there.
She said people want to do work now, but because City Council has not completed all of its votes, a
homeowner still has to go through the review process until the district is approved or denied.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte
c
.2
tn
.~
E'O
E t.-
o 0
(J"
Q)
co:::
.2 Q) en
..,,0
coco
~CON
Q)'O
tn c
e.s
0-<(
"
'1:
o
..
.~
J:
~ UJ
.... X X X X X X X 0 X X
-
It')
M UJ UJ
.... X 0 X X X X X 0 X X
~
N UJ UJ
.... X X X X 0 0 x x x x
M
M UJ
.... 0 x x x x x x x x x
-
N
co I
0 X X X X I X X X X X
- I
.... I
l/) .... en 0 ...... ...... en 0 en 0 en
E.~ ...... e ...... ...... .... e ...... 0 ~ e
0; -. -. 0; -. -.
Q)~ en en en en en en en en
N N ~ ~ N ~ N N N N
t-w ?i -. ?i ?i ?i ?i -.
C") C") C") C") C")
c
G) Cl Ul nl
Cl E 1:' ...
1:' C .lll:: ~ G)
Q) 'c c ~ E :c G)
.;:: ... nl 0 c
E 1:' G) ~ nl (,) ~ - 'iij E Cl
.lll:: .c Ul (,) c
ro iij nl ~ .!::: 0 ~ ';:: nl
Z In In C W :I: i D. I- 3:
'0
al
III
::J
U
><
UJ
'+>
--5j
c: c: III
alQ).o
1Il1ll<(
Q).o
..C::<( II
~II II!:!:!
~xoo